Marina City Council
August 16, 2022

AGENDA

Tuesday, August 16, 2022 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK SUSTAINABLE

COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER

MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MARINA GROUNDWATER

SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California

Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

In accordance with California Government Code §54953(e)(1)(A) and (C) and the Proclamation of a State of Emergency issued by Governor Newsom o n March 4, 2020, under the provisions of Go vernment Code §8625 related to the COVID -19 (coronavirus) pandemic, consistent with recommendations by State and local health officials regarding social distancing and in order to prevent an imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as determine d in Resolution 2022-94, public participation in City of Marina City Council public meetings shall be electronic only and without a physical location for public participation until the earlier of May 31, 2022, or such time as the City Council may ado pt a resolution in accordance with Government Code §54953(e)(3). This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Access Media Productions (AMP) Community Television Cable 25 and on t he City of Marina Channel and on the i nternet at https://accessmediaproductions.org/

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in real-time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of this a genda. Instructions on how to acce ss, vie w a nd participate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by usi ng the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only. If you are unable to participate in real-time, you may email to [email protected] with the subject line “Public Comment Item#__ ” (insert the item number relevant to your comment) or “Public Comment – Non Agenda Item.” Comments will be reviewed and distr ibuted before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All com ments received will become part of t he record. Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materi als, staff reports and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s websit e www.cityofmarina.org. Materials r elated to an item on this agenda submitted to the Coun cil after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Mari na website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Page 2

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small tow n bedroom community to a small city which i s diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self-sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it from the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide the leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a bala nce of housing, jobs and business opportuni ties that will result in a community c haracterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation and cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of munici pal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonpr ofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Ma rina Groundwater Sustainability Agency)

Cristina Medina Dirksen, David Burnett, Lisa Berkley, Mayor Pro -Tem/Vice Chair Kathy Biala, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. CLOSED SESS ION: As permitted by Government Code Sect ion 54956 et seq., the (City Council, A irport C ommissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonpr ofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency M embers and Ma rina Groundwater Sustainabili ty Agency) may adjourn to a C losed or E xecutive Session to consider specific matters dealing with litigation, certain personnel matters, property negotiations or to confer with the City’s Meyers -Milias- Brown Act representative.
a. Labor Negotiations
i. Marina Employee Association
ii. Marina Professional Fire Fighters Association
c. Real Property Negotiation
i. Property: Commercial property at southeast corner of Del Monte Blvd. and Palm Avenue (APN 032-303-038) and residential property at Hayes Circle and 3rd Avenue (APN 032-303-039, a portion)
Negotiating Party: George Powell
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
b. Performance Evaluation of Public Empl oyee, Unrepresented Employee (CA Govt.

Code Section 54957(b)(1) – City Manager

6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN I N

CLOSED SESSION

4. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Page 3

6. SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE FLOOR: Any member of the Public or the City Council may make an announcement of special events or meetings of interest as information to Council a nd Public. Any member of the pub lic may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction which is not on the agenda. Please state your name for the record. Action will not be taken on an item that is not on the agenda. If it requires action, it will be r eferred to staff and/o r pla ced on a futu re agenda. City C ouncil members or City staff may briefly respond to stat ements made or que stions posed as permitted by Government Code S ection 54954.2. In order that all interested parties have an opportunity to speak, please limit comments to a maximum of four (4) minutes. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council.

7. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FO RMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the S uccessor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these item s are considered to be routine. Al l items under the Consent Agenda ar e normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or the City Council may a sk a quest ion or make a comment a bout an agenda item and staff wil l provide a response. If discussi on or a lengthy explanation is requ ired, that item will b e removed from the Consent Agenda for Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency and placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

8. CONSENT AGENDA: Background information has been provid ed to the City Council, Airport Commission, Marina Abrams B Non-Profit Corporation, and Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda , and these items are considered to be routi ne. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally appro ved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or the City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff will provide a response. If di scussion or a lengthy ex planation is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed at the end of Other Action Items. a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
(1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 100460-100595, totaling $922,490.04 Accounts Payable for Successor Agency Check Number 91, totaling $3,772.50 b. MINUTES:
(1) July 26, 2022, Special City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS:
(1) City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2022-, approving advertising and call for bids for the execution of the California Avenue P edestrian Crossing Installation project.
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS:
(1) City Council consider adoptin g Resolution No. 2022 -, regarding the Ralph M.

Brown Act (California Go vernment Code §§54950 -54963, making c ertain findings; and authorizing t he city to continue to i mplement remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies for the period August 21, 2022, through September 19, 2022.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Page 4

g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: None
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS:
(1) City Council consider adopting Resol ution No. 2022 -, a pproving a professional services agreement between the City of Marina and Axiom Home Tech to install the Marina Library AV System; and receiving, allocating, and appropriating $7,500 from the Friends of Marina Library to the QLF2111 project budget ; and allocating and appropriating $1 1,000 from the unallocated General Fund balance to the QLF2111 project budget; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and authorizing the City Manager to amend the contract to increase the contract limit up to an additional 10% of the contract amount in the event of material cost escalation ; and authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING):
(1) City Council read by title only an d consider adopting Ordinance No. 2022-, approving the fir st a mendment to the dev elopment ag reement related t o the Marina Station Project.
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None

9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None

10. OTHER ACTIONS ITE MS OF THE SUCCE SSOR A GENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA R EDEVELOPMENT AGEN CY: Action l isted for each Agenda i tem is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. The pu blic is invited to approach th e pod ium to provide up to four (4) min utes of public comment.

11. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff.

The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. The public is invited to approach the podium to provide up to four (4) minutes of public comment.

Note: No additional major projects or prog rams should be undertaken w ithout r eview of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2022 -, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
b. City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2022-, authorizing the resumption of the Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, the Public Works Commission, the Economic Development Commission an d the Tree Committee ’ and authorizing the disbanding of the Design Review Board.
c. City Council receive an update report on the Cypress Knolls property.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Page 5

d. City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2022-, amending Resolution No. 80- 71, as amended, Establishing the Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of Meetings; amending Paragraph 8 regarding Order of Business and Consid eration and Sequence of Agenda Items ; amending Paragraph 9 regarding Preparation of the Minutes; amending Paragraph 13 regarding Debate; amending Paragraph 27 regarding Manner of Addressing Council ; and approving a new Agenda format in substantially the same form.

12. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council and staff opportunity to ask a que stion for clarification or make a b rief report on his or her own activities as permitted by Government Code Section 54954.2.

13. ADJOURNMENT:

CERTIFICATION

I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall and Counc il Ch ambers Bulletin Board at 211 Hi llcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Marina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bulletin Board at the corne r of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard on or before 6:30 p.m., Friday, August 12, 2022.

___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Commission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of th e City Clerk and kept for a period of 90 days after t he formal approval of MINUTES.

City C ouncil meetings may be v iewed live on the me eting nigh t and at 1 2:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on C able Channel 25 on the Sunday following the Regular City Council meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:30 p.m. every Monday, Tuesd ay a nd W ednesday. For more info rmation ab out viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items an d staff reports are public re cord and are available f or public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the ho urs of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., o n the Monday preceding the meeting.

Supplemental ma terials r eceived after the close of the final agenda and through noo n on the day of the scheduled meeting will be available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

Members of the public may receive the City Council, Airport Commission and Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Agenda at a cost of $55 per year or by providing a self-addressed, stamped envelope to the C ity Clerk. The Agenda is als o available at no cos t via ema il b y n otifying th e City Clerk at [email protected]
ALL MEETINGS A RE OP EN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CIT Y OF M ARINA DOES N OT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH D ISABILITIES. Council Chambers are whee lchair accessible. meetings are broadcast on cable channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request. to request assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884-1278 or e-mail: [email protected]. requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 16, 2022 Page 6

U p c o m i n g 20 2 2 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , A i r p o r t C om mi s s i o n, M a r i n a Ab r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C or p o r a t i o n , P r e s t o n P ar k S u s ta i n ab le C om m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p or a t i o n , S u c ce s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p me n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a Gr ou ndw a t e r S u s t a i n a bi l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M eet i n g s : 5: 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s s i o n; 6 : 30 p .m . R e g u la r O p e n S es s i o n s

*Wednesday, September 7, 2022
Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

Tuesday, November 1, 2022
Tuesday, November 15, 2022

**Thursday, October 6, 2022
Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Tuesday, December 6, 2022
Tuesday, December 20, 2022

* Regular Meeting rescheduled due to Monday Holiday
** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to Religious Holiday NOTE: Regular Meeting dates may be rescheduled by City Council only. _________________________________________

CI T Y H A L L 2022 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Labor Day ------------------------------------------------------------- Monday, September 5, 2022 Veterans Day ---------------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 11, 2022 Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------ Thursday, November 24, 2022 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 25, 2022 Winter Break ------------------------ Friday, December 23, 2022-Friday, December 30, 2022 __ ___ __ _ _ _______ __ _ ___

2022 COMMISSION DATES

Upc o m i n g 2 022 Me e t i n g s of P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

August 22, 2022 October 13, 2022 November 10, 2022
September 8, 2022 October 27, 2022 December 18, 2022
September 22, 2022

Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Check 08/05/2022 100460 Accounts Payable Ace Hardware 4.88 Invoice Date Description Amount.
082574 07/21/2022 Tape 4.88
Check 08/05/2022 100461 Accounts Payable Doug Kuelpman 9,040.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
6740 07/29/2022 Airport Manager Recruitment - Second Installment 9,040.00 Check 08/05/2022 100462 Accounts Payable AT & T 44.08
Invoice Date Description Amount.

June - July 07/13/2022 AT&T 831-582-9957 520 5 44.08
Check 08/05/2022 100463 Accounts Payable AT & T 700.42
Invoice Date Description Amount.
000018497762 07/15/2022 CALNET3-9391023435 (237-267-6922) 184.16 000018485422 07/13/2022 CALNET3-9391023436 (239-461-6578) 70.54 000018497731 07/15/2022 CALNET3-9391023482 (884-0985) 23.87 000018497733 07/15/2022 CALNET3-9391023485 (884-2573) 24.76 000018497738 07/15/2022 CALNET3-9391023490 (884-9568) 44.38 000018497739 07/15/2022 CALNET3-9391023491 (884-9654) 84.87 000018544015 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023437 (384-0425) 47.16 000018544018 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023440 (384-0860) 24.45 000018544043 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023463 (384-7854) 24.42 000018544048 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023468 (384-9148) 24.43 000018539288 07/27/2022 CALNET3-9391023471 (582-0100) 51.42 000018539294 07/27/2022 CALNET3-9391023477 (582-9803) 24.38 000018544019 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023441 (384-0888) 24.42 000018544046 07/28/2022 CALNET3-9391023466 (384-8477) 47.16 Check 08/05/2022 100464 Accounts Payable Branch's Janitorial 2,235.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
228444 07/25/2022 Janitorial Service - Police/Fire/Airport July 2022 2,235.00 Check 08/05/2022 100465 Accounts Payable California Fire Chiefs Association 400.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.

Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 1 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
Agenda Item: 8a
1 02503 08/01/2022 Membership Renewal for D. McCoun & C. Vega 400.00 Check 08/05/2022 100466 Accounts Payable Petty Cash 1,986.03 Invoice Date Description Amount.
4/21-6/17/2022 07/21/2022 Replenish Petty Cash 1,986.03 Check 08/05/2022 100467 Accounts Payable Comcast 139.40 Invoice Date Description Amount.
06-26-22 06/26/2022 Cable Police & Fire 69.70
07-26-22 07/26/2022 Acct# 8155100290083819, Cable for Police & Fire 69.70 Check 08/05/2022 100468 Accounts Payable CSG Consultants 66,765.95 Invoice Date Description Amount.

B220750 05/02/2022 Building Plan Review Services 4/1-4/30/2022 6,327.45 44972 07/15/2022 Marina Building Services FY 17-23 31,062.50 45107 07/15/2022 Annual St Resurfacing 15,381.00
45112 07/15/2022 Permits/Development 13,995.00
Check 08/05/2022 100469 Accounts Payable Denise Duffy & Associates 10,670.25 Invoice Date Description Amount.
7905 04/05/2022 Blight Removal Project 10,670.25
Check 08/05/2022 100470 Accounts Payable First Alarm 35.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
696428 07/22/2022 Remote Access New Code Entry - City Hall 35.00 Check 08/05/2022 100471 Accounts Payable Josie Champaco-Uncangco 250.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
07-30-22 vd 07/30/2022 Vince DiMaggio Refund 250.00
Check 08/05/2022 100472 Accounts Payable L.N. Curtis & Sons 68.99 Invoice Date Description Amount.

INV614292 07/18/2022 Cover, Lower, GI Carrier 68.99
Check 08/05/2022 100473 Accounts Payable Labor Law Compliance Center 444.59 Invoice Date Description Amount.
1192159 06/30/2022 Federal & State Compliance Posters 444.59 Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 2 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
2 Check 08/05/2022 100474 Accounts Payable Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 16,168.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
221864 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 647.00
221866 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 2,410.00
221865 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 1,620.00
221867 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 290.00
221870 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 8,214.00
221868 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 2,349.00
221869 06/30/2022 LCW - Professional Services 638.00
Check 08/05/2022 100475 Accounts Payable Marina Chamber Of Commerce 1,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
06-06-22 06/06/2022 Covid Local Business Support Donation 1,000.00 Check 08/05/2022 100476 Accounts Payable Maynard Group Inc. 656.24 Invoice Date Description Amount.

IN2029004 08/01/2022 Acct # AC3746 656.24
Check 08/05/2022 100477 Accounts Payable Monterey County Clerk 20.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
22-3173 - 37132 08/01/2022 Transfer Tax Report Fees 20.00 Check 08/05/2022 100478 Accounts Payable Monterey County Sheriff's Department 27,372.54 Invoice Date Description Amount.
2275 07/11/2022 CJIS QE 6/30/22 27,372.54
Check 08/05/2022 100479 Accounts Payable Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & Hoss 24,864.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
222175 07/20/2022 General Representation - June-July 2022 11,197.00 222177 07/20/2022 Personnel Matters - June 2022 592.50
222176 07/20/2022 City Council Meetings 4,305.50
222173 07/20/2022 Contract Matters - June-July 2022 7,821.00 222174 07/20/2022 PRA Matters - June-July 2022 948.00
Check 08/05/2022 100480 Accounts Payable Pacific Gas & Electric 7,180.92 Invoice Date Description Amount.

Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 3 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
3 June-July 720-0 07/20/2022 PG&E - 0167505720-0 801.29 June-July 210-0 07/20/2022 PG&E - 3242976210-0 156.47
June-July 851-0 07/20/2022 PG&E - 3440977851-0 176.17
June-July 562-0 07/20/2022 PG&E - 4758891562-0 1,026.77 June-July 085-2 07/20/2022 PG&E - 5434906085-2 111.23
June-July 943-2 07/20/2022 PG&E - 6150212943-2 86.33
June-July 535-3 07/20/2022 PG&E - 6161832535-3 225.99
June-July 202-3 07/20/2022 PG&E - 6594070202-3 120.89
June-July 582-7 07/20/2022 PG&E - 8161432582-7 150.11
June-July 353-7 07/20/2022 PG&E - 9930567353-7 47.16
June-July 313-6 07/20/2022 PG&E 6793435313-6 - Site 6793435090 739.37 June-July 4148-6 07/20/2022 PG&E - 5593414148-6 242.44
June-July 827-8 07/20/2022 PG&E - 0423929827-8 131.72
272-1 June-July 07/19/2022 PG&E - 2862559272-1 40.87
683-2 June -July 07/19/2022 PG&E 6217294683-2 1,481.74
June-July 7172-2 07/27/2022 PG&E - 5618207172-2 1,033.30 June-July 8362-9 07/20/2022 PG&E - 5996678362-9 131.76
June-July 4795-7 07/27/2022 PG&E - 4467294795-7 477.31
Check 08/05/2022 100481 Accounts Payable Pinnacle Healthcare 404.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
374500 07/20/2022 Pinnacle Healthcare - Pre Emp Px 202.00 375040 07/22/2022 Pinnacle Healthcare - Pre Emp Px 202.00 Check 08/05/2022 100482 Accounts Payable Pure H2O 404.16 Invoice Date Description Amount.
17410 07/01/2022 Water Cooler Police/Fire 07/01/22 202.08 17608 08/01/2022 Water Cooler Police/Fire 08/01/22 202.08 Check 08/05/2022 100483 Accounts Payable Quill Corporation 495.54 Invoice Date Description Amount.
26370881 07/14/2022 Acct # 7474999 43.69
26342139 07/13/2022 Acct # 7474999 12.54
26340173 07/13/2022 Acct # 7474999 439.31
Check 08/05/2022 100484 Accounts Payable Regional Government Services 22,938.00 Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 4 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
4 Invoice Date Description Amount.
13770 06/30/2022 Quick Quack June 2022 661.50
13772 06/30/2022 Marina Dunes June 2022 22,276.50
Check 08/05/2022 100485 Accounts Payable Reserve Account - Pitney Bowes 1,500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
07-28-22 07/28/2022 Postage Meter Refill 1,500.00
Check 08/05/2022 100486 Accounts Payable Shartsis Friese LLP 164,365.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
5459343 07/29/2022 Professional Services - MPWSP - June 2022 164,365.00 Check 08/05/2022 100487 Accounts Payable SpeakWrite 554.55 Invoice Date Description Amount.
e6377241 08/01/2022 City of Marina - July 2022 554.55
Check 08/05/2022 100488 Accounts Payable Taygeta Scientific, Inc. 2,796.71 Invoice Date Description Amount.
000708-R-0017 08/01/2022 Barracuda Spam Firewall - August 2022 475.80 000423-R-0044 08/01/2022 Computer Network Defense - August 2022 2,000.00 000919 08/01/2022 Quarterly PD NAS Support & Data - Q2 2022 320.91 Check 08/05/2022 100489 Accounts Payable TechRx Technology Services 14,131.31 Invoice Date Description Amount.
10312 07/31/2022 IT Support - July 2022 10,200.00
10279 08/01/2022 Cisco 10-Port Gigbite Managed SFP Switch 716.25 10287 08/01/2022 Ninite Monthly Subscription - August 2022 112.50 10292 08/01/2022 Veeam Virtual Backup Monthly Subscription - August 2022 380.00 10142 06/01/2022 Amazon Glacier Terabyte Storage - June-Aug 2022 1,020.00 10274 07/25/2022 HP LaserJet M454dn for Payroll 1,027.61 10266 07/11/2022 Black 24' LCD Monitor, Mount it, Installation & setup 674.95 Check 08/05/2022 100490 Accounts Payable Tracnet 500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
1091 07/29/2022 CLETS - Marina PD 500.00
Check 08/05/2022 100491 Accounts Payable Trucksis Enterprises 634.95 Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 5 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
5 Invoice Date Description Amount.
12823 06/28/2022 City of Marina 634.95
Check 08/05/2022 100492 Accounts Payable United Parcel Service 21.45 Invoice Date Description Amount.
00008Y4481282 07/09/2022 Shipping fees to Art Black 21.45 Check 08/05/2022 100493 Accounts Payable Verde Design, Inc. 47,954.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
3-2121700 06/30/2022 Dunes Park Rough Grading Plan & Site Survey 47,954.00 Check 08/05/2022 100494 Accounts Payable Verizon Wireless 2,243.91 Invoice Date Description Amount.
9910781496 07/20/2022 Verizon 308174766-0001 293.59
9911401031 07/18/2022 Acct #272493672-00001 1,551.33
9911993768 07/25/2022 Acct# 371782403-00002 - FD Mobile Charges, June 26 - July 25 22 398.99 Check 08/05/2022 100495 Accounts Payable Xerox Financial Services 239.26 Invoice Date Description Amount.
3392817 07/28/2022 FD Monthly Copier Charges 239.26
Check 08/05/2022 100496 Accounts Payable Zoom Imaging Solutions 39.11 Invoice Date Description Amount.

IN2816239 07/18/2022 Maintenance Contract 39.11
EFT 08/05/2022 2457 Accounts Payable Richard B. Standridge 121042882 / 8312012522 3,610.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
22-15 07/29/2022 Service 7/18-28/2022 3,610.00
905 Chase - Checking Totals: Transactions: 38 $432,878.24 Checks: 37 $429,268.24
EFTs: 1 $3,610.00
Marina, CA LIVE
Payment Register - 8.5.2022
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/05/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 6 of 6 8/4/2022 10:55:19 AM
6 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
905 - Chase - Checking
Check
100497 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Ace Hardware $482.98 Invoice Date Description Amount
082687 08/04/2022 Fasteners, Tape, Cut off Wheel $64.96 082724 08/09/2022 Lighter, Flashlight, Push Broom $60.04 082721 08/09/2022 (4) Nozzle Twists, various sizes $45.84 082688 08/04/2022 Fasteners, Bolt and Cargo Strap $35.40 082703 08/05/2022 Fasteners $14.03
082708 08/06/2022 Misc items for new Fire Engine $193.21 082705 08/05/2022 Maxfit Power Bit & Fasteners $21.50
082709 08/06/2022 Station 2 knox box maintenance $44.73 082710 08/06/2022 Screw Driver $3.27
100498 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Ace Hardware $22.92 Invoice Date Description Amount
082661 08/02/2022 Cust. #116 $22.92
100499 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Ace Hardware $189.43 Invoice Date Description Amount
082611 07/27/2022 Airport Tools $110.16
082667 08/03/2022 Supplies $27.30
082659 08/02/2022 Tools $18.56
082698 08/05/2022 Shop Supplies $33.41
100500 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Ace High Designs Inc. $86.31 Invoice Date Description Amount
O1007089 08/03/2022 Cust #01956 $86.31
100501 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Advantage Gear $713.25 Invoice Date Description Amount
54465-1 06/09/2022 Uniform for D. Mendes $532.49
54574-1 06/14/2022 Uniform Pants $180.76
100502 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable Alert-All Corporation $1,195.20 Invoice Date Description Amount
222070308 08/03/2022 Fire Prevention Supplies for NNO $1,195.20 100503 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable American Supply Co. $2,395.86 Invoice Date Description Amount
0170530 07/27/2022 Shop Supplies $1,543.38
2974111 07/27/2022 Shop Supplies $852.48
100504 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable AmorerLink $2,900.00 Invoice Date Description Amount
1804434 06/06/2022 Annual Subscription & Mobile License 07/01/22 - 06/30/2023 and
$2,900.00
100505 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable ARC Document Solutions $282.96 Invoice Date Description Amount
2601430 07/20/2022 ARC 07/20/2022 $282.96
100506 08/12/2022 Open Accounts Payable AT & T $120.85
Invoice Date Description Amount
000018544021 07/28/2022 Fire Alarm Hgr 524/533 $47.16
000018544027 07/28/2022 AWOS Auto Weather Station $26.53 Thursday, August 11, 2022Pages: 1 of 11user: Rogah Satof Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022 Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
000018544022
07/28/2022
Fire Alarm Hgr 524/533
$47.16
100507
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Avaya, Inc.
$12.49
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2221532722
07/28/2022
Order #5160750
$10.30
2221540287
08/03/2022
Order #51630509
$2.19
100508
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
$27,700.72
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
318087
07/22/2022
BMI-Document Scanning
$2,112.12
318167
07/29/2022
BMI Imaging Systems-Document scanning
$25,588.60
100509
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
California Department of Toxic
Substance Control
$19,968.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
Aug2022 SVA DTSC
08/02/2022
Advanced Pmt Site #202420 HWCA FY21/22-022
$19,968.00
100510
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Carmel Fire Protection Associates
$600.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
122321
07/29/2022
Plan check and inspection for AT&T Cell Site, 3262
Imjin Road
$200.00
122320
07/29/2022
Plan check & inspection at Joby Modular Terminal, 761
Neeson
$200.00
122332
08/07/2022
Plan check and inspection for Mtry Business Park, 445
Reservatio
$200.00
100511
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Carmel Roasters, Inc.
$369.60
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
64655
08/10/2022
FD Coffee - 4 Boxes and filter
$369.60
100512
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Certified Folder Display Service, Inc.
$331.07
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
596504
08/01/2022
Distribution of Restaurant Guides - September 2022
$331.07
100513
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Cheryl Kent
$1,440.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2022-100
07/29/2022
Code Enforecement Investigations
$1,440.00
100514
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Cintas Corporation
$277.20
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
4127563132
08/05/2022
Mat Service - Police/Fire 08/05/22
$69.30
4123485902
06/24/2022
Mat Service - Police/Fire 06/24/22
$69.30
4124828008
07/08/2022
Mat Service - Police/Fire 07/08/22
$69.30
4126201260
07/22/2022
Mat Service - Police/Fire 07/22/22
$69.30
100515
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Community Human Services
$12,350.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
07-29-22
07/29/2022
CHS JPA Allocation - FY 2022-2023
$12,350.00
100516
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
East Bay Tire Co.
$176.95
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1855906
08/01/2022
Fire Engine 5411
$176.95
100517
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Emergency Vehicle Specialists
$674.53
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
14165
08/08/2022
Radio Antenna Replacement
$674.53
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 2 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100518
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Fastenal Company
$1,598.55
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
CASAL154026
07/20/2022
Shop Supplies
$574.67
CASAL154206
07/25/2022
Shop Supplies
$344.49
CASAL154234
07/28/2022
Shop Supplies
$679.39
100519
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
FedEx
$14.71
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
7-834-67346
07/29/2022
Acct #3995-9218-6
$14.71
100520
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
First Alarm
$585.73
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
696264
07/20/2022
Cust. #9537
$465.73
696453
07/22/2022
Building 527 741 Neeson Rd
$120.00
100521
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Forcible Entry, Inc.
$69,259.25
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0022-0134
07/03/2022
Forcible Entry Training Simulator
$69,259.25
100522
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
George T. Powell
$1,300.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08012022
08/01/2022
Parking Rental Fees
$1,300.00
100523
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Graniterock/Pavex Construction
$1,081.99
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1382335
07/16/2022
City Pot Holes
$1,081.99
100524
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Green Line
$1,426.43
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
70281
05/20/2022
Ramp Replacement
$1,426.43
100525
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Harris & Associates
$6,402.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
53784
08/09/2022
Harris & Associciates July 2022
$6,402.50
100526
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Tina Glass
$11.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
338
08/27/2022
BLS Provider Cards for Goncalves, Alvarenga & Suich
$11.00
100527
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
J.P. Cooke Company
$300.90
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
736700
08/03/2022
City of Marina Public Safety - Job #1239612
$70.00
736701
08/03/2022
City of Marina Public Safety - Job #1239599
$230.90
100528
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Kimley-Horn & Associates
$8,814.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
097789008-0622
06/30/2022
Imjin Parkway PS&E
$2,040.50
21785778
06/30/2022
Marina LRSP
$2,853.50
21764217
06/30/2022
2021 Dev Impact Fee
$2,299.50
097789008-0422
04/30/2022
Imjin Parkway PS&E
$1,621.00
100529
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
La Sirenita Tree Service
$485.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
07-26-22
07/26/2022
Windy Hill Park
$485.00
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 3 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100530
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Marina Coast Water District
$8,293.03
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
000056032 070722
07/07/2022
Cresent Ave/Costa Del Mar East Side
$60.52
000056084 070722
07/07/2022
Crescent/Shuler/Irrigation
$27.26
000056098 070722
07/07/2022
3254 Abdy Way (Tate Park Building)
$50.60
000056011 070722
07/07/2022
3254 Abdy Way (Tate Park Irrigation)
$632.39
012016000 072122
07/21/2022
199 A Paddon Place
$36.77
000056061 072122
07/21/2022
Reservation/Locke Paddon Park
$78.77
000056028 072122
08/02/2022
California at Jerry Court
$36.77
000056040 072122
07/21/2022
Hilo Ave
$27.26
000056006 072122
07/21/2022
188 Seaside Circle
$123.40
000056042 072122
07/21/2022
3040 Lake Drive
$89.02
000056090 072122
07/21/2022
Locke Paddon Park
$60.52
000056045 072122
07/21/2022
3100 Preston Drive
$6,642.03
000056046 072122
07/21/2022
3100 Preston Drive
$150.82
07-29-22
07/29/2022
Acct#000056041 - Water usage at Station 2
$276.90
100531
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Marisol Miranda
$250.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
09-10-22 vd
08/09/2022
Vince DiMaggio Refund
$250.00
100532
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable

MCCLEOA
$300.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
102
08/03/2022
2022-2023 MCCLEOA Dues - Chief Tina Nieto
$300.00
100533
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Michael Josselyn
$11,000.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
07-31-22
07/31/2022
Professional Services - MPWSP - July 2022
$2,875.00
06-30-22
06/30/2022
Professional Services - MPWSP - June 2022
$8,125.00
100534
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey Bay Air Resources District
$12,521.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0003119
07/29/2022
Per Capita Assessment FY 22-23
$10,728.50
1921-072922
07/29/2022
Airport Annual Renewal Invoice
$954.00
2796-072922
07/29/2022
Annual Renewal Invoice for Toxics
$839.00
100535
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey Bay Office Products
$380.20
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
479206138
08/03/2022
City Hall Copier Lease Payment - August 2022
$380.20
100536
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey County Convention &
Visitors Bureau
$20,500.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
16210
07/31/2022
Destination Marketing Investment - Q1
$20,500.00
100537
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey County Herald
$221.99
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
0006681939
07/08/2022
Legal Notice - Consolidation of Election
$221.99
100538
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
$16,927.34
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
25216A-IN
07/15/2022
Regular Ethanol
$6,322.98
25228A-IN
07/19/2022
Regular/Diesel Costs
$5,993.26
26433A-IN
07/29/2022
Regular Ethanol
$4,611.10
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 4 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100539
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey County Weekly
$240.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
07/21/22CCM
07/21/2022
Web Banner Ads Marina Sports Complex
$240.00
100540
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey One Water
$603.60
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
13-000183 073122
07/31/2022
4th Ave Dy Dr
$287.40
13-000325 073122
07/31/2022
2800 2nd Ave
$47.90
13-000143 073122
07/31/2022
3220 Imjin Rd
$28.80
12-003949 073122
07/31/2022
209 Cypress Ave
$95.80
12-003245 073122
07/31/2022
3254 Abdy Way
$47.90
12-001708 073122
07/31/2022
304 Hillcrest Ave
$47.90
12-003451 073122
07/31/2022
0 Seaside Ave & Reservation Rd
$47.90
100541
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Monterey Regional Waste
Management District
$181.30
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3646363
07/26/2022
East Salinas Ave
$51.80
3646334
07/26/2022
Salinas Ave East
$42.00
3650451
08/01/2022
Salinas Ave East
$63.70
3650885
08/02/2022
Salinas Ave East
$23.80
100543
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
My Chevrolet
$1,666.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
CVCS242906
02/01/2022
PD Cruiser 17 Caprice 4dr
$1,666.00
100544
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
NAPA Auto Parts
$143.10
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
921815
07/19/2022
Fire Engines
$143.10
100545
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
National Fire Protection-NFPA
$1,520.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
8175790X
08/09/2022
ID#2516553 National Fire Code Subscription Renewal
$1,345.50
8218782X
08/09/2022
ID#2516553 - Membership Renewal for Chief McCoun
$175.00
100546
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
New Image Landscape Co.
$2,140.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
138959
07/31/2022
Landscape Maintenance for July 2022
$2,140.00
100547
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Newton Bros. Tire & Auto
$559.89
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
434342
07/14/2022
PD Chevy Caprice 2014
$559.89
100548
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Office Depot
$296.28
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
254870030001
07/21/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$75.63
255000423001
07/20/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$180.23
255000704001
07/22/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$29.49
255688875001
07/19/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$10.93
100549
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Pacific Crest Engineering
$1,642.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
11129
07/31/2022
Glorya Jean Tate Park Site Improvements and Pump
Track
$1,642.50
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 5 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100550
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Pacific Gas & Electric
$21,449.34
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
483-6 June-July
07/15/2022
PG&E - 3982644483-6
$12,890.33
07-29-22
07/29/2022
Acct #2652040767-2
$223.36
June -July 313-6
08/08/2022
PG&E 6793435313-6
$8,335.65
100551
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Quill Corporation
$2,070.08
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
26488170
07/20/2022
Acct # 7474999
$289.60
26525262
07/22/2022
Acct # 7474999
$30.58
26427705
07/18/2022
Acct # 7474999
$583.20
26428454
07/18/2022
Acct # 7474999
$644.56
26614971
07/27/2022
Acct #7474999
$32.03
26585483
07/26/2022
Acct #7474999
$28.03
26568024
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$288.40
26576654
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$27.30
26582674
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$146.38
100552
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Sierra Springs & Alhambra
$232.11
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
9696351 073022
07/30/2022
Corp Yard
$124.28
7266038 080522
08/05/2022
Water Cooler Rental and Replacement Water
$107.83
100553
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
$177.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
223011
07/26/2022
Marina PD Field Training 7/11- 7/15
$177.00
100554
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Suburban Propane
$842.82
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1602-105488
04/01/2022
Yard Propane
$842.82
100555
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
SWCA Envrionmental Consultants
$8,601.69
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
147375
06/20/2022
SWCA-May 2022
$2,911.69
149288
07/26/2022
SWCA Vernal Ponds
$5,690.00
100556
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
TechRx Technology Services
$782.61
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
10325
08/02/2022
VariDesk and Dual Monitors Stands for AP Desk
$782.61
100557
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Tracnet
$11,908.16
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1074
06/01/2022
Marina PD Annual Maintenance 7/1/22 - 6/30/23
$11,908.16
100558
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
$2,911.64
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
478713712
07/28/2022
CDD Copier Lease Payment - August 2022
$216.32
478495799
07/26/2022
Customer Credit Acct #598296
$2,695.32
100559
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Underground Service Alert - USA
North 811
$425.40
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
120045USB22
07/26/2022
Dig Alert
$425.40
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 6 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100560
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
United Site Services
$260.35
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
114-13237046
07/15/2022
Windy Hill Park
$260.35
100561
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Vapor Cleaners, Inc.
$72.32
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
VO-070011891
08/01/2022
Dry cleaning for C. Vega Turnouts
$57.02
VO-07-011908
08/01/2022
Acct #VO1951 - Dry cleaning for C. Vega
$15.30
100562
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/13/2022
Accounts Payable
Veronica Tam & Associates, Inc
$2,235.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3139
07/20/2022
Veronica Tam and Associates June 1-June 30, 2022
$2,235.00
100563
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Veterinary Emergency& Specialty
Center
$185.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
104899
07/25/2022
Client ID 6107, Patient ID 60844
$185.00
100564
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP
$6,920.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2124903
04/30/2022
Visual Arts Building 040122-043022
$6,920.00
100565
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Wallace Group, Inc.
$57,278.56
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
56757
07/26/2022
Hayes Circle Two Lot Transfer
$192.00
56831
07/26/2022
Annual Resurfacing
$752.25
56854
07/26/2022
MLK Sculpture CDs
$3,880.21
56878
07/26/2022
Airport Fuel Farm 100LL Tank Replacement
$875.00
56879
07/26/2022
Airport Fuel Farm Backup Power
$218.75
56908
07/28/2022
Airport B533 Exterior
$3,728.04
56535
06/27/2022
Airport B533 Exterior CM
$8,665.70
56244
05/28/2022
Airport B533 Exterior
$2,251.36
56900
07/28/2022
Program Management
$36,715.25
100566
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Zoom Imaging Solutions
$255.63
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
IN2830082
07/25/2022
City of Marina
$255.63
100567
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Marina Employees Association
$135.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
24 - MEA Dues
$135.00
100568
08/12/2022
Voided/Reissued
Check Damaged
08/12/2022
Accounts Payable
Marina Professional Fire Fighters
Association
$300.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
35 - MPFFA Dues
$300.00
100569
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Marina Employees Association
$135.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
24 - MEA Dues
$135.00
100570
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Marina Professional Fire Fighters
Association
$300.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
35 - MPFFA Dues
$300.00
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 7 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100571
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
My Chevrolet
$1,666.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
CVCS242906
02/01/2022
PD Cruiser 17 Caprice 4dr
$1,666.00
100572
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
NAPA Auto Parts
$143.10
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
921815
07/19/2022
Fire Engines
$143.10
100573
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
National Fire Protection-NFPA
$1,520.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
8175790X
08/09/2022
ID#2516553 National Fire Code Subscription Renewal
$1,345.50
8218782X
08/09/2022
ID#2516553 - Membership Renewal for Chief McCoun
$175.00
100574
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
New Image Landscape Co.
$2,140.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
138959
07/31/2022
Landscape Maintenance for July 2022
$2,140.00
100575
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Newton Bros. Tire & Auto
$559.89
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
434342
07/14/2022
PD Chevy Caprice 2014
$559.89
100576
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Office Depot
$296.28
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
254870030001
07/21/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$75.63
255000423001
07/20/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$180.23
255000704001
07/22/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$29.49
255688875001
07/19/2022
Office Supplies/Building
$10.93
100577
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Pacific Crest Engineering
$1,642.50
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
11129
07/31/2022
Glorya Jean Tate Park Site Improvements and Pump
Track
$1,642.50
100578
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Pacific Gas & Electric
$21,449.34
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
483-6 June-July
07/15/2022
PG&E - 3982644483-6
$12,890.33
07-29-22
07/29/2022
Acct #2652040767-2
$223.36
June -July 313-6
08/08/2022
PG&E 6793435313-6
$8,335.65
100579
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Quill Corporation
$2,070.08
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
26488170
07/20/2022
Acct # 7474999
$289.60
26525262
07/22/2022
Acct # 7474999
$30.58
26427705
07/18/2022
Acct # 7474999
$583.20
26428454
07/18/2022
Acct # 7474999
$644.56
26614971
07/27/2022
Acct #7474999
$32.03
26585483
07/26/2022
Acct #7474999
$28.03
26568024
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$288.40
26576654
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$27.30
26582674
07/25/2022
Acct # 7474999
$146.38
100580
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Sierra Springs & Alhambra
$232.11
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
9696351 073022
07/30/2022
Corp Yard
$124.28
7266038 080522
08/05/2022
Water Cooler Rental and Replacement Water
$107.83
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 8 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
100581
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
$177.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
223011
07/26/2022
Marina PD Field Training 7/11- 7/15
$177.00
100582
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Suburban Propane
$842.82
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1602-105488
04/01/2022
Yard Propane
$842.82
100583
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
SWCA Envrionmental Consultants
$8,601.69
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
147375
06/20/2022
SWCA-May 2022
$2,911.69
149288
07/26/2022
SWCA Vernal Ponds
$5,690.00
100584
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
TechRx Technology Services
$782.61
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
10325
08/02/2022
VariDesk and Dual Monitors Stands for AP Desk
$782.61
100585
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Tracnet
$11,908.16
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
1074
06/01/2022
Marina PD Annual Maintenance 7/1/22 - 6/30/23
$11,908.16
100586
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
$2,911.64
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
478713712
07/28/2022
CDD Copier Lease Payment - August 2022
$216.32
478495799
07/26/2022
Customer Credit Acct #598296
$2,695.32
100587
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Underground Service Alert - USA
North 811
$425.40
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
120045USB22
07/26/2022
Dig Alert
$425.40
100588
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
United Site Services
$260.35
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
114-13237046
07/15/2022
Windy Hill Park
$260.35
100589
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Vapor Cleaners, Inc.
$72.32
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
VO-070011891
08/01/2022
Dry cleaning for C. Vega Turnouts
$57.02
VO-07-011908
08/01/2022
Acct #VO1951 - Dry cleaning for C. Vega
$15.30
100590
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Veronica Tam & Associates, Inc
$2,235.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
3139
07/20/2022
Veronica Tam and Associates June 1-June 30, 2022
$2,235.00
100591
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Veterinary Emergency& Specialty
Center
$185.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
104899
07/25/2022
Client ID 6107, Patient ID 60844
$185.00
100592
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP
$6,920.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
2124903
04/30/2022
Visual Arts Building 040122-043022
$6,920.00
100593
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Wallace Group, Inc.
$57,278.56
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
56757
07/26/2022
Hayes Circle Two Lot Transfer
$192.00
56831
07/26/2022
Annual Resurfacing
$752.25
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 9 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
56854
07/26/2022
MLK Sculpture CDs
$3,880.21
56878
07/26/2022
Airport Fuel Farm 100LL Tank Replacement
$875.00
56879
07/26/2022
Airport Fuel Farm Backup Power
$218.75
56908
07/28/2022
Airport B533 Exterior
$3,728.04
56535
06/27/2022
Airport B533 Exterior CM
$8,665.70
56244
05/28/2022
Airport B533 Exterior
$2,251.36
56900
07/28/2022
Program Management
$36,715.25
100594
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Zoom Imaging Solutions
$255.63
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
IN2830082
07/25/2022
City of Marina
$255.63
Type Check Totals:
97 Transactions
$485,011.80
EFT
2480
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Marina Police Association-MPOA
$250.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
23 - MPOA Dues
$250.00
2481
08/12/2022
Open
Accounts Payable
Police Officers Association - POA
$1,350.00
Invoice
Date
Description
Amount
08-05-22
08/05/2022
25 - POA Dues
$1,350.00
Type EFT Totals:
2 Transactions
$1,600.00
905 - Chase - Checking Totals
Checks
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
71 $360,000.82
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
26 $125,010.98
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
97 $485,011.80
$0.00
EFTs
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
2 $1,600.00
$0.00
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 10 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Number
Date
Status
Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date
Source
Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount
Difference
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
2 $1,600.00
$0.00
All
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
73 $361,600.82
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
26 $125,010.98
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
99 $486,611.80
$0.00
Grand Totals:

Checks
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
71 $360,000.82
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
26 $125,010.98
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
97 $485,011.80
$0.00
EFTs
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
2 $1,600.00
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
2 $1,600.00
$0.00
All
Status
Count
Transaction Amount
Reconciled Amount
Open
73 $361,600.82
$0.00
Reconciled
0 $0.00
$0.00
Voided
26 $125,010.98
$0.00
Stopped
0 $0.00
$0.00
Total
99 $486,611.80
$0.00
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Pages: 11 of 11
user: Rogah Satof
Payment Register
Marina, CA LIVE
From Payment Date: 8/12/2022 - To Payment Date: 8/12/2022

Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Check 08/11/2022 100595 Accounts Payable Randy Koster 3,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount.
08-11-22 08/11/2022 Settlement Agreement 3,000.00
905 Chase - Checking Totals: Transactions: 1 $3,000.00
Checks: 1 $3,000.00
Marina, CA LIVE
AP Check Register 8.12.2022 - Settlement Check
Bank Account: 905 - Chase - Checking
Batch Date: 08/11/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 1 of 1 8/11/2022 3:44:23 PM
Bank Account: 921 - Chase - Successor Agency
Check 08/12/2022 91 Accounts Payable Keyser Marston Associates 3,772.50 Invoice Date Description Amount.
0037091 08/09/2022 Finance Administration July 2022 3,772.50 921 Chase - Successor Agency Totals: Transactions: 1 $3,772.50 Checks: 1 $3,772.50
Marina, CA LIVE
SA Register 8.12.2022
Bank Account: 921 - Chase - Successor Agency
Batch Date: 08/12/2022
Type Date Number Source Payee Name EFT Bank/Account
Transaction
Amount
User: Rogah Satof Pages: 1 of 1 8/11/2022 10:13:22 AM
Agenda Item: 8b(1)
City Council Meeting of
August 16, 2022

MINUTE
Tuesday, July 26, 2022 6:00 P.M. Open Session

SPECIAL MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK SUSTAINABLE

COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE FORMER

MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MARINA GROUNDWATER

SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY
Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556 In accordance with California Government Code §54953(e)(1)(A) and (C) and the Proclamation of a State of Emergency issued by Governor Newsom o n March 4, 2020, under the pro visions of Government Code §8625 related to the COVID -19 (coronavirus) pandemic, consistent with recommendations by State and local health officials regarding social distancing and in order to prevent an imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as determine d in Resolution 2022-94, public participation in City of Marina City Council public meetings shall be electronic only and without a physical location for public participation until the earlier of March 31, 2022, or such time as the City Counci l may adopt a resolution in accordance with Government Code §54953(e)(3). This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Access Media Productions (AMP) Community Television Cable 25 and on t he City of Marina Channel and on the i nternet at https://accessmediaproductions.org/

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISH MENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonpr ofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Cristina Medina Dirksen, David Burnett, Lisa Berkley, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Kathy Biala, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

4. OTHER ACTIONS:
a. City C ouncil adopting a Resolution determining that th e public interest and necessity demand the acquisition of a ladder truck and construction of certain municipal improvements, and their financing through the issuance of General Obligation Bonds and making findings relating thereto; and 1 MINUTES for Special City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 26, 2022 Page 2

Introduce and hold a first reading of an Ordinance ordering the submission of a proposition incurring bonded indebtedness to the qualified voters of the City of Marina at the general munic ipal election to be held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of a ladder truck and the construction of certain municipal improvement projects.

Council Questions: Is there any harm or downside to putting something on the measu re now and then doing a special election to in the fall? what are the pluses and minuses of trying and seeing versus and having to do it again? If we were to put it on the November election it would cost about 70 ,000 or $75,000, right? As to the consultants that you've spoken with since our last council meeting if anything was discussed regarding equity? Last time we had a public hearing on the bond measure Layne, you said that the ladder truck was determined not to be able to be on a bond measure and its very much part of your staff report so could you explain the change, please? If we open in California which of our current 2 stations would close ? Why can’t developer facility public impact fees from new development by used for fire stations, community centers etc. instead of requiring a bond? How are we doing on our response time for the northern neighborhoods, such as Cosky and Cardoza? Why should the northernmost residence pay for a bond , open up the station on California in June if they're still going to have substandard response time? Why didn’t the developers pay for the fire station if we need at Imjin and Californ ia and in the future why d oesn't the develop or pay for a new fire station out near Marina Station? What is the correct time on street maintenance? If we were to put the bond on the ballot this November or next year, or whenever we do it and we're very fortunate in passes with 67% of the vote or higher, h ow long before residents would start okay let's say $65 a year, or per $100,000 their assessed property value ? If we saw this coming with the development happening years ago were these needs ever forecasted and why is it now that we're in the situation ? What percentage of our property tax goes to the state for education? What you painted is a picture that we do not have the economic drivers to support our services, is that what you're saying? Having worked at other cities have there been instances, or do you know of any instances of cities, say outside of Silicon Valley or San Fran cisco that can support itself alone with its property taxes? Is what we’re asking an anomaly or is this a trend and necessary for most cities our size? If a bond measure passes, we get $65 from every property owner, where every $100,000 assessed value how much of that would go back to the city versus the State or the co unty? Is the city looking at any of the sta te’s surplus or grants? We already know the entitled Development Agreements, and probably Marina Station is going to be coming up soon, so that we have the Dune Sea Haven and Marina Station, we know, unless there's some kind of force majeure or something bad that really happens, we can sort of predict, based on the agreement when the new developments are going to come to bear can we not predict, b ased on that a general assessment of how, how much those that property tax rate is going to decrease? The latter truck, since it's on the bond measure That's not that shouldn't take like 2 3 years like with the building a station, for example, can we purc hase that like right away if we have this bond approved as o pposed to waiting 2 or 3 years , is it possible to get that need met? Where would we house the truck? If we put this on the ballot now, our hands are tied to the degree or this type of outreach we can do; can you tell us what we can do? If we were to go to the November ballot, 2022 would we have a consulting agency to help us or not? What is the first day that ma mail-in ballots start being cast ? I f we were to put ourselves in this position where we had 2 months to get everything done, how would that impact your ab ility to work on other large projects that you're working on ? If we engage with these consultants, and you are sure that they have said, if it's for a March election, that they will be on board with us at this moment is that correct ? If we said yes, we would like to do this in March, when do they start engaging?
Public Comments:
• John Laroco – First 1.5 million deficit spending congratulations first to the board for getting that down and running at an operating cost that's sustainable. What are our operating costs? Are we on a positive cash flow on that? Have We stopped city land sales to pay the bills? How many measures are the city homeowners currently paying for ? Does the city participate in the events around the Monterey Bay 2 MINUTES for Special City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 26, 2022 Page 3

area, such as car shows? Co mmented on current property taxes and asked what comes back to the city.

Asked about an amortization payment schedule over a 30 -year period for the bond. Asked about the city’s reserve accounts.
• Richardo Orbegosa – Commented about putting money into old buildings doesn't really get us anything long term. In favor of this even if it does increase our overall property values in terms of you know the better-quality city and it will also bring in groups like kids and seniors. Asked is there time for this to be well written, to work out legal kinks, to work out rebuttals, to work out design flaws in the language? • Les Martin – Great Discussion, and these requirements are extremely important . There's so much you can do with modernizing the building from your current revenue, but to get things up to modern code is really hard. Absolutely need these facilities. Expects 21st century facilities for my city . Issuing a bond for this long-term construction of these kind of projects is perfectly appropriate, not a sal es tax. The sales tax should be funding the maintenance of these facilities in the future . Spoke to neighbors in t he Dunes area and they will support this if it means a fire station just up the street. • Dr. Catina Smith – Thinks this bond measure fo r the cost of what we're going to be paying for it is phenomenal if you think about folks wanting to make their home her e in Marina. It’s an investment in that home. Spoke about the d raw it will have from other com munities into Marina. Commented on current city facility and l ooking forward to seeing the city with a senior center, a place where peo ple could get together to have live performances with bands to have a place that has a nice display of the culture we have here in town. to have green spaces . Thank you for being so thoughtful about what it is that you're putting forward, and I hope we can get this on the ballot soon. • Mike Owen – Wants the Council to appreciate that 39% in opposition not be surprised that they coalesce into a formal opposition and present an argument on the ballot measure . Comment ed on the outreach and guidance to the voters to educate them on this. Believes the city is shooting themselves in the foot if they're rushed to put this on the November ballot . Asked if this proposed ballot measure passes what ’s going to happen to the existing buildings? Commented on the photos Mayor Pro Tem Biala presented. • Pat Mahoney – In support of the bond measure but noted that there will be a strain on the residents who are on limited income. Will there be a deferment program for those who are low-income? • Liesbeth Visscher – good to hear more about Marina 's history . Helped to get three measures on the ballot for the 2018 election and learned how important it is to educate the residents. Hopes the city will consider special fees or waving fees for residents who cannot afford this extra t ax. Commented on the photos showe d by Mayor ProTem Biala . H opes that the bon ds will be placed on the b allot this November and is to help again.
• Linda Sanders – Noted that this is not the right time for a bond measure of this nature. There are many very positive things i n your bond, but the transparency just isn't there . Commented on inflation and seniors on fixed income. Spoke about the rise of constr uction costs over the last 50-years. No information has been given of the proposed buildings to fall under this bond. • John Sanders – Suggested Locke Paddon as an excellent site, there are many very positive things in your bond, but the transparency just isn't there . Noted that there have not been a ny public dialogue or meetings to get input about t his bond measure. Stated th at the i nformation in the packet is vague, misleading, and omitted the public facilities impact fee . Commented on the public surv ey and that it does not substitute for public engagement.
• Tommy Bolea – Commented on the public survey and it only bei ng in English. Asked if copies of the survey were a vailable to the public. Asked the following questions: if the bond does not pass wh at is Plan B? Does a fire truck have to always roll out on medical calls? Are there statistics from our police and fire in gaining funding from the county or state? Can Ad-hoc meetings be done to talk about raising 3 MINUTES for Special City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 26, 2022 Page 4

taxes? What was the cost of the surve y? What does Marina have in existing funds? Can we buy the existing ladder truck? Opposes the bond measure.
• Grace Silva-Santella – Thanked City Manager for his presentation, helped with a lot of questions she had. Worked on the bond measure that help ed secure and construct the Marin a Library. Spoke about who started raising the funds to purchase the land and the citi zens who came together and organized the movement to pass Measure R by almost 80% voter approval to build the library. Spoke about the FPPC new stringent rules on what cit ies can do to inform residents and w hat a v ote to move this forward would do. Thinks council should follow the lead of the residents, who worked very hard and over a long period of time to get our library built and that each Council members should appoint maybe 2 citizens to spend some time with the staff, to look at different options . Asked if do a special election, what percentage is $80,000 of a 50-million-dollar bond? Council should organize a citizens group to look at this thoroughly, move forward, but don't move forward before that. • Karen Andersen – Previously we had been talk ing about an average of $105 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, the current paperwork it's loo king more like $62 , $61.34 cents per $100 ,000 of assessed value, so, I’m wondering in what cases is it higher or lower? • Peter Le – Asked how the city will finance the construction of the second fire station ? Can the Council explain to me and the residents and living in the North parts of Marina, how can we benefit from the new station on Imjin and California? How can you justify us paying the taxes for that construction? Can the city manager explain how the assessment tax rate goes from $105 go to $75, and now $61. 00; what are the fact that it's lower these tax rates? what's the rough estimate of the interest the city would pay for the 50-million-dollar bonds?
• Mark Sweeney – Answered some of t he public’s questions relating to the Marina Fire De partment and its responses to calls; questions related to fire station one moving, which is not part of this bond . Spoke about Marina Fire Station 2, which is located out at the Marina Airport and is at the far extreme outside edge of the city's boundary and needs to be moved to. better serve the commun ity. Encourage anyone from the public to come by the fire stations and ask us these questions; ask us what we do on a day -to- day basis, why we respond to certain calls, and how this will benefit the community.

DELGADO/BIALA: THAT WE DO NOT PUT THIS ON THE NOVEMBER 2022 BALLOT,

BUT WE GIVE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO COME BACK TO US WITH THE NEXT STEPS

THAT THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE, AS WE CONSIDER POTENTIALLY DOING THIS IN THE NEAR FUTURE INSTEAD OF NOVEMBER 2022. 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

5. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:58 P.M.

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

ATTEST:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
4 August 11, 2022 Item No. 8e(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council August 16,2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 2-,

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE

CALIFORNIA AVENUE PED ESTRIAN CROSSING INSTALLATION
PROJECT.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is requested that the City Council consider

1. Adopting Resolution 202 2- approving advertising and call for bids for the execution of the California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project.

BACKGROUND:

On May 21 ,2019, the Marina City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-54 receiving and approving the 2019 -2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Included in the lis t of 2019 - 2021 CIP projects is the California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project.

The California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project is identified as a safety requirement due to the Sea Haven Development to allow pedestrian to access the walkway on the west side of California Avenue. This project is identified and part of the Seaside & Marina Safe Walking & Biking to School Plan.

On April 7, 2020, the City Council passed Resolution No. 2020 -30, approving a professi onal services agreement between the City of Marina and Wallace Group (WG) for Program Management, On-call Design and O n-call Construction Management, and Construction Inspection services for projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Airport Cap ital Improvement Program (ACIP).

On November 16, 2021 , the city Council passed Resolution No. 2 021-119 receiv ing and approving final budget document for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 and F Y 2022-23. FY 2021-22 includes appropriation of $370,000 for additional funding for this project.

ANALYSIS:

Staff issued an on-call work order for Wallace Group to design and prepare bidding documents (plans, specifications, and estimates) for the proposed pedestrian crossing. After evaluation of the site, a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) was recommended due to vehicular volume and speed limit along California Avenue. Site plans are shown in EXHIBIT A.

This project includes installation of a crosswalk and two new ADA compliant curb ramps on the southwest side of the intersection with a PHB and associated electrical system. In addition, work will require conform curb, gutter, and sidewalk, asphalt concrete pavement; pavement markings and striping and associated miscellaneous work for a complete and operational pedestrian crossing in accordance with bidding documents. Bidding documents are available for review at the office of the City Public Works Director.

1 FISCAL IMPACT:

This action, approving advertising and call for bids does not have fiscal impact. This is an approved CIP project with funding amount of $ 75,000 (FY 2019-2021) and $370,000 (FY 2021- 2022) for a total project funding of $445,000.

The Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for this project is $370,000. If an award is made for this project funding will come from CIP HSR 2005.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
This action, ap proving a dvertising and call for bids for the California Avenue P edestrian Crossing Installation Project is not a project under CEQA.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

Elvie Morla-Camacho, P.E., QSD/P
Project Management Services
Wallace Group
REVIEWED/CONCUR:

Brian McMinn, P.E., P.L.S.

Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Marina

Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE CALIFORNIA AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING INSTALLATION PROJECT.

WHEREAS, On May 21 ,2019, the Marina City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-54 receiving and approving the 2019-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Included in th e list of 2019-2021 CIP projects is the California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project; and

WHEREAS, The California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project is identified as a safety requirement due to the Sea Haven Development to allow pedestrian to access the walkway on the west side of California Avenue. This project is identified and part of th e Seaside & Marina Safe Walking & Biking to School; and

WHEREAS, On April 7, 2020, the City Council passed Resolution No. 2020 -30, approving a professional services agreement between the City of Marina and Wallace Group (WG) for Program Management, On -call Design and O n-call Construction Management, and Construction Inspection services for projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP); and

WHEREAS, On November 16, 2021 , the city Council passed Resolution No. 2021 -119 receiving and approving final budget document for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 and FY 2022-23.

FY 2021-22 includes appropriation of $370,000 for additional funding for this project; and

WHEREAS, Staff issued an on -call work order for Wallace Group to design and prepare bidding documents (plans, specifications, and estimates) for the proposed pedestrian crossing.

After evaluation of the site, a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) was recommended due to vehicular volume and speed limit along California Avenue . Site plans are shown in Exhibit 1; and

WHEREAS, this project includes installation of a crosswalk and two new ADA compliant curb ramps on the southwest side of the intersection with a PHB and associated electrical system. In addition, work will require conform curb, gutter, and sidewalk , asphalt concrete pavement ; pavement ma rking and striping and associated miscellaneous work for a comp lete and operational pedestrian crossing in accordance with bidding documents. Bidding documents are available for review at the office of the City Public Works Director; and

WHEREAS, this action, approving advertising and call for bids does not have fiscal impact. This is an approved CIP project with funding amount of $ 75,000 (FY 2019-2021) and $370,000 (FY 2021-2022) for a total project funding of $445,000. The Engineer ’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for this project is $ 370,000. If an award is made for this project funding will come from CIP HSR 2005; and

WHEREAS, that this action, approving advertising and call for bids for the California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation Project is not a project under CEQA.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina do es hereby approve the advertisement and call for bids for the construction of the California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation project.

3 Resolution No. 2022-
Page Two

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 16th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 CALIFORNIA AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING INSTALLATION

FOR THE

CITY OF MARINA

NO SHEET ID DESCRIPTION
1 T-1 TITLE SHEET
2 GN-1 GENERAL NOTES
3 PC-1 PROJECT CONTROL PLAN
4 DM-1 REMOVAL PLAN
5 C-1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
6 PD-1 PAVEMENT DELINEATION PLAN
7-9 E-1 TO E-3 PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON SYSTEM

AND ELECTRICAL DETAILS

FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE STANDARD DETAILS OF THE CITY OF MARINA AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATED 2018

C I T Y O F M A R I N A

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
612 CLARION COURT
T 805 544-4011 F 805 544-4294
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
www.wallacegroup.us

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

SURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONS

WATER RESOURCES

PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION

PLANNING

CIVIL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
®
SARAH M. HUFFMAN

C I V I L
No. 85233
AL
AT T
S
OFE C
A
O NRFI
I

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY
R
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

CIP No. HSR 2005

EXHIBIT A
5 OVERALL PROJECT LIMITS

CALIFORNIA AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING INSTALLATION
August 11, 2022
20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
0 EX-A
N

CITY OF MARINA

EXHIBIT A
6 July 7, 2022 Item No. 8f(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of August 16, 2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-,

RECOGNIZING A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS, RE -RATIFYING THE

PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR
NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND RE -AUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AND ITS CONSTITUENT BODIES FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 21, 2022, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 19 , 2022 , PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 202 2-, regarding the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §§54950-54963, hereinafter the “Brown Act”) making certain findings; and authorizing the City to continue to implement remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies for the period August 21 , 2022, through September 19, 2022.

BACKGROUND:

Government Code §54953(e) allows cities to continue to meet remotely during states of emergency proclaimed by the Governor under modified Brown Act requirements that are similar to but not identical to the rules and procedures established by the prior Executive Orders of Governor Newsom relating to the relaxation of certain Brown Act requirements during the COVID -19 pandemic.

Government Code §54953(e) authorizes local agencies to use teleconferencing without complying with teleconferencing requirement imposed by the Brown Act during a declared state of emergency when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing during the proclaimed state of emergency or when the legislative body had determined by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

At a special meeting held on October 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-104 regarding the Brown Act making certain findings, and authorizing the City to implement remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) for the period October 5, 2021 through November 4, 2021; subsequently on November 2, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021 - 113 extending that period until December 2, 2021 ; on November 16, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021-118 extending that period until December 16, 2021; on December 14, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021-134 extending that period until January 13, 2022; and on January 11, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution 2022-02 extending that period to February 10, 2022; and on February 1, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -13, extending that period until March 3, 2022; on March 1, 2022 Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-32, extending that period to March 31, 2022, on March 15, 2022 Resolution 2022-34; April 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022- 48, and on May 17, 2022 adopted Resolution No. 2022-54; on June 21, 2022 Resolution No. 2022- 78; on July 19, 2022, Resolution No. 2022 -94 extending the period during which remote 1 teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) to August 20, 2022.

ANALYSIS:

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21 which among other things rescinded his prior Executive Order N -29-20 and set the date of October 1, 2021, for public agencies to transition back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act.

As the Delta variants surged in California, the legislature took action to extend the COVID -19 exemptions to the Brown Act’s teleconference requirements, subject to some additional requirements. California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly-spreading Omicron variant . Assembly Bill 361 amended Government Code §54953 and allowed a local agency to use teleconferencing in any of the following circumstances without complying with certain Brown Act provisions:

1. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.

2. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

3. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote taken at a meeting held for the purpose described in 2 above, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

A local agency that holds a meeting under any of these circumstances would be required to follow certain requirements listed in the attached Resolution , in addition to giving notice o f the meeting and posting agendas as required under the Brown Act. These additional requirements are intended to protect the public’s right to participate in the meetings of local agency legislative bodies. The City of Marina adheres to the listed requirements.

Government Code §54953(e)(3) provides that if the state of emergency remains active for more than 30 days, a local agency must make the following findings by majority vote every 30 days to continue using the exemption to the Brown Act teleconferencing requirements:

● The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the emergency; and

● Either of the following circumstances exist: the state of emergency continue to directly impact the ability of members to meet safely in person or State or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing measures.

The goal of Government Code §5 4953 as revised by AB 361 is to improve and enhance public access to local agency meetings during the COVID -19 pandemic and future applicable emergencies by allowing broader access through teleconferencing options. The current version of Government Code §54953 became effective on September 16, 2021, with a sunset of the present version on January 1, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None identified.

2 CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible adoption of a resolution proclaiming a local emergency persists, re -ratifying the proclamation of a state of emergency by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020, and re-authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the City Council of the City of Marina and its constituent bodies for the period August 21, 2022, through September 19, 2022, pursuant to Brown Act provisions.

Respectfully submitted,

___________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA RECOGNIZING A

LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS, RE-RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND RE -

AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF MARINA AND ITS CONSTITUENT BODIES FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 21, 2022, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 19, 2022, PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS.

WHEREAS, the City of Marina is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies; and

WHEREAS, all meetings of City of Marina’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and

WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provision for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and

WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and

WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the jurisdictions that are within the City’s boundaries, caused by natural, technological or human-caused disasters; and

WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and

WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2021- 104 on October 5, 2021, Resolution 2021-113 on November 2, 2021, Resolution 2021-118 on November 16, 2021, Resolution 2021-134 on December 14, 2021, Resolution 2022-02 on January 11, 2022, Resolution 2022-13 on February 1, 2022, Resolution No. 2022-13 on March 1, 2022 , Resolution 2022-32, on March 15, 2022 Resolution 2022 -34; April 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -48, and on May 17, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-54; on June 21, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -78; on July 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-94 extending the period during which remote te leconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) to August 20, 2022; and

WHEREAS, as a condition of extending the use of the provisions found in section 54953(e), the City Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency that exists in the City, and the City Council has done so; and

WHEREAS, emergency conditions persist in the City, specifically, the March 4, 2020, proclamation by the Governor of a state of emergency in the State of California due to COVID-19 and the March 13, 2020, proclamation of a state of emergency in the City of Marina by the City Manager, as the City’s Director of Emergency Services, due to COVID-19 which was subsequently ratified by the 4 City Council on March 17, 2020, and after having been supplemented twice, and both proclamations of states of emergency remain in effect; and
Resolution No. 2022-
Page Two

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the County of Monterey Health Depar tment issued a Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies, attached hereto as Attachment 1; and

WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly-spreading COVID-19 Omicron variant and as of June 13, 2022, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rated the risk level for community transmission of COVID-19 in Monterey County as medium with a case rate of 29.9 individuals per 100,000 persons, as of June 13, 2022, a total of 750 persons have died of COVID-19 and 367 persons are reported as new cases currently suffering from COVID-19 with 27 persons reported hospitalized in Monterey County by the County Health Department; this situation has and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, and desires to recognize and affirm a local emergency exists and re-ratify the proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California and to recognize the County of Monterey Health Department’s recommendation regarding social distancing; and

WHEREAS, as a consequence of the local emergency persisting, the City Council does hereby find that the City Council and its constituent bodies shall continue to conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision (e) of section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall continue to comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953; and

WHEREAS, the City of Marina will continue to implement the following measures for meetings of its City Council and its constituent bodies:
● Allow the public to access the meeting and require that the agenda provide an opportunity for the public to directly address the legislative body pursuant to the Brown Act’s other teleconferencing provisions.

● In each instance when the local agency provides notice of the teleconferenced meeting or posts its agenda, give notice for how the public can access the meeting and provide public comment.

● Identify and include in the agenda an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call -in or an internet-based service option; the legislative body need not provide a physical location for the public to attend or provide comments.

● Conduct teleconference meetings in a manner that protects the statutory and constitutional rights of the public.

● Stop the meeting until public access is restored in the event of a service disruption that either prevents the local agency from broadcasting the meeting to the public using the call -in or internet-based service option or is within the local agency’s control and prevents the public from 5 submitting public comments (any action taken during such a service disruption could be challenged under the Brown Act’s existing challenger provisions).

Resolution No. 2022-
Page Three

● Not require comments be submitted in advance (though the legislative body may provide that as an option) and provide the opportunity to comment in real time.

● Provide adequate time for public comment, either by establishing a timed public comment period or by allowing a reasonable amount of time to comment.

● If the legislative body uses a third-party website or platform to host the teleconference, and the third-party service requires users to register to participate, the legislative body must provide adequate time during the comment period for users to register and may not close the registration comment period until the comment period has elapsed.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Affirmation that Local Emergency Persists . The City Council hereby reconsiders the conditions of the state of emergency in the City and proclaims that a local emergency persists throughout the City, and:
(a) On September 22, 2021, the County of Monterey Health Department issued a Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies; and
(b) California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly-spreading COVID-19 Omicron variant and as of June 13, 2022, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rated the risk level for community transmission of COVID -19 in Monterey County as medium with a case rate of 29.9 individuals per 100,000 persons, as of June 13, 2022, a total of 7 50 persons have died of COVID -19 and 367 persons are reported as new cases currently suffering from COVID-19 with 27 persons reported hospitalized in Monterey County by the County Health Department; and this has caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City.

Section 3. Re-ratification of Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency. The City Council hereby reconsiders and re-ratifies the Governor of the State of California’s Proclamation of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2020.

Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The City Manager and legislative bodies of the City of Marina, the City Council and its constituent bodies, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, continuing to conduct open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 5. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect on immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) August 20, 2022, or such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the City Council of the City of Marina and its constituent bodies may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953. 6 Resolution No. 2022-
Page Four

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held this 16th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_____________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

7 ATTACHMENT 1
8 August 11, 2022, Item No. 8k(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of August 16, 2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 2-,

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MARINA AND AXIOM HOME TECH TO INSTALL THE

MARINA LIBRARY A UDIO-VISUAL SYSTEM, RECEIVING,
ALLOCATING, AND APPROPRIATING $7,500 FROM THE FRIENDS OF

MARINA LIBRARY (FOML), ALLOCATING AND APPROPRIATING
$11,000 TO THE PROJECT BUDGE T, AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS O N BEHALF OF THE

CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY

ATTORNEY, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE

CONTRACT TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT LIMIT UP TO AN
ADDITIONAL 10% OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT, AND

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY
ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 20 22-, approving a professional services agreement between the City of Marina and Axiom Home Tech to install the Marina Library AV System (EXHIBIT A); and

2. Receiving, allocating, and appropriating $7,500 from the Friends of Marina Library to the QLF2111 project budget; and

3. Allocating and appropriating $1 1,000 from the unallocated General Fund balance to the QLF2111 project budget; and

4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

5. Authorizing the City Manager to amend the contract to increase the contract limit up to an additional 10% of the contract amount in the event of material cost escalation; and

6. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

On November 3, 2004, the City Council approved an agreement between the City of Marina and the Monterey County Free Library for construction, operations, and maintenance of the new marina library.

The community room of the Marina library with 1292 (sq-ft) and capacity for 86 people, has been one the most popular locations for Marina residents over the recent years to hold public events including: movie events, music events, storytelling events, various public and agency meetings.

The room is equipped with a 120-inch drop down screen. However, lack of an appropriate audio- visual system including mounted projector, audio system, microphone, and other control equipment is limiting the extent and range of events in this room. 1 On Nov 16, 2021, the City Council approved and appropriated the budget for two years of the CIP projects including $50,000 to install an audio-visual system in the Marina Library.

On April 21, 2022, the City staff issued and sent a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to fifteen audio-visual installers. After the deadline for submitting RFQs, the City received only one proposal. Therefore, the City staff contacted installers via phone and emails to receive a sufficient number of proposals for this project.

Several site visits were conducted with interested audio-visual equipment installers over last three months to improve their proposals to make them as suitable as possible based on the City and library needs.

Representatives of Friends of Marina Library (FoML) participated in all meetings, site visits, and helped the staff throughout all of the process for selecting the qualified consultant.

ANALYSIS:

City staff received proposals from Axiom Home Tech (EXHIBIT B), AVI SPL, AVI Systems, ICS, and MJ Communications.

On July 28, 2022, an evaluation panel including City staff and representative of FoML evaluated the proposals and Axiom Home Tech was selected as the most qualified firm. The total cost of the Axiom proposal is $56,741.57. This proposal includes a new screen (which will increase the screen size from 120 inch to 150 inch diagonal), a 6000 lumen laser projector, sound system with 26 speakers, 4 microphones, one DVD/CD player, two remote controls, and connection ports (VGA, HDMI, AppleTV, and Chromecast).

Additional electrical outlets will be installed under the general building improvement on -call contractor, William Thayer A. Construction Inc . City staff anticipates $5,000 for the electrical work which will not be included in the agreed upon work with Axiom Home Tech.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Axiom proposal plus the cost of electrical work is $61,741.57. City staff recommends a 10% contingency for the project budget due to inflation and increasing costs due to supply chain delays through the construction time. The total cost of installatio n and contingency is anticipated to be $67,915.

The City Council appropriated $50,000 in the Capital Improvement Program budget for FY 2021- 2022 for this project. The FoML has agreed to donate $7,500 to the City of Marina for delivering the Marina Librar y AV System project. Therefore, the staff recommends allocation and appropriation of $11,000 from the unallocated General Fund balance to the QLF2111 project budget.

Monterey County Free Libraries and FoML will maintain the AV equipment once installed.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Saber Messhenas, E.I.T.

Assistant Civil Engineer / Department of Public Works
City of Marina

2 REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Brian McMinn, P.E., P.L.S.

Public Works Director & City Engineer
City of Marina

____________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MARINA AND

AXIOM HOME TECH TO INSTALL THE MARINA LIBRARY AUDIO-VISUAL SYSTEM, RECEIVING, ALLOCATING, AND APPROPRIATING $7,500 FROM THE

FRIENDS OF MARINA LIBRARY (FOML), ALLOCATING AND APPROPRIATING $11,000 TO THE PROJECT BUDGET, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL

REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO AMEND THE CONTRACT TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT LIMIT UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 10% OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT, AND AUTHORIZING

THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND
BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

WHEREAS, The community room of the Marina library with 1292 (sq -ft) and capacity for 86 people, has been one the most popular locations for Marina residents over the recent years to hold public events including: movie events, music events, storytelling events, various public and agency meetings. The room is equipped wit h a 120 -inch drop down screen. However, lack of an appropriate audio -visual system including mounted projector, audio system, microphone, and other control equipment is limiting the extent and range of events in this room; and

WHEREAS, on Nov 16, 2021, the City Council approved the budget for the CIP projects WHICH included $50,000 to install an audio-visual system in the Marina Library; and

WHEREAS, on April 21, 2022, the City staff issued and sent a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to fifteen audio-visual installers. After the deadline for submitting RFQs, the City received only one RFQ. Therefore, the City staff contacted installers via phone and emails to receive a sufficient number of proposals for this project; and

WHEREAS, several site visits were conducted with interested audio-visual equipment installers over last three months to improve their proposals to make them as suitable as possible based on the City and library needs; and

WHEREAS, representatives of Friends of Marina Library (FoML) participated in all meetings, site visits, and helped the staff throughout all of the process for selecting the qualified consultant; and

WHEREAS, City staff received proposals from Axiom, AVI SPL, AVI Systems, ICS, and MJ Communications. On July 28, 2022, an evaluation panel including City staff and representative of FoML evaluated the proposals and Axiom Home Tech was selected as the most qualified firm.

The total cost of the Axiom proposal is $56,741.57. This proposal includes a new scree n (which will increase the screen size from 120 inch to 150 inch diagonal), a 6000 lumen laser projector, sound system with 26 speakers, 4 microphones, one DVD/CD player, two remote controls, and connection ports (VGA, HDMI, AppleTV, and Chromecast); and

WHEREAS, additional electrical outlets will be installed under the general building improvement on-call contractor, William Thayer A. Construction Inc. City staff anticipates $5,000 for the electrical work which will not be included in the agreed upon work with Axiom Home Tech; and

4 Resolution No. 2022-
Page Two

WHEREAS, the Axiom proposal plus the cost of electrical work is $61,741.57. City staff recommends a 10% contingency for the project budget due to inflation and increasing costs due to supply chain delays through the constru ction time. The total cost of installation and contingency is anticipated to be $67,915; and

WHEREAS, The City Council appropriated $50,000 in the Capital Improvement Program budget for FY 2021-2022 for this project. The FoML has agreed to donate $7,500 to the City of Marina for delivering the Marina Library AV System project. Therefore, the staff recommends allocation and appropriation of $11,000 from the unallocated General Fund balance to the QLF2111 project budget,

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve a professional services agreement between the City of Marina and Axiom Home Tech to install the Marina Library AV System (Exhibit A); and

2. Receive, allocat e, and appropriat e $7,500 from the Friends of Marina Library to the QLF2111 project budget; and

3. Allocate and appropriat e $11,000 from the unallocated General Fund balance to the QLF2111 project budget; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and.

5. Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract to increase the contract limit up to an additional 10% of the contract amount in the event of material cost escalation; and

6. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

PASSES AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th day of August 2022 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
5 CITY OF MARINA

AGREEMENT FOR AUDIO-VISUAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on , 2022, by and between the City of Marina, a California charter city, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Axiom Home Tech, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor." City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as "party" and collectively as "parties" in this Agreement.

Recitals
A. City desires to retain Contractor for audio-visual equipment installation services for the Marina Library Community Audio-Visual Equipment Upgrade Project, hereinafter referred to as the "Project."
B. Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and personnel necessary to properly perform the services as set forth herein.

C. Consultant represents that it has the degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Codes §§37103 and 53060 and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated.

D. City desires to retain Contractor to provide such services.

Terms and Conditions
For of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Contractor agree to the following terms and conditions:

1. Scope of Work.
(a) Contractor is hereby hired and retained by the City to work in a cooperative manner with the City to fully and adequately perform those services set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Scope of Work”) and by this reference made a part hereof. With prior written notice to Contractor, City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Work at its sole discretion. (b) Contractor shall perform all such work with skill and diligence and pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of performance. Contractor shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for work which fails to meet these standards and which is reported to Contractor in writing within sixty days of discovery. Should Contractor fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations under this Agreement, the City may render or undertake the performance thereof and the Contractor shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.
(c) If services under this Agreement are to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined in California Civil Code §2782.8(b)(2), design professional certifies that all design professional services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services described in Section 1(a). By delivery of completed work, design professional certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the professional standard of care in California. (d) Contractor is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all

EXHIBIT A
6 2

relevant conditions affecting performance of the work, including without limitation site conditions, existing facilities, soils, hydrologic, geographic, climatic conditions, applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and all other contingencies or considerations.

(e) City shall cooperate with Contractor and will furnish all information data, records and reports existing and available to City to enable Contractor to carry out work outlined in Exhibit “A." Contractor shall be entitled to reasonably rely on information, data, records and reports furnished by the City, however, the City makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any such information, data, records or reports available to it and provided to Contractor which were furnished to the City by a third party. Contractor shall have a duty to bring to the City's attention any deficiency or error it may discover in any information provided to the Contractor by the City or a third party.

2. Term of Agreement & Commencement of Work.

(a) Unless otherwise provided, the term of this Agreement shall begin on the date of its full execution and shall expire on June 30, 2023, unless extended by amendment or terminated earlier as provided herein. The date of full execution is defined as the date when all of the following events have occurred:

(i) This Agreement has been approved by the City's Council or by the board, officer or employee authorized to give such approval, and;

(ii) The office of the City Attorney has indicated in writing its approval of this Agreement as to form, and;

(iii) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of Contractor by the person or persons authorized to bind the Contractor hereto, and;

(iv) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of the City by the person designated to so sign by the City's Council or by the officer or employee authorized to enter into this Contract and is attested to by the Marina City Clerk.

(b) Contractor shall commence work on the Project on or by September 30, 2022. This Agreement may be extended upon written agreement of both parties.

Contractor may be required to prepare a written schedule for the work to be performed, which schedule shall be approved by the City and made a part of Exhibit A, and to perform the work in accordance with the approved schedule.

3. Compensation.

(a) City liability for compensation to Contractor under this Agreement shall only be to the extent of the present appropriation to fund this Agreement. For services to be provided under this Agreement City shall compensate Contractor in an amount not to exceed fifty-six thousand seven hundred forty-one dollars and fifty -seven cents, $56,741.57 in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Cost Estimate attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference

7 3

(b) Invoice(s) in a format and on a schedule acceptable to the City shall be submitted to and be reviewed and verified by the Project Administrator (see Section 5(a)) and forwarded to the City's Finance Department for payment. City shall notify Contractor of exceptions or dispute items and their dollar value within fifteen days of receipt. Payment of the undisputed amount of the invoice will typically be made approximately thirty days after the invoice is submitted to the Finance Department.

(c) Contractor will maintain clearly identifiable, complete and accurate records with respect to all costs incurred under this Agreement on an industry recognized accounting basis. Contractor shall make ava ilable to the representative of City all such books and records related to this Agreement, and the right to examine, copy and audit the same during regular business hours upon 24-hour's notice for a period of four years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

(d) Contractor shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work that is determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project but which is not included within the Scope of Work and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the prior written authorization.

(e) Expenses not otherwise addressed in the Scope of Services or the Fee Schedule incurred by Contractor in performing services under this Agreement shall be reviewed and approved in advance by the Project Administrator (Section 5(a)), be charged at cost and rei mbursed to Contractor.

4. Termination or Suspension.

(a) This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of a substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1) not less than ten days written notice of intent to terminate, and (2) provided an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.

(b) If termination for default is effected by the City, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due the Contractor at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the City because of the Contractor's default. If after the termination for failure of Contractor to fulfill its contractual obligations, it is determined that the Contractor had not failed to fulfill contractual obligations, the termination shall be deemed to have been for the convenience of the City.

(c) The City may terminate or suspend this Agreement at any time for its convenience upon not less than thirty days prior written notice to Contractor. Not later than the effective date of such termination or suspension, Contractor shall discontinue all affected work and deliver all work product and other documents, whether completed or in progress, to the City.

(d) If termination for default is effected by the Contractor or if termination for convenience 8 4

is effected by the City, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equitable adjustment for termination shall provide for payment to the Contractor for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by Contractor relating to written commitments that were executed prior to the termination.

5. Project Administrator, Project Manager & Key Personnel.

(a) City designates as its Project Administrator Public Works Director/City Engineer Mr.

Brian McMinn who shall have the authority to act for the City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his/her authorized representative shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement.

(b) Contractor designates _________________as its Project Manager who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. The Project manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term.

(c) Contractor war rants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement. Contractor, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City. Contractor has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the work under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Contractor may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event that City and Contractor cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause.

6. Delegation of Work.

(a) If Contractor utilizes any subcontractors other than those set forth in Exhibit A section 2, consultants, persons, employees or firms having applicable expertise to assist Contractor in performing the services under this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain City's prior written approval to such employment. Contractor's contract with any subcontractor shall contain a provision making the subcontract subject to all provisions of this Agreement. Contractor will be fully responsible and liable for the p a y m e n t , administration, completion, presentation and quality of all work performed. City reserves its right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

(b) If the work hereunder is performed by a design professional, design professional shall be directly involved with performing the work or shall work through his, her or its employees.

The design professional's responsibilities under this Agreement shall not be delegated. The design professional shall be responsible to the City for acts, errors or omissions of his, her or its subcontractors. Negligence of subcontractors or agents retained by the design professional is conclusively deemed to be the negligence of the design professional if not adequately corrected by the design professional. Use of the term subcontractor in any other provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to imply authorization for a design professional to use subcontractors for performance of any professional service under this Agreement.

(c) The City is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by a subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and the City. 9 5

7. Skill of Employees. Contractor shall ensure that any employees or agents providing services under this Agreement possess the requisite skill, training and experience to properly perform such services.

8. Confidential and Proprietary Information. In the course of performing services under this Agreement Contractor may obtain, receive, and review confidential or proprietary documents, information or materials that are and shall remain the exclusive property of the City. Should Contractor undertake the work on behalf of other agencies, entities, firms or persons relating to the matters described in the Scope of Work, it is expressly agreed by Contractor that any such confidential or proprietary information or materials shall not be provided or disclosed in any manner to any of Contractor’s other clients, or to any other third party, without the City’s prior express written consent.

9. Ownership of Data. Unless otherwise provided for herein, all documents, material, data, drawings, plans, specifications, computer data files, basis for design calculations, engineering notes, and reports originated and prepared by Contractor, or any subcontractor of any tier, under this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the City for its use in any manner it deems appropriate. Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or intellectual proper ty rights in favor of the City. Contractor shall provide two (2) sets of reproducible of the above-cited items, except for the computer data files which shall consist of one (1) set. Contractor shall use all reasonable efforts to ensure that any electronic files provided to the City will be compatible with the City's computer hardware and software. Contractor makes no representation as to long-term compatibility, usability or readability of the format resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems or computer hardware differing from those in use by the City at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall be permitted to maintain copies of all such data for its files. City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work and, should City use these products or data in connection with additions to the work required under this Agreement or for new work without consultation with and without additional compensation to Contractor, Contractor makes no representation as to the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Work and shall have no liability or responsibility whatsoever in connection with such use which shall be at the City's sole risk. Any and all liability arising out of changes made by the City to Contractor's deliverables is waived against Contractor unless City has given Contractor prior written notice of the changes and has received Contractor's written consent to such changes.

10. Conflict of Interest.

(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of the City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of the City in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall represent the interest of the City in any discussion or negotiation.

(b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor may be, as of the date of commencement of services under this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of 10 6

non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of the City relative to such projects. Any future position of the City on such projects may result in a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

(c) No official or employee of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making accepting or approving this Agreement, during the term of his or her tenure or service with City and for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

11. Disclosure. Contractor may be subject to the appropriate disclosure requirements of the California Fair Political Practices Act, as determined by the City Manager.

12. Non-Discrimination.

(a) During the performance of this Agreement the Contractor shall comply with the applicable nondiscrimination and affirmative action provisions of the laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City. In performing this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate, harass, or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), age, marital status, denial of family and medical care leave and denial of pregnancy disability leave. Contractor shall give written notice of its obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which it has a collective bargaining or other agreement.

(b) Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this Section in all subcontracts.

13. Indemnification & Hold Harmless.

(a) Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which shall be solely as addressed by subsection (b) below, and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless City, its Council, boards, commissions, e mployees, officials and agents ("Indemnified Parties" or in the singular "Indemnified Party") from and against any claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs including but not limited to reasonable attorney=s fees, court costs, expert witness fees and costs of alternate dispute resolution (collectively "Liabilities“), where same arise out of the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, its officers, employees, agents and sub-contractors. The Contractor’s obligation to indemnify applies unless it is adjudicated that its liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally adjudicated that liability is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party, the Contractor’s obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party.

11 7

(b) To the fullest extent permitted by law (including without limitation California Civil Code Sections 2782.8), when the services to be provided under this Agreement are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under said section 2782.8, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless City and any Indemnified Party for all Liabilities regardless of nature or type that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, or the acts or omissions of an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of the Contractor. The Contractor’s obligation to indemnify applies unless it is adjudicated that its liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally adjudicated that liability is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party, the Contractor’s obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party.

(c) All obligations under this section are to be paid by Contractor as incurred by City.

The provisions of this Section are not limited by the provisions of sections relating to insurance including provisions of any worker's compensation act or similar act. Contractor expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statues or laws as to City, its employees and officials.

Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every subcontractor, sub tier contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance or subject matter of this Agreement. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder.

(d) If any action or proceeding is brought against any Indemnified Party by reason of any of the matters against which the Contractor has agreed to defend the Indemnified Party, as provided above, Contractor, upon notice from the City, shall defend any Indemnified Party at Contractor's expense by counsel reasonably acceptable to the City. An Indemnified Party need not have first paid for any of the matters to which it is entitled to indemnification in order to be so defended.

(e) This obligation to indemnify and defend City, as set forth herein, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section.

14. Insurance.

(a) As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement and without limiting Contractor's indemnification of the City, Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect at its own expense the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” attached hereto and made a part hereof. Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, manually autographed in ink by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, along with copies of all required endorsements. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney and Risk Manager as to form and content.

Specifically, such insurance shall: (1) protect City as an additional insured for commercial general and business auto liability; (2) provide City at least thirty days written notice of cancellation, material reduction in coverage or reduction in limits and ten days written notice for non-payment of premium; and (3) be primary with respect to City's insurance program. Contractor's insurance is not expected to respond to claims that may arise from the acts or omissions of the City.

(b) City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required herein by giving Contractor ninety days advance written 12 8

notice of such change. If such change should result in substantial additional cost of the Contractor, City agrees to negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City.

(c) All required insurance must be submitted and approved the City Attorney and Risk Manager prior to the inception of any operations by Contractor.

(d) The required coverage and limits are subject to availability on the open market at reasonable cost as determined by the City. Non availability or non affordability must be documented by a letter from Contractor's insurance broker or agency indicating a good faith effort to place the required insurance and showing as a minimum the names of the insurance carriers and the declinations or quotations received from each. Within the foregoing constraints, Contractor's failure to procure or maintain required insurance during the entire term of this Agreement shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement under which City may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance to protect City's interests and pay any and all premium in connection therewith and recover all monies so paid from Contractor.

(e) By signing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 et seq., of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provision of that Code, and that it will comply with such provisions at all such times as they may apply during the performance of the work pursuant to this Contract. Unless otherwise agreed, a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City is required.

15. Independent Contractor. The parties agree that Contractor, its officers, employees and agents, if any, shall be independent contractors with regard to the providing of services under this Agreement, and that Contractor's employees or agents shall not be considered to be employees or agents of the City for any purpose and will not be entitled to any of the benefits City provides for its employees. City shall make no deductions for payroll taxes or Social Security from amounts due Contractor for work or services provided under this Agreement.

16. Claims for Labor and Materials. Contractor shall promptly pay when due all amounts payable for labor and materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, so as to prevent any lien or other claim under any provision of law from arising against any City property (including reports, documents, and other tangible matter produced by the Contractor hereunder), against the Contractor's rights to payments hereunder, or against the City, and shall pay all amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such labor.

17. Discounts. Contractor agrees to offer the City any discount terms that are offered to its best customers for the goods and services to be provided herein, and apply such discounts to payment made under this Agreement which meet the discount terms.

18. Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

13 9

19. Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises between the parties as to proper interpretation or application of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter between themselves. If the dispute is not resolved by meeting and conferring, the matter shall be submitted for formal mediation to a mediator selected mutually by the parties.

The expenses of such mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. If the dispute is not or cannot be resolved by mediation, the parties may mutually agree (but only as to those issues of the matter not resolved by mediation) to submit their dispute to arbitration. Before commencement of the arbitration, the parties may elect to have the arbitration proceed on an informal basis; however, if the parties are unable so to agree, then the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding, unless within thirty days after issuance of the arbitrator’s written decision, any party files an action in court. Venue and jurisdiction for any such action between the parties shall lie in the Superior Court for the County of Monterey.

20. Compliance With Laws.

(a) Each party's performance hereunder shall comply with all applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City including but not limited to laws regarding health and safety, labor and employment, wage and hours and licensing laws which affect employees. This Agreement shall be governed by, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Contractor shall comply with new, amended or revised laws, regulations or procedures that apply to the performance of this Agreement.

(b) If the Project is a "public work," or prevailing wages are otherwise required, Contractor shall comply with all provision of California Labor Code section 1720 et seq., as applicable, and laws dealing with prevailing wages, apprentices and hours of work., etc.

(c) Contractor represents that it has obtained and presently holds all permits and licenses necessary for performance hereunder, including a Business License required by the City's Business License Ordinance. For the term covered by this Agreement, the Contractor shall maintain or obtain as necessary, such permits and licenses and shall not allow them to lapse, be revoked or suspended.

21. Assignment or Transfer. This Agreement or any interest herein may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred, either directly or by operation of law, without the prior written consent of the City. Any att empt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

22. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, sent by facsimile ("fax") or certified mail, postage prepaid with return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: City Manager
City of Marina City Hall
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Fax: (831) 384-9148

14 10

To Contractor: Axiom Home Tech
501 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite 300
Monterey, California 93940

Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three days after deposit in the custody of the U.S. Postal Service. A copy of any notice sent as provided herein shall also be delivered to the Project Administrator and Project Manager.

23. Amendments, Changes or Modifications. This Agreement is not subject to amendment, change or modification except by a writing signed by the authorized representatives of City and Contractor.

24. Force Majeure. Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, neither Contractor nor City shall be held responsible or liable for failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement if such failure shall be due to causes beyond Contractor's or the City's control. It is understood and agreed to by the Contractor and the City that they cannot, and will not, claim Force Majeure based on an economic downturn of any type. Such causes include but are not limited to:
strike, fire, flood, civil disorder, act of God or of the public enemy, act of the federal government, or any unit of state of local government in either sovereign or contractual capacity, epidemic, quarantine restriction, or delay in transportation to the extent that they are not caused by the party's willful or negligent acts or omissions, and to the extent that they are beyond the party's reasonable control.

25. Attorney's Fees. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and costs.

26. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to affect the limitation on assignment.

27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective party.

28. Waiver. A waiver of a default of any term of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding default or as a waiver of the provision itself. A party's performance after the other party's default shall not be construed as a waiver of that default.

29. Severability. Should any portion of this Agreement be determined to be void or unenforceable, such shall be severed from the whole and the Agreement will continue as modified.

30. Construction, References, Captions. Since the parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not workdays. The captions of the various sections are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

15 11

31. Advice of Counsel. The parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor or against either party by reason of the extent to which each party participated in the drafting of this Agreement.

32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

33. Time. Time is of the essence in this contract.

34. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters as set forth in this Agreement, and no other agreement, statement or promise made by or to any party or by or to any employee, officer or agent of any party, which is not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Contractor and the City by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement, on the date first set forth above, at Marina, California.

CITY OF MARINA CONTRACTOR

By: By:

Name: Layne Long Name:

Its: City Manager Its:

Date: Date:

Approved as to form:

By:

City Attorney
16 C-1

Exhibit C - Insurance

Contractor agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. If Contractor uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to ame nd, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, manually autographed in ink by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves its right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The following coverage will be provided by Contractor and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.

Commercial General Liability (primary). Commercial general liability insurance covering Contractor's operations (and products where applicable) is required whenever the City is at risk of third party claims which may arise out of Contractor's work or presence on City premises. Contractual liability coverage is a required inclusion in this insurance.

Primary insurance shall be provided on ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88 or on an ISO or ACORD form providing coverage at least as broad as ISO form CG 00 01 10 01 and approved in advance by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Total limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for all coverages. If commercial general liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Project or the general aggregate limit shall be two million dollars ($2,000,000). Contractor must give written notice to the City of any pending claim, action or lawsuit which has or may diminish the aggregate.

If any such claim or lawsuit exists, Contractor shall be required, prior to commencing work under this Agreement, to restore the impaired aggregate or prove it has replacement insurance protection to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Risk Manager.

City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 11 85 or forms CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01. Coverage shall apply on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to the City or any agent of City. Coverage is not expected to respond to the claims which may arise from the acts or omissions of the City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Coverage shall contain no contractors' limitation endorsement. There shall be no endorsement or modification limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground property damage or employment-related practices.

Umbrella Liability Insurance. Umbrella liability insurance (over primary) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, contractual liability and completed operations at a minimum, and shall be in an amount of not less than two mission dollars ($2,000,000), and include a “drop down” provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverag e shall be following form to any underlying coverage.

Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion and no contractor's limitation endorsement. Policies limits shall be not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in the aggregate, above any limits required in the underlying policies shall have starting and ending dates concurrent with the underlying coverage.
17 C-2

Business Auto. Automobile liability insurance is required where vehicles are used in performing the work under this Agreement or where vehicles are driven off-road on City premises, it is not required for simple commuting unless City is paying mileage. Ho wever, compliance with California law requiring auto liability insurance is a contractual requirement.

If automobile insurance is required for work under this Agreement, primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or on an ISO or ACORD form providing coverage at least as broad as CA 00 01 10 01 approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Coverage shall be endorsed to stated that the City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be added as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor or for which the Contractor is respo nsible. Limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Contractor owns no autos, a non -owned auto endorsement to the commercial general liability policy described above is acceptable.

Workers’ Compensation/Employers’ Liability. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability insurance are not required for single-person contractors. However, under California law these coverages (or a copy of the State's Consent to Self-Insure) must be provided if Contractor has any employees at any time during the period of this Agreement. Policy(s) shall be written on a policy form providing workers’ compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employers’ liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident or disease and shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, policy(s) shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

Property Insurance. Property insurance, in a form and amount approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager, is required for Contractors having exclusive use of premises or equipment owned or controlled by the City. City is to be named a Loss Payee As Its Interest May Appear in property insurance in which the City has an interest, e.g., as a lien holder. Fire damage legal liability is required for persons occupying a portion of City premises.

Errors and Omissions/Professional Liability. Errors and Omissions or professional liability coverage appropriate to Contractor's profession is required, in a form and amount approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Such insurance shall be in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in annual aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such insurance in place for a period of five years following compl etion of work or services provided under this Agreement. Such continuation coverage may be provided by one of the following: (1) renewal of the existing policy; (2) an extended reporting period endorsement; or (3) replacement insurance with a retroactive date no later than commencement of the work or services under this Agreement.

Contractor and City further agree as follows:

a) This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit.

b) Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are inten ded to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such.

18 C-3

c) All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this Agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.

d) Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not inte nded as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.

e) For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or toward performance of this Agreement.

f) All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement, shall not prohibit Contractor, Contractor’s employees, or agents from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contractor hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the City.

g) Unless otherwise approved by City, Contractor’s insurance shall be written by insurers authorized and admitted to do business in the State of California with a minimum “Best’s” Insurance Guide Rating of “A:VII.” Self -insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.

h) In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Contractor.

i) Contractor agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City Attorney and Risk Manager, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional endorsement to Contractor’s general liability and umbrella liability policies using ISO form CG 20 10 11 85. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide at least thirty days written notice of cancellation, material reduction in coverage or reduction in limits and ten days written notice for non -payment of premium. Contractor agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word “endeavor” with regard to any notice provisions. Contractor agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City within ten days of City's request for said copies.

j) Contractor shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage.

Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

k) Any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard.

l) Contractor agrees to require all subcontractors or other parties hired for this Project to provide workers' compensation insurance as required herein and general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Contractor agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage 19 C-4

and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Contractor agrees to require that no contract used by any subcontractor, or contracts Contractor enters into on behalf of City, will r eserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this Agreement.

Contractor agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom Contractor contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Contractor acknowledges that such contracts or agreements may require modification if the insurance requirements do not reflect the requirements herein. Failure of City to request copies of such agreements will not impose any liability on City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

m) If Contractor is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, ag ents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

n) Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contractor that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve the City.

o) Coverage will not be limited to the specific location or individual entity designated as the address of the Project. Contractor agrees to have its coverage endorsed so that all coverage limits required pursuant to this requirement are available separately for each and every location at which Contractor conducts operations of any type on behalf of City. Contract or warrants that these limits will not be reduced or exhausted except for losses attributable to those specific locations and not by losses attributable to any other operations of Contractor.

p) Contractor agrees not to attempt to avoid its defense and i ndemnity obligations to City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers by using as a defense Contractor's statutory immunity under workers' compensation or similar statutes.

r) Contractor agrees to ensure that coverage provided to meet these requirements is applicable separately to each insured and that there will be no cross liability exclusions that preclude coverage for suits between Contractor and City or between City and any other insured or Named Insured under the policy, or between City and any party associated with City or its employees.

s) Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability, and if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance, with a limit of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence for at least three years following substantial completion of the work.

u) City reserves the right to modify the insurance requirements set forth herein in accordance with the terms of any specific Service Order issued as provided by the Agreement. 20 Axiom Home Tech
501 Lighthouse Ave., Suite 300
Monterey, CA 93940
+1 8316459900

ESTIMATE

ADDRESS
Marina Public Library
190 Seaside Circle
Marina, CA 93933

SHIP TO
Marina Public Library
Marina Public Library
190 Seaside Circle
Marina, CA 93933
ESTIMATE # 4297REV4
DATE 08/10/2022

DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT
Project Scope:

Axiom Home Tech will supply and install an A/V system that will work for both conference type presentations and film viewing. The room will feature powerful, immersive surround sound for movie night and with a press of a button, the system will convert itself for uniform coverage of sound, where each speaker output is the same signal, ideal for a microphone presentation.

Notes:

This system will include high quality video projection, motorized drop screen, amplification, loud speakers and an easy to use remote control.

Axiom will hire a sub-contractor (California Acoustics) to replace framing and ceiling tiles in the front of the room to create a channel for passage of the video screen. The case for the motorized screen will be installed above the drop ceiling. Axiom technicians will remove the existing screen and enclosure, to be recycled at the Marina e-waste facility. 1 3,000.00
HDMI & VGA & analog audio connection plates will be placed at both the front and back of the room for a presenter to interface with using their laptop computer, and for the setup of the microphone system and mixing board. Additionally, an Apple TV and a Chromecast device will be provided for streaming video content and for displaying the desktop of a Macbook or PC laptop, wireless.

Existing cabinetry will be modified for an active ventilation system, to keep electronics cool. 2 hours of training will be provided on how to navigate/control the system and remote control.

Projection and Video Sources:

Epson EB-PU1006W WUXGA 3LCD Laser Projector with 6000 Lumens & 4K Enhancement 1 6,790.00T EPSON Middle Throw Lens #1 for Pro G7000 and Pro L1100U/1200U/1300U/1405U 1 370.00T Chief CMA-115 6" Ceiling Plate With 1-1/2" NPT Opening 1 59.00T

EXHIBIT B
21 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT
Chief Universal Fixed Projector Mount 1 250.00T
Da-Lite Tensioned Contour Electrol Drop Screen with HD Progressive 1.3 Perforated Screen Material, Custom Dimensions- 146' Diagonal, Screen width 134.5", Case with Width 158" (MSRP $6,790)
1 5,999.00T
PF Power MIW 1 Gang In-wall surge protector--installed by electrician 1 59.95T AVPro AC-EX70-444-KIT Ultra Slim 70m (100m HD) 4K60 HDR HDBaseT Extender Kit 1 1,208.90T AV PRO AC-EX70-UHD-KIT Ultra Slim 4K UHD HDMI Extender Kit 2 1,317.80T SONY UBP-X1100ES UHD Blu-Ray player 1 599.00T
Apple TV 64 GB 4K 1 250.00
4K Chromecast Device 1 65.00T
Surround Sound Processing and Amplification:

Marantz 11.2 CH Full 4K Ultra HD Network AV Surround Preamplifier with HEOS & Amazon Alexa Voice Control
1 2,999.99T
Episode Response DSP 12 CH AMP w/100 Watts per Channel 2 3,799.98T EPISODE EPI-EA-AMP-SUB-1D-500R 500 Watt Subwoofer Amplifier 1 1,199.99T Cabinet Ventilation:

AC Infinity Airplate S5, 8" Home Theater Cabinet Cooling System 2 99.98T AC Infinity Controller 2 Thermal Fan Controller 2 119.98T AC Infinity Controller Stand 2 50.00T
Power Conditioning & Surge Protection:

WattBox KIT-WB-700-IPV-12 Power Conditioner with |12 Controlled Outlets 1 779.95T Speakers:

Monitor Audio CW280IDC In-Wall 3-way Speaker, Each 14 9,100.00T Monitor Audio CC-280IDC 8" In-ceiling 3-way Speaker, each 10 6,300.00T Episode ES-SUB-IW-DUAL8, Dual 8" In-wall Subwoofer 2 1,299.98T Remote Control:

Universal Remote Control MX-990 2 Way RF Remote Control 2 1,198.00T Universal Remote Control MRF-350 RF Base Station with RFX-250 Antenna 1 274.00T Home Theater Master MX-990 Standard Programming 1 349.99 Microphone System:
4 Channel UHF Microphone System w/ 2 handheld microphones and 2 Lapel microphones 1 500.00T 6 Channel Mixing Board 1 350.00T
Wire:

Windy City 16-4 Speaker Wire 1,000 800.00T
Windy City Wire Cat-6 Ethernet Cable 375 97.50T
Windy City RG-6 Subwoofer Signal Cable 150 34.50T
22 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT
Miscellaneous Materials & Labor:

Miscellaneous Installation Materials (ESTIMATE, to be billed for actual materials used) 1 700.00T Estimated Installation Labor 50 6,000.00
Merchandise Discount 1 -3,575.00

SUBTOTAL 52,447.49
TAX 4,294.08
TOTAL $56,741.57
Accepted By Accepted Date
23 Agenda Item: 8l(1)
City Council Meeting of
August 16, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING AN

AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE

MARINA STATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. (the "Development Agreement Statute") which authorizes cities to enter into agreements for the development of real property with any person having a legal or equitable interest in such property in order to establish certain development rights in such property; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Development Agreement Statute, the City of Marina (the "City") has enacted Chapter 4.04 of the Marina Municipal Code (the "Development Agreement Regulations") to implement procedures for the processing and approval of development agreements in accordance with the Development Agreement Statute; and WHEREAS, the City and Creekbridge Homes, LLC previously entered into that certain Development Agreement dated as of March 4, 2008 (the “Development Agreement”), pursuant to which the City and Developer agreed to certain matters with respect to the development of a mixed use project including 1320 residential units, approximately 60,000 square feet of retail space, approximately 144,00 square feet of office, approximately 652,000 square feet of industrial space as well as approximately 52 acres of open space and parks along with roadways and other infrastructure serving the development (the “Project”) on certain real property consisting of approximately three hundred twenty (320) acres , located in the northern section of the City of Marina (the “Project Site”), which is more particularly described in the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Creekbridge Homes, LLC elected not to proceed with the development of the Project in accordance with the Development Agreement and Creekbridge Homes, LLC's rights and obligations under the Development Agreement were assumed by the owner of the Property at the time, the Armstrong Family.

WHEREAS, The Armstrong Family subsequently sold the Property to Valle del Sol Properties, LLC a California limited liability company, the 2004 Ramirez Family Revocable Trust dated January 16, 2004 and Restated on June 14, 2013 and the Villam Legacy Irrevocable Trust dated October 16, 2017 (collectively the "Subsequent Owner"); WHEREAS, Subsequent Owner has entered int o an agreement with 3rd Millennium Partners, a California corporation ("3MP") to act as developer of the Property and the City has approved the assignment of the rights and obligations under the Development Agreement to 3MP pursuant to the terms of an Assi gnment and Assumption Agreement meeting the requirements of Article 5 of the Development Agreement;
WHEREAS, prior to its adoption of the Development Agreement, the City has approved a Specific Plan (the "Specific Plan) for the Project Site, General Plan Amendments (the "General Plan Amendments"), a Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments, a Vesting Tentative Map and certified an EIR (collectively the "Project Approvals"); and 1 Ordinance No. 2022-
Page Two
WHEREAS, the development of the Project has been delayed and the Developer has requested that the City approve an extension of the Development Agreement to account for those delays; and
WHEREAS, the City and Developer have negotiated the terms of the Amendment to the Development Agreement (the "Amendment") amending the terms of the Development Agreement; and

WHEREAS, on March 4, 2008, the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project (State Clearing House Number 2005061056) (the "Final EIR"); and WHEREAS, the complexity, magnitude and long term buildout of the Project would be difficult for Developer to undertake if the City had not determined, through the Development Agreement, to inject a sufficient degree of certainty in the land use regulatory process to justify the substantial financial investment associated with development of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Amendment to the Development Agreement will assure both the City and Developer that the Project can proceed without disruption caused by a change in City planning and development policies and requirements, which assurance will thereby reduce the actual or perceived risk of planning, financing and proceeding with construction of the Project and promote the achievement of the private and public objectives of the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65867 of the Government Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 8, 2021, on amending the Development Agreement consistent wit h the terms of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement during which public hearing the Planning Commission received comments from the Developer, City staff, and members of the general public; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the Plannin g Commission recommended approval of the Amendment to the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65867 of the Government Code, the City Council, on June 21, 2022, held a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment to the Development Agreement during which public hearings, the City Council received comments from the Developer, project consultants, City staff, and members of the general public; and

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. This Ordinance incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, the Development Agreement and the Amendment to the Development Agreement substantially in the form on file with the City Clerk as of the date of passage of this Ordinance, subject to the provisions of Section 5 hereof.

SECTION 2. This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of Government Code Section 65864 et seq., and pursuant to Chapter 4.04 of the Municipal Code of the City of Marina, which was added by City Ordinance No. 2003-04, establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of development agreements pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (the “Development Agreement Regulations”).

2 Ordinance No. 2022-
Page Three

SECTION 3. In accordance with Section 4.04.090 of the Development Agreement Regulations, the City Council hereby finds and determines, as follows:

(a) The Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the Specific Plan and the General Plan, as amended;
(b) The Amendment to the Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use districts in which the Property which is subject to the Development Agreement is located; (c) The Amendment to the Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice; (d) The Amendment to the Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
(e) The Amendment to the Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values; and (f) The Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5.
(g) Based on the information provided that no new environmental review for the project is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and that the Final EIR shall serve as the environmental review for the approval of the Amendment to the Development Agreement.

SECTION 4. The foregoing findings and determinations are based upon the following:

(a) The Recitals set forth in this Ordinance, which are deemed true and correct; (b) The Final EIR;
(c) The City’s General Plan;
(d) The Marina Zoning Map;
(e) All City staff reports (and all other public reports and documents) prepared for the Planning Commission, City Council, or others relating to the Final EIR, the Specific Plan, the General Plan Amendments, the Development Agreement, the Amendment and other actions relating to the Property;
(f) All documentary and oral evidence received at public hearing or submitted to the Planning Commission or City during the comment period relating to the Amendment; and
(g) All other matters of common knowledge to the City Council, including, but not limited to the City’s fiscal and financial status; City policies and regulations; reports, projections and correspondence related to development within and surrounding the City; State laws and regulations and publications.

3 Ordinance No. 2022-
Page Four

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Development Agreement, substantially in the form on file with the City Clerk subject further to such minor, conforming and clarifying changes consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Manager prior to execution thereof, including but not limited to completion of references and status of planning approvals, and completion and conformity of all exhibits thereto, as amended and as approved by the City Council.

SECTION 6. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance as provided in Section 9 hereof, the City Manager and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment to the Development Agreement on behalf of the City of Marina.

SECTION 7. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directe d to perform all acts authorized to be performed by the City Manager in the administration of the Amendment to the Development Agreement and the Development Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement as amended by the Amendment, including but not limited to provisions for certain administrative amendments and transfers and assignments as authorized therein.

SECTION 8 . If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or uncons titutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

SECTION 9. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption; as certified by the City Clerk.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was first read at a regular meeting of the Marina City Council on the 21 st day of June 2022, continued to July 19, 2022, continued to August 3, 2022 and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Marina City Council on the 16th day of August, 2022.

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 August 12, 2022 Item No. 11a

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council August 16, 2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 22-,

APPROVING A LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) attached as EXHIBIT A.

BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic High way Safety Plan (SH SP) that defines goals, objective s, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SH SP r equires collaboration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

The HSIP is a Federal -aid program that incorporates a data -driven, strategic appro ach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance . Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically targeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety.

A Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project impl ementation. Also, the plan should be viewed as a living document tha t can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities.

On May 4th, 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021 -37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley-Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement.

ANALYSIS:

A Local Road Safety Plan (“Plan”) is a road safety planning document that provides a holistic analysis of vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle crash data, and pro vides a roadmap for implementation of safety improvements. Beginning in 2022, it is required that a ll state, county, and local agencies adopt a Plan to be eligible to receive Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funds. These funds are used for p lanning documents, preliminary engineering documents, and construction improvements to mitigate saf ety-related issues at intersections and roadways.

1 In accordance with the draft Plan:

“[The] Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies emphasis areas to info rm and guide further safety evaluation of the City’s transportation network. The emphasis areas include the type of crash, certain locations, and notable relationships between current efforts and crash history. The LRSP analyzes crash data on an aggregate basis, as well as at specific locations to identify high -crash locations, high -risk locations, and city - wide trends and patterns.”

Conducted in conjunction with City staff, preparation of the Plan included outreach to various City stakeholders to identify areas of concern: City of Marina Police Department, the City of Marina Fire Department, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County. Stakeholders were asked to review the prelimin ary collision analysis and assist in identifying ten case study locations. Stakeholders also assisted in identifying potential safety improvement measures to mitigate the issues identified at the case study locations.

The draft Plan being presented for ad option memorializes the areas of concern, case study locations, potent ial funding sources, and estimated construction costs for grant funding applications. Intended to be a living document, the Plan is to be periodically updated as projects are constructed , thereby accomplishing projects in the Plan and allowing for identifi cation of new emphasis areas and safety improvements.

It is noted that the Plan is a planning tool. It is a roadmap for potential safety improvements at various locations in the City, t hough certain constraints may present difficulties or limit the City’s ability to implement them. As the various case studies allow for application of safety modifications to similar locations throughout the City, the City is not limited to the case study locations contained in the Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The development of th e plan is funded through a Caltrans Grant in the amount of $40,000 and $5,000 from the General Fund which have been allocated to project HSC2108.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommended that the City Council approve the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) . If approved, staff will submit the LRSP to Caltrans by September 9 th, 2022 in order to be eligible for grant funding to implement identified safety measures through future rounds of the HSIP.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Brian McMinn, P.E., P.L.S.

Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

APPROVING A LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic High way Safety Plan (SH SP) that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SH SP r equires collaboration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and;

WHEREAS, the HSI P is a Federal -aid program that incorporates a data -driven, str ategic approach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance . Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically targeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety, and;

WHEREAS, a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders t o identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project impl ementation. Also, the plan should be viewed as a living document that can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities, and;

WHEREAS, on May 4th, 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021 -37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley-Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement, and;

WHEREAS, A L ocal Road Safety Plan (“Plan”) is a road safety planning document that provides a holistic analysis of vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle crash data, and provides a roadmap for implementation of safety im provements. Beginning in 2022, it is required that all state, county, and local agencies adopt a Plan to be eligible to receive Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funds. These funds are used for planning documents, preliminary engineering docu ments, and construction improvements to mitigate safety -related issues at intersections and roadways., and;

WHEREAS, preparation of the Plan included outreach to various City stakeholders to identify areas of concern: City of Marina Police Department, the City of Marina Fire Department, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County. Stakeholders were asked to review the preliminary collision analysis and assist in identifying ten case study locations. Stakeholders also assisted in identifying potential safety improvement measures to mitigate the issues identified at the ca se study locations, and;

WHEREAS, The draft Plan being presented for adoption memorializes the areas of concern, case study locations, potential funding sources, and estimated constru ction costs for grant funding applications. Intended to be a living document, the Plan is to be periodically updated as projects are constructed, thereby accomplishing projects in the Plan and allowing for identification of new emphasis areas and safety improvements.

3 Resolution No. 2022-

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City C ouncil of the City of Marina does hereby approve the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) attached as Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Coun cil of the City of Marina, duly held on the 16th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 City of Marina LRSP July 2022

FINAL REPORT

FOR THE

CITY OF MARINA

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Prepared for:

City of Marina
Public Works Department
209 Cypress Avenue,
Marina, California 93933
Prepared by:
10 Almaden Boulevard, #1250
San Jose, California 95113
(669) 800-4130
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.  July 2022

EXHIBIT A
5 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The City of Marina employees and partners were instrumental in the development, review, and refinement of this Technical Memorandum. The City of Marina and Kimley-Horn would like to express their appreciation to the supporting staff and partners for their participation and contributions.

City of Marina Public Works
Brian McMinn
Edrie Delos Santos
Matt Jones
City of Marina Police Department
Eddie Anderson
Steven Russo
City of Marina Fire Department
Doug McCoun
Consultant Team
Frederik Venter
Darryl DePencier
Zachary Ramalingam
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Ariana Green
Janneke Stause
City of Marina Planning Services
Guido Persicone
City of Marina Building Division
Dan Paolini

STATUTORY NOTICE
23 U.S.C. § 409: US Code - Section 409: Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway- highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data. 6 City of Marina LRSP July 2022

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.  INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1.  Document Organization ................................................................................................ 2

2.  VISION, GOAL, AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................. 3

3.  PROCESS ................................................................................................................................ 4

3.1.  Guiding Manuals ........................................................................................................... 5

3.1.1.  Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners .............. 5

3.1.2.  Highway Safety Manual ...................................................................................... 6

3.2.  Analysis Techniques ..................................................................................................... 6

3.2.1.  Crash and Network Screening Analysis ............................................................. 6

3.2.2.  Critical Crash Rate (CCR) Analysis .................................................................... 7

3.2.3.  Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion ............... 8

3.2.4.  Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) ........................................................ 8

4.  STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 10

4.1.  Stakeholder Meetings ................................................................................................. 10

5.  REVIEW OF CITY PLANNING DOCUMENTS ............................................................................... 11

6.  DATA SOURCES .................................................................................................................... 12

6.1.  Roadway Network ....................................................................................................... 12

6.2.  Intersections ............................................................................................................... 12

6.3.  Crashes ...................................................................................................................... 12

7.  SAFETY TRENDS ................................................................................................................... 13

7.1.  City of Marina Fatal and Severe Injury (K+SI) Crashes Compared to Statewide Fatal and Severe Injury (K+SI) Crashes ....................................................................................... 13

7.2.  Severity Level ............................................................................................................. 15

7.3.  Cause of Crash ........................................................................................................... 20

7.4.  Highest Occurring Crash Types .................................................................................. 21

7.5.  Lane Departure ........................................................................................................... 21

7.6.  Aggressive, Impaired and Distracted Driving .............................................................. 22

7.6.1.  Aggressive Driving ............................................................................................ 22

7.6.2.  Impaired Driving ............................................................................................... 22

7.6.3.  Distracted Driving ............................................................................................. 22

7.7.  Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes ................................................................................. 23

7.7.1.  Bicycle Crashes ................................................................................................ 23

7.7.2.  Pedestrian Crashes .......................................................................................... 23

8.  RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 26

8.1.  Engineering Countermeasures ................................................................................... 26

8.1.1.  Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) .................................................................. 26

8.1.2.  Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox ........................................................... 27

8.1.3.  Project Sheets for Priority Locations ................................................................ 31

9.  EMPHASIS AREAS ................................................................................................................. 34

9.1.  Emphasis Area 1: Reduce Aggressive Driving Behavior ............................................ 34

9.2.  Emphasis Area 2: Improve Visibility and Lighting ....................................................... 35 7 City of Marina LRSP July 2022

iii

9.3.  Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures ......................................................................... 36

10.  EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 37

10.1. Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 37

10.2. Implementation ........................................................................................................... 37

10.2.1. Near- and Mid-Term Focus Areas .................................................................... 37

10.3. Updates to the LRSP .................................................................................................. 38

10.3.1. HSIP Analyzer .................................................................................................. 39

10.3.2. HSIP Eligibility .................................................................................................. 39

10.4. Funding ....................................................................................................................... 39

10.4.1. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ................................................ 40

10.4.2. Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) ................................................ 40

10.4.3. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) ......................................... 40

10.4.4. California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) .......................................................................... 41

10.4.5. California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grants ............................................... 41

10.4.6. SACOG Regional Funding Programs ............................................................... 41

10.4.7. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) ............................................................. 42

11.  NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................................................... 43

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Literature Review
Appendix B Intersection Network Screening Results
Appendix C Segment Network Screening Results
Appendix D Project Sheets

8 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
iv

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Crash Severity by Year .............................................................................................. 15 Figure 2 —Map of Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes ................................................................... 17 Figure 3 —Crashes per Intersection ........................................................................................... 18 Figure 4 —Crashes per Roadway Segment ............................................................................... 19 Figure 5 – Crashes by Cause ..................................................................................................... 20 Figure 6 – Crashes by Type ........................................................................................................ 21 Figure 7 – Bicycle-Involved Crash Locations .............................................................................. 24 Figure 8 – Pedestrian-Involved Crash Locations ........................................................................ 25 Figure 9 – CMF Calculation ........................................................................................................ 26 Figure 10 – CMF Method Sample Calculation ............................................................................ 26 Figure 11 – CRF Calculation ....................................................................................................... 27

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – City Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Compared to Statewide .................................. 13 Table 2 – Marina OTS Rankings (2019) ..................................................................................... 14 Table 3 – Crashes by Severity .................................................................................................... 16 Table 4 – Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes .................................................................. 22 Table 5 – Action of Pedestrian in Collision ................................................................................. 23 Table 6 – City of Marina Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox .............................................. 28 Table 7 – Historical HSIP Cycle Information ............................................................................... 31 Table 8 – Priority Location Summary .......................................................................................... 33 Table 9 – Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures Toolbox ............................................................ 36 9 City of Marina LRSP July 2022

v

LIST OF ACRONYMS
A Severe Injury Crash
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ARIDE Advance Roadside Impaired Enforcement
ATP Active Transportation Program
B Non-incapacitating Injury Crash
BCR Benefit/Cost Ratio
C Possible Injury Crash
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CCR Critical Crash Rate
CMF Crash Modification Factor
CRF Crash Reduction Factor
CTC California Transportation Commission
DEV Daily Entering Volume
DRE Drug Recognition Expert
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
GIS Geographic Information System
HFST High Friction Surface Treatment
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
IIP Interregional Improvement Program
ITIP Interregional Transportation Improvement Program
K Fatal Crash
K+SI Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
LPI Leading Pedestrian Interval
LRSM Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners (Version

1.5, April 2020)
LRSP Local Road Safety Plan
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
O No Injury Crash (Property Damage Only)
OTS Office of Traffic Safety
10 City of Marina LRSP July 2022

vi
PDO Property Damage Only
RRFB Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
R/W Right-of-Way
SACOG Sacramento Area Council of Governments
SB1 California Senate Bill 1
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

11 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
1 1. I NTRODUCTION
The City of Marina is situated on California’s central coast in Monterey County. Marina covers approximately 9 square miles and has a population of greater than 22,000. The City experiences high volumes of commuter traffic as drivers use the city’s arterials as a cut-through between Salinas and Monterey. Highway 1 runs along the Western edge of the City and the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trail passes through the City as well, running from Pacific Grove to Castroville. The City’s transportation network includes more than 80 centerline miles of City-maintained roads and 630 intersections, 19 of which are signalized and 11 of which are roundabouts.

This Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies emphasis areas to inform and guide further safety evaluation of the City’s transportation network. The emphasis areas include different crash types, certain locations, and notable relationships between current efforts and crash history. The LRSP analyzes crash data on an aggregate basis, as well as at specific locations to identify Citywide safety trends, high-crash locations, high-risk locations, and locations with unusual crash patterns or high-crash severities. The analysis of crash history throughout the City’s transportation network allows for opportunities to:
 Identify safety factors in the transportation network that may be challenging for various roadway users
 Improve safety at specific high-crash and high-risk locations  Develop safety measures aligning with the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Five Es of safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, to encourage safer driver behavior and reduce fatalities and severe injuries
The process and analysis performed in development of the City’s LRSP, including establishing the initial vision and goals for the LRSP, performing crash history analysis, identification of emphasis areas and recommended engineering and non-engineering safety countermeasures are summarized in this LRSP. The information compiled provide a foundation for decision making and prioritization for safety countermeasures and projects that enhance safety for all modes of travel within the City.

The City has taken steps to enhance multi-modal safety throughout the City and through this LRSP is continuing to make safety a priority in its planning processes. The City builds upon the safety practices that have led to prioritizing traffic safety across its road network in this LRSP by identifying areas of emphasis and systemic recommendations that can be implemented to further enhance safety. This LRSP analyzes the most recent range of crash data that was available at the start of the project (January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2019) and roadway improvements to assess historic trends, crash patterns, and areas of increasing concern.

The intent of the LRSP is to:
 Create a greater awareness of road safety and risks
 Reduce the number of fatal and severe-injury crashes
 Develop lasting partnerships through collaboration among professionals in various disciplines
 Support for grant/funding applications
 Assist in prioritizing investments in traffic safety
12 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
2 1.1. Document Organization
The LRSP is organized into the following sections:

Section 1 Provides an introduction to the LRSP.

Section 2 Presents the vision, goal, and objectives for the LRSP.

Section 3 Summarizes the LRSP development process including guidance documents and analysis techniques.

Section 4 Presents the project stakeholders and stakeholder engagement.

Section 5 Summarizes the review of City planning documents.

Section 6 Contains the LRSP data sources.

Section 7 Provides a summary of safety trends.

Section 8 Includes recommended engineering and non-infrastructure countermeasures.

Section 9 Emphasis Areas
Section 10 Summarizes the evaluation and implementation of the safety countermeasures.

Section 11 Identifies next steps.

Appendices

13 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
3 2. V ISION, GOAL, AND OBJECTIVES
This LRSP evaluates the transportation network as well as non-infrastructure programs and policies within the City. Mitigation measures are evaluated using criteria to analyze the safety of road users (drivers and passengers, bicyclists, and pedestrians), the interaction of travel modes, and the potential benefits of safety countermeasures. This effort is intended to use historical data to identify trends and develop a toolbox of countermeasures applicable to conditions in the City that can be used for proactive identification and implementation of opportunities, without relying solely on a reaction and response to crashes as they occur.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) maintains a list of Proven Safety Countermeasures. The list currently contains twenty (20) Proven Safety Countermeasures, one of which is the development of a LRSP. Implementation of LRSPs has improved safety in local jurisdictions across the country by providing a guide for local jurisdictions to systemically address the conditions that are known to contribute to fatal and severe-injury crashes. LRSPs provide a locally developed and customized “roadmap” to directly address the jurisdictions’ most common safety challenges.

Following discussions with City staff and a review of existing plans and policies for the area, the following Vision, Goal, and Objectives were established for this LRSP:

Vision:

Support the California vision of moving towards significantly reducing fatalities and severe injuries for all road users
Goal:

Identify transportation safety initiatives (projects and programs) and partnerships under the 5 Es of traffic safety including Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies, to continue reducing fatalities and severe injuries in the City of Marina.

Objectives:
 Identify major contributing factors to crashes and define priority locations for roadway safety improvements including pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular modes of travel
 Identify cost-effective countermeasures and safety investments that can be applied systemically (i.e., install curve advance warning signs, edge-lines, rumble strips, etc.)
 Promote safe, equitable, and multimodal mobility opportunities  Create an LRSP document to capitalize on established safety initiatives and identify other strategies to prioritize safety investments  Document the City of Marina’s procedures for on-going crash data monitoring
14 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
4 3. P ROCESS
One of the primary objectives of the City of Marina and its stakeholders is to provide safe, sustainable, and efficient mobility choices for their residents and visitors. The City will continue its collaboration with stakeholders to identify and discuss safety issues within the community through the development of the LRSP and its implementation.

Guidance on the LRSP process is provided at both the national (FHWA) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) level. Both agencies have developed a general framework of data and recommendations to be included in a LRSP.

The FHWA encourages:
 The establishment of a working group (Stakeholders) to participate in developing an LRSP.
 Review crash, traffic, and roadway data to identify areas of concern.  Establish goals, priorities, and countermeasures to recommend improvements at spot locations, systemically, and comprehensively.

Caltrans’ guidance follows a similar outline with the following steps:
 Establish leadership
 Analyze the safety data
 Determine emphasis areas
 Identify strategies
 Prioritize and incorporate strategies
 Evaluate and update the LRSP
This LRSP documents the results of data and information obtained, including the vision, goal, and objectives for the LRSP; existing safety efforts; collision analysis; emphasis areas; and project sheets for priority locations. Furthermore, the development of the LRSP recommendations considers the “Five Es” of traffic safety defined by the California SHSP:

Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies throughout its process.
15 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
5 3.1. Guiding Manuals
The following section describes the analysis process undertaken to evaluate safety within the City at a systemic level. Using a network screening process, locations within the City that will most likely benefit from safety enhancements were identified. Using historic crash data, crash risk factors for the entire network are derived. The outcomes inform the identification and prioritization of engineering and non-infrastructure safety countermeasures that address certain roadway characteristics and related behaviors that contribute to motor vehicle crashes as well as crashes involving active transportation users.

This process uses the latest National and State best practices for statistical roadway analysis described in the following sections.

3.1.1. Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners The Local Roadway Safety: A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners (Version 1.5, April 2020) (LRSM) purpose is to encourage local agencies to pursue a proactive approach to identifying and analyzing safety issues, while preparing to compete for project funding opportunities. A proactive approach is defined as analyzing the safety of the entire roadway network through either a one-time, network wide analysis, or by routine analyses of the roadway network.

According to the LRSM, “The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) – Division of Local Assistance is responsible for administering California’s federal safety funding intended for local safety improvements.”
To provide the most benefit and to be competitive for grant funding, the analysis leading to countermeasure selection should focus on both intersections and roadway segments and be considerate of roadway characteristics and traffic volumes. The result should be a list of locations that are most likely to benefit from cost-effective countermeasures, preferably prioritized by benefit/cost ratio (BCR). The LRSM suggests using a mixture of quantitative and qualitative measures to identify and rank locations that considers both crash frequency and crash rates. These findings should then be screened for patterns such as crash types and severity to aid in the determination of issues causing higher numbers of crashes and the potential countermeasures that could be most effective. Qualitative analysis should include field visits and a review of existing roadway characteristics and traffic control devices. The specific roadway context can then be used to assess what conditions may increase safety risk at the site and systematic level.

Countermeasure selection should be supported using Crash Modification Factors (CMFs).

These factors are the peer reviewed product of before and after research that quantifies the expected rate of crash reduction that can be expected from implementation of a given countermeasure. If more than one countermeasure is under consideration, the LRSM provides guidance on how to apply CMFs appropriately.
16 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
6 3.1.2. Highway Safety Manual
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual (HSM), published in 2010, presents a variety of methods for quantitatively estimating crash frequency or severity at a variety of locations. This four- part manual is divided into Parts: A) Introduction, Human Factors, and Fundamentals, B) Roadway Safety Management Process, C) Predictive Method, D) Crash Modification Factors.

Chapter 4 of Part B of the HSM discusses the Network Screening process. The Network Screening Process is a tool for an agency to analyze their entire network and identify/rank locations that, based on the implementation of a countermeasure, are most likely to least likely realize a reduction in the frequency of crashes.

The HSM identifies five steps in this process:

1. Establish Focus: Identify the purpose or intended outcome of the network screening analysis. This decision will influence data needs, the selection of performance measures and the screening method that can be applied.

2. Identify Network and Establish Reference Populations: Specify the types of sites or facilities being screened (i.e., segments, intersections, geometrics) and identify groupings of similar sites or facilities.

3. Select Performance Measures: There are a variety of performance measures available to evaluate the potential to reduce crash frequency at a site. In this step, the performance measure is selected as a function of the screening focus and the data and analytical tools available.

4. Select Screening Method: There are three principal screening methods described in this chapter (i.e., ranking, sliding window, peak searching). Each method has advantages and disadvantages; the most appropriate method for a given situation should be selected.

5. Screen and Evaluate Results: The final step in the process is to conduct the screening and analysis and evaluate the results.

The HSM provides several statistical methods for screening roadway networks to identify high risk locations based on overall crash histories. In addition to identifying the total number of crashes, this LRSP uses a method referred to as Critical Crash Rate (CCR) to analyze the data.

3.2. Analysis Techniques

3.2.1. Crash and Network Screening Analysis
Intersections and roadways were analyzed using four crash metrics:
 Number of Crashes
 CCR (HSM Ch. 4)
 Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion (HSM Ch. 4)  Equivalent Property Damage Only (HSM Ch. 4)
17 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
7 The initial steps of the crash analysis established sub-populations of roadway segments and intersections that have similar characteristics. For this LRSP, intersections were grouped by their control type (Unsignalized) and segments by their roadway category (Arterial, Collector, Minor Collector, and Local). Individual crash rates were calculated for each sub-population. The population level crash rates were then used to assess whether a specific location has more or fewer crashes than expected. These sub-populations were also used to determine typical crash patterns to help identify locations where unusual numbers of specific crash types are occurring.

The network screening process ranks intersections and roadway segments by the number of crashes that occurred at each one over the analysis period, and then identifies areas that had more of a given type of crash than would be expected for that type of location. These crash type factors were:
 Crash severity - fatal, severe injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain, and property damage only (PDO)
 Crash type
- broadside, rear-end, sideswipe, he
ad-on, hit object, overturned, bicycle,
pedestrian, and other
 Environmental factors – lighting and wet roads
 Driver behavior - impaired, aggressive, and distracted driving From the results of the network screening analyses, a short-list of locations was chosen based on crash activity, CCR, crash severity, crash patterns, location type, and area within the City to provide the greatest variety of locations covering the widest range of safety opportunities for toolbox development. The intent is to populate the safety toolbox with mitigation measures that will be applicable to most of the crash activity in the City.

3.2.2. Critical Crash Rate (CCR) Analysis
Reviewing the number of crashes at a location is a good way to understand the cost to society incurred at the local level, but does not provide a complete indication of the level of risk for those who use that intersection or roadway segment on a daily basis. The HSM describes the CCR method, which provides a statistical review of locations to determine where risk is higher than that experienced by other similar locations. It is also the first step in analyzing for patterns that may suggest systemic issues that can be addressed at that location, and proactively at others to prevent new safety challenges from emerging.

The CCR analysis compares the observed crash rate to the expected crash rate at a particular location based on facility type and traffic volume using a locally calculated average crash rate for the specific type of intersection or roadway segment being analyzed. Based on traffic volumes and a weighted Citywide crash rate for each facility type, a critical crash rate threshold is established at the 95-percent confidence level to determine locations with higher crash rates that are unlikely to be random. The threshold is calculated for each location individually based on its traffic volume and the crash profile of similar facilities. A CCR value of greater than zero reflects a location that has a higher crash rate than facilities with similar volumes, while a negative CCR value signifies a below-average crash rate. It should be noted that the CCR does not reflect the severity of the crashes occurring at the location, but rather the number of crashes for the given volume.
18 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
8 Critical Crash Rate Formula
𝑅௖,௜ൌ𝑅௔൅൤𝑃ൈ ට
ோೌ
ொ௏೔
൨൅൤
ଵ
൫ଶൈሺொ௏೔ሻ൯൨
Where,
Rc,i = Critical crash rate for intersection i
Ra = Weighted average crash rate for reference population P = P-value for corresponding confidence level
MEVi = Million entering vehicles for intersection i
Source: Highway Safety Manual
Data Needs
CCR is calculated using:
 Daily Entering Volume (DEV) for intersections, or Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for roadway segments
 Intersection control types to separate them into like populations  Roadway functional classification to separate them into like populations  Crash records in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) or tabular form including coordinates or linear measures
Strengths
 Reduces low volume exaggeration
 Considers variance
 Establishes comparison threshold
Weaknesses
 Does not account for regression to the mean bias

3.2.3. Probability of Specific Crash Types Exceeding Threshold Proportion When analyzing crash data systematically, it is important to identify areas where certain types of crashes are occurring with greater frequency. The HSM describes a method of identifying locations where probability of a specific crash type exceeds the threshold population. This method prioritizes locations based on the probability that the true proportion (long-term predicted proportion) of a type of crash or injury level will exceed the threshold proportion. The threshold proportion is based on the proportion of a specific crash type/severity to all crashes within the dataset (HSM, Chapter 4). This analysis identifies locations where certain crash types are over-represented to be isolated for further analysis.

3.2.4. Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO)
The EPDO method is described in the HSM. This method assigns weighting factors to crashes based on injury level (severe, injury, property damage only) to develop a property damage only 19 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
9 score. In this analysis, the injury crash costs were calculated for each location (based on the latest Caltrans injury costs). This value is then divided by the injury cost for a property damage only crash. The resulting number is the equivalent number of property damage only crashes at each site. This value allows all locations to be compared based on injury crash costs (HSM, Chapter 4).

EPDO Formula:

𝐸𝑃𝐷𝑂 ൌ
ሺ𝑁ி൅𝑁ௌሻ∗ 1,590,000 ൅ሺ𝑁ை∗ 142,300ሻ൅ሺ𝑁஼∗ 80,900ሻ ൅ሺ𝑁௉஽ை∗ 13,300ሻ 13,300
Where,
EPDO = Equivalent Pro
perty Damage Only (in units of crashes)
NF = Number of fatal crashes
NS = Number of severe injury crashes
NO = Number of other visible injury crashes
NC = Number of complaint of pain crashes
NPDO = Number of PDO crashes
The cost to society for each crash type along unsignalized intersections is as follows:
 Fatal: $1,590,000
 Severe: $1,590,000
 Other Visible Injury: $142,300
 Complaint of Pain: $80,900
 PDO: $13,300
Source: Highway Safety Manual, Local Roadway Safety Manual (2020) To give an ex
ample from Appendix D, the intersection of 2nd Ave and Imjin Parkway experienced 79 crashes from 2015-2019. The crashes are broken down by severity as follows:
0 fatal crashes, 0 crashes resulting in severe injuries, 3 crashes resulting in other visible injuries, 8 crashes resulting in complaints of pain, and 68 PDO crashes.

𝐸𝑃𝐷𝑂 ൌ
ሺ0 ൅0ሻ∗ 1,590,000 ൅ሺ3 ∗ 142,300ሻ൅ሺ8 ∗ 80,900ሻ ൅ሺ68 ∗ 13,300ሻ 13,300
ൌ149
The 79 crashes of ranging severity that took place at the intersection of 2nd Ave and Imjin Parkway comprise the monetary equivalent of 149 PDO crashes. This intersection has a CCR value of 0.79. Together the EPDO and CCR values show that the intersection of 2nd Ave and Imjin Parkway has historically had a relative crash rate that is higher than average for similar facilities, and that
that the crashes that have occurred there have generally resulted in injuries that are not fatal or severe.
20 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
10 4. S TAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
As part of the LRSP, local stakeholders were included in the process to ensure local perspective was kept at the forefront of this planning effort. A stakeholder group comprised of City staff and external stakeholders was formed. This group consisted of members of the City’s Public Works, Planning Services, Building Division, and representatives from the City’s Police and Fire departments, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County.

The stakeholders were called together to offer insight on the safety concerns present in the City’s transportation network. After the initial network screening and safety analysis, the stakeholder group met in the field to observe ten “priority” locations and to discuss potential countermeasures. The summary of the stakeholder meetings is provided below.

4.1. Stakeholder Meetings
A project stakeholder workshop was conducted virtually on May 3, 2021. At the meeting, the LRSP stakeholder group was introduced to the project and provided an overview of the data used, data analysis approach, preliminary results and priority/emphasis areas. In addition to the LRSP overview, stakeholders were asked to provide local insight and knowledge for several “priority” locations that were identified after the initial network screening and crash analysis process. A virtual field review was also performed in this meeting to give an overview of 10 potential case study locations. This meeting provided an opportunity to perform a field assessment and offer another opportunity to solicit feedback from members of the multidisciplinary stakeholder group.

Potential safety countermeasures for each location were recommended and discussed at the field review meeting.
21 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
11 5. R EVIEW OF CITY PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Existing plans, policies, and projects that were recently completed, planned, or are on-going within the City were compiled at the start of the LRSP process to gain perspective on the existing efforts for transportation-related improvements within the City. High-level key points regarding transportation improvements and safety-related topics were identified to inform decision making in this LRSP.

The following planning documents were reviewed to obtain planned and programmed projects:
 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
 City of Marina Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan
 Seaside and Marina Safe Walking and Biking to School: Complete Streets Plan  City of Marina General Plan
A matrix identifying plans and improvements is included in Appendix A. The intent of this matrix is to provide an idea of the types of strategies in place or encouraged by the City and to reveal projects that may impact the safety analysis process.
22 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
12 6. D ATA SOURCES
The following data was obtained from the City for use in crash data analysis.

6.1. Roadway Network
The collision analysis, which is described in detail in Section 3, used California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans’) roadway classification system. The roadway network classification was assigned to each corridor roadway segment as either a major arterial, minor arterial, collector, or local road to develop crash rates specific to the functional design and capacity.

Comparative statistics were stratified by roadway classification (i.e., only major arterials are compared to major arterials).

6.2. Intersections
The crash analysis also required each intersection within the City to be classified by control type. Intersections throughout the City were classified as signalized, unsignalized or roundabouts.

6.3. Crashes
Crash data for the five-year period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 20191 was used for the crash analysis. Using data for the past five-year period is sufficient to identify potential trends in crashes by location and type, while not being outdated as to have data that would include long-term technology and cultural changes. The crash data comes from Crossroads, which contains crash records from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. This database contains law enforcement records and provide GPS coordinate data that can be used to geocode crashes into a Geographic Information System (GIS) format.

The Crossroads crash data required preliminary cleaning and scrubbing to make it compatible with the GIS network screening tool. In total, there were 1,500 crash records in the Crossroads database from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Of these crashes, 1,334 crash records contained GPS data and were used in the statistical analysis. 1 The majority of 2020 traffic volumes and patterns are acknowledged to have been influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, this data (all of 2020) was intentionally excluded from this assessment. 23 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 13

7. S AFETY TRENDS
The following sections contain the results of the analysis process which included evaluation of fatal and severe injury (K+SI) crashes to statewide K+SI crashes, among other evaluations including crash by severity level, cause, pedestrian, and bicycle crashes. Summary tables presenting the crash data analysis and network screening results for all intersections and roadway segments are provided in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.

7.1. City of Marina Fatal and Severe Injury (K+SI) Crashes Compared to Statewide
The California SHSP focuses on 16 challenge areas identified by the SHSP Executive Leadership and Steering Committees after an in-depth analysis of California K+SI crash data as well as an extensive statewide outreach process that involved hundreds of diverse traffic stakeholders around the state. Crashes can be attributed to 14 of the 16 challenge areas. Table 1 contains a comparison of the City’s K+SI crashes to the statewide K+SI crashes. Challenge areas where the City percentages were higher than the statewide percentages are noted in Table 1. The definitions for emphasis area are included in Appendix A.

Table 1 – City Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Compared to Statewide Challenge Areas
Statewide  Marina
F+SI Collisions
(2009‐2018)*
% of F+SI
Collisions
(2009‐2018)
F+SI Colllisions
(2009‐2018)  %  % Point
Difference
Total  133,737  ‐  92  - ‐
Bicyclists  11,088  8.3%  15  16.3%  8.0%
Pedestrians  25,713  19.2%  25  27.2%  7.9%
Aging Drivers  16,525  12.4%  16  17.4%  5.0%
Aggressive Driving  44,253  33.1%  31  33.7%  0.6%
Work Zones  1,919  1.4%  0  0.0%  ‐1.4%
Distracted Driving  6,712  5.0%  3  3.3%  ‐1.8%
Intersections  31,587  23.6%  20  21.7%  ‐1.9%
Commercial Vehicles  8,523  6.4%  4  4.3%  ‐2.0%
Young Drivers  17,507  13.1%  6  6.5%  ‐6.6%
Motorcyclists  28,062  21.0%  12  13.0%  ‐7.9%
Occupant Protection  19,016  14.2%  5  5.4%  ‐8.8%
Impaired Driving  33,795  25.3%  15  16.3%  ‐9.0%
Lane Departure  57,850  43.3%  24  26.1%  ‐17.2%
Driver Licensing**  7,428  24.7%  1  50.0%  25.3%**
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019).

Notes:

1. Percentages will not add up to 100%, as a fatality or severe injury could have involved multiple Challenge Areas (i.e., a young driver that was impaired and unrestrained)

2. California SHSP does not have reported crash data for the following two challenge areas: Emergency Response and Emerging Technology
**There is not sufficient data for crashes related to Driver Licensing to draw an accurate comparison to statewide crash data 24 City of Marina LRSP 14

7.2. California Office of Tra ffic Safety (OTS) Rankings The California Office of Traffic Safety ranks cities of similar populations based on crash statistics. As seen in Table 2 below, the City of Marina was compared with 103 other cities with similar populations. The higher the OTS ranking out of 103, the lower the crash rate is for the given
emphasis area. For example, Marina was ranked very low for crashes related to underage drinking and
driving (101/103). However, Marina was ranked the second worst in its bracket for crashes involving bicyclists under 15 years old (2/103).

Table 2 – Marina OTS Rankings (2019)
Agency  Year  Population (Avg)  DVMT
Marina  2019  22,372  295,330
TYPE OF CRASH  VICTIMS KILLED & INJURED  OTS RANKING
Total Fatal and Injury  58  64/103
Alcohol Involved  14  29/103
Had Been Drinking Driver < 21  0  ‐/103
Had Been Drinking Driver 21 – 34  2  ‐/103
Motorcycles  1  ‐/103
Pedestrians  8  40/103
Pedestrians < 15  2  ‐/103
Pedestrians 65+  1  ‐/103
Bicyclists  4  64/103
Bicyclists < 15  3  2/103
Composite  45  47/103
TYPE OF CRASH  FATAL & INJURY CRASHES  OTS RANKING
Speed Related  14  40/103
Nighttime (9:00pm – 2:59am)  9  39/103
Hit and Run  6  36/103
TYPE OF ARRESTS  ARRESTS  OTS RANKING*
DUI Arrests  48  46/103
July 2022
25 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 15

7.3. Severity Level
Knowing the outcomes of the crash (the injuries or type of damage which occurred) is a key part of assessing the environment and safety factors around the site of the crash. From 2015 to 2019, there were a total of 2 fatal crashes and 11 crashes resulting in severe injuries, as shown in Figure 1.

The National Safety Council developed the “KABCO” injury scale, which is frequently used by law enforcement for classifying injuries:
 K – Fatal
 A – Severe injury
 B – Other Visible Injury
 C – Complaint of Pain
 O – No injury (Property Damage Only)
Figure 1 – Crash Severity by Year
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019); processed by Crossroads. 0 50
100
150
200
250
PDO Complaint Other  Visible Severe Fatal
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
26 City of Marina LRSP 16
Table 3 below summarizes the crashes by severity for signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections and roadway segments. Of the three control types, unsignalized intersections had the most crashes (43%), followed by signalized intersections (37%) and roadway segments (20%). More fatal and severe crashes occurred at unsignalized intersections than at the other control types.

Table 3 – Crashes by Severity
Signalized
Intersection
Unsignalized
Intersection Roadway Segment Total
Crashes % Crashes % Crashes % Crashes %
Fatal 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 0.1%
Severe Injury 4 29% 7 64% 0 0% 11 1%
Other visible Injury 27 38% 30 44% 11 16% 68 5%
Complaint of Pain 66 40% 55 35% 36 26% 157 11%
Property Damage
Only 390 33% 486 44% 220 20% 1096 83%
Total 487 37% 579 43% 268 20% 1334 100%
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019); processed by Crossroads.

July 2022
27 City of Marina LRSP July 202217
Figure 2 —Map of Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
*Note: there were no roadway segments with severe injuries 28 City of Marina LRSP 18
Figure 3 —Crashes per Intersection
202 July 2
29 City of Marina LRSP 19
Figure 4 —Crashes per Roadway Segment
202 July 2
30 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 20

7.4. Cause of Crash
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) crash attribute of the Crossroads dataset, as identified by the responding officer, was analyzed to obtain a primary collision factor (PCF) associated with the crash. This was completed to pinpoint a specific cause for each crash based on the violation. The CVC codes were compiled and assigned a PCF depending on the conditions of the violation. The PCFs were then broken into several categories based on the ‘PRIMARY_COLL_FACTOR’ attribute values from Crossroads.

Figure 5 summarizes the contributing cause of collisions reported by the responding officer. In the City of Marina from 2015-2019, 31% of crashes are related to unsafe speeds. This is followed by improper turning (18%), Auto R/W Violations (10%), driving under the influence (7%), unknown causes (7%), and unsafe starting or backing (6%). The remaining causes make up approximately 21% of all collisions within the City of Marina.

Figure 5 – Crashes by Cause
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019); processed by Crossroads. 1%:

Lights, Brakes, Impeding
Traffic, Other Equipment,
Hazardous Parking,
Pedestrian Violation
Unsafe Speed
31%
Improper Turning
18%
Auto R/W Violation
10%
Unknown
7%
Driving Under Influence
7%
Unsafe Starting or
Backing
6%
Other Improper Driving
5%
Traffic Signals and Signs
3%
Unsafe Lane Change
2%
Following Too Closely
2%
Other Than Driver or Ped
2%
Improper Passing
1%
Wrong Side of Road
1%
Ped R/W Violation
1% Other Hazardous
Movement
1%
Other
1%
31 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 21

7.5. Highest Occurring Crash Types
According to reported data, approximately 1,500 collisions occurred within the public roadways of the city during the five-year study period. Of these 1,500 collisions, 1,334 had sufficient spatial information to assign to intersections and roadway segments. Figure 6 indicates that Rear-End (~38%), Sideswipe (~21%) and Broadside (~18%) collisions are consistently the most
common collision types within the City of Marina.

Figure 6 – Crashes by Type
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019); processed by Crossroads.

7.6. Lane Departure
Caltrans defines crashes involving lane departure as those with crash types listed as ‘Head-On’, ‘Hit Object’, or ‘Overturned’. This also includes instances where a vehicle runs off the road or crosses into the opposing lane prior to the crash. There were 192 lane departure crashes over the study period within the City. Of the 894 lane departure crashes, 1 was fatal, 2 resulted in severe injuries, 15 with other visible injuries, 15 with complaints of pain, and 190 with no injuries (PDO).
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Other
Overturned
Hit Object
Head On
Rear End
Sideswipe
Broadside
Bicycle
Pedestrian
32 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 22

7.7. Aggressive, Impaired and Distracted Driving
Table 4 below presents the number of crashes per year related to aggressive, impaired, and distracted driving.

Table 4 – Aggressive and Impaired Driving Crashes
Year Aggressive
Driving
Impaired
Driving
Distracted
Driving Total
2015 88  31  1  120
2016 122  30  1  153
2017 137  40  0  177
2018 104  42  1  147
2019 106  43  2  151
Total 557  186  5  748
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (2015 – 2019); processed by Crossroads.

7.7.1. Aggressive Driving
The Caltrans 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) defined aggressive driving as driving behaviors that include speeding, tailgating, and other reckless maneuvers (as identified by the on-scene officer). Of the 557 aggressive driving collisions, 0 resulted in fatalities, 4 resulted in severe injury, 26 with visible injury, and 85 with complaint of pain by the involved parties and 442 with property damage only.

7.7.2. Impaired Driving
Collisions involving drugs or alcohol include all collisions where there was any evidence of drug or alcohol use by the driver. This is different from impaired driving statistics in that drivers do not need to exceed the legally defined threshold of intoxication to be counted. The 2020-2024 SHSP considers any level of alcohol consumption to have the potential to impact driver responsiveness and decision making. The City of Marina reported 186 impaired driving collisions from 2015-2019. Of the 186 impaired driving collisions, 1 resulted in a fatality, 2 with serious injuries, 16 with other visible injuries and 18 with complaints of pain. The remaining 149 collisions were property damage only

7.7.3. Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is another newer challenge area that identifies collisions where the driver responsible for the collision was engaging in another activity that took their attention away from driving, thus increasing the chance of a crash. The SWITRS database includes an attribute for inattention as a factor in crashes. It also has a field for cell phone use. Only 5 distracted driving crashes were reported from 2015-2019, indicating issues related to under-reporting. More consistent reporting would give a better indication of the trends related to distracted driving. .
33 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 23

7.8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes

7.8.1. Bicycle Crashes
There were 22 bicycle-involved collisions over the study period between 2015-2019, making up

1.4% of all collisions in the city. Of the 22 bicycle-involved collisions, 1 was reported with a severe injury, 9 were reported with other visible injuries and 9 with complaints of pain. The remaining 3 collisions resulted in property damage only. These bicycle collision locations are visually represented in Figure 7.

7.8.2. Pedestrian Crashes
Over the five-year period between 2015-2019, 44 pedestrian-involved collisions occurred, making up nearly 3% of all collisions within the city. Of the 44 collisions, 5 collisions with severe injuries, 14 collisions with other visible injuries, and 17 collisions with complaints of pain. The remaining crashes were reported with property damage only. These pedestrian collision locations are visually represented in Figure 8.

Table 5 displays the locations of these collisions and Table 9 identifies what action the pedestrian was taking at the time of collision. Most pedestrians were identified as crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection.

Table 5 – Action of Pedestrian in Collision
Pedestrian Action
Crossing In
Crosswalk At
Intersection
Crossing Not
In Crosswalk In Road Not In Road Total
Number of Crashes  18  10  3  13  44
34 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 24
Figure 7 – Bicycle-Involved Crash Locations
Note: There were no intersections with exactly 2 or 3 bicycle crashes 35 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 25
Figure 8 – Pedestrian-Involved Crash Locations
36 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 26

8. R ECOMMENDATIONS
The following sections provide more information on potential engineering and non-infrastructure safety countermeasures that are likely to address conditions that were observed to contribute to crash activity in the City.

8.1. Engineering Countermeasures
While there are many safety countermeasures that could be used to systemically improve roadway safety, the following sections provide countermeasures for consideration by the City.

The following sections contain a description of Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs) associated with the engineering countermeasures toolbox.

8.1.1. Crash Modification Factors (CMFs)
When identifying potential systemic safety improvements, it is important to look at CMFs for the proposed improvements. The CMF Method is found in Part D of the HSM. CMFs are defined as the ratio of effectiveness of one condition in comparison to another condition and represent the relative change in crash frequency due to a change in one specific condition. In other words, a CMF is a multiplicative factor used to compute the expected number of crashes after implementing a given countermeasure at a specific site. Countermeasures with CMFs less than one are expected to reduce crashes if applied, while those countermeasures with CMFs greater than one are expected to increase crashes. Figure 9 illustrates the definition of CMFs.

Figure 9 – CMF Calculation
The CMF Method is used to calculate the expected number of crashes by taking the observed number of crashes and multiplying those crashes by the applicable CMF for the proposed countermeasure. It is recommended that CMFs be applied to a minimum of three years of crash data for urban and suburban sites and five years of crash data for a rural site. Figure 10 is a sample calculation of the CMF method with one CMF being applied to a particular site for a single year.

Figure 10 – CMF Method Sample Calculation
37 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 27
A CRF is similar to a CMF but stated in different terms. A CRF is defined as a percentage of crash reduction that might be expected after the implementation of a given countermeasure at a specific site. Figure 11 presents how a CRF is calculated in relationship to a CMF.

Figure 11 – CRF Calculation
Caution should be used in the selection of appropriate CMFs. The following guidance should be considered when selecting CMFs for predictive crash analysis:
 CMFs should be selected from the HSM Part D, the LRSM, or from the FHWA CMF Clearinghouse website (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/).  Read the countermeasure abstract to determine if the CMF is applicable to the proposed improvement.
 Only CMFs with a four-star rating or higher should be considered for use in analysis.  Be sure the selected CMF is applicable to the set of crash data being used for analysis.

Some CMFs may only be applicable to a subset of the crash data.  The application of multiple CMFs can overestimate the expected crash reduction.

Unless each CMF addresses independent crash types, multiple CMFs should not be used. It is suggested that no more than three independent CMFs be applied to a particular site.

The countermeasures proposed in this document were chosen because of their effectiveness in reducing crashes.

8.1.2. Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox
The systemic improvements identified as most likely effective for the City are listed in Table 6, and include low-cost and higher-cost items that can be implemented in phases where appropriate. The CMF indicates how effective the countermeasure is at reducing crashes. CMFs and CRFs have been provided for reference to aid the City in understanding potential reductions from crashes by different countermeasures.
38 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 28
Table 6 – City of Marina Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox Countermeasure
Also Addresses Crash
Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash
Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans
Funding
Cost to
Implement Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian
and Bicycle
Signalized Intersections
Install intersection lighting 0.6 40% X 100% $$
Retroreflective backplates 0.85 15% X 100% $
Improve signal timing (coordination) 0.85 15% X 50% $$
Install Left Turn Lane, Add Left Turn Phase 0.45 55% X 100% $$$ Protected left turn phase 0.7 30% X 100% $$
Convert signal from pedestal-mounted to mast arm 0.7 30% X 100% $$$ Install raised pavement markers and striping 0.9 10% X 100% $ Install flashing beacons as advanced warning 0.7 30% X 100% $$ Install High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) 0.45 55% X 100% $$$ Install raised median on approaches 0.75 25% X 100% $$
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Pedestrian countdown signal heads X 0.75 25% X 100% $
Pedestrian scramble X 0.6 40% X 100% $$
Advanced stop bar before crosswalk and bicycle box X X 0.85 15% X 100% $ Modify signal to provide a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) X 0.4 60% X 100% $ Flashing yellow arrow 0.94 6% X N/A $
Signal ahead warning signs 0.85 15% X N/A $
Unsignalized Intersection
Add intersection lighting 0.6 40% X 100% $$
Install all-way STOP control 0.5 50% X 100% $
Convert intersection to roundabout Varies Varies X 100% $$$ Convert intersection to mini-roundabout 70% 30% X 90% $$ Install/upgrade intersection warning/regulatory signs 0.85 15% X 100% $ Upgrade pavement markings 0.75 25% X 100% $
Install flashing beacons at stop-controlled intersections 0.85 15% X 100% $$ Install flashing beacons as advanced warning 0.7 30% X 100% $$ Clear sight triangles 0.8 20% X 90% $ - $$$
Install High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) 0.55 55% X 100% $$$ 39 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 29
Countermeasure
Also Addresses Crash
Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash
Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans
Funding
Cost to
Implement Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian
and Bicycle
Install splitter-islands on minor road approaches 0.6 40% X 100% $$ Install raised median on approaches 0.75 25% X 90% $$
Directional median openings to restrict turning movements 0.5 50% X 90% $$ Reduced Left-Turn Conflict (R-CUT) intersections 0.5 50% X 90% $$$ Install right-turn lane 0.8 20% X 90% $$
Install left-turn lane 0.65 35% X 90% $$
Pedestrian refuge island X 0.55 45% X 90% $$
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) X 0.65 35% X 100% $ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) X 0.65 35% X 100% $$ Pedestrian Signal X 0.45 55% X 100% $$$
Retroreflective strips on signposts Not Available Not Available X $ Crosswalk lighting X 0.6 40% X 100% $$
Colored bicycle lanes X 0.61 39% X $
Curb extensions X 0.63 37% X $$$
Roadway Segments
Add segment lighting 0.65 35% X 100% $$
Remove or relocate fixed object outside of Clear Recovery Zone 0.65 35% X 90% $$$ Install impact attenuators 0.75 25% X 100% $$
Install pedestrian median fencing X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Install bike lanes X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) X X 0.65 35% X 90% $ Install raised pedestrian crossing X X 0.65 35% X 90% $$ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) X X 0.65 35% X 100% $$ Speed feedback signs (mobile or fixed) Not Available Not Available X Opportunity
for OTS
funding
$
Curve Shoulder Widening (Outside Only) 0.55 45% X 90% $$$ Install chevron signs on horizontal curves 0.60 40% X 100% $ Install curve advance warning signs 0.75 25% X 100% $
Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) 0.70 30% X 100% $$ 40 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 30
Countermeasure
Also Addresses Crash
Modification
Factor (CMF)
Crash
Reduction
Factor (CRF)
CRF Applies to
Caltrans
Funding
Cost to
Implement Pedestrian Bicycle All Nighttime Pedestrian
and Bicycle
Install centerline rumble strips/stripes 0.80 20% X 100% $$ Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes 0.85 15% X 100% $$ Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatment) 0.45 55% X 100% $$$ Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs 0.70 30% X 100% $$ Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning)   0.85 15% X 100% $
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers 0.85 15% X 100% $ $$$ Requires design and construction of extensive infrastructure improvements $$ Requires procurement and/or minor construction activities $ Requires limited staff resources and can be implemented in-house with current engineering and/or maintenance staff 41 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 31

8.1.3. Project Sheets for Priority Locations
From the Citywide analysis, five project case study locations were selected for further analysis and development of safety improvement recommendations. For each of these priority locations, project sheets were developed to provide a case study to organize projects when applying for funding. These locations were identified through the analysis process based on their crash histories, the observed crash patterns, and their differing characteristics to provide the most insight into potential systemic safety countermeasures that the City can employ to achieve the most cost-effective safety benefits.

Each project sheet includes location maps with an aerial, crash data summary, and list of recommended safety countermeasures with corresponding CMFs, number of crashes anticipated to be reduced, 10-year crash reduction estimate and benefit, and planning level construction cost estimates. The potential safety countermeasures identified reflect safety improvements that can be applied to reduce the likelihood of future crashes. Countermeasures were subjected to a benefit/cost assessment to determine their potential return on investment.

These case studies can be used to select the most appropriate countermeasure(s), and to potentially phase improvements over the longer-term. The potential benefit of these countermeasures at locations with similar design characteristics can then be extrapolated regardless of crash history.

These project sheets can also be used to position the City for future grant funding opportunities.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding is allocated to applicants on the criteria of Benefit-cost-ratio (BCR). Each countermeasure in the project sheets has a Benefit-cost-ratio (BCR) associated with it, thus enabling the City to choose which countermeasures it would like to include in a potential HSIP application. Table 7 below presents the BCR cutoffs and the average BCR of selected projects for previous HSIP cycles.

Table 7 – Historical HSIP Cycle Information
Cycle Release
Date
Number of
Applications
Number of
projects
selected
HSIP
funds
approved
($M)
BCR Cutoff
Average
BCR of
selected
projects
4 2/23/11 357 179 $74.5 7.9
5 10/19/12 276 221 $111.3 14.6
6 11/14/13 389 231 $150.0 10.7
7 11/12/15 212 182 $160.0 16.9
8 11/21/16 247 225 $216.9 3.5 10.3
9 12/12/18 351 220 $180.8 7.5 17.7
10 3/30/21 429 268 $238.3 12.0 24.0
Total 2,261 1,526 $1,132.3 14.6
42 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 32
Table 8 presents a summary of the potential safety countermeasures identified for each of the priority locations listed below and corresponding benefit/cost. A project sheet was developed for each of the priority locations containing additional information and are included in Appendix D.  Reservation Road and De Forest Road
 Imjin Parkway and 3
rd Avenue
 Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Ave
 Imjin Parkway Corridor Improvements (from Imjin Road to 2nd Ave)  Reservation Road Corridor Improvements
The Reservation Road corridor improvements include the roadway segments from Del Monte Boulevard to Imjin Parkway, as well as the following signalized intersections:
 Del Monte Boulevard
 Crescent Avenue
 Seacrest Avenue
 De
Forest Road
 Vista Del Camino
 California Avenue
 Marina Square Eas
tern Driveway
43 City of Marina LRSP July 2022
33 Table 8 – Priority Location Summary

Location  Potential Countermeasures  B/C
Reservation Road and De Forest
Road
Install pedestrian crossings (S.I.)  26
Modify signal phasing to implement LPI  90
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle
Box)  70
Add intersection lighting  5
Install raised medians (refuge islands)  16
Reservation Road Corridor
Install Retroreflective Backplates  25
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red,
yellow, or operation)  54
Provide Advanced Dilemma‐Zone Detection for high
speed approaches  18
Install emergency vehicle pre‐emption systems   0.0
Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through
Intersection)  15
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading
Pedestrian Interval (LPI)  20
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs  15
Install Separated Bike Lanes  0.0
Imjin Parkway and 3rd Ave
Install traffic signal  14
Add intersection lighting  433
Stripe ladder crosswalk and Class II Bicycle Crosswalks  163 Install Retroreflective Backplates  167
Interconnect to 2nd Ave Signal  67
Roadway Paving ‐ HMA conform sidewalk (2') ‐
Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) ‐
Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) ‐
Imjin Parkway Corridor
Install Retroreflective Backplates  46
Coordinate the signals at 2nd, California and Abrams  84 Provide Advanced Dilemma‐Zone Detection for high
speed approaches  28
Install emergency vehicle pre‐emption systems   0.2
Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through
Intersection)  76
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs  82
Del Monte Boulevard and Beach
Road
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers  265 Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs   310
Road Diet (Merge the lanes in the NB approach to the
Roundabout)  742
Install a fence in the median of the NB approach to
limit line of sight  0
44 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 34

9. E MPHASIS AREAS

9.1. Emphasis Area 1: Reduce Aggres sive Driving Behavior Description:

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) describes aggressive driving as speeding or driving too fast for roadway conditions, tailgating, and other forms of reckless driving maneuvers such as weaving through traffic. Aggressive driving often includes instances where drivers disobey or run traffic signals and signs. Under the SHSP a collision may be deemed as an aggressive driving collision if any of the aforementioned criteria are documented but not necessarily the primary collision factor. In the past five years, there have been 557 crashes attributed to aggressive driving, four of which resulted in serious injury. Of these aggressive driving collisions, 470 (85%) were a result of unsafe speed, 52 (9%) were related to traffic signal and sign violation, and 35 (6%) were a result of following too closely. Nearly three-quarters of the aggressive driving collisions (396 in total) were rear-end collisions with the second highest collision type being hit object collisions at a total of 58.

Data Finding
The City and its safety partners identified aggressive driving as a safety concern. In the 5-year study period, 37% of all crashes involved aggressive driving. Rear-end crashes, which are closely related to aggressive driving, are the most common crash type in the City.

Goals:
 Reduce annual aggressive driving collisions.

Strategies:
 Install speed warning signs at “high risk” intersections  Implement advanced dilemma zone detection
 Coordinate traffic signals along corridors to reduce speeding  Consider the use of geometric roadway changes to reduce speeding  Install speed feedback signs along corridors with history of speeding  Conduct routine speed surveys to keep speed limits current and enforceable  Enforce legislation that specifically penalizes aggressive driving  Target key intersections and road segments and review striping and signage through roadway safety assessments
 Organize targeted education campaign on safety problems at “high risk” intersections  Additional focused traffic enforcement presence using an equity lens 45 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 35

9.2. Emphasis Area 2: Improve Visibility and Lighting
Description:

Visibility is an important factor in roadway safety that benefits drivers and active transportation users. Improving roadway visibility includes installing and/or maintaining street lighting, retroreflective backplates on signals and signs, and roadway striping. Between 2015-2019, of the 1,500 total collisions, 349 occurred while it was dark with streetlights and 32 occurred while it was dark with no streetlights. Of these dark condition collisions, 14 collisions involved a pedestrian or bicyclist. As the City expands and encourage active transportation use, it is important to make infrastructure improvements that ensure all roadway user safety at all times of the day.

Data Finding
Out of the 349 crashes not occurring during daylight, the most common type of crash is rear-ends (29%). Aside from the improvements to the safety of active transportation users, improved lighting and visibility can significantly reduce the number of collisions that result in some form of property damage.

Goals:
 Improve, enhance, or install intersection and segment lighting throughout the City.

Strategies:

Incorporate other visibility improvements such as:
 Improved roadway and intersection lighting
 Retroreflective backplates on signals and signs
 Retroreflective poles
 Retroreflective warning signs on curved roadways
 High visibility marked crosswalks
 Pedestrian crossing warning signs at pedestrian dense locations and transit hubs  Advanced stop bars
 Curb extensions and/or curb bulb-outs where feasible
 Emergency Vehicle Preemption
46 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 36

9.3. Non-Infrastructu re Countermeasures
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Countermeasures that Work, Ninth Edition, is a reference to assist safety stakeholders in selecting effective, science-based non-infrastructure traffic safety countermeasures for major highway safety problem areas.

While many of the countermeasures are more appropriate to apply at the state-level or require legislative modifications to implement, Table 9 contains countermeasures that have demonstrated effectiveness and could be applied at the City level. Access to Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) training for law enforcement is not included in the document but is something that could also be considered for the City. These non-infrastructure countermeasures can be implemented through securing grant funding such as California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grants and other federal, state, and regional funding programs presented in Section 10.

Table 9 – Non-Infrastructure Countermeasures Toolbox
Countermeasure Effectiveness Cost to
Implement Use Time to
Implement
Impaired Driving
Publicized Sobriety Checkpoints ***** $$$ Medium Short
High-Visibility Saturation Patrols **** $$ High Short
Occupant Protection (Seat Belts, Helmets, Child Seats)
Short-term high visibility
enforcement
***** $$$ Medium Medium
Integrated nighttime seat belt
enforcement
**** $$$ Unknown Medium
Distracted Driving
High visibility cellphone/text
messaging enforcement
**** $$$ Low Medium
Effectiveness:
***** Demonstrated to be effective by several high quality evaluations with consistent results **** Demonstrated to be effective in certain situations Cost to Implement:
$$$ Requires extensive new facilities, staff, equipment, or publicity, or makes heavy demands on current resources $$ Requires some additional staff time, equipment, facilities, and/or publicity $ Can be implemented with current staff, perhaps with training; limited costs for equipment, facilities, and publicity †Can be covered by income from citations
Use:

High: More than two-thirds of states, or a substantial majority of communities Medium: Between one-third and two-thirds of states or communities Low: Less than one-third of states or communities
Unknown: Data not available
Time to Implement:

Long: More than 1 year
Medium: More than 3 months but less than 1 year
Short: 3 months or less
47 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 37

10. E VALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

10.1. Evaluation
The success of the LRSP will be evaluated using the preliminary process outlined below. This process will be useful to ensure proper implementation of goals and to determine when updates are needed.
 Quarterly progress meetings are recommended to be conducted to track the implementation of the plan. In addition, the success of the plan will be evaluated on a reoccurring basis.
 An update to the plan should be considered after no more than five to seven years.  Continued monitoring and recording of traffic incidents on local roadways by law enforcement.
 Maintain a list of focus areas where there are transportation safety concerns, based on historical crash data.

10.2. Implementation
Implementation of the LRSP can be accomplished through several avenues including development of projects, the establishment of new policies and programs, and development/strengthening of relationships with stakeholders.

With regard to projects, the following identifies potential focus areas for the City in the near-to- mid-term.

10.2.1. Near- and Mid-Term Focus Areas
The opportunities identified in this LRSP provide more of the systemic countermeasures that can be applied within the City. Over the next three to five years, it is recommended that the City concentrate its efforts on the following emphasis areas:
 Aggressive Driving
 Visibility and Lighting
 Pedestrians
 Bicyclists
Analysis conducted at the Citywide level indicated that these factors were some of the most frequent influences contributing to K+SI crashes within the City. The countermeasure opportunities previously discussed in this LRSP for both systemic and project-specific improvements can be used as a basis for developing projects at locations where addressing these focus areas would be of the most benefit. Projects that address these focus areas can be developed with a high benefit-to-cost ratio (by applying Citywide crash rates), allowing competitive projects to be developed even at sites with little to no direct crash history, but with conditions that might contribute to future crashes.
48 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 38

10.3. Updates to the LRSP
The following steps outline the process for updating the City’s LRSP every 5 to 7 years. 1) Access necessary data
 Roadway and intersection classification/configurations  Average Daily Traffic Volumes (Collected from counts where available)  Collision history
2) Network screening
 Calculate the CCR for each roadway functional classification and intersection control type
 Rank for each facility type
i) Roadway
Segment
(1) Primary
(2) Secondary
(3) Local
ii) Intersection
(1) Signalized
(2) Unsignalized
3) Select locations
 Identify the location with a higher CCR than what is typical of comparable facility
types within City
 Analyze the collision history and work with local officials to understand any significant exterior influences on the location
4) Countermeasures
 Using the Engineering Countermeasures Toolbox (Table 6) and Non-Infrastructure Toolbox (Table 9), identify potential countermeasures that can be applied to the local to enhance safety features
5) Develop a Project Sheet that can serve as a template for analyzing future locations 6) Calculate the benefit and the cost of each applicable countermeasure using Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) tool and LRSM countermeasures. If those are not available, refer to other resources such as the CMF Clearinghouse and follow a similar calculation (using 20-year cost and benefit numbers). See more information in the section HSIP Analyzer below.

The LRSP has completed steps 1 through 6. In subsequent years, the City can begin at step 1 to continue the LRSP process. Additional items the City can do to keep the LRSP current are:
1) When new or reconstruction projects arise, use the data processed to identify locations with similar characteristics and apply countermeasures which proved effective 2) Proactively update its roadway and traffic st andards to address systemic safety issues identified in the LRSP
49 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 39

10.3.1. HSIP Analyzer
As of 2021, the preferred way to calculate the BCR for the HSIP program uses Caltrans HSIP Analyzer tool in the form of an active PDF. The PDF tool contains 4 sections which are used to calculate the Benefit Cost Ratio for the Highway Safety Improvement Program.

This tool can be accessed on the Caltrans website:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety- improvement-program/apply-now
Projects appropriate for other state grant programs can be analyzed using the Life-Cycle Benefit Cost Analysis Model (CalB/C) which has a much more comprehensive benefit assessment tool set.

10.3.2. HSIP Eligibility
Per Chapter 9 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program, funds are eligible for projects that improve the safety of its users on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail, or on tribal lands for general use of tribal members.

HSIP looks for safety projects that can be designed and constructed expeditiously and do not require significant acquisition of rights-of-way. Proposed projects should not require extensive environmental review and mitigation. Additional information on the HSIP project selection criteria can be accessed online:
 Benefit Cost Ratio Applications
https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local-
assistance/documents/hsip/2020/hsipanalyzerinstructions2020bcr.pdf  Funding Set-asides (Non-Benefit Cost Ratio Applications) https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local-
assistance/documents/hsip/2020/hsipanalyzerinstructions2020sa.pdf HSIP project eligibility is subject to the California SHSP. The SHSP identifies statewide challenge areas that correspond to safety concerns at the statewide level and potential countermeasure to address them and determine HSIP project eligibility. SHSP’s are developed in compliance with FHWA requirements. A list of eligible project types can be seen in the current HSIP Analyzer. More information can be accessed online at the Caltrans HSIP grant website:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety- improvement-program/apply-now

10.4. Funding
Competitive funding resources are available to assist in the development and implementation of safety projects in City of Marina. The City should continue to seek available funding and grant opportunities from local, state, and federal resources to accelerate their ability to implement safety improvements throughout the City of Marina. The following is a high-level introduction into some of the main funding programs and grants for which the City can apply. 50 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 40

10.4.1. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a Federal program housed under Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. This program apportions funding as a lump sum for each state, which is then divided among apportioned programs. These flexible funds can be used for projects to preserve or improve safety conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, facilities for non-motorized transportation, and other project types. Safety improvement projects eligible for this funding include:
 New or upgraded traffic signals
 Upgraded guard rails
 Marked crosswalks
California’s local HSIP focuses on infrastructure projects with national recognized crash reduction factors. Normally HSIP call-for-projects is made at an interval of one to two years. The applicant must be a city, a City, or a tribal government federally recognized within the State of California.

Additional information regarding this program at the Federal level is available at:
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/. California specific HSIP information – including dates for upcoming call for projects – is available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.html.

10.4.2. Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP)
Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a statewide funding program, created in 2013, consolidating several federal and state programs. The ATP funds projects that encourage increased mode share for walking and bicycling, improve mobility and safety for non-motorized users, enhance public health, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Projects eligible for this funding include:
 Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects
 Bicycle and pedestrian planning projects (e.g. safe routes to school)  Non-infrastructure programs (education and enforcement) This program funding is provided annually. The ATP call for projects typically comes out in the spring. Information on this program and cycles can be found online:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/

10.4.3. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) provides state and federal gas tax money for improvements both on and off the state highway system. STIP programming occurs every two years. The programming cycle begins with the release of a proposed fund estimate, followed by California Transportation Commission (CTC) adoption of the fund estimate. The fund estimate serves to identify the amount of new funds available for the programming of transportation projects. Once the fund estimate is adopted, Caltrans and the regional planning agencies prepare transportation improvement plans for submittal. Caltrans prepares the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) using Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds, and regional agencies prepare Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIPs) using Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. The STIP is then adopted by the CTC.
51 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 41

10.4.4. California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)
SB 1 is a landmark transportation investment to rebuild California by fixing neighborhood streets, freeways and bridges in communities across California and targeting funds toward transit and congested trade and commute corridor improvements.

California’s state-maintained transportation infrastructure will receive roughly half of SB 1 revenue: $26 billion. The other half will go to local roads, transit agencies and an expansion of the state’s growing network of pedestrian and cycle routes. Each year, this new funding will be used to tackle deferred maintenance needs both on the state highway system and the local road system, including:
 Bike and Pedestrian Projects: $100 million
 This will go to cities, counties and regional transportation agencies to build or convert more bike paths, crosswalks and sidewalks. It is a significant increase in funding for these projects through the Active Transportation Program (ATP).  Local Planning Grants: $25 million

10.4.5. California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grants This program has funding for projects related to traffic safety, including transportation safety education and encouragement activities. Grants applications must be supported by local crash data (such as the data analyzed in this LRSP) and must relate to the following priority program areas:
 Alcohol Impaired Driving
 Distracted Driving
 Drug-Impaired Emergency Medical Services
 Motorcycle Safety
 Occupant Protection
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
 Police Traffic Services
 Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program
 Roadway Safety and Traffic Records

10.4.6. SACOG Regional Funding Programs
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) provides funding allocation for various multi-modal transportation projects in the Sacramento region. Projects that are considered for this regional funding program must be eligible for CMAQ, RSTP, or STIP funds.

Performance outcomes which are considered for selection include those which:
 Reduce regional VMT per capita
 Reduce regional congest VMT per capita
 Increase multi-modal or alternative travel choices
 Provide long term benefits, sustaining both rural and urban economies  Improve movement of goods, in and through the region
 Improve safety and security
 Maintain and improve upon the existing transportation system 52 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 42

10.4.7. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
The US DOT released a notice of funding opport
unity for the Safe Streets and Roads for All
(SS4A) program in 2022. This program has allocated $1B annually for the next 4 years for local cities, counties, MPOs, and other roadway owners (excepting state DOTs) for safety improvement grants for safety planning, education, enforcement, and roadway improvements.

Evaluation criteria are oriented to the project’s alignment with the Safe Systems approach, and not strictly based on BCR.
 There is a 20% local match requirement (can be in-kind contribution via staff billable hours)
 Planning grants are open to any eligible agency
 Implementation grants are open to agencies with a completed safety plan such as a Local Road Safety Plan for Vision Zero
 Planning grants are expected to range from $100K to $1M  Implementation grants are expected to range from $1M to $20M 53 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 43

11. N EXT STEPS
The City of Marina has completed this LRSP to guide the process of future transportation safety improvements for years to come. The data-driven analysis process identified crash types, related primary crash factors, and locations of many crashes. Based on this process, emphasis areas were identified. These emphasis areas will guide traffic safety improvements, education programs, and capital improvements for the City. Using the analyzed data and outputs from this LRSP, the City will:
 Apply for HSIP grant funding for safety improvements throughout the City that address the various emphasis areas identified, including intersections and lane departures  Actively seek other funding opportunities to improve safety for all modal users  Collaborate with established stakeholders and neighboring municipalities (i.e. Monterey County, TAMC, Monterey Salinas Transit (MST))) as improvements are made to create a cohesive transportation network
 Iteratively evaluate existing and proposed transportation safety programs and capital improvements to design and operate a safer transportation network in the City of Marina  Complete annual review of safety data
54 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 Appendix

APPENDIX A

LITERATURE REVIEW
55 ID Document Name Year Agency Document Description Transportation Improvements / Policies Safety 1 Monterey County Active
Transportation Plan 2018
Transportation
Agency for
Monterey County
(TAMC)
-Identifies gaps in the bike and ped
network
-The recommended projects can possibly be funded by Measure X -Top priority local projects include:

1. Reservation Rd between Del Monte Blvd to Salinas Ave, and from Salinas Ave to Blanco Rd

2. Imjin Rd/12th St from Imjin Road to Reservation Road

3. Cardoza Ave from Beach Road to the end of Cardoza Ave -Marina in 2017 had a population of 21,528
-0.8% bike to work, 3.1% walk to work
-Between 2010 and 2016, bikes and peds accounted for 13.6% of crashes in Monterey county and 21.6% of crashes in Marina
-Most ped crashes occurred along Reservation, Beach, Del Monte, Imjin and California
-Most bike crashes occurred along Del Monte, Imjin, and in the grid by Crescent/Hillcrest
-Bike and Ped Committee requests improvements to the intersections of Del Monte Blvd & Palm Ave and Carmel Ave & Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail -See Page 132-135 for list of proposed projects
2 City of Marina Pedestrian and
Bicycle Master Plan 2018
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department
The Marina Pedestrian and Bicycle
Master Plan (Plan) has three
primary purposes: providing
guidelines for facilities
improvements, positioning the City
for grants to finance improvements,
and playing a role in the City’s work
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
-The Monterey Bay Coastal Bike Path trail passes through Marina, connecting the city to Castorville
-Limited Class II bike lanes within the city (primarily along Reservation Road, California Avenue, and Beach Road west of Del Monte Boulevard)
-Pedestrian roadway crossing distances should be as short as possible to reduce pedestrian exposure time; pedestrian refuge islands should be used for wider streets
-Curb extensions and median noses should be used where feasible to reduce the speed of turning motorists. Short signal cycles are encouraged to promote red signal compliance
-Pg 45 map of proposed ped facilities,
-Pg 49 map of proposed bike facilities
-Bike lane striping and ped xing striping should be thermoplastic -Pg 69 lists design considerations for mid-block crossings -pg 86 Ped infrastructure deficiencies
-pg 87 Bike infrastructure deficiencies
-pg 88 List of priority projects
3 Seaside & Marina Safe Walking
& Biking to School: Complete
Streets Plan
2020
Transportation
Agency for
Monterey County
Provides development framework
for the planned community
-According to the study, "One in ten Marina residents lives in a disadvantaged neighborhood, where 53% of households live in poverty, 16% lack access to a car, and nearly 30% of residents over the age of 25 have no
high school education."
-21% of people involved in bike related vehicle crashes are 14 years old or younger -TAMC also collected ADT data
4 City of Marina General Plan 2010 City of Marina at
Monterey Bay
The plan has two goals: 1) To guide
daily and long-term planning and
development decisions by the City
in a manner consistent with stated
City goals and 2) To provide clear
documentation of the City’s goals
and commitments
-pg 85 map of roads by type
-pg 92 transit map
- Transit service in Marina is limited, provided by Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) -Streets such as De Forest Road, Crescent Avenue, Beach Road east of Del Monte Boulevard, and Carmel Avenue are to remain 2 lanes
-City desired LOS D or better along all highway segments and major roads -Existing and future ADT values are presented for major roadways in Table 3.1.A and for collectors in Table 3.1.B
-Right-turn lanes are prohibited for the sections of arterials which pass through residential areas
5 2021 Resurfacing Project 2021 City of Marina
Public Works
Map and list of locations to receive
slurry seal treatment
-Slurry seal schedule shows which streets are receiving treatments https://cityofmarina.org/142/Street-Maintenance
6 A message from the Marina
Traffic Unit 2015 Marina Police
Department
Memo from PD describing speeding
along Imjin and enhanced efforts to
enforce speed limits
-Speeding is a recurring issue at Imjin Parkway
-City will enforece speed limits with the use of LIDAR
https://www.cityofmarina.org/DocumentCenter/View/4982/A-message-from-the- Marina-Traffic-Unit?bidId=
56 Excerpt from the 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan, Pages 123-134 57 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
123 | P a g e

5.7 Marina
Demographic Profile
The City of Marina is in the Monterey Peninsula
with 21,528 people, as reported by the
California Department of Finance 2017 data.

The median age in Marina is 36, which is slightly
older than the median age of 33 countywide.

Approximately 13.6% of Marina’s population is
younger than 18 years old. Marina was home to
the former Fort Ord, and currently is home to
the most ethnically diverse population in the
County: 45% are white, 27% Latino, 13% Pacific
Islander, 10% Asian, 8% African American.

Disadvantaged Communities
Active transportation investments are
particularly crucial for disadvantaged
communities, as these tend to have higher
walking and bicycling mode shares. In Marina,
approximately 2,200 residents live in a
disadvantaged neighborhood where 53% of
households live in poverty, 16% do not have
access to a car, and nearly 30% have no high
school education1. In addition, Marina is home
to disadvantaged populations as defined by the
California Health Disadvantaged Index and the
CalEnviroScreen 3.0.

Safety Profile
In the City of Marina, from 2010 to 2016,
bicycle and pedestrian collisions made up a
significant number of all collisions. Of the 305
collisions in Marina between 2010 and 2016
there were 66 collisions that involved bicyclists
and pedestrians. Meaning that bicyclists and
pedestrians accounted for 21.6% or 1 out of
1 Health Disadvantage Index for California:
http://phasocal.org/ca-hdi/
every 5 collisions. This is alarming given the fact
that bicycling and walking mode shares in
Marina are approximately 2.6% and 1.1%
respectively.

The following charts and maps provide a
detailed statistical profile of bike and pedestrian
collisions from 2010 to 2016 based on data
from the UC Berkeley Traffic Injury Mapping
System. Blank values in the charts represent
zeros for those categories and years. A chart
showing non-pedestrian and non-bicycle
collisions is also presented to provide context
for the analysis during this time.
58 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
124 | P a g e
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Y
Y
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2-Severe Injury 1 1
3-Complaint of Pain 4 2 1 2 1 5
4-Other Visible Injury 1 3 1 2 1 1 2
Bicycle Collisions by Injury Severity: 2010 - 2016
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Y
Y
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2-Severe Injury 1 1 1 1
3-Other Visible Injury 2 1 2 3 4 3 2
4-Complaint of Pain 3 2 3 1 5 3
Pedestrian Collisions by Injury Severity: 2010 - 2016
59 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
125 | P a g e
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2-Severe Injury 2 3 1 4
3-Other Visible Injury 6 7 11 11 11 8 2
4-Complaint of Pain Injury 33 17 34 24 30 30 5
Vehicle Collisions by Injury Severity: 2010 - 2016
60 !!
!
!
!
!

IMJINPKWY
9TH ST
CALIFO
RNIA
AVE

DEL MONTE BLVD
Pacific Ocean

PATTON PKWY

DE FOREST RD
MARINA

SEASIDE
Locke
Paddon
Park
Ã1
1ST ST

INTER-GARRISON RD

IMJIN RD
5TH AVE
4TH
AVE

BEACH RD
3RD ST

HILLCREST AVE

ENGINEERING E QUIPMENTRD SCHOONOVER
RD

CRESCENT AVE
2ND AVE
1ST AVE
12THST
BEACH
RANGE
RD

LAPIS RD

REINDOLLAR AVE
8TH ST

CARMEL AVE

HAYESCIR
BLANCO
RD

COOPER RD
3RD AVE

ABRAMS DR

NASHUA RD

DEL MONTE BLVD

RESERVATIONRD

CABRILLO
HW
Y

CLARK CT

WILSON CT

KISKA CT
EDDE
C T
COSKY
D R
Marina
Municipal
Airport
Fort Ord
Dunes
State Park
Abrams
Park
Vince
DiMaggio
Park
Preston
Park
Glorya Jean
Tate Park
Marina
State
Beach
Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
Data provided by
Monterey County TAMC,
UC Berkeley TIMS 2010-2016.

T errain data by ESRI, NOAA.

Map produced October 2017
by Alta Planning + Design.

MONTEREY
COUNTY

SAN BENITO
COUNTY
FRESNO
COUNTY
KINGS
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY

SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY

SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
Points of Interest
K-12 School
! College/University
! City Hall
! Transit Center
! Public Library
Land Use
Park/Open Space
Cal State Monterey Bay
Commercial Area
City Boundary
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Uphill bikeway
(Slope > 4%)

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY Map Area
0 ½ 1
MILES
¯
Marina
1 2 - 3
Pedestrian Collisions
61 !!
!
!
!
!

IMJINPKWY
9TH ST
CALIFO
RNIA
AVE

DEL MONTE BLVD
Pacific Ocean

PATTON PKWY

DE FOREST RD
MARINA

SEASIDE
Locke
Paddon
Park
Ã1
1ST ST

INTER-GARRISON RD

IMJIN RD
5TH AVE
4TH
AVE
BEACH
RD
3RD ST

HILLCREST AVE

ENGINEERING E QUIPMENTRD SCHOONOVER
RD

CRESCENT AVE
2ND AVE
1ST AVE
12THST
BEACH
RANGE
RD

LAPIS RD

REINDOLLARAVE
8TH ST

CARMEL AVE

HAYESCIR
BLANCO
RD

COOPER RD
3RD AVE

ABRAMS DR

NASHUA RD

DEL MONTE BLVD

RESERVATIONRD

CABRILLO
HW
Y

CLARK CT

WILSON CT

KISKA CT
EDDE
C T
COSKY
D R
Marina
Municipal
Airport
Fort Ord
Dunes
State Park
Abrams
Park
Vince
DiMaggio
Park
Preston
Park
Glorya Jean
Tate Park
Marina
State
Beach
Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
Data provided by
Monterey County TAMC,
UC Berkeley TIMS 2010-2016.

T errain data by ESRI, NOAA.

Map produced October 2017
by Alta Planning + Design.

MONTEREY
COUNTY

SAN BENITO
COUNTY
FRESNO
COUNTY
KINGS
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY

SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY

SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
Points of Interest
K-12 School
! College/University
! City Hall
! Transit Center
! Public Library
Land Use
Park/Open Space
Cal State Monterey Bay
Commercial Area
City Boundary
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Uphill bikeway
(Slope > 4%)

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY Map AreaMarina
1 2
3 - 5
Bicycle Collisions
0 ½ 1
MILES
¯
62 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
128 | P a g e
Plans, Programs & Policies
This Active Transportation Plan builds on the
goals, policies, objectives and programs of other
Marina Plans. The bicycle and pedestrian
improvements identified in the City’s Plans are
included in this Active Transportation Plan.

Marina General Plan
Marina adopted its most current General Plan
in 2000. The following goals, policies and
objectives support the projects in this Plan:
• Community Goal 1.17: The overall
goal of the Marina General Plan is the
creation of a community which
provides a high quality of life for all its
residents; which offers a broad range
of housing, transportation, and
recreation choices; and which
conserves irreplaceable natural
resources.
• Community Infrastructure Policy

3.3.2: The City of Marina shall ensure
that walking and bicycling routes are
integral parts of street design and
form a safe and preferred
transportation network.
• Community Infrastructure Policy

3.3.7: The City of Marina shall
coordinate with surrounding
jurisdictions and agencies, such as
TAMC…to pursue projects that
develop new pedestrian and bicycle
routes and that improve and maintain
existing pedestrian and bicycle routes.

New routes shall be linked to existing
routes wherever possible. The City
shall coordinate with these entities to
apply for regional funds.
• Community Infrastructure Policy

3.3.16: The City of Marina shall
consider incorporating facilities, such
as bikeways, sidewalks and
recreational trails for non-vehicular
users, when constructing or improving
transportation facilities and when
reviewing new development and
redevelopment proposals.

Marina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan
Marina adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle
Master Plan in 2010. This Master Plan is a is a
comprehensive and long-range planning
document focused on documenting and
improving pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The
Master Plan provides guidelines, existing and
proposed facilities, safety and education
programs and a description of community
engagement. The projects listed in this Master
Plan are included in this Active Transportation
Plan.

Seaside and Marina Safe Walking and Biking to
School Plan
The Seaside and Marina Safe Biking and Walking
to School Plan is a partnership between the
Cities of Marina, Seaside, TAMC, the Monterey
County Health Department, and Ecology Action.

The Safe Walking and Biking Plan will provide
the cities of Marina and Seaside with a
comprehensive approach and tools to reduce
the barriers to walking, biking, taking the bus
and carpooling to school. This plan will provide
the basis for future investments in
infrastructure by the local Measure X Safe
Routes to Schools program, the SB 1 local road
rehabilitation program, and the infrastructure
portion of the Active Transportation Program.
63 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
129 | P a g e
This Safe Walking and Biking Plan will kick-off in
2018, and will likely result in additional projects
beyond those listed here.

Public Comments
In addition to including projects identified in
other City of Marina Plans, the improvements
included in the Active Transportation Plan draw
from this Plan’s extensive public outreach
campaign. The following table describes the
comments received from the TAMC Bicycle and
Pedestrian Committee, the TAMC Technical
Advisory Committee and through public
participation via the online Wikimapping tool.

Pedestrian Improvements
• Pedestrian connectivity improvements
between the Marina Library and the
Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail
• Intersection improvements at
o Del Monte Blvd & Palm Ave
o Carmel Ave & Monterey Bay
Sanctuary Scenic Trail
Bicycling Improvements
• Bike Route (Sharrows) for:
o Dunes Dr
o Marina Green Dr
o Healy Ave
o Abdy Way
o Cardoza Ave
o Beach Rd
o De Forest Rd
o Seacrest Ave
o Carmel Ave
• Bike lanes at:
o Abrams Dr
o Reindollar Ave
o Bostick Ave
o Bayer St
• Protected bike lanes along Reservation
Rd
64 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
130 | P a g e
Proposed Projects
The following table represents recommended active transportation projects. The projects are ranked based on their priority within the City of Marina. Projects that scored within the top 25% of projects countywide are noted as regional priorities.

Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements
Rank ATP ID# Name Location Type Length
(miles)
Cost
Estimate Notes
1 MAR-1 Reservation Rd Salinas Ave Del Monte
Blvd
protected
bike lane 1.39 $1,660,633 *Regional
priority
2 MAR-7 Reservation Rd Salinas Ave Blanco Rd bike lane 1.39 $72,950 *Regional priority
3 MAR-6 Imjin Rd/12th
St Imjin Rd Reservation
Rd bike lane 2.72 $142,453 *Regional
priority
4 MAR-30 Crescent Ave Reservation
Rd
end of
Reservation
Rd
bike lane 0.49 $25,829
5 MAR-28 Beach Rd Monte Rd Costa del
Mar Rd bike route 0.65 $7,850
6 MAR-27 Cardoza Ave Beach Rd end of
Cardoza Ave
protected
bike lane 0.49 $585,403 *City of Marina
priority
7 MAR-33 Carmel Ave Sunset Ave Salinas Ave bike route 1.27 $3,473 7 MAR-31 Seacrest Ave Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd bike route 0.29 $15,040
9 MAR-35 Reindollar Ave Bostick Ave Monte Rd bike route 1.27 $15,426 10 MAR-36 Hillcrest Ave Redwood Dr end of
Hillcrest Ave bike route 0.84 $10,151
11 MAR-10 Robin Dr Lake Dr Reservation
Rd bike route 0.02 $290
12 MAR-38 Patton Pkwy
Path
Reindollar
Ave Patton Pkwy bike path 0.50 $381,486
13 MAR-2 Marina Green
Dr
Del Monte
Blvd Paul Davis Dr bike lane 0.09 $4,611
14 MAR-21 Carmel Ave Sunset Ave Monte Rd bike route 0.16 $1,982 15 MAR-8 Imjin Rd 8th St 12th St bike lane 0.33 $17,044 16 MAR-14 Crestview Ct Reservation
Rd
end of
Crestview Ct bike lane 0.12 $6,222
17 MAR-23 Neeson Rd Imjin Rd end of
Neeson Rd bike route 0.53 $6,374
17 MAR-29 de Forest Rd Costa del Mar
Rd
Reservation
Rd bike route 0.40 $4,894
65 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
131 | P a g e
Rank ATP ID# Name Location Type Length
(miles)
Cost
Estimate Notes
18 MAR-24 Viking Ln Reservation
Rd Peninsula Dr bike route 0.11 $1,391
19 MAR-12 Lynscott Dr Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd bike route 0.31 $3,704
20 MAR-9 Salinas Ave Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd bike route 0.27 $3,322
22 MAR-11 Lake Dr Robin Dr 174' E of Hwy
1 bike route 0.51 $6,194
22 MAR-18 Crescent St Reindollar
Ave
end of
Crescent St bike route 0.13 $1,613
22 MAR-22 Palm Ave Lake Dr Clarke Pl bike route 0.03 $340 22 MAR-32 Palm Ave Lake Dr Sunset Ave bike route 0.35 $4,289 26 MAR-34 Bayer St -
Bostick Ave
Reindollar
Ave
Reservation
Rd bike route 0.59 $7,126
26 MAR-37 Sunset Ave Reindollar
Ave Carmel Ave bike route 0.28 $3,430
28 MAR-13 Bayer Dr Bostick Ave end of Bayer
Dr bike route 0.42 $5,052
29 MAR-39
Bayer Dr -
California Ave
MUP
Carmel
Ave/Salinas
Ave
California
Ave bike route 0.86 $10,429
30 MAR-26 Melanie Rd Peninsula Dr Beach Rd bike route 0.33 $4,047 31 MAR-19 Vaughn Ave Reindollar
Ave Carmel Ave bike route 0.28 $3,439
31 MAR-3 Paul Davis Rd Marina Green
Dr Healy Ave bike lane 0.21 $2,553
31 MAR-42 Lake Dr 174' E of Hwy
1 end of Lake
Dr bike lane 0.29 $3,551
34 MAR-15 Redwood Dr Reindollar
Ave
end of
Redwood Dr bike route 0.35 $4,281
35 MAR-20 Crescent Ave +
Extension Hillcrest Ave Carmel Ave bike lane 0.14 $7,591 36 MAR-16 Berney Dr Reindollar
Ave Hillcrest Ave bike route 0.10 $1,183
37 MAR-25 Peninsula Dr Viking Ln Melanie Rd bike route 0.03 $372 37 MAR-5 Healy Ave Marina Dr Abby Way bike route 0.15 $1,755 39 MAR-17 Ellen Ct Reindollar
Ave
end of Ellen
Ct bike route 0.15 $1,818
39 MAR-4 Abby Way Aaron Way Drew St bike route 0.47 $5,687 66 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
132 | P a g e
Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements
Location Start End Type Description Miles Cost
Abdy Way Healy Ave Drew St Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.31 $1,142,381 Beach Rd Cardoza
Ave
Fitzgerald
Cir
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.52 $1,916,252
Begonia
Cir/Michael Dr
Beach Rd Turn in
Michael Dr
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.13 $479,063
Cardoza Ave Abdy Way Belle Dr Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.1 $368,510 Carmel Ave Bayer
Street
Salinas Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.06 $221,106
Carmel Ave Crescent
Ave
Vaughan
Ave
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.08 $294,808
Carmel Ave Del Monte
Blvd
Sunset Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.16 $589,616
Carmel Ave (both
sides)
Seacrest
Ave
Crescent
Ave
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.28 $1,031,828
Cresent Ave Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.27 $994,977
Del Monte Blvd Palm Ave Mortimer
Lane
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.17 $626,467
Del Monte Blvd Reservation
Road
Beach Road Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.44 $1,621,444
Del Monte Blvd &
Palm Ave
Intersection Restripe
Crosswalks
$1,120*
*striping cost only
Del Monte Blvd &
Reservtion Rd
Intersection Restriping:

Remove
one of two
right turn
lanes;
Restripe
Crosswalks
*TBD
Drew St Abdy Way Lakewood
Dr
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.34 $1,252,934
Healy Ave Abdy Way Marina
Drive
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.15 $552,765
Lake Dr Messinger
Dr
Hilo Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.24 $884,424
Marina Drive Legion Way Healy Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.08 $294,808 Paddon Pl Lake Dr Marina Dr Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.16 $589,616 Palm Ave Elm Ave Sunset Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.11 $405,361 Redwood Drive Hillcrest
Ave
Carmel Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.12 $442,212
67 2018 Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
133 | P a g e
Reindollar Ave California
Ave
Eddy Circle Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.08 $294,808
Reindollar Ave Vera Lane Vaughan
Ave
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.16 $589,616
Reindollar Ave Del Monte
Blvd
Sunset Ave Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.18 $663,318
Reservation Rd Crestview
Ct
Lynscott Dr Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.36 $1,326,636
Salinas Ave Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd
Sidewalk Sidewalks 0.27 $994,977
Seacrest Ave Carmel Ave Reservation
Rd
Sidewalk No
Description

0.29 $1,068,679
Zanetta Dr Reindollar
Ave
Hillcrest
Ave
Sidewalk Sidewalk 0.13 $479,063
68 !!
!
!
!
!
Pacific Ocean

PATTON PKWY

DE FOREST RD
MARINA

SEASIDE
Ã1
1ST ST

INTER-GARRISON RD

IMJIN RD
5TH AVE
4TH
AVE

BEACH RD
3RD ST

HILLCREST AVE

ENGINEERING E QUIPMENTRD SCHOONOVER
RD

CRESCENT AVE
2ND AVE
1ST AVE
12THST
BEACH
RANGE
RD

LAPIS RD

REINDOLLAR AVE
8TH ST

CARMEL AVE

HAYESCIR
BLANCO
RD

COOPER RD
3RD AVE

ABRAMS DR

NASHUA RD

DEL MONTE BLVD

RESERVATIONRD

CABRILLO
HW
Y

CLARK CT

WILSON CT

KISKA CT
EDDE
C T
COSKY
D R
Marina
Municipal
Airport
Fort Ord
Dunes
State Park
Abrams
Park
Vince
DiMaggio
Park
Preston
Park
Glorya Jean
Tate Park
Marina
State
Beach
Locke
Paddon
Park
Monterey County Active Transportation Plan
Data provided by
Monterey County TAMC.

T errain data by ESRI, NOAA.

Map produced October 2017
by Alta Planning + Design.

MONTEREY
COUNTY

SAN BENITO
COUNTY
FRESNO
COUNTY
KINGS
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY

SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY

SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY
Points of Interest
K-12 School
! College/University
! City Hall
! Transit Center
! Public Library
Land Use
Park/Open Space
Cal State Monterey Bay
Commercial Area
City Boundary
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Proposed Pedestrian
Improvements
Intersection
Proposed Bikeway Improvements
Class I Shared Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Class IV Protected Bike Lane
Fort Ord Rec Trail and Greenway
Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail
Uphill bikeway
(Slope > 4%)

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY Map Area
0 ½ 1
MILES
¯
Marina
69 Excerpt from the 2010 City of Marina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, Pages 6-5 though 6-7 70 City of Marina
Pe
destrian and
Bicycle Master Plan
Chapter 6.0 –
Implementation
Plan
City of Marina
Page | 6-4
Table 6-1 Central Marina Network Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects CIP
Project
Number
Project
Type Project Location and Description
Length of
Construction
(feet)
Length of
striping
(feet)
High Priority Projects
R 10 Sidewalks Abdy Way - fill gap on southeast side just south of Healy Ave 300
R 10 Sidewalks Abdy Way - fill gap on northwest side just east of Cardoza 650
R 12 Sidewalks Healy Ave - north side from Abdy Way to Paul Davis Dr 530
R 12 Sidewalks Healy Ave - south side from Abdy Way to
Marina Dr 770
R 13 Sidewalks Lake Dr - fill gaps on east side from Messinger Dr to Hilo Ave 540
R 13 Sidewalks Lake Dr - north side from Hilo Dr to
Reservation Rd 110
R 15 Sidewalks Marina Dr - west side from Legion Way to Healy Ave 320
R 18 Sidewalks Paddon Place - fill gaps on south side between Lake Dr and Marina Dr 400
R 20 Sidewalks Palm Ave - fill gaps (both sides) from Lake Dr to Del Monte Blvd 540
R 21 Sidewalks Palm Ave - north side from Elm to Sunset 600 R 22 Sidewalks Redwood Dr - west side from Hillcrest to Carmel 550
R 23 Sidewalks Reindollar Ave - fill gaps on both sides from Vera Lane to Vaughan Ave 700
R 23 Sidewalks
Reindollar Ave - gap on north side west of
Redwood; Redwood Dr - gap on west side
north of Reindollar
650
R 23 Sidewalks Reindollar Ave - gap on south side between Del Monte Blvd and Sunset Ave 200
R 25 Sidewalks Cardoza Ave - east side from Abdy Way to Ora Court 200
R 29 Sidewalks Del Monte Blvd - fill gap on east side between Reservation Rd and Beach Rd 1750
R 32 Sidewalks Beach Rd - fill gap on south side at Michael Dr 300 R 38 Sidewalks Del Monte Blvd - fill gap on east side between Palm Ave and Mortimer Lane 450
R 42 Sidewalks Seacrest Ave - fill gap on east side just north of Carmel Ave 180
R 55, 31 Sidewalks Reservation Rd - fill gap on south side from Cardoza to Beach Rd 220
R 56 Sidewalks Salinas Ave - fill gaps on west side from Carmel Ave to Reservation Rd 680
R 60 Sidewalks Crescent Ave - fill gaps on west side from Carmel Ave to Reservation Rd 450
Medium Priority Projects
- Sidewalks Marina Dr - fill gaps on west side between
Palm Ave and Paddon Place 700
- Sidewalks Abdy Way from Cardoza Ave to Drew Street,
fill gap on west side approaching Drew 100
- Sidewalks California Ave from Third Ave to Reindollar Ave – meandering sidewalks n/a
71 City of Marina
Pe
destrian and
Bicycle Master Plan
Chapter 6.0 –
Implementation
Plan
City of Marina
Page | 6-5
Table 6-1 Central Marina Network Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects CIP
Project
Number
Project
Type Project Location and Description
Length of
Construction
(feet)
Length of
striping
(feet)
- Sidewalks Drew St from Abdy Way to Lakewood Dr –
need sidewalks both sides n/a
- Sidewalk Zanetta Dr from Reindollar to Hillcrest Ave – need sidewalk on east side n/a
- Crosswalks
Restripe 4 bent crosswalks: N side of Del
Monte @ Palm; N and E sides of Del Monte @
Reservation; S side of Reservation and
Crescent
800
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - fill small gap on north side
between Crescent and Vaughan 100
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - south side from Del Monte Blvd to Sunset Ave 860
- Sidewalks California Ave - west side from Reservation Rd to Carmel Ave 1530
- Sidewalks Reservation Rd - fill gaps on north side from Ocean Terrace to Lynscott 2200
- Sidewalks Crescent Ave - east side from Carmel to
Reservation 1520
- Restriping Remove one of two right turn lanes from Del Monte Blvd to Reservation Rd 800
- Sidewalks Beach Rd - build sidewalks on both sides
across Railroad tracks at Del Monte Blvd 200
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - fill gaps on north side from
Seacrest to Crescent 450
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - fill gaps on south side from
Seacrest to Crescent 600
- Sidewalks California Ave - east side from Tamara Court to the dead end 120
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - gaps on north side from Del
Monte Blvd to just east of Sunset 480
- Sidewalks Beach Rd and Reservation Rd - fill gap on
north side between Cardoza and Marina Dr 800
- Sidewalks Carmel Ave - north side from Bayer St to
Salinas Ave 310
- Sidewalks Reindollar Ave - fill gap on north side between California Ave and Eddy Circle 450
- Sidewalks Abdy Way - fill gap on west side north of Healy Ave 200
- Sidewalks 2 nd Avenue south of Imjin Parkway to CSUMB - - Sidewalks From Imjin Pkwy north to Reindollar Ave -
72 City of Marina
Pe
destrian and
Bicycle Master Plan
Chapter 6.0 –
Implementation
Plan
City of Marina
Page | 6-6
Table 6-2 Central Marina Network Bicycling Infrastructure Projects CIP
Project
Number
Project
Type Project Location and Description
Length of
Construction
(feet)
Length of
striping
(feet)
High Priority Projects
R 01 Bike Lanes Crescent Ave from Reservation Rd to Costa Del Mar 2120
R 01 Bike Lanes Crescent Ave from Costa Del Mar to the
north end 480
R 09 Bike Lanes De Forest Rd from Reservation Rd to Beach Rd 2800
R 13 Bike Lanes Lake Dr from Palm Ave to Lake Court 1220 R 13 Bike Lanes Lake Dr from Palm Ave to Reservation Rd 2150 R 14 Bike Lanes Lake Court from Lake Dr to the dead end 1000 R 20-21 Bike Lanes Palm Ave from Lake Dr to Sunset Ave 100 1870 R 23A Bike Lanes Carmel Ave from Sunset Ave to Salinas Ave 6740 R 26 Bike Lanes Cardoza Ave Reservation Rd to Lakewood
Dr 2200
R 27, 26 Bike Lanes Cardoza Ave from Lakewood Dr to the dead end 410
R 28 Bike Lanes Del Monte Blvd from Beach Rd to Marina
Greens Dr 2670
R 29 Bike Lanes
Road Diet
Del Monte Blvd from Reservation Rd to
Beach Rd 2330
R 30 Bike Lanes Bostick Ave from Carmel Ave to Reindollar Ave 1240
R 32 Bike Lanes Beach Rd from Reservation Rd to Del Monte Blvd 100 1430
R 32 Bike Lanes Beach Rd from Del Monte Blvd to De Forest Rd 2770
R 38 Bike Lanes Del Monte Blvd from Reindollar Ave to
Reservation Rd 3050
R 42 Bike Lanes Seacrest Ave from Carmel Ave to
Reservation Rd 1510
R 45 Bike Lanes Sunset Ave from Carmel Ave to Reindollar Ave 1500
Medium Priority Projects
- Bike Lanes De Forest Road to Crescent Avenue south of Armstrong Ranch 1880
- Bike Lanes Cardoza Avenue and Cosky Drive south of
Armstrong Ranch 1800
- Bike Lanes Lake Court to Del Monte Boulevard 890
- Bike Lanes Dunes Drive from Beach Road north to the
dead end 1330
- Signs Ensure there are no conflicting signs or
signals - -
- Bike Path
Along south edge of Central Marina from Del
Monte Blvd to Marina High School (Patton
Pkwy extension) including Talcott Gate
-
- Bike Lanes Bayer Street from Reservation Rd to Carmel Ave 1500
- Bike Lanes Reservation Rd from Beach Rd to Dunes Dr 1800 - Bike Path Del Monte Blvd - East side from Reindollar to southern edge of Central Marina 800
- Bike Lanes Hillcrest Ave from City Hall to Redwood Dr 4440 73 City of Marina
Pedestrian and
Bicycle Master Plan
Chapter 6.0 –
Implementation
Plan

City of Marina
Page | 6-7
Table 6-2 Central Marina Network Bicycling Infrastructure Projects CIP
Project
Number
Project
Type Project Location and Description
Length of
Construction
(feet)
Length of
striping
(feet)
- Bike Path Through park near Reservation Rd from Del
Monte Blvd to Seaside Circle 2000
- Bike Path
Formalize the use trail from the corner of
Paddon Place and Marina Dr to trail along
Del Monte Blvd
100
- Bike Lanes Fill in gaps along California Avenue -
- Bike Path Imjin Pkwy from 2nd Ave to Hwy 1
Interchange -
- Bike Lanes From Imjin Pkwy north to Reindollar Ave - - Bike Lanes
Connecting the 2nd Ave northern extension
and the westernmost portion of the Cypress
Knolls Specific Plan area
-
- Bike Lanes 3rd Ave from Imjin Pkwy to the Cypress
Knolls Specific Plan area -
- Bike Lanes 4th Ave from Imjin Pkwy to the Cypress
Knolls Specific Plan area -
- Bike Lanes 5th Ave south of California Ave/Imjin
Pkwy/12th St Intersection to 8th Street Cutoff -
- Bike Lanes 8th St Cutoff from 2nd Ave to the 5th Ave

74 City of Marina 2021 Resurfacing Project Locations
75 Slurry Seal Schedule
Revised 10/21/2021

RUWAP/COM STREETS
Marina Coast Water District
Bond Blacktop, Inc.

DATE STREET LIMITS TC
28-Oct Reservation Road Blanco Rd Intersection TYPE 3 PHASE 1A/1B Thurs Research Dr East Research Dr East TYPE 3 CLOSE
Third Avenue Twelfth St to Rendova Rd FLAG
SLURRY Tallmon Street Crescent Ave to Sirena Del Mar Rd CLOSE Cove Way Dolphin Cir to End CLOSE
Sandpiper Way Dolphin Cir to End CLOSE
29-Oct Reservation Road Blanco Rd Intersection TYPE 3 PHASE 2 Fri Third Avenue Twelfth St to Rendova Rd FLAG
Concord Court Eddy St to End CLOSE
SLURRY Lake Court Hwy 1 to End CLOSE
Tallmon Street Crescent Ave to Sirena Del Mar Rd CLOSE
Vista Del Camino Circle 171' N/O George Wy to South End CLOSE Michael Drive 141' N/O Harben Cir to Sells Ct CLOSE
Healy Avenue Abdy Wy to Paul Davis Dr CLOSE
76 "A Message from the Marina Traffic Unit" 2015
77 A message from the Marina Traffic Unit
In an effort to keep our community informed, we would like to share some data with you. We hope that after reading this message that each and every one of us will Pledge to drive safely and responsibly. It is our goal to make our roadways safer for our own families and our entire community.

I
n 2014, there were 317 traffic collisions in the City of Marina. This is the highest amount of traffic collisions in the past five years and a 17% increase over 2013. Of those collisions, 42 involved injuries, which is a 5% increase over 2013. Nearly 80% of those collisions occurred in our City’s three main arteries/commuter routes; Imjin Parkway having the most amount of traffic collisions.

C
urrently the speed limit on Imjin Parkway is 45 MPH. While most of the citations that have been issued have been for 58 MPH and above, we have also issued citations for driver’s traveling in excess of 80 MPH. With the new improvements to Imjin Parkway and the pedestrian/bicycle lanes being added in both directions, drivers operating their vehicles in a safe manner is of the highest importance.

I
n 2014 there were 82 traffic collisions on Imjin Parkway and 733 citations were issued. The top five violations were for:
o Speeding
o Red light
o Suspended or unlicensed drivers
o Distracted driving
o And expired registration
Of
the 82 traffic collisions on Imjin Parkway in 2014 speeding was determined to be the Primary Collision Factor 52% of the time.

In recent years it has been difficult for police to consistently enforce speeding violations on Imjin Parkway. Prior to 2014, our only method of speed enforcement was by use of the Radar device. The Radar device although effective under certain traffic conditions, has its limitations.

In simple terms, the Radar device measures the speed of objects by detecting a change in frequency of the returned radar signal after being pointed at a moving object. The majority of our traffic collisions on Imjin Parkway occur in heavy traffic conditions. With that being said, in heavy traffic conditions it is often difficult to identify and isolate a speeding vehicle using the Radar Device.

As of February of this year, the Marina Traffic Unit is now equipped with new LIDAR devices.

Unlike the Radar device, the Lidar uses an eye safe laser which is pointed directly at a moving 78 vehicle. Within seconds, the speed and distance of the vehicle is recorded. Because the Lidar device uses a laser, if 5 vehicles were approaching, the officer using the Lidar device is able to determine the speed of each vehicle, one at a time.

In 2014 from February 1st to the 24th, 20 speeding tickets were issued on Imjin Parkway using Radar.

In 2015 from February 1st to the 24th,
140 speeding tickets were issued on Imjin Parkway using Lidar. As you can see the Lidar device is very effective.

We want our community to know that it is not and has never been the goal of the Marina Police Department
to write as many tickets as possible. One of our primary goals is to maintain and improve our community’s quality of life by making our roadways safe. Unfortunately, enforcement action plays a significant role in getting that accomplished. However, we recognize that this cannot be accomplished by enforcement only.

Recently we have deployed our traffic sign board on Imjin Parkway, reminding drivers of the speed limit in hopes of reducing the speeding violations that we are encountering. In January of this year, the Marina Police Department submitted a grant application to OTS (California Office of Traffic Safety).

In the grant application we requested funding for:
 Police equipment
 Digital radar feedback signs for Imjin Parkway (Like the signs on Blanco Rd)  Digital radar feedback signs for our schools
 Two motorcycles
 A second
traffic speed trailer

We will keep you informed of the grant status.

If you have any traffic concerns, questions, or would like to request non-emergency enforcement, please call the traffic unit at 884-0141. If you have traffic concerns that you feel require immediate police assistance please call Monterey County Communications (dispatch) at 384- 7575. For all emergencies
call 9-1-1.

Take the Pledge to drive safely and responsibly.

Sergeant Eddie Anderson
Traffic Unit Supervisor

Marina Police Department
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina Ca. 93933
Business (831) 883-0141
Email:
[email protected]
City Website: www.ci.marina.ca.us
Agency Website: www.marinapolice.com
79 Excerpt from the Caltrans SHSP Website
80 /0 /1 /2 /i255 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /7 /5 /i255 /12 /13 /12 /14 /i255 /1 /5 /15 /i255 /7 /16 /2 /11 /17 /7 /8 /7 /2 /16 /i255 /18 /19 /i255 /21 /22 /23 /24 /24 /25 /26 /27 /25 /i255 /23 /28 /25 /23 /29 /i255 /17 /1 /5 /17 /i255 /17 /10 /5 /30 /7 /31 /i255 /15 /5 /8 /2 /17 /32 /i255 /2 /30 /9 /10 /17 /15 /i255 /15 /1 /9 /33 /6 /16 /i255 /8 /9 /31 /33 /15 /i255 /9 /11 /34 /i255 /0 /1 /2 /15 /2 /31 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /5 /10 /2 /5 /15 /i255 /36 /2 /10 /2 /i255 /7 /16 /2 /11 /17 /7 /8 /7 /2 /16 /i255 /17 /1 /10 /9 /33 /35 /1 /i255 /1 /7 /15 /17 /9 /10 /7 /31 /5 /6 /i255 /16 /5 /17 /5 /i255 /2 /37 /5 /6 /33 /5 /17 /7 /9 /11 /15 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /8 /2 /2 /16 /38 /5 /31 /39 /i255 /8 /10 /9/40/i255/17 /10 /5 /30 /7 /31 /i255 /15 /5 /8 /2 /17 /32 /15 /17 /5 /39 /2 /1 /9 /6 /16 /2 /10 /15 /i255 /5 /31 /10 /9 /15 /15 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /15 /17 /5 /17 /2 /34 /i255 /12 /7 /41 /i255 /9 /8 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /31 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /5 /10 /2 /5 /15 /i255 /1 /5 /37 /2 /i255 /38 /2 /2 /11 /i255 /7 /16 /2 /11 /17 /7 /8 /7 /2 /16 /i255 /5 /15 /i255 /1 /7 /35 /1 /i255 /42 /10 /7 /9 /10 /7 /17 /7 /2 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /i255 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /7 /5 /i255 /38 /2 /31 /5 /33 /15 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /32 /i255 /10 /2 /42 /10 /2 /15 /2 /11 /17 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /35 /10 /2 /5 /17 /2 /15 /17 /i255 /9 /42 /42 /9 /10 /17 /33 /11 /7 /17 /32 /i255 /17 /9 /i255 /10 /2 /16 /33 /31 /2 /i255 /8 /5 /17 /5 /6 /7 /17 /7 /2 /15 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /15 /2 /10 /7 /9 /33 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /43 /33 /10 /7 /2 /15 /i255 /5 /31 /10 /9 /15 /15 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /15 /17 /5 /17 /2 /44 /45 /22 /23 /24 /24 /25 /26 /27 /25
/46 /28 /25 /23
/47 /25 /28 /21 /25 /26 /48
/49 /50
/51 /23 /48 /23 /24 /52 /48 /52 /25 /29 /i255
/53 /54 /55 /55 /56 /57
/54 /55 /18 /58 /59
/47 /25 /28 /21 /25 /26 /48
/49 /50
/60 /25 /28 /52 /49 /61 /29
/62 /26 /63 /61 /28 /52 /25 /29 /i255
/53 /54 /55 /55 /56 /57
/54 /55 /18 /58 /59
/64 /25 /29 /21 /28 /52 /65 /48 /52 /49 /26
/66 /35 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /67 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10/15/68 /69/70/68 /68 /70 /0 /1 /2 /i255 /46 /27 /52 /26 /27 /i255/64 /28 /52 /71 /25 /28 /29 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /15 /17 /5 /11 /31 /2 /15 /36 /1 /2 /10 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /16 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10 /i255 /9 /8 /i255 /5 /i255/40/9/17 /9 /10 /i255 /37 /2 /1 /7 /31 /6 /2 /i255 /7 /15 /i255 /72 /73 /i255 /32 /2 /5 /10 /15 /i255 /9 /10 /i255 /9 /6 /16 /2 /10 /34 /0 /1 /2 /i255 /42 /10 /2 /37 /7 /9 /33 /15 /i255 /12 /13 /12 /14 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /16 /i255 /5 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /36 /7 /17 /1 /i255 /5 /6 /6 /5 /35 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /10 /9 /5 /16 /i255 /33 /15 /2 /10 /15 /74 /i255 /1 /9 /36 /2 /37 /2 /10 /75 /i255 /17 /1 /7 /15 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /5 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /1 /5 /15 /i255 /38 /2 /2 /11 /11 /5 /10 /10 /9 /36 /2 /16 /i255 /16 /9 /36 /11 /i255 /17 /9 /i255 /15 /42 /2 /31 /7 /8 /7 /31 /5 /6 /6 /32 /i255 /6 /9 /9 /39 /i255 /5 /17 /i255 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /15 /7 /11 /37 /9 /6 /37 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /5 /35 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /16 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10 /15 /34 /76 /7 /31 /32 /31 /6 /7 /15 /17 /15 /i255
/77 /13 /7 /35 /1 /i255 /14 /10 /7 /9 /10 /7 /17 /32 /78/69/70/79 /70 /0 /1 /2 /i255 /80 /52 /21 /81 /21 /24 /52 /29 /48 /29 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /15 /17 /5 /11 /31 /2 /15 /i255 /36 /1 /2 /10 /2 /5 /i255/40/9/17 /9 /10 /i255 /37 /2 /1 /7 /31 /6 /2 /i255 /7 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /37 /9 /6 /37 /2 /16 /i255 /7 /11 /i255 /5 /i255 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /i255 /36 /7 /17 /1 /i255 /5 /i255 /38 /7 /31 /32 /31 /6 /7 /15 /17 /34 /4 /9/40/40/2/10 /31 /7 /5 /6
/82 /2 /1 /7 /31 /6 /2 /15/68 /83/70/72 /70
/0 /1 /2 /i255 /45 /49/84/84/25/28 /21 /52 /23 /24 /i255 /85 /25 /22 /52 /21 /24 /25 /29 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /7 /11 /15 /17 /5 /11 /31 /2 /15 /i255 /36 /1 /2 /10 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /i255 /7 /11 /37 /9 /6 /37 /2 /15 /i255 /5 /i255 /17 /10 /33 /31 /39 /75 /i255 /17 /10 /33 /31 /39 /17 /10 /5 /31 /17 /9 /10 /75 /i255 /15 /31 /1 /9 /9 /6 /i255 /38 /33 /15 /i255 /9 /10 /i255 /9 /17 /1 /2 /10 /i255 /38 /33 /15 /34 /67 /7 /15 /17 /10 /5 /31 /17 /2 /16
/67 /10 /7 /37 /7 /11 /35 /i255/73/70/73 /70
/0 /1 /2 /i255 /64 /52 /29 /48 /28 /23 /21 /48 /25 /86 /i255 /64 /28 /52 /71 /52 /26 /27 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /7 /11 /15 /17 /5 /11 /31 /2 /15 /i255 /36 /1 /2 /10 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /16 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10 /i255 /9 /8 /i255 /5 /i255/40/9/17 /9 /10 /i255 /37 /2 /1 /7 /31 /6 /2 /i255 /36 /5 /15 /i255 /11 /9 /17 /42 /5 /32 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /5 /17 /17 /2 /11 /17 /7 /9 /11 /i255 /9 /10 /i255 /33 /15 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /5 /11 /i255 /2 /6 /2 /31 /17 /10 /9 /11 /7 /31 /i255 /16 /2 /37 /7 /31 /2 /34 /67 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10
/87 /7 /31 /2 /11 /15 /7 /11 /35/88 /73/70/89
/0 /1 /2 /i255 /64 /28 /52 /71 /25 /28 /i255 /90 /52 /21 /25 /26 /29 /52 /26 /27 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /15 /17 /5 /11 /31 /2 /15 /36 /1 /2 /10 /2 /i255 /5 /11 /i255 /7 /11 /37 /9 /6 /37 /2 /16 /i255 /16 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10 /i255 /7 /15 /i255 /33 /11 /6 /7 /31 /2 /11 /15 /2 /16 /i255 /9 /10 /i255 /16 /9 /2 /15 /i255 /11 /9 /17 /i255 /31 /5 /10 /10 /32 /5 /i255 /37 /5 /6 /7 /16 /i255 /6 /7 /31 /2 /11 /15 /2 /i255 /8 /9 /10 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /37 /2 /1 /7 /31 /6 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /5 /17 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /32 /i255 /5 /10 /2 /i255 /9 /42 /2 /10 /5 /17 /7 /11 /35 /34 /0 /1 /7 /15 /i255 /7 /11 /8 /9 /10/40/5/17 /7 /9 /11 /i255 /9 /11 /i255 /16 /10 /7 /37 /2 /10 /i255 /6 /7 /31 /2 /11 /15 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /7 /15 /i255 /9 /11 /6 /32 /i255 /31 /33 /10 /10 /2 /11 /17 /6 /32 /5 /37 /5 /7 /6 /5 /38 /6 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /10 /9 /33 /35 /1 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /91 /66 /92 /12 /i255 /16 /5 /17 /5 /74 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /10 /2 /8 /9 /10 /2 /75 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /16 /5 /17 /5 /38 /2 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /10 /2 /42 /9 /10 /17 /2 /16 /i255 /8 /9 /10 /i255 /17 /1 /7 /15 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /9 /11 /6 /32 /i255 /42 /2 /10 /17 /5 /7 /11 /15 /i255 /17 /9 /8 /5 /17 /5 /6 /7 /17 /7 /2 /15 /34
/93/40/2/10 /35 /2 /11 /31 /32
/92 /2 /15 /42 /9 /11 /15 /2/89 /89
/0 /1 /2/i255 /94/84/25/28 /27 /25 /26 /21 /81 /i255 /95 /25 /29 /65 /49 /26 /29 /25 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /8 /9 /31 /33 /15 /2 /15 /i255 /9 /11 /42 /9 /15 /17 /89 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /i255 /2 /30 /9 /10 /17 /15 /i255 /17 /9 /i255 /10 /2 /16 /33 /31 /2 /i255 /8 /5 /17 /5 /6 /7 /17 /7 /2 /15 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /15 /2 /10 /7 /9 /33 /15 /7 /11 /43/33 /10 /7 /2 /15 /34
/93/40/2/10 /35 /7 /11 /35
/0 /2 /31 /1 /11 /9 /6 /9 /35 /7 /2 /15/89/89
/0 /1 /2 /i255 /94/84/25/28 /27 /52 /26 /27 /i255 /96 /25 /21 /22 /26 /49 /24 /49 /27 /52 /25 /29 /i255 /4 /1 /5 /6 /6 /2 /11 /35 /2 /i255 /66 /10 /2 /5 /i255 /8 /9 /31 /33 /15 /2 /15 /i255 /9 /11 /33 /15 /2 /i255 /9 /8 /i255 /17 /2 /31 /1 /11 /9 /6 /9 /35 /32 /i255 /17 /9 /i255 /42 /10 /2 /37/2 /11 /17 /75 /i255 /7 /16 /2 /11 /17 /7 /8 /32 /75 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /10 /2 /15 /42 /9 /11 /16 /i255 /17 /9 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /15 /34 /i255 /97 /17 /i255 /7 /11 /31 /6 /33 /16 /2 /15 /i255 /2 /41 /42 /6 /9 /10 /7 /11 /35 /i255 /17 /2 /31 /1 /11 /9 /6 /9 /35 /32 /5 /16 /37 /5 /11 /31 /2/40/2/11 /17 /15 /i255 /17 /1 /5 /17 /i255 /5 /10 /2 /i255 /11 /2 /36 /i255 /9 /10 /i255/33 /11 /16 /2 /10 /33 /17 /7 /6 /7 /98 /2 /16 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /17 /1 /5 /17 /31 /5 /11 /i255 /42 /9 /17 /2 /11 /17 /7 /5 /6 /6 /32 /i255 /10 /2 /16 /33 /31 /2 /i255 /17 /1 /2 /i255 /8 /10 /2 /99 /33 /2 /11 /31 /32 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /15 /2 /37 /2 /10 /7 /17 /32 /i255 /9 /8 /31 /9 /6 /6 /7 /15 /7 /9 /11 /15 /34
/87 /5 /11 /2 /i255 /67 /2 /42 /5 /10 /17 /33 /10 /2 /15 /97/40/42/5 /7 /10 /2 /16 /i255 /67 /10 /7 /37 /7 /11 /35 /12 /42 /2 /2 /16 /i255 /100 /5 /11 /5 /35 /2/40/2/11 /17 /i255 /101 /i255 /66 /35 /35 /10 /2 /15 /15 /7 /37 /2 /i255 /67 /10 /7 /37 /7 /11 /35 /14 /2 /16 /2 /15 /17 /10 /7 /5 /11 /15 /i255 /5 /11 /16 /i255 /76 /7 /31 /32 /31 /6 /7 /15 /17 /15 /97 /11 /17 /2 /10 /15 /2 /31 /17 /7 /9 /11 /15
81 /0/1/2/3 /4 /5 /6 /7
/8 /5 /4 /9 /4 /10 /11 /i255
/13 /14 /4 /11 /15 /i255 /16 /5 /4 /17 /5 /4 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22/23/24 /25 /23
/26 /15 /6 /i255 /27/28/29/30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /i255 /36 /32 /31 /37 /31 /38 /39 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /10 /19 /i255 /6 /9 /4 /7 /6 /10 /43 /6 /i255 /17 /47 /i255 /7 /5 /44 /11 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /3 /41 /43 /17 /15 /17 /41 /i255 /44 /45 /6 /i255 /48 /19 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5 /i255 /4 /45 /i255 /2 /5 /6 /45 /6 /10 /18 /49 /i255 /6 /9 /6 /10 /i255 /4 /47 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5 /i255 /46 /3 /45 /i255 /10 /17 /18 /i255 /17 /9 /6 /5 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /41 /6 /11 /3 /41 /i255 /41 /4/1/4/18 /50 /i255 /26 /15 /6 /i255 /2 /5 /6 /9 /4 /17 /44 /45 /i255 /51 /14 /51 /16 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /7 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /42 /41 /43 /17 /15 /17 /41 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /8 /5 /44 /11 /i255 /0/1/2/3 /4 /5/1/6/10 /18 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /18 /15 /3 /18 /i255 /3 /7 /7 /5 /6 /45 /45 /6 /7 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /i255/1/17/18 /17 /5 /4 /45 /18 /49 /i255 /2 /6 /7 /6 /45 /18 /5 /4 /3 /10 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /48 /4 /43 /19 /43 /41 /4 /45 /18 /i255 /15 /3 /7 /48 /6 /6 /10 /i255 /44 /45 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /3 /41 /43 /17 /15 /17 /41 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /52 /17 /5 /i255 /7 /5 /44 /11 /45 /53 /i255 /18 /15 /4 /45 /i255 /51 /14 /51 /16 /54 /45 /i255 /7 /6 /47 /4 /10 /4 /18 /4 /17 /10 /15 /3 /45 /i255 /48 /6 /6 /10 /i255 /44 /2 /7 /3 /18 /6 /7 /i255 /18 /17 /i255 /17 /10 /41 /19 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /46 /4 /18 /15 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5 /45 /18 /15 /3 /18 /i255 /15 /3 /7 /i255 /48 /6 /6 /10 /i255 /44 /45 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /3 /41 /43 /17 /15 /17 /41 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /52 /17 /5 /i255 /7 /5 /44 /11 /45 /50 /0 /10 /18 /6 /5 /45 /6 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255
/13 /14 /4 /11 /15 /i255 /16 /5 /4 /17 /5 /4 /18 /19 /20/24 /22/23/24 /21 /23 /26 /15 /6 /i255 /27 /38 /55 /33 /32 /56 /33 /57 /55 /31 /58 /38 /56 /i255 /40/15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /4 /7 /6 /10 /18 /4 /47 /4 /6 /7 /i255 /48 /19 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /5 /6 /45 /2 /17 /10 /7 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /17 /59 /4 /43 /6 /5 /i255 /3 /45 /i255 /17 /43 /43 /44 /5 /5 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /3 /18 /i255 /3 /10 /4 /10 /18 /6 /5 /45 /6 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /4 /10 /9 /17 /41 /9 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /3 /i255 /18 /5 /3 /4 /10 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /5 /3 /4 /41 /i255 /9 /6 /15 /4 /43 /41 /6 /50 /i255 /26 /15 /6 /2 /5 /6 /9 /4 /17 /44 /45 /i255 /51 /14 /51 /16 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /7 /i255 /3 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /18 /15 /3 /18 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /7 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17/10 /45 /i255 /3 /18 /i255 /4 /10 /18 /6 /5 /45 /6 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10 /45 /49 /i255 /4 /10 /18 /6 /5 /43 /15 /3 /10 /11 /6 /45 /49 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /17 /18 /15 /6 /5 /5 /17 /3 /7 /46 /3 /19 /i255 /3 /43 /43 /6 /45 /45 /53 /i255 /18 /15 /4 /45 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /17 /10 /41 /19 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /4 /10 /18 /6 /5 /45 /6 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10 /45 /50 /i255 /i255 /60 /3 /10 /6
/8 /6 /2 /3 /5 /18 /44 /5 /6 /45 /i255
/13 /14 /4 /11 /15 /i255 /16 /5 /4 /17 /5 /4 /18 /19 /20 /21 /61/23/21 /25 /23
/26 /15 /6 /i255 /62 /30 /38 /33 /i255 /36 /33 /29 /30 /32 /55 /63 /32 /33 /56 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /15 /6 /3 /7 /64 /17 /10 /49 /15 /4 /18 /i255 /17 /48 /65 /6 /43 /18 /49 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /17 /9 /6 /5 /18 /44 /5 /10 /6 /7 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /50 /i255 /26 /15 /4 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /4 /10 /45 /18 /3 /10 /43 /6 /45 /i255 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /i255 /9 /6 /15 /4 /43 /41 /6 /i255 /5 /44 /10 /45 /i255 /17 /59 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /5 /17 /3 /7 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /43 /5 /17 /45 /45 /6 /45 /4 /10/18 /17 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /17 /2 /2 /17 /45 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /41 /3 /10 /6 /i255 /2 /5 /4 /17 /5 /i255 /18 /17 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /50 /i255 /26 /15 /6 /2 /5 /6 /9 /4 /17 /44 /45 /i255 /51 /14 /51 /16 /i255 /15 /3 /7 /i255 /3 /i255 /66 /17 /3 /7 /46 /3 /19 /i255 /8 /6 /2 /3 /5 /18 /44 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /14 /6 /3 /7 /64 /67 /10 /40 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /53 /i255 /18 /15 /4 /45 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /15 /3 /45 /i255 /48 /6 /6 /10 /6 /68 /2 /3 /10 /7 /6 /7 /i255 /18 /17 /i255 /3 /41 /45 /17 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /i255 /15 /4 /18 /i255 /17 /48 /65 /6 /43 /18 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /17 /9 /6 /5 /18 /44 /5 /10 /6 /7 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /50
/69 /17 /18 /17 /5 /43 /19 /43 /41 /4 /45 /18/45/70 /25/23/70 /71/23/i255 /26 /15 /6 /i255/72/58/55 /58 /32 /57 /73 /57 /74 /31 /56 /55 /56 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /45 /18 /3 /10 /43 /6 /45 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /i255/1/17/18 /17 /5 /43 /19 /43 /41 /6 /i255 /17 /5 /i255/1/17/2 /6 /7 /i255 /4 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /9 /17 /41 /9 /6 /7 /i255 /4 /10 /i255 /3 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /50 /67 /43 /43 /44 /2 /3 /10 /18
/16 /5 /17 /18 /6 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10/i255 /70 /71/23/70 /70 /23 /26 /15 /6 /i255 /75 /57 /57 /63 /29 /30 /38 /55 /i255 /76 /32 /58 /55 /33 /57 /55 /31 /58 /38 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /9 /17 /41 /9 /4 /10 /11 /i255/1/4/45 /44 /45 /6 /49 /i255 /10 /17 /10 /64 /44 /45 /6 /49 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /41 /3 /43 /77 /i255 /17 /47 /i255 /9 /6 /15 /4 /43 /41 /6 /45 /3 /47 /6 /18 /19 /i255 /6 /78 /44 /4 /2/1/6/10 /18 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /41 /3 /2 /i255 /48 /6 /41 /18 /45 /49 /i255 /45 /15 /17 /44 /41 /7 /6 /5 /15/3 /5 /10 /6 /45 /45 /6 /45 /49 /i255 /2 /3 /45 /45 /4 /9 /6 /i255 /5 /6 /45 /18 /5 /3 /4 /10 /18 /45 /49 /i255 /17 /5 /i255 /43 /15 /4 /41 /7 /i255 /5 /6 /45 /18 /5 /3 /4 /10 /18 /45 /50 /16 /6 /7 /6 /45 /18 /5 /4 /3 /10 /45 /i255
/13 /14 /4 /11 /15 /i255 /16 /5 /4 /17 /5 /4 /18 /19 /20/24 /79/23/70 /25 /23 /26 /15 /6 /i255 /76 /33 /34 /33 /56 /55 /32 /31 /30 /38 /56 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /45 /18 /3 /10 /43 /6 /45 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /i255/1/17/18 /17 /5 /i255 /9 /6 /15 /4 /43 /41 /6 /i255 /4 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /9 /17 /41 /9 /6 /7 /i255 /4 /10 /i255 /3 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /i255 /46 /4 /18 /15 /i255 /3 /2 /6 /7 /6 /45 /18 /5 /4 /3 /10 /50
/51 /2 /6 /6 /7
/69/3 /10 /3 /11 /6/1/6/10 /18 /52 /i255
/42 /11 /11 /5 /6 /45 /45 /4 /9 /6
/8 /5 /4 /9 /4 /10 /11 /i255
/13 /14 /4 /11 /15 /i255 /16 /5 /4 /17 /5 /4 /18 /19 /20 /79 /79/23/i255
/79/21 /23
/26 /15 /6 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /45 /6 /9 /6 /5 /3 /41 /i255 /48 /6 /15 /3 /9 /4 /17 /5 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /4/10 /11 /7 /5 /4 /9 /4 /10 /11 /i255 /18 /17 /17 /i255 /47 /3 /45 /18 /49 /i255 /18 /3 /4 /41 /11 /3 /18 /4 /10 /11 /49 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /17 /18 /15 /6 /5 /i255 /5 /6 /43 /77 /41 /6 /45 /45 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /4 /10 /11 /1/3/10 /6 /44 /9 /6 /5 /45 /i255 /3 /45 /i255 /7 /6 /18 /6 /5/1/4/10 /6 /7 /i255 /48 /19 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /17 /59 /4 /43 /6 /5 /i255 /17 /10 /i255 /45 /43 /6 /10 /6 /50 /i255 /26 /15 /6 /7 /3 /18 /3 /i255 /7 /6 /47 /4 /10 /4 /18 /4 /17 /10 /i255 /15 /3 /45 /i255 /48 /6 /6 /10 /i255 /6 /68 /2 /3 /10 /7 /6 /7 /i255 /47 /5 /17/1/i255/18 /15 /6 /i255 /2 /5 /6 /9 /4 /17 /44 /45 /51 /14 /51 /16 /i255 /18 /17 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /45 /i255 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5 /45 /i255 /5 /44 /10 /i255 /18 /5 /3 /59 /4 /43 /45 /4 /11 /10 /3 /41 /45 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /45 /4 /11 /10 /45 /49 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /3 /10 /19 /i255 /17 /47 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /48 /6 /47 /17 /5 /6 /1/6/10 /18 /4 /17 /10 /6 /7 /i255 /3 /18 /18 /5 /4 /48 /44 /18 /6 /45 /i255 /3 /5 /6 /i255 /2 /5 /6 /45 /6 /10 /18 /i255 /6 /9 /6 /10 /i255 /4 /47 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /19 /i255 /3 /5 /6 /i255 /10 /17 /18 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /2 /5 /4/1/3/5 /19 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /i255 /47 /3 /43 /18 /17 /5 /50 /80/17/5 /77 /i255 /81 /17 /10 /6/45/24 /23/70 /23
/26 /15 /6 /i255/82/58/32 /83 /i255 /84 /58 /38 /33 /56 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /45 /18 /3 /10 /43 /6 /45 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /43 /17 /41 /41 /4 /45 /4 /17 /10 /i255 /17 /43 /43 /44 /5 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /i255 /3 /i255 /46 /17 /5 /77 /i255 /85 /17 /10 /6 /i255 /47 /17 /5 /43 /17 /10 /45 /18 /5 /44 /43 /18 /4 /17 /10 /49 /i255/1/3/4 /10 /18 /6 /10 /3 /10 /43 /6 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /52 /17 /5 /i255 /5 /17 /3 /7 /46 /3 /19 /i255 /5 /6 /2 /3 /4 /5 /45 /50 /86 /17 /44 /10 /11 /i255 /8 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5/45/70 /79/23/70 /25 /23 /26 /15 /6/i255 /87 /58 /63 /38 /39 /i255 /36 /32 /31 /37 /33 /32 /56 /i255 /40 /15 /3 /41 /41 /6 /10 /11 /6 /i255 /42 /5 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /10 /43 /41 /44 /7 /6 /45 /i255 /4 /10 /45 /18 /3 /10 /43 /6 /45 /46 /15 /6 /5 /6 /i255 /17 /10 /6 /i255 /17 /5 /i255/1/17/5 /6 /i255 /17 /47 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255 /7 /5 /4 /9 /6 /5 /45 /i255 /17 /47 /i255 /18 /15 /6 /i255/1/17/18 /17 /5 /i255 /9 /6 /15 /4 /43 /41 /6 /45 /3 /5 /6 /i255 /48 /6 /18 /46 /6 /6 /10 /i255 /70 /25 /i255 /3 /10 /7 /i255 /24 /22 /i255 /19 /6 /3 /5 /45 /i255 /17 /41 /7 /50 /51 /14 /51 /16
82 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 Appendix

APPENDIX B

INTERSECTION NETWORK SCREENING RESULTS
83 ID
Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Locations
Signalized Intersections 8 32 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 1 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy 79 0 . 7 1 1 4 9 0038 6 8 77 6 1 010300 5 1 6 1 0 4 X 2 California Dr & Imjin Pkwy 65 0 . 5 2 1 5 9 0059 5 1 1 8 1 2 2 4 230501 2 8 2 1 6 6 X 3 Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd 53 0 . 2 9 9 8 0025 4 6 1 1 2 1 1 4 220011 1 5 4 1 7 9 X 4 Imjin Pkwy & Imjin Rd 46 0.15 274 015 1 2 2 8 04 2 9 370200 3 3 5 1 3 7 5 Del Monte Blvd & Reindollar Ave 38 ‐0 . 1 7 5 8 0004 3 4 76 2 1 040000 2 2 4 1 0 5 6 Imjin Rd & Reservation Rd 38 0 . 5 7 1 0 8 002 1 0 2 6 1 1 6 1 8 010020 2 5 2 1 0 3 7 Crescent Ave & Reservation Rd 38 0 . 0 3 8 2 0033 3 2 4 1 0 1 0 15132195 1 4 3 X 8D e l  Monte Blvd & Palm Ave 30 0.20 238 0158 1 6 53 1 3 020034 1 6 3 1 0 3 9 Seacrest Ave & Reservation Rd 25 ‐0 . 2 1 4 0 0003 2 2 4771004106410 X 10 De Forest Rd & Reservation Rd 21 ‐0 . 3 2 6 1 0024 1 5 6460002214133 X 11 2nd Ave & General Stilwell Dr 20 1 . 3 7 2 5 0001 1 9 4 1 0 30102003330 12 Preston Dr & Imjin Rd 15 ‐0 . 4 8 2 5 0002 1 3 21 1 0 100001 1 2 132 13 Vista Del Camino & Reservation Rd 11 ‐0 . 5 5 2 1 000293070100006242 14 California Ave & Reservation Rd 11 ‐0 . 5 7 1 4 4 011180441110006031 15 Reservation Rd & Cardoza Ave 9 ‐0 . 5 9 1 4 000180161000103010 16 Marina Square Eastern Driveway & Reservation Rd 9 ‐0 . 6 0 1 9 000273131010003110 17 Reservation Rd & Beach Rd 8 ‐0 . 6 3 1 3 2 010160510001101011 18 Mbest Dr & Res ervation  Rd 6 ‐0 . 7 0 1 6 001050231000001120 19 Hwy 1 SB On‐Ramp & Imjin Pkwy 3 ‐0 . 7 6 3000031110000001010 Unsignalized Intersections
20 Imjin Pkwy & W Abrams Dr 50 0 . 8 7 9 5 0025 4 3 49 3 0 142000 3 1 8 1 6 4 21 3rd Ave & Imjin Pkwy 38 0.61 291 0145 2 8 1 3 4 1 5 230010 1 4 233 X 22 Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd 33 1.61 432 0 2 04 2 7 7140 1 8 1100 2 0 9 1 8 2 X 23 Hwy 1 NB Ramps & Imjin Pkwy 22 0 . 0 3 5 7 0023 1 7 62 1 0 020200 1 2 232 24 2nd Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off‐Ramp 14 ‐0 . 0 5 3 4 0012 1 1 01 1 2 000100 1 2 002 25 Lake Dr & Robin Dr 13 0 . 8 3 2 8 0011 1 1 0021901009482 26 Del Monte Blvd & Cypress Ave 12 0 . 2 6 3 6 002195221100101211 27 Del Monte Blvd & Carmel Ave 9 0 . 0 39000096110100001142 1 / 3
6/3/2022
84 ID
Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Locations
28 4th Ave & Imjin Pkwy 10 ‐0 . 0 8 1 5 000192221300004030 X 29 California Ave & Carmel Ave 9 0 . 1 1 3 4 001353020001215122 X 30 Reservation Rd & Seaside Ct 8 ‐0 . 1 0 2 7 002061110401002330 X 31 Seacrest Ave & Carmel Ave 8 0 . 1 7 1 8 000260320100202130 32 Bayer St & Reservation Rd 8 ‐0 . 1 1 3 2 002155020000011100 X 33 Marina Dr & Debbie Dr 2 0 . 3 0 1 2 001010000000100110 34 Sunset Ave & Hillcrest Ave 7 0 . 2 37000071310001100241 35 Lake Dr & Robin Dr 6 0 . 1 66000061020200001321
36 Del Monte Blvd & Mortimer Ln 8 ‐0 . 0 6 1 3 000175210000001000 37 Owen Ave & Reindollar Ave 6 0 . 0 16000061211001001131 38 Sunset Ave & Palm Ave 6 0.02 195 010051210001101120
39 Viking Ln & Reservation Rd 6 ‐0 . 1 5 6000060230100000231 40 Crescent Ave & Carmel Ave 6 0 . 0 16000060201102001422 41 Del Mo
nte Blvd & Paul Davis Dr 6 0.29 205 011041200001110012
42 California Ave & Reindollar Ave 6 ‐0 . 0 9 2 1 001141101110103110 43 2nd Ave & 10th St 5 ‐0 . 0 2 5000051220000003020
44 2nd Ave & 9th St 5 0 . 0 85000052020100001120
45 Lake Ct & Palm Ave 5 0 . 0 45000050010100100120
46 Hwy 1 SB Ramps & Reservation Rd 5 ‐0 . 2 0 5000053200000000110 47 Marina Dr & Palm Ave 5 0 . 0 45000051110002001031
48 Owen Ave & H illcrest  Ave 5 2 . 4 95000050410000001010 49 Sunset Ave & Carmel Ave 5 ‐0 . 0 5 5000052030000003011 50 Crescent Ave & Hillcrest Ave 5 2 . 4 9 1 5 001042110000100002 51 Sunset Ave & Reindollar Ave 4 ‐0 . 1 6 4000043100000001000 52 Marina Dr & Beach Rd 4 ‐0 . 0 5 2 4 001213000001001000 53 Vista Del Camino & Susan Ave/Peninsula Dr 4 1 . 2 04000040220000000010 54 Begonia Cir & Beach Rd 4 ‐0 . 0 5 4000041100001000100 55 Del Monte Blvd & Cypress Knolls 4 0 . 0 14000040211000000210 56 Melanie Rd & Beach Rd 4 ‐0 . 0 5 1 4 001030300000100001 57 De Forest Rd & Beach Rd 4 ‐0 . 0 5 4000041011000000131 2 / 3
6/3/2022
85 ID
Intersection
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case Study Locations
58 Carmelo Cir & Carmel Ave 4 ‐0 . 0 5 4000041210000001000 59 Elm Ave & Palm Ave 3 ‐0 . 1 6 3000031110000000000
60 Casa De Bolea & Carmel Ave 3 ‐0 . 1 6 3000031200000000111 61 Crescent St & Patton Pkwy 3 ‐0 . 2 2 8000121110000000001 62 Vera Ln & Reindollar Ave 3 ‐0 . 2 0 3000031110000000110 63 Crescent St & Reindollar Ave 3 ‐0 . 2 0 3000030110001001000 64 Marina Dr & Lillian Pl 3 1 . 0 33000031001001000010
65 Carmel Ave & Zanetta Dr 3 ‐0 . 1 6 3000031020000001110 66 Redwood Dr & Carmel Ave 3 ‐0 . 2 0 3000031010100001100 67 Brostrom Dr & Abrams Dr 3 ‐0 . 1 6 1 9 2 010021001001002010 68 Lynscott Dr & Carmel Ave 3 ‐0 . 1 6 1 3 001020101000100210 69 Injum Ct & Brostrom Dr 3 1 . 0 33000031100001000000
70 Bayer St & Crivello Rd 3 ‐0 . 1 6 1 8 001110101000100120 71 Salinas Ave & Reservation Rd 3 ‐0 . 2 4 3000030120000001000 72 Arnold Ct & Landrum Ct 3 1 . 0 33000032100000000020
73 Cardoza Ave & Dolphin Cir 2 ‐0 . 2 6 1 9 1 100011001000000010 74 Crestview Ct & Reservation Rd 1 ‐0 . 2 9 1 9 0 010000000000010000

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes
3 / 3
6/3/2022
86 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 Appendix

APPENDIX C

SEGMENT NETWORK SCREENING RESULTS
87 ID Facility Cross Street 1C ross Street 2
Crashes
Local CCR Differential1
EPDO2
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Overturned
Other
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Aggressive
Impaired
Dark
Wet
Case  Study Locations
Principal Arterial 3 4 10 34 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 1 Reservation  Rd Crescent Ave Crestview Ct 23 0 . 8 8 4 7 0 0 21 2 0 9452300006271X 2I m j i n  Pkwy Imjin Rd W Abrams Dr 18 1.52 23 0 0 0 1 17 1 3 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 12 1 5 1 X 3I m j i n  Pkwy Preston Dr E Abrams Dr 18 0.43 43 0 0 0 5 13 1 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 2 2 2 4I m j i n  Pkwy W Abrams Dr California Dr 16 0.66 36 0 0 1 2 13 1 0 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 2 1 3 X 5I m j i n  Pkwy 3rd Ave 2nd Ave 14 0 . 4 0 5 4 0 0 16701 1 1 110000 1 0 231X 6I m j i n  Rd Reservation Rd Preston Dr 12 0 . 0 4 3 2 0 0 0481280001005140 7 Reservation  Rd Imjin Pkwy Mbest Dr 11 ‐0 . 2 4 2 1 0 0 029008111000 1 1 021 8D e l  Monte Blvd Mortimer Ln Reservation Rd 10 0 . 6 5 2 9 0 0 2082320000122311 9 Reservation  Rd Salinas Ave Imjin Parkway 6 ‐0 . 5 9 6 0 0 0061130001002230X 10 Imjin  Pkwy East 3rd Ave Imjin Rd 5 ‐0. 5 9 1 5 0 0 1040230000003021 11 Imjin Pkwy Hwy 1 NB Off‐Ramp 2nd Ave 5 ‐0 . 2 3 1 5 0 0 0230050000005001 12 Reservation  Rd Mbest Dr City Limits 5 ‐0 . 5 6 1 5 0 0 1041010200015003 13 Del  Monte Blvd Cypress Ave Palm Ave 5 0 . 3 9 1 5 0 0 0230140000003110 14 Imjin  Pkwy California Dr 4th Ave 2 ‐0.80 175 1 0 1001010000001100X Minor Arterial 34 34 29
15 Reservation  Rd Hwy 1 NB Ramps Hwy 1 SB Ramps 6 0 . 7 7 6 0 0 0062121000002012 16 Reservation  Rd Beach Rd Seaside Ct 5 ‐0 . 0 2 1 0 0 0 0145000000000113 Collector
17 Seacrest  Ave Carmel  Ave Reservation  Rd 11 3 . 1 6 1 6 0 0 01 1 0 2431001002031 18 Crescent  Ave Carmel Ave Reservation Rd 10 2 . 7 5 3 0 0 0 1275210100000210 19 Reindollar  Ave Del Monte Blvd Sunset Ave 6 1 . 3 0 1 1 0 0 0150410000010010 20 Lake  Dr Palm Ave Messinger Dr 3 0 . 5 3 3 0 0 0032100000000010 21 De  Forest Rd Reservation Rd Viking St 3 1 . 2 0 3 0 0 0030120000000010 22 Del  Monte Blvd Cypress Knolls Cosky Dr 3 0 . 6 9 3 0 0 0031100001000010 Local Roads
23 Cypress  Ave Del  Monte Blvd Sunset  Ave 5 2 1 . 0 1 5 0 0 0052111000001000 24 Hillcrest  Ave Zanetta Dr Crescent Ave 4 1 0 . 8 2 4 0 0 0042110000000000 25 Paul  Davis Dr Healy Ave Del Monte Blvd 4 8 . 1 8 4 0 0 0042110000000000 26 Dunes  Dr Reservation Rd Dunes Ct 3 6 . 3 7 3 0 0 0030000201000110

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes
1 / 1
6/3/2022
88 City of Marina LRSP July 2022 Appendix

APPENDIX D

PROJECT SHEETS
89 City of Marina LRSP
Project Sheets
Location: Reservation Road and De Forest Road
Total Crashes 21
Local CCR Differential -0.32
Equivalent Property Damage Only 61
Fatal 0
Severe Injury 0
Other Visible Injury 2
Complaint of Pain 4
PDO 15
Crash Type
Broadside 6
Sideswipe 4
Rear End 6
Head On 0
Hit Object 0
Overturned 0
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian 2
Bicycle 1
Contributing Factors
Aggressive 4
Impaired 1
Crash Conditions
Dark 3
Wet 3
COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LRSM/CMF  COUNTERMEASURE LRSM  # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING
NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH SEVERITY
COST
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)
TOTAL 10‐YEAR
CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)

QUANTITY/
NUMBER OF
UNITS
UNIT COST COST  ESTIMATE BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000 $           ‐ $
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000 $           ‐ $
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.5 1.00 159,900 $              159,900$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.25 0.50 90,900$                 45,450$ P
DO 0 0 0.00 14,900$                 ‐$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 2 1.2 2.40 159,900$              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.6 1.20 90,900$                 109,080$ PDO 0 0 0.00 14,900$                 ‐$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.3 0.60 159,900$              95,940$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.15 0.30 90,900$                 27,270$ PDO 0 0 0.00 14,900$                 ‐$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 1 0.4 0.80 159,900$              127,920$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 90,900$                 ‐$
P
DO 2 0.8 1.60 14,900$                 23,840$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,843,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 2,843,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.9 1.80 159,900$              287,820$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.45 0.90 90,900$                 81,810$ PDO 0 0 0.00 14,900$                 ‐$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.3 0.60 159,900$              95,940$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 4 0.6 1.20 90,900$                 109,080$ PDO 15 2.25 4.50 14,900$                 67,050$
Signalized Intersection
1,980$                   22,623$                 1620 0.55 90% 369,630$              11 CYPedestrian and Bicycle Provide refuge islands
for the crossings on
Reservation
Install raised medians (refuge
islands) NS19PB
11,000$                 33,000$                 520 0.60 100% 151,760$              3 LuminairesDark Add additional
luminaires to
approaches

89.6 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Green bike lane
treatment in conflict
zones
Install advance stop bar before
crosswalk (Bicycle Box) S 20PB 10 0.85 100% 123,210$              320 SQFT 5.50$                     1,760$                   70.0 10 0.40
1200 SQFT
Add intersection lighting S01
5,500$                   5,500$                  100% 492,840$              1 Lump SumPedestrian and Bicycle Implement a  Leading
Pedestrian Interval
(LPI)
Modify signal phasing to implement
LPI S21PB
20Pedestrian and Bicycle Stripe  crosswalks Install  pedestrian crossings (S.I.) S18PB NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2015‐2019)

6.60$                     7,920$                   260.75 100% 205,350$ All Install Re troreflective
Backplates
Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back‐plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and
number
S02 10 0.85 100% 272,070$              16 RFBs 825 $                      13,200$                 21 90 City of Marina LRSP
Project Sheets
Intersections Total Segments Total Del Monte Blvd Crescent Ave Seacrest Ave De Forest Road Vista Del Camino California Ave Marina Square Eastern Driveway Reservation Road at: ‐California Ave Total Crashes 168 31 53 38 25 21 11 11 9 ‐Crescent Ave Local CCR Differential - - 0.29 0.03 -0.21 -0.32 -0.55 -0.57 -0.60 ‐De Forest Rd Equivalent Property Damage Only 465 55 98.00 82 40 61.00 21.00 144.00 19.00 ‐Marina Square Eas Fatal 0000 0 0 0 0 0
‐Seacrest Ave Severe Injury 1000 0 0 0 1 0
‐Vista Del Camino Other Visible Injury 8223 0 2 0 1 0
‐Del Monte Blvd Complaint of Pain 20 1 5 3 3 4 2 1 2
PDO 139 28 46 32 22 15 9 8 7
Crash Type
Broadside 31 10 11 4 4 6 3 0 3
Sideswipe 47 5 21 10 7 4 0 4 1
Rear End 50 9 13 10 7 6 7 4 3
Head On 6221 1 0 0 1 1
Hit Object 9325 0 0 1 1 0
Overturned 3001 0 0 0 1 1
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian 6112 1 2 0 0 0
Bicycle 3011 0 1 0 0 0
Contributing Factors
Aggressive 49 9 15 9 6 4 6 6 3
Impaired 17 4 4 5 4 1 2 0 1
Crash Conditions
Dark 43 10 17 14 1 3 4 3 1
Wet 18 1 9 3 0 3 2 1 0
COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LRSM/CMF  COUNTERMEASURE LRSM  # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING
NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION
ESTIMATE CRASH SEVERITY COST
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)
TOTAL 10‐YEAR
CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)

QUANTITY/
NUMBER OF
UNITS
UNIT COST COST  ESTIMATE BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 1 0.15 0.30 1,787,000$                                          536,100$ OTHER VISIBLE 8 1.2 2.40 159,900$                                              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF P AIN 20 3 6.00 90,900$                                                545,400$ PDO 139 20.85 41.70 14,900$                                                621,330$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 1 0.15 0.30 1,787,000$                                          536,100$ OTHER VISIBLE 8 1.2 2.40 159,900$                                              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 20 3 6.00 90,900$                                                545,400$ PDO 139 20.85 41.70 14,900$                                                621,330$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 1 0.4 0.80 1,787,000$                                          1,429,600$ OTHER VISIBLE 8 3.2 6.40 159,900$                                              1,023,360$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 20 8 16.00 90,900$                                                1,454,400$ PDO 139 55.6 111.20 14,900$                                                1,656,880$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$                                              ‐$ COMPLAINT OF P AIN 0 0 0.00 90,900$                                                ‐$ PDO 1 0.25 0.50 14,900$                                                7,450$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 1 0.1 0.20 1,787,000$                                          357,400$ OTHER VISIBLE 8 0.8 1.60 159,900$                                              255,840$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 20 2 4.00 90,900$                                                363,600$ PDO 139 13.9 27.80 14,900$                                                414,220$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$                                          ‐$ OTHER VISIBLE 2 1.2 2.40 159,900$                                              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 1.8 3.60 90,900$                                                327,240$ PDO 4 2.4 4.80 14,900$                                                71,520$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$                                          ‐$ SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$                                          ‐$ OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.6 1.20 159,900$                                              191,880$ COMPLAINT OF PA IN 1 0.3 0.60 90,900$                                                54,540$ PDO 28 8.4 16.80 14,900$                                                250,320$ FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,843,000 $                                          ‐ $ SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 2,843,000 $                                          ‐ $ OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.9 1.80 159,900 $                                              287,820$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 1.35 2.70 90,900 $                                                245,430$ PDO 4 1.8 3.60 14,900 $                                                53,640$ All roadway segments of Reservation Road
from Imjin Pkwy to Del Monte Blvd
Locations Include:

Corridor Improvements: Signalized Intersections and Roadway Segments 5,500$
1,391,060$            17400 SQFT 5.50$
S21PB 38,500$                 20.30.40 100% 782,520$               7 Intersections 231,000$               0.03
All Refresh intersection
pavement markings
Install raised pavement markers and
striping (Through Intersection) S09 10 0.90 100%
10 0.75 100% 7,450$                    7 Intersections 33,000$

14.5 10
5,564,240$            7 Intersections 44,000$                 308,000$               18.1 Emergency Vehicles Install emergency vehicle pre‐emption systems  S05
All Provide Advanced Dilemma‐Zone
Detection for high sp eed  approaches S04 10 0.60 100%
95,634$
Pedestrian and Bicycle Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
10 0.85 50%
2,086,590$            100 RFBs 825 $                       82,500$                 25 Coordinate the signals along
the corridor
Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) S03 38,500$                 54.22,086,590$            7 intersections 5,500$ NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2015‐2019)
All Install Retroreflective
B
ackplates
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back‐
plates with retroreflective borders,
mounting, size, and
number
S02 10 0.85 100%
496,740$               4 Signs 8,360$                    33,440$                 14.9 11 CY 1,980$                    158,363$               4Pedestrian and Bicycle Provide refuge islands
for the crossings on
Reservation
Install raised medians (refuge islands) NS19PB 20 0.55 90% 586,890$ All Install dynamic/variable speed
warning signs R26 10 0.70 100%
91 City of Marina LRSP
Project Sheets
Location: Imjin Parkway and 3rd Avenue
Total Crashes 48*
Local CCR Differential 0.61
Equivalent Property Damage Only 514
Fatal 1 574,002$
Severe Injury 2 727,002$
Other Visible Injury 6 212,102$
Complaint of Pain 6 939,104$
PDO 33 187,821$
Crash Type 1,126,925$
Broadside 16.00
Sideswipe 6
Rear End 18
Head On 2
Hit Object 3
Overturned 0
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian 3
Bicycle 0
Contributing Factors
Aggressive 17
Impaired 3
Crash Conditions
Dark 5
Wet 3
*Using crash data from 2017-2021
NOTES COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LRSM/CMF  COUNTERMEASURE LRSM  # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING
NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH SEVERITY
COST
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)
TOTAL 10‐YEAR
CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)

QUANTITY/
NUMBER OF
UNITS
UNIT COST COST  ESTIMATE BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 1 0.3 0.60 2,843,000$           1,705,800$
SERIOUS 2 0.6 1.20 2,843,000$           3,411,600$
OTHER VISIBLE 6 1.8 3.60 159,900$              575,640$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 6 1.8 3.60 90,900$                327,240$ PDO 33 9.9 19.80 14,900$                295,020$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,843,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 1 0.4 0.80 2,843,000$           2,274,400$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.4 0.80 90,900$                72,720$ PDO 3 1.2 2.40 14,900$                35,760$
FATAL 1 0.25 0.50 1,787,000$           893,500$
SERIOUS 1 0.25 0.50 1,787,000$           893,500$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 90,900$                ‐$
PDO 1 0.25 0.50 14,900$                7,450$
FATAL 1 0.15 0.30 1,787,000$           536,100$
SERIOUS 2 0.3 0.60 1,787,000$           1,072,200$
OTHER VISIBLE 6 0.9 1.80 159,900$              287,820$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 6 0.9 1.80 90,900$                163,620$ PDO 33 4.95 9.90 14,900$                147,510$
FATAL 1 0.15 0.30 1,787,000$           536,100$
SERIOUS 2 0.3 0.60 1,787,000$           1,072,200$
OTHER VISIBLE 6 0.9 1.80 159,900$              287,820$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 6 0.9 1.80 90,900$                163,620$ PDO 33 4.95 9.90 14,900$                147,510$
FATAL 1 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 2 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 6 0 0.00 142,300$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 6 0 0.00 80,900$                ‐$
PDO 33 0 0.00 13,300$                ‐$
FATAL 1 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 1 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 142,300$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 80,900$                ‐$
PDO 1 0 0.00 13,300$                ‐$
FATAL 1 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 1 0 0.00 2,530,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 142,300$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 80,900$                ‐$
PDO 1 0 0.00 13,300$                ‐$
574,002$ Sub-Total of Major Construction Items:

Summary of Project Costs
Sub‐Total of Major Construction Items:

Sub‐Total of Construction Costs:

Sub‐Total Design and Project Admin:

Sub‐Total:

Contingency (20%):

Total Project Cost Estimate:
44$                        50,864$                0.0
Includes curb & gutter on 1 side of
roadway, and 2' sawcut/demo ‐ Minor Concrete (Curb
and Gutter) ‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐$                           86 LF 33 $                        2,838$                   0.0 ‐‐‐ ‐$                           1156 LF
Includes curb ramp and sidewalk cost,
demolition/modification to existing.

Assume sidewalk widening feasible
along full length of identified locations
‐ Minor Concrete
(Si
dewalk) ‐‐
33,000$                33,000$                66.9
HMA conform sidewalk (2') ‐ Roadway Paving ‐ ‐‐‐‐ ‐$                           300 SF 22$                        6,600$                   0.0 10 0.85 50% 2,207,250$           1 Lump Sum
Utllizes exiting fiber along Imjin and
includes work to splice and bring fiber
into cabinet
All Interconnect to 2nd
Ave Signal
Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) S03
825$                      13,200$                167.210 0.85 100% 2,207,250$           16 RFBs‐ All Install Retroreflective Backplates
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back‐
plates with retroreflective borders,
mounting, size, and
number
S02
Unsignalized Intersection
NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2015‐2019)
Includes installation of new traffic
signal, lighting,
advance loops, and other equipment at
intersection
(390K). Plus 20k for new service point.

All
Traffic Signal, Lighting,
and Electrical
Improvements
Install Signals NS03 20 0.70 100%
Includes installation of street lighting Dark
Add additional
luminaires to
approaches
Add intersection lighting NS01
6,315,300$           1 Lump Sum 451,000$              451,000$              14 5,500$                   433.3
As
sumes striping, markings, signs and
removal of
existing striping
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Stripe ladder
crosswalk and Class II
Biclycle Crosswalks
Install pedestrian crossing at
uncontrolled locations (signs and
markings only)
S18PB 20 0.75 90%
20 0.60 100% 2,382,880$           1 Lump Sum 5,500$
1,794,450$           1 Lump Sum 11,000$                11,000$                163.1 92 City of Marina LRSP
Project Sheets
Intersection
Total
Segments
Total
Imjin and
California Imjin and 2nd Imjin to Abrams Abrams to CA CA to 4th 4th to 3rd 3rd to 2nd Imjin Pkwy at: -2nd Ave Total Crashes 144 52 65 79 18 16 2 2 14 -California Ave Local CCR Differential - 2.79 0.52 0.71 1.52 0.66 -0.80 1.01 0.40 Equivalent Property Damage Only 308 290 159 149 23 36 175 2 54 Fatal 0100 0 0 1 0 0
Severe Injury 0000 0 0 0 0 0
Other Visible Injury 8353 0 1 1 0 1
Complaint of Pain 17 9 9 8 1 2 0 0 6
PDO 119 39 51 68 17 13 0 2 7
Crash Type
Broadside 25 3 18 7 1 1 1 0 0
Sideswipe 19 6 12 7 3 0 0 2 1
Rear End 8 53 62 46 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1
Head On 2220 0 1 0 0 1
Hit Object 4531 3 1 0 0 1
Overturned 0000 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian 0000 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycle 1010 0 0 0 0 0
Contributing Factors
Aggressive 79 35 28 51 12 12 1 0 10
Impaired 8726 1 2 1 1 2
Crash Conditions
Dark2 6 9 1 6 1 0 5 1 003
Wet 1 0 564 1 3 0 0 1
NOTES COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LRSM/CMF  COUNTERMEASURE LRSM  # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING
NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH SEVERITY
COST
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)
TOTAL 10‐YEAR
CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)

QUANTITY/
NUMBER OF
UNITS
UNIT COST COST  ESTIMATE BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 8 1.2 2.40 159,900$              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 17 2.55 5.10 90,900$                463,590$ P
DO 119 17.85 35.70 14,900$                531,930$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 8 1.2 2.40 159,900$              383,760$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 17 2.55 5.10 90,900$                463,590$ PDO 119 17.85 35.70 14,900$                531,930$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 8 3.2 6.40 159,900$              1,023,360$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 17 6.8 13.60 90,900$                1,236,240$ PDO 119 47.6 95.20 14,900$                1,418,480$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 90,900$                ‐$
PDO 1 0.25 0.50 14,900$                7,450$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 1,787,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 8 0.8 1.60 159,900$              255,840$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 17 1.7 3.40 90,900$                309,060$ PDO 119 11.9 23.80 14,900$                354,620$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 8 2.4 4.80 159,900$              767,520$ COMPLAINT OF PAIN 17 5.1 10.20 90,900$                927,180$ PDO 119 35.7 71.40 14,900$                1,063,860$

76.510
2 Signs per direction All Install dynamic/variable s peed warning signs R26 10 0.70 100% 2,758,560$
‐ Emergency Vehicles Install emergency vehicle pre‐emption systems  S05 33,000$

0.90 100% 919,520$              4968 SQFT 2.42 $

0.75 100% 7,450$                   3 Intersections 11,000$ ‐ All Refresh intersection
pavement markings
Install raised pavement markers and
striping (Through Intersection) S09 12,023$
‐ All Provide Advanced Dilemma‐Zone
Detection for high speed approaches S04 10 0.60 100%
10 0.85 50%
Optional Signage,
Traffic signa l  at
Abrams to be
coordinated as well
All
Coordinate the signals
at 2nd,  California and
Abrams
Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) S03
‐ All
16,500$                83.61,379,280$           3 Intersections 5,500$ NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2015‐2019)
Install Retroreflective
Backplates
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back‐
plates with retroreflective borders,
mounting, size, and
number
S0
2 0.210
36 RFBs 825$                      29,700$                46 3,678,080$           3 Intersections 44,000$                132,000$              27.9 10 0.85 100% 1,379,280$
Locations Include:
-All roadway
segments of Imjin
Pkwy from Imjin Rd
to 2nd Ave
Corridor Improvements: Signalized Intersections And Roadway Segments 4 Signs 8,360 $                   33,440$                82.5 93 City of Marina LRSP
Project Sheets
Location: Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road
Total Crashes 33
Local CCR Differential 1.61
Equivalent Property Damage Only 432
Fatal 0
Severe Injury 2
Other Visible Injury 0
Complaint of Pain 4
PDO 27
Crash Type
Broadside 7.00
Sideswipe 1
Rear End 4
Head On 0
Hit Object 18
Overturned 1
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian 0
Bicycle 0
Contributing Factors
Aggressive 20
Impaired 9
Crash Conditions
Dark 18
Wet 2
Roadway segment countermeasures are being recommended here, to reduce approach speeds and thereby reduce the number of aggressive driving crashes at the roundabout NOTES COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LRSM/CMF  COUNTERMEASURE LRSM  # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING
NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH SEVERITY
COST
10‐YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)
TOTAL 10‐YEAR
CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2016 $)

QUANTITY/
NUMBER OF
UNITS
UNIT COST COST  ESTIMATE BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 2 0.3 0.60 2,461,000$           1,476,600$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 4 0.6 1.20 90,900$                109,080$ P
DO 27 4.05 8.10 14,900$                120,690$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 2 0.6 1.20 2,461,000$           2,953,200$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 4 1.2 2.40 90,900$                218,160$ PDO 27 8.1 16.20 14,900$                241,380$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 2 0.6 1.20 2,461,000$           2,953,200$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 4 1.2 2.40 90,900$                218,160$ PDO 27 8.1 16.20 14,900$                241,380$
FATAL 0 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
SERIOUS 2 0 0.00 2,461,000$           ‐$
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 159,900$              ‐$
COMPLAINT OF P AIN 4 0 0.00 90,900$                ‐$
PDO 27 0 0.00 14,900$                ‐$
265
11,000$                310.2
‐ All
Reduce NB approach
to 1 lane 300' after the
intx of Reservation Rd
and Del Monte Blvd
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4
to 3 and add a two way left‐turn and
bike lanes)
R14 20 0.70 90%
10 0.70 100% 3,412,740$           1 Lump Sum 11,000$
3,412,740$           2200 LF of st
iping 2.09$                     4,598$                   742.2 ‐ All Add speed feedback
sign to NB approach
Install dynamic/variable speed
warning signs  R26
1,706,370$           90 Delineators 72$                        6,435$ NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2015‐2019)
Goal is to reduce entry
speeds by narrowing
the approaches
All
Insert
delineators/bollards
on NB approach
Install delineators, reflectors and/or
object ma rkers R27 10 0.85 100%
Roundabout

0.0 No applicable
countermeasure in
the Local Road Safety
Manual
All ‐ ‐$                           200 LF 67 $                        13,402$               ‐ Install a fence in the median of the NB approach to limit line of sight ‐‐‐
94 August 10, 2022 Item No. 11b

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of August 16, 2022

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 22-,

AUTHORIZING THE RESUMPTION OF CITY COMMISSIONS,

COMMITTEES AND BOARDS AND AUTHORIZING THE DISBANDING

OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -

1. Authorizing the resumption of the Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, the Public Works Commission, the Economic Development Commission and the Tree Committee.

2. Authorizing the disbanding of the Design Review Board.

BACKGROUND:

In March 2020, the City Manager issued an Emergency Proclamation subsequently approved by the City Council temporarily discontinuing all City Commissions, Committees and Boards except for those required by State law.

Since March 2020, the only regular public meetings being held in the City are the City Council and Planning Commission meetings. Under Covid protocol and in compliance with State guidelines these meetings have been functioning only over Zoom and have not been in-person yet.

Recently adopted new State law continues to allow these meetings to continue exclusively over Zoom, however, in-person or hybrid meetings are also allowed.

At this point, the City of Marina is not scheduling in-person City Council or Planning Commission meetings. Staff has looked at minimum upgrades to the city council chambers that would provide for improvements for better social distancing for the council, staff and members of the public; improved ventilation; improved lighting; replacing of the car pet and painting; and upgrades to video equipment for hybrid type meetings etc. These bare minimum upgrades will be around $250,000. Given that we are still pursuing a potential bond measure for a new community center facility, we are holding off making any of these bare minimum improvements for now and will continue with Zoom meetings.

ANALYSIS:

Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the resumption of the Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, the Public Works Commission, the Econom ic Development Commission and the Tree Committee as soon as possible. Most members of these Commissions and Committees terms have expired, so staff will need to begin advertising for new commissioners and committee members.

Whether or not the Commissions and Committees will meet over Zoom or in -person will be determined by staff working with the Chair and the Staff Liaison from the Council for the various commissions and committees.

On November 12, 2019, a presentation was made to a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting by Erik Ramakrishnan , special counsel with Goldfarb and Lipman, regarding recent changes to state laws with specific emphasis on Senate Bill SB 330 and the new provisions after a formal housing project submittal is received. Under the new law, the City is limited to only five (5) meetings in total for the review of the project with advisory meetings and community meetings included in this total.

The Council directed staff to look at different structures to utiliz e the advisory commissions and committees to review trees and designs during the plan review process while taking into account the new state law and leaving at least two meetings each for the City Council and Planning Commission to review a project application. The following is staff’s analysis of this issue.

Tree Committee
Per the City’s Tree Ordinance, if a tree is planned for removal in Marina the Tree Committee is required to give approval with certain exceptions.1 Under the provisions of the Marina Municipal Code, an arborist report shall be submitted for the removal of a tree. 2 For most land development projects, trees are on the lot and the expertise of an arborist are needed to evaluate if trees can be saved, relocated or removed as part of the project. The Tree Committee can play a valuable role in providing input to city staff and the arborist in ensuring the appropriate number of trees are removed and replaced so long as the direction provided is in a manner that is consistent and objective.

Staff is recommending that the Tree Committee start meeting again. Staff and the City Attorney will work together in determining the impact of SB330 with this Committee meeting again. An independent meeting of the Tree Committee will count as one of the f ive meetings for an application. Typically, most applications will not require five meetings so there typically would not be an impact having the Tree Committee meetings. If a more complex development application were filed and staff felt we might be pre ssed in approving the project in five meetings, the Tree Committee meetings could be scheduled and held as part of the Planning Commission meeting and would not count as an independent meeting.

An alternative would be to disband the Tree Committee and try to appoint a couple new Planning Commissioners that had tree or arborist experience and as part of the applicants discussion at the Planning Commission, part of that meeting would include a Tree Committee like discussion with specific reviews of trees in the application project. A major downside of this approach is that any tree issues would not be resolved prior to the Planning Commission meeting.

Another alternative would be to hire an arborist to peer review reports submitted by applicants. A major downside of this approach would be public input would not be included in the process until the application got to t he Planning Commission . Staff is not recommending either of these alternatives.

Design Review Board (DRB)
Per the Marina Municipal Code, the Design Review Board is charged with providing recommendations to the Planning Commission on the site and architectural review of projects. 3 Additionally, the Municipal Code delegates review of sign permits to the Design Review Board as well.4 Recent changes to state law mandate that all cities streamline the development of housing

1See Section 17.62.040 for the common exceptions to the tree removal permit process, including the most common which is if the tree is on an R-1 Single Family lot, https://marina.municipal.codes/Code/17.62.040 2 See 17.62.060 of the Marina Municipal Code, https://marina.municipal.codes/Code/17.62.060 3 See 17.56.010-Site and architectural design review board—Approval required when. 4 17.46.040-Design review board approval required.
projects. On October 9, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 330 and in doing so declared a statewide housing emergency to be in effect until January 1, 2025. The subsequent signing of SB 8 extended this emergency to January 1, 2030.5 In total, thirty-one (31) housing related bills have been signed by Governor Newson in the past few legislative cycles all with the intent to streamline the development of housing projects and to further limit the ability of local agencies to deny housing projects.

In addition to the plethora of housing bills, after January 1, 2020, multifamily housing projects, transitional and supportive housing and mixed -use projects with at least two -thirds (2/3s) of the square footage designated for residential uses, must be reviewed for conformance with obj ective zoning standards:

“Objective design standard” means a design standard that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and is uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and know able by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official before submittal of an application.6

If a city wants to deny a housing project,7 it must make specific findings of fact detailing how the project is not consistent with objective design standards and that the project has a specific adverse effect to public health and safety that can’t be mitigated in any other way.8 In effect “super findings of fact” must be made to deny a multifamily housing and mixed-use project moving forward.9

Given the provisions of SB 330 after a formal submittal is received, limiting the City to only five (5) meetings in total for the review of the project with advisory meetings and community meetings included in this total , and because the general orientation of housing bills is moving towards streamlining of development and requiring consistency with adopted objective standards, city staff are not recommending bringing back the DRB.

However, there is utility in having some type of architectural review of the submitted plans so the Planning Commission can rely on this expertise. As such, until such time as the objective zoning standards are adopted by the City Council it makes sense from a policy perspective to have architectural plans peer reviewed by a licensed architect or urban designer of the City’s choosing to ensure the bulk, mass and scale of the development is consistent with the existing neighborhood and the Marina Design Guidelines.

In terms of the DRB review of sign permits, for the most part, sign permits have a very clear review process by staff. A sign must meet certain height, wattage, and square footage requirements. If met, in most municipal agencies, a permit is granted. Marina has the additional requiremen t that sign permits, in most commercial properties also comply with a Master Sign Program (MSP) to further ensure a sign has the same look and feel of neighboring buildings. Making applicants attend a public hearing for practically every sign permit seems like a burden on applicants and unnecessary delays issuance of permits. Additionally, public view of sign permits unnecessary drives up the cost of the permit. As such, this is another example of the City Council being able to reimagine the development review process for the benefit of customers and residents.

5 SB 330 (Housing Crisis Act of 2019).
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB330 .

See also Senate Bill 8- https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB8 6 Housing Accountability Act and Senate Bill 35 (Government Code Sections 65589.5 and 65913.4), 7 Per recent changes to the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) a housing project is defined as two or more units. 8 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) presentation:
https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Planning_Innovations_Presentations.pdf 9 The City Council will be reviewing the objective zoning standards contract in September and city staff look forward to completing this project in the near term

If the Council authorizes disbanding the Design Review Board, staff will bring back to the Council an Ordinance amending the Municipal Code to abolish this body. Additionally, staff will continue working on the Objective Zoning Standards and will create a list of architects or urban designers who can peer review housing projects in the interim period.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no additional fiscal impact for bringing back the existing advisory commissions, committees and boards other than the additional staff support and resources needed to prepare for and facilitate their meetings.

CONCLUSION:

Advisory committees prov ide a valuable policy tool for the City Council, as these legislative bodies can be subject matter experts for the City Council and provide another vehicle for public input on various municipal issues facing the City of Marina.

The Public Works Commission , Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, Economic Development Commission and Tree Committee are recommended to be resumed with recruitment for the vacant positions on the these to begin as soon as possible. However, considering recent changes to state law, bringing back the Design Review Board is not recommended.

PREPARED:

Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AUTHORIZING

THE RESUMPTION OF CITY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS AND AUTHORIZING THE DISBANDING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.

WHEREAS, The City of Marina issued an Emergency Proclamation and temporarily discontinued all City Commissions, Committees and Boards due to the Covid pandemic except for those required by State law; and

WHEREAS, Under Covid protocol and in compliance with State guidelines, these commissions, committees and boards are allowed to meet again in -person over Zoom or with a hybrid type meeting; and

WHEREAS, City staff is at level to where they can provide most of the staff support needed to resume these commissions, committees and boards; and

WHEREAS, There is a public need and benefit to resuming the Public Works Commission, the Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, the Economic Development Commission and the Tree Committee; and

WHEREAS, Due to SB 330, SB 8 and over thirty-one (31) other housing related bills limiting the City to only five (5) meetings in total for a review of a housing project and new requirements for specific adopted objective standards, bringing back the Design Review Board will cause problems with the new streamlining standards and requiring consistency with adopted objective standards.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby authorize resumption of th e Public Works Commission, the Recreation and Cultural Services Commission, the Economic Development Commission, and the Tree Committee; and also authorizes the disbanding of the Design Review Board.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of M arina at a reg ular meeting duly held on the 16th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
August 4, 2022 Item No. 11c
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of August 16, 2022

THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVES AN UPDATE REPORT ON THE
CYPRESS KNOLLS PROPERTY.

REQUEST
It is requested that the Marina City Council:

1. Receive an update report on the Cypress Knolls property.

BACKGROUND
One of the City Council’s top priorities for the current fiscal year budget is to launch working on Cypress Knolls concept planning effort.

Cypress Knolls is centrally located within Marina’s city boundaries and is approximately 188 acres in size. The property is scattered with 230 blighted former Arm y duplex housing units. The property is bounded by Highway 1 to the west, Pat ton Parkway on the north, California Avenue on the east, and Imjin Parkway on the south.

Because of the unique characteristics of the Cypress Knolls property and the opportunities to look at new and alternative affordable housing types, staff reached out to the Planner Emeritus Network (PEN) Community Planning Assistance Team (CPAT) with the California Chapter of the American Planning Association for assistance in moving this project forward. On reviewing the City’s application and goals for this property, the CPAT Committee agreed to take this on as a project.

DISCUSSION
CPAT will engage in a visioning exercise in which the City Council and community will be lead through a process to reimagine the possibilities for the site. The goal is to establish a co mmunity vision that will allow the City to bring on board a consulting team that will create a new master plan for the redevelopment of this site. The core of this master plan will be a focus on developing affordable “work force” housing that bridges that gap between typical single -family home development and apartment complexes. This is sometimes referred to as the “ missing middle” housing market in America today. These products may consist of duplexes side-by-side or stacked; triplexes stacked; fourplex es stacked, townhomes, bungalow or cottage courts, courtyard apartments, multiplex or mansion apartments, live/work apartments, tiny -homes, or other new alternative housing types. The end result will likely be a palette of residential and mixed -use options.

Cypress Knolls is a generational opportunity for the City to take the lead in planning a development project not only around core principles of housing affordability but also principles of: healthy living; open space, parks and recreation; bike and pede strian mobility; economic and fiscal sustainability; reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, VMT, water and energy use, and waste with a net zero development focus; access to alternate transportation networks and trails; respect for Marina ecosystems; 15 minute walk connectivity to housing, jobs, retail, food, recreation, entertainment, and restaurants.

1 The CPAT will perform the following tasks:

1. Collaborate with the City staff to develop a detailed process, time schedule, and desired outcomes and deliverables for the CPAT project;

2. Work with City staff to establish dates, times, and duration for the CPAT preparation meetings, site visit, and public charrette or workshop;

3. Review relevant background reports, technical studies, and other information supplied by the City regarding the Fort Ord base closure and the Cypress Knolls site;

4. With input from the City, organize, lead, and facilitate a public charrette or community workshop with preparation of supporting materials;

5. Provide back-up support to the City on public information and community and press inquiries about the project;

6. Complete a draft CPAT Project Report after the charrette or community workshop for review by the City that is anticipated to include: summary of community comments and preferences; discussion of primary issues, opportunities, and constraints; consensus on guiding principles and development approach; and observations, options, and recommendations on next steps; and

7. Produce a final CPAT Project Report following City review that will be provided to the City in a printable digital format and posted publicly on the APACA CPAT website.

City staff and the CPAT conducted a field review of the site on July 7, 2022. On this day, a list of background documents were requested by the CPAT and subsequently provided by staff. These documents include past Cypress Knolls studies, EIR, CSUMB Master Plan documents, Fort Ord/FORA documents and others.

Next steps: The CPAT would like to interview individual City Council and Planning Commission members for their impressions on the highest and best possible uses for the Cypress Knolls site and their visions for the future of the property before reaching out to the general public.

Project Schedule
August/September
-informational interviews with the APA committee
-meetings with city staff to finalize the details of the project charette October-Project Charette #1
November -Project Charrette #2
February-Presentation of the APA Final Report to the City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The concept plan and recommendations that will result from this effort are advisory-only and will have no regulatory authority. This exercise is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections: 15060(c)(2), because the proposed ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and 15061(b)(3), because the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. 2 FISCAL IMPACT
Other than modest reimbursement costs, the work of the CPAT will be on a voluntary basis. There will be nominal impact to the General Fund.

CONCLUSION
This request is submitted for City Council consideration and comment.

Respectfully submitted,
Alyson Hunter, AICP
Sr. Planner, Community Development Dept.

City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR
_____________________________
Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Director, Community Development Dept.

City of Marina
_____________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 August 12, 2022 Item No. 11d

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of August 16, 2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80 -71, AS AMENDED, PARAGRAPHS 8, 9, 13, AND 27 ,

REGARDING BEST PRACTICES FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND

MEETING EFFICIENCY

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 202 2-, amending Resolution No. 80 -71, as amended, Establishing the Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of Meetings;

2. Amending Paragraph 8 regarding Order of Business and Consideration and Sequence of Agenda Items;

3. Amending Paragraph 9 regarding Preparation of the Minutes;

4. Amending Paragraph 13 regarding Debate;

5. Amending Paragraph 27 regarding Manner of Addressing Council; and

6. Approving a new Agenda format in substantially the same form as Exhibit B.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of December 12, 1980, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 80 -71, “Establishing the Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of Meetings of the City Council” (“Rules and Procedures”). The Rules and Procedures govern Council conduct, and include provisions for the setting meetings, order of the agendas, Council debate, and conflicts of interest.

The Rules and Procedures have been amended multiple times over the years – primarily in regard to the order of the agenda and meeting times .1 (EXHIBIT A.) More recently, the City Council directed staff to bring forward proposals regarding the Rules and Procedures to increase public engagement and improve meeting efficiency. While this is the present direction, a more comprehensive update can be brought forward to align the Rules and Procedures with the Marina Municipal Code, and incorporate all amendments into one document.

ANALYSIS:

Elected officials have a large body of work to get through, and it must be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. A well -organized agenda, appropriate opportunities for public comment and following protocol are all essential to running an effective meeting.

Public Engagement

Public comment is an essential part of local government meetings. Hearing from the public is a critical part o f the Council’s role. Council members need to be in touch with t he public and be responsive. That said, the p urpose of public comment is to inform the Council of the public’s views, and not to enter into debate or dialogue with Council.

1 See Resolutions 85-1, 90-09, 91-17, 92-30, 94-15, 98-03, 99-01, 2001-106, 2009-41, 2011-32, 2011-33, 2011-65, and 2019-107.
1 Time limits on public comment are an important tool for running a meeting of reasonable length, and prioritizing the important discourse while participants are available. General public comment at the meeting’s outset must be balanced against those members of the public that have come to speak on particular agenda items. Extensive general comment, prior to the Council’s deliberation of agendized action items, can fatigue all participants and diminish the quality of the discourse and decision-making.

It is recommended that the Mayor and Council do not respond to general public comments. The Mayor may provide brief factual information, if appropriate, but should not enter into a back and forth exchange or call on staff to provide answers on the spot. A best practice is for staff to note input or questions and provide responses at a later date, or to place the item on a future agenda.

The City may adopt reasonable regulations for public comment, including time limits. Many public agencies allow up to three minutes, which can be limited if there are many participants or to accommodate a lengthy agenda. The public does not need to be given an opportunity to speak on an item that has alrea dy been considered by a committee made up exclusively of members of the Council at a public meeting, if all interested members of the public had the opportunity to speak on the item before or during its consideration, and if the item has not been substanti ally changed. In addition, the City may provide multiple ways for residents to express their views, which can further reduce pressure on meeting time , i.e., by encouraging letters and other written communication.

Staff proposes amendments to the current Agenda template in terms of public comments. (EXHIBIT B.) It is recommended that public input on the Consent Agenda be heard under general Public Comment. In this way, the Consent Agenda may be called, and if no items are pulled, adopted in one motion. Additionally, staff proposes to make the Agenda more user -friendly by including only those items brought forward for Council action.

Staff recommends changes to the Rules and Procedures, Paragraph 8 a), to separate Council and Staff Announcements from Public Comment . Subsection b) modifications reflect the new numbering, and update the Rules with gender -neutral language. Proposed additions are set forth in italicized font; deletions are noted in strikeout font:

8. Order of Business and Consideration and Sequence of Agenda Items.

a) The business of the City Council shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the following order:

1. Call to Order 5:00p.m. (if there is to be a Closed Session)

2. Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum

3. Public Comments

4. Closed Session (if any)
Open Regular Session (6:30 p.m.) - Report Any Action taken in Closed Session

5. Moment of Silence & Pledge of Allegiance

6. Special Presentations - no action; no public comment

7. Special Council and Staff Announcements and Communications from the Floor

8. Public Comment – Up to a maximum of 3 minutes per person

9. Consent Agenda for Successor Agency (If any)

10. Consent Agenda

11. Public Hearings

12. Other Council Action Items of the Successor Agency

13. Other Action Items:

14. Council & Staff Informational Reports – no action taken, no public comment

15. Adjournment
2 b) The Mayor, at their his/her discretion and subject to majority vote overruling them him/her, may re-arrange agenda items, provided that any items ‘pulled’ from Item 98, ‘Consent Agenda’ shall be considered following the last item of ltem 1110, “Other Council Action Items.”

Paragraph 27 a) of the Rules and Procedures, entitled “Manner of Addressing Council,” sets forth the allotted time for public comments. Proposed modifications consider that members of the public cannot be required to provide their names or other information as prerequisite to speaking, and that the Council has the ability to limit public comment where necessary for meeting efficiency.

Proposed additions are shown in italicized font; deletions are in strikeout font:

27. Addressing the Council

a) Manner of Addressing Council. Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the speaker’s rostrum, state his name and address for the record, state the subject he wishes to discuss, state whom he is representing if he represents an organizat ion or other persons, and, unless further time is otherwise specifically provided for in these rules or is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his remarks may comment for up to four three (43) minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No question shall be asked a Council Member or a member of the City staff without the permission of the Presiding Officer.

c) After Motion Close of Public Hearing . After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall address the Council from the audience on the matter under consideration without first securing permission to do so by the City Council.

Structured Discussion

Motion after public comment and prior to Council discussion can help focus Council discourse by identifying the issue to be decided. Accordingly, staff recommends the Council first solicit public input, and then make a motion , followed by Council discussion and a vote . This is the recommended process set forth in Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, which is a simplified version of Robert’s Rules of Order. Not only does this help identify the issue before the Council, but it ensures compliance with the Brown Act, which requires the public be provided an opportunity to speak prior to action being taken.

Paragraph 8 c) of the Rules and Procedures sets forth the procedure for consideration of Agenda Items. The proposed modifications are set forth below ( additions shown in italicized font; deletions in strikeout font):

8. Order of Business and Consideration and Sequence of Agenda Items.

c) The following shall be the procedure for consideration and sequence of each Agenda Item, including Public Hearings:

1. Mayor Introduces the Agenda Item

2. City Manager/Executive Director (or designee/Council Member) Presents Staff Report

3. Applicant/proponent, when appropriate, up to ten (10) minutes (at Presiding Officer’s discretion)

4. City Council Clarifying Technical Questions of Staff and Applicant/Proponent

5. Brief Council Comments and Motion Public Comments – up to a maximum of four three (43) minutes per person

6. Mayor Closes Public Hearing/Public Comments
3 7. Council Motion and Discussion

8. Council Vote

A summary of the public hearing process is also included on the draft Agenda.

Paragraph 13 g), “Limitation of Debate” provides, “No Council Member shall be allowed to speak more than once upon any particular subject until every other Council Member desiring to do so shall have spoken.” To enhance debate, and manage time more efficiently, some councils have adopted the rule that each person may speak twice on a given subject. This proposed modification is set forth below (additions shown in italicized font):

13. Rules of Debate.

g) Limitation of Debate. No Council Member shall be allowed to speak more than once upon any particular subject until every other Council Member desiring to do so shall have spoken. Council Members may speak twice on a given subject.

Meeting Preparation

To aid in meeting efficiency, questions of staff should be asked in advance. This saves Council time during the meeting, and for those questions that must be addressed at the meeting, enables staff to prepare to answer the questions accurately and succinctly. As a result, meetings run more smoothly, Council is p rovided the information needed for decision -making, and the need to continue items to the next agenda is minimized.

Minutes

Many public agencies have adopted action minutes, which record what is done at a meeting and not what is said. This is also the g uideline of Robert’s Rules of Order, which governs Council conduct. The time and effort required to prepare detailed minutes summarizing what was said , and their subjective nature, are time-consuming and the effort often exceeds the value to the City and to the public. This is not necessary given that Council meetings are recorded and available through AMP and YouTube. The proposed modification to the Rules is set forth below (additions shown in italicized font; deletions in strikeout font):

9. Preparation of Minutes . The City Cl erk shall have exclusive responsibility for preparation of the action minutes, and any directions for changes in the minutes shall be made only by majority action of the City Council.

CEQA:

Amendment of Resolution 80-71 is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not a “project” pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None identified.

4 CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and potential action.

Respectfully submitted,

___________________________
Heidi Quinn
Interim City Attorney
City of Marina

Attachments:

Exhibit A: Rules and Procedures, and Amendments
Exhibit B: Redlined and Integrated draft Agendas

5 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING RESOLUTION 80-71, AS AMENDED, PARAGRAPHS 8, 9, 13, AND 27, REGARDING BEST PRACTICES FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND MEETING EFFICIENCY.

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of December 12, 1980, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 80-71 Establishing the Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of Meetings of the City Council (“Rules and Procedures”); and

WHEREAS, the City Council previously amended the Rules and Procedures by adopting Resolution Nos. 85-1, 90-09, 91-17, 92-30, 94-15, 98-03, 99-01, 2001-106, 2009-41, 2011-32, 2011-33, 2011- 65, and 2019-107; and

WHEREAS, after discussion, the City Council directed staff to place on a future agenda a resolution to make proposed c hanges to the Rules and Procedures regarding public engagement and meeting efficiency; and

WHEREAS, staff proposes modifications to Paragraph 8 regarding Order of Business and Consideration and Sequence of Agenda Items, Paragraph 9 regarding Preparation o f Minutes, Paragraph 13 regarding Debate, and Paragraph 27 regarding Manner of Addressing Council; and amendment of the Agenda format; and

WHEREAS, amendment of Resolution 80-71, as amended, is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not a “project” pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Rules and Procedures. The Rules and Procedures shall be modified as follows (new language in italics and deleted language in strike-out text):

1. Paragraph 8 of the Rules and Regulations shall be modified as follows:

8. Order of Business and Consideration and Sequence of Agenda Items.

a) The business of the City Council shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the following order:

1. Call to Order 5:00p.m. (if there is to be a Closed Session)

2. Roll Call and Establishment of Quorum

3. Public Comments

4. Closed Session (if any)
Open Regular Session (6:30 p.m.) - Report Any Action taken in Closed Session

5. Moment of Silence & Pledge of Allegiance

6. Special Presentations - no action; no public comment

7. Special Council and Staff Announcements and Communications from the Floor

8. Public Comment – Up to a maximum of 3 minutes per person

9. Consent Agenda for Successor Agency (If any)

10. Consent Agenda

11. Public Hearings

12. Other Council Action Items of the Successor Agency

6 Resolution No. 2022-
Page Two

13. Other Action Items:

14. Council & Staff Informational Reports – no action taken, no public comment

15. Adjournment

b) The Mayor, at their his/her discretion and subject to majority vote overruling them him/her, may re-arrange agenda items, provided that any items ‘pulled’ from Item 98, “Consent Agenda” shall be considered following the last item of Item 1110, “Other Council Action Items.”

c) The following shall be the procedure for consideration and sequence of each Agenda Item, including Public Hearings:

1. Mayor Introduces the Agenda Item

2. City Manager/Executive Director (or designee/Council Member) Presents Staff Report

3. Applicant/proponent, when appropriate, up to ten (10) minutes (at Presiding Officer’s discretion)

4. City Council Clarifying Technical Questions of Staff and Applicant/Proponent

5. Brief Council Comments and Motion Public Comments – up to a maximum of four three (43) minutes per person

6. Mayor Closes Public Hearing/Public Comments

7. Council Motion and Discussion

8. Council Vote

2. Paragraph 9 of the Rules and Regulations shall be modified as follows:

9. Preparation of Minutes. The City Clerk shall have exclusive responsibility for preparation of the action minutes, and any directions for changes in the minutes shall be made only by majority action of the City Council.

3. Paragraph 13 of the Rules and Regulations shall be modified as follows:

13. Rules of Debate.

g) Limitation of Debate. No Council Member shall be allowed to speak more than once upon any particular subject until every other Council Member desiring to do so shall have spoken. Council Members may speak twice on a given subject.

4. Paragraph 27 of the Rules and Regulations shall be modified as follows:

27. Addressing the Council

a) Manner of Addressing Council. Each person desiring to address the Council shall step up to the speaker’s rostrum, state his name and address for the record, state the subject he wishes to discuss, state whom he is representing if he represents an organization or other persons, and, unless further time is otherwise specifically p rovided for in these rules or is granted by majority vote of the Council, shall limit his remarks may comment for up to four three (43) minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No question shall be a sked a Council Member or a member of the City staff without the permission of the Presiding Officer.

7 Resolution No. 2022-
Page Three

c) After Motion Close of Public Hearing . After a motion has been made or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall address the Counc il from the audience on the matter under consideration without first securing permission to do so by the City Council.

5. The Agenda format shall be in substantially the same form as Attachment 1 hereto.

Section 3. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect on immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held this 16th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_____________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

8 1 RESOLUTION NO. 80- 71
A 'RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR2
3 THE CONDUCT OF THE MEETINGS OF THE MARINA CITY COUNCIL 4 -oOo-
5 WHEREAS, in order to provide for continuity of responsibility 6 and to provide sufficient time and opportunity for full cons id er a" 7 8
orderly and expeditious conduct of council meetings, it is necessary9 10 and appropriate to adopt the following rules and procedures relat- 11 ing to the conduct of such meetings.
12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 13 of Marina, as follows:

The purpose of this resolution is to establish14 1. Purpose. s
the procedure for the presentation and determination of matters15 16 coming before the Marina City Council, to provide for the fair and efficient consideration of said matters, and to insure that the17 public is fully informed of the matters coming before the City18 - Council and has an opportunity to witness the deliberations of the19 members thereof in the conduct of public business, and that proper20 public involvement in the deliberations of -the council be encourage!.21 The City Council shall hold regular22 2.
23 of 7:30 o’clock p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 21124 Hillcrest Avenue in the City, or in such other place within the25 city limits to which said meeting may be adjourned.26 If by reason flood or other emergency it shall be unsafe to meet inxthe27 of fire, City Hall, the meetings may be held for the duration of the emer-28 tion and public discussion of important issues which the City Council must review and decide, and in order to provide for the I
I
1 Regular Meetings .
meetings on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the hour

EXHIBIT A
9 1
2 When the3
4 5 at the same hour on the following business day.
6 3. Study Sessions.
7 8 of 7:00 -o’clock p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, or at 9 such other place as may be determined by the Council , for the pur- 10 pose of hearing reports from the staff and reviewing, discussing 11 Such sessions shall
12 be
13 14 shall be deemed to prevent the taking of an informal vote on any 15 matter under discussion. The participation of the public in such i
16 sessions shall be subject to the discretion of the presiding office 17 Special Meetings.4.
18 19 delivering personally or by mail written notice to each Council 20 Member and to each local newspaper of general circulation, radio or 21 television station requesting notice in writing. Such notice must 22 be delivered personally or by mail at least twenty -four hours before 23 specified in the notice. The call and
24 notice shall specify the time and place of the speical meeting and 25 the business to be transacted. No other business shall be consider 26 ed at such meetings. Such written notice may be dispensed with as 27 28
Such
-2-
I
i
to any Council Member who at or prior to the time the meeting con venes files with the City Clerk a written waiver of notice. gency at such other place as is designated by the Mayor should fail to act, by three members of the City Council, day for any regular meeting falls on a legal holiday, no meeting shall be held on such holiday, but a regular meeting shall be held Special, meetings may be called at any
time by the Mayor, or by three members of the City Council, by open to the public and press.
taken at a. study session; provided, however, that nothing herein and debating matters of interest to the City.

No official action shall be
the time of such meeting as
The City Council shall meet in a study
session on the first and. third Tuesdays, of each month at the hour or, if he

EXHIBIT A
10 waiver may be given by telegram.1
2 the meeting at the time it convenes.3

5. Meetings to be Public - Exception for Executive Sessions.4 All regular and special meetings of the City Council shall be public5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 cussion which took place during said executive session unless the i 13 City Council shall authorize the disclosure of such information by14 majority vote.15
All reports, communications, ordinances, resolu-Agenda.16 6. tions, contract documents or other matters to be submitted to the 17 Council at a regular meeting shall be delivered to the City Clerk18 19 not later than 12:00 o'clock noon on the Wednesday preceding the meeting . The City Clerk shall prepare an agenda of all such20 matters according to the order of business (paragraph 8 hereinbelow) . 21 The agenda shall be delivered or otherwise made available to the22 Council Members on the Friday preceding the Tuesday Council meeting 23 24
later than 10:00 o'clock a.m. on the Monday preceding the meeting.25 All matters shall be considered by the Council in the order listed 26 on the agenda, to the extent of time available; provided, however,27 that the order of the agenda may be changed at -any time by the28 -3-
I
Such written notice may also be
dispensed with as to any Council Member who is actually present at provided, however, the City Council may hold executive sessions during a regular or special meeting, from which the public may be excluded, for the purpose of considering the matters referred to in §§54 957-54957.6 of the Government Code of the State of California.

No member of the City Council, employee of the City, or any to which it pertains, and shall be made available to the public no other person present during an executive session of the Council shall disclose to any person the content or substance of any dis-

EXHIBIT A
11 unanimous consent of all Council Members -then present at 1 2
3 foregoing policies. No matters other than those on the agenda 4 shall be finally acted upon by the Council; provided, however, that 5 6
7 if not acted upon at the Council meeting at which it is brought up, 8 with an explanation of the emergency other necessity for bring - 9 or
ing it up stated In open council meeting, may be placed upon the 10 agenda by a motion, seconded and carried, and then may be considered 11 and acted upon by the Council.12
Council Correspondence.7.13
Correspondence addressed to
Availability to the Public.a)14
the City Council which is received by the City Clerk or any other 15 officer or employee of the City shall not become a public record 16 until received and filed by the Council at regular, special or 17 a
adjourned meeting of the Council. Correspondence received in the 18 City Clerk's office or other offices after 12:00 o'clock noon on 19 the Wednesday preceding a regular Council meeting shall not be 20 placed on the agenda unless it concerns a matter to be considered 21 by the Council at the next regular meeting or is determined by the 22 Mayor or the City Manager to be an urgent matter which should be 23 Correspondence
24 25
majority vote of the Council.26
Authority of City Manager. The City Manager is authorized b}27
to open and examine all mail or other written communications 28 -4-
i
I
t
brought to the immediate attention of the Council.
shall not be read aloud at a Council meeting unless requested by a a matter deemed to be an emergency by any Council Member, the City a matter which would become moot
a meeting,
completed for lack of time shall
become agenda items at the following meeting in accordance with the Agenda ’ items not considered or
Manager or the City Attorney, or

EXHIBIT A
12 addressed to the city Council and to give it immediate attention1 to the end that all administrative business referred to in said2 communications and not necessarily requiring Council action may3 be acted upon between Council meetings.4

8. order of Business The business of the Council shall5 0 be taken up for consideration and disposition in the following6 order s7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 The order of business shall not be changed except by majority15 vote of the City Council .16
The City Clerk shall havePreparation of Minutes.9.17
exclusive responsibility for preparation of the minutes, and any18 directions for changes in the minutes shall be made only by19 majority action of the City Council.20
21 Reading of Minutes. Unless the reading of the minutes10. 22 of a Council meeting is ordered by a majority vote of the Council, such minutes may be approved without reading if the City Clerk has23 24 previously furnished each Council Member with a copy.

The Mayor shall be the PresidingPresiding Officer.25 11. 26 Officer at all meetings of the City Council. In the absence of 27 In the absencethe Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall preside. 28 of both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, the City Clerk shall call -5-
i
j
J

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation.

Roll Call.

Approval of the Minutes.

Communications from Floor Not on Agenda.

Special Presentations (if any) .

Consent Calendar Items „
Public Hearings.

Other Agenda Items - Consideration of
Ordinances and Resolutions
Council and Staff Reports.

Executive Sessions (if any) .

Adj ournment .

EXHIBIT A
13 1
2 3
4 5
6 12.
7 Participation-.a)
second (
8 debate and vote from the Chair.

Question to be Stated.b)9 The Presiding Officer or such 10 Follow-
11 12
carried or was defeated.13
may publicly explain the effect of a vote for the audience, or he 14 may direct a member of the City staff to do so, before. proceeding 15 16 to the next item of business
The Presiding Officer shall signS igning of Documents17 c) all ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and other documents neces- 18 sitating his signature which were adopted in his presence, unless 19 he is unavailable, in which case the signature of an alternate 20 Presiding Officer may be used.21
The Presiding Officer may require anySworn Testimony.22 d) person addressing the City Council to be sworn as a witness and to 23 testify under oath, and the Presiding Officer shall so require if 24 directed to do so by a majority vote of the Council.25 Rules’ of Debate.26 13.
a) Every Council Member desiring to
27 28
-6-
I
the Council to order, whereupon a temporary Presiding Officer shall be elected by the Council Members present to serve until the Powers and Duties of Presiding Officer.

The Presiding Officer may move,
arrival of the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore or until adjournment.

Wherever in this resolution the term Mayor is used, it shall apply equally to the Presiding Officer as defined in this section. member of the City staff as he may designate shall verbally restate each question immediately prior to calling for the vote. ing the vote the City Clerk shall announce whether the question The Presiding Officer in his discretion
Getting' the Floor.
speak shall first address the Chair, gain recognition by the

EXHIBIT A
14 *• . »**£» w* 4%
Presiding Officer, and shall confine himself to the question under1 debate, avoiding personalities and indecorous language.2 b) Questions to staff Every council Member de siring', to3 question the City staff shall f after recognition by the Presiding4 5 6 Attorney, or to such other department head or member 7 Interruptions > A Council Member, once recognized, shall8 not be interrupted when speaking unless called to order by the9 Presiding Officer, unless a point of order or personal privilege10 is raised by another Council Member, or unless the speaker chooses11 If a Council12
13 until the question of order is determined and, if determined to14 Members of the City staff, after15 be in order, may then proceed. recognition by the Presiding Officer, shall hold the floor until16 completion of their remarks or until recognition is withdrawn by17 18 the Presiding Officer.
19 The Presiding Officer shall determined) Points of Order. 20 all points of order subject to the right of any Councilman to 21 The Presiding Officer may consult withappeal to the Council. 22 the City Manager or the City Attorney in connection with deter - 23 24
25 26 sustained? ° A majority vote shall conclusively determine such 27 question of order.
28 Point of Personal Privilege. The right of a Councile) -7-
If an appeal is taken, the ques
tion shall be, "Shall the decision of the Presiding Officer be to yield to a question by another Council Member.

Member while speaking, is called to order, he shall cease speaking staff as may be appropriate,
c)
mining a point of order, or may refer the question involved to either one for determination.

Officer, address his questions to the City Manager, the City of the City

EXHIBIT A
15 1
2 motives are questioned or where the welfare of the Council is con- 3 corned. A Council Member raising a point of personal privilege 4 may interrupt another Council Member who has the floor only if the 5 Presiding Officer recognizes the privilege.6
f) Privilege of Closing Debate . The Council Member moving 7 the adoption of an ordinance, resolution or motion shall have the 8 privilege of closing debate.9
Limitation of Debate. Mo Council Member shall be allowedg)10 11 to speak more than once upon any particular subject until every other Council Member desiring to do so shall have spoken. 12 Ordinances, Resolution and Motions — Precedents ,

14.13 When any
ordinance, resolution or motion is properly brought before the 14 Council and seconded by another Council Member, no other action 15 shall be considered except a point of order, or a motion to adjourn 16 to table,17
Such items shall have precedence in the order stated in to amend.18
Points of order shall be ruled upon by the
the preceding sentence.19
Presiding Officer, provided that such ruling may be overridden by 20 a majority of the Council. All of such motions, except motions to 21 amend,22
majority.23
Any of the foregoing motions shall be in order at any time the 24 speaker is duly recognized, except when repeated without interven - 25 ing business or discussion, or if made when the motion to close 26 debate has been adopted or while a vote is being taken.27 If a motion to table (without timeMotion to Table »28 a) -8-
I
i
to table to a certain time, to close debate, to refer or Member to address the Council on a question of personal privilege shall be limited to cases in which his integrity, character or shall be put to a vote without debate and decided by a

EXHIBIT A
16 1 certain) passes, consideration of the matter may be resumed only upon the motion of a member voting with the majority on the motion2 3 to table.

Motion to Close Debate.b)4 When a motion to close debate is duly made and seconded, there shall be no further debate.5 If the 6 question carries, the Presiding Officer shall put pending amendments 7 to a vote, without debate, in the inverse order of their introduce 8 tion before putting the main, question. If the question is decided 9 negatively, the main question and its amendments remain before the 10 council .
11 Providing that no intervening rightsc) Reconsideration . 12 will be prejudiced, any council Member who voted with the majority 13 on a question may move the reconsideration of that question at the 14 same meeting in which the original decision was made or at the next following meeting. After a motion for reconsideration has been actc d15 16 upon, no other similar motion shall be made without unanimous consert. 17 15 . Voting .
18 ordinance or to adopt a resolution or motion granting a franchise oi authorizing the payment or expenditure of money or incurring of a19 i
debt. The majority of a quorum is required to adopt other resolu-20 21 tions or motions . A "majority” refers to a majority of the quorum 22 present.
23 Every ordinance shall be adopted by a roll call vote. All 24 other matters may be referred to a vote unless a roll call is On all matters for which a voice25 requested by any Council Member. ! 26 Objectionsvote is authorized, the Presiding Officer may ask for. 27 to the question?” . If no objection is expressed, the Presiding 28 Officer shall.
i
~9~
Three affirmative votes are required to enact an
"so order," and the minutes shall record a unanimous

EXHIBIT A
17 vote in favor.1
roll call vote shall be called in the normal manner.2

16. Failure to Vote. Every Council Member should vote unless3 disqualified by reason of a conflict of interest. A Council Mem-4 ber who abstains from voting in effect consents that a majority of5 the quorum may decide the question voted upon.6

17. Silerice Constitutes Af f irnlative Vo t e . Unless a member7 of the Council states that he is not voting r his silence shall be8 recorded as an affirmative vote.9
Tie Vote.18. Tie votes shall be lost motions and may be10 5reconsidered.11
i
Changing Vote.19. A member may change his vote only if he12 makes a timely request to do so immediately following the announce-13 ment of the vote by the City Clerk and prior to the time that the14 A Council Membernext item in the order of business is taken up-15 16 i
particular matter shall not subsequently be allowed to withdraw17 his abstention.18
Disqualification for Conflict of Interest.20. Any Council19 20 21 reason
Presiding Officer state the nature of such disqualification in22 Where no clearly disqualifying conflict of interestopen meeting.23 • appears, the matter of disqualification may, at the request of the24 Council Member affected, be decided by the other Council Members25 A Council Member who is disqualified byor the City Attorney.36 reason of a conflict in interest in any matter shall not remain in27 his seat during the debate and vote on such matter, but shall28 -10-
Member who is disqualified from voting on a particular matter by of a conflict of interest shall publicly state or have the who publicly announces that he is abstaining from voting on a Xf any Council Member objects to the procedure, a

EXHIBIT A
18 * . WTe. K V.*.. -A J ,,.«i.n„‘A*K>V<
1 request and be given the permission of the Presiding Officer to i
2 step down from the Council table. A Council Member stating such 3 disqualification shall not be counted as a part of a quorum and 4 shall be considered absent for the purpose of determining the 5 outcome of any vote on such matter.
6 21. Remarks of Council Member and Synopsis of Debate. A 7 Council Member may request through the Presiding Officer the privilege of having an abstract of his statement on any subject8 under consideration by the Council entered in the minutes.9 If the 10 11 minutes .
12 Any Council Member shall22. Protest Against Cou n c i 1 Action . 13 have the right to have the reasons for his dissent from, or protesi 14 against, any action of the Council entered in the minutes. Such 15 dissent or protest to be entered in the minutes shall be made in 16 the following manner: "I would like the minutes to show that I am 17 Except as otherwise provided in this18 Rules of Order.23. 19 resolution, other rules adopted by the City Council or applicable 20 provisions of State law, the procedures of the Council shall be 21 governed, to the extent applicable, by the latest revised edition 22 of Robert 1s Rules of Order .
23 24. Failure to Observe Rules of Order. Rules adopted to ‘ expedite the transaction of the business of the Council in an24 25 orderly fashion are deemed to be procedural only and the failure 26 to strictly observe 'such rules shall not affect the jurisdiction 27 28 otherwise held in conformity with law.
-11-
i
I
I
i
ot the Council or invalidate any action taken at a meeting that is Council consents thereto, such statement shall be entered in the opposed to this action, for the following reasons..."

EXHIBIT A
19 »w.

25. Ordinances/ Resolutions and Contracts .1
All ordinances shall be prepared by the City Attorney.a)2 i
No ordinance shall be prepared for presentation to the Council3 unless ordered by4
the Mayor T or city Manager, or prepared by the city Attorney on5 his own initiative. •6
b) All ordinances.7
8 Council, have been approved as to form and legality by the City9 Attorney and shall have been examined and approved for administrate tion by the City Manager or his authorized representative.11 Reading of Ordinances and Resolutions. At the time of26.12 13 t
unless, after the reading of the title thereof, the further reading14 thereof is waived by unanimous consent of the Council Members15 16 present . statement by the
Presiding Officer that "if there is no objection, the further17 reading of the ordinance or resolution shall be waived".18 If any Council Member so requests. the ordinance ox resolution shall be19 read in full.• 20

27. Addressing' the Council.21
a) Manner of Addressing Council. Rach person desiring to22 address the Council shall step up to the speaker’s rostrum, state23 his name and address for the record, state the subject he wishes to24 discuss, state whom he is representing if he represents an organize- -25 26 tion or other persons, and, unless further time is otherwise speci fically provided for in these rules or is granted by majority vote27 of the Council, shall limit his remarks to three (3) minutes.28 All -12-
A
Prior Approval by Administrative Staff.
resolutions and contract documents shall, before presentation to thk a majority vote of the Council, or requested by
Such consent may be expressed by a
adoption of an ordinance or a resolution, it shall be read in full

EXHIBIT A
20 1 remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to 2 No question shall be asked a Council Memberany member thereof. 3 member of the City staff without the permission of the Presid- 4 ing Officer.

In order to expedite5 Spokesman for Group of persons-b) matters and to avoid repetitious presentations, whenever any group6 7 of persons wishes to address the Council on the same subject 8 Presiding Officer to requestmatter, -it shall be proper for the that a spokesman be chosen by the group to address the Council and,9 in case additional information or matters are to be presented by10 the number of suchany other member of said group, to limit11 12 persons addressing the Council.

After a motion has been made or a publicAfter Motion.13 c} 14 15
out first securing permission to do so by the City Council :16 17 Rules of Decorum.28.

While the Council is in session, the18 a) Council Members. members must preserve order and decorum, and a member shall neithea19 20 21
refuse to obey the orders of the Presiding Officer.22 or Members of the City staff and employees23 Employees .b) shall observe the same rules of order and decorum as are applicable24 25 to the City Council.

Any person making irnper -26 Persons Addressing the Council.c) tinent, slanderous or profane remarks, or who becomes boisterous27 while addressing the Council, shall be called to order by the28 -13-
f
i
I
by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council nor disturb any member while speaking or a
hearing has been closed,
Council from the audience on the matter under consideration with- no member of the public shall address the

EXHIBIT A
21 Presiding Officer and, if such conduct continues, may at the dis-1 cretion of the Presiding Officer be barred from further audience2 before the Council during that meeting, unless permission to con-3 4 tinue be granted by
Any person in the audience whod) Members of the Audience.5 engages in disorderly conduct such as hand clapping, stamping of6 feet, whistling, using profane language, yelling, and similar7 demonstrations, which conduct disturbs the peace and good order of8 the meeting, or who refuses to comply with the lawful orders of the9 Presiding Officer, shall be guilty of an infraction, and upon10 instructions from the Presiding Officer, it shall be the duty of the11 Sergeant at Arms to remove any -such person from the Council Chamber12 and to place him under arrest or otherwise cause him to be prosecuted13 under the law.14
The Director of Public Safety29. Enforcement of Decorum.15 16 or such member or members of the Public Safety Department as he may designate, shall be Sergeant at Arms of the City Council and17 I shall carry out all orders given by the Presiding Officer for the18 purpose of maintaining order and decorum at the Council meetings.19 Any Council Member may. move to require the Presiding Officer to20 enforce the rules, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the21 22 Public Hearings. The following rules shall apply to all30.23 •public hearings, except when proceedings are held under general24 laws of the State of California which require different procedures.25 26 a) The Mayor shall state the subject matter of the hearing 27 Before doing so, he mayand declare the public hearing open. 28 determine whether or not there are proponents or opponents who wish -14-
a majority of the Council.

Council shall require him to do so.

EXHIBIT A
22 to make presentations, how many persons wish to be heard, or other1 matters which may affect the conduct of the proceedings.2 He may impose and announce reasonable time limits on presentations or oral3 arguments by the public -4
b) The City Manager or appropriate5 staff member shall give a factual summary of the matter.6
c) The proponents shall be heard. (Written correspondence7 shall be summarized by the Clerk. )8
d) The (Written correspondenceopponents shall be heard.9 shall be summarized by the Clerk.)10
reasonable time for rebuttal.e) Each side shall be given11 a Additional speakers must limit their remarks to providing new infox12 mation that was not already covered by other speakers.13 f) Prior to the close of the public heaaring, the Mayor shall14 give those persons wishing to place their names on the record as15 i being for or against, without presenting an oral argument,16 an opportunity to do so.17
g) The public hearing shall be declared closed -18
The Council shall discuss and determine the matter.h)19 After the public hearing is closed, the public shall noti)20 be recognized to speak except to answer any question not covered21 in the public hearing, and provided that whenever any such answer22 is given, the opposing side shall be given23
24 31.25
the 'City Council that any member of the public wishing to be heard26 matter under consideration by the City Council shall be given27 on a Prior to the vote on any issue28
-15-
*
i
a reasonable opportunity to do so.
an opportunity to
- present facts in rebuttal of the answer given.

Policy on Public Input. It is the declared policy of

EXHIBIT A
23 I
1 the Mayor shall determine whether or not anyone present wishes to 2 be heard. The Mayor may establish reasonable time limits for oral 3 presentations and shall limit the presentation to the matter before 4 the City Council at that time.
5 32. Absences from Council Meetings. Pursuant to Government 6 Code §36513, if a City Council Member is absent without permission 7 from all regular Council meetings for 60 days consecutively from 8 the last regular meeting he attended, his office becomes vacant anc shall be filled by the Council as any other vacancy. In addition,9 should any Council Member be absent from two (2)10 consecutive 11 regular Council meetings, or from three (3) regular Council meetinc s 12 in any six -mon th period, without permission from (i.e., not excusec the Council, the Council may determine that the13 for good cause by) 14 15
I
16 zed by vote of the Council.

Unless otherwise adjourned, all17 Automatic Ad j ournmen t .33. meetings of the City Council shall automatically be adjourned at18 10:00 o’clock p.m. , except that a majority may extend the automa-19 tic adjournment to 10:30 o'clock p.m., and adjournment may be20 further postponed only by unanimous consent to adjourn not later21 than a specified time.22
These rules may be amended by theAmendment of Rules.34.23 • Council by an affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum; provided24 however , that where a provision of these rules require action by25 26 quorum, then an amendment to that rule requires the same vote re-27 quired for the rule proposed, to be amended.28
-16-
resignation, and may request such resignation in a
a specific affirmative vote which is greater than a majority of a best interests of the City would be served by said Council Member's letter author i-

EXHIBIT A
24 1 The prior resolution ofPrior Resolution Repealed.35. 2 this Council relating to Council meeting procedures,, being Resolu tion No. 76-1, is hereby repealed.3
4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina 5 at a regular council meeting duly held on December 2r 1980, by 6 the following vote:
7 AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS:
8 9 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
10 11 NoneABSENT : COUNCIL MEMBERS:
12 13
Robert T. Ouye, Mayor
14 15
16 17 . Flautt, City Clerk
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 -17-
Davis, Bird, Laden, Takahashi and
Mayor Ouye
-7 I
4/
ATTEST :/)

EXHIBIT A
25 RESOLUTION NO. 85-1
1 2 -oOo-
3 4
5 i
6 December ’2, 1980, is hereby amended as follows:
i7 8.
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 ! O .• ••li&r-
15 16
17 18
Counci Imembers :AYES,
19 20 Councilmembers: NoneNOES,
21 i
Councilmembers : NoneABSENT,
22 23
/ / /MAYOR
24 25
26 27
28 i
!
I
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the City. Council of the City of Marina, as follows:

A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 80-71 ESTABLISHING RULES

AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE MEETING OF THE

MARINA CITY COUNCIL

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. i o
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes
Presentations
Communications from the Floor (Not on the Agenda)
Council and Staff Reports
Correspondence
Consent Calendar
Publid Hearings
Other Agenda Items
Executive Session
Adjournment
Ayers , Blake , Ouye , Kosorek
and Mayor Takahashi

ORDER OF BUSINESS
The business of the Council shall be taken up for
consideration and dispostion in the following order:

ATTEST:
^CITY CLE^K/

1. That Resolution No. .80-71 entitled "A Resolution
Establishing Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of the Meetings of the Marina City. Council",’ passed and adopted on PASSED AND ADOPTED at a. regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on January 8, 1985, by the following vote:

EXHIBIT A
26 RESOLUTION NO. 91-09
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina,IT as That Resolution No.
is hereby amended as

8. ORDER OF BUSINESS
for
J
Perrine andCOUNCIL MEMBERS:AYES,
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NoneNOES,
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NoneABSENT,
EDITH JOHNSEN, Mayor
ATTEST ;
(Merk
BE
follows :

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

1. 2.

3. 4.

A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 85-1 ESTABLISHING RULES AND

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE MEETING OF THE

MARINA CITY COUNCIL
Takali, Yates, Horning,
Mayor Johnsen
Call to order
Roll Call & Establishment of Quorum
Closed Session
Pledge of Allegiance & Words of Inspiration/Moments of
Silence
Communications From The Floor
Special Presentations
Consent Agenda (includes Approval of Minutes)
Public Hearings
Other Council Action Items
Council & Staff Informational Reports
Correspondence
Adjournment

1. That Resolution No. 85-1 entitled "A Resolution Establishing Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of the Meetings of the Marina City Council:, passed and adopted on January 8, 1985,
follows:

The business of the Council shall be taken up
consideration and disposition in the following order:

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on the 5th day of February, 1991, by the following vote:

EXHIBIT A
27 RESOLUTION NO. 91-17
1 v.-’J 2
3 as4
5 6
7 8. ORDER OF BUSINESS8
9 10
11 12
!13
14 15
ft
*
16 17
18 19 AYES,
20 NOES, NoneCOUNCIL MEMBERS:21
ABSENT , COUNCIL MEMBERS: None22
23 EDITH JOHNSEN, Mayor24 ATTEST :
25 UNSg£/ City OlerkJ P,26
27 28
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
and Mayor Johnsen
i

1. 2.

3. 4.

Cl-

7. 8.
.— 9.

10. 11.

12. Call to order
Roll Call & Establishment of Quorum
Closed Session
Pledge of Allegiance & Words of Inspiration/Moments
of Silence
Special Presentations
Communications From The Floor
Public Hearings
Other Council Action Items
Consent Agenda (includes Approval of Minutes)
Council & Staff Informational Reports
Correspondence
Adjournment
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on the 19th day of March, 1991, by the following vote:

A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 91-09 ESTABLISHING RULES AND

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE MEETING OF THE
>'• MARINA CITY COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina, follows :

The business of the Council shall be taken up for
consideration and disposition in the following order:

1. That Resolution No. 91-09 entitled "A Resolution
Establishing Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of the Meetings of the Marina City Council:, passed and adopted on February 5, 1991, is hereby amended as follows:

Takali, Yates, Horning, Perrine

EXHIBIT A
28 1
2 RESOLUTION NO. 92-30
3 4
5 6
7 That Resolution No. 91-17 entitled ”A Resolution Amending 8 9
ORDER OF BUSINESS8.
10 f
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
1992, by the
21 AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:22
23 24
25 EDITH JOI
ATTEST :26
27 28
I1.

2. 3.

4. i
>
JUNSAY^/city (fclerk
NOES,

ABSENT,
Call to order
Roll Call & Establishment of Quorum
Closed Session
Pledge of Allegiance & Words of Inspiration/Moments
of Silence
Special Presentations
Communications From The Floor
Special Announcements
Public Hearings
Other Council Action Items
Consent Agenda (includes Approval of Minutes)
Council & Staff Informational Reports
Correspondence
Adj ournment
COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Takali, Yates, Horning, Perrine
and Mayor Johnsen.

None
None
I

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. IN, Mayor
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on the 3rd day of June,
following vote:

A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 91-17 ESTABLISHING RULES AND

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE MEETING OF THE

MARINA CITY COUNCIL

1. Resolution 91-09 Establishing Rules and Procedures for the Conduct of the Meetings of the Marina City Council”, passed and adopted on March 19, 1991, is hereby amended as follows:

The business of the Council shall be taken up for
consideration and disposition in the following order:

Q
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina, as follows :

EXHIBIT A
29 RESOLUTION NO. 94-15
1980,

2. shall
each month at the hour of
i

8. ORDER OF BUSINESS.

REPORT ON ANY ACTION

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

1. 2.

3. 4.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-71 AND 92-30

RELATING TO THE HOURS OF REGULAR MEETINGS AND

THE ORDER OF BUSINESS
on
on
emergency at such other place as is
the Mayor or,
members of the City Council,
regular meeting falls
meeting shall be held
regular meeting shall be held at the same hour
the following business day.

Section 2, entitled “Regular
2, 1980, is hereby
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Marina, as follows :

The business of the council shall be taken up for
consideration and disposition in the following
order :

CALL TO ORDER 6:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM

CLOSED SESSION

OPEN REGULAR SESSION -

TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & MOMENT OF SILENCE

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE FLOOR

CONSENT AGENDA

PUBLIC HEARINGS

OTHER COUNCIL ACTIONS ITEMS

COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS

CORRESPONDENCE

ADJOURNMENT
Regular Meeting The City Council shall hold
regular meetings on the first and third Tuesday of
6:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 211 Hillcrest Avenue in
the City, or in such other place within the city
limits to which said meeting may be adjourned. If
by reason of fire, flood or other emergency it
shall be unsafe to meet in the City Hall, the
meetings may be held for the duration of the
designated by
if he should fail to act, by three
When the day for any
a legal holiday, no
such holiday, but a
on

1. That Resolution No. 80-71,
Meetings” passed and adopted on December
amended as follows:

2. That Resolution No. 92-30 amending the Order of Business passed and adopted June 3, 1992, is hereby amended as follows:

EXHIBIT A
30 94-15
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
o
ATTEST :

I
!
i
NOES,

ABSENT,
Resolution No.

April 7, 1994