a.
Grant
of
Option
to
Purchase.
Owner
hereby
grants
to
the
Authority
an
option
("Option")
to
purchase
all
of
Owner's
right,
title
and
interest
in
and
to
the
Property
upon
the
occurrence
of
an
Option
Event
(defined
in
Paragraph
3.c
below),
subject
to
the
terms
and
conditions
contained
herein.
b.
Assignment
of
the
Option.
The
Authority
may
assign
the
Option
to
another
government
entity,
a
non-profit
affordable
housing
provider
or
a
person
or
family
that
qualifies
as
an
Eligible
Household.
The
Authority's
assignment
of
the
Option
shall
not
extend
any
time
limits
contained
herein
with
respect
to
the
exercise
period
of
the
Option
or
the
period
within
which
the
Property
must
be
purchased.
.
c.
Events
Giving
Rise
to
Right
to
Exercise
Option.
The
Authority
shall
have
the
right
to
exercise
its
Option
upon
the
occurrence
of
any
of
the
following
events
(each,
an
"Option
Event"):
i.
Receipt
of
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
(defined
in
Paragraph
3.d.i
below);
ii.
Any
actual,
attempted
or
pending
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease
or
other
attempted
disposition
of
the
Property
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
except
as
provided
in
Paragraph
1 0
below;
iii.
Any
actual,
attempted
or
pending
encumbrance
of
the
Property,
including
without
limitation
by
way
of
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust,
or
by
judgment,
mechanics,
tax
or
other
lien,
except
as
provided
in
Paragraph
9 below;
iv.
Recordation
of
a
notice
of
default
and/or
notice
of
sale
pursuant
to
California
Civil
Code
section
2924
(or
successor
provisions)
under
any
deed
of
trust
or
mortgage
with
a
power
of
sale
encumbering
the
Property;
v.
Commencement
of
a
judicial
foreclosure
proceeding
regarding
the
Property;
vi.
Execution
by
Owner
of
any
deed
in
lieu
of
foreclosure
transferring
ownership
of
the
Property;
vii.
Commencement
of
a
proceeding
or
action
in
bankruptcy,
whether
voluntary
or
involuntary,
pursuant
to
Title
1 1
of
the
United
States
Code
or
other
bankruptcy
statute,
or
any
other
insolvency,
reorganization,
arrangement,
assignment
for
the
benefit
of
creditors,
receivership
or
trusteeship,
concerning
the
Owner;
or
viii.
Any
violation
by
Owner
of
any
provision
of
this
Agreement
including,
without
limitation,
the
conditions
set
forth
in
Paragraph
2 above.
d.
Method
of
Exercising
the
Option.
i.
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer.
If
Owner
desires
to
sell,
convey,
transfer
(other
than
pursuant
to
Paragraph
9),
lease,
encumber
(other
than
pursuant
to
Paragraph
1 0)
or
otherwise
dispose
of
the
Property
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
no
less
than
60 days
prior
to
the
date
of
such
proposed
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease,
encumbrance
or
disposition,
Owner
shall
notify
Authority
in
writing
to
that
effect
(the
"Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer").
The
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
shall
be
in
substantially
the
form
attached
hereto
as
Exhibit
B.
In
the
case
of
a
proposed
sale
of
the
Property
to
an
identified
prospective
purchaser,
the
Owner
shall
submit
to
the
Authority,
together
with
the
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer,
a
copy
of
the
prospective
purchaser's
income
certification,
a
list
of
all
assets
owned
by
the
prospective
purchaser,
and
other
financial
information
reasonably
requested
by
Authority,
in
a
form
approved
by
the
Authority,
along
with
the
income
certification
to
be
provided
to
any
lender
making
a
loan
to
the
prospective
purchaser.
The
Authority
may
require
documentation
evidencing
and
supporting
the
income
and
other
financial
information
contained
in
the
certifications.
ii.
Notice
of
Exercise.
Upon
the
occurrence
of
any
Option
Event,
the
Authority
may
exercise
its
Option
by
delivering
notice,
pursuant
to
Paragraph
16 and
within
the
time
period
specified
in
Paragraph
3(d)(iv),
to
Owner
of
Authority's
intent
to
exercise
such
Option
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
this
Agreement
("Notice
of
Exercise").
The
Notice
of
Exercise
may
be
in
the
form
attached
hereto
and
incorporated
herein
as
Exhibit
C.
or
in
such
other
form
as
the
Authority
may
from
time
to
time
adopt.
If
the
Option
Event
relates
to
the
potential
foreclosure
of
a
mortgage
under
Paragraphs
3.c.iv,
3.c.v,
or
3.c.vi,
then
the
Authority
shall
also
deliver
the
Notice
of
Exercise
to
the
mortgagee
or
beneficiary
under
such
mortgage,
at
such
mortgagee's
or
beneficiary's
address
of
record
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
Santa
Clara
County.
iii.
Notice
of
Consent
to
Transfer.
If
the
Authority
does
not
exercise
the
Option,
it
may
give
its
consent
to
the
occurrence
of
the
Option
Event
("Consent
to
Transfer").
If
the
Option
Event
involves
a
proposed
sale
of
the
Property
to
a
prospective
purchaser,
the
Authority's
consentshall
be
conditioned
upon
(i)
the
proposed
purchaser's
qualification
as
an
Eligible
Household;
(ii)
the
sale
of
the
Property
at
a
price
not
to
exceed
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price;
(iii)
the
proposed
purchaser's
execution
of
a
Disclosure
Statement
in
the
form
attached
hereto
as
Exhibit
F
or
such
other
form
or
forms
as
may
be
promulgated
by
the
Authority
;
and
(iv)
the
proposed
purchaser's
assumption
of
Owner's
duties
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
pursuant
to
a
written
assumption
agreement
in
a
form
acceptable
to
Authority,
or
execution
of
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement,
within
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
Consent
to
Transfer
has
been
delivered
to
Owner
and
recordation
of
such
assumption
agreement
or
substitute
agreement.
If
the
prospective
purchaser
(i)
fails
to
qualify
as
an
Eligible
Household,
(ii)
fails
to
execute
and
deliver
the
Disclosure
Statement
to
the
Authority,
or
(iii)
fails
to
execute
and
deliver
to
the
Authority
an
assumption
agreement
or
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement
within
such
sixty
(60)
day
period,
then
the
Consent
to
Transfer
shall
expire
and
the
Authority
may,
at
its
option,
either
notify
Owner
of
the
disqualification,
thereby
entitling
Owner
to
locate
another
purchaser
who
qualifies
as
Eligible
Household,
or
exercise
the
Option,
as
if
no
Consent
to
Transfer
had
been
delivered.
iv.
Time
Period
for
Notice.
The
Authority
shall
deliver
a
Consent
to
Transfer,
if
applicable,
not
later
than
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
date
that
it
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event.
The
Authority
shall
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise,
if
applicable,
on
or
before
the
date
which
is
the
later
to
occur
of
the
following:
(i)
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
date
that
the
Authority
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event
or
(ii)
thirty
(30)
days
after
a
Consent
to
Transfer
has
expired.
For
purposes
of
computing
commencement
of
the
delivery
periods,
the
Authority
shall
be
deemed
to
have
received
notification
of
an
Option
Event
on
the
date
of
delivery
of
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer,
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
Paragraph
1 6
below
or
on
the
date
it
actually
receives
notice
of
default,
summons
and
complaint
or
other
pleading,
or
other
writing
specifically
stating
that
an
Option
Event
has
occurred.
The
Authority
shall
have
no
obligation
to
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer,
and
the
applicable
time
period
for
exercise
of
the
Option
shall
not
commence
to
run,
unless
and
until
the
Agency
has
received
notification
of
an
Option
Event
in
the
manner
specified
in
this
subparagraph.
If
there
is
a
stay
or
injunction
imposed
by
court
order
precluding
the
Authority
from
delivering
its
Consent
to
Transfer
or
Notice
of
Exercise
within
the
applicable
time
period,
then
the
running
of
such
period
shall
cease
until
such
time
as
the
stay
is
lifted
or
the
injunction
is
dissolved
and
the
Authority
has
been
given
written
notice
thereof,
at
which
time
the
period
for
delivery
of
a
Consent
to
Transfer
or
Notice
of
Exercise
shall
again
begin
to
run.
v.
Notice
of
Abandonment.
If
the
Authority
fails
to
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer
within
the
time
periods
set
forth
in
paragraph
3.d.iv,
upon
request
by
Owner,
the
Authority
shall
cause
to
be
filed
for
recordation
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
Santa
Clara
County,
a
notice
of
abandonment,
which
shall
declare
that
the
provisions
of
the
Option
are
no
longer
applicable
to
the
Property.
Unless
Owner
requests
recordation
of
notice
of
abandonment
within
30 days
of
the
Authority's
failure
to
deliver
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer,
the
Authority
shall
have
no
obligation
to
record
the
notice
of
abandonment.
Upon
recordation
of
a
notice
of
abandonment,
the
Option
shall
terminate
and
have
no
further
force
and
effect.
If
the
Authority
fails
to
record
a
notice
of
abandonment,
the
sole
remedy
of
Owner
shall
be
to
obtain
a
judicial
order.
instructing
prompt
recordation
of
such
a
notice.
vi.
Right
to
Reinstatement.
If
the
Option
Event
is
the
recordation
of
a
notice
of
default,
then
the
Agency
shall
be
deemed
to
be
Owner's
successor
in
interest
under
California
Civil
Code
Section
2924c
(or
successor
section)
solely
for
purposes
of
reinstatement
of
any
mortgage
on
the
Property
that
has
led
to
the
recordation
of
the
notice
of
default.
As
Owner's
deemed
successor
in
interest,
the
Authority
shall
be
entitled
to
pay
all
amounts
of
principal,
interest,
taxes,
assessments,
homeowners'
association
fees,
insurance
premiums,
advances,
costs,
attorneys'
fees
and
expenses
required
to
cure
the
default.
If
the
Agency
exercises
the
Option,
then
any
and
all
amounts
paid
by
the
Authority
pursuant
to
this
Paragraph
shall
be
treated
as
Adjustments
to
the
Base
Resale
Price
for
the
Property,
as
defined
in
Paragraph
5 below.
vii.
Inspection
of
Property.
After
receiving
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
transfer
or
delivering
a
Notice
of
Exercise,
the
Authority
shall
be
entitled
to
inspect
the
Property
one
or
more
times
prior
to
the
close
of
escrow
to
determine
the
amount
of
any
Adjustments
to
the
Base
Resale
Price.
Before
inspecting
the
Property,
the
Authority
shall
give
Owner
not
less
than
forty-eight
(48)
hours'
written
notice
of
the
date,
time
and
expected
duration
of
the
inspection.
The
inspection
shall
be
conducted
between
the
hours
of
9:00
a.m.
and
5:00
p.m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
court
holidays,
unless
the
parties
mutually
agree
in
writing
to
another
date
and
time.
Owner
shall
make
the
Property
available
for
inspection
on
the
date
and
at
the
time
specified
in
the
Authority's
request
for
inspection.
viii.
Escrow.
Promptly
after
delivering
a
Notice
of
Exercise,
the
Authority
shall
open
an
escrow
account
for
its
purchase
of
the
Property.
Close
of
escrow
shall
take
place
on
the
date
that
is
the
later
to
occur
of
the
following,
(a)
ninety
(90)
days
after
a
Notice
of
Exercise
has
been
delivered,
or
(b)
ten
(10)
days
after
Owner
has
performed
all
acts
and
executed
all
documents
required
for
close
of
escrow.
Prior
to
the
close
of
escrow,
the
Authority
shall
deposit
into
escrow
with
a
title
company
of
Authority's
choosing,
an
amount
equal
to
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price
as
defined
in
Paragraph
5 below
and
all
escrow
fees
and
closing
costs
to
be
paid
by
Authority.
Commissions
(not
to
exceed
6%
of
the
actual
sales
price),
closing
costs
and
title
insurance
shall
be
paid
pursuant
to
the
custom
and
practice
in
the
County
of
Santa
Clara
at
the
time
of
the
opening
of
escrow,
or
as
may
otherwise
be
provided
by
mutual
agreement.
Owner
agrees
to
perform
all
acts
and
execute
all
documents
reasonably
necessary
to
effectuate
the
close
of
escrow
and
transfer
of
the
Property
to
the
Authority.
ix.
Proceeds
of
Escrow;
Removal
of
Exceptions
to
Title.
Prior
to
close
of
escrow,
Owner
shall
cause
the
removal
of
all
exceptions
to
title
to
the
Property
that
were
recorded
after
the
Effective
Date
with
the
exception
of
(i)
taxes
for
the
fiscal
year
in
which
the
escrow
for
this
transaction
closes,
which
taxes
shall
be
prorated
as
between
Owner
and
Authority
as
of
the
date
of
close
of
escrow;
(ii)
quasi-public
utility,
public
alley,
public
street
easements,
and
rights
of
way
of
record,
and
(iii)
such
other
liens,
encumbrances,
reservations
and
restrictions
as
may
be
approved
in
writing
by
Authority
("Permitted
Exceptions").
The
purchase
price
deposited
into
escrow
by
the
Authority
shall
be
applied
first
to
the
payment
of
any
and
all
Permitted
Encumbrances
(as
defined
in
Paragraph
10)
recorded
against
the
Property
in
order
of
lien
priority,
and
thereafter
to
the
payment
of
Owner's
share
of
escrow
fees
and
closing
costs.
Any
amounts
remaining
after
the
purchase
price
has
been
so
applied,
if
any,
shall
be
paid
to
Owner
upon
the
close
of
escrow.
If
the
purchase
price
is
insufficient
to
satisfy
all
liens
and
encumbrances
recorded
against
the
Property,
the
Owner
shall
deposit
into
escrow
such
additional
sums
as
may
be
required
to
remove
said
liens
and
encumbrances.
In
the
event
that
the
Authority
agrees
to
proceed
with
close
of
escrow
prior
to
the
date
that
Owner
has
caused
all
exceptions
to
title
recorded
after
the
Effective
Date
other
than
Permitted
Exceptions
to
be
removed,
then
Owner
shall
indemnify,
defend
and
hold
Authority
harmless
from
any
and
all
.
costs
expenses
or
liabilities
(including
attorneys'
fees)
incurred
or
suffered
by
Authority
that
relate
to
such
exceptions
and
their
removal
as
exceptions
to
title
to
the
Property.
4. Base
Resale
Price.
Prior
to
adjustment
pursuant
to
Paragraph
5 the
base
resale
price
("Base
Resale
Price")
of
the
Property
shall
be
the
lowest
of:
$301,000.00
a.
Median
Income.
The
original
price
("Base
Price")
paid
by
Owner
for
acquisition
of
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
increased
(but
not
decreased)
by
an
amount,
if
any,
equal
to
the
Base
Price
multiplied
by
the
percentage
increase
in
the
median
household
income
("Median
Income")
for
Santa
Clara
County
published
by
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development,
Division
of
Housing
Policy
Development,
between
the
Effective
Date
and
the
date
that
the
Authority
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event;
or
b.
Index
Price.
The
Base
Price
increased
(but
not
decreased)
by
an
amount,
if
any,
equal
to
the
Base
Price
multiplied
by
the
percentage
increase
in
the
Consumer
Price
Index
for
All
Urban
Consumers
for
the
San
Francisco-Oakland-San
Jose
published
by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
("Index")
between
the
Recording
Date
and
the
date
that
the
City
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event;
or
c.
Fair
Market
Value.
The
fair
market
value
of
the
Property
as
determined
by
an
appraiser
selected
and
paid
for
by
Owner
and
approved
in
writing
by
the
Authority
d.
Compute
the
Base
Resale
Price,
the
Authority
may
use
the
Base
Resale
Price
Worksheet
attached
as
Exhibit
D
hereto,
or
such
other
form
as
the
Authority
may
from
time
to
time
adopt.
5. Adjustments
to
Base
Resale
Price.
Subject
to
the
Affordable
Unit
Cost
restriction
described
in
subparagraph
(d)
below,
the
Base
Resale
Price
shall
be
increased
or
decreased,
as
applicable,
by
the
following
adjustment
factors
("Adjustment"):
a.
Capital
Improvements.
An
increase
for
capital
improvements
made
to
the
Property,
but
only
if
the
amount
of
such
improvements
has
been
previously
approved
in
writing
by
the
Authority
after
Owner
has
submitted
original
written
documentation
of
the
cost
to
the
Authority
for
verification.
The
amount
of
the
Adjustment
shall
equal
the
original
cost
of
any
such
capital
improvements.
b.
Damages.
A
decrease
by
the
amount
necessary
to
repair
damage
to
the
Property,
if
any,
and
to
place
the
Property
into
saleable
condition
as
reasonably
determined
by
the
Authority
upon
Authority's
exercise
of
its
Option
hereunder,
including,
without
limitation,
amounts
attributed
to
cleaning;
painting;
replacing
worn
carpeting
and
draperies;
making
necessary
structural,
mechanical,
electrical
and
plumbing
repairs;
and
repairing
or
replacing
built-in
appliances
and
fixtures.
Owner
hereby
covenants
to,
at
Owner's
expense,
maintain
the
Property
in
the
same
condition
as
in
existence
on
the
date
of
Authority's
Notice
of
Exercise,
reasonable
wear
and
tear
excepted.
c.
Advances
by
the
Authority.
A
decrease
in
an
amount
equal
to
the
sum
of
all
costs
advanced
by
the
Authority
for
the
payment
of
mortgages,
taxes,
assessments,
insurance
premiums,
homeowner's
association
fees
and/or
associated
late
fees,
costs,
penalties,
interest,
attorneys'
fees,
pest
inspections,
resale
inspections
and
other
expenses
related
to
the
Property,
which
Owner
has
failed
to
pay
or
has
permitted
to
become
delinquent.
d.
Adjusted
Resale
Price
Not
to
Exceed
Affordable
Unit
Cost.
The
Base
Resale
Price
as
adjusted,
is
hereinafter
referred
to
as
the
"Adjusted
Resale
Price."
Notwithstanding
any
other
provision
hereof
to
the
contrary,
in
no
event
shall
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price
exceed
the
Affordable
Unit
Cost.
6. Priority
and
Effectiveness
of
the
Option.
a.
Recordation.
This
Agreement
shall
be
recorded
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
the
County
of
Santa
Clara
on
or
as
soon
as
practicable
after
the
Effective
Date.
The
Option
shall
have
priority
over
any
subsequent
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease
or
other
disposition
or
encumbrance
of
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
and
in
the
event
of
exercise
of
the
Option
by
Authority,
the
Authority
shall
take
the
Property
subject
only
to
Permitted
Exceptions.
Except
as
otherwise
provided
in
Paragraph
7.a,
the
exercise
of
the
Option
by
the
Authority
at
any
time
and
from
time
to
time
shall
not
extinguish
the
Option
or
cause
a
merger
of
the
Option
into
any
estate
or
other
interest
in
the
Property,
and
the
Option
shall
continue
to
exist
and
be
effective
with
respect
to
the
Property
against
any
and
all
subsequent
owners
in
accordance
with
the
terms
and
conditions
hereof.
b.
Request
for
Notice
of
Default.
The
Authority
shall
file
a
Request
for
Notice
of
Default
for
recordation
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
the
County
of
Santa
Clara
promptly
upon
execution
of
this
Agreement
(see
Exhibit
El.
7. Survival
of
Option
Upon
Transfer.
a.
In
General.
The
Authority's
right
to
exercise
the
Option
shall
survive
any
transfer
of
the
Property
by
Owner.
Each
transferee,
assignee
or
purchaser
of
the
Property
during
the
term
hereof
shall
be
required
to
execute
an
agreement
substantially
in
the
form
of
this
Agreement,
provided
that
the
term
of
any
such
agreement
shall
be
for-the
duration
of
the
term
hereof
as
of
the
date
of
any
such
transfer,
assignment
or
sale.
The
Option
may
be
exercised
against
the
Property
throughout
the
term
hereof,
regardless
of
whether
the
Property
is
owned,
possessed
or
occupied
by
Owner
or
any
successor,
transferee,
assignee,
heir,
executor,
or
administrator
of
Owner,
regardless
of
household
income
(if
applicable)
including
a
debtor-in-
possession,
debtor
or
trustee
pursuant
to
Title
1 1
of
the
United
States
Code.
Notwithstanding
the
'
foregoing,
the
Option
shall
not
survive
(i)
the
sale
and
transfer
of
the
Property
to
a
third
party
purchaser
pursuant
to
a
judicial
or
non-judicial
foreclosure
or
a
deed-in-lieu
of
foreclosure
under
a
power
of
sale
contained
in
a
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust
held
by
an
institutional
lender,
provided
that
the
Authority
has
received
timely
notice
of
such
Option
Event
and
has
failed
to
either
reinstate
said
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust
or
exercise
its
Option,
or
(ii)
the
recording
of
an
instrument
conveying
Owner's
interest
in
the
Property
to
the
Authority,
or
its
assignee,
provided
the
conveyance
is
in
accordance
with
the
terms
of
this
Agreement.
b.
HUD
Insured
Mortgage.
If
Owner
has
acquired
the
Property
by
a
mortgage
insured
by
the
Secretary
of
the
United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development,
and
a
notice
of
default
has
been
recorded
pursuant
to
California
Civil
Code
Section
2924
(or
successor
provisions),
then
this
Option
shall
automatically
terminate
if
title
to
the
Property
is
transferred
by
foreclosure
or
deed-in-lieu
of
foreclosure,
or
if
the
insured
mortgage
is
assigned
to
the
Secretary.
8. Voidable
Transfers.
As
long
as
the
Option
has
not
been
abandoned
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.v,
any
actual
or
attempted
sale,
conveyance,
transfer
or
other
disposition
of
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
in
violation
of
the
terms
and
conditions
of
this
Agreement,
shall
be
voidable
at
the
election
of
the
Authority.
9. Permitted
Transfers.
Provided
that
the
transferee
assumes,
within
30 days
of
a
written
request
by
the
Authority,
all
of
Owner's
duties
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
pursuant
to
a
written
assumption
agreement
in
a
form
acceptable
to
Authority,
or
at
Authority's
election,
execution
of
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement,
the
following
transfers
("Permitted
Transfers")
of
title
to
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
shall
not
be
subject
to
the
Authority's
prior
approval,
shall
not
trigger
the
exercise
of
the
Option,
and
shall
not
be
considered
Option
Events:
(a)
a
good-faith
transfer
by
gift,
devise
or
inheritance
to
'
Owner's
spouse
or
issue;
(b)
a
taking
of
title
by
a
surviving
joint
tenant;
(c)
a
court-ordered
transfer
of
title
to
a
spouse
as
part
of
a
divorce
or
dissolution
proceeding;
(d)
a
transfer
by
Owner
into
an
inter
vivos
trust
in
which
the
Owner
is
a
beneficiary
and
the
Owner
continues
to
occupy
the
property
as
his/her
primary
residence;
(e)
an
acquisition
of
title,
or
of
any
interest
therein,
in
conjunction
with
marriage;
or
(f)
any
good
faith
transfer
to
an
Eligible
Household.
Notwithstanding
any
Permitted
Transfer,
the
Option
shall
remain
effective
with
respect
to
the
Property
for
the
duration
of
the
term
hereof.
10. Permitted
Encumbrances
and
Refinancing.
This
Option
shall
not
become
exercisable
as
the
result
of
Owner's
encumbering
the
Property
for
the
purpose
of
securing
financing
to
purchase
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
to
refinance
indebtedness
incurred
to
purchase
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
or
to
make
necessary
repairs
to
the
Property
in
an
amount
approved
by
Authority
pursuant
to
Paragraph
5a
("Permitted
Encumbrances").
The
maximum
aggregate
amount
of
such
encumbrances
outstanding
at
any
time
(the
"Permitted
Encumbrance
Amount")
shall
not
exceed
an
amount
equal
to
ninety
percent
(90%)
of
the
Base
Resale
Price
calculated
as
provided
in
Paragraph
4. The
Permitted
Encumbrance
Amount
shall
be
calculated
as
if
the
Authority
had
received
notification
of
an
Option
Event
on
the
earlier
of
(a)
the
date
on
which
the
deed
of
trust
or
mortgage
securing
the
indebtedness
is
filed
for
record
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
the
County
of
Santa
Clara,
or
(b)
the
date
the
Authority
receives
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.i
above.
Owner
hereby
covenants
and
agrees
that
he/she/they
shall
use
his/her/their
best
efforts
to
ensure
that
any
deed
of
trust
or
other
agreement
encumbering
the
property
shall
include
provisions
providing
for
notice
to
be
delivered
to
Authority
of
any
default
thereunder
and
for
Authority's
right
to
cure
such
default
at
Authority's
election.
11. Obligation
of
Owner
After
Option
Abandonment.
If
the
Authority
records
a
notice
of
abandonment
of
the
Option,
then
the
Property
may
be
sold
by
Owner
to
a
third
party
without
restriction
as
to
price;
however,
upon
such
sale,
Owner
shall
pay
to
Authority
an
amount
("Authority's
Share")
equal
to
eighty-five
percent
(85%)
of
the
difference
between
(a)
the
actual
sales
price
net
of
reasonable
and
customary
real
estate
commissions
paid
(such
commissions
not
to
exceed
six
percent
(6%)
of
the
actual
sales
price),
and
(b)
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price.
The
Authority's
Share
shall
be
paid
to
the
Authority
concurrently
with
close
of
escrow
on
the
sale
of
the
Property,
or
upon
receipt
by
Owner
of
the
sale
price
for
the
Property,
whichever
shall
first
occur.
12. Limits
on
Liability.
In
no
event
shall
the
Authority
become
liable
or
obligated
in
any
manner
to
Owner
by
reason
of
the
assignment
of
this
Agreement
or
the
Option,
nor
shall
Authority
be
in
any
way
liable
or
obligated
to
Owner
for
any
failure
of
the
Authority's
assignee
to
consummate
a
purchase
of
the
Property
or
to
comply
with
the
terms
of
this
Agreement
or
the
Option,
or
any
escrow
instructions
or
agreement
for
the
purchase
of
the
Property.
13. Insurance
Proceeds
and
Condemnation
Award.
In
the
event
the
Property
is
destroyed
and
insurance
proceeds
are
distributed
to
Owner
instead
of
being
used
to
rebuild
the
Property,
or,
in
the
event
of
condemnation,
if
the
proceeds
thereof
are
distributed
to
Owner,
any
y
*
n.
surplus
of
proceeds
remaining
after
payment
of
the
senior
liens
and
encumbrances
on
the
Property
shall
be
distributed
as
follows:
that
portion
of
the
surplus
up
to,
but
not
to
exceed,
the
net
amount
Owner
would
have
received
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.ix
had
the
Authority
exercised
its
Option
on
the
date
of
the
destruction
of
condemnation
valuation
date
shall
be
distributed
to
Owner,
and
the
balance
of
such
surplus,
if
any,
shall
be
distributed
to
the
Authority.
14. Effective
Date.
The
rights
and
obligations
of
the
Authority
and
Owner
set
forth
in
this
Agreement
shall
be
effective
as
of
the
Effective
Date.
15. Term
of
Agreement
and
Option.
The
restrictions
contained
herein
and
the
Authority's
option
to
purchase
the
Property
shall
continue
for
a
period
of
forty-five
(45)
years
commencing
on
the
Effective
Date.
16. Notices.
Except
as
otherwise
specified
in
this
Agreement,
all
notices
to
be
sent
pursuant
to
this
Agreement
shall
be
made
in
writing,
and
sent
to
the
Parties
at
their
respective
addresses
specified
below
or
to
such
other
address
as
a
Party
may
designate
by
written
notice
delivered
to
the
other
Party
in
accordance
with
this
Section.
All
such
notices
shall
be
sent
by:
(a)
personal
delivery,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
upon
receipt;
(b)
certified
or
registered
mail,
return
receipt
requested,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
two
(2)
business
days
after
deposit,
postage
prepaid
in
the
United
States
mail;
(c)
nationally
recognized
overnight
courier,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
one
(1)
day
after
deposit
with
such
courier;
or
(d)
facsimile
transmission,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
on
transmittal,
provided
that
a
transmission
report
is
generated
reflecting
the
accurate
transmission
thereof.
Agency:
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
455
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
Attn:
Executive
Director
Owner:
Danny
Dias
1377
Coyote
Creek
Way
Milpitas,
CA
95035
\
17. Remedies
Upon
Breach.
a.
Specific
Performance.
Owner
acknowledges
that
any
breach
in
the
performance
of
its
obligations
under
this
Agreement
shall
cause
irreparable
harm
to
the
Authority.
Owner
agrees
that
the
Authority
is
entitled
to
equitable
relief
in
the
form
of
specific
performance
upon
its
exercise
of
the
Option,
and
that
an
award
of
damages
shall
not
be
adequate
to
compensate
the
Authority
for
Owner's
failure
to
perform
according
to
the
terms
of
this
Agreement.
b.
Other
Remedies.
Authority
shall
have
all
of
the
remedies
provided
for
at
law
or
equity.
18. General
Provisions.
a.
Attorneys'
Fees.
If
either
party
initiates
legal
proceedings
to
interpret
or
enforce
its
rights
under
this
Agreement,
the
prevailing
party
in
such
action
shall
be
entitled
to
an
award
of
reasonable
attorneys'
fees
and
costs
in
additions
to
any
other
recovery
to
which
it
is
entitled
under
this
Agreement.
b.
No
Joint
Venture;
No
Third-Party
Beneficiary.
No
joint
venture
or
other
partnership
exists
or
is
created
between
the
Parties
by
virtue
of
this
Agreement.
Except
as
expressly
stated
herein,
this
Agreement
does
not
benefit
any
third
party.
c.
Successors;
Assignment.
This
Agreement
shall
inure
to
the
benefit
of
and
shall
be
binding
upon
the
Parties
to
this
Agreement
and
their
respective
heirs,
executors,
[
administrators,
successors
and
assigns.
Authority
shall
have
the
right
to
assign
all
of
its
rights
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
without
the
consent
of
Owner.
d.
Entire
Agreement;
Amendment.
This
Agreement
constitutes
the
entire
agreement
of
the
Parties
with
respect
to
the
subject
matter
hereof,
and
supersedes
any
and
all
other
prior
negotiations,
correspondence,
understandings
and
agreements
with-Tespect
thereto.
There
are
no
representations,
promises,
agreements
or
other
understandings
between
the
Parties
relating
to
the
subject
matter
of
this
Agreement
that
are
not
expressed
herein.
This
Agreement
may
be
modified
only
by
an
instrument
in
writing
executed
by
the
Parties
or
their
respective
successors
in
interest.
e.
Survival;
No
Merger.
All
of
the
terms,
provisions,
representations,
warranties
and
covenants
of
the
Parties
under
this
Agreement
shall
survive
the
close
of
escrow
of
any
sale
of
the
Property
and
shall
not
be
merged
in
any
deed
transferring
the
Property.
f.
Authority
And
Execution.
Each
Party
represents
and
warrants
that
it
has
full
power
and
authority
to
enter
into
this
Agreement
and
to
undertake
all
of
its
obligations
hereunder,
that
each
person
executing
this
Agreement
on
its
behalf
is
duly
and
validly
authorized
to
do
so.
g.
Severability.
The
invalidity
or
unenforceability
of
any
term
or
provision
of
this
Agreement
shall
not
impair
or
affect
the
remainder
of
this
Agreement,
and
the
remaining
terms
and
provisions
hereof
shall
not
be
invalidated
but
shall
remain
in
full
force
and
effect.
h.
Waiver;
Modification.
No
waiver
or
modification
of
this
Agreement
or
any
covenant,
condition,
or
limitation
herein
contained
shall
be
valid
unless
in
writing
and
duly
executed
by
the
Party
to
be
charged
therewith.
No
evidence
or
any
waiver
or
modification
shall
be
offered
or
received
in
evidence
in
any
proceeding,
arbitration,
or
litigationbetween
the
Parties
arising
out
of
or
affecting
this
Agreement
or
the
rights
or
obligations
of
any
Party
hereunder,
unless
such
waiver
or
modification
is
in
writing
and
duly
executed
as
aforesaid.
The
provisions
of
this
section
may
not
be
waived
except
as
herein
set
forth.
A
waiver
or
breach
of
any
I
covenant,
condition
or
provision
of
this
Agreement
shall
not
be
deemed
a
waiver
of
any
other
covenant,
condition
or
provision
hereof.
i.
Construction.
The
section
headings
and
captions
used
in
this
Agreement
are
for
convenience
of
reference
only
and
shall
not
modify,
define,
limit
or
amplify
any
of
the
terms
or
provisions
hereof.
This
Agreement
shall
not
be
construed
as
if
it
had
been
prepared
by
one
of
the
Parties,
but
rather
as
if
both
Parties
have
prepared
it.
j.
Governing
Law.
This
Agreement
shall
in
all
respects
be
governed
by
and
construed
in
accordance
with
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California.
k.
Time
of
the
Essence.
Time
is
of
the
essence
in
this
Agreement
as
to
each
provision
in
which
time
is
an
element
of
performance.
1. Further
Assurances.
Each
Party
will,
upon
reasonable
request
of
the
other
Party,
execute,
acknowledge,
and
deliver,
or
cause
to
be
executed,
acknowledged,
and
delivered,
such
further
instruments
and
documents
as
may
be
reasonably
necessary
in
order
to
fulfill
the
intents
and
purposes
of
this
Agreement.
m.
Counterparts.
This
Agreement
may
be
executed
in
counterparts,
each
of
which
shall
be
deemed
an
original,
and
all
which
together
shall
constitute
one
and
die
same
instrument.
IN
WITNESS
WHEREOF,
the
undersigned
have
caused
this
Agreement
to
be
executed
as
of
the
date
first
written
above.
OWNER(S):
Danny
Dias
AUTHORITY:
CITY
ILPITA
AUTHORIT
OUSING
illiams,
Executive
Director
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State
of
California
County
of
_
Santa
Clara
J
On
/X
lo/c/
before
me,
Kathy
Ynegas,
Notary
Public
_
(insert
name
and
title
of
the
officer)
personally
appeared
ÿ
n
ÿ
_
,
_
_
,
who
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence
to
be
the
person£s}=whose
namejÿ
is/ateÿ
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me
that
he/ÿta£ft£ÿ
executed
the
same
in
his/hÿfftjjef?
authorized
capacityÿ®),
and
that
by
his/lÿi#}&rf
signaturejÿon
the
instrument
the
personfcj'or
the
entity
upon
behalf
of
which
the
persorj|«ÿcted,
executed
the
instrument.
I
certify
under
PENALTY
OF
PERJURY
under
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California
that
the
foregoing
paragraph
is
true
and
correct.
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal.
Signa
(SealT
KATHY
YNEGAS
Commission
#
2017728
i
Notary
Public
California
I
Santa
Clara
County
KATHY
YNEGAS
|
Commission
#
2017728
I
Notary
Public
-
California
I
Santa
Clara
County
-
My
Comm.
Expires
Apr
5,
2017
1
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State
of
California
County
of
_
Santa
Clara
_
)
On
Qfifiatne
/r
20/"/
before
me,
Kathy
Ynegas,
Notary
Public
_
(insert
name
and
title
of
the
officer)
personally
appeared
_
7/fo
/-//<?.
T
,
faJ
/L
C
//W-JS
_
,
who
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence
to
be
the
personj&f
whose
namÿi
\slcjfe&
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me
that
executed
the
same
in
his/tÿstftkÿir
authorized
capacity£ie££
and
that
by
his/ÿeT/tjJjeff
signatureÿon
the
instrument
the
personÿ
or
the
entity
upon
behalf
of
which
the
person(ÿScted,
executed
the
instrument.
I
certify
under
PENALTY
OF
PERJURY
under
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California
that
the
foregoing
paragraph
is
true
and
correct.
KATHY
YNEGAS
Commitaion
#
2017728
Notary
Public
California
Santa
Clara
County
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal
Signatu
CERTIFICATE
OF
ACCEPTANCE
(Pursuant
to
Government
Code
§27281)
This
is
to
certify
that
the
interest
in
real
property
conveyed
by
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement
dated
October
15,
2014
from
Danny
Dias
to
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
is
hereby
accepted
by
the
undersigned
office
or
agent
on
behalf
of
the
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
pursuant
to
authority
conferred
by
the
Resolution
No.
7714
dated
November
6,
2007
consents
to
recordation
thereof
by
its
duly
authorized
officer
Dated:
Its:
By:
EXHIBIT
A
Legal
Description
of
Site
THE
LAND
REFERRED
TO
HEREIN
BELOW
IS
SITUATED
IN
THE
CITY
OF
MILPITAS.
COUNTY
OF
SANTA
CLARA.
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA.
AND
IS
DESCRIBED
AS
FOLLOWS:
ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL
NO.
086-01-046
EXHIBIT
B
FORM:
NOTICE
OF
INTENT
TO
TRANSFER
VIA
CERTIFIED
MAIL
-
RETURN
RECEIPT
REQUESTED
To:
CITY
OF
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
455
East
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
Attn:
Authority
Executive
Director
Date:
Re:
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
Pursuant
to
the
terms
of
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement,
dated
_
,
the
undersigned
Owner(s),
_
,
hereby
give(s)
notice
of
his/her/their
intent
to
transfer
the
property
located
at
_
,
Milpitas,
California
(the
"Property").
Owner
may
be
contacted
at
the
Property
or
at
the
following
address:
Owner's
daytime
telephone
number
is
(
_
)
[If
applicable:
The
proposed
transfer
of
the
Property
is
to
the
following
person(s):
Name:
_
Address:
Telephone:
(
_
)
The
proposed
transfer
is
(check
one):
ÿ
Sale
ÿ
Other
Specify:
ÿ
Owner(s)
signature(s):
V
V
EXHIBIT
C
FORM:
NOTICE
OF
EXERCISE
Date:
To:
_
Owner
or
Transferee
Address
Re:
Notice
of
Exercise
The
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
("Authority")
hereby
gives
notice
that
it
is
exercising
its
-option
to
purchase
the
real
property
located
at
_
,
Milpitas,
California.
The
option
has
been
granted
to
the
Authority
pursuant
to
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement
between
Owner
and
the
Authority
dated
_
and
recorded
on
_
as
Instrument
No.
_
.
[The
Authority
has
assigned
its
option
to
purchase
the
real
property
to
_
.]
An
escrow
for
the
purchase
will
be
opened
with
the
Chicago
Title
Company.
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
By:
_
Its:
.
\
EXHIBIT
D
BASE
RESALE
PRICE
WORKSHEET
Date:
Owner:
Address:
Purchase
Price:
Date
of
Purchase:
Years
Owned:
years
METHOD
#1:
CALCULATION
BASED
ON
INCREASE
IN
MEDIAN
INCOME***
Present
Median-Income:
$
_
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(at
time
of
sale
of
unit)
Original
Median
Income:
$
_
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(at
time
of
purchase
of
unit)
Amount
of
Increase:
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(Present
median
income
minus
original
median
income)
Effective
Date:
Effective
Date:
Increase
in
Price:
Method
#1
Resale
Price:
METHOD
#2:
CALCULATION
BASED
ON
INCREASE
IN
MEDIAN
INCOME
Present
CPI:
Original
CPI:
Effective
Date:
Effective
Date:
Rate
of
Increase:
Increase
in
Price:
_per
annum
Method
#2
Resale
Price:
+
Based
on
the
above,
the
base
resale
price
as
of
this
date,
,
is:
By:
\
J
EXHIBIT
E
REQUEST
FOR
NOTICE
OF
DEFAULT
Order
No.
Escrow
No.
Loan
No.
WHEN
RECORDED
MAIL
TO:
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
455
East
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
Attn:
Authority
Executive
Director
(Space
Above
This
Line
For
Recorder's
Use
Only)
REQUEST
FOR
NOTICE
UNDER
SECTION
2924b
CIVIL
CODE
Iii
accordance
with
Section
2924b,
Civil
Code,
request
is
hereby
made
that
a
copy
of
any
Notice
of
Default
and
a
copy
of
any
Notice
of
Sale
under
the
Deed
of
Trust
recorded
as
Instrument
No.
_
..
on
_
,
_
,
in
the
Official
Records
of
Santa
Clara
County,
California,
and
describing
land
therein
as:
V
executed
by
_
,
as
Trustor,
in
which
_
is
named
as
Beneficiary,
and
_
,
as
Trustee,
be
mailed
to
the
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority,
455
Calaveras
Boulevard,
Milpitas,
California
_
,
Attn:
By:
_
NOTICE:
A
COPY
OF
ANY
NOTICE
OF
DEFAULT
AND
OF
ANY
NOTICE
OF
SALE
WILL
BE
SENT
ONLY
TO
THE
ADDRESS
CONTAINED
IN
THIS
RECORDED
REQUEST.
IF
YOUR
ADDRESS
CHANGES,
A
NEW
REQUEST
MUST
BE
RECORDED.
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA
)
)
COUNTY
OF
_
)
On
_
before
me,
_
,
a
Notary
Public
in
and
for
said
county
and
state,
personally
appeared
_
_
personally
known
to
me
(or
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence)
to
be
the
person(s)
whose
name(s)
is/are
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me
that
he/she/they
executed
the
same
in
his/her/their
authorized
capacity(ies),
and
that
by
his/her/their
signature(s)
on
the
instrument
the
person(s),
or
the
entity
upon
behalf
of
which
the
person(s)
acted,
executed
the
instrument.
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal.
Signature
(This
area
for
official
notarial
seal)
EXHIBIT
F
DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT
THERE
ARE
RESTRICTIONS
ON
THE
SALE
OF
THE
PROPERTY
YOU
ARE
BUYING.
EXCEPT
FOR
A
TRANSFER
TO
THE
CITY
FOLLOWING
CITY'S
EXERCISE
OF
ITS
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE,
THIS
PROPERTY
MAY
ONLY
BE
SOLD
TO
AN
"ELIGIBLE
HOUSEHOLD"
AT
A
PRICE
NOT
TO
EXCEED
THE
ADJUSTED
RESALE
PRICE
WHICH
IS
CAPPED
AT
AN
"AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
COST."
THIS
MEANS
THAT
YOU
MAY
NOT
SELL
THE
PROPERTY
FOR
MARKET
VALUE
TO
WHOMEVER
YOU
LIKE.
THESE
RESTRICTIONS
WILL
BE
IN
EFFECT
UNTIL
October
1 5,
2059
SALE
OF
THE
PROPERTY
IN
VIOLATION
OF
THE
RESTRICTIONS
SHALL
BE
VOIDABLE
AT
THE
ELECTION
OF
THE
CITY.
TO
DETERMINE
WHO
AN
ELIGIBLE
HOUSEHOLD
IS,
AND
WHAT
THE
ADJUSTED
RESALE
PRICE
AND
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
COST
ARE,
YOU
SHOULD
CONTACT
THE
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
(FORMER
CITY
OF
MILPITAS
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY).
YOU
SHOULD
ALSO
READ
THE
RESALE
RESTRICTION
AND
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE
AGREEMENT
RECORDED
AGAINST
THE
PROPERTY.
YOU
MAY
OBTAIN
A
COPY
FROM
THE
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
OR
FROM
THE
ESCROW
COMPANY.
I
HAVE
READ
THE
FOREGOING
AND
I
UNDERSTAND
WHAT
IT
MEANS.
BUYER-DannyTDias
BUYER-
!
Order
Number:
OSA-4669032
EXHIBIT
"A"
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
Real
property
in
the
City
of
Milpitas
,
County
of
Santa
Clara,
State
of
California,
described
as
follows:
PARCEL
NO.
1 Unit
226
(the
"Unit")
as
shown
and
described
in
the
Condominium
Plan
for
Coyote
Creek,
The
Rows
(together
with
any
and
all
amendments
and/or
restatements
thereto,
collectively,
the
"Plan"),
recorded
May
30,
2013
as
Instrument
No.
22239552,
First
Amendment
to
Condominium
Plan,
the
Rows,
recorded
August
29,
2013
as
Instrument
No.
22369269
and
Second
Amendment
to
Condominium
Plan
recorded
January
17,
2014
as
Instrument
No.
22499456,
in
the
Official
Records
of
Santa
Clara
County,
California
("Official
Records"),
consisting
of
a
portion
of
Lot
21 of
Tract
No.
10087,
as
shown
on
a
Subdivision
Map
("Map")
filed
in
Book
852,
Pages
38 to
44,
of
Maps,
in
the
Office
of
the
Santa
Clara
County
Recorder.
EXCEPTING
THEREFROM,
for
the
benefit
of
Grantor,
and
its
successors
in
interest
and
assignees,
to
the
extent
not
already
excepted
or
reserved
by
instrument
of
record:
A.
Any
and
all
remaining
oil
rights,
mineral
rights,
natural
gas
rights
and
rights
to
all
other
hydrocarbons
by
whatsoever
name
known,
to
all
geothermal
heat
and
to
all
products
derived
from
any
of
the
foregoing
(collectively,
"Subsurface
Resources");
B.
The
perpetual
right
to
drill,
mine,
explore
and
operate
for
and
to
produce,
store
and
remove
any
of
the
Subsurface
Resources
on
or
from
the
Unit,
including
the
right
to
whipstock
or
directionally
drill
and
mine
from
lands
other
than
the
Unit,
wells,
tunnels
and
shafts
into,
through
or
across
the
subsurface
of
the
Unit,
and
to
bottom
such
whipstocked
or
directionally
drilled
wells,
tunnels
and
shafts
within
or
beyond
the
exterior
limits
of
the
Unit,
and
to
redrill,
retunnel,
equip,
maintain,
repair,
deepen
and
operate
any
such
wells
or
mines,
but
without
the
right
to
drill,
mine,
explore,
operate,
produce,
store
or
remove
any
of
the
Subsurface
Resources
through
or
in
the
surface
or
the
upper
five
hundred
feet
(5000
of
the
subsurface
of
the
Unit;
and
C.
Any
and
all
water,
water
rights,
if
any,
including
within
and
underlying
the
Unit.
RESERVING
THEREFROM,
for
the
benefit
of
Grantor,
its
successors
in
interest
and
assignees,
nonexclusive
easements
for
access,
ingress,
egress,
encroachment,
maintenance,
drainage,
support,
and
for
other
purposes,
all
as
described
in
the
Declaration
of
Covenants,
Conditions,
Restrictions
and
Reservation
of
Easements
for
Coyote
Creek,
recorded
on
August
16,
2012
as
Instrument
No.
21796816,
First
Amendment
to
Declaration
of
Covenants,
Conditions,
Restrictions
and
Reservation
of
Easements
for
Coyote
Creek,
recorded
March
4,
2013
as
Instrument
No.
22116626
and
Supplemental
Declaration
of
Covenants,
Conditions,
Restrictions
and
Notice
of
Addition
for
Coyote
Creek,
recorded
May
30,
2013
as
Instrument
No.
22239553
(together
with
any
amendments
and
supplements
thereto,
collectively,
the
"Declaration'7),
in
Official
Records.
FURTHER
RESERVING
THEREFROM,
for
the
benefit
of
Grantor,
its
successors
in
interest
and
assignees,
the
right
to
enter
the
Unit
(i)
to
comply
with
requirements
for
the
recordation
of
subdivision
maps
or
lot
line
adjustments
in
the
Community
or
Annexable
Area,
(ii)
for
repair
of
Improvements
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
the
"Right
to
Repair
Law"
at
California
Civil
Code
Sections
895
through
945.5,
(iii)
to
accommodate
grading
or
construction
activities,
(iv)
to
comply
with
requirements
of
applicable
governmental
agencies,
and
(v)
as
may
be
reasonably
necessary
to
complete
Improvements
as
determined
by
Grantor
in
its
sole
discretion.
Grantor
shall
provide
reasonable
notice
to
Grantee
before
such
entry.
The
term
of
this
reservation
of
right
of
entry
shall
automatically
expire
on
the
date
that
is
twelve
(12)
years
from
the
last
Close
of
Escrow
for
the
sale
of
a
Unit
in
the
Community.
FURTHER
RESERVING
THEREFROM,
for
the
benefit
of
Grantor,
its
successors
and
assigns,
together
with
First
American
Title
J
Order
Number:
OSA-4669032
the
right
to
grain
and
transfer
all
or
a
portion
of
the
same,
the
right
to
place
on,
under
or
across
the
Unit,
Telecommunications
Facilities
for
the
provision
of
Telecommunications
Services
to
the
Community,
and
thereafter
to
own
and
convey
such
Telecommunications
Facilities,
and
the
right
to
enter
upon
the
Community
to
service,
maintain,
operate,
repair,
reconstruct
and
replace
the
Telecommunications
Facilities;
provided,
however,
that
the
exercise
of
such
rights
shall
not
unreasonably
interfere
with
Grantee's
reasonable
use
and
enjoyment
of
the
Unit.
PARCEL
NO.
2 An
undivided
one-twelfth
(l/12th)
fee
simple
interest
as
a
tenant
in
common
in
and
to
the
Common
Area
described
in
the
Plan.
PARCEL
NO.
3 Exclusive
use
easements
for
the
benefit
of
the
Unit
appurtenant
to
Parcel
Nos.
1 and
2 described
above,
for
decks,
entry
porches
(all
as
applicable
and
shown
in
the
Plan),
for
placement
and
maintenance
of
air
conditioning
compressor
pad
and
for
internal
and
external
telephone
wiring
purposes,
as
applicable,
over
those
portions
of
the
Association
Property
shown
in
the
Plan
or
as
described
in
the
Declaration.
PARCEL
NO.
4 Nonexclusive
easements
for
access,
drainage,
encroachment,
maintenance,
repair,
and
for
other
purposes,
all
as
may
be
shown
on
the
Plan
and
the
Map,
and
as
described
in
the
Declaration.
APN:
086-73-079
\
\
First
American
Title
r\
I
'
RECORDING
REQUESTED
BY
AND
WHEN
RECORDED
MAIL
TO:
CITY
OF
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
455
East
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
To
be
recorded
without
fee.
XGovrCodeT§§-6103-and
27383.)
-
--
(Space
Above
This
Line
For
Recorder's
Use
Only)
RESALE
RESTRICTION
AGREEMENT
AND
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE
Owner:
Danny
Dias
Property:
1377
Coyote
Creek
Way
Milpitas,
California
95035
Name
of
Development:
Coyote
Creek
,
This
RESALE
RESTRICTION
AND
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE
AGREEMENT
("Agreement")
is
entered
into
by
and
between
the
Housing
Authority
of
the
City
of
Milpitas
("the
Authority"-
former
Milpitas
Redevelopment
Agency)
Danny
Dias
("Owner")
regarding
certain
improved
real
propertyÿ
which
is
more
particularly
described
in
Exhibit
A
attached
hereto
and
incorporated
herein
and
commonly
known
as
William
Lyons
Homes,
Milpitas,
CA
95035
(the
"Property")
effective
as
of
October
15,
2014
(Effective
Date").
Authority
and
Owner
are
hereinafter
collectively
referred
'to
as
the
"Parties."
RECITALS
A.
The
Authority
pursuant
to
the
previous
Community
Redevelopment
Law
(Health
&
Safety
Code
section
33000
et
seq.)
and
the
previous
Authority's
Redevelopment
Plan
maintains
an
affordable
housing
fund,
which
it
uses
for
the
purpose
encouraging
the
construction
of
housing
within
the
Redevelopment
Plan
Area
that
is
affordable
to
persons
of
low,
and
moderate
income
("the
Program").
B.
Pursuant
to
the
Program,
the
Authority
and
Fairview
Murphy
Road
LLC
(Developer)
entered
into
a
Affordable
Housing
Regulatory
Agreement,
dated
August
29,
2008
(collectively
"the
Agreement")
under
which
Developer
has
agreed
to
construct
and
sell
44 homes
at
prices
that
are
affordable
to
persons
of
low
and
moderate
incomes.
C.
Owner
is
the
owner
of
certain
real
property
located
within
the
City
of
Milpitas,
legally
described
in
Exhibit
A
and
commonly
known
as
Coyote
Creek
Milpitas,
CA
95035
("the
Property").
The
Property
is
one
of
the
affordable
homes
constructed
by
Developer
pursuant
to
the
Agreement.
D.
Owner
is
an
eligible
low
and
moderate-income
purchaser
under
the
Program,
intends
to
live
in
the
Property
as
an
owner
occupant,
and
agrees
to
maintain
the
Property
as
Owner's
principal
residence.
E.
In
order
to
maintain
and
preserve
the
Property
as
housing
affordable
to
eligible
[very
low-,
low-,
or
moderate-]income
purchasers,
it
is
necessary
to
restrict
the
use
and
resale
of
the
Property
through
imposition
of
the
occupancy
and
resale
restrictions
set
forth
in
this
Agreement.
These
restrictions
are
intended
to
prevent
initial
and
subsequent
purchasers
from
using
the
Property
for
purposes
incompatible
with
the
Program
and
realizing
unwarranted
gains
from
sales
of
the
Property
at
unrestricted
prices.
The
terms
and
conditions
of
this
Agreement
are
intended
to
provide
the
necessary
occupancy
and
resale
restrictions
to
ensure
that
the
Property
is
used,
maintained,
and
preserved
as
housing
affordable
to
eligible
[very
low-,
low-,
or
moderate-
]income
purchasers.
To
further
serve
the
purposes
of
the
Program,
it
is
necessary
that
the
Authority
be
granted
an
option
to
purchase
the
property
so
that
the
property
may
be
resold
by
the
Authority
to
an
eligible
household.
F.
Accordingly,
the
Parties
desire
to
enter
into
this
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement,
which
provides,
generally,
that
Owner
may
only
sell
the
property
to
Eligible
Households
(i.e.
households
meeting
the
household
income
limitations
set
forth
herein)
at
a
price
not
to
exceed
the
price
equal
to
the
initial
purchase
price
adjusted
to
reflect
increases
in
median
household
income
since
the
Property
was
initially
purchased
by
Owner.
Alternatively,
the
Agreement
provides
that
the
City
may
exercise
its
option
to
purchase
the
Property
at
the
same
price.
G.
The
Property
constitutes
a
valuable
community
resource
by
providing
decent,
safe,
and
sanitary
housing
to
persons
and
families
of
[very
low,
low,
or
moderate]
income
who
otherwise
would
be
unable
to
afford
such
housing.
To
protect
and
preserve
this
resource
it
is
necessary,
proper,
and
in
the
public
interest
for
the
Authority
to
administer
occupancy
and
resale
controls
consistent
with
the
Program
by
means
of
this
Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW,
THEREFORE,
in
consideration
of
the
substantial
economic
benefits
inuring
to
Owner
and
the
public
purposes
to
be
achieved
under
the
Program,
Owner
and
Authority
hereby
agree
as
follows:
1. Definitions.
a.
"Affordable
Unit
Cost"
shall
mean
a
sales
price
that
results
in
annual
housing
costs,
including
principal
payments,
interest,
property
taxes,
homeowners'
insurance,
homeowners'
association
dues,
and
mortgage
insurance
that
do
not
exceed
30%
of
income
level
for
the
Eligible
Household.
/
t
b.
"Area
Moderate
Income
for
Santa
Clara
County"
means
those
income
and
eligibility
levels
determined,
updated,
and
published
each
year
by
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development,
based
on
Santa
Clara
County
median
income
levels,
adjusted
for
household
size.
c.
"Persons
and
families
of
[very
low,
low,
or
moderate]
income"
means
persons
and
families
whose
income
do
not
exceed
[fifty
percent
(50%);
eighty
percent
(80%);
or
one
hundred
twenty
percent
(120%)]
of
the
Area
Median
Income
for
Santa
Clara
County,
as
adjusted
.forliQuschoId
size.
.
d.
Persons
and
families
meeting
the
definition
set
forth
in
Paragraph
1 (b)
above
shall
be
referred
to
as
"Eligible
Households."
2. Program
Requirements.
a.
Affordability
Restrictions.
Owner
hereby
covenants
and
agrees
that
during
the
term
of
this
Agreement
all
of
the
requirements
and
restrictions
of
this
Agreement
shall
apply,
and
the
Property
shall
be
sold
or
otherwise
transferred
only
pursuant
to
the
terms
and
conditions
of
this
Agreement
and
only
to
(i)
Eligible
Households
at
a
price
not
to
exceed
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price,
as
defined
in
Paragraph
5,
(ii)
the
Authority
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3,
or
(iii)
a
permitted
transferee
pursuant
to
Paragraph
9. b.
Disclosure.
DURING
THE
TERM
OF
THIS
AGREEMENT
THERE
SHALL
BE
NO
SALE
OR
OTHER
TRANSFER
OF
THE
PROPERTY
WITHOUT
THE
WRITTEN
CERTIFICATION
BY
THE
AUTHORITY
THAT
THE
TRANSFEREE
QUALIFIES
AS
AN
ELIGIBLE
HOUSEHOLD
AND
THAT
THE
PROPERTY
IS
BEING
TRANSFERRED
AT
A
PRICE
NOT
TO
EXCEED
THE
ADJUSTED
RESALE
PRICE,
WHICH
IS
CAPPED
AT
THE
AFFORDABLE
UNIT
COST
AS
DEFINED
IN
PARAGRAPH
ÿ
l.a.
ANY
SALE
OR
OTHER
TRANSFER
OF
THE
PROPERTY
IN
VIOLATION
OF
THIS
COVENANT
SHALL
BE,
VOID.
c.
Principal
Residence
Requirement.
OWNER
COVENANTS
AND
AGREES
THAT
HE/SHE/THEY
SHALL
OCCUPY
THE
PROPERTY
AS
HIS/HER/THEIR
PRINCIPAL
RESIDENCE
FOR
THE
DURATION
OF
HIS/HER/THEIR
OWNERSHIP
AND
SHALL
NOT
RENT
OR
LEASE
THE
PROPERTY
OR
PORTION
THEREOF
DURING
THE
TERM
OF
THIS
AGREEMENT.
Without
limiting
the
generality
of
the
foregoing,
any
absence
from
the
Property
by
Owner
for
a
period
of
ninety
(90)
or
more
days
shall
be
deemed
an
abandonment
of
the
Property
as
the
principal
residence
of
Owner
in
violation
of
the
conditions
of
this
Paragraph.
Upon
request
by
the
Authority
made
from
time
to
time,
the
Owner
of
the
Property
shall
submit
an
affidavit
to
the
Authority
certifying
that
the
Property
is
the
Owner's
principal
residence
and
provide
such
documents
and
other
evidence
as
may
be
requested
to
verify
Owner's
compliance
with
this
requirement.
Abandonment
of
the.
Property
shall
constitute
an
Option
Event
(as
defined
in
Paragraph
3.c
below)
and
shall
entitle
the
Authority
to
exercise
its
Option
to
purchase
the
Property.
3. Option
to
Purchase.
o
a;
Grant
of
Option
to
Purchase.
Owner
hereby
grants
to
the
Authority
an
option
("Option")
to
purchase
all
of
Owner's
-right,
title
and
interest
in
and
to
the
Property
upon
*
the
occurrence
of
an
Option
Event
(defined
in
Paragraph
3.c
below),
subject
to
the
terms
and
.
conditions
contained
herein.
b.
Assignment
of
the
Option.
The
Authority
may
assign
the
Option
to
another
government
entity,
a
non-profitaffordable
housing
provider
or
a
person
or
family
that
qualifies
as
an
Eligible
Household.
The
Authority's
assignment
of
the
Option
shall
not
extend
any
time
_
limits_c.Qntained-herein_with_respect_to..theexercise_perio,d-oTthe-QptiorLor-the-periQd-within..- which
the
Property
must
be
purchased.
.
c.
Events
Giving
Rise
to
Right
to
Exercise
Option.
The
Authority
shall
have
the
right
to
exercise
its
Option
upon
the
occurrence
of
any'
of
the
following
events
(each,
an
"Option
Event"):
i.
Receipt
of
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
(defined
in
Paragraph
3.d.i
below);
ÿ
ii.
Any
actual,
attempted
or
pending
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease
or
other
attempted
disposition
of
the
Property
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
except
as
provided
in
Paragraph
10 below;*
iii.
Any
actual,
attempted
or
pending
encumbrance
of
the
Property,
including
without
limitation
by
way
of
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust,
or
by
judgment;
mechanics,
tax
or
other
lien,
except
as
provided
in
Paragraph
9 below;
N
.
iv.
Recordation
of
a
notice
of
default
and/or
notice
of
sale
pursuant
to
California
Civil
Code
section
2924
(or
successor
provisions)
under
any
deed
of
trust
or
mortgage
with
a
power
of
sale
encumbering
the
Property;
v."
Commencement
of
a
judicial
foreclosure
proceeding
regarding
the
Property;
vi.
Execution
by
Owner
of
any
deed
in
lieu
of
foreclosure
transferring
ownership
of
the
Property;
vii.
Commencement
of
a
proceeding
or
action
in
bankruptcy,
whether
voluntary
or
involuntary,
pursuant
to
Title
1 1
of
the
United
States
Code
or
other
bankruptcy
statute,
or
any
other
insolvency,
reorganization,
arrangement;
assignment
for
the
benefit
of
creditors,
receivership
or
trusteeship,
concerning
the
Owner;-
or
viii.
Any
violation
by
Owner
of
any
provision
of
this
Agreement
including,
without
limitation,
the
conditions
set
forth
in
Paragraph
2-above.
d.
.
Method
of
Exercising
the
Option.
i.
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer.
If
Owner
desires
to
sell,
convey,
transfer
(other
than
pursuant,
to
Paragraph
9),
lease,
encumber
(other
than
pursuant
to
Paragraph
1 0)
or
otherwise
dispose
of
the
Property
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
no
less
than
60 days
prior
to
the
date
of
such
proposed
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease,
encumbrance
or
disposition,
Owner
shall
notify
Authority
in
writing
to
that
effect
(the
"Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer").
The
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
shall
be
in
substantially
the
form
attached
hereto
as
Exhibit
B.
In
the
case
of
a
proposed
sale
of
the
Property
to
an
identified
prospective
purchaser,
the
Owner
shall
submit'
to
the
Authority,
together
with
the
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer,
a
copy
of
the
prospective
purchaser's
income
certification,
a
list
of
all
assets
owned
by
the
prospective
purchaser,
and
other
financial
information
reasonably
requested
by
Authority,
in
a
form
approved
by
the
-Authority,
-nlong-with-theincome-certification-to-be-provided-to-any-lender-making-a-loan-to-the —
prospective
purchaser.
The
Authority
may
require
documentation
evidencing
and
supporting
the
income
and
other
financial
information
contained
in
the
certifications.
ii.
Notice
of
Exercise.
Upon
the
occurrence
of
any
Option
Event/the
Authority
may
exercise
its
Option
by
delivering
notice,
pursuant
to
Paragraph
16 and
within
the
time
period
specified
in
Paragraph
3(d)(iv),
to
Owner
of
Authority's
intent
to
exercise
such
Option
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
this
Agreement
("Notice
of
Exercise").
The
Notice
of
Exercise
may
be
in
the
form
attached
hereto
and
incorporated
herein
as
Exhibit
C.
or
in
such
other
form
as
the
Authority
may
from
time
to
time
adopt.
If
the
Option
Event
relates
to
the
potential
foreclosure
of
a
mortgage
under
Paragraphs
3 .c.iv,
3 .c.v,
or
3 .c.vi,
then
the
Authority
shall
also
deliver
the
Notice
of
Exercise
to
the
mortgagee
or
beneficiary
under
such
mortgage,
at
such
mortgagee's
or
beneficiary's
address
of
record
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
Santa
Clara
County.
iii.
Notice
of
Consent
to
Transfer.
If
the
Authority
does
not
exercise
the
Option,
it
may
give
its
consent
to
the
occurrence
of
the
Option
Event
("Consent
to
Transfer").
If
the
Option
Event
involves
a
proposed
sale
of
the
Property
to
a
prospective
purchaser,
the
Authority's
consentshall
be
conditioned
upon
(i)
the
proposed
purchaser's
qualification
as
an
Eligible
Household;
(ii)
the
sale
of
the
Property
at
a
price
not
to
exceed
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price;
(iii)
the
proposed
purchaser's
execution
of
a
Disclosure
Statement
in
the
form
attached
hereto
as
Exhibit
F
or
such
other
form
or
forms
as
may
be
promulgated
by
the
Authority
;
and
(iv)
the
proposed
purchaser's
assumption
of
Owner's
duties
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
pursuant
to
a
written
assumption
agreement
in
a
form
acceptable
to
Authority,
or
execution
of
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement,
within
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
Consent
to
Transfer
has
been
delivered
to
Owner
and
recordation
of
such
assumption
agreement
or
substitute
agreement.
If
the
prospective
purchaser
(i)
fails
to
qualify
as
an
Eligible
Household,
(ii)
fails
to
execute
and
deliver
the
Disclosure
Statement
to
the
Authority,
or
(iii)
fails
to
execute
and
deliver
to
the
Authority
an
assumption
agreement
or
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement
within
such
sixty
(60)
day
period,
then
the
Consent
to
Transfer
shall
expire
and
the
Authority
may,
at
its
option,
either
notify
Owner
of
the
disqualification,
thereby
entitling
Owner
to
locate
another
purchaser
who
qualifies
as
Eligible
Household,
or
exercise
the
Option,
as
if
no
Consent
to
Transfer
had
been
delivered.
iv.
'
Time
Period
for
Notice.
The
Authority
shall
deliver
a
Consent
to
Transfer,
if
applicable,
not
later
than
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
date
that
it
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event.
The
Authority
shall
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise,
if
applicable,
on
or
before
the
date
which
is
the
later
to
occur
of
the
following:
(i)
sixty
(60)
days
after
the
date
that
the
Authority
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event
or
(ii)
thirty
(30)
days
after
a
Consent
to
Transfer
has
expired.
For
purposes
of
computing
commencement
of
the
delivery
periods,
the
Authority
shall
be
deemed
to
have
received
notification
of
an
Option
Event
on
the
date
of
delivery
of
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer,
pursuant
to
the
terms
of
Paragraph
1 6
below
or
on
the
date
it
actually
receives
notice
of
default,
summons
and
complaint
or
other
pleading,
or
other
writing
specifically
stating
that
an
Option
Event
has
occurred.
The
Authority
shall
have
no
obligation
to
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer,
and
the
applicable
time
period
for
exercise
of
the
Option
shall
not
commence
to
run,
unless
and
until
the
Agency
has
received
notification
of
an
Option
Event
in
the
manner
specified
in
this
subparagraph.
If
there
is
a
stay
or
-injunction-imposed-byxourt.order-precludmg-the-Authority-fiom-delivering-its-Consent-to -
Transfer
or
Notice
of
Exercise
within
the
applicable
time
period,
then
the
running
of
such
period
shall
cease
until
such
time
as
the
stay
is
lifted
or
the
injunction
is
dissolved
and
the
Authority
has
been
given
written
notice
thereof,
at
which
time
the
period
for
delivery
of
a
Consent
to
Transfer
or
Notice
of
Exercise
shall
again
begin
to
run.
v.
Notice
of
Abandonment.
If
the
Authority
fails
to
deliver
a
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer
within
the
time
periods
set
forth
in
paragraph
3.d.iv,
upon
request
by
Owner,
the
Authority
shall
cause
to
be
filed
for
recordation
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
Santa
Clara
County,
a
notice
of
abandonment,
which
shall
declare
that
the
provisions
of
the
Option
are
no
longer
applicable
to
the
Property.
Unless
Owner
requests
recordation
of
notice
of
abandonment
within
3 0
days
of
the
Authority'
s
failure
to
deliver
Notice
of
Exercise
or
Consent
to
Transfer,
the
Authority
shall
have
no
obligation
to
record
the
notice
of
abandonment.
Upon
recordation
of
a
notice
of
abandonment,
the
Option
shall
terminate
and
have
no
further
force
and
effect.
If
the
Authority
fails
to
record
a
notice
of
abandonment,
the
sole
remedy
of
Owner
shall
be
to
obtain
a
judicial
order
instructing
prompt
recordation
of
such
a
notice.
vi.
Right
to
Reinstatement.
If
the
Option
Event
is
the
recordation
of
a
notice
of
default,
then
the
Agency
shall
be
deemed
to
be
Owner's
successor
in
interest
under
California
Civil
Code
Section
2924c
(or
successor
section)
solely
for
purposes
of
reinstatement
of
any
mortgage
on
the
Property
that
has
led
to
the
recordation
of
the
notice
of
default.
As
Owner's
deemed
successor
in
interest,
the
Authority
shall'be
entitled
to
pay
all
amounts
of
principal,
interest,
taxes,
assessments,
homeowners'
association
fees,
insurance
premiums,
advances,
costs,
attorneys'
fees
and
expenses
required
to
cure
the
default.
If
the
Agency
exercises
the
Option,
then
any
and
all
amounts
paid
by
the
Authority
pursuant
to
this
Paragraph
shall
be
treated
as
Adjustments
to
the
Base
Resale
Price
for
the
Property,
as
defined
in
Paragraph
5 below.
vii.
Inspection
of
Property.
After
receiving
a
Notice
of
Intent
to
transfer
or
delivering
a
Notice
of
Exercise;
the
Authority
shall
be
entitled
to
inspect
the
Property
one
or
more
times
prior
to
the
close
of
escrow
to
determine
the
amount
of
any
Adjustments
to
the
Base
Resale
Price.
Before
inspecting
the
Property,
the
Authority
shall
give
Owner
not
less
than
.
forty-eight
(48)
hours'
written
notice
of
the
date,
time
and
expected
duration
of
the
inspection.
The
inspection
shall
be
conducted
between
the
hours
of
9:00
a.m.
and
5:00
p.m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
court
holidays,
unless
the
parties
mutually,
agree
in
writing
to
another
date
and
time.
Owner
shall
make
the
Property
available
for
inspection
on
the
date
and
at
the
time
specified
in
the
Authority's
request
for
inspection.
viii.
Escrow.
Promptly
after
delivering
a
Notice
of
Exercise,
the
Authority
shall
open
an
escrow
account
for
its
purchase
of
the
Property.
Close
of
escrow
shall
take
place
on
the
date
that
is
the
later
to
occur
of
the
following,
(a)
ninety
(90)
days
after
a
Notice
of
Exercise
has
been
delivered,
or
(b)
ten
(10)
days
after
Owner
has
performed
all
acts
and
executed
all
documents
required
for
close
of
escrow.
Prior
to
the
close
of
escrow,
the
Authority
shall
deposit
into
escrow
with
a
title
company
of
Authority's
choosing,
an
amount
equal
to
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price
as
defined
in
Paragraph
5 below
and
all
escrow
fees
and
closing
costs
to.be
paid
by
Authority.
Commissions
(not
to
exceed
6%
of
the
actual
sales
price),
-closing-costs-and-title-insurance-shall-be-paid-pursuant-to-the-custom-and-practiGe-in-the-Gounty— of
Santa
Clara
at
the
time
of
the
opening
of
escrow,
or
as
may
otherwise
be
provided
by
mutual
agreement.
Owner
agrees
to
perform
all
acts
and
execute
all
documents
reasonably
necessary
to
effectuate
the
close
of
escrow
and
transfer
of
the
Property
to
the
Authority.
ix.
Proceeds
of
Escrow;
Removal
of
Exceptions
to
Title.
Prior
to
close
of
escrow,
Owner
shall
cause
the
removal
of
all
exceptions
to
title
to
the
Property
that
were
recorded
after
the
Effective
Date
with
the
exception
of
(i)
taxes
for
the
fiscal
year
in
which
the
escrow
for
this
transaction
closes,
which
taxes
shall
be
prorated
as
between
Owner
and
Authority
as
of
the
date
of
close
of
escrow;
(ii)
quasi-public
utility,
public
alley,
public
street
easements,
and
rights
of
way
of
record,
and
(iii)
such
other
liens,
encumbrances,
reservations
and
restrictions
as
may
be
approved
in
writing
by
Authority
("Permitted
Exceptions").
The
purchase
price
deposited
into
escrow
by
the
Authority
shall
be
applied
first
to
the
payment
of
any
and
all
Permitted
Encumbrances
(as
defined
in
Paragraph
10)
recorded
against
the
Property
in
order
of
lien
priority,
and
thereafter
to
the
payment
of
Owner's
share
of
escrow
fees
and
closing
costs.
Any
amounts
remaining
after
the
purchase
price
has
been
so
applied,
if
any,
shall
be
paid
to
Owner
upon
the
close
of
escrow.
If
the
purchase
price
is
insufficient
to
satisfy
all
liens
and
encumbrances
recorded
against
the
Property,
the
Owner
shall
deposit
into
escrow
such
additional
sums
as
may
be
required
to
remove
said
liens
and
encumbrances.
In
the
event
that
the
Authority
agrees
to
proceed
with
close
of
escrow
prior
to
the
date
that
Owner
has
caused
all
exceptions
to
title
recorded
after
the
Effective
Date
other
than
Permitted
Exceptions
to
be
removed,
then
Owner
shall
indemnify,
defend
and
hold
Authority
harmless
from
any
and
all
.
costs
expenses
or
liabilities
(including
attorneys'
fees)
incurred
or
suffered
by
Authority
that
relate
to
such
exceptions
and
their
removal
as
exceptions
to
title
to
the
Property.
'
4. Base
Resale
Price.
Prior
to
adjustment
pursuant
to
Paragraph
5 the
base
resale
price
("Base
Resale
Price")
of
the
Property
shall
be
the
lowest
of:
$301,000.00
a.
Median
Income.
The
original
price
("Base
Price")
paid
by
Owner
for
acquisition
of
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
increased
(but
not
decreased)
by
an
amount,
if
any,
equal
to
the
Base
Price
multiplied
by
the
percentage
increase
in
the
median
household
income
("Median
Income")
for
Santa
Clara
County
published
by
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development,
Division
of
Housing
Policy
Development,
between
the
Effective
Date
and
the
date
that
the
Authority
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event;
or
b.
Index
Price.
The
Base
Price
increased
(but
not
decreased)
by
an
amount,
if
any,
equal
to
the
Base
Price
multiplied
by
the
percentage
increase
in
the
Consumer
Price
Index
for
All
Urban
Consumers
for
the
San
Francisco-Oakland-San
Jose
published
by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
("Index")
between
the
Recording
Date
and
the
date
that
the
City
receives
notification
of
an
Option
Event;
or
c.
Fair
Market
Value.
The
fair
market
value
of
the
Property
as
determined
by
an
appraiser
selected
and
paid
for
by
Owner
and
approved
in
writing
by
the
Authority
d.
Compute
the
Base
Resale
Price,
the
Authority
may
use
the
Base
Resale
Price
Worksheet
attached
as
Exhibit
D
hereto,
or
such
other
form
as
the
Authority
may
from
time
to
time
adopt.
5. Adjustments
to
Base
Resale
Price.
Subject
to
the
Affordable
Unit
Cost
restriction
described
in
subparagraph
(d)
below,
the
Base
Resale
Price
shall
be
increased
or
decreased,
as
applicable,
by
the
following
adjustment
factors
("Adjustment"):
t
a.
Capital
Improvements.
An
increase
for
capital
improvements
made
to
the
Property,
but
only
if
the
amount
of
such
improvements
has
been
previously
approved
in
writing
by
the
Authority
after
Owner
has
submitted
original,
written
documentation
of
the
cost
to
the
Authority
for
verification.
The
amount
of
the
Adjustment
shall
equal
the
original
cost
of
any
such
capital
improvements.
b.
Damages.
A
decrease
by
the
amount
necessary
to
repair
damage
to
the
Property,
if
any,
and
to
place
the
Property
into
saleable
condition
as
reasonably
determined
by
the
Authority
upon
Authority's
exercise
of
its
Option
hereunder,
including,
without
limitation,
amounts
attributed
to
cleaning;
painting;
replacing
worn
carpeting
and
draperies;
making
necessary
structural,
mechanical,
electrical
and
plumbing
repairs;
and
repairing
or
replacing
built-in
appliances
and
fixtures.
Owner
hereby
covenants
to,
at
Owner's
expense,
maintain
the
Property
in
the
same
condition
as
in
existence
on
the
date
of
Authority's
Notice
of
Exercise,
reasonable
wear
and
tear
excepted.
c.
Advances
by
the
Authority.
A
decrease
in
an
amount
equal
to
the
sum
of
all
costs
advanced
by
the
Authority
for
the
payment
of
mortgages,
taxes,
assessments,
insurance
premiums,
homeowner's
association
fees
and/or
associated
late
fees,
costs,
penalties,
interest,
attorneys'
fees,
pest
inspections,
resale
inspections
and
other
expenses
related
to
the
Property,
which
Owner
has
failed
to
pay
or
has
permitted
to
become
delinquent.
d.
Adjusted
Resale
Price
Not
to
Exceed
Affordable
Unit
Cost.
The
Base
Resale
Price
as
adjusted,
is
hereinafter
referred
to
as
the
"Adjusted
Resale
Price."
Notwithstanding
any
other
provision
hereof
to
the
contrary,
in
no
event
shall
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price
exceed
the
Affordable
Unit
Cost.
6. Priority
and
Effectiveness
of
the
Option.
a.
Recordation.
This
Agreement
shall
be
recorded
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
'
of
the
County
of
Santa
Clara
on
or
as
soon
as
practicable
after
the
Effective
Date.
The
Option
shall
have
priority
over
any
subsequent
sale,
conveyance,
transfer,
lease
or
other
disposition
or
encumbrance
of
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
and
in
the
event
of
exercise
of
A
'N
"s>
the
Option
by
Authority,
the
Authority
shall
take
the
Property
subject
only
to
Permitted
Exceptions.
Except
as
otherwise
provided
in
Paragraph
7.a,
the
exercise
of
the
Option
by
the
Authority
at
any
time
and
from
time
to
.
time
shall
not
extinguish
the
Option
or
cause
a
merger
of
the
Option
into
any
estate
or
other
interest
in
the
Property,
and
the
Option
shall
continue
to
exist
and
be
effective
with
respect
to
the
Property
against
any
and
all
subsequent
owners
in
accordance
with
the
terms
and
conditions
hereof.
b.
Request
for
Notice
of
Default.
The
Authority
shall
file
a
Request
for
Notice
_QfD_efaultfQnrecQrdation_in_theX)fFiceLof-the-Recorder-ojEltheX!;o-unty-of-Santa-ClaEa-promptl-y -
upon
execution
of
this
Agreement
(see
Exhibit
E).
7. Survival
of
Option
Upon
Transfer.
a.
In
General.
The
Authority's
right
to
exercise
the
Option
shall
survive
any
transfer
of
the
Property
by
Owner.
Each
transferee,
assignee
or
purchaser
of
the
Property
during
the
term
hereof
shall
be
required
to
execute
an
agreement
substantially
in
the
form
of
this
Agreement,
provided
that
the
term
of
any
such
agreement
shall
be
for
the
duration
of
the
term
hereof
as
of
the
date
of
any
such
transfer,
assignment
or
sale.
The
Option
may
be
exercised
against
the
Property
throughout
the
term
hereof,
regardless
of
whether
the
Property
is
owned,
possessed
or
occupied
by
Owner
or
any
successor,
transferee,
assignee,
heir,
executor,
or
administrator
of
Owner,
regardless
of
household
income
(if
applicable)
including
a
debtor-in-
possession,
debtor
or
trustee
pursuant
to
Title
1 1
of
the
United
States
Code.
Notwithstanding
the,
foregoing,
the
Option
shall
not
survive
(i)
the
sale
and
transfenof
the
Property
to
a
third
party
purchaser
pursuant
to
a
judicial
or
non-judicial
foreclosure
or
a
deed-in-lieu
of
foreclosure
under
a
power
of
sale
contained
in
a
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust
held
by
an
institutional-lender,
provided
that
the
Authority
has
received
timely
notice
of
such
Option
Event
and
has
failed
to
either
reinstate
said
mortgage
or
deed
of
trust
or
exercise
its
Option,
or
(ii)
the
recording
of
an
instrument
conveying
Owner's
interest
in
the
Property
to
the
Authority,
or
its
assignee,
provided
-
the
conveyance
is
in
accordance
with
the
terms
of
this
Agreement.
b.
HUD
Insured
Mortgage.
If
Owner
has
acquired
the
Property
by
a
mortgage
insured
by
the
Secretary
of
the
United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development,
and
a
notice
of
default
has
been
recorded
pursuant
to
California
Civil
Code
Section
2924
(or
successor
provisions),
then
this
Option
shall
automatically
terminate
if
title
to
the
Property
is
transferred
by
foreclosure
or
deed-in-lieu
of
foreclosure,
or
if
the
insured
mortgage
is
assigned
to
the
Secretary.
'
8. Voidable
Transfers.
As
long
as
the
Option
has
not
been
abandoned
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.v,
any
actual
or
attempted
sale,
conveyance,
transfer
orother
disposition
of
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
-therein,
in
violation
of
the
terms
and
conditions
of
this
Agreement,
shall
be
voidable
at
the
election
of
the
Authority.
9. Permitted
Transfers.
Provided
that
the
transferee
assumes,
within
30 days
of
a
written
request
by
the
Authority,
all
of
Owner's
duties
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
pursuant
to
a
written
assumption
agreement
in
a
form
acceptable
to
Authority,
or
at
Authority's
election,
execution
of
an
agreement
substantially
similar
to
this
Agreement,
the
following
transfers
("Permitted
Transfers")
of
title
to
the
Property,
or
of
any
estate
or
interest
therein,
shall
not
be
subject
to
the
Authority's
prior
approval,
shall
not
trigger
the
exercise
of
the
Option,
and
shall
not
be
considered
Option
Events:
(a)
a
good-faith
transfer
by
gift,
devise
or
inheritance
to
Owner's
spouse
or
issue;
(b)
a
taking
of
title
by
a
surviving
joint
tenant;
(c)
a
court-ordered
transfer
of
title
to
a
spouse
as
part
of
a
divorce
or
dissolution
proceeding;
(d)
a
transfer
by
Owner
into
an
inter
vivos
trust
in
which
the
Owner
is
a
beneficiary
and
the
Owner
continues
to
occupy
the
property
as
his/her
primary
residence;
(e)
an
acquisition
of
title,
or
of
any
interest
therein,
in
conjunction
with
marriage;
or
(f)
any
good
faith
transfer
to
an
Eligible
Household.
Notwithstanding
any
Permitted
Transfer,
the
Option
shall
remain
effective
with
respect
to
the
-Property-fonthe-duration-of-the-term-hereof.
10. Permitted
Encumbrances
and
Refinancing.
This
Option
shall
not
become
exercisable
as
the
result
of
Owner's
encumbering
the
Property
for
the
purpose
of
securing
financing
to
purchase
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
to
refinance
indebtedness
incurred
to
purchase
the
Property
pursuant
to
the
Program,
or
to
make
necessary
repairs
to
the
Property
in
an
amount
approved
by
Authority
pursuant
to
Paragraph
5a
("Permitted
Encumbrances").
The
maximum
aggregate
amount
of
such
encumbrances
outstanding
at
any
time
(the
"Permitted
Encumbrance
Amount")
shall
not
exceed
an
amount
equal
to
ninety
percent
(90%)
of
the
Base
Resale
Price
calculated
as
provided
in
Paragraph
4. The
Permitted
Encumbrance
Amount
shall
be
calculated
as
if
the
Authority
had
received
notification
of
an
Option'Event
on
the
earlier
of
(a)
the
date
on
which
the
deed
of
trust
or
mortgage
securing
the
indebtedness
is
filed
for
record
in
the
Office
of
the
Recorder
of
the
County
of
Santa
Clara,
or
(b)
the
date
the
Authority
receives
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.i
above.
Owner
hereby
covenants
and
agrees
that
he/she/they
shall
use
his/her/their
best
efforts
to
ensure
that
any
deed
of
trust
or
other
agreement
encumbering
the
property
shall
include
provisions
providing
for
notice
to
be
delivered
to
Authority
of
any
default
thereunder
and
for
Authority's
right
to
cure
such
default
at
Authority's
election.
1 1
.
Obligation
of
Owner
After
Option
Abandonment.
If
the
Authority
records
a
notice
of
abandonment
of
the
Option,
then
the
Property
may
be
sold
by
Owner
to
a
third
party
without
restriction
as
to
price;
however,
upon
such
sale,
Owner
shall
pay
to
Authority
an
amount
("Authority's
Share")
equal
to
eighty-five
percent
(85%)
of
the
difference
between
(a)
the
actual
sales
price
net
of
reasonable
and
customary
real
estate
commissions
paid
(such
commissions
riot
.
to
exceed
six
percent
(6%)
of
the
actual
sales
price),
and
(b)
the
Adjusted
Resale
Price.
The
Authority's
Share
shall
be
paid
to
the
Authority
concurrently
with
close
of
escrow
on
the
sale
of
the
Property,
or
upon
receipt
by
Owner
of
the
sale
price
for
the
Property,
whichever
shall
first
pccur.
12. Limits
on
Liability.
In
no
event
shall
the
Authority
become
liable
or
obligated
in
any
manner
to
Owner
by
reason
of
the
assignment
of
this
Agreement
or
the
Option,
nor
shall
Authority
be
in
any
way
liable
or
obligated
to
Owner
for
any
failure
of
the
Authority's
assignee
to
consummate
a
purchase
of
the
Property
or
to
comply
with
the
terms
of
this
Agreement
or
the
Option,
or
any
escrow
instructions
or
agreement
for
the
purchase
of
the
Property.
13. Insurance
Proceeds
and
Condemnation
Award.
In
the
event
the
Property
is
destroyed
and
insurance
proceeds
are
distributed
to
Owner
instead
of
being
used
to
rebuild
the
Property,
or,
in
the
event
of
condemnation,
if
the
proceeds
thereof
are
distributed
to
Owner,
any
vj
surplus
of
proceeds
remaining
after
payment
of
the
senior
liens
.and
encumbrances
on
the
Property
shall
be
distributed
as
follows:
that
portion
of
the
surplus
up
to,
but
not
to
exceed,
the
net
amount
Owner
would
have
received
pursuant
to
Paragraph
3.d.ix
had
the
Authority
exercised
its
Option
on
the
date
of
the
destruction
of
condemnation
valuation
date
shall
be
distributed
to
Owner,
and
the
balance
of
such
surplus,
if
any,
shall
be
distributed
to
the
Authority.
14. Effective
Date.
The
rights
and
obligations
of
the
Authority
and
Owner
set
forth
in
this
Agreement
shall
be
effective
as
of
the
Effective
Date.
15. Term
of
Agreement
and
Option.
The
restrictions
contained
herein
and
the
Authority's
option
to
purchase
the
Property
shall
continue
for
a
period
of
forty-five
(45)
years
commencing
on
the
Effective
Date.
16. Notices.
Except
as
otherwise
specified
in
this
Agreement,
all
notices
to
be
sent
pursuant
to
this
Agreement
shall
be
made
in
writing,
and
sent
to
the
Parties
at
their
respective
addresses
specified
below
or
to
such
other
address
as
a
Party
may
designate
by
written
notice
delivered
to
the
other
Party
in
accordance
with
this
Section.
All
such
notices
shall
be
sent
by:
(a)
personal
delivery,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
upon
receipt;
(b)
certified
or
registered
mail,
return
receipt
requested,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
two
(2)
business
days
after
deposit,
postage
prepaid
in
the
United
States
mail;
(c)
nationally
recognized
overnight
courier,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
one
(1)
day
after
deposit
with
such
courier;
or
(d)
facsimile
transmission,
in
which
case
notice
shall
be
deemed
delivered
on
transmittal,
provided
that
a
transmission
report
is
generated
reflecting
the
accurate
transmission
thereof.
Agency:
City
ofMilpitas
Housing
Authority
455
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
Attn:
Executive
Director
Owner:
Danny
Dias
1377
Coyote
Creek
Way
Milpitas,
CA
95035
17. Remedies
Upon
Breach.
a.
Specific
Performance.
Owner
acknowledges
that
any
breach
in
the
performance
of
its
obligations
under
this
Agreement
shall
cause
irreparable
harm
to
the
Authority.
Owner
agrees
that
the
Authority
is
entitled
to
equitable
relief
in
the'
form
of
specific
performance
upon
its
exercise
of
the
Option,
and
that
an
award
of
damages
shall
not
be
adequate
to
compensate
the
Authority
for
Owner's
failure
to
perform
according
to
the
terms
of
this
Agreement.
b.
Other
Remedies.
Authority
shall
have
all
of
the
remedies
provided
for
at
law
or
equity.
18. General
Provisions.
a.
Attorneys'
Fees.
If
either
party
initiates
legal
proceedings
to
interpret
or
enforce
its
rights
under
this.
Agreement,
the
prevailing
party
in
such
action
shall
he
entitled
to
an
award
of
reasonable
attorneys'
fees
and
costs
in
additions
to
any
other
recovery
to
which
it
is
entitled
under
this
Agreement.
_
___
_
_
b.
No
Joint
Venture;
No
Third-Party
Beneficiary.
No
joint
venture
or
other
partnership
exists
or
is
created
between
the
Parties
by
virtue
of
this
Agreement.
Except
as
expressly
stated
herein,
this
Agreement
does
not
benefit
any
third
party.
c.
Successors;
Assignment.
This
Agreement
shall
inure
to
the
benefit
of
and
shall
be
binding
upon
the
Parties
to
this
Agreement
and
their
respective
heirs,
executors,
administrators,
successors
and
assigns.
Authority
shall
have
the
right
to
assign
all
of
its
rights
and
obligations
under
this
Agreement
without
the
consent
of
Owner.
d.
Entire
Agreement;
-Amendment.
This
Agreement
constitutes
the
entire
agreement
of
the
Parties
with
respect
to
the
subject
matter
hereof,
and
supersedes
any
and
all
other
prior
negotiations,
correspondence,
understandings
and
agreements
with
respect
thereto.
There
are
no
representations,
promises,
agreements
or
other
understandings
between
the
Parties
relating
to
the
subject
matter
of
this
Agreement
that
are
not
expressed
herein.
This
Agreement
may
be
modified
only
by
an
instrument
in
writing
executed
by
the
Parties
or
their
respective
successors
in
interest.
e.
Survival;
No
Merger.
All
of
the
terms,
provisions,
representations,
warranties
and
covenants
of
the
Parties
under
this
Agreement
shall
survive
the
close
of
escrow
of
any
sale
of
the
Property
and
shall
not
be
merged
in
any
deed
transferring
the
Property.
f.
Authority
And
Execution.
Each
Party
represents
and
warrants
that
it
has
full
power
and
authority
to
enter
into
this
Agreement
and
to
undertake
all
of
its
obligations
hereunder,
that
each
person
executing
this
Agreement
on
its
behalf
is
duly
and
validly
authorized
to
do
so.
g.
Severability.
The
invalidity
or
unenforceability
of
any
term
or
provision
of
this
Agreement
shall
not
impair
or
affect
the
remainder
of
this
Agreement,
and
the
remaining
terms
and
provisions
hereof
shall
not
be
invalidated
but
shall
remain
in
full
force
and
effect.
h.
Waiver;
Modification.
No
waiver
or
modification
of
this
Agreement
or
any
covenant,
condition,
or
limitation
herein
contained
shall
be
valid
unless
in
writing
and
duly
executed
by
the
Party
to
be
charged
therewith.
No
evidence
or
any
waiver
or
modification
shall
be
offered
or
received
in
evidence
in
any
proceedingÿ
arbitration,
or
litigation
between
the
Parties
arising
out
of
or
affecting
this
Agreement
or
the
rights
or
obligations
of
any
Party
hereunder,
unless
such
waiver
or
modification
is
in
writing
and
duly
executed
as
aforesaid.
The
provisions
of
this
section
may
not
be
waived
except
as
herein
set
forth.
A
waiver
or
breach
of
any
covenant,
condition
or
provision
of
this
Agreement
shall
not
be
deemed
a
waiver
of
any
other
covenant,
condition
or
provision
hereof.
i.
,
Construction.
The
section
headings
and
captions
used
in
this
Agreement
are
for
convenience
of
reference
only
and
shall
not
modify,
define,
limit
or
amplify
any
of
the
terms
or
provisions
hereof.
This
Agreement
shall
not
be
construed
as
if
it
had
been
prepared
by
one
of
the
Parties,
but
rather
as
if
both
Parties
have
prepared
it.
-j.
-
Governing-Law.—
This-Agreementshall-in-all-respects-be-govemed-by-and-
construed
in
accordance
with
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California.
k.
Time
of
the
Essence.
Time
is
of
the
essence
in
this
Agreement
as
to
each
provision
in
which
time
is
an
element
of
performance.
1:
Further
Assurances.
Each
Party
will,
upon
reasonable
request
of
the
-
other
Party,
execute,
acknowledge,
and
deliver,
or
cause
to
be
executed,
acknowledged,
and
delivered,
such
further
instruments
and
documents
as
may
be
reasonably
necessary
in
order
to
fulfill
the
intents
and
purposes
of
this
Agreement.
m.
Counterparts.
This
Agreement
may
be
executed
in
counterparts,
each
of
which
shall
be
deemed
an
original,
and
all
which
together
shall
constitute
one
and
the
same
instrument.
IN
WITNESS
WHEREOF,
the
undersigned
have
caused
this
Agreement
to
be
executed
as
of
the
date
first
written
above.
OWNER(S):
Danny.Dias
AUTHORITY:
CITYOFlvStPi;
XJSING
AUTHORITY
illiams,
Executive
Director
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State
of
California
Countyof
_
Santa
Clara
_
)
On
O&n&SK
Jf.
20/4
before
me,
Kathy
Ynegas,
Notary
Public
*
(insert
name
and
title
of
the
officer)
personally
appeared
si/i
_
_
,
who
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence
to
be'
the
personjjs)%hose
namejj&f
is
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me
that
he/ifcgftbef
executed
the
same
in
ÿ
his/hÿjjefff
authorized
capacityfee)",
and
that
by
his/ljefi'ftjÿff
signaturefÿon
the
instrument
the
personjjaÿor
the
entity
upon
betfalf
of
which
the
persopÿsÿcted,
executed
the
instrument.
I
certify
under
PENALTY
OF
PERJURY
under
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California
that
the
foregoing
paragraph
is
true
and
correct.
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal.
Signa
77 KATHY
YNEGAS
Commission
#
2017728
Notary
Public
California
I
Santa
Clara
County
g
KATHY
YNEGAS
I
Commission
#
2017728
ft
Notary
Public
California
I
Santa
Clara
County
g
r—
.
!
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State
of
California
Countv
of
Santa
Clara
)
-
On
ftfl.fi
fl/f]?-
/5~
to/Z
before
me.
Kathy
Ynegas,
Notary
Public
~
'
(insert
name
and
title
of
the
officer)
1
/
Dersonallv
aDDeared
/
A
f
who
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence
to
be
the
persoijfef
whose
namajsf
\s/$ec?
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me'that
he/§W]yrÿ
executedthe
same
in
his/p&Jtfeÿir
authorized
capacity@e§£
and
that
by
his/fceF/tjlteif
signaturejjsÿon
the
instrument
the
personÿ
or
the
entity
upon
behalf
of
which
the
personfeÿHcted,
execCited
the
instrument.
1 certify
under
PENALTY
OF
PERJURY
under
the
laws
of
the
State
of
California
that
the
foregoing
paragraph
is
true
and
correct.
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal.
1 KATHY
YNEGAS
j
Commj8,ion
*
2017728
&
.
Sianaturÿ*?ÿÿÿvÿf
fSeal)
/
CERTIFICATE
OF
ACCEPTANCE
(Pursuant
to
Government
Code
§27281)
This
is
to
certify
that
the
interest
in
real
property
conveyed
by
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement
dated
October
15,
2014
from
Danny
Dias
to
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
is
hereby
accepted
by
the
undersigned
office
or
agent
on
behalf
of
the
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
pursuant
to
authority
conferred
by
the
Resolution
No.
7714
dated
November
6,
2007
Dated:
.
ptA
<&<*
—
EXHIBIT
A
Legal
Description
of
Site
THE
LAND
REFERRED
TO
HEREIN
BELOW
IS
SITUATED
IN
THE
CITY
OF
MILPITAS.
COUNTY
OF
SANTA
CLARA.
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA.
AND
IS
DESCRIBED
AS
FOLLOWS:
ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL
NO.
086-01-046
EXHIBIT
B
FORM:
NOTICE
OF
INTENT
TO
TRANSFER
VIA
CERTIFIED
MAIL
-
RETURN
RECEIPT
REQUESTED
To:
CITY
OF
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
,
455
East
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
_
AttnÿAuthorityJExecutive-Director
-
ÿ
-
Date:
_
Re:
Notice
of
Intent
to
Transfer
Pursuant
to
the
terms
of
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement,
dated
_
,
the
undersigned
Owner(s),
_
,
hereby
give(s)
notice
of
his/her/their
intent
to
transfer
the
property
located
at
_
:
_
,
Milpitas,
California
(the
"Property").
Owner
may
be
contacted
at
the
Property
or
at
the
following
address:
Owner's
daytime
telephone
number
is
(
_
)
[If
applicable:
The
proposed
transfer
of
the
Property
is
to
the
following
person(s):
Name:
_
Address:
Telephone:
(
_
)
The
proposed
transfer
is
(check
one):
ÿ
Sale
ÿ
Other
Specify:
Owner(s)
signature(s):
0 EXHIBIT
C
FORM:
NOTICE
OF
EXERCISE
Date:
_
To:
_
Owner
or
Transferee
Address
Re:
Notice
of
Exercise
(
The
City-
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
("Authority")
hereby
gives
notice
that
it
is
exercising
its
option
to
purchase
the
real
property
located
at
_
9 Milpitas,
California.
The
option
has
been
granted
to
the
Authority
pursuant
to
the
Resale
Restriction
and
Option
to
Purchase
Agreement
between
Owner
and
the
Authority
dated
_
and
recorded
on
_
as
Instrument
No.
_
.
[The
Authority
has
assigned
its
option
to
purchase
the
real
property
to
_
.]
An
escrow
for
the
purchase
will
be
opened
with
the
*
Chicago
Title
Company.
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
By:
_
ÿ
Its:
EXHIBIT
D
BASE
RESALE
PRICE
WORKSHEET
Date:
Owner:
Address:
Purchase
Price:
Date
of
Purchase:
Years
Owned:
years
METHOD
#1:
CALCULATION
BASED
ON
INCREASE
IN
MEDIAN
INCOME***
Present
Median
Income:
$
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(at
time
of
sale
of
unit)
Effective
Date:
Original
Median
Income:
$
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(at
time
of
purchase
of
unit)
Effective
Date:
Amount
of
Increase:
Family
of
four,
County
of
Santa
Clara
(Present
median
income
minus
original
median
income)
Increase
in
Price:
X
x
=
Method
#1
Resale
Price:
+
ÿ
=
METHOD
#2:
CALCULATION
BASED
ON
INCREASE
IN
MEDIAN
INCOME
Present
CPI:
Effective
Date:
Original
CPI:
Effective
Date:
Rate
of
Increase:
per
annum
Increase
in
Price:
X
x
=
Method
#2
Resale
Price:
+
Based
on
the
above,
the
base
resale
price
as
of
this
date,
,
is:
By:
I
EXHIBIT
E
REQUEST
FOR
NOTICE
OF
DEFAULT
Order
No.
Escrow
No.
Loan
No.
WHEN
RECORDED
MAIL
TO:
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority
455
East
Calaveras
Boulevard
Milpitas,
CA
95035
Attn:
Authority
Executive
Director
(Space
Above
This
Line
For
Recorder's
Use
Only)
REQUEST
FOR
NOTICE
UNDER
SECTION
2924b
CIVIL
CODE
In
accordance
with
Section
2924b,
Civil
Code,
request
is
hereby
made
that
a
copy
of
any
Notice
of
Default
and
a
copy
of
any
Notice
of
Sale
under
the
Deed
of
Trust
recorded
as
Instrument
No.
_
'
_
on
_
,
_
,
in
the
Official
Records
of
Santa
Clara
County,
California,
and
describing
land
therein
as:
executed
by
_
:
_
,
as
Trustor,
in
which
_
is
named
as
Beneficiary,
and
_
__
_
,
as
Trustee,
be
mailed
to
the
City
of
Milpitas
Housing
Authority,
455
Calaveras
Boulevard,
Milpitas,
California
_
,
Attn:
By:_
_
NOTICE:
A
COPY
OF
ANY
NOTICE
OF
DEFAULT
AND
OF
ANY
NOTICE
OF
SALE
WILL
BE
SENT
ONLY
TO
THE
ADDRESS
CONTAINED
IN
THIS
RECORDED
REQUEST.
IF
YOUR
ADDRESS
CHANGES,
A
NEW
REQUEST
MUST
BE
RECORDED.
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA
)
)
COUNTY
OF
_
)
On
_
before
me,
_
.
_
,
a
Notary
Public
in
and
for
said
county
and
state,
personally
appeared
_
.
_
_
personally
known
to
me
(or
proved
to
me
on
the
basis
of
satisfactory
evidence)
to
be
the
person(s)
whose
name(s)
is/are
subscribed
to
the
within
instrument
and
acknowledged
to
me
that
he/she/they
executed
die
same
in
his/her/their
authorized
capacity(ies),
and
that
by
his/her/their
signature(s)
on
the
instrument
the
person(s),
or
the
entity
upon
behalf
of
which
the
person(s)
acted,
executed
the
instrument
WITNESS
my
hand
and
official
seal.
Signature
_
(This
area
for
official
notarial
seal)
i
)
ÿ
EXHIBIT
F
DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT
THERE
ARE
RESTRICTIONS
ON
THE
SALE
OF
THE
PROPERTY
YOU
ARE
BUYING.
EXCEPT
FOR
A
TRANSFER
TO
THE
CITY
FOLLOWING
CITY'S
EXERCISE
OF
ITS
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE,
THIS
PROPERTY
MAY
ONLY
BE
SOLD
TO
AN
"ELIGIBLE
HOUSEHOLD"
AT
A
PRICE
NOT
TO
EXCEED
-XHEAD
JUSTEDRESALEPRIGE-WHIGHTS-GAPPEILATAN-ÿAFFORD
ABLE-
HOUSING
COST."
THIS
MEANS
THAT
YOU
MAY
NOT
SELL
THE
PROPERTY
FOR
MARKET
VALUE
TO
WHOMEVER
YOU
LIKE.
THESE
RESTRICTIONS
WILL
BE
IN
EFFECT
UNTIL
October
1 5,
2059
SALE
OF
THE
PROPERTY
IN
VIOLATION
OF
THE
RESTRICTIONS
SHALL
BE
VOIDABLE
AT
THE
ELECTION
OF
THE
CITY.
TO
DETERMINE
WHO
AN
ELIGIBLE
HOUSEHOLD
IS,
AND
WHAT
THE
ADJUSTED
RESALE
PRICE
AND
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
COST
ARE,
YOU
SHOULD
CONTACT
THE
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
(FORMER
CITY
OF
MILPITAS
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY).
YOU
SHOULD
ALSO
READ
THE
RESALE
RESTRICTION
AND
OPTION
TO
PURCHASE
AGREEMENT
RECORDED
AGAINST
THE
PROPERTY.
YOU
MAY
OBTAIN
A
COPY
FROM
THE
MILPITAS
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
OR
FROM
THE
ESCROW
COMPANY.
I
HAVE
READ
THE
FOREGOING
AND
I
UNDERSTAND
WHAT
IT
MEANS.
BUYER-DannyT)ias
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution to Accept the Improvements, Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and issue a Notice of Final Acceptance after the One-Year Warranty of Council Chamber Audio-Visual System Replacement, CIP No. 3498 (Staff Contact: Daniel Nam, Information Technology Director, 408-586- 2712)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Development
Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to accept the improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and issue a Notice of Final Acceptance after the one-year warranty of Council Chamber Audio-Visual System Replacement, CIP No. 3498.
BACKGROUND:
On December 12, 2023, the City Council awarded a construction contract to PCD Inc. for the Council Chamber AV Replacement Project, Project No. 3498 (Project), in the amount of $835,768.08 and authorized the City Manager to execute contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $79,231.92. The Project is included in the adopted 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which provides for the removal of the outdated audio-visual (AV) system and the implementation of a modern AV system to ensure efficient and reliable public access to Council meetings and other public meetings held in the City’s Council Chamber. In addition, the City Council also approved enhancements to the AV systems in other public areas, including the Committee Meeting Room, the City Hall lobby, and the pre-function space adjacent to the Council Chamber.
ANALYSIS:
The AV system construction began on July 1, 2024, and core AV capabilities were available in time for the September 3, 2024, City Council meeting. The project was completed successfully on an expedited timeframe and within budget. The upgraded Council Chamber now features state-of-the-art display technology, audio conferencing, and live streaming capabilities. Significant improvements were also made to the Committee conference room, including the addition of multiple presentation displays to enable optimal use of space, projection screens, accessibility-compliant equipment, and automation capabilities to improve ease of use.
Enhancements in the Council Chamber, Committee Meeting Room, and the City Hall Lobby area are now complete and fully operational. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment a) granting acceptance of the Project and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion (Attachment b) in accordance with the provisions of Section 9204 of the Civil Code. Staff further recommends the City Council authorize the City Engineer to issue a notice of final acceptance after the one-year warranty period without further City Council action, provided that all warranty work is completed to the satisfaction of the Information Technology Director.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative: Do not adopt Resolution and deny Project acceptance, deny filing a notice of completion.
Pros: None.
Cons: A denial would result in the City being unable to release any funds remaining back into the Project budget.
Reason for Not Recommending: Denial would result in the City being unable to close out the Project and release any funds remaining back into the Project budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funding is requested for the Project as the Project is now complete. The Information Technology Department will be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the improved system and has sufficient budget and vendor support for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Any additional funding required for ongoing maintenance will be requested through future budget appropriations when the City Council adopts the annual operating budget for the Department.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
Per the definition provided in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378, the replacement of new AV systems does not qualify as a project for the purpose of CEQA as this action has no potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Based on staff’s findings, this project is under categorical exemption (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) from the requirement of CEQA.
ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Resolution
(b) Notice of Completion
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS GRANTING ACCEPTANCE OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AV REPLACEMENT, CIP NO. 3498 WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas has heretofore entered into a contract with PCD Corporation, for the Council Chamber AV Replacement, CIP No. 3498 (“Project”), in the amount of $835,768.08, and the Information Technology Director of the City of Milpitas has recommended acceptance of said improvement as completed in accordance with plans, specifications and approved change orders and correction lists, and in accordance with the final inspection of the City Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. The City of Milpitas does hereby accept said improvement as completed on this 17th day of June, 2025, and does hereby authorize and direct the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas to file a Notice of Completion in accordance with the provisions of Section 9204 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and does hereby authorize and direct the City Engineer to file a Certificate of Completion in accordance with the provisions of Section 4005 of the Government Code of the State of California, if said work was by day’s labor or force account.
3. The City Council authorizes the City Engineer to issue the Notice of Final Acceptance after the one-year warranty period without further City Council action, provided all required warranty repairs are completed to the satisfaction of the Information Technology Director; and nothing herein contained shall in any way be deemed to be a waiver, release or relinquishment by City of any obligations imposed upon the contractor or its surety, or sureties, by law or by the above-referenced improvement contract, save and except those obligations specifically mentioned herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _________ day of ________, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
2 Resolution No. ____
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Suzanne Guzzetta, City Clerk Carmen Montano, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christopher Creech, Acting City Attorney
3 Resolution No. ____
Recording Requested by and
When Recorded Mail to:
City of Milpitas
455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, CA 95035
Attention: City Clerk
Record without fee under
Section 6103 - Government Code
State of California
CITY OF MILPITAS
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Civil Code Section 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. On or about December 12, 2023, the City Council of the City of Milpitas, a municipal corporation of the State of California, whose address is City Hall, 455 East Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, California, 95035 (as owner) entered into a contract for work of: Council Chamber AV Replacement, Project No. 3498.
2. A description of the site of which the City is co-owner for said work of improvement is: 455 East Calaveras Blvd. in the City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County, California, more particularly described on the plans.
3. The name and address of the direct contractor is: PCD Inc., 1032 Maxwell Drive, Santa Rosa, CA 95401.
4. A general statement of the kind of work done or materials furnished to the City is as follows: The Project provides for installation of a new audio-visual system in the City’s Council Chamber and Committee Meeting Room.
5. Said work of improvement was accepted by the Milpitas City Council as complete on June 17, 2025. ************************************************************************************* I, the undersigned, declare that I am the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas and am authorized to execute the foregoing Notice of Completion and this Verification thereof. I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Completion is true and correct. Executed on June ____, 2025 at Milpitas, California. __________________________________
Michael Silveira, City Engineer
City of Milpitas
_____________________________________________________________________________________ NOTE: RECORD WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE WITH COUNTY RECORDER OF
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Recording Requested by and
When Recorded Mail to:
City of Milpitas
455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, CA 95035
Attention: City Clerk
Record without fee under
Section 6103 - Government Code
State of California
CITY OF MILPITAS
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Civil Code Section 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. On or about December 12, 2023, the City Council of the City of Milpitas, a municipal corporation of the State of California, whose address is City Hall, 455 East Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, California, 95035 (as owner) entered into a contract for work of: Council Chamber AV Replacement, Project No. 3498.
2. A description of the site of which the City is co-owner for said work of improvement is: 455 East Calaveras Blvd. in the City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County, California, more particularly described on the plans.
3. The name and address of the direct contractor is: PCD Inc., 1032 Maxwell Drive, Santa Rosa, CA 95401.
4. A general statement of the kind of work done or materials furnished to the City is as follows: The Project provides for installation of a new audio-visual system in the City’s Council Chamber and Committee Meeting Room.
5. Said work of improvement was accepted by the Milpitas City Council as complete on June 17, 2025. ************************************************************************************* I, the undersigned, declare that I am the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas and am authorized to execute the foregoing Notice of Completion and this Verification thereof. I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Completion is true and correct. Executed on June ____, 2025 at Milpitas, California. __________________________________
Michael Silveira, City Engineer
City of Milpitas
_____________________________________________________________________________________ NOTE: RECORD WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE WITH COUNTY RECORDER OF
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Amendment to the Agreement with Ascent Environmental for Consultant Services Related to Preparation of the Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan (Staff Contact: Jay Lee, Planning Director, 408-586-3077)
Category: Community Development
Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: (1) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Ascent Environmental for consulting services related to preparation of the Gateway-Main Street Specific Plan, extending the Agreement end date to June 30, 2026 with a maximum compensation amount for the amendment of $85,000 and a maximum compensation amount for the entire Agreement of $1,144,708; and (2) Approve a budget appropriation of $75,004 from Capital Improvement Program Project, No. 3460 to 3437.
BACKGROUND:
The Milpitas Midtown Specific Plan was originally adopted by City Council in 2002 to maximize land use, transportation, and economic opportunities along the City’s historic Main Street and to energize and catalyze mixed-use, transit-oriented development in the Midtown area, also known as the “heart” of Milpitas. Since adoption of the current Midtown Specific Plan, little of the community’s vision for this area has been realized, and many potential development sites remain vacant and underutilized, especially along Main Street. As part of the update process, the Midtown Specific Plan will be renamed the “Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan” and will provide a new vision and strategic policy framework to guide redevelopment and reinvestment in three focus areas and transform this important gateway into an attractive and vibrant destination for the City and the region.
On April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted the FY2022-26 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which included the Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Plan (Midtown Specific Plan Update) as Project No. 3437 with an initial outlay of up to $960,000 from the Community Planning Fund. On May 26, 2021, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) awarded the City of Milpitas an additional $500,000 through its Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grant Program to complete the project.
On March 16, 2021, the Purchasing Division released RFP No. 2515 seeking proposals from qualified vendors with demonstrated experience in municipal planning services to assist the City with the Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan (Midtown Specific Plan Update). Following a competitive evaluation process in accordance with the City Municipal Code, the top firm, Ascent Environmental, was invited to continue in the evaluation process by providing a detailed scope of work with the proposed compensation for all services outlined in the RFP.
On September 21, 2021, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a master funding agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to receive funding through the PDA Planning Grant Program and a professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental for consultant services to prepare the Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan.
The initial project budget was $930,708. Per Section I-2-3.21 of the Milpitas Municipal Code, the Purchasing Agent is authorized to execute amendments up to 10 percent of a contract (over $100,000) or $20,000,
whichever is less, and up to $40,000 in cumulative amendments. As such, the Purchasing Agent twice executed amendments to the Professional Services Agreement with Ascent Environmental to increase the project budget by $19,500 each time, for a total budget increase of $39,000, resulting in a project budget of $969,708. These amendments also extended the termination date from June 30, 2023 to June 30, 2024.
On April 16, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental to reallocate budget amounts between tasks and increase the overall project budget by $90,000, resulting in a new contract amount of $1,059,708.
On June 18, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental to extend the agreement term 12 months, from June 30, 2024 to June 30, 2025, with no change in compensation.
ANALYSIS:
Tasks 1-3, which include existing conditions assessments, extensive community outreach, plan visioning, scenario planning, and preferred plan strategies, have been completed. Task 4 (Specific Plan Drafting) and Task 5 (Environmental Evaluation) are underway, and the Public Draft Plan and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were completed in April 2025. Following public review of the Public Draft Plan and Subsequent EIR, the project team will continue to refine the plan and environmental analysis and aim for adoption hearings in late summer 2025.
An additional amendment to the professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental is needed to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $85,000. An additional $60,000 is needed to complete Task 4 (Specific Plan Drafting) and an additional $25,000 is needed to complete Task 6 (Plan Adoption).
Per Milpitas Municipal Code Section I-2-3.21, contract amendments for contracts greater than $100,000 resulting in a cumulative increase of 15 percent of the original award or $40,000, whichever is less, require City Council approval.
The original scope of work, budget, and timeline were initially prepared in 2021. At that time, there were several unknowns regarding the scope of work:
1. The project area and boundary;
2. Preparation and inclusion of specific zoning regulations and development standards within the Specific Plan; and
3. The existing condition of utilities and infrastructure within the plan area.
Throughout the preparation of the plan, the project area has expanded to annex adjacent neighborhoods which would benefit from inclusion into the plan area. An additional redevelopment focus area was also added to maximize the development potential of new opportunity sites. Additionally, City staff determined the scope of work should also include preparing zoning regulations and development standards to ensure consistency between the Specific Plan and Milpitas Zoning Ordinance upon plan adoption rather than amending the zoning map and text later. Furthermore, the existing condition of utilities and infrastructure within the plan area requires additional analysis and utility improvements to ensure that future development will be adequately served.
Due to the added complexity to the scope of work, a prior amendment extended the agreement termination date from June 30, 2024 to June 30, 2025. However, the added complexity to the scope of work also required more extensive revisions to the Administrative and Public Drafts of the Plan than originally anticipated, particularly to Chapters 7 (Infrastructure and Public Services) and 8 (Administration and Implementation) to ensure adequate utilities and infrastructure will be available to accommodate the additional development envisioned in the Plan. Furthermore, the City is currently reviewing several development applications within the Plan area, which has resulted in further revisions to Plan drafts. As such, the agreement termination date needs to be extended from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Do not approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional
Services Agreement with Ascent Environmental for consultant services related to the preparation of the Gateway-Main St. Specific Plan.
Pros: None.
Cons: Failure to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Ascent Environmental would result in the City being unable to finish updating the Midtown Specific Plan and forgoing $500,000 in approved PDA grant funds, which need to be expended within 36 months of execution of a funding agreement with MTC. Without the Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan, the existing Midtown Specific Plan would remain in place. Absent new policies and standards to facilitate catalytic development, the Main Street area and Calaveras Corridor would likely continue to suffer from disinvestment and a lack of identity. The City would potentially miss out on the opportunity to revitalize an important area of the city.
Reason not recommended: In light of the City’s anticipated Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), the Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan is needed to help Midtown realize its full development potential and support regional and state efforts to address critical housing needs. If Midtown is unable to accommodate more housing development, it will be more challenging to meet the City’s RHNA obligation. Moreover, the Milpitas Gateway/Main Street Specific Plan is needed to implement the vision of the recently adopted General Plan, which establishes Midtown as a key opportunity area for new economic growth and development in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed contract amendment requires a budget appropriation of $85,000, with $75,004 from CIP Project No. 3460 (Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Update) to 3437 (Gateway-Main St. Specific Plan). Staff anticipates completing the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) Update by late summer of this year and does not expect further amendments to the consultant contract for that project (Lisa Wise Consulting). The remaining $9,996 will be funded by unused professional services monies for the Housing Opportunity Districts (HODs) scope of work. Therefore, the proposed contract amendment would not require additional funds from the General Fund.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
The action has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project pursuant to Pub. Resources Code, § 21065 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378. Even if a project, the action is exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None.
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Approve a Waiver to the Competitive Procurement Process for Crossing Guard Services and Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Amendment to the Master Services Agreement for Crossing Guard Services with All-City Management Services, Inc. (Staff Contact: Luz Cofresí-Howe, Finance Director, 408-586-3111; and Jared Hernandez, Chief of Police, 408-586- 2406)
Category: Consent Calendar-Public Safety
Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: (1) Approve a waiver to the competitive procurement process for Crossing Guard Services; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Master Services Agreement for Crossing Guard Services with All-City Management Services, Inc. to extend the term of the Agreement for one additional year through July 31, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $873,464 for the additional year of services for a revised total not-to-exceed amount of $2,482,913 for the full three-year term.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of the Milpitas Crossing Guard Program is to provide crossing guard assistance to children and pedestrians at intersections along school routes thereby enhancing public safety. The City of Milpitas adopted its current Crossing Guard Program (Program) in 2006 and posts those guards primarily at certain intersections with high volumes of school-age pedestrians and vehicles consistent with the State of California Manual of Traffic Control Devices. Other factors considered for determining which intersections are staffed with crossing guards include vehicle sight distance obstructions, traffic accident history, complex roadway geometry design, safety, City Council support and/or Chief of Police support. The Program has been and remains funded with General Fund monies.
From its adoption through the FY 2022-2023 school year, the Program was managed directly by the Milpitas Police Department. On June 20, 2023, the City Council authorized a one-year agreement (Agreement) with All-City Management Services, Inc. (ACMS) to provide crossing guard services. Section I-2-3.06 of the Milpitas Municipal Code allows the award of contracts without traditional competitive procurement when the Purchasing Agent determines that there are not other available sources for the services or that there is a compelling reason for using only one source. ACMS as a sole source provider was approved by the City Purchasing Agent pursuant to the City Municipal Code Section I-2-3.06 Sole Source Procurement. On July 10, 2023, the City entered into the Agreement with ACMS with a term of July 10, 2023 through July 31, 2024 and a maximum compensation of $781,858. The Milpitas Police Department still oversees the contract with ACMS.
On June 4, 2024, the City Council approved funding for the Agreement for an additional year. On June 5, 2024, staff issued an Option Notice to ACMS, notifying them of a contract extension through July 31, 2025 and adding $827,591 to cover costs for the additional year of services. With the Option Notice, the revised maximum compensation for the full two-year term of the agreement is $1,609,449.
When the City selected ACMS for these services, ACMS was the only provider of full-service crossing guard services in Santa Clara County and the surrounding regions. There are now other crossing guard service providers in the region. However, there is compelling reason for continuing to use ACMS as a sole source provider, as it has not yet been determined if these alternative providers can offer the services necessary in
Milpitas. As the City does not have sufficient time to complete a comprehensive solicitation process for these services by the beginning of the upcoming school year, on June 6, 2025, pursuant to the City Municipal Code Section I-2-3.06 Sole Source Procurement, the City Purchasing Agent approved ACMS as a sole source provider for these services for one additional year pending completion of a competitive procurement.
ANALYSIS:
A school-age pedestrian crossing count data collection study conducted in November 2022 analyzed 34 locations. This study identified 21 intersections that met the criteria for crossing guards. The existing 37-guard model covers 28 intersections and exceeds what would minimally be recommended based on the study findings. A lapse in overall services without an alternative option or sufficient community notice could have a detrimental impact on public safety for the community.
The City plans to conduct a solicitation for these services over the next year. City Council approval of this recommendation will ensure there is no lapse is crossing guard services while the competitive process is completed. As such, the Administration requests the City Council approve a waiver to the competitive procurement process for crossing guard services, pursuant to Milpitas Municipal Code Section I-2-3.03(d) Procurements where competitive methods are not practicable where the City is not required to engage in competitive procurement as authorized by the City Council to be in the best interest of the City, and to extend the current Master Services Agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. for a one-year period at a cost of $873,464 for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Do not approve a waiver to the procurement process or authorize the amendment to extend the current Master Services Agreement with ACMS.
Pros: The City has the option to pursue a competitive bidding process for crossing guard services, which could lead to a more favorable agreement with improved terms and conditions. Alternatively, the City could choose to eliminate the contractual services and transition the services back to the Police Department.
Cons: Given the City’s limited timeframe to conduct a thorough solicitation process for these services, this approach could lead to a gap or total withdrawal of crossing guard services. Additionally, the Police Department is already facing staffing constraints, making it unlikely there will be sufficient Police resources to assume this responsibility in time.
Reason for Not Recommending:
While pursuing a competitive bidding process for crossing guard services presents the potential for more favorable terms, the risks of transitioning these services back to the Police Department outweigh the benefits.
The limited timeframe for a thorough solicitation could result in a gap or complete loss of services, jeopardizing public safety. Furthermore, the Police Department is currently experiencing staffing constraints, making it improbable they would be able to effectively manage crossing guard duties in a timely manner. Therefore, the Administration recommends the City Council approve a waiver to the competitive procurement process for Crossing Guard Services and authorize an amendment to the Agreement for Crossing Guard Services with All- City Management Services, Inc.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding in the amount of $873,464 is included in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Adopted, Amended Budget for these services.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
The action has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project pursuant to Pub. Resources Code, § 21065 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378. Even if a project, the action is exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The action is continuing administrative activity related to staffing of certain services and therefore is not a project pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None.
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution to Accept the Improvements, Authorize the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion and Issue a Notice of Final Acceptance After the One-Year Warranty for ARPA Parks Rehabilitation, CIP Nos. 3500, 3501, 5110; (Staff Contact: Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602; and Michael Silveira, City Engineer, 408-586-3303)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Development
Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to accept the improvements and Authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and issue a Notice of Final Acceptance after the one-year warranty for ARPA Parks Rehabilitation, CIP Nos. 3500, 3501, 5110.
BACKGROUND:
On April 2, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Bay Construction Co. (Contractor) for the ARPA Parks Rehabilitation, CIP Nos. 3500, 3501, 5110 (Project) in the amount of $2,532,000. The Project is included in the FY 2025-2029 Adopted Capital Improvement Program and provides for construction to address health and safety repairs and short-term improvements at thirteen (13) parks including Ben Rodgers, Foothill, Hidden Lake, Murphy, Oliver W. Jones Memorial, Parc Metro West, Robert E. Browne, Sandalwood, Sinnott, Strickroth, Starlite, Sunnyhills Albert Augustine Jr. Memorial, and Tom Evatt. The work included installing ADA- compliant features where feasible, replacing aging site furnishings, improving and repairing picnic areas and pathways, improving fitness station and playground areas, and upgrading restroom fixtures to comply with current Building Codes.
ANALYSIS:
The Project was successfully completed on time and within budget. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) granting acceptance of the Project and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion (Attachment B) in accordance with the provisions of Section 9204 of the Civil Code. Staff also recommends the City Council authorize the City Engineer to issue a Notice of Final Acceptance after the one- year warranty period without further City Council action, provided that all warranty work is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE:
Alternative: Do not adopt a Resolution for Project acceptance and filing the Notice of Completion to begin the one-year warranty.
Pros: None
Cons: A denial would result in the City being unable to accept the completed improvements and commence the one-year warranty in accordance with the contract documents, release the retention to the Contractor and release any funds remaining back into the Project budget.
Reason not Recommended: Since the Contractor has completed the Project in accordance with the approved contract documents, a denial to accept the Project could be considered as a breach of contract and risk a possible claim by the Contractor.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as the Project has been completed within the approved budget. The Public Works Department will be responsible for maintenance and operations of the improvements. Any required additional
funding for ongoing maintenance will be requested through future budget appropriations as the City Council considers and adopts the annual operating and capital budgets.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT:
The Project entails replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced and is therefore exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15302.
ATTACHMENTS:
(a) Resolution and Notice of Completion
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS GRANTING ACCEPTANCE OF THE ARPA PARKS REHABILITATION, CIP NOS. 3500, 3501, 5110 WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas has heretofore entered into a contract with Bay Construction for the ARPA Parks Rehabilitation, CIP Nos. 3500, 3501, 5110 (“Project”), in the amount of $2,532,000, and the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas has recommended acceptance of said improvements as completed in accordance with plans, specifications and approved change orders and correction lists, and in accordance with the final inspection of said City Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. The City of Milpitas does hereby accept said improvements as completed on this 17 th day of June, 2025, and does hereby authorize and direct the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas to file a Notice of Completion in accordance with the provisions of Section 9204 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and does hereby authorize and direct the City Engineer to file a Certificate of Completion in accordance with the provisions of Section 4005 of the Government Code of the State of California, if said work was by day’s labor or force account.
3. The City Council authorizes the City Engineer to issue the Notice of Final Acceptance after the one-year warranty period without further City Council action, provided all required warranty repairs are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and nothing herein contained shall in any way be deemed to be a waiver, release or relinquishment by City of any obligations imposed upon the contractor or its surety, or sureties, by law or by the above- referenced improvement contract, save and except those obligations specifically mentioned herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _________ day of ________, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
2 Resolution No. XXXX
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Suzanne Guzzetta, City Clerk Carmen Montano, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christopher Creech, Acting City Attorney
Recording Requested by and
When Recorded Mail to:
City of Milpitas
455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, CA 95035
Attention: City Clerk
Record without fee under
Section 6103 - Government Code
State of California
CITY OF MILPITAS
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Civil Code Section 9204)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. On or about April 2, 2024, the City Council of the City of Milpitas, a municipal corporation of the State of California, whose address is City Hall, 455 East Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, California, 95035 (as owner) entered into a contract for work of: ARPA Parks Rehabilitation, CIP No. 3500, 3501, 5110.
2. A description of the site of which the City is co-owner for said work of improvement are located at: Ben Rodgers, Foothill, Hidden Lake, Murphy, Oliver W. Jones Memorial, Parc Metro West, Robert E.
Browne, Sandalwood, Sinnott, Strickroth, Starlite, Sunnyhills Albert Augustine Jr. Memorial, and Tom Evatt Parks in the City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County, California, more particularly described on the plans.
3. The name and address of the direct contractor is: Bay Construction, 4026 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Oakland, CA 94609.
4. A general statement of the kind of work done or materials furnished to the City is as follows: The Project provides for health and safety repairs and short-term improvements at 13 City parks.
5. Said work of improvement was accepted by the Milpitas City Council as complete on June 17 th, 2025. ************************************************************************************* I, the undersigned, declare that I am the City Engineer of the City of Milpitas and am authorized to execute the foregoing Notice of Completion and this Verification thereof. I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Completion is true and correct.
Executed on ________, 2025 at Milpitas, California.
________________________________
_ Michael Silveira, City Engineer
City of Milpitas
__________________________________________________________________________________ NOTE: RECORD WITHIN 15 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE WITH COUNTY RECORDER OF SANTA
CLARA COUNTY
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Improvement Agreement with Stratford School, Inc. at 1323 Great Mall Drive (Staff Contact: Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602; and Michael Silveira, City Engineer, 408-586-3303)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Development
Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Improvement Agreement with Stratford School, Inc., for the construction of public improvements at 1323 Great Mall Drive.
BACKGROUND:
On August 13, 2024, the City Council approved the Site Development Permit No. SD23-0012, Conditional Use Permit No. UP23-0008, and Environmental Assessment No. EA24-0001 to remodel the existing office building and construct a new gymnasium building, trash enclosure, and associated site improvements at 1323 Great Mall Drive (Project) by Stratford School, Inc. (Developer).
ANALYSIS:
The Developer has agreed to enter into an Improvement Agreement (Attachment A) with the City for the construction of public improvements for the Project which will be constructed concurrently with the on-site work. The public improvements to be constructed and accepted by the City include the installation of a new fire water service and irrigation recycled water service, and other miscellaneous items of work identified on the public improvement plans. The improvements will be completed within one year from the date of the Improvement Agreement, and the work is guaranteed by bonds or similar securities to be posted by the Developer in the amount of $77,000.
The City Engineer has reviewed the public improvement plans (2-1469) and is recommending the City Council approve the Improvement Agreement to allow for the construction of public improvements to proceed.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative: Deny approval of Improvement Agreement.
Pros: None
Cons: The denial of approval of the Improvement Agreement will cause construction of the offsite public improvements to be delayed and will prevent the Developer from occupying the newly remodeled and constructed building.
Reason for Not Recommending: Staff recommends the approval of the Improvement Agreement for construction of the offsite public improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Developer will reimburse the City for costs associated with plan review, permitting and construction inspection for offsite public improvements constructed by the Developer. The City will have perpetual ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the public improvements following construction and acceptance of the Project after the one-year warranty period has expired. The Public Works Department provides funding for future maintenance of newly accepted City infrastructure through their operating budget which is subject to annual appropriations.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
The Planning Department completed an environmental impact assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on the assessment, decided to prepare an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Project in accordance with CEQA, and State and local guidelines implementing CEQA. On May 29, 2024, the City provided a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a mitigated negative declaration to the public, responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and the County Clerk.
On June 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, during which meeting the Planning Commission considered the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), heard a presentation from staff, had the opportunity to hear from members of the public and closed the public hearing on the item. The Planning Commission found that its actions are consistent with CEQA and recommended the City Council adopt the proposed Stratford Preparatory School Project IS/MND, found there is neither a fair argument nor substantial evidence that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment, and found the project and the City’s approval thereof consistent with CEQA and its implementing guidelines.
On August 13, 2024, the Milpitas City Council, under Resolution 9350, found that it had been presented with the Stratford Preparatory School Project IS/MND, reviewed and considered it, and further found that the IS/MND is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA, and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines and that the IS/MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Therefore, the City Council adopted the IS/MND based on the entirety of the record of the proceedings.
ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Improvement Agreement
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Amend the Purchase Order for On-Call Repairs, and Negotiate and Execute an Amendment to the Agreement with Environmental Systems, Inc. for the City Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems (Staff Contact: Luz Cofresí-Howe, Finance Director, 408-586-3111; and Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to (1) Amend the Purchase Order with Environmental Systems, Inc. for as-required repairs of the City heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems to add $150,000 for a revised not-to-exceed amount of $250,000 and extend the term through September 30, 2027, subject to the appropriation of funds; and (2) Negotiate and execute an amendment to the Maintenance Services Agreement for the City heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems to extend the term of the Agreement through September 30, 2027, subject to the appropriation of funds.
BACKGROUND:
On September 1, 2020, the City Council authorized staff to enter into a Maintenance Services Agreement with Environmental Systems Inc. (ESI), based on the results of a competitive Request for Proposal issued by the City on April 16, 2020. The Agreement was executed on September 14, 2020, has a term of October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2025, and an original not-to-exceed compensation of $214,708. On October 5, 2021, City Council authorized staff to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to increase maximum compensation to $454,198. Amendment No. 1 was executed on October 27, 2021.
On October 17, 2024, the City issued a Purchase Order under the City Manager’s contract authority to Environmental Systems Inc. (ESI) for On Call Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Repair Services for a one-year term beginning October 1, 2024 and ending September 30, 2025 and a maximum compensation of $100,000. This Purchase Order was approved as a sole source by the Purchasing Agent on September 10, 2024 pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code Section I-2-3.06 Sole Source Procurement. To date, a total of $57,769 has been spent against the Purchase Order for various HVAC repairs throughout the City, leaving a current remaining balance of $42,231.
ANALYSIS:
The City plans to conduct a solicitation to replace existing HVAC systems at certain City locations within the next two years. The solicitation will cover ongoing maintenance and repair services for the replaced HVAC systems, as well as other HVAC systems, but the solicitation will not be completed before the Purchase Order and Maintenance Services Agreement expire on September 30, 2025.
To provide additional funding for as-required HVAC repair services until the solicitation is complete, staff requests approval to amend the current Purchase Order to extend it for up to two additional years through September 30, 2027, and to increase the Purchase Order by $150,000 for a revised not-to-exceed amount of $250,000. The current Maintenance Services Agreement has sufficient funds, but staff is requesting an extension through September 30, 2027 so that these two contracts will continue to be available through the duration of the expected future procurement.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Do not authorize the City Manager, or designee, to amend the Purchase Order and Maintenance Services Agreement with ESI.
Pros: None.
Cons:
1. There would potentially be insufficient funds to address future HVAC repair needs.
2. The Purchase Order and Maintenance Services Agreement will lapse on September 30, 2025, before the new solicitation and associated work are completed thereby leaving staff with no contract vehicle for as- required repairs and maintenance services.
Reason not recommended: Due to the importance of repairing and maintaining the City HVAC infrastructure, especially as the weather becomes warmer, a current and funded Purchase Order for On Call HVAC Repair Services and Maintenance Services Agreement are imperative to maintain facilities in good operational condition.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval to amend this Purchase Order would increase the total not-to-exceed amount from $100,000 to $250,000. Sufficient funds were included in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Project No. 3462 – Facilities On-Call, that was approved by City Council on June 3, 2025, for this Purchase Order amendment.
No additional funds are requested for the Maintenance Services Agreement.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
City Council approval of these amendments is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA Guideline 15301 given that this project amounts to maintenance of existing public structures and facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None.
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Water Supply Agreement Between the City and County of San Francisco and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County (Staff Contact:
Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602) Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 6/17/2025
Recommendation: (1) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an amendment to the Water Supply Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County; and (2) Adopt a resolution to approve the updated Tier 2 Drought Response Implementation Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Milpitas receives water from two wholesale agencies: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) and Valley Water (VW). Water from SFPUC is brought through SFPUC’s Regional Water System (SF RWS) to the City via two transmission lines, and then delivered to Milpitas customers through the City- maintained distribution system. Approximately 70% of the water purchased by the City is from SFPUC through the Water Supply Agreement.
Water Supply Agreement History
On May 27, 2003, the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) was formed to represent the interests of 24 cities and water districts, and two private utilities, in Alameda, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties that purchase water on a wholesale basis (Wholesale Customers) from the SF RWS. The City of Milpitas is a member of BAWSCA and one of the Wholesale Customers of the SF RWS.
In June 2009, the City entered into a Water Supply Agreement with the City and County of San Francisco (San Francisco) and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County (2009 WSA). The 2009 WSA establishes the terms by which the twenty-six (26) Wholesale Customers purchase water from the RWS.
From time to time, the WSA and associated governing plans are amended to address needed changes identified by either the Wholesale Customers or SFPUC in response to changing conditions. The last amendment to the WSA was approved in 2021.
This report’s recommended actions seek to address three main updates negotiated among the SFPUC and Wholesale Customers:
1. Easing the Minimum Purchase Requirements applied to the Original Minimum Purchase Customers;
2. Revising the method for allocating water to individual agencies under the Tier 2 Drought Allocation Plan; and
3. Considering total collective wholesale water purchases in the Tier 1 Drought Allocation Plan excess water use charges
The SFPUC approved these actions at their meeting on May 13, 2025. Each of the Wholesale Customers is in the process of taking these amendments and plan updates to their respective City Councils or Boards for adoption.
ANALYSIS:
Water Supply Agreement Amendment to Adjust Minimum Purchase Requirements The City of Milpitas is one of the four Original Minimum Purchase Customers; other customers include the cities of Mountain View and Sunnyvale, and the Alameda County Water District. Existing Section 3.07 of the 2021 WSA provides that the Original Minimum Purchase Customers may purchase water from sources other than SFPUC, but are each obligated to purchase a specific minimum annual quantity of water from SFPUC, referred to as a Minimum Purchase Requirement. If a Minimum Purchase Customer does not meet its Minimum Purchase Requirement in a particular fiscal year, it must pay SFPUC for the difference between its metered water purchases during the fiscal year and its minimum annual purchase quantity set forth in Attachment E of the 2021 WSA.
In June 2023, following several years of discussions regarding the Minimum Purchase Requirements, the SFPUC proposed amending the 2021 WSA to reset the existing annual minimum purchase quantities to align with current water consumption trends while protecting investment in the RWS. Through the remainder of 2023, the SFPUC, Original Minimum Purchase Customers, and BAWSCA held multiple meetings to identify amendments that would address challenges related to the Minimum Purchase Requirements. Once the SFPUC and the Original Minimum Purchase Customers finalized their recommended amendments to the Minimum Purchase Requirements, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers presented the proposals to the broader Wholesale Customers group to secure their support. Negotiations among the Wholesale Customers were concluded in Fall 2024.
Through this proposed amendment the following three changes to the Minimum Purchase Requirement are to occur:
1.1 20% Reduction of Annual Minimum Purchase Quantities (MPQ) MPQs set in the 1984 Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract were calculated based on 80% of each of the four Original Minimum Purchase Customer’s purchases from the RWS in the 1980s. The MPQs were later reduced by 5% as part of the 2009 WSA. Upon adoption of this amendment, the minimum annual purchase quantities of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers will be reset to 80% of each of the Minimum Purchase Customer average purchases from the most recent four (4) non-drought years. While the number of residents and businesses in Milpitas has increased over the last 40 years, water consumption has actually gone down due to a combination of water efficiency technologies, water conservation regulations, programs, and education, and other factors. Consequently, by updating these minimums, the City’s current MPQ will decrease by 20%, providing a better buffer as per capita water use decreases due to ongoing water efficiency and conservation as well as providing greater flexibility for the City to purchase or secure necessary water from alternative sources. The amendment will establish a continuing, periodic review of the minimum annual purchase quantities on a 10-year cycle.
1.2Allow for Drought Rebound Year Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity Existing Section 3.07.C of the 2021 WSA provides that MPQs will be waived during drought, other periods of water shortage on the RWS, or if the Governor declares a state of emergency that affects water supply use or deliveries from the RWS. Minimum Purchase Requirements are reinstated in the first year immediately following a drought. However, water use does not rebound to pre-drought levels for several years, depending on the level of conservation achieved.
The amendment provides a temporary, one-year reduction in the minimum annual purchase quantities equal to half the demand reduction from pre-drought levels to allow for drought rebound.
For example, if a Minimum Purchase Customer’s pre-drought use and minimum annual purchase quantity are 10 million gallons per day (MGD) and drought RWS purchases are 8 MGD, the Rebound Year minimum annual purchase quantity will be set at 9 MGD.
1.3 Collective Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities
Existing Section 3.07 of the 2021 WSA provides if a Minimum Purchase Customer does not meet its Minimum Purchase Requirement in a particular fiscal year, it must pay the SFPUC for the difference between its metered water purchases during the fiscal year and its minimum annual purchase quantity. This amendment provides that the collective purchases from all four Original Minimum Purchase Customers will be considered together before an individual Original Minimum Purchase Customer is required to pay the difference between its metered water purchases and its
Minimum Purchase Requirement. If collective purchases are more than the sum of minimum annual purchase quantities, payments to the SFPUC for Original Minimum Purchase Customer(s) who did not meet its Minimum Purchase Requirement will not be required. If collective purchases are less than the sum of minimum annual purchase quantities, payments to the SFPUC for an Original Minimum Purchase Customer(s) who did not meet its Minimum Purchase Requirement will be proportionate to its share of total under-usage.
It is assumed the Minimum Purchase Requirements were originally designed to prevent four (4) specific multi- source agencies from shifting from the RWS to other imported water sources, and were established to provide some level of water demand certainty for planning purposes. However, for SFPUC to meet long term water demand (increasing due to population and economic growth within the service area) and to increase supply reliability during extended droughts, SFPUC also must invest in costly alternative water supplies. The Minimum Purchase Customers are well-positioned to develop their own local, drought-resilient supplies, which would reduce the regional dry-year supply gap, improving reliability of the RWS for all users, but have no incentive to do so if that reduces water purchases from SFPUC below the Minimum Purchase Requirement. These amendments may reduce the perceived existing disincentive to improve efficiency and develop alternative supplies.
The proposed amendments also include some administrative cleanup of language that is not substantive in nature.
Conclusion
The proposed changes to the Minimum Purchase Requirements are favorable to the City of Milpitas.
During normal operating conditions, Milpitas SFPUC purchases exceed the City Minimum Purchase Requirement. However, Milpitas has had to pay for not meeting the Minimum Purchase Requirement three times in the past decade. In each case, the respective payment was required immediately after a drought period when water use had not yet rebounded. Under the proposal, Milpitas’ Minimum Purchase Requirement would be reset from 5.314 million gallons per day (mgd) to 4.37 mgd. It is projected the City will have no issues meeting the reduced Minimum Purchase Requirement. Additionally, the “drought rebound” and “collective purchases” clauses provide an additional grace period and buffer for the City after periods of water restrictions and heightened conservation actions. Had these clauses already existed in the WSA, the City would not have had to pay the Minimum Purchase penalties in the past and would have saved rate payers from that expense.
Water Allocation During Drought (Tier 1 and Tier 2 Plans) The WSA governs the water supply guaranteed to Wholesale customers during normal conditions and includes plans for allocating water during drought conditions. The WSA includes water allocation plans for RWS cutbacks of up to 20% of normal available water supply. The WSA refers to these plans as the Tier 1 Plan and Tier 2 Plan. The Tier 1 Plan specifies the method by which available water is allocated between two collective groups: SF retail customers and Wholesale Customers. The Tier 2 Plan specifies how the Wholesale Customers’ water is then allocated to the individual member agencies. During mandatory calls for water use reductions, individual agencies that exceed their allocation are subject to “excess use charges.” The relationship of these plans and the RWS is illustrated below.
Figure 1. Regional Water System Water Supply and Tier 1 Plan and Tier 2 Plan Relationship
The WSA authorizes the Wholesale Customers to adopt a methodology for allocating the water collectively available from the RWS among the twenty-six Wholesale Customers during system-wide shortages caused by drought (Tier 2 Plan). SFPUC is not a party to the Tier 2 Plan. The existing Tier 2 Plan was adopted in 2011 and originally set to expire in 2018. Since adoption, conditions impacting water use have changed (e.g., water supply sources, water use trends, land use, and customer base). During the 2021 to 2023 drought, the Tier 1 and Tier 2 Plans were implemented for the first time. At that time, it became clear that the existing Tier 2 Plan no longer operated as originally intended and that an update was necessary.
In January 2021, BAWSCA began facilitating an update to the Tier 2 Plan. Between January 2022 and June 2024, BAWSCA and the Wholesale Customers, supported by a consulting firm providing technical and modeling expertise, met at least 62 times, most often for half-day, in-person meetings and smaller virtual sub- group sessions, to negotiate the terms of the updated Tier 2 Plan. In June 2024, the Wholesale Customers concluded negotiations on the updated Tier 2 Plan, and agency representatives collectively agreed that they were ready to recommend the Tier 2 Plan to their governing bodies for adoption. A summary of the key guiding principles and allocation methodology is discussed below.
The updated Tier 2 Plan maintains many of the key elements of the existing Tier 2 Plan, such as a rolling base period that captures service area growth over time and inclusion of an individual Supply Guarantee (ISG). The updated Tier 2 Plan also provides necessary updates to ensure a minimum supply of RWS water for base/indoor use for the portion of each service area where RWS is delivered.
The Wholesale Customers collectively developed four policy principles to guide the development and performance of the updated Tier 2 Plan. These policy principles are outlined below:
•Policy Principle #1 - Provide sufficient water for the basic health and safety needs of customers. •Policy Principle #2 - Minimize economic and other adverse impacts of water shortages on customers and the BAWSCA region.
•Policy Principle #3 - Provide predictability of drought allocations through consistent and predetermined rules for calculation, while allowing for flexibility to respond to unforeseen circumstances.
•Policy Principle #4 - Recognize benefits of, and avoid disincentives for, water use efficiency and development of alternative water supply projects.
The updated Tier 2 Plan establishes a sequential allocation formula to determine how the available water from the RWS will be allocated among the individual Wholesale Customers. The allocation formula can generally be described as follows:
•The Minimum and Maximum Cutback establish the upper and lower bounds for each Wholesale Customer’s final allocation. The Minimum Cutback is equal to 1/3 of the Overall Average Wholesale Customer Reduction, but no less than 5%. The Maximum Cutback is equal to 1.5 times the Overall Average Wholesale Customer Reduction.
•Each Wholesale Customer is allocated water on a residential per capita basis based on the State Indoor Water Use Efficiency Standard1 and the portion of each Wholesale Customer’s water demand met by the RWS.
•Each Wholesale Customer is allocated water based on its estimated non-residential indoor use by applying a cutback factor equal to half of the Overall Average Wholesale Customer Reduction to each 1 SB 1157 (Hertzberg), signed into law in September 2022, established the standard for efficient indoor residential water use be 47 gallons per capita per day, lowering to 42 GPCD in 2030.
Wholesale Customer’s estimated non-residential indoor demand, also known as Base Period purchase, from the RWS.
•Each Wholesale Customer is allocated water based on its estimated seasonal purchases from the RWS.
•Remaining water is allocated to bring each Wholesale Customer’s final allocation as close to its “Target Allocation” as possible, while ensuring that each Wholesale Customer’s final allocation is between the Minimum and Maximum Cutback bounds. The Target Allocation is based on a weighted share of (1) the Wholesale Customer’s Base Period purchases from the RWS and (2) its ISG.
When the SFPUC declares a water shortage emergency, it determines whether voluntary or mandatory rationing is required. At the end of the 12-month drought period, each Wholesale Customer’s purchases from the RWS are compared to their annual drought allocation. Excess use charges are only applied during mandatory rationing periods to Wholesale Customers whose water purchases exceed their annual drought allocation.
During Tier 2 Plan negotiations, agencies expressed concerns with the application of excess use charges since differences in community demographics, housing stock, or industry composition, may make certain communities better positioned to meet calls for water conservation. The new Tier 1 Family Plan ensures that excess use charges are only applied when the collective Wholesale Customer usage exceeds the Tier 1 allocation. If this occurs, excess use charges will be proportionally applied to agencies that exceeded their individual Tier 2 Allocations.
For example, if the twenty-six Wholesale Customers collectively exceed the Tier 1 allocation by 2 MGD, and only two agencies exceed their Tier 2 Allocations by 3 MGD each, then these two agencies will share the excess use charges proportionally.
Conclusion
Milpitas participated in the development of the updated Tier 2 Plan and has reviewed the Tier 2 model formulas and calculations. Staff does not believe there are any significant negative effects on the City’s calculated water supply allocation during RWS shortages. Through the model developed by BAWSCA and its consultant, Milpitas’ water allocation is not significantly higher than the systemwide cut-backs under different condition scenarios. Additionally, the inclusion of the Tier 1 Family Plan provides additional protection from the application of excess use charges.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Do not adopt the resolutions or approve the amendment to the Water Supply Agreement Pros: None.
Cons: All parties to the WSA must adopt the amendments and associated plans for the amendments to be executed. If Milpitas does not approve, all agencies will be impacted, and these amendments and plan updates will not be implemented.
Reason for Not Recommending: Not adopting the proposed amendments and changes will result in continued application of the existing Minimum Purchase Requirements, and Milpitas will need to continue to pay when its water purchases do not meet the Minimum Purchase Quantity. This penalty impacts water rates for all City customers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed changes to the Minimum Purchase Requirements and related provisions will be financially favorable to the City. It will eliminate any payments for water not purchased by the City. The City has incurred Minimum Purchase payments in the past that range from $10,000 to $275,000 during three past fiscal years.
This will reduce the likelihood of these penalties impacting the operating budget of the Water Fund going forward. Additionally, the proposed Tier 1 “family plan” provision may also buffer the City from potentially incurring excess water usage charges during periods of mandatory water use restrictions.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
The action has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project pursuant to Pub. Resources Code, § 21065 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378. Even if a project, the action is exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The action is a fiscal or administrative activity of the City government that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is not a project pursuant to Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 14, § 15378.
ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Resolution for Water Supply Agreement Amendment
(b) Amendment to the Water Supply Agreement Approval
(c) Resolution for Updated Tier 2 Plan Drought Response Implementation Plan (d) Updated Tier 2 Plan Drought Response Implementation Plan
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MILPITAS AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS
IN ALAMEDA COUNTY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, AND SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
WHEREAS, water supply agencies in Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties have purchased water from the City and County of San Francisco (San Francisco) for many years; and WHEREAS, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) operates the Regional Water System (RWS), which delivers water to communities in Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties, as well as to customers within San Francisco (collectively, “the Parties”); and WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the “Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract between the City and County of San Francisco and Certain Suburban Purchasers in San Mateo County, Santa Clara County and Alameda County” in 1984 (1984 Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract); and
WHEREAS, in April 2003, water supply agencies in Alameda, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties (collectively referred to as the Wholesale Customers) established the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA), as authorized by Water Code Sections 81300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, upon expiration of the 1984 Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract, the Parties entered into the “Water Supply Agreement between San Francisco and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County” (Water Supply Agreement or WSA) on July 1, 2009, authorized by SFPUC Resolution No. 09-0069, dated April 28, 2009; and WHEREAS, in 2017, the Wholesale Customers directed BAWSCA to act as its authorized representative in discussions and negotiations with San Francisco to amend the Water Supply Agreement to address a number of substantive issues and these negotiations resulted in the Parties' adoption of the Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement in 2018 authorized by SFPUC Resolution No. 18-0212, dated December 11, 2018; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to WSA Section 3.07, four Wholesale Customers (Alameda County Water District and the Cities of Milpitas, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale, collectively, the “Original Minimum Purchase Customers”) may purchase water from sources other than the SFPUC, but they are each obligated to purchase a specific minimum annual quantity of water from the SFPUC, referred to as a “Minimum Purchase Requirement;” and
WHEREAS, historically, if a Minimum Purchase Customer does not meet its Minimum Purchase Requirement in a particular fiscal year, it must pay the SFPUC for the difference between its metered water purchases during the fiscal year and its minimum annual purchase quantity set forth in WSA Attachment E; and
2 Resolution No. xxxx
WHEREAS, some Original Minimum Purchase Customers pay the SFPUC for water that is not delivered due to either insufficient potable demand within their service area or conservation efforts during drought rationing; and
WHEREAS, in 2019, the Wholesale Customers directed BAWSCA to draft a proposed amendment to the 2018 WSA to provide a procedure for expedited and permanent transfers of minimum annual purchase quantities that safeguards the financial and water supply interests of Wholesale Customers not participating in such transfers and these negotiations resulted in the Parties' adoption of the Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement in 2021, authorized by SFPUC Resolution No. 21-009, dated January 26, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the 2021 WSA provided a significant, but incomplete solution to address the Original Minimum Purchase Customer’s concerns with the minimum purchase quantities through a transfer process; and
WHEREAS, 2021 WSA Section 3.11.C. provides that the Tier 1 Shortage Plan (Attachment H to the WSA) will be used, during system-wide shortages of 20% or less, to allocate water from the Regional Water System between Retail and Wholesale Customers ; and WHEREAS, 2021 WSA Section 3.11.C. further provides that the SFPUC will honor allocations of water among the Wholesale Customers (Tier 2 Allocations) unanimously agreed to by all Wholesale Customers or provided by BAWSCA; and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the SFPUC and BAWSCA implemented the Tier 1 and Tier 2 Plans for the first time; and
WHEREAS, throughout 2022 and 2024, the Wholesale Customers convened at least once per month, most often for half-day in-person workshops, to negotiate an update to the method for sharing water made available from the SFPUC during shortages caused by drought (Tier 2 Plan); and WHEREAS, each Wholesale Customer appointed a lead negotiator to represent the interests of its agency in the negotiations; and
WHEREAS, during the Tier 2 Plan negotiations, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers renewed discussions among the Wholesale Customers to identify a comprehensive and final solution to concerns about the minimum purchase quantities; and
WHEREAS, during the Tier 2 Plan negotiations, the Wholesale Customers identified, and the SFPUC agreed to, changes to the Tier 1 Plan that would facilitate agreement on the updated Tier 2 Plan; and
WHEREAS, in June 2023, following several years of discussions regarding the Minimum Purchase Requirements, the SFPUC proposed amending the 2021 WSA to reset the existing minimum annual purchase quantities to align with current water consumption trends, while protecting investment in the RWS; and
WHEREAS, in 2024, the SFPUC, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers, and BAWSCA held multiple meetings to identify amendments that would address challenges related to the Minimum Purchase Requirements; and
3 Resolution No. xxxx
WHEREAS, once the SFPUC and the Original Minimum Purchase Customers discussed amendments to the Minimum Purchase Requirements, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers presented proposals to the broader Wholesale Customer group to secure their support; and WHEREAS, in 2024, the negotiating teams for the Wholesale Customers came to a final agreement on a package that includes an updated Tier 2 Plan, amendments to the minimum purchase quantity requirements, and amendments to the Tier 1 Plan; and WHEREAS, with its Alternative Water Supply Program, the SFPUC is in the early stages of planning for projects to support the Wholesale and Retail Customers' ability to respond to climate change and address future water supply challenges and vulnerabilities, such as regulatory changes, earthquakes, disasters, emergencies, and increases in population and employment; and WHEREAS, the City of Mountain View approved a Recycled Water Feasibility Study Update Draft Report on March 22, 2022 with seven staff recommendations, including: (1) working with the City of Palo Alto and the Santa Clara Valley Water District on the first phase of an advanced water purification system to improve recycled water quality, (2) planning and siting a recycled water storage reservoir in the City of Mountain View’s North Bayshore Area to improve system performance and reliability, and (3) building-out the recycled water distribution system to serve all of North Bayshore and a portion of NASA Ames; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sunnyvale approved an updated Recycled Water Master Plan on September 24, 2024 and directed staff to look into expanding the recycled water system, which currently includes 22 miles of recycled water pipelines, two recycled water pump stations, and a recycled water storage tank with a 2.5-million-gallon capacity; and
WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas continues to promote the use of recycled water to existing and new customers along the recycled water pipeline within the city, and has committed to developing local groundwater supplies to help meet projected long term water demand; and WHEREAS, since 1995, the Alameda County Water District has invested over $300 million in water supply reliability initiatives to enhance local water supplies and reduce its dependence on imported supplies, including water conservation, conjunctive use groundwater management, brackish groundwater desalination, and groundwater banking; and
WHEREAS, as of January 2025, the SFPUC has budgeted $298.3 million over the next ten years to fund water supply projects; and
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to approve an amendment to the 2021 WSA to reduce the minimum annual purchase quantities to 80% of average purchases from the most recent four (4) non- drought years and establish a continuing, periodic review of the minimum annual purchase quantities on a 10-year schedule; and
WHEREAS, the amendment will also establish a Rebound Year minimum annual purchase quantity calculation for the first year following a waiver of the Minimum Purchase Requirements; and WHEREAS, the amendment further provides that Imputed Sales will not apply to an Original Minimum Purchase Customer that does not meet its individual Minimum Purchase Requirements if the
4 Resolution No. xxxx
collective SFPUC purchases from all Original Minimum Purchase Customers are equal to or greater than the total collective minimum annual purchase quantity; and WHEREAS, the Parties also desire to adopt an amendment to the Tier 1 Plan to provide that excess use charges will not apply to Wholesale Customers that exceed their individual annual shortage allocation if the Wholesale Customers collective SFPUC purchases are less than the total Tier 1 allocation; and
WHEREAS, the amendment further provides that if the collective Wholesale Customers’ SFPUC purchases exceed total Tier 1 allocation, excess use charges will be applied to each Wholesale Customer that exceeded its individual annual allocation, proportional to the collective Wholesale Customer's overuse of the total Tier 1 allocation; and
WHEREAS, the Parties also desire to adopt an amendment to the 2021 WSA to include the following substantive modifications:
a) update references in Section 2.03.C regarding BAWSCA’s authority to amend attachments; b) extend the timing of the completion of the WSIP to reflect the currently adopted program completion date (Section 3.09);
c) correct a reference to a SFPUC resolution number in Section 9.07; d) update “Imputed Sales” definition in Attachment A to reference Attachment E; e) update “Level of Service Goals and Objectives” definition in Attachment A to reflect updated and expanded Level of Service Goals and Objectives adopted by the SFPUC in November 2023; and
WHEREAS, the SFPUC approved these amendments and authorized the execution of a 2025 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement incorporating these amendments on May 13, 2025 pursuant to SFPUC Resolution No. 25-0074; and
WHEREAS, the amendment considered now is not a "project" for the purposes of CEQA as it involves an administrative activity that does not result in a direct change to the environment (see 14 CCR Section 15378(b)(5)), and would not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (see 14 CCR Section 15060(c)(2)); and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. The City Council approves the revisions included in the attached Exhibit A, approves those revisions to be incorporated into a revised WSA titled the "2025 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement Between the City and County of San Francisco Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County" dated as of 2025 (2025 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement).
5 Resolution No. xxxx
3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute the 2025 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement, when final execution copies are prepared and distributed by BAWSCA.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Suzanne Guzzetta, City Clerk Carmen Montano, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christopher Creech, Acting City Attorney
1 Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments: Section 3.07
21706153.3
3.07. Restrictions on Purchases of Water from Others; Minimum Annual Purchases A. Each Wholesale Customer (except for Alameda County Water District and the cities of Milpitas, Mountain View and Sunnyvale) agrees that it will not contract for, purchase or receive, with or without compensation, directly or indirectly, from any person, corporation, governmental agency or other entity, any water for delivery or use within its service area without the prior written consent of San Francisco.
B. The prohibition in subsection A does not apply to:
1. recycled water;
2. water necessary on an emergency and temporary basis, provided that the Wholesale Customer promptly gives San Francisco notice of the nature of the emergency, the amount of water that has been or is to be purchased, and the expected duration of the emergency; or
3. water in excess of a Wholesale Customer’s Individual Supply Guarantee.
C. Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities. Alameda County Water District and the cities of Milpitas, Mountain View and Sunnyvale may purchase water from sources other than San Francisco, provided that San Francisco shall require that each purchase a minimum annual quantity of water from San Francisco. These Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities are set out in Attachment E and shall also be included in the Individual Water Sales Contracts between San Francisco and each of these four Wholesale Customers (collectively referred to as the Original Minimum Purchase Customers). Pursuant to Section 3.04, certain Wholesale Customers may also be required to purchase Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities, set out in Attachment E-1, from San Francisco. Attachment E will be updated pursuant to Section 3.04 to reflect any reduction in existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities and any addition of new Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities when Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities expire and are removed from Attachment E-1; Individual Water Sales Contracts between San Francisco and any Wholesale Customers who are participants in a transfer under Section 3.04 will similarly be amended, as necessary.
1. Annual Notice. After the end of each fiscal year, the SFPUC will send a written notice to each Wholesale Customer that is subject to the minimum annual purchase requirements of this section with a Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, or a Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity with a copy to BAWSCA. The notice will include: (1 Exhibit A
2 Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 202 5 Proposed
Amendments: Section 3.07
21706153.3
(a) the quantity of water delivered to the
each of those Wholesale CustomerCustomers
individually and all of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers collectively during the previous fiscal year; (
2 (b) each Wholesale Customer’s individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity (as adjusted for a Rebound Year, if applicable, under Section 3.07.C.2);
) whether or not the Wholesale Customer met its minimum annual purchase requirement under this section; (3
(c) whether or not each Wholesale Customer met its individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity (as adjusted for a Rebound Year, if applicable);
(d) whether or not the Original Minimum Purchase Customers collectively purchased a volume of water from San Francisco that is equal to or greater than the sum of their four Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (as adjusted for a Rebound Year, if applicable); (e) any Imputed Sales charged to the Wholesale Customer;Customers; and (4 (f) the status of any Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase QuantityQuantities of the Wholesale Customer, if applicable. Customers.
C.2. Waiver and Rebound Year. The minimum annual purchase requirements set out in Attachments E and E-1 will be waived during a Drought or other period of water shortage if the water San Francisco makes available to these Wholesale Customers is less than itstheir Minimum Annual Purchase QuantityQuantities or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities, and may be waived during a state of emergency declared by the Governor of California that impacts water supply use or deliveries from the Regional Water System. Once the waiver is no longer in effect, each of the minimum annual purchase requirements set out in Attachments E and E-1 shall be temporarily set, for one full fiscal year (referred to as the Rebound Year), to the midpoint between (1) the Wholesale Customer’s actual San Francisco purchases for the final year in which the waiver was in effect, up to a maximum of the Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, and (2) the Wholesale Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity set out in Attachment E or Attachment E-1, as applicable. Any fiscal year in which a Wholesale Customer meets its Rebound Year-adjusted Temporary Modified Minimum
3 Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 202 5 Proposed
Amendments: Section 3.07
21706153.3
Annual Purchase Quantity, but not its standard T
emporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase
Quantity, will not count as a fiscal year in which the Wholesale Customer has met or exceeded its Temporary Modified Minimum Purchase Quantity for the purposes of Section 3.04.C(4)(a).
D. Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity Reset. As shown on Attachment E, in Fiscal Year 2025-26, the Parties reset the then-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers to 80% of the average San Francisco purchases of each Customer over the four most recent non-drought years preceding Fiscal Year 2024-25, effective for Fiscal Year 2024-25. If the Parties extend the Term of this Agreement beyond June 30, 2034 pursuant to Section 2.02, the Parties will review the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers again ten years after the Fiscal Year 2025-26 reset. If the Original Minimum Purchase Customers, or San Francisco, want to propose a reset of the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities for Fiscal Year 2035-36, they will provide written notice on or before June 30, 2034. The Parties will meet and confer promptly to evaluate written reset proposals. By November 30, 2035, if the Parties have come to an agreement, the SFPUC will calculate the revised Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities based on the agreed upon methodology and provide written notice to the Original Minimum Purchase Customers and BAWSCA. The Original Minimum Purchase Customers will have at least 15 business days to review and meet and confer with the SFPUC with any questions or concerns before the revised quantities are finalized. If the Parties are unable to come to an agreement, the then-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities will remain unchanged. Any changes to the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities under this Section
3.07.D will be reflected in a revised Attachment E approved with the written concurrence of San Francisco and BAWSCA in accordance with Section 2.03.C. The Parties intend to include a continuing, periodic review of the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities on a ten-year schedule in the successor to this Agreement.
E. Collective Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities Considered Before Application of Imputed Sales. Imputed Sales will not apply to any of the individual Original Minimum Purchase Customers in a particular fiscal year if those Customers have collectively purchased a volume of water from San Francisco that is equal to or greater than the sum of their four Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities shown in Attachment E (or adjusted for a Rebound Year pursuant to Section
3.07.C.2, if applicable). If the Original Minimum Purchase Customers do not collectively purchase that sum, any Original Minimum Purchase Customer that has not met its standard or Rebound Year-adjusted Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity will be responsible for Imputed Sales proportional to its share of the difference between that sum and the Original Minimum Purchase Customers’ total purchases from San Francisco. Examples of this calculation are contained in
4 Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 202 5 Proposed
Amendments: Section 3.07
21706153.3
Attachment E-3.
21702335.2
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Res tated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments: Sections 2.03, 3.09, and 9.07, and Attachment A Definitions
2.03. Amendments .
C. Amendments to Attachments. The following attachments may be amended with the written concurrence of San Francisco and BAWSCA on behalf of the Wholesale Customers:
Attachment Name
C Individual Supply Guarantees (amendments reflecting Section
3.04 transfers only)
E Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (amendments reflecting Section 3.04 transfers and Section 3.07 resets only)
E-1 Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities G Water Quality Notification and Communications Plan
(as may be amended)
J Water Use Measurement and Tabulation
L-1 Identification of WSIP Projects as Regional/Retail
N-1 Balancing Account/Rate Setting Calculation Table
N-2 Wholesale Revenue Requirement Schedules
N-3 Schedule of Projected Water Sales, Wholesale Revenue Requirement and Wholesale Rates
P Management Representation Letter
R Classification of Existing System Assets (subject to Section
5.11)
Amendments to these attachments shall be approved on behalf of San Francisco by the Commission and on behalf of BAWSCA by its Board of Directors, unless the Commission by resolution delegates such authority to the General Manager of the SFPUC or the Board of Directors by resolution delegates such authority to the General Manager/CEO of BAWSCA.
21702335.2
3.09. Completion of WSIP
San Francisco will complete construction of the
physical facilities in the WSIP by
DecemberJune 30, 20212032. The SFPUC agrees to provide for full public review and comment by local and state interests of any proposed changes that delay previously adopted project completion dates or that delete projects. The SFPUC shall meet and consult with BAWSCA before proposing to the Commission any changes in the scope of WSIP projects which reduce their capacity or ability to achieve adopted Level of Service Goals and Objectives.
The SFPUC retains discretion to determine whether to approve the physical facilities in the WSIP until after it completes the CEQA process as set forth in Section 4.07.
9.07. City of Brisbane, Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District, Town of Hillsborough
A. The parties acknowledge that San Francisco has heretofore provided certain quantities of water to the City of Brisbane (“Brisbane”), Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District (“Guadalupe”) and the Town of Hillsborough (“Hillsborough”) at specified rates or without charge pursuant to obligations arising out of agreements between the predecessors of San Francisco and these parties, which agreements are referred to in judicial orders, resolutions of the SFPUC and/or the 1960 contracts between San Francisco and Brisbane, Guadalupe and Hillsborough. The parties intend to continue those arrangements and accordingly agree as follows:
1. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to alter, amend or modify the terms of SFPUC Resolution No. 74-06530053 or the indenture of July 18, 1908 between the Guadalupe Development Company and the Spring Valley Water Company.
2. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to alter, amend or modify the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Judgment dated May 25, 1961 in that certain action entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Town of Hillsborough in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Marin, No. 23282, as modified by the Satisfaction of Judgment filed October 23, 1961 and the Compromise and Release between Hillsborough and San Francisco dated August 22, 1961. The rights and obligations of Hillsborough under these documents shall continue as therein set forth.
3. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to affect or prejudice any claims, rights or remedies of Guadalupe or of Crocker Estate Company, a corporation, or of Crocker Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments: Sections 2.03, 3.09, and 9.07, and Attachment A Definitions
21702335.2
Land Company, a corporation, or of
San Francisco, or of their successors and assigns,
respectively, with respect to or arising out of that certain deed dated May 22, 1884, from Charles Crocker to Spring Valley Water Works, a corporation, recorded on May 24, 1884, in Book 37 of Deeds at page 356, Records of San Mateo County, California, as amended by that certain Deed of Exchange of Easements in Real Property and Agreement for Trade in Connection Therewith, dated July 29, 1954, recorded on August 4, 1954, in Book 2628, at page 298, Official Records of said San Mateo County, or with respect to or arising out of that certain action involving the validity or enforceability of certain provisions of said deed entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Crocker Estate Company, in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Marin, No. 23281.
Attachment A - Definitions
“Imputed Sales” apply when a Wholesale Customer does not meet the minimum ann ual
purchase requirements of Section 3.07.C, as shown on Attachment E and Attachment E-1, except in fiscal years in which a waiver of these requirements is in effect. Imputed Sales are calculated as the difference between (1) a Wholesale Customer’s metered water purchases during a fiscal year, from July 1 to June 30, and (2) the larger of (a) or (b) as follows: (a) the Wholesale Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, as specified in Attachment E and may be adjusted pursuant to Section 3.07.C.2, or (b) the Wholesale Customer’s Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, as specified in Attachment E-1. and may be adjusted pursuant to Section 3.07.C.2. If a Wholesale Customer has more than one Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, the largest quantity is used for calculating Imputed Sales. Imputed Sales are considered wholesale water usage for the purposes of calculating the Proportional Annual Use, and any fees charged for Imputed Sales are considered wholesale revenues.
“Level of Service Goals and Objectives” refers to the “Phased WSIP Goals and Objectives” adopted by the Commission in Resolution No. 08-0200 dated October 30, 2008 as part of the approval of the WSIP, as updated and expanded by the "2023 Amended and Updated Water Enterprise Level of Service Goals and Objectives," adopted by the Commission in Resolution No. 23-0210 dated November 28, 2023, and any amendments that may be adopted by the Commission.
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments: Sections 2.03, 3.09, and 9.07, and Attachment A Definitions
21715759.2
ATTACHMENT E
MINIMUM ANNUAL PURCHASE QUANTITIES
(Section 3.07.C)
AGENCY MINIMUM ANNUAL PURCHASE QUANTITY
(IN MGD)1
Alameda County Water District 7.6486.682
City of Milpitas 5.3414.371
City of Mountain View 8.9306.047
City of Sunnyvale 8.9307.412
1 In Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26, the then-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities for Alameda County Water District and the Cities of Milpitas, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale were reset to 80% of each of those four customers’ average San Francisco purchases over the four non-drought years preceding FY 2024-25 (FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20, and FY 2020-21), effective FY 2024-25. Prior to this reset, from the effective date of this Agreement (July 1, 2009) through FY 2023-24, those four customers had the following Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities:
1. Alameda County Water District: 7.648 MGD
2. City of Milpitas: 5.341 MGD
3. City of Mountai n View: 8.930 MGD
4. City of Sunnyvale: 8.930 MGD
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendment Attachment E
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
1 21606945.9
ATTACHMENT H
WATER S
HORTAGE ALLOCATION PLAN
This Interim Water Shortage Allocation Plan (“Plan"), also known as the Tier 1 Shortage Plan, describes the method for allocating water between the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC"), on the one hand, and the Wholesale Customers collectively, on the other, during shortages caused by drought. The Plan also implements a method for allocating water among the individual Wholesale Customers, known as the Tier 2 Drought Response Implementation Plan (“Tier 2 Plan”), which has separately been adopted by the Wholesale Customers and does not include the SFPUC. The Plan includes provisions for transfers, banking, and excess use charges. The Plan applies only when the SFPUC determines that a system-wide water shortage due to drought exists, and all references to “shortages” and “water shortages” are to be so understood. This Plan was initially adopted pursuant to Section 7.03(a) of the 1984 Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract and has been incorporated and updated to correspond to the terminology used in the June 2009 Water Supply Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County (“Agreement”), as amended and restated from time to time.
SECTION 1. SHORTAGE CONDITIONS
1.1. Projected Available SFPUC Water Supply. The SFPUC shall make an annual determination as to whether or not a shortage condition exists. The determination of projected available water supply shall consider, among other things, stored water, projected runoff, water acquired by the SFPUC from non- SFPUC sources, inactive storage, reservoir losses, allowance for carryover storage, and water bank balances, if any, described in Section 3.
1.2 Projected SFPUC Customer Purchases. The SFPUC will utilize purchase data, including volumes of water purchased by the Wholesale Customers and by Retail Customers (as those terms are used in the Agreement) in the year immediately prior to the drought, along with other available relevant information, as a basis for determining projected system-wide water purchases from the SFPUC for the upcoming year.Supply Year (defined as the period from July 1 through June 30).
1.3. Shortage Conditions. The SFPUC will compare the projected available water supply (Section 1.1) with projected system-wide water purchases (Section 1.2). A shortage condition exists if the SFPUC determines that the projected available water supply is less than projected system-wide water purchases in the upcoming Supply Year (defined as the period from July 1 through June 30).. When a shortage condition exists, SFPUC will determine whether voluntary or mandatory actions will be required to reduce purchases of SFPUC water to required levels.
1.3.1 Voluntary Response. If the SFPUC determines that voluntary actions will be sufficient to accomplish the necessary reduction in water use throughout its service area, the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers will make good faith efforts to reduce their water purchases to stay within their annual shortageTier 1 and Tier 2 allocations as applicable (see Section 2 of this Attachment H) and associated monthly water use budgets. The SFPUC will not impose excess use charges during periods of voluntary rationing, but may suspend the prospective accumulation of water bank credits, or impose a ceiling on further accumulation of bank credits, consistent with Section 3.2.1 of this Plan.
1.3.2 Mandatory Response. If the SFPUC determines that mandatory actions will be required to accomplish the necessary reduction in water use in the SFPUC service area, the SFPUC may implement excess use charges as set forth in Section 4 of this Plan.
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
2 21606945.9
1.4. Period of Shortage. A shortage period commences when the SFPUC determines that a water shortage exists, as set forth in a declaration of water shortage emergency issued by the SFPUC pursuant to California Water Code Sections 350 et seq. Termination of the water shortage emergency will be declared by resolution of the SFPUC.
SECTION 2. SHORTAGE ALLOCATIONS
2.1. Annual Tier 1 Allocations between the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers. The annual water supply available during shortages will be allocated between the SFPUC and the collective Wholesale Customers as follows:
Level of System Wide
Reduction in Water Use
Required
Share of Available Water
SFPUC Share Wholesale Customers Share
5% or less
6%
through 10%
11% through 15%
16% through 20%
35.5%
36.0%
37.0%
37.5%
64.5%
64.0%
63.0%
62.5%
This Plan refers to the SFPUC’s and Wholesale Customers’ respective shares of available water so established as the SFPUC’s and Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocations. The water allocated to the SFPUC shall correspond to the total allocation for all Retail Customers. In the event that the SFPUC share of the available water supply in the above table results in Retail Customers having a positive allocation (i.e., a supply of additional water rather than a required percentage reduction in water use), the SFPUC’s percentage share of the available water supply in the table shall be reduced to eliminate any positive allocation to Retail Customers, with a corresponding increase in the percentage share of the available water supply allocated to the Wholesale Customers. For any level of required reduction in system-wide water use during shortages, the SFPUC shall require Retail Customers to conserve a minimum of 5%, with any resulting reallocated supply credited to storage for inclusion in calculation of projected available water SFPUC water supply in a subsequent year (Section 1.1).
The parties agree to reevaluate the percentages of the available water supply allocated to Retail and Wholesale Customers by May 1, 2028.
2.2 Annual Tier 2 Allocations among the Wholesale Customers. The annual water supply allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively during system wide shortages of 20 percent or less (i.e., the Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocation) will be apportioned among them based on a methodology, known as the Tier 2 Plan, that has been separately adopted by all of the Wholesale Customers, and not the SFPUC, as described in Section 3.11(C) of the Agreement. In any year for which the methodology must be applied, the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (“BAWSCA”) will calculate each Wholesale Customer’s individual percentage share of the amount of water allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively pursuant to Section 2.1. Following the declaration or reconfirmation of a water shortage emergency by the SFPUC, BAWSCA will deliver to the SFPUC General Manager a list, signed by the President of BAWSCA’s Board of Directors and its General Manager, showing each Wholesale Customer together with its percentage share and stating that the list has been prepared in accordance with the methodology adopted by the Wholesale Customers. The SFPUC shall allocate water to each Wholesale Customer, as specified in the list. The shortage allocations so established (known as Tier 2
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
3 21606945.9
allocations) may be transferred as provided in Section 2.5 of this Plan. If BAWSCA or all Wholesale Customers do not provide the SFPUC with individual allocations, the SFPUC may make a final allocation decision after first meeting and discussing allocations with BAWSCA and the Wholesale Customers.
The Tier 2 Plan methodology adopted by the Wholesale Customers utilizes the rolling average of each individual Wholesale Customer’s purchases from the SFPUC during the three immediately preceding Supply Years. The SFPUC agrees to provide BAWSCA by November 1 of each year a list showing the amount of water purchased by each Wholesale Customer during the immediately preceding Supply Year.
The list will be prepared using Customer Service Bureau report MGT440 (or comparable official record in use at the time), adjusted as required for any reporting errors or omissions, and will be transmitted by the SFPUC General Manager or his designee.
2.3. Limited Applicability of Plan to System Wide Shortages Greater Than Twenty Percent. The Tier 1 allocations of water between the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers collectively, provided for in Section 2.1, apply only to shortages of 20 percent or less. The SFPUC and Wholesale Customers recognize the possibility of a drought occurring which could create system-wide shortages greater than 20 percent despite actions taken by the SFPUC aimed at reducing the probability and severity of water shortages in the SFPUC service area. If the SFPUC determines that a system wide water shortage greater than 20 percent exists, the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers agree to meet within 10 days and discuss whether a change is required to the allocation set forth in Section 2.1 in order to mitigate undue hardships that might otherwise be experienced by individual Wholesale Customers or Retail Customers. Following these discussions, the Tier 1 water allocations set forth in Section 2.1 of this Plan, or a modified version thereof, may be adopted by mutual written consent of the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers. If the SFPUC and Wholesale Customers meet and cannot agree on an appropriate Tier 1 allocation within 30 days of the SFPUC’s determination of water shortage greater than 20 percent, then (1) the provisions of Section 3.11(C) of the Agreement will apply, unless (2) all of the Wholesale Customers direct in writing that a Tier 2 allocation methodology agreed to by them be used to apportion the water to be made available to the Wholesale Customers collectively, in lieu of the provisions of Section 3.11(C).
The provisions of this Plan relating to transfers (in Section 2.5), banking (in Section 3), and excess use charges (in Section 4) shall continue to apply during system-wide shortages greater than 20 percent.
2.4. Monthly Water Budgets. Within 10 days after adopting a declaration of water shortage emergency, the SFPUC will determine the amount of Tier 1 water allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively pursuant to Section 2.1. The SFPUC General Manager, using the Tier 2 allocation percentages shown on the list delivered by BAWSCA pursuant to Section 2.2, will calculate each Wholesale Customer’s individual annual Tier 2 allocation. The SFPUC General Manager, or his designee, will then provide each Wholesale Customer with a proposed schedule of monthly water budgets based on the pattern of monthly water purchases during the Supply Year immediately preceding the declaration of shortage (the “Default Schedule”). Each Wholesale Customer may, within two weeks of receiving its Default Schedule, provide the SFPUC with an alternative monthly water budget that reschedules its annual Tier 2 shortage allocation over the course of the succeeding Supply Year. If a Wholesale Customer does not deliver an alternative monthly water budget to the SFPUC within two weeks of its receipt of the Default Schedule, then its monthly budget for the ensuing Supply Year shall be the Default Schedule proposed by the SFPUC.
Monthly Wholesale Customer water budgets will be derived from annual Tier 2 allocations for purposes of accounting for excess use. Monthly Wholesale Customer water budgets shall be adjusted during the year to account for transfers of shortage allocation under Section 2.5 and transfers of banked water under Section 3.4.
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
4 21606945.9
2.5. Transfers of Shortage Allocations. Voluntary transfers of shortage allocations between the SFPUC and any Wholesale Customers, and between any Wholesale Customers, will be permitted using the same procedure as that for transfers of banked water set forth in Section 3.4. The SFPUC and BAWSCA shall be notified of each transfer. Transfers of shortage allocations shall be deemed to be an emergency transfer and shall become effective on the third business day after notice of the transfer has been delivered to the SFPUC. Transfers of shortage allocations shall be in compliance with Section 3.05 of the Agreement. The transferring parties will meet with the SFPUC, if requested, to discuss any effect the transfer may have on its operations.
SECTION 3. SHORTAGE WATER BANKING
3.1. Water Bank Accounts. The SFPUC shall create a water bank account for itself and each Wholesale Customer during shortages in conjunction with its resale customer billing process. Bank accounts will account for amounts of water that are either saved or used in excess of the shortage allocation for each agency; the accounts are not used for tracking billings and payments. When a shortage period is in effect (as defined in Section 1.4), the following provisions for bank credits, debits, and transfers shall be in force. A statement of bank balance for each Wholesale Customer will be included with the SFPUC’s monthly water bills.
3.2. Bank Account Credits. Each month, monthly purchases will be compared to the monthly budget for that month. Any unused shortage allocation by an agency will be credited to that agency’s water bank account. Credits will accumulate during the entire shortage period, subject to potential restrictions imposed pursuant to Section 3.2.1. Credits remaining at the end of the shortage period will be zeroed out; no financial or other credit shall be granted for banked water.
3.2.1. Maximum Balances. The SFPUC may suspend the prospective accumulation of credits in all accounts. Alternatively, the SFPUC may impose a ceiling on further accumulation of credits in water bank balances based on a uniform ratio of the bank balance to the annual water allocation. In making a decision to suspend the prospective accumulation of water bank credits, the SFPUC shall consider the available water supply as set forth in Section 1.1 of this Plan and other reasonable, relevant factors.
3.3. Account Debits. Each month, monthly purchases will be compared to the budget for that month.
Purchases in excess of monthly budgets will be debited against an agency’s water bank account. Bank debits remaining at the end of the fiscal year will be subject to excess use charges (see Section 4).
3.4. Transfers of Banked Water. In addition to the transfers of shortage allocations provided for in Section 2.5, voluntary transfers of banked water will also be permitted between the SFPUC and any Wholesale Customer, and among the Wholesale Customers. The volume of transferred water will be credited to the transferee’s water bank account and debited against the transferor’s water bank account.
The transferring parties must notify the SFPUC and BAWSCA of each transfer in writing (so that adjustments can be made to bank accounts), and will meet with the SFPUC, if requested, to discuss any affect the transfer may have on SFPUC operations. Transfers of banked water shall be deemed to be an emergency transfer and shall become effective on the third business day after notice of the transfer has been delivered to the SFPUC. If the SFPUC incurs extraordinary costs in implementing transfers, it will give written notice to the transferring parties within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice of the transfer. Extraordinary costs means additional costs directly attributable to accommodating transfers and which are not incurred in non-drought years nor simply as a result of the shortage condition itself.
Extraordinary costs shall be calculated in accordance with the procedures in the Agreement and shall be subject to the disclosure and auditing requirements in the Agreement. In the case of transfers between Wholesale Customers, such extraordinary costs
shall be considered to be expenses chargeable solely to individual Wholesale Customers and shall be borne equally by the parties to the transfer. In the case of
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
5 21606945.9
transfers between the SFPUC and a Wholesale Customer, the SFPUC’s share of any extraordinary transfer costs shall not be added to the Wholesale Revenue Requirement.
3.4.1. Transfer Limitations. The agency transferring banked water will be allowed to transfer no more than the accumulated balance in its bank. Transfers of estimated prospective banked credits and the “overdrafting” of accounts shall not be permitted. The price of transfer water originally derived from the SFPUC system is to be determined by the transferring parties and is not specified herein. Transfers of banked water shall be in compliance with Section 3.05 of the Agreement.
SECTION 4. WHOLESALE EXCESS USE CHARGES
4.1. Amount of Excess Use Charges. Monthly excess use charges shall be determined by the SFPUC at the time of the declared water shortage consistent with the calendar in Section 6 and in accordance with Section 6.03 of the Agreement. The excess use charges will be in the form of multipliers applied to the rate in effect at the time the excess use occurs. The same excess use charge multipliers shall apply to the Wholesale Customers and all Retail Customers. The excess use charge multipliers apply only to the charges for water delivered at the rate in effect at the time the excess use occurred.
4.2 Monitoring Suburban Water Use. During periods of voluntary rationing, water usage greater than a customer’s allocation (as determined in Section 2) will be indicated on each SFPUC monthly water bill.
During periods of mandatory rationing, monthly and cumulative water usage greater than a Wholesale Customer’s shortage allocation and the associated excess use charges will be indicated on each SFPUC monthly water bill.
4.3. Suburban Excess Use Charge Payments. An annual reconciliation will be made of monthly excess use charges according to the calendar in Section 6. Annual excess use charges will be calculated by comparing total annual purchases for each Wholesale Customer with its annual shortage allocation (as adjusted for transfers of shortage allocations and banked water, if any). Excess use charge payments by those Wholesale Customers with net excess use will be paid according to the calendar in Section 6. The SFPUC may dedicate excess use charges paid by Wholesale Customers toward the purchase of water from the State Drought Water Bank or other willing sellers in order to provide additional water to the Wholesale Customers. Excess use charges paid by the Wholesale Customers constitute Wholesale Customer revenue and shall be included within the SFPUC's annual Wholesale Revenue Requirement calculation.
4.4. Tier 1 Family Plan. During periods of mandatory rationing, the SFPUC will not assess excess use charges on any of the Wholesale Customers if the Wholesale Customers’ collective cumulative purchases over the course of the Supply Year are less than the Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocation, as set forth in Section 2.1. If the Wholesale Customers’ collective cumulative purchases exceed the Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocation, the SFPUC shall assess excess use charges on each individual Wholesale Customer that exceeded its individual Tier 2 allocation (established in accordance with Section 2.2) over the course of the Supply Year in proportion to each individual Wholesale Customer’s share of the collective Wholesale Customers’ purchases that exceeded the Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocation.
SECTION 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING WATER SHORTAGE
ALLOCATION PLAN
5.1. Construction of Terms. This Plan is for the sole benefit of the parties and shall not be construed as granting rights to any person other than the parties or imposing obligations on a party to any person other than another party.
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
6 21606945.9
5.2. Governing Law. This Plan is made under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
5.3. Effect on Agreement. This Plan describes the method for allocating water between the SFPUC and the collective Wholesale Customers during system-wide water shortages of 20 percent or less. This Plan also provides for the SFPUC to allocate water among the Wholesale Customers in accordance with directions provided by the Wholesale Customers through BAWSCA under Section 2.2, and to implement a program by which such allocations may be voluntarily transferred among the Wholesale Customers.
The provisions of this Plan are intended to implement Section 3.11(C) of the Agreement and do not affect, change or modify any other section, term or condition of the Agreement.
5.4. Inapplicability of Plan to Allocation of SFPUC System Water During Non-Shortage Periods.
The SFPUC’s agreement in this Plan to a respective share of SFPUC system water during years of shortage shall not be construed to provide a basis for the allocation of water between the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers when no water shortage emergency exists.
5.5. Termination. This Plan shall expire at the end of the Term of the Agreement... The SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers can mutually agree to revise or terminate this Plan prior to that date due to changes in the water delivery capability of the SFPUC system, the acquisition of new water supplies, and other factors affecting the availability of water from the SFPUC system during times of shortage.
SECTION 5. ALLOCATION CALENDAR
6.1. Annual Schedule. The annual schedule for the shortage allocation process is shown below. This schedule may be changed by the SFPUC to facilitate implementation.
6.1.1 In All Years Target Dates
1. SFPUC delivers list of annual purchases by each Wholesale Customer during the immediately preceding Supply Year
November 1
2. SFPUC meets with the Wholesale Customers and presents water supply forecast for the following Supply Year
February
3. SFPUC issues initial estimate of available water supply February 1
4. SFPUC announces potential first year of drought (if applicable) February 1
5. SFPUC and Wholesale Customers meet upon request to exchange information concerning water availability and projected system- wide purchases
February 1-May 31
6. SFPUC issues revised estimate of available water supply, and confirms continued potential shortage conditions, if applicable March 1
7. SFPUC issues final estimate of available water supply April 15 th or sooner if adequate
snow course measurement data
is available to form a robust
estimate on available water
supply for the coming year.
8. SFPUC determines amount of water available to Wholesale Customers collectively
April 15
th or sooner if adequate
snow course measurement data
is available to form a robust
estimate on available water
Redline Comparing 2021 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement and 2025 Proposed Amendments
7 21606945.9
supply for the coming year.
In Drought Years Target Dates
9. SFPUC formally declares the existence of water shortage emergency (or end of water shortage emergency, if applicable) under Water Code Sections 350 et. seq.
April 15-30
10. SFPUC declares the need for a voluntary or mandatory response April 15-30
11. BAWSCA submits calculation to SFPUC of individual Wholesale Customers’ percentage shares of water allocated to Wholesale Customers collectively
April 15- 30
12. SFPUC determines individual shortage allocations, based on BAWSCA’s submittal of individual agency percentage shares to SFPUC, and monthly water budgets (Default Schedule)
April 25—M ay 10
13. Wholesale Customers submit alternative monthly water budgets (optional)
May 8-May 24
14. Final drought shortage allocations are issued for the Supply Year beginning July 1 through June 30
June 1
15. Monthly water budgets become effective July 1
16. Excess use charges indicated on monthly Suburban bills August 1 (of the beginning year) through June 30 (of the
succeeding year)
17. Excess use charges paid by Wholesale Customers for prior year August of the succeeding year
1 21645394.9
3.07. Restrictions on Purchases of Water from Others; Minimum Annual Purchases A. Each Wholesale Customer (except for Alameda County Water District and the cities of Milpitas,
Mountain View and Sunnyvale) agrees that it will not contract for, purchase or receive, with or without compensation, directly or indirectly, from any person, corporation, governmental agency or other entity, any water for delivery or use within its service area without the prior written consent of San Francisco.
B.
The prohibition in subsection A does not apply to:
1. recycled
water;
2. water necessary on an emergency and temporary basis, provided that the Wholesale
Customer promptly gives San Francisco notice of the nature of the emergency, the amount of water that has been or is to be purchased, and the expected duration of the emergency; or
3. water in excess of a Wholesale Customer’s Individual Supply Guarantee.
C.
Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities. Alameda County Water District and the cities of Milpitas, Mountain View and Sunnyvale may purchase water from sources other than San Francisco, provided that San Francisco shall require that each purchase a minimum annual quantity of water from San Francisco. These Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities are set out in Attachment E and shall also be included in the Individual Water Sales Contracts between San Francisco and each of these four Wholesale Customers (collectively referred to as the Original Minimum Purchase Customers). Pursuant to Section 3.04, certain Wholesale Customers may also be required to purchase Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities, set out in Attachment E-1, from San Francisco. Attachment E will be updated pursuant to Section 3.04 to reflect any reduction in existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities and any addition of new Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities when Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities expire and are removed from Attachment E-1; Individual Water Sales Contracts between San Francisco and any Wholesale Customers who are participants in a transfer under Section 3.04 will similarly be amended, as necessary.
1. Annual Notice. After the end of each fiscal year, the SFPUC will send a written notice to each Wholesale Customer with a Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, or a Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity with a copy to BAWSCA. The notice will include:
2 21645394.9
(a) the quantity of water
delivered to each of those Wholesale Customers individually and all of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers colle
ctively during the previous fiscal year;
(b) each Wh
olesale Customer’s individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Ann
ual Purchase Quantity (as adjusted for a Rebound Year,
if applicab
le, under Section 3.07.C.2);
(c) whether or not each
Wholesale Customer met its individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Ann
ual Purchase Quantity (as adjusted for a
Rebound Year, if applica
ble);
(d) whether or not the Original Minimum
Purchase Customers collectively purchased a
volume of water from Sa
n Francisco that is equal to or greater than the sum of their four Minimu
m Annual Purchase Quantities (as adjusted for a Rebound Year, if applicable); (e) any Imputed Sales charged to th
e Wholesale Customers; and
(f) the status of any Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities of the Wholesale Customers.
2. Waiver and Rebound Year. The minimum annual purchase requirements set out in Attachments E and E-1 will be waived during a Drought or other period of water shortage if the water San Francisco makes available to these Wholesale Customers is less than their Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities, and may be waived during a state of emergency declared by the Governor of California that impacts water supply use or deliveries from the Regional Water System. Once the waiver is no longer in effect, each of the minimum annual purchase requirements set out in Attachments E and E-1 shall be temporarily set, for one full fiscal year (referred to as the Rebound Year), to the midpoint between (1) the Wholesale Customer’s actual San Francisco purchases for the final year in which the waiver was in effect, up to a maximum of the Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, and (2) the Wholesale Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity or Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity set out in Attachment E or Attachment E-1, as applicable. Any fiscal year in which a Wholesale Customer meets its Rebound Year-adjusted Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, but not its standard Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, will not count as a fiscal year in which the Wholesale Customer has met or exceeded its Temporary Modified Minimum Purchase Quantity for the purposes of Section 3.04.C(4)(a).
D.
Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity Reset. As shown on Attachment E, in Fiscal
3 21645394.9
Year 2025-26, the Parties reset the t
hen-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities of the
Original Minimum Purchase Customers to 80% of the average San Francisco purchases of each Customer over the four most recent non-drought years preceding Fiscal Year 2024-25, effective for Fiscal Year 2024-25. If the Parties extend the Term of this Agreement beyond June 30, 2034 pursuant to Section 2.02, the Parties will review the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities of the Original Minimum Purchase Customers again ten years after the Fiscal Year 2025-26 reset. If the Original Minimum Purchase Customers, or San Francisco, want to propose a reset of the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities for Fiscal Year 2035-36, they will provide written notice on or before June 30, 2034. The Parties will meet and confer promptly to evaluate written reset proposals. By November 30, 2035, if the Parties have come to an agreement, the SFPUC will calculate the revised Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities based on the agreed upon methodology and provide written notice to the Original Minimum Purchase Customers and BAWSCA. The Original Minimum Purchase Customers will have at least 15 business days to review and meet and confer with the SFPUC with any questions or concerns before the revised quantities are finalized. If the Parties are unable to come to an agreement, the then-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities will remain unchanged. Any changes to the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities under this Section
3.07.D will be reflected in a revised Attachment E approved with the written concurrence of San Francisco and BAWSCA in accordance with Section 2.03.C. The Parties intend to include a continuing, periodic review of the Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities on a ten-year schedule in the successor to this Agreement.
E.
Collective Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities Considered Before Application of Imputed Sales. Imputed Sales will not apply to any of the individual Original Minimum Purchase Customers in a particular fiscal year if those Customers have collectively purchased a volume of water from San Francisco that is equal to or greater than the sum of their four Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities shown in Attachment E (or adjusted for a Rebound Year pursuant to Section
3.07.C.2, if applicable). If the Original Minimum Purchase Customers do not collectively purchase that sum, any Original Minimum Purchase Customer that has not met its standard or Rebound Year-adjusted Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity will be responsible for Imputed Sales proportional to its share of the difference between that sum and the Original Minimum Purchase Customers’ total purchases from San Francisco. Examples of this calculation are contained in Attachment E-3.
21428629.4
Proposed 2025 Amended and Restated Water Supply Agreement: Sections 2.03, 3.09, and
9.07, and Attachment A Definitions.
2.03. Amendments .
C. Amendments to Attachments. The following attachments may be amended with the written concurrence of San Francisco and BAWSCA on behalf of the Wholesale Customers:
Attachment Name
C Individual Supply Guarantees (amendments reflecting Section
3.04 transfers only)
E Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (amendments reflecting Section 3.04 transfers and Section 3.07 resets only)
E-1
Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities
G
Water Quality Notification and Communications Plan
(as may be amended)
J Water Use Measurement and Tabulation
L-1
Identification of WSIP Projects as Regional/Retail
N-1
Balancing Account/Rate Setting Calculation Table
N-2
Wholesale Revenue Requirement Schedules
N-3
Schedule of Projected Water Sales, Wholesale Revenue
Requirement and Wholesale Rates
P Management Representation Letter
R Classification of Existing System Assets (subject to Section
5.11)
Amendments to these attachments shall be approved on behalf of San Francisco by the Commission and on behalf of BAWSCA by its Board of Directors, unless the Commission by resolution delegates such authority to the General Manager of the SFPUC or the Board of Directors by resolution delegates such authority to the General Manager/CEO of BAWSCA.
21428629.4
3.09. Completion of WSIP
San Francisco will comp
lete construction of the physical facilities in the WSIP by June 30, 2032. The SFPUC agrees to provide for full public review and comment by local and state interests of any proposed changes that delay previously adopted project completion dates or that delete projects. The SFPUC shall meet and consult with BAWSCA before proposing to the Commission any changes in the scope of WSIP projects which reduce their capacity or ability to achieve adopted Level of Service Goals and Objectives. The SFPUC retains discretion to determine whether to approve the physical facilities in the WSIP until after it completes the CEQA process as set forth in Section 4.07.
9.07. City of Brisbane, Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District, Town of Hillsborough
A. The parties acknowledge that San Francisco has heretofore provided certain quantities of
water to the City of Brisbane (“Brisbane”), Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District (“Guadalupe”) and the Town of Hillsborough (“Hillsborough”) at specified rates or without charge pursuant to obligations arising out of agreements between the predecessors of San Francisco and these parties, which agreements are referred to in judicial orders, resolutions of the SFPUC and/or the 1960 contracts between San Francisco and Brisbane, Guadalupe and Hillsborough. The parties intend to continue those arrangements and accordingly agree as follows:
1. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to alter, amend or modify the terms of SFPUC Resolution No
. 74-0053 or the indenture of July 18, 1908 between the Guadalupe Development Company and the Spring Valley Water Company.
2. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to alter, amend or modify the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and Judgment dated May 25, 1961 in that certain action entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Town of Hillsborough in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Marin, No. 23282, as modified by the Satisfaction of Judgment filed October 23, 1961 and the Compromise and Release between Hillsborough and San Francisco dated August 22, 1961. The rights and obligations of Hillsborough under these documents shall continue as therein set forth.
3. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to affect or prejudice any claims, rights or re
medies of Guadalupe or of Crocker Estate Company, a corporation, or of Crocker
21428629.4
Land Company, a corporation, or of San Francisco, or of their successors and assigns, respectively, with respect to or arising out of that certain deed dated May 22, 1884, from Charles Crocker to Spring Valley Water Works, a corporation, recorded on May 24, 1884, in Book 37 of Deeds at page 356, Records of San Mateo County, California, as amended by that certain Deed of Exchange of Easements in Real Property and Agreement for Trade in Connection Therewith, dated July 29, 1954, recorded on August 4, 1954, in Book 2628, at page 298, Official Records of said San Mateo County, or with respect to or arising out of that certain action involving the validity or enforceability of certain provisions of said deed entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Crocker Estate Company, in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Marin, No. 23281.
Attachment A - Definitions
“Imputed Sales” apply when a Wholesale Customer does not meet the minimum annual purchase requirements of Section 3.07.C, as shown on Attachment E and Attachment E-1, except in fiscal years in which a waiver of these requirements is in effect. Imputed Sales are calculated as the difference between (1) a Wholesale Customer’s metered water purchases during a fiscal year, from July 1 to June 30, and (2) the larger of (a) or (b) as follows: (a) the Wholesale Customer’s Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, as specified in Attachment E and may be adjusted pursuant to Section 3.07.C.2, or (b) the Wholesale Customer’s Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, as specified in Attachment E-1 and may be adjusted pursuant to Section 3.07.C.2. If a Wholesale Customer has more than one Temporary Modified Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity, the largest quantity is used for calculating Imputed Sales. Imputed Sales are considered wholesale water usage for the purposes of calculating the Proportional Annual Use, and any fees charged for Imputed Sales are considered wholesale revenues.
“Level of Service Goals and Objectives” refers to the “Phased WSIP Goals and Objectives” adopted by the Commission in Resolution No. 08-0200 dated October 30, 2008 as part of the approval of the WSIP, as updated and expanded by the "2023 Amended and Updated Water Enterprise Level of Service Goals and Objectives," adopted by the Commission in Resolution No. 23-0210 dated November 28, 2023, and any amendments that may be adopted by the Commission.
21464591.6
ATTACHMENT E
MINIMUM ANNUAL PURCHASE QUANTITIES
(Section 3.07.C)
AGENCY MINIMUM ANNUAL PURCHASE QUANTITY
(IN MGD)1
Alameda County Water District 6.682
City of Milpitas 4.371
City of Mountain View 6.047
City of Sunnyvale 7.412
1 In Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26, the then-existing Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities for Alameda County Water District and the Cities of Milpitas, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale were reset to 80% of each of those four customers’ average San Francisco purchases over the four non-drought years preceding FY 2024-25 (FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20, and FY 2020-21), effective FY 2024-25. Prior to this reset, from the effective date of this Agreement (July 1, 2009) through FY 2023-24, those four customers had the following Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities:
1. Alameda County Water District: 7.648 MGD
2. City of Milpitas: 5.341 MGD
3. City of Mountai n View: 8.930 MGD
4. City of Sunnyvale: 8.930 MGD
21464584.11
ATTACHMENT E-3
21464584.11
ATTACHMENT E-3
Illustrations of Imputed Sales Considering Collective Regional Water System Use by Original Minimum Purchase Customers Compared to Sum of Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities Pursuant to Section 3.07.E
Scenario 1: Collective Purchases Equal to or Greater Than Sum of MAPQs1 (No Imputed Sales)2 Line
# Wholesale Customer
A B C D
E = (D[LINE #]
/ D5) × (B5 -
A5)
MAPQ
RWS3
Use
(mgd)
RWS
Over
MAPQ
(mgd)
RWS
Under
MAPQ
(mgd)
Proportion of
Use Under
Total MAPQ
(mgd)
1 Alameda County Water District 6.682 7.682 1.00 N/A
2 City of Milpitas 4.371 3.871 -0.50 N/A
3 City of Mountain View 6.047 5.047 -1.00 N/A
4 City of Sunnyvale 7.412 7.912 0.50 N/A
5 Total 24.512 24.512 1.50 -1.50 N/A
Scenario 2: Collective Purchases Less Than Sum of MAPQs (by 1.0 mgd) (Imputed Sales)4 Line
# Wholesale Customer
A B C D
E = (D[LINE #]
/ D5) × (B5 -
A5)
MAPQ
RWS
Use
(mgd)
RWS
Over
MAPQ
(mgd)
RWS
Under
MAPQ
(mgd)
Proportion of
Use Under
Total MAPQ
(mgd)
1 Alameda County Water District 6.682 7.182 0.50 N/A
2 City of Milpitas 4.371 3.871 -0.50 -0.25
3 City of Mountain View 6.047 4.547 -1.50 -0.75
4 City of Sunnyvale 7.412 7.912 0.50 N/A
5 Total 24.512 23.512 1.00 -2.00 -1.0
1 Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity (MAPQ)
2 In Scenario 1, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers’ collective purchases from San Francisco in a particular fiscal year (Line 5B) are equal to the sum of their Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (Line 5A). Therefore, no Imputed Sales are applied to individual Original Minimum Purchase Customers that purchased less than their individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (in this scenario, Milpitas and Mountain View). 3 Regional Water System (RWS)
4 In Scenario 2, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers’ collective purchases from San Francisco in a particular fiscal year (Line 5B) are 1.0 mgd less than the sum of their Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (Line 5A).
Therefore, Imputed Sales are applied proportionally to any individual Original Minimum Purchase Customer that purchased less than its individual Minimum Annual Purchase Quantity (in this scenario, Milpitas and Mountain View), so that customer is responsible for its share of the difference between the sum of all Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (Line 5A) and the collective amount of RWS use (Line 5B). In this scenario, Mountain View is responsible for 75% and Milpitas is responsible for 25% of the 1.0 mgd difference between Line 5A and Line 5B.
21464584.11
Scenario 3: Collective Purchases Equal to or Greater Than Sum of MAPQs – with Rebound Year-Adjusted MAPQs (No Imputed Sales)5 Line # Wholesale Custome r
A B
C = A -
((A[LINE #] -
B[LINE #]) / 2) D E F
G = (F[LINE #] /
F5) × (D5 - C5)
MAPQ
RWS Use
in Waiver’s
Final Year
Rebound
Year-Adjusted
MAPQ
RWS Use
(mgd)
RWS Over
Rebound
Year-
Adjusted
MAPQ (mgd)
RWS Under
Rebound
Year-
Adjusted
MAPQ (mgd)
Proportion of
Use Under
Total Rebound
Year-Adjusted
MAPQ (mgd)
1 Alameda County Water District 6.682 5.682 6.182 7.512 1.33 N/A 2 City of Milpitas 4.371 3.371 3.871 3.591 -0.28 N/A 3 City of Mountain View 6.047 5. 047 5.547 4.847 -0.70 N/A 4 City of Sunnyvale 7.412 6.412 6.912 7.782 0.87 N/A 5 Total 24.512 20.512 22.5 12 23.732 2.20 -0.98 N/A
5 In Scenario 3, the Original Minimum Purchase Customers’ collective purchases from San Francisco in a particular fiscal year (Line 5D) are greater than the sum of their Rebound Year-adjusted Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities that are currently in effect pursuant to Section 3.07.C.2 (Line 5C). Therefore, no Imputed Sales are applied to individual Original Minimum Purchase Customers that purchased less than their individual Rebound Year-adjusted Minimum Annual Purchase Quantities (in this scenario, Milpitas and Mountain View).
1 21606945.9
ATT
ACHMENT H
WATER SHORTAGE ALLOCATION PLAN
This Water Shortage Allocation Plan (“Plan”), also known as the Tier 1 Shortage Plan, describes the method for allocating water between the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (“SFPUC”), on the one hand, and the Wholesale Customers collectively, on the other, during shortages caused by drought.
The Plan also implements a method for allocating water among the individual Wholesale Customers, known as the Tier 2 Drought Response Implementation Plan (“Tier 2 Plan”), which has separately been adopted by the Wholesale Customers and does not include the SFPUC. The Plan includes provisions for transfers, banking, and excess use charges. The Plan applies only when the SFPUC determines that a system-wide water shortage due to drought exists, and all references to “shortages” and “water shortages” are to be so understood. This Plan was initially adopted pursuant to Section 7.03(a) of the 1984 Settlement Agreement and Master Water Sales Contract and has been incorporated and updated to correspond to the terminology used in the 2009 Water Supply Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and Wholesale Customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County (“Agreement”), as amended and restated from time to time.
SECTION 1. SHORTAGE CONDITIONS
1.1. Projected Available SFPUC Water Supply. The SFPUC shall make an annual determination as to whether or not a shortage condition exists. The determination of projected available water supply shall consider, among other things, stored water, projected runoff, water acquired by the SFPUC from non- SFPUC sources, inactive storage, reservoir losses, allowance for carryover storage, and water bank balances, if any, described in Section 3.
1.2 Projected SFPUC Customer Purchases. The SFPUC will utilize purchase data, including volumes of water purchased by the Wholesale Customers and by Retail Customers (as those terms are used in the Agreement) in the year immediately prior to the drought, along with other available relevant information, as a basis for determining projected system-wide water purchases from the SFPUC for the upcoming Supply Year (defined as the period from July 1 through June 30).
1.3. Shortage Conditions. The SFPUC will compare the projected available water supply (Section 1.1) with projected system-wide water purchases (Section 1.2). A shortage condition exists if the SFPUC determines that the projected available water supply is less than projected system-wide water purchases in the upcoming Supply Year. When a shortage condition exists, SFPUC will determine whether voluntary or mandatory actions will be required to reduce purchases of SFPUC water to required levels.
1.3.1 Voluntary Response. If the SFPUC determines that voluntary actions will be sufficient to accomplish the necessary reduction in water use throughout its service area, the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers will make good faith efforts to reduce their water purchases to stay within their annual Tier 1 and Tier 2 allocations as applicable (see Section 2 of this Attachment H) and associated monthly water use budgets. The SFPUC will not impose excess use charges during periods of voluntary rationing, but may suspend the prospective accumulation of water bank credits, or impose a ceiling on further accumulation of bank credits, consistent with Section 3.2.1 of this Plan.
1.3.2 Mandatory Response. If the SFPUC determines that mandatory actions will be required to accomplish the necessary reduction in water use in the SFPUC service area, the SFPUC may implement excess use charges as set forth in Section 4 of this Plan.
1.4. Period of Shortage. A shortage period commences when the SFPUC determines that a water shortage exists, as set forth in a declaration of water shortage emergency issued by the SFPUC pursuant to
2 21606945.9
California Water Code Sections 350 et seq. Termination of the water shortage emergency will be declared by resolution of the SFPUC.
SECTION 2. SHORTAGE ALLOCATIONS
2.1. Annual Tier 1 Allocations between the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers. The annual water supply available during shortages will be allocated between the SFPUC and the collective Wholesale Customers as follows:
Level of System Wide
Reduction in Water Use
Required
Share of Available Water
SFPUC Share Wholesale Customers Share
5% or less
6% through 10%
11% through 15%
16% through 20%
35.5%
36.0%
37.0%
37.5%
64.5%
64.0%
63.0%
62.5%
This Plan refers to the SFPUC’s and Wholesale Customers’ respective shares of available water so established as the SFPUC’s and Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocations. The water allocated to the SFPUC shall correspond to the total allocation for all Retail Customers. In the event that the SFPUC share of the available water supply in the above table results in Retail Customers having a positive allocation (i.e., a supply of additional water rather than a required percentage reduction in water use), the SFPUC’s percentage share of the available water supply in the table shall be reduced to eliminate any positive allocation to Retail Customers, with a corresponding increase in the percentage share of the available water supply allocated to the Wholesale Customers. For any level of required reduction in system-wide water use during shortages, the SFPUC shall require Retail Customers to conserve a minimum of 5%, with any resulting reallocated supply credited to storage for inclusion in calculation of projected available water SFPUC water supply in a subsequent year (Section 1.1).
The parties agree to reevaluate the percentages of the available water supply allocated to Retail and Wholesale Customers by May 1, 2028.
2.2 Annual Tier 2 Allocations among the Wholesale Customers. The annual water supply allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively during system wide shortages of 20 percent or less (i.e., the Wholesale Customers’ Tier 1 allocation) will be apportioned among them based on a methodology, known as the Tier 2 Plan, that has been separately adopted by all of the Wholesale Customers, and not the SFPUC, as described in Section 3.11(C) of the Agreement. In any year for which the methodology must be applied, the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (“BAWSCA”) will calculate each Wholesale Customer’s individual percentage share of the amount of water allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively pursuant to Section 2.1. Following the declaration or reconfirmation of a water shortage emergency by the SFPUC, BAWSCA will deliver to the SFPUC General Manager a list, signed by the President of BAWSCA’s Board of Directors and its General Manager, showing each Wholesale Customer together with its percentage share and stating that the list has been prepared in accordance with the methodology adopted by the Wholesale Customers. The SFPUC shall allocate water to each Wholesale Customer, as specified in the list. The shortage allocations so established (known as Tier 2 allocations) may be transferred as provided in Section 2.5 of this Plan. If BAWSCA or all Wholesale Customers do not provide the SFPUC with individual allocations, the SFPUC may make a final allocation decision after first meeting and discussing allocations with BAWSCA and the Wholesale Customers.
3 21606945.9
The Tier 2 Plan methodology adopted by the Wholesale Customers utilizes the rolling average of each individual Wholesale Customer’s purchases from the SFPUC during the three immediately preceding Supply Years. The SFPUC agrees to provide BAWSCA by November 1 of each year a list showing the amount of water purchased by each Wholesale Customer during the immediately preceding Supply Year.
The list will be prepared using Customer Service Bureau report MGT440 (or comparable official record in use at the time), adjusted as required for any reporting errors or omissions, and will be transmitted by the SFPUC General Manager or his designee.
2.3. Limited Applicability of Plan to System Wide Shortages Greater Than Twenty Percent. The Tier 1 allocations of water between the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers collectively, provided for in Section 2.1, apply only to shortages of 20 percent or less. The SFPUC and Wholesale Customers recognize the possibility of a drought occurring which could create system-wide shortages greater than 20 percent despite actions taken by the SFPUC aimed at reducing the probability and severity of water shortages in the SFPUC service area. If the SFPUC determines that a system wide water shortage greater than 20 percent exists, the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers agree to meet within 10 days and discuss whether a change is required to the allocation set forth in Section 2.1 in order to mitigate undue hardships that might otherwise be experienced by individual Wholesale Customers or Retail Customers. Following these discussions, the Tier 1 allocations set forth in Section 2.1 of this Plan, or a modified version thereof, may be adopted by mutual written consent of the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers. If the SFPUC and Wholesale Customers meet and cannot agree on an appropriate Tier 1 allocation within 30 days of the SFPUC’s determination of water shortage greater than 20 percent, then (1) the provisions of Section
3.11(C) of the Agreement will apply, unless (2) all of the Wholesale Customers direct in writing that a Tier 2 allocation methodology agreed to by them be used to apportion the water to be made available to the Wholesale Customers collectively, in lieu of the provisions of Section 3.11(C).
The provisions of this Plan relating to transfers (in Section 2.5), banking (in Section 3), and excess use charges (in Section 4) shall continue to apply during system-wide shortages greater than 20 percent.
2.4. Monthly Water Budgets. Within 10 days after adopting a declaration of water shortage emergency, the SFPUC will determine the amount of Tier 1 water allocated to the Wholesale Customers collectively pursuant to Section 2.1. The SFPUC General Manager, using the Tier 2 allocation percentages shown on the list delivered by BAWSCA pursuant to Section 2.2, will calculate each Wholesale Customer’s individual annual Tier 2 allocation. The SFPUC General Manager, or his designee, will then provide each Wholesale Customer with a proposed schedule of monthly water budgets based on the pattern of monthly water purchases during the Supply Year immediately preceding the declaration of shortage (the “Default Schedule”). Each Wholesale Customer may, within two weeks of receiving its Default Schedule, provide the SFPUC with an alternative monthly water budget that reschedules its annual Tier 2 allocation over the course of the succeeding Supply Year. If a Wholesale Customer does not deliver an alternative monthly water budget to the SFPUC within two weeks of its receipt of the Default Schedule, then its monthly budget for the ensuing Supply Year shall be the Default Schedule proposed by the SFPUC.
Monthly Wholesale Customer water budgets will be derived from annual Tier 2 allocations for purposes of accounting for excess use. Monthly Wholesale Customer water budgets shall be adjusted during the year to account for transfers of shortage allocation under Section 2.5 and transfers of banked water under Section 3.4.
2.5. Transfers of Shortage Allocations. Voluntary transfers of shortage allocations between the SFPUC and any Wholesale Customers, and between any Wholesale Customers, will be permitted using the same procedure as that for transfers of banked water set forth in Section 3.4. The SFPUC and BAWSCA shall be notified of each transfer. Transfers of shortage allocations shall be deemed to be an emergency transfer and shall become effective on the third business day after notice of the transfer has been delivered to the SFPUC. Transfers of shortage allocations shall be in compliance with Section 3.05 of the
4 21606945.9
Agreement. The transferring parties will meet with the SFPUC, if requested, to discuss any effect the transfer may have on its operations.
SECTION 3. SHORTAGE WATER BANKING
3.1. Water Bank Accounts. The SFPUC shall create a water bank account for itself and each Wholesale Customer during shortages in conjunction with its resale customer billing process. Bank accounts will account for amounts of water that are either saved or used in excess of the shortage allocation for each agency; the accounts are not used for tracking billings and payments. When a shortage period is in effect (as defined in Section 1.4), the following provisions for bank credits, debits, and transfers shall be in force. A statement of bank balance for each Wholesale Customer will be included with the SFPUC’s monthly water bills.
3.2. Bank Account Credits. Each month, monthly purchases will be compared to the monthly budget for that month. Any unused shortage allocation by an agency will be credited to that agency’s water bank account. Credits will accumulate during the entire shortage period, subject to potential restrictions imposed pursuant to Section 3.2.1. Credits remaining at the end of the shortage period will be zeroed out; no financial or other credit shall be granted for banked water.
3.2.1. Maximum Balances. The SFPUC may suspend the prospective accumulation of credits in all accounts. Alternatively, the SFPUC may impose a ceiling on further accumulation of credits in water bank balances based on a uniform ratio of the bank balance to the annual water allocation. In making a decision to suspend the prospective accumulation of water bank credits, the SFPUC shall consider the available water supply as set forth in Section 1.1 of this Plan and other reasonable, relevant factors.
3.3. Account Debits. Each month, monthly purchases will be compared to the budget for that month.
Purchases in excess of monthly budgets will be debited against an agency’s water bank account. Bank debits remaining at the end of the fiscal year will be subject to excess use charges (see Section 4).
3.4. Transfers of Banked Water. In addition to the transfers of shortage allocations provided for in Section 2.5, voluntary transfers of banked water will also be permitted between the SFPUC and any Wholesale Customer, and among the Wholesale Customers. The volume of transferred water will be credited to the transferee’s water bank account and debited against the transferor’s water bank account.
The transferring parties must notify the SFPUC and BAWSCA of each transfer in writing (so that adjustments can be made to bank accounts), and will meet with the SFPUC, if requested, to discuss any affect the transfer may have on SFPUC operations. Transfers of banked water shall be deemed to be an emergency transfer and shall become effective on the third business day after notice of the transfer has been delivered to the SFPUC. If the SFPUC incurs extraordinary costs in implementing transfers, it will give written notice to the transferring parties within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice of the transfer. Extraordinary costs means additional costs directly attributable to accommodating transfers and which are not incurred in non-drought years nor simply as a result of the shortage condition itself.
Extraordinary costs shall be calculated in accordance with the procedures in the Agreement and shall be subject to the disclosure and auditing requirements in the Agreement. In the case of transfers between Wholesale Customers, such extraordinary costs shall be considered to be expenses chargeable solely to individual Wholesale Customers and shall be borne equally by the parties to the transfer. In the case of transfers between the SFPUC and a Wholesale Customer, the SFPUC’s share of any extraordinary transfer costs shall not be added to the Wholesale Revenue Requirement.
3.4.1. Transfer Limitations. The agency transferring banked water will be allowed to transfer no more than the accumulated balance in its bank. Transfers of estimated prospective banked credits and the “overdrafting” of accounts shall not be permitted. The price of transfer water originally derived from the SFPUC system is to be determined by the transferring parties and is not specified herein. Transfers of banked water shall be in compliance with Section 3.05 of the Agreement.