30 Metro
Tango Subdistrict Park
Project No.
20 23
Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of a new 5 -
acre City park within the Tango Subdistrict of the
Milpitas Metro Specific Plan area.
The park will expand Rapbone Park and be adjacent to Expedition Lane, Jubliee Lane, Sango Court, and Taro
b Court. The park may include benches, landscaping and irrigation system, pedestrian pathways, picnic areas, restroom, sports fields or courts, and other passive recreation facilities.
Notes
Augustus Rathbone Park (0.75 acres) was completed by K. Hovnanian Homes in 2017. The City purchased 1700 Sango Court (1.3
-
acres) and 1831 Tarob Court (2.5
-
acres) and needs to acquire 0.45 acres property on Sango Ct. (APN 86
-
036
-
011) to complete the land re
quirement for the park. The project will be coordinated with the S.
Milpitas Blvd. Road Extension
Project (
#
2016) and
Parkside West 2
Development (Toll Brothers) at 1901 Tarob Ct.
to construct the park and road network. On 3/19/2024, City Council approved a consultant agreement for master
planning of the park. On 6/17/2025, City Council approved the conceptual design of the park.
Workplan in
FY2025
-
26 and FY2026
-
27 is to complete CEQA
clearance
and the design of the
park
.
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 is for
the
project administration and
construction of the Project
, which is anticipated to start
in 202
8 after the
completion of Sango
Ct.
and S. Milpitas Blvd road extension. (TASP ID: DB#28).
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
900,000
40 0,000
0 0
0 0
1,
30 0,000
Administration
200,000
350
,000
0 0
0 0
55 0,000
Inspection
0 35
0,000
0 0
0 0
3 5
0,000
Improvements
0 9
,
5 00,000
0 0
0 0
9,500,000
TOTAL
$1,100,000
$10,600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,700,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
TASP Impact
Fees
1,100,000
10,600,000
0 0
0 0
1 1
,
7 00,000
TOTAL
$1,100,000
$10,600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,700,000
31 On
-
Call Parks and
Landscaping Services
Project No.
3463
Project Description
This project provides for
on
-
call maintenance and repair services at all City parks and street landscape areas.
Work may include, but is not limited to, repair and replacement of irrigation valves and main lines, irrigation controllers, landscaping, drainage, pathways, playground equipment and surfacing, sport courts and fields, picnic areas, lighting, parks buildings and restrooms, and other amenities as needed.
Notes
Funding request in FY
202
6 -
2 7
is for the various maintenance and repairs on
-
call service contracts related to the
City's park infrastructure.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
720,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,220,000
TOTAL
$720,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$1,220,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Community
Facilities
D
istrict
150,000
0 0
0 0
0 150,000
General
Government
CIP Fund
470,000
0 0
0 0
0 470,000
Park Fund
100,000
100,000
0 0
0 0
2 00,000
No Funding
Source
0 0
100,00
0 100,00
0 100,00
0 100,00
0 400,00
0 TOTAL
$720,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$1,220,000
32 Delano
Manongs Park
Project No.
5102
Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of a new 4 -
acre public park on McCandless Drive, adjacent to
the new Mabel Mattos elementary school, as specified in the Milpitas Metro Specific Plan.
The park includes joint
-
use area for the City and t
he elementary school, sport field, picnic areas, all
-
inclusive play areas, dog play area,
fitness stations, community and butterfly gardens, walking trails, and restroom.
Notes
City Council granted acceptance of Phase 1 improvements including picnic areas, play areas, small dog play area, fitness stations, community and butterfly gardens, pathways, restroom, utilities, landscaping, and irrigation system on 5/16/2023, and Phase 2
improvements of the sports field on 6/6/2023. Construction schedule for Phase 3 (large dog play area) will be coordinated with Lower Penitencia Creek Pedestrian Bridge (#2005) and McCandless Well (#7076) projects which is anticipated for 2027.
On 10/24/20
25, the City
entered
into a funding agreement
with D
epartment of Parks and Recreation’s Office of
Grants and Local Services
accepting the grant
funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program for portion of the
construction
cost
of Phase 3
.
(TASP ID: DB#22)
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
1,275,000
0 0
0 0
0 1,275,000
Administration
200,000
0 0
0 0
0 200,000
Inspection
200,000
0 0
0 0
0 200,000
Improvements
10,479,820
301,516
0 0
0 0
10,781,336
TOTAL
$12,154,820
$301,516
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,456,336
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
General
Government CIP
Fund
597,335
0 0
0 0
0 597,335
Grants/Reimb./
Developer Fees
1,182,485
301,516
0 0
0 0
1,484,001
TASP Impact Fees
10,375,000
0 0
0 0
0 10,375,000
TOTAL
$12,154,820
$301,516
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,456,336
33 Delano Manongs Soccer Field Turf
Replacement
Project No.
New
Project Description
This project
provide
s
for the design and replacement of
the existing natural grass with artificial
turf at the
Delano Manongs s
port
field. The natural grass field has experienced heavy use and requires ongoing maintenance to maintain playable conditions. Converting to artificial turf is being considered
a more
eƯective solution
to better support
the
demand, provide a more durable surface, and reduce long term maintenance needs.
Notes
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 is for the design. Planned funding in FY2027
-
28 is for the construction.
Estimated
Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 200,000
0 0
0 0
200,000
Administration
0 100,000
0 0
0 0
100,000
Inspection
0 0
50,000
0 0
0 50,000
Improvements
0 0
1,500,000
0 0
0 1,500,000
TOTAL
$0
$300,000
$1,550,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,850,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
TASP Impact
Fee
0 300,000
1,550,000
0 0
0 1,850,000
TOTAL
$0
$300,000
$1,550,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,850,000
34 Parks Pathway Improvement
Project No.
New
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement of existing
deteriorating
pathways at various parks as identified in the
adopted Master Plan Update dated December 14
, 2021.
W
ork includes replacement of the existing decomposed
granite or asphalt paving and header boards, regrading and replacement of aggregate base as needed, minor irrigation improvements, installation of root barriers, and maintenance of existing trees.
Notes
Funding Request in FY2026
-
27 is for the design and construction of the project.
Parks
pathway
s
currently
under
consideration for replacement include, subject to
available
funding, Ben Rodger
s
, Foothill Park
, Starlite, and
Sunnyhills Albert
Augustine Jr. Memorial.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Administration
0 100,000
0 0
0 0
100,000
Inspection
0 50,000
0 0
0 0
50 ,000
Improvements
0 850,00
0 0
0 0
0 850
,000
TOTAL
$0
$
1,0
00,000
$
0 $0
$0
$0
$1,
00 0,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Park Fund
0 1,0
00,000
0 0
0 0
1,
00 0,000
TOTAL
$0
$
1,0
00,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,
00 0,000
35
36 2027
-
31 Summary of Estimate Costs
No.
Project Name
Prior Year
FY
2026
-
27 FY
2027
-
28 FY
2028
-
29 FY
2029
-
30 FY
2030
-
31 Total
2001
Light Rail Median
Landscaping
5,996,000
0 0
0 0
0 5,996,000
2008
Montague Pedestrian
Overcrossing at
Piper
Dr.
875,000
0 0
0 0
0 875,000
2016
S Milpitas Blvd. Road
Extension
1 5
,700,000
0 0
0 0
0 1
5 ,700,000
2018
Montague Ped.
Overcrossing at
Penitencia
3,500,000
0 0
0 0
0 3
,
5 00,000
3402
McCarthy
Blvd.
LLMD
95 -
1 Improvements
1,260,256
0 75,000
75,00
0 75,000
75,00
0 1,
560,256
3411
Sinclair LLMD 98
-
1 Improvements
296,625
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
396,625
3425
Main St. Utility
Undergrounding
280,613
0 500,000
1,500,000
0 0
2 ,
2 80,613
3426
Annual Sidewalk Repair
Program
5,066,840
6 00,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
8,066,840
3430
Main St. Light Project
300,000
0 0
0 0
0 300
,000
3438
Annual Tree
Replacement Program
544,000
0 100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
944,000
3440
Streetlight, Signage,
TraƯic Signal
Improvements
4,314,432
1,0
00,000
1,000,000
1,000
,000
1,0
00,000
1,0
00,000
9,314,432
3449
Park & Street Landscape
Irrigation Improvements
806,000
0 50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
1,006,000
3455
Parking Prohibited
Street Sweeping
Program
400,000
0 0
0 0
0 400,000
3468
Median Conversion
Project
600,000
0 0
0 0
0 600,000
3493
Milpitas SMART
2,955,916
0 0
0 0
0 2,955,916
4258
Calaveras Blvd
Widening Project
5,106,960
0 0
0 0
0 5,106,960
4265
Bart Extension
Coordination & Planning
3,321,156
0 0
0 0
0 3,321,156
4267
Soundwall and Barrier
Improvements
1,388,466
0 100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,788,466
4274
I
-
880 Interchange
Right
-
of
-
Way Closeout
727,181
0 0
0 0
0 727,181
4283
ADA curb Transition
Program
3,370,801
4 00,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
5,
3 70,801
4288
TraƯic Studies & Safety
Improvements
620,000
150,000
0 150,000
0 150,000
1,
0 70,000
4290
City Bridge
Improvements
250,000
0 0
1 0
0,000
1 0
0,000
1 0
0,000
550
,000
4294
SR237 HOV Land
Improvements
550,000
0 0
0 0
0 550,000
37 4295
Street Pavement
Restriping Program
1,350,000
2 00,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
2,
7 50,000
4299
Bicycle Improvement
Project
1,000,000
0 0
0 0
0 1,000,000
4300
Street Resurfacing
Project 2024
-
25 4,597,562
0 0
0 0
0 4,597,562
4301
Hammond Way Street
Light Project
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 100,000
4302
Calaveras Road
Landslide Repair
500,000
0 0
0 0
0 500,000
4303
Street Resurfacing
Project 2021
-
22 4,337,276
0 0
0 0
0 4,337,276
4304
Street Resurfacing
Project 2022
-
23 4,377,050
0 0
0 0
0 4,377,050
4305
Street Resurfacing
Project 2023
-
24 5,090,490
0 0
0 0
0 5,090,490
4306
Bike and Pedestrian
Outreach
319,000
69,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
588,000
4307
Street Resurfacing
Project 2025
-
26 4,956,235
0 0
0 0
0 4,956,235
4308
Street Resurfacing
Project
2026
-
27 0
4,
566
,109
0 0
0 0
4,
566,
109
4309
Street Resurfacing
Project 2027
-
28 0
250
,000
4,400,000
0 0
0 4,
65 0,000
4312
SS4A
Improvement
Project
3,625,000
0 0
0 0
0 3,625,000
4314
HSIP TraƯic Safety
Improvement
381,900
1,911,800
0 0
0 0
2,293,700
Plan
Street Resurfacing
Project 2028
-
29 0
0 0
4,400,000
0 0
4,400,000
Plan
Street Resurfacing
Project 2029
-
30 0
0 0
0 4,400,000
0 4,400,000
New
Main Street
Signal
Improvement
s
0 500,000
0 0
0 0
500,000
New
Roadway
Preservation
Program
0 700,000
0 700,000
0 700,000
2,100,000
New
Street Resurfacing
Project 2030
-
31 0
0 0
0 0
4,400,000
4,400,000
Total Cost
$88,864,759
$10,
366
,909
$
7 ,595,000
$
9 ,
5 45,000
$7,195,000
$8,045,000
$131,
611,668
38 Sinclair LLMD 98
-
1 Improvements
Project No.
3411
Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of landscape and irrigation renovation along portions of Los Coches Street and Sinclair Frontage Road.
Work is part of the
Lighting, Landscape, Maintenance, Assessment
District (LLMD) 98
-
1. Notes
Funding request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for the annual contribution for the improvements of the LLMD. In FY2024 -
25,
Public Works completed the replacement of the irrigation controllers, improvements and upgrades of the irrigation system, and replanting of decaying vegetation.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
10,000
0 0
0 0
0 10,000
Administration
98,125
0 0
0 0
0 98,125
Inspection
6,000
0 0
0 0
0 6,000
Improvements
182,500
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
282,500
TOTAL
$296,625
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$396,625
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Grants/Reimb./
Developer Fees
85,750
0 0
0 0
0 85,750
LLMD
210,875
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
310,875
TOTAL
$296,625
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$396,625
39 Annual Sidewalk Repair Program
Project No.
3426
Project
Description
This project provides for repairs and replacement of citywide sidewalks, curb & gutter and curb ramps to address safety and trip hazards that may be caused by settlement, tree roots, and drainage issues. Prioritization of repairs and replacement are based
on service requests from the public and suggested routes to school which will minimize the City's risk and liability.
Notes
In FY2024
-
25, Public Works completed sidewalk repair
s
at approximately
703
locations.
On 2/17/2026, City
Council awarded
a construction contract for the annual sidewalk repairs, which is anticipated to be completed by Fall
2026.
Funding request in FY 202
6 -
2 7
is for the
annual
assessment
and
repair
and on
-
call service
contracts
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Administration
115,184
0 0
0 0
0 115,184
Improvements
4,951,656
6 00,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
7,951,656
TOTAL
$5,066,840
$
600
,000
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
$8,
066,840
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax Fund
3,774,605
6 00,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
600,000
6 ,
7 74
,
605
General Fund
125,000
0 0
0 0
0 125,000
General
Government CIP
Fund
603,640
0 0
0 0
0 603,640
Sewer Fund
203,200
0 0
0 0
0 203,200
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
260,395
0 0
0 0
0 260,395
Water Fund
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 100,000
TOTAL
$
5 ,
066
,
840
$
600
,000
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
$600,000
$
8 ,
0 66
,
840
40 Streetlight, Signage, TraƯic Signal
Improvements
Project No.
3440
Project Description
This project provides for repairs, replacement, and minor improvements of streetlights, street signage, and traffic signal control system.
Work includes replacement of various type of streetlights, street signage, and illuminated overhead street signs; upg
rades to traffic signal system including controllers & cabinets, detection cameras, cabinets, battery backup system and pedestrian safety devices; on -
call service repair contracts; and related
appurtenances.
Notes
Workplan in FY202
5 -
2 6
and FY2026
-
27 is
to continue the replacement of various
types
of streetlights and signage
;
upgrades to traffic signal intersections including detection cameras, and battery backup system; and conduct a traffic signal assessment. Funding request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for the annual on
-
call traffic signal repair contracts;
ongoing replacement of street signs and streetlights; upgrades to traffic signal intersections including controllers, detection cameras, cabinets, and battery backup system; and replacement of in tersection communication
equipment at Public Works building.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Administration
60,000
0 0
0 0
0 60,000
Improvements
3,760,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
8,760,000
Equipment
494,432
0 0
0 0
0 494,432
TOTAL
$4,314,432
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$
9,314,432
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax
Fund
3,694,432
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
8,694,432
General
Government CIP
Fund
500,000
0 0
0 0
0 500,000
Grants/Reimb./
Developer Fees
120,000
0 0
0 0
0 120,000
TOTAL
$4,314,432
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$9,314,432
41 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Program
Project No.
4283
Project Description
This mandatory program is for the replacement of existing curb ramps to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) current standards. The project allows the City to be eligible for future Federal transportation aid funds such as TDA Article III. The
curb ramp improvements will be coordinated and implemented with the annual Street Resurfacing project. Work also includes push button upgrades, crosswalk striping, signage, and sidewalk improvement associate with curb ramps. The target completion date for
citywide ADA public street curb ramp
compliance is 2040.
Notes
In 2025,
15 curb ramps
were
upgraded in conjunction with Street Resurfacing Project 2023 -
24 -
Phase 2(#4305). In
2026,
approximately 40
curb ramps are planned to be upgraded in conjunction with Gr e
at Mall Parkw
a
y Phase
2 Street Resurfacing
Project
(
#
4300
)
and
Street Resurfacing
Project
20 26 (
#
4307)
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
90,000
0 0
0 0
0 90
,000
Administration
90,000
0 0
0 0
0 90
,000
Inspection
150,000
0 0
0 0
0 150,000
Improvements
3,162,152
40 0,000
40 0,000
40 0,000
40 0,000
40 0,000
5,
162
,152
TOTAL
$3,
49 2,152
$
4 00,000
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$5,
49 2,152
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax Fund
2,740,000
400
,000
244
,000
3 20,000
3 20,000
3 20,000
4,
344
,000
Grants/Reimb./
Developer Fees
281,351
0 0
0 0
0 281,351
TDA Article III
470,801
0 156
,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
866,
801
TOTAL
$
3,492,152
$
4 00,000
$
4 00,000
$
4 00,000
$
4 00,000
$
4 00,000
$
5 ,
49 2,152
42 TraƯic Studies & Safety Improvements
Project No.
4288
Project Description
This project provides for citywide traffic studies, safety and minor traffic improvements as described in the
citywide Travel Safety Plan and from community service requests.
Traffic studies may include, but are not limited
to, data collection including vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian counts, level of service analysis, speed surve ys,
traffic flow and safety assessment and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis.
Minor traffic and safety improvements may include, but are not limited to, traffic signal improvements including emergency vehicle preemption, pedestrian signals, signal cabinets
and heads upgrades, and signal timing and
phasing/turning movements; pedestrian improvements including bulb -
outs, fencing, guardrails, intersection and
crosswalk striping, and flashing beacons;
roadway improvements including advanced stop bars, green bike
and
buffer lanes, high
-
friction pavement treatments, lighting, radar feedback signs, retroreflective signage, rumble strips, and striping and marking.
Notes
In FY2024
-
25, staff completed an assessment of signal timing at Carnegie Dr. and traffic data collection at 96
locations
to support speed limit posting
certification
.
Workplan in FY2025
-
26 is to
continue developing traffic
safety mitigation and improvement
measures
al
ong Escuela Parkway, McCandless D
r.
, and Abbott Ave. Funding
request in FY2026
-
27 is for
continued planning of the traffic safety improvements as identified in the adopted Citywide Traffic Safety Plan
and
traffic
studies
conducted in response to
community service requests.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
240,000
100
,000
0 100
,000
0 100
,000
5 40,000
Administration
20,000
0 0
0 0
0 20,000
Improvements
360,000
50 ,000
0 50
,000
0 50
,000
51 0,000
TOTAL
$620,000
$150,000
$
0 $150,000
$
0 $150,000
$1,
0 70,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax Fund
200,000
150,000
0 150,000
0 150,000
6 50,000
Street
Improvement
Fund
420,000
0 0
0 0
0 420,000
TOTAL
$620,000
$150,000
$
0 $150,000
$
0 $150,000
$1,
0 70,000
43 Street Pavement Restriping Program
Project No.
4295
Project Description
This project provides for the
improvement, restriping, and replacement of pavement markings on City's paved roadways in accordance with California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The program will provide guidance and information, and improve roadway safety for motori sts, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Work
includes minor repairs to asphalt pavement; restriping of existing pavement legends, lane lines, and crosswalks; placement of markers; and respond to public requests through MyMilpitas App.
Notes
On 6/3/2025, the City Council granted acceptance for the street restriping of North and South Milpitas Blvd., Evans/Piedmont Road, Dixon Landing/Dixon Road, and Marylinn Dr. from North Abel St. to North Main St.
Workplan is FY2025
-
26 is to restripe Yosemite Drive.
Funding request in FY202
6 -
27 is for on
-
call service repair
contracts; restriping in school zones, high traffic areas and main thorough -
fares; and responding to public
requests received through the MyMilpitas App.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Administration
40,000
0 0
0 0
0 40,000
Improvements
1,310,000
2 00,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
2,
7 10,000
TOTAL
1,350,000
$
2 00,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$2,
7 50,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax Fund
1,05
0,000
2 00,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
2,
4 5
0,000
General
Government CIP
Fund
300,000
0 0
0 0
0 300,000
TOTAL
$1,
35 0,000
$
2 00,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
$2,
7 50
,000
44 Bike and Pedestrian Outreach
Project No.
4306
Project Description
This project provides for the public outreach activities to promote, educate, and encourage bicycling and walking in support of the circulation policy goals of the City's 2040 General Plan and Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan.
The Valley Transpor
tation Authority (VTA) adopted and established a 2016 Measure B Bike and Pedestrian Education and Encouragement Program. They distributed based funding on a population -
based formula to eligible
cities that encourages the use of bicycles and walking for tra nsportation rather than motorized vehicles.
Notes
On 6/1/202
1 , City Council approved a Master Agreement with VTA for the 2016 Measure B Bike and Pedestrian Education and
Encouragement Program
, and an
amendment extending the agreement term to March 31, 2047
on
5/6/2025.
In FY 2025
–
26, staff advanced bicycle education and outreach by presenting program goals to City commissions, producing educational videos, and hosting bicycle safety classes and workshops at major events like the Holi Festival and Earth Day to engage resi
dents and promote safe, sustainable
transportation.
Funding
request in FY 2026
–
27 is
the anticipated annual funding from Measure B
for
continuing
community outreach,
educational programming, and promotional activities
to
encourage safe bicycling, reduce emissions, and advance the City’s long
-
term mobility and sustainability goals.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Administration
319
,000
69,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
588,000
TOTAL
$
319
,000
$69,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$588,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Measure B
319,000
69,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
588,000
TOTAL
$319,000
$69,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$588,000
45 Street Resurfacing Project 2026
-
27 Project No.
4308
Project Description
This project provides for the repair, rehabilitation, and/or reconstruction of roadway pavement. Streets are selected for
improvement based on a Pavement Management System to optimize the pavement condition rating and use of funding. Locations and streets may vary dependent on the City’s needs and funding. There are currently 129 center lane miles of streets that are owned by
the City. The project will include replacement and upgrade of curb, gutter, driveway, sidewalk, installation of ADA ramps, and installation of Class II bike lanes and Class III bike route facilities as described in the adopted 2022 Trail, Pedestrian and B icycle Master Plan.
Notes
Funding request
in FY2026
-
27 is to resurface various street
s
including
Hillview Dr., from Paseo Refugio Dr. to
Tramway Dr., Alcosta Dr., Anacapa Ct., Canada Dr., Las Lomas Dr., Los Positos Dr., Pacheco Dr., Tassajara Road, Terra Bella Dr., Valencia Dr., Aberdeen Way/Ct., Angus Dr., Clyde Ct., Dundee Ave., Glasgow Ct., Loch Lomond Ct., Los Pinos Ave., Paseo Refugio Dr., Santa Rita Dr. from Tramway Dr. to Paseo Refugio Dr., Shelley Ct., Shetland Ct., Troon Ct., Ayer St., Park
Brook Ct., Park Glen Ct., Park Grove Dr., Park Heights Dr., Park Hill Dr., Park Oak Ct., Park View Dr., Park Willow Ct.,
South Park Victoria Dr
.
from Calaveras Blvd. to Yosemite Dr
.,
and
from
Yellowstone
Ave
.
to Landess Ave
.,
Yosemite Dr
.
,
from Sequoia Dr
.
to Piedmont Road
,
Bryce C
t.,
Zion Ct
.,
Cervantez C
t.,
Camarillo C
t
, and Fox Hollow Ct
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
25 0
,000
10 0
,000
0 0
0 0
3 5
0 ,000
Administration
0 150,000
0 0
0 0
150,000
Inspection
0 100,000
0 0
0 0
100,000
Improvements
0 4,
2 1
6,109
0 0
0 0
4,
2 1
6,109
TOTAL
$
250,000
$4,
56 6,109
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,
8 1
6,109
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax
250,00
0 0
0 0
0 0
25 0,000
Measure B
0 2,066,109
0 0
0 0
2,066,109
SB 1 RMRA
0 2,000,000
0 0
0 0
2,000,000
Vehicle
Registration Fee
0 500,000
0 0
0 0
500,000
TOTAL
$
250,000
$4,
56 6
,109
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,
8 16
,109
46 Street Resurfacing Project 2027
-
28 Project No.
4309
Project Description
This project provides for the repair, rehabilitation, and/or reconstruction of roadway pavement. Streets are selected for improvement based on a Pavement Management System to optimize the pavement condition rating
and use of funding. Locations and streets may vary dependent on the City’s needs and funding. There are currently 129 center lane miles of streets that are owned by the City. The project will include replacement and upgrade of curb, gutter
, driveway, sidewalk, installation of ADA ramps, and installation of Class II bike lanes and Class III bike route facilities as described in the adopted 2022 Trail, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan.
Notes
Streets under consideration for resurfacing, but subject to change, are
on
N. Abbott Ave. from Redwood Ave. to
Heath St. and adjacent streets.
Funding request
in
FY2026
-
27 is for the design phase.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 250
,000
0 0
0 0
250
,000
Administration
0 0
150,000
0 0
0 150,000
Inspection
0 0
100,000
0 0
0 100,000
Improvements
0 0
4,150,000
0 0
0 4,150,000
TOTAL
$0
$
250
,000
$4,400,000
$0
$0
$0
$4,
650
,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax
0 250
,000
0 0
0 0
25 0,000
Measure B
0 0
1,900,000
0 0
0 1,900,000
SB 1 RMRA
0 0
2,000,000
0 0
0 2,000,000
Vehicle
Registration Fee
0 0
500,000
0 0
0 500,000
TOTAL
$0
$
250
,000
$4,400,000
$0
$0
$0
$4,
650
,000
47 HSIP TraƯic Safety Improvement
Project No.
4314
Project Description
This project provides for the design and installation of retroreflective backplates and the implementation of Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPI) at all
72 City
-
owned
traffic signal
intersections
;
enhance
the
visibility
with
signage, daylighting and beacons of
three unsignalized intersection
at
McCarthy B
oulevard
and Murphy Ranch
R
oad,
Kennedy Dr
ive
and N
.
Park Victoria
Drive and
N
.
Temple Dr
ive
and Golden Hills Dr
ive, with
signage,
daylighting and beacons
;
and imp
rove the horizontal curve along North McCarthy Boulevard ,
south of the Milpitas
and
Fremont city boundary.
Notes
In February 2025, the City was awarded
a
grant
in the amount of $2M
from the Local Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 12.
In November 2025, the City entered into a program supplement agreement with Caltrans
for
the P
roject design and administration. Workplan in FY2025
-
26 and FY2026
-
27 is to begin the
design, which is
anticipated to be completed by 2027
.
Funding request
in FY2026
-
27 is for the
construction of the
P
roject
, which is
anticipated to
be authorized in 2027 and
begin in 2028.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
300,000
0 0
0 0
0 300,000
Administration
81,900
200,000
0 0
0 0
281,900
Improvements
0 1,711,800
0 0
0 0
1,711,800
TOTAL
$381,900
$1,911,800
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,293,700
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax
38,190
191,180
0 0
0 0
229,370
Grant
343,710
1,720,620
0 0
0 0
2,064,300
TOTAL
$381,900
$1,911,800
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,293,670
48 Main Street
Signal Improvements
Project No.
New
Project Description
This project provides for the design and
replacement of outdated traffic signal hardware
, including
upgra
des to
non
-
ADA
-
compliant pedestrian push buttons and traffic signal hardware ,
at five (5) signalized intersections along
Main Street, from Carlo Street to Great Mall Parkway
.
Notes
This project was awarded $500k earmark from Federal Community Project Funding as part of the House Appropriations Committee fiscal year 2024 bill signed by the President on March 12,
2024.
Workplan in
FY2025
-
26 and
FY2026
-
27 is to complete Caltrans E
-
76 and
obligate the funds by 9/30/2027. Funding request in FY2026 -
27 is
for the design and improvement of the Project
, which is anticipated to be completed in 2028.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 100,000
0 0
0 0
100,000
Administration
0 70
,000
0 0
0 0
7 0,000
Inspection
0 30,00
0 0
0 0
0 30,00
0 Improvements
0 300,000
0 0
0 0
300,000
TOTAL
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Grant
0 $500,000
0 0
0 0
500,000
TOTAL
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
49 Roadway
Preservation
Program
Project No.
New
Project Description
The pro
gram
provides for the ongoing maintenance and
preservation of the City’s roadway network to maintain
pavement conditions at an acceptable Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and extend the useful life of existing streets. Work typically includes preventative maintenance treatments such as slurry seal, cape
seal, crack
sealing, and localized pavement repairs.
The program focuses on timely, cost
-
effective preservation strategies that slow pavement deterioration, reduce the need for more costly rehabilitation or reconstruction, and support safe and reliable travel for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.
Notes
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 is for the implementation of the
P
ro
gram
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
0 7
00,000
0 7
00,000
0 7
00,000
2,100
,000
TOTAL
$0
$700,000
$0
$700,000
$0
$700,000
$2,100,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Gas Tax
0 700,000
0 700,000
0 700,000
2,100,000
TOTAL
$0
$700,000
$0
$700,000
$0
$700,000
$2,100,000
50
51 2027
-
31 Summary of Estimate Costs
No.
Project Name
Prior Year
FY
2026
-
27 FY
2027
-
28 FY
2028
-
29 FY
2029
-
30 FY
2030
-
31 Total
2002
2nd SCVWD Water
Reservoir & Pump
Station
200,000
0 0
0 3,800,000
9,800,000
13,800,000
2009
SCVWD Second
Water Supply Turnout
100,000
0 0
0 0
532,000
632,000
2019
(Rmb) Metro
Potable
and Recycle Water
Distribution
605,000
350,000
0 0
0 800,000
1,
755,
000
2020
SCVWD Zone 1
Pressure Red. Valve
100,000
0 0
0 0
430,000
530,000
7076
Well Upgrade Program
15,990,000
0 0
0 0
0 15,990,000
7100
Aging Water
System/Seismic
Improvements
4,382,781
0 0
0 0
0 4,382,781
7110
Hydrant Replacement
Program
1,036,360
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
2,036,360
7112
Reservoir Cleaning
Program
840,000
0 0
100,000
0 0
940,000
7118
Dempsey Road Water
Line Replacement
7,857,772
0 0
0 0
0 7,857,772
7126
Water Conservation
Program
1,985,000
0 100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
2,385,000
7127
Supervisory Control &
Data Acquisition
6,716,600
0 200,000
0 0
0 6,916,600
7133
Minor Water Projects
3,946,000
0 100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
4,346,000
7135
Water Leak
Detection
& Condition
Assessment Program
631,474
0 100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,031,474
7137
On
-
Call Water
Maintenance & Repair
Services
1,925,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
3,675,000
7140
Cross Connection
Control
Program
1,150,000
0 200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
1,950,000
7141
Asset Renewal and
Replacement
Program
1,685,000
0 1,685,000
1,685,000
1,685,000
1,685,000
8,425,000
7144
Pipeline & Facility
Condition
Assessment
-
250,000
250,000
2,240,000
0 0
2,740,000
7146
Fire Flow
Interconnection
Improvements
-
260,000
712,000
0 0
480,000
1,452,000
7147
Pinewood Well
Facility Rehabilitation
Project
500,000
0 0
2,200,000
0 0
2,700,000
7148
Pressure Reducing
Facilities
Relocation
Project
465,000
0 1,580,000
0 0
0 2,045,000
7149
Sunnyhills Turnout
Rehabilitation Project
1,165,000
0 0
0 0
0 1,165,000
52 7150
Fire Flow Pipeline
Improvement
-
Phase 1
750,000
2,005,000
0 0
0 0
2,755,000
Plan
Risk and
Resiliency
Improvements
135,000
0 0
2,000,000
0 0
2,135,000
Plan
Fire Flow Pipeline
Improvements
-
0 1,470,000
0 240,000
405,000
2,115,000
New
Fire Flow Pipeline
Improvement
-
Phase
2 -
360,000
980,000
0 0
0 1,340,000
Total Cost
$52,165,987
$3,
775
,00
$7,927,00
$9,275,000
$6,775,000
$15,182,000
$9
5,099,987
53 (Rmb)
Metro
Potable
and Recycle Water
System Distribution
Project No.
2019
Project Description
This project
provides
for the
reimbursement to developers for the construction of
potable or
recycled water
system in the Metro Specific Plan area. This project is the City’s effort to diversify the water supply system and offset the use of potable water with recycled water mainly for irrigation purposes. New mains will be installed along Great Ma
ll Pkwy., E. Capitol Ave., Montague Expy., S. Milpitas Blvd., Main St., McCandless Dr., Sango Ct., Tarob Ct., and Piper/Montague subdistrict
.
In addition, this project includes upgrades to the
City’s aging potable
water system to ensure it can meet both current demands and anticipated needs from future development.
Notes
City reimbursed Lennar $599,609 for 1,500 feet of recycled water line on Great Mall Parkway in 2019. On 6/20/2023, City Council approved a fee reimbursement of $605k to Sango Court, L.P. for the construction of 8" recycled water main on Sango Ct. from the
Cul
-
De
-
Sac to Montague Expressway at 355 Sango Ct. project.
Potential future reimbursement for plan segments
includes
(1) 350 feet on Montague Expy. between Houret Dr.
and McCandless Dr.; (2) 3,000 feet on Main St. between Montague Expy. and Great Mall Pky .; and (3) 200 feet on
Montague Expy. between Pecten Ct. and Watson Ct.
Funding request
in
FY2026
-
27 is for the reimbursement of
water main extension on Tarob Ct. as part of the Tolls Brother Development -
Geomax I
(TASP ID: DB#21)
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
605,000
350
,000
0 0
0 $800,000
1,755,000
TOTAL
$1,036,360
$
350
,000
$
0 $
0 $
0 $
800,000
$
1,755
,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
TASP Impact
Fees
605,000
350
,000
0 0
0 $800,000
1,755,000
TOTAL
$
650,000
$
350
,000
$
0 $
0 $
0 $
800,000
$
1,755,000
54 Hydrant Replacement Program
Project No.
71 1
0 Project Description
This project provides for
replacement of citywide hydrants and related infrastructure as recommended in the 2021 Water Master Plan. The City
maintains approximately 2,900 fire hydrants which typically have a service life of 30 years.
Notes
On 3/18/2025, City Council authorized the purchase of 30 hydrants and valves,
and the issuance of additional
purchase orders as needed for a period of up to five years. Workplan in FY202 5 -
26 is for operation staff to replace
hydrants that are knocked down, aging or pose potential risks. Funding request in FY202 6 -
2 7
is for the purchase
and replacement of 30 hydrants and valves to meet the annual replacement goal.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
10,000
0 0
0 0
0 10,000
Administration
5,000
0 0
0 0
0 5,000
Inspection
10,000
0 0
0 0
0 10,000
Improvements
1,011,360
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
2 ,
011
,
360
TOTAL
$1,036,360
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$
2 ,
036
,
360
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
344,260
0 0
0 0
0 344,260
Water Line
Extension Fund
692,100
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
1,692,100
TOTAL
$1,036,360
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$2,036,360
55 On
-
Call Water Maintenance & Repair
Services
Project No.
7137
Project Description
This project provides for on
-
call maintenance and repair services of the City's water infrastructure. Work may include, but is not limited to, the repair and
replacement of electrical and mechanical systems (VFD & generators), motors and pumps, pipelines, meters, aboveground/underground storage tanks, and other related improvements.
All work will be performed on a priority and funding availability basis.
Notes
Funding request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for on
-
call maintenance and repair contracts related to the City's water infrastructure.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
1,925,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
3 ,
675
,000
TOTAL
$1,925,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$
3 ,
675
,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
1,697,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
3 ,
447
,000
Water Line
Extension Fund
228,000
0 0
0 0
0 228,000
TOTAL
$1,925,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$3,675,000
56 Pipeline & Facility Condition Assessment
Project No.
7144
Project Description
This project provides for a condition assessment of the City’s water facilities and pipeline distribution system to manage infrastructure risk before failure as recommended per the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021.
The assessment for pipel
ines will focus on metallic and asbestos cement material segments including
appurtenances such as air valves, blow off assemblies, fire hydrants, and valves to document estimate remaining useful life; and, for facilities will focus on interties, PRVs, pump ing stations, reservoirs, turnouts, and
wells that are identified as Level B and C facilities.
Notes
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 and p
lanned funding
requests
in FY2027
-
28 and FY2028
-
29 are
fo
r
pipeline
and
facilities
assessment
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 225,000
225,000
0 0
0 450,000
Administration
0 25,000
25,000
0 0
0 50,000
Improvements
0 0
0 2,240,00
0 0
0 2,240,00
TOTAL
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$2,240,000
$0
$0
$2,740,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
0 250,000
250,000
2,240,000
0 0
2,740,000
TOTAL
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$2,240,000
$0
$0
$2,740,000
57 Fire Flow Interconnection Improvements
Project No.
7146
Project Description
This project provides for the design and installation of new emergency PRVs as recommended per the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021.
There are several locations where fire hydrants cannot deliver the recommended fire flow while maintaining
a 20 psi residual system pressure. Installation of PRVs will improve fire flows under normal operations and provide redundancy.
The project includes the replacement
and installation
of
three
PRV
s at Hammond Way
(ECIP
-
V
-
01)
,
Cedar (BCIP
-
V
-
01)
and
the end o
f Corning Ave (ECIP
-
V
-
02)
and one
isolation valves at Co
elho (ECIP
-
V
-
03)
.
Notes
F
unding request in FY2026
-
27 is for
the planning and design of the Project. Planned funding request in
FY2027
-
28 is for the construction of
ECIP
-
V
-
01, ECIP
-
V
-
02 and BCIP
-
V
-
01. Planned funding request i
n
FY2030
-
31 is for ECIP
-
V
-
03. Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 1
75 ,000
0 0
0 0
1 75
,000
Administration
0 70
,000
0 0
0 0
70 ,000
Inspection
0 15,00
0 0
0 0
0 15
,000
Improvements
0 0
712
,000
0 0
480,000
1,192
000
TOTAL
$0
$260,000
$712,000
$0
$0
$480,000
$1,452,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
0 260,000
712,000
0 0
480,000
1,452,000
TOTAL
$0
$260,000
$712,000
$0
$0
$480,000
$1,452,000
58 Fire Flow Pipeline Improvement Phase 1
Project No.
7150
Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of the
upsizing
of
water mains
, identified as
ID ECIP
-
PI
-
05,
06, 07, 08, 10, 11, 16
in the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021,
to deliver the recommended fire
flow at surrounding fire hydrants
.
According to the City’s potable water design guidelines and the State's recommendations, the City’s water system shall provide minimum standard fire flow rate for a required duration while maintaining at least 20 pounds per square inch (psi) residua l pressure during a fire flow event.
Notes
Workplan in
FY2025
-
26 is
to
complete the
design
by
winter 2027.
F
unding request in FY2026
-
27 is for the
construction
,
which is anticipated to start in 2027
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
600,000
0 0
0 0
0 600,000
Administration
150,000
0 0
0 0
0 150,000
Inspection
0 75
,000
0 0
0 0
75 ,000
Improvements
0 1,930
,000
0 0
0 0
1 ,930
,000
TOTAL
$750,000
$2,005,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,755,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
750,000
2,005,000
0 0
0 0
2,005,000
TOTAL
$750,000
$2,005,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,755,000
59 Fire Flow Pipeline
Improvement Phase 2
Project No.
New
Project Description
This project provides
for the design and construction of
the
upsizing
of
water mains
, identified as
ID ECIP
-
PI
-
21,
23, 25, 26 in the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021, to deliver the recommended fire flow at
surrounding fire hydrants
.
According to the City’s potable water design guidelines and the State's recommendations, the City’s water system shall provide minimum standard fire flow rate for a required duration while maintaining at least 20 pounds per square inch (psi) residual press ure during a fire flow event.
Notes
Funding request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for the
design of
p
hase 2
,
which is anticipated to be completed in 2027.
Planned
f
unding request in FY202
7 -
28 is for the construction of
the Projec
t, which is anticipated to start in 2028.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 2
40,000
0 0
0 0
2 40,000
Administration
0 90
,000
0 0
0 0
9 0,000
Inspection
0 30,00
0 0
0 0
0 3
0,000
Improvements
0 0
9 8
0,000
0 0
0 9
8 0,000
TOTAL
$0
$360,000
$980,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,340,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Water Capital
Surcharge
0 360,000
980,000
0 0
0 1,340,000
TOTAL
$0
$360,000
$980,000
0 0
0 $1,340,000
60
61 2027
-
31 Summary of Estimate Costs
No.
Project
Name
Prior Year
FY
2026
-
27 FY
2027
-
28 FY
2028
-
29 FY
2029
-
30 FY
2030
-
31 Total
6118
SJ/SC regional Waste
Water Facility
99,464,245
2,471,000
8,755,971
6,826,087
6,257,022
16,361,116
140,135,441
6124
Sewer Pump Station
Rehabilitation Program
2,852,000
300,000
0 0
0 0
3,152,000
6126
Minor Sewer Projects
313,000
0 50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
513,000
6134
On
-
Call Sewer
Maintenance & Repair
Services
465,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
965,000
6135
Sanitary Sewer
CCTV
Inspections &
Improvements
1,617,996
666,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
3,615,996
6136
Sanitary Sewer
Pipeline Improvements
-
0 2,912,000
1,365,000
1,915,000
6,681,000
12,873,000
6137
Forcemain "A" Project
2,940,000
0 23,200,000
0 0
0 26,140,000
6138
Sanitary Sewer
Pipeline Improvement
-
Phase 1
266,000
730,000
0 0
0 0
996,000
New
Sanitary Sewer
Pipeline Improvement
Phase 2
-
347,000
1,070,000
0 0
0 1,417,000
Total Cost
$107,918,241
$
4,614,000
$
36,420,971
$
8,674,087
$
8,655,022
$
23,525,116
$
189,807,437
62 SJ/SC Regional Waste Water
Facility
Project No.
6118
Project Description
The City pumps sewage to the San Jose/Santa Clara Regional Waste Water Facility for waste water treatment
before it can be discharged into the San Francisco Bay.
The facility was originally constructed in 1956 and is
reaching the end of its useful life.
The City of San Jose, who operates the facility, is undergoing an estimated $2 billion rehabilitat
ion project to completely overhaul the facility over the next 30 years.
The City of Milpitas uses
approximately 7%, which equals to approximately $140 million of the cost of improvements over the next 30 years.
This project funds Milpitas’ share of the reh
abilitation costs.
Notes
Funding request in FY202
6 -
27 and planned funding request from FY202
7 -
2 8
to FY20
30 -
31 are based on Water
Pollution Control 2026
-
2030 Draft Capital Improvement Program.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
99,464,245
2,471,000
8,755,971
6,826,087
6,257,022
16,361,116
14 0,135,441
TOTAL
$99,464,245
$
2,471,000
$8,755,971
$6,826,087
$6,257,022
$16,361,116
$
14 0,135,441
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer Fund
21,765,000
0 0
0 0
0 21,765,000
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
22,649,245
0 8,755,971
6,826,087
6,257,022
16,361,116
60,849,441
Sewer
Treatment Fund
19,550,000
2,471,000
0 0
0 0
22,021,000
Wastewater
Revenue Bonds
35,500,000
0 0
0 0
0 35,500,000
TOTAL
$99,464,245
$
2,471,000
$8,755,971
$6,826,087
$6,257,022
$16,361,116
$
14 0,135,441
63 Sewer Pump Station Rehabilitation
Program
Project No.
61 2
4 Project
Description
This project provides for facility improvements and upgrades at the Main and Venus Wastewater Lift Stations to improve the resiliency of the system and ensure that sewage will continue to be pumped out of the City to the San Jose Regional Treatment Plan.
Work may include, but not limited to, rotational assessment of the wastewater pumps and peripheral equipment rehabilitation; replacement of electrical control, flow meters and equipment, variable frequency drives (VFD), and grinders; upgrades and repairs t o pipelines, valves and facilities amenities,
etc.
Notes
In FY2024
-
25, Public Works completed the replacement of two grinders at Main Lift Pump Station.
On 11/19/2024,
City Council approved the replacement of grinders, which was
completed in 2025. Workplan in FY2025
-
26 and
FY2026
-
27 is to replace or repair grinder(s) and VFD(s),
prepare
the design for the installation of Vactor Truck
Disposal Facility, and the replacement of the air release valves along Forcemain "B" and magnetic flow meters at the Main Lift Station. Funding request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for the annual replacement of grinders and VFDs
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 100,000
Administration
175,000
0 0
0 0
0 175,000
Improvements
2,477,000
300,000
0 0
0 0
2,
7 77,000
Equipment
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 100,000
TOTAL
$2,852,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
3,1
52,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
2,852,000
300,000
0 0
0 0
3,1
52,00
TOTAL
$2,852,000
$
300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
3,1
52,000
64 On
-
Call Sewer Maintenance &
Repair Services
Project No.
6134
Project Description
This project provides for
on
-
call maintenance and repair services of the City's sewer infrastructure. Work may include, but is not limited to, repair and replacement of electrical and mechanical systems (VFD & generators), motors and pumps, pipelines, and other related improvement s. All work will be performed on a priority and
funding availability basis.
Notes
Funding request
in FY2026
-
27 is for on
-
call maintenance and repair contracts related to the city's sewer infrastructure.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
465,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
965,000
TOTAL
$465,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$965,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer Fund
74,000
0 0
0 0
0 74,000
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
391,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
891,000
TOTAL
$465,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$965,000
65 Sanitary Sewer
CCTV Inspection &
Improvements
Project No.
6135
Project Description
This project provides for
Closed
-
Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of medium to extreme risk 24 -
inch diameter
or greater sewer pipelines and to repair defects discovered during the inspection as recommended per the adopted Sewer Master Plan, dated August 2021.
The Master Plan in
cludes an inspection map (figure 9
-
3) of the
highest priority areas which totals 55,000 feet.
Notes
On 10/1/2024, City Council approved a fee reimbursement agreement with the developer of the 1355 California Circle Project for sanitary sewer sectional liner improvements , which was completed in spring 2025
. Funding
request in FY202
6 -
2 7
is for the ongoing CCTV inspection of pipelines greater than 24" and repair pipeline defects discovered during inspections.
CCTV inspections is anticipated to start
in
2026
.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
1,617,996
666,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
3 ,
615
,
996
TOTAL
$1,617,996
$666,000
$333,000
$333,000
$333,000
$333,000
$
3 ,
615
,
996
Funding
Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
1,617,996
666,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
333,000
3,615,996
TOTAL
$1,617,996
$666,000
$333,000
$333,000
$333,000
$333,000
$3,615,996
66 Sanitary Sewer Pipeline
Improvement
-
Phase 1
Project No.
613
8 Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of sewer pipe segments with significant defects and considered extreme risk with the greatest likelihood of deterioration and the highest consequence of failure
,
identified as PI 1
-
5 in
the adopted Sewer Master Plan, dated August 2021. The sewer renewal and replacement study in the Master Plan identifies several pipelines that are considered extreme risk of failure based on CCTV inspection, structural rating, susceptibility to liquefact ion, pipe obstruction, age, and material type.
Notes
Work plan in FY2025
-
26 is to
complete the
design
by
winter
2027. F
unding request
in FY2026
-
27 is for
construction
, which is anticipated to start in 2027.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
166,000
0 0
0 0
0 166,000
Administration
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 100,000
Inspection
0 2
0,000
0 0
0 0
2 0,000
Improvements
0 71
0,000
0 0
0 0
71 0,000
TOTAL
$266,000
$730,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
996
,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
266,000
730,000
0 0
0 0
996,000
TOTAL
$266,000
$730,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$996,000
67 Sanitary Sewer Pipeline
Improvement Phase 2
Project No.
NEW
Project Description
This project provides for the design and construction of sewer pipe segments with significant defects and
considered extreme risk with the greatest likelihood of deterioration and the highest consequence of failure ,
identified as PI
6 -
10 in
the adopted Sewer Master Plan, dated August 2021. The sewer renewal and replacement study in the Master Plan identifies several pipelines that are considered extreme risk of failure based on CCTV inspection, structural rating, susceptibility to liquefact ion, pipe obstruction, age, and material type.
Notes
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 is for the
design
, which is anticipated to be completed in 2027.
Planned funding
request in FY202
7 -
28 is for the constructio
n
, which is anticipated to start in 2028.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 260
,000
0 0
0 0
260
,000
Administration
0 87
,000
0 0
0 0
87 ,000
Inspection
0 0
30,000
0 0
0 30,000
Improvements
0 0
1,040,000
0 0
0 1,040,000
TOTAL
$0
$347,000
$1,070,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,417,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Sewer
Infrastructure
Fund
0 347,000
1,070,000
0 0
0 1,417,000
TOTAL
$0
$347,000
$1,070,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,417,000
68
69 2027
-
31 Summary of Estimate Costs
No.
Project Name
Prior Year
FY
2026
-
27 FY
2027
-
28 FY
2028
-
29 FY
2029
-
30 FY
2030
-
31 Total
3714
Flap Gate Replacement
500,000
0 400,000
0 0
0 900,000
3715
Storm Drain
System
Rehabilitation
2,616,410
0 0
0 0
0 2,616,410
3719
On
-
Call Storm Maintenance
& Repair Services
245,000
100,000
0 0
0 0
345,000
3724
Main Street Flood Study
250,000
0 1,799,843
0 0
0 2,
049,843
3725
Technology Drive Utilities
and Road
Improvement
4,600,000
0 0
0 0
0 4,600,000
New
Citywide Green
Stormwater
Infrastructure
Improvement
-
200,000
0 0
0 0
200,000
Total Cost
$8,211,410
$300,000
$2,199,843
$0
$0
$0
$10,711,253
70 On
-
Call Storm Maintenance &
Repair
Services
Project No.
3719
Project Description
This project provides for on
-
call maintenance and repair services of all City storm infrastructure, assets, and
appurtenances. Work may include, but is not limited to, repair and replacement of electrical and mechanical
systems (VFD & generators), motors and pumps, pipelines, aboveground/underground storage tanks, and other
related improvements. All work will be performed on a priority and funding availability basis.
Notes
Workplan in FY2025
-
26 and FY2026
-
27 is for on
-
call maintenance and repair contracts related to the city's storm drain infrastructure as needed.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Improvements
245,000
100,000
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL
$
245,000
$
1 00,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
General
Government
CIP Fund
145,000
0 0
0 0
0 145,000
Strom Drain
General Fund
100,000
100,000
200,000
TOTAL
245,000
$
1 00,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
345
,000
71 Citywide Green
Stormwater
Infrastructure Improvement
Project No.
New
Project Description
The project provides for the feasibility study, design and implementation of the Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) to reduce the storm water pollutant loads, control runoff volumes, and improve water quality in the local waterways. Under Municipal Regi
onal Stormwater Permit (MRP) 3.0, Provision C.3.j, SCVURPPP requires approximately 46.09 acres of impervious surface across the County of Santa Clara to be retrofitted with GSI during th
is
permit term. The City of Milpitas is required
to design and retrofi
t
5.0 acres
of impervious area
by June 30,
2027.
Notes
Funding request in FY2026
-
27 is for the feasibility study and design.
Estimated Cost
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Design
0 150,000
0 0
0 0
150,000
Administration
0 50,000
0 0
0 0
50,000
Inspection
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Improvements
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 TOTAL
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
Funding Source
Phase
Prior Year
FY2026
-
27 FY2027
-
28 FY2028
-
29 FY2029
-
30 FY2030
-
31 Total
Storm Drain
General
Fund
0 200,000
0 0
0 0
200,000
TOTAL
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
72 Planned Projects Without Funding
"Planned Projects Without Funding” section identifies long -
term infrastructure needs in the City. These
projects are not included within the 5
-
year Capital Budget and are considered as lower priority, funding is not available or have an implementation sche
dule of 6 years and beyond. Projects will be considered annually to move within the 5
-
year budget cycle based on project priority and available funding.
Project Categories
Ex. Infrastructure
Repair/Replacement
Backlog
New
Infrastructure
Total
Community Improvement
$32,800,000
$220,550,000
$253,350,000
Park Improvement
$5,680,000
$66,820,000
$72,500,000
Street Improvement
$9,000,000
$125,900,000
$134,900,000
Water Improvement
$54,000,000
0 $54,000,000
Sewer Improvement
$61,600,000
0 $61,600,000
Strom Improvement
$57,800,000
0 $57,800,000
TOTAL
$220,880,000
$413,270,000
$634,150,000
73 Planned Project Without Funding
Community Improvements
Fire Station No. 1 Building and Site Improvement
Estimated Cost: $7.0M
This project provides for the building and site improvements at FS No. 1.
The mechanical, lighting, roof, and window systems, and the site pavement, have reached the end of their
service life.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2020
Computer
-
Aided Dispatch Replacement
Estimated Cost: $3.
5 M
The project provides for the design and replacement of the Computer -
Aided Dispatch system, which has exceeded its service life.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Police/Information Technology Facility/PW Buildings Improvement
Estimated Cost: $200M
This project provides for the design and construction of a new PD/IT facility at a new site and the renovation of the
existing facility for PW
operation. Various elements of the building have reached the end of their service life or are not in compliance with code.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2020
Fire Station No. 3 Replacement
Estimated Cost: $20.0M
This
project provides for the design and construction of a new Fire Station No. 3, which has reached the end of its service life.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2016
Police Firearms Range Improvements
Estimated Cost: $1.0M
This project provides for
improvements to the Police Firearms Range in
Alameda County.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2024
Energy Management System Upgrades at PD/PW Building & City Hall
Estimated Cost: $3.0M
This project provides for the replacement and upgrades of the Energy
Management System (EMS) at City Hall and the PD/PW Building.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2021
Metro Community Facility Building
Estimated Cost: $16.2M
This project provides for the design and construction of a new satellite community center/recreation facility within the Milpitas Metro Specific Plan area.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2019
Planned Project Without Funding
Community Improvements (continued)
Railroad Quiet Zone Feasibility Study
Estimated Cost: $300k
74 The project provides for a feasibility study of the Railroad Quiet Zone along portions of the UPRR Warm Springs corridor within the City of Milpitas.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2021
Citywide Fuel Storage Tank Improvements
Estimated Cost: $1.0M
The Project provides for the assessment, repairs, and replacement of 27 underground and above
ground storage fuel tanks with capacities ranging
from 400 to 10,000 gallons.
Project added to
the CIP
on July 1, 2025
Public Works Parking Facility Improvements
Estimated Cost: $850k
The Project provides for design and expansion of parking facilities at the City of Milpitas Public Works Department
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2026
75 Planned Project Without Funding
Park Improvements
Higuera Adobe Caretaker Cottage Renovation
Estimated Cost: $200k
This project provides for the interior and exterior restoration of the Higuera Adobe Park caretaker cottage.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2016
Ben Rogers Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $4.3M
This project
provides for the design and construction of improvements at Ben Rogers Park. Improvements may include picnic and playground areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscaping, site furnishing replacement, and restroom installat ion.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Calle Oriente Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $460k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Calle Oriente Park. Improvements may include landscape and irrigation renovation, and site lighting replacement.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Calaveras Ridge Park
Estimated Cost: $1.7M
This project provides for the design and construction of a new park on a City
-
owned parcel on Calaveras Ridge Drive. The
park may include ADA
pathways, landscaping, irrigation, picnic areas, and improvements to interpretive displays.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2018
Cardoza Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $340k
This project provides for the design and
construction of improvements at
Cardoza Park. Improvements may include picnic areas, ADA access and pathways, irrigation and landscaping, site furnishing replacement, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Dixon Landing
Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $4.1M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Dixon Landing Park. Improvements may include picnic and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, site furnishing replacement, parking lot
improvements, sport court and field upgrades, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Foothill Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $2.4M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Foothill Park. Improvements may include picnic and playground areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscaping, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
76 Planned Project Without Funding
Park Improvements (continued)
Hall Memorial Renovation
Estimated Cost: $5.0M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Hall Memorial Park. Improvements may include picnic and playground areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian
lighting, irrigation and
landscaping, utilities, site furnishing replacement, parking lot improvements, sport court upgrades, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Hidden Lake Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $1.8M
This
project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Hidden Lake Park. Improvements may include picnic areas, ADA access, pathways, lighting, irrigation, landscaping and shade tree installation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Hillcrest Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $2.8M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Hillcrest Park. Improvements may include open space and picnic areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscaping, utility improvements, site furnishing r
eplacement, and restroom
installation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
John McDermott Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $520k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at
John McDermott Park. Improvements may include open space, picnic and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, replacement of site furnishings, and restroom renovations.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Milpitas Sports
Center Complex Improvements
Estimated Cost: $3.5M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at the Milpitas Sport Center Complex. Improvements may include ADA and vehicular access and pathways, storm drainage
improvements, irrigation
and landscaping, sport field amenities, and site furnishing replacement.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2020
Murphy Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $4.6M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at
the Milpitas Sport Center Complex. Improvements may include ADA and vehicular access and pathways, storm drainage improvements, irrigation and landscaping, sport field amenities, and site furnishing replacement.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2009
77 Planned Project Without Funding
Park Improvements (continued)
Oliver W. Jones Memorial Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $1.75M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Oliver W. Jones Memorial Park.
Improvements may include open space
and picnic areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscaping, utility improvements, site furnishing replacement, and restroom installation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Parc Metro Central Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $370k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Parc Metro Central Park. Improvements may include open space and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, and replacement of site furnishings.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Parc Metro East Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $580k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Parc Metro East Park. Improvements may include open
space and
playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, replacement of site furnishings, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Parc Metro West Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $700k
This project provides for the design
and construction of improvements at
Parc Metro West Park. Improvements may include open space and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, replacement of site furnishings, and restroom renovation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Pecot (Bob) Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $630k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Pecot Park. Improvements may include ADA access and pathways, irrigation and landscaping, and the installation and replacement of site furnishings.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Pinewood Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $180k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Pinewood Park. Improvements may include restroom renovations and a playground area.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
78 Planned Project Without Funding
Park Improvements (continued)
Rose Garden with Children’s Memorial
Estimated Cost: $300k
This project provides for the design and construction of a Rose Garden at
a suitable location. Work includes landscaping, irrigation, hardscaping, a children's memorial monument, and community outreach.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Selwyn Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $800k
This project
provides for the design and construction of improvements at Selwyn Park. Improvements may include picnic and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, and replacement of site furnishings.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Peter D. Gill
Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $4.0M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Peter D. Gill Memorial Park. Improvements may include open space, picnic and playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, replacement of
site furnishings, parking lot improvements, sport court and field upgrades, and restroom renovations.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Robert E. Browne Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $3.5M
This project provides for the
design and construction of improvements at
Robert E. Browne Park. Improvements may include open space, picnic and playground areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, utilities, irrigation and landscaping, site furnishings replacement, sport cou
rt upgrades, and restroom installation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Sinnott Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $4.0M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Sinnott Park. Improvements may include open
space, playgrounds and
picnic areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscaping, utility improvements, replacement of site furnishings, installation of a sport court, and restroom upgrades.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2015
Starlite Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $3.45M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Starlite Park. Improvements may include open space, playgrounds, and picnic areas; ADA access and pathways;
irrigation and landscaping; utility
improvements; site furnishings replacement; and restroom renovations.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2015
79 Planned Project Without Funding
Park Improvements (continued)
Sunnyhills Albert Augustine Jr.
Memorial Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $5.6M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Sunnyhills Albert Augustine J. Memorial Park. Improvements may include open space, playground, and picnic areas, ADA access and pathways, pedestrian lighting, irrigation and landscapi
ng, utility improvements, site
furnishing replacement, parking lot improvements, and restroom upgrades.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Strickroth Park Renovation
Estimated Cost: $5.0M
This
project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Strickroth Park. Improvements may include open space, playgrounds, and picnic areas; ADA access and pathways; pedestrian lighting; irrigation and landscaping; utility improvements; site fu
rnishings replacement; parking
lot improvements; and restroom installation.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Tom Evatt Park Improvements
Estimated Cost: $270k
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at Tom
Evatt Park. Improvements may include playground areas, irrigation and landscaping, and replacement of site furnishings.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2022
Sports Center Synthetic Fields Replacement
Estimated Cost: $2.65M
This project
provides for the replacement of the synthetic football and soccer fields at the Sports Center Complex, installed in 2016. Life expectancy field is approximately 15 years.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2021
Cardoza Park/Dixon Landing Parks Improvements
Estimated Cost: $
7M
This project provides for
installation of 4 softball fields at Cardoza
Park/Dixon Landing.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 202
6
80 Planned Project Without Funding
Street Improvements
TraƯic Signal Installation
Estimated Cost: $700k
This project provides for the design and construction of a new traƯic signal system. Possible locations include Milpitas Blvd. & Tramway Dr., S.
Park Victoria Dr. & Mt. Shasta Ave., N. Park Victoria Dr. & Kennedy Dr., and elsewhere.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2008
Trail Amenity Improvements
Estimated Cost: $3.9M
This project provides for the design and construction of trailhead amenities in the short term, as identified as a high priority and feasibility category in
the adopted Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan, dated May 2022.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Montague Expressway Widening
–
West
Estimated Cost: $20.2M
This project provides for the City's fair share contribution to the County for streetscape improvements and widening the road on Montague Expy from Great Mall Pkwy to S. Main St. The fair share goal from TASP Impact Fees for streetscape and widening improvement is estimated at $12.3M (DB#6) and $7.9M (DB#2), respectively.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2019
Railroad Ct. Bridge Replacement
Estimated Cost: $5.0M
This project provides for the design and replacement of the vehicle bridge at Railroad Court as recommended in the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program report
dated April 20, 2022, at Cornerstone.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Gill Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement
Estimated Cost: $4.0M
This project provides for the design and replacement of 4 pedestrian bridges over Tularcitos Creek at
Canada Dr., Alcosta Dr., Pacheco Dr., and
Terra Bella adjacent to Gill Park, as recommended in the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program report dated April 20, 2022, at Cornerstone.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Pedestrian Short
-
Term
Improvements
Estimated Cost: $54.7M
This project provides for the design and construction of short -
term
pedestrian improvements, identified as a high priority and in the feasibility category in the adopted Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan, dated May 2022.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
81 Planned Project Without Funding
Street Improvements (continued)
Linear Bikeway Short
-
Term Improvements
Estimated Cost: $11.5M
This project provides for the design and construction of short
-
term linear
bikeway improvements, identified as high priority and with a feasibility category recommended in the adopted Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan, dated May 2022.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Bicycle
Short
-
Term Improvements
Estimated Cost: $1.1M
This project provides for the design and construction of short -
term bicycle
improvements identified as high priority and in the feasibility category, as recommended in the adopted Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan, dated May 2022.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
TraƯic Safety Improvements
Estimated Cost: $7.5M
This project provides for the design and construction of traƯic safety improvements at 25 locations identified in the
adopted Travel Safety Plan
dated December 2023.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2024
Montague Pedestrian Overcrossing at Penitencia
Estimated Cost: $21.5
This project provides for the design and construction of pedestrian overcrossing over
Montagues Expressway adjacent to east of Penitencia
Creek channel.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2016
Main St. Street Light Project
Estimated Cost: $4.8M
This project provides for the design and construction of Midtown decorative streetlights and signal improvements along South Main Street from Carlo Street to Great Mall Parkway.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2016
82 Planned Project Without
Funding
Water Improvements
Asset Renewal and Replacement Program
Estimated Cost: $43.0M
This project provides for the assessment, renewal, improvement, or replacement of the City's aging water infrastructure, as recommended in the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Curtis Well Facility
Estimated Cost: $6.0M
This project provides for the design and construction of the Curtis Well facility, as recommended in the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated
June 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Fire Flow Improvements
Estimated Cost: $3.9M
This project provides for the design and construction of upsizing several water mains, the installation of a backup generator, and the installation of
a PRV to improve the water system for fire flow, as recommended in the adopted Water Master Plan Update, dated June 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Lower Berryessa Creek Water Line
Estimated Cost: $1.1M
This Project
provides for the design and replacement of an existing 14 -
inch diameter water line beneath Lower Berryessa Creek to accommodate future improvements within the existing creek corridor.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2025
Sewer Improvements
Sanitary Sewer CCTV Inspections & Improvements
Estimated Cost: $44.6M
This project provides for Closed
-
Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of
medium
-
to extreme
-
risk 24
-
inch
-
diameter or greater sewer pipelines and
for repair of defects discovered during the
inspection, as recommended
per the adopted Sewer Master Plan, dated August 2022.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Improvements
Estimated Cost: $17.0M
This project provides for the design and construction of sewer pipe segments with significant defects and is considered an extreme risk, with the greatest likelihood of deterioration and the highest consequences of failure, as recommended in the adopted Sewer Master Plan, dated August 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
83 Planned Project Without Funding
Storm Drain Improvements
Channel and Lagoon Dredging
Estimated Cost: $1.5M
This project provides for the removal of debris and deposited soil from City
-
owned channels and lagoons. The City owns the channel
that
parallels I
-
880 from Redwood Avenue to California Circle and lagoons at Hidden Lake, Hall, and California Circle.
Project added to the CIP
on June 2, 2019
Penitencia Pump Station Replacement
Estimated Cost: $10.0M
This project provides for the
design and replacement of the Penitencia
Pump Station at Hall Memorial Park, as recommended in the adopted Master Plan dated October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2012
Jurgens Pump Station Replacement
Estimated Cost: $15.0M
This
project provides for the design and replacement of the Jurgens Pump Station, as recommended in the adopted Master Plan dated October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2017
Storm Drain Pipeline Capacity Improvements
–
High Priority
Estimated Cost: $15.8M
This project provides for the design and construction of storm drain pipelines to increase capacity, as identified as a high priority in the adopted Master Plan, dated October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Storm Drain Pipeline Capacity Improvements
–
Low Priority
Estimated Cost: $12.4M
This project provides for the design and construction of storm drain pipelines to increase capacity and creek maintenance, as identified as a low priority in the adopted Master Plan, dated October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Storm Drain Pipeline Extension Improvements
Estimated Cost: $500k
This project provides for the design and construction of a storm drain pipeline extension as identified in the
adopted Master Plan, dated
October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
Storm Drain Pump Station Improvements
Estimated Cost: $2.6M
This project provides for the design and construction of improvements at the Abbott, Murphy, Oak, and
Spence pump stations, as identified in the
adopted Master Plan dated October 22, 2021.
Project added to the CIP
on July 1, 2023
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Receive a Presentation on the FY 2026–27 Proposed Operating Budget and Provide Direction; and Receive the Annual AB 2561 Report on Vacant Positions and Recruitment and Retention Efforts (Staff Contact: Luz Cofresí-Howe, Finance Director, 408-586-3111; Kelli Parmley, Human Resources Director, 408- 586-3086)
Category: Leadership and Support Services
Meeting Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Recommendation: Receive a presentation on the FY 2026–27 Proposed Operating Budget and provide direction, and receive the report regarding Local Public Employees Vacant Positions, including recruitment and retention efforts and identification of potential hiring process obstacles, to meet AB 2561 Reporting Requirements.
BACKGROUND:
This agenda item presents three related components of the City's FY 2026–27 budget work program for City Council consideration: a structural deficit reduction update including the audit trail requested at the March 3, 2026 Study Session, recommended FY 2026–27 operating budget proposals, and the required AB2561 report on citywide vacant positions and recruitment and retention activities.
On February 18, 2025, staff presented a preliminary five-year General Fund forecast to the City Council identifying a cumulative structural deficit of $28.5 million through Fiscal Year 2029–30. In response, the City adopted a fiscal strategy focused on bringing the General Fund to structural balance – ensuring that recurring costs do not outpace recurring revenues over the forecast period. Over the following 12 months, staff undertook two sets of actions under that strategy: proposed budget actions incorporated into the adopted FY 2025–26 budget (June 3, 2025), and forecast assumption updates presented at the March 3, 2026 Study Session. At that Study Session, Vice Mayor Garry Barbadillo, Esq. requested a detailed, itemized explanation of how each action contributed to the deficit reduction; that audit trail is included in this agenda report and the related presentation.
Also presented at that February 18, 2025 meeting was a comprehensive review of the City's recruitment and hiring activities, which have continued into the current fiscal year. As part of the same fiscal strategy, the City initiated in April 2025 a strategic hiring review process under which each newly vacant position is evaluated by the City Manager’s Office for operational necessity and fiscal impact before recruitment is authorized.
Separately, effective January 1, 2025, Government Code §3502.3 (AB2561) requires public agencies to present the status of vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts at a public hearing before the governing board at least once per fiscal year, prior to adoption of the final budget. The report included in this item addresses both the City's ongoing recruitment activities and satisfies the AB 2561 annual reporting requirement.
Staff is also requesting City Council feedback on recommended FY 2026–27 operating budget proposals, which are described in the Analysis section below.
ANALYSIS:
Structural Deficit Analysis
The City's projected structural deficit at Fiscal Year 2029–30 has been reduced from $28.5 million to $5.4 million – an 81 percent reduction. Looking one year further out to Fiscal Year 2030–31, the deficit has been
reduced from $40.6 million to $11.5 million – a 72 percent reduction. These results were achieved through a combination of recurring expenditure reductions ($2.5 million annually, accumulating to $13.5 million over five years), revenue assumption updates based on actual performance data, and compensation cost realignment to the funds where the work is performed. No service levels were reduced, staffing changes were aligned to areas of reduced demand or negotiated collaboratively with labor partners, and no unplanned reserve draws were required.
City Recruitment, Hiring and Vacancy Report
During the current fiscal year the Human Resource Department has continued its recruitment and hiring activities in partnership with Department staff. The below table provides a summary of the vacancy rate at the end of each quarter of the current fiscal year.
Table 1 - Estimated Vacancy Rate – End of Quarter (data as of March 31, 2026) Quarter FY25-26 FTE Vacancies Vacancy Rate
Q1: Jul - Sept 452 39 8.6%
Q2: Oct - Dec 451 47 10.4%
Q3: Jan - Mar 451 50 11.1%
AB2561 Requirements Regarding Local Public Employees: Vacant Positions Effective January 1, 2025, Government Code §3502.3 (AB2561) addresses the California Legislature's finding that job vacancies in local government are a widespread and significant problem — one that burdens remaining staff with heavier workloads, contributes to burnout, and drives further turnover — and that the public interest is served by ensuring information concerning public agency employment is available to the public. In response, the statute requires public agencies to present the status of vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts at a public hearing before the governing board at least once per fiscal year, prior to adoption of the final budget. If vacancies within a single bargaining unit reach or exceed 20 percent of authorized full-time positions, the agency must — upon request of the recognized employee organization — disclose additional data, including total vacancies, applicant counts, average time-to-hire, and opportunities to improve compensation and working conditions.
Following are the vacancy rates by bargaining unit for the City of Milpitas as March 31, 2026.
Table 2 – Vacancy Rates by Bargaining Unit
Bargaining Unit Budgeted FTE Vacancies
Vacancy Rate by
Bargaining Unit (%)
Vacancies In
Recruitment
IAFF 72 2 2.8% 2
MEA 71 15 21.1% 5
Mid-Con 67 8 11.9% 4
MPOA 116 11 9.5% 11
Pro-Tech 79 7 8.9% 2
Unrepresented 46 7 15.2% 4
Total 451 50 11.1% 28
MEA is currently the only bargaining unit subject to the enhanced disclosure requirements under AB2561.
Human Resources will provide the requisite information upon MEA's request.
FY 2026–27 Operating Budget Proposals
The FY 2026–27 budget proposals carry no net General Fund impact — the 11 proposals presented here total $2,386,076 across all funds, of which $2,254,707 is funded entirely through the Equipment Maintenance Fund, Water and Sewer M&O Funds, and the 2005 CFD, with no draw on the General Fund. The remaining $131,369 in General Fund expenditures is fully offset dollar-for-dollar by corresponding General Fund revenues. The proposal package includes 9 recurring actions and 2 one-time capital outlays.
Table 3. FY 2026–27 Budget Proposals — Summary
# Proposal Department Type General
Fund
Expense
Other
Funds
General
Fund
Revenue
Grand Total
1 After the Bell & Summer
Camp Staffing Support
Recreation &
Community Services
Recurring $56,736 – ($56,736) $0
2 Elimination of Ongoing
Grant Consulting Contract
City Manager Recurring ($42,000) – – ($42,000)
3 Facility Rental Staffing
Support
Recreation &
Community Services
Recurring $18,000 – ($18,000) $0
4 Injury Navigation Services
(Ready Rebound)
Police & Fire Recurring $56,633 – ($56,633) $0
5 Law Clerk Internship
Program
City Attorney Recurring $18,642 – – $18,642
6 Technology Systems
Investment
Information
Technology
Recurring $51,165 – – $51,165
7 Utility Engineering
Add/Delete¹
Public Works Recurring – $38,421 – $38,421
8 Asset Manager
Classification Add/Delete
— Staffing Realignment¹
Public Works Recurring ($83,379) $63,179 – ($20,200)
9 Purchasing Agent
Reclassification¹
Finance Recurring $55,572 – – $55,572
10 Police Vehicle
Replacement
Police – Capital Outlay One-Time – $281,416 – $281,416
11 Public Works Fleet
Replacement
Public Works – Capital
Outlay
One-Time – $2,003,060 – $2,003,060
Grand Total $131,369 $2,254,707 ($131,369) $2,386,076 ¹ FTE realignment — one-for-one position substitution, no net increase in authorized headcount.
Operational and Program Proposals
After the Bell and Summer Camp Staffing Support (Recreation and Community Services — General Fund, Recurring, $0 net). The proposal funds additional part-time staffing to support expanded enrollment in the After the Bell afterschool program and summer camp operations. The incremental General Fund expenditure of $56,736 is fully offset by program revenue, resulting in no net General Fund cost.
Elimination of Ongoing Grant Consulting Contract (City Manager — General Fund, Recurring, ($42,000) savings). The City proposes to discontinue an ongoing grant consulting contract. Elimination produces recurring General Fund savings of $42,000 annually.
Facility Rental Staffing Support (Recreation and Community Services — General Fund, Recurring, $0 net). The proposal funds staffing to support expanded facility rental operations. The $18,000 General Fund expenditure is fully offset by rental revenue, resulting in no net General Fund cost.
Injury Navigation Services — Ready Rebound (Police and Fire — General Fund, Recurring, $0 net). The proposal funds a contracted injury navigation program to support personnel returning from workplace injuries, reducing extended leave durations and associated backfill costs. The $56,633 General Fund expenditure is fully offset by cost recovery, resulting in no net General Fund cost.
Law Clerk Internship Program (City Attorney — General Fund, Recurring, $18,642). The proposal establishes a recurring law clerk internship to expand legal support capacity within the City Attorney's Office.
The $18,642 annual cost has no revenue offset and represents a net new General Fund expenditure, offset elsewhere within the overall proposal package.
Technology Systems (Information Technology — General Fund, Recurring, $51,165). The proposal funds ongoing licensing, maintenance, and support costs for critical technology systems across City operations. The $51,165 General Fund expenditure reflects the annualized cost of sustaining current service levels and is offset elsewhere within the overall proposal package.
Proposed FTE Realignments
The following three proposals realign existing authorized positions. Each is a one-for-one substitution — no net increase in FTE — and together they carry no net General Fund impact.
Utility Engineering Position Reclassification (Public Works — Water and Sewer M&O Funds, Recurring, $38,421). The City proposes to delete an existing Utility Engineering position to add an Assistant Engineer to better align the role with current service demands and enhance technical capacity in field operations. The incremental cost of $38,421 is funded entirely through the Water M&O ($26,895) and Sewer M&O ($11,526) funds. There is no General Fund impact.
Asset Manager — Staffing Realignment (Public Works — Equipment Maintenance and Other Funds, Recurring, ($20,200) net). The City proposes to delete one SCADA Technician position to add an Asset Manager classification and position to strengthen equipment planning, maintenance scheduling, and lifecycle management across City operations. Field crews can only be as effective as the equipment supporting them — sustained investment in asset readiness is what enables personnel to deliver the services residents expect.
This is a one-to-one substitution, and the realignment produces a net reduction of ($20,200) across all funds.
Purchasing Agent Position Reclassification (Finance — General Fund, Recurring, $55,572). The City proposes to reclassify the current Purchasing Agent position to a Purchasing Manager to better reflect the scope of responsibilities, provide senior-level procurement support across all departments, and align the compensation range with the regional market. The existing salary structure sits approximately $50,000 below comparable positions in comparable agencies, which has created a persistent recruitment and retention challenge. The incremental General Fund cost of $55,572 is fully offset within the overall proposal package; there is no net General Fund impact across the package as a whole.
Capital Outlay
Both capital outlay proposals are one-time and funded entirely through the Equipment Maintenance Fund.
There is no General Fund impact from either item.
Police Vehicle Replacement (Police — Equipment Maintenance Fund, One-Time, $281,416). The proposal funds the scheduled replacement of police vehicles consistent with the City's fleet replacement program.
Public Works Fleet Replacement (Public Works — Equipment Maintenance Fund, One-Time, $2,003,060). The proposal funds the replacement of Public Works fleet vehicles and equipment that are considerably past end of life. The Equipment Maintenance Fund is a dedicated internal service fund capitalized through departmental charges specifically to fund these replacements on a planned cycle.
Budget Information Memoranda
The City Manager’s Office has released a number of budget information memoranda to address questions that have been raised during prior City Council discussions on the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget Process and/or to provide additional information to the City Council that is related to the budget process. Copies of these memoranda are provided on the Finance Department’s website here: Budget & Financial Plans | Milpitas, CA
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Approve the budget proposals and direct staff to incorporate them into the FY 2026–27 adopted budget.
Pros: Provides staff with clear direction to incorporate all 11 proposals into the FY 2026–27 adopted budget, allowing adequate lead time to complete the personnel, procurement, and budgetary actions necessary for a July 1, 2026 implementation date.
Cons: None identified. The proposals carry no net General Fund impact and have been developed in the context of the City's structural deficit reduction strategy.
Reason for Not Recommending: This is the staff recommendation.
Alternative 2: Approve some or none of the budget proposals.
Pros: Allows City Council to exercise selective discretion over individual proposals prior to budget adoption.
Cons: The proposals collectively carry no net General Fund impact — rejecting individual proposals without regard to the full package may produce unintended fiscal consequences, as several proposals offset one another. Additionally, deferring the FTE realignments delays addressing active recruitment and retention challenges, and deferring the capital outlay items increases operational and liability risk associated with aging fleet equipment.
Reason for Not Recommending: The proposals have been structured as a balanced package with no net General Fund impact. Staff recommends City Council approve all proposals and direct their inclusion in the FY 2026–27 adopted budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This agenda item has no fiscal impact. Appropriation authority for any City Council-approved FY 2026–27 budget proposals will be established through the formal budget adoption process.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
This item is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15378(b).
ATTACHMENT(S):
N/A
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan (Staff Contact: Jay Lee, Planning Department, 408-586-3077)
Category: Community Development
Meeting Date: 5/5/2026
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to adopt the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (Metro), adopted by the City Council on February 7, 2023, updated the 2008 Transit Area Specific Plan and established the Innovation District as a new employment-focused area intended to support high-intensity office, research and development, and advanced manufacturing uses. The Metro Plan identifies several public improvements within the Innovation District, including two new parks and a multi-use trail along Berryessa Creek, to enhance recreational amenities and connectivity for future workers and residents. While the Metro Plan designates the general location of these open space facilities, further planning and conceptual design work was required to advance their development.
To support this effort, staff submitted an application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grant Program on February 23, 2023, seeking funding to prepare a master plan for parks and trails in the Innovation District. The City Council held a public hearing on March 21, 2023, to express support for the grant application. MTC awarded the City $200,000 in grant funding for the project on June 28, 2023.
Following receipt of the grant, the City’s Purchasing Division issued Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 24-126 on May 8, 2024, for professional services to prepare the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan. The RFP was publicly noticed in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code and distributed through the City’s eProcurement system. Five proposals were received and evaluated by a staff committee based on established criteria. On June 24, 2024, O’Dell Engineering, Inc. was selected as the top-ranked firm. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 9348 on August 13, 2024, formally accepting the MTC grant and authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with O’Dell Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $198,178 for preparation of the master plan.
The Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan is a complementary planning document to the Metro Plan and Play Milpitas Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2021. It identifies future programming for recreation opportunities for workers and visitors within the Innovation District. This document will serve as a starting point for the City to develop the identified park parcels and trail when the land is acquired and funding is available. Alternatively, the City may require private developers to develop the park parcels and trail as part of future private redevelopment of the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
The City’s General Plan 2040 and Parks and Recreation Master Plan set forth specific goals and standards for parkland provision, recreational programming, and facility development. Within adopted Specific Plan areas, such as the Metro Specific Plan, the City is required to achieve and maintain the parks standard and ratios specified in the relevant plan, emphasizing the creation of publicly accessible spaces and facilities. The Master Plan for the Innovation District directly supports these requirements by identifying new park and trail facilities that address both current deficiencies and anticipated needs resulting from increased employment and residential density in the area. Moreover, the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan advances the
City’s commitment to providing a diverse, high-quality public park and trail system that serves the needs of all residents, workers, and visitors.
A key element of the City’s approach is the prioritization of projects that maximize recreation opportunities, capacity, and experiences in new parks developed in Specific Plan areas, with an emphasis on inclusivity and multi-generational use. The Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan incorporates these principles by proposing amenities and design features that accommodate a wide range of users, including active recreation, passive open space, and community gathering areas. This approach is consistent with the City’s policy to leverage partnerships with private developers and other agencies to expand the park system and enhance service levels through joint-use agreements and integrated trail networks.
Development of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan involved a comprehensive, multi-phase planning process designed to ensure that future park and trail facilities are responsive to site conditions, community needs, and best practices in urban open space design. The work completed as part of the master plan included three primary components: site inventory and analysis, public outreach and engagement, and the development of conceptual designs for the proposed parks and trail.
Existing Conditions Analysis
The site inventory and analysis phase entailed a detailed assessment of the physical, environmental, and regulatory characteristics of the parcels identified for park and trail development. This included evaluating existing pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular connectivity, adjacent land uses, utility easements, environmental factors such as wind and sun exposure, and proximity to residential areas. The analysis also considered constraints such as limited site access due to ownership by public agencies and private entities, as well as the presence of Special Flood Hazard Areas requiring compliance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain regulations. In addition, an inventory of nine existing parks in the vicinity was conducted to establish a baseline understanding of available amenities and to inform the programming of new facilities
Public Outreach
Extensive public outreach was conducted to gather input from a broad cross-section of the community and stakeholders. The City hosted two open house community meetings, the first on May 29, 2025, at the Milpitas Community Center, and the second on September 9, 2025, at the Sal Cracolice Community Center. These meetings provided opportunities for participants to learn about the project, review site analysis findings, and provide feedback on desired amenities and design features. Complementing the in-person events, two online surveys were administered, one in spring 2025 and another in fall 2025, advertised through City social media, email lists, and distributed handouts. The surveys solicited preferences on park and trail amenities, programming, and design alternatives, with a total of 91 responses received across both rounds. Community input consistently emphasized the importance of active recreation opportunities, such as playgrounds and sport courts, as well as spaces for community events, natural areas, shaded seating, and accessible walking trails.
Developing the Final Design Concept
Following the initial outreach and needs assessment, the consultant team synthesized community feedback, site analysis results, and relevant policy guidance to develop multiple conceptual design alternatives for each of the two proposed park sites and the Berryessa Creek trail corridor. These alternatives were presented to the public for review and comment during the second round of outreach. Survey participants expressed clear preferences for specific design elements, such as centrally located playgrounds, multi-generational courts, dog parks, and gently curving, shaded trail alignments with ample seating.
Staff also presented the design concepts to the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources (PRCRC) on November 3, 2025 and the City Council on December 16, 2025. The City Council expressed support for the overall vision and approach presented. For the South Park parcel, Councilmembers acknowledged the community’s preference for the overall layout of Option 3, which featured more circular forms and expansive open space. However, they also recognized that survey participants favored the programming elements of Option 2, which included a centrally located playground, small dog park, basketball court, and multi- generational courts. Councilmembers directed staff and the consultant to synthesize these preferences by integrating the open space configuration of Option 3 with the amenity mix and playground placement from Option 2, ensuring that the final concept would maximize both usability and community appeal.
Regarding the North Park parcel, Councilmembers noted that survey respondents preferred Option 3, which offered a diverse mix of recreational opportunities. The Council supported advancing this concept, emphasizing the importance of providing amenities that serve a broad range of users, including families, pet owners, and employees in the Innovation District.
For the Berryessa Creek Trail, Councilmembers highlighted the unanimous community support for a trail alignment with gentle, winding curves, as depicted in Option 1. They also endorsed the inclusion of full shading with trees on both sides of the trail and additional seating areas, consistent with public input. The Council requested that the final trail design prioritize comfort, accessibility, and visual connectivity to adjacent open spaces.
In addition to design preferences, Councilmembers provided direction on several cross-cutting issues:
• They emphasized the need for shaded seating and gathering areas throughout both parks and along the trail, citing community concerns about heat and the desire for comfortable outdoor environments. • Councilmembers encouraged the inclusion of flexible spaces suitable for community events, such as farmers markets and cultural festivals, to support activation and year-round use. • The Council requested that natural areas for relaxation and walking be incorporated, reflecting strong community interest in passive recreation and wellness.
• Councilmembers reiterated the importance of ongoing engagement with property owners and regional agencies, particularly given the City’s current lack of site control over the proposed parcels. • They directed staff to ensure that the final Master Plan clearly documents the rationale for selected design elements and remains adaptable to future technical studies, property negotiations, and evolving community needs
The culmination of this work is a set of preferred conceptual designs for the Innovation District’s parks and trail, which reflect both technical feasibility and the expressed needs and values of Milpitas residents and stakeholders. The master plan documentation includes detailed site analysis maps, summaries of community engagement activities and survey results, and illustrative renderings of the proposed improvements. This comprehensive planning effort provides a robust foundation for subsequent phases of design, environmental review, and implementation.
Final Concept
Table 1: Council Direction and Staff Response Summary
Council Feedback Incorporated? How It Was Addressed
South Park – Layout:
acknowledged community
preference for circular forms and
expansive open space of Option 3
as the preferred overall layout
Yes The preferred South Park concept adopts the circular form from Option 3, including a central open lawn and
circular shade structures, as the organizing
framework for the final design.
South Park – Programming:
Council recognized that survey
participants also favored the
amenity mix of Option 2 (centrally
located playground, small dog
park, basketball court, and multi-
generational courts)
Noted The preferred concept retains Option 3 as the base design, which already incorporates many of the same
key programming elements as Option 2, including a
playground and sport courts, addressing the spirit of
Council's direction. As this is a conceptual plan,
programming details will be further refined during the
design phase once topographic surveys and site
investigations are completed.
North Park: Council supported
advancing Option 3, which offered
a diverse mix of recreational
opportunities for families, pet
owners, and employees
Yes The preferred North Park concept is based on Option 3, which includes a dog park, fitness area, sculpture
walk, and varied passive and active recreation zones
serving a broad range of users.
Berryessa Creek Trail: Council
highlighted unanimous community
support for a trail with gentle,
Yes The preferred trail concept uses the gently curving alignment from Option 1, consistent with both Council
direction and unanimous community survey results.
winding curves (Option 1). They
also endorsed full shading with
trees on both sides of the trail, as
well as additional seating areas.
The preferred trail design incorporates continuous
tree canopy with shade trees on both sides of the trail and integrated seating nodes and seating areas
distributed along the trail.
Global comment: Need for shaded
seating and gathering areas
Yes Both preferred park concepts and the trail design
incorporate shade structures, shade trees, and
seating areas as core design elements, directly
addressing heat comfort concerns raised by the
community and Council.
Global comment: Flexible spaces
suitable for community events,
activation, and year-round use
Yes The preferred South Park concept retains a flexible multi-use loop and open lawn area designed to
accommodate food trucks, farmers markets, and
community events, consistent with this direction.
Global comment: Natural areas for
passive recreation
Yes The preferred concepts include open lawn areas,
walking loops, and natural landscaping elements that
support passive recreation and wellness, consistent
with community survey results and Council direction.
Global comment: Ongoing
engagement
Yes, and
ongoing
The Master Plan acknowledges that the City does not
own the parcels and that implementation depends on
future property acquisition or private development.
Engagement with property owners (including Santa
Clara Valley Water District, Public Storage, and the
industrial building owner) was conducted during the
planning process and is expected to continue.
Global comment: Documentation
of design rationale and
adaptability
Yes The Master Plan is structured as a conceptual, non- binding planning document that documents the
community engagement process, design rationale,
and preferred concepts, while explicitly noting that
future technical studies (including FEMA floodplain
compliance) and property negotiations will inform final design.
The final design for the two parks and trail selected by the majority of community members, PRCRC commissioners, and City Council members was developed with a theme of organic, circular form that define primary spaces. Site furnishings and amenities were designed to embrace this form.
Image 1: South Park Parcel Concept
Image 2: North Park Parcel Concept
Image 3: Trail Concept
For the South Park parcel, the preferred concept features a central open lawn surrounded by a walking loop, a centrally located playground, multi-generational sport courts, shaded seating areas, and flexible event spaces.
The North Park concept includes a diverse mix of amenities such as a dog park, picnic areas, and passive recreation zones, designed to serve both employees and residents. The Berryessa Creek Trail alignment prioritizes comfort, safety, and connectivity, with continuous tree canopy, accessible pathways, and integrated seating. These concepts were developed through iterative community engagement and technical analysis to ensure responsiveness to local needs and long-term adaptability.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative: Do not adopt the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan.
Pros: None
Cons: The City would forfeit the benefit of the $200,000 grant awarded by MTC for the preparation of the Master Plan, resulting in a loss of external funding and significant staff time. The absence of the adopted master plan may reduce the City’s eligibility for future grant funding, as many external funding programs require an adopted plan to demonstrate project readiness and community support. Coordination with private developers, regional agencies, and community stakeholders may be less effective, increasing the risk of inconsistent park and trail development outcomes. Furthermore, if the City were to pursue developing the park parcels and trail through its Capital Improvement Program, the City would have to spend additional monies to prepare a new parks and trail design.
Reason for Not Recommending: This alternative is not recommended because the City’s adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Trails, Pedestrian, and Bikeway Master Plan emphasize the importance of district- level planning to ensure coordinated, equitable, and sustainable development of parks and trails in areas experiencing significant growth. The lack of an adopted master plan for the Innovation District would create uncertainty for future investments, diminish the City’s competitiveness for grant funding and regional partnerships, and result in the inefficient use of previously secured grant funds and staff resources.
PROJECT SCHEDULE/KEY MILESTONES
The following summary outlines key milestones for the major activities of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan. The two parks and trail improvements may be phased as funding becomes available.
• Property Acquisition and Technical Studies: Acquisition of the properties will be the first phase of implementation. Prior to the next phase of design, additional site investigation will be required.
Topographic surveying and boundary surveys will also need to be completed. A full geotechnical site investigation, including borings will be required. Soils testing will also be needed to determine if hazardous toxins are in the soil due to previous land use. • Initiation of Design and Technical Studies: The City will initiate detailed design and engineering for the selected parks and trail concept. This phase will include topographic and boundary surveys, geotechnical investigations, and environmental assessments to address site-specific conditions and regulatory requirements.
• Environmental Review and Permitting: Environmental documentation and permit applications will be prepared in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Coordination with agencies such as the Santa Clara Valley Water District and Pacific Gas & Electric will be required for improvements within utility easements and along Berryessa Creek. • Completion of Construction Documents and Bidding: Final construction documents will be prepared following completion of technical studies and property acquisition. The City will then proceed with procurement and contractor selection in accordance with municipal purchasing requirements. • Phased Construction and Implementation: Construction of park and trail improvements will be implemented in phases as funding becomes available. Initial phases will prioritize areas with secured site control and completed environmental clearance.
The schedule for each milestone is subject to adjustment based on the timing of property acquisition, completion of required studies, and availability of funding for design and construction. Interagency coordination and compliance with permitting requirements may also influence the overall project timeline. If the surrounding area were to redevelop, the City may require the private developer to complete the engineer-level design and construction of the parks and trail.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adoption of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan does not, in itself, authorize any capital construction or property acquisition; however, it establishes the policy and planning framework necessary for future implementation activities that will have fiscal implications for the City. The Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan provides preliminary cost estimates for the conceptual design of two new parks and a multi- use trail within the Innovation District, which are intended to inform future budgeting, grant applications, and capital improvement programming. These estimates are based on current market conditions and recent regional bid data, but actual costs will be subject to escalation, site-specific conditions, and final design development. Furthermore, these preliminary estimates are for the future design and construction of the parks and trails within the Innovation District, should the City elect to proceed with such improvements. If the City chooses to advance development of the proposed parks and trails, funding for design, construction, and related costs may be funded by the Transit Area Development Impact Fee Fund (TADIF).
The estimated order-of-magnitude costs for the preferred conceptual improvements are as follows:
• South Park (2.2 acres): $15,494,000
• North Park (0.87 acres): $6,368,000
• Berryessa Creek Trail (1,896 linear feet): $9,853,000
These figures include allowances for improvements, design, engineering, testing, administration, and inspections, but do not include land acquisition costs, which are subject to market conditions and will be determined through future negotiations. Additional costs may arise from required environmental mitigation, hazardous materials abatement, and compliance with regulatory agency requirements, as identified in preliminary technical studies.
Implementation of the Master Plan’s recommendations, including detailed design, environmental review, property acquisition, permitting, and phased construction, will require identification of new funding sources.
Potential sources may include development impact fees, state and federal grants, special assessments, and partnerships with private developers or other public agencies.
Ongoing operational and maintenance costs for new parks and trails will be determined as part of future project-specific budgeting, once facility designs and programming are finalized. These costs are expected to include landscape and facility maintenance, utilities, staffing, and periodic capital renewal. The City will evaluate the fiscal impact of these ongoing obligations during the design and implementation phases and will bring forward any required appropriations for Council consideration at that time.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
Adoption of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as defined by Section 15378(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it involves the adoption of a plan that will guide future physical changes to the environment, including the potential development of new parks and trail facilities within the Innovation District. However, approval of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan at this stage does not authorize any specific construction activities or property acquisition, nor does it commit the City to a definite course of action regarding individual park or trail projects. The Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan serves as a policy and planning framework to inform future decisions and project-level actions.
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, adoption of the Master Plan is considered a planning study for possible future actions that the City has not yet approved, adopted, or funded. As such, this action is statutorily exempt from CEQA because it involves only feasibility or planning studies and does not have a legally binding effect on any possible future use of the environment. Environmental factors have been duly considered in the preparation of the Master Plan, and any future implementation actions, such as site-specific design, property acquisition, or construction, will be subject to separate, project-level environmental review in accordance with CEQA requirements prior to approval or commencement of those activities pursuant to Cal.
Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15262.
ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Draft Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan (b) Resolution
PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
2026 MASTER PLAN
INNOVATION DISTRICT PARKS
AND TRAIL
Page intentionally left blank.
1 CONTENTSTABLE OF
CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION
03 THE VISION
05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
26 31
35 20
6 3
CHAPTER II - SITE INVENTORY AND
ANALYSIS
07 SITE ANALYSIS
10 FLOODPLAIN & DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
11 LOCAL PARK INVENTORY SUMMARY
16 LAND USE AND ZONING
16 DESIGN CONTINUITY
17 PLANNING DOCUMENTS REVIEW
CHAPTER III - PUBLIC OUTREACH
20 PUBLIC OUTREACH PROCESS
20 PHASE ONE
22 PHASE TWO
24 PARKS, RECREATION, & CULTURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION (PRCRC) WORKSHOP
24 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
CHAPTER IV - PARKS AND TRAIL
CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS
26 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
27 PARK DESIGN NARRATIVE
29 TRAIL DESIGN NARRATIVE
CHAPTER V - IMPLEMENTATION
31 PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION
32 COST ESTIMATE
33 AGENCY PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
APPENDIX
36 APPENDIX A - SURVEY SUMMARY
•SURVEY #1
•SURVEY #2
53 APPENDIX B - OUTREACH MATERIAL
64 APPENDIX C - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
88 APPENDIX D - ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
Page intentionally left blank.
3 CHAPTER I
THE VISION
The City of Milpitas is dedicated to the long-term
planning and development of the city into a vibrant
community supported by well-balanced housing,
retail and employment opportunities. This effort
includes five major development districts intended
to support the city’s urbanization efforts. As one of
the five districts in the Milpitas Metro Specific Plan
(MMSP), the Innovation District is anticipated to be
a thriving employment destination in Silicon Valley,
featuring modern offices, creative flex spaces, and
research and development (R&D) buildings. The
District encompasses land on both sides of Montague
Expressway and S. Milpitas Boulevard, including the
Milpitas Transit Center allowing increased access to
the area.
In support of new R&D residents, the MMSP
designated four parcels as permanent open space.
These parcels are located at the intersection of
Montague Expressway and S. Milpitas Boulevard and
INTRODUCTION
follow Berryessa Creek. Inclusion of these spaces
will be beneficial to workers and visitors as studies
have shown that open space promotes positive
mental health, increases cognitive performance,
overall health and well-being.
The Innovation District Parks and Trail Master Plan is
a complimentary planning document to the MMSP
and Play Milpitas Parks & Recreation Master Plan
Update 2021. It aims to identify future programming
for recreation opportunities for future workers and
visitors of the Innovation District. This document
will serve as a starting point for the City to develop
the identified park parcels and trails when the land
is acquired and funding is available. It is important
to note that any designs and ideas proposed in this
document are preliminary and devised based on
current master planning efforts. Concepts provided
in this document may be altered later during the
Capital Improvement Plan process.
FIG. 1.1 - PROPOSED INNOVATION DISTRICT SOUTH PARK RENDERING
Page intentionally left blank.
5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Developed to support planning improvements
identified in the Innovation District Action Plan
2022, this document outlines priorities and goals
for the future development of approximately eleven
acres for parks and open space to support future
Research & Development Center employees and
visitors. Through research and obtaining community
input, it is apparent that the future design of the
park should prioritize providing a diverse mix of
recreational opportunities specifically with a focus
on spaces for work breaks, informal meetings,
walking paths, shaded areas and more. While
the City does not yet own the parcels, the master
planning process and final master plan document
is a first step of the overall planning process and
opens up opportunities for the city to qualify for
future grants and secure funding to bring the goals
and design in this document to fruition.
SITE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
Efforts in developing the Innovation District Parks
and Trail Master Plan began in 2025 with reviewing
existing planning documents and efforts surrounding
the Innovation District. Relevant documents and
agency design guidelines were reviewed in detail
to understand planning context and restrictions
surrounding the identified park parcel. Existing
parks nearby were inventoried to assess existing
amenities. Due to site access restrictions, a complete
geotechnical report could not be completed at the
time of master plan development and will need
to be performed during the Capital Improvement
Project (CIP) stage.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Input from the public is crucial for creating spaces
that will be actively used. Two phases of outreach
were held to solicit input from community members.
Phase one occurred between May and June 2025
and was intended to inform the community of the
project and gather programming preferences for the
parks and trail. Members of the community had the
opportunity to participate either in person on May
20 at an open house, or through an online survey
that was open between May 3 through June 20.
Through the first phase of outreach, it was clear that
the community’s preference include both active and
restful experiences with an emphasis on safe and
accessible spaces.
With the feedback received from Phase One, three
park and two trail concepts were created. The
concepts were shared with the public in Phase Two
where a meeting was held on September 9, 2025 at
a park near the project site. An online survey was
made available between September 8 to October
13, 2025, asking participants to share their thoughts
and preferences between the different designs.
Concepts were also shared with both of the Parks,
Recreation, and Cultural Resources Commission
(PRCRC) and City Council members.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS
Three (3) different park concepts for the north
and south parcels and two (2) trail concepts were
developed based on community feedback, needs
assessment, and understanding of future land uses
for Innovation District. It is assumed that most
park users will be office workers, commuters and
residents in the adjacent neighborhoods. The park
itself consists of two parcels located on the west
side of the Montague Expressway and S. Milpitas
boulevard intersection. Based on feedback from
the public outreach process and meetings with both
City Council and Parks, Recreation, and Cultural
Resources Commission (PRCRC), the preferred
design is Park Concept Option 3 with organic forms,
a large social gathering space, and diverse recreation
opportunities. Due to the minimal differences
between the trail designs, not one design was
favored. Rather than picking one of the two, future
improvements for the trail should prioritize seating
and shade along the trail.
While the Park Concept Option 3 design appears
to be the preferred design, it is important to note
that changes and modifications to design and
programming may occur later during the Capital
Improvement Plan stage. Available funding for the
project and public sentiment may differ from the
master plan. This master plan effort is intended to
be a guide for city staff for future improvements of
these identified parcels.
6 SITE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
CHAPTER II
This section provides an overview of the site inventory and analysis performed during the early stages of the master planning process. Efforts include reviewing relevant planning documents, codes, drawings, and GIS datasets that are pertinent to the development of this master plan. Coupled with the site inventory of the four parcels and of nearby parks, findings in this section support the public outreach process and inform concept design decisions.
Key focus areas of the review include:
• Background and history of the project
• Design continuity with the broader Metro Area
• Site constraints and opportunities
• Existing programming and amenities are nearby parks • Legal and regulatory compliance
On-site investigation and analysis include an inventory of nearby existing parks and a review of relevant planning documents. A topographic survey was performed and is available for use in identifying existing site conditions during the conceptual design phase.
A preliminary Geotechnical Report (see Appendix C) was completed in February 2026 utilizing historic data and available research. The project was found suitable for the proposed development, however a full design level geotechnical investigation is recommended as part of the design development process, once the City of Milpitas has acquired the properties.
Fig. 2.1 - View to the South of Berryessa Creek South of Montague Expressway
7 SITE ANALYSIS
To determine opportunities and constraints of the
existing sites identified for development of the
Innovation District parks and trail, several existing
conditions were inventoried and assessed. A
preliminary site analysis of the parks and trail parcels has been performed. Included in the assessment
are the following:
• Existing pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular
routes were identified and assessed for
potential connectivity.
• Adjacent land uses were identified.
• An existing PG&E Easement is indicated.
• Environmental influences such as wind
direction, and sun angles were identified.
• Proximity to residential areas is identified.
The site is approximately eleven acres and is located
centrally in the Innovation District. It currently
comprises of a portion of Berryessa Creek, and
existing land owned by three entities: a private
owner, Public Storage, and Santa Clara Valley
Water District. There are several cell towers and
an overhead power easement running through the
properties.
The Innovation District is comprised of multi-family
housing and industrial uses. The Milpitas Bart
station and VTA bus line are nearby. Bicycle routes
and pedestrian sidewalks provide connectivity. A
railroad line bisects the north section of Berryessa
Creek. The streetscape along S. Milpitas Boulevard
appears to be a recent installation with lighting and
street trees enhancing the pedestrian path.
Access to the sites remains limited due to the
land owned by a public agency and two private
operators. There is an existing Class I bike path
along S. Milpitas Boulevard, along with sidewalks
on both sides of Montague Expressway and the S.
Milpitas Boulevard extension. The creek is bisected
by Montague Expressway, which is a busy and multi-
lane arterial street, providing vehicular connection
and access to I-680 on the east. On the north side
of the site, there is an existing, active railroad track over Berryessa Creek.
Fig. 2.2 - SITE ANALYSIS DIAGRAM
8 Fig. 2.3 - View to the East at West of Private
Property on S. Milpitas Boulevard
Fig. 2.6 - View of the North End of Private
Property along S. Milpitas Boulevard, with Creek
Behind
Fig. 2.4 - View of Private Property from S.
Milpitas Boulevard
Fig. 2.5 - North View of Berryessa Creek at
S. Milpitas Boulevard and Garden Street
Intersection
Fig. 2.8 - View of Public Storage Property from
Montague Expressway
Fig. 2.7 - North View of Berryessa Creek at S.
Milpitas Boulevard and Montague Expressway
Intersection
PROJECT SITE PHOTOS - EXISTING CONDITIONS
9 Fig. 2.10 - South View of Berryessa Creek along S.
Milpitas Boulevard
Fig. 2.12 - South View of Maintenance Access
Path along Berryessa Creek North of Montague
Expressway
Fig. 2.9 - View of Berryessa Creek North of
Montague Expressway
Fig. 2.11 - View of Existing Railroad and Crossing
Tracks along S. Milpitas Boulevard
As shown in fig. 2.5, 2.9 and 2.11, the existing
conditions along S. Milpitas Boulevard will not
allow an accessible path of travel along the street
to provide access to the northern trail section. This
condition along with the active railroad line led to
the conclusion that the trail extension to the north
be eliminated from the project.
The creek parcel is managed by Santa Clara Valley
Water District (SCVWD). Currently, the south
portion is fenced and locked, accessible by permit
application to the SCVWD. There is a gravel service
road along a portion of the creek on the east side,
which may be suitable for a pedestrian path. The
creek runs south into the San Jose city limits.
Currently, views around the site remain unobstructed
and open, providing views of the hills on the east
and clear visibility of the trail. A grove of redwood
trees on the south end screens the views in that area
from the adjacent multi-family home development.
Although the creek is fenced, views of the creek are
allowed through a black metal fence.
10 FIG 2.13 - FLOODPLAIN ZONE OF SITE
FLOODPLAIN AND DRAINAGE
CONDITIONS
The project site is partially located within Special
Flood Hazard Areas, with a base flood elevation of
1 to 3 feet (as shown in fig. 2.13). The remainder
of the site falls within Other Flood Areas, which is
interpreted as the 500-year flood zone. The north-
south segment of Berryessa Creek, located south of
Montague Expressway, is equipped with flood walls.
At this time, no storm drainage improvements are
proposed that would affect the project’s design.
11 BOB MCGUIRE PARK
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 3.00 acres
Construction Date: 2015
Park Description:
This park is nestled within a multi-family housing
neighborhood and is well used. The Sal Cracolice
Recreational Facility, situated within the park,
includes meeting rooms and restrooms, and is used
for recreation events. There is an amphitheater area
with a small stage, including seating underneath
a shade shelter. The walking pathways wind
throughout the park areas including a fenced 2-5
area, a 5-12 play area, and an open lawn. Tennis
courts line the south end. The park has a strong
connection to the neighborhood housing.
AUGUSTUS RATHBONE PARK
Type: Urban Park
Size: 0.73 acres
Construction Date: 2017
Park Description:
Located in a quiet, high-density residential area,
Augustus Rathbone Park is a small park providing
recreational open space to the community. The park
is well used and active. Amenities include a walking
path, a covered picnic area, open picnic areas, a
large lawn area suitable for free play, bike racks and
an art sculpture. Accessible seating and play areas
are included.
CREIGHTON PARK
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 5.00 acres
Latest Renovation Date: 2020
Park Description:
This neighborhood park provides many recreation
spaces for activities within the community. There
are several connections to the neighborhood streets
and pedestrian walkways. The park was recently
renovated in 2020. The amenities included are
playgrounds, dog play areas, a restroom building,
fitness stations and a large lawn area. Surrounding
the grand lawn is a looped pathway.
LOCAL PARK INVENTORY SUMMARY
A site inventory has been performed at nine existing nearby parks prior to the development of preliminary parks and trail conceptual designs in the Innovation District. Below are descriptions of the existing conditions at each park. This investigation provides information that are used in assessing the needs for Innovation Parks and Trail, along with other research and reviews of existing planning documents.
Fig. 2.14 - Augustus Rathbone Park Playground
Fig. 2.15 - Bob McGuire Park Tennis Court
Fig. 2.16 - Creighton Park Playground
12 DELANO MANONGS PARK
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 4.00 acres
Construction Date: 2024
Park Description:
This Community Park is located adjacent to Mabel
Mattos Elementary School. The park includes a
community garden area, fitness stations, two dog
play areas, shaded and open picnic areas and an open
field. The park has a large inclusive playground as
well as a smaller playground adjacent to a butterfly
garden. Sport courts and the multi-purpose lawn
area are available to the public when school is not
in session. Other support amenities include storm
water management basins, parking, restrooms and
a maintenance building.
PARC METRO CENTRAL
Type: Urban Park
Size: 0.58 acres
Construction Date: 2003
Park Description:
Park amenities include a large multi-purpose lawn
surrounded by a pathway with bench seating. There
are picnic areas and two playgrounds. The park
does not have accessible furnishings, and several
amenities need repair or replacement. Mature trees
provide shade along the path during the summer
months.
PARC METRO EAST
Type: Urban Park
Size: 2.06 acres
Construction Date: 2003
Park Description:
This small urban park includes amenities to support
passive recreation. There is a small play area, picnic
areas, and a lawn area surrounded by a pathway. A
large shade shelter covers a seating area. The park
has a restroom building and pedestrian lighting. The
concrete pavement and lawn are in fair condition.
Near the entrance, there is a very small play
area. The play equipment and site furnishings are
outdated and showing wear.
Fig. 2.17 - Delano Manongs Park Playground
Fig. 2.18 - Parc Metro Central Lawn
Fig. 2.19 - Parc Metro East Picnic Area
METRO TANGO PARK
Type: Urban Park
Size: 2.55 acres
Construction Date: Estimated completion 2029
Under design development at time of master plan
preparation.
13 PARC METRO WEST
Type: Urban Park
Size: 0.98 acres
Construction Date: 2003
Park Description:
This urban park located near Park Metro Central
has a formal design style and is fence enclosed with
two entry points. Amenities include picnic areas,
playgrounds, game tables and seating along the
perimeter pathway. Arbors and mature trees provide
shade during the summer season. The picnic tables
and lawn areas are in good condition; however, the
playgrounds are in need of renovation.
PINEWOOD PARK
Type: Urban Park
Size: 9.88 acres
Construction Date: 2003
Park Description:
This park is a busy hub with several group picnic
areas, and lighted sport courts. A walking path
surrounds a large multi-use lawn. There are benches
and bike racks, restrooms and parking. Throughout
this large park, there are playgrounds which are
heavily used.
SINNOTT PARK
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 4.67 acres
Construction Date: 1970
Park Description:
Sinnott Park is adjacent to John Sinnott Elementary
School and is connected via a pathway to Browne
Park and Murphy Park to the north, creating a
greenbelt within the larger neighborhood. The park
is currently undergoing renovations that include
improvements to the picnic area, playground,
pathway and restroom building as well as the
installation of fitness stations. The current picnic
area is shaded by trees. Sand volleyball court
is located adjacent to the playground. Walking
pathways surround a large open lawn with mature
trees, and lead to adjacent neighborhoods.
Fig. 2.20 - Parc Metro West Lawn
Fig. 2.21 - Pinewood Park Playground
Fig. 2.22 - Sinnott Park Playground
14 GAP ANALYSIS - 1/2 MILE RADIUS FROM NEARBY PARKS
In the study of existing conditions, a gap analysis (as shown in fig. 2.23) was conducted using Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis methods. This study allowed us to visualize areas that are either adequately served or underserved within a 1/2 mile walk, which is considered a comfortable walking distance for pedestrians. As shown in the image below, most areas around the project site in the Innovation District are within a 1/2 mile walk to parks but receive comparatively lower levels of park access by foot than other neighborhoods.
FIG. 2.23 - NEARBY PARK GAP ANALYSIS MAP
15 FIG. 2.24 - PARK SITES AND FACILITIES MATRIX
PARK SITES AND FACILITIES MATRIX
Through the inventory of existing parks in the area, and assessment of the amenities at each park location, the needs for additional park amenities in this region of the City of Milpitas was determined. The matrix (as shown in fig. 2.24) along with the gap analysis informed the final programming for the Innovation District Parks.
16 FIG. 2.25 - INNOVATION DISTRICT MAP (FROM MILPITAS METRO SPECIFIC PLAN)
LAND USE AND ZONING
The project site consists of four parcels. Berryessa
Creek runs through two linear parcels designated as
Permanent Open Space within the General Plan and
zoned as Park Open Space (POS). The larger parcel
located west of the creek and the smaller triangular
parcel to the east are also zoned as POS. Most
surrounding parcels are zoned as Metro Business
Park Research and Development (BPRD-Metro).
Future development of the adjoining BPRD-Metro
parcels may influence the parks and trail design,
particularly for pedestrian and vehicular circulation
and shading impacts. The BPRD-Metro zone permits
building heights of up to eight stories, Floor Area
Ratios (FAR) between 1.0 and 2.5, zero front setback,
and 10-foot interior and rear setbacks.
The SCVWD guidelines for improvements along
Berryessa Creek require a minimum 25-foot setback
from the top of bank or any adjacent maintenance
road. Additionally, the majority of the site lies within 1% flood zone. The project may be subject to the
municipal floodplain management regulations.
In addition to standard zoning regulations, the
Municipal Code includes special development
standards and allowable uses. Food trucks are
permitted in both the BPRD-Metro and POS zones.
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2097, no minimum
vehicular parking is required, as the site is located
within one-half mile of the Milpitas BART Station.
Notably, a new station substation is proposed within
the western park parcel, near the Milpitas Transit
Center. Additionally, a Pacific Gas and Electric
(PG&E) easement approximately fifty feet in width
traverses the site in a northeast-to-east direction.
DESIGN CONTINUITY
The Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (MMSP) proposes
a pedestrian bridge over Berryessa Creek to provide
a direct connection to the broader Metro Area. The
bridge is aligned with S. Milpitas Boulevard along
an east-west axis. The MMSP also outlines trail
improvements, including permeable, all-weather
surfaces with a minimum width of eight feet (12
feet preferred) to accommodate maintenance
vehicles. Trail improvements must be coordinated
with Santa Clara Valley Water District. Shade trees
are recommended at 30-foot intervals along trails,
and pedestrian-scale safety lighting is required
throughout the area. Wayfinding signage should be
implemented through a coordinated Milpitas Metro
Signage Program. Additionally, the MMSP envisions
a future focal point at Montague Expressway and
S. Milpitas Boulevard, with a visual emphasis from
west to east.
17 PLANNING DOCUMENTS REVIEW
The Westwood team reviewed relevant planning
documents, codes, drawings, and GIS datasets
pertinent to the project scope. The following are key
research documents related directly to the project.
The findings from this review are further assessed
below and will inform concept design decisions. Key
focus areas of the review include:
• The background and history of the project
• Design continuity with the broader
Metro Area
• Site constraints and opportunities
• Legal and regulatory compliance
Milpitas Metro Specific Plan 2023
The Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (MMSP) is a 20-
year horizon planning document for the 510-acre
Metro Plan Area located on the southern portion
of Milpitas. It is an update to the Transit Area
Specific Plan (TASP) that was adopted in 2008 and
emphasizes a vibrant, transit-oriented community
with park spaces, commercial development,
housing, retail, and entertainment. It establishes
land use and open space policies, including a
specific set of improvements and design guidelines,
to ensure the creation of outdoor spaces for place
making and the contribution of high quality of life.
A publicly accessible parks and trail connection is
planned for the Innovation District, including a
pedestrian bridge over Berryessa Creek that will
provide a direct connection to the rest of the Metro
Area. The outreach results for the Milpitas Metro
Area highlighted community needs and preferences
for public spaces including places to gather,
contemplative spaces, and recreational spaces. The
proposed parks and trail improvements will also
provide recreational opportunities for workers, who
are anticipated to be key user groups of the space.
Innovation District Action Plan 2022
The Innovation District Action Plan builds upon the
vision and policies from the MMSP , along with the
City’s General Plan and Economic Development
Strategy. The Action Plan provides the current
characteristics of the Innovation District, existing
land use review of subareas within the Innovation
District, case studies analysis, and fourteen
recommended actions. Each recommended action
is incorporated into one of the following three
categories: incentivizing new development; funding
and investing; and city leadership, outreach, and
partnerships.
Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2021
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update is a
20-year strategic planning document that identifies
strategies to address current recreation needs
and provides a long-term vision for anticipated
recreation demands in the Milpitas community.
The Plan inventoried 36 City parks, including Bob
McGuire Park and Augustus Rathbone Park. Open
space policies from the Milpitas Metro Specific
Plan were developed in conjunction with the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan. The Recreational
Value System is a points-based system that was
established to ensure parks are reaching their
maximum potential in providing recreational
opportunities and amenities. The point-based
system captures categories as diverse recreation
experiences including Active Uses, Contemplative
Uses, Social Uses, Support Facilities, and Required
Amenities.
General Plan 2040
The City of Milpitas General Plan is a comprehensive,
long-term plan that guides the physical development
of the city. Policies related to public spaces and
public art, park and trail system, and recreational
opportunities are developed in the General Plan.
This includes providing recreational opportunities
for all residents and providing places that support
social interaction, connections to nature and
physical fitness to promote community health and
wellness.
Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan
2022
The Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan
establishes a vision and action plan for the City to
create a complete and connected network of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. The Plan reviewed nearly
50 miles of the existing bike network and performed
a needs analysis. There are several existing
bikeways in the Innovation District, including Class
III: Bike Routes along S. Milpitas Boulevard north
of Montague Expressway and a small portion of
Landess Avenue west of Highway 680. A Bicycle
Level of Traffic (LTS) analysis was performed, and
this identified Montague Expressway and Great
Mall Parkway as “High Need, Low Feasibility.”
Improving connections to the Milpitas BART station
and transit and expanding access to trails along S.
Milpitas Boulevard were identified as improvement
opportunities in the Plan.
Enterprise GIS
Relevant GIS data from the City and Santa Clara
County, has been reviewed. Relevant GIS datasets
has been incorporated into developing the site plan
base for conceptual parks and trail plans.
18 Below is a list of pertinent documents and maps
reviewed.
• Assessor Map, County of Santa Clara
• Capital Improvement Program 2025-2029, City
of Milpitas
• Economic Development Strategy and
Implementation Actions, City of Milpitas (May
2020)
• Fiscal Benefits of Employment Lands Study Final
Report Phase I & II: Innovation District Action
Plan, City of Milpitas (June 2022)
• Flood Insurance Rate Maps (Panel 67), Santa
Clara County, California, FEMA (February 2014)
• General Plan and Land Use Map (Milpitas
Hub, City of Milpitas)
• Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan, City of
Milpitas
• Innovation District Action Plan Slide Deck, City
Council Meeting (April 2022)
• Lower Berryessa Creek Flood Protection Project,
Valley Water
• Milpitas Metro Specific Plan, City of Milpitas
(Adopted February 2023)
• Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update, City
of Milpitas (Adopted December 2021)
• Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Chapter,
General Plan 2040, City of Milpitas (Adopted
March 2021)
• Standard Details and Specifications, City of
Milpitas (July 2010)
• Storm Drainage Master Plan, City of Milpitas
(2021)
• Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Master Plan, City of
Milpitas (June 2021)
• Title XI – Zoning, Planning, and Annexation,
Milpitas, California Code of Ordinances (March
2025)
o Section XI-10-9 – Metro Area zones and
Standards
o Section XI-10-39 – POS Park and Public
Open Space District
o Section XI-10-53 – Off-Street Parking
Regulations
o Section XI-15 – Floodplain Management
Regulations
• Zoning Map, City of Milpitas (June 2024)
Potential VTA Transit
Oriented Development
Pedestrian bridge connecting
to Milpitas Transit Center
The focal point of commercial
development at Montague Expressway
and S. Milpitas boulevard
FIG. 2.26 - ILLUSTRATION OF INNOVATION DISTRICT AROUND TRANSIT CENTER
Page intentionally left blank.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
20 CHAPTER III
PUBLIC OUTREACH PROCESS
While the parks and trail for the Innovation District
is predominantly intended for future tenants of the
R&D business park, the master plan process included
a public outreach component as a stepping stone for
the design process. Two phases of outreach were
conducted; the first an informational meeting and
programming study to gauge community needs; and
the second phase where parks and trail concepts
were revealed and community feedback collected.
Community members had the opportunity to
provide input through an online survey at both
phases of outreach. At the conclusion of the two
outreach phases, the overall findings and concepts
were presented before the city’s Parks, Recreation,
and Cultural Commission for feedback prior to
showcasing the different concepts to City Council for
comments. The following section details outreach
efforts and findings of the outreach process.
PHASE ONE
The first phase of community outreach for the
Innovation District Parks and Trail project began
with an open house meeting and a community
survey, aimed at gathering input and ideas from
local residents and workers. A project webpage was
created on the City of Milpitas website. The survey
was made available to complete online for a period
of seven weeks in spring of 2025. This initial survey
was completed by twenty-three participants.
The outreach meeting provided an opportunity
for attendees to learn about the project, explore
displays, and share feedback directly with the design
team. To encourage participation, postcards and
flyers were distributed throughout the community
and shared on social media to promote the event.
Together, these outreach efforts helped identify key
community priorities and preferences for the future
parks and trail development.
Fig. 3.1 - Photo of Outreach Meeting One Fig. 3.2 - Photo of Outreach Meeting One
OUTREACH MEETING ONE
21 CREATIVE STATIONS - PARK PLANNING
Phase One - Meeting Overview
On Thursday, May 29, 2025, the design team,
Westwood, along with City staff hosted an open
house community meeting to gather input
regarding the future Innovation District Parks and
Trail. The meeting was held at a recreation room
at the Milpitas Community Center from 5:30pm to
7:30pm. Fig. 3.3 is a layout map provided to help
attendees navigate the room. Attendees included
four members from the design team, two City staff
members and three members from the public.
Members of the public had the opportunity to learn
more about the project, select preferred park and
trail amenities, design their version of the proposed
parks and enjoy snacks and conversation with City
staff and design team.
Interactive Boards
Meeting attendees were given dot stickers to vote
for different amenities and programs they would
like to see at the park. The top priorities included:
• parking
• restrooms
• lighting
• ample seating
The feedback gathered will play a key role in shaping
the design and programming of the Innovation
District Parks and Trail to better serve the needs and
interests of the Milpitas community.
Creative Stations - Park Planning
Images shown on page 23 depict different design
layouts and program elements prepared by the
attendees participating in the park design activity.
During the meeting, attendees expressed a strong
interest in having more active recreational spaces in
the south park, such as sports courts, playgrounds,
and dog parks. In contrast, due to the smaller size of
the north park, participants preferred more passive
uses, including seating areas and picnic spaces (see
Fig. 3.5 to Fig. 3.10 on page 22).
Fig. 3.3 Outreach Meeting Room Layout Map
Fig. 3.4 - Layout of the Southern Park Fig. 3.5 - Layout of the Southern Park
22 Public Survey/Questionnaire
A community survey was conducted from May 3 to
June 20, 2025 and made available online through a
link shared on the City’s website. Physical handouts
were distributed at the outreach meeting for in-
person participation. Most respondents were adults,
with a few seniors, and all either live or work in
Milpitas. Survey results show that the community is
most interested in active recreational opportunities
for the future park, including playgrounds and
sports courts. Sports courts is the most preferred
feature, with one participant specifically requesting
a basketball court while citing a lack of adequate
courts nearby parks.
In addition to active spaces, respondents expressed
interest in hosting community events like farmers
markets, music festivals, and food events. There
was also strong support for incorporating natural
areas for relaxation and walking, highlighting the
importance of pathways and benches. Participants
also noted the need for shaded seating to provide
relief from the summer heat.
Safety and cleanliness were also key concerns. Many
people emphasized the need for a safe and clean
outdoor space where they can relax in the fresh
air, especially as the area is expected to become a
business district in the future. Participants stressed
the importance of including restrooms, ample trash
bins, and lighting in the park design. While the
community is hopeful that new development will
bring more business and commercial prosperity,
they also expressed concern about preserving the
character of the area and stated that they do not
want more high-rise buildings. Most respondents
also indicated they would either walk or drive to
the park. Therefore, parking will be considered in
the park plan.
For a full summary of the survey questionnaire
results, please see Appendix A.
Phase One Outreach – Findings Summary
In summary, the community envisions a park
that offers both active and restful experiences—a
welcoming space that support recreation,
relaxation, and community events, while remaining
safe, accessible, and compatible with the area’s
future growth.
PHASE TWO
Following the first phase of community outreach,
the design team analyzed community input, future
planning efforts for the Innovation District, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan and developed
three different park concept plans for the north
and south parcels of the park and two trail concept
plans. After several concept review meetings
with City staff, the designs were shared with the
community. The following summarizes outreach
methods and results from the second phase of
community outreach. Following the conclusion of
the second phase, the designs were then presented
to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review.
Public Survey/Questionnaire
A second community survey complementing the
meeting was conducted from September 8 to
October 13, 2025. Access to the survey was made
available both online through a link shared on the
City’s website and as physical handouts distributed
at the outreach meeting for in-person participation.
The survey was broken up into questions that
specifically pertained to each park parcel and the
trail. A total of 68 people completed the survey.
South Park Parcel Questions
Survey participants voted for Option 3 as their
preferred overall south parcel design, favoring the
more circular shapes with larger open space. When
asked about the number and type of amenities in
each design, survey participants preferred Option 2
which included a larger number of game areas and
sport courts. The programming shown in Option 1
which included sport courts, bocce ball, basketball,
playground and walking paths came as a close
second. A separate question for the plaza layout
revealed survey participants prefer the layout for
Option 3 plaza.
North Park Parcel Questions
Similar to the south park, survey participants
preferred Option 3 with its mix of different recreation opportunities over the other two options where
one is programmed mainly for dogs and the other
for passive recreation.
Trail Questions
When it came to the trail designs, participants
unanimously voted to have a trail with gentle
winding curves as shown in Option 1. Folks preferred
the trail to be fully shaded with trees on both sides
of the trail and voted to have more seating.
23 Fig. 3.7 - Photo of Outreach Meeting 2 Boards
Phase Two - Meeting Overview
On Tuesday, September 9, 2025, the design
team, along with City staff hosted an open house
community meeting to share the conceptual
designs for Innovation Parks and Trail. The meeting
was held at a recreation room in the Sal Cracolice
Building from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30p.m. This location
was selected due to its proximity to the project site
and convenience for the community due to it being
in a residential neighborhood with a highly visited
park.
Attendees had the opportunity to view each park
and trail design on display boards and view the
survey results from the previous survey. Like the
first meeting, refreshments were provided. Roughly
twenty members of the community, ranging from
adults to young children attended. Two members
from the design team and two City staff members
were available for questions and to explain the
design concepts and gather feedback.
Interactive Boards
Meeting attendees were encouraged to complete
the survey and also had the opportunity to vote
for their preferred parks and trail design in person.
Each person had three dots to select their preferred
north and south parcel and trail concept. Folks were
allowed to mix and match their votes for the north
and south parcels. By a slight margin the preferred
designs included Option 2-south and north and the
two trails design were equally matched.
Conversation with attendees revealed that
people preferred diversity of programming,
intergenerational play, and shade. Several folks
shared the importance of keeping children safe and
preferring the playground to be set further back
from the street.
Concept 3
Concept 1
Concept 2
Fig. 3.6 - ONLINE SURVEY RESULT
SUMMARY
24 Phase Two - Outreach Summary
While many prefer the overall design aesthetic to Option 3, folks noted that a greater variety of amenities is preferred. For the north park design, survey respondents expressed their preference to include more programming, rather than focus on one type. Participants generally favored more organic walkways and shade for the trails. Nineteen people provided additional feedback to the free answer questions and shared the need for more passive green space that is inclusive as well as the importance of shade. It is important to note that during the next phase of design development, the park and trail designs may be altered due to budget, further site investigation, and any additional future planning efforts.
PARKS, RECREATION, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (PRCRC)
WORKSHOP
Following the close of Phase Two Outreach, the parks and trail concepts were presented to the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Commission (PRCRC) on November 3, 2025. Overall, the PRCRC provided constructive feedback. In general, commission members preferred to see a greater number of diverse amenities that are inclusive in age and abilities. Several members pointed out the need for more diverse sport courts such as handball, tetherball or junior courts. It was agreed that this park location may not be a fitting location for pickleball given the proximity to residential housing, size of the parcel, and projected future users. Many members of the commission also favored having a dedicated dog park in the northern parcel as shown in Option Two and Three, with Option Three being the preferred. In regard to the design aesthetic of the park, commission members preferred the circular shapes and central gathering space it creates in south park Option Three.
FIG. 3.8 - South Park Conceptual Design Option 3 Rendering
25 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
In addition to obtaining feedback from the PRCRC,
City Council had an opportunity to share feedback
and vote for their preferred design. A short project
overview including a summary of work-to-date,
outreach efforts and a presentation of the different
concepts were shared at the December 16, 2025
Council meeting. The presentation slides shared at
the meeting can be found in Appendix ‘B’.
During the meeting, City council members expressed
support for the overall vision and approach of
the master plan. In general, City Council voiced
preference in creating spaces for social activities and larger social gatherings such as farmers markets or
food truck events, and emphasized the importance
of providing amenities that serve a broad range of
users, including families, pet owners, and future
Research & Development Center employees.
While the Council acknowledged the community’s
preference for the overall layout of Option 3 which
featured more circular forms and expansive open
space, the Council noted that survey participants
preferred placement and programming elements
shown in Option 2. For the north park, there was
overall consensus that a dog park would be fitting
for the space given the size and shape of the parcel.
It was noted during the session that the overall focus
of the Innovation parks and trail should be providing
appropriate recreation opportunities for future R&D
FIG. 3.9 - South Park Conceptual Design Option 3 Rendering Playground employees and visitors. Considering future users of
the space, a playground for the park would be a
lower priority item compared to walking pathways,
sport courts, seating for breaks and/or informal
outdoor meeting spaces.
For the trail, members emphasized the importance
of shade for user comfort and preferred the concept
with trees planted on both sides of the trail.
As design development progresses and more site
data becomes available, the final park design may
be adjusted during the design development phase
to reflect the mentioned design preferences. See
Design Development section in Chapter 5 for more
information. Below is a summary of the main points
mentioned from the City Council meeting.
• The need for shaded seating and gathering
areas in the parks and trail to combat urban heat
island effects.
•Incorporate more flexible spaces suitable for
community events for year-round use.
•Spaces should be geared more towards working
employees and provide areas for relaxation,
passive recreation and support wellness.
26 CHAPTER IV
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Taking into consideration the feedback received from the phase one outreach, information gathered from relevant planning documents and site analysis, three conceptual designs for the park and two for the trail were crafted. Each design is intended to provide a distinctly different design aesthetic while providing similar amenities. As the creek bisects the two major park parcels, the concepts identify the parcel located east of Berryessa Creek as north parcel and the one west of the creek as south parcel.
Due to the various existing site conditions, all park designs have the following characteristics in common:
1. There is a Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) easement including two transmission towers with overhead lines running through both park site and crossing the trail. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) standards for tree planting near power lines were researched and incorporated into the design. Planting of the trees for shade is limited by the restrictions for trees to be located near power lines.
2. Landscape areas will be designed with drought tolerant planting, providing color and texture for interest, vegetative buffers from the busy roadways and shade where possible. Much of the park is situated under the PG&E easement created by the transmission towers and overhead lines.
This limited tree height and locations where trees can be planted.
3. Parking and vehicular access to the south parcel is situated along the straight section of S.
Milpitas Boulevard for safety and accessibility reasons. This location also reduces excessive noise for neighboring homes.
4. There is an active railroad line running through the designated trail site, north of Montague Expressway. Considering the setbacks and space available to add a trail, it was determined that extending the trail to this location is not feasible due to safety concerns and the ability to meet accessibility requirements.
5. It is assumed that most park users will be office workers, commuters and residents in the adjacent neighborhoods.
PARKS AND TRAIL CONCEPTUAL
DESIGNS
27 PARK DESIGN NARRATIVE
The final design for the two parks and trail selected by the majority of community members, PRCRC commissioners, and City Council members were developed with a theme of organic, circular form that define primary spaces. Site furnishings and amenities were designed to embrace this form.
South Park
A large entry plaza creates an open space that is suitable for farmers’ market tents, or food trucks providing activities that will draw people into the park. Circular shade structures dot the landscape providing shaded nodes for tables and seating. Seatwalls surround the multi-purpose lawn area that may be used for events or free play. Curvilinear benches provide fun and functional seating at locations that offer views of the creek or active play areas. Amenities include sport courts, playgrounds and game spaces. An abundance of seating areas support workspace, gatherings, and lunch time breaks.
Fig. 4.0 - Circular Shade Element Fig. 4.1 - Curvilinear Bench FIG. 3.9 - South Park Conceptual Design Plan
28 North park
This northern park complements the south park design, incorporating the curved seatwalls along two dog parks. A main walkway pulls pedestrians from the plaza at the Watson Street intersection through to the trailhead. Walkway entries are included at key locations – near the crosswalk at S. Milpitas Boulevard, the bus stop, and the Watson Street intersections.
This park includes a linear fitness area, a sculpture walk, and a passive retreat space located within the landscape. An orchard style grove planting small fruit-like trees along Montague Expressway provides a visual nod to the origins of Santa Clara Valley. These may be lemon trees or flowering pear trees.
A trailhead provides entry into the pedestrian and bike trail, providing amenities such as bike storage, benches, a drinking fountain, and a pet station.
0 10 20 40
SCALE: 1" = 20'
INNOVATION DISTRICT
PARKS AND TRAIL
CONCEPT PLAN OPTION 3 - NORTHERN PARK
Weaved Concrete
Pavement Sculpture Walk
Interchangeable Sculpture
Areas (Colored Concrete)
Curved Bench
Fitness Area
Dog Park Entry
Small Dog Park
With Agility
Equipment
Large Dog Park
With Agility
Equipment
Shade Tree, Typical
Bench Seating
Area
Pedestrian
Walkway (Concrete
Pavement)
Existing PGE
Tower
Berryessa Creek
Future Innovation
District Building
Future Pedestrian PromenadeClass ll Creek TrailExisting Bus Stop Powerline Easement
SCVWD Service
Pathway Maintained
Fig. 4.3 - Proposed Dog Park
Equipment - Double Wall Jump Fig. 4.4 - Proposed Dog Park Equipment - Ramp FIG. 4.2 - North Park Conceptual Design Plan
29 TRAIL DESIGN NARRATIVE
The design for the trail meets the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) guidelines. The trail concept selected through the community outreach process, incorporates gentle curves with seating nodes. Shade trees are located along both sides of the trail, which is centrally located. The end of the trail will have a turnaround at the city boundary. Maintenance access to the creek is provided at a gated access point.
FIG. 4.6 - TRAIL SECTION
FIG. 4.5 - Trail Conceptual Design Plan
Page intentionally left blank.
31 CHAPTER V
IMPLEMENTATION
PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION
The two parks and trail improvements may be phased as funding becomes available.
Acquisition of the properties will be the first phase of implementation. Prior to the next phase of design, additional site investigation will be required. Topographic surveying of the south park parcel has not yet been completed, nor have boundary surveys been done. A full geotechnical site investigation, including borings will be required. In Santa Clara Valley, soils testing is often needed to determine if hazardous toxins are in the soil, due to the previous land use. Additionally, further review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain map and design review with FEMA may be required. With this site specific information, designs will be further developed. One goal is to maximize parking lot capacity and increase circulation options.
In February 2026 an Environmental Review (see Appendix D) was completed by Engeo Incorporated. Through review of historical record sources, it was found that several conditions may be present and require further study.
1. The parcels were developed between 1968 and 1980, a time in which serpentine aggregate base was used in paving processes. This aggregate contains NOA, a hazardous substance. It is recommended that pavement sections are surveyed for potential serpentine presence.
2. During the same period, Montague Expressway was expanded into a major thoroughfare. Additional expansion occurred in 2016 and 2018. Leaded gasoline was commonly used during this time and contributes to aerially deposited lead in some soils. Soils slated for removal should be sampled to determine levels of contamination, if any.
3. Several facilities in the vicinity have been required to incorporate vapor intrusion mitigation systems (VIMS). The proposed restroom building for the park should be reviewed during the planning stage to evaluate the need for VIMS.
4. It is recommended that the existing buildings are surveyed for hazardous materials prior to demolition, to ensure that proper methods of demolition and disposal are incorporated.
32 COST ESTIMATE
Cost estimating was prepared separately for each of the two parks and the trail. The following tables summarize the major categories of site preparation, furnishings, improvements, landscaping and design costs. A range is shown for budgeting purposes. These costs relate directly to basis of design shown in the conceptual plans, considering quantities of area, materials and type of amenities.
Estimates are derived from the most recent market conditions and recent bids within the region. As the project is implemented, budgets must consider escalation, regional market conditions as well as inflation and deflation. These estimates may increase for soil and environment mitigation measures that are currently unknown. Procurement of the land for the two parks is not included and is subject to market conditions.
TABLE OF TRAIL (1,896 FT) COST ESTIMATE
Park Improvements: North Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $4,680,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $936,000
Administration $702,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $6,368,000
Park Improvements: South Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $11,440,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $2,288,000
Administration $1,716,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $15,494,000
Park Improvements: Trail
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $7,280,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $1,456,000
Administration $1,092,000
Inspections $25,000
Estimated Project Total $9,853,000
Park Improvements: North Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $4,680,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $936,000
Administration $702,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $6,368,000
Park Improvements: South Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $11,440,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $2,288,000
Administration $1,716,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $15,494,000
Park Improvements: Trail
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $7,280,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $1,456,000
Administration $1,092,000
Inspections $25,000
Estimated Project Total $9,853,000
TABLE OF NORTH PARK (0.87 ACRES) COST ESTIMATE
Park Improvements: North Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $4,680,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $936,000
Administration $702,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $6,368,000
Park Improvements: South Park
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $11,440,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $2,288,000
Administration $1,716,000
Inspections $50,000
Estimated Project Total $15,494,000
Park Improvements: Trail
Item Estimated Cost Range
Improvements $7,280,000
Design, Engineering, and Testing $1,456,000
Administration $1,092,000
Inspections $25,000
Estimated Project Total $9,853,000
TABLE OF SOUTH PARK (2.2 ACRES) COST ESTIMATE
33 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
With the acquisition of the properties designated
as park parcels, thorough site investigation
will be achievable, including topographic and
boundary surveying. This crucial data will guide the
development of park and trail designs, integrating
community feedback from the Outreach Phase.
Findings from the investigations may alter the layout
and feasibility of certain elements of the master
plan design. Examples include available utility
connections, further development restrictions
due to proximity to creek, or soil contamination
abatement.
Based on outreach efforts, design development
should prioritize incorporating shade throughout
the parks and trail, provide spaces for seating and
social gatherings, and opportunities for respite from
the workplace. Per feedback from City Council,
playgrounds may be incorporated but should not
be the focus, rather multi-generational elements
and a broader range of amenities such as walking
pathways, sport courts, seating for breaks and/or
informal outdoor meeting space would be more
suitable for anticipated users. An emphasis on
views of the natural areas, such as the creek and
tree groves should be incorporated to promote
health and wellness.
The north park should include a diverse mix of
amenities such as a dog park, picnic areas, and
passive recreation zones, designed to serve both
employees and residents. Further community
outreach is anticipated for this park to identify the
dog park amenities and any additional elements to
be included.
AGENCY PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
City requirements will include Planning and Building
Department review and approval for permitting.
Compliance with South Bay Water Recycling (SBWR)
rules and regulations is required and will meet state
ordinances as well. The current SBWR Recycled
Water System Map indicates that recycled water is
available for irrigation of plant material for the two
parks.
During the next phase of design and engineering,
coordination and approval with Santa Clara Valley
Water District (SCVWD) will be required for design
of improvements within the creek banks. For trail
design, the SCVWD Design Guides for Guidelines
and Standards shall be referenced for requirements.
California native plants suitable for riparian
environments must be incorporated for habitat as
well as erosion control. District review and approval
of all plans will be required.
PG&E guidelines for planting trees below high-power
line and within easements has been incorporated in
the design. During the further development of the
park design and engineering, PG&E requirements
must be followed in tree selection and placement
within the park and trail areas.
In addition, environmental clearance may be
required in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This clearance is
typically required before construction commences.
Due to the proximity to the creek, biological,
botanical and hydrological studies may be required.
Transportation and traffic studies will also be
required due to the lack of on-street parking in the
area, however, there is a public parking lot to the
west. The parks and trail are also located within the
1/2 mile radius of several new multi-family homes.
Page intentionally left blank.
35 APPENDIX
36 APPENDIX A
SURVEY #1 - SUMMARY
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47 SURVEY #2 - SUMMARY
48
49
50
51
52
53 APPENDIX B
OUTREACH MATERIAL
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64 APPENDIX C
65 Copyright © 202 6 by ENGEO Incorporated. This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means
whatsoever, nor may it be quoted or excerpted without the express written consent of ENGEO Incorporated.
INNOVATION DISTRICT PARKS AND TRAILS
MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
SUBMITTED TO
Ms. Karen Folsom
Westwood Professional Services
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
PREPARED BY
ENGEO Incorporated
February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
PROJECT NO.
26215.000.001
66 GEOTECHNICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
WATER RESOURCES
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
2350 Mission College Boulevard, Suite 800 Santa Clara, CA 95054 (408) 574-4900 [email protected] www.engeo.com
Project No.
26215.000.001
February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
Ms. Karen Folsom
Westwood Professional Services
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
Subject: Innovation District Parks and Trails Project
Berryessa Creek and South Milpitas Boulevard
Milpitas, California
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Dear Ms. Folsom:
We prepared this preliminary geotechnical report for the proposed Innovation District Parks and Trails project in Milpitas, California, as outlined in our agreement dated February 13, 2026. This report presents the preliminary findings of our assessment of geotechnical and geologic conditions and hazards pertinent to the site, and our preliminary geotechnical conclusions and recommendations for your due diligence and planning of the project.
It is our opinion, from a geotechnical engineering viewpoint, that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations presented in this report are implemented during project design.
We are pleased to have been of service on this project and are prepared to consult further with you and your design team as project design progresses. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact us and we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
ENGEO Incorporated
Jacob Kreider
Lauren Loey, PE Steve Harris, PE, GE
jk/lebl/jtr/sdh/cb
67 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
i of i February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................ ................................ ................................ 1
1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................ ................................ .............................. 2
2.0 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................ 2
2.1 SITE BACKGROUND ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 2
2.1.1 Geology and Seismicity ................................ ................................ ...................... 3
2.1.2 Geology ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 3
2.1.3 Seismicity ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3
2.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS ................................ ................................ ............................... 4
2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................ ................................ ........................ 4
2.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ................................ ................................ .................... 5
3.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 5
3.1 EXISTING FILL ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 5
3.2 EXPANSIVE SOIL ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 5
3.3 SEISMIC HAZARDS ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 5
3.3.1 Ground Rupture ................................ ................................ ................................ . 5
3.3.2 Ground Shaking ................................ ................................ ................................ . 6
3.3.3 Ground Lurching ................................ ................................ ................................ 6
3.3.4 Liquefaction ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 6
3.3.5 Flooding ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 6
3.4 2025 CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS ................................ ................................ 7
4.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................... 8
4.1 PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK ................................ ................................ ....................... 8
4.1.1 General Site Clearing ................................ ................................ ......................... 8
4.1.2 Existing Fill ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 8
4.1.3 Fill Compaction ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 9
4.1.4 Acceptable Fill ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 9
4.1.5 Underground Utilities ................................ ................................ .......................... 9
4.1.6 Drainage ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 9
4.2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS................................ ................................ ......... 10
5.0 DESIGN-LEVEL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT .................................................... 10
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS ....................................... 10
SELECTED REFERENCES
FIGURES
68 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 1 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
As outlined in our agreement dated February 13, 2026 , Westwood Professional Services authorized us to prepare this preliminary geotechnical report for the Innovation District Parks and Trails project in Milpitas, California. The purpose of this preliminary geotechnical exploration report is to provide an assessment of geotechnical conditions and hazards associated with the site and to present preliminary geotechnical recommendations to support the planning of the proposed parks improvement. Our services included the following tasks.
• Reviewing available literature, maps, and historical aerial photographs • Assessment of geological hazards at the site and in the general project area • Preliminary discussion of anticipated subsurface conditions and geotechnical constraints • Preparing preliminary recommendations
• Conceptual measures to mitigate hazards and geotechnical constraints, as appropriate • Preparing a preliminary geotechnical report
For our use, we received the following documents and discussed the project with you.
1. City of Milpitas. Innovation District Parks and Trails, Concept Plan. Received January 9, 2026.
2. City of Milpitas. 2023. Milpitas Metro Specific Plan, Milpitas, California. February 7, 2023.
3. Westwood Professional Services. 2025. City of Milpitas, Topographical Survey and Boundary.
June 27, 2025. Sheets 1 to 6. Project No. 0059323.00.
We prepared this report for the exclusive use of our client and its consultants for preliminary design of this project. If any changes are made in the character, design , or layout of the development, we must be contacted to review the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report to evaluate whether modifications are recommended. This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means whatsoever, n or may it be quoted or excerpted without our express written consent.
1.2 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located in Milpitas, California, south and southeast of the intersection of Montague Expressway and South Milpitas Boulevard as shown in Figures 1 and 2 . The project site consists of three components: Northern Park, Southern Park, and Trail.
The Northern Park is bound ed by Watson Court to the east, existing industrial buildings to the south, Berryessa Creek to the west, and Montague Expressway to the north. The Southern Park is bounded by Berryessa Creek to the east, residential buildings to the south and west, and South Milpitas Boulevard to the north. The Trail is located parallel to Berryessa Creek for approximately 1,900 feet, starting at the intersection of Montague Expressway and South Milpitas Boulevard and continuing south then east.
The parcel information for the site components and current site features are identified in Table 1.2-1.
69 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 1 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
As outlined in our agreement dated February 13, 2026 , Westwood Professional Services authorized us to prepare this preliminary geotechnical report for the Innovation District Parks and Trails project in Milpitas, California. The purpose of this preliminary geotechnical exploration report is to provide an assessment of geotechnical conditions and hazards associated with the site and to present preliminary geotechnical recommendations to support the planning of the proposed parks improvement. Our services included the following tasks.
• Reviewing available literature, maps, and historical aerial photographs • Assessment of geological hazards at the site and in the general project area • Preliminary discussion of anticipated subsurface conditions and geotechnical constraints • Preparing preliminary recommendations
• Conceptual measures to mitigate hazards and geotechnical constraints, as appropriate • Preparing a preliminary geotechnical report
For our use, we received the following documents and discussed the project with you.
1. City of Milpitas. Innovation District Parks and Trails, Concept Plan. Received January 9, 2026.
2. City of Milpitas. 2023. Milpitas Metro Specific Plan, Milpitas, California. February 7, 2023.
3. Westwood Professional Services. 2025. City of Milpitas, Topographical Survey and Boundary.
June 27, 2025. Sheets 1 to 6. Project No. 0059323.00.
We prepared this report for the exclusive use of our client and its consultants for preliminary design of this project. If any changes are made in the character, design , or layout of the development, we must be contacted to review the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report to evaluate whether modifications are recommended. This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means whatsoever, n or may it be quoted or excerpted without our express written consent.
1.2 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located in Milpitas, California, south and southeast of the intersection of Montague Expressway and South Milpitas Boulevard as shown in Figures 1 and 2 . The project site consists of three components: Northern Park, Southern Park, and Trail.
The Northern Park is bound ed by Watson Court to the east, existing industrial buildings to the south, Berryessa Creek to the west, and Montague Expressway to the north. The Southern Park is bounded by Berryessa Creek to the east, residential buildings to the south and west, and South Milpitas Boulevard to the north. The Trail is located parallel to Berryessa Creek for approximately 1,900 feet, starting at the intersection of Montague Expressway and South Milpitas Boulevard and continuing south then east.
The parcel information for the site components and current site features are identified in Table 1.2-1.
Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 2 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
TABLE 1.2-1: Project Site Information
SITE AREA ASSESSOR’S
PARCEL NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT FEATURES
Northern Park APN 092-08-101
(portion of)
1601 Watson Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Self-Storage
facility), Asphalt Parking Lots
Southern Park APN 092-08-105 1550 Gladding Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Materials
distributor and Food Service
facilities), Transmission Power Lines,
Asphalt Parking Lots
Trail APN 092-08-094 Milpitas, CA 95035 Berryessa Creek, Gravel access road
Figure 1 displays the Site Vicinity map and Figure 2 shows the site boundaries.
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on our review of the concept plans prepared by City of Milpitas (n.d.), the proposed improvements for the Innovation District Parks and Trail s project includes the following in each site area.
• The Northern Park will include concrete and granite pathways, concrete trails , fitness area, dog park, and landscaping.
• The Southern Park will include sport and game courts , picnic area, vehicle parking, playground structures, concrete walkways, and landscaping. • The Trail is located parallel to Berryessa Creek and will consist of a Class II creek trail with shoulders, landscaping, and bench seating area along the eastern and northern bank.
2.0 FINDINGS
2.1 SITE BACKGROUND
We reviewed historical aerial photographs and topographic maps from www.historicaerials.com as far back as 1948, and Google Earth imagery as far back as 1999, to understand the site history as it pertains to geologic conditions. The aerial photographs indicate that Berryessa Creek originally trended east to west on the south side of the project area, and by 1956 it was re-routed to run north to south. T he project area was primarily used as farmland up until 1968. In 1963, there were some buildings constructed north of the current Montague Expressway and by 1968 more development was being constructed southwest of the p roject area. By 1980, there was substantial development at the project site, including the construction of the current buildings and parking lots at the Northern Park and Southern Park sites, and around the project area, including industrial buildings and site grading. This stayed relatively consistent until 2002, when residential buildings were constructed southwest of the project area. In 2016, construction of South Milpitas Boulevard and widening of Montague Expressway to the north began and continued un til completion in 2018. The site has remained generally the same since 2018.
70 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 3 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
2.1.1 Geology and Seismicity
2.1.2 Geology
The site is located within the Coast Ranges geomorphic province of California. The Coast Ranges province is typified by a system of northwest -trending, fault-bounded mountain ranges and intervening alluviated valleys. Bedrock in the Coast Ranges consists o f igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks that range in age from Jurassic to Pleistocene. The present geology of the Coast Ranges is the result of deformation and deposition along the tectonic boundary between the North American plate and the Pacific p late. Plate boundary fault movements are largely concentrated along the well -known fault zones, which include the San Andreas, Calaveras, and Hayward faults, as well as other lesser -order faults.
Regional geologic mapping compiled by Wentworth et al. (1999) indicates the Northern and Southern Parks and northern portion of the Trail are primarily covered by Upper Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits (Qpf) and the southern portion of the Trail is primarily younger Holocene alluvial fan deposits (Qhf1) . Historical topographic maps also show levee berm along the channel, which is likely built up from soil taken from Berryessa Creek. See Figure 3 for a regional geology map.
2.1.3 Seismicity
The site is not located within a currently designated Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and no known surface expression of active faults is believed to exist within the site. Fault rupture through the site, therefore, is not likely.
The site is located in a seismically active region that contains numerous faults. Small earthquakes occur every year in the San Francisco Bay Area and larger earthquakes have been recorded and can be expected to occur in the future. Faults have been cataloged and mapped by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in the Quaternary Fa ult and Fold Database of the United States. An active fault is defined by the California Geological Survey as one that experienced surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,700 years) (CGS, 2018). Figure 5 shows the approximate locations of known active faults along with other Quaternary faults based on the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold Database as well as significant historical earthquakes recorded within the San Francisco Bay Area.
To identify nearby faults that are capable of generating strong seismic ground shaking at the site, we utilized the USGS Earthquake Hazard Toolbox and the 2023 National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) to perform a disaggregation of the seismic hazard at the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and at spectral periods up to 5 seconds for a return period of 2,475 years. Based on our experience with work in the project area, we assumed a Site Class D for the disaggregation analysis. We recommend completing future field explorations to obtain shear -wave velocity measurements to verify site class. The resulting faults are listed in Table 2.1.3-1.
71 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 4 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
TABLE 2.1.3-1: Faults Considered Capable of Producing Strong Seismic Ground Shaking at the Site
FAULT NAME
RUPTURE DISTANCE, RRUP MOMENT MAGNITUDE,
MW (km) (mi)
Silver Creek (2) 4.1 2.5 7.27
Hayward (south) (1) 6.5 4.0 7.33
Hayward (south, extension) (8) 7.6 4.7 7.32
Calaveras (center) (9) 9.5 5.9 7.68
Hayward (south) (2) 10.1 6.3 6.67
San Andreas (Peninsula) (2) 25.0 15.5 7.92
*Based on USGS Earthquake Hazard Toolbox: NSHM Conterminous U.S. 2023
These results represent known fault sources contributing at least 1 percent to the seismic hazard at the site considering oscillator periods ranging from the peak ground acceleration ( PGA) to 5 seconds for the given return period. The rupture distances (R RUP) and mean moment magnitudes (MW) listed are based on values assigned by the 2023 NSHM, and the numbers in parentheses after the fault names correspond to fault subsections assigned by the NSHM. The above fault table is not an exhaustive list and other faults in the region may generate sei smic shaking at the project site.
In 2014, the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities estimated that the probability of one or more MW 6.7 or greater earthquake events occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area region within 30 years is considered high, given the known seismic sources in the region.
2.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS
A site topographic plan of the Northern Park and Trail was provided by Westwood Professional Services. Per the plan, the site grades for the Northern Park range from roughly Elevation 69 feet (NAVD88) in the northwest to Elevation 64½ feet in the south. Site grades for the Trail range from roughly Elevation 64 feet in the north to Elevation 72 feet in the east. Based on the to pographic map of Google Earth, the site grades for the Southern Park range from roughly Elevation 58 feet (WGS84) in the west to Elevation 62 feet in the northeast.
Per Google Earth images, the Northern Park is currently occupied by an asphalt parking lot and storage unit facility. The Southern Park is currently occupied by a parking lot and an industrial building, with materials being stored in the parking lot. There is an electrical transmission line support structure in the north ern section of the Southern Park area. The Trail along Berryessa Creek is currently a 20 -foot-wide gravel lane with a concrete ramp in the middle section of the Trail for creek access.
2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
We do not have geotechnical boring data for the project site. Based on our review of subsurface data previously conducted for nearby projects and mapped within the same geologic unit, we anticipate the site will be underlain with stiff to very stiff lean to fat clay within the upper approximately 50 feet with interbed layers of medium dense to dense sand in varying thickness.
Based on the existing site features in the proposed North ern and Southern Park areas, those portions of the project site are likely underlain by fill.
72 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 5 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
Additional explorations should be performed during a design -level geotechnical exploration to determine site-specific subsurface conditions and extent of potential existing fill.
2.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Plate 1.2 of the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Milpitas Quadrangle (CGS, 2001) maps the historical high groundwater depths in the vicinity of the site to be between 5 to 10 feet below ground surface. In high water events, the groundwater will generally match the water level in Berryessa Creek.
Fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation practice, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made.
3.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
From a geotechnical engineering viewpoint, in our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the geotechnical recommendations in this report are properly incorporated into the design plans and specifications. We summarize our conclusions below.
3.1 EXISTING FILL
As described in Section 2.4, previous explorations around the project area encountered existing fill in the upper 5 feet. Non -engineered fill can undergo excessive settlement, especially under new fill or loads. If existing fill is found at the site, we recommend complete removal and recompaction as engineered fill within any improvement or structural areas.
3.2 EXPANSIVE SOIL
Based on previous laboratory data of subsurface soil near the project area, there is potential for expansive lean and fat clay at the proposed improvements. Expansive soil changes in volume with changes in moisture. They can shrink or swell and cause heaving and cracking of slabs-on-grade, pavements, and structures founded on shallow foundations.
3.3 SEISMIC HAZARDS
Potential seismic hazards resulting from a nearby moderate to major earthquake can generally be classified as primary and secondary. The primary effect is ground rupture, also called surface faulting. The common secondary seismic hazards include gr ound shaking and ground lurching.
The following sections present a discussion of these hazards as they apply to the site. Based on topographic and lithologic data, the risk of regional subsidence or uplift, lateral spreading, landslides, tsunamis, flooding or seiches is considered low to negligible at the site.
3.3.1 Ground Rupture
Since there are no known active faults crossing the property and the site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Special Study Zone, it is our opinion that ground rupture is unlikely at the subject property.
73 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 5 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
Additional explorations should be performed during a design -level geotechnical exploration to determine site-specific subsurface conditions and extent of potential existing fill.
2.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Plate 1.2 of the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Milpitas Quadrangle (CGS, 2001) maps the historical high groundwater depths in the vicinity of the site to be between 5 to 10 feet below ground surface. In high water events, the groundwater will generally match the water level in Berryessa Creek.
Fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation practice, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made.
3.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
From a geotechnical engineering viewpoint, in our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the geotechnical recommendations in this report are properly incorporated into the design plans and specifications. We summarize our conclusions below.
3.1 EXISTING FILL
As described in Section 2.4, previous explorations around the project area encountered existing fill in the upper 5 feet. Non -engineered fill can undergo excessive settlement, especially under new fill or loads. If existing fill is found at the site, we recommend complete removal and recompaction as engineered fill within any improvement or structural areas.
3.2 EXPANSIVE SOIL
Based on previous laboratory data of subsurface soil near the project area, there is potential for expansive lean and fat clay at the proposed improvements. Expansive soil changes in volume with changes in moisture. They can shrink or swell and cause heaving and cracking of slabs-on-grade, pavements, and structures founded on shallow foundations.
3.3 SEISMIC HAZARDS
Potential seismic hazards resulting from a nearby moderate to major earthquake can generally be classified as primary and secondary. The primary effect is ground rupture, also called surface faulting. The common secondary seismic hazards include gr ound shaking and ground lurching.
The following sections present a discussion of these hazards as they apply to the site. Based on topographic and lithologic data, the risk of regional subsidence or uplift, lateral spreading, landslides, tsunamis, flooding or seiches is considered low to negligible at the site.
3.3.1 Ground Rupture
Since there are no known active faults crossing the property and the site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Special Study Zone, it is our opinion that ground rupture is unlikely at the subject property.
Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 6 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
3.3.2 Ground Shaking
An earthquake of moderate to high magnitude generated within the San Francisco Bay region could cause considerable ground shaking at the site, similar to that which has occurred in the past. To mitigate the shaking effects, structures should be designed using sound e ngineering judgment and the 20 25 California Building Code (CBC) requirements, as a minimum. Seismic design provisions of current building codes generally prescribe minimum lateral forces, applied statically to the structure, combined with the gr avity forces of dead and live loads. The code-prescribed lateral forces are generally considered to be substantially smaller than the comparable forces that would be associated with a major earthquake. Therefore, structures should be able to: (1) resist minor earthquakes without damage, (2) resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage, but with some non -structural damage, and (3) resist major earthquakes without collapse but with some structural, as well as non-structural damage.
Conformance to the current building code recommendations does not constitute any kind of guarantee that significant structural damage would not occur in the event of a maximum magnitude earthquake; however, it is reasonable to expect that a well -designed a nd well-constructed structure will not collapse or cause loss of life in a major earthquake (SEAOC, 1999).
3.3.3 Ground Lurching
Ground lurching is a result of the rolling motion imparted to the ground surface during energy released by an earthquake. Such rolling motion can cause ground cracks to form in weaker soil.
The potential for the formation of these cracks is considered grea ter at contacts between deep alluvium and bedrock. Such an occurrence is possible at the site as in other locations in the region, but based on the site location, it is our opinion that the offset is expected to be minor.
3.3.4 Liquefaction
Soil liquefaction results from loss of strength during cyclic loading, such as that imposed by earthquakes. The soil considered most susceptible to liquefaction is clean, loose, saturated, uniformly graded, fine-grained sand.
The project area is located within a State of California mapped liquefaction hazard zone (CGS, 2025). See Figure 4 for the Seismic Hazard Zone Map. Based on previous explorations around the project area, there may be interbed layers of medium dense to dense sand below the ground water table. We do recommend field explorations to verify subsurface conditions and potential of liquefaction induced settlement as part of a design level study.
3.3.5 Flooding
We reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Map for the Santa Clara County, California (Map 06085C0067J) dated February 19, 2014 . The site is partially located within a special flood hazard area as well as a 0.2 percent annual chance flood zone. The civil engineer should review pertinent information relating to possible flood levels for the subject site based on final pad elevations and provide appropriate design measures for development of the project, if recommended.
74 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 7 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
3.4 2025 CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
The 2025 California Building Code (CBC) utilizes seismic design criteria established in the ASCE/SEI Standard “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” (ASCE 7 -22). According to ASCE 7 -22, the site soil should be classified based on the time-averaged shear-wave velocity measured from the ground surface to a depth of 100 feet.
As previously discussed, we do not have shear-wave velocity data for this project site; therefore, we considered the Default site class which is the most critical site conditions (or envelope) of Site Classes CD, D and DE in accordance with Sections 20.1 and 20.3 of ASCE 7-22. We recommend collecting shear-wave velocity data during the design -level exploration to further refine the site class and associated seismic design parameters.
We provide the Risk-Target Maximum Considered Earthquake ( MCER) and Design Earthquake (DE) multi-period response spectra based on Section 11.4.5 of ASCE 7-22 and the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS’) Seismic Design Geodatabase in Table 3.4-1. Additionally, we provide the MCER and DE acceleration parameters based on Sections 11.4.3, 11.4.4, and 11.8.3 of ASCE 7-22 in Table 3.4-2.
TABLE 3.4-1: MCE R and DE Multi-Period Response Spectra
PERIOD, T
(seconds)
SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION, Sa (g)
MCER DE
0.00 0.95 0.63
0.01 0.95 0.64
0.02 0.97 0.65
0.03 1.04 0.69
0.05 1.32 0.88
0.075 1.67 1.11
0.10 1.9 1.27
0.15 2.23 1.49
0.20 2.52 1.68
0.25 2.55 1.7
0.30 2.59 1.73
0.40 2.53 1.69
0.50 2.29 1.53
0.75 1.97 1.31
1.0 1.74 1.16
1.5 1.29 0.86
2.0 1.01 0.67
3.0 0.67 0.45
4.0 0.48 0.32
5.0 0.37 0.24
7.5 0.22 0.15
10.0 0.15 0.098
75 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 8 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
TABLE 3.4-2: MCE R and DE Acceleration Parameters for Site Class Default (Latitude: 37.411290, Longitude: -121.886228)
ACCELERATION PARAMETER SYMBOL VALUE (g)
MCER Spectral Response Acceleration at a Period of 0.2 s for Site Class BC SS 2.2 MCER Spectral Response Acceleration at a Period of 1 s for Site Class BC S1 0.88 MCER Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Periods Adjusted for Site Class Effects SMS 2.33 MCER Spectral Response Acceleration at a Period of 1 s Adjusted for Site Class Effects SM1 1.82 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Periods SDS 1.55 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at a Period of 1 s SD1 1.21 MCEG Peak Ground Acceleration Adjusted for Site Class Effects PGAM 0.79
4.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS
The preliminary recommendations included in this report should be utilized for project planning purposes and are intended for the areas of the site that will be developed with structural improvements. These areas include, but are not limited to , structures, sidewalks, and pavement areas. Prior to development, we should be retained to prepare a design-level geotechnical report.
4.1 PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK
As used in this report, relative compaction refers to the in-place dry unit weight of soil expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry unit weight of the same soil, as determined by the ASTM D1557 laboratory compaction test procedure, latest edition. Comp acted soil is not acceptable if it is unstable; it should exhibit only minimal flexing or pumping, as observed by an ENGEO representative. The term “moisture condition” refers to adjusting the moisture content of the soil by either drying if too wet or adding water if too dry. Low expansive fill is defined as having plasticity index of less than 12. We define “structural areas” as any area sensitive to settlement of compacted soil. These areas include, but are not limited to structures, sidewalks, pavement areas, and retaining walls.
4.1.1 General Site Clearing
Areas to be developed should be cleared of surface and subsurface deleterious materials, including existing building foundations, slabs, buried utility and irrigation lines, pavements, debris, fill stockpile, and designated trees, shrubs, and associated roots. Following clearing, the site should be stripped to remove surface organic materials , where present. We recommend to strip organics from the ground surface to a depth of at least 2 to 3 inches below the surface. We recommend removing strippings from the site or, if considered suitable by the landscape architect and owner, to use them in landscape fill. It may be feasible to mow the existing vegetation to as close the ground as feasible and remove the vegetation from the site and then disc the remaining vegetation in place. This should be evaluated by ENGEO just prior to grading.
4.1.2 Existing Fill
If existing fill is encountered after general site demolition, we recommend complete removal of the fill in structural areas to competent native soil, as determined in the field by ENGEO. The existing fill should be subexcavated and reworked as engineered fill provided it meets acceptable fill requirements in Section 4.1.4. We should be retained to observe the subexcavation and test
76 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 9 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
backfilling. Excavations extending below the planned finished site grades should be cleaned and backfilled with suitable material compacted to the recommendations presented in Section 4.1.3.
4.1.3 Fill Compaction
Following site clearing, as described in Section 4.1.1, areas to receive engineered fill should be scarified to a minimum depth of 10 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted. We recommend that engineered fill be placed in loose, relatively level lifts not exceeding 12 inches or the depth of penetration of the compaction equipment used, whichever is less . For land planning and cost estimating purposes, the following compaction recommendations should be used for the placement and compaction of fill.
TABLE 4.1.3-1: Compaction and Moisture Content Requirements
FILL AREA MOISTURE CONTENT
ABOVE OPTIMUM
MINIMUM
RELATIVE COMPACTION*
General Fill At least 3 percentage points 90 percent
Utility Trench Backfill At least 3 percentage points 90 percent
Aggregate base should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557).
Moisture condition aggregate base to or slightly above the optimum moisture content prior to compaction.
4.1.4 Acceptable Fill
In general, we anticipate the on-site soil should be suitable as fill material, provided it is processed to remove concentrations of organic material, debris, and particles greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension.
Imported fill materials should meet the above requirements and have a plasticity index less than the on-site material. We should be allowed to sample and test proposed imported fill materials at least 5 days prior to delivery to the site.
4.1.5 Underground Utilities
Trench backfill should be placed and compacted as recommended in Section 4. 1.3. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide stable, safe trench and construction slope conditions and to follow OSHA safety requirements. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide a trained “competent person” as defined by OSHA to supervise all excavation operations, ensure that all personnel are working in safe conditions, and have thorough knowledge of OSHA excavation safety requirements. Project consultants involved in utility design should specify pipe bedding materials.
4.1.6 Drainage
The project civil engineer is responsible for designing surface drainage improvements. With regard to geotechnical engineering issues, we recommend that finish grades be sloped away from structures and pavements to the maximum extent practical. As a minimum, we recommend that the site does not allow water to pond near foundations, pavements, or exterior flatwork.
77 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 9 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
backfilling. Excavations extending below the planned finished site grades should be cleaned and backfilled with suitable material compacted to the recommendations presented in Section 4.1.3.
4.1.3 Fill Compaction
Following site clearing, as described in Section 4.1.1, areas to receive engineered fill should be scarified to a minimum depth of 10 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted. We recommend that engineered fill be placed in loose, relatively level lifts not exceeding 12 inches or the depth of penetration of the compaction equipment used, whichever is less . For land planning and cost estimating purposes, the following compaction recommendations should be used for the placement and compaction of fill.
TABLE 4.1.3-1: Compaction and Moisture Content Requirements
FILL AREA MOISTURE CONTENT
ABOVE OPTIMUM
MINIMUM
RELATIVE COMPACTION*
General Fill At least 3 percentage points 90 percent
Utility Trench Backfill At least 3 percentage points 90 percent
Aggregate base should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557).
Moisture condition aggregate base to or slightly above the optimum moisture content prior to compaction.
4.1.4 Acceptable Fill
In general, we anticipate the on-site soil should be suitable as fill material, provided it is processed to remove concentrations of organic material, debris, and particles greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension.
Imported fill materials should meet the above requirements and have a plasticity index less than the on-site material. We should be allowed to sample and test proposed imported fill materials at least 5 days prior to delivery to the site.
4.1.5 Underground Utilities
Trench backfill should be placed and compacted as recommended in Section 4. 1.3. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide stable, safe trench and construction slope conditions and to follow OSHA safety requirements. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide a trained “competent person” as defined by OSHA to supervise all excavation operations, ensure that all personnel are working in safe conditions, and have thorough knowledge of OSHA excavation safety requirements. Project consultants involved in utility design should specify pipe bedding materials.
4.1.6 Drainage
The project civil engineer is responsible for designing surface drainage improvements. With regard to geotechnical engineering issues, we recommend that finish grades be sloped away from structures and pavements to the maximum extent practical. As a minimum, we recommend that the site does not allow water to pond near foundations, pavements, or exterior flatwork.
Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 10 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
4.2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Considering the potential subsurface conditions and the nature of the proposed improvements, isolated spread footings and/or drilled piers are suitable to support the proposed playground structures, site lights, and other ancillary structures . The structure foundations should be constructed in prepared native soil or compacted engineered fill.
We recommend that laboratory testing and additional geotechnical analysis be performed during a design -level geotechnical exploration to determine design recommendations regarding structure foundations.
5.0 DESIGN-LEVEL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
As previously discussed, a site-specific, design-level geotechnical report should be prepared as part of the design process once development plans are finalized. The preliminary conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on limited site and laboratory data. The design-level report would include additional subsurface data and laboratory soil testing to provide data for preparation of specific recommendations regarding site grading, foundation design, flexible pavements, and drainage for proposed development. The exploration will also allow for more detailed evaluations of the geotechnical issues discussed in this report and afford the opportunity to provide recommendations regarding techniques and procedures to be implemented during construction to mitigate potential geotechnical/geological hazards.
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS
This report presents geotechnical recommendations for design of the improvements discussed in Section 1.3 for the Innovation District Parks and Trails project. If changes occur in the nature or design of the project, we should be allowed to review this report and provide additional recommendations. It is the responsibility of the owner to transmit the information and recommendations of this report to the appropriate organizations or people involved in design of the project, including but not limited to deve lopers, owners, buyers, architects, engineers, designers, and contractors. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are solely professional opinions and are valid for a period of no more than 2 years from the date of report issuance.
We strive to perform our professional services in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices currently employed in the area; there is no warranty, express or implied. There are risks of earth movement and property damages inherent in building on or with earth materials.
We are unable to eliminate all risks; therefore, we are unable to guarantee or warrant the results of our services.
This report is based upon field and other conditions discovered at the time of report preparation.
We developed this report with limited subsurface data. We assumed that our subsurface exploration data are representative of the actual subsurface conditions across the site.
Considering possible underground variability of soil and groundwater, additional costs may be incurred in completing the project. We recommend that the owner establish a contingency fund to cover such costs. If unexpected conditions are encountered, we must be notified immediately to review these conditions and provide additional and/or modified recommendations, as necessary.
78 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 11 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
Our services did not include excavation sloping or shoring, soil -volume change factors, flood potential, or a geohazard exploration. In addition, our geotechnical exploration did not include work to assess the existence of possible hazardous materials. If any hazardous materials are encountered during construction, the proper regulatory officials must be notified immediately.
This document must not be subject to unauthorized reuse, that is, reusing without our written authorization. Such authorization is essential because it requires us to evaluate the document’s applicability given new circumstances, not the least of which is passage of time.
Actual field or other conditions will necessitate clarifications, adjustments, modifications, or other changes to our recommendations. Therefore, we must be engaged to prepare the necessary clarifications, adjustments, modifications , or other changes before construction activities commence or further activity proceeds. If our scope of services does not include on -site construction observation, or if other persons or entities are retained to provide such services, we cannot be held responsible for any or all claims arising from or resulting from the performance of such services by other persons or entities, and from any or all claims arising from or resulting from clarifications, adjustments, modifications, discrepancies , or other changes necessary to reflect changed field or other conditions.
We assigned the lines designating the interface between layers on the exploration logs using visual observations. The transition between the materials may be abrupt or gradual. The exploration logs contain information concerning samples recovered, indications of the presence of various materials such as clay, sand, silt, rock, existing fill, etc., and observations of groundwater encountered. The logs also contain our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between sample locations. Therefore, the logs contain both factual and interpretative information.
79 Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Page | 11 February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
Our services did not include excavation sloping or shoring, soil -volume change factors, flood potential, or a geohazard exploration. In addition, our geotechnical exploration did not include work to assess the existence of possible hazardous materials. If any hazardous materials are encountered during construction, the proper regulatory officials must be notified immediately.
This document must not be subject to unauthorized reuse, that is, reusing without our written authorization. Such authorization is essential because it requires us to evaluate the document’s applicability given new circumstances, not the least of which is passage of time.
Actual field or other conditions will necessitate clarifications, adjustments, modifications, or other changes to our recommendations. Therefore, we must be engaged to prepare the necessary clarifications, adjustments, modifications , or other changes before construction activities commence or further activity proceeds. If our scope of services does not include on -site construction observation, or if other persons or entities are retained to provide such services, we cannot be held responsible for any or all claims arising from or resulting from the performance of such services by other persons or entities, and from any or all claims arising from or resulting from clarifications, adjustments, modifications, discrepancies , or other changes necessary to reflect changed field or other conditions.
We assigned the lines designating the interface between layers on the exploration logs using visual observations. The transition between the materials may be abrupt or gradual. The exploration logs contain information concerning samples recovered, indications of the presence of various materials such as clay, sand, silt, rock, existing fill, etc., and observations of groundwater encountered. The logs also contain our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between sample locations. Therefore, the logs contain both factual and interpretative information.
Westwood Professional Services Innovation District Parks and Trails 26215.000.001 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
February 13, 2026
Revised February 17, 2026
www.engeo.com
SELECTED REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2022. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE Standard, ASCE/SEI 7-22.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). Annual Book of Standards.
California Building Code.2025.
City of Milpitas. Innovation District Parks and Trails, Concept Plan. Received January 9, 2026.
City of Milpitas. 2023. Milpitas Metro Specific Plan, Milpitas, California. February 7, 2023.
ENGEO. 2025. Geotechnical Report, Milpitas, California. December 19, 2025 . Project No. 13944.000.009.
ENGEO. 2025. Geotechnical Exploration, Milpitas, California. June 3, 2025; Revised December 2, 2025. Project No. 27375.000.001.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2014. Flood Hazard Maps, Map 06085C0067J. Dated February 19, 2014.
Historical Aerials. 2025. www.historicaerials.com; website accessed October 2025.
USGS Earthquake Hazard Toolbox, accessed October 2025.
Wentworth, C.M., et al . 1999. Preliminary geologic map of the San Jose 30 x 60 -minute quadrangle. California.
Westwood Professional Services. 2025. City of Milpitas, Topographical Survey and Boundary.
June 27, 2025. Sheets 1 to 6. Project No. 0059323.00.
80 FIGURES
FIGURE 1: Vicinity Map
FIGURE 2: Site Plan
FIGURE 3: Regional Geologic Map
FIGURE 4: Seismic Hazard Zones Map
FIGURE 5: Regional Fault and Seismicity Map
81 FIGURES
FIGURE 1: Vicinity Map
FIGURE 2: Site Plan
FIGURE 3: Regional Geologic Map
FIGURE 4: Seismic Hazard Zones Map
FIGURE 5: Regional Fault and Seismicity Map
82
83
84
85
86 www.engeo.com
www.engeo.com
Page intentionally left blank.
www.engeo.com
www.engeo.com
88 APPENDIX D
89 Copyright © 2026 by ENGEO Incorporated. This document may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means
whatsoever, nor may it be quoted or excerpted without the express written consent of ENGEO Incorporated.
INNOVATION DISTRICT PARKS AND TRAILS
MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
SUBMITTED TO
Ms. Karen Folsom
Westwood Professional Services
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
PREPARED BY
ENGEO Incorporated
March 23, 2026
PROJECT NO.
26215.000.001
90 GEOTECHNICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
WATER RESOURCES
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 250 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 866-9000 [email protected] www.engeo.com
Project No.
26215.000.001
March 23, 2026
Ms. Karen Folsom
Westwood Professional Services
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
Subject: Innovation District Parks and Trails
Berryessa Creek and S. Milpitas Boulevard
Milpitas, California
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Dear Ms. Folsom:
We are pleased to present our findings on potential sources of soil contamination in the project area and likelihood of encountering asbestos-containing aggregate base beneath paved areas.
This assessment included a review of publicly available local, state, tribal, and federal environmental record sources, standard historical sources, and aerial photographs.
PROJECT SITE AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project site (Site) for the Innovation District Parks and Trails improvements is located adjacent to South Milpitas Boulevard and Montague Expressway and along Berryessa Creek in Milpitas, California. The project site consists of three noncontiguous components:
Northern Park, Southern Park, and Trail.
The parcel information for the site components and current site features in each site area are identified in Table 1 and shown in Exhibit 1 below.
TABLE 1: Project Site Information
SITE AREA
ASSESSOR’S
PARCEL NUMBER
(APN)
ADDRESS CURRENT FEATURES
Northern Park APN 092-08-101
(portion of)
1601 Watson Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Self Storage
Facility), Asphalt Parking Lots
Southern Park APN 092-08-105 1550 Gladding Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Materials
Distributor and Food Service
Facilities), Transmission Power
Lines, Asphalt Parking Lots
Trail APN 092-08-094 Milpitas, CA 95035 Berryessa Creek, Gravel Access Road
91 GEOTECHNICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
WATER RESOURCES
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 250 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 866-9000 [email protected] www.engeo.com
Project No.
26215.000.001
March 23, 2026
Ms. Karen Folsom
Westwood Professional Services
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350
Subject: Innovation District Parks and Trails
Berryessa Creek and S. Milpitas Boulevard
Milpitas, California
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Dear Ms. Folsom:
We are pleased to present our findings on potential sources of soil contamination in the project area and likelihood of encountering asbestos-containing aggregate base beneath paved areas.
This assessment included a review of publicly available local, state, tribal, and federal environmental record sources, standard historical sources, and aerial photographs.
PROJECT SITE AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project site (Site) for the Innovation District Parks and Trails improvements is located adjacent to South Milpitas Boulevard and Montague Expressway and along Berryessa Creek in Milpitas, California. The project site consists of three noncontiguous components:
Northern Park, Southern Park, and Trail.
The parcel information for the site components and current site features in each site area are identified in Table 1 and shown in Exhibit 1 below.
TABLE 1: Project Site Information
SITE AREA
ASSESSOR’S
PARCEL NUMBER
(APN)
ADDRESS CURRENT FEATURES
Northern Park APN 092-08-101
(portion of)
1601 Watson Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Self Storage
Facility), Asphalt Parking Lots
Southern Park APN 092-08-105 1550 Gladding Court,
Milpitas, CA 95035
Commercial Space (Materials
Distributor and Food Service
Facilities), Transmission Power
Lines, Asphalt Parking Lots
Trail APN 092-08-094 Milpitas, CA 95035 Berryessa Creek, Gravel Access Road
Westwood Professional Services 26215.000.001
Innovation District Parks and Trails March 23, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 3
EXHIBIT 1: Site Plan
HISTORICAL RECORD SOURCES
Topographic Maps
Regional geologic mapping compiled by Wentworth et al. (1999) indicates the Northern and Southern Parks and northern portion of the Trail are primarily covered by Upper Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits (Qpf) and the southern portion of the trail is primarily younger Holocene alluvial fan deposits (Qhf1). Ultramafic formations known to contain naturally occurring asbestos were not mapped on the Site.
Aerial Photographs
We reviewed historical aerial photographs for discernible changes to the Site and its vicinity , particularly changes that would indicate potential sources of soil contamination.
The earliest available aerial photograph is from 1948 and depicts the Site as predominantly vacant, with a road in the alignment of present -day Montague Expressway transecting the Site.
Orchards are present on neighboring parcels to the south of the Trail and northeast of the Northern Park from this time to as late as 1968.
From 1968 to 1980, the Northern Park and parts of the Southern Park were paved and developed with commercial structures that remain in place at the time of review. Prior to 1990, serpentinite aggregate base, which contains NOA, was occasionally used in the paving process. Given the age of these paved lots, it is possible that serpentinite-containing aggregate base may be encountered in the demolition process. In the time between 1968 and 1980, Montague
92 Westwood Professional Services 26215.000.001
Innovation District Parks and Trails March 23, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 4
Expressway was also expanded into a major thoroughfare. Leaded gasoline was broadly used during this time, which contributes to the possibility of aerially deposited lead in shallow soil at the Site. In 2016, construction of South Milpitas Boulevard and widening of Montague Expressway to the north of the Northern Park began and continued until completion in 2018. Site conditions have remained generally similar since 2018.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE RECORD SOURCES
We reviewed EnviroStor, a website maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and GeoTracker, a website maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), for cases that may indicate contamination of soil at the Site. The following cases were identified for further discussion.
Jones Chemicals – 985 Montague Expressway
A facility adjacent to the Northern Park is listed as an open GeoTracker cleanup case ( Global ID SL18213593). The facility housed a chemical packaging and distribution facility from the 1960s to the 1990s. Per the GeoTracker summary, imports to the facility included chlorine gas, sulfur dioxide, anhydrous ammonia, various acids and bases, and volatile organic compounds. The cleanup case was opened in the 1980s in response to the explosion of an aboveground storage tank (AST) and subsequent release of betwee n 2,000 and 4,000 gallons of chlorinated solvent onto the ground surface and neighboring Berryessa Creek. Approximately 280 cubic yards of sediment have been excavated from the creek. Groundwater sampling from 2023 indicated residential tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) exceedances both upgradient (east) and downgradient (west) of the Site, suggesting that groundwater underneath the Site likely exceeds residential screening levels for PCE and TCE. Residential soil vapor exceedances for PCE and TCE were also noted in the 2023 sampling results. This case is hydraulically upgradient of the Site and not anticipated to pose a risk to the Site.
North American Transformer – 1200 Piper Drive
Three open GeoTracker cases, Global IDs T10000006809, SL18208588, and T10000011367, relate to the former North American Transformer facility approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Site. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) , polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , PCE, TCE, chromium, and hydrocarbons have been identified as constituents of concern at the facility.
Remediation has included in situ treatment and excavation of approximately 5,063 tons of soil. In 2005, a covenant and environmental restriction was recorded for the site. This document noted that soil had been remediated to residential cleanup goals, but groundwater contamination, noted as originating from Jones Chemicals, still posed a concern. As such, vapor barriers are required under new structures at the Site, and permission must be acquired from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) prior to excavation beyond 12 feet below the ground surface. This case is hydraulically upgradient and unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site.
Herzstein – 1535 Gladding Court
A facility approximately 200 feet north of the Site is a closed GeoTracker leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case (Global ID T0608500118). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) were detected at 810 parts per million (ppm) below a 550-gallon underground storage tank (UST) at the site. The tank was removed in 1985, with no overexcavation performed. Three monitoring wells were installed at the site to monitor groundwater. The closure document,
93 Westwood Professional Services 26215.000.001
Innovation District Parks and Trails March 23, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 4
Expressway was also expanded into a major thoroughfare. Leaded gasoline was broadly used during this time, which contributes to the possibility of aerially deposited lead in shallow soil at the Site. In 2016, construction of South Milpitas Boulevard and widening of Montague Expressway to the north of the Northern Park began and continued until completion in 2018. Site conditions have remained generally similar since 2018.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE RECORD SOURCES
We reviewed EnviroStor, a website maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and GeoTracker, a website maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), for cases that may indicate contamination of soil at the Site. The following cases were identified for further discussion.
Jones Chemicals – 985 Montague Expressway
A facility adjacent to the Northern Park is listed as an open GeoTracker cleanup case ( Global ID SL18213593). The facility housed a chemical packaging and distribution facility from the 1960s to the 1990s. Per the GeoTracker summary, imports to the facility included chlorine gas, sulfur dioxide, anhydrous ammonia, various acids and bases, and volatile organic compounds. The cleanup case was opened in the 1980s in response to the explosion of an aboveground storage tank (AST) and subsequent release of betwee n 2,000 and 4,000 gallons of chlorinated solvent onto the ground surface and neighboring Berryessa Creek. Approximately 280 cubic yards of sediment have been excavated from the creek. Groundwater sampling from 2023 indicated residential tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) exceedances both upgradient (east) and downgradient (west) of the Site, suggesting that groundwater underneath the Site likely exceeds residential screening levels for PCE and TCE. Residential soil vapor exceedances for PCE and TCE were also noted in the 2023 sampling results. This case is hydraulically upgradient of the Site and not anticipated to pose a risk to the Site.
North American Transformer – 1200 Piper Drive
Three open GeoTracker cases, Global IDs T10000006809, SL18208588, and T10000011367, relate to the former North American Transformer facility approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Site. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) , polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , PCE, TCE, chromium, and hydrocarbons have been identified as constituents of concern at the facility.
Remediation has included in situ treatment and excavation of approximately 5,063 tons of soil. In 2005, a covenant and environmental restriction was recorded for the site. This document noted that soil had been remediated to residential cleanup goals, but groundwater contamination, noted as originating from Jones Chemicals, still posed a concern. As such, vapor barriers are required under new structures at the Site, and permission must be acquired from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) prior to excavation beyond 12 feet below the ground surface. This case is hydraulically upgradient and unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site.
Herzstein – 1535 Gladding Court
A facility approximately 200 feet north of the Site is a closed GeoTracker leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case (Global ID T0608500118). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) were detected at 810 parts per million (ppm) below a 550-gallon underground storage tank (UST) at the site. The tank was removed in 1985, with no overexcavation performed. Three monitoring wells were installed at the site to monitor groundwater. The closure document,
Westwood Professional Services 26215.000.001
Innovation District Parks and Trails March 23, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 5
published in 1995, indicated that the soil contamination is “limited in extent to the west and southwest of the former tank area, and likely to be limited to the east and northeast as well.” TPH-g and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) were not detected in the two downgradient monitoring wells for four consecutive quarters prior to closure. This case is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site.
Custom Drywall, Inc. – 1570 Gladding Court
A facility approximately 150 feet north of the Site is the subject of a closed LUST GeoTracker case (Global ID T0608500481). This case relates to a release from a 2,000 -gallon UST, which was subsequently removed in 1986. A small amount of soil and groundwater were removed from the tank pit, and the SFRWQCB deemed further remediation unnecessary based on the small concentrations of TPH -g detected. This case was closed in 1996 and is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site.
PUBLIC RECORDS SOURCES
Historical building permit re cords for the Site were requested from the City of Milpitas on January 28, 2026. The City of Milpitas sent permit records for 1601 Watson Court (Northern Park) and 1670 South Milpitas Boulevard (Southern Park). The City of Milpitas’s online permit database was also searched for records that would specify the dates of construction of the buildings at the Site or whether grading had occurred since serpentinite baserock was banned in 1990. A grading permit was approved for 1601 Wat son Court in 2016, though historical aerials do not indicate significant changes to the Site around that time.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the age of the developments at the Site, it is possible that hazardous building materials exist in structures, and that serpentinite-containing aggregate base may be present beneath paved portions of the Site. Prior to redevelopment, a hazardous building materials survey should be conducted on existing structures , and pavement sections should be observed for serpentinite-containing aggregate base.
Potential source s of soil contamination include aerially deposited lead from historical use of Montague Expressway, and upgradient industrial uses which may have impacted soil regionally and along Berryessa Creek (i.e., the solvent release from Jones Chemical). Soil slated for removal should be sampled at a minimum for metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds.
Contaminated soil and/or aggregate may be profiled, excavated, and disposed from the site as Class II or potentially Class I depending on analytical results. Alternativ es to disposal such as a clean cap may be appropriate depending on quantity of impacted soil , if any. Such a cap would require regulatory engagement, land use covenant (LUC) or equivalent, regular assessments of its effectiveness, as well as regular maintenance.
Regarding vapor intrusion, the Site is situated in an area with known groundwater contamination including PCE and TCE. Several residential facilities in the vicinity are under LUCs requiring vapor intrusion mitigation systems (VIMS) in response to releases of chlorinated solvents in the area. If structures are planned for this redevelopment, location and proposed construction of the structures should be reviewed to evaluate the need for VIMS.
94 Westwood Professional Services 26215.000.001
Innovation District Parks and Trails March 23, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 6
If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please call and we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
ENGEO Incorporated
Kendyl Bree Nadine Periat, PG
kb/np/ca
Page intentionally left blank.
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS ADOPTING
THE INNOVATION DISTRICT PARKS AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Milpitas, California (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the designated recipient for state and federal funding assigned to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency / Metropolitan Planning Organization of the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area region for the programming of projects; and
WHEREAS, MTC offers funding and technical assistance to local jurisdictions through its Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grant Program to meet the Bay Area's long-range goals of reduced greenhouse gas emissions and more affordable housing for all; and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the City Council adopted the Milpitas Metro Specific Plan (Metro Plan) as an update to the Transit Area Specific Plan (TASP), establishing an employment-focused Innovation District to support high-intensity office, research and development, and advanced manufacturing uses; and
WHEREAS, the Metro Plan identifies several public improvements within the Innovation District, including two new parks and a multi-use trail along Berryessa Creek, to enhance recreational amenities and connectivity for future workers and residents; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2023, the City submitted an application to MTC through the PDA Planning Grant Program to request funding for the preparation of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing on the City's PDA Planning Grant application and expressed its support for the City's application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to prepare a conceptual parks and trails plan for the Innovation District; and
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2023, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission authorized the funding of the project in the amount of $200,000 at its Commission Meeting; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9348, formally accepting the MTC grant award of $200,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with O'Dell Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $198,178 for the preparation of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan involved a comprehensive, multi-phase planning process, including a detailed site inventory and analysis, extensive public outreach and engagement, and the development of conceptual designs for the proposed parks and trail; and
WHEREAS, the City hosted two open house community meetings, the first on May 29, 2025, at the Milpitas Community Center, and the second on September 9, 2025, at the Sal Cracolice Community Center, and administered two online surveys, receiving a total of 91 responses, to gather community input on desired amenities, programming, and design features; and
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2025, staff presented the design concepts to the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Commission (PRCRC), which reviewed and provided input on the proposed park and trail concepts; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, the City Council reviewed the proposed conceptual designs and provided direction to staff and the consultant to synthesize community preferences, including integrating the open
space configuration of Option 3 with the amenity mix and playground placement from Option 2 for the South Park parcel, advancing Option 3 for the North Park parcel, and prioritizing a gently curving, shaded trail alignment with ample seating for the Berryessa Creek Trail; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2026, staff presented the final draft Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan to the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Commission, and the Commission recommended approval of the Master Plan to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan is a complementary planning document to the Metro Plan and the Play Milpitas Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2021, and identifies future programming for recreation opportunities for workers and visitors in the Innovation District; and
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan 2040 and Parks and Recreation Master Plan set forth specific goals and standards for parkland provision, recreational programming, and facility development, and the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan directly supports these requirements by identifying new park and trail facilities that address both current deficiencies and anticipated needs resulting from increased employment and residential density in the area; and
WHEREAS, adoption of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as defined by Section 15378(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; however, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, adoption of the Master Plan is considered a planning study for possible future actions that the City has not yet approved, adopted, or funded, and is therefore statutorily exempt from CEQA, as it involves only feasibility or planning studies and does not have a legally binding effect on any possible future use of the environment; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council adopt the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan as the policy and planning framework to guide future park and trail development within the Innovation District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
The City Council has considered the full record before it, which includes, but is not limited to, such things as all published staff reports, oral and written testimony by staff, the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Commission, City Council and the public, and all other relevant materials and evidence submitted or provided to it.
Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The City Council hereby finds that adoption of the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, as the Master Plan constitutes a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not yet been approved, adopted, or funded, and does not commit the City to any definite course of action regarding individual park or trail projects. Any future implementation actions, including site-specific design, property acquisition, or construction, will be subject to separate, project-level environmental review in accordance with CEQA requirements prior to approval or commencement of those activities.
SECTION 3. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
The City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby adopts the Innovation District Parks and Trails Master Plan as the policy and planning framework to guide the future development of two new parks and a multi-use trail within
the Innovation District, consistent with the goals and policies of the Milpitas Metro Specific Plan, the City's General Plan 2040, and the Play Milpitas Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2021.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___________ day of _____________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
___________________________
Suzanne Guzzetta, City Clerk
APPROVED:
Carmen Montano, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christian Curtis, City Attorney
CITY OF MILPITAS
AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Approve Changes to the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook to Incorporate Changes to Local Ordinance and State Statute, Including the Adoption of a Meeting Technology Disruption Policy as Required by SB 707 (Staff Contact: Suzanne Guzzetta, City Clerk, 408-586-3001; and Christian Curtis, City Attorney, 408-586-3041)
Category: Leadership and Support Services
Meeting Date: 5/5/2026
Recommendation: Approve changes to the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook to incorporate changes to Local Ordinance and State Statute, including the adoption of a Meeting Technology Disruption Policy as required by SB 707 (Durazo).
BACKGROUND:
On January 11, 2022, the City Council approved the City of Milpitas City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook 2021 (the “Handbook”). This version represented a comprehensive update to the prior 2004 Handbook, which had last been amended in 2007. The update process spanned several years (2018–2022) and included the work of an Ad Hoc Council Handbook Subcommittee. The Handbook is intended to be updated periodically to reflect changes in law and Council procedures.
Since its adoption, the City Council has approved updates to the Handbook on February 7, February 21, and June 20, 2023; January 23, 2024; and September 2, 2025.
On April 26, 2026, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 194.2, which amended the vacancy process in section 2.00 of the Milpitas Municipal Code. The new process in Ordinance No. 194.2 differs from the old process currently reflected in the Handbook.
Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), signed into law on October 3, 2025, requires local agencies to adopt policies addressing meeting technology disruptions. The legislation establishes new standards for the conduct of public meetings, including requirements for transparency and procedures to address technological failures that may affect public access or participation.
ANALYSIS:
The proposed update to the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook is necessary to ensure compliance with SB 707, which requires all local agencies to adopt a formal policy addressing meeting technology disruptions by July 1, 2026. The law applies to in-person, virtual, and hybrid meetings and requires agencies to establish clear procedures to address interruptions to audio, video, or teleconferencing systems that could impact public access or participation.
While the Handbook provides comprehensive guidance on meeting procedures, including agendas, minutes, Council actions, and public participation; it does not currently include a dedicated policy addressing technology disruptions. The absence of such a policy presents a compliance gap under SB 707, which now requires agencies to specify how meetings will be managed if disruptions occur.
The recommended update will be added to Handbook Chapter IV “Meetings,” outlining procedures to be followed if a meeting technology disruption occurs. This includes, but is not limited to:
• Immediate notification to meeting participants and the public regarding the nature and expected duration of the disruption.
• Suspension of meeting proceedings until public access is restored, as required by law. • Documentation of the disruption and the steps taken to resolve it in the official meeting record. • Procedures for resuming, continuing, or adjourning the meeting if the disruption cannot be resolved in a timely manner.
• Compliance with all applicable provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §54950 et seq.), which requires that all deliberations and actions of the City Council be conducted openly and with full public access.
The proposed policy is designed to align with the priorities of procedural rules established for the City Council, which require adherence to federal and state law, local ordinances, and Council-adopted rules, in that order of precedence. The addition of a meeting technology disruption policy will ensure that the Handbook remains the authoritative source for Council procedures, except where superseded by higher legal authority.
In developing the policy, staff reviewed best practices from peer agencies and guidance from the California Municipal Clerks Association. The resulting language reflects common elements such as clear communication protocols, defined staff roles, and documentation requirements. Because this update is mandated by state law and administrative in nature, no formal public outreach was conducted; however, the City Clerk’s Office remains available to respond to questions regarding implementation.
This recommended update also includes modifications to Chapter IV that reflect changes from SB 707 regarding remote participation in meetings. It further includes a change to Chapter II regarding vacancies, reflecting the City Council’s adoption of Ordinance No. 194.2.
POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):
Alternative 1: Defer Adoption of a Meeting Technology Disruption Policy Pending Further State Guidance
Pros: Allows the City to consider additional implementation guidance or model policies that may be issued by the State of California or relevant professional associations.
Provides time to observe how other municipalities interpret and operationalize SB 707, potentially informing a more tailored local policy.
Cons: The City would remain out of compliance with SB 707 until a policy is adopted, which could expose the City to legal or procedural risks.
Reason for Not Recommending: This alternative is not recommended because SB 707 establishes a clear statutory requirement for local agencies to adopt a meeting technology disruption policy. Deferring action would leave the City without a compliant policy in place, increasing the risk of noncompliance and undermining public confidence in the City’s commitment to open and accessible government.
PROJECT SCHEDULE/KEY MILESTONES
If the City Council approves this update to the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook, the version online will be replaced with a version incorporating the red-lined changes in the attached handbook in the week following the City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of the meeting technology disruption policy as required by SB 707 will be implemented using existing City staff resources and does not require additional funding beyond the current fiscal year’s approved operating budget. No new technology purchases, software licenses, or external consulting services are necessary for the incorporation of the policy into the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):
This item involves approval of changes to the City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook to incorporate a meeting technology disruption policy as required by SB 707. The proposed action is administrative in nature
and does not involve any physical development, construction, or activities that could result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment. Therefore, this item is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15378(b).
ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Draft City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook – Redlined (b) Senate Bill 707 (SB 707) – Chaptered Bill Text
City of Milpitas
City Council Procedures and Protocols
Handbook
20265
Revised September 2, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i-
Chapter I. Purpose and Overview ........................................................................................ 1 Chapter II. Duties of the City Council .................................................................................... 2 Chapter III. Mayor and Councilmember Conduct.................................................................... 7 Chapter IV. Meetings .............................................................................................................. 9 Chapter V. Meeting Agendas and Minutes ...................................................................... 1921 Chapter VI. City Council Actions ......................................................................................... 253 Chapter VII. Communication ............................................................................................... 257 Chapter VIII. Council Liaison Roles .................................................................................... 3129