Marina City Council
May 20, 2025

Projected Subsidy/Sales Tax
Revenue Sharing Payment
from City to Developer
1st 12-month Operating Year $468,000
2nd Operating Year $562,000
3rd Operating Year $674,000
4th Operating Year $809,000
5th Operating Year $970,000
Cumulative 5-Yr. Total $3,482,000

4. A statement of the public purposes for the economic development subsidy.

The proposed Agreement is consistent with City’s economic development goals and objectives. Specifically, the following public purposes are achieved:

 The City has determined that the Dealership is an important catalyst for the continued development of the Dunes Project and that the Dealership will provide substantial direct and indirect benefits to the City and economic opportunities, including sales tax revenues, increased property tax revenues, and increased jobs in the region. It will enhance the City’s position as a regional retail and commercial destination and serve as a catalyst for additional retail and commercial development.

• The tax revenues to be generated by the Dealership to the City will be used to fund City services, from public safety to operating recreational facilities and programs.

 The Dealership will diversify the City of Marina’s economic base by being the City’s first automobile dealership to sell new vehicles. The Dealership will sell and provide service for Mercedes-Benz ICE passenger cars, EQ electric vehicles, Sprinter ICE commercial vans, and E-Sprinter electric commercial vans. The dealership will also be one of only 50 Mercedes-Benz dealerships in the Country that will receive an allocation of Mercedes-Benz AMG model vehicles. By being the first luxury automotive franchise in Marina, it also has the potential to attract other luxury franchises and new businesses to Marina.

 The Dealership will bring clients to Marina from a large geographic area, extending from Santa Cruz to the North, Fresno to the East, and Carmel to the South. The customers will be introduced to Marina’s world-class recreational areas as well as shopping and dining opportunities and new residential offerings at the Dunes.

EXHIBIT C
26 \\sf-fs2\SFEmployee\dkern\My Documents\marina\strategy 03 25\Mercedes\Revised Subsidy Report 05 16 25.docx

5. The projected tax revenue to the local agency as a result of the economic development subsidy.

The dealership will generate significant annual tax revenue to the City of Marina. As shown in the following chart, total taxable revenues to be directly generated by the Dealership are anticipated to total $882,000 during the first operating year and increase to $1.76 million by the fifth operating year. Cumulate tax revenues generated during the Dealership’s first five operating years to the City of Marina net of the subsidy payments to the Developer are estimated to total $6.42 million.

Projected Tax Revenues to be Generated by Mercedes-Benz Dealership to the City of Marina
12-Month
Operating Year
of Dealership
1% Base Sales Tax
Levy (Apply to
Total Taxable
Sales), Net of 50%
share to Developer
Measure N

1.5% Tax
(Apply to
Parts Sales)
Gross
Receipts Tax
(.2% of Gross
Receipts)
VLF
Property Tax
Revenue
Total New
Annual Direct
City
Tax Revenues
1st Year $468,000 $145,000 $203,000 $66,000 $882,000
2nd Year $562,000 $174,000 $244,000 $67,000 $1,047,000
3rd Year $674,000 $209,000 $293,000 $69,000 $1,245,000
4th Year $809,000 $251,000 $352,000 $70,000 $1,482,000
5th Year $970,000 $301,000 $422,000 $71,000 $1,764,000
Cumulative 5-
Year Total $3,483,000 $1,080,000 $1,514,000 $343,000 $6,420,000

Marina’s 1.5% Measure N Tax will also apply to the sale of automobiles. However, this tax revenue is received by the buyer’s jurisdiction of residence. Given that Marina represents a relatively small fraction of the population within the Dealership’s trade area, for purposes of this analysis, no Measure N revenues from the sale of automobiles have been included in the calculation of projection tax revenues to Marina.

The Dealership’s sales are also anticipated to increase the City’s share of the County-wide pool of sales/use tax revenue generated by on-line sales. It is estimated that Marina could annually receive an additional $100,000 to over $300,000 of revenue from the Count-pool of sales/use tax. The actual amount to be generated will be driven by several factors, including the size of the County-wide pool of tax revenue and the relative amount of taxable sales generated by each jurisdiction within the County.

6. The estimated number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by full-time, part-time, and temporary positions.

EXHIBIT C
27 \\sf-fs2\SFEmployee\dkern\My Documents\marina\strategy 03 25\Mercedes\Revised Subsidy Report 05 16 25.docx

The Dealership anticipates employing 80 full-time employees during the first operating year and increasing employment annually as sales grow; the Dealership expects to employ over 150 full- time employees by its fifth operating year due to the projected increase in sales volumes.

EXHIBIT C
28 May 15, 2025 Item No: 13b

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 20, 2025

CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE A PRESENTATION REGARDING THE
STATUS OF THE CITY’S CITY -WIDE INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT
(ITP) FOR MONTEREY GILIA AND FORT ORD HABITAT

MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE PROJECTS FROM DENISE
DUFFY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PROVIDE INPUT ON A

CONCEPTUAL REALIGNMENT OF THE PROPOSED DEL MONTE
BOULEVARD/2ND AVENUE EXTENSION , TO CONSIDER ADOPTING
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-, APPROVING CHANGE ORDERS TO AMEND

THE EXISTING PROJECT AGREEMENTS TO EXTEND THE

TIMEFRAME FOR BOTH CONTRACTS AND INCLUDE ADDITIONAL

SERVICES IN THE ITP CONTRACT , AND AUTHORIZING THE

FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND

BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY,

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving a presentation regarding the status of the City’s City -Wide Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for Monterey Gilia and Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance Projects.

2. Providing input on a conceptual realignment of the proposed Del Monte Boulevard/2 nd Avenue Extension.

3. Adopting Resolution No. 20 25- , approving change orders to amend the existing project agreements with Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc . to extend the timeframe for both contracts and include additional services in the ITP contract , and authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the city, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance
The U.S. Army’s decision to close and dispose of the Fort Ord military base was considered a major federal action that could affect listed species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). In 1993, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) issued a Biological Opinion (BO) on the disposal and reuse of former Fort Ord requiring that a Habitat Management Plan be developed and implemented to reduce the incidental take of listed species and loss of habitat that supports these species. As a result, the U.S. Army prepared the Installation-Wide Multispecies Habitat Management Plan for Former Fort Ord, California (HMP) in 1997. The Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) was in the process of preparing a Fort Ord Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to support the issuance of base -wide incidental take permits, which incorporated the habitat requirements of the HMP. However, the base -wide permitting effort was discontinued, and the 1 Fort Ord HCP is no longer proposed. As a result, the Service requested that the local jurisdictions initiate the steps necessary to comply with the approved HMP. The City is responsible for four Habitat Management Areas (HMAs), including the Salinas River, Airport, Northwest Corner, and Landfill HMAs. In accordance with the requirements described in the HMP and the deed restrictions for the parcels, a Resource Management Plan (RMP) must be prepared and implemented.

On December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -157 approving an Agreement with Denise Duffy & Associates , Inc. (DD&A) to provide biological consulting services to develop an RMP. The RMP will bring the City into compliance with deed restrictions and federal agency requirements to manage the City’s HMAs to mitigate for development on former Fort Ord.

On April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -26 approving Amendment No. 1 to the DD&A Agreement, which provided for focused botanical surveys within the four habitat management areas to better inform management recommendations from the initial scope of work.

At the City Council meeting on December 17, 2024, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, including an updated timeline for completion.

City-Wide Incidental Take Permit for Monterey Gilia
The City currently owns a number of parcels on the former Fort Ord that were deeded to the City by the U.S. Army as economic conveyances in the closure of the former base that allow for development for commercial/residential purposes, which are known or have the potential to support occurrences of Monterey gilia ( Gilia tenuiflora spp. arenaria). Monterey gilia is a threatened species listed under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and an endangered species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Impacts to this plant species from potential future development activities in these parcels would require an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) in accordance with Section 2081(b) of the CESA.

Therefore, on December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -157 approving an agreement with DD&A to provide biological consulting services to assist the City in acquiring a City-Wide ITP from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to authorize the incidental take of Monterey gilia that may result from the implementation of future planned development on City lands on the former Fort Ord.

On April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -26 approving Amendment No. 1 to the DD&A Agreement, which provided for additional surveys for this species.

On December 7, 2021, the City Council held an informational and public input session regarding the prioritization of conservation and development areas to inform the mitigation strategy for the City-Wide ITP for Monterey gilia. The City Council requested that options be prepared and brought back to the council and public for discussion. In response to that request, City staff and DD&A held an in -person community workshop presenting the data and various options to the public and held a study session at a special City Council meeting on December 11 and 13, 2022, respectively. The public and City Council supported focusing development opportunities within the Airport Business Park Area , Future Cypress Knolls Development Area, and Marina Northwest Corner HMA for the Del Monte Boulevard Extension and focusing conservation within the remaining study areas, as shown in “EXHIBIT A”. 2 At the City Council meeting on December 17, 2024, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, including recent input from the resource agencies and an updated timeline for completion.

ANALYSIS:

Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance
As described above, the City is required to develop a RMP to identify the habitat management activities required in the four HMAs within the City’s jurisdiction. The development of the RMP has taken more time than anticipated. The Agreement with DD&A expired on June 30, 2022, and needs to be extended until June 30, 2027, to complete the work. Therefore, Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord HMP Compliance is proposed to extend the agreement until June 30, 2027, as shown in “EXHIBIT B” to the attached Resolution.

Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for City-Wide Incidental Take Permit for Monterey Gilia As described above, the City will need to acquire an ITP from CDFW to authorize the incidental take of Monterey gilia that would result from future development projects on City lands in the former Fort Ord, as shown in “EXHIBIT A.” DD&A is requesting a second amendment to the Agreement with the City to:

• extend the expiration of the contract,
• correct a clerical error related to the total budget stated in Amendment No. 1 issued April 9, 2021, and
• increase the budget to include additional tasks.

Extend Contract
Through efforts in Task 1, it became evident that additional tasks were necessary to adequately complete the work efforts identified in the task, and as a result, Task 1 has taken more time than anticipated. The Agreement with DD&A expired on June 30, 2022, and needs to be extended until June 30, 2027, to complete the work. Therefore, Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for City-Wide ITP is proposed to extend the agreement until June 30, 2027, as shown in “EXHIBIT C” to the attached Resolution.

Correct Budget Total in Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 1 was issued on April 9, 2021, and authorized DD&A to complete additional surveys for Monterey gilia for a not -to-exceed cost of $10,000. However, the amount of the contracted budget was stated incorrectly in the staff report and the amendment. The approved budget for the contract is $48,944.50 (as approved by City Council on December 15, 2020, and agreement executed on December 18, 2020, per Resolution 2020 -157). Amendment No. 1 incorrectly states that the approved budget is $28,989 (which was the draft total budget prior to Council requesting additional tasks at the December 15, 2020, meeting). Therefore, Amendment No. 1 should be corrected to state the accurate total budget of $58,944.50 , as shown in “EXHIBIT C” to the attached Resolution.

Additional Tasks
As described above, additional tasks were identified as necessary and completed during Task 1, which were out -of-scope, and the City authorized DD&A to utilize the existing budget to complete them. The additional out-of-scope tasks are detailed in “EXHIBIT C” to the attached Resolution.

3 DD&A exhausted the existing budget completing these tasks. Therefore, DD&A is requesting an amendment to complete the tasks identified in the Agreement, and proposing to include additional species in the ITP per the recommendations of the resource agencies. As a result, the identified tasks will require more effort, as well as more public participation. The additional work proposed is summarized below and detailed in “EXHIBIT C” to the attached Resolution.

Task 1. Mitigation Strategy Proposal
This task will be augmented to include the following additional species:
• burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), candidate species for listing under CESA • Crotch bumble bee ( Bombus crotchii , CBB), candidate species for listing under CESA
• western bumble bee ( Bombus occidentalis, WBB), candidate species for listing under CESA
• seaside bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus rigidus ssp. littoralis), state endangered species

Including these additional species will require developing mitigation strategies for each species, public outreach, and meetings.

In addition, this task will include conducting a site assessment in accordance with the “Interim Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for Determining Presence or a Negative Finding of the California Tiger Salamander” issued by the USFWS and CDFW in October 2003. California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense, CTS) is a federal threatened species and state threatened species. If it is determined that CTS has the potential to occur on City -owned lands within the former Fort Ord, the City may be required to obtain a federal and state ITP for impacts to this species. If it is determined a federal and state ITP will be required, an amendment to the Agreement will be requested for the additional work.

DD&A will continue the coordination effort and analysis related to the potential realignment of Del Monte Boulevard/2nd Avenue Extension, FORTAG, and General Plan 2045 Update.

This task will include additional City, resource agency, community, and City Council meetings.

Task 2. Prepare ITP Application
This task will be augmented to include the additional species identified in Task 1 in the ITP application and additional City, resource agency, community, and City Council meetings.

Task 3. ITP Conditions
This task will be augmented to include the additional species identified in Task 1 in the ITP application and additional City, resource agency, community, and City Council meetings.

Task 4. City Council Meetings
In addition to the City Council meetings proposed during Tasks 1 -3, this task will be augmented to include two additional City Council meetings.

4 The current cost of the Agreement for the City-Wide Section 2081 ITP cost is $ 58,944.50 (as corrected). The increased contract cost of these services is estimated not to exceed $156,150.50.

The proposed revised scope of work and budget contained in “Exhibit C” would supersede the existing Agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

When FORA closed its doors on June 30, 2020, funding that had been dedicated to habit at conservation planning efforts were divided and transferred to the land use jurisdictions with HMP responsibilities. Fund 223 currently contains a balance of approximately $1,300,000.

The Change Order No. 1 to this Agreement contained in “EXHIBIT A” includes a not -to- exceed additional $18,500, bringing the total contact cost to $222,670 . Therefore, Fund 223 has adequate funding capacity to cover the estimated contract costs

The Agreement for Professional Services to assist the City in acquiring an ITP in compliance with Section 2081 ITP, including Change Order No. 1, was approved with an appropriation of $58,944.50 (as corrected) from Fund 223. The Change Order No. 2 to this Agreement contained in “EXHIBIT C” includes a not-to-exceed additional amount of $156,150.50, bringing the total contact cost to $215,095. Also appropriated in Resolution No. 2020-157 was funds for a CDFW ITP Application fee of $32,669.75. However, the fee has increased and assuming application submittal occurs in 2025, the current fee is $47,012.50. Total project costs , including Change Order No. 2 and CDFW fee is $262,107.50.

With the Fund 223 balance of approximately $1,300,000, there are sufficient funds to appropriate to this project. Should there be additional costs necessary, staff will return to the City Council to request further spending authorization.

There are no fiscal impacts associated with Change Order No 2. to the Agreement for Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance as it only involves a contract extension.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for the City Council consideration and approval.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Guido Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

___________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

5 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-,

APPROVING CHANGE ORDERS TO AMEND THE EXISTING PROJECT

AGREEMENTS TO EXTEND THE TIMEFRAME FOR BOTH CONTRACTS AND

INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SERVICES IN THE ITP CONTRACT, AND

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY

ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY,

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, the U.S. Army’s decision to close and dispose of the Fort Ord military base was considered a major federal action that could affect listed species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). In 1993, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a biological opinion in accordance with Section 7 of the ESA requiring that a habitat management plan be developed and implemented to reduce the incidental take of listed species and loss of habitat that supports these species. The Installation-Wide Multispecies Habitat Management Plan for Former Fort Ord (HMP) was prepared to assess impacts on vegetation and wildlife resources, and provide mitigation for their loss associated with the remediation, disposal, and reuse of former Fort Ord; and,

WHEREAS, with the closure of FORA the City is responsible for four Habitat Management Areas (HMAs) including the Salinas River, Airport, Northwest Corner, and Landfill HMAs. In accordance with the requirements described in the Fort Ord HMP and the deed restrictions for the parcels, a Resource Management Plan (RMP) must be prepared and implemented by the City; and,

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -157 approving Agreements with Denise Duffy & Associates (DD&A), Inc to provide biological consulting services to develop an RMP and to assist the city in acquiring a city -wide incidental take permit to mitigate for future planned development; and,

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -26 approving change orders to each Agreement for additional biological services;

WHEREAS, to facilitate the completion of the Agreements, Denise Duffy & Associates (DD&A), Inc. has provided Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord HMP Compliance included in “EXHIBIT B”, and Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for City-Wide Section 2081 ITP included in “EXHIBIT C”; and,

WHEREAS, Change Order No. 2 to the Agreement for City -Wide Section 2081 ITP includes a not-to-exceed additional amount of $156,150.50 , bringing the total contact cost to $215,095 , which has been allocated from Fund 223.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 202 5- , approving change orders to amend the existing Agreements to extend the timeframe for both contracts and include additional services in the ITP contract , and to assist the city in acquiring a city -wide incidental take permit included in , and authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the city, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney. 6 Resolution No. 2025-
Page Two

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 20th day of May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

______________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

7 ·|}þ1
Imjin Pkwy
Inter-Garrison Rd
Reservation Rd
Blanco Rd
Abrams Dr
Cooper Rd
Del Monte Blvd
Beach Rd
California Ave
Carmel Ave
De Forest Rd
Monterey Gilia Occurrences - Airport, Cypress Knolls, and Del Monte Extension Development Scenario 1 in = 2,000 ft
2c
8/18/2022
¯
Path: D:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2021-03 City of Marina ITP\Map Products\Fig 2c - Monterey Gilia Airport DMB Development Scenario 8-18-22.mxd Scale
Date
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

Planning and Environmental Consulting
Figure
0 0.5 10.25 MileFormer Fort Ord Boundary
City of Marina Limits
Habitat Management Area (HMA)
Army Parcels
Monterey Gilia Occurrences in HMAs and
Potential Future Development Areas
2006-2021 DD&A Survey Results
!( Monterey Gilia Individuals
Monterey Gilia Populations
2017-2021 F. Watson Lab Survey Results
!( Monterey Gilia Individuals
50 ft Buffer of Monterey Gilia Occurrences
Potential Development Envelopes (346.5 ac)
Potential Future Development Areas
8th Street North Area
8th Street South Area
Airport Business Park Area
Future Cypress Knolls Development Area
Preston Park Area
Salinas/Reservation Road Area
Airport Master Plan Area
Landfill HMALandfill HMA
Salinas RiverSalinas River
HMAHMA
Marina AirportMarina Airport
HMAHMA
MarinaMarina
NorthwestNorthwest
Corner HMACorner HMA
162.8 ac
309 plants

11.2 ac
0 plants 9.1 ac
41 plants

9.4 ac
2 plants

11.6 ac
0 plants

99.3 ac
2824 plants

10.7 ac
51 plants

7.0 ac
21 plants

25.5 ac
1200 plants

EXHIBIT A
8 EXHIBIT B

Change Order No. 2
City of Marina
Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord HMP Compliance Amendment to Agreement

To: Layne Long, City Manager, City of Marina Date: May 15, 2025 From: Erin Harwayne, AICP, DD&A
Ref: Biological Consulting Services for Fort Ord HMP Compliance

Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. (DD&A) is contracted with the City of Marina (City) for the above-referenced project.

The development of th e Resource Management Plan has required more time than anticipated. The agreement expired on June 30, 2022. Therefore, this document requests an extension of the agreement until June 30, 2027.

If this amendment is accepted, DD&A will commence services once DD&A receives the signed authorization from the City. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain unchanged.

5/15/2025
Submitted by: ______________________________________________ DD&A Principal Date

Accepted by: ______________________________________________ City of Marina Date

9 EXHIBIT C
Change
Order No. 2
City of Marina
City-Wide Section 2081 ITP
Amendment to Agreement
To: Layne Long, City Manager, City of Marina Date: May 15, 2025 From: Erin Harwayne, AICP, DD&A
Ref: City-Wide Section 2081 ITP
INTRO

DUCTION
Denis
e Duffy & Associates, Inc. (DD&A) is contracted with the City of Marina (City) for the above-referenced project.

DD&A is requesting a second amendment to our agreement with the City to:
• extend the exp
iration of the contract,
• correct a clerical error related to the total budget stated in Change Order No. 1 issued April 9, 2021, and • increase the budget to include additional services.

The de
tails of the requested amendment are provided below. If this amendment is accepted, DD&A will commence services once DD&A receives the signed authorization from the City. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain unchanged.

AMEN

DMENT REQUEST
Exte
nd Contract
Through efforts in Task 1, it became evident that additional tasks were necessary to adequately complete the work efforts identified in the task, and as a result, Task 1 has taken more time than anticipated. The agreement expired on June 30, 2022. Therefore, this document requests an extension of the agreement until June 30, 2027.

Corr
ect Budget Total in Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 1 was issued on April 9, 2021, and authorized DD&A to complete additional surveys for Monterey gilia for a not-to-exceed cost of $10,000. However, the amount of the contracted budget was stated incorrectly in the staff report and the amendment. The approved budget for the contract is $48,944.50 (as approved by City Council on December 15, 2020, and agreement executed on December 18, 2020, per Resolution 2020-157). Change Order No. 1 incorrectly states the approved budget is $28,989 (which was the draft budget prior to Council requesting additional tasks at the December 15, 2020, meeting). Therefore, Change Order No. 1 should be corrected to state the accurate total budget of $58,944.50.
10 2

Additional Services

Completed Tasks December 2020 to May 2025
During Task 1 of our scope of work, additional out-of-scope tasks were identified to be necessary and completed utilizing the existing budget. The following is a summary of the approved and out-of-scope tasks:

• Scope: Identify potential future development areas that contain or may contain Monterey gilia, compile data, prepare draft mitigation strategy, three virtual meetings with City and working group o Additional Out-of-Scope Tasks:
 Additional coordination with working group regarding data collection  Additional surveys within Marina Northwest Corner, Cypress Knolls, Preston Park, and Marina Equestrian Center (in addition to the surveys authorized by Change Order No. 1)  Additional meetings (bi-monthly meetings with City for two years, monthly meetings with CDFW and USFWS)

• Scope: Revise draft mitigation strategy incorporating comments from City and working group and resubmit to team for comments (assumes one round of comments)
o Additional Out-of-Scope Tasks:
 Responded to multiple rounds of comments
 Additional meetings with City and working group to discuss revisions

• Scope: Incorporate comments on the revised draft mitigation strategy and prepare draft proposal to present to public at community workshop (virtual) to solicit input . The City and DD&A held a public information meeting soliciting input on the draft mitigation strategy at City Council meeting (December 7, 2021) o Additional Out-of-Scope Tasks:
 In response to Council request, prepared multiple options for the mitigation strategy and presented at community workshop on December 11, 2022, requiring multiple meetings and rounds of comments from City and working group and posterboards and other meeting materials to facilitate in-person meeting
 Held Study Session at a Special City Council meeting to discuss the options on December 13, 2022
 Facilitated a public field meeting in April 2023
 Presented update at City Council in December 2024
 Participated in General Plan 2045 Update meetings and coordinated with City and consultant team

• Scope: Incorporate public comments and submit to CDFW and present at virtual meeting, including two virtual meetings with team and two with CDFW
o Additional Out-of-Scope Tasks:
 Facilitated an in-person resource agency field meeting in December 2024  Facilitated and coordinated 2
nd Avenue/Del Monte Blvd Extension Alternative Alignment Study

11 3

Proposed Amended Scope of Work

Task 1. Mitigation Strategy Proposal

At the field meeting with the resource agencies in December 2024, the resource agencies strongly encouraged the inclusion of additional listed and candidate species due to their known and potential presence on City-owned lands within the former Fort Ord, including the identified Study Sites. In discussions with City staff, it was determined that it would be beneficial to include additional species in the ITP application to avoid having to undergo the ITP process again in the future. Therefore, this task is amended to include the following listed and candidate species in the ITP process, in addition to Monterey gilia (hereafter referred to as “Covered Species”):

• burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), candidate species for listing under CESA • Crotch bumble bee (Bombus crotchii, CBB), candidate species for listing under CESA • western bumble bee (Bombus occidentalis, WBB), candidate species for listing under CESA • seaside bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus rigidus ssp. littoralis), state endangered species

In addition, this task will include conducting a site assessment in accordance with the “Interim Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for Determining Presence or a Negative Finding of the California Tiger Salamander” issued by the USFWS and CDFW in October 2003. California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense, CTS) is a federal threatened species and state threatened species. If it is determined that CTS has the potential to occur on City-owned lands within the former Fort Ord, the City may be required to obtain a federal and state ITP for impacts to this species. If it is determined a federal and state ITP will be required by the resource agencies, an amendment to the Agreement will be requested for the additional work required to add this species to the state ITP as well as obtain a federal ITP.

DD&A will coordinate with the City to identify and define the proposed projects that may result in take of the Covered Species. Based on the data collected to date and description of the proposed projects, DD&A will calculate the anticipated impacts to the Covered Species that may result from project implementation. As part of the impact assessment, DD&A will coordinate with the City and engineers to reassess the potential impacts to Monterey gilia that may result from a realignment of Del Monte Boulevard/2 nd Avenue Extension. This scope of work assumes that
the alignment will be relocated to minimize impacts to Monterey gilia, as encouraged by the resource agencies.

DD&A will coordinate with the City to prepare a mitigation strategy proposal to present and discuss with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) in order to obtain an ITP in accordance with Section 2081 of the CESA. DD&A will coordinate with local experts in the development of the mitigation strategy. It is important to note that the mitigation strategy for each of the Covered Species may be different, may overlap with other Covered Species, and may involve different options.

First, DD&A will calculate the estimated acreage of impacts to the Covered Species that would be impacted by the proposed projects, identify an appropriate mitigation ratio and strategy, and describe the potential mitigation sites in a brief letter format. This will serve as an administrative draft mitigation strategy. DD&A will submit the administrative draft mitigation strategy to the City and local experts (hereafter “working group”) for review and comment. This scope of work assumes that the focused dev elopment areas previously identified during public outreach will continue to be the Airport Business Park Area, Future Cypress Knolls Development Area, and Del Monte Boulevard/2
nd Avenue Extension (realigned). This scope of work assumes two rounds of comments on the administrative draft mitigation strategy and two virtual meetings.

Second, DD&A will incorporate comments from the City and working group, and submit a draft mitigation strategy to the City and working group for review and comment. This scope of work assumes one round of comments on the draft mitigation strategy and one virtual meeting.
12 4

Third, DD&A will then incorporate final comments on the draft mitigation strategy, and prepare a public draft mitigation strategy to present to the public as part of a community workshop with the purpose of soliciting input on the public draft mitigation strategy. DD&A will facilitate the community workshop (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and working group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the workshop.

Lastly, DD&A will incorporate input from the public and prepare and submit the revised public draft mitigation strategy to the CDFW. The revised public draft mitigation strategy will be presented to CDFW at a virtual meeting for discussion and consideration. DD&A will work closely with the City, working group, and CDFW to respond to information requests and finalize the terms of the mitigation strategy. This task includes an estimated amount of project management time to coordinate with the City, working group, and CDFW.

This task will also include continued coordination related to the potential realignment of Del Monte Boulevard/2 nd
Avenue Extension, FORTAG, and General Plan 2045 Update. DD&A will coordinate with the City and engineers to prepare a draft and final memorandum describing the Del Monte Boulevard/2 nd Avenue Extension Alignment Alternative Analysis completed by Kimley-Horn and recommendations from City Council and public, which will be submitted to the CDFW and U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS). DD&A will participate in two virtual meetings with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) regarding potential mitigation opportunities related to the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway Project. This task also includes participation in the General Plan 2045 Update process as related to biological resources within the City, zoning and land use designations, and policy development, including four virtual meetings.

In addition to the meetings identified above, this task assumes bi-monthly meetings with the City and monthly meetings with CDFW (as well as the USFWS, as determined appropriate) for the duration of this task, which is assumed to be six months. DD&A will facilitate the meetings (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and wo rking group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the meetings.

This scope of work assumes that the data collected and available to date for all Covered Species will be sufficient to support the issuance of the ITP.

Deliverable(s): Administrative Draft, Draft, Public Draft, and Revised Public Draft Mitigation Strategy; Draft and Final Del Monte Boulevard/2
nd Avenue Extension Alignment Alternative Analysis Memorandum; Draft and Final Meeting Materials

Task 2. Prepare ITP Application

Based on the terms of the agreed-upon mitigation strategy, DD&A will work closely with the City, working group, and CDFW to prepare and submit a Section 2081 ITP application. The application will include all the required information, including, but not limited to, a description of the extent of take, proposed measures to minimize and fully mitigate the impacts of the proposed take, proposed plan to monitor compliance with the proposed measures, and a description of the funding sources and level of funding available to implement the proposed measures. The CDFW ITP application will require a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan.

DD&A will coordinate with the City and working group in the development of the application and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. This task assumes three meetings with the City and working group, and DD&A will facilitate the meetings (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, 13 5

meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and working group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the meetings.

DD&A will incorporate input from the City and working group and prepare and submit an administrative draft application and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to the City and working group for review and comment. This scope of work assumes two rounds of comments from the City and working group.

DD&A will incorporate comments and prepare a draft application and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to present to the public as part of a community workshop with the purpose of soliciting input on the documents. DD&A will facilitate the community workshop (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and working group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the workshop.

DD&A will incorporate input from the public and prepare and submit the final ITP application and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to the CDFW. The ITP application and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan will be presented to CDFW at a virtual meeting for discussio n. DD&A will work closely with the City, working group, and CDFW to respond to information requests and questions to facilitate permit issuance. This task includes an estimated amount of project management time to coordinate with the City, working group, and CDFW. This scope of work assumes that the application will be deemed incomplete twice and supplemental information will be required each time in order to be deemed complete.

In addition to the meetings identified above, this task assumes bi-monthly meetings with the City and monthly meetings with CDFW (as well as the USFWS, as determined appropriate) for the duration of this task, which is assumed to be six months. DD&A will facilitate the meetings (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and wo rking group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the meetings.

Deliverable: Administrative Draft, Draft, and Final CDFW ITP Application, Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and supporting information, as requested; Draft and Final Meeting Materials

Task 3. ITP Conditions

The ITP issued by CDFW will contain various conditions that will likely be required before the proposed take can occur. These requirements include, but are not limited to, acquisition of mitigation land, conservation of mitigation land in the form of deed restrict ions or conservation easement, creation of security and endowment funding, execution of any required agreements, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, preliminary title report(s), policy of title insurance, biological report, and final habitat management plan. The extent of these requirements will vary and depend on whether existing information is sufficient. DD&A will coordinate with the City, working group, and CDFW to identify, compile, and submit all requested documents in a timely manner.

This task assumes bi-monthly meetings with the City and bi-monthly meetings with CDFW (as well as the USFWS, as determined appropriate) for the duration of this task, which is assumed to be six months. DD&A will facilitate the meetings (assumed to be virtual) and provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting notes, PowerPoint presentations, etc. DD&A will submit drafts of all meeting materials to the City and working group, as determined necessary, for review and comment prior to the meetings.

Deliverables: Various/TBD; Draft and Final Meeting Materials

14 6

Task 4. City Council Meetings

In addition to the City Council meetings identified in Tasks 1-3, DD&A will participate in two additional City Council meetings (assumed to be virtual) to provide updates and input on the permit process. DD&A will coordinate with the City to provide all necessary meeting materials, including, but not limited to, staff reports and PowerPoint presentations. DD&A will submit drafts of all requested meeting materials to the City for review and comment prior to the meetings.

Deliverables: Draft and Final Meeting Materials

Budget

DD&A has exhausted the existing budget by completing the tasks identified above (please refer to Completed Tasks December 2020 to May 2025). As a result, DD&A is requesting additional budget to complete the ITP process and include the additional services described herein. DD&A will invoice on a time-and-material basis, with an initial not- to-exceed (NTE) amount of $ 156,150.50, as shown in the attached spreadsheet. The attached budget does not include the application fee. It is assumed the City will be required to pay the maximum total fee due to the cost of the projects and complexity of the ITP, which is $47,012.50.

Schedule

It is anticipated that the scope of work identified above will be completed by June 30, 2027.

5/15 /2025
Submitted by: ______________________________________________ DD&A Principal Date

Accepted by: ______________________________________________ City of Marina Date

15 Task
Principal
Senior Project
Manager
Senior
Planner/Scientist
Assoc
Planner/Scientist
Asst
Planner/Scientist
GIS/Computer
Specialist
Admin/Editing
Hours
Per Task Expenses Admin
Fee
Cost Per
Task
1 Mitigation Strategy Proposal 8 60 80 100 140 60 18 466 10 2$ 71,211.50 2 Prepare ITP Application 4 40 80 60 48 32 10 274 10 2$ 44,019.50 3 ITP Conditions 8 20 40 60 24 12 8 172 10 2$ 27,579.50 4 City Council Meetings 8 20 10 10 8 8 20 84 -$ 13,340.00 Total Hours 28 140 210 230 220 112 56 996 Hourly Rate $278.00 $202.00 $185.00 $141.00 $127.00 $145.00 $82.00 Total Labor 7,784$ 28,280$ 38,850$ 32,430$ 27,940$ 16,240$ 4,592$ 156,150.50 Total Budget 156,150.50
DD&A Cost Estimate - City-Wide Section 2081 ITP Change Order No. 2 16 State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, California 93710
(559) 243-4005
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
May 13, 2025
Mayor Bruce Delgado
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
[email protected]
Subject: Del Monte Blvd/Second Street Extension; Impacts on Monterey Gilia; City of Marina City-Wide Incidental Take Permit
Dear Mayor Bruce Delgado and City Council Representatives:

Since November 2024, the City of Marina (City) has met regularly with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to consult on a “city-wide” California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for take of Monterey gilia (Gilia tenuiflora ssp. arenaria) incidental to the Del Monte Extension, Cypress Knolls, and Airport Business Park projects (collectively, “Project”). There are approximately 16,127 Monterey gilia plants and 55.1 acres of Monterey gilia habitat within the entire City. Of that, the Project would impact approximately 4,333 Monterey gilia plants (26 percent) and 23.8 acres of Monterey gilia habitat (43 percent). Monterey gilia is a plant species listed as threatened under the CESA1. This letter is in regard to the proposed Del Monte Extension. CDFW supports an alignment of the proposed roadway that would substantially reduce impacts to Monterey gilia and habitat in the Marina Northwest Corner Habitat Management Area (HMA) as discussed further herein.

The City proposes to construct the Del Monte Extension, a roadway that would connect the north and south regions of the City but would divide the 25.4-acre Marina Northwest Corner HMA which is a primary habitat area for sensitive species and plant communities (see Attachment 1). There are approximately 3,853 Monterey gilia plants and 13.2 acres of Monterey gilia habitat within the Marina Northwest Corner HMA. The Del Monte Extension would impact approximately 1,200 Monterey gilia plants and 5.7 acres of Monterey gilia habitat, approximately 27 percent and 23 percent of the Project’s total impacts on Monterey gilia plants and habitat, respectively. In addition to impacts to Monterey gilia, the proposed Del Monte Extension would impact dune shrub, maritime chaparral, Smith’s blue butterfly habitat (Euphilotes enoptes smithi), Coast wallflower (Erysimum ammophilum), Yadon’s piperia (Piperia yadonii), and Monterey spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens) (see Attachment 2). Monterey gilia is a California endemic

1 The definition of an endangered, threatened, and candidate species for the purposes of CESA are found in Fish and Game Codes sections 2062, 2067, and 2068, respectively. Take of Monterey gilia, or any part or product thereof including seeds is prohibited without prior authorization by CDFW through the issuance of an ITP or other form of authorization (Fish & G. Code, §2081 subd. (b) and (c)).

Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 17 City of Marina
Mayor Bruce Delgado and City Council
May 13, 2025

species with a range restricted to the Monterey Peninsula. The Monterey gilia population and Monterey gilia habitat in the Marina Northwest Corner HMA are important for maintaining the species within the City and are key components for conserving the species generally. The Del Monte Extension would cause significant impacts to Monterey gilia and Monterey gilia habitat. These impacts would include take of Monterey gilia plants and seeds, permanent removal of Monterey gilia habitat, degradation of adjacent habitat quality (e.g., spread of non-native and invasive plants, erosion, soil loss, pollution, and changes in disturbance patterns), disruption of processes that are critical for Monterey gilia survival and reproduction (e.g., seed germination, growth, reproduction, and seed dispersal), and reduced connectivity between different Monterey gilia populations and areas of both occupied and potentially occupied habitat.

Impacts to Monterey gilia to be authorized by CDFW must be fully mitigated through permanent protection and perpetual management of compensatory habitat (Cal Code Regs., § 783.4; Fish & G. Code, § 2081(b)(1)). CDFW advised the City that it may be difficult to identify sufficient compensatory habitat within the City to fully mitigate the Project’s impacts unless the City evaluates whether there are feasible Project alternatives that would substantially reduce impacts to Monterey gilia. Moreover, the Project would have a cumulative impact to Monterey gilia as a whole when considered along with foreseeable impacts from other projects within the City such as the California Avenue Segment of the Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway (FORTAG) project (Cal.

Code Regs., § 783.2), which also seeks to impact and mitigate for impacts to Monterey gilia within the City. Pursuant to California Code of Regulations section 783.4, CDFW must find that impacts of the take to be authorized in an ITP are minimized and fully mitigated for CDFW to issue an ITP for the Project. For those reasons, CDFW recommended the City consider alternative alignments for the Del Monte Extension that would substantially reduce significant adverse impacts to Monterey gilia. In addition, an alternative alignment may provide habitat creation and/or restoration opportunities in the Marina Northwest Corner HMA as a measure to mitigate Project impacts occurring elsewhere (e.g., Airport Business Park).

On May 5, 2025, CDFW met with Layne Long and Guido Persicone representing the City and was informed that a potential conceptual alternative alignment has been identified for the Del Monte Extension and that the City will consider the alternative in an upcoming City Council meeting on May 20, 2025. CDFW supports an alternative alignment that would substantially avoid and/or minimize impacts to Monterey gilia and habitat in the Marina Northwest Corner HMA. CDFW appreciates the City’s efforts to consider alternative alignments and would like to acknowledge Layne Long and Guido Persicone for their coordination with CDFW.

CDFW appreciates the City’s efforts to comply with CESA, preserve Monterey gilia, and incorporate conservation efforts into the City’s development plans. If you have any Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 18 City of Marina
Mayor Bruce Delgado and City Council
May 13, 2025

questions relating to this letter, please contact Ruby Kwan-Davis, Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist), at (805) 748-3624 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Julie A. Vance
Regional Manager
Attachments: Attachment 1: Marina Northwest Corner HMA Preserve and Roads Attachment 2: Marina Northwest Corner HMA Rare Plants (Overview) ec: California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Krista Tomlinson, Environmental Program Manager I
Craig Bailey, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisory) Jeremy Pohlman, Senior Environmental (Supervisory)
Jeb Bjerke, Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist) Ruby Kwan-Davis, Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist) Evelyn Barajas-Perez, Environmental Scientist
Stephanie Manzo, Environmental Scientist
City of Marina
Liesbeth Visscher, District 4, Mayor Pro Tem -
[email protected]
Brian McCarthy, District 1 Council Member - [email protected] Kathy Y. Biala, District 2 Council Member - [email protected] Jenny McAdams, District 3 Council Member - [email protected] Layne Long, City Manager - [email protected]
Guido Persicone, Community Development Director -
[email protected]
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

Erin Harwayne, Senior Planner/Project Manager - [email protected] Liz Camilo, Associate Scientist - [email protected] United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, North Coast Division
Cat Darst, Field Supervisor – [email protected]
Mark Ogonowski, Senior Fish and Wildlife Biologist – [email protected] Karen Sinclair, Biologist – [email protected]
Todd Lemein, Botanist – [email protected]
Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 19 Attachment 1
Marina Northwest Corner HM Preserve and Roads

Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 20 }1
MARINA

NORTHWEST

CORNER HMA

FORT ORD

DUNES STATE

PARK HMA
13THST

HAYES CIRCLE

BOOKER STREET
3RD AVENUE

RENDOV A ROAD

CARSWELL STREET

REINDOLLAR AVENUE
GRAN

T STREET

OWEN A VENUE
Proposed 2nd Avenue Extension
Plan Area
Habitat Mangement Area
Proposed 5-Acre Preserve
Ü
0 500 1,000250
Feet
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Monterey | Truckee | San Jose
Environmental Consultants and Resource Planning
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341

Proposed 2nd Avenue Extension
within Marina Northwest Corner HMA
Figure
X
Sand City
Seaside
Del Rey Oaks
Salinas
GeneralJim
M
ooreBoulevard
Inter-Garrison Road
DavisRoad
Blanco Road
Reservation Road
BarloyCanyonRoad
SouthBoundaryRoad
}1
}68
Map Detail
Ü
0120.5
Miles
Document Path: C:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2444 FORAHCP\Final Products\Final Maps\NW Corner Preserve and Roads.mxd Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe,
GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
Aerogrid, IGN, IGP , swisstopo, and the GIS User
Figure 3-22
NW Corner Preserve and Roads
Source: Denise Duffy and Associates
Graphics … 00533.07 HCP (4/18/2017) TG
Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 21 Attachment 2
Marina Northwest Corner HMA Rare Plants (Overview)
Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 22 Marina Northwest Corner Habitat Management Area
Rare Plants (Overview) 1 in = 200 ft
2c-1
8/31/2023
¯
Path: D:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2021-04 City of Marina HMP\Final Products\HMP Maps\Fig 2c-1 - NW CORNER Rare Plants (Overview) v2.mxd Scale
Date
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

Planning and Environmental Consulting
Figure
0 250 500125 Feet
Marina Northwest Corner
Habitat Management Area
City of Marina Limits
Former Fort Ord Boundary
Rare Plant Individuals
!( Coast Wallflower
!( Monterey Gilia
!( Kellogg's Horkelia
!( Michael's Piperia
!( Yadon's Piperia
Rare Plant Populations
Sandmat Manzanita
Monterey Ceanothus
Monterey Spineflower
Eastwood's Goldenbush
Coast Wallflower
Monterey Gilia
Kellogg's Horkelia
MARINA
Salinas River
|ÿ1
STATE
ROUTE
1 Booker St
HayesCir
Seeno Cir
13th St
Docusign Envelope ID: D255D46B-234C-4BA4-B6C5-BE4E058E4CD0 23 May 14, 2025 Item No. 13c
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 20, 2025
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,
APPROVING THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WITH PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS, AND; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET APPROPRIATION OF $10,000 OF GAS TAX/STREET FUND FOR SIGNS AND SUPPLIES, AND; AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO
MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND;
CONSIDER INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO. 20 25- FOR FIRST

READING BY TITLE ONLY, AND WAIVING FURTHER READING,
AMENDING SECTION 10.60.010 “SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED” OF CHAPTER 10.60 “SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 10 “VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC” OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT PRIMA FACIE

SPEED LIMITS PURSUANT TO ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

AND THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE (CVC)
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-, approving the 20 25 Engineering and Traffic Survey with recommended speed limits, and;

2. Authorize a budget appropriation of $10,000 of Gas Tax/Street Fund for signs and supplies, and;

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and;

4. Consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, for first reading by title only and waive further reading, amending Section 10.60.010 “Speed Limits Established” of Chapter 10.60 “Speed Limits” of Title 10 “Vehicles and Traffic” to adopt prima facie speed limits1 pursuant to an engineering and traffic survey and the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

BACKGROUND:

California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 40802b requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits must be conducted once every five years by governing municipalities.

In order for the speed limit on a collector or arterial street to be enforceable by the Police Department through the use of radar or other electronic device to measure speed, the speed limit must be set in accordance with a n Engineering and Traffic Survey. The California Vehicle Code states that if a posted speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey, the City may not prove a violation of the posted limit by the use of radar or any other electronic device (CVC 40802).
1 Prima facie speed limits, as used in California and some other states, are not absolute limits. A motorist may have a valid defense to exceeding the prima facie speed limit if he or she can prove in a court that his or her speed was reasonable and prudent.
1 1
On November 20, 2024 , t he City entered into a Service Agreement with the on -call traffic engineering firm Kimley Horn to conduct and draft an Engineering and Traffic Survey. This Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Marina.

At the regular meeting of May 1, 2025 the Public Works Commission received an information update on the 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey . The Commission passed a 3 to 1 motion to recommend a further reduction of 5 mph for Street #4 (Del Monte – from Reservation to Beach) and to re-evaluate Streets #9 and 10 (Reservation – from Crescent to Salinas) for possibly a third segment between them.

At the regular meeting of May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025 -38, 2025- 38, a pproving the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey with recommended speed limits; and authorize staff to review comments from the City Council and return the Survey recommendations for final acceptance on May 20, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria are met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic condition s have occurred as specified in Sec tion 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

In addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions have significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill (AB)-43-Traffic Safety would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.

The California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety.

Previous E&TS study was conducted in the Year 2020 and included 43 roadway segments. This current E&TS study includes a total of 45 roadway segments. The final draft speed limit recommendations for the 45 roadway segments are summarized in “EXHIBIT A ”. The entire report has been attached as “EXHIBIT B”. To enforce the recommendations in Exhibit A, the City must adopted the revisions to the speed limits into Municipal Code section 10.60.010 “ SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED”.

The comments collected from the Public Works Commission meeting of May 1 st and the City Council meeting of May 6th have been compiled and summarized in “EXHIBIT C”. It is important to note that the E&TS does not have supporting evidence to lower the recommended speed limits for Segment 44 (Abrams Drive – Imjin Parkway[West] to Preston Drive]) and Segment 45 (Marina Heights Drive – California to Imjin Parkway) from the initial recommended 30 MPH to the requested 25 MPH. Although the City could adopt the lower speed limit into its Municipal Code, the City may have difficulty defending the lower speed limit if it were to be challenged in Court.

2 2
FISCAL IMPACT:

The CVC provides that the new speed limit is enforceable when signs are erected giving notice of the new limits. The cost to purchase and install a new speed limit sign is approximately $300 per location and approximately $ 800 per road marking location . The estimated cost for new speed limit signs and road markings is $ 10,000.00. Should the City Council approve this request, the City Finance Director will make all necessary accounting and budgetary entries to appropriate funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25, Gas Tax/Street Funds for signs & supplies.

CONCLUSION:

The adoption of the ordinance shall come back to the City Council at the next schedule meeting.

Adoption of the Resolution and ordinance will allow for effective speed enforcement. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
APPROVING THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WITH
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS, AND; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET APPROPRIATION OF $10,000 OF GAS TAX/STREET FUND FOR SIGNS AND SUPPLIES, AND; AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND;
INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO. 2025- FOR FIRST READING BY TITLE

ONLY, AND WAIVING FURTHER READING, AMENDING SECTION

10.60.010 “SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED” OF CHAPTER 10.60 “SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 10 “VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC” OF THE MUNICIPAL

CODE TO ADOPT PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS PURSUANT TO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY AND THE CALIFORNIA

VEHICLE CODE (CVC)

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 40802b requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits must be conducted once every five years by governing municipalities , and;

WHEREAS, in order for the speed limit on a collector or arterial street to be enforceable by the Police Department through the use of radar or other electronic device to measure speed, the speed limit must be set in accordance with a n Engineering and Traffic Survey. The California Vehicle Code states that if a posted speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey, the City may not prove a violation of the posted limit by the use of radar or any other electronic device (CVC 40802), and;

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2024, the City entered into a Service Agreement with the on -call traffic engineering firm Kimley Horn to conduct and draft an Engineering and Traffic Survey. This Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Marina, and;

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of May 1, 2025 the Public Works Commission received an information update on the 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey . The Commission passed a 3 to 1 motion to recommend a further reduction of 5 mph for Street #4 (Del Monte – from Reservation to Beach) and to re-evaluate Streets #9 and 10 (Reservation – from Crescent to Salinas) for possibly a third segment between them, and;

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-38, 2025-38, approving the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey with recommended speed limits; and authorize staff to review comments from the City Council and return the Survey recommendations for final acceptance on May 20, 2025, and;

WHEREAS, Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code .

Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria are met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traff ic conditions have occurred as specified in Section 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), and;

4 4
Resolution 2025-
Page Two

WHEREAS, in addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions have significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill (AB)-43-Traffic Safety would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years, and;

WHEREAS, the California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety, and;

WHEREAS, previous E&TS study was conducted in the Year 2020 and included 43 roadway segments.

This current E&TS study includes a total of 45 roadway segments. The draft speed limit recommendations for the 45 roadway segments are summarized in “ Exhibit A ”. The entire report has been attached as “Exhibit B”. To enforce the recommendations in Exhibit A, the City must adopted the revisions to the speed limits into Municipal Code section 10.60.010 “SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED”, and;

WHEREAS, the comments collected from the Public Works Commission meeting of May 1st and the City Council meeting of May 6 th have been compiled and summarized in “Exhibit C”. It is important to note that the E&TS does not have supporting evidence to lower the recommended speed limits for Segment 44 (Abrams Drive – Imjin Parkway[West] to Preston Drive]) and Segment 45 (Marina Heights Drive – California to Imjin Parkway) from the initial recommended 30 MPH to the requested 25 MPH. Although the City could adopt the lower speed limit into its Municipal Code, the City may have difficulty defending the lower speed limit if it were to be challenged in Court, and;

WHEREAS, the CVC provides that the new speed limit is enforceable when signs are erected giving notice of the new limits. The cost to purchase and install a new speed limit sign is approximately $300 per location and approximately $800 per road marking location. The estimated cost for new speed limit signs and road markings is $ 10,000.00. Should the City Council approve this request, the City Finance Director will make all necessary accounting and budgetary entries to appropriate funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25, Gas Tax/Street Funds for signs & supplies, and;

WHEREAS, the adoption of the ordinance shall come back to the City Council at the next schedule meeting. Adoption of the Resolution and ordinance will allow for effective speed enforcement. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey with proposed speed limit revisions, and;

2. Authorize a budget appropriation of $10,000 of Gas Tax/Street Fund for signs and supplies, and;

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and;

4. Introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, for first reading by title only and waive further reading, amending Section 10.60.010 “Speed Limits Established” of Chapter

10.60 “Speed Limits” of Title 10 “Vehicles and Traffic” to adopt prima facie speed limits pursuant to an engineering and traffic survey and the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

5 5
Resolution No. 2025-
Page Three

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on May 20, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
ATTEST: Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

_______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

6 6
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
AMENDING SECTION 10.60.010 “SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED” OF CHAPTER 10.60 “SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 10 “VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC,”

OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS

PURSUANT TO AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY AND THE

CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits of more than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and

WHEREAS, THE California Vehicles Code Section 627 defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:

1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident records;
3) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and

WHEREAS, the City of Marina has completed an engineering and traffic survey pursuant to California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City of Marina is authorized to use radar enforcement of speed limits on local streets pursuant to the prima facie speed limits specified in the California Vehicle Code and on other streets if the speed limits established by the City are consistent with the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted according to the standards set forth in the California Vehicle Code.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Marina finds and declares that an Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code.

SECTION 3 Based on the findings and recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Survey, all Subsections of Section 10.60.010 entitled “Speed Limits Established” of Title 10, Chapter 10.60 , of the Marina Municipal Code are amended, repealing in their entirety and replacing Subsections A through G and adding Subsections H through Y; to read in their entirety as follows:

“A. Reservation Road, as follows:

1. Thirty-five miles per hour from Dunes Drive to Beach Road;

2. Thirty miles per hour from Beach Road to Del Monte Blvd;

3. Thirty-five miles per hour from Del Monte Blvd to Crescent Ave;

4. Forty miles per hour from Crescent Ave to Salinas Ave;

5. Fifty miles per hour from Salinas Avenue to Imjin Parkway;

6. Fifty-five miles per hour from Imjin Parkway to Blanco Road.

7 7
Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Three

B. Del Monte Boulevard, as follows:

1. Thirty-Five miles per hour from six hundred feet south of Reindollar Avenue to Reservation Road;

2. Thirty miles per hour from Reservation Road to Beach Road;

3. Forty miles per hour from Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive.

C. Cardoza Avenue, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Reservation Road to the end thereof, which is approximately six hundred feet north of Lakewood Drive.

D. Carmel Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Del Monte Boulevard to approximately 300 feet west of Everett Drive;

2. The prima facie speed limit on Carmel Avenue from approximately 300 feet west of Everett Drive to Bostick Avenue shall be fifteen miles per hour when children are present;

3. Twenty-five miles per hour from Bostick Avenue to Salinas Avenue.

E. California Avenue, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue;

2. Twenty-five miles per hour from Carmel Avenue to Reindollar Avenue;

3. Forty miles per hour from Reindollar Avenue to Imjin Parkway;

4. Thirty miles per hour from Imjin Parkway to 8th Street.

F. Crescent Avenue, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road;

2. Twenty-five miles per hour from Reservation Road to the end thereof, which is approximately two hundred fifty feet north of Quebrada Del Mar.

G. Beach Road, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Reservation Road to Del Monte Boulevard;

2. Twenty-five miles per hour from Del Monte Boulevard to De Forest Road;

3. The prima facie speed limit from Begonia Circle to Villa Circle shall be fifteen miles per hour when children are present.

H. 2nd Avenue, as follows:

1. Forty miles per hour from Divarty Street to 8th Street;

2. Thirty-five miles per hour from 8th Street to Imjin Parkway.

I. 3rd Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from 8th Street to Imjin Parkway.

J. 8th Street, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from 2nd Avenue to 3rd Avenue;

2. Thirty-five miles per hour from 5th Avenue/California Avenue to Inter- Garrison Road.

8 8

Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Four

K. 9th Street, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from 1st Avenue to 2nd Avenue.

L. De Forest Road, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Beach Road to Reservation Road.

M. Reindollar Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue;

2. Twenty-five miles per hour from California Avenue to Carmel Avenue.

N. Lake Drive, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Palm Avenue to Reservation Road.

O. Palm Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Lake Drive to Del Monte Boulevard.

P. Salinas Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road.

Q. Paul Davis Drive, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Healy Avenue to Marina Greens Drive.

R. Seacrest Avenue, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road.

S. Sunset Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue.

T. Vaughan Avenue, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue.

U. Crescent Street, as follows:

1. The prima facie speed limit from Patton Parkway to Reindollar Avenue shall be twenty-five miles per hour when children are present.

V. Patton Parkway, as follows:

1. The prima facie speed limit from End (Marina High School) to Crescent Street shall be twenty-five miles per hour when children are present;

2. Thirty-five miles per hour from Crescent Street to California Avenue.

W. Preston Drive, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Abrams Drive to Imjin Parkway.

X. Abrams Drive, as follows:

1. Thirty miles per hour from Preston Drive to Imjin Parkway (East).

2. Twenty-five miles per hour from Preston Drive to Imjin Parkway (West).

9 9
Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Five

Y. Imjin Parkway, as follows:

1. Forty-five miles per hour from State Route 1 to California Avenue;

2. Fifty miles per hour from California Avenue to Reservation Road.

Z. Marina Heights Drive, as follows:

1. Twenty-five miles per hour from California Avenue to Imjin Parkway.”

SECTION 4. The prima facie speed limit for each portion of Reservation Road, Del Monte Boulevard, Cardoza Avenue, Carmel Avenue, California Avenue, Crescent Avenue, Beach Road, 2nd Avenue, 3rd Avenue, 8th Street, 9 th Street, De Forest Road, Reindollar Avenue, Lake Drive, Palm Avenue, Salinas Avenue, Paul Davis Drive, Seacrest Avenue, Sunset Avenue, Vaughan Avenue, Crescent Street, Patton Parkway, Preston Drive, Abrams Drive, Imjin Parkway , and Marina Heights Drive set forth in Section 3 hereof, shall be a s set forth therein when signs are erected giving notice thereof.

SECTION 5 . Any provision of the Marina Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 6 . The City Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph, and section by section, and does hereby declare that the provisions of this ordinance are severable and, if for any reason any sentence, p aragraph or section of this ordinance shall be held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this ordinance.

SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage.

SECTION 8. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on May 20, 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on June 3, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
10 10
Marina Speed Study - Final Speed Limit Recommendations
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 0.83 0.99 No 50 50 50 Yes 45 -5 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 0.44 1.07 No 25 39.15 N/A (See Note 1) No N/A (See Note 1) 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservation Road 0.41 0.99 No 40 45.10 40 Yes 35 -5 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0.00 0.99 No 40 42 35 Yes 30 -10 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0.00 1.07 No 40 45.15 40 No 40 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0.00 1.07 No 35 34 35 No 35 7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 0.46 1.07 No 30 33.15 30 No 30 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Avenue 0.69 0.99 No 35 39 35 No 35 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0.21 0.99 No 40 43 40 No 40 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0.00 0.99 No 45 51 45 No 40 -5 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 0.50 1.33 No 55 57 55 No 50 -5 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0.39 0.99 No 55 60.15 55 No 55 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 32.60 25 No 25 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0.00 1.07 No 40 41 35 No 35 -5 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 30 31 25 No 25 -5 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 0.20 1.07 No 45 46 40 No 40 -5 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0.27 1.07 No 35 36 35 No 35 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 2.03 1.07 Yes 35 35 30 No 30 -5 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 2.09 1.07 Yes 30 36 30 No 30 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Road 0.00 1.07 No 25 32 25 No 25 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Aveneue 0.86 1.07 No 30 36 30 No 30 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0.00 1.07 No 30 35 30 No 30 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0.00 1.07 No 30 28 25 No 25 -5 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Aveneue 0.52 1.07 No 30 37 30 No 30 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 32 30 No 25 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkway 0.30 1.07 No 40 45 40 No 40 # Street Name
Segment
Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Initial Recommended
Speed Limit (MPH)Limit 1 Limit 2
85th
Percentile
Speed (MPH)
Segment Collision
Rate (CR)
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration of
Bicyclists or
Pedestrians
Draft
Recommended
Speed Limit (MPH)
Change
Speed Limit
(MPH)
1 5/14/2025

EXHIBIT A TO STAFF REPORT
11 Marina Speed Study - Final Speed Limit Recommendations 5/14/2025 # Street Name
Segment
Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Initial Recommended
Speed Limit (MPH)Limit 1 Limit 2
85th
Percentile
Speed (MPH)
Segment Collision
Rate (CR)
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration of
Bicyclists or
Pedestrians
Draft
Recommended
Speed Limit (MPH)
Change
Speed Limit
(MPH)
27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0.00 1.07 No 30 28 30 No 30 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 34 25 No 25 29 Reindollar Avenue/Bostick Avenue California Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0.00 1.07 No 30 33 25 No 25 -5 30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0.70 1.07 No 25 31 25 No 25 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 29 25 No 25 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0.00 1.07 No 25 24 25 No 25 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 0.00 1.07 No 30 25 25 No 25 -5 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Avenue 2.30 1.07 Yes 40 41 35 No 35 -5 35 Crescent Avenue Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 30 25 No 25 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0.00 1.07 No 25 29 25 No 25 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 1.53 1.07 Yes 30 31.15 30 No 30 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0.00 1.07 No 25 31 25 No 25 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 1.50 1.07 Yes 25 36 25 No 25 40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 0.00 1.07 No 25 28 25 No 25 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 1.93 1.07 Yes 30 34 30 No 30 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0.00 1.07 No 30 29.15 30 No 30 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0.00 1.07 No 25 27 25 No 25 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 0.00 1.07 No 25 35.15 30 No 25 45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0.00 1.07 No 25 34 30 No 25

1. Roadway segment was under construction at the time of speed data collection. Therefore, no recommendations are made for this segment Notes
2 Street
12 ENGINEERING AND

TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR Speed Limits
Prepared for:

EXHIBIT B
13 City of Marina i May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... i

1.0 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 1

1.1 Regulations and Guidelines ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 1

1.2 Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and Traffic Study ................................ .......... 7

2.0 Speed Survey Evaluation................................ ................................ ............................ 8

2.1 Field Review ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 11

2.2 Statistical Analysis Factors ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 11

2.3 2014 California MUTCD and CVC Guidance ................................ ................................ ................... 13

2.4 Data Collection................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 14

2.5 Collision History ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 14

3.0 Results And Recommendations ................................ ................................ .............. 20

List of Figures

Figure 1: City of Marina Existing Posted Speed Limits ................................ ......................... 10 Figure 2: City of Marina Recommended Speed Limits ................................ ........................ 38

List of Tables

Table 1: Survey Locations and Limits Evaluated ................................ ................................ ....8 Table 2: 2022 California State Highways Collision Rates ................................ ..................... 14 Table 3: Collision History Summary at Study Segments (2020-2022) ................................ 16 Table 4: Collision Rate Summary at Study Segments ................................ .......................... 18 Table 5: Speed Survey Recommendations ................................ ................................ ............ 21

EXHIBIT B
14 City of Marina 1 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Marina. This survey was authorized by the C ity and independently conducted by the private consulting firm Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (Kimley-Horn).

Engineering and traffic surveys for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code .

Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria is met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred as specified in Section 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC ). In addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions have significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill ( AB)-43-Traffic Safety would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.

The California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety.

1.1 Regulations and Guidelines
Division 11, Chapter 7, of the 2023 California Vehicle Code defines the California Speed Laws. Section 22352 of the CVC indicates that prima facie speed limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:

(a)Fifteen miles per hour:

(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any

EXHIBIT B
15 City of Marina 2 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
railway grade crossing where a human flag person is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.

(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.

(3) On any alley.

(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:

(1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.

(2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.

For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

(3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those

EXHIBIT B
16 City of Marina 3 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Division 1 of the CVC defines a business district and residence district in Section 235 and 515, respectively.

A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.”1

A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.”2

Section 22357(a) permits the establishment of speed limits greater than 25 mph upon street other than state highway, based on the following text:

“(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate

1 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 1, Section 235, 2023. 2 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 1, Section 515, 2023.

EXHIBIT B
17 City of Marina 4 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 -mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.”3

Therefore, the CVC allows local authorities to increase or decrease the prima facie limits by ordinance or resolution to appropriate limits as determined by an engineering and traffic survey. Posted speed limits not defined in the CVC or established by ordinance are not valid. The CVC requires that speed surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other electronic devices at locations where speed limits are to be enforced with the use of radar. The current survey must be completed within five years as specified in Section 40802(a); seven years as specified in Section 40802(c), or fourteen years as specified in Section 40802(c), of the date of the preceding survey. A survey allowed to expire passed the valid duration of the previous survey would constitute a speed trap as defined in Sections 40802(a) and 40802(b) of the CVC (with added amendments as per AB-43):

“(a) A “speed trap is either of the following:

(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone , senior zone, business activity district , or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by

3 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 11. Chapter 7, Section 22357(a), 2023.

EXHIBIT B
18 City of Marina 5 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.”

(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.

(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision(b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.

“(c) (2) A “speed trap is either of the following:

(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

B) (i)A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not

EXHIBIT B
19 City of Marina 6 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

(I)Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years.(II)If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.

(ii)This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.”4

CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12af Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.

Standard:
12ag Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ah If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit not below the immediately prior speed limit.

Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

Excerpts from the CVC are attached in the Appendix A.

4 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 17. Chapter 3, Section 40802, 2023.

EXHIBIT B
20 City of Marina 7 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

1.2 Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and
Traffic Study
Speed zones are primarily established to protect the public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. Speed limits are generally established at or near the 85 th percentile speed, which is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of traffic is moving. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive on the roadways as to what speed is reasonable and safe and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey, as defined in Section 627 of the CVC, must consider the prevailing speeds, collision records, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and roadway traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Speed zones are also established to advise motorists of road conditions or hazards, which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which is considered in combination with the statisti cal data and collision history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. The specific procedures used in the performance of an Engineering and Traffic Study are outlined in the 2014 California MUTCD. The statistical factors used to analyze the collected speed survey data and additional factors as noted in the 2014 California MUTCD to consider are defined in the following section.

EXHIBIT B
21 City of Marina 8 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

2.0 SPEED SURVEY EVALUATION
Forty-five (45) locations were evaluated by Kimley -Horn and included in this report.

These roadway sections and limits of the sections are listed in Table 1 . Also, Error! Reference source not found. shows the location of survey locations with their existing posted speed limits.

Table 1: Survey Locations and Limits Evaluated
S. No. Street Limit 1 Limit 2 Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 50 50
2** Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 25 39.15 3 Del Monte
Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar
Avenue
Reservation Road 40 45.10
4 Del Monte
Boulevard
Reservation Road Beach Road 40 42
5 Del Monte
Boulevard
Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 40 45.15
6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 35 34
7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 30 33.15 8 Reservation Road Del Monte
Boulevard
Crescent Avenue 35 39
9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 45 43 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenue 45 51 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 55 57
12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 55 60.15
13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 25 32.60
14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 40 41
15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 30 31
16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 45 46
17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 35 36
18* Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 35 35 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 30 36
20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Road 25 32 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 30 36 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 30 35 23 Beach Road Del Monte
Boulevard
De Forest Road 30 28
24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 30 37 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 25 32 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkway 40 45 27* California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 30 28
28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard
California Avenue 25 34

EXHIBIT B
22 City of Marina 9 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
S. No. Street Limit 1 Limit 2 Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
85th Percentile
Speed (mph)
29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostick
Avenue
California Avenue Carmel Avenue 30 33
30* Carmel Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard
California Avenue 25 31
31* Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 25 29 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 25 24
33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 30 25 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Avenue 40 41 35 Crescent Street Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 25 30 36* Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 29 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 30 31.15 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 31
39* Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 25 36
40* Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 25 28
41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 30 34
42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 30 29.15
43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 25 27
44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 25 35.15 45 Marina Heights
Drive
California Avenue Imjin Parkway 25 34
Notes:
*- No posted speed limit sign exists in the field. Existing posted speed limit is per City Resolution No. 2020-54 **- Posted speed limit is 25 MPH due to on-going construction

EXHIBIT B
23 City of Marina 10 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Figure 1: City of Marina Existing Posted Speed Limits

EXHIBIT B
24 City of Marina 11 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

2.1 Field Review
Speed data was collected using manual radar surveys performed by a sub-consultant to Kimley-Horn, IDAX Data Solutions (IDAX) . Each of the radar speed checks were made from an inconspicuously parked, unmarked vehicl e or by a technician standing on the side of the road . An effort was made to ensure that the presence of the vehicle or technician in no way affected the speed of the traffic being surveyed. Field information from these speed surveys and other roadway characteristics were recorded on field data forms and later coded into engineering software for analysis purposes. Chapter 2B of the 2014 California MUTCD indicates that it is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 vehicles for a speed zone survey for an arterial street. This may result in excessive survey periods for low volume roadways, but a survey should not contain less than 50 vehicles. In addition, average daily traffic volumes (ADT) and roadway widths were collected at all the locations.

Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below. The results of the field review for related roadway and traffic variables are summarized in the Engineering and Traffic Survey forms included in the Appendix C.

1. Segment length, width and alignment;

2. Level of pedestrian, bicycle, and truck activity

3. Traffic flow characteristics;

4. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors;

5. Frequency of intersections, driveways, on-street parking, bike lanes;

6. Locations of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;

7. Pavement condition;

8. Obstructions to driver/pedestrian visibility;

9. Land use and proximity of schools, parks/recreation areas and senior centers;

10. Uniformity with existing speed zones in adjacent jurisdictions; and,

11. Any other unusual conditions or hazards not readily apparent to the driver.

In addition to speed data collected by IDAX, field visit has been done by Kimley -Horn engineers at all forty -five locations to familiarize with the exiting conditions and better judgment for speed recommendations.

2.2 Statistical Analysis Factors
Significant factors used to analyze the collected survey data are summarized below:

EXHIBIT B
25 City of Marina 12 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

1. 85th Percentile Speed . The Critical Speed, or the 85 th percentile speed , is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This factor is the primary guide in determining what speeds the majority of safe and reasonable drivers are traveling. Therefore, the practice is to set the speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment from the critical speed unless other factors require a lower limit. Speed limits set on this basis provide law enforcement officials with a means of controlling reckless or unreliable drivers who will not conform to what the majority finds reasonable.

2. The 10 -mph Pace. The 10 -mph Pace is the 10 -mph increment range, which contains the largest number of recorded vehicles. The pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. Speed limits should normally be set to fall within the 10 -mph pace. However, conditions not readily apparent to the driver or adhering to State mandated limits such as in Residence Districts may require setting speed limits below the 10-mph pace.

3. 50th Percentile Speed. The Median Speed, or 50 th Percentile Speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50 percent of the vehicles travel faster than and 50 percent travel slower than, the median speed. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution. Typically speed limits should not be set below the 50 th Percentile Speed, since it would result in greater than 50-percent of the drivers exceeding the speed limit.

4. 15th Percentile Speed. The 15th Percentile Speed is that speed at or below which 15 percent of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential.

5. Percent of Vehicles in Pace Speed . The percent of vehicles in the 10 -mph pace speed is an indication of the grouping of vehicular speeds. Ideally, if all vehicles were traveling at or about the same speed, there would be a reduced likelihood of vehicular collisions. In speed limit analysis, the higher the percent of vehicles within the pace speed, the more favorable the speed distribution. The percent of the 10-mph pace is often between 60 and 90 percent.

EXHIBIT B
26 City of Marina 13 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

2.3 2014 California MUTCD and CVC Guidance
Based on the 2014 California MUTCD, “When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2))”5.

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.

Table 2B-104 (CA) in the MUTCD shows an example of rounding and additional speed reduction6.

In matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a reduction of the posted speed limit by 5 mph due to specific factors such as road characteristics , the pace speed, roadside development and environment, pedestrian activity, and collision history. The following are some other factors to consider when establishing speed limits between adjacent street segments:

1. Avoid Short Segments. Short speed zones of less than ½ mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

2. Change in Roadway Conditions or Roadside Development. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

5 California Department of Transportation, 2014 California MUTCD, Chapter 2B, page 134, Revised January 6, 2023.
6 California Department of Transportation, 2014 California MUTCD, Chapter 2B, page 259, Revised February 6, 2023.

EXHIBIT B
27 City of Marina 14 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

3. Minimize Change in Speed between Adjacent Segments. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

4. Coordinate Speed Zoning with Adjacent Jurisdictions.

Excerpts from the MUTCD are attached in the Appendix B.

2.4 Data Collection
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data and radar speed surveys with calibrated radar gun were conducted by IDAX, during the month of December 2024 at all forty-five (45) study segments. An effort was made to ensure that the radar speed data is collected without affecting the speed of the vehicles traveling along the study segments. The radar speed data was collected on a typical day with fair-weather conditions. Kimley-Horn conducted field visits along each study segments to gather roadway characteristics, including but not limited to number of lanes in each direction, presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, on-street parking, sidewalks , driveways, horizontal/vertical curves, adjacent land uses, etc.

The ADT data was used to determine the accident rates and recommended speed limit for each study segments. Radar Speed Survey data and Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data is attached in Appendix D and Appendix F. The calibration certificate for the radar gun is attached in Appendix E.

2.5 Collision History
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments. The collision information was obtained from the City from January 2019 to December 2021. The collisions were reviewed and corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized intersections , signs, or alcohol and drug influence, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 3-year period and ADT counts, a collision rate per million vehicle miles was calculated for each segment. To provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for similar types of local roadways, the collision rates for each segment were compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, collisions, collision rates) as listed in Table 2.

Table 2: 2022 California State Highways Collision Rates

EXHIBIT B
28 City of Marina 15 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Lane Type Total Collision Rate Per Million Vehicle Miles (3-year rates for 2020, 2021, and 2022)
2&3 Lanes 1.07
4 lanes (undivided highway) 1.33
4 lanes (divided highway) 0.99
Because of the urban area of the City’s Street network, crash rates for Urban (Inside City) from the 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways was used.

The current collision rate for each segment was calculated using the formula below:

• N – Total number of collisions along the study segment • ADT – Average Daily Traffic along study segment
• L – Length of segment in miles
• Y – Number of years of collision data

The collision history for the Years 20 20, 202 1, and 202 2 at the study segments is summarized in Error! Reference source not found. below:

EXHIBIT B
29 City of Marina 16 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 3: Collision History Summary at Study Segments (2020-2022) # Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 2020 2021 2022 2020, 2021, 2022 Collisions PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL 1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 4 2 1 7 2 1 1 4 9 1 10 21 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 4 4 3 4 7 3 3 6 17 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservation Road 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 3 9 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0 0 0 0 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0 0 0 0 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0 0 0 0 7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 1 1 1 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Avenue 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 6 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0 0 0 0 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 0 0 0 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 0 5 5 5 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0 0 0 0 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0 0 0 0 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0 0 0 0 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0 0 0 0 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 0 0 1 1 1 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 1 1 1 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0 0 0 0 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0 0 0 0 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0 0 0 0 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 0 1 1 1 27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 0 0 0 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0 0 0 0 29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostick Avenue
California Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0
30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0 0 1 1 1 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 0 0 0 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 0 0 0 0 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Avenue 0 0 0 0 35 Crescent Street Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0 0 0 0 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 1 1 1 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0

EXHIBIT B
30 City of Marina 17 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
# Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 2020 2021 2022 2020, 2021, 2022 Collisions PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 0 0 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 0 0 0 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 0 0 0 0 45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 Notes:

PDO - Property Damage Only, COP - Complaint of Pain, VIS - Visible Injury, SEV - Severe Injury, FAT – Fatal

EXHIBIT B
31 City of Marina 18 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 4: Collision Rate Summary at Study Segments

#

Street Name
Segment 2019, 2020, 2021
Collisions
ADT/Avg
ADT
Distance (Ft) Distance (Mi) Segment CR Expected CR Segment CR > Expected CR?
Limit 1

Limit 2
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 21 25,688 4,752 0.9 0.83 0.99 No 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 17 20,534 10,560 2.00 0.44 1.07 No 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservation Road 9 22,304 4,752 0.9 0.41 0.99 No 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0 9,121 2,640 0.5 0.00 0.99 No 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0 5,302 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0 7,348 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 1 6,596 3,168 0.6 0.46 1.07 No 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Avenue 6 18,593 2,640 0.5 0.69 0.99 No 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0 17,187 2,640 0.5 0.21 0.99 No 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 14,699 2,112 0.4 0.00 0.99 No 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 5 16,027 4,224 0.8 0.50 1.33 No 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0 30,285 3,696 0.7 0.39 0.99 No 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0 1,037 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0 4,295 3,168 0.6 0.00 1.07 No 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0 2,528 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 1 7,573 3,168 0.6 0.20 1.07 No 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0 8,306 2,112 0.4 0.27 1.07 No 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 1 6,012 1,584 0.3 2.03 1.07 Yes 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 0 1,749 2,640 0.5 2.09 1.07 Yes 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Road 0 1,353 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 3,528 1,584 0.3 0.86 1.07 No 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0 2,458 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0 2,598 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 5,842 1,584 0.3 0.52 1.07 No 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0 6,430 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkway 1 8,725 3,696 0.7 0.30 1.07 No 27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 851 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0 3,372 5,280 1.0 0.00 1.07 No 29 Reindollar Avenue/Bostick Avenue California Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 1,690 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 1 3,704 7,392 1.4 0.70 1.07 No 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 812 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 264 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 0 657 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Avenue 0 661 3,168 0.6 2.30 1.07 Yes 35 Crescent Street Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0 1,304 528 0.1 0.00 1.07 No 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 1,515 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 1 3,992 1,584 0.3 1.53 1.07 Yes 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 2,854 528 0.1 0.00 1.07 No 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 0 1,521 2,112 0.4 1.50 1.07 Yes

EXHIBIT B
32 City of Marina 19 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment 2019, 2020, 2021
Collisions
ADT/Avg
ADT
Distance (Ft) Distance (Mi) Segment CR Expected CR Segment CR > Expected CR?
Limit 1

Limit 2
40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 0 2,878 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 0 2,360 1,056 0.2 1.93 1.07 Yes 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0 2,110 3,168 0.6 0.00 1.07 No 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 981 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 0 2,667 5,808 1.1 0.00 1.07 No 45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 2,407 5,808 1.1 0.00 1.07 No

EXHIBIT B
33 City of Marina 20 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

3.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations contained in this report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. Prima facie limits attempt to advise the motorist and enforcement of the reasonable speed for a particular section of roadway for the prevailing conditions. In many cases, the recommendations made produce a uniform speed limit along the road.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey (ET&S) forms, presented in the Appendix C, illustrate the results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and indicate a recommended speed limit for each of the street segments surveyed. A summary of the data analysis, along with recommended speed limits can be found in . The recommended speed limit for each segment is shown in Figure 1.

EXHIBIT B
34 City of Marina 21 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 5: Speed Survey Recommendations

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
1 Imjin Parkway State
Route 1 California Avenue 50 50 0.83 0.99 No Yes 45 -5
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway with divided median and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 21 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The 85th percentile speed of 50 mph observed is equal to the existing posted speed limit.

With one fatal and one serious injury crash involving pedestrian/bicyclists, the crash density is higher than other segments. The segment meets the definition of safety corridor and the 85th percentile speed can be further lowered by 5 mph to 45 mph.
2 Imjin Parkway California
Avenue Reservation Road 25 39.15 0.44 1.07 No No N/A (See Note 1)
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 20 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
3 Del Monte
Boulevard
SR1/Reind
ollar
Avenue
Reservation Road 40 45.10 0.41 0.99 No Yes 35 -5
Del Monte Boulevard between SR1/Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph.

The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, if no further reductions are used.

Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, vulnerable population, and crash severity. Therefore it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph.
4 Del Monte
Boulevard
Reservatio
n Road Beach Road 40 42 0.00 0.99 No Yes 30 -10
Del Monte Boulevard between Reservation Road and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 42 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile

EXHIBIT B
35 City of Marina 22 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, and vulnerable population. Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph
The existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is reduced to 30 mph. 5 Del Monte
Boulevard
Beach
Road
Marina Greens
Drive 40 45.15 0.00 1.07 No No 40
Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , bike route, and multiple driveways justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
6 Reservation
Road
Dunes
Drive Beach Road 35 34 0.00 1.07 No No 35
Reservation Road between Dunes Drive and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, and vertical/horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

EXHIBIT B
36 City of Marina 23 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
7 Reservation
Road
Beach
Road
Del Monte
Boulevard 30 33.15 0.46 1.07 No No 30
Reservation Road between Beach Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalks, driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 8 Reservation
Road
Del Monte
Boulevard Crescent Avenue 35 39 0.69 0.99 No No 35
Reservation Road between Del Monte Boulevard and Crescent Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 39 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 9 Reservation
Road
Crescent
Avenue California Avenue 40 43 0.21 0.99 No No 40
Reservation Road between Crescent Avenue and California Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 43 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

EXHIBIT B
37 City of Marina 24 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
10 Reservation
Road
California
Avenue Salinas Avenue 45 51 0.00 0.99 No No 40 -5
Reservation Road between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 51 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, Two-Way Left Turn (TWLT) lane, multiple driveways, and horizontal/vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The land use characteristics changes from vacant land (i.e., along Roadway Segment No. 11: Reservation Road – From Salinas to Imjin Parkway) to industrial/residential adjacent to this segment. The resulting speed limit of 45 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 40 mph, a 5-mph reduction in speed limit.

The existing posted speed limit of 45 mph is reduced to 40 mph. 11 Reservation
Road
Salinas
Avenue Imjin Parkway 55 57 0.50 1.33 No No 50 -5
Reservation Road between Salinas Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 57 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The existing posted speed limit of 55 mph is reduced to 50 mph. 12 Reservation
Road
Imjin
Parkway Blanco Road 55 60.15 0.39 0.99 No No 55
Reservation Road between Imjin Parkway and and Blanco Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 60.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the

EXHIBIT B
38 City of Marina 25 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 60 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
13 8th Street 2nd
Avenue 3rd Avenue 25 32.60 0.00 1.07 No No 25
8th Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32.6 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lane and surrounding residential land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
14 8th Street 5th
Avenue
Inter-Garrison
Road 40 41 0.00 1.07 No No 35 -5
8th Street between 5th Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of driveways, limited visibility, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
15 9th Street 1st
Avenue 2nd Avenue 30 31 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
9th Street between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of

EXHIBIT B
39 City of Marina 26 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalk, nature of surrounding land uses, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
16 2nd Avenue Divarty
Street 8th Street 45 46 0.20 1.07 No No 40 -5
2nd Avenue between Divarty Street and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 46 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
2nd Avenue from 8th Avenue to Imjin Parkway, has a posted speed limit of 35 mph.

It is recommended that adjacent sections of a corridor do not have a posted speed limit difference of more than 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 35 36 0.27 1.07 No No 35 2nd Avenue between 8th Street and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing

EXHIBIT B
40 City of Marina 27 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
posted speed limit of 35 mph is retained.
18 Beach Road Reservatio
n Road
Del Monte
Boulevard 35 35 2.03 1.07 Yes No 30 -5
Beach Road between Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Higher collision rate than statewide average (involving 1 severe injury), presence on uncontrolled crosswalks, horizontal/vertical curves, and merge/diverge lanes justify further reduction in the resulting 85th percentile speed limit . Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is reduced to 30 mph. 19 De Forest
Road
Beach
Road Reservation Road 30 36 2.09 1.07 Yes No 30
Del Forest Road between Beach Road and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 29 mph to 38 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
20 Crescent
Avenue
Quebrada
Del Mar Reservation Road 25 32 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Crescent Avenue between Quebrada Del Mar and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile

EXHIBIT B
41 City of Marina 28 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
21 Crescent
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Carmel Avenue 30 36 0.86 1.07 No No 30
Crescent Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a collector per the General Plan. There speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
22 Cardoza
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Aaron Way (End) 30 35 0.00 1.07 No No 30
Cardoza Avenue between Reservation Road and Aaron Way is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
23 Beach Road Del Monte
Boulevard De Forest Road 30 28 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Beach Road between Del Monte Boulevard and De Forest Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

EXHIBIT B
42 City of Marina 29 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
The presence of elementary school, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 24 California
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Carmel Avenue 30 37 0.52 1.07 No No 30
California Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 37 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
25 California
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue 25 32 0.00 1.07 No No 25
California Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, residential land uses, vertical curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5..

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
26 California
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Imjin Parkway 40 45 0.30 1.07 No No 40
California Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate

EXHIBIT B
43 City of Marina 30 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II Bike Lanes, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is retained.
27 California
Avenue
Imjin
Parkway 8th Street 30 28 0.00 1.07 No No 30
California Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
28 Reindollar
Avenue
Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 25 34 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Reindollar Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph.

The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostic
k Avenue
California
Avenue Carmel Avenue 30 33 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Reindollar Avenue between California Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision

EXHIBIT B
44 City of Marina 31 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 30 Carmel
Avenue
Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 25 31 0.70 1.07 No No 25
Carmel Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
31 Carmel
Avenue
California
Avenue Salinas Avenue 25 29 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Carmel Avenue between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, uncontrolled crosswalk, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 32 Salinas
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue Reservation Road 25 24 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Salinas Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 24 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a)

EXHIBIT B
45 City of Marina 32 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
33 Paul Davis
Drive
Healy
Avenue
Marina Greens
Drive 30 25 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Paul Davis Drive between Healy Avenue and Marina Greens Drive is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 25 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justifies lowering the speed limit. It is recommended that the observed 85th percentile speed limit of 25 mph is adopted for this segment.
34 Patton
Parkway
Marina
High
School
California Avenue 40 41 2.30 1.07 Yes No 35 -5
Patton Parkway between Marina High School and California Avenue is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph.

The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The presence of bike routes, horizontal/vertical curves, and residential/school land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
35 Crescent
Street
Patton
Parkway
Reindollar
Avenue 25 30 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Crescent Street between Patton Parkway and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 30 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision

EXHIBIT B
46 City of Marina 33 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 36 Vaughan
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 29 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Vaughan Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 37 Seacrest
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue Reservation Road 30 31.15 1.53 1.07 Yes No 30
Seacrest Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained. 38 Sunset
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 31 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Sunset Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for

EXHIBIT B
47 City of Marina 34 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
39 Lake Drive Palm
Avenue Reservation Road 25 36 1.50 1.07 Yes No 25
Lake Drive between Palm Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph.

Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of on-street parking, driveways and surrounding residential land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte
Boulevard 25 28 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Palm Avenue between Lake Drive and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 41 Abrams Drive Preston
Drive Imjin Parkway 30 34 1.93 1.07 Yes No 30
Abrams Drive between Preston Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35

EXHIBIT B
48 City of Marina 35 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
mph..

Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of horizontal and vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 42 Preston Drive Abrams
Drive Imjin Parkway 30 29.15 0.00 1.07 No No 30
Preston Drive between Abrams Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of driveways, park, residential land uses, horizontal and vertical curves further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
43 3rd Avenue Imjin
Parkway 8th Street 25 27 0.00 1.07 No No 25
3rd Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 27 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free- flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph.

The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, residential and commercial land uses further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
44 Abrams Drive Imjin
Parkway
Preston Drive 25 35.15 0.00 1.07 No No 25 Abrams Drive between Imjin Parkway and Preston Drive is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data

EXHIBIT B
49 City of Marina 36 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
(West) collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, horizontal and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The resulting speed limit of 30 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is therefore recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 25 mph, which is the existing posted speed limit.

It should be noted that this segment was not included in the previous ‘Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS)’ study conducted by the City. Therefore, ‘CVC Section 22358.8’ as identified in AB 43, which allows local authorities to retain current speed limit or restore immediately prior speed limit, cannot be used.

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
45 Marina
Heights Drive
California
Avenue Imjin Parkway 25 34 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Marina Heights Drive between California Avenue and Imjin Pakrway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, horizontal and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

The resulting speed limit of 30 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is therefore recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 25 mph, which is the existing posted speed limit.

It should be noted that this segment was not included in the previous ‘Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS)’ study conducted by the City. Therefore, ‘CVC Section 22358.8’ as identified in AB 43, which allows local authorities to retain current

EXHIBIT B
50 City of Marina 37 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

#

Street Name
Segment

Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)

Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1

Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)

Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
speed limit or restore immediately prior speed limit, cannot be used.

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

Notes:

1. None. Imjin Parkway from California Avenue to Reservation Road is currently under construction.

EXHIBIT B
51 City of Marina 38 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Figure 2: City of Marina Recommended Speed Limits

EXHIBIT B
52 City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

App
endix A
California Vehicle Code (CVC) - Applicable Sections

EXHIBIT B
53 Cal. Veh. Code § 627
Section 627 - "Engineering and traffic survey" defined
(a)"Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1)Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2)Accident records.
(3)Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c)When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1)Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B)Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C)The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2)Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Ca. Veh. Code § 627
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 1, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2000 ch 45 (AB 2767), s 1, eff. 1/1/2001. 1 EXHIBIT B
54 Cal. Veh. Code § 21400
Section 21400 - Uniform standards and specifications for official traffic control devices (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. (c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. (d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 21400
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 2, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2011 ch 528 (AB 529),s 2, eff. 1/1/2012. 1 EXHIBIT B
55 Cal. Veh. Code § 22352
Section 22352 - Prima facie limits
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:
(1)When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway.

This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2)When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3)On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1)On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
(2)When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3)When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
1 EXHIBIT B
56 erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22352
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 3, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2015 ch 12 (AB 95),s 15, eff. 6/24/2015.

Amended by Stats 2013 ch 240 (AB 707),s 1, eff. 1/1/2013. 2 Section 22352 - Prima facie limits Cal. Veh. Code § 22352

EXHIBIT B
57 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Section 22358.6 - Rounding speed limits in relation to free-flowing traffic (a)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable. (c)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b). (d)In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e)The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 2, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 6, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
58 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Section 22358.7 - Reducing speed limits
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1)The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2)The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b)
(1)As used in this section, "safety corridor" shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c)A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 7, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
59 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Section 22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b)This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
(c)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
60 Cal. Veh. Code § 627
Section 627 - "Engineering and traffic survey" defined
(a)"Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1)Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2)Accident records.
(3)Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c)When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1)Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B)Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C)The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2)Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Ca. Veh. Code § 627
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 1, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2000 ch 45 (AB 2767), s 1, eff. 1/1/2001. 1 EXHIBIT B
61 Cal. Veh. Code § 21400
Section 21400 - Uniform standards and specifications for official traffic control devices (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. (c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. (d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 21400
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 2, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2011 ch 528 (AB 529),s 2, eff. 1/1/2012. 1 EXHIBIT B
62 Cal. Veh. Code § 22352
Section 22352 - Prima facie limits
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:
(1)When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway.

This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2)When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3)On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1)On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
(2)When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3)When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
1 EXHIBIT B
63 erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22352
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 3, eff. 1/1/2022.

Amended by Stats 2015 ch 12 (AB 95),s 15, eff. 6/24/2015.

Amended by Stats 2013 ch 240 (AB 707),s 1, eff. 1/1/2013. 2 Section 22352 - Prima facie limits Cal. Veh. Code § 22352

EXHIBIT B
64 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Section 22358.6 - Rounding speed limits in relation to free-flowing traffic (a)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable. (c)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b). (d)In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e)The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 2, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 6, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
65 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Section 22358.7 - Reducing speed limits
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1)The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2)The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b)
(1)As used in this section, "safety corridor" shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c)A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 7, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
66 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Section 22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b)This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
(c)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 EXHIBIT B
67 City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

App
endix B
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) –
Applicable Sections

EXHIBIT B
68 EXHIBIT B
69 EXHIBIT B
70 EXHIBIT B
71 EXHIBIT B
72 EXHIBIT B
73 EXHIBIT B
74 EXHIBIT B
75 EXHIBIT B
76 EXHIBIT B
77 City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

Appendix C
Eng
ineering and Traffic Survey Forms

EXHIBIT B
78 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 450 ft West of Imjin Pkwy and 3rd Ave Posted Speed Limit 50 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:22 AM - 12:00 PM Recommended Speed Limit45 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)46.5 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 50 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 42 - 51 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 21
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.83
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 25,688 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 4th Ave, 3rd Ave, and State Route Ramps Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.9 mi
Width 70 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Expressway
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Public facilities, Commercial, and Residental

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway with divided median and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 21 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The 85th percentile speed of 50 mph observed is equal to the existing posted speed limit.

With one fatal and one serious injury crash involving pedestrian/bicyclists, the crash density is higher than other segments. The segment meets the definition of safety corridor and the 85th percentile speed can be further lowered by 5 mph to 45 mph.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Imjin Parkway
State Route 1
1 EXHIBIT B
79 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 200 ft West of Imjin Pkwy and Abrams Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:27 AM - 11:53 AM Recommended Speed Limit NA 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36.5 MPH Speed Limit Change NA 85th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 32 - 41 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 20
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.44
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20,534
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Abrams Dr and 3rd Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 2 mi
Width 52 - 72 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1 Imjin Rd to California Ave EB - 2 WB-2 Street Classification 4-Lane Expressway
Divided Median? No There is a median between Imjin Rd and California Ave Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Unidentified - under construction
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Mostly Parks and Open Space, Public facilities and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 20 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. Imjin Parkway from California Avenue to Reservation Road is currently under construction.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Imjin Parkway
California Ave
2 EXHIBIT B
80 STREET: SURVEY DATE: ########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 105 ft south of Del Monte Blvd and Cypress AvePosted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:23 AM - 9:46 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)40.5 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 45 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 36 - 45 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 9
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.41
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 22,304 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Cypress Ave, Carmel Ave, and Mortimer Ln Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.9 mi
Width 88 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? Yes (Class I)
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential and Public facilities

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between SR1/Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, if no further reductions are used.

Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, vulnerable population, and crash severity. Therefore it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar Ave
3 EXHIBIT B
81 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Beach Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.2 mile south of Del Monte Rd and Beach RdPosted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:35 AM - 9:50 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)39 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 10 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 42 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 35 - 44 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 9,121 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Beach Rd
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Public facilities and Parks and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between Reservation Road and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 42 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, and vulnerable population.

Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph The existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is reduced to 30 mph.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
Reservation Road
4 EXHIBIT B
82 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Marina Greens Drive

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 240 ft south of Cosky Dr Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:05 AM - 9:30 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)41 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 45.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 36 - 45 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5,302 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Beach Rd, stop controlled at Marina Green Dr, Cosky Dr, and Cypress Knolls Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 60 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes - On west side
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Industrial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , bike route, and multiple driveways justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
Beach Road
5 EXHIBIT B
83 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Beach Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 120 ft west of Cardoza Ave Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:27 AM - 2:50 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7,348 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Dunes Dr, Hwy 1 off -ramp and on-ramp Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 43-69 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1 EB-2 and WB-2 at Cardoza Ave
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (One-side from Dunes Dr to Off-Ramp) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Dunes Drive and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, and vertical/horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Dunes Drive
6 EXHIBIT B
84 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 410 ft north of Seaside Cir & Seaside Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:52 PM - 3:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29.5 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 33.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 26 - 35 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.46
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,596 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Seaside Cir and Robin Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 80 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at roundabouts
On-Street Parking? No (Only one-side right before Del Monte Blvd) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Parks and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Beach Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalks, driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Beach Road
7 EXHIBIT B
85 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: Crescent Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Eucalyptus St Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:52 AM - 12:40 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 32 - 41 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 7
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.69
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18,593 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Eucalyptus St Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 92 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (right before Crescent Avenue and few other segments) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial and Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Del Monte Boulevard and Crescent Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 39 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Del Monte Boulevard
8 EXHIBIT B
86 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 290 ft east of Crescent Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:15 AM - 11:48 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)39 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 43 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 35 - 44 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 17,187 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Crestview Ct and Ocean Terrace Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 89 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes - TWLT Before California Ave
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (2 Hr Parking)
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential, Parks and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Crescent Avenue and California Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 43 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Crescent Avenue
9 EXHIBIT B
87 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Salinas Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Lynscott Dr Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:28 PM - 1:57 PM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)46 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 51 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 41 - 50 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14,699 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Lynscott Dr, Bayer St, and Salinas Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 88 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes - TWLT
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II ends at Salinas Ave)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial and Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
California Avenue
Reservation Road between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 51 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph.

The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, Two-Way Left Turn (TWLT) lane, multiple driveways, and horizontal/vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The land use characteristics changes from vacant land (i.e., along Roadway Segment No. 11: Reservation Road – From Salinas to Imjin Parkway) to industrial/residential adjacent to this segment. The resulting speed limit of 45 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 40 mph, a 5-mph reduction in speed limit.

The existing posted speed limit of 45 mph is reduced to 40 mph. 10 EXHIBIT B
88 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 640 ft west of Imjin Rd and Imjin Pkwy Posted Speed Limit 55 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:02 PM - 1:26 PM Recommended Speed Limit 50 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)50 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 57 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 46 - 55 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 7
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.50
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.33

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16,027 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Salinas Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.8 mi
Width 63 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes (One-side and starts at Salinas Ave) Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Public facilitites, Parks and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Salinas Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 57 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The existing posted speed limit of 55 mph is reduced to 50 mph.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Salinas Avenue
11 EXHIBIT B
89 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Blanco Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 975 ft east of Imjin Pkwy Posted Speed Limit 55 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:39 PM - 12:58 PM Recommended Speed Limit 55 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)55 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 60.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 50 - 59 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 9
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.39
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 30,285 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control All Signalized
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.7 mi
Width 94 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-3 WB-3 2 lanes from Imjin to Blanco and 3 lanes from Blanco to Imjin Pkwy Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (From Mbest Dr to Imjin Pkwy and from Imjin Pkwy to Blanco Rd) Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, Parks and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Imjin Parkway and and Blanco Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 60.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 60 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Imjin Parkway
12 EXHIBIT B
90 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/19/2024
FROM: TO: 3rd Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Bluewater Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:18 AM - 11:18 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 32.6 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.7%
Number of Survey Samples 57

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,037 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 2nd Ave, Bluewater Ct, Lighthouse Ln, Sandy Clay Ln, and 3rd Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 48 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential and public facilities

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
8th Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32.6 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II bike lane and surrounding residential land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
8th Street
2nd Avenue
13 EXHIBIT B
91 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: Inter-Garrison Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.1 mile west of Inter-Garrison Rd Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:50 PM - 3:52 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPG 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 41 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 30 - 39 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 4,295 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 5th St, Imjin Rd, Engineering Equipment Rd, and Inter-Garrison Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 31 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Limited along certain sections
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities and Commerical

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
8th Street between 5th Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of driveways, limited visibility, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
8th Street
5th Avenue
14 EXHIBIT B
92 STREET: SURVEY DATE: #######
FROM: TO: 2nd Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 380 ft west of 2nd Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:04 PM - 12:41 PM Recommended Speed Limit25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,528 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 1st Ave and 2nd Ave and a Roundabout Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 41 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?At Roundabout
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Hospital, public facilities and open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
9th Street between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalk, nature of surrounding land uses, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9th Street
1st Avenue
15 EXHIBIT B
93 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At 5th Street Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM - 9:42 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)42 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 46 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 38 - 47 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.20
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7,573 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 8th street, 6th street, 5th street, Inter-Garrison Rd, and Divarty Street Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? Yes
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes - Not Connected
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities, and Open spaces

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
2nd Avenue between Divarty Street and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 46 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. 2nd Avenue from 8th Avenue to Imjin Parkway, has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It is recommended that adjacent sections of a corridor do not have a posted speed limit difference of more than 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2nd Avenue
Divarty Street
16 EXHIBIT B
94 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 305 ft north of 9th Street Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:45 AM - 10:26 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 29 - 38 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8,306 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Jetty Street, 10th Street, 9th Street , and 8th Street Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2 NB-1 and SB-1 after General Stilwell Drive Street Classification Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (Only one-side and after 9th Street on both-side) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
2nd Avenue between 8th Street and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2nd Avenue
8th Street
17 EXHIBIT B
95 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 350 ft east of Reservation Road Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:55 AM - 10:20 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)30 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 35 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 4
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 2.03
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,012 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Del Monte Blvd and Stop Controlled at Marina Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 54 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at roundbaout
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Beach Road between Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Higher collision rate than statewide average (involving 1 severe injury), presence on uncontrolled crosswalks, horizontal/vertical curves, and merge/diverge lanes justify further reduction in the resulting 85th percentile speed limit . Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is reduced to 30 mph.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Beach Road
Reservation Road
18 EXHIBIT B
96 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 50 FT north of George Way Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:17 AM - 10:24 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 29 - 38 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,749 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at George Way, Oak Cir, and Costa Del Mar Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?RRFB
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Forest Road between Beach Road and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 29 mph to 38 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
De Forest Road
Beach Road
19 EXHIBIT B
97 STREET: SURVEY DATE: ########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 115 ft south of Tallmon St Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:28 AM - 11:06 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,353 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Shuler Cir, Tallmon St, Whitney Pl & Quebrada Del Mar Rd, Roundabout at Costa & Sirena Del Mar Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 63 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? Yes - Small Median
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Crescent Avenue between Quebrada Del Mar and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Avenue
Quebrada Del Mar
20 EXHIBIT B
98 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.1 mile north of Carmel Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:22 AM - 10:44 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)31 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 27 - 36 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,528 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 48 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Crescent Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a collector per the General Plan. There speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Avenue
Reservation Road
21 EXHIBIT B
99 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Aaron Way (End)

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 125 ft south of Abdy Way Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:30 AM - 12:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 35 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,458 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 62 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1 Wide lanes
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II - South of Belle Dr to Reservation Rd) Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes At Abdy Way
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Cardoza Avenue between Reservation Road and Aaron Way is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Cardoza Avenue
Reservation Road
Stop controlled at Dolphin Cir, Abdy Way, Ora Ct, Belle Dr, Redondo Ct, Brookside Pl, Lakewood Dr, and Aaron Way
22 EXHIBIT B
100
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: De Forest Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 205 ft west of Melanie Rd Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:23 AM - 11:13 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)24 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 18 - 27 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,598 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Del Monte Blvd, Stop controlled at Michael Dr, Fitzgerald Cir, and Villa Cir Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - Infront of Lone Olson Elementary School with RRFB On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes - Missing at short segments
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and School

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Beach Road between Del Monte Boulevard and De Forest Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of elementary school, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Beach Road
Del Monte Boulevard
23 EXHIBIT B
101
STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At O'Sullivan Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:19 AM - 10:43 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 28 - 37 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.52
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5,842 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 52 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes - One the east side
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 37 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Reservation Road
24 EXHIBIT B
102
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Reindollar Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Helena Way Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:50 AM - 10:16 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,430 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave, Karen Ct, Helena Way, Tamara Ct, and Reindollar Avenue Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 30 - 62 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and School

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, residential land uses, vertical curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5..

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Carmel Avenue
25 EXHIBIT B
103
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 128 ft north of 3rd Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:23 AM - 9:46 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)40 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 45 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 37 - 46 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.30
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8,725 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Reindollar Ave, Patton Pkwy, 3rd Ave, and Marina Hts Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.7 mi
Width 35 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II and ends before Patton Pkwy)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at Marina Hts Dr with HAWK
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes - On west side
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities , Open spaces and Park

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of Class II Bike Lanes, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Reindollar Ave
26 EXHIBIT B
104
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 320 ft north of 9th St Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:48 PM - 2:48 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 20 - 29 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87.9%
Number of Survey Samples 58

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 851 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Beacon Dr, 5th Ave, 9th St, and 8th St Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 27 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes - One side only
Sidewalks? Yes - One side only
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities , Open spaces, and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing speed limit is 30 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Imjin Parkway
27 EXHIBIT B
105
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 65 ft west of Vera Ln Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:24 AM - 11:47 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,372 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.0 mi
Width 42 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Grant St
On-Street Parking? Yes (2 Hr Parking)
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, and Park

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reindollar Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

Stop controlled at Sunset Ave, Owen Ave, Zanetta Dr, Talcott Ave, Max Cir, Vera Ln, Crescent St, Vaughan Ave, Ellen St, Kennedy Ct, King Cir, Redwood Dr, and Independence Ave

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reindollar Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard
28 EXHIBIT B
106
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Sunrise Cir and Sunrise Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:44 PM - 1:26 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,690 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Sunrise Ave
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop Controlled at California Ave, Westwood Ct, Eddy St, Phillips Cir, Sunrise Ave, and Mildred Ct Reindollar Avenue between California Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reindollar Avenue
California Avenue
29 EXHIBIT B
107
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 155 ft east of Vaughan Ave Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 3:27 PM - 4:10 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 98.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.18
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,704 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.4 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Pleasant Cir
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Marina Vista Elementary School

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Del Monte Blvd, Elm Ave, Sunset Ave, Seacrest Ave, Zanetta Dr, Crescent Ave, Vaughan Ave, Everett Dr, Pleasant Cir, Redwood Dr, and Califronia Ave Carmel Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Carmel Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard
30 EXHIBIT B
108
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Salinas Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 165 ft east of Lynscott Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:49 AM - 12:39 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)25 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 812 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 39 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Lynscott Dr There is a bus pick-up/Drop-off zone sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Crumpton Elementary School

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave, Bradley Cir, Carmelo Cir, Lynscott Dr, Barrett Ln, Bayer Ave, and Salinas Ave Carmel Avenue between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph.

The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, uncontrolled crosswalk, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Carmel Avenue
California Avenue
31 EXHIBIT B
109
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 90 ft south of Lavell Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:05 PM - 4:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)19 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 24 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 16 - 25 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 93.4%
Number of Survey Samples 91

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 264 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 18 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Lynscott Dr
On-Street Parking? Yes - No Sign
Sidewalks? Yes - on one side only
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Reservation Rd, Ellis Ct, and Carmel Ave Salinas Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 24 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Salinas Avenue
Carmel Avenue
32 EXHIBIT B
110
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Marina Greens Drive

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 370 ft south of Marina Green Dr Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:10 PM - 2:10 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)21 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 17 - 26 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 657 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification Local
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Healy Avenue
Paul Davis Drive between Healy Avenue and Marina Greens Drive is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 25 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

Presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justifies lowering the speed limit. It is recommended that the observed 85th percentile speed limit of 25 mph is adopted for this segment.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Paul Davis Drive
Healy Avenue
33 EXHIBIT B
111
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.2 mi west of California Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:25 PM - 3:25 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 41 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 34 - 43 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.1%
Number of Survey Samples 59

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 661 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 29 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Marina High School

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave and Crescent St
Patton Parkway between Marina High School and California Avenue is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph.

The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The presence of bike routes, horizontal/vertical curves, and residential/school land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Patton Parkway
Marina High School
34 EXHIBIT B
112
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Reindollar Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 405 ft south of Reindollar Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 3:06 PM - 4:09 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,304 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.1 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Patton Pkwy and Reindollar Ave
Crescent Street between Patton Parkway and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 30 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Street
Patton Parkway
35 EXHIBIT B
113
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 390 ft north of Reindollar Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:47 AM - 11:19 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 21 - 30 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,515 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 33 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Reindollar Ave, Hillcrest Ave, and Carmel Ave Vaughan Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Vaughn Avenue
Reindollar Avenue
36 EXHIBIT B
114
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 535 ft south of Reservation Rd Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:50 AM - 10:19 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.53
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,992 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Seacrest Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Seacrest Avenue
Carmel Avenue
37 EXHIBIT B
115
STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 175 ft south of Hillcrest Ave Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:45 PM - 1:18 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.1%
Number of Survey Samples 101

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,854 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.1 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Hillcrest Ave, Cypress Ave, and Reindollar Ave Sunset Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Sunset Avenue
Reindollar Avenue
38 EXHIBIT B
116
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 100 ft north of Messinger Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:56 AM - 12:31 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32.5 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 27 - 36 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,521 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Ped
estrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks? No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Palm Ave, Messinger Dr, Paddon Pl, and Robin Dr Lake Drive between Palm Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph.

Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of on-street parking, driveways and surrounding residential land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Lake Drive
Palm Avenue
39 EXHIBIT B
117
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 510 ft east of Lake Drive Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:00 PM - 12:48 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 100.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,878 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 40 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Lake Dr and Marina Dr
Palm Avenue between Lake Drive and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph.

The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Palm Avenue
Lake Drive
40 EXHIBIT B
118
STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 60 ft south of Brostorm Drive Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:49 AM - 11:06 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,360 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 33 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No - Red curb
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Preston Dr, Lexington Ct, and Brostorm Dr Abrams Drive between Preston Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph..

Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of horizontal and vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Abrams Drive
Preston Drive
41 EXHIBIT B
119
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 85 ft west of Wahl Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:09 AM - 12:24 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,110 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 22 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No - Red curb
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Abrams Dr, Barth Ct, Horn Ct, Wahl Ct, Wittenmyer Ct, Bandholtz Ct, Brown Ct, Landrum Ct, and Ready Ct
Preston Drive between Abrams Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of driveways, park, residential land uses, horizontal and vertical curves further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Preston Drive
Abrams Drive
42 EXHIBIT B
120
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 195 ft north of 10th St Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:30 AM - 11:18 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)24 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 27 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 20 - 29 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 981 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 31 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No - Just small segment near Imjin Pkwy had median Designated Bike Route? Yes - There is a sign
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Imjin Pkwy, Telegraph Blvd, 10th St, Boardwalk Ave, 9th St, and 8th St 3rd Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph.

The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 27 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, residential and commercial land uses further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3rd Avenue
Imjin Parkway
43 EXHIBIT B
121
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Preston Drive

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 130 ft west of Inchon Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:26 PM - 3:02 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)30 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 35.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,667 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.1 mi
Width 49 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No - Just small segment near Imjin Pkwy had median Designated Bike Route? Yes - There is a sign
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Bluffs Dr There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Imjin Pkwy, Brostorm Dr, Wilson Ct, Bayonet Ct, and Preston Dr. Traffic circles at MacArthur Dr, 3rd Ave, and Denall Dr

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Abrams Drive
Imjin Pkwy (west)
Abrams Drive between Imjin Parkway and Preston Drive is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, horizontal and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The resulting speed limit of 30 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is therefore recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 25 mph, which is the existing posted speed limit.

It should be noted that this segment was not included in the previous ‘Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS)’ study conducted by the City. Therefore, ‘CVC Section 22358.8’ as identified in AB 43, which allows local authorities to retain current speed limit or restore immediately prior speed limit, cannot be used.

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
44 EXHIBIT B
122
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Pkwy

SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 450 ft west of Arroyo Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:39 PM - 2:21 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100

COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,407 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.1 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No - After Bluffs Dr there is bike lane on both side Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes - After Bonte Dr on both side
Sidewalks? Yes - Only one side
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation

COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave, Arroyo Dr, and Imjin Pkwy. Traffic circle at Abrams Dr and Bonte Dr

CITY OF MARINA

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Marina Heights Drive
California Ave
Marina Heights Drive between California Avenue and Imjin Pakrway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.

The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, horizontal and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.

Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.

The resulting speed limit of 30 mph is still more than is reasonable or safe per City staff. It is therefore recommended that the City adopt a lower speed limit by ordinance to 25 mph, which is the existing posted speed limit.

It should be noted that this segment was not included in the previous ‘Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS)’ study conducted by the City. Therefore, ‘CVC Section 22358.8’ as identified in AB 43, which allows local authorities to retain current speed limit or restore immediately prior speed limit, cannot be used.

The existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
45 EXHIBIT B
123

City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

App
endix D
Radar Speed Survey Data

EXHIBIT B
124
50 EB WB
42 MPH 51
50 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54

TBD MPH
50 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 24 0 < 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 4 4.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 10 10.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 5 5.0% 8 8% 13.0% 23 23.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 6 6.0% 11 11% 17.0% 40 40.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 9 9.0% 16 16% 25.0% 65 65.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 80 80.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 9 9.0% 4 4% 13.0% 93 93.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 100 100.0%
> 53 0 > 53 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

7.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

83.0%
COLLECTOR:

Imjin Parkway
State Route 1 to California Avenue

10.0%MPH42 Below Pace46.5
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 50 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

86.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
1 11:22:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:00:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

54.0%

46.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 24
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
0 > 53
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
125
35 EB WB
32 MPH 41
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 45
SB/WB 55

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 3 3.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 3 3.0% 8 8% 11.0% 14 14.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 9 9% 12.0% 26 26.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 12 12.0% 12 12% 24.0% 50 50.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 18 18.0% 10 10% 28.0% 78 78.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 4 4.0% 10 10% 14.0% 92 92.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 5 5.0% 3 3% 8.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

55.0%

45.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
2 11:27:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:53:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

WB lane closure due to long-term construction. Traffic is still free flowing.

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 39.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

34.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Imjin Parkway
California Avenue to Reservation Road

5.0%MPH33 Below Pace36.5
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

3.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

92.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
126
40 NB SB
36 MPH 45
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 24 0 < 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 2 2.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 6 6.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 22 22.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 5 5.0% 8 8% 13.0% 35 35.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 13 13.0% 10 10% 23.0% 58 58.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 71 71.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 9 9.0% 7 7% 16.0% 87 87.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 93 93.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 98 98.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 53 0 > 53 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

13.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

81.0%
COLLECTOR:

Del Monte Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar Avenue to Reservation Road

6.0%MPH37 Below Pace40.5
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

50.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
3 9:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:46:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 24
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
0 > 53
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
127
40 NB SB
35 MPH 44
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 35
SB/WB 65

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 25 0 < 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 2 2.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 5 5.0% 0 0% 5.0% 7 7.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 10 10.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 28 28.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 6 6.0% 14 14% 20.0% 48 48.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 6 6.0% 16 16% 22.0% 70 70.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 2 2.0% 14 14% 16.0% 86 86.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 1 1.0% 8 8% 9.0% 95 95.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 96 96.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 97 97.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 54 0 > 54 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
4 MPH
Poor

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

5.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

85.0%
COLLECTOR:

Del Monte Boulevard
Reservation Road to Beach Road

10.0%MPH35 Below Pace39
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 42 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

70.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
4 9:35:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:50:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

65.0%

35.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 25
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
0 > 54
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
128
40 NB SB
36 MPH 45
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 39

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 27 0 < 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 2 2.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 12 12.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 19 19.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 30 30.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 12 12.0% 5 5% 17.0% 47 47.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 10 10.0% 5 5% 15.0% 62 62.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 10 10.0% 5 5% 15.0% 77 77.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 88 88.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 94 94.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 96 96.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 97 97.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 98 98.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 56 0 > 56 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Poor

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

15.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

70.0%
COLLECTOR:

Del Monte Boulevard
Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive

15.0%MPH35.85 Below Pace41
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

47.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
5 9:05:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:30:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

39.0%

61.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 27
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
0 > 56
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
129
35 EB WB
25 MPH 34
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 4 4.0% 8 8% 12.0% 13 13.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 5 5.0% 16 16% 21.0% 34 34.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 8 8.0% 11 11% 19.0% 53 53.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 5 5% 14.0% 67 67.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 10 10.0% 4 4% 14.0% 81 81.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 7 7.0% 2 2% 9.0% 90 90.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 94 94.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 97 97.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
5 MPH
Poor

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

14.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

81.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Dunes Drive to Beach Road

5.0%MPH26 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

13.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

90.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
6 2:27:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:50:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
130
30 NB SB
26 MPH 35
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 55
SB/WB 45

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 8 0 < 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 5 5.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 11 11.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 27 27.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 14 14.0% 9 9% 23.0% 50 50.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 12 12.0% 6 6% 18.0% 68 68.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 85 85.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 8 8.0% 4 4% 12.0% 97 97.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 37 0 > 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

3.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

86.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Beach Road to Del Monte Boulevard

11.0%MPH26 Below Pace29.5
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

11.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 33.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

60.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
7 2:52:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

45.0%

55.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 8
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
0 > 37
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
131
35 EB WB
32 MPH 41
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 6 6.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 10 10.0% 12 12% 22.0% 28 28.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 48 48.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 8 8.0% 9 9% 17.0% 65 65.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 11 11.0% 6 6% 17.0% 82 82.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 8 8.0% 1 1% 9.0% 91 91.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

1.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

89.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Del Monte Boulevard to Crescent Avenue

10.0%MPH32 Below Pace35
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 39 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

52.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
8 11:52:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:40:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

46.0%

54.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
132
40 EB WB
35 MPH 44
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 49
SB/WB 51

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 17 0 < 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 6 6.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 7 7.0% 3 3% 10.0% 16 16.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 10 10.0% 15 15% 25.0% 41 41.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 3 3.0% 10 10% 13.0% 54 54.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 13 13.0% 15 15% 28.0% 82 82.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 11 11.0% 3 3% 14.0% 96 96.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 46 0 > 46 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

4.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

90.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Crescent Avenue to California Avenue

6.0%MPH36 Below Pace39
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 43 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

54.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
9 11:15:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:48:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

51.0%

49.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 17
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
0 > 46
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
133
45 EB WB
41 MPH 50
45 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
45 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 31 0 < 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 3 3.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 19 19.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 36 36.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 51 51.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 62 62.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 11 11.0% 10 10% 21.0% 83 83.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 4 4.0% 2 2% 6.0% 89 89.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 95 95.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 98 98.0%
57 - 58 57 - 58 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
59 - 60 59 - 60 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 60 0 > 60 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

17.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

80.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
California Avenue to Salinas Avenue

3.0%MPH42 Below Pace46
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 51 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

45.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
10 1:28:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:57:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 31
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
57 - 58
59 - 60
0 > 60
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
134
55 EB WB
46 MPH 55
55 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
55 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 37 0 < 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 3 3.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 8 8.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 18 18.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 33 33.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 11 11.0% 10 10% 21.0% 54 54.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 62 62.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 73 73.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 84 84.0%
57 - 58 57 - 58 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 90 90.0%
59 - 60 59 - 60 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 95 95.0%
61 - 62 61 - 62 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 98 98.0%
63 - 64 63 - 64 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
65 - 66 65 - 66 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 66 0 > 66 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

18.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

69.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Salinas Avenue to Imjin Parkway

13.0%MPH46 Below Pace50
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 57 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

82.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
11 1:02:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:26:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 37
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
57 - 58
59 - 60
61 - 62
63 - 64
65 - 66
0 > 66
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
135
55 EB WB
50 MPH 59
55 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
55 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 36 0 < 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 1 1.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 3 3.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 6 6.0% 3 3% 9.0% 12 12.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 5 5.0% 11 11% 16.0% 28 28.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 41 41.0%
54 - 55 54 - 55 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 58 58.0%
56 - 57 56 - 57 6 6.0% 2 2% 8.0% 66 66.0%
58 - 59 58 - 59 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 80 80.0%
60 - 61 60 - 61 5 5.0% 6 6% 11.0% 91 91.0%
62 - 63 62 - 63 2 2.0% 5 5% 7.0% 98 98.0%
64 - 65 64 - 65 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 65 0 > 65 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
5 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

20.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

68.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reservation Road
Imjin Parkway to Blanco Road

12.0%MPH50 Below Pace55
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 60.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

58.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
12 12:39:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:58:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 36
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
54 - 55
56 - 57
58 - 59
60 - 61
62 - 63
64 - 65
0 > 65
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
136
25 EB WB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 57
NB/EB 23
SB/WB 34

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 4 0 < 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 1 1.8% 2 4% 5.3% 3 5.3%
24 - 25 24 - 25 1 1.8% 4 7% 8.8% 8 14.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 4 7.0% 12 21% 28.1% 24 42.1%
28 - 29 28 - 29 5 8.8% 4 7% 15.8% 33 57.9%
30 - 31 30 - 31 7 12.3% 6 11% 22.8% 46 80.7%
32 - 33 32 - 33 5 8.8% 6 11% 19.3% 57 100.0%
> 33 0 > 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 57 100.0%

59.6%

40.4%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
13 9:18:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:18:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

14.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32.6 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

14.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:
8th Street
2nd Avenue to 3rd Avenue

5.3%MPH26 Below Pace28
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
New

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

0.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

94.7%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 4
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
0 > 33
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
137
40 EB WB
30 MPH 39
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 48
SB/WB 52

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 18 0 < 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 2 2% 11.0% 12 12.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 32 32.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 6 6% 9.0% 41 41.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 16 16.0% 16 16% 32.0% 73 73.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 3 3.0% 6 6% 9.0% 82 82.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 8 8% 10.0% 92 92.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 93 93.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 97 97.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 47 0 > 47 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

52.0%

48.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
14 2:50:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:52:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 41 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:
8th Street
5th Avenue to Inter-Garrison Road

1.0%MPH32 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

18.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

81.0%
COLLECTOR:

In Pace36

MPH MPH

84.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 18
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
0 > 47
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
138
30 EB WB
22 MPH 31
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 39

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 2 2.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 16 16.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 16 16.0% 9 9% 25.0% 41 41.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 17 17.0% 7 7% 24.0% 65 65.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 84 84.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 8 8.0% 5 5% 13.0% 97 97.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

39.0%

61.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
15 12:04:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:41:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

31.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:
9th Street
1st Avenue to 2nd Avenue

1.0%MPH24 Below Pace
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

4.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

95.0%
COLLECTOR:

In Pace27

MPH MPH

84.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
139
45 NB SB
38 MPH 47
45 #Entries 100
NB/EB 56
SB/WB 44

TBD MPH
45 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 21 0 < 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 7 7.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 13 13.0% 4 4% 17.0% 24 24.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 20 20.0% 15 15% 35.0% 59 59.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 73 73.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 9 9.0% 11 11% 20.0% 93 93.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 96 96.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 4 4.0% 0 0% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 50 0 > 50 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

44.0%

56.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
16 9:00:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:42:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 46 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:
2nd Avenue
Divarty Street to 8th Street

1.0%MPH40 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

5.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

94.0%
COLLECTOR:

In Pace42

MPH MPH

82.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 21
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
0 > 50
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
140
35 NB SB
29 MPH 38
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 3 3.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 16 16.0% 10 10% 26.0% 29 29.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 15 15.0% 18 18% 33.0% 62 62.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 8 8.0% 13 13% 21.0% 83 83.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 92 92.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 98 98.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

54.0%

46.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
17 9:45:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:26:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:
2nd Avenue
8th Street to Imjin Parkway

1.0%MPH31 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

4.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

95.0%
COLLECTOR:

In Pace33

MPH MPH

83.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
141
35 EB WB
25 MPH 34
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 40
SB/WB 60

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 3 3.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 15 15.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 31 31.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 6 6.0% 10 10% 16.0% 47 47.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 59 59.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 74 74.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 10 10% 13.0% 87 87.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 93 93.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 5 5% 5.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

20.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

74.0%
COLLECTOR:

Beach Road
Reservation Road to Del Monte Boulevard

6.0%MPH25.85 Below Pace30.5
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

15.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 35 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

87.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
18 9:55:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:20:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

60.0%

40.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
142
30 NB SB
29 MPH 38
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 36
SB/WB 64

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 3 3.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 10 10.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 23 23.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 7 7.0% 13 13% 20.0% 43 43.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 10 10.0% 25 25% 35.0% 78 78.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 87 87.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 1 1.0% 8 8% 9.0% 96 96.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 98 98.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

4.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

86.0%
COLLECTOR:

De Forest Road
Beach Road to Reservation Road

10.0%MPH29.85 Below Pace33
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

2.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

23.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
19 9:17:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:24:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

64.0%

36.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
143
25 NB SB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 8 0 < 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 10 10.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 15 15.0% 14 14% 29.0% 39 39.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 8 8.0% 8 8% 16.0% 55 55.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 75 75.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 6 6.0% 16 16% 22.0% 97 97.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 98 98.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 37 0 > 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

3.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

97.0%
COLLECTOR:

Crescent Avenue
Quebrada Del Mar to Reservation Road

0.0%MPH26 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

10.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

10.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
20 10:28:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:06:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

54.0%

46.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 8
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
0 > 37
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
144
30 NB SB
27 MPH 36
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 16 0 < 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 8 8.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 19 19.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 10 10.0% 7 7% 17.0% 36 36.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 8 8.0% 12 12% 20.0% 56 56.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 66 66.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 4 4.0% 8 8% 12.0% 78 78.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 5 5.0% 9 9% 14.0% 92 92.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 93 93.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 97 97.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 45 0 > 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

54.0%

46.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
21 10:22:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:44:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

8.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

44.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Crescent Avenue
Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue

12.0%MPH27 Below Pace31
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

13.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

75.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 16
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
0 > 45
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
145
30 NB SB
22 MPH 31
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 12 0 < 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 3 3.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 4 4.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 8 8.0% 5 5% 13.0% 17 17.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 6 6.0% 4 4% 10.0% 27 27.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 39 39.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 5 5% 14.0% 53 53.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 71 71.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 79 79.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 6 6.0% 2 2% 8.0% 87 87.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 91 91.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 7 7% 7.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 41 0 > 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
New

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

29.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

67.0%
COLLECTOR:

Cardoza Avenue
Reservation Road to Aaron Way (End)

4.0%MPH23 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

27.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 35 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

64.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
22 11:30:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

46.0%

54.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 12
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
0 > 41
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
146
25 EB WB
18 MPH 27
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 51
SB/WB 49

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 3 3.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 2 2.0% 5 5% 7.0% 10 10.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 22 22.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 12 12.0% 5 5% 17.0% 39 39.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 13 13.0% 7 7% 20.0% 59 59.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 77 77.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 86 86.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 94 94.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 99 99.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

18.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

77.0%
COLLECTOR:

Beach Road
Del Monte Boulevard to De Forest Road

5.0%MPH19 Below Pace24
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

69.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 28 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

69.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
23 10:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:13:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

49.0%

51.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
147
35 NB SB
28 MPH 37
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 2 2.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 5 5.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 23 23.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 12 12% 21.0% 44 44.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 11 11.0% 7 7% 18.0% 62 62.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 76 76.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 9 9.0% 4 4% 13.0% 89 89.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 91 91.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 96 96.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

11.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

84.0%
COLLECTOR:

California Avenue
Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue

5.0%MPH29 Below Pace32
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

2.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 37 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

76.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
24 10:19:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:43:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
148
25 NB SB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 16 0 < 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 1 1.0% 3 3% 4.0% 4 4.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 21 21.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 36 36.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 54 54.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 12 12.0% 13 13% 25.0% 79 79.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 88 88.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 93 93.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 3 3% 4.0% 97 97.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 99 99.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 45 0 > 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

13.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

84.0%
COLLECTOR:

California Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reindollar Avenue

3.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

21.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

21.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
25 9:50:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:16:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 16
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
0 > 45
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
149
40 NB SB
37 MPH 46
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 47
SB/WB 53

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 25 0 < 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 2 2.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 5 5.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 13 13.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 32 32.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 12 12.0% 10 10% 22.0% 54 54.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 9 9.0% 6 6% 15.0% 69 69.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 5 5.0% 7 7% 12.0% 81 81.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 4 4.0% 7 7% 11.0% 92 92.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 94 94.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 97 97.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 54 0 > 54 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

8.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

79.0%
COLLECTOR:

California Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Imjin Parkway

13.0%MPH37 Below Pace40
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

54.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
26 9:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:46:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

53.0%

47.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 25
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
0 > 54
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
150
30 NB SB
20 MPH 29
30 #Entries 58
NB/EB 40
SB/WB 18

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 4 0 < 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 2 3.4% 5 9% 12.1% 7 12.1%
22 - 23 22 - 23 12 20.7% 2 3% 24.1% 21 36.2%
24 - 25 24 - 25 6 10.3% 1 2% 12.1% 28 48.3%
26 - 27 26 - 27 13 22.4% 7 12% 34.5% 48 82.8%
28 - 29 28 - 29 2 3.4% 1 2% 5.2% 51 87.9%
30 - 31 30 - 31 4 6.9% 2 3% 10.3% 57 98.3%
32 - 33 32 - 33 1 1.7% 0 0% 1.7% 58 100.0%
> 33 0 > 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

31.0%

69.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
27 12:48:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:48:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

48.3%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 28 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

California Avenue
Imjin Parkway to 8th Street

0.0%MPH22 Below Pace
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

12.1%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

87.9%
COLLECTOR:

In Pace26

MPH MPH

91.4%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 4
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
0 > 33
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
151
25 EB WB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 48
SB/WB 52

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 12 0 < 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 3 3.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 18 18.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 10 10.0% 12 12% 22.0% 40 40.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 9 9% 18.0% 58 58.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 73 73.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 84 84.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 5 5% 8.0% 92 92.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 96 96.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 97 97.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 41 0 > 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

52.0%

48.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
28 11:24:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:47:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

18.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

18.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Reindollar Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue

3.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

16.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

81.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 12
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
0 > 41
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
152
30 EB WB
25 MPH 34
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 7 7.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 11 11.0% 6 6% 17.0% 24 24.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 13 13.0% 11 11% 24.0% 48 48.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 11 11.0% 12 12% 23.0% 71 71.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 81 81.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 97 97.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

3.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

90.0%
COLLECTOR:

Reindollar Avenue
California Avenue to Carmel Avenue

7.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

16.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 33 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

71.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
29 12:44:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:26:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
153
25 EB WB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 5 5.0% 12 12% 17.0% 17 17.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 35 35.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 20 20.0% 15 15% 35.0% 70 70.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 82 82.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 6 6.0% 10 10% 16.0% 98 98.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

54.0%

46.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
30 3:27:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:10:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

23.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

23.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Carmel Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue

0.0%MPH24 Below Pace27
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

2.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

98.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
154
25 EB WB
22 MPH 31
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 4 4.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 12 12.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 23 23.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 9 9.0% 10 10% 19.0% 42 42.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 12 12.0% 14 14% 26.0% 68 68.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 6 6.0% 9 9% 15.0% 83 83.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 93 93.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 98 98.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 99 99.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

2.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

85.0%
COLLECTOR:

Carmel Avenue
California Avenue to Salinas Avenue

13.0%MPH22 Below Pace25
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

56.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 29 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

56.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
31 10:49:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:39:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
155
25 NB SB
16 MPH 25
25 #Entries 91
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 30

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 0 0 < 0 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
0 - 1 0 - 1 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
2 - 3 2 - 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 2 2.2% 2 2% 4.4% 4 4.4%
16 - 17 16 - 17 8 8.8% 6 7% 15.4% 18 19.8%
18 - 19 18 - 19 21 23.1% 10 11% 34.1% 49 53.8%
20 - 21 20 - 21 11 12.1% 6 7% 18.7% 66 72.5%
22 - 23 22 - 23 7 7.7% 1 1% 8.8% 74 81.3%
24 - 25 24 - 25 11 12.1% 4 4% 16.5% 89 97.8%
26 - 27 26 - 27 1 1.1% 0 0% 1.1% 90 98.9%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.1% 91 100.0%
> 29 0 > 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 91 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Poor

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

2.2%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

93.4%
COLLECTOR:

Salinas Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road

4.4%MPH17 Below Pace19
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

97.8%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 24 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

97.8%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
32 2:05:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

33.0%

67.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 0
0 - 1
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
0 > 29
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
156
30 NB SB
17 MPH 26
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 41
SB/WB 59

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 2 0 < 2 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
2 - 3 2 - 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 2 3% 2.5% 2 2.5%
16 - 17 16 - 17 1 1.3% 4 5% 6.3% 7 8.8%
18 - 19 18 - 19 6 7.5% 6 8% 15.0% 19 23.8%
20 - 21 20 - 21 9 11.3% 10 13% 23.8% 38 47.5%
22 - 23 22 - 23 8 10.0% 8 10% 20.0% 54 67.5%
24 - 25 24 - 25 8 10.0% 4 5% 15.0% 66 82.5%
26 - 27 26 - 27 3 3.8% 2 3% 6.3% 71 88.8%
28 - 29 28 - 29 4 5.0% 2 3% 7.5% 77 96.3%
30 - 31 30 - 31 2 2.5% 1 1% 3.8% 80 100.0%
> 31 0 > 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 80 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

11.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

85.0%
COLLECTOR:

Paul Davis Drive
Healy Avenue to Marina Greens Drive

4.0%MPH18 Below Pace21
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

86.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 25 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

99.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
33 12:10:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:10:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

59.0%

41.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 2
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
0 > 31
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
157
40 EB WB
34 MPH 43
40 #Entries 59
NB/EB 25
SB/WB 34

TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 20 0 < 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.7% 0 0% 1.7% 1 1.7%
30 - 31 30 - 31 1 1.7% 2 3% 5.1% 4 6.8%
32 - 33 32 - 33 2 3.4% 3 5% 8.5% 9 15.3%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 5.1% 4 7% 11.9% 16 27.1%
36 - 37 36 - 37 10 16.9% 7 12% 28.8% 33 55.9%
38 - 39 38 - 39 3 5.1% 6 10% 15.3% 42 71.2%
40 - 41 40 - 41 3 5.1% 6 10% 15.3% 51 86.4%
42 - 43 42 - 43 2 3.4% 5 8% 11.9% 58 98.3%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 98.3%
46 - 47 46 - 47 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 98.3%
48 - 49 48 - 49 0 0.0% 1 2% 1.7% 59 100.0%
> 49 0 > 49 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 59 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
New

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

1.7%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

83.1%
COLLECTOR:

Patton Parkway
Marina High School to California Avenue

15.3%MPH33.7 Below Pace37
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

0.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 41 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

78.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
34 1:25:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:25:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

57.6%

42.4%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 20
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
0 > 49
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
158
25 NB SB
22 MPH 31
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 9 0 < 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 5 5.0% 7 7% 12.0% 13 13.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 9 9.0% 9 9% 18.0% 31 31.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 12 12.0% 11 11% 23.0% 54 54.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 13 13.0% 9 9% 22.0% 76 76.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 86 86.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 2 2% 6.0% 92 92.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 97 97.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 99 99.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 38 0 > 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

8.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

88.0%
COLLECTOR:

Crescent Street
Patton Parkway to Reindollar Avenue

4.0%MPH23 Below Pace26
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

40.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 30 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

40.0%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
35 3:06:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:09:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

50.0%

50.0%

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 9
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
0 > 38
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
159
25 NB SB
21 MPH 30
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 53
SB/WB 47

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 3 0 < 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
3 - 4 3 - 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 11 11.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 8 8.0% 8 8% 16.0% 27 27.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 14 14.0% 10 10% 24.0% 51 51.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 14 14.0% 13 13% 27.0% 78 78.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 10 10% 17.0% 95 95.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 100 100.0%
> 32 0 > 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

47.0%

53.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
36 10:47:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:19:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

38.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 29 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

38.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Vaughn Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue

1.0%MPH23 Below Pace26
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

5.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

94.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 3
3 - 4
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
0 > 32
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
160
30 NB SB
23 MPH 32
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 10 0 < 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 5 5.0% 1 1% 6.0% 7 7.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 13 13.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 12 12.0% 9 9% 21.0% 34 34.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 48 48.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 12 12% 21.0% 69 69.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 85 85.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 94 94.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 98 98.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 39 0 > 39 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
37 9:50:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:19:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

34.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

76.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Seacrest Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road

11.0%MPH24 Below Pace28
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

8.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

81.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 10
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
0 > 39
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
161
25 NB SB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 101
NB/EB 51
SB/WB 50

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 3 3.0% 6 6% 8.9% 10 9.9%
25 - 26 25 - 26 9 8.9% 8 8% 16.8% 27 26.7%
27 - 28 27 - 28 16 15.8% 19 19% 34.7% 62 61.4%
29 - 30 29 - 30 12 11.9% 8 8% 19.8% 82 81.2%
31 - 32 31 - 32 7 6.9% 7 7% 13.9% 96 95.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 99.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 101 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 101 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

5.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

94.1%
COLLECTOR:

Sunset Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue

1.0%MPH25 Below Pace28
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

16.8%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

16.8%
NONE

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
38 12:45:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:18:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

49.5%

50.5%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
162
30 NB SB
27 MPH 36
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46

TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 17 0 < 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 2 2.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 8 8.0% 2 2% 10.0% 12 12.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 31 31.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 11 11.0% 8 8% 19.0% 50 50.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 12 12.0% 14 14% 26.0% 76 76.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 88 88.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 96 96.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 99 99.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 46 0 > 46 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%

46.0%

54.0%

IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY

CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
39 11:56:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:31:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:

Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:

None

FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:

SPEED ZONE LIMITS:

UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:

DIRECTION OF COLLECTION

2.0%

EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:

COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace

MPH MPH

31.0%
# OF LANES:

TO
SURVEY LIMITS:

SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:

SURVEY END TIME:

STREET CLASSIFICATION:

WEATHER:

Lake Drive
Palm Avenue to Reservation Road

2.0%MPH29 Below Pace32.5
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair

PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH

12.0%

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT

86.0%
COLLECTOR:

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 17
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
0 > 46
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %

EXHIBIT B
163
25 EB WB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 47
SB/WB 53

TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 3 0 < 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
3 - 4 3 - 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 16 16.0% 14 14% 30.0% 30 30.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 16 16.0% 10 10% 26.0% 56 56.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 11 11.0% 19 19% 30.0% 86 86.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 93 93.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 1 1.0% 6 6% 7.0% 100 100.0%
> 32 0 > 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%