Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Montebello City Council
August 26, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 26, 2026
Body
Montebello City Council
Pages
840
Original file
143.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on montebelloca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 4 Inspiration
The bus shelter design concepts were inspired by the rich history of Montebello, primarily the mid-century architecture of Montebello City Hall. Much of the City of Montebello was built in the 1940s and 1950s and features minimalist, midcentury housing stock. City Hall features a low-slung canopy with modern neo-classical fluted columns, intersecting horizontal planes, and breeze-block walls to provide sun protection while allowing for passive ventilation. Additionally, the perforated panel design comes from the City’s name, Montebello, which means “beautiful mountain” in Italian and captures the view of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. Another design precedent takes inspiration from the new “ribbon” design found on MBL buses. Design precedents included the Barcelona Pavilion, City Hall breeze block details, and the movement of dappled light.

Concept Development
Concept development began with key ideas from the case studies, MBL staff workshop, and inspiration from the City of Montebello. Figure 3 showcase preliminary sketches which illustrate key ideas that were considered during the development of the bus stop design concept.

Figure 2: Inspiration from the City of Montebello

Page 223 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 5 Figure 3: Preliminary Concept Development Sketches

Page 224 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 6 Bus Stop Typologies
Ultimately, the design team presented designs for three typologies of the upgraded bus stops – basic, enhanced, and premium. The designs are a “kit of parts,” a modular system that uses standardized, interchangeable components that can be configured in multiple ways and build upon each other based on locational context.

Basic
The Basic option provides essential bus amenities in areas with minimal sidewalk width. These stops will have a bus pad, bus pole, signage, and an integrated trash receptacle.

Figure 4: Basic Typology Design

Page 225 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 7 Enhanced
The Enhanced amenity option is for areas with greater ridership and adequate sidewalk space to fit a bench, in addition to the amenities at the basic stop. The Enhanced amenity option will use the freestanding trash receptacle option.

Figure 5: Enhanced Typology Design

Page 226 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 8 Premium
The Premium option is distinct in that it has a bus shelter, unlike the rest. This option can be applied to stop areas with over 5 feet of sidewalk and with greater ridership. Premium stop designs include integrated lighting, overhead signage, and perforated, powder coated panels. The Premium option can be customized based on local conditions and stop needs. Higher ridership stops may include multiple benches, multiple trash receptacles, or custom shelter features.

Figure 6: Premium Typology Design

Page 227 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 9 Typology Summary
Table 2 below shows the total number of each bus stop typology that was used for the BSIP cost estimate. Premium stops are those with a bus shelter, enhanced stops have a bench and trash receptacle but no shelter, and basic stops do not have a shelter or bench, but a sign pole with an integrated trash receptacle.

City Jurisdiction Bus Stop Typology Count
In the City of Montebello
Basic 65
Enhanced 60
Premium 49
Outside of the City of Montebello
Basic 243
Enhanced 199
Premium 207
Table 2: Bus Stop Typologies
Table 3 below summarizes the amenities included in the design for the three bus stop typologies and their associated improvements.

Amenity Basic Enhanced Premium
ADA Compliant X X X
Bus Pole & Signage X X X
Bus Pad X X X
Bench - X X
Trash Receptacles Integrated X X
Lighting - - X
Preferred Shelter - - X
Variable Message Sign - - X
Table 3: Amenity Summary for Bus Stop Typology Designs

2.1.3 Accessibility Improvements
ADA Compliance
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a federal civil rights law guaranteeing equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities. MBL aims to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal regulations under the ADA within its transit system.

The last bus stop ADA compliance survey was done in August 2023 as a part of the City of Montebello’s ADA Transition Plan and Self-Evaluation – Public Rights-of-Way report. 151 bus stops were surveyed with none of them being deemed compliant. The existing conditions assessment for this project found that 84 percent of MBL bus stops are still not compliant with ADA Standards and do not adequately accommodate physically challenged riders.

As a part of the bus stop improvement project, bus stop infrastructure, landing pads, and sidewalks that are not ADA compliant should be upgraded to meet ADA standards.

Bus Stop Landing Pad
Bus boarding and alighting areas must comply with ADA and Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Guidelines, Section 810.2. This includes dimensions of 96 inches long by 60 inches wide, a slope no steeper than 1:48, sturdy surfaces, signs, public address systems, and connectivity to streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian paths. The ADA landing pad must be elevated above street level. Passenger loading zones must have vehicle pull-up spaces that are at least 20 feet long and 96 inches wide, with a vertical clearance of 114 inches at the vehicle access aisle.

Page 228 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 10 Distance from Curb
Sidewalks must be wide enough for two wheelchair passengers to pass each other and access aisles should be at least 60 inches wide for the full length of the vehicle pull-up space. In some places, sidewalks need to be widened to provide adequate access. In other places, existing infrastructure may be obstructing pathways and could be moved to ensure ADA compliance.

3.0 Cost Estimates for Bus Stop Improvements

3.1 Project Funding
This section details the rough order of magnitude cost estimate developed for the BSIP improvements. The MBL FY 2023-2025 Short Range Transit Plan set a total project cost of $2,713,000 in the Capital Project Summary, with $2,570,000 from federal funding sources and $143,000 from state and local funding.

3.2 Line by Line Cost Estimates

3.2.1 Methodology
Cost estimates were developed for the recommended bus stop improvements at all MBL stops. The estimate for the 174 stops within the city includes removal of existing infrastructure, materials and construction for new infrastructure, reconstruction to achieve ADA compliance, and installation of new infrastructure. The cost estimate for the 649 stops outside of the city of Montebello includes materials, construction, installation of new infrastructure, and ADA compliance updates. Infrastructure removal costs are not included for stops outside of the city since infrastructure at those locations is not necessarily owned by the City of Montebello.

The line-by-line cost estimates detailed in Error! Reference source not found. and Table 5 use unit costs for bus stop improvements multiplied by the number of stops where each will be implemented. The determinants of improvements are the bus stop typology, ADA violations, and location in or outside of the city. The following sections describe how infrastructure, construction, and other unit costs were determined.

Infrastructure Costs
Tolar Manufacturing provided a quote to MBL that serves as the basis for project infrastructure cost estimates like shelters, benches, and trash receptacles. The estimate adjusted these values based on the project-specific design specifications and various actual costs from local projects.

The Tolar 12’ Signature Sunset transit shelter shares key features with the MBL design, including powder-coated perforated metal panels, solar lighting in the shelter roof, and similar dimensions. Materials costs were scaled up to reflect the features of the premium design – custom perforation, backlit panels, and digital signage– based on estimated cost adjustments from Tolar and actual costs of similar local projects. Shelter delivery cost is based on the Tolar quote.

All new shelters will also need sidewalk removal and a 6-inch concrete slab, regardless of current conditions, for the area immediately grounding the shelter. This cost was estimated with construction and concrete costs from comparable local projects for a 13’ by 6’ sidewalk area. Shelter installation cost was estimated with construction costs from comparable local projects.

Tolar provided a cost estimate for their 72” Euro Model Bench, which was scaled up to reflect the increased cost of Montebello’s custom design concept. Bench installation and labor costs are based on comparable local projects.

The Tolar quote provides an estimate for their 22-gallon trash receptacle, with a perforated metal basket and inner liner, like the Montebello enhanced and premium design. Trash receptacle installation and labor is based on comparable local projects. For the small trash receptacles integrated on bus stop poles, the cost estimate is based on market rates for 10-gallon mounted waste receptacles.

Page 229 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 11 For pole removal and disposal, and then the furnishing and installation of a new pole and sign, the cost estimate is based on local projects and engineering judgment. Cost estimates for shelter, bench, and trash receptacle removal were also determined based on local project costs and engineering judgment.

The cost for NextBus real time information (RTI) signage is based on average cost of RTI digital signage projects for other Southern California transit agencies funded by the Federal Transportation Improvement Project (FTIP). The cost estimate for double-sided digital advertising displays was developed in conversation with Tolar. Both of these align with other Kimley-Horn cost database information.

Bus Stop Typologies
Each of the designated bus stop typologies – basic, enhanced, and premium – have different associated costs. For the line-by-line cost estimates shown in Table 4 and Table 5, bus stop typologies are totaled within and outside of the city.

Bus stop typology breakdown for the cost estimate is shown in Table 2.

All stops in and outside of the city require furnishing and installation of a new pole and sign. The cost estimate for basic stops in the City of Montebello that currently have a sign also includes the cost of removal and disposal of the existing pole. All basic stops will use the smaller integrated trash receptacle design.

In addition to the pole and sign, enhanced stops have the cost of a new bench and its installation. For the baseline estimate, each enhanced stop location accounts for the cost of one bench. Enhanced stops within the city require the cost to remove and dispose of the existing bench. The enhanced stops include the full-size trash receptable cost estimate.

Premium shelters will incur the highest cost, including the shelter, bench, pole and sign, and full-size trash receptacles.

For premium stops within city limits, infrastructure removal costs are factored into the estimate.

ADA Compliance Upgrades
Sidewalk improvements for ADA compliance will require coordination with the City of Montebello Public Works. During BSIP implementation, sidewalk upgrades may be handled separately from the construction and installation of bus stop infrastructure and will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

ADA Improvements at Premium Stops
The cost estimate includes reconstruction of sidewalk (assumed 12’ width) to 15’ on either side of the assumed 6’ by 12’ concrete shelter pad to correct ADA deficiencies. During actual construction, the amount of sidewalk to be reconstructed to address ADA violations will be location specific.

ADA Improvements at Enhanced and Basic Stops
The estimate includes sidewalk replacement costs for ADA deficiencies at basic and enhanced stops as well. For stops with a slope deficiency (greater than 2.08% cross slope or greater than 5% running slope) or wheelchair access deficiency, the estimate includes the cost for 360 square feet (12’ by 30’) of sidewalk to be replaced. The estimate similarly assumes 360 square feet of sidewalk reconstruction for stops where the landing pad is not compliant.

Passageway
Stops with less than a 36-inch passageway have the highest estimated cost to correct, since this will likely involve relocating utilities or other station furniture. The actual cost will be location-specific, depending on the passageway obstruction.

Page 230 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 12

3.2.2 Cost Estimate Breakdown
The following tables provide the total cost estimate for the bus stop improvements, separated by stops within the City of Montebello and stops outside of the city. These are summary tables; the detailed estimate with full sub-item breakdowns can be found in the Detailed Cost Estimate Tables section of the Appendix.

Bus Stop Improvements within the City of Montebello
This cost estimate includes the 174 bus stops within the City of Montebello, of which 65 are the basic typology, 60 are enhanced, and 49 are premium.

Item No. Description Unit Price Quantity Total Cost
1 Shelter removal and disposal $3,500 49 $171,500
2 Shelter $50,000 49 $2,450,000
3 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks at
shelter $8,880 43 $381,840
4 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks
w/o shelter $7,200 52 $374,400
5 Reconstruct sidewalks for landing pad $7,200 44 $316,800 6 Correct deficient passageway $25,000 17 $425,000
7 Bench removal and disposal $500 109 $54,500
8 Bench $1,500 109 $163,500
9 Pole removal and disposal $150 167 $25,050
10 Furnish and install pole and sign $1,200 174 $208,800 11 Trash receptacle removal and disposal $500 97 $48,500 12 Trash receptacle $1,950 109 $212,550
13 Integrated trash receptacle $300 65 $19,500
14 NextBus Digital Signs $17,000 49 $833,000
15 Digital Advertising $50,000 49 $2,450,000
Construction Subtotal $8,135,000
Soft Costs, Temporary, Indirect, and Contractor General Conditions Agency Costs 6% $488,100
Project / Construction Management 6% $488,100
Construction Survey 10% $813,500
Mobilization / Demobilization 10% $813,500
SWPPP / Inlet protection $500 $87,000
Maintenance of Vehicular and
Pedestrian Traffic $1,500 $261,000
Contractor General Conditions,
Insurance, Bonds, Fee 15% $1,220,300
Project Subtotal $12,307,000
Contingency 20% $2,461,000
Project Total $14,768,000
Table 4: BSIP Cost Estimate in the City of Montebello

Page 231 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 13 Bus Stop Improvements Outside of the City of Montebello This cost estimate includes the 649 bus stops within the City of Montebello, of which 243 are the basic typology, 199 are enhanced, and 207 are premium.

Item No. Description Unit Price Quantity Total Cost
1 Shelter removal and disposal $3,500 --
2 Shelter $50,000 207 $10,350,000
3 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks at
shelter $8,880 181 $1,607,280
4 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks
w/o shelter $7,200 243 $1,749,600
5 Reconstruct sidewalks for landing pad $7,200 93 $669,600 6 Correct deficient passageway $25,000 63 $1,575,000
7 Bench removal and disposal $500 --
8 Bench $2,000 407 $814,000
9 Pole removal and disposal $150 --
10 Furnish and install pole and sign $1,200 650 $780,000 11 Trash receptacle removal and disposal $500 --
12 Trash receptacle $1,950 407 $793,650
13 Integrated trash receptacle $300 243 $72,900
14 NextBus Digital Signs $17,000 207 $3,519,000
15 Digital Advertising $50,000 207 $10,350,000
Construction Subtotal $32,281,000
Soft Costs, Temporary, Indirect, and Contractor General Conditions Agency Costs 6% $1,936,900
Project / Construction Management 6% $1,936,900
Construction Survey 10% $3,228,100
Mobilization / Demobilization 10% $3,228,100
SWPPP / Inlet protection $500 $325,000
Maintenance of Vehicular and
Pedestrian Traffic $1,500 $975,000
Contractor General Conditions,
Insurance, Bonds, Fee 15% $4,842,200
Project Subtotal $48,753,000
Contingency 20% $9,751,000
Project Total $58,504,000
Table 5: BSIP Cost Estimate Outside of the City of Montebello

Page 232 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 14

4.0 Implementation Plan
The BSIP Implementation Plan was developed by examining stop conditions for all three typologies within and outside of the City of Montebello. Each stop has a condition score determined by the condition of amenities at the stop and the number of ADA violations. Implementation priority considers the stop condition and ridership to target improvements at locations that have the highest infrastructural needs and greatest volumes of people using and waiting for the bus.

4.1 Bus Stop Condition Ranking

4.1.1 Methodology
Combined Score for Stop Conditions and ADA Violations
First, bus stop conditions were assessed for the basic, enhanced, and premium stops in and outside of the City. In the bus stop inventory, each stop has a condition rating of 1 (hazardous) to 5 (excellent) for each of the 8 possible amenities at a stop – signage, lighting, shelter, bench, trash can, bike rack, landing pad, and sidewalk – or a rating of 0 if the stop does not have that amenity. For each stop, a total conditions score was calculated by taking the average of the condition ratings for all possible amenities.

The bus stop inventory also identified ADA violations at each stop location. There are five possible types of violations, which include a noncompliant landing pad, no wheelchair access, slope violation, passageway violation, or bench violation. Each bus stop was assigned an ADA score, with a maximum of 5 (excellent) for all categories being ADA compliant and a deduction for each ADA violation.

The final combined score was calculated as the average condition of all stop amenities and the ADA score.

Stop Condition Buckets: Good, Moderate, Poor
Within each bus stop typology, stops are assigned to be in Good, Moderate, or Poor condition. Stops in good condition have zero ADA violations. Moderate and Poor conditions are assigned relative to other stops of the same typology to account for the fact that enhanced and premium stops have more amenities and therefore can have a higher composite score. For noncompliant stops of each typology inside and outside of the City, stops with a below average combined score are categorized as Poor condition and stops with an above average combined score are in Moderate condition.

Table 6 below shows the state of bus stop conditions for each bus stop typology. Within the City, most stops are in Moderate or Poor condition. Only 22 out of the 174 stops within City limits are ADA compliant.

Page 233 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 15 City
Jurisdiction Bus Stop Typology ADA Compliant?
Bus Stop Condition from
Combined Amenity and ADA
Compliance Quality Score
Count
In the City of
Montebello Basic
Yes Good (no ADA violations) 22
No
Moderate 25
Poor 18
Enhanced No
Moderate 27
Poor 33
Premium No
Moderate 24
Poor 25
Outside of the
City of
Montebello
Basic
Yes Good (no ADA violations) 76
No
Moderate 81
Poor 86
Enhanced
Yes Good (no ADA violations) 20
No
Moderate 86
Poor 93
Premium
Yes Good (no ADA violations) 8
No
Moderate 99
Poor 100
Table 6: Bus Stop Conditions from Combined Amenities and ADA Compliance Score

Page 234 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 16

4.1.2 Conditions
Figure 7 shows the bus stops within the City of Montebello, categorized by the combined conditions and ADA compliance score. The stops in the best condition are mostly located on smaller, residential streets, while the stops in the poorest condition are located on major arterials like Whittier Boulevard, Beverly Boulevard, and Montebello Boulevard. Pair stops of the same typology tend to have similar conditions. A breakdown of stop conditions by stop type can be found in the Appendix.

Figure 7: Bus Stop Conditions in the City of Montebello based on Combined Amenity and ADA Compliance Score

Page 235 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 17

4.2 Implementation Priority

4.2.1 Methodology
The goal of the implementation plan is to identify where improvements can have the greatest immediate impact, so implementation priority considers both stop conditions and stop ridership. Stops in good condition with zero ADA violations are the lowest priority for improvement implementation. Stops in Moderate and Poor condition are further categorized by looking at whether they have above or below average ridership.

The stops in poor condition with above average monthly ridership are the highest priority for implementation, since they have the lowest quality amenities, most ADA improvements needed, and highest ridership and activity. The average monthly ridership is 374 in the city and 273 outside of the city, so those are the threshold for implementation groups.

Stops in moderate condition with above average ridership are the second highest priority for implementation. Stops in poor condition with below average ridership and in moderate condition with below average ridership should be next in a phased implementation, respectively. The stops assessed to be in good condition with no ADA violations are the lowest priority for implementation.

Table 7 and Table 8 show the number of stops in each implementation category within and outside of the City of Montebello.

Implementation Priority Conditions and Ridership Number of Stops P1 (Highest Priority) Poor conditions and above average ridership.

Recommended for immediate improvements.
29 P2 Moderate conditions and above average ridership. 22 P3 Poor conditions and below average ridership. 47
P4 Moderate conditions and below average ridership. 54
P5 (Lowest Priority) Best conditions. 22
Table 7: Implementation Priority in the City of Montebello Implementation Priority Conditions and Ridership Number of Stops P1 (Highest Priority) Poor conditions and above average ridership.

Recommended for immediate improvements.
86 P2 Moderate conditions and above average ridership. 65 P3 Poor conditions and below average ridership. 193
P4 Moderate conditions and below average ridership. 201 P5 (Lowest Priority) Best conditions. 104
Table 8: Implementation Priority Outside of the City of Montebello Stop Priority
Figure 8 shows the bus stops in the City of Montebello by BSIP implementation priority. The highest priority stops, with the worst conditions and most ridership, are concentrated along the east-west major arterials, Beverly Boulevard and Whittier Boulevard. The street with the most P1 stops, 15, is Whitter Boulevard, which is served by MBL Line 10.

Beverly Boulevard, served by MBL Lines 30 and the 90 Express, and Montebello Boulevard/Greenwood Avenue, served by MBL Line 20, also have high concentrations of P1 and P2 stops. All the lowest priority stops are basic stops, while the highest priority stops are mostly the premium and enhanced typology.

Implementation priority for stops outside of the City of Montebello is shown in Figure 9. The highest priority stops are concentrated along the routes for MBL Line 10 and Line 40 in the cities of East Los Angeles, Whittier, and Pico Rivera.

Page 236 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 18 Figure 8: Bus Stops by Implementation Priority in the City of Montebello

Page 237 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 19 Figure 9: Bus Stops by Implementation Priority Outside of the City of Montebello

Page 238 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 20

5.0 Next Steps
This memo provides rough order of magnitude cost estimates and an implementation plan for the MBL Bus Stop Improvement Project based on the existing conditions, bus stop inventory, and design recommendations that were developed in previous Project stages. Upgrading bus stop amenities and correcting ADA deficiencies will allow MBL to provide a safer, more comfortable experience for riders, within and outside of the city.

This bus stop assessment, cost estimate, and implementation plan will be used to assist MBL in developing a construction RFP to implement the recommended improvements. The implementation plan provides categories to inform a phased approach to prioritize locations that will fit with MBL’s available funding. This will ensure early implementation of the Project, improving customer experience in line with MBL’s goal to provide safe, clean, and reliable service to Montebello and surrounding communities.

Page 239 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 21 Appendix
Detailed Cost Estimate Tables
Cost Estimate in the City of Montebello
Item No. Description Subunit Price Subunit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Total Cost 1 Shelter removal and disposal $3,500 49 $171,500
2 Shelter $50,000 49 $2,450,000
2a Shelter materials $35,000
2b Shelter delivery $1,200
2c Remove sidewalk $5 72 $360
2d 6" concrete slab $20 72 $1,440
2e Shelter assembly and install $12,000
3 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks at shelter $20 444 $8,880 43 $381,840 4 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks w/o shelter $20 360 $7,200 52 $374,400 5 Reconstruct sidewalks for landing pad $20 360 $7,200 44 $316,800 6 Correct deficient passageway $25,000 1 $25,000 17 $425,000 7 Bench removal and disposal $500 109 $54,500
8 Bench $1,500 109 $163,500
9 Pole removal and disposal $150 167 $25,050
10 Furnish and install pole and sign $1,200 174 $208,800 11 Trash receptacle removal and disposal $500 97 $48,500 12 Trash receptacle $1,950 109 $212,550
13 Integrated trash receptacle $300 65 $19,500
14 NextBus Digital Signs $17,000 49 $833,000
15 Digital Advertising $50,000 49 $2,450,000
Construction Subtotal $8,135,000
Soft Costs, Temporary, Indirect, and Contractor General Conditions Agency Costs 6% $488,100
Project / Construction Management 6% $488,100
Construction Survey 10% $813,500
Mobilization / Demobilization 10% $813,500
SWPPP / Inlet protection $500 $87,000
Maintenance of Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic $1,500 $261,000 Contractor General Conditions, Insurance, Bonds, Fee 15% $1,220,300 Project Subtotal $12,307,000
Contingency 20% $2,461,000
Project Total $14,768,000
Table 9: Detailed Cost Estimate in the City of Montebello

Page 240 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 22 Cost Estimate Outside of the City of Montebello
Item No. Description Subunit Price Subunit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Total Cost 1 Shelter removal and disposal $3,500
2 Shelter $50,000 207 $10,350,000
2a Shelter materials $35,000
2b Shelter delivery $1,200
2c Remove sidewalk $5 72 $360
2d 6" concrete slab $20 72 $1,440
2e Shelter assembly and install $0 0 $12,000
3 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks at shelter $20 444 $8,880 181 $1,607,280 4 Reconstruct ADA deficient sidewalks w/o shelter $20 360 $7,200 243 $1,749,600 5 Reconstruct sidewalks for landing pad $20 360 $7,200 93 $669,600 6 Correct deficient passageway $25,000 1 $25,000 63 $1,575,000 7 Bench removal and disposal $500
8 Bench $2,000 407 $814,000
9 Pole removal and disposal $150
10 Furnish and install pole and sign $1,200 650 $780,000 11 Trash receptacle removal and disposal $500
12 Trash receptacle $1,950 407 $793,650
13 Integrated trash receptacle $300 243 $72,900
14 NextBus Digital Signs $17,000 207 $3,519,000
15 Digital Advertising $50,000 207 $10,350,000
Construction Subtotal $32,281,000
Soft Costs, Temporary, Indirect, and Contractor General Conditions Agency Costs 6% $1,936,900
Project / Construction Management 6% $1,936,900
Construction Survey 10% $3,228,100
Mobilization / Demobilization 10% $3,228,100
SWPPP / Inlet protection $500 $325,000
Maintenance of Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic $1,500 $975,000 Contractor General Conditions, Insurance, Bonds, Fee 15% $4,842,200 Project Subtotal $43,884,000
Contingency 20% $9,751,000
Project Total $58,504,000
Table 10: Detailed Cost Estimate Outside of the City of Montebello

Page 241 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 23 Additional Maps
Stop Conditions in the City of Montebello by Stop Typology Condition of Basic Stops in the City of Montebello
Figure 10: Condition of Basic Stops in the City of Montebello

Page 242 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 24 Condition of Enhanced Stops in the City of Montebello
Figure 11: Condition of Enhanced Stops in the City of Montebello

Page 243 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 25 Condition of Premium Stops in the City of Montebello
Figure 12: Condition of Premium Stops in the City of Montebello

Page 244 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 26 Bus Stop Assessment Inventory
Bus Stops in the City of Montebello
Stop ID Line Stop Name Typology ADA
Compliant?
Combined
Conditions and
ADA Score
Bus Stop
Condition
(determined by
combined score)
Average
Monthly
Ridership
Implementation
Priority
4032 40 Beverly & Montebello Premium No 3 Poor 3394.1 Immediate 1033 10 Whitter/Garfield Premium No 2 Poor 2878.7 Immediate 1047 10 Whitter & Montebello Premium No 3 Poor 1710.1 Immediate 2050 20 The Shops at Montebello Premium No 3 Poor 1432.3 Immediate 1035 10 Whitter/Concourse Premium No 3 Poor 1168.5 Immediate 2001 20 Telegraph/Gage Enhanced No 2 Poor 1145.3 Immediate 4089 40 Beverly/Wilcox Enhanced No 1 Poor 1005.8 Immediate 1088 10 Whittier/Greenwood Premium No 2 Poor 865.4 Immediate 2035 20 Montebello Mart Enhanced No 2 Poor 854.4 Immediate 1037 10 Whitter/21st Premium No 3 Poor 768.5 Immediate
3084 30 Garfield/Whitter Premium No 3 Poor 766.4 Immediate 4034 40 Beverly/Howard Premium No 3 Poor 734.7 Immediate 2011 20 Greenwood/Date Premium No 3 Poor 730.1 Immediate 4036 40 Beverly/Taylor Premium No 3 Poor 730.0 Immediate 4081 40 Beverly/Garfield Premium No 2 Poor 685.7 Immediate 3045 30 Garfield/Whitter Premium No 3 Poor 651.3 Immediate 1098 10 Whittier/Concourse Enhanced No 2 Poor 650.1 Immediate 2062 20 Montebello Mart Premium No 3 Poor 598.4 Immediate 4040 40 Beverly/Civic Center Enhanced No 2 Poor 504.1 Immediate 2037 20 Montebello/Victoria Premium No 3 Poor 478.9 Immediate 4028 40 Beverly/4th Enhanced No 1 Poor 470.5 Immediate
2015 20 Greenwood/Washington Enhanced No 2 Poor 460.8 Immediate

Page 245 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 27 4038 40 Beverly/Maple Enhanced No 2 Poor 439.8 Immediate 4058 40 Beverly/Bradshaw Enhanced No 2 Poor 438.8 Immediate 50114 50 Washington/Montebello Enhanced No 2 Poor 396.3 Immediate 1086 10 Whittier/Montebello Premium No 5 Moderate 3512.4 High 1082 10 Whittier/4th Premium No 4 Moderate 2067.4 High
2029 20 Montebello/Whitter Premium No 4 Moderate 1745.3 High 4044 40 Beverly/Wilcox Premium No 4 Moderate 1724.3 High 2072 20 Montebello/Whittier Premium No 4 Moderate 1702.4 High 4024 40 Beverly/Poplar Enhanced No 3 Moderate 1545.8 High 10100 10 Whittier/Garfield Premium No 4 Moderate 1322.5 High 4052 40 Beverly/Garfield Enhanced No 3 Moderate 1200.4 High 1090 10 Whittier/Taylor Premium No 4 Moderate 1113.9 High 2064 20 Montebello/Beverly Premium No 4 Moderate 1090.6 High 40101 40 Beverly/Montebello Enhanced No 3 Moderate 975.3 High 50116 50 Washington/Greenwood Premium No 4 Moderate 972.9 High 2007 20 Greenwood/Elm Basic No 2 Moderate 911.9 High
1092 10 Whittier/Maple Premium No 4 Moderate 905.8 High 1096 10 Whittier/21st Premium No 4 Moderate 892.8 High
1045 10 Whitter/Greenwood Premium No 4 Moderate 787.0 High 2009 20 Greenwood/Oakwood Enhanced No 3 Moderate 734.8 High 1094 10 Whittier/Vail Premium No 4 Moderate 692.4 High
1053 10 Whitter/2nd Premium No 4 Moderate 661.4 High
50107 50 Washington/Greenwood Enhanced No 4 Moderate 651.5 High 1041 10 Whitter/Maple Premium No 4 Moderate 614.0 High
1043 10 Whitter/Taylor Premium No 4 Moderate 543.8 High 4042 40 Beverly/20th Enhanced No 3 Moderate 534.0 High
1084 10 Whittier/6th Premium No 5 Moderate 508.6 High
2019 20 Greenwood/Beach Enhanced No 3 Moderate 508.1 High 1049 10 Whitter/6th Premium No 4 Moderate 399.8 High
4026 40 Beverly/2nd Enhanced No 2 Poor 371.1 Medium

Page 246 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 28 4077 40 Beverly/Bradshaw Basic No 0 Poor 352.7 Medium
4054 40 Beverly/San Clemente Enhanced No 2 Poor 329.8 Medium 50109 50 Washington/Montebello Enhanced No 1 Poor 296.5 Medium 4056 40 Beverly/Findlay Enhanced No 2 Poor 276.8 Medium 2003 20 Greenwood/Telegraph Enhanced No 2 Poor 271.7 Medium 50120 50 Washington/Vail Enhanced No 1 Poor 264.9 Medium 4095 40 Beverly/Maple Enhanced No 2 Poor 264.7 Medium
7006 70 Montebello Plaza Enhanced No 2 Poor 223.2 Medium 1039 10 Whitter/19th Enhanced No 1 Poor 217.3 Medium
4087 40 Beverly/Via Val Verde Basic No 1 Poor 207.8 Medium 4097 40 Beverly/Taylor Enhanced No 2 Poor 194.3 Medium
2017 20 Greenwood /School Enhanced No 2 Poor 193.1 Medium 2025 20 Montebello/Olympic Enhanced No 2 Poor 186.0 Medium 2023 20 Greenwood/Mines Enhanced No 2 Poor 178.6 Medium 2013 20 Greenwood/Frankel Premium No 2 Poor 166.8 Medium 50111 50 Washington/Bluff Enhanced No 1 Poor 162.3 Medium 2039 20 Montebello/Lincoln Enhanced No 2 Poor 158.3 Medium 9023 90 Taylor Ranch Basic No -2 Poor 149.9 Medium
4083 40 Beverly/Hay Basic No 1 Poor 147.1 Medium
4030 40 Beverly/6th Basic No 1 Poor 136.5 Medium
7010 70 Wilcox/Hay Enhanced No 2 Poor 128.7 Medium
4091 40 Beverly/20th Basic No 0 Poor 127.0 Medium
50118 50 Washington/Maple Enhanced No 2 Poor 119.3 Medium 2076 20 Montebello/Olympic Enhanced No 0 Poor 115.2 Medium 7043 70 Wilcox/Beverly Premium No 3 Poor 110.9 Medium
3070 30 Garfield/Via Campo-Paseo Enhanced No 1 Poor 99.0 Medium 7016 70 Wilcox/Beverly Enhanced No 2 Poor 92.1 Medium
2027 20 Montebello/Los Angeles Enhanced No 2 Poor 91.8 Medium 2090 20 Greenwood/Date Basic No 0 Poor 81.5 Medium
40111 40 Beverly/Bradley Enhanced No 2 Poor 77.9 Medium

Page 247 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 29 2033 20 Montebello/Madison Enhanced No 2 Poor 71.4 Medium 2094 20 Greenwood/Elm Basic No 0 Poor 69.3 Medium
4085 40 Beverly/Concourse Basic No 1 Poor 61.3 Medium
2074 20 Montebello/Los Angeles Enhanced No 1 Poor 60.2 Medium 2092 20 Greenwood/Oakwood Basic No 1 Poor 58.3 Medium
3076 30 Garfield/Via Acosta Enhanced No 1 Poor 55.0 Medium 3074 30 Garfield/Via San Delarro Enhanced No 1 Poor 54.8 Medium 7025 70 Mines/Maple Basic No 0 Poor 43.2 Medium
40115 40 Beverly/Paramount Basic No 1 Poor 34.7 Medium
40103 40 Beverly/6th Basic No 1 Poor 19.2 Medium
2066 20 Montebello/Harding Basic No -1 Poor 18.9 Medium 2054 20 Montebello/Costco Enhanced No 2 Poor 12.7 Medium 2053 20 Town Center/Kaiser Basic No 1 Poor 9.8 Medium
7087 70 Paramount & Arroyo NB Basic No 0 Poor 6.8 Medium 2096 20 Greenwood/Union Basic No 0 Poor 3.9 Medium
2098 20 Union/Gage Basic No 1 Poor 3.4 Medium
7003 70 Mines/Vail Basic No 1 Poor 2.4 Medium
2055 20 The Shops at Montebello Premium No 5 Moderate 355.8 Low 2031 20 Montebello/Cleveland Premium No 4 Moderate 352.3 Low 4046 40 Beverly/Via Val Verde Premium No 4 Moderate 326.3 Low 70390 70 Garfield/Whittier Premium No 4 Moderate 285.3 Low 40109 40 Beverly/Poplar Enhanced No 3 Moderate 283.3 Low 3078 30 Garfield/Beverly Premium No 5 Moderate 279.4 Low 4050 40 Beverly/Hay Enhanced No 3 Moderate 277.4 Low
2052 20 Montebello/Town Square Premium No 4 Moderate 250.9 Low 2070 20 Montebello/Cleveland Premium No 5 Moderate 195.2 Low 3051 30 Garfield/Beverly Premium No 4 Moderate 183.8 Low 4093 40 Beverly/Civic Center Basic No 2 Moderate 174.6 Low 4099 40 Beverly/10th Enhanced No 3 Moderate 158.8 Low
4079 40 Beverly/Findlay Enhanced No 3 Moderate 157.3 Low

Page 248 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 30 7007 70 Mines/Greenwood Basic No 2 Moderate 139.5 Low
50103 50 Washington/Vail Enhanced No 3 Moderate 127.2 Low 7001 70 Metrolink Premium No 4 Moderate 121.7 Low
50112 50 Washington/4th St Basic No 2 Moderate 113.8 Low 40105 40 Beverly/4th Premium No 4 Moderate 108.5 Low
3068 30 Garfield/Via Campo Enhanced No 4 Moderate 106.7 Low 3047 30 Garfield/Madison Enhanced No 3 Moderate 99.3 Low 4048 40 Beverly/Concourse Basic No 2 Moderate 90.9 Low
2068 20 Montebello/Madison Enhanced No 3 Moderate 83.9 Low 7020 70 Wilcox/Whittier Basic No 2 Moderate 79.4 Low
3057 30 Garfield/Via Altamira Basic No 2 Moderate 68.8 Low 2045 20 Montebello/Liberty Premium No 5 Moderate 54.2 Low 40107 40 Beverly/2nd Enhanced No 3 Moderate 49.3 Low
7051 70 Montebello Plaza - Wilcox &
Campo
Basic No 2 Moderate 47.4 Low
7041 70 Wilcox/Madison Basic No 2 Moderate 45.1 Low
7049 70 Wilcox/Hay Enhanced No 3 Moderate 44.3 Low
3059 30 Garfield/Via Paseo Enhanced No 3 Moderate 42.4 Low 2051 20 Town Ctr Dr/Paramount Basic No 2 Moderate 42.2 Low 3061 30 Garfield/Via Paseo-Campo Enhanced No 4 Moderate 37.1 Low 2049 20 Montebello/Town Square Premium No 4 Moderate 34.6 Low 2021 20 Greenwood/Carmelita Basic No 2 Moderate 31.9 Low 2056 20 Montebello/Liberty Basic No 2 Moderate 31.8 Low 7053 70 Montebello Plaza Enhanced No 3 Moderate 31.8 Low 3072 30 Garfield/Via Altamira Enhanced No 3 Moderate 31.3 Low 2041 20 Montebello/La Merced Basic No 2 Moderate 31.1 Low 2060 20 Montebello/La Merced Basic No 2 Moderate 27.8 Low 2088 20 Greenwood/Frankel Basic No 2 Moderate 27.4 Low
7014 70 Wilcox/Victoria Basic No 2 Moderate 26.7 Low
7045 70 Wilcox/Victoria Basic No 2 Moderate 22.7 Low

Page 249 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 31 3082 30 Garfield/Madison Enhanced No 3 Moderate 19.8 Low 7055 70 Via Campo/Markland Basic No 2 Moderate 17.3 Low 7012 70 Wilcox/Lincoln Basic No 3 Moderate 16.8 Low
7091 70 Paramount/Montebello Enhanced No 3 Moderate 16.7 Low 7008 70 Wilcox/Via Paseo Basic No 2 Moderate 15.1 Low
7047 70 Wilcox/Lincoln Basic No 2 Moderate 14.5 Low
2043 20 Montebello/Jefferson Basic No 2 Moderate 9.7 Low 7061 70 Town Center Dr/JC Penny Premium No 5 Moderate 8.3 Low 2058 20 Montebello/Jefferson Basic No 2 Moderate 5.3 Low 2047 20 Montebello/Costco Basic No 2 Moderate 5.3 Low
9036 90 Montebello Mart Premium No 4 Moderate 4.3 Low
1051 10 Whitter/4th Basic Yes 3 Best 185.2 Lowest
2078 20 Montebello/Mines Basic Yes 1 Best 129.8 Lowest
2086 20 Greenwood/Washington Basic Yes 3 Best 127.4 Lowest 3053 30 Garfield/Via Acosta Basic Yes 3 Best 119.5 Lowest 7009 70 Mines/Montebello Basic Yes 3 Best 98.3 Lowest
2005 20 Greenwood/Union Basic Yes 4 Best 85.2 Lowest
2082 20 Montebello/Beach Basic Yes 4 Best 79.5 Lowest
2080 20 Montebello/Carmelita Basic Yes 3 Best 71.9 Lowest 2084 20 Greenwood/School Basic Yes 3 Best 52.5 Lowest
7018 70 Wilcox/Madison Basic Yes 3 Best 47.3 Lowest
7023 70 Maple/Beach Basic Yes 3 Best 39.9 Lowest
3049 30 Garfield/Hay Basic Yes 3 Best 38.2 Lowest
7092 70 Paramount/Market Place Dr Basic Yes 3 Best 35.4 Lowest 3080 30 Garfield/Hay Basic Yes 3 Best 28.0 Lowest
7093 70 Paramount/Arroyo SB Basic Yes 3 Best 26.1 Lowest 70005 70 Mines/Maple S Basic Yes 3 Best 25.3 Lowest
3055 30 Garfield/Via San Delarro Basic Yes 3 Best 24.5 Lowest 7013 70 Montebello/Beach Basic Yes 3 Best 23.3 Lowest
7039 70 Wilcox/Whittier Basic Yes 3 Best 21.3 Lowest

Page 250 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 32 7011 70 Montebello/Hughes Basic Yes 3 Best 13.4 Lowest
7088 70 Paramount/Marketplace Basic Yes 3 Best 2.8 Lowest 7085 70 Hill/Arland Basic Yes 3 Best 1.1 Lowest

Page 251 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 33 Bus Stops Outside of the City of Montebello
Stop
ID Line City Stop Name Typology
Number of
ADA
Violations
Combined
Conditions
and ADA
Score
Bus Stop
Condition
(determined
by combined
score)
Average
Monthly
Ridership
Implementation
Group
1021 10 Commerce Whitter/Gerhart Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 3337 P1 (Highest Priority) 4067 40 East LA Beverly/Atlantic Premium 2 3.00 Poor 3291 P1 (Highest Priority) 4035 40 Los Angeles 4th/Soto Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 2421 P1 (Highest Priority) 1017 10 Commerce Whitter/Goodrich Basic 1 2.22 Poor 2366 P1 (Highest Priority) 4000 40 Whittier Beverly & Norwalk Enhanced 3 2.11 Poor 2123 P1 (Highest Priority) 1008 10 Whittier Whittier/Colima Premium 2 3.33 Poor 1857 P1 (Highest Priority) 1019 10 Commerce Whitter/Hoefner Enhanced 1 3.00 Poor 1731 P1 (Highest Priority) 10127 10 Whittier Whittwood Mall Premium 2 3.11 Poor 1676 P1 (Highest Priority) 1042 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Greenleaf Premium 2 3.22 Poor 1608 P1 (Highest Priority) 1078 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Paramount Premium 2 3.33 Poor 1556 P1 (Highest Priority) 4005 40 Los Angeles 6th/Flower Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 1535 P1 (Highest Priority) 40102 40 Los Angeles 4th/Soto Basic 1 2.22 Poor 1281 P1 (Highest Priority) 1060 10 Whittier Whittier/Norwalk Premium 2 3.44 Poor 1275 P1 (Highest Priority) 1091 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Milton Premium 2 3.33 Poor 1219 P1 (Highest Priority) 1044 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Comstock Premium 1 3.22 Poor 1151 P1 (Highest Priority) 1025 10 East LA Whittier/Leonard Premium 2 3.00 Poor 1087 P1 (Highest Priority) 1001 10 Monterey Park East L.A. College Premium 2 3.22 Poor 1075 P1 (Highest Priority) 1093 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Washington Premium 2 3.33 Poor 1010 P1 (Highest Priority) 4027 40 Los Angeles 4th/Gless Premium 2 3.11 Poor 1004 P1 (Highest Priority) 1050 10 Whittier Whittier/Sorenson Premium 3 3.00 Poor 955 P1 (Highest Priority) 5029 50 Los Angeles Washington & Broadway LA
E
Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 910 P1 (Highest Priority)
1080 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Myrtle Premium 2 3.33 Poor 891 P1 (Highest Priority)

Page 252 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 34 1004 10 Whittier Whittier/ Santa Gertrudes Premium 1 3.67 Poor 816 P1 (Highest Priority) 10128 10 East LA Atlantic/Pomona Premium 1 3.44 Poor 816 P1 (Highest Priority) 4029 40 Los Angeles 4th/Boyle Premium 1 3.22 Poor 805 P1 (Highest Priority) 10116 10 Commerce Whittier/Goodrich Premium 2 3.56 Poor 804 P1 (Highest Priority) 1002 10 Whittier Whittwood Mall 2nd stop Premium 2 3.11 Poor 800 P1 (Highest Priority) 1072 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Lindsey Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 796 P1 (Highest Priority) 1022 10 Whittier Whittier/Central Premium 2 3.44 Poor 741 P1 (Highest Priority) 50117 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Rosemead Premium 2 3.00 Poor 720 P1 (Highest Priority) 4049 40 East LA 3rd/Rowan Enhanced 2 2.89 Poor 706 P1 (Highest Priority) 1077 10 Whittier Whitter/Glengarry Enhanced 3 2.33 Poor 704 P1 (Highest Priority) 5047 50 Whittier Washington/Long Beach Basic 1 1.78 Poor 697 P1 (Highest Priority) 10109 10 Whittier Whittier/Painter Premium 2 3.56 Poor 694 P1 (Highest Priority) 40104 40 Los Angeles 4th/Chicago Enhanced 1 2.11 Poor 679 P1 (Highest Priority) 50104 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Rosemead Premium 2 3.00 Poor 676 P1 (Highest Priority) 5028 50 Whittier Mulberry/Mills Premium 1 3.00 Poor 627 P1 (Highest Priority) 1056 10 Whittier Whittier/Broadway Premium 2 3.33 Poor 621 P1 (Highest Priority) 1046 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Gregory Premium 4 3.33 Poor 609 P1 (Highest Priority) 4001 40 Los Angeles Beaudry & 5th Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 590 P1 (Highest Priority) 1099 10 Whittier Painter/Penn Premium 1 3.44 Poor 570 P1 (Highest Priority) 5009 50 Los Angeles 6th St/Hill Basic 1 1.78 Poor 544 P1 (Highest Priority) 5037 50 Los Angeles Washington/San Pedro Basic 1 1.78 Poor 528 P1 (Highest Priority) 10101 10 Whittier Painter/Mar Vista Premium 3 3.00 Poor 524 P1 (Highest Priority) 10106 10 East LA Whittier/Findlay Premium 2 3.33 Poor 514 P1 (Highest Priority) 5085 50 Commerce Washington/Atlantic Premium 3 3.22 Poor 506 P1 (Highest Priority) 1087 10 Whittier Whitter/Philadelphia Premium 2 3.11 Poor 497 P1 (Highest Priority) 1079 10 Whittier Whitter/Broadway Premium 1 3.22 Poor 494 P1 (Highest Priority) 1023 10 East LA Whitter/Keenan Premium 2 3.33 Poor 494 P1 (Highest Priority) 1062 10 West WhittierLos NietosWhittier/Redman Enhanced 4 2.11 Poor 492 P1 (Highest Priority) 1038 10 Whittier Philadelphia & Painter Enhanced 3 2.56 Poor 474 P1 (Highest Priority)

Page 253 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 35 4041 40 Los Angeles 4th/Fresno Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 473 P1 (Highest Priority) 10122 10 East LA Atlantic/6th Premium 1 3.44 Poor 464 P1 (Highest Priority) 1013 10 East LA Atlantic/Hubbard Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 452 P1 (Highest Priority) 2093 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Valley Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 436 P1 (Highest Priority) 1055 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Myrtle Premium 3 3.11 Poor 432 P1 (Highest Priority) 1032 10 Whittier Painter/Mar Vista Premium 3 3.22 Poor 418 P1 (Highest Priority) 1085 10 West WhittierLos NietosWhitter/Sorensen Enhanced 3 2.22 Poor 411 P1 (Highest Priority) 1029 10 East LA Whitter/Saybrook Premium 2 3.22 Poor 409 P1 (Highest Priority) 10110 10 East LA Whittier/Keenan Premium 2 3.22 Poor 409 P1 (Highest Priority) 1095 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Painter Premium 1 3.33 Poor 407 P1 (Highest Priority) 1014 10 Whittier Whittier/Ocean View Enhanced 2 3.00 Poor 397 P1 (Highest Priority) 5090 50 Whittier Washington/Broadway SF
SP W
Basic 1 2.00 Poor 393 P1 (Highest Priority)
5044 50 Whittier Painter/Cullen Premium 1 3.33 Poor 390 P1 (Highest Priority) 50115 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Crossway Premium 2 3.11 Poor 380 P1 (Highest Priority) 10148 10 Los Angeles Cal State Los Angeles Enhanced 2 3.11 Poor 379 P1 (Highest Priority) 4072 40 East LA 3rd/Mednik Premium 1 3.22 Poor 377 P1 (Highest Priority) 1048 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Whittier Premium 2 3.00 Poor 369 P1 (Highest Priority) 3027 30 Commerce Garfield/Telegraph Basic 1 1.89 Poor 363 P1 (Highest Priority) 50100 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Passons Premium 2 3.00 Poor 360 P1 (Highest Priority) 50138 50 Commerce Washington/Atlantic Premium 3 3.00 Poor 360 P1 (Highest Priority) 4070 40 East LA 3rd/LaVern Premium 2 3.11 Poor 349 P1 (Highest Priority) 50141 50 Whittier Washington/Lambert Premium 1 3.56 Poor 335 P1 (Highest Priority) 10107 10 Whittier Painter/Russell Premium 2 3.33 Poor 331 P1 (Highest Priority) 50181 50 Whittier Mulberry/Painter Premium 1 3.22 Poor 330 P1 (Highest Priority) 5086 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Sorensen Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 328 P1 (Highest Priority) 1009 10 East LA Atlantic/Eagle Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 320 P1 (Highest Priority) 1020 10 Whittier Whittier/Laurel Premium 2 3.22 Poor 320 P1 (Highest Priority)

Page 254 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 36 10120 10 East LA Atlantic/Hubbard Premium 2 3.44 Poor 318 P1 (Highest Priority) 10131 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Collegian Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 313 P1 (Highest Priority) 4086 40 East LA 3rd/Rowan Enhanced 3 2.22 Poor 309 P1 (Highest Priority) 10124 10 East LA Atlantic/Eagle Premium 2 3.33 Poor 302 P1 (Highest Priority) 10104 10 East LA Whittier/Saybrook Premium 1 3.33 Poor 296 P1 (Highest Priority) 3041 30 East LA Garfield/Olympic Premium 1 3.44 Poor 293 P1 (Highest Priority) 1012 10 Whittier Whittier/Gunn Enhanced 3 2.67 Poor 277 P1 (Highest Priority) 4074 40 East LA 3rd/McDonnell Premium 3 3.00 Poor 276 P1 (Highest Priority) 1005 10 East LA Atlantic & Pomona Premium 4 2.67 Moderate 5298 P2 1003 10 Monterey Park Atlantic/Cesar Chavez Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 4345 P2 1015 10 East LA Whitter/Atlantic Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 3440 P2 1074 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Rosemead Premium 4 2.33 Moderate 3285 P2 10114 10 East LA Whittier/Hoeffner Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 2005 P2 4007 40 Los Angeles Olive/5th Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 1958 P2 10118 10 East LA Whittier/Atlantic Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 1760 P2 1061 10 Pico Rivera Whitter & Rosemead Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 1612 P2 2083 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Garvey North
Bound
Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 1300 P2
4068 40 East LA Beverly/Atlantic Premium 2 2.33 Moderate 1234 P2 3020 30 Alhambra Garfield/Main Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 1154 P2 2018 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Valley Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 1140 P2 4061 40 East LA 3rd/Mednik Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 1089 P2 4016 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Acacia Enhanced 5 1.11 Moderate 1062 P2 1024 10 Whittier Painter/Ramona Enhanced 5 1.33 Moderate 1019 P2 2026 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Garvey Near
Side
Premium 4 2.00 Moderate 976 P2
10112 10 Commerce Whittier/Gerhart Premium 4 2.44 Moderate 963 P2 1063 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Lindsey Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 938 P2 3081 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Garvey Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 898 P2 1068 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Passons Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 883 P2

Page 255 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 37 2002 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Las Tunas Premium 1 2.78 Moderate 852 P2 1006 10 Whittier Whittier/Scott Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 829 P2 4013 40 Los Angeles 4th/Los Angeles Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 815 P2 1076 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Columbia Enhanced 3 2.00 Moderate 793 P2 1011 10 East LA Atlantic/6th Premium 2 2.22 Moderate 786 P2 50110 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Paramount Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 736 P2 40110 40 Los Angeles 4th/Gless Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 730 P2 1059 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Columbia Premium 4 2.67 Moderate 702 P2 4096 40 Los Angeles 4th/Fresno Enhanced 1 2.00 Moderate 701 P2 5092 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Norwalk Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 678 P2
1028 10 Whittier Painter/La Cuarta Premium 5 2.78 Moderate 676 P2 40108 40 Los Angeles 4th/Boyle Premium 3 2.44 Moderate 670 P2 3048 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Garvey Enhanced 3 1.33 Moderate 658 P2 2030 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Garvaila Premium 3 1.89 Moderate 628 P2 5080 50 Whittier Washington/Lambert Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 536 P2 3013 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Florence Premium 2 2.33 Moderate 533 P2 1067 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Passons Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 528 P2 50227 50 La Mirada Adelfa & Ashgrove Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 524 P2 1040 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Washington Premium 5 2.78 Moderate 508 P2 3036 30 Alhambra Garfield/Valley Enhanced 3 2.00 Moderate 507 P2 2073 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Keim Premium 4 2.00 Moderate 502 P2 3001 30 South Gate Firestone Pl/Garfield Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 487 P2 5014 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Imperial Premium 1 2.78 Moderate 481 P2 2004 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Broadway Premium 2 2.00 Moderate 467 P2 40100 40 Los Angeles 4th/Mott Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 458 P2 4015 40 Los Angeles 4th/Wall Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 457 P2 4 10 East LA Ramona/Campus Premium 3 2.22 Moderate 448 P2 4018 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Paramount Premium 5 2.56 Moderate 442 P2 4051 40 East LA 3rd/Gage Enhanced 1 1.78 Moderate 419 P2

Page 256 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 38 4012 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Durfee Enhanced 5 1.22 Moderate 416 P2 4003 40 Los Angeles 4th/Figueroa Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 401 P2 4090 40 Los Angeles 3rd/Indiana Premium 3 2.44 Moderate 399 P2 4033 40 Los Angeles 4th/Chicago Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 393 P2 3050 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Newmark Enhanced 5 1.56 Moderate 382 P2 3019 30 Commerce Garfield/Randolph Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 349 P2 1034 10 Whittier Painter/Penn Enhanced 2 1.00 Moderate 341 P2 10103 10 Whittier Painter/Walnut Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 337 P2 4045 40 Los Angeles 4th/Lorena Basic 3 0.89 Moderate 333 P2 2065 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Hill Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 322 P2
50162 50 Los Angeles Soto/Olympic Premium 1 2.33 Moderate 315 P2 4059 40 East LA 3rd/McDonnell Premium 3 2.11 Moderate 309 P2 4055 40 East LA 3rd/Eastern Enhanced 5 1.89 Moderate 307 P2 4069 40 East LA Beverly/Hillview Enhanced 1 1.67 Moderate 287 P2 4084 40 East LA 3rd/Gage Enhanced 5 2.00 Moderate 279 P2 50154 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Grande Vista Enhanced 1 2.00 Moderate 275 P2 10111 10 Whittier Whittier/Laurel Enhanced 3 2.44 Poor 272 P3 50134 50 Commerce Washington/Eastern Premium 2 3.00 Poor 262 P3 5068 50 Whittier Pickering/Philadelphia Premium 3 3.00 Poor 260 P3 2008 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Pearl Enhanced 2 3.11 Poor 255 P3 4073 40 East LA Beverly/Sadler Basic 1 1.67 Poor 252 P3 1018 10 Whittier Whittier/Michigan Premium 1 3.22 Poor 251 P3 3015 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Loveland Enhanced 2 2.22 Poor 244 P3 1064 10 Whittier Whittier/Esperanza Enhanced 3 2.11 Poor 238 P3 3028 30 Alhambra Garfield/Park Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 236 P3 50106 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Crossway Enhanced 3 2.67 Poor 234 P3 10161 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Mednik Premium 1 3.00 Poor 232 P3 50121 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Passons Enhanced 2 2.22 Poor 229 P3 5089 50 Commerce Washington/Eastern Premium 2 3.22 Poor 229 P3

Page 257 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 39 4075 40 East LA Beverly/Gerhart Enhanced 1 2.22 Poor 227 P3 1010 10 Whittier Whittier/Mills Premium 2 3.44 Poor 223 P3 5018 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Leffingwell Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 221 P3 50173 50 Whittier Painter/Whittier Enhanced 1 2.22 Poor 216 P3 1057 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Paramount Enhanced 2 2.22 Poor 209 P3 50128 50 Commerce Washington/Telegraph Basic 2 1.78 Poor 206 P3 1016 10 Whittier Whittier/Strub Premium 3 3.11 Poor 204 P3 5011 50 Los Angeles Hill/7th St Basic 1 2.00 Poor 204 P3 4004 40 Whittier Beverly/Carley Basic 1 2.00 Poor 202 P3 4019 40 Los Angeles 4th/Towne Basic 1 1.78 Poor 201 P3
10102 10 East LA Whittier/Via Del Or Premium 2 3.22 Poor 189 P3 10126 10 East LA Atlantic/4th Premium 2 3.00 Poor 185 P3 1054 10 West WhittierLos NietosWhittier/Western Enhanced 3 2.89 Poor 180 P3 30116 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Florence Enhanced 3 2.33 Poor 175 P3 3042 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Hellman Premium 2 3.00 Poor 175 P3 5069 50 Los Angeles Grande Vista/Olympic Enhanced 1 2.11 Poor 172 P3 50130 50 Commerce Washington/Leo Premium 2 3.11 Poor 172 P3 10123 10 Whittier Whittier & Colima Premium 3 3.00 Poor 170 P3 5088 50 Whittier Washington/Ridgeview Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 169 P3 4082 40 East LA 3rd/Sunol Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 167 P3
1069 10 Pico Rivera Whitter/Millux Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 166 P3 3093 30 Alhambra Garfield/Valley BL Basic 1 1.89 Poor 163 P3 3008 30 South
Pasadena
Atlantic/Garfield Basic 1 1.78 Poor 160 P3
5026 50 Whittier Mulberry/Ruoff Basic 1 2.56 Poor 159 P3 1075 10 Whittier Whitter/Norwalk Premium 2 3.44 Poor 158 P3 7063 70 Rosemead The Shops at Montebello -
Robinsons May
Premium 2 3.11 Poor 154 P3
4071 40 East LA Beverly/Margaret Basic 2 2.00 Poor 154 P3

Page 258 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 40 3005 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Fostoria Premium 1 3.33 Poor 152 P3 50113 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Paramount Basic 1 1.67 Poor 151 P3 10162 10 East LA Belvedere Park Premium 1 3.67 Poor 151 P3 2071 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Rush Basic 1 1.67 Poor 151 P3
5094 50 Whittier Washington/Rockne Premium 3 3.11 Poor 147 P3 2089 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Hellman Premium 1 3.11 Poor 137 P3 3038 30 Alhambra Garfield/Norwood Enhanced 2 2.22 Poor 133 P3 4076 40 East LA 3rd/Ford Basic 4 1.89 Poor 125 P3
5039 50 Los Angeles Washington/Griffith Basic 1 1.67 Poor 124 P3 50127 50 Whittier Washington/Miller Grove Premium 2 3.44 Poor 121 P3 6015 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Slauson Premium 2 3.11 Poor 121 P3 6001 60 Pico Rivera Telegraph & Arrington Premium 1 3.00 Poor 119 P3 5070 50 Whittier Pickering/Penn Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 119 P3 5007 50 Los Angeles 6th St/Flower Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 118 P3 50177 50 Whittier Painter/Lambert Premium 1 3.33 Poor 117 P3 6012 60 Pico Rivera Pico Terminal - Jackson &
Passons
Premium 2 3.11 Poor 116 P3
2067 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Celito Premium 2 3.11 Poor 115 P3
1058 10 Whittier Whittier/Glengarry Enhanced 4 2.44 Poor 113 P3 5074 50 Whittier Pickering/Walnut Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 110 P3 10150 10 East LA Eastern/City Terrace Premium 1 3.56 Poor 110 P3 5084 50 Whittier Washington/Appledale Basic 1 2.44 Poor 110 P3 5082 50 Whittier Washington/Crowndale Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 109 P3 10113 10 Whittier Whittier/Jacmar Enhanced 3 2.56 Poor 109 P3 1083 10 Whittier Whitter/Hadley Basic 1 1.78 Poor 109 P3 50182 50 Los Angeles Washington/Central Basic 1 1.78 Poor 107 P3 3064 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Riggin Premium 1 3.11 Poor 106 P3 50175 50 Whittier Painter/Cullen Basic 1 2.33 Poor 104 P3

Page 259 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 41 4043 40 Los Angeles 4th/Concord Basic 1 1.78 Poor 104 P3 2012 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Central Basic 1 1.67 Poor 99 P3 10159 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/McDonnell Premium 2 3.33 Poor 97 P3 5015 50 Los Angeles Hill/9th St Basic 1 2.44 Poor 94 P3 50135 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Sorensen Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 93 P3
50193 50 Whittier Mulberry/Ruoff Basic 2 2.00 Poor 92 P3 6047 60 Pico Rivera Rosemead/Whittier Premium 3 3.22 Poor 90 P3 40116 40 Los Angeles 4th/Hewitt Basic 1 2.11 Poor 90 P3 50201 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Leffingwell Enhanced 1 2.78 Poor 89 P3 3099 30 Alhambra Garfield/Los Higos Basic 2 2.00 Poor 88 P3 50105 50 Los Angeles Washington/Maple Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 86 P3 10166 10 Monterey Park ELAC Frontage Enhanced 2 2.78 Poor 84 P3 50156 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Dacotah Basic 1 1.78 Poor 83 P3 50151 50 Whittier Pickering/Penn Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 81 P3 30106 30 Commerce Garfield/Slauson Enhanced 1 2.11 Poor 80 P3 2014 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Chestnut Basic 1 1.89 Poor 79 P3 3066 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Fernfield Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 77 P3 2087 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Dorothy Premium 2 3.00 Poor 77 P3 2085 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Whitmore Premium 2 3.11 Poor 74 P3 3043 30 East LA Garfield/Allston Basic 1 2.33 Poor 73 P3 5005 50 Los Angeles 4th St/Figueroa Basic 1 1.78 Poor 72 P3 4080 40 East LA 3rd/Marianna Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 72 P3 5096 50 Whittier Washington/Pioneer Enhanced 1 2.11 Poor 71 P3 6005 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Telegraph Enhanced 3 2.56 Poor 70 P3 5031 50 Los Angeles Washington/Main Basic 1 1.89 Poor 69 P3 3097 30 Alhambra Garfield/San Marino Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 68 P3 30112 30 Commerce Garfield/Gage Premium 2 3.33 Poor 67 P3 10136 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Mednik Premium 1 3.44 Poor 65 P3 7097 70 Monterey Park Potrero Grande/Arroyo SB Basic 1 1.67 Poor 65 P3

Page 260 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 42 1097 10 Whittier Painter/Wardman Basic 2 2.11 Poor 65 P3 6027 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Washington Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 63 P3 50187 50 Whittier Mulberry/Calmada Basic 1 2.22 Poor 61 P3 3026 30 Alhambra Garfield/Beacon Enhanced 3 2.11 Poor 60 P3 50176 50 Long Beach Washington/Long Beach Basic 1 1.78 Poor 58 P3 3011 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Clara Premium 2 3.33 Poor 55 P3 30114 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Loveland Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 55 P3 10155 10 East LA Eastern/Hammel Basic 1 1.89 Poor 54 P3 9009 90 Los Angeles Olive/G. K. Way Premium 2 3.00 Poor 54 P3 40113 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Pine Basic 1 1.78 Poor 53 P3 10119 10 Whittier Whittier/Gunn Enhanced 2 2.89 Poor 53 P3 50140 50 Commerce Washington/Ransom Enhanced 2 2.11 Poor 52 P3 2044 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Delta Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 50 P3 5035 50 Los Angeles Washington/Trinity Basic 1 1.78 Poor 48 P3 50149 50 Whittier Pickering/Mar Vista Premium 1 3.44 Poor 46 P3 5098 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Pico Vista Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 46 P3 5020 50 Whittier La Mirada/Hornell Basic 1 1.78 Poor 45 P3 10130 10 Monterey Park Atlantic/Riggin Premium 2 3.11 Poor 44 P3 7096 70 San Gabriel Potrero Grande/Mooney Basic 1 1.78 Poor 43 P3 30123 30 Alhambra Huntington/Stoneman Enhanced 4 2.11 Poor 40 P3 10142 10 East LA Eastern/Floral Enhanced 1 2.78 Poor 40 P3 5045 50 Los Angeles Washington/Hooper Basic 1 2.11 Poor 39 P3 50184 50 Los Angeles Washington/Griffith Basic 1 1.78 Poor 39 P3 7098 70 Monterey Park Potrero Grande/Saturn Basic 1 2.11 Poor 38 P3 6026 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Washington Enhanced 1 2.11 Poor 37 P3 2097 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Chestnut Enhanced 2 2.44 Poor 37 P3 50125 50 Whittier Washington/Pioneer Basic 1 1.78 Poor 36 P3 50174 50 Los Angeles Washington/Alameda Basic 1 1.78 Poor 35 P3 50123 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Pico Vista Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 34 P3 10125 10 Whittier Whittier/Scott Premium 2 3.22 Poor 33 P3

Page 261 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 43 2061 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/E. Village Basic 1 2.22 Poor 32 P3 10163 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Vancouver Premium 2 3.11 Poor 29 P3 50179 50 Whittier Painter/Oval Basic 1 1.78 Poor 29 P3
5010 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Foster Basic 2 2.00 Poor 29 P3 50183 50 Whittier Mulberry/Greening Basic 1 2.11 Poor 27 P3 5053 50 Los Angeles Washington/Santa Fe
Bridge
Basic 2 1.67 Poor 27 P3
5012 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Tacuba Basic 1 1.67 Poor 25 P3 5071 50 Los Angeles Grande Vista/Pico Basic 1 1.89 Poor 25 P3 30120 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Ira Premium 1 3.33 Poor 23 P3 10145 10 East LA Eastern/City Terrace Basic 1 1.89 Poor 22 P3 20103 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Pearl Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 21 P3 3031 30 Commerce Garfield/Yates Basic 1 2.00 Poor 21 P3 50170 50 Los Angeles Washington/Santa Fe
Bridge
Basic 1 2.11 Poor 20 P3
30111 30 Alhambra Garfield/Woodward Enhanced 4 2.11 Poor 19 P3 6057 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Dork Basic 2 2.00 Poor 19 P3 6018 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Mines Enhanced 1 2.44 Poor 19 P3 40134 40 Los Angeles 5th/Flower Premium 1 3.22 Poor 17 P3 50219 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Ocaso Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 17 P3 10135 10 East LA Cesar Chavez / Belvedere
Park
Enhanced 1 2.56 Poor 17 P3
6021 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Call Enhanced 3 2.11 Poor 17 P3 6002 60 Pico Rivera Manning/Beverly Basic 1 1.78 Poor 16 P3 6009 60 Pico Rivera Passons/La Docena Basic 2 1.67 Poor 16 P3 2038 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Sierra Bonita Enhanced 3 2.11 Poor 15 P3
50196 50 Los Angeles Hil/Venice Basic 1 2.33 Poor 15 P3 10137 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Dangler Premium 1 3.67 Poor 14 P3 7095 70 Commerce Hill/Arland Basic 1 1.78 Poor 14 P3

Page 262 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 44 40131 40 Whittier Beverly/Carley Premium 2 3.33 Poor 13 P3 10134 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Vancouver Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 12 P3 2099 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Central Basic 1 1.67 Poor 12 P3 40117 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Acacia Basic 1 1.78 Poor 11 P3 5051 50 Los Angeles Washington/Alameda -R/R Basic 2 1.67 Poor 11 P3 50164 50 Los Angeles Soto/Rio Vista Basic 2 1.67 Poor 11 P3 10164 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Westcott Enhanced 2 2.44 Poor 11 P3 10153 10 East LA Eastern/Marianna Basic 1 2.00 Poor 10 P3 3002 30 Alhambra Huntington/Story Enhanced 1 2.78 Poor 10 P3 50210 50 Los Angeles Hill/7th St Basic 1 2.11 Poor 10 P3 10143 10 East LA Eastern/Sheriff Rd Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 10 P3 10139 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Ford Enhanced 2 3.00 Poor 9 P3 10140 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Humphreys Premium 2 3.44 Poor 9 P3 6053 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Beverly Rd. Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 9 P3 6035 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Reichling Basic 2 1.67 Poor 9 P3 50209 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Foster Road Basic 1 1.78 Poor 9 P3 6014 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Almo Enhanced 1 2.67 Poor 8 P3 6043 60 Pico Rivera Pico Terminal - Jackson &
Passons
Enhanced 2 2.67 Poor 8 P3
50198 50 Los Angeles Hill/Pico Basic 1 2.56 Poor 8 P3
6017 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Rivera Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 8 P3 7030 70 Commerce Flotilla/Garfield Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 8 P3 6051 60 Pico Rivera Rosemead/Beverly Rd. Basic 1 1.78 Poor 8 P3 50188 50 Los Angeles Washington/Trinity Basic 1 1.89 Poor 8 P3 50217 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Excelsior Basic 1 1.78 Poor 8 P3 7084 70 San Gabriel Hill/Potrero Grande Basic 1 1.78 Poor 7 P3 7082 70 Monterey Park Potrero Grande/Market
Place
Basic 1 1.67 Poor 7 P3
50207 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Tacuba Basic 1 2.11 Poor 7 P3 7086 70 San Gabriel Paramount/Hill Premium 1 3.11 Poor 6 P3

Page 263 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 45 6065 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Sandown Basic 1 2.11 Poor 6 P3 6040 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Shade Basic 2 2.00 Poor 5 P3 30108 30 Commerce Garfield/Slauson-RR Enhanced 1 2.33 Poor 5 P3 6034 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Rivera Enhanced 2 2.33 Poor 3 P3 10144 10 East LA Eastern/Hauck Basic 2 1.78 Poor 3 P3
50202 50 Los Angeles Hill/11th St Premium 2 3.22 Poor 3 P3 6048 60 Pico Rivera Telegraph/Serapis Enhanced 4 2.44 Poor 2 P3 6039 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Loch Lomond Basic 1 1.67 Poor 2 P3 6024 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Wampler Basic 1 2.11 Poor 2 P3 6061 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Banta Enhanced 2 2.22 Poor 2 P3 50213 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Alicante Basic 1 2.11 Poor 1 P3 30115 30 Alhambra Garfield/Alhambra Basic 2 1.67 Poor 1 P3 10147 10 Los Angeles Cal State Los Angeles Enhanced 2 2.44 Poor 0 P3 3079 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Newmark Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 262 P4 4060 40 East LA Beverly/Gerhart Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 259 P4 3023 30 Commerce Garfield/Slauson Enhanced 4 1.56 Moderate 253 P4 1066 10 Pico Rivera Whittier/Millux Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 252 P4 5033 50 Los Angeles Washington/Maple Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 252 P4 2048 20 Rosemead Montebello/Robinsons May Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 246 P4 4092 40 Los Angeles 4th/Lorena Basic 4 1.33 Moderate 244 P4 1089 10 Whittier Philadelphia/Gregory Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 243 P4 2036 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Potrero Grande Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 237 P4 4094 40 Los Angeles 4th/Concord Basic 1 1.22 Moderate 233 P4 2095 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Scott Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 229 P4 40112 40 Los Angeles 4th/Anderson Basic 4 0.67 Moderate 227 P4 5027 50 Los Angeles Hil/Venice Enhanced 1 1.89 Moderate 225 P4 3094 30 Commerce Garfield/Washington Enhanced 2 1.11 Moderate 212 P4 10117 10 Whittier Whittier/Ocean view Enhanced 3 1.89 Moderate 205 P4 3083 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Emerson Enhanced 4 2.00 Moderate 204 P4

Page 264 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 46 2042 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Grandview Premium 3 2.56 Moderate 203 P4
40119 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Rosemead Basic 2 1.44 Moderate 201 P4 3007 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Muller Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 198 P4 4020 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Pine Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 197 P4 5004 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Rosecrans Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 196 P4 5001 50 Los Angeles Beaudry/5th St Ln 50 Enhanced 2 1.89 Moderate 191 P4 3087 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Hellman Premium 5 2.67 Moderate 189 P4 40106 40 Los Angeles 4th/Cummings Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 189 P4 2022 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Hellman Premium 2 2.22 Moderate 187 P4 3046 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Emerson Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 184 P4 5095 50 Commerce Washington/Telegraph Premium 2 2.00 Moderate 181 P4 3024 30 Alhambra Garfield/Commonwealth Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 181 P4 40120 40 Los Angeles 3rd/Central Premium 1 2.44 Moderate 180 P4 3035 30 Commerce Garfield/Washington Premium 3 2.44 Moderate 170 P4 50122 50 Whittier Washington/Garfield Basic 1 1.44 Moderate 169 P4 4065 40 East LA Beverly/Woods Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 169 P4 1030 10 Whittier Painter/Walnut Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 167 P4 3085 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Garfield Med Ctr Premium 3 2.56 Moderate 167 P4 4078 40 East LA 3rd/Eastern Enhanced 4 1.89 Moderate 165 P4 3030 30 Alhambra Garfield/Los Higos Enhanced 2 1.67 Moderate 163 P4 50160 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Orme Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 163 P4 6022 60 Pico Rivera El Rancho High School Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 162 P4 10156 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Eastern Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 159 P4 3065 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Riggin Enhanced 1 1.89 Moderate 146 P4 5024 50 Whittier Mulberry/Colima Basic 3 1.44 Moderate 140 P4 3037 30 Commerce Garfield/Flotilla Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 134 P4 1071 10 Whittier Whitter/Pioneer Enhanced 3 1.89 Moderate 134 P4 2075 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Klingerman Premium 2 2.22 Moderate 132 P4 40122 40 Los Angeles 3rd/San Pedro Enhanced 2 1.67 Moderate 123 P4

Page 265 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 47 3092 30 Commerce Garfield/Flotilla Premium 5 1.56 Moderate 123 P4 1026 10 Whittier Painter/Russell Basic 4 1.22 Moderate 119 P4 10154 10 East LA Eastern/Floral Enhanced 2 1.89 Moderate 118 P4 2059 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Walnut Grove Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 117 P4 3052 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Grandridge Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 117 P4 30125 30 Alhambra Huntington/Monterey Basic 1 1.44 Moderate 115 P4 5093 50 Commerce Washington/Leo Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 114 P4 2046 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Rose Glen Basic 3 1.44 Moderate 108 P4 1036 10 Whittier Painter/Wardman Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 107 P4 2057 20 Rosemead Town Center/ Montebello
Blvd
Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 104 P4
50136 50 Commerce Washington/O Neill Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 103 P4 3022 30 Alhambra Garfield/Bay State Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 103 P4 50191 50 Whittier Mulberry/Mills Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 103 P4 50126 50 Commerce Washington/Saybrook Basic 2 1.00 Moderate 100 P4 50101 50 Whittier Washington/Garfield Basic 3 1.22 Moderate 99 P4 50133 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Allport Enhanced 3 1.33 Moderate 97 P4
5040 50 Whittier Painter/Oval Basic 2 1.11 Moderate 91 P4 5043 50 Los Angeles Washington/Naomi Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 89 P4 50124 50 Commerce Washington/Gayhart Basic 2 1.11 Moderate 87 P4 30101 30 Alhambra Garfield/Park Enhanced 4 2.00 Moderate 87 P4 10160 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Dangler Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 86 P4 40121 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Durfee Enhanced 2 1.89 Moderate 85 P4 2063 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Delta Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 83 P4 3044 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Garfield Med Ctr Premium 2 2.33 Moderate 82 P4 3010 30 Alhambra Garfield/Pine Enhanced 4 1.11 Moderate 80 P4 10132 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Schoolside Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 80 P4 50153 50 Whittier Pickering/Philadelphia Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 80 P4 6006 60 Pico Rivera Rosemead Beverly Rd Enhanced 2 2.00 Moderate 78 P4

Page 266 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 48 5073 50 Los Angeles Washington/Grande Vista Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 77 P4 30102 30 Commerce Garfield/Telegraph Enhanced 5 1.22 Moderate 75 P4 3009 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Park Lane Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 74 P4 6029 60 Pico Rivera El Rancho High School Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 74 P4 3012 30 Alhambra Garfield/McLean Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 70 P4 3095 30 Alhambra Garfield/Shorb Enhanced 4 2.00 Moderate 70 P4 3060 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Elmgate Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 68 P4 3069 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Elmgate Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 67 P4 3090 30 East LA Garfield/Ferguson Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 67 P4 6000 60 Pico Rivera San Gabriel River Pkwy Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 67 P4 20101 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Mission Premium 1 2.44 Moderate 66 P4 2034 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/La Merced Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 64 P4 5036 50 Whittier Mulberry/Laurel Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 64 P4 3077 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Graves Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 63 P4 3040 30 Alhambra Garfield/Glendon Enhanced 3 1.33 Moderate 63 P4 3032 30 Alhambra Garfield/San Marino Enhanced 2 2.00 Moderate 62 P4 3063 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Pomona Enhanced 2 1.00 Moderate 62 P4 5017 50 Los Angeles Hill/Olympic Premium 2 2.22 Moderate 62 P4 4025 40 Los Angeles 4th/Anderson Basic 3 1.11 Moderate 61 P4 40128 40 Los Angeles Hill/3rd Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 61 P4 6031 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Balfour Enhanced 3 1.89 Moderate 59 P4 40123 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Sandoval Basic 3 1.22 Moderate 59 P4 50142 50 Commerce Washington/Ayers Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 58 P4 7094 70 San Gabriel Hill/South Gabriel Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 57 P4 6011 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Shade Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 57 P4 40114 40 Los Angeles 4th/Merrick Basic 2 1.44 Moderate 57 P4 6004 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Beverly Rd. Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 57 P4 5091 50 Commerce Washington/Commerce Premium 3 2.22 Moderate 56 P4 40124 40 East LA 3rd/Los Angeles Basic 1 1.56 Moderate 54 P4 4008 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Abbeywood Basic 3 1.44 Moderate 54 P4

Page 267 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 49 2024 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Emerson Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 53 P4 10158 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Ford Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 53 P4 30100 30 Commerce Garfield/Elm Premium 5 2.56 Moderate 53 P4 2032 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Klingerman Premium 3 2.44 Moderate 53 P4 3018 30 Alhambra Garfield/Woodward Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 48 P4 6007 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Sunglow Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 48 P4 2069 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Sierra Bonita Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 47 P4 50144 50 Commerce Washington/Arrowmill Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 46 P4 5008 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Civic Center Enhanced 2 2.00 Moderate 45 P4 50186 50 Los Angeles Washington/San Pedro Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 45 P4 50189 50 Whittier Mulberry/Gunn Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 44 P4 3075 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Maronde Way Enhanced 2 1.67 Moderate 42 P4 50180 50 Los Angeles Washington/Naomi Enhanced 1 1.67 Moderate 42 P4 10165 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Schoolside Enhanced 5 1.56 Moderate 41 P4 3004 30 San Marino Huntington/Granada Enhanced 3 1.89 Moderate 40 P4 3071 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Coral View Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 40 P4 5034 50 Whittier Mulberry/Maryknoll Premium 2 2.33 Moderate 39 P4 3089 30 Alhambra Garfield/Glendon Way Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 38 P4 3016 30 Alhambra Garfield/Grand Enhanced 4 1.67 Moderate 38 P4 50150 50 Los Angeles Washington/Grande Vista Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 38 P4 50132 50 Commerce Washington/Commerce Premium 3 2.56 Moderate 37 P4 3073 30 Monterey Park Garfield/El Repetto Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 37 P4 40126 40 Los Angeles 3rd/Spring Basic 1 1.44 Moderate 36 P4 2040 20 South San
Gabriel
San Gabriel/Celito Enhanced 3 1.89 Moderate 36 P4
3025 30 Commerce Garfield/Bandini Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 35 P4 50195 50 Whittier Mulberry/Colima Premium 2 2.44 Moderate 33 P4 3054 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Maronde Enhanced 3 1.56 Moderate 32 P4 10115 10 Whittier Whittier/Strub Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 32 P4

Page 268 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 50 5087 50 Commerce Washington/O Neill Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 32 P4 3006 30 San Marino Huntington/ El Molino Enhanced 5 1.78 Moderate 32 P4 30104 30 Commerce Garfield/Bandini Basic 3 1.11 Moderate 31 P4 30110 30 Commerce Garfield/Randolph Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 31 P4 10146 10 East LA Ramona/Eastern Premium 3 2.89 Moderate 31 P4 5097 50 Commerce Washington/Saybrook Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 30 P4 3086 30 East LA Garfield/Allston Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 30 P4 3034 30 Alhambra Garfield/Shorb Enhanced 2 2.00 Moderate 29 P4 50185 50 Whittier Mulberry/Maryknoll Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 29 P4 10152 10 East LA Eastern/Sheriff Rd Basic 3 1.44 Moderate 28 P4 3091 30 Alhambra Garfield/Norwood Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 28 P4 50190 50 Whittier Washington/Maple Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 27 P4 3056 30 Monterey Park Garfield/El Repetto Enhanced 3 2.00 Moderate 26 P4 3014 30 Alhambra Garfield/Alhambra Enhanced 5 1.56 Moderate 25 P4 30122 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Cecilia Basic 1 1.44 Moderate 25 P4 2077 20 Rosemead San Gabriel/Garvalia Premium 4 2.00 Moderate 25 P4 5081 50 Commerce Washington/Ayers Premium 2 2.67 Moderate 25 P4 6033 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Mines Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 24 P4 6071 60 Pico Rivera Woodford/Banta Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 24 P4 30126 30 South Gate Firestone BL/Garfield Premium 3 2.33 Moderate 24 P4 3033 30 Commerce Garfield/Malt Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 22 P4 3098 30 Commerce Garfield/Yates Basic 3 1.00 Moderate 21 P4 10141 10 East LA Eastern/Hammel Basic 3 1.56 Moderate 21 P4 30103 30 Alhambra Garfield/Beacon Enhanced 4 1.89 Moderate 21 P4 6069 60 Pico Rivera Woodford/Sandoval Basic 2 1.44 Moderate 20 P4 10138 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/McDonnell Premium 3 2.78 Moderate 19 P4 30118 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Clara Premium 2 2.89 Moderate 18 P4 5099 50 Commerce Washington/Gayhart Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 17 P4 30124 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Fostoria Premium 1 2.67 Moderate 17 P4 50148 50 Whittier Washington/Indiana Basic 1 1.11 Moderate 17 P4

Page 269 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 51 7083 70 San Gabriel Potrero Grande/Arroyo NB Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 16 P4 6059 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Harrell Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 16 P4 6020 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Balfour Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 16 P4 6016 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Reichling Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 15 P4 3067 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Floral Basic 2 1.00 Moderate 15 P4 50146 50 Commerce Washington/Oak Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 15 P4 50178 50 Los Angeles Washington/Hooper Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 14 P4 5016 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Granada Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 14 P4 30105 30 Alhambra Garfield/Commonwealth Enhanced 2 1.56 Moderate 13 P4 7099 70 Monterey Park Potrero Grande/Markland
SB
Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 13 P4
5075 50 Whittier Washington/Indiana Enhanced 3 1.44 Moderate 13 P4 40127 40 Whittier Beverly/Pioneer Premium 3 2.67 Moderate 11 P4 5077 50 Commerce Washington/Oak Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 10 P4 10133 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Westcott Enhanced 4 1.78 Moderate 9 P4 50206 50 Los Angeles Hill/9th St Premium 2 2.56 Moderate 9 P4 6055 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Beverly Blvd. Enhanced 2 2.00 Moderate 9 P4 40125 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Abbeywood Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 9 P4 6063 60 Pico Rivera Durfee/Gallatin Enhanced 3 2.00 Moderate 7 P4 6030 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Rex Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 7 P4 5083 50 Commerce Washington/Hepworth Premium 3 2.56 Moderate 6 P4 50168 50 Whittier Washington/Railroad Bridge Basic 2 1.11 Moderate 6 P4 5055 50 Los Angeles Washington/Railroad Bridge Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 6 P4 3062 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Arlight Basic 1 1.44 Moderate 5 P4 6023 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Foxbury Basic 2 1.56 Moderate 5 P4 50221 50 La Mirada Adelfa/Santa Gertrudes Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 5 P4 50215 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Rosecrans Enhanced 2 1.78 Moderate 5 P4 3058 30 Monterey Park Garfield/Keller Enhanced 2 1.33 Moderate 5 P4 50203 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Granada Basic 2 1.33 Moderate 4 P4 5079 50 Commerce Washington/Arrowmill Enhanced 3 1.67 Moderate 4 P4

Page 270 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 52 40129 40 Whittier Beverly/Alder Premium 2 2.78 Moderate 3 P4 6044 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Sunglow Basic 2 1.22 Moderate 3 P4 30113 30 Alhambra Garfield/Grand Enhanced 4 2.00 Moderate 2 P4 6041 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Glen Canyon Basic 2 1.44 Moderate 2 P4 30121 30 Alhambra Garfield/Atlantic Enhanced 4 1.67 Moderate 2 P4 30119 30 Alhambra Garfield/Pine Basic 4 1.11 Moderate 1 P4 6038 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Myron Basic 1 1.33 Moderate 1 P4 6042 60 Pico Rivera Passons/La Docena Enhanced 3 1.78 Moderate 1 P4 3021 30 Commerce Garfield/Randolph-Slauson Basic 3 1.33 Moderate 0 P4 6025 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Danbridge Basic 2 0.67 Moderate 0 P4 6013 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Myron Basic 1 0.89 Moderate 0 P4 4009 40 Los Angeles 4th/Broadway Basic 0 2.33 Good 2764 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5061 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Soto Enhanced 0 2.44 Good 879 P5 (Lowest Priority) 10108 10 East LA Whittier/Leonard Basic 0 2.11 Good 817 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4037 40 Los Angeles 4th/Mott Enhanced 0 2.78 Good 733 P5 (Lowest Priority) 1007 10 East LA Atlantic/4th Basic 0 2.44 Good 723 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5038 50 Whittier Painter/Mulberry Enhanced 0 2.44 Good 660 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4011 40 Los Angeles 4th/Main Basic 0 2.00 Good 579 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4098 40 Los Angeles 4th/Evergreen Enhanced 0 2.44 Good 572 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4017 40 Los Angeles 4th/San Pedro Basic 0 2.33 Good 570 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4039 40 Los Angeles 4th/Evergreen Enhanced 0 2.22 Good 562 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4047 40 East LA 3rd/Indiana Basic 0 2.11 Good 442 P5 (Lowest Priority) 2000 20 San Gabriel South Pine St & East Live
Oak
Basic 0 1.89 Good 438 P5 (Lowest Priority)
1027 10 East LA Whitter/Findlay Basic 0 2.00 Good 428 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5041 50 Los Angeles Washington/Central Enhanced 0 2.33 Good 404 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4021 40 Los Angeles 4th/Alameda Basic 0 1.56 Good 394 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50129 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Norwalk Basic 0 2.33 Good 379 P5 (Lowest Priority)

Page 271 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 53 50131 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Broadway SF
SP E
Basic 0 1.89 Good 369 P5 (Lowest Priority)
4057 40 East LA 3rd/Ford Enhanced 0 2.56 Good 355 P5 (Lowest Priority) 2010 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Mission Basic 0 1.89 Good 317 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4010 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Sandoval Basic 0 2.22 Good 316 P5 (Lowest Priority) 2020 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Marshall Basic 0 1.78 Good 276 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5022 50 Whittier Mulberry/La Mirada Enhanced 0 2.33 Good 271 P5 (Lowest Priority) 1073 10 West WhittierLos NietosWhitter/Redman Basic 0 2.00 Good 264 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4063 40 East LA 3rd/La Verne Basic 0 2.33 Good 264 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4062 40 East LA Beverly/Sadler Basic 0 2.00 Good 260 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4053 40 East LA 3rd/Downey Rd Enhanced 0 3.00 Good 247 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5042 50 Whittier Painter/Lambert Premium 0 3.33 Good 233 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50166 50 Los Angeles Soto/Washington Enhanced 0 2.44 Good 232 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4064 40 East LA Beverly/Margaret Basic 0 1.89 Good 232 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5076 50 Whittier Pickering/Washington Premium 0 3.56 Good 224 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4023 40 Los Angeles 4th/Merrick Basic 0 1.33 Good 201 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5023 50 Los Angeles Hill/Pico Basic 0 2.56 Good 169 P5 (Lowest Priority) 3088 30 East LA Garfield/Olympic Basic 0 2.11 Good 167 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5072 50 Whittier Pickering/Mar Vista Premium 0 3.56 Good 163 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5078 50 Whittier Washington/Putman Premium 0 3.78 Good 162 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5049 50 Los Angeles Washington/Alameda Enhanced 0 2.11 Good 159 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50145 50 Whittier Pickering/Washington Premium 0 3.56 Good 158 P5 (Lowest Priority) 1052 10 Whittier Whittier/Hadley Basic 0 2.44 Good 149 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4066 40 East LA Beverly/Hillview Basic 0 1.78 Good 147 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50158 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Camulos Basic 0 2.11 Good 147 P5 (Lowest Priority) 3003 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Eastern Premium 0 3.11 Good 141 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5057 50 Los Angeles Soto/Washington Enhanced 0 2.67 Good 138 P5 (Lowest Priority) 3039 30 Commerce Garfield/Ferguson Premium 0 2.56 Good 134 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50205 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Imperial Basic 0 2.33 Good 109 P5 (Lowest Priority)

Page 272 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 54 10167 10 Monterey Park Cesar Chavez/Collegian Basic 0 2.22 Good 109 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5065 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Camulos Enhanced 0 2.22 Good 109 P5 (Lowest Priority) 1031 10 East LA Whitter/Via Del Oro Basic 0 2.78 Good 94 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5030 50 Whittier Mulberry/Gunn Basic 0 2.56 Good 93 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50143 50 Whittier Washington/Putman Premium 0 2.78 Good 86 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4088 40 Los Angeles 3rd/Ditman Basic 0 2.33 Good 80 P5 (Lowest Priority) 2091 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Marshall Basic 0 1.78 Good 76 P5 (Lowest Priority) 1081 10 West WhittierLos NietosWhitter/Western Basic 0 2.33 Good 75 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5021 50 Los Angeles Hill/12th St Basic 0 2.56 Good 73 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50197 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Mulberry Enhanced 0 2.89 Good 70 P5 (Lowest Priority) 2016 20 San Gabriel San Gabriel/Scott Basic 0 1.89 Good 63 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50137 50 Santa Fe
Springs
Washington/Appledale Basic 0 2.00 Good 63 P5 (Lowest Priority) 30109 30 Alhambra Garfield/Main Basic 0 2.33 Good 60 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5013 50 Los Angeles Hill/8th St Enhanced 0 2.56 Good 56 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5002 50 La Mirada Rosecrans/Jalon Basic 0 1.89 Good 54 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50119 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Loch Alene Basic 0 2.33 Good 50 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5067 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Dacotah Basic 0 2.67 Good 50 P5 (Lowest Priority) 3029 30 Commerce Garfield/Elm Basic 0 1.78 Good 49 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50152 50 Los Angeles Grande Vista/Lorena Basic 0 2.11 Good 49 P5 (Lowest Priority) 40132 40 Los Angeles 5th/Grand Basic 0 2.33 Good 48 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4031 40 Los Angeles 4th/Cummings Basic 0 2.33 Good 44 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50147 50 Whittier Pickering/Walnut Basic 0 1.78 Good 42 P5 (Lowest Priority) 40118 40 Los Angeles 3rd/Alameda Basic 0 1.89 Good 41 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5032 50 Whittier Mulberry/Calmada Enhanced 0 2.67 Good 41 P5 (Lowest Priority) 10157 10 East LA Cesar Chavez/Humphreys Basic 0 2.33 Good 40 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6036 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Slauson Basic 0 1.89 Good 35 P5 (Lowest Priority) 9067 90 East LA Beverly/Atlantic E (Express) Basic 0 2.44 Good 33 P5 (Lowest Priority) 9026 90 Los Angeles Spring & 2nd Basic 0 2.00 Good 33 P5 (Lowest Priority)

Page 273 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 55 5063 50 Los Angeles Olympic/Orme Enhanced 0 2.44 Good 31 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50139 50 Whittier Washington/Rivera Basic 0 1.78 Good 29 P5 (Lowest Priority) 10121 10 Whittier Whittier/Mills Basic 0 2.44 Good 25 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50108 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Phaeton Basic 0 2.11 Good 20 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50102 50 Pico Rivera Washington/Loch Alene Basic 0 2.22 Good 19 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6028 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Danbridge Basic 0 1.78 Good 18 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50212 50 Los Angeles 5th St/Hill Basic 0 2.22 Good 14 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5019 50 Los Angeles Hill/11th St Basic 0 2.11 Good 13 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50194 50 Los Angeles Hill/Washington Basic 0 1.56 Good 11 P5 (Lowest Priority) 9020 90 Los Angeles Spring/1st Basic 0 2.67 Good 9 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6067 60 Pico Rivera Cate/Chappelle Basic 0 1.56 Good 9 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50200 50 Los Angeles Hill/12th St Enhanced 0 3.00 Good 9 P5 (Lowest Priority) 7081 70 Monterey Park Potrero Grande/Markland N Basic 0 1.78 Good 8 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5006 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Alicante Basic 0 1.67 Good 8 P5 (Lowest Priority) 4014 40 Pico Rivera Beverly/Rosemead Basic 0 2.22 Good 7 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5059 50 Los Angeles Soto/Rio Vista Enhanced 0 2.33 Good 6 P5 (Lowest Priority) 3096 30 Commerce Garfield/Malt Basic 0 1.89 Good 6 P5 (Lowest Priority) 10105 10 Whittier Painter/La Cuarta Basic 0 1.11 Good 5 P5 (Lowest Priority) 5025 50 Los Angeles Hill/14th St Enhanced 0 2.56 Good 5 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6037 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Bexley Basic 0 1.78 Good 5 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50208 50 Los Angeles Hill/8th St Basic 0 2.22 Good 5 P5 (Lowest Priority) 30117 30 Alhambra Garfield/McLean Basic 0 2.00 Good 4 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50172 50 Los Angeles Washington/Alameda/RR Basic 0 2.11 Good 4 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50192 50 Los Angeles Washington & Broadway LA
W
Basic 0 1.11 Good 4 P5 (Lowest Priority)
3017 30 Bell Gardens Garfield/Gage Basic 0 2.00 Good 3 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50199 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Hornell Basic 0 2.56 Good 3 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6003 60 Pico Rivera Serapis/Telegraph Basic 0 2.56 Good 3 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6046 60 Pico Rivera Passons/Telegraph Basic 0 2.56 Good 3 P5 (Lowest Priority) 50211 50 La Mirada La Mirada/Civic Center Basic 0 2.22 Good 1 P5 (Lowest Priority)

Page 274 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – Bus Stop Assessment and Improvement Technical Memo Page 56 50204 50 Los Angeles Hill/Olympic Basic 0 1.33 Good 1 P5 (Lowest Priority) 40130 90 Los Angeles Hill/5th Basic 0 2.33 Good 1 P5 (Lowest Priority) 6049 60 Pico Rivera Rosemead/Olympic Basic 0 2.33 Good 0 P5 (Lowest Priority)

Page 275 of 840 ends

ATTACHMENT B
City of Montebello
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) No. 24-7
Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services October 26th, 2023

ONLINE PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ONLY THROUGH PLANET BIDS
NOTE: Updates, changes, or addendums to the RFP are posted at:
https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/33072/portal-home

Page 276 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
2 TABLE OF CONTENT
Section Page(s)
INTRODUCTION 4
COVER LETTER 5
TIMETABLE & SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 6
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION CHECKLIST 7
SECTION 1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 8
Proposal Format and Submittal
Examination of Proposal Documents
SECTION 2 - GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 9-16
Addenda
Clarifications
Discrepancies and Misunderstandings
Withdrawals of Proposal
References
Proposal Signatures
Pre Contractual Expenses
City of Montebello Rights
Licensing, Permits, and Taxes
Responsibility for Compliance with Legal Requirements
Confidentiality and Public Record
Joint Offers
Company Personnel
Single Proposal Response
Protest Procedures
Incorporation of Proposal into Agreement
Time of Completion
Payment
Contract Documents
Scope of Contract
Performance of Work
Award of Contract
Point of Contact
Evaluation of Proposals
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
SECTION 3 - QUALIFICATIONS 17
SECTION 4 - SCOPE OF WORK 18-21
SECTION 5 - FORM OF CONTRACT (SAMPLE) 22- 32

Page 277 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
3 SECTION 6 - FORMS AND CERTIFICATIONS 33-56
Letter of Transmittal
Exhibit A - Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement and Waiver of Subrogation and Contribution
Exhibit B – References
Exhibit C – Insurance
Exhibit D – Cost Proposal Sheet
Exhibit E - Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation Exhibit F – Bidder’s List of Subcontractor (DBE and Non- DBE) Exhibit F – Federal Requirements

Page 278 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
4 INTRODUCTION
The City of Montebello (City), Montebello Bus Lines (MBL), is soliciting proposals from qualified consultants to provide an in-depth Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services to improve the agency’s transit system.

The City operates MBL to provide reliable and efficient public transportation services to the residents of Montebello and neighboring communities. As the third-largest municipal bus system in Los Angeles County, MBL proudly serves approximately 2.6 million passengers annually throughout the communities of Alhambra, Bell Gardens, San Gabriel, Boyle Heights, Commerce, Downtown Los Angeles, East Los Angeles, La Mirada, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, South Gate, and Whittier.

MBL’s transit system consists of a fleet of sixty-six (67) 35ft-40ft buses (three electric, twenty hybrid, and forty-four Compress Natural Gas (CNG) buses), one 25ft cutaway shuttle, nearly 1,000 bus stops, and 2 transit hubs. MBL buses travel in highly visible corridors throughout various communities. These corridors include colleges and universities, retail areas, and other commercial and industrial areas.

This Request for Proposal (RFP) seeks to secure the most qualified consultant to perform an in-depth analysis of the City of Montebello’s bus shelters and evaluate overall structural needs to provide services to the various customers that MBL serves. The project will act as a guide to improve bus shelters and also facilitate a future construction RFP which will follow the guidelines the consultant provides in their final report.

The Scope of Work will include the deliverables to be prioritized and submitted to MBL as follows:
• Bus stop Inventory and Assessment Report.
• Design Recommendations.
• Amenity Recommendations.
• Plan and Design of Development Phase.
• Cost Assessments outlined in Tasks.
• Timeline or schedule to complete each Task.

Page 279 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
5 DATE: October 26th, 2023
ATTENTION: PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO.24-7
TITLE: CITY OF MONTEBELLO (CITY) and MONTEBELLO BUS LINES (MBL)

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (BSIP) CONSULTING SERVICES The City of Montebello (City), Montebello Bus Lines (MBL), is soliciting proposals (Proposals) from highly qualified consultants (Consultants) to provide an in-depth Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services to improve the agency’s transit system.

A Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 14th, 2023. The meeting will convene at 10:00 AM Pacific Standard Time in the Transportation Building located at 400 South Taylor Avenue, Montebello.

All correspondence, communications, and contact concerning any aspect of this solicitation or offers shall be only with the following person [or his designated representative if applicable] (hereinafter, the “City’s Point of Contact”).

Name: Matt Lightner
Title: Management Analyst
Address: 400 S. Taylor Ave.

Montebello, CA 90640
Telephone: (323) 558-1625 ext.1344
E-mail: [email protected]
Only substantive inquiries will receive a response. All substantive questions submitted in writing as outlined below will be responded to according to the guidelines contained herein. Responses will be in writing and will be provided to all prospective Proposers and placed on the City’s website. Responses to questions or comments regarding this RFP provided by any other department, or employee, other than the contact person set forth above shall not be considered valid and the City will not be bound by any such comments or responses. Inquiries received via telephone or orally in person will not receive a response.

Proposals must be received by Thursday, December 21st, 2023, 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time and submitted in accordance with the instructions contained in this RFP. No exceptions will be granted regardless of reason or circumstances.

All Proposals must contain an original signature by an authorized officer of the company.

The successful Proposer will be required to comply with all applicable Equal Opportunity Laws and Regulations. The City hereby notifies all prospective Proposers that the City will require each Proposer

Page 280 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
6 affirmatively demonstrate that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises are afforded full opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in part or whole under this RFP and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, gender, age, or national origin in consideration for an award.

The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to accept all or any part of any proposal, to waive any informality or minor irregularities in any proposal received to the extent permitted by law and where such action best serves the interest of the City, and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective proposal received.

The City is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of its programs and/or services based on race, color, or national origin per FTA Circular 4704.1 and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ("Title VI"). In addition to Title VI, MBL also prohibits discrimination based on sex, age, or disability.

Any person who believes he or she has been subjected to discrimination under Title VI can file a complaint with MBL. For more information on MBL’s Civil Rights Program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact:

Name: Adrianna Kendricks
Title: Director of Transportation
Address: 400 S. Taylor Ave.

Montebello, CA 90640
Telephone: (323) 558-1625
Fax Number: (323) 887-4643
E-mail: RideMBL.com
You may also contact the Federal Coordination and Compliance Office, Civil Rights Division at the Title VI Hotline: 888-TITLE-06 (888-848-5306) or send a letter to:

U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Federal Coordination and Compliance Section, NWB
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530
More information on Title VI is available from the Justice Department online at www.justice.gov

TIMETABLE & SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Scheduled Tasks Scheduled Date
Issuance of RFP Thursday October 26th, 2023
Pre-Proposal Meeting Tuesday November 14th, 2023, at 10:00 AM PST Deadline to Submit Questions Tuesday November 28th, 2023, at 3:00 PM PST Responses to Questions Provided Thursday December 7th, 2023 Deadline to Submit Proposals Thursday December 21st, 2023, at 3:00 PM PST Presentations & Intent to Award Week of January 4th, 2024

Page 281 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
7 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION CHECKLIST
This checklist must be completed and returned with the Proposal. Failure to return this checklist may be cause for considering the Proposal non-responsive.

Description Section/
Page
Proposer shall
initial here
1 Proposal Page # 8
2 Letter of Transmittal Page # 33
3 Licensing, Permits, Certificates, and Taxes Page # 11 4 Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement and Waiver of Subrogation and Contribution
Exhibit A
5 References Exhibit B
6 Insurance Exhibit C
7 Cost Proposal Sheet Exhibit D
8 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation Exhibit E 9 Bidder’s List of Subcontractor (DBE and Non-DBE) Exhibit F 10 Federal Requirements Exhibit G

OPTIONAL ITEMS
11 Requests for exceptions or deviations. Page # 8
Company Name:

Name of Proposer initialing document (print):

The email address of Company Contact:

Signature:

Title:

Date:

Page 282 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
8 SECTION 1 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMITTAL
Proposals can be submitted via the https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/33072/portal-home Portal (accessed through the City of Montebello’s official website at https://cityofmontebello.hosted2.civiclive.com/cms/One.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839) up to the hour of 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 21st, 2023.

All Proposals must contain an original signature by an authorized officer of the company. Proposals received after the above-listed date and time will not be considered.

Proposals shall not include a photocopy of the following:
· INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
· QUALIFICATIONS
· SCOPE OF WORK
Proposals shall be typed, single-spaced, and submitted on 8 1/2“x11” paper. Proposals shall not include any unnecessarily elaborate or promotional material. Proposals may not be modified or corrected after being opened unless an addendum is issued requesting resubmissions. Proposals will not be valid until all information has been verified and the Proposers' references have been checked. All Proposals shall be accompanied by a completed and signed Letter of Transmittal provided as a part of this RFP.

All requests for exceptions or deviations as a result of this RFP shall be identifiable by a separate section of the Proposer’s submitted Proposal for review by the City. It shall be the right of the City to accept or reject any portion of the submitted requests.

Proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the form prescribed herein. Failure to respond in this manner may render the Proposal non-responsive. Unauthorized conditions, limitations, or provisions attached to a Proposal will render the Proposal non-conforming and non-responsive and may cause its rejection. The completed Proposal shall be without interlineations, alterations, or erasures. Proposers submitting basic conforming Proposals may choose to submit alternate Proposals as complete and separate offers if the alternate Proposal offers technical or other improvements or modifications, which are to the overall benefit to the City. All alternate Proposals must be submitted in writing and included with the original proposal, conforming to the requirements as stated herein. No verbal modifications will be accepted.

Proposal documents shall be deemed to include by reference each one of the following:

1. Request for Proposal (RFP)

2. Addenda to RFP

3. Supplements to RFP

Page 283 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
9 4. All other required forms

EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS
By submitting a Proposal, Proposer represents that: (1) Proposer has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the Scope of Work required under this RFP, (2) Proposer comprehends all conditions that may impact the Proposal, (3) Proposer has reviewed all addenda, and (3) Proposer is capable of providing the equipment, goods, and services necessary to perform the Scope of Work and/or meet the specifications outlined in this RFP, in a manner that meets the City’s objectives. Failure to examine the documents and inform itself shall be at the Proposers’ own risk. A Proposer shall have no claim against the City based upon ignorance of or misunderstanding of the RFP documents. Once the award has been made, failure of a Proposer to have read all of the conditions, instructions and the Agreement shall not be cause to alter any term of the Agreement nor shall such failure provide valid grounds for a Proposer to withdraw its Proposal or to seek additional compensation.

SECTION 2 – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

ADDENDA
Any changes made by the City to the requirements in this RFP will be made by written addenda. Any written addenda issued to this RFP shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of any resulting Agreement. The City will not be bound by any modifications to or deviations from the requirements outlined in this RFP as the result of oral instructions. The City reserves the right to revise or withdraw this RFP at any time and for any reason.

CLARIFICATIONS
Should a Proposer require clarifications of this RFP, the Proposer shall notify the contact person identified in this RFP in writing. Should the City, in its sole discretion, determine that the point in question is not clearly and fully set forth, the City will issue a written addendum clarifying the matter. The aforesaid addendum shall be posted on the PlanetBids.com web page.

All questions, clarifications, or comments must be submitted to or no later than 3:00 pm, Tuesday, November 28th, 2023. No questions will be answered individually by the City or Transportation Departments.

Requests for clarification, questions, and comments must be posted on the PlanetBids.com Q & A section.

The City is not responsible for failure to respond to a request that has not been submitted in accordance with this section.

Responses by the City to the clarifications, comments, and questions will be communicated via PlanetBids.com. Every attempt will be made to respond to all Proposers in accordance with the procurement schedule for this RFP. Inquiries received after the deadline will not be accepted and will be returned to the sender without a response.

Requests for clarifications and questions should be formatted in the following manner:

1. Section

Page 284 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
10 2. Paragraph number

3. Page number

4. Text of passage being questioned

5. Question

DISCREPANCIES AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS
Proposing Companies must satisfy themselves by personal examination of any worksite, drawings, Scopes of Work, and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions, requirements, and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No Proposing Company shall at any time, after submission of the Proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the satisfactory completion of the job. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in any plans, specifications, or other documents provided, shall be called to the attention of the Buyer, and clarified before the submission of Proposals.

WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS
Proposers may withdraw their Proposals in writing, provided that such requests are received by the City before the scheduled deadline for Proposal submission or within six months following the scheduled deadline for Proposal submission when no contract has been awarded.

REFERENCES
All reference information requested in this RFP and specified in the form included in this RFP must be submitted with the Proposal. Refer to Exhibit “B”.

At the discretion of the Evaluation Committee, the City may elect to perform site visits at the Proposer’s customer locations. These optional site visits will be in addition to any presentations and/or technical demonstrations. Some or all RFP Evaluation Committee members would travel, at City expense, to sites at which finalist Proposers are performing like services. The purpose of such visits shall be to provide the evaluation team with an increased understanding of the process and assess the Proposer’s implementation and performance.

PROPOSAL SIGNATURES
If an individual makes the Proposal, it shall be signed, and the full name and address of the Proposer shall be given.

If a partnership makes the Proposal, it shall be signed with the partnership name, by a member of the partnership who shall sign by name and the name and address of each partner shall be given.

If a corporation prepares the Proposal, the name of the corporation shall be provided and signed by two (2) duly authorized Officers and, if available, stamped with the corporate seal, and the names and titles of all officers of the corporation shall be given. If a corporation provides a certified letter stating that one (1) duly authorized officer signature is binding for the corporation, this will suffice to omit the second signature requirement in the Proposal. A certified letter is to be included in the Proposal accompanied by the Letter of Transmittal.

PRE-CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES

Page 285 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
11 The City will be under no obligation for payment of pre-contractual expenses. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by Proposer in:
· Preparing the Proposal in response to this request
· Submitting that Proposal to the City
· Negotiating with the City any matter related to this Proposal, and/or · Any other expenses incurred by the Proposer before the date of the award

CITY OF MONTEBELLO RIGHTS
In its discretion, the City reserves the right to:

1. Reject any and/or all Proposals for no reason or any reason including but not limited to the following:
a. The Proposal is incomplete, non-responsive, obscure, irregular, or lacking necessary detail and specificity.
b. The Proposer, in the sole judgment of the City, lacks the qualifications, experience, and/or responsibility necessary to provide the services.
c. The Proposer failed or neglected to complete and submit any information within the time specified by the City, and as may be otherwise required herein.

2. Reject any Proposal that, in the opinion of the City, is so unbalanced in comparison to other Proposals received and/or to the City’s internal estimates that it does not accurately reflect the cost to perform.

3. Accept all or any part of a Proposal.

4. Cancel the entire RFP.

5. Issue subsequent RFPs.

6. Waive any errors or informalities in any Proposal, to the extent permitted by law.

LICENSING, PERMITS, AND TAXES
The Proposer shall be appropriately licensed in accordance with the laws of the State of California for the work to be performed. The cost for any required licenses and/or permits shall be the responsibility of the successful Proposer. The successful Proposer is liable for all taxes due as a result of the contract.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The Proposer’s products, services, and facilities shall be in full compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations, standards, and ordinances, regardless of whether or not they are referred to in the RFP.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND PUBLIC RECORD
All Proposers are hereby put on notice that each Proposal received shall become the exclusive property of the City. Notwithstanding authorized exemptions and privileges, each Proposal shall be subject to disclosure according to the California Public Records Act and/or the Federal Freedom of Information Act.

The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure if required to do by law.

JOINT OFFERS

Page 286 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
12 Where two or more Proposers desire to submit in response to this RFP, they shall do so on a prime-sub consultant basis rather than as a joint venture. The City of Montebello intends to contract with a single firm and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture. Any Proposal submitted on behalf of any form of a joint venture or partnership between two (2) existing Proposers may be considered collusive and may be rejected as non-responsive.

COMPANY PERSONNEL
It shall be the burden of the successful Proposer to ensure all personnel possesses qualifications and/or experience. All personnel required in performing the services herein shall be secured at the expense of the successful Proposer. Personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City. Successful Proposer’s personnel shall conduct themselves in a professional manner to all City employees at all times. Rude or discourteous behavior by the successful Proposer will not be tolerated and the offense can be justification for termination of the contract. All sub-Consultants of successful Proposer shall abide by all the requirements outlined in this section.

SINGLE PROPOSAL RESPONSE
If only one Proposal is received in response to this RFP, a detailed cost/price Proposal may be requested of the Proposer. A cost or cost and price analysis and evaluation and/or audit of the cost may be performed to determine if the price is fair and reasonable. If the City determines a cost analysis is required, the Proposer must be prepared to provide, upon request, cost summaries of estimated costs (i.e., labor, equipment, supplies, overhead costs, etc.) and documentation supporting all cost elements.

PROTEST PROCEDURES
All protests must be filed in accordance with the following:

1. The protest must be in writing and identify the solicitation (RFP) number.

2. The protest must be submitted by some return receipt method or guarantee of delivery that ensures that the protest was received promptly. The City is not responsible for lost or delayed deliverables.

3. The party’s standing to protest must be identified.

4. Identification of the specific provision, law, regulation, specification, procedure, or policy violated.

5. A statement of the relief requested.

Protests related to the content of the RFP shall be received no later than ten (10) days before the Proposal due date; or within five (5) days after proposal opening. If the Protest does not comply with the preceding requirements, it may not be evaluated and may be returned to the Protestor.

All protests shall be submitted to the contact person identified in this solicitation. If the solicitation is funded with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) monies, a protest may be filed with the FTA. However, the FTA only accepts protests alleging that a grantee failed to have written protest procedures or did not comply with those procedures or protests that involve a conflict of interest or fraud.

INCORPORATION OF PROPOSAL INTO AGREEMENT

Page 287 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
13 This RFP and the Proposer’s response, including all promises, warranties, commitments, and representations made in the successful Proposal, shall be binding, and incorporated by reference in the City’s contract with the successful Proposer.

TIME OF COMPLETION
The contract time shall commence from the date on the Notice to Proceed (NTP) as authorized in writing by the City. The services shall be completed within the period specified in the Request for Proposal. In case the services under the terms of these provisions and related purchase contract shall be necessarily delayed because of a strike, injunctions, government controls, or by reasons of any cause or circumstances beyond the control of the awarded consultant (or “consultant”), the time of completion shall be extended by a number of days to be determined in each instance by mutual agreement between consultant and MBL.

PAYMENT
A separate invoice, referencing the respective purchase order number, shall be issued in duplicate for each invoice shown in the payment schedule, and addressed to the City of Montebello, Attn: Accounts Payable, 1600 West Beverly Boulevard, Montebello, California, 90640.

Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after acceptance and approval of the invoice.

Payment Schedule: Monthly
Provide (1) One invoice monthly.

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: ORAL CHANGES / CONTRACT TERMINATION Oral Changes: Oral changes and oral change orders are not permitted. All proposed changes must be submitted in writing to, and approved by, MBL prior to becoming a Contract modification.

Contract Termination: MBL may terminate any resulting Contract for convenience at any time by giving the consultant written notice thereof. Upon termination, MBL shall pay the consultant his allowable cost incurred to the date of termination, and those costs deemed reasonably necessary by MBL to affect such termination, determined in accordance with Part 1-8.705-1 of the Federal Procurement Regulations (41CFR 1-8) or other applicable portion(s) of said Regulations. In addition, MBL shall pay the consultant a percentage of the project, which relates to Contract work accomplished to date of termination. The effective date of termination shall be the date of Notice of Termination.

In the event the consultant breaches the terms or violates the conditions of the contract, and does not within ten days, thereafter, cure such breach of violation, MBL may immediately terminate the Contract for default. consultant shall be liable for any and all costs incurred by MBL as a result of such default.

Page 288 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
14 SCOPE OF CONTRACT
Consultant shall provide all services necessary as per the Scope of Work described in this Request for Proposal.

PERFORMANCE OF WORK
It is the intent of these specifications to provide only services of the highest quality. The cost to be quoted and submitted shall include all items of service and any other costs necessary to fully complete the work according to the provisions. It is the aim of these specifications that the consultant provides complete services of the type prescribed. Any items omitted from such specifications that are necessary for the completion of such services shall be considered a portion of such services, although not directly specified or called for in these specifications. No advantage shall be taken by the consultant in the omission of any detail which goes to make the services complete, even though such detail is not mentioned in these specifications.

AWARD OF CONTRACT
The contract resulting from this RFP will be awarded to the responsive and responsible Proposer whose proposal, conforming to the requirements of the RFP, is determined to be the most advantageous (“Best Value” as described in the Federal Transit Administration Circular 4220.1F) to the City, based on the Evaluation Criteria. No agreement shall exist until the City Council, or the City Manager has awarded the Agreement, and it has been mutually executed. The City reserves the right to:
(a) Accept all or any part of a proposal;
(b) Reject any or all proposals for any reason;
(c) Waive any informality or minor errors to the extent permitted by law; (d) Award the Agreement as the interest of the City may require; (e) Cancel the entire RFP; or
(f) Issue subsequent RFP’s.

An Evaluation Committee comprised of MBL staff in accordance with the Proposal Evaluation Criteria set forth in the Evaluation Criteria section of this RFP, will evaluate all the proposals. During the evaluation period, the City may interview some or all the proposing firms. Proposers should be aware; however, that award may be made without interviews or further discussions.

The City may negotiate contract terms with the selected Proposer prior to award, and expressly reserves the right to negotiate with several Proposers simultaneously and, thereafter, to award a contract to the Proposer offering the most favorable terms to the City. However, negotiations may or may not be conducted with Proposers; therefore, the proposal submitted should contain the most favorable terms and conditions, since the selection and award may be made without discussion with any Proposer.

No agreement shall exist until the City Council or City Manager has awarded the Agreement and it has been mutually executed. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Proposals for any reason, to waive any informality or minor errors as determined by the City in any Proposal and to award the Agreement as the best interests of the City may require. The award, if any, may be made by the City within ninety (90) calendar days after the opening of the Proposals.

Point of Contact

Page 289 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
15 This RFP is issued by the City, and the Management Analyst will be the sole point of contact (“Point of Contact”) during the RFP submission and procurement process. Communications initiated by respondents to this RFP with members of the City Council, or officers, personnel or employees of the City, other than as coordinated by the Point of Contact, may be grounds for disqualification. Any inquiries or requests during this submission or procurement process shall be submitted in writing to the following Point of Contact:

City of Montebello Transportation Department
Attention: Matt Lightner,
Management Analyst
400 South Taylor Ave.

Montebello, CA 90640
(323) 558-1625 ext. 344
Email: [email protected]
If the Point of Contact determines a response to any such inquiry is warranted, said response will be issued to all prospective Proposers via PlanetBids.com.

EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
MBL uses a selection process in which proposals contain both price and qualitative components, and the award is based upon a combination of price and qualitative considerations. Qualitative considerations may include experience and qualifications, technical approach, quality of proposed personnel, and/or management plan. The award selection is based upon consideration of a combination of technical and price factors to determine the offer deemed most advantageous to MBL.

An Evaluation Committee will be appointed to review all proposals. The committee will be comprised of MBL staff. Committee members will initially evaluate each proposal using the pass or fail criteria identified herein. Proposers who pass this first stage of testing will progress to the next step in the evaluation.

MBL will evaluate the offers based on the following criteria: Pass/Fail Criteria • Proposer has demonstrated the ability to meet the insurance requirements described in the Agreement. Proof of ability, for example a sample certificate with another agency, or a statement that the proposer can meet the insurance requirements in the RFP should be attached to proposal.
• Proposer has demonstrated evidence of good standing. If the Proposer is a corporation or limited liability company, provide evidence that it is in good standing in the state of its incorporation/organization and qualified to do business in California. If the Proposer is a partnership or joint venture, provide such evidence for all partners or members. The evidence provided must be in the form of (i) an official certificate of good standing issued by the state of incorporation/organization and (ii) qualification to do business issued by the California Secretary of State. If the Proposer is operating under a fictitious name or trade name, provide evidence that the Proposer has filed for and/or registered the fictitious name with the county where the Proposer’s business is located.

Page 290 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
16 On the completion of the initial Pass/Fail review, the committee will evaluate proposals using the twostep process. Qualitative considerations will be reviewed and scored first without attention to the price.

The committee will then present the cost and price proposals and evaluate and score them accordingly.

During the qualitative evaluation, the committee, at its sole discretion may contact any or all the Proposers with specific questions or requests for clarification. After both the qualitative and cost/price proposals have been evaluated and scored, the committee will arrive at a “comprehensive proposal score” for each proposal. A list of top-ranked proposals within a competitive range will be developed based upon the total comprehensive scores provided by committee members. At this time, the committee may decide that the evaluation process is complete and submit a final recommendation to the Director of Transportation.

The committee may ask the Proposers to consider the dialog of negotiations and revise their proposals. A deadline will be set for the submission of the revised proposals. If a Proposer is unable to meet the deadline or chooses not to revise its proposal, its existing proposal will be rescored along with revised proposals in the same manner as the original proposals.

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal offers the best value to the City. Proposals that meet the pass/ fail criteria now will be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria:

Qualitative Considerations
The Proposer’s Qualitative Proposal will be evaluated on the basis of the following factors, each having the weighted value set forth below:
1 Project Management Plan
The proposal shall contain a detailed explanation of the project and not a reiteration of the RFP itself. The information offered should be a compendium of the Proposer’s knowledge of the standards outlined in the Scope of Work. 20 points
2 Proposed Project Team
Qualifications and experience of management and staff and other personnel; comprehensiveness of plan and team’s familiarity with the provision of BSIP Consulting Services.
10 points
3 Qualifications and Experience
Demonstrate experience completing consulting services for BSIP of the same or similar magnitude. Presentation of a catalog of BSIP experience and expertise most advantageous to the City.
10 points
4 Technical Approach
Contractor will submit with their proposal a written plan of action. Plan of action shall include contact persons and schedule adherence, as well as invoicing process.

Understanding of the RFP requirements and illustrating the ability to meet performance objectives, compliance with all technical and administrative requirements, financial viability, accounting, and reporting. 35 points

Page 291 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
17 TOTAL 75 points
Price Considerations
The Price proposals will be evaluated as follows:
5 Price
The Proposer’s Price proposal will be compared to the proposal with the Best Value to the City. The best value responsive price will receive the total weighted value for this criterion.
25 points
TOTAL 25 points
SECTION 3 – QUALIFICATIONS

DESIRED QUALIFICATION
The consultant shall possess the capability and expertise required to complete the following tasks:

A. Conduct a resourceful in-depth examination of MBL’s existing operation.

B. Provide specialized knowledge of the transit environment including infrastructure, operational, and regulatory expertise to make recommendations in service improvements.

C. Complete quantitative and qualitative research and analysis to review transit design, statistical trends, and historical information.

D. Utilize subject matter experts and deep industry knowledge to improve current operations and the effectiveness of MBL’s transportation services.

E. Provide accurate and professional cost estimates and expense projections for a variety of goods and services associated with a Bus Stop Improvement Project.

F. Demonstrate strong communication and coordination skills with MBL staff and outside parties in a constructive solution-focused style.

To be considered responsive to the RFP, firms must demonstrate that they meet the following minimum qualifications by providing a thorough response and verifiable evidence of compliance. Non-compliance with these requirements may disqualify your proposal from further consideration.

A. List and describe a minimum of five (5) projects or experiences, similar in nature to the Project contemplated in this RFP, which the Proposer is currently performing or has performed within the last thirty-six (36) months.

B. The firm has not defaulted on a contract within the past five (5) years or declared bankruptcy or been placed in receivership or been denied credit within the past three (3) years.

C. The firm has not been assessed any penalties for non-compliance with any federal, state, local, city, or county labor laws and/or regulations within the past five (5) years.

D. The firm is currently not under investigation for any charge or claim for noncompliance with any federal, state, local, city, or county labor laws and/or regulations including, without limitation prevailing wage laws and apprenticeship laws.

E. Licensed to do business in the State of California. The firm can provide applicable Certifications (if required).

F. The firm possesses a professional staff with five (5) years of knowledge and experience to complete the BISP project.

G. Financial capacity.

Page 292 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
18 SECTION 4 – SCOPE OF WORK
This project will provide an in-depth analysis of the City of Montebello’s bus shelters and evaluate overall structural needs to provide services to the various customers that MBL serves. The project will act as a guide to improve bus shelters and also facilitate a future construction RFP which will follow the guidelines the Consultant provides in their final report.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this solicitation is to assist the Transportation Department in implementing the Montebello Bus Lines Bus Stop Improvement Project. The project will include an assessment of current conditions, estimates for conditions improvements, and a future construction RFP development phase.

OBJECTIVES
To solicit bids for a comprehensive Bus Stop Improvement Project survey that will result in a initial construction RFP based on the recommendations of this survey.

General Deliverables

1. Bus stop Inventory and Assessment Report.

2. Cost Assessments outlined in Tasks.

3. Timeline or schedule to complete each Task.

WORK PLAN
Task 1: Bus Shelter Inventory
The consultant will inventory approximately 900 bus stops. Consultant will provide data points based on the bullet points listed below:
- Review the Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) Final Report from April 2022 to determine current MBL lines and possible future changes.
- Perform on-site field analysis and take digital photos of each bus stop to determine the condition of the site.
- Inventory existing conditions to determine accessibility in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws.

Page 293 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
19 - Inventory existing amenities including shelters, benches, trash receptacles, near-side and far-side locations, and any other recommend improvements or additions to existing amenities that are standard practice.
- Describe any potential risk and liabilities under federal, state, and local accessibility law (ADA). - Provide Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping of each stop location. o Provide access to ESRI ArcGIS Account.
- Make recommendations to improve accessibility as needed. - Create numbering plan for the creation of stop identification numbers.

Deliverables:
- Provide overall report of bus stops with a conditions and inventory assessment. - Provide a breakdown of stops with stop descriptions including GIS location mapping, street names, bus route numbers, etc.
- Provide list of ADA compliant, ADA non-compliant, and accessibility recommendations.

Task 2: Design Recommendations.

The consultant will compile and submit design improvement recommendations for bus stops that will standardize all bust stops.
- Accessibility – pedestrian flow, cyclist flow, and driver flow - New Logo Integration – provide bus blade logo design similar to the new bus graphics rebrand. - Visibility – minimize blind spots that could impact pedestrians, cyclists, or other drivers. - Location improvement– provide design plans to allow for ADA compliance if needed and more pedestrian and cyclist waiting areas for customers. Plans would incorporate all elements of the bus stop such as: bus pad, curb and gutter, intersection, zoning area, size, traffic flow, and sidewalk space.
- Pick-up and Drop-off location adjustments if needed.
- Traffic flow improvements around bus stop locations.
- Traffic volume studies.
- Traffic control device identification (traffic lights, signs, etc.) - Pedestrian volume and usage study for passenger and non-passengers. - Cyclist volume and usage study for passenger and non-passengers. - Survey surrounding features to determine the best amenities to install. Including buildings, businesses, crosswalks, driveways, intersections, streets, and freeways.

Page 294 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
20 - Review lighting of the area both natural and streetlight. - Alternative design options for locations as needed.
- Determine sidewalk repair needs if applicable.
- Conduct a site conditions assessment.
- Determine ADA construction needs if applicable.
- Provide standardized design recommendations for shelters, benches, stop, etc.

Deliverables
- Provide a comprehensive overview of standard designs for the region. - Provide analysis of recommendations to meet regional standards. - Provide Design recommendations considering each element listed above and costs associated with possible improvements.

Task 3: Amenity Recommendations.

The consultant will provide amenity recommendations based on the survey from Task 1 and the design recommendations from Task 2 for each bus stop site. Amenities may include but are not limited to:
- Digital signage.
- Bus shelter solar lights.
- Bus stops sign solar lights.
- ADA compliance.
- Site improvements that may include shelters, benches, trash receptacles, beacon lights etc. - Bus pad installations.
- Provide cost estimates for improvements.
- Provide standardized recommendations for shelters, benches, stop, etc. - A Title VI analysis demonstrating the methodology used for the equitable distribution of amenities must be completed as a part of the amenity recommendation.

Deliverables
- Provide a comprehensive overview of amenities for the region. - Provide analysis of recommendations to meet regional standards. - Provide amenity recommendations considering each element listed above and costs associated with possible improvements.

Task 4: Bus Stop Assessment for Bus Stop Improvement Project.

Page 295 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
21 The consultant will assess bus stops within the City’s jurisdiction. There are approximately 200 bus stops within the City of Montebello. This task will be a more in-depth assessment and design needs of bus stops within the city limits.
- Prepare a checklist of design factors for each bus stop including alternative design options and any potential risk or liabilities under federal, state, or local accessibility law (ADA). - Make recommendations for accessibility improvements if any. - Make general improvement recommendations that increase circulation and improve overall design with elements from Task 2 and Task 3.
- Provide city jurisdiction cost estimates and outside city jurisdiction cost estimates for recommended improvements.

Deliverables
- Provide an estimate of removal costs.
- Provide a comprehensive overview of improvements with cost estimates needed for each bus stop within the city’s jurisdiction (ADA, repair needs, etc.). - Provide a comprehensive overview of improvements with cost estimates needed for each bus stop outside of the city’s jurisdiction (ADA, repair needs, etc.). - Provide line-by-line cost estimates for bus stop location improvements. - Provide a general plan of implementation for the RFP process.

Task 5: Plan and Design of Development Phase/RFP Creation:

The consultant will combine all elements in the previous tasks to produce an RFP for the Development Phase of the project.
- Coordinate elements of recommendations with key MBL staff to confirm design and goals of the project.
- Consultant will provide selected bus stops within the City’s jurisdiction that must be upgraded with new installations to meet ADA standards. New installations may include street furniture, digital signage, or other amenity upgrade recommendations. - Consultant will provide evaluation assistance to choose recommended designs. - Prepare project design/construction schedule.
- Provide utility planning and coordinate with utility providers. - Provide cost estimates for each project element.

Deliverables
- Provide fully articulated construction RFP which includes all deliverables from previous tasks and MBL staff recommendations.

Page 296 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
22 - Provide cost estimates for future consultation needs based on the three requested cost estimates in Task 4.
- Provide estimated project schedule for construction.

SECTION 5 – FORM OF CONTRACT (SAMPLE)

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (BSIP) CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on …………………….., 2023, by the CITY OF MONTEBELLO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “CITY”) and …………………………….. (Hereinafter referred to as “CONSULTANT”). CITY and CONSULTANT are sometimes referred to herein individual as a “Party,” and jointly as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain a qualified professional consultant to assist CITY in providing an in-dept Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services to improve the agency’s transit system.; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents the degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and is qualified to perform such services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees; and WHEREAS, no official or employee of CITY has a financial interest, within the provisions of Sections 1090 – 1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT responded to CITY’s Request for Proposals dated October 26, 2023 (RFP No. [24-7]), as such is set forth fully in Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated fully herein by this reference (hereinafter “Consultant Proposal”).

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the Parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

Page 297 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
23 A. The above-referenced Recitals constitute a material part hereof and shall hereby be incorporated by reference. Moreover, this Agreement consists of the following documents, in order of precedence, all of which are incorporated herein and made part of this Agreement, as though fully set forth herein:
a. This Agreement.
b. RFP No. 24-7, attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
c. CONSULTANT’S Proposal to RFP No. 24-7 dated ……………., 2023, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. d. CONSULTANT’S “Best and Final Offer” to RFP No. 24-7 dated ……………., 2023, attached hereto as Exhibit “C”.
e. All other documents, including but not limited to all applicable bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, schedules, forms, certifications, and affidavits.

B. These documents shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Contract Documents.” In the event of a conflict among the Contract Documents, the order of precedence.

SECTION 2. SERVICES / COMPENSATION.

A. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY those services that are set forth fully in the Scope of Services, as such is set forth fully in Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated fully herein by this reference (hereinafter “Professional Services”).

B. CONSULTANT shall complete the Scope of Services within the time set forth in the Schedule of Performance, as such is set forth in Exhibit “B” hereto and incorporated fully herein by this reference.

B. CONSULTANT shall be compensated a sum not-to-exceed $………………………………………(the “Maximum Compensation”) for performance of the Professional Services as set forth in the Schedule of Compensation attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated fully herein by this reference (“Compensation”). CONSULTANT shall provide an itemized billing statement to CITY each month for Professional Services performed. CONSULTANT shall not incur fees or costs which exceed the Maximum Compensation without the prior written consent of CITY.

C. CITY will be invoiced at the end of the first billing period following commencement of work and at the end of each billing period thereafter. Payment in full of an invoice must be received by CONSULTANT within thirty (30) days of the date of such invoice.

D. Work performed shall be deemed approved and accepted by CITY as and when invoiced unless CITY objects within fifteen (15) days of invoice date by written notice specifically stating the details in which CITY believes such work is incomplete or defective, and the invoice amount(s) in dispute. CITY shall pay undisputed amounts as provided for in the preceding paragraph.

E. Failure of CITY to submit full payment of an invoice within thirty (30) days of the date thereof subjects this agreement and the work herein contemplated to suspension or termination at CONSULTANT's discretion.

SECTION 3. TERM.

Page 298 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
24 This Agreement shall commence on ………………, 2023 and shall terminate upon completion of the Scope of Services set forth herein, unless terminated sooner as provided in Section 8 herein.

The Parties agree that Sections 4(B), 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, and 19 shall survive for three (3) years following the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 4. PERFORMANCE.

A. CONSULTANT shall at all times, faithfully, competently, and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.

B. CONSULTANT shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by companies engaged in providing similar services, as are required of CONSULTANT hereunder, in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

C. CONSULTANT shall be knowledgeable of and subject to all CITY ordinances, rules and regulations, standard operating procedures, and the supervisory chain of command.

D. CONSULTANT shall have the right to retain, subject to CITY's written approval, additional individuals, consultants or subcontractors to assist in the completion of services as herein defined.

Compensation for additional individuals, consultants or subcontractors shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of CONSULTANT.

E. CONSULTANT shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement for a period of three (3) years, unless otherwise provided for in Exhibit “A.” Upon CITY providing twenty-four (24) hours advanced prior notice, CONSULTANT shall make all records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by CONSULTANT in connection with this Agreement available during CONSULTANT’s regular working hours to CITY for review and audit by CITY.

F. All reports, documents or other written material developed by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by CITY. Such material shall not be the subject of a copyright application by CONSULTANT. Any alteration or reuse by CITY of any such materials on any project other than the Project shall be at CITY’s sole risk, unless CITY compensates CONSULTANT for such reuse.

SECTION 5. WORK PRODUCT.

A. CONSULTANT hereby agrees that all work produced pursuant to this Agreement, and provided to CITY during and upon completion of this Agreement, shall be the property of CITY, and ownership of said work product shall be retained by CITY. CONSULTANT may take and retain copies of such written products as desired.

B. All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by CONSULTANT or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by CONSULTANT without prior written consent by CITY. CITY shall grant such consent if disclosure is legally required. All such written products shall be returned to CITY upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees that the covenants contained in this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Page 299 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
25 C. Documents are provided in CONSULTANT’s standard software formats. CITY recognizes that electronic or magnetic data and its transmission can be easily damaged, may not be compatible with CITY’s software formats and systems, may develop inaccuracies during conversion or use, and may contain viruses or other destructive programs, and that software and hardware operating systems may become obsolete. As a condition of delivery of electronic or magnetic data, CITY agrees to defend indemnify and hold CONSULTANT, its sub-contractors, agents and employees harmless from and against all claims, loss, damages, expense and liability arising from or connected with its use, reuse, misuse, modification or misinterpretation. In no event shall CONSULTANT be liable for any loss of use, profit or any other damage.

SECTION 6. EXTRA SERVICES.

No extra services over and above the Compensation shall be rendered by CONSULTANT under this Agreement unless such extra services first shall have been duly authorized in writing by CITY’s City Manager (“City Manager”).

SECTION 7. CITY SUPERVISION.

The Transportation Director shall have the right of general supervision of all work performed by CONSULTANT and shall be CITY’s agent with respect to obtaining CONSULTANT’s compliance hereunder.

No payment for services rendered under this Agreement shall be made without the prior approval of the City Manager.

SECTION 8. TERMINATION.

In the event that either Party hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party written notice of the default, the nature of the default, and of the steps necessary to cure the default.

A. Termination for Cause. In the event that any of the provisions of the Agreement are violated by either party, the non-defaulting Party may terminate the Agreement by serving written notice upon the other Party, listing the violation(s) and its intent to terminate such Agreement unless within ten (10) days after the serving of such notice, such violation shall cease or be rectified, the contract shall upon the expiration of an additional thirty (30) days cease and terminate. Violations by CONSULTANT which cannot be corrected within ten (10) days, said contract shall at the option of CITY cease and terminate upon the giving of like notice. In the event of any such termination for default by CONSULTANT, CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise for the account and at the expense of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT and his sureties shall be liable to CITY for any excess cost occasioned in the event of any such termination. This change shall not be construed to prevent the termination, for other causes authorized by law or other provisions of this contract. In the event of a termination for cause, CONSULTANT shall only be entitled to the Compensation for those Professional Services satisfactory performed on or before the effective date of termination.

B. Termination for Convenience. CITY shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, to terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, after giving written notice to CONSULTANT at least five (5) business days before the termination is to be effective. Upon the termination of this Agreement as provided herein, CITY shall provide to CONSULTANT the part of Compensation which would otherwise be payable to CONSULTANT for services CONSULTANT had

Page 300 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
26 completed as of the date of termination, less the amount of all previous payment with respect to the Compensation. Further, upon such a termination for convenience by CITY, the Parties agree that CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for any “non-refundable” costs that CONSULTANT has incurred for its services under this Agreement, provided that: (1) such “non- refundable” costs were incurred by CONSULTANT prior to the date of termination; (2) that CONSULTANT provides CITY with adequate proof that CONSULTANT incurred the costs, and is unable to be seek a refund for such costs; and (3) such costs were within the scope of work or services to be performed under this Agreement. Such “non-refundable” costs may include, but are not limited to, travel reservations incurred by CONSULTANT for its performance of services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of any notice of termination.

SECTION 9. EMPLOYMENT OF CITY EMPLOYEES.

No regular employee of CITY shall be employed by CONSULTANT during the Term of this Agreement.

SECTION 10. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.

No official or employee of CITY shall be personally liable to CONSULTANT in the event of any default or breach by CITY, or for any amount which may become due to CONSULTANT.

SECTION 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

A. CONSULTANT is and shall, at all times, remain as to CITY a wholly independent contractor.

Neither CITY nor any of its elected officials, officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that he is in any manner an elected official, officer, employee or agent of CITY. No employee benefits shall be available to CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this Agreement, CITY shall not pay salary, wages, or other compensation to CONSULTANT for performance hereunder for CITY. CITY shall not be liable for compensation to CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT’s employees or CONSULTANT’s subcontractors for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

B. The parties further acknowledge and agree that nothing in this Agreement shall create or be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, employment relationship or any other relationship except as set forth in this Agreement.

C. CITY shall not deduct from the Compensation paid to CONSULTANT any sums required for Social Security, withholding taxes, FICA, state disability insurance or any other federal, state or local tax or charge which may or may not be in effect or hereinafter enacted or required as a charge or withholding on the compensation paid to CONSULTANT. CITY shall have no responsibility to provide CONSULTANT, its employees or subcontractors with workers’ compensation insurance or any other insurance.

SECTION 12. PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNITY.

A. In the event that CONSULTANT or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of CONSULTANT providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an

Page 301 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
27 employee of CITY, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of CONSULTANT or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of CITY.

B. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, CONSULTANT and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by CITY, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of CITY and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by CITY for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

SECTION 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES.

CONSULTANT shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local governments including, but not limited to the Montebello Municipal Code. CITY, and its appointed or elected officers, employees, or agents, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this section.

SECTION 14. INDEMNIFICATION.

CONSULTANT agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless, CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, defense costs, civil, penalties, expenses, causes of action, and judgments at law or in equity, or liability of any kind or nature which CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injuries or deaths of persons, or damage to property arising out of CONSULTANT’S negligent or wrongful act, or omission under the terms of this Agreement, except only liability arising out of the sole negligence of CITY.

SECTION 15. INSURANCE COVERAGE.

During the Term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect all of the following minimum scope of insurance against claims for death or injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with CONSULTANT’s performance of this Agreement. Such insurance shall be of the types and in the amounts as set forth below:

Commercial General Liability (CGL): Broad-form, Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis for bodily injury and property damage, including premiseoperations, products-completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury, and advertising injury, with limits no less than Two Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($2,000,000), combined single limits, per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, the limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Business Automobile Liability Insurance: For owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if CONSULTANT has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limit no less than One Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,000,000.00) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Page 302 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
28 Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the laws of the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,000,000.00) per accident for bodily injury or disease. CONSULTANT agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers’ compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers’ compensation insurance policy against CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONSULTANT for CITY and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise under their workers’ compensation insurance policies.

By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT further certifies as follows:

I am aware of, and will comply with, Section 3700 of the Labor Code, requiring every employer to be insured against liability of Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance before commencing any of the work contemplated herein.

Professional Errors and Omissions (E&O) Liability insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’s profession, with limit no less than Two Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence or claim, Two Million Dollars and Zero Cents ($2,000,000.00) aggregate. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retroactivity date shall be prior to the start of work set forth herein, CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain said E&O liability insurance during the Term of this Agreement and for five (5) years after completion of work hereunder. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the work.

If CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to CITY.

CONTACTOR shall require each of its subcontractors, if any, to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement.

The policy or policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of California, with a current rating of at least A: VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, and approved by CITY.

Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after providing CITY thirty (30) days’ (or ten [10] calendar days’ for non-payment) prior written notice.

CONSULTANT agrees that if it does not keep the aforesaid insurance in full force and effect CITY may either: (i) immediately terminate this Agreement for Cause; or (ii) take out the necessary insurance and pay, at CONSULTANT’S expense, the premium thereon.

At all times during the Term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall maintain on file with CITY’s Risk Manager a certificate or certificates of insurance showing that the aforesaid policies are in effect in the required amounts and naming CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as an additional insured. CONSULTANT shall, prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, file with CITY’s Risk

Page 303 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
29 Manager such certificate(s).

CONSULTANT shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the Term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

The general liability and automobile policies of insurance required by this Agreement shall contain an endorsement naming CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds. All of the policies required under this Agreement shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies cannot be canceled or reduced except on thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to CITY. CONSULTANT agrees to require its insurer to modify the certificates of insurance to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word “endeavor” with regard to any notice provisions.

Except for professional liability and workers’ compensation policies, the policies herein are primary and non-contributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by CITY, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not prohibit CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT’s employees, agents or subcontractors, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss.

CONSULTANT hereby waives all rights of subrogation against CITY. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not CITY has received a waiver if subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Coverage not affected. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies contemplated herein, shall not affect coverage provided to CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

Coverage applies separately. CONSULTANT’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. At the option of CITY, CONSULTANT shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to CITY, or CONSULTANT shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.

Procurement of insurance by CONSULTANT shall not be construed as a limitation of CONSULTANT's liability or as fall performance of CONSULTANT’s duties to indemnify, hold harmless and defend under Section 9 of this Agreement.

CITY, its officers and employees shall not be responsible for any claims in law or in equity occasioned by failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this section.

SECTION 16. SUBCONTRACT, ASSIGNMENT OR DELEGATION.

CONSULTANT shall not subcontract, delegate or assign its duties or rights hereunder, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of CITY. Any proposed subcontract, delegation, or assignment shall provide a description of the services to be covered, identification of the proposed subPage 304 of 840 RFP No. 24-7
30 contractor, delegee, or assignee, and an explanation of why and how the same was selected, including the degree of competition involved.

Any subcontract, delegation or assignment shall be made in the name of CONSULTANT and shall not bind or purport to bind CITY and shall not release CONSULTANT from any obligations under this Agreement including, but not limited to, the duty to properly supervise and coordinate the work of employees, assignees, delegees or sub-contractors. No such subcontract, delegation or assignment shall result in any increase in the amount of total compensation payable to CONSULTANT under the Agreement.

SECTION 17. NO WAIVER.

Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition or covenant hereof.

SECTION 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION; GOVERNING LAW.

Disputes regarding the interpretation or application of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall, to the extent reasonably feasible, be resolved through good faith negotiations between the Parties. If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce this Agreement or because of alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees, costs and necessary disbursements incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to such other relief as may be sought and awarded. The venue for any litigation shall be County of Los Angeles, California. The Parties agree that the covenants contained in this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 19. ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS.

If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

SECTION 20. WARRANTIES.

Each of the parties represents and warrants to one another as follows:

A. It has received independent legal advice from its attorneys with respect to the advisability of entering into and executing this Agreement;
B. In executing this Agreement, it has carefully read this Agreement, knows the contents thereof, and has relied solely on the statements expressly set forth herein and has placed no reliance whatsoever on any statement, representation, or promise of any other party, or any other person or entity, not expressly set forth herein, nor upon the failure of any other party or any other person or entity to make any statement, representation or disclosure of any matter whatsoever; and C. It is agreed that each party has the full right and authority to enter into this Agreement, and that the person executing this Agreement on behalf of either party has the full right and authority to fully commit and bind such party to the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 21. MISCELLANEOUS.

Page 305 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
31 A. The descriptive paragraph headings of this Agreement are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not control or affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions.

B. Whenever the context hereof shall so require, the singular shall include the plural, the male gender shall include the female gender, and the neuter and vice versa.

C. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained herein.

D. The representations and warranties made by the parties to this Agreement shall survive the consummation of the transaction herein described.

E. This Agreement may be signed in any one or more counterparts all of which taken together shall be but one and the same Agreement. Any signed copy of this Agreement or of any other document or agreement referred to herein, or copy or counterpart thereof, delivered by facsimile transmission, shall for all purposes be treated as if it were delivered containing an original manual signature of the party whose signature appears in the facsimile and shall be binding upon such party in the same manner as though an originally signed copy had been delivered.

F. Each of the parties acknowledges that it has been represented by independent counsel of its own choosing, or if it has not been so represented, it has been admonished to obtain independent counsel and has freely and voluntarily waived and relinquished the right to counsel. Each party who has not obtained independent counsel acknowledges that the failure to have independent legal counsel will not excuse such party’s failure to perform under this Agreement or any agreement referred to in this Agreement.

G. To the extent of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and those set forth in any exhibits or attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

SECTION 22. NOTICE.

All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals hereunder shall be given to the following addresses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice:

CITY MANAGER
City of Montebello
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, California 90640

CONSULTANT
________________________
________________________
________________________

Page 306 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
32 ________________________
SECTION 23. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER.

In the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee, sub-contractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, mental condition or sexual orientation.

CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that sub-contractor and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition or sexual orientation.

SECTION 24. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

CONSULTANT and its officers, employees, associates and sub consultants, if any, shall comply with all California conflict of interest statutes applicable to Consultant’s Services under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code, § 81000 et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. CONSULTANT further covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder.

CONSULTANT further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, CONSULTANT shall avoid the appearance of having any interest that would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of services to CITY as a result of the performance of this Agreement, or the services that may be procured by CITY as a result of the recommendations made by CONSULTANT.

CONSULTANT's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement contains the entire understanding between CITY and CONSULTANT. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each party. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding.

CITY OF MONTEBELLO CONSULTANT
_______________________ _____________________
Arlene Salazar Name and Title
Acting City Manager

Page 307 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
33 Dated: _____________ Dated: _____________
ATTEST:
______________________
Christopher Jimenez
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
________________________
Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman
City Attorney
SECTION 6 - FORMS AND CERTIFICATIONS

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Transportation Department
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. 24-7

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (BSIP) CONSULTING SERVICES In response to the subject Request for Proposal (RFP) and in accordance with the accompanying Instructions to Proposers, the Proposer hereby commits to the City of Montebello to perform the work in accordance with the provisions in the Proposal Level Contract Documents and any addenda thereto and at the prices stated in the Revenue Price Sheet, which will be included and made a part of any subsequent Contract.

The Proposer agrees that the Proposal constitutes a firm offer that cannot be withdrawn for ninety (90) calendar days from the Proposal opening or until the Contract for the work is fully executed between the City and a third party, whichever is earlier.

If awarded a contract, the Proposer agrees to execute the Agreement and deliver it to the City of Montebello within seven (7) calendar days after receiving a Letter of Award together with the necessary certificates of insurance and any applicable performance or payment bonds. The Contractor shall proceed with the work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed.

The Proposer certifies that it has:

1. Examined and is fully familiar with all the provisions of the RFP Documents and any addenda thereto:

Page 308 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
34 2. Satisfied itself as to the requirements of the Contract, the nature and location of the work, the general and local conditions to be encountered in performance of the work, and all other matters that can in any way affect the Work and/or the cost thereof.

3. Examined the experience, skill and certification requirements in Scope of Services and that the entities performing the work can fulfill the specified requirements; and

4. Carefully reviewed the accuracy of all statements and figures shown in the Proposal and attachment hereto.

Therefore, the undersigned hereby agrees that the City of Montebello will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the Proposal.

The Proposer further certifies that:

1. The only persons, firms, corporations, joint ventures/partnerships, and/or other parties interested in the Proposal as principals are those listed as such in the Proposal Forms and that,

2. The Proposal has been prepared without collusion with any other person, firm, corporation, joint venture/partnership, and/or other party.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding and full consideration of the following addenda to the Proposal Documents:

Addenda No(s)
Dated Dated
Dated Dated
Dated Dated
Failure to acknowledge receipt of all addenda may cause the Proposal to be considered non-responsive to the solicitation. Acknowledged receipt of each addendum must be clearly established and included with the Proposal /offer.

Proposer’s Name
Business Address
Contact Person
Email Address
Phone

Page 309 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
35 Fax
Signature of Authorized Official Signature of Authorized Official Typed or Printed Name Typed or Printed Name
Title Title
Date Date

(Joint ventures/partnerships are to provide a signed copy of their agreement with their Proposal.) For Proposals requiring licenses the following information is required:

Contractor’s License No.

Expiration Date:

License Classification:

Page 310 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
36

Page 311 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
37 EXHIBIT A

INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF SUBROGATION AND CONTRIBUTION Contract/Agreement/License/Permit No. or description: RFP Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services Indemnitor(s): __________________________________________________ (List all names)
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Indemnitor hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Montebello and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith (collectively “Liabilities”), resulting from any wrongful or negligent act, failure to act, error, or omission of Indemnitor or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, material men, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to the above-referenced: RFP No. 24-7 Bus Stop Improvement Project (BSIP) Consulting Services (the “Waiver”) or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of the Waiver, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Waiver and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against the Indemnitor shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision. Indemnitor shall pay Indemnitees for any attorney’s fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees’ active negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a), or (b) the contracting public agency’s active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(b). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Waiver or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees.

City agrees to promptly inform Indemnitor in writing of any claim that City believes to be subject to this Waiver.

Indemnitor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Indemnitor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent non-active negligence by the Indemnitees.

In the event there is more than one person or entity named in the Waiver as an Indemnitor, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this instrument shall be joint and several. “Indemnitor”
Name: __________________________________________________Name: ________________________ (Print) (Print)
By: _________________________________________________By: _________________________________________ (Signature) (Signature)
Title: ______________________________________________Title: _______________________________________ Date: ________________________________________________Date: ________________________________________

Page 312 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
38 EXHIBIT B

REFERENCES
List at Least Three (3) Professional References:
1 Project City/Agency/Other:

Person of Contact:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Description of Contract (Please
include contract value, award
date, term of contract, and
description of work):

Contract Value: $
Award Date:

Term of Contract:

Description of Work:
2 Project City/Agency/Other:

Person of Contact:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Description of Contract (Please
include contract value, award
date, term of contract, and
description of work):

Contract Value: $
Award Date:

Term of Contract:

Description of Work:
3 Project City/Agency/Other:

Person of Contact:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Description of Contract (Please
include contract value, award
date, term of contract, and
description of work):

Contract Value: $
Award Date:

Term of Contract:

Description of Work:

Page 313 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
39 EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE
The Proposal shall include a statement that the insurance requirements set forth in the contract documents can be obtained and will be carried without reservation or exclusion should Proposer be awarded a contract pursuant to this RFP.

The successful Proposer shall at all times during the term of the awarded Agreement, carry, maintain, and keep in force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent A.M. Best’s Insurance Rating Guide, and approved by the CITY, a policy or policies of:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form CG 00 O1 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits.

There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another.

Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

B. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 O1 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per accident, combined single limit. If Contractor owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described in the preceding subsection. If Contractor or Contractor’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contractor shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

C. Workers' Compensation insurance on a state approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for all covered losses.

D. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate to the profession, written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy limit shall be not less than $2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of' the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this Agreement. City, it’s officers, employees, attorneys, and designated volunteers shall be named as additional insured on the policy, or policies, as to commercial general liability bodily injury and property damage coverage’s and automobile coverage’s with respect to liability arising out of successful Proposer’s work under this Agreement.

E. All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non-renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving City thirty (30) days' prior

Page 314 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
40 written notice thereof. Any such thirty (30) day notice shall be submitted to City via certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to "Risk Manager," City of Montebello, 1600 West Beverly Boulevard, Montebello, California, 90640. Contractor agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify said insurance coverage.

F. Contractor shall submit to City (i) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (ii) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement".

Page 315 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
41 EXHIBIT D
RFP No. 24-7

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (BSIP) CONSULTING SERVICES

COST PROPOSAL SHEET
In accordance with the Request for Proposal issued by the City of Montebello Transportation Department), the undersigned proposing company (“Consultant/Proposer”) hereby agrees to furnish all necessary labor, materials and incidentals required for the above stated contract as set forth in the Scope of Work and any addenda thereto, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein.

TASK 1: Bus Shelter Inventory $
TASK 2: Design Recommendations $
TASK 3: Amenity Recommendations $
TASK 4: Bus Stop Assessment for Bus Stop Improvement Project $ TASK 5: Plan and Design of Development Phase/RFP Creation $ TOTAL FIRM-FIXED PRICE $
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
Contact Information:

Name & Job Title:

Business Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Phone Number:

List other costs/fees: Description

Page 316 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
42 E-mail Address:

Authorized Signature: Date:

Page 317 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7

EXHIBIT E

STATEMENT OF

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PARTICIPATION
This proposal provides for the following Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Firm Name
Address
Phone Number
Type of Business
Current DBE Certification? Yes* *No
*(If "Yes," attach copy of current Letter of Certification and copy of current Statement of Personal Net Worth.)
Total $
% of Total Contract
Signature: Date:

Page 318 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
44 EXHIBIT F
Bidder’s List of Subcontractors (DBE and Non-DBE)
Part I
The bidder shall list all subcontractors (both DBE and non-DBE) in accordance with Section 2-1.054 the Standard Specification and per Title 49, Section 26.11 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This listing is required in addition to listing DBE Subcontractors elsewhere in the proposal. Photocopy this form for additional firms.

Firm Name/
Address/
City, State, ZIP
Phone/
Fax
Annual Gross
Receipts
Description of Portion of Work to be
Performed
Local Agency Use Only
(Certified DBE?)
Name < $1 million YES
< $5 million NO
Phone
Address < $10 million If YES list DBE #:
< $15 million
City State ZIP > $15 million Age of Firm (Yrs.)
Fax
Name < $1 million YES
< $5 million NO
Phone
Address < $10 million If YES list DBE #:
< $15 million
City State ZIP > $15 million Age of Firm (Yrs.)
Fax
Name < $1 million YES
< $5 million NO
Phone
Address < $10 million If YES list DBE #:
< $15 million
City State ZIP > $15 million Age of Firm (Yrs.)
Fax

Page 319 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
45 Part II
The bidder shall list all subcontractors who provided a quote or bid but were not selected to participate as a subcontractor on this project. This is required for compliance with Title 49, Section 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Photocopy this form for additional firms.

Firm Name/
Address/
City, State, ZIP
Phone/
Fax Annual Gross Receipts Description of Portion of Work to be Performed
Local Agency
Use Only
(Certified
DBE?)
Name < $1 million YES
< $5 million NO
Phone
< $10 million If YES list DBE
#:

Address
< $15 million
> $15 million Age of Firm
(Yrs.)
City State ZIP
Fax
Name < $1 million YES
< $5 million NO
Phone
< $10 million If YES list DBE
#:

Address
< $15 million
> $15 million Age of Firm
(Yrs.)
City State ZIP
Fax

Page 320 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
46 EXHIBIT G

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS

1.1 Federal Funding, Incorporation of FTA Terms
The preceding provisions include, in part, certain standard terms and conditions required by the U.S.

Department of Transportation ("DOT"), whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding contract provisions. All contractual provisions required by DOT, as set forth in Federal Transit Administration ("FTA") Circular 4220.1F or its successors are hereby incorporated by reference. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA-mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act or refuse to comply with any AGENCY requests that would cause AGENCY to be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions.

1.2 Federal Changes
The CONTRACTOR shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Master Agreement between AGENCY and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term of this Contract. CONTRACTOR'S failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

1.3 No Government Obligation to Third Parties
The AGENCY and CONTRACTOR acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the Federal Government in or approval of the solicitation or award of the underlying Contract, absent the express written consent by the Federal Government, the Federal Government is not a part to this Contract and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the AGENCY, CONTRACTOR, or any other party (whether or not a party to that Contract) pertaining to any matter resulting from the underlying Contract.

The CONTRACTOR agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clause shall not be modified, except to identify the Subcontractor who will be subject to its provisions.

1.4 Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801, et seq. and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 C.F.R.

Part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this project. Upon execution of the underlying Contract, the CONTRACTOR certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying Contract of the FTA-assisted project for which this Contract work is being performed.

In addition to other penalties that may be applicable, the CONTRACTOR further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the CONTRACTOR to the extend the Federal Government deems appropriate.

The CONTRACTOR also acknowledges that if it makes, or caused to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification to the Federal Government under a contract connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance originally awarded by

Page 321 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
47 FTA under the authority of 49 U.S.C. § 5307, the Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 49 U.S.C. § 5307(n)(1) on the CONTRACTOR, to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate.

The CONTRACTOR agrees to include the above two clauses in each sub-contract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by the FTA. It is further agreed that the clauses shall not be modified, except to identify the Sub-contractor who will be subject to the provisions.

1.5 Inspection and Retention of Records
The CONTRACTOR shall permit authorized representatives of the AGENCY, the FTA Administrator, and the Comptroller General of the United States to inspect and audit all data and records of the CONTRACTOR relating to its performance and its sub-contracts under this Contract from the date of the Contract through and until the expiration of three years after the date of termination or expiration of this Contract, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this Contract, in which case CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain same until the AGENCY, the FTA Administrator, and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, have disposed of all such litigation, appeals, claims or exceptions related thereto. The AGENCY retains ownership of all project documents and records maintained by the CONTRACTOR on behalf of the AGENCY.

1.6 Suspension and Debarment
This Contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 49 CFR Part 29. As such, the CONTRACTOR is required to verify that none of the CONTRACTOR, its principals, as such defined at 49 CFR 29.995, or affiliates, as defined at 49 CFR 29.905, are excluded or disqualified as defined at 49 CFR 29.940 and 29.945.

The CONTRACTOR is required to comply with 49 CFR 29, Subpart C and must include this requirement to comply with 49 CFR 29, Subpart C in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.

By signing and submitting its bid or proposal, the Bidder or Proposer certifies as follows:

The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact relied upon by the AGENCY. If it is later determined that the Bidder or Proposer knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to remedies available to the AGENCY, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. The Bidder or Proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 CFR 29, Subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this proposal. The Bidder or Proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.

1.7 Termination
Pursuant to the Contract, in the event that either Party hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Contract at the time and in the manner required, the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party written notice of the default, the nature of the default, and of the steps necessary to cure the default.

For any breach deemed by the non-defaulting party to constitute a material breach, the defaulting party is required to cure the breach within five (5) calendar days upon receipt of written notice. For any breach deemed by the non-defaulting party to constitute a non-material breach, the defaulting party is obligated to cure such breach within ten (10) calendar days upon receipt of written notice. However, if the nature

Page 322 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
48 of the non-material breach requires more than ten (10) days to cure, the defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days to diligently pursue and complete a cure.

In addition to any other available legal or equitable rights or remedies, if the default is not cured within the time periods described above, the non-defaulting party may terminate this Contract by giving written notice thereof to the defaulting party, setting forth the effective date thereof.

The AGENCY shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Contract in whole, or in part, by giving ten (10) business days' written notice to CONTRACTOR. Upon the termination of this Contract as provided herein, the AGENCY shall provide to CONTRACTOR the part of Compensation which would otherwise be payable to CONTRACTOR for services CONTRACTOR had completed as of the date of termination, less the amount of all previous payment with respect to the Compensation. Further, upon such a termination for convenience by AGENCY, the Parties agree that CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed for any "non-refundable" costs that CONTRACTOR has incurred for its services under this Contract, provided that: (1) such "non-refundable" costs were incurred by the CONTRACTOR prior to the date of termination, and (2) that CONTRACTOR provides the AGENCY with adequate proof that CONTRACTOR incurred the costs, and is unable to be seek a refund for such costs.

Such "non-refundable" costs may include, but are not limited to, travel reservations incurred by CONTRACTOR for its performance of services under this Contract. CONTRACTOR agrees to cease all work under this Contract on or before the effective date of any notice of termination. Pursuant to the Contract, all AGENCY data, documents, objects, materials or other tangible things shall be returned to the AGENCY upon the termination or expiration of this Contract.

1.8 Civil Rights Requirements
During the performance of this Contract, the CONTRACTOR agrees as follows:

1. Nondiscrimination - In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the CONTRACTOR agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, age, or disability.

2. Equal Employment Opportunity - The following equal employment opportunity requirements apply to the underlying Contract:
(a) Race, Color, Creed, National Origin, Sex - The CONTRACTOR agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
(b) Age - The CONTRACTOR agrees to refrain from discrimination against present and prospective employees for reason of age.
(c) Disabilities - The CONTRACTOR agrees that it will comply with the requirements of U.S.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act," 29 C.F.R. Part 1630, pertaining to employment of persons with disabilities.

Page 323 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
49 3. The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA, modified only if necessary to identify the affected parties.

1.9 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)

1. AGENCY Assurance: AGENCY shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)-assisted contract, or in the administration of its DBE Program.

AGENCY shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under Part 26, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOTassisted contracts. AGENCY'S DBE Program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26, and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this Contract. Implementation of this DBE Program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this Contract. Upon notification to AGENCY of its failure to carry out its approved program, the DOT and/or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. §§ 3801 et seq.).

2. Annual Overall Goal: In accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs," the AGENCY is required to establish an annual overall goal for the participation of DBEs in all contracts utilizing federal financial assistance. For the current fiscal year, the AGENCY has established a DBE participation goal of five percent (5%).

AGENCY'S annual overall goal represents the amount of ready, willing, and able DBEs that are identified as available to participate in contracting opportunities, and is reflective of the amount of DBE participation AGENCY would expect absent the effects of discrimination.

3. Contract Goals: AGENCY intends to meet its goal to the maximum extent feasible through raceneutral measures, including the encouragement of DBE participation on contracts which have no specific DBE goal. Where race-neutral measures are inadequate to meet the annual overall goal, AGENCY will establish specific contract goals for particular projects with subcontracting opportunities.

There is no DBE project goal established for this project. At this time AGENCY will meet DBE goal on federally assisted projects through race neutral measures. AGENCY supports the use of race neutral measures to facilitate participation by DBEs and other small businesses, and encourages prime contractors to subcontract portions of their work that might otherwise perform with their own forces.

4. Good Faith Efforts: If a specific DBE participation goal is identified in the above Section 5.9.3, a proposer must demonstrate that it can meet this specified goal in the performance of this Contract in order for the proposal to be determined a responsive proposal. If a proposer cannot meet the specified goal, the proposer must demonstrate that it performed sufficient good faith efforts to meet the goal. A proposer who is not responsive shall be ineligible for award of contract.

Page 324 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
50 Determination of Good Faith Efforts: If the amount of DBE participation does not meet the Contract-specific goal, the DBE Officer shall review the good faith effort report submitted by the proposer. The DBE Officer shall determine whether the proposer has performed the quality, quantity, and intensity of efforts that demonstrates a reasonably active and aggressive attempt to meet the Contract-specific goal.

The kinds of effort that will be considered demonstrative of "Good Faith Efforts" include, but are not limited to, the following: Whether the CONTRACTOR solicited through all reasonable and available means (e.g., attendance at pre-proposal meetings, advertising and/or written notices) the interest of all certified DBEs who have the capability to perform the work; whether the CONTRACTOR solicited interest within sufficient time to allow the DBEs to respond and, if appropriate steps were taken, to follow-up with interested DBEs; whether the CONTRACTOR selected portions of work to be performed by DBEs and, where appropriate, broke-out contract work items into economically feasible units to facilitate DBE participation even when the CONTRACTOR might otherwise prefer to perform these work items with its own forces; whether the CONTRACTOR negotiated in good faith with interested DBEs (evidence includes names, addresses, and phone numbers; description of information provided regarding plans and specifications; and evidence as to why additional agreements could not be reached); whether the CONTRACTOR made efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials, or related assistance or services; whether the CONTRACTOR made efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance; whether the CONTRACTOR effectively used the services of available minority/women community organizations, contractors' groups, or other organizations to provide assistance; and whether other proposers on the procurement met the DBE goal.

Proposer's Right to Administrative Reconsideration: In the event that the DBE Officer determines that the responsible proposer has not met the Contract-specific goal, and has not demonstrated good faith efforts, the DBE Officer will notify the proposer in writing. The notification shall explain the basis and include the reasons for the determination, and shall inform the proposer of its right to submit further written documentation or appear before the Reconsideration Official prior to the time that a recommendation for award of contract is presented to the City Council. (The Reconsideration Official is a CITY representative who did not take part in the original determination.) After reconsideration, AGENCY shall provide the proposer with a written decision.

The result of the reconsideration process is not appealable by the proposer.

In the event that the Reconsideration Official finds that the proposer has not met the Contract goal or demonstrated good faith efforts, AGENCY will deem said proposer not responsible and evaluate the proposer submitting the next proposal.

5. CONTRACTOR Compliance with AGENCY DBE Policy: It is the policy of AGENCY to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts and to create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for contracts and subcontracts relating to AGENCY'S construction, procurement, and professional services activities. To this end, AGENCY has developed procedures to remove barriers to DBE participation in the proposal and award process and to assist DBEs to develop and compete successfully outside of the DBE program.

In connection with the performance of this Contract, the CONTRACTOR will cooperate with AGENCY in meeting these commitments and objectives.

Page 325 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
51 6. Required Proposal/Proposal Submittals: The CONTRACTOR shall submit with its Proposal the name and address of each Sub-contractor it intends to employ, a description of the work which the Sub-contractor is to do, the dollar amount of each Sub-contractor contract, and such other information as may be required in order that AGENCY'S approval may be obtained as to reliability and ability to perform the work (Bidders List of Participating Firms).

In addition, proposer shall submit within five (5) days of proposal opening the names and addresses of all DBE firms that will participate in the Contract; a description of the work that each DBE will perform; the dollar amount of the participation of each DBE firm; written documentation of commitment to use DBE Subcontractors whose participation the CONTRACTOR submits to meet the Contract goal; and written confirmation from the DBE that it is participating in the Contract as provided in the CONTRACTOR's commitment. (Statement of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation)
AGENCY shall require that any DBEs listed by proposers for participation in the Contract be certified as eligible DBEs. AGENCY will accept current certifications by the DOT and its agencies, the Small Business Administration, or other DOT federal financial assistance recipients, as appropriate. Within five (5) days of proposal opening, DBEs with current certification must attach a copy of their current Letter of Certification and a copy of their current Statement of Personal Net Worth.

AGENCY will require any firm listed, but not currently certified as a DBE, to submit the proper certification information within five (5) days of proposal opening in order to be included in the proposer's DBE achievement.

7. CONTRACTOR Assurance: Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 26, the CONTRACTOR is required to make the following assurance in its agreement with AGENCY and to include this assurance in any agreements it makes with subcontractors in the performance of this Contract:
"The CONTRACTOR or Sub-contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Contract. The CONTRACTOR shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the CONTRACTOR or Subcontractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Contract, which may result in the termination of this Contract or such other remedy, as AGENCY deems appropriate."

8. Prompt Payment to Subcontractors: The CONTRACTOR must pay Subcontractors for satisfactory performance of their contracts no later than 15 days from the receipt of payment made to the CONTRACTOR by AGENCY. Prompt return of retainage payments from the CONTRACTOR to the Subcontractor will be made within 15 days after the Subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed.

Any delay or postponement of payment among the parties may take place only for good cause and with AGENCY'S prior written approval. If the CONTRACTOR determines the work of the Subcontractor to be unsatisfactory, it must notify AGENCY'S DBE Officer immediately in writing and state the reasons. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to comply with this requirement will be construed to be a breach of contract and subject to contract termination.

Page 326 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
52 9. Reports of Payment to DBE Sub-contractors: The DBE Officer will monitor the amount actually paid by the CONTRACTOR to Subcontractors, and will require the CONTRACTOR to provide monthly reports of payments to DBEs. A letter will be sent to the DBE Subcontractors to verify the dollar amount.

The amount awarded to the DBE, the amount paid to the DBE as stated by the CONTRACTOR, and the amount paid to the DBE as verified by the DBE, will be reported to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

10. Contract Change or Amendment: When a contract change or amendment is made, the CONTRACTOR will submit a statement to the DBE Officer regarding how the change may affect DBE subcontracting.

11. Reporting DBE Participation: The CONTRACTOR is required to report all DBE participation on their contract whether or not the contract contains a specified DBE goal. The CONTRACTOR is not to count participation of a DBE Subcontractor until the amount being counted has been paid to the DBE.

12. Counting DBE Participation toward the Contract Goal: Only the work actually performed by a DBE will be counted towards the DBE goal. The cost of supplies and materials obtained by the DBE or equipment leased (except from the CONTRACTOR or its affiliate) may also be counted.

Commercially Useful Function: Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count toward DBE goals. Expenditures may only be counted if the DBE is performing a commercially useful function. A DBE should perform at least 30 percent of the total cost of its contract with its own work force. Decisions on commercially useful function are subject to review by the FTA, but are not administratively appealable to DOT.

If materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, 100 percent of the cost will be counted. If the materials and supplies are purchased from a DBE regular dealer, 60 percent of the cost will be counted.

13. DBE Replacement: The CONTRACTOR must make a good faith effort to replace a defaulting DBE Subcontractor with another certified DBE. The CONTRACTOR must immediately notify the DBE Officer of the DBE's inability to perform, and provide reasonable documentation. The CONTRACTOR must receive prior written approval on the substitute DBE from AGENCY. The CONTRACTOR will provide copies of new or amended subcontracts and copies of the substitute DBE's current Letter of Certification and current Statement of Personal Net Worth.

If the CONTRACTOR proposes to replace a DBE Subcontractor with a non-DBE, sufficient good faith efforts documentation must be provided. If the CONTRACTOR fails or refuses to comply in the time specified, AGENCY will issue an order stopping all, or part of, payment/work until satisfactory action has been taken. If the CONTRACTOR still fails to comply, AGENCY may issue a termination for default proceeding.

14. Evaluation of Proposals with DBE Goals: After the proposal opening, or submission of proposals, the DBE Officer shall evaluate all proposals with regard to the DBE requirements to determine a recommendation for award of contract. The responsible proposer, who also meets the Contractspecific goal or demonstrates good faith efforts, shall be recommended for contract award. In the

Page 327 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
53 event that the proposer does not meet the Contract-specific goal or demonstrate good faith efforts, the DBE Officer shall evaluate the next proposal.

1.10 Buy America
The Buy America requirement provides that federal funds may not be obligated for mass transportation projects unless steel, cement, and manufactured products used in such projects are produced in the United States. The requirement will not apply in the following four cases:

A. When its application is against the public interest (as decided by the FTA Administration on a caseby-case basis).

When the required materials and products are not produced in the U.S. in sufficient quantities and of satisfactory quality.

B. When, in the procurement of buses and other rolling stock, the cost of the components which are produced in the U.S. is more than 60 percent of the cost of all components of the vehicle or equipment, and if the final assembly takes place in the U.S.

C. When the inclusion of domestic material will increase the over-all cost of the project Contract by more than 10 percent in the case of projects for the acquisition of buses and rolling stocks; and 25 percent in the case of all other projects.

The CONTRACTOR, who seeks to establish grounds for an exception, must seek the exception, in writing, to the Purchasing Manager at least fifteen (15) days prior to proposal opening.

When a petition for investigation has been filed with FTA before award, the AGENCY reserves the right to not make an award prior to the resolution of the investigation by FTA and when a request for investigation has been filed with FTA before the opening of proposals, the AGENCY reserves the right to not open proposals prior to the resolution of the investigation by FTA.

The CONTRACTOR and all Sub-contractor with contracts of $100,000 or more are required to certify compliance or non-compliance with this provision by submitting the attached "Buy America Certificate", with the proposal.

1.11 Remedies/Sanctions for Breach of Contract
Pursuant to the Contract, the AGENCY may terminate the Contract if the successful Proposer breaches the terms or violates the conditions of the Contract, and does not cure such breach or violation within the specified time period. The successful Proposer shall be liable for any and all costs incurred by AGENCY as a result of such default, including but not limited to re-procurement costs of the same or similar services defaulted by the successful Proposer under this Contract [49CFR 18.36(i)(2)1

1.12 Federal Prohibited Interest
No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Contract or to any benefit arising therefrom {FTA Grant Agreement, Part II, Sec. 114 (11)}.

1.13 Lobbying
CONTRACTORS who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the certification required by 49 C.F.R. Part 20, "New Restrictions on Lobbying." Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting

Page 328 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
54 to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier shall also disclose the name of any registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 who has made lobbying contacts on its behalf with non-Federal funds with respect to that Federal contract, grant or award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient.

If the successful offeror, and/or primary Sub-contractor, did engage in lobbying activities, then OMB Standard Form LLL "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities" must also be completed and submitted to AGENCY.

Form is available upon request.

1.14 Clean Air Requirements
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. The CONTRACTOR agrees to report each violation to the AGENCY and understands and agrees that the AGENCY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office.

The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.

1.15 Clean Water Requirements
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. The CONTRACTOR agrees to report each violation to the AGENCY and understands and agrees that the AGENCY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office.

The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.

1.16 Cargo Preference
The CONTRACTOR agrees to the following clauses for the purchase of equipment, materials or commodities that may be transported by ocean vessel in carrying out the project:

A. To use privately owned United States-Flag commercial vessels to ship at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage (computed separately for dry bulk carriers, dry cargo liners, and tankers) involved, whenever shipping any equipment, material or commodities pursuant to the underlying contract to the extent such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates for United States-Flag commercial vessels.

B. To furnish within 20 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating within the United States, or within 30 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating outside the United States, a legible copy of a rated, "on-board" commercial ocean billof-lading in English for each shipment of cargo described in the preceding paragraph to the Division of National Cargo, Office of Market Development, Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590, and to AGENCY (through the CONTRACTOR in the case of a Sub-contractor's bill-oflading).

C. To include these requirements in all sub-contracts issued pursuant to this Contract.

Page 329 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
55 1.17 Fly America Requirements
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. § 40118 (the "Fly America" Act) in accordance with the General Services Administration's regulations at 41 CFR Part 301-10, which provide that recipients and subrecipients of Federal funds and their contractors are required to use U.S. Flag air carriers for U.S Government-financed international air travel and transportation of their personal effects or property, to the extent such service is available, unless travel by foreign air carrier is a matter of necessity, as defined by the Fly America Act. The CONTRACTOR shall submit, if a foreign air carrier was used, an appropriate certification or memorandum adequately explaining why service by a U.S. flag air carrier was not available or why it was necessary to use a foreign air carrier and shall, in any event, provide a certificate of compliance with the Fly America requirements. The CONTRACTOR agrees to include the requirements of this section in all subcontracts that may involve international air transportation.

1.18 State Labor Provisions/ Labor Compliance/ Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act

1. Prevailing Wage Rates: Attention is directed to the requirement that no less than the Prevailing Wage Rates shall be paid on this project. Certified Payrolls on AGENCY-approved State forms are required for all workmen. Rates of pay will be current State of California, as shown in the "General Prevailing Wage Rate" Manual as determined by the State Director of Industrial Relations.

CONTRACTOR agrees to abide by the provisions of the State Labor Code, and to comply with the prevailing rates of wages and apprenticeship employment standards established by the State Director of Industrial Relations. FTA Grant Agreements, part II, section 119 (a).

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1770 of the California Labor Code of the State of California, not less than the general prevailing rate of wages (which rate includes employer payments for health and welfare, vacation, pension and similar purposes) applicable to the work to be done, shall be maintained at all times during the course of the Contract. These rates are made a part of this Contract by reference. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with Section 177.5 of the Labor Code of State of California for all apprentice-able occupations.

2. Labor Compliance. It is the policy of AGENCY that all CONTRACTORS and Sub- contractors engaged in public works construction shall adhere to applicable laws and regulations. In accordance with this policy, for the duration of this Contract, AGENCY shall institute a labor compliance program to monitor compliance. The .CONTRACTOR shall cooperate fully with Labor Compliance monitoring efforts and the representatives engaged in this effort.

Because this project is subject to the provisions of State and Federal law governing public works contracts, all pertinent statutes and regulations are hereby incorporated by reference into this document as if set forth in their entirety, including Copeland Anti-Kickback Act requirements of 29 CFR part 3, Davis-Bacon and Related Act requirements of 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5, and Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act requirements of Section 107, 40 U.S.C. § 333 and 29 CFR part 1926. CONTRACTORS and Sub-contractors by entering into, or performing work under, this project agree to comply with all provisions of the law that apply to public works. It is the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to obtain and adhere to the latest edition of the statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the following:

A. Apprentices - All apprentices employed on this project shall be bona fide apprentices registered with the State of California, Division of Apprenticeship Standards.

Page 330 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
56 B. Certified Payroll - All CONTRACTORS shall submit weekly certified payroll records for all laborers and mechanics furnishing labor to the project not later than ten calendar days after the closed payroll period.

C. Payment Of The Prevailing Wage - The CONTRACTOR and all Sub-contractors under him shall pay not less than the specified prevailing wage rate to all workmen employed in the execution of the contract.

D. Working Hours - The CONTRACTOR shall pay workers employed on the Contract not less than the appropriately specified straight time and overtime prevailing wages for all hours worked.

E. Employee Interviews - AGENCY, through its representatives, will conduct weekly on-site interviews of workers employed on the Contract. The interviews shall be conducted without the interference or obstruction of the CONTRACTOR. No worker who is interviewed is to be threatened, coerced, or intimidated.

Violations: AGENCY will take cognizance of violations of the prevailing wage and public works laws committed during the course of this Contract. Such evidence of violation may result in the assessment of penalties and forfeitures to the fullest extent allowed by law until compliance has been strictly effectuated. AGENCY may suspend or terminate a contract, or debar a CONTRACTOR from future contracts, for breach of the Labor Compliance Requirements. 4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
A. Overtime requirements - No CONTRACTOR or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.

B. Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages - In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in subparagraph (b) (1) of 29 CFR Section 5.5, the CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor responsible therefore shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such CONTRACTOR and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in subparagraph (b) (1) of 29 CFR Section 5.5 in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in subparagraph (b) (1) of 29 CFR Section

5.5. C. Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages — AGENCY shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the CONTRACTOR or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime CONTRACTOR, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime CONTRACTOR, such sums as

Page 331 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
57 may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such CONTRACTOR or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in subparagraph (b) (2) of 29 CFR Section 5.5.

D. Subcontracts - The CONTRACTOR or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in this section.

E. Payrolls and basic records - (i) Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the CONTRACTOR during the course of the work and preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937, or under the Housing Act of 1949, in the construction or development of the project). Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each such worker, his or her correct classification, hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fidefringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made and actual wages paid. Whenever the Secretary of Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv) that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act, the CONTRACTOR shall maintain records which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially responsible, and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected, and records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits. CONTRACTORS employing apprentices or trainees under approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs, the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs.

1.19 Seismic Safety
The CONTRACTOR agrees that any new building or addition to an existing building will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards for Seismic Safety required in Department of Transportation Seismic Safety Regulations 49 CFR Part 41 and will certify to compliance to the extent required by the regulation. The CONTRACTOR also agrees to ensure that all work performed under this Contract including work performed by a subcontractor is in compliance with the standards required by the Seismic Safety Regulations and the certification of compliance issued on the project.

1.20 Safety and Health Regulation
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. § 333, and applicable U.S. Department of Labor regulations, "Safety and Health Regulations for Construction" 29 C.F.R. Part 1926. Among other things, the CONTRACTOR agrees that it will not require any laborer or mechanic to work in unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous surroundings or working conditions. The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include the requirements of this section in each subcontract.

1.21 Federal Energy Conservation Requirements
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency that are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.

Page 332 of 840 ends

RFP No. 24-7
58 1.22 Recycled Products
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all the requirements of Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6962), including but not limited to the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247, and Executive Order 12873, as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 247.

The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include these requirements in each sub-contract.

5.23 Access Requirements for Individuals with Disabilities The Prime CONTRACTOR and all Sub-contractors on this project are required to comply with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.; section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794; section 16 of the Federal Transit Act, as amended, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1612; and the following regulations and any amendments thereto:

A. U.S. DOT regulations, "Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities (ADA)," 49 C.F.R.

Part 37;
B. U.S. DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance," 49 C.F.R. Part 27; C. U.S. DOT regulations, "Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Accessibility Specifications for Transportation Vehicles," 49 C.F.R. Part 38;
D. Department of Justice (DOJ) regulations, "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services," 28 C.F.R. Part 35;
E. DOJ regulations, "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities," 28 C.F.R. Part 36;
F. General Services Administration regulations, "Accommodations for the Physically Handicapped," 41 C.F.R. Subpart 101-19.

G. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act," 29 C.F.R. Part 1630; H. Federal Communications Commission regulations, "Telecommunications Relay Services and Related Customer Premises Equipment for the Hearing and Speech Disabled," 47 C.F.R. Part 64, Subpart F; and
I. FTA regulations, "Transportation for Elderly and Handicapped Persons," 49 C.F.R. Part 609.

1.24 Privacy Act
The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with, and assures the compliance of its employees with, the information restrictions and other applicable requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a.

The CONTRACTOR also agrees to include these requirements in each sub-contract.

1.25 Prohibited Interest
No Council member, officer, or employee of the AGENCY or of a local Public Body during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. If any such interest comes to the knowledge of any party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made in writing to the other parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 of Chapter 1 of Division 4 of Title 1 (Sections 1090- 1097) of the Government code of the State of California.

5.26 Drug-Free Workplace
The CONTRACTOR, and all Sub-contractors, must certify that they have a drug-free workplace and comply with Government Code Section 8355 (Certification of Drug-Free Workplace).

Page 333 of 840 ends

ATTACHMENT C

Page 334 of 840 ends
Page 335 of 840 ends
Page 336 of 840 ends
Page 337 of 840 ends
Page 338 of 840 ends
Page 339 of 840 ends
Page 340 of 840 ends
Page 341 of 840 ends
Page 342 of 840 ends
Page 343 of 840 ends
Page 344 of 840 ends
Page 345 of 840 ends
Page 346 of 840 ends
Page 347 of 840 ends
Page 348 of 840 ends
Page 349 of 840 ends
Page 350 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – BSIP Implementation Estimate Page 1 MBL BSIP Implementation Cost Estimate
Implementation within Funding Limits
The MBL FY 2023-2025 Short Range Transit Plan set a total project cost for the Montebello Bus Stop Improvement Project of $2,713,000 in the Capital Project Summary, with $2,570,000 from federal funding sources and $143,000 from state and local funding.

The following estimate starts with the highest priority stops from the Bus Stop Assessment implementation plan and adds stop costs until the total of $2.7M is reached.

Methodology
Infrastructure
The infrastructure cost for each stop is built up from the unit cost of each possible infrastructure component needed, determined by the stop typology. Some stops carry extra removal costs; for instance, stops 1086 and 4032 each have two existing shelters requiring dual removal fees before a single new one is installed. Stops without certain infrastructure currently, like no pole because the sign is mounted on a street post or no trash can, do not have removal costs for those items.

ADA Compliance Upgrades
The cost of sidewalk reconstruction to ensure ADA compliance is calculated separately in a second block and added to each stop's infrastructure subtotal. Sidewalk reconstruction costs vary across stops because the underlying ADA deficiencies differ in type, severity, and existing sidewalk dimensions.

Slope violation costs differ based on how wide and long the current sidewalk is at each location. The estimate assumes 15 feet of added concrete on either side of a shelter and 30 feet width at enhanced and basic stops. Stops with two shelter bays (like stops 1086 and 4032) require reconstruction along a wider, longer footprint (35 ft), while stops 50116 and 1096 have narrower 8-foot sidewalks where only slope corrections are needed, yielding a lower cost. Stops 4052, 2007, and 40101 have non-compliant landing pads (including a slope issue also noted at 40101). Stop 1037 uses a 12-foot width assumption to accommodate both a landing pad and slope correction. One stop (2035) has a passageway violation, but this can be resolved through improved placement of the new amenities, so no separate ADA cost is added.

Soft Costs and Contingency
Soft costs and contingency scale the $1.53M construction base up to the ~$2.74M project total. Five types of additional project costs are applied and calculated as percentages of the base. Two flat-rate items, SWPPP/inlet protection and maintenance of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, are multiplied by the 16-stop count. Together these soft costs bring the project subtotal to roughly $2.28M, and a final 20% contingency is layered on top to arrive at the overall project total of approximately $2.7M.

ATTACHMENT D

Page 351 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – BSIP Implementation Estimate Page 2 Cost Estimate
Stop # 1086 4032 1082 1047 2072 4024 4052 1090 40101 50116 2007 1092 1096 2035 1045 1037 Type Premium Premium Premium Premium Premium Enhanced Enhanced Premium Enhanced Premium Basic Premium Premium Enhanced Premium Premium Infrastructure Cost
Shelter removal and
disposal $3,500 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
Shelter $50,000 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
Reconstruct ADA deficient
sidewalks at shelter $8,640 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Reconstruct ADA deficient
sidewalks w/o shelter $7,200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Reconstruct sidewalks for
landing pad $7,200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Correct deficient
passageway
$25,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Bench removal and
disposal $500 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Bench $1,500 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Pole removal and disposal $150 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 Furnish and install pole
and sign $1,200 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0
Trash receptacle removal
and disposal $500 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
Trash receptacle $1,950 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 Integrated trash receptacle $300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 NextBus Digital Signs $17,000 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Digital Advertising $50,000 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Stop Infrastructure Total $128,950 $129,450 $124,950 $124,950 $124,950 $5,300 $5,800 $124,950 $5,800 $124,950 $1,650 $126,150 $126,300 $5,800 $124,950 $124,950 ADA Upgrades
Noncompliant sidewalk
(slope)
Cost to
Fix
$16,760 $14,160 $7,800 $8,640 $7,800 $7,200 $0 $6,960 $0 $5,280 $0 $8,640 $5,280 $0 $8,640 $8,640 Landing pad not compliant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800 $0 $4,800 $0 $4,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Passageway $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stop Total Cost $145,710 $143,610 $132,750 $133,590 $132,750 $12,500 $10,600 $131,910 $10,600 $130,230 $6,450 $134,790 $131,580 $5,800 $133,590 $133,590

Page 352 of 840 ends

City of Montebello BSIP – BSIP Implementation Estimate Page 3 Stop Total $1,528,850
Soft Costs and Contingency
Agency Costs 6% $91,700
Project / Construction Management 6% $91,700
Construction Survey 10% $152,900
Mobilization / Demobilization 10% $152,900
SWPPP / Inlet protection $500 $8,000
Maintenance of Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic $1,500 $24,000 Contractor General Conditions, Insurance, Bonds, Fee 15% $229,300 Project Subtotal $2,279,350
Contingency 20% $455,900
Project Total $2,735,250

Page 353 of 840 ends

ITEM # 9

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: Cesar Roldan, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZATION TO

SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE WHITTIER BOULEVARD PAVING THE WAY
PROJECT (CAPITAL PROJECT NO. 889)
DATE: August 26, 2026
RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve Environmental Assessment pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and

2. Adopt the completed plans and specifications for the Whittier Blvd. Paving the Way Capital Project No. 889; and

3. Authorize the Public Works Director to solicit bids pursuant to the California Public Contract Code, the City of Montebello Municipal Code, and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook); and

4. Direct staff to return to City Council with a recommendation for contract award following bid evaluation; and

5. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this action will allow staff to proceed with the bidding phase of this capital project. The project is funded through bond proceeds of the "Paving the Way" capital improvement program. Sufficient funding has been appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2026- 27 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget. Following completion of the bidding and evaluation process, staff will return to the City Council with a fully defined project budget and recommendation for award of the construction contract.

Page 354 of 840 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Whittier Boulevard is a major arterial roadway within the City of Montebello experiencing substantial daily traffic, commercial activity, and transit operations. The roadway pavement has deteriorated due to vehicular loading, weather impacts, and age. Public Works staff have determined that resurfacing is required to restore pavement integrity, maintain safety, and extend the service life of the roadway. The project consists of cold milling, pavement removal, asphalt resurfacing, crack sealing, traffic control, and pavement striping.

The issuance of a Notice Inviting Bids initiates the legally required competitive bidding process. The City Council is required to approve and adopt plans, specifications and working details, and authorize the bid request for all public projects. The City adopts and utilizes the current edition of the Greenbook as its baseline engineering standard.

Greenbook compliance ensures uniformity, high-quality construction practices, and industry-standard specifications for asphalt resurfacing. Relevant sections include:
• Section 200 – Material Specifications
• Section 300 – Construction Materials and Methods
• Section 400 – Flexible Pavement Requirements
The bid advertisement is consistent with Public Contract Code sections 20161 and 20162, which mandate California public works projects to be competitively bid. This action is also consistent with Montebello Municipal Code 3.20.110 - Bidding procedure prescribed.

With the City Council's approval, staff will advertise the project for bid in a local newspaper of general circulation and submit the Notice Inviting Bid (NIB) to Planet Bids.

The following tentative schedule has been identified for the bid process:

Tasks Timeline
City Council authorization to solicit bids for
construction
August 27, 2026 to September 23,
2026 at 11:00 am
Request for Information – Questions posted
by bidders
September 10, 2026 at 12:00 pm
Response to bidders’ questions/Addendums September 17, 2026 at 5:00 pm Open Construction Bids September 23, 2026 at 11:00 am
City Council award construction contract
(Tentative)
October 14, 2026
Commence Construction November 2026
Close out Project April 2027
The City Clerk’s Office shall publish the NIB in a local newspaper of general circulation per Public Contract Code Sections 20170–20171, which outline requirements for notice publication, bid opening, and award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The

Page 355 of 840 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

notice shall be published for a minimum period of twenty-one (21) calendar days before the date of opening the bids per Public Contract Code Section 22037.

Following bid opening, staff will evaluate bids for responsiveness, responsibility, compliance with all specifications, and conformance with PCC provisions related to bidder qualifications. Staff will then return to the City Council with a recommendation for award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

The proposed project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The project consists of the resurfacing of Whittier Boulevard and constitutes routine maintenance and rehabilitation of an existing public roadway. The proposed improvements will occur within the existing roadway footprint and will not result in expansion of the existing road.

ANALYSIS:

N/A
SUMMARY:

Staff recommend the City Council approve the Environmental Assessment for the Whittier Boulevard Paving the Way resurfacing project (CP 889) and determine that the project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to section 15301 of the California Code of Regulations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Staff further recommend the City Council approve the 100% completed plans and specifications for the project and authorize staff to proceed with advertising the project for construction bids.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Attachment A - Plans CP 889

2. Attachment B - Specifications CP 889

3. Attachment C - CEQA Notice of Exemption CP 889

Page 356 of 840 ends

MONTEBELLO CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP / SCHOOL MONTEBELLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

POST OFFICE

FREMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

BEVERLY HOSPITAL

APARTMENT BUILDING

WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MONTEBELLO INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

MONTEBELLO HIGH SCHOOL

SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND MONTEBELLO PARK

MONTEBELLO PLYMOUTH
CHURCH

SHOPPING CENTER

SAINT BENEDICT PARISH CENTER AND SCHOOL
ST JOHNS E. S. AND CHURCH

MONTEBELLO INFANT-TODDLER CENTER

MONTEBELLO LAND & WATER CO

BEVERLY MEDICAL PLAZA

SHOPPING CENTER
CANTWELL-SACRED HEART OF MARY H. S.

MONTEBELLO SENIOR VILLAS

PICO RIVERA
E. LOS ANGELES INDEX OF DRAWINGS CIVIL ENGINEERING VICINITY MAP CIP NO. 889 WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROJECT LOCATION LEGEND: PROJECT UTILITY CONTACTS: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S NOTE: UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES: TITLE SHEET C-11 PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVIEWED BY: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A – PROJECT SITE PROJECT LOCATION Engineering Division Attachment A

Page 357 of 840 ends

C-22 GENERAL NOTES STORM WATER POLLUTION REQUIREMENT: GENERAL STRIPING, MARKING AND SIGNING NOTES: LIST OF STANDARD DRAWINGS: NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED): PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ABBREVIATIONS: SPPWC STANDARD PLANS 2021 EDITION: CALTRANS STANDARD DRAWINGS 2025 EDITION: LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 358 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A MATCHLINE STA 20+30

SEE BELOW LEFT WHITTIER BOULEVARD

GARFIELD AVENUE

VIA VISTA
STREET
MATCHLINE STA 20+30

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 41+00
SEE SHEET C-4 BOULEVARD C-33 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO STA 41+50 MATCHLINE STA 30+70
MATCHLINE STA 30+70

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
AVENUE
19TH STREET
WILCOX

AVENUE WHITTIER WHITTIER BOULEVARD
21ST
STREET
22ND
STREET
20TH

STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD

VIA CLEMENTE
STREET

EAST LOS ANGELES

CITY OF
MONTEBELLO LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE

CONCOURSE

SEE BELOW LEFT

Page 359 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division
MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235
I Exp. 12/31/27

REGI STERED

PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER
STATE

OF CA L I FORN I A
MATCHLINE STA 50+50

SEE BELOW LEFT WHITTIER BOULEVARD
MATCHLINE STA 50+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 70+50
SEE SHEET C-5 BOULEVARD C-4
4 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 41+50 TO STA 70+50 MATCHLINE STA 60+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 60+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 41+00
SEE SHEET C-3
18TH STREET

CALIFORNIA

AVENUE WHITTIER

VAIL AVENUE

MAPLE AVENUE
PARK

AVENUE WHITTIER
12TH

STREET BOULEVARD

TAYLOR AVENUE

GREENWOOD
AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE

Page 360 of 840 ends

MATCHLINE STA 79+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 79+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 99+50
SEE SHEET C-6 C-55 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 70+50 TO STA 99+50 MATCHLINE STA 89+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 89+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 70+50
SEE SHEET C-4
10TH STREET BOULEVARD
THIRD

STREET WHITTIER
SPRUCE
AVENUE

MONTEBELLO BOULEVARD
6TH STREET

FIFTH STREET
FOURTH STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI C IV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINEER STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A 7TH
STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE

Page 361 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-66 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 99+50 TO VAN NORMAN ROAD, TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS MATCHLINE STA 108+70 SEE BELOW LEFT MATCHLINE STA 99+50
SEE SHEET C-5 MATCHLINE STA 108+70

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
2ND STREET BOULEVARD

NATASHA

LANE WHITTIER
BLUFF
ROAD 1ST
STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD CITY OF PICO RIVERA CITY OF MONTEBELLO TYPICAL SECTION FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD - WITH MEDIAN TYPICAL SECTION FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD - WITHOUT MEDIAN ROAD VAN NORMAN LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE VARIABLE HEIGHT CONCRETE CURB DETAIL C-61NOTE:

WHITTIER BLVD.

BRIDGE
WHITTIER BLVD.

BRIDGE SLOT A.C. PAVING DETAIL C-62 CABLE MOUNTS C-63

Page 362 of 840 ends

STOP
30 30 STOP STOP STOP STOP PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING NOTES: GENERAL TRAFFIC STRIPING AND MARKINGS NOTES: LEGEND: 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A MATCHLINE STA 21+50
SEE BELOW LEFT WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH)

GARFIELD AVENUE
MATCHLINE STA 21+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 41+50
SEE SHEET C-8
BOULEVARD (30 MPH) C-77 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENRE STREET TO STA 41+50 MATCHLINE STA 31+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 31+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT

CONCOURSE AVENUE
19TH STREET
WILCOX
AVENUE WHITTIER WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH)
21ST
STREET
22ND
STREET
20TH

STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD VIA

CLEMENTE
STREET

EAST LOS ANGELES

CITY OF

MONTEBELLO

VIA VISTA

Page 363 of 840 ends

STOP STOP
WAIT
HERE
WAIT
HERE
HERE
WAIT
HERE

WAIT STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP
WAIT
HERE
WAIT
HERE
HERE
WAIT
HERE
WAIT
30 30 PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING NOTES: GENERAL TRAFFIC STRIPING AND MARKINGS NOTES: LEGEND: 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division
MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235
I Exp. 12/31/27

REGI STERED

PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER
STATE

OF CA L I FORN I A
MATCHLINE STA 50+50
SEE BELOW LEFT WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH)
MATCHLINE STA 50+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 70+56
SEE SHEET C-9
BOULEVARD (30 MPH) C-8
8 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 41+50 TO STA 70+56 MATCHLINE STA 60+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 60+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 41+50
SEE SHEET C-7
18TH STREET

CALIFORNIA

AVENUE WHITTIER

VAIL AVENUE

MAPLE AVENUE
PARK
AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH)
12TH
STREET

TAYLOR AVENUE

GREENWOOD

AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD

Page 364 of 840 ends

STOP STOP

WAIT WAIT
30 30 STOP
HERE
WAIT
HERE
WAIT
WAIT
HERE
WAIT
HERE PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING NOTES: GENERAL TRAFFIC STRIPING AND MARKINGS NOTES: LEGEND: 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A MATCHLINE STA 79+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA79+50

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCHLINE STA 99+50
SEE SHEET C-10 C-99 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 70+56 TO STA 99+50 MATCHLINE STA 89+50

SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCHLINE STA 89+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT MATCHLINE STA 70+56
SEE SHEET C-8
10TH
STREETBOULEVARD (30 MPH)
THIRD

STREET WHITTIER
SPRUCE
AVENUE

MONTEBELLO

BOULEVARD
6TH
STREET

FIFTH STREET
FOURTH STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH) WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH) WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD 7TH
STREET

Page 365 of 840 ends

STOP
30 30 STOP
30 30 PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING NOTES: GENERAL TRAFFIC STRIPING AND MARKINGS NOTES: LEGEND: 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-10 10 TRAFFIC STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND SIGNING PLAN FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM STA 99+50 TO VAN NORMAN ROAD MATCHLINE STA 108+70 SEE BELOW LEFT MATCHLINE STA 99+50
SEE SHEET C-9
MATCHLINE STA 108+70

SEE ABOVE RIGHT
2ND STREET BOULEVARD (30 MPH)

NATASHA

LANE WHITTIER
BLUFF
ROAD
FIRST
STREET
ROAD VAN NORMAN WHITTIER BOULEVARD (30 MPH) WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD CITY OF PICO RIVERA CITY OF MONTEBELLO DETAIL "A" - PARKING SPACE MARKING DETAIL "B" - CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK STRIPING PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24F SIGN LEGEND R1-5 WHITTIER BLVD.

BRIDGE
WHITTIER BLVD.

BRIDGE R9-3 CUSTOM R9-3

Page 366 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & VIA VIASTA (INT ID 593) WHITTIER BLVD. PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A VIA VIASTA WHITTIER BLVD.

VIA VIASTA NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VIA VISTA INT ID 593, RAMP ID 2957 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VIA VISTA INT ID 593, RAMP ID 2956 C-11 11 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 367 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & CONCOURSE AVENUE (INT ID 977) WHITTIER BLVD. PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A JOIN JOIN JOIN JOIN
JOIN NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CONCOURSE AVE. INT ID 977, RAMP ID 2926 WHITTIER BLVD.

CONCOURSE AVENUE WHITTIER BLVD.

CONCOURSE AVENUE NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CONCOURSE AVE. INT ID 977, RAMP ID 2925 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CONCOURSE AVE. INT ID 977, RAMP ID 2924 C-12 12 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE: JOIN

Page 368 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & WILCOX AVE. (INT ID 899) PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-13 13 WHITTIER BLVD. SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & WILCOX AVENUE INT ID 899, RAMP ID 2915 WHITTIER BLVD. SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & WILCOX AVENUE INT ID 899, RAMP ID ? NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & WILCOX AVENUE INT ID 899, RAMP ID 2917 WHITTIER BLVD. NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & WILCOX AVENUE INT ID 899, RAMP ID 2916

WILCOX AVENUE
WILCOX AVENUE WHITTIER BLVD. LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 369 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & 22ND STREET (INT ID 981) WHITTIER BLVD. 22ND STREET PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com M. A. LUZANILLA CIV I L M. A. LUZANILLA Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 22ND STREET INT ID 981, RAMP ID 2914 WHITTIER BLVD. C-14 14 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 22ND STREET INT ID 981, RAMP ID 2912 22ND STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 370 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & 21ST STREET (INT ID 1013) PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-15 15 NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 21ST STREET INT ID 1013, RAMP ID 2906, 2907 WHITTIER BLVD. 21ST STREET NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 21ST STREET INT ID 1013, RAMP ID 2908, 2909 WHITTIER BLVD. 21ST STREET SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 21ST STREET INT ID 1013, RAMP ID 2911 WHITTIER BLVD. SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 21ST STREET INT ID 1013, RAMP ID 2910 WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER BLVD. LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 371 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & 20TH STREET (INT ID 1015) PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-16 16 NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 20TH STREET INT ID 1015, RAMP ID 1494 WHITTIER BLVD. NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 20TH STREET INT ID 1015, RAMP ID 1493 WHITTIER BLVD. LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:
20TH STREET
20TH STREET

Page 372 of 840 ends

ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BLVD. & 19TH STREET (INT ID 935) PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J. KWOK J. KWOK CIV I L Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A C-17 17 NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 19TH STREET INT ID 935, RAMP ID 1491 WHITTIER BLVD. 19TH STREET NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 19TH STREET INT ID 935, RAMP ID 1486 WHITTIER BLVD. 19TH STREET NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 19TH STREET INT ID 935, RAMP ID 1491 WHITTIER BLVD. 19TH STREET NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 19TH STREET INT ID 935, RAMP ID 1486WHITTIER BLVD. 19TH STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 373 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BLVD. ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR 18TH STREET & WHITTIER BOULEVARD (INT ID 905) WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER BLVD. NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 18TH STREET INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1485 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 18TH STREET INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1485 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 18TH STREET INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1484 18TH STREET WHITTIER BLVD. SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 18TH STREET INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1483 C-18 18 18TH STREET
18TH STREET
18TH STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 374 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BLVD. ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & VAIL AVENUE (INT ID 154) NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VAIL AVENUE INT ID 154, RAMP ID 1477 C-19 19 VAIL AVENUE WHITTIER BLVD. NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VAIL AVENUE INT ID 154, RAMP ID 1474 VAIL AVENUE SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VAIL AVENUE INT ID 154, RAMP ID 1476 VAIL AVENUE WHITTIER BLVD. SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & VAIL AVENUE INT ID 154, RAMP ID 1475

VAIL AVENUE
VAIL AVENUEWHITTIER BLVD. LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 375 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BLVD.

CALIFORNIA AVENUE ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & CALIFORNIA AVENUE (INT ID 997) WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER BLVD. NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CALIFORNIA AVE. INT ID 997, RAMP ID 1473 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CALIFORNIA AVE. INT ID 997, RAMP ID 1470 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CALIFORNIA AVE. INT ID 997, RAMP ID 1472 WHITTIER BLVD. SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & CALIFORNIA AVE. INT ID 997, RAMP ID 1471 C-20 20 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 376 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.J. MUNGUIA LOPEZ CIV I L J.J. MUNGUIA LOPEZ Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N MAPLE AVENUE (INT ID 302) NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & MAPLE AVE. INT ID 302, RAMP ID 1465 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & MAPLE AVE. INT ID 302, RAMP ID 1466

N MAPLE AVENUE
N MAPLE AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & MAPLE AVE. INT ID 302, RAMP ID 1463 N MAPLE AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & MAPLE AVE. INT ID 302, RAMP ID 1464 N MAPLE AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD C-21 21 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 377 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N PARK AVENUE (INT ID 99)

N PARK AVENUE
N PARK AVENUE C-22 22
N PARK AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & PARK AVE. INT ID 99, RAMP ID 1456 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & PARK AVE. INT ID 99, RAMP ID 1457 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & PARK AVE. INT ID 99, RAMP ID 1458 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & PARK AVE. INT ID 99, RAMP ID 1459 N PARK AVENUE LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 378 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N TAYLOR AVENUE (INT ID 12) N TAYLOR AVENUE C-23 23 WHITTIER BOULEVARD

N TAYLOR AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD
N TAYLOR AVENUE NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & TAYLOR AVE. INT ID 12, RAMP ID 1414 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & TAYLOR AVE. INT ID 12, RAMP ID 1415 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & TAYLOR AVE. SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & TAYLOR AVE. INT ID 12, RAMP ID 1412 INT ID 12, RAMP ID 1413 WHITTIER BOULEVARD
N TAYLOR AVENUE LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 379 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N 12TH STREET (INT ID 84) N 12TH STREET C-24 24 WHITTIER BOULEVARD
N 12TH STREET NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 12TH ST. INT ID 84, RAMP ID 1437 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 12TH ST. INT ID 84, RAMP ID 1438 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 380 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N GREENWOOD AVENUE (INT ID 210) N GREENWOOD AVENUE N GREENWOOD AVENUE C-25 25 WHITTIER BOULEVARD N GREENWOOD AVENUE WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & GREENWOOD AVE. INT ID 210, RAMP ID 1436 NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & GREENWOOD AVE. INT ID 210, RAMP ID 1433 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & GREENWOOD AVE. INT ID 210, RAMP ID 1434 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & GREENWOOD AVE. INT ID 210, RAMP ID 1435 N GREENWOOD AVENUE LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 381 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N 10TH STREET (INT ID 905) C-26 26 WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD N 10TH STREET
N 10TH STREET
N 10TH STREET
N 10TH STREET NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 10TH ST. INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1442 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 10TH ST. INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1443,1444 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 10TH ST. INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1441 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 10TH ST. INT ID 905, RAMP ID 1445LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 382 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.A. OCANA T. CIV I L J.A. OCANA T. Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & SPRUCE STREET (INT ID 939) SPRUCE STREET C-27 27 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & SPRUCE ST. INT ID 939, RAMP ID 952 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & SPRUCE ST. INT ID 939, RAMP ID 951 SPRUCE STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & SPRUCE ST. INT ID 939, RAMP ID 953 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & SPRUCE ST. INT ID 939, RAMP ID 954 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 383 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & 7TH STREET (INT ID 489) 7TH STREET C-28 28 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 7TH ST. INT ID 489, RAMP ID 935, 936 WHITTIER BOULEVARD SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 7TH ST. INT ID 489, RAMP ID 934 WHITTIER BOULEVARD LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:
7TH STREET

Page 384 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & 5TH STREET (INT ID 923) 5TH STREET C-29 29 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 5TH ST. INT ID 923, RAMP ID 985 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 5TH ST. INT ID 923, RAMP ID 986 WHITTIER BOULEVARD SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 5TH ST. INT ID 923, RAMP ID 984 WHITTIER BOULEVARD SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 5TH ST. INT ID 923, RAMP ID 9875TH STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 385 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & 4TH STREET (INT ID 931) 4TH STREET C-30 30 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 4TH ST. INT ID 931, RAMP ID 989 WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 4TH ST. INT ID 931, RAMP ID 990 WHITTIER BOULEVARD SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 4TH ST. INT ID 931, RAMP ID 988 WHITTIER BOULEVARD SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 4TH ST. INT ID 931, RAMP ID 9914TH STREET LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 386 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com M. A. LUZANILLA CIV I L M. A. LUZANILLA Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N 3RD STREET (INT ID 922) N 3RD STREET C-31 31 WHITTIER BOULEVARD
N 3RD STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 3RD ST. INT ID 922, RAMP ID 994 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 3RD ST. INT ID 922, RAMP ID 992 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 3RD ST. INT ID 922, RAMP ID 993 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

DRIVEWAY

Page 387 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.J. MUNGUIA LOPEZ CIV I L J.J. MUNGUIA LOPEZ Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N 2ND STREET (INT ID 904) N 2ND STREET C-32 32
N 2ND STREET WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 2ND ST. INT ID 904, RAMP ID 997 NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 2ND ST. INT ID 904, RAMP ID 996 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 2ND ST. INT ID 904, RAMP ID 995 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 388 of 840 ends

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO. 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 8/13/26 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com J.R. CHAVARIN CIV I L J.R. CHAVARIN Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A WHITTIER BOULEVARD ADA CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR E WHITTIER BOULEVARD & N 1ST STREET (INT ID 1016) N 1ST STREET C-33 33 WHITTIER BOULEVARD

BLUFF ROAD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER BOULEVARD N 1ST STREET NE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 1ST ST. INT ID 1016, RAMP ID 1000 NW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 1ST ST. INT ID 1016, RAMP ID 999 SE RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 1ST ST. INT ID 1016, RAMP ID 1001 SW RAMP - WHITTIER BLVD. & 1ST ST. INT ID 1016, RAMP ID 998 LEGEND: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PCC WORK AND OTHER RELATED WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES: REMOVALS PAVEMENT ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION BY OTHERS RRFB BANNER POLE NOTE:

Page 389 of 840 ends

C-34 34 SOLAR POWER RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON DETIALS SOLAR POWER RRFB WITH MAST ARM DETAILS W16-7P SIGN LEGEND W11-2 PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM WHITTIER BOULEVARD FROM VIA CLEMENTE STREET TO VAN NORMAN ROAD CIP NO.: 889 Bowman 34 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS A. FARAHANI 7/28/26 GENERAL RRFB NOTES: 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea, CA 92821 Tel: (714) 940-0100 bowman.com H. HABIBI CIV I L H. HABIBI Engineering Division MOHAMMAD JALAL I FARAHANNo. 54235 I Exp. 12/31/27 REGI STERED PROFESS IONAL ENGI NEER STATE OF CA L I FORN I A R10-25

Page 390 of 840 ends

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DRAWINGS
FOR

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM

WHITTIER BLVD
C.P. No. 889
GEORGINA TAMAYO – MAYOR
DANIELLE ROMERO – MAYOR PRO TEM
RIC ALONZO – COUNCILMEMBER
SCARLET PERALTA – COUNCILMEMBER
SALVADOR MELENDEZ – COUNCILMEMBER
RAUL ALVAREZ – CITY MANAGER
CESAR ROLDAN – DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
PREPARED BY:
3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250
Brea, CA 92821
Tel: 714-940-0100
Bowman Project No. 440178-01-001-00018
PROJECT SUBJECT TO PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT NO. 4202
Bid Opening (Electronic Bid through PlanetBids)
Wednesday, September 23, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Attachment B

Page 391 of 840 ends

ii

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM

WHITTIER BLVD
C.P. No. 889

IN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO

BID SCHEDULE
 Bid Period - August 27, 2026 – September 23, 2026
 RFIs due by September 10, 2026 at 12:00 PM
 City Reponses to RFIs due by September 17, 2026 at 5:00 PM  Bid Opening - September 23, 2026 at 11:00 AM
 Tentative Award of Contract - October 14, 2026 City Council Meeting  Commence Construction Project November 2026
 Complete Construction February 2027
 Close out Project April 2027
 Bid proposals will be received via PlanetBids
(https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839) until 11:00 A.M. on September 23, 2026.
o PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE RECEIVED IN PERSON
These Specifications have been prepared
under the direction of:
__________________________________
Amir Farahani, P.E.

Civil No. 54235

Page 392 of 840 ends

iii
TO PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS:

The City of Montebello invites you to become a prospective bidder on one of its public projects.

It is the City’s intention to provide you with thorough and complete information regarding this project and to present an accurate description of the necessary work so that you may successfully bid and construct the project.

Submittal of your bid assumes that you have made a thorough and complete investigation of the project site and that you have discovered no apparent discrepancies between the scope of work set forth in the plans and specifications and the actual field conditions.

If there are any questions regarding this project, please contact the City Public Works/Engineering office at (323) 887-1462.

Cesar Roldan
Director of Public Works

Page 393 of 840 ends

iv

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM

WHITTIER BLVD
C.P. No. 889

IN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO

TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS A-1 to A-3
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS B-1 to B-3
PROPOSAL C-1 to C-14
STANDARD PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT D-1 to D-6
SPECIAL PROVISIONS GP-1 to BD-60
PART 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS GP-3 to GP-43
PART 2 – BID ITEM DESCRIPTIONS BD-1 to BD-60
LIST OF STANDARD PLANS APPENDIX “A”
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (DIR) APPENDIX “B”

CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION NUMBER FORM
PROJECT SIGN APPENDIX “C”
PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT NO. 4202 APPENDIX “D”

Page 394 of 840 ends

A-1

NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS
FOR

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM

WHITTIER BLVD
C.P. No. 889

IN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Montebello as AGENCY, invites bids for the above stated project and will receive such bids Bid proposals will be received via PlanetBids (https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839) until 11:00 A.M. on September 23, 2026.
 PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE RECEIVED IN PERSON
SCOPE OF WORK: The work to be performed or executed under these specifications consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as required by the contract documents to construct the above stated project. It is the intent of this contract to have the contractor perform the “Project”, and other appurtenances in accordance with the latest Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction “Greenbook” and 2025 Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications unless otherwise shown.

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:

Copies of the contract documents and specifications are available through PlanetBids.

In order to be on the Planholder List for this project, each bidder must submit a Bidders Information Sheet through PlanetBids. Bids will not be accepted unless the bidder is on the Planholder List. All questions from plan holders must be sent through PlanetBids.

Questions: All questions related to this project shall be submitted electronically and received no later than 12:00 p.m. on September 10, 2026, prior to the opening of bids.

PREVAILING WAGE:

Pursuant to Section 1770, et seq., of the California Labor Code, the Contractor shall pay the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California for the locality where the work is to be performed. A copy of said wage rates is available on-line at: B-2 www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

The Contractor and any subcontractors shall pay not less than said specified rates and shall post a copy of said wage rates at the project site.

LABOR COMPLIANCE:

To comply with SB 854, beginning January 1, 2015 the following applies:

1. No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial

Page 395 of 840 ends

A-2
Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

2. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public works on a public works project awarded on or after April 1, 2015, unless registered with the DIR.

3. The project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.

4. Require the prime contractor to post job site notices prescribed by regulation (See 8 Calif.

Code Reg. §16451(d) for the notice that previously was required for projects monitored by the CMU) or the City must post the notices itself.

The Contractor shall fill in the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Contractor Registration Number Form provided in Appendix “B” and submit it with the sealed Bid.

The AGENCY hereby affirmatively ensures that minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this notice and will not be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, marital status or religion in any consideration leading to the award of contract.

In entering into a public works contract, or subcontract, to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to a public works contract, the Contractor, or the Subcontractors, offers and agrees to assign to the awarding body all rights, title and interest in, and to, all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Section 15) of under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public work contract or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective as the time the awarding body tenders final payment to the Contractor, without further acknowledgement by the parties.

Bids must be prepared on the approved Proposal forms in conformance with the “Instructions to Bidders” and submitted in a sealed envelope plainly marked on the outside. The bid must be accompanied by certified or cashier’s check, or bidder’s bond, made payable to the AGENCY for an amount no less than ten percent of the amount bid.

Bidders must hold a valid California Class A Contractor’s License.

No bid will be accepted from a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with provisions of the Business and Professions Code. The successful Contractor and his subcontractors will be required to possess business licenses from the City.

The AGENCY will deduct five percent (5%) retention from all progress payments as specified in Section 7-3.2 of these Specifications. The Contractor may substitute an escrow holder surety of equal value to the retention and the Contractor shall be beneficial owner of the surety and shall receive any interest thereon.

The AGENCY reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularity and to take all bids, under advisement for a period of sixty (60) days.

Page 396 of 840 ends

A-3
The contract period for this project is one-hundred twenty (120) working days from the effective date of the Notice-to-Proceed to be issued by the City.

BY ORDER OF: The City of Montebello, California
_____________________________
Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk

Page 397 of 840 ends

B-1

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
FOR

PAVING THE WAY PROGRAM

WHITTIER BLVD
C.P. No. 889

IN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO

GENERAL INFORMATION
ELECTRONIC proposals, including all documents required to be submitted with the bid, will be received at the office of the Montebello City Clerk of said City until the date and time specified in the legal notice or addendum to the project documents, whichever occurs latest, for the construction of work described in the project documents or said legal notice. The ELECTRONIC Bid(s) will be evaluated and posted on PlanetBids, where they can be viewed publicly shortly after the bid closes.

ONLY ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS ARE ACCEPTED.

In addition to the “ELECTRONIC” uploading of Proposal Documents described in the ‘INVITATION TO BIDDERS’, the fully executed original Bid Bond shall be delivered to the Montebello City Clerk on or before the actual bid opening day and time.

This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a Public Works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a Public Works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

PROPOSAL FORMS
Bids shall be submitted directly through PlanetBids
(https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839) and contractors must use the Proposal forms provided by the AGENCY (contained within these contract specifications). All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. The AGENCY will not consider any proposal not meeting these requirements.
 PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE RECEIVED IN PERSON

Page 398 of 840 ends
← All documents from this meeting