Milpitas City Council
May 17, 2022

sites are potentially discovered during project construction activities, the IS-MND should identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

In addition, DTSC recommends that the following issues be evaluated in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the IS-MND:

1. Refiners in the United States started adding lead compounds to gasoline in the 1920s in order to boost octane levels and improve engine performance.

This practice did not officially end until 1992 when lead was banned as a fuel additive in California. Tailpipe emissions from automobiles using leaded gasoline contained lead and resulted in aerially deposited lead (ADL) being deposited in and along roadways throughout the state. ADL-contaminated soils still exist along roadsides and medians and can also be found underneath some existing road surfaces due to past construction activities. Due to the potential for ADL-contaminated soil DTSC, recommends collecting soil samples for lead analysis prior to performing any intrusive activities for the project described in the IS-MND.

2. If any sites within the project area or sites located within the vicinity of the project have been used or are suspected of having been used for mining activities, proper investigation for mine waste should be discussed in the IS-MND. DTSC recommends that any project sites with current and/or former mining operations onsite or in the project site area should be evaluated for mine waste according to DTSC’s 1998 Abandoned Mine Land Mines Preliminary Assessment Handbook.

3. If buildings or other structures are to be demolished on any project sites included in the proposed project, surveys should be conducted for the presence of lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC’s 2006 Interim Guidance Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Contamination from Lead Based Paint, Termiticides, and Electrical Transformers.

4. If any projects initiated as part of the proposed project require the importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC’s 2001 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material.
815
Item # 18.

Ms. Fanny Yu
April 18, 2022

5. If any sites included as part of the proposed project have been used for agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the IS-MND. DTSC recommends the current and former agricultural lands be evaluated in accordance with DTSC’s 2008 Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision).

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS-MND. Should you need any assistance with an environmental investigation, please visit DTSC’s Site Mitigation and Restoration Program page to apply for lead agency oversight. Additional information regarding voluntary agreements with DTSC can be found at DTSC’s Brownfield website.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 255-3582 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Brian McAloon
Project Manager
Site Evaluation and Remediation Unit
Site Mitigation and Restoration Program
Department of Toxic Substances Control
cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Mr. Dave Kereazis
Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
816
Item # 18.

TRAIL, PEDESTRIAN, AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE
455 East Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, CA 94087 | 408.586.3000 Phone | www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
To: Office of the County Clerk
County of Santa Clara
County Government Center
70 West Hedding Street, E. Wing, 1st Floor
San José, CA 95110
From: City of Milpitas
Planning Department
455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, CA 95035
Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code Project Title: City of Milpitas Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Project Location: Milpitas, Santa Clara County
State Clearinghouse Number: 2022030515
Lead Agency Contact Person: Fanny Yu Area Code/Telephone: (408) 586-3318 Project Description: The proposed City of Milpitas Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan is intended to increase walking and biking in the city of Milpitas through the provision and enhancement of safe and convenient active modes of travel. The Plan has two basic elements: 1) a vision, goals, and policies to support a safe and expansive active transportation network to improve active transportation choices, and 2) a comprehensive list of recommended improvements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

This is to advise that the City of Milpitas approved the above described project on May 17, 2022, and made the following determinations regarding the proposed project:

1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project.

4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Plan was adopted for this project.

5. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project.

6. Findings were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15091). 817
Item # 18.

This is to certify that the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Initial Study, and record of project approval are available tothe General Public at the following addresses:

Milpitas Public Library
160 North Main Street
Milpitas, CA 95035
(408) 262-1171
City of Milpitas, Planning Department
455 East Calaveras Blvd.

Milpitas, CA 95035
(408) 586-3279
Planning Director
Ned Thomas Date Title
818
Item # 18.

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS ADOPTING TRAILS, PEDESTRIAN, AND BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN, PROJECT NO. 3448 WHEREAS, Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update, No. 3448 (Master Plan Update) is included in the approved 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Program. The Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update includes an analysis of the conditions of City trails, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, recommendations and estimated costs for improvements, maintenance practices, as well as program recommendations; and
WHEREAS, staff has incorporated Council direction from past meetings into the updated Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update document, and it is ready for adoption by the City Council.

The document includes an assessment of existing condition, needs assessment, goals, short-term and long-term improvement recommendations, and implementation and funding strategies; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council hereby adopts a resolution to adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update, Project No. 3448
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of May 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Michael Mutallipassi, City Attorney
819
Item # 18.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Certifying Election Results and Adding the Property Located at 308 Sango Court into Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301) Category: Consent Calendar-Community Development
Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Following receipt of election results from the City Clerk, adopt a Resolution Certifying Election Results and Adding the Property Located at 308 Sango Court into Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22).

Background:

On August 5, 2021, the City Council approved Site Development Permit No. SD19-0014, Density Bonus No.

DB19-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR19-0029 and Environmental Assessment No. EA19-0007 for an 85- unit residential project with ground-floor parking garage and 20,788 square feet of public and private open space located at 308 Sango Court.

The project is located on a 1.11-acre site (the “Property”) within the Transit Area Specific Plan (“TASP”) area.

This project is known as 308 Sango Court Residential Project, and the developer is Pacific West Communities, Inc. (“Developer”). A condition of approval for the project requires that, prior to issuance of a building permit, the site shall be annexed into Communities Facilities District 2008-1 (CFD 2008-1) to allow for the levy of special taxes to fund public services that benefit the development.

Analysis:

Project (Parcel A of Parcel Map filed for record in the office of the recorder of the County of Santa Clara, California on January 14, 1980, in Book 457 of Maps, at Page 27) is subject to annexation into the Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (CFD 2008-1). The City has on file a Certificate of Registrar of Voters from the County of Santa Clara certifying that there are no registered voters residing within the boundaries of the proposed CFD Annexation No. 22 for this development. The Developer is the sole property owner, and on May 12, 2022 the property owner was scheduled to vote on agreeing to the proposed Annexation No. 22.

The resolution attached hereto documents the results of the election on annexation into CFD 2008-1.

Annexation into CFD 2008-1 is subject to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, commencing with Section 53311 of the Government Code. While the Act has a number of requirements for annexation and imposition of the special tax, the Developer (as the sole landowner within the annexation territory) has agreed to waive many of the formalities. A copy of the waiver executed by the Developer is on file with the City Clerk.

Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1:

Deny Annexation of Project to CFD 2008-1.

Pros: None
820
Item # 19.

Cons: Denying the Annexation of Project into the CFD No. 2008-1 would prevent the City from levying special taxes on this parcel, in order to fund public services.

Reason not recommended: To adequately fund the perpetual maintenance of improvements and services within CFD No. 2008-1, staff recommends adoption of a resolution certifying election results and adding Project to CFD 2008-1.

Fiscal Impact:

Adding the Property to the CFD No. 2008-1 would allow the City to levy special taxes on this parcel to fund public services to support the development.

California Environmental Quality Act:

This project is covered under the scope of activities approved under the Transit Area Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, SCH2006032091, which was certified by City Council on June 3, 2008. On October 16, 2018, the City Council found that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (projects consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning); CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (residential projects consistent with a specific plan); and CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 (projects within the scope of a program EIR).

Recommendation:

Following receipt of election results from the City Clerk, adopt a resolution certifying election results and adding Parcel A to Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22).

Attachments:

1. Resolution
821
Item # 19.

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF AN ELECTION AND ADDING TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2008-1 (PUBLIC SERVICES)
(Annexation No. 22)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Milpitas (the “City Council”) has previously formed Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Public Services) (“CFD No. 2008-1”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), as amended, for the purpose of financing certain Public Services; and WHEREAS, acting pursuant to the Act, the City Council also authorized by the adoption of Resolution No. 8601 (the “Resolution Authorizing Future Annexation”) the annexation in the future of territory to CFD No. 2008-1, such territory designated as Future Annexation Area, Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (the “Future Annexation Area”); and WHEREAS, at this time the unanimous consent to the annexation of certain territory located within the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2008-1 has been received from the property owner of such territory, and such territory has been designated as Annexation No. 16 (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Territory for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the election date established for the Territory, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified elector of the Territory shall be the "landowner," as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f), of such Territory and such landowner who is the owner of record as of the applicable election date, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of the parcel of land that landowner owns within such Territory; and WHEREAS, the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes on the Territory to the qualified elector thereof and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified elector of the Territory; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Milpitas has caused a ballot to be distributed to the qualified elector of the Territory, has received and canvassed such ballot and made a report to the City Council regarding the results of such canvass, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, at this time the measure voted upon and such measure did receive the favorable vote of the qualified elector of the Territory, and the City Council desires to declare the results of the election; and WHEREAS, a map showing the Territory and designated as Annexation Map No. 22 (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, has been submitted to this legislative body.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas, California, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2008-1, hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct.

2. Findings. This legislative body does hereby further determine as follows:

A. The unanimous consent as described in the recitals hereto to the annexation of the Territory to CFD No. 2008-1 has been given by the owner of the Territory and such consent shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Milpitas.

B. Less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Territory for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the election date established for the each of the parcels located within the Territory, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified elector for the Territory shall be the "landowner" of the Territory as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f). 822
Item # 19.
2 Resolution No. ____
C. The qualified elector of the Territory has voted in favor of the levy of special taxes on the Territory upon its annexation to CFD No. 2008-1.

3. Territory. The boundaries and parcels of property within the Territory and on which special taxes will be levied in order to pay for the costs and expenses of authorized Public Services are shown on the Annexation Map as submitted to and hereby approved by this legislative body.

4. Declaration of Annexation. This legislative body does hereby determine and declare that the Territory, and each parcel therein, is now added to and becomes a part of CFD No. 2008-1. The City Council, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2008-1, is hereby empowered to levy the authorized special tax within the Territory.

5. Notice. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, notice shall be given as follows:

A. A copy of the Annexation Map as approved shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder no later than fifteen (15) days after the date of adoption of this Resolution.

B. An Amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien (Notice of Annexation) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder no later than fifteen (15) days after the date of adoption of this Resolution.

6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of __________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Wendy Wood, City Clerk
APPROVED:

Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
823
Item # 19.

Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL

AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the

CITY OF MILPITAS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2008-1
(PUBLIC SERVICES)

SPECIAL ELECTION
ANNEXATION NO. 22
held on the election date established for each parcel located within the territory included in Annexation No. 22.

I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in the area proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 for or against the Measure are full, true and correct.

VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION 1: YES
NO
WITNESS my hand this day of , 20__.

WENDY WOOD, CITY CLERK

ELECTION OFFICIAL

CITY OF MILPITAS

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
824
Item # 19.

Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B

ANNEXATION MAP
825
Item # 19.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Receive Progress Report on The Work Completed and Existing Conditions Analysis from Ascent Environmental and Staff on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, Discuss Plan Objectives and Priorities, and Provide Direction on Key Planning Concepts and Land Use Strategies (Staff Contact: Ned Thomas, Planning Director, 408-586-3273 and Jay Lee, Principal Planner, 408-586-3077) Category: Community Development
Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Receive progress report on the work completed and existing conditions analysis from Ascent Environmental and staff on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, discuss Plan objectives and priorities, and provide direction on key planning concepts and land use strategies.

Background:

The Milpitas Midtown Specific Plan was originally adopted by City Council in 2002 to maximize land use, transportation, and economic opportunities along the City’s historic Main Street and to energize and catalyze mixed-use, transit-oriented development in the Midtown area, also known as the “heart” of Milpitas. Since adoption of the current Midtown Specific Plan, little of the community’s vision for this area has been realized, and many potential development sites remain vacant and underutilized, especially along Main Street. As part of the update process, the Midtown Specific Plan will be renamed the “Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan” and will provide a new vision and strategic policy framework to guide redevelopment and reinvestment in three focus areas and transform this important gateway into an attractive and vibrant destination for the City and the region.

In preparation for the update process, City staff partnered with local nonprofit Catalyze SV to facilitate a series of three community conversations from June to April 2021 to discuss the revitalization of Main Street with Milpitas’ stakeholders. The first conversation focused on April 29th, 2021 focused on business, the second conversation on May 27th, 2021 focused on housing, and the third conversation on June 24th, 2021 focused on history and culture.

On September 21, 2021, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a master funding agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to receive $500,000 in grant funding through the Priority Development Area Planning Grant Program and a professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental for consultant services to prepare the Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan.

The work completed thus far is summarized below.

1. Kick-Off Meeting and Site Tour: The project team held a virtual kick-off meeting on October 26, 2021 to initiate the project and discuss the City’s goals and objectives, team roles and responsibilities, project area context and efforts under way, and Plan and focus area boundaries.

2. Material Review and Preliminary Mapping: The consultant reviewed relevant existing and inprogress studies and created a series of maps that depict the local context.

3. Existing Conditions Assessment: The consultant assessed the physical context of the Plan area with a focus on identifying preliminary opportunities and constraints related to land use and development.

Completed deliverables include the Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis, Market Study, and Transportation Analysis.
826
Item # 20.

4. Community Engagement Strategy: The project team prepared a Community Engagement Strategy, which identifies roles and responsibilities, timelines for outreach activities, and a detailed, comprehensive communication strategy for creating awareness and excitement about the project.

5. Pop-Up Event: City staff and the consultant attended the City-sponsored Holiday Magic event on Main Street on December 17 and 18, 2021. The team provided an aerial image of the project area, comment cards, and business cards to provide an opportunity to provide feedback. The team spoke with approximately 25 people and received generally positive feedback and interest related to the project.

Feedback included excitement about Main Street being a “real downtown” and a “place to go”, need for improvements to make Main Street attractive, desire for retail shops and restaurants, and support for housing, especially affordable housing, along Main Street.

6. Council Ad-Hoc Main Street Revitalization Subcommittee: City staff presented the key findings of the Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis to the Council Ad-Hoc Main Street Revitalization Subcommittee at its meeting on April 12, 2022. Staff received feedback to thoughtfully incorporate new housing along Main Street while maintaining and strengthening the neighborhood commercial character and find solutions to provide better parking opportunities throughout the corridor.

Attached to this agenda report is an informational memorandum from staff summarizing the key findings from the Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis, Market Study, and Transportation Analysis. During this study session with Council, the project team will review the work completed and provide a summary of the informational memorandum. The project team will also facilitate discussion with Council to further clarify objectives and priorities for future development of the Plan area. The input from this study session will allow staff and the consultant to refine the plan concepts and further develop the policy framework for the GatewayMain Street Specific Plan.

Analysis:

A brief overview of the Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis, Market Study, and Transportation Analysis is provided below. Refer to the informational memorandum from staff (attached) for a more detailed summary of the key findings.

Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis
The Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis maps the proposed focus areas and neighborhoods, describes the urban form and character, and identifies the existing and planned land uses and zoning, underutilized parcels, opportunity sites, existing and planned environmental features including open space and parks, and known eligible and designated historic and cultural resources in the Plan area. The analysis also includes an overview of the land use, open space, and transportation opportunities and constraints in the Plan area.

Market Study
The Market Study evaluates the market support for new development in the Plan area based on current and future anticipated market conditions. The Market Study identifies the inventory in the appropriate market area, analyzes data related to key metrics, and analyzes the impact of national and regional trends on demand for each major land use (residential, office, and retail). The Market Study also identifies opportunities and constraints to achieving the desired mix of uses in the Plan area and recommends strategies to leverage these opportunities and address these constraints.

Transportation Analysis
The Transportation Analysis reviews the Milpitas Bicycle/Pedestrian and Trails Plan and other relevant documents affecting transportation policies and infrastructure in the Plan area and maps the street network, bicycle and pedestrian network, transit routes and services, and key gaps or missing links in the overall transportation network. The Transportation Analysis also identifies the existing roadway and intersection volumes and levels of service in the Plan area and analyzes the resident and worker travel characteristics for the City and Plan area.

Next Steps
Following the Council study session, the consultant will prepare the Public Infrastructure and Utilities Analysis (in-progress) and Affordable Housing and Community Benefits Analysis, which will complete the Existing 827
Item # 20.

Conditions Assessment phase of the project.

The project team will also build upon the Main St. Revitalization Community Conversations and Holiday Magic Pop-Up Event and initiate the next phase of the public outreach and engagement process, which will include completing the following tasks in the upcoming months.

1. Project Branding and Communication Materials: Create a logo, tagline, font, and color palette, which will be used to create communication materials and develop a more robust project website.

2. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Hold the first of four TAC meetings to share the project scope and timeline and query the TAC for feedback on project objectives, area boundaries, and known or potential issues within the Plan area. The TAC will be comprised of staff from various City departments and other agencies such as the Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority.

3. Stakeholder Interviews: Conduct six stakeholder interviews in small group settings to receive feedback from business and property owners, neighborhood associations, developers and real estate professionals, community groups, and other stakeholders.

4. Community Workshop: Host an interactive Community Workshop to provide the community and decision makers an opportunity to share feedback regarding the project.

5. Council Study Sessions: Return to Council to report back on the results of the public outreach and engagement and receive direction on the Preferred Plan/Strategies.

Fiscal Impact:

This is an informational item. As such, there is no fiscal impact.

California Environmental Quality Act:

This report represents ongoing work on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan; it is anticipated that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared for consideration prior to Plan adoption.

Recommendation:

Receive progress report on the work completed and existing conditions analysis from Ascent Environmental and staff on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, discuss Plan objectives and priorities, and provide direction on key planning concepts and land use strategies.

Attachment:

1. Informational Memorandum from Staff
828
Item # 20.

MEMORANDUM
Planning Department
DATE: May 17, 2022
TO: Mayor Rich Tran and City Council
THROUGH: Steve McHarris, City Manager
FROM: Jay Lee, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan Existing Conditions Report This informational memorandum highlights the key findings from three reports completed by the consultant team as part of the Existing Conditions Assessment: (1) Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis, (2) Market Study, and (3) Transportation Analysis.

Land Use, Zoning and Urban Form Analysis
The Specific Plan Update proposes a new Plan boundary to better reflect the current Plan area context and align with the ongoing Milpitas Metro Specific Plan Update. The area south of Great Mall Parkway, which includes several sites that have recently redeveloped and/or will be included in the Metro Plan area, has been removed from the Plan area to allow for greater focus on redeveloping and planning for the new focus areas along Main Street, Calaveras Boulevard, and Abbott Avenue. Two residential neighborhoods have been included in the Plan boundary to establish a more coherent Plan area and one nonresidential area has been included to maximize opportunities for redevelopment. See Figure 1 for the proposed Plan boundary adjustments.

Land Use and Development Regulations
The key findings related to land use and development regulations are below:

1. Density and Intensity: The currently allowed densities in the Plan area are not always aligned with the densities envisioned in the new General Plan and are obstacles to redevelopment. Opportunities to carefully increase densities while protecting existing neighborhoods should be evaluated to support infill development and corridor activation.

2. Intensity and Height: Three-story height limits are a major development constraint along Main Street. Building height standards should be aligned with allowed densities to allow for redevelopment.

3. Front Setbacks and Street Activation: The existing building setback pattern along Main Street is inconsistent. Setback and design treatment standards should be place-based to create special places throughout the Plan area and activate street frontages along Main Street.
829
Item # 20.
2 Figure 1: Proposed Plan Boundary Adjustments
830
Item # 20.
3 Urban Form Analysis
The key findings related to urban form are below:

1. Existing “On-the-Ground” Land Uses: The Plan area includes an eclectic mix of uses with considerable opportunities for new redevelopment.

2. Block Pattern: Existing blocks along Main Street are long and currently unconducive to walking. North Main Street is the exception with recent improvements that include wide sidewalks, narrower streets, and improved pedestrian crossings.

3. Building Age and Historic Resources: The majority of structures were constructed between 1970 and 2000. Pre-1941 development, and some concentration of midcentury buildings, are present at the crossroads of Main Street and Serra Way, along Main Street north of Tom Evatt Park, and in shopping centers along Abbott Avenue and Serra Center. Although many historic assets have been lost or changed over time, they may be commemorated with markers as part of the streetscape and signage approach.

4. Social, Cultural, and Community Anchors: The Plan area is home to a mix of religious, cultural, educational, and other public uses that converge within the Main Street corridor.

5. Parks, Open Space and Trails: Public parks, open space, and trails contribute to the public realm character of the community and have opportunities to be improved as new development occurs.

6. Property Ownership: Land ownership in the Plan area is extremely fragmented with numerous landowners owning small, highly constrained parcels. Large land holdings and publicly owned parcels with vacant buildings or land should be leveraged as catalyst sites.

7. Recent and Approved Projects: There are a limited number of projects in the current pipeline, including one mixed-use development project, a new veterinary clinic, and an approved housing development project.

8. Existing and Planned Access: The public street network in the Plan area is limited due to large sites, as well as edges such as I-880 and multiple rail corridors. The existing bicycle network is limited through the Plan area, with extensive improvements identified in the Draft Milpitas Pedestrian/Bicycle and Trails Plan. The Plan area is well-served by VTA local bus service.

Opportunities and Constraints
For the purpose of establishing priorities for redevelopment and improvements, the Plan area has been organized into three areas:

1. Focus Areas, which represent the major opportunity areas to direct new infill and growth;

2. Neighborhoods, which are to be considered preservation areas but can benefit from area improvements and support local shops, businesses, and activities; and

3. Future Study Areas, which are potential future opportunity sites subject to further study if and when these facilities are no longer needed for their current purpose.

Three focus areas are proposed to establish priority areas for redevelopment and provide a more focused strategy given the large Plan area: (1) Main Street, (2) Calaveras Gateway, and (3) I-880/Abbott Avenue.
831
Item # 20.
4 Figure 2: Focus Areas, Neighborhoods and Future Study Areas 832
Item # 20.
5 The Main Street focus area presents opportunities for a retail center on the northern end of the corridor and mixed-use redevelopment on vacant or underutilized sites further south. Main Street is envisioned as a walkable, social, and cultural center for Milpitas.

Figure 3: Main Street Focus Area
The Calaveras Gateway focus area presents a significant redevelopment opportunity at the Serra Center to reimagine an aging shopping center at a highly visible entry location. This focus area is envisioned as a major gateway to Milpitas and destination for both residents and visitors alike.

Figure 4: Calaveras Gateway Focus Area
833
Item # 20.
6 The I-880/Abbott Avenue focus area, which is home to an office/commercial center north of Calaveras Boulevard and a business center south of Calaveras Boulevard, presents an opportunity to establish a more cohesive and attractive employment center with improved connections with the surrounding Plan area.

Figure 5: I-880/Abbott Avenue Focus Area
The key opportunities and constraints in the Plan area are below:

1. Main Street has a long history that should be more publicly displayed through in-ground inlays at historic crossroads and interpretive signage/plaques identifying key resources.

2. A large number of historic, cultural, and educational facilities are located throughout the Plan area, making Main Street an existing destination for the community to gather.

3. There is a need for public gathering spaces to bring the community together for events at Main Street on a more regular basis.

4. Focus areas include opportunity sites with vacant land and underutilized parcels, which can serve as development catalysts for new mixed-use development.

5. Block sizes along Main Street are very long and auto oriented. Cross-block connections are needed to reduce block sizes and facilitate walkability.

6. There is an opportunity for urban parks, plazas, small open spaces, and multi-use trail connections (i.e., Tom Evatt Park and Lower Penitencia Creek Trail) to activate streets.

7. Access and connectivity throughout the Plan Area are challenged by connectivity barriers and curb cuts along main Street.

8. Streetscape improvements are inconsistent along the length of the corridor and lack branding to support a distinguishable identity for the Plan area. 834
Item # 20.
7 Market Study
The Market Study evaluates the market support for new development in the Plan area based on current and future anticipated market conditions, identifies opportunities and constraints to achieving the desired mix of uses, and recommends strategies to leverage these opportunities and address these constraints. The key findings are below.

Location, Urban Form, and Focus Area Opportunities
The irregular and fragmented parcels and ownerships along Main Street present a challenge for aggregating parcels to accommodate large, investment-grade development projects.

Instead, small-scale development should be planned and encouraged.

Demographics and Economy

1. Milpitas has a large base of highly educated and affluent consumers that would be attractive to new retailers in the Plan area.

2. These consumers are a prime target for new forms of specialty and experiential retail (i.e., places that offer a unique “sense of place” and consumers seek out to spend their discretionary time and dollars).

3. Milpitas’ rich racial and ethnic diversity supports specialty food retail, including ethnic markets and eating/drinking establishments.

4. The increase in Class A rental multifamily residential developments suggests additional demand for eating, drinking, and entertainment establishments.

Real Estate Market Trends
Residential

1. Recent construction activity, net absorption, and rent trends demonstrate continued strong demand for rental housing.

2. Smaller parcels along Main Street south of Serra Way and north of Curtis Avenue would be appropriate places for new lower density housing.

3. Recent residential projects in the Plan area have mainly consisted of multifamily apartment projects on large sites with densities ranging from 60 to 120 units per acre.

Maximum building heights need to be 5 to 7 stories to accommodate this density.

Larger parcels (or aggregations of smaller parcels) in the Calaveras Gateway and I880/Abbott Avenue focus areas would be the most appropriate locations for new, highdensity residential development.

Retail

1. Due to narrow parcels and traffic volumes, new retail on Main Street should offer a walkable multi-block retail node instead of a long strip of ground floor retail.

2. The best location for new retail would comprise the eastern portion of the Calaveras Gateway focus area and the northern portion of the Main Street focus area (north of Junipero Drive) with Serra way as the focal point. This area is walkable, contains parcels large enough for medium-to-large scale redevelopment, and easy access to Calaveras Boulevard and Main Street. This area would also be supported by a large residential population that lives nearby.
835
Item # 20.
8 Figure 6: Potential Retail Node
Figure 7: Retail Buildings in Milpitas and the Plan Area 836
Item # 20.
9 Office

1. Much of the Plan area is more than a half-mile from the VTA’s Alder Light Rail Station and Milpitas BART Station, making the Plan area less attractive for new Class A office development.

2. However, portions of the I-880/Abbott Avenue and Calaveras Gateway focus areas with frontage along Calaveras Boulevard and I-880 have high visibility and would make these sites attractive to Class A office development.

3. In other areas, small-scale Class B office in a residential mixed-use project may be feasible by targeting tenants serving the local residents and businesses.

Figure 8: Office Buildings in Milpitas and the Plan Area 837
Item # 20.
10 Transportation Analysis
The Transportation Analysis describes the transportation conditions in the Plan area and identifies potential issues and opportunities that can be addressed in the Plan.

Roadway Network
The roadway system in the Plan area consists of federal highways, state highways, county expressways, arterial roadways, collector roadways, and local roadways. Planned roadway improvements include the Calaveras Boulevard Widening Project (CIP #4258) and Montague Expressway Widening Project (CIP #4179).

Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
The City recently published the Draft Milpitas Pedestrian/Bicycle and Trails Plan, which includes a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s existing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and proposes improvements based on a needs evaluation, prioritization, and feasibility assessment.

Streets with missing sidewalks or sidewalks on only one side include:

1. Carlo Street (no south side sidewalk),

2. Serra Street (sidewalk gaps on south side), and

3. Calaveras Boulevard (no south side sidewalk between Carlo Street and Milpitas Boulevard).

The Draft Master Plan proposes bicycle improvements along Main Street, Abel Avenue, Calaveras Boulevard, and Great Mall Parkway.

Transit Service
The Plan area is served by several transit services including VTA, AC Transit, ACE, and BART.

Parking and Curbside Uses
In addition to residential neighborhood roadways where on-street parking is generally allowed, roadways in the Plan area that generally provide on-street parking include:

1. South Main Street (alternate sides between Serra Way and Great Mall Parkway and limited north of Serra Way),

2. Weller Lane (south side only),

3. Corning Avenue between South Abel Street and South Main Street (both sides),

4. Curtis Avenue (except on north side between South Abel Street and South Main Street), and

5. Thompson Street (both sides).

Many sites provide off-street surface parking lots. Structured parking is provided for the Valley Health Center and Milpitas Library on North Main Street north of Serra Way.

Collision History
From 2015 to 2019, there were 241 collisions in the Plan area. 73% of all collisions occurred at an intersection. The intersections with the most collisions were Abbott Avenue at Calaveras Boulevard and Thompson Street at Great Mall parkway. The most common causes for collisions were unsafe speeds and violation of traffic signals and signs. See Figure 9 for the collision data from 2015 to 2019.
838
Item # 20.
11 Figure 9: Collision Data from 2015 to 2019
839
Item # 20.
12 Issues and Opportunities
Key transportation challenges in the Plan area include:

1. Connectivity barriers due to cul-de-sacs, railroads, and grade separations;

2. Long blocks and frequent curb cuts along Main Street Proximity to VTA light-rail and BART just south of the Plan area; and

3. Distribution of parking across multiple small lots along Main Street.

Key transportation characteristics which promote multimodal transportation options include:

1. Bus service through the Plan area;

2. Existing and planned bicycle lanes and multi-use trails on Main Street, Abel Street, Calaveras Boulevard, and Great Mall Parkway; and

3. Pedestrian-scale on Main Street that can serve all modes of travel in a balanced way.

Key transportation opportunities include:

1. Extension/connection of Abbott Avenue to Thompson Court;

2. Additional connections between Main Street and Abel Street;

3. High-quality pedestrian and bicycle connections between Main Street and Calaveras Boulevard;

4. Strategies to implement the Pedestrian/Bicycle and Trails Master Plan; and

5. Wayfinding measures and micro-mobility services.
840
Item # 20.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Receive Presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602 and Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301)
Category: Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Receive a presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study BACKGROUND:

Communities in and around Milpitas have experienced air quality and odor issues for many years from various nearby waste handling facilities. These facilities include the Newby Island Resource Recovery Park landfill and associated composting facility, operated by Republic Services (NIRRP); the San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility, operated by the City of San Jose (RWF); and a dry anaerobic food waste digestion facility, operated by ZeroWaste Energy Development Company (ZWED). There have been improvements to air quality in Milpitas due to Bay Area Air Quality Management District actions with assistance from the community.

However, odors continue to be a concern. Odors have been difficult to attribute to a single facility or process because the different facilities produce many of the same odor causing compounds.

The South Bay Odor Stakeholder Group (SBOSG) was formed in 2015 to provide a transparent forum to address odors that affect the Milpitas community and discuss enforcement activities, permit and regulatory requirements, and odor mitigation and control measures. Quarterly meetings are attended by community and industry stakeholders; Air District staff; staff from the offices of Congressman Ro Khanna, Senator Bob Wieckowski and Assemblymember Alex Lee; and staff representing the Cities of Fremont, Milpitas and San Jose . The SBOSG has identified the need for an independent odor study to better understand the contribution of different odor sources on the Milpitas community.

In 2019, the Air District committed to conduct an Odor Attribution Study to identify compounds from odorproducing facilities that are impacting Milpitas and nearby communities. The Air District released a Request for Proposal (RFP 2019-004 Odor Study) to identify contractors with the expertise to measure sources of odors from the landfill, transfer station, sewage treatment plant, compost and organic waste processing operations in Milpitas. In November 2019, the Board of Directors authorized the Executive Officer/APCO to execute a contract for up to $500,000 for Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc (Jacobs). The Air District also executed a contract in 2019 for $92,000 with Montrose Environmental Group. In October 2020, The Board also authorized an amendment to the Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. contract for up to $506,000.

ANALYSIS:

The goal of the Odor Attribution Study is to determine the contribution and variability of odors from these facilities, specific processes, and to measure how often and at what concentration these odors may be passing into the local community to inform future actions to reduce odors. The two awarded projects were designed to be complementary, and summaries of the projects are described in Table 1.

Table 1: Odor Attribution Study Awarded Projects
Montrose Environmental Group Deploy advanced real time and integrated air measurement and sampling technologies on a mobile laboratory platform, during a targeted sampling event, to identify odor causing compounds and facility chemical markers in the part per billion and part per trillion range, providing data and information to focus the efforts of other study components. 841 Item # 21.

Jacobs Engineering Group Characterize diurnal and seasonal odors by conducting focused field sampling and data collection at representative times over a minimum of three seasons; develop odor fingerprints; perform data analysis for compound identification; conduct odor dispersion modeling; perform electronic nose evaluations; develop ongoing fence-line measurement methods; prepare progress and final reports and participate in public meetings.

Staff from BAAQMD will provide a presentation on the results of the odor study projects and next steps.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This is an informational item for Council review and comment.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

The City Council’s action in providing direction is not an action subject to the California Environmental Quality as it is more akin to information collection which is exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15306.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive a presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study.
842
Item # 21.

May 17, 2022
City Council Meeting
Presentations
Item # 17: City Ventures Residential Project –56 Townhomes and 24 ADUs 1752-1810 Houret Ct.

Item #18: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update and Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration
Item #19: Adopt a Resolution Certifying Election Results and adding the Property located at 308 Sango Ct into the Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 Item #20: Milpitas Gateway –Main Street Specific Plan
Item #21: Receive Presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study
Milpitas City Council Meeting
Item No. 17: City Ventures Residential
Project – 56 Townhomes and 24 ADUs
1752-1810 Houret Ct.

May 17, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Application
A request for a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental Assessment to develop 56 townhome condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units on a 1.92-acre site at 1752-1810 Houret Court. 3 Project Location
4 Zoning Map
5 Site Development Permit
6 Conditional Use Permit / Tentative Map
7 Density Bonus / Affordable Housing
8 Density Bonus / Waiver(s)
Type of
Modification
Standard Applicant
Request
Justification Discretion
Waiver(s) Front and
rear yard
setback
A request to
reduce the front
yard setback
from 35 feet to
24 feet and the
rear yard
setback from 15
feet to 10 feet.

Due to the 0.33-acre
reduction in the overall site
area to accommodate
future widening of
Montague Expressway, the
applicant requests a
reduction in the required
front setback to meet the
minimum density
requirement in the R-3
zone.

This waiver is
allowed under
State Density
Bonus Law and
must be granted
by the City.

Parking
Waiver
Vehicle
Parking
Reduction
To provide 84
vehicle parking
spaces when
107 vehicle
parking spaces
are required per
MMC.

The State Density Bonus
Law provides a reduction in
the minimum parking
requirements for qualifying
projects
A waiver of
minimum parking
standards is
allowed under
State Density
Bonus Law and
must be granted
by the City
9 Density Bonus / Parking Waiver
Project Parking Requirements
56 Townhomes with 24 ADU’s
(TASP Standards)
108 vehicle spaces (90 spaces for the residential units and 18 spaces for guest parking)
56 Townhomes with 24 ADU’s
(Density Bonus Law Standards)
84 vehicle spaces (Guest Parking is not required for State Density Bonus Law projects)
Proposed Parking 84 vehicle spaces (80 spaces within a garage, four spaces near the front access driveway)
10 Density Bonus / Distance from BART
Bus
Stop
11 Architecture / Color and Materials
12 Open Space and Landscaping
13 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU’s)
14 Development Fees
• TADIF Fee (approx. $2.4 million)
• Public Art Fee (1% of construction costs)
• Affordable Housing Fee for 0.4 unit
• School Fees
15 Public Comment / Planning Commission
 Public Notice placed in Milpitas Post
 Sign placed at property
 1,175 postcards
 Neighborhood concerns included:
Construction impacts
 Inadequate parking
Traffic congestion
 Planning Commission Approved 6 – 0
(1 commissioner absent)
 No Additional Comments Received
16 Traffic Congestion
Findings
• The layout of the site and design of the proposed buildings, structures and landscaping are compatible and aesthetically harmonious with adjacent and surrounding development.
• The Project is consistent with the Milpitas Zoning Ordinance. • The Project is consistent with the Milpitas General Plan • The Project is consistent with the Transit Area Specific Plan For components of the project non-consistent with the Zoning Ordinance (such as setbacks and parking)
• The Project is consistent with State Density Bonus Law and Senate Bill 330
The Project meets the conditions of Government Code Section 66474 (regarding Subdivision)
Recommendation
• Open the public hearing to receive comments
• Move to close the public hearing
• Consider the exemptions in accordance with CEQA
• Adopt the resolution approving Site Development Permit No.

SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21- 0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035 and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004, subject to the Conditions of
Approval
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
MAY 17, 2022
1752-1810 HOURET CT

CITY COUNCIL
• Bay Area Builder
• Creates communities in urban infill & transit- oriented sites
• All - electric, solar- powered homes – panels come
standard
• Energy efficient building materials, heating & cooling, and appliances
• Pre -wiring for electric car chargers in every home
• Low impact landscaping and low flow water fixtures

CITY VENTURES
CITY VENTURES: PAST PROJECTS

FREMONT

SCOTTS VALLEY

MILPITAS

UNION CITY

GLENDORA
CITY VENTURES: PAST PROJECTS

SAN FRANCISCO

YORBA LINDA SAN JOSE

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT

MABEL MATTOS

ELEMENTARY

ELLISON PARK
AVENUE

CONTEMPO

VELOCITY AT
PACE
SOMONT
.7 mi to Great Mall
.4-.5 mi to BART + VTA

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT

HOURET COURT HOURET COURT PANORAMIC MONTAGUE EXPRESSWAY

CONCEPT ELEVATIONS

CONCEPT ELEVATIONS

CONCEPT ELEVATIONS

CONCEPTUAL COLOR PALETTE

LANDSCAPE PROGRAM

CONCEIVE

COLLABORATE

DEVELOP

CUSTOMIZE
LISTEN

FINALIZE
CITY
of

MILPITAS

COMMUNITY,

NEIGHBORS

COMMUNITY MEETINGS

CONCEIVE & DEVELOP SITE PLAN

FINALIZE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
CITY

VENTURES

CITY VENTURES

HOURET COURT
MAY 17, 2022
1752-1810 HOURET CT

CITY COUNCIL

Project Overview

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
City Ventures is pleased to provide this project overview for the Houret Court Site. The Houret Court site consists of 2.25 acres in southern Milpitas. The site is located west of the Montague Expressway, a major (and expanding) transit corridor, and the site is surrounded to the west, east, and north by new apartment buildings and townhomes. The existing property consists of two industrial buildings and a surface parking lot, in keeping with the industrial land use to the south.

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
1 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 The site is zoned as Very High Density Mixed Use (MXD3), which allows for housing at 41-60 DUA. The project proposes 80 homes, including 56 solar all-electric towhnome-style condominiums and 24 ground floor ADU’s. The site design includes a strong streetwall, new separated sidewalks, large street trees, and front doors that open to Montague Expressway, all of which have been thoughtfully designed to create a comfortable experience for the pedestrian along the frontage street.

The target market for these homes would be first-time homebuyers and young families. The homes range in size between 1,044 sf and 2,136 sf, with 280 sf ADU’s. The townhomes provide great flexibility for different family sizes, with home ranging from 2 to 3 bedrooms with 1 bedroom ADU’s. Each home will come standard with solar, and other sustainable features, such as low flow water fixtures, nest thermostats, and electric vehicle charging. Well-designed internal streets and paseos will encourage a neighborhood feel. Fifteen percent of the new housing units will be made affordable to households with moderate incomes. Additionally, the ground level accessory dwelling units will add to the stock of rental housing within the community. Providing these diverse unit types within this development will encourage inherent affordability, and provide living opportunities for households at a variety of income levels and life stages.

EXISTING USE
The project site for the Houret Court site currently has two industrial buildings that have been in operation for the last four decades. In the years since the construction of these buildings, the neighborhood has developed in a residential direction. This development was driven by smart planning.

The City approved the Midtown Area Specific Plan in 2002 and then the Transit Area Specific Plan in 2008, where this site was identified for mixeduse development. There are ample job opportunities in the area as well as the construction of transit infrastructure (namely BART and VTA light rail connections). The Houret Court project is one of the few remaining sites that has yet to be redeveloped in the neighborhood. This project is the keystone in realizing a vibrant and integrated residential neighborhood in south Milpitas.

DESIGN GUIDELINES
The project design team consulted the City’s Design Guidelines to inform the project’s development. Major concepts that were incorporated into this project include:
• A range of housing options (rental and for-sale) to accommodate a diversity of households;
• Pedestrian activation and vibrancy along Montague Expressway, Houret Court, and Houret Drive
• Garages and surface parking are oriented away from the public street and out of view, while buildings provide front doors to the streets • An emphasis on outdoor engagement through patios, balconies, and greenspace
• Four-story building heights consistent with the neighboring developments along Montague Expressway
• A commitment to environmental sustainability, through the encouragement of public transit and pedestrian access, car charging, water conservation, and solar, all-electric homes.

City Ventures is very much looking forward to collaborating with the City of Milpitas to develop a project that will bring activation and affordability to the wider neighborhood.

TITLE SHEET INFORMATION
The project is comprised of two parcels, located at 1752 and 1810 Houret Court.

The APN numbers are 086-41-010 and 086-41-011.

Each parcel contains one multi-tenant industrial building. The existing use of the project site is light industrial use. The current tenants include auto, construction, and machining uses.

The proposed physical alterations are to redevelop the two existing buildings, remove the existing surface parking lot, and then to regrade the site. The proposed development also intends to ”right-size” the cul-de-sac at Houret Drive, reducing excess asphalt and replacing it with landscape areas.

The property is:
• Not located in a high fire hazard severity zone, wetlands, or hazardous waste site • Within a special flood hazard area, but will be removed through grading and a LOMR-F • Not located within a delineated earthquake fault zone • Not located near a stream or other resource that may be subject to a streambed alteration agreement.

No point sources of air or water polution are proposed.

There are no species of special concern known to occur on the property.

The two existing industrial buildings were built circe 1980, therefore there are no known historic or cultural resources existing on the property.

DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
Approximate square footage of each proposed building.
• Building 1 is 11,424 SF; Building 2 is 13,512 SF; Building 3 is 5,220 SF; Building 4 is 14,618 SF; Building 5 is 14,618 SF; Building 6 is 14,618 SF; Building 7 is 12,528 SF; Building 8 is 5,220 SF
Approximate square feet of proposed residential and nonresidential development. •There is no nonresidential development proposed for this site.

Proposed massing and building height.
•Building massing information can be found on pages A1.2 and A1.5.

Number of proposed residential units.
• There will be 80 total dwelling units. These are comprised of 32 two-bedroom townhomes and 24 three-bedroom townhomes with ground-floor accessory dwelling units.

Number of proposed parking spaces.
• This project proposes 84 total parking spaces, consistent with state law amounts required for projects with a density bonus. Four of those spaces will be on-street parking, whereas 80 of them will be covered spaces.

Number of proposed below market rate units and their affordability levels. • This project proposes 8 below market rate dwelling units. Four of these BMR dwelling units are in three three-bedroom townhomes with ground-floor ADUs and four BMR dwelling units are in two-bedroom townhomes. This project will be using a State Density Bonus.

Number of proposed bonus units requested pursuant to Government Code 65915 (Density Bonuses).
• No bonus units are requested pursuant to Government Code 65915 but Density Bonus waivers to setbacks and Density Bonus parking requirements are being proposed.

Number of existing residential units on the project site that will be demolished and whether each existing unit is occupied or unoccupied.
• There are no existing residential units on the project site to be demolished. Development Statistics Allowed Proposed Gross Lot Area* n/a 1.92 acres
Net Lot Area n/a n/a
Number of Stories 12 stories 4 stories
Front Setback 12' min. 20' max. State Density Bonus Waiver Rear Setback 15', 20' when abutting residential State Density Bonus Waiver Side Yard Setback(s) 10', 20' when abutting residential. State Density Bonus Waiver Open Space Calculation .49 acres .21 acres**
*The City of Milpitas uses gross acreage for the density calculation. Section XI-10-2.41-1.1 of the Municipal Code defines gross acreage as: “The total area within the boundaries of a legal lot or parcel, including any area proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public rightof-way. Adjacent lands already dedicated for public right-of-way, including public roadways, easements or other areas, shall not be included as part of the gross acreage.” The three regional roadways that traverse the TASP area will not be counted as part of gross acreage, because these roadways serve the region rather than the adjoining property. **This project will pay a fee for two of the 3.5 acres required per 1,000 people, pursuant to Municipal Code Section XI-10-6.02 - Mixed Use Regulations. The remaining acreage will be provided for through the use of private open space.

LAND USE ENTITLEMENT REQUESTS
In terms of the land use entitlements being sought, this project proposes to utilize the Density Bonus program to:
• Use the parking reduction pursuant to the Density Bonus. There will be 1.5 parking spaces for the 2 and 3-bedroom townhomes in the proposed project. • Use a waiver for setbacks on the site. This will be applied to Policy 5.2 from the Transit Area Specific Plan Development Standards and Design Guidelines, which states “for projects with frontage on Montague Expressway, dedication of right-of-way for the widening of Montague Expressway is required. In addition, a minimum setback of 45 ft. is required between the future curb (of the widened expressway) and buildings, for landscaping and sidewalk”. The waiver will also apply to the setback standards in Table 5-1 of the MMSP.

Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, this project will request a vesting tentative map for townhome-condominium purposes.

PARKING STATISTICS
Parking Statistics Required Proposed
Standard Spaces* 84 84
Compact Spaces 0 0
Percent Compact 0% 0%
Covered Spaces * 80
Uncovered Spaces * 4
Guest Spaces * 4
Handicapped Car Spaces * 0
Handicapped Van Spaces * 1
Motorcycle Spaces 0 0
Car Share Spaces 0 0
EV Spaces * 57
EV Handicapped Spaces * 0
Short Term Bicycle Parking 4 6
*Pursuant Long TermtoBicycle government Code 65915 (Density Bonuses), Parking 80 this project requires 1.580spaces per 2 or 3-bedroom townhome unit, to cover both resident and guest parking. Milpitas does not require parking spaces for accessory dwelling units within a ½ mile of public bus stop or rail station.

Sustainable Features
Solar All-Electric Advanced Technology Homes
This project will include solar-powered, all electric, energy efficient homes.

ALL INCLUSIVE ADVANCEDTECHNOLOGY- NO EXTRA COST:
• Exceeds national energy efficiency standards
• High-performance energy efficient appliances & materials • High-efficiency led lighting
• Dual glaze milgard windows with energy efficient ultraviolet coating • Water wise kohler” plumbing fixtures
• Advanced framing technology saves trees & keep our planet green • Energy efficient smart nest” thermostat
• Energy efficient radiant barrierroofsheathing
• All hvac systems are tested for optimalrefrigerant charge & duct performance • QII Testing verifying consistent installation to ensure maximum installation • Duct leak testing verified by a 3rd party to optimize efficiency • Low to zero voc materials, paints, stains & adhesives

A SOLAR-POWERED LIFE INCLUDES ALL GREEN LIVING BENEFITS, PLUS • Advanced technology powers your entire home
• Eliminates your gas bill and reduces your electric bill • Pre-wired ready for electric vehicle chargers in garage • Energy efficient while living in comfort & style

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
2 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 Project Examples

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
3 0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

M O N T A G U E E X P R E S S W A Y
Project Information

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
SP.1
0 20 40 80
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 Conceptual Site Plan

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
SP.2
0 20 40 80
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 Site DistanceAnalysis

0. 5 MI
L
E

0. 25

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
SP.3
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary.

BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Rendering

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
PR.1
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

HOURETCOURT SITE
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 PR.2
0 2 4 8
BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Rendering
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. 26 50 SH 36 30 SH 20 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH 20 6826 50 SH 36 30 SH 20 68
SH 60 50
20 68
SH 60 50
20 68
MASTER BEDROOM M.C. 11'-7" X 11'-11"
MASTER
BATH
W/D
L
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
25'-8"
7'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
6'-6 CLEAR
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
7'-0" CLEAR
16'-0"
25'-8"
80'-8"
7'-0" CLEAR
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
60 50 SL
28 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
60 50 SL
28 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
60 50 SL
28 68
68 20 68 20
BDRM 2 11'-11" X 10'-2"
BATH
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
5'-0"
25'-8"
20'-8"

DNDNDNDN
80'-8"
16'-0"DN
DECK 15'-5" X 5'-0"

AC UNIT
W/H
30 68SC
W/H
30 68SC
W/H
30 68SC
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
10'-2"
21'-9"
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
6'-6" CLEAR
9'-0" CLEAR
16'-0"
25'-8"
22'-8" 3'-0"
80'-8"
UP

CEILING MOUNTED BIKE STORAGE
24 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
24 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
24 68
26 50 SH 36 30 SH
SH 26 50 SH 50 50 SH 26 50 SH 50 50
PDR
C
KITCHEN / DINING 11'-9" X 7'-4"
LIVING
15'-5" X 9'-7"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
25'-8"
UP
UP
UP
DN
8'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR
DNDNDN
UP
16'-0"
80'-8"
7'-0" CLEAR 7'-0" CLEAR UP DN

THIRD FLOOR FIRST FLOOR

FOURTHPLAN SECONDFLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
2 BEDROOM

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

CODE ANALYSIS
BUILDING TYPE: FIVEPLEX
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING100

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

GARBAGE &

FOOD SCRAPS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

FIBER &

PLASTICS/

METALS/GLASS
96 GA

TYPICAL CART DETAILS
HOURETCOURT SITE 0 2 4 8
A1.1
BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Floor Plans
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

BUILDING MATERIAL
Roof:

Exterior:

Exterior Accents:

Parapet
Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding
Awning
Deck Accents: Board Form Railings
Window&DoorTrim: Fiber CementTrim
Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Right Rear
Left Front 9'-1'' 9'-1'' 9'-1''
+47'-6''
9'-1''
T.O.P.

Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Elevations

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
A1.2
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

HIGHEST PARAPET
F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F. F.G.
16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
4046 SL
HYBRID
W/H
16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
3080 SC
3068
ADU 12'-10" X 16'-4"
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
UP
BATH
C
PDR
2 6'-101
" 2
19'-111
" 11'-2" 6'-10"
44'-10"
ADU 12'-10" X 16'-4"

RECYCLE
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
TRASH
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
BATH
C
UP
ENTRY

ENTRY ENTRY
ENTRY

CEILING MOUNTED

BIKE STORAGE

CEILING MOUNTED

BIKE STORAGE
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
DN
U
P17R
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
DN
U
P17R
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
DN
U
P17R
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
DN
U
P17R
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
DN
U
P17R
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
37'-1"
LIVING 13'-0" X 15'-6"

KITCHEN
PDR
DECK 13'-0" X 12'-3"
DINING
14'-3" X 8'-0" C
4'-8" 4'-7"
46'-4"
W/D
P
DN
UP
LIVING 13'-0" X 15'-6"

KITCHEN
PDR
DECK 13'-0" X 12'-3"
DINING 14'-3" X 8'-0" C
W/D
P
DN
UP

FIRST FLOOR UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE PERIMETEROF PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIORWALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL. THEEXTERIORWALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL.

ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERNALWALL.

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING 200

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - END UNITS (ADA)
2,197 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR PERIMETEROF THEEXTERNALWALL.

SECOND FLOOR
Note:Planning & Building
to approve the electrical
receptacles needed
for appliances in ADU
kitchenettes

FIBER &

PLASTICS/

METALS/GLASS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

GARBAGE &

FOOD SCRAPS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

TYPICAL CART DETAILS
BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
41'-9"
37'-1"
UP
BATH
7'-5" 13'-7" 13'-7" 7'-5"
C
MASTER BEDROOM 13'-0" X 13'-6"
7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7"
2468
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 2468
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 2468
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 2468
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 2468
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 4'-8"
DN
BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 10'-0" X 10'-0" 2
10'-0" X 11'-7"
MASTER
BATH L
3050 SH
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH 3050 SH DN17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH 3050 SH DN17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH 3050 SH DN17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH 3050 SH DN17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH
21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 7'-5" 13'-7" 13'-7" 7'-5" DN
DECK
13'-0" X 13'-9"
PDR
BONUS
20'-5" X 27'-0"
41'-9"
37'-1" 4'-8"

AC UNIT

THIRD FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR
BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING MATERIAL
Roof:

Exterior:

Exterior Accents:

Parapet
Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding
Awning
Deck Accents: Board Form Railings, MetalRailings
Window&DoorTrim: Fiber CementTrim
Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door
Right Rear
Left Front
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations 9'-1'' 9'-1'' 9'-1''
+46'-6''
9'-1''

HIGHEST PARAPET
T.O.P.

Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Elevations

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F.

T.O.P.

F.F. F.G.

H
W/
30 68 SC
4046 SL
3046 SL
2868SC
3080 SC 16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.

HW/
30 68 SC
HW/
30 68 SC
4046 SL
3046 SL
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
89'-2"
5'-5" 20'-3" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
21'-9"
10'-2"
24 68
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
24 68 24 68
50 50SH
26 50SH
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
89'-2"
25'-8" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"

FIRST FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL.

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
BUILDING300

SECONDFLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

Note:Planning & Building
to approve the electrical
receptacles needed
for appliances in ADU
kitchenettes FIBER &

PLASTICS/

METALS/GLASS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

GARBAGE &

FOOD SCRAPS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

TYPICAL CART DETAILS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES. ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERNALWALL.

BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 UP
BATH
C
MASTER BEDROOM 13'-0" X 13'-6"
DN
BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 10'-0" X 10'-0" 2
10'-0" X 11'-7"
MASTER
BATH L
3050 SH
2468
5050 SL
3050 SH
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 60 50SH
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
89'-2"
25'-8" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"

MASTER BEDROOM
11'-7" X 11'-11"
M.C.

MASTER
BATH
W/D L
7'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
60 50 SL 60 50 SL 60 50 SL
3050 SH
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050SH 3050SH
DN
DECK 13'-0" X 13'-9"
PDR
BONUS
20'-5" X 27'-0"
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
89'-2"
25'-8" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0"
DEN
11'-11" X 10'-2"
BATH
DECK
15'-5" X 5'-0"
DN

THIRD FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL.

ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERNALWALL.

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING 300

FOURTH FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

HOURETCOURT SITE 0 2 4 8
A1.7
BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

HOURETCOURT SITE
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 A1.8
0 2 4 8
BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Right Rear
Left Front
W/
H
SC 68 30
2868SC
3080 SC 16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
2868SC
3080 SC 16'-0" x7'-0" SECT. GAR.DOOR
EVSE
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
2'-6" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR.
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
4046 SL
3046 SL
ADU 12'-10" X 16'-4"
BATH
C
UP
ENTRY
ENTRY
10'-2"
21'-9"
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
6'-6" CLEAR
9'-0" CLEAR
ENTRY
121'-0"
16'-0" 16'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 20'-3" 2'-5"
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
2468
SH 26 50 SH 50 50
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
U
P17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
50 46 SL
50 50 SL
26 80T.G.

FR.DOOR
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
24 68
30 50 FX
SH 26 50 SH 50 50
50 50 SH 26 50SH
50 50 SH 26 50SH
50 50 SH 26 50SH
LIVING 13'-0" X 15'-6"

KITCHEN
PDR
DECK 13'-0" X 12'-3"
DINING 14'-3" X 8'-0" C
W/D
P
DNDN
17R
UP
C
KITCHEN / DINING 11'-9" X 7'-4"
LIVING
15'-5" X 9'-7"
UP
7'-0" CLEAR
DN
TRASH
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
7'-8" CLEAR 9'-0" CLEAR
PDR
8'-0" CLEAR
121'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 25'-8"
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"

FIRST FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL.

ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERNALWALL.

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING400

SECONDFLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

Note:Planning & Building
to approve the electrical
receptacles needed
for appliances in ADU
kitchenettes

FIBER &

PLASTICS/

GARBAGE &

FOOD SCRAPS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

METALS/GLASS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

TYPICAL CART DETAILS
HOURETCOURT SITE 0 2 4 8
A1.9
BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Floor Plans
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 3050 SH
2468
5050 SL
3050 SH
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
246824
68 3050 SH
2468
5050 SL
3050 SH
4068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
U
P17R
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
2880 26
68 2668
2468
246824
68 SH60 50
SH60 50
SH60 50
SH 60 50 SH 60 50
UP
BATH
C
MASTER BEDROOM 13'-0" X 13'-6"
DN
D
1 N
7R
BEDROOM 2
10'-0" X 10'-0" BEDROOM 2
10'-0" X 11'-7"
2468 MASTER
BATH L
MASTER BEDROOM 11'-7" X 11'-11" M.C.

MASTER
BATH
W/D
L 7'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
121'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 25'-8"
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
60 50 SL
3050 SH 3050 SH
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH
DN
17R
+/-7'-2"
HEADCLR.
6050 SL
26 80T.G.FR.DOOR
3050 SH
2468
3050 SH
DN
DECK 13'-0" X 13'-9"
PDR
BONUS
20'-5" X 27'-0"
DEN
11'-11" X 10'-2"
BATH
DECK
15'-5" X 5'-0" DN
121'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 21'-0" 25'-8"
64'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"

THIRD FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING
280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK
3 BEDROOM + BONUS
2 BATH + 2 PDR
2-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTHLEVEL.

ADU SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATED MEASUREDFROMEXTERIOR
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERNALWALL.

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING 400

FOURTH FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

HOURETCOURT SITE A1.10
0 2 4 8
BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Floor Plans
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22

HOURETCOURT SITE
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 A1.11
0 2 4 8
BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Right Rear
Left Front
W/H
30 68 SC
W/H
30 68 SC
W/H
30 68 SC
W/H
30 68 SC
W/H
30 68 SC
W/H
30 68 SC
10'-2"
21'-9"
UP
7'-8" CLEAR
6'-6" CLEAR
9'-0" CLEAR
ENTRY
45'-6"
2'-5" 40'-8" 2'-5"
96'-10"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
SH 26 50 SH 50 50 SH 26 50 SH 50 50 SH 26 50 SH 50 50 SH 26 50 SH 50 50 24 68
68 24 68 24 68 24 68 24
50 50 SH 26 50 SH
SH 26 50 SH 50 50
68 24
C
KITCHEN / DINING 11'-9" X 7'-4"
LIVING
15'-5" X 9'-7"
PDR
8'-0" CLEAR
UP
7'-0" CLEAR
DN
TRASH
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
51'
9'-0" CLEAR 7'-8" CLEAR
-6"
96'-10"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"

FIRST FLOOR

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

BUILDING500

SECONDFLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

GARBAGE &

FOOD SCRAPS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

FIBER &

PLASTICS/

METALS/GLASS
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"

TYPICAL CART DETAILS
HOURETCOURT SITE 0 2 4 8
A1.12
BUILDING 500 | Conceptual Floor Plans
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 SH 60 50 SH 60 50 SH 50 60 SH 60 50
60 50 SH
SH 60 50
MASTER BEDROOM 11'-7" X 11'-11" M.C.

MASTER
BATH
W/D
L 7'-0" CLEAR
UP
DN
51'-6"
96'-10"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
60 50 SL
SL 60 50 SL 60 50 SL 60 50 SL 60 50 SL 60 50
DEN
11'-11" X 10'-2"
BATH
DECK
15'-5" X 5'-0" DN
51'-6"
96'-10"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"

THIRD FLOOR

CODE ANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VA
OCCUPANCY: R2
COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH

WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO

BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

FOURTH FLOOR

UNIT ANALYSIS
UNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE

AREA SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATION MEASUREDFROMINSIDE
PERIMETEROFTHEEXTERIOR WALL. EXCLUDEDSTAIRATFOURTH
LEVEL.

BUILDING 500 | Conceptual Floor Plans
HOURETCOURT SITE A1.13
BUILDING 500
0 2 4 8
MILPITAS, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 BUILDING 500 | Conceptual Elevations

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
A1.14
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Right Rear
Left Front

SO LAR PANEL LOCATIONS

SOL AR PANEL LO CATIONS
BUILDING 100
BUILDING 200

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
A1.15
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 BUILDING 100 & 200 | Conceptual Roof Plans
BUILDING 500
BUILDING 300 BUILDING 400

HOURETCOURT SITE

MILPITAS, CA
A1.16
0 2 4 8
CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 03-16-22 BUILDING 300, 400, & 500 | Conceptual Roof Plans
MILPITAS, CA PLANNING SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAMHEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS,INC. DBAWHA. | 2021228 | 10-29-21 Color & Materials

HOURETCOURT SITE
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary.

CM.1
Exterior Color/Material Specifications
HYBRID BUILDING(same as Gear Residential)

ITEM MANUFACTURER COLOR & NAME
Body 1 Sherwin Williams 7566, Westhighland White
Body 2 Sherwin Williams 9163, Tin Lizzie
Body 3 Sherwin Williams 7615, Sea Surpent
Entry Door 1 Sherwin Williams 6697, Nugget
Entry Door 2 Sherwin Williams 6487, Cloudburst
Metal Awnings & Railings Sherwin Williams 6992, Inkwell Gutters & Downspouts Sherwin Williams Paint to match adjacent body color
Windows Milgard: Montecito Espresso
Garage Door Clopay White
Stone Creative Mines:

Craft Inner Piece
Imagine
Stone Mortar Orco VPJG, Grey
Conceptual Exterior Color/Material Specifications
Note: Specifications shown are conceptual. Manufacturer will be as proposed or equal.

03.16.22 L-1

MILPIT AS, CA

HOURET COURT SITE-
Collaborative
0 5’ 10’ 20’
DESIGN Scale: 1”= 10’-0” IMA GER Y
1 2
3 10 11 7
12 4
4 4
6 4
9 8 13
5 M O N TA G U E E X P R E S S W A Y

LEGEN D
1 Micro Dog Park with Benches
2 Seating are with Turf
3 Shadeed seating with Barbecue
4 Patio
5 Decorative paving in alley
6 Turf block in EVA
7 EV and ADA Parking
8 Concrete walk
9 Right-of-way
10 Turf area
11 Short term bike parking [6 spaces]
12 Mailboxes
13 Future Bus Stop

MILPIT AS , CA

03.16.22 L-2

HOURET COUR T SITE -
Collaborative
0 5’ 10’ 20’
CONCEPTU AL Scale: 1”= 10’-0” ILLUSTRA TIVE PLAN

03.16.22 L-3

MILPIT AS, CA

HOURET COURT SITE-
Collaborative

PLANTINGPALETTE
TREES

SCIENTIFIC NAME
Acer spp.

Albizia julibrissin
Arbutus ‘Marina’
Arbutus menziesii
Betula pedula ‘Dalecaslica’
Betula utilis var. jacquemonlii
Callistemon citrinus
Cercis canadensis
Cercis occidentalis
Chilopsis linearis
Cinnamomum camphor
Cornus florida ‘Rubra’
Cornus nuttallii
Fraxinus spp
Fremontodendron californicum
Ginko biloba ‘Autumn Gold’
Gledilsia triacanthos ‘Moraine’
Gleditsia tricanthos ‘Rubylace’
Koelreuteria bipinnata
Koelreuteria panicaulata
Lagerstroemia indica
Lagerstroemia lndica ‘Tuscarora Red’
Laurus nobi/is
Liriodendron tulipifera
Magnolia spp.

Olea ssp.

Pinus spp.

Pistachia chinensis
Platanus racemosa
Populus nigra ‘Italica’
Prunus sp.

Punica granatum
Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’
Pyrus kawakamii
Quercus spp.

Tristania conferta
Ulmus spp.

Zelkova serrata

COMMON NAME
Maple
Silk Tree/Mimosa
Marina Strawberry Tree
Madrone
Cutleaf Weeping Birch
Himalayan Birch
Lemon Bottle Brush
Eastern Rosebud
Western Redbud
Desert Willow
Camphor Tree
Pink Flowering Dogwood
Pacific Dogwood
Ash
Flannel Bush
Autumn Gold Maindenhair Tree
Moraine Honeylocust
Red Honey Locust
Chinese Flame Tree
Golden Rain Tree
Crape Myrtle
Tuscarora Crape Myrlie
Bay Laurel
Tulip Tree
Magnolia spp.

Olive
Pine
Chinese Pistache
Sycamore
Lombardi Cottonwood
Cherry
Pomegranate
Callery Pear
Evergreen Pear
Oak
Brisbane Box
Elm
Japanese Zelkova

CONCEPTU AL PLANT PALETTE

SHR UBS, GRASSES,

SCIENTIFIC NAME
Abelia grandifl ora sp.

Achillia millifolium
Agrotis pallens
Arctostaphylos spp.

Buxus microphylla
Buxus japonica ‘Green Beauty’
Carex glauca
Carex tumulicola
Cistus salviifolius ‘Prostratus’
Cistus ‘Sunset’
Cornus sericea
Cornus sericea ssp. Occidentails
Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfosf
Dianella sp.

Dietes bicolor
Euonymus ssp.

Festuca mairei
Helidotrichon sempervirens ‘Sapphire’
Hemerocallis sp.

Hesperaloe parviflora
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Iris douglasiana
Juncus patens
Lantana montevidensis
Lavandula ssp.

Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’
Leymus glaucus
Ligustrum japonicum ‘T exanum’
Lomandra sp.

Lonicera ssp.

Muhlenbergia ssp.

Myoporum p. ‘Putah Creek’
Nasella pulchura
Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’

AND GROUNDCO VER

COMMON NAME
Sherwood Abelia
Yarrow
Diego Bent Grass
Manzanita
Boxwood
Green Beauty Japanese Boxwood
Blue Sedge
Foothill Sedge
Sageleaf Rockrose
Magenta Rockrose
Creek Dogwood
Western Dogwood
Bearberry Cotoneaster
Flax Lily
Fortnight Lily
Euonymus
Atlas Fescue
Saphire Blue Oat Grass
Daylily
Red Yucca
Toyon
Douglas’ Iris
California Gray Rush
Trailing Lantana
Lavender
Canyon Prince Wild Rye
Creeping Wildrye
Waxleaf Privet
Dwarf Mat Rush
Honeysuckle
Deer Grass
Creeping Myoporum
Purple Needle Grass
Little Ollie Dwarf Olive

VINE AND ESP ALIER

SCIENTIFIC NAME
Ficus pumila
Jasminum po/yanthum
Trachelospermum jasminoides

COMMON NAME
Creeping fig
Pink Jasmine
Star Jasmine

SHR UBS, GRASSES,

SCIENTIFIC NAME
Phormium sp.

Pittosporum sp.

Podocarpus elongatus ‘lcee Blue’
Prunus caroliniana ‘Brightn Tighf
Rhaphiolepis sp.

Rosa spp.

Rosmarinus offi cinalis
Salvia spp.

Trachelospermum jasminoides
Westringia sp.

AND GROUNDCO VER

COMMON NAME
New Zealand Flax
Pittosporum
lcee Blue Yellow-wood
BrightN Tight Carolina Laurel
Indian Hawthorn
Rose
Rosemary
Sage
Star Jasmine
Coast Rosemary
Turf Grass

M O N TA G U E E X P R E S S W A Y
LEGEND
Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [21” DBH]
Celtis occidentalis (Common Hackberry) [57”
DBH]
Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) [73”
DBH] Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [28”
DBH]
Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [21” DBH]
Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [28” DBH]
15 16
17 18
13 14
1 Celtis occidentalis (Common Hackberry) [44” DBH]
2 Celtis occidentalis (Common Hackberry) [72” DBH]
3 Cinnamomum camphora (CamphorTree) [62” DBH]
4 Cinnamomum camphora (CamphorTree) [39.5” DBH]
1 5 Cinnamomum camphora (CamphorTree)[65” DBH] 1
9 Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Tree)[48” DBH]
6 Cinnamomum camphora (CamphorTree) [56.5” DBH]
7 Celtis occidentalis (Common Hackberry) [74” DBH]
8 Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Tree)[54” DBH]
9 Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Tree)[45” DBH]
10 Populous fremomtii (Western Cottonwood) [74” DBH]
11 Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [42” DBH]
12 Liquidamber styraciflua (Sweet Gum) [28” DBH] 12
14 13
2 11 10
9 8
7 6 5 4 3
19 18
15 16
17 03.16.22 L-4

MILPIT AS , CA

HOURET COUR T SITE -
Collaborative
0 5’ 10’ 20’
EXISTING TREE PLAN Scale: 1”= 10’-0”
C O N C E P T U A L P O L E L I G H T [ O R E Q U A L ] SCALE: NTS
C O N C E P T U A L B O L L A R D L I G H T [ O R E Q U A L ] SCALE: NTS
Housing/fitter: Die-cast aluminum construction with a spun aluminum cap. The fixture slip fits a 3" O.D. pole top or tenon and is secured by four (4) socket head stainless steel set screws threaded into stainless steel inserts. Die castings are marine grade, copper free (≤ 0.3% copper content) A360.0 aluminum alloy.

Enclosure: Molded 1/8" clear high impact acrylic lens with white, aluminum louver stack.

Electrical: 23.4 W LED luminaire, 27 total system watts, -30° C start temperature. Integral 120V through 277V electronic LED driver, 0-10V dimming. Standard LED color temperature is 4000K with a >80 CRI.

Available in 3000K (>80 CRI); add suffix K3 to order.

Note: Due to the dynamic nature of LED technology, LED luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA-US. For the most current technical data, please refer to www.bega-us.com.

Finish: All BEGA standard finishes are polyester powder coat with minimum 3 mil thickness. Available in four standard BEGA colors: Black (BLK); White (WHT); Bronze (BRZ); Silver (SLV). To specify, add appropriate suffix to catalog number. Custom colors supplied on special order.

UL listed for US and Canadian Standards, suitable for wet locations.

Protection class: IP65.

Weight: 22.0 lbs.

EPA (Effective projection area): 1.3 sq. ft.

Luminaire Lumens: 1697
Type:

BEGA Product:

Project:

Voltage:

Color:

Options:

Modified:

A
B
Lamp A B
77 142 23.4 W LED 255⁄8 235⁄8
*recommended for use with 8' to 12' poles
BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 FAX (805) 566-9474 www.bega-us . com ©copyright BEGA 2019 Updated 01/18/2019
APTOS ™ BOLLARD

PRODUCT DATA PRODUCT DATA
APTOS ™ BOLLARD
T800.451.0410 | www.forms-surfaces.com
© 2020 Forms+Surfaces® | All dimensions are nominal. Specifications and pricing subject to change without notice. For the most current version of this document, please refer to our website at www.formssurfaces.com.

LIGHTENGINE DESCRIPTION - HARDWIREDBOLLARD
LAMPS DESCRIPTION LUMINAIRE LUMENS* B.U.G. RATINGS
3000K LED 40Wcustom LEDlightengine 205 B0-U1-G0
4000K LED 40Wcustom LEDlightengine 220 B0-U1-G0

LIGHTENGINE DESCRIPTION - SOLARBOLLARD
LAMPS DESCRIPTION LUMINAIRE LUMENS* B.U.G. RATINGS
3000K LED Custom LEDlight engine 49 B0-U1-G0
4000K LED Custom LEDlight engine 53 B0-U1-G0
*Luminaire lumens represents the absolute photometry for the luminaire, andindicates the lumens out of the entire fixture.

NOTE:Polar candela and isofootcandle plots can be foundon theAptos Bollard product page on our website.

CERTIFICATION
• Hardwired Aptos Bollard is ETLandC-ETLlisted for wet locations.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Please refer to the AptosBollard EnvironmentalDataSheets for detailed environmentalimpact information. • Metal componentshavealonglife cycle andare100%recyclable. • Standardpowdercoatfinishesare no-VOC; non-standard powdercoatfinishes are no- or low-VOC,dependingon color. • Lowmaintenance.

NOMINAL DIMENSIONS- HARDWIREDBOLLARD BASE PLATEMOUNTING DETAIL

5.1" base

36.5"

4.9"

6.4"

3.5" bolt mounting
circle

1.8" conduit opening

03.16.22 L-5

MILPIT AS , CA

HOURET COUR T SITE -
Collaborative
0 5’ 10’ 20’
CONCEPTU AL LIGHTING DET AILS Scale: 1”= 10’-0”

WT WT WT WT
SVC

JT JT JT
SD

EX SD

PRELIMINARY

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SECTION W1
1 1

Milpitas City Council Meeting
Item #18: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the
Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan
Update and Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian,
and Bicycle Master Plan Initial Study
Mitigated Negative Declaration
May 17, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Background
• Progress Since Draft Plan Completion
• Public Engagement Process
• Existing Network and Conditions
Network Needs of the Community
Master Plan Goals and Recommendations
Implementation Priorities and Strategies
CEQA
Recommendation
Agenda
3 Background
4 Progress Since Draft Plan Completion
Draft Plan Presentation to City
Council
• February 2, 2021
City Commission Presentations
• February and March 2021
Public Review
• February – April 2021
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Documentation Preparation
• May 2021 – February 2022
Public Comment to CEQA
documentation
• March - April 2022
Final Plan Preparation
• May 2021 – April 2022
5 Online Input
• Existing Condition Input Map
• Recommendations Map
• Virtual Open House, Draft Plan and
Design Guidelines
2 Public Workshops
• Existing Conditions / Plan Overview
• Recommendations
2 Pop Up Events
• Hot August Bites
• Farmers Market
Public Engagement Process
6 2 Commission Events
• Park, Recreations, & Cultural Resources
Commission
Presentation to all City
Commissions
• Draft Master Plan Presentation
Additional Outreach Methods:
• Digital Communications: Facebook,
Twitter, NextDoor
• Milpitas Post
• Facebook Advertisements
• Virtual Open House
Public Engagement Process (Cont)
7 Existing Network and Conditions
• Prior Master Plans were completed before completion of Milpitas BART station and Metro Plan private developments.
• Milpitas population has grown by 16% since previous Master Plan adoption.
• 78% of individuals commute to work by driving alone.
• Limited connectivity in today’s active transportation network. • Many experience major economic and physical barriers to travel. 8 Network Needs of the Community
• Growing population, increasing demand on the transportation system
• New travel opportunities, including BART, OnDemand Shuttle, bike and scooter share
• Desire for improved safety, increased travel options, and improved connectivity to destinations
• Create bike network separated from vehicle traffic to provide comfort and confidence, Low-Stress, for average bicyclists.
• Promote activity-friendly environments, environmental and economic sustainability, and “first- and last-mile” connections to transit
9 Master Plan Goals and
Recommendations
10 The Trails, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan
provides a vision and action plan for the next 20 years to provide safe and convenient active modes for travel
Goals include:

Connections to popular destinations such as retail centers, workplaces, parks, transit hubs, and civic spaces
Multi-modal travel includes walking, biking, and transit Improved safety through improvements, such curb
extensions, green bike lanes, and enhanced crosswalks
Low-stress networks suitable for all ages and abilities, such as separated bike lanes and separated multi-use paths.
11 Spot Recommendations
• Road crossing improvements,
path access, bike lane
connectivity
• Spot Recommendations
Corridor Recommendations
• New bikeways, paths, and
sidewalks
Area Recommendations
• Pedestrian focus area
12 Low-Stress
Network
45 miles of proposed lowstress bikeways
Including 5 miles of new
shared-use paths
62 miles of low-stress
bikeways when implemented
13 Total Improvement Cost
Improvement Type Improvement Examples Planning Level Cost Pedestrian
Improvements
Signal upgrade and
sidewalk $121.2 million
Bike Improvements Separated bikeway and
Green Bike lane $108.2 million
Bike Spot Improvements Bike lane connectivity $2.5 million Trail Improvements Linear trail $13.5 million
Trail Spot Improvements Trailhead and trail access
improvements $48.6 million
Total Planning Level Cost $294.0 million
14 Implementation
Priorities and
Strategies
15 Project Priorities
16 Project Priorities
Bikeways and Trails
17 Project Priorities
Intersection and Trail Access
18 Implementation Strategies
• Maximize existing right-of-way;
Pavement Management Program
• Inclusion in CIP, coordination with
other projects and departments
• Coordination with private
development
• Project Phasing
• Quick-Build approach
• Pursue grants and partnerships
Improvement Funding
19 • SB-1, Measure B sales tax, Gas Tax, Vehicle Fee, and TDA article 3 funds may be used for Master Plan recommended improvements.

However, this would compete with other city projects such as Street Resurfacing.
• Through annual Capital Improvement Program process, create new projects for the Master Plan's highest priority needs.
• Pursue grant funding opportunities, and both private and public partnerships for project funding.
20 Other Topics
Policy and Programs: • Recommend new and expanded
programs: Safe Routes to
School, Bike Parking, Staff
Training, Data Collection and
User Counts
Micro-mobility Assessment:
• Recommendations for implementation of shared mobility (bike and scooter) options
Design Guidelines: • Guidance for active transportation infrastructure 21 CEQA
Initial Study – Mitigated
Negative Declaration (IS-MND)
22 Programmatic Approach
Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) was prepared:
• Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a negative declaration was published on March 18, 2022.
• 30-day public review and comment period began on March 18th, 2022 and ended on April 18th, 2022.

Reasonably foreseeable direct and indirect physical
environmental effects
Screened which projects are likely to result in environmental impacts
Specific project plans were not considered
Programmatic mitigation
23 Draft CEQA Comments Received
Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
• Requested they be notified during the planning process for projects affecting their right of way.

Department of Toxic Substances Control
• Requested modification to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 - Hazardous Material Sites Investigation and Remediation to include advance notice and approval requirement, which was revised for the Final IS-MND.
24 Recommendations
Open the public hearing for comments and move to close the hearing.

Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Adopt Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update
Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15075.

City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
Milpitas City Council
Item #19: Adopt a Resolution Certifying
Election Results and adding the Property
located at 308 Sango Ct into the
Community Facilities District No. 2008-1
May 17, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Background
Project located at 308 Sango Court, is an 1.1-acre site located with the Transit Specific Plan Area.

Site Development Permit, Tree Removal Permit, Environmental Assessment, and Density Bonus approved by City Council on August 5, 2021.
85 Dwelling Units (100% Affordable), includes a ground floor parking garage with up to 48 vehicle spaces, and 20,788 square feet of public and private open space.
3 Background
Project Parcel A is located
at 308 Sango Court

1.1-acre site
4 CFD 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22)
Project is subject to annexation
to the Community Facilities
District 2008-1, (Annexation No.
22)
Certificate of Registrar of Voters
certified there are no registered
voters residing within the
boundaries of the proposed
annexation
Pacific West Communities Inc. is
the sole property owner and
agrees to the CFD Annexation
5 Recommendation
Following receipt of election results from the City Clerk, adopt a resolution certifying election results and adding Parcel A to the Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22). 6 Thank you

5.17.2022 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 // 1
Milpitas Gateway – Main Street Specific Plan
May 17, 2022 | Presentation to Milpitas City Council
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Agenda

1. Introduction to Project Scope and Timeline

2. Overview of Land Use, Zoning, and Urban Form Analysis • Project Area
• Scale Comparisons
• Key Findings
• Focus Areas

3. Overview of Market and Retail Analysis
• Key Findings by Sector: Residential, Retail, Office

4. Next Steps and Discussion Questions
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 2
Introduction to Project
Scope and Timeline
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Planning Process and Timeline
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 5
Community Outreach Process
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
TAC
Formation
MilpitasMainStreet.org
Website Development
and Online Engagement
Stakeholder
Interviews
Workshop #1
Community input
on plan priorities,
needs, and vision
May / June 2022 Spring/Summer
2022
June 2022 Late June 2022
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 6
Preliminary Outreach Feedback
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Community Conversations - Themes
• 3 sessions with breakout rooms and
report-backs.
• Interest in growing local economy
with diverse local businesses.
• Desire for family-friendly activities,
community spaces, and nightlife.

Holiday Magic Pop-Up Feedback
• Direct feedback from event
participants.
• Excitement about Main Street being
a real downtown and a place to
go/be.

Overview of Land Use, Zoning,
and Urban Form Analysis

1. Midtown Specific Plan was adopted in
2002 and updated in 2010.

2. Midtown boundary will be adjusted to
focus planning efforts on the
revitalization of historic Main Street
and the Calaveras gateway.

3. Midtown Specific Plan to be renamed
Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan to
reflect this new focus.

MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Gateway-Main Street Specific
Plan Area
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 8
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Gateway-Main Street Specific
Plan Area
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 9

1. Areas to be added to the
Gateway Plan.

2. Area to be removed from the
Gateway Plan.

South of Great Mall
Pkwy to be removed
Parc Metro to
be added
Residential and
1-880 Frontage
to be added
Sobrato Center
area to be added
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Gateway-Main Street Specific
Plan Area
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 10
Existing Neighborhoods
Terra Serena
Luna
Parc Metro
South of
Calaveras
Neighborhoods
Parc West
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Gateway-Main Street Specific
Plan Area
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 11
Urban Reserve Areas
• Elmwood Correctional Facility
• Urban Pacific Freight Yard
Scale Comparisons
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 12
Other built-out main street districts have a compact, walkable, and pedestrian-friendly block form and scale.

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 13
Key Takeaways

1. East-west streets along Main and Abel
are offset and discontinuous.

2. Large/long blocks with limited
connections through District.

3. North-south block lengths range from
700-2600 feet (1/2 mile).

4. Walls and gates limit access.

Plan Considerations

1. Require large parcels (3-20 acres+) to
create smaller sub-parcels (~2-3 acres)
as development occurs.

2. Add east-west connections (vehicle,
ped, etc.) where possible.

3. Orient new development to street and
pedestrian realm.

MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Block Pattern and Size
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 14
Key Takeaways

1. FARs, height, and other standards
don’t enable development consistent
with the SP or General Plan Vision.

2. Main Street: .75 FAR is low for 3
stories/45 ft height.

3. FAR and height are inconsistent with
Specific Plan goals of residential and
mixed-use.

Plan Considerations

1. Calibrate standards to facilitate the
type of development desired.

2. Evaluate parking and open space
requirements to create a more
“pedestrian-friendly” place.

MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Existing Development Standards
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 15

1. Fragmented ownership
and small parcel size of
Main Street parcels limits
opportunities for change.

2. Larger land holdings and
publicly-owned parcels
with vacant buildings or
land can be potential
catalyst sites.

Ownership Patterns
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN Publicly-Owned Parcels Contiguous Large Parcels CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 16

1. The area is home to a mix
of religious, cultural,
educational, and public
uses that converge along
Main Street.

2. These anchors are key to
what makes Main Street a
diverse, unique center, and
will be important to the
planning process.

Social, Cultural, and
Community Anchors
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Milpitas Library (Grammar School)
Avatamsaka Buddhist Lotus Society
St. John Baptist Catholic Church
Jain Center of Northern California
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 17
Specific Plan Focus Areas
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN

1. The 3 Focus Areas:
• Calaveras Boulevard
• Main Street
• I-880/ Abbott Corridor
Main Street
Calaveras
Gateway
I-880 / Abbott
Corridor
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 18
The Crossroads
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
The “Crossroads” are an area of special
interest at Calaveras / North Main Street
/ Serra Way.

The Crossroads are an
Area of Special Interest
Serra Center Approach to Main Street along Serra Way
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 19
Opportunity Areas
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Vacant Parcel
on Thompson
Court
The Crossroads
Calaveras
Gateway
North Main and
Carlo Street
South Main and
Tom Evatt Park
Serra Center
Curtis Ave
Gateway
Opportunity areas are future catalyst
sites.

Curtis Avenue Gateway
Calaveras Gateway
Serra Way Crossroads Shopping Center, Main & Serra
Vacant Parcel on Thompson Court
Serra Center sign along Calaveras
Overview of Market and
Retail Analysis
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Market Analysis Key Findings: Residential

1. Strong market support for new residential.

2. Proximity to BART and new amenities in Metro area.

3. Smaller parcels support ownership housing.

4. Incentives needed for parcel aggregation.

5. Variety of densities possible.

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 21
Milpa Village Townhomes in Milpitas, CA The Oslo in Washington D.C Chop Row in Seattle, WA MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Future Opportunities in Specific Plan Area

1. Calaveras district is at the eastern end of the
237 corridor path of development.

2. I-880 & Abbott Avenue Corridor and western
end of Gateway District.
 Freeway frontage (I-880)
 Existing office uses
 Large sites
Market Analysis Key Findings: Office and Industrial
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 22
Bird’s Eye View of I-880 & Abbott Avenue Corridor (Looking West) View to Vacant County Parcel at Thompson Court Vacant Parcel
Thompson Court
I-880
S Abbott Ave
S Abbott Ave
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Market Analysis Key Findings: Retail

1. Strong Demographic Support for Retail.

2. Existing Retail Challenges.

3. Future Retail in Specific Plan Area.

4. Emphasis at the Crossroads as a key
opportunity.

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 23
Main Street Focus Area: Land Ownership Main Street Focus Area: Parcel Access (Vehicular) MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Macro Retail Trends
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 24
Public spaces, places, and gathering
areas are easier in a “district” than on
a “corridor”.

Top retail trends, highly influenced by
Covid-19:

1. Acceleration of retail trends that were already
in place.

2. Surprising short vs long-term changes at play…
and some non-trends.

3. Retail is increasingly key to the success of
other land use types.

4. “Home” has taken on a new meaning.

5. Malls are yesterday’s news, a trend that is
accelerating today.

6. Physical-digital relationship with the customer
is changing.

7. Adaptation of public spaces and common areas.

MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Corridors and Nodes
It is easier to activate a node than a
corridor…

1. One goal for a successful, activated
district is to get people to “linger longer.”

2. People want to be where people are.

3. Design and program not just “deliberate”
public spaces, but “accidental” ones too.

4. This welcoming environment will be selfreinforcing, and will then accrue to the success of the businesses located nearby.

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 25
The
Crossroads
Next Steps and
Discussion Questions
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Next Steps and Upcoming Priorities

1. Engagement (Spring/Summer 2022)
• TAC Formation and 1st Meeting
• Stakeholder Interviews
• Workshop #1 – Community input on plan
priorities, needs, and vision

2. Initial Visioning/Plan Concepts (Summer 2022)

3. Potential Future Study Session Topics
• Plan Priorities
• Land Use & Development Scenarios
• Transportation and Mobility
• Public Realm Design and Improvements
• Economic Development, Funding, and
Incentives
• Review of Draft Document
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 27
TAC
Meeting #1
Stakeholder
Interviews
Workshop #1
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION #1 | MAY 17, 2022 // 28
City Council Discussion Questions
MILPITAS GATEWAY – MAIN STREET SPECIFIC PLAN

1. What are your priorities for three focus
areas: Main Street, the Calaveras
Corridor, and the Abbott/I-880
frontage?

2. What are your thoughts on “The
Crossroads” at Abel Ave./Serra
Way/Main St. as a key location in the
revitalization of Main Street?

3. Do you have any specific suggestions or
insights for the upcoming community
outreach and engagement activities?

4. What do you think is the appropriate
scale and density of development for
Main Street and the Calaveras
Corridor?
The
Crossroads

Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Milpitas City Council Meeting
Item #21: Receive Presentation from Bay Area Air
Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study
May 17, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Background
March 5, 2019 – BAAQMD Presentation to City Council regarding odor in the community
September 16, 2019 – BAAQMD presentation to the Stationary Source Committee
November 20, 2019 – Odor Attribution Study approved by BAAQMD Board May 5, 2022 – Presentation of Odor Study results to the South Bay Odor Group
May 17, 2022 – Presentation of Odor Study results to City Council 3 Two Studies Underway
Community Odor Monitoring vs. Odor Attribution Study
• Both studies are expected to provide recommendations
monitoring methodology and equipment to measure odor and potential future odor reduction actions.

Milpitas’ Community Odor
Monitoring Pilot Program
Collected objective data on
odors experienced (i.e., odor
characteristics) in the
community.

Bay Area Air Quality
Management District’s
(BAAQMD) South Bay Odor
Attribution Study
Odor attribution study to link
experienced odors to main
odor sources.
4 Consultant Recommendations from
Milpitas’ Community Odor Monitoring
Pilot Program
Recommendation #1: Purchase four Instrumental Odor Monitoring Systems (IOMS) with automatic air samplers
• Install an instrumental odor monitor system (IOMS) with auto bag samplers at specific locations within the community.
• Estimated one-time cost of $176k and annual costs of $60k.

Recommendation #2: Develop a dedicated mobile app or enable mobile odor complaint reporting in an existing app
• Introduce a mobile app for the community to provide improved feedback Bay Area Air Quality Management District
South Bay Odor Attribution Study
Milpitas City Council Meeting
May 17, 2022
Ranyee Chiang, Ph.D.

Director of Meteorology and Measurement
[email protected]
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Presentation Outline
• Area overview
• History of complaints and actions
• South Bay Odor Stakeholder group
• Odor study challenges and goals
• Key findings
• Options for reducing odors
6 May 17, 2022
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Area Overview
7 May 17, 2022
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Area Overview
May 17, 2022 8
Details of this area shown on next slide
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Newby Island Resource Recovery Park
(NIRRP)
• Landfill
• Material Recovery Facility
• Composting Operation
San Jose Santa Clara Regional Wastewater
Facility (RWF)
• Sewage
• Sludge Ponds & Drying Beds
Zero Waste Energy Development (ZWED)
• `In-vessel Composting
Waste Facilities
9 May 17, 2022
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
History of Complaints and Actions
May 17, 2022 10
*as of 3/9/22
Number of Public
Nuisance Violations Issued
2015 4
2016 4
2021 1
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
South Bay Odor Stakeholder Group
May 17, 2022 11
• Formed in 2015
• Identified the need for an independent odor study
• Provided input on odor study through quarterly
meetings
Air District
Santa Clara County
Fremont
Milpitas
San Jose
Congressman Ro Khanna
Assemblymember Alex Lee
Senator Bob Wieckowski
Industry
Representatives Government
Community
Members
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Challenges In Determining Sources Of
Odors
May 17, 2022 12
• Characteristics of odors can change with
concentration and olfactory fatigue
Facilities
Sensory
Meteorology
Technology
• Proximity and similarity of three facilities make it
difficult to trace odors to specific facilities
• Processes vary over time and space
• Wind, temperature, humidity, inversion, seasonal
fluctuations
• Humans can detect smells at very low concentrations,
which are difficult to measure with current,
commonly available equipment
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Air District Odor Attribution Study
May 17, 2022 13
• Identify contributions of odors from three facilities and specific processes
• Evaluate variability and seasonality of odors, including in nearby communities
• Inform future actions to reduce odors
• Best practices
• Enforcement
• Rules
• Establish methods to measure progress on facilities' future odor reduction actions
• Educate Community
Goals
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Air District Odor Attribution Study
14 Methods
• Screening and targeted measurement through mobile
platform that can measure in parts per trillion (ppt)
levels in real time (Montrose Environmental Group)
• Focused field sampling and data collection over three seasons to quantitatively and qualitatively identify odor compounds at facilities, processes, and within nearby
communities (Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc)
May 17, 2022
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Key Findings: Identified Contributions from
Each of the 3 Facilities
May 17, 2022 15
Potent odors can be attributed to:
• NIRRP landfill gas and
landfill working face
• ZWED interior space
• RWF lagoons and turbulent
streams
• Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
Wildlife Refuge also contributes to
odors, but this can be
distinguished from facility odors
NIRRP
% Contribution From Facilities at Survey Locations
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Key Findings: Unique “fingerprints” for
facilities and processes
16 Stationary Source and Climate Impacts Committee
April 18, 2022
Examples: Odor Compounds from NIRRP Processes
Odor Activity Value
This was a consistent finding across the different quantitative and qualitative methods.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Key Findings: Measures that Facilities Can
Take to Reduce Odors
May 17, 2022 17
• Add landfill gas collection wells; More
frequently monitor wells, piping, pressure, and valves with handheld sensors; Make expedient repairs when leaks are identified
• Cover operations that involve flow, mixing, or aeration and vent to dedicated abatement equipment
• Repair leaks, install/repair air curtains at door openings, and establish negative pressure zones in key areas
• Monitor carbon filters more closely and improve system for quick changeovers
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Key Findings: Monitoring Methods
May 17, 2022 18
• Proposed monitoring system by contractor:
• Includes multi-sensor devices, weather station, data processing, and auto bag samplers at three facilities and at strategic locations within community
• ~$500K - $800K to install plus ongoing costs for operation, maintenance, and analysis
• What can be achieved with additional monitoring:
• Additional data on facility and process contributions to odors and air quality
• Evaluate trends based on facility improvements
• Provide data to help identify thresholds that can be used in future regulations
• Correlate measurements with community complaints
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Next Steps
(Slide 1 of 2)
• Contractors incorporating feedback from Air District and other stakeholders • Share detailed results and report with South Bay Odor Stakeholder Group • Consult with operators (NIRRP, ZWED, RWF) on immediate steps they are able/willing to take to mitigate odors
• Consult with Local Enforcement Agency, California Air Resources Board, and other entities with independent enforcement authority or contractual/direct oversight authority over these sources on a coordinated approach to the problem
• Air District evaluating options to use enforcement and regulatory authorities
• Return with an update this summer or fall with a status update Meeting and Date 19
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Next Steps (Air District)
(Slide 2 of 2)
• Opened an enforcement investigation and are gathering evidence for next steps
• Air District Board can consider
• Enforcement to compel a higher level of control and monitoring • Directing resources towards enhanced enforcement, including increasing fees • Directing resources towards monitoring (e.g. oversight of monitoring by facility or oversight of contractors)
• Stricter regulations for
• Landfills for odor monitoring and control, with benefits for GHG emissions • Green waste operations, wastewater treatment, and material recycling to ensure proper operation which generally minimizes odors
• Continuous monitoring or sensor network to automatically pull samples when triggered (requires actionable threshold)
20 May 17, 2022
21 Recommendation
Receive a presentation from Bay Area Air Quality
Management District Staff on the results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study.

City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
23 Annual Odor Complaints
2018 – 2022
0 1380
661
231
640
185
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
No. of Complaints
Calendar Year
May 11, 2022
Complaints
24 Monthly Odor Complaints:
2020-2022
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
No. of Complaints
Month
Monthly Odor Complaints Over Last 3 Years
2020 - 2022
May 11, 2022