Agenda packet — Modesto City Council, April 7, 2026 (part 2 of 9)

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs for the Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger Legal Services Agreement will be paid from the General Liability Insurance Fund and cost for the Meyers Nave Legal Services Agreement will be paid from the General Fund. Costs will be absorbed within the current operating year budget, not to exceed each of their Council approved amounts.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

Due to the urgent nature this item was not presented to a Council Committee.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

This item does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 and requires no environmental review.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution approving a Fifth Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger increasing the agreement amount by $250,000, for a total Agreement amount not to exceed $1,450,000 for continued representation in tort cases, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee, to execute the Amendment.

Resolution approving a Third Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Meyers Nave amending the scope of work to include litigation and trial counsel support and increasing the agreement amount by $250,000, for a total Agreement amount not to exceed $349,500, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment.

Approved by:

Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
Christina Alger, Director of Human Resources
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution – Fifth Amendment to Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger LSA

2. Resolution – Third Amendment to Meyers Nave LSA

3. Fifth Amendment to Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger LSA

4. Third Amendment to Meyers Nave LSA
#12..
- 202 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Amendments to Legal Services Agreements for Continued Representation

Page 4 of 4 ends

5. Fourth Amendment to LSA- SVH

6. Third Amendment to LSA-SVH

7. Second Amendment to LSA- SVH

8. First Amendment to LSA -SVH

9. Original LSA -SVH

10.Second Amendment to LSA- Meyers Nave

11.First Amendment to LSA- Meyers Nave

12.Original LSA- Meyers Nave

13.Levine Act Disclosures (2)
#12..
- 203 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE LEGAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER INCREASING THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT BY $250,000, FOR A TOTAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,450,000 FOR CONTINUED

REPRESENTATION IN TORT CASES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-231, Council approved a Legal Services Agreement with Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to continue representing the City in tort cases; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-008, Council approved a First Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Swingle increasing the agreement amount by $300,000 from $250,000 for a revised total amount not to exceed $550,000 to continued representation in tort cases; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-382, Council approved a Second Amendment to the agreement increasing the amount by $300,000 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-259, Council approved a Third Amendment to the agreement increasing the amount by $100,000 for a total not to exceed $950,000; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-411, Council approved a Fourth Amendment to the agreement increasing hourly rates and increasing the amount by $250,000 for a total not to exceed $1,200,000; and #12..
- 204 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX
WHEREAS, Swingle continues to prepare multiple cases for trial simultaneously, as well as handling a number of additional smaller cases; and WHEREAS, this amendment will provide a budget for continued representation for those cases and future assigned cases; and WHEREAS, Modesto Municipal Code Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid. However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC 8-3.204(f) “Where the Purchasing Manager, in her discretion, determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under the existing agreement to include additional similar goods or services, of limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruptions to City projects or services”; and WHEREAS, this amendment conforms to MMC 8-3.204 as we are amending the agreement for continued representation in the same or similar matters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves a Fifth Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Swingle, Van Egmond & Heitlinger increasing the agreement amount by $250,000 for a total agreement amount not to exceed $1,450,000 for continued representation in tort cases, as provided in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, and further authorizes the City Attorney to execute such agreement in a form substantially similar to Exhibit A. #12..
- 205 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee, are hereby authorized to execute the Amendment, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

The foregoing resolution was introduced in a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember ________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ______, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC City
Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#12..
- 206 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE LEGAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MEYERS NAVE AMENDING THE SCOPE OF

WORK TO INCLUDE LITIGATION AND TRIAL COUNSEL SUPPORT AND INCREASING THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT BY $250,000, FOR A TOTAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $349,500, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT WHEREAS, on July 28, 2025, the City entered into a Legal Services Agreement with Meyers Nave for legal advice and assistance in relation to the City’s ordinance related to public assembly, in an amount not to exceed $35,000; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2025, the City entered into a First Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement, increasing the not to exceed amount to $95,000 to support continued services; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, the City entered into a Second Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement, increasing the not to exceed amount to $99,500 to pay final invoices on the assigned matter; and WHEREAS, given the recent challenge of the ordinance, a Third Amendment to the agreement is necessary to amend the scope of services to include litigation defense and trial counsel and provide additional funds in the amount of $250,000 to support continued services; and
WHEREAS, Modesto Municipal Code Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid. However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC 8-3.204(f) “Where the Purchasing Manager, in her #12..
- 207 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX
discretion, determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under the existing agreement to include additional similar goods or services, of limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruptions to City projects or services”; and WHEREAS, this amendment conforms to MMC 8-3.204 as we are amending the agreement for continued representation in the same or similar matters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves a Third Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Meyers Nave amending the scope of work to include litigation and trial counsel support and increasing the agreement amount by $250,000 for a total agreement amount not to exceed $349,500, as provided in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, and further authorizes the City Attorney to execute such agreement in a form substantially similar to Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his designee, are hereby authorized to execute the Amendment, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
#12..
- 208 -
04/07/2026/CAO/JSanchez/Item X [Type here] 2025-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced in a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember ________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ______, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC City
Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#12..
- 209 -

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This FIFTH AMENDMENT to the Legal Services (this "FIFTH AMENDMENT") is made and entered into on the ____________ day of ___________ ___________ ("EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and between the CITY of MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation ("CITY") , and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER a Professional Corporation ("ATTORNEY"), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, CA 95354. CITY and ATTORNEY are herinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES", and singularly as "PARTY".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("AGREEMENT") to provide legal advice, representation and assistance to City in defense of tort claims as assigned; and
WHEREAS, ATTORNEY is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by the AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY desire to amend the AGREEMENT for further service by increasing the previously approved amount of fees by Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), for a new not to exceed amount of One Million Four Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,450,000).

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the CITY OF MODESTO and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER dated May 23, 2023 and amended by Resolution Nos. 2024-008, 2024-382, 2025-259 and 2025-411 is amended as follows:

1. Section 2(a) of Paragraph 2, “Fees and Costs,” is amended to increase fees by Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), to read as follows:
“The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (thereafter the “Service”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed a total sum of ONE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,450,000).”

2. Entire Agreement. The PARTIES to this FIFTH AMENDMENT understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, as amended, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this FIFTH AMENDMENT. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the AGREEMENT between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this FIFTH AMENDMENT. No alteration to the terms of this FIFTH AMENDMENT shall be valid unless approved in writing by ATTORNEY and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code. #12..
- 210 -

3. Authority. The person signing this FIFTH AMENDMENT for ATTORNEY hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this FIFTH AMENDMENT on behalf of ATTORNEY and to bind ATTORNEY to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this FIFTH AMENDMENT as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_____________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
#12..
- 211 -
ATTORNEY:
_____________________________________
a Professional Corporation
_____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
_____________________________________
State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This THIRD AMENDMENT to the Legal Services (this "THIRD AMENDMENT") is made and entered into on the ____________ day of ___________ ___________ ("EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and between the CITY of MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation ("CITY") , and MEYERS NAVE a Professional Corporation ("ATTORNEY"), located at 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017. CITY and ATTORNEY are herinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES", and singularly as "PARTY".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("AGREEMENT") to provide legal advice and assistance in relation to the City's “Restrictions on Use of Specified Items During Public Assembly” ordinance; and WHEREAS, ATTORNEY is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY desire to amend the AGREEMENT to add services to the scope of work and increase the budget from $99,500 to $349,500.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the CITY OF MODESTO and MEYERS NAVE dated July 28, 2025, as amended on October 29, 2025 and February 25, 2026, is amended as follows:

1. Section 1(a) of paragraph 1, "Services," is amended to read as follows:
"Scope of Work: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Attorney shall provide to City the following services (“Services”):

Provide legal advice and assistance in relation to First Amendment matters, City regulations related to public assembly, including possible amendments and litigation defense and trial counsel assistance against possible challenges.”

2. Section 2(a) of Paragraph 2, “Fees and Costs,” is amended to state as follows:
“The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (thereafter the “Service”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed a total sum of THREE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS DOLLARS ($349,500).”

3. Entire Agreement. The PARTIES to this THIRD AMENDMENT understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated July 28, 2025, as amended, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this THIRD AMENDMENT. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the AGREEMENT between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this THIRD AMENDMENT. No alteration to the terms of #12..
- 213 -
this THIRD AMENDMENT shall be valid unless approved in writing by ATTORNEY and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

4. Authority. The person signing this THIRD AMENDMENT for ATTORNEY hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this THIRD AMENDMENT on behalf of ATTORNEY and to bind ATTORNEY to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this THIRD AMENDMENT as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_____________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
#12..
- 214 -
ATTORNEY:
_____________________________________
a Professional Corporation
_____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
_____________________________________
State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This FOURTH AMENDMENT to the Legal Services (this "FOURTH AMENDMENT") is made and entered into on the 2
nd day of December 2025 ("EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and between the CITY of MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation ("CITY"), and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER a Professional Corporation ("ATTORNEY"), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, California 95354. CITY and ATTORNEY are herinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES", and singularly as "PARTY".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("AGREEMENT") to provide legal advice, representation and assistance to City in defense of tort claims as assigned; and
WHEREAS, ATTORNEY entered is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by the AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY desire to amend the AGREEMENT for further service by increasing the previously approved amount of fees from $950,000 to $1,200,000 and updating Hourly Rates.

1. Section 2(a) “Fees and Costs,” is amended to state as follows:
a. Hourly Rates:

Partner/Of Counsel: $235.00/hour
Associates: $210.00/hour
“The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (thereafter the “Service”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed a total sum of ONE MILLION, TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,200,000).”

2. Entire Agreement. The PARTIES to this FOURTH AMENDMENT understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this FOURTH Docusign Envelope ID: 648FB422-33D3-4893-BE02-2E50DB1A0A73 #12..
- 216 -
AMENDMENT. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the AGREEMENT between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this FOURTH AMENDMENT. No alteration to the terms of this FOURTH AMENDMENT shall be valid unless approved in writing by ATTORNEY and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

3. Authority. The person signing this FOURTH AMENDMENT for ATTORNEY hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this FOURTH AMENDMENT on behalf of ATTORNEY and to bind ATTORNEY to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this FOURTH AMENDMENT as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_____________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 648FB422-33D3-4893-BE02-2E50DB1A0A73 12/10/2025
#12..
- 217 -
ATTORNEY:
_____________________________________
a Professional Corporation
_____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
_____________________________________
State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Third Amendment to the Legal Services (this “Third Amendment”), is made and entered into on 22
nd day of July 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”), and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER, a Professional Corporation (“Attorney”), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, California 95354. City and Attorney are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and singularly as “Party”.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City and Attorney entered into a Legal Services Agreement (“Agreement”) to provide legal advice, representation and assistance to City in defense of tort claims as assigned; and
WHEREAS, Attorney is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City and Attorney desire to amend the Agreement for further service by increasing the previously approved amount of fees from $850,000 to $950,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the City of Modesto and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER dated May 23, 2023 and amended by Resolution No. 2024-008 and 2024-382 is amended as follows:

1. Section 2(a) of Paragraph 2, “Fees and Costs,” is amended to state as follows:
“The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (thereafter the “Service”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed a total sum of nine hundred fifty thousand dollars ($950,000).”

2. Entire Agreement. The parties to this Third Amendment understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Third Amendment. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the Agreement between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Third Amendment. No alteration to the terms of this Third Amendment shall be valid unless approved in writing by Attorney and by City, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

Docusign Envelope ID: 2D958399-E41D-43D2-8036-0ECEFF509E7A #12..
- 219 -

3. Authority. The person signing this Third Amendment for Attorney hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this Third Amendment on behalf of Attorney and to bind Attorney to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By:

Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2D958399-E41D-43D2-8036-0ECEFF509E7A 7/30/2025
#12..
- 220 -
ATTORNEY:

SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER
a Professional Corporation
____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.

State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to the Legal Services (this “Second Amendment”), is made and entered into on 22
nd day of October 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”), and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER, a Professional Corporation (“Attorney”), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, California 95354. City and Attorney are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and singularly as “Party”.

2. Entire Agreement. The parties to this Second Amendment understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Second Amendment. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the Agreement between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Second Amendment. No alteration to the terms of this Second Amendment shall be valid unless approved in writing by Attorney and by City, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

Docusign Envelope ID: 78BFBBDD-39EE-4380-9173-3629F910C2A4 #12..
- 222 -

3. Authority. The person signing this Second Amendment for Attorney hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this Second Amendment on behalf of Attorney and to bind Attorney to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By:

Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 78BFBBDD-39EE-4380-9173-3629F910C2A4 10/24/2024
#12..
- 223 -
ATTORNEY:

SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER
a Professional Corporation
____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.

State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to the Legal Services (this “First Amendment”), is made and entered into on 23rd day of January 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”), and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER, a Professional Corporation (“Attorney”), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, California 95354. City and Attorney are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and singularly as “Party”.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the City of Modesto and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER dated May 23, 2023, is amended as follows:

2. Entire Agreement. The parties to this First Amendment understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated May 23, 2023, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this First Amendment. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the Agreement between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this First Amendment. No alteration to the terms of this First Amendment shall be valid unless approved in writing by Attorney and by City, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 138F2FE0-399E-4871-98C0-2105ACB15267 #12..
- 225 -

3. Authority. The person signing this First Amendment for Attorney hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this First Amendment on behalf of Attorney and to bind Attorney to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By:

Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
________________________________
Christina Alger, Director of Human Resources
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 138F2FE0-399E-4871-98C0-2105ACB15267 1/31/2024
#12..
- 226 -
ATTORNEY:

SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER
a Professional Corporation
____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.

State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

TYPE OF BUSINESS ENTITY (check one):
_____ Individual/Sole Proprietor
_____ Partnership
_____ Corporation
_____ Limited Liability Company
_____ Other (please specify: ______________)
______________________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
_________________________________
Title
______________________________________
Additional Signature (if required)
______________________________________
Title
DocuSign Envelope ID: 138F2FE0-399E-4871-98C0-2105ACB15267 Attorney
#12..
- 227 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
1 LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Legal Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into on the 23 rd
day of May, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”), located at 1010 Tenth Street, Sixth Floor, Modesto, California 95353 and SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER, a Professional Corporation (“Attorney”), located at 1207 I Street, Modesto, California 95354. City and Attorney are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and singularly as a “Party.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires to continue Attorney’s services with respect to providing legal advice, representation and assistance to City in defense of tort claims as assigned; and WHEREAS, Attorney is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby agreed as follows:

1. Services.
a. Scope of Work: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Attorney shall provide to City the following services (“Services”):

Claims including litigation as assigned. Cases will include tort, trip and fall, sidewalk, road and other similar cases.

Attorney shall not be compensated for services outside the scope of work identified under this Section unless prior to the commencement of such services:
(i) Attorney notifies City and City agrees that such services are outside the scope of work under this Section; (ii) Attorney estimates the additional compensation required for these additional services; and (iii) City, after notice, approves in writing a Supplemental Agreement specifying the additional services and amount of compensation therefor.

Specific tasks including specific claims under the scope of work of this Agreement performed by Attorney will be assigned by City with written notice to Attorney. Within ten (10) days of receiving notice by City of a new task, Attorney shall provide City a budget for the requested task. Attorney must receive written approval by City of the proposed budget prior to commencement DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 228 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
2 of task. Total compensation for all tasks under this Agreement shall not exceed the total compensation under Section 2 of this Agreement. b. Term: This Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date and shall continue in effect until both Parties have fully performed their respective obligations under this Agreement unless sooner terminated as provided in Section

7. c. Partner in Charge: The partner in charge of the defense of City in assigned tort claims will be Bradley Swingle. Attorney will utilize experienced associate attorneys and paralegals under supervision of the partner in charge. The partner in charge will be the contact person for City and will make himself/herself reasonable available to respond to questions from the City Attorney or City staff.

2. Fees and Costs.
a. Hourly Rates:

Bradley J. Swingle $175.00/hour
Colleen F. Van Egmond $175.00/hour
Amanda Heitlinger $175.00/hour
The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (hereafter the “Services”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed the total sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).
b. Reimbursable Expenses. City shall reimburse Attorney for the actual, reasonable and necessary expense of travel out of the Modesto metropolitan area, approved in advance, at $0.65.5 per mile. Attorney will not charge City for the cost of telephone calls or photocopying. Litigation costs and expenses for statutory fees, witness fees, reporters’ per diem and stenographic transcriptions, jury fees, and the expenses of serving process shall be advanced by Attorney and reimbursed by City. Expert consultants and witnesses may be retained by Attorney on terms acceptable to City, approved in advance by email or letter by the City Representative (as defined hereafter), in which case City shall reimburse Attorney or pay such consultants or experts directly.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 229 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
3 c. Billing:
i. Legal billings shall be submitted to City every thirty (30) days unless otherwise advised.
ii. Each task shall be distinctly and completely identified. In litigation matters, City will not pay invoices that contain block billing. Each billing entry must contain the initials of the individual performing the task, the nature of the task, the date it was performed, and the length of time it took.
iii. Costs under $1,000.00 shall be paid by Attorney and submitted with their normal billing.
iv. City reserves the right to audit all invoices.
v. Payments to Attorney shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of Attorney’s invoice, generally within sixty (60) days of receipt. Attorney shall be responsible for supplying all documentation necessary to verify the monthly billings to the satisfaction of City.
vi. In addition to the provisions stated elsewhere in this Agreement regarding the payment of fees, billing and budgeting, the following guidelines for billing apply:
(1) City expects each individual working on the matter for which Attorney is retained to have the necessary experience to perform the services required to protect or pursue City’s interests in the matter in a cost effective manner, consistent with high professional and ethical standards.
(2) City expects Attorney to select the individual most suitable for the task required and the specific needs of the matter, and to use the maximum efficiencies available. Billings for services performed by the inappropriate level of personnel will be reduced by City based on rate adjustments for the appropriate level of personnel. (3) City will not pay for unnecessary review of texts, codes, rules of court, or other fundamental references. City will pay the hourly rate for specific legal research which is unique to the matter, assuming that Attorney has used maximum efficiencies and that Attorney has not already recently performed research in the same or very similar areas of law.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 230 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
4 (4) City acknowledges the benefit of communications between attorneys in the firm. City does, however, expect that intra-office conferences will only be held as needed, and will be kept to a minimum. Intra-office conferences shall be for the purpose of discussing strategy and legal issues which directly further the matter. City will not pay for conferences which are supervisorial, instructional or administrative. Any invoice which lists an intraoffice conference that does not meet these guidelines must contain a full explanation and is subject to reduction by City. City will not pay for “team meetings” and City will scrutinize all intra-office conferences for “value added” to the matter by the conference, for the number of individuals attending the conference, the length of the conference, the subjects discussed at the conference and who participated in it, and will, in City’s sole discretion, determine if such value has been added.
(5) City will not pay for local telephone calls, incoming facsimiles, postage, time spent on filing, calendaring, indexing pleadings, photocopying, conferences with Clerks of court or court reporters, secretarial proofreading, re-drafting due to substandard work, or opening, organizing or closing files. City will not pay for time billed by summer interns, time for more than one individual to attend a trial, hearing, court appearance, arbitration, mediation, deposition, third party meeting, conference call or similar event, unless otherwise approved by City in advance.
(6) Vague billing which does not contain sufficient information to allow City’s reviewer of the invoice to determine the nature of the task, the reason for the task, and the individual performing the task is subject to reduction by City.
(7) City will not reimburse for overtime, word processing, supplies, anything identified on an invoice as “miscellaneous,” or any other unidentified charges.
d. Budget:
i. Within ten (10) days of the Effective Date, Attorney shall provide City with a proposed budget for the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement. If Services involve tasks that have not yet been assigned by City, Attorney shall provide City with a proposed budget for all assigned new tasks with ten (10) days of receiving written notice from the City assigning Attorney the new task. Total compensation for all tasks under this Agreement shall not exceed the total compensation under Section 2 of DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 231 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
5 this Agreement. The budget shall include all projected fees and costs to be incurred by Attorney and necessary for completion of the Services necessary to conclude the representation. The budget shall be a good faith estimate and shall be as complete and detailed as reasonably possible, including such items as discovery and motions for trial, preparation of documents for transactional services, and anticipated research and investigations. The proposed budget shall identify the projected total hours that will be billed to each task, and the individual that are anticipated to be performing the task. Any deviation from the budget in excess of fifteen percent (15%), must be approved in advance by the City Attorney or designee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should it become reasonably apparent to Attorney that the actual billings will exceed Attorney’s initial estimate of anticipated legal costs and fees, Attorney shall immediately notify City thereof in advance and shall submit a revised written estimate for City’s approval.

3. Reporting.
a. Attorney shall provide City with a preliminary status report and evaluation within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date and the assignment of such task which report shall include an evaluation of the total exposure to the City, the liability risk, estimated cost to litigate or settle, and the particular attorneys who will be assigned. In this preliminary report, Attorney shall also make recommendations for discovery and any needed investigation, if any, and provide an estimate of total anticipated legal costs and fees for the handling of this matter. Thereafter, Attorney shall provide a status update to the City Representative, as defined in Section 4, every sixty (60) days on any matter under this Agreement. b. Attorney shall provide to City representative an electronic version of all agreements, pleadings, motions, and discovery documents filed or propounded by Attorney in a Microsoft Word format compatible with that used by the City Attorney’s office.
c. In the event that Attorney’s handling of the above-designated matter exceeds a period of twenty-four (24) months, Attorney shall, in addition to providing regular status reports to City, also report directly to the City representative on an annual basis and no later than March 30th of each year, setting forth in detail the status of the matter, and Attorney’s plan for further handling of the matter, and the estimated length of time to conclude the matter.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 232 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
6 4. City Representative. The City Attorney, or the City Attorney’s designee, shall be the “City Representative” under this Agreement and shall administer this Agreement for City, including any payments hereunder. All Attorney questions pertaining to this Agreement shall be referred to the City Representative or the Representative’s designee.

5. Insurance Requirements. During the entire term of this Agreement, Attorney shall maintain the following insurance:
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance: Coverage should be at least as broad as:
i. Insurance Services Office Form No. CG 0001 (Commercial General Liability);
ii. Insurance Services Office Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) (Automobile Liability, Code “any auto”);
iii. Workers’ Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California, and Employers’ Liability Insurance:
iv. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance against loss due to error, omission or malpractice.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance: Attorney shall maintain limits no less than:
i. Commercial General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence, including endorsements for contractual liabilities, broad form property damage and personal injury.
ii. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for personal injury and property damage arising from owned, hired and nonowned vehicles. iii. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability: Workers’ compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers’ Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. iv. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. d. Other Insurance Provisions: The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 233 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
7 i. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages:
(1) The General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be written on an occurrence form and shall name City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insureds.

Such policy(ies) of insurance shall be endorsed so that Attorney’s insurance shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of Attorney’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (2) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its officials, employees or volunteers.
(3) Coverage shall state that Attorney’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. ii. All Coverages:
(1) Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that coverages shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Attorney agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City and City approves the reduction in coverage or limits. Attorney further agrees that it shall not increase any deductibles or self-insured retentions on any such policy except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City and City approves such increase.
(2) In the event claims made forms are used for any Professional Liability coverage, either (i) the policy(ies) shall be endorsed to provide not less than a five (5) year discovery period, or (ii) the coverage shall be maintained for a minimum of five (5) years following the termination of this Agreement and the requirements of this section relating to such coverage shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. Attorney shall furnish City with the certificate(s) and applicable endorsements for ALL required insurance prior to City’s execution of this Agreement.
e. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Bests’ rating of no less than A:VII. This requirement may, however, be waived in individual cases for Errors and Omissions Coverages only; provided, however, DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 234 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
8 that in no event shall a carrier with a rating below B:IX be acceptable. f. Verification of Coverage: Attorney shall furnish City with certificates of insurance showing compliance with the above requirements and with original endorsements affecting all coverages required by this Agreement both prior to the execution of this Agreement, and during the pendency of this Agreement at any time upon request by City. The certificates and/or endorsements shall set forth a valid policy number for City, and shall indicate the Issue Date, Effective Date and Expiration Date. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements shall be forwarded to the City Representative.
g. Payment Withhold: City shall withhold payments to Attorney if the certificates of insurance and endorsements required in this section are canceled or Attorney otherwise ceases to be insured as required herein.

6. Indemnification.
a. Indemnity: Attorney shall fully indemnify and save harmless, City, its officers and employees, including without limitation the City Attorney, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, judgments, penalties and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by City’s staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (hereafter collectively referred to as “Liabilities”), to which any or all of them may be subjected, to the extent such Liabilities are caused by or result from any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Attorney, its subcontractors or agents, and their respective officers and employees, in connection with the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, whether or not the City, its officers or employees reviewed, accepted or approved any service or work product performed or provided by the Attorney, and whether or not such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment. b. Obligation to Defend: Attorney shall, upon City’s request, defend at Attorney’s sole cost any action, claim, suit, cause of action or portion thereof which asserts or alleges Liabilities to the extent such Liabilities are caused by or result from any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Attorney, its sub-attorneys, subcontractors or agents, and their respective officers and employees, in connection with the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, whether such action, claim, suit, cause of action or portion thereof is well founded or not. c. Insurance Policies; Intellectual Property Claims: The existence or acceptance by City of any of the insurance policies or coverages described in this Agreement DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 235 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
9 shall not affect or limit any of City’s rights under this section, nor shall the limits of such insurance limit the liability of Attorney hereunder. This section shall not apply to any intellectual property claims, actions, lawsuits or other proceedings subject to the provisions of Section 4 (Confidentiality of City Information) above.

The provisions of this section shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement.

7. Termination.
a. By City. City may terminate this Agreement at any time by written notice. After receiving such notice, Attorney will cease providing services. Attorney will cooperate with City in the orderly transfer of all related files and records to your new counsel.
b. By Attorney. Attorney may terminate this Agreement at any time with City’s consent or for good cause. Attorney may terminate this Agreement for any reason by giving to City Attorney not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of termination. The notice shall specify the effective date of and reason for the termination. Good cause exists if (a) any statement is not paid within ninety (90) days of its receipt; (b) City fails to meet any other obligation under this Agreement and continues in that failure for 15 days after Attorney sends written notice to City; (c) City has misrepresented or failed to disclose material facts to Attorney, refused to cooperate with Attorney, refused to follow Attorney’s advice on a material matter, or otherwise made Attorney’s representation unreasonably difficult; or (d) any other circumstance exists in which ethical rules of the legal profession mandate or permit termination, including situations where a conflict of interest arises. If Attorney terminates Services, City agree to execute a substitution of attorneys promptly and otherwise cooperate in effecting that termination.

Termination of this Agreement, whether by City or by Attorney, will not relieve the obligation to pay for services rendered and costs incurred before our services formally ceased.

8. General Provisions.
a. Independent Contractor.
i. It is understood and agreed that Attorney (including Attorney’s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee exists between the Parties hereto for any purpose whatsoever. Neither Attorney nor Attorney’s assigned personnel shall be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of City. City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to Attorney under the DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 236 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
10 provisions of this Agreement, and Attorney shall be issued an IRS Form 1099 for its services hereunder. As an independent contractor, Attorney hereby agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any of Attorney’s employees or by any third party, including but not limited to any state or federal agency, that an employer-employee relationship or a substitute therefor exists for any purpose whatsoever by reason of this Agreement or by reason of the nature and/or performance of any Services under this Agreement.
ii. It is further understood and agreed by the Parties hereto that Attorney, in the performance of its obligations hereunder, is subject to the control and direction of City as to the designation of tasks to be performed and the results to be accomplished by the Services agreed to be rendered and performed under this Agreement, but not as to the means, methods, or sequence used by Attorney for accomplishing such results. To the extent that Attorney obtains permission to, and does, use City facilities, space, equipment or support services in the performance of this Agreement, this use shall be at the Attorney’s sole discretion based on the Attorney’s determination that such use will promote Attorney’s efficiency and effectiveness. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the City does not require that Attorney use City facilities, equipment or support services or work in City locations in the performance of this Agreement.
iii. If, in the performance of this Agreement, any third persons are employed by Attorney, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Attorney. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement, all terms of employment, including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging, or any other terms of employment or requirements of law, shall be determined by Attorney. It is further understood and agreed that Attorney shall issue W-2 or 1099 Forms for income and employment tax purposes, for all of Attorney’s assigned personnel and subcontractors. b. Licenses; Permits, Etc.: Attorney represents and warrants that Attorney has all licenses, permits, City Business Operations Tax Certificate, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Attorney to practice its profession or provide any services under the Agreement. _____________
Attorney’s Initial
Attorney represents and warrants that Attorney shall, at its sole cost and expense, DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 237 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
11 keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Attorney to practice its profession or provide such Services. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Attorney is an out-of-state corporation, Attorney warrants and represents that it possesses a valid certificate of qualification to transact business in the State of California issued by the California Secretary of State pursuant to Section 2105 of the California Corporations Code.
c. Conflicts of Interest. Attorney represents and warrants that they have made a diligent effort to determine whether there are any actual or potential conflicts of interest that would preclude or interfere with Attorney’s performance of this Agreement, and that no such conflict of interest exists. Attorney shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against any and all liability, loss, expense and obligation arising directly or indirectly out of any breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. Attorney agrees to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City at all times during the performance of this Agreement.
d. Confidentiality of City Information. Attorney understands and agrees that during the course performing the services required by this Agreement, or in contemplation thereof, Attorney may have access to private or confidential information which may be owned or controlled by City and that such information may contain proprietary or confidential details, the disclosure of which to third parties may be damaging to City. Attorney agree that all information disclosed by City to Attorney shall be held in confidence and used only in performance of the services required by this Agreement. A violation of this section shall be a material violation of this Agreement and shall justify legal and/or equitable relief. e. Publicity. The City Representative shall serve as the point of contact for press information regarding all matters pertaining to Services performed by Attorney under this Agreement. Attorney will consult with and obtain approval of the City Representative before making any statement to any media outlet (whether radio, print, internet or television) about the Services.
f. Disqualification of Judges. At the option of the City Attorney, judges may be disqualified from hearing City litigation, and Attorney shall adhere to such decision of the City Attorney. In the event that Attorney is of the opinion that a judge ought to be disqualified, the City Attorney must be consulted in advance by Attorney, and Attorney must obtain the City Attorney’s written consent to such disqualification.
g. Equal Employment Opportunity. During the performance of this Agreement, Attorney, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest, agrees as follows:

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 238 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
12 i. Compliance With Regulations: Attorney shall comply with the Executive Order 11246 entitled “Equal Opportunity in Federal Employment”, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and 12086, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Chapter 60), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Regulations.”
ii. Nondiscrimination: Attorney, with regards to the work performed pursuant to this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, physical handicap or sexual orientation in selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. Attorney shall not participate either directly or indirectly in discrimination prohibited by the Regulations.
h. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
i. Waiver. Neither City acceptance of, or payment for, any Service or Additional Service performed by Attorney, nor any waiver by either Party of any default, breach or condition precedent, shall be construed as a waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent or any other right hereunder.
j. Enforcement of Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue of any litigation arising out of or connected with this Agreement shall lie exclusively in the state trial court or Federal District Court located in Stanislaus County in the State of California, and the Parties consent to jurisdiction over their persons and over the subject matter of any such litigation in such courts, and consent to service of process issued by such courts.
k. Attorneys’ Fees. In any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. l. Assignment Prohibited. The expertise and experience of Attorney are material considerations for this Agreement. City has a strong interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the obligations imposed on Attorney under this Agreement. In recognition of this interest, Attorney shall not assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement without the written consent of the City. Any attempted or purported assignment without City’s written consent shall be void and of no effect.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 239 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
13 m. Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either Party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

To: City of Modesto: To: Attorney:

Attention: City Attorney Attention: Bradley J. Swingle
1010 Tenth Street, 6th Floor
Modesto, CA 95353
1207 I Street
Modesto, CA 95353
Phone: (209) 577-5288
Fax: (209) 544-8260
Phone: (209) 522-2211
Fax: (209) 522-2980

9. Entire Agreement. This document, including all Exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. No alteration to the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless approved in writing by Attorney, and by City, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

10. Authority. The person signing this Agreement for Attorney hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of Attorney and to bind Attorney to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

11. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated as if set forth fully herein.
[Signatures on Next Page.]
DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 #12..
- 240 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By:___________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_______________________________
Joe Rodriguez, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
DocuSign Envelope ID: A993C6D9-969C-4164-91DF-88E608016EE6 6/20/2023
#12..
- 241 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Swingle Van Egmond & Heitlinger
15 ATTORNEY:

SWINGLE, VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER
a Professional Corporation
______________________________________
______________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
______________________________________
State I.D. No.
______________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This SECOND AMENDMENT to the Legal Services Agreement (this "SECOND AMENDMENT") is made and entered into on the 25th day of February, 2026 ("EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and between the CITY of MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation ("CITY"), and MEYERS NAVE a Professional Corporation ("ATTORNEY"), located at 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017. CITY and ATTORNEY are herinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES", and singularly as "PARTY".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("AGREEMENT") to provide legal advice and assistance in relation to the City's ordinance related to public assembly; and
WHEREAS, ATTORNEY is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by the AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY desire to amend the AGREEMENT for further service by increasing the previously approved amount of fees from $95,000 to $99,500.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the CITY OF MODESTO and MEYERS NAVE dated July 28, 2025, and amended on October 29, 2025, is amended as follows:

2. Entire Agreement. The PARTIES to this SECOND AMENDMENT understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated July 28, 2025, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this SECOND AMENDMENT. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the AGREEMENT between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this SECOND AMENDMENT. No alteration to the terms of this SECOND AMENDMENT shall be valid unless approved in writing by ATTORNEY and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

Docusign Envelope ID: 63C736F2-F4E1-4BB9-B46D-B8C634233201 #12..
- 243 -

3. Authority. The person signing this SECOND AMENDMENT for ATTORNEY hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this SECOND AMENDMENT on behalf of ATTORNEY and to bind ATTORNEY to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_____________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 63C736F2-F4E1-4BB9-B46D-B8C634233201 3/2/2026
#12..
- 244 -
ATTORNEY:
_____________________________________
a Professional Corporation
_____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
_____________________________________
State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT to the Legal Services (this "FIRST AMENDMENT") is made and entered into on the 29th day of October 2025 ("EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and between the CITY of MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation ("CITY"), and MEYERS NAVE a Professional Corporation ("ATTORNEY"), located at 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017. CITY and ATTORNEY are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES", and singularly as "PARTY".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY entered into a Legal Services Agreement ("AGREEMENT") to provide legal advice and assistance in relation to the City's ordinance related to public assembly; and
WHEREAS, ATTORNEY entered is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by the AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, CITY and ATTORNEY desire to amend the AGREEMENT for further service by increasing the previously approved amount of fees from $35,000 to $95,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the Legal Services Agreement between the CITY OF MODESTO and MEYERS NAVE dated July 28, 2025, is amended as follows:

2. Entire Agreement. The PARTIES to this FIRST AMENDMENT understand and agree that except as stated herein all terms and conditions of the original Agreement, dated July 28, 2025, remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this FIRST AMENDMENT. This document, including all exhibits, contain the entire amendment to the AGREEMENT between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this FIRST AMENDMENT. No alteration to the terms of this FIRST AMENDMENT shall be valid unless approved in writing by ATTORNEY and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provision of the Modesto City Code.

3. Authority. The person signing this FIRST AMENDMENT for ATTORNEY hereby represents and warrants that he/she is fully authorized to sign this FIRST AMENDMENT on behalf of ATTORNEY and to bind ATTORNEY to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

Docusign Envelope ID: E2CF5818-E8F6-49B6-8C45-98FF5B850B97 #12..
- 246 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By: _________________________________
Print name: Joseph P. Lopez
Title: City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_____________________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: E2CF5818-E8F6-49B6-8C45-98FF5B850B97 10/30/2025
#12..
- 247 -
ATTORNEY:
_____________________________________
a Professional Corporation
_____________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
_____________________________________
State I.D. No.
___________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

TYPE OF BUSINESS ENTITY (check one):
_____ Individual/Sole Proprietor
_____ Partnership
_____ Corporation
_____ Limited Liability Company
_____ Other (please specify: ______________)
______________________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
______________________________________
Title
______________________________________
Additional Signature (if required)
______________________________________
Title
Docusign Envelope ID: E2CF5818-E8F6-49B6-8C45-98FF5B850B97 principal
#12..
- 248 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
1 LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Legal Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into on the 28th day of July, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”), located at 1010 Tenth Street, Sixth Floor, Modesto, California 95353 and MEYERS NAVE, (“Attorney”), located at 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017. City and Attorney are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties,” and singularly as a “Party.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires Attorney’s services with respect to providing legal advice and assistance in relation to the City’s ordinance related to public assembly.

WHEREAS, Attorney is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, the public interest, economy and general welfare will be served by this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby agreed as follows:

1. Services.
a. Scope of Work: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Attorney shall provide to City the following services (“Services”):

Provide legal advice and assistance in relation to the City’s ordinance related to public assembly, including analysis of legal challenges and possible amendments.

Specific tasks including specific claims under the scope of work of this Agreement performed by Attorney will be assigned by City with written notice to Attorney. Within ten (10) days of receiving notice by City of a new task, Attorney shall provide City a budget for the requested task. Attorney must Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 249 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
2 receive written approval by City of the proposed budget prior to commencement of task. Total compensation for all tasks under this Agreement shall not exceed the total compensation under Section 2 of this Agreement. b. Term: This Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date and shall continue in effect until both Parties have fully performed their respective obligations under this Agreement unless sooner terminated as provided in Section

7. c. Partner in Charge: The partner in charge of the defense of City in assigned matters is Deborah Fox with assistance by Of Counsel Meg Rosequist. Attorney will utilize experienced associate attorneys and paralegals under supervision of the partner in charge. The partner in charge will be the contact person for City and will make himself/herself reasonable available to respond to questions from the City Attorney or City staff.

2. Fees and Costs.
a. Hourly Rates:

Principal $625/hour
Of Counsel $595/hour
Associate $500/hour
Paralegal $300/hour
The total of all fees paid to Attorney for the performance of all services set forth in Section 1 (hereafter the “Services”), and for all authorized Reimbursable Expenses (as defined hereafter), shall not exceed the total sum of Thirty-Five Thousand dollars ($35,000).
b. Reimbursable Expenses. City shall reimburse Attorney for the actual, reasonable and necessary expense of travel out of the Modesto metropolitan area, approved in advance, at $0.70 per mile. Attorney will not charge City for the cost of telephone calls or photocopying. Litigation costs and expenses for statutory fees, witness fees, reporters’ per diem and stenographic transcriptions, jury fees, and the expenses of serving process shall be advanced by Attorney and reimbursed by City. Expert consultants and witnesses may be retained by Attorney on terms acceptable to City, approved in advance by email or letter by the City Representative (as defined hereafter), in which case City shall reimburse Attorney or pay such consultants or experts directly.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 250 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
3 c. Billing:
i. Legal billings shall be submitted to City every thirty (30) days unless otherwise advised.
ii. Each task shall be distinctly and completely identified. In litigation matters, City will not pay invoices that contain block billing. Each billing entry must contain the initials of the individual performing the task, the nature of the task, the date it was performed, and the length of time it took.
iii. Costs under $1,000.00 shall be paid by Attorney and submitted with their normal billing.
iv. City reserves the right to audit all invoices.
v. Payments to Attorney shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of Attorney’s invoice, generally within sixty (60) days of receipt. Attorney shall be responsible for supplying all documentation necessary to verify the monthly billings to the satisfaction of City.
vi. In addition to the provisions stated elsewhere in this Agreement regarding the payment of fees, billing and budgeting, the following guidelines for billing apply:
(1) City expects each individual working on the matter for which Attorney is retained to have the necessary experience to perform the services required to protect or pursue City’s interests in the matter in a cost-effective manner, consistent with high professional and ethical standards.
(2) City expects Attorney to select the individual most suitable for the task required and the specific needs of the matter, and to use the maximum efficiencies available. Billings for services performed by the inappropriate level of personnel will be reduced by City based on rate adjustments for the appropriate level of personnel. (3) City will not pay for unnecessary review of texts, codes, rules of court, or other fundamental references. City will pay the hourly rate for specific legal research which is unique to the matter, assuming that Attorney has used maximum efficiencies and that Attorney has not already recently performed research in the same or very similar areas of law.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 251 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
4 (4) City acknowledges the benefit of communications between attorneys in the firm. City does, however, expect that intra-office conferences will only be held as needed, and will be kept to a minimum. Intra-office conferences shall be for the purpose of discussing strategy and legal issues which directly further the matter. City will not pay for conferences which are supervisorial, instructional or administrative. Any invoice which lists an intraoffice conference that does not meet these guidelines must contain a full explanation and is subject to reduction by City. City will not pay for “team meetings” and City will scrutinize all intra-office conferences for “value added” to the matter by the conference, for the number of individuals attending the conference, the length of the conference, the subjects discussed at the conference and who participated in it, and will, in City’s sole discretion, determine if such value has been added.
(5) City will not pay for local telephone calls, incoming facsimiles, postage, time spent on filing, calendaring, indexing pleadings, photocopying, secretarial proofreading, re-drafting due to substandard work, or opening, organizing or closing files. City will not pay for time billed by summer interns, time for more than one individual to attend a trial, hearing, court appearance, arbitration, mediation, deposition, third party meeting, conference call or similar event, unless otherwise approved by City in advance.
(6) Vague billing which does not contain sufficient information to allow City’s reviewer of the invoice to determine the nature of the task, the reason for the task, and the individual performing the task is subject to reduction by City.
(7) City will not reimburse for overtime, word processing, supplies, anything identified on an invoice as “miscellaneous,” or any other unidentified charges.
d. Budget:
i. Within ten (10) days of the Effective Date, Attorney shall provide City with a proposed budget for the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement. If Services involve tasks that have not yet been assigned by City, Attorney shall provide City with a proposed budget for all assigned new tasks with ten (10) days of receiving written notice from the City assigning Attorney the new task. Total compensation for all tasks under Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 252 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
5 this Agreement shall not exceed the total compensation under Section 2 of this Agreement. The budget shall include all projected fees and costs to be incurred by Attorney and necessary for completion of the Services necessary to conclude the representation. The budget shall be a good faith estimate and shall be as complete and detailed as reasonably possible, including such items as discovery and motions for trial, preparation of documents for transactional services, and anticipated research and investigations. The proposed budget shall identify the projected total hours that will be billed to each task, and the individual that are anticipated to be performing the task. Any deviation from the budget in excess of fifteen percent (15%), must be approved in advance by the City Attorney or designee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should it become reasonably apparent to Attorney that the actual billings will exceed Attorney’s initial estimate of anticipated legal costs and fees, Attorney shall immediately notify City thereof in advance and shall submit a revised written estimate for City’s approval.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 253 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
6 4. City Representative. The City Attorney, or the City Attorney’s designee, shall be the “City Representative” under this Agreement and shall administer this Agreement for City, including any payments hereunder. All Attorney questions pertaining to this Agreement shall be referred to the City Representative or the Representative’s designee.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 255 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
8 e. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Bests’ rating of no less than A:VII. This requirement may, however, be waived in individual cases for Errors and Omissions Coverages only; provided, however, that in no event shall a carrier with a rating below B:IX be acceptable. f. Verification of Coverage: Attorney shall furnish City with certificates of insurance showing compliance with the above requirements and with original endorsements affecting all coverages required by this Agreement both prior to the execution of this Agreement, and during the pendency of this Agreement at any time upon request by City. The certificates and/or endorsements shall set forth a valid policy number for City, and shall indicate the Issue Date, Effective Date and Expiration Date. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements shall be forwarded to the City Representative.
g. Payment Withhold: City shall withhold payments to Attorney if the certificates of insurance and endorsements required in this section are canceled or Attorney otherwise ceases to be insured as required herein.

6. Indemnification.
a. Indemnity: Attorney shall fully indemnify and save harmless, City, its officers and employees, including without limitation the City Attorney, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, judgments, penalties and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by City’s staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (hereafter collectively referred to as “Liabilities”), to which any or all of them may be subjected, to the extent such Liabilities are caused by or result from any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Attorney, its subcontractors or agents, and their respective officers and employees, in connection with the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, whether or not the City, its officers or employees reviewed, accepted or approved any service or work product performed or provided by the Attorney, and whether or not such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment. b. Obligation to Defend: Attorney shall, upon City’s request, defend at Attorney’s sole cost any action, claim, suit, cause of action or portion thereof which asserts or alleges Liabilities to the extent such Liabilities are caused by or result from any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Attorney, its sub-attorneys, subcontractors or agents, and their respective officers and employees, in connection with the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, whether Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 256 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
9 such action, claim, suit, cause of action or portion thereof is well founded or not. c. Insurance Policies; Intellectual Property Claims: The existence or acceptance by City of any of the insurance policies or coverages described in this Agreement shall not affect or limit any of City’s rights under this section, nor shall the limits of such insurance limit the liability of Attorney hereunder. This section shall not apply to any intellectual property claims, actions, lawsuits or other proceedings subject to the provisions of Section 4 (Confidentiality of City Information) above.

The provisions of this section shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Termination of this Agreement, whether by City or by Attorney, will not relieve the obligation to pay for services rendered and costs incurred before our services formally ceased.

8. General Provisions.
a. Independent Contractor.
i. It is understood and agreed that Attorney (including Attorney’s employees) Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 257 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
10 is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee exists between the Parties hereto for any purpose whatsoever. Neither Attorney nor Attorney’s assigned personnel shall be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of City. City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to Attorney under the provisions of this Agreement, and Attorney shall be issued an IRS Form 1099 for its services hereunder. As an independent contractor, Attorney hereby agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any of Attorney’s employees or by any third party, including but not limited to any state or federal agency, that an employer-employee relationship or a substitute therefor exists for any purpose whatsoever by reason of this Agreement or by reason of the nature and/or performance of any Services under this Agreement.
ii. It is further understood and agreed by the Parties hereto that Attorney, in the performance of its obligations hereunder, is subject to the control and direction of City as to the designation of tasks to be performed and the results to be accomplished by the Services agreed to be rendered and performed under this Agreement, but not as to the means, methods, or sequence used by Attorney for accomplishing such results. To the extent that Attorney obtains permission to, and does, use City facilities, space, equipment or support services in the performance of this Agreement, this use shall be at the Attorney’s sole discretion based on the Attorney’s determination that such use will promote Attorney’s efficiency and effectiveness. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the City does not require that Attorney use City facilities, equipment or support services or work in City locations in the performance of this Agreement.
iii. If, in the performance of this Agreement, any third persons are employed by Attorney, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Attorney. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement, all terms of employment, including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging, or any other terms of employment or requirements of law, shall be determined by Attorney. It is further understood and agreed that Attorney shall issue W-2 or 1099 Forms for income and employment tax purposes, for all of Attorney’s assigned personnel and subcontractors. b. Licenses; Permits, Etc.: Attorney represents and warrants that Attorney has all licenses, permits, City Business Operations Tax Certificate, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Attorney to practice Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 258 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
11 its profession or provide any services under the Agreement. _____________
Attorney’s Initial
Attorney represents and warrants that Attorney shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Attorney to practice its profession or provide such Services. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Attorney is an out-of-state corporation, Attorney warrants and represents that it possesses a valid certificate of qualification to transact business in the State of California issued by the California Secretary of State pursuant to Section 2105 of the California Corporations Code.
c. Conflicts of Interest. Attorney represents and warrants that they have made a diligent effort to determine whether there are any actual or potential conflicts of interest that would preclude or interfere with Attorney’s performance of this Agreement, and that no such conflict of interest exists. Attorney shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against any and all liability, loss, expense and obligation arising directly or indirectly out of any breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. Attorney agrees to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City at all times during the performance of this Agreement.
d. Confidentiality of City Information. Attorney understands and agrees that during the course performing the services required by this Agreement, or in contemplation thereof, Attorney may have access to private or confidential information which may be owned or controlled by City and that such information may contain proprietary or confidential details, the disclosure of which to third parties may be damaging to City. Attorney agrees that all information disclosed by City to Attorney shall be held in confidence and used only in performance of the services required by this Agreement. A violation of this section shall be a material violation of this Agreement and shall justify legal and/or equitable relief. e. Publicity. The City Representative shall serve as the point of contact for press information regarding all matters pertaining to Services performed by Attorney under this Agreement. Attorney will consult with and obtain approval of the City Representative before making any statement to any media outlet (whether radio, print, internet or television) about the Services.
f. Disqualification of Judges. At the option of the City Attorney, judges may be disqualified from hearing City litigation, and Attorney shall adhere to such decision of the City Attorney. In the event that Attorney is of the opinion that a Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 259 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
12 judge ought to be disqualified, the City Attorney must be consulted in advance by Attorney, and Attorney must obtain the City Attorney’s written consent to such disqualification.
g. Equal Employment Opportunity. During the performance of this Agreement, Attorney, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest, agrees as follows:
i. Compliance With Regulations: Attorney shall comply with the Executive Order 11246 entitled “Equal Opportunity in Federal Employment”, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and 12086, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Chapter 60), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Regulations.”
ii. Nondiscrimination: Attorney, with regards to the work performed pursuant to this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, physical handicap or sexual orientation in selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. Attorney shall not participate either directly or indirectly in discrimination prohibited by the Regulations.
h. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.
i. Waiver. Neither City acceptance of, or payment for, any Service or Additional Service performed by Attorney, nor any waiver by either Party of any default, breach or condition precedent, shall be construed as a waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent or any other right hereunder.
j. Enforcement of Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue of any litigation arising out of or connected with this Agreement shall lie exclusively in the state trial court or Federal District Court located in Stanislaus County in the State of California, and the Parties consent to jurisdiction over their persons and over the subject matter of any such litigation in such courts, and consent to service of process issued by such courts.
k. Attorneys’ Fees. In any action to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall recover its reasonable attorneys' fees.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 260 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
13 l. Assignment Prohibited. The expertise and experience of Attorney are material considerations for this Agreement. City has a strong interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the obligations imposed on Attorney under this Agreement. In recognition of this interest, Attorney shall not assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement without the written consent of the City. Any attempted or purported assignment without City’s written consent shall be void and of no effect.
m. Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either Party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

To: City of Modesto: To: Meyers Nave
Attention: City Attorney Attention: Deborah Fox
1010 Tenth Street, 6th Floor
Modesto, CA 95353
707 Wilshire Blvd. 24th Floor
Phone: (209) 577-5288
Fax: (209) 544-8260
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Phone: (213) 626-2906

11. Exhibits. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated as if set forth fully herein.
[Signatures on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 261 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below.

CITY OF MODESTO,
A Municipal Corporation
By:___________________________________
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
APPROVED TO AS FORM:
_____________________________________
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
_______________________________
Matthew Braley, Risk Manager
[Signatures Continued on Next Page.]
Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 #12..
- 262 -
Legal Services Agreement
City of Modesto and Meyers Nave
15 ATTORNEY:

MEYERS NAVE
a Professional Corporation
______________________________________
______________________________________
Federal I.D. No.
______________________________________
State I.D. No.
______________________________________
City of Modesto Business Op. Tax Cert. No.

TYPE OF BUSINESS ENTITY (check one):
_____ Individual/Sole Proprietor
_____ Partnership
_____ Corporation
_____ Limited Liability Company
_____ Other (please specify: ______________)
______________________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
______________________________________
Title
______________________________________
Additional Signature (if required)
______________________________________
Title
Docusign Envelope ID: 9CF4B536-901B-4E8D-B3F5-DD7DE7EA2904 principal
#12..
- 263 -
California Levine Act Disclosure
California Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act", prohibits City “officers” from participating in any action related to a license, permit, or other entitlement for use (a “proceeding”) if such member accepts, solicits, or directs political contributions from a party to the proceeding or their agent totaling more than $500 while the proceeding is pending before the agency, and for twelve (12) months following the date a decision concerning the proceeding has been made. The Levine Act also requires disclosure of such contribution by a party to the proceeding.

Section 84308(a)(4) of the Levine Act defines an "officer" as follows: “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency. The term “officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18438.1, which states:

An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a decision in the license, permit, or entitlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency of officers who may do so, and:
(1) Serve in an elected position, including an official appointed to an elected position due to an interim vacancy or an election otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the position; (2) Serve as a member of a board or commission;
(3) Serve as the chief executive of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or (4)Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elective office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

A list of Modesto City Council Board Members can be found online at: Modesto City Council https://modestogov.com/706/Council-Members (modestogov.com). The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City officer prior to answering the following questions:

1. Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer, in the twelve (12) months preceding the date of the submission of your proposals or the anticipated date of any Council action related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please identify the Councilmember(s):
___ NO

2. Do you, or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any City officer in the twelve (12) months following any Council action related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please identify the Councilmember(s):
___ NO
#12..
- 264 -
Answering YES to either of the questions above does not preclude the City of Modesto from awarding a contract to your firm or taking any subsequent action related to the contract. It may, however, preclude the identified City officer from participating in any actions related to such contract.

HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name
4/2/26
Swingle, Van Egmond, et. al.
#12..
- 265 -
California Levine Act Disclosure
California Government Code SecƟon 84308, also known as the "Levine Act", prohibits City “officers” from parƟcipaƟng in any acƟon related to a license, permit, or other enƟtlement for use (a “proceeding”) if such member accepts, solicits, or directs poliƟcal contribuƟons from a party to the proceeding or their agent totaling more than $500 while the proceeding is pending before the agency, and for twelve (12) months following the date a decision concerning the proceeding has been made. The Levine Act also requires disclosure of such contribuƟon by a party to the proceeding.

SecƟon 84308(a)(4) of the Levine Act defines an "officer" as follows: “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elecƟve office in an agency. The term “officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. SecƟon 18438.1, which states:

An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, parƟcipate in making, or in any way aƩempt to use their official posiƟon to influence a decision in the license, permit, or enƟtlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency of officers who may do so, and:
(1) Serve in an elected posiƟon, including an official appointed to an elected posiƟon due to an interim vacancy or an elecƟon otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the posiƟon; (2) Serve as a member of a board or commission;
(3) Serve as the chief execuƟve of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or (4)Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other enƟtlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elecƟve office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

A list of Modesto City Council Board Members can be found online at: Modesto City Council hƩps://modestogov.com/706/Council-Members (modestogov.com). The party making this cerƟficaƟon is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a poliƟcal contribuƟon is a City officer prior to answering the following quesƟons:

1. Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any poliƟcal contribuƟons of more than $500 to any City officer, in the twelve (12) months preceding the date of the submission of your proposals or the anƟcipated date of any Council acƟon related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please idenƟfy the Councilmember(s):
_X_ NO

2. Do you, or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, anƟcipate or plan to make any poliƟcal contribuƟon of more than $500 to any City officer in the twelve (12) months following any Council acƟon related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please idenƟfy the Councilmember(s):
_X_ NO
#12..
- 266 -
Answering YES to either of the quesƟons above does not preclude the City of Modesto from awarding a contract to your firm or taking any subsequent acƟon related to the contract. It may, however, preclude the idenƟfied City officer from parƟcipaƟng in any acƟons related to such contract.

HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

April 2nd , 2026.
______________________
Date Signature of authorized individual

Deborah J Fox / Meyers Nave
___________________________
Company/Applicant Name
#12..
- 267 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
Date: March 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Scotty Douglass, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Confirming Detachment of Non-contiguous City of Modesto Property CONTACT: Scotty Douglass, Deputy City Manager, [email protected], 209-571-5571
DESCRIPTION:

Consider confirming the detachment of a non-contiguous City property located at Frazine Rd. (133-001-026) and Grimes Ave (017-012-012), reverting the property back to unincorporated status within the County of Stanislaus and authorizing application to the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission to annex the territory back to the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District. (Funding Source: Utilities Fund) STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the 2025-2026 City of Modesto Strategic Plan Initiatives, Goal D: Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

Former Well Site No. 310 is located at Frazine Rd. (133-001-026). The well has been destroyed in accordance with Modesto Municipal Code and California Well Standards Bulletin 74-90. The Utilities Department recommends selling the property as it is no longer required for City use. Former Well Site No. 232 is located at Grimes Ave (017- 012-012), and this well is inactive.

DISCUSSION:

The Frazine Rd. (133-001-026) and Grimes Ave (017-012-012) were purchased as a part of the Del Este Water System (Del Este) in 1995. The wells are no longer used, and any pertinent equipment has been removed off the Frazine site and is to be removed from the Grimes Ave site. Frazine site is now vacant, and Grimes Ave site has #13..
- 268 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Confirming Detachment of Non-contiguous City of Modesto Property

Page 2 of 3 ends

inactive residual equipment, which the City does not plan on using in the future. In August of 2024, the City of Modesto inventoried the real property assets owned by the City and the City of Modesto Redevelopment Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”).

On August 27, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-309, the City Council declared certain properties as “surplus land” to continue the process of evaluating surplus and/or underutilized properties in its portfolio, and to commence the process for the conveyance of those properties. Furthermore, on September 23, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-334, the City Council declared certain properties from the “surplus land” list as exempt surplus so that the City may begin the process to sell or lease such properties through the Surplus Land Act Process.

Thereafter, a broker’s opinion of value was prepared by PMZ Real Estate to establish an appropriate sale price, which has been met by the prospective buyer. On February 24, 2026, by Resolution No. 2026-42, the City Council approved the sale of 10,000 square feet of surplus exempt property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 133- 001-026, located at Frazine Rd. in the amount of $75,000 to the adjacent property owner. The city plans to sell Grimes Ave (017-012-012) in the near future according to the same above-mentioned process.

Upon this sale of the property, it will revert to unincorporated status as required by Section 56742(e); and as a result, a City resolution is required for this reversion. When this property was annexed into the City, it was also removed from the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District. The reversion process now requires that the City authorize an application to annex the property back into the Fire Protection District.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact related to this item.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This item is not required to be reviewed by Council Committee, because this item is administrative in nature.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

This item does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 and requires no environmental review.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution confirming the detachment of non-contiguous City properties located at Frazine Rd. (APN 133-001-026) and Grimes Ave (APN 017-012-012), reverting the properties back to unincorporated status within the County of Stanislaus and authorizing application to the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission to annex the territory back to the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute any and all necessary documents required for City #13..
- 269 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Confirming Detachment of Non-contiguous City of Modesto Property

Page 3 of 3 ends

detachment and application for annexation to the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District.

Approved by:

Scotty Douglass, Deputy City Manager
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution
#13..
- 270 -
1 April 7, 2026/CMO/SDouglass/Item # 2026-xxx

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DETACHMENT OF NON-CONTIGUOUS
CITY PROPERTIES LOCATED AT FRAZINE RD. (APN 133-001-026) AND GRIMES AVE. (APN 017-012-012), REVERTING THE PROPERTIES BACK TO

UNINCORPORATED STATUS WITHIN THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS AND

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE STANISLAUS LOCAL AGENCY

FORMATION COMMISSION TO ANNEX THE TERRIORY BACK TO THE

STANISLAUS CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE

ANY AND ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR CITY

DETACHMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE

STANISLAUS CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City of Modesto owns real property on Frazine Rd. (133- 001-026) and Grimes Ave. (017-012-012); and
WHEREAS, these properties were purchased by the City from the Del Este Water Company in 1995 for Well Site No. 310 and Well Site No. 232; and WHEREAS, Well Site No. 311 was abandoned and destroyed in accordance with the Modesto Municipal Code and California Well Standards.

Well Site No. 232 is currently inactive; and
WHEREAS, in August 2024, the City of Modesto inventoried the real property assets owned by the City and the City of Modesto Redevelopment Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”). On August 27, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-309, the City Council declared certain properties as “surplus land” to continue the process of evaluating surplus and/or underutilized properties in its portfolio, and to commence the process for the conveyance of those properties; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-334, the City Council declared certain properties from the “surplus land” list as exempt surplus #13..
- 271 -
2 April 7, 2026/CMO/SDouglass/Item # 2026-xxx
so that the City may begin the process to sell or lease such properties through the Surplus Land Act Process; and
WHEREAS, a broker’s opinion of value was prepared by PMZ Real Estate to establish an appropriate sale price for Frazine Rd. (133-001-026), which has been met by a prospective buyer. Any proceeds from the sale of this surplus property will be deposited into the fund from which the property was originally purchased; and
WHEREAS, a broker’s opinion of value has been prepared by PMZ Real Estate to establish an appropriate sale price for Grimes Ave (017-012-012), which shall be met by a future prospective buyer. Any proceeds from the sale of this surplus property will be deposited into the fund from which the property was originally purchased; and
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, by Resolution No. 2026-42, the City Council approving the sale of 10,000 square feet of surplus exempt property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 133-001-026, located at Frazine Rd. in the amount of $75,000 to the adjacent property owner; and WHEREAS, the detachment of territory from the City and annexation to the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District are considered exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under the General Rule, Section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there will not be a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves the detachment of non-contiguous City #13..
- 272 -
3 April 7, 2026/CMO/SDouglass/Item # 2026-xxx
properties located a Frazine Rd. (APN 133-001-026) and Grimes Ave. (APN 017- 012-012) and reverting the properties back to unincorporated status within the County of Stanislaus.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is authorized to execute any and all necessary documents required for the City detachment and application for annexation to the Stanislaus consolidated fire protection district.

The foregoing resolution was introduced in a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April 2026, by Councilmember ________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ______, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, City
Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#13..
- 273 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
Date: March 18, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Stephan Christensen, Office of Performance Management and Budget Director
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report CONTACT: Kaceey Culbertson, Budget Manager, [email protected], 209-571-5855
DESCRIPTION:

Consider accepting the informational Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report and approving the recommended budget adjustments to the major General Fund revenues and expenditures amending the Fiscal Year 2025- 26 Annual Operating Budget. (Funding Source: General Fund) STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

This item supports the City of Modesto 2025-2026 Strategic Plan focus on Governance and Service Delivery under Goal H: Achieve Long-Term Financial Sustainability.

BACKGROUND:

Periodically, the Budget Division in the Office of Performance Management & Budget presents updates to the Finance Committee and Council on the status of the General Fund. This update often includes recommended adjustments to the Annual Operating, Capital Improvement and Multi-year non-Capital Project budgets. The purpose of the update is to summarize financial results through the mid-year and to present any recommended adjustments to the Operating Revenue and Expenditure budgets as needed. In addition, the update will highlight any potential issues, concerns, or items of interest, as needed.
#14..
- 274 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report

Page 2 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION:

The attached Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update report focuses on the performances of the City’s General Fund major revenue sources, as well as the various expenditures across the operating departments. The revenue data gathered through February 28, 2026, begins to show important trends in the revenue and expenditure data which has provided important insight into the projections that are described within the report pertaining to the General Fund’s fiscal year-end.

To date, the General Fund has received 49% of the budgeted revenues through February 28, 2026. This is slightly behind the normal rate of receipts at this time of the year for the General Fund when compared to the prior fiscal year. In the prior year, 54% of the revenues had been receipted through February of 2025.

The main contributing factor to the lower total receipt of revenues is the lag time that is experienced in the Sales Tax category. Sales Tax is receipted two months in arrears.

This means that the revenue received for the month of February will reflect actual sales tax receipts for the month of December 2025. In terms of the overall percentage shown in the attached report, this lag time contributes to some of the delays in revenues being received.

Details about each major revenue category can be found within the report. Major revenues show an overall increase of $451 thousand. This is mainly due to a large projected increase in the Sales Tax category ($1.3M) and the Utility User Tax category ($557K) being offset by decreases in the Business License/Mill Tax (-$1.3M) and Cannabis Tax (-$204K) categories.

Sales Tax is showing signs of growth as receipts have been bolstered by inflation that has increased the costs of goods sold from consumer spending. This category will continue to be monitored as there are still concerns about the future pace of growth with looming tariff fluctuations and the geopolitical climate and potential future impacts on Sales Tax. The Utility User Tax has slight increases that have been caused by the increases in costs of gas, electricity and water utilities. These increases equate to additional tax revenue that is remitted by providers to the City. The positive gains in these two categories have been offset by decreases in Business License Mill/Tax (BLMT) and Cannabis Tax revenues. BLMT has decreased largely due to gross receipts from businesses being much lower through February than what was budgeted for the fiscal year. Mill Tax applies a tax on the portion of gross receipts for commercial retail, service and home-based businesses and to date these are much lower than the prior year. For Cannabis Tax, the revenues for the current fiscal year show another year of decline for annual revenues compared to the prior year. This revenue source is beginning to show a steady leveling out of what appears to be annual revenues of about $3.2M.

When compared to the total amount expended as a percentage, overall actual expenditure for City departments is slightly ahead of their expenditure budgets. #14..
- 275 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report

Page 3 of 4 ends

Additionally, the General Fund has expended 68% of the total expense budget. This is slightly higher than the expected amount of 67% for this point in the fiscal year.

However, there are contributing factors associated with the 1% difference as indicated.

The primary reason for the variance is due to the full payment of the CalPERS unfunded liability that was made in July at the beginning of the fiscal year. This payment resulted in expenditure showing higher to date as the payment is made in full at the beginning of the fiscal year to save on interest costs. There have also been other increased costs in departments due to increased costs of goods and contract services that are inflating year-to-date spending.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This item contains multiple recommendations from staff to increase and decrease major General Fund revenue categories to correspond with the estimated projections for the fiscal year-end. The recommended revenue increases/decreases are as follows:

Category
Current
Budget
Increase/
(Decrease)
Revised
Amount
Account -
Description
Sales Tax $35,904,490 $1,330,262 $37,234,752 41201 - Sales and Use Taxes Utility User Tax $23,619,649 $557,119 $24,176,768 41203 - Utility Users Tax Transient
Occupancy Tax $3,546,585 $94,188 $3,640,773
41204 - Transient Occupancy
Tax
Business
License/Mill Tax $18,690,534 $(1,326,252) $17,364,282
41402 - Business License Tax -
Mill Tax
Cannabis Tax $3,400,793 $(204,048) $3,196,745 41406 - Cannabis Tax Grand Totals $85,162,051 $451,269 $85,613,320
The total recommended increases/decreases across the major General Fund revenues have a net increase impact in the amount of $451,269 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and are explained in more detail in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update report.

No increases/decreases are being recommended for General Fund expenditure budgets currently. However, staff will continue to monitor the General Fund expenditure budget and will bring any changes of note to Council via the monthly budget adjustment process.
#14..
- 276 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report

Page 4 of 4 ends

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

This item does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 and requires no environmental review.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Finance Committee on March 23, 2026, and the Committee recommended forwarding the item to Council for approval.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution accepting the information Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report and approving the recommended budget adjustments to the major General Fund revenues and expenditures amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget.

Approved by:

Stephan Christensen, Office of Performance
Management and Budget Director
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update Report #14..
- 277 -
04/07/2026/OPMB/SChristensen/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE INFORMATIONAL FISCAL YEAR
2025-26 MID-YEAR GENERAL FUND UPDATE REPORT AND

APPROVING THE RECOMMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO

THE MAJOR GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET
WHEREAS, periodically the Budget Division in the Office of Performance Management & Budget presents updates to the Finance Committee and Council on the status of the General Fund, including adjustments to the Annual Operating, Capital Improvement, and Multi-year Project budgets, and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 General Fund Mid-Year Update Report focuses on the performances of the City’s General Fund major revenue sources, as well as the various expenditures across the operating departments, and
WHEREAS, revenue data gathered through February 28, 2025, shows that the City has receipted 49% of the budgeted revenues and overall expenditures have expended 68% of their total budgets in the General Fund, and WHEREAS, staff has made multiple recommendations for revenue adjustments due to the current estimated forecasted receipts for revenues such as Sales Tax, Utility User Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax, Business License/Mill Tax, and Cannabis Tax as shown in the chart below:
#14..
- 278 -
04/07/2026/OPMB/SChristensen/Item X 2 2026-XX
Category
Current
Budget
Increase/
(Decrease)
Revised
Amount
Account -
Description
Sales Tax $35,904,490 $1,330,262 $37,234,752 41201 - Sales and Use Taxes Utility User
Tax $23,619,649 $557,119 $24,176,768 41203 - Utility Users Tax Transient
Occupancy
Tax $3,546,585 $94,188 $3,640,773
41204 - Transient Occupancy
Tax
Business
License/Mill
Tax $18,690,534 $(1,326,252) $17,364,282
41402 - Business License
Tax - Mill Tax
Cannabis Tax $3,400,793 $(204,048) $3,196,745 41406 - Cannabis Tax Grand Totals $85,162,051 $451,269 $85,613,320
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it accepts the informational Fiscal Year 2025-26 General Fund MidYear Update Report and approves the recommended budget adjustments to the major General Fund revenues and expenditures, as noted above and in the report, amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to take the necessary steps to implement the provisions of this resolution.
#14..
- 279 -
04/07/2026/OPMB/SChristensen/Item X 3 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April 2026, by Councilmember _________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ______, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following votes:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#14..
- 280 -
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

MID-YEAR GENERAL
FUND UPDATE REPORT:

The Mid-Year General Fund Update Report is created by the Office of Performance Management & Budget (OPMB) - Budget Division through the direction of the City Manager to provide a general update concerning the health of the City’s General Fund as well as any adjustments to its revenues and/or
expenditures. Information contained within this report seeks to provide data on the performance of the General Fund as the revenues are collected, and the expenditures continue through February of the current fiscal year.

Please note that the expenditures and revenues reported herein are through February 28, 2026, and may not reflect final figures for the month.

Created by the
OPMB - Budget
Division
#14..
- 281 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
1 | P a g e
General Fund Revenues
(Overview)
#14..
- 282 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
2 | P a g e
eneral Fund revenues are classified into three categories: tax revenues, fee revenues, and other departmental revenues. Through February 28, 2026, the total General Fund revenues receipted are $99.6 million or approximately 49% of the total budgeted revenues for Fiscal Year 2025-26. This is slightly behind the normal rate of receipts at this time of the year for the General Fund. For comparison, at the same time last fiscal year, the City had received 54% of the total budgeted revenues (approximately $104.2 million). The main reason for the decline in the percentage of receipts is due to the typical lag in terms of the timing of receipts in revenues for sales tax and timing of larger payments for Franchise Fees and Utility Users Tax. Some of the decline in the percentage of receipts is also attributed to a slight decline in departmental revenues, some of which is tied to timing for revenue received for contracts and also a slight lag in rental revenue, which is expected to see an increase over the next few months.

The revenues received to date are spread across all three major revenue types and are broken down further in the chart below:
*Please note that Departmental Revenues category includes an amount of $6.9M in revenue for the Oakdale Fire Contract, $8.0M in revenue for the Ceres Fire Contract, $413K in revenue for Stanislaus Consolidated Fire contract, $353K in revenue for Turlock Fire contract, and $2.3M in revenue for Salida Fire contract which are all used to pay for offsetting expenditures.

Category
Current
Budget
Actuals (as of
Feb 28, 2026)
Amount
Outstanding
% Received to
Date
Tax Revenues:

Property Tax - Property $ 24,573,189 $ 14,215,354 $ 10,357,835 58% Property Tax - VLF Swap $ 24,839,088 $ 12,189,855 $ 12,649,233 49% Sales Tax $ 35,904,490 $ 18,817,079 $ 17,087,411 52%
Utility Users Tax $ 23,619,649 $ 13,577,675 $ 10,041,974 57% Transient Occupancy Tax $ 3,546,585 $ 2,048,381 $ 1,498,204 58% Business License/Mill Tax $ 18,690,534 $ 9,024,656 $ 9,665,878 48% Cannabis Tax $ 3,400,793 $ 1,682,876 $ 1,717,917 49%
Total Tax Revenues $ 134,574,328 $ 71,555,876 $ 63,018,452 53% Fee Revenues:

Franchise Fees $ 5,977,722 $ 1,978,123 $ 3,999,599 33%
Motor Vehicle Fees $ 525,000 $ 387,945 $ 137,055 74%
Construction Revenues $ 3,331,668 $ 2,006,484 $ 1,325,184 60% Total Fee Revenues $ 9,834,390 $ 4,372,552 $ 5,461,838 44% Other Revenues:

Departmental Revenues $ 39,805,102 $ 23,689,839 $ 16,115,263 60% Measure H (General Fund Budget Structural Deficit) $ 11,664,984 $ - $ 11,664,984 0% Additional Measure H Sales Tax (Supplemented for Lost ARPA Rev) $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 0% Transfers In $ 3,398,484 $ - $ 3,398,484 0%
Total Other Revenues $ 56,868,570 $ 23,689,839 $ 33,178,731 42% Total Revenues $ 201,277,288 $ 99,618,267 $ 101,659,021 49% G
#14..
- 283 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
3 | P a g e
Tax Revenues
Tax revenues represent 67% of the total General Fund operating revenue budget at $134.57 million of the total $201.28 million revenue operating budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. As of February 28, 2026, $71.56 million of the budgeted $134.57 million has been received to date. This represents approximately 53% of the tax revenue budget being received. This is on target for this point-in-time during the year. Sales Tax is coming in higher overall than what was anticipated when the budget was adopted and is being impacted by the local economy and what is occurring with sustained inflation and increased prices on goods and services. The increased prices on goods and services have impacted the sales tax amount to be received and consumer spending has continued to remain steady.

Fee Revenues
Fee Revenues represent 4.9% of the total General Fund operating revenue budget at $9.8 million of the total $201.28 million revenue operating budget for Fiscal Year 2025-

26. Most of the fee revenues are generated from Franchise Fees which are collected as “rent” paid for the use of public right of way. These are negotiated costs to allow utility companies (telecommunications, natural gas, garbage, etc.) to access structures like transmission towers, sewage systems, and roads. The City collects approximately $5.98 million in franchise fees annually. Through February 28, 2026, $1.9 million has been collected in this revenue category (33% of the budgeted amount). This amount is below what is expected for this time of the year due to the timing of a payment in the Garbage Franchise Fee category. The payment is expected to come in the month of March/April and is anticipated to get this revenue category back on track with estimated budget amounts.

Construction Revenues
Construction revenues are a sub-category of Fee Revenues and include all revenues collected in the Building Safety Division and the Planning Division in the Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD). These revenues represent approximately

1.7% of the total budgeted General Fund operating revenues for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

They are budgeted at $3.3 million as of February 28, 2026.

Construction revenues received through February 28, 2026, are approximately 60% of the budgeted amount. This is slightly behind the amounts collected in the previous fiscal year in terms of percentage collected (60% vs 66%), but higher in terms of total revenues ($2.0M vs $1.69M). Construction revenues continue to be strong, and it is anticipated that these revenues will continue to build through the spring and summer as there is continued activity in the building industry in this area. This is especially #14..
- 284 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
4 | P a g e
important as the City continues to look toward strengthening its economic development endeavors.

Other Revenues
Other Revenues represent 28% of the total General Fund operating revenue budget at $56.8 million of the total $201.28 million revenue operating budget for Fiscal Year 2025-

26. Other revenues include any revenue source that is received by departments and is not included in the tax or fee revenues categories as well as transfers into the General Fund from other funds.

These revenues are accounted for under the generating department and include a wide range of revenue sources such as direct charge revenue (all departments), fire inspection fees (Fire Department), league and facility rental fees (Parks, Recreation & Neighborhoods), and the McHenry Tax Sharing Agreement revenues (NonDepartmental). #14..
- 285 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
5 | P a g e
General Fund Revenues
(Analysis)
#14..
- 286 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
6 | P a g e
Property Tax Revenues Analysis
As of February 28, 2026, the first payment has been received in one of the subcategories that makes up the property tax revenues, Property Tax – Property. The first payment for the second sub-category, Property Tax – Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Swap has also been received. These two payments are significant indicators of how the property tax revenues for the entire fiscal year will perform. With both payments receipted a clearer picture can be made for this major tax revenue category for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Property Tax – Property
In Fiscal Year 2025-26, the first installment of property tax was received in January in the amount of $12.17 million. This first payment is receipted under current year secured property taxes and is the bulk of the property tax revenue that is received. Other revenues that fall under Property Tax – Property include, current year unsecured, delinquent, delinquent unsecured, supplemental roll, and Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) allocation. These revenue accounts make up the total amounts that sum up to the total Property Tax – Property amount received by the City.

With the first payment received, estimates for fiscal year-end 2025-26 show that the amounts for this revenue category are on target with the adopted budget amounts.

Year-end estimates show that a total of $24.5 million is expected to be received based off the $12.17 million first payment which tracks with estimates for the current budgeted amount for Property Tax – Property. Staff recommend keeping the current budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 based upon estimates for remaining revenues to be receipted.

Staff are not recommending any changes to this category currently.

Property Tax – VLF Swap
Property Tax – VLF Swap is the second portion of the revenues that makes up the total Property Tax category for the City. This revenue source came into effect with the passing of the State of California Budget in 2004 by then Governor Schwarzenegger.

The budget included a swap of city and county vehicle license fee revenues for an additional property tax share. These additional VLF backfill funds, which equate to a dollar-for-dollar like amount of property taxes, also increase annually in proportion to the growth in assessed valuation in the local jurisdictions.

The first Property Tax – VLF Swap payment for the City has been received in the amount of $12.19 million in the month of February. The amount received in the first payment is typically around 50% of the total payment that will be received for the year.

With the Property Tax – VLF Swap revenue coming in close to the targeted budget with #14..
- 287 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
7 | P a g e
this first payment, staff recommends keeping the current budget for Fiscal Year 2025-

26. Staff are not recommending any changes to this category currently.

Property Tax Charts:

Annual Property Tax
Annual Property Tax – Property
#14..
- 288 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
8 | P a g e
Annual Property Tax – VLF – Swap
The preceding property tax charts show the trends that have been occurring since fiscal year 2016/2017. There has been steady growth in both the Property Tax and VLF swap categories of this revenue source. At this point, the growth is expected to continue as the housing market remains strong, and valuation of homes continues to grow because of the increased prices of homes. This revenue source will continue to be monitored as there will be a point in time when the prices will begin to decline as the supply of houses begins to exceed the demand for homes in terms of buyers, and the City will want to stay ahead of any revenue decreases as much as possible. #14..
- 289 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
9 | P a g e
Sales Tax Revenues Analysis
As of February 28, 2026, Sales Tax revenues received to date are approximately $18.82 million. This represents 52% of the total Sales Tax budgeted for the fiscal year ($35.9 million). Sales Tax is received by the City monthly but is receipted within a twomonth lag time, meaning that the receipts received in any particular month are for the actual sales tax receipts two months prior. For example, sales tax revenues accounted for in the month of February are for actual sales tax receipts made in the month of December (two months prior). This continuous two-month lag time is something that is closely monitored by the OPMB - Budget Division staff as estimates are created for fiscal year-end.

In Fiscal Year 2025-26, there have been several categories of Sales Tax that have increased in the last few quarters for the City. These have been in the industries of general retail, transportation, and to a lesser extent restaurants and hotels. Certain subcategories within the larger areas of industries have also seen decline in the third quarter of 2025 (covering the months of July through September). These areas included fuel and service stations, miscellaneous retail, and business to business.

Countywide Pool Sales Tax
The City continues to receive its share of the County Pool related to the “origin sourcing” portion of sales tax. “Origin sourcing” is a sales tax practice under which sales tax for purchases of goods that are shipped to purchasers are generally sourced to the business location of the retailer where the sale originates.

Under current California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) regulations, a substantial portion of local use tax collections are allocated through a countywide pool to local jurisdictions, like Modesto, where the purchased property is put to its first functional use. Under the pool system, the tax is reported by the taxpayer to the countywide pool of use and then distributed to each jurisdiction in that county on a pro-rata share of taxable sales. If there is a situation where a county of use cannot be determined, then the allocation goes to the state pool for pro-rata distribution on a statewide basis.

The City of Modesto consistently received anywhere between 32% to 38% of the allocation of the countywide pool described above, however this proportionate share has been dropping in recent quarters. With the opening of new stores and distribution centers in areas such as Riverbank, Turlock, and Patterson, the City of Modesto has seen its proportionate share of the Countywide pool drop steadily since the second quarter of 2023. Where once the proportionate share was in the 38% range, the City most recently in the third quarter of 2025 saw this share dip down to 29.7%, though it should be noted that this was an increase of 11.2% from the third quarter of 2024. While #14..
- 290 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
10 | P a g e
this share of sales tax can still represent anywhere between $950 thousand to $1.8 million on a quarterly basis, the City’s share for Q3 2025 was $1.47 million which was higher than the $1.15 million received in Q3 2024.

At this time current year-end projections show sales tax figures that are coming in higher than in the prior fiscal year and higher than what was initially budgeted for the current fiscal year when the budget was adopted. When the initial estimates for the current year were made, they were done conservatively in relation to the current growth trends due to prolonged inflation and a somewhat volatile political landscape at the federal level has affected the local economy much faster than anticipated. Sales Tax will continue to be monitored throughout the year and as changes occur, staff will bring any updates back to City Council as needed. At this time staff are recommending a large increase in Sales Tax revenues based upon current trends.

Staff are recommending an increase of $1,330,262 for this category for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
#14..
- 291 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
11 | P a g e
Sales Tax Charts
Annual Sales Tax Chart
Quarterly Sales Tax Chart
#14..
- 292 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
12 | P a g e
Cannabis Tax Revenue Analysis
Cannabis Tax is beginning to be a normalized source of revenue, and we continue to see some annualized trends in the revenues each fiscal year. When the revenue began to be receipted back in the latter half of fiscal year 2018-19, it started slowly as there was not the full amount of Council approved dispensaries up and running at the time.

Over the next six to eight months the dispensaries began to gain traction and permitted dispensaries became fully operational. Revenues began to increase steadily over the next fiscal year and a half and steadily rose to a consistent $400k+ per month in receipted revenues per month to the City. Since that time, cannabis revenues have dropped to an average of $239K per month in Fiscal Year 2025-26.

As of February 28, 2026, $1.68 million in Cannabis Tax revenue have been received for Fiscal Year 2025-26. This is approximately 49% of the budgeted amount of $3.4 million.

Currently, staff is recommending a decrease of $204 thousand in this revenue category.

The average monthly revenues have decreased by approximately 14.6% from the prior fiscal year and should this trend continue, it would put the fiscal year-end estimate for Cannabis Tax receipts at a total of $3.2 million. The Cannabis Tax revenues that have been receipted this year seem to be steadying but at the same time they are leveling off at a lower average monthly amount than what was seen received last fiscal year.

Staff are recommending a decrease of $204,048 for this category for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Annual Cannabis Tax Revenues
#14..
- 293 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
13 | P a g e
Monthly Cannabis Tax Revenues
The preceding charts show the trends for Cannabis Tax revenues and the growth initially seen and then the declines that have been seen since annually. The chart also shows that through the end of Fiscal Year 2024-25 through the current month of Fiscal Year 2025-26; the revenue trends have steadied for Cannabis Tax at a lower amount.

The monthly cannabis tax revenues area chart shows the monthly revenue for cannabis over a 12-month period from March 2025 through February 2026. It is expected that Fiscal year 2025-26 will continue to see steady revenues though at a lower amount than the prior fiscal year.

Other Tax Revenues
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is a tax collected from guests that occupy or have a right to occupy a living space or establishment for 27 days or less. This tax is most often associated with room rentals at hotels or other like establishments. The current TOT rate in Modesto is 9%. Current trends in this revenue category are showing a somewhat lower rate of receipt than what was shown in the prior fiscal year. Currently the City has received 58% of the budgeted $3.55 million TOT revenue. Year-end projections for this category estimate a slight increase above the budgeted amount of approximately $94 thousand.

Utility Users Tax (UUT) is a usage tax collected on every person that uses electricity, water, gas, or telephone services in the City. This usage tax is collected by the service provider and remitted to the city. The taxes imposed by the UUT are at a rate of 6 percent on all charges made for such services and are capped at a maximum annual amount of $1,500 for any service user for an individual service in any 12-month period. #14..
- 294 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
14 | P a g e
UUT revenues received to date are at 57% of the budgeted amount of $23.6 million. At the same time in the prior fiscal year, 59% of the total budget had been receipted to date, however at a lower budgeted amount of $22.1 million. Current monthly revenues are tracking about an average of 3.1% higher than the previous fiscal year, which is why staff is recommending a conservative increase of approximately $557 thousand. We will continue to monitor this revenue account to see if there are additional gains that will be seen in the next few months that can be realized before fiscal year end.

Business License/Mill Tax is coming in at a much lower amount than the previous fiscal year. To date 48% of the total budgeted revenue of $18.7 million. With Business License/Mill Tax larger total payments are typically received in the months of February and January. January in Fiscal Year 2025-26 had lower amounts received than in the prior fiscal year ($2.5M compared to $2.3M), however, February in Fiscal Year 2025-26 had higher amount received than in the prior fiscal year($1.56M compared to 1.0M) and overall, the revenue received is approximately $507 thousand higher than the prior fiscal year at the same point in time. While revenue is trending slightly higher than the prior Fiscal Year, the budgeted revenue is higher than what is projected to be received by year end. Staff will continue to monitor this revenue source closely as the final amounts are receipted during the remainder of the fiscal year, but at this time recommend a decrease to this category.

Staff are recommending an increase to the Transient Occupancy Tax revenue category in the amount of $94,188, an increase to the Utility Users Tax revenue category in the amount of $557,119 and a decrease to the Business License/Mill Tax revenue category of $1,326,252 for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Other Fee Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fees are currently being receipted at a slightly lower amount than the current budget ($387K receipted as of February 28, 2026, vs $443K budget), however is trending on track to the current Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget. Accordingly, staff are not recommending any change in this category of revenue.

Staff are not recommending any changes to this category currently.

Departmental Revenue Analysis
Departmental revenues are coming in slightly behind than anticipated at this time and it will be an area that will continue to be monitored. The revenues received have a slight lag due to contractual payments and a slight decrease in rentals that are expected to increase in the next few months.
#14..
- 295 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
15 | P a g e
There are no other major areas of concern currently. If anything changes in this category, OPMB - Budget Division will bring an item through the monthly budget adjustment process and update Council on any changes in these categories.

Staff are not recommending any changes to this category currently.

Summary of Recommended Revenue Changes
Category Current Budget
Increase/
(Decrease)
Revised
Amount Account - Description
Sales Tax $35,904,490 $ 1,330,262 $ 37,234,752 41201 - Sales and Use Taxes Utility User Tax $23,619,649 $ 557,119 $ 24,176,768 41203 - Utility Users Tax Transient Occupancy Tax $ 3,546,585 $ 94,188 $ 3,640,773 41204 - Transient Occupancy Tax Business License/Mill Tax $18,690,534 $ (1,326,252) $ 17,364,282 41402 - Business License Tax - Mill Tax Cannabis Tax $ 3,400,793 $ (204,048) $ 3,196,745 41406 - Cannabis Tax Grand Totals $85,162,051 $ 451,269 $ 85,613,320
#14..
- 296 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
16 | P a g e
General Fund Expenditures
(Analysis)
#14..
- 297 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
17 | P a g e
eneral Fund expenditures make up the total budgets from which departments pay for costs related to one of four expenditure categories. These categories include salary and benefit costs, internal service fund costs, discretionary costs, and transfers out to other funds. In the General Fund, there are 13 Operating Departments and one category for Transfers Out of the General Fund to other funds.

The 13 Operating Departments make up a total General Fund operating expenditure budget of $210.1 million with Transfers Out having a budget of $5.52 million. Including the variance rate of a credit of $13.8 million, the total current General Fund operating expenditure budget in Fiscal Year 2025-26 is $202.7 million.

The table below shows the current budget and expenditures through February 28, 2026.

General Fund Department Expenditures
At the point in time that the expenditure data was collected, one could expect an estimated expenditure rate of approximately 67% (8 months elapsed out of the fiscal year). The chart shows that the overall General Fund expenditures are slightly above this target with 68% of the total budget expended. We are seeing salary savings in some of the departments due to vacant positions which are resulting in some of the decreased level of expenditure. The slightly higher rate of expenditure of 68% is due to the payment that is made in July for the full year of CalPERs unfunded liability. This payment made at the beginning of the fiscal year will show the spend down percentage Department Current Budget
Actuals (as of
Feb 28, 2026)
% of Budget
Expended
Police Department $ (89,747,857) $ (56,669,440) 63%
Fire Department $ (56,102,566) $ (38,557,200) 69%
Oakdale Fire Contract Expense $ (7,013,021) $ (5,020,370) 72% Ceres Fire Contract Expense $ (8,040,529) $ (5,857,165) 73% Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Contract Expense $ (413,871) $ (224,884) 54% Turlock Fire Contract Expense $ (353,777) $ (244,674) 69% Salida Fire Contract Expense $ (2,308,700) $ (1,560,161) 68% Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhoods $ (16,273,159) $ (10,687,798) 66% Community and Economic Development $ (7,653,603) $ (4,784,168) 63% Engineering Services Department $ (3,045,847) $ (1,878,883) 62% City Council $ (799,128) $ (434,086) 54%
City Manager's Office $ (3,106,676) $ (2,031,826) 65%
Human Resources $ (2,234,656) $ (1,493,429) 67%
City Attorney's Office $ (2,044,503) $ (1,198,708) 59%
City Clerk's Office $ (834,877) $ (558,674) 67%
Office of Performance Management & Budget $ (1,290,074) $ (704,888) 55% Office of the City Auditor $ (603,761) $ (130,175) 22%
Finance Department $ (7,799,276) $ (5,005,223) 64%
Non-Departmental $ (435,500) $ (60,695) 14%
Total Departmental Expenses $ (210,101,381) $ (137,102,447) 65% Transfers Out $ (6,515,077) $ (300,245) 5%
Variance Rate (5%) $ 13,868,142 $ - 0%
Total Department Expenses $ (202,748,316) $ (137,402,692) 68% G
#14..
- 298 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
18 | P a g e
slightly higher as the payment is for the full fiscal year and made at the beginning of the year. There are also increases in other areas that are bringing up overall expenses such as the increased cost of goods, and the increased costs of contract services. #14..
- 299 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
19 | P a g e
Below is a table that shows the breakdown of the expenditures from each department by appropriation unit category. As reminder the breakdown of expenditure categories is as follows:
• Appr Unit A – Salaries and Benefits
• Appr Unit AA – Intrafund Labor
• Appr Unit B – Internal Service Fund Charges
• Appr Unit C – Discretionary Charges
• Appr Unit D – Transfers Out
Department
Current
Budget
Actuals (as of
Feb 28, 2026)
Amount
Available
%
Expended
City Attorney's Office
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 717,040 $ 444,849 $ 272,191 62% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 217,352 $ 140,926 $ 76,426 65% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 1,110,111 $ 619,355 $ 476,697 56% City Attorney's Office Total $ 2,044,503 $ 1,205,130 $ 839,372 59% City Clerk's Office $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 540,988 $ 370,869 $ 170,119 69% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 100,523 $ 66,169 $ 34,354 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 193,366 $ 115,213 $ 76,255 60% City Clerk's Office Total $ 834,877 $ 552,252 $ 282,625 66% City Council $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 557,323 $ 325,529 $ 231,794 58% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 115,202 $ 75,004 $ 40,198 65% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 126,603 $ 33,554 $ 79,702 27% City Council Total $ 799,128 $ 434,086 $ 365,041 54%
City Manager's Office $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 2,244,443 $ 1,473,634 $ 770,809 66% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 257,347 $ 168,848 $ 88,499 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 604,886 $ 389,344 $ 220,235 64% City Manager's Office Total $ 3,106,676 $ 2,031,826 $ 1,074,850 65% Community & Economic Development $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 5,325,092 $ 3,337,694 $ 1,987,398 63% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ (39,836) $ (9,608) $ (30,229) 24% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 1,286,669 $ 846,716 $ 439,953 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 1,081,678 $ 609,365 $ 469,016 56% Community & Economic Development Total $ 7,653,603 $ 4,784,168 $ 2,869,436 63% Engineering Department
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 2,539,025 $ 1,677,573 $ 861,452 66% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ (97,851) $ (47,350) $ (50,501) 48% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 180,882 $ 119,796 $ 61,086 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 423,791 $ 128,864 $ 294,519 30% Engineering Department Total $ 3,045,847 $ 1,878,883 $ 1,166,964 62% Finance Department
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 5,237,967 $ 3,341,212 $ 1,896,755 64% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ (73,058) $ (49,297) $ (23,761) 67% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 901,542 $ 593,810 $ 307,732 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 1,732,825 $ 1,119,497 $ 687,765 65% Finance Department Total $ 7,799,276 $ 5,005,223 $ 2,794,053 64% Fire Department
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 52,457,888 $ 35,617,792 $ 16,840,096 68% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 1,938,724 $ 1,292,483 $ 646,241 67% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 6,507,483 $ 4,056,189 $ 2,713,802 62% Fire Department Total $ 60,904,095 $ 40,966,464 $ 19,937,630 67% #14..
- 300 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
20 | P a g e
The main takeaway from the information above is that unlike in past years there are not a large amount of savings in the Salaries and Benefits expenditures for departments like Department
Current
Budget
Actuals (as of
Feb 28, 2026)
Amount
Available
%
Expended
Fire Department - Ceres
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 6,034,438 $ 5,320,176 $ 714,262 88% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 144,909 $ 96,606 $ 48,303 67% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 228,532 $ 200,379 $ 29,562 88% Fire Department - Ceres Total $ 6,407,879 $ 5,617,161 $ 790,718 88% Fire Department - Oakdale $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 6,369,214 $ 4,505,832 $ 1,863,382 71% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 145,777 $ 97,185 $ 48,592 67% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 405,500 $ 277,813 $ 108,057 69% Fire Department - Oakdale Total $ 6,920,491 $ 4,880,829 $ 2,039,662 71% Human Resources $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 2,018,606 $ 1,361,132 $ 657,474 67% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ (170,365) $ (113,577) $ (56,788) 67% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 336,865 $ 221,042 $ 115,823 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 49,550 $ 24,832 $ 24,793 50% Human Resources Total $ 2,234,656 $ 1,493,429 $ 741,227 67% Non-Departmental $ -
Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 435,500 $ 60,695 $ 371,497 14% Non-Departmental Total $ 435,500 $ 60,695 $ 374,805 14% Office of the City Auditor $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 317,271 $ 60,100 $ 257,171 19% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 16,440 $ 10,624 $ 5,816 65% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 270,050 $ 59,450 $ 163,106 22% Office of the City Auditor Total $ 603,761 $ 130,175 $ 473,586 22% Office of Performance Management & Budget $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 1,036,805 $ 640,663 $ 396,142 62% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 85,259 $ 56,285 $ 28,974 66% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 168,010 $ 7,941 $ 160,069 5% Office of Performance Management & Budget Total $ 1,290,074 $ 704,888 $ 585,186 55% Parks, Recreation & Neighborhoods $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 7,812,609 $ 5,314,434 $ 2,498,175 68% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ (658,613) $ (580,466) $ (78,147) 88% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 2,054,849 $ 1,367,020 $ 687,829 67% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 7,064,314 $ 4,586,811 $ 2,324,235 65% Parks, Recreation & Neighborhoods Total $ 16,273,159 $ 10,687,798 $ 5,585,361 66% Police Department $ -
Salaries and Benefits (Appr Unit A) $ 68,014,500 $ 43,989,505 $ 24,024,995 65% Intrafund Labor (Appr Unit AA) $ - $ (236,483) $ 236,483 0% ISF Charges (Appr Unit B) $ 6,618,382 $ 4,416,583 $ 2,201,799 67% Discretionary Charges (Appr Unit C) $ 15,114,975 $ 8,499,835 $ 4,798,789 56% Police Department Total $ 89,747,857 $ 56,669,440 $ 33,078,417 63% Transfers Out $ -
Transfers Out $ 6,515,077 $ 300,245 $ 6,214,832 5%
Transfers Out Total $ 6,515,077 $ 300,245 $ 6,214,832 5% Variance Rate $ -
Variance Rate $ (13,868,142) $ - $(13,868,142) 0%
Variance Rate Total $ (13,868,142) $ - $(13,868,142) 0% Grand Total $202,748,316 $137,402,692 $ 65,345,624 68%
#14..
- 301 -
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year General Fund Update
21 | P a g e
Parks, Recreation and Neighborhoods, Police, and Community and Economic Development. These departments still see some savings in this category, but they are experiencing much lower rates of vacancy in totality throughout the fiscal year.

The other issue that is starting to be seen across the organization is the impact of the prolonged inflation on costs of goods and services. Parts are much more expensive to procure, and services see price increases throughout the life of contracts and all these things contribute to increased expenses in the Discretionary category.

One area that has the potential to impact fiscal year-end is the subsidies that are provided through transfer outs to the Centre Plaza and the Parking Fund. The Centre Plaza subsidy was budgeted for one half of the year through December 31, 2025. The final transfer amount will be determined as part of the transfers that are completed at fiscal year-end. The Parking Fund has continued to experience loss in revenue. The actual year-end transfer amount will depend on actual revenue and expenditure at fiscal year-end. This will be closely monitored by staff as we continue through the current fiscal year.

The revenues and expenditures will continue to be monitored for each of these funds in the next few months for potential impacts on the General Fund and will be reported back to Council if necessary.

Expenditure Conclusions
Overall expenditures are trending slightly above what would be expected at this time in the fiscal year. This is being driven mainly by the CalPERS unfunded liability payment that is made at the beginning of the fiscal year. Discretionary spending will continue to be monitored as well as the possibility of increasing subsidy needs from the Centre Plaza and Parking Funds.

Staff are recommending no change to department expenditure budgets for Fiscal Year 2025-26 currently.
#14..
- 302 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
Date: March 18, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Stephan Christensen, Office of Performance Management and Budget Director
SUBJECT: Monthly Budget Adjustment Report – March 2026
CONTACT: Kaceey Culbertson, Budget Manager, [email protected], 209-571-5855
DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving the recommended budget adjustments to Fiscal Year 2025- 26 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets. (Funding Source: Various Funds)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

This item supports the City of Modesto 2025-2026 Strategic Plan focus on Governance and Service Delivery under Goal H: Achieve Long-Term Financial Sustainability.

BACKGROUND:

Each month, City staff presents a variety of budget adjustments requiring the approval of the City Council. These changes are submitted to the Finance Committee for review prior to submission to Council and include an explanation and justification for each transaction.

This report includes a number of adjustments that have been identified by monitoring department budgets. Due to the number of adjustments, they have been included as an attachment to this report (Exhibit A). As in past reports, adjustments are separated by fund and department as appropriate. The adjustments are reflected in a more summarized version and supporting documentation is available for review upon request. #15..
- 303 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Monthly Budget Adjustment Report – March 2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

Also included in this report as an attachment (Exhibit B) is a summary of the budget adjustments approved by the City Manager and/or the Office of Performance Management and Budget Director consistent with the authority levels that were approved by Council with the passing of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget via Resolution No. 2025-187.

DISCUSSION:

The monthly budget adjustments attached as Exhibit A in this item include adjustments across various departments. These adjustments are explained in further detail within Exhibit A.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of each item is noted in the attachments to this report. The adjustments are for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

This item does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 and requires no environmental review.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Finance Committee on March 23, 2026, and the Committee recommended forwarding the item to Council for approval.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution amending Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Project Fund Budgets and authorizing the City Manager, to take the necessary steps to implement the provisions of this Resolution.

Approved by:

Stephan Christensen, Office of Performance
Management and Budget Director
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A – Budget Adjustments Requiring Council Approval

3. Exhibit B - Staff Approved Budget Adjustments
#15..
- 304 -
04/07/2026/OPMB/SChristensen/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL

OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BUDGETS AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, TO TAKE THE NECESSARY

STEPS TO IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, a financial analysis has been completed and it has been determined that a budget adjustment is required to the Annual and Capital Improvement Budgets of the City of Modesto for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating and Capital Improvement budget as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to take the necessary steps to implement the provisions of this resolution.
#15..
- 305 -
04/07/2026/OPMB/SChristensen/Item X 2 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April 2026, by Councilmember _________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ______, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following votes:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#15..
- 306 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Monthly Budget Adjustment Report

EXHIBIT A
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• A budget adjustment is necessary to allocate funds to various Measure L projects. The total amount of the adjustment is $1,510,000. Each project will have an increase in the transfer out from Fund 1410 – Measure L Local Road Tax to the project and an increase to the projects discretionary expense accounts. This was approved by the Citizen’s Transportation Sales Tax Commission at the meeting held on March 5, 2026. Below is the adjustment to each project.

Project
Number
Project Name Amount for
Adjustment
Local Streets and Roads Category
101314 Coffee Rd. Pavement Rehab Ph. II $1,400,000
Traffic Management Category
101721
101361
Upgrade Traffic Signals 2025
Install RRFB at 3 Locations
$10,000
$150,000
Bike and Pedestrian Category
New Project Downtown Quiet Zone $100,000
Total Increase to Projects $1,660,000
Total Transfer Out from Fund 1410 $1,660,000

HUMAN RESOURCES
• A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $1,099,174 to establish the transfer out from Fund 5510 – Employee Benefits Fund to Fund 0100 – General Fund. The transfer is being established for the payroll expenses that account for the Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) shift payment as part of the Modesto City Fire Fighters Association (MCFFA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU language includes a contribution from the employees for the annual UAL payment which is paid from the General Fund.

PARKS, RECREATION AND NEIGHBORHOODS-MEASURE H
• A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $85,000 to increase the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Measure H Spending Plan for the necessary maintenance at John Thurman Field. The adjustment will increase the total allocation from $0 to $85,000 to account for upgrades in Field Lighting and Netting in anticipation for the Modesto Roadsters Baseball season Project 101727 - Measure H - JTF Improvements has been created for the expenditures and revenue. #15..
- 307 -
City Council April 7, 2026
Monthly Budget Adjustment Report

Page 2 of 2 ends

POLICE DEPARTMENT
• A budget adjustment in an amount not to exceed $350,000 is necessary to increase Discretionary Expenses in the Traffic Safety Fund (1600). The fund is currently over budget due to higher-than-expected repair and equipment needs.

The increase in budget will be coming from the Fund Reserves where there is sufficient fund balance.

PUBLIC WORKS
• A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $100,000 to increase the Appropriation Unit C in Cost Center 55312 - Airport Services, Fund 4310 - Airport Operating Fund (4310) related to an emergency purchase of an Airport Tractor.

As part of the adjustment, the transfer from County Aircraft Tax Fund (4330) to the Airport Operating Fund (4310) will be established as well to cover the increased costs.

UTILITIES
• A budget adjustment in the amount of $175,000 is needed in the Sewer Operations Fund (4210) for Project 101625 – North Trunk Phase 2 to increase the project’s discretionary expense budget to cover Design Phase expenses through the Award of Construction. The project budget was previously adjusted in the amount of $50,000 by the City Manager’s authority. This budget adjustment will increase the total project budget to $225,000. #15..
- 308 -
Department Director/Director of Office Performance and Budget (OPMB)/City Manager Approved Budget Adjustments EXHIBIT B For FY2025/26
AT #
Approved
by CM,
Director
OPMB or
DD
Fund Fund Name Cost Ctr/Project Name Account Name Rev/Exp/TI/TO Account
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease)
Revised
Budget Description
AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Accounting Salaries and Wages - Part-time Exp $ 24,000 $ (4,000) $ 20,000 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Licensing Postage Expense Exp $ 53,900 $ (4,000) $ 49,900 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Administration Office Supplies Exp $ 1,440 $ (500) $ 940 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Administration Conference Expenses Exp $ 3,181 $ (500) $ 2,681 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Citation Processing Services Conference Expenses Exp $ 4,500 $ 500 $ 5,000 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Citation Processing Services Training Expenses Exp $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 1,500 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Purchasing Training Expenses Exp $ 2,146 $ 2,000 $ 4,146 AT-067 DD 0100 General Fund FIN-Purchasing Salaries and Wages - Part-time Exp $ 15,000 $ 6,000 $ 21,000 AT-086 OPMB 0100 General Fund 06010 - City Auditor Budget Only - Salary Adjustment - Decrease Exp $ (179,295) $ (20,050) $ (199,345) AT-086 OPMB 0100 General Fund 06010 - City Auditor Professional Services Exp $ 250,000 $ 20,050 $ 270,050 Total Changes for Fund 0100 $ 175,872 $ - $ 175,872
AT-072 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101574 - 2023-2024 BJAG Appr Unit C EXP $ 144,951 $ (4,349) $ 140,602 AT-072 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101574 - 2023-2024 BJAG 42020 - Federal DOJ Rev $ 144,951 $ (4,349) $ 140,602 AT-081 DD 1342 Grants - Police 101483 - 2023 BSCC Officer Wellness 42199 - Intergov - State - Miscellaneous Grants Rev $ 127,779 $ 1 $ 127,780
AT-081 DD 1342 Grants - Police 101483 - 2023 BSCC Officer Wellness AUC - Tools & Field Supplies<$5,000 EXP $ 127,779 $ 1 $ 127,780 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101059 - 17/18 SLESF 48010 - Interest Rev $ 47,893 $ 140 $ 48,033 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101059 - 17/18 SLESF Appr Unit C Rev $ 284,440 $ 140 $ 284,580 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101284 - 20/21 SLESF 48010 - Interest Rev $ 33,472 $ 370 $ 33,842 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101284 - 20/21 SLESF Appr Unit C Rev $ 512,905 $ 370 $ 513,275 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101424 - 22/23 SLESF 48010 - Interest Rev $ 43,286 $ 508 $ 43,794 AT-092 OPMB 1342 Police Grants Fund 101424 - 22/23 SLESF Appr Unit C Rev $ 676,195 $ 508 $ 676,703 Total Changes for Fund 1342 $ 2,143,651 $ (6,660) $ 2,136,991 AT-077 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101575 - Travelers Motel 48010 - Interest Revenue on Bank Accounts Rev $ 134,626 $ 68,336 $ 202,962 AT-077 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101575 - Travelers Motel 54500 - Services City Forces - Interfund EXP $ 134,626 $ 68,336 $ 202,962 AT-078 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101682 - HopeWorks 48010 - Interest Revenue on Bank Accounts Rev $ 44,150 $ 11,960 $ 56,110 AT-078 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101682 - HopeWorks 54500 - Services City Forces - Interfund EXP $ 44,150 $ 11,960 $ 56,110 AT-079 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101663 - ERF 48010 - Interest Revenue on Bank Accounts Rev $ - $ 21,189 $ 21,189 AT-079 OPMB 1346 CED Grants Reimbursed 101663 - ERF 54500 - Services City Forces - Interfund EXP $ - $ 21,189 $ 21,189 Total Changes for Fund 1346 $ 357,552 $ 202,970 $ 560,522 AT-091 OPMB 1390 ARPA FUND 101428 - Graceada Park Fence CA - Construction Admin Exp $ 15,272 $ 3,457 $ 18,729 AT-091 OPMB 1390 ARPA FUND 101428 - Graceada Park Fence CTGY - Contingency Exp $ 30,544 $ (3,457) $ 27,087 Total Changes for Fund 1390 $ 45,816 $ - $ 45,816
AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 52010 - Office Supplies EXP $ 2,500 $ (800) $ 1,700 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 52030 - Books and Periodicals EXP $ 2,038 $ (600) $ 1,438 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 53020 - Conference Expenses EXP $ 4,000 $ (3,000) $ 1,000 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 53025 - Training Expenses EXP $ 8,000 $ (4,500) $ 3,500 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 53030 - Business Expenses EXP $ 2,554 $ (1,000) $ 1,554 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 53100 - Repair and Maintenance Services EXP $ 6,000 $ (3,200) $ 2,800 AT-080 DD 1700 Surface Transportation Fund 53510 - Traffic Engineering 51040 - Salaries and Wages - Part-time EXP $ 70,000 $ 13,100 $ 83,100 Total Changes for Fund 1700 $ 95,092 $ - $ 95,092
AT-076 OPMB 1850 Disability Access Education Fund CED - Disability Access and Education Services City Forces - Interfund Exp $ 2,634 $ 5,000 $ 7,634 A budget adjustment of $5,000 is necessary to increase expense budget for Services City Forces - Interfund for staff time used for training. Fund reserves will be used for the increase in expense budget.

Total Changes for Fund 1850 $ 2,634 $ 5,000 $ 7,634
AT-085 OPMB 3122 Measure H - Non-Capital Projects 101605 - Def. Maintenance- Reallocate to Meas H AUC-MCP Pump - Professional Services Exp $ 50,000 $ (50,000) $ - AT-085 OPMB 3122 Measure H - Non-Capital Projects 101605 - Def. Maintenance- Reallocate to Meas H AUC-Mary Grogan - Professional Services Exp $ 10,000 $ (10,000) $ - AT-085 OPMB 3122 Measure H - Non-Capital Projects 101605 - Def. Maintenance- Reallocate to Meas H AUC-Davis Ballfield Lighting - Professional Services Exp $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Total Changes for Fund 3122 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000
AT-087 OPMB 3160 Capital Grants - Streets CIP 101721 - Upgrade Traffic Signals 2025 42110 - Intergov State CA Dept of Trans Rev $ - $ 19,400 $ 19,400 AT-087 OPMB 3160 Capital Grants - Streets CIP 101721 - Upgrade Traffic Signals 2025 Appr Unit C Exp $ - $ 19,400 $ 19,400 Total Changes for Fund 3160 $ - $ 38,800 $ 38,800
A budget adjustment of $19,000 is necessary in various General Fund Finance cost centers to correct the breakdown in reductions for FY25-26. There is no change to the overall General Fund Finance budget.

A budget adjustment in the amount of -$4,349 is needed to correct the accounting structure to recognize Grant revenue received and to program offsetting expenses in a A budget adjustment is necessary to increase the budget for the project due to interest revenue received. This interest revenue is directly allocated to the project because the grant is paid upfront (not on a reimbursement basis). As a result, the cash sitting in our bank account is included in an investment pool that earns interest A budget adjustment is necessary to increase the budget for the project due to interest revenue received. This interest revenue is directly allocated to the project because the grant is paid upfront (not on a reimbursement basis). As a result, the cash sitting in our bank account is included in an investment pool that earns interest.

A budget adjustment is necessary to increase the budget for the project due to interest revenue received. This interest revenue is directly allocated to the project because the grant is paid upfront (not on a reimbursement basis). As a result, the cash sitting in our bank account is included in an investment pool that earns interest.

A budget adjustment is necessary to allow for additional P/T paid intern staffing in the PW. Traffic Engineering division for FY25-26. Reduction in various Appr C accounts to increase Salaries and Wages - Part-time by $13,100 in cost center 53510.

A budget adjustment is needed to cover an overage of $0.04 in project 101483 - 2023 BSCC Officer Wellness.

A budget adjustment of $60,000 is needed in project 101605 to decrease nonactive tasks and establish the budget for Davis Ballfield Lighting task.

A budget adjustment is needed in the amount of $20,050 from Salaries to Discretionary to pay for the 2025 Evaluation of the contracted City Auditor. There are sufficient salary savings to move from Appr A to C. The overall City Auditor budget is not changing.

A budget adjustment is necessary for project 101428 to reallocate expense funding of $3,457 from Contingency to cover the overage on Construction Admin and balance the project. No additional funds are being added.

A budget adjustment in the amount of $1,018 is needed to recognize SLESF revenue received from interest earned to program offsetting expenses in a like amount in multiple SLESF projects, 101059, 101284,101424
A budget adjustment is necessary to establish the budget for Project 101721 - Upgrade Traffic Signals 2025. This project was recently awarded a CalTrans grant in the amount of $19,400 for design work on the project. There is no match funding required for this grant.
#15..
- 309 -
Department Director/Director of Office Performance and Budget (OPMB)/City Manager Approved Budget Adjustments EXHIBIT B For FY2025/26
AT #
Approved
by CM,
Director
OPMB or
DD
Fund Fund Name Cost Ctr/Project Name Account Name Rev/Exp/TI/TO Account
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease)
Revised
Budget Description
AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Services City Forces - Interfund Exp $ 15,182 $ (7,650) $ 7,532 AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Postage Expense Exp $ - $ 50 $ 50
AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Electricity Utility Expenses Exp $ - $ 100 $ 100 AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Water Utility Expenses Exp $ - $ 500 $ 500 AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A...

Repair and Maintenance Services -
Landscape Exp $ - $ 750 $ 750
AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Professional Services Exp $ - $ 500 $ 500 AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Legal Services Exp $ - $ 250 $ 250
AT-089 OPMB 3218 Kiernan Business Park South #2
CFD Fund
CED - Kiernan Business Park South #2 CFD Annexation,
Formation, and A... Services City Forces - Interfund Exp $ - $ 5,500 $ 5,500 Total Changes for Fund 3218 $ 15,182 $ - $ 15,182
AT-084 OPMB 3246 Fairview Village #2 CED - Fairview Village #2 Annexation, Formation and Annual Maintenance Professional Services Exp $ - $ 3,750 $ 3,750 AT-084 OPMB 3246 Fairview Village #2 CED - Fairview Village #2 Annexation, Formation and Annual Maintenance Legal Services Exp $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000
AT-084 OPMB 3246 Fairview Village #2 CED - Fairview Village #2 Annexation, Formation and Annual Maintenance Services City Forces - Interfund Exp $ - $ 3,750 $ 3,750 Total Changes for Fund 3246 $ - $ 9,500 $ 9,500
AT-082 CM 4100 Water Fund 101723 - NE Corp Yard Facility Maintenance. AUC - Professional Services EXP $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $50,000 to establish the initial budget for project 101723. This project is for maintenance and repairs to the NE Corp Yard at Litt Road.

Total Changes for Fund 4100 $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000
AT-073 OPMB 4140 Water Fund Grants 101715 - Modesto GW Improvements AUC-EDA EXP $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 A budget adjustment is necessary to establish an initial project budget of $25,000.

Total Changes for Fund 4140 $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000
AT-068 CM 4180 Water Fund - CIP Projects 101718 - Blending Ops Plan Amendment AUC-EDA EXP $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 A budget adjustment of $50,000 is necessary to fund the initial project expense budget for 101718 - Citywide Blending Operations Plan Amendment.

Total Changes for Fund 4180 $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000
AT-066 OPMB 4210 Sewer Fund 101494 - Sewer Trunk Rehabilitation AUC - EDA Exp $ 2,320,180 $ (25,000) $ 2,295,180 AT-066 OPMB 4210 Sewer Fund 101494 - Sewer Trunk Rehabilitation AUC - CFF Exp $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Total Changes for Fund 4210 $ 2,320,180 $ - $ 2,320,180 AT-083 CM 4212 Wastewater PCE Mitigation Fund 100668 - WW PCE Mitigation Site 1 AUC - Professional Services EXP $ 2,260,022 $ 70,702 $ 2,330,724 A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $70,702 in project 100668 to increase the expense budget to cover a proposal to replace a monitoring well approved by the City Attorney's Office.

Total Changes for Fund 4212 $ 2,260,022 $ 70,702 $ 2,330,724 AT-071 OPMB 6710 JPA - TRRP Special Revenue
Fund 101478 - TRRP B Improvements AUC-CON EXP $ 296,983 $ 18,070 $ 315,053 AT-071 OPMB 6710 JPA - TRRP Special Revenue
Fund 101478 - TRRP B Improvements AUC-CA EXP $ 34,120 $ 4,626 $ 38,746 AT-071 OPMB 6710 JPA - TRRP Special Revenue
Fund 101478 - TRRP B Improvements Appr Unit C EXP $ 132,937 $ 2,304 $ 135,241 AT-090 OPMB 6710 TRRP CIP 101061 - Carpenter Road Soccer CTGY-CIP Exp $ 127,042 $ (10,000) $ 117,042 AT-090 OPMB 6710 TRRP CIP 101061 - Carpenter Road Soccer CON Exp $ 1,409,263 $ 10,000 $ 1,419,263 Total Changes for Fund 6710 $ 2,000,345 $ 25,000 $ 2,025,345 A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $25,000 to process change order 1 for the purchase of the restroom for TRRP Area B. Increase in budget appropriations will be covered by $350,000 in fund balance which is going to Council for approval on Feb. 10, 2026.

A budget adjustment in the amount of $25,000 is necessary to add and increase an AUC - CFF Task line.

A budget adjustment of $9,500 is necessary to recognize developer deposits received and establish budget for Tivoli Annexation #2 in fiscal year 2025-26.

A budget adjustment of $7,650 is necessary to establish full FY25-26 Budget based on revenues received from CFD levy assessment and distributing the discretionary budget to the appropriate accounts for the annual maintenance costs.

A budget adjustment is necessary to reallocate CTGY-CIP Budget to increase the CON Task line to alleviate a Purchasing Module Funds Check on the CON Task line related to the final contractor payment.
#15..
- 310 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2029
Date: March 16, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Hill, Director of Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Adoption of the 2025 California Building Codes CONTACT: Oscar Diaz, Chief Building Official,
[email protected], 209-571-5885
DESCRIPTION:

Consider repealing and replacing Chapters 1, 2, 3, 7, and 11 of Title 9 of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference, the 2025 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical, and Existing Building Codes. (Funding Source: General Fund, Building Permit Fees)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

These mandatory state codes are in line with the 205-2026 City of Modesto’s Strategic Plan Commitment Great Safe Neighborhoods, “Provide a safe and inviting community in which to live, work, and visit.”
BACKGROUND:

The International Code Council develops the model codes on a three-year code cycle.

The codes are known as “The International Building Codes”. The California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) is the responsible State body for all building code development. Every three (3) years, the CBSC conducts code development hearings to gain input from developers, building officials, local and state government leaders and other interested parties to review the Building Code Standards for the State of California.

These standards contain the minimum building requirements for the State of California and are mandatory throughout the State. This ordinance updates the City Building Codes to align with the new 2025 California Codes.
#16..
- 311 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Adoption of the 2025 California Building Codes

Page 2 of 3 ends

DISCUSSION:

Title 9 of the City of Modesto Municipal Code contains the City of Modesto’s building codes. These codes are primarily adopted by reference to the adopted State standards.

The California Building Standards Code (Building Code) is published by the California Building Standards Commission and filed with the Secretary of State, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18938. Every three years, the Commission amends the Building Code and cities and counties are obligated to adopt the new standards. The most recently adopted version of the Building Code became effective January 1, 2026, and included the following:
• California Building Code
• California Mechanical Code
• California Electrical Code
• California Plumbing Code
• California Residential Code
• California Wildland-Urban Interface code
• California Green Building Standard Code
Assembly Bill 130, which was signed into law on June 30, 2025, prohibits any local amendments to codes affecting residential buildings until 2031 and allows development to continue under currently approved “master plans” for ten years.

Notable changes in the 2025 codes include:
• Sleeping lofts for single family dwellings.
o Sleeping lofts were previously only allowed in tiny homes. • More detailed requirements for the construction of decks and balconies. • Smoke alarms required in stacked non-sprinklered dwellings will require smoke alarms that provide an alert in the adjacent unit.
• Electrical Requirements
o Kitchen receptacles all need to be GFCI protected even when not mounted on the counter.
o All food preparation areas outside of the kitchen need GFCI protection o Drinking water coolers and bottle fillers will need to be GFCI protected. o Hotels will need to have surge protection devices to protect guest’s electronics.

Although each new edition contains minor technical changes, modifications and clarifications, these changes can be incorporated in the design of the projects and will have a minimal to moderate impact on constructability.

A required public hearing is scheduled for May 12, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The implementation of this Code requires additional training for existing staff. Funding is budgeted in the FY 25/26 Building Safety Division budget. We do not anticipate any other funding requirements to implement this Code.
#16..
- 312 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Adoption of the 2025 California Building Codes

Page 3 of 3 ends

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Safety and Communities Committee on March 9, 2026, who recommended its approval.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

This item does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 and requires no environmental review.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Motion introducing and waiving the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 1 ”Building Code” of Title 9, “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 California Building Code.

Motion introducing and waiving the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 2 “Plumbing Code” of Title 9 “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 California Plumbing Code.

Motion introducing and waiving the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 3 “Electrical Code” of Title 9 “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 California Electrical Code.

Motion introducing and waiving the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 7 “Mechanical Code” of Title 9 “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 California Mechanical Code.

Motion introducing and waiving the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 11 “Existing Building Code” of Title 9 “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code to adopt by reference the 2025 California Existing Building Code.

Approved by:

Jessica Hill
Director of Community & Economic
Development
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Proposed Building Code Ordinance

2. Proposed Plumbing Code Ordinance

3. Proposed Electrical Code Ordinance

4. Proposed Mechanical Code Ordinance

5. Proposed Existing Building Code Ordinance
#16..
- 313 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
ORDINANCE NO. xxxx-C.S.

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 1, “BUILDING CODE,” OF TITLE 9, “BUILDING REGULATIONS” OF THE MODESTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA

BUILIDNG CODE
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 18938 makes provisions published in the California Building Standards Code pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922 applicable to all occupancies throughout the State and effective one hundred and eighty days after publication by the California Building Standards Commission (the Commission), or at a later date established by the Commission; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits cities in adopting provisions of the California Building Standards Code to make such changes in such provisions as the city determines, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that a city, before making changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5, must make an express finding that such changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, under Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 may not become effective until the required findings, and the changes, have been filed with the California Building Standards Commission; and
#16..
- 314 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
WHEREAS, the City is not proposing any amendments to the California Building Code; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 50022.2 permits enactment of City Ordinances that adopt codes or statutes, including codes of the State of California, by reference; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and that such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Modesto does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CODE.

Chapter 1, “Building Code” of Title 9, “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following.

Chapter 1. BUILDING CODE
Article 1. Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Building Code 9-1.101 Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Building Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the 2022 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 1 and 2, as published by the International Code Council, as now existing, or hereafter amended, regulating and governing the conditions of all properties, buildings, and structures; by providing the standards for facilities and other physical things and conditions essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupancy and use; and the condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human occupancy and use and the demotion of such structures; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; and providing penalties for the violation thereof; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said 2025 California Building #16..
- 315 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
Code on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, deletions, insertions and changes, if any, prescribed in this Chapter, be and hereby is adopted as the Building Code of the City of Modesto. 9-1.101.2 Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Residential Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the Chief Building Official at the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the California Residential Code, 2025 edition, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2.5 as published by the International Code Council, regulating and governing the conditions of residential detached one- and two-family dwellings by providing the standards for facilities and other physical things and conditions essential to ensure that these structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupation and use; and the demolition of such structures as herein provided, providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; and providing penalties for the violation thereof, and each and all of the regulations; provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said building code on file in the office of the Chief Building Official of Modesto are hereby referred to, adopted and made part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance with the additions, deletions and changes, if any prescribed in this chapter, be and hereby are adopted by reference as the Building Code of the City of Modesto.
9-1.101.3 Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of Chief Building Official at the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the California Green Building Standards Code, 2025 edition, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11 as published by the International Code Council, regulating and governing the conditions for energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, material conservation and resource efficiency for residential and nonresidential buildings hereby referred to, adopted and made part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance with the additions, deletions and changes, if any prescribed in this chapter, be and hereby is adopted by reference as the Green Building Code of the City of Modesto.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the #16..
- 316 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The proposed Ordinance is exempt from CEQA under the general rule in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 5. PUBLICATION
At least two (2) days prior to its final adoption, copies of this Ordinance shall be posted in at least three (3) prominent and distinct locations in the City; and a notice shall be published once in The Modesto Bee, the official newspaper of the City of Modesto, setting forth the title of this ordinance, the date of its introduction and the places where this Ordinance is posted.
#16..
- 317 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the _____ day of _____, 2026, by Councilmember , who moved its introduction and passage to print, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and ordered printed and published by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#16..
- 318 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026

FINAL ADOPTION CLAUSE
The foregoing ordinance, having been published as required by the Charter of the City of Modesto, and coming on for final consideration at the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, Councilmember moved its final adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and the ordinance adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
#16..
- 319 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025
ORDINANCE NO. xxxx-C.S.

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 2, “PLUMBING CODE” OF TITLE 9, “BUILDING REGULATIONS” OF THE MODESTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 18938 makes provisions published in the California Building Standards Code pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922 applicable to all occupancies throughout the State and effective one hundred and eighty days after publication by the California Building Standards Commission (the Commission), or at a later date established by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits cities in adopting provisions of the California Building Standards Code to make such changes in such provisions as the city determines, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that a city, before making changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5, must make an express finding that such changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, under Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 may not become effective until the required findings, and the changes, have been filed with the California Building Standards Commission; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 50022.2 permits enactment of City Ordinances that adopt codes or statutes, including codes of the State of California, by reference; and #16..
- 320 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025
WHEREAS, the City is not proposing any amendments to the California Plumbing Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and that such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Modesto does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CODE.

Chapter 2, “Plumbing Code” of Title 9, “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following.

Chapter 2 PLUMBING CODE
Article 1. Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Plumbing Code 9-2.101 Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Plumbing Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the 2025 California Plumbing Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, as published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), as now existing, or hereafter amended, regulating and governing the erection, alteration, installation, repair, relocation, replacement, addition to, use or maintenance of plumbing and drainage systems and parts thereof for the protection of public health and safety, providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees, providing penalties for the violation thereof; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said 2025 California Plumbing Code on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, deletions, insertions and changes, if any, prescribed in this Chapter, be and hereby is adopted as the Plumbing Code of the City of Modesto.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY
#16..
- 321 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025
If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

The proposed Ordinance is exempt from CEQA under the general rule in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

Effective:___________, 2025

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#16..
- 323 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025

FINAL ADOPTION CLAUSE
The foregoing ordinance, having been published as required by the Charter of the City of Modesto, and coming on for final consideration at the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the ____ day of _________, 2026, Councilmember moved its final adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and the ordinance adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
#16..
- 324 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX-C.S.

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 3, “ELECTRICAL CODE” OF TITLE 9, “BUILDING REGULATIONS” OF THE MODESTO MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO BUILDING REGULATIONS TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 18938 makes provisions published in the California Building Standards Code pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922 applicable to all occupancies throughout the State and effective one hundred and eighty days after publication by the California Building Standards Commission (the Commission), or at a later date established by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits cities in adopting provisions of the California Building Standards Code to make such changes in such provisions as the city determines, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that a city, before making changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5, must make an express finding that such changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, under Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 may not become effective until the required findings, and the changes, have been filed with the California Building Standards Commission; and WHEREAS, The City is not proposing any amendments to the California Building Code; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 50022.2 permits enactment of City Ordinances that adopt codes or statutes, including codes of the State of California, by reference; and #16..
- 325 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
WHEREAS, notice of the Ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and that such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Modesto does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CODE.

Chapter 3 entitled “Electrical Code” of Title 9 “Building Regulations” is hereby repealed in it’s entirely and replaced with the following:

Article 1. - Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Electrical Code 9-3.101 - Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Electrical Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the 2025 California Electrical Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3, as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), as now existing, or hereafter amended, regulating, governing and providing standards for the erection, installation, repair, relocation, replacement, addition to, use, or maintenance of electrical systems and parts thereof for the protection of public health and safety, providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees, providing penalties for the violation thereof; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said 2025 California Electrical Code on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, deletions, insertions, and changes if any, prescribed in this Chapter, be and hereby is adopted as the Electrical Code of the City of Modesto.

Effective:___________, 2026
thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

Effective:___________, 2026
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember , who moved its introduction and passage to print, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and ordered printed and published by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#16..
- 328 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026

FINAL ADOPTION CLAUSE
The foregoing ordinance, having been published as required by the Charter of the City of Modesto, and coming on for final consideration at the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the _________day of _____________, 2026, Councilmember moved its final adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and the ordinance adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
#16..
- 329 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025
ORDINANCE NO. xxxx-CS
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 7, “MECHANICAL CODE” OF TITLE 9, “BUILDING REGULATIONS” OF THE MODESTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 18938 makes provisions published in the California Building Standards Code pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922 applicable to all occupancies throughout the State and effective one hundred and eighty days after publication by the California Building Standards Commission (the Commission), or at a later date established by the Commission; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits cities in adopting provisions of the California Building Standards Code to make such changes in such provisions as the city determines, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that a city, before making changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5, must make an express finding that such changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, under Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 may not become effective until the required findings, and the changes, have been filed with the California Building Standards Commission; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 50022.2 permits enactment of City Ordinances that adopt codes or statutes, including codes of the State of California, by reference; and #16..
- 330 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025
WHEREAS, the City is not proposing any amendments to the California Building Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and that such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Modesto does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CODE.

Chapter 7, “Mechanical Code” of Title 9, “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following.

Chapter 7. MECHANICAL CODE
Article 1. - Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Mechanical Code 9-7.101 - Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Mechanical Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the 2025 California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 4, as published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), as now existing, or hereafter amended, which said Code governs and provides proper regulations of mechanical systems and parts thereof, including, but not limited to, addition to or erection, installation, alteration, repair, relocation, replacement, use, or maintenance of any heating, ventilation, cooling, refrigeration systems or equipment thereof; incinerators or parts or equipment thereof; or other miscellaneous heat producing appliances, parts or equipment thereof; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; providing for the inspection thereof; providing penalties for the violation thereof; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said 2025 California Mechanical Code on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, deletions, insertions, and changes, if any, prescribed in this Chapter, be and hereby is adopted as the Mechanical Code of the City of Modesto.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY
#16..
- 331 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

Effective:___________, 2025
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember , who moved its introduction and passage to print, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and ordered printed and published by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#16..
- 333 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2025

FINAL ADOPTION CLAUSE
The foregoing ordinance, having been published as required by the Charter of the City of Modesto, and coming on for final consideration at the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the ____ day of _________, 2026, Councilmember moved its final adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and the ordinance adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
#16..
- 334 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
ORDINANCE NO. xxxx-C.S.

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 11, “EXISTING BUILDING CODE” OF TITLE 9, “BUILDING REGULATIONS” OF THE MODESTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2025

CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILIDNG CODE
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 18938 makes provisions published in the California Building Standards Code pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922 applicable to all occupancies throughout the State and effective one hundred and eighty days after publication by the California Building Standards Commission (the Commission), or at a later date established by the Commission; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits cities in adopting provisions of the California Building Standards Code to make such changes in such provisions as the city determines, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that a city, before making changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5, must make an express finding that such changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, under Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, changes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 may not become effective until the required findings, and the changes, have been filed with the California Building Standards Commission; and
#16..
- 335 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 50022.2 permits enactment of City Ordinances that adopt codes or statutes, including codes of the State of California, by reference; and
WHEREAS, the City is not proposing any amendments to the California Existing Building Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Ordinance was published in accordance with Government Code Sections 50022.3 and 6066; and that such notice was sufficient to give notice to interested persons of the purpose of the ordinance and the subject matter thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Modesto does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CODE.

Chapter 11, “Existing Building Code” of Title 9, “Building Regulations” of the Modesto Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following.

Chapter 11. EXISTING BUILDING CODE
Article 1. Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Existing Building Code
9-1.101 Adoption by Reference of the 2025 California Existing Building Code.

That certain document, one (1) copy of which is on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto, being marked and designated as the 2025 California Existing Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 10, as published by the International Code Council, as now existing, or hereafter amended, regulating and governing the conditions of all properties, buildings, and structures; by providing the standards for facilities and other physical things and conditions essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupancy and use; and the #16..
- 336 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human occupancy and use and the demotion of such structures; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefor; and providing penalties for the violation thereof; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said 2025 California Existing Building Code on file in the Office of the Chief Building Official of the City of Modesto is hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof, as if fully set out in this ordinance, with the additions, deletions, insertions and changes, if any, prescribed in this Chapter, be and hereby is adopted as the Existing Building Code of the City of Modesto.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 5. PUBLICATION
#16..
- 337 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026
At least two (2) days prior to its final adoption, copies of this Ordinance shall be posted in at least three (3) prominent and distinct locations in the City; and a notice shall be published once in The Modesto Bee, the official newspaper of the City of Modesto, setting forth the title of this ordinance, the date of its introduction and the places where this Ordinance is posted.
#16..
- 338 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#16..
- 339 -
Ordinance No. XXXX-C.S.

Effective:___________, 2026

FINAL ADOPTION CLAUSE
The foregoing ordinance, having been published as required by the Charter of the City of Modesto, and coming on for final consideration at the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the ____ day of _________, 2026, Councilmember moved its final adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember , was upon roll call carried and the ordinance adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED: ____________________________

SUE ZWAHLEN, MAYOR
ATTEST: ____________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
#16..
- 340 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
Date: March 18, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Toby Wells, Director of Engineering Services Department / City Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project
CONTACT: Peter Kambel, Senior Civil Engineer, [email protected], 209-577-5444
DESCRIPTION:

Consider accepting the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project as complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $864,020 to Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA, and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. (Funding Source: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality and Measure L Funds)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the City’s 2025-26 Strategic Plan Area of Focus: Goal D: “Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Modesto applied for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds to install Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination Project through Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG). StanCOG approved the City of Modesto’s request for the CMAQ grant with design funds approved in March 2019 and $441,000 in construction funds in April 2019.

The Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination Project installed new fiber optic cable and ethernet switches into the traffic signal controller cabinets on Claus Road from #17..
- 341 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Accept the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal
Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project

Page 2 of 3 ends

Briggsmore Avenue to Creekwood Drive and on Scenic Drive from Bodem Avenue to Oakdale Road.

DISCUSSION:

The work for this project was advertised for bids on August 8, 2023. Bids were publicly opened on September 19, 2023, and Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA, was the only responsible bidder at 41.25% above the engineers estimate.

On November 7, 2023, by Resolution 2023-488, Council awarded a contract to Tennyson Electric, LLC., in the amount of $798,200. The Contractor received the Notice to Proceed with a start date of February 5, 2024. All contract work was completed on November 26, 2025.

By accepting this project as complete, the City officially accepts the improvements made and authorizes the Notice of Completion to be filed. The City Clerk is authorized to complete all the necessary steps to file the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder, release securities, and authorize payments totaling $864,020. The work is covered by a one-year warranty for any issues that may arise.

Staff recommends the project for acceptance as the contractor has complied with all contract requirements for the project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total project costs were $1,115,446, which included design, design support during construction (TJKM), construction, and construction administration costs. The total project amount originally budgeted was $1,184,723 which included $878,020 for the construction contract and contingency with Tennyson Electric, LLC.

The City’s “Change Order Approval Policy” enacted by Council Resolution No. 94-443 on July 19, 1994, updated by Resolution No. 2019-326 on July 9, 2019, and revised a second time September 12, 2023, by Resolution 2023-405 established a contract change order authority of 10% for construction contracts up to $10,000,000.

There were four (4) change orders resulting in an overall increase of $65,820 for change order work as listed on the attached change order log. A summary of the expenditures for the overall project is listed below.
101322 – Capital Grants – Streets CIP Projects – 3160 Claus Road Signal Coordination 101323 – Streets CIP Projects - 3160 Claus Road Signal Coordination #17..
- 342 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Accept the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal
Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project

Page 3 of 3 ends

PROJECT EXPENDITURES: % of Contract
Construction Contract $798,200
Construction Contingency (Change Orders) 8.25% $65,820
Construction Administration – City Staff Support 14.39% $114,876 Engineering Design/Admin. – City Staff Support/Misc. 4.94% $39,459 Design Support during Construction (TJKM) 12.16% $97,091 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES: $1,115,446
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

On March 16, 2022, the Economic Development Committee recommended forwarding the item to Council for approval along with future CIP Projects.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

Environmental review has been provided through a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301, (c) EA/PW 2023-001, filed August 8, 2023.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution accepting Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project as complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $864,020 to Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA, and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.

Approved by:
_____________________________________
Toby Wells, Director of Engineering Services/
City Engineer
_____________________________________
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Contract Change Order Log

3. Project (101322) Substantial Completion Notice

4. Project (101323) Substantial Completion Notice

5. Notice of Completion
#17..
- 343 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 1 2026-

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CLAUS ROAD AND SCENIC DRIVE SIGNAL COORDINATION, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) PROJECT AS

COMPLETE, RELEASING SECURITIES, RELEASING PAYMENTS
TOTALING $864,020 TO TENNYSON ELECTRIC, LLC. OF LIVERMORE, CA,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF

COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination Project installed new fiber optic cable and ethernet switches into the traffic signal controller cabinets on Claus Road from Briggsmore Avenue to Creekwood Drive and on Scenic Drive from Bodem Avenue to Oakdale Road; and
WHEREAS, the project was advertised for bids on August 8, 2023; and WHEREAS, bids were publicly opened on September 19, 2023, and Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA, was the only responsible bidder at 41.25% above the engineers estimate; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2023, by Resolution 2023-488, Council awarded a contract to Tennyson Electric, LLC., in the amount of $798,200; and WHEREAS,. the Contractor received the Notice to Proceed with a start date of February 5, 2024. All contract work was completed on November 26, 2025; and WHEREAS, the total project costs $1,115,446, which included design, design support during construction (TJKM), construction, and construction administration costs.

The total project amount originally budgeted was $1,184,723 which included $878,020 for the construction contract and contingency with Tennyson Electric, LLC; and WHEREAS, the City’s “Change Order Approval Policy” enacted by Council Resolution No. 94-443 on July 19, 1994, updated by Resolution No. 2019-326 on July 9, #17..
- 344 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 2 2026-
2019, and revised a second time September 12, 2023, by Resolution 2023-405 established a contract change order authority of 10% for construction contracts up to $10,000,000; and WHEREAS, there were four (4) change orders resulting in an overall increase of $65,820 for change order work as listed on the attached change order log; and WHEREAS, by accepting this project as complete, the City officially accepts the improvements made and authorizes the Notice of Completion to be filed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Modesto that the Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246) Project is complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $864,020 to Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA, and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
#17..
- 345 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 3 2026-
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember ?, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ?, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: ____________________________

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ______________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#17..
- 346 -
CHANGE
ORDER
NO. DESCRIPTION EXECUTED AMOUNT
CAUSE

UNFORSEEN

CONDITIONS
DESIGN
ISSUE
ADDED
SCOPE

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER LOG
Date: July 22, 2025
TIME
EXT. Approved
2023/20 - Claus Road (101322) and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination (101323) CML 5059(245 & 246) PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME:
01 Abandoned Foundation at Scenic/Bodem (101323) 07/02/24 $1,363.68 0 W.D. No No No Yes 02 Reuse of 48 Strand Fiber (101323) 07/02/24 $21,780.00 3 W.D. No No No Yes 03 Remove Bid Line #4 and Bid Line #11 Per PM request 09/23/24 -$13,500.00 0 W.D. No No Yes Yes 04 Bore and Install 3 Inch Conduit and 15 Additional
Working Days
07/21/25 $56,176.32 15 W.D. No Yes No Yes
Total Change Orders Processed To Date: $65,820.00
Original Contract Amount: $798,200.00
IDA To:

Total Working Days Time Extension: 18
Original Director's CCO Authority: $79,820.00
IDA Date: 11/7/2023
Total Executed Change Orders To Date: $65,820.00
#17..
- 347 -
CHANGE
ORDER
NO. DESCRIPTION EXECUTED AMOUNT
CAUSE

UNFORSEEN

CONDITIONS
DESIGN
ISSUE
ADDED
SCOPE

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER LOG
Date: July 22, 2025
TIME
EXT. Approved
#17..
- 348 -

MODESTO
Capital Project In Beneficial Use/Substantial Completion Notice ThisnoticemustbesubmittedtotheFinanceDepartmentwhen a capitalprojecthasreachedsubstantialcompletion,is in beneficial use or has entered the warranty period to meet financial reporting guidelines of depreciation.

Project #: 101322 Fund: 3160 Cost Center: 59999
Contact: Pete Kambel Ext: 75444
When the Project was Created was it Non-Capital or Capital: Non-Capital X Capital Project in Oracle: Claus Road Signal Coord
Project Description:
(What new infrastructure
was built/created)
Project In Use/Completion Date or Council Acceptance Date: Accepted April 7, 2026 Warranty Period X Yes No
Project expenses include (Check one):

If yes, Project Warranty End Date: April 7, 2027
Non-Capital X Capital Capital and Non-Capital*
If expenses are mixed - Amount of total expenses to be recorded as Capital, either dollar amount or percentage:
* IQproject expenses include Capital and Non-Capital, an Itemized list o/New Assets and Costs which make up the amount/percentage listed above must be provided with this form Authorization Signatures to Begin Depreciation of Project Expense Project Manager:

Financial Analyst(Budget): Directorof Finance: Financial Analyst (Assets):

Latest Revision
Date:

Date:

Date:
01-FEB-2025
Installation of new Fiber on Claus Road from
Briggsmore Avenue to Creekwood Drive.
#17..
- 349 -
#17..
- 350 -
#17..
- 351 -
#17..
- 352 -

Project #: 101323 Fund: 3160 Cost Center: 59999
Contact: Pete Kambel Ext: 75444
When the Project was Created was it Non-Capital or Capital: Non-Capital X Capital Project in Oracle: Scenic Dr Signal Coord
Project Description:
(What new infrastructure
was built/created)
Project In Use/Completion Date or Council Acceptance Date: Accepted April 7, 2026 Warranty Period X Yes No
Project expenses include (Check one):

Financial Analyst(Budget): Directorof Finance: Financial Analyst (Assets):

Latest Revision
Date:

Date:

Date:
01-FEB-2025
Installation of new Fiber on Scenic Drive from
Bodem Avenue to Oakdale Road.
#17..
- 353 -
#17..
- 354 -
#17..
- 355 -
#17..
- 356 -
Requested by
City of Modesto/City Clerk’s Office
Return to City of Modesto/City Clerk’s Office:

PO Box 642
Modesto CA 95353

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on March 12, 2024, the City of Modesto, PO Box 642, Modesto, California 95353, a Municipal Corporation in the County of Stanislaus, State of California, awarded the contract to Tennyson Electric, LLC. of Livermore, CA for the project titled “Claus Road and Scenic Drive Signal Coordination, CML 5059(245) & CML 5059(246)” located on Claus Road from Briggsmore Avenue to Creekwood Drive and on Scenic Avenue from Bodem Avenue to Oakdale Road. On November 26, 2025, said contract, as a whole, was completed by Tennyson Electric, LLC., and accepted by the Council of the City of Modesto at a regular meeting of the Council held on April 7, 2026.

CITY OF MODESTO
By
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: By
Modesto, CA Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
#17..
- 357 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
Date: March 18, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Toby Wells, Director of Engineering Services Department / City Engineer SUBJECT: Accept the 2024 Restroom Replacement Project
CONTACT: Peter Kambel, Senior Civil Engineer, [email protected], 209-577-5444
DESCRIPTION:

Consider accepting the 2024 Restroom Replacement Project as complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $570,290 to Platinum General Engineering, LLC, of Waterford, CA., and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. (Funding Source: Measure H)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the City’s 2025-26 Strategic Plan Area of Focus:

Quality of Life and Governance and Service Delivery.

BACKGROUND:

In June of 2023, by Resolution 2023-266 Council approved the FY 2023-2024 budget which included $6,100,000 of Measure H funding for deferred park maintenance. As part of the deferred park maintenance allocation, $1,400,000 was allocated to replace restrooms at Graceada Park, Mark Twain Park, and Robertson Road Park.

The 2024 Restroom Replacements Project replaced existing restroom structures with the installation of previously purchased prefabricated restroom buildings along with upgrades to the electrical, sewer, water, and irrigation lines to meet current building code requirements.

#18..
- 358 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Accept the 2024 Restroom Replacement Project

Page 2 of 3 ends

DISCUSSION:

The work for this project was advertised for bids on December 31, 2024. Bids were publicly opened on February 4, 2025, and Platinum General Engineering, LLC, of Waterford, CA., was the lowest responsible bidder at 16.69% below the engineers estimate.

On March 11, 2025, by Resolution 2025-92, Council awarded a contract to Platinum General Engineering, LLC, in the amount of $522,266. The Contractor received the Notice to Proceed with a start date of April 21, 2025. All contract work was completed on December 8, 2025.

By accepting this project as complete, the City officially accepts the improvements made and authorizes the Notice of Completion to be filed. The City Clerk is authorized to complete all the necessary steps to file Notice of Completion with the County Recorder, release securities, and authorize payments totaling $570,290. The work is covered by a one-year warranty for any issues that may arise.

Staff recommends the project for acceptance as the contractor has complied with all contract requirements for the project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total project costs were $1,797,336, which included previously purchased prefabricated buildings, design, construction, and construction administration costs. The total project amount originally budgeted was $1,789,438 which included $574,492 for the construction contract and contingency with Platinum General Engineering, LLC.

There were four (4) change orders resulting in an overall increase of $48,023.56 for change order work as listed on the attached change order log. A summary of the expenditures for the overall project is listed below.
101517 – PRN - 23-24 Deferred Maintenance – Measure H
PROJECT EXPENDITURES:

Construction Contract % of contract $522,266
Construction Contingency (Change Orders) 9.2% $48,024
Construction Administration – City Staff Support 15.99% $83,506 Engineering Design/Admin. – City Staff Support/Misc. 5.67% $29,623 Previously Purchased Equip. / Building $1,113,917
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES: $1,797,336
#18..
- 359 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Accept the 2024 Restroom Replacement Project

Page 3 of 3 ends

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

On January 13, 2025, the Safety & Communities Committee approved a list of upcoming Parks projects. The committee recommended the item be forwarded to Council for approval.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

City Staff prepared a Notice of Exemption No. EA/PR&N 2024-05. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA since it is a minor alteration to an existing facility involving a negligible expansion of the use beyond the current use.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution accepting the 2024 Restroom Replacements Project as complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $570,290 to Platinum General Engineering, LLC, of Waterford, CA., and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.

Approved by:
_____________________________________
Toby Wells, Director of Engineering Services/
City Engineer
_____________________________________
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Contract Change Order Log

3. Project (101517) Substantial Completion Notice

4. Notice of Completion
#18..
- 360 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 1 2026-

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2024 RESTROOM REPLACEMENT

PROJECT AS COMPLETE, RELEASING SECURITIES, RELEASING
PAYMENTS TOTALING $570,290 TO PLATINUM GENERAL ENGINEERING, LLC, OF WATERFORD, CA., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE

A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the 2024 Restroom Replacements Project replaced existing restroom structures with city purchased, pre-fabricated buildings along with upgrades to the electrical, sewer, water, and irrigation lines to meet current building code requirements; and
WHEREAS, the project was advertised for bids on December 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, bids were publicly opened on February 4, 2025, and Platinum General Engineering, LLC, of Waterford, CA., was the lowest responsible bidder at 16.69% below the engineers estimate; and
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2025, by Resolution 2025-92, Council awarded a contract to Platinum General Engineering, LLC, in the amount of $522,266; and WHEREAS, the Contractor received the Notice to Proceed with a start date of April 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the total project costs were $1,797,336, which included previously purchased prefabricated buildings, design, construction, and construction administration costs. The total project amount originally budgeted was $1,789,438 which included $574,492 for the construction contract and contingency with Platinum General Engineering, LLC.; and #18..
- 361 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 2 2026-
WHEREAS, the City’s “Change Order Approval Policy” enacted by Council Resolution No. 94-443 on July 19, 1994, updated by Resolution No. 2019-326 on July 9, 2019, and revised a second time September 12, 2023, by Resolution 2023-405 established a contract change order authority of 10% ($52,226) for construction contracts up to $10,000,000; and
WHEREAS, there were four (4) change orders resulting in an overall increase of $48,023.56 for change order work as listed on the attached change order log; and
WHEREAS, by accepting this project as complete, the City officially accepts the improvements made and authorizes the Notice of Completion to be filed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Modesto that the 2024 Restroom Replacement Project is complete, releasing securities, releasing payments totaling $570,290 to Platinum General Engineering, LLC, of Waterford, CA., and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
#18..
- 362 -
4/7/2026/ESD/PKambel 3 2026-
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember ?, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ?, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: ____________________________

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ______________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#18..
- 363 -
CHANGE
ORDER
NO. DESCRIPTION EXECUTED AMOUNT
CAUSE

UNFORSEEN

CONDITIONS
DESIGN
ISSUE
ADDED
SCOPE

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER LOG
Date: November 25, 2025
TIME
EXT. Approved
2025/16 - Modesto 2024 Restroom Replacements AU C - Rstrm Repl | TERRACON PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME:
01 4 Inch Water Main Relocation and 2 Additional Working Days
07/03/25 $26,385.49 2 W.D. No Yes No Yes
02 Robertson Park Electrica Upgrades and 15 Addiitonal
Working Days
07/23/25 $13,824.92 15 W.D. No Yes No Yes
03 Graceada Force Account & Robertson MID Fees and 30
Additional Working Days
11/25/25 $9,313.15 30 W.D. No No Yes Yes
04 Bid Line #319 Deductive Change Order 11/25/25 -$1,500.00 0 W.D. No Yes No Yes Total Change Orders Processed To Date: $48,023.56
Original Contract Amount: $522,265.64
IDA To: $52,226.00
Total Working Days Time Extension: 47
Original Director's CCO Authority: $52,226.00
IDA Date:

Total Executed Change Orders To Date: $48,023.56
#18..
- 364 -
CHANGE
ORDER
NO. DESCRIPTION EXECUTED AMOUNT
CAUSE

UNFORSEEN

CONDITIONS
DESIGN
ISSUE
ADDED
SCOPE

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER LOG
Date: November 25, 2025
TIME
EXT. Approved
#18..
- 365 -

MODESTO
Capital Project In Beneficial Use/Substantial Completion Notice ThisnoticemustbesubmittedtotheFinanceDepartmentwhenacapitalprojecthasreachedsubstantialcompletion,is in beneficial use or has entered the warranty period to meet financial reporting guidelines of depreciation.

Project #: 101517 Fund: 3122 Cost Center: 89998
Contact: Pete Kambel Ext: 75444
When the Project was Created was it Non-Capital or Capital: X Non-Capital Capital Project in Oracle: Prev Maint-Measure H
Project Description:
(What new infrastructure
was built/created)
Project In Use/Completion Date or Council Acceptance Date: Accepted April 7, 2026 Warranty Period X Yes No
Project expenses include (Check one):

If yes, Project Warranty End Date: April 7, 2027
X Non-Capital Capital Capital and Non-Capital*
If expenses are mixed - Amount of total expenses to be recorded as Capital, either dollar amount or percentage:
* IQproject expenses include Capital and Non-Capital, an Itemized list o/New Assets and Costs which make up the amount/percentage listed above must be provided with this form Authorization Signatures to Begin Depreciation of Project Expense Project Manager:

Financial Analyst(Budget):

Directorof Finance:

Financial Analyst (Assets):

Latest Revision
Date:

Date:

Date:
01-FEB-2025
Restroom Replacement Specifically ending task
line for restroom replacement, leaving all other
task lines available for future projects.
#18..
- 366 -
#18..
- 367 -
#18..
- 368 -
#18..
- 369 -
Requested by
City of Modesto/City Clerk’s Office
Return to City of Modesto/City Clerk’s Office:

PO Box 642
Modesto CA 95353

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on March 12, 2024, the City of Modesto, PO Box 642, Modesto, California 95353, a Municipal Corporation in the County of Stanislaus, State of California, awarded the contract Platinum General Engineering, LLC Waterford, CA for the project titled “2024 Restroom Replacement” located Graceada Park, Mark Twain Park, and Robertson Road Park. On December 8, 2025, said contract, as a whole, was completed by Platinum General Engineering, LLC., and accepted by the Council of the City of Modesto at a regular meeting of the Council held on April 7, 2026.

CITY OF MODESTO
By
Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: By
Modesto, CA Diane Nayares-Perez, City Clerk
#18..
- 370 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

April 7, 2026
March 18, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Toby Wells, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer SUBJECT: Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan
CONTACT: Michael Sacuskie, Assistant City Engineer, [email protected], 209-571-5552
DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan and adopting the Vision Zero Resolution Authorizing City staff to apply for SS4A Grant Implementation Funds to eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes. (Funding Source:

Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant and Measure L Funds) STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

This recommended action is in conformance with City of Modesto 2025-2026 Strategic Plan Element: “Quality of Life”, Goal A: “Improve community safety and quality of life, through a combination of prevention and intervention efforts that address safety and its underlying issues.”
BACKGROUND:

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law1 (BIL) established a new Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant program with $5 billion in appropriated funds over the next five (5) years. The SS4A program funds regional, local, and Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. The primary goal of SS4A grants is to improve roadway safety by supporting communities in developing comprehensive safety action plans based on a Safe System Approach2, and implementing projects and strategies that significantly reduce or eliminate transportation-related fatalities and serious injuries involving pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation, commercial vehicle operators, and motorists.
1 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/ 2 What Is a Safe System Approach? | US Department of Transportation #19..
- 371 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan

Page 2 of 4 ends

On September 13, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-381, Council approved the City to pursue grant funding to develop a Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan.

On May 2, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-204, Council accepted the grant funds and directed staff to proceed with developing a comprehensive plan.

On June 4, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-184, Council awarded an agreement to Alta Planning + Design Inc., Oakland, CA, to develop our Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan.

DISCUSSION:

Between 2016 and 2023, the City of Modesto experienced nearly 9,400 injury collisions, with approximately 7% resulting in fatal or serious injuries. In 2022, Modesto ranked worst among 64 peer cities (with similar population sizes) in California for the total number of fatal and injury collisions.

In Modesto, traffic safety is not only about numbers - it’s about people, families, and communities forever changed by crashes. The analysis conducted to develop this Action Plan is based on five objectives:

1. Safe Users – People living, working, or traveling in Modesto should be safe getting around regardless of whether they are walking, rolling, biking, taking transit, or driving.

2. Safe Vehicles – Promote vehicle design and regulation that minimize collisions, reduce severity, and incorporate safety measures using the latest technology and incorporating cutting edge research findings.

3. Safe Roadways – Human error is inevitable. Roads should be designed so that human error or other circumstances leading to collisions do not result in death or severe injury.

4. Safe Speeds – Slower travel speeds lower the force of impact in a crash, especially for people walking or biking, which helps prevent serious injuries and saves lives.

5. Post-Crash Care – When crashes happen, quick emergency response and using data to make systemwide improvements can help save lives.

The commitment of this Action Plan is to work across departments and with community partners to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic collision deaths and serious injuries in the City of Modesto. The goal is to reduce 50% by 2045. #19..
- 372 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan

Page 3 of 4 ends

The Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan was developed with other Engineering and Planning Documents in mind, including the Systemic Safety Analysis Report, Local Roadway Safety Plan, Non-Motorized Master Plan Update and School Safety Program Study.

After the crash data was collected and analyzed, the project team began engaging with the community to integrate our local priorities and experiences into plan elements. A Safety Task Force was created and included representatives from the following organizations: City of Modesto, Empire Union School District, Love to Ride, Modesto City Schools, Modesto Junior College, Safe Kids Stanislaus, Stanislaus Council of Governments, Stanislaus County Health Services Agency, Stanislaus Union School District, Sutter Health, Sylvan Union School District, and Visually Impaired Persons Support.

Next steps are to implement Safe Street strategies and apply for grant implementation funding from the SS4A Program. The five-year implementation workplan translates the Action Plan’s highest priority strategies into a feasible, phased program, aligned with the City’s staffing, funding, and delivery capacity.

After Council approval, this action will authorize the City Manager or his designee to allow staff to apply for the upcoming SS4A grant program.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no minimum or maximum funding award value for the SS4A grant. Recipients are required to contribute a local matching share of no less than 20 percent of eligible activity costs. All matching funds must be from non-Federal sources, which could include in-kind contributions, funding from the applicant, or other SS4A-eligible nonFederal sources partnering with the applicant.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

Environmental review for each project will take place during the Preliminary Engineering phase.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution accepting the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan and adopting the Vision Zero Resolution Authorizing City staff to apply for the Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant for Implementation Funds.
#19..
- 373 -
City Council, April 7, 2026
Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan

Page 4 of 4 ends

Approved by:

Toby Wells, Director of Engineering
Services / City Engineer
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Vision Zero Resolution

2. Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan and Appendices B-N #19..
- 374 -
04/07/2026/ESD/M. Sacuskie/Item 1 2026-

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RESOLUTION

AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO APPLY FOR THE SAFE STREETS AND

ROADS FOR ALL GRANT FOR IMPLEMENTATION FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law1 (BIL) established a new Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant program with $5 billion in appropriated funds over the next five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, the primary goal of SS4A grants is to improve roadway safety by supporting communities in developing comprehensive safety action plans based on a Safe System Approach2, and implementing projects and strategies that significantly reduce or eliminate transportation-related fatalities and serious injuries involving pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation, commercial vehicle operators, and motorists; and WHEREAS, a five-year implementation workplan translates the Action Plan’s highest priority strategies into feasible, phased program aligned with the City’s staffing, funding, delivery capacity; and
WHEREAS, the commitment of this Action Plan is to work across departments and with community partners to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic collision deaths and serious injuries in the City of Modesto. The goal is to reduce 50% by 2045; and WHEREAS, the Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan and this Vision Zero Resolution supports the City’s eligibility for the Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program.
1 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/ 2 What Is a Safe System Approach? | US Department of Transportation #19..
- 375 -
04/07/2026/ESD/M. Sacuskie/Item 2 2026-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby accepts the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan and adopts the Vision Zero Resolution Authorizing City staff to apply for Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Implementation Funds.

The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 7th day of April, 2026, by Councilmember ?, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ?, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ?
NOES: Councilmembers: ?
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ?
ATTEST: _____________________________

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#19..
- 376 -
Safe Streets
and Roads
for All
Action Plan
APRIL 2026
#19..
- 377 -
A Message from
Mayor Zwahlen
Our streets are more than just pavement and painted lines. They connect us to schools, jobs, parks, and neighborhoods. They are the places where our community comes together.

Because of that, every person who lives, works, and travels in Modesto deserves to feel safe getting where they need to go, whether they walk, bike, drive, or ride transit.

This Safety Action Plan represents Modesto’s commitment to a future where serious crashes are no longer accepted as inevitable. It reflects our adoption of Vision Zero principles, which guide us toward designing a transportation system where human mistakes do not result in tragedy. It builds on work already underway, including safer street designs, traffic safety campaigns, and new data tools that help us identify and address risks before tragedies occur.

Through the Safe System Approach, we can take proactive steps to make our streets safer for everyone who uses them. I served as an Emergency Room nurse for 42 years and understand firsthand the importance of public safety.

With support from the federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program, the City has identified the streets where people are most at risks, outlined projects that make the greatest impact, and developed a blueprint for long-term safety investments. From High Injury Network corridors to safer routes to schools, this plan provides a roadmap for how we can save lives and improve daily travel for every Modestan.

I want to thank the many residents, community partners, and City staff who contributed to this effort. Together, we are shaping a safer, more connected Modesto—one where every trip, no matter how short or long, begins and ends safely.

Sue Zwahlen
Mayor, City of Modesto

CITY REVIEW IN PROGRESS
I
#19..
- 378 -
Our Commitment
Unlike traditional traffic safety approaches that focus on individual behavior or assign blame after a crash occurs, Vision Zero takes a proactive and systemic approach. It uses data, systems thinking, and thoughtful street design to reduce the likelihood that a single mistake will result in a fatal or life-altering injury. Vision Zero principles recognize that humans will make errors, but the transportation system can be designed to ensure those mistakes are not deadly. Together, we pledge to make safety the foundation of every transportation decision. A Vision Zero Resolution developed as part of this plan affirms the City’s pledge to work across departments and with community partners to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries.1 Guided by the Safety Action
Plan, we will work across departments and with community partners to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries in Modesto.

We commit to incorporating the plan’s guiding principles, strategies, and priorities into our department’s practices to halve traffic deaths and severe injuries by 2045 and work toward their eventual elimination.
Joseph Lopez, City Manager
Scotty Douglass, Deputy City Manager
Allison Van Guilder, Deputy City Manager
Jose M. Sanchez, City Attorney
Toby Wells PE, City Engineer/Director of Engineering Services Bill Sandhu PE, Director of Public Works
Jessica Hill, Director of Community & Economic Development Sonya Severo, Public Relations and Legislative Affairs Manager Brandon Gillespie, Chief of Police Department
Christina Alger, Director of Human Resources
1 Appendix A: Vision Zero Resolution

CITY REVIEW IN PROGRESS
II
#19..
- 379 -
One Traffic Death
Is Too Many
Each serious crash represents a person, a family,
and a community affected by tragedy. Every life
lost or forever changed in a traffic crash is one
too many. These are not statistics but reminders
of the responsibility we all share to make
Modesto’s streets safer for everyone.

This Safety Action Plan reflects our
community’s shared goal to avoid these
tragedies and enable every trip on our
streets to begin and end safely.

III
#19..
- 380 -
PREPARED BY:

IN ASSOCIATION WITH:

Safety Task Force
Lizett Aguilar, Sylvan Union
School District
Claudia Camarena, Empire Union
School District
Laura Cisneros, Love to Ride
Susan Dion, League of American
Bicyclists Instructor
Jill Erikson, Stanislaus County Health
Services Agency
Elisabeth Hahn, Stanislaus Council of
Governments (Retired)
Rena Bryant, Doctors Medical Center &
Safe Kids Stanislaus
Crista Noakes, Modesto Junior College
Roger Orth, Modesto City Schools
Yolanda Perregil, Modesto Junior College
Erika Gomez Rodriguez, Stanislaus
County Health Services Agency
Shannon Sanford, Stanislaus Union
School District
Isaiah Siordia, Visually Impaired Persons
Support (VIPS)
C.W. Smith, Empire Union School District
Courtney Steele, Sutter Health
Sandra Tyler, Sylvan Union School District
Jeremiah Williams, District 5
Council Member
Sue Zwahlen, City of Modesto Mayor
Thank You!
City of Modesto Staff
Ryan Brady, Engineering Assistant Trainee,
Transportation Engineering & Design
Sergeant Robert Hall, Traffic Enforcement,
Police Department
Michael Hren, Principal Planner,
Planning Division
Mark Murphy TE, Traffic Operations
Engineer, Public Works Department
Max Navarro, Associate Engineer, Safety
Action Plan Project Manager
Michael Sacuskie, TE, Assistant City
Engineer, Transportation Engineering
& Design
Sandeep Sandhu, Associate Engineer,
Transportation Engineering & Design
Sonya Severo, Public Relations and
Legislative Affairs
Phillip Soares, PE, TE, MPA, Traffic Engineer,
Transportation Engineering & Design
IV
#19..
- 381 -
Table of Contents
01 Why Safe Streets
and Roads For All?
Why Safe Streets and Roads for All? . . . . . 1
Why Is It Different? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
The Safe System Approach . . . . . . . . . . 3
Why Does Modesto Need Vision Zero? . . 4
Vision Zero . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 How Do We Build Momentum? . . . . . . . 6
02 Safety in Modesto Today
What Is the Crash Data Telling Us? . . . . . 9
Safety Action Plan StoryMap . . . . . . . . . 10
Modesto Collision Types and Factors . . . . 11
Crashes Along the HIN . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Collision Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Everyone Deserves to Be Safe . . . . . . . 36
03 What You Told Us
Safety Task Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Listening to the Voice
of the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
What we Heard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Community Priorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Looking Ahead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
04 Safe Street Strategies
A Systems Approach To Safety . . . . . . . 46
Our Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Policy and Programmatic Strategies . . . 48
05 Improving Modesto’s Streets
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81
Anatomy of a Safe Street . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Celebrating Modesto’s Successes . . . . . 86
Modesto’s Countermeasures . . . . . . . . 90
Safety Countermeasure Toolbox . . . . . . .91
Countermeasures for Collision Profiles . . 95
06 A Roadmap for
Transformative
Safety Change
Prioritization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Systemic Safety Blueprint . . . . . . . . . . 111
Traffic Safety Campaign . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Funding Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . .138
Safety Demonstration Projects . . . . . . . 141
Measuring Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
07 Appendices
Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
V
#19..
- 382 -
Why Safe Streets
and Roads For All?
01 #19..
- 383 -
Why Safe Streets and Roads for All?
Every person in Modesto deserves to travel safely whether walking, biking, taking transit, using a wheelchair, or driving. Yet too many lives are lost or forever changed on our streets each year due to traffic collisions.

Traffic safety in Modesto is not only about
numbers—it’s about people, families, and
communities forever changed by crashes.

The analysis conducted for this plan shows
that these tragedies do not occur at random.

Instead, they are concentrated on a relatively
small number of streets within Modesto’s
High Injury Network, where the risk of serious
injury and death is greatest.

This Safety Action Plan reflects Modesto’s
commitment to building a transportation
system that prevents tragedies before
they occur. Guided by the Safe System
Approach, this plan recognizes that
people make mistakes, but those
mistakes should not be deadly.

Just as cities across California and the nation
have embraced Vision Zero principles,
Modesto is joining a growing movement that
treats safety as a shared responsibility and a
moral imperative.
1Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 384 -
Why Is It
Different?
2 For more information on the Safe System
Approach, visit: https://highways.dot.gov/
safety/zero-deaths
The Safe System Approach
is a departure from how
many communities have
planned, designed, built,
and managed roadways
in the past.

It is a framework developed by the Federal
Highway Administration, both to prevent
collisions from happening in the first place
and to minimize the harm to those involved
when collisions do occur. It is a way of
thinking that is anchored by the idea that
roadway fatalities and serious injuries are
not inevitable but are preventable. A Safe
System is one where decisions around how
we build our community, how we design our
streets, and how we get around Modesto,
all have significant impacts on making our
roads safer.2
Safe
Vehicles
THE

SAFE SYSTEM

APPROACH
Safe
Speeds
Post-Crash
Care
Safe
Roads
Safe Road
Users
• R
E
D
U
N
DANCY
IS CRUCIAL • DEATH/SERIOUS INJURY IS UNACCEPTABLE • HUMANS MAKE
MISTAK
E
S •
SAFETY IS PROACTIVE • RESPONSIBILITY IS SHARED • HUMANS ARE VULNERABLE 2Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 385 -
Objectives of the Safe System Approach
“I care deeply about road
safety in our community
and have seen enough
articles in the Modesto Bee
covering another deadly
collision, pedestrian fatality,
or cyclist death.”
– Modesto
Community Member
Safe Users
People living, working, or traveling in Modesto should be safe getting around regardless of whether they are walking, rolling, biking, taking transit, or driving.

Safe Vehicles
Promote vehicle designs and regulation that minimize collisions, reduce severity, and incorporate safety measures using the latest technology and incorporating cutting edge research findings.

Safe Roadways
Human error is inevitable. Roads should be designed so that human error or other circumstances leading to collisions do not result in death or severe injury.

Safe Speeds
Slower travel speeds lower the force of impact in a crash, especially for people walking or biking, which helps prevent serious injuries and saves lives.

Post-Crash Care
When crashes happen, quick emergency response and using data to make systemwide improvements can help save lives.
3Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 386 -
Top Safety Issues According
to Modestans:

Speeding and aggressive driving
Unsafe conditions for walking and biking
Drivers ignoring traffic laws
Sidewalks that are difficult to navigate
Traditional traffic safety
programs often focus on
individual behavior, assigning
fault and responding after
a collision occurs.
3 Transportation Injury Mapping System,
2016-2023.
4 “Mid-sized cities” are defined as jurisdictions
with populations between 100,001 and 250,000,
corresponding with the California Office of Traffic
Safety (OTS) Group B city classification. California
OTS Rankings, 2022.

Vision Zero principles are different. They use
data, systems thinking, and proactive design
to help eliminate the possibility that a single
mistake will result in a fatal or serious injury.

Between 2016 and 2023, the City of Modesto
experienced nearly 9,400 injury collisions,
with approximately 7% resulting in fatal or
severe injuries.3 In 2022, Modesto had the
highest number of total fatal and injury
collisions, alcohol-involved collisions, and
nighttime collisions among mid-sized
California cities, underscoring urgent and
systemic traffic safety challenges.4 Behind
these statistics are real people and families
affected by tragedy on Modesto’s streets.

Why Does Modesto Need Vision Zero?
4Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 387 -
Killed and Severe Injury (KSI) Crashes in Modesto
Approximately 7% of all injury collisions result in a fatal or severe injury 26% of all KSI collisions involve people walking
16% of all KSI collisions involve people riding a motorcycle 10% of all KSI collisions involve people riding a bicycle 18%
82%
Serious
Injury
Fatality
KSI
Crashes
10%
48%
Others
Bicycle Involved
16%
Motorcycle
Involved
26%
Pedestrian
Involved
KSI
Crashes
Vision Zero
Guided by the Safe
System Approach,
Vision Zero is a strategy
to eliminate all traffic
fatalities and serious
injuries on roadways.

It typically involves redesigning the
transportation system and the policies
and processes that guide it to prioritize
safety for all road users.

Figure 1 • Distribution of All KSI Crashes
by Severity
Figure 2 • Distribution of KSI Crashes by
Vulnerable Road User Type
5Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 388 -
How Do We Build Momentum?
Modesto is taking
important steps to create
safer streets for everyone.

The City is moving toward a proactive,
data-informed approach that focuses on
preventing serious collisions before they
happen. Police already review collision trends
weekly and target enforcement where the risk
of severe injury is greatest. Radar feedback
signs and mobile speed trailers are deployed
using collision data, with more scheduled for
installation through new safety grants.

The City is modernizing streets
through technology, design, and policy
improvements. About one-third of Modesto’s
traffic signals are now part of a coordinated
network that enables real-time monitoring,
while Intelligent Transportation System
(ITS) upgrades like emergency vehicle
preemption enhance safety and efficiency
at busy intersections. Complementing these
operational improvements, the City has
installed 41 roundabouts and traffic circles,
with six more in design or construction,
reducing conflict points and speeds to lower
crash risk. Modesto is also improving curb
zones and reviewing new developments to
ensure safe access for all users.

This Safety Action Plan builds on many of
Modesto’s earlier initiatives and planning
efforts that have set the stage for a safer
system. These prior efforts have produced
studies, design concepts, safety campaigns,
and program improvements that collectively
form a foundation for citywide safety
transformation. This plan builds upon and
consolidates these past milestones and
creates a comprehensive approach that
positions Modesto to deliver meaningful,
systemwide safety change and enables longterm progress toward achieving Vision Zero.

Modesto’s next phase will strengthen
its commitment to safety. As part of this
plan, the City has developed measurable
goals and tools to track progress, supported
by a citywide inventory of sidewalks,
bikeways, and intersections to guide future
investments. Updated policies and processes
will enable safer outcomes, and typology
based recommendations and early design
ideas were shared with the community and
the Safety Task Force, allowing Modesto
to refine improvements, identify priorities,
and build support for the safety strategies
recommended in this plan.

Partnerships are also expanding.

Collaboration with public health and
community organizations will help safety
improvements benefit all residents, especially
those most affected by traffic injuries.

Together, these actions
represent a cultural shift
in how Modesto plans,
designs, and manages
its transportation system,
placing people first and
building momentum
toward zero traffic deaths
and serious injuries.
6Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 389 -
StanCOG adopts
the countywide
Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan
Stanislaus County
voters approve
Measure L, a
transportation
sales tax funding
local safety, active
transportation,
and street
improvement
projects
Modesto
completes its
Systemic Safety
Analysis Report
(SSAR)
Modesto adopts
its Local Road
Safety Plan
(LRSP)
Modesto adopts
the citywide
Non-Motorized
Transportation
Master Plan
(NMTP)
Modesto
launches its
Safe Streets and
Roads for All
(SS4A) Safety
Action Plan
process
Implementation
of Year 1
Workplan
Completed
Modesto adopts
the Downtown
Master Plan,
advancing safer,
walkable streets
in the city core
StanCOG
releases the
Active Transpor
tation Toolkit to
help guide
regional bicycle
and pedestrian
safety planning
StanCOG adopts
the Regional
Transportation
Plan and
Sustainable
Communities
Strategy
(RTP/SCS)
Modesto’s
School Program
Safety Study
is 2024
Vision Zero
Resolution
and Adoption
of Safety
Action Plan
2013
2016
2020
2021
2021
2022
2022
2024
2024
2025
2026
2027
Road Safety Planning and Policy Milestones
The following timeline highlights key milestones that have shaped Modesto’s safety journey so far, demonstrating the steady evolution toward a more proactive and collaborative safety culture. 7Why Safe Streets and Roads For All?
#19..
- 390 -
Safety in Modesto Today
02 #19..
- 391 -
What Is the Crash Data Telling Us?
This analysis reinforces the experiences and
concerns shared by people who live and
work in Modesto. Community members
consistently describe safety challenges on city
streets, and the data helps illustrate where
and how those risks are occurring. If people
believe too many community members
are seriously injured or killed while walking,
rolling, biking, driving, or taking transit,
the evidence helps show the scale of the
problem and underscores the importance of
taking action.

While collision data is essential for
understanding traffic safety, it only tells
part of the story. This plan acknowledges
that it only captures incidents that have
been officially reported. Many near-miss
events go unreported, even though they
affect how people move and how safe they
feel on Modesto’s streets. Considering these
limitations, collision data serves as a baseline
measure of safety performance. Locations
with frequent or severe crashes reveal
the most critical safety issues and
help the City identify risk factors and
prioritize improvements across the
transportation network.

Implementation of a Safe System is a data-driven process. 5 Collision data was collected from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) – a statewide database of traffic records. In August 2024, when the TIMS dataset was pulled, 2022 and 2023 data sets were identified as preliminary data. Although not yet final, these years of collisions were included to show Modesto’s most recent trends in collisions.

As a primary step to developing recommendations for this Safety Action Plan, eight years of collision data (2016–2023) were analyzed to identify patterns in collision severity, type, and location.5
How Was the Data Evaluated?
WHAT
What does the data tell us overall, such
as the total number of people killed or
seriously injured. What are the collision
trends year-over-year?
WHO
Who are represented in the collision
data? Do trends vary by mode or based
on demographics?
HOW
How are collisions occurring? Do we
know which factors are contributing
to collisions, such as drivers traveling
at unsafe speed or failing to observe
traffic lights?
WHERE
Where are collisions occurring? Which
locations in the city experience the
greatest number of severe collisions?
9Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 392 -
Safety
Action Plan
StoryMap
Transparent data is essential to building a
safe system. Modesto’s publicly available
data tools help residents understand
where crashes are happening and what
factors contribute to them. The Safety
Action Plan StoryMap provides a way for
the community to view highlights from
this plan, including collision trends and
the High Injury Network.

STORYMAP FORTHCOMING
10Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 393 -
Modesto Collision Types and Factors
Understanding the types
and factors behind severe
crashes is essential to
building a Safe System.

By examining why and where serious
collisions occur, Modesto can identify the
consistent trends that make a Vision Zero
approach necessary. For example, three
collision types account for most of Modesto’s
severe crashes, while a similar number of
collisions factors—including impaired driving,
pedestrian related factors, and failure to
yield—make up more than half of all fatal and
serious injury collisions. Likewise, vulnerable
road users continue to be significantly
overrepresented in Modesto’s most severe
crashes. These findings highlight the need to
address safety issues systematically through
a shift toward a Safe System and Vision Zero
framework that addresses underlying risks
across the entire network, ensuring that when
mistakes happen, they do not lead to tragedy.
9,397 injuries were reported, averaging
1,400 per year (Figure 3).

Approximately 7% of collisions resulted in
death or serious injury.
1284 1392 1330 1321
1102
1347 1366 1255
87 90 95 106
108
104 91
80 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Collisions
Non KSI Crashes KSI Crashes
Figure 3 • Killed or Severe Injury (KSI) and non-KSI crashes, 2016 -2023 Top Collision Types
The top three collision types account for 70% of serious collisions. These include:

Broadside: Collisions where the front end of one vehicle strikes the side of another at a right angle (aka T-Bone crash).

Vehicle-pedestrian: Any collision involving both a motor vehicle and a pedestrian.

Hit object: A collision where a vehicle hits any object that is fixed or a non-vehicular object in or near the roadway, such as a tree or guardrail. 11Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 394 -
Primary collision factors include
impaired driving (19% of KSI crashes),
pedestrian-related causes (19%), and
failure to yield the right-of-way (14%).6
Combined, these factors are represented
in over half of all serious injury crashes
in Modesto.
Speed continues to be a defining risk.

Unsafe speed is cited as the primary
violation type in 11% of crashes. Even
where “unsafe speed” is not cited as the
primary violation type, it is often a factor
in severe and fatal collisions.
Most severe pedestrian and bicycle
collisions in Modesto occur at night,
indicating lighting conditions are a
potential factor in KSI crashes, especially
for vulnerable road users. The risk is
even greater in areas without adequate
lighting. For all nighttime collisions
that occurred where streetlights were
present and functioning, 43% involved
people walking or biking. In areas where
streetlights do not exist or are not
functioning, that share rose to 56%.
6 The pedestrian-related causes category combines both Pedestrian Violation and Pedestrian Right of Way Violation records. A Pedestrian Violation indicates that the pedestrian did not follow a rule of the road, such as crossing outside a crosswalk. A Pedestrian Right of Way Violation indicates that the driver failed to yield to a pedestrian. In many cases, Pedestrian Violations may be overreported because details about the collision are unclear or the pedestrian is unable to provide their account. For this reason, this plan groups all pedestrian related collisions into a single category rather than distinguishing between the two.

Top Collision Factors
35%
Daytime
65%
Nighttime
Bicycle
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
Figure 4 • Distribution of Bike and Pedestrian KSI Collisions by Time of Day 2023 12Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 395 -
Where is the Risk?
Understanding roadway risk in Modesto
begins with recognizing that severe crashes
follow patterns. They occur most often in
places where roadway design, land use, and
traffic activity create high levels of exposure
and conflict. To identify where improvements
are most needed, this plan uses several
complementary analyses. First, the High
Injury Network (HIN) was developed to
highlight the share of streets where most
fatal and severe injury crashes occur. Second,
Collision Profiles were created by combining
patterns in collision types, contributing
factors, and collision hotspot locations to
reveal common crash scenarios and ultimately
guide targeted recommendations for each.

Finally, a Proactive Risk Assessment identifies
corridors where roadway characteristics, such
as lane count, speed, crossing opportunities,
and adjacent land uses, create elevated risk
even in locations without a history of crashes.

Together, these analyses reveal not only where
severe collisions have occurred, but also where
they are most likely to occur in the future if
roadway conditions remain the same. This
section also considers how some of Modesto’s
communities experience a disproportionate
share of the city’s safety challenges, including
higher concentrations of severe crashes, more
collision hotspots, and greater exposure to
the roadway and environmental factors that
elevate risk.

High-Injury
Network
A central outcome of the collision analysis is
Modesto’s High Injury Network, which identifies
the small share of streets where most severe
and fatal collisions occur. By focusing on these
high-risk corridors, the City can direct safety
improvements to the places that will save the
most lives and prevent the most serious injuries.

Typical HIN corridors in Modesto include:
Arterial roadways with high traffic
volumes and multiple lanes
Commercial and mixed-use zones with
frequent driveways and signals
Areas with overlapping pedestrian,
bicycle, and vehicle activity
The HIN for all collisions only
makes up about
7% OF MODESTO’S TOTAL
STREET NETWORK.

Yet, those streets account for
66% OF ALL SERIOUS

INJURY COLLISIONS CITYWIDE
13Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 396 -

VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
The term vulnerable road user (VRU) mostly
refers to people who are not protected by
a vehicle, like a car or truck. Because they
do not have an outer shell to protect them,
they are more likely to be hurt if they are hit
by a vehicle. For this reason, they need extra
protection to stay safe on the road.

This broad term can include many people,
such as pedestrians, people using wheelchairs
or other mobility devices (with or without
motors), people riding electric scooters, and
people riding bicycles or other non-motorized
forms of transportation.

Separate HINs were also developed for
collisions involving walking (Map 2) and biking (Map 3):

The HIN for pedestrian collisions
represents about
7% OF STREETS,
but accounts for
87% OF PEDESTRIANRELATED DEATHS AND
SERIOUS INJURIES.

The HIN for bicycle collisions
covers just
6% OF MODESTO’S

STREETS,
yet includes
92% OF ALL SERIOUS OR
FATAL BIKE COLLISIONS.
14Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 397 -
21 9
108
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
HIN - All Collisions
HIN - All Collisions
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST H ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I ST J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
99 132
108
Map 1 • HIN for All Collisions
Safety in Modesto Today
15 #19..
- 398 -
219
108
108
132 132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE
O

AKDALE RD EL VISTA
AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR

LA LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE

W HATCH RD

W UNION AVE

DRY CREEK DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE

VINTAGE DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE

PENNY LN

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST

SCENIC DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD

E BRIGGSMORE AVE

PELANDALE AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE

MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 12/4/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
HIN - Pedestrian
Collisions
HIN - Pedestrian Collisions
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
99 132
108

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST
H ST
G ST

SIERRA DR
6TH ST
5TH ST
L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST
I ST
J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST
11TH ST
12TH ST
9TH ST
Map 2 • HIN for Pedestrian Collisions
Safety in Modesto Today
16 #19..
- 399 -
219
108
108
132 132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

FINE AVE

SUTTER AVE
O

AKDALE RD EL VISTA
AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR

LA LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE

W HATCH RD

W UNION AVE

DRY CREEK DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE

VINTAGE DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE

PENNY LN

YOSEMITE BLVD

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST

SCENIC DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD

E BRIGGSMORE AVE

PELANDALE AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE

MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 12/4/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
HIN - Bike Collisions
HIN - Bike Collisions
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
99 132
108

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST
H ST
G ST

SIERRA DR
6TH ST
5TH ST
L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST
I ST
J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST
11TH ST
12TH ST
9TH ST
Map 3 • HIN for Bicycle Collisions
Safety in Modesto Today
17 #19..
- 400 -
Crashes
Along
the HIN
7%
of streets carry 66% of Modesto’s
fatal and serious injury crashes
7%
of streets see 87% of severe
pedestrian collisions
6%
of streets see 92% of severe
bicycle collisions
These networks reveal clear patterns: Many
of the highest-risk corridors run through the
downtown core and along major east-west
routes such as Orangeburg Avenue and
Yosemite Boulevard, which carry heavy
traffic and connect neighborhoods across the
city. Key north-south routes of prominence
along the HIN include Tully Road, McHenry
Avenue, and Oakdale Road.

State vs.

Local Roadways
While most of Modesto’s streets are locally
controlled, several corridors within the
HIN are owned and operated by Caltrans.

These state routes, which often carry higher
traffic volumes and speeds, account for a
disproportionate share of severe collisions.

Continued collaboration with Caltrans and
regional partners will be essential to advance
Vision Zero principles along these corridors.

Coordination will focus on joint safety audits,
corridor redesigns, and funding strategies for
shared priority projects.
18Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 401 -
Collision Profiles
Collision Profiles were created to better
understand where and why serious crashes
happen in Modesto. By combining patterns
in collision factors and types with additional
context such as the presence of transit stops,
unsignalized intersections, and collision
hotspots, these profiles highlight common
crash patterns across different parts of the
transportation network.

Each profile includes a short description,
trends within the profile, and a summary
of their makeup among all collision data.

Collisions can appear in more than one
profile, but together they provide a deeper
look at where Modesto’s safety risks exist.

Additional detail on these analyses, including
the Collision Profiles and the High Injury
Network, is provided in Appendix B: Collision
Landscape Summary, High Injury Network,
and Safety Profiles Memorandum.
7 7 SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities and Area of Persistent Poverty equity datasets are used in this plan to reflect the most current national and statewide definitions of equity priority areas, in contrast to the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Equitable Transportation Community (ETC) dataset shown in Appendix B, which is no longer available as of January 2025. The USDOT ETC dataset is retained only for Collision Profile 1 to maintain the integrity of the crash statistics originally developed for that profile.

COLLISION PROFILES

1. Pedestrian-Involved Collisions
Near Transit Stops and Within
Disadvantaged Communities

2. DUI Overnight Collisions

3. Broadside Collisions at Signalized MajorMinor Intersections

4. Bicycle-Involved Collisions at
Intersections Without On-Street
Bicycle Facilities

5. Broadside Collisions Near Unsignalized
Intersections Involving Bicycles

6. Bicycle and Pedestrian-Involved
Collisions at Signalized
Intersections Downtown

7. Midblock Overnight Hit Object Collisions
19Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 402 -
Collision Profile 1
PedestrianInvolved
Collisions Near
Transit Stops
and Within
Disadvantaged
Communities
People living in Disadvantaged Communities
often face transportation barriers that limit
their access to jobs, services, and daily needs.

These barriers can also increase exposure to
traffic safety risks, particularly near transit
stops where walking activity is higher. This
profile highlights areas where there is a strong
relationship between pedestrian-related
collisions, proximity to transit stops, and
locations within disadvantaged communities.

Overall Collisions
379
4% of all injury collisions
46% of pedestrian-involved
collisions
KSI Collisions
88 12% of all KSI collisions
44% of all KSI pedestrian-involved
collisions
Key Trends

TOP CRASH TYPE
55% of crashes within this profile
involved pedestrians in a crosswalk

TOP KSI CRASH TYPE
44% of KSI crashes within this
profile involved pedestrians in a
crosswalk

TOP REPORTED VIOLATION

CATEGORY
49% of violations were related to
pedestrian right-of-way

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORY
40% of violations associated with
KSI collisions in this profile involved
pedestrian-related violations
20Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 403 -
21 9
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS

COLLISIONS AT MIDBLOCK
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
USDOT Disadvantaged
Communities
City Boundary
Medium
High
Low
Low High

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM STH ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I ST J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
99 132
Map 4 • Collision Profile 1
Safety in Modesto Today
21 #19..
- 404 -
Overall Collisions
483
5% of all injury collisions
4 1% of bicycle-involved collisions
9 1% of pedestrian-involved collisions
KSI Collisions
83 11% of all KSI collisions
1 1% of KSI bicycle-involved collisions
5 2% of KSI pedestrian-involved
collisions
Collision Profile 2
DUI Overnight
Collisions
Driving under the influence (DUI) is a
significant contributor to fatal and serious
injury crashes in Modesto, particularly
during overnight hours. This collision profile
highlights the role of impaired driving
in severe crashes and underscores the
importance of coordinated education,
enforcement, and policy strategies to
address these challenges.

Key Trends

TOP CRASH TYPE
33% of crashes in this profile
involved vehicles striking fixed objects
24% of KSI crashes in this profile
were rear-end collisions

TOP KSI CRASH TYPE
39% of KSI crashes in this profile
involved vehicles striking fixed objects
20% of KSI crashes in this profile
involved broadside collisions
22Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 405 -
21 9
108
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
LA

LOMA AVE
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS

COLLISIONS AT MIDBLOCK
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
Medium
High
Low
Low High

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST H ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I ST J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
99 108
Map 5 • Collision Profile 2
Safety in Modesto Today
23 #19..
- 406 -
Overall Collisions
1,218
12% of all injury collisions
76 12% of bicycle-involved collisions
4 <1% of pedestrian-involved
collisions
KSI Collisions
55 7% of all KSI collisions
5 6% of KSI bicycle-involved collisions
Key Trends

TOP VIOLATION CATEGORIES
55% of violations in this profile
involved Traffic Signals and Signs
21% of violations for this profile
involved Automobile Right of Way

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORIES
47% of violations associated with
KSI crashes involved Traffic Signals and
Signs
18% of violations for KSI Collisions in
this profile involved Automobile Right
of Way
Collision Profile 3
Broadside
Collisions at
Signalized
Major-Minor
Intersections
Broadside collisions are among the crash
types most likely to result in fatal or serious
injury due to the high levels of kinetic energy
involved. This profile highlights signalized
intersections where lower-volume roadways
intersect with major arterials or highways,
as well as locations with unprotected left
turns, where conflicts between vehicles
traveling at different speeds and angles
are most pronounced.
24Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 407 -
21 9
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS
Medium
High
Low
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM STH ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST
I ST
J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
99 108
Map 6 • Collision Profile 3
Safety in Modesto Today
25 #19..
- 408 -
Collision Profile 4
BicycleInvolved
Collisions at
Intersections
Without OnStreet Bicycle
Facilities
Many roadways in Modesto lack comfortable
and continuous on-street bicycle facilities.

This collision profile highlights locations
where people biking are exposed to higher
risk at intersections without designated
bicycle infrastructure, particularly where
vehicle turning movements and crossing
conflicts occur.

Overall Collisions
365
4% of all injury collisions
356
56% of bicycle-involved collisions
KSI Collisions
41 5% of all KSI collisions
41 52% of KSI bicycle-involved
collisions
Key Trends

TOP CRASH TYPE
60% of crashes in this profile
were Broadside collisions

TOP KSI CRASH TYPE
54% of KSI crashes in this profile
were Broadside collisions

TOP VIOLATION CATEGORY
29% of violations associated
with this profile were Wrong Side of
Road

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORY
29% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Traffic Signals and Signs
26Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 409 -
21 9
108
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS
Medium
High
Low
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
99 BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST H ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I ST J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
Map 7 • Collision Profile 4
Safety in Modesto Today
27 #19..
- 410 -
Collision Profile 5
Broadside
Collisions Near
Unsignalized
Intersections
Involving
Bicycles
People biking are particularly vulnerable
at intersections where they must interact
directly with motor vehicles. This collision
profile highlights unsignalized intersections,
where the absence of traffic control can
create uncertainty around right-of-way and
increase the risk of broadside collisions
involving bicycles.

Overall Collisions
222
2% of all injury collisions
222
34% of bicycle-involved collisions
KSI Collisions
26 3% of all KSI collisions
26 33% of KSI bicycle-involved
collisions
Key Trends

TOP VIOLATION CATEGORIES
34% of violations associated with
this profile involved Automobile Right
of Way
31% of violations associated
with this profile involved Wrong
Side of Road

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORY
42% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Automobile Right of Way
23% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Traffic Signals and Signs
28Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 411 -
21 9
108
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/24/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS
Medium
High
Low
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
99 BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST H ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I STJ ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
108
Map 8 • Collision Profile 5
Safety in Modesto Today
29 #19..
- 412 -
Collision Profile 6
Bicycle and
PedestrianInvolved
Collisions at
Signalized
Intersections
Downtown
This profile highlights bicycle- and pedestrianinvolved crashes at signalized intersections in Downtown. These locations tend to
concentrate higher volumes of people
walking, biking, and driving, increasing the
frequency of interactions and potential
conflicts. While signals provide formal traffic
control, complex movements and high activity
levels can elevate risk for vulnerable road
users when conflicts occur.

Overall Collisions
131
1% of all injury collisions
54 8% of bicycle-involved collisions
77 9% of pedestrian-involved collisions
KSI Collisions
11 1% of all KSI collisions
3 4% of KSI bicycle-involved collisions
8 4% of KSI pedestrian-involved
collisions
Key Trends

TOP CRASH TYPE
53% of crashes associated with this
profile involved Vehicle–Pedestrian
conflicts

TOP KSI CRASH TYPE
64% of KSI crashes associated with
this profile involved Vehicle–Pedestrian
conflicts

TOP VIOLATION CATEGORY
31% of violations associated with this
profile involved Pedestrian Right of Way

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORY
36% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Pedestrian Right of Way
30Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 413 -
108
132 99
S 9TH
NEEDHAM STH ST S 7TH ST G ST

SIERRA DR

MAZE BLVD
6TH ST 5TH ST
13TH ST

YOSEMITE BLVD

KANSAS AVE
L ST
SUTTER

CALIFORNIA AVE
14TH ST
7TH ST

VIRGINIA AVE

DOWNEY AVE D ST
K ST

S MARTIN LUTHER
I ST
1ST ST
J ST

SCENIC DR
VINE ST N 9TH ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
17TH ST

COLLEG E AVE

PARADISE AVE

CHICAGO AVE
N
E
E
D
H
AM
O
PAS

BURNEY ST

TULLY RD

MC HENRY AVE

BODEM ST

LA LOMA AVE

TUOLUMNE BLVNEECE DR

ROSELAWN AVE

S MADISON ST

S WASHINGTON ST

S EMERALD AVE N EMERALD AVE
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 11/25/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend

COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS
Medium
High
Low
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary
Map 9 • Collision Profile 6
Safety in Modesto Today
31 #19..
- 414 -
Collision Profile 7
Midblock
Overnight
Hit Object
Collisions
These collisions often occur on roadways with
limited lighting, higher operating speeds, and
fewer visual cues, increasing the likelihood
that drivers fail to detect fixed objects or
roadway edges in time to react. Variability
in streetlighting coverage and effectiveness
can further contribute to elevated risk during
nighttime conditions.

Overall Collisions
74 1% of all injury collisions
KSI Collisions
11 1% of all KSI collisions
Key Trends

TOP VIOLATION CATEGORY
41%
of violations associated with this profile
involved Driving Under the Influence of
Alcohol or Drugs
32%
of violations associated with this profile
involved Improper Turning

TOP KSI VIOLATION CATEGORY
36% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol
or Drugs
36% of violations associated with
KSI crashes in this profile involved
Unsafe Speed
32Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 415 -
21 9
108
108
132
132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

F NI E AVE

SUTTER AVE

OAKDALE RD EL VISTA AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR
LA

LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE
W
HATC
H
RD W
U
N
I
O
N
AVE
D
R
Y C
R
E
E
K
DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE
VI
N
TAG
E
DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE
P
E
N
N
Y
L
N

YOSEMITE BLVD
D ST

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST
SCENIC
DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE

ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD
E
B
R
I
G
GS
M
O
R
E AVE
P
E
LA
N
D
A
L
E
AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 12/4/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Legend
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary

COLLISIONS AT MIDBLOCK
Low Medium High
99 BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST H ST G ST
SIERRA DR 6TH ST 5TH ST L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST

I ST J ST

VINE ST
B ST
10TH ST 11TH ST 12TH ST
9TH ST
Map 10 • Collision Profile 7
Safety in Modesto Today
33 #19..
- 416 -
What Is
Systemic Safety?
Focuses on patterns and
risk factors, not just collision
hot spots
Uses roadway features and
behavior trends to predict risk
Supports proactive
investments that aim to prevent
future crashes
Proactive Risk Assessment
To complement historical crash data, a
systemic risk analysis was developed that
identifies corridors where contextual factors,
such as lane count, land use, and crossing
spacing, create elevated risk even without a
collision history. This analysis evaluated risk for
people walking, biking, and driving. Findings
look beyond where collisions have occurred
to highlight where collisions are likely to
happen in the future based on roadway
characteristics and surrounding conditions.

They reinforce the need for proactive safety
strategies that improve conditions across
the whole system to reduce future collisions.

Separate risk indices were created for
collisions involving motor vehicles, bicycles,
and pedestrians, each with significant areas
of overlap, particularly along roadways with
more lanes, higher traffic volumes, signalized
intersections with major roads, and roadways
in commercial areas. As an example, Map
11 shows the locations where motor vehicle
collision risk is elevated citywide.

Key findings from this analysis include:
Multi-lane commercial and mixed-use
corridors such as Briggsmore Avenue,
McHenry Avenue, and Yosemite
Boulevard exhibit elevated risk per mile.
For bicyclists and pedestrians, moderate
speed zones (30 to 35 MPH) carry
disproportionate risk when compared
to roadways with higher posted speed
limits (+40 MPH), possibly due to
increased walking/biking volumes and
incomplete facilities.
In contrast, roadways with higher speed
limits (+40 MPH) were associated with
higher risk for motor vehicle collisions.
Roadways with moderate crossing
spacing were associated with greater risk
for bicyclists and pedestrians than those
with lower or higher crossing spacing.
Roadways without separated bike lanes
or sidewalks were associated with a
higher risk for bicyclists.
Signalized intersections between
major roads are consistent hot spots for
collisions across all modes.8
This proactive risk assessment outlines
locations and roadway characteristics where
design improvements or operational changes
have the potential to reduce collision risk and
severity , benefiting all roadway users. For
more information, including individual risk
trends and tabulations for pedestrian, bicycle,
and motor vehicle collisions, refer to Appendix
C: Risk Factor Analysis Memorandum.
8 A principal arterial typically has six lanes. City of Modesto. 2019. Modesto General Plan, Chapter V,
Transportation. https://www.modestogov.com/
DocumentCenter/View/15012/GPA-10-001-DOCChapter-V-3-6-19-PDF 34Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 417 -
219
108
108
132 132
99 TULLY RD

COLLEGE AVE

FINE AVE

SUTTER AVE
O

AKDALE RD EL VISTA
AVE

FLOYD AVE

PRESCOTT RD

COFFEE RD

DALE RD
G ST

WOODLAND AVE

SNYDER AVE

MERLE AVE

HILLGLEN AVE

E RUMBLE RD

WYLIE DR

LA LOMA AVE

CONANT AVE

W HATCH RD

W UNION AVE

DRY CREEK DR

ENCINA AVE

KODIAK DR

MABLE AVE

VINTAGE DR

TIOGA DR

V RI G NI AI AVE

PENNY LN

YOSEMITE BLVD

N EECE DR
N 9TH ST

SCENIC DR

BANGS AVE

SYLVAN AVE ROSELLE AVE

BLUE GUM AVE

SISK RD

CLAUS RD

E BRIGGSMORE AVE

PELANDALE AVE

S CARPENTER RD

S EMERALD AVE

E ORANGEBURG AVE

MITCHELL RD

MORGAN RD

CROWS LANDING RD
Data provided by the City of Modesto. Date saved: 12/4/2025. 0 0.5 1 MILES
Motor Vehicle
Collision Risk Index
Amtrak
Railroad
Areas of Persistent Poverty
City Boundary

RISK SCORE
0 - 1 2 - 4 5 - 6
7 - 8 9 - 15

BURNEY ST

NEEDHAM ST
H ST
G ST

SIERRA DR
5TH ST
L ST
14TH ST
7TH ST
D ST
K ST
I ST
J ST

VINE ST B ST
10TH ST
11TH ST
Map 11 • Motor Vehicle Collision Risk Index
Safety in Modesto Today
35 #19..
- 418 -
Everyone
Deserves
to Be Safe
The burden of traffic collisions is not shared
equally across Modesto. The High Injury
Network, collision profiles, and the proactive
risk assessment all point to the same
conclusion: neighborhoods designated as
disadvantaged experience a disproportionate
share of the city’s transportation safety
challenges. These analyses show overlap with
neighborhoods with higher concentrations
of low-income residents, greater financial
burdens, and higher exposure to
environmental hazard. Additionally, these
communities are more likely to live near
corridors with high concentrations of severe
crashes, more frequent collision hotspots,
and roadway conditions that elevate risk,
such as wide roads, limited crossings, and
incomplete pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

These patterns underscore the importance
of equitable investment. By prioritizing
historically underinvested areas and
vulnerable users, Modesto can strive to deliver
safer streets for the benefit of every resident.

Elevated Risk in
Disadvantaged Communities
When the HINs are compared with SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities 9 and Areas of Persistent Poverty 10 datasets, the results tell a clear story:
9 The SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities dataset identifies census tracts designated as disadvantaged under California Senate Bill 535 to ensure that state climate-related investments are targeted to communities most burdened by pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability. 10 The Areas of Persistent Poverty dataset identifies counties in the United States where 20% or more of the population has lived in poverty over the last 30 years, providing a framework to guide federal agency investment to persistently low-income communities.

Table 1 • HIN Overlap with Equity Priority Areas
High Injury
Network Category
% of HIN in
SB 535
Disadvantaged
Communities only
% of HIN in
Areas of Persistent
Poverty only
% of HIN in both SB
535 Disadvantaged
Communities and
Areas of Persistent
Poverty
HIN – All Collisions
88% 75% 71%
HIN – Pedestrian
Collision
89% 72% 68%
HIN – Bicycle Collision
92% 77% 74%
36Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 419 -
These findings show that the residents most
at risk of serious injury or death are often
those experiencing poverty, who are also
typically have the fewest transportation
options and the greatest reliance on walking,
biking, and transit.

Schools are also close to many of these corridors.
20% of the All Collisions HIN lies within
a quarter mile of a school.
22% of the Bicycle HIN and nearly 29%
of the Pedestrian HIN are also within a
quarter mile of schools.

Together, these statistics reinforce the
foundation of Modesto’s Safe Streets and
Roads for All effort.

No loss of life is acceptable,
and everyone, regardless of
income, age, or neighborhood,
deserves to move safely
through the city.
37Safety in Modesto Today
#19..
- 420 -
What You Told Us
03 #19..
- 421 -
Safety Task Force
We rely on community engagement,
communication, and collaboration to
inform safety improvements in Modesto.

The Safety Task Force was created to guide
the Safe Streets and Roads for All planning
process and integrate local priorities and
experiences into the plan. The Safety
Task Force brought together agencies,
schools, health professionals, advocacy
organizations, and community partners
who share the goal of creating safer streets
for everyone.

This Safety Action Plan would not have
been possible without the input and
dedication of Safety Task Force members
representing the following organizations:
City of Modesto
Empire Union School District
Love to Ride
Modesto City Schools
Modesto Junior College
Safe Kids Stanislaus
Stanislaus Council of Governments
Stanislaus County Health Services
Agency
Stanislaus Union School District
Sutter Health
Sylvan Union School District
Visually Impaired Persons Support
Over four working meetings held between
spring 2024 and summer 2025, the Safety
Task Force shaped the plan’s focus areas,
helped identify priority corridors, and
reviewed strategies for improving safety
across Modesto’s transportation network.

Members also promoted outreach events
and shared input on the draft Safety
Countermeasure Toolbox and High Injury
Network (HIN) maps, working to identify
community needs to be represented in the
plan’s technical findings.

Safety Task Force members meet for their
third working session at Modesto City Hall,
March 2025.

Top Requests
from Residents
Slower speeds in neighborhoods
Safer crossings for students
More visible bike lanes
Better lighting at intersections
Continued community involvement
Modesto’s Safety Action Plan was shaped by
the voices of the community. Over the course
of a year, hundreds of residents, students,
and local partners shared their experiences
and ideas for making city streets safer and
more comfortable for everyone. From pop-up
events at schools and parks to online surveys
and virtual workshops, the City listened to
people across all six council districts. These
conversations revealed clear priorities,
including slower speeds, safer crossings, and
better connections for walking and biking.

Additional details about community input
and participation outcomes are available in
Appendix D: Public Engagement Summary
Memorandum.
39What You Told Us
#19..
- 422 -
Listening to the Voice
of the Community
Summary
of Activities
From fall 2024 through winter 2025, the City
of Modesto invited residents to share their
experiences, concerns, and ideas about traffic
safety. Through a mix of workshops, pop-up
events, surveys, and online tools, community
members helped shape the plan’s direction
and identified where safety improvements are
most needed.

Engagement activities were held in all six
council districts and reached a broad cross
section of the community, including families,
students, seniors, and people who rely on
walking, biking, and transit.

Phases of Engagement
PHASE 1: UNDERSTANDING
SAFETY NEEDS (FALL 2024)
Introduced the project to the public, gathered
input on safety concerns, and collected stories
about how people move through Modesto.

Outreach included six pop-up events, an
online survey, and the first virtual workshop.

PHASE 2: SHARING SOLUTIONS
(SUMMER 2025)
Presented draft corridor improvements,
potential programs, and citywide strategies
for feedback. Events included six additional
pop-ups and a second virtual workshop with
breakout discussions and polls.

PHASE 3: REVIEWING THE DRAFT
PLAN (FALL–WINTER 2025)
Shared the draft Safety Action Plan with
the Safety Task Force and other stakeholder
groups for review and comment.

Across all phases, participation was strong:
more than 600 Modesto residents engaged in
person, online, or through partner-led events.

Materials were translated into Spanish, and
bilingual staff and interpreters supported
each engagement activity.
40What You Told Us
#19..
- 423 -
Engagement
Highlights

ENGAGEMENT BY

THE NUMBERS
Two pop-up events in each of
the six council districts (12 total)
Two virtual workshops
with 24 total participants
68 comments and 130 “likes/
dislikes” submitted through
the online input map
Over 350 residents engaged
at Love Modesto 2025 event
1,200+ total interactions
across all platforms
What we Heard
What Modestans are Saying
Modesto residents were clear: people want safer, calmer streets and more comfortable ways to get around. Through hundreds of conversations, surveys, and comments, community members described daily experiences on city streets and shared ideas for change. “I want my adult child
to be able to get around
independently, but crossing
major streets feels too
dangerous. Drivers run red
lights, intersections are wide,
and biking or walking often
feels unsafe.”
“Everyone deserves to move
through the city without fear,
and we need safer crossings,
better protection for
people biking, and stronger
enforcement to make
that possible.”
“Some crossings make
people on bikes wait far
too long, even when no
cars are coming. It feels
uncomfortable and unsafe
to sit exposed in the roadway
while drivers grow impatient.”
Community members discuss safety
concerns and potential countermeasures
during a pop-up event near the Virginia
Corridor Trail and Rumble Road,
Spring 2025
41What You Told Us
#19..
- 424 -
Key Themes
Speeding and aggressive driving
are top concerns citywide, particularly
on streets near schools and in residential
areas.
Walking and biking feel unsafe
along corridors such as College Avenue,
Coffee Road, Yosemite Boulevard,
Sylvan Avenue, and Standiford Avenue.
Crosswalk visibility and lighting
need improvement, especially in
areas with high pedestrian activity or
limited streetlights.
Uneven sidewalks or faded markings,
and other maintenance and accessibility
issues discourage people from walking
and biking.
Residents expressed interest in
improving driver behavior and
supported education and awareness
efforts to make streets safer.

Pop-Up Notes
Participants stated that it is unsafe to
walk or bike to their school, including
Modesto High School and James
Marshall Elementary School.
(Source: South Modesto Pop-Up)
Speeding and ignoring traffic controls
was another concern for pedestrian
safety at intersections.
(Source: McKinney Colony Park Pop-Up)
Participants highlighted destinations
they would like to bike or walk to but are
unable to due to the lack of connectivity
and comfort of existing facilities.
(Source: South Modesto Pop-Up)
At pop-up events such as Love Modesto,
Enochs High School Open House, and
Modesto Certified Farmers Market,
participants highlighted how traffic
safety connects to neighborhood
livability and access to daily needs.
42What You Told Us
#19..
- 425 -
Community Priorities
Throughout all engagement activities, residents identified clear priorities for future investments.

They also expressed support for the following
actions to enable safe and comfortable
streets:
Adding traffic calming features such
as speed humps, roundabouts, and
curb extensions.
Improving street lighting and
crosswalk visibility.
Expanding bike lanes and safe routes
to schools and parks.
Addressing speeding and red
light running through education
and enforcement.
Designing streets that prioritize safety
over speed.
Implementing Complete Streets designs
that serve all modes of travel.
Improving driver education and
awareness around traffic safety.
Building safer access to transit for people
of all ages and abilities.

Additional details about Safety Action
Plan community input and participation
outcomes are available in Appendix D: Public
Engagement Summary Memorandum.

An online public input map was used to collect public feedback on existing conditions from November 14th, 2024 through January 6th, 2025 and draft recommendations from September 1st, 2025 through September 18th, 2025. 43What You Told Us
#19..
- 426 -
Looking
Ahead
Community engagement will remain at
the heart of Modesto’s Safety Action Plan
implementation. The partnerships built
through this process, between the City,
schools, health agencies, community
organizations, and residents, will continue as
Modesto moves from planning to action.

Regular updates, public events, and
collaboration with local organizations will
develop a vision for safer streets that is guided
by the people who use them every day.
44What You Told Us
#19..
- 427 -
Safe Street Strategies
04 #19..
- 428 -
A Systems Approach
To Safety
A systems approach recognizes that serious crashes are influenced by many layers of the transportation environment. By looking beyond individual collisions and examining the broader context, we can understand how other factors contribute to risk. These insights help identify changes that have the greatest potential to prevent future harm, whether applicable to individual knowledge, culture, or physical changes and policy.

Engineering & Policy
Collaboration & Culture ShifCo
t
llaboration & Culture Shift
nI dividual Knowledge & Skills
46Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 429 -
Our Guiding
Principles
The following guiding principles
were adapted using Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) Safe System
language. These guiding principles
introduce a paradigm shift in how we
think about safety on Modesto’s streets.

Death and severe injuries are unacceptable. Every life lost on Modesto’s streets is one too many. The City is committed to eliminating crashes that cause death or lasting harm so that everyone can travel without fear. The goal is simple: no one should have to risk their life to get where they need to go.

Everyone deserves to be safe. Serious crashes do not impact all parts of the community equally. Many occur in disadvantaged areas and near schools.

Safety strategies should focus on where risk and need are greatest.

Humans make mistakes. We know humans make mistakes, but one mistake should not end a life. Streets should be designed to forgive human error through lower speeds, better visibility, and safer intersections.

Humans are vulnerable. Our bodies cannot withstand the force of fast moving vehicles. Streets that slow traffic and separate people from danger prioritize human life and community health.

Responsibility is shared. Everyone who lives in, works in, and visits Modesto plays a role in safety. The City, its partners, and the public must work together to create lasting change.

Safety is proactive. Creating safe streets requires that we identify and mitigate risks proactively. Using data to identify dangerous conditions, we can create safer streets before a collision occurs.

Redundancy is crucial. Much like how humans make mistakes, it’s inevitable that parts of the system will fail. Under Vision Zero, when one part fails, the other parts must still protect people. Speed management, street design, and safe infrastructure together form a system that keeps everyone safe. 47Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 430 -
Policy and
Programmatic Strategies
11 The policy and program gap assessment is provided in Appendix E: Policy and Program Benchmarking Assessment Memorandum.

Insights from safety analyses, community
input, a policy and program gap assessment,
and guidance from the City of Modesto
and the Safety Task Force informed the
development of the non-infrastructure
recommendations.11 These recommendations
advance holistic solutions to the city’s
transportation safety challenges.

For organization, this Safety Action Plan’s
policy and process recommendations are
grouped under the objectives of the Safe
System Approach:

In support of these objectives sits a Safe
Planning and Culture ethos, which serves
as the foundation for all safety efforts in
Modesto. This overarching objective guides
how the City sets policies, aligns processes,
evaluates outcomes, and collaborates with
community partners.

The recommendations in this section focus
on non-infrastructure strategies, such as
policy updates, improved processes, and
stronger coordination among partners.

Though organized as such, the effects of these
recommendations are not limited to a single
Safe System objective. Each contributes to
the overall goal of reducing deaths and
serious injuries across Modesto’s
transportation network.

Safe Planning and Culture
Safe Users
Safe Roadways
Safe Vehicles
Safe Speeds
Post-Crash Care
48Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 431 -
Safe Planning and Culture:

An effective planning process
and a strong culture of safety
should guide all transportation
decisions in Modesto.

SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes
STRATEGY SPC-1: Establish strong leadership and commitment to roadway safety within City Government Action Items SPC-1a. Leaders publicly commit
to a “Zero” goal for traffic
fatalities and serious injuries
within a specific time frame,
and exhibit buy-in for the Safe
System Approach through
media, public events, and
support for related policies
and programs.

Short
Modesto City
Council;
City of Modesto
- Media &
Communications
Relations
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Provide regular public
updates on Safe System
efforts and progress through
the City’s communication
platforms, including social
media, e-newsletters, and
public events.
-
Table 2 • Safe Planning and Culture Recommendations
A culture of safety is a self-reinforcing
mechanism that enables system
safety change.

By strengthening planning and leadership practices, collecting and using safety data to guide targeted improvements, and establishing a clear commitment from City leadership to achieve zero deaths and serious injuries, Modesto can build the momentum needed to create safer streets for everyone.

Title of Chapter 53
How to Read the
Recommendations
The following sections present the recommendations organized by the Safe System Approach objectives. The recommendations are organized within tables that include the following details:

Safe System Objective
Safe Users, Safe Roadways,
Safe Vehicles, Safe Speeds,
Post-Crash Care, and Safe
Planning and Culture.

Timeline
How far in the future the
action should take place.

Action Items
More detailed information
for the key steps needed to
achieve the strategy.

Strategy
Broad recommendation
directly related to safety
analysis, crash profiles,
community input, or policy/
program gap assessment.

Role and Responsibility
(Lead Agency)
Who should lead the action
item and what partners are
critical to success.

Implementation Needs
Identifies if the action item will require funding, additional staff capacity, relationship building with external
partners, or policy legislation in order to advance.

Performance Target
Ways Modesto will monitor
implementation and provide
updates on progress.

Safe Street Strategies
49 #19..
- 432 -
Safe Planning and Culture:

An effective planning process
and a strong culture of safety
should guide all transportation
decisions in Modesto.

SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes STRATEGY SPC-1: Establish strong leadership and commitment to roadway safety within City Government Action Items SPC-1a. Leaders publicly commit
to a goal to reduce traffic
fatalities and serious injuries
by half by 2045 with a goal of
eventually reaching “zero,” and
exhibit buy-in for Vision Zero
principles through media, public
events, and support for related
policies and programs.

Safe Street Strategies
50 #19..
- 433 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes Action Items
SPC-1b. Consider providing
information to Modesto staff,
directors, elected officials, and
community stakeholders on the
Safe System approach and Vision
Zero principles.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
-
In coordination with Public
Relations, develop a brief City
of Modesto staff newsletter
focused on the Safety Action
Plan, including an overview of
SS4A, how the Safety Action
Plan addresses traffic fatalities
and serious injuries, and the
roles and responsibilities of
Modesto staff.
- - -
SPC-1c. Continue to meet with
the Modesto Safe Streets for
All Safety Task Force and other
agencies to monitor, prioritize,
and implement the strategies.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design
Various
Conduct periodic meetings to
monitor progress and assign
responsibilities. Consider
inviting additional agency
representatives as appropriate.
- -
STRATEGY SPC-2: Continuously collect, analyze, and apply data to support data-driven roadway safety improvements Action Items SPC-2a. Collect pedestrian and
bicyclist volumes periodically
with intersection counts and
maintain a GIS database of
counts.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
– Information
Technology
Department
Maintain an up-to-date GIS
database with pedestrian
and bicyclist volume data by
ensuring key intersections along
priority corridors have counts
collected and recorded annually.
-
51Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 434 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes Action Items
SPC-2b. Maintain a GIS inventory
and regularly update crash and
roadway data to help ensure
accuracy, including information
on missing sidewalks, bikeways,
and intersection controls.

Incorporate these updates when
revising planning documents.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
– Information
Technology
Department
Maintaining and updating the
GIS inventory in snapshots
with individual and recurring
studies, including the
potential purchase of software
to support crash analysis and
safety evaluation.
-
SPC-2c. Consider using
innovative data collection and
analysis approaches, such
as crowdsourcing or video
detection data, to identify
emphasis areas related to near
misses or other suspected
safety issues.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
-
Identify emphasis areas using
innovative data collection
methods and integrate
findings into individual and
recurring studies.
-
STRATEGY SPC-3: Pursue funding strategies to support roadway safety projects Action Items SPC-3a. Consider steps
to institutionalize safety
considerations in all project types
including potential funding of
projects through operations and
maintenance efforts (such as
repaving projects through the
Capital Improvement Program
[CIP] and slurry seal).

Mid-Long
City of Modesto -
Public Works
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Evaluate all streets during
pavement resurfacing
to determine if safety
countermeasures can be
provided when the striping is
reapplied. Conduct an annual
review of the City's CIP list
to promote the inclusion of
recommended safety projects
for new and existing facilities.
-
52Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 435 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes SPC-3b. Continue utilizing
the prioritization framework
developed in the Safety Action
Plan for future studies to
evaluate projects for funding
based on fatal and serious injury
crash reduction opportunities,
especially for vulnerable
road users.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
-
Use the Safety Action Plan
prioritization framework
to evaluate future funding
decisions. Periodically review
the framework to assess its
effectiveness and update it as
needed.
- -
STRATEGY SPC-4: Ensure new developments incorporate roadway safety strategies and align with the City’s roadway safety goals Action Items SPC-4a. Consider conducting
traffic safety impact assessments
of new developments to identify
mitigation and cost sharing
opportunities.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Short-term:

New developments can
undergo a safety impact
assessment to identify
mitigation and cost-sharing
opportunities.

Medium-term:

Explore assignment of staff
or committee responsibilities
to oversee and integrate traffic
safety impact assessments
into the development
review process.
-
53Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 436 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes SPC-4b. During the
development review process,
evaluate whether circulation
to, from, and within the
development along with
recommended Transportation
Demand Management (TDM)
measures align with safety best
practices and support active
transportation modes.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Short-term: Continue City's
current practice of having
various City departments
review new developments for
alignment with the General
Plan and Standards.

Medium-term: Oversee the
review and integration of
circulation and TDM measures
for new development.
-
STRATEGY SPC-5: Prioritize roadway safety in underserved populations and communities to advance equity Action Items SPC-5a. Continue prioritizing
roadway safety in underserved
communities identified in the
Safety Action Plan and other
previous studies, to enable safety
improvements that promote
equity once implemented.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Equity
Commission
Continue to evaluate
disadvantaged neighborhoods
citywide when prioritizing
roadway safety projects, with
consideration of equitable
distribution across and within
Council Districts.
-
SPC-5b. Continue to engage
populations that are traditionally
underserved to help inform
safety priorities, identify potential
projects, and provide input into
future studies.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design;
City of Modesto
– Media &
Community
Relations; City
of Modesto
- Equity
Commission
Engage underserved
populations in future studies
to inform safety priorities.

Periodically review federal or
state criteria for identifying
underserved communities
(e.g., poverty thresholds)
and adjust engagement
approaches as needed to best
reach priority populations.
- -
54Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 437 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes Action Items
SPC-5c. Consider establishing
a Roadway Safety Community
Committee to help oversee
decision-making for safety
projects, develop relationships,
and build trust with
community leaders in
underserved communities.

Long
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of
Modesto
– Media &
Community
Relations
Establish a line of
communication with
community leaders by
formalizing a Roadway
Safety Community
Committee. The
committee can meet
periodically, evaluate
progress toward
implementation of
the Safety Action
Plan, leverage their
communication channels,
and discuss safety
concerns.
-
STRATEGY SPC-6: Integrating Land Use Planning and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) to Reduce Exposure and Support Mode Shift Action Items SPC-6a. Consider updates to the
TDM strategies in the Downtown
Master Plan to reduce vehicle trips
and increase multimodal travel. Mid-Long
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development

1. Continue implementing
TDM strategies in the Modesto
Downtown Master Plan that
encourage TDM plans at new
developments greater than
25,000 square feet in size.

2. Reevaluate the TDM plans to
include tangible actions and
policies to create opportunities
to increase transit.
- -
55Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 438 -
SPC: Safe Planning And Culture
Set up effective planning process
for roadway safety and promote a
culture of safety.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes Action Items
SPC-6b. Evaluate the General
Plan for opportunities to expand
higher-density land use near
major transit corridors to support
mode shift.

Mid-Long
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
-
Evaluate and update the
General Plan to expand
opportunities for rezoning
underutilized areas to support
mixed-use, transit-oriented
development (TOD), and
higher-density housing near
major transit corridors to
support mode shift.
- -
SPC-6c. Explore steps to improve
the jobs-housing balance to
reduce long commutes. Mid-Long
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
-

1. Encourage economic
development policies that
incentivize job creation near
existing housing centers.

2. Promote affordable housing
availability in areas with
high employment.
- -
SPC-6d. Build on Modesto’s
existing education and
encouragement efforts by
supporting additional incentives,
outreach, and small-scale
programs that make it easier
and more appealing for
residents to choose alternatives
to driving alone.

Short
Stanislaus Regional
Transit Authority -

1. Increase the number of
Modesto residents completing
SRTA’s travel-training program,
focusing on both choice riders
and mobility-limited riders.

2. Leverage fare-free promotions
to convert new riders into
regular transit users
- -
56Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 439 -
Safe Users: Address the safety
of all road users, including
those who walk, bike, roll,
drive, ride transit, and travel
by other modes.

Table 3 • Safe Users Recommendations
People living, working, or traveling in
Modesto should be safe walking, biking,
rolling, taking transit, or driving.

The Safe System Approach is focused on the safety of all road users.

This is an important component of many strategies listed in this plan, even those outside the Safe Users objective. Recommendations for safe users include continuing public education campaigns around traffic safety, using demonstration projects to raise awareness of new designs, and developing enforcement and education pilots.

SU: SAFE USERS
Address the safety of all road users,
including those who walk, bike, roll,
drive, ride transit, and travel by
other modes.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SU-1: Educate all roadway users Action Items
SU-1a. Continue to offer traffic
safety communication/education
campaigns that build on the
success of the “Let Kids Cross”
campaign, with a focus on the
behaviors and target audiences
most linked to death and
serious injuries.

Short
City of Modesto
- Media &
Communications
Relations; City
of Modesto -
Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
Police Department
Review and update education/
communication campaign
materials periodically to support
their ability to effectively
address the primary factors
contributing to fatal and serious
injury crashes.
-
Safe Street Strategies
57 #19..
- 440 -
SU: SAFE USERS
Address the safety of all road users,
including those who walk, bike, roll,
drive, ride transit, and travel by
other modes.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Media &
Communications
Relations
Periodically collaborate
with community-based
organizations and advocacy
groups, engaging at least
quarterly to coordinate events
that promote safe road
user education.
- -
SU-1c. Consider using safety
demonstration projects to raise
awareness of new designs,
encourage support among
stakeholders for safety projects
requiring capacity trade-offs, and
solicit feedback from the public.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Develop a structured public
engagement strategy for
demonstration projects to
ensure clear communication
and effective community
involvement.

Continue to use demonstration
projects in individual and
recurring studies to raise
awareness of new designs
leveraging the guidance
provided in the Modesto
Safety Demonstration Guide
(Appendix L).
-
58Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 441 -
SU: SAFE USERS
Address the safety of all road users,
including those who walk, bike, roll,
drive, ride transit, and travel by
other modes.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SU-1d. Explore formation
of strong partnerships with
Modesto’s school districts to
collaboratively design and
implement a Safe Routes to
School program that improves
student safety, encourages
walking and biking, and
coordinates education,
enforcement, and infrastructure
improvements.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Media &
Communications
Relations; City
of Modesto -
Transportation
Engineering &
Design
Sylvan Union
Elementary School
District; Empire
Union School
District; Stanislaus
Union Elementary
School District;
Paradise Elementary
School District;
Shiloh Elementary
School District;
Modesto City School
District
Short-term: establish
partnerships with Modesto
school districts and launch
Safe Routes to School
programming at pilot
campuses.

Mid-term: expand Safe
Routes to School initiatives to
additional Modesto K-8 schools
and achieve measurable
increases in walking and biking
rates along with reductions in
school-area traffic conflicts.

STRATEGY SU-2: Revisit approach to traffic enforcement Action Items SU-2a. Evaluate potential to
reallocate enforcement activities
to target those behaviors
and locations most strongly
associated with death and
serious injury.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
Police Department -
Maintain ongoing efforts
to review injury trends on
a weekly basis and adjust
enforcement strategies
accordingly to address
emerging patterns and
high-priority areas.
- - -
59Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 442 -
SU: SAFE USERS
Address the safety of all road users,
including those who walk, bike, roll,
drive, ride transit, and travel by
other modes.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SU-2b. Evaluate steps to mitigate
potential disproportionate
impact of enforcement on
disadvantaged populations. Short
City of Modesto
Police Department
City of Modesto -
Equity Commission
Study potential for
disproportionate traffic safety
enforcement and surveillance
on those in disadvantaged
areas, supporting equitable
distribution and addressing
identified disparities.
- -
SU-2c. Consider developing
a pilot program that pairs
enforcement with education. Mid
City of Modesto
Police Department -

1. Utilize speed cameras
or radar feedback signs
equipped with license plate
recognition (LPR) to identify
offenders and issue warnings
along with educational
materials about the dangers of
speeding.

2. Assess the program’s
effectiveness by tracking
compliance rates, reductions
in repeat offenses, and
changes in speeding behavior
every six months.
-
60Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 443 -
Safe Roadways: Humans are not
perfect, and roadways should be
designed with that in mind.

Table 4 • Safe Roadways Recommendations
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SR-1: Prioritize safety improvements on high injury streets and intersections to reduce and avoid collisions Action Items SR-1a. Prioritize and implement
safety treatments along priority
corridors and the HIN using
treatments that reduce conflicts,
calm speeds, and improve
visibility, such as protected
signals, No Right Turn On
Red, clear zones, and added
separation for people walking
and biking.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Short-term: Implement
safety treatments on priority
corridors as part of ongoing
programmed projects.

Medium-term: Identify
funding and implement
recommended safety projects
on high priority corridors.
-
Designing and retrofitting roadways to
accommodate human mistakes can
reduce the risk of severe crashes when
crashes inevitably occur.

This includes creating safer crossings, adding space between people walking or biking and traffic, slowing vehicle speeds, improving lighting, and using design features that help alert travelers to hazards.

Safe Street Strategies
61 #19..
- 444 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SR-1b. Take steps to complete
infrastructure connectivity
for pedestrians and bicyclists
by closing sidewalk gaps and
enhancing network continuity.

Prioritize providing separation
where needed based on
exposure, crash history, and
characteristics of the roadway
and adjacent land use associated
with higher use.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Public Works
Short-term: Close sidewalk
gaps and enhance network
continuity on areas where
adjacent land use has higher
levels of use as part of ongoing
programmed projects.

Medium-term: Identify
funding and implement
infrastructure connectivity for
pedestrians and bicyclists.
-
SR-1c. Take steps to improve
safe access to transit by auditing
bus stops along high frequency
transit routes with high
pedestrian crash rates to identify
both quick-build strategies
and long-term improvements
needed.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design
The Stanislaus
Regional Transit
Authority
Short-term: Identify the top
25 bus stops with the highest
ridership and pedestrian crash
rates; Evaluate the top 25
bus stop locations to identify
challenges and safety trends
leveraging information from
the collision profiles.

Medium-term: Implement
improvements at the top
25 bus stops including bus
stop relocations, enhanced
pedestrian crossings,
improved lighting, etc.
-
62Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 445 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SR-1d. Explore diversification of
funding sources to enable longterm funding availability and maximize efficient use of existing
funding opportunities.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design; City
of Modesto
- Public Works
-
Short-term: Identify existing
funding sources where safety
improvements can be carved
out and prioritized for use
along the HIN.

Medium-term: Dedicate new
funding streams to fund
Safety Action Plan projects.
-
SR-1e. Consider prioritizing
maintenance funding toward
HIN corridors and other priority
corridors by integrating
improvements as a part of
ongoing maintenance activities,
such as roadway re-striping,
sidewalk repair, streetlight repair,
and increased street sweeping.

Short-Mid
City of Modest
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Short-term: Identify ways
to implement safety
improvements in conjunction
with maintenance projects.

Medium-term: Implement
maintenance improvements
along safety priority corridors,
prioritizing sidewalk repair
and bikeway sweeping/
maintenance.
-
SR-1f. Evaluate establishment
of a new reconstruction and
resurfacing prioritization process
that goes beyond Pavement
Conditions Index (PCI) to include
safety considerations. Build off
lessons learned from previous
efforts to broaden this approach,
such as improving internal
communications around the
process.

Mid
City of Modest
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Short-term: Outline a
transparent, data driven
prioritization approach
with greater weight for
safety considerations.

Medium-term: Work with
internal City departments,
focusing on communication,
to develop a process
for implementation.
- - -
63Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 446 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SR-1g. Explore integration
of safety improvements into
every roadway resurfacing
or reconstruction project to
enhance multimodal safety and
accessibility.

Mid
City of Modesto -
Public Works
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Establish a Complete
Streets Policy requiring
Modesto to incorporate
safety enhancements for all
transportation modes in the
planning, design, construction,
operation, and maintenance of
projects within or adjacent to
the public right-of-way.
- -
SR-1h. Evaluate adding staff
capacity specifically for
implementing safety work, such
as a Roadway Safety Coordinator. Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto -
Public Works
Hire at least one full-time
equivalent staff to coordinate
safety efforts between
departments and be a liaison
for citywide safety efforts. Add
additional staff capacity as
specific department needs
are identified.
- -
64Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 447 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SR-2: Implement safety improvements to reduce travel speed Action Items SR-2a. Systemically install proven
countermeasures to manage
motor vehicle speed and
collision angles, such as roadside
appurtenances, roundabouts,
refuge islands, hardened center
lines, and road diets.

Mid-Long
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Mid-term: Implement proven
countermeasures to manage
motor vehicle speed and
collision angles on priority
corridors including potential
quick-build or demonstration
projects.

Long-term: Identify funding
and implement proven
countermeasures in other
parts of the city that have high
numbers of collisions related
to speeding.
-
SR-2b. Evaluate intersection
design and control decisions in
the planning or scoping stage for
opportunities to better prioritize
reducing traffic speed, following
new FHWA guidance.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Install traffic calming
elements that are consistent
with national, state, and
local practice relative to
geometric design, pavement
markings, signs, and
lighting consistent with the
Countermeasure Toolbox.
-
65Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 448 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SR-2c. Use the authority granted
under Assembly Bill 43 (AB43),
together with Modesto’s HIN,
to systematically reduce speed
limits in Business Activity
Districts and “safety corridors,”
as defined by the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.

Short-Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Modesto City Council
Modesto PD
Short-term: Conduct an
Engineering and Traffic Survey
to evaluate the feasibility of
speed limit reductions on HIN
corridors. Coordinate with
Caltrans where required.

Medium-term: draft an
ordinance to lower speed
limits where feasible, conduct
public and stakeholder
outreach and engagement
to share benefits of proposed
ordinance, obtain Council
approval to enact ordinance,
and coordinate enforcement
with Modesto PD.
-
STRATEGY SR-3: Update policies and identify trade-offs to prioritize safety Action Items SR-3a. Explore designation
of functional class and modal
priority for roadways to pinpoint
the most effective safety
countermeasures and streamline
trade-off decisions.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto -
Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Policy considerations can be
developed to ensure safety is
not a design trade-off when
developing and implementing
recommendations.
66Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 449 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SR-3b. Evaluate potential to
establish curbside management,
shared mobility, or micromobility
policies (e.g., permitting,
enforcement) in places that
prioritize pedestrian and bicyclist
safety.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED);
City of Modesto
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development

1. Develop and adopt formal
curbside management, shared
mobility, and micromobility
policies that include
pedestrian and bicyclist safety
considerations.

2. Conduct periodic
enforcement and compliance
assessments of the policies.

3. Periodically evaluate policy
effectiveness, including
tracking reported conflicts,
safety incidents, and
community feedback.
- -
SR-3c. Prioritize safety and
accessibility for all users
during construction and road
maintenance projects. Short
City of Modesto
- Public Works
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Routine accommodation for
pedestrians and bicyclists
during construction projects.
- - -
67Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 450 -
SR: SAFE ROADWAYS
Design streets so that a human error
does not result in the loss of human
life. This includes creating safer
crossings, adding space between
people walking or biking and traffic,
slowing vehicle speeds, improving
lighting, and using design features
that help alert travelers to hazards.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SR-4: Enhance roadway safety through intelligent transportation systems (ITS) Action Items SR-4a. Provide infrastructure for
smarter roadways and intelligent
transportation systems (ITS) in
support of data collection and
analysis, as well as proactive
system management. Consider
long-term network priorities For
ITS implementation, including
pedestrian and bicyclist safety
and mobility needs in high-use
locations.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED);
City of Modesto
- Public Works
California
Department of
Transportation
Expand ITS deployment by
increasing the percentage of
connected signals citywide,
with a focus on corridors with
high pedestrian and bicyclist
activity. Integrate Caltrans ITS
signals into the city’s network
where feasible.
68Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 451 -
Safe Vehicles: Modesto can
improve safety by encouraging
and adopting safer vehicles
on its streets.

Table 5 • Safe Vehicles Recommendations
SV: SAFE VEHICLES
Promote vehicles that are designed
and regulated to minimize the
occurrence and severity of crashes
using safety measures that
incorporate the latest technology.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SV-1: Invest in supportive infrastructure Action Items SV-1a. Consider enabling
infrastructure-to-vehicle
communication to provide
warnings to drivers that support
safer driving behavior.

Mid-Long
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works
Technology
Companies
Universities

1. Explore partnerships with
technology companies
and universities to
develop a strategic plan
of the implementation of
infrastructure-to-vehicle
communication technology,
ensuring alignment
with current and future
transportation needs.

2. Retrofit existing
infrastructure, including lane
signs, road signs, and lighting
systems, with infrastructureto-vehicle communication
technology within the next 5
to 10 years, prioritizing areas
with high traffic volumes and
safety concerns.
-
Promoting vehicles that are designed and regulated to minimize the occurrence and severity of crashes using safety measures that incorporate the latest technology helps improve redundancy and minimize human error. This includes making safety a priority in municipal fleet purchases, supporting commercial and freight safety through appropriate truck routes, and promoting vehicle technologies and features that reduce harm to people walking, biking, and driving.

Safe Street Strategies
69 #19..
- 452 -
SV: SAFE VEHICLES
Promote vehicles that are designed
and regulated to minimize the
occurrence and severity of crashes
using safety measures that
incorporate the latest technology.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SV-1b. Consider providing
supportive infrastructure for
dynamic curbside management. Long
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works

1. Establish a comprehensive
curbside management
strategy to guide the
Modesto’s policies toward
allocating curb space to
different users.

2. Pursue grant opportunities
to fund the development of
smart curb management
technology, aiming to reduce
user conflicts and minimize
loading vehicle idle times.
-
SV-1c. Explore provision of
supportive infrastructure for
autonomous vehicles to enable
active safety technology. Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works

1. Explore the development
of a comprehensive curbside
management strategy to
guide Modesto's policies
toward allocating curb space
to different users.

2. Identify and pursue
potential grant opportunities
to support the exploration
and pilot implementation
of smart curb management
technology, aiming to reduce
user conflicts and minimize
loading vehicle idle times.
-
70Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 453 -
SV: SAFE VEHICLES
Promote vehicles that are designed
and regulated to minimize the
occurrence and severity of crashes
using safety measures that
incorporate the latest technology.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SV-2: Improve freight operations and public fleet management Action Items SV-2a. Implement heavy vehicle
route restrictions to prevent
trucks from traveling through
high-pedestrian areas. Consider
implementing targeted traffic
safety campaigns to engage
truck drivers, emphasizing safe
driving practices and adherence
to designated routes.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
Media &
Communications
Relations

1. Evaluate enforcement
of heavy vehicle route
restrictions through road
signage, policies, and
enforcement strategies to
prevent trucks from passing
through high-pedestrian
areas.

2. Develop and implement
traffic safety education
campaigns targeting truck
drivers, focusing on truck
routes and key safety tips
to enhance awareness and
compliance.

SV-2b. Consider developing
operating guidelines for fleet
operators to ensure safe
practices during loading
activities.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto -
Public Works
Implement and enforce
standardized operating
guidelines for fleet operators,
ensuring safe and efficient
loading practices.
-
71Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 454 -
SV: SAFE VEHICLES
Promote vehicles that are designed
and regulated to minimize the
occurrence and severity of crashes
using safety measures that
incorporate the latest technology.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
STRATEGY SV-3: Advance autonomous/safe driving vehicle technology Action Items SV-3a. Explore equipping City,
Modesto Junior College, school
district, and public institution
fleet vehicles with safety related
devices, designs, and technology
that record dangerous driving
behaviors.

Long
City of Modesto Various

1. Prioritize the acquisition of
smaller, safer municipal fleet
vehicles, such as e-bikes,
interceptors, and compact
cars, whenever feasible.

2. Retrofit all existing
vehicles with safety
monitoring technology in
the next five years.

3. All newly leased or
purchased fleet vehicles are
required to be equipped with
Advanced Driver Assistance
Systems (ADAS), including
pedestrian collision avoidance,
blind spot monitoring, and
lane departure warning.
72Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 455 -
SV: SAFE VEHICLES
Promote vehicles that are designed
and regulated to minimize the
occurrence and severity of crashes
using safety measures that
incorporate the latest technology.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs Funding
Staff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes
Action Items
SV-3b. Collaborate with the
Stanislaus Regional Transit
Authority to explore potential
installation of safety monitoring
technology on current transit
vehicles and implement new
transit vehicle engineering
principles (such as rear-of-vehicle
chevrons, right-side illumination
during turns, and lane departure
technology) to reduce collisions
involving new transit vehicles.

Mid
The Stanislaus
Regional Transit
Authority
-
Explore adoption of policies
that support equipping
the transit fleet with the
most up-to-date vehicle
safety components. Retrofit
existing vehicles with safety
monitoring technology as
feasible.

SV-3c. Explore partnerships
with technology companies
and universities to advance
autonomous/safe driving vehicle
technology around Modesto.

Mid
City of Modesto
Universities;
Technology
Companies
Number of corporate or
university partnerships
developed.
- -
SV-3d. Consider Implementation
of an annual Vision Zero-focused
safe driver training program for
all City, Modesto Junior College,
school districts, and public
institution employees authorized
to operate municipal vehicles.

Long
City of Modesto
Modesto Junior
College;
Sylvan Union School
District;
Empire Union School
District;
Stanislaus Union
School District
Collaborate with City, Modesto
Junior College, school
districts, and public institution
employees who are authorized
to operate municipal vehicles
to complete annual Vision
Zero-focused safe driver
training.
- - -
73Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 456 -
Safe Speeds: High-speed
crashes are devastating
for everyone involved.

Table 6 • Safe Speeds Recommendations
SS: SAFE SPEEDS
Set speed limits, design roadways for
safer speeds, and implement policies
that decrease speed in order to save
lives and reduce the likelihood of a
life altering injury.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes STRATEGY SS-1: Reduce speed through design and operations Action Items SS-1a. Explore adoption of
roadway design standards
that are focused on speed
management, such as target
speed-based design. Adjust
roadway geometries for contextappropriate speeds.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Develop context-sensitive
design guidance and
standards. Update and adopt
design standards. Incorporate
into the General Plan.
- - -
Reducing travel speeds can help to save
lives by reducing impact forces, providing
additional time for drivers to react, and
improving visibility for all road users.

Appropriate speed limits, roadway designs that encourage safer speeds, and policies that reduce speeding are essential steps to saving lives and reducing the likelihood of life altering injuries, especially for vulnerable road users.

Safe Street Strategies
74 #19..
- 457 -
SS: SAFE SPEEDS
Set speed limits, design roadways for
safer speeds, and implement policies
that decrease speed in order to save
lives and reduce the likelihood of a
life altering injury.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes Action Items
SS-1b. Enhance the city's
existing speed-control
infrastructure improvement
efforts, such as speed tables
on Paradise Road and citywide
roundabout implementations,
by prioritizing the HIN and
incorporating appropriate safety
countermeasures.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
Prioritize corridors on the HIN
that encourage high speeds,
including corridors involved
in crash profiles with speed
concerns.
- -
SS-1c. Explore the identification
and implementation of car-free
zones and/or pedestrian priority
zones in downtown. Long
City of Modesto
- Community
& Economic
Development
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)

1. Examine opportunities
and challenges associated
with implementation,
including transportation
vehicle conflicts and curb
management techniques
(drop off zones).

2. Explore a temporary car-free
zone and pedestrian priority
zone along a downtown HIN
street as a proof-of-concept.

3. Establish an approach/
policy to identify car-free
zones in downtown.
75Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 458 -
.
12 As of 2025, automated speed enforcement is not authorized for general use in California. The state currently allows pilot programs in five cities: Glendale, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, under Assembly Bill 645 (2023). If these pilots prove successful in improving safety outcomes, new legislation would need to be introduced and signed by the Governor before cities such as Modesto could establish an automatic speed enforcement program.

Footnote SS: SAFE SPEEDS 12
Set speed limits, design roadways for
safer speeds, and implement policies
that decrease speed in order to save
lives and reduce the likelihood of a
life altering injury.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes STRATEGY SS-2: Improve traffic enforcement Action Items SS-2a. Continue identifying
strategies for enforcement that
respect the concerns of the
community. Short
City of Modesto -
Police Department -

1. Continue working with the
community to understand
key concerns and explore a
context-appropriate approach
to enforcement, such as
automated enforcement and
sliding scale fines.

2. Examine existing
enforcement policies and
consider changed to biking
and walking infractions that
may potentially result in
biased application.
-
SS-2b. Explore deployment of
automated speed enforcement
along HIN corridors and ensure
accuracy and maintenance of
signage.12
Short
City of Modesto -
Public Works
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
Prioritize corridors on the
HIN that encourage high
speeds, including corridors
involved in crash profiles
with speed concerns.
-
76Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 459 -
SS: SAFE SPEEDS
Set speed limits, design roadways for
safer speeds, and implement policies
that decrease speed in order to save
lives and reduce the likelihood of a
life altering injury.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid,
Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation Needs Funding Staff Capacity Relationship Building Policy Changes STRATEGY SS-3: Update policy and training Action items
SS-3a. Follow speed limit setting
methodologies enabled by AB43
to facilitate potential speed limit
reductions on Modesto’s HighInjury Network.

Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works
Conduct Engineering &
Traffic Surveys (E&TS) on
HIN to identify candidates
for speed limit reductions
and coordinate with City
Council to make adoption
recommendation for speed
setting ordinance based on
findings of E&TS.
-
SS-3b. Continue implementing
15 mph school zones to all
schools within the city. Explore
extending these reductions
to areas with other vulnerable
populations, such as senior
housing communities and parks.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works
Work with citywide safety
partners to draft proposed
policy language for adoption
by City Council. Install
updated speed limit signage.
-
SS-3c. Consider providing
speed management training
to engineering staff focused
on fatality and serious injury
minimization.

Mid
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design (TED)
City of Modesto
- Public Works
Work with citywide safety
partners to establish a
recurring speed management
training program for staff.

Conduct periodic evaluations
to assess staff proficiency.
- - -
77Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 460 -
Post-Crash Care: When crashes
do occur, first responders need
quick access to the scene.

Table 7 • Post-Crash Care Recommendations
PCC: POST-CRASH CARE
Prioritize data collection to enable
first responders to quickly locate
crashes, stabilize injuries, and
expedite access to emergency
medical care.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid, Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs
FundingStaff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes STRATEGY PCC-1: Ensure multi- agency partnerships Action Items PCC-1a. Strengthen sharing
of key insights from crash
investigations with roadway
designers. Short
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
City of Modesto
Police Department
Identify key agency
partners and establish
a recurring meeting (bimonthly or quarterly) to
facilitate communication
and coordination for crash
investigations and roadway
design responses.
- -
After a crash, Modesto and its partners
can analyze data from the incident to
better understand safety challenges and
support system improvements.

Recommendations to improve post-crash care can focus on data reporting and documentation, including gaining data around near-miss incidents.

Safe Street Strategies
78 #19..
- 461 -
PCC: POST-CRASH CARE
Prioritize data collection to enable
first responders to quickly locate
crashes, stabilize injuries, and
expedite access to emergency
medical care.

Timeline
(Short,
Mid, Long)
Lead Agency Supporting
Partner(s) Performance Target
Implementation
Needs
FundingStaff CapacityRelationship BuildingPolicy Changes Action Items
PCC-1b. Consider establishing
a cross-agency fatal crash team
of emergency medical services,
police, transportation, public
health, and City officials to
convene at the crash site after a
fatal crash. Leverage emerging
big data sources and data
collection innovation.

Mid-Long
City of Modesto
Police Department
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering &
Design; Stanislaus
County Public
Health; Stanislaus
County Emergency
Services
Short-term: Identify relevant
agency partners and establish a
set of criteria for site evaluation.

Medium-term: Implement
a cross-agency fatal crash
response team to convene
at crash sites following fatal
incidents.
- -
PCC-1c. Explore ways to
incorporate and expand
proxy data sources such as
hospital records. Long
Stanislaus County
Public Health
City of Modesto
- Transportation
Engineering
& Design
Work with local hospitals, the
Department of Health, and
universities to identify crashrelated patient records that can be shared on a regular basis.
-
PCC-1d. Explore programs that
allow for alternative response
units to alleviate the overuse
of the 911 system. These units
would be redirecting non urgent
medical calls, reducing the
number of Fire Department
responses and lowering the risk
of crashes involving emergency
vehicles and the public.

Mid
City of Modesto -
Fire Department
Stanislaus County
Public Health;
Stanislaus County
Emergency
Services
Decrease unnecessary Code
3 Fire Department Responses
and reduce average response
time.

PCC-1e. Explore innovative
programs that would allow the
Fire Department to use whole
blood / blood products and
ultrasound equipment to better
treat trauma patients involved in
injury collisions.

Mid
City of Modesto -
Fire Department
Stanislaus County
Public Health;
Stanislaus County
Emergency
Services
These lifesaving interventions
improve the survivability of
patients allowing for the Fire
Department to provide services
in the field that would normally
be provided in the hospital
setting.
- -
79Safe Street Strategies
#19..
- 462 -
Improving Modesto’s Streets
05 #19..
- 463 -
Introduction
Improving Modesto’s streets through physical changes
and enhanced design standards is a vital piece of
reaching zero annual traffic deaths and serious injuries.

Crash data reveals trends and priority
locations and tells us more about which types
of improvements are expected to have the
greatest impact on transportation safety.

By evaluating the larger context of a crash,
we can learn about the physical roadway
characteristics associated with the crash,
learn more about the possible behaviors that
influenced the crash, and understand other
factors, like land use or lighting, that may have
been a factor. This information in turn informs
recommendations, or countermeasures,
that are known to improve safety based on
these challenges. This chapter begins with
success stories from peer communities that
have used proven Vision Zero strategies to
lower speeds, calm intersections, and protect
people walking and biking. These examples
demonstrate the types of changes that can
guide Modesto’s own progress.

Modesto is already moving in this direction.

Recent investments such as roundabouts,
traffic calming projects, accessibility
upgrades, and new walking and biking
connections show how the City is beginning
to reshape streets. Building on these
successes, this chapter also introduces the
safety countermeasures used to address
the collision profiles in Chapter 2. These
treatments represent proven tools for
improving safety and form the foundation
of Modesto’s practical approach to creating
safer streets.
81Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 464 -
Fremont, California13
Fremont, a medium-sized city in the San Francisco Bay Area with a population roughly the same as Modesto (228,000), cut fatalities by 45% through street redesign and lower speed limits from 2015 to 2020. Taking an engineering focused approach, the City narrowed all 12- to 14-foot wide lanes to a 10-foot travel lane standard on all arterial roadways. The extra two to four feet of lane width was used to add bike lane buffers, which improve safety and comfort for cyclists. These changes led to a 32% decrease in pedestrian fatalities and a 67% decrease in fatal and serious injury collisions among youth. Notably, lowering posted speed limits resulted in a 52% drop in collisions on roads with a posted speed limit of 40 mph or more. 13 Bomberg, M., & Larsen, H. (n.d.). Fremont vision zero – a safe city getting safer. City of Fremont. https://www.westernite.org/annualmeetings/19_Monterey/Presentations/2A/2A-Bomberg-Paper.pdf Source: City of Fremoant, protected intersection
Vision Zero
Success Stories
Adopting a Vision Zero
resolution can be an
important first step
for Modesto.

It is important to remember that progress
toward significant reduction in deaths and
serious injuries on our roads and eventual
elimination of severe crashes is achievable
but requires ongoing collaboration and
commitment. Here are just a few success
stories that can inspire and motivate
Modesto’s Vision Zero journey.
82Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 465 -
Madison, Wisconsin14
Madison, a mid-sized city with a population
of around 270,000, has made significant
progress with its Vision Zero program since
adopting the policy in 2020. Since then, the
City has worked to reduce speeds through
initiatives like “20 is Plenty,” redesigned
high-risk intersections, and prioritized
improvements on its High-Injury Network,
including protected bike lanes, safer
pedestrian crossings, and traffic-calming
measures. These engineering changes have
been combined with enforcement and public
education efforts as part of a Safe System
Approach, which recognizes that crashes
will happen but designs streets to minimize
the risk of death or serious injury. This
comprehensive strategy has helped Madison
achieve a 29% drop in its killed or seriously
injured (KSI) crash rate from 2020 to 2023
and a 58% reduction in traffic fatalities by
2024 compared to 2020. Citywide speed limit
reductions along with systemic infrastructure
improvements are seen as key elements of
Madison’s success.
14 Smith, T. (2025, August 5). Celebrating Vision
Zero successes: Small wins, big impact. Vision
Zero Network. https://visionzeronetwork.org/
small-wins-big-impact/
Source: Spectrum News 1, Madison, WI Vision Zero campaign. 83Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 466 -
Hoboken, New Jersey15
Hoboken, New Jersey, a smaller city with a
population of around 60,000, has achieved
traffic safety success through a commitment
to the Safe System Approach. After the
City launched its Vision Zero initiative in
2019, it convened a task force and created
a data-driven action plan that focused on
safe roads, safe speeds, safe users, and safe
vehicles. Hoboken then implemented a
host of engineering interventions, including
high-visibility and raised crosswalks, curb
extensions, daylighted intersections, and
other traffic-calming measures. The City also
lowered speed limits to 20 mph citywide and
to 15 mph in school zones. These engineering
and policy actions, combined with strong
enforcement measures and other steps aimed
at institutionalizing safety, have allowed
Hoboken to achieve seven consecutive years
without a traffic fatality, making it a national
model for Vision Zero programs.
15 City of Hoboken. (2024, January 31). City of
Hoboken reaches new Vision Zero milestone:

Seven consecutive years without a traffic death.
https://www.hobokennj.gov/news/city-ofhoboken-reaches-new-vision-zero-milestoneseven-consecutive-years-without-a-trafficdeath Source: City of Hoboken
84Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 467 -
BUS
Anatomy of a Safe Street
Safe streets help keep all roadway users safe. However, not all safe streets look the same. By responding to crash data and the context of local streets, Modesto can advance safety through improved street design.

The following elements represent the anatomy of a safe street that supports Safe System principles:

Safe speed
limits for all
road users
Safe and
accessible
sidewalks
Safe access
to transit
Safe street
crossings and
signal operations
Safe visibility
at night
Safe and
low-stress
bikeways
Improving Modesto’s Streets
85 #19..
- 468 -
Celebrating Modesto’s Successes
In addition to the safety planning
milestones outlined in Chapter 1, Modesto
is moving the needle on safety through the
implementation of roundabouts, accessibility
upgrades, and a wide range of access
improvements such as traffic calming and
active transportation projects.

These on-the-ground investments
demonstrate the City’s commitment to
creating safer, more connected streets while
reinforcing the strategies and priorities
identified throughout this plan. The following
examples highlight recent projects that
illustrate how Modesto is already putting safer
street design into practice across the city.

Traffic Calming Safety Improvements
Modesto transformed Paradise Road from a high-risk, car-dominated corridor into a safer, more multimodal street through a comprehensive redesign.16 The project, funded in part by a $3.5 million Active Transportation Program grant, included a road diet to reduce vehicle lanes and calm traffic, the addition of bike lanes, and filling in missing sidewalks. Safety improvements also included high-visibility crosswalks, raised speed tables, refuge islands, medians, curb extensions, and flashing pedestrian beacons, particularly near Modesto High School and surrounding residential areas. By improving street geometry, slowing traffic, and making crossings safer, the redesign has created a corridor that better accommodates pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers, significantly enhancing overall safety and enables safe routes to school. 16 Holland, John. “Grant Upgrades Modesto’s Paradise Road for Walking, Bikes.” The Modesto Bee, January 26, 2023. https://www.modbee.com/news/local/article271656082.html Source: Modesto Bee, Modesto High School students walk to class across the improved Paradise Road 86Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 469 -
Modesto Intersection
Improvements
Roundabouts are one of the most effective tools
available for improving intersection safety. National
research consistently shows that converting a signalized intersection to a roundabout can reduce severe crashes
by up to 78 percent and lower total crashes by nearly
50 percent.17 These safety gains come from the way
roundabouts naturally slow vehicle speeds, simplify
decision-making, and reduce the types of high-impact
collisions. With roundabouts, head-on and high-speed
right angle collisions are virtually eliminated.18
= potential collision conflict point
17 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Safety Manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC:

AASHTO, 2010.
18 Federal Highway Administration. Low-Cost Treatments
for Horizontal Curve Safety. Report No. FHWA-SA-15-084, January 2016. U.S. Department of Transportation. https:// highways.dot.gov/safety/rwd/keep-vehicles-road/horizontalcurve/low-cost-treatments-horizontal-curve-safety-2016-7 Improving Modesto’s Streets
87 #19..
- 470 -
Modesto’s own data reinforces these national findings. As part of the Proactive Risk Assessment for this plan (Appendix C: Risk Factor Analysis Memorandum), the City compared collision patterns at signalized intersections and roundabouts across the local network.

A preliminary analysis showed they experience far fewer severe crashes on the order of four to six times fewer than would be expected based on their share of intersections citywide.19 This outcome aligns with national evidence and highlights the potential for roundabouts to play a larger role in Modesto’s long-term safety strategy.

As of 2025, the City of Modesto has installed 41 roundabouts and traffic circles citywide, with an additional six intersections in the design or construction phases. Consistent with the Safe System approach, these intersection treatments reduce conflict points and vehicle speeds, lowering the likelihood and severity of crashes while creating a calmer, more predictable travel environment for people walking, biking, and driving. The roundabout at Claratina Avenue and Coffee Road illustrates these benefits by simplifying intersection movements, moderating speeds on a high-volume corridor, and improving crossing conditions for people walking and biking through shorter, more predictable crossings. 19 This estimate is based on the severity-weighted comparison of roundabouts and signalized intersections completed as part of the Proactive Risk Assessment. See Appendix C: Risk Factor Analysis Memorandum, Table 10.

Access and Active
Transportation Improvements
Modesto has also advanced a number of projects that expand safe access for people walking and biking. These investments strengthen connectivity, provide comfortable options for short trips, and help reduce reliance on higher risk travel modes. In addition to projects along Claus Road and East Briggsmore Avenue, two notable examples are the Virginia Corridor Trail, which continues to grow into a centerpiece of the city’s active transportation network, and the Modesto Junior College Bike Path, a low cost project that converted underused roadway space into a protected connection.

Intersection of Claratina Avenue and Coffee Road
Buffered Bike Lanes along E. Briggsmore Avenue
Improving Modesto’s Streets
88 #19..
- 471 -
The Virginia Corridor Trail20
The Virginia Corridor Trail in Modesto began as a rail-trail along the former Tidewater Southern Railway and has gradually expanded to improve connectivity, safety, and recreation. The current Phase 7 of the project adds a half-mile of shared use paved trail from Woodrow Avenue to West Union Avenue, including a 10-foot-wide path, landscaping, lighting, and a pedestrian/bike bridge over Standiford Avenue. This expansion closes gaps in the trail network, links neighborhoods, and provides a safe, off-street route for walking and biking. The Trail’s continued expansion demonstrates an ongoing commitment to providing enhanced recreational opportunities, supporting physical activity, and enabling a safe alternative travel mode for Modestans. 20 City of Modesto. Virginia Corridor Trailway Phase 7 Project. https://www.modestogov.com/2608/Virginia-Corridor-Trailway-Phase-7-Proje 21 Strong Towns. “Infrastructure Contest: Modesto Junior College Campus Connection.” Strong Towns (Archive), October 24, 2016. https://archive.strongtowns.org/ journal/2016/10/24/infrastructure-contest-modesto-campus-connection Modesto Junior College Bike Path21
The Modesto Junior College Bike Path is a key infrastructure project linking MJC’s East and West campuses. Spanning 2.2 miles, this protected route provides a safe and convenient commuting option for students and staff. Developed as a priority by both the City of Modesto and the college, and originally identified in the City’s Bicycle Master Plan, the project navigated challenges like funding and site constraints.

The Path was constructed for a relatively low cost by making use of surplus roadway space. Now complete, it offers a comfortable way for students to travel between campuses and was selected as one of five top Infrastructure Projects of 2016 by Strong Towns.

Source: City of Modesto, The Virginia Corridor Trail pedestrian bridge rendering. 圀攀猀琀
䔀愀猀琀
Source: City of Modesto, Map of the bike route
Improving Modesto’s Streets
89 #19..
- 472 -
Modesto’s Countermeasures
Collision characteristics, public input, and
location-specific conditions helped the project
team identify the most significant crash trends.

These patterns are summarized as Collision
Profiles in Chapter 2, which highlight roadway
and other environmental conditions that
contribute to a large share of fatal and serious
injury crashes, especially those involving
people walking, biking, or rolling.

For each Collision Profile, the project team
identified a shortlist of countermeasures,
many of which are proven engineering
strategies that can reduce or prevent the types
of crashes described. These countermeasures
were then organized into a comprehensive
Safety Countermeasure Toolbox for use
across Modesto. Additional countermeasures
have been incorporated into the toolbox to
address a more comprehensive set of safety
issues in Modesto. These countermeasures
followed an adapted version of the Safe
System Roadway Design Hierarchy, helping
the recommendations address the root causes
of severe crashes while improving safety for
all travelers.22
22 Hopwood, C., Little, K., & Gaines, D. (2024). Safe
System Roadway Design Hierarchy: Engineering
and infrastructure-related countermeasures to
effectively reduce roadway fatalities and serious
injuries (Report No. FHWA SA 22 069). U.S. Department
of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/
files/2024-01/Safe_System_Roadway_Design_
Hierarchy.pdf

1. Demand Management
Demand management focuses on preventing crashes by addressing how much, when, and where people drive. Providing convenient transportation options by carpool, transit, walking or biking means fewer vehicle trips and fewer opportunities for conflicts.

2. Speed Management
To reduce speeds, these countermeasures support the design and operation of streets that encourage safe and context-appropriate vehicle speeds.

3. Conflict Management
These countermeasures use design and operational measures to separate vulnerable road users and vehicles in time and space to help avoid severe conflicts.

4. Improve Redundancy
These countermeasures give road users the information and options they need to make safer choices. They may include improved signage, wayfinding, or route design that offers safe alternatives and reduces exposure to potential crash risk.

Examples include speed feedback signs, markings and signage, and high-visibility pedestrian crossing improvements.

The hierarchy is organized into a ranked list:
90Improving Modesto’s Streets
#19..
- 473 -
Safety Countermeasure Toolbox
The Safety Countermeasure Toolbox is a practical guide for applying a set of evidence-based engineering strategies aligned with the Safe System Approach to address identified concerns. Safety countermeasures are key tools for achieving near-term progress toward implementing Vision Zero principles. Many can be implemented quickly using pilot or “quick-build” materials, while others can be integrated into long-term capital projects to deliver lasting benefits.

A total of 56 countermeasures were identified for Modesto. To ensure consistent application of the Toolbox, countermeasure selection guidance was developed based on Safe System Approach principles, helping the City address safety issues highlighted in the Collision Profiles while also identifying proactive improvements on local roads, as detailed further in Chapter 6. Table 8 presents 10 of the most common and broadly applicable countermeasures that can be implemented across a wide range of street types and contexts citywide. All countermeasures are organized into the four categories of the adapted Safe System Roadway Design Hierarchy, providing a balanced framework that prioritizes conflict reduction, effective speed management, and a more predictable environment for all roadway users. A complete list and description of all countermeasures can be found in Appendix F: Safety Countermeasure Selection Guidance and Toolbox.

Table 8 • High Profile Countermeasures by Safe System Design Hierarchy Hierarchy Countermeasure Description

1. Demand
Management Transit Stop Improvement
Enhances comfort, visibility,
and accessibility at bus stops to
reduce barriers to transit use.

Improving Modesto’s Streets
91 #19..
- 474 -
Hierarchy Countermeasure Description

2. Speed
Management
Road Diet
Reconfigures travel lanes to
calm traffic, improve safety, and
create space for multimodal
improvements or medians.

Raised Crosswalk
Elevates the crossing to slow
vehicles and increase pedestrian
visibility. Often used at key
intersections or in school zones.

Curb Extensions
Extensions of the sidewalk past
the existing curb to shorten
crossing distances and make
people outside of cars more
visible to drivers.

Improving Modesto’s Streets
92 #19..
- 475 -
Hierarchy Countermeasure Description

3. Separate in Space
and Time
Separated Bikeway
Provides a spatial or physical
barrier between people biking
or rolling and motor vehicle
traffic to reduce conflicts and
increase comfort.

Raised median
Creates a center refuge and
helps manage car turning
movements to reduce midblock
and intersection conflicts for all
roadway users.

Signalized Pedestrian Crossings
Adds a dedicated pedestrian
signal phase or other signal
improvement that provide safe,
predictable opportunities for
people to cross the roadway.

Improving Modesto’s Streets
93 #19..
- 476 -
Hierarchy Countermeasure Description

4. Improve
Redundancy
Reflective pavement markings
Markings to improve lane
visibility, especially at night or in
wet conditions, to guide drivers
and help minimize cars leaving
the roadway.

Flashing yellow arrow signals
Clarifies turning movements at
intersections, helping drivers
yield properly to pedestrians and
oncoming traffic
Speed feedback signs
Displays a driver’s current speed
to raise awareness and encourage
speed reduction.

Improving Modesto’s Streets
94 #19..
- 477 -
Countermeasures for Collision Profiles
Building on the Collision Profiles in Chapter 2, Table 9 includes the primary and secondary countermeasures to address each profile. These countermeasures were selected based on detailed analysis of crash data, roadway context, and public input. Each countermeasure directly responds to the underlying causes of collisions identified in the data, such as excessive speed, lack of visibility, or unsafe turning movements.

Together, the Collision Profiles and the Safety Countermeasure Toolbox provide a framework to guide the development of recommended projects that will help Modesto advance its adoption of Vision Zero principles Table 9 • Recommended Countermeasures by Collision Profile Collision Profile # of KSI Collisions
(% of all KSI collisions)
Countermeasure
Application Primary Countermeasures Secondary
Countermeasures
1 Pedestrian-Involved
Collisions Near Transit
Stops and Within
Disadvantaged
Communities
88 (12%)
These countermeasures
aim to improve safe
access to transit services.
High Visibility
Crosswalk
Straighten Crosswalk
Leading
Pedestrian Interval
New
Pedestrian Crossing
Flashing Beacon
(RRFB)
Relocate Bus Stops
Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon
Curb Extensions
Segment Lighting
Refuge Island
Improving Modesto’s Streets
95 #19..
- 478 -
Collision Profile # of KSI Collisions
(% of all KSI collisions)
Countermeasure
Application Primary Countermeasures Secondary
Countermeasures
2 DUI Overnight Collisions
83 (11%)
These countermeasures
aim to incorporate
redundant safety
measures and employ
programmatic strategies.
Rumble Strips
Reflectors, and/or
Object Markers
Guardrail
Speed Limit
Reduction*
Travel Demand
Management
Policies*
Public Information
Campaigns*
Targeted
Enforcement
and Deterrence*
Widen Shoulder
Speed
Feedback Sign
Safety Edge
Improved
Pavement Friction
3 Broadside Collisions at
Signalized Major-Minor
Intersections
55 (7%)
These countermeasures
intend to reduce or
separate turning
movement conflicts and
slow vehicles approaching
and traversing
intersections.
Extended Yellow
and All-Red Time
Leading
Pedestrian Interval
Protected Left Turns
Red Light Camera
Protected
Intersection
Road Diet,
Roundabout
Bike Signal/
Exclusive Bike Phase
Speed Limit
Reduction*
Remove Sight
Obstructions
Centerline Hardening
*Non-infrastructure countermeasure
Improving Modesto’s Streets
96 #19..
- 479 -
Collision Profile # of KSI Collisions
(% of all KSI collisions)
Countermeasure
Application Primary Countermeasures Secondary
Countermeasures
4 Bicycle-Involved Collisions
at Intersections Without
On-Street Bicycle Facilities
41 (5%)
These countermeasures
aim to increase
bike visibility at the
intersection, slow vehicles,
and reduce turning
movement conflicts.
Extend Bike Lane
to Intersection
Bike Box
Mixing Zone
Prohibit Right Turn
on Red
Road Diet
Bike Signal/Exclusive
Bike Phase
Protected
Intersection
Pavement Reflectors
Widen Shoulder
Provide Appropriate
Sightlines
5 Broadside Collisions Near
Unsignalized Intersections
Involving Bicycles
26 (3%)
These countermeasures
are focused on improving
the visibility of bicyclists at
intersections, upgrading
intersection controls,
and other infrastructure
changes that reduce crash
severity.
All-Way Stop Control
Intersection Lighting
Raised Median
Roundabout Varies
Signal
High Friction
Surface Treatment
Improve Sightlines
Improving Modesto’s Streets
97 #19..
- 480 -
Collision Profile # of KSI Collisions
(% of all KSI collisions)
Countermeasure
Application Primary Countermeasures Secondary
Countermeasures
6 Bicycle and PedestrianInvolved Collisions at
Signalized Intersections
Downtown
11 (1%)
These countermeasures
are focused on
improving the visibility of
vulnerable road users at
intersections, improving
signal phasing to reduce
conflicts with pedestrians
and bicyclists, and
other changes that reduce
turning
movement conflicts.
Bike Box
High Visibility
Crosswalk
Prohibit Right
Turn on Red
Leading
Pedestrian Interval
Protected Left Turns
Red Light Camera
Bike Signal/Exclusive
Bike Phase
Protected
Intersection
Curb Extensions
Segment Lighting
Refuge Island
7 Midblock Overnight
Hit Object Collisions
11 (1%)
These countermeasures
aim to improve visibility
for and of all modes in
dark conditions and create
safety redundancies in
anticipation of impaired
visibility or reaction times.
Delineators,
Reflectors, and/or
Object Markers
Rumble Strips
Guardrail
Segment Lighting
Pavement Reflectors
Widen Shoulder
Provide Appropriate
Sightlines
Improving Modesto’s Streets
98 #19..
- 481 -
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪
¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
ׄ־
#19..
- 482 -
Thisڑnal chapter builds upon the key elements of Modesto’s Safety Action Plan to create a roadmap for lasting and transformative safety change. UɅ٪ȉɍɅǳǛǾƲȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬىȷ٪ɅǛƲȯƲƫ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕ٪Ʌȉ٪ prioritizing corridors for investment and ǛǾɅȯȉƫɍƤƲȷ٪Ƈ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅ٪ ɅǕƇɅ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ƤȉǾȷǛȷɅƲǾɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷƤƇǳƇƣǳƲ٪ ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ȉɥƲȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǳȉǾǍ٪ ɅƲȯǼؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ƤǕƇȬɅƲȯ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ǕǛǍǕǳǛǍǕɅȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯƲȷɍǳɅȷ٪ of the “Let Kids Cross” pilot traf𿿿c safety ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇǾ٪ȉɥƲȯɥǛƲɦ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƇɅǕɦƇɬȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ƇƫɥƇǾƤƲ٪ ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷؘ UǾ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾؙ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ƤǕƇȬɅƲȯ٪ǛǾɅȯȉƫɍƤƲȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪%ƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪GɍǛƫƲؙ٪Ƈ٪ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬعǳƲƫ٪ɅƲǼȬȉȯƇȯɬ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ Ƈǳǳȉɦȷ٪ȬƇȯɅǾƲȯȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǛǳȉɅ٪ǳȉɦعƤȉȷɅؙ٪ȷǕȉȯɅعɅƲȯǼ٪ ǛǾɅƲȯɥƲǾɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅƲ٪ɅǕƲǛȯ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǾƲȷȷؘ٪ ½ǕƲȷƲ٪ƫƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ɅƲȷɅ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾȷؙ٪ ƲǾǍƇǍƲ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣɍǛǳƫ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ǌȉȯ٪ ǳȉǾǍƲȯعɅƲȯǼ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ƤȯƲƇɅǛǾǍ٪Ƈ٪ƣȯǛƫǍƲ٪ ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ȬǳƇǾǾǛǾǍ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؘ jƇȷɅǳɬؙ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ƤǕƇȬɅƲȯ٪ƫƲȷƤȯǛƣƲȷ٪Ǖȉɦ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ will measure progress towards Vision Zero ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ɅȯƇǾȷȬƇȯƲǾɅؙ٪ȉǾǍȉǛǾǍ٪ȯƲȬȉȯɅǛǾǍ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȷƲɅȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȷɅƇǍƲ٪ǌȉȯ٪Ƈ٪ǌȉȯɅǕƤȉǼǛǾǍ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ɅƲȯǼ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ɦȉȯǯȬǳƇǾ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ǛƫƲǾɅǛǌɬ٪ immediate,٪𿿿scally constrained actions the ǛɅɬ٪ƤƇǾ٪ɅƇǯƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǍɍǛƫƲ٪ƲƇȯǳɬ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ȉǾ٪ ɅǕǛȷ٪ȬǳƇǾؘ ֿ־־ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 483 -
¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ Prioritization for this plan was a data-driven process to identify and rank roadway segments with the highest potential for safety improvement. This network prioritization process brings together data, community feedback, and other factors to guide future investments where the greatest need exists and the greatest impact can be made. How Does ¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ٪Ýȉȯǯ؟ -ƇƤǕ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅ٪ǛǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ɦƇȷ٪ ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅƲƫ٪ƇǍƇǛǾȷɅ٪ȷƲɥƲȯƇǳ٪ǯƲɬ٪ǌƇƤɅȉȯȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ ƫƲɅƲȯǼǛǾƲ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪Ƥȉɍǳƫ٪ȷƇɥƲ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ǼȉȷɅ٪ǳǛɥƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǼȉȷɅ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ƇǾƇǳɬȷǛȷ٪ƤȉǼƣǛǾƲƫ٪ƲǛǍǕɅ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ re˛ect Modesto’s safety goals, including crash ȯǛȷǯؙ٪ƲȮɍǛɅɬؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅǛɥǛɅɬ٪حFǛǍɍȯƲ٪خ׃ؘ ¤ȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ɦƲȯƲ٪ȷƤȉȯƲƫ٪ƣƇȷƲƫ٪ȉǾؚ Safety Data ɥƲȯǳƇȬ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪OǛǍǕ٪UǾǬɍȯɬ٪vƲɅɦȉȯǯ٪ حOUvخ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪¤ȯȉƇƤɅǛɥƲ٪§Ǜȷǯ٪ȷȷƲȷȷǼƲǾɅ ȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪UǾȬɍɅ Locations identi𿿿ed by residents ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ɦȉȯǯȷǕȉȬȷؙ٪ȬȉȬعɍȬȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȉǾǳǛǾƲ٪ǼƇȬȷ Equity Impact ¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ǳȉƤƇɅƲƫ٪ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ȉȯ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ %ǛȷƇƫɥƇǾɅƇǍƲƫ٪ ȉǼǼɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ Access and Connectivity ¤ȯȉɫǛǼǛɅɬ٪Ʌȉ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷؙ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬǳƇǾǾƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǾƲɅɦȉȯǯȷ tȉƫƲ٪¯ǕǛǌɅ٪¤ȉɅƲǾɅǛƇǳ ȯƲƇȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƣǛǯǛǾǍؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ ֿ־ֿ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 484 -
Figure 5 • -ǛǍǕɅ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ High Injury Network Safety Risk Index Community Feedback Equity Impact Transit Access School Proximity Mode Shift Potential Non-Motorized Network Completeness Roadways Prioritization Score Select Corridors ¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ٪ §ƲȷɍǳɅȷ The results of the prioritization analysis حtƇȬ٪ ֿخ׀٪ȷǕȉɦ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȷɅ٪ȷƤȉȯǛǾǍ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ ƇȯƲ٪ƤȉǾƤƲǾɅȯƇɅƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ƫȉɦǾɅȉɦǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƇǳȉǾǍ٪ǼƇǬȉȯ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪vƲƲƫǕƇǼ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅؙ٪ ׇɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅؙ٪ãȉȷƲǼǛɅƲ٪ ȉɍǳƲɥƇȯƫؙ٪
ȉǌǌƲƲ٪ §ȉƇƫؙ٪tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪½ɍǳǳɬ٪§ȉƇƫؘ٪ ½ǕƲȷƲ٪ƇȯƲ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȉɥƲȯǳƇȬ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ƇɅ٪ǳƲƇȷɅ٪ ȉǾƲ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪OUvȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪ǾƲƇȯƣɬ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȷɅȉȬȷؘ Of the 9,625 street segments analyzed, 338 ɦƲȯƲ٪ȷƤȉȯƲƫ٪Ƈȷ٪ǕƇɥǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȷɅ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬؙ٪ ƤȉǼȬȯǛȷǛǾǍ٪ƇȬȬȯȉɫǛǼƇɅƲǳɬ٪ׂڤ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ɅȉɅƇǳ٪ ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ƤƲǾɅƲȯǳǛǾƲ٪ǼǛǳƲƇǍƲؘ٪ǳǳ٪ƲɫƤƲȬɅ٪Ʌɦȉ٪ȉǌ٪ ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǳȉƤƇɅƲƫ٪ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ SB535 Disadvantaged Communities. Further detail on the prioritization process, scoring ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌɍǳǳ٪ȯƲȷɍǳɅȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǌȉɍǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪Gؚ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪¤ȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ٪ tƲǼȉȯƇǾƫɍǼؘ ֿ׀־ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 485 -
Map 12 • ¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅǛɶƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȯƲȷɍǳɅȷ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ־ׁ #19..
- 486 -
Recommendations Based on the results of the prioritization process, the project team analyzed spatial patterns and identi𿿿ed ׀ׇؘ׃٪ǼǛǳƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ȉǾ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪׆ؘ׆٪ ǼǛǳƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ȉǾ٪ȷɅƇɅƲعȉɦǾƲƫ٪ ȯȉƇƫȷؘ These corridors were identi𿿿ed by ƤȉǼƣǛǾǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǾɅǛǍɍȉɍȷ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ƤȉǾȷǛȷɅƲǾɅǳɬ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȷƤȉȯƲȷؘ٪ Recommendations are organized into three tiers, re˛ect different levels of priority, design ƫƲɅƇǛǳؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǬɍȯǛȷƫǛƤɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȯƲȷȬȉǾȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬؘ٪ ȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬعȯƲȬȉȯɅƲƫ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȯǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȉȬƲȯƇɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳȷ٪ɦƲȯƲ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ƤȉǾȷǛƫƲȯƲƫ٪ɦǕƲǾ٪ ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛǾǍ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷؘ٪ ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ ȷǕȉɦǾ٪ƤȉǾȷǛȷɅƲǾɅ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛȷȷɍƲȷ٪ȉɥƲȯ٪ɅǛǼƲ٪ɦƲȯƲ٪ prioritized in higher tiers. ½ǛƲȯ٪U SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS ¤ȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ǾƲƇȯعɅƲȯǼ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȷɅعȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷɅƇɅƲعȉɦǾƲƫ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷؘ٪ ½ǛƲȯ٪UU MID-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS Offers typology-based recommendations for other city-owned priority corridors identi𿿿ed as mid- ɅƲȯǼ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅǛƲȷؘ ½ǛƲȯ٪UUU LONGER-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS Identi𿿿es additional state-owned priority corridors where Modesto will coordinate with Caltrans to advance safety improvements on a longer time horizon. ֿ־ׂ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 487 -
Map 13 • ¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƣɬ٪½ǛƲȯ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׃־ #19..
- 488 -
TIER III TIER II 23.5 Other City-Managed Priority Corridors 6.9 High-Priority Locations 7.9 Other State-Owned Priority Corridors Priority Corridor Composition by TierTIER I Figure 6 • ¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ٪
ȉǼȬȉȷǛɅǛȉǾ٪ƣɬ٪½ǛƲȯ ½ǛƲȯ٪U Short-Term Recommendations Tier I includes locations identi𿿿ed as the most urgent opportunities ǌȉȯ٪ǾƲƇȯعɅƲȯǼ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؘ٪-ƇƤǕ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȯƲƤƲǛɥƲƫ٪Ƈ٪ǌȉƤɍȷƲƫؙ٪ site-speci𿿿c review informed by crash history, community input, and ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ƤȉǾɅƲɫɅؘ٪½ǛƲȯ٪ֿ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲȷ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷɅƇɅƲع٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤǛɅɬعȉɦǾƲƫ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷؙ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯƲƤȉǍǾǛɅǛȉǾ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ǕǛǍǕعȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ɍǾƫƲȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǬɍȯǛȷƫǛƤɅǛȉǾ٪ ȉǌ٪ ƇǳǛǌȉȯǾǛƇ٪%ƲȬƇȯɅǼƲǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ح
ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷخ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲ٪ ǛǾɅƲȯƇǍƲǾƤɬ٪ƤȉȉȯƫǛǾƇɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؘ Fȉȯ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ǼȉȯƲ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳƲƫ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅƲƫ٪ ƣɬ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅɍƇǳ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾȷؙ٪ɦǕǛƤǕ٪ǛǳǳɍȷɅȯƇɅƲ٪Ǖȉɦ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ Ƥȉɍǳƫ٪ɅƇǯƲ٪ȷǕƇȬƲ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȯȉɍǾƫ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ƇǾ٪ǛǾǛɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȷȷƲȷȷǼƲǾɅ٪ of engineering feasibility. These concepts are not٪𿿿nal engineering plans, but they help visualize where crosswalks, curb extensions, lane ƇƫǬɍȷɅǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ǌƲƇɅɍȯƲȷ٪Ƥȉɍǳƫ٪ǼƇǯƲ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ȷƇǌƲȯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲɥƲȯɬȉǾƲؘ٪ ½ǕƲɬ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ƲǾƇƣǳƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪Ʌȉ٪ƣƲɅɅƲȯ٪ȬɍȯȷɍƲ٪ǍȯƇǾɅ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǼȉȯƲ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳ٪ƇƣȉɍɅ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǕǛǍǕعȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪Oؚ٪½ǛƲȯ٪U OǛǍǕع¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪§ƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪tƲǼȉȯƇǾƫɍǼؘ׀ׁ ׀ׁ٪ ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫؙ٪ƇǯƫƇǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪O٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷɅɍƫɬؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ȉǌ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȯƲǳƲƇȷƲ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬɍƣǳǛƤ٪ɦǕƲǾ٪ƇɥƇǛǳƇƣǳƲؘ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ־ׄ #19..
- 489 -
Table 10 • ½ǛƲȯ٪U٪
ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ
ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ FȯȉǼ ½ȉ jƲǾǍɅǕ٪حǼǛǳƲȷخ̄ ɅƇɅƲ٪ȉȯ٪jȉƤƇǳ٪ɦǾƲȯȷǕǛȬ ֿׅɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ vƲƲƫǕƇǼ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ G٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 0.3 jȉƤƇǳ ȯǛǍǍȷǼȉȯƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪
ƇȯɥƲȯ٪§ȉƇƫ vإ 0.3 jȉƤƇǳ
ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫ ¯ƤƲǾǛƤ٪%ȯǛɥƲ ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ 1.0 jȉƤƇǳ El Vista Avenue ãȉȷƲǼǛɅƲ٪ ȉɍǳƲɥƇȯƫ٪ح̄ɅƇɅƲ٪ §ȉɍɅƲ٪ֿׁخ׀̄ ƤƲǾǛƤ٪%ȯǛɥƲ 1.0 jȉƤƇǳ O٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 5th Street ֿȷɅ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 0.3 jȉƤƇǳ٪ O٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ֿ׆ɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 10th Street 0.5 jȉƤƇǳ٪ ƇǯƫƇǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫ ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ Fǳȉɬƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ 1.0 jȉƤƇǳ §ɍǼƣǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫ ¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ ȉǳǳƲǍƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ 1.5 jȉƤƇǳ g٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ׇɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ vƲƲƫǕƇǼ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 0.5 ¯ɅƇɅƲ j٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ׇɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ vƲƲƫǕƇǼ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ 0.4 ¯ɅƇɅƲ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ־ׅ #19..
- 490 -
½ǛƲȯ٪UU Mid-Term Recommendations ½ǛƲȯ٪UU٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉɦǾƲƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǼƇǛǾɅƇǛǾƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ƣɍɅ٪ƫǛƫ٪ǾȉɅ٪ȯƲƤƲǛɥƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉƤɍȷƲƫ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾ٪ treatment of Tier I. Speci𿿿cally, these locations focus on transition points that were identi𿿿ed as Representative Locations (tƇȬ٪ֿׂخؘ٪1/2ǕƲȷƲ٪ ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ȯƲǼƇǛǾ٪ƤȯǛɅǛƤƇǳ٪Ʌȉ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉىȷ٪ǳȉǾǍ٪ɅƲȯǼ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ɥǛȷǛȉǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ƣƲ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƲƫ٪Ƈȷ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍؙ٪ƤƇȬƇƤǛɅɬؙ٪ȉȯ٪ƤƇȬǛɅƇǳ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ȉȬȬȉȯɅɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯǛȷƲؘ ½ȉ٪ǍɍǛƫƲ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƇɅ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪Ƈ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅ was created that identi𿿿es common types of segments ƇǾƫ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷؘ٪ÝǛɅǕ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ǛƲȯ٪UU٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣƲɬȉǾƫؙ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅ٪Ǜȷ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƣƲ٪Ƈ٪ƤǛɅɬɦǛƫƲ٪Ʌȉȉǳؙ٪ƲǾƇƣǳǛǾǍ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ Ʌȉ٪ƇȬȬǳɬ٪ƲɥǛƫƲǾƤƲعƣƇȷƲƫ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ƇƤȯȉȷȷ٪ȷǛǼǛǳƇȯ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ ɅɬȬƲȷؙ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǾɬɦǕƲȯƲ٪ƲǳȷƲ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤǛɅɬؙ٪ with adjustments to re˛ect local conditions. Additional detail on the ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉǳǳȉɦǛǾǍ٪ȷƲƤɅǛȉǾؘ٪tȉȯƲ٪ǛǾǌȉȯǼƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǾ٪½ǛƲȯ٪ UU٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲǛȯ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǌȉɍǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪Uؚ٪ ½ǛƲȯ٪UU٪§ƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪tƲǼȉȯƇǾƫɍǼؘ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׆־ #19..
- 491 -
Map 14 • ½ǛƲȯ٪UU -ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ȉǾ٪
ǛɅɬعǼƇǾƇǍƲƫ٪¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪
ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ־ׇ #19..
- 492 -
½ǛƲȯ٪UUU jȉǾǍƲȯع1/2ƲȯǼ٪ Recommendations ½ǛƲȯ٪UUU٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ٪ƫǛȯƲƤɅǳɬ٪ ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳǳƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ɅǕƲɬ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅǛƲȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅ٪ƣƲƤƇɍȷƲ٪ ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲǛȯ٪ƤȉǳǳǛȷǛȉǾ٪ȬƇɅɅƲȯǾȷؙ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ ƤǕƇȯƇƤɅƲȯǛȷɅǛƤȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȉȯɅƇǾƤƲؘ٪ ½ǕƲȷƲ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ȯƲƤƲǛɥƲƫ٪ǕǛǍǕعǳƲɥƲǳ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ٪½ƇƣǳƲ٪ֿֿ٪ǳǛȷɅȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƲǛǍǕɅ٪ ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅǛƲȯ٪ƇǾƫ٪½ƇƣǳƲ٪ֿ׀٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ƲǛǍǕɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɍǾƫƲȯ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅǛƲȯؘ٪ƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ ǛǾǌȉȯǼƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǾ٪½ǛƲȯ٪UUU٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ ǛǾ٪ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪eؚ٪½ǛƲȯ٪UUU٪§ƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ tƲǼȉȯƇǾƫɍǼؘ ƲƤƇɍȷƲ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǾ٪¯ɅƇɅƲ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷ٪ ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ƤȉȉȯƫǛǾƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ƲɫȬƲƤɅƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ǼȉɥƲ٪ǌȉȯɦƇȯƫ٪ȉǾ٪ ɅǕƲǛȯ٪ȉɦǾ٪ɅǛǼƲǳǛǾƲؘ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ƤȉǾɅǛǾɍƲ٪ Ʌȉ٪ƤȉǳǳƇƣȉȯƇɅƲ٪ƤǳȉȷƲǳɬ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ ƇƤɅǛɥǛɅǛƲȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ǬȉǛǾɅ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇɍƫǛɅȷؙ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅ٪ ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǼƲǾɅؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ to advance shared Vision Zero goals. Table 11 • ½ǛƲȯ٪UUU٪ ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ Table 12 • ½ǛƲȯ٪UUU UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ
ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ FȯȉǼ ½ȉ SR 108/K Street ֿֿɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ֿׂɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ SR 108/McHenry Avenue ȯǛǍǍȷǼȉȯƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ GȯƇǾǍƲȯ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ SR 108/McHenry Avenue ¯ɅƇǾƫǛǌȉȯƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ع̄ɬǳɥƇǾ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ Ýȉȉƫȯȉɦ٪ɥƲǾɍƲع§ȉƣǛǾ٪ Oȉȉƫ٪%ȯǛɥƲ ¯§٪ֿׁإ׀tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ½ȯƇȷǯ٪jƇǾƲ٪ §ǛɥƲȯȷǛƫƲ٪%ȯǛɥƲ ȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛǾǍ٪§ȉƇƫɦƇɬ SR 108/McHenry Avenue tƲǛǳɬ٪ÝƇɬ SR 108/McHenry Avenue tȉȯȯǛȷ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ SR 108/McHenry Avenue ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ SR 108/Needham Street 15th Street SR 108/Needham Street SR 108/McHenry Avenue and 17th Street ¯§٪ֿׁإ׀ׇɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ٪ g٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ¯§٪ֿׁإ׀ãȉȷƲǼǛɅƲ٪ ȉɍǳƲɥƇȯƫ٪ ¯§٪ֿׁإ׀%٪̄ɅȯƲƲɅ ¯§٪ֿׁإ׀ãȉȷƲǼǛɅƲ٪
ȉɍǳƲɥƇȯƫ El Vista Avenue/Mitchell Road ֿֿ־
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 493 -
Systemic Safety Blueprint The Tier 1–3 recommendations offer an extensive set of engineering strategies to address many ȉǌ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉىȷ٪ǼȉȷɅ٪ƤȯǛɅǛƤƇǳ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤǕƇǳǳƲǾǍƲȷؘ٪OȉɦƲɥƲȯؙ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǳȉǾƲ٪ cannot fully meet Modesto’s current or future safety needs. To further advance Modesto’s Vision Zero goals, a ¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅ٪ɦƇȷ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ǍɍǛƫƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȯƲƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ safety improvements, using the same Safe System design principles applied in the Tier 1–3 ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ The Blueprint identi𿿿es typical intersection and street segment con𿿿gurations along the city’s ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ǾƲɅɦȉȯǯؘ׀ׂ These typologies are de𿿿ned primarily by number of lanes, median type, and ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳؘ٪Fȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؙ٪Ƈ٪ȷǕȉȯɅǳǛȷɅ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ǕƲǳȬȷ٪ƇƫƫȯƲȷȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ issues commonly observed in that con𿿿guration, with tables providing crash reduction factors ح§ Fȷخ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲؘ25٪½ȉ٪ƣƲɅɅƲȯ٪ɍǾƫƲȯȷɅƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ ȬȯȉƤƲȷȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ɅȯƲƇɅǼƲǾɅؙ٪ȬǳƲƇȷƲ٪ȯƲǌƲȯ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪Fؚ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪ ¯ƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪GɍǛƫƇǾƤƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪½ȉȉǳƣȉɫؘ٪Ǿ٪ƲɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪Ǜȷ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ǕǛǍǕǳǛǍǕɅƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪Ʌȉ٪ ǛǳǳɍȷɅȯƇɅƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳ٪ƤȉǾƫǛɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǾƲƲƫȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇƣǳƲ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷؘ ½ȉǍƲɅǕƲȯؙ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ƲǳƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ǌȉȯǼ٪Ƈ٪ȯƲȬǳǛƤƇƣǳƲ٪نƣǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅه٪ɅǕƇɅ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ƤƇǾ٪ɍȷƲ٪Ƈȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷɅƇȯɅǛǾǍ٪ȬȉǛǾɅ٪ ǌȉȯ٪ƇƫƫȯƲȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȯǾȷ٪ƇȷȷȉƤǛƇɅƲƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ƤȉǼǼȉǾ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅ٪ɅɬȬƲȷؘ٪ The lists below summarize the intersection and segment typologies along the priority corridors, ǌȉǳǳȉɦƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅǛǾǍ٪ƲɫǛȷɅǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǾƫǛɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪Ʌȉ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǳɍƲȬȯǛǾɅؘ ׀ׂ٪
ƲƤƇɍȷƲ٪ȉǌ٪ǛɅȷ٪ǛǾɅȯǛƤƇɅƲ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƫǛȷɅǛǾƤɅǛɥƲ٪ǳƇǾƫ٪ɍȷƲ٪ȬƇɅɅƲȯǾȷؙ٪%ȉɦǾɅȉɦǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ɦƇȷ٪ ƲɫƤǳɍƫƲƫ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ɅǕƲ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǼƲǾɅ٪ȬȯȉƤƲȷȷؘ 25 A CRF is a percentage estimate of how much a safety countermeasure is expected to reduce crashes at a speci𿿿c site, developed through analysis of past crash data and documented outcomes from similar ɅȯƲƇɅǼƲǾɅȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯɬ٪ȷȉɍȯƤƲȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ §Fȷ٪ɍȷƲƫ٪ɦƲȯƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪FƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪OǛǍǕɦƇɬ٪ƫǼǛǾǛȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ حFOÝخ٪¤ȯȉɥƲǾ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ȉȯ٪
ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷ٪jȉƤƇǳ٪§ȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪tƇǾɍƇǳؘ٪
ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪
§Fȷ٪ǛǾƫǛƤƇɅƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯƲȷƲƇȯƤǕ٪ǕƇȷ٪ǾȉɅ٪ƣƲƲǾ٪ȬƲȯǌȉȯǼƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪Ƈ٪ȯƲǳǛƇƣǳƲ٪ƲȷɅǛǼƇɅƲ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȯƇȷǕ٪ ȯƲƫɍƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȯƇɅƲȷ؛٪ǕȉɦƲɥƲȯؙ٪ǼƲƇǾǛǾǍǌɍǳ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǳǛǯƲǳɬؘ٪ Intersection Typologies UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ (Signalized) UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪½ɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ (Unsignalized) UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪½ɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ (Signalized) UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ Two-lane Road (Unsignalized) UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ Two-lane Road (Signalized) UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪¯ǛɫعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ Four-lane Road (Signalized) ¯ƲǍǼƲǾɅ٪½ɬȬȉǳȉǍǛƲȷ ½ɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ ½ɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ ½ɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ ½ɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ ½ɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲؙ٪ǳȉɦƲȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲ FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪½ɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ ǳƇǾƲؙ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲ FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾؙ٪ ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲ ֿֿֿ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 494 -
Intersection of Four-lane Roads ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪
v%U½Uv¯ A signalized intersection between a four-lane road and another ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ƤȉǼǼƲȯƤǛƇǳؙ٪ ǼǛɫƲƫعɍȷƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǼƲǾɅؘ٪ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ǼƇɬ٪ȯɍǾ٪ƇǳȉǾǍ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬƲ٪ȉǌ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ may have multiple left turn lanes, intersection channelization, channelized right turn lanes, protected-only traf𿿿c signal phasing ǌȉȯ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ǳȉǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ƫǛȷɅƇǾƤƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǳǛǼǛɅƲƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇƤƤȉǼǼȉƫƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ
ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇɅ٪¯ɬǳɥƇǾ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ֿ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯǛǳɬ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅƲ٪ǼȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ ƫǛǌǌƲȯƲǾɅ٪ȬƇȯɅȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤǛɅɬؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǳȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ con˛icts between modes or between vehicles to reduce the risk of broadside collisions, and to reduce con˛icts between vehicles and vulnerable users. ½ȉ٪ƫȉ٪ȷȉؙ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǼƇƫƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȉƇǳ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ȯƲƫعǳǛǍǕɅ٪ ȯɍǾǾǛǾǍ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ ɍȷƲȯȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅȷؘ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅǛǾǍ٪ Ƈ٪ǳƲƇƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳؙ٪ƇƫƫǛǾǍ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥǛǾǍ٪ ȷǛǍǾƇǳ٪ɅǛǼǛǾǍ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬؙ٪ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǌȯǛƤɅǛȉǾؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼƇȯǯǛǾǍȷ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ƣƲ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƲƫ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ǌƲƇȷǛƣǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ٪ƇǳȯƲƇƫɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% ¤ȯȉɅƲƤɅƲƫ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ jƲƇƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾإƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 60% ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȯƲǌɍǍƲ٪ǛȷǳƇǾƫȷ 45% §ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉǾ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷ 25% ãƲǳǳȉɦ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳعȯƲƫ٪ƤǳƲƇȯƇǾƤƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 15% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǌȯǛƤɅǛȉǾ 55% ¯ȬƲƲƫ٪ǌƲƲƫƣƇƤǯ٪ȷǛǍǾȷ 30% Re˛ective backplates 15% ֿֿ׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 495 -
Protected intersection Install protected intersection elements to reduce conflicts between vehicles and bikes. Speed feedback signs Consider installing speed feedback signs upstream or downstream of the intersection. Update pavement markings Install wet-reflective striping with raised pavement markers (RPMs) in place of existing Botts’ dots markers. Signal timing and visibility improvements Evaluate adjustment to yellow change or all-red clearance interval, and install any of the following if missing: leading pedestrian interval, countdown timers, reflective signal backplates, additional signal heads. C O F F E E R D S Y L V A N A V E Upgrade protection level of bike lane Upgrade existing bike lane (Class II) to buffered bike lanes (buffered Class II) or separated bike lane (Class IV). Upgrade protection level of bike lane Upgrade existing bike lane (Class II) to separated bike lane (Class IV). Narrow the width of vehicle lanes Narrow lanes where feasible. Upgrade to separated bikeway (Class IV). Upgrade protection level of bike lane COFFEE RD AT SYLVAN AVE 0 25 50 75 100 FEET Linear / Spot Recommendations Speed Management Conflict Management Improve RedundancyTypology 1 Example Map 15 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪ ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇɅ٪¯ɬǳɥƇǾ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿֿׁ #19..
- 496 -
Intersection of Two-lane Roads حÄǾȷǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ An unsignalized intersection between a two-lane road and ƇǾȉɅǕƲȯ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ȉȯ٪ǳȉɦƲȯعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ƤȉǼǼƲȯƤǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȯǛǾǍƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ɍȯƣƇǾ٪ƤȉȯƲؘ٪½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ǼƇɬ٪ȯɍǾ٪ƇǳȉǾǍ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؘ٪¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ٪ ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ٪ǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ȉǾƲ٪ ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬƲ٪ȉǌ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪Ǜȷ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȷɅȉȬعƤȉǾɅȯȉǳǳƲƫؙ٪ with some intersections with higher traf𿿿c volumes having all- ɦƇɬ٪ȷɅȉȬ٪ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳؘ٪UǾ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾؙ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ǼƇȯǯƲƫ٪ ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳǛǼǛɅƲƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇƤƤȉǼǼȉƫƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ٪ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅɅƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƇǾ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕؙ٪ȯƲƫ٪ȬƇǛǾɅƲƫ٪ Ƥɍȯƣȷ٪ȬȯȉǕǛƣǛɅǛǾǍ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ƫƇɬǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ٪ȉǌ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǕɬȷǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ٪ Ǜȷ٪ɍǾƤȉǼǼȉǾؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ F٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ֿֿɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪׀ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯǛǳɬ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅƲ٪ǼȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫȷؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛǯǛǾǍؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ minimize con˛icts between vehicles and vulnerable users and reduce con˛icts between turning vehicles in different directions to reduce broadside ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؘ٪½ȉ٪ƫȉ٪ȷȉؙ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǼƇƫƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȉƇǳ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳȉɦǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ɍȷƲȯȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅȷؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ Traf𿿿c calming – speed cushions 50% §ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ 35% §ȉƇƫإǳƇǾƲ٪ƫǛƲɅ 35% Area-wide traf𿿿c calming ֿֿڤ§ ȉɍǾƫƇƣȉɍɅ Varies Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ %ƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ 35% ƲɫƤǳɍƫƲȷڑ Ƈǳǳ٧ɦƇɬڑȷɅȉȬڑ ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ ¯ɅȯǛȬƲƫ٪ȉȯ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ح ǳƇȷȷ٪UUخ 35% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ ¯ɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǍƲ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ 15% ֿֿׂ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 497 -
Lorem ipsum Curb Extension Add curb extensions to all corners to reduce crossing distances for pedestrians. Signing and marking Add stop signs on both sides of road within curb extensions. Add "ALL WAY" plaque underneath stop signs where missing. 1 1 T H S T F S T Narrow the width of vehicle lanes Narrow the width of vehicle lanes. Add traffic calming to the corridor, including speed tables or cushions, raised crosswalks, and bulbouts. Upgrade protection level of bike lane Add bike lanes (Class II) in each direction. Alternative: Roundabout Raised intersection Install raised intersection to slow vehicles. Alternative: Upgrade intersection to mini or urban compact roundabout. Consider using modular materials to reduce cost. Add shared lane (Class III) markings in roundabout to guide bicycles. F ST AT 11TH ST 0 25 50 FEET Linear / Spot Recommendations Typology 2 Example Speed Management Conflict Management Improve Redundancy Map 16 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪حÄǾȷǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪F٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ֿֿɅǕ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿֿ׃ #19..
- 498 -
Intersection of Two-lane Roads ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪
v%U½Uv¯ A signalized intersection between a two-lane road and another ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؘ٪ ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ٪ ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ɦǛƫƲȯ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ȉȯ٪ȉǾ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ɍǾƫƲȯǍȉǾƲ٪ Ƈ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ƫǛƲɅ٪ȉȯ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȯƲȬɍȯȬȉȷǛǾǍؘ٪ǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؘ٪UǾ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾؙ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǳȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳǛǼǛɅƲƫ٪ ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇƤƤȉǼǼȉƫƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ٪٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ ȷǛǍǾƇǳ٪ȬǕƇȷƲ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ƇɅ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷؘ٪ ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅɅƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƇǾ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕؙ٪ȯƲƫ٪ȬƇǛǾɅƲƫ٪Ƥɍȯƣȷ٪ ȬȯȉǕǛƣǛɅǛǾǍ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ƫƇɬǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǕɬȷǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ٪ Ǜȷ٪ɍǾƤȉǼǼȉǾؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ §ȉȷƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇɅ٪
ȉǳǳƲǍƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ׁ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ǕƲ٪ǼƇǛǾ٪ǌɍǾƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪ ɅȯƇɥƲǳǛǾǍ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫȷؘ٪Fȉȯ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪ to reduce con˛icts between vehicles and vulnerable users, and to prevent ƣȯȉƇƫȷǛƫƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƇǾǍǳƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬؘ٪½ȉ٪ƫȉ٪ȷȉؙ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǼƇƫƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȉƇǳ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ȬȯȉɅƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳȉɦǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ɍȷƲȯȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ ȷȬƇƤƲ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅȷؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ Traf𿿿c calming – speed cushions 50% ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% Area-wide traf𿿿c calming ֿֿڤ ¤ȯȉɅƲƤɅƲƫ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ vإ٪ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ jƲƇƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾإƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 60% ɍǌǌƲȯƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ح
ǳƇȷȷ٪UUخ 45% ãƲǳǳȉɦ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳعȯƲƫ٪ƤǳƲƇȯƇǾƤƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 15% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ Re˛ective backplates 15% ֿֿׄ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 499 -
Map 17 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪½ɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪§ȉȷƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇɅ٪ ȉǳǳƲǍƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿֿׅ #19..
- 500 -
Intersection of Four-Lane Road ƇǾƫ٪½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ حÄǾȷǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ An unsignalized intersection between a four-lane road and Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦع٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ residential areas. Because traf𿿿c volumes on the two-lane road ƇȯƲ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ǳȉɦؙ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ȷɅȉȬ٪ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǼȉȷɅ٪ƤȉǼǼȉǾ٪ traf𿿿c control condition. Pedestrian facilities are often present ȉǾ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷؘ٪ ȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ǼƇȯǯƲƫ٪ƇƤȯȉȷȷ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷȉǼƲɅǛǼƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǼƇȯǯƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ ȯȉƇƫؘ٪FƲƇɅɍȯƲȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ȉǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ȉȯ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫؘ٪ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅɅƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƇǾ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕؙ٪ ȯƲƫ٪ȬƇǛǾɅƲƫ٪Ƥɍȯƣȷ٪ȬȯȉǕǛƣǛɅǛǾǍ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ ƫƇɬǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǕɬȷǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ٪Ǜȷ٪ɍǾƤȉǼǼȉǾؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ Orangeburg Avenue at Del Vale Avenue ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ׂ ¤§e- ½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪Ƈȷ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȉǛǾɅȷ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅǛǾǍ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ƤȉǳǳƲƤɅȉȯȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ƇȯɅƲȯǛƇǳȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǼǛɅǛǍƇɅƲ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ȉǌ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǾǍǳƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ȉǌ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ǛǾɥȉǳɥǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؘ٪½ȉ٪ƫȉ٪ȷȉؙ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ ǼƇƫƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȉƇǳ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ ȯȉƇƫؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؙ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅǛǾǍ٪Ƈ٪ȷƇǌƲ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ǌƲƇȷǛƣǳƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳȉɦǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǍȯƲƇɅƲȯ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ɍȷƲȯȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅȷؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ %ǛȯƲƤɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȬƲǾǛǾǍȷ 50% ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% §ȉƇƫإǳƇǾƲ٪ƫǛƲɅ 35% Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȯƲǌɍǍƲ٪ǛȷǳƇǾƫȷ 45% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% %ƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ 35% Rectangular rapid٪˛ashing beacon (RRFB) 35% ȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷ 25% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ Bicycle con˛ict markings vإ ֿֿ׆ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 501 -
Map 18 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪حÄǾȷǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇɅ٪%Ʋǳ٪ÜƇǳƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ׇֿֿ #19..
- 502 -
Intersection of Four-Lane Road ƇǾƫ٪½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ A signalized intersection between a four-lane road and a two-lane ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦع٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؙ٪ ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ƤȉǼǼƲȯƤǛƇǳ٪ȬȯȉȬƲȯɅǛƲȷؘ٪½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ǼƇɬ٪ ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؘ٪¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷؘ٪ ȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ǼƇȯǯƲƫؘ٪
ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȯȉƇƫȷؘ٪FƲƇɅɍȯƲȷ٪ ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǳ٪ ȬǕƇȷƲȷ٪حɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɅƲƤɅƲƫعȬƲȯǼǛȷȷǛɥƲ٪ȬǕƇȷǛǾǍخؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ ½ɍǳǳɬ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇɅ٪§ȉȷƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪׃ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪Ƈȷ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȉǛǾɅȷ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅǛǾǍ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ƤȉǳǳƲƤɅȉȯȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ƇȯɅƲȯǛƇǳȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƇɅ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƇǾƇǍƲ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪Ʌɦȉ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ ɅɬȬƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ȉǌ٪ƇǾǍǳƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ȉȯ٪ȯƲƫعǳǛǍǕɅ٪ȯɍǾǾǛǾǍ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ to minimize con˛icts among different travel directions and different travel ǼȉƫƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ƣȯȉƇƫȷǛƫƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؘ٪½ȉ٪ƫȉ٪ȷȉؙ٪ recommendations are tailored to minimize vehicle approach speeds, provide ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ǼȉƫƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȉɅƲǾɅǛƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƇǳǳȉƤƇɅƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ Traf𿿿c calming – speed cushions 50% ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% §ȉƇƫإǳƇǾƲ٪ƫǛƲɅ 35% Area-wide traf𿿿c calming ֿֿڤ§ ȉɍǾƫƇƣȉɍɅ Varies Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ jƲƇƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾإƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 60% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% ãƲǳǳȉɦ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǳعȯƲƫ٪ƤǳƲƇȯƇǾƤƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 15% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ Re˛ective backplates 15% ֿ־׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 503 -
Map 19 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪1/2ɍǳǳɬ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇɅ٪§ȉȷƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׀ֿ #19..
- 504 -
Intersection of Six-Lane Road ƇǾƫ٪FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ A signalized intersection between a six-lane road and at four-lane ȯȉƇƫ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ǳƇǾƫ٪ɍȷƲȷ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷǕȉȬȬǛǾǍ٪ centers, or in areas with shopping plazas on multiple corners. ȉɅǕ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ɅȯɍƤǯ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷؘ٪¯ȬƲƲƫ٪ǳǛǼǛɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ traf𿿿c volumes are usually high for both roads. Sidewalks are ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؘ٪ ȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼȉȯƲ٪ ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷ٪ȬȉɅƲǾɅǛƇǳǳɬ٪ǕƇɥǛǾǍ٪Ƈ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǕǛƣǛɅǛȉǾؘ٪ ǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬƲ٪ȉǌ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ ǼɍǳɅǛȬǳƲ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ƫƲƫǛƤƇɅƲƫ٪ȯǛǍǕɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲȷؙ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ channelization, channelized right turn lanes, protected-only traf𿿿c signal phasing for left turning vehicles, long pedestrian ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ƫǛȷɅƇǾƤƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳǛǼǛɅƲƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇƤƤȉǼǼȉƫƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ
ȯǛǍǍȷǼȉȯƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇɅ٪¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ׄ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯǛǳɬ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅƲ٪ǳȉǾǍƲȯعƫǛȷɅƇǾƤƲ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤǛɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǛǾǍ٪ƤǛɅǛƲȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƇɅ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǳ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ƇǕƲƇƫ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǛǼƲ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȯƲƇȯ٪ƲǾƫ٪ȉȯ٪ȯƲƫعǳǛǍǕɅ٪ȯɍǾǾǛǾǍ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؙ٪Ƈȷ٪ɦƲǳǳ٪Ƈȷ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ spatial and temporal separation to reduce con˛icts between vehicles and ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؘ٪§ƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ǌȉƤɍȷ٪ȉǾ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉǌ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ƇƫǬɍȷɅǛǾǍ٪ ȷǛǍǾƇǳ٪ɅǛǼǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲȯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ Modify or remove channelized right turn ȷǳǛȬ٪ǳƇǾƲ ׂׂڤ ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% ¤ȯȉɅƲƤɅƲƫ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ jƲƇƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾإƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƇǳȷ 60% ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȯƲǌɍǍƲ٪ǛȷǳƇǾƫȷ 45% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% vȉ٪ȯǛǍǕɅ٪ȉǾ٪ȯƲƫ ڤ׀٪Ʌȉ٪ڤ׆ ٛƫƲȬƲǾƫǛǾǍڑ ȉǾڑǾɍǼƣƲȯڑȉǌڑ ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕƲȷڑ ɦǛɅǕڑȬȯȉǕǛƣǛɅǛȉǾٜ UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ Advance٪˛ashing beacon warning signs 30% ֿ׀׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 505 -
Map 20 • UǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪¯ǛɫعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ح̄ǛǍǾƇǳǛɶƲƫخ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪ ȯǛǍǍȷǼȉȯƲ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇɅ٪¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׀ׁ #19..
- 506 -
½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪Ƈ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦع٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؙ٪ Ƈȷ٪ɦƲǳǳ٪Ƈȷ٪ǛǾ٪ƫȉɦǾɅȉɦǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯǛǳɬ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪ɦǛɅǕǛǾ٪ɅǕƲǛȯ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫȷؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬƲ٪ȉǌ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ƫȉƲȷ٪ǾȉɅ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ separation for turning vehicles, which can in˛uence traf𿿿c٪˛ow ƇǾƫ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬƲ٪ȉǌ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ǼƇɬ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪Ƈȷ٪Ƈ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȯȉɍɅƲؘ٪ ǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯȉƇƫؘ٪ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؙ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍȷ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ ǯƲɬ٪ƫƲȷɅǛǾƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ȉȯ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȷɅȉȬȷؘ٪ ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؘ٪OǛǍǕƲȯ٪ǌɍǾƤɅǛȉǾǛǾǍ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ Fǳȉɬƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǯƫƇǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ׅ ¤§e- ½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǳɬ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯɬ٪ priority. This reduces con˛icts between vehicles and crossing users, as well Ƈȷ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƇȯ٪ƲǾƫ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ƣɬ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ȷɅȉȬȬǛǾǍ٪ƫǛȷɅƇǾƤƲ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥǛǾǍ٪ȷǛǍǕɅ٪ƫǛȷɅƇǾƤƲؘ٪ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇɥƇǛǳƇƣǳƲؙ٪ɦǛƫƲȯ٪ ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؘ٪Uǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȉǾɅƲɫɅ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇȬȬȯȉȬȯǛƇɅƲؙ٪ɥƲȯɅǛƤƇǳ٪ traf𿿿c calming elements or raised crosswalks should be considered. ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% Area-wide traf𿿿c calming ֿֿڤ1/2 ȯƇɥƲǳ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǾƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯ 80% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% Install rapid rectangular٪˛ashing ƣƲƇƤȉǾ٪ح§§F خ 35%§ ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ 35% ¯ɅȯǛȬƲƫ٪ȉȯ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ح ǳƇȷȷ٪UUخ 35% ֿ׀ׂ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 507 -
Map 21 • ½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ÝǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪Fǳȉɬƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǯƫƇǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׃׀ #19..
- 508 -
½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦع٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؙ٪Ƈȷ٪ɦƲǳǳ٪Ƈȷ٪ ǛǾ٪ƫȉɦǾɅȉɦǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ɦǕǛƤǕ٪ can improve traf𿿿c٪˛ow, reduce vehicle speeds, and enhance ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅؘ٪ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯ٪ǍƇȬȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ǛǾ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ǌɍȯɅǕƲȯ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ƫȉɦǾɅȉɦǾؘ٪ tǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ƇɅ٪ƤƲȯɅƇǛǾ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ٪OǛǍǕƲȯ٪ ǌɍǾƤɅǛȉǾǛǾǍ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ ¯ƤƲǾǛƤ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪¯ȉǾȉǼƇ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪jƇǯƲɦȉȉƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪׆ ¤§e- ½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅƇɅƲ٪ȷƇǌƲ٪ǼȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ ǌȉȯ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯɬ٪ ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬؘ٪ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇɥƇǛǳƇƣǳƲؙ٪ɦǛƫƲȯ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ ǌȉȯ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؘ٪UǾ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ǾǛǍǕɅعɅǛǼƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؙ٪ǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ ȬȯȉȬȉȷƲƫؘ٪vƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ٪ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ǌɍȯɅǕƲȯ٪ǕƲǳȬȷ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬƇȯɅǛƤɍǳƇȯǳɬ٪Ǜǌ٪ȬƇǛȯƲƫ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ƇƫƫǛǾǍ٪ȉȯ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉɅƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪Ƈ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ɦǛƫƲǾǛǾǍ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯؘ٪ UǾ٪ƤƲȯɅƇǛǾ٪ƤǛȯƤɍǼȷɅƇǾƤƲȷؙ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ƤƇǳǼǛǾǍ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ɥƲȯɅǛƤƇǳ٪ ƲǳƲǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ǍƇɅƲɦƇɬȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ǌƲƲƫƣƇƤǯ٪ȷǛǍǾȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȷɍǛɅƇƣǳƲؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ Area-wide traf𿿿c calming ֿֿڤ1/2 ȯƇɥƲǳ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǾƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯ 80% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ jǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ 35% ¯ȬƲƲƫ٪ǌƲƲƫƣƇƤǯ٪ȷǛǍǾȷ 30% ֿ׀ׄ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 509 -
Map 22 • ½ɦȉعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪̄ƤƲǾǛƤ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪¯ȉǾȉǼƇ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪jƇǯƲɦȉȉƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׀ׅ #19..
- 510 -
FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɦǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǳȉɦع٪Ʌȉ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼǛɫƲƫع ɍȷƲ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƫǛɥƲȯȷƲ٪ȬǳƇƤƲ٪ɅɬȬƲȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪ ɍȷǛǾǍ٪Ƈ٪ɥƇȯǛƲɅɬ٪ȉǌ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ǼȉƫƲȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ƫȉ٪ǾȉɅ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪ additional separation for turning vehicles, which can in˛uence traf𿿿c٪˛ow and lead to a risk of head-on and sideswipe crashes. In addition, roadways with this typology may have higher traf𿿿c ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲȷ٪Ƈȷ٪ɅǕƲɬ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ƇȯɅƲȯǛƇǳ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷؘ٪ ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؙ٪ƣɍɅ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ǳƇƤǯ٪ɥƲȯɅǛƤƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾؘ٪ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬؘ٪ If midblock crossings are provided, they usually require traf𿿿c control devices including a pedestrian hybrid beacon, traf𿿿c signal, or٪˛ashing beacon. On-street parking is typically present ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯȉƇƫؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪§ȉȉȷƲɥƲǳɅ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪
ƇȯɥƲȯ٪§ȉƇƫ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ׇ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǳɬ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯɬ٪ ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬؘ٪ÝǕƲȯƲ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇɥƇǛǳƇƣǳƲؙ٪ɦǛƫƲȯ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉɅƲƤɅƲƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƇƤƤƲȷȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؘ٪Ʌ٪ǯƲɬ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǌȯȉǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷ٪ ȉȯ٪ɅȯƇǛǳȷؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪ȷƇǌƲ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍ٪ȉȬȬȉȯɅɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ bicyclists where feasible. If traf𿿿c volumes are low, evaluate a road diet ƤȉǾɥƲȯȷǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪Ƥȯȉȷȷ٪ȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ؛٪ if traf𿿿c volumes are high enough to preclude a road diet, consider adding a narrow raised median as space allows to reduce the risk for head-on con˛icts ƇǾƫ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ȷǛƫƲ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷؘ٪Uǌ٪ƤƲǾɅƲȯǳǛǾƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲƫǍƲ٪ǳǛǾƲ٪ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ markings are not present, faded, non-re˛ective, or if raised Botts’ dots are used, replace them with wet-re˛ective pavement markings. ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ 35% §ȉƇƫإǳƇǾƲ٪ƫǛƲɅ 35% Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯ 80% ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǕɬƣȯǛƫ٪ƣƲƇƤȉǾ٪حOÝgخ 55% ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȯƲǌɍǍƲ٪ǛȷǳƇǾƫȷ 45% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% §ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ 25% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ ¯ɅȯǛȬǛǾǍ 20% ֿ׆׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 511 -
Map 23 • FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ÝǛɅǕȉɍɅ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪ȯƇǾǍƲƣɍȯǍ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪§ȉȉȷƲɥƲǳɅ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƇȯɥƲȯ٪§ȉƇƫ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿ׀ׇ #19..
- 512 -
FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ٪حjȉɦƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼǛɫƲƫعɍȷƲ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؘ٪ ½ǕƲ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ turning vehicles, which can improve traf𿿿c٪˛ow and reduce the ȯǛȷǯ٪ȉǌ٪ȯƲƇȯ٪ƲǾƫ٪ȉȯ٪ȷǛƫƲȷɦǛȬƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؘ٪Uǌ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƇǾ٪ƲɫǛȷɅǛǾǍ٪ȯƇǛȷƲƫ٪ ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳǛǾǍ٪ ǛǾ٪ƫǛǌǌƲȯƲǾɅ٪ƫǛȯƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǕƲǳȬȷ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾȷ٪ƇƤȯȉȷȷ٪ǼɍǳɅǛȬǳƲ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ƫȯǛɥƲɦƇɬȷؘ٪§ȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǳȉɦƲȯ٪ ɥȉǳɍǼƲؙ٪ɦǕǛƤǕ٪ǼƇɬ٪ȬƲȯǼǛɅ٪ȯƲƇǳǳȉƤƇɅǛǾǍ٪ȉǾƲ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǛǾ٪ƲƇƤǕ٪ ƫǛȯƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ǼȉƫƲȷؘ٪ ƲƤƇɍȷƲ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ƲɫƤƲȷȷ٪ƤƇȬƇƤǛɅɬؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƲǾƤȉɍȯƇǍƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷؙ٪ȬƇȯɅǛƤɍǳƇȯǳɬ٪ƫɍȯǛǾǍ٪ȉǌǌع ȬƲƇǯ٪Ǖȉɍȯȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ƣƲ٪ȷƲȯɥƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪Ƈ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȯȉɍɅƲ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪Ƈ٪ɅȯɍƤǯ٪ȯȉɍɅƲؘ٪ ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؙ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯ٪Ƈȷ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ƈǳǳȉɦȷؘ٪ǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ ǛǾ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ Prescott Road between Rumble Road and Mount Vernon Drive ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ֿ־ ¤§e- ½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǳɬ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǳƇƤƲȷ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ȷƲȯɥǛǾǍ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ reduce vehicle travel speeds and reduce risk of con˛icts between vehicles ƇǾƫ٪ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؙ٪ȬƇȯɅǛƤɍǳƇȯǳɬ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȷɅȉȬȷؘ٪vƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ٪ɦǛƫƲ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɦǛƫƲǾǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ speeds and reduce the risk of con˛icts between vehicles and bicyclists. At ǯƲɬ٪ǼǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǌȯȉǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷؙ٪ɅȯƇǛǳȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȷɅȉȬȷؙ٪ install٪˛ashing beacons or hybrid beacons to facilitate a safe crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists to those destinations, where feasible. If traf𿿿c ɥȉǳɍǼƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǳȉɦؙ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅƲ٪Ƈ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ƫǛƲɅ٪ƤȉǾɥƲȯȷǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعǳƇǾƲ٪Ƥȯȉȷȷ٪ȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾؘ٪ ȉǾȷǛƫƲȯ٪ƇƫƫǛǾǍ٪Ƈ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪ intersection channelization as space allows to reduce the risk for head-on con˛icts and left turn crashes from side streets. If centerline and edge line pavement markings are not present, faded, or non-re˛ective, or if raised Botts’ dots are used, replace them with wet-re˛ective pavement markings. ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ §ȉƇƫإǳƇǾƲ٪ƫǛƲɅ 35% ½ȯƇɥƲǳ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǾƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǕɬƣȯǛƫ٪ƣƲƇƤȉǾ٪حOÝgخ 55% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% Install rapid rectangular٪˛ashing beacon (RRFB) 35% §ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ 25% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ ¯ɅȯǛȬǛǾǍ 20% ֿׁ־ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 513 -
Map 24 • FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȉȯ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲؙ٪jȉɦƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪§ɍǼƣǳƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪tȉɍǾɅ٪ÜƲȯǾȉǾ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿֿׁ #19..
- 514 -
FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲ٪حOǛǍǕƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲخ -âU¯½UvG٪ v%U½Uv¯ ٪ǌȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯȷ٪ ǛǾ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼǛɫƲƫعɍȷƲ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ ɅɦȉعɦƇɬ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ vehicles, which can improve traf𿿿c٪˛ow and reduce the risk of rear ƲǾƫ٪ȉȯ٪ȷǛƫƲȷɦǛȬƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؘ٪Uǌ٪ȬȯƲȷƲǾɅؙ٪ƇǾ٪ƲɫǛȷɅǛǾǍ٪ȯƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳǛǾǍ٪ǛǾ٪ ƫǛǌǌƲȯƲǾɅ٪ƫǛȯƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǕƲǳȬȷ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾȷ٪ƇƤȯȉȷȷ٪ǼɍǳɅǛȬǳƲ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ƫȯǛɥƲɦƇɬȷؘ٪§ȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ traf𿿿c volumes or other operational characteristics that preclude ǳƇǾƲ٪ȯƲƫɍƤɅǛȉǾؘ٪½ǕƲɬ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷؙ٪ɅȯɍƤǯ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕؘ٪ ¯ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷؘ٪ ǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؙ٪ɦǕǛƤǕ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ȷɅȯǛȬƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ح ǳƇȷȷ٪UUخ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ ȷɅȯǛȬƲƫ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯ٪Ƈȷ٪ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ƈǳǳȉɦȷؘ٪ǾعȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ ǛǾ٪ǼȉȯƲ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ȉǾ٪ȉǾƲ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯȉƇƫؘ٪tǛƫƣǳȉƤǯ٪ ƤȯȉȷȷǛǾǍȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǾȉɅ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؙ٪ƲɫƤƲȬɅ٪ƇɅ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ƇƤɅǛɥǛɅɬ٪ locations where additional traf𿿿c control such as a pedestrian hybrid beacon or traf𿿿c signal would be necessary; otherwise, pedestrian crossings are provided at signalized intersections. -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ ¯ɬǳɥƇǾ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪
ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ֿֿ ¤§e-
½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǳɬ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬǳƇƤƲȷ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ȷƲȯɥǛǾǍ٪ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǕȉȉƫ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǾƤȯƲƇȷƲ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅȷؘ٪Ʌ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷؙ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ƣƲ٪ ƇƫƫƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷǳȉɦ٪ɅɍȯǾǛǾǍ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؘ٪vƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɍȬƫƇɅǛǾǍ٪ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǼƇȯǯǛǾǍȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲǼȉɥƲ٪ƲɫǛȷɅǛǾǍ٪ȯƇǛȷƲƫ٪ƫȉɅ٪ markers (Botts’ dots) and replace them with re˛ective striping and raised ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǼƇȯǯƲȯȷ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ɥǛȷǛƣǛǳǛɅɬؘ٪§ƲƇǳǳȉƤƇɅǛǾǍ٪ ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪Ƈ٪ɦǛƫƲȯ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ ǼȉɥǛǾǍ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪Ʌȉ٪ƣƲ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȉɍɅȷǛƫƲ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲؙ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ and the risk of con˛icts between vehicles and vulnerable road users. Adding Ƈ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ƤƇǾ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷؙ٪ƲȷȬƲƤǛƇǳǳɬ٪ǛǾ٪ƤȉǼǼƲȯƤǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ driveway con˛icts are high and the risk of left turn crashes at midblock ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ǜȷ٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ǕǛǍǕؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ٪ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ̄ ȬƲƲƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷ٪ 35% ½ȯƇɥƲǳ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ǾƇȯȯȉɦǛǾǍ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǕɬƣȯǛƫ٪ƣƲƇƤȉǾ٪حOÝgخ 55% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% §ƇǛȷƲƫ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ 25% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ ¯ɅȯǛȬǛǾǍ 20% ֿׁ׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 515 -
Map 25 • FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪½ɦȉعÝƇɬ٪jƲǌɅ٪½ɍȯǾ٪jƇǾƲؙ٪OǛǍǕƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪̄ɬǳɥƇǾ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪tƤOƲǾȯɬ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȉǌǌƲƲ٪§ȉƇƫ٪
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿׁׁ #19..
- 516 -
FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾ٪حOǛǍǕƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲخ -âU¯½UvG٪
v%U½Uv¯ FȉɍȯعǳƇǾƲ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ȉƤƤɍȯ٪ǛǾ٪ǼƲƫǛɍǼعƫƲǾȷǛɅɬ٪ ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅǛƇǳؙ٪ǼǛɫƲƫعɍȷƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǼǼƲȯƤǛƇǳ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ƲɫǛȷɅǛǾǍ٪ȯƇǛȷƲƫ٪ ǼƲƫǛƇǾ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ɅȯƇɥƲǳǛǾǍ٪ ǛǾ٪ƫǛǌǌƲȯƲǾɅ٪ƫǛȯƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǕƲǳȬȷ٪ȬȯƲɥƲǾɅ٪ǳƲǌɅ٪ɅɍȯǾȷ٪ƇƤȯȉȷȷ٪ǼɍǳɅǛȬǳƲ٪ ǳƇǾƲȷ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ƫȯǛɥƲɦƇɬȷؘ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲؙ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ȷȬƲƲƫؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯ٪ǌɍǾƤɅǛȉǾǛǾǍ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ ȷƲȯɥǛǾǍ٪Ƈȷ٪ƇȯɅƲȯǛƇǳȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ɅȯɍƤǯ٪ȯȉɍɅƲȷؙ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ ȯȉɍɅƲȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ƣȉɅǕؘ٪½ǕƲɬ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ȯȉƇƫؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫȷ٪ɅɬȬǛƤƇǳǳɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ȉǾ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ȷǛƫƲȷ٪ ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯȉƇƫؙ٪ȉǌɅƲǾ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ȷɅȯǛȬƲƫ٪ƣɍǌǌƲȯ٪Ʌȉ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƣǛǯƲ٪ǳƇǾƲ٪ from vehicular traf𿿿c, and may feature an adjacent shared use ȬƇɅǕ٪ح ǳƇȷȷ٪U٪ƣǛǯƲɦƇɬخؘ٪1/2ǕƲȷƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ƫȉ٪ǾȉɅ٪ɍȷɍƇǳǳɬ٪ǕƇɥƲ٪ȉǾع ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȬƇȯǯǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫؘ -ât¤j- j ½Uvؚ ¯ɅƇǾƫǛǌȉȯƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪OƇǕǾ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ٪ ½ɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ֿ׀ ¤§e- ½٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯ ½ȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅǛɥƲǳɬ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ ȬƲȉȬǳƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ƣɍȷǛǾƲȷȷƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤǛɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉɍǾɅɬؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ Ǜȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ mitigate the risk of con˛icts. Buffers between the bike lane and vehicles should be upgraded to provide vertical separation (Class IV bikeway) where ǌƲƇȷǛƣǳƲؘ٪Fȉȯ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȷɅ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉȯ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȉǾعȯȉƇƫ٪ ȷȬƇƤƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ƤȉǾȷɅȯƇǛǾƲƫؙ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ƇǾ٪ȉǌǌعȯȉƇƫ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅɬ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈ٪ȷǕƇȯƲƫ٪ɍȷƲ٪ȬƇɅǕ٪ ح ǳƇȷȷ٪U٪ƣǛǯƲɦƇɬخ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƲǾǕƇǾƤƲ٪ǼȉƫƇǳ٪ȷƲȬƇȯƇɅǛȉǾؘ ½ǕƲ٪ɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƣƲǳȉɦ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȷƲǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳǳɬ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇɅ٪ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɅɬȬȉǳȉǍɬؘ The recommendations may vary based on site-speci𿿿c conditions. OǛƲȯƇȯƤǕɬ ȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ
§F %ƲǼƇǾƫ٪ tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪¯ɅȉȬ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ vإ Con˛ict tƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ ¯ǕƇȯƲƫ٪ɍȷƲ٪ȬƇɅǕ٪ح ǳƇȷȷ٪Uخ 80%̄ ǛƫƲɦƇǳǯ 80% Separated bike lane (Class IV) 45% UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ §ƲƫɍǾƫƇǾƤɬ ¯ȬƲƲƫ٪ǌƲƲƫƣƇƤǯ٪ȷǛǍǾȷ 30% ֿׁׂ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 517 -
Map 26 • FȉɍȯعjƇǾƲ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪tƲƫǛƇǾؙ٪OǛǍǕƲȯ٪ÜȉǳɍǼƲ٪-ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ػ٪̄ɅƇǾƫǛǌȉȯƫ٪ɥƲǾɍƲ٪ƣƲɅɦƲƲǾ٪OƇǕǾ٪%ȯǛɥƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪¤ȯƲȷƤȉɅɅ٪§ȉƇƫ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿׁ׃ #19..
- 518 -
Traf𿿿c Safety Campaign ½ȉ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬǳƇǾؙ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ƤǕƇȬɅƲȯ٪ also examines non-infrastructure strategies that in˛uence driver ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯؙ٪ƇɦƇȯƲǾƲȷȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǼȬǳǛƇǾƤƲؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ƇƫɥƇǾƤƲ٪ ɅǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼ٪ȬȯǛǾƤǛȬǳƲ٪ȉǌ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪ÄȷƲȯȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȉƣǬƲƤɅǛɥƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪OɍǼƇǾ٪ Vulnerability, Shared Responsibility, and Proactive Safety, particularly ǌȉȯ٪ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯȷ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷؘ٪-ƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷȉƤǛƇǳ٪ǾȉȯǼǛǾǍ٪ ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȯƲǛǾǌȉȯƤƲ٪ȷƇǌƲ٪ƫȯǛɥǛǾǍ٪ǕƇƣǛɅȷؙ٪ǛǾƤȯƲƇȷƲ٪ƇɅɅƲǾɅǛɥƲǾƲȷȷ٪ ƇȯȉɍǾƫ٪ƤǕǛǳƫȯƲǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌƇǼǛǳǛƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ȷƇǌƲȯ٪ȉɍɅƤȉǼƲȷ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ǳȉǾǍƲȯ٪ ɅƲȯǼ٪ƲǾǍǛǾƲƲȯǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȬǳƇǾǾƲƫ٪ȉȯ٪ƣɍǛǳɅؘ As part of this effort, the City launched the “Let Kids Cross” pilot traf𿿿c safety campaign from April 7 to May 18, 2025. The campaign focused on ǛǼȬȯȉɥǛǾǍ٪ƫȯǛɥƲȯ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯ٪ƇȯȉɍǾƫ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷ٪ƣɬ٪ȯƇǛȷǛǾǍ٪ƇɦƇȯƲǾƲȷȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ƫƇǾǍƲȯȷ٪ȉǌ٪ȷȬƲƲƫǛǾǍ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲǾƤȉɍȯƇǍǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǼȬǳǛƇǾƤƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ٪ǳƇɦȷؘ ½ǕƲ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ȬȯȉǼȉɅƲƫ٪Ƈ٪ƤǳƲƇȯ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷǛǼȬǳƲ٪ǼƲȷȷƇǍƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ȷǳȉɦ٪ƫȉɦǾؙ٪ ȷɅȉȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɦƇɅƤǕ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȷɅɍƫƲǾɅȷ٪ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍ٪ȉȯ٪ƣǛǯǛǾǍ٪ǾƲƇȯ٪ school zones. Through yard signs, posters, digital advertising, interior ƣɍȷ٪ȷǛǍǾƇǍƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ƲǾǍƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ٪ƲɥƲǾɅȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǛǾǛɅǛƇɅǛɥƲ٪ȯƲƇƤǕƲƫ٪ ɅǕȉɍȷƇǾƫȷ٪ȉǌ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƫƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅƲƫ٪Ǖȉɦ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯƇǳ٪ ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪ȬǕɬȷǛƤƇǳ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȯȉɅƲƤɅ٪ ɥɍǳǾƲȯƇƣǳƲ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ɍȷƲȯȷؘ٪ƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ǼƇɅƲȯǛƇǳȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯؙ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǌȉɍǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ Appendix K: Traf𿿿c Safety Campaign Reportؘ ƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪OǛǍǕǳǛǍǕɅȷ Overarching Goal Reduce pedestrian-involved crashes in school zones. Campaign Objectives UǾƤȯƲƇȷƲ٪ƇƫɍǳɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅƲƲǾƇǍƲ٪ƫȯǛɥƲȯ٪ƤȉǼȬǳǛƇǾƤƲ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ǳǛǼǛɅȷ UǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ƇɦƇȯƲǾƲȷȷ٪ȉǌ٪ȷȬƲƲƫǛǾǍ٪ȯǛȷǯȷ٪ƇȯȉɍǾƫ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷ ¤ȯȉǼȉɅƲ٪ƇƫǕƲȯƲǾƤƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɬǛƲǳƫǛǾǍ٪ǳƇɦȷ Campaign Focus ½ǕƲ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ɦƇȷ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƲƫ٪ƤǛɅɬɦǛƫƲ٪ǛǾ٪-ǾǍǳǛȷǕ٪ƇǾƫ٪¯ȬƇǾǛȷǕؙ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ targeted outreach near school zones to reach: ƫɍǳɅ٪ƫȯǛɥƲȯȷ ½ƲƲǾ٪ƫȯǛɥƲȯȷ School of𿿿cials and parents Campaign Activities ½ǕƲ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ɍȷƲƫ٪Ʌɦȉ٪ȬȯǛǼƇȯɬ٪ȉɍɅȯƲƇƤǕ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬؘ ¤ƇǛƫ٪tƲƫǛƇؚ jȉƤƇǳ٪ȬɍƣǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪Ƈƫȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅƇȯǍƲɅƲƫ٪ƫǛǍǛɅƇǳ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȷɅȯƲƇǼǛǾǍ٪ǼƲƫǛƇؘ ȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪-ǾǍƇǍƲǼƲǾɅؚ An online safety quiz and pledge, ȉɍɅȯƲƇƤǕ٪ƲɥƲǾɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣȯȉƇƫ٪ƫǛȷɅȯǛƣɍɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾƇǳ٪ǼƇɅƲȯǛƇǳȷؘ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ ֿׁׄ #19..
- 519 -
By the Numbers ֿׂׂؙ־٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ǼƇɅƲȯǛƇǳȷ٪ ƫǛȷɅȯǛƣɍɅƲƫ٪حɬƇȯƫ٪ȷǛǍǾȷؙ٪ȬȉȷɅƲȯȷؙ٪ ǕƇǾƫȉɍɅȷؙ٪ƣƇǾǾƲȯȷخ ׀ׁׁ٪quizzes completed and 150 ȬǳƲƫǍƲȷ٪ȷǛǍǾƲƫ ׁ־׃٪ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷ٪ȯƲƇƤǕƲƫ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ ȉǾƲ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ɅƇƣǳǛǾǍ٪ƲɥƲǾɅ -ȷɅǛǼƇɅƲƫ٪ɅȉɅƇǳ٪ǼƲƫǛƇ٪ǛǼȬȯƲȷȷǛȉǾ ׀ׇֿֿؙؙׅ׃ׂ٪ Over 200 yard signs were distributed and displayed throughout Modesto during the “Let Kids Cross” pilot traf𿿿c safety campaign. The “Let Kids Cross” campaign demonstrates how education and community outreach can in˷uence driver awareness and behavior. Insights from this effort will guide future safety campaigns and complement Modesto’s broader Vision Zero initiatives. ֿׁׅ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 520 -
FɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ȬȬȉȯɅɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ FɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ ȬǳƇǾ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƤȉǼƲ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪Ƈ٪ǼǛɫ٪ȉǌ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳؙ٪ ȷɅƇɅƲؙ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾƇǳؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȷȉɍȯƤƲȷؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ ƤȉǼȬƲɅǛɅǛɥƲ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷؙ٪ȷƇǳƲȷ٪ɅƇɫ٪ȯƲɥƲǾɍƲȷؙ٪ formula allocations, and public–private ȬƇȯɅǾƲȯȷǕǛȬȷؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ǳǛȷɅ٪Ǜȷ٪ǾȉɅ٪ƲɫǕƇɍȷɅǛɥƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ƲǳǛǍǛƣǛǳǛɅɬؙ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ ƤɬƤǳƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇɥƇǛǳƇƣǳƲ٪ƇǼȉɍǾɅȷ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲ٪ȉɥƲȯ٪ ɅǛǼƲؘ٪ȷ٪ǾƲɦ٪ȉȬȬȉȯɅɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƲǼƲȯǍƲؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ should use this plan to prioritize projects and ȬȉȷǛɅǛȉǾ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤȉǼȬƲɅƲ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪Ʌȉ٪ ƇƫɥƇǾƤƲ٪¯¯ׂ٪½ǛƲȯ٪U٪ƇǾƫ٪½ǛƲȯ٪UU٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƇǳȉǾǍ٪ ǛɅɬعȉɦǾƲƫ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷؘ ȷ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȯǛɅƲȯǛƇ٪ƲɥȉǳɥƲؙ٪ ɅǕǛȷ٪ȬǳƇǾ٪ȷǕȉɍǳƫ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪Ƈȷ٪Ƈ٪ǍɍǛƫƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ƇǳǛǍǾ٪ǍȯƇǾɅ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅǛƲȷؙ٪ǌȉƤɍȷ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅȷ٪ ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪¤ȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪jȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ǳȉǾǍعɅƲȯǼ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ ȯƲƤȉǼǼƲǾƫƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ƈȷ٪ƇȬȬȯȉȬȯǛƇɅƲؘ Federal and State Funding Sources Active Transportation ¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ح1/2¤خ ƇǳǛǌȉȯǾǛƇىȷ٪ƤɅǛɥƲ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ ƤȉǾȷȉǳǛƫƇɅƲȷ٪ȷƲɥƲȯƇǳ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷɅƇɅƲ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ ȷȉɍȯƤƲȷ٪ǛǾɅȉ٪Ƈ٪ȷǛǾǍǳƲ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅȷ٪ ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƣǛǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪§ȉɍɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪¯ƤǕȉȉǳ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؘ٪-ǳǛǍǛƣǳƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ȷǛƫƲɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪ bikeways, crossings, traf 𿿿c calming near ȷƤǕȉȉǳȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǾȉǾعǛǾǌȯƇȷɅȯɍƤɅɍȯƲ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲǾƤȉɍȯƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ٪ ƇƤɅǛɥǛɅǛƲȷؘ٪FɍǾƫȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ƇɦƇȯƫƲƫ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ ȷɅƇɅƲɦǛƫƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾƇǳ٪ƤȉǼȬƲɅǛɅǛɥƲ٪ƤɬƤǳƲȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƇȯƲ٪ƇƫǼǛǾǛȷɅƲȯƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ƇǳǛǌȉȯǾǛƇ٪ ½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪
ȉǼǼǛȷȷǛȉǾ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ ǌȯȉǼ٪
ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷؘ California Of
𿿿ce of Traf
𿿿
c Safety (OTS) ½¯٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ǾȉǾعǛǾǌȯƇȷɅȯɍƤɅɍȯƲ٪ɅȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ɅƇȯǍƲɅ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯƇǳ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ ǌƇƤɅȉȯȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ȷȬƲƲƫǛǾǍؙ٪ǛǼȬƇǛȯƲƫ٪ƫȯǛɥǛǾǍؙ٪ distracted driving, school-zone safety, and ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛȷɅ٪ƇɦƇȯƲǾƲȷȷؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾȷ٪ǳǛǯƲ٪نjƲɅ٪ gǛƫȷ٪
ȯȉȷȷؙه٪ɅƇȯǍƲɅƲƫ٪ƲǾǌȉȯƤƲǼƲǾɅ٪ȉȬƲȯƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ ƫȯǛɥƲȯ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ȉɍɅȯƲƇƤǕؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƤȯȉȷȷعƇǍƲǾƤɬ٪ƫƇɅƇ٪ƤȉǳǳƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ƲǌǌȉȯɅȷؘ ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷ٪¯ɍȷɅƇǛǾƇƣǳƲ٪ ½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ¤ǳƇǾǾǛǾǍ٪
GȯƇǾɅȷ ½ǕƲȷƲ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪ǌɍǾƫ٪ȬǳƇǾǾǛǾǍ٪ƲǌǌȉȯɅȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ƇƫɥƇǾƤƲ٪ȷƇǌƲؙ٪ǼɍǳɅǛǼȉƫƇǳ٪ɅȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ǾƲɅɦȉȯǯȷؘ٪½ǕƲɬ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ɍȷƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ٪ ƫƲȷǛǍǾ٪ȷɅɍƫǛƲȷؙ٪ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅɍƇǳ٪ƇǳɅƲȯǾƇɅǛɥƲȷ٪ ƇǾƇǳɬȷǛȷؙ٪ ȉǼȬǳƲɅƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ȬǳƇǾȷؙ٪ǼɍǳɅǛǼȉƫƇǳ٪ ǾƲɅɦȉȯǯ٪ȷɅɍƫǛƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤǳǛǼƇɅƲعǌȉƤɍȷƲƫ٪ǼȉƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ ȬǳƇǾǾǛǾǍؘ٪Fȉȯ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉؙ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƣƲ٪ ȬƇȯɅǛƤɍǳƇȯǳɬ٪ɦƲǳǳ٪ȷɍǛɅƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǛǾǍ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯ٪ ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅȷ٪ƇǳȉǾǍ٪½ǛƲȯ٪UU٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȷƲǍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ȉȯ٪ ȷɅƇɅƲعȉɦǾƲƫ٪ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȬƇȯɅǾƲȯȷǕǛȬ ɦǛɅǕ٪ ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ƣƲ٪ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲƫؘ
ȉǾǍƲȷɅǛȉǾ٪
tǛɅǛǍƇɅǛȉǾ٪
ƇǾƫ٪Ǜȯ٪¦ɍƇǳǛɅɬ٪ UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ ح

t¦خ

t¦٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ɅȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ɥƲǕǛƤǳƲ٪ƲǼǛȷȷǛȉǾȷ٪ǛǾ٪ƇȯƲƇȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƫȉ٪ ǾȉɅ٪ǼƲƲɅ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ƇǛȯ٪ȮɍƇǳǛɅɬ٪ȷɅƇǾƫƇȯƫȷؘ٪UǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ¯ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾؙ٪¯ɅƇǾ
G٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ȯȉɍǍǕǳɬ٪ ٳؘׅ׀٪ǼǛǳǳǛȉǾ٪ǛǾ٪

t¦٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ȬƲȯ٪ɬƲƇȯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲǳǛǍǛƣǳƲ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ improvements, traf 𿿿c signal timing, Safe §ȉɍɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪¯ƤǕȉȉǳؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ƲǾƤȉɍȯƇǍƲ٪ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƣǛǯǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ɍȷƲؘ ֿׁ׆ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 521 -
OǛǍǕɦƇɬ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ ¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪حO¯U¤خ O¯U¤٪Ǜȷ٪Ƈ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ǼƇǾƇǍƲƫ٪ ǛǾ٪ ƇǳǛǌȉȯǾǛƇ٪ƣɬ٪
ƇǳɅȯƇǾȷؘ٪UɅ٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ ɅǕƇɅ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ǌƇɅƇǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷ٪ȉǾ٪ ȬɍƣǳǛƤ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬȷؘ٪-ǳǛǍǛƣǳƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ ǛǾɅƲȯȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ ǼƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷؙ٪ǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪ §ȉɍɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪¯ƤǕȉȉǳ٪ɅȯƲƇɅǼƲǾɅȷ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ƤȯƇȷǕ٪ ǕǛȷɅȉȯɬ٪ȉȯ٪ȷɬȷɅƲǼǛƤ٪ȯǛȷǯ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲƫ ƇǾƫ٪ƫȉƤɍǼƲǾɅƲƫؘ ¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ ǌȉȯ٪ǳǳ٪حׂ̄̄خ1/2 ǕƲ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪¯¯ׂ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼؙ٪ƤȯƲƇɅƲƫ٪ɍǾƫƲȯ٪ ɅǕƲ٪UǾǌȯƇȷɅȯɍƤɅɍȯƲ٪UǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪eȉƣȷ٪ƤɅؙ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ƇǍƲǾƤǛƲȷ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ȯȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ƫƲƇɅǕȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷؘ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇǳȯƲƇƫɬ٪ɍȷǛǾǍ٪¯¯ׂ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪Ʌȉ٪ ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤƇǾ٪ ȬɍȯȷɍƲ٪ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪¯¯ׂ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ build high-priority safety projects identi𿿿ed in ɅǕƲ٪ȬǳƇǾؘ٪tƇǾɬ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƲǳƲǼƲǾɅȷ٪ȉǌ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ȬǳƇǾ٪ƇȯƲ٪ ǛǾɅƲǾƫƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ǼƲƲɅ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƲǳǛǍǛƣǛǳǛɅɬ٪ ƤȯǛɅƲȯǛƇ٪ǌȉȯ٪¯¯ׂ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍؘ Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) STBG provides٪˛exible federal funding for Ƈ٪ɦǛƫƲ٪ȯƇǾǍƲ٪ȉǌ٪ɅȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؙ٪ ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȯȉƇƫ٪ȯƲǕƇƣǛǳǛɅƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ǌƇƤǛǳǛɅǛƲȷؘ٪UǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾؙ٪ ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪حȷȉǼƲɅǛǼƲȷ٪ȯƲǌƲȯȯƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪Ƈȷ٪ §ƲǍǛȉǾƇǳ٪¯ɍȯǌƇƤƲ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ ȉȯ٪§¯½¤٪ǌɍǾƫȷخ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼǼƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ¯ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷ٪ ȉɍǾƤǛǳ٪ȉǌ٪GȉɥƲȯǾǼƲǾɅȷ٪ح̄ɅƇǾ
Gخ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ɍȷƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƫƲǳǛɥƲȯ٪ǼɍǳɅǛǼȉƫƇǳ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ȉǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉىȷ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷؘ ½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ Development Act (TDA) ƇǳǛǌȉȯǾǛƇىȷ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪%ƲɥƲǳȉȬǼƲǾɅ٪ƤɅ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪¯ɅƇɅƲ٪½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȷȷǛȷɅƇǾƤƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪jȉƤƇǳ٪ ½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪FɍǾƫ٪ȯƲɥƲǾɍƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ ɍȷƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ȉȬƲȯƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȬƇȯƇɅȯƇǾȷǛɅؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ ȷȉǼƲ٪ƤƇȷƲȷ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ ɅǕƇɅ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅȯƇǾȷǛɅؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ ƇƫǼǛǾǛȷɅƲȯƲƫ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾƇǳǳɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ ¯ƇǌƲ٪§ȉɍɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪½ȯƇǾȷǛɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇȯɬ٪ ¯§½¯٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؘ ׇֿׁ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 522 -
Regional and Local Funding Sources tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪j٪ػ٪̄ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷ٪ ȉɍǾɅɬ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ¯ƇǳƲȷ٪½Ƈɫ Measure L is a 25-year, one-half cent ƤȉɍǾɅɬɦǛƫƲ٪ȷƇǳƲȷ٪ɅƇɫ٪ƇȬȬȯȉɥƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ɥȉɅƲȯȷ٪ǛǾ٪ 2016 to fund transportation improvements. §ƲɥƲǾɍƲȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ƇƫǼǛǾǛȷɅƲȯƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪¯ɅƇǾ G٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȯƲɅɍȯǾƲƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪
ȉɍǾɅɬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ streets and roads, traf𿿿c safety, public transit, ƇǾƫ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ ȉǌ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ƇǳȯƲƇƫɬ٪ɍȷƲȷ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪j٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ǼɍǳɅǛǼȉƫƇǳ٪ƇƤƤƲȷȷؘ ¯ɅƇǾ G §ƲǍǛȉǾƇǳ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ As the Metropolitan Planning Organization ǌȉȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾؙ٪¯ɅƇǾ G ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷɅƇɅƲ٪ǌɍǾƫȷ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ ǛɅȷ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼؙ٪ ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪¯½ Gؙ٪
t¦ؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȯƲǍǛȉǾƇǳ٪½¤٪ ǌɍǾƫȷؘ٪¯ɅƇǾ
G٪Ƈǳȷȉ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅȷ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ ƲǌǌȉȯɅȷ٪ǳǛǯƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤɅǛɥƲ٪½ȯƇǾȷȬȉȯɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪½ȉȉǳǯǛɅ٪ ƇǾƫ٪نÝƇǳǯ٪ƇǾƫ٪§ȉǳǳ٪¯ɅƇǾǛȷǳƇɍȷؙه٪ɦǕǛƤǕ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪Ƈ٪ǌȉɍǾƫƇɅǛȉǾ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƤȉȉȯƫǛǾƇɅƲƫ٪ ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅȷ٪ǛǾ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǾƲǛǍǕƣȉȯǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅǛƲȷؘ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ȉǌ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪FɍǾƫȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪¤ƇȯɅǾƲȯȷǕǛȬȷ jȉƤƇǳ٪ȷȉɍȯƤƲȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬىȷ٪ƤƇȬǛɅƇǳ٪ ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ƣɍƫǍƲɅؙ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǼƲǾɅ٪ǛǼȬƇƤɅ٪ ǌƲƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬƇȯɅǾƲȯȷǕǛȬȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȷƤǕȉȉǳ٪ƫǛȷɅȯǛƤɅȷ٪ and community organizations can also ǕƲǳȬ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅ٪¯¯ׂ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؘ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪j ƇǳǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ǛǾ٪ȬƇȯɅǛƤɍǳƇȯؙ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ƤȉǼƣǛǾƲƫ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ȷɅƇɅƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ǍȯƇǾɅȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƇƫɥƇǾƤƲ٪ ƫƲȷǛǍǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƤȉǾȷɅȯɍƤɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ identi𿿿ed in this plan. tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪O tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪O٪Ǜȷ٪Ƈ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȷƇǳƲȷ٪ɅƇɫ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇǳ٪ƤǛɅɬ٪ȷƲȯɥǛƤƲȷؙ٪ ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȯƲǳƇɅƲƫ٪ǾƲƲƫȷؘ٪Fȉȯ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲ٪O٪ƤƇǾ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ traf𿿿c enforcement. ֿׂ־ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 523 -
¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
Demonstration Projects tȉƫƲȷɅȉىȷ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪%ƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪GɍǛƫƲ٪ ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȬȯƇƤɅǛƤƇǳؙ٪ƇƤɅǛȉǾعȉȯǛƲǾɅƲƫ٪ ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬǛǳȉɅǛǾǍ٪ȷǕȉȯɅعɅƲȯǼؙ٪ǳȉɦعƤȉȷɅ٪ ȷɅȯƲƲɅ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؘ٪%ƲȷǛǍǾƲƫ٪ǌȉȯ٪ ɍȷƲ٪ƣɬ٪Ƈ٪ǳƲƇƫ٪ƇǍƲǾƤɬؙ٪ɦǕǛƤǕ٪Ƥȉɍǳƫ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ ǍȯȉɍȬȷ٪ǳǛǯƲ٪ƤǛɅɬ٪ƫƲȬƇȯɅǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ organizations, schools, and advocacy partners, the guide lays out a٪˛exible process for ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬǛǾǍؙ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛǾǍ٪ ɅƲǼȬȉȯƇȯɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ ƫƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪Ƥȉɍǳƫ٪Ƈǳǳȉɦ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅƲȷɅ٪ ȬȉɅƲǾɅǛƇǳ٪ȷȉǳɍɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪Ƥɍȯƣ٪ƲɫɅƲǾȷǛȉǾȷؙ٪ enhanced crosswalks, or traf𿿿c-calming ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ɍȷǛǾǍ٪ǼƇɅƲȯǛƇǳȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǛǾȷɅƇǳǳƲƫ٪ ȮɍǛƤǯǳɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇƫǬɍȷɅƲƫ٪ƣƇȷƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ ǌƲƲƫƣƇƤǯ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȉɅǕƲȯ٪ȉƣȷƲȯɥƇɅǛȉǾȷؘ ÝǕǛǳƲ٪ǌȉƤɍȷƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ɅƲǼȬȉȯƇȯɬ٪ǛǾɅƲȯɥƲǾɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ the guide emphasizes how demonstration ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ȬǳƇɬ٪Ƈ٪ƤȯǛɅǛƤƇǳ٪ȯȉǳƲ٪ǛǾ٪ȷǕƇȬǛǾǍ٪ ǳȉǾǍعɅƲȯǼ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅȷؘ٪ ɬ٪ǍƲǾƲȯƇɅǛǾǍ٪ ƫƇɅƇ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷؙ٪ƣɍǛǳƫǛǾǍ٪ ȬɍƣǳǛƤ٪ɍǾƫƲȯȷɅƇǾƫǛǾǍؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌȉȷɅƲȯǛǾǍ٪ƲƇȯǳɬ٪ ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ɍȬǍȯƇƫƲȷؙ٪ɅǕƲȷƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ ǕƲǳȬ٪ƣɍǛǳƫ٪ƤȉǾȷƲǾȷɍȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǌɍɅɍȯƲ٪ƤƇȬǛɅƇǳ٪ ǛǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅȷؘ٪½ǕƲ٪ƇȬȬȯȉƇƤǕ٪Ǜȷ٪ȷƤƇǳƇƣǳƲؙ٪ ƇƫƇȬɅƇƣǳƲ٪Ʌȉ٪ƫǛǌǌƲȯƲǾɅ٪ȬƇȯɅǾƲȯȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǳǛǍǾƲƫ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ƣȉɅǕ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ǳǛǯƲ٪¯¯ׂ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅǛƲȷ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕȉɍɅ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉؘ٪ tȉȯƲ٪ǛǾǌȉȯǼƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȷɅƲȬعƣɬعȷɅƲȬ٪ ǍɍǛƫƇǾƤƲؙ٪Ʌȉȉǳȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȬǳƇǾǾǛǾǍؙ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƤƇǾ٪ƣƲ٪ǌȉɍǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪jؚ٪ ¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪%ƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪GɍǛƫƲ٪tƲǼȉȯƇǾƫɍǼؘ ֿֿׂ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 524 -
UǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪
ÝȉȯǯȬǳƇǾ The٪𿿿ve-year Implementation Workplan for the
tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǳǳ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪ ¤ǳƇǾ٪حAppendix M: Implementation Workplanخ٪ ɅȯƇǾȷǳƇɅƲȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪¤ǳƇǾىȷ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȷɅعȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ ǛǾɅȉ٪Ƈ٪ǌƲƇȷǛƣǳƲؙ٪ȬǕƇȷƲƫ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ƇǳǛǍǾƲƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ City’s staf 𿿿ng, funding, and delivery capacity. ƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȉȯǍƇǾǛɶƲƫ٪ǛǾɅȉ٪ǾƲƇȯعɅƲȯǼ٪حãƲƇȯ٪ֿخؙ٪ ǼǛƫعɅƲȯǼ٪حãƲƇȯȷ٪ػ׀ׁخؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳȉǾǍƲȯعɅƲȯǼ٪حãƲƇȯȷ٪ ׂخ׃ػ٪ǕȉȯǛɶȉǾȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ȷɅƲƇƫɬ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ allowing٪˛exibility to respond to new funding ȉȬȬȉȯɅɍǾǛɅǛƲȷؙ٪ƲɥȉǳɥǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǾƫǛɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǳƲȷȷȉǾȷ٪ ǳƲƇȯǾƲƫ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؘ٪Ƥȯȉȷȷ٪Ƈǳǳ٪ phases, the Workplan emphasizes a balanced ǼǛɫ٪ȉǌ٪ȬȉǳǛƤɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼǼƇɅǛƤ٪ƇƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ ƇǳȉǾǍȷǛƫƲ٪ɅƇȯǍƲɅƲƫ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬɍȯȷɍǛɅ٪ȉǌ٪ high-value implementation grants to maximize safety bene 𿿿ts in areas of greatest need. UǾ٪ãƲƇȯ٪ֿ, the Workplan prioritizes foundational ƇƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ȬȉȷǛɅǛȉǾ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȷɍƤƤƲȷȷǌɍǳ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ȷɍȷɅƇǛǾƲƫ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ ƇƫɥƇǾƤǛǾǍ٪ǕǛǍǕعǛǼȬƇƤɅؙ٪ǳȉɦعƤȉȷɅ٪ȬȉǳǛƤɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼǼƇɅǛƤ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪ƇƫɥƇǾƤǛǾǍ٪ Safe System–aligned policies like Assembly Bill ׁׂ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫȷ٪ȉǾ٪ OǛǍǕعUǾǬɍȯɬ٪
vƲɅɦȉȯǯ٪ ƤȉȯȯǛƫȉȯȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷɅȯƲǾǍɅǕƲǾǛǾǍ٪ǛǾɅƲȯƫƲȬƇȯɅǼƲǾɅƇǳ٪ ƤȉȉȯƫǛǾƇɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȯȉǼȉɅƲ٪ȷɍȷɅƇǛǾƲƫ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǌȉƤɍȷƲƫ٪ ƲǌǌȉȯɅؘ٪٪ƤƲǾɅȯƇǳ٪ƲǼȬǕƇȷǛȷ٪ƫɍȯǛǾǍ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ȬǕƇȷƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ ȬȯƲȬƇȯǛǾǍ٪ƤȉǼȬƲɅǛɅǛɥƲ٪ƇȬȬǳǛƤƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǼƇǬȉȯ٪ ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǳǳ٪حׂ̄̄خ٪UǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ GȯƇǾɅؙ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅƲƫ٪ƣɬ٪ƤǳƲƇȯ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ȷƤȉȬƲȷؙ٪ ƤȉǾƤƲȬɅɍƇǳ٪ƫƲȷǛǍǾȷؙ٪ƤȉȷɅ٪ƲȷɅǛǼƇɅƲȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƫƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅƲƫ٪ȯƲƇƫǛǾƲȷȷؘ %ɍȯǛǾǍ٪ãƲƇȯȷ٪ػ׀ׁؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ÝȉȯǯȬǳƇǾ٪ȷǕǛǌɅȷ٪ɅȉɦƇȯƫ٪ ǛǾǛɅǛƇǳ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪ identi 𿿿ed in the Action Plan, leveraging both ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȯƲȷȉɍȯƤƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǾɅǛƤǛȬƇɅƲƫ٪ǍȯƇǾɅ٪ǌɍǾƫǛǾǍؘ٪ This phase emphasizes advancement of higher- ƤȉȷɅؙ٪ǕǛǍǕƲȯعǛǼȬƇƤɅ٪ǛǾǌȯƇȷɅȯɍƤɅɍȯƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ OǛǍǕعUǾǬɍȯɬ٪
vƲɅɦȉȯǯ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛǾ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ ƲȮɍǛɅɬ٪ƇȯƲƇȷؙ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ƤȉǾɅǛǾɍǛǾǍ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲɫȬƇǾƫ٪ ƤȉǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇȯɬ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ƲǾǌȉȯƤƲǼƲǾɅؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ǼƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼȷ٪ǛǾ٪ƤȉǳǳƇƣȉȯƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ǯƲɬ٪ȷɅƇǯƲǕȉǳƫƲȯȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬؘ٪ ǳȉȷƲ٪ƤȉȉȯƫǛǾƇɅǛȉǾ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪
ǛɅɬىȷ٪
ƇȬǛɅƇǳ٪ UǼȬȯȉɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƇǼؙ٪ȬƇɥƲǼƲǾɅ٪ǼƇǾƇǍƲǼƲǾɅؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ȯȉɍɅǛǾƲ٪ǼƇǛǾɅƲǾƇǾƤƲ٪ƇƤɅǛɥǛɅǛƲȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ǛǼȬȉȯɅƇǾɅ٪ Ʌȉ٪ǛǾɅƲǍȯƇɅǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤȉɍǾɅƲȯǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ǛǾɅȉ٪ ȬǳƇǾǾƲƫ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؙ٪ƤȉǾɅȯȉǳǳǛǾǍ٪ƤȉȷɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƲǾƇƣǳǛǾǍ٪ ef 𿿿cient delivery. Performance monitoring during this period supports re 𿿿nement of ȷɅȯƇɅƲǍǛƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƲǾȷɍȯƲ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅȷ٪ȯƲǼƇǛǾ ƇǳǛǍǾƲƫ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȉɍɅƤȉǼƲȷؘ UǾ٪ãƲƇȯȷ٪ׂ׃ػؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ÝȉȯǯȬǳƇǾ٪ǌȉƤɍȷƲȷ٪ȉǾ٪ institutionalizing successful practices, delivering Ƈ٪ǳƇȯǍƲȯ٪ȷƲɅ٪ȉǌ٪ǌɍǾƫƲƫ٪ƤƇȬǛɅƇǳ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƇƫɥƇǾƤǛǾǍ٪ȬȉǳǛƤɬ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƲǼƣƲƫ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ ǛǾɅȉ٪ƲɥƲȯɬƫƇɬ٪ƫƲƤǛȷǛȉǾعǼƇǯǛǾǍؘ٪ The Workplan recognizes that achieving Modesto’s goal to halve traf 𿿿c fatalities and severe injuries by 2045—and ultimately eliminate ɅǕƲǼؼɦǛǳǳ٪ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲ٪ȷɍȷɅƇǛǾƲƫ٪ƤȉǼǼǛɅǼƲǾɅ٪ over time. By focusing the٪𿿿rst٪𿿿ve years on ȯƲƇǳǛȷɅǛƤؙ٪ǕǛǍǕ٪ȯƲɅɍȯǾ٪ȉǾ٪ǛǾɥƲȷɅǼƲǾɅ٪ƇƤɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ÝȉȯǯȬǳƇǾ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲȷ٪Ƈ٪ȬȯƇƤɅǛƤƇǳ٪ȯȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪ƲƇȯǳɬ٪ ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ɦǕǛǳƲ٪ǳƇɬǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǍȯȉɍǾƫɦȉȯǯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǳȉǾǍع term advancement toward Vision Zero. The City ƤƇǾ٪ɍȷƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫ٪½ƲǼȬǳƇɅƲ٪ ƫƲȷƤȯǛƣƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉǳǳȉɦǛǾǍ٪ȷƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ƫȉƤɍǼƲǾɅ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ȷǕƇȯƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ public during this٪𿿿ve-year phase. ֿׂ׀ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 525 -
Measuring Success
ɍǛǳƫǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲȯ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ƇǾ٪ȉǾǍȉǛǾǍ٪ƲǌǌȉȯɅؘ٪½ȉ٪ȷɅƇɬ٪ƇƤƤȉɍǾɅƇƣǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅȯƇƤǯ٪ȯƲȷɍǳɅȷؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ȉǌ٪ tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ǕƇȷ٪ƫƲɥƲǳȉȬƲƫ٪Ƈ٪ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ɅȉɦƇȯƫ٪ǛɅȷ٪ǍȉƇǳȷؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯ٪ ǍǛɥƲȷ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪Ƈ٪ǼƲɅǕȉƫ٪Ʌȉ٪ƤǳƲƇȯǳɬ٪ȷǕȉɦ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪Ǜȷ٪ƣƲǛǾǍ٪ǼƇƫƲؙ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ƤǕƇǳǳƲǾǍƲȷ٪ȯƲǼƇǛǾؙ٪ ƇǾƫ٪Ǖȉɦ٪ƲɥƲȯɬ٪ƇƤɅǛȉǾ٪ƤȉǾɅȯǛƣɍɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ȯƲƫɍƤǛǾǍ٪ȷƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƫƲƇɅǕȷ٪ȉǾ٪ǳȉƤƇǳ٪ȷɅȯƲƲɅȷؘ٪tȉȯƲ٪ ƫƲɅƇǛǳ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ǌȯƇǼƲɦȉȯǯ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǛɅȷ٪ȷɅȯɍƤɅɍȯƲ٪Ǜȷ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪vؚ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫ٪½ƲǼȬǳƇɅƲؘ A Practical, §ƲȬƲƇɅƇƣǳƲ٪¯ɬȷɅƲǼ ½ȉ٪ǼƇǯƲ٪ȯƲȬȉȯɅǛǾǍ٪ǼƇǾƇǍƲƇƣǳƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǼƲƇǾǛǾǍǌɍǳؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ɍȷƲ٪Ƈ٪ȯƲȬȉȯɅ٪ƤƇȯƫ٪ ɅƲǼȬǳƇɅƲ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇǳǛǍǾȷ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪ ƇǾƫ٪§ȉƇƫȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ǳǳ٪حׂ̄̄خ٪ǍɍǛƫƇǾƤƲؘ٪½ǕǛȷ٪ ɅƲǼȬǳƇɅƲ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ƣƲ٪ɍȬƫƇɅƲƫ٪ȯƲǍɍǳƇȯǳɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷǕƇȯƲƫ٪ ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬىȷ٪ɦƲƣȷǛɅƲ٪Ƈȷ٪ȬƇȯɅ٪ȉǌ٪Ƈ٪ȬɍƣǳǛƤ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪ ¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫؘ ¤ǳƇǾ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ػ٪tƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪Ǖȉɦ٪ǼɍƤǕ٪ ȉǌ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾ٪ǕƇȷ٪ƣƲƲǾ٪ ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƲƫؙ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ completed, traf𿿿c enforcement activities ǌȉȯ٪ɅƇȯǍƲɅ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǛǼȬƇƤɅ٪ȉǌ٪ ƫƇɅƇعƫȯǛɥƲǾ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾȷؘ ȯƇȷǕ٪ɍɅƤȉǼƲȷ٪ػ٪1/2ȯƇƤǯȷ٪ǾƲƇȯع٪ƇǾƫ٪ ǼǛƫعɅƲȯǼ٪ɅȯƲǾƫȷ٪ǛǾ٪ǌƇɅƇǳǛɅǛƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷؙ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪Ƈ٪ǌȉƤɍȷ٪ȉǾ٪ȬƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾؙ٪ ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȷȬƲƲƫǛǾǍعȯƲǳƇɅƲƫ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷؘ -ƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ ƇǼȬƇǛǍǾȷ٪ػ٪%ȉƤɍǼƲǾɅȷ٪ ȯƲȷɍǳɅȷ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲɅƲƫ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾȷؙ٪ ǛǾƤǳɍƫǛǾǍ٪ǛǾɅƲǾƫƲƫ٪ǍȉƇǳȷؙ٪ƤƇǼȬƇǛǍǾ٪ ȯƲƇƤǕؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪Ǖȉɦ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ǼƲǼƣƲȯȷ٪ƤƇǾ٪ ȬƇȯɅǛƤǛȬƇɅƲ٪ȉȯ٪ȷɍȬȬȉȯɅ٪ȉǾǍȉǛǾǍ٪ƲǌǌȉȯɅȷؘ tȉƫƲȷɅȉُȷ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪ȉǾǍȉǛǾǍ٪ɍȬƫƇɅƲȷ٪ȉǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪
ǛɅɬُȷ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ɅȉɦƇȯƫȷ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ǍȉƇǳȷؘ ֿׁׂ
٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 526 -
¤ǳƇǾ٪¤ȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ ¤ȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲɅƲƫ٪ɅǕǛȷ٪ɬƲƇȯ ¤ƲȯƤƲǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲɅƲƫ ¤ƲȯƤƲǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪ƤȉǼȬǳƲɅƲƫ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ǳȉƤƇɅƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅǛƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƇȯƲ٪ƫǛȷƇƫɥƇǾɅƇǍƲƫ tǛǳƲȷ٪ȉǌ٪ǾƲɦ٪ƣǛǯƲɦƇɬȷ٪ǛǾȷɅƇǳǳƲƫ ¤ƲȯƤƲǾɅ٪ȉǌ٪ȬǳƇǾǾƲƫ٪ƣǛǯƲɦƇɬ٪ ǼǛǳƲƇǍƲ٪ƫƲǳǛɥƲȯƲƫ ¤ǳƇǾǾƲƫ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪ǌȉȯ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǾƲɫɅ٪ ȯƲȬȉȯɅǛǾǍ٪ȬƲȯǛȉƫ U½¯٪¤ȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ ȉǼȬǳƲɅƲƫ Crash Outcomes §ȉƇƫɦƇɬ٪ǌƇɅƇǳǛɅǛƲȷ ¯ƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷ ¤ƲƫƲȷɅȯǛƇǾع٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳƲعǛǾɥȉǳɥƲƫ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ ¯ȬƲƲƫǛǾǍعȯƲǳƇɅƲƫ٪ƤȯƇȷǕƲȷ ׀ׄ٪ Uǌ٪ƫƇɅƇ٪Ǜȷ٪ǳǛǼǛɅƲƫؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƤȉǾȷǛƫƲȯ٪ǕǛǍǕǳǛǍǕɅǛǾǍ٪ƫƇɅƇ٪ǌȯȉǼ٪ȷǛǼǛǳƇȯ٪ȬƇȷɅ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷؙ٪ƇǾɅǛƤǛȬƇɅƲƫ٪ƤȯƇȷǕ٪ȯƲƫɍƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƣƇȷƲƫ٪ȉǾ٪ȷɅƇɅǛȷɅǛƤƇǳ٪ɅƲƤǕǾǛȮɍƲȷ٪ȷɍƤǕ٪Ƈȷ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ Performance Functions, or empirically derived data such as Crash Modi𿿿cation Factors. Education Campaigns -ƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ȯƲƇƤǕ٪ǛǾ٪ȬƲȯȷȉǾ -ƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼ٪ǛǼȬȯƲȷȷǛȉǾȷ٪ȉȯ٪ ɥǛƲɦȷ٪ȉǾǳǛǾƲ vɍǼƣƲȯ٪ȉǌ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȉȯ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ ƲɥƲǾɅȷ٪ȷȬȉǾȷȉȯƲƫ ƫƫǛɅǛȉǾƇǳǳɬؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ǛɅɬ٪ǼƇɬ٪ƤȉǾƫɍƤɅ٪ȬƲȯǛȉƫ٪ ƣƲǌȉȯƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƇǌɅƲȯ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ȉǌ٪ǛǾƫǛɥǛƫɍƇǳ٪ ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ƫȉƤɍǼƲǾɅ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǛǼȬƇƤɅ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ǼƇƫƲ٪ɦǕƲǾ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƲƫؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛȉǾȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ɅǕƲ٪ǌȉǳǳȉɦǛǾǍؚ ¤ȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ƲȷɅƇƣǳǛȷǕ٪ƤȉǾɅƲɫɅ٪ǌȉȯ٪ ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅىȷ٪ƤȉǾǾƲƤɅǛȉǾ٪ Ʌȉ٪ƤǛɅɬ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅǛƲȷؘ٪%ƲɅƇǛǳȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ ȬȯȉǬƲƤɅ٪ǾƇǼƲؙ٪ǳȉƤƇɅǛȉǾؙ٪ȉɥƲȯǳƇȬ٪ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ OUv٪ȉȯ٪ƇǾ٪ƲȮɍǛɅɬ٪ȬȯǛȉȯǛɅɬ٪ƇȯƲƇؙ٪Ƈ٪ƣȯǛƲǌ٪ ȉɥƲȯɥǛƲɦؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ƣƲǌȉȯƲإƇǌɅƲȯ٪ȬǕȉɅȉȷؘ٪ Community feedback٪Ʌȉ٪ƫƲǼȉǾȷɅȯƇɅƲ٪ ȬɍƣǳǛƤ٪ȷƲǾɅǛǼƲǾɅؘ٪%ƲɅƇǛǳȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅ٪ȮɍȉɅƲȷ٪ȉȯ٪ȷɍȯɥƲɬ٪ȷɅƇɅǛȷɅǛƤȷؘ٪٪ ƣȷƲȯɥƲƫ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯƇǳ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲȷ٪ɅǕƇɅ٪ ƤƇǾ٪ȷǕȉɦ٪ƲƇȯǳɬ٪ƲǌǌƲƤɅȷ٪ȉǾ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯؘ٪ -ɫƇǼȬǳƲ٪ƣƲǕƇɥǛȉȯƇǳ٪ƤǕƇǾǍƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅȯƇƤǯ٪ ǼƇɬ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲ٪ȷȬƲƲƫ٪ȯƲƫɍƤɅǛȉǾȷؙ٪ƫȯǛɥƲȯ٪ ɬǛƲǳƫǛǾǍ٪ȯƇɅƲ٪ƇɅ٪ƤȯȉȷȷɦƇǳǯȷؙ٪ȉȯ٪ɦƇǳǯǛǾǍ٪ ƇǾƫ٪ƣǛƤɬƤǳǛǾǍ٪ɥȉǳɍǼƲȷ٪ƣƲǌȉȯƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƇǌɅƲȯ٪ǛǼȬǳƲǼƲǾɅƇɅǛȉǾؘ٪ ȯƇȷǕ٪ȯƇɅƲȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅȯƇƤǯ٪ǯƲɬ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ȉɍɅƤȉǼƲȷ٪ حƲؘǍؘؙ٪ȉɥƲȯƇǳǳ٪ƤȯƇȷǕ٪ȯƇɅƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȯƇɅƲȷ٪ȷȉȯɅƲƫ٪ ƣɬ٪ȷƲɥƲȯǛɅɬ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼȉƫƲخؘ׀ׄ What Will Be Tracked UǾ٪ƇƫƫǛɅǛȉǾ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȬƲȯǌȉȯǼƇǾƤƲ٪ǼƲɅȯǛƤȷ٪ɅȯƇƤǯƲƫ٪ǛǾ٪ɅǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫؙ٪ɅǕƲ٪
ǛɅɬ٪ȬǳƇǾȷ٪Ʌȉ٪ɅȯƇƤǯ٪Ƈ٪ǼȉȯƲ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳƲƫ٪ȷƲɅ٪ȉǌ٪ǼƲɅȯǛƤȷ٪ǛǾɅƲȯǾƇǳǳɬ٪Ʌȉ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫƲ٪Ƈ٪ ǼȉȯƲ٪ƫƲɅƇǛǳƲƫ٪ƲɥƇǳɍƇɅǛȉǾ٪ȉǌ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɍǾƫƲȯȷɅƇǾƫ٪ɦǕƲɅǕƲȯ٪ȷƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƇƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ɦȉȯǯǛǾǍؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ƫƇɅƇعƫȯǛɥƲǾ٪ȬƲȯǌȉȯǼƇǾƤƲ٪ǼƲƇȷɍȯƲȷ٪ƇǾƫ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƇǼع ƣƇȷƲƫ٪ȉɍɅƤȉǼƲȷ٪ǼƇɬ٪ǛǾƤǳɍƫƲؚ ֿׂׂ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 527 -
gƲƲȬǛǾǍ٪ɅǕƲ٪

ȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬ٪ UǾɥȉǳɥƲƫ ½ǕƲ٪¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪
Ƈȯƫ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ȷƲȯɥƲ٪Ƈȷ٪ ɅǕƲ٪
ǛɅɬىȷ٪ǼƇǛǾ٪Ʌȉȉǳ٪ǌȉȯ٪ȷǕƇȯǛǾǍ٪ȬȯȉǍȯƲȷȷ٪ ɦǛɅǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ƤȉǼǼɍǾǛɅɬؘ٪½ǕƲȷƲ٪ɍȬƫƇɅƲȷ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ summarize completed projects, changes in ƤȯƇȷǕ٪ɅȯƲǾƫȷؙ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ȯƲƇƤǕ٪ȉǌ٪ƲƫɍƤƇɅǛȉǾ٪ƇǾƫ٪ ƲǾǌȉȯƤƲǼƲǾɅ٪ƲǌǌȉȯɅȷؘ٪-ƇƤǕ٪ɍȬƫƇɅƲ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ǕƲǳȬ٪ ȯƲȷǛƫƲǾɅȷ٪ɍǾƫƲȯȷɅƇǾƫ٪Ǖȉɦ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪ƤɅǛȉǾ٪¤ǳƇǾ٪ ƇƤɅǛȉǾȷ٪ƇȯƲ٪ȬƲȯǌȉȯǼǛǾǍ٪ǛǾ٪ȬȯƇƤɅǛƤƲ٪ƇǾƫ٪ɦǕƲȯƲ٪ ƤȉǾɅǛǾɍƲƫ٪ƇɅɅƲǾɅǛȉǾ٪Ǜȷ٪ǾƲƲƫƲƫؘ٪ ɬ٪ȬȯȉɥǛƫǛǾǍ٪ȉǾǍȉǛǾǍ٪ɍȬƫƇɅƲȷ٪ɅǕȯȉɍǍǕ٪ɅǕƲ٪ ¯ƇǌƲ٪¯ɅȯƲƲɅȷ٪§ƲȬȉȯɅ٪ Ƈȯƫؙ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ǾȉɅ٪ ȉǾǳɬ٪ǼƲƲɅ٪ǌƲƫƲȯƇǳ٪ǍȯƇǾɅ٪ȯƲȮɍǛȯƲǼƲǾɅȷؙ٪ǛɅ٪ɦǛǳǳ٪ Ƈǳȷȉ٪ƣɍǛǳƫ٪ɅȯɍȷɅ٪ƇǾƫ٪ǼȉǼƲǾɅɍǼ٪ɅȉɦƇȯƫ٪ɅǕƲ٪ shared goal of eliminating traf𿿿c deaths and ȷƲȯǛȉɍȷ٪ǛǾǬɍȯǛƲȷؘ٪ ֿׂ׃ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 528 -
٪¯ƇǌƲȯ٪tȉƫƲȷɅȉ٪
for Everyone The Modesto Safety Action Plan charts a clear path to safer streets for all Modestans. By combining targeted infrastructure improvements, policy actions, education, and enforcement, the Action Plan demonstrates the City’s commitment to eliminating severe injuries and fatalities while expanding safe, convenient, and equitable mobility. Guided by Safe System Approach principles and informed by community input, this plan aims to help all residents and visitors —whether walking, biking, riding transit, or driving—travel safely and con𿿿dently throughout Modesto. ֿׂׄ ٪§ȉƇƫǼƇȬ٪ǌȉȯ٪½ȯƇǾȷǌȉȯǼƇɅǛɥƲ٪¯ƇǌƲɅɬ٪
ǕƇǾǍƲ
#19..
- 529 -
ׅ־
Appendices
#19..
- 530 -
Appendices
ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪ ÜU¯Uv٪í-§٪§-¯jÄ½Uv Appendix B
jjU¯Uv jv%¯
¤- ¯Ätt§ãؙ٪OUGO UveÄ§ã٪ v-½Ý§gؙ٪v%٪¯F-½ã٪¤§FUj-¯٪ t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪ §U¯g F
½§٪vjã¯U¯٪ t-t§v%Ät Appendix D ¤Ä
jU
٪-vGG-t-v½٪¯Ätt§ã٪ t-t§v%Ät Appendix E ¤jU
ã٪v%٪¤§G§t
-v
Ot§gUvG٪¯¯-¯¯t-v½٪ t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪F ¯F-½ã٪
Äv½-§t-¯Ä§- ¯-j-
½Uv GÄU%v
-٪v% ½j
â ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪G ¯F-½ã٪¤§e-
½٪¤§U§U½Uí½Uv t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪O TIER I HIGH-PRIORITY §- tt-v%½Uv¯٪ t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪U ½U-§٪UU٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯٪ t-t§v%Ät Appendix J ½U-§٪UUU٪§-
tt-v%½Uv¯٪ t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪g ½§FFU
٪¯F-½ã٪
t¤UGv §-¤§½ ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪j ¯F-½ã٪%-tv¯½§½Uv GÄU%- t-t§v%Ät ȬȬƲǾƫǛɫ٪t Ut¤j-t-v½½Uv٪Ý§g¤jv Appendix N ¯F-٪¯½§--½¯٪§-¤§½٪ §%٪½-t¤j½- ֿׂ׆
ȬȬƲǾƫǛƤƲȷ
#19..
- 531 -
¤§-¤§-%٪
ãؚ #19..
- 532 -
343 E Main Street | Stockton, CA 95202 | (209) 645-4148 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: March 18, 2025
To: Max Navarro, City of Modesto
From: Sean Reseigh and Ashlee Takushi, RSP1, Fehr & Peers Subject: Final Collision Landscape Summary, High Injury Network, and Safety Profiles
WC24-4104.00
Conventional safety practice has focused on reacting to collisions and recommendations based on the siloed categories of the Es (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services).

Since collision reports focus on the moment of impact and time immediately preceding it, and because the purpose of the report is to determine "fault" among the involved parties (such as for insurance claims or criminal prosecution), the "cause" of the collision is often attributed to the behavior of one of both parties. This can miss the factors that preceded the collision by five hours, five years, or even five decades, especially as relates to built environment (street design and operations) and exposure conditions (why and where travel occurs, where people live and work and why, what modes they have access to and why, etc.).

Additionally, while collision data can give historical knowledge on collision trends, a reactive approach to safety based on collision data alone can miss other areas of the City that may have similar risk factors for severe and fatal injuries if a collision occurs there. Because the root cause of fatalities and serious injuries occurring on the City's roadways is the result of kinetic energy exceeding the human body's tolerable amount of force, identifying locations with high kinetic energy risk potential can be an important proactive approach to safety. An object's mass and speed, as well as the angle of collision impact, determines how much force is applied to a vulnerable human body and the severity of the resulting injury. Kinetic energy risk is a combination of exposure to the risk, presence of conflicts (likelihood), and level of severity (based on speed, mass, and angle).

This memo summarizes the collision landscape summary and risk methodologies developed by Fehr & Peers and Alta for the reactive High Injury Network and proactive High Risk Network, and accompanying Safety Profiles developed across both assessments, as part of the City of Modesto Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action Plan.
#19..
- 533 -
Max Navarro | City of Modesto
March 18, 2025

Page 2 of 23 ends

Modesto City CouncilApril 7, 2026

Modesto City Council
April 7, 2026