1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
136 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx safety codes, coordination of citywide disaster response efforts, and enforcement of State and federal hazardous materials regulations.52 The Fire Department has approximately 82 full time personnel 53 and operates four stations within its service area. As indicated in the previous FEIR, the nearest fire station to the site is Fire Station No. 1 located at 777 South Main Street, approximately 0.6 miles west of the site. The Fire Department’s response time goal for fire and emergency medical services is four minutes or less for all urban service areas. The site is located within the City’s urban service area.
Police services are provided by the City of Milpitas Police Department. As described in the previous FEIR, police services in the City, including the project area, are provided from one central station located at 1275 North Milpitas Boulevard, which is approximately 2.25 miles northwest of the project site. The Police Department has approximately 128 employees, including 94-sworn and 34 non-sworn personnel. Police response times are typically measured from the time a police dispatcher receives a call to the time a police officer arrives at the incident location. The Police Department’s response time goal for emergency calls is three minutes or less. 54
The project site is located within the Milpitas Unified School District boundaries,55 and the nearest library to the site is Santa Clara County Library District Milpitas Library located on 160 North Main Street, approximately 1.1 miles northwest of the site.
Parks, trails, and recreational facilities in the City are managed by the Recreation and Community Services Department and maintained by the Public Works Department. The City owns 34 public parks, which is a total of approximately 190 acres, that include amenities such as softball fields, tennis, basketball, handball, bocce ball, and volleyball courts, horseshoe pits, par courses, and barbecue areas. The previous FEIR indicated the nearest park was Creighton Park, approximately
0.5 miles. The nearest City-owned park is currently Bob McGuire Park, located at 791 Garden Street, approximately 785 feet south of the site.56,57
The City also owns six recreational facilities, including Alviso Adobe, Higuero Adobe, Milpitas Community Center, Barbara Lee Senior center, Sal Cracolice Recreational Facility, and Milpitas
52 City of Milpitas. About the Fire Department. Website: https://www.milpitas.gov/329/About-the-Fire-Department. Accessed May 7, 2025.
53 City of Milpitas Fire Department. Organizational Structure. Website:
https://www.milpitas.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3296/Fire-Organization-Chart-Fiscal-Year-23-24-pdf. Accessed May 7, 2025.
54 City of Milpitas Police Department. Crime and Incident Data: Response Times. Accessed May 7, 2025. https://www.milpitas.gov/1107/Crime-and-Incident-
Data#:~:text=Response%20Times&text=The%20City%20of%20Milpitas%20has%20committed%20to%20responding%2 0to,within%203%20minutes%20or%20less.
55 Milpitas Unified School District. District Boundary Map. Website: https://www.musd.org/district-boundary-map.html.
Accessed May 7, 2025.
56 City of Milpitas. Facilities. Website: https://www.milpitas.gov/Facilities?clear=False. Accessed May 8, 2025. 57 City of Milpitas. Parks, Trees & Landscape Maintenance. Website: https://www.milpitas.gov/635/Parks-Trees-Landscape- Maintenance. Accessed May 8, 2025.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 137
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Sports Center. The nearest recreational facility is Sal Cracolice Recreational Facility, which is located at Bob McGuire Park.
In addition, the City includes one regional trail, Coyote Creek Trail, and two City trails, Berryessa Creek Trail and Penitencia Creek Trail; these trails provide access to City parks and link neighborhoods with employment centers, shopping districts, schools, and transit facilities . The nearest trail is Berryessa Creek Trail, approximately 400 feet east of the site.
Discussion
a) Need for New or Altered Fire Protection Facilities
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to fire protection facilities and services would be less than significant. Given that the previously approved project would not permanently increase the existing residential population in the City, the previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project would not result in a long-term increase in the demand for public services or require construction of new governmental facilities. The previous FEIR indicated that the Fire Department would continue providing services to the project site and construction of a new or expanded fire station would not be required as a result of the previously approved project. As such, the previous FEIR concluded the previously approved project would not result in a significant impact on the physical environment due to the incremental increase in demand for fire protection and life safety services, and the potential increase in demand for services is not expected to adversely affect existing responses times to the site or within the City. Therefore, the impact was concluded as less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project does not include residential uses; as such, the proposed project would not result in the permanent increase in the population of residents. Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project would consist of a warehouse/office building which would add employees to the site, albeit with a slight increase of 33 employees (see Table 1). Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project would result in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection services due to on-site operations. However, as indicated in the previous FEIR, this type of project on this site would not result in the need for the construction of a new or expanded fire station. In addition, consistent with General Plan Action SA-4b, the City’s Public Works Department and Fire Department are required to review the project’s site plans to ensure that the proposed project facilitates adequate fire services, access, and fire prevention measures. As such, consistent with the previous FEIR, impacts related to fire protection facilities and services would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
138 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx b) Need for New or Altered Police Protection Facilities Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded that impacts related to police protection services would be less than significant. The previous FEIR indicated that the previously approved project would not permanently increase the existing residential population in the City, the project would not result in a long-term increase in the demand for public services or require construction of new Police Department facilities.
Development of the previously approved project would increase daytime and nighttime population on the project site and therefore incrementally increase demand for emergency police services to the project site. However, the previous FEIR concluded that the Police Department would continue to provide services to the project site and construction of new or expanded police facilities would not be required. As such, the impacts related to fire protection facilities and services were concluded to be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
As illustrated in Table 1 and described under the response to Impact XV(a), the proposed project would add approximately 363 employees to the site, a slight increase from the previously approved project’s expected 330 employees. Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services due to on-site operations. However, as indicated in the previous FEIR, this type of project on this site would not result in the need for the construction of a new or expanded fire station. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact related to police protection services and facilities that were not identified in the previous FEIR. c) Need for New or Altered School Facilities
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to school services and facilities would be less than significant. The previous FEIR indicated that, given the previously approved project would not permanently increase the population of residents in the City, the previously approved project would not result in a long-term increase in the demand for public services or require construction of new governmental facilities (including school facilities). The previous FEIR also concluded that, as a nonresidential development, the previously approved project would not create additional demand for school services. Therefore, it was concluded there would be a less than significant impact related to the need for new or altered school facilities.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Consistent with the previously approved project, the proposed project would include warehouse and office uses and no residences are proposed. As such, the proposed project would not create additional demand for school services or facilities. The proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 139
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx d) Parks
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to park services would be less than significant. It indicated that, given the previously approved project would not permanently increase the existing population of residents in the City, the project would not result in a long-term create additional demand for park services. Therefore, the previous FEIR concluded that construction and operation of the previously approved project would have a less than significant impact related to parks.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusions
Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project would include warehouse and office uses, and no residences are proposed as a part of the proposed project. As such, the proposed project would not create a significant demand for park and recreational facilities. Furthermore, an increase in the employee population, from the implementation of the proposed project, would not result in a substantial increase in usage of local parks or recreational facilities. Although future employees may use nearby parks, recreational facilities, or trails, employees would not result in the substantial physical alteration of these facilities. Therefore, the project’s impacts related to park and recreational facilities would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR. e) Other Public Facilities
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to other public facilities would be less than significant.
It indicated that, given the previously approved project would not permanently increase the existing residential population in the City, the project would not result in a long-term increase in the demand for public services or require construction of new governmental facilities (including library facilities).
The previous FEIR concluded that as a nonresidential development, the previously approved project would not create additional incremental demand for other public facilities, such as libraries. Therefore, the previous FEIR concluded that the construction and operation of the previously approved project would have a less than significant impact on library services or facilities (i.e., other public facilities).
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusions
Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project consists of a warehouse and office building. As such, the proposed project would not create a significant demand for other public facilities, such as libraries. Furthermore, an increase in the employee population from the implementation of the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in usage of other public facilities such as libraires. Although future employees may use nearby public facilities, employees would not result in the substantial physical alteration of these facilities. Therefore, similar to the previously proposed project, the proposed project would have less than significant impacts public facilities such as libraries and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
140 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.
Conclusion
The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to Public Services, as found in the previous FEIR. No new impacts are found, and no mitigation is required.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
Further environmental analysis is not required because:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been identified which results in a significant effect not discussed in the previous FEIR or an impact which is more severe than shown in the previous FEIR.
4. No new mitigation measures are necessary.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 141
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVI. Recreation
Would the project:
a) Would the project
increase the use of
existing
neighborhood and
regional parks or
other recreational
facilities such that
substantial physical
deterioration of the
facility would occur
or be accelerated?
No impact No No No None
b) Does the project
include recreational
facilities or require
the construction or
expansion of
recreational
facilities, which
might have an
adverse physical
effect on the
environment?
No impact No No No None
Existing Conditions
The City owns 34 public parks, totaling approximately 190 acres, as well as six recreational facilities and various trails, as described in Section 15, Public Services.
Note that in the previous FEIR, the City evaluated potential effects on parks under both the Recreation and Public Services sections, consistent with the CEQA Guidelines. While both sections reference parks, they apply different impact thresholds and evaluate distinct types of environmental effects. The Public Services section concluded that the project would not create a need for new or expanded public park facilities to maintain acceptable service levels, and therefore impacts were
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
142 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx determined to be less than significant. By contrast, the Recreation section evaluated whether the project would lead to physical deterioration of existing parks requiring the development of new recreational amenities as a direct environmental effect. Since the City found that the project would not increase park use to a level that would result in substantial wear or degradation of facilities, the EIR identified no impact under the Recreation threshold. Considered together, the findings provide a complete assessment of potential park-related impacts through both lenses.
Discussion
a, b) Effects of Increased Use of Parks and Effects from Provision of Parks or Recreational Facilities
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project would result in no impacts related to the increase in the use of existing parks or recreational facilities or construction/expansion of recreational facilities. It indicated that the previously approved project’s industrial use would not generate population growth that would result in an increase in the use existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project would not require the expansion of existing recreational facilities or construction of additional recreational facilities elsewhere. Therefore, the previous FEIR concluded that no impacts to parks or recreational facilities would occur as a result of the previously approved project.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project would construct a warehouse and office building and would not include residential uses. Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project’s employees could use nearby neighborhood parks, trails, and recreational facilities on weekdays. However, such increased use would be minimal and would not result in the substantial physical deterioration of the se facilities. Therefore, consistent with the previous FEIR, the proposed project would result in no impacts pertaining to the substantial physical deterioration of parks or other recreational facilities.
Given that the proposed project would not increase the population of residents within the City, it would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities to achieve the City’s adopted standard for park space acreage at 5 acres for every 1,000 residents. 58 The proposed warehouse and
office building does not include recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would result in no impact related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. As such, no impacts would occur and the proposed
58 The City’s General Plan Policy PROS-1.3 requires the City to “achieve and maintain a minimum overall citywide ratio of 5 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents outside of the Midtown Specific Plan Area and Transit Area Specific Plan Area. Within these Specific Plan Areas, achieve and maintain the parks standards and ratios specified in the specific plan, with an emphasis on publicly accessible spaces and facilities.” The project site is outside the aforementioned Specific Plan areas.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 143
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.
Conclusion
The proposed project would not result in any impacts related to Recreation, as found in the previous FEIR. No new impacts are found and no mitigation is required.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
Further environmental analysis is not required because:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been identified which results in a significant effect not discussed in the previous FEIR or an impact which is more severe than shown in the previous FEIR.
4. No new mitigation measures are necessary.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
144 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVII. Transportation
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a
program plan,
ordinance or policy
of the circulation
system, including
transit, roadway,
bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Would the project
conflict or be
inconsistent with
CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Significant
and
unavoidable
impact
No No No MM TRANS-1
c) Substantially
increase hazards
due to a geometric
design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or
dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses
(e.g., farm
equipment)?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
d) Result in
inadequate
emergency access?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 145
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx The following section is based on the information provided in the Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) (July 9, 2025), and the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (July 17, 2025) prepared for the proposed project by NV5 Engineers and Consultants. 59,60 Discussion
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Previous FEIR Conclusions
According to the previous FEIR, the project was expected to generate a total of approximately 3,303 new daily vehicle trips. However, the previous FEIR found that vehicle trips generated by the project would not cause conflicts with the relevant planning documents addressing the local and regional circulation system, including the City of Milpitas General Plan, the VTA’s planning documents, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Plan Bay Area 2040. The project was also expected to generate demand for bus and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) trips in the project vicinity. According to the previous FEIR, employees working on the project site who use BART may choose to walk or bike to the site or take the bus. As described in the previous FEIR, there is a continuous sidewalk connection and continuous bicycle lanes between the Milpitas BART station and the project site.
Additionally, bus stops are located on South Milpitas Boulevard at Ames Avenue (north of the intersection in the northbound direction, and south of Ames Avenue in the southbound direction).
Thus, the previous FEIR determined that there was adequate pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure and service in place to serve trips by these modes to and from the project site.
According to the previous FEIR, the project also did not propose any off-site infrastructure changes which would cause conflicts with programs, plans, policies, or ordinances addressing off -site transit, roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Based on this assessment, the previous FEIR found this impact to be less than significant with no mitigation required.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Vehicle Circulation
The proposed project would result in similar changes to circulation as those considered in the previous FEIR, including additional employee and truck traffic trips. Note that the proposed project includes four driveways whereas the previous project included five.
According to the LTA prepared for the proposed project, the proposed project would be expected to generate approximately 3,812 net new daily trips compared to the previously approved project’s 3,303 net new daily trips. This equates to an increase of 509 daily trips (Table 16). Note that while the
59 NV5 Engineers & Consultants. 2025. Local Transportation Analysis for 1000 Gibraltar Drive Delivery Center. July 9. 60 NV5 Engineers & Consultants. 2025 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis for 1000 Gibraltar Drive Delivery Center. July
17.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
146 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx proposed project’s daily trips are more than the previously approved project, the trips consist of significantly fewer truck trips due to the facility’s status as a last-mile delivery operation.
Table 16: Difference in Trip Generation from the Previously Approved Project Project AM Peak-hour Trips PM Peak-hour Trips Net New Daily Trips Previously Approved Project 348 88 3,303
Proposed Project 260 245 3,812
Difference -88 +157 +509
The LTA prepared for the proposed project analyzed 12 intersections in the vicinity of the project site to determine the proposed project’s effects on intersection delay, LOS and queueing. These intersections are listed below and fall under two categories; intersections designated under the Santa Clara VTA CMP and those that fall outside of the CMP network.
CMP Intersections:
• West Calaveras Boulevard and Abel Street
• E Calaveras Boulevard and Milpitas Boulevard
• Montague Expressway and South Milpitas Drive
• Great Mall Parkway/East Capitol Avenue and Montague Expressway • Montague Expressway and McCandless Drive/Trade Center Boulevard • Montague Expressway and South Main Street/Oakland Road
Non-CMP Intersections:
• South Milpitas Boulevard and Yosemite Drive
• South Milpitas Boulevard and Ames Avenue/Driveway 1
• South Milpitas Boulevard and Driveway 2
• South Milpitas Boulevard and Gibraltar Drive
• Gibraltar Drive and Driveway 3
• Gibraltar Drive and Driveway 4
Intersections were analyzed under Existing (2024), No-Build (2026), Build (2026), Future No Build (2040), Future Build (2040), and Future Build Conditions with Mitigation (2040) scenarios. According to the LTA prepared for the proposed project, traffic operations at intersections outside of the CMP operate acceptably under Existing conditions. All non-CMP intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better under both the 2026 and 2040 scenarios, with the exception of the South Milpitas Boulevard and Yosemite Drive intersection, which is projected to operate at LOS E under both 2040 No-Build and Build PM conditions. However, according to the analysis, since there is no change in critical delay or volume-to-capacity ratio between scenarios, the proposed project would not result in
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 147
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx an adverse effect at this location, and no mitigation is warranted per CMP guidelines. No additional improvements were recommended as part of the LTA, and its results indicated that the surrounding transportation network would adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed project.
As such, like the previously approved project, the proposed project would not be expected to conflict with relevant planning documents addressing the local and regional circulation system, including the City of Milpitas General Plan, the VTA’s planning documents, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Plan Bay Area 2040. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Bicycle Access and Circulation
Bicycle infrastructure exists in the immediate vicinity of the project site and remains as described under the previous FEIR. Bicycle facilities are categorized according to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) classification system, which defines the following four facility types:
• Class I–Shared-Use Path (Bike Path): A completely separated facility for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians, located off-street within its own right-of-way. • Class II–Bike Lane: A designated on-street lane for bicycle use, typically marked by striping and signage, located adjacent to vehicle travel lanes on priority corridors. • Class III–Bike Route: A shared roadway facility identified by signage and/or pavement markings, where bicyclists and motor vehicles operate within the same travel lane. • Class IV–Separated Bikeway (Protected Bike Lane or Cycle Track): An on-street bicycle facility physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by curbs, parked cars, posts, or other physical barriers.
There are no existing Class I or Class IV bike facilities within the vicinity of the project site. Class II bike facilities are available on Abel-Main Street south of Calaveras Boulevard, Great Mall Parkway, Capitol Avenue, South Milpitas Boulevard, Trade Zone Boulevard-McCandless Drive, and Yosemite Drive. There are also Class III bike facilities on Calaveras Boulevard and Abel Street north of Corning Avenue.
The proposed project does not include any modifications to existing bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site, consistent with the previously approved project, and would not include any off -site infrastructure changes that would conflict with existing or planned facilities. Additionally, as per General Plan Action CIR-4l which requires that developers promote multimodal transportation, the proposed project would provide 24 bicycle parking stalls adjacent to the proposed office space.
Bicycle circulation on-site would be provided via on-site pedestrian sidewalks, which would provide access to the Class II bike facilities on South Milpitas Boulevard. The proposed project would not cause conflicts with programs, plans, policies, or ordinances addressing bicycle facilities, as existing facilities would remain unchanged and unobstructed, and bicycle parking would be provided on- site to support bicycle transportation on-site. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
148 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Pedestrian Access and Circulation
Existing pedestrian access on the project site and directly surrounding areas has not changed significantly since certification of the previous FEIR. Like the previously approved project, pedestrian paths of travel would be demarcated throughout the project site and would connect to the existing sidewalk along South Milpitas Boulevard and Gibraltar Drive. Unlike the previously approved project , the proposed project would also construct crosswalks and curb ramps at the northern and western leg of the South Milpitas Boulevard and Ames Avenue intersection, as well as connect existing pedestrian pathways along South Milpitas Boulevard to its internal network of sidewalks to provide adequate pedestrian access to the project site. While these project components were not analyzed in the previous FEIR, their construction and implementation have been considered throughout this Addendum. Such improvements would serve to enhance pedestrian access and circulation and be consistent with applicable plans, ordinances or policies. As such, the proposed project would support access to local pedestrian infrastructure and would not cause conflicts with programs, plans, policies, or ordinances addressing pedestrian facilities. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Transit Facilities
As analyzed in the previous FEIR, the proposed project would generate demand for bus and BART trips. The nearest BART station is located approximately 0.57 mile south of the project site.
Additionally, there are bus stops servicing Alameda Contra-Costa Transit located on South Milpitas Boulevard at Ames Avenue (north of the intersection in the northbound direction, and south of Ames Avenue in the southbound direction), similar to the conditions considered in the previous FEIR. There are adequate pedestrian facilities available connecting the project site to these existing facilities, and the proposed project would not include any infrastructure that would obstruct or deny access to these existing facilities. As such, the proposed project would not cause conflicts with programs, plans, policies, or ordinances addressing transit facilities. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Previous FEIR Conclusions
To determine impacts related to VMT, the previous FEIR utilized procedures and metrics, and significance criteria consistent with the guidance provided by the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) (formerly the Office of Planning and Research [OPR]), the Santa Clara County VTA, and the City of Milpitas. According to the previous FEIR, the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory) sets forth guidance regarding metrics that may be calculated to evaluate VMT impacts from three types of land uses: residential, office/employment,
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 149
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx and retail. The project use type was employment, therefore regarding metrics, the advisory recommends that home-based work vehicle trips and home-based work vehicle trips per employee would be appropriate metrics for employment uses. This captures the employee commute trips to and from the employment site. In addition, the project’s effect on total regional VMT under cumulative conditions was also evaluated to assess whether regional total VMT would increase with the project.
This metric captures the effects of land use interactions and was considered a more wholistic evaluation of the previously approved project’s effect on regional VMT. According to the previous FEIR’s analysis, the three-county region encompassing Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateo Counties was included, to ensure that the full effect of project vehicle and truck trip lengths was captured.
The previous FEIR analyzed four scenarios regarding VMT:
• Existing Conditions: Represents current home-based work VMT per employee. • Existing with Project Conditions: Adds Project-generated VMT to Existing Conditions. • Cumulative Conditions: Represents expected home-based work VMT per employee in 2040 assuming various foreseeable land use developments in the study area and planned/funded roadway improvements. It adds 2040 traffic forecasts for the study area developed using the VTA Travel Demand Model.
• Cumulative with Project Conditions: Adds Project-generated VMT to Cumulative Conditions.
The previous FEIR analyzed VMT impacts against two metrics: Project Home-based Work VMT per Employee, and Total Boundary VMT. The previous FEIR determined that the previously approved project would have a significant impact on Home-based Work VMT per employee. This is because the Existing with Project VMT per employee of 16.19 did not meet the significance criteria of 15 percent below the Santa Clara countywide average of 14.31 and exceeded the threshold by 13 percent. The previous FEIR implemented MM TRANS-1, which requires a Travel Demand Management (TDM) program, a VMT Strategy Report, and project monitoring, to reduce impacts associated with Home- based Work VMT per employee. However, even with mitigation incorporated, the previously approved project was found to have a significant and unavoidable impact related to Home-based Work VMT per employee.
The previous FEIR determined that Total Boundary VMT61 for the three-county region would be 95,534,150 under the Existing with Project Scenario, as compared to the existing condition of 95,533,346. The previous FEIR, however, found that the project would have a less than significant impact on Total Boundary VMT, as even though the project was found to increase Total Boundary VMT within the three-county region, the effect is considered to be within the travel demand model
61 The previous FEIR indicates that Total Boundary VMT is a metric measure for the total VMT for all trips within the region expected to be affected by project trips. With the previous FEIR, this region was defined as Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateo counties.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
150 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx margin of error (0.0008 percent), and the Total Boundary VMT per service population is unchanged when calculated to two decimal places.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
According to the VMT Analysis prepared for the proposed project, the VMT for the delivery center can be viewed in three parts:
• On-site employees who commute to the site (Employee Commute VMT) • Private carrier commuting to the site; drivers must use their own vehicles to make deliveries (Private Carrier VMT)
• VMT associated with the delivery of goods and packages to the customer (Delivery VMT).
The proposed project’s VMT calculations can be seen in Table 16 below.
Table 17: Proposed Project VMT Calculations by Category Category VMT per Day VMT per Person per Day
Employee Commute VMT 5,960 16.42
Private Carrier Commute VMT 8,358 16.42
Delivery VMT -15,034 -0.79
Total -716 -0.52
The VMT Analysis estimated the VMT for delivery vehicles by finding the distance from the site to the furthest point within the delivery zone and multiplying by the number of vehicles bound for those zones. Additionally, some of the future customers that would be served by the proposed project are currently being served by an existing delivery center. The VMT Analysis accounted for the shifting of business from two other similar delivery centers, as well as an expanded service area. The Delivery VMT to and from the two existing delivery centers and the 46 zip codes they collectively serve is 49,185 per day. The estimated Delivery VMT to from the new delivery center in Milpitas (proposed project) and 118 zip codes (expanded service area) would be 34,151. Therefore, after locating a new delivery center closer to the user’s customers, as well as serving an expanded geographic area, there would be 15,034 fewer VMT per day than there is currently. This explains the negative value in Table
18. The City of Milpitas adopted a Transportation Analysis Policy in May 2021 that includes VMT Analysis for many discretionary development projects. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7, Thresholds of Significance, the City of Milpitas adopted the Santa Clara CMP baseline average and thresholds set at 85 percent of the citywide baseline averages for determining whether a project’s VMT would be significant. The citywide baseline average for VMT per employee is 17.54. The 85 percent (15 percent below) citywide baseline average is 14.91 VMT per employee per day. Projects
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 151
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx that exceed these thresholds may have a significant effect on the environment and may require project revisions and/or mitigation measures may be implemented to reduce the impact to less than significant.
Table 17 illustrates the VMT thresholds compared to the project’s VMT. As shown, the proposed project’s VMT is less than the targeted citywide VMT, resulting in a less than significant overall impact on VMT.
Table 18: VMT Significance
Project VMT per
Capita per Day
City of Milpitas
Threshold
Compared to
Threshold Impact Significance
Commuter Trips 16.42 14.91 10% higher Potentially Significant Delivery Trips -0.79 14.91 100% lower Less than Significant TOTAL -0.52 14.91 100% lower Less than Significant
While the overall VMT per day would be reduced, it is recognized that the proposed project’ s VMT per person per day would be 16.42, which is slightly higher than the previously approved project’s VMT per employee of 16.19.
The Employee Commute VMT and Private Carrier Commute VMT (shown as commuter trips in Table 17) for the proposed project is 16.42 per person per day. While, like the previously approved project, the number is higher than the citywide desired threshold of 14.91, it is still less than the citywide average VMT of 17.54. Nonetheless, consistent with the previous FEIR, the VMT Analysis recommends Transportation Demand Management Measures (TDMs) such as carpool matching programs, transit passes, and guaranteed rides home to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, like the previously approved project, the proposed project would be required to implement MM TRANS -1 to reduce potential impacts resulting from commuter VMT .According to the VMT Analysis, if 20 percent of daytime shift employees (6:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m. shifts) arrived by transit or carpooled, that would equate to a commuter VMT of 14.57 per day, which would be under the citywide significance level. With implementation of recommended TDM measures and MM TRANS-1, VMT impacts resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant, and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR determined that because the previously approved project would be subject to the City of Milpitas permitting process, which includes design review, there is no reason to expect that the site’s proposed driveway designs would not conform to City requirements. Based on this assessment,
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
152 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx the previous FEIR found that the previously approved project would have a less than significant impact with respect to hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, and no mitigation was required.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project would include four driveways (one less than the previously approved project) with widths ranging between 32 and 50 feet wide (whereas the previously approved project’s driveways ranged from 30 to 50 feet wide). Unlike the previously approved project, the proposed project would include upgrades to existing infrastructure along South Milpitas Boulevard, including operational upgrades to traffic signals at intersections of Ames Avenue and Gibraltar Avenue. The proposed improvements would also include City-standard sidewalk additions along South Milpitas Boulevard and Gibraltar Drive, as well as replacement of existing curb ramps along South Milpitas Boulevard and Gibraltar Drive. While these project components were not analyzed in the previous FEIR, their construction and implementation have been considered throughout this Addendum. Such improvements would serve to enhance pedestrian access and circulation, be consistent with applicable plans, ordinances, or policies, and would not be expected to result in an increased hazard.
On the contrary, these additional improvements would be designed for safe pedestrian and vehicular movement in the project vicinity. Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project plans would be subject to the City of Milpitas permitting process, which includes design review; therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the site driveway and roadway improvement designs, as well as off-site circulation improvements, would conform to City requirements. As such, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact with respect to hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses and would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Previous FEIR Conclusions
According to the previous FEIR, the project did not propose any off-site roadway network changes and therefore would not adversely affect emergency vehicle circulation on surrounding roadways. It was determined that the previously approved project’s two driveways on South Milpitas Boulevard and three on Gibraltar Drive, emergency vehicle access to all sides of the project building would be accommodated. Based on this assessment, the previous FEIR determined that the previously approved project would not impede emergency vehicle circulation along the project frontages or access to and from the project’s on-site buildings, and therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact on emergency access. No mitigation measures were required.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project would provide four driveways, with two along South Milpitas Boulevard, and two along Gibraltar Drive. All project driveways would provide an adequate turning radius for emergency vehicles and internal roadways on the project site would accommodate emergency vehicle circulation on all sides of the project building. Similar to the previously approved project, the proposed project
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 153
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx would not include any off-site roadway network changes and therefore would not adversely affect emergency vehicle circulation on surrounding roadways. Furthermore, while the proposed project would include road construction on South Milpitas Boulevard and Gibraltar Drive, it would be temporary and would not be expected to impede emergency access to the site or surrounding areas.
As such, like the previously approved project, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on emergency vehicle access and would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR Mitigation Measures
MM TRANS-1 The project applicant shall implement a travel demand management program for all employees with the goal of reducing the use of single-occupant vehicles for commuting. The measures most likely to be effective given the project’s location and expected use type include the following (measures are identified with the California Air Pollution Control Officers (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010) measure number and VMT reduction effectiveness range):
• Implement a commute trip reduction program with required implementation and monitoring (CAPCOA measure TRT-2, effectiveness range 4.2 percent–21.0 percent);
• Provide ride sharing programs (CAPCOA measure TRT-3, effectiveness range 1– 15 percent);
• Implement subsidized or discounted transit program (CAPCOA measure TRT-4, effectiveness range 0.3 percent–20 percent);
• Provide end-of-trip facilities (CAPCOA measure TRT-5, effectiveness based on effectiveness of measures TRT-2 and TRT-3);
• Implement commute trip reduction marketing (CAPCOA measure TRT-7, effectiveness range 0.8 percent–4.0 percent);
• Implement car-sharing program (CAPCOA measure TRT-9, effectiveness range
0.4 percent–0.7 percent);
• Restripe Green Bike lanes along property frontage; and • Bike locker subsidy.
(a) VMT Strategy Report
• Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit (Tenant to provide after 90 days of occupation), the project applicant (or project site operator) shall prepare a VMT Strategy Report that includes the following items:
• Identification of a baseline project home-based work VMT per employee estimate, which shall be determined using project-specific information derived from location- based data services such as StreetLight data which can estimate the trip generation, trip lengths, and VMT for the site. This shall be supplemented/verified by driveway counts, employee commute mode surveys, and employee residence
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
154 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx data which can provide a second VMT estimate to verify the StreetLight estimate.
Other methods may be approved by City staff if new data sources and methods become available by the time the project is occupied.
• Identification of the Santa Clara County regional home-based work VMT per employee, also derived from StreetLight data to provide an apples to apples comparison to the project-specific baseline.
• Identification of the percent reduction in VMT needed to achieve the target of 15 percent below the regional average.
• Identification of selected transportation demand management strategies per the above list, and others if appropriate.
• Demonstration of how the TDM strategies in the VMT Strategy Report would reduce the home-based work VMT per employee generated by the project to 15 percent below the countywide average home-based work VMT per employee. • After implementing the transportation demand management strategies selected in the VMT Strategy Report upon occupancy of the project, the effectiveness of these measures relative to the performance target noted previously must be monitored, as follows.
(b) Project Site VMT Monitoring Approach Monitoring
• The project shall be monitored by the City or by the project application/operator on an annual basis to determine the efficacy of the selected transportation demand management strategies in achieving the performance target of 15 percent below the regional average. The monitoring shall include project-generated VMT estimates compatible with the methodology used to estimate project baseline VMT so that performance comparisons can be made. The methodology for setting the baseline VMT and measuring the annual performance shall be defined in the VMT Strategy Report.
• An annual monitoring memorandum shall be submitted to City staff. If the project site is found not to be in compliance with the mitigation measure, the project must incorporate additional transportation demand management strategies to meet the performance target. The project applicant/operator may propose new strategies that develop over time to further reduce project-generated VMT if substantial evidence is provided to support the efficacy of the strategy. If a 15 percent VMT reduction is achieved for 3 consecutive years, the project will no longer need to provide annual reporting.
(c) Alternative Monitoring Approach
• The City of Milpitas may develop a citywide VMT monitoring program to allow global monitoring of City VMT, which may provide cost efficiencies and be a more effective way to track VMT generation by various uses in the City. The monitoring program could make use of emerging technologies including location-based
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 155
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx services on cell phones and in vehicles to track trip lengths, along with traditional technologies such as driveway traffic counts. If such a program is developed, the project could participate in the monitoring and demonstrate performance relative to the project’s VMT target.
Conclusion
As discussed above, all applicable mitigation measures from the previous FEIR would be required and implemented to ensure impacts are consistent with the previous FEIR.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
Further environmental analysis is not required because:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been identified which results in a significant effect not discussed in the previous FEIR or an impact which is more severe than shown in the previous FEIR.
4. No new mitigation measures are necessary.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
156 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:
a) Require or result in
the relocation or
construction of new
or expanded water,
wastewater
treatment or
stormwater
drainage, electric
power, natural gas,
or
telecommunications
facilities, the
construction or
relocation of which
could cause
significant
environmental
effects?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Have sufficient
water supplies
available to serve
the project and
reasonably
foreseeable future
development during
normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) Result in a
determination by
the wastewater
treatment provider
which serves or
may serve the
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 157
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
project that it has
adequate capacity
to serve the
project’s projected
demand in addition
to the provider’s
existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid
waste in excess of
State or local
standards, or in
excess of the
capacity of local
infrastructure, or
otherwise impair
the attainment of
solid waste
reduction goals?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
e) Comply with
federal, State, and
local management
and reduction
statutes and
regulations related
to solid waste?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) Construction of Expansion of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to the construction or expansion of new or expanded water, wastewater, stormwater, electric, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities would be less
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
158 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx than significant. The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project would be consistent with the site’s zoning and would not substantially increase demand for water compared to the previous on-site uses and would therefore not exceed the capacity of existing water treatment facilities. Similarly, the previously approved project would not require the construction of new water treatment facilities, or the expansion of existing facilities, other than those already planned as part of the City’s Water Master Plan. The previously approved project would include connections to the existing electrical and gas infrastructure in the vicinity of the project site and would not require any new infrastructure aside from project-specific tie-ins and lines to serve the previously approved project.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. The proposed project would be consistent with the site’s zoning and would result in a 3,476-square-foot reduction in total square footage as compared to the previously approved project. The similar proposed use type, along with the reduced square footage, would indicate that the proposed project’s utility demands would be substantially similar to that of the previously approved project. Accordingly, the proposed project’s demand for water, wastewater, or stormwater drainage utilities would be consistent with the previous FEIR and would not necessitate new or expanded facilities. Similarly, the proposed project would not result in increased demand for electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities beyond that considered in the previous FEIR. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
b) Water Supply
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to water supply would be less than significant. The City of Milpitas provides water to the project site. The project site is within the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) wholesale distribution area. The SFPUC supply is predominantly snowmelt from the Sierra Nevadas, delivered through the Hetch Hetchy aqueducts, but also includes treated water produced by SFPUC from its local watersheds and facilities in Alameda County.
Historically, the SFPUC has met demand in its service areas during all year types from its watersheds. The previously approved project was consistent with the site’s zoning. Accordingly, the previous FEIR concluded that the City would have sufficient water supply to support the previously approved project and its implementation would not require new or expanded entitlements for water supplies and, therefore, the impacts related to water supply would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. As previously mentioned, the proposed project would be consistent with the existing zoning and would represent a reduction in total building square footage as compared to the previously approved project. Due to the similar on-site use as compared to the previously approved project, the proposed project’s demand for water resources would be similar or slightly reduced as a result of reduced square footage. As
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 159
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous F EIR. c) Wastewater Capacity
Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to wastewater capacity would be less than significant.
The City of Milpitas owns and operates its municipal wastewater collection system containing 179 miles of gravity pipe and 5 miles of force main. The system also includes two pump stations: the Venus Station, which lifts wastewater from the low-lying Pines neighborhood, and the Main Sewer Pump Station, which pumps all City sewage through dual 2.5 mile force mains to the San Jos é/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) located in San José at 700 Los Esteros Road for treatment. The WPCP treats an average of 110 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd), about 65 percent of its 167 mgd capacity, which includes service to the project site. The previously approved project would generate domestic wastewater, treated by the WPCP. It was concluded that the previously approved project was consistent with the site’s zoning and the City has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project. Furthermore, the previous FEIR states, the City requires the completion of sewer system modeling to demonstrate adequate conveyance capacity based on the current discharge allocation. Therefore, wastewater generated from the proposed project would not cause the WPCP to violate any wastewater treatment requirements and this impact would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Like the previously approved project, and consistent with the analysis in the previous FEIR, the proposed project is consistent with the site’s zoning and General Plan designation. Furthermore, the proposed project would have a slightly smaller footprint than the previously approved project (see Table 1). The similar proposed use type, along with the reduced square footage and similar employee numbers (which drives wastewater production), would indicate that the proposed project’s utility demands would be substantially similar to that of the previously approved project. As a result, anticipated wastewater generation is expected to be comparable to or less than the volume generated under the previously approved project. Finally, as indicated by the previous FEIR, the proposed project would be required to complete sewer system modeling to demonstrate adequate conveyance capacity based on the current discharge allocation. Overall, no changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR in regard to wastewater. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR. d) Solid Waste Capacity
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to solid waste capacity would be less than significant.
Solid waste and recycling pickup and disposal in the City of Milpitas is provided by Republic Services.
The solid waste is disposed of at the Newby Island Landfill and recycling facility located
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
160 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx approximately 3.2 miles northwest of the project site on Dixon Landing Road . The Newby Island Landfill has a capacity of 57.5 million cubic yards and a remaining capacity of 21.2 million cubic yards, and can accept 4,000 tons per day. The previous FEIR concluded that the Newby Island Landfill has adequate capacity to serve the previously approved project. Furthermore, solid waste generated during the demolition, construction, and operational phase of the would be recycled to maximum extent feasible. As such, it was concluded that the previously approved project would be served by a landfill with sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s waste disposal needs and impacts associated with the disposition of solid waste would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Like the previously approved project, the proposed project is consistent with the site’s zoning and General Plan designation. Furthermore, the proposed project’s footprint would be slightly smaller than the previously approved project (see Table 1). The similar proposed use type, along with the reduced square footage, would indicate that the proposed project’s utility demands would be substantially similar to that of the previously approved project. As a result, anticipated solid waste generation is expected to be comparable to or less than the volume generated under the previously approved project. Finally, as indicated by the previous FEIR, the proposed project would be required to recycle solid waste generated during the demolition, construction, and operational phase to maximum extent feasible. No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Solid Waste Reduction Goals and Regulations Consistency Previous EIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to solid waste reduction goals and regulations consistency would be less than significant. Solid waste generated during the demolition, construction, and operational phase of the project would be properly disposed of or recycled in a nearby landfill or approved disposal facility with capacity to receive the waste. Any materials used during demolition and construction would be properly disposed of in accordance with federal, State, and local regulations. Therefore, it was concluded that impacts related to solid waste facilities, statutes, and regulations would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis
No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable solid waste disposal and recycling regulations. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 161
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Conclusion
The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to Utilities and Services Systems, as found in the previous FEIR. No new impacts are found and no mitigation is required.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
Further environmental analysis is not required because:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been identified which results in a significant effect not discussed in the previous FEIR or an impact which is more severe than shown in the previous FEIR.
4. No new mitigation measures are necessary.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
162 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XIX. Wildfire
If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair
an adopted
emergency
response plan or
emergency
evacuation plan?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Due to slope,
prevailing winds,
and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby
expose project
occupants to,
pollutant
concentrations from
a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread
of a wildfire?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
c) Require the
installation or
maintenance of
associated
infrastructure (such
as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency
water sources,
power lines or other
utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in
temporary or
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 163
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
ongoing impacts to
the environment?
d) Expose people or
structures to
significant risks,
including
downslope or
downstream
flooding or
landslides, as a
result of runoff,
post-fire slope
instability, or
drainage changes?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) Emergency Response/Evacuation Plan Consistency
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plan consistency would be less than significant. The project site is flat, outside the Wildland Urban Interface, and is not located in a High Severity Zone for wildfire. The City of Milpitas Fire Department Office of Emergency Services coordinates the City’s preparedness efforts to mitigate, plan for, respond to, and recover from natural and technological disasters. In addition, the County of Santa Clara Office of Emergency Services coordinates countywide emergency response efforts including the preparation and implementation of the County of Santa Clara EOP. It was concluded that development of the previously approved project would not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan and would thus have a less than significant impact.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
164 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Consistent with the analysis in the previous FEIR, the project site continues to be located outside the Wildland Urban Interface and is not located in a High Severity Zone for wildfire. 62,63 Like the previously approved project, it would be served by the Milpitas Fire Department and subject to the County of Santa Clara EOP. The proposed project is located on the same site as the previously approved project and does not alter the site’s physical characteristics or its relationship to surrounding areas susceptible to wildfire hazards. As such, the potential for wildfire risk based on factors including proximity to wildland areas, prevailing climatic conditions, and emergency response accessibility remains unchanged from the analysis in the previous FEIR. Because of the substantial similarities in project size as compared to the previously approved project as well as the proposed project’s consistency with zoning, it would not be expected to substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR and. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
b) Expose Project Occupants to Pollutant Concentrations from Wildfire Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to the exposure of project occupants to pollutant concentrations from wildfire would be less than significant. The project site is flat and is bound by existing development on all sides. The project site is outside the Wildland Urban Interface and is not considered a High Severity Zone for wildfire. Therefore, it was concluded the previously approved project would not exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, and this impact would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project is located on the same site as evaluated in the previous FEIR, and there have been no changes with respect to land designation. The site continues to be outside the Wildland Urban Interface and is not designated as a High Severity Zone for wildfire. The project site is not located in an area containing slope, prevailing winds, or other factures (such as significant vegetation) that would exacerbate wildfire risks and related pollutant exposure. Overall, no changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. As such, impacts would be less than
62 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2024. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area. Website: https://calfire-
forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=988d431a42b242b29d89597ab693d008. Accessed July 22, 2025.
63 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). Compare Old (2007-2011) with New (2025) Recommended FHSZ in LRA. 2025. Website:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/5065c998b4b0462f9ec3c6c226c610a9/page/Compare-old-and-new-LRA- FHSZ#data_s=id%3Awidget_114_output_config_default_geocode_0_0%3A. Accessed July 22, 2025.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 165
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
c) Infrastructure that Exacerbates Fire Risk
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to infrastructure that would exacerbate wildfire risk would be less than significant. The project site is outside the Wildland Urban Interface and is not considered a High Severity Zone for wildfire. Therefore, it was concluded that the previously approved project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure and this impact would be less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
As discussed above, the proposed project is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone.
As with the approved project, the proposed project does not include or require the installation or maintenance of for the purposes of wildfire safety. Installation and maintenance of infrastructure such as utility lines, would occur primarily on-site or within the roadway rights-of-way directly adjacent where the risk of wildfire is minimal. Therefore, the proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or may result in a temporary or ongoing impact to the environment and impacts would be less than significant. As such, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
d) Flooding and Landslide Hazards Due To Post-fire Slope Instability/Drainage Changes
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded impacts related to flooding and landslide hazards due to post-fire instability and drainage changes would be less than significant. The project site is flat and is not located within very high fire hazard severity zone. Therefore, it was concluded the previously approved project would not expose people or structures to significant risks as a result of post -fire slope instability or drainage and runoff changes.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The proposed project is located on the same site as the approved project. Conditions at the project site have not changed related to lack of significant slope or potential for flooding. No changes have occurred that would alter the conclusion of the previous FEIR. As such, impacts would be less than significant and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified in the previous FEIR.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
166 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Conclusion
The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to Wildfire , as found in the previous FEIR. No new impacts are found and no mitigation is required.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
Further environmental analysis is not required because:
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous FEIR.
3. No new information of substantial importance has been identified which results in a significant effect not discussed in the previous FEIR or an impact which is more severe than shown in the previous FEIR.
4. No new mitigation measures are necessary.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 167
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
XX. Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project
have the potential
to substantially
degrade the quality
of the environment,
substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species,
cause a fish or
wildlife population
to drop below self-
sustaining levels,
threaten to
eliminate a plant or
animal community,
substantially reduce
the number or
restrict the range of
a rare or
endangered plant
or animal, or
eliminate important
examples of the
major periods of
California history or
prehistory?
Less than
significant
with
mitigation
incorporated
No No No MM BIO-1,
MM CULT-1,
MM CULT-2
b) Does the project
have impacts that
are individually
limited, but
cumulatively
considerable?
(“Cumulatively
considerable”
means that the
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM TRANS-1
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
168 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in Previous
EIR
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
incremental effects
of a project are
considerable when
viewed in
connection with the
effects of past
projects, the effects
of other current
projects, and the
effects of probable
future projects)?
c) Does the project
have environmental
effects, which will
cause substantial
adverse effects on
human beings,
either directly or
indirectly?
Potentially
significant
impact
No No No None
Discussion
a) Potential Environmental Degradation
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded that the incorporation of biological and cultural mitigation measures would reduce related potential impacts to less than significant.
Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
As previously discussed herein, the proposed project would have the potential to disturb active nests if trees or vegetation are removed during nesting season and therefore would have the potential to threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. However, as indicated, with the implementation of MM BIO-1 from the previous FEIR, the proposed project’s impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 169
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Also previously discussed herein, the proposed project would have the potential to result in inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or burial sites during construction and therefore would have the potential to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. However, as indicated, with the implementation of MM CULT-1 and -2 from the previous FEIR, the proposed project’s impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR. b) Cumulatively Considerable Impacts
Previous FEIR Conclusions
Air Quality
The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project could contribute to cumulative environmental impacts when combined with the effects of past, present and future projects related to regional air quality (criteria pollutants). Implementation of MM AIR-1 would reduce criteria pollutant impacts but was deemed difficult to enforce and therefore it was concluded that significant impacts on regional air quality would be significant and unavoidable. Therefore, the project’s contribution would be cumulatively considerable.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project could contribute to cumulative environmental impacts when combined with the effects of past, present and future projects related to the generation of greenhouse gases. Implementation of MM GHG-1 would reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the maximum extent feasible and would have likely reduced the previously approved project’s emissions to below the applicable threshold with the purchase of carbon credits. However, the full implementation of MM GHG-1 hinges on the availability of carbon credits. Therefore, due to the uncertainty of carbon credit opportunities, successful implementation of MM GHG -1 was considered speculative and impacts were conservatively considered significant and unavoidable.
Accordingly, it was concluded that the previously approved project would have cumulatively considerable impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions.
Transportation
The previous FEIR concluded that the previously approved project could contribute to cumulative environmental impacts when combined with the effects of past, present and future projects related to conflicts with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) (VMT). The previously approved project would have resulted in a VMT per employee exceeding the applicable significance threshold.
Implementation of MM TRANS-1 would require the implementation of a TDM program. However, it was recognized that the effectiveness of the MM could not be assured and, as such, it was concluded that impacts related to VMT would be significant and unavoidable. Therefore, the previously approved project’s contribution would be cumulatively considerable.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
170 FCS
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
The project changes identified in Table 1 do not contribute to new cumulative environmental impacts.
The proposed uses are consistent with local zoning and general plan policies and do not materially alter the regional cumulative scenario considered in the previous FEIR. Project design features, mitigation measures and compliance with regulatory requirements continue to address cumulative concerns related to air quality, greenhouse gases, and transportation.
Air Quality
As previously discussed herein, the proposed project would not result in construction or operation impacts related to criteria pollutants. In comparison to the conclusions in the previous FEIR, the proposed project would result in similar construction impacts but would result in less operation impacts (due to a significant reduction in project truck trips). As such, the proposed project’s criteria pollutant impacts would be less than significant, would not require mitigation and would not be cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As previously discussed herein, unlike the previously approved project, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions as a result of 2022 CAP consistency.
Therefore, no mitigation is necessary and impacts would not be cumulatively considerable and t he proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR.
Transportation
As di
scussed herein, the proposed project would be consistent with the analysis in the previous FEIR and, like the previously approved project, would exceed the applicable VMT per employee threshold.
As such, implementation of previous MM TRANS-1 would be required. Like the previously approved project, because the effectiveness of the MM cannot be assured, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable and cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR. c) Adverse Effects on Human Beings
Previous FEIR Conclusions
The previous FEIR concluded that the proposed project could cause adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Because the previous FEIR concluded that there would be significant unavoidable impacts, and because those impacts related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions could directly and indirectly impact human beings, impacts would be significant and unavoidable in this regard.
1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE
15164 ADDENDUM TO THE 1000 GIBRALTAR DRIVE FINAL EIR
FCS 171
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/Addendum/edit/18980015 1000 Gibraltar Dr Addendum Update.docx Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion
Based on the information provided throughout this Addendum, the proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because, unlike the previously approved project, the project’s potential impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level including those related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Emergency access, noise conditions, and public service and utility demands remain within the scope originally analyzed. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not identified in the previous FEIR.
Mitigation Measures
Implement MM AIR-3, MM BIO-1, MM CULT-1, MM CULT-2, and MM TRANS-1.
Conclusion
Consistent with the previous FEIR, the proposed project would result in significant impacts related to Mandatory Findings with respect to VMT. However, no new impacts are found.
The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the previous FEIR and would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the
15164 Addendum to the 1000 Gibraltar Drive Final
Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse No. 2020069024)
City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County, California
PREPARED FOR:
City of Milpitas
455 East Calaveras Boulevard
Milpitas, CA 95035
408.586.3274
Contact: Kristina Phung, Senior Planner
PREPARED BY:
FirstCarbon Solutions
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
Contact: Janna Waligorski, Project Director
Brittany Perez, Project Manager
August 22, 2025
•• • FCS
An ADEC Innovation
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum Section 15164
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
FCS 1
Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx
PREFACE
Consistent with Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was adopted in conjunction with the certification of the 1000 Gibraltar Drive Final Environmental Impact Report (previous FEIR, State Clearinghouse No. 2020069024) to implement the certified previous FEIR and to monitor the implementation of the mitigation measures that were adopted by the Lead Agency. As discussed in the Addendum, the MMRP has been updated herein to identify the relevant mitigation measures applicable to the 1000 Gibraltar Drive project evaluated in this Addendum.
The Addendum prepared for previous FEIR concluded that implementation of the proposed project could result in potentially significant effects on the environment, similar to those identified in the previous FEIR. As such, the previously approved mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval that reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. This MMRP documents how and when the mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency’s previous FEIR will be implemented for the proposed project and confirms that potential environmental impacts are reduced to less than significant levels as identified in the Addendum to the previous FEIR.
This document does not discuss those subjects that the environmental analysis demonstrates would result in less than significant impacts and for which no mitigation was proposed or necessary. This MMRP identifies those mitigation measures from the previous FEIR that remain applicable to the proposed project. No new mitigation is necessary or required.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 3
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Table 1: 1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum Section 15164 Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
III. Air Quality
MM AIR-3: Fugitive Dust Control during Project
Construction
During Project construction, the contractor shall implement a dust control program that includes the following
measures recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (Bay Area Air District):
• All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads)
shall be watered two times per day.
• All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.
• All visible mud or dirt trackout onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour.
• All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved
shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads
shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding or soil binders are used.
• A publicly visible sign shall be posted with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency
regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond
and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Bay Area Include in contract
specifications; periodic site
inspection; submittal of
inspection logs; review and
approval of monitoring report,
an independent construction
monitor shall issue a letter
report to the City of Milpitas
Building Division documenting
the inspection results.
During construction
(City shall verify a
minimum of four (4)
documented
inspections)
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 4
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
Air District phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
The above measures shall be included in contract
specifications. In addition, an independent construction monitor shall conduct periodic site inspections, but in no event less than four total inspections, during the course of construction to ensure these mitigation measures are
implemented and shall issue a letter report to the City of Milpitas Building Division documenting the inspection
results. Reports indicating noncompliance with construction mitigation measures shall be cause to issue a stop work order until such time as compliance is achieved.
IV. Biological Resources
MM BIO-1: Nesting Birds and Roosting Bats
If feasible, all vegetation removal shall be conducted during the non-breading season (i.e., September 1 to January 31) to avoid the direct impacts to nesting birds. If such work is scheduled during the breeding season, a qualified Biologist or ornithologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey to determine if any birds are nesting within the project site.
The pre-construction survey shall be conducted within 15 days prior to the start of work from March through May
(since there is a higher potential for birds to initiate nesting during this period), and within 30 days prior to the start of work from June through August. If active nests are found during the survey, the Biologist or ornithologist shall determine an appropriately sized buffer around the nest in which no work shall be allowed until the young have
Project applicant or contractor
shall submit the Biologist’s
resume or curriculum vitae (CV)
demonstrating relevant
education, certifications, and
field experience to the City;
project applicant shall also
submit a copy of executed
contract with the Biologist,
showing scope of work and
timeline to City; confirmation
that pre-construction surveys
were conducted by qualified
Biologist
15 days prior to the
start of construction
from March through
May, and 30 days
prior to the start of
construction from
June through August
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 5
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
successfully fledged. The size of the buffer shall be
determined by the Biologist or ornithologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW), and would be based on the nesting species, its
sensitivity to disturbance, and the expected types of
disturbance.
In order to avoid impacts to roosting bats, a pre-
construction habitat assessment and survey(s) for bat
roosts shall be conducted in any large trees (dbh >24
inches) within 100 feet of any planned work areas and in any buildings planned for demolition. This effort shall occur prior to the start of work to evaluate whether potential roost habitat occurs and to determine the type (i.e., maternity or nonmaternity) and status (i.e., active or inactive) of the roost. If an active maternity or special-status bat roost is found, removal of maternity roost trees or building shall be avoided during the maternity roosting season or until a qualified Biologist determines the roost has been vacated.
Felled trees without maternity or special status roosts shall be allowed to lay on the ground for one night to allow any undetected roosting bats to leave the tree before it is chipped or taken off-site.
V. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
MM CULT-1: Unanticipated Discovery Protocol for
Archaeological Resources
If indigenous or historic-era archaeological resources are encountered during proposed Project development or
operation, all activity within 100 feet of the find shall cease and the find shall be flagged for avoidance. The City and a Inclusion on project plans;
Project applicant or contractor
shall submit the qualified
Archaeologist’s resume or
curriculum vitae (CV)
demonstrating relevant
In the event of
resource discovery
during development
or operation
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 6
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
qualified Archaeologist, defined as one meeting the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archeology, shall be immediately informed of the discovery. The qualified Archaeologist shall inspect the find within 24 hours of discovery and notify the City of their initial assessment. If the resource is indigenous, the City shall also contact relevant California Native American
Tribes to assist in determining if the resource may qualify as a Tribal Cultural Resource.
If the City determines, based on recommendations from the qualified Archaeologist and, if the resource is indigenous, relevant California Native American Tribes, that the
resource may qualify as a historical resource or unique archaeological resource (as defined in CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5), or a Tribal Cultural Resource (as defined in
Public Resources Code § 21074), the resource shall be
avoided if feasible. Avoidance means that no activities associated with the proposed Project that may affect
cultural resources shall occur within the boundaries of the resource or any defined buffer zones. If avoidance is not feasible, the City shall consult with appropriate Native American Tribes (if the resource is indigenous), and other appropriate interested parties to determine treatment
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any potential
impacts to the resource pursuant to Public Resources
Code § 21083.2 and CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4. This
shall include documentation of the resource and may
include data recovery or other measures. Treatment for
most resources would consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site
education, certifications, and
field experience to the City;
project applicant shall also
submit a copy of executed
contract with the Archaeologist,
showing scope of work and
timeline to the City; submittal of
the professional-level technical
report to the City; the City
Planning Department and
qualified Archaeologist shall be
immediately notified of any
discovery.
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 7
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource. The resource and treatment method shall be documented in a professional- level technical report to be filed with the California
Historical Resources Information System. Work in the area may commence upon completion of approved treatment
and under the direction of the qualified Archaeologist.
MM CULT-2: Unanticipated Discovery Protocol for
Human Remains
If human remains are uncovered during proposed Project
construction, all work shall immediately halt within 100 feet of the find and the Santa Clara County Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains and follow the
procedures and protocols set forth in CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(e)(1). If the county coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the City shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), in
accordance with Health and Safety Code § 7050.5(c) and
Public Resources Code § 5097.98. As required by Public
Resources Code § 5097.98, the City shall ensure that
further development activity avoids damage or disturbance in the immediate vicinity of the Native American human
remains, according to generally accepted cultural or
archaeological standards or practices, until the City has conferred with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains.
Inclusion on project plans;
confirm construction activities
have ceased, and the County
Coroner has been contacted as
recorded in daily construction
logs; confirm contact with MLD
and compliance with Public
Resources Section 5097.98 via
written or email
correspondence
In the event of
discovery of remains
during project
construction
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 8
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
VII. Geology and Soils
MM GEO-1: Paleontological Resources Sensitivity
Prior to conducting ground disturbing activities, the
applicant shall inform its contractor(s) of the sensitivity of the project area for paleontological resources and shall include the following directive in the appropriate contract documents. The City shall verify that the following directive is included in the appropriate contract documents:
The subsurface of the construction site may be sensitive for paleontological resources. The contractor shall provide information to construction crews on how to recognize
paleontological resources. If paleontological resources are encountered during project subsurface construction, all ground disturbing activities within 25 feet of the find shall be redirected and the City and a qualified paleontologist contacted. Project personnel shall not collect or move any paleontological materials. Paleontological resources
include fossil plants and animals, and such trace fossil evidence of past life as animal tracks.”
The City and a qualified Paleontologist shall make
recommendations for the treatment of the discovery. If
found to be significant, and project activities cannot avoid the paleontological resources, adverse effects to
paleontological resources shall be mitigated. Mitigation may include monitoring, recording the fossil locality, data recovery and analysis, preparation of a technical report, and providing the fossil material and technical report to a paleontological repository, such as the University of
California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP). Public
Inclusion in project contract
documents; confirm
construction operations and
activities are halted and
redirected to a qualified
paleontologist as recorded in
daily construction log; Review
and approval of a
paleontological resources
impact mitigation plan that is
incorporated into project plans
Prior to ground
disturbing activities
In the event of
discovery of
resources
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 9
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
educational outreach may also be appropriate. Upon
completion of the assessment, a report documenting
methods, findings, and recommendations shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review.
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
MM HAZ-1: Soil Management Plan
A Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a
qualified environmental professional to outline soil
management protocols that would be implemented during
project construction to ensure that construction workers, the public, future site occupants, and the environment
would not be exposed to hazardous materials (e.g.,
arsenic) that may be present in soil at the project site. The SMP shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits. The SMP shall include, but not be limited to the following:
• Procedures for soil management including identification and testing of contaminants, soil stockpiling procedures, soil reuse guidelines, and soil disposal methods.
• Requirements for notification to the City and any
applicable regulatory agency(ies) of previously unknown hazardous materials found in soil during development.
• Guidelines for controlling dust during excavation and grading.
All recommendations included in the SMP shall be
implemented during the demolition, grading, and
construction phase of the project. Prior to the City’s
approval of building occupancy, the applicant shall provide Review and approval of SMP
by the City;
Confirmation of implementation
of al recommendations included
in the SMP
Submittal of soils report for
review and approval by the City
Prior to issuance of
demolition or grading
permits
During demolition,
grading, and
construction
Prior to approval of
building occupancy
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
City of Milpitas
Planning Department
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 10
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
the City with a report prepared by a qualified environmental professional documenting that soils on the project site were managed in accordance with the SMP during demolition,
grading, and construction, and that appropriate safeguards (e.g., capping of remaining arsenic impacted soil with clean fill or hardscape materials) have been incorporated into the project design, as necessary, to ensure that the public, future site occupants, and the environment would not be exposed to unacceptable health risks from residual
hazardous materials in the subsurface of the project site.
XVII. Transportation
MM TRANS-1: Travel Demand Management Program
The Project applicant shall implement a travel demand
management program for all employees with the goal of
reducing the use of single-occupant vehicles for
commuting. The measures most likely to be effective given the Project’s location and expected use type include the following (measures are identified with the California Air Pollution Control Officers (CAPCOA) Quantifying
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010)
measure number and VMT reduction effectiveness range):
• Implement a commute trip reduction program with
required implementation and monitoring (CAPCOA
measure TRT-2, effectiveness range 4.2 percent–21.0
percent);
• Provide ride-sharing programs (CAPCOA measure TRT-
3, effectiveness range 1–15 percent);
Review and approval of VMT
Strategy Report by the City
Submission to the City of
annual monitoring
memorandum.
Prior to the issuance
of an occupancy
permit
Prior to December 31,
annually.
City of Milpitas
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 11
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• Implement subsidized or discounted transit program
(CAPCOA measure TRT-4, effectiveness range 0.3
percent–20 percent);
• Provide end-of-trip facilities (CAPCOA measure TRT-5, effectiveness based on effectiveness of measures TRT-2
and TRT-3);
• Implement commute trip reduction marketing (CAPCOA
measure TRT-7, effectiveness range 0.8 percent–4.0
percent);
• Implement car-sharing program (CAPCOA measure
TRT-9, effectiveness range 0.4 percent–0.7 percent);
• Restripe Green Bike lanes along property frontage; and • Bike locker subsidy.
(a) VMT Strategy Report
• Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit (Tenant to provide after 90 days of occupation), the Project
Applicant (or Project site operator) shall prepare a VMT Strategy Report that includes the following items:
• Identification of a baseline Project home-based work
VMT per employee estimate, which shall be determined
using project-specific information derived from location- based data services such as StreetLight data which can
estimate the trip generation, trip lengths, and VMT for the site. This shall be supplemented/verified by driveway counts, employee commute mode surveys, and
employee residence data which can provide a second
VMT estimate to verify the StreetLight estimate. Other
methods may be approved by City staff if new data
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 12
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
sources and methods become available by the time of
the Project is occupied
• Identification of the Santa Clara County regional home- based work VMT per employee, also derived from
StreetLight data to provide an apples to apples
comparison to the Project-specific baseline.
• Identification of the percent reduction in VMT needed to achieve the target of 15 percent below the regional
average.
• Identification of selected transportation demand
management strategies per the above list, and others if appropriate.
• Demonstration of how the TDM strategies in the VMT
Strategy Report would reduce the home-based work
VMT per employee generated by the Project to 15
percent below the countywide average home-based
work VMT per employee.
• After implementing the transportation demand
management strategies selected in the VMT Strategy
Report upon occupancy of the Project, the effectiveness of these measures relative to the performance target
noted previously must be monitored, as follows.
(b) Project Site VMT Monitoring Approach Monitoring
• The Project shall be monitored by the City or by the
Project application/operator on an annual basis to
determine the efficacy of the selected transportation
demand management strategies in achieving the
performance target of 15 percent below the regional
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 13
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
average. The monitoring shall include Project-generated VMT estimates compatible with the methodology used to
estimate project baseline VMT so that performance
comparisons can be made. The methodology for setting
the baseline VMT and measuring the annual
performance shall be defined in the VMT Strategy
Report.
• An annual monitoring memorandum shall be submitted
to City staff. If the Project site is found not to be in compliance with the mitigation measure, the Project
must incorporate additional transportation demand
management strategies to meet the performance target.
The Project applicant/operator may propose new
strategies that develop over time to further reduce
Project-generated VMT if substantial evidence is
provided to support the efficacy of the strategy. If a 15 percent VMT reduction is achieved for three consecutive years, the project will no longer need to provide annual reporting.
(c) Alternative Monitoring Approach
• The City of Milpitas may develop a citywide VMT
monitoring program to allow global monitoring of City
VMT, which may provide cost efficiencies and be a more
effective way to track VMT generation by various uses in the City. The monitoring program could make use of
emerging technologies including location-based services on cell phones and in vehicles to track trip lengths, along with traditional technologies such as driveway traffic
counts. If such a program is developed, the Project could
1000 GIBRALTAR WAREHOUSE ADDENDUM SECTION 15164
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS 14
https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/1898/18980015/MMRP/18980015 Gibraltar Warehouse Addendum MMRP.docx Requirements Method of Verification
Timing of
Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
participate in the monitoring and demonstrate
performance relative to the Project’s VMT target.
XX. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Implement MM AIR-3, MM BIO-1, MM CULT-1, MM CULT-2 and MM TRANS-1.
1000 Gibraltar Drive
15164 Addendum to the 1000 Gibraltar Drive Final EIR
FCS
Appendix A:
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions,
and Energy Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1 45
49 50
51 87
91 93
95 98
100
Appendix A: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and
Energy Supporting Information
Table of Contents
CalEEMod Outputs and Supporting Calculations
AERMOD DPM and PM2.5 Source Emissions
Sensitive Receptors Figure
San Jose Met Data WindRose Construction Hours
AERMOD Outputs
Health Risk Assessment Methodology
Resident Health Risks
Worker Health Risks
Stationary Sources Map
Bay Area Road and Rail Risk
Project CAP Checklist
Energy Calculations
113
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
1 / 42
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Appendix A
1
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
2 / 42
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.1. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.1. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Appendix A
2
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
3 / 42
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Appendix A
3
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
4 / 42
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Appendix A
4
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
5 / 42
5.17. User Defined
8. User Changes to Default Data
Appendix A
5
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
6 / 42
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
Construction Start Date 9/1/2025
Operational Y ear 2026
Lead Agency City of Milpitas
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 31.0
Location 37.419106378943, -121.89216244474264
County Santa Clara
City Milpitas
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 1999
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Silicon Valley Clean Energy
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.29
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Appendix A
6
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
7 / 42
—57,230146,661484,28414.61000sqft484Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
Unrefrigerated
portion
of
warehouse,
includes
lot acreage
of the entire
w
arehouse, and
total landscaping,
and total
bioretention
Refrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
3.28 1000sqft 0.00 3,280 0.00 0.00 — Refrigerated por
tion
of warehouse
Parking Lot 12.2 Acre 12.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 — All hardscape User Defined
Industrial
488 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Dumm
y land use for
passenger trips
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 3.99 1.92 39.2 27.8 0.16 0.86 22.2 23.1 0.70 4.04 4.74 — 23,479 23,479 1.87 3.35 46.6 24,571 2026 1.78 1.48 9.48 16.1 0.03 0.27 2.26 2.52 0.25 0.55 0.80 — 5,004 5,004 0.20 0.39 11.4 5,135 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 3.96 2.53 40.6 27.8 0.16 1.04 22.2 23.1 0.96 4.04 4.74 — 23,474 23,474 1.86 3.36 1.21 24,523 2026 350 350 9.77 15.0 0.04 0.27 2.26 2.52 0.25 0.55 0.80 — 5,498 5,498 0.41 0.78 0.30 5,740 Appendix A
7 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
8 / 42
——————————————————Average
Daily
2025 0.66 0.43 5.46 5.14 0.02 0.15 2.20 2.35 0.13 0.45 0.58 — 2,723 2,723 0.19 0.33 2.32 2,829 2026 15.5 15.3 6.13 9.28 0.02 0.17 1.34 1.51 0.15 0.33 0.48 — 3,068 3,068 0.13 0.25 3.03 3,148 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.12 0.08 1.00 0.94 < 0.005 0.03 0.40 0.43 0.02 0.08 0.11 — 451 451 0.03 0.05 0.38 468 2026 2.83 2.79 1.12 1.69 < 0.005 0.03 0.25 0.28 0.03 0.06 0.09 — 508 508 0.02 0.04 0.50 521
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.8 11.5 13.5 136 0.34 0.23 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 — 34,362 34,362 1.27 1.56 117 34,977 Area 15.7 15.4 0.18 21.2 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 87.2 87.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 87.5 Energy 0.08 0.04 0.69 0.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 852 852 0.07 < 0.005 — 854 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 216 4.75 221 22.2 0.53 — 932 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 247 0.00 247 24.7 0.00 — 864 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Stationa
ry
0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295
User-De
fined
0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Total 28.8 27.3 15.5 160 0.35 0.35 29.8 30.1 1.32 7.55 8.87 463 35,835 36,298 48.2 2.09 205 38,332 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.3 11.0 15.9 119 0.31 0.23 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 — 32,221 32,221 1.41 1.70 3.04 32,766 Area 11.9 11.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.08 0.04 0.69 0.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 852 852 0.07 < 0.005 — 854 Appendix A
8 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
9 / 42
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 216 4.75 221 22.2 0.53 — 932 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 247 0.00 247 24.7 0.00 — 864 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Stationa
ry
0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295 User-De
fined
0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Total 24.6 23.3 17.7 121 0.32 0.31 29.8 30.1 1.30 7.55 8.84 463 33,607 34,070 48.3 2.23 90.5 36,033 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 12.1 10.9 14.9 117 0.32 0.23 29.2 29.4 0.21 7.40 7.61 — 32,516 32,516 1.35 1.64 50.6 33,090 Area 13.8 13.6 0.09 10.5 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 43.0 43.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.2 Energy 0.08 0.04 0.69 0.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 852 852 0.07 < 0.005 — 854 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 216 4.75 221 22.2 0.53 — 932 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 247 0.00 247 24.7 0.00 — 864 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Stationa
ry
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 20.2 User-De
fined
0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Total 26.2 24.7 16.7 128 0.32 0.32 29.2 29.5 0.30 7.40 7.70 463 33,671 34,134 48.3 2.17 138 36,126 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.22 1.98 2.72 21.3 0.06 0.04 5.33 5.37 0.04 1.35 1.39 — 5,383 5,383 0.22 0.27 8.39 5,478 Area 2.51 2.49 0.02 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.12 7.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.15 Energy 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 141 141 0.01 < 0.005 — 141 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 35.8 0.79 36.6 3.67 0.09 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 40.9 0.00 40.9 4.09 0.00 — 143 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.5 14.5
Stationa
ry
< 0.005 < 0.005 <
0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 3.34 Appendix A
9
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
10 / 42
38.9———38.938.9—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.030.190.030.04User-De fined
Total 4.78 4.51 3.05 23.4 0.06 0.06 5.33 5.39 0.05 1.35 1.41 76.7 5,575 5,651 7.99 0.36 22.9 5,981
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
1.68 1.40 12.8 14.1 0.02 0.47 — 0.47 0.44 — 0.44 — 2,193 2,193 0.09 0.02 — 2,200 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 16.6 16.6 — 2.51 2.51 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
1.68 1.40 12.8 14.1 0.02 0.47 — 0.47 0.44 — 0.44 — 2,193 2,193 0.09 0.02 — 2,200 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 16.6 16.6 — 2.51 2.51 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
10 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
11 / 42
Off-Roa
Equipment
0.14 0.12 1.05 1.16 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 180 180 0.01 < 0.005 — 181 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 1.36 1.36 — 0.21 0.21 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.03 0.02 0.19 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.9 Demoliti
on
— — — — — — 0.25 0.25 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 171 171 < 0.005 0.01 0.68 174 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 2.24 0.45 26.4 12.9 0.14 0.39 5.47 5.86 0.26 1.50 1.76 — 21,115 21,115 1.77 3.33 45.9 22,196 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 159 159 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 161 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 2.22 0.43 27.8 13.0 0.14 0.39 5.47 5.86 0.26 1.50 1.76 — 21,123 21,123 1.77 3.33 1.19 22,162 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.18 0.04 2.24 1.06 0.01 0.03 0.44 0.47 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,736 1,736 0.15 0.27 1.63 1,822 Appendix A
11
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
12 / 42
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.18 2.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.22 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.03 0.01 0.41 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 287 287 0.02 0.05 0.27 302
3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
2.93 2.46 23.0 21.7 0.03 1.04 — 1.04 0.96 — 0.96 — 3,785 3,785 0.15 0.03 — 3,798 Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 5.29 5.29 — 2.63 2.63 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.02 0.02 0.19 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 31.1 31.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.2 Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Appendix A
12 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
13 / 42
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.15 5.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.17 Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 159 159 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 161 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.32 1.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.22 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.22 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix A
13
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
14 / 42
3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
2.28 1.91 17.1 20.6 0.03 0.78 — 0.78 0.72 — 0.72 — 3,223 3,223 0.13 0.03 — 3,234 Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 1.69 1.69 — 0.67 0.67 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.11 0.09 0.84 1.02 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
14 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
15 / 42
26.4—< 0.005< 0.00526.326.3—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.190.150.020.02Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent
Dust
From
Material
Movement
—
— — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 218 218 0.01 0.01 0.02 221 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.20 0.04 2.56 1.20 0.01 0.04 0.50 0.54 0.02 0.14 0.16 — 1,950 1,950 0.16 0.31 0.11 2,046 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.9 10.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.12 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 96.2 96.2 0.01 0.02 0.09 101 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.80 1.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.9 15.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 16.7
3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Appendix A
15
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
16 / 42
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.96 0.80 6.65 7.08 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.01 — 1,167 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.10 0.08 0.66 0.71 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 117 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.3 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
16 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
17 / 42
Worker 0.67 0.66 0.63 7.17 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.69 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,626 1,626 0.04 0.07 0.18 1,648 Vendor 0.20 0.08 2.91 1.36 0.01 0.03 0.56 0.59 0.03 0.16 0.19 — 2,157 2,157 0.12 0.31 0.15 2,253 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 166 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 215 215 0.01 0.03 0.25 225 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.6 35.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 37.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.92 0.77 6.42 7.05 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,163 1,163 0.05 0.01 — 1,167 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
17 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
18 / 42
1,167—0.010.051,1631,163—0.22—0.220.24—0.240.017.056.420.770.92Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.54 0.45 3.76 4.12 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 681 681 0.03 0.01 — 683 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.10 0.08 0.69 0.75 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 113 Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.66 0.65 0.43 7.81 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.69 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,722 1,722 0.03 0.07 6.28 1,749 Vendor 0.20 0.06 2.63 1.29 0.01 0.03 0.56 0.59 0.03 0.16 0.19 — 2,119 2,119 0.12 0.31 5.16 2,219 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.64 0.57 0.57 6.66 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.69 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,595 1,595 0.04 0.07 0.16 1,617 Vendor 0.20 0.06 2.78 1.31 0.01 0.03 0.56 0.59 0.03 0.16 0.19 — 2,120 2,120 0.12 0.31 0.13 2,215 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix A
18
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
19 / 42
——————————————————Average
Daily
Worker 0.37 0.33 0.29 3.85 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 944 944 0.02 0.04 1.59 957 Vendor 0.12 0.04 1.59 0.76 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.34 0.02 0.09 0.11 — 1,240 1,240 0.07 0.18 1.30 1,297 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 156 156 < 0.005 0.01 0.26 158 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 205 205 0.01 0.03 0.22 215 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.40 0.33 3.13 4.37 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 665 665 0.03 0.01 — 667 Paving 3.19 3.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.2 18.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.3 Appendix A
19 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
20 / 42
Paving 0.09 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.01 3.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.03 Paving 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 58.4 58.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 59.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.48 0.10 6.19 2.91 0.03 0.06 1.26 1.32 0.06 0.35 0.41 — 4,775 4,775 0.38 0.77 0.26 5,013 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.62 1.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.17 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 0.02 0.12 137 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.27 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.7 21.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 22.8
3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Appendix A
20
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
21 / 42
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.72 0.60 5.59 6.85 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 977 977 0.04 0.01 — 980 Architect
ural
Coating
s
349 349 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.03 0.02 0.23 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 40.1 40.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.3 Architect
ural
Coating
s
14.3 14.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.65 6.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.67 Appendix A
21 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
22 / 42
————————————————2.622.62Architect
ural
Onsite
truck
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.11 0.11 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 319 319 0.01 0.01 0.03 323 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.3 13.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Appendix A
22
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
23 / 42
CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGLand Use
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.41 0.07 5.08 2.38 0.04 0.07 1.20 1.27 0.07 0.32 0.39 — 4,507 4,507 0.34 0.72 9.54 4,739 Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.05 0.01 0.56 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 499 499 0.04 0.08 1.06 524 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
12.3 11.4 7.81 134 0.29 0.15 28.5 28.6 0.13 7.19 7.32 — 29,357 29,357 0.89 0.76 107 29,713 Total 12.8 11.5 13.5 136 0.34 0.23 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 — 34,362 34,362 1.27 1.56 117 34,977 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.41 0.06 5.36 2.39 0.04 0.07 1.20 1.27 0.07 0.32 0.39 — 4,508 4,508 0.34 0.72 0.25 4,731 Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.05 0.01 0.59 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 499 499 0.04 0.08 0.03 524 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
11.8 10.9 9.91 116 0.27 0.15 28.5 28.6 0.13 7.19 7.32 — 27,215 27,215 1.04 0.90 2.77 27,511 Total 12.3 11.0 15.9 119 0.31 0.23 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 — 32,221 32,221 1.41 1.70 3.04 32,766 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
23
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
24 / 42
Unrefrig
Warehouse-Rail
0.08 0.01 0.96 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.23 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 746 746 0.06 0.12 0.68 784 Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.05 < 0.005 <
0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 82.6 82.6 0.01 0.01 0.08 86.7 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
2.13 1.97 1.65 20.8 0.05 0.03 5.09 5.12 0.02 1.29 1.31 — 4,555 4,555 0.16 0.14 7.63 4,608 Total 2.22 1.98 2.72 21.3 0.06 0.04 5.33 5.37 0.04 1.35 1.39 — 5,383 5,383 0.22 0.27 8.39 5,478
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 31.1 31.1 0.00 0.00 — 31.1
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 — 0.49
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 2.98 0.00 0.00 — 2.98
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Appendix A
24
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
25 / 42
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 34.6 34.6 0.00 0.00 — 34.6 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 31.1 31.1 0.00 0.00 — 31.1
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 — 0.49
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2.98 2.98 0.00 0.00 — 2.98
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 34.6 34.6 0.00 0.00 — 34.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5.15 5.15 0.00 0.00 — 5.15
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 — 0.08
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 — 0.49
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.72 5.72 0.00 0.00 — 5.72
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Appendix A
25
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
26 / 42
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.08 0.04 0.68 0.57 < 0.005 0.05
— 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 815 815 0.07 < 0.005 — 818
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 <
0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.14 2.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.14 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.08 0.04 0.69 0.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 818 818 0.07 < 0.005 — 820 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
0.08 0.04 0.68 0.57 < 0.005 0.05
— 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 815 815 0.07 < 0.005 — 818
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 <
0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.14 2.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.14 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.08 0.04 0.69 0.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 818 818 0.07 < 0.005 — 820 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
26
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
27 / 42
Unrefrig
Warehouse-Rail
0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 — 135 Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
< 0.005 < 0.005 <
0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.35 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.35 Parking
Lot
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 User
Defined
Industrial
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 — 136
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s
10.5 10.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s
1.43 1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent
3.77 3.48 0.18 21.2 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 87.2 87.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 87.5 Total 15.7 15.4 0.18 21.2 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 87.2 87.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 87.5 Appendix A
27 -------------------
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
28 / 42
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Consum
er
Product
s
10.5 10.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s
1.43 1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 11.9 11.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Product
s
1.91 1.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s
0.26 0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent
0.34 0.31 0.02 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.12 7.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.15 Total 2.51 2.49 0.02 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.12 7.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.15
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix A
28
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
29 / 42
Unrefrig
Warehouse-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 215 4.72 219 22.0 0.52 — 925
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 0.03 1.48 0.15 < 0.005 — 6.27 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 216 4.75 221 22.2 0.53 — 932 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 215 4.72 219 22.0 0.52 — 925
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 0.03 1.48 0.15 < 0.005 — 6.27 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 216 4.75 221 22.2 0.53 — 932 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 35.5 0.78 36.3 3.64 0.09 — 153
Appendix A
29
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
30 / 42
1.04—< 0.0050.020.250.010.24———————————Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 35.8 0.79 36.6 3.67 0.09 — 154
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 245 0.00 245 24.5 0.00 — 858
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.66 0.00 1.66 0.17 0.00 — 5.81
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 247 0.00 247 24.7 0.00 — 864 Appendix A
30
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
31 / 42
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 245 0.00 245 24.5 0.00 — 858
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.66 0.00 1.66 0.17 0.00 — 5.81
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 247 0.00 247 24.7 0.00 — 864 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrig
erated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 40.6 0.00 40.6 4.06 0.00 — 142
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.03 0.00 — 0.96
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 40.9 0.00 40.9 4.09 0.00 — 143
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Appendix A
31
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
32 / 42
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 87.4 87.4
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Refriger
ated
Wareho
use-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.5 14.5
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 14.5 14.5
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Appendix A
32
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
33 / 42
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fire
Pump
0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295 Total 0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fire
Pump
0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295 Total 0.08 0.17 0.16 1.46 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 294 294 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fire
Pump
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 3.34 Appendix A
33
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
34 / 42
Total < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 0.00 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 3.34
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3 TRUs
(per Trip
gen f
or
cold
storage)
0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Total 0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3 TRUs
(per Trip
gen f
or
cold
storage)
0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Total 0.20 0.17 1.03 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 1.02 — 1.02 — 235 235 — — — 235 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3 TRUs
(per Trip
gen f
or
cold
storage)
0.04 0.03 0.19 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 38.9 38.9 — — — 38.9 Total 0.04 0.03 0.19 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 38.9 38.9 — — — 38.9 Appendix A
34
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
35 / 42
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 9/1/2025 10/10/2025 5.00 30.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2025 10/15/2025 5.00 3.00 — Grading Grading 10/16/2025 11/10/2025 5.00 18.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 11/11/2025 10/26/2026 5.00 250 — Paving Paving 10/27/2026 11/9/2026 5.00 10.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/10/2026 11/30/2026 5.00 15.0 —
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 4.00 5.30 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 7.04 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 5.28 367 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 7.04 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 5.28 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 5.83 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 3.00 2.97 148 0.41 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 5.28 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 3.00 6.27 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 3.74 367 0.40 Appendix A
35
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
36 / 42
0.3784.07.593.00AverageDieselGrading Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Grading Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 2.00 3.74 33.0 0.73
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 1.32 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.05 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 4.00 6.05 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 4.29 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 3.85 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.04 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 7.04 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.04 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.31
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 295 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Appendix A
36
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
37 / 42
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 27.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 27.2 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 205 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 79.9 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 7.50 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 68.0 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 41.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Appendix A
37
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
38 / 42
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 731,346 243,782 31,808
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic
Y ards)
Material Exported (Cubic
Y ards)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of
Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,373 —
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 4.64 0.00 —
Grading 3,913 0.00 25.4 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.2
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 0.00 0%
Refrigerated Warehouse-Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 12.2 100%
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Appendix A
38
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
39 / 42
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 2.34 0.00 0.00
2026 0.00 2.34 0.00 0.00
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
27.1 27.1 27.1 9,899 1,302 1,302 1,302 475,141
Refrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
3.00 3.00 3.00 1,095 144 144 144 52,581
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial
3,779 3,779 3,779 1,379,197 40,713 40,713 40,713 14,860,362
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 731,346 243,782 31,808
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Appendix A
39
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
40 / 42
Summer Days day/yr 180
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
4,851,467 2.34 0.0000 0.0000 2,544,560
Refrigerated Warehouse-Rail 76,271 2.34 0.0000 0.0000 6,668 Parking Lot 464,390 2.34 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 2.34 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 111,990,675 2,315,641
Refrigerated Warehouse-Rail 758,500 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 455 —
Refrigerated Warehouse-Rail 3.08 —
Appendix A
40
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
41 / 42
Parking Lot 0.00 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Refrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
Cold storage R-404A 3,922 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor Fire Pump Diesel 1.00 2.00 50.0 175 0.73
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
3 TRUs (per Trip gen for cold storage) Diesel
Appendix A
41
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Custom Report, 7/17/2025
42 / 42
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Characteristics: Utility Information In Milpitas, California, the electricity provider is Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), while PG&E handles the deliver
y and billing.
Land Use Land uses are based on project specific site plan.
Construction: Construction Phases Schedule is based on applicant provided information Construction: Off-Road Equipment Adjusted per applicant provided info Construction: Trips and VMT Added 68 daily haul trips to the paving phase to account for pavement material Operations: Vehicle Data Truck trip length calculated based on origins from traffic study. Truck and passenger car trip gen from traffic study.
Operations: Fleet Mix Truck fleet mix - assigned 100% to HHDT to be conservative. Passenger vehicle fleet mix - assumes 50% of passenger tr
ips to be LDT1 (light duty trucks) to account for 3PL delivery, the proportion of LDA, LDT2, and MDV is based on county average.
Operations: Generators + Pumps EF Updated Emission factors to Tier 4 to comply with BAAQMD BACT for emergency diesel engines.
Appendix A
42
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
Demolition Debris Calculations
Description Area 1
(square feet)
height/depth
(ft)
Volume
(ft3)
Demolition Waste
Fraction
Demolition
Volume1 (ft3)
Demolition Waste
Density (tons/cy)
Demolition
Weight
(tons)
Buildings 284,762 10 2,847,620 0.25 711,905 0.50 13,183 Pavement 591,723 0.5 295,862 1 295,862 2.025 22,190 35,373
Notes:
1 Source:
3. Source: ICF in collaboration with Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Fehr & Peers, STI and Ramboll. 20 22. CalEEMod Appendix C Emission Calculation Details for Building demolition estimates are based on methods used in CalEEMod (CAPCOA, 2022), based on 1 story building , assume 10 ft p er floor where 1 square ft floor area = 10 cubic ft (ft 3) of building volume, and 1 ft3 of building volume = 0.25 ft 3 of waste. This approach can be used to estimate demolition for multiple story buildings. It also assumes 1 cubic yard (cy) bu ilding waste = 0.5 ton weight
1 cubic yard of asphalt = 2.025 tons or 4050 lbs.
Totals
1. Assumptions: Building demolition estimates are based on methods used in CalEEMod (CAPCOA, 2022), based on 1 story building , assume 10 ft per floor where 1 square ft floor area = 10 cubic ft (ft3) of building volume, and 1 ft 3 of building volume = 0.25 ft 3 of waste. This approach can be used to estimate demolition for multiple story buildings. It also assumes 1 cubic yard (cy) bu ilding waste = 0.5 ton weight
2. Assumptions: 1 cubic yard of asphalt = 2.025 tons or 4050 lbs.
Appendix A
43
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
TRU emission inventory
Model Output: Off-Road Web Query (v1.1.1) Emissions Inventory Region Type: County
Region: Santa Clara
Calendar Year: 2026
Scenario: All Adopted Rules - Exhaust
Vehicle Classification: Off-Road Web Query Equipment Types Units: tons/day for Emissions, gallons/year for Fuel, hours/year for Activity, Horsepower-hours/year for Horsepower-hours Region Calendar Year Vehicle Categor
y Model YearHorsepoweFuel HC_tpd ROG_tpd TOG_tpd CO_tpd NOx_tpd CO2_tpd PM10_tpd PM2.5_tpd SOx_tpd NH3_tpd Fuel Consu mTotal_Activity_hpy Total_Pop Santa Clara 2026
Transport Refrigeration Unit -
Instate Trailer Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.02616222 0.031666 0.037685 0.029067 0.192847 43.91327 0.004862 0.0044727 0.000416 9.84587E-07 1428356.9 2009184.64 1120.34
0.7109137 gal/hr
per unit HC ROG TOG CO NOx CO2 PM10 PM2.5 SOx NH3
tpd per unit 2.3352E-05 2.83E-05 3.36E-05 2.59E-05 0.000172 0.039196 4.34E-06 3.992E-06 3.72E-07 8.78829E-10 ppd per uni
t 0.04670407 0.056529 0.067273 0.05189 0.344265 78.39276 0.008679 0.0079846 0.000743 1.75766E-06 ton per year 0.00852349 0.010316 0.012277 0.00947 0.062828 14.30668 0.001584 0.0014572 0.000136 3.20773E-07 Appendix A
44
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
AERMOD DPM Sources
SITE1_UM Site - Off-Road Equipment Diesel Exhaust1 Project Site - Construction Area Area 117035.6 m2 5 — 1.4 0.0363 3.911E-08 g/m2-sec ROAD1_DPM Haul Road - On-Road Diesel Exhaust 2,3 Truck Route - South Milpitas Boulevard Line-Volume 1117.6 meters 3.40 12.56 3.16 4.07E-04 5.1E-05 g/s Monday - Friday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 1 1 1 1
13-18 0 1 1 1 1 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saturday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0
13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sunday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0
13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
AERMOD Source
Emission Rate
Variable Emission Factors: ALL Sources
1 Construction exhaust modeled as an area source. Release parameters for construction equipment DPM exhaust modeling from SCAQMD (2008) for gaseous exhaust from construction equipment.
Initial Lateral
Dimension
Initial Vertical
DimensionSize
Release
Height
Source Release Parameters (m)
Source ID Emissions4 (lb/hr)
4 Emissions from CalEEModeling for Construction modeled during construction hours as included in Attachment A. See Note 2 above regarding roadway emission portion modeled.
2 Emissions for On-Road Mobile Sources (Vendor and Haul Diesel Exhaust) modeled only for roadways within 1,000 feet of the site within the modeling domain.
3 Parameters calculated as per US EPA Haul Road Workgroup Final Report released on March 2, 2012 which suggests the use of Adjacent Volume Sources to represent the haul road.
Modeled Source Location Description Source Type
Appendix A
45
Net Work Days 326
Net Construction Years 1.25
Total Working Hours 2,608
Worker Vendor Haul
2025 Demolition 14.21 11.70 0 0 11.70
2025 Site Preparation 3.12 0.00 0 0 0
2025 Grading 14.07 0.65 0 0 0.65
2025 Building Construction 9.60 1.08 0 1.08 0
2026 Building Construction 50.71 6.32 0 6.32 0
2026 Paving 1.41 0.60 0 0 0.60
2026 Architectural Coating 1.62 0.00 0 0 0
94.74 20.35 - 7.40 12.95
Note: PM10E = PM10 Exhaust which is a surrogate for Diesel Exhaust, particulate matter Worker Vendor Haul
11.7 8.4 20
0.69 0.69 0.69
6% 8% 3%
`
Worker Vendor Haul
Modeled Emissions (lbs) 94.74 1.061 - 0.61 0.45
Source acres/miles
% of Source
Type lbs lb/hr
Site Emissions 28.92 100% 94.74 0.036
Roadway Emissions 0.69 100% 1.061 4.07E-04
Roadway Emissions included
Off-Site DPM(lbs)Off-Site DPM
(lbs)
Off-site
Roadway
DPM
Off-Site Diesel PM (lbs)
within 1,000 ft Roadways
CalEEMod Distance (miles)
Roadways Included within 1,000 ft
Total PM Exhaust (On-site)
On-site
Construction
DPM
Construction Year Construction Activity On-site DPM
(lbs)
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
DPM Emissions
Appendix A
46
SITE1_UM Site - Off-Road Equipment PM2.51 Project Site - Construction Area Area 117035.6 m2 5 — 1.4 0.082 0.00E+00 g/m2-sec ROAD1_PM25 Haul Road - On-Road PM2.5 2,3 Truck Route - South Milpitas Boulevard Line-Volume 1117.6 meters 3.40 12.56 3.16 0.0049 0.00E+00 g/s Monday - Friday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 1 1 1 1
13-18 0 1 1 1 1 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saturday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0
13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sunday
1-6 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-12 0 0 0 0 0 0
13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0
19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source Release Parameters (m)
Source ID Modeled Source Location Description Source Type Size 4 Emissions from CalEEModeling for Construction modeled during construction hours as included in Attachment A. See Note 2 above regarding roadway emission portion modeled.
5 Construction exhaust modeled as an area source. Modeled as per BAAQMD 2022 CEQA Guidelines which permits PM2.5 Dust to be modeled along with PM2.5Exhaust.
Emissions4 (lb/hr)
AERMOD Source
Emission Rate
Variable Emission Factors: ALL Sources
1 Construction exhaust modeled as an area source. Release parameters for construction equipment DPM exhaust modeling from SCAQMD (2008) for gaseous exhaust from construction equipment. 2 Emissions for On-Road Mobile Sources (Vendor and Haul Diesel Exhaust) modeled only for roadways within 1,000 feet of the site within the modeling domain.
3 Parameters calculated as per US EPA Haul Road Workgroup Final Report released on March 2, 2012 which suggests the use of Adjacent Volume Sources to represent the haul road.
Release
Height
Initial Lateral
Dimension
Initial Vertical
Dimension
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
AERMOD PM2.5 Sources
Appendix A
47
260
1.00 Net Work Days
Net Construction Years
Total Working Hours
2,080
% Inc
luded in
Max Year Worker Vendor Haul
2025 Demolition 100% 88.30 53.21 1.14 - 52.07
2025 Site Preparation 100% 10.75 0.11 0.11 - 0.00
2025 Grading 100% 24.95 3.82 0.94 - 2.88
2025 Building Construction 100% 8.83 20.81 14.15 6.66 0.00 2026 Building Construction 81.7% 46.66 121.98 82.94 39.04 - Total PM2.5 179.48 199.93 99.28 45.70 54.95
Max Year PM2.5 170.94 177.60 84.09 38.55 54.95
Worker Vendor Haul
11.7 8.4 20
0.69 0.69 0.69
6% 8% 3%
` Haul Vendor Worker
Modeled Emissions (lbs) 170.94 10.089 4.99 3.19 1.91
Source acres/miles
% of Source
Type lbs lb/hr
Site Emissions 28.92 100% 170.94 0.082
Roadway 1 Emissions 0.69 100% 10.089 4.85E-03
Off-Site PM2.5T (lbs)
CalEEMod Distance (miles)
Roadways Included within 1,000 ft
Roadway Emissions included
On-site
Construction
PM2.5T
Off-site
Roadway
PM2.5T
Off-Site PM2.5 (lbs)
within 1,000 ft Roadways
*PM2.5 Emissions are modeled for the maximum annual emissions which is 9/1/2025 to 9/1/2026.
Construction Year* Construction Activity
On-site
PM2.5T
(lbs)
Off-Site PM2.5T
(lbs)
Note: PM2.5T = PM2.5 Total including PM2.5 Exhaust (on and off-road), Fugitive Dust from Demolition, Site Preparation and Grading, as well as brake wear, tire wear and re-entrained road dust. 1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
PM2.5 Emissions
Appendix A
48
PROJECT TITLE:
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
DPM Construction HRA
Project
Legend:
Site ■
■
Receptor Legend:
● Residential Receptor
● Non-Residential Receptor
■
Maximally Exposed Individual
Resident (MEIR)
■
Maximally Exposed Individual
Worker (MEIW)
SCALE:
1:6,707
0 0.2 km
AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software F:\Jobs\18980015\ConHRA2\ConHRA2.isc Appendix A
49 0
0 (")
N
"""
~
"""
0 0
N
N
""" """
0 0
~
N
""" """
0 0
0 N
""" ~""" .s
..c 0
0 t'. en
0 ~
z """
~
~ """ I- 0 ::J 0
CX)
~
"""
~
"""
0 0
r--
~
"""
~
"""
0 0
<D
~
"""
~
"""
0 0
l!)
~
"""
~
"""
0 0
"""
~
"""
~
"""
'
..
✓-"~ .. . . .
. : ... ; .. .. -..... ·: ... .. ., .. . . .. · ... . .... .. . . . . .....
\ \
• ;.<>"""
\ . (.~ . .
. ,
. .
...
. . . .
h ' W
.
· ...
.
\ ... : ·. . . . . . \ . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .... .... . . . . . . . . .. .... . . \ \
..
. .
597600 597700 597800 597900
.. . . .
.
\
..... ..
. . .
I
\ .
\
\
\
\
\
\ • . \ .
..
. . . . . . .
\
.
,.,d'; •••
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . : : .. · .... .. .. . ...
. .
•\ .
•I • .. ...
. . . . .
mm
. . . . . · . ..
..
598000 598100 598200
UTM East [m]
598300 598400 598500
•• • FCS
An ADEC Innovation
WIND ROSE PLOT: DISPLAY:
San Jose International Airport - KSJC Wind Speed
Wind Direction during Construction Hours Direction (blowing from)
NORTH
24.8%
19.8%
14.9%
9.92%
4.96%
WEST EAST
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 11.10
8.80 - 11.10
5.70 - 8.80
SOUTH 3.60 - 5.70
2.10 - 3.60
0.50 - 2.10
Calms: 0.90%
COMMENTS:
Wind Rose is generated just for the
hours with emissions when
construction would occur or from
8 AM – 5 PM. This corresponds to the
modeling hours in AERMOD.
DATA PERIOD:
Start Date: 1/1/2013 - 08:00
End Date: 12/31/2017 - 17:00
How to Read a Wind Rose Diagram
The wind rose above shows the general wind direction
and speed for the meteorological data set used in the
AERMOD modeling for the project.’
The circular format of the wind rose shows the direction the winds blew from and the length of each "spoke"
around the circle shows how often the wind blew from
that direction.
CALM WINDS:
0.90%
AVG. WIND SPEED:
3.77 m/s
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
Appendix A
50 --D
D
D
-
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Flat & Elevated Terrain
No Stack-Tip Downwash (NOSTD)
Run in Screening Mode
Conversion of NOx to NO2 (OLM or PVMRM)
No Checks for Non-Sequential Met Data
Fast All Sources (FASTALL)
Fast Area Sources (FASTAREA)
Optimized Area Source Plume Depletion
Gas Deposition
BETA Options:
Capped and Horizontal Stack Releases
Adjusted Friction Velocity (u*) in AERMET (ADJ_U*)
Low Wind Options
SCIM (Sampled Chronological Input Model)
Ignore Urban Night / Daytime Transition (NOURBTRAN)
Total Deposition (Dry & Wet)
Dry Deposition
Wet Deposition
Output Type
Concentration
Regulatory Default Non-Default Options
Dispersion Options
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
DPM Construction HRA
Titles
Dispersion Options
Population:
Name (Optional):
Roughness Length:
Plume Depletion
Dry Removal
Wet Removal
Output Warnings
No Output Warnings
Non-fatal Warnings for Non-sequential Met Data
Dispersion Coefficient
Urban
Pollutant / Averaging Time / Terrain Options
TG: Meters
RE: Meters
SO: Meters1 2 3 4 6 8 1 2 24
ElevatedFlat
Hours Terrain Height Options
Averaging Time Options
Yes No
Exponential DecayPollutant Type
Annual
Month Period
PM10
Flagpole Receptors
NoYes
Default Height = 0.00 m
Appendix A
51 Q [:J
[:J
Q
[:J Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q
Q
Q
Q [:J
QQQQQQQQ
Q [:J
Q [:J Q
Q [:J
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Optional Files
Re-Start File Multi-Year Analyses Event Input File Error Listing File Init File
Detailed Error Listing File
Filename: ConHRA2.err
Appendix A
52 lr:1
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Polygon Area Sources
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: SITE_DPM (SITE_DPM)
X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
11.13 5.00 1.40 42 597864.00 4142013.263.91E-8
598042.15 4142112.633.91E-8
598337.90 4141750.443.91E-8
598339.07 4141742.803.91E-8
598336.13 4141733.983.91E-8
598326.73 4141728.683.91E-8
598317.91 4141722.223.91E-8
598308.50 4141716.343.91E-8
598295.56 4141710.463.91E-8
598280.87 4141705.753.91E-8
598266.75 4141699.873.91E-8
598255.58 4141697.523.91E-8
598243.24 4141696.933.91E-8
598230.30 4141696.933.91E-8
598219.72 4141695.173.91E-8
598204.43 4141693.993.91E-8
598185.62 4141692.823.91E-8
598167.98 4141690.473.91E-8
598149.16 4141688.113.91E-8
598132.11 4141686.353.91E-8
598112.71 4141682.233.91E-8
598092.13 4141677.533.91E-8
598075.67 4141670.483.91E-8
598059.79 4141667.543.91E-8
598045.09 4141665.773.91E-8
598026.28 4141671.653.91E-8
598007.46 4141678.123.91E-8
597990.41 4141700.463.91E-8
597973.95 4141731.043.91E-8
597961.60 4141756.913.91E-8
Appendix A
53
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: SITE_DPM (SITE_DPM)
X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
597952.78 4141777.493.91E-8
597945.73 4141795.713.91E-8
597941.61 4141811.593.91E-8
597932.20 4141836.283.91E-8
597924.56 4141860.393.91E-8
597918.68 4141876.263.91E-8
597911.62 4141895.673.91E-8
597903.39 4141918.603.91E-8
597896.34 4141935.653.91E-8
597888.10 4141957.993.91E-8
597881.64 4141976.223.91E-8
597870.47 4141997.973.91E-8
Appendix A
54
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: SITE_PM25 (SITE_PM25)
X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
11.13 5.00 1.40 42 597864.00 4142013.268.83E-8
598042.15 4142112.638.83E-8
598337.90 4141750.448.83E-8
598339.07 4141742.808.83E-8
598336.13 4141733.988.83E-8
598326.73 4141728.688.83E-8
598317.91 4141722.228.83E-8
598308.50 4141716.348.83E-8
598295.56 4141710.468.83E-8
598280.87 4141705.758.83E-8
598266.75 4141699.878.83E-8
598255.58 4141697.528.83E-8
598243.24 4141696.938.83E-8
598230.30 4141696.938.83E-8
598219.72 4141695.178.83E-8
598204.43 4141693.998.83E-8
598185.62 4141692.828.83E-8
598167.98 4141690.478.83E-8
598149.16 4141688.118.83E-8
598132.11 4141686.358.83E-8
598112.71 4141682.238.83E-8
598092.13 4141677.538.83E-8
598075.67 4141670.488.83E-8
598059.79 4141667.548.83E-8
598045.09 4141665.778.83E-8
598026.28 4141671.658.83E-8
598007.46 4141678.128.83E-8
597990.41 4141700.468.83E-8
597973.95 4141731.048.83E-8
597961.60 4141756.918.83E-8
597952.78 4141777.498.83E-8
Appendix A
55
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: SITE_PM25 (SITE_PM25)
X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
11.13 5.00 1.40 42 597945.73 4141795.718.83E-8
597941.61 4141811.598.83E-8
597932.20 4141836.288.83E-8
597924.56 4141860.398.83E-8
597918.68 4141876.268.83E-8
597911.62 4141895.678.83E-8
597903.39 4141918.608.83E-8
597896.34 4141935.658.83E-8
597888.10 4141957.998.83E-8
597881.64 4141976.228.83E-8
597870.47 4141997.978.83E-8
Appendix A
56
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line Volume Sources
Source Type: LINE VOLUME
Source: ROAD_DPM (ROAD_DPM)
Release Height
[m]
Base Elevation
[m]
Y Coordinate for points
[m]
X Coordinate for Points
[m]
Length of Side
[m]
Emission Rate
[g/ s]
Building Height
[m]
27.00 0.00005 3.409.534142378.77597902.14
3.409.884142325.58597924.15
3.4010.844142224.71597973.67
3.4016.304141740.49598360.68
3.4016.664141679.97598395.52
3.4017.024141619.44598415.70
3.4017.314141549.74598428.54
3.4017.754141448.86598454.22
3.4017.684141459.87598454.22
3.4017.664141452.53598457.89
Source Type: LINE VOLUME
Source: ROAD_PM25 (ROAD_PM25)
Release Height
[m]
Base Elevation
[m]
Y Coordinate for points
[m]
X Coordinate for Points
[m]
Length of Side
[m]
Emission Rate
[g/ s]
Building Height
[m]
27.00 0.00061 3.409.534142378.77597902.14
3.409.884142325.58597924.15
3.4010.844142224.71597973.67
3.4016.304141740.49598360.68
3.4016.664141679.97598395.52
3.4017.024141619.44598415.70
3.4017.314141549.74598428.54
3.4017.754141448.86598454.22
3.4017.684141459.87598454.22
3.4017.664141452.53598457.89
Appendix A
57
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Volume Sources Generated from Line Sources
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
ROAD_DPM L0000165 597907.30 4142366.30 9.61 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000166 597917.63 4142341.35 9.78 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000167 597928.53 4142316.66 9.96 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000168 597940.43 4142292.43 10.20 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000169 597952.32 4142268.19 10.43 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000170 597964.22 4142243.95 10.66 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000171 597977.14 4142220.36 10.89 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000172 597994.00 4142199.27 11.13 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000173 598010.86 4142178.18 11.36 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000174 598027.71 4142157.09 11.60 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000175 598044.57 4142136.00 11.84 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000176 598061.43 4142114.91 12.08 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000177 598078.28 4142093.82 12.32 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000178 598095.14 4142072.73 12.55 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000179 598112.00 4142051.63 12.79 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000180 598128.85 4142030.54 13.03 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000181 598145.71 4142009.45 13.27 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000182 598162.57 4141988.36 13.51 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000183 598179.43 4141967.27 13.74 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000184 598196.28 4141946.18 13.98 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000185 598213.14 4141925.09 14.22 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000186 598230.00 4141904.00 14.46 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000187 598246.85 4141882.90 14.69 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000188 598263.71 4141861.81 14.93 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 Appendix A
58
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
ROAD_DPM L0000189 598280.57 4141840.72 15.17 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000190 598297.43 4141819.63 15.41 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000191 598314.28 4141798.54 15.65 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000192 598331.14 4141777.45 15.88 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000193 598348.00 4141756.36 16.12 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000194 598364.01 4141734.69 16.33 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000195 598377.49 4141711.29 16.47 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000196 598390.96 4141687.90 16.61 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000197 598401.17 4141663.03 16.76 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000198 598409.71 4141637.42 16.91 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000199 598417.16 4141611.52 17.05 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000200 598422.05 4141584.97 17.16 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000201 598426.94 4141558.42 17.27 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000202 598433.02 4141532.12 17.39 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000203 598439.68 4141505.96 17.50 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000204 598446.34 4141479.79 17.62 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 L0000205 598453.00 4141453.63 17.73 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.161.25E-6 Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
ROAD_PM25 L0000206 597907.30 4142366.30 9.61 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000207 597917.63 4142341.35 9.78 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000208 597928.53 4142316.66 9.96 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000209 597940.43 4142292.43 10.20 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000210 597952.32 4142268.19 10.43 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000211 597964.22 4142243.95 10.66 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 Appendix A
59
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
ROAD_PM25 L0000212 597977.14 4142220.36 10.89 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000213 597994.00 4142199.27 11.13 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000214 598010.86 4142178.18 11.36 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000215 598027.71 4142157.09 11.60 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000216 598044.57 4142136.00 11.84 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000217 598061.43 4142114.91 12.08 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000218 598078.28 4142093.82 12.32 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000219 598095.14 4142072.73 12.55 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000220 598112.00 4142051.63 12.79 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000221 598128.85 4142030.54 13.03 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000222 598145.71 4142009.45 13.27 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000223 598162.57 4141988.36 13.51 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000224 598179.43 4141967.27 13.74 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000225 598196.28 4141946.18 13.98 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000226 598213.14 4141925.09 14.22 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000227 598230.00 4141904.00 14.46 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000228 598246.85 4141882.90 14.69 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000229 598263.71 4141861.81 14.93 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000230 598280.57 4141840.72 15.17 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000231 598297.43 4141819.63 15.41 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000232 598314.28 4141798.54 15.65 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000233 598331.14 4141777.45 15.88 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000234 598348.00 4141756.36 16.12 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000235 598364.01 4141734.69 16.33 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000236 598377.49 4141711.29 16.47 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 Appendix A
60
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
ROAD_PM25 L0000237 598390.96 4141687.90 16.61 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000238 598401.17 4141663.03 16.76 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000239 598409.71 4141637.42 16.91 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000240 598417.16 4141611.52 17.05 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000241 598422.05 4141584.97 17.16 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000242 598426.94 4141558.42 17.27 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000243 598433.02 4141532.12 17.39 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000244 598439.68 4141505.96 17.50 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000245 598446.34 4141479.79 17.62 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 L0000246 598453.00 4141453.63 17.73 3.40 27.00 12.56 3.160.00001 Appendix A
61
Source Pathway
AERMOD
Option not in use
Building Downwash Information
Emission Rate Units for Output
For Concentration
Concentration Unit Label:
Emission Unit Label:
Unit Factor: 1E6
GRAMS/SEC
MICROGRAMS/M**3
PM25 List of Sources in Group (Source Range or Single Sources)Source Group ID:
SITE_PM25
ROAD_PM25
DPM List of Sources in Group (Source Range or Single Sources)Source Group ID:
SITE_DPM
ROAD_DPM
ALL List of Sources in Group (Source Range or Single Sources)Source Group ID:
All Sources Included
Source Groups
Variable Emissions
Appendix A
62
Source Pathway
AERMOD
Hour-of-Day / Day-of-Week Emission Rate Variation
Scenario: Scenario 1
SITE_DPMSource ID:
Weekdays
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Saturday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sunday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SITE_PM25Source ID:
Weekdays
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Saturday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sunday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ROAD_DPMSource ID:
Weekdays
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Saturday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sunday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ROAD_PM25Source ID:
Weekdays
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Appendix A
63
Source Pathway
AERMOD
Scenario: Scenario 1
ROAD_PM25Source ID:
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Saturday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sunday
Hour 1 - 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
of 7 - 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 13 - 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 - 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Appendix A
64
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
Receptor Networks
Note: Terrain Elavations and Flagpole Heights for Network Grids are in Page RE2 - 1 (If applicable) Generated Discrete Receptors for Multi-Tier (Risk) Grid and Receptor Locations for Fenceline Grid are in Page RE3 - 1 (If applicable) Uniform Cartesian Grid
Receptor
Network ID
Grid Origin
X Coordinate [m]
Grid Origin
Y Coordinate [m]
No. of X-Axis
Receptors
No. of Y-Axis
Receptors
Spacing for
X-Axis [m]
Spacing for
Y-Axis [m]
UCART1 597455.95 4141311.75 65.34 55.46 21 21
Discrete Receptors
Discrete Cartesian Receptors
X-Coordinate [m] Y-Coordinate [m] Terrain Elevations
Flagpole Heights [m]
(Optional)
Record
Number
Group Name
(Optional)
598056.86 4142200.88 12.021 Workers
598071.50 4142207.15 11.912 Workers
598088.75 4142216.56 11.683 Workers
598101.83 4142220.22 11.604 Workers
598095.03 4142238.52 11.185 Workers
598081.96 4142230.68 11.416 Workers
598065.23 4142228.59 11.327 Workers
598047.45 4142217.61 11.478 Workers
598038.56 4142238.52 10.869 Workers
598055.29 4142240.62 10.8710 Workers
598073.07 4142246.37 10.9211 Workers
598083.53 4142256.83 10.8412 Workers
598080.91 4142273.56 10.9113 Workers
598062.61 4142267.28 11.0214 Workers
598047.45 4142263.62 11.1815 Workers
598029.67 4142258.39 11.4516 Workers
598022.87 4142275.13 11.8417 Workers
598040.65 4142280.88 11.5718 Workers
598054.24 4142287.68 11.3519 Workers
598069.93 4142292.90 11.1020 Workers
598061.04 4142312.25 10.9821 Workers
598044.83 4142302.84 11.1322 Workers
598030.19 4142299.18 11.1323 Workers
598015.03 4142290.29 11.2624 Workers
598005.62 4142311.73 10.8625 Workers
598021.30 4142316.43 10.8826 Workers
Appendix A
65
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598032.81 4142325.32 10.9027 Workers
598049.54 4142328.46 10.9128 Workers
598044.83 4142348.85 11.2029 Workers
598018.17 4142335.78 11.2030 Workers
598010.32 4142332.64 11.2031 Workers
598000.39 4142329.51 11.2332 Workers
597992.02 4142342.58 11.8833 Workers
598008.75 4142348.33 11.6734 Workers
598025.49 4142350.42 11.5435 Workers
598040.65 4142361.92 11.5036 Workers
598088.75 4142348.85 12.0137 Workers
598104.44 4142356.17 12.3538 Workers
598114.90 4142363.49 12.5439 Workers
598124.31 4142369.24 12.5640 Workers
598133.20 4142354.08 12.5041 Workers
598123.26 4142349.38 12.3442 Workers
598109.15 4142345.19 12.1343 Workers
598095.03 4142339.44 11.8344 Workers
598100.26 4142327.41 11.6845 Workers
598112.81 4142335.78 11.9646 Workers
598124.83 4142339.96 12.1947 Workers
598136.34 4142344.15 12.4048 Workers
598145.23 4142328.98 12.5349 Workers
598128.49 4142325.85 12.2350 Workers
598120.13 4142321.14 12.0751 Workers
598108.10 4142314.34 11.8052 Workers
598114.38 4142298.13 12.0053 Wor kers
598127.45 4142308.59 12.3954 Workers
598136.86 4142311.21 12.6155 Workers
598151.50 4142314.87 12.3956 Workers
598201.49 4142068.57 13.1157 Workers
598105.71 4142137.88 13.4658 Workers
598117.71 4142146.76 13.2459 Workers
598123.93 4142152.99 13.1460 Workers
598133.27 4142158.32 12.9861 Workers
598143.49 4142165.43 12.7662 Workers
598152.82 4142152.99 12.4063 Workers
598139.94 4142147.65 12.5864 Workers
Appendix A
66
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598131.05 4142140.99 12.6865 Workers
598123.49 4142134.32 12.7166 Workers
598128.38 4142122.32 12.3967 Workers
598137.27 4142132.54 12.3968 Workers
598144.38 4142139.21 12.3869 Workers
598155.05 4142146.32 12.3470 Workers
598167.94 4142134.76 12.3671 Workers
598154.16 4142128.99 12.3472 Workers
598146.60 4142122.76 12.3373 Workers
598136.38 4142117.87 12.3674 Workers
598140.38 4142107.21 12.5475 Workers
598149.71 4142113.43 12.5776 Workers
598161.27 4142120.54 12.5577 Workers
598172.83 4142128.10 12.5178 Workers
598182.60 4142116.10 13.1179 Workers
598166.60 4142112.10 13.1080 Workers
598157.71 4142103.21 13.3481 Workers
598147.05 4142097.43 13.3682 Workers
598143.94 4142084.10 13.5683 Workers
598155.05 4142091.21 13.5484 Workers
598168.83 4142098.32 13.5185 Workers
598175.94 4142104.10 13.4286 Workers
598187.94 4142111.21 13.3987 Workers
598199.49 4142108.10 13.5988 Workers
598186.16 4142098.32 13.3189 Workers
598177.71 4142092.10 13.3090 Workers
598166.60 4142085.87 13.4791 Wor kers
598152.38 4142072.98 13.5492 Workers
598167.49 4142071.65 13.0993 Workers
598182.60 4142080.98 12.9794 Workers
598195.05 4142087.65 13.3495 Workers
598199.94 4142091.65 13.5196 Workers
598206.60 4142098.32 13.7597 Workers
598211.94 4142085.43 13.6698 Workers
598199.94 4142079.21 13.3199 Workers
598191.05 4142073.43 13.01100 Workers
598180.83 4142065.87 12.67101 Workers
598187.49 4142059.65 12.68102 Workers
Appendix A
67
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598195.05 4142065.43 12.93103 Workers
598211.49 4142077.87 13.49104 Workers
598223.94 4142072.54 13.70105 Workers
598213.72 4142065.87 13.35106 Workers
598205.72 4142060.09 13.08107 Workers
598190.60 4142047.65 12.58108 Workers
598197.72 4142036.54 13.10109 Workers
598209.72 4142048.09 13.24110 Workers
598217.27 4142053.43 13.43111 Workers
598230.16 4142063.21 13.80112 Workers
598239.49 4142051.65 14.01113 Workers
598224.38 4142042.76 13.55114 Workers
598217.27 4142034.76 13.52115 Workers
598208.38 4142028.09 13.49116 Workers
598195.94 4142021.43 13.49117 Workers
598261.72 4142087.65 14.39118 Workers
598251.05 4142105.43 14.34119 Workers
598239.05 4142116.54 14.32120 Workers
598233.72 4142124.54 14.33121 Workers
598220.38 4142142.76 14.06122 Workers
598212.83 4142150.32 13.82123 Workers
598205.27 4142158.77 13.78124 Workers
598198.60 4142165.88 13.77125 Workers
598187.49 4142181.43 13.72126 Workers
598151.94 4142208.99 13.09127 Workers
598162.16 4142213.88 13.44128 Workers
598171.49 4142218.77 13.33129 Wo rkers
598182.60 4142220.99 13.35130 Workers
598193.27 4142225.43 13.34131 Workers
598204.38 4142230.32 13.34132 Workers
598213.27 4142233.43 13.39133 Workers
598220.83 4142238.32 13.38134 Workers
598228.83 4142241.88 13.49135 Workers
598239.05 4142244.10 13.51136 Workers
598248.83 4142246.77 13.58137 Workers
598258.16 4142251.21 13.55138 Workers
598267.05 4142216.55 14.21139 Workers
598270.16 4142202.74 14.28140 Workers
Appendix A
68
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598271.05 4142189.88 14.34141 Workers
598280.51 4142153.46 14.45142 Workers
598276.73 4142171.83 14.36143 Workers
598284.39 4142136.80 14.49144 Workers
598288.68 4142117.33 14.53145 Workers
598292.83 4142102.76 14.41146 Workers
598262.29 4141991.31 15.83147 Workers
598244.24 4141982.54 15.92148 Workers
598275.14 4141976.96 15.66149 Workers
598254.44 4141967.43 16.11150 Workers
598285.71 4141961.09 15.54151 Workers
598267.29 4141951.94 15.99152 Workers
598295.83 4141947.95 15.16153 Workers
598281.64 4141934.18 15.07154 Workers
598309.43 4141933.97 15.34155 Workers
598292.60 4141918.32 15.23156 Workers
598324.68 4141917.85 16.19157 Workers
598308.85 4141906.23 16.00158 Workers
598345.64 4142165.74 15.21159 Workers
598348.21 4142144.54 15.37160 Workers
598353.03 4142124.63 15.43161 Workers
598355.28 4142111.47 15.41162 Workers
598359.77 4142096.69 15.74163 Workers
598408.59 4142126.24 15.33164 Workers
598418.54 4142127.52 15.35165 Workers
598406.98 4142135.87 15.37166 Workers
598401.52 4142148.72 15.45167 Wo rkers
598481.34 4141790.44 19.12168 Workers
598497.52 4141792.15 19.41169 Workers
598517.96 4141795.55 19.48170 Workers
598528.18 4141775.97 18.77171 Workers
598506.89 4141771.71 18.67172 Workers
598482.19 4141771.71 18.60173 Workers
598485.60 4141754.68 18.47174 Workers
598511.14 4141755.53 18.63175 Workers
598528.18 4141762.34 18.76176 Workers
598536.69 4141750.42 19.01177 Workers
598514.55 4141743.61 18.75178 Workers
Appendix A
69
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598495.82 4141742.76 18.51179 Workers
598496.67 4141722.32 18.75180 Workers
598514.55 4141732.54 19.09181 Workers
598542.65 4141735.94 19.77182 Workers
598540.10 4141721.47 19.21183 Workers
598518.81 4141718.91 19.01184 Workers
598506.03 4141714.65 18.80185 Workers
598506.03 4141695.92 18.67186 Workers
598521.36 4141704.44 18.70187 Workers
598539.25 4141706.99 18.74188 Workers
598545.21 4141697.62 18.80189 Workers
598526.47 4141690.81 18.81190 Workers
598504.33 4141686.55 18.75191 Workers
598511.14 4141671.23 19.20192 Workers
598538.39 4141676.34 19.35193 Workers
598552.02 4141678.04 19.57194 Workers
598578.42 4141638.02 18.96195 Workers
598555.42 4141630.35 19.37196 Workers
598536.69 4141625.24 19.60197 Workers
598540.95 4141601.40 19.45198 Workers
598563.94 4141613.32 19.02199 Workers
598584.38 4141616.73 18.65200 Workers
598589.49 4141603.95 18.66201 Workers
598564.79 4141593.74 19.12202 Workers
598541.80 4141586.92 19.52203 Workers
598548.61 4141573.30 19.41204 Workers
598574.16 4141577.56 19.00205 Wo rkers
598595.45 4141582.67 18.64206 Workers
598575.86 4141561.38 19.11207 Workers
598552.02 4141552.86 19.52208 Workers
598558.83 4141538.39 19.44209 Workers
598351.91 4141652.49 16.80210 Workers
598351.91 4141638.02 16.85211 Workers
598338.28 4141647.38 16.86212 Workers
598339.13 4141633.76 16.89213 Workers
598318.70 4141642.27 16.95214 Workers
598319.55 4141629.50 16.98215 Workers
598304.22 4141635.46 17.06216 Workers
Appendix A
70
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598311.03 4141618.43 16.96217 Workers
598178.19 4141630.35 15.70218 Workers
598195.22 4141635.46 15.68219 Workers
598221.62 4141636.31 15.80220 Workers
598176.49 4141616.73 15.68221 Workers
598200.33 4141619.28 15.67222 Workers
598216.51 4141623.54 15.75223 Workers
598241.21 4141628.65 15.75224 Workers
598242.06 4141615.02 15.91225 Workers
598223.32 4141610.77 15.75226 Workers
598202.89 4141606.51 15.65227 Workers
598193.52 4141601.40 15.64228 Workers
598114.33 4141598.85 14.46229 Workers
598091.33 4141592.88 14.47230 Workers
598069.19 4141588.63 14.46231 Workers
598052.16 4141586.07 14.49232 Workers
598024.91 4141582.67 14.47233 Workers
598024.06 4141560.53 14.57234 Workers
598047.91 4141565.63 14.58235 Workers
598074.30 4141569.89 14.53236 Workers
598091.33 4141574.15 14.54237 Workers
598120.29 4141579.26 14.14238 Workers
597977.23 4141569.04 13.61239 Workers
597976.38 4141553.71 13.62240 Workers
597958.49 4141565.63 13.59241 Workers
597959.35 4141548.60 13.60242 Workers
597936.35 4141552.01 13.54243 Wo rkers
597934.65 4141569.04 13.62244 Workers
597951.68 4141579.26 13.57245 Workers
597928.69 4141584.37 13.63246 Workers
597944.87 4141595.44 13.58247 Workers
597936.35 4141609.92 13.61248 Workers
597915.06 4141604.81 13.60249 Workers
597926.99 4141706.99 11.85250 Workers
597932.10 4141682.30 11.78251 Workers
597909.10 4141697.62 11.86252 Workers
597920.17 4141670.37 11.78253 Workers
597892.07 4141688.26 11.81254 Workers
Appendix A
71
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597902.29 4141666.97 11.80255 Workers
597875.89 4141678.04 11.76256 Workers
597883.56 4141654.20 11.81257 Workers
597869.93 4141645.68 11.79258 Workers
598338.28 4141820.25 16.76259 Workers
598351.05 4141833.02 16.75260 Workers
598346.35 4141808.18 16.75261 Workers
598358.72 4141817.69 16.74262 Workers
598313.59 4141850.05 16.30263 Workers
598327.42 4141859.27 16.35264 Workers
598305.01 4141859.75 16.34265 Workers
598317.20 4141868.40 16.42266 Workers
598327.21 4141878.15 16.38267 Workers
597856.31 4141676.34 11.38268 Workers
597877.60 4141702.73 11.50269 Workers
597862.27 4141696.77 10.94270 Workers
597855.46 4141712.10 11.28271 Workers
597867.38 4141717.21 11.54272 Workers
597869.08 4141727.43 11.68273 Workers
597860.57 4141724.87 11.57274 Workers
597844.39 4141717.21 11.41275 Workers
597832.47 4141713.80 11.48276 Workers
597829.06 4141728.28 11.69277 Workers
597840.13 4141735.09 11.72278 Workers
597853.75 4141738.50 11.70279 Workers
597863.12 4141741.90 11.70280 Workers
597859.71 4141754.68 11.68281 Wo rkers
597840.98 4141750.42 11.72282 Workers
597833.32 4141742.76 11.73283 Workers
597818.84 4141737.65 11.72284 Workers
597817.99 4141750.42 11.73285 Workers
597826.50 4141758.93 11.72286 Workers
597841.83 4141761.49 11.71287 Workers
597852.90 4141761.49 11.70288 Workers
597846.09 4141777.67 11.67289 Workers
597830.76 4141772.56 11.69290 Workers
597818.84 4141769.15 11.71291 Workers
597809.47 4141764.90 11.71292 Workers
Appendix A
72
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597801.81 4141775.97 11.70293 Workers
597821.40 4141786.18 11.75294 Workers
597827.36 4141787.89 11.75295 Workers
597840.13 4141791.29 11.72296 Workers
597835.02 4141804.92 11.75297 Workers
597823.95 4141798.96 11.77298 Workers
597812.03 4141794.70 11.74299 Workers
597800.96 4141789.59 11.67300 Workers
597851.20 4141893.48 10.91301 Workers
597857.62 4141878.71 10.91302 Workers
597865.68 4141861.97 10.90303 Workers
597852.05 4141858.57 10.88304 Workers
597847.79 4141872.19 10.93305 Workers
597839.28 4141887.52 10.98306 Workers
597824.80 4141882.41 10.91307 Workers
597834.17 4141866.23 10.92308 Workers
597842.09 4141851.41 10.90309 Workers
597830.76 4141845.79 10.86310 Workers
597824.80 4141859.42 10.89311 Workers
597813.73 4141880.71 10.90312 Workers
597802.59 4141876.32 10.84313 Workers
597810.24 4141857.54 10.98314 Workers
597820.54 4141841.53 10.92315 Workers
597803.51 4141834.72 11.17316 Workers
597800.11 4141850.90 10.85317 Workers
597789.04 4141866.23 10.41318 Workers
597776.26 4141861.97 10.14319 Wo rkers
597787.25 4141844.29 10.79320 Workers
597792.07 4141827.84 11.28321 Workers
597781.37 4141822.80 11.11322 Workers
597778.82 4141839.83 10.90323 Workers
597771.15 4141856.01 10.37324 Workers
597775.41 4141880.71 9.98325 Workers
597790.46 4141886.49 10.51326 Workers
597784.78 4141897.74 10.59327 Workers
597770.30 4141890.07 10.24328 Workers
597754.12 4141896.03 10.56329 Workers
597766.90 4141903.70 10.58330 Workers
Appendix A
73
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597784.78 4141905.40 10.68331 Workers
597780.52 4141921.58 10.74332 Workers
597765.19 4141913.92 10.74333 Workers
597747.31 4141908.81 10.83334 Workers
597741.35 4141922.43 10.87335 Workers
597758.38 4141929.24 10.85336 Workers
597768.60 4141934.35 10.84337 Workers
597766.90 4141951.38 10.88338 Workers
597749.87 4141943.72 10.88339 Workers
597732.83 4141937.76 10.88340 Workers
597725.17 4141949.68 10.85341 Workers
597745.61 4141959.90 10.85342 Workers
597756.68 4141959.90 10.87343 Workers
597751.57 4141976.08 10.83344 Workers
597738.80 4141971.82 10.83345 Workers
597722.28 4141966.53 10.83346 Workers
597718.55 4141975.16 10.82347 Workers
597733.18 4141981.87 10.82348 Workers
597749.87 4141988.85 10.78349 Workers
597767.75 4142041.65 10.45350 Workers
597756.68 4142037.39 10.46351 Workers
597743.91 4142030.58 10.50352 Workers
597723.47 4142020.36 10.52353 Workers
597720.91 4142027.17 10.54354 Workers
597734.54 4142037.39 10.52355 Workers
597753.27 4142049.31 10.48356 Workers
597766.05 4142056.97 10.47357 Wo rkers
597760.08 4142070.60 10.50358 Workers
597743.05 4142063.79 10.52359 Workers
597730.28 4142051.87 10.51360 Workers
597714.95 4142048.46 10.50361 Workers
597887.76 4142267.78 11.41362 Workers
597733.95 4142148.42 9.41363 Workers
597730.26 4142159.50 9.44364 Workers
597722.87 4142171.80 9.44365 Workers
597716.11 4142188.41 9.46366 Workers
597706.26 4142184.10 9.49367 Workers
597706.26 4142171.80 9.49368 Workers
Appendix A
74
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597712.42 4142158.88 9.49369 Workers
597719.18 4142141.65 9.47370 Workers
597713.65 4142135.50 9.48371 Workers
597705.65 4142149.65 9.49372 Workers
597702.57 4142160.11 9.49373 Workers
597697.03 4142176.11 9.49374 Workers
597684.11 4142169.95 9.52375 Workers
597689.04 4142160.73 9.51376 Workers
597696.42 4142147.19 9.52377 Workers
597702.57 4142134.27 9.51378 Workers
597695.80 4142128.12 9.49379 Workers
597692.73 4142141.65 9.54380 Workers
597684.11 4142151.50 9.54381 Workers
597677.35 4142165.65 9.55382 Workers
597663.20 4142163.19 9.26383 Workers
597667.50 4142150.27 9.14384 Workers
597673.66 4142136.73 9.16385 Workers
597680.42 4142121.35 9.29386 Workers
597673.04 4142117.66 9.24387 Workers
597666.27 4142137.96 8.88388 Workers
597663.81 4142147.81 8.95389 Workers
597659.50 4142158.26 9.06390 Workers
597645.35 4142157.03 9.19391 Workers
597653.35 4142144.73 8.60392 Workers
597661.97 4142124.43 8.84393 Workers
597666.27 4142113.35 9.37394 Workers
597661.35 4142109.66 9.39395 Work ers
597657.04 4142122.58 8.94396 Workers
597652.74 4142135.50 8.39397 Workers
597644.74 4142149.04 8.95398 Workers
597642.28 4142155.80 9.31399 Workers
597697.03 4142232.09 8.84400 Workers
597680.42 4142230.25 8.89401 Workers
597669.35 4142222.25 8.88402 Workers
597653.35 4142215.48 8.88403 Workers
597643.51 4142208.71 8.84404 Workers
597649.05 4142224.10 8.89405 Workers
597659.50 4142230.25 8.91406 Workers
Appendix A
75
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597671.81 4142235.17 8.89407 Workers
597687.19 4142239.48 8.91408 Workers
597687.81 4142251.78 8.90409 Workers
597673.66 4142245.01 8.90410 Workers
598448.19 4142017.94 16.68411 Workers
598452.96 4141999.74 16.60412 Workers
598457.62 4141982.43 16.34413 Workers
597965.95 4142098.36 10.91414 Workers
597939.91 4142103.37 10.88415 Workers
597954.93 4142111.39 10.88416 Workers
597966.96 4142119.40 10.89417 Workers
597962.95 4142135.43 10.97418 Workers
597940.91 4142129.42 10.94419 Workers
597929.89 4142122.41 10.89420 Workers
597923.88 4142136.43 10.93421 Workers
597943.91 4142144.45 11.00422 Workers
597950.93 4142163.48 10.92423 Workers
597926.88 4142155.47 10.88424 Workers
597916.86 4142148.46 10.86425 Workers
597909.85 4142169.49 10.94426 Workers
597931.89 4142181.52 11.15427 Workers
597928.89 4142195.54 10.92428 Workers
597903.84 4142185.52 10.92429 Workers
597904.84 4142207.57 10.98430 Workers
597908.85 4142224.60 11.26431 Workers
597882.80 4142215.58 11.03432 Workers
597859.76 4142206.56 10.38433 Wo rkers
597834.71 4142197.55 11.05434 Workers
597812.67 4142191.54 11.30435 Workers
597805.66 4142205.56 11.23436 Workers
597832.71 4142213.58 11.25437 Workers
597850.74 4142223.59 10.82438 Workers
597870.78 4142227.60 11.15439 Workers
597898.83 4142242.63 11.41440 Workers
597870.78 4142253.65 11.51441 Workers
597853.75 4142241.63 11.07442 Workers
597824.69 4142227.60 11.46443 Workers
597804.66 4142224.60 11.29444 Workers
Appendix A
76
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598494.93 4141850.91 18.28445 Workers
598515.97 4141856.92 18.32446 Workers
598532.00 4141863.93 18.40447 Workers
598547.03 4141867.94 18.74448 Workers
598576.08 4141906.01 19.17449 Workers
598568.07 4141929.05 19.31450 Workers
598597.12 4141836.88 20.21451 Workers
598606.14 4141805.82 19.77452 Workers
598610.15 4141777.77 19.71453 Workers
598619.16 4141755.73 19.78454 Workers
598627.18 4141726.68 19.67455 Workers
598638.20 4141768.75 20.14456 Workers
598629.18 4141804.82 20.08457 Workers
598619.16 4141835.88 20.32458 Workers
597931.95 4142182.87 11.13459 Workers
597630.21 4142000.18 8.52460 Resident
597614.89 4141989.57 9.71461 Resident
597596.03 4141984.86 9.70462 Resident
597616.07 4142023.75 9.09463 Resident
597603.10 4142010.79 9.79464 Resident
597588.96 4142006.08 9.76465 Resident
597566.57 4141995.47 9.64466 Resident
597561.85 4142017.86 9.72467 Resident
597574.82 4142028.47 9.73468 Resident
597596.03 4142035.54 9.75469 Resident
597607.82 4142036.72 9.49470 Resident
597593.68 4142057.94 9.65471 Reside nt
597587.78 4142052.04 9.75472 Resident
597576.00 4142042.61 9.71473 Resident
598274.94 4141551.11 15.20474 Resident
598279.65 4141538.15 15.29475 Resident
598279.65 4141525.18 15.31476 Resident
598264.33 4141519.29 15.43477 Resident
598259.62 4141534.61 15.37478 Resident
598256.08 4141545.22 15.37479 Resident
598227.79 4141539.33 15.28480 Resident
598231.33 4141525.18 15.35481 Resident
598238.40 4141512.22 15.46482 Resident
Appendix A
77
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598216.01 4141507.50 15.30483 Resident
598214.83 4141525.18 15.18484 Resident
598207.75 4141539.33 15.16485 Resident
598187.72 4141532.26 15.27486 Resident
598187.72 4141516.93 15.24487 Resident
598198.33 4141496.90 15.43488 Resident
598164.14 4141505.15 15.15489 Resident
598157.07 4141529.90 14.96490 Resident
598170.04 4141496.90 15.23491 Resident
598172.39 4141486.29 15.33492 Resident
598180.65 4141465.07 15.25493 Resident
598199.50 4141474.50 15.70494 Resident
598216.01 4141482.75 15.76495 Resident
598231.33 4141487.47 15.69496 Resident
598245.47 4141489.82 15.85497 Resident
598266.69 4141496.90 15.89498 Resident
598282.01 4141498.07 15.90499 Resident
598134.68 4141525.18 14.86500 Resident
598137.04 4141511.04 14.87501 Resident
598144.11 4141492.18 14.96502 Resident
598147.64 4141480.39 15.02503 Resident
598127.61 4141468.61 14.77504 Resident
598122.89 4141486.29 14.76505 Resident
598122.89 4141500.43 14.68506 Resident
598113.46 4141526.36 14.53507 Resident
598100.50 4141514.58 14.58508 Resident
598102.85 4141495.72 14.62509 Re sident
598109.93 4141478.04 14.72510 Resident
598112.28 4141465.07 14.71511 Resident
598095.78 4141461.54 14.71512 Resident
598085.17 4141481.57 14.63513 Resident
598080.46 4141501.61 14.55514 Resident
598078.10 4141514.58 14.45515 Resident
598053.35 4141505.15 14.70516 Resident
598059.24 4141491.00 14.71517 Resident
598063.96 4141475.68 14.69518 Resident
598069.85 4141459.18 14.59519 Resident
598050.99 4141455.64 14.81520 Resident
Appendix A
78
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598041.56 4141476.86 14.77521 Resident
598033.31 4141496.90 14.65522 Resident
598030.96 4141505.15 14.61523 Resident
597997.95 4141495.72 14.65524 Resident
598003.85 4141483.93 14.59525 Resident
598012.10 4141465.07 14.60526 Resident
598019.17 4141450.93 14.56527 Resident
598003.85 4141447.39 14.61528 Resident
597989.70 4141462.72 14.62529 Resident
597986.17 4141486.29 14.60530 Resident
597982.63 4141492.18 14.53531 Resident
597963.77 4141486.29 14.58532 Resident
597966.13 4141470.97 14.75533 Resident
597972.02 4141458.00 14.63534 Resident
597976.74 4141445.04 14.68535 Resident
598121.06 4141441.43 15.04536 Resident
598113.51 4141438.32 14.89537 Resident
598115.28 4141430.32 14.86538 Resident
598122.40 4141432.54 15.00539 Resident
598125.51 4141420.54 15.06540 Resident
598118.40 4141416.98 14.93541 Resident
598122.84 4141393.42 14.94542 Resident
598132.18 4141393.87 15.05543 Resident
598134.84 4141385.87 15.03544 Resident
598125.06 4141383.64 14.90545 Resident
598127.73 4141376.53 14.92546 Resident
598137.51 4141378.31 15.02547 Re sident
598091.28 4141433.43 14.66548 Resident
598089.50 4141426.32 14.59549 Resident
598079.72 4141428.99 14.59550 Resident
598080.61 4141418.32 14.52551 Resident
598067.27 4141426.32 14.56552 Resident
598067.27 4141416.98 14.48553 Resident
598059.27 4141423.65 14.54554 Resident
598059.27 4141416.98 14.46555 Resident
598050.83 4141421.87 14.52556 Resident
598051.27 4141409.43 14.38557 Resident
598035.71 4141418.32 14.36558 Resident
Appendix A
79
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598037.05 4141409.87 14.28559 Resident
598028.15 4141417.43 14.33560 Resident
598028.60 4141408.98 14.25561 Resident
598017.04 4141413.87 14.29562 Resident
598017.49 4141408.09 14.24563 Resident
598007.71 4141416.10 14.33564 Resident
598008.59 4141404.09 14.18565 Resident
597998.81 4141412.09 14.29566 Resident
598000.59 4141404.09 14.17567 Resident
598001.93 4141389.42 14.33568 Resident
598006.82 4141373.42 14.42569 Resident
598008.59 4141388.53 14.36570 Resident
598010.82 4141381.87 14.45571 Resident
598018.37 4141392.09 14.36572 Resident
598020.15 4141382.76 14.45573 Resident
598028.15 4141392.98 14.40574 Resident
598028.60 4141384.53 14.46575 Resident
598039.27 4141397.87 14.42576 Resident
598040.60 4141389.42 14.52577 Resident
598058.83 4141400.54 14.59578 Resident
598059.27 4141394.31 14.67579 Resident
598068.16 4141401.43 14.63580 Resident
598068.16 4141389.42 14.74581 Resident
598076.61 4141401.87 14.68582 Resident
598075.72 4141393.87 14.73583 Resident
598085.06 4141406.76 14.66584 Resident
598085.06 4141397.87 14.74585 Re sident
598094.39 4141408.54 14.70586 Resident
598098.39 4141398.31 14.81587 Resident
598101.95 4141385.42 14.75588 Resident
598103.28 4141374.75 14.71589 Resident
598092.61 4141383.64 14.71590 Resident
598093.06 4141372.53 14.65591 Resident
598081.50 4141384.53 14.71592 Resident
598081.94 4141372.09 14.59593 Resident
598070.39 4141380.09 14.68594 Resident
598070.83 4141371.64 14.55595 Resident
598055.27 4141376.98 14.59596 Resident
Appendix A
80
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598058.83 4141367.64 14.52597 Resident
598046.38 4141375.64 14.49598 Resident
598047.27 4141366.75 14.43599 Resident
598038.82 4141372.53 14.43600 Resident
598039.71 4141366.75 14.39601 Resident
598030.82 4141371.20 14.42602 Resident
598023.71 4141368.53 14.39603 Resident
598009.48 4141369.42 14.42604 Resident
598313.99 4141456.55 17.37605 Resident
598315.33 4141447.21 17.41606 Resident
598316.22 4141438.77 17.35607 Resident
598317.55 4141432.10 17.29608 Resident
598318.44 4141421.87 17.13609 Resident
598338.89 4141424.10 17.29610 Resident
598338.00 4141436.10 17.39611 Resident
598336.66 4141444.99 17.49612 Resident
598334.44 4141452.99 17.51613 Resident
598333.55 4141459.22 17.47614 Resident
598346.44 4141464.11 17.73615 Resident
598353.56 4141452.99 17.62616 Resident
598353.11 4141449.88 17.61617 Resident
598353.56 4141441.88 17.56618 Resident
598355.78 4141430.32 17.48619 Resident
598380.67 4141433.43 17.56620 Resident
598374.01 4141443.21 17.62621 Resident
598372.23 4141453.44 17.66622 Resident
598369.56 4141459.66 17.67623 Re sident
598368.23 4141466.33 17.71624 Resident
598386.90 4141469.88 17.92625 Resident
598385.12 4141461.88 17.89626 Resident
598390.45 4141456.10 17.82627 Resident
598390.90 4141449.44 17.76628 Resident
598391.34 4141439.66 17.66629 Resident
598429.57 4141445.88 17.85630 Resident
598428.24 4141456.10 17.97631 Resident
598428.24 4141462.33 17.98632 Resident
598423.79 4141471.66 18.04633 Resident
598424.24 4141479.22 18.04634 Resident
Appendix A
81
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
598318.88 4141406.76 17.09635 Resident
598322.44 4141406.76 17.15636 Resident
598328.66 4141408.09 17.19637 Resident
598336.66 4141408.54 17.26638 Resident
598344.22 4141411.21 17.36639 Resident
598351.33 4141412.98 17.42640 Resident
598360.67 4141413.43 17.47641 Resident
598364.67 4141417.43 17.48642 Resident
598374.89 4141417.43 17.52643 Resident
598379.78 4141421.87 17.54644 Resident
598390.90 4141421.87 17.61645 Resident
598401.57 4141427.65 17.66646 Resident
598407.79 4141429.88 17.74647 Resident
598018.82 4141497.45 14.60648 Resident
598019.26 4141485.00 14.61649 Resident
598022.82 4141473.00 14.67650 Resident
598029.04 4141455.21 14.70651 Resident
598045.05 4141464.99 14.84652 Resident
598038.38 4141488.56 14.70653 Resident
597990.37 4141474.33 14.64654 Resident
597993.04 4141452.10 14.62655 Resident
598159.74 4141518.34 15.10656 Resident
598188.63 4141508.12 15.27657 Resident
598253.98 4141492.11 15.90658 Resident
598078.83 4141463.22 14.61659 Resident
598074.83 4141478.33 14.65660 Resident
598069.50 4141495.67 14.67661 Re sident
598065.05 4141511.23 14.64662 Resident
598232.76 4141990.39 15.86663 Workers
598267.43 4142015.66 15.69664 Workers
598273.31 4142004.50 15.45665 Workers
598289.77 4141986.28 15.27666 Workers
598297.41 4141974.52 15.28667 Workers
598309.16 4141958.07 15.19668 Workers
598324.44 4141943.97 15.42669 Workers
598339.13 4141929.27 15.93670 Workers
598250.84 4142003.35 16.13671 Workers
597753.57 4141535.07 10.40672 Workers
Appendix A
82
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
597768.25 4141502.05 10.44673 Workers
598371.38 4142045.30 16.36674 Workers
598375.50 4142026.48 16.37675 Workers
Plant Boundary Receptors
Receptor Groups
Group DescriptionGroup IDRecord
Number
Workers Workers1
Resident Residents2
Appendix A
83
Meteorology Pathway
AERMOD
Met Input Data
Surface Met Data
Profile Met Data
..\MET data\SANJOSE13_17.SFC
Default AERMET format
Filename:
Format Type:
Filename:
Format Type:
..\MET data\SANJOSE13_17.PFL
Potential Temperature Profile
Base Elevation above MSL (for Primary Met Tower): 15.50 [m] Wind Direction
Rotation Adjustment [deg]:
Meteorological Station Data
Upper Air
Station No. Year Station Name
Surface
Stations X Coordinate [m] Y Coordinate [m]
2013
2013 OAKLAND/WSO AP
Default AERMET format
Wind Speed
Wind Speeds are Vector Mean (Not Scalar Means)
Data Period
Start Date: End Date:1/1/2013 12/31/2017Start Hour: End Hour: 241 Data Period to Process
10.8 8.23
5.14 3.09
1.54 No Upper Bound
Wind Speed [m/s]Stability CategoryWind Speed [m/s]
F
E
D
C
B
A
Stability Category
Wind Speed Categories
Appendix A
84 I I I I
Output Pathway
AERMOD
Tabular Printed Outputs
Short Term
Averaging
Period
RECTABLE
Highest Values Table
MAXTABLE
Maximum
Values Table
DAYTABLE
Daily
Values Table1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th
No1
Contour Plot Files (PLOTFILE)
Path for PLOTFILES: ConHRA2.AD
Averaging
Period
Source
Group ID
High
Value File Name
Period DPM DPM_PE.PLT
Period PM25 PM25_PE.PLT
Appendix A
85I I I
Results Summary
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
DPM Construction HRA
PM10 - Concentration - Source Group: DPM
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m)Units
PERIOD 0.01599 597965.95 4142098.36 10.91 0.00 10.91ug/m^3 PM10 - Concentration - Source Group: PM25
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m)Units
PERIOD 0.03698 597965.95 4142098.36 10.91 0.00 10.91ug/m^3 Appendix A
86
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Project
The health risk assessment (HRA) was conducted utilizing the American Meteorological Society/United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulatory Model (AERMOD) (Version 24142 and ARB’s Hot Spots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP2) Version 2 (22188 dated April 28, 2022) to automatically calculate risks for the projects using OEHHA promulgated cancer potency and reference exposure levels (RELs). HARP2 is the recommended model for calculating and presenting HRA results because it follows the district’s risk assessment guidance methodology and is consistent with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Bay Area Air District)’s Regulation 2-5. Since AERMOD was run with project emission rates to directly calculate potential DPM and PM2.5 concentrations, the Health Risk Assessment Standalone Tool (RAST) version of HARP2 was used.
The HRA follows the Bay Area Air District’s CEQA Guidelines based on OEHHA 2015 AB2588 Hot Spots Guidance. This risk assessment intake methodology addresses children’s greater sensitivity and health impacts from early exposure to carcinogenic compounds. The chemical intake or dose describing the frequency and duration of the exposure is estimated using receptor’s breathing rates, exposure duration, and exposure frequency. The calculations include the use of age-specific weighting factors, breathing rates, fraction of time at home, and reduced exposure durations.
The dispersion and exposure modeling is described below, including a summary of the HARP2 HRA inputs and cancer and noncancer risk results for selected for each receptor group (i.e., resident, off-site worker, and student).
AERMOD Inputs — The AERMOD software was utilized to predict the ground level concentrations resulting from the emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) (represented as PM10 exhaust) and total PM2.5 from associated with construction activities. The modeling utilized Urban dispersion coefficients and Bay Area Air District-provided meteorological data from the San José Mineta International Airport meteorological station (KSJC) from 2013 – 2017. The modeling included both emissions generated at the project site and those generated along the anticipated haul roads within approximately 1,000 feet of the site boundary. Diesel particulate emissions are characterized by an area source with a height of 5 meters to account for the height of the construction exhaust from the off-road equipment. Roadway emissions were modeled as line-volume sources or adjacent volume sources. PM2.5 emissions were modeled similarly, per the Bay Area Air District guidance which permits PM2.5 Dust to be modeled along with PM2.5 Exhaust.
Emissions were modeled only during the hours of 8 AM – 5 PM (with a one-hour break for lunch) Monday to Friday. DPM Emission rates were obtained from CalEEMod using emissions from PM10 exhaust from diesel vehicles and off-road construction equipment exhaust. PM2.5 emissions were calculated for the maximum annual period (first year of construction) and includes PM2.5 from off-road construction equipment exhaust, material handling as well as on-road exhaust, brake and tire wear, and re-entrained road dust.
Appendix A
87
Age Sensitivity Factors – Studies have shown that young animals are more sensitive than adult animals to exposure to many carcinogens.1 Therefore, OEHHA developed age sensitivity factors (ASFs) to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposures. Accordingly, the cancer risk methodology applies different ASFs by age groups. The ASFs utilized a 10-fold multiplier in sensitivity for the third trimester and infants less than age 2, a 3-fold increase in sensitivity for children ages 2 to 16 years old, and a sensitivity factor of 1 for ages 16 and older.
Daily breathing rates (age-specific daily air intake) – For residential receptors, the HRA utilizes the 95th percentile breathing rates for the most sensitive age groups (less than 2 years of age) and 80th percentile for all other age groups. This approach jointly developed by ARB and CAPCOA2 and adopted by theBay Area Air District 3 is referred to as the “Risk Management Policy” and was developed to consider the new science in risk assessment while providing a reasonable estimate of potential cancer risk for risk management decisions. and used in this HRA. The HRA uses 95th percentile 8-hour breathing rates for moderate intensity activities for worker and student exposure.4 Time at home – The time at home applies only applies to residential receptors. Residents are assumed to be at home 350 days per year, which assumes individuals are away for approximately 2 weeks of vacation. The fraction of time at home refers to the estimated amount of time residents stay at home during these 350 days. The HRA uses the OEHHA and BAAQMD recommended values of 73 percent time at home for 16-year-olds and above based on based on population and activity statistics. The HRA also assumes 100 percent time at home for receptors under age 16 to address exposures at local schools close to emitting sources. Even though infants and children may not be at their residence all the time, they are likely to remain in the neighborhood (at schools or neighbors) and would be exposed to similar levels of the pollutants.
Exposure Duration - OEHHA 2015 guidelines specify a 30-year residential exposure duration for estimating cancer risk at the maximum exposed individual resident (MEIR). This is based on studies showing that 30 years is a reasonable estimate of the 90th to 95th percentile of residency duration in the population. A 25-year standard exposure duration is the default to estimate cancer risk for off-site workers. However, risk assessors can use other exposure durations with proper justification and documentation. For example, short-term projects (e.g., construction projects) can now be evaluated for as short a duration as 6 months. The risks for the proposed project were assessed for the construction 1 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2009. Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors 200 . June 2009, http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/tsd052909.html) Accessed August 1, 2025 2 California Air Resources Board (ARB) and California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2015. Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources of Air Toxics. July 23. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/toxics/rma/rmgssat.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2025.
3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. California Environmental Quality Act – Air Quality Guidelines Appendix E:
Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards. Website:
https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa-guidelines-2022/appendix-e-recommended-methods-for- screening-and-modeling-local-risks-and-hazards_final-pdf.pdf?rev=b8917a27345a4a629fc18fc8650951e4&sc_lang=en. Accessed April 8, 2025.
4 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. The Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Website: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2025.
Appendix A
88
period from September 2025 to November 2026 over a construction schedule of 326 working days or
1.25 calendar years.
Residential Cancer Risk
Cancer risk for individual resident receptors exposed to DPM were calculated utilizing the “Risk Management Policy” option for inhalation, specifying that residents spend 100 percent time at home for ages less than 16 years old. Consistent with OEHHA guidance, the start of residential exposure was assumed to occur in the third trimester (-0.25 years) to accommodate the increased susceptibility of exposures in early life. As per OHEHHA and the Bay Area Air District guidelines, the residential exposure starts with the unborn child at the third trimester or –0.25 years (when construction begins) and continues until the child is 1 years of age. Because there are no significant sources of TAC emissions during operations, the exposure assessment is limited to the duration of the proposed project construction or 1.25 years.
Residential receptors included the nearest residences to the project site in all directions within the 1,000-foot zone from the project site.
Worker Cancer Risk
Cancer risk was calculated for the maximum impacted off-site worker based on the maximum DPM concentration at identified off-site receptors. HARP utilizes 8-hour breathing rates for moderate intensity activities of 240 L/kg-8 hrs (applicable to 16–30-year adults) to calculate the daily dose via the inhalation route to the worker. The analysis assumes a start age of 16 years and an exposure duration equivalent to the construction duration of 1.25 years.
The WAF is used to adjust the AERMOD estimated long-term concentration such that it is based only on the hours when the worker is present. For this project, assuming the emitting source and worker’s schedules are the same, the adjustment factor is 4.2 = (24 hours per day/8 hours per shift) x (7 days in a week/5 days in a work week).
Noncancer Chronic Health Risks
The potential non-cancer health impacts resulting from exposure to toxic substances usually lasting from one year to a lifetime. The total hazard index includes the sum of hazard indices for pollutants with non- cancer health effects that have the same or similar adverse health effects (endpoints). A chronic hazard index is calculated by dividing the annual average concentration of a toxic pollutant by the chronic reference exposure level for that pollutant.
5 Accordingly, the chronic non-cancer health index is derived by dividing the DPM concentration by the chronic REL of 5μg/m3.6 HARP2 Inputs and Results
5 California Air Resources Board. 2025. Emission Inventory and Risk Glossary. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/emission-inventory-and- risk-glossary-0. Accessed August 4, 2025.
6 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2025. Chemicals – Diesel Exhaust Particulate. Website:
https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals/diesel-exhaust-particulate. Accessed August 4, 2025.
Appendix A
89
HARP2 Output files are included to document the HRA exposure parameters and risk results.
HARP2 inputs and results are included for the following receptor/exposure scenarios for the Unmitigated emissions:
• Residential Cancer Risk – Maximum Exposed Individual Resident (MEIR) • Worker Cancer Risk – Maximum Exposed Individual Worker (MEIW)
Appendix A
90
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Project
Health Risk Summary of HARP2 Results
Resident Risks - DPM
Maximum Risk RISK_SUM Cancer Risk/million MAXHI NonCancer Chronic MAXHI Acute
8.64E-07 0.86433 0.000972 0
Maximally Exposed Individual Receptor
X Y
MEI UTM 598274.94 4141551.11
HARP File Name
*HARP - HRACalc v22118 7/16/2025 2:09:51 PM - Cancer Risk - Input File: F:\Jobs\18980015\ConHRA2\HARP2\MEIRHRAInput.hra RECEPTOR X Y CONC RISK_SUM SCENARIO CHRONIC HI
1 598274.94 4141551.11 0.00486 8.64E-07 1YrCancerDerived_Inh_FAH16to70 0.000972 Appendix A
91
HARP2 - HRACalc (dated 22118) 7/16/2025 2:09:51 PM - Output Log GLCs loaded successfully
Pollutants loaded successfully
**********************************
RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS
Receptor Type: Resident
Scenario: Cancer
Calculation Method: Derived
**********************************
EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER
Start Age: -0.25
Total Exposure Duration: 1
Exposure Duration Bin Distribution
3rd Trimester Bin: 0.25
0<2 Years Bin: 1
2<9 Years Bin: 0
2<16 Years Bin: 0
16<30 Years Bin: 0
16 to 70 Years Bin: 0
**********************************
PATHWAYS ENABLED
NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments.
Inhalation: True
Soil: False
Dermal: False
Mother's milk: False
Water: False
Fish: False
Homegrown crops: False
Beef: False
Dairy: False
Pig: False
Chicken: False
Egg: False
**********************************
INHALATION
Daily breathing rate: LongTerm24HR
**Worker Adjustment Factors**
Worker adjustment factors enabled: NO
**Fraction at time at home**
3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF
16 years to 70 years: ON
**********************************
TIER 2 SETTINGS
Tier2 adjustments were used in this assessment. Please see the input file for details.
Tier2 - What was changed: ED or start age changed|
Calculating cancer risk
Cancer risk saved to: F:\Jobs\18980015\ConHRA2\HARP2\MEIRCancerRisk.csv HRA ran successfully
Appendix A
92
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse Project
Health Risk Summary of HARP2 Results
Worker Risks - DPM
Maximum Risk RISK_SUM Cancer Risk/million MAXHI NonCancer Chronic MAXHI Acute
2.17E-07 0.21685 0.003198 0
Maximally Exposed Individual Receptor
X Y
MEI UTM 597965.95 4142098.36
HARP File Name
*HARP - HRACalc v22118 7/16/2025 2:19:09 PM - Cancer Risk - Input File: F:\Jobs\18980015\ConHRA2\HARP2\MEIWHRAInput.hra RECEPTOR X Y CONC RISK_SUM SCENARIO CHRONIC HI
1 597965.95 4142098.36 0.01599 2.17E-07 1.25YrCancerHighEnd_Inh 0.003198 Appendix A
93
HARP2 - HRACalc (dated 22118) 7/16/2025 2:19:09 PM - Output Log GLCs loaded successfully
Pollutants loaded successfully
**********************************
RISK SCENARIO SETTINGS
Receptor Type: Worker
Scenario: Cancer
Calculation Method: HighEnd
**********************************
EXPOSURE DURATION PARAMETERS FOR CANCER
Start Age: 16
Total Exposure Duration: 1.25
Exposure Duration Bin Distribution
3rd Trimester Bin: 0
0<2 Years Bin: 0
2<9 Years Bin: 0
2<16 Years Bin: 0
16<30 Years Bin: 1.25
16 to 70 Years Bin: 0
**********************************
PATHWAYS ENABLED
NOTE: Inhalation is always enabled and used for all assessments. The remaining pathways are only used for cancer and noncancer chronic assessments.
Inhalation: True
Soil: False
Dermal: False
Mother's milk: False
Water: False
Fish: False
Homegrown crops: False
Beef: False
Dairy: False
Pig: False
Chicken: False
Egg: False
**********************************
INHALATION
Daily breathing rate: Moderate8HR
**Worker Adjustment Factors**
NOTE: The worker adjustment factors below are only used for cancer assessments. However, the GLC adjustment factor is also applied to 8-hr noncancer chronic assessments.
Worker adjustments factors enabled: YES
GLC adjustment factor: 4.2
Exposure frequency: 250
**Fraction at time at home**
3rd Trimester to 16 years: OFF
16 years to 70 years: OFF
**********************************
TIER 2 SETTINGS
Tier2 adjustments were used in this assessment. Please see the input file for details.
Tier2 - What was changed: ED or start age changed|
Calculating cancer risk
Cancer risk saved to: F:\Jobs\18980015\ConHRA2\HARP2\MEIWCancerRisk.csv HRA ran successfully
Appendix A
94
/0 /1 /2 /3 /3 /4 /5 /4 /6 /i255 /8 /3 /9 /10 /2 /11
/12 /13 /14 /15 /i255 /17 /18 /i255 /19 /20 /21 /14 /13 /14 /22 /21 /i255 /23 /12/24/19/25 /i255 /19 /20 /18 /17 /13/26/15/21 /27 /17 /20 /28 /2 /3 /29 /i255 /30 /i255 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /32 /36 /37 /35 /38 /31 /i255 /39 /11 /40 /41 /42 /43 /i255 /44 /31 /i255 /35 /45 /35 /37 /i255 /44 /44/30 /46 /36 /30 /34 /36 /i255 /47 /29 /1 /5 /39 /5 /1 /i255 /48 /29 /49 /43 /5 /6 /50 /11 /i255 /51 /5/52/3 Appendix A
95 • • • •
Great Moll
Permitted Stationary Sources
Montruw \
Suh ror n '
0 0
0.05 19,028
0.1 O.Q7 0.15
0.2 mi
0.3 m
/0 /1/2/2/3/4 /5
/6 /7/8/9 /10 /11 /12 /13/14/15 /16 /9 /7 /17 /18 /14 /19/20/21 /9 /13 /22 /14 /23 /17 /18 /14 /20 /24 /25 /4/2/26/27 /27 /25 /28 /i255 /0/27 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31 /3 /4 /5 /i255 /0 /30 /1 /4 /32 /25/33/34 /35/36/37/35 /36 /37 /24 /25 /4/2/26/27 /27 /25 /28 /i255 /0 /27 /3 /27 /26/30 /31 /3 /4 /5 /i255 /0 /30 /1 /4 /32 /25 /33 /38 /15 /39 /39 /16 /9 /40/40/10 /7 /13 /41 /9 /16 /42 /43 /44/40/10 /23 /16 /11 /13 /44 /41 /42 /45/7/10 /44 /14/46/10 /11 /12 /13 /14/46 /47/48/49 /34 /i255 /50/26 /51 /4 /3 /52 /27 /3 /4 /i255 /53 /4 /26 /54/25/47 /55 /56/57/56 /55 /56/56/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /61/62/63 /57 /i255 /37/2/25/33 /i255 /37 /54 /25 /31 /1/25/56 /55 /56/56/56 /55 /56/47/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /57/62/63 /56 /i255 /37/2/25/33 /i255 /37 /54 /25 /31 /1/25/56 /55 /56/56/56 /55 /56/47/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /49/62/64 /49 /i255 /0/30 /i255/58/26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3 /33 /i255 /65 /52 /54/28/56 /55 /56/61/56 /55 /56/56/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /64/47/56 /47 /56 /i255/0 /30 /i255/58/26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3 /33 /i255 /65 /52 /54/28/56 /55 /56/56/56 /55 /56/56/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /63/62/57 /56 /i255 /37/2/25/33 /i255 /37 /54/25/56 /55 /56/63/56 /55 /56/56/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /34/48/56 /56 /i255 /37/2/25/33 /i255 /37 /54/25/61 /55 /57/47/56 /55 /56/47/58 /26/52 /59 /26 /27 /3/33/0 /3 /31 /27 /3 /i255 /60 /52 /3 /4 /3 /38 /66 /9 /14 /7 /44 /67/40/68 /7 /41 /44 /67 /44 /14 /46 /42/69/68 /7 /41 /44 /67 /44 /14 /46 /42/6/21 /7 /14 /44 /14 /12 /39/9/21 /11 /13 /22 /44 /14 /12/39 /9 /47/70 /71 /i255 /73/74 /75/74/34 /49 /49/47/76 /52 /25/77/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /61/70 /71 /i255 /73/74 /75/74/57 /47 /64 /63 /79/1/3 /52 /26 /27 /5 /i255 /80 /4 /3 /31 /33 /81 /30 /4/2/25/4 /i255 /82 /83 /52 /25 /32 /27 /4 /30 /31 /26 /32 /33/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /57/70 /71 /i255 /73/74 /75/74/47 /48 /57 /48 /48 /83 /54 /30 /84 /1 /3 /i255/85/3/27 /25 /4 /80 /25 /32 /86 /31 /30 /52 /30 /87 /26 /25 /33/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /49/70 /71 /i255 /73/74 /75/74/47 /62 /48 /49 /56 /88 /31 /26 /54 /25 /4 /33 /3 /52 /i255 /89 /31 /28 /1 /33 /27 /4 /26 /3 /52 /76 /26 /31 /26 /33 /86 /26 /31 /87/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /64/70 /71 /i255 /73/74 /75/74/61 /47 /47 /48/56/83 /32 /30 /i255/90/81/81 /26 /32 /25 /i255 /89 /31/32/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /63/50 /3/33 /i255 /53/26 /33 /59 /25 /31 /33 /26 /31 /87 /i255 /76 /3 /32 /26 /52 /26 /27/5/47 /56 /62 /63 /63 /48 /78/47/65 /3 /52 /32 /86 /i255 /24 /25 /27 /4 /30 /52 /25 /1/2/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /34/50 /3/33 /i255 /53/26 /33 /59 /25 /31 /33 /26 /31 /87 /i255 /76 /3 /32 /26 /52 /26 /27/5/47 /47 /56 /34 /48 /48 /78/47/76 /52 /5 /25 /4 /33 /i255 /91 /49 /56/47/57 /34 /55 /49/61/78 /47 /61 /47 /55 /48 /62 /38 /6 /15 /69 /10/92/6 /15 /69 /10 /92 /42 /69 /13 /39/12/6 /15 /69 /10 /92 /42 /92 /9 /41/14/6 /15 /69 /10 /92 /42 /92 /12 /93/40/94 /95/96/97 /47/57/57 /49 /61 /61/56
/98 /3 /28 /26 /30 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /80 /25 /52 /25 /54 /26 /33 /26 /30 /31 /65 /4 /30 /3 /28 /32 /3 /33 /27 /26 /31 /87 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /85/26/4 /25 /52 /25 /33 /33
/60 /30/2/2/1/31 /26 /32 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31 /33
/83 /84 /1 /26 /59/2/25/31 /27
/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87
/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/60 /30/2/59/1 /27 /25 /4 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /83 /52 /25 /32 /27 /4 /30 /31 /26 /32 /24 /4 /30 /28 /1 /32 /27 /i255/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/56 /55 /56 /61 /61/57/57 /64 /57 /47/47
/24 /30 /99 /25 /4 /100 /i255 /53 /26 /33 /27 /4 /26 /51 /1 /27 /26 /30 /31 /100 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /0 /59 /25 /32 /26 /3 /52 /27 /5 /i255 /80 /4 /3 /31 /33 /81 /30 /4/2/25/4 /58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87
/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87
/83 /52 /25 /32 /27 /4 /26 /32 /3 /52 /i255 /83 /84 /1 /26 /59/2/25/31 /27 /100 /37 /59 /59 /52 /26 /3 /31 /32 /25 /100 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /60 /30/2/59/30 /31 /25 /31 /27
/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87
/56 /55 /56 /56
/57/57/47 /61 /61 /61/62 /90/27/86 /25 /4 /i255 /80 /30 /51 /3 /32 /32 /30 /i255 /24 /4 /30 /28 /1 /32 /27 /58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/65 /25 /54 /25 /4 /3 /87 /25 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /80 /30 /51 /3 /32 /32 /30 /24 /4 /30 /28 /1 /32 /27 /i255/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/56 /55 /47 /61 /49/57/57 /61 /48 /47/61
/58/25/27 /3 /52 /i255 /60 /30 /3 /27 /26 /31 /87 /100
/83 /31 /87 /4 /3 /54 /26 /31 /87 /i255 /101 /25 /77 /32 /25 /59 /27 /102 /25 /99 /25 /52 /4 /5 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /0 /26 /52 /54 /25 /4 /99 /3 /4 /25 /103 /100 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /37 /52 /52 /26 /25 /28 /i255 /0 /25 /4 /54 /26 /32 /25 /33 /i255 /27 /30 /58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /25 /4 /33
/58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/76 /3 /51 /4 /26 /32 /3 /27 /25 /28 /i255/58/25/27 /3 /52 /i255 /24 /4 /30 /28 /1 /32 /27 /58/3/31 /1 /81 /3 /32 /27 /1 /4 /26 /31 /87/56 /55 /56 /56 /64/48/47 /47 /49 /61/56 /98 /25 /1 /59 /86 /30 /52 /33 /27 /25 /4 /5 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /76 /1 /4 /31 /26 /27 /1 /4 /25 /i255 /98 /25 /59 /3 /26 /4 /90/27/86 /25 /4 /i255 /0 /25 /4 /54 /26 /32 /25 /33 /i255 /101 /25 /77 /32 /25 /59 /27 /24 /1 /51 /52 /26 /32 /i255 /37 /28/2/26/31 /26 /33 /27 /4 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31 /103/98 /25 /59 /3 /26 /4 /i255 /3 /31 /28 /i255/58/3/26 /31 /27 /25 /31 /3 /31 /32/25/56/55 /56 /56 /63/49/49 /34 /47 /47/56 /50/3/33 /30 /52 /26 /31 /25 /i255 /0 /27 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31 /33 /i255 /99 /26 /27 /86 /60 /30 /31 /54 /25 /31 /26 /25 /31 /32 /25 /i255 /0 /27 /30 /4 /25 /33/98 /25 /27 /3 /26 /52 /i255 /80 /4 /3 /28/25/50 /3/33 /30 /52 /26 /31 /25 /i255 /0 /27 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31/33/56 /55 /56 /56 /34/49/61 /49 /34 /61 /56
/24 /25 /27 /4 /30 /52 /25 /1/2/i255/3 /31 /28
/24 /25 /27 /4 /30 /52 /25 /1/2/i255/24 /4 /30 /28 /1 /32 /27 /33 /58/25/4 /32 /86 /3 /31 /27 /i255/85/86/30 /52 /25 /33 /3 /52 /25 /4 /33 /101 /25 /77 /32 /25 /59 /27 /i255 /65 /1 /52 /104 /i255 /0 /27 /3 /27 /26 /30 /31 /33 /3 /31 /28 /i255 /80 /25 /4/2/26/31 /3 /52 /33 /103
/85/86/30 /52 /25 /33 /3 /52 /25 /i255 /80 /4 /3 /28 /25/58/25/4 /32 /86 /3 /31 /27 /i255/85/86/30 /52 /25 /33 /3 /52 /25 /4 /33 /100 /35 /30 /31 /28 /1 /4 /3 /51 /52 /25 /i255/50/30/30 /28 /33 /56 /55 /56 /56 Appendix A
96
/0/1 /2 /3 /2/4/5 /6/7/8 /9 /10 /11 /2
/12/13 /14/15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/19/13 /14/15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/18/13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/20/13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/16/13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/21/13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/22/13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18/16/12
/23/24/25/26 /27 /i255 /14 /i255 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /31 /i255 /34 /35 /36 /36 /33 /31 /i255 /37 /38 /30 /39 /i255 /12 /40 /17 /17 /17 /i255/41/30/42 /i255 /34 /33 /i255 /43 /30 /31 /31 /30 /39 /37 /33 /44 /i255 /44 /33 /45 /33 /39 /44 /46 /39 /32 /i255 /47 /39 /i255 /45 /31 /47 /48 /46/41/46/37 /42 /i255 /37 /47 /i255 /49 /46 /32 /39 /46 /36 /46 /50 /30 /39 /37 /i255 /49 /47 /35 /31 /50 /33 /49 /51 Appendix A
97
1000 Gibraltar Warehouse
Cumulative Health Risks from Roads and Rails
UTMX UTMY Road Cancer Risk Road Chronic HI Road PM2.5 Rail Cancer Risk 597966 4142098 5.724932671 0.017351089 0.121391229 0.340768605 Data Provided By: BAAQMD as raster file (.tif) datasets Roadway Screening Tool - Cancer Risk Last Updated December 8 2022 Roadway Screening Tool - Chronic Hazard Last Updated December 8 2022 Roadway Screening Tool - PM2.5 Last Updated December 8 2022 Rail Screening Tool - Cancer Risk Last Updated January 30 2023 Rail Screening Tool - Chronic Hazard Last Updated January 30 2023 Rail Screening Tool - PM2.5 Last Updated January 30 2023 Appendix A
98
Rail Chronic HI Rail PM2.5
9.15E-05 0.000430136
Appendix A
99
Climate Action Plan
Consistency Review
Checklist
Introduction
The City of Milpitas (City) adopted a Climate Action Plan Update (CAP Update) in 2022. The CAP Update outlines strategies and measures that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of State greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets. The purpose of the CAP Consistency Checklist (Checklist), in conjunction with the CAP Update, is to provide a streamlined review process for all proposed development projects that are subject to discretionary review and/or trigger environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Analysis of GHG emissions and potential climate change impacts from new development is required under CEQA. The City’s CAP Update is a qualified GHG emissions reduction plan in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of the CAP Update.
The purpose of this Checklist is to implement GHG reduction measures from the CAP Update that apply to new discretionary development projects. New development that demonstrates consistency with relevant CAP Update strategies and the City’s General Plan 2040 and would not conflict with the City’s ability to achieve the identified GHG reduction targets through implementation of applicable measures. Projects that are consistent with the CAP Update, as determined through the use of this Checklist, may rely on the CAP Update and its associated CEQA documentation for the cumulative impact analysis of GHG emissions. Projects that are not consistent with the CAP Update must prepare a comprehensive project-specific analysis of GHG emissions, including quantification of existing and projected GHG emissions and incorporation of the measures in this Checklist to the extent feasible. Projects that are unable to meet the requirements of this Checklist should look to alternative compliance approaches to GHG analyses using the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s CEQA Guidelines. Cumulative GHG impacts would be significant for any project that is not consistent with the CAP Update.
This Checklist may be updated periodically to incorporate new GHG reduction techniques or to comply with later amendments to the CAP Update or local, State, or federal law. Comprehensive updates to this Checklist will be coordinated with each subsequent CAP update. Administrative updates to the Checklist may occur regularly, as necessary for the purpose of keeping the Checklist up-to-date and implementable.
Appendix A
100
Applicability and Procedures
This Checklist is required only for discretionary projects1 that are subject to and not exempt from CEQA. Projects that are exempt from CEQA are deemed to be consistent with the City’s CAP Update, and no further review is necessary, with the exception of a Class 32 “In-Fill Development Projects” categorical exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332), for which projects are required to demonstrate consistency with the CAP Update through this Checklist.
General procedures for Checklist compliance and review are described below. Specific guidance is also provided under each of the questions in the Checklist. Project applican t completes the Checklist and submits to the City’s Planning Department as part of the project’s conditions of approval . Refer to the City’s Development Review Handbook
for details on the development review process.
The City’s Planning Department , Building Safety & Housing Department, and Public Works Department review the Checklist and make determinations regarding environmental review requirements under CEQA.
The specific applicable requirements outlined in the Checklist shall be required as conditions of project approval.
The project applicant must provide written documentation and supporting evidence that demonstrate how the proposed project would implement each applicable Checklist requirement described herein to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, Building Safety & Housing Department, and Public Works Department . If a measure is deemed not applicable for reasons other than those outlined in each question or if an exemption does not apply, supporting evidence will need to be provided by the project applicant and would be subject to Planning Department approval. A project may be determined to be inconsistent with the CAP Update if lack of compliance is deemed to be not supported by credible evidence. Development projects requiring discretionary review that cannot demonstrate consistency with the CAP Update using this Checklist shall prepare a separate, project-level GHG analysis as part of the CEQA documen t prepared for the project.
1 In this context, a project is any action that meets the definition of a “Project” in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Appendix A
101
Application Information
Contact Information
Project Name:
Property Address and
APN:
Applicant Name and
Co.:
Contact Phone:
Contact
Email:
Was a consultant retained to complete this checklist? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, complete the following:
Consultant Name:
Contact
Phone:
Company Name:
Contact
Email:
Project Information
1. What is the size of the project site (gross acres)?
2. What are the existing General Plan/zoning
designation(s) for the project site (as stated in the
Milpitas General Plan 2040)?
2. Identify all applicable proposed land uses:
☐ Residential (indicate # of single-family dwelling
units):
☐ Residential (indicate # of multi-family dwelling
units):
☐ Commercial (indicate total square footage):
☐ Industrial (indicate total square footage):
☐ Other (describe):
3. Provide a description of the project proposed. This description should match the basic project description used for the CEQA document. The description may be attached to the Checklist if there are space constraints.
SSD-SSJ1 - Milpitas
1000 Gibraltar Dr. Milpitas, CA 95035 (APN: 086-42-33)
CDP Development, Inc. - Todd Chandler
916-379-3105 [email protected] General Plan: MFG - Manufacturing
Zone: M2 - Heavy Industrial District
1,261,301 sq.ft.
1,261,301 sq.ft.
The proposed project would involve an addendum to the certified EIR for a 491,040-square foot warehouse on 1000 Gibraltar Drive in Milpitas, CA to develop a 487,564 square foot same-day fulfillment center and 7,844 quare foot office at the same project site.
Appendix A
102
General Plan Land Use Consistency
The first step in determining CAP Update consistency for a discretionary development project is to assess the project’s consistency with the land use assumptions in the Milpitas General Plan 2040 and zoning designations, which were used to calculate the future GHG emissions forecasts and targets for the CAP Update. If the proposed project is consistent with applicable General Plan and zoning designations, the proposed project may be determined to be within the scope of emissions covered under the CAP Update.
If the project is not consistent with the Milpitas General Plan 2040 and zoning designations, it is possible that the land use changes required for the project could still be consistent with the growth projections used in the CAP Update depending upon the level of proposed changes. The questions below must be completed, as applicable, to determine whether the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan 2040 and zoning designations and related GHG emissions forecasts and targets.
General Plan Land Use Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
1. Are the proposed land uses in the project consistent with the Milpitas General Plan 2040 land use and
zoning designations?
If “Yes” is selected, please skip to the CAP Measures
Consistency section of the checklist.
If “No” is selected, please proceed to question 2.
☐ ☐
2. Is a General Plan amendment and/or rezoning
required for the project?
If “No” is selected, please skip to the CAP Measures
Consistency section of the checklist.
If “Yes” is selected, please proceed to question 3.
☐ ☐
3. If the proposed project is not consistent with the
General Plan land use or zoning designations, does the
project include a land use plan and/or zoning
designation amendment that would result in an
equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when
compared to the existing designations?
If “Yes” is selected, please attach to this checklist the estimate project emissions under both existing and
proposed designation(s) for comparison. Compare the
maximum buildout of the existing designation and the
☐ ☐
Appendix A
103
General Plan Land Use Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
maximum buildout of the proposed designation. If the
proposed project is determined to result in an
equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when
compared to the existing designations, proceed to the
CAP Measures Consistency section of the checklist.
If “No” is selected, the applicant must conduct a full
GHG impact analysis for the project as part of the
CEQA process. The project shall incorporate each of
the applicable measures identified in the CAP Measures
Consistency section of the checklist to mitigate
cumulative GHG emissions impacts.
Appendix A
104
CAP Measures Consistency
The goal of the CAP consistency review process is to evaluate a project’s consistency with the applicable strategies and measures of the CAP Update and General Plan 2040. Each Checklist item is associated with a specific GHG reduction measure in the City’s CAP Update. “N/A” should only be checked based on the direction provided in each Checklist Item question. All projects for which the measure is applicable must demonstrate that they would implement measures consistent with the Checklist item, or fully substantiate how the item would be infeasible for project implementation. “N/A” responses are subject to Planning Department review and approval. If “No” is provided as a response to a question, the project would be determined to be inconsistent with the CAP Update and General Plan 2040 and result in a significant GHG impact.
CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
1. All-Electric New Buildings
(CAP Measure BE-2.1)
a) Will the project use electricity as the source of
energy for:
space heating,
water heating,
fireplaces,
electric vehicle charging
cooking appliances, and
clothes drying appliances?
☐ ☐
b) Will the project install natural gas infrastructure? If “No” is selected in question 1(a), please skip to
question 2(a).
☐ ☐
c) If the requirements above in questions 1(a)-(b)
cannot be met, will the project comply with 2022
Building Energy Efficiency Standards and install
electrical conduit and wiring sufficient to operate
electrical appliances?
☐ ☐
Appendix A
105
) )
CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
2. Clean Energy (CAP Measure BE-1.1)
a) Will the project install onsite renewable energy and storage systems capable of meeting anticipated
building energy consumption?
If “Yes” was selected in question 2(a), no further
answers are required.
☐ ☐
b) If “No” was selected in question 2(a), will the
project require residents/tenants/occupants to
participate in a group-buy solar and storage
program or opt in to Silicon Valley Clean Energy’s
carbon-free electricity option?
☐ ☐
c) Will the project include a parking structure?
If “No” was selected in question 2(c), no further
answers are required.
☐ ☐
d) If “Yes” was selected in question 2(c), will the
project install solar photovoltaics on the parking
structure if the structure is above ground?
☐ ☐
e) Will the project include heated swimming pools?
If “No” was selected in question 2(e), no further
answers are required.
☐ ☐
f) If “Yes” was selected in question 2(e), will the pool heaters be solar powered? ☐ ☐
g) If the requirements above in questions 2(b), (d),
and/or (f) cannot be met, do one of the following
exceptions apply?
Practical challenges to make satisfaction of the
requirements infeasible.
Alternate on-site renewable source used to
satisfy measure.
Procurement of renewable electricity.
Ground mounted solar installations as
voluntary alternative.
Excludes value of aesthetic exterior alterations
from permit valuation.
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
Appendix A
106
CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
Please substantiate answer selections for question 2:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
3. Sustainable Transportation and Land Use Planning
(CAP Measure TR-1.1)
a) Will the project achieve a 15 percent reduction in
per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) compared
to the baseline conditions as defined in the City’s
SB 743 guidelines?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 3:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
4. Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (CAP Measure TR-2.1) a) Will the project install electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure consistent with Chapter 19 of the
City’s Municipal Code (Green Buildings Standard
Code)?
☐ ☐
The roof top PV and exterior battery in compliance with California Energy Code requirements will be installed
The proposed project would locate a new delivery center closer to the user's customers, resulting in a reduction of 15,034 VMT per day in comparison to existing conditons. The reduction in overall delivery Total VMT per Capita that is below the City threshold of 14.91 for employment-generating projects. To mitigate impacts to commuter VMT, which currently are above City threshold at 16.42 per person, the VMT would outweigh the new VMT generated by commuter trips and line-haul truck trips, resulting in a proposed project would implement TDM strategies to reduce these impacts below City thresholds.
Appendix A
107
✓
CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
Please substantiate answer selections for question 4:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
5. Reduce Vehicle Idling (CAP Measure TR-2.3)
a) Will the project include loading docks? If “No” was
selected in question 5(a), no further answers are
required.
☐ ☐
b) If “Yes” was selected in question 5(a), will there be sufficient electrical power sufficient to support delivery trucks and associated equipment to reduce vehicle
idling when making deliveries?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 5:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
6. Active Transportation Options (CAP Measure TR-3.3)
a) Does the project include land uses other than
single-family residential? If “No” was selected in
question 6(a), no further answers are required.
☐ ☐
b) If “Yes” was selected in question 6(a), will short-
term and long-term bicycle parking facilities be
provided that comply with the City’s standards for
bicycle parking facilities?
☐ ☐
c) If the project included nonresidential development,
will the project provide “end-of-trip” facilities for
☐ ☐
Appendix A
108
) ) ) ) I)
CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer)
Yes No
bicyclists, including showers, secure bicycle lockers,
and changing spaces?
d) Will the project have e-bike and e-scooter
infrastructure and options? ☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 6:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
7. Waste Reduction (CAP Measure SW-1.1)
Will the project meet the requirements of SB 1383?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 7:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
8. Construction Demolition (CAP Measure SW-1.4)
a) Will the project reach a 75 percent diversion rate for construction and demolition waste?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 8:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
Question 6c: Project provides bicycle locker for long-term requirements per California Green Building Standards Code
Appendix A
109
)
) )
9. Landscape Equipment (CAP Measure OT-1.1)
a) Will the project install sufficient exterior electrical outlets to charge electric-powered landscaping
equipment?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 9:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
10. Water Conservation (CAP Measure WA-1.1)
a) Will the project install ultra-low-flow water fixtures? ☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 10:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
11. Landscaping (CAP Measure WA-1.2)
a) Will the project use drought-tolerant, water-
conserving, and/or native landscaping?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 11:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
12. Recycled Water (CAP Measure WA-1.3)
a) If the project is located along the city’s recycled water system (i.e., within the Transit Area Specific Plan
planning area), will the project use recycled water for landscape irrigation?
☐ ☐
Yes, ultra low-flow water fixtures will be installed for this project. New plumbing fixtures and fittings shall not exceed the maximum allowable flow rate specified in Table 5.303.2.2 (CALGREEN 5.303.2)
All plants are designated low water use per WUCOLS and/or native drought tolerant.
Appendix A
110
b) Will the project include a separate piping system for recycled water (i.e., “purple pipes”) for irrigation and outdoor water use?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 12:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
13. Heat Island Effect (CAP Measure CS-1.2)
a) Will the project install cool pavements?
☐ ☐
b) Will the project plant low-maintenance and
drought-tolerant landscaping? ☐ ☐
c) Will the project plant shade trees? ☐ ☐
d) Will the project include surface parking lot(s)? If
“No” was selected in question 13(d), no further
answers are required.
☐ ☐
e) If “Yes” was selected in question 13(d), will the
project reduce heat gain from surface parking
lot(s) by a minimum of 50% of the project site’s
hardscape?
☐ ☐
Please substantiate answer selections for question 13:
____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
14. Energy and Telecommunications Infrastructure (CAP
Adaptation Measure 2.5)
a) Will the project include new power and
telecommunications lines and/or transformers? If
“No” was selected in question 14(a), no further
answers are required.
☐ ☐
Landscape irrigation utilizes recycled/reclaimed water on a designated purple pipe system
Low maintenance, drought tolerant landscape specified for project. Shade trees with mature canopy widths fourty feet and greater have been added in all landscape islands of parking and around the perimeter of the parking area to provide shade and reduce Heat Island Effect. To meet a minimum of 50% requirement, we need to increase parking islands in the parking lot.
Appendix A
111
V
V
V
V