Cities Index.
Agenda packet, second session

Menifee City Council
July 15, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, second session
Meeting
July 15, 2026
Body
Menifee City Council
Pages
116
Original file
153.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofmenifee.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Watson Avenue - Driveway 1
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN001
Site Code: 999-25132
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Northbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
01:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
02:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
03:00 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
04:00 0 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
05:00 0 14 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
06:00 0 19 11 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 36
07:00 0 17 7 0 2 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 35
08:00 0 8 15 0 3 16 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 47
09:00 0 7 7 0 3 22 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 41
10:00 0 16 14 0 2 13 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 53
11:00 0 10 9 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 35
12 PM 0 14 16 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 46
13:00 0 33 17 0 3 15 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 72
14:00 0 18 19 0 5 16 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 61
15:00 0 19 16 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 52
16:00 0 10 10 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
17:00 0 11 4 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 23
18:00 0 5 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14
19:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
21:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
22:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 0 224 172 1 26 150 2 1 16 0 20 0 0 612
Percent 0.0% 36.6% 28.1% 0.2% 4.2% 24.5% 0.3% 0.2% 2.6% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 06:00 08:00 08:00 09:00 09:00 10:00 10:00 10:00 Vol. 19 15 3 22 1 5 3 53
PM Peak 13:00 14:00 22:00 14:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 Vol. 33 19 1 5 16 1 3 2 72
Grand
Total 0 224 172 1 26 150 2 1 16 0 20 0 0 612
Percent 0.0% 36.6% 28.1% 0.2% 4.2% 24.5% 0.3% 0.2% 2.6% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 81
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 721
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1351 of 3153

Page 2 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Watson Avenue - Driveway 1
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN001
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
01:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
02:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
03:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
04:00 0 5 3 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 14
05:00 0 4 2 0 2 5 7 0 3 0 1 0 0 24
06:00 0 3 10 0 0 3 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 35
07:00 1 12 17 0 2 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 53
08:00 0 12 19 0 6 1 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 50
09:00 0 8 14 0 6 6 16 0 3 0 4 0 0 57
10:00 0 8 16 0 6 2 11 1 4 0 0 0 0 48
11:00 0 12 15 0 1 5 13 0 5 0 1 0 0 52
12 PM 0 22 11 0 3 4 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 51
13:00 0 18 25 0 2 1 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 59
14:00 0 17 29 0 4 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 60
15:00 0 43 26 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 80
16:00 0 26 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49
17:00 0 21 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 36
18:00 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 11
19:00 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10
20:00 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6
21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Total 1 233 231 0 36 34 129 3 21 1 22 0 0 711
Percent 0.1% 32.8% 32.5% 0.0% 5.1% 4.8% 18.1% 0.4% 3.0% 0.1% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 09:00 07:00 10:00 11:00 09:00 09:00 Vol. 1 12 19 6 6 20 1 5 4 57
PM Peak 15:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 15:00 Vol. 43 29 4 4 11 1 2 1 3 80

Grand
Total 1 233 231 0 36 34 129 3 21 1 22 0 0 711
Percent 0.1% 32.8% 32.5% 0.0% 5.1% 4.8% 18.1% 0.4% 3.0% 0.1% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 82
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 722
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1352 of 3153

Page 3 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Watson Avenue - Driveway 1
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN001
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound, Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
01:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8
02:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:00 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8
04:00 0 17 11 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 34
05:00 0 18 11 0 2 7 7 0 3 0 1 0 0 49
06:00 0 22 21 0 1 7 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 71
07:00 1 29 24 0 4 9 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 88
08:00 0 20 34 0 9 17 10 0 4 0 3 0 0 97
09:00 0 15 21 0 9 28 16 1 4 0 4 0 0 98
10:00 0 24 30 0 8 15 11 1 9 0 3 0 0 101
11:00 0 22 24 0 3 17 13 0 5 0 3 0 0 87
12 PM 0 36 27 0 5 16 9 1 1 0 2 0 0 97
13:00 0 51 42 0 5 16 11 0 5 0 1 0 0 131
14:00 0 35 48 0 9 18 6 1 2 1 1 0 0 121
15:00 0 62 42 0 4 15 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 132
16:00 0 36 33 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 79
17:00 0 32 16 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 59
18:00 0 13 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 25
19:00 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 13
20:00 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7
21:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
22:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6
23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Total 1 457 403 1 62 184 131 4 37 1 42 0 0 1323
Percent 0.1% 34.5% 30.5% 0.1% 4.7% 13.9% 9.9% 0.3% 2.8% 0.1% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 09:00 07:00 09:00 10:00 09:00 10:00 Vol. 1 29 34 9 28 20 1 9 4 101
PM Peak 15:00 14:00 22:00 14:00 14:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 15:00 Vol. 62 48 1 9 18 11 1 5 1 5 132

Grand
Total 1 457 403 1 62 184 131 4 37 1 42 0 0 1323
Percent 0.1% 34.5% 30.5% 0.1% 4.7% 13.9% 9.9% 0.3% 2.8% 0.1% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 83
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 723
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1353 of 3153

Page 1 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 1 - Driveway 2
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN002
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
02:00 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
03:00 0 1 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
04:00 0 6 5 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
05:00 1 15 5 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 32
06:00 0 17 7 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
07:00 0 9 10 0 1 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 30
08:00 0 10 7 0 2 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 32
09:00 0 10 15 0 0 11 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 39
10:00 0 14 9 0 3 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 38
11:00 0 17 4 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 34
12 PM 1 12 17 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
13:00 0 12 11 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 33
14:00 0 10 11 0 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 28
15:00 0 13 8 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
16:00 1 14 11 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
17:00 1 5 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14
18:00 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11
19:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
20:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
22:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
23:00 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Total 5 194 133 0 19 146 1 0 8 2 8 0 0 516
Percent 1.0% 37.6% 25.8% 0.0% 3.7% 28.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.6% 0.4% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 05:00 06:00 09:00 10:00 04:00 05:00 08:00 00:00 06:00 Vol. 1 17 15 3 15 1 1 1 40
PM Peak 12:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 13:00 17:00 12:00 Vol. 1 14 17 3 11 1 2 1 44

Grand
Total 5 194 133 0 19 146 1 0 8 2 8 0 0 516
Percent 1.0% 37.6% 25.8% 0.0% 3.7% 28.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.6% 0.4% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 84
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 724
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1354 of 3153

Page 2 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 1 - Driveway 2
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN002
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
02:00 0 1 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 18
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
04:00 0 0 3 0 3 1 17 0 1 0 1 0 0 26
05:00 0 1 1 0 2 2 14 0 1 0 1 0 0 22
06:00 0 6 6 0 4 3 12 0 1 1 3 0 0 36
07:00 0 11 22 0 4 0 12 0 2 0 1 0 0 52
08:00 0 15 24 0 0 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 52
09:00 0 15 16 0 3 3 12 0 3 0 2 0 0 54
10:00 0 13 18 0 2 2 8 0 4 0 1 0 0 48
11:00 0 31 13 0 1 6 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 59
12 PM 1 21 18 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
13:00 1 12 15 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
14:00 0 11 16 0 2 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 39
15:00 0 38 18 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
16:00 0 24 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
17:00 2 27 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 40
18:00 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7
19:00 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
20:00 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
22:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 4 242 204 0 33 28 141 1 18 1 19 0 0 691
Percent 0.6% 35.0% 29.5% 0.0% 4.8% 4.1% 20.4% 0.1% 2.6% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 08:00 06:00 02:00 03:00 10:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 Vol. 31 24 4 6 17 4 1 3 59
PM Peak 17:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 Vol. 2 38 19 5 3 5 1 2 2 60

Grand
Total 4 242 204 0 33 28 141 1 18 1 19 0 0 691
Percent 0.6% 35.0% 29.5% 0.0% 4.8% 4.1% 20.4% 0.1% 2.6% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 85
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 725
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1355 of 3153

Page 3 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 1 - Driveway 2
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN002
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound, Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 6 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 16
01:00 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
02:00 0 4 0 0 0 12 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 27
03:00 0 1 1 0 0 13 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
04:00 0 6 8 0 4 16 17 0 1 0 1 0 0 53
05:00 1 16 6 0 3 11 14 0 2 0 1 0 0 54
06:00 0 23 13 0 5 18 12 0 1 1 3 0 0 76
07:00 0 20 32 0 5 8 12 0 3 0 2 0 0 82
08:00 0 25 31 0 2 12 10 0 3 1 0 0 0 84
09:00 0 25 31 0 3 14 12 0 4 1 3 0 0 93
10:00 0 27 27 0 5 13 8 0 5 0 1 0 0 86
11:00 0 48 17 0 2 16 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 93
12 PM 2 33 35 0 8 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 94
13:00 1 24 26 0 2 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 64
14:00 0 21 27 0 3 7 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 67
15:00 0 51 26 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88
16:00 1 38 30 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74
17:00 3 32 15 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 54
18:00 1 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 18
19:00 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14
20:00 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6
22:00 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5
23:00 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Total 9 436 337 0 52 174 142 1 26 3 27 0 0 1207
Percent 0.7% 36.1% 27.9% 0.0% 4.3% 14.4% 11.8% 0.1% 2.2% 0.2% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 05:00 11:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 03:00 10:00 06:00 06:00 09:00 Vol. 1 48 32 5 18 17 5 1 3 93
PM Peak 17:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 Vol. 3 51 35 8 11 5 1 3 2 94

Grand
Total 9 436 337 0 52 174 142 1 26 3 27 0 0 1207
Percent 0.7% 36.1% 27.9% 0.0% 4.3% 14.4% 11.8% 0.1% 2.2% 0.2% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 86
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 726
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1356 of 3153

Page 1 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 2 - Illinois Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN003
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
02:00 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
03:00 0 1 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
04:00 0 6 5 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
05:00 1 17 6 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 35
06:00 1 26 6 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
07:00 0 14 10 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34
08:00 0 13 8 0 2 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 36
09:00 0 9 15 0 0 11 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 38
10:00 0 14 9 0 5 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 40
11:00 1 16 4 0 1 11 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 36
12 PM 1 16 17 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
13:00 0 15 11 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 36
14:00 0 11 12 0 2 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 32
15:00 0 9 8 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
16:00 1 14 10 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
17:00 1 6 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 15
18:00 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11
19:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
20:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
22:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
23:00 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Total 7 214 134 0 21 148 1 0 8 2 8 0 0 543
Percent 1.3% 39.4% 24.7% 0.0% 3.9% 27.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.5% 0.4% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 05:00 06:00 09:00 10:00 04:00 11:00 08:00 00:00 06:00 Vol. 1 26 15 5 15 2 1 1 48
PM Peak 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 13:00 17:00 12:00 Vol. 1 16 17 3 11 1 2 1 48

Grand
Total 7 214 134 0 21 148 1 0 8 2 8 0 0 543
Percent 1.3% 39.4% 24.7% 0.0% 3.9% 27.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.5% 0.4% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 87
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 727
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1357 of 3153

Page 2 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 2 - Illinois Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN003
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
02:00 0 3 0 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 20
03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
04:00 0 0 3 0 3 1 17 0 1 0 1 0 0 26
05:00 0 1 0 0 2 2 14 0 1 0 1 0 0 21
06:00 0 2 5 0 5 5 12 0 0 1 3 0 0 33
07:00 0 10 21 0 4 0 12 0 2 0 1 0 0 50
08:00 0 14 23 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 49
09:00 0 13 17 0 2 3 12 0 4 0 2 0 0 53
10:00 0 13 18 0 2 2 8 0 4 0 1 0 0 48
11:00 0 33 12 0 1 6 6 0 1 1 1 0 0 61
12 PM 1 22 18 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 51
13:00 1 13 15 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
14:00 0 13 17 0 2 3 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 42
15:00 0 45 18 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68
16:00 0 24 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45
17:00 2 37 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51
18:00 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7
19:00 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
20:00 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
22:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 4 262 204 0 34 30 141 1 17 2 19 0 0 714
Percent 0.6% 36.7% 28.6% 0.0% 4.8% 4.2% 19.7% 0.1% 2.4% 0.3% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 11:00 08:00 06:00 02:00 03:00 09:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 Vol. 33 23 5 6 17 4 1 3 61
PM Peak 17:00 15:00 16:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 Vol. 2 45 20 5 3 5 1 2 2 68

Grand
Total 4 262 204 0 34 30 141 1 17 2 19 0 0 714
Percent 0.6% 36.7% 28.6% 0.0% 4.8% 4.2% 19.7% 0.1% 2.4% 0.3% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 88
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 728
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1358 of 3153

Page 3 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Driveway 2 - Illinois Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN003
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound, Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 7 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 17
01:00 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
02:00 0 6 0 0 0 12 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 29
03:00 0 2 1 0 0 13 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
04:00 0 6 8 0 4 16 17 0 1 0 1 0 0 53
05:00 1 18 6 0 3 11 14 0 2 0 1 0 0 56
06:00 1 28 11 0 5 20 12 0 0 1 3 0 0 81
07:00 0 24 31 0 5 8 12 0 2 0 2 0 0 84
08:00 0 27 31 0 2 12 10 0 2 1 0 0 0 85
09:00 0 22 32 0 2 14 12 0 5 1 3 0 0 91
10:00 0 27 27 0 7 13 8 0 5 0 1 0 0 88
11:00 1 49 16 0 2 17 6 0 3 1 2 0 0 97
12 PM 2 38 35 0 8 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 99
13:00 1 28 26 0 2 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 68
14:00 0 24 29 0 4 8 4 0 3 0 2 0 0 74
15:00 0 54 26 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92
16:00 1 38 30 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74
17:00 3 43 16 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 66
18:00 1 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 18
19:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 14
20:00 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6
21:00 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6
22:00 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5
23:00 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Total 11 476 338 0 55 178 142 1 25 4 27 0 0 1257
Percent 0.9% 37.9% 26.9% 0.0% 4.4% 14.2% 11.3% 0.1% 2.0% 0.3% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 05:00 11:00 09:00 10:00 06:00 03:00 09:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 Vol. 1 49 32 7 20 17 5 1 3 97
PM Peak 17:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 14:00 12:00 Vol. 3 54 35 8 11 5 1 3 2 99

Grand
Total 11 476 338 0 55 178 142 1 25 4 27 0 0 1257
Percent 0.9% 37.9% 26.9% 0.0% 4.4% 14.2% 11.3% 0.1% 2.0% 0.3% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 89
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 729
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1359 of 3153

Page 1 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Illinois Avenue - Ethanac Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN004
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
01:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
02:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
03:00 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
04:00 0 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
05:00 0 32 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
06:00 1 46 20 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
07:00 0 50 24 1 3 8 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 89
08:00 0 36 34 0 3 16 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 93
09:00 0 33 33 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 92
10:00 2 29 22 0 2 13 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 75
11:00 0 22 39 0 5 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 80
12 PM 1 45 26 1 3 12 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 91
13:00 1 55 39 0 1 15 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 115
14:00 0 37 45 1 1 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 103
15:00 0 34 23 0 5 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 76
16:00 1 21 22 1 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
17:00 0 33 15 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 57
18:00 0 10 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16
19:00 2 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14
20:00 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14
21:00 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
22:00 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6
23:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Total 8 568 352 4 29 152 3 1 18 0 19 0 0 1154
Percent 0.7% 49.2% 30.5% 0.3% 2.5% 13.2% 0.3% 0.1% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 09:00 07:00 10:00 10:00 08:00 Vol. 2 50 39 1 5 23 1 4 3 93
PM Peak 19:00 13:00 14:00 12:00 15:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 Vol. 2 55 45 1 5 17 2 3 2 115

Grand
Total 8 568 352 4 29 152 3 1 18 0 19 0 0 1154
Percent 0.7% 49.2% 30.5% 0.3% 2.5% 13.2% 0.3% 0.1% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 90
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 730
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1360 of 3153

Page 2 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Illinois Avenue - Ethanac Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN004
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
01:00 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 11
02:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
03:00 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8
04:00 0 5 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12
05:00 0 7 2 0 2 11 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 25
06:00 0 10 14 0 2 8 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 49
07:00 0 18 32 0 0 0 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 72
08:00 0 25 38 0 3 2 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 79
09:00 0 16 30 0 5 5 18 0 2 0 4 0 0 80
10:00 1 12 24 0 2 5 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 57
11:00 1 26 38 0 4 4 12 0 8 0 2 0 0 95
12 PM 1 54 30 1 4 3 10 3 1 0 1 0 0 108
13:00 0 39 40 0 2 1 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 95
14:00 1 38 47 1 1 2 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 98
15:00 2 68 43 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 124
16:00 3 62 47 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115
17:00 0 69 29 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 102
18:00 0 49 7 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 59
19:00 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 18
20:00 2 12 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17
21:00 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
22:00 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
23:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5
Total 11 575 430 3 30 49 115 7 31 0 14 0 0 1265
Percent 0.9% 45.5% 34.0% 0.2% 2.4% 3.9% 9.1% 0.6% 2.5% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 11:00 08:00 09:00 05:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 09:00 11:00 Vol. 1 26 38 5 11 20 2 8 4 95
PM Peak 16:00 17:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 17:00 15:00 Vol. 3 69 47 1 4 3 11 3 2 3 124

Grand
Total 11 575 430 3 30 49 115 7 31 0 14 0 0 1265
Percent 0.9% 45.5% 34.0% 0.2% 2.4% 3.9% 9.1% 0.6% 2.5% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 91
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 731
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1361 of 3153

Page 3 ends

City of Menifee
Trumble Road
B/ Illinois Avenue - Ethanac Avenue
24 Hour Directional Classification Count

MEN004
Site Code: 999-25132

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Northbound, Southbound
Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/11/25 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12
01:00 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 12
02:00 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
03:00 0 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 23
04:00 0 29 5 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 38
05:00 0 39 5 0 2 13 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 62
06:00 1 56 34 0 4 12 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 122
07:00 0 68 56 1 3 8 20 3 2 0 0 0 0 161
08:00 0 61 72 0 6 18 9 1 3 0 2 0 0 172
09:00 0 49 63 0 5 28 18 0 5 0 4 0 0 172
10:00 3 41 46 0 4 18 9 0 8 0 3 0 0 132
11:00 1 48 77 0 9 16 12 0 8 0 4 0 0 175
12 PM 2 99 56 2 7 15 10 3 2 0 3 0 0 199
13:00 1 94 79 0 3 16 11 0 5 0 1 0 0 210
14:00 1 75 92 2 2 19 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 201
15:00 2 102 66 0 6 14 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 200
16:00 4 83 69 2 2 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 172
17:00 0 102 44 0 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 159
18:00 0 59 8 0 2 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 75
19:00 2 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 32
20:00 2 24 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 31
21:00 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
22:00 0 8 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 15
23:00 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7
Total 19 1143 782 7 59 201 118 8 49 0 33 0 0 2419
Percent 0.8% 47.3% 32.3% 0.3% 2.4% 8.3% 4.9% 0.3% 2.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% AM Peak 10:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 09:00 07:00 07:00 10:00 09:00 11:00 Vol. 3 68 77 1 9 28 20 3 8 4 175
PM Peak 16:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 14:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 17:00 13:00 Vol. 4 102 92 2 7 19 11 3 5 5 210

Grand
Total 19 1143 782 7 59 201 118 8 49 0 33 0 0 2419
Percent 0.8% 47.3% 32.3% 0.3% 2.4% 8.3% 4.9% 0.3% 2.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix D - 92
Item Title:11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 732
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1362 of 3153

Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse
Traffic Study
June 2025

54 APPENDIX E:

Volume Development Worksheets

trans!utions
the tr.in~port.1bu11 ~olutiun~ comp,111q
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 733
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1363 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume 1 . Trumble Road & Watson Road
NBL 8 1 16 4 46 54 3 0 9 1 21 24
NBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
NBR 1 5201 62 1 1 6000 01 6
SBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBT 0 000 00 1 000 01
SBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBT 4 106 20 24 1 4107 23 37
EBR 12 3 1 10 37 49 2 3001 32 6
WBL 1 9111 72 6 2 4100 22 6
WBT 74 1 1 0 38 45 2 006 18 20
WBR 1 000 01 0 000 00
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Departure 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
South Leg
Approach 23 3 16 5 52 75 19 0 9 1 21 40
Departure 31 4 2 11 44 75 48 1 0 1 5 53
Total 54 7 18 16 96 150 67 1 9 2 26 93
East Leg
Approach 27 5 2 11 45 72 26 1 0 6 20 46
Departure 19 3 0 7 26 45 30 1 0 7 23 53
Total 46 8 2 18 71 117 56 2 0 13 43 99
West Leg
Approach 16 4 1 16 57 73 37 1 0 8 26 63
Departure 15 5 17 14 84 99 5 0 9 7 39 44
Total 31 9 18 30 141 172 42 1 9 15 65 107
Total Approaches
Approach 66 12 19 32 154 220 83 2 9 15 67 150
Departure 66 12 19 32 154 220 83 2 9 15 67 150
Total 132 24 38 64 308 440 166 4 18 30 134 300
TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 1
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 734
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1364 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
2 . Trumble Road & Driveway 1
N B L 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0
NBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
NBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Approaches
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 2
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 735
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1365 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
3 . Trumble Road & Driveway 2
N B L 0 000 0 0 4 000 0 4
NBT 6 4000 06 4 4 4000 04 4
NBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBT 7 5000 07 5 5 3000 05 3
SBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBL 1 1000 01 1 0 000 00
EBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBR 9 000 09 5 000 05
WBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
North Leg
Approach 75 0 0 0 0 75 53 0 0 0 0 53
Departure 75 0 0 0 0 75 44 0 0 0 0 44
Total 150 0 0 0 0 150 97 0 0 0 0 97
South Leg
Approach 64 0 0 0 0 64 48 0 0 0 0 48
Departure 84 0 0 0 0 84 58 0 0 0 0 58
Total 148 0 0 0 0 148 106 0 0 0 0 106
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Leg
Approach 20 0 0 0 0 20 5 0 0 0 0 5
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
Total 20 0 0 0 0 20 9 0 0 0 0 9
Total Approaches
Approach 159 0 0 0 0 159 106 0 0 0 0 106
Departure 159 0 0 0 0 159 106 0 0 0 0 106
Total 318 0 0 0 0 318 212 0 0 0 0 212
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 3
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 736
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1366 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
4 . Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
N B L 5 4200 35 7 3 5200 33 8
NBT 17 3 12 3 38 55 9 092 24 33
NBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBT 25 2 2 13 46 71 4 1110 44 5
SBR 1 1100 21 3 1 1100 21 3
EBL 7 100 29 1 1000 01 1
EBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBR 4 4101 54 9 7 0100 27 2
WBL 0 000 00 1 000 01
WBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
WBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
North Leg
Approach 36 3 2 13 48 84 52 2 1 0 6 58
Departure 24 4 12 3 40 64 20 0 9 2 24 44
Total 60 7 14 16 88 148 72 2 10 2 30 102
South Leg
Approach 71 5 12 3 41 112 44 2 9 2 27 71
Departure 69 3 2 14 51 120 112 2 1 0 6 118
Total 140 8 14 17 92 232 156 4 10 2 33 189
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
West Leg
Approach 51 2 0 1 7 58 81 1 0 0 2 83
Departure 65 3 0 0 5 70 46 3 0 0 5 51
Total 116 5 0 1 12 128 127 4 0 0 7 134
Total Approaches
Approach 158 10 14 17 96 254 178 5 10 2 35 213
Departure 158 10 14 17 96 254 178 5 10 2 35 213
Total 316 20 28 34 192 508 356 10 20 4 70 426
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 4
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 737
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1367 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
5 . Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
NBL 66 7 0 0 11 77 67 3 0 1 8 75
NBT 1 1110 41 5 1 020 45
NBR 2 4301 83 2 4 1200 34 4
SBL 5 205 18 23 2 0000 02 0
SBT 6 401 91 5 8 000 08
SBR 51 1 2 11 39 90 9 8210 5 103
EBL 5 3272 23 76 4 1281 22 63
EBT 516 12 2 5 37 553 662 14 2 6 43 705
EBR 2 3210 52 8 1 9112 10 29
WBL 2 5402 12 37 2 3100 22 5
WBT 507 10 1 4 29 536 377 3 0 2 11 388
WBR 1 2111 71 9 1 0010 21 2
North Leg
Approach 62 7 2 17 66 128 126 2 1 0 5 131
Departure 76 4 9 3 34 110 52 2 11 1 28 80
Total 138 11 11 20 100 238 178 4 12 1 33 211
South Leg
Approach 101 11 1 1 23 124 109 5 2 1 15 124
Departure 54 10 1 3 26 80 50 2 1 2 12 62
Total 155 21 2 4 49 204 159 7 3 3 27 186
East Leg
Approach 544 15 2 7 48 592 410 4 1 2 15 425
Departure 545 17 2 11 63 608 723 16 2 6 46 769
Total ###
# 32 4 18 111 1,200 ### # 20 3 8 61 1,194
West Leg
Approach 592 16 10 7 65 657 722 17 11 9 75 797
Departure 624 18 3 15 79 703 542 8 1 3 24 566
Total ###
# 34 13 22 144 1,360 ### # 25 12 12 99 1,363
Total Approaches
Approach ### # 49 15 32 202 1,501 ### # 28 15 12 110 1,477 Departure ### # 49 15 32 202 1,501 ### # 28 15 12 110 1,477 Total ### # 98 30 64 404 3,002 ### # 56 30 24 220 2,954 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 5
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 738
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1368 of 3153

Total Total
Pass. PCE Pass. PCE
Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume Veh. 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle PCE Volume TrucksTrucks
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Table E-1: Existing Peak Hour Volumes
(Intersections With Classification Counts)
6 . Watson Road and SR-74
N B L 7 100 2 9 1 2100 21 4
NBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
NBR 1 2204 15 27 1 5004 12 27
SBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBT 0 000 00 0 000 00
SBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBL 0 000 00 0 000 00
EBT 641 30 8 21 124 765 #### 17 2 7 51 1,172
EBR 2 0020 42 4 5 001 38
WBL 2 5205 18 43 1 0004 12 22
WBT #### 18 13 24 125 1,357 880 14 7 8 59 939
WBR 0 000 00 0 000 00
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 19 3 0 4 17 36 27 1 0 4 14 41
Departure 45 2 2 5 22 67 15 0 0 5 15 30
Total 64 5 2 9 39 103 42 1 0 9 29 71
East Leg
Approach ### # 20 13 29 143 1,400 890 14 7 12 71 961
Departure 653 32 8 25 139 792 ### # 17 2 11 63 1,199
Total ### # 52 21 54 282 2,192 ### # 31 9 23 134 2,160
West Leg
Approach 661 30 10 21 128 789 ### # 17 2 8 54 1,180
Departure ### # 19 13 24 127 1,366 892 15 7 8 61 953
Total ### # 49 23 45 255 2,155 ### # 32 9 16 115 2,133
Total Approaches
Approach ### # 53 23 54 288 2,225 ### # 32 9 24 139 2,182 Departure ### # 53 23 54 288 2,225 ### # 32 9 24 139 2,182 Total ### # 106 46 108 576 4,450 ### # 64 18 48 278 4,364 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Class
Appendix E - 6
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 739
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1369 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
1 . Trumble Road & Watson Road
NBL 54 0 54 24 0 24
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBR 21 3 24 16 10 26
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 1 0 1
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 24 0 24 37 0 37
EBR 49 0 49 26 0 26
WBL 26 10 36 26 3 29
WBT 45 0 45 20 0 20
WBR 1 0 1 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total 1 0 1 1 0 1
South Leg
Approach 75 3 78 40 10 50
Departure 75 10 85 53 3 56
Total 150 13 163 93 13 106
East Leg
Approach 72 10 82 46 3 49
Departure 45 3 48 53 10 63
Total 117 13 130 99 13 112
West Leg
Approach 73 0 73 63 0 63
Departure 99 0 99 44 0 44
Total 172 0 172 107 0 107
Total Approaches
Approach 220 13 233 150 13 163
Departure 220 13 233 150 13 163
Total 440 26 466 300 26 326
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 7
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 740
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1370 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
2 . Trumble Road & Driveway 1
NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBT 75 1 76 40 4 44
NBR 0 9 9 0 8 8
SBL 0 6 6 0 2 2
SBT 75 4 79 53 1 54
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 7 7 0 13 13
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 2 2 0 6 6
North Leg
Approach 75 10 85 53 3 56
Departure 75 3 78 40 10 50
Total 150 13 163 93 13 106
South Leg
Approach 75 10 85 40 12 52
Departure 75 11 86 53 14 67
Total 150 21 171 93 26 119
East Leg
Approach 0 9 9 0 19 19
Departure 0 15 15 0 10 10
Total 0 24 24 0 29 29
West Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Approaches
Approach 150 29 179 93 34 127
Departure 150 29 179 93 34 127
Total 300 58 358 186 68 254
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 8
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 741
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1371 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
3 . Trumble Road & Driveway 2
NBL 0 0 0 4 0 4
NBT 64 9 73 44 8 52
NBR 0 26 26 0 13 13
SBL 0 4 4 0 1 1
SBT 75 7 82 53 13 66
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 11 0 11 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 9 0 9 5 0 5
WBL 0 11 11 0 30 30
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 1 1 0 4 4
North Leg
Approach 75 11 86 53 14 67
Departure 75 10 85 44 12 56
Total 150 21 171 97 26 123
South Leg
Approach 64 35 99 48 21 69
Departure 84 18 102 58 43 101
Total 148 53 201 106 64 170
East Leg
Approach 0 12 12 0 34 34
Departure 0 30 30 0 14 14
Total 0 42 42 0 48 48
West Leg
Approach 20 0 20 5 0 5
Departure 0 0 0 4 0 4
Total 20 0 20 9 0 9
Total Approaches
Approach 159 58 217 106 69 175
Departure 159 58 217 106 69 175
Total 318 116 434 212 138 350
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 9
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 742
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1372 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
4 . Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
NBL 57 0 57 38 0 38
NBT 55 35 90 33 20 53
NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 71 18 89 45 42 87
SBR 13 0 13 13 0 13
EBL 9 0 9 11 0 11
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 49 0 49 72 0 72
WBL 0 0 0 1 0 1
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 84 18 102 58 42 100
Departure 64 35 99 44 20 64
Total 148 53 201 102 62 164
South Leg
Approach 112 35 147 71 20 91
Departure 120 18 138 118 42 160
Total 232 53 285 189 62 251
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 1
West Leg
Approach 58 0 58 83 0 83
Departure 70 0 70 51 0 51
Total 128 0 128 134 0 134
Total Approaches
Approach 254 53 307 213 62 275
Departure 254 53 307 213 62 275
Total 508 106 614 426 124 550
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 10
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 743
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1373 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
5 . Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
NBL 77 0 77 75 0 75
NBT 15 6 21 5 2 7
NBR 32 0 32 44 0 44
SBL 23 1 24 20 4 24
SBT 15 2 17 8 6 14
SBR 90 15 105 103 32 135
EBL 76 26 102 63 18 81
EBT 553 0 553 705 0 705
EBR 28 0 28 29 0 29
WBL 37 0 37 25 0 25
WBT 536 0 536 388 0 388
WBR 19 4 23 12 1 13
North Leg
Approach 128 18 146 131 42 173
Departure 110 36 146 80 21 101
Total 238 54 292 211 63 274
South Leg
Approach 124 6 130 124 2 126
Departure 80 2 82 62 6 68
Total 204 8 212 186 8 194
East Leg
Approach 592 4 596 425 1 426
Departure 608 1 609 769 4 773
Total 1,200 5 1,205 1,194 5 1,199
West Leg
Approach 657 26 683 797 18 815
Departure 703 15 718 566 32 598
Total 1,360 41 1,401 1,363 50 1,413
Total Approaches
Approach 1,501 54 1,555 1,477 63 1,540
Departure 1,501 54 1,555 1,477 63 1,540
Total 3,002 108 3,110 2,954 126 3,080
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 11
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 744
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1374 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...

Existing NP
Volumes
Projec
t Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Existing NP
Volumes
Project
Trips
Existing WP
Volumes
Table E-2: Existing Peak Hour Volume Summary
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
6 . Watson Road and SR-74
NBL 9 3 12 14 10 24
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBR 27 0 27 27 0 27
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 765 0 765 1,172 0 1,172
EBR 24 10 34 8 3 11
WBL 43 0 43 22 0 22
WBT 1,357 0 1,357 939 0 939
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 36 3 39 41 10 51
Departure 67 10 77 30 3 33
Total 103 13 116 71 13 84
East Leg
Approach 1,400 0 1,400 961 0 961
Departure 792 0 792 1,199 0 1,199
Total 2,192 0 2,192 2,160 0 2,160
West Leg
Approach 789 10 799 1,180 3 1,183
Departure 1,366 3 1,369 953 10 963
Total 2,155 13 2,168 2,133 13 2,146
Total Approaches
Approach 2,225 13 2,238 2,182 13 2,195
Departure 2,225 13 2,238 2,182 13 2,195
Total 4,450 26 4,476 4,364 26 4,390
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\Exist TM Appendix E - 12
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 745
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1375 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips 1 . Trumble Road & Watson Road
NBL 54 2 56 0 56 24 1 25 0 25
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBR 21 1 22 3 25 16 0 16 10 26
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 24 1 25 0 25 37 1 38 0 38
EBR 49 1 50 0 50 26 1 27 0 27
WBL 26 1 27 10 37 26 1 27 3 30
WBT 45 1 46 0 46 20 1 21 0 21
WBR 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
Departure 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
South Leg
Approach 75 3 78 3 81 40 1 41 10 51
Departure 75 2 77 10 87 53 2 55 3 58
Total 150 5 155 13 168 93 3 96 13 109
East Leg
Approach 72 2 74 10 84 46 2 48 3 51
Departure 45 2 47 3 50 53 1 54 10 64
Total 117 4 121 13 134 99 3 102 13 115
West Leg
Approach 73 2 75 0 75 63 2 65 0 65
Departure 99 3 102 0 102 44 2 46 0 46
Total 172 5 177 0 177 107 4 111 0 111
Total Approaches
Approach 220 7 227 13 240 150 5 155 13 168
Departure 220 7 227 13 240 150 5 155 13 168
Total 440 14 454 26 480 300 10 310 26 336
Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hou
r PM Peak Hour
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 13
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 746
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1376 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
2 Trumble Road & Driveway 1
NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBT 75 2 77 1 78 40 1 41 4 45
NBR 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 8 8
SBL 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 2 2
SBT 75 2 77 4 81 53 2 55 1 56
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 13 13
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 6 6
North Leg
Approach 75 2 77 10 87 53 2 55 3 58
Departure 75 2 77 3 80 40 1 41 10 51
Total 150 4 154 13 167 93 3 96 13 109
South Leg
Approach 75 2 77 10 87 40 1 41 12 53
Departure 75 2 77 11 88 53 2 55 14 69
Total 150 4 154 21 175 93 3 96 26 122
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 19 19
Departure 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 10 10
Total 0 0 0 24 24 0 0 0 29 29
West Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Approaches
Approach 150 4 154 29 183 93 3 96 34 130
Departure 150 4 154 29 183 93 3 96 34 130
Total 300 8 308 58 366 186 6 192 68 260
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 14
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 747
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1377 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
3 Trumble Road & Driveway 2
NBL 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4
NBT 64 2 66 9 75 44 1 45 8 53
NBR 0 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 13 13
SBL 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 1
SBT 75 2 77 7 84 53 2 55 13 68
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 11 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 9 0 9 0 9 5 0 5 0 5
WBL 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 30 30
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 4
North Leg
Approach 75 2 77 11 88 53 2 55 14 69
Departure 75 2 77 10 87 44 1 45 12 57
Total 150 4 154 21 175 97 3 100 26 126
South Leg
Approach 64 2 66 35 101 48 1 49 21 70
Departure 84 2 86 18 104 58 2 60 43 103
Total 148 4 152 53 205 106 3 109 64 173
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 34 34
Departure 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0 14 14
Total 0 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 48 48
West Leg
Approach 20 0 20 0 20 5 0 5 0 5
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4
Total 20 0 20 0 20 9 0 9 0 9
Total Approaches
Approach 159 4 163 58 221 106 3 109 69 178
Departure 159 4 163 58 221 106 3 109 69 178
Total 318 8 326 116 442 212 6 218 138 356
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 15
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 748
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1378 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
4 Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
NBL 57 2 59 0 59 38 1 39 0 39
NBT 55 2 57 35 92 33 1 34 20 54
NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 71 2 73 18 91 45 1 46 42 88
SBR 13 0 13 0 13 13 0 13 0 13
EBL 9 0 9 0 9 11 0 11 0 11
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBR 49 1 50 0 50 72 2 74 0 74
WBL 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 84 2 86 18 104 58 1 59 42 101
Departure 64 2 66 35 101 44 1 45 20 65
Total 148 4 152 53 205 102 2 104 62 166
South Leg
Approach 112 4 116 35 151 71 2 73 20 93
Departure 120 3 123 18 141 118 3 121 42 163
Total 232 7 239 53 292 189 5 194 62 256
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
West Leg
Approach 58 1 59 0 59 83 2 85 0 85
Departure 70 2 72 0 72 51 1 52 0 52
Total 128 3 131 0 131 134 3 137 0 137
Total Approaches
Approach 254 7 261 53 314 213 5 218 62 280
Departure 254 7 261 53 314 213 5 218 62 280
Total 508 14 522 106 628 426 10 436 124 560
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 16
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 749
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1379 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
5 Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
NBL 77 2 79 0 79 75 2 77 0 77
NBT 15 0 15 6 21 5 0 5 2 7
NBR 32 1 33 0 33 44 1 45 0 45
SBL 23 1 24 1 25 20 1 21 4 25
SBT 15 0 15 2 17 8 0 8 6 14
SBR 90 3 93 15 108 103 3 106 32 138
EBL 76 2 78 26 104 63 2 65 18 83
EBT 553 17 570 0 570 705 21 726 0 726
EBR 28 1 29 0 29 29 1 30 0 30
WBL 37 1 38 0 38 25 1 26 0 26
WBT 536 16 552 0 552 388 12 400 0 400
WBR 19 1 20 4 24 12 0 12 1 13
North Leg
Approach 128 4 132 18 150 131 4 135 42 177
Departure 110 3 113 36 149 80 2 82 21 103
Total 238 7 245 54 299 211 6 217 63 280
South Leg
Approach 124 3 127 6 133 124 3 127 2 129
Departure 80 2 82 2 84 62 2 64 6 70
Total 204 5 209 8 217 186 5 191 8 199
East Leg
Approach 592 18 610 4 614 425 13 438 1 439
Departure 608 19 627 1 628 769 23 792 4 796
Total 1,200 37 1,237 5 1,242 1,194 36 1,230 5 1,235
West Leg
Approach 657 20 677 26 703 797 24 821 18 839
Departure 703 21 724 15 739 566 17 583 32 615
Total 1,360 41 1,401 41 1,442 1,363 41 1,404 50 1,454
Total Approaches
Approach 1,501 45 1,546 54 1,600 1,477 44 1,521 63 1,584 Departure 1,501 45 1,546 54 1,600 1,477 44 1,521 63 1,584 Total 3,002 90 3,092 108 3,200 2,954 88 3,042 126 3,168 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 17
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 750
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1380 of 3153

OY OY OY OY
Exist Without Project With Exis t Without Project With
Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-3 - Opening Year (2026) Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
6 Watson Road and SR-74
NBL 9 0 9 3 12 14 0 14 10 24
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NBR 27 1 28 0 28 27 1 28 0 28
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 765 23 788 0 788 1,172 35 1207 0 1,207
EBR 24 1 25 10 35 8 0 8 3 11
WBL 43 1 44 0 44 22 1 23 0 23
WBT 1,357 41 1398 0 1,398 939 28 967 0 967
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 36 1 37 3 40 41 1 42 10 52
Departure 67 2 69 10 79 30 1 31 3 34
Total 103 3 106 13 119 71 2 73 13 86
East Leg
Approach 1,400 42 1,442 0 1,442 961 29 990 0 990
Departure 792 24 816 0 816 1,199 36 1,235 0 1,235
Total 2,192 66 2,258 0 2,258 2,160 65 2,225 0 2,225
West Leg
Approach 789 24 813 10 823 1,180 35 1,215 3 1,218
Departure 1,366 41 1,407 3 1,410 953 28 981 10 991
Total 2,155 65 2,220 13 2,233 2,133 63 2,196 13 2,209
Total Approaches
Approach 2,225 67 2,292 13 2,305 2,182 65 2,247 13 2,260 Departure 2,225 67 2,292 13 2,305 2,182 65 2,247 13 2,260 Total 4,450 134 4,584 26 4,610 4,364 130 4,494 26 4,520 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY TM
Appendix E - 18
tran sluti o ns h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 751
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1381 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips 1 . Trumble Road & Watson Road
NBL 54 2 10 66 0 66 24 1 14 39 0 39
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
NBR 21 1 41 63 3 66 16 0 46 62 10 72
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 1 0 1
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBT 24 1 0 25 0 25 37 1 0 38 0 38
EBR 49 1 12 62 0 62 26 1 14 41 0 41
WBL 26 1 43 70 10 80 26 1 46 73 3 76
WBT 45 1 0 46 0 46 20 1 0 21 0 21
WBR 1 0 0 1 0 1 000 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
South Leg
Approach 75 3 51 129 3 132 40 1 60 101 10 111
Departure 75 2 55 132 10 142 53 2 60 115 3 118
Total 150 5 106 261 13 274 93 3 120 216 13 229
East Leg
Approach 72 2 43 117 10 127 46 2 46 94 3 97
Departure 45 2 41 88 3 91 53 1 46 100 10 110
Total 117 4 84 205 13 218 99 3 92 194 13 207
West Leg
Approach 73 2 12 87 0 87 63 2 14 79 0 79
Departure 99 3 10 112 0 112 44 2 14 60 0 60
Total 172 5 22 199 0 199 107 4 28 139 0 139
Total Approaches
Approach 220 7 106 333 13 346 150 5 120 275 13 288
Departure 220 7 106 333 13 346 150 5 120 275 13 288
Total 440 14 212 666 26 692 300 10 240 550 26 576
Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 19
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 752
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1382 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
2 Trumble Road & Driveway 1
NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
NBT 75 2 51 128 1 129 40 1 60 101 4 105
NBR 0 0 0 0 9 9 000 0 8 8
SBL 0 0 0 0 6 6 000 0 2 2
SBT 75 2 54 131 4 135 53 2 60 115 1 116
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0 7 7 000 0 13 13
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0 2 2 000 0 6 6
North Leg
Approach 75 2 54 131 10 141 53 2 60 115 3 118
Departure 75 2 51 128 3 131 40 1 60 101 10 111
Total 150 4 105 259 13 272 93 3 120 216 13 229
South Leg
Approach 75 2 51 128 10 138 40 1 60 101 12 113
Departure 75 2 54 131 11 142 53 2 60 115 14 129
Total 150 4 105 259 21 280 93 3 120 216 26 242
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 19 19
Departure 0 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 10 10
Total 0 0 0 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 29 29
West Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Approaches
Approach 150 4 105 259 29 288 93 3 120 216 34 250
Departure 150 4 105 259 29 288 93 3 120 216 34 250
Total 300 8 210 518 58 576 186 6 240 432 68 500
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 20
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 753
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1383 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
3 Trumble Road & Driveway 2
NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 4 0 4
NBT 64 2 51 117 9 126 44 1 60 105 8 113
NBR 0 0 0 0 26 26 000 0 13 13
SBL 0 0 0 0 4 4 000 0 1 1
SBT 75 2 54 131 7 138 53 2 60 115 13 128
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBL 11 0 0 11 0 11 000 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBR 9 0 0 9 0 9 500 5 0 5
WBL 0 0 0 0 11 11 000 0 30 30
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0 1 1 000 0 4 4
North Leg
Approach 75 2 54 131 11 142 53 2 60 115 14 129
Departure 75 2 51 128 10 138 44 1 60 105 12 117
Total 150 4 105 259 21 280 97 3 120 220 26 246
South Leg
Approach 64 2 51 117 35 152 48 1 60 109 21 130
Departure 84 2 54 140 18 158 58 2 60 120 43 163
Total 148 4 105 257 53 310 106 3 120 229 64 293
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 34 34
Departure 0 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0 0 14 14
Total 0 0 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 48 48
West Leg
Approach 20 0 0 20 0 20 5 0 0 5 0 5
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 4
Total 20 0 0 20 0 20 9 0 0 9 0 9
Total Approaches
Approach 159 4 105 268 58 326 106 3 120 229 69 298
Departure 159 4 105 268 58 326 106 3 120 229 69 298
Total 318 8 210 536 116 652 212 6 240 458 138 596
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 21
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 754
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1384 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
4 Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
NBL 57 2 12 71 0 71 38 1 21 60 0 60
NBT 55 2 51 108 35 143 33 1 60 94 20 114
NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
SBT 71 2 54 127 18 145 45 1 60 106 42 148
SBR 13 0 0 13 0 13 13 0 0 13 0 13
EBL 9 0 0 9 0 9 11 0 0 11 0 11
EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBR 49 1 14 64 0 64 72 2 21 95 0 95
WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 1 0 1
WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 84 2 54 140 18 158 58 1 60 119 42 161
Departure 64 2 51 117 35 152 44 1 60 105 20 125
Total 148 4 105 257 53 310 102 2 120 224 62 286
South Leg
Approach 112 4 63 179 35 214 71 2 81 154 20 174
Departure 120 3 68 191 18 209 118 3 81 202 42 244
Total 232 7 131 370 53 423 189 5 162 356 62 418
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
West Leg
Approach 58 1 14 73 0 73 83 2 21 106 0 106
Departure 70 2 12 84 0 84 51 1 21 73 0 73
Total 128 3 26 157 0 157 134 3 42 179 0 179
Total Approaches
Approach 254 7 131 392 53 445 213 5 162 380 62 442
Departure 254 7 131 392 53 445 213 5 162 380 62 442
Total 508 14 262 784 106 890 426 10 324 760 124 884
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 22
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 755
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1385 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
5 Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
NBL 77 2 113 192 0 192 75 2 265 342 0 342
NBT 15 0 52 67 6 73 5 0 81 86 2 88
NBR 32 1 39 72 0 72 44 1 209 254 0 254
SBL 23 1 54 78 1 79 20 1 63 84 4 88
SBT 15 0 68 83 2 85 8 0 90 98 6 104
SBR 90 3 91 184 15 199 103 3 81 187 32 219
EBL 76 2 89 167 26 193 63 2 79 144 18 162
EBT 553 17 555 1125 0 1,125 705 21 392 1118 0 1,118
EBR 28 1 133 162 0 162 29 1 244 274 0 274
WBL 37 1 63 101 0 101 25 1 196 222 0 222
WBT 536 16 416 968 0 968 388 12 558 958 0 958
WBR 19 1 60 80 4 84 12 0 59 71 1 72
North Leg
Approach 128 4 213 345 18 363 131 4 234 369 42 411
Departure 110 3 201 314 36 350 80 2 219 301 21 322
Total 238 7 414 659 54 713 211 6 453 670 63 733
South Leg
Approach 124 3 204 331 6 337 124 3 555 682 2 684
Departure 80 2 264 346 2 348 62 2 530 594 6 600
Total 204 5 468 677 8 685 186 5 1,085 1,276 8 1,284
East Leg
Approach 592 18 539 1,149 4 1,153 425 13 813 1,251 1 1,252 Departure 608 19 648 1,275 1 1,276 769 23 664 1,456 4 1,460 Total 1,200 37 1,187 2,424 5 2,429 1,194 36 1,477 2,707 5 2,712 West Leg
Approach 657 20 777 1,454 26 1,480 797 24 715 1,536 18 1,554 Departure 703 21 620 1,344 15 1,359 566 17 904 1,487 32 1,519 Total 1,360 41 1,397 2,798 41 2,839 1,363 41 1,619 3,023 50 3,073 Total Approaches
Approach 1,501 45 1,733 3,279 54 3,333 1,477 44 2,317 3,838 63 3,901 Departure 1,501 45 1,733 3,279 54 3,333 1,477 44 2,317 3,838 63 3,901 Total 3,002 90 3,466 6,558 108 6,666 2,954 88 4,634 7,676 126 7,802 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 23
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 756
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1386 of 3153

Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Cumulative OY Cumul OY Cumul Exist Project Without Project With Exis t Project Without Project With Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Volumes Growth Trips Project Trips Trips Project Trips Table E-4 - Opening Year (2026) Cumulative Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
6 Watson Road and SR-74
NBL 9 0 20 29 3 32 14 0 23 37 10 47
NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
NBR 27 1 20 48 0 48 27 1 23 51 0 51
SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
EBT 765 23 120 908 0 908 1,172 35 130 1337 0 1,337
EBR 24 1 21 46 10 56 8 0 22 30 3 33
WBL 43 1 21 65 0 65 22 1 22 45 0 45
WBT 1,357 41 126 1524 0 1,524 939 28 138 1105 0 1,105
WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 36 1 40 77 3 80 41 1 46 88 10 98
Departure 67 2 42 111 10 121 30 1 44 75 3 78
Total 103 3 82 188 13 201 71 2 90 163 13 176
East Leg
Approach 1,400 42 147 1,589 0 1,589 961 29 160 1,150 0 1,150 Departure 792 24 140 956 0 956 1,199 36 153 1,388 0 1,388 Total 2,192 66 287 2,545 0 2,545 2,160 65 313 2,538 0 2,538 West Leg
Approach 789 24 141 954 10 964 1,180 35 152 1,367 3 1,370 Departure 1,366 41 146 1,553 3 1,556 953 28 161 1,142 10 1,152 Total 2,155 65 287 2,507 13 2,520 2,133 63 313 2,509 13 2,522 Total Approaches
Approach 2,225 67 328 2,620 13 2,633 2,182 65 358 2,605 13 2,618 Departure 2,225 67 328 2,620 13 2,633 2,182 65 358 2,605 13 2,618 Total 4,450 134 656 5,240 26 5,266 4,364 130 716 5,210 26 5,236 P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\ OY Cumul TM Appendix E - 24
translutions h, 1,, .,,,,nt d1(, 1 .,t l1it ,11., t n,,, ,r (I Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 757
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1387 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
1 . Trumble Road & Watson Road
NBL 69 0 69 41 0 41
N B T 000 000
NBR 266 3 269 182 10 192
S B L 000 000
S B T 000 101
S B R 000 000
E B L 000 000
EBT 26 0 26 40 0 40
EBR 65 0 65 43 0 43
WBL 254 10 264 237 3 240
WBT 48 0 48 22 0 22
W B R 101 000
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total 1 0 1 1 0 1
South Leg
Approach 335 3 338 223 10 233
Departure 319 10 329 281 3 284
Total 654 13 667 504 13 517
East Leg
Approach 303 10 313 259 3 262
Departure 292 3 295 222 10 232
Total 596 13 609 481 13 494
West Leg
Approach 91 0 91 83 0 83
Departure 118 0 118 63 0 63
Total 209 0 209 146 0 146

Total Approaches
Approach 730 13 743 566 13 579
Departure 730 13 743 566 13 579
Total 1,460 26 1,486 1,132 26 1,158
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 25
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 758
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1388 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary 2 . Trumble Road & Driveway 1
N B L 000 000
NBT 335 1 336 223 4 227
N B R 099 088
S B L 066 022
SBT 319 4 323 281 1 282
S B R 000 000
E B L 000 000
E B T 000 000
E B R 000 000
WBL 0 7 7 0 13 13
W B T 000 000
W B R 022 066
North Leg
Approach 319 10 329 281 3 284
Departure 335 3 338 223 10 233
Total 654 13 667 504 13 517
South Leg
Approach 335 10 345 223 12 235
Departure 319 11 330 281 14 295
Total 654 21 675 504 26 530
East Leg
Approach 0 9 9 0 19 19
Departure 0 15 15 0 10 10
Total 0 24 24 0 29 29
West Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Approaches
Approach 654 29 683 504 34 538
Departure 654 29 683 504 34 538
Total 1,309 58 1,367 1,008 68 1,076
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 26
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 759
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1389 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary 3 . Trumble Road & Driveway 2
N B L 000 404
NBT 292 9 301 198 8 206
NBR 0 26 26 0 13 13
S B L 044 011
SBT 288 7 295 268 13 281
S B R 000 000
EBL 12 0 12 0 0 0
E B T 000 000
E B R 909 505
WBL 0 11 11 0 30 30
W B T 000 000
W B R 011 044
North Leg
Approach 288 11 299 268 14 282
Departure 304 10 314 198 12 210
Total 592 21 613 466 26 492
South Leg
Approach 292 35 327 202 21 223
Departure 297 18 315 273 43 316
Total 589 53 642 475 64 539
East Leg
Approach 0 12 12 0 34 34
Departure 0 30 30 0 14 14
Total 0 42 42 0 48 48
West Leg
Approach 21 0 21 5 0 5
Departure 0 0 0 4 0 4
Total 21 0 21 9 0 9
Total Approaches
Approach 601 58 659 475 69 544
Departure 601 58 659 475 69 544
Total 1,202 116 1,318 951 138 1,089
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 27
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 760
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1390 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary 4 . Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
NBL 75 0 75 63 0 63
NBT 281 35 316 183 20 203
N B R 000 000
S B L 000 000
SBT 275 18 293 257 42 299
SBR 14 0 14 14 0 14
EBL 11 0 11 15 0 15
E B T 000 000
EBR 67 0 67 100 0 100
W B L 000 101
W B T 000 000
W B R 000 000
North Leg
Approach 289 18 307 271 42 313
Departure 292 35 327 198 20 218
Total 581 53 634 469 62 531
South Leg
Approach 356 35 391 246 20 266
Departure 342 18 360 358 42 400
Total 698 53 751 604 62 666
East Leg
Approach 0 0 0 1 0 1
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 1
West Leg
Approach 78 0 78 115 0 115
Departure 88 0 88 77 0 77
Total 166 0 166 191 0 191
Total Approaches
Approach 722 53 775 632 62 694
Departure 722 53 775 632 62 694
Total 1,445 106 1,551 1,265 124 1,389
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 28
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 761
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1391 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary 5 . Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
NBL 202 0 202 359 0 359
NBT 70 6 76 90 2 92
NBR 76 0 76 267 0 267
SBL 82 1 83 88 4 92
SBT 87 2 89 103 6 109
SBR 193 15 208 196 32 228
EBL 175 26 201 151 18 169
EBT 1,181 0 1,181 1,174 0 1,174
EBR 170 0 170 288 0 288
WBL 106 0 106 233 0 233
WBT 1,016 0 1,016 1,006 0 1,006
WBR 84 4 88 75 1 76
North Leg
Approach 362 18 380 387 42 429
Departure 330 36 366 316 21 337
Total 692 54 746 704 63 767
South Leg
Approach 348 6 354 716 2 718
Departure 363 2 365 624 6 630
Total 711 8 719 1,340 8 1,348
East Leg
Approach 1,206 4 1,210 1,314 1 1,315
Departure 1,339 1 1,340 1,529 4 1,533
Total 2,545 5 2,550 2,842 5 2,847
West Leg
Approach 1,527 26 1,553 1,613 18 1,631
Departure 1,411 15 1,426 1,561 32 1,593
Total 2,938 41 2,979 3,174 50 3,224
Total Approaches
Approach 3,443 54 3,497 4,030 63 4,093
Departure 3,443 54 3,497 4,030 63 4,093
Total 6,886 108 6,994 8,060 126 8,186
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 29
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 762
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1392 of 3153

the transportation solutions company...
2050 2050 2050 2050
NP Project With NP Project With
Trips Project Trips Project
Table E-5: Horizon Year (2050) With Project Peak Hour Volume Summary 6 . Watson Road and SR-74
NBL 56 3 59 65 10 75
N B T 000 000
NBR 233 0 233 161 0 161
S B L 000 000
S B T 000 000
S B R 000 000
E B L 000 000
EBT 1,317 0 1,317 1,679 0 1,679
EBR 108 10 118 45 3 48
WBL 209 0 209 192 0 192
WBT 1,734 0 1,734 1,419 0 1,419
W B R 000 000
North Leg
Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0
Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Leg
Approach 289 3 292 226 10 236
Departure 317 10 327 237 3 240
Total 606 13 619 463 13 476
East Leg
Approach 1,943 0 1,943 1,611 0 1,611
Departure 1,550 0 1,550 1,840 0 1,840
Total 3,493 0 3,493 3,451 0 3,451
West Leg
Approach 1,425 10 1,435 1,724 3 1,727
Departure 1,790 3 1,793 1,484 10 1,494
Total 3,215 13 3,228 3,208 13 3,221
Total Approaches
Approach 3,657 13 3,670 3,561 13 3,574
Departure 3,657 13 3,670 3,561 13 3,574
Total 7,314 26 7,340 7,122 26 7,148
P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\Analysis\Analysis\2050 TM
Appendix E - 30
translutions
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 763
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1393 of 3153

Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse
Traffic Study
June 2025

55 APPENDIX F:

Level of Service Worksheets

trans!utions
the tr.in~port.1bu11 ~olutiun~ comp,111q
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 764
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1394 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 01 Existing AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 24 49 26 45 1 54 0 21 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 24 49 26 45 1 54 0 21 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 45 02 74 6 15 5 02 1 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 47 0 0 74 0 0 148 149 49 124 174 46 Stage 1 - ----- 4 9 4 9- 9 9 9 9-
Stage 2 - ----- 9 9 1 0 0- 2 4 7 4-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1561 - - 1525 - - 820 742 1019 850 719 1023 Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 4 8 5 4- 9 0 7 8 1 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 9 0 7 8 1 2- 9 9 3 8 3 3-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1561 - - 1525 - - 805 729 1019 818 706 1023 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 8 0 5 7 2 9- 8 1 8 7 0 6-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 4 8 5 4- 8 9 1 7 9 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 9 1 7 9 8- 9 7 2 8 3 3-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 2.67 9.62 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 855 1561 - - 647 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 - - - 0.017 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.6 0 - - 7.4 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - -
Appendix F - 1
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 765
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1395 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 01 Existing AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 75 0
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 1090000 6 400 7 50
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 10 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 82 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 151 151 82 151 151 70 82 0 0 70 0 0 Stage 1 82 82 - 70 70 -------
Stage 2 70 70 - 82 82 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 816 741 978 816 741 993 1516 - - 1531 - - Stage 1 927 827 - 940 837 -------
Stage 2 940 837 - 927 827 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 741 978 808 741 993 1516 - - 1531 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 849 761 - 843 761 -------
Stage 1 927 827 - 940 837 -------
Stage 2 940 837 - 918 827 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.09 0 0 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1516 - - 902 - 1531 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.024 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.1 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 2
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 766
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1396 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 01 Existing AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 49 0 0 0 57 55 0 0 71 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 49 0 0 0 57 55 0 0 71 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 52 0 0 0 61 59 0 0 76 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 262 262 82 255 269 59 89 0 0 59 0 0 Stage 1 82 82 - 180 180 -------
Stage 2 180 180 - 76 89 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 691 643 977 698 637 1007 1506 - - 1545 - - Stage 1 926 826 - 822 751 -------
Stage 2 822 751 - 934 821 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 663 617 977 634 611 1007 1506 - - 1545 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 733 670 - 709 659 -------
Stage 1 926 826 - 789 720 -------
Stage 2 789 720 - 884 821 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.06 0 3.81 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1506 - - 733 977 - 1545 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - - 0.013 0.053 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 10 8.9 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - AAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 3
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 767
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1397 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 01 Existing AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 76 553 28 37 536 19 77 15 32 23 15 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 76 553 28 37 536 19 77 15 32 23 15 90 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 628 32 42 609 22 88 17 36 26 17 102 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 152 798 676 108 721 26 154 185 391 90 72 430 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1794 65 1781 535 1132 1781 231 1389 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 628 32 42 0 631 88 0 53 26 0 119 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1859 1781 0 1667 1781 0 1620 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 24.7 1.0 1.9 0.0 26.2 4.1 0.0 1.8 1.2 0.0 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 24.7 1.0 1.9 0.0 26.2 4.1 0.0 1.8 1.2 0.0 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.86
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 152 798 676 108 0 747 154 0 576 90 0 502 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.79 0.05 0.39 0.00 0.84 0.57 0.00 0.09 0.29 0.00 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 344 1435 1216 156 0 1230 282 0 576 156 0 502 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.5 21.1 14.3 38.6 0.0 23.1 37.5 0.0 18.9 39.1 0.0 22.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 1.8 0.0 2.3 0.0 3.0 3.3 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 9.9 0.3 0.9 0.0 10.8 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.8 22.9 14.4 40.9 0.0 26.1 40.8 0.0 19.2 40.8 0.0 23.1 LnGrp LOS D C B D C D B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 746 673 141 145
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 27.0 32.7 26.3
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 32.0 7.7 38.9 9.9 28.9 9.8 36.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 3.8 3.9 26.7 6.1 6.7 6.0 28.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 4.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 26.4
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 4
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 768
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1398 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 01 Existing AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 765 24 43 1357 9 27
Future Vol, veh/h 765 24 43 1357 9 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 860 27 48 1525 10 30
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 887 0 1732 443
Stage 1 - - - - 873 -
Stage 2 - - - - 859 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 79 562
Stage 1 - - - - 369 -
Stage 2 - - - - 375 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 759 - 74 562
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 251 -
Stage 1 - - - - 369 -
Stage 2 - - - - 351 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.31 14.26

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 429 - - 759 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 - - 0.064 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.3 - - 10.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0.2 -
Appendix F - 5
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 769
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1399 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 02 Existing PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 26 26 20 0 24 0 16 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 26 26 20 0 24 0 16 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 05 63 93 93 0 03 6 02 4 0 2 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 30 0 0 95 0 0 186 185 76 165 205 30 Stage 1 - ----- 7 6 7 6- 1 0 9 1 0 9-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 1 0 1 0 9- 5 6 9 5-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1582 - - 1498 - - 775 709 985 799 692 1044 Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 3 8 3 2- 8 9 6 8 0 5-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 9 5 8 0 5- 9 5 6 8 1 6-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1582 - - 1498 - - 753 690 985 759 673 1044 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 5 3 6 9 0- 7 5 9 6 7 3-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 3 8 3 2- 8 7 2 7 8 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 7 0 7 8 4- 9 3 2 8 1 6-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.22 9.67 10.36

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 831 1582 - - 1017 - - 673
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - - - 0.026 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.5 0 - 10.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
Appendix F - 6
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 770
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1400 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 02 Existing PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 0050004 4 400 5 30
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 0050004 4 400 5 30
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 0050004 4 800 5 80
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 114 114 58 114 114 48 58 0 0 48 0 0 Stage 1 58 58 - 57 57 -------
Stage 2 57 57 - 58 58 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 863 776 1009 863 776 1021 1547 - - 1559 - - Stage 1 954 847 - 955 848 -------
Stage 2 955 848 - 954 847 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 860 774 1009 856 774 1021 1547 - - 1559 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 876 780 - 871 779 -------
Stage 1 954 847 - 953 845 -------
Stage 2 953 845 - 949 847 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.59 0 0.61 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1547 - - 1009 - 1559 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.005 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 - - 8.6 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 7
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 771
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1401 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 02 Existing PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 72 1 0 0 38 33 0 0 45 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 72 1 0 0 38 33 0 0 45 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 15 0 101 1 0 0 54 46 0 0 63 18
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 226 226 73 217 235 46 82 0 0 46 0 0 Stage 1 73 73 - 154 154 -------
Stage 2 154 154 - 63 82 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 729 673 990 739 665 1023 1516 - - 1561 - - Stage 1 937 835 - 849 770 -------
Stage 2 849 770 - 948 827 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 704 649 990 640 642 1023 1516 - - 1561 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 762 692 - 713 681 -------
Stage 1 937 835 - 819 743 -------
Stage 2 819 743 - 850 827 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.16 10.06 3.99 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1516 - - 762 990 713 1561 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.02 0.102 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 9.8 9.1 10.1 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - AABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.3 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 8
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 772
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1402 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02 Existing PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 63 705 29 25 388 12 75 5 44 20 8 103 Future Volume (veh/h) 63 705 29 25 388 12 75 5 44 20 8 103 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 69 775 32 27 426 13 82 5 48 22 9 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 129 899 762 90 829 25 146 46 446 83 32 403
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.46 0.46 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1805 55 1781 152 1456 1781 118 1485 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 69 775 32 27 0 439 82 0 53 22 0 122 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1860 1781 0 1608 1781 0 1603 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 31.8 0.9 1.3 0.0 14.5 3.8 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 31.8 0.9 1.3 0.0 14.5 3.8 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.93
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 129 899 762 90 0 854 146 0 492 83 0 435 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.86 0.04 0.30 0.00 0.51 0.56 0.00 0.11 0.26 0.00 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 257 1480 1255 154 0 1365 257 0 492 154 0 435 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.7 19.9 11.9 39.6 0.0 16.6 38.3 0.0 21.5 39.8 0.0 24.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 3.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.5 3.4 0.0 0.4 1.7 0.0 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 12.6 0.3 0.6 0.0 5.5 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 42.1 22.9 11.9 41.4 0.0 17.1 41.6 0.0 22.0 41.5 0.0 26.5 LnGrp LOS D C B D B D C D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 876 466 135 144
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.0 18.5 33.9 28.8
Approach LOS C B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 29.0 6.9 44.1 9.6 26.0 8.8 42.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 4.0 3.3 33.8 5.8 7.2 5.2 16.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 5.8 0.1 0.4 0.0 2.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.7
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 9
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 773
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1403 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 02 Existing PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1172 8 22 939 14 27
Future Vol, veh/h 1172 8 22 939 14 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1234 8 23 988 15 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1242 0 1778 621
Stage 1 - - - - 1238 -
Stage 2 - - - - 541 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 556 - 74 430
Stage 1 - - - - 237 -
Stage 2 - - - - 548 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 556 - 70 430
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 211 -
Stage 1 - - - - 237 -
Stage 2 - - - - 525 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.27 18.13

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 317 - - 556 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 - - 0.042 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 18.1 - - 11.8 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0.1 -
Appendix F - 10
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 774
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1404 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 03 Existing Plus Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 24 49 36 45 1 54 0 24 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 24 49 36 45 1 54 0 24 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 45 03 74 6 15 5 02 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 47 0 0 74 0 0 169 170 49 144 194 46 Stage 1 - ----- 4 9 4 9- 1 2 0 1 2 0-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 1 9 1 2 0- 2 4 7 4-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1561 - - 1525 - - 795 723 1019 825 701 1023 Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 4 8 5 4- 8 8 4 7 9 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 8 5 7 9 6- 9 9 3 8 3 3-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1561 - - 1525 - - 775 705 1019 785 684 1023 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 7 5 7 0 5- 7 8 5 6 8 4-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 4 8 5 4- 8 6 3 7 7 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 6 3 7 7 6- 9 6 9 8 3 3-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.26 9.75 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 837 1561 - - 787 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 - - - 0.024 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 0 - - 7.4 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - -
Appendix F - 11
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 775
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1405 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 03 Existing Plus Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 76 9 6 79
Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 76 9 6 79
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
M v m t F l o w 72 8 096 8 3
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 181 85 0 0 89 0
Stage 1 85 -----
Stage 2 96 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 809 974 - - 1506 -
Stage 1 939 -----
Stage 2 928 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 806 974 - - 1506 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 793 -----
Stage 1 939 -----
Stage 2 924 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.4 0 0.52

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 827 1506 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.011 0.004 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.4 7.4 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
Appendix F - 12
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 776
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1406 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 03 Existing Plus Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 7 3 2 64 8 20 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 7 3 2 64 8 20 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 1 209 1 2010 7 7 2 74 8 60
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 172 199 86 185 185 91 86 0 0 104 0 0 Stage 1 95 95 - 91 91 -------
Stage 2 77 104 - 95 95 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 792 697 972 776 709 967 1510 - - 1487 - - Stage 1 912 817 - 917 820 -------
Stage 2 932 809 - 912 817 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 789 695 972 766 707 967 1510 - - 1487 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 830 732 - 817 741 -------
Stage 1 909 814 - 917 820 -------
Stage 2 931 809 - 901 814 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.15 9.42 0 0.35

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1510 - - 888 828 1487 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.024 0.015 0.003 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.2 9.4 7.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 13
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 777
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1407 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 03 Existing Plus Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 49 0 0 0 57 90 0 0 89 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 49 0 0 0 57 90 0 0 89 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 52 0 0 0 61 96 0 0 95 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 319 319 102 312 326 96 109 0 0 96 0 0 Stage 1 102 102 - 217 217 -------
Stage 2 217 217 - 95 109 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 634 598 954 641 593 961 1482 - - 1498 - - Stage 1 904 811 - 785 723 -------
Stage 2 785 723 - 912 806 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 608 573 954 581 568 961 1482 - - 1498 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 696 642 - 673 631 -------
Stage 1 904 811 - 753 694 -------
Stage 2 753 694 - 862 806 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.19 0 2.92 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1482 - - 696 954 - 1498 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 - - 0.014 0.055 ----
H C M C t r l D l y ( s / v ) 7 . 5 - - 1 0 . 2900 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - BAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 14
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 778
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1408 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 03 Existing Plus Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 553 28 37 536 23 77 21 32 24 17 105 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 553 28 37 536 23 77 21 32 24 17 105 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 628 32 42 609 26 88 24 36 27 19 119 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 185 835 708 105 715 31 152 224 336 89 66 414 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1781 76 1781 675 1013 1781 223 1396 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 628 32 42 0 635 88 0 60 27 0 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1857 1781 0 1688 1781 0 1619 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.5 24.8 1.0 2.0 0.0 27.6 4.2 0.0 2.2 1.3 0.0 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.5 24.8 1.0 2.0 0.0 27.6 4.2 0.0 2.2 1.3 0.0 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.86
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 185 835 708 105 0 746 152 0 560 89 0 480 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.75 0.05 0.40 0.00 0.85 0.58 0.00 0.11 0.30 0.00 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 331 1379 1169 150 0 1181 271 0 560 150 0 480 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.2 20.5 13.9 40.3 0.0 24.2 39.1 0.0 20.6 40.7 0.0 24.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 1.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.6 3.5 0.0 0.4 1.9 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 9.9 0.3 0.9 0.0 11.5 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.6 21.9 13.9 42.8 0.0 27.8 42.6 0.0 20.9 42.6 0.0 25.5 LnGrp LOS D C B DC DC DC
Approach Vol, veh/h 776 677 148 165
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.5 28.7 33.8 28.3
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 32.0 7.7 42.2 10.1 28.9 11.7 38.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 4.2 4.0 26.8 6.2 7.8 7.5 29.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.3 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 27.3
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 15
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 779
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1409 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 03 Existing Plus Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 765 34 43 1357 12 27
Future Vol, veh/h 765 34 43 1357 12 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 860 38 48 1525 13 30
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 898 0 1738 449
Stage 1 - - - - 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - 859 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 752 - 78 557
Stage 1 - - - - 366 -
Stage 2 - - - - 375 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 752 - 73 557
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 250 -
Stage 1 - - - - 366 -
Stage 2 - - - - 351 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.31 14.98

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 404 - - 752 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 - - 0.064 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15 - - 10.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0.2 -
Appendix F - 16
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 780
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1410 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 04 Existing Plus Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 26 29 20 0 24 0 26 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 26 29 20 0 24 0 26 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 05 63 94 43 0 03 6 03 9 0 2 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 30 0 0 95 0 0 195 194 76 174 214 30 Stage 1 - ----- 7 6 7 6- 1 1 8 1 1 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 1 9 1 1 8- 5 6 9 5-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1582 - - 1498 - - 765 701 985 788 684 1044 Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 3 8 3 2- 8 8 6 7 9 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 8 5 7 9 8- 9 5 6 8 1 6-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1582 - - 1498 - - 740 680 985 734 664 1044 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 4 0 6 8 0- 7 3 4 6 6 4-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 3 8 3 2- 8 6 0 7 7 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 5 7 7 7 4- 9 1 8 8 1 6-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.42 9.65 10.44

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 850 1582 - - 1065 - - 664
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 - - - 0.029 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.6 0 - - 7.5 0 - 10.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
Appendix F - 17
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 781
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1411 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 04 Existing Plus Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 6 44 8 2 54
Future Vol, veh/h 13 6 44 8 2 54
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 6 46 8 2 57
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 112 51 0 0 55 0
Stage 1 51 -----
Stage 2 61 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 885 1018 - - 1550 -
Stage 1 972 -----
Stage 2 962 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 884 1018 - - 1550 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 844 -----
Stage 1 972 -----
Stage 2 960 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.13 0 0.26

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 892 1550 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.022 0.001 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.1 7.3 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
Appendix F - 18
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 782
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1412 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 04 Existing Plus Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 5 2 1 31 6 60 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 5 2 1 31 6 60 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 005 3 2044 5 5 1 41 6 90
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 135 148 69 142 142 62 69 0 0 68 0 0 Stage 1 72 72 - 70 70 -------
Stage 2 63 77 - 72 72 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 837 743 993 828 750 1003 1531 - - 1533 - - Stage 1 938 835 - 940 837 -------
Stage 2 948 831 - 938 835 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 830 741 993 821 747 1003 1531 - - 1533 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 857 760 - 850 763 -------
Stage 1 937 835 - 937 834 -------
Stage 2 941 829 - 933 835 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.64 9.34 0.43 0.11

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1531 - - 993 865 1533 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.005 0.041 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 - - 8.6 9.3 7.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
Appendix F - 19
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 783
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1413 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 04 Existing Plus Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 72 1 0 0 38 53 0 0 87 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 72 1 0 0 38 53 0 0 87 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 15 0 101 1 0 0 54 75 0 0 123 18
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 313 313 132 304 323 75 141 0 0 75 0 0 Stage 1 132 132 - 182 182 -------
Stage 2 182 182 - 123 141 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 639 602 918 648 595 987 1442 - - 1525 - - Stage 1 872 787 - 820 749 -------
Stage 2 820 749 - 882 780 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 615 580 918 555 573 987 1442 - - 1525 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 714 655 - 653 639 -------
Stage 1 872 787 - 790 721 -------
Stage 2 790 721 - 784 780 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.51 10.52 3.17 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1442 - - 714 918 653 1525 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - - 0.022 0.111 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 - - 10.2 9.4 10.5 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.4 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 20
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 784
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1414 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 04 Existing Plus Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 81 705 29 25 388 13 75 7 44 24 14 135 Future Volume (veh/h) 81 705 29 25 388 13 75 7 44 24 14 135 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 89 775 32 27 426 14 82 8 48 26 15 148 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 154 898 761 90 800 26 145 70 423 89 40 398
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1801 59 1781 231 1389 1781 148 1460 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 89 775 32 27 0 440 82 0 56 26 0 163 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1860 1781 0 1620 1781 0 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 32.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 15.0 3.9 0.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 7.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 32.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 15.0 3.9 0.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 7.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.91
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 898 761 90 0 827 145 0 493 89 0 438 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.86 0.04 0.30 0.00 0.53 0.56 0.00 0.11 0.29 0.00 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 256 1472 1247 153 0 1357 256 0 493 153 0 438 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.2 20.1 12.0 39.8 0.0 17.6 38.5 0.0 21.8 39.9 0.0 25.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 3.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.5 3.4 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.0 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 12.7 0.3 0.6 0.0 5.8 1.8 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.6 23.2 12.0 41.7 0.0 18.1 41.9 0.0 22.3 41.7 0.0 28.0 LnGrp LOS D C B D B D C D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 896 467 138 189
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 19.5 33.9 29.9
Approach LOS C B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 29.0 6.9 44.3 9.6 26.2 10.0 41.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 4.2 3.3 34.0 5.9 9.1 6.2 17.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 5.8 0.1 0.5 0.1 2.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 24.5
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 21
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 785
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1415 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 04 Existing Plus Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1172 11 22 939 24 27
Future Vol, veh/h 1172 11 22 939 24 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1234 12 23 988 25 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1245 0 1780 623
Stage 1 - - - - 1239 -
Stage 2 - - - - 541 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 555 - 73 429
Stage 1 - - - - 236 -
Stage 2 - - - - 548 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 555 - 70 429
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 210 -
Stage 1 - - - - 236 -
Stage 2 - - - - 525 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.27 20.34

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 288 - - 555 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.186 - - 0.042 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 20.3 - - 11.8 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0.1 -
Appendix F - 22
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 786
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1416 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 05 OY Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 50 27 46 1 56 0 22 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 50 27 46 1 56 0 22 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 65 12 84 7 15 7 02 2 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 48 0 0 77 0 0 153 154 51 128 179 47 Stage 1 - ----- 5 1 5 1- 1 0 3 1 0 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 0 2 1 0 3- 2 6 7 7-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1522 - - 814 738 1017 845 715 1022 Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 2 8 5 2- 9 0 3 8 1 0-
Stage 2 - ----- 9 0 4 8 1 0- 9 9 2 8 3 1-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1522 - - 799 724 1017 811 701 1022 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 9 9 7 2 4- 8 1 1 7 0 1-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 2 8 5 2- 8 8 7 7 9 5-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 8 7 7 9 5- 9 7 0 8 3 1-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 2.7 9.67 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 850 1559 - - 654 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 - - - 0.018 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.4 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - -
Appendix F - 23
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 787
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1417 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 05 OY Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 77 0
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 1090000 6 600 7 70
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 1 2090000 6 900 8 10
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 151 151 81 151 151 69 81 0 0 69 0 0 Stage 1 81 81 - 69 69 -------
Stage 2 69 69 - 81 81 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 817 741 979 817 741 993 1517 - - 1531 - - Stage 1 927 828 - 941 837 -------
Stage 2 941 837 - 927 828 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 817 741 979 809 741 993 1517 - - 1531 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 849 761 - 843 761 -------
Stage 1 927 828 - 941 837 -------
Stage 2 941 837 - 918 828 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.08 0 0 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1517 - - 903 - 1531 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.023 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.1 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 24
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 788
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1418 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 05 OY Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 50 0 0 0 59 57 0 0 73 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 50 0 0 0 59 57 0 0 73 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 53 0 0 0 63 61 0 0 78 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 271 271 85 264 278 61 91 0 0 61 0 0 Stage 1 85 85 - 186 186 -------
Stage 2 186 186 - 78 91 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 682 636 974 689 630 1005 1503 - - 1543 - - Stage 1 923 825 - 816 746 -------
Stage 2 816 746 - 931 819 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 653 609 974 624 604 1005 1503 - - 1543 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 726 664 - 702 654 -------
Stage 1 923 825 - 782 715 -------
Stage 2 782 715 - 880 819 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.08 0 3.81 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1503 - - 726 974 - 1543 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - 0.013 0.055 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 10 8.9 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 25
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 789
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1419 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 05 OY Without Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 78 570 29 38 552 20 79 15 33 24 15 93 Future Volume (veh/h) 78 570 29 38 552 20 79 15 33 24 15 93 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 89 648 33 43 627 23 90 17 38 27 17 106 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 154 818 693 107 736 27 155 174 388 90 67 420 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1793 66 1781 514 1149 1781 224 1395 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 89 648 33 43 0 650 90 0 55 27 0 123 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1859 1781 0 1663 1781 0 1619 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 26.1 1.0 2.0 0.0 27.7 4.2 0.0 2.0 1.3 0.0 5.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 26.1 1.0 2.0 0.0 27.7 4.2 0.0 2.0 1.3 0.0 5.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.69 1.00 0.86
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 818 693 107 0 763 155 0 562 90 0 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.79 0.05 0.40 0.00 0.85 0.58 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.00 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 1403 1189 153 0 1203 275 0 562 153 0 488 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.3 21.2 14.1 39.5 0.0 23.3 38.3 0.0 19.8 40.0 0.0 23.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 1.8 0.0 2.4 0.0 3.6 3.4 0.0 0.3 1.9 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 10.4 0.3 0.9 0.0 11.5 2.0 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.7 22.9 14.1 42.0 0.0 26.9 41.7 0.0 20.1 41.8 0.0 24.3 LnGrp LOS D C B DC DC DC
Approach Vol, veh/h 770 693 145 150
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.7 27.9 33.5 27.5
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 32.0 7.7 40.7 10.1 28.8 10.1 38.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 4.0 4.0 28.1 6.2 7.0 6.2 29.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 26.9
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 26
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 790
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1420 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 05 OY Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 788 25 44 1398 9 28
Future Vol, veh/h 788 25 44 1398 9 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 885 28 49 1571 10 31
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 913 0 1784 457
Stage 1 - - - - 899 -
Stage 2 - - - - 884 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 742 - 73 551
Stage 1 - - - - 357 -
Stage 2 - - - - 364 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 742 - 68 551
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 242 -
Stage 1 - - - - 357 -
Stage 2 - - - - 340 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.31 14.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 420 - - 742 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 - - 0.067 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.5 - - 10.2 -
HCM Lane LOS B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0.2 -
Appendix F - 27
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 791
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1421 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 06 OY Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 38 27 27 21 0 25 0 16 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 27 27 21 0 25 0 16 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 05 84 14 13 2 03 8 02 4 0 2 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 32 0 0 98 0 0 192 192 78 171 212 32 Stage 1 - ----- 7 8 7 8- 1 1 4 1 1 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 1 4 1 1 4- 5 8 9 8-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1580 - - 1495 - - 767 703 983 792 685 1042 Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 1 8 3 0- 8 9 1 8 0 1-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 9 0 8 0 1- 9 5 4 8 1 4-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1580 - - 1495 - - 744 684 983 751 666 1042 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 4 4 6 8 4- 7 5 1 6 6 6-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 1 8 3 0- 8 6 6 7 7 9-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 6 4 7 7 9- 9 3 1 8 1 4-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.21 9.74 10.42

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 822 1580 - - 1013 - - 666
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - - - 0.027 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.5 0 - 10.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
Appendix F - 28
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 792
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1422 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 06 OY Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 0050004 4 500 5 50
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 0050004 4 500 5 50
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 0050004 4 700 5 80
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 114 114 58 114 114 47 58 0 0 47 0 0 Stage 1 58 58 - 56 56 -------
Stage 2 56 56 - 58 58 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 863 776 1008 863 776 1022 1546 - - 1560 - - Stage 1 954 847 - 956 848 -------
Stage 2 956 848 - 954 847 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 861 774 1008 857 774 1022 1546 - - 1560 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 876 781 - 871 779 -------
Stage 1 954 847 - 954 846 -------
Stage 2 954 846 - 949 847 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.59 0 0.6 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1546 - - 1008 - 1560 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.005 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 - - 8.6 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 29
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 793
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1423 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 06 OY Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 74 1 0 0 39 34 0 0 46 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 74 1 0 0 39 34 0 0 46 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 15 0 104 1 0 0 55 48 0 0 65 18
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 232 232 74 223 241 48 83 0 0 48 0 0 Stage 1 74 74 - 158 158 -------
Stage 2 158 158 - 65 83 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 723 668 988 733 661 1021 1514 - - 1559 - - Stage 1 935 833 - 844 767 -------
Stage 2 844 767 - 946 826 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 697 644 988 632 637 1021 1514 - - 1559 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 757 689 - 707 677 -------
Stage 1 935 833 - 814 739 -------
Stage 2 814 739 - 846 826 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.18 10.1 3.99 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1514 - - 757 988 707 1559 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 - - 0.02 0.106 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 9.9 9.1 10.1 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - AABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.4 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 30
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 794
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1424 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 06 OY Without Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 65 726 30 26 400 12 77 5 45 21 8 106 Future Volume (veh/h) 65 726 30 26 400 12 77 5 45 21 8 106 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 798 33 29 440 13 85 5 49 23 9 116 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 131 919 779 91 848 25 148 44 435 83 30 389
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.49 0.49 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1807 53 1781 149 1459 1781 115 1487 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 798 33 29 0 453 85 0 54 23 0 125 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1861 1781 0 1608 1781 0 1603 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 33.7 1.0 1.4 0.0 15.2 4.1 0.0 2.2 1.1 0.0 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 33.7 1.0 1.4 0.0 15.2 4.1 0.0 2.2 1.1 0.0 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.93
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 131 919 779 91 0 873 148 0 479 83 0 420 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.87 0.04 0.32 0.00 0.52 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.28 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 250 1441 1221 150 0 1329 250 0 479 150 0 420 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.8 20.1 11.7 40.7 0.0 16.6 39.2 0.0 22.7 40.9 0.0 26.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.5 3.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 13.5 0.3 0.6 0.0 5.8 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.0 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.2 23.7 11.8 42.6 0.0 17.0 42.7 0.0 23.1 42.7 0.0 28.1 LnGrp LOS D C B D B D C D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 902 482 139 148
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.8 18.6 35.1 30.3
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 29.0 7.1 46.2 9.9 25.8 9.0 44.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 4.2 3.4 35.7 6.1 7.6 5.4 17.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 6.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 24.4
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 31
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 795
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1425 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 06 OY Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1207 8 23 967 14 28
Future Vol, veh/h 1207 8 23 967 14 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1271 8 24 1018 15 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1279 0 1832 639
Stage 1 - - - - 1275 -
Stage 2 - - - - 557 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 539 - 68 418
Stage 1 - - - - 226 -
Stage 2 - - - - 537 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 539 - 65 418
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 201 -
Stage 1 - - - - 226 -
Stage 2 - - - - 513 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.28 18.65

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 308 - - 539 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 - - 0.045 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 18.6 - - 12 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0.1 -
Appendix F - 32
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 796
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1426 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 07 OY With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 50 37 46 1 56 0 25 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 50 37 46 1 56 0 25 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 65 13 84 7 15 7 02 6 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 48 0 0 77 0 0 173 174 51 148 199 47 Stage 1 - ----- 5 1 5 1- 1 2 3 1 2 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 2 2 1 2 3- 2 6 7 7-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1522 - - 789 719 1017 820 696 1022 Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 2 8 5 2- 8 8 1 7 9 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 8 2 7 9 4- 9 9 2 8 3 1-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1522 - - 769 701 1017 779 679 1022 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 6 9 7 0 1- 7 7 9 6 7 9-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 6 2 8 5 2- 8 5 9 7 7 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 5 9 7 7 3- 9 6 7 8 3 1-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.27 9.8 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 832 1559 - - 789 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 - - - 0.025 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 0 - - 7.4 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - -
Appendix F - 33
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 797
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1427 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 07 OY With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 78 9 6 81
Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 78 9 6 81
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
M v m t F l o w 72 8 296 8 5
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 185 87 0 0 92 0
Stage 1 87 -----
Stage 2 98 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 805 972 - - 1503 -
Stage 1 937 -----
Stage 2 926 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 801 972 - - 1503 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 790 -----
Stage 1 937 -----
Stage 2 922 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.42 0 0.51

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 824 1503 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.011 0.004 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.4 7.4 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
Appendix F - 34
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 798
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1428 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 07 OY With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 7 5 2 64 8 40 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 7 5 2 64 8 40 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 1 209 1 2010 7 9 2 74 8 80
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 176 203 88 189 189 93 88 0 0 106 0 0 Stage 1 97 97 - 93 93 -------
Stage 2 79 106 - 97 97 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 787 693 970 771 705 965 1507 - - 1485 - - Stage 1 910 815 - 914 818 -------
Stage 2 930 807 - 910 815 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 784 691 970 761 703 965 1507 - - 1485 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 827 730 - 814 738 -------
Stage 1 907 813 - 914 818 -------
Stage 2 929 807 - 898 813 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.16 9.43 0 0.34

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1507 - - 886 825 1485 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.024 0.015 0.003 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.2 9.4 7.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 35
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 799
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1429 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 07 OY With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 50 0 0 0 59 92 0 0 91 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 50 0 0 0 59 92 0 0 91 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 10 0 53 0 0 0 63 98 0 0 97 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 327 327 104 320 334 98 111 0 0 98 0 0 Stage 1 104 104 - 223 223 -------
Stage 2 223 223 - 97 111 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 626 591 951 633 586 958 1479 - - 1495 - - Stage 1 902 809 - 779 719 -------
Stage 2 779 719 - 910 804 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 599 566 951 572 561 958 1479 - - 1495 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 689 637 - 666 626 -------
Stage 1 902 809 - 746 688 -------
Stage 2 746 688 - 859 804 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.21 0 2.95 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1479 - - 689 951 - 1495 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - 0.014 0.056 ----
H C M C t r l D l y ( s / v ) 7 . 5 - - 1 0 . 3900 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - BAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 36
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 800
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1430 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 07 OY With Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 570 29 38 552 24 79 21 33 25 17 108 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 570 29 38 552 24 79 21 33 25 17 108 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 118 648 33 43 627 27 90 24 38 28 19 123 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 186 854 724 104 730 31 153 212 335 89 63 405 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1780 77 1781 652 1032 1781 217 1402 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 118 648 33 43 0 654 90 0 62 28 0 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1857 1781 0 1685 1781 0 1618 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.8 26.2 1.0 2.1 0.0 29.1 4.4 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 6.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 26.2 1.0 2.1 0.0 29.1 4.4 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 6.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.87
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 854 724 104 0 762 153 0 547 89 0 467 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.76 0.05 0.41 0.00 0.86 0.59 0.00 0.11 0.31 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 324 1349 1144 147 0 1155 265 0 547 147 0 467 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.0 20.5 13.7 41.2 0.0 24.4 39.9 0.0 21.5 41.6 0.0 25.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.5 1.4 0.0 2.6 0.0 4.3 3.5 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 10.4 0.3 1.0 0.0 12.3 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 42.5 21.9 13.7 43.8 0.0 28.6 43.5 0.0 21.9 43.6 0.0 26.8 LnGrp LOS D C B DC DC DC
Approach Vol, veh/h 799 697 152 170
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 29.6 34.7 29.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.0 32.0 7.8 43.9 10.3 28.7 12.0 39.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 4.3 4.1 28.2 6.4 8.2 7.8 31.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 27.8
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 37
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 801
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1431 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 07 OY With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 788 35 44 1398 12 28
Future Vol, veh/h 788 35 44 1398 12 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 885 39 49 1571 13 31
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 925 0 1789 462
Stage 1 - - - - 905 -
Stage 2 - - - - 884 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 735 - 72 546
Stage 1 - - - - 355 -
Stage 2 - - - - 364 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 735 - 67 546
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 241 -
Stage 1 - - - - 355 -
Stage 2 - - - - 339 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.31 15.26

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 396 - - 735 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 - - 0.067 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.3 - - 10.3 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0.2 -
Appendix F - 38
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 802
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1432 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 08 OY With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 38 27 30 21 0 25 0 26 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 27 30 21 0 25 0 26 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 05 84 14 53 2 03 8 03 9 0 2 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 32 0 0 98 0 0 202 201 78 180 221 32 Stage 1 - ----- 7 8 7 8- 1 2 3 1 2 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 2 3 1 2 3- 5 8 9 8-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1580 - - 1495 - - 757 695 983 781 677 1042 Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 1 8 3 0- 8 8 1 7 9 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 8 1 7 9 4- 9 5 4 8 1 4-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1580 - - 1495 - - 732 674 983 727 656 1042 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 7 3 2 6 7 4- 7 2 7 6 5 6-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 3 1 8 3 0- 8 5 4 7 7 0-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 5 2 7 7 0- 9 1 6 8 1 4-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.4 9.71 10.5

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 841 1580 - - 1059 - - 656
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.092 - - - 0.03 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.5 0 - 10.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0
Appendix F - 39
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 803
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1433 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 08 OY With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 6 45 8 2 56
Future Vol, veh/h 13 6 45 8 2 56
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 6 47 8 2 59
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 115 52 0 0 56 0
Stage 1 52 -----
Stage 2 63 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 882 1016 - - 1549 -
Stage 1 971 -----
Stage 2 959 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 880 1016 - - 1549 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 842 -----
Stage 1 971 -----
Stage 2 958 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.14 0 0.25

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 890 1549 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.022 0.001 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.1 7.3 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
Appendix F - 40
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 804
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1434 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 08 OY With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 5 3 1 31 6 80 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 5 3 1 31 6 80 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 005 3 2044 5 6 1 41 7 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 138 152 72 145 145 63 72 0 0 69 0 0 Stage 1 74 74 - 71 71 -------
Stage 2 64 78 - 74 74 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 833 740 991 824 747 1002 1529 - - 1531 - - Stage 1 936 834 - 939 836 -------
Stage 2 947 830 - 936 834 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 826 738 991 817 744 1002 1529 - - 1531 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 854 758 - 847 761 -------
Stage 1 935 833 - 936 833 -------
Stage 2 940 828 - 930 833 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.65 9.35 0.42 0.11

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1529 - - 991 863 1531 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.005 0.041 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 - - 8.7 9.4 7.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
Appendix F - 41
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 805
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1435 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 08 OY With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 74 1 0 0 39 54 0 0 88 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 74 1 0 0 39 54 0 0 88 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 15 0 104 1 0 0 55 76 0 0 124 18
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 319 319 133 310 328 76 142 0 0 76 0 0 Stage 1 133 133 - 186 186 -------
Stage 2 186 186 - 124 142 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 634 598 916 643 591 985 1441 - - 1523 - - Stage 1 870 786 - 816 746 -------
Stage 2 816 746 - 880 779 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 610 575 916 548 568 985 1441 - - 1523 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 709 652 - 647 636 -------
Stage 1 870 786 - 785 718 -------
Stage 2 785 718 - 780 779 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.53 10.57 3.19 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1441 - - 709 916 647 1523 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - 0.022 0.114 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 - - 10.2 9.4 10.6 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.4 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 42
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 806
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1436 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 08 OY With Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 726 30 26 400 13 77 7 45 25 14 138 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 726 30 26 400 13 77 7 45 25 14 138 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 798 33 29 440 14 85 8 49 27 15 152 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 155 918 778 91 820 26 148 67 413 89 38 385
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.49 0.49 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1803 57 1781 227 1392 1781 144 1463 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 91 798 33 29 0 454 85 0 57 27 0 167 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1860 1781 0 1620 1781 0 1607 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 33.9 1.0 1.4 0.0 15.7 4.1 0.0 2.3 1.3 0.0 7.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 33.9 1.0 1.4 0.0 15.7 4.1 0.0 2.3 1.3 0.0 7.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.91
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 155 918 778 91 0 846 148 0 480 89 0 423 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.87 0.04 0.32 0.00 0.54 0.57 0.00 0.12 0.30 0.00 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 249 1433 1215 149 0 1321 249 0 480 149 0 423 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.3 20.2 11.8 40.9 0.0 17.6 39.5 0.0 22.9 41.0 0.0 27.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.5 3.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.9 0.0 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 13.6 0.3 0.6 0.0 6.1 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 3.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 42.8 23.9 11.9 42.9 0.0 18.1 43.0 0.0 23.4 42.9 0.0 29.8 LnGrp LOS D C B D B D C D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 922 483 142 194
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 19.6 35.1 31.6
Approach LOS C B D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.9 29.0 7.1 46.4 9.9 26.0 10.3 43.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 4.3 3.4 35.9 6.1 9.6 6.4 17.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 6.0 0.1 0.5 0.1 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.3
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 43
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 807
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1437 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 08 OY With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1207 11 23 967 24 28
Future Vol, veh/h 1207 11 23 967 24 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1271 12 24 1018 25 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1282 0 1834 641
Stage 1 - - - - 1276 -
Stage 2 - - - - 557 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 537 - 68 417
Stage 1 - - - - 226 -
Stage 2 - - - - 537 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 537 - 64 417
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 201 -
Stage 1 - - - - 226 -
Stage 2 - - - - 513 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.28 21.04

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 279 - - 537 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - - 0.045 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 21 - - 12 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0.1 -
Appendix F - 44
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 808
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1438 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 62 70 46 1 66 0 63 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 62 70 46 1 66 0 63 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 66 37 14 7 16 7 06 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 48 0 0 89 0 0 247 248 57 216 279 47 Stage 1 - ----- 5 7 5 7- 1 9 0 1 9 0-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 9 0 1 9 1- 2 6 8 9-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1507 - - 707 655 1009 741 629 1022 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 5 8 4 7- 8 1 1 7 4 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 1 2 7 4 2- 9 9 2 8 2 1-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1507 - - 672 623 1009 660 598 1022 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 6 7 2 6 2 3- 6 6 0 5 9 8-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 5 8 4 7- 7 7 2 7 0 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 7 2 7 0 6- 9 2 9 8 2 1-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.49 10.36 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 803 1559 - - 1072 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 - - - 0.047 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.4 0 - - 7.5 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.1 - - -
Appendix F - 45
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 809
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1439 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 128 0 0 131
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 128 0 0 131
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 135 0 0 138
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 273 135 0 0 135 0
Stage 1 135 -----
Stage 2 138 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 717 914 - - 1450 -
Stage 1 892 -----
Stage 2 889 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 717 914 - - 1450 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 733 -----
Stage 1 892 -----
Stage 2 889 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1450 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 -
Appendix F - 46
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 810
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1440 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 131 0
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 131 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 138 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 261 261 138 261 261 123 138 0 0 123 0 0 Stage 1 138 138 - 123 123 -------
Stage 2 123 123 - 138 138 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 692 644 910 692 644 928 1446 - - 1464 - - Stage 1 865 782 - 881 794 -------
Stage 2 881 794 - 865 782 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 692 644 910 685 644 928 1446 - - 1464 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 771 702 - 765 702 -------
Stage 1 865 782 - 881 794 -------
Stage 2 881 794 - 856 782 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.46 0 0 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1446 - - 828 - 1464 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.025 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.5 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 47
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 811
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1441 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 64 0 0 0 71 108 0 0 127 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 64 0 0 0 71 108 0 0 127 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 9 0 67 0 0 0 75 114 0 0 134 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 404 404 141 397 411 114 147 0 0 114 0 0 Stage 1 141 141 - 263 263 -------
Stage 2 263 263 - 134 147 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 557 536 907 563 531 939 1434 - - 1476 - - Stage 1 862 780 - 742 691 -------
Stage 2 742 691 - 870 775 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 528 508 907 494 503 939 1434 - - 1476 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 642 599 - 609 585 -------
Stage 1 862 780 - 703 655 -------
Stage 2 703 655 - 805 775 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.46 0 3.03 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1434 - - 642 907 - 1476 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - - 0.015 0.074 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 - - 10.7 9.3 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 48
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 812
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1442 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 167 1125 162 101 968 80 192 67 72 78 83 184 Future Volume (veh/h) 167 1125 162 101 968 80 192 67 72 78 83 184 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 176 1184 171 106 1019 84 202 71 76 82 87 194 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 230 1021 865 111 817 67 200 203 217 111 101 225 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1705 141 1781 826 885 1781 515 1149 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 176 1184 171 106 0 1103 202 0 147 82 0 281 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1845 1781 0 1711 1781 0 1664 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 65.5 6.6 7.1 0.0 57.5 13.5 0.0 8.5 5.4 0.0 19.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 65.5 6.6 7.1 0.0 57.5 13.5 0.0 8.5 5.4 0.0 19.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.69
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 230 1021 865 111 0 885 200 0 421 111 0 326 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 1.16 0.20 0.95 0.00 1.25 1.01 0.00 0.35 0.74 0.00 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 885 200 0 421 111 0 326 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.5 27.3 13.9 56.1 0.0 31.2 53.2 0.0 37.3 55.3 0.0 46.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.8 83.0 0.1 70.0 0.0 120.6 65.7 0.0 2.3 22.3 0.0 24.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 49.5 2.2 5.3 0.0 53.1 9.7 0.0 3.8 3.1 0.0 10.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 63.3 110.2 14.0 126.1 0.0 151.8 118.9 0.0 39.6 77.6 0.0 71.4 LnGrp LOS E F B F F F D E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1531 1209 349 363
Approach Delay, s/veh 94.1 149.6 85.5 72.8
Approach LOS F F F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.0 10.0 68.0 16.0 26.0 18.0 60.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 10.5 9.1 67.5 15.5 21.6 13.5 59.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 110.4
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 49
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 813
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1443 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 09 OY Cumul Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 908 46 65 1524 29 48
Future Vol, veh/h 908 46 65 1524 29 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 956 48 68 1604 31 51
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1004 0 1919 502
Stage 1 - - - - 980 -
Stage 2 - - - - 939 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 685 - 59 515
Stage 1 - - - - 324 -
Stage 2 - - - - 341 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 685 - 53 515
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 216 -
Stage 1 - - - - 324 -
Stage 2 - - - - 307 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.44 18.94

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 339 - - 685 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.239 - - 0.1 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 18.9 - - 10.8 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - - 0.3 -
Appendix F - 50
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 814
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1444 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 38 41 73 21 0 39 0 62 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 41 73 21 0 39 0 62 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 04 04 37 72 2 04 1 06 5 0 1 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 22 0 0 83 0 0 238 237 62 216 259 22 Stage 1 - ----- 6 2 6 2- 1 7 6 1 7 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 7 6 1 7 6- 4 0 8 3-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1593 - - 1514 - - 716 664 1003 741 645 1055 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 0 8 4 4- 8 2 6 7 5 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 2 5 7 5 4- 9 7 5 8 2 6-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1593 - - 1514 - - 679 629 1003 657 612 1055 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 6 7 9 6 2 9- 6 5 7 6 1 2-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 0 8 4 4- 7 8 4 7 1 5-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 8 2 7 1 5- 9 1 1 8 2 6-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 5.83 9.86 10.89

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 847 1593 - - 1398 - - 612
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.126 - - - 0.051 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 0 - - 7.5 0 - 10.9
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.2 - - 0
Appendix F - 51
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 815
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1445 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 101 0 0 115
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 101 0 0 115
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 106 0 0 121
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 227 106 0 0 106 0
Stage 1 106 -----
Stage 2 121 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 761 948 - - 1485 -
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 904 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 761 948 - - 1485 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 763 -----
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 904 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1485 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 -
Appendix F - 52
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 816
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1446 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 105 0 0 115 0
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 0050004 1 0 500 1 1 50
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 111 0 0 121 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 240 240 121 240 240 111 121 0 0 111 0 0 Stage 1 121 121 - 119 119 -------
Stage 2 119 119 - 121 121 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 714 661 930 714 661 943 1466 - - 1479 - - Stage 1 883 796 - 885 797 -------
Stage 2 885 797 - 883 796 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 712 659 930 708 659 943 1466 - - 1479 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 784 712 - 780 710 -------
Stage 1 883 796 - 883 795 -------
Stage 2 883 795 - 878 796 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.89 0 0.27 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1466 - - 930 - 1479 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.006 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 8.9 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 53
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 817
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1447 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 95 1 0 0 60 94 0 0 106 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 95 1 0 0 60 94 0 0 106 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 100 1 0 0 63 99 0 0 112 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 344 344 118 337 351 99 125 0 0 99 0 0 Stage 1 118 118 - 225 225 -------
Stage 2 225 225 - 112 125 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 611 579 933 617 574 957 1461 - - 1494 - - Stage 1 886 798 - 777 717 -------
Stage 2 777 717 - 893 792 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 584 554 933 527 549 957 1461 - - 1494 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 682 631 - 634 619 -------
Stage 1 886 798 - 744 686 -------
Stage 2 744 686 - 798 792 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.43 10.68 2.95 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1461 - - 682 933 634 1494 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 - - 0.017 0.107 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 - - 10.4 9.3 10.7 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.4 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 54
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 818
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1448 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 144 1118 274 222 958 71 342 86 254 84 98 187 Future Volume (veh/h) 144 1118 274 222 958 71 342 86 254 84 98 187 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 152 1177 288 234 1008 75 360 91 267 88 103 197 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 186 1068 905 111 910 68 186 93 272 111 103 197 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1719 128 1781 419 1230 1781 574 1098 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 152 1177 288 234 0 1083 360 0 358 88 0 300 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1847 1781 0 1649 1781 0 1673 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 68.5 11.4 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 25.9 5.8 0.0 21.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 68.5 11.4 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 25.9 5.8 0.0 21.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.66
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 978 186 0 364 111 0 300 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 1.10 0.32 2.10 0.00 1.11 1.94 0.00 0.98 0.79 0.00 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 978 186 0 364 111 0 300 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.6 25.8 13.5 56.3 0.0 28.3 53.7 0.0 46.5 55.5 0.0 49.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 24.3 60.0 0.2 525.0 0.0 63.1 442.2 0.0 43.1 30.9 0.0 52.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 44.5 3.8 19.5 0.0 42.3 28.4 0.0 14.9 3.5 0.0 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 76.9 85.8 13.7 581.2 0.0 91.3 496.0 0.0 89.6 86.3 0.0 101.5 LnGrp LOS E F B FF FF FF
Approach Vol, veh/h 1617 1317 718 388
Approach Delay, s/veh 72.1 178.4 293.4 98.1
Approach LOS E F F F
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 29.0 10.0 71.0 15.0 24.0 15.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.8 27.9 9.5 70.5 14.5 23.5 12.0 65.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 148.6
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 55
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 819
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1449 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 10 OY Cumul Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1337 30 45 1105 37 51
Future Vol, veh/h 1337 30 45 1105 37 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1407 32 47 1163 39 54
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1439 0 2099 719
Stage 1 - - - - 1423 -
Stage 2 - - - - 676 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 468 - 45 371
Stage 1 - - - - 188 -
Stage 2 - - - - 467 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 468 - 40 371
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 165 -
Stage 1 - - - - 188 -
Stage 2 - - - - 419 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.53 28.66

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 243 - - 468 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.381 - - 0.101 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 28.7 - - 13.6 -
HCM Lane LOS D - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 - - 0.3 -
Appendix F - 56
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 820
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1450 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 62 80 46 1 66 0 66 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 62 80 46 1 66 0 66 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 02 66 38 24 7 16 7 06 7 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 48 0 0 89 0 0 267 268 57 236 299 47 Stage 1 - ----- 5 7 5 7- 2 1 1 2 1 1-
Stage 2 - ----- 2 1 0 2 1 1- 2 6 8 9-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1507 - - 685 638 1009 718 613 1022 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 5 8 4 7- 7 9 1 7 2 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 9 2 7 2 7- 9 9 2 8 2 1-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 - - 1507 - - 647 602 1009 633 579 1022 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 6 4 7 6 0 2- 6 3 3 5 7 9-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 5 8 4 7- 7 4 7 6 8 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 4 8 6 8 7- 9 2 6 8 2 1-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.74 10.5 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 789 1559 - - 1129 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.171 - - - 0.054 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.5 0 - - 7.5 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.2 - - -
Appendix F - 57
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 821
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1451 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 129 9 6 135
Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 129 9 6 135
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 2 136 9 6 142
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 295 141 0 0 145 0
Stage 1 141 -----
Stage 2 155 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 696 907 - - 1437 -
Stage 1 886 -----
Stage 2 873 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 693 907 - - 1437 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 717 -----
Stage 1 886 -----
Stage 2 870 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.85 0 0.32

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 752 1437 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.013 0.004 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.8 7.5 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
Appendix F - 58
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 822
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1452 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 1 2 6 2 64 1 3 80 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 109 1 1010 1 2 6 2 64 1 3 80 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 1 209 1 2010 1 3 3 2 74 1 4 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 286 314 145 300 300 146 145 0 0 160 0 0 Stage 1 154 154 - 146 146 -------
Stage 2 133 160 - 154 154 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 666 602 902 652 612 901 1437 - - 1419 - - Stage 1 849 770 - 856 776 -------
Stage 2 871 766 - 849 770 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 663 600 902 644 611 901 1437 - - 1419 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 751 674 - 739 682 -------
Stage 1 846 768 - 856 776 -------
Stage 2 870 766 - 837 768 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.55 9.88 0 0.21

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1437 - - 812 750 1419 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.026 0.017 0.003 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.6 9.9 7.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
Appendix F - 59
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 823
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1453 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 64 0 0 0 71 143 0 0 145 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 64 0 0 0 71 143 0 0 145 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 9 0 67 0 0 0 75 151 0 0 153 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 459 459 159 453 466 151 166 0 0 151 0 0 Stage 1 159 159 - 300 300 -------
Stage 2 300 300 - 153 166 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 512 498 886 517 494 896 1412 - - 1431 - - Stage 1 843 766 - 709 666 -------
Stage 2 709 666 - 850 761 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 485 472 886 453 468 896 1412 - - 1431 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 610 574 - 579 561 -------
Stage 1 843 766 - 671 630 -------
Stage 2 671 630 - 785 761 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.6 0 2.55 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1412 - - 610 886 - 1431 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 - - 0.016 0.076 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 - - 11 9.4 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BAAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 0.2 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 60
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 824
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1454 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 193 1125 162 101 968 84 192 73 72 79 85 199 Future Volume (veh/h) 193 1125 162 101 968 84 192 73 72 79 85 199 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 203 1184 171 106 1019 88 202 77 76 83 89 209 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 245 1021 865 111 799 69 200 212 210 111 97 228 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1697 147 1781 864 853 1781 496 1165 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 203 1184 171 106 0 1107 202 0 153 83 0 298 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1844 1781 0 1717 1781 0 1661 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 65.5 6.6 7.1 0.0 56.5 13.5 0.0 8.9 5.5 0.0 21.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 65.5 6.6 7.1 0.0 56.5 13.5 0.0 8.9 5.5 0.0 21.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.70
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 868 200 0 422 111 0 325 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 1.16 0.20 0.95 0.00 1.28 1.01 0.00 0.36 0.75 0.00 0.92 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 868 200 0 422 111 0 325 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.4 27.3 13.9 56.1 0.0 31.8 53.2 0.0 37.5 55.3 0.0 47.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.5 83.0 0.1 70.0 0.0 132.7 65.7 0.0 2.4 23.6 0.0 32.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.2 49.5 2.2 5.3 0.0 55.1 9.7 0.0 4.0 3.1 0.0 11.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 70.9 110.2 14.0 126.1 0.0 164.5 118.9 0.0 39.9 78.9 0.0 79.8 LnGrp LOS E F B F F F D E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1558 1213 355 381
Approach Delay, s/veh 94.5 161.1 84.8 79.6
Approach LOS F F F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.0 10.0 68.0 16.0 26.0 19.0 59.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 10.9 9.1 67.5 15.5 23.1 15.3 58.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 115.0
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 61
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 825
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1455 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 908 56 65 1524 32 48
Future Vol, veh/h 908 56 65 1524 32 48
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 956 59 68 1604 34 51
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1015 0 1924 507
Stage 1 - - - - 985 -
Stage 2 - - - - 939 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 679 - 59 511
Stage 1 - - - - 322 -
Stage 2 - - - - 341 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 679 - 53 511
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 215 -
Stage 1 - - - - 322 -
Stage 2 - - - - 306 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.45 19.62

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 330 - - 679 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.255 - - 0.101 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.6 - - 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 0.3 -
Appendix F - 62
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 826
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1456 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 38 41 76 21 0 39 0 72 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 41 76 21 0 39 0 72 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 04 04 38 02 2 04 1 07 6 0 1 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 22 0 0 83 0 0 244 244 62 222 265 22 Stage 1 - ----- 6 2 6 2- 1 8 2 1 8 2-
Stage 2 - ----- 1 8 3 1 8 2- 4 0 8 3-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1593 - - 1514 - - 710 658 1003 734 640 1055 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 0 8 4 4- 8 2 0 7 4 9-
Stage 2 - ----- 8 1 9 7 4 9- 9 7 5 8 2 6-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1593 - - 1514 - - 671 623 1003 642 606 1055 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 6 7 1 6 2 3- 6 4 2 6 0 6-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 0 8 4 4- 7 7 6 7 0 9-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 7 4 7 0 9- 9 0 1 8 2 6-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 5.88 9.88 10.95

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 854 1593 - - 1410 - - 606
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 - - - 0.053 - - 0.002
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 0 - - 7.5 0 - 11
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.2 - - 0
Appendix F - 63
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 827
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1457 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 6 105 8 2 116
Future Vol, veh/h 13 6 105 8 2 116
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 6 111 8 2 122
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 241 115 0 0 119 0
Stage 1 115 -----
Stage 2 126 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 747 938 - - 1469 -
Stage 1 910 -----
Stage 2 899 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 746 938 - - 1469 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 753 -----
Stage 1 910 -----
Stage 2 898 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.6 0 0.13

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 803 1469 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.025 0.001 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.6 7.5 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
Appendix F - 64
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 828
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1458 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 1 1 3 1 31 1 2 80 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 1 1 3 1 31 1 2 80 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 005 3 2044 1 1 9 1 41 1 3 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 264 278 135 271 271 126 135 0 0 133 0 0 Stage 1 137 137 - 134 134 -------
Stage 2 127 141 - 137 137 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 689 630 914 681 636 925 1450 - - 1452 - - Stage 1 866 783 - 869 785 -------
Stage 2 876 780 - 866 783 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 683 628 914 675 633 925 1450 - - 1452 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 765 692 - 759 694 -------
Stage 1 866 783 - 867 783 -------
Stage 2 870 778 - 861 783 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.96 9.87 0.23 0.06

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1450 - - 914 775 1452 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.006 0.046 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.5 - - 9 9.9 7.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
Appendix F - 65
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 829
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1459 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 95 1 0 0 60 114 0 0 148 13
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 95 1 0 0 60 114 0 0 148 13
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 100 1 0 0 63 120 0 0 156 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 409 409 163 402 416 120 169 0 0 120 0 0 Stage 1 163 163 - 246 246 -------
Stage 2 246 246 - 156 169 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 553 532 882 559 527 931 1408 - - 1468 - - Stage 1 839 764 - 757 702 -------
Stage 2 757 702 - 846 758 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 528 508 882 473 504 931 1408 - - 1468 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 651 606 - 595 591 -------
Stage 1 839 764 - 724 671 -------
Stage 2 724 671 - 751 758 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.71 11.06 2.65 0

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1408 - - 651 882 595 1468 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 - - 0.018 0.113 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 - - 10.6 9.6 11.1 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BABA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.4 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 66
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 830
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1460 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 162 1118 274 222 958 72 342 88 254 88 104 219 Future Volume (veh/h) 162 1118 274 222 958 72 342 88 254 88 104 219 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 171 1177 288 234 1008 76 360 93 267 93 109 231 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 186 1068 905 111 909 69 186 94 270 111 96 203 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1718 129 1781 426 1224 1781 534 1132 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 171 1177 288 234 0 1084 360 0 360 93 0 340 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1847 1781 0 1650 1781 0 1667 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.4 68.5 11.4 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.1 6.2 0.0 21.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.4 68.5 11.4 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.1 6.2 0.0 21.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.68
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 977 186 0 364 111 0 299 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 1.10 0.32 2.10 0.00 1.11 1.94 0.00 0.99 0.84 0.00 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 977 186 0 364 111 0 299 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.3 25.8 13.5 56.3 0.0 28.3 53.7 0.0 46.6 55.6 0.0 49.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 44.3 60.0 0.2 525.0 0.0 63.5 442.2 0.0 44.2 39.6 0.0 94.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.3 44.5 3.8 19.5 0.0 42.4 28.4 0.0 15.1 3.9 0.0 16.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 97.6 85.8 13.7 581.2 0.0 91.8 496.0 0.0 90.8 95.3 0.0 144.2 LnGrp LOS F F B FF FF FF
Approach Vol, veh/h 1636 1318 720 433
Approach Delay, s/veh 74.3 178.7 293.4 133.7
Approach LOS E F F F
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 29.0 10.0 71.0 15.0 24.0 15.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 28.1 9.5 70.5 14.5 23.5 13.4 65.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 152.5
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 67
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 831
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1461 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1337 33 45 1105 47 51
Future Vol, veh/h 1337 33 45 1105 47 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1407 35 47 1163 49 54
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1442 0 2101 721
Stage 1 - - - - 1425 -
Stage 2 - - - - 676 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 466 - ~ 44 370
Stage 1 - - - - 188 -
Stage 2 - - - - 467 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 466 - ~ 40 370
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 164 -
Stage 1 - - - - 188 -
Stage 2 - - - - 419 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.53 32.52

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 231 - - 466 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.446 - - 0.102 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 32.5 - - 13.6 -
HCM Lane LOS D - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 - - 0.3 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Appendix F - 68
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 832
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1462 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 13 20 50 Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 65 254 48 1 69 0 266 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 65 254 48 1 69 0 266 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 27 66 259 49 1 70 0 271 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 50 0 0 93 0 0 627 628 60 594 661 49 Stage 1 - ----- 6 0 6 0- 5 6 8 5 6 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 6 7 5 6 8- 2 7 9 3-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1502 - - 396 400 1006 416 383 1019 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 2 8 4 5- 5 0 8 5 0 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 0 8 5 0 6- 9 9 1 8 1 8-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1502 - - 326 329 1006 250 315 1019 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 3 2 6 3 2 9- 2 5 0 3 1 5-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 2 8 4 5- 4 1 8 4 1 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 4 1 8 4 1 6- 7 2 4 8 1 8-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 6.62 14.86 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 703 1557 - - 1460 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.486 - - - 0.173 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.9 0 - - 7.9 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0 - - 0.6 - - -
Appendix F - 69
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 833
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1463 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 13 20 50 Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 335 0 0 319
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 335 0 0 319
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 353 0 0 336
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 688 353 0 0 353 0
Stage 1 353 -----
Stage 2 336 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 412 691 - - 1206 -
Stage 1 711 -----
Stage 2 724 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 412 691 - - 1206 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 515 -----
Stage 1 711 -----
Stage 2 724 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1206 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 -
Appendix F - 70
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 834
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1464 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 13 20 50 Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 292 0 0 288 0
Future Vol, veh/h 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 292 0 0 288 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 307 0 0 303 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 611 611 303 611 611 307 303 0 0 307 0 0 Stage 1 303 303 - 307 307 -------
Stage 2 307 307 - 303 303 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 409 737 406 409 733 1258 - - 1253 - - Stage 1 706 663 - 703 661 -------
Stage 2 703 661 - 706 663 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 406 409 737 401 409 733 1258 - - 1253 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 574 548 - 570 548 -------
Stage 1 706 663 - 703 661 -------
Stage 2 703 661 - 697 663 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.88 0 0 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1258 - - 634 - 1253 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.035 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 10.9 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 71
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 835
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1465 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 13 20 50 Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 67 0 0 0 75 281 0 0 275 14
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 67 0 0 0 75 281 0 0 275 14
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 71 0 0 0 79 296 0 0 289 15
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 751 751 297 743 758 296 304 0 0 296 0 0 Stage 1 297 297 - 454 454 -------
Stage 2 454 454 - 289 304 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 327 340 743 331 336 744 1257 - - 1266 - - Stage 1 712 668 - 586 570 -------
Stage 2 586 570 - 718 663 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 307 318 743 281 315 744 1257 - - 1266 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 479 468 - 443 451 -------
Stage 1 712 668 - 549 534 -------
Stage 2 549 534 - 650 663 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.69 0 1.7 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1257 - - 479 743 - 1266 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 - - 0.024 0.095 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.1 - - 12.7 10.4 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BBAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 0.3 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 72
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 836
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1466 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 13 2050 Without Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 175 1181 170 106 1016 84 202 70 76 82 87 193 Future Volume (veh/h) 175 1181 170 106 1016 84 202 70 76 82 87 193 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 184 1243 179 112 1069 88 213 74 80 86 92 203 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 237 1021 865 111 810 67 200 202 218 111 102 224 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1705 140 1781 822 889 1781 519 1145 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 184 1243 179 112 0 1157 213 0 154 86 0 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1845 1781 0 1710 1781 0 1664 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 65.5 6.9 7.5 0.0 57.0 13.5 0.0 9.0 5.7 0.0 20.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 65.5 6.9 7.5 0.0 57.0 13.5 0.0 9.0 5.7 0.0 20.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.69
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 237 1021 865 111 0 877 200 0 420 111 0 326 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 1.22 0.21 1.01 0.00 1.32 1.06 0.00 0.37 0.77 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 877 200 0 420 111 0 326 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.3 27.3 14.0 56.3 0.0 31.5 53.2 0.0 37.5 55.4 0.0 47.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.1 106.9 0.1 86.9 0.0 151.9 81.2 0.0 2.5 27.8 0.0 30.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.1 56.3 2.4 6.0 0.0 60.3 10.5 0.0 4.1 3.4 0.0 11.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 64.3 134.2 14.1 143.2 0.0 183.3 134.5 0.0 40.0 83.2 0.0 77.8 LnGrp LOS E F B F F F D F E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1606 1269 367 381
Approach Delay, s/veh 112.8 179.8 94.8 79.0
Approach LOS F F F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.0 10.0 68.0 16.0 26.0 18.5 59.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.7 11.0 9.5 67.5 15.5 22.8 14.0 59.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 130.9
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 73
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 837
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1467 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 13 20 50 Without Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 20.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1317 108 209 1734 56 233
Future Vol, veh/h 1317 108 209 1734 56 233
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1386 114 220 1825 59 245
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1500 0 2796 750
Stage 1 - - - - 1443 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1353 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 443 - ~ 15 354
Stage 1 - - - - 184 -
Stage 2 - - - - 205 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 443 - ~ 7 354
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 83 -
Stage 1 - - - - 184 -
Stage 2 - - - - 103 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 2.25 247.43

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 217 - - 443 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.399 - - 0.497 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 247.4 - - 20.9 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - C -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 17.4 - - 2.7 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Appendix F - 74
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 838
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1468 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 14 20 50 Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 40 43 237 22 0 41 0 182 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 40 43 237 22 0 41 0 182 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 42 45 249 23 0 43 0 192 0 1 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 23 0 0 87 0 0 587 587 65 564 609 23 Stage 1 - ----- 6 5 6 5- 5 2 2 5 2 2-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 2 3 5 2 2- 4 2 8 7-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 - - 1509 - - 421 422 999 436 410 1054 Stage 1 - ----- 9 4 6 8 4 1- 5 3 8 5 3 1-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 3 7 5 3 1- 9 7 2 8 2 2-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 - - 1509 - - 349 351 999 293 341 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 3 4 9 3 5 1- 2 9 3 3 4 1-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 4 6 8 4 1- 4 4 8 4 4 2-
Stage 2 - ----- 4 4 6 4 4 2- 7 8 6 8 2 2-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 7.19 12.04 15.59

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 745 1592 - - 1489 - - 341
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 - - - 0.165 - - 0.003
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 0 - - 7.9 0 - 15.6
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 0 - - 0.6 - - 0
Appendix F - 75
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 839
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1469 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 14 20 50 Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 223 0 0 281
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 223 0 0 281
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 235 0 0 296
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 531 235 0 0 235 0
Stage 1 235 -----
Stage 2 296 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 509 804 - - 1333 -
Stage 1 804 -----
Stage 2 755 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 509 804 - - 1333 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 587 -----
Stage 1 804 -----
Stage 2 755 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1333 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 -
Appendix F - 76
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 840
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1470 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 14 20 50 Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 198 0 0 268 0
F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 0050004 1 9 800 2 6 80
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 208 0 0 282 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 499 499 282 499 499 208 282 0 0 208 0 0 Stage 1 282 282 - 217 217 -------
Stage 2 217 217 - 282 282 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 482 473 757 482 473 832 1280 - - 1362 - - Stage 1 725 678 - 785 723 -------
Stage 2 785 723 - 725 678 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 480 472 757 477 472 832 1280 - - 1362 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 626 590 - 621 588 -------
Stage 1 725 678 - 783 721 -------
Stage 2 783 721 - 720 678 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.79 0 0.15 0

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1280 - - 757 - 1362 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.007 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 - - 9.8 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 77
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 841
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1471 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 14 20 50 Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 0 100 1 0 0 63 183 0 0 257 14
Future Vol, veh/h 15 0 100 1 0 0 63 183 0 0 257 14
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 16 0 105 1 0 0 66 193 0 0 271 15
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 603 603 278 596 611 193 285 0 0 193 0 0 Stage 1 278 278 - 325 325 -------
Stage 2 325 325 - 271 285 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 411 413 761 415 409 849 1277 - - 1381 - - Stage 1 729 681 - 687 649 -------
Stage 2 687 649 - 735 676 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 389 391 761 339 388 849 1277 - - 1381 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 556 530 - 487 510 -------
Stage 1 729 681 - 651 615 -------
Stage 2 651 615 - 634 676 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.64 12.4 2.04 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1277 - - 556 761 487 1381 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - - 0.028 0.138 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8 - - 11.7 10.5 12.4 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BBBA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 0.5 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 78
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 842
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1472 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 14 2050 Without Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 151 1174 288 233 1006 75 359 90 267 88 103 196 Future Volume (veh/h) 151 1174 288 233 1006 75 359 90 267 88 103 196 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 159 1236 303 245 1059 79 378 95 281 93 108 206 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 186 1068 905 111 910 68 186 92 272 111 103 197 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1719 128 1781 417 1232 1781 575 1097 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 159 1236 303 245 0 1138 378 0 376 93 0 314 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1847 1781 0 1649 1781 0 1673 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.5 68.5 12.2 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.5 6.2 0.0 21.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.5 68.5 12.2 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.5 6.2 0.0 21.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.66
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 978 186 0 364 111 0 300 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 1.16 0.33 2.20 0.00 1.16 2.04 0.00 1.03 0.84 0.00 1.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 978 186 0 364 111 0 300 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.9 25.8 13.7 56.3 0.0 28.3 53.7 0.0 46.8 55.6 0.0 49.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 30.6 81.7 0.2 568.5 0.0 85.2 485.1 0.0 55.9 39.6 0.0 65.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 50.9 4.1 20.9 0.0 48.3 30.6 0.0 16.4 3.9 0.0 14.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 83.4 107.5 13.9 624.7 0.0 113.5 538.8 0.0 102.6 95.3 0.0 114.3 LnGrp LOS F F B FF FF FF
Approach Vol, veh/h 1698 1383 754 407
Approach Delay, s/veh 88.5 204.0 321.3 109.9
Approach LOS FFFF
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 29.0 10.0 71.0 15.0 24.0 15.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 28.5 9.5 70.5 14.5 23.5 12.5 65.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 169.6
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 79
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 843
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1473 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 14 20 50 Without Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 23.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1679 45 192 1419 65 161
Future Vol, veh/h 1679 45 192 1419 65 161
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1767 47 202 1494 68 169
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1815 0 2942 907
Stage 1 - - - - 1791 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1151 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 334 - ~ 12 278
Stage 1 - - - - 119 -
Stage 2 - - - - 263 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 334 - ~ 5 278
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 72 -
Stage 1 - - - - 119 -
Stage 2 - - - - 104 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.69 $ 337.29

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 152 - - 334 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.566 - - 0.605 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) $ 337.3 - - 30.9 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - D -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 16.2 - - 3.7 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Appendix F - 80
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 844
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1474 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 15 2050 With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 65 264 48 1 69 0 269 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 65 264 48 1 69 0 269 0 0 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 27 66 269 49 1 70 0 274 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 50 0 0 93 0 0 647 648 60 615 681 49 Stage 1 - ----- 6 0 6 0- 5 8 8 5 8 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 8 8 5 8 9- 2 7 9 3-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1502 - - 384 389 1006 404 373 1019 Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 2 8 4 5- 4 9 5 4 9 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 4 9 5 4 9 6- 9 9 1 8 1 8-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1502 - - 313 317 1006 239 304 1019 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 3 1 3 3 1 7- 2 3 9 3 0 4-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 5 2 8 4 5- 4 0 4 4 0 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 4 0 4 4 0 4- 7 2 0 8 1 8-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 6.68 15.24 0

HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 693 1557 - - 1460 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.498 - - - 0.179 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.2 0 - - 7.9 0 - 0
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.8 0 - - 0.7 - - -
Appendix F - 81
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 845
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1475 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 15 2050 With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 2 336 9 6 323
Future Vol, veh/h 7 2 336 9 6 323
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 2 354 9 6 340
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 711 358 0 0 363 0
Stage 1 358 -----
Stage 2 353 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 399 686 - - 1195 -
Stage 1 707 -----
Stage 2 711 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 397 686 - - 1195 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 504 -----
Stage 1 707 -----
Stage 2 708 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.84 0 0.15

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 536 1195 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.018 0.005 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 11.8 8 -
HCM Lane LOS - - B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
Appendix F - 82
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 846
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1476 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 15 2050 With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 1 209 1 1010 3 0 1 2 64 2 9 50 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 1 209 1 1010 3 0 1 2 64 2 9 50 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 1 309 1 2010 3 1 7 2 74 3 1 10
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 636 663 311 649 649 331 311 0 0 344 0 0 Stage 1 319 319 - 331 331 -------
Stage 2 317 344 - 319 319 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 391 382 730 383 388 711 1250 - - 1215 - - Stage 1 693 653 - 683 645 -------
Stage 2 694 637 - 693 653 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 389 380 730 376 387 711 1250 - - 1215 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 559 526 - 551 533 -------
Stage 1 690 651 - 683 645 -------
Stage 2 693 637 - 681 651 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.01 11.56 0 0.11

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1250 - - 622 561 1215 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.036 0.023 0.003 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 11 11.6 8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
Appendix F - 83
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 847
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1477 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 15 2050 With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 0 67 0 0 0 75 316 0 0 293 14
Future Vol, veh/h 11 0 67 0 0 0 75 316 0 0 293 14
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 12 0 71 0 0 0 79 333 0 0 308 15
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 806 806 316 799 814 333 323 0 0 333 0 0 Stage 1 316 316 - 491 491 -------
Stage 2 491 491 - 308 323 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 300 315 725 304 312 709 1237 - - 1227 - - Stage 1 695 655 - 559 548 -------
Stage 2 559 548 - 702 650 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 281 295 725 257 292 709 1237 - - 1227 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 456 449 - 422 433 -------
Stage 1 695 655 - 524 513 -------
Stage 2 524 513 - 633 650 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.87 0 1.56 0

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1237 - - 456 725 - 1227 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 - - 0.025 0.097 ----
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.1 - - 13.1 10.5 0 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BBAA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 0.3 - 0 - -
Appendix F - 84
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 848
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1478 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 15 2050 With Prj AM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 201 1181 170 106 1016 88 202 76 76 83 89 208 Future Volume (veh/h) 201 1181 170 106 1016 88 202 76 76 83 89 208 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 212 1243 179 112 1069 93 213 80 80 87 94 219 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 245 1021 865 111 799 69 200 211 211 111 98 228 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1696 148 1781 858 858 1781 499 1162 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 212 1243 179 112 0 1162 213 0 160 87 0 313 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1844 1781 0 1716 1781 0 1661 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.0 65.5 6.9 7.5 0.0 56.5 13.5 0.0 9.3 5.8 0.0 22.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.0 65.5 6.9 7.5 0.0 56.5 13.5 0.0 9.3 5.8 0.0 22.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.70
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 868 200 0 422 111 0 325 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 1.22 0.21 1.01 0.00 1.34 1.06 0.00 0.38 0.78 0.00 0.96 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 245 1021 865 111 0 868 200 0 422 111 0 325 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 27.3 14.0 56.3 0.0 31.8 53.2 0.0 37.6 55.4 0.0 47.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 26.1 106.9 0.1 86.9 0.0 160.1 81.2 0.0 2.6 29.3 0.0 41.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.8 56.3 2.4 6.0 0.0 61.7 10.5 0.0 4.2 3.4 0.0 12.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 76.8 134.2 14.1 143.2 0.0 191.9 134.5 0.0 40.2 84.7 0.0 89.0 LnGrp LOS E F B F F F D F F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1634 1274 373 400
Approach Delay, s/veh 113.6 187.6 94.0 88.1
Approach LOS FFFF
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.0 10.0 68.0 16.0 26.0 19.0 59.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 27.5 5.5 63.5 11.5 21.5 14.5 54.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.8 11.3 9.5 67.5 15.5 24.4 16.0 58.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 134.4
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 85
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 849
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1479 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 15 2050 With Prj AM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 22.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1317 118 209 1734 59 233
Future Vol, veh/h 1317 118 209 1734 59 233
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1386 124 220 1825 62 245
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1511 0 2801 755
Stage 1 - - - - 1448 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1353 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 439 - ~ 15 351
Stage 1 - - - - 182 -
Stage 2 - - - - 205 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 439 - ~ 7 351
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 83 -
Stage 1 - - - - 182 -
Stage 2 - - - - 102 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 2.28 268.99

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 212 - - 439 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.449 - - 0.501 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 269 - - 21.2 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - C -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 18.2 - - 2.7 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Appendix F - 86
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 850
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1480 of 3153

1: Trumble Road & Watson Road
HCM 7th TWSC 16 2050 With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 40 43 240 22 0 41 0 192 0 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 40 43 240 22 0 41 0 192 0 1 0
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 42 45 253 23 0 43 0 202 0 1 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 23 0 0 87 0 0 594 593 65 571 616 23 Stage 1 - ----- 6 5 6 5- 5 2 8 5 2 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 2 9 5 2 8- 4 2 8 7-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 ------ 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 - - 1509 - - 417 418 999 432 406 1054 Stage 1 - ----- 9 4 6 8 4 1- 5 3 4 5 2 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 5 3 3 5 2 7- 9 7 2 8 2 2-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 - - 1509 - - 345 347 999 286 337 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 3 4 5 3 4 7- 2 8 6 3 3 7-
Stage 1 - ----- 9 4 6 8 4 1- 4 4 3 4 3 8-
Stage 2 - ----- 4 4 2 4 3 8- 7 7 6 8 2 2-
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 7.21 12.12 15.71

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 749 1592 - - 1489 - - 337
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.327 - - - 0.167 - - 0.003
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.1 0 - - 7.9 0 - 15.7
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 0 - - 0.6 - - 0
Appendix F - 87
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 851
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1481 of 3153

2: Trumble Road & Driveway 1
HCM 7th TWSC 16 2050 With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 6 227 8 2 282
Future Vol, veh/h 13 6 227 8 2 282
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 6 239 8 2 297
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 544 243 0 0 247 0
Stage 1 243 -----
Stage 2 301 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 500 796 - - 1318 -
Stage 1 797 -----
Stage 2 751 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 499 796 - - 1318 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 580 -----
Stage 1 797 -----
Stage 2 750 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.86 0 0.05

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 634 1318 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.032 0.002 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 10.9 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
Appendix F - 88
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 852
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1482 of 3153

3: Trumble Road & Driveway 2
HCM 7th TWSC 16 2050 With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
T r a f f i c V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 2 0 6 1 31 2 8 10 F u t u r e V o l , v e h / h 005 3 0044 2 0 6 1 31 2 8 10 C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
M v m t F l o w 005 3 2044 2 1 7 1 41 2 9 60
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 523 537 296 530 530 224 296 0 0 231 0 0 Stage 1 298 298 - 232 232 -------
Stage 2 225 239 - 298 298 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 464 450 744 460 455 816 1266 - - 1337 - - Stage 1 711 667 - 771 712 -------
Stage 2 777 708 - 711 667 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 460 449 744 454 453 816 1266 - - 1337 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 611 574 - 605 575 -------
Stage 1 710 666 - 768 710 -------
Stage 2 771 705 - 705 666 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.88 11.12 0.14 0.03

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1266 - - 744 624 1337 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.007 0.057 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.9 - - 9.9 11.1 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.2 0 - -
Appendix F - 89
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 853
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1483 of 3153

4: Trumble Road & Illinois Avenue
HCM 7th TWSC 16 2050 With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 0 100 1 0 0 63 203 0 0 299 14
Future Vol, veh/h 15 0 100 1 0 0 63 203 0 0 299 14
C o n f l i c t i n g P e d s , # / h r 000000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 98 ----- 9 9-- 0--
Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - - 2 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
H e a v y V e h i c l e s , % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 16 0 105 1 0 0 66 214 0 0 315 15
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 668 668 322 661 676 214 329 0 0 214 0 0 Stage 1 322 322 - 346 346 -------
Stage 2 346 346 - 315 329 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2- 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 372 379 719 376 375 826 1230 - - 1356 - - Stage 1 690 651 - 669 635 -------
Stage 2 669 635 - 696 646 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 352 358 719 303 355 826 1230 - - 1356 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 528 507 - 455 485 -------
Stage 1 690 651 - 633 601 -------
Stage 2 633 601 - 594 646 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.02 12.93 1.92 0

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1230 - - 528 719 455 1356 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.054 - - 0.03 0.146 0.002 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.1 - - 12 10.9 12.9 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - BBBA - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 0.5 0 0 - -
Appendix F - 90
~ l+ ~ l+
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 854
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1484 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 16 2050 With Prj PM Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 169 1174 288 233 1006 76 359 92 267 92 109 228 Future Volume (veh/h) 169 1174 288 233 1006 76 359 92 267 92 109 228 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 178 1236 303 245 1059 80 378 97 281 97 115 240 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 186 1068 905 111 909 69 186 93 271 111 97 202 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1717 130 1781 423 1226 1781 540 1127 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 178 1236 303 245 0 1139 378 0 378 97 0 355 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1847 1781 0 1650 1781 0 1667 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.9 68.5 12.2 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.5 6.5 0.0 21.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 68.5 12.2 7.5 0.0 63.5 12.5 0.0 26.5 6.5 0.0 21.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.68
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 977 186 0 364 111 0 299 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 1.16 0.33 2.20 0.00 1.17 2.04 0.00 1.04 0.87 0.00 1.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 186 1068 905 111 0 977 186 0 364 111 0 299 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.5 25.8 13.7 56.3 0.0 28.3 53.7 0.0 46.8 55.8 0.0 49.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 54.1 81.7 0.2 568.5 0.0 85.7 485.1 0.0 57.2 47.8 0.0 113.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 50.9 4.1 20.9 0.0 48.4 30.6 0.0 16.6 4.3 0.0 18.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 107.6 107.5 13.9 624.7 0.0 113.9 538.8 0.0 104.0 103.6 0.0 162.4 LnGrp LOS F F B FF FF FF
Approach Vol, veh/h 1717 1384 756 452
Approach Delay, s/veh 91.0 204.4 321.4 149.8
Approach LOS FFFF
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 29.0 10.0 71.0 15.0 24.0 15.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.5 28.5 9.5 70.5 14.5 23.5 13.9 65.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 174.0
HCM 7th LOS F
Appendix F - 91
t
t ., ~ ~
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 855
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1485 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th TWSC 16 2050 With Prj PM
Trumble Watson.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 28.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1679 48 192 1419 75 161
Future Vol, veh/h 1679 48 192 1419 75 161
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 147 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 2 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1767 51 202 1494 79 169
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1818 0 2944 909
Stage 1 - - - - 1793 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1151 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 333 - ~ 12 278
Stage 1 - - - - 118 -
Stage 2 - - - - 263 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 333 - ~ 5 278
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 71 -
Stage 1 - - - - 118 -
Stage 2 - - - - 104 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.71 $ 404.38

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 145 - - 333 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.718 - - 0.606 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) $ 404.4 - - 31.1 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - D -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 18.1 - - 3.8 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Appendix F - 92
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 856
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1486 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 11 OY Cumul With Prj AM - Circulation Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 193 1125 162 101 968 84 192 73 72 79 85 199 Future Volume (veh/h) 193 1125 162 101 968 84 192 73 72 79 85 199 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 203 1184 171 106 1019 88 202 77 76 83 89 209 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 259 1422 634 159 1223 545 315 658 558 134 628 532 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 203 1184 171 106 1019 88 202 77 76 83 89 209 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.2 36.0 8.7 6.9 31.6 4.6 6.8 3.3 3.9 5.4 4.0 12.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.2 36.0 8.7 6.9 31.6 4.6 6.8 3.3 3.9 5.4 4.0 12.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 259 1422 634 159 1223 545 315 658 558 134 628 532 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.83 0.27 0.67 0.83 0.16 0.64 0.12 0.14 0.62 0.14 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 364 1703 760 230 1436 641 389 658 558 200 628 532 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.4 32.4 24.2 52.9 36.2 27.3 52.6 26.3 26.5 53.8 27.8 30.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 3.2 0.2 4.7 3.8 0.1 2.5 0.4 0.5 4.6 0.5 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 15.2 3.2 3.2 13.7 1.7 3.0 1.6 1.5 2.5 1.8 4.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 56.6 35.5 24.4 57.6 40.0 27.5 55.1 26.6 27.0 58.5 28.3 32.6 LnGrp LOS E D C E D C E C C E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1558 1213 355 381
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 40.6 42.9 37.2
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 44.7 13.2 50.5 13.4 42.8 20.0 43.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 21.5 13.5 55.5 11.5 21.5 22.5 46.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 5.9 8.9 38.0 8.8 14.1 15.2 33.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.5 0.1 8.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 5.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 38.9
HCM 7th LOS D
Appendix F - 93
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 857
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1487 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 12 OY Cumul With Prj PM - Circulation Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 162 1118 274 222 958 72 342 88 254 88 104 219 Future Volume (veh/h) 162 1118 274 222 958 72 342 88 254 88 104 219 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 171 1177 288 234 1008 76 360 93 267 93 109 231 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 227 1340 598 289 1464 653 469 554 470 145 453 384 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.38 0.38 0.16 0.41 0.41 0.14 0.30 0.30 0.08 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 171 1177 288 234 1008 76 360 93 267 93 109 231 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.1 37.0 16.6 15.2 27.9 3.6 12.1 4.4 17.1 6.1 5.6 15.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.1 37.0 16.6 15.2 27.9 3.6 12.1 4.4 17.1 6.1 5.6 15.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 227 1340 598 289 1464 653 469 554 470 145 453 384 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.88 0.48 0.81 0.69 0.12 0.77 0.17 0.57 0.64 0.24 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 303 1407 627 349 1498 668 504 554 470 191 453 384 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.6 34.8 28.5 48.5 29.0 21.8 50.0 31.3 35.7 53.4 36.6 40.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 6.5 0.6 11.4 1.3 0.1 6.6 0.7 4.9 4.7 1.3 6.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 16.4 6.2 7.5 11.5 1.3 5.6 2.1 7.0 2.8 2.7 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 57.8 41.3 29.1 59.9 30.3 21.9 56.7 31.9 40.7 58.1 37.9 47.2 LnGrp LOS E D C E C C E C D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1636 1318 720 433
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.9 35.1 47.5 47.2
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.3 38.1 21.9 47.7 18.8 31.5 17.8 51.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.9 24.1 21.5 45.5 15.5 19.5 18.4 48.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 19.1 17.2 39.0 14.1 17.5 13.1 29.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.2 4.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 6.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 40.8
HCM 7th LOS D
Appendix F - 94
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 858
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1488 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 15 2050 With Prj AM - Cir Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 201 1181 170 106 1016 88 202 76 76 83 89 208 Future Volume (veh/h) 201 1181 170 106 1016 88 202 76 76 83 89 208 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 212 1243 179 112 1069 93 213 80 80 87 94 219 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 285 1599 713 178 1385 618 359 487 413 148 449 380 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 212 1243 179 112 1069 93 213 80 80 87 94 219 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 27.8 6.6 5.7 24.6 3.6 5.5 3.1 3.7 4.4 3.8 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 27.8 6.6 5.7 24.6 3.6 5.5 3.1 3.7 4.4 3.8 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 285 1599 713 178 1385 618 359 487 413 148 449 380 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.78 0.25 0.63 0.77 0.15 0.59 0.16 0.19 0.59 0.21 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 465 2217 989 294 1876 837 498 487 413 237 449 380 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.6 21.8 16.0 40.6 25.0 18.5 40.1 26.8 27.0 41.4 28.5 31.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 1.2 0.2 3.7 1.4 0.1 1.6 0.7 1.0 3.7 1.1 6.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 10.6 2.2 2.6 9.7 1.2 2.4 1.5 1.4 2.0 1.7 4.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.4 23.0 16.2 44.2 26.4 18.7 41.7 27.5 28.0 45.1 29.6 37.6 L n G r p L O S DCBDCBDCCDCD
Approach Vol, veh/h 1634 1274 373 400
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.7 27.4 35.7 37.4
Approach LOS CCDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 26.9 11.9 44.7 12.2 25.0 17.5 39.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 21.5 13.5 56.5 11.5 20.5 22.5 47.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 5.7 7.7 29.8 7.5 13.4 12.6 26.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.5 0.1 10.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 7.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 28.1
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 95
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 859
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1489 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 15 2050 With Prj AM - Cir Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1317 118 209 1734 59 233
Future Volume (veh/h) 1317 118 209 1734 59 233
I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1386 124 220 1825 62 245
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1911 170 275 2680 67 263
Arrive On Green 0.58 0.58 0.15 0.75 0.20 0.20
Sat Flow, veh/h 3394 294 1781 3647 326 1290
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 743 767 220 1825 308 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1817 1781 1777 1622 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 36.3 36.9 14.3 31.1 22.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 36.3 36.9 14.3 31.1 22.4 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.16 1.00 0.20 0.80
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1029 1052 275 2680 331 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.73 0.80 0.68 0.93 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1029 1052 334 2680 331 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.3 18.4 49.0 7.5 46.9 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.4 4.4 10.9 1.4 34.5 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.7 15.2 7.0 9.2 12.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.7 22.8 59.9 8.9 81.4 0.0
LnGrp LOS C C E A F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1510 2045 308
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.7 14.4 81.4
Approach LOS C B F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.0 72.0 93.0 27.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 63.5 88.5 22.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.3 38.9 33.1 24.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 11.2 23.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.0
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 96
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 860
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1490 of 3153

5: Trumble Road & Ethanac Road
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 16 2050 With Prj PM - Cir Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 169 1174 288 233 1006 76 359 92 267 92 109 228 Future Volume (veh/h) 169 1174 288 233 1006 76 359 92 267 92 109 228 I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 178 1236 303 245 1059 80 378 97 281 97 115 240 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 234 1632 728 140 1446 645 453 520 441 140 422 358 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.46 0.46 0.08 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 178 1236 303 245 1059 80 378 97 281 97 115 240 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 27.5 12.2 7.5 24.0 3.0 10.2 3.8 14.8 5.1 4.8 13.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 27.5 12.2 7.5 24.0 3.0 10.2 3.8 14.8 5.1 4.8 13.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 234 1632 728 140 1446 645 453 520 441 140 422 358 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.76 0.42 1.75 0.73 0.12 0.83 0.19 0.64 0.69 0.27 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 234 2555 1140 140 2369 1057 453 520 441 140 422 358 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 21.3 17.2 43.9 23.9 17.6 40.4 26.2 30.2 42.8 30.4 33.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.7 0.7 0.4 363.9 0.7 0.1 12.6 0.8 6.9 13.5 1.6 9.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 10.3 4.1 17.3 9.3 1.0 5.1 1.8 6.1 2.7 2.3 5.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 53.6 22.1 17.6 407.7 24.6 17.7 52.9 27.0 37.0 56.3 32.0 43.3 LnGrp LOS D C B F C B D C D E C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1717 1384 756 452
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 92.0 43.7 43.2
Approach LOS C F D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 29.0 10.0 46.3 15.0 24.0 15.0 41.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 24.5 5.5 66.5 10.5 19.5 10.5 61.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 16.8 9.5 29.5 12.2 15.2 11.2 26.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 8.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 51.5
HCM 7th LOS D
Appendix F - 97
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 861
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1491 of 3153

6: Watson Road & US Highway 74
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 16 2050 With Prj PM - Cir Imp Trumble Watson Cir Imp.syn
Synchro 12 Report Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1679 48 192 1419 75 161
Future Volume (veh/h) 1679 48 192 1419 75 161
I n i t i a l Q ( Q b ) , v e h 000000
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1767 51 202 1494 79 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
P e r c e n t H e a v y V e h , % 222222
Cap, veh/h 2168 62 256 2769 93 200
Arrive On Green 0.61 0.61 0.14 0.78 0.18 0.18
Sat Flow, veh/h 3621 101 1781 3647 521 1115
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 887 931 202 1494 249 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1852 1781 1777 1644 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 46.1 46.8 13.1 19.2 17.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 46.1 46.8 13.1 19.2 17.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.05 1.00 0.32 0.68
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1092 1138 256 2769 294 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.82 0.79 0.54 0.85 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1092 1138 289 2769 294 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.8 17.9 49.6 5.0 47.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 6.6 12.3 0.8 24.7 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 18.5 19.5 6.6 5.2 9.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.4 24.5 61.9 5.8 72.3 0.0
LnGrp LOS C C E A E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1818 1696 249
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 12.5 72.3
Approach LOS C B E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.7 76.3 96.0 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 69.5 91.5 19.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.1 48.8 21.2 19.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 13.1 16.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.2
HCM 7th LOS C
Appendix F - 98
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 862
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1492 of 3153

Appendix I
VMT Memorandum

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 863
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1493 of 3153

m e m o r a n d u m
DATE: May 9, 2025
TO: Christopher Heron, City of Menifee
Ryan Luckert, Environmental Planner, Rincon Consultants, Inc.

FROM: Deepali Chausalkar
Sandipan Bhattacharjee
SUBJECT: Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse – VMT Screening

Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening f or the proposed project in the City of Menifee in the Riverside County. The proposed project site is located at the southeast corner o f the intersection of Trumble Road and Watson Road in the City of Menifee. The proposed project includes construction of a 328,205 square foot warehouse. Figure 1 shows the site plan for the project.

NEED FOR VMT ANALYSIS
The City of Menifee has adopted CEQA thresholds under Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) pursuant to Senate Bill – 743 (SB-743). Based on the City of Menifee’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled (Updated January, 2022) , the following three screening criteria are applied to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment:

1. Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening. Projects located within a TPA may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:
 Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;
 Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);
 Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities St rategy(as decided by the City of Menifee, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or
 Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

Based on the evaluation conducted using the WRCOG VMT too l, the proposed project is not located within a TPA.

Therefore, TPA screening criterion does not apply for the proposed project.

2. Low VMT Area Screening. Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.

For this screening in the City of Menifee, the RIVCOM travel forecasting model is used to measure VMT performance for individual jurisdictions and for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) is the metric used by the City. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips.

To identify if the project falls withing the low VMT – generating areas, the WRCOG screening tool was used. Based on the guidelines, a project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if the following condition is satisfied:
 The baseline project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the County of Riverside General Plan Buildout VMT per service population.

As mentioned in the City’s Guidelines, the County VMT/service population threshold is 33.6 which is based on Origin Destination OD/VMT per service population methodology for County General Plan Buildout and RIVCOM.

Based on the evaluation done using WRCOG VMT Tool, the proposed project is located within TAZ 1098 and the baseline (2018) project generated VMT per service population (32.96) does not exceed the threshold Jurisdiction VMT tran slutions
the transportatio n solut ions company. ..

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 864
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1494 of 3153

Memorandum: Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse – VMT Screening May 9, 2025

P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\VMT\VMT Memo - Watson Trumble Menifee.docx 2

the transportation solutions company...
per service population (33.6). Figure 2 illustrates the locat ion of the project with respect to the Low VMT area.

Therefore, the project screens out of a VMT analysis and impacts are considered less than significant.

3. Project Type Screening. Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary . Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel. In addition to local serving retail, the following uses can also be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence of the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
 Local-serving K-12 schools
 Local parks
 Day care centers
 Local-serving gas stations, banks, restaurants, shopping center  Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels)
 Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses  Community institutions (Public libraries, fire stations, local government)  Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS  Affordable or supportive housing
 Assisted Living facilities
 Senior housing as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and urban Development (HUD)  Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips o This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
o 11 single family housing units
o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units o 10,000 sq.ft of office
o 15,000 sq.ft of light industrial
o 63,000 sq.ft. of warehousing
o 79,000 sq.ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse The proposed project includes construction of a 328,205 square foot wa rehouse which is more than the screening criterion of 63,000 square feet of warehousing space. Therefore, the proposed project does not screen out of a VMT analysis based on this criterion.

CONCLUSION
Based on the above analysis, the project screens out of a VMT analysis as it is located in a low VMT area, and the VMT impacts under CEQA are considered to be less than significant.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 865
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1495 of 3153

Source: TIMS/SWITRS Gis Map Figure 1
Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse
Project Site Plan
the transportation solutions company...

P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\VMT\Z30 01 Site Plan Landscape.xlsx (5/9/2025) '-,,,,',,,0 ::,~,.i .
',, '­
', ,...,.. -;'~---✓✓ ·,.
✓ -· /
/ . ___ ,,,
"", ";.""•~;•.~ ';", ,,
" rl-+~~--t - • ~ 1~ i
I ' i
!i': i ____ J _ __________ ; ________ _
:~ I ,
I , i I
i~ I I
c l
.. 1
o l
"' i
I w;
~i
i· i !
- ~~~~~~~.~/;jg, J:_ _J __ ____ J
, 1, ·eu1LOiNG • I "' I
=> 1
I~ i
,-'''-=''>W.~ '-
j <,!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
translutions
, J_ __ 328 ,205 S.F. [_
ix I i
t - --,---
1;.:
, ·f,';- ·-·-: - ·-·
i~
I~·
··- ·-•-i--•
jx
IAL j ,
• f . !~
- " -r------'- -- " - ,
i !
' r-! i ;-
i
I j
-- --~- - ----- - ~-
. i
I i
I
~
--------t I
==[;,;s •
-------{
•
----
'i
1 ~
~ l
--------t ~ i,
~ ''1 i ,,

PROJECT INFORMATION

TABULATION
BULDING_.I.~
-·· IQlA L
Cni.' ERAGE

AUTOPARKINOAEOUIRED
'1'"1H:'/1 000 d.(f 0Lt100kL .I.)
\".i1se. '/1~t .l . (1:iok-5CO.tlJ

AUTO PA,OONQPRQVIDED
S:anca •d ( ~· ._ 18')
11~~1•nil)le ( 9, 1$';
Va ~ Acc nL;bi. ( 12 ~ 18' ;
EVCS( 6' ~ 18')
r1C$t1~:'9'~ t e,)
Evcsv-,.i.ewo. ( 12'x !C)
EVCSF..t ur~A~~ -ul;,lu·y ( l C• x Hr ;
LVUlf),~:lle(9'~ '/S)
TAAILER;PARKJNGPR) VIQED
T,a,11><('•'.l'xSE')
7~s.s12 ~ r

17.,a~ac
,s,oo:i,r
313.205•' ·
J25.~$1

ZONNG ORDINANCE FOR CITY
Zon11~tlell;ll1&100•l:=ooonetM-r,0011"el'IICoiroot
• Nort:1wn G-,, a~(Br, """.)
MAXIM LU flJILtlNG I-EIGHT ALLCM'ED
Htig hl• 100 '
MAXIMIM A.QORA- RA,TIQ
ACTU,,,L FLOOR AR&\ RA. TIO
FAR.o ,u
LAICISCAPERB:lll-e-l T
Pu c•nla(l • • IO"lo

LAIOSCAPEPROVIDED
P,uc•nla(l • • ll .4%

SETBACKS
STATfM91T OFOPERATKlN
Sr,er.u1..i .. •Dl!velnp n,.,,1-0ccup.,n=-, ·10p,,r~ ,,,,...n10 (R:tan tel ~ "' G<on..- al" ar•hcuH . disttihucion u,nt..-. an:lslulo1gc: MM1U'o1ct,.,to..Li:lhtcrM:.'ll i.l,'t1-inlc'flSit/ .)

SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
_,, . .. .n .. · ,r•cu .
..... ,c- _,._
;f) ---•"m "' •.v. .. · ·•"
. .._,.,_ ,.,_,:. n .<<H.o. e ..... ,., c
-::.:,,r:~';>,'. .( ~·!>·:· -~:-·--•~· k·F ·;tr,:
l<. ·m,,,.,
/'7\·<.L , .,.,_,,,,..·,~v .u
.,...;, ,,..,.o.,,~,,. .:-11:, ...,._
,) , ... , ... oc,""""''"- ' '"
·,.S .,-,-,,- m r,., n . r • "· . .
t .. , ..
.. ? •..,;r.,.,, .. , ..... , ..
-, _,,;,:..'..:~.- ~. ~'..' : ~;,'.t.. -;, ,·-.::· "'..: ,'t, 'l',,~ ( >,- ,··· ·"'"'- " '· '
( ·• ,- .,. ·0- ,:,:,-,:,r-• ,,., ~
(-.. ; , ..... . .,,.
(· ,,-, ,r,.,c,. rrr. .. -,,- < M:\o fl,; 1;
<'-•)·,n, -,.,.,..,-
;~ .. ,-,·ma.· "'·'

SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES
, n •e· ., .,.., ,~, ., , cr,,.,.. .,u.,_,:,~1·••,,.• "'·' "' ,_ ,· , •• ,, ' "' l'.'<'T .. . , · .,....., , ... , , .. ·,· ~·· · ... , . • _.,,... . " L. 'L" O<•~•e• C< ,CN ' " .:O i l <" l > " -,, , _~ • V! .J!l, c,:,.,,~.;,,, $ .,.._ .,.,. - •(1V . • w., o·r~ > ,-....,,,. r::o rr.,· ,,,.,_, -~« ·,o, n ~ , .,. · - ,~_...,"' ••~•c•,.o "'""··• .. • f .,,',' , . .Y,_ ,/ .,..i,,,.-.,, ., -.. - , , " ,,.r.,;::.,rr .~, . •. , , s,.,. ,,., ~ ·, ... ,· -vr ,,· , ,.,,¥.,,.,,,..,.-,, r, ,,., .. ,,_., . r, ,,.;- f -" W ' " '"•--" •·• o.. n .: ~ .. . ,,.,r:-;:; •· . ,•u. "' ,:,,m;o ·: $P"l 1- •·•:i:
l"•~ a" , 'n -•. 9 .J,; .".>J I O " J · 1 , ,,,,, ... ,,.,, > "" _.,,.,,) '"•-.:·,n, ,, • .,., ,, "" "' ' ,.,,. •. , .... , .. ,,1 . , , .... _ ,.,., ..... , .... ·,.-• .... 1 ~ .. , ,r· :,-. e.1u .. , ,, .,., ~"'<ff"''·-'"·--"''''''

SITE LEGEND
LJ """'" ,_-,,.,,
L;<:~::--·"·· "
s;; ; .• 1,- . -.--." ;
,.. .~.,_, ·,u ••u.·
IQ
El
Ll .. ,,.,,_, ""
LJ ···
L'-'"1; ,', '""· '""'"
ifil

OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 866
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1496 of 3153

Source: TIMS/SWITRS Gis Map Figure 2
Trumble Road and Watson Road Warehouse
Low VMT Area Screening
the transportation solutions company...

P:\Rincon - Watson & Trumble\VMT\Z30 LowVMT.xlsx (5/9/2025) Watson Rd, Menif• X 0..

Complete #1-4, Then Click •Run• x •
Input Output
Output_Parcels
The res ult is dre wn on n: he map_ ••• X
Selected Project Area
The res ult is dra wn on n: e ma p_ ••• X
Low VMT Generating TAZs
The res ult is dre wn on n: e map_ ••• X
roo& ltlldf:@Stik •J+l:441
Outp ut_Parcelsj Selected oj ect Aree l ow VMT Generat ing TAZs Parcels (Zoo m in to v'ew) WRCOG C ·es WRCOG Bound_a_ry~~­ i!! Opt io ns ,,.. I F ,er by map extent I O Zoom to ~ Clear selection C Re 'resh OBJECTID Co p letely w· hin a TPA? w· in a low VMT generat ing TAZ? No (Fei l) Yes ( ass)
translutions
Watson Rd
Parcel: 3292 40 045
APN 329240045
Note
layers
•l!J Outpvt.f'ln; e1,
D
•rJ TAZ80t.rod,r,e, rzoom,ntov ew)
•fa WRCOGUt:u
Co,
(1 =
Scre e ning res ults a re b e.sed o n locat io n of p c.reel 0 centro,ds. I' resu <Sare d esired considering -he fu ll p arcel, p lease re'erto the associated m ap layers to
visually review p arcel and TAZ b oundary
relat;o nship.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 867
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1497 of 3153

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 868
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1498 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Warehouse Project
Plot Plan PLN22-0190
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
prepared by
City of Menifee
Planning Division, Department of Community Development
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, California 92586
Contact: Russell Brown, Senior Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
250 East 1st, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90012
April 2026
EXHIBIT "C"
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 869
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1499 of 3153

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 870
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1500 of 3153

Table of Contents

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Content and Organization of the Final MND .................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Public Review and Responses to Comments .................................................................. 1-2

1.3 Organization of the Responses to Comments ................................................................ 1-2

1.4 Project Decision Process ................................................................................................. 1-2 2 Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR .................................................................................. 2-1

3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program .......................................................................... 3-1

APPENDICES
Appendix A Comment Letters
Appendix B Health Risk Assessment
Appendix C Queueing and Peak Hours Analysis
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 871
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1501 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

ii

This page intentionally left blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 872
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1502 of 3153

Introduction

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration 1-1
1 Introduction
This Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final MND) has been prepared by the City of Menifee, as Lead Agency, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §15000 et seq.). The purpose of this document is to present the results of the Lead Agency’s consideration of all comments received during the public review period for the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND), and to provide the final environmental determination for the Proposed Project.

CEQA requires public agencies to evaluate whether a proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and to prepare an appropriate environmental document that discloses the level of potential environmental impacts. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared for the Proposed Project to determine whether any aspect of the Project, either individually or cumulatively, could result in significant environmental impacts. The IS determined that, although the Project could result in potentially significant environmental effects, all such effects would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of feasible mitigation measures. Therefore, preparation of an MND, rather than an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), is appropriate under CEQA.

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15073, the Draft MND was circulated for public review for the required period. During this time, agencies, organizations, and members of the public were provided an opportunity to comment on the environmental analysis and the findings presented in the Draft MND. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15074(b), the Lead Agency is required to consider the Draft MND together with any comments received during the public review process prior to taking action on the project.

This Final MND includes:
• A summary and reproduction of all comments received on the Draft MND; • The Lead Agency’s responses to those comments, demonstrating good-faith consideration of all public input;
• The finalized mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) required by CEQA Guidelines §15074(d).

The Final MND, together with the Draft MND, technical studies, and all written comments, collectively comprise the administrative record that the Lead Agency’s decision-making body will rely upon in determining whether to adopt the Final MND and approve the Project.

1.1 Content and Organization of the Final MND
The Final MND (this document) summarizes the project information presented in the Draft MND and contains responses to comments on environmental issues received from agencies, organizations, and individuals who reviewed the Draft MND. The contents of the Draft MND, in addition to the following chapters, together constitute the Final MND as required by the CEQA Guidelines.
• Chapter 1 – Introduction. This chapter summarizes the contents of the Final MND and the environmental review process.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 873
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1503 of 3153

1-2

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project
• Chapter 2 – Responses to Comments. During the public review period for the Draft MND, the City received 8 comment letters. This chapter contains summaries of these comment letters and the City’s responses to those comments that raise significant environmental points. A list of individuals, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft MND is provided within this section.
• Chapter 3 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). This chapter includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared in compliance with the requirements of Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15091(d) and 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

1.2 Public Review and Responses to Comments
In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the Draft MND was circulated for public review and comment to responsible agencies and interested parties as well as members of the public. Comment letters received on the Draft MND are provided in their entirety in Chapter 2, Responses to Comments.

Responses to each of the comments received are provided in Chapter 2, Responses to Comments, of this document as part of the Final MND.

1.3 Organization of the Responses to Comments
Responses are not required for comments regarding the merits of the proposed project or regarding issues not related to the Project’s environmental impacts. Several of the comments on the Draft MND state the commenter’s preferences regarding the design or approval of the Proposed Project, potential economic impacts, or provide general statements concerning the content of the Draft MND. Detailed responses are not warranted or required by CEQA for comments that do not address environmental issues related to the proposed project. Such instances are noted in the responses.

The city will review all comments received, including those that do not warrant a response under CEQA, before considering certification of the Final MND or approval of the Proposed Project.

Each comment has been reproduced with individual comments bracketed and numbered according to the type of commenter (agency, organization, and individual) with responses following each comment.

1.4 Project Decision Process
This document and the Draft MND, as amended through responses to comments, together constitute the Final MND, which will be considered by the city prior to a decision on whether to approve the project. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which is required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(d), has been included as part of Chapter 3, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, of this Final MND and will be adopted by the city in conjunction with any project approval.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 874
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1504 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
2 Responses to Comments on the Draft MND
This section of the Final MND contains the comment letters received during the public review period for the Draft MND, which started on October 8, 2025 and concluded on November 6, 2025. In conformance with Section 15088(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, written responses were prepared to address comments received on environmental issues during this review period.

2.1 Comments on the Draft MND
The City of Menifee received eight comment letters on the Draft MND. The commenters, including the numerical designation for each comment letter received and the author of the comment letter.

Letter No. and Commenter
1 Anh Truong, PE, Senior Utilities Engineer, California Public Utilities Commission 2 Vashon Simien, Blum, Collins, & Ho, LLP
3 Patricia Brenes, Planning Manager, City of Perris
4 Harrison Beck, Staff Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity 5 Sam Wang, Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR, South Coast Air Quality Management District
6 Janki Patel, Local Development Review – Division of Transportation Planning, California Department of Transportation
7 Steven Piepkorn, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance 8 Jackie Vega, Urban Regional Planner I, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission The comment letters and responses follow. The comment letters are numbered sequentially and each separate issue raised by the commenter, if more than one, has been assigned a number. The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue (Response A1.1, for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in Comment Letter A1).

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 875
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1505 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 1
COMMENTER: Anh Truong, PE, Senior Utilities Engineer, California Public Utilities Commission DATE: October 27, 2025
Response 1.1
The commenter expresses appreciation for their inclusion in the environmental review process and provides a summary of the Proposed Project.

That said, this comment does not contain a substantive comment on the analysis or conclusions of the Draft MND. Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 1.2
The commenter recommends that the city evaluate potential impacts associated with increased vehicular and pedestrian activity at the existing at-grade highway-rail crossing and should also consider additional improvements.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment and has recorded if for consideration. The Proposed Project would utilize the existing roadway network, including Watson Road, and no modifications to the existing rail crossing were identified as necessary to accommodate Project related traffic. As described in Section 17, Transportation, of the Draft MND, the analysis prepared for the Project evaluated potential traffic impacts associated with Project-generated trips and concluded that the Project would not result in significant transportation impacts. Improvements to the rail crossing or adjacent roadway infrastructure, if required, would be subject to review and approval by the city and other authorities, including the rail operator and applicable transportation authorities. Based on the analysis presented in the Draft MND, the Project would not result in significant impacts related to the existing rail crossing. Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 1.3
This comment states that any crossing modifications would require authorization from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) through a General Order Request. At this time, the Project does not propose any physical changes to the nearby existing rail crossing that would independently result in significant environmental impacts. Should any crossing modifications become necessary during final design or permitting, the CPUC will review any proposed modifications for safety compliance and ensure consistency with GO 88-B. The comment and recommended program have been acknowledged, but no changes to the Draft MND are necessary.

Response 1.4
This comment simply notes RCEB's appreciation for the chance to respond to the Draft MND. With that, no revision to the Draft MND is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 876
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1506 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 2
COMMENTER: Vashon Simien, Blum, Collins, & Ho, LLP
DATE: November 4, 2025
Response 2.1
The comment expresses appreciation for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft MND for the Proposed Project and requests to be added to the Project notification list for future environmental documents, public notices, and hearings.

The city acknowledges the comment and appreciates the participation of the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance in the CEQA review process. The request to be added to the Project notification list has been noted, and the commenter will be included on the distribution list for future notices related to the Project in accordance with CEQA requirements. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

The attachment to this letter is also recognized and that letter supports the comments, below, and has been responded to, accoridngly, throughout the below detailed responses.

Response 2.2
The commenter provides a summary of the Proposed Project, including the size of the warehouse building, office space, loading docks, and parking provided on the Project Site.

The city acknowledges and has noted the comment for the record. The description generally reflects the information provided in the Draft MND regarding the proposed development, including building size, loading docks, and parking supply. The comment does not raise a specific concern or request revisions to the environmental analysis. Therefore, no changes to the Project Description or environmental analysis in the Draft MND are required.

Response 2.3
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND improperly segments or “piecemeals” the Proposed Project by separating site preparation activities and other nearby development Projects. As a result, the commenter contends that all related activities and developments should be evaluated as a single project under CEQA.

The city acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the environmental review improperly segments the Project. The Draft MND evaluates the Proposed Project, including construction and operational activities associated with full development of the Project Site. Prior grading permits and associated environmental review (previous MNDs) addressed specific grading activities (export and fill) and were evaluated independently in accordance with CEQA requirements applicable at the time of approval. The proposed warehouse development represents a separate discretionary project with its own scope of work, environmental analysis, and approvals, which were unknown at the time of preparation of the previous environmental documents for the site. CEQA requires analysis of reasonably predictable connected actions; however, the development projects referenced by the commenter are separate developments subject to their own environmental review processes. Additionally, the Draft MND also evaluates cumulative impacts consistent with Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 877
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1507 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
CEQA requirements, which considers the effects of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects.

Thus, the environmental analysis in the Draft MND appropriately evaluates the Proposed Project and does not improperly segment Project components. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are necessary.

Response 2.4
The commenter states that the Draft MND does not include sufficiently detailed or legible Project plans. The city disagrees with this assertion. The Draft MND includes a description of the Proposed Project and supporting technical documentation sufficient to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the Project, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15124 and 15151.

CEQA requires that environmental documents contain sufficient detail to enable decision-makers and the public to understand the environmental consequences of a project; it does not require the inclusion of all engineering or construction-level design drawings. No revisions to the Draft MND are required in response to this comment.

Response 2.5
The commenter states that states that the Draft MND does not adequately include environmental justice issues in reviewing potential cumulative impacts from the Project. The comment cites several statistics indicating air pollution and socioeconomic conditions within the Project’s census tract.

The commenter also suggests that CalEEMod is not listed as an approved software because it does not reflect the 2022 or 2025 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The comment claims that this represents an inadequate analysis of energy impacts in compliance with Title 24.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the analysis is inadequate. With regard to environmental justice issues, the Draft MND evaluated operational emissions, including diesel particulate matter associated with truck traffic, using the CalEEMod modeling tool and applicable SCAQMD significance thresholds. The analysis concluded that Project-related emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds and would therefore result in less than significant impacts. The analysis of localized air quality impacts has been revised to incorporate the findings of the Project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) prepared by Rincon Consultants (2026) and attached as Appendix B to this Final MND. Further discussion of health risk is included in responses

4.7 and 4.8, below.

The City of Menifee disagrees with the commenter’s assertion that CalEEMod is not the appropriate model for analyzing the Project’s energy impacts. The CalEEMod model is widely recognized by planning agencies and local jurisdictions as the recommended software for CEQA analysis. While the commenter lists examples of other modeling software, such examples are not relevant to the Project’s CEQA review process. Furthermore, the commenter misconstrues CalEEMod’s exclusion of 2022 and 2025 Title 24 Standards as a form of underreporting; however, these codes are more stringent than those utilized for energy and emissions estimates in the Draft MND. Regardless of the model used for CEQA analysis, the Project would be required to comply with the latest Title 24 Standards at the time of environmental review. The Draft MND clearly states that the Project would adhere to the 2025 Title 24 Standards. Therefore, the Draft MND’s analysis represents a conservative quantification of energy use and provides sufficient evidence to support a less than significant conclusion.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 878
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1508 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response 2.6
The commenter states that the Project Site is located within the March Air Reserve Base (MARB)/Inland Port Airport Compatibility Zone D and asserts that the Draft MND does not discuss review by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC) or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

The City of Menifee recognizes the comment and has noted it for the record. The Proposed Project will be reviewed for consistency with applicable airport land use compatibility requirements, including review by RCALUC, as required. The RCALUC have reviewed the Project and submitted a comment letter during the public review period. The Project will also be subject to applicable FAA regulations related to building height and potential hazards to air navigation, if applicable. The Draft MND also evaluated potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts and determined that the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Thus, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 2.7
The comment states that the Draft MND does not adequately analyze the Project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan Land Use Buildout Scenario or regional planning documents, including SCAG’s Connect SoCal Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS).

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the analysis is inadequate. The Project Site is designated Economic Development Corridor - Northern Gateway (EDC-NG) in the City’s General Plan, which allows employment-generating industrial and business park uses. In addition to the Project Site being fully disturbed, the Project is consistent with the permitted uses and development standards for this designation. With that, the Proposed Project has been reviewed for consistency with applicable General Plan policies and zoning regulations and does not require a General Plan amendment.

The Draft MND evaluated the Project’s potential environmental impacts and determined that the Project would not result in significant impacts related to land use or planning and is consistent with long range planning goals. Accordingly, the Draft MND provides an adequate evaluation of land use and planning considerations under CEQA, and no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions are needed.

Response 2.8
The commenter states that the Draft MND does not include a consistency analysis with all applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations intended to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts. As discussed in Section 11, Land Use, the Draft MND evaluates the Proposed Project for consistency with the City’s General Plan land use designation and applicable development standards. Please refer to Response 2.7, above, for more information. The General Plan goals and policies referenced by the commenter provide policy direction for environmental protection, air quality improvement, and greenhouse gas reduction. The Draft MND evaluated the Project’s potential impacts related to air quality (Section 3), greenhouse gas emissions (Section 8), and climate considerations using accepted methodologies and thresholds. The analysis concluded that these impacts would be less than significant.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 879
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1509 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Based on the analysis presented in the Draft MND, the Project would not conflict with applicable General Plan policies related to environmental protection or climate considerations. Therefore, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 2.9
The comment states that the Project conflicts with provisions of the Housing Crisis Act (SB330/SB8) and may reduce residential development capacity under the City’s General Plan land use designation. The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the Draft MND insufficiently evaluates population and housing impacts. As mentioned in Response 2.7, above, the Project Site is designated for EDC-NG uses under the City’s General Plan, which allows for employment-generating commercial and industrial development. Please refer to Response 2.7 and

2.8 for additional information.

What’s more, the Draft MND also evaluated population and housing impacts in Section 14, Population and Housing, of the Draft MND and concluded that the Project would not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth. Project employment estimates are typical of warehouse operations and represent a small portion of the city’s projected employment growth.

Accordingly, the Draft MND provides an adequate evaluation of population and housing impacts under CEQA, and no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions are needed.

Response 2.10
The comment suggests that the impacts of the Draft MND are misrepresented and that the Project would create geometric hazards and emergency access issues. The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the Draft MND insufficiently evaluates VMT and related transportation impacts.

As stated in the Draft MND, and according to the Translutions VMT screening, the Proposed Project was evaluated using the WRCOG VMT screening tool and found to be located within Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 1098. The Project’s baseline (2018) VMT per service population was calculated to be

32.96, which is below the County of Riverside General Plan buildout threshold of 33.6 VMT per service population. As a result, the Project qualifies for screening under the Low VMT Area criterion.

Although the Project exceeds the square footage threshold for the Project Type Screening (328,205 square feet versus the 63,000 square feet warehousing threshold), it still screens out of a full VMT analysis based on its location in a low VMT area. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s impacts to VMT compared to existing conditions and the impacts to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b), were found to be less than significant.

Additionally, Project site plans and potential geometric issues would be subject to city review and approval which would ensure that Project driveway intersections and internal circulation are safe, with adequate sight distance, driveway widths and stop signs where necessary for entering and exiting the site. The final plans will also identify access routes to/from the Project Site and potential turning movement restrictions for City review and approval, as outlined in Appendix H of the Draft MND. This would prevent any potential Project impacts caused by a design feature. Finally, the Proposed Project is required to comply with Fire Department requirements for adequate access. As stated in the Traffic Study to the Draft MND, Project Site access and circulation would provide adequate access, turning radius, and driveway width and spacing for emergency vehicles, consistent with the Fire Department’s requirements.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 880
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1510 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Accordingly, the Draft MND provides an adequate evaluation of VMT and transportation impacts under CEQA, and preparation of an EIR is not required.

Response 2.11
The commenter states that the Draft MND does not adequately evaluate cumulative impacts or the Project’s relationship to General Plan buildout assumptions and regional growth forecasts. The city acknowledges the comment but disagrees with the assertion that the cumulative analysis is inadequate. The Draft MND evaluates the Proposed Project within the context of applicable planning documents, including the City’s General Plan and regional growth projections. The Project Site is designated for industrial and employment-generating uses under the City’s planning framework. The Project’s FAR and anticipated employment levels are within the range of industrial development anticipated under the city’s planning documents. Regional growth forecasts prepared by SCAG are intended as planning tools and do not establish project-level limits on employment or development. The Draft MND also considers cumulative impacts in Section 21 in accordance with CEQA requirements and concludes that the Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts. Accordingly, the Draft MND provides an adequate evaluation of cumulative impacts under CEQA, and preparation of an EIR is not required.

Response 2.12
The commenter states that the Draft MND is inadequate and requests that the city prepare an EIR for the Proposed Project. The commenter also requests to be added to the Project notification list for future environmental documents, notices, and public hearings.

The city acknowledges the comment but disagrees that preparation of an EIR is required. The Draft MND determined that the Project would not result in significant environmental impacts with implementation of the identified mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulations.

Therefore, preparation of an EIR is not required under CEQA.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 881
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1511 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 3
COMMENTER: Patricia Brenes, Planning Manager, City of Perris DATE: November 6, 2025
Response 3.1
The comment states a summary of the Proposed Project and expresses concern that the Draft MND does not adequately analyze potential traffic and transportation impacts. The commenter also encourages the city to consider development practices consistent with AB98 to reduce potential impacts to nearby communities.

The city acknowledges the City of Perris’ interest in the environmental review process and appreciates the comments provided. The Draft MND evaluated potential traffic and transportation impacts in Section 17, Transportation, of the Draft MND based on a traffic impact analysis prepared for the Project by Translutions. The analysis concluded that the Project would not result in significant transportation impacts and would comply with applicable city, regional, and state transportation standards. Overall, under existing and opening year conditions, all intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory LOS. Under opening year cumulative conditions, the intersection of Trumble Road/Ethanac Road is forecast to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service under both without and with Project conditions. Under horizon year conditions, the intersections of Trumble Road/Ethanac Road and Watson Road/SR-74 are forecast to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service under both without and with Project conditions. As discussed in the Draft MND, the implementation of the circulation improvements identified as mitigation measures, all intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service.

Specific comments regarding traffic analysis and recommended measures are addressed in the responses provided in the following sections of this document. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this introductory comment.

Response 3.2
The commenter mentions that the traffic study for the Project is required to evaluate the impacts of the Proposed Project and realignment of Watson Road based on both the City of Menifee and the City of Perris LOA criteria.

The City of Menifee recognizes the comment and has noted it for the record. Per the Project description, the Project will not include high-cube fulfillment center uses as stated by the commenter. Also, it is the understanding of the Draft MND that both driveways can be used by cars and trucks when looking at Project trip distribution. To note, this was part of the scoping agreement sent to both the City of Menifee and the City of Perris. Additionally, upon testing, even if all trips are assigned to one driveway, the LOS under Horizon Year Conditions was found to be LOS B.

The commenter also states the Draft MND should also verity the list of cumulative projects with the City of Perris. It should be noted that the list of related projects were provided by the City of Perris, as noted in the Draft MND.

With regard to existing traffic volumes, the overall traffic volumes were collected by Counts Unlimited when Trumble Road and Highway 74 were open.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 882
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1512 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
The commenter also notes circulation improvements identified in the Draft MND and their fair share percentage. Fair shares are almost never based on Opening year volumes, especially for locations where the pre-Project LOS is unacceptable since it would violate Government Code 66000 and the requirements for Nexus and Rough Proportionality set by Nollan and Dolan. In addition, the widening of Ethanac Road is included in the TUMF. To note, fair share for Watson Road and SR-75 are based on the Horizon Year.

The comment goes on to ask for a formal access analysis, truck turning exhibit, and queueing analysis as part of the Project and this Final MND. A formal access analysis and turning radii will be presented as part of the plan check process during Project approval, if required by the city. These types of documents are not typically presented within the environmental clearance document.

However, a queueing analysis has been prepared and is attached as Appendix C to this Final MND, for informational purposes.

Finally, the commenter has asked that existing peak hour factors be used for all LOS calculation in both and existing and opening year scenarios. To comply with this request, the Project applicant has prepared a peak hour warrant analysis, which is attached as Appendix C to this Final MND.

It should be noted that final site design and operational details will continue to be evaluated through the city’s project review process to ensure consistency with applicable city requirements.

Thus, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 3.3
The commenter encourages the City of Menifee to apply development standards consistent with AB98, including landscape setbacks and buffering trees adjacent to nearby sensitive receptors.

The City of Menifee recognizes the comment and has noted it for the record. AB98 establishes development standards for certain warehouse Projects; however, the applicability and implementation of AB98 are governed by state law and the specific provisions of the statute. The Proposed Project will be required to comply with all applicable state and local regulations in effect at the time of Project approval and building permit issuance. Additionally, the Draft MND evaluated potential impacts related to land use compatibility, noise, air quality, and other environmental topics, including the proximity of nearby residential uses. The additional measures recommended by the commenter have been noted for the record and will be taken into consideration during the review process. At this time, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 3.4
The commenter mentions that the Proposed Project does not comply with certain provisions of the City of Menifee’s Industrial Good Neighbor Policies related to setbacks from sensitive receptors, truck queuing, and separation of truck and passenger vehicle access. The city acknowledges the comment for the record. The Industrial Good Neighbor Policies are intended to provide design guidance for industrial development projects. The Proposed Project has been reviewed for consistency with applicable city development standards and policies as part of the city’s discretionary review process. The Project incorporates setbacks, landscaping, and on-site circulation features designed to accommodate truck and passenger vehicle activity while minimizing potential conflicts and impacts to adjacent land uses, as noted by the commenter. The Project also includes on-site truck queuing areas to prevent trucks from staging on public streets. Please see Appendix C Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 883
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1513 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
for a detailed analysis of truck queueing, which has been provided as part of the Final MND from Translutions. Final site design and operational details will continue to be evaluated through the city’s project review process to ensure consistency with applicable city requirements. Thus, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 3.5
The City acknowledges the City of Perris's request to receive all future Project notices pursuant to CEQA and Title 7 of the California Government Code. The City of Perris will be added to the Project distribution list and will receive all subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearing notifications, and notices of determination associated with Plot Plan No. PLN22-0190.

The City of Menifee thanks the City of Perris for its thorough engagement in the environmental review process. The comments provided regarding traffic and transportation impacts, AB98 compliance, sensitive receptor buffers, and Industrial Good Neighbor Policy consistency have been carefully considered.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 884
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1514 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 4
COMMENTER: Harrison Beck, Staff Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity DATE: Unknown – Via Email
Response 4.1
This comment provides an introduction stating that the letter is submitted on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity and expresses concern that the Draft MND does not adequately analyze or mitigate the Project’s potential environmental impacts. The commenter requests that the city prepare an EIR for the Project.

The city acknowledges the commenter’s statement and appreciates the interest of the Center for Biological Diversity in the environmental review process. The comments regarding specific environmental issues raised in the letter are addressed in the responses provided throughout this document. As discussed in the Draft MND and supporting technical analyses, the City determined that the Project would not result in significant environmental impacts with implementation of the identified mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulations.

Response 4.2
The commenter states that the city must prepare an EIR for the Proposed Project based on the “fair argument” standard under CEQA and contends that the Project may result in significant impacts related to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and other environmental topics.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees with the assertion. The Draft MND prepared for the Project evaluated potential environmental impacts across all applicable resource areas, including air quality (Section 3), greenhouse gas emissions (Section 8), and noise (Section 13).

Based on the analysis presented in the Draft MND, the Project would not result in significant environmental impacts with implementation of the identified mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulations. Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are needed.

Response 4.3
The commenter states that the Draft MND inadequately analyzes the Project’s greenhouse gas emissions. The comment suggests that the Draft MND underestimates Project-related GHG emissions. The comment provides a summary of climate change impacts and legislation in the State of California, in addition to relevant case law pertaining to GHG analysis under CEQA. However, the comment serves to provide context to subsequent comments and does not raise any specific significant environmental issues with the Draft MND. Specific concerns are discussed in further detail in subsequent comments below.

Response 4.4
The commenter states that the Project’s GHG emissions are underestimated in the Draft MND, specifically with regard to transportation emissions. The comment indicates that the nearest major ports are approximately 80 miles from the Project site, and the Project’s warehouse use could Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 885
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1515 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
include truck travel to these ports. The comment suggests that trip length assumptions within the Draft MND should be supported by substantial evidence.

The comment also suggests that the Project’s Trip Generation Estimate Memorandum is unsubstantiated and that the Project’s trip generation rate is unverifiable with the information provided in the Draft MND. The commenter contends that the Project’s trip rate would be higher than what was analyzed, resulting in higher GHG emissions.

The comment also suggests that the Draft MND’s reference to CARB programs and policies pertaining to low-emission and zero-emission trucks places misplaced reliance on CARB regulations, thereby overestimating GHG reductions.

This comment has been acknowledged, and the analysis has been revised to utilize truck trip distances based on guidance from SCAQMD’s Rule 2305 Second Staff Report, which recommends the use of a 14.2 mile trip length for class 4-7 trucks (LHDT1/2 and MHDT) and 39.9 miles for class 8 trucks (HHDT). As such, a weighted average truck trip distance of 29.62 miles was utilized based on the assumed fleet mix. Additionally, it should be noted that these trip lengths are based on averages, and not all Project truck trips would be to port destinations, with many truck trips taking the form of local deliveries and other trips that would be significantly shorter.

With regard to the Project’s estimated trip generation, the Draft MND clearly references the Trip Generation Estimate Memorandum prepared by Translutions (2025). The trip generation estimates contained therein served as the basis for transportation-related emissions analysis in the Draft MND. The information provided in the MND is fully verifiable with the contents of the Project- specific Trip Generation Estimate Memorandum, the contents of which were prepared in accordance with industrywide standard practices and guidelines. The commenter’s speculation that trips may exceed the reported values is not supportable because the Project could equally as likely generate fewer trips than estimated.

With regard to the Draft MND’s reference to CARB programs, the commenter incorrectly asserts that the analysis is reliant upon CARB programs pertaining to electric truck sales. While these CARB programs are acknowledged in the analysis, they are not utilized to support any form of quantitative analysis and are not determinant factors in arriving at a significance conclusion. Nonetheless, given that these programs are aimed at sales of new vehicles, it can be ascertained that future vehicle fleet mixes would include some form of electric vehicles as the enforcement and development of these programs continue.

Response 4.5
The commenter states that the Project should implement mitigation measures to reduce operational GHG emissions. The commenter cites several examples of solar and solar offsetting programs used as mitigation for other projects in the SCAQMD region.

As noted by the commenter, the Project would include a 150 kilowatt solar array, thereby offsetting a portion of the Project’s onsite energy demand. While the provided examples of mitigation measures for other projects are noted, there is no mechanism within CEQA that would require the Project to implement such measures for this Project.

As discussed in Section 6, Energy, of the Draft MND, the Project would be required to comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which require newly constructed buildings to meet energy performance standards set by the CEC. These standards are specifically crafted for new buildings to result in energy efficient performance so that the buildings do not result in wasteful, Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 886
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1516 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Additionally, the Project would be served by SCE, which is required to increase its share of renewable energy procurement pursuant to SB 100 requirements. The City of Menifee, as the lead agency, has not adopted any regulations or policies mandating the use of onsite solar to offset a project’s entire electrical demand.

Pursuant to CEQA, mitigation measures are not part of the original Project design, but instead are actions taken by the lead agency to reduce impacts to the environment resulting from the original Project design (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126.4(a) and 15370.). As demonstrated in the Draft MND and subsequent revisions, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact with regard to GHG emissions. Therefore, additional mitigation is not required.

Response 4.6
The commenter provides a summary of warehouse uses and their capacity to generate air pollutant emissions. The commenter explains the types of pollutants emitted by warehouse uses and summarizes their health impacts on nearby communities.

Although the commenter introduces their concerns regarding the adequacy of the Draft MND, this comment is ultimately a summary of details provided within the main body of their letter. More detailed responses to each of the overarching topics raised by the commenter are addressed throughout Responses 4.7 and 4.8.

Response 4.7
The commenter claims that the Draft MND does not disclose assumptions that were made to estimate trip lengths for Project-related truck activity. Additionally, the comment asserts that the Draft MND failed to adequately analyze localized health impacts related to air pollutant emissions.

With regard to trip length assumptions, the Draft MND’s air quality analysis clearly indicates that operational trip lengths are based on model defaults from the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). CalEEMod trip lengths are based on regional data and land use types and are relied upon as standard practice when estimating Project emissions. Nonetheless, as discussed in Response 4.4, the analysis has been revised to conservatively utilize truck trip distances based on guidance from SCAQMD’s Rule 2305 Second Staff Report, which recommends the use of a 14.2 mile trip length for class 4-7 trucks (LHDT1/2 and MHDT) and 39.9 miles for class 8 trucks (HHDT).

Additionally, it should be noted that these trip lengths are based on averages, and not all Project truck trips would be to port destinations, with many truck trips taking the form of local deliveries and other trips that would be significantly shorter.

With regard to localized health impacts, an HRA was prepared by Rincon Consultants (2026) to quantify health impacts from both construction and operation of the Proposed Project. As shown therein, Project construction and operation would not exceed applicable health risk thresholds established by the SCAQMD. Given the results of this refined, quantitative analysis of health risk, it can be concluded that the Project would not result in significant health risk impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Accordingly, this impact determination supports the City’s preparation of an MND, rather than an EIR.

Response 4.8
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND inadequately evaluates potential emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) associated with Project-related truck traffic and contends that the analysis Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 887
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1517 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
improperly relies on guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook.

The reference to CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook was provided for general land use compatibility guidance and not as a regulatory threshold of significance. As discussed in Response

4.7 above, an HRA was prepared by Rincon Consultants (2026) to quantify health impacts from both construction and operation of the Proposed Project. As shown therein, Project construction and operation would not exceed applicable health risk thresholds established by the SCAQMD. Given the results of this refined, quantitative analysis of health risk, it can be concluded that Toxic Air Contaminants emitted by the Project would not result in significant health risk impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.

Response 4.9
The commenter asserts that the Project may result in significant air quality impacts and recommends preparation of an EIR and adoption of additional mitigation measures, including installation of on-site solar energy systems, requirements for electric vehicles and trucks, and off- site mitigation programs such as air filtration and community health programs.

The City of Menifee disagrees with the commenter’s assertion that mitigation must be imposed upon the Project to reduce air emissions. As discussed in responses 4.7 and 4.8 above, an HRA was prepared by Rincon Consultants (2026) to quantify health impacts from both construction and operation of the Proposed Project. As shown therein, Project construction and operation would not exceed applicable health risk thresholds established by the SCAQMD. The Project would result in less than significant air quality impacts and no mitigation is required pursuant to CEQA.

Response 4.10
The comment states that the Draft MND fails to adequately analyze Project-related noise impacts and contends that an EIR should be prepared.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees with the assertion. The Draft MND includes an analysis of potential construction and operational noise impacts based on established noise modeling methodologies and applicable City standards (Section 13 of the Draft MND). The analysis evaluated potential noise exposure at nearby sensitive receptors and determined that construction noise would be temporary and that operational noise levels would not exceed applicable thresholds. Based on the analysis presented in the Draft MND, Project-related noise impacts would be less than significant with compliance with applicable regulations and standards.

Therefore, preparation of an EIR is not required under CEQA, and no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are needed.

Response 4.11
The comment mentions that the Project could cause serious harm to people from excessive noise and that the Draft MND fails to acknowledge noise impacts to wildlife and biological resources. The commenter also asserts that the Draft MND does not adequately analyze these potential effects.

The Draft MND evaluated potential noise impacts associated with construction and operation of the Proposed Project using applicable City noise standards and commonly accepted noise analysis methodologies. Section 13, Noise, of the Draft MND determined that Project-related noise levels would not exceed applicable thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors and that construction noise Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 888
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1518 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
would be temporary in nature. With respect to biological resources, the Draft MND evaluated potential impacts to sensitive habitats and special-status species several times throughout the years. The Project Site is a previously disturbed area (gravel pit) within a developed setting. Due to the analysis in Section 4, Biological Resources, of the Draft MND, operational noise levels associated with the Project are not expected to substantially affect wildlife or sensitive species.

What’s more, the studies cited by the commenter address general effects of environmental noise but do not demonstrate that the Project would result in noise levels that exceed applicable standards or cause significant impacts.

Accordingly, the conclusions of the Draft MND remain unchanged, and no revisions to the environmental analysis are required.

Response 4.12
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND’s use of a three (3) dBA increase as a significance threshold for traffic noise is unsupported and that the analysis does not adequately account for the proportion of truck traffic associated with Project operations.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment for the record. The traffic noise analysis in the Draft MND utilized a three (3) dBA increase as a conservative screening threshold to identify potential substantial increases in traffic noise levels. This approach is commonly used in environmental noise analyses and is consistent with guidance used by many agencies to identify perceptible changes in community noise environments. Further, this threshold is considered the minimum change in noise level perceptible to the average human ear (Crocker 2007). The analysis compared existing and Project traffic volumes to determine whether the Project would substantially increase traffic noise levels along nearby roadways. Accordingly, the Draft MND appropriately evaluated potential traffic noise impacts, and the analysis demonstrates that traffic-related noise impacts would be less than significant. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are needed.

Response 4.13
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND does not adequately evaluate construction-related noise impacts, including analysis at the nearest sensitive receptors, the use of a fixed construction noise threshold, and the reliance on 8-hour Leq noise levels rather than maximum noise levels.

The construction noise analysis in the Draft MND evaluated representative sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Project Site using standard noise modeling methodologies and applicable city noise standards. As noted in Section 13, Noise, of the Draft MND, the nearest sensitive receptor is over 400-feet away in distance. The receptors analyzed in the Draft MND are representative of the nearest residential areas surrounding the Project Site, and the modeling approach provides a reasonable estimate of potential construction noise exposure. The analysis concluded that construction noise would be temporary in nature and would comply with applicable municipal code requirements governing construction hours and noise levels. As disclosed, construction activities would occur intermittently over the Project’s construction period and would not occur continuously at any specific location across the entire Project Site. The receptors analyzed in the Draft MND are representative of the nearest residential areas surrounding the Project Site, and the modeling approach provides a reasonable estimate of potential construction noise exposure. The use of equivalent noise levels is a commonly accepted methodology for evaluating construction noise under CEQA and is consistent with industry practice and local regulatory standards.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 889
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1519 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 4.14
The commenter recommends that the City adopt additional mitigation measures to reduce potential noise impacts associated with Project construction and operation, including installation of acoustical barriers, restrictions on nighttime truck activity, truck routing measures, and the use of electric trucks. The City of Menifee acknowledges the commenter’s recommended measures but does not agree with implementation of these measures. The Draft MND evaluated potential construction and operational noise impacts associated with the Proposed Project and concluded that noise impacts would be less than significant with compliance with applicable City standards and existing regulations. Because no significant noise impacts were identified, additional mitigation measures beyond those included in the Draft MND are not required under CEQA. Based on the analysis presented in the Draft MND, the Project would not result in significant noise impacts, and no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions are required.

Response 4.15
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND does not adequately evaluate water supply availability for the Proposed Project and raises concerns regarding groundwater conditions and potential climate change impacts.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment. As discussed in the Draft MND, water service for the Project would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). EMWD’s adopted Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) evaluates water supplies and Projected demands under normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry year conditions and demonstrates that sufficient supplies are available to serve anticipated growth within its service area. Based on the CalEEMod assumptions in the Draft MND, the Proposed Project’s estimated water demand is approximately 76,448,185 gallons per year (234.77 acre feet per year [AFY]). According to the UWMP projections, 2045 water demand in the city is anticipated to be 251,500 AFY and 2045 supply is 251,500 AFY under normal year conditions. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s water demand would represent less than 0.001 percent of the City’s anticipated water demand in 2045. It should be noted that the Project’s estimated water demand represents a small portion of EMWD’s available supply and is consistent with regional growth Projections evaluated in the UWMP. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 4.16
The commenter urges the city to prepare an EIR for the Proposed Project and references potential legal remedies to ensure compliance with CEQA. The commenter also requests that the city maintain and preserve all documents and communications related to the Project that may form part of the administrative record.

The city recognizes the comment and has noted it for the record. The city will continue to maintain Project-related documents in accordance with applicable CEQA requirements. The commenter’s request to be included on the Project notification list has been noted. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment and their previous comments in Responses 4.1 through 4.15.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 890
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1520 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 891
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1521 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 5
COMMENTER: Sam Wang, Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR, South Coast Air Quality Management District
DATE: November 5, 2025
Response 5.1
The commenter provides a summary of the Proposed Project and surrounding context based on the Draft MND, including the Project location, site characteristics, proposed warehouse development, and construction schedule. The city acknowledges the commenter’s summary of the Project information. The description of the Project provided in the comment letter reflects the information presented in the Draft MND regarding the Project Site, proposed warehouse development, associated improvements, and construction timeline. The comment does not raise a specific concern or request revisions to the environmental analysis. Therefore, no changes to the Project description or environmental analysis in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.2
The commenter indicates that the CalEEMod operational analysis prepared for the Project assumes an average trip length of approximately 16.4 miles per truck. The commenter states that given the Project’s distance from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the analysis likely underestimates mobile-source emissions by assuming a shorter average trip length that does not reflect potential truck travel to the aforementioned ports. The commenter recommends applying a more conservative assumption for vehicle trip lengths and trip rates.

The comment states that the truck trip length is not appropriate given the proposed Project’s distance from the Ports of Los Angles. This comment has been acknowledged, and the analysis has been revised to utilize truck trip distances based on guidance from SCAQMD’s Rule 2305 Second Staff Report, which recommends the use of a 14.2 mile trip length for class 4-7 trucks (LHDT1/2 and MHDT) and 39.9 miles for class 8 trucks (HHDT). As such, a weighted average truck trip distance of

29.62 miles was utilized based on the assumed fleet mix. Additionally, it should be noted that these trip lengths are based on averages, and not all Project truck trips would be to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, with many truck trips taking the form of local deliveries and other trips that would be significantly shorter.

Response 5.3
The commenter states that the SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) methodology is only applicable for Projects smaller than five acres. The commenter indicates that the use of such methodology is inappropriate for the Project because the Project site size is 17 acres. The commenter states that the use of LST methodology may underestimate localized air quality impacts, and recommends that the Lead Agency conduct site-specific dispersion modeling to accurately assess localized impacts from construction and operational phases of the Project.

According to the SCAQMD’s LST methodology, the use of LSTs is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local public agencies as a lead agency pursuant to CEQA. The City acknowledges the record. The City has accepted SCAQMD’s recommendation to conduct air dispersion modeling in a Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 892
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1522 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
refined HRA, as indicated in responses 4.7 and 4.8, above. No revisions to the impact conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.4
The commenter states that the Project description in the Draft MND does not specify whether the Project would include cold storage. The commenter notes that cold storage warehouses typically utilize trucks with Transport Refrigeration Units (TRUs), which result in higher emissions than unrefrigerated trucks.

The City of Menifee confirmed that the Project would not include allocated warehouse land for cold storage. Therefore, this comment does not require revisions to the air quality analysis. No revisions to the impact conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.5
The commenter states that SCAQMD staff have identified a freight railroad adjacent to the Project site. The commenter indicates that the Draft MND should indicate whether transportation by railroad would be utilized for the Project.

The City of Menifee confirms that the Project would not utilize the nearby freight railroads. No revisions to the impact conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.6
The commenter states that the Draft MND fails to adequately evaluate potential health risk impacts associated with increased emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) from operation of the Project.

The commenter states that these emissions should be evaluated quantitatively using a Project- specific HRA.

The City acknowledges the comment for the record. As indicated in responses 4.7, 4.8, and 5.3 above, an HRA was prepared by Rincon Consultants (2026) to quantify health impacts from both construction and operation of the Proposed Project. As shown therein, Project construction and operation would not exceed applicable health risk thresholds established by the SCAQMD. Given the results of this refined, quantitative analysis of health risk, it can be concluded that the Project would not result in significant health risk impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. No revisions to the impact conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.7
The commenter states that in the event of significant adverse air quality impacts from the Project, feasible mitigation measures should be implemented. The commenter lists several recommended measures pertaining to mobile sources, area sources, and localized risk considerations.

The City acknowledges the comment for the record. However, given the findings of the Draft MND and the subsequent HRA prepared for the Project, air quality impacts would be less than significant and would not necessitate the imposition of mitigation measures.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 893
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1523 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Response 5.8
The commenter requests clarification regarding whether an emergency standby diesel generator would be installed as part of Project operations and recommends that associated emissions be included in the operational air quality and GHG analyses if applicable.

The City of Menifee confirms that the Proposed Project may include portable generators for construction purposes only and included this within its construction related air quality and noise impacts. A generator is not proposed as part of Project operations. No revisions to the impact conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 5.9
The commenter notes that certain stationary or portable equipment associated with the Proposed Project (e.g., emergency generators, fire pumps, or boilers) may require permits from the SCAQMD and recommends that the CEQA document discuss applicable SCAQMD rules and the agency’s potential role as a Responsible Agency.

The city acknowledges that if the Project includes equipment subject to SCAQMD permitting requirements, the Project applicant would be required to obtain the appropriate permits and comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations, as applicable. Compliance with these regulatory requirements would occur during Project permitting and operation.

The commenter’s recommendations are noted; however, the environmental analysis presented in the Draft MND adequately evaluates the Project’s potential air quality and greenhouse gas impacts.

Therefore, no revisions to the impact conclusions are required.

Response 5.10
The commenter recommends that the city revise the CEQA analysis to address the comments provided and ensure that sufficient information is included in the Final CEQA document. The commenter also notes the City of Menifee’s responsibilities under CEQA to consider comments received during the public review process and to provide written responses prior to adoption of the Final MND.

The city acknowledges the comment for the record. Consistent with the requirements of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines, the City of Menifee has reviewed and considered all comments received during the public review period and has prepared written responses included in this Final MND. Public agencies that submitted comments will be notified of any scheduled public hearings in accordance with CEQA requirements. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 894
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1524 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 6
COMMENTER: Janki Patel, Local Development Review – Division of Transportation Planning, California Department of Transportation
DATE: November 6, 2025
Response 6.1
The commenter provides a summary of the Proposed Project and notes that the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Local Development Review Branch has reviewed the Draft MND. The commenter also notes that improvements near the SR-74 and Watson Road intersection may require signalization and that the Project would be required to obtain a Caltrans Encroachment Permit.

The City of Menifee acknowledges Caltrans’ review and appreciates the summary and preliminary comments provided. The Project applicant will be required to coordinate with Caltrans regarding any improvements within the State right-of-way and to obtain all necessary permits, including a Caltrans Encroachment Permit, prior to construction of any improvements that may affect State transportation facilities.

The Draft MND evaluated potential transportation impacts associated with the Proposed Project and determined that the Project would not result in significant transportation impacts. Any roadway or intersection improvements required by Caltrans would be addressed through the encroachment permit process and final engineering design. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 6.2
The commenter recommends that the city include a condition of approval requiring installation of a traffic signal at the SR-74 and Watson Road intersection to address potential increases in traffic associated with the Project.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment and appreciates Caltrans’ review of the Project.

The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Project evaluated traffic conditions at the SR-74 and Watson Road intersection and identified potential improvements that may be required to maintain acceptable operating conditions and safety. Any improvements within the State right-of-way, including signalization, would be subject to review and approval by Caltrans through the encroachment permit process.

The Project applicant will be required to coordinate with Caltrans and obtain all necessary approvals prior to construction of improvements affecting State facilities. Implementation of any required improvements would be addressed during final engineering design and permitting. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required because of this comment.

Response 6.3
The commenter provides recommendations related to the Traffic Impact Analysis, including installation of a traffic signal at the SR-74 and Watson Road intersection, use of the Caltrans Transportation Impact Study Guide for VMT screening, evaluation of ramp intersections at I-215 and Ethanac Road, and inclusion of a queuing analysis.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 895
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1525 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City of Menifee acknowledges the comments and appreciates Caltrans’ review of the Project. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared and attached as an Appendix to the Draft MND for the Proposed Project that evaluated Project-generated traffic and potential impacts to the surrounding roadway network. The analysis determined that the Project would not result in significant transportation impacts. The traffic signal at Watson Road and SR-74 is not required under opening year conditions. The intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C and signal warrants are not met under opening year conditions. As the city is the lead agency for the Proposed Project, the VMT screening evaluation has been conducted using the city's Guidelines. As detailed in the Draft MND, the Project falls within a low VMT area. Also, the Proposed Project is anticipated to add less than 50 trips to the I-215/Ethanac Road ramps. Therefore, the evaluation of the ramps are not required based on the guidelines.

In addition, a queueing analysis has been prepared to respond to this comment and others and is attached as Appendix C to this Final MND. Nonetheless, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 6.4
The commenter notes that any Project-related work affecting Caltrans facilities must comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. The commenter also states that any work within Caltrans right-of-way would require a Caltrans Encroachment Permit.

The city acknowledges the comment and appreciates Caltrans’ review. The Project will be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, including ADA accessibility requirements. Bicycle and pedestrian access would be maintained in accordance with applicable traffic control and construction standards during Project construction. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 6.5
The commenter thanks the city for the opportunity to review the Draft MND and provides contact information for the Caltrans Local Development Review Branch for future coordination. The city acknowledges the comment and appreciates Caltrans’ participation in the environmental review process. The contact information provided by the commenter has been noted for future coordination and Project notifications. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 896
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1526 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 7
COMMENTER: Steven Piepkorn, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance DATE: Unknown
Response 7.1
The commenter summarizes prior comments submitted by the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA), including a comment letter dated November 4, 2025, and technical review comments prepared by Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE). The commenter asserts that the Draft MND contains deficiencies related to air quality analysis, cumulative impacts, Project description, and alleged Project segmentation.

The city acknowledges the commenter’s concerns and has reviewed the referenced comment letter and technical materials. The issues raised regarding air quality analysis, Project description, cumulative impacts, and Project segmentation are addressed in the responses to comments contained in this Final MND. As discussed in the Draft MND and supporting technical analyses, the Project’s potential environmental impacts were evaluated using accepted methodologies and applicable regulatory thresholds. Accordingly, the city finds that the Draft MND provides an adequate environmental analysis under CEQA. This comment does not necessitate any changes to the environmental analysis or conclusions presented in the Draft MND.

Response 7.2
The commenter provides a summary of environmental burden and vulnerability in the Project region. The commenter argues that the Draft MND insufficiently analyzed the Project’s cumulative impacts with regard to localized air pollutant emissions.

The Draft MND analysis of cumulative air quality impacts is based on the SCAQMD’s established guidelines from their CEQA Air Quality Handbook and the White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. According to these recommendations, individual projects under SCAQMD’s jurisdiction would cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for which the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) is in non-attainment if the project exceeds SCAQMD’s recommended thresholds. As shown in Draft MND Section 3, Air Quality, specifically under Impact AQ-2, the construction and operation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional thresholds. Additionally, as discussed in responses 4.7 and 4.8 and shown in the HRA prepared for the Project, construction and operation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD health risk thresholds for cancer and chronic risk. While the SCAQMD is in the process of reviewing and updating cumulative thresholds, there are no current numeric or qualitative cumulative thresholds adopted for use within the SCAQMD’s jurisdictional area.

Response 7.3
The commenter asserts that the Project has been improperly “piecemealed” into separate environmental documents for site preparation and building construction and contends that the city should have evaluated these activities as a single Project.

The City of Menifee acknowledges the comment but disagrees that the environmental review improperly segments the Project. Please see Response 2.3, above, for more information. No Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 897
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1527 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 7.4
The commenter asserts that the Proposed Project contributes to a broader pattern of environmental injustice related to the concentration of warehouse and logistics facilities in the region and states that the Draft MND does not adequately analyze cumulative impacts associated with industrial development.

The city acknowledges the commenters’ concerns regarding environmental justice and cumulative development patterns in the region. The Draft MND evaluated the Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts, including air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation, using accepted methodologies and applicable regulatory thresholds. The analysis determined that Project-related impacts would be less than significant with implementation of identified mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulations.

The Draft MND also includes a cumulative impact analysis that considers the effects of other past, present, and reasonably near future Projects in the surrounding area, consistent with CEQA requirements. Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required.

Response 7.5
The commenter asserts that the Project contributes to a pattern of warehouse development in the region that may disproportionately affect nearby communities and contends that the Draft MND does not adequately evaluate cumulative impacts associated with multiple warehouse facilities.

The city acknowledges the commenter’s concerns regarding regional warehouse development and environmental justice considerations. The Draft MND evaluates the Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts, including air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation, using accepted methodologies and applicable regulatory thresholds established by agencies such as the SCAQMD. The analysis concluded that the Project’s construction and operational emissions and other environmental effects would be less than significant. Consistent with CEQA requirements, the Draft MND also evaluates cumulative impacts by considering the incremental contribution of the Project together with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future Projects in the surrounding area. The analysis determined that the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would not be cumulatively considerable.

Added, these statements do not demonstrate that the Proposed Project would result in significant environmental impacts under CEQA. Accordingly, no revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 7.6
The commenter asserts that the MND underestimates potential health risks and references a technical review prepared by SWAPE, alleging that the air quality analysis uses outdated assumptions and underestimates emissions.

The city acknowledges the comment and has reviewed the referenced technical materials. The air quality and health risk analyses in the Draft MND and Final MND, respectively, were prepared using Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 898
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1528 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
the CalEEMod model and methodologies consistent with SCAQMD guidance. The analysis evaluated construction and operational emissions and compared them to applicable significance thresholds.

The results demonstrate that Project-related emissions and health risks would remain below applicable thresholds. Issues related to grading activities and Project segmentation are addressed in other responses within this Final MND. Accordingly, the environmental analysis is adequate under CEQA, and no revisions to the conclusions are required.

Response 7.7
The commenter recommends that the Planning Commission reject the Draft MND and require preparation of an EIR. The city acknowledges the comment but disagrees that preparation of an EIR is required. The Draft MND evaluated potential environmental impacts associated with the Project using accepted methodologies and applicable regulatory thresholds. The analysis determined that Project-related impacts would be less than significant with implementation of identified mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulations. No revisions to the environmental analysis or conclusions in the Draft MND are required as a result of this comment.

Response 7.8
The commenter asserts that the Draft MND is flawed and requests that the city prepare and circulate a full EIR for the Proposed Project.

The city acknowledges these concerns. However, the Draft MND determined that potential environmental impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures and compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

The environmental analysis was conducted in accordance with the CEQA, applicable guidelines, and accepted technical methodologies. The comment has been noted for the record, and no changes to the Draft MND are required in response to this comment.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 899
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1529 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Letter 8
COMMENTER: Jackie Vega, Urban Regional Planner I, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission
DATE: August 3, 2022
Response 8.1
The commenter states that the Project Site is located within Zone D of the March Air Reserve Base Airport Influence Area and indicates that review by the Airport Land Use Commission is not required because the city has adopted and is consistent with the March Air Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The commenter also notes that no legislative action appears to be proposed as part of the Project.

The City acknowledges this comment and appreciates the clarification. The Project Site is located within Zone D of the March AIA, and the City of Menifee is an ALUCP-consistent jurisdiction authorized to conduct compatibility reviews for Projects within this zone. No legislative actions are proposed as part of the Project. This comment is informational in nature and does not require revisions to the Draft MND.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 900
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1530 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project Responses to Comments on the Draft MND

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

This page intentionally left blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 901
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1531 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
This section of the Final MND contains the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 902
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1532 of 3153

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Project City of Menifee
Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 April 2026
Section 3 - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Matrix Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
Impact – Biological Resources
BIO-1: Direct and Indirect Impacts During Construction
Consistent with the Best Management Practices from MSHCP Volume 1, Attachment C, the following shall be implemented to avoid direct and indirect impacts during construction:
o Limiting grading to the minimum area necessary for construction, operation, and decommissioning of the project
o Limiting vegetation disturbance/removal to the maximum extent practicable
o Implementing fiber rolls and sandbags around drainage areas and the site perimeter
o Stockpiling and disposing of demolition debris, concrete, and soil properly o Installation of a stabilized construction entrance/exit and stabilization of disturbed areas
o Proper protections for fueling and maintenance of equipment and vehicles o Managing waste, aggressively controlling litter, and implementing sediment controls
o Soil stabilization in disturbed areas by revegetation Minimize Spills of Hazardous Materials. All vehicles and equipment shall be maintained in proper condition to minimize the potential for fugitive emissions of motor oil, antifreeze, hydraulic fluid, grease, or other hazardous materials. Hazardous spills and contaminated soil shall be immediately cleaned up and the contaminated soil shall be properly handled or disposed of at a licensed facility. Servicing of construction equipment shall take place only at a designated staging area.

Invasive Plant Species Control. Invasive plant species, for the purpose of this document, shall include all species with a California Invasive Plant Council (Cal -IPC) rating of limited, moderate, or high. Construction personnel and equipment shall be Prior to issuance of grading or
building permits submittal of plans
with measure on plans, collection of
acknowledgement by owner and
notice to contractors; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 903
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1533 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
free of invasive plant seeds, propagules, and any material which may contain them (e.g., soil) prior to entering the Project Site. All potentially contaminated equipment will be carefully cleaned prior to the initiation of project activities. Staging areas and temporary work areas shall avoid weed infestations and infestations within the work area(s) shall be flagged and avoided to the maximum extent feasible. Only certified weed-free materials (e.g., gravel, straw, and fill) will be used for the project.

Removal of Native Vegetation. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species.

Standard Dust Control Measures. Standard dust control measures as per the South Coast Air Quality Management District shall be implemented to reduce dust impacts on nearby conserved lands, plants, and wildlife. Measures include controlling speed to 15 mph or less on unpaved roads, replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as possible, frequently watering active work sites, installation of shaker plates, and suspending excavation and grading operations during periods of high winds.

Wildlife Hazards. The following measures shall be implemented to ensure that wildlife do not become trapped, entangled, injured, or poisoned by construction activities:
o Structures in which wildlife may become trapped (e.g., open pipes, pits, trenches, etc.) shall be tightly covered at the end of each work day. If covering the structure is not possible, an escape ramp shall be provided to allow any wildlife that falls in to safely escape.
o Debris piles, construction materials, equipment, and other items that may be used as wildlife refuge shall be inspected for wildlife at the start of each work day and prior to disturbance. If wildlife is discovered, it shall either be moved out of harm’s way by a qualified biologist or allowed to move off of the study area on its own.
o Nets and mesh shall be made of loose-weave material that is not fused at the intersections of the weave, as nets with welded weaves present an entanglement risk.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 904
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1534 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
o Toxic materials and garbage shall be removed from the work site and safely stored or disposed of at the end of each workday.

BIO-2: Worker Environmental Awareness Plan Training
Prior to the initiation of the Project, an approved biologist shall present Worker Environmental Awareness Plan training (WEAP) to all on-site personnel. The WEAP will educate the personnel on the identification of special-status species and regulated biological resources that are present or have the potential to occur within the Project Site, will cover the applicable regulatory policies and provisions regarding their protection, and will provide an overview of the project’s avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Furthermore, on-site personnel will be briefed on the reporting process if an inadvertent injury or mortality should occur to a special-status species during construction or operations.

Prior to issuance of grading or
building permits submittal of plans
with measure on plans, collection of
acknowledgement by owner and
notice to contractors; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
BIO-3: Pre-Construction Nesting Birds Survey
To avoid disturbance of nesting birds, including special-status bird species and birds protected by the Migratory Bird Species Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC Section 3503), project activities shall occur outside of the breeding season for nesting birds (generally February 1 through August 31), if feasible.

If construction occurs during the breeding season, then a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than seven days prior to the initiation of Project activities. If more than one phase of grading occurs during nesting season, the pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be repeated. The nesting bird survey shall be conducted on foot inside the Project Site and include a 500-foot buffer for raptors and special status bird species and a 100-foot buffer for all other bird species. The survey shall be conducted by a biologist familiar with avian species known to inhabit Southern California. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer of up to 500 feet for raptors and special-status species and up to 100 feet for non-raptors (dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land use outside of the workspace) shall be determined and Prior to project approval: verify that
the applicant has conducted surveys
and searches of databases and
records and as needed, identified
methods to avoid impacts to
significant paleontological resources;
measures on plans.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 905
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1535 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
demarcated by the biologist with construction fencing, flagging, or other means to mark the boundary. The buffer shall be maintained and nest avoided until the young have fledged and/or the nest is no longer active.

Impact – Cultural Resources
CUL-1: Human Remains
If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

During grading/construction: field as
needed, field verify that work is
halted to assess possible resources
and avoidance buffers are
demarcated and enforced; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
CUL-2: Inadvertent Archaeological Find
If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed.

Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s). a) All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find. b) At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community During grading/construction: field as
needed, field verify that work is
halted to assess possible resources
and avoidance buffers are
demarcated and enforced; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 906
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1536 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c) Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. d) Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non-Disclosure of Reburial Condition. e) Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources.

If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

Geology and Soils
GEO-1: Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program Qualified Professional Paleontologist. Prior to excavation, the Proposed Project applicant shall retain a Qualified Professional Paleontologist, as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP 2010), who shall direct all mitigation measures related to paleontological resources. The Qualified Professional Prior to project approval: verify that
the applicant has conducted surveys
and searches of databases and
records and as needed, identified
methods to avoid impacts to
significant paleontological resources;
Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 907
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1537 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
Paleontologist shall obtain a written repository agreement for the curation of any fossils discovered during paleontological monitoring prior to the beginning of ground disturbance.

Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program. Prior to the start of construction, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist or their designee shall conduct a paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training for construction personnel regarding the appearance of fossils and the procedures for notifying paleontological staff should construction personnel discover fossils.

Paleontological Monitoring and Salvage. Full-time paleontological monitoring shall be conducted during ground-disturbing construction activities (e.g., grading, trenching, drilling) within previously undisturbed sediments. Paleontological monitoring shall be conducted by a paleontological monitor with experience with collection and salvage of paleontological resources and who meets the minimum standards of the SVP (2010) for a Paleontological Resources Monitor. Paleontological monitors will be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens in a timely manner. The Qualified Professional Paleontologist may recommend that monitoring be reduced in frequency or ceased entirely based on geologic observations. Such decisions shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Menifee.

Particularly small invertebrate fossils typically represent multiple specimens of a limited number of organisms, and a scientifically suitable sample can be obtained from one to several five-gallon buckets of fossiliferous sediment. If it is possible to dry screen the sediment in the field, a concentrated sample may consist of one or two buckets of material. For vertebrate fossils, the test is usually the observed presence of small pieces of bones within the sediments. If present, as multiple five - gallon buckets of sediment can be collected and returned to a separate facility to wet-screen the sediment.

In the event of a fossil discovery by the paleontological monitor or construction personnel, all construction activity within 50 feet of the find shall cease, and the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall evaluate the find. If the fossil(s) is (are) measures on plans.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 908
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1538 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
not scientifically significant, then construction activity may resume. If it is determined that the fossil(s) is (are) scientifically significant, the following shall be completed:
• Fossil Salvage. The paleontological monitor shall salvage (excavate and recover) the fossil to protect it from damage/destruction. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontological monitor with minimal disruption to construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In these cases, a fossil recovery crew shall excavate around the find, encase the find within a plaster and burlap jacket, and remove it after the plaster is set. For large fossils, use of the contractor’s construction equipment may be solicited to help remove the jacket to a safe location.
• Fossil Preparation and Curation. Fossils shall be identified to the lowest (most-specific) possible taxonomic level, prepared to a curation-ready condition, and curated in a scientific institution with a permanent paleontological collection along with all pertinent field notes, photos, data, and maps. Fossils of undetermined significance at the time of collection may also warrant curation at the discretion of the Qualified Professional Paleontologist.

Final Paleontological Mitigation Report. Upon completion of ground-disturbing activities (or laboratory preparation and curation of fossils, if necessary), the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall prepare a final report describing the results of the paleontological monitoring efforts. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods employed; an overview of project geology; and, if fossils were discovered, an analysis of the fossils, including physical description, taxonomic identification, scientific significance and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record their original location(s). The report shall be submitted to the City of Menifee and, if fossil curation occurred, the designated scientific institution.

Impact – Transportation
TRA-1: Intersection 5: Trumble Road and Ethanac Road Prior to issuance of grading or Applicant for City of Menifee, Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 909
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1539 of 3153

City of Menifee
Trumble and Watson Project

Final Mitigated Negative Declaration

Mitigation Measure
Monitoring Phase and
Monitoring Actions1
Implementing
Party
Enforcement
and Monitoring
Entity
The Applicant shall pay its fair share obligation towards adding one eastbound through lane, one westbound through lane, one dedicated westbound right turn lane, one northbound left turn lane, one dedicated northbound right turn lane, and one dedicated southbound right turn lane. As stated earlier, since the trips added by the project at this intersection are more than 50 during the peak hours and the delay added by the Project is more than two seconds, the impact at this intersection is considered to be an indirect impact before implementation of the aforementioned through lanes. In particular, the project’s fair share is 2.71%. building permits submittal of plans
with measure on plans, collection of
acknowledgement by owner and
notice to contractors; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.
individual
project
Community
Development
Department
TRA-2: Intersection 6: Watson Road and Highway 74
The Applicant pay its fair share towards implementation of a traffic signal at the Watson Road and Highway 74 intersection. However, since the trips added by the Project at this intersection are less than 50 during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours, the impact at this intersection is not considered to be a cumulative impact. Nonetheless, in order to reduce impacts from the project to a less than significant level, the Project’s fair share cost towards development of that signal shall be 0.93%.

Prior to issuance of grading or
building permits submittal of plans
with measure on plans, collection of
acknowledgement by owner and
notice to contractors; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Impact – Tribal Cultural Resources (See Cultural Resources) CUL 1 through CUL-2 Prior to issuance of grading or
building permits submittal of plans
with measure on plans, collection of
acknowledgement by owner and
notice to contractors; subject to
inspection by CDD; enforcement of
violations available through MMC at
City discretion.

Applicant for
individual
project
City of Menifee,
Community
Development
Department
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 910
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1540 of 3153

MITIGATION MONITORINGAND REPORTING PROGRAM
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Project City of Menifee
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 March 2026
This page intentionally left blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 911
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1541 of 3153

Final MND
Appendix A
EXHIBIT "D"
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 912
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1542 of 3153

STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
320 WEST 4TH STREET, SUITE 500, LOS ANGELES, CA 90013

October 27, 2025 ENVR 20251000008

Russell Brown
Senior Planner
City of Menifee
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, CA 92584

Re: Trumble and Watson Warehouse - Plot Plan No. PLN22-0190 SCH 2025100303 – Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)

Dear Russell Brown,

The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission/CPUC) has jurisdiction over rail crossings (crossings) in California. The CPUC ensures that crossings are safely designed, constructed, and maintained. The Commission’s Rail Crossings Engineering Branch (RCEB) is in receipt of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Trumble and Watson Warehouse - Plot Plan No. PLN22 - 0190 Project. The City of Menifee (City) is the lead agency.

The project site is located at 25675 Trumble Road in the City of Menifee. The proposed project will include a 328,227 square foot warehouse building (inclusive of 15,000 square feet of office space) along with 33 dock-high doors. The project consists of 126 trailer parking spaces and 296 automobile parking spaces. Access to the site would be provided by two driveways off Trumble Road. Additional improvements include site/parking lot landscaping, on-site walls and fencing, onsite infrastructure and construction of frontage and associated roadway improvements.

The site can be accessed from two routes, one of which crosses the Watson Road at-grade highway-rail crossing (DOT# 027354X, CPUC# 101PV-86.79) on the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Perris Valley Subdivision. The Watson Road at-grade highway-rail crossing consists of a 2-lane roadway with passive railroad warning devices.

The City should investigate the impact of increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic through the at-grade highway-rail crossing and any necessary supplemental measures to mitigate this increase, such as but not limited to; the installation of active railroad warning devices, installation of concrete track panels, repaving of Watson Road, signalization of the intersection of Hwy 74 and Watson Rd, reprofiling the approaches to the crossing to reduce the steep grade north of the crossing, and installation of street lighting at the crossing. The City should also consider other mitigations, such as closing the crossing or relocating the crossing further north to better accommodate turn radii and improve the available line of sight for approaching trains. Additionally, mitigations should be provided along Watson Road to prevent vehicles from parking on the SCRRA right-of-way and near the existing tracks. These measures can be accomplished through a capital project funded by the City or a condition of approval for the development, and should also bring the crossings up to current standards and in compliance with ADA requirements.

Any proposed crossing modifications will require authorization from the CPUC through a General Order 88-B request and must also conform to the goals of the CPUC’s Environmental and Social Justice

1 2
3 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 913
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1543 of 3153

Russell Brown
ENVR 20251000008
October 27, 2025

Action Plan. This includes improving safety and access to transportation, improving local air quality and public health, and expanding outreach and public participation opportunities in disadvantaged communities. For more information, please visit https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/esjactionplan.

RCEB staff is available to discuss any potential safety impacts or concerns at the crossings and address any questions from the City.

If you have any questions, please contact Sergio Licon at (213) 503-4866, or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Anh Truong, PE
Senior Utilities Engineer (Supervisor)
Rail Crossings Engineering Branch
Rail Safety Division

cc: State Clearinghouse, [email protected] Maria Leible, Metrolink, [email protected]
Ryan Luckert, Rincon, [email protected]
Brad Kritzer, Crosland Barnes Group, [email protected] 3 4
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 914
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1544 of 3153

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
10250 CONSTELLATION BOULEVARD
SUITE 2300
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
(213) 572-0400

November 4, 2025
Russell Brown Via Email to:

AICP, Senior Planner [email protected] City of Menifee, Planning Department
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, CA 92586

Subject: Comments on Trumble and Watson Warehouse - Plot Plan No. PLN22-0190 MND (SCH NO. 2025100303)

Dear Mr. Brown,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Trumble and Watson Warehouse - Plot Plan No. PLN22-0190 Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary
The project proposes the construction and operation of a single 328,227 square foot (sf) industrial warehouse building (inclusive of 15,000 square feet of office space) on a 17.19 acre site near the southeast corner of Watson Road and Trumble Road. The building includes 33 dock-high (truck/trailer loading access) doors and the site provides a total of 422 parking spaces, inclusive of 296 passenger car parking spaces and 126 truck/trailer parking spaces. 1 2
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 915
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1545 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

2 Project Piecemealing
The MND does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” ( CEQA § 15378). The proposed project is a piecemealed portion of a larger overall project to be developed by Lovett Industrial within the City.

The MND misleads the public and decision makers by circumventing adequate and accurate environmental analysis for the whole of the action - construction and operation of all Lovett Industrial buildings as a whole. At minimum, piecemealed projects include the development of the Northern Gateway Logistics Center Project 1 (398,252 sf of warehouse/industrial building area).

Cumulatively, the proposed project and the piecemealed project will construct 726,479 sf of warehouse/industrial building area.

The project has also been piecemealed into two distinct phases - a site preparation phase and a development phase. The MND states that, “The Project Site, formerly known as the Trumble Pit Site (or Trumble Road Open Pit), was originally operated as an open pit mine and soil hauling (import and export) facility and has, most recently, been used as a soil and concrete recycling area,” and that, “…the County of Riverside approved a Surface Mining Permit (SMP 190) and adopted an environmental assessment (Environmental Assessment 36362) for the mining operations. The Surface Mining Permit was voided in 2003 primarily due to the operator’s failure to provide financial assurance for the reclamation of the mine.” The timeline for project piecemealing activities is as follows:

1. October 24, 2018: Menifee Planning Commission2 approves MND for Grading Permit No. 17- 087R (Planning Case No. 2017-361) (5,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 207,000 cy of fill generating 25,250 truck hauling trips (2018 MND3)).

1 https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2021110379/4
2 https://cityofmenifee.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=5059 3 https://cityofmenifee.primegov.com/meeting/attachment/38957.pdf?name=Attachment-3595 3 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 916
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1546 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

3 2. Grading Permit No. 22-0190 (additional 500 cy of cut and 239,000 cy of fill) submitted in 2022 to generate entitlement number GP 22-0190.

3. Proposed Project: Submitted in 2022 to generate entitlement number PLN 22-0190.

4. March 8, 2023: Menifee Planning Commission 4 approves MND for Grading Permit No. 22- 0190 (additional 500 cy of cut and 239,000 cy of fill generating 25,250 truck hauling trips (2023 MND5)).

Total Site Preparation Earthwork Quantities:
5,500 cy of cut material
446,000 cy of fill material

Total Truck Hauling Trips: 50,500

Overall, the MND has not analyzed the whole of the action, which includes the required site preparation activities and associated 50,500 truck hauling trips. The proposed project has been piecemealed into two distinctly separate phases in order to present unduly low environmental impacts. At minimum, the application for PLN 22-0190 and Grading Permit No. 22-0190 were both submitted in 2022 and it is probably they were submitted simultaneously to generate similar entitlement numbers. Both projects were known to the Lead Agency and project proponent at the time of environmental analysis and a Project EIR must be prepared to include analysis of the whole of the action, including all site preparation activities, construction, and operation of the proposed project.

CEQA Section 15161 describes project EIRs as examining “the environmental impacts of a specific development project. This type of EIR should focus primarily on the changes in the environment that would result from the development project. The EIR shall examine all phases of the project including planning, construction, and operation.” The specific development project is

4 https://cityofmenifee.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=10257 5 https://files.ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/285351-
1/attachment/pLbu3rjO2SZ9hr_hRQtHb0cvvCnzlXq6gvliLKWbjXrHRo- ckAynIxZyorTMCUtFi6CT_XnyaQ88M1y_0
3 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 917
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1547 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

4 the construction and operation of all Lovett Industrial buildings as a whole, and all site preparation work required to construct such buildings.

Additionally, CEQA Section 15146 requires that the degree of specificity in an EIR “ will correspond to the degree of specificity involved in the underlying activity which is described in the EIR. (a) An EIR on a construction project will necessarily be more detailed in the specific effects of the project than will be an EIR on the adoption of a local general plan or comprehensive zoning ordinance because the effects of the construction can be predicted with greater accuracy.” Because there are at least two developments and significant site preparation work as part of a single construction project, the project EIR must be more detailed in the specific effects of the project. A project EIR must be prepared which accurately represents the whole of the action without piecemealing the project into separate, smaller development projects or phases to present unduly low environmental impacts. An EIR must comply with CEQA § 15161 by preparing a Project EIR to adequately and accurately disclose the project-specific and cumulative impacts of all proposed Lovett Industrial projects and site preparation required to construct such projects.

Project Description
The MND does not include a detailed site plan, floor plan, grading plan, or building elevations for the proposed project. The basic components of a Planning Application include a site plan, floor plan, grading plan, elevations, and written narrative. The site plan provided in the appendices do not provide any detailed information such as the earthwork quantity notes, parking requirements, site coverage, floor area ratio, etc. and are illegible/blurry. The MND has excluded these required application items from public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as these documents contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. An EIR must be prepared to include a legible, wholly accurate detailed site plan, floor plan, grading plan, and building elevations.

3. Air Quality, 6. Energy, and 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. This is in conflict with 3 4
5 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 918
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1548 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

5 CEQA Guidelines Section 15131 (c), which requires that “Economic, social, and particularly housing factors shall be considered by public agencies together with technological and environmental factors in deciding whether changes in a project are feasible to reduce or avoid the significant effects on the environment identified in the EIR. If information on these factors is not contained in the EIR, the information must be added to the record in some other manner to allow the agency to consider the factors in reaching a decision on the project.” This is especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. See also the attached air quality comments and analysis from SWAPE.

According to CalEnviroScreen 4.06, CalEPA’s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project ’s census tract (6065042731) is highly burdened by pollution. The surrounding community bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on several pollution indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract ranks in the 91st percentile for ozone burden, the 51st percentile for particulate matter (PM) 2.5 burden, and 74th percentile for traffic burden. All of these environmental factors are attributed to heavy truck activity in the area. While California has strict vehicle-emissions standards, exhaust from cars and trucks is the main source of air pollution in much of the state7. Ozone can cause lung irritation, inflammation, and worsening of existing chronic health conditions, even at low levels of exposure 8. Exhaust fumes contain toxic chemicals that can damage DNA, cause cancer, make breathing difficult, and cause low weight and premature births9.

The census tract also ranks in the 50th percentile for hazardous waste facility impacts. Hazardous waste generators and facilities contribute to the contamination of air, water and soil near waste generators and facilities can harm the environment as well as people10.

6 https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/11d2f52282a54ceebcac7428e6184203/page/CalEnviroScreen- 4_0/
7 OEHHA Traffic https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/traffic-density 8 OEHHA Ozone https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/air-quality-ozone 9 OEHHA Traffic https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/traffic-density 10 OEHHA Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/hazardous-waste-generators-and-facilities 5 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 919
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1549 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

6 Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 60% Hispanic, 6% African-American, and 2% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of low educational attainment, meaning 79% of the census tract residents over age 25 has not attained a high school diploma. The community also has a high rate of poverty, meaning 47% of the households in the census tract have a total income before taxes that is less than the poverty level. Income can affect health when people cannot afford healthy living and working conditions, nutritious food and necessary medical care11. Poor communities are often located in areas with high levels of pollution12. Poverty can cause stress that weakens the immune system and causes people to become ill from pollution13. Living in poverty is also an indication that residents may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Medical care is vital for this census tract as it ranks in the 78th percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease and 49th percentile for incidence of asthma.

The State of California lists three approved compliance modeling softwares 14 for non-residential buildings: CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, and IES VE. CalEEMod is not listed as approved softwares.

The CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and under-reports the project’s significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the public and decision makers. If the project applies for a building permit on or after January 1, 2026, it must comply with the 2025 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and only CBECC is listed as an approved software for the updated standards 15. Since the MND did not accurately or adequately model the energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, it cannot conclude the project will generate less than significant impacts and a finding of significance must be made in an EIR.

11 OEHHA Poverty https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/poverty 12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency-1
15 California Energy Commission 2025 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2025- energy-code-compliance-software
5 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 920
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1550 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

7 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The project site is located within March Air Reserve Base (MARB)/Inland Port Airport Compatibility Zone D. The MND does not provide any information regarding required review by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC) and the FAA. Zone D prohibits hazards to flight16, and the project has not been reviewed by the MARB or FAA to analyze if hazards to flight exist. The MND has not provided any substantial evidence to support a less than significant finding and an EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance.

11. Land Use and Planning
The MND does not meaningfully discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Exhibit LU-4: Land Use Buildout Summary within the General Plan Land Use Element17 analyzes a 0.40 FAR for Industrial development within EDC- NG land use designation and 25,020,987 square feet of non- retail development within all EDC areas. The project site as a FAR of 0.44, which is greater than the assumption of the environmental analysis which it attempts to tier from. The proposed project would increase the maximum allowable non-retail development within the EDC and the MND has not provided any information or analysis on this topic. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. An EIR must be prepared to provide an accurate build-out scenario of the City’s General Plan, including analysis of the proposed project’s increase in building area of non-retail development.

The MND has not provided any analysis with the Goals and Policies of SCAG’s Connect SoCal RTP/SCS18 and an EIR must be prepared to at minimum include consistency analysis of the following:

16 https://rcaluc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421/files/2023-06/March.pdf 17 Menifee General Plan Land Use Element
https://www.cityofmenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14701/FINAL_Land-Use-Element_11322 18 https://scag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/23-2987-connect-socal-2024-final-complete-040424.pdf 6 7
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 921
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1551 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

8 1. Equitable Engagement and Decision-Making Policy 46. Promote racial equity that is grounded in the recognition of the past and current harms of systemic racism and one that advances restorative justice.

2. Equitable Engagement and Decision-Making Policy 47. Increase equitable, inclusive, and meaningful representation and participation of people of color and disadvantaged communities in planning processes.

3. Sustainable Development Policy 48. Promote sustainable development and best practices that enhance resource conservation, reduce resource consumption and promote resilience.

4. Sustainable Development Policy 49. Support communities across the region to advance innovative sustainable development practices.

5. Sustainable Development Policy 50. Recognize and support the diversity of communities across the region by promoting local place-making, planning and development efforts that advance equity, mobility, resilience and sustainability.

6. Air Quality Policy 51. Reduce hazardous air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality throughout the region through planning and implementation efforts.

7. Air Quality Policy 52. Support investments that reduce hazardous air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.

8. Air Quality Policy 53. Reduce the exposure and impacts of emissions and pollutants and promote local and regional efforts that improve air quality for vulnerable populations, including but not limited to Priority Equity Communities and the AB 617 Communities.

9. Climate Resilience Policy 64. Prioritize the most vulnerable populations and communities subject to climate hazards to help the people, places and infrastructure that are most at risk for climate change impacts. In doing so, recognize that disadvantaged communities are often overburdened.

10. Climate Resilience Policy 65. Support local and regional climate and hazard planning and implementation efforts for transportation, land use, and other factors. 7 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 922
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1552 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

9 11. Climate Resilience Policy 66. Support nature-based solutions to increase regional resilience of the natural and built environment.

The MND does not provide a consistency analysis with all land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The MND is inadequate as an informational document and an EIR must be prepared with a consistency analysis with all General Plan policies, including but not limited to the following:

1. Goal S-7: A community that has protected its sensitive structures, functions, and populations from the risks associated with climate change.

2. Policy EJ-3.6: Continue to collaborate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resources Board (CARB), utility providers, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and nonprofit organizations, neighborhoods groups, and other community organizations to improve air quality, food availability, renewable energy systems, sustainable land use and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs).

3. Policy C-5.3: Support efforts to reduce/eliminate the negative environmental impacts of goods movement.

4. Goal OSC-10: An environmentally aware community that is responsive to changing climate conditions and actively seeks to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions.

5. Policy OCS-10.1: Align the city's local GHG reduction targets to be consistent with the statewide GHG reduction target of AB 32.

6. Policy OCS-10.2: Align the city's long-term GHG reduction goal consistent with the statewide GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05.

7. Policy OCS-10.3: Participate in regional greenhouse gas emission reduction initiatives.

8. Policy OCS-10.4: Consider impacts to climate change as a factor in evaluation of policies, strategies, and projects.
7 8
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 923
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1553 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

10 9. Policy C-5.3: Support efforts to reduce/eliminate the negative environmental impacts of goods movement.

14. Population and Housing
The project faces significant inconsistencies with statutory requirements of the Housing Crisis Act (HCA) of 2019/Senate Bill (SB) 330 19/SB 8 20. The HCA/SB 330/SB 8 require replacement housing sites when land designated for housing development experience changes to ensure no net loss of housing capacity. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Economic Development Corridor - Northern Gateway (EDC-NG) that has a maximum density of 24 dwelling units per acre21. The approximately 17.19 acre project site can accommodate the development of up to 412 dwelling units. Additionally, Exhibit LU-4 within the City’s General Plan depicts that the EDC-NG designation assumes residential development on only 29 acres within the planning area, which accommodates the development of residential dwelling units on the project site. The General Plan also states that residential development in the EDC areas, “…shall not be allowed on parcels or properties directly adjacent to the freeway,” and specifically in the EDC-NG, “Limited residential development maybe appropriate between new business park uses and existing single- family homes, or in places where residential projects have already been approved,” and existing single-family homes are located adjacent to the south of the project site. This indicates hat the project site is one of the few parcels that could accommodate residential development in the EDC- NG.

Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A) requires that agencies shall not “change the general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation, or zoning to a less intensive use below what was allowed under the land use designation and zoning ordinances in effect at the time of the proposed change.” Under Government Code Section 66300(b)(1)(A), a “less intensive use” includes, but is not limited to, reductions to height, density, or floor area ratio, new or increased open space or lot size requirements, or new or increased setback requirements, minimum frontage

19 Housing Crisis Act of 2019/SB 330
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB330 20 SB 8 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB8 21 Menifee General Plan Exhibit LU-4: Land Use Buildout Summary https://www.cityofmenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14675/3_LU-4_FINAL 9 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 924
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1554 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

11 requirements, or maximum lot coverage limitations, or any other action that would individually or cumulatively reduce residential development capacity. Pursuant to SB 330, replacement capacity for any displaced residential units must be provided concurrently at the time of project approval.

Approval of the proposed project will individually and cumulatively reduce residential development capacity allowed by the City’s General Plan.

Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) states that, “this section does not prohibit an affected county or an affected city, including the local electorate acting through the initiative process, from changing a land use designation or zoning ordinance to a less intensive use, or reducing the intensity of land use, if the city or county concurrently changes the development standards, policies, and conditions applicable to other parcels within the jurisdiction to ensure that there is no net loss in residential capacity.” As calculated above, the project site’s EDC-NG designation provides development capacity for 412 residential units. Approval of the proposed project will result in a reduction of the existing residential development capacity by 412 units to a decreased development capacity of 0 residential units.

This is in conflict with SB 8 that expanded the provisions of the HCA to include Government Code Section 66300 (h)(i)(1) requiring concurrent approval of replacement sites to ensure no net loss in residential capacity, and Section 66300 (h)(2)(A) defining “concurrently” to mean the action is approved at the same meeting of the legislative body. The MND has not identified replacement sites for the net loss in residential capacity for 412 units as a result of project implementation. The loss in residential capacity must be included as a finding of significance as part of an EIR. The MND does not act in conformance with the HCA/SB 330/SB 8 and the lost zoning capacity of any dwelling units is a significant environmental impact in violation of the HCA/SB 330/SB 8. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance due to this inconsistency.

Additionally, deferring the environmental analysis of construction and operation of replacement sites to a later date is project piecemealing in violation of CEQA. The MND does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” (CEQA § 15378). The whole of the action must statutorily 9 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 925
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1555 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

12 and legally include the identification of replacement sites and all associated actions required to implement development of at least 412 residential units.

The MND utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impact to population and housing. The MND does not provide any discussion of the project’s construction job generation.

The MND states that the operational project, “…would employ roughly 277 persons. However, these employed persons would likely be drawn from existing local workforce.” The MND does not provide the source or methodology supporting the calculation of 277 employees. Excluding the methodology for calculating employment generation does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as the methodology for calculating employment generation contributes directly to analysis of the problem at hand. An EIR must be prepared and recirculated to include the methodology for calculating employment generation for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to comply with C EQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)).

The MND does not provide evidence that the City’s workforce is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector to substantiate this claim. Relying on the unemployed workforce population of the surrounding region will increase project related VMT and emissions (exponentially further than that of the “low VMT TAZ” utilized in the MND in an attempt to conclude less than significant VMT impacts) during all phases of construction and operations and an EIR must be prepared to account for longer worker trip distances.

The MND states that the, “…Proposed Project would be consistent with the growth assumptions estimated by SCAG for the City of Menifee.” However, it does not provide any discussion or analysis of growth projections by SCAG or the City’s General Plan. SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast22 notes that the City will add 8,500 jobs between 2019 - 2035.

22 SCAG 2024 Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast https://scag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/23-2987-tr-demographics-growth-forecast-final-040424.pdf 9 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 926
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1556 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

13 Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 277 employees, the project represents 2.5% of the City’s employment growth from 2019 - 2035. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment growth over 16 years represents a significant amount of growth. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2019 and projects “ in the pipeline” to determine the City’s progress towards SCAG’s employment growth forecast for the City. For example, other recent industrial projects23 such as Menifee Commerce Center (2,885 employees), Menifee Commerce Center Phase II (1,962 employees), Northern Gateway Commerce Center (2,267 employees), Ares Warehouse on Murrieta (952 employees), Capstone Industrial (1,205 employees), Wheat Warehouse (151 employees), Corsica Business Park (477 employees), Trumble and Watson Warehouse (571 employees), McLaughlin San Jacinto Warehouses (846 employees), Mapes and Sherman Warehouse (478 employees), United Carports Warehouse (105 employees), Motte Business Center (1,964 employees), Ethanac and Barnett Warehouse (440 employees), CADO Menifee (860 employees), Compass Northern Gateway (599 employees), Ares Murrieta Road Warehouse (652 employees), Northern Logistics Gateway Center (694 employees), and Menifee Pemcor Business Park (553 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 18,113 employees, which is 213% of the City’s employment growth forecast over 16 years accounted for by these industrial projects submitted since 2020. This exceeds the projected growth forecast for the City and is more than double the forecast. This number increases exponentially when the City’s commercial development activity and other projects since 2019 (SCAG) and 2013 (General Plan) are added to the calculation. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis. A finding of significance must also be included as the project exceeds the City’s growth forecast.

23 Data for listed projects via City of Menifee Land Development Projects Map https://cityofmenifee.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/minimalist/index.html?appid=55fc56d4eee94e588a28 a958cebac908 and Accela Menifee https://aca-
prod.accela.com/MENIFEE/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Planning&TabName=Planning&TabList=Hom e%7C0%7CPermits%7C1%7CEngineering%7C2%7CPlanning%7C3%7CFire%7C4%7CCurrentTabInde x%7C3
9 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 927
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1557 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

14 The MND states that, “The Proposed Project would not induce population growth neither directly nor indirectly. Therefore, no impacts would occur.” However, there is no analysis of the new realignment of Watson Road and SR-74. Extensions and improved functionality can indirectly induce unplanned growth in the area, and the MND has not analyzed this project component. An EIR must be prepared to include this for analysis in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

17. Transportation
The project’s VMT impacts are misrepresented by the VMT analysis. The MND relies upon a VMT screening analysis which concludes that the proposed project site is located in a low VMT- generating Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) which results in less than significant Transportation impacts. The project site is located in TAZ ID 1098, which is bound by Mapes Road to the north, the I-215 highway/Trumble Road to the west, Sherman Road to the east, and parcels approximately 300 feet south of the project site.

9 10
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 928
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1558 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

15 The City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled24 (City’s Guidelines) requires that, “…the analyst must identify if the project is consistent with the existing General Plan land use within that TAZ and use professional judgement that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be misrepresented utilizing the data from the travel demand model.” The TAZ is primarily comprised of vacant land with scattered rural residences and low intensity and underdeveloped properties. The proposed project is unique in that the TAZ in which the Project site is located does not contain any other large scale operational warehouse buildings and is over 50% vacant land. The VMT analysis has improperly screened out the proposed project from preparing a project-specific VMT analysis and is not consistent with the City Guidelines. The VMT screening analysis does not adequately or accurately represent the VMT impacts of the proposed project and an EIR must be prepared with a project-specific VMT analysis.

The Fehr and Peer’s WRCOG SB 743 Implementation Pathway Document Package 25 states that the exemption for projects in low VMT areas, “may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips.” The proposed project will generate 561 average daily trips (actual vehicles; 861 average daily trips PCE) and daily operations as a warehouse involves extremely high VMT rates during the course of business. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer/delivery van VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at work at the proposed project, they will conduct their jobs by driving delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which will drastically increase project- generated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. An EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity and remove the applied VMT exemption.

24 https://www.cityofmenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14755/TIA-Guidelines-for-VMT-January-2022- Update
25 WRCOG SB 743 Implementation Pathway Document Package https://www.fehrandpeers.com/wp- content/uploads/2019/12/WRCOG-SB743-Document-Package.pdf 10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 929
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1559 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

16 Additionally, the modeling in Appendix I does not follow the City’s Guidelines nor the WRCOG User Guide26. Appendix I states that, “Based on the evaluation done using WRCOG VMT Tool, the proposed project is located within TAZ 1098 and the baseline (2018) project generated VMT per service population (32.96) does not exceed the threshold Jurisdiction VMT per service population (33.6).” The WRCOG User Guide states that when running the model, “…select the Baseline Year. The user can select any year between 2018 and 2045. This should be the year of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released for the Project. The user should confirm the appropriate year for each Project.” Since no NOP was released for the project, the baseline year modeled should be 2025 in accordance with the date of the environmental analysis (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a)(1)). Appendix I also shows that only APN 329240045 was modeled, which is not part of the project site.

The MND has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. Appendix I includes Figure 24:

Turning Radii Driveway 1 (northernmost driveway on Trumble Road), Figure 25: Turning Radii Driveway 2 (southernmost driveway on Trumble Road), Figure 26: Turning Radii - Watson Road & SR-74. Appendix I states that, “The templates are based on California Legal Heavy-Duty Truck (Kenworth W900 series) used for long haul and heavy-haul trips.” The Kenworth W900 series trucks are 28 feet in length without a trailer attached. It is not possible to discern from Figures 24- 26 the full length of the truck/trailer utilized for modeling. An EIR must be prepared to model a WB-67 truck (a standard 72 feet in length) maneuvering throughout the site and accessing the site at all vehicular access points in order to provide an adequate, accurate environmental analysis and worst-case scenario modeling.

Additionally, the modeling in Appendix I shows that the site includes several potential areas for conflicts between trucks/trailers and/or passenger cars. For example, Figure 25 depicts that a truck/trailer maneuvering throughout the parking lot to access the loading dock area does not have enough maneuvering space. The modeling lines overlap with the other truck/trailer and clearly

26 https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/WRCOG_VMT_Tool/WRCOG_VMT_Tool_User_Guide.pdf 10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 930
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1560 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

17 show there is not enough space for two trucks to simultaneously utilize the driveway. If a vehicle is utilizing this area of the parking lot, the incoming truck/trailer would collide into it, and vice versa. This demonstrates again that there is not adequate maneuvering space for trucks/trailers, additional queuing space is needed, and the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features.

10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 931
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1561 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

18 Figure 26 also depicts several areas of conflict at the realignment of Watson Road and SR-74. The modeling lines overlap with the other truck/trailer and clearly show there is not enough space for two trucks to simultaneously utilize the area. If a vehicle is maneuvering on this area of Watson Road, the other truck/trailer would collide into it, and vice versa. The driveway connecting Watson Road to the project site is also not wide enough to accommodate two trucks/trailers simultaneously maneuvering. This demonstrates again that there is not adequate maneuvering space for trucks/trailers, additional queuing space is needed, and the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features.

10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 932
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1562 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

19 The realignment of Watson Road and the SR-74 creates several new intersections, some of which have not been analyzed for turning or maneuvering. As shown below, the trucks modeled turning into the project site from Watson Road have not been modeled to continue on and access the site.

There is significant potential for conflicts between vehicles here as vehicular movements are simultaneously occurring from points from the east and west to access the loading dock. The MND also does not describe any type of access control for the new intersections, such as stop signs or lights. This demonstrates again that there is not adequate maneuvering space for trucks/trailers, additional queuing space is needed, and the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features. Excluding this analysis also directly conflicts with, “Circulation Element Action C-2: Roadway Network Resolve the roadway alignments, intersections geometrics and traffic control features within the Connectivity Analysis Zones identified in Exhibit C-3:

Roadway Network prior to approval of new development projects which significantly impact or constrain alignment alternatives in those zones.” An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because the project will substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features.

10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 933
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1563 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

20 The MND states that, “Final Project Site plans would be subject to City review and approval which would ensure that Project driveway intersections and internal circulation are safe, with adequate sight distance, driveway widths and stop signs where necessary for entering and exiting the site.

The final plans will also identify access routes to/from the Project Site and potential turning movement restrictions for City review and approval, as outlined in Appendix H.” This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)). The MND has not provided any details regarding the City standards for items such as road development, stacking distances, lines of sight, or meaningful analysis of the project’s compliance or noncompliance with these requirements.

Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance as the MND has not provided any substantial evidence to support a less than significant finding.

The MND states regarding emergency access that, “The Proposed Project is required to comply with Fire Department requirements for adequate access. As stated in the Traffic Study, Project Site access and circulation would provide adequate access, turning radius, and driveway width and spacing for emergency vehicles, consistent with the Fire Department’s requirements. Emergency access to the Project Site would be maintained during construction.” This does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)). The MND has not provided any details regarding the requirements for emergency access or meaningful analysis of the project’s compliance or noncompliance with these requirements. Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance as the MND has not provided any substantial evidence to support a less than significant finding.

Additionally, the MND has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the 10 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 934
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1564 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

21 continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)). An EIR must be prepared with this analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

21. Mandatory Findings of Significance
The MND has not provided an adequate or accurate cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. The MND does not discuss or analyze the project’s compliance with the General Plan’s Land Use Buildout Scenario. Exhibit LU-4: Land Use Buildout Summary within the General Plan Land Use Element27 analyzes a 0.40 FAR for Industrial development within EDC-NG land use designation and 25,020,987 square feet of non-retail development within all EDC areas. The project site as a FAR of 0.44, which is greater than the assumption of the environmental analysis which it attempts to tier from. The proposed project would increase the maximum allowable non- retail development within the EDC and the MND has not provided any information or analysis on this topic. The MND has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. An EIR must be prepared to provide an accurate build-out scenario of the City’s General Plan, including analysis of the proposed project’s increase in building area of non- retail development.

Further, SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast28 notes that the City will add 8,500 jobs between 2019 - 2035. Utilizing the MND’s calculation of 277 employees, the project represents 2.5% of the City’s employment growth from 2019 - 2035. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment growth over 16 years represents a significant amount

27 Menifee General Plan Land Use Element
https://www.cityofmenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14701/FINAL_Land-Use-Element_11322 28 SCAG 2024 Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast https://scag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/23-2987-tr-demographics-growth-forecast-final-040424.pdf 10 11
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 935
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1565 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

22 of growth. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2019 and projects “ in the pipeline” to determine the City’s progress towards SCAG’s employment growth forecast for the City. For example, other recent industrial projects29 such as Menifee Commerce Center (2,885 employees), Menifee Commerce Center Phase II (1,962 employees), Northern Gateway Commerce Center (2,267 employees), Ares Warehouse on Murrieta (952 employees), Capstone Industrial (1,205 employees), Wheat Warehouse (151 employees), Corsica Business Park (477 employees), Trumble and Watson Warehouse (571 employees), McLaughlin San Jacinto Warehouses (846 employees), Mapes and Sherman Warehouse (478 employees), United Carports Warehouse (105 employees), Motte Business Center (1,964 employees), Ethanac and Barnett Warehouse (440 employees), CADO Menifee (860 employees), Compass Northern Gateway (599 employees), Ares Murrieta Road Warehouse (652 employees), Northern Logistics Gateway Center (694 employees), and Menifee Pemcor Business Park (553 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 18,113 employees, which is 213% of the City’s employment growth forecast over 16 years accounted for by these industrial projects submitted since 2020. This exceeds the projected growth forecast for the City and is more than double the forecast. This number increases exponentially when the City’s commercial development activity and other projects since 2019 (SCAG) and 2013 (General Plan) are added to the calculation. An EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis. A finding of significance must also be included as the project exceeds the City’s growth forecast.

The MND also has not analyzed the project’s cumulative and direct/indirect impacts. As discussed above, the project is a piecemealed portion of a larger overall development proposed by the project proponent. As discussed above, the streets and utilities constructed to serve the project will also serve piecemealed development, including the known Northern Gateway Logistics Center. The

29 Data for listed projects via City of Menifee Land Development Projects Map https://cityofmenifee.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/minimalist/index.html?appid=55fc56d4eee94e588a28 a958cebac908 and Accela Menifee https://aca-
prod.accela.com/MENIFEE/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Planning&TabName=Planning&TabList=Hom e%7C0%7CPermits%7C1%7CEngineering%7C2%7CPlanning%7C3%7CFire%7C4%7CCurrentTabInde x%7C3
11 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 936
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1566 of 3153

Russell Brown
November 4, 2025
Page

23 environmental analysis is deficient in providing substantial evidence to support less than significant findings in several impact areas, meaning that a less than significant finding cannot be archived. An EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance here as the MND has not provided any substantial evidence to support a less than significant finding.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,

Vashon Simien
Blum, Collins & Ho, LLP

Attachments:

1. SWAPE Technical Analysis
11 12
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 937
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1567 of 3153

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
October 31, 2025
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, Ste. 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Subject: Comments on the Trumble and Watson Warehouse Project (SCH No. 2025100303) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the October 2025 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the Trumble and Watson Warehouse Project (“Project”) located in the City of Menifee (“City”). The Project proposes to construct a 328,205-square-foot (“SF”) warehouse, including 15,000-SF of office space, and 422 parking spaces on the 17.2-acre site.

Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s hazards, hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential hazards, hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Inadequate Disclosure and Analysis of Impacts
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) was not prepared for the Project site. Phase I ESAs are often prepared in CEQA matters to aid in the identification and disclosure of hazardous materials issues that may pose a risk to the public, workers, or the environment, and which may require further investigation through the conduct of a Phase II ESA.

Standards for performing a Phase I ESA have been established by the US EPA and the American Society for Testing and Materials Standards (“ASTM”).1 Phase I ESAs are conducted to identify conditions indicative of releases of hazardous substances and include:

1 http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1527.htm
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 938
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1568 of 3153

2 • a review of all known sites in the vicinity of the subject property that are on regulatory agency databases undergoing assessment or cleanup activities;
• an inspection;
• interviews with people knowledgeable about the property; and • recommendations for further actions to address potential hazards.

Phase I ESAs conclude with the identification of any “recognized environmental conditions” (“RECs”) and recommendations to address such conditions. A REC is the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. If RECs are identified, then a Phase II ESA generally follows, which includes the collection of soil, soil vapor and groundwater samples, as necessary, to identify the extent of contamination and the need for cleanup to reduce exposure potential to the public.

A Phase I ESA is especially needed for the Project which is located on a parcel formerly used as an open pit. According to the IS/MND:
“Trumble Pit Site (or Trumble Road Open Pit), was originally operated as an open pit mine and soil hauling (import and export) facility and has, most recently, been used as a soil and concrete recycling area. The former open pit was subject to rough grading and restoration between 2019 and 2023. The pit restoration involved 5,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 207,000 cy of fill import to fill the pit and level the site” (p. 7).

The fill used to level the Project site is described as “undocumented fill” on p. 50 of the IS/MND. The IS/MND states that the Project “would result in approximately 29,623 cubic yards (cy) of cut strictly related to building stability and pads” (p. 7). Therefore, the fill that was used to level the Project site will be disturbed during construction. If the imported fill originated from contaminated soils, workers and the adjacent public could potentially be exposed to dust that is contaminated with hazardous materials.

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control has published guidance on the importation of fill to ensure it is not contaminated.
2 Sampling of the fill on the Project site should be conducted, as part of a Phase I ESA prior to Project certification. If the Phase I ESA identifies soil contamination that is above regulatory screening levels, including California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s Soil Screening Numbers3, should be further evaluated and cleaned up, if necessary, in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Toxics Substances Control.

2 https://dtsc.ca.gov/information-advisory-clean-imported-fill-material-fact-sheet/ 3 https://dtsc.cdev.sites.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2019/04/HHRA-Note-3-June-2020-A.pdf Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 939
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1569 of 3153

3 Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in Appendix A to the IS/MND, we identified several model inputs related to Project construction and operation that are inconsistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. The impacts of these changes are quantified in the section of this letter titled “Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact.” An EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that provides a more detailed evaluation of the impact that construction and operation of the Project may have on local and regional air quality.

Failure to Consider Potential Cold Storage Requirements The “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model includes a total of 313,205-SF of the “Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail” land use (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 9, 10).

The model does not include any refrigerated warehouse space. This omission may incorrectly represent the Project, as the IS/MND does not mention potential tenants whatsoever. As the future site tenants are unknown, the future tenants of the proposed warehouse buildings may require cold storage. As refrigerated warehouse space is the most energy-intensive, the Project should have included the proposed warehouse space as cold storage in order to conduct the most conservative analysis.

Warehouses equipped with cold storage, such as refrigerators and freezers, consume more energy when compared to warehouses without cold storage and are known to require refrigerated trucks that idle for longer than unrefrigerated hauling trucks.4,5 The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) states that refrigerated warehouses often include Transport Refrigeration Units (“TRUs”), which are added sources of air pollutant emissions relative to a non-refrigerated scenario.6 CEQA requires the use of “conservative analyses” to afford “fullest possible protection of the environment” which is applicable to all proposed projects within California. 7 For a conservative analysis,
an EIR should be prepared to account for the possibility of refrigerated warehouse needs by the future

4 “Warehouses.” Business Energy Advisor, available at: https://ouc.bizenergyadvisor.com/article/warehouses. 5 “Estimation of Fuel Use by Idling Commercial Trucks.” Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, January 2006, p. 8, available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245561735_Estimation_of_Fuel_Use_by_Idling_Commercial_Trucks. 6 “2022 Amendments to the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets, and Facilities Where TRUs Operate.” CARB, March 2022, available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/2022-amendments-tru-atcm. 7 “Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage” Presentation. SCAQMD Inland Empire Logistics Council, June 2014, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip- rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc_6-19-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 940
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1570 of 3153

4 tenants. By failing to account for potential cold storage requirements, the model may underestimate the Project’s operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Phase Lengths
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model includes changes to the default construction schedule (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 79).

As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 62):

The CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.8 The justification provided for these changes is:
“Per applicant provided data” (Appendix A, pp. 62).

Regarding the Project’s construction schedule, the IS/MND states:
“Construction of the Proposed Project was analyzed based on the applicant provided construction schedule and site plans. Construction would begin in October 2025 and occur over approximately 20 months.” (p. 23).

The changes to the individual construction phase lengths remain unsupported. While the IS/MND states that the “construction of the Proposed Project was analyzed based on the applicant provided construction schedule,” the IS/MND fails to provide the purported construction schedule, including the individual construction phase lengths, whatsoever. While the IS/MD justifies the total construction duration of 20 years, the IS/MND fails to substantiate the lengths of the individual construction phase lengths. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide:

8 “CalEEMod User Guide.” CAPCOA, April 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/documents/user- guide/01_User%20Guide.pdf, p. 13, 14.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 941
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1571 of 3153

5 “CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or project- specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA.” 9
As the IS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised individual construction phase lengths, we cannot verify the changes.

Without a verifiable source, construction emissions may be unevenly distributed, with some phases extended over longer periods. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).10

By modifying the individual construction phase lengths, the model assumes there are more days to complete the construction activities required by the certain phases. The model therefore assumes fewer activities would be required per day for those phases and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day.

Thus, the model may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with certain construction activities. In our opinion, the model should have included proportionately altered individual phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 20 months until the schedule is substantiated.

Failure to Include Required Amount of Material Export
The IS/MND reveals that Project construction requires material export, stating:
“Overall, the Project would result in approximately 29,623 cubic yards (cy) of cut strictly related to building stability and pads” (p. 7).

Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model does not include any amount of material export (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 66).

9 “CalEEMod User Guide.” CAPCOA, April 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/documents/user- guide/01_User%20Guide.pdf, p. 10.
10 “CalEEMod User Guide.” CAPCOA, April 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/documents/user- guide/01_User%20Guide.pdf, p. 34, Table 3.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 942
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1572 of 3153

6 The model thus underestimates the amount of material export generated by Project construction by 29,623-cy.

The inclusion of material export within the model is required to calculate emissions produced from material movement, including truck loading and unloading, and additional hauling truck trips. 11 By underestimating the amount of material export required for Project construction, the model underestimates the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared to provide an updated air quality analysis.

Incorrect Application of Construction Engine Tier 4 Final Mitigation The “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model includes the following construction mitigation measure (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 10).

Accordingly, the “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model also includes changes to the off-road construction equipment input parameters and assumes that the Project’s off-road equipment fleet would meet Tier 4 Final emissions standards (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 63, 64).

11 “CalEEMod User Guide.” CAPCOA, April 2022, available at: https://www.caleemod.com/documents/user- guide/01_User%20Guide.pdf, p. 36, 38.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 943
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1573 of 3153

7 Regarding the Project’s construction equipment, the IS/MND states:
“The Project applicant has indicated that construction equipment would utilize U.S. EPA Tier 4- rated diesel engines at a minimum” (p. 23).

The inclusion of more stringent emissions standards remains unsupported, as the IS/MND does not explicitly require advanced engine tiers, specifically Tier 4 Final, through a formal mitigation measure.

According to the Association of Environmental Professionals (“AEP”) CEQA Portal Topic Paper on mitigation measures:
“While not ‘mitigation’, a good practice is to include those project design feature(s) that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact.”12
As the inclusion of Tier 4 Final emissions standards on the Project site is not formally included as a mitigation measure, we cannot guarantee that it would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. By including Tier 4 Final emissions standards without properly committing to its implementation, the model may underestimate the Project’s operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

12 “CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures.” AEP, February 2020, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 6.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 944
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1574 of 3153

8 Incorrect Application of Operational Energy-Related Mitigation The “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model includes the following energy-related operational mitigation measures (see screenshot below) (Appendix A, pp. 10).

Regarding energy efficiency standards and solar power, the IS/MND states:
“The Proposed Project would exceed standards set in the latest iteration of the CBC (CCR Title 24) by two percent” (p. 47)
and
“The Proposed Project would include 150 kW of onsite solar electricity generation and would be served by SCE, which is required to increase its share of renewable energy procurement pursuant to SB 100 requirements. As a result, the Proposed Project would maximize the use of renewable energy” (p. 45).

However, this is inadequate, as the IS/MND does not explicitly require exceeding Title 24 energy efficiency standards or implementing solar power through formal mitigation measures. As previously discussed, design features that are not included as mitigation may not be implemented, monitored, or enforced on the Project site. As a result, the inclusion of the above-mentioned energy-related mitigation measures in the model is unsupported. By including energy-related mitigation without properly committing to its implementation, the model may underestimate the Project’s operational greenhouse gas emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact To more accurately estimate the Project’s construction-related emissions, we prepared a construction CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND. We proportionately altered the individual construction phase lengths to match the proposed 20-month construction duration, included the correct amount of material export, and omitted the construction-related mitigation and incorrect application of Tier 4 Final emissions standards. All other inputs remain consistent with the IS/MND’s model.

Our updated analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related total organic gases (“TOG”) emissions exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) daily threshold of 75 pounds per day (“lbs/day”) (see table below).

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 945
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1575 of 3153

9 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Estimates
Construction TOG
(lbs/day)
IS/MND 59
SWAPE 133
SCAQMD Threshold 75
Exceeds? Yes
According to our analysis, the construction-related TOG emissions are estimated to be approximately 133 lbs/day, exceeding the SCAQMD daily threshold. This finding indicates a potentially significant air quality impact that the IS/MND did not identify or address. In our opinion, an EIR should be conducted to provide a more substantial evaluation of the potential air quality impact from the Project on the environment.

Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND claims a less-than-significant health risk impact without conducting a quantified construction and operational health risk assessment (“HRA”). The IS/MND is thus inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project to the adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions. Under CEQA, agencies must make a “reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.”13 The IS/MND also fails to align with the California Department of Justice (“CA DOJ”) guidelines for warehouse best practices, which recommends that all potential warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA in accordance with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California. 14 To comply with these
requirements, an HRA should have been prepared to assess the potential health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions generated during construction and operation. The sum of the Project’s construction and operational cancer risk estimates should then be compared to the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.15 Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact We conducted a screening-level risk assessment using AERSCREEN, a screening-level air quality dispersion model which uses a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be

13 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2018/s219783a.html 14 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” CA DOJ, available at: https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best- practices.pdf, p. 6.
15 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, March 2023, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/south-coast-aqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=25.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 946
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1576 of 3153

10 exposed.16 We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health risk impacts health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the IS/MND’s CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by the OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.17 The “Trumble & Watson Detailed Report” model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 47 pounds of DPM over the 607-day construction period.18 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over construction of the Project, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑠𝑠� = 46.6 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸
607 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑 𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅 𝑑𝑑
24 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜 𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸 𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔
3,600 𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠 𝐸𝐸 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.000403 grams per second (“g/s”).

Subtracting the 607-day construction period from the total duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 28.34 years. The IS/MND’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 100 pounds of DPM per year during operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:

Emission Rate � grams
second� = 100 lbs
365 days × 453.6 grams
lbs × 1 day
24 hours × 1 hour
3,600 seconds = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐠𝐠/𝐬𝐬

We estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00144 g/s. Construction and operation were simulated as a 1.5-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 373- by 186.5- meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Menifee was obtained from U.S. 2024 Census data.
19 The AESCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations for the Project. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in

16 “Air Quality Dispersion Modeling - Screening Models,” U.S. EPA, available at: https://www.epa.gov/scram/air- quality-dispersion-modeling-screening-models.
17 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 18 See Attachment C for health risk calculations.
19 “Menifee.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2024, available at:
https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0646842?q=Menifee%2C+CA%2C+USA.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 947
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1577 of 3153

11 screening procedures.20 The IS/MND states that the closest known sensitive receptors include single- family residences that are as close as 10 feet, or 3 meters to the Project site (p. 27).

However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrate that the maximally exposed individual receptor (“MEIR”) is located approximately 200 meters downwind of the Project site.21 Thus, the single- hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for construction of the Project is therefore approximately

0.2592 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.02592 µg/m3 for Project construction. For Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 0.9245 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.09245 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.22 We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD. Guidance from OEHHA and CARB recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters used for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:

20 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/documents/epa-454r-92-019_ocr.pdf. 21 See Attachment D for AERSCREEN output files.
22 See Attachment E for AERSCREEN output files.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 948
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1578 of 3153

12 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)23
Age
Sensitivity
Factor24
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home25
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)26
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 0.85 350 24
Infant (0 – 2) 1090 10 2 0.85 350 24
Child (2 – 16) 572 3 14 0.72 350 24
Adult (16 – 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24

For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify doses for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day
-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. We used the following dose algorithm, therefore, to assess exposures:

𝐷𝐷𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎 𝑝𝑝 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑝𝑝 = 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 × 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × � 𝐵𝐵 𝑅𝑅 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵� × 𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
We then used the following equation for each appropriate age group to calculate the overall cancer risk:

23 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 24 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 25 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 26 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 949
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1579 of 3153

13 𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑔𝑔 𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 𝐷𝐷𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐸𝐸 × 𝐸𝐸𝐴𝐴 𝐹𝐹 × 𝐸𝐸 𝐷𝐷 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴
where:

DoseAIR = do.se by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 607-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and the first 1.41 years of the infantile stage of life (0-2 years). The annual annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 0.59 years of the infantile stage of life, as well as the entire child (2 – 16 years) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.0259 3.52E-07
Construction 1.41 0.0259 6.02E-06
Operation 0.59 0.0925 8.91E-06
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 1.49E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.0925 3.35E-05
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.0925 3.72E-06
Lifetime 30 5.25E-05

The excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 200 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, are approximately 0.352, 14.9, 33.5, and 3.72 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of the receptor lifetime (30 years) is approximately 52.5 in one million. The infant, child, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD’s threshold of 10 in one million, resulting in a potentially significant impact not addressed or identified by the IS/MND or associated documents.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 950
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1580 of 3153

14 Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential link between project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. The U.S. EPA Exposure Assessment Guidelines suggest an iterative, tiered approach to exposure assessments, starting with a simple screening-level evaluation using basic tools and conservative assumptions.
27 If a screening-level analysis exceeds thresholds, a more refined HRA with advanced models and detailed input data should follow.

Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact. An EIR should therefore be prepared to include a refined HRA, as recommended by the U.S. EPA. If the refined analysis similarly reaches a determination of significant impact, then mitigation measures should be incorporated, as described in our “Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions” section below.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions of 2,740 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO 2e/year”) (see excerpt below) (p. 58,
Table 15).

As such, the IS/MND concludes:

27 “Exposure Assessment Tools by Tiers and Types - Screening-Level and Refined.” U.S. EPA, May 2024, available at:
https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-tiers-and-types-screening-level-and-refined.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 951
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1581 of 3153

15 “As shown in the table, annual GHG emissions for the Project would be an estimated 2,740 MT CO2e. Annual Project emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant” (p. 58).

The IS/MND’s analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is insufficient for three reasons.
(1) The IS/MND’s quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model; (2) The IS/MND’s quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) The IS/MND fails to identify a potentially significant impact. 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,740 MT CO2e/year (p. 58, Table 15). However, the IS/MND’s quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided as Appendix A to the IS/MND, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the models underestimate the Project’s emissions, and the IS/MND’s quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the environment. 2) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,740 MT CO2e/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (p. 58). However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
28 Furthermore, AEP guidance states:
“[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.” 29
As it is currently October 2025, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the IS/MND’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric

28 HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 38550, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=38550. 29 “Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 39.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 952
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1582 of 3153

16 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.30 3) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG emissions, as estimated by the IS/MND, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year.

When applying this threshold, the Project’s unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.

As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,740 MT CO2e/year (p. 58, Table 15). According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population (“SP”) is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”31 According to the IS/MND, the Project would support approximately 277 employees (p. 24). As the proposed Project does not include any residential land uses, we estimate a SP of 277 people. When dividing the Project’s net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the IS/MND, by a SP of 277 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 9.9 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).32
IS/MND Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 2,740
Service Population 277
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 9.9
SCAQMD Threshold 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value, as estimated by the IS/MND’s net annual GHG emissions estimates and SP, exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the IS/MND. As a result, the IS/MND’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. An EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-than-significant levels.

30 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 31 “CEQA & Climate Change.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008, available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf, p. 71-72. 32 Calculated: (2,740 MT CO2e/year) / (277 SP) = (9.89 MT CO2e/SP/year).

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 953
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1583 of 3153

17 Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions The IS/MND is required under CEQA to implement all feasible mitigation to reduce the Project’s potential impacts. As demonstrated above, the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that should be mitigated further.

To reduce the TOG emissions associated with Project construction and operation, we recommend the IS/MND consider incorporating the following mitigation measures:33 • Use super-compliant VOC-content architectural coatings (0 grams per liter to less than 10 grams per liter VOC) during Project construction application of paints and other architectural coatings. • If paints and coatings with VOC content of 0 grams/liter to less than 10 grams/liter cannot be utilized, or they do not reduce emissions to below thresholds, the developer shall avoid application of architectural coatings during the peak smog season: July, August, and September.

In order to reduce the DPM emissions associated with Project construction and operation, we advise the IS/MND consider incorporating several mitigation measures if a refined HRA similarly concludes a significant cancer risk. For example, CARB recommends:
34 • Ensure the cleanest possible construction practices and equipment are used. This includes eliminating the idling of diesel-powered equipment and providing the necessary infrastructure (e.g., electrical hookups) to support zero and near-zero equipment and tools. • Implement, and plan accordingly for, the necessary infrastructure to support the zero and near- zero emission technology vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site. Necessary infrastructure may include the physical (e.g., needed footprint), energy, and fueling infrastructure for construction equipment, on-site vehicles and equipment, and medium-heavy and heavy-heavy duty trucks.
• Require all off-road diesel-powered equipment used during construction to be equipped with Tier 4 or cleaner engines, except for specialized construction equipment in which Tier 4 engines are not available. In place of Tier 4 engines, off-road equipment can incorporate retrofits, such that, emission reductions achieved are equal to or exceed that of a Tier 4 engine. • Require all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction be battery powered. • Require all heavy-duty trucks entering the construction site during the grading and building construction phases be model year 2014 or later. All heavy-duty haul trucks should also meet CARB’s lowest optional low-oxides of nitrogen (NOx) standard starting in the year 2022.

33 “Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.” Los Angeles County Housing Element Update Program EIR.

August 2021, available at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Housing_final-peir- mitigation-monitoring.pdf.
34 “Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers.” CARB, August 2023, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/CARB%20Comments%20- %20NOP%20for%20the%20%20Oak%20Valley%20North%20Project%20DEIR.pdf; Attachment A, p. 5 – 8.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 954
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1584 of 3153

18 • Require all construction equipment and fleets to be in compliance with all current air quality regulations.
• Require tenants to use the cleanest technologies available, and to provide the necessary infrastructure to support zero-emission vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site. • Require all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units. • Requiring all TRUs entering the project-site be plug-in capable. • Requiring all service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks) used within the project site to be zero-emission. This equipment is widely available and can be purchased using incentive funding from CARB’s Clean Off-Road Equipment Voucher Incentive Project (CORE).
• Require future tenants to exclusively use zero-emission light and medium-duty delivery trucks and vans.
• Require all heavy-duty trucks entering or on the project site to be zero-emission vehicles, and be fully zero-emission. A list of commercially available zero-emission trucks can be obtained from the Hybrid and Zero-emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). Additional incentive funds can be obtained from the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program. • Restrict trucks and support equipment from idling longer than two minutes while on site. • Require the installation of vegetative walls or other effective barriers that separate loading docks and people living or working nearby.

SCAQMD staff recommends:
35 • Clearly mark truck routes with signs so that trucks will not travel next to or near sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, daycare centers, etc.). • Design the Proposed Project such that truck entrances and exits are not facing sensitive receptors and trucks will not travel past sensitive land uses to enter or leave the Proposed Project site.
• Design the Proposed Project such that any truck check-in point is inside the Proposed Project site to ensure no trucks are queuing outside.
• Design the Proposed Project to ensure that truck traffic inside the Proposed Project site is as far away as feasible from sensitive receptors.
• Restrict overnight truck parking in sensitive land uses by providing overnight truck parking inside the Proposed Project site.

35 “Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Proposed CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project (Proposed Project).” SCAQMD, April 2024, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/comment-letters/2024/april-2024/RVC240313-05.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p. 2 - 3.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 955
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1585 of 3153

19 Lastly, to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the Project, we recommend the following measures from the CA DOJ: 36
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers.
• Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. • Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability. • Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. • Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Designing to LEED green building certification standards. • Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. • Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces.
• Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations.
• Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. • Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.

Provided above are several mitigation measures that would reduce Project-related TOG, DPM, and GHG emissions. These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently reduces emissions released during Project construction and operation.

An EIR should be prepared that includes all feasible mitigation measures, as well as an updated air quality analysis to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation

36 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 956
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1586 of 3153

20 of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited documentation regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,

Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Construction Calculations
Attachment C: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment D: AERSCREEN Output Files, Construction
Attachment E: AERSCREEN Output FIles, Operations
Attachment F: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment G: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 957
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1587 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
1 / 32
Trumble and Watson Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Attachment A
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 958
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1588 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
2 / 32

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 959
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1589 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
3 / 32

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 960
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1590 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
4 / 32

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 961
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1591 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
5 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Trumble and Watson
Construction Start Date 10/1/2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 0.20
Location 33.74876724021304, -117.18357681328712
County Riverside-South Coast
City Menifee
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5512
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.30

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
313 1000sqft 17.2 313,205 85,365 — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 962
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1592 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
6 / 32
————15,0000.001000sqft15.0General Office
Building
Parking Lot 517 Space 0.00 0.00 — — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 133 133 12.1 23.3 0.04 0.40 2.24 2.65 0.37 0.54 0.92 — 5,897 5,897 0.21 0.33 10.8 6,013 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.20 3.39 38.5 31.5 0.11 1.38 19.9 21.3 1.28 10.2 11.4 — 14,367 14,367 0.42 1.24 0.44 14,749 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 8.72 8.66 8.80 15.2 0.03 0.29 1.80 1.99 0.27 0.74 0.92 — 4,120 4,120 0.11 0.24 3.32 4,198 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.59 1.58 1.61 2.77 < 0.005 0.05 0.33 0.36 0.05 0.13 0.17 — 682 682 0.02 0.04 0.55 695

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 963
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1593 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
7 / 32
Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 2.00 1.68 12.1 23.3 0.04 0.40 2.24 2.65 0.37 0.54 0.92 — 5,897 5,897 0.21 0.33 10.8 6,013 2027 133 133 7.00 10.9 0.01 0.30 0.36 0.49 0.27 0.08 0.32 — 1,714 1,714 0.06 0.02 1.15 1,722 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.20 3.39 38.5 31.5 0.11 1.38 19.9 21.3 1.28 10.2 11.4 — 14,367 14,367 0.42 1.24 0.44 14,749 2026 1.96 1.65 12.3 20.9 0.04 0.40 2.24 2.65 0.37 0.54 0.92 — 5,747 5,747 0.16 0.34 0.28 5,852 2027 1.89 1.58 11.7 20.3 0.04 0.36 2.24 2.60 0.33 0.54 0.88 — 5,685 5,685 0.16 0.32 0.25 5,786 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.63 0.52 5.29 5.13 0.01 0.20 1.80 1.99 0.18 0.74 0.92 — 1,836 1,836 0.06 0.14 0.98 1,879 2026 1.40 1.17 8.80 15.2 0.03 0.29 1.60 1.89 0.27 0.39 0.66 — 4,120 4,120 0.11 0.24 3.32 4,198 2027 8.72 8.66 2.38 4.15 0.01 0.08 0.39 0.47 0.07 0.10 0.17 — 1,053 1,053 0.03 0.05 0.73 1,070 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.11 0.09 0.97 0.94 < 0.005 0.04 0.33 0.36 0.03 0.13 0.17 — 304 304 0.01 0.02 0.16 311 2026 0.26 0.21 1.61 2.77 < 0.005 0.05 0.29 0.34 0.05 0.07 0.12 — 682 682 0.02 0.04 0.55 695 2027 1.59 1.58 0.43 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 174 174 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 177

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 964
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1594 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
8 / 32
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.12 0.10 0.95 0.91 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 160 160 0.01 < 0.005 — 160 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.59 0.59 — 0.30 0.30 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02 0.02 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 26.4 26.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.11 0.11 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 965
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1595 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
9 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 227 227 0.01 0.01 0.02 230 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.92 6.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.15 1.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 966
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1596 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
10 / 32
6,622—0.050.276,5996,599—1.14—1.141.23—1.230.0628.329.73.203.80Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.25 9.25 — 3.66 3.66 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.35 0.30 2.76 2.64 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 615 615 0.02 < 0.005 — 617 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.86 0.86 — 0.34 0.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.50 0.48 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 102 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.16 0.16 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 967
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1597 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
11 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 259 259 0.01 0.01 0.03 262 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.30 0.11 8.70 2.07 0.05 0.14 1.97 2.12 0.14 0.55 0.70 — 7,509 7,509 0.14 1.18 0.41 7,865 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.4 24.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.03 0.01 0.82 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 699 699 0.01 0.11 0.64 733 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.05 4.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 0.02 0.11 121

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 968
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1598 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
12 / 32
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.08 0.06 0.59 0.74 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 — 137 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.6 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.64 0.57 0.66 7.96 0.00 0.00 1.78 1.78 0.00 0.42 0.42 — 1,767 1,767 0.08 0.07 0.18 1,789 Vendor 0.07 0.03 1.89 0.58 0.01 0.02 0.46 0.48 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,647 1,647 0.04 0.25 0.12 1,722 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 103 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 93.4 93.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 97.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.8 16.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 969
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1599 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
13 / 32

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.91 0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.17 0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 970
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1600 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
14 / 32
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.64 0.58 0.54 9.79 0.00 0.00 1.78 1.78 0.00 0.42 0.42 — 1,880 1,880 0.08 0.06 6.37 1,908 Vendor 0.07 0.03 1.73 0.54 0.01 0.02 0.46 0.48 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,619 1,619 0.04 0.25 4.43 1,699 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.61 0.54 0.60 7.42 0.00 0.00 1.78 1.78 0.00 0.42 0.42 — 1,729 1,729 0.03 0.07 0.17 1,750 Vendor 0.07 0.03 1.80 0.55 0.01 0.02 0.46 0.48 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,620 1,620 0.04 0.25 0.11 1,696 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.43 0.39 0.47 5.55 0.00 0.00 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.30 0.30 — 1,251 1,251 0.02 0.05 1.97 1,268 Vendor 0.05 0.02 1.29 0.39 0.01 0.02 0.33 0.35 0.02 0.09 0.11 — 1,157 1,157 0.03 0.18 1.36 1,212 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 < 0.005 0.01 0.33 210 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.24 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 192 192 < 0.005 0.03 0.23 201 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 971
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1601 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
15 / 32
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.20 0.17 1.51 2.08 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 385 385 0.02 < 0.005 — 386 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.03 0.28 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 63.7 63.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 63.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.58 0.52 0.54 6.85 0.00 0.00 1.78 1.78 0.00 0.42 0.42 — 1,697 1,697 0.02 0.06 0.15 1,717 Vendor 0.07 0.03 1.74 0.54 0.01 0.02 0.46 0.48 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,591 1,591 0.04 0.24 0.11 1,663 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 972
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1602 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
16 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 276 276 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 279 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 255 255 0.01 0.04 0.28 267 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 45.7 45.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 46.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 42.2 42.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 44.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 973
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1603 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
17 / 32
Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.05 0.44 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 95.2 95.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 95.5 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.05 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 < 0.005 0.01 0.63 206 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 187 187 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 189 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 974
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1604 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
18 / 32
——————————————————Average
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.97 1.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s
132 132 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 975
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1605 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
19 / 32

8.44—< 0.005< 0.0058.418.41—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.070.050.010.01Off-Roa d
Architect
ural
Coating
s

8.34 8.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.39 1.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.40 Architect
ural
Coating
s

1.52 1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.09 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 369 369 < 0.005 0.01 1.15 374 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.7 21.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 21.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 976
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1606 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
20 / 32
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.59 3.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 977
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1607 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
21 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 978
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1608 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
22 / 32
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/1/2025 10/15/2025 5.00 11.0 — Grading Grading 10/16/2025 12/2/2025 5.00 34.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 12/3/2025 3/23/2027 5.00 340 — Paving Paving 3/24/2027 4/23/2027 5.00 23.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/26/2027 5/26/2027 5.00 23.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 979
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1609 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
23 / 32
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 980
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1610 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
24 / 32
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 109 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 136 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 53.8 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 27.3 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 492,308 164,103 —
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 981
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1611 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
25 / 32

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 16.5 0.00 —
Grading — 29,623 102 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.00 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 982
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1612 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
26 / 32

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 27.8 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 2.60 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 9.89 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 983
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1613 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
27 / 32
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 984
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1614 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
28 / 32
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 51.4
AQ-DPM 21.5
Drinking Water 67.4
Lead Risk Housing 21.2
Pesticides 70.2
Toxic Releases 24.2
Traffic 74.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 0.00
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 50.1
Impaired Water Bodies 12.5
Solid Waste 22.1
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 48.8
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 985
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1615 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
29 / 32
Cardio-vascular 78.2
Low Birth Weights 53.5
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 79.3
Housing 24.9
Linguistic 16.4
Poverty 46.8
Unemployment 73.4

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 60.29770307
Employed 40.65186706
Median HI 53.71487232
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 37.28987553
High school enrollment 21.68612858
Preschool enrollment 56.08879764
Transportation —
Auto Access 87.47593995
Active commuting 24.03438984
Social —
2-parent households 65.68715514
Voting 37.14872321
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 82.31746439
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 986
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1616 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
30 / 32
Park access 26.70345182
Retail density 10.84306429
Supermarket access 22.85384319
Tree canopy 2.014628513
Housing —
Homeownership 88.6179905
Housing habitability 84.80687797
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 74.63107917 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 62.78711664
Uncrowded housing 64.30129603
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.9
Asthma ER Admissions 51.4
High Blood Pressure 4.3
Cancer (excluding skin) 3.1
Asthma 46.1
Coronary Heart Disease 2.1
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9.6
Diagnosed Diabetes 20.7
Life Expectancy at Birth 41.6
Cognitively Disabled 70.6
Physically Disabled 50.9
Heart Attack ER Admissions 20.0
Mental Health Not Good 57.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 3.6
Obesity 36.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 987
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1617 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
31 / 32
Physical Health Not Good 33.7
Stroke 7.6
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 80.1
Current Smoker 59.6
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 36.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 7.4
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 31.0
Elderly 48.0
English Speaking 75.4
Foreign-born 34.0
Outdoor Workers 12.6
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 83.3
Traffic Density 34.3
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 58.4
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 52.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 55.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 50.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 988
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1618 of 3153

Trumble and Watson Detailed Report, 10/30/2025
32 / 32
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Consistent with IS/MND.

Construction: Construction Phases See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Phase Lengths".

Operations: Water and Waste Water Consistent with IS/MND.

Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 989
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1619 of 3153

Phase
Default Phase
Length

Construction
Duration %

Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Site Preparation 10 536 0.0187 608 11
Grading 30 536 0.0560 608 34
Construction 300 536 0.5597 608 340
Paving 20 536 0.0373 608 23
Architectural Coating 20 536 0.0373 608 23
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 10/30/2025 10/1/2025
End Date 4/19/2027 6/1/2027
Total Days 536 608
Construction Schedule Calculations
Attachment B
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 990
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1620 of 3153

Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.005 Total DPM (lbs) 46.63013699 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.05 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.02739726 Total DPM (g) 21151.43014 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.273972603 Construction Duration (days) 92 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.000403308 Total DPM (lbs) 100 Total DPM (lbs) 2.520547945 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001438356 Total DPM (g) 1143.320548 Total Acreage 17.19 Release Height (meters) 3 Start Date 10/1/2025 Max Horizontal (meters) 373.00 Total Acreage 17.19 End Date 1/1/2026 Min Horizontal (meters) 186.50 Max Horizontal (meters) 373.00 Construction Days 92 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Horizontal (meters) 186.50 Setting Urban Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.02 Population 117,041 Setting Urban Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.109589041 Start Date 10/1/2025 Population 117,041 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 5/31/2027
Total DPM (lbs) 40 Total Construction Days 607
Total DPM (g) 18144 Total Years of Construction 1.66
Start Date 1/1/2026 Total Years of Operation 28.34
End Date 1/1/2027
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.005
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.02739726
Construction Duration (days) 150
Total DPM (lbs) 4.109589041
Total DPM (g) 1864.109589
Start Date 1/1/2027
End Date 5/31/2027
Construction Days 150
2027
2026
Construction Operation
2025 Total Emission Rate
Attachment C
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 991
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1621 of 3153

Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.0259 3.52E-07
Construction 1.41 0.0259 6.02E-06
Operation 0.59 0.0925 8.91E-06
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 1.49E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.0925 3.35E-05
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.0925 3.72E-06
Lifetime 30 5.25E-05
The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 992
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1622 of 3153

AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112                                      10/29/25 12:25:07
TITLE: Trumble and Watson, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE:         0.403E‐03 g/s             0.320E‐02 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE:           0.580E‐08 g/(s‐m2)        0.460E‐07 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT:                       3.00 meters               9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE:           373.00 meters            1223.75 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE:          186.50 meters             611.88 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:        1.50 meters               4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN:                   URBAN
POPULATION:                      117041
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =          5000. meters             16404. feet ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo        SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000    0.2592      20   200.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Attachment D
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 993
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1623 of 3153

**********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:       0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:          Winter
ALBEDO:                  0.35
BOWEN RATIO:             1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:       1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED
METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 10  10 01
H0     U*     W*  DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH  M‐O LEN    Z0  BOWEN ALBEDO  REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐  ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50 HT
REF TA     HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0   310.0    2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM                             MAXIMUM
DIST     1‐HR CONC                  DIST     1‐HR CONC
(m)      (ug/m3)                    (m)      (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐               ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐

1.00    0.2006                   2525.00    0.8401E‐02
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 994
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1624 of 3153

25.00    0.2112                   2550.00    0.8291E‐02

50.00    0.2210                   2575.00    0.8182E‐02

75.00    0.2299                   2600.00    0.8076E‐02 100.00    0.2381                   2625.00    0.7972E‐02 125.00    0.2455                   2650.00    0.7871E‐02 150.00    0.2524                   2675.00    0.7772E‐02 175.00    0.2588                   2700.00    0.7675E‐02 200.00    0.2592                   2725.00    0.7580E‐02 225.00    0.2017                   2750.00    0.7488E‐02 250.00    0.1633                   2775.00    0.7397E‐02 275.01    0.1411                   2800.00    0.7308E‐02 300.00    0.1260                   2825.00    0.7221E‐02 325.00    0.1152                   2850.00    0.7136E‐02 350.00    0.1058                   2875.00    0.7053E‐02 375.00    0.9768E‐01               2900.00    0.6971E‐02 400.00    0.9057E‐01               2925.00    0.6891E‐02 425.00    0.8430E‐01               2950.00    0.6813E‐02 450.00    0.7872E‐01               2975.00    0.6736E‐02 475.00    0.7374E‐01               3000.00    0.6661E‐02 500.00    0.6929E‐01               3025.00    0.6587E‐02 525.00    0.6525E‐01               3050.00    0.6514E‐02 550.00    0.6165E‐01               3075.00    0.6443E‐02 575.00    0.5831E‐01               3100.00    0.6373E‐02 600.00    0.5531E‐01               3125.00    0.6304E‐02 625.00    0.5253E‐01               3150.00    0.6237E‐02 650.00    0.5001E‐01               3175.00    0.6170E‐02 675.00    0.4771E‐01               3200.00    0.6105E‐02 700.00    0.4553E‐01               3225.00    0.6042E‐02 725.00    0.4354E‐01               3250.00    0.5979E‐02 750.00    0.4170E‐01               3275.00    0.5917E‐02 775.00    0.4000E‐01               3300.00    0.5856E‐02 800.00    0.3839E‐01               3325.00    0.5797E‐02 825.00    0.3691E‐01               3350.00    0.5738E‐02 850.00    0.3552E‐01               3375.00    0.5680E‐02 875.00    0.3422E‐01               3400.00    0.5624E‐02 900.00    0.3299E‐01               3425.00    0.5568E‐02 925.00    0.3183E‐01               3450.00    0.5513E‐02 950.00    0.3074E‐01               3475.00    0.5527E‐02 975.00    0.2972E‐01               3500.00    0.5473E‐02 1000.00    0.2876E‐01               3525.00    0.5420E‐02 1025.00    0.2786E‐01               3550.00    0.5367E‐02 1050.00    0.2701E‐01               3575.00    0.5316E‐02 1075.00    0.2619E‐01               3600.00    0.5266E‐02 1100.00    0.2540E‐01               3625.00    0.5216E‐02 1125.00    0.2466E‐01               3650.00    0.5167E‐02 1150.00    0.2396E‐01               3675.00    0.5119E‐02 1175.00    0.2329E‐01               3700.00    0.5072E‐02 1200.00    0.2265E‐01               3725.00    0.5025E‐02 1225.00    0.2205E‐01               3750.00    0.4980E‐02 1250.00    0.2147E‐01               3775.00    0.4935E‐02 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 995
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1625 of 3153

1275.00    0.2092E‐01               3800.00    0.4890E‐02 1300.00    0.2039E‐01               3825.00    0.4846E‐02 1325.00    0.1989E‐01               3850.00    0.4803E‐02 1350.00    0.1940E‐01               3875.00    0.4761E‐02 1375.00    0.1893E‐01               3900.00    0.4719E‐02 1400.00    0.1849E‐01               3925.00    0.4678E‐02 1425.00    0.1806E‐01               3950.00    0.4638E‐02 1450.00    0.1765E‐01               3975.00    0.4598E‐02 1475.00    0.1725E‐01               4000.00    0.4559E‐02 1500.00    0.1687E‐01               4025.00    0.4520E‐02 1525.00    0.1650E‐01               4050.00    0.4482E‐02 1550.00    0.1615E‐01               4075.00    0.4444E‐02 1575.00    0.1581E‐01               4100.00    0.4407E‐02 1600.00    0.1548E‐01               4125.00    0.4371E‐02 1625.00    0.1517E‐01               4150.00    0.4335E‐02 1650.00    0.1486E‐01               4175.00    0.4299E‐02 1675.00    0.1457E‐01               4200.00    0.4264E‐02 1700.00    0.1428E‐01               4225.00    0.4230E‐02 1725.00    0.1400E‐01               4250.00    0.4196E‐02 1750.00    0.1374E‐01               4275.00    0.4162E‐02 1775.00    0.1348E‐01               4300.00    0.4129E‐02 1800.00    0.1323E‐01               4325.00    0.4097E‐02 1825.00    0.1299E‐01               4350.00    0.4065E‐02 1850.00    0.1276E‐01               4375.00    0.4033E‐02 1875.00    0.1253E‐01               4400.00    0.4001E‐02 1900.00    0.1231E‐01               4425.00    0.3971E‐02 1925.00    0.1210E‐01               4450.00    0.3940E‐02 1950.00    0.1189E‐01               4475.00    0.3910E‐02 1975.00    0.1169E‐01               4500.00    0.3880E‐02 2000.00    0.1150E‐01               4525.00    0.3851E‐02 2025.00    0.1131E‐01               4550.00    0.3822E‐02 2050.00    0.1112E‐01               4575.00    0.3794E‐02 2075.00    0.1094E‐01               4600.00    0.3765E‐02 2100.00    0.1077E‐01               4625.00    0.3738E‐02 2125.00    0.1060E‐01               4650.00    0.3710E‐02 2150.00    0.1044E‐01               4675.00    0.3683E‐02 2175.00    0.1028E‐01               4700.00    0.3656E‐02 2200.00    0.1012E‐01               4725.00    0.3630E‐02 2225.00    0.9966E‐02               4750.00    0.3604E‐02 2250.00    0.9816E‐02               4775.00    0.3578E‐02 2275.00    0.9671E‐02               4800.00    0.3552E‐02 2300.00    0.9529E‐02               4825.00    0.3527E‐02 2325.00    0.9391E‐02               4850.00    0.3502E‐02 2350.00    0.9256E‐02               4875.00    0.3478E‐02 2375.00    0.9124E‐02               4900.00    0.3454E‐02 2400.00    0.8996E‐02               4925.00    0.3430E‐02 2425.00    0.8871E‐02               4950.00    0.3406E‐02 2450.00    0.8749E‐02               4975.00    0.3383E‐02 2475.00    0.8631E‐02               5000.00    0.3360E‐02 2500.00    0.8515E‐02
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 996
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1626 of 3153

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM      SCALED      SCALED      SCALED      SCALED 1‐HOUR      3‐HOUR      8‐HOUR     24‐HOUR      ANNUAL
CALCULATION          CONC        CONC        CONC        CONC        CONC PROCEDURE         (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN       0.2610      0.2610      0.2610      0.2610         N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE        198.00 meters
IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY   0.2006      0.2006      0.2006      0.2006         N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE          1.00 meters
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 997
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1627 of 3153

AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112                                      10/29/25 13:03:02
TITLE: Trumble and Watson, Operation
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE:         0.144E‐02 g/s             0.114E‐01 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE:           0.207E‐07 g/(s‐m2)        0.164E‐06 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT:                       3.00 meters               9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE:           373.00 meters            1223.75 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE:          186.50 meters             611.88 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:        1.50 meters               4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN:                   URBAN
POPULATION:                      117041
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =          5000. meters             16404. feet ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo        SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000    0.9245      20   200.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Attachment E
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 998
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1628 of 3153

**********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:       0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:          Winter
ALBEDO:                  0.35
BOWEN RATIO:             1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:       1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED
METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 10  10 01
H0     U*     W*  DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH  M‐O LEN    Z0  BOWEN ALBEDO  REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐  ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50 HT
REF TA     HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0   310.0    2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM                             MAXIMUM
DIST     1‐HR CONC                  DIST     1‐HR CONC
(m)      (ug/m3)                    (m)      (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐               ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐

1.00    0.7157                   2525.00    0.2997E‐01
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 999
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1629 of 3153

25.00    0.7531                   2550.00    0.2957E‐01

50.00    0.7883                   2575.00    0.2918E‐01

75.00    0.8202                   2600.00    0.2881E‐01 100.00    0.8491                   2625.00    0.2844E‐01 125.00    0.8756                   2650.00    0.2807E‐01 150.00    0.9001                   2675.00    0.2772E‐01 175.00    0.9232                   2700.00    0.2737E‐01 200.00    0.9245                   2725.00    0.2704E‐01 225.00    0.7193                   2750.00    0.2671E‐01 250.00    0.5823                   2775.00    0.2638E‐01 275.01    0.5034                   2800.00    0.2607E‐01 300.00    0.4495                   2825.00    0.2576E‐01 325.00    0.4107                   2850.00    0.2545E‐01 350.00    0.3773                   2875.00    0.2516E‐01 375.00    0.3484                   2900.00    0.2486E‐01 400.00    0.3231                   2925.00    0.2458E‐01 425.00    0.3007                   2950.00    0.2430E‐01 450.00    0.2808                   2975.00    0.2403E‐01 475.00    0.2630                   3000.00    0.2376E‐01 500.00    0.2471                   3025.00    0.2349E‐01 525.00    0.2327                   3050.00    0.2324E‐01 550.00    0.2199                   3075.00    0.2298E‐01 575.00    0.2080                   3100.00    0.2273E‐01 600.00    0.1973                   3125.00    0.2248E‐01 625.00    0.1874                   3150.00    0.2224E‐01 650.00    0.1784                   3175.00    0.2201E‐01 675.00    0.1702                   3200.00    0.2178E‐01 700.00    0.1624                   3225.00    0.2155E‐01 725.00    0.1553                   3250.00    0.2133E‐01 750.00    0.1487                   3275.00    0.2111E‐01 775.00    0.1427                   3300.00    0.2089E‐01 800.00    0.1369                   3325.00    0.2068E‐01 825.00    0.1316                   3350.00    0.2047E‐01 850.00    0.1267                   3375.00    0.2026E‐01 875.00    0.1220                   3400.00    0.2006E‐01 900.00    0.1177                   3425.00    0.1986E‐01 925.00    0.1135                   3450.00    0.1966E‐01 950.00    0.1097                   3475.00    0.1971E‐01 975.00    0.1060                   3500.00    0.1952E‐01 1000.00    0.1026                   3525.00    0.1933E‐01 1025.00    0.9938E‐01               3550.00    0.1914E‐01 1050.00    0.9634E‐01               3575.00    0.1896E‐01 1075.00    0.9340E‐01               3600.00    0.1878E‐01 1100.00    0.9060E‐01               3625.00    0.1860E‐01 1125.00    0.8795E‐01               3650.00    0.1843E‐01 1150.00    0.8544E‐01               3675.00    0.1826E‐01 1175.00    0.8306E‐01               3700.00    0.1809E‐01 1200.00    0.8080E‐01               3725.00    0.1792E‐01 1225.00    0.7864E‐01               3750.00    0.1776E‐01 1250.00    0.7659E‐01               3775.00    0.1760E‐01 Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 1000
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1630 of 3153

1275.00    0.7463E‐01               3800.00    0.1744E‐01 1300.00    0.7274E‐01               3825.00    0.1729E‐01 1325.00    0.7093E‐01               3850.00    0.1713E‐01 1350.00    0.6919E‐01               3875.00    0.1698E‐01 1375.00    0.6753E‐01               3900.00    0.1683E‐01 1400.00    0.6594E‐01               3925.00    0.1669E‐01 1425.00    0.6441E‐01               3950.00    0.1654E‐01 1450.00    0.6294E‐01               3975.00    0.1640E‐01 1475.00    0.6152E‐01               4000.00    0.1626E‐01 1500.00    0.6016E‐01               4025.00    0.1612E‐01 1525.00    0.5886E‐01               4050.00    0.1599E‐01 1550.00    0.5760E‐01               4075.00    0.1585E‐01 1575.00    0.5639E‐01               4100.00    0.1572E‐01 1600.00    0.5523E‐01               4125.00    0.1559E‐01 1625.00    0.5411E‐01               4150.00    0.1546E‐01 1650.00    0.5301E‐01               4175.00    0.1533E‐01 1675.00    0.5196E‐01               4200.00    0.1521E‐01 1700.00    0.5094E‐01               4225.00    0.1509E‐01 1725.00    0.4995E‐01               4250.00    0.1497E‐01 1750.00    0.4900E‐01               4275.00    0.1485E‐01 1775.00    0.4808E‐01               4300.00    0.1473E‐01 1800.00    0.4719E‐01               4325.00    0.1461E‐01 1825.00    0.4633E‐01               4350.00    0.1450E‐01 1850.00    0.4550E‐01               4375.00    0.1438E‐01 1875.00    0.4469E‐01               4400.00    0.1427E‐01 1900.00    0.4391E‐01               4425.00    0.1416E‐01 1925.00    0.4315E‐01               4450.00    0.1405E‐01 1950.00    0.4242E‐01               4475.00    0.1395E‐01 1975.00    0.4170E‐01               4500.00    0.1384E‐01 2000.00    0.4101E‐01               4525.00    0.1374E‐01 2025.00    0.4033E‐01               4550.00    0.1363E‐01 2050.00    0.3967E‐01               4575.00    0.1353E‐01 2075.00    0.3903E‐01               4600.00    0.1343E‐01 2100.00    0.3841E‐01               4625.00    0.1333E‐01 2125.00    0.3781E‐01               4650.00    0.1323E‐01 2150.00    0.3722E‐01               4675.00    0.1314E‐01 2175.00    0.3665E‐01               4700.00    0.1304E‐01 2200.00    0.3609E‐01               4725.00    0.1295E‐01 2225.00    0.3555E‐01               4750.00    0.1285E‐01 2250.00    0.3501E‐01               4775.00    0.1276E‐01 2275.00    0.3449E‐01               4800.00    0.1267E‐01 2300.00    0.3399E‐01               4825.00    0.1258E‐01 2325.00    0.3349E‐01               4850.00    0.1249E‐01 2350.00    0.3301E‐01               4875.00    0.1240E‐01 2375.00    0.3254E‐01               4900.00    0.1232E‐01 2400.00    0.3209E‐01               4925.00    0.1223E‐01 2425.00    0.3164E‐01               4950.00    0.1215E‐01 2450.00    0.3121E‐01               4975.00    0.1207E‐01 2475.00    0.3078E‐01               5000.00    0.1198E‐01 2500.00    0.3037E‐01
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 1001
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1631 of 3153

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM      SCALED      SCALED      SCALED      SCALED 1‐HOUR      3‐HOUR      8‐HOUR     24‐HOUR      ANNUAL
CALCULATION          CONC        CONC        CONC        CONC        CONC PROCEDURE         (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3)     (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN       0.9308      0.9308      0.9308      0.9308         N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE        198.00 meters
IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY   0.7157      0.7157      0.7157      0.7157         N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE          1.00 meters
Item Title: 11.1
Trumble and Watson Warehouse Appeals
Item Page Number: 1002
Menifee Mayor and City Council
July 15, 2026
Page
1632 of 3153

1 2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
• Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization, Investigation and Remediation Strategies • Industrial Stormwater Compliance
• CEQA Review
• Expert Testimony
Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist, P.G.

California Certified Hydrogeologist, C.Hg.

Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

← All documents from this meeting