Cities Index.
CityCouncil_RegularSession_Attachments_05_17_2022

Milpitas City Council
May 17, 2022

Document
CityCouncil_RegularSession_Attachments_05_17_2022
Meeting
May 17, 2022
Body
Milpitas City Council
Pages
24
Original file
156.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on milpitasca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

455 EAST CALAVERAS BOULEVARD, MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035-5479 GENERAL INFORMATION: 408-586-3000, www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 5/17/2022
Agenda Item No. #18

ATTACHMENT RELATED TO
AGENDA ITEM #18

SUBMITTED AFTER AGENDA

PACKET DISTRIBUTION

PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE

C ITY OF M ILPITAS
From: Rob Means
To: City Clerk; Rich Tran; Carmen Montano; Karina Dominguez; Anthony Phan; Evelyn Chua Cc: Steven McHarris; Ned Thomas; Steve Erickson; Steve Chan; Fanny Yu; Elaine Marshall; Alex Andrade; Matt Kennedy; Tiffany Vuong
Subject: Re MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET for May 17, 2022, Item 18: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update
Date: Monday, May 16, 2022 5:27:17 PM
Attachments: trails-bike-master-plan-response.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links.

Re MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET for May 17, 2022, Item 18: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update Mayor and Council Members,
The World Meteorological Organization forecasts that within 2 years, there is a 20% chance that global temperatures will breach the critical 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) mark that scientists have warned us about for decades – and a 50% chance within 5 years. Given our dire situation, big and bold efforts - outside the box thinking – is critical to reducing CO2 emissions and the survival of our civilization.

While the Plan fails to mention the 3 pedestrian overcrossings (POC) recommended by LoopWorks, page 482 identifies for further study 4 completely different locations “where a new crossing is needed.” Absence of the 3 recommended POCs is especially curious because one of them is already in the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program: the Montague POC (Pedestrian Over Crossing) at Penitencia (project #2018, page 202). Two more POCs are needed to cross barriers presented by railroad tracks to the Parktown and The Pines neighborhoods. Details about all 3 POCs are in the email sent to Ms. Yu on April 12, 2021. When LoopWorks completes the $60M dual-loop PRT project serving the Metro Area, it will provide barrier crossings at all 3 locations and dramatically increase mobility at no cost to the City of Milpitas.

Although PRT ranks highly on the Plan’s various Project Priority descriptions, it was not mentioned nor ranked with other projects.

Safety is emphasized in the Plan in a graph (page 545) showing that over 50% of the fatalities in local accidents were pedestrians and cyclists. PRT has demonstrated over 80 million passenger miles without serious injury. The question of personal safety and security also applies to people using POCs. What is the the record for use of POCs?

Re MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET for May 17, 2022, Item 18: Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update Mayor and Council Members,
The World Meteorological Organization forecasts that within 2 years, there is a 20% chance that global temperatures will breach the critical 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) mark that scientists have warned us about for decades – and a 50% chance within 5 years. Given our dire situation, big and bold efforts - outside the box thinking – is critical to reducing CO2 emissions and the survival of our civilization.

While the Plan fails to mention the 3 pedestrian overcrossings (POC) recommended by LoopWorks, page 116 identifies for further study 4 completely different locations “where a new crossing is needed.” Absence of the 3 recommended POCs is especially curious because one of them is already in the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program: the Montague POC (Pedestrian Over Crossing) at Penitencia (project #2018, page 202). Two more POCs are needed to cross barriers presented by railroad tracks to the Parktown and The Pines neighborhoods. Details about all 3 POCs are in the email sent to Ms. Yu on April 12, 2021. When LoopWorks completes the $60M dual-loop PRT project serving the Metro Area, it will provide barrier crossings at all 3 locations and dramatically increase mobility at no cost to the City of Milpitas.

Although PRT ranks highly on the Plan’s various Project Priority descriptions , it was not mentioned nor ranked with other projects.

Safety is emphasized in the Plan in a graph (page 545) showing that over 50% of the fatalities in local accidents were pedestrians and cyclists. PRT has demonstrated over 80 million passenger miles without serious injury. The question of personal safety also applies to people using POCs.

What is the the safety record for use of POCs?
Level of Traffic Stress is highlighted, but not relieved for residents of The Pines neighborhood. Their pedestrians and cyclists must endure 5000’ of high-speed, high-traffic streets to get from Cedar Way to the Transit Center (whether heading north or south). PRT provides the easy access that will encourage people to use those transit options.

The Connectivity Analysis (starting on page 549) shows areas of the City where walking and biking makes sense. It fails, however, to incorporate the difference that the LoopWorks initial dual-loop PRT system would make – or how extensions to the system might impact other areas.

As a pioneer in promoting e-bikes and scooters since 1996, I was gratified to see the Plan recommend that Milpitas implement electric bike and e-scooter share systems. LoopWorks anticipates the City will locate some system hubs at our station locations.

As stated in Circulation Element GOAL CIR 5 (page 444), “Implement measures that increase transit use and other non-motorized travel modes that lead to improved utilization of the existing transportation system, ...” As noted on our website, PRT will dramatically increase transit use. PRT will also contribute substantially to all of the other 6 goals.

LoopWorks hopes that you will find these comments useful in seeing the potential of PRT to advance the goals of this Plan. We hope you will take the first step toward an easement agreement with LoopWorks by reviewing the Memorandum of Understanding submitted to you in 2019.

Sincerely,
Rob Means, LoopWorks Secretary
[email protected]
https://MilpitasPRT.com Transit for all of us!

REGULAR MEETING OF THE MILPITAS

CITY COUNCIL
May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 1

AG END A
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 455 E CALAVERAS BLVD, MILPITAS, CA 6:00 PM (CLOSED SESSION)
7:00 PM (PUBLIC BUSINESS)
For assistance in the following languages, you may call:

Đối với Việt Nam, gọi 408-586-2400
Para sa Tagalog, tumawag sa 408-586-3051
Para español, llame 408-586-3072
The City Council meeting is held in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas and via teleconference/Zoom webinar.

Councilmember Dominguez will be teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b)(3) from the lobby of the Embassy Suite Hotel locate at 901 E.

Calaveras Blvd. Milpitas CA. The teleconference location shall be accessible to the public for the open session portion of the meeting. Members of the public will have the opportunity to address the City Council directly via Zoom from this location pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3.

You may watch the Council meeting without providing public comment by accessing it via links here.

Meeting shall be livestreamed - Go to:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CityofMilpitas/
YouTube: https://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/youtube
Web Streaming: https://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/webstreaming

PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Oral public comments may be provided live during the City Council meeting in person or by registering for the zoom meeting in advance. To register you will need to provide an email address (not disclosed) and a name. To minimize technical difficulties, please make sure that you have the latest version of the Zoom Application. Below is the link to register for this meeting only:
https://ci-milpitas-ca-gov.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FFXgJAGPSrOS0ZvUQAWzSw After you register a link will be sent to you to join the City Council meeting in order to give your comments.

All registered meeting attendees who wish to speak must click on the “raise hand” icon when the Mayor calls for public comments. If participating by calling in on your phone, dial *9 to use the “raise hand” feature, and when you are called upon, hit *6 to unmute your phone. Your phone number will be displayed in the live meeting. The Mayor will call the speakers to begin.

All comments provided shall be limited to three minutes or less as determined by the Mayor. All members of the public will be limited to one comment per agenda item, and one comment for non-agenda items.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT
 Be respectful and courteous (words, tone, and body language).  Model civility.
 Avoid surprises.
 Praise publicly and criticize privately.
 Focus on the issue, not the person.
 Refrain from using electronic devices while on the Council dais.  Disclose conflicts of interest and affiliations related to agenda items.  Separate governing from campaigning.
 The Council speaks with one voice after making policy on issues.  Respect the line between policy and administration.
 Council will hold one another accountable to comply with this Code of Conduct. 1 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 2
CALL MEETING TO ORDER by Mayor and ROLL CALL by City Clerk (6:00 PM)

ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
(a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
City as Defendant - See document attached
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT (7:00 PM)
Report on action taken in Closed Session, if required per Government Code Section 54957.1, including the vote or abstention of each member present.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION (Mayor Tran)
PRESENTATIONS (7:05 PM)
 Asian Pacific American Heritage Month (Proclamation)
 Public Works Week (Proclamation)
 Memorial Day (Proclamation)
 Milpitas Robotics Team
 ADU Workshop Participants
PUBLIC FORUM (7:10 PM)
Those in the audience and via Zoom are invited to address City Council on any subject not on tonight’s agenda. In-person speakers wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the Mayor. In-person speakers will then be asked to come up to the podium and state their name for the record. Those interested in speaking via Zoom may do so by following the instructions on page one (1) of the agenda. Comments may be limited to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion. As an item not listed on the agenda, no response is required from City staff or the Council and no action can be taken. The City Council may instruct the City Manager to place the item on a future meeting agenda.

NOTE: If a member of the public wishes to share any presentation materials for Council consideration, they must be submitted to the Clerk’s Office by email to [email protected] by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. No presentations will be accepted in person in the Council Chambers.

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (7:15 PM)
Members of the City Council or City Manager may make brief announcements at this time. Members of the City Council may also suggest future agenda items at this time. For future agenda items, the City Council shall not debate the topic or engage in discussion but shall simply state a “yes” or “no” as to whether to direct the City Manager to place the item on a future meeting agenda. If a majority of the City Council agrees to place an item on a future meeting agenda, the City Manager shall place the item on a future agenda for City Council discussion.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

READING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR (7:25 PM)
Consent calendar items are considered to be routine and will be considered for adoption by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember, member of the audience or staff requests the Council to remove an item from (or be added to) the consent calendar. Any person desiring to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed from the consent calendar. 2 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 3
C1. Receive the City Council Calendar of Meetings for May and June 2022 (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001)
Recommendation: Receive the City Council Calendar of Meetings for May and June 2022.

C2. Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 and the Special Meeting Minutes of May 10, 2022 (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001) Recommendation: Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2022 and the Special Meeting Minutes of May 10, 2022.

C3. Receive the Preview List of Anticipated Items for the Next Regular City Council Meeting (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001)
Recommendation: Receive the list of anticipated agenda items for the next regular City Council meeting.

C4. Receive and Review the List of Agenda Items Requested by City Councilmembers (Contact:

Mayor and City Councilmembers, 408-586-3000)
Recommendation: Review the list of items that have been requested by City Councilmembers and provide direction to staff as necessary. No substantive discussion about any specific item shall occur and the City Council shall hold all debate about the item until it is scheduled as a full agenda item.

C5. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Adopt a Resolution Declaring Its Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and Provide Notice of the Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022, for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-1 (LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director 408-586-3301) Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of the Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022, for LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon.

C6. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Adopt a Resolution Declaring Its Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and Provide Notice of Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-1 (LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director 408-586-3301) Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.

C7. Adopt a Resolution to Approve Project Plans and Specifications, Award Construction Contract to DeSilva Gates Construction LLC for Street Resurfacing Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303; and Approve Budget Change for Project Nos. 4303 and 4298 (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer 408-586-3301)
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to approve Project Plans & Specifications; award the Construction Contract to the lowest responsible, and responsive bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303; authorize the City Manager to execute the Construction Contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC; authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to negotiate and execute Contract Change Order(s) in an aggregate amount Not to Exceed $1,188,612.75 for the project; and approve the Budget Change to appropriate funding for CP 4298 and CP 4303.
3 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 4
C8. Resolution Granting City Staff Enforcement Authority Regarding the Distribution of Single-use Foodware Accessories and Standard Condiments consistent with Assembly Bill 1276 (Staff Contact: Elaine Marshall, Deputy Public Works Director, 408-586-2603) Recommendation: Adopt a resolution granting City staff authority regarding the distribution of singleuse foodware accessories and standard condiments consistent with Assembly Bill 1276.

C9. Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Administrative Services Agreement and the Government Money Purchase Plan and a Trust Agreement and related documents with Mission Square Retirement for a 401A program for Unrepresented Executive Management and modify Resolution 8980, Unrepresented Employee Benefits (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute an Administrative Services Agreement and the Government Money Purchase Plan and a Trust Agreement and related documents with Mission Square Retirement for a 401A program for Unrepresented Executive Management and modify Resolution 8980, Unrepresented Employee Benefits.

C10. Adopt a Resolution Granting an Easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Grant of Easement, and Any and All Necessary Documents, in a Form Approved by the City Attorney, for the Access to Operate, Inspect, Maintain, Repair, and Reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and Appurtenant Structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602) Recommendation: Adopt a resolution granting an easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Grant of Easement, and any and all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the access to operate, inspect, maintain, repair, and reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station.

C11. Review the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022 (Staff Contact: Lauren Lai, Finance Director, 408-586-3111) Recommendation: Review the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022.

C12. Authorize the City Manager to Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Local 1699 Modifying the Eligible Participants for the Retiree Dependent Medical Fund (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Local 1699 modifying the eligible participants for the Retiree Dependent Medical Fund.

C13. Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Side Letter to Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and United Public Employees of California (UPEC Local 792), the Professional-Technical Unit (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086)
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to enter into a side letter agreement with the United Public Employees of California (UPEC Local 792), the Professional-Technical Unit adding a new section to the Memorandum of Understanding to compensate qualified Community Service 4 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 5
Officers when expressly assigned to work as Field Evidence Technicians (FET) a 5% pay differential above their base salary.

C14. Make Findings and Determinations Set Forth in Assembly Bill 361 and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Virtual Meetings of the City Council and Legislative Bodies (Staff Contact: Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney, 408-586-3040)
Recommendation: Move to make findings and determinations under Assembly Bill 361 and adopt a resolution authorizing virtual meetings of the City Council and legislative bodies.

C15. Authorize and Approve Out-of-State Travel to Reno, NV for Mayor Rich Tran, and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano to Attend the United States Conference of Mayors to be Held on June 3 – 6, 2022 for a Combined Total Estimated Amount of $4,700 (Staff Contact: Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053)
Recommendation: Authorize and approve out-of-state travel to Reno, NV for Mayor Rich Tran, and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano to attend the United States Conference of Mayors to be held on June 3 – 6, 2022 for a combined total estimated amount of $4,700.

C16. Receive an Update on the Emergency Replacement of Two (2) Boilers and Install of a Temporary Heating System for the Public Works, Information Technology, and Police Department Building and Determine that the Condition Continues to Constitute an Emergency (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602)
Recommendation: Receive an update on the emergency replacement of two boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Police and Information Technology Department buildings; and (2) Determine by a four-fifths vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:30 PM)
Members of the public may be allotted up to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion, to comment on any public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of ten (10) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of five (5) minutes maximum for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Council’s consent at the meeting.

17. Adopt a Resolution Approving a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental Assessment to allow the development of 56 townhome condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units. The residential development will consist of eight multi-family residential buildings up to 48 feet in height (four stories), with 84 vehicle parking spaces and associated site improvements on a 1.92- acre site located in the Very High-Density Mixed-Use (MXD3) Zoning District at 1752-1810 Houret Court. The Project is located within the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP) area and submitted under California Senate Bill 330 (Housing Crisis Act of 2019). (Ned Thomas, Planning Director, 408-586-3273)
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to approve Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21- 0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035, and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004, subject to the Conditions of Approval.

18. Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update and Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301, Steve Chan, Transportation and Traffic Manager, 408-586-3324)
5 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 6
Recommendation: (1) Open the public hearing for comments and move to close the hearing; (2) Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; (3) Adopt a Resolution to Adopt the Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan Update; and (4) Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15075.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (9:00 PM)

19. Adopt a Resolution Certifying Election Results and Adding the Property Located at 308 Sango Court into Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301) Recommendation: Following receipt of election results from the City Clerk, adopt a resolution certifying election results and adding the property located at 308 Sango Court into Community Facilities District No. 2008-1 (Annexation No. 22).

20. Receive Progress Report on The Work Completed and Existing Conditions Analysis from Ascent Environmental and Staff on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, Discuss Plan Objectives and Priorities, and Provide Direction on Key Planning Concepts and Land Use Strategies (Staff Contact: Ned Thomas, Planning Director, 408-586-3273 and Jay Lee, Principal Planner, 408-586-3077)
Recommendation: Receive progress report on the work completed and existing conditions analysis from Ascent Environmental and staff on the Milpitas Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, discuss Plan objectives and priorities, and provide direction on key planning concepts and land use strategies.

COMMUNITY SERVICES AND SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE (10:00 PM)

21. Receive Presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the Results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586- 2602 and Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301) Recommendation: Receive a presentation from Bay Area Air Quality Management District Staff on the results of the South Bay Odor Attribution Study.

ADJOURNMENT (10:30 PM)

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE
Government’s duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions and other City agencies exist to conduct the people’s business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and City operations are open to the people’s review. For more information on your rights under the Open Government Ordinance or to report a violation, contact the City Attorney’s office at Milpitas City Hall, 455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035 e-mail:[email protected] / Phone: 408-586-3040 The Open Government Ordinance is codified in the Milpitas Municipal Code as Title I Chapter 310 and is available online at the City’s website www.milpitas.gov by selecting the Milpitas Municipal Code link.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after initial distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s office at Milpitas City Hall, 3rd floor 455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas and on City website. City Council agendas and related materials can be viewed online: www.milpitas.gov/government/council/agenda_minutes.asp (select meeting date)

APPLY TO SERVE ON A CITY COMMISSION
Commission application forms are available online at www.milpitas.gov or at Milpitas City Hall. 6 May 17, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 7
Contact the City Clerk’s Office at 408-586-3001 for more information.

If you need assistance, per the Americans with Disabilities Act, for any City of Milpitas public meeting, please call the City Clerk at 408-586-3001 or send an e-mail to [email protected] prior to the meeting. You may request a larger font agenda.
7 8
Item # (a)
9 Item # (a)
10 Item # (a)
Updated 5/13/22

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR
May 2022
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 9:00 AM-Asian
Pacific American
Month Flag
Raising Event
(Cesar Chavez
Plaza)
2 7:00 PM-Parks, Recreation &
Cultural Resources Commission
(CM)
3 7:00 PM-City Council
4 2:00 PM-Santa Clara VTA
Monthly Briefing - Northeast
Group (CM)
7:00 PM-Community Advisory
Commission (EC)
5 10:30 AM-South Bay Odor Stakeholders
Group Quarterly Meeting (RT)
12:00 PM-National Day of Prayer
Gathering, City Hall
5:30 PM-Santa Clara VTA Board of
Directors (CM)
6 7
10:00 AMSenior
Center
Open
House
8 9
Tent: 10:00 AM-AB1234
Training – Virtual Session
4:30 PM-Economic
Development and Trade
Commission (KD)
10 4:00 PM-Milpitas HOPE
Suicide Prevention Task
Force
5:30 PM-Special Council
Meeting: FY2022-23 Budget
Study Session
11 7:00 PM-Planning Commission
7:00 PM-Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Board of Directors (EC)
12 3:30 PM-Cones with a Cop Event, Baskin
Robbins, 357 Jacklin Road
4:00 PM-Santa Clara VTA Policy Advisory
Committee (AP)
7:00 PM-Cities Assoc of SCC (CM)
7:00 PM-Youth Advisory Commission
(EC)
13 *4:30 PM-City Council
Finance Subcommittee
(RT/CM)
7:45 PM-Classic Movies
Under the Stars (Civic
Center Plaza)
14 15
9:00 AM-Public
Safety Day Flag
Raising Event
(Veterans Plaza)
16 7:00 PM-Science, Technology,
and Innovation Commission
(RT)
7:00 PM-Library and Education
Commission (EC)
17 6:00 PM-Closed Session
7:00 PM-City Council
18 4:00 PM-Special City Council
Transportation Subcommittee
(RT/CM)
6:00 PM-Energy and
Environmental Sustainability
Commission (EC)
19 10:00 AM-VTA Congestion Mgmt
Program Planning Committee (CM)
3:00 PM-VTA Safety, Security, Transp.

Planning & Operations Committee (CM)
4:00 PM-Treatment Plant Advisory
Committee (CM)
6:30 PM-Bay Area Water Supply Conserv
Agency (CM)
7:00 PM-Public Safety and Emergency
Preparedness Commission (KD)
20 10:30 AM-Milpitas Gun
Buyback Press
Conference (Community
Center)
21 22
9:00 AM-Gun
Buy Back
Program
(Milpitas Comm.

Center)
23 7:00 PM-Arts Commission (RT)
24 25
1:30 PM-SCC Emergency
Operational Area Council Meeting
(CM)
2:00 PM-City Council Housing
Subcommittee (AP/EC)
7:00 PM-Planning Commission
26 27
4:00 PM-City/School
Collaborative Subcom –
school hosting (RT/CM)
28 29 30
9:00 AM-Memorial Day
Ceremony (Veterans Plaza)
City Hall Closed
31 April 2022

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
June 2022

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
League of CA Cities City Leaders Summit, Sacramento CA: CM Evelyn Chua and CM Karina R. Dominguez 11 Item # C1.

Updated 5/13/22
Milpitas City Council Calendar
June 2022
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2:00 PM-Santa Clara VTA
Monthly Briefing - Northeast
Group (CM)
5:30 PM-Veterans Commission
(RT)
7:00 PM-Community Advisory
Commission (EC)
2 5:30 PM-Milpitas Chamber of
Commerce Board (EC)
5:30 PM-Santa Clara VTA Board
of Directors (CM)
3 4
Tent: United States Conference of Mayors, Reno
Nevada (RT/CM) June 3-June 5
5 6
7:00 PM-Parks, Recreation &
Cultural Resources Commission
(CM)
7 ?:00 PM-Closed Session
7:00 PM-City Council
8 7:00 PM-Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Board of Directors (EC)
7:00 PM-Planning Commission
9 4:00 PM-Treatment Plant
Advisory Committee (CM)
4:00 PM-Santa Clara VTA Policy
Advisory Committee (AP)
7:00 PM-Youth Advisory
Commission (EC)
7:00 PM-Cities Assoc of SCC
(CM)
10 3:00 PM- City Council
Transportation Subcommittee
(RT/CM)
*4:30 PM-City Council Finance
Subcommittee (RT/CM)
8:30 PM-Movie Night Out –
Ghostbusters Afterlife [Starlite
Park]
11 12 13
4:30 PM-Economic Development
and Trade Commission (KD)
14 4:00 PM-Milpitas HOPE Suicide
Prevention Task Force
5:30 PM-Special City Council
15 6:00 PM-Energy and
Environmental Sustainability
Commission (EC)
16 5:30 PM-Measure F Oversight
Committee
6:30 PM-Bay Area Water Supply
& Conservation Agency (CM)
17 9:00 AM-VTA Board of Directors
Meeting (CM)
6:30 PM-Summer Concert
Series – Good Time Collective
[Murphy Park]
18 3:00 PMMilpitas
Family
Campout
(Higuera
Adobe)
19 9:00 AMJuneteenth
Flag Raising
(Cesar
Chavez
Plaza)
20 7:00 PM-Science, Technology,
and Innovation Commission (RT)
21 ?:00 PM-Closed Session
7:00 PM-City Council
22 5:30 PM-Cities Assoc. of SCC -
Recycling and Waste Reduction
Commission (AP)
7:00 PM-Planning Commission
23 12:00 PM-SCC Library JPA
Board of Directors (EC)
5:30 PM-Commissioners’
recognition and State of the City
Address (Veterans Plaza)
24 4:00 PM-City/School
Collaborative Subcommittee
(RT/CM)
8:30 PM-Movie Night Out –
Luca [Sunnyhills Augustine Park]
25 26 27
7:00 PM-Special Arts
Commission (RT)
28 1:30 PM-Senior Advisory
Commission (EC)
29 30
*Finance Subcommittee will only meet as needed
May 2022

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
July 2022

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 12
Item # C1.

REGULAR MEETING OF THE MILPITAS

CITY COUNCIL
May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 1

MINUTES
TUESDAY, MAY 3, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 455 E CALAVERAS BLVD, MILPITAS, CA 7:00 PM (PUBLIC BUSINESS)
The City Council of the City of Milpitas convened on the regular City Council meeting day of May 3, 2022, in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, and via teleconference/Zoom webinar.

CALL MEETING TO ORDER by Mayor and ROLL CALL by City Clerk Mayor Tran called the regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Roll Call was taken by City Clerk Wood.

PRESENT: Mayor Tran, Vice Mayor Montano, Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez (arrived at approximately 7:05 PM), and Phan
ABSENT: None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Tran.

INVOCATION
Mayor Tran led the invocation and observed a moment of silence for Norman Mineta.

PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Tran proclaimed the month of May as Affordable Housing and Building Safety Month, National Mental Health Awareness Month, and Older Americans Month.

PUBLIC FORUM
Those in the audience and via Zoom are invited to address City Council on any subject not on tonight’s agenda. In-person speakers wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the Mayor. In-person speakers will then be asked to come up to the podium and state their name for the record. Those interested in speaking via Zoom may do so by following the instructions on page one (1) of the agenda. Comments may be limited to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion. As an item not listed on the agenda, no response is required from City staff or the Council and no action can be taken. The City Council may instruct the City Manager to place the item on a future meeting agenda.

The following spoke during the Public Forum:

1. Member of the Public

2. Voltaire Montemayor

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the City Council or City Manager may make brief announcements at this time. Members of the City Council may also suggest future agenda items at this time. For future agenda items, the City Council shall not debate the topic or engage in discussion but shall simply state a “yes” or “no” as to whether to direct the City Manager to place the item on a future meeting agenda. If a majority of the City Council agrees to place an item on a future meeting agenda, the City Manager shall place the item on a future agenda for City Council discussion. 13 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 2
Mayor Tran requested the Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission agendize and explore a comprehensive internet connectivity plan.

Councilmember Dominguez requested the following:

1. Explore installing a light or four-way stop sign at the Fanyon and Kennedy Street intersection during the budget or the CIP process and requested a presentation on the update for the intersection road safety plan.

2. Request for Council to draft and release a written statement supporting women’s right to choose and support the opposition to the Supreme Court draft opinion regarding Roe versus Wade.

The two requests did not receive a majority of Council support.

Councilmember Chua thanked the Filipino America Real Estate Professional Association, the Milpitas Chamber of Commerce, and City staff, for last week’s ADU workshop. She announced the Senior Resource Fair will be on Saturday, May 7, from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM.

Vice Mayor Montano attended the Westmont Senior Living One-Year anniversary event, attended the ADU workshop event, and announced that the Parks and Recreation Commission will be having a summer camping program.

Councilmember Phan commented on reproductive rights and spoke about a letter to be sent to the governor to establish California as a sanctuary for the right of women to control their own bodies.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS City Attorney Mutalipassi asked the Mayor and City Councilmembers if they had any personal conflicts of interest. By roll call, there were no conflicts of interest. City Attorney Mutalipassi asked the Mayor and City Councilmembers if they had any reportable campaign contributions. By roll call, there were no reportable campaign contributions.

READING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT
Mayor Tran read aloud the City Council Code of Conduct.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Tran asked to move item 18 after item 15 and approved the agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items are considered to be routine and will be considered for adoption by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember, member of the audience or staff requests the Council to remove an item from (or be added to) the consent calendar. Any person desiring to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed from the consent calendar.

Motion: to approve the Consent Calendar.

Motion/Second: Mayor Tran / Vice Mayor Montano
Motion carried by the following:

AYES: Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez, Phan, Vice Mayor Montano, Mayor Tran NOES: None
14 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 3
C1. Receive the City Council Calendar of Meetings for May 2022 (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001)
Received the City Council Calendar of Meetings for May 2022.

C2. Approve the Special City Council Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2022, and the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2022 (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001) Approved the Special City Council meeting minutes of April 19, 2022, and the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2022.

C3. Receive the Preview List of Anticipated Items for the Next Regular City Council Meeting (Staff Contact: Wendy Wood, City Clerk, 408-586-3001)
Received the list of anticipated agenda items for the next regular City Council meeting.

C4. Adopt a Resolution Requesting the Allocation of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Article 3 Funding for the City’s American Disability Act (ADA) Curb Ramp Transition Program, Project No. 4283 (Staff Contact: Steve Chan, Transportation and Traffic Manager, 408-586-3324) Adopted Resolution No. 9143 requesting the allocation of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Article 3 Funding for the City’s American Disability Act (ADA) Curb Ramp Transition Program, Project No. 4283.

C5. Adopt a Resolution Designating Project No. 4304 Street Resurfacing 2022-2023 to be Funded by SB-1 The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301)
Adopted Resolution No. 9144 designating Project No. 4304 Street Resurfacing 2022-2023 to be funded by SB-1 The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

C6. Authorize the City Manager to Accept $31,474.00 in Grant Funding, Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Funding Agreement Between the Bureau of Reclamation and the City of Milpitas, and Approve $27,655.00 in Matching Funds for the Installation of Pressure Loggers Throughout the City’s Water System (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director 408-586- 2602)
Authorized the City Manager to accept $31,474.00 in grant funding in the amount of $31,474.00, approved and authorized the City Manager to execute a funding agreement between the Bureau of Reclamation and the City of Milpitas, and approved $27,655.00 in matching funds for the installation of pressure loggers throughout the City’s water system.

C7. Adopt a Resolution to Supersede Resolution 9102 to Add the Commemoration of Mexican Independence Day at Cesar Chavez Plaza (Staff Contact: Renee Lorentzen, Recreation and Community Services Director, 408-586-3409)
Adopted Resolution No. 9145 to supersede Resolution 9102 to add the commemoration of Mexican Independence Day at Cesar Chavez Plaza.

C8. Accept Additional FY 2021 Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant in the Amount of $72,578.93 for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services; Approve the Addition to the Spending Plan; and Approve the Appropriation of Funds in the Total Amount of $72,578.93 to the Police Department’s FY 2021-22 Operating Budget for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services (Staff Contact: Jared Hernandez, Police Chief, 408-586-2406)
15 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 4
Accepted additional FY 2021 Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant in the amount of $72,578.93 for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services; approved the addition to the Spending Plan, and approved the appropriation of funds in the total amount of $72,578.93 to the Police Department’s FY 2021-22 Operating Budget for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services.

C9. Accept FY 2022 Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant in the Amount of $115,913.00 for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services and Approve the Appropriation of Funds in the Total Amount of $115,913.00 to the Police Department’s FY 2021-22 Operating Budget for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services (Staff Contact: Jared Hernandez, Police Chief, 408-586-2406) Accepted FY 2022 Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant in the amount of $115,913.00 for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services, and approved the appropriation of funds in the total amount of $115,913.00 to the Police Department’s FY 2021-22 Operating Budget for Front-Line Law Enforcement Services.

C10. Receive an Update on the Emergency Replacement of Two (2) Boilers and the Installation of a Temporary Heating System for the Public Works, Police, and Information Technology Department Buildings; and Determine that the Condition Continues to Constitute an Emergency (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602) Received an update on the emergency replacement of two boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Police, and Information Technology Department buildings; and determined by a unanimous vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

C11. Approve the Sole Source Purchase and Installation of Eleven (11) Ward’s No Smoke Diesel Exhaust Removal System for an Amount Not to Exceed $113,027.46; and Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Execute the Purchase, Sale, and Security Agreement with Ward Required to Complete the Purchase (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586- 2602)
Adopted Resolution No. 9146 approving the Sole Source purchase of eleven (11) Ward’s No Smoke Diesel Exhaust Removal System for an amount not to exceed $113,027.46; and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute the purchase, sale, and security agreement, to complete the purchase.

C12. Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 311 to Establish Guidelines for the Acquisition, Funding, Use and Reporting of “Controlled Equipment,” as the Term is Defined in Government Code Section 7070 and to Fulfill the Obligations Set Forth in Assembly Bill No. 481 (Staff Contact: John Torrez, Assistant Police Chief, 408-586-2408) Waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 311 to Establish Guidelines for the Acquisition, Funding, Use and Reporting of “Controlled Equipment,” as the Term is Defined in Government Code Section 7070 and to Fulfill the Obligations Set Forth in Assembly Bill No. 481.

C13. Receive the Monthly Report for Unhoused Services (Staff Contact: Sharon Goei, Building Safety and Housing Director, 408-586-3260)
Received the February 2022 report for unhoused services.

C14. Authorize and Approve Travel to Sacramento, CA for Councilmember Evelyn Chua and Councilmember Karina R. Dominguez to Attend the League of California Cities City Leaders Summit to be Held on May 11 – 13, 2022 for a Combined Total Estimated Amount of $2,500 (Staff Contact: Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053) 16 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 5
Authorized and approved travel to Sacramento, CA for Councilmember Evelyn Chua and Councilmember Karina R. Dominguez to attend the League of California Cities City Leaders Summit to be held on May 11 – 13, 2022 for a combined total estimated amount of $2,500.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Members of the public may be allotted up to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion, to comment on any public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of ten (10) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of five (5) minutes maximum for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Council’s consent at the meeting.

15. Hold a Public Hearing and Adopt a Resolution Approving the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer, 408-586-3301, Michael Silveira, CIP Manager, 408-586-3303)
Engineering Director/City Engineer Erickson introduced the item and Capital Improvement Program Manager Silveira presented the staff report.

Mayor Tran opened the public hearing.

The following spoke during the public hearing:

1. Voltaire Montemayor

2. Ana Iontcheva

3. Robert Means
Mayor Tran closed the public hearing.

Council discussed funding for the softball fields.

Deputy City Manager Rossmann, Finance Director Lai, Public Works Director Ndah, and Engineering Director/City Engineer Erickson provided additional information.

Council discussed reallocating $300,000 from the Quiet Zone study and moving it to the Street Sweeping Project, reallocating $300,000 from the Rose Garden project, and moving it to the Softball Project, and stated support for funding the Council Chamber AV System assessment and design.

After discussion, motion: to adopt Resolution No. 9147 approving the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program with amendments to reallocate $300,000 from the Quiet Zone study to the Street Sweeping project, reallocate $300,000 from the Rose Garden project to the Softball Fields project, and support funding the Council Chamber AV assessment and design.

Motion/Second: Mayor Tran / Vice Mayor Montano
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez, Phan, Vice Mayor Montano, Mayor Tran NOES: None

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

16. Receive a Presentation and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Conceptual Plans for a Proposed Mixed-Use Development Project, up to 60 Feet (5 Stories) in Height, with up to 94 Multi-family Residential Units and Approximately 2,000 sq. ft. of Ground-floor Retail on a 1.25- acre Vacant Parcel Situated Between South Main Street and Abel Street, Approximately 500 Feet South of Serra Way (APN: 083-06-008) (Staff Contact: Ned Thomas, Planning Director, 408-586- 3273; and Lillian VanHua, Senior Planner, 408-586-3073) 17 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 6
Planning Director Thomas introduced the item.

Mayor Tran stated he would be recusing himself from this item due to the proximity of the project to his residence and handed the gavel to the Vice Mayor.

Senior Planner VanHua presented the staff report.

Project Applicant Kevin Weiss provided additional information on the proposed project.

Council received presentations from staff and the applicant, discussed the proposed mixed-use development project and stated general support to increase the affordable housing to 20%.

Councilmember Chua requested the development look at other options for the proposed restaurant area.

Councilmember Dominguez requested the development provide a community space.

Vice Mayor Montano requested the art piece on the development be a historical piece that represents Old Town Main Street.

The following spoke during public comment:

1. Voltaire Montemayor
Mayor Tran returned to the dais.

17. Accept Staff Report Providing an Update on the Mil on Main Project Located at 1380-1400 South Main Street; and Direct the City Manager as to Whether or Not to Send a Letter of Support to the County of Santa Clara for the Conversion to a 100% Deed Restricted Affordable Housing Project, with On-Site Support Services (Staff Contact: Sharon Goei, Building Safety and Housing Director, 408-586-3260)
Building Safety and Housing Director Goei presented the staff report.

Project Applicate and Vice President of the Core Companies Vince Cantore gave a presentation on the proposed project.

City Attorney Mutalipassi stated that Vice Mayor Montano has recused herself based on the location of the project.

The following spoke during public comment:

1. Voltaire Montemayor

2. Robert Stromberg

3. Janette Stokley

4. Connie Frenzel
County of Santa Clara Office of Supportive Housing Director, Consuelo Hernandez, provided additional information.

Consultant and Vice President of the John Stewart Company, Warren Reed, provided additional information.

After discussion, motion: to accept the staff report providing an update on the Mil on Main project located at 1380-1400 South Main Street and direct the City Manager to send a letter of support to the 18 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 7
County of Santa Clara for the conversion to a 100% deed-restricted affordable housing project, with onsite support services.

Councilmember Chua made a friendly amendment to provide direction to maximize the rapid rehousing for families if possible, make sure the lease will be broken if a resident commits a felony, ensure social services are comparable to the number of residents based on the ratio, make sure the contract will always be 176 units, 20 units for Intellectual and Developmentally Disabled (IDD), and 24 for Rapid Rehousing (RRH) for the perpetuity of the project, make sure the agreement has to be approved by the City in terms of the contract, and increase the marketing for Milpitas residents.

Mayor Tran and Councilmember Phan accepted the friendly amendments.

Motion/Second: Mayor Tran / Councilmember Phan
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez, Phan, Mayor Tran
NOES: None
RECUSE: Vice Mayor Montano

COMMUNITY SERVICES AND SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE
*18. Review the Proposed Streets, Parks, and Facilities Naming Policy and Provide Feedback to Staff (Staff Contact: Renee Lorentzen, Recreation and Community Services Director, 408-586-3409) *This item was taken out of order
Recreation and Community Services Director Lorentzen presented the staff report.

Mayor Tran requested Robert Livengood’s name be considered for the list for McCandless Park.

Councilmember Dominguez requested the policy include language to prohibit using the names of current Councilmembers approving the policy.

Vice Mayor Montano requested the City reinstate the Facility Naming Council Subcommittee.

Councilmember Chua requested the City be more diversified in naming City structures.

The following spoke during public comment:

1. Voltaire Montemayor
Mayor Tran stated that Council has provided feedback to staff and authorized staff to begin the process of naming McCandless Park.

LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT SERVICES

19. Review the List of Agenda Item Requests From Individual Councilmembers and Provide Direction to Staff, Through the Prioritization Process, on the Items In Groups 1; and Provide Additional Clarification to Staff, If Any, on Group 2 Items (Staff Contact: Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053; Walter C. Rossmann, Deputy City Manager, 408-586-3012) Assistant City Manager Kantak presented the staff report. 19 Item # C2.

May 03, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 8
The following spoke during public comment:

1. Voltaire Montemayor
Council reviewed the list of agenda item requests from individual Councilmembers, and individually voted electronically for five items in group one to advance as a priority.

City Clerk Wood read the result of the vote with the following items receiving a majority of votes and moving forward:

CC 3 Explore Making Temporary 3
rd
-Party Food Delivery Fee Caps Permanent
CC 4 Develop a Plan for Future Solar Panels at City Facilities CC 6 Evaluate Childcare Center Reopening to be Operated by a Non=Profit Organization CC 8 Explore Mural Art on Great Mall Parkway on VTA-Owned Pillars CC 9 Consider Placing City Hall Address on the Building Façade CC 10 Explore a Lease for the Vacant Land Adjacent to the Library for City Use

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Tran adjourned the meeting at 11:39 in memory of Milpitas resident Rodney Schuler. 20 Item # C2.

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL
May 10, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 1

AG END A
TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 455 E CALAVERAS BLVD, MILPITAS, CA The City Council of the City of Milpitas convened for a Special City Council meeting on May 10, 2022, at 5:30 PM in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, and via teleconference/Zoom webinar.

CALL MEETING TO ORDER by Mayor and ROLL CALL by City Clerk Mayor Tran called the special City Council meeting to order at 5:30 PM. Roll Call was taken by City Clerk Wood.

PRESENT: Mayor Tran, Vice Mayor Montano, Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez, and Phan ABSENT: None

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Tran.

PUBLIC FORUM
Those in the audience and via Zoom are invited to address City Council on any subject not on tonight’s agenda. In-person speakers wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the Mayor. In-person speakers will then be asked to come up to the podium and state their name for the record. Those interested in speaking via Zoom may do so by following the instructions on page one (1) of the agenda. Comments may be limited to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion. As an item not listed on the agenda, no response is required from City staff or the Council and no action can be taken. The City Council may instruct the City Manager to place the item on a future meeting agenda.

There were no speakers.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
City Attorney Mutalipassi asked the Mayor and City Councilmembers if they had any personal conflicts of interest. By roll call, there were no conflicts of interest.

READING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CODE OF CONDUCT

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Motion: to approve the May 10, 2022, Special meeting agenda.

Motion/Second: Mayor Tran / Councilmember Chua
Motion carried by the following:

AYES: Councilmembers Chua, Dominguez, Phan, Vice Mayor Montano, Mayor Tran NOES: None
21 Item # C2.

May 10, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 2

AGENDA ITEMS

1. Receive Presentation on the FY 2022-23 Proposed City of Milpitas Operating Budget and Provide Feedback (Staff Contact: Lauren Lai, Finance Director, 408-586-3111) City Manager McHarris introduced the item and Assistant City Manager Kantak and Finance Director Lai presented the staff report.

Mayor Tran requested staff bring back the 115 Pension Trust for performance information.

Building Safety and Housing Director Goei, Public Works Director Ndah, Police Chief Hernandez, Fire Chief Sherrard, Recreation and Community Services Director Lorentzen, and Economic Director Andrade provided additional information.

Vice Mayor Montano requested the City subsidize P.A.L. (Police Athletic League) youth sports.

The following spoke during comment:

1. Jacki Ramirez
Council discussed the referrals and stated they did not want to move forward with a ballot measure for the Mayoral term limits. They confirmed support to move the following items forward as part of staff’s work plan items: Child Center Initial Assessment, Third-party Food Delivery Fee caps, and Lease for 230 N. Main Street.

Council confirmed funding $130,000 for the Homelessness Task Force Feasibility Study of Tiny Homes Village from the Housing Authority Fund and funding $20,000 for the Senior Center Mural from the Public Arts Fund.

Mayor Tran asked if there was support for the following items:

1. Three-day Roller Skate Summer Event for and amount not to exceed $100,000;

2. Ferris Wheel for the fourth of July for an amount not to exceed $55,000;

3. Financial Feasibility Analysis for Solar Panels at City Facilities for an amount not to exceed $25,000; and

4. Design Cost for an Address on the City Hall Façade for an amount not to exceed $20,000.

A majority of Council supported a two-day Skate Summer Event for an amount not to exceed $100,000 and a Financial Feasibility Analysis for Solar Panels at City Facilities for an amount not to exceed $25,000 with direction to staff to seek grant and funding options. Mayor Tran stated the Ferris Wheel and Address on the City Hall Façade will not be funded in the 2022-23 budget.

Council discussed the Murals on VTA (Great Mall) and CalTrans (Main Street) pillars and decided to move forward with funding the VTA Great Mall location for $100,000.

Council confirmed the ARPA funding for the Santa Clara County HEAT (Homeless Engagement and Access Team) is responsive to the Council’s goal of conducting outreach and providing referrals to the unhoused community.

Councilmember Chua requested staff use $58,000 of the remaining APRA funding for the small business grants and reallocate the remaining $70,000 ARPA funding from the hotel grants for a 22 Item # C2.

May 10, 2022 Milpitas City Council Agenda Page 3
total amount of $128,000 to be used to provide additional funding for small businesses that applied for a grant and did not receive one.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Tran adjourned the meeting at 8:45 in memory of Milpitas resident Heserlina Emata.

Draft meeting minutes submitted by City Clerk, Wendy Wood 23 Item # C2.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA PREVIEW LIST
June 7, 2022

CLOSED SESSION
INVOCATION (assigned to Vice Mayor Montano)

PRESENTATION
 Parks and Recreation Month (Proclamation)

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Receive City Council calendar for June 2022 (City Clerk)

2. Approve City Council Regular Meeting minutes of May 17, 2022 (City Clerk)

3. Preview list of items for June 21, 2022 (City Clerk)

4. Councilmember Request List (City Clerk)

5. Resolution calling the November 8, 2022 Election (City Clerk)

6. Adopt a Resolution to Approve Project Plans & Specifications and Award the Construction Contract to Marina Landscape, Inc., for McCandless Park Sports Field, Project No. 5102 (Steve Erickson)

7. Adopt a Resolution to Summarily Vacate an Existing Water Line Easement at 1750 McCandless Dr. (Steve Erickson)

8. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Sole Source Purchase of Body Worn Cameras, Associated Equipment, and Cloud-Based Storage Subscription; and Approve the Master Services and Purchasing Agreement with Axon to Provide Body Worn Cameras, Associated Equipment, and Cloud-Based Storage Subscription in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $182,635.80 for the FY22-23 Year, with a Total Notto-Exceed Amount of $913,178.60 Over the Five-Year Term (John Torrez)

9. Receive an Update on the Emergency Replacement of Two (2) Boilers and the Installation of a Temporary Heating System for the Public Works, Police, and Information Technology Department Buildings; and Determine that the Condition Continues to Constitute an Emergency (Tony Ndah)

10. Amended and Restated Weed Abatement Agreement Between City of Milpitas and the County of Santa Clara Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency - Weed Abatement Program (Albert Zamora)

11. Approve Park and Recreation Donation Application for a Memorial Bench in Honor of Dale Flunoy (Renee Lorentzen)

12. Approve update to the Parks and Recreation Donation Policy (Renee Lorentzen)

PUBLIC HEARING

13. Open the Public Hearing and Adopt Resolutions to Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating Budget for the City of Milpitas and the Milpitas Housing Authority, Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Gann Appropriations Limit, Authorize Various Financial Actions, Fiscal Policies and Budget Guidelines, 24 Item # C3.

Amend the Classification Plan for Alignment with the FY 2022-23 Budget, the Minimum Wage Increase, and Salary Schedules Consistent with Previous Council Action (Lauren Lai)

14. Conduct a Public Hearing and Introduce an Ordinance No. Amending Sections of Chapter 10, Title XI, and Sections of Chapter 100, Title V, of the Milpitas Municipal Code Relating to Mobile Food Vending (Food Trucks) (Ned Thomas)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

15. Receive a Follow-up Presentation from Staff and Provide Direction on Policy Options to Regulate Tobacco Retail Permitting, Flavored Tobacco and Electronic Cigarette Products, and Tobacco Retail Locations (Ned Thomas and Jay Lee)

16. Conduct a Study Session on the Housing Element (Sharon Goei)

COMMUNITY SERVICES

PUBLIC SAFETY

LEADERSHIP

REPORTS
25 Item # C3.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
NOTE:

Deferred and
completed
items are not
listed
2022 OPEN
Request No. Topic Submitted by:

A, F, CM, or
CCM
Date
requested or
Rec'd Form
STATUS and/or DATE scheduled
on City Council meeting agenda:
1 Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission
agendize and explore a comprehensive internet
connectivity plan. Tran A 5/3/2022
2 Consider policies to regulate automated equipment
that would replace a position typically filled by an
employee. Phan A 4/19/2022
3 Explore the use of roundabouts as a traffic calming
mechanism Dominguez A 4/19/2022
4 Explore the policy for locking mechanisms on
shopping carts for large commercial businesses
and would like it brought back to Council sometime
in August, September, or October Tran A 4/19/2022
5 Have staff prepare a report on ghost guns in the
City of Milpitas and look at any State bills that the
Council should be aware of to write a letter of
support; tie it into the gun’s buyback program to
add a further incentive for the ghost guns
Dominguez;
Tran A 4/5/2022
6 Have staff look at the center divider, see what can
be done to help improve safety, and come back
with a report by the budget meeting to see if there
is an opportunity to fund traffic mitigation Dominguez A 4/5/2022 7 Explore an ordinance or policy for parking areas in
Milpitas to reduce thefts and increase security in
the commercial retail areas Chua A 4/5/2022
26 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
8 Crossing guards at McCandless and Montague
Expressway Montano A 4/5/2022
9 Consider funding to implement and create a
homelessness encampment response team to be
dispatched to encampment sites to address
concerns, talked about creating a position to
provide mental health assistance, and would like
this to be brought back for discussion at the budget
meeting Dominguez A 3/15/2022
Will be brought forward as part of the
FY 22-23 budget discussion;
10 Consider expanding the Fee Waiver Policy eligibility to non-profit organizations outside of Milpitas but
the events are specific to Milpitas residents Chua A 3/15/2022 Scheduled for Council discussion by
the end of the Fiscal Year 2021-22
11 Discuss looking at another CSCDA opportunity with
Elanor property for middle-income housing. Tran A 3/15/2022 4/19/2022 Council acknowledged the
capacity restrictions of staff and
because the applicant’s timeline
cannot be met, the project will not
move forward.
12 Add a mobile stage to the Juneteenth event Tran A 3/1/2022 Response sent to the City Council via
email on 4/26/2022
13 Designate the California Oak Tree as the City’s
official heritage tree Montano A 2/1/2022
Will be brought forward for Council
discussion by the end of the fiscal
year 2021-22
14 Requested staff check to see if the City has an
ordinance for house numbers Chua A 12/7/2021
Response sent to the City Council via
email on 4/28/2022
15 Host a Town Hall at City Hall in January, February,
and March for the community to share comments
about the issue of the unhoused. Tran A 11/2/2021
This item was postponed by Mayor
Tran due to the Omicron variant and
a rise in COVID-19 cases
27 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
ACTIVE
Topic Submitted by:

A, F, CM, or
CCM
Date
requested or
Rec'd Form
STATUS and/or DATE scheduled
on City Council meeting agenda:
16 Add Mexican Independence Day to the list of events Montano A 4/5/2022 Staff will bring forward an amendment
to the flag-raising event resolution;
approved on 5/03/2022
17 Bring back a conversation in the budget meeting to
fund “walking beats” in the commercial and high
crime areas Dominguez A 4/5/2022
Councilmember Dominguez will work
with the City Manager to find sources
18 Include a visitor side bleacher strategy for the
Milpitas Knights Pee-Wee football program in the
budgeting process Tran A 3/15/2022
Discussed at the 4/5/2022 City
Council meeting, staff was directed to
identify a low cost option to increase
seating capacity vs. adding
bleachers.
19 City Attorney to look at encampment ordinances
from the cities of Oakland and Los Angeles, or
other regional cities and bring a discussion on the
existing policies to back to Council before the July
recess Tran A 3/15/2022
4/19/2022 Council direct the City
Attorney to make the recommended
changes to the Municipal Code to
remove and prohibit property in public
20 Create a plan for future solar paneling at City
facilities Montano A 3/1/2022
Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved to move
forward at the 5/03/2022 meeting
28 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
21 Fee waiver for the Filipino American South Bay
Community to hold pop-up resource fair at a City
Park Dominguez A 3/1/2022
Staff has engaged with
representatives of the organization to
identify potential eligibility avenues
such as partnering with a Milpitas
based non-profit organization
consistent with the Policy.
22 Agendize an update to the Lobbyist Ordinance for
the next meeting Chua A 3/1/2022
Discussion scheduled for 3/15 City
Council Agenda; At the 3/15/2022
Council Meeting, City Attorney was
directed to bring back a proposed
ordinance amendment for further
discussion
23 A reform of the City’s Speed hump policy Tran A 3/1/2022 The review of the Speed Hump Policy
is an ongoing Council referral. Staff
agendized the item for the April 8,
2022 Transportation Subcommittee
meeting
24 Requested the City Attorney’s office explore
encampment ordinances form the City of Oakland,
Los Angeles, or other regional cities and would like
a discussion on the existing policies to be brought
back before the July recess. Tran A 2/15/2022
4/19/2022 direct the City Attorney to
make the recommended changes to
the Municipal Code to remove and
prohibit property in public
25 Look into putting the City Hall address on the
building facade Montano A 2/1/2022
Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved to move
forward at the 5/03/2022 meeting
26 Evaluate reopening the childcare center with a nonprofit organization running the center Montano A 2/1/2022 Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved to move
forward at the 5/03/2022 meeting
27 Requested an appropriation in an amount not to
exceed $250,000 to procure a contract to address
the streetlights that are pending fieldwork. Tran A 2/1/2022 At this time, staff has sufficient
Council approved resources to
address the remaining streetlight
outages; however, will bring relevant
actions for Council consideration, if
needed.
29 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
28 Explore a lease for the vacant land adjacent to the
Library for City use Tran A 1/18/2022
Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved to move
forward at the 5/03/2022 meeting
29 Requested that staff study the placement of a City
sign for the Milpitas Police Department and explore
the cost of a new sign Dominguez A 1/18/2021
Staff has been working on upgrading
signage and landscaping around the
Police Department and Public Works
Building.
30 Request for the City to make the temporary thirdparty food deliver fee caps permanent and add additional provisions for enforcement Phan A 11/16/2021 Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved to move
forward at the 5/03/2022 meeting
31 Staff to look into mural Art on Great Mall Parkway
on the VTA owned Light rail pillars Montano A 11/16/2021 Scheduled for Spring Quarterly City
Council Workplan Items Prioritization
Discussion; Approved at the
5/03/2022 meeting; discussed
funding at the 5/10/2022 budget
meeting
32 Have a picture of Albert Vogel Sr. put up in the
Senior Center Montano A 10/19/2021
Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting; Staff
engaged the artist of the existing
mural regarding this Council
approved item.
33 Requested an agenda item on November 2 Council
meeting allowing the Council to rescind direction
given to 1355 California Circle and include direction
to allow the project application to move forward
without being tied to a specific plan Chua A 10/19/2021 At the 1/18/2022 council meeting,
Council voted 4-1 to rescind the
direction and direct staff and the
application to explore option one in
the presentation to amend the
General Plan and remove Council
policy for the preparation of a Specific
Plan
30 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
34 Requested staff look into increasing the number of
Park and Recreation Commissioners from seven to
nine. Montano A 10/5/2021
Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting; update to
commission by-laws and
Commissioner handbook scheduled
for approval at the 4/19/2022
meeting; Proposed Bylaw changes
scheduled for Council consideration
at the April 19 Council meeting;
4/19/2022 Council approved
35 Requested staff work with the Vice Mayor and
Mayor to explore and discuss building height limits
near the hillside by January 2022 Tran A 9/21/2021
Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting; l
scheduled for 6/21/2022
36 Requested the City extend the outdoor dining
options through March of next year Phan A 9/21/2021
Planning Director to provide
information on current outdoor dining
extension
37 Work with the school district to have a contest to
create art murals for the pillars on Main Street Montano A 9/7/2021 Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting
38 Partner with the Rotary Club of Silicon Andhra to
promote the stem cell donor outreach with a
webinar and campaign to help increase the number
of donors Chua A 8/17/2021
Staff will include the stem cell donor
information in regularly scheduled
wellness event
39 Include a bust of Maria Lemire on the Mural in front of the Senior Center Montano A 8/17/2021
Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting; Staff
engaged the artist of the existing
mural regarding this Council
approved item.
40 City to highlight mental health resources on the
website Dominguez A 8/17/2021 Staff will issue an Email 41 Look into allowing outdoor music and would like the
ordinance brought back to Council. Montano A 8/5/2021
Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting;
scheduled for 6/21/2022
42 Look into opening up the Senior Center on
Saturdays for half a day Chua A 8/5/2021
As presented by staff on 1/11/2022,
this pilot is scheduled for completion
in fall 2022. In preparation for the
pilot, staff will issue a survey to
seniors asking for the types of
services they are seeking; hire staff
based on the feedback; and start the
three-month pilot in September 2022.
31 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
43 Look into bringing back a roller rink Montano A 8/5/2021 Approved to move forward at the
1/11/2022 Council meeting. Funding
for the program will need to be
prioritized through the FY 22-23
budget process; 5/10/2022 discussed
funding a two day event
44 Look into how the City can be a resource for small
businesses to help guide them on what to do in
terms of ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
requirements due to the quick changes made to
facilities during the pandemic Chua A 8/5/2021
SVEDA/SV Joint Venture hosted the
“SV Small Businesses & ADA
Compliance” webinar on 11/3/21.

Several Milpitas business reps, &
staff from Econ. Dev. & Building
participated. Staff met with reps from
CA Comm. on Disability Access to
discuss business education &
outreach.
45 Discussion in the next fiscal year, to have a sliding scale permitting program for seniors and lowincome residence for necessary safety renovations Tran A 5/4/2021 8/09/2021 Council voted 5-0 to move
this item forward and modify the
existing Milpitas Assistance program
to include seniors; Staff will bring this
item for funding consideration as part
of the FY 2022-23 budget process
46 Discussion to reduce the City’s Senior Center
facilities deposit Montano A 5/4/2021
8/09/2021 Council voted 5-0 to refer
this item as part of the development
of the FY 2022-23 Master Fee
Schedule; Will be brought forward on
4/19 as part of Master Fee Schedule
discussion
47 Requested that the City have mini-libraries in the
low-income areas of the City. Montano A 4/20/2021
8/09/2021 Council voted 3-1-1 to
move this item forward, staff to follow
up with Vice Mayor Montano on
specific vision. Staff met with the Vice
Mayor. The City will continue to
facilitate libraries as needed but will
not take a lead role in funding or
operating them.
48 Staff to create a plan on how to increase the
number of local businesses doing business with the
City Chua A 4/6/2021
At 8/9/2021 Council meeting, Council
voted that this item may have to come
back for additional discussion
because there may be some legal
considerations.
32 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
49 Staff to look into creating a rose garden with a
children’s memorial site Montano A 4/6/2021
8/09/2021 Council voted 4-1 to
discuss details with Vice Mayor
Montano and refer this item as part of
the development of the 2023-2027
CIP; The funding for this project will
be included in the 2023-2027 Capital
Improvement Program scheduled for
adoption on May 3, 2022.
50 Staff to look into creating “Welcome to Milpitas”
signs in key areas of in the City Montano A 4/6/2021
8/09/2021 Council voted 5-0 to move
this item forward and Council
provided direction that the signs
should align with the efforts currently
underway with the Metro Plan and
Main Street Gateway Specific Plan
process and work with private
development. Staff was directed to
work with Vice Mayor on additional
clarification. In November, Vice Mayor
Montano noted a preference for a
location on South Main Street. This
project will be added to unfunded
project list of the 2023-2027 CIP to
allow time for staff to research
potential grant funding and outreach
to local business and service clubs.
51 Staff to provide information to place a measure on
the ballot to change the directly elected Mayor to a
rotational at-large position Tran CCM 3/16/2021
To be brought forward in Spring of
2022, once new City Attorney is in
place; scheduled for 3/15/2022;
rescheduled for 4/05/2022
33 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
52 Staff to provide information on a landmark policy for the City of Milpitas Tran A 3/16/2021
8/09/2021 Council voted 5-0 to move
this item forward; this item will be
included for funding consideration in
the development of the FY 2023-27
CIP for assessment of historical and
cultural resources and development
of landmark policy; The funding for
the assessment of historical and
cultural resources and development
of a landmark policy will be included
in the 2023-2027 Capital
Improvement Program scheduled for
adoption on May 3, 2022. This project
will be scheduled to begin in FY 2022-

23. 53
Amendment to the existing ordinance for third-party
food delivery vendor services to prohibit regulatory
response fees Phan A 2/16/2021
Agendized for discussion on
3/16/2021, deferred to 4/06/2021; CC
direction for City Attorney to prepare a
report; At the 11/12/2021
Transportation Subcommittee, the
Subcommittee directed to bring back
this request to Council as part of the
FY 2022-23 budget process.
54 Ordinance to ban vaping in the City Montano A 12/15/2020 Ordinance regarding a ban on use in
certain areas adopted by Council on
6/15/2021. Policy related to access to
products will be brought forward in
Spring 2022
55 Review City policy on speed bumps Tran A 12/15/2020
Presented to Transportation
Subcommittee on 02/12/2021;voted
on 3/16/2021 to revisit this item;
Scheduled for April 8, 2022
Transportation Subcommittee
Meeting
34 Item # C4.

MILPITAS CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS
56 Consider change in term limits for Mayor +
Councilmembers Montano A 6/16/2020
8/4/2020: Voted 3 -2 to pursue;
2/02/2021 to agendize for a future
meeting; 3/16/2021 voted 3-1-1 to
move forward. Scheduled for
3/15/2022; rescheduled for
4/05/2022; 4/05/2022 could gave
direction to move forward with
Councilmember term limits and
discuss the Mayoral seat at a later
date; 5/10/2022 Council did not want
to move foward with a ballot measure
for the Mayor term limit
35 Item # C4.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Adopt a Resolution Declaring Its Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and Provide Notice of the Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022, for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-1 (LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director 408-586-3301) Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of the Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022, for LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon.

Background:

LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon provides the maintenance and improvement of public landscaping, irrigation systems, and pedestrian walking path adjacent to Sinclair Frontage Road and Los Coches Creek abutting the Sinclair Horizon residential subdivision in the areas as shown on the attached location map.

Analysis:

Before the City Council may levy the annual assessments for LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the Council to adopt a resolution approving the annual Engineer’s Report (Report) evaluating the landscape and lighting maintenance district’s maintenance and improvement costs for fiscal year 2022-23.

On March 1, 2022, the City Council directed the City Engineer to prepare the Report, which is included in the City Council packet. The proposed total assessment for fiscal year 2022-23 is $493.03 per lot, with an assessment rate not exceeding the maximum assessment rate. The FY 2022-23 rate is slightly lower than the previous fiscal year’s rate of $495.19.

City Council must also adopt:
 Resolution approving the Report, and
 Resolution declaring its intent to levy and collect an assessment and direct publishing of notice of a public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 (collectively the “Resolutions”).

Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1:

Not adopt the Resolutions for LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon.

Pros: None.

Cons: The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the legislative body to adopt the Resolutions, and if the City Council does not adopt the Resolutions, the City will not be able to collect assessments for LLMD 98- 1 Sinclair Horizon.
36 Item # C5.

Reason Alternative 1 is Not Recommended: To allow for the continued maintenance and service of LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon, staff recommends approving the Resolutions in order to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2021-22.

Fiscal Impact:

The levy and collection of assessments provides a funding resource for the City to improve and maintain public landscaping, irrigation systems, pedestrian lighting, gateway columns and entry signs within LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon.

California Environmental Quality Act:

Levy and collection of assessment is not considered a project under CEQA as there will be no direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of the Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022, for LLMD 98-1 Sinclair Horizon.

Attachment:

1. Resolution Approving Annual Engineer’s Report

2. Resolution Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments

3. Engineer’s Report LLMD No. 98-1 Sinclair Horizon

4. Location Map
37 Item # C5.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS, APPROVING THE

ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
WHEREAS, the City Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”) to establish the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 98-1 (the “Assessment District”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment District, and the preparation and filing of the report required pursuant to Section 22622 of the Act (the “Annual Report”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolution, ordered NBS to prepare and file such Annual Report; and
WHEREAS, NBS has prepared and filed such Annual Report with the City Clerk.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. Approval of Report: The City Council hereby approves the Annual Report for the Assessment District concerning the levy of assessments as submitted by NBS for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023.

2. The Assessment District exterior boundaries are as shown by a map filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by this reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ____________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
___________________________ ________________________
Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
38 Item # C5.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS,

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
WHEREAS, the City Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”) to establish the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-1 (the “Assessment District”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment District, and the preparation and filing of the report required pursuant to Section 22622 of the Act (the “Annual Report”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Annual Report for the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022/23.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District to pay the costs of the improvements for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023. The City Council finds that the public’s best interest requires such action.

2. Improvements: The improvements within the Assessment District include, but are not limited to: operating, maintaining and servicing of all public landscaping improvements, consisting of landscaping and grass. Operating, maintaining and servicing costs include, but are not limited to: personnel, materials, electrical energy and water. Services provided include all necessary service, operations, administration, and maintenance required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. A project renovating the landscape and irrigation improvements in the Assessment District was initiated in Fiscal Year 2021/22 and will be completed in Fiscal Year 2025/26.

3. Assessment District Boundaries: The boundaries of the Assessment District are as shown by the assessment diagram filed in the offices of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference.

4. Annual Report: Reference is made to the Annual Report prepared by NBS, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and the zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District.

5. Notice of Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the levy of assessments in accordance with Section 22629 of the Act. All objections to the assessment, if any, will be considered by the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 7:00 pm or as soon thereafter as is feasible in the meeting place of the City Council located at 455 E. Calaveras 39 Item # C5.
2 Resolution No. ___
Boulevard, Milpitas, CA 95035. The City Council further orders the City Clerk to publish notice of this resolution in accordance with Section 22626(a) of the Act.

6. Increase of Assessment: The maximum assessment is not proposed to increase from the previous year above that was previously approved by the property owners (as “increased assessment” is defined in Section 54954.6 of the Government Code).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ___________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
____________________________ ________________________
Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
40 Item # C5.
nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Annual Report For:

Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment District No. 98-1
April 2022
41 Item # C5.

CITY OF MILPITAS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-1 455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, California 95035
(408) 586-3000

CITY COUNCIL
Rich Tran, Mayor
Carmen Montano, Vice-Mayor
Evelyn Chua, Council Member
Karina R. Dominguez, Council Member
Anthony Phan, Council Member

CITY STAFF
Steve Erickson, PE, Engineering Director/City Engineer
Lauren Lai, Finance Director
Tony Ndah, Public Works Director
NBS
Tim Seufert, Client Services Director
Adina McCargo, Project Manager
42 Item # C5.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Engineer’s Letter.............................................................................................................1

2. Plans and Specifications..................................................................................................3

2.1 Location of Improvements........................................................................................3

2.2 Landscaping Improvements......................................................................................3

2.3 Capital Improvements...............................................................................................4

2.4 Overhead...................................................................................................................4

3. Estimate of Costs............................................................................................................5

3.1 District Budget...........................................................................................................5

4. Special and General Benefit............................................................................................7

4.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................7

4.2 Special Benefits Identified.........................................................................................7

4.3 General Benefits Identified .......................................................................................8

4.4 Quantification of Benefit...........................................................................................8

5. Method of Assessment ................................................................................................. 13

5.1 Method of Assessment Spread ...............................................................................13

5.2 Maximum Assessment Rates ..................................................................................14

5.3 Appeals....................................................................................................................14

6. Assessment Diagram..................................................................................................... 15

7. Assessment Roll............................................................................................................ 16 43 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 1

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, in 1998 the City Council of the City of Milpitas (the “City”), State of California, under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), created the City of Milpitas Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-1 (the “District”) to provide for the continued maintenance, operation, and administration of various improvements within the boundaries of the District; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed NBS to prepare and file a report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 of the Act presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained; an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate, and service the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year; a diagram for the District showing the area and properties to be assessed; and an assessment of the estimated costs to maintain and service the improvements, stating the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.

NOW THEREFORE, the following assessments have been calculated in accordance with the assessment methodology adopted and approved by the City Council at the time of District formation, and are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation, and servicing of the improvements, to be paid by the assessable real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received:

District Parcels
2022/23
Maximum Assessment
Rate per Lot(1)
2022/23
Actual Assessment
Rate per Lot
2022/23
Net Amount to be
Assessed(2)(3)
LLMAD 98-1 98 $533.31 $493.03 $48,317.00
(1) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated using the February 2022/23 CPI.
(2) Amounts placed on the tax roll include the 1% Santa Clara County Collection Fee. (3) This amount is only an estimate and does not reflect the final billed amount with rounding adjustments. Refer to Section 7 for the rounded figure.

I identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in District’s Plans and Specifications section of this Engineer’s Report (the “Benefited Parcels”).

For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

I have assessed the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Benefited Parcels. In making such assessment:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.
44 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 2
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer’s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagrams herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Milpitas, the Act, and Article XIIID.

Steven Erickson, PE
Engineering Director/City Engineer
45 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 3

2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the continued administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.

2.1 Location of Improvements
The District is located in the City of Milpitas, bounded on the east by Sinclair Frontage Road, on the west by Berryessa Creek, and on the north by Los Coches Street. The improvements maintained include public landscaping and irrigation improvements, including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, and ornamental planting, which are primarily situated within the public rights-of-way and dedicated public by easements within the District.

2.2 Landscaping Improvements
The landscaping and irrigation improvements were installed within the District in order to enhance the overall visual appearance for adjacent parcels. The improvements consist of the maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements adjacent to curbs, including asphalt concrete jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, and appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental planting including lawns, shrubs, and trees, including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. The landscaping and irrigation improvements are collectively referred to as “landscaping improvements.” All such work will be performed in the following areas:

2.2.1 BERRYESSA CREEK
Due to the widening of the creek, improvements in Berryessa Creek were removed. Any improvements maintained in this reach (asphalt concrete jogging path, exercise equipment, planting, and irrigation) will no longer be maintained or improved.

2.2.2 LOS COCHES CREEK

1. A strip of land 812 feet long, 14 feet in width along the south bank of Los Coches Creek adjacent to Tract 9018. The improvements include an asphalt concrete jogging path, exercise equipment, planting, and irrigation.

2. A strip of land 5.5 feet wide within the Los Coches Street right-of-way between the back of sidewalk and the right-of-way along the south side of Los Coches Street between Berryessa Creek and Sinclair Frontage Rd. The improvements include planting and irrigation. 46 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 4

2.3 Capital Improvements
In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the City initiated the design and construction of landscape and irrigation renovation along portions of Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road. Design and construction is anticipated to continue through Fiscal Year 2022/23. Capital Improvements are scheduled to be complete by June 30, 2027.

2.4 Overhead
In addition to the hard costs of maintaining the improvements mentioned above, the City will incur costs for staff time and expenses related to the management and maintenance of the improvements within the District. Staff time includes oversight and coordination of both City and contractor provided services, annual tax roll preparation, and addressing property owner questions and concerns. These activities are directly related to the maintenance of the improvements, and without them the improvements could not be efficiently completed or properly maintained on an ongoing basis. 47 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 5

3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below.

3.1 District Budget
The Fiscal Year 2022/23 estimated cost budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements is as follows:

Description Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget
Maintenance Staff(1) $30,000
Capital Equipment 0
Supplies 1,800
Utilities (Water, Electricity) 19,000
Reserve Fund 2,683
Capital Improvement Program 11,000
Maintenance Costs $64,483
NBS $3,450
City Staff District Administration 400
County Auditor-Controller Fee(2) 490
District Specific Costs $4,340
Total District Costs $68,823
General Benefit Contribution(3) (20,506)
Operating Reserve Contribution 0
Capital Improvement Fund Contribution 0
Net Amount to be Assessed $48,317
Total District Lots 98
Rate per Lot(4) $493.03
Maximum Rate Per Lot – 2022/23
(5) $533.31
(1) The City’s Department of Public Works is the provider of Maintenance Services. (2) County Auditor-Controller Fee is currently 1% of the total levy submittal. (3) General Benefit Contribution is not applied to District Specific Costs as these are special benefits to the District. (4) The Rate per lot equals the Net Amount to be Assessed / Total District Lots. The Rate cannot exceed the maximum rate. (5) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated by using the February 2022/23 CPI.
48 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 6

3.1.1 OPERATING RESERVE
It is the intent of the City to maintain an operating reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments from the County, whichever is later. The operating reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/2022 Operating Reserve Cash Balance $22,317 Operating Reserve Collection for Fiscal Year 2022/23 2,683 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/2023 Operating Reserve Cash Balance $25,000

3.1.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the City initiated the design and construction of landscape and irrigation renovation along portions of Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road. As of December 31, 2021, the balance available for the Capital Improvement Project was $165,000. The City will utilize these funds, along with an annual collection of $11,000 via the District from Fiscal Year 2022/23 to Fiscal Year 2026/27, to finance the project.

Capital Improvements are scheduled to be complete by June 30, 2027. 49 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 7

4. SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT
The improvements defined in Section 2 are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The special benefits are described in this section. Figures in this section are derived from a Special v. General Benefit Analysis performed in Fiscal Year 2014/15.

4.1 Introduction
Pursuant to Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the installation, implementation and maintenance of the improvements, services and activities shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the installation, implementation and maintenance of the improvements, services and activities.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Proposition 218 requires that the City separate the general benefit from special benefit, so that only special benefit may be assessed to properties within the District. Furthermore, Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

4.2 Special Benefits Identified
The improvements described in Section 2 are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The special benefits conferred to property within the District can be grouped into two primary benefit categories: aesthetic benefit and safety benefit. The two district benefit categories are further expanded upon below.
• Improved Aesthetics: The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the improvements within the District. Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The overall appeal of the District is enhanced when improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal decreases when improvements are not well-maintained, unsafe, or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community1. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents and visitors to the community2. • Increased Safety: Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study found that after landscape improvements were installed, there 1 Victoria Transport Policy Institute. (2011). Community Livability. Helping to Create Attractive, Safe, Cohesive Communities. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm97.htm.
2 Ibid.
50 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 8
was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces3. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions can significantly reduce collisions4.

4.3 General Benefits Identified
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

General benefit is an overall and similar benefit to the public at large resulting from the maintenance of the District’s improvements provided by the assessments levied. The improvements to be maintained by the District are located within the District boundaries only. There will be no District maintenance activities provided for improvements located outside of the District boundaries.

The ongoing maintenance of the District improvements will provide aesthetic and safety benefits to the property within the District. However, it is recognized that the ongoing District maintenance activities will also provide a level of benefit to some property within proximity to the District, as well as individuals passing through. Therefore, the general benefit created as a result of the District maintenance activities has been considered.

4.4 Quantification of Benefit
As a result of the maintenance and operation of the improvements, there will be a level of general benefit to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the district’s maintenance activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District’s maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners’ assessments.

The landscaping improvements are primarily located along Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road and within the subdivision along Los Coches Creek and Berryessa Creek. A portion of the maintained landscaping provides some general benefit to pass-thru traffic. Per the City, there is 52,912 square feet of landscaping being maintained.

Los Coches Creek and Berryessa Creek
As result of the District maintenance activities, there will be a level of general benefit to pedestrians and vehicular traffic that are not associated with property in the District. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v.

County of Riverside (2010), “... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement 3 Wolf, Kathleen L. (2010). Safe Streets – A Literature Review. In: Green Cities: Good Health (www.greenhealth.washington.edu). College of the Environment, University of Washington.
4 Victoria Transport Policy Institute. (2011). Community Livability. Helping to Create Attractive, Safe, Cohesive Communities. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm97.htm.
51 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 9
projects provide general benefits." A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the “general public” for purposes of determining general benefit. The landscaping improvements along the south side of Los Coches Creek and Berryessa Creek are local in nature, however even though they are intended primarily for localized access, there is some portion of pedestrian traffic that may not be accessing the adjacent properties. The landscaping improvements are located adjacent to the backyard of homes, and access is only available by walking or bicycling. There is no vehicular access to these improvements.

The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S.

Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation, and 2,066 (in millions) or 1.14% of those person trips were made by bicycling5.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 3.34 persons6. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 98 residential units within the District, there are approximately 327 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 163 residential units in close proximity, but outside of the District boundaries. Based on the City’s average household size, there are approximately 544 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but have access to the landscaping improvements.

Community
Estimated Number
of Residential Units
Estimated
Number of Persons(1)
District 98 327
Sundrop Subdivision 83 277
Sinclair Renaissance Subdivision 80 267
Total Residential Population 261 871
(1) U.S. Census Bureau (2010) average household size in the City is 3.34 persons.7 In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the landscaping improvements, and would utilize walking or bicycling as their mode of transportation, we applied the 12.84% (11.70% walking, 1.14% bicycling) of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total nearby residential population (871). There are approximately 112 people within close proximity of the District that utilize walking or bicycling as their mode of transportation.

In order to determine the portion of the 112 persons that reside within the District, we applied the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage (12.84%) to the District population (327). Approximately 42 people within the District boundaries use walking or bicycling as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total 5 U.S Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. (Report No. FHWA-PL-11-022). Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov 6 U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010, 2010 Demographic Profile Data. Milpitas, C.A. Retrieved March 23, 2015, http://quickf acts.census.gov/qf d/states/06/0647766.html 7 Ibid.
52 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 10
surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity the landscaping improvements, that uses walking or bicycling as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 70 people.

Community
Estimated Number of
Persons
District 42
Sundrop Subdivision 36
Sinclair Renaissance Subdivision 34
Walking or Bicycling Population 112
In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the landscaping improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking or bicycling as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use the District improvements, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the reported walking (21,252 in millions) and bicycling (2,066 in millions) trips; based on the property types people entering the District would most likely do so for social or recreational activities.

The following details the number of walking and bicycling trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the landscaping improvements:

Trip Purpose
Number of Walking or
Bicycling Trips (in millions)
Social/Recreational 6,442
Total 6,442
Of the total number of walking and bicycling trips reported, 6,442 (in millions) or 27.63% are for purposes that persons outside of the District may use the landscaping improvements. Applying this percentage (27.63%) to the number of people walking or bicycling as their mode of transportation and that reside outside of the District (70), there are approximately 19 people (general benefit) that may use the landscaping improvements, but do not reside within the District. Taking the 19 people that may walk or bicycle, but reside outside of the District, divided by total residential population with access to the landscaping improvements (871), the estimated percentage of persons, engaging in what is considered general benefit because they do not reside within the District, represents 2.21%.

Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road
The City does not have a study showing traffic volume along Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road along the District boundaries. The portion of the maintained landscaping that is located along Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic. Before the determination and allocation of the percentage of special and general benefit for the District can be made, the estimated pass-through traffic must be computed. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not living or conducting business in the District and benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place. 53 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 11
The Sundrop and Sinclair Renaissance residential communities are located directly across the street and next to the District, and vehicles entering and/or exiting these communities in all likelihood are passing by a portion of the landscaping improvements for a portion of their trip. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic, the estimated number of trips generated for each community has been calculated based on the number of units and average number of trips per dwelling unit.

Community
Number of
Residential Units(1)
Estimated Number of
Daily Vehicle Trips(2)
% of Total Daily
Vehicle Trips(3)
District 98 933.0 44.34%
Sundrop Subdivision 83 790.2 37.56%
Sinclair Renaissance Subdivision 80 380.8 18.10%
Total 261 2,104.0 100.00%
(1) Number of Residential Units is from the City’s Approved Projects map.8 (2) Per the ITE Trip Generation Report a single family residence generates an average of 9.52 trips per dwelling unit.9 (3) Number of daily trips has been reduced by 50% to account for vehicles entering and exiting the community from the opposite direction on Sinclair Frontage Road, and not driving along the portion of Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road with landscaping improvements maintained by the District.

As detailed above, based on the average number of daily vehicle trips generated for the communities in close proximity to the District, 1,171 (55.66%) are generated by residential units located outside of the District (general benefit).

All Locations and Landscaping Improvements – Residential Pass-thru Benefit The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections for Los Coches Creek and Berryessa Creek (2.21%) and Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road (55.66%) were then applied to each corresponding location with landscaping improvements. The landscaping square footage being maintained by the District was provided by the City’s Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage for each street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the combined general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation.

Street Name
Total Square
Footage
General Benefit
Percentage
General Benefit Square
Footage
Los Coches Creek 4,572 2.21% 101
Berryessa Creek 21,025 2.21% 465
Los Coches Street 24,747 55.66% 13,773
Sinclair Frontage 2,568 55.66% 1,429
Totals: 52,912 15,768
Landscaping General Benefit 29.80%
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and increased safety resulting from the landscaping improvements is estimated to be 29.80%. 8 City of Milpitas. (2013). Approved Development Projects. Retrieved from http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/government/planning/proj_approved.asp 9 Trip Generation, 9th Edition: An Informational Report of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2012). Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. 54 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 12
Public at Large General Benefit
Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the landscaping improvements within the District. In addition, there are more direct routes to access the industrial complexes/businesses located to the south of the District than the 2 lane Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road. Nevertheless, it is perceivable that members of the public at large may passthru a portion of the landscaping improvements, even if it’s lost or leisure traffic. As such, general benefit of 2.00% has been assigned for the landscaping improvements to the public at large

4.4.1 COLLECTIVE DISTRICT-WIDE GENERAL BENEFIT
Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics and increased safety benefits resulting from the collective landscaping improvements, the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles, and the public at large must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. The sum of the calculated general benefits is the total general benefit related to all pass-thru traffic. This general benefit result is provided in the table below:

Residential Pass-thru General Benefit 29.80%
Public at Large General Benefit 2.00%
Total General Benefit 31.80%
The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 31.80%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 68.20%.
55 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 13

5. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT

5.1 Method of Assessment Spread
All parcels in the District on which residential dwellings will be constructed specially benefit from the improvements to an equivalent extent. These parcels are therefore assessed on a per lot basis for the maintenance and operation of the District, including incidentals and appurtenances, and will include all the costs of maintenance and/or operating the improvements. As outlined in Section 4, the total amount of general benefit from the improvements is determined to be 31.80%.

The preliminary maximum assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2022/23 is $533.31. The actual assessment rate levied on each taxable parcel for Fiscal Year 2022/23 is $493.03.

Each year the maximum assessment rate shall be increased by the percentage change from April 1st of the prior year to April 1st of the current year by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. For purposes of this report, the CPI increase was estimated by using the February 2022/23 CPI.
56 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 14

5.2 Maximum Assessment Rates
The following table provides the historical maximum assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2000/01 through the current fiscal year:

Fiscal Year CPI Percentage Increase(1) Maximum Rate
2000/01 178.7 N/A $292.803
2001/02 189.1 5.82% 309.844
2002/03 193.0 2.06% 316.234
2003/04 197.3 2.23% 323.280
2004/05 198.3 0.51% 324.918
2005/06 202.5 2.12% 331.800
2006/07 208.9 3.16% 342.286
2007/08 215.842 3.32% 353.661
2008/09 222.074 2.89% 363.872
2009/10 223.854 0.80% 366.789
2010/11 227.697 1.72% 373.086
2011/12 234.121 2.82% 383.611
2012/13 238.985 2.08% 391.581
2013/14 244.675 2.38% 400.904
2014/15 251.495 2.79% 412.079
2015/16 257.622 2.44% 422.118
2016/17 264.565 2.70% 433.494
2017/18 274.589 3.79% 449.919
2018/19 283.422 3.22% 464.392
2019/20 294.801 4.01% 483.037
2020/21 298.074 1.11% 488.400
2021/22 309.419 3.81% 506.988
2022/23 320.195 5.19%
(2) 533.318
(1) Percentage increase from April 1 of the prior year to April 1 of the current year in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, Pacific Cities and US City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. (2) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated using the February 2022/23 CPI.

5.3 Appeals
Any property owner who feels that the amount of their assessment is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of spread, may file an appeal with the Finance Director of the City. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the current or, if before July 1, the upcoming fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Finance Director shall promptly review the information provided by the property owner and if he/she finds that the assessment should be modified, he/she shall have the authority to make the appropriate changes in the assessment roll. If any such changes are provided after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Finance Director is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction.
57 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 15

6. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following page provides a copy of the assessment diagram of the District. 58 Item # C5.
59 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 98-1 Annual Report 16

7. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessor’s parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be based on the Santa Clara County Assessor’s secured roll data for the applicable year in which this report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of assessor’s parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the Santa Clara County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount. 60 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
LLMAD No. 98-1
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN Assessment ID Situs Address Fiscal Year 2022/23 Levy 086-48-001 1 872 CAMERON CIR $493.02
086-48-002 2 868 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-003 3 864 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-004 4 860 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-005 5 856 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-006 6 852 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-007 7 848 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-008 8 844 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-009 9 840 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-010 10 836 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-011 11 832 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-012 12 828 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-013 13 824 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-014 14 820 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-015 15 816 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-016 16 812 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-017 17 808 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-018 18 804 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-019 19 800 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-020 20 1004 CAMERON PL 493.02
086-48-021 21 1000 CAMERON PL 493.02
086-48-022 22 996 CAMERON PL 493.02
086-48-023 23 992 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-024 24 988 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-025 25 984 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-026 26 980 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-027 27 976 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-028 28 972 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-029 29 968 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-030 30 964 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-031 31 960 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-032 32 956 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-033 33 952 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-034 34 948 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-035 35 944 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-036 36 940 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-037 37 936 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-038 38 932 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-039 39 928 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-040 40 924 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-041 41 920 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-042 42 916 CAMERON CIR 493.02
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 3 04/08/2022 06:56:10PM61 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
LLMAD No. 98-1
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN Assessment ID Situs Address Fiscal Year 2022/23 Levy 086-48-043 43 912 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-044 44 908 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-045 45 904 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-046 46 900 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-047 47 896 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-048 48 892 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-049 49 888 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-050 50 884 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-051 51 880 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-052 52 876 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-053 53 899 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-054 54 903 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-055 55 907 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-056 56 911 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-057 57 915 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-058 58 211 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-059 59 203 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-060 60 195 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-061 61 200 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-062 62 208 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-063 63 216 CAMERON CT 493.02
086-48-064 64 207 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-065 65 199 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-066 66 191 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-067 67 183 ALLEN CT 493.02
086-48-068 68 175 ALLEN CT 493.02
086-48-069 69 180 ALLEN CT 493.02
086-48-070 70 188 ALLEN CT 493.02
086-48-071 71 196 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-072 72 204 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-073 73 212 WHITE CT 493.02
086-48-074 74 203 KING CT 493.02
086-48-075 75 195 KING CT 493.02
086-48-076 76 187 KING CT 493.02
086-48-077 77 179 BRANDT CT 493.02
086-48-078 78 171 BRANDT CT 493.02
086-48-079 79 176 BRANDT CT 493.02
086-48-080 80 184 BRANDT CT 493.02
086-48-081 81 192 KING CT 493.02
086-48-082 82 200 KING CT 493.02
086-48-083 83 208 KING CT 493.02
086-48-084 84 199 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 3 04/08/2022 06:56:10PM62 Item # C5.

City of Milpitas
LLMAD No. 98-1
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN Assessment ID Situs Address Fiscal Year 2022/23 Levy 086-48-085 85 191 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
086-48-086 86 183 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
086-48-087 87 175 HOBBS CT 493.02
086-48-088 88 167 HOBBS CT 493.02
086-48-089 89 174 HOBBS CT 493.02
086-48-090 90 182 HOBBS CT 493.02
086-48-091 91 190 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
086-48-092 92 198 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
086-48-093 93 206 DOUGLAS CT 493.02
086-48-094 94 991 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-095 95 995 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-096 96 811 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-097 97 815 CAMERON CIR 493.02
086-48-098 98 831 CAMERON CIR 493.02
98 Accounts $48,315.96
$48,315.96 98 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 3 04/08/2022 06:56:10PM63 Item # C5.

HILLVIEW CAMERON ST PL (PVT)
DR I - 680 LOS COCHES ST. SINCLAIR FRONTAGE RD.

BERRYESSA CREEK LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD) 98-1 CITY OF MILPITAS (N.T.S.) 2022-2023 FISCAL YEAR LANDSCAPE AREA FUNDED FOR MAINTENANCE

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, Adopt a Resolution Declaring Its Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments, and Provide Notice of Public Hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-1 (LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch) (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director 408-586-3301) Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.

Background:

LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch provides the maintenance and improvement of public landscaping, irrigation systems, pedestrian lighting, gateway columns and entry signs along portions of North McCarthy Boulevard and the Ranch Drive gateway between State Route 237 and Dixon Landing Road in the areas as shown on the attached location map.

Analysis:

Before the City Council may levy the annual assessments for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the City Council to adopt a resolution approving the annual Engineer’s Report (Report) evaluating the landscape and lighting maintenance district’s maintenance and improvement costs for fiscal year 2022-23.

On March 1, 2022, the City Council directed the City Engineer to prepare the Report, which is included in the City Council packet. The proposed total assessment for fiscal year 2022-23 is $0.0349 per lot square foot with an assessment rate not exceeding the maximum assessment rate. The FY 2022-23 rate is approximately

4.49% higher than the previous year FY 2021-22 rate of $0.03330.

City Council must also adopt:
 Resolution approving the Report, and
 Resolution declaring its intent to levy and collect an assessment and direct publishing of notice of a public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 (collectively the “Resolutions”).

Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1:

Not adopt the Resolutions for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.

Pros: None.

Cons: The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the legislative body to adopt the Resolutions, and if the City Council does not adopt the Resolutions, the City’s will not be able to collect to assessments for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.
65 Item # C6.

Reason Alternative 1 is Not Recommended: To allow for the continued maintenance and service of LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch, staff recommends approving the Resolutions into order to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 2022-23.

Fiscal Impact:

The levy and collection of assessments provides a funding resource for the City to improve and maintain public landscaping, irrigation systems, pedestrian lighting, gateway columns and entry signs within LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.

California Environmental Quality Act:

Levy and collection of assessment is not considered a project under CEQA as there will be no direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Engineer’s Report, adopt a resolution declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments, and provide notice of public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022 for LLMD 95-1 McCarthy Ranch.

Attachment:

1. Resolution Approving Annual Engineer’s Report

2. Resolution Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments

3. Engineer’s Report LLMD No. 95-1 McCarthy Ranch

4. Location Map
66 Item # C6.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS,

APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
The City Council of the City of Milpitas (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”) to establish the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 95-1 (the “Assessment District”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment District, and the preparation and filing of and the report required pursuant to Section 22622 of the Act (the “Annual Report”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolution, ordered NBS to prepare and file such Annual Report; and
WHEREAS, NBS has prepared and filed such Annual Report with the City Clerk.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Approval of Report: The City Council hereby approves the Annual Report for the Assessment District concerning the levy of assessments as submitted by NBS for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023.

2. The Assessment District exterior boundaries are as shown by a map filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by this reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________ ________________________
Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
67 Item # C6.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS,

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
The City Council of the City of Milpitas (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”) to establish the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-1 (the “Assessment District”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Assessment District, and the preparation and filing of the report required pursuant to Section 22622 of the Act (the “Annual Report”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Annual Report for the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022/23.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District to pay the costs of the Improvements for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023. The City Council finds that the public’s best interest requires such action.

2. Improvements: The improvements within the Assessment District include, but are not limited to:
operating, maintaining and servicing of all public landscaping improvements, consisting of landscaping and grass. Operating, maintaining and servicing costs include, but are not limited to:
personnel, materials, electrical energy and water. Services provided include all necessary service, operations, administration, and maintenance required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. A project renovating the landscape and irrigation improvements in the Assessment District will be completed in Fiscal Year 2022/23.

3. Assessment District Boundaries: The boundaries of the Assessment District are as shown by the assessment diagram filed in the offices of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference.

4. Annual Report: Reference is made to the Annual Report prepared by NBS, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and the zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District.

5. Notice of Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the levy of assessments in accordance with Section 22629 of the Act. All objections to the assessment, if any, will be considered by the City Council. The public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 7:00 pm or as soon thereafter as is feasible in the 68 Item # C6.
meeting place of the City Council located at 455 E. Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, CA 95035. The City Council further orders the City Clerk to publish notice of this resolution in accordance with Section 22626(a) of the Act.

6. Increase of Assessment: The maximum assessment is not proposed to increase from the previous year above that was previously approved by the property owners (as “increased assessment” is defined in Section 54954.6 of the Government Code).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________ ________________________
Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
69 Item # C6.
nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Annual Report For:

Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment District No. 95-1
April 2022
70 Item # C6.

CITY OF MILPITAS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, California 95035
Phone (408) 586-3000

CITY COUNCIL
Rich Tran, Mayor
Carmen Montano, Vice-Mayor
Evelyn Chua, Council Member
Karina R. Dominguez, Council Member
Anthony Phan, Council Member

CITY STAFF
Steve Erickson, PE, Engineering Director/City Engineer
Lauren Lai, Finance Director
Tony Ndah, Public Works Director
NBS
Tim Seufert, Client Services Director
Adina McCargo, Project Manager
71 Item # C6.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Engineer’s Letter.............................................................................................................1

2. Plans and Specifications..................................................................................................3

2.1 Location of Improvements........................................................................................3

2.2 Landscaping Improvements......................................................................................3

2.3 Capital Improvements...............................................................................................4

2.4 Overhead...................................................................................................................4

3. Estimate of Costs............................................................................................................5

3.1 District Budget...........................................................................................................5

4. Special and General Benefit ............................................................................................7

4.1 Identification of Benefit ............................................................................................7

4.2 Special Benefits Identified.........................................................................................7

4.3 General Benefits Identified .......................................................................................8

4.4 Quantification of Benefit...........................................................................................8

4.5 Special Benefit Trips................................................................................................12

5. Method of Assessment ................................................................................................. 15

5.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................15

5.2 Method of Assessment Spread ...............................................................................15

5.3 Maximum Assessment Rates ..................................................................................16

5.4 Appeals....................................................................................................................16

6. Assessment Diagram..................................................................................................... 17

7. Assessment Roll............................................................................................................ 18 72 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 1

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, in 1995 the City Council of the City of Milpitas (the “City”), State of California, under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), created the City of Milpitas Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 95-1 (the “District”) in order to provide for the continued maintenance, operation, and administration of various improvements within the boundaries of the District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed NBS to prepare and file a report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 of the Act presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained; an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate, and service the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year; a diagram for the District showing the area and properties to be assessed; and an assessment of the estimated costs to maintain and service the improvements, stating the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.

NOW THEREFORE, the following assessments have been calculated in accordance with the assessment methodology adopted and approved by the City Council at the time of District formation, and are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance, operation, and servicing of the improvements, to be paid by the assessable real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received:

District Parcels
2022/23
Maximum Assessment
Rate per Lot Sq. Ft.(1)
2022/23
Actual Assessment
Rate per Lot Sq. Ft.
2022/23
Net Amount to be
Assessed(2)(3)
LLMAD 95-1 44 $0.0516 $0.0349 $411,156
(1) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated using the February 2022/23 CPI.
(2) Amounts placed on the tax roll include the 1% Santa Clara County Collection Fee. (3) This amount is only an estimate and does not reflect the final billed amount with rounding adjustments. Refer to Section 7 for the rounded figure.

I identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvements described in District’s Plans and Specifications section of this Engineer’s Report (the “Benefited Parcels”).

For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

I have assessed the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Benefited Parcels. In making such assessment:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.
73 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 2
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer’s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagrams herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Milpitas, the Act, and Article XIIID.

Steven Erickson, PE
Engineering Director/City Engineer
74 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 3

2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the continued administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.

2.1 Location of Improvements
The District is located on the west side of the City of Milpitas, bounded on the east by State Route 880, on the west by Coyote Creek, on the south by State Route 237, and on the north by Dixon Landing Road. The improvements maintained include public landscaping and irrigation improvements, including jogging paths, pedestrian lighting, gateway improvements, and entry signage, which are primarily situated within the public right-of-way and dedicated public easements within the District.

2.2 Landscaping Improvements
Landscaping, pedestrian lighting, gateway, and signage improvements were installed along the roadways and sidewalks within the District to enhance the overall visual appearance for adjacent parcels.

The improvements within the District consist of the maintenance and installation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements adjacent to curbs of the following described streets, including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, pedestrian lighting and appurtenant irrigation systems, ornamental planting including lawns, shrubs, and trees; installation and maintenance of gateway columns and entry signs. Such maintenance includes all necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal and all other items of work necessary and incidental for property maintenance and operation thereof. The landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian lighting, gateway, and signage improvements are collectively referred to as “landscaping improvements.” All such work will be performed in the following areas:

2.2.1 N. MCCARTHY BOULEVARD

1. A strip of land including an earth berm approximately 50 feet in width from face of each curb line, from the southerly connection with Ranch Drive northerly 2,400 feet, more or less, to the northerly connection with Ranch Drive. A strip of land including a grass berm approximately 35 feet in width, west of the face of westerly curb, along the West Side of N. McCarthy Boulevard, from the southerly connection with Ranch Drive, northerly 2,400 feet, more or less. The initial phase includes a strip of land 6 feet wide on the west side of McCarthy Boulevard.

2. Commencing at a location approximately 2,400 feet north of State Route 237 thence proceeding north to the northern boundary of Lands of N. McCarthy, 7,800 feet more or less, a strip of land approximately 27 to 34 feet in width on each side along the east and west sides of McCarthy Boulevard between the northerly connection with Ranch Drive and Dixon Landing Road.

3. A median island from the southerly intersection with Ranch Drive northerly to the intersection with Dixon Landing Road.
75 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 4

4. Gateway Improvements, at the southerly intersection of N. McCarthy Boulevard and Ranch Drive and southerly of Bridge No. 1 along N. McCarthy Boulevard, including curved stone planter walls, gateway columns with entry sign appurtenant mounding ornamental plantings including flat work, trees and ground cover, irrigation systems; all as shown on landscape plans.

5. Lighting costs in the District are limited to the supplemental pedestrian lights installed on the east side of McCarthy Boulevard between the two intersections at Ranch Drive and McCarthy Boulevard. The conventional lighting along McCarthy Boulevard is not included. There also exists decorative up-lighting for the Gateway Towers in other areas near the southern Ranch Drive intersection of McCarthy.

2.2.2 MILPITAS ENTRY SIGN

1. City of Milpitas Entry Identification Sign along N. McCarthy Blvd., including walls, columns, lighting, and other appurtenances.

2.2.3 RANCH DRIVE

1. Commencing at a Northerly location where the right-of-way of Ranch Drive is contiguous with the right-of-way of Interstate 880, thence southerly, a strip of land approximately 10 feet in width measured from the east face of curb of Ranch Drive, from the northerly connection with Interstate 880 and Ranch Drive, southerly 630 feet, more or less, thence 405 feet south to the southerly end of Gateway location, varying in width from 10 feet to 132 feet, more or less.

2. Gateway Improvements, at the southerly connection of Ranch Drive and Interstate 880, including curved stone planter walls, gateway columns with entry sign appurtenant mounding ornamental plantings including flat work, trees and ground cover, irrigation systems; all as shown on landscape plans (Part A), except the Shopping Center’s Monument Sign. As mentioned above, there also exists decorative up-lighting for the Gateway Towers in other areas near the southern Ranch Drive intersection of McCarthy.

2.3 Capital Improvements
In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the City initiated the design and construction of landscape and irrigation renovation on N. McCarthy Blvd. between State Route 237 and Dixon Landing Road and a portion of Ranch Drive.

Landscape and irrigation renovation design and construction are scheduled to start in 2022.

2.4 Overhead
In addition to the hard costs of maintaining the improvements mentioned above, the City will incur costs for staff time and expenses related to the management and maintenance of the improvements within the District. Staff time includes oversight and coordination of both City and contractor provided services, annual tax roll preparation, and addressing property owner questions and concerns. These activities are directly related to the maintenance of the improvements, and without them the improvements could not be efficiently completed or properly maintained on an ongoing basis. 76 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 5

3. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below.

3.1 District Budget
The Fiscal Year 2022/23 estimated cost budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements is as follows:

Description Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget
Maintenance Staff and Contract Services(1) $270,000
Capital Equipment 0
Supplies 35,800
Utilities (Water, Electricity) 92,500
Reserve Fund 25,500
Capital Improvement Program 0
Maintenance Costs $423,800
NBS $4,350
City Staff District Administration 400
County Auditor-Controller Fee(2) 3,966
District Specific Costs $8,716
Total District Costs $432,516
General Benefit Contribution(3) (21,360)
Operating Reserve Contribution 0
Net Amount to be Assessed $411,156
Total District Square Footage(4) 11,792,520
Rate per Square Foot(5)(6) $0.0349
Maximum Rate Per Square Foot – 2022/23
(7) $0.0516
(1) Fiscal 2022/23 Landscape Maintenance Contract Services includes Terracare and Irvine Company. (2) County Auditor-Controller Fee is currently 1% of the total levy submittal. (3) General Benefit Contribution is not applied to District Specific Costs as these are special benefits to the District. (4) Total District Square Footage includes the 50% reduction for Parcel 5-7 (Sewer Main Pump Station) and Parcel 5-3C (Storm Pump Station).
(5) The Rate per Square Foot equals the Net Amount to be Assessed / Total District Square Footage. (6) The assessed rate cannot exceed the maximum rate.
(7) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated by using the February 2022/23 CPI.
77 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 6

3.1.1 OPERATING RESERVE
It is the intent of the City to maintain an operating reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments from the County, whichever is later. The operating reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/2022 Operating Reserve Cash Balance $75,000 Operating Reserve Collection for Fiscal Year 2022/23 25,500 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/2023 Operating Reserve Cash Balance $100,500

3.1.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
The City will begin the design and construction of landscape and irrigation renovation on N. McCarthy Blvd. between State Route 237 and Dixon Landing Road and a portion of Ranch Drive in 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the balance available for the Capital Improvement Project was $520,000. The City will utilize these funds to finance the project.
78 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 7

4. SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT
The improvements defined in Section 2 are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The special benefits are described in this section. Figures in this section are derived from a Special v. General Benefit Analysis performed in Fiscal Year 2020/21.

4.1 Identification of Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

4.2 Special Benefits Identified
The improvements described in Section 2 are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The special benefits conferred to property within the District can be grouped into three primary benefit categories: aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic benefit. The three District benefit categories are further expanded upon below.
• Improved Aesthetics: The aesthetic benefit relates to the increase in the overall aesthetics as a result of the ongoing maintenance, servicing, and operation of the improvements within the District. The landscaping improvements enhance the overall image and desirability of the properties within the District. Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance, and desirability for properties within the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The overall appeal of the District is enhanced when improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal decreases when improvements are not wellmaintained, unsafe, or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community.1 With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity, and attract residents and visitors to the community.2 • Increased Safety: Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces. 3 The Victoria 1 Victoria Transport Policy Institute. (2011). Community Livability. Helping to Create Attractive, Safe, Cohesive Communities.

Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm97.htm.
2 Ibid.
3 Wolf, Kathleen L. (2010). Safe Streets – A Literature Review. In: Green Cities: Good Health (www.greenhealth.washington.edu).

College of the Environment, University of Washington.
79 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 8
Transport Policy Institute has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions can significantly reduce collisions. 4 • Economic Activity: Well maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous but can spur investment in the property. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for existing businesses, but also is a proven method for revitalizing an area and attracting new development. 5Landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business. 6 Well-maintained and safe District areas will encourage an increase in the overall pedestrian activity. The area will become more pedestrian friendly, thus improving the retail environment by encouraging individuals to shop, dine, and stay within the District boundaries. The District will provide a cleaner more inviting environment to businesses and consumers which will attract, retain and expand the retail and business climate throughout. The effort will reduce vacancy rates and increase lease rates and utilization of property within the District.

4.3 General Benefits Identified
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

General benefit is an overall and similar benefit to the public at large resulting from the maintenance of the District’s improvements provided by the assessments levied. The improvements to be maintained by the District are located within the District boundaries only. There will be no District maintenance activities provided for improvements located outside of the District boundaries.

The ongoing maintenance of the District improvements will provide aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits to the property within the District. However, it is recognized that the ongoing maintenance activities will also provide a level of benefit to some property within proximity to the District, as well as individuals passing through. Therefore, the general benefit created as a result of the District maintenance activities has been considered.

4.4 Quantification of Benefit
As a result of the maintenance and operation of the improvements, there will be a level of general benefit to people that do not work or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District’s maintenance 4 Victoria Transport Policy Institute. (2011). Community Livability. Helping to Create Attractive, Safe, Cohesive Communities.

Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm97.htm.
5 Pugliese, Philip. (2008). Complete Streets provide all the elements of multi-modal transportation. Retrieved from http://www.americantrails.org/resources/trans/completestreets08.html 6 U.S Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. (2001). Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa. dot. gov/ environment/bicycle_pedestrian/publications/sidewalk2/
80 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 9
activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District’s maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners’ assessments.

Based upon the City’s General Plan, the streets within the City are classified into one of the following categories: freeway, expressway, arterial, collector or local streets. The landscaping improvements are primarily located along N McCarthy Boulevard and Ranch Drive and situated within the public rights-ofway. The portion of the maintained landscaping that is located along N McCarthy Boulevard (classified as an arterial street) provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic.

Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips.

The landscape improvements within the District boundaries not only serve the parcels in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City’s most recent traffic study7 completed in 2016 does not identify the percentage of traffic, which is pass-through traffic, but it does provide an estimated number of daily trips for N McCarthy Boulevard at the entrance of the District.

However, the daily trip count estimate is lower than the trip count utilized in the 2015 findings report. This would not be expected with the increase in development to this area. Therefore, In the absence of a more recent reading of traffic along N. McCarthy Boulevard, the 2015 average number of daily trips of 35,050 per the General Plan has been utilized for the base trip count.

In order to account for the estimated increase in daily average trips as a result of the increased development, the City commissioned a traffic study for each new development. Per the traffic studies, it is estimated there will be an increase of 9,156 average daily trips. Adding this increase to the 35,050 previously identified above, the estimated number of average vehicles per day is 44,206 as shown below.

Street Name
Average Number of
Vehicles per Day
N McCarthy Boulevard – between SR 237 and Ranch Drive 44,206 Before the determination and allocation of the percentage of special and general benefit for the District can be made, the estimated pass-through traffic must be computed. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets for a portion of their trips, but not working, shopping or conducting business in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place.

Research consistently shows that developments with multiple land uses that make walking safe and convenient and are near other development, allow residents and workers to drive significantly less if they choose. While this District is not a mixed-use development, there are multiple land uses adjacent to one another. Therefore, treating this development area as though the uses were separated and accessible only by car would result in inflated trip counts in comparison to conventional, single-use developments.

In lieu of having a comprehensive traffic study that identifies the pass-through traffic, the estimated number of special benefit trips for each parcel has been determined using the average daily trips according 7 City of Milpitas. (2016 Traffic Study). Retrieved from City’s Assistant Traffic Engineer 81 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 10
to the ITE Trip Generation Report, 9th Edition8 and the 2010 NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-use Developments
9 .

Utilizing the ITE Trip Generation Report, each parcel within the District was assigned an average daily number of special benefit trips using the parcel’s land use, building size or number of units. Further, to ensure the number of trips generated by the parcels has not been overstated, the percentage of total trips that are made internally within the development has been considered. Using the 2010 NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments, the total special benefit trips have been reduced by approximately 31% (19,258 trips) to account for internal trips between the various businesses within the District. The total number of special benefit trips is therefore 42,864 as shown below. 8 Trip Generation, 9th Edition: An Informational Report of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2012) Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
9 Bochner, Brian S., Hooper, Kevin, Sperry, Benjamin and Dunphy, Robert. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of National Academies (2011). NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Trip Capture Estimation for MixedUse Developments. Retrieved from onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_684.pdf 82 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 11
Property Type Combined Trip Generations
Retail (ITE Land Uses 815, 820, 869) 24,978.76
Office (ITE Land Uses 710, 714, 750) 15,832.41
Industrial/Warehousing (ITE Land Uses
140, 150, 151) 8,660.43
Fast-Food Restaurant w/ drive thru (ITE
Land Use 934) 3,925.30
Gas Station (ITE Land Use 945) 3,758.16
Restaurant (ITE Land Uses 931, 932) 3,710.03
Hotel (ITE Land Use 310) 1,256.82
Total Trips 62,121.92
Internal Trip Reduction1(19,257.79)
Total Adjusted Special Benefit Trips 42,864.12
(1) The internal trip rate percentage was calculated by using the NCHRP 684 Internal Rate Capture Estimation Tool.10
The total of all special benefit trips was removed from the average number of vehicles per day traveling within the District to estimate the number of pass-through trips daily.

Street Name
Average Number
of Vehicles
per Day
Less:

Estimated Special
Benefit Trips
Estimated Number
of Pass
Through Trips
Estimated %
General
Benefit
McCarthy Blvd. 44,206 42,864 1,342 3.04%
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the landscaping improvements is estimated to be 3.04%.

Pass-thru Vehicle General Benefit 3.04%
The commonly accepted distance people will walk for public transportation, goods and services is onequarter mile.11 However, based on the location of the District, and given that it is bounded by State Route 880 and 237, and Coyote Creek, there is not an efficient or practical means of walking into the District.

Although unlikely, a person may decide to use the paths within the District, and as such the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the landscaping improvements is estimated to be 1.00%.

Pass-thru Walking General Benefit 1.00%
An estimated 1% of all US trips are made by bicycle12. Although the District is bounded by State Route 880 and 237, and Coyote Creek, there is a bike lane on N McCarthy Boulevard and a bike path along Coyote 10 Ibid.
11 Walkscore. (2014). Walk Score Methodology. Retrieved from http://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml 12 U.S Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. (2011). Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. (Report No. FHWA-PL-11-022). Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov 83 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 12
Creek13. According to the National Household Travel Surveys, 49% of bike trips are for recreation, exercise, and sports14. As result of the District maintenance activities, there will be a level of general benefit to bicycle traffic that is not associated with property in the District. As such the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the landscaping improvements is estimated to be .50%, rounded up to 1.00%.

Pass-thru Biking General Benefit 1.00%
Collective District-Wide General Benefit
Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the collective landscaping improvements, the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. The sum of the calculated general benefits is the total general benefit related to vehicle, walking, and biking pass-thru traffic. This general benefit result is provided in the table below:

Pass-thru Vehicle General Benefit 3.04%
Pass-thru Walking General Benefit 1.00%
Pass-thru Biking General Benefit 1.00%
Total General Benefit 5.04%
The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 5.04%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 95.00%. This general benefit percentage is in line with the level of general benefit determined by the assessment engineer at formation of the District (less than 10%).

4.5 Special Benefit Trips
The detailed breakdown of the estimated special benefit trips for each parcel in the District is shown in the following table.
13 City of Milpitas. (2002). General Plan. Retrieved from http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 14 Pucher, J., Buehler R., Meron, F., and Bauman, A. American Journals of Public Health, Supplement 1, Vol 101, No S1 (2011).

Walking and Cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: Evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21551387
84 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 13
Assmt ID
Assessor’s
Parcel
Number Land Use Description Acreage
Gross
Leasable
Area
Average
Trip Rate1
Estimated # of
Daily Special
Benefit Trips2
1-1A-1 022-54-016 710 - General office 1.05 8,500 11.03 93.76 1-1A-2 022-54-017(3) 310 – Hotel 3.29 83,310 8.17 680.64 1-1A-3 022-54-018(3) 310 – Hotel 2.31 70,524 8.17 576.18 1-1A-4 022-54-019 934 - Fast Food 0.19 0.00 496.12 0.00 1-1B 022-54-008 934 - Fast Food 0.78 2,912 496.12 1,444.70 1-2 022-54-002 820 - Shopping Center 0.58 5,600 42.70 239.12 1-3 022-54-003 932 - High Vol. Restaurant 1.02 5,465 127.15 694.87 1-4A 022-54-009 869 - Home Superstore 8.47 86,250 20.00 1,725.00 1-4B 022-54-012 820 - Shopping Center 3.02 15,000 42.70 640.50 1-4C 022-54-013 820 - Shopping Center 0.23 10,000 42.70 427.00 1-4D 022-54-015 931 - Quality Restaurant 1.78 8,285 89.95 745.24 1-4E 022-54-014 932 - High Vol. Restaurant 0.64 3,710 127.15 471.73 1-4F 022-54-011 820 - Shopping Center 1.31 9,100 42.70 388.57 1-4G 022-54-010 931 - Quality Restaurant 1.03 7,476 89.95 672.47 2-1 022-53-001 931 - Quality Restaurant 0.75 6,500 89.95 584.68 2-2 022-53-002 820 - Shopping Center 1.23 15,020 42.70 641.35 2-3 022-53-003 820 - Shopping Center 0.76 12,000 42.70 512.40 2-4 022-53-004 934 - Fast Food 0.6 2,000 496.12 992.24
2-5 022-53-005 934 - Fast Food 0.74 3,000 496.12 1,488.36 2-6 022-53-006 820 – Shopping Center 1.19 51,250 45.04 2,308.30 2-7 022-53-007 820 - Shopping Center 21.92 187,134 42.70 7,990.62 3 022-29-016 815 - Discount Superstore 14.56 125,000 50.75 6,343.75 4-1A-1 022-56-005 714 - Corp Headquarters 2.04 115,753 7.98 923.71 4-1A-2 022-56-006 714 - Corp Headquarters 2.06 174,483 7.98 1,392.37 4-1A-3 022-56-007 714 - Corp Headquarters 2.07 174,483 7.98 1,392.37 4-1A-4 022-56-008 Undeveloped 34.52 - - -
4-1A-5 022-56-009 Parking Lot 24.32 - - -
4-1B 022-29-037 Undeveloped 6 - - -
5-1A-1 022-29-034 750 - Office Park 36.49 572,660 11.42 6,539.78 5-2A-1 022-29-035 750 - Office Park 31.31 480,772 11.42 5,490.42 5-3A-1 022-29-040 150 – Warehousing/710
General Office

15.55 313,978 8.87 2,784.67
5-3A-2 022-29-041 931 – Quality Restaurant 0.14 6,015 89.95 541.05 5-3A-3
022-29-042 150 – Warehousing/710
General Office 6.94 136,632 8.87 1,211.79
5-3A-4
022-29-043 150 – Warehousing/710
General Office 7.36 122,208 8.87 1,083.86
5-3A-5
022-29-044 140 - Manufacturing and 710
General Office 7.73 131,331 8.87 1,164.77
5-3B-1A 022-30-054 140 - Manufacturing and 710
General Office 5.63 99,576 8.87 883.14
5-3B-2 022-30-038 Undeveloped 10 - - -
5-3B-3 022-30-039 Undeveloped 5 - - -
5-3C 022-30-0354 Pump Station 0.19 - - 1.00
5-5A-1 022-30-055 815 - Discount Superstore 5.6 74,131 50.75 3,762.15 5-5A-2 022-30-056 915 – Gasoline/Service Station 0.59 3,182 1,181.07 3,758.16 5-5A-3 022-30-057 151 – Mini-Warehouse 3.15 114,707 13.34 1,530.19 5-6 022-30-041 Open Space 0 - - -
5-7 022-30-0494Sewer Pump Station 9.12 8,500 11.03 1.00 85 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 14
Total Estimated Daily Special Benefit Trips 62,121.92
Internal Trip Reduction5(19,257.79)
Total Special Benefit Trips 42,864.12
(1) Average Trip Rate per Day is from the Institute of Traffic Engineer’s, Trip Generation Report. 15 (2) Average Number of Special Benefit Trips per Day is the Average Trip Rate times each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. (3) Average Number of Special Benefit Trips per Day is the Average Trip Rate times number of hotel rooms for this parcel. (4) Pump Station trips are an estimate.
(5) The internal trip rate percentage was calculated by using the NCHRP 684 Internal Rate Capture Estimation Tool. 16 15 Trip Generation, 9th Edition: An Informational Report of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2012) Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
16 Bochner, Brian S., Hooper, Kevin, Sperry, Benjamin and Dunphy, Robert. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of National Academies (2011). NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Trip Capture Estimation for MixedUse Developments. Retrieved from onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_684.pdf 86 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 15

5. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT

5.1 Introduction
The special benefits that accrue to the properties in the District are limited to those properties that abut an improved public street or which have been obligated by issuance of bonds for necessary public improvements (the “Benefited Parcels”). Other properties in the District receive only a general benefit from the work of the improvements, and there is also some general benefit that accrues to the community as a whole. As outlined in Section 4, the total amount of general benefit from the improvements is determined to be 5.04%.

The Benefited Parcels receive a special benefit proportionate to their net acreage and thus they are assessed on the basis of total net acreage for all costs associated with the maintenance and installation of the District’s improvements, with the following exceptions:
• Of the 9.12 acres of parcel 022-30-049 (sewer pump station), 5.51 acres is the pump station and is not assessable. The remaining 3.61 acres does not benefit from landscaping as much as other Benefited Parcels because it is dedicated to municipal sanitary sewer and storm facilities use and will not otherwise be developed. Therefore, it is assigned a special benefit equal to 50% of other Benefited Parcels.
• Parcel 022-30-035 (storm pump station) does not benefit from landscaping as much as other Benefited Parcels because it is dedicated to municipal sanitary sewer and storm facilities use and will not otherwise be developed. Therefore, it is assigned a special benefit equal to 50% of other Benefited Parcels.
• Parcel 022-29-037 and parcel 022-30-041 are dedicated to open space and therefore do not receive special benefit from the maintenance and improvements.

5.2 Method of Assessment Spread
The amount of assessment levied on each Benefited Parcel in the District, for Fiscal Year 2022/23, is $0.0349 per square foot. The assessment rate was determined by taking the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Net Amount to be assessed ($411,156) divided by the total net square footage of the District (11,792,520 sq. ft.).

The maximum assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2022/23 is approximately $0.0516, which is a preliminary number. Each year the maximum assessment rate per square foot is increased by the percentage change from April 1st of the prior year to April 1st of the current year in the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average, San Francisco-OaklandHayward. The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. For purposes of this report, the CPI increase was estimated by using the February 2022/23 CPI. 87 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 16

5.3 Maximum Assessment Rates
The following table provides the historical maximum assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2001/02 through the current fiscal year:

Fiscal Year CPI Percentage Increase(1) Assessment Rate Range (2)
2001/02 189.1 N/A $0.0120 $0.0300
2002/03 193.0 2.06% 0.0122 0.0306
2003/04 197.3 2.23% 0.0125 0.0313
2004/05 198.3 0.51% 0.0126 0.0315
2005/06 202.5 2.12% 0.0129 0.0321
2006/07 208.9 3.16% 0.0133 0.0331
2007/08 215.842 3.32% 0.0137 0.0342
2008/09 222.074 2.89% 0.0141 0.0352
2009/10 223.854 0.80% 0.0142 0.0355
2010/11 227.697 1.72% 0.0144 0.0361
2011/12 234.121 2.82% 0.0149 0.0371
2012/13 238.985 2.08% 0.0152 0.0379
2013/14 244.675 2.38% 0.0155 0.0388
2014/15 251.495 2.79% 0.0160 0.0399
2015/16 257.622 2.44% 0.0163 0.0409
2016/17 264.565 2.70% 0.0168 0.0420
2017/18 274.589 3.79% 0.0174 0.0436
2018/19 283.422 3.22% 0.0180 0.0450
2019/20 294.801 4.01% 0.0187 0.0468
2020/21 298.074 1.11% 0.0189 0.0473
2021/22 309.419 3.81% 0.0196 0.0491
2022/23 320.162 5.19%(3) 0.0207 0.0516
(1) Percentage increase from April 1 of the prior year to April 1 of the current year in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes, Pacific Cities and US City Average, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. (2) The left and right column indicate the minimum and maximum assessment rate, respectively. (3) The April 1, 2022 CPI was not available at the time of writing of this report. The Fiscal Year 2022/23 CPI increase was estimated using the February 2022/23 CPI.

5.4 Appeals
Any property owner who feels that the amount of their assessment is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of spread may file an appeal with the Finance Director of the City. Any such appeal is limited to the correction of an assessment during the current or, if before July 1, the upcoming fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Finance Director shall promptly review the information provided by the property owner and if he/she finds that the assessment should be modified, he/she shall have the authority to make the appropriate changes in the assessment roll. If any such changes are provided after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Finance Director is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction.
88 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 17

6. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following page provides a copy of the assessment diagram of the District. 89 Item # C6.
90 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
Fiscal Year 2022/23 – LLMAD 95-1 Annual Report 18

7. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessor’s parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be based on the Santa Clara County Assessor’s secured roll data for the applicable year in which this report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of assessor’s parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the Santa Clara County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount. 91 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
LLMAD No. 95-1
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN Situs Address Net Square Foot Fiscal Year 2022/23 Levy 022-29-016 301 RANCH DR 634,234 $22,113.10
022-29-034 430 N MCCARTHY BLVD 1,589,504 55,419.46
022-29-035 820 N MCCARTHY BLVD 1,363,864 47,552.28
022-29-040 407 N N MCCARTHY BLVD 677,532 23,622.74
022-29-041 507 N N MCCARTHY BLVD 43,691 1,523.30
022-29-042 607 N N MCCARTHY BLVD 302,350 10,541.68
022-29-043 707 N MCCARTHY BLVD 320,732 11,182.60
022-29-044 807 N MCCARTHY BLVD 336,545 11,733.92
022-30-035 4,138 144.28
022-30-038 435,600 15,187.56
022-30-039 1207 N MC CARTHY BLVD 217,800 7,593.78
022-30-049 78,626 2,741.36
022-30-054 907 N MCCARTHY BLVD 245,330 8,553.64
022-30-055 1645 N MCCARTHY BLVD 243,936 8,505.04
022-30-056 1605 N MCCARTHY BLVD 25,875 902.14
022-30-057 1585 N MCCARTHY BLVD 137,040 4,778.00
022-53-001 275 RANCH DR 32,670 1,139.06
022-53-002 179 RANCH DR 53,579 1,868.06
022-53-003 125 RANCH DR 33,106 1,154.26
022-53-004 81 RANCH DR 26,136 911.24
022-53-005 41 RANCH DR 32,234 1,123.88
022-53-006 63 RANCH DR 51,836 1,807.32
022-53-007 11 RANCH DR 954,835 33,291.16
022-54-002 74 RANCH DR 25,265 880.88
022-54-003 84 RANCH AVE 44,431 1,549.12
022-54-008 50 RANCH DR 33,977 1,184.62
022-54-009 120 RANCH DR 368,953 12,863.88
022-54-010 110 RANCH DR 44,867 1,564.32
022-54-011 170 RANCH DR 57,064 1,989.56
022-54-012 200 RANCH DR 131,551 4,586.64
022-54-013 212 RANCH DR 10,019 349.30
022-54-014 190 RANCH DR 27,878 972.00
022-54-015 260 RANCH DR 77,537 2,703.38
022-54-016 12 RANCH DR 46,174 1,609.88
022-54-017 30 RANCH RD 143,312 4,996.70
022-54-018 40 RANCH DR 100,624 3,508.32
022-54-019 8,276 288.56
022-56-005 115 N MCCARTHY BLVD 88,427 3,083.08
022-56-006 135 N MCCARTHY BLVD 89,734 3,128.64
022-56-007 155 N MCCARTHY BLVD 90,169 3,143.82
022-56-010 205 N MCCARTHY BLVD 1,488,719 51,905.48
022-56-011 1,074,352 37,458.20
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 2 04/11/2022 11:46:35AM92 Item # C6.

City of Milpitas
LLMAD No. 95-1
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN Situs Address Net Square Foot Fiscal Year 2022/23 Levy 42 Accounts 11,792,520 $411,156.24
11,792,520 $411,156.24 42 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 2 04/11/2022 11:46:35AM93 Item # C6.

NORTH TER CASCADITA CASCADITA TER (PVT) TER CASCADITA (PVT) CALIFORNIA 880 INTERSTATE DR RANCH BLVD McCARTHY HEATH ST INTERSTATE FWY 880 NIMITZ

REDWOOD ST ST LARCH
ELM HEATH FAIRVIEW CT CADILLAC CIR McCARTHY BLVD. COYOTE CREEK RANCH DR. LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD) 95-1 CITY OF MILPITAS (N.T.S.) 2022-2023 FISCAL YEAR LANDSCAPE AREA FUNDED FOR MAINTENANCE

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution to Approve Project Plans and Specifications, Award Construction Contract to DeSilva Gates Construction LLC for Street Resurfacing Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303; and Approve Budget Change for Project Nos. 4303 and 4298 (Staff Contact: Steve Erickson, Engineering Director/City Engineer 408-586-3301) Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to Approve Project Plans & Specifications; Award the Construction Contract to the Lowest Responsible, and Responsive Bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303; Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC; Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to Negotiate and Execute Contract Change Order(s) in an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,188,612.75 for the Project; and Approve the Budget Change to Appropriate Funding for CP 4298 and CP 4303.

Background:

Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303, Street Resurfacing Project 2022 is in the approved 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Program. The Projects provide for the design and construction of localized repair of asphalt concrete pavement, resurface asphalt concrete pavement, install Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps, repair damaged concrete sidewalk, driveways, or curb & gutter, install class II bike lanes, and reinstall pavement delineation.

Project Nos. 4283, 4298, 4303 provided funding for the design of the 2022 Street Resurfacing Projects, and the Plans and Specifications for construction are complete and now ready for City Council approval. The following streets are included in the Street Resurfacing 2022 Project and will receive pavement and concrete repairs during the summer 2022 construction season:
 Traughber Street east of N Park Victoria,
 Kennedy Drive from N Gadsden Drive to Jacklin Road,
 N Gadsden Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 N Temple Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 S Abbott Avenue south of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 Entire lengths of Michael Court, Michael Street, Brian Court, Santos Court, Prada Drive, Stemel Way, Stemel Court, Prada Court, Topham Court, Simas Drive, Ramos Court, Quail Drive, Serpa Drive, Old Evans Road, Fanyon Street, Ellis Avenue , Dennis Avenue, Carl Avenue, Braly Avenue, Adams Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Fair Hill Drive, Aran Court, View Drive, Golden Hills Drive, and Spring Valley Drive in the William Burnett Elementary School Neighborhood The Engineer’s Construction Estimate for this project was approximately $5,443,000, and the Project Plan title sheet (Attachment 1) is included in the Council’s agenda packet. The complete full-size set of plans and specifications are available for review in the office of the City Engineer. 95 Item # C7.

Analysis:

The project was advertised on March 25, 2022 in the Milpitas Post and on digital construction trade publications. Bid opening was on April 19, 2022 and 6 sealed bid proposals were received. The specifications and contract documents state that the “lowest Bid will be determined on the basis of the Total Base Bid alone unless otherwise set forth” and that the “City may choose to award the project with none or more or any combination of the alternate bid items.”
The lowest responsible and responsive bidder based on Total Base Bid alone is DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,154,451.00. The project total will be $4,754,451 with the addition of all four recommended alternative bid items.

Four alternative bid items were identified in the bid documents to be added to the project if there is available budget. Since bid proposals came in under the Engineer’s estimate, all alternative bid items are recommended to be awarded with the base bid. The alternative bid items are for additional asphalt concrete pavement repairs on various streets and locations. Residential and collector streets were chosen for repair based on their Pavement Condition Index (PCI).

DeSilva Gates’ bid submittal included an inconsequential deviation. The deviation is an omission in listing subcontractors on the Equal Opportunity Certifications Form. The City attorney has reviewed and has determined this omission is immaterial and does not impact responsiveness of the bid. No bid protests were filed with the City in regard to this project.

The City Engineers Estimate for the Project was approximately $5,443,000, and the following is a tabulation of bidders and bids received. The bid result tabulation is included as (Attachment 3).

Bidder Base Bid Alternate Bid
Items
Total Base
Bid +
Alternates
DeSilva Gates Construction LLC (Lowest) $4,154,451.00 $600,000 $4,754,451.00 Teichert Construction $4,182,515.00 $496,000 $4,678,515.00 Joseph J. Albansese, Inc $4,278,651.00 $416,000 $4,694,651.00 O’Grady Paving, Inc. $4,474,310.00 $592,000 $5,066,310.00 G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc $4,481,178.50 $336,000 $4,817,178.50 Azul Works, Inc. (Highest) $5,338,018.00 $1,036,000 $6,374,018.00 Base Bid pricing received varies between 2%-24% under the Engineer’s Estimate. The range of variation in bid pricing from the Engineer’s Estimate is likely due to the current competitive construction market due to recovery from the pandemic.

The Contractor, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, is deemed the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

Staff recommends City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment 2) to award a construction contract for the base bid including all four alternative bid items for a total contract amount of $4,754,451.

Staff recommends a construction contingency amount of $1,188,612.75 (25%) of the awarded contract amount. Typical construction contingency amounts for past street resurfacing projects are between 5% to 15%.

However, because of the recent increase in crude oil pricing and unstable world events, staff recommends the larger contingency to provide sufficient budget for the Project. The construction contingency will allow for a timely completion of the Project, while addressing the need to respond swiftly to construction conditions and approve necessary change orders in order to limit potential claims or risks to the City. Staff also recommends authorizing the Engineering Director/City Engineer to negotiate and execute any contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,188,612.75. The change order authority will not exceed this amount, and the Project would not require additional appropriation. 96 Item # C7.

Budget Change
California State Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB1 RMRA) Funding The City received an increase in the allocated amount for California State Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB1 RMRA) funds. SB1 funding received totals $3,019,103 for Project No. 4298 and 4303, and the funds will be used for transportation infrastructure. SB1 RMRA was signed into law April 2017 to address statewide transportation shortfalls. The distribution of SB1 RMRA funds to local jurisdictions for road maintenance is based on a population formula.

Measure B Funding
The City received an increase in the allocated amount for Measure B funding to be used toward this resurfacing Project. Measure B funding received totals $3,280,775. The 2016 measure B is a 30-year half-cent countywide sales tax to enhance transit, highways, expressways and active transportation. The program includes a “Local Streets and Roads” program category which includes a formula for distribution of funding to eligible cities and the County based upon city population and County road and expressway lane mileage.

The approval of a Budget Change (Attachment 4) amending the budgets for Project Nos. 4298 and 4303 to match the SB1 and Measure B allocations received is recommended. The alignment of Project budgets showing the actual grant funding received is required for use of the funding and in order to qualify all Project expenditures for reimbursement.

The following is a summary of the requested Budget Appropriations for the Project:

Project No. 4298 Current Adopted
Budget
Proposed Budget
Increase/(Decrease)
Proposed Budget Total
SB1 RMRA $1,400,000 $51,933 $1,451,933
Measure B $1,403,431 - $1,403,431
Vehicle Registration
Fee
$500,000 - $500,000
Gas Tax $1,296,569 ($968,421) $328,148
One Bay Area Grant 2 $916,488 $916,488
Total $5,516,488 ($916,488) $4,600,000
Project No. 4303 Current Adopted
Budget
Proposed Budget
Increase/(Decrease)
Proposed Budget Total
SB1 RMRA $1,500,000 $67,170 $1,567,170
Measure B $500,000 $1,377,344 $1,877,344
Vehicle Registration
Fee
$764,432 - $764,432
Gas Tax $985,568 ($894,514) $91,054
Total $3,750,000 $550,000 $4,300,000
Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1: Deny approval of project plans and specifications, award of the construction contract, of the requested budget change.

Pros: None.

Cons: A denial would cause delay in awarding this Project and in completing the needed annual repairs to the City’s pavement infrastructure and to qualify for grant reimbursement of eligible expenditures.

Reason not Recommended: A delay in the award this construction contract will delay project completion, prolong construction activities into rainy season and may potentially results in higher total construction cost, and loss of grant funding.
97 Item # C7.

Fiscal Impact:

Adequate funds are available in the budgets for Project Nos. 4283 (ADA Curb Ramp Transition Program), 4298 (Street Resurfacing Project 2020-21) and 4303 (Street Resurfacing Project 2021-22). Funding for CIP4283 comes from the Gas Tax Fund and TDA Article III. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP4283 is $910,473. Funding for CIP4298 comes from the Gas Tax Fund, Measure B, SB1 RMRA, and Vehicle Registration Fee. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP4298 is $3,170,751. Funding for CIP4303 comes from the Gas Tax Fund, Measure B, SB1 RMRA, and Vehicle Registration Fee. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP 4303 is $3,256,888, and no additional funding is required. The approval of a Budget Change (Attachment 4) amending the budgets for Project No.’s 4298 and 4303 to match the SB1 and Measure B allocations received is recommended. The alignment of Project budgets showing the actual grant funding received is required for use of the funding and in order to qualify all Project expenditures for reimbursement.

Available funding for the Project upon approval of attached resolution:

Project No. 4283 $910,473
Project No. 4298 $3,170,751
Project No. 4303 $3,256,888
Total Balance Available $7,338,112
Summary of Estimated Construction Cost:

DeSilva Gates Construction LLC $4,754,451.00
25% Contingency $1,188,612.75
Total $5,943,063.75
California Environmental Quality Act:

The project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) was filed with the County of Santa Clara on April 12, 2022.

Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve Project Plans & Specifications;

2. Award the Construction Contract to the Lowest Responsible, and Responsive Bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC., in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project 2022, Project Nos. 4283, 4298, and 4303

3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC.

4. Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to Negotiate and Execute Contract Change Order(s) in an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,188,612.75 for the Project

5. Approve the Budget Change to Appropriate Funding for CP 4298 and 4303 Attachments:

1. Plan Title Sheet

2. Resolution

3. Bid Tabulation

4. Budget Change Form
98 Item # C7.

CITY OF MILPITAS
STREET RESURFACING 2022
CITY PROJECT NO. 4283, 4298, 4303

CITY OF MILPITAS

ENGINEERING DIVISION
A
IT

INCORPORATED S
YT
I
C

CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 26, 1954

OF MILP

CITY OF SAN JOSE

CITY OF FREMONT

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

CITY OF SAN JOSE

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

COUNTY OF

COUNTY OF ALAMEDACOUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SANTA CLARA

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

CITY OF SAN JOSE

CITY OF SAN JOSE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

FANYON STREET
S. ABBOTT AVENUE

SHEET INDEX

PROJECT
LOCATION #1

TRAUGHBER STREET

VICINITY MAP
NTS
LOCATION MAP - 1
NTS

IMPROVEMENT PLANS GENERAL NOTES

PRADA DRIVE

SANTOS COURT

STEMEL WAY

PRADA COURT

TOPHAM COURT

ELLIS AVENUE

GADSDEN DRIVE

DENNIS AVENUE

CARL AVENUE

BRALY AVENUE

ADAMS AVENUE

LYNN AVENUE

FAIR HILL DRIVE

ARANA COURT
N. TEMPLE DRIVE

VIEW DRIVE

GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE

SPRING VALLEY LANE
LOCATION MAP - 2
NTS

MICHAEL COURT

MICHAEL STREET

BRIAN COURT

STEMEL COURT

SIMAS DRIVE

SERPA DRIVE

QUAIL DRIVE

RAMOS COURT

OLD EVANS ROAD

KENNEDY DRIVE

APPROXIMATE

PROJECT BOUNDARY

STREET SURFACE GENERAL NOTES

TITLE SHEET
A
IT

INCORPORATED S
YT
I
C

CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 26, 1954

OF MILP
Revisions
CivilEngineeringLandSurveying
Bellecci&Associates,inc.
7077 Koll Center Pkwy, Suite 210 Pleasanton, CA 94566
Phone (925) 681-4885 www.bellecci.com
100% SUBMITTAL
STREET RESURFACING 2022

PROJECT
LOCATION #2
FUNDED IN PART BY:
03/22/2022
3-22-2022
99 Item # C7.

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS APPROVING THE

PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE AND RESPONSIVE BIDDER, DESILVA GATES CONSTRUCTION LLC , IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,754,451.00 FOR THE STREET RESURFACING PROJECT 2022, CITY PROJECT NO. 4283, 4298 & 4303; AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH DESILVA GATES CONSTRUCTION LLC; AUTHORIZING THE ENGINEERING DIRECTOR/CITY

ENGINEER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER(S) IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,188,612.75 FOR THE PROJECT; AND APPROVE THE BUDGET CHANGE FORM TO APPROPRIATE FUNDING FOR CP 4283, 4298, AND 4303
WHEREAS, Street Resurfacing Project 2022, City Project No. 4283, 4298, 4303 (collectively referred to herein as the “Project”), which will include localized repair of asphalt concrete pavement, resurface asphalt concrete pavement, install ADA compliant curb ramps, repair damaged concrete sidewalk, repair curb & gutter, install new class II bike lanes, and reinstall pavement delineation at the following locations:
 Traughber Street east of N Park Victoria,
 Kennedy Drive from N Gadsden Drive to Jacklin Road,
 N Gadsden Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 N Temple Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 S Abbott Avenue south of E Calaveras Boulevard,
and the entirety of: Michael Court, Michael Street, Brian Court, Santos Court, Prada Drive, Stemel Way, Stemel Court, Prada Court, Topham Court, Simas Drive, Ramos Court, Quail Drive, Serpa Drive, Old Evans Road, Fanyon Street, Ellis Avenue , Dennis Avenue, Carl Avenue, Braly Avenue, Adams Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Fair Hill Drive, Aran Court, View Drive, Golden Hills Drive, and Spring Valley Drive in the William Burnett Elementary School Neighborhood
WHEREAS, the above listed locations are existing facilities pursuant to 14 CCR § 15301; and WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Estimate for the base bid Project work is $5,443,071.50; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, 6 sealed bid proposals were received. The bid pricing ranged from $4,154,451.00 to $5,338,018.00. The lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid is DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,154,451.00; and WHEREAS, the bid package included a set of add alternate items for consideration of submitted pricing after bid opening, which are all for varying quantities of localized repair of asphalt concrete pavement outside of the project limits. The City may choose to award the project with none or any combination of alternate bid items; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends adding all alternate bid items in the amount of $600,00.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, bringing the total construction contract to $4,754,451.00; and WHEREAS, no bid protest was filed with the City within five (5) days of the bid opening as set forth in the Project specifications; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds to award the Project are available in the Project budget; and 100
Item # C7.
2 Resolution No. ____
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council approve the project plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council award a construction contract to DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder for the Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project 2022, Project No. 4283, 4298 & 4303; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council authorize the Director of Engineering/City Engineer to negotiate and execute change order(s) in an amount not to exceed $1,188,612.75., twenty-five percent (25%) of the total contract value, due to the Project’s tight completion schedule and staff’s capability to respond swiftly to unanticipated construction conditions to limit potential claims or risk to the City; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council approve the budget change form to appropriate funding for CP 4298 and 4303.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council hereby approves the projects plans and specifications.

3. The City Council hereby finds the project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA guidelines because the locations of the project are currently existing facilities.

4. The City Council hereby awards the construction contract to and authorizes the City Manager to execute the contract and related documents with the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project 2022, City Project No. 4283, 4298 & 4303.

5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the construction contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC for the Project.

6. The Director of Engineering/City Engineer is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute contract change order(s) in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,188,612.75 for the Project.

7. The City Council hereby approves the budget change form to appropriate funding for CP 4283, 4298, and 4303.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of May, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:
101
Item # C7.
3 Resolution No. ____
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________ Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
102
Item # C7.

Lowest Apparrent Highest Apparent
TOTALS Average

ITEM NO ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT
TOTAL
QUANTITY Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price From
Avg
From
Eng Est
1 Mobilization (10% Maximum) LS 1 $ 550,000.00 $ 550,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 514,000.00 $ 514,000.00 $ 319,000.00 25.4% -27.3% 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 100,115.00 $ 100,115.00 $ 298,000.00 $ 298,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 280,000.00 $ 280,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 140,000.00 $ 140,000.00 $ 198,019.17 -49.4% -66.6% 3 Portable Changeable Message Signs EA 8 $ 6,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 38,400.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 2,550.00 -21.6% -66.7% 4 Neighborhood Notification LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 33,000.00 $ 33,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 13,916.67 -28.1% -33.3% 5 Water Pollution Control Program LS 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 13,121.00 $ 13,121.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 12,020.17 24.8% -57.1% 6 Monument Referencing (Incl. Pre-Construction and Post Construction) SF 90 $ 1,200.00 $ 108,000.00 $ 650.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 900.00 $ 81,000.00 $ 720.00 $ 64,800.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 99,000.00 $ 705.00 $ 63,450.00 $ 720.00 $ 64,800.00 $ 799.17 -18.7% -45.8% 7 NOT USED $ - $ - $ - $ -
8 Replace Loop Detector System EA 2 $ 7,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 15,200.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 7,560.00 $ 15,120.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 16,800.00 $ 7,426.67 -19.2% -14.3% 9 Encroachment Permits LS 1 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 3,333.33 -85.0% -88.1% 10 Adjust Sewer Manhole to Grade EA 88 $ 1,300.00 $ 114,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 88,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 88,000.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 101,200.00 $ 800.00 $ 70,400.00 $ 825.00 $ 72,600.00 $ 840.00 $ 73,920.00 $ 935.83 6.9% -23.1% 11 Adjust Drainage Manhole to Grade EA 53 $ 1,300.00 $ 68,900.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 53,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 53,000.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 60,950.00 $ 800.00 $ 42,400.00 $ 825.00 $ 43,725.00 $ 840.00 $ 44,520.00 $ 935.83 6.9% -23.1% 12 Adjust Water Valve Cover to Grade EA 112 $ 800.00 $ 89,600.00 $ 800.00 $ 89,600.00 $ 800.00 $ 89,600.00 $ 880.00 $ 98,560.00 $ 400.00 $ 44,800.00 $ 600.00 $ 67,200.00 $ 880.00 $ 98,560.00 $ 726.67 10.1% 0.0% 13 NOT USED $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
14 Adjust Monument Cover to Grade EA 90 $ 800.00 $ 72,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 72,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 72,000.00 $ 870.00 $ 78,300.00 $ 400.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 54,000.00 $ 540.00 $ 48,600.00 $ 668.33 19.7% 0.0% 15 Base Repair (3" Thick) SF 163,300 $ 5.00 $ 816,500.00 $ 4.00 $ 653,200.00 $ 3.00 $ 489,900.00 $ 3.25 $ 530,725.00 $ 4.05 $ 661,365.00 $ 3.50 $ 571,550.00 $ 4.60 $ 751,180.00 $ 3.73 7.1% -20.0% 16 Base Repair (12" Thick) SF 3,800 $ 20.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 21.00 $ 79,800.00 $ 12.00 $ 45,600.00 $ 13.00 $ 49,400.00 $ 17.00 $ 64,600.00 $ 15.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 16.33 28.6% 5.0% 17 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) Ton 14,000 $ 110.00 $ 1,540,000.00 $ 110.00 $ 1,540,000.00 $ 109.00 $ 1,526,000.00 $ 124.00 $ 1,736,000.00 $ 130.00 $ 1,820,000.00 $ 127.00 $ 1,778,000.00 $ 164.00 $ 2,296,000.00 $ 127.33 -13.6% 0.0% 18 NOT USED $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
19 Wedge Grind SF 347,100 $ 1.25 $ 433,875.00 $ 0.25 $ 86,775.00 $ 0.25 $ 86,775.00 $ 0.35 $ 121,485.00 $ 0.45 $ 156,195.00 $ 0.61 $ 211,731.00 $ 0.32 $ 111,072.00 $ 0.37 -32.7% -80.0% 20 Conform Grind SF 21,230 $ 1.50 $ 31,845.00 $ 0.70 $ 14,861.00 $ 0.30 $ 6,369.00 $ 0.70 $ 14,861.00 $ 1.00 $ 21,230.00 $ 1.00 $ 21,230.00 $ 1.20 $ 25,476.00 $ 0.82 -14.3% -53.3% 21 Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer SY 37,000 $ 3.00 $ 111,000.00 $ 2.50 $ 92,500.00 $ 2.50 $ 92,500.00 $ 2.75 $ 101,750.00 $ 2.75 $ 101,750.00 $ 2.60 $ 96,200.00 $ 4.40 $ 162,800.00 $ 2.92 -14.3% -16.7% 22 Subgrade Enhancement Geogrid SF 3,800 $ 20.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 2.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 2.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 0.80 $ 3,040.00 $ 2.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 20.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 4.00 $ 15,200.00 $ 5.13 -61.0% -90.0% 23 Remove Striping, Pavement Markings, and Pavement Markers LS 1 $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,750.00 $ 21,750.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 24,625.00 -18.8% -63.6% 24 Remove Yellow Striping (incl. lead compliance plan) LS 1 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 13,833.33 -27.7% -16.7% 25 Roadside Sign with Post (in Planting Area) EA 57 $ 550.00 $ 31,350.00 $ 300.00 $ 17,100.00 $ 300.00 $ 17,100.00 $ 325.00 $ 18,525.00 $ 325.00 $ 18,525.00 $ 310.00 $ 17,670.00 $ 520.00 $ 29,640.00 $ 346.67 -13.5% -45.5% 26 Roadside Sign with Post (in Sidewalk Area) EA 10 $ 550.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 350.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 350.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 385.00 $ 3,850.00 $ 375.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 365.00 $ 3,650.00 $ 700.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 420.83 -16.8% -36.4% 27 Traffic Line (Detail 1) LF 270 $ 1.30 $ 351.00 $ 1.00 $ 270.00 $ 1.00 $ 270.00 $ 1.00 $ 270.00 $ 2.00 $ 540.00 $ 1.30 $ 351.00 $ 1.00 $ 270.00 $ 1.22 -17.8% -23.1% 28 Traffic Line (Detail 2) LF 4,480 $ 1.40 $ 6,272.00 $ 1.00 $ 4,480.00 $ 1.00 $ 4,480.00 $ 1.00 $ 4,480.00 $ 1.10 $ 4,928.00 $ 1.30 $ 5,824.00 $ 1.00 $ 4,480.00 $ 1.07 -6.3% -28.6% 29 Traffic Line (Detail 22) LF 4,930 $ 1.60 $ 7,888.00 $ 2.00 $ 9,860.00 $ 2.00 $ 9,860.00 $ 2.50 $ 12,325.00 $ 2.40 $ 11,832.00 $ 2.50 $ 12,325.00 $ 2.80 $ 13,804.00 $ 2.37 -15.5% 25.0% 30 Traffic Line (Detail 27b) LF 3,650 $ 1.40 $ 5,110.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,650.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,650.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,650.00 $ 1.10 $ 4,015.00 $ 1.30 $ 4,745.00 $ 1.20 $ 4,380.00 $ 1.10 -9.1% -28.6% 31 Traffic Line (Detail 29) LF 70 $ 1.60 $ 112.00 $ 4.00 $ 280.00 $ 4.00 $ 280.00 $ 5.00 $ 350.00 $ 5.00 $ 350.00 $ 4.50 $ 315.00 $ 6.00 $ 420.00 $ 4.75 -15.8% 150.0% 32 Traffic Line (Detail 39) LF 3,860 $ 1.40 $ 5,404.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,860.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,860.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,860.00 $ 1.10 $ 4,246.00 $ 1.30 $ 5,018.00 $ 1.60 $ 6,176.00 $ 1.17 -14.3% -28.6% 33 Traffic Line (Detail 39a) LF 1,740 $ 1.30 $ 2,262.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,740.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,740.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,740.00 $ 1.10 $ 1,914.00 $ 1.30 $ 2,262.00 $ 1.60 $ 2,784.00 $ 1.17 -14.3% -23.1% 34 Thermoplastic Basic Crosswalk or Stop Bar (White) LF 3,610 $ 4.00 $ 14,440.00 $ 5.00 $ 18,050.00 $ 5.00 $ 18,050.00 $ 5.00 $ 18,050.00 $ 6.00 $ 21,660.00 $ 5.25 $ 18,952.50 $ 6.00 $ 21,660.00 $ 5.38 -7.0% 25.0% 35 Thermoplastic Basic Crosswalk (Yellow LF 240 $ 5.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 6.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 5.50 $ 1,320.00 $ 6.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 5.42 -7.7% 0.0% 36 Thermoplastic Ladder Crosswalk (White) SF 390 $ 6.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 6.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 5.50 $ 2,145.00 $ 6.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 5.42 -7.7% -16.7% 37 Thermoplastic Ladder Crosswalk (Yellow) SF 3,290 $ 6.00 $ 19,740.00 $ 5.00 $ 16,450.00 $ 5.00 $ 16,450.00 $ 5.00 $ 16,450.00 $ 6.00 $ 19,740.00 $ 5.50 $ 18,095.00 $ 6.80 $ 22,372.00 $ 5.55 -9.9% -16.7% 38 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF 2,330 $ 8.25 $ 19,222.50 $ 5.00 $ 11,650.00 $ 5.00 $ 11,650.00 $ 5.00 $ 11,650.00 $ 6.00 $ 13,980.00 $ 5.50 $ 12,815.00 $ 10.00 $ 23,300.00 $ 6.08 -17.8% -39.4% 39 Green Bike Lane Pavement Markings SF 1,740 $ 18.00 $ 31,320.00 $ 9.00 $ 15,660.00 $ 9.00 $ 15,660.00 $ 10.00 $ 17,400.00 $ 10.00 $ 17,400.00 $ 9.50 $ 16,530.00 $ 12.00 $ 20,880.00 $ 9.92 -9.2% -50.0% 40 Green Backed Bike Lane Pavement Markings SF 2,080 $ 18.00 $ 37,440.00 $ 10.00 $ 20,800.00 $ 10.00 $ 20,800.00 $ 11.00 $ 22,880.00 $ 11.00 $ 22,880.00 $ 10.50 $ 21,840.00 $ 14.00 $ 29,120.00 $ 11.08 -9.8% -44.4% 41 Painted Red Curb LF 2,700 $ 4.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 3.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 3.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 3.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 3.20 $ 8,640.00 $ 3.30 $ 8,910.00 $ 4.20 $ 11,340.00 $ 3.28 -8.6% -25.0% 42 Blue Reflective Raised Pavement Marker EA 58 $ 50.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,740.00 $ 35.00 $ 2,030.00 $ 28.00 $ 1,624.00 $ 28.00 -10.7% -50.0% 43 Install Curb Ramp, Case A EA 2 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 5,333.33 -6.2% -16.7% 44 Install Curb Ramp, Case B EA 2 $ 5,900.00 $ 11,800.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 4,600.00 $ 9,200.00 $ 5,350.00 -6.5% -15.3% 45 Install Curb Ramp, Case C EA 88 $ 5,800.00 $ 510,400.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 528,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 484,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 528,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 5,416.67 -7.7% -13.8% 46 Sidewalk Removal and Replacement SF 3,950 $ 20.00 $ 79,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 79,000.00 $ 17.00 $ 67,150.00 $ 21.00 $ 82,950.00 $ 19.00 $ 75,050.00 $ 19.50 $ 77,025.00 $ 14.00 $ 55,300.00 $ 18.42 8.6% 0.0% 47 Curb and Gutter Removal and Replacement (Beyond Ramp Limits) LF 570 $ 70.00 $ 39,900.00 $ 85.00 $ 48,450.00 $ 95.00 $ 54,150.00 $ 90.00 $ 51,300.00 $ 100.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 90.00 $ 51,300.00 $ 58.00 $ 33,060.00 $ 86.33 -1.5% 21.4% 48 Sewer Trench Backfill and Resoration on S. Abbott Avenue SF 150 $ 100.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 50.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 65.00 $ 9,750.00 $ 100.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 30.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 250.00 $ 37,500.00 $ 90.83 -45.0% -50.0% $ -7.4% -23.7% 4,484,853.92
1 Alternative 1: Base Repair Outside Project Limit (3" Thick) SF 8000 $ 48,000.00 6.00 $ 6.25 $ 50,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 7.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 3.50 $ 28,000.00 $ 12.00 $ 96,000.00 $ 6.79 $ -8.0% 4.2% 2 Alternative 2: Base Repair Outside Project Limit (3" Thick) SF 8000 $ 48,000.00 6.00 $ 6.25 $ 50,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 7.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 3.50 $ 28,000.00 $ 12.00 $ 96,000.00 $ 6.79 $ -8.0% 4.2% 3 Alternative 3: Base Repair Outside Project Limit (3" Thick) SF 30000 $ 150,000.00 5.00 $ 6.25 $ 187,500.00 $ 5.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 4.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 3.50 $ 105,000.00 $ 10.80 $ 324,000.00 $ 5.93 $ 5.5% 25.0% 4 Alternative 4: Base Repair Outside Project Limit (3" Thick) SF 50000 $ 5.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 6.25 $ 312,500.00 $ 5.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 4.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 6.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 3.50 $ 175,000.00 $ 10.40 $ 520,000.00 $ 5.86 6.7% 25.0% $ 3.6% 21.0% 579,333.33
Engineer's Estimate
$ 5,443,071.50
CITY OF MILPITAS STREET RESURFACING 2022
CITY PROJECT NO. 4283 & 4298 & 4303
Bid Results from 04/19/2022 Bid Opening @ 2:00pm

BID ITEMS
Total Base Bid
% Diff of Lowest
Bidder
$ 4,278,651.00 $ 4,481,178.50 4,474,310.00 $ 5,338,018.00 $ Azul Works, Inc.
$ 4,154,451.00 $ 4,182,515.00
DeSilva Gates Construction Teichert Construction Joseph J. Albanese, Inc O'Grady Paving, Inc. G. Botolotto & Company, Inc. 25% Contingency

GRAND TOTAL
$ 1,484,767.88
$ 5,943,063.75 7,423,839.38 $
$ 1,188,612.75
$ 336,000.00 592,000.00 $ 1,036,000.00 $
Total Base + All Alternatives $ 4,754,451.00 5,939,071.50 $ 4,678,515.00 $ 4,694,651.00 $ 5,066,310.00 $ 4,817,178.50 $ 6,374,018.00 $ Total Add Alternative $ 600,000.00 496,000.00 $ 496,000.00 $ 416,000.00 $ $ 1,173,662.75 1,169,628.75 $ 1,266,577.50 $ 1,204,294.63 $ 1,593,504.50 $ $ 5,868,313.75 5,848,143.75 $ 6,332,887.50 $ 6,021,473.13 $ 7,967,522.50 $ St. Francis Electric
Pacific Northwest Oil
Granite Rock Company
Pavement Engineering, Inc.

Rosas Brothers Construction
Chrisp Co
Cunha Engineering
St. Francis Electric
Pacific Northwest Oil
Magellan Construction, Inc
Graham Contractors, Inc.

Sierra Traffic Markings, Inc.

Benchmark Engineering, Inc.

St. Francis Electric
Pacific Northwest Oil
JCC
Rosas Brothers Construction
Graham Contractors, Inc.

Chrisp Co
Cunha Engineering
Mike Brown
Pacific Northwest Oil
Rosas Brothers Construction
Bond Blacktop
Chrisp Co
JCC Inc
Spencon Construction, Inc
Bond Blacktop
Chrisp Co
Kent's Oil Service DBA PNW
Pavement Recycling Systems Subcontractors Chrisp Co
Pale Horse Asphalt Engineering
Loop Detectors
Pavement Interlayer
Grinding
QC testing
JCC Inc
Rosas Brothers Construction
Bond Blacktop
Raise/Lower Utilities
Concrete
Crack Sealing
Striping
Monument Surveying
103
Item # C7.

ATTACHMENT 4
Construction Change Order Policy for Street Resurfacing Project 2022, CP 4283, 4298, and 4303 2007 City Council Approved Construction Change Order Policy Construction Award Individual Administrative Cumulative Award Amount Change Order Authority Change Order Authority Under $50,000 $5,000 $7,500
Over $50,000 10% of Award or $25,000 15% of Award or $100,000 whichever is smaller whichever is smaller
Street Resurfacing Project Street Resurfacing Project 2022, CP 4283, 4298, and 4303 Contract Award Individual Administrative Cumulative
Amount_______ Change Order Authority Change Order Authority

$4,754,451.00 N/A $1,188,612.75 (25%)
104
Item # C7.

City of Milpitas, California

BUDGET CHANGE FORM
From* To*
Type of Change
Account Amount Account Amount
Check one:

Budget Appropriation
Budget Transfer
225-2909
311-9514298153841
311-951429874800
221-3839
225-2909
311-9514303153849
311-9514303153565
311-951430374800
221-3839
$51,933
$51,933
$968,421
$968,421
$67,170
$67,170
$1,377,344
$894,514
$894,514
225-3939
311-951429874800
311-9514298153932
221-2909
225-3939
311-951430374800
311-951430374800
311-9514303153932
221-2909
$51,933
$51,933
$968,421
$968,421
$67,170
$67,170
$1,377,344
$894,514
$894,514
Adopt a Resolution to Approve Project Plans & Specifications; Award the Construction Contract to the Lowest Responsible, and Responsive Bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project No. 4283, 4298, 4303; Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC; Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to Negotiate and Execute Contract Change Order(s) in an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,188,612.75 for the Project; and Approve the Budget Change Form to Appropriate Funding for CP 4298 and CP 4303
Background:

Project No. 4283, 4298, 4303, Street Resurfacing Project 2022 is in the approved 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Program. The Project provides for the design and construction of localized repair of asphalt concrete pavement, resurface asphalt concrete pavement, install Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps, repair damaged concrete sidewalk, driveways, or curb & gutter, install class II bike lanes, and reinstall pavement delineation.

Project No’s. 4283, 4298, 4303 provided funding for the design of the 2022 Street Resurfacing Project, and the Plans and Specifications for construction are complete and now ready for City Council approval. The following streets are included in the Street Resurfacing 2022 Project and will receive pavement and concrete repairs during the summer 2022 construction season:
 Traughber Street east of N Park Victoria,
 Kennedy Drive from N Gadsden Drive to Jacklin Road,
 N Gadsden Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 N Temple Drive north of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 S Abbott Avenue south of E Calaveras Boulevard,
 Entire lengths of Michael Court, Michael Street, Brian Court, Santos Court, Prada Drive, Stemel Way, Stemel Court, Prada Court, Topham Court, Simas Drive, Ramos Court, Quail Drive, Serpa Drive, Old Evans Road, Fanyon Street, Ellis Avenue , Dennis Avenue, Carl Avenue, Braly Avenue, Adams Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Fair Hill Drive, Aran Court, View Drive, Golden Hills Drive, and Spring Valley Drive in the William Burnett Elementary School Neighborhood 105
Item # C7.

The Engineer’s Construction Estimate for this project was approximately $5,443,000, and the Project Plan title sheet (Attachment 1) is included in the Council’s agenda packet. The complete full-size set of plans and specifications are available for review in the office of the City Engineer.

Analysis:

The project was advertised on March 25, 2022 in the Milpitas Post and on digital construction trade publications. Bid opening was on April 19, 2022 and 6 sealed bid proposals were received. The specifications and contract documents state that the “lowest Bid will be determined on the basis of the Total Base Bid alone unless otherwise set forth” and that the “City may choose to award the project with none or more or any combination of the alternate bid items.”
The lowest responsible and responsive bidder based on Total Base Bid alone is DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, in the amount of $4,154,451.00. The project total will be $4,754,451 with the addition of all four recommended alternative bid items.

Four alternative bid items were identified in the bid documents to be added to the project if there is available budget. Since bid proposals came in under the Engineer’s estimate, all alternative bid items are recommended to be awarded with the base bid. The alternative bid items are for additional asphalt concrete pavement repairs on various streets and locations. Residential and collector streets were chosen for repair based on their Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and records of past complaint.

DeSilva Gates’ bid submittal included an inconsequential deviation. The deviation is an omission in listing subcontractors on the Equal Opportunity Certifications Form. The City attorney has reviewed and has determined this omission is immaterial and does not impact responsiveness of the bid. No bid protests were filed with the City in regard to this project.

The City Engineers Estimate for the Project was approximately $5,443,000, and the following is a tabulation of bidders and bids received. The bid result tabulation is included as (Attachment 3).

Bidder Base Bid Alternate Bid
Items
Total Base
Bid +
Alternates
DeSilva Gates Construction LLC (Lowest) $4,154,451.00 $600,000 $4,754,451.00 Teichert Construction $4,182,515.00 $496,000 $4,678,515.00 Joseph J. Albansese, Inc $4,278,651.00 $416,000 $4,694,651.00 O’Grady Paving, Inc. $4,474,310.00 $592,000 $5,066,310.00 G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc $4,481,178.50 $336,000 $4,817,178.50 Azul Works, Inc. (Highest) $5,338,018.00 $1,036,000 $6,374,018.00 Base Bid pricing received varies between 2%-24% under the Engineer’s Estimate. The range of variation in bid pricing from the Engineer’s Estimate is likely due to the current construction market where contractors are hungry for work due to recovery from the pandemic.

The Contractor, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC, is deemed the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

Staff recommends City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment 2) to award a construction contract for the base bid including all four alternative bid items for a total contract amount of $4,754,451.

Staff recommends a construction contingency amount of $1,188,612.75 (25%) of the awarded contract amount. Typical construction contingency amounts for past street resurfacing projects are between 5% to 15%. However, because of the recent increase in crude oil pricing and unstable world events, staff recommends the larger contingency to provide sufficient budget for the Project. The construction contingency will allow for a timely completion of the Project, while addressing the need to respond swiftly to construction conditions and approve necessary change orders in order to limit potential claims or risks to the City. Staff 106
Item # C7.
also recommends authorizing the Engineering Director/City Engineer to negotiate and execute any contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,188,612.75. The change order authority will not exceed this amount, and the Project would not require additional appropriation.

Budget Change
California State Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB1 RMRA) Funding The City received an increase in the allocated amount for California State Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB1 RMRA) funds. SB1 funding received totals $3,019,103 for Project No. 4298 and 4303, and the funds will be used for transportation infrastructure. SB1 RMRA was signed into law April 2017 to address statewide transportation shortfalls. The distribution of SB1 RMRA funds to local jurisdictions for road maintenance is based on a population formula.

Measure B Funding
The City received an increase in the allocated amount for Measure B funding to be used toward this resurfacing Project. Measure B funding received totals $3,280,775. The 2016 measure B is a 30-year halfcent countywide sales tax to enhance transit, highways, expressways and active transportation. The program includes a “Local Streets and Roads” program category which includes a formula for distribution of funding to eligible cities and the County based upon city population and County road and expressway lane mileage.

The approval of a Budget Change (Attachment 4) amending the budgets for Project No.’s 4298 and 4303 to match the SB1 and Measure B allocations received is recommended. The alignment of Project budgets showing the actual grant funding received is required for use of the funding and in order to qualify all Project expenditures for reimbursement.

The following is a summary of the requested Budget Appropriations for the Project:

Project No. 4298 Current Adopted
Budget
Proposed Budget
Increase/(Decrease)
Proposed Budget Total
SB1 RMRA $1,400,000 $51,933 $1,451,933
Measure B $1,403,431 - $1,403,431
Vehicle Registration
Fee
$500,000 - $500,000
Gas Tax $1,296,569 ($968,421) $328,148
One Bay Area Grant 2 $916,488 $916,488
Total $5,516,488 ($916,488) $4,600,000
Project No. 4303 Current Adopted
Budget
Proposed Budget
Increase/(Decrease)
Proposed Budget Total
SB1 RMRA $1,500,000 $67,170 $1,567,170
Measure B $500,000 $1,377,344 $1,877,344
Vehicle Registration
Fee
$764,432 - $764,432
Gas Tax $985,568 ($894,514) $91,054
Total $3,750,000 $550,000 $4,300,000
Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1: Deny approval of project plans and specifications, award of the construction contract, of the requested budget change.

Pros: None.
107
Item # C7.

Cons: A denial would cause delay in awarding this Project and in completing the needed annual repairs to the City’s pavement infrastructure and to qualify for grant reimbursement of eligible expenditures.

Reason not Recommended: A delay in the award this construction contract will delay project completion, prolong construction activities into rainy season and may potentially results in higher total construction cost, and loss of grant funding.

Fiscal Impact:

Adequate funds are available in the budgets for Project No.’s 4283(ADA Curb Ramp Transition Program), 4298 (Street Resurfacing Project 2020-21) and 4303 (Street Resurfacing Project 2021-22). Funding for CIP4283 comes from the Gas Tax Fund and TDA Article III. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP4283 is $910,473. Funding for CIP4298 comes from the Gas Tax Fund, Measure B, SB1 RMRA, and Vehicle Registration Fee. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP4298 is $3,170,751. Funding for CIP4303 comes from the Gas Tax Fund, Measure B, SB1 RMRA, and Vehicle Registration Fee. As of 05/03/2022, the balance in CIP 4303 is $3,256,888, and no additional funding is required. The approval of a Budget Change (Attachment 4) amending the budgets for Project No.’s 4298 and 4303 to match the SB1 and Measure B allocations received is recommended. The alignment of Project budgets showing the actual grant funding received is required for use of the funding and in order to qualify all Project expenditures for reimbursement.

Available funding for the Project upon approval of attached resolution:

Project No. 4283 $910,473
Project No. 4298 $3,170,751
Project No. 4303 $3,256,888
Total Balance Available $7,338,112
Summary of Estimated Construction Cost:

DeSilva Gates Construction LLC $4,754,451.00
25% Contingency $1,188,612.75
Total $5,943,063.75
California Environmental Quality Act:

The project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) was filed with the County of Santa Clara on April 12, 2022.

Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution to:

1. Approve Project Plans & Specifications;

2. Award the Construction Contract to the Lowest Responsible, and Responsive Bidder, DeSilva Gates Construction LLC., in the amount of $4,754,451.00 for the Street Resurfacing Project 2022, Project No.’s 4283, 4298, and 4303

3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Contract with DeSilva Gates Construction LLC.

4. Authorize the Engineering Director/City Engineer to Negotiate and Execute Contract Change Order(s) in an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,188,612.75 for the Project

5. Approve the Budget Change Form to Appropriate Funding for CP 4298 and 4303 Attachments:

Attachment 1: Plan Title Sheet
Attachment 2: Resolution
Attachment 3: Bid Tabulation
Attachment 4: Budget Change Form
Check if City Council Approval required. Meeting Date: May 17, 2022 108
Item # C7.

Requested by: Department Head: Steve Erickson Date: May 17, 2022 Reviewed by: Finance Director: Lauren Lai Date: May 17, 2022 Date approved by City Council, if required: Confirmed by:

FI/24786/V Form 30-222 (Rev. 1/92)
109
Item # C7.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Resolution Granting City Staff Enforcement Authority Regarding the Distribution of Single-use Foodware Accessories and Standard Condiments consistent with Assembly Bill 1276 (Staff Contact: Elaine Marshall, Deputy Public Works Director, 408-586-2603)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Granting City Staff Authority regarding the Distribution of Single-use Foodware Accessories and Standard Condiments consistent with Assembly Bill 1276
BACKGROUND:

On October 5, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 1276 Single-use foodware accessories and standard condiments (AB 1276). The law, effective January 1, 2022, prohibits food service establishments (including third-party food delivery platforms) from providing single-use foodware accessories (utensils, straws, etc.) and condiment packets unless requested by the customer. It expands on previous law that had placed similar requirements on single-use plastic straws. However, the new law requires that on or before June 1, 2022, the governing body of a local agency authorizes enforcement of the legislation and it specifies an enforcement process. Under the Public Resources Code enforcement process, the first and second violations shall result in a notice of violation, and any subsequent violation shall constitute an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day in violation, but not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300) annually.

ANALYSIS:

Information on the impact of this bill was included in the April 5, 2022 City Council Report for Key 2021 Approved State Laws Impacting Municipal Operations. In Santa Clara County, local jurisdictions are moving forward individually and seeking authorization from their governing bodies for local enforcement authority in order to be able to comply with the June 1st deadline. Santa Clara County cities that already have single us foodware accessory prohibition ordinances plan to amend or update their ordinances to incorporate AB 1276; other cities plan to take a resolution to their City Councils to meet the authorization requirement.

Similar to the City’s already adopted Single-Use Bag Prohibition and the Prohibition of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam Food Serviceware ordinances, staff recommends that the City’s Solid Waste program enforce AB 1276 on a complaint driven basis. This will be consistent with how the majority of jurisdictions in Santa Clara County plan to handle enforcement. Before enforcement will commence, education and outreach materials on the new requirements will be developed on a countywide level through the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission’s Technical Advisory Commission and made available for jurisdictions for local use. This outreach may include postcards to be sent to food service establishments informing them of AB 1276, flyers, posters, and fact sheets or Frequently Asked Questions. In Milpitas, staff will also work with the Office of Economic Development to raise awareness of AB 1276 requirements and will reach out to the Chamber of Commerce and other industry stakeholders.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1:

Alternative: Not authorize enforcement of AB 1276 requirements.

Pros: None.

Cons: The City of Milpitas would be out of compliance with AB 1276.

Reason not recommended: The City of Milpitas would be out of compliance with AB 1276 if it does not authorize an enforcement agency. Further, reducing single use disposable foodware and condiment containers is aligned with the draft Climate Action Plan Update and supports Measure SW1.3 Reduce Generation of Waste from Residents and Businesses, specifically Action SW-1.3.2: Encourage local businesses to reduce the use of single-use, non-biodegradable products, and support the establishment of a regional ordinance that restricts and/or limits the use of these products by local businesses.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None. The potential workload created by complaints can be absorbed by existing staff within the Solid Waste program.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

Not applicable.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution Granting City Staff Authority regarding the Distribution of Single-use Foodware Accessories and Standard Condiments consistent with Assembly Bill 1276 Attachment(s):

1. Resolution
111
Item # C8.

Resolution No. ____
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS GRANTING

CITY STAFF AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THE DISTRIBUTION OF SINGLE-USE

FOODWARE ACCESSORIES AND STANDARD CONDIMENTS CONSISTENT WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 1276
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1276 (AB 1276) into law, effective January 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, AB 1276 expands the single-use plastic straws law by prohibiting food service establishments, including third-party food delivery platforms, from handing out single-use foodware accessories such as utensils, straws, etc., and condiment packets unless requested by the customer; and WHEREAS, AB 1276 also requires that on or before June 1, 2022, a city, county, or city and county shall authorize an enforcement agency to enforce the legislation; and WHEREAS, the first and second violations of AB 1286 shall result in a notice of violation, and any subsequent violation shall constitute an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day in violation, but not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300) annually; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Milpitas that, in conformance with Assembly Bill 1276 and Section 42272 of the Public Resources Code, the City of Milpitas is hereby designated the enforcement agency of the Public Resources Code regulations of single-use foodware accessories and condiments packaged for single-use within the City of Milpitas. The City Manager shall designate the City employee(s) with the duty of enforcing Assembly Bill 1276 and California Public Resources Code Section 42272. Violation of Public Resources Code section 42272 shall be enforceable as an infraction or administrative citation, pursuant to Chapter 21 of the Milpitas Municipal Code. The first and second violations shall result in a notice of violation, and any subsequent violation shall constitute an infraction punishable by a fine of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day in violation, but not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300) annually.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
ATTEST: APPROVED:

Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
112
Item # C8.

Resolution No. ____
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
113
Item # C8.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Administrative Services Agreement and the Government Money Purchase Plan and a Trust Agreement and related documents with Mission Square Retirement for a 401A program for Unrepresented Executive Management and modify Resolution 8980, Unrepresented Employee Benefits (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086) Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting
Date:
5/17/2022
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute an Administrative Services Agreement and the Government Money Purchase Plan and a Trust Agreement and related documents with Mission Square Retirement for a 401A program for Unrepresented Executive Management and modify Resolution 8980, Unrepresented Employee Benefits Background:

The City provides a number of benefits to attract and retain employees. Assisting employees in planning for retirement is a benefit the City supports through several means including a defined benefit pension plan through the California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) and a deferred compensation plan.

Eligible City employees become members of CalPERS. The IRS considers CalPERS to be a qualifying 401(a) retirement program in that it is a retirement plan established and maintained for the employees of a state or political subdivision of the state. A 457 (b) deferred compensation plan allows employees to save and invest money (pre-tax) for retirement purposes, pre-tax. The value of an individual participant’s account is based on the contributions made and the investment performance over time. The maximum contributions limits are set in accordance with the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) limits, presently at $20,500.

For Unrepresented Employees, the City contributes $75 per month (or $900 per year) to the plan on behalf of the employees. The City’s contribution of $900 lessens the total amount of employee contribution to a maximum of $19,600 per year.

Analysis:

A 401(a) is another type of defined contribution plan allowing staff to set aside pre-tax dollars for retirement planning. Similar to a 457 plan, this defined contribution plan allows employees to choose investment options and provides some flexibility in plan design. However, because current City employees are enrolled in CalPERS which is considered a 401(a) by the IRS, establishment of a new 401(a) would require a mandatory and irrevocable election for City employees. The amount of this election can be set by the City but cannot contain any flexibility for existing City employees.

Employees in the Unrepresented Management group were surveyed and asked about preferences for the 401(a) plan design in December 2021. Additionally, an informational meeting was held in April 2022 to update employees on the survey results, review plan design concepts, and to hear and respond to employee questions and concerns. Some employees in the Unrepresented Management group expressed concerns with the new 401(a) plan. As a result of the concerns and in consideration of the varying salaries within this group, the decision is to not move forward with a 401(a) plan for the entire group at this time. 114
Item # C9.

Rather, staff recommends to establish for a subset of the Unrepresented Management group consisting of the classifications listed below and heretofore referred to as Unrepresented Executive Management group for purposes of the 401(a) plan.

Assistant City Manager
Building & Housing Director
Chief of Police
City Attorney
City Clerk
Deputy City Manager
Director of Recreation & Community Services
Economic Development Director
Engineering Director/City Engineer
Finance Director
Fire Chief
Human Resources Director
Information Technology Director
Planning Director
Public Works Director
All other existing classifications of the Unrepresented Management group not referenced above will be excluded from the plan at this time. Should the remaining members of the group and/or other employee groups express interest in forming a plan, the City will pursue the appropriate course of action.

The plan design for the 401(a) for the Unrepresented Executive Management group will be as follows:
 Allocate the City’s $75 monthly contribution from 457(b) plan into the 401(a) plan, which will allow this group to increase contributions in the 457 plan to a total of $20,500.  1% mandatory employee contribution effective with the pay period that includes July 1, 2022.  Additional 0.25% effective with the first pay period that includes July 1, to a maximum contribution of 5%.  Annual June 1 vacation cash out over maximum hours to be contributed to the plan effective 2023.  Upon termination of employment, one-half of vacation accrual value contributed to the plan, effective 2023.
 New employees entering into the group after the initial effective date, will join the plan with a 1% contribution amount, with a 0.25% increase during the pay period that includes July 1 each year thereafter, to a maximum contribution of 5%.

Regarding vacation cash-outs for the Unrepresented Management Group, employees presently have all vacation hours in excess of 260 hours (336 hours for Police) cashed out each June. In addition, employees are given an option to cash out up to 80 hours of future vacation accruals by electing to do so in December of each year. In order to preserve this benefit versus mandatory contributions to the 401(a) plan benefit, effective December 2022, Unrepresented Executive Management employees may elect to cash out any hours above 260 or up to 80 hours of accrued vacation hours each calendar year, whichever is greater.

Should the City decide to alter plan terms for the 401(a) plan in the future, it may do so via resolution based on future Council action.

Currently, Mission Square Retirement (formerly ICMA Retirement Corporation) administers the City’s 457 Plan.

Therefore, staff recommends that Mission Square Retirement administers the 401(a) Plan and authorize the City Manager to execute two contracts (1) Administrative Service Agreement and (2) Governmental Money Purchase Plan & Trust Adoption Agreement and related documents. It is important to note that program administration costs are charged to the participants and are not a cost to the City. Further, no other benefits for unrepresented executive management group are recommended to be changed. 115
Item # C9.

Policy Alternative:

Alternative: Do not establish a 401(a) deferred plan.

Pros: The City will save time on creating a new 401(a) plan.

Cons: Without the establishment of the 401(a) plan, City employees will not have the option to increase pre-tax savings for retirement, and the City may be less competitive in attracting talent.

Reason for Not Recommending: Through internal engagement, Unrepresented Executive Management employees expressed interest in the City offering another pre-tax defined contribution retirement savings plan.

Fiscal Impact:

There is not fiscal impact to this item. The City’s contribution of $75 per month / $900 per year have been budgeted in FY22 budget as well as FY23 budget. The plan administration fee is paid by employee participants. Likewise, the mutual fund fees are also paid by employee participants.

California Environmental Quality Act:

Approval of the item is not a Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) as it involves organizational or administrative activities of a local government entity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Further, it is also exempt under CEQA Guideline 15301 as the operation of an existing facility with no expansion of use.

Recommendation:

Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Administrative Services Agreement and the Government Money Purchase Plan and Trust Agreement and related documents with Mission Square Retirement for a 401(a) program for the Unrepresented Executive Management group and modify Resolution 8980, Unrepresented Employee Benefits.

Attachment:

1. Resolution to modify Resolution 8980 Unrepresented Employee Benefits. 116
Item # C9.

RESOLUTION NO. XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS AMENDING THE

CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO AUTHORIZE FRINGE BENEFITS FOR UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT

EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas Unrepresented Management Employees are not organized or represented for the purposes of meeting and conferring with the City in the areas of salary, benefits, and working conditions; and WHEREAS; on December 17, 1968, the City of Milpitas established a Classification Plan adopted as Resolution No. 1626, which has been amended from time to time and which is in accordance with the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the City of Milpitas (Resolution No. 792, as amended); and WHEREAS, amendments to the Classification Plan are necessary to account for changes within the organization, including transfer of duties, new job responsibilities, and adjustments to salary ranges and fringe benefits; and WHEREAS, on July 7, 1981, the City Council of the City of Milpitas adopted Resolution No. 3558 to authorize compensation and fringe benefits for all exempt employees and City Council; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2020, the City Council amended the fringe benefits for Unrepresented Management Employees; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the fringe benefits for Unrepresented Executive Management Employees as set out herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council hereby authorizes the revised fringe benefits listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, for Unrepresented Management Employees.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of May 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________________ ___________________________ Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
117
Item # C9.

BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE
MERIT INCREASES Employees are eligible for merit-based salary increases annually, provided they are not at the maximum of their compensation range. The City manager will have the authority to recommend the amount of the merit increase.

All
HEALTH PLANS The City provides CalPERS medical coverage. City paid premium is capped at the Kaiser rates for each level of coverage. Only active employees who have eligible dependents enrolled in the plan are eligible for City-paid premium above the single plan rate.

All
HEALTH PLAN WAIVER Employees who are covered as an eligible dependent under another health insurance plan may waive health converge and receive a total of $250 per month in lieu of medical plan coverage with appropriate documentation. (no change since 1999) All
LIFE INSURANCE $50,000 for full-time employees All
City provides a plan similar to State Disability Insurance Miscellaneous Police: Covered under the MPOA Trust Fund Police Captains Only Fire: None (See Family Leave provision) Fire
After the first 60 days, coverage at 60% of base salary up to $1,500 per month.

Additional buy-up options are available.

Miscellaneous
Coverage for Police is provided through California Law Enforcement Association (CLEA). Police Coverage for Fire is provided through California Association of Professional Firefighters (CAPFF).

Fire
DENTAL--Misc and Fire City provides a self-funded Delta Dental plan with graduated benefits based on years of service, including preventative, routine, major, and orthodontia.

Miscellaneous and Fire
DENTAL--Police City provides Delta Dental coverage. Police VISION City provides a vision plan for eye examination, lenses and frames. All TRUST FUND $50 per month contribution into the MPOA Trust Fund for spousal/dependent coverage and Short Term Disability coverage
Police Captains Only
DEFERRED COMPENSATION--SECTION 457
PLAN
City provides $900 per year toward deferred compensation (no change since 1999), with contributions being pro-rated per pay period (approximately $34.62 per pay period).

Employees are eligible to voluntarily participate in the plan.

Unrepresented Management
Staff
DEFERRED COMPENSATION--SECTION 457
PLAN
City provides $900 per year toward deferred compensation (no change since 1999), with contributions being pro-rated per period (approximately $34.62 per pay period).

Effective with the establishment of the 401A plan, the City's contribution will be moved to the 401A plan. Employees are eligible to voluntarily participate in the plan.

Unrepresented Executive
Staff
*401A Effective May 17, 2022, the City Council authorizes the City Manager to establish a 401A plan with employee contributions. The 401A plan shall be established with a 1% mandatory employee contribution effective July 1, 2022, increasing each July thereafter by 0.25%; effective Jan 2023, shall require the value of vacation accruals over 260 hours to be put into the plan and shall require one-half of terminal vacation pay to be put into the plan. New employees entering in the plan will require 1% mandatory contribution increasing by 0.25% each July 1 to a maximum of 5%.

Unrepresented Executive
Staff
*VEBA Discuss future options. A voluntary employees' beneficiary association (VEBA) is a form of trust fund permitted under United States federal tax law, whose sole purpose must be to provide employee benefits. Discuss future options.

TBD
FLEXIBLE SPENDING PLAN City offers employees who wish to participate a pre-tax deduction for an IRS Section 125 plan for medical expenses, premiums; child or elder care expenses; or traffic and vanpooling.

All
MISCELLANEOUS EXEMPT CLASSIFICATIONS:

UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE STAFF - Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, Building and Housing Director, Economic Development Director, Engineering Director “City Engineer”, Director of Finance, Human Resources Director, Information Services Director, Planning Director, Public Works Director, and Recreation and Community Services Director
UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT STAFF - Assistant Director of Finance, Building Official, CIP Manager, Community Services Engagement and Inclusion Administrator, Deputy Public Works Director, Employee Relations Officer, Finance Manager, Housing and Neighborhood Services Administrator, Planning Manager, Plan Review Manager, Police Support Services Manager, Public Information Officer, Public Works Manager, and Transportation and Traffic Manager POLICE EXEMPT CLASSIFICATIONS:

UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE STAFF - Police Chief UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT STAFF - Assistant Police Chief and Police Captain FIRE EXEMPT CLASSIFICATIONS:

UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE STAFF - Fire Chief UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT STAFF - Deputy Fire Chief, Chief Fire Enforcement Officer and Assistant Fire Marshal

EXHIBIT A

UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT

BENEFITS PACKAGE
Effective July 1, 2022

SHORT TERM DISABILITY

LONG TERM DISABILITY
Version date 5/11/2022
118
Item # C9.

BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE
City offered plan: 10 visits for Miscellaneous employees. Miscellaneous City offered plan: 15 visits for Safety employees. Police & Fire VACATION LEAVE ACCRUALS 40 hour employees: Years of Service Yearly Accruals 1-4 16 Days
5-9 21 Days
10-14 26 Days
15-19 31 Days
20 + 36 Days
Maximum number of hours that can be carried over is 260 hours for 40 hour employees.

Accruals in excess of maximum will be cashed out at the end of the pay period including June 1.

Unrepresented Management
Maximum number of hours that can be carried over is 260 hours. Accruals in excess of the maximum will be cashed out effective the end of the pay period including June 1.

Starting in 2023, accruals in excess of the meaximum will be moved into the 401A plan effective the end of the pay period including June 1.

Unrepresented Executive
Staff
336 hours for Police Management employees. Hours over maximum will be cashed out at the end of the pay period including June 1.

Police
City Manager may authorize approval to carry over vacation hours in excess of the maximum
Unrepresented Management

VACATION CASH-OUT PER IRS CONSTRUCTIVE

RECEIPT
Unrepresented Employees may elect to cash out up to 80 hours of accrued vacation hours each calendar year.

Unrepresented Management

VACATION CASH-OUT PER IRS CONSTRUCTIVE

RECEIPT
Unrepresented Executive Employees may elect to cash out any hours above 260 or up to 80 hours of accrued vacation hours each calendar year, whichever is greater.

Unrepresented Executive
Staff
VACATION ACCRUAL Accrual tier will be based on total years of public service. All VACATION USE No minimum waiting period for use of accrued vacation. All MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PAID (MIP) LEAVE Eligible employees will accrue 5 hours of Management Incentive Paid Leave (MIP) for each full pay period worked. Maximum carryover is 260 hours. Hours cannot be cashed out during employment, or at separation.

Executive Staff Only and 2nd
in charge including: Assistant
Finance Director, Employee
Relations Officer, Building
Official, Community Services
Engagement and Inclusion
Administrator, Deputy Public
Works Director, Planning
Manager, Public Information
Officer, Deputy Fire Chief,
MANAGEMENT LEAVE Eligible employees will receive 40 hours of Management Leave added to their Floating Holiday Bank on the pay period following December 31. Employees appointed mid-year will receive pro-rated amount based on date of hire/promotion. Hours can be taken in any increment. There is no annual carryover and hours cannot be cashed out during employment, or at separation. An additional 40 hours of Management Leave can be earned with Department Head recommendation and City Manager approval upon annual evaluation for past performance.

Unrepresented Staff Only
(Staff that receive MIP are
not eligible for Management
Leave)
SICK LEAVE ACCRUALS 12 work days per year. 8 hours = 1 work day All Employees hired prior to July 18, 1999, with 5 years of service, separating in "good standing" as determined by the City Manager may elect to cash in sick leave using this formula: 2.5% x Yrs. of Service x highest hourly rate x sick leave hours accrued.

Miscellaneous
Employees hired after January 1, 1995, with 5 years of service, separating in "good standing" as determined by the City Manager may use this formula:

After 4th year: .25%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 9th year: .50%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 14th year: .75%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 19th year: 1.0%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave Employees hired after July 18, 1999, with 5 years of service, separating in "good standing" as determined by the City Manager may use this formula: After 4th year: .25%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 9th year: .50%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 14th year: .75%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 19th year: 1.0%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave

EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP)
SICK LEAVE PAY-OFF--Separating Employees
(Not Retiring)
Fire
Police

VACATION CARRYOVER RATE
All
Version date 5/11/2022
119
Item # C9.

BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE
In January, an employee with 5 years of service may elect sick leave cash-out in accordance with the terms in Sick Leave Pay-Off above.

Fire
For employees hired on or before 7/17/99, each November, an employee with 5 or more years of service may elect to cash out accrued sick leave. Payout shall be in accordance with appropriate pay out formulas. The maximum annual amount shall not exceed 50% of employees sick leave balance. Employees eligible for this benefit shall at all times maintain a sick leave balance of at least 240 hours .

Miscellaneous & Police
HOLIDAYS The City observes 12 holidays:

January 1 (New Years), Third Monday in January (Dr. Martin Luther King's Birthday), Third Monday in February (Washington's Birthday), March 31, Cesar Chavez Day, Last Monday in May (Memorial Day), July 4, First Monday in September (Labor Day), November 11 (Veterans Day), Thanksgiving Day, Day After Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day.

All
FLOATING HOLIDAY Each calendar year 8 hours of floating holiday to be used by December 31 of each year otherwise it will be lost.

All
FITNESS PROGRAM Offers employees free access to City-sponsored sports and fitness programs. All TUITION & TRAINING City provides reimbursement for education up to $3,000 per year. Work related training costs including transportation and lodging expenses.

All
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Use of personal vehicle for City business will be reimbursed at the IRS established rate.

Not eligible for Mileage Reimbursement if receiving a car allowance.

All
CAR ALLOWANCE $550 per month Unrepresented Executive
Staff Only

2.7% at 55 Retirement Plan including the final year compensation amendment for those employed before 10/9/2011. (Employee pays 8% contribution rate).

Miscellaneous
Tier 2 (Classic): 2% at 60 Retirement Plan including the final three-year compensation average for those Classic employees hired on or after 10/9/2011. (Employee pays 7% contribution rate).

Miscellaneous
Tier 3 (PEPRA): 2% at 62 Retirement Plan including the final three-year average compensation for employees hired on or after 01/01/2013. (Employee contribution rate as stated in CalPERS actuarial report).

Miscellaneous

3.0% at 50 Plan, The 1959 Survivors Benefit in full force and effect. (Fire pays 12%; Police pays 9%).

Police & Fire
Tier 2 (Classic): 3.0% at 55 Plan, Effective 4/8/2012. Including three-year compensation average; The 1959 Survivors Benefit in full force and effect. (Police pays 9%; Fire pays 12%).

Police & Fire
Tier 3 (PEPRA): 2.7% at 57 Plan, Effective 1/1/2013. Including three-year compensation average; The 1959 Survivors Benefit in full force and effect. (Employee contribution rate as stated in CalPERS actuarial report).

Police & Fire
Military Service Buy-back (GC 21024) All
PERS Credit for Unused Sick Leave (GC 20965) All
Death Benefit (GC 21620) All
Prior Service Credit ( GC20055) All
1959 Survivor's Benefit (GC21573) All
EYEGLASS REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement up to $175 per fiscal year for eyeglasses and $200 for bifocals when prescribed by a physician for use at a video display terminal provided the glasses are not covered by health or vision plan first.

All
SAFETY EQUIPMENT The City shall furnish appropriate safety equipment, the employee shall maintain in good order, and is the City's property.

Fire
$1,000 per year for 40 hour employees plus one pair of safety shoes every 2 years. Fire $1,350 per year for 40 hour employees. Police
Up to 80 hours of sick leave to care for a family member including: mother, father, spouse, registered domestic partner, brother, sister, son/daughter, grandparents, or domestic partner, whether the immediate family member is of the employee's or spouse's family, including step or adopted relatives. It also includes concurrent use of sick leave accruals for self or other accruals for eligible family members under FMLA or CRFA.

All
Fire personnel may use 14 days of accrued sick leave (without medical note) for birth or adoption of a child.

Fire

CALPERS RETIREMENT

PERS ENHANCEMENTS

UNIFORM ALLOWANCE

FAMILY LEAVE

SICK LEAVE CASH OUT

PER IRS CONSTRUCTIVE RECEIPT
Version date 5/11/2022
120
Item # C9.

BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE
Fire Unrep may use available sick leave for family medical purposes including same members as above. The use of family leave shall be limited to 80 hours per calendar year. Family medical purposes shall mean illness, accident, medical appointments or other related occurrences. Fire Unrep may take up to four months unpaid family or medical leave within a 24 month period, unless they qualifiy for FMLA/CFRA and this benefit is greater, for the following:

Birth, adoption, or serious illness of a child; self, parent, spouse, or registered domestic partner of an employee.

City will provide benefit coverage for up to 4 months and employee may elect to continue benefits at his/her own expense for up to an additional 18 months.

Available leave balances must be exhausted first prior to leave without pay.

COMPASSIONATE LEAVE City provides up to 40 hours of paid leave in the event of the death of an eligible family member (same family members as in Family Leave).

All
MILITARY LEAVE Paid military leave is provided for active and temporary duty in accordance with City policy and provisions of the State and Federal Laws.

All
JURY LEAVE City provides paid time upon jury summons if called to duty. All LEAVE OF ABSENCE An unpaid personal leave of absence is available upon approval of the City Manager. All FMLA/CFRA Employees may take up to 12 weeks paid/unpaid family or medical leave under Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) or California Family Rights Act (CFRA) within a 12 month period for the following: birth or adoption; serious illness of a child, self, parent or spouse; or baby bonding. Employee must exhaust available leave balances to qualify for leave without pay. Benefits will be covered during FMLA/CFRA leave.

All
First 80 hours of lost work time is covered at 100% pay; next 240 hours at 80% pay. All Sworn Police and Fire employees are eligible for up to one year paid workers' compensation leave per labor code 4850.

Sworn Police and Fire
MEDICARE Both City and employee contribute, if hired after March 31, 1986. All SEVERANCE PAY If employee is terminated for reasons other than "for cause" employee would be eligible for up to 16 weeks of salary plus benefits, depending on date of hire. For additional details, see Muni Code section VI-3-4.00 - Severance Payments for Specified At-Will Positions.

All

RETIREMENT BENEFITS
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligibility for retiree benefits is predicated upon retirement from CalPERS Retirement System.

All
Upon retirement, disability retirement, or death, for those employees who were hired on or before 7/17/99, and who had at least 5 years of service, the City shall pay retiree or estate for unused accrued sick leave using this formula: 2.5% x years of service x highest hourly rate x sick leave hours.

Miscellaneous and Police
Upon retirement, disability retirement, or death, for those employees who were hired on or before 1/1/95, and who had at least 5 years of service, the City shall pay retiree or estate for unused accrued sick leave using this formula: 2.5% x years of service x highest hourly rate x sick leave hours.

Fire
Employees hired after January 1, 1995, with 5 years of service, separating in "good standing" as determined by the City Manager may use this formula:

After 4th year: .25%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 9th year: .50%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 14th year: .75%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 19th year: 1.0%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave Employees hired after July 18, 1999, with 5 years of service, separating in "good standing" as determined by the City Manager may use this formula:

After 4th year: .25%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 9th year: .50%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 14th year: .75%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave After 19th year: 1.0%/year x hourly rate x accrued sick leave SICK LEAVE CREDIT Upon retiring with PERS, all employees shall be eligible for the PERS Credit for Unused Sick Leave provision (20965). Employees hired prior to July 17, 1999 may choose a cash out or Credit for Unused Sick Leave.

All
RETIREMENT MEDICAL COVERAGE See Retiree Benefit Grid All

SICK LEAVE CASH-OUT
FAMILY LEAVE (continued)

WORKERS COMPENSATION
Fire
Fire
Police
Version date 5/11/2022
121
Item # C9.

BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE
DISABILITY RETIREMENT For Medical Coverage: employees on disability retirement who had at least 5 years of fulltime or equivalent service with the City and retired after June 30, 2003, the City agrees to contribute up to "the retiree cap amount" or until the retiree is re-employed.

Police
Benefits may be continued at the retiree's expense 50% of City's Premium. Miscellaneous and Fire Benefits may be continued at the retiree's expense. Police RETIREE VISION Benefits may be continued at the retiree's expense. All 1% of payroll plus benefits contributed to a specific fund to assist in paying for spousal/dependent medical premiums for each of the following groups: Miscellaneous Unrep, Police Unrep and Fire Unrep. If fund is depleted, reimbursement will end for FY.

See Dependent Benefits Grid
SAFETY EQUIPMENT Upon retirement, the city shall give a command officer his/her service weapon and holsters without charge if either (1) the Milpitas Police Chief endorses an identification certificate approving the officer carrying a concealed and loaded firearm or (2) a hearing board determines that, under Penal Code section 12027.1, at the time the officer retired from the Milpitas Police Department, the employee had a right to a certificate permitting the carrying of a concealed and loaded firearm.

Police

RETIREE DENTAL
RETIREE SPOUSAL/ DEPENDENT MEDICAL PLAN All
Version date 5/11/2022
122
Item # C9.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Granting an Easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Grant of Easement, and Any and All Necessary Documents, in a Form Approved by the City Attorney, for the Access to Operate, Inspect, Maintain, Repair, and Reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and Appurtenant Structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution granting an easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Grant of Easement, and any and all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the access to operate, inspect, maintain, repair, and reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station.

Background:

Gibraltar Water Pump Station, located at 641 Gibraltar Court, is a City of Milpitas facility that includes wholesale water turnouts from the City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC”) and Santa Clara Valley Water District (“Valley Water”), potable water storage, the City’s central pumping system, and the operations center for the City’s potable water distribution system. Valley Water owns and operates a 42-inch treated water transmission line with appurtenances (“Milpitas Pipeline”), along the west side of the property, which supplies potable water to the City at the Gibraltar Station. The Milpitas Pipeline also provides water to and receives water from SFPUC’s 42-inch treated water transmission line with appurtenances (“Intertie”) at the Gibraltar Station to serve the City and other water retailers. Valley Water requests a nonexclusive easement for ingress/egress and water pipelines to enter upon and utilize a portion of the property for purposes of operating and maintaining the Milpitas Pipeline and the Intertie and appurtenances upon, over, and across that certain real property in the City of Milpitas.

Analysis:

The proposed Grant Deed for easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District is a standard practice when Valley Water operated and maintained pipelines are on property not owned by Valley Water. The easement allows Valley Water to access and maintain the pipeline in perpetuity.

The attached exhibit (Attachment 2 – Exhibit B) shows the location of the proposed easement to be granted to Valley Water. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving the granting of an easement to Valley Water and to authorize the City Manager to execute the Grant Deed and related property documents subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Policy Alternative:

Alternative: Do not adopt resolution and not authorize the City Manager to execute the easement agreement.

Pros: None.

Cons: Valley Water will not be able to access Gibraltar Water Pump Station to operate, inspect, maintain, repair and reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures without City permission. 123
Item # C10.

Reason not Recommended: Not adopting the resolution would require City staff to provide access 24/7 upon request from Valley Water to facilitate ongoing water supply to our residents and businesses.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

California Environmental Quality Act:

The Project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of CEQA guidelines.

Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution granting an easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Grant of Easement, and any and all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the access to operate, inspect, maintain, repair, and reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station.

Attachment:

1. Resolution

2. Valley Water Easement Exhibit
124
Item # C10.

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS GRANTING AN

EASEMENT TO SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE ACCESS TO

OPERATE, INSPECT, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, AND RECONSTRUCT THE MILPITAS PIPELINE, THE INTERTIE, and APPURTENANT STRUCTURES AT GIBRALTAR WATER

PUMP STATION
WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas owns the property located at 641 Gibraltar Court (“Property”), the site of Gibraltar Pump Station and Reservoirs, a facility that includes wholesale water supply turnouts from the City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC”) and Valley Water, potable water storage, the City’s central pumping system, and the operations center for the City’s potable water distribution system; and
WHEREAS, Valley Water owns and operates a 42-inch treated water transmission line with appurtenances (“Milpitas Pipeline”), along the west side of the Property which pipeline supplies potable water to the City at Gibraltar Station; and
WHEREAS, the Milpitas Pipeline also provides water to and receives water from SFPUC’s 42- inch treated water transmission line with appurtenances (“Intertie”) at the Gibraltar Station to serve the City and other water retailers; and
WHEREAS, SFPUC owns and, jointly with Valley Water, operates and maintains the Intertie; and WHEREAS, Valley Water requests a nonexclusive easement for ingress/egress and water pipelines to enter upon a portion of the Property for purposes of operating and maintaining the Milpitas Pipeline and the Intertie and appurtenances upon, over, and across that certain real property in the City of Milpitas, County of Santa Clara, State of California; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience require a grant of the nonexclusive easement requested by Valley Water; and
WHEREAS, the easement grant deed and all necessary property related documents will be approved as to form by the City Attorney. Staff recommends the City Council to adopt a resolution to grant an easement to Valley Water and authorize the City Manager to execute an easement agreement to allow Valley Water access to operate, inspect, maintain, repair, and reconstruct Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council does hereby approve and grant an easement to Santa Clara Valley Water District and authorize the City Manager to execute the easement agreement for the access to operate, inspect, maintain, repair, and reconstruct the Milpitas Pipeline, the Intertie, and appurtenant structures at Gibraltar Water Pump Station. 125
Item # C10.
2 Resolution No. ____
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________ Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
126
Item # C10.
127
Item # C10.
128
Item # C10.
129
Item # C10.
130
Item # C10.
131
Item # C10.
132
Item # C10.
133
Item # C10.
134
Item # C10.
135
Item # C10.
136
Item # C10.
137
Item # C10.
138
Item # C10.
139
Item # C10.
140
Item # C10.
141
Item # C10.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Review the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022 (Staff Contact: Lauren Lai, Finance Director, 408-586-3111) Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Review the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022
BACKGROUND:

On June 1, 2021, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Adopted Operating Budget in the amount of $195.2 million and the General Fund Budget in the amount of $110.8 million. After adoption of the budget, staff monitors revenues and expenditures for all funds with an emphasis on the General Fund and Enterprise Funds.

ANALYSIS:

This staff report provides a quarterly update on budget versus actual revenues and expenditures of the General, Water and Sewer Funds, the City’s major operating funds. The summary information below as well as the attachments comprise the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. Major revenue sources and expenditures for these funds are discussed below. The attachments provide a more detailed summary of budget versus actual revenues and expenditures for the third quarter of FY 2021-22 as well as prior year actual for comparison purposes.

General Fund
On June 1, 2021, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Adopted Operating General Fund Budget in the amount of $110.8 million. As of March 31, 2022, the City received $67.8 million in revenues, or

60.0% of the FY21-22 amended revenue budget and incurred $60.3 million in expenditures, or 53.2% of the FY21-22 amended operating budget. Revenues and expenditures are seasonal with cash flow fluctuations due to timing of revenue receipts and City serves rendered. As such, actual percentage of revenues may not match the lapsed time period of the quarterly report (i.e. 28.6% of revenue versus 50% for 6-month time period).

Revenues
As mentioned above, the nine months ending March 31, 2022, the General Fund has received $67.8 million, or

60.0% of the FY 2021-22 amended revenue budget of $112.9 million. The amended revenue budget represents $110.8 million adopted budget, $1.6 million budget amendments and $0.5 million carryover of grants. Overall, General Fund revenues are 0.6% greater than last year at the same time. The FY 2021-22 adopted budget did assume a higher, recovering revenue, which is discussed further below by major categories.
142
Item # C11.

General Fund
Revenues by Categories
Amended
Budget
Receipt
03/31/2022
Outstanding
%
Receipt
FY21
Receipt
03/31/2021
Property Tax $41,269,917 $21,950,943 $19,318,974 53.2% $20,652,913 Sales and Use Tax 26,635,511 16,996,188 9,639,323 63.8% 13,306,245 Sales and Use Tax - Measure F 6,308,250 3,487,826 2,820,424 55.3% 0 Licenses, Permits & Fines 9,915,764 8,213,498 1,702,266 82.8% 6,536,183 Transient Occupancy Tax 7,470,087 4,212,946 3,257,141 56.4% 2,517,786 Operating Transfer In 6,852,931 3,144,698 3,708,233 45.9% 13,875,148 Franchise Fees 5,298,656 2,296,517 3,002,139 43.3% 2,195,851 Charges for Services 4,685,068 3,625,046 1,060,022 77.4% 2,921,849 Intergovernmental 2,793,899 2,202,713 591,186 78.8% 3,061,355 Other Taxes 1,023,421 1,023,597 (176) 100.0% 759,576
Use of Money and Property 300,000 277,585 22,415 92.5% 759,350 Other Revenues 388,200 378,235 9,965 97.4% 795,374
Grand Total $112,941,704 $67,809,794 $45,131,910 60.0% $67,381,630  Property Taxes and Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund: For the nine months ending March 31, 2022, $22.0 million, or 53.2%, of the $41.3 million budget has been received. The revenue forecast estimates $41.3 million in total property tax revenue for the City of Milpitas based on the County of Santa Clara (County) projections. Compared to the County’s most recent update on February 11, 2022, the County’s property tax projections are net $1.4 million higher than the adopted budget of $41.3 million. However, such variance primarily relates to ERAF allocation, which the County cautions to assume ongoing in municipal budgeting due to pending litigation.  Sales & Use Tax: Sales tax is usually collected one quarter in arrears. As of March 31, 2022, the City has received seven months of sales tax receipt. Revenues are 28% higher than last year at the same time primarily due to higher consumption and inflation. HdL estimates Sales & Use tax revenue at approximately $0.25 million higher than the adopted budget.  Sales & Use Tax – Measure F: The district tax became operative April 1, 2021 and sunsets in eight years. Sales tax is usually collected one quarter in arrears. As of March 31, 2022, the City has received seven months of sales tax receipt. HdL estimates Measure F revenue at approximately $6.2 million.
 Franchise Fees: Franchise fees are typically received a month in arrears. Sanitation franchise fees attributed to September have not yet been received. Revenues are 5% higher compared to last year at the same time. While the revenue is trending higher than last year, business operations are not yet at pre-pandemic level. Further, the franchise fees from PG&E are received annually in the final quarter of the fiscal year.
 Hotel/Motel (TOT) Tax: Revenues are 67% higher than last year at the same time primarily due to easing of COVID-19 restrictions. However, current projections show the TOT may not reach budgeted assumption of 50% pre-pandemic revenue level.
 License and Permits: For the nine months ending March 31, 2022, $8.2 million, or 82.8%, of the $10.3 million amended budget has been received. Revenues are 25.7% higher than last year at the same time.
 Charges for Services: Revenues are 24.1% higher than last year at the same time, especially in building and planning divisions. COVID-19 restrictions have gradually eased compared to prior year, which suffered shelter-in-place restrictions. 143
Item # C11.
 Use of Money and Property: Revenues are 63.4% lower than last year at the same time due to lower invested cash balance. Per Council direction, in June 2020, staff transferred $33.9 million of General Fund CalPERS reserve to establish the Section 115 Pension Trust, which is recorded in an Internal Service Fund.
 Intergovernmental: Prior year, the Federal government provided a one-time COVID CARES funding.  Operating Transfer In: Prior year, the General Fund received one-time interfund transfers from TASP and General Government CIP due to the COVID budget deficit.

Expenditures
For the nine months ending March 31, 2022, the General Fund has utilized $84.0 million, or 73.1%, of the FY 21-22 amended operating budget of $114.9 million. The amended operating budget represents $110.8 million of the adopted appropriation, $2.1 million of carryover encumbrances, $0.4 million carryover grants as well as $1.6 million of increased department appropriations as approved by Council during the first through third quarter of the fiscal year. As of March 31, 2022, expenditures are trending 1.0% lower than last year primarily due to lower encumbrances of contractual services. Staff will continue to monitor expenditures relative to Council authorized appropriations.

Staff would like to highlight the following items that are anomalies and/or current trends.  Due to vacancies, Police Department expenditure is trending 2.7% lower compared to last year.  City Attorney’s Office expenditures are 92.8% of amended budget due to encumbrances of the annual contracts in the first three quarters.
 Finance reflects pending year-end interfund cost allocation yet to be posted in Q4.  Fire Department is experiencing higher than anticipated overtime costs due to backfilling positions with staff on medical leave, workers’ compensation and/or academy training.

General Fund
Expenditures by
Departments
Amended
Budget
Total YTD
Expenditure
Including
Encumbrance
% of
Amended
Budget
FY21 YTD
Expenditure
Including
Encumbrance
Building Safety & Housing $5,606,357 3,709,918 66.2% 4,308,354 City Attorney 1,029,100 955,251 92.8% 790,261
City Clerk 561,288 367,511 65.5% 463,881
City Council 555,938 289,257 52.0% 287,755
City Manager 2,066,711 1,471,415 71.2% 1,549,628
Economic Development 917,428 663,775 72.4% 610,583
Engineering 3,702,361 2,598,648 70.2% 2,917,053
Finance 4,280,884 3,337,328 78.0% 3,293,104
Fire 27,802,774 21,912,280 78.8% 21,576,472
Human Resources 1,851,857 1,247,369 67.4% 1,466,087
Information Technology 3,606,476 2,592,817 71.9% 2,561,244 Non-Departmental 11,149,257 6,606,697 59.3% 6,246,582
Planning 2,116,914 1,351,710 63.9% 1,660,018
Police 34,949,391 25,615,862 73.3% 26,323,138
Public Works 9,153,442 7,256,447 79.3% 7,744,525
Recreation & Community
Services 5,223,330 3,712,120 71.1% 2,597,675
Transfers Out 340,590 340,590 100.0% 300,000
Grand Total 114,914,098 84,028,994 73.1% 84,696,360
144
Item # C11.

Grants and Donations
In accordance with City Council approved Budget Guidelines, the City Manager has the authority to accept grants and donations up to $100k or less. Staff is reporting on these accepted grants and donations in the second quarter.

Grants:

1. Santa Clara County Emergency Medical Services Grant for FY21-22 appropriated to Fire Department - $38,887
Donations:

1. Walmart Community Grant for FY21-22 appropriated to Police Department - $2,500 Unanticipated Expenditure Reserve
In accordance with the City Council approved Budget Guidelines, as part of the quarterly financial status reports, Staff is reporting on the use of the Unanticipated Expenditure Reserve for the each respective quarter.

Table 1: Unanticipated Expenditure Reserve Uses
Description Amount
CPS HR Consulting Implicit Bias Training 8,786
Additional Cleaning Services and Supplies (COVID Related) 2,353 Legal Services (Best, Best and Krieger, COVID Related) 1,133 Emergency Operations Center (EOC, COVID Related) 531
AG Witt Services related to FEMA COVID Claims 28,369
Windsor Street Fence Installation 61,440
Harvard Kennedy School Executive Education, Senior Executives in State and Local Government Program*
16,900
Sound Wall Repair 41,150
TOTAL for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022 $ 160,662
* per the City Manager’s Employment Agreement
Water Maintenance & Operation (M&O) Fund Financial Status Revenues: For the nine months ended March 31, 2022, $23.0 million of charges for services, or 73.7%, of the $31.1 million budgeted has been received. Total revenue received amounts to $23.1 million, or 73.2%, of the $31.5 million budgeted.

Expenditures: For the nine months ended March 31, 2022, $26.0 million, or 91.1%, of the $28.6 million amended budgeted has been spent. Wholesale water purchase for the entire fiscal year is encumbered in the first quarter.

Sewer Maintenance & Operation (M&O) Fund Financial Status Revenues: For the nine months ended March 31, 2022, $16.0 million of charges for services, or 77.4%, of the $20.7 million budgeted has been received. Total revenue received amounts to $16.0 million, or 76.6%, of the $20.9 million budgeted.

Expenditures: For the nine months ended March 31, 2022, $13.1 million, or 72.7%, of the $18.0 million amended budgeted has been spent.
145
Item # C11.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to receive this informational report. It is intended to provide a financial update of the City’s General, Water and Sewer funds for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. No budget amendment is recommended.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

The action being considered has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).

RECOMMENDATION:

Review the FY 2021-22 Quarterly Financial Status Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2022 Attachment(s):

1. FY 2021-22 Revenue Report for Fiscal Year-To-Date March 31, 2022

2. FY 2021-22 General Fund Expenditures by Department March 31, 2022

3. FY 2021-22 Water and Sewer Funds Financial Status for Fiscal Year-To-Date March 31, 2022 146
Item # C11.

Revenue Categories Adopted Budget Amendments Grants C/O Amended Budget Receipt Outstanding % Receipt Receipt
3/31/2021
% Receipt
3/31/2021
Charges for Services 31,143,569 0 0 31,143,569 22,965,769 8,177,800 73.7% 23,466,022 75.2% Intergovernmental 0 0 0 0 588 (588) 9667 0.0%
Licenses, Permits & Fines 0 0 0 0 (78,725) 78,725 0 0.0% Other Revenues 17,601 0 0 17,601 4,311 13,290 24.5% 0 0.0% Use of Money and Property 372,000 0 0 372,000 203,351 168,649 54.7% 187,382 39.6% Grand Total 31,533,170 0 0 31,533,170 23,095,293 8,437,877 73.2% 23,663,071 74.1% Expenditures by Department Adopted Budget Amendments Grants C/O Encumb. C/O Amended
Budget Expenditure Encumbrance Total YTD Exp.
% of Amended
Budget
Total YTD Exp.
03/31/2021
% of Amended
Budget 3/31/2021
City Attorney 7,071 0 0 0 7,071 4,805 7,266 12,071 170.7% 0 0.0% City Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 0.0%
Engineering 0 0 0 29,500 29,500 29,500 0 29,500 100.0% 100,000 149.3% Finance 1,014,844 0 0 24,652 1,039,496 609,183 54,421 663,604 63.8% 639,905 61.3% Non-Departmental 20,571,485 6,498 0 47,461 20,625,444 12,638,916 7,543,439 20,182,355 97.9% 19,176,978 97.0% Public Works 4,141,441 0 0 159,266 4,300,707 3,039,832 187,184 3,227,016 75.0% 4,110,845 86.7% Transfers In/Out/Revenue 2,571,407 0 0 0 2,571,407 1,928,555 0 1,928,555 75.0% 0 0.0% Grand Total 28,306,248 6,498 0 260,879 28,573,625 18,250,790 7,792,311 26,043,101 91.1% 24,027,909 93.8% Revenue Categories Adopted Budget Amendments Grants C/O Amended Budget Receipt Outstanding % Receipt Receipt
3/31/2021
% Receipt
3/31/2021
Charges for Services 20,657,555 0 0 20,657,555 15,986,817 4,670,738 77.4% 14,642,921 70.8% Intergovernmental 0 0 0 0 588 (588) 9667 0.0%
Licenses, Permits & Fines 0 0 0 0 (54,075) 54,075 0 0.0% Operating Transfer In 11 0 0 11 11 0 100.0% 0 0.0%
Use of Money and Property 251,000 0 0 251,000 92,639 158,361 36.9% 122,595 60.7% Grand Total 20,908,566 0 0 20,908,566 16,025,979 4,882,587 76.6% 14,775,183 70.7% Expenditures by Department Adopted Budget Amendments Grants C/O Encumb. C/O Amended
Budget Expenditure Encumbrance Total YTD Exp.
% of Amended
Budget
Total YTD Exp.
3/31/2021
% of Amended
Budget 3/31/2021
City Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 0.0%
Engineering 0 0 0 25,500 25,500 14,500 11,000 25,500 100.0% 100,000 149.3% Finance 586,262 0 0 24,652 610,914 393,395 54,421 447,816 73.3% 421,180 65.8% Non-Departmental 10,251,498 368,411 0 1,812,133 12,432,042 5,925,089 3,598,318 9,523,408 76.6% 10,218,405 79.5% Public Works 2,762,327 484,000 0 172,429 3,418,756 1,747,697 212,477 1,960,175 57.3% 2,060,926 67.3% Transfers In/Out/Revenue 1,482,966 0 0 0 1,482,966 1,112,225 0 1,112,225 75.0% 0 0.0% Grand Total 15,083,053 852,411 0 2,034,714 17,970,178 9,192,906 3,876,217 13,069,123 72.7% 12,800,692 77.0% City of Milpitas
Water and Sewer Financial Status
For Fiscal Year-To-Date March 31, 2022
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
147
Item # C11.

FY22 FY22 FY22 FY22 FY22 FY22 FY22 FY21 Percentage
Adopted Amended Revenue Revenue Percentage Revenue
Increase
(Decrease)
Budget
Budget
Amendments
Grant
Carryover Budget As of 03/31/22 Outstanding
of Amended
Budget as of 03/31/21 FY22 / FY21
Property Tax $ - 41,269,917 $ - $ 41,269,917 $ 21,950,943 $ 19,318,974 $ 53.2% 20,652,913 $ 6% Sales and Use Tax 25,633,000 1,002,511 0 26,635,511 16,996,188 9,639,323 63.8% 13,306,245 28% Sales and Use Tax - Measure F 6,308,250 0 0 6,308,250 3,487,826 2,820,424 55.3% 0 Licenses, Permits & Fines 10,276,817 (361,053) 0 9,915,764 8,213,498 1,702,266 82.8% 6,536,183 26% Transient Occupancy Tax 7,713,639 (243,552) 0 7,470,087 4,212,946 3,257,141 56.4% 2,517,786 67% Operating Transfer In 6,552,931 300,000 0 6,852,931 3,144,698 3,708,233 45.9% 13,875,148 -77% Franchise Fees 5,751,133 (452,477) 0 5,298,656 2,296,517 3,002,139 43.3% 2,195,851 5% Charges for Services 4,225,969 459,099 0 4,685,068 3,625,046 1,060,022 77.4% 2,921,849 24% Intergovernmental 1,154,571 1,119,147 520,181 2,793,899 2,202,713 591,186 78.8% 3,061,355 -28% Other Taxes 1,023,421 - 0 1,023,421 1,023,597 (176) 100.0% 759,576 35% Use of Money and Property 500,000 (200,000) 0 300,000 277,585 22,415 92.5% 759,350 -63% Other Revenues 370,000 18,200 0 388,200 378,235 9,965 97.4% 795,374 -52% Total General Fund Revenue $ 1,641,875 110,779,648 $ 520,181 $ 112,941,704 $ 67,809,794 $ 45,131,910 $ 60.0% 67,381,630 $ 0.6% General Fund Revenues

CITY OF MILPITAS
General Fund Revenues
For Fiscal Year-To-Date March 31, 2022
148
Item # C11.

Departments
Adopted
Budget Amendments Grants C/O Encumb. C/O
Amended
Budget Expenditure Encumbrance Total YTD Exp.
% of
Amended
Budget
FY21 YTD
Expenditure
Including
Encumbrance
% of Amended
FY21 Budget
Building Safety & Housing 5,833,755 -305,067 0 77,669 5,606,357 3,421,479 288,438 3,709,918 66.2% 4,308,354 75.9% City Attorney 1,029,100 0 0 0 1,029,100 639,789 315,462 955,251 92.8% 790,261 58.4% City Clerk 570,791 -9,503 0 0 561,288 367,511 0 367,511 65.5% 463,881 77.4% City Council 549,474 -55,450 0 61,914 555,938 238,324 50,933 289,257 52.0% 287,755 64.4% City Manager 2,062,856 -24,120 0 27,975 2,066,711 1,440,440 30,975 1,471,415 71.2% 1,549,628 66.9% Economic Development 895,807 -19,879 0 41,500 917,428 622,275 41,500 663,775 72.4% 610,583 66.7% Engineering 3,740,281 -44,716 0 6,796 3,702,361 2,534,042 64,606 2,598,648 70.2% 2,917,053 76.4% Finance 4,180,126 11,500 0 89,258 4,280,884 3,112,743 224,585 3,337,328 78.0% 3,293,104 76.9% Fire 26,592,973 1,146,305 0 63,496 27,802,774 21,775,352 136,927 21,912,280 78.8% 21,576,472 76.6% Human Resources 1,865,271 -103,297 0 89,883 1,851,857 1,120,672 126,696 1,247,369 67.4% 1,466,087 68.8% Information Technology 3,659,100 -100,826 0 48,202 3,606,476 2,408,289 184,528 2,592,817 71.9% 2,561,244 71.6% Non-Departmental 8,016,549 2,586,665 0 546,043 11,149,257 6,146,489 460,208 6,606,697 59.3% 6,246,582 63.5% Planning 1,712,346 -87,293 323,774 168,087 2,116,914 1,298,792 52,918 1,351,710 63.9% 1,660,018 66.7% Police 35,606,905 -1,005,866 17,885 330,467 34,949,391 25,389,891 225,970 25,615,862 73.3% 26,323,138 75.8% Public Works 8,789,060 -210,421 0 574,803 9,153,442 6,332,269 924,177 7,256,447 79.3% 7,744,525 82.3% Recreation & Community Services 5,334,672 -137,023 12,968 12,713 5,223,330 3,433,075 279,045 3,712,120 71.1% 2,597,675 60.3% Transfers In/Out/Revenue 340,590 0 0 0 340,590 340,590 0 340,590 100.0% 300,000 100.0% Grand Total 110,779,656 1,641,009 354,627 2,138,806 114,914,098 80,622,024 3,406,970 84,028,994 73.1% 84,696,360 74.1% City of Milpitas
General Fund Expenditure By Department Financial Status For Fiscal Year-To-Date March 31, 2022
149
Item # C11.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Local 1699 modifying the eligible participants for the Retiree Dependent Medical Fund (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086) Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Local 1699 modifying the eligible participants for the Retiree Dependent Medical Fund.

Background:

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters requires the City to contribute 1% of the cost of payroll with benefits to a fund to be used to help pay the medical premiums of dependents of eligible retirees, and dependents of eligible employees who became deceased while still employed. When employees promote to a Fire Unrepresented Management position, their dependents are no longer eligible to participate in the IAFF, Local 1699 Retiree Dependent Health Care Fund nor are their paid contributions portable. Although the Unrepresented Fire Management group has a similar program, the number of participants in the group is small and the amount of funds available for retireedependent medical expenses is limited.

Prior to the creation of the Unrepresented Fire Management Retiree Medical Fund, the IAFF Fund had allowed dependents of promoted IAFF employees to participate in the IAFF, Local 1699 fund. The plan was modified to exclude those employees in 2007.

The IAFF desires to modify the plan to allow prior members who were promoted out of the bargaining unit, the ability to have their dependents participate in the plan.

Analysis:

The Fire Department has a history of filling vacancies from within which provides upward mobility to employees and plays a key role in succession planning. It is a practice that helps develop and retain the talent pipeline to enable them to fill vacant leadership roles. As one promotes, there is an expectation for a continuation or increase in benefits associated with the assumption of higher duties associated with the new position.

The current design of the Retiree Dependent Medical Funds disincentives promoting outside of the bargaining for fear of an inadequate dependent retiree medical plan. The pool of contributors to the Unrepresented Fire Fund is small resulting in a small amount of funds to support the retirees in that group. The IAFF is willing to expand the ability for dependents of promoted employees to have access to the IAFF fund, providing greater stability to these retirees.

Policy Alternative:

Alternative: Maintain the existing Plan Document.

Pros: Maintains existing plan.
150
Item # C12.

Cons: Not allowing promoted employees the ability to participate in the IAFF, Local 1699 Fund, will continue a disincentive of people promoting outside of the bargaining unit and will continue instability in the availability of funds available to reimburse retirees for dependent medical costs.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City has negotiated in good faith with the Union and an agreement has been reached on plan amendments.

Fiscal Impact:

There are no additional costs associated with the change to this program.

California Environmental Quality Act:

Approval of the recommendation is not an activity defined as a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b) (3) and 15378(b)(4) either because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and/or because the action is financial and/or administrative and does not directly impact the environment.

Recommendation:

Authorize the City Manager to amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Local 1699 modifying the eligible participants for the Retiree Dependent Medical Fund.

Attachment:

1. Plan Fund Agreement between City and IAFF, Local 1699 151
Item # C12.

CITY OF MILPITAS PREMIUM PAYMENT PLAN

FOR SPOUSES, REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERS, AND DEPENDENTS OF MILPITAS FIREFIGHTERS UNION, LOCAL 1699 RETIREES
The Milpitas Firefighters Union, Local 1699 ("Local"), and the City of Milpitas (the "City") have established the Retiree Dependent Health Care Fund (the "Fund") to provide payment towards dependent premiums for coverage under certain medical plans offered by the City to retired employees of the City who have been represented by Local and who retired on or after February 21, 2007. The City will use this City of Milpitas Premium Payment Plan for Spouses, Registered Domestic Partners, and Dependents of Retirees (the "Plan") to administer the Fund.

The Plan is intended to be a governmental plan that is exempt from the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS

1.1 "Agreement" means the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the City of Milpitas and Firefighters Union, Local 1699 with the effective date of July 1, 2005, and any extensions, amendments, modifications, or renewals of the agreements, or any successor agreements which provide for participation in the Fund. "Dependent" means a spouse, registered domestic partner, child, adopted child, or any other dependent covered by a medical plan offered by the City of a Local retiree. Dependent is specifically defined to cover the following individuals:
(a) the individual to whom an employee is legally married both at the time of the Employee's Retirement and at the time Premiums are provided; · an individual who is the bonafide registered domestic partner of an Employee both at the time of the Employee's Retirement and at the time Premiums are provided, so long as the domestic partner qualifies as a dependent under a City offered health plan that provides coverage for retirees and is chosen by the Retiree;
(b) an individual who is the biological or adopted child of the Employee and who is the Employee's dependent under the Rules and Regulations of the CalPERS Health Program Handbook both at the time of the Employee's Retirement and at the time Premiums are provided.

1.2 "City" means the City of Milpitas.

1.3 "Employee" means each individual included in the employee unit (Local) as described in the Agreement.

1.4 "Fund" means a segregated account for contributions under this Plan and earnings thereon. The Fund will be held by the City from which Premiums and expenses under the Plan are paid.

1.5 "Local" means the Milpitas Firefighters Union, Local 1699

1.6 "Plan" means the City of Milpitas Premium Payment Plan for Spouses, Registered Domestic Partners, and Dependents of Retirees.

1.7 "Premiums" means the medical premium amounts payable toward Retiree Dependent Premiums for coverage under a medical plan offered by the City that provides coverage for Retirees' dependents. The amount of Premiums with respect to a Dependent will be 152
Item # C12.
determined in accordance with the terms of the medical plan in which the Retiree participates. "Premiums" will not include payment for coverage under a health or other welfare plan that is not provided by the City.

1.8 "Registered Domestic Partner" means an individual who is in a committed same-sex relationship with a Retiree or in a committed opposite-sex relationship with a Retiree where one partner is 62 years or older who have registered with the California Secretary of State as domestic partners under the California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003, also known as AB 205 Goldberg, and who possess a Certificate of Registered Domestic Partnership from the California Secretary of State.

1.9 "Retiree" means an Employee who has five or more years of full-time or equivalent service with the City and who is covered by one of the City's medical plans on the date of his or her Retirement. Prior to being entitled to contributions toward medical coverage from the Fund, a Retiree must submit the appropriate application to the City.

1.10 "Retirement" means an Employee's completion of active service with the City (a) immediately followed by his or her receipt of pension benefits from the California Public Employees Retirement System ("PERS") or (b) later followed by receipt of pension benefits from PERS to which a separating City employee was eligible following completion of active service with the City but which the former Employee chose to defer receipt of until a later point in time.

ARTICLE II - PURPOSE OF THE PLAN

2.1 The Fund has been established for the sole purpose of providing contributions toward medical premiums of Retirees' Dependents. Neither the City, Local, any Employee, any Retiree nor any other person shall have any right, title, or interest in the Fund other than as specifically provided in this Plan and the Agreement. The Fund shall not be liable for or subject to the debts, contracts, or liabilities of the City, Local, or any Employee, Retiree or Dependent. No Premiums payable under the Plan shall be subject to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or charge by any person.

2.2 Neither the City nor any officer, agent, or employee of the City shall be under any liability to the Fund, except to the extent that contributions are required to be made to the Fund. The City has no obligation to pay any Premiums with respect to any individual to the extent that the assets held in the Fund are insufficient to pay such Premiums.

2.3 Neither the Local nor any Employee, Retiree, or Dependent shall be liable or responsible for any debts, liabilities, or obligations of the Fund.

ARTICLE III - ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT FOR RETIREE AND DEPENDENT(S)

3.1 Retiree Eligibility - An employee who has five or more years of full-time or equivalent service with the City and who is covered by one of the City's medical plans on the date of his or her Retirement. Prior to being entitled to contributions. toward medical coverage from the Fund, a Retiree must submit the appropriate application to the City.

3.2 To be an eligible "Dependent", the Retiree must have had the dependent enrolled for dependent coverage under one of the City's medical plans at the time of the Employee's 153
Item # C12.

Retirement.

ARTICLE IV - TERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY

4.1 A dependent shall cease to be eligible for plan benefits upon the earliest date of the following occurrences:
(a) The date the plan is terminated, or
(b) The death of the dependent: or
(c) The death of the Retiree (Upon the death of the retiree, the City will only be responsible for the CalPERS Administrative Fee for any continued dependent · coverage); or
(d) In the case of a spouse whose marriage with the retiree dissolves, the date the marital status ends, if the retiree remarries the new spouse will not be eligible for the fund; or
(e) In the case of dependents of eligible employees who became deceased while still employed, if the spouse remarries or acquires benefits from other sources; or
(f) An individual no longer satisfies the definition of dependent or no longer satisfies the specific eligibility requirements for a dependent.

ARTICLE V - CITY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND

5.1 The City shall make contributions to the Fund in the amount set forth in the Agreement.

The City shall hold and account for contributions to the Fund as a sub fund in City’s General Fund. The sub fund consists of assets held by the City acting as agent for individual organizations, for other government units, or for other funds of the City.

5.2 Contributions to the Fund shall be due and payable in accord with the Agreement between the Local and the City.

ARTICLE VI - PREMIUMS

6.1 At or after the date of a Retiree's Retirement, the Retiree shall be entitled to up to 100% of the dependent portion of the Retiree's health premium for coverage under a medical plan offered by the City that provides coverage for Retirees paid from the Fund as long as the Retiree's dependent qualifies under Section 1.2. If a Retiree and/or the Retiree's Dependent fails to make timely payments required of him or her under the applicable medical plan, this Plan, or the Agreement, the Retiree and Dependent shall no longer be eligible to have premiums paid from the Fund. An employee who terminates employment with the City without satisfying the requirements for Retirement or a deferred Retirement shall not be entitled to have Dependent Premiums paid from the Fund.

6.2 As set forth in the Agreement, Premiums payable from the Fund with respect to a dependent shall be a percentage of the incremental cost of having spouse or family coverage, rather than retiree-only coverage, under a medical plan made available by the 154
Item # C12.

City to retired Employees. The applicable percentage to which a Dependent is entitled is established in the Agreement between the City and the Local. The current applicable percentage is set forth in Appendix A.
(a) The City will reimburse the Retiree's dependent(s) portion of the health premium from the Fund according to Appendix A. The reimbursement will be based on the difference of the single premium rate and the two-party premium rate or family premium rate depending on the retiree's status. For example: A retiree is eligible for 25% family premium rate reimbursement from the Retiree Dependent Health Care Fund: the monthly Family premium rate is $1,258.95, the monthly single premium rate is $484.21, the difference is $774.74. The reimbursement of 25% of the difference equals $193.69.

6.3 A Retiree will not be entitled to have Premiums paid if neither the Dependent nor the Retiree is legally responsible for payment for coverage under the plan of the City in which the Retiree participates or if the Dependent or the Retiree is entitled to payment for such coverage from a third party.

6.4 If a Dependent is eligible for coverage (including individual, spouse, registered domestic partner, or dependent coverage) under another medical plan, the payment of Premiums on behalf of the Dependent shall be secondary or supplemental to said coverage.

6.5 If the City anticipates at any time that the assets of the Fund will be depleted before all Premium payments are made in any fiscal year (July 1 to June 30), the City may propose a reduction in Premium payments (and an increase in payments for which the Retiree would then be responsible). If the City and Local agree on a reduction in Premium payments, that reduction will be effective for the remainder of that fiscal year, or until another such reduction is agreed to. If no such reduction is proposed and agreed to, payment of all Premiums from the Fund will stop if, at any time, the assets of the Fund would be insufficient to reimburse Premiums for all Dependents on the next payment date for such Premiums.

6.6 Payment of Premiums will be made directly to the provider of medical coverage for the Retiree and Dependent unless the provider requires that payment be withheld from a Retiree's monthly pension payment. In that case, the City will reimburse the Retiree for the amount of the Premiums to which the Retiree is entitled under the Plan.

ARTICLE VIII - ADMINISTRATION

7.1 The Plan shall be administered by the City, whose power and authority shall include, but not be limited to:
(a) to pay Retiree Dependent Premiums from the Fund;
(b) to compromise, settle, or release claims or demands in favor of or against the Fund or the City on such terms and conditions as the City may deem desirable subject to the requirements of the Agreement and this Plan; (c) to adopt rules and regulations for the administration of the Fund which are not inconsistent with the terms of the Agreement and this Plan; (d) to adopt appropriate investment policies or guidelines; and (e) to invest the assets held in the Fund in the City's "pooled investment portfolio 155
Item # C12.
and to allocate to the Fund a pro-rata share of the portfolio's monthly earnings and losses. The "pooled investment portfolio" consists of assets held by the City that are combined for investment purposes.

7.2 The City shall maintain or have maintained suitable and adequate records for the administration of the Fund. The City may require any Employee, Retiree or Dependent to submit information reasonably relevant to the Fund's administration and shall require an appropriate application of the same general type as is attached as Appendix B. If requested by Local on or between July 1 and August 31, the City shall provide Local no later than October 15 with an accounting of the amounts contributed by the City to the Fund, the amounts in the Fund, and the amounts paid out as contributions from the Fund toward Dependent Premiums during the twelve (12) months preceding July 1 of that year. In addition, upon reasonable request in writing from Local, the City will permit a certified public accountant retained and paid by the Local to examine, at a time or times agreed to by the City and Local, such public books, records, papers, or reports of the City as may be necessary to determine whether the City is making full and prompt payment of all sums required to be paid by it to and from the Plan.

7.3 The duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the City under the Plan shall be determined solely by the express provisions of this Plan and the Agreement, and no further duties, responsibilities or liabilities shall be implied or imposed.

7.4 In the event any question or dispute shall arise as to the proper person or persons to whom any payments shall be made under the Plan, the City may withhold payment pending adjudication or resolution of the question or dispute, satisfactory to the City, or until the City has been fully protected against loss by means of such indemnification agreement or bond as the City, in its sole judgment, determines to be adequate.

ARTICLE VIII - GENERAL PROVISIONS

8.1 The rights and duties of all parties, including the City, Local, Retirees and Dependents shall be governed by the provisions of the Agreement and this Plan.

8.2 No Retiree or Dependent shall have any right or claim to contributions toward Premiums from the Fund except as specified herein. The City has established and maintains a "Continuation of Health Benefits Form" concerning claims for contributions toward Premiums.

8.3 If any provision of this Plan, the rules and regulations made pursuant thereto, or any step in the administration of the Fund is held to be illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of the Plan unless the illegality or invalidity prevents, or in substantial degree unfavorably affectsthe accomplishment of the objectives and purposes of the Fund.

8.4 Except as required under federal or state law (including the California Public Records Act) or to the extent necessary for the proper administration of the Plan, or as otherwise specified in the Plan, all books, records, papers, reports, documents, or other information obtained with respect to the Fund or the Plan shall be confidential and shall not be made public or used for any other purpose than the administration of the Plan. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the preparation and publication of statistical data and summary reports with respect to the operations of the Plan.
156
Item # C12.

ARTICLE IX - TERMINATION OF THE FUND

9.1 The provisions of the Plan may be amended or modified from time to time by the City, subject to any collective bargaining obligation, if applicable.

9.2 If, after satisfying any collective bargaining obligation(s) to Local the City will no longer be contributing to the Fund, all assets remaining in the Fund that are attributable to contributions under this Plan will be used, after all administrative expenses attributable to the Plan are paid, for the benefit of Employees and Retirees in a manner determined by the City and Local.

Dated: _______________________ Dated: _______________________ IAFF Representative: City Representatives:

Jon Powers, President, IAFF Steven G. McHarris, City Manager Jeannine Seher, Human Resources Director
May 12, 2022
157
Item # C12.

APPENDIX A

PREMIUM PAYMENT AMOUNTS

RETIREE DEPENDENT HEALTH CARE FUND
As set forth in the Agreement in effect as of April 1, 2022, payments from the Retiree Dependent Health Care Fund (the "Fund") of Retiree Dependent Premiums will be a percentage of the full cost of the Retiree's health premium for such coverage, as set forth below:

1. The City will contribute 1% of payroll with benefits to a fund to be used to help pay the medical premiums of dependents of eligible retirees, and dependents of eligible employees who became deceased while still employed. The City's annual 1% of payroll with benefits contribution shall be recalculated each fiscal year based on the applicable payroll as of the last full pay period in June. The City will annually deposit this amount in the Fund by the end of August.

2. City's Financial Obligation Limited to 1%. In no case will the City be required to place funds in the Fund above the 1% of payroll and benefits as specified in the Agreement.

3. Contributions from the Fund Toward Retiree Dependent Premiums:

Contributions from the Fund toward the medical premiums covering dependents of retirees and eligible surviving dependents of deceased employees shall be limited as follows:
• 100% for permanent IAFF employees hired prior to January 1, 1995, and retired or deceased while employed on or February 21, 2007, who have at least ten (10) years of full-time or equivalent service with the City of Milpitas.
• 50% for permanent IAFF employees hired prior to January 1, 1995, and retired or deceased while employed on or after February 21, 2007, who have at least five (5), but less than ten (10) years of full-time or equivalent service with the City of Milpitas.
• For permanent IAFF employees hired on or after January 1, 1995, and retired or deceased while employed on or after February 21, 2007, who have at least five (5) years of full-time or equivalent service with the City of Milpitas:
(i) 25% for retirees with less than nine (9) years of service; (ii) 50% for retirees upon completion of nine full (9) years of service; (iii) 75% for retirees upon completion of fourteen full (14) years of service;
(iv) 100% for retirees upon completion of nineteen full (19) years of service.

4. Local 1699 members that promote to management positions within the Milpitas Fire Department on or after February 21, 2007 shall carry the “Plan.” Members who promote to management positions after this date shall only become eligible to 158
Item # C12.
participate in the Local 1699 Plan the month following the exhaustion of the funds from the Unrepresented Fire Plan fund.
159
Item # C12.

APPENDIX B

RETIREE APPLICATION TO UTILIZE FUND
To: The City of Milpitas Department of Human Resources
I submit the following information and application to request that the City of Milpitas ("City") use the assets in the Local Retiree Dependent Health Care Fund (the "Fund") to pay some or all of the premium of the dependent portion of my retiree health insurance, as and to the extent to which I am entitled,
Retiree:

1. Name: _______________________

2. Five or More Year of Service with City of Milpitas? ☐ Yes ☐ No

3. Date of Hire: _________________

4. Retired: ☐ Yes ☐ No

5. Date of CalPERS Retirement: ______________________

6. Currently Enrolled in City Health Plan? ☐ Yes ☐ No

7. Name of City Health Plan Currently Enrolled in: _________________________ Dependent, Spouse, or Registered Domestic Partner of Retiree For numbers 8-12, please provide information regarding the applicable dependent(s), spouse, or registered domestic partner.

8. Name: ________________________

9. Status: ☐ Dependent ☐ Spouse ☐ Registered Domestic Partner

10. Currently covered on retiree's health plan? ☐ Yes ☐ No

11. Eligible for health coverage under another health plan? ☐ Yes ☐ No

12. Currently eligible to have another employer or other third party pay dependent premiums of retiree? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Retiree Signature: Date
Printed Name:

Phone: (408) 586-3090
Fax: (408) 586-3092
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov

CITY OF MILPITAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
455 E. Calaveras Blvd.

Milpitas, CA 95035
160
Item # C12.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Approve and Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Side Letter to Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and United Public Employees of California (UPEC Local 792), the Professional-Technical Unit (Staff Contact: Jeannine Seher, Director of Human Resources, 408-586-3086)
Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to enter into a side letter agreement with the United Public Employees of California (UPEC Local 792), the Professional-Technical Unit, adding a new section to the Memorandum of Understanding to compensate qualified Community Service Officers when expressly assigned to work as Field Evidence Technicians (FET) a 5% pay differential above their base salary.

Background:

Per the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), employees in the Professional-Technical Unit assigned to duties of a higher class for at least sixteen (16) hours to work in an out-of-class capacity with fully upgraded duties or classification (100%) shall qualify for Temporary Upgrade Pay. Employees performing higher duties shall be compensated at least 5% more than their salary or at the entrance step of the range of the higher classification, whichever compensation pattern is greater except where such increase exceeds the pay range allocated to the assigned position. The employee shall be compensated at the appropriate rate retroactive to the start of the assignment.

The Union has requested the City authorize Temporary Upgrade Pay specifically for qualified Community Service Officers (CSOs) when performing Field Evidence Technician (FET) duties. The Field Evidence Technician assignment is higher-level work; however, the current MOU language does not address compensation for these assignments.

Analysis:

The parties recognize that qualified Community Services Officers (CSOs) may be assigned to perform Field Evidence Technician (FET) duties, a unique role within the Milpitas Police Department, at any time without advance notice, for an undetermined amount of time. The parties desire to compensate these qualified CSOs for time worked performing FET duties in order to recognize the higher-level duties.

Policy Alternative:

Alternative: Maintain the existing MOU language.

Pros: Will continue to provide compensation earnable when an employee is assigned to duties of a higher classification for at least sixteen (16) hours.

Cons: Not compensating employees for performing these higher level duties will diminish the willingness of CSO’s to perform the duties. The Police Department will have to use other higher paid trained officers to perform these duties, increasing costs and diminishing officer capacity.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City has negotiated in good faith with the Union and an agreement has been reached.
161
Item # C13.

Fiscal Impact:

Any costs from potentially higher utilization of temporary out of class pay will be absorbed in departmental budgets.

California Environmental Quality Act:

Approval of the recommendation is not an activity defined as a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b) (3) and 15378(b)(4) either because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and/or because the action is financial and/or administrative and does not directly impact the environment.

Recommendation:

Approve and authorize the City Manager to enter into a side letter agreement with the United Public Employees of California (UPEC Local 792), the Professional-Technical Unit, adding a new section to the Memorandum of Understanding to compensate qualified Community Service Officers when expressly assigned to work as Field Evidence Technicians (FET) a 5% pay differential above their base salary.

Attachment:

1. Side Letter to MOU with UPEC Local 792, the Professional-Technical Unit 162
Item # C13.

Side Letter of Understanding
By and Between
The City of Milpitas and the Professional -Technical Unit The City of Milpitas, hereby referred to as “City” and the Professional -Technical Unit, hereby referred to as “Union”, collectively as “the parties” execute this Side Letter of Understanding (“LOU”) regarding amendments to the existing Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”). Any provision of prior LOUs or Side Letters of Understanding that are inconsistent with this LOU are superseded by this LOU and are no longer in effect.

MOU provision, Section 24.02 Employees assigned to duties of a higher class for at least sixteen (16) hours to work in an out-of-class capacity with fully upgraded duties or classification (100%) shall qualify for Temporary Upgrade Pay. Employee shall be compensated at least 5% more than their salary or at the entrance step of the range of the higher classification, whichever compensation pattern is greater except where such increase exceeds the pay range allocated to the assigned position. The employee shall be compensated at the appropriate rate retroactive to the start of the assignment.

The parties recognize that qualified Community Services Officers (CSOs) may be assigned to perform Field Evidence Technician (FET) duties, a unique role within the Milpitas Police Department, at any time without advance notice, for an undetermined amount of time. The parties desire to compensate these qualified CSOs for time worked performing FET duties. As such, the City and the Union agree as follows:

Section 12 states:

SECTION 24.00 – TEMPORARY UPGRADE PAY/WORK OUT OF CLASS

24.01 – 24.03 (No Change)
Adding 24.04: The MOU shall be modified to include the new section 24.04:

24.04 The City agrees to compensate qualified Community Services Officers when expressly assigned to work as Field Evidence Technicians (FET) a 5% pay differential above their base salary. However, no additional compensation is due unless the CSO is expressly assigned, in advance of performing FET duties, by a supervisor at the Sergeant rank or higher. Such assignments shall be for at least half-hour increments.

For the City of Milpitas:

For the Union:

Jeannine Seher
Human Resources Director
Date
Steven G. McHarris
City Manager
Date
Ryan Heron, LIUNA
Business Representative
Date
Avery Stark, President Date
5/6/2022
163
Item # C13.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Make Findings and Determinations Set Forth in Assembly Bill 361 and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Virtual Meetings of the City Council and Legislative Bodies (Staff Contact: Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney, 408-586-3040) Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting Date: 3/17/2022
Recommendation: Move to make findings and determinations under Assembly Bill 361 and adopt a resolution authorizing virtual meetings of the City Council and legislative bodies.

Background:

On March 17, 2020, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow for local legislative bodies to conduct their meetings completely telephonically or by other electronic means.

The provisions in the Brown Act that were suspended by the Governor’s Executive Order are contained at Government Code Section 54953(b)(3) and require that when teleconferencing is used, outside of a statewide emergency, that the following occur:
 An agenda is required to be posted at all locations, including any teleconference locations  Each teleconference location must be identified on the actual agenda  Each teleconference location shall be accessible to the public  A quorum of the legislative body must be in the jurisdiction With the Governor’s Executive Order, the four above requirements were suspended, allowing Councilmembers to not have to post an agenda at their teleconference location, not have to identify their location on the meeting agenda, not have to ensure public accessibility at the teleconference location, and the legislative body did not need a quorum present in the jurisdiction. As the Council is well aware, this allowed all City Council meetings and other meetings of legislative bodies of the City to be conducted by Zoom with councilmembers, commission members, committee members, and staff all joining from remote virtual locations.

The suspension of certain provisions of the Brown Act was further extended by the Governor on June 11, 2021 by the issuance of Executive Order N-08-21 which continued to allow for complete virtual meetings until September 30, 2021.

With the expiration of the Governor’s Executive Order and the uncertainty that surrounded the Governor’s potential recall, the State Legislature also took the remote meeting issue into its own hands through the adoption of Assembly Bill 361, which is explained in more depth in the Analysis section below.

On October 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9105, making findings that there is an existing State of Emergency and that state or local officials continue to recommend social distancing measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19. In particular, the resolution included reference to Cal-OSHA regulation 3205, which recommends physical distancing in the workplace. The City Council reviewed the findings under Resolution No. 9105 through March 1, 2022, at which time the Council determined that the COVID-19 infection rate no longer 164
Item # C14.
necessitated virtual meetings. Since, March 1, 2022, the COVID-19 infection rate has substantially increased.

State and local health officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing, during a proclaimed state of emergency. Meeting in person presents imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees at certain public meetings. By motion and majority vote, the City Council may confirm the findings set forth in the resolution and to hold virtual meetings pursuant to AB 361.

Analysis:

On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361, which allows legislative bodies to meet virtually provided there is a state of emergency declared by the Governor, and either (1) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or (2) the legislative body determines by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees. The Governor by executive order signed on September 20, 2021, suspended the effective date of AB 361 to October 1, 2021. As a result, if the City desires to have virtual meetings on or after October 1, 2021, it must do so consistent with the requirements of AB 361.

AB 361 preserves many of the provisions of the earlier executive orders, including the suspension of the four teleconferencing requirements noted above, while also adding new requirements to the management of remote and teleconference public meetings in order to better achieve the levels of transparency that the Brown Act demands. Specifically, AB 361 imposes two new rules on remote public meetings:

1. Local governments and agencies hosting teleconference meetings in lieu of traditional in-person public meetings must permit direct public comment during the teleconference, and must leave open the opportunity for public comment until the comment period for a given item is closed during the ordinary course of the meeting. The opportunity to make public comment must be of a sufficient duration so as to allow actual public participation.

2. Any action by the governing body during a public teleconference meeting must occur while the agency is actively and successfully broadcasting to members of the public through a call-in option or an internet-based service option. If a technical disruption within the agency’s control prevents members of the public from either viewing the meeting of the public agency, or prevents members of the public from offering public comment, the agency must cease all action on the meeting agenda until the disruption ends and the broadcast is restored. Action taken during an agency-caused disruption may be challenged as a violation of the Brown Act.

In order to continue to qualify for AB 361’s waiver of in-person meeting requirements, the City Council must, within thirty (30) days of its first meeting under AB 361, and every thirty (30) days thereafter, make findings that (a) state or local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing, or that (b) an in-person meeting would constitute an imminent risk to the safety of attendees.

The above conditions continue to exist at this time, and staff recommends that the City Council by motion confirm the findings so forth in the attached resolution so that the City Council and all other subordinate legislative bodies may continue to meet virtually.

Lastly, it is important to that AB 361 is optional. If the City Council wishes, it may meet in person. In addition, hybrid meetings are permissible.

Policy Alternatives:

Alternative 1: Do not by motion confirm the findings made in the resolution making findings and do not make determinations under Assembly Bill 361 for the use of virtual meetings.

Pros: None
Cons: The City will not be able to meet virtually or through a hybrid format, when needed due to the health risks brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Reason not recommended: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a global health issue and flexibility to meet virtually is essential.
165
Item # C14.

Fiscal Impact:

The City Council’s reconfirmation of the findings made in the resolution to continue with virtual meetings will maintain the status quo and no financial impact is anticipated by the reconfirmation of the findings.

California Environmental Quality Act:

The City Council’s reconfirmation of the findings made in the resolution is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15378(b)(5) as it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Further, virtual meetings are likely to reduce certain impacts associated with vehicular travel related to in-person public meetings.

Recommendation:

Move to reconfirm findings and determinations under Resolution No.9105 and Assembly Bill 361 for the continuation of virtual meetings
Attachment

1. Resolution
166
Item # C14.

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS UNDER AB 361 FOR

THE AUTHORIZATION OF VIRTUAL MEETINGS AND AUTHORIZING SUCH MEETINGS WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City Council and other legislative bodies; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City of Milpitas’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54950 et seq.) (the “Brown Act”), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and WHEREAS, the Brown Act generally requires local agencies meeting via teleconference, including through other virtual or electronic means, to, among other things, provide public access at each location in which members of the legislative body are teleconferencing; and WHEREAS, the Legislature recently enacted Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which amended Government Code section 54953 to allow local agencies to meet fully virtually, without fully adhering to the rules otherwise applicable to teleconferencing, during a proclaimed state of emergency if state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; and WHEREAS, the Governor issued a proclamation declaring a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act, and this proclaimed state of emergency currently remains in effect; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Milpitas has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and
WHEREAS, state or local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 Cal-OSHA regulation 3205 recommends physical distancing in the workplace generally and regulates a “close contact” defined as being within 6 feet of another under certain circumstances; and
WHEREAS, in order to continue to impose social distancing while holding in-person meetings there is a high likelihood that members of the public would not all be able to be present in the meetings spaces; and
WHEREAS, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees and would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the authorization of virtual meetings will allow for full participation by members of the public until social distancing recommendations are no longer necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Milpitas desires that all City legislative bodies to hold virtual meetings pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code section 54953(e).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other 167
Item # C14.

Resolution No.
materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council and all other legislative bodies of the City of Milpitas who are required to hold public meetings, shall meet virtually in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and without compliance with section 54953(b)(3) based upon the findings and determinations hereby made by the City Council.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) June 16, 2022, or such time the Milpitas City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City of Milpitas may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of May 2021, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Wendy Wood, City Clerk Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
168
Item # C14.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize and Approve Out-of-State Travel to Reno, NV for Mayor Rich Tran, and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano to Attend the United States Conference of Mayors to be Held on June 3 – 6, 2022 for a Combined Total Estimated Amount of $4,700 (Staff Contact: Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053) Category: Consent Calendar-Leadership and Support Services Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Authorize and approve out-of-state travel to Reno, NV for Mayor Rich Tran, and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano to attend the United States Conference of Mayors to be held on June 3 – 6, 2022 for a combined total estimated amount of $4,700.

Background:

The United States Conference of Mayors holds an Annual Meeting each June in a different United States city.

This year’s Annual Meeting is scheduled in Reno, Nevada from June 3 to 6, 2022. During the Conference’s June Annual Meeting, standing committees recommend policy positions they believe should be adopted by the organization. All policy positions adopted at the annual meeting collectively represent the views of the nation’s mayors and are distributed to the President of the United States and Congress. Additionally, mayors are grouped into task forces to examine and act on issues that demand special attention such as the intersection of public safety and technology; the new crypto economy; economic opportunities for cities of all sizes resulting from the new remote workforce and bringing emerging and digital-based businesses to cities; focus on the threat of disinformation and effective communications strategies; a discussion on the leadership to address the state of mental health for all ages in our nation; engagement with high-level Biden Administration officials on priorities such as the implementation of the $1.2 trillion infrastructure law; and the sharing of best practices and innovative projects among mayors. The preliminary agenda is attached to this report.

Analysis:

The City of Milpitas Travel and Expense Policy requires all travel for the elected officials and City Manager to be approved by City Council. Council approval of this request will allow Mayor Tran and Vice Mayor Montano to garner additional knowledge from other US Mayors and elected officials and to bring it back to share with their colleagues. Continued participation and attendance in national conferences and events is a way to ensure that the Milpitas community is fully represented at the regional, state, and national levels.

Policy Alternatives:

Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact:

The total estimated expenses for the United States Conference of Mayor in Reno Nevada per attendee are $2,350 (includes the registration and hotel fees, as well as transportation, per diem, and mileage reimbursements).

To date, Mayor Tran has not utilized his Individual Elected Official allocation of $5,000 for Conferences / Meetings / Memberships. With the approval of this out-of-state travel, the new estimated remaining balance will be $2,650.
169
Item # C15.

To date, Vice Mayor Montano has a remaining balance of $2,854.31 in her Individual Elected Official allocation of $5,000 for Conferences/Meetings/Memberships. With the approval of this out-of-state travel, the new estimated remaining balance will be $504.31.

California Environmental Quality Act:

By the definition provided in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378, this action does not qualify as a “project” for the purpose of CEQA.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve out-of-state travel to Reno, NV for Mayor Rich Tran, and Vice Mayor Carmen Montano to attend the United States Conference of Mayors to be held on June 3 – 6, 2022 for a combined total estimated amount of $4,700.

Attachments:

1. Draft United States Conference of Mayors Agenda

2. Council budget tracking
170
Item # C15.

Notes:

Times and days of events are subject to change.

More details on speakers and forum topics will be added as they confirm.

The listing of mayoral chairs, moderators or speakers does not confirm attendance.

The 90th
Annual Meeting
of
The United States
Conference of
Mayors
June 3-6, 2022
Reno, NV
The Peppermill Resort
ATTACHMENT 1
171
Item # C15.

DRAFT AGENDA
Welcome
To the 90th Annual Meeting of
The United States Conference of Mayors
June 3-6, 2022
The Peppermill Resort
Reno, NV
Key Information for Attendees Page 1
Host City Ground Transportation Page 3
Themes and Opportunities Page 4

DAILY SCHEDULE
Thursday, June 2 Page 5
Friday, June 3 Page 6
Saturday, June 4 Page 16
Sunday, June 5 Page 27
Monday, June 6 Page 35
Workforce Development Council (WDC) Page 39
The United States Conference of Mayors Presidents Page 40 The United States Conference of Mayors Leadership Page 42 172
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
Key Information for Attendees
Participation
Unless otherwise noted, all plenary sessions, committee meetings, council meetings, best practice forums, and social events are open to all mayors and other officially registered attendees.

Registration/Host City Hospitality
The Conference Registration Desk and Host City Hospitality are located in TBD. The Registration Desk hours are:
● Thursday, June 2: 3:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
● Friday, June 3: 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
● Saturday, June 4: 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
● Sunday, June 5: 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
● Monday, June 6: 7:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.

Badges and Lanyards
The badge provided to you upon check-in is the official identification for admission to all events at the 90th Winter Meeting. It is required that all delegates, participants, and guests wear their registration badges to enter all sessions, meeting areas, and social events. The color-coded lanyard supplied must also be worn with the badge at all times.

Failure to wear the badge and lanyard for viewing by security may cause inconvenience to participants. There will be a $50 fee for the replacement of lost badges. Photo ID will be required upon check-in to pick up your badge.

Lanyard Color Code

BLUE MEMBER MAYOR

RED SERVICE CITY MEMBER MAYOR
YELLOW NON–MEMBER MAYOR
BLACK USCM PLATINUM PARTNER, BUSINESS COUNCIL or SPONSOR

SILVER USCM STAFF

GREEN PRESS
LIGHT BLUE USCM SPEAKER; ALLIED COUNCIL, GUEST
CORAL REGISTRANT’S FAMILY, SPOUSE, PARTNER, OR CHILD

PURPLE HOST CITY STAFF, VOLUNTEERS, AND GUESTS
Mobile App
Download the official mobile app to view the agenda, attending mayors, and more. You can find it at usmayors.org/app.

Available on the App Store and Google Play.

Participation
Unless otherwise noted, all plenary sessions, committee meetings, council meetings, best practice forums, and social events are open to all mayors and other officially-registered attendees.

Spouse and Guest Activities
Spouses and youth are welcome to attend all Conference evening social functions. Information on spouse and family day activities are available on the Host City Website at uscmreno.com.

Title Sponsor
1 173
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
Media Coverage
Unless otherwise noted, all plenary sessions, committee meetings, council meetings, and best practice forums are all open to credentialed press registrants. All social/evening events are CLOSED to press registrants wishing to cover the meeting for their news agency.

All plenary sessions are streamed live on our YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook channels.

The hashtag for the meeting is #Mayors2022
Working Press Registration
All press must register here (link TBD) and pick up credentials to gain access to Annual Meeting events. Press credentials may be picked up beginning at 8:00 a.m. on Friday, June 3 at the USCM registration desk.

Social Media Filming
During the 90th Annual Meeting, mayors are invited to take part and film short social media clips, sharing their thoughts on how mayoral leadership is making a difference on our key priorities. Videos are being filmed in Tuscany 12 during meeting hours. Schedule an opportunity by emailing [email protected].

Resolution and Committee Deadline
The deadline for submission of proposed resolutions by member mayors was Wednesday, May 4 at 5:00 pm ET. This was the same deadline for standing committee membership changes. Members could submit resolutions and update committee memberships through our USCM Community web site at community.usmayors.org.

Voting
Only member mayors of a standing committee are eligible to vote on resolutions before that standing committee.

Mayors who wish to record a no vote in a standing committee or the business session should do so within the mobile app.

Business Session Voting Credentials
Voting Credentials will be available for the Saturday Business Session Vote at the Conference Registration Desk, beginning at 7:00 a.m. on Sunday, June 5.

It will be necessary for all Official Delegates who wish to vote to have these credentials in their possession. There is but one credential for each member city. If the Mayor of a member city is registered, the credential will be issued to him or her. If the Mayor is not registered and has not been in attendance at the Annual Conference, a registered official from their city must have been designated, in advance, in writing, to be the Official Delegate to receive the city’s credentials.

If a registered Member Mayor anticipates that they will not be present at the Business Session, they may designate an alternate, who must be a registered official from their city, to pick up the city’s voting credential and exercise the city’s vote on Sunday morning. Such an alternate, however, cannot have the floor to speak to any issue under discussion.

The appropriate form for designating an alternate may be filled out at the Registration Desk from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on Sunday, June 5 and prior to the Business Session on Monday, June 6.

Charging Stations
Signify is pleased to provide The Signify LiFi Lounge in the Tuscany Ballroom Area. Available to all mayors during the 90th Annual Meeting in Reno, The Signify LiFi lounge includes Internet access using LiFi (Light Fidelity) charging stations for electronic devices as well as light refreshments.

Title Sponsor
2 174
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
Complimentary Transportation: Arrivals & Departures from Reno-Tahoe International Airport Arrivals on Wednesday, June 1, and Thursday, June 2
Attendees and their guests arriving at the Reno-Tahoe International Airport will be met by USCM 2022 volunteers at the bottom of the escalators on the way out, past security. Look for staff wearing the USCM 2022 official volunteer shirts, identify yourselves as attendees to the conference and you will be escorted to baggage claim and the River Room across from baggage carousel 4. Assistance with luggage and complimentary refreshments while you wait will be provided in the River Room. Transportation for your transfer to the Peppermill will pick you up from outside the River Room doors.

Transportation will depart the airport approximately every 30 minutes.

Departures on Monday, June 6, and Tuesday, June 7
Complimentary transportation will be provided from the Peppermill to the airport from 4:30am until 11:45 pm every day. Attendees should plan to meet right outside the Peppermill Bell Desk to board the shuttle to the airport. USCM 2022 volunteers will be on hand to assist you with the appropriate transportation. The coaches are scheduled to leave every hour at the top of the hour. We suggest that you meet fifteen (15) minutes prior to departure time for a smooth departure.

Evening Event Transportation
Complimentary transportation will be provided to evening events that are off the hotel property on June 4, 5, and 6.

Attendees and their guests will be directed to the East Vestibule of the Tuscany Ballroom to load the Motorcoaches taking them to the evening venues. Coaches will begin departing at 6:30 p.m. on Saturday, June 4, and Sunday, June 5, and at 3:30 p.m. on Monday, June 6. This is no ordinary wait in line - enjoy the queue in true Reno style with entertainment and beverages to get the party started early! Title Sponsor
3 175
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
Themes/Areas of Focus/Opportunities
The 90th Annual Meeting of The United States Conference of Mayors is being developed around the following areas:

1. Priorities identified by the 80th President of The United States Conference of Mayors Miami Mayor Francis X.

Suarez for the Annual Meeting including: the intersection of public safety and technology; the new crypto economy; and economic opportunities for cities of all sizes resulting from the new remote workforce and bringing emerging and digital-based businesses to cities.

2. A Mayors-Only Session on Friday afternoon focused on the threat of disinformation and effective communications strategies.

3. A special discussion on the leadership being provided by mayors to address the state of mental health for all ages in our nation - joined by the U.S. Surgeon General.

4. Engagement with high-level Biden Administration officials on priorities such as implementation of the $1.2 trillion infrastructure law, as well as other key policy and thought leaders.

5. The increasing issue of state preemption of cities that impacts their residents on major issues.

6. Numerous opportunities for direct mayor-to-mayor engagement on a wide range of topics impacting cities of all sizes and in all regions of our Nation; and the sharing of best practices and innovative projects among mayors.

7. The consideration, debate and adoption of policy resolutions submitted by member mayors. This will take place during the meetings of the 10 policy Standing Committees on Friday, June 3 and Saturday, June 4, and then during the official Annual Business Session on Monday morning, September 6.

8. Networking opportunities with USCM Platinum Partners and Mayors Business Council Members.

9. Evening events arranged by Mayor Hillary Schieve and her host committee that will highlight the very best of Reno - and give all attendees the opportunity to talk, share stories, and be together again as part of the USCM family. You can see all that is happening by checking out the Reno Website.

Title Sponsor
4 176
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
THURSDAY, JUNE 2
Biggest Little Clean-Up & Park Beautification
10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

Locomotion Plaza / Biggest Little Dog Park
Mayor Schieve and Climate Summit mayors will participate in a park beautification, including tree and annual bulb planting.

Transportation: Transportation provided by Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) in an electric bus.

Suggested Attire: Casual, Gardening Clothes
Registration
3:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Pre-Meeting
Climate Mayors Summit
1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Location: Capri Ballroom
The Climate Mayors Summit, hosted by Climate Mayors in partnership with C40, will bring mayors together for mayor-to-mayor dialogue, strategy development, and networking through closed door, plenary and social forums organized around key climate themes.

Chair SYLVESTER TURNER
Mayor of Houston
Chair of the Climate Mayors
Separate Registration Is Required. Register for the Climate Mayors Summit.

Note: This meeting is for mayors and other invited guests only.

Climate Mayors Summit Reception
5:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.

Title Sponsor
5 177
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Registration
7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Friday Morning Plenary Session
7:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Tuscany Ballroom
Breakfast will be available beginning at 7:15 a.m.

Program begins at 7:50 a.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Armchair
Discussion Healthy Buildings in Cities
The International WELL Building Institute (IWBI), the global leader in healthy buildings, works to empower city leaders with specific strategies to better leverage their city’s buildings, public spaces and programs to advance health, well-being and social equity. Join Mayor Suarez for a discussion on ways city leadership can deliver more thoughtful and intentional spaces that enhance human health and well-being using the WELL Building Standard, to promote the creation of safer, healthier spaces and navigate a people-first, equitable recovery from COVID-19.

Moderator FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Remarks PAUL SCIALLA
Founder and CEO
Delos
Support provided by Delos and the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI).

The New Crypto Economy and Government
As the world demands more transparency from its leaders, new tools emerge as opportunities for cities to be more nimble, open, and helpful. Join Mayors Suarez and Schieve and Blockchain/Crypto partner Algorand for a discussion on what the future looks like for your city.

Moderator SAIF ISHOOF
Managing Partner
Lab22c
Panelists FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Title Sponsor
6 178
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3

HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno
Second Vice President, The United States Conference of Mayors TBD
Algorand

COUNCIL MEETINGS
Council on Metro Economies and the New American City
9:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m.

Location TBD
Chair ANDREW J. GINTHER
Mayor of Columbus, OH
Vice Chairs MIKE DUGGAN
Mayor of Detroit

SATYA RHODES-CONWAY
Mayor of Madison
Remarks U.S. Metro Economies Update and Forecast

JIM DIFFLEY
Executive Director - Economics
IHS Markit
Title Sponsor
7 179
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Mayors Water Council
9:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m.

Location TBD
Co-Chairs DANIEL HORRIGAN
Mayor of Akron

DEBORAH ROBERTSON
Mayor of Rialto
Remarks TBA

STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING
Membership Standing Committee
9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.

Location TBD
Chair BRIAN C. WAHLER
Mayor of Piscataway
Remarks TBA

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Electrification of the U.S. Transportation System
10:45 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.

Location TBD
The Task Force on Electric Vehicles will discuss strategies for developing local EV charging station networks, and the $7.5 billion available through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s DOT program for creating a national electric charging network.

Moderators STEVE ADLER
Mayor of Austin
Co-Chair, Electric Vehicle Task Force

JAMAEL TITO BROWN
Mayor of Youngstown
Co-Chair, Electric Vehicle Task Force
Title Sponsor
8 180
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3

DAVID HOLT
Mayor of Oklahoma City
Co-Chair, Electric Vehicle Task Force
Remarks Electric Vehicle Charging Programs in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law

ANDREW WISHNIA
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Climate Policy
United States Department of Transportation

CHARLES SMALL
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs United States Department of Transportation
Energy Innovations Best Practices
10:45 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.

Location TBD
The Energy Sector in the USA is transforming by integrating renewable sourcing, upgrading important grid infrastructure, and innovating in how the industry meets growing customer demand while reducing carbon emissions.

This session brings experts from key energy industry organizations in Nevada to explore how they are evolving through technology advancements to achieve clean energy goals and provide a reliable electricity supply.

Moderator HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno
Second Vice President, The United States Conference of Mayors Panelists TBA
Grants to Help Mayors Better Serve Veterans and Defense Communities 10:45 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.

Location TBD
Moderator JOHN TECKLENBERG
Mayor of Charleston, SC
Chair, Veterans Affairs Task Force
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
9 181
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Security at Sporting Events
10:45 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.

Location TBD
Moderator BUDDY DYER
Mayor of Orlando
Chair, Mayors Professional Sports Alliance
Remarks PLAY BALL Weekend and Sandlot VItilla

DOUGLAS PALMER
USCM Past President and Former Mayor of Trenton
Major League Baseball
USCM Platinum Partner

LEE IGEL
Clinical Professor
Preston Robert Tisch Institute for Global Sport
New York University
ELIZABETH A. HAAS
Adjunct Professor
Preston Robert Tisch Institute for Global Sport
New York University
Opening Press Conference
11:45 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Remarks by Host Mayor and USCM Officers
Mayors Climate Protection Awards Luncheon
1:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Sponsored by Walmart
Program begins at 1:15 p.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
2022 Mayors Climate Protection Awards
Awards
Presentation AMY HILL
Senior Director, Public Affairs & Government Relations
Walmart
USCM Platinum Partner
Title Sponsor
10 182
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Plenary Panel Title TBD
Description….

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Plenary Panel The Role of Philanthropy & Collaboration in Communities This panel discussion will examine how mayors, working with philanthropy, can create new collaborative funding models to help meet their cities' most pressing needs.

Panelists Walton Family Foundation Executive, Mayors
Remarks ANDY PIERCE
Endorsement Partner Manager
Nationwide Retirement Solutions
USCM Platinum Partner
Remarks RETA JO LEWIS
President and Chair of the Board of Directors
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
11 183
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3

STANDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Criminal and Social Justice
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair QUINTON LUCAS
Mayor of Kansas City, MO
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Energy
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair JON MITCHELL
Mayor of New Bedford
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Preparing Your City for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Allotment Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
12 184
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Jobs, Education, and the Workforce
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair KATE GALLEGO
Mayor of Phoenix
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Cities’ Best Practices to Support Small Businesses and Entrepreneurship 3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Room TBD
Moderator ELIZABETH B. KAUTZ
Mayor of Burnsville
Co-Chair, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Task Force

WILLIAM WILD
Mayor of Westfield
Co-Chair, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Task Force Panelist ABBI WHITAKER
The Abbi Agency
Remarks LOUIS MOSCA
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
American Management Services
USCM Platinum Partner
Title Sponsor
13 185
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Promoting Equity through ARPA’s $65.1 billion Local Fiscal Recovery Fund 3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Room TBD
Cities will explore how they have used their unprecedented allocations of fiscal recovery funds to promote transformation and equity in underserved communities.

Moderator ANDREW GINTHER
Mayor of Columbus
Chair, Council on Metro Economies and the New American City Remarks TBA
Mayors-Only Session: The Threat of Disinformation and Effective Communications Strategies (Closed to Press)
4:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Program begins at 4:30 p.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Title Sponsor
14 186
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
FRIDAY, JUNE 3

EVENING EVENT
Opening Reception at the Peppermill
6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.

Tuscany Ballroom
Whether you were born in Reno, or moved here, the people that live in this community will tell you that “Home Means Nevada” This holds true to many that have moved away, but find their way back to what many call “The Biggest Little City”. Reno may be famous for its shining neon lights and casinos, but chancing your luck is not the only best thing to do in Reno. Reno has a lot to offer and is close to some amazing destinations. From visiting the famous Reno Arch, to Midtown with their local brews and vibe, skiing in Lake Tahoe, strolling through the streets of Virginia City and stopping at the Silver Dollar Saloon for a cocktail, and maybe catching a football game at the University of Nevada! GO PACK!! Join us for an evening of cocktails and some amazing food that Peppermill is well known for. What better way to start what will be an amazing Conference!
Suggested Attire: Cocktail - Color theme of Blue and Silver Title Sponsor
15 187
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Registration
7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Location TBD

STANDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS
International Affairs
8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Location TBD
Acting Chair DAVID HOLT
Mayor of Oklahoma City
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Tourism, Arts, Parks, Entertainment, and Sports
8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Location TBD
Chair HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks MARIA ROSARIO JACKSON
Chair
National Endowment for the Arts

MEGAN K MILLER
Senior Advisor
Burning Man Project

MARNEE BENSON
Director of Government Affairs
Burning Man
Title Sponsor
16 188
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Leveraging Outdoor Recreation for Economic Development

COLIN ROBERTSON
Administrator, Division of Outdoor Recreation
Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Chair, Confluence of States

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Financing Carbon Reduction Projects through Local Carbon Credits 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Location TBD
Moderator JAMES BRAINARD
Mayor of Carmel, IN
Co-Chair, Energy Independence and Climate Protection Task Force Panelists Carbon Credits

GIDEON GRADMAN
Managing Director, Energy & Infrastructure Group
Baker Tilly Capital
Update Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program

JON MITCHELL
Mayor of New Bedford
Chair, Energy Standing Committee
Responding to Mass Shootings: Advice and Assistance for Mayors 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Location TBD
The session will provide advice to mayors about preparing for and responding to a mass shooting and information on assistance available to them.

Moderator BUDDY DYER
Mayor of Orlando
Panelists SARAH PECK
Director
UnitedOnGuns
ANNE K. SEYMOUR
Associate Academic Program Director
National Mass Violence Victimization Resource Center
Others TBA
Title Sponsor
17 189
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Opening Plenary Session
9:30 a.m. - 11:15 a.m.

Location TBD
Program begins at 9:35 a.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Presentation
of the Colors Reno Fire/Police Departments
National
Anthem JENNIFER GRANT
Invocation DR. CÉSAR MINERA
Minister, Word Of Life Ministries
Welcome HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno, Host
Second Vice President, The United States Conference of Mayors Video
Introduction TOM COCHRAN
CEO and Executive Director
The United States Conference of Mayors
Video The Suarez Presidency
President’s
Address FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Armchair
Discussion Subject TBA
Title Sponsor
Support provided by The American Institute of Architects.

Title Sponsor
18 190
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Introduction RON NIRENBERG
Mayor of San Antonio
Chair, Mayors and Business Leaders Center for Compassionate and Equitable Cities
Announcement LAYSHA WARD
Executive Vice President & Chief External Engagement Officer Target Corporation
Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program –
Announcement of Second Round Grant Winners
Remarks TBA

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Post-Covid: The Home Reimagined
11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Location TBD
As a result of the pandemic, homes have become reimagined to serve multiple purposes. Evolving from traditional use, many now look to their homes to learn, work remotely and earn extra income via online marketplaces. Existing rooms have turned into offices and garages into gyms or creative studios with the goal of economic freedom with this flexible space. This trend has become the new normal in cities across the United States which can be called the “ownership economy”. Over the past year, Airbnb has worked with local governments to expand the ownership economy. This session will explore how Airbnb and cities can continue this work.

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Airbnb.

Title Sponsor
19 191
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Cities and Electric Vehicles
11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Location TBD
Description…
Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Hertz.

Title Sponsor
20 192
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Saturday Plenary Lunch
1:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Sponsored by TBD
Program begins at 1:15 p.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Armchair
Discussion Title TBA
Description…
Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Wells Fargo.

Plenary Panel Maternal Health: Making Every Childbirth Healthy and Safe In this session, we will hear mayoral best practices designed to support pregnant people and new mothers throughout pregnancy and beyond including efforts to strengthen the health workforce. We will also hear about how to address community factors and the social determinants of health - the conditions in which people live and work – to improve maternal health and help families to thrive. This session is sponsored by Merck, through Merck for Mothers, the company’s global initiative to create a world where no woman has to die while giving life.

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Merck.

Remarks TBA
Announcement 2022 PLAY BALL/Vamos Vitilla
Major League Baseball
Title Sponsor
21 193
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4

STANDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Children, Health, and Human Services
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair LEVAR STONEY
Mayor of Richmond, VA
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks Gun Violence is a Public Health Crisis

LEVAR STONEY
Mayor of Richmond, VA

SHAWN PATTERSON-HOWARD
Mayor of Mount Vernon, NY
Living with COVID: The Impact of Long Term COVID
BECHARA CHOUCAIR, M.D.

Chief Health Officer
Kaiser Permanente
Community Development and Housing
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair WADE KAPSZUKIEWICZ
Mayor of Toledo
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
22 194
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Environment
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair TBA
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Metro Economies
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair LUKE BRONIN
Mayor of Hartford
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Transportation and Communications
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair MICHAEL B. HANCOCK
Mayor of Denver
Consideration of Proposed Resolutions
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
23 195
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Current Immigration Issues
4:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.

Location TBD
The session will include discussions about the increase in migration across the Southern border, how cities are responding to it and the federal help available to local agencies and the resettlement of Ukrainian evacuees in the United States.

Moderators TBA
Remarks TBA
Promoting Economic Mobility in Your City
4:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.

Location TBD
The session will explore city economic mobility programs supported by the United States Conference of Mayors’ Economic Mobility Campaign and its founding sponsor, Bank of America.

Moderator TBA
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
24 196
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Nominating Committee (Closed)
4:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Chair DAVID HOLT
Mayor of Oklahoma City
Members STEVE ADLER
Mayor of Austin
BRYAN K. BARNETT
Mayor of Rochester Hills, MI
HARDIE DAVIS, JR.

Mayor Augusta, GA

GREG FISCHER
Mayor of Louisville

JOHN GILES
Mayor of Mesa
MICHAEL B. HANCOCK
Mayor of Denver
ELIZABETH B. KAUTZ
Mayor of Burnsville

CHRISTINA MURYN
Mayor of Findlay

LEVAR STONEY
Mayor of Richmond, VA

SYLVESTER TURNER
Mayor of Houston

STEVE WILLIAMS
Mayor of Huntington, WV

VICTORIA WOODARDS
Mayor of Tacoma, WA
Alternate JUAN CARLOS “JC” BERMUDEZ
Mayor of Doral
Title Sponsor
25 197
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22

EVENING EVENT
The Evolution of Disco at the National Bowling Stadium
7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.

Whether you’re more of a “Le Freak” fan or prefer getting down to Daft Punk, this Evolution of Disco Party plays it all.

Just like Reno, disco and music have evolved over the decades. We invite you to come to our world-famous National Bowling Stadium and shake a leg. Wear your best disco duds or simply pop on some glowing accouterment when you get here and get ready for a good time! Take in what this quirky and spectacular party has to offer, including 78 lanes of tournament bowling, enthusiastic drag queens, and raucous dancing lessons. Lose yourself to the music in the Silent Disco, sample custom-crafted cuisine and specialty cocktails, and take a new headshot in the neon glow. We know there’s no place else in the world quite like Reno and we can’t wait to show you why we love it - through interpretive disco dancing!
Transportation: Motorcoaches will depart at 6:30 p.m. and will be on-hand to return all guests to the Peppermill throughout the evening and at the conclusion of the event.

Suggested Attire: A prize will be awarded for Best Dressed so colorful, fun, disco-inspired outfits are encouraged! Think sequins, sparkles and lots of flash. Bowling shoes will be provided but please bring socks.

Title Sponsor
26 198
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5
Registration
7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Mayors and Business Leaders Plenary Breakfast
7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

Location TBD
Sponsored by TBD
Program begins at 7:50 a.m.

Presiding CAROLYN G. GOODMAN
Mayor of Las Vegas
Chair, Mayors Business Council Task Force
Greetings TOM COCHRAN
CEO and Executive Director
The United States Conference of Mayors

TRACEY HESTER
Director, State & Local Government Affairs
Target Corporation
USCM Platinum Partner
Co-Chair, Mayors Business Council Steering Committee

DAVID GOLDWATER
Vice President
Stantec
Co-Chair, Mayors Business Council Steering Committee
Greetings Uber
Remarks TBA
Plenary Panel Title TBA
Description….

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Destinations International.

Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
27 199
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
Cybersecurity Best Practices in America’s Cities
9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.

Location TBD
American mayors are on the front lines in helping secure our cyber infrastructure, especially with increased threats from foreign actors, especially Russia. In this best practice forum, hear from mayors and experts as they share the best strategies for mayors of cities of all sizes as we work to avoid security intrusions and hacks.

Moderator STEVE ADLER
Mayor of Austin
Chair, Technology and Innovation Task Force
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Mastercard.

Homelessness is Solvable: Learning from Communities that are Built for Zero 9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.

Location TBD
This panel will include mayors who have demonstrated leadership and commitment to solving homelessness and will provide insights on how mayors can use their convening power to create community-wide accountability for reducing homelessness in their communities. It will also include a representative from the United States Interagency on Homelessness who will speak to how the federal government will specifically support local governments in this effort.

Moderator ROSANNE HAGGERTY
President and CEO
Community Solutions
Panelists Mayors TBA

LARRY MORRISSEY
Former Mayor of Rockford

JEFF OLIVET
Executive Director
United States Interagency Council on Homelessness
Others TBA
Support provided by Community Solutions.

Title Sponsor
28 200
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5
Leveraging the Private Sector to Modernize Local Infrastructure 9:15 a.m. - 10:15 p.m.

Location TBD
As governments tackle the challenges of repairing and building America’s infrastructure network to support 21 stcentury
needs, a key component of this conversation centers around how to bring this vision into reality for cities throughout the nation. Join Kiewit, one of North America’s largest and most respected construction and engineering organizations, for a panel discussion on how Administrations can position cities to secure the best value for their investment. The panel of mayors, private and public sector experts will feature best practices on how to effectively engage the construction and engineering industry to procure and construct sustainable infrastructure, including optimizing project schedules and delivering greater cost certainty throughout the project lifecycle.

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by Kiewit.

Sunday Morning Plenary Session
10:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.

Location TBD
Program begins at 10:30 a.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Greetings The Rockefeller Foundation
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
29 201
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
How to Decarbonize Your City and Make it Energy Efficient 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Location TBD
Recently, the City of Reno signed on to participate in the State & Local Building Performance Standards Coalition, a federal initiative announced by President Biden at the United States Conference of Mayors 90th Winter Meeting.

The coalition aims to adopt building performance standards in 29 participating cities, two counties, and two states by Earth Day 2024.

What’s most exciting about Building Performance Standards, which provide a pathway to decarbonize existing buildings within your city, is that these standards also pair well with net-zero energy codes for new buildings. As mayor, you can rely on architects as a trusted partner when it comes to the adoption of Building Performance Standards and net-zero energy codes, such as the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and the optional Zero Energy Commercial Building Appendix. Join us for a unique discussion led by AIA architects focused on equitably improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions in both new and existing buildings. For this session, we will be joined by mayors who have successfully implemented these programs.

Moderator TBA
Panelists TBA
Support provided by The American Institute of Architects.

The Power of Pets: 90 Million Reasons Why Pet Friendly Cities Thrive 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.

Location TBD
With 70% of U.S. households now owning a pet – and more people than ever seeing pets as family members – this panel will highlight how Mayors are leading the way with innovative policies and programs that help people enjoy the benefits of a life with pets, and keep people and pets together in tough times. We’ll plan to highlight the four pillars of our BETTER CITIES FOR PETS model (shelters, businesses, homes and parks) and have one Mayor slated to speak about best practices for each area.

Moderator TBD
Panelists TBD
Support provided by Mars.

Title Sponsor
30 202
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5
Sunday Plenary Luncheon
1:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Sponsored by TBD
Program begins at 1:15 p.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Greetings AT&T
Plenary Panel Making Cities Safer, More Sustainable, and More Equitable Description…
Moderator TBA
Panelists ANDREW GINTHER
Mayor of Columbus, OH
Support provided by Honeywell.

Remarks TBA
State of Mental Health for all Ages in our Nation: Mayoral Leadership Description…
Remarks TBA
FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors

HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno
Second Vice President, The United States Conference of Mayors

LEVAR STONEY
Mayor of Richmond, VA
Chair, Children, Health and Human Services Committee
Title Sponsor
31 203
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Current Issues in Public Safety
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Moderator TBA
Remarks TBA
Small Cities: We Can Handle It
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Moderator CHRIS BARNETT
Mayor of the Charter Township of Orion
Co-Chair, Small Cities Forum
Remarks TBD
Executive Committee Meeting (Closed)
3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Title Sponsor
32 204
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5
Women Mayors Leadership Alliance of The U.S. Conference of Mayors Plenary Session 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m.

Location TBD
This meeting is open to all 90th Annual Meeting participants.

Program begins at 4:15 p.m.

Chair VICTORIA WOODARDS
Mayor of Tacoma, WA
Vice Chair KATHY SHEEHAN
Mayor of Albany
Remarks TBA
Plenary Panel Improving Gender Equity and Inclusion in Cities Description…
Moderator VICTORIA WOODARDS
Mayor of Tacoma, WA
Panelists TBA
Community Leaders of America (CLA) | Forum for Community Leaders (FCL) Republican Mayor Forum Reception (Closed to Press)
5:30 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Chairwoman ACQUANETTA WARREN
Mayor of Fontana
Democratic Mayors Association Meeting (Closed to Press) 5:30 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.

Location TBD
President LEVAR STONEY
Mayor of Richmond, VA
Title Sponsor
33 205
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
SUNDAY, JUNE 5

EVENING EVENT
Silver Gala at Rancharrah
7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.

While you probably know Nevada is the Silver State, have you ever really experienced how we carry that legacy forward into the Reno you see today? Come face to face with this unique blend of past and present at the Silver Gala at Rancharrah. Embrace Reno’s distinctive story on this historic property by diving into some of the activities our state is known for - but with a twist. Gamble non-monetary chips that become a donation to one of our hard-working, local non-profits. Eat and drink your way through our Basque heritage - one of the many groups that helped shape Reno and Northern Nevada. Fall in love with the Great Reno Balloon Race in the heart of South Reno. From the Rancharrah Clubhouse and the copious yard games to the lighthearted gaming and local musical talent, this will be a gala unlike any other!
Transportation: Motorcoaches will depart at 6:30 p.m. and will be on-hand to return all guests to the Peppermill throughout the evening and at the conclusion of the event.

Suggested Attire: As we honor Nevada's heritage as the Silver State, we invite you to adorn yourself in silver, perhaps with a vintage flair. The sophisticated soiree will be outdoors on the grass - stilettos are not recommended.

Title Sponsor
34 206
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
MONDAY, JUNE 6
Registration
7:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.

Location TBD
Continental breakfast will be available beginning at 7:30 a.m.

Civic I/O Plenary Session
8:30 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.

Location TBD
Continental breakfast will be available beginning at 7:30 a.m.

Program begins at 8:35 a.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Remarks Quality of the New Census Data and What it Means for Cities

ROBERT SANTOS
Director
United States Census Bureau
Remarks Civic I/O Mayors Summit at SXSW: March 9-12, 2023 TBA
Title
South by Southwest
Video Civic I/O: The Mayors Summit at SXSW
Mayors’ Civic Tech Pitch
Support provided by Kapor Capital.

Presentation Winner of the Civic I/O Mayors Civic Tech Pitch 2022 TBA
Title
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
35 207
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
MONDAY, JUNE 6
Business Session
10:15 a.m. - 11:15 a.m.

Location TBD
Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Debate and Adoption by Membership of Resolutions Reported out by the Standing Committees Vote on Nominating Committee Recommendations
Installation of Officers

BEST PRACTICE FORUMS
11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.

Closing Plenary Lunch
12:45 p.m. - 2:00 p.m.

Location TBD
Sponsored by TBD
Program begins at 1:00 p.m.

Presiding FRANCIS X. SUAREZ
Mayor of Miami
President, The United States Conference of Mayors
Remarks TBA
Title Sponsor
36 208
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
MONDAY, JUNE 6

RENO WORKSHOPS
Art & Mural Tour
2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.

Reno Midtown
Reno has a rich art history and culture of off-the-wall (on-the-wall?) murals, imaginative sculptures, and unique Burning Man installations. While some are obvious, many are hidden gems peppered around the city. Put on your walking shoes, grab your camera, and join the Director of Art Spot Reno, Geralda Miller, on an exploratory meandering of Reno's midtown art gems.

Docent GERALDA MILLER
Reno: Reignited and Resilient
2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.

Location TBD (Peppermill)
For most of the 20th century, tourism and the gaming and entertainment industries have defined Reno. Today, Reno is a vibrant community that has diversified its economy to span industries such as healthcare, entrepreneurial startups, and technology. This workshop will explore micro/pilot projects that have embraced Reno's grit and fortitude while being on the forefront of innovation of service delivery. Manager Thornley will share examples of how small projects prove concept, which in turn elevates project priority and buy-in. An aggregation of marginal gains, or culmination of little 'wins', can lead to big city transformation.

Presiding HILLARY SCHIEVE
Mayor of Reno
Second Vice President, The United States Conference of Mayors Remarks DOUG THORNLEY
Manager of Reno
Title Sponsor
37 209
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
MONDAY, JUNE 6

EVENING EVENT
Block Party in Downtown Reno
4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.

The Reno of today unites its eccentric history, diverse population, and forward-thinking mindset to create a unique atmosphere that’s a joy to embrace. Join us in the heart of downtown Reno alongside some of its most distinctive features, like the original Reno arch and the crisp, cool Truckee River. Immerse yourself in the vibrant street culture that emanates from every Renoite, responsible for churning out hidden gem murals across town, legendary Burning Man art installations, and inspired performances by live painters, aerialists, musicians, and more. You’ve tasted food truck fare and enjoyed beer garden brews before but you’ve never experienced a Block Party the way Reno throws it down! Transportation: Motorcoaches will depart at 3:30 p.m. and will be on-hand to return all guests to the Peppermill throughout the evening and at the conclusion of the event.

Suggested Attire: Casual
Title Sponsor
38 210
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (WDC)
The Workforce Development Council is an affiliate organization of the United States Conference of Mayors.

FRIDAY, JUNE 3
Workforce Development Council Board/Winter Meeting
8:00 a.m. - 3:30p.m.

Location TBD

PAMELA NABORS
President/CEO
CareerSource Central Florida
WDC President
SATURDAY, JUNE 4
Workforce Development Council Winter Meeting
8:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m.

Location TBD
Title Sponsor
39 211
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22

THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS PRESIDENTS
FRANCIS X. SUAREZ, Miami, FL 2022-Present (80th)
NAN WHALEY, Dayton, OH 2021 (79th)
GREG FISCHER, Louisville, KY 2020-2021 (78th)
BRYAN K. BARNETT, Rochester Hills, MI 2019-2020 (77th)
STEPHEN K. BENJAMIN, Columbia, SC 2018-2019 (76th)
MITCHELL J. LANDRIEU, New Orleans 2017-2018 (75th)
MICK CORNETT, Oklahoma City 2016-2017 (74th)
STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, Baltimore 2015-2016 (73rd)
KEVIN JOHNSON, Sacramento 2014-2015 (72nd)
SCOTT SMITH, Mesa 2013-2014 (71st)
MICHAEL A. NUTTER, Philadelphia 2012-2013 (70th)
ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA, Los Angeles 2011-2012 (69th)
ELIZABETH B. KAUTZ, Burnsville 2009-2011 (68th)
GREG NICKELS, Seattle 2009 (67th)
MANUEL A. DIAZ, Miami 2008-2009 (66th)
DOUGLAS H. PALMER, Trenton 2006-2008 (65th)
MICHAEL A. GUIDO, Dearborn 2006 (64th)
BEVERLY O’NEILL, Long Beach 2005-2006 (63rd)
DONALD L. PLUSQUELLIC, Akron 2004-2005 (62nd)
JAMES A. GARNER, Hempstead 2003-2004 (61st)
THOMAS M. MENINO, Boston 2002-2003 (60th)
MARC H. MORIAL, New Orleans 2001-2002 (59th)
H. BRENT COLES, Boise 2000-2001 (58th)
WELLINGTON E. WEBB, Denver 1999-2000 (57th)
DEEDEE CORRADINI, Salt Lake City 1998-1999 (56th)
PAUL HELMKE, Fort Wayne 1997-1998 (55th)
RICHARD M. DALEY, Chicago 1996-1997 (54th)
NORMAN B. RICE, Seattle 1995-1996 (53rd)
VICTOR ASHE, Knoxville 1994-1995 (52nd)
JERRY E. ABRAMSON, Louisville 1993-1994 (51st)
WILLIAM J. ALTHAUS, York 1992-1993 (50th)
RAYMOND L. FLYNN, Boston 1991-1992 (49th)
ROBERT M. ISAAC, Colorado Springs 1990-1991 (48th)
KATHRYN J. WHITMIRE, Houston 1989-1990 (47th)
ARTHUR J. HOLLAND, Trenton 1988-1989 (46th)
RICHARD L. BERKLEY, Kansas City 1987-1988 (45th)
JOSEPH P. RILEY, JR., Charleston 1986-1987 (44th)
ERNEST N. MORIAL, New Orleans 1985-1986 (43rd)
HERNAN PADILLA, San Juan 1984-1985 (42nd)
RICHARD H. FULTON, Nashville 1983-1984 (41st)
COLEMAN A. YOUNG, Detroit 1982-1983 (40th)
HELEN G. BOOSALIS, Lincoln 1981-1982 (39th)
RICHARD G. HATCHER, Gary 1980-1981 (38th)
RICHARD E. CARVER, Peoria 1979-1980 (37th)
WILLIAM H. McNICHOLS, JR., Denver 1978-1979 (36th)
LEE ALEXANDER, Syracuse 1977-1978 (35th)
KENNETH A. GIBSON, Newark 1976-1977 (34th)
MOON LANDRIEU, New Orleans 1975-1976 (33rd)
JOSEPH L. ALIOTO, San Francisco 1974-1975 (32nd)
Title Sponsor
40 212
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
ROY B. MARTIN, JR., Norfolk 1973-1974 (31st)
LOUIE WELCH, Houston 1972-1973 (30th)
HENRY W. MAIER, Milwaukee 1971-1972 (29th)
JAMES H.J. TATE, Philadelphia 1970-1971 (28th)
JACK D. MALTESTER, San Leandro 1969-1970 (27th)
TERRY D. SCHRUNK, Portland, OR 1968-1969 (26th)
JOSEPH M. BARR, Pittsburgh 1967-1968 (25th)
JEROME P. CAVANAUGH, Detroit 1966-1967 (24th)
NEAL S. BLAISDELL, Honolulu 1965-1966 (23rd)
RAYMOND R. TUCKER, St. Louis 1963-1965 (22nd)
ARTHUR L. SELLAND, Fresno 1963 (21st)
RICHARD C. LEE, New Haven 1962-1963 (20th)
ANTHONY J. CELEBREEZE, Cleveland 1962 (19th)
HAYDON BURNS, Jacksonville 1961-1962 (18th)
RICHARDSON DILWORTH, Philadelphia 1960-1961 (17th)
RICHARD J. DALEY, Chicago 1959-1960 (16th)
NORRIS POULSON, Los Angeles 1958-1959 (15th)
ROBERT F. WAGNER, New York 1957-1958 (14th)
JOHN B. HYNES, Boston 1955-1957 (13th)
ELMER E. ROBINSON, San Francisco 1953-1955 (12th)
THOMAS A. BURKE, Cleveland 1953 (11th)
MARTIN H. KENNELLY, Chicago 1952-1953 (10th)
DAVID L. LAWRENCE, Pittsburgh 1950-1952 (9th)
W. COOPER GREEN, Birmingham 1949-1950 (8th)
GEORGE W. WELSH, Grand Rapids 1947-1949 (7th)
EDWARD J. KELLY, Chicago 1945-1947 (6th)
FIORELLO H. LAGUARDIA, New York 1935-1945 (5th)
DANIEL W. HOAN, Milwaukee 1934-1935 (4th)
T. SEMMES WALMSLEY, New Orleans 1933-1934 (3rd)
JAMES M. CURLEY, Boston 1933 (2nd)
FRANK MURPHY, Detroit 1933 (1st)
Title Sponsor
41 213
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22

THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS LEADERSHIP
Officers
FRANCIS X. SUAREZ, Miami, FL, President
HILLARY SCHIEVE, Reno, NV, Second Vice President
Past Presidents
BRYAN K. BARNETT, Rochester Hills, MI
GREG FISCHER, Louisville, KY
ELIZABETH B. KAUTZ, Burnsville, MN
Trustees
STEVE ADLER, Austin, TX
J. CHRISTIAN BOLLWAGE, Elizabeth, NJ
JAMES BRAINARD, Carmel, IN
LaTOYA CANTRELL, New Orleans, LA
JANE CASTOR, Tampa, FL
JOY COOPER, Hallandale Beach, FL
T.M. FRANKLIN COWNIE, Des Moines, IA
HARDIE DAVIS, JR., Augusta, GA
JORGE O. ELORZA, Providence, RI
JOHN GILES, Mesa, AZ
ANDREW GINTHER, Columbus, OH
DAVID HOLT, Oklahoma City, OK
LORI E. LIGHTFOOT, Chicago, IL
SYLVESTER TURNER, Houston, TX
Advisory Board
JUAN CARLOS “JC” BERMUDEZ, Doral, FL
MURIEL BOWSER, Washington, DC
LUKE BRONIN, Hartford, CT
SHARON WESTON BROOME, Baton Rouge, LA
PAULINE RUSSO CUTTER, San Leandro, CA
BUDDY DYER, Orlando, FL
JERRY DYER, Fresno CA
JOSEPH P. GANIM, Bridgeport, CT
ROBERT GARCIA, Long Beach, CA
LEIRION GAYLOR BAIRD, Lincoln, NE
TODD GLORIA, San Diego, CA
CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Las Vegas, NV
GERARD HUDSPETH, Denton, TX
ERIC JOHNSON, Dallas, TX
TISHAURA O. JONES, St. Louis, MO
SAM LICCARDO, San Jose, CA
LILY MEI, Fremont, CA
JON MITCHELL, New Bedford, MA
KENNETH D. MIYAGISHIMA, Las Cruces, NM
CHRISTINA MURYN, Findlay, OH
FRANK C. ORTIS, Pembroke Pines, FL
ADRIAN PERKINS, Shreveport, LA
SCOTT SINGER, Boca Raton, FL
Title Sponsor
42 214
Item # C15.

Draft Agenda of 05/10/22
LEVAR STONEY, Richmond, VA
BRIAN C. WAHLER, Piscataway, NJ
ACQUANETTA WARREN, Fontana, CA
STEVE WILLIAMS, Huntington, WV
VICTORIA WOODARDS, Tacoma, WA
CEO and Executive Director

TOM COCHRAN
Title Sponsor
43 215
Item # C15.

Travel and Training FY 21-22 Budget Tracking for Council Training/Travel Event Total Remaining Balance
$ - $ 5,000.00
$ -
Training/Travel Event Total Remaining Balance
$ 2,145.69 $ 2,854.31
1 2021 League of CA Cities Annual Conference & Expo in Sacramento from 9/22/2021 to 9/24/2021 $ 1,550.69
2 Critical Thinking and Influential Leadership - Virtual Seminar 2/9/2022 - 2/11/2022 $ 595.00
Training/Travel Event Total Remaining Balance
$ - $ 5,000.00
$ -
Training/Travel Event Total Remaining Balance
$ 1,373.40 $ 3,626.60
1 2021 Asian Pacific American Leadership Foundation 6th Annual CALNET Leadership Retreat from 11/4/2021 to 11/5/2021 $ 557.58 2 2022 Yosemite Policymakers Conference from 3/17/2022 to 3/20/2022 $ 815.82
Training/Travel Event Total Remaining Balance
$ 1,440.16 $ 3,559.84
1 2021 League of CA Cities Annual Conference & Expo in Sacramento from 9/22/2021 to 9/24/2021 $ 1,440.16
FY21-22 Amount
Expended/Estimated
Mayor Tran
Councilmember Dominguez
Councilmember Phan
Vice Mayor Montano
Councilmember Chua
FY21-22 Amount
Expended/Estimated
FY21-22 Amount
Expended/Estimated
FY21-22 Amount
Expended/Estimated
FY21-22 Amount
Expended/Estimated
ATTACHMENT 2
216
Item # C15.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Receive an Update on the Emergency Replacement of Two (2) Boilers and Install of a Temporary Heating System for the Public Works, Information Technology, and Police Department Building and Determine that the Condition Continues to Constitute an Emergency (Staff Contact: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director, 408-586- 2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Receive an update on the emergency replacement of two boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Police and Information Technology Department buildings; and (2) Determine by a four-fifths vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

Background:

Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050 and Council Resolution No. 9134, the Director of Public Works, in the case of emergency, may authorize a repair of a public facility and procure the work without giving notice for bids to let contracts. An emergency is defined as “a sudden, unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services.” Additionally, State law requires the Public Works Director, as the City official with delegated authority to take emergency action, to report any emergency authorization and the reason(s) for the authorization to the City Council not later than seven days after the action, or at its next regularly scheduled meeting if that meeting will occur not later than 14 days after the action. Further, the Public Works Director is required to report why the emergency would not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and the City Council is required to review the emergency action at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the emergency repair is completed. The City Council shall continue to review the emergency action at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated. At each review, the City Council shall determine, by a four-fifths vote, whether there is a need to continue the action.

Consistent with applicable State law and Council Resolution, on April 1, 2022, the Public Works Director authorized the City to contract with its existing HVAC maintenance contractor, Environmental Systems Inc. (ESI), for the replacement of two (2) boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Information Technology and Police Department buildings.

At the May 3 City Council meeting, the City Council received an update regarding the emergency replacement of two (2) boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Information Technology and Police Department buildings and determined that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

Analysis:

The install of the temporary heating system was completed on Friday, April 15, and is currently operational providing heat to the building. The two (2) new boilers were ordered and are expected to arrive in mid-June.

Staff is recommending that the City Council determine, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the emergency action declared by the Public Works Director. Staff will return to City Council with an update at 217
Item # C16.
every regularly scheduled City Council meeting until the emergency action is terminated. The estimated completion date for the installation of the new boilers is mid-June 2022.

Fiscal Impact:

The estimated repair and temporary heating installation cost of $208,968 will be paid from the Unanticipated Expenditure Reserve.

California Environmental Quality Act:

The emergency repair work is exempt from CEQA, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities and 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction.

Recommendations:

1. Receive an update on the emergency replacement of two (2) boilers and the installation of a temporary heating system for the Public Works, Police and Information Technology Department buildings.

2. Determine by a four-fifths vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

Attachment:

N/A
218
Item # C16.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental Assessment to allow the development of 56 townhome condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units. The residential development will consist of eight multi-family residential buildings up to 48 feet in height (four stories), with 84 vehicle parking spaces and associated site improvements on a 1.92-acre site located in the Very High-Density Mixed-Use (MXD3) Zoning District at 1752-1810 Houret Court. The Project is located within the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP) area and submitted under California Senate Bill 330 (Housing Crisis Act of 2019). (Ned Thomas, Planning Director, 408-586-3273)
Category: Public Hearings-Community Development
Meeting Date: 5/17/2022
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to approve Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035, and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004, subject to the Conditions of Approval.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Milpitas received an application from City Ventures (applicant) requesting a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental Assessment to allow the development of a 56-unit townhome condominium subdivision, comprised of eight multifamily buildings up to 48 feet in height, 84 parking spaces, and associated site improvements (Project) on a 1.92- acre site located at 1752-1810 Houret Court in the Montague Corridor Subdistrict of the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP) area. City Ventures applied under California Senate Bill 330, also known as the Housing Crisis Act of 2019.

The Project consists of 32 two-bedroom and 24 three-bedroom townhome condominium units. All 32 twobedroom units will have an attached one-car garage, and all 24 three-bedroom units will have an attached twocar garage and a ground-floor, attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). All ADUs will be studio units. Eight of the affordable townhome condominiums (four two-bedroom and four three-bedroom townhomes) will be reserved for moderate-income households (below 80% Avg. Median Income), and the applicant proposes to pay the affordable housing in-lieu fee for the remaining balance (0.4) to fully comply with the City's Affordable Housing Ordinance. Since the applicant is restricting the sale of more than 10% of the housing units to moderate-income residents, the Project qualifies for concessions, waivers, and parking reductions under the State Density Bonus Law.

The proposed Project requires approval of five entitlements, as follows:

1. Site Development Permit No. SD21-0004: To allow the development of eight multi-family buildings, up to four stories in height, with up to 56 townhouse condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units on the

1.92-acre site; and

2. Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006: To allow for condominium use and associated subdivision; and

3. Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002: To establish 56 residential condominium spaces, related common areas, and associated easements; and
219
Item # 17.

4. Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001: To ensure compliance with State Density Bonus law and regulations; and

5. Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035: To remove 17 ordinance-sized trees and replace them with 50 new trees.

Although not an entitlement, Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 was prepared to establish CEQA compliance.

California Senate Bill 330 (SB 330) is a statewide bill intended to reduce the time to approve housing developments in California. It became effective on January 1, 2020, and Senate Bill 8 (SB 8) recently extended the Act through January 1, 2030. Under SB 330, eligible projects receive enhanced streamlining and vesting opportunities by filing a preliminary application. Those benefits include:
• Freezes the ability of local governments to downzone, adopt new development standards, or change land use in residential and mixed-use areas if the change results in less-intensive uses. • Allows developers to request approval of housing developments that exceed density and design controls of the underlying zoning if the existing zoning conflicts with the General Plan or a Specific Plan. • Expedites the permitting process for all housing development and limits the list of application materials that cities can review.

Through the Housing Accountability Act, the state requires a local jurisdiction to approve housing consistent with applicable, objective land use standards. Under the State Density Bonus Law, the state also requires a local jurisdiction to approve waivers and concessions for projects that meet certain affordability requirements.

Consistent with state law, planning staff has determined that the Project is consistent with applicable, objective land use standards as provided under SB 330 and meets the requirements for waivers and incentives/concessions under the State Density Bonus Law. A local government agency can deny an eligible housing project only if there is strong evidence that denial is the only way to avoid an adverse impact on public health and safety.

On April 27, 2022, the City of Milpitas Planning Commission unanimously (six ayes, one absent) approved Resolution No. 22-005 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Project, subject to the Conditions of approval.

Staff has found that the required entitlements comply with the policies, standards, and processes established in the City of Milpitas 2040 General Plan, the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP), the Zoning Ordinance, the Subdivision Ordinance, other provisions of the Milpitas Municipal Code (MMC), Senate Bill 330, and the State Density Bonus Law and recommends that the City Council open and close the public hearing, consider the exemptions in accordance with CEQA, and adopt the Resolution subject to the conditions of approval.

ANALYSIS:

This analysis will evaluate elements of the proposed Project for conformance with the Milpitas 2040 General Plan, the 2008 Transit Area Specific Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and other provisions of the Milpitas Municipal Code, Senate Bill 330, and State Density Bonus Law.

Milpitas 2040 General Plan Conformance
The General Plan designation for the project site is Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (MMSP), but since City Council has not yet formally adopted the MMSP, the TASP development standards currently apply. The MMSP and TASP standards intend to facilitate the development of higher intensity, mixed-use neighborhoods near the Milpitas Transit Center and encourage walking, biking, and alternative modes of transportation for residents and employees in the immediate area.

The Project is in conformance with the applicable policies and standards in the City's General Plan, as outlined in Table 1 on the following page.
220
Item # 17.

Table 1: General Plan Consistency
Policy Conformance
Policy LU 1-4: Continue to provide for a
variety of housing types and densities that
meet the needs of individuals and families
and offer residents of all income levels, age
groups, and special needs sufficient housing
opportunities and choices for locating in
Milpitas.

Consistent. The Project provides townhome condominiums
and accessory dwelling units. This variety of housing types will meet the needs of individuals, families, and residents of all demographics and income levels and is marketed
specifically to young families with mixed incomes.

Policy CD 6-5: Promote consistent
development patterns along streets
particularly by how buildings relate to the
street, to promote a sense of visual order,
and provide attractive streetscapes.

Consistent. The Project is consistent with applicable design standards in the TASP and continues the existing
contemporary architectural styles along Montague
Expressway. The proposed building heights, up to 48 feet, are consistent with adjacent townhome developments, and buildings facing Montague Expressway have front doors that open onto landscaped open space along the street frontage.

In addition, the site plan includes separated sidewalks, small front yards, and mature trees along the perimeter. The
addition of second and fourth-floor patios, dark metal awnings and windows, and a combination of stucco and horizontal paneling along the front elevation provide consistency with the Ellison Park Development to the east and an attractive streetscape along Montague Expressway.

Policy LU 5-3: Ensure new development is
consistent with specific height limits
established within the City's Zoning
Ordinance as applied through the zoning
district for all properties within the City.

Consistent. The Project meets the height standards by
proposing four-story buildings, up to 48 feet in height, in a zoning district that allows a maximum height of 150 feet. The Project's height is consistent with the Ellison Park
Development, which has buildings up to 50 feet in height.

Transit Area Specific Plan Conformance
The TASP land use designation for the Project is Very High-Density Mixed-Use. This designation provides for high-density residential uses within the Montague Corridor Subdistrict. As demonstrated in Table 2, the Project is consistent with the applicable TASP land use policies.

Table 2: TASP Consistency
Policy Conformance
Policy 3.4: Provide a variety of housing types for
different types of households, different income
levels, different age groups, and different lifestyles.

Consistent. The Project provides townhome
condominiums and accessory dwelling units. This variety of housing types will meet the needs of individuals,
families, and residents of all demographics or income
levels and is marketed specifically to young families with mixed incomes.

Policy 4.2 (MON): New curb cuts and auto access
onto Montague Expressway are strongly
discouraged, unless specifically indicated on the
Plan map
Consistent. The Project does not include any new curb
cuts or access driveways onto Montague Expressway.

Vehicular access to the site is provided by two driveways with access from the existing Houret Court right-of-way. 221
Item # 17.

Policy Conformance
Policy 3.3: Affordable housing should be
integrated into all residential projects.

Consistent. The Project will provide affordable housing through inclusion and design. The applicant will restrict eight residential units for sale to moderate-income
individuals or households and integrate accessory
dwelling units into 24 townhome condominiums,
providing options in housing.

Policy 4.3 (MON): Parcels fronting Montague
Expressway are permitted to contain residential,
employment, or hotel uses.

Consistent. The Project includes residential uses
fronting onto Montague Expressway.

Policy 4.5 (MON): New development along
Montague Expressway must dedicate land, such
that a total of 79 feet from the roadway centerline
is provided, to accommodate the future Montague
Expressway widening project.

Consistent. The applicant will dedicate 0.33 acres of
land to local agencies to accommodate the future
expansion of Montague Expressway. Due to land
dedication, the site area will be reduced from 2.25 acres to 1.91 acres.

Zoning Conformance
The project site is in the MXD3 Very High-Density Mixed-Use Zoning District. As demonstrated in Tables 3 and 4, the Project complies with most of the objective standards for the MXD3 Zoning District and TASP/MMSP area.

Where the project does not meet the objective standard, the State Density Bonus Law requires the City to grant appropriate concessions, waivers, and parking reductions allow the standard to be met.

Table 3: Summary of MXD3 Zoning District
Development
Standard
(MXD3)
Required Proposed Conformance
Density 41-60 dwelling units (du) /
gross acre (ac) 41.67 du/ac Yes
Front yard
Setback 45 feet at Major Street 34 feet Yes
(with approval of a Density Bonus waiver)
Other Street
Facing Yard
Setback
12 feet (min.)
20 feet (max.)
from the back of sidewalk
12 feet Yes
Side Yard
Setback
10 feet
15 feet when abutting
residential use
20 feet Yes
Rear Yard
Setback
20 feet over three stories
when abutting residential
use
10 feet Yes
(with approve of a Density Bonus waiver)
Height 12 stories (or 150 feet) Four Stories
(47.5 feet) Yes
222
Item # 17.

In addition, projects located in the TASP area must comply with the additional development and design standards outlined in Table 4:

Table 4: Additional Development Standards Applicable in the TASP Standard Proposed Conformance
Projections into
Required Yards
Porches, stairs, balconies,
bay windows, and awnings
may project up to six feet into
required setbacks.

None Yes
Building
Orientation and
Entrances
Building must face the street,
and primary building
entrances must be oriented
toward the street.

Buildings face
Montague
Expressway, which
is the Project's
primary street
frontage.

Yes
Vehicle Parking
Two-Bedroom – 51 spaces
Three-Bedroom – 38 spaces
Guest Parking – 18 spaces
Total – 107 spaces
(89 covered, 18 uncovered)
84 spaces
(80 covered, four
uncovered)
Yes
(with approval of a Density
Bonus waiver)
Bicycle Parking
On-street guest racks
equivalent to five percent
(5%) of the parking
requirement.

Five bicycle parking spaces
Six bicycle parking
spaces
Yes
Parking Location
Parking must be located so
that it is not visible from the
street.
56 private garage
entrances face the
interior drive aisle
Yes
Parking Garages
attached to
individual units
Garages may not occupy
more than 50% of Ground
Level Frontage facing street.

No parking garage
is facing the street
frontage.

Yes
Parking Access
and Curb Cuts
Maximum two curb cuts per
lot per street frontage
One curb cut along
Houret Court Yes
Park Acreage
Requirements

0.09 acres (after payment of
TASP/MMSP fee) 0.42 acres Yes
223
Item # 17.

State Density Bonus Law
To encourage affordable housing production, the State Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code § 65915 et seq.) allows developers to receive a density bonus and other incentives, such as concessions, waivers, and parking reductions, when affordable housing is incorporated within a project. The Density Bonus is a state mandate, and any Project that meets the requirements of the state law is entitled to receive the incentives associated with it.

The applicant may request waivers and concessions under the State Density Bonus Law because the Project reserves more than 10 percent of total units as affordable units for moderate-income households. The Project includes eight affordable units, which is just under the 15 percent total units required under the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance, and the applicant proposes to pay in-lieu fees for the remaining 0.4 units. The City must grant any waivers and concessions requested by the applicant for a qualifying project under the State Density Bonus Law. Table 5 outlines the waivers and parking reductions requested for the proposed Project.

Table 5: State Density Bonus – Concessions, Waivers, and Incentives Type of
Modification Standard Applicant Request Justification Discretion Setback
Waiver
Front and rear
yard setbacks
A request to reduce
the front yard
setback from 35 feet
to 24 feet and the
rear yard setback
from 15 feet to 10
feet.

Due to the 0.33-acre
reduction in the overall site
area to accommodate future
widening of Montague
Expressway, the applicant
requests a reduction in the
required front setback to
meet the minimum density
requirement in the R-3
zone.

This waiver is
allowed under State
Density Bonus Law
and must be granted
by the City.

Parking
Waiver
Vehicle
Parking
Reduction
To provide 84 vehicle
parking spaces when
107 vehicle parking
spaces are required
The affordability provisions
of the State Density Bonus
Law allow a reduction in
minimum parking
requirements for qualifying
projects
A waiver of minimum
parking standards is
allowed under State
Density Bonus Law
and must be granted
by the City
Setback Areas Waivers
MXD3 zoning standards require a 45-foot setback from a major arterial, such as Montague Expressway (Montague), and a 15-foot setback for the rear yard (facing Houret Court). However, the applicant has proposed a 34-foot setback at Montague and a ten-foot setback at the rear. The setback encroachments are due to the reduction of site area to accommodate future widening of Montague Expressway along the entire frontage of the project.

Per City of Milpitas and Santa Clara County standards, new development along Montague Expressway must dedicate land for right-of-way to accommodate the future Montague Expressway widening project. For this project, the applicant must dedicate approximately 0.30 acres to Santa Clara County along the project’s Montague frontage, reducing the depth of the site by 29 feet and lessening the buildable area. This dedicated land will allow Santa Clara County to widen Montague Expressway, which will be paid for with funds from Measure B, a 30-year, half-cent countywide sales tax devoted to enhancing transit, highways, expressways, and active transportation (bicycles, pedestrians, and complete streets) within Santa Clara County.

Parking Incentives
Under the State Density Bonus Law, an applicant who qualifies for a density bonus may propose reduced parking standards. Projects located in the TASP area typically require 1.6 to 2.0 vehicle parking spaces for each twoand three-bedroom unit. The project must also provide an additional 20% vehicle parking for guests. However, under State Density Bonus Law and upon a developer's request, the City must allow a reduction in vehicle parking, as shown in Table 6.
224
Item # 17.

Table 6: Maximum Parking Requirements (under State Density Bonus Law) Type of Unit (or Guest Parking) Number of Vehicle Parking Spaces Accessory Dwelling Units Zero space (if within one-half mile of walking distance of public transit)
Studio and One Bedroom One space
Two-Bedroom and Three-Bedroom 1.5 spaces
Four-Bedroom 2.5 spaces
Guest Parking Zero spaces
The applicant has requested reduced parking standards and has proposed to provide the following, as demonstrated in Table 7.

Table 7: Parking Analysis (under State Density Bonus Law) Land Use Unit
Count Rate SpacesRequired
Spaces
Provided Notes
Two-bedroom 32 1.5 / unit 48 32
Three- bedroom 24 1.5 / unit 36 48
ADU 24 0 / unit 0 0
Guest Parking N/A 0 4
Included as part of the total number
of parking spaces required under
the State Density Bonus Law
Total: 84 84
As noted in the Background, each two-bedroom unit will include a single-car garage, and each three-bedroom unit will include a two-car garage. In addition, four additional surface parking spaces will be provided for guests near the vehicle access (from Houret Court), making a total of 84 vehicle spaces and consistent with the reduced parking standard under the State Density Bonus Law.

Subdivision Ordinance
The Project's form, content, and dedications of the proposed vesting tract map have been reviewed by the City of Milpitas Engineering Department and deemed consistent with the provisions of MMC Section XI-1-4 (Tentative Maps), as outlined in the Resolution.

Architectural Design
The Project's design concept includes four-story building heights consistent with existing and planned residential development along Montague Expressway. The contemporary design includes the following design accents and materials:
 Roof: Parapet
 Exterior: Stucco Finish with Fiber Cement Siding
 Accents: Metal Awnings, Board Form, and Metal Railings  Window/Door Trim: Fiber Cement Trim
 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door
 Garage Door: Sectional Garage Door
225
Item # 17.

The Project conforms to the Transit Area Specific Plan design guidelines, which require orientation of the building to the street, well-articulated exterior walls with consistent style and materials, muted colors for primary building walls with richer accent colors, and integrated parking. Furthermore, the Project has a similar architectural style to the Ellison Park development located across the street from Houret Drive. A rendering of the Project is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – Proposed Project Facing South towards Montague Expressway The applicant has provided an exhibit with proposed colors and materials for review by City staff and the City Council, as demonstrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – Colors/Materials
Tree Removal and Landscaping Requirements
The Project includes the removal of 17 ordinance-size trees to accommodate the construction of the public frontage improvements. Per the City's Tree Maintenance and Protection Ordinance, the Project proposes planting up to 50 replacement trees in various areas across the site. Other new landscaping will include various shrubs, grasses, and vines (New Zealand Flax, Indian Hawthorn, Coast Rosemary, and Creeping Fig). In addition, the applicant will install decorative paving in the alleyways of the private streets. The perimeter landscape area includes trees, shrubs, grasses, and a dog park with benches, as shown in Figure 3 below. 226
Item # 17.

Figure 3 – Landscape Plan
Parkland and Open Space Requirements
The TASP requires all new developments to provide 3.5 acres of parkland for every 1,000 persons or payment of park in-lieu fees, as allowed by MMC Section XI-1-9 (Improvements: Dedication of Land or Payment of Fee or Both, for Recreational Purposes). The Parkland Fee is based upon the estimated number of persons expected to reside in the development (per U.S. Census definitions) and the estimated value of parkland in the City of Milpitas (currently $2,787,840 per acre).

The City estimates 2.49 people will occupy each unit. The Project proposes 56 units, resulting in an estimated population of 139 persons. Based on this population estimate, the applicant must provide 0.49 acres of parkland, equivalent to approximately $1,360,577.

All projects in the TASP area are required to pay a Transit Area Development Impact Fee (TADIF). A portion of that fee pays for parkland. The park portion of the TASP fee for this project is valued at $1,108,688, equivalent to 0.40 acres of parkland. This amount will be applied to the Project's parkland requirement, leaving a delta of

0.09 acres to be satisfied.

To satisfy the 0.09-acre delta, the applicant has incorporated 0.42 acres as private recreation space on-site, as permitted by MMC Section XI-1-9. For example, each townhome has private balconies totaling 10,600 square feet. In addition, the Project includes an additional 7,820 square feet of on-site public open space, including a dog park with benches. The parkland requirement is met by designing these elements into the project, as demonstrated in Table 8 below.
227
Item # 17.

Table 8: Parkland Requirement Analysis
City Ventures Townhomes Proposed 56
City Ventures Townhomes Population Estimate
(2.49 persons/unit per Census) 139 persons
TASP Parkland Requirement 3.5 acres/1,000 people or equivalent fees-in-lieu
Total Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Fee Required 0.49 acres / $1,360,577 Amount Satisfied Through TASP Fees (Acreage/Dollars) 0.40 acres / $1,108,688 Remaining Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Fee Required 0.09 acres / $251,889 Private Recreation/Open Space Included in the Project 0.42 acres Balance of Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Feed Due 0.00 acres / $0 Accessory Dwelling Units
The Project includes 24 attached ADUs located on the ground floor of each three-bedroom townhome condominium. Each integrated ADU is designed as a studio unit with a living/sleeping area, bathroom, kitchenette, and separate front door entrance, as shown in Figure 4 below.

Figure 4 – Townhome/ADU Front Entry
228
Item # 17.

Although the proposed ADUs are considered residential units for density purposes, their integral design limits the City’s ability to charge development fees (such as TADIF or Park-In Lieu Fees). Per Government Code Section 65852.2. (f)(3)(A), A local agency, special district, or water corporation shall not impose any impact fee upon the development of an accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet. The proposed ADUs will be approximately 280 square feet in size and thus qualify for the impact fee exception under State law.

Affordable Housing Ordinance
According to MMC Section XII-1-3.00 (Affordable Housing), the applicant must reserve fifteen percent (15%) of the total number of dwelling units within the development as affordable units. The applicant proposes to meet the City’s affordable housing requirement by reserving eight units on-site for moderate-income households and paying a partial in-lieu fee, as demonstrated in Table 9, which approximates the required fee.

Table 9: Parkland Requirements Analysis
City Ventures Townhomes Proposed 56
Number of Below-Market-Rate Townhomes Required (15% of 56) 8.4 Number of Townhomes proposed as Affordable 8.0
Remaining Affordable Requirement 0.4
Affordable Housing in-lieu fee to be paid by City Ventures $161,503 Traffic and Access
Vehicular access to the project site will be provided via two driveways with direct ingress/egress from Houret Court. An internal private street grid will provide access to 56 private residential garages with a total of 80 vehicle parking spaces. In addition, four guest parking spaces will be provided next to the access driveway, including one ADA-compliant space and one electric vehicle (EV) parking space. The EV parking space will provide full charging facilities.

Grading
The proposed Project would result in the demolition of all existing structures, paving, and landscaping on the subject site. In addition, the applicant would import 500 cubic yards of fill to pad the site and increase the finish grade heights to meet flood zone requirements.

Utilities
The project site is located in an urban area and is currently served by existing utilities, including water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure. All public utilities will be provided to the Project site.

Climate Action Plan
The City of Milpitas Climate Action Plan (CAP) was adopted in 2013 and included Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction goals, policies, and actions for new and existing development projects. The Project would follow these goals and policies by locating future residents near public transportation, jobs, restaurants, and services. In addition, the Project would incorporate green building measures in compliance with CAL Green standard building measures for residential buildings and Title 24 requirements to reduce energy usage. 229
Item # 17.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Deny the applicant’s request for a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental Assessment.

Pros: Denial of the Project would allow the site to remain legal non-conforming industrial uses, with the possibility a higher density residential project would be submitted. A higher density project would generate more impact fees to pay for needed infrastructure.

Cons: Denial of the Project would deprive the City of 80 new residential units, eight of which are reserved for moderate-income households. The Project would further support affordable housing needs within the region, including the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Denial of the project would also be contrary to the goals and objectives of State and local density bonus laws.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City Council has expressed support for the development of affordable housing within proximity to transit. The Project includes eight townhomes reserved for moderate-income households, and 24 attached accessory dwelling units, which are designed with affordability in mind, increasing the number of affordable units in the City of Milpitas and providing more options of housing for its residents. The project meets the City’s development regulations and complies with the affordability provisions of the State Density Bonus Law for the waivers and parking reductions requested by the applicant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Project is subject to the following impact fees:
 TASP (TADIF) Impact Fee - The TASP impact fee is currently set at $44,009/unit for residential uses for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Based on the development of 56 residential units, the estimated TASP impact fee for this Project is $2,464,504 ($44,009/unit x 56 units). This fee is automatically adjusted each fiscal year in conjunction with the City's annual budget process. The applicant must pay the fee before the issuance of building permits.
 Parkland Impact Fee - A portion of the TASP impact fee includes a portion of the parkland in-lieu fee.

Therefore, by paying the TASP impact fee and developing 0.42 acres of public and private open space, the applicant will meet the parkland fee requirement without paying additional parkland fees.  Public Art Fee - The Project will comply with the City's Public Art Requirements for Private Development, as set forth in Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-14. This fee is currently set at onehalf of one percent of building development costs. The proposed Project will pay the fee based on the construction valuation at the building permit issuance.  Affordable Housing Fee - The Project includes eight (8) affordable units (15%) and will pay any remaining fees into the Affordable Housing Fund in compliance with the Affordable Housing Ordinance.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

The proposed Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15195 (Residential Infill Exemption) in that the project site is no more than four acres in size, consists of a residential development on an infill site and located less than one-half mile of a major transit stop, is less than 100 units, and promotes higher density infill housing by utilizing attached accessory dwelling units within the Project. The Project also includes the availability of affordable units by providing more than ten percent (10%) of the housing to be sold to families of moderate income. Furthermore, there is no reasonable possibility the project will have a significant effect on the existing environment because no substantial changes with respect to residential infill in the immediate area have occurred since community-level environmental review was certified (June 3, 2008), and no new information has become available regarding any residential infill project has become known, and could not have been known at the time that community-level environmental review was certified and adopted.

As a separate and independent basis, the Project is also exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 (Program EIR), Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), and Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning). 230
Item # 17.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution to approve Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21- 0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035, and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004, subject to the Conditions of Approval.

Attachment(s):

1. City Council Resolution (with CEQA exemption memorandum)

2. Planning Commission Staff report (dated April 27, 2022)

3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for April 27, 2022

4. Project Plans
231
Item # 17.
1 Resolution No. ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. SD21-0012, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. UP21-0006, VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. MT21-0002, DENSITY BONUS PERMIT NO. DB21-0001, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TR21-0035, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA21-0004 TO ALLOW DEMOLITION OF TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 17 ORDINANCE-SIZE TREES, AND DEVELOPMENT OF 56 TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS AND 24 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, CONSISTING OF EIGHT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS UP TO 48 FEET IN HEIGHT (FOUR STORIES), WITH 84 VEHICLE PARKING SPACES AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON A 1.92-

ACRE SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE TRANSIT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN / MILPITAS METRO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AT 1752-1810 HOURET COURT (APN 086-41-010,011) AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CEQA

EXEMPTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, title 14, § 15000 et seq.) (collectively, “CEQA”), the City of Milpitas is the lead agency for the proposed project described below; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2008, the City Council of the City of Milpitas certified an Environmental Impact Report prepared to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Transit Area Specific Plan (the “EIR,” State Clearinghouse No. 2006032091), and subsequently adopted the Transit Area Specific Plan (the “TASP”); and WHEREAS, the Transit Area Specific Plan encompasses some 437 acres and envisions the development of 7,109 dwelling units, 287,075 square feet of retail space, and 993,843 square feet of office space and industrial, and includes development standards, goals and policies guiding development within the Plan area. Due to the physical characteristics of the area, including major streets, railroads and creeks, the Transit Area Specific Plan also established sub-districts with specific goals and policies to accommodate those unique characteristics; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2021, City Ventures (the “Applicant”) submitted an application to the City of Milpitas for the entitlements necessary to allow the development of a 56-unit townhome condominium subdivision, comprised of eight multi-family buildings up to 48 feet in height, 84 parking spaces, and associated site improvements on a 1.92-acre site located at 1752-1810 Houret Court in the Montague Corridor Subdistrict of the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP) area (the “Project”). The Project requires approvals of the following entitlements:
a. Site Development Permit (SD21-0004) to allow the development of eight multi-family buildings, up to four stories in height, with up to 56 townhouse condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units on the 1.92-acre site. b. Conditional Use Permit (UP21-0006) to allow for condominium use and associated subdivision. c. Vesting Tentative Map (MT21-0002) to establish 56 residential condominium spaces, related common areas, and associated easements.
d. Density Bonus Permit (DB21-0001) to ensure compliance with State Density Bonus law and regulations. e. Tree Removal Permit (TR21-0035) to remove 17 ordinance-sized trees and replace them with 50 new trees.

WHEREAS, the Planning Department completed Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 for the Project in accordance with CEQA, and recommends that the City Council determine this Project is covered under CEQA Guidelines Section 15195 (Residential Infill Exemption) as discussed within a memorandum (the “Memorandum,” a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 2); and WHEREAS, the Project site is located within the TASP area and is therefore further exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning); 232
Item # 17.
2 Resolution No. ______
CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Residential Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan); and CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 (Program EIR); and
WHEREAS, the proposed Project is found to be consistent with the goals, policies, and regulations of the California Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915 et seq.), Milpitas General Plan 2040, Transit Area Specific Plan (Milpitas Metro Specific Plan) and Milpitas Zoning Ordinance, specifically Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-54.15 (Density Bonus for Affordable Housing Developments), which permits concessions and waivers and modifications of development standards, as analyzed and documented in the staff report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council pursuant to Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-64.03 (Consideration of Concurrent Applications), where, as here, due to the application for a Tentative Map pursuant to Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-1-4.03 and a density bonus pursuant to Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-54.15, the City Council is the highest review authority for the Project, and, accordingly, all review by other bodies with approval authority over the application shall be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, during which meeting the Planning Commission considered the CEQA exemption findings as well as Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21- 0001Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035 and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 for 1752-1810 Houret Court, heard a presentation from staff, and had the opportunity to hear from members of the public and closed the public hearing on the item; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of Resolution No. 22-005, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map No.

MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035 and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 for 1752-1810 Houret Court; and
WHEREAS, the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council bases the recommendation and the findings contained within this Resolution are available and may be reviewed at Milpitas City Hall, located at 455 E. Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, California 95035; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing, during which meeting the City Council considered the CEQA exemption findings as well as Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035 and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 for 1752-1810 Houret Court, heard a presentation from staff, and had the opportunity hear from members of the public; and WHEREAS, the findings and conclusions made by the City Council pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence before it as a whole; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals
The City Council has considered the full record before it, which includes, but is not limited to, such things as all published staff reports, oral and written testimony by staff, the Planning Commission, City Council and the public, and all other relevant materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
233
Item # 17.
3 Resolution No. ______
SECTION 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings The proposed Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15195 (Residential Infill Exemption) in that the project site is no more than four acres in size, consists of a residential development on an infill site and located less than one-half mile of a major transit stop, is less than 100 units, and promotes higher density infill housing by utilizing attached accessory dwelling units within the project, and includes the availability of affordable units by providing more than ten percent (10%) of the housing to be sold to families of moderate income. Furthermore, there is no reasonable possibility the project will have a significant effect on the existing environment due to unusual circumstances, no substantial changes with respect to residential infill in the immediate area have occurred since community-level environmental review was certified (June 3, 2008), and no new information has become available regarding any residential infill project has become known, and could not have been known at the time that community-level environmental review was certified and adopted. As a separate and independent basis, the Project is also exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 (Program EIR), Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), and Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning).

SECTION 3. Vesting Tentative Map Findings (Section XI-1-20.01) The City Council makes the following findings based on the evidence in the administrative record in support of Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002:
a. The tentative subdivision map is consistent with the General Plan.

The General Plan designation for the project site references MMSP, but since the City Council has not formally adopted the MMSP, the TASP development standards currently apply. Both the MMSP and TASP standards intend to facilitate the development of higher intensity, mixed-use neighborhoods near the Milpitas Transit Center and encourage walking, biking, and alternative modes of transportation.

The TASP designates this project site as Boulevard Very High-Density Mixed-Use. This classification provides high-density housing, retail, and employment along Montague Expressway with a landscaped boulevard character.

Projects may include a wholly residential or non-residential concept or a project that integrates residential and nonresidential uses vertically or horizontally and permits densities between 41 – 90 units per acre.

As this Project is a wholly residential development and proposes 41.67 dwelling units/acre, it is consistent with the intended land use of the General Plan and the relevant density requirement. In addition, the Housing Element does not identify the project site for yielding affordable housing units. Therefore, there is no net loss of affordable housing opportunities.

Furthermore, the Project is consistent with the Milpitas General Plan, as demonstrated and outlined in Table 1, below:

Table 1: General Plan Consistency
Policy Conformance
Policy LU 1-4: Continue to provide for a variety of
housing types and densities that meet the needs of
individuals and families and offer residents of all
income levels, age groups, and special needs
sufficient housing opportunities and choices for
locating in Milpitas.

Consistent. The Project provides townhome
condominiums and accessory dwelling units. This
variety of housing types will meet the needs of
individuals, families, and residents of all demographics and income levels and is marketed specifically to
young families with mixed incomes.
234
Item # 17.
4 Resolution No. ______
Policy Conformance
Policy CD 6-5: Promote consistent development
patterns along streets particularly by how buildings
relate to the street, to promote a sense of visual order, and provide attractive streetscapes.

Consistent. The Project is consistent with applicable
design standards in the TASP and continues the
existing contemporary architectural styles along
Montague Expressway. The proposed building
heights, up to 48 feet, are consistent with adjacent
townhome developments, and buildings facing
Montague Expressway have front doors that open onto
landscaped open space along the street frontage. In
addition, the site plan includes separated sidewalks,
small front yards, and mature trees along the perimeter.

The addition of second and fourth-floor patios, dark
metal awnings and windows, and a combination of
stucco and horizontal paneling along the front
elevation provide consistency with the Ellison Park
Development to the east and an attractive streetscape
along Montague Expressway.

Policy LU 5-3: Ensure new development is consistent
with specific height limits established within the City's Zoning Ordinance as applied through the zoning
district for all properties within the City.

Consistent. The Project meets the height standards by
proposing four-story buildings, up to 48 feet in height, in a zoning district that allows a maximum height of
150 feet. The Project's height is consistent with the
Ellison Park Development, which has buildings up to
50 feet in height.
b. None of the conditions identified in California Government Code Section 66474 exist, to wit:

A. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Government Code Section 65451.

As outlined above, the Project includes the development of 56 residential condominium units at a density of 41.67 dwelling units/acre. The General Plan and MMSP/TASP land use designation is Boulevard HighDensity Mixed Use, which permits residential development at 41 to 90 dwelling units/acre densities. The Project is therefore consistent with the general and corresponding specific plans.

B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The Project proposes 41.67 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the 41 – 90 dwelling units per acre allowed by the general plan and corresponding specific plans. Additionally, the Project is consistent with the policies associated with the MMSP/TASP, as identified in Tables 3 and 5, except for vehicle parking, which is allowed per State Density Bonus Law.

C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

The site is surrounded by high-density, transit-oriented residential development under the City's General Plan. The zoning designation under the MMSP/TASP permits wholly residential development at the project site. In addition, this site is suitable for higher density development based on the location, physical attributes, existing infrastructure, and proposed improvements. Lastly, the site is relatively flat and has direct access to an adjacent public right-of-way (Houret Court) to accommodate the proposed type of development.
235
Item # 17.
5 Resolution No. ______
D. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The project site is within the MMSP/TASP specific plan designation of Boulevard High-Density MixedUse, permitting residential development at 41 to 90 dwelling units/acre. The design will physically suit the site by providing required utilities, sufficient open space, and adequate residential living facilities.

E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The Project, including the subdivision and its associated improvements, is located in an urbanized area and was previously developed as two industrial buildings. Therefore, it will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

F. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

The Project, including the subdivision and its associated improvements, has been designed in a manner that will not cause serious public health problems. The Project has been reviewed by Building, Fire, Land Development, Traffic, Water, and Solid Waste Departments. As a result, it has been determined that it can be adequately serviced to preserve public health and wellness.

G. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The Project is located on a private property site and has been designed to not conflict with any easements required by the public. In addition, the applicant will dedicate portions of the property to Santa Clara County Roads and Airports and the City of Milpitas to allow Montague Expressway widening. Furthermore, the City will require a partial vacation of a portion of the Houret Court cul-de-sac to the north to remain consistent with the MMSP/TASP future roadway network.

SECTION 4. Site Development Permit Findings (Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-57.03(F)) The City Council makes the following findings based on the evidence in the public record in support of Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012:
a. The layout of the site and design of the proposed buildings, structures and landscaping are compatible and aesthetically harmonious with adjacent and surrounding development.

The Project’s site layout and design of the proposed units are consistent with the modern, multi-story townhomes surrounding the project site, such as the Ellison Park, Paragon, and Harmony residential developments. The contemporary designs of the buildings include flat top roofs with full parapets, dark metal canopies, stucco, horizontal siding, integrated gutters and downspouts, and vinyl windows with vertical and horizontal mullions.

Colors are earth tone shades of browns and grays with portions of yellow stucco. The units will be accessed by entry doors that face public rights-of-way. In addition, future residents will access garages via private alleyways, similar to nearby residential developments.
b. The Project is consistent with the Milpitas Zoning Ordinance.

The proposed multi-family residential building is permitted in the MXD3 Very High-Density Mixed-Use Zoning District. The project design conforms to the site and development standards of the MXD3 zone.

The Project also conforms to MMC Section XI-10-54.015 (Density Bonus for Affordable Housing Developments) and XI-10-57.05 (Density Bonus Permits). Where exceptions from the MXD3 standards are needed, the applicant has requested waivers and parking exceptions under the State Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code § 65915 et seq.). The requested waivers and parking exception will support the development of affordable housing on a site where it 236
Item # 17.
6 Resolution No. ______
would not otherwise be possible through a strict application of the specified standard. The proposed Project is consistent with the Milpitas Zoning Ordinance, as demonstrated in Table 2, below.

Table 2: Summary of MXD3 Zoning District
Development
Standard
(MXD3)
Required Proposed Conformance
Density 41-60 dwelling units (du) /
gross acre (ac) 41.67 du/ac Yes
Front yard
Setback 45 feet at Major Street 30-34 feet
No (Yes, with approval of a Density Bonus
waiver)
Other Street
Facing Yard
Setback
12 feet (min.) - 20 feet (max.)
from the back of the sidewalk 12 feet Yes
Side Yard
Setback
10 foot, 15 foot when abutting
residential use 20 feet Yes
Rear Yard
Setback 20 feet over three stories when
abutting residential use 10 feet No (Yes, with approve of a Density Bonus waiver) Height 12 stories (or 150 feet) Four Stories
(47.5 feet) Yes
c. The Project is consistent with the General Plan.

The proposed Project is consistent with the Milpitas General Plan, as demonstrated and outlined in Table 1, above. d. The Project is consistent with the Transit Area Specific Plan (Milpitas Metro Specific Plan).

The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable policies and design guidelines of the TASP/MMSP, as demonstrated in Tables 3 and 4, below.

Table 3: TASP/MMSP Consistency
Policy Conformance
Policy 3.4: Provide a variety of housing types
for different types of households, different
income levels, different age groups, and
different lifestyles.

Consistent. The Project provides townhome condominiums
and accessory dwelling units. This variety of housing types will meet the needs of individuals, families, and residents of all demographics or income levels and is marketed specifically to young families with mixed incomes.
237
Item # 17.
7 Resolution No. ______
Policy Conformance
Policy 4.2 (MON): New curb cuts and auto
access onto Montague Expressway are
strongly discouraged, unless specifically
indicated on the Plan map
Consistent. The Project does not include any new curb cuts or access driveways onto Montague Expressway. Vehicular
access to the site is provided by two driveways with access from the existing Houret Court right-of-way.

Policy 3.3: Affordable housing should be
integrated into all residential projects.

Consistent. The Project will provide affordable housing through inclusion and design. The applicant will restrict eight residential units for sale to moderate-income individuals or households and integrate accessory dwelling units into 24 townhome condominiums, providing options in housing.

Policy 4.3 (MON): Parcels fronting Montague
Expressway are permitted to contain
residential, employment, or hotel uses.

Consistent. The Project includes residential uses fronting onto Montague Expressway.

Policy 4.5 (MON): New development along
Montague Expressway must dedicate land,
such that a total of 79 feet from the roadway
centerline is provided, to accommodate the
future Montague Expressway widening
project.

Consistent. The applicant will dedicate 0.33 acres of land to local agencies to accommodate the future expansion of
Montague Expressway. Due to land dedication, the site area will be reduced from 2.25 acres to 1.91 acres.

Table 4: Additional Development Standards Applicable in the TASP/MMSP Standard Proposed Conformance
Projections into
Required Yards
Porches, stairs, balconies,
bay windows, and awnings
may project up to six feet
into required setbacks.

None Yes
Building
Orientation and
Entrances
Building must face the
street, and primary building
entrances must be oriented
toward the street.

Buildings face Montague
Expressway, which is the
Project's primary street
frontage.

Yes
Vehicle Parking
Two-Bedroom – 51 spaces
Three-Bedroom – 38 spaces
Guest Parking – 18 spaces
Total – 107 spaces
(89 covered, 18 uncovered)
84 spaces
(80 covered, four
uncovered)
No (Yes, with approval of a
Density Bonus waiver)
238
Item # 17.
8 Resolution No. ______
Standard Proposed Conformance
Bicycle Parking
On-street guest racks
equivalent to five percent
(5%) of the parking
requirement.

Five bicycle parking spaces
Six bicycle parking spaces Yes
Parking Location
Parking must be located so
that it is not visible from
the street.
56 private garage entrances
face the interior drive aisle Yes
Parking Garages
attached to
individual units
Garages may not occupy
more than 50% of Ground
Level Frontage facing
street.

No parking garage is facing
the street frontage. Yes
Parking Access
and Curb Cuts
Maximum two curb cuts
per lot per street frontage One curb cut along Houret
Court Yes
Furthermore, as the Project is an eligible housing project under the State Density Bonus Law, Government Code Section 65915(p)(5), the Project is entitled to waivers and reduced parking requirements. The requested waivers and parking exception will support the development of affordable housing units on a site where it would not otherwise be possible through a strict application of the specified standard.

SECTION 5. Conditional Use Permit Findings (Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-57.04(F)) The City Council makes the following findings based on the evidence in the public record in support of Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006:
a. The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity nor to the public health, safety and general welfare.

The Project will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or public health, safety, or general welfare. The Project is consistent with other multi-family residential projects within the TASP and conditioned to preserve the health and wellness of future residents. In addition, the condominium project creates housing opportunities and increases the diversity of housing types in the TASP area by utilizing accessory dwelling unit provisions.
b. The Project is consistent with the Milpitas Zoning Ordinance.

The proposed Project is consistent with the Milpitas Zoning Ordinance, as demonstrated in Table 2, above. The proposed multi-family residential building is permitted in the MXD3 Very High-Density Mixed-Use Zoning District. The project design conforms to the site and development standards of the MXD3 zone. Therefore, a conditional use permit is required to allow the subdivision of the proposed townhome units.

The Project also conforms to MMC Section XI-10-54.015 (Density Bonus for Affordable Housing Developments) and XI-10-57.05 (Density Bonus Permits). Where exceptions from the MXD3 standards are needed, the applicant has requested waivers and parking exceptions pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code § 65915 et seq.). The requested waivers and parking exception will support the development of affordable housing on a site where it would not otherwise be possible through a strict application of the specified standard. 239
Item # 17.
9 Resolution No. ______
c. The Project is consistent with the Milpitas General Plan.

The proposed Project is consistent with the Milpitas General Plan, as demonstrated and outlined in Table 1, above. d. The Project is consistent with the Transit Area Specific Plan (Milpitas Metro Specific Plan).

The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable policies and design guidelines of the TASP/MMSP, as demonstrated in Tables 3 and 4, above. As the Project is an eligible housing project under the State Density Bonus Law, Government Code Section 65915(p)(5), the Project is entitled to waivers and reduced parking requirements.

The requested waivers and parking exception will support the development of affordable housing units on a site where it would not otherwise be possible through a strict application of the specified standard. Furthermore, the City will require a partial vacation of a portion of the Houret Court cul-de-sac to the north to remain consistent with the Transit Area Specific Plan (Milpitas Metro Specific Plan) future roadway network.

SECTION 6. Density Bonus Permit (Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-54.15(D)) The City Council makes the following findings based on the evidence in the public record in support of Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001:

1. The maximum allowable base density specified in the General Plan, including any other permitted increases to density.

The proposed Project includes 56 townhome condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units, equaling to 41.67 dwelling units per acre, meeting the General Plan density allowed in the immediate area.

2. All affordable units shall be reasonably dispersed throughout the project, shall contain on average the same number of bedrooms as the non-affordable units in the project, and shall be comparable with the non-affordable units in terms of appearance, materials and finished quality. The Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council and/or Redevelopment Agency modifying the requirements as to unit size or type, if it is found that such a modification would better serve the affordable housing need of Milpitas.

The applicant has proposed four two-bedroom and four three-bedroom affordable units reserved for moderateincome households, in order to meet the requirement to develop fifteen percent (15%) of the total residential units into affordable units, which equates to 8.4 units. The approximate locations for the proposed eight units have been identified and approved by the Housing Department as being adequately dispersed throughout the site. Since the remaining 0.4 units cannot be physically developed, the applicant will pay an in-lieu fee commensurate to the value of such a unit, as determined by the City of Milpitas Housing Department.

3. Prior to final building inspection and occupancy for a project containing affordable units, the applicant shall execute and record at the Santa Clara County Recorder's Office the City's Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property, which Agreement shall explain the affordability requirements. The agreement shall be approved by the Milpitas City Attorney prior to recordation.

The Project has been conditioned to provide an agreement to the City of Milpitas explaining the affordability requirements, processes and procedures, to the satisfaction of the Milpitas City Attorney prior to the release of any Certificate of Occupancy.

4. Retaining Affordability. A developer shall agree to, and the City shall insure continued affordability of, all loweror very low-income density bonus units for thirty (30) years or a longer period of time, if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program.
240
Item # 17.
10 Resolution No. ______
This standard is not applicable to the Project. The Project will provide for-sale affordable housing to families of moderate income.

5. Affordable Rents. Those units targeted for lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code shall be affordable at a rent that does not exceed thirty (30%) of sixty (60%) percent of the Santa Clara County median income. Those units targeted for very low-income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code, shall be affordable at a rent that does not exceed thirty (30%) of fifty (50%) percent of County median income.

The standard is not applicable to the Project, as the Project is creating townhome condominiums for sale, rather than for rent. Affordability provisions will be assessed on the sale of the individual condominium.

6. Relation to Statute. Density bonus requirements not specified in these regulations shall be governed by the State Density Bonus Law, Government Code section 65915, et seq.

Any density bonus requirements not specified in the City’s Municipal Code shall be governed by the State Density Bonus Law, Government Code Section 65915, et seq.

Density Bonus Concessions, Incentives and Waivers
In accordance with California Government Code Section 65915 and MMC Section X-10-54.15, the City must grant the requested incentives/concessions unless the City can make either of the following findings in writing and based on substantial evidence:
a. The concession is not required in order to provide for affordable housing costs as defined in State Health and Safety Section 50052.2 or for rents for the affordable units pursuant to Section XI-10-54.15(D)(5), Standards, of Chapter 10 (Zoning) of the Milpitas Municipal Code. b. The concession would have a specific adverse impact as defined in State Government Code Section 65589.5(d) (2) upon the public health and safety or the physical environment, or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income households.

If findings cannot be made, then the proposed concessions/incentives and waivers must be granted, based on the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code and California Government Code Sections 65915 – 65918.

The City does not have substantial evidence to demonstrate that the concessions/incentives and waivers described in Table 5 would fail to result in actual and identifiable cost savings, and/or that these savings are unnecessary to provide the level of affordability proposed. Moreover, the City has no substantial evidence that any of the requested concessions, incentives or waivers would result in any specific, adverse impacts to public health, safety, the physical environment, or historical resources. Accordingly, the City Council hereby approves such requested concessions/incentives and waivers.
241
Item # 17.
11 Resolution No. ______
Table 5: State Density Bonus – Concessions, Waivers, and Incentives Type of
Modification Standard Applicant Request Justification Discretion Waiver(s) Front and rear
yard setback
A request to
reduce the front
yard setback from
31-35 feet to 24
feet and the rear
yard setback from
15 feet to 10 feet.

Due to the 0.33-acre
reduction in the overall
site area to
accommodate future
widening of Montague
Expressway, the
applicant requests a
reduction in the
required front setback
to meet the minimum
density requirement in
the R-3 zone.

This waiver is allowed
under State Density Bonus
Law and must be granted
by the City.

Parking
Waiver
Vehicle
Parking
Reduction
To provide 84
vehicle parking
spaces when 107
vehicle parking
spaces are
required per
MMC.

The State Density
Bonus Law provides a
reduction in the
minimum parking
requirements for
qualifying projects
A waiver of minimum
parking standards is
allowed under State
Density Bonus Law and
must be granted by the
City.

SECTION 7. Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held incorrect, invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, phrase, or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases or clauses be declared incorrect, invalid, illegal, or unenforceable.

SECTION 8. City Council Approval
The City Council hereby approves Site Development Permit No. SD21-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21- 0006, Vesting Tentative Map No. MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21- 0035, and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004 (subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1 and CEQA Exemption Memorandum incorporated as Exhibit 2), based on the above findings.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of___________ 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
242
Item # 17.
12 Resolution No. ______
ATTEST:
___________________________
Wendy Wood, City Clerk
APPROVED:

Rich Tran, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney
243
Item # 17.
13 Resolution No. ______
EXHIBIT 1

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

CITY VENTURES TOWNHOMES RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. SD21-0012
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. UP21-0006
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. MT21-0002
DENSITY BONUS PERMIT NO. DB21-0001
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TR21-0035
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA21-0004

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. General Compliance: The Permittee and owner, including all successors in interest (collectively "Permittee") shall comply with each and every condition set forth in this Permit. SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SD21-0012, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UP21-0006 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP MT21-0002, DENSITY BONUS PERMIT NO. DB21-0001, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TR21-0035 and ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA21-0004 (collectively "Permit") shall have no force or effect and no building permit shall be issued unless and until all things required by the below-enumerated precedent conditions have been performed or caused to be performed. The Permittee shall develop the site in accordance with the approved Attachments and as modified by these Conditions of Approval.

2. Effective Date: Unless there is a timely appeal filed in accordance with the Milpitas Zoning Code, the date of approval of this Permit is the date on which the City Council approved this Permit.

3. Acceptance of Permit: Should Permittee fail to file a timely appeal within twelve (12) calendar days of the date of approval of this Permit, inaction by Permittee shall be deemed to constitute each of the following:
a. Acceptance of this Permit by Permittee; and
b. Agreement by the Permittee to be bound by, comply with, and to do all things required of or by Permittee pursuant to all of the terms, obligations, and conditions of this Permit.

4. Permit Expiration: Pursuant to Section XI-10-64-06 of the Milpitas Municipal Code, this Permit shall become null and void if the activity permitted by this Permit is not commenced within two (2) years from the date of approval, or for a project submitted with a tentative map, within the time limits of the approved tentative map. Pursuant to Section XI-10-

64.06(B) of the Milpitas Municipal Code, an activity permitted by this Permit shall be deemed to have commenced when the Project:
a. Completes a foundation associated with the Project; or b. Dedicates any land or easement as required from the zoning action; or c. Complies with all legal requirements necessary to commence the use, or obtains an occupancy permit, whichever is sooner.

5. Time Extension: Pursuant to Section XI-10-64.07 of the Milpitas Municipal Code, unless otherwise provided by State law, Permittee shall have the right to request a one-time extension of the Permit if the request is made in writing to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date of the approval. (P)

6. Project Job Account: If Permittee's project job account is at any time delinquent or below the required deposit amount, City will not continue to review or process the application until Permittee's project job account is paid in full and the required deposit has been made. Additionally, prior to the issuance of any building permit or occupancy permit as applicable, Permittee shall pay in full the Project account balance and establish a remaining balance of at least twentyfive percent (25%) of the required initial deposit. (P/E) 244
Item # 17.
14 Resolution No. ______

7. Notice: Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66020, any protest filed in court relating to the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions to be imposed on the development project shall be filed within ninety (90) days after the date of the adoption of this Resolution. This provision serves as notice from the local agency to the Permittee that the ninety (90) day period in which the Permittee may file a protest has begun under California Government Code Section 66020(d)(1).

8. Cost and Approval: Permittee shall fully complete and satisfy each and every condition set forth in this Resolution and any other condition applicable to the Project to the sole satisfaction of the City. Additionally, Permittee shall be solely responsible and liable for the cost to satisfy each and every condition. (ALL)

9. Conditions: Each and every condition set forth in this Exhibit shall apply to the Project and continue to apply to the Project so long as the Project is operating under the permits and approvals in this Resolution. (ALL)

10. Compliance with Laws: The construction, use, and all related activity authorized under this Permit shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, guidelines, requirements and policies. (CAO/P/E/B)

11. Indemnification: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Permittee shall indemnify, defend with counsel of the City's choosing, and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to (i) City's approval of the project, including, but not limited to, the approval of the discretionary permits, maps under the Subdivision Map Act, and/or the City's related determinations or actions under the California Environmental Quality Act, and (ii) Permittee's construction, operation, use or related activity under this Permit. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Permittee, City and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. Permittee shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees and damages, which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition.

Permittee shall pay to the City upon demand or, as applicable, to counsel of City's choosing, any amount owed pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. The above indemnification is intended to be as broad as permitted by applicable law. To the extent the above indemnification is limited by Government Code Section 66474.9, any limitations shall only apply to Vesting Tentative Map No. MT16-0003, and the balance of the Permit shall be unaffected by Government Code Section 66474.9.

12. Certificate of Insurance: Permittee shall provide certificate of insurance and name City as an additional insured in its insurance policies for the Project.

13. Revocation, Suspension, Modification: This Permit may be suspended, revoked or modified in accordance with Section XI-10-63.06 of the Milpitas Municipal Code.

14. Severability: If any term, provision, or condition of this Permit is held to be illegal or unenforceable by the Court, such term, provision or condition shall be severed and shall be inoperative, and the remainder of this Permit shall remain operative, binding and fully enforceable.

15. Response to Conditions of Approval: Permittee shall provide a written response to comments upon submittal for building permit application. The responses should clearly indicate how each condition of approval has been addressed in the plans and shall note the appropriate plan sheet. (P)

16. Compliance with Fire Department and California Fire Code: The project shall comply with the requirements of the Milpitas Fire Department and the California Fire Code, as adopted by the City. Changes to the site plan and/or buildings requires review and re-approval by the Fire Department. (F)

17. Development in Conformance with Approved Plans: Permittee shall develop the approved Project in conformance with the plans dated March 17, 2022 and approved by the City Council on , in accordance with 245
Item # 17.
15 Resolution No. ______
these Conditions of Approval. Any deviation from the approved site plan, elevations, materials, colors, landscape plan or other approved submittal shall require that, prior to the issuance of building permits, the Permittee shall submit modified plans and any other applicable materials as required by the City for review, and obtain the approval of the Planning Director or Designee. If the Planning Director or designee determines that the deviation is significant, the owner or designee shall be required to apply for review and obtain approval of the Planning Commission or City Council, as applicable, in accordance with the Milpitas Zoning Code. (P)

PLANNING CONDITIONS

18. Landscape: All approved landscaping shall be permanently maintained and replaced with substantially similar plant material as necessary to provide a permanent, attractive and effective appearance.

19. Architecture: Permittee shall submit updated Project Architecture depicted on the Building Elevations sheets to the Planning Division, and obtain approval from the Planning Director or Designee prior to Building Permit submittal. Any deviations from approved Project Architecture shall be approved at the sole discretion of the Director of Planning or his/her approved designee

20. Street Lights: Permittee shall provide or relocate street lighting along all street frontages subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. Permittee shall likewise install pedestrian scale lights along all public and private street frontages. The Permittee shall submit a photometric plan to determine appropriate light levels with submittal of on-site improvement plans.

21. Parking: Parking shall be provided as depicted on the Site Plan approved by the City Council and shall consist of the following:
a. RESIDENT: A total of 80 vehicle spaces within a parking garage. b. GUEST: A total of four vehicle spaces are to be provided on site.

22. Bicycle Racks: A total of six (6) short-term bicycle parking spaces shall be installed on the site.

23. Trees: The project will remove 19 trees (17 ordinance-sized) and replace with approximately 50 trees, in conformance with the plans approved by City Council on , 2022.

24. Public Art Requirement: Permittee shall comply with the City’s Public Art Requirements for Private Development, as set forth in Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-14. Fee shall be no less than one-half of one percent of building development costs and shall be payable at time of building permit issuance.

25. Affordable Housing Requirement: Permittee shall comply with the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance, as set forth in Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-1-3.00. All new residential development projects of ten units or more designed and intended for permanent occupancy shall construct 15 percent of the total number of dwelling units within the development as affordable units, unless otherwise remedied by the City Council.

26. Affordable Housing Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for an affordable unit, resale restrictions or rental controls, or both, as the case may be, shall be set forth in an agreement between the City and the applicant, which agreement shall be recorded against the affordable units. The agreement shall be executed by the City Manager or designee, and its requirements shall run with the land and bind the applicant's successors. Covenants on the affordable units shall not be less than 55 years.
246
Item # 17.
16 Resolution No. ______

PLANNING & BUILDING PROJECT-RELATED TASP MITIGATION MEASURES &

REQUIRED PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES
Biological Resources (TASP Policy 5.26)

27. Nesting Birds: To mitigate impacts on non-listed special-status nesting raptors and other nesting birds, a qualified biologist will survey the site for nesting raptors and other nesting birds within 14 days prior to any ground disturbing activity or vegetation removal. If active nests are found, the results of the surveys will be forwarded to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) and CDFG (as appropriate) and, on a case-by-case basis, avoidance procedures adopted. These can include construction buffer areas (several hundred feet in the case of raptors) or seasonal avoidance.

However, if construction activities occur only during the non-breeding season between August 31 and February 1, no surveys will be required. (P)
Noise (TASP Policy 5.10))

28. Noise Insulation: Prior to issuance of any building permit, Permittee shall demonstrate that the Project will meet the required 45 dBA maximum interior noise standard.

Air Quality (TASP Policy 5.16)

29. Dust Control Emissions: During the construction of the Project, Permittee shall comply with all of the following:
a. All exposed surfaces (e.g. parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas and unpaved roads) shall be watered two times per day.
b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand or other loose material off the site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day or more often if determined necessary by City Engineer or designee. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 MPH. e. All roadways, driveways and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five (5) minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the City regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. (B)

30. ROG Emissions: Prior to issuance of any building permit, Permittee shall develop, submit and obtain approval from the City of a plan to reduce ROG emissions by 17 percent or greater during the architectural coating phase of the construction. Acceptable measures to achieve this goal include, but are not limited to, using paint that contains 125 grams per liter of VOC or less, the use of pre-fabricated building materials, or a combination of both. The plan shall be implemented as approved by the City. (B)
247
Item # 17.
17 Resolution No. ______

ENGINEERING CONDITIONS

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PLAN SUBMITTALS
The following conditions shall be met prior to any detailed construction plan check submittals (Building or Engineering, except demolition and rough grade plans), unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. City reserves the right to reject any plan check submittal if any of the following conditions are not met. (E)

32. Modifications: The Site Development Plan dated March 16, 2022 is subject to change during the plan check stage based upon City’s previous comments and conditions stated herein.

33. Solid Waste and Recycling Handling Plan: Permittee shall submit final Solid Waste and Recycling Handling Plan based upon City’s previous comments for City’s review and approval by the Engineering Department. The subject Plan shall show calculations of waste generation volumes and how materials will be transferred from the waste generation areas to the trash enclosure/external collection point; demonstrate how recycling shall have a separately maintained process from garbage handling; address other requirements such as waste generation and property management responsibility for bin management and litter control; and procure sufficient service frequency.

34. Photometric Analysis: Permittee shall submit streetlight photometric analysis for City’s review and approval by the Engineering Department along Montague Expressway, Houret Drive, and Houret Court that meet the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA), RP8, for roadway and sidewalk lighting standards and City standard design guidelines.

35. Recycle Water Cross-Connection Specialist: In order to comply with the California Code of Regulations Title 17 and 22, and for timely plan approval by the California State Water Resources Control Board/Division of Drinking Water as well as by the South Bay Water Recycling, Permittee must hire a certified cross-connection specialist for their consultation as to irrigation water system design and construction phasing. The name and contact information of the certified cross-connection specialist shall be provided on all landscape submittal plans.

36. Submittal Requirements: Permittee to ensure that all plan check submittals are in accordance with City’s submittal check list for each permit type, including but not limited to, payment of permit fees and/or fee deposit at the time of the submittal.

37. Project Job Account/Fee Deposit: Permittee shall open a new PJ account as a deposit to cover the costs for Engineering Department’s services for review and inspection of the project. The amount shall be determined based on the public improvement cost estimates as prepared by the Permittee’s engineer.

PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL/RECORDATION
The following conditions shall be addressed during the final map plan check process and shall be met prior to any final approval/recordation (except demolition permit and rough grade permit), unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. (E)

38. Dedication on the Final Map: Permittee shall dedicate necessary emergency vehicle access easements, public service utility easements, street easements, public access easement and other public easements deemed necessary for the project, including a 10-foot wide public service and utility easement (PSUE) behind the proposed sidewalks along Houret Drive and Houret Court.

39. Abandonment/Quitclaim Easements: Permittee shall abandon/quit claim existing easements that are in conflict with or unnecessary for the project.

40. Partial Street Vacation: A partial vacation on Houret Court is required. Permittee shall work with Engineering Department such that the vacation occurs prior to issuance of the Encroachment Permit for off-site public improvements.
248
Item # 17.
18 Resolution No. ______

41. Easements on the Final Map: Permittee shall depict all existing easements to remain based upon current preliminary title report and depict new easements on the final map.

42. Concurrent Off-site Plan Reviews: Permittee shall submit separate off-site improvement plans for City’s review and approval by the Engineering Department.

43. Street Name Approval: Permittee shall obtain approval from the City Council for all new street names based upon recommendation from the Planning Commission and City guidelines.

44. Utility Company Approval: Permittee shall obtain written approval from utility companies (PG&E, AT&T, Comcast) for abandonment of existing and dedication of new public service utilities easements.

45. Demolition of Existing Building: Permittee shall demolish existing buildings/facilities that are in conflict with the new property lines.

46. Covenant, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs): Permittee shall provide CC&Rs for City’s review and approval for perpetual maintenance of private roadways, private utilities, stormwater management facilities in accordance with a separately recorded Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There shall be provisions in the CC&Rs to retain a recycled water site supervisor with annual re-certification report to the City’s Public Works Department.

47. Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities: Permittee shall execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and provide improvement securities in accordance with MMC Title XI, Section 17, and submit all other supplemental documents as stipulated in the Improvement Agreement (such as certificate of insurance).

48. Annexation to the Community Facilities District: Permittee shall submit an executed petition affirmatively consenting to annex the subject property to the Community Facilities District (CFD) 2008-1, and agree to pay the special taxes levied by the CFD 2008-1 for the purpose of maintaining the public services. The CFD annexation process shall be completed prior to final map approval. Permittee shall comply with all rules, regulations, policies and practices established by the State Law and/or by the City with respect to the CFD including, without limitation, requirements for notice and disclosure to future owners and/or residents. This condition of approval is nonseverable from the Permit and invalidation or limitation of this condition invalidates the Permit, condition 14 notwithstanding.

PRIOR TO OFF-SITE PLAN APPROVAL/ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ISSUANCE The following conditions shall be addressed as part of the off-site improvement plan review and shall be met prior to encroachment permit issuance, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. (E)

49. Public Improvement Design Standards: All public improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with all applicable public improvement design standards, including but not limited to:
a. Milpitas Design Guidelines: (http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/milpitas/departments/engineering/designguidelines/); b. Standard details and specifications:
(http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/milpitas/departments/engineering/standard-details-and-specifications/); c. Transit Area Specific Plan design guidelines:
(http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/engDesignGuidelines/en_dg_vi_transitAreaSpecific.pdf); and d. Santa Clara County Roads and Airports (SCCRA) design guidelines (for improvements along Montague Expressway); and
e. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, where applicable.

50. Sanitary Sewer Calculations: Permittee shall submit a completed “Sewer Needs Questionnaire” form and sanitary sewer calculations to justify lateral size design, allocation of discharge for each of the lateral, and impact to the existing main. Permittee shall be responsible to implement any necessary improvements if there is any identified deficiency to the existing main as a result of the project. 249
Item # 17.
19 Resolution No. ______

51. Storm Drain Design: Permittee shall submit storm drain hydrology and hydraulic calculations based upon a 10-year storm event to justify the size of the storm drain lateral flowing full, without surcharging the main line pipe, and to be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department.

52. Domestic Water and Fire Service Calculations: Permittee shall submit potable water and fire service calculations to confirm adequacy of lateral size, pressure and flow, to be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department and Fire Department. Hydraulic modeling analysis by the City and paid by the Permittee may be required as needed.

Permittee shall be responsible to implement any necessary improvements if there is any identified deficiency to the existing main as a result of the project.

53. Seismic Improvements Strategic Plan: The Project shall meet the design criteria identified in Backbone Pipeline Design Standard section of the 2006 Seismic Improvements Strategic Plan.

54. Specific Improvements: In addition to standard public improvements required under Milpitas Municipal Code (MMC) Title XI, Chapter 1, Section 7, Permittee shall install other specific improvements listed below including incidental improvements as required by the City as part of the encroachment permit, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer or his Designee.
a) Underground any existing overhead facilities along the frontage of Montague Expressway, Houret Drive, and Houret Court per MMC Title XI, Chapter 1, Section 7.02-2. b) Installation of an extension of the existing 6” recycled water main on Montague Expressway along the development property’s entire Montague Expressway street frontage, and recycled water services lines servicing all new on-site and off-site irrigation facilities. Separate recycled water service lines and meters are required for the irrigation of private on-site landscaping and City-maintained public right-ofway landscaping. c) Installation of public (City-maintained) water and sewer mains within on-site private streets and public easements. Please ensure all horizontal and vertical separations meet the CCR title 22 requirements. d) Installation of separate utility service lines (domestic water, fire service, sanitary sewer) for each residential building at minimum.
e) Installation of radio-transmitted water meters with a meter antenna, any repeaters or transmitters as needed with dedicated power supplies at no cost to the City at locations acceptable to the City to ensure accurate and timely reception of meter readings. Permittee shall execute a recorded instrument providing dedicated space, access rights and dedicated power supplies to the City for operation/maintenance/repair/replacement of subject radio antenna. f) Installation of sidewalk improvements along the project street frontage on Montague Expressway, Houret Drive, and Houret Court, including a stamped concrete crosswalk at the intersection of Montague Expressway and Houret Drive to connect the north and south sides of the street. All concrete crosswalks, concrete parking lanes, tree well grates, etc. shall comply with the applicable TASP design details.
g) Installation of street, sidewalk, and landscape facilities along Montague Expressway in compliance with the half-street section shown in TASP 5.2. The new curb line along Montague Expressway shall line up with the curb line with of the adjacent recently-built Ellison Park community to the north. h) Installation asphalt concrete-based repair and microsurface or Type II slurry seal along the project street frontage on Houret Drive and Houret Court as necessary to the City Engineer’s satisfaction. i) Installation of new street tree wells along the project frontage. The locations, spacing of tree wells and tree species shall be in compliance with applicable City standards and details, including TASP design details.

55. Abandonment of Existing City Utilities: Permittee shall cap, abandon or remove any unused existing public utilities based upon City’s Abandonment Notes and to the City’s satisfaction. 250
Item # 17.
20 Resolution No. ______

56. Relocation and Adjustment of Existing Public Utilities: Permittee shall relocate and/or adjust existing public utilities as needed that are in conflict with the proposed improvements.

57. Maintenance Agreement: Permittee shall record a Maintenance Agreement for perpetual maintenance of any public improvements mutually agreed between the City and the Permittee.

58. Water Service Agreement: Permittee shall complete a water service agreement to obtain water service.

59. Encroachment Permit: Prior to any work in the public right-of-way and/or public easement, obtain an encroachment permit with insurance requirements for all public improvements including a traffic control plan per the latest California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards to be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department.

60. Pothole Encroachment Permit: Due to multiple new utility service connections along the project frontage, Permittee shall pothole and verify all potential utility crossing conflict as part of the public improvement plan during the design stage.

61. Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Permit: All offsite improvements along the Montague Expressway frontage, including fencing, shall comply with Santa Clara County Roads and Airports (SCCRA) requirements. Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits with SCCRA for any work done along Montague Expressway. Any plans that include offsite improvements along Montague Expressway shall:
a. Include SCCRA Notes and Standard Details.

PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
The following conditions shall be addressed during the building plan check process and shall be met prior to any building permit issuance (except demolition permit and rough grade permit), unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer). (E)

62. Final Map Recordation: Permittee shall record the final map.

63. Easements on the Building Permit Plans: Permittee shall depict all existing easements to remain based upon current preliminary title report and depict new easements on applicable building permit plans.

64. Stormwater Facility Operation & Maintenance Plan: Permittee shall incorporate design details into applicable construction plans in accordance with City approved Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP). Permittee shall also submit Stormwater Facility Operation & Maintenance Plan that describes operation and maintenance procedures needed to ensure that treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other storm water control measures continue to work as intended and do not create a nuisance (including vector control).

65. Stormwater Management Facilities O&M Agreement: Permittee shall execute and record a Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement associated with the SWCP O&M Plan, including perpetual maintenance of treatment areas/units, as reviewed and accepted by the Engineering Department. The subject O&M Agreement shall be referenced in the CC&Rs, if applicable.

66. NPDES Compliance: The project shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES) permit as administered by the California State Water Resources Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project is required to meet the performance standards within the permit. Specifically the project shall incorporate, at a minimum, stormwater treatment measures that meet the numeric sizing requirements for pollutant removal.

67. Water Supply and Force Majeure. The City reserves the right to suspend the issuance of building permits in case of an emergency declaration of water supply in the case of a major catastrophic event that restricts City’s assurance to provide water supply.
251
Item # 17.
21 Resolution No. ______

68. Recycle Water Approval: Permittee shall use recycled water for landscape irrigation purpose, except for the interior courtyard/podium areas within the building footprint where the potable water shall be used for irrigation. Permittee shall comply with California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, titled “Water Recycling Criteria”, CCR, Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 5, Subchapter 1 titled “Drinking Water Supply” and all other recycled water regulations as listed under the publication titled “California Department of Public Health Regulations Related to Recycled Water June 18, 2014”. Permittee shall obtain approval from the California State Water Resources Control Board/Division of Drinking Water, South Bay Water Recycling and the City for recycled water design, including but not limited to on-site irrigation design, based upon South Bay Water Recycling Guidelines and City of Milpitas Supplemental Guidelines. All landscape plants shall be compatible with recycled water.

69. Water Efficient Landscapes: Permittee shall comply with Milpitas Municipal Code Title VIII, Chapter 5 (Water Efficient Landscapes) for landscape design, including but not limited to, providing separate water meters for domestic water service and irrigation service and providing applicable landscape documentation package.

70. Solid Waste and Recycling Facility Design: Permittee shall comply with all applicable City design guidelines/details associated with haul route, turning radius, vertical and horizontal clearance, trash enclosure, staging area, storage area, etc.

71. Recycling Report Prior to Demolition Permit Issuance: Permittee shall submit Part I of a Recycling Report on business letterhead to the Building Department, for forwarding to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The report shall describe the following resource recovery activities:
a. What materials will be salvaged.
b. How materials will be processed during demolition.
c. Intended locations or businesses for reuse or recycling. d. Quantity estimates in tons (both recyclable and for landfill disposal). Estimates for recycling and disposal tonnage amounts by material type shall be included as separate items in all reports to the Building Division before demolition begins.

Permittee shall make every effort to salvage materials for reuse and recycling, and shall comply with the City’s demolition and construction debris recycling ordinance.

72. Recycling Report Prior to Building Permit Issuance: Permittee shall submit Part II of the Recycling Report to the Building Department, for forwarding to the Engineering Department. Part II of the Recycling Report shall be supported by copies of weight tags and/or receipts of “end dumps.” Actual reuse, recycling and disposal tonnage amounts (and estimates for “end dumps”) shall be submitted to the Building Department for approval by the Engineering Department prior to inspection by the Building Department.

73. Flood Plain Management: This project is in the Flood Zone “AO” with 1’ average flood depth, therefore, Permittee shall comply with all applicable flood protection criterion required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and MMC Title XI, Chapter 15. Permittee shall obtain a CLOMR-F from FEMA for the development prior to building permit application submittal and a LOMR-F prior to occupancy release.

74. Development Fees: Permittee shall pay the following development fees. The information listed in items “a” through “i” are based upon current fee rates; however, those fee rates are subject to change. The exact fee amount shall be determined at the time of building permit fee payment.
a. Transit Area Specific Plan Development Fee at $44,009/unit for residential uses. Based on approval for development of 56 units, the estimated Transit Area Specific Plan Development Impact Fee for this project is $2,464,504 ($44,009/unit x 56 units). TASP fees shall be paid prior to issuance ofbBuilding permit.
b. Parkland Impact Fee

1. The project is required to dedicate 0.49 acres of parkland, equivalent to $1,360,577 fees-in-lieu.

2. The park portion of the TASP fee is valued at $1,108,688, equivalent to 0.40 acres. This will be applied to the project parkland requirement.
252
Item # 17.
22 Resolution No. ______

3. The applicant will receive credit for 0.09 acres of private recreation space on site. Upon demonstration of provision of this private recreation space to the satisfaction of the Direction of Planning or his/her designee, no additional parkland fees will be due, per table below.

City Ventures Townhomes Proposed 56
City Ventures Townhomes Population Estimate
(2.49 persons/unit)
139 persons
TASP Parkland Requirement 3.5 acres/1,000 people or equivalent fees-in-lieu
Total Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Fee Required 0.49 acres / $1,360,577 Amount Satisfied Through TASP Fees (Acreage/Dollars) 0.40 acres / $1,108,688 Remaining Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Fee
Required 0.09 acres / $251,889
Private Recreation/Open Space Included in the Project 0.42 acres Balance of Parkland Acreage or In-Lieu Feed Due 0.00 acres / $0 c. Storm water connection fee at $16,771/acre for residential. d. Water connection fee at $1,164/unit for residential, based upon increased water usage. e. Sewer connection fee at $1,406/unit for residential, based upon increased average wastewater flow. f. 3.8% of applicable fees in accordance with City Resolution No. 8969 as Permitting Automation Fee. g. FEMA Flood Zone Designation Letter fee in the amount of $100.00 each. h. Public Art Fee, as set forth in Milpitas Municipal Code Section XI-10-14. i. Affordable Housing Fee for 0.4 units, as set forth in Milpitas Municipal Code Section XII-1-4.00

75. Mailboxes: The Permittee shall obtain information from the US Postal Services regarding placement of required mailboxes. Structures to protect mailboxes may require Building, Engineering and Planning Department review.

DURING CONSTRUCTION
The following conditions shall be complied with at all times during the construction phase of the project, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. (E)

76. Dewatering: If dewatering is needed during construction, Permittee shall obtain a Short-Term Industrial Wastewater Permit from the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant for discharging the groundwater to a sanitary sewer system.

77. On-site Recycle Water Coordination: Permittee’s cross-connection specialist shall coordinate the phasing of the construction; facilitate the cross-connection testing in order to minimize the impact for occupied buildings during cross-connection testing; sign-off before the water meter set; coordinate on-site construction inspection; complete the site inspection; fill out required paperwork/questionnaire; and provide them to the City for forwarding to South Bay Water Recycling.
253
Item # 17.
23 Resolution No. ______

78. Prohibition of Potable Water Usage: Permittee shall use recycled water for construction purposes, including dust control and compaction. Permittee shall comply with MMC VIII-6-5.00 and 6-6.00 where potable water usage is prohibited, unless otherwise approved by the City Council.

79. Construction Staging and Employee Parking: Permittee shall place all construction related materials, equipment, and arrange construction workers parking on-site and not located in the public right-of-ways or public easements.

80. Water Shut-down Plan: Permittee shall provide a water shut-down plan at least seven days in advance of the shutdown in coordination with the Engineering Inspector, and notify affected property owners/tenants when cut-in tee(s) is/are required.

PRIOR TO FIRST OCCUPANCY
The following conditions shall be met prior to first building occupancy on either lot, unless otherwise approved the Director of Engineering/City Engineer.

81. Completion of Public Improvements: Permittee shall complete all public improvements, including but not limited to frontage improvements along Montague Expressway, Houret Drive, and Court, extension of the recycled water main along the entire Montague Expressway frontage, and on-site City water and sanitary sewer mains, laterals, and facilities, as shown on City approved plans.

82. LOMR-F: Permittee shall submit the FEMA approved LOMR-F for each unit/building associated with the requested occupancy, if project is located in the SFHA.

83. Elevation and/or Flood Proofing Certificate: Permittee's civil engineer shall submit Elevation and/or Flood Proofing Certificate for the lowest finished floor elevation of each building for City record.

84. Landscape Certificate of Completion: Permittee shall submit a Certificate of Substantial Completion that complies with the Milpitas Municipal Code Water Efficient Landscapes ordinance.

85. Certificate of Cross-Connection: Permittee shall ensure that the cross-connection specialist complete the required recycled water construction inspection checklist, cross connection test results and any special inspection checklist as required by the South Bay Recycling Program http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1595 and forward them to the City.

86. Record Drawings: Permittee shall submit record drawings in AutoCAD, Tiff, and PDF formats for City records.

Record drawings shall include all public improvements. Additionally, if the project uses recycled water, the permittee shall also submit record drawings of on-site irrigation facilities.

87. Private Job (PJ) Balance: Permittee shall pay for any remaining balance from the Private Job deposit.

88. Backflow Devices: All backflow preventer devices shall be tested by a certified backflow tester, and results of the test shall be submitted to the City before going into service.

LEGEND
P = Planning Department
B = Building Department
E = Engineering Department
F = Fire Department
CAO = City Attorney’s Office
ALL = All Reviewing Departments
254
Item # 17.
24 Resolution No. ______

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO PROTEST
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), began on date of adoption of this resolution. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.

AGREEMENT
Permittee/Property Owner
The undersigned agrees to each and every condition of approval and acknowledges the NOTICE OF RIGHT TO PROTEST and hereby agrees to use the Project property on the terms and conditions set forth in this resolution.

Dated: _________________ ______________________________________ Signature of Permittee
255
Item # 17.

Resolution No. _____
EXHIBIT 2

CEQA EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
256
Item # 17.

CARLSBAD
FRESNO
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
157 Park Place, Pt. Richmond, California  94801     510.236.6810     www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 25, 2022
TO: Michael Fossati, Senior Planner, City of Milpitas
FROM: Theresa Wallace, AICP, Principal
Matthew Wiswell, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner
Ashley Manheim, Environmental Planner
SUBJECT: 1752‐1810 Houret Court Project Categorical Exemption This memorandum supports the finding that the proposed 1752‐1810 Houret Court Project (proposed project) would be exempt from further review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15195 (Residential Infill). The project site is made up of two parcels located at 1752 and 1810 Houret Court in the City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the proposed project would consist of the demolition of the existing buildings and associated improvements on the site and the construction of eight residential buildings that would contain 56 townhome‐style condominium units, 24 of which would include ground floor accessory dwelling units, for a total of 80 residential units. Associated circulation, parking, landscaping, and infrastructure improvements would also be developed.

EXEMPTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS
Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code requires the CEQA Guidelines to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary for Natural Resources identified various classes of projects in the CEQA Guidelines that do not have a significant effect on the environment to be categorically exempt.

In addition, Article 12.5 of the CEQA Guidelines includes exemptions for agricultural housing, affordable housing, and residential infill projects provided that certain threshold criteria are met.

The following discusses how the proposed project meets the necessary criteria to forego environmental review pursuant to CEQA under the Section 15195 Residential Infill Exemption.

Section 15195. Residential Infill Exemption
a. Except as set forth in subdivision (b), CEQA does not apply to any development project that meets the following criteria:

1. The project meets the threshold criteria set forth in section 15192; provided that with respect to the requirement in section 15192(b) regarding community‐level environmental review, 257
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   2 such review must be certified or adopted within five years of the date that the lead agency deems the application for the project to be complete pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code.

Please refer to the following section (Section 15192. Threshold Requirements for Exemptions for Agricultural Housing, Affordable Housing, and Residential Infill Projects). The proposed project would meet the threshold criteria set forth in Section 15192, as further described below, and the Milpitas General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified on March 9, 2021.1 Therefore, the proposed project would meet both of the above criteria.

2. The project meets both of the following size criteria: (A) The site of the project is not more than four acres in total area. (B) The project does not include any single level building that exceeds 100,000 square feet.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the project site is approximately 1.92 acres in size and all buildings would be four stories, ranging from approximately 5,220 to 14,618 square feet in size. Therefore, the proposed project would meet both of the above size criteria.

3. The project meets both of the following requirements regarding location: (A) The project is a residential project on an infill site. (B) The project is within one‐half mile of a major transit stop.

CEQA Guidelines Section 21061.3 defines an “infill site” as an urbanized area that meets either of the following criteria:
a. The site has not been previously developed for urban uses and both of the following apply:
1) The site is immediately adjacent to parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses, or at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses and the remaining 25 percent of the site adjoins parcels that have previously been developed for qualified uses, or
2) No parcel within the site has been created within the past 10 years unless the parcel was created as a result of the plan of a redevelopment agency. b. The site has been previously developed for qualified urban uses. CEQA Guidelines Section 21072 defines a “qualified urban use” as any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the project site is currently developed with two industrial buildings that include commercial and light industrial uses. Therefore, the existing site meets the definition of a qualified urban use as specified by CEQA Guidelines Section 21061.3(b) and the proposed project meets the definition of an infill site (Criterion A). The project proposes the development of 80 residential units and is located approximately 0.2 miles from the Milpitas Bay

1 Milpitas, City of. 2021. General Plan 2040. March 9.
258
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   3 Area Rapid Transit (BART) station and Montague Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) light rail station. Therefore, the project site is located within one half mile of a major transit stop (Criterion B). The proposed project would meet all the above requirements regarding location.

4. The project meets both of the following requirements regarding number of units: (A) The project does not contain more than 100 residential units. (B) The project promotes higher density infill housing. The lead agency may establish its own criteria for determining whether the project promotes higher density infill housing except in either of the following two circumstances: (i) a project with a density of at least 20 units per acre is conclusively presumed to promote higher density infill housing, and (ii) a project with a density of at least 10 units per acre and a density greater than the average density of the residential properties within 1,500 feet shall be presumed to promote higher density infill housing unless the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates otherwise.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the proposed project would include the development of 80 residential units on a 1.92‐acre site, which would result in a density of 41.67 units per acre. Therefore, the proposed project would meet both of the above requirements regarding number of units.

5. The project meets both of the following requirements regarding availability of affordable housing: The project would result in housing units being made available to moderate, low or very low income families as set forth in either A or B below: (A) The project meets one of the following criteria, and the project developer provides sufficient legal commitments to the appropriate local agency to ensure the continued availability and use of the housing units as set forth below at monthly housing costs determined pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (h) of Section 65589.5 of the Government Code. (i) At least 10 percent of the housing is sold to families of moderate income, or (ii) not less than 10 percent of the housing is rented to families of low income, or (iii) not less than 5 percent of the housing is rented to families of very low income. (B) If the project does not result in housing units being available as set forth in subdivision (A) above, then the project developer has paid or will pay in‐lieu fees pursuant to a local ordinance in an amount sufficient to result in the development or an equivalent number of units that would otherwise be required pursuant to subparagraph (A).

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, 8 out of the total 80 residential dwelling units would be affordable to moderate incomes, as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, specifically based on Santa Clara County median income levels (adjusted for family size). This equates to 10 percent of the total units. Additionally, an executed agreement imposing appropriate sale restrictions on the affordable units would be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Therefore, the proposed project would meet both of the above requirements regarding availability of affordable housing. b. A project that otherwise meets the criteria set forth in subdivision (a) is not exempt from CEQA if any of the following occur:

1. There is a reasonable possibility that the project will have a project‐specific, significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
259
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   4 The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of an urban infill site. As described in Attachment A, Project Description, multi‐family housing uses are permitted within the Very High Density Mixed Use (MXD3) zoning district. Additionally, the project site is located within the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP), which was designed to accommodate substantial growth. The TASP Final Environmental Impact Report (TASP FEIR) evaluated the environmental impacts of 7,100 units of residential development and a population increase of 18,000 new residents. As shown on Table A.1 in Attachment A, Project Description, development associated with the proposed project is within the amount of growth evaluated and cleared within the TASP FEIR. As described below, applicable policies and mitigation measures from the TASP FEIR would ensure that the proposed project would not have a project‐specific significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

Aesthetics. The project site is not located within a scenic viewshed or along a State Scenic Highway or other scenic highway. The only scenic resources located within the TASP Area are street trees located on McCandless Drive, approximately 500 feet west of the project site.

Agriculture and Forestry Resources. The TASP FEIR did not analyze impacts to agricultural resources as the TASP Area is urban without any agricultural or forest land uses in the area or vicinity. The project site, located within the TASP Area, is also not used for agriculture. The Santa Clara County Important Farmland 2012 map designates lands within the TASP Area, including the project site, as “Urban and Built‐Up Land.” Thus, the TASP and the proposed project would have no impacts on agriculture or forestry resources.

Air Quality. The proposed project would develop high‐intensity, transit‐oriented residential development and would result in a building density at the project site that is consistent with what was evaluated in the TASP FEIR. In addition, the population and housing units included in the proposed project would fall within the total development anticipated by the TASP FEIR. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially increase population, vehicle trips, or vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and the conclusions about compliance with the Clean Air Plan, effects on regional air quality, and localized carbon monoxide impacts in the TASP FEIR remain applicable to the project.

The TASP FEIR determined that construction of projects associated with the TASP would be less than significant with compliance with the BAAQMD’s basic construction mitigation measures and TASP policies. TASP Policy 5.16 requires the implementation of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD’s) basic construction mitigation measures. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would result in similar construction‐related, short‐term air quality impacts as those impacts identified in the TASP FEIR.

Policy 5.25 requires an analysis of the impact on future sensitive receptors located within 500 feet of active rail lines or roadways if traffic exceeds 100,000 vehicles per day. The future BART and VTA light rail is located approximately 0.2 miles northeast of the project site and would not generate harmful emissions at this distance. The roadways within 500 feet of the proposed project are Montague Expressway and McCandless Drive; traffic on these roadways would not exceed 100,000 260
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   5 vehicles per day and therefore no further analysis is required.2 The proposed project does not include additional toxic air contaminant (TAC) sources at the project site; therefore implementation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Biological Resources. The TASP FEIR determined that there is minimal potential for special‐status species to occur due to the history of development in the TASP Area. The project site is currently developed, and therefore does not contain any special‐status species habitat, federally protected wetlands, or riparian habitat. Many bird species use the existing ornamental trees for cover, nesting, or stop‐over locations during migration, especially with the availability of water from the drainages within the TASP Area. Removal of large, mature trees can cause direct mortality to nesting birds and their young and construction disturbance can cause nest abandonment resulting in indirect loss to avian species. The proposed project would implement TASP Policy 5.27 which would require a qualified biologist to conduct a survey that would be considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as appropriate, on a case‐by‐ case basis in certain conditions, to determine whether a project would require avoidance procedures. Implementation of General Plan Policies 4.b‐I‐4 and 4.b‐I‐5 and TASP Policy 5.27 would reduce potential impacts to nesting raptors and other birds to less‐than‐significant levels. The proposed project would be conditioned to conform to the above policies and therefore would not create impacts related to migrating wildlife that are new or more significant than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR. The proposed project would result in the removal of 17 trees on the project site and the planting of approximately 50 new trees. Therefore, the proposed project would not create impacts related to mature trees that are new or more significant than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

Cultural Resources. The project site is fully developed with two light‐industrial buildings, neither of which are considered significant historic resources under the State or federal standards for historic resources. The only historic resource in the TASP Area that is listed in the City’s Register of Cultural Resources is the Old Ford Motor Assembly Plant now known as the Great Mall, which is located approximately 0.6 miles north of the project site.

No archaeological resources have been identified on the project site. However, as noted in the TASP FEIR, the TASP Area is considered sensitive for archaeological resources. One Native American archaeological resource, CA‐SCL‐593, and a prehistoric archaeological site are located adjacent to the TASP Area. While subsurface cultural resources are not anticipated to be encountered with demolition and grading of the site, there is a chance that construction activities could affect previously‐unidentified archaeological resources on the project site. The TASP FEIR identifies Policy

5.34 to reduce the impacts to previously unidentified archaeological resources to a less‐than‐ significant level through construction monitoring, and if remains are found, temporary halting of construction until development of a mitigation plan and its implementation. Implementation of Policy 5.34 from the TASP would reduce impacts to previously unidentified archaeological resources to a less‐than‐significant level. Implementing the proposed project would not lead to new or more

2 Milpitas, City of. Draft Milpitas Metro Specific Plan. October 2021. 261
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   6 severe impacts to archaeological resources that would occur beyond those already identified in the TASP FEIR.

Energy. The TASP FEIR evaluated energy in Section 3.12, Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change.

Construction of the proposed project would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of building materials, preparation of the site for demolition and grading activities, and building construction. In order to increase energy efficiency on the site during project construction, equipment idling times would be restricted to 5 minutes or less and construction workers would be required to shut off idle equipment, as required by the BAAQMD Basic Construction Mitigation Measures. Energy usage on the project site during construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State’s available energy sources. Therefore, construction energy impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required.

As described above, the proposed project would result in the development of high‐intensity, transit‐ oriented residential uses on the site. Therefore, the proposed project would support the ability to use alternative modes of transportation, would promote initiatives to reduce vehicle trips and VMT, and would increase the use of alternate means of transportation, which would allow for a decreased dependence on nonrenewable energy resources. In addition, the proposed project would be required to be constructed to CALGreen standards, which would help to reduce energy and natural gas consumption. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of fuel or energy or conflict with California’s green energy conservation plans and would incorporate renewable energy or energy efficiency measures into building design, equipment use, and transportation.

Geology and Soils. The City of Milpitas requires projects to comply with the 2016 California Building Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations), which provides for stringent construction requirements on projects in areas of high seismic risk based on numerous inter‐related factors. It is acknowledged that seismic hazards cannot be completely eliminated, even with implementation of advanced building practices. However, the seismic design standards of the California Building Code are intended to prevent catastrophic building failure in the most severe earthquakes currently anticipated. Therefore, consistent with the findings of the TASP FEIR, compliance with the 2016 California Building Code (CBC), which is required by both the City and the State, the proposed project would not result in new impacts related to geologic hazards or substantially increase the severity of impacts than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

Policy 5.33 of the TASP also requires construction projects that disturb one or more acres to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would include erosion control best management practices that would minimize erosion during construction. Upon completion of construction, the project site would be covered with structures, pavement, and landscaping and would not include areas of exposed soil. Therefore, the proposed project would not create impacts related to erosion that would be new or more significant than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

There is the potential to encounter unidentified fossils during construction of new development.

Since fossils are considered to be nonrenewable resources, such impacts would be considered significant. Adverse impacts on paleontological resource could occur when earthwork activities such as mass excavation cut into geological formations, or depths below the soil layer, which is generally 262
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   7 six feet deep. The TASP FEIR determined that project‐specific evaluation, monitoring during construction, temporary suspension of grading, fossil recovery in the event fossils are discovered, as identified in TASP Policy 5.35 would reduce the potential impact to such resources to less‐than‐ significant levels. Implementing the proposed project would not lead to new or more severe impacts to paleontological resources that would occur beyond those already identified in the TASP FEIR.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The proposed project would adhere to the building guidelines of the TASP, would be consistent with the Milpitas Climate Action Plan, and would promote reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through high‐density development in close proximity to transit. To reduce energy usage, the project would incorporate green building measures in compliance with CALGreen standard building measures for residential buildings and Title 24 requirements.

Additionally, the proposed project would include a total of 0.42 acres of common open space and landscaped areas, following the City’s standards, which would help offset GHG emissions. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions than analyzed in the TASP FEIR and further analysis is not required.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials release sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The proposed land use would not involve transport, use, or disposal of significant quantities of hazardous materials. Generally, small quantities of hazardous materials such as paints and cleaning products would be used for routine maintenance. Therefore, a significant hazard to the public or environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would not occur and potential impacts related to operational use of hazardous materials would be less than significant.

TASP Policy 5.20 requires parcels with no identified contamination to complete a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to determine the potential for ground water, soil, or other contamination related to previous land uses. If any potential for contamination is determined to exist that could adversely affect human health for residential uses, a Phase II ESA would be required.

If appropriate, engineering controls and design measures would be required to be implemented to mitigate the potential risk of post‐development vapor intrusion into buildings.

The project site is not included on any list of facilities or sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code (i.e., the Cortese List).3 The project site does not have any known contamination. Therefore, consistent with TASP Policy 5.20, the project sponsor would be required to prepare a Phase 1 ESA, and a Phase II ESA if necessary, prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits.

Policy 5.21 of the TASP addresses hazardous materials that may be present in existing buildings such as asbestos, PCB’s, or lead. The project would also be required to comply with Section 19827.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, which requires that local agencies not issue demolition or alteration permits until an applicant has demonstrated compliance with notification requirements under applicable federal regulations regarding hazardous air pollutants, including asbestos. Also

3 California Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Cortese List Data Resources. Website:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ (accessed March 2022). 263
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   8 required is full compliance with Title 17 and Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, which includes work practice standards related to the evaluation and abatement of lead.

Consistent with the findings of the TASP FEIR, continued compliance with applicable local, State, and federal regulations and TASP policies would reduce potential exposure of people and the environment to hazardous materials associated with development of a contaminated property and demolition of older structures to a less‐than significant level and the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

The project site is located approximately three miles northeast of the San Jose International Airport.

The project site is not located within the Airport Safety Zones or Airport Influence Area of the San Jose International Airport,4 and is not located in the vicinity of a private air strip.

Hydrology and Water Quality. As previously described, the proposed project would disturb greater than one acre of land, and therefore would be required to obtain coverage under the State Water Board’s Construction General Permit. On‐site construction activities subject to the Construction General Permit include clearing, grading, excavation, and soil stockpiling. The Construction General Permit also requires the development of a SWPPP by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer.

The proposed project would replace over 10,000 square feet of existing impervious surface area, and would therefore be required to comply with Provision C.3 requirements of the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP). The project would result in alteration of over 50 percent of the existing impervious surface of the project site, and therefore all new and replaced impervious surfaces would require treatment under the MRP. The low‐impact development (LID) stormwater controls for the proposed project would include permeable pavement, bio‐retention areas, self‐treating landscape areas, mechanical treatment (filtration) of runoff from asphalt pavement, and treatment of runoff using flow through planters. Consistent with the findings of the TASP FEIR, continued compliance with applicable regulations, as described above, and TASP policies, as provided below, would not result in new impacts or substantially increase the severity of impacts than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

Operation of the proposed project would not involve dewatering or the use of groundwater as potable water, because potable water would be supplied to the project site by the City. Dewatering may be performed during construction activities involving excavation. If performed, construction‐ related dewatering would be temporary and limited to areas of excavation on the project site and would not substantially contribute to depletion of groundwater supplies.

The TASP FEIR determined that stormwater runoff would decrease with the buildout of the TASP Area, including the project site. The addition of more landscaped areas and parks would allow more precipitation to infiltrate into the ground compared with the current condition of nearly complete coverage of impervious pavement. The TASP FEIR determined that none of the existing stormwater drainage pipelines would require expansion. Developers are required to fund a Storm Drainage Plan

4 Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission, 2016. Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Santa Clara County, Norma Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport. May 25. 264
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   9 for each subdistrict within the TASP Area that includes measures to reduce runoff pollutants and control pollutant sources to the maximum extent practical. Full compliance with the Santa Clara County National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit guidelines for stormwater discharges and General Plan Policy 4.d.‐G‐1 would ensure that long‐term water quality impacts would not be significant.

The project site is located in an area designated as “Special Flood Hazard Areas Subject to Inundation By the 1 percent Annual Chance Flood” Zone AO on the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).5 The Zone AO designation indicates areas that are subject to inundation by the 1‐percent‐annual‐chance flood (also known as a 100‐year flood) event with an established base flood elevation6 or depth, and the flood depth at project site is indicated to be 1‐foot.

TASP Policy 6.1 requires projects to minimize damage associated with flooding events and comply with regulations stipulated by FEMA and the National Flood Insurance Program. TASP Policy 6.2 requires new development within a FEMA‐designated flood hazard zone to follow the City’s construction standards for such areas, as currently laid out in Section XI‐15 ‘Floodplain Management Regulations’ of the Milpitas Municipal Code. The project sponsor would be required to apply for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR‐F) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR‐F) based on area removal or structure removal from the effective FEMA floodplain and subsequently comply with all City floodplain ordinances.

Consistent with the findings of the TASP FEIR, the project would be required to comply with the TASP policies, which include compliance with FEMA requirements and the City of Milpitas Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new impacts related to flooding or substantially increase the severity of impacts than those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

Land Use and Planning. The proposed project would develop a new residential use on a site within the TASP Area that currently contains a light‐industrial use and surface parking. The proposed project would provide public access by including public sidewalks throughout the project site that connect with the existing sidewalks along Houret Drive, Houret Court, and Montague Expressway.

Therefore, the proposed project would not inhibit public connectivity, and would not physically divide a community.

As stated above, the proposed project would be consistent with the existing land use and zoning designations of the project site. The development associated with the proposed project is within the amount of growth evaluated and cleared within the TASP FEIR and is compatible with existing and future residential uses in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the density and intensity of the proposed project would not result in any new or more significant impacts regarding conformance with land use plans than those already identified in the TASP FEIR.

5 Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #06085C0069H. May

18.   6
Base flood elevation is the regulatory requirement for the elevation or flood proofing of structures. 265
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   10 Mineral Resources. The entire TASP Area, including the project site, is located in a developed urban area that does not have mineral exploration or extraction occurring in the vicinity. In addition, the TASP Area is not designated as containing mineral resource deposits of regional importance. As such the proposed project as well as the TASP would have no impacts on mineral resources.

Noise. Construction of the project would be required to adhere to the noise standards and requirements set forth in the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan. The project would implement the measures identified in the TASP for addressing noise, including providing disclosures to future residents per Policy 5.17. The City’s Noise Abatement Ordinance would restrict construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City’s General Plan Policy 6‐I‐13 would minimize construction noise impacts by restricting the hours of operation, technique, and equipment used.

Additionally, TASP Policy 5.15 requires that construction noise be mitigated to the extent feasible to reduce exposure of sensitive receptors.

TASP Policy 5.15 would require the project sponsor to demonstrate that noise and vibration exposure to sensitive receptors from construction activities has been mitigated to the extent feasible pursuant to the City’s Noise Abatement Ordinance.

The proposed project is a residential land use and would not be considered as a significant source of noise within the community that could adversely affect other nearby residential land uses.

Intermittent audible sounds produced by the proposed residential project would primarily be associated with human voices, vehicles, and mechanical ventilation equipment. Such intermittent sounds would be expected in a residential area and would result in a less‐than‐significant impact.

Therefore, the proposed project would not increase stationary source noise impacts above those analyzed in the TASP FEIR.

The TASP FEIR identified a less‐than‐significant impact related to traffic noise impacts on existing and future residential and uses with buildout of the TASP. As described previously, the proposed project would be consistent with the TASP and within the development capacity analyzed in the TASP FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would also result in a less‐than‐significant impact with regard to traffic noise increases in the community.

Population and Housing. As described above, the TASP FEIR evaluated potential environmental impacts associated with approximately 7,100 residential units and 18,000 new residents within the TASP Area. The proposed project would include the development of the project site with high‐ density residential buildings with up to 80 residential units and approximately 200 new residents.7 The population and housing units included in the proposed project would fall within the total development anticipated by the TASP FEIR, as previously mentioned. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more significant population growth and/or housing impacts than were analyzed and described in the TASP FEIR.

Public Services. The project applicant would construct the proposed project in conformance with current building codes, which require features to reduce potential fire hazards. The Milpitas Police

7 This analysis assumes a household population of 2.49 persons per dwelling unit. 266
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   11 Department would also review project design to ensure that it incorporates appropriate safety features to minimize criminal activity. As previously described, the population and housing units included in the proposed project would fall within the total development anticipated by the TASP FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the need for new or expanded fire or police facilities beyond those that were already analyzed and described in the TASP FEIR.

The proposed project would include 80 residential units within the TASP Area, which would directly increase the demand for school facilities. Polices in the General Plan and TASP would reduce the impact and include coordination with the school districts to update their comprehensive facilities plans, update school fees for developers, and consider joining use agreements for potential shared facilities. The proposed project would conform to the above policies, including TASP Policy 4.76.

Impacts to schools are significant and unavoidable and the proposed project would not affect this conclusion as the number of proposed residential units and resulting students is within the amount evaluated in the TASP FEIR. The proposed project would not result in any new or more significant school impacts beyond those identified in the TASP FEIR.

Recreation. As described in Attachment A, the proposed project would include a total of 7,820 square feet of common open spaces and 10,600 square feet of private open space. Common open space on the project site would consist of a micro dog park, seating areas with turf, and a shaded seating areas with barbeques. Private open space would consist of useable balconies and patios. The project sponsor would also be required to pay an in‐lieu parks fee consistent with TASP Policy 3.45.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more significant impacts to existing neighborhood or regional park facilities beyond those identified in the TASP FEIR.

Transportation. According to the Valley Transit Authority (who administers the Santa Clara County Congestion Management Plan) Transportation Impact Analysis Technical Guidelines, a project would create an impact on pedestrian and bike circulation if: 1) it would reduce, sever or eliminate existing or planned bike/pedestrian access and circulation in the area; 2) it would preclude, modify, or otherwise affect proposed bicycle and pedestrian projects and/or policies identified in the Lead Agency’s adopted bicycle/pedestrian plan, or the plans of other agencies such as the Countywide Bicycle Plan or adjacent Cities’ bicycle/pedestrian plans; or 3) it would cause a change to existing bike paths such as alignment, width of the trail right of way, or length of the trail.

As part of project improvements, new sidewalks would be installed long the Montague Expressway frontage. In addition, the existing driveways would be retained and therefore would not increase the number of potential vehicle and pedestrian conflict points.

The proposed project would generate pedestrian trips to/from transit stops, recreation areas, and employment centers. Overall, the volume of pedestrian trips generated by the project is expected to be relatively low and not exceed the carrying capacity of the sidewalks and crosswalks nearby. U.S.

Census data indicate that bicycle trips comprise less than one percent of the total commute mode share in the City of Milpitas. For the proposed project, this would equate to approximately one new bike trip during each of the AM and PM peak hours. The low volume of bicycle trips generated by the project would not exceed the bicycle‐carrying capacity of streets surrounding the site, and the increase in bicycle trips would not by itself require new off‐site bicycle facilities. 267
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   12 Since the time the TASP FEIR was certified, regulatory thresholds and requirements related to transportation have been updated. Effective December 28, 2018, the CEQA Guidelines were updated and require the evaluation of VMT as the criteria for analyzing transportation impacts for land use projects. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 shall apply prospectively as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15007.

The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) allows lead agencies to screen out projects with potential VMT impacts by using maps and transit availability. Specifically, OPR suggests that residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT.8 As previously described, the proposed project would include high‐density residential uses on the project site. In addition, the project site is located within the TASP area and located less than half a mile from the Milpitas Transit Center, which includes the Milpitas BART Station and bus stops for up to nine different VTA bus lines. Furthermore, a VTA‐managed bus stop is contemplated near the intersection of Montague Expressway and Houret Drive. The City, as Lead Agency, has determined that the project site is located within a low residential VMT area.9 Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new impacts related to VMT.

Tribal Cultural Resources. General Plan Policy 4.f‐G‐1 would reduce any potential impact to historical and cultural resources to a less‐than‐significant level. As previously discussed, the TASP FEIR determined that impacts to cultural and historic resources would be reduced to less‐than‐ significant levels with implementation of Policy 5.34 to reduce potential impacts to previously unidentified archaeological resources to a less‐than‐significant level through construction monitoring, and if remains are found, temporary halting of construction until development of a mitigation plan and its implementation. This finding applies to tribal cultural resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts to tribal cultural resources than were identified in the TASP FEIR.

Utilities and Service Systems. The TASP FEIR determined buildout of the TASP would create sewer flows that, when combined with other cumulative growth and development within the City, would exceed the City’s contracted capacity at the Water Pollution Control Plant. However, because the proposed project is within the level of development evaluated in the TASP FEIR, it would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to wastewater capacity and infrastructure than those previously analyzed.

The proposed project would include the installation of new storm drain lines on the project site and would connect to the existing 12‐inch municipal storm drain located within Houret Drive. The potential impacts associated with storm drainage facilities from the proposed project would not be greater or more severe than those identified in the TASP FEIR.

8 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December. 9
Milpitas, City of. 2021. City of Milpitas Transportation Analysis Policy. Attachment C: City of Milpitas Countywide Residential Average VMT. May.
268
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   13 TASP Policy 6.22 would ensure that less‐than‐significant impacts associated with water supply would occur. The TASP FEIR concluded that this water demand will be adequately served by water supplies from current sources in addition to offsets by the supplies available from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), the ability to run emergency wells, and an increased use of recycled water.

The TASP provides policies which require the use of recycled water.

The proposed project would conform to TASP policies that would reduce the impact to a less‐than‐ significant level and would not result in greater growth on the project site than anticipated by the TASP FEIR. Impacts of the proposed project would not result in any greater impacts than those identified by the TASP FEIR.

The TASP FEIR concluded that there is sufficient capacity in the existing solid waste disposal facilities serving the TASP Area, including the project site, for at least 30 more years. The proposed project would conform to TASP policies and would not result in any new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the TASP FEIR.

Wildfire. Since certification of the TASP FEIR, Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines has been revised to include a separate section for Wildfire. Effective December 28, 2018, CEQA requires the evaluation of wildfire hazards, among other changes. Because the TASP FEIR was certified prior to December 28, 2018, a separate evaluation of wildfire impacts was not included. However, the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the TASP FEIR did determine that there were no Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within the TASP Area. In addition, the project site is not located in or near any State responsibility areas. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new impacts related to wildfire hazards.

2. Substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that are related to the project have occurred since community‐level environmental review was certified or adopted.

The Milpitas General Plan Update EIR was certified on March 9, 2021. Since that time, there have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that relate to the proposed project. Conditions on the project site are similar to those that were present at the time the Milpitas General Plan Update EIR was certified.

3. New information becomes available regarding the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken and that is related to the project that was not known, and could not have been known at the time that community‐level environmental review was certified or adopted.

No new information has become available regarding the circumstances under which the proposed project is being undertaken that is related to the proposed project that was not known at the time the Milpitas General Plan Update EIR or TASP EIR was certified. 269
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   14 Section 15192. Threshold Requirements For Exemptions For Agricultural Housing, Affordable Housing, And Residential Infill Projects
In order to qualify for an exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15193, 15194 or 15195, a housing project must meet all of the threshold criteria set forth below.

A. The project must be consistent with: (1) Any applicable general plan, specific plan, or local coastal program, including any mitigation measures required by such plan or program, as that plan or program existed on the date that the application for the project pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code was deemed complete; and (2) Any applicable zoning ordinance, as that zoning ordinance existed on the date that the application for the project pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code was deemed complete, unless the zoning of project property is inconsistent with the general plan because the project property has not been rezoned to conform to the general plan.

The 2040 Milpitas General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (MMSP). The MMSP category allows for development that accommodates substantial growth, while minimizing impacts on local roadways, and reduces urban sprawl at the periphery of the region.10 The project site is zoned MXD3, which includes multi‐family housing as a permitted use.11 Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with both the general plan and zoning ordinance that existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

B. Community‐level environmental review has been adopted or certified.

As described previously, an EIR for the 2040 Milpitas General Plan was certified on March 9, 2021.

Additionally, the project site is located within the TASP, for which an EIR was certified in 2008.

C. The project and other projects approved prior to the approval of the project can be adequately served by existing utilities, and the project applicant has paid, or has committed to pay, all applicable in‐lieu or development fees.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the proposed project would connect to existing utilities via tie‐ins on Houret Drive, including connections to a 12‐inch water line, 8‐inch wastewater line, 15‐inch storm drain, and a connection to the existing joint utility trench for gas and electrical service.

D. The site of the project: (1) Does not contain wetlands, as defined in Section 328.3 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (2) Does not have any value as an ecological community upon which wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and invertebrates depend for their conservation and protection. (3) Does not harm any species protected by the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.) or by the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and

10   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan. November. 11   Milpitas, City of. 2016. City of Milpitas Parcel Map Viewer website: www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/milpitas/ departments/maps/ (accessed March 9, 2022).
270
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   15 Game Code), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code. (4) Does not cause the destruction or removal of any species protected by a local ordinance in effect at the time the application for the project was deemed complete.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the project site is currently developed with two industrial buildings that include commercial and light industrial uses, loading docks, paved surface parking, and landscaped areas, as well as approximately 19 mature trees. While the project site does include ornamental landscaping, the project site does not contain wetlands or habitat of ecological value that any special‐status animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, or invertebrates depend on for their conservation and protection.

E. The site of the project is not included on any list of facilities and sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

As previously described, the project site is not included on any list of facilities or sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code (i.e., the Cortese List).12 F. The site of the project is subject to a preliminary endangerment assessment prepared by a registered environmental assessor to determine the existence of any release of a hazardous substance on the site and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity. In addition, the following steps have been taken in response to the results of this assessment: (1) If a release of a hazardous substance is found to exist on the site, the release shall be removed, or any significant effects of the release shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal requirements. (2) If a potential for exposure to significant hazards from surrounding properties or activities is found to exist, the effects of the potential exposure shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with state and federal requirements.

As described above and in Attachment A, Project Description, the project site is located within the TASP, and therefore applicable policies from the TASP would apply. TASP Policy 5.20 requires parcels with no identified contamination to complete a Phase I ESA to determine the potential for ground water, soil, or other contamination related to previous land uses. If any potential for contamination is determined to exist that could adversely affect human health for residential uses, a Phase II ESA would be required. If appropriate, engineering controls and design measures would be required to be implemented to mitigate the potential risk of post‐development vapor intrusion into buildings.

As previously described, there is no known contamination on the project site and the project sponsor would be required to prepare a Phase I ESA, and a Phase II ESA if necessary, prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits.

12   California Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Op. cit. 271
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   16 G. The project does not have a significant effect on historical resources pursuant to Section 21084.1 of the Public Resources Code.

The project site is developed with two industrial buildings. The only historic resource in the TASP Area that is listed in the City’s Register of Cultural Resources is the Old Ford Motor Assembly Plant, now known as the Great Mall, which is located approximately 0.5 miles north of the project site.

H. The project site is not subject to wildland fire hazard, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, unless the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a wildland fire hazard.

The project site is located within a developed area of the city and is not located within a moderate, high, or very high Fire Hazard Severity Zone.13
I. The project site does not have an unusually high risk of fire or explosion from materials stored or used on nearby properties.

The project site is generally surrounded by institutional, commercial, and residential uses. None of these uses have an unusually high risk of fire or explosion from materials stored or used.

J. The project site does not present a risk of a public health exposure at a level that would exceed the standards established by any state or federal agency.

As described above, a Phase I ESA would be required to determine whether the project site has potential for ground water, soil, or other contamination that could present a risk of public health exposure. If the site does have the potential for contamination, engineering controls and design measures would be required to be implemented to mitigate the potential risk of exposure to the public.

K. Either the project site is not within a delineated earthquake fault zone or a seismic hazard zone, as determined pursuant to Section 2622 and 2696 of the Public Resources Code respectively, or the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of an earthquake or seismic hazard.

The project site is not within a delineated earthquake fault zone or seismic hazard zone.14 L. Either the project site does not present a landslide hazard, flood plain, flood way, or restriction zone, or the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance contains provisions to mitigate the risk of a landslide or flood.

13   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan (SCH No. 2020070348). Figure 3.8‐1. Fire Hazards Map. November. 14   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan (SCH No. 2020070348). Figure 3.6‐1. Earthquake Faults. November. 272
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   17 The project site is not located within a Landslide Hazard area or a Dam Inundation Area.15,16 The project site is located within a Special Flood Hazard Zone; however, the proposed project would be required to comply with Section XI‐15‐5 of the City’s Municipal Code, which includes requirements for flood hazard reduction.17
M. The project site is not located on developed open space.

As described in Attachment A, Project Description, the project site is currently developed with two industrial buildings and is not located on developed open space.

N. The project site is not located within the boundaries of a state conservancy.

The project site is not located within any State Conservancies.18 O. The project has not been divided into smaller projects to qualify for one or more of the exemptions set forth in sections 15193 to 15195.

The proposed project has not been divided into smaller projects. The proposed project has been wholly described in Attachment A, Project Description, and does not include any later phases or off‐ site activities.

OTHER EXEMPTIONS
In addition to CEQA Guidelines Section 15195, the proposed project site is located within the TASP Area, and therefore would also be exempt from further review under CEQA pursuant to Section 15168(c) of the CEQA Guidelines. A program EIR was prepared and certified for the TASP in 2008, and the proposed project could be found to be within the scope of the project described in the TASP EIR, per the discussion found above regarding potential unusual circumstances (CEQA Guidelines Section 15195(b)(1)). However, as described above, the proposed project would meet the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15195, and no further review pursuant to CEQA would be required.

CONCLUSION
As described above, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15195. Additionally, the proposed project would meet the threshold requirements described

15   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan (SCH No. 2020070348). Figure 3.6‐5. Landslide Potential. 16   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan (SCH No. 2020070348). Figure 3.9‐3. Dam Inundation Areas. 17   Milpitas, City of. 2020. Draft Environmental Impact Report – 2040 Milpitas General Plan (SCH No. 2020070348). Figure 3.9‐2. FEMA Flood Hazard Zones. 18   California Natural Resources Agency. Conservancies. Website:
https://files.resources.ca.gov/conservancies/ (accessed March 2022). 273
Item # 17.
3/25/22 (P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Final\1752‐1810 Houret Court CE.docx)   18 in CEQA Guidelines Section 15192. Therefore, an exemption is the appropriate terminal CEQA document for the proposed project.

Attachment A: Project Description
274
Item # 17.

ATTACHMENT A: P ROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARCH 2022
1752‐ 1810 HOURET COURT P ROJECT

MILPITAS , CA
P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Houret Court_Attachment A_PD.docx (03/15/22) 1

ATTACHMENT A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following describes the proposed 1752 and 1810 Houret Court Project (project). The project site is located within the planning area for the Milpitas Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP)1 . In addition to
the description of the proposed project itself, this section includes a summary description of the proposed project’s location, existing site characteristics, required approvals, and entitlements.

This attachment is part of the preparation of a Categorical Exemption prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to allow development of the proposed project. The City of Milpitas (City) is the CEQA lead agency for the project.

1.1 PROJECT SITE
The following section describes the project location, existing conditions, surrounding land uses, and the regulatory setting.

1.1.1 Project Location
The project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Milpitas, just north of the border with the City of San José. The approximately 1.92‐acre (83,635‐square‐foot) project site is made up of two parcels located at 1752 and 1810 Houret Court (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APN] 086‐41‐010 and 086‐41‐011). Regional vehicular access to the project site is provided by Interstate 880 (I‐880) located to the west and Interstate 680 (I‐680) located east of the project site. The Milpitas Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station and Montague Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) light rail station are approximately 0.2‐miles northeast of the project site. Figure 1 shows the regional and local context of the project site. Figure 2 depicts an aerial photograph of the project site and surrounding land uses (all figures are provided at the end of this Attachment A).

1.1.2 Existing Conditions
The generally level project site is currently developed with two industrial buildings that include commercial and light industrial uses, loading docks, paved surface parking, and landscaped areas, as well as approximately 19 mature trees.

1.1.3 Surrounding Land Uses
The project site is located within a light industrial area of Milpitas that is predominantly developed with commercial office parks and other buildings for industrial and commercial uses. The project site is bordered to the north by Houret Drive and multi‐family residential uses, Montague Expressway to the east and south, and Houret Court and multi‐family and commercial uses to the west. The project site is in close proximity to the Great Mall shopping center in Milpitas, approximately 0.4 miles north of the project site.

1 Milpitas, City of. 2008. Milpitas Transit Area Specific Plan. June. Amended December 2011. 275
Item # 17.
1752‐ 1810 HOURET COURT P ROJECT

MILPITAS , CA
ATTACHMENT A: P ROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARCH 2022
2 P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Houret Court_Attachment A_PD.docx (03/15/22)

1.1.4 Regulatory Framework
The City adopted the 2040 Milpitas General Plan on March 9, 2021, which replaced the General Plan adopted in 1994. The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (MMSP), which is intended to create a structure for a walkable, transit‐oriented area with a mix of land uses. The project site is zoned Very High Density Mixed Use (MXD3).2 The purpose of the MXD3 zoning district is to provide very‐high density housing, retail, and employment uses.

Multi‐family housing uses are permitted within the MXD3 zoning district.

The project site is also located within the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP). The TASP is a guide for development and redevelopment of the southern, light industrial corridor of Milpitas that is located in the vicinity of the BART station. The goal of the TASP is to create an attractive and livable neighborhood that is within walking distance to BART and to transform the older, light industrial district to meet high demand for housing, offices and shopping in Milpitas. The TASP was designed to accommodate substantial growth, minimize impacts on local roadways, and reduce urban sprawl at the periphery of the region. The proposed project would be located near the Milpitas BART station and supports the objectives of the TASP. The TASP FEIR was certified in 2008 and evaluates the environmental impacts of 7,100 units of residential development, a population increase of 18,000 new residents, the creation of 4,200 new jobs and development of 1 million square feet of office space, 285,000 square feet of retail space, and 175,000 square feet of hotels.

The TASP planning area is nearing the planned buildout identified in the TASP FEIR. The public review draft of the MMSP was made available for comment in late 2021, and is anticipated to be adopted by December 2022, at which point the MMSP would supersede the TASP.

1.2 PROPOSED PROJECT
The project sponsor, City Ventures, proposes to demolish the existing buildings and associated improvements on the project site and construct eight residential buildings that would contain 56 townhome‐style condominium units, 24 of which would include ground floor accessible dwelling units (ADUs), for a total of 80 residential units. Associated circulation, parking, landscaping, and infrastructure improvements would also be developed. Figure 3 shows a conceptual site plan, Figures 4 and 5 show typical conceptual floor plans, and Figure 6 shows typical conceptual building elevations.

Table A.1 shows the housing units and population assumptions evaluated within the TASP FEIR, the number of approved units and under construction units and inclusion of the proposed project. As shown, the development associated with the proposed project is within the amount of growth evaluated and cleared within the TASP FEIR.

2 Milpitas, City of. 2016. City of Milpitas Parcel Map Viewer website: www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/milpitas/ departments/maps/ (accessed April 23, 2021).
276
Item # 17.

ATTACHMENT A: P ROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARCH 2022
1752‐ 1810 HOURET COURT P ROJECT

MILPITAS , CA
P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Houret Court_Attachment A_PD.docx (03/15/22) 3 Table A.1: Existing and Proposed Housing Units and Population within the TASP Area Evaluated Within the

TASP FEIR
Approved and
Pending Proposed Project
Remaining
Development
Available
Housing Units 7,109a 6,783 80 246
Population 17,915a 17,093b 202b 620b
Source: Riley, Kevin, 2022. Metro Plan (TASP) Manager, Planning Department, City of Milpitas. February 7. a Milpitas, City of, 2008. Final Transit Area Specific Plan EIR. This total does not include the 468 units associated with The Crossings. b Estimated population associated with approved units, under construction units, and the proposed project was determined by using the residents per unit evaluated within the TASP FEIR (17,915 residents/7,109 units = 2.52 residents per unit).

1.2.1 Building Program
As noted above, the proposed project would consist of 80 residential dwelling units within eight buildings. The buildings would range in size from approximately 5,220 to 14,618 square feet, and would all be four stories and approximately 47 feet, 6 inches in height. The proposed project would include 32 two‐bedroom units that would be approximately 1,044 square feet in size and 24 three‐ bedroom units that would be approximately 2,136 square feet in size. The ADUs would be located on the ground floor of the three‐bedroom units, and approximately 280 square feet in size. A total of eight townhome‐style condominium units would be affordable to moderate incomes, as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, specifically based on Santa Clara County median income levels (adjusted for family size). Prior to building permit issuance, an executed agreement imposing appropriate rental restrictions on the affordable units would be required.

1.2.2 Landscaping and Open Space
The proposed project would include a total of 7,820 square feet of common open spaces and 10,600 square feet of private open space. Common open space on the project site would consist of a micro dog park, seating areas with turf, and a shaded seating areas with barbeques. Private open space would consist of useable balconies and patios. Landscaping would also be provided around the site’s perimeter, as shown in Figure 3. A total of 17 trees would be removed during construction of the proposed project, and up to 50 new trees would be planted.

1.2.3 Access, Circulation and Parking
The project site would be accessed via new driveways along Houret Drive and Houret Court. The driveways would provide access to an internal road running through the center of the project site.

Each of the two‐ and three‐bedroom units would have either a one‐ or two‐car garage, for a total of 80 covered parking spaces, all of which would be accessible from the internal roadway. An additional four street parking spaces would be provided near the Houret Court driveway for a total of 84 parking spaces. The proposed project would also include six short‐term bicycle parking spaces through the site.
277
Item # 17.
1752‐ 1810 HOURET COURT P ROJECT

MILPITAS , CA
ATTACHMENT A: P ROJECT DESCRIPTION
MARCH 2022
4 P:\MLP1902.10 1752‐1810 Houret Court\PRODUCTS\CE\Houret Court_Attachment A_PD.docx (03/15/22)

1.2.4 Utilities and Infrastructure
The proposed project would require utility services including water, wastewater, storm drain, gas, electrical, and telecommunications. The proposed project would connect to existing utilities via tie‐ ins on Houret Drive, including connections to a 12‐inch water line, 8‐inch wastewater line, 15‐inch storm drain line, and a connection to the existing joint utility trench for gas and electrical service.

The project site currently includes a total of 79,459 square feet of impervious surface area (95 percent). The proposed project would result in a decrease in impervious surface area on the project site of 9,754 square feet. Roofs, roads, concrete driveways and other infrastructure would result in a total of 69,705 square feet of impervious surfaces (83 percent of the site). A mechanical storm drain treatment system would be installed within the proposed driveway to treat and handle stormwater flows prior to discharge to the City’s stormwater drainage system.

1.2.5 Project Construction
Subsurface excavations for the foundations and utilities would likely occur to a depth of six to seven feet. A total of approximately 4,550 tons of construction debris are anticipated to be removed from the project site during demolition of the existing buildings. The construction period is anticipated to begin in by October 2022 and would occur over an approximately 24‐month period. Occupancy of the units could occur as early as September 2023.

1.3 AMENDMENTS AND PERMITS
As previously discussed, the proposed project involves an application for a specific development proposal for 1752 and 1810 Houret Court. As part of the proposed project evaluated in this Categorical Exemption, the following approvals and permits would be required:
 Site Development Permit
 Conditional Use Permit
 Vesting Tentative Map
 Density Bonus Application
 Tree Removal Permit
 Demolition Permit
 Building Permit
The project applicant is requesting use of the density bonus to reduce the amount of parking required. In addition, the project applicant is requesting a waiver for the setback standards along all property lines.

278
Item # 17.

SOURCE: ESRI World Maps (10/2019).

I:\MLP1902.10\GIS\Maps\Figure 1_Regional Location.mxd (3/1/2022) FIGURE 1
1752-1810 Houret Court Categorical Exemption
Regional Location
Project Location
Project Site
0 500 1000
FEET
LEGEND
Project Site
279
Item # 17.

Montague Expy Montague Expy
Ironwood Ln Ironwood Ln
Montague Expy Montague Expy
Trade Zone Blvd
ExpediƟon Ln
Willow Ave Willow Ave
E Capitol Ave E Capitol Ave
McCandless Dr Ringwood Ave
Houret Ct Houret Ct
Houret Dr Houret Dr
Momentum Dr
Sango Ct
Centre Pointe Dr
Centre Pointe Dr
Bond St Bond St
Montague Expy
Ironwood Ln
Montague Expy
Trade Zone Blvd
ExpediƟon Ln
Willow Ave
E Capitol Ave
McCandless Dr
Ringwood Ave
Houret Ct
Houret Dr
Momentum Dr
Sango Ct
Centre Pointe Dr
Centre Pointe Dr
Bond St

MABEL MATTOS

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ARK

BAPTIST
CHURCH

MULTI-FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
USES
0 200 400
Project Site Boundary
FEET
SOURCES: Google Earth, 9/4/2020; LSA, 2022
I:\MLP1902.10\G\Fig 2_Aerial Photo&Surrounding LU.ai (3/1/2022) FIGURE 2
1752-1810 Houret Court Categorical ExempƟon
Aerial Photograph and Surrounding Land Uses
280
Item # 17.
1 2
3 10 11 7
12 4
4 4
6 4
9 8
5 MONTAGUE EXPRESSWAY
HOUR
E
T DR
IVE

HOURET COURT
LEGEND
Micro Dog Park with BenchesSeaƟng are with TurfShadeed seaƟng with BarbecuePaƟoDecoraƟve paving in alleyTurf block in EVA Right-of-wayTurf areaShort term bike parking [6 spaces]Mailboxes 56 9
1011
4 12321
EV and ADA ParkingConcrete walk
78 0 20 40
FEET
SOURCES: City Ventures; C2 CollaboraƟve, January 27, 2022 I:\MLP1902.10\G\Fig 3_Proposed Conceptual Site Plan.ai (2/28/2022) FIGURE 3
1752 - 1810 Houret Court Categorical ExempƟon
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
281
Item # 17.
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
UP
17R
R OO AR. D G T. C 6'-0" x 7'-0" SE 1
12'-10" X 16'-4"

RECYCLE
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
TRASH
96 GA

25.1"X34.3"X44.5"
BATH
C
UP
ENTRY
ENTRY
21'-0" 21'-0" 2'-5"
16'-0"

FIRST FLOOR
50 50 SH 26 50 SH 50 50
SH 26 50 SH 50 50SH 26 50 SH 50 50 SH 26 50 SH
LIVING
13'-0" X 15'-6" 0
25'-8"
64'-6"
16'-0"16'-0"16'-0"16'-0"

SECOND FLOOR
CODE ANALYSISCONSTRUCTION TYPE: VAOCCUPANCY: R2COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH
WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

UNIT ANALYSISUNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK3 BEDROOM + BONUS2 BATH + 2 PDR2-CAR GARAGE
UNIT ANALYSISUNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE
04 8
FEET
SOURCES: City Ventures; WHA., January 27, 2022I:\MLP1902.10\G\Fig 4_Prop Concept Typical Flr Plans-1st-2nd Flrs.ai (2/28/2022) FIGURE 4
1752 - 1810 Houret Court Categorical ExempƟon
Proposed Conceptual Typical Floor Plans - First and Second Floors 282
Item # 17.
0 30 5 HS 0 30 5
EAD CLR. H
/-7'-2" +
SH 50 30
24 68
SH 05 03
HEAD CLR.
+/-7'-2"
30 50 SH
DECK
13'-0" X 13'-9"
21'-0" 25'-8"
64'-6"
16'-0"
16'-0"16'-0"
16'-0"

FOURTH FLOOR THIRD FLOOR
HS 05 30
60 50
SH
HS 50 60

MASTER BEDROOM A
11'-7" X 11'-11" 1
25'-8"
16'-0"
CODE ANALYSISCONSTRUCTION TYPE: VAOCCUPANCY: R2COMMON WALL DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION: 1HR SPRINKLER SYSTEM: FULL 13
NOTE: FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHICH
WILL INCLUDE A VAPOR BARRIER AND PASSIVE VENTING TO BE INSTALLED AT TIME OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION AS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MILPITAS BUILDING DEPARTMENT).

NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
PER 11-24-21 ACOUSTICAL STUDY BY VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES.

UNIT ANALYSISUNIT PLAN 2 - TYPICAL
2,136 SF TH / LIVING280 SF ADU
456 SF GARAGE
339 SF DECK3 BEDROOM + BONUS2 BATH + 2 PDR2-CAR GARAGE
UNIT ANALYSISUNIT PLAN 1 - TYPICAL
1,044 SF LIVING
283 SF GARAGE
77 SF DECK
1 BEDROOM + DEN

2.5 BATH
1-CAR GARAGE
04 8
FEET
SOURCES: City Ventures; WHA., January 27, 2022I:\MLP1902.10\G\Fig 5_Prop Concept Typical Flr Plans-3rd-4th Flrs.ai (2/28/2022) FIGURE 5
1752 - 1810 Houret Court Categorical ExempƟon
Proposed Conceptual Typical Floor Plans - Third and Fourth Floors 283
Item # 17.

Right Rear
LeŌ Front

NOT TO SCALE
SOURCES: City Ventures; WHA., January 27, 2022I:\MLP1902.10\G\Fig 6_Proposed Conceptual Typical ElevaƟons.ai (3/1/2022) FIGURE 6
1752 - 1810 Houret Court Categorical ExempƟon
Proposed Conceptual Typical ElevaƟons
284
Item # 17.

AGENDA ITEM: IX-1

MILPITAS PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
April 27, 2022
APPLICATION: CITY VENTURES TOWNHOMES – 1752-1810 HOURET COURT – P-SD21-0012, P-UP21-0006, P-MT21-0002, P-DB21-
0001, P-TR21-0035, AND P-EA21-0004. A Site Development
Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Density Bonus Permit, Tree Removal Permit, and Environmental
Assessment to allow demolition of two industrial buildings, removal and replacement of 17 ordinance-sized trees, and development of 56 townhome condominiums and 24 accessory dwelling units. The residential development will consist of eight multi-family residential buildings up to 48 feet in height (four stories), with 84 vehicle parking spaces and associated site improvements on a 1.92-acre site located in the Very High-Density Mixed-Use (MXD3) Zoning District at 1752-1810 Houret Court.

The Project is located within the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP) area and submitted under California Senate Bill 330 (Housing Crisis Act of 2019).

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open and close the public hearing, consider the exemptions in accordance with CEQA, and adopt Resolution No. 22-005, recommending that the City Council approve Site Development Permit No. SD21- 0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP21-0006, Vesting Tentative Map MT21-0002, Density Bonus Permit No. DB21-0001, Tree Removal Permit No. TR21-0035 and Environmental Assessment No. EA21-0004, subject to the Conditions of Approval.

PROJECT LOCATION:

Addresses and Assessor's
Parcel Number (APN): 1752-1810 Houret Court (086-41-010,011) Area of City: Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP): Montague Corridor Subdistrict North of Montague Expressway / East of McCandless Drive PEOPLE:

Project Applicant: Samantha Hauser, Senior Vice President of Development City Ventures, San Francisco, CA
Consultant(s): Architect: WHA, Newport Beach, CA
Civil Engineer: VER Consultants, San Jose, CA
Landscape Architect: C2 Collaborative, San Clemente, CA Property Owner: Richard Fagen, San Jose, CA
Rachel & John Garcia, Cupertino, CA
285
Item # 17.

Page 2 of 24 ends
← All documents from this meeting