Monterey City Council
May 16, 2023

Council Chamber
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, California
City Council Agenda
Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, May 16, 2023
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
City Council
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Kim Barber, Councilmember,
District 1
Gino Garcia, Councilmember
Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember,
District 2
City Manager
Hans Uslar
How to participate in this meeting:
 Written comment: Members of the public may submit comment(s) to [email protected] until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These messages are not read aloud during the meeting but are made available to the meeting body and public at https://monterey.org/submitted-comments. All comments received become part of the record.
 In-Person: Please see the meeting location listed above. Wearing a mask is recommended and encouraged.
 Remote via ZoomGov Webinar:
o Join on a computer or smartphone: https://montereyorg.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 An up-to-date version of the Zoom software must be used.
o Or join by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (Campbell, CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another. o Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 #
o If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
 To “raise your hand,” dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute o Need help using or updating Zoom? Read our Zoom Meeting Instructions (PDF)  This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90-second delay). *** Evening Session Agenda ***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognition of Monterey County Health Department, Elsa Mendoza Jimenez, and Edward Moreno, M.D.; Montage Health, Steven Packer, M.D., and Martha Blum, M.D.; and the Monterey County Department of Emergency Management, Former County Administrative Officer Charles McKee, Assistant County Administrative Officer Nick Chiulos and Emergency Management Director Kelsey Scanlon for their Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061) 5/16/2023 7:00:00 PM
2 PUBLIC COMMENTS (MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA)
PUBLIC COMMENTS allows you, the public, to speak for a maximum of three minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey City Council and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the City Council may do so by addressing the Council during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to: City Clerk, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. The appropriate staff person will contact the sender concerning the details. NOTE: For regular meetings with an afternoon and evening session, Public Comments are taken during both sessions. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.

CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT AGENDA consists of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the public or a Councilmember may request that an item be placed on the regular agenda for further discussion.

Approval of Minutes

2. May 2, 2023 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Ordinances
ORDINANCES are legislative acts by the Council, are the most permanent and binding type of Council action as they modify the City Code, and may be replaced only by a subsequent ordinance. An ordinance requires legal advertisement when introduced, and two readings at separate Council meetings. An ordinance is considered "passed to print" when approved for a second reading, and is "passed and adopted" when given final approval by the Council.

3. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Implementing Financial Hardship Fee Waivers for Appeals and Updating the Administrative Citation Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver Eligibility Criteria (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

4. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Flavored Tobacco Ordinance (Chapter 19, Article 5 of the Monterey City Code) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

5. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 “Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units” and Amending Section 38-11 “Definitions” (Statutorily Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17)
Resolutions
RESOLUTIONS are passed to express the policy of the Council on certain items or programs, or are passed to direct certain types of administrative action. A resolution may be changed by adoption of a subsequent resolution. Resolutions only require one reading and are approved when "passed and adopted."

6. Identify the Rehabilitation of Monroe Street as the Project to be Funded by SB 1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) 5/16/2023 7:00:00 PM
3 7. Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Master Programs Funding Agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County to Receive Allocations from Regional Surface Transportation Program, Regional Development Impact Fee, and Transportation Development Act 2% Program, Amend Resolution 22-135 to include the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project, and Authorize an Increase of FY23 Revenue and Appropriation of Regional Surface Transportation Funds in the Amount of $208,940.31 ***CIP*** (Mitigated Negative Declaration Previously Approved)

8. Receive Calle Principal Street Maintenance District 00-1 Engineer's Report; Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment; and Set Time for Public Hearing (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

9. Receive Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 Engineer's Report; Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment; and Set Time for Public Hearing (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

10. Amending and Restating Resolution 23-004, the Salary Schedule, to Add a FullTime Police Recruit Position (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Other

11. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 1187 Del Monte Avenue (Mohr Imports); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Adam Mohr (Mohr Imported Cars, Inc.); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

12. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 290 Figueroa Street (Dust Bowl Brewing Co. Tap Depot); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Brett Honore and Brett Tate (Dust Bowl Brewing Co., LLC); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

13. Receive Mayor’s Recommendations and Make Appointments to the Architectural Review Committee, Building and Housing Appeals Board, Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee, and Planning Commission (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)

14. Approve a Letter Urging the State Legislature to Take Action to Address the Fentanyl Crisis (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
*** End of Consent Agenda ***
5/16/2023 7:00:00 PM
4 PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on non-routine issues that might stimulate public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Mayor. The Council may limit the time each speaker is allocated.

15. Receive Report About the Final Administrative Draft Compatible Use Study (Exempt from CEQA Article 18, Section 15262)

PUBLIC HEARING (EVE)
PUBLIC HEARINGS are held to receive public comment on certain items pending Council action. You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Mayor. The Council may limit the time allocated to each speaker. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the close of the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009(b).)

16. Consider the Planning Commission’s Recommendation to Approve 912 Del Monte Center Text Amendment Application TM-22-0217 to Amend the Del Monte Center SC Plan Land Use Regulations to Modify Permitted Uses at the Shopping Center ; Applicant Sarah Cuban, Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP; Owner American Assets Trust; C-2-SC Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Designation (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification or make a brief announcement or make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter (G.C. 54954.2).

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
The City Manager may make a brief report on his activities or a brief announcement. He may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.
*** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** Council will adjourn to closed session no later than 10:30 p.m.

ADJOURNMENT
Members of the public have the right to address the City Council on any item on the Agenda, before or during its consideration [G.C. §54954.3(a)]. The Mayor will formally open the floor for public comment on items such as "Public Appearance" and "Public Hearings." Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.org/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours.

Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided for this purpose. 5/16/2023 7:00:00 PM
5 City Council Meetings are cable cast live and recorded for replay on Monterey's Government Access Channel 25 by Access Media Productions (AMP).

CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:

Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
Fax: (831) 646-3793
Email: [email protected]
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings. Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance. Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or (831) 646-3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-

35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communicationrelated assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

Upcoming city meetings are listed at http://isearchmonterey.org More information is available by calling (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Recognition of Monterey County Health Department, Elsa Mendoza Jimenez, and Edward Moreno, M.D.; Montage Health, Steven Packer, M.D., and Martha Blum, M.D.; and the Monterey County Department of Emergency Management, Former County Administrative Officer Charles McKee, Assistant County Administrative Officer Nick Chiulos and Emergency Management Director Kelsey Scanlon for their Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council present proclamations to the Monterey County Health Department, Elsa Mendoza Jimenez, and Edward Moreno, M.D.; Montage Health, Steven Packer, M.D., and Martha Blum, M.D.; and the Monterey County Department of Emergency Management, Former County Administrative Officer Charles McKee, Assistant County Administrative Officer Nick Chiulos, and Emergency Management Director Kelsey Scanlon for their Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in recognition of their work and dedication on behalf of the residents of Monterey County during the COVID-19 pandemic.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is within the City Council’s purview to recognize community partners whose efforts benefit the health, safety, and quality of life of all who live, work, and visit in the City of Monterey.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On March 3, 2020, the City Council appropriated $35,000 to prepare and respond to COVID-19.

Since March 2020, the City has incurred $3,093,664 in COVID-19 related expenses, $339,846 of which have been reimbursed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In addition, the City experienced approximately $32 million in revenue loss due to the pandemic and is still recovering financially from the effects of the pandemic. Recognizing community partners and public health officials has no fiscal impact to the City.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

None.

DISCUSSION:

A brief oral report and proclamations will be acknowledged at the meeting, recognizing the outstanding efforts on behalf of the Monterey community that were made during the COVID-19 pandemic by the Monterey County Health Department, Montage Health, and the Monterey County Department of Emergency Management.

As of February 2023, when the City of Monterey terminated the local COVID-19 emergency, Monterey County has experienced 99,117 confirmed cases of COVID-19, resulting in 821 confirmed deaths since March 2020.

The City of Monterey and its public health and emergency management partners, including the County of Monterey’s Health and Emergency Management departments, and regional healthcare provider Montage Health, have been leaders in the region in protecting the public during the pandemic.

The Monterey County Health Department, under the leadership of Health Services Director Elsa Mendoza Jimenez, MPH, Health Officer and Bureau Chief Edward Moreno, M.D., responded to cruise ship concerns early in the pandemic, implemented critical health orders, monitored COVID-19 activity, coordinated the implementation of testing sites and vaccine clinics and worked to reduce infections and the loss of life during the global pandemic. The Monterey County Health Department also partnered with the Monterey Fire Department to offer vaccine clinics to vulnerable populations and the community at large.

Montage Health, under the leadership of President/CEO Steven Packer, M.D. and Medical Director of Infection Prevention Martha Blum, M.D., provided guidance and medical advice to residents of the Monterey Peninsula on COVID-19 prevention, treatment, vaccinations, and testing, prepared for and provided reassurance to the community about emergency department and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) surge capacity for the Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula.

The Monterey County’s Department of Emergency Management (formerly Office of Emergency Services) also provided sound leadership during the local emergency. Under the leadership of former County Administrative Officer Charles McKee, Assistant County Administrative Officer Nick Chiulos and Emergency Management Director Kelsey Scanlon, the Department of Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 7 Emergency Management served as lead agency coordinating efforts with the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), led the Operational Area (OA) coordination meetings, and assisted the City of Monterey to secure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for our Fire, Police, Public Works, and Emergency Services personnel, portable restrooms at El Estero Park, and handwashing stations at various locations throughout the community.

CBK/NR
Attachments: 1. Proclamation
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 8 Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 9 Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 5, Packet Page 10 Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 6, Packet Page 11

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, May 2, 2023
4:00 PM 7:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBER

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Parks and Recreation Director, Finance Director, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Environmental Regulations Manager, Intern (City Manager's Office), Police Lieutenant, Principal Planner ***Afternoon Session Agenda ***

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll and explained to the public how to participate in the meeting virtually.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA)
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from: Tom Rowley, Bob Faulis, Steve Lightfoot, unidentified staff members from the Monterey Museum of Art, Lorna Moffat, Jody Emerson, and Nina Beety.

CONSENT ITEMS
The Mayor and Council stated that they would pull Items 3 and 5 from Consent. Public comment on the Consent Items was not received. Mayor Williamson introduced the ordinance agendized as Item 4 by reading its full title.

On a motion by , seconded by , and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the CONSENT ITEMS except Items 3 and 5 (****LISTEN: who moved and seconded?) AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Approval of Minutes

1. April 18, 2023 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved

2. April 26, 2023 Special Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved
Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
2 Ordinances

3. 1st Reading by Title Only of an Ordinance Implementing Financial Hardship Fee Waivers for Appeals and Updating the Administrative Citation Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver Eligibility Criteria (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Pulled from Consent; Passed ordinance to print
City Attorney Davi gave a brief verbal presentation.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Haffa, to pass to print the Ordinance Implementing Financial Hardship Fee Waivers for Appeals and Updating the Administrative Citation Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver Eligibility Criteria.

Public comment was received from Lorna Moffat and Nina Beety, who expressed concern about the income levels and qualifications required for fee waivers.

The Council explained that the fee waiver was designed to assist residents who are unable to pay the full cost of filing an appeal. It was stated that it would be appropriate for the City to receive full cost recovery for staff processes associated with appeals. It was stated that the Council has a responsibility to taxpayers to be sure that fees are fair.

The motion carried by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

4. 1st Reading by Title Only to Amend the Flavored Tobacco Ordinance (Chapter 19, Article 5 of the Monterey City Code) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Introduced by title only, waived full reading, and passed ordinance to print Resolutions

5. Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Funding Agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board to Accept a State Budget Allocation in the Amount of $1,000,000, Authorize and Designate a Representative for the Lake El Estero Diversion to Sanitary Sewer Project, and Authorize an Increase of FY23 Revenue in the CIP-State Funding Source Fund and Appropriation to the Urban Stormwater Diversion Project (CIP2310) in the Capital Projects Fund ***CIP*** (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) Action: Pulled from consent; Adopted Resolution No. 23-048 C.S.

Environmental Regulations Manager Wotan gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from Jody Emerson, who asked questions about logistics in future years of water storage in the lake. On question from the public, Environmental Regulations Manager Wotan explained that the City's goal is for Lake El Estero to remain natural.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 13 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
3 The Council discussed the matter. It was stressed that the City should receive direct benefit from the results of the project, and that the increased water allocation could help the City to accomplish the housing required by the Regional Housing Needs Analysis ("RHNA"). The potential was discussed to allocate more funding sooner in order to expedite the project and any resulting water allocations. It was suggested that the City look at options for additional projects, and to continue the conversation to see if this project could result in direct water credits for City projects.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following roll-call vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-048 C.S. Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Funding Agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board to Accept a State Budget Allocation in the Amount of $1,000,000, Authorizing and Designatomg a Representative for the Lake El Estero Diversion to Sanitary Sewer Project, and Authorizing an Increase of FY23 Revenue in the CIP-State Funding Source Fund and Appropriation to the Urban Stormwater Diversion Project (CIP2310) in the Capital Projects Fund ***CIP***:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
*** End of Consent Agenda ***
*** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** Public comment on the closed session was not received. The Council adjourned to closed session at 5:37 p.m.

RECESS
The Council recessed at 6:40 p.m.

RECONVENE
The Council reconvened at 7:01 p.m.
*** Evening Session Agenda ***

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Smith led the Pledge.

CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS (MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA)
Continued public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Tom Gowing, Richard Ruccello, and Esther Malkin.

ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Clerk Klein announced:

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
4 1. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1):

1. City of Monterey v. Marianne McNicol (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001205)

2. Lynne Denley v. City of Monterey, et. al (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000133)

3. Clara Gilliland v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV003170

4. Francisca Moralez v. City of Monterey et al. (United States District Court Norther District of California Case No. 22-CV-07540)

5. Yessenia Garcia Reveles, et al. v. City of Monterey et al (Monterey County Superior Court Case Nos. 22CV003162 and 22CV000736)

6. Richard Rosendale v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000879)

7. Pacific Western Bank v. City and Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2212212)

8. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v. City of Monterey (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV329015; Sixth District Court of Appeal Case No. H050157)

9. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v City of Monterey (Riverside County Superior Court Case No.

CVR12103427; Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 2, Case No. E080304)

10. Cynthia Wills v. City of Monterey (United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division Case No. 21-CV-01998 EMC)

11. Sichel Young v. City of Monterey, et al (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 22CV002243)
(Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to its legal counsel on the matter of Sichel Young v. City of Monterey, et al.

PUBLIC HEARING (EVE)

6. Resolution Adopting Findings and Overruling the Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission’s Consistency Determination for the Draft Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 “Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units” and Amending Section 38-11 “Definitions” and 1st Reading by Title Only of an Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 “Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units” and Amending Section 38-11 “Definitions” (Statutorily Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 23-049 C.S.; Introduced by title only, waived full reading, and passed to print the draft ordinance
Mayor Williamson introduced the ordinance by reading its full title. Principal Planner Roveri gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions together with Community Development Director Cole and City Attorney Davi. Fiona Jensen, Associate Planner with the Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC"), verbally presented to the Council the ALUC's position on the matter, disagreeing with the City's stance and recommending that Accessory Dwelling Units ("ADUs") be limited to 850 sq. ft. in the areas of concern, citing risk of airplane crashes and stating that the City would be liable for any safety issues resulting from Council's decision.

On question from the Council, City Attorney Davi confirmed that the Airport would not be held liable if the City overturns their consistency determination. The Council noted that the areas of the City in question were significant. On question from the Council, City Attorney Davi read aloud sections of the California Government Code relating to size limitations and local regulation of ADUs, and advised that the Council weigh the potential risks of various public safety emergencies with the big picture of the Council's expressed priority to develop housing.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
5 Public comment was received from Esther Malkin, who said that her side of the City took the brunt of airport safety concerns.

The Council discussed the matter. Comments made in favor of the staff recommendation included stating that building a larger unit would provide an owner a greater return on their investment, and that the difference between 850 sq. ft. and 1,000 sq. ft. would not introduce a greater risk to public health and safety. Equity was cited by stating that limiting ADU size in the affected neighborhoods, and not elsewhere in the City, would be a considerable limitation of the rights of property owners adjacent to the airport and in North Monterey. It was stated that the City would need to be mindful of risks and mitigations in advantaged and disadvantaged parts of town.

On question, Community Development Director Cole spoke about privacy and noise impacts and height/setback limitations on ADUs.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Haffa, and seconded by Councilmember Smith, to adopt Resolution No. 23-049 C.S. Adopting Findings and Overruling the Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission’s Consistency Determination for the Draft Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 “Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units" and Amending Section 38-11 "Definitions," and passed to print the ordinance amending Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 "Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units" and Amending Section 38-11 "Definitions." The Council made a few closing remarks. It was stated that if the City changed zoning to 850sq ft for ADUs it would be treating property owners in the affected neighborhoods less graciously than those in the rest of the City, and reducing the potential property value of their properties.

The Council stated that they respected their neighbors the ALUC, and that the Council was tasked to craft policy for the community of Monterey that preserves precious available resources.

The motion carried by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)

7. Approve Project Description for Cannabis Businesses so that the Community Development Department can Start Environmental Review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Directed staff to bring back to the Council a revised project description with a fourth retail location at North Fremont between Airport Road and the Travelodge, and up to five cannabis-related events at the Fairgrounds (4-1, Councilmember Smith voting no) Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira gave the staff presentation, recommending that the Council approve the project description as follows:
(1) Allow three storefront cannabis retail stores (adult use and/or medicinal), one each in Downtown (except fronting Alvarado Street), Lighthouse Avenue Business District, and the Cannery Row Business District (except fronting Cannery Row itself). Storefront Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 5, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
6 retailers are also authorized to deliver cannabis. A cannabis overlay zone is proposed for this purpose. The Community Development Department will issue a zone clearance on a first-come, first-served basis in the Lighthouse Avenue, Cannery Row, and Downtown business districts once the three cannabis retailers have been selected. The city will notify any remaining applicants when a zone is no longer available, until all three zones have one storefront retail cannabis business permittee. (2) Allow one non-storefront retail store (closed to the public/delivery only) of medicinal cannabis in any cannabis overlay zone location.
(3) Allow an unlimited number of cannabis testing laboratories in the city’s I-R – Industrial, Administration and Research districts.
(4) Authorize cannabis distributors to deliver cannabis to retailers and testing laboratories in the city without a city regulatory permit. (5) Authorize out-of-city delivery businesses to deliver in the city with a Cannabis Business License Tax certificate.

No cannabis business may be located within a 600-foot (600’) radius measured from property line to property line of a school, day care center, or youth center that is in existence at the time of issuance of a commercial cannabis permit. This prohibition shall not apply to any subsequent renewal of a commercial cannabis permit at the same location.

Together, Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira, City Attorney Davi, and Community Development Director Cole answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Wendy Brickman, who spoke in favor of allowing cannabis retail in the North Fremont Business District; Esther Malkin, who spoke in support of allowing a cannabis lounge or cafe in the North Fremont Business District; Amy Sheehan, who spoke in favor of allowing cannabis-related events; Eloise Shim, who expressed concern about crime and violence; Richard Ruccello, who stressed that North Fremont neighbors do not want cannabis businesses adjacent to their residences; and Anthony Gonzales, who echoed support for a cannabis lounge and making cannabis accessible in a safe way. During public comment Councilmember Smith left the Chamber at 8:51 p.m. and returned at 8:53 p.m.

The Council discussed the matter. It was suggested that the City could implement retail shops without an increase in crime, and that more information would be needed for a discussion about lounges or cafes. It was suggested to look at areas on North Fremont, not adjacent to residential property, for a fourth cannabis retail location, and to further discuss the option to allow cannabis-related events.

Dissenting opinion was expressed by Council, stating that retail cannabis should not be allowed by the City, and that the potential revenue would not be worth the effort and risk that would be involved.

Addressing health and safety concerns, it was stated by Council that it would be beneficial to provide safe ways for people to access cannabis. Regarding a cannabis lounge, it was stated that additional information would be needed. Regarding North Fremont, it was stated that it would be fair to capture the market to keep consumers spending in the City of Monterey and offering economic opportunity in that part of town. It was suggested that the non-storefront retail store be allowed to sell recreational and medicinal cannabis, not just medicinal cannabis.

Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira stated that adding a fourth retail location in the North Fremont area could be incorporated. He said that cannabis-related events would require further work, citing neighborhood impacts resulting from existing Fairgrounds events. On question from Council, City Attorney Davi responded to the idea of including lounges and events in the project Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 6, Packet Page 17 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
7 description, and said that it would take staff time to research it because it is unregulated by the State.

The City Council expressed, on consensus, its interest in adding to the project description a fourth dispensary on North Fremont as long as it is not adjacent to residential; the appropriate area was defined as from Airport Road to the Travelodge at 2030 N. Fremont Street. Support was expressed for starting small and learning lessons before adding more components to the cannabis retail program. Concern was expressed that adding events would be moving too fast for the community.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council directed staff to bring back to the Council a revised project description with a fourth retail cannabis location at North Fremont between Airport Road and the Travelodge, and up to five cannabis-related events at the Fairgrounds:

AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Williamson NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Haffa reported on a recent Community Human Services (CHS) meeting, at which he said the budget was approved, including funding that the City had allocated for the Casa de Noche Buena shelter for women and children in Seaside, the new Shuman HeartHouse shelter in Monterey, and the Safe Place for youth. He said that CHS appreciates the City’s support very much. He shared details from a bicycle accident that he experienced, and stressed the importance of safe bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

Mayor Williamson spoke about the ongoing decision pending with the Airport District regarding the Monterey Fire Department contract. He said a huge effort had been made by Monterey Fire union members. He encouraged people to speak at the Airport District meeting on May 3, 2023 to support the City’s contract.

Councilmember Smith recognized the anniversary of Seal Team Six’s mission to eliminate Osama bin Laden. He congratulated Big Sur marathon participants and winners.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira said that the City had a current survey seeking feedback on recreation services for North Monterey, including Montecito Park and Casanova Oak Knoll Park Center, and announced related upcoming events including a charette and a community event. He announced that Colton Hall hours would be expanding in May and June. He said that the Library’s summer reading program would be kicking off with the theme "Find Your Voice." He spoke about the Monterey Fire Department contract with the Airport, stating that City staff was cautiously optimistic for a positive outcome the next day at the district meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 10:06 p.m.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 7, Packet Page 18 City Council Minutes May 2, 2023
8 Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 2., Item Page 8, Packet Page 19 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY

IMPLEMENTING FINANCIAL HARDSHIP FEE WAIVERS FOR APPEALS AND UPDATING

THE ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION ADVANCE DEPOSIT HARDSHIP WAIVER ELIGIBILITY

CRITERIA
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, the City Council proposed a new policy to waive fees for appeals in the Community Development Department, Planning Division, and for appeals before the Appeals Hearing Board, Building and Housing Appeals Board, and the Disabled Access Appeals Board, based on the appellant’s financial inability to pay the fee; WHEREAS, in March 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3612 to implement specific criteria to aid staff in objectively determining whether an advance deposit hardship waiver should be granted to a person requesting to challenge an administrative citation. The waiver criteria adopted was borrowed from the formula used by California courts to waive court fees and costs due to a person’s financial condition, and from the California Vehicle Code which authorizes indigent persons to request an administrative hearing to review parking violations without payment of the parking penalty. (Vehicle Code sections 40215, 40220(c)(1), Government Code section 68632.) The eligible public benefits have expanded, and the determination of poverty level income has changed since the adoption of the criteria in 2020 and it needs to be updated;
WHEREAS, the City does not intend to waive fees or advance deposit requirements for any person who owns or has an interest in real property in Monterey County; WHEREAS, the City Council intends to update and expand the existing waiver policy to encourage low-income people to fully exercise their rights under the law; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 20 2 SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 19-103(e) is hereby added to read as follows:
(e) Appeal Fee Waivers.
(1) Notwithstanding the percentage of costs reasonably borne set forth in Subsection (a), any person who intends to file an appeal, the cost for which is to be recovered under Subsection (a)(I)(11.) Development Services, Appeals; or Subsection (a)(VI)(27.) Administrative Services, Appeals staffed by City Attorney’s Office, and who is financially unable to pay the fee as required by the Master Fee Schedule, may file a request for a Fee Waiver which shall include an affidavit as described in subsection (e)(3) below.
(2) The request shall be filed with the Finance Department on a Fee Waiver Application form, available from the Finance Department, on or before the deadline to file the appeal. Submission of a fee waiver application does not extend the deadline to file an appeal under City Code section 38-207 for Community Development Department appeals or any applicable deadline to appeal to the Appeals Hearing Board, the Building and Housing Appeals Board, or the Disabled Access Appeals Board. Failure to submit either a Fee Waiver Application form or the appeal fee on or before the deadline to file the appeal shall mean that the appeal is untimely.
(3) The City may waive the appeal fee if, in advance of the deadline to file the appeal, the appellant submits to the City a Fee Waiver Application form, signed under penalty of perjury, together with any supporting documents or materials, demonstrating the person’s actual financial inability to pay the fee. (4) An application for the advance deposit hardship waiver shall be granted under any of the following criteria:
(i) The applicant is receiving public benefits under one or more of the following programs:
(1) Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and State
Supplementary Payment (SSP).
(2) California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act (CalWORKs) or a federal Tribal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (Tribal TANF) grant program.
(3) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or the
California Food Assistance Program.
(4) County Relief, General Relief (GR), or General Assistance (GA).

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 21 (5) Cash Assistance Program for Aged, Blind, and Disabled Legal Immigrants (CAPI).
(6) In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS).
(7) Medi-Cal.
(8) California Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC Program).
(9) Unemployment compensation.
(ii) The applicant’s monthly income is two hundred (200) percent or less of the current poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. (iii) An applicant does not have enough income to pay for household basic needs and the advance deposit. This is verified through additional documentation regarding the person’s income, household income, money, and monthly deductions and expenses.
(5) An applicant that owns or has an interest in real property in Monterey County is ineligible for a waiver under this subsection. (6) If the City decides to deny the advance deposit hardship waiver application, a written determination listing the reasons for said denial shall be issued. The written determination to deny the waiver shall be final. (6) The written determination of the City’s denial of the advance deposit hardship waiver shall be served by mail upon the person who applied for the waiver.

SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 1-9.55(C)(2)(a) is hereby amended to add after (7) Medi-Cal, the following:
(8) California Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC Program).
(9) Unemployment compensation.

SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 1-9.55(C)(2)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(b) The applicant’s monthly income is two hundred (200) percent or less of the current poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.

SECTION 6: Monterey City Code, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 1-9.55(F) is hereby recodified as Subsection (G) and a new subsection (F) is added to read as follows:
(F) An applicant that owns or has an interest in real property in Monterey County is ineligible for a waiver under this subsection.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 22 4 SECTION 7: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 8: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on July 1, 2023, to be coterminous with the effective date of the Master Fee Schedule adopted by Resolution 23-036.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 23 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
AMEND THE FLAVORED TOBACCO ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 19, ARTICLE 5 OF THE

MONTEREY CITY CODE)
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, state law prohibits the sale or furnishing of cigarettes, tobacco products, and smoking paraphernalia to minors, as well as the purchase, receipt, or possession of tobacco products by minors (Cal. Pen. Code § 308);
WHEREAS, state law explicitly permits cities and counties to enact local tobacco retail permitting ordinances and allows for the suspension or revocation of a local permit for a violation of any state tobacco control law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22971.3); WHEREAS, in 2014 the Monterey City Council enacted Monterey City Code section 19- 105 et seq. to establish a permitting system for tobacco retailers to ensure that retailers comply with tobacco control laws and business standards of the City to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City;
WHEREAS, in 2022 the Monterey City Council prohibited the sale of all flavored tobacco products and single use electronic smoking products, exempting flavored shisha tobacco products sold at 220 Olivier Street, Monterey, for onsite use;
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 793, approved by the Governor in August 2020, prohibits a tobacco retailer from selling flavored tobacco products. Proposition 31, the Flavored Tobacco Products Referendum, was on the November 8, 2022 ballot. The ballot measure was approved by the voters, thus upholding the legislation. Therefore, SB 793 became effective in December 2022 pursuant to California Constitution, article 2, section 10; WHEREAS, Health & Safety Code section 104559.5(g) provides that the state law does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of local standards that impose greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by the state. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between the state law and local standards, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail; WHEREAS, in a ruling issued on March 18, 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al (9th Cir. 2022) 29 F.4th 542 held that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, codified at 21 USC §387 et seq., did not preempt a city from banning the sale of some or all tobacco products; WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to continue to exempt from its application the use of real property located at 220 Olivier Street, Monterey, as a location where flavored shisha tobacco products may be purchased and used on-site, so long as the retailer complies with Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 24 2 conditions for the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer set out under subsection (c) of California Health and Safety Code 104559.5, and this ordinance. This location has sold flavored shisha tobacco products for use at its on-site hookah lounge continuously since approximately 2007. Should this use discontinue for 90 days, it is the intent of this ordinance that the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products will be prohibited throughout the city;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2. Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 106 is amended to read as follows:
“For purposes of this article, the terms and definitions in Section 104559.5 of the California Health and Safety Code are incorporated herein, to the extent they are not inconsistent with the belowlisted definitions:
a. “Department” refers to any City department designated by the City Manager to administer and/or enforce the provisions of this article or, if so designated by the City Manager, the Monterey County Department of Health or other County department. b. “Drug paraphernalia” shall have the definitions set forth in California Health and Safety Code section 11014.5 as that section may be amended from time to time. c. “License” means a tobacco retailer license issued by the City pursuant to this Article. d. “Licensee” means any proprietor holding a license issued by the City pursuant to this Article
e. “License fee” means the charge established by resolution of the City Council, calculated to recover the reasonable regulatory costs of issuing and administering licenses, retailer education, performing investigations, inspections, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.
f. “Person” means any natural person, partnership, cooperative association, corporation, personal representative, receiver, trustee, assignee, or any other legal entity. g. “Proprietor” means a person with an ownership or managerial interest in a business. An ownership interest shall be deemed to exist when a person has a ten (10) percent or greater interest in the stock, assets, or income of a business other than the sole interest of security for debt. A managerial interest shall be deemed to exist when a person can or does have or share ultimate control over the day-to-day operations of a business. h. “Single-use electronic smoking product” means an electronic smoking device that is not refillable or rechargeable and is typically discarded once its contents have been used. It Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 25 includes without limitation:

1. Any electronic device or delivery system that can be used to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine, flavorings, chemicals, or other substances in aerosolized or vaporized form for human consumption, including but not limited to an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, vape pen, or hookah.

2. Any component, part, or accessory of such a device or delivery system that is used during its operation.

3. Any flavored or unflavored liquid or substance, whether sold separately or sold in combination with any such device or delivery system that could be used to deliver tobacco products, nicotine, or other substances in aerosolized or vaporized form.

4. Any product for use in such an electronic device or delivery system whether it contains nicotine or tobacco or is derived from nicotine or tobacco.” i. “Tobacco paraphernalia” means cigarette papers or wrappers, pipes, holders of smoking materials of all types, cigarette rolling machines, and any other item designed or used for the smoking or ingestion of tobacco products.
j. “Tobacco retailer” means any person who engages in tobacco retailing. k. “Tobacco retailing” means selling, offering for sale, exchanging, or offering to exchange for any form of consideration tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco paraphernalia without regard to the quantity sold, offered for sale, exchanged, or offered for exchange.” SECTION 3. Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 19-113 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 19-113. Violations.
a. It shall be a violation of this Article for a tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to violate any federal, state, or local tobacco law or regulation. b. It shall be a violation of this Article to sell flavored tobacco products or tobacco product flavor enhancers in violation of the California Health and Safety Code and, as a greater restriction, such prohibition in this Article does not exempt, but instead expressly applies to premium cigars, shisha tobacco products, or loose-leaf tobacco. i. This subsection does not apply to flavored shisha tobacco products sold at 220 Olivier Street, Monterey for on-site use, so long as the retailer complies with conditions for the sale of flavored shisha tobacco products by a hookah tobacco retailer set out under subsection (c) of California Health and Safety Code Section 104559.5, and so long as the retail sale for on-site use of flavored shisha tobacco at this location is not discontinued for a period of 90 consecutive days or more.
c. Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, or concealing a violation of any provision of this Article shall constitute a violation.
d. Failure to prominently display the Tobacco Retail License in a publicly visible location at the licensed premises shall constitute a violation.
e. The failure of the tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to allow any peace officer, or other authorized government official to conduct unscheduled inspections of the premises of the business for the purpose of ensuring compliance with any federal, state, or local tobacco law or regulations, including any provision of this Article, at any time the business is open for business shall constitute a violation. f. It shall be a violation of this Article for a tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to sell, or offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, any single-use electronic smoking product.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 26 4 g. A tobacco retailer’s possession of four or more flavored tobacco products creates a rebuttable presumption the retailer possesses such flavored tobacco products with intent to sell or offer for sale.
h. The following actions of a tobacco retailer, its employees or agents, creates a rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is flavored:
(1) public statements or claims that the tobacco product imparts a characterizing flavor;
(2) text and/or images on the product’s labeling or packaging to explicitly or implicitly indicate the tobacco product imparts a characterizing flavor; or (3) other actions directed to consumers that would reasonably cause consumers to believe the tobacco or electronic cigarette product imparts a characterizing flavor. “ SECTION 4: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 6. Nothing in this Article shall be interpreted or applied to create any power or duty in conflict with any federal or state law. If any provision of this Article or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Article or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this ___ day of ____ 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 27 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
AMENDING MONTEREY CITY CODE SECTION 38-112.6 “ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS” AND AMENDING SECTION 38-11 “DEFINITIONS”
WHEREAS, California is experiencing a housing crisis, with housing demand outstripping supply. Since 2016, the California State Legislature has brought forward several bills (Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22) relating to the planning and permitting of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) to address the housing supply crisis. Over the years, State ADU and JADU law has been revised to improve its effectiveness at creating more housing units;
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2016, the Governor signed into law SB 1069 and AB 2299, the first bills requiring local jurisdictions to amend their zoning ordinances to allow ADUs consistent with this new State law, which took effect on January 1, 2017; WHEREAS, on January 17, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3560 to amend its Zoning Ordinance to designate areas where ADUs may be located and place other restrictions, consistent with State law;
WHEREAS, on October 9, 2019, the Governor signed into law AB 68, AB 881, and SB 13 to further streamline ADUs and relax development standards, which took effect on January 1, 2020.

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2020, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 3626 to prevent ADUs over 16 feet in height until the Planning Commission had an opportunity to provide policy recommendations. Ordinance No. 3626 also repealed the City’s ADU regulations, which were almost entirely inconsistent with the State law that took effect on January 1, 2020. On December 1, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3633, which extended Ordinance No. 3626 until October 19, 2021;
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3641 to amend the City Code to include ADU zoning regulations to further reduce barriers, better streamline approval processes, and expand the capacity to accommodate the development of ADUs and JADUs, consistent with State law;
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3650 to amend the City Code to be more flexible than State law by waiving lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, and size regulations to allow a second story ADU above a garage or carport up to 25 feet in height and to allow such ADU to have roof pitch and form that is different than the associated singlefamily dwelling or multifamily dwelling, subject to architectural review; WHEREAS, on September 28, 2022, the Governor signed into law AB 2221 and SB 897 to increase the allowed height of attached and detached ADUs and waive front yard setback limits if they prevent construction of certain ADUs, which took effect on January 1, 2023; Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 28 2 WHEREAS, Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 require cities to adopt ADU zoning regulations consistent with the new State law. In the absence of a valid local ordinance, the new State law provides a set of default standards governing local agencies’ regulation and approval of ADUs and JADUs;
WHEREAS, 2015-2023 Housing Element Goal b is to broaden the choice of rental housing types available to residents of Monterey in all price ranges and for all family sizes while maintaining neighborhood compatibility and, where possible, using second units to encourage owner opportunities;
WHEREAS, the amendments are consistent with the purposes of the General Plan, the purposes of the Municipal Code, and other applicable City ordinances; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, took public testimony, and recommended that the City Council adopt the ordinance amendments;
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 2, 2023, took public testimony, and considered the ordinance amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey has determined that the adoption of an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance amendments related to accessory dwelling units implements the provisions of Government Code sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 and is therefore statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2. Monterey City Code Section 38-11 “Definitions” “Accessory Dwelling Unit” is hereby amended to read as follows:

Accessory Dwelling Unit: An attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, which is located on the same parcel as a proposed or existing single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling. An attached accessory dwelling unit is physically attached to the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling, including attached garages. A detached accessory dwelling unit is physically separated from the singlefamily dwelling or multifamily dwelling. An accessory dwelling unit may consist of an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code; or a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.

SECTION 3. Monterey City Code Section 38-112.6 is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows:

1. General Requirements. All accessory dwelling units shall conform with the following:
a. The parcel must be zoned to allow single-family or multifamily use. b. The parcel may contain the following number of accessory dwelling units:

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 29 3 i. Single-Family Dwelling. A parcel with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling may contain one of the following:
(1) A new construction accessory dwelling unit may be developed as attached to or detached from the single-family dwelling.
(2) An accessory dwelling unit within the walls of a proposed or existing single-family dwelling or within an existing accessory structure, including detached garages, may be developed if the unit has exterior access separate from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling; the side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety; and an expansion of the accessory structure for ingress and egress is not more than 150 square feet.
(3) Both one accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit may be developed on the same parcel with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if the accessory dwelling unit is developed as either of the following:
a. A new construction, detached accessory dwelling unit up to 800 square feet in size, up to the allowed height in subsection (2)(d) of this section, and with minimum four-foot side and rear setbacks; or
b. The accessory dwelling unit meets the standards of subsection (1)(b)(i)(2) of this section.
ii. Multifamily Dwelling. A parcel with a multifamily dwelling may contain one of the following:
(1) A parcel with a proposed or existing multifamily dwelling may construct one of the following:
a. One attached accessory dwelling unit meeting the standards of subsection (2); or
b. Up to two detached accessory dwelling units if the accessory dwelling unit does not exceed the allowed height in subsection (2)(d) of this section, and has at least four-foot side and rear setbacks.
(2) A parcel with an existing multifamily dwelling may contain accessory dwelling units converted from portions of the building that are not used as livable space. The number of accessory dwelling units permitted is equivalent to up to 25 percent of the number of existing, legally permitted multifamily dwelling units, or one, whichever is greater.
c. Prior to issuance of a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit, the property owner shall record a covenant in a form prescribed by the city attorney, which shall run with the land and provide for the following:
i. The accessory dwelling unit(s) may not be sold separately from the existing or proposed single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling; and
ii. Neither the accessory dwelling unit(s) nor the junior accessory dwelling unit may be used for short-term residential rentals of less than 30 consecutive days.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 30 4 A copy of the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
d. Prior to issuance of a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit on those certain parcels identified as Monterey County Assessors Parcels: 013-231-027-000, 013-231-017- 000, 013-231-018-000 and 013-231-028-000, the property owner shall provide the City with an avigation easement granted to the Monterey Regional Airport District or evidence that the parcel is no longer within the Monterey Regional Airport Land use Compatibility Plan 65-, 70-, and 75 Community Noise Equivalent Level boundaries.
e. Exemptions.
i. Notwithstanding the development and design standards of this section, accessory dwelling units that meet the standards in subsection (1)(b)(i)(2), (1)(b)(i)(3)(a), (1)(b)(ii)(1)(b), or (1)(b)(ii)(2) of this section are permitted. ii. Notwithstanding subsection (1)(c), a single-family dwelling and accessory dwelling unit that were developed by a qualified nonprofit, as that term is defined in and pursuant to Government Code section 65852.26, may be conveyed pursuant to a tenancy in common agreement that allocates an undivided, unequal interest in the property based on the size of the dwelling that each buyer occupies if the development and the transaction meet the requirements of Government Code Section 65852.26.
f. Fire sprinklers shall not be required in the accessory dwelling unit unless fire sprinklers are required for the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling. Fire sprinklers shall not be required for an existing single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling as a condition of the construction of an accessory dwelling unit.
g. An accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit conforming to the requirements of this section shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the parcel upon which the unit is located and shall be deemed to be a residential use consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the parcel. h. Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units are prohibited in Airport Safety Zones 1 and 6, pursuant to the 2019 Monterey Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. i. An accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit conforming to the provisions of this subsection shall be approved ministerially as provided in Section 38-153(B).

2. Accessory Dwelling Unit Development Standards. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 38-112.6, all accessory dwelling units shall comply with the following development standards:
a. The accessory dwelling unit shall conform to all requirements of the underlying residential zoning district, any applicable overlay district, and all other applicable provisions of this chapter. Notwithstanding this requirement:
i. the accessory dwelling unit is contained in a structure that is unpermitted and/or nonconforming with zoning and/or State and local building code requirements and all of the following apply:
(1) the creation of an accessory dwelling unit does not expand or affect the nonconformity or the building code violations, and
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 31 5 (2) the nonconformity does not pose a threat to public health and safety. ii. the unpermitted accessory dwelling unit was constructed prior to January 1, 2018, even if the accessory dwelling unit is nonconforming with local zoning, California Government Code section 65852.2, and/or State and local building code requirements. However, the city can deny the application for an unpermitted accessory dwelling unit as described in this subsection (a)(ii) if the building is deemed substandard under Section 17920.3 of the Health & Safety Code or if the Building Official makes a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure.
iii. the applicable provisions of this Chapter 38 are inconsistent with the provisions of this Section 38-112.6, in which case the standards of this section shall apply. b. Floor Area.
i. No accessory dwelling unit shall be smaller than the size required to allow an efficiency unit pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17958.1. ii. The floor area of an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 850 square feet for a studio or one bedroom and 1,000 square feet for a unit that contains more than one bedroom.
c. Setbacks. Except as specified below, an accessory dwelling unit shall be required to comply with the setback requirements of the zone in which the unit is to be located. i. No setback is required for an existing living area or an existing accessory structure converted to an accessory dwelling unit, or for a new accessory dwelling unit constructed in the same location and built to the same dimensions as an existing structure, except that:
(1) An expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure is allowed solely for the purpose of accommodating ingress and egress.
(2) Setbacks shall be sufficient for fire safety.
ii. For all other accessory dwelling units, a setback of four feet is required from the rear and side property lines.
d. Height.
i. Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit. The height of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 25 feet or the height limitation that applies to the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling, whichever is lower. However, the accessory dwelling unit may not exceed two stories.
ii. Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit. The height of a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the following:
(1) 16 feet on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling;
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 32 6 (2) 18 feet on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling if the lot is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155. The accessory dwelling unit may be up to 20 feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling (3) 18 feet on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. iii. Second Story Accessory Dwelling Unit Above Garage or Carport. If an accessory dwelling unit is attached to a detached garage or carport, then the accessory dwelling unit is a detached accessory dwelling unit. If a detached accessory dwelling unit exceeds the maximum permitted height set forth in subsection (2)(d)(ii) of this section, the applicant may apply for an exception through the discretionary architectural review process pursuant to Article 25 of this Chapter if:
(1) The total building height is 25 feet or less;
(2) The parcel is within the R-3 zone;
(3) The garage or carport is detached from the single-family dwelling and is at the ground level of the accessory dwelling unit;
(4) No windows or openings are permitted for that portion of the accessory dwelling unit that is closer than four feet to a property line; and (5) Any window parallel to an adjoining property line and closer than 10 feet shall be either:
a. Opaque and inoperable; or
b. Clerestory windows with a minimum height no less than six feet above floor level. (Ord. 3650 § 2, 2022)
e. Limits on lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, front setbacks, and size cannot prevent the construction of a detached or attached accessory dwelling unit, with a maximum floor area of 800 square feet and minimum four-foot side and rear yard setbacks, if the proposed accessory dwelling unit is in compliance with all other development standards. (Ord. 3650 § 3, 2022)
f. Access. An accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate entrance from other dwelling units.
g. Parking.
i. One additional parking space shall be provided per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less, which may be provided as tandem parking on an existing driveway, or in setback areas unless the Community Development Director makes specific findings that tandem parking and parking in setback areas is not feasible because of specific topographical conditions.
ii. No parking may extend into a public sidewalk or public right-of-way.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 33 7 iii. Notwithstanding this provision, no additional parking may be required for an accessory dwelling unit, including an accessory dwelling unit that is being proposed along with a proposed single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling, that is:
(1) Located within one-half mile walking distance of a public transit stop; (2) Located within one block of a car share vehicle pickup location; (3) Located entirely within the proposed or existing single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling or within an existing accessory structure; (4) Located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district; or (5) Located on a parcel where on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
iv. If an existing garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of or replaced by an accessory dwelling unit, the parking spaces do not need to be replaced.
h. Properties with Historic Overlay Zoning or Historic Zoning. Attached or detached accessory dwelling units on a parcel with an H-1 or H-2 designation shall:
i. Be located behind the historic structure, unless these requirements prevent creation of the accessory dwelling unit. If attached, the accessory dwelling unit shall be located at the rear of the main historic structure. If detached, new construction, the accessory dwelling unit shall be located 10 feet behind the rear of the main historic structure; ii. Notwithstanding the design standards below, not match the exterior finish of the historic building; and
iii. Be designed so that any new exterior door for the accessory dwelling unit is not facing the front yard, unless this requirement prevents creation of the accessory dwelling unit. (Ord. 3650 § 4, 2022)
i. Water and Sewer. Accessory dwelling units shall not be permitted on a parcel where water or sewer services are inadequate. Water restrictions imposed by the State Water Resources Control Board’s Cease and Desist Order demonstrate existing water sources are insufficient to meet any expansion of water demand and do not satisfy criteria for the adequacy of water and sewer services. Water credits or water entitlements may be available to offset additional demand for an accessory dwelling unit. The adequacy of water is determined by the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD). Verification of water credits from MPWMD is to be submitted at the time of building permit application.

3. Accessory Dwelling Unit Design Standards. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, all accessory dwelling units shall comply with the following design standards:
a. Colors and Materials. The accessory dwelling unit shall be constructed with facade materials identical in color, and identical in texture and appearance to the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling, including but not limited to roofing, siding, and windows and doors; and
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 7, Packet Page 34 8 b. Roof Pitch and Form. The accessory dwelling unit shall match the roof pitch and roof form of the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling in order to blend with the architecture of the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling. The applicant may apply for an exception through the discretionary architectural review process pursuant to Article 25 of this Chapter.

The Architectural Review Committee may grant such an exception if it finds that an alternative roof pitch and form design are compatible with the single-family or multifamily structure and neighborhood. (Ord. 3650 § 5, 2022)
c. State and Local Building Code Requirements. The accessory dwelling unit shall conform to all applicable State and local building code requirements. The new construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), unless the building official or enforcement agency makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the accessory dwelling unit could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety or the accessory dwelling unit is converted from unhabitable or nonresidential space.

4. Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Development Standards. Junior accessory dwelling units shall conform with the following:
a. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 500 square feet in size and shall contain at least an efficiency kitchen, which includes cooking appliances, a food preparation counter, and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the junior accessory dwelling unit.
b. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate entrance from the entrance of the single-family dwelling.
c. The junior accessory dwelling unit may, but is not required to, include separate sanitation facilities. If separate sanitation facilities are not provided, the junior accessory dwelling unit shall share sanitation facilities with the single-family dwelling. If provided as part of the singlefamily dwelling, the junior accessory dwelling unit shall have direct access to the single-family dwelling so as to not need to go outside to access the bathroom. d. Unless the property is owned by a governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization, one of the dwellings on the parcel must be the bona fide principal residence of at least one legal owner of the parcel, as evidenced at the time of approval of the junior accessory dwelling unit by appropriate documents of title and residency. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit for a junior accessory dwelling unit, the owner shall record a covenant in a form prescribed by the city attorney, which shall run with the land and provide for the following:
i. A prohibition on the sale of the junior accessory dwelling unit separate from the sale of the single-family dwelling;
ii. A restriction on the size and attributes of the junior accessory dwelling unit consistent with this section;
iii. A prohibition against renting the property for fewer than 30 consecutive calendar days; and
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 8, Packet Page 35 9 iv. A requirement that either the single-family dwelling or the junior accessory dwelling unit be the owner’s bona fide principal residence, unless the owner is a governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.

A copy of the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
f. Parking is not required for junior accessory dwelling units. However, if an existing attached garage is replaced by a junior accessory dwelling unit, each removed parking space must be replaced with an off-street parking space that does not extend into the public right-of-way. If the proposed replacement parking is uncovered parking located in the driveway, the dimensions of the off-street parking space should at least be nine feet by 18 feet and the space may occupy any part of the driveway so long as it does not extend into the public rightof-way and is not located in the front yard setback. g. Junior accessory dwelling units shall not be permitted on a parcel where water or sewer services are inadequate. Water restrictions imposed by the State Water Resources Control Board’s Cease and Desist Order demonstrate existing water sources are insufficient to meet any expansion of water demand and do not satisfy criteria for the adequacy of water and sewer services. Water credits or water entitlements may be available to offset additional demand for a junior accessory dwelling unit. The adequacy of water is determined by the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD). Verification of water credits from MPWMD is to be submitted at the time of building permit application.

5. Utilities and Impact Fees.
a. Except as provided in subsection (5)(b) of this section, an accessory dwelling unit shall provide a new or separate utility connection, including a separate sewer lateral, between the accessory dwelling unit and the utility, unless the applicant has obtained a sewer lateral inspection performed by a licensed plumber demonstrating that the sewer lateral meets the City’s standards and specifications. Proof that the sewer lateral meets the City’s requirements shall be submitted on a sewer lateral inspection form provided by the City and completed by the professional who completed the inspection. A connection fee or capacity charge may be charged that is proportionate to the size in square feet of the accessory dwelling unit or its drainage fixture unit (DFU) values. Separate electric and water submeters shall be required for the accessory dwelling unit, except that separate water meters shall be required for accessory dwelling units if and when California American Water is allowed to connect new water meters. (Ord. 3650 § 6, 2022)
b. Junior accessory dwelling units and accessory dwelling units converted from the existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure are exempt from any requirement to install a new or separate utility connection and to pay any associated connection or capacity fees or charges, unless the accessory dwelling unit is constructed within a new single-family dwelling.
c. All utility extensions shall be placed underground.
d. No impact fees may be imposed on an accessory dwelling unit that is less than 750 square feet in size. For purposes of this section, "impact fees" include the fees specified in Sections 66000 and 66477 of the Government Code, but do not include utility connection fees or capacity charges. For accessory dwelling units that have a floor area of 750 square feet or Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 9, Packet Page 36 10 more, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling.

6. Process and Timing.
a. Permit Review. The City requires a building permit and, as applicable, any additional services permits, to create and serve an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit.
i. The City must approve or deny an application for a permit to create or serve an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit within 60 days from the date that the City receives the completed application without discretionary review or a hearing, unless either:
(1) The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay; or
(2) When an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit is submitted along with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling on the parcel, the City may delay approving or denying the permit application until the City approves or denies the permit application to create the single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling; or
(3) The applicant requests discretionary architectural review for a second story accessory dwelling unit above a detached garage or carport that exceeds the height limit pursuant to subsection (2)(d)(ii) of this section and/or for alternative roof pitch/form, as provided in subsection (2)(d)(iii) or (3)(b) of this section. (Ord. 3650 § 7, 2022)
ii. If the City denies the permit application, the City will provide to the applicant within the 60 day review period a complete list of the application's deficiencies and describe how the applicant can remedy the application.
iii. If the applicant applies for a demolition permit to demolish a detached garage or carport and a building permit to construct a detached accessory dwelling unit, the demolition permit and building permit for the detached accessory dwelling unit will be issued at the same time. b. Mills Act. An accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit proposed on a property subject to a Mills Act contract pursuant to Government Code section 50280 et seq. must comply with the provisions of the contract, including conformance to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standard for Rehabilitation, and the California Historical Building Code. (Ord. 3641 § 20, 2021) SECTION 4. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 10, Packet Page 37 11 any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 7. Publication. Pursuant to Charter section 4.4, this ordinance shall be published in the Monterey County Herald, a newspaper printed and published in the County of Monterey, at least three days before its adoption.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall send a copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption, as required by State law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this __ day of __________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor
City Clerk
5349212.1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 11, Packet Page 38 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Thomas Harty, Acting Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Identify the Rehabilitation of Monroe Street as the Project to be Funded by SB 1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Rehabilitation of Monroe Street to be funded with revenues from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns,” Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement,” and Active Mobility – “Maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.” FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1 Beall) provides for the allocations of various funds to state and local agencies for transportation purposes. Among those funds are formula-based allocations from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA).

The City of Monterey is projected to receive RMRA funds in the amount of $784,110 for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 39 the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose not to approve Monroe Street as the project to be funded by SB 1; however, this is not recommended. Based on the City’s Pavement Management System, the reconstruction of the identified street segment of Monroe Street is a high-priority, cost-effective project that meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment.

DISCUSSION:

Cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to a bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network. Police, fire, and emergency medical services all need safe reliable roads to react quickly to emergency calls, and a few minutes of delay can be a matter of life and death.

Maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduced vehicle emissions helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals. Restoring roads before they fail also reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off.

Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide. SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Monterey are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year.

The City must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. The street segments are identified based on the City’s Pavement Management System.

Based on the City’s Pavement Management System, the Rehabilitation of Monroe Street (between Franklin and Bayview Academy entrance), which includes, but is not limited to, the removal and replacement of asphalt, is a high-priority and cost-effective project that also meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment. This Monroe Street segment serves residents as well as the main entrance to Bayview Academy. The estimated $784,110 in RMRA funding will be budgeted towards the completion of the project, which is estimated to begin construction in 2024. The repairs will have an estimated useful life of 20 years.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 40 City Council will separately budget HUTA (Gas Tax) funds as part of the FY2023-24 CIP Budget for this project; however, SB 1 requires a specific Council action to identify where the RMRA funds will be utilized.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Rehabilitation of Monroe Street, from Franklin to Bayview entrance, to be funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

AR/mr
Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 41 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22

IDENTIFY THE REHABILITATION OF MONROE STREET AS THE PROJECT TO BE FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide;
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Monterey are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1 which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $784,110 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2023-24 from SB 1;
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community priorities for transportation investment; WHEREAS, if the Legislature and Governor failed to act, city streets and county roads would have continued to deteriorate, having many and varied negative impacts on our community;
WHEREAS, cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to the bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network;
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 42 2 WHEREAS, police, fire, and emergency medical services all need safe reliable roads to react quickly to emergency calls and a few minutes of delay can be a matter of life and death; WHEREAS, maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduce vehicle emissions helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals; WHEREAS, restoring roads before they fail also reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off; WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide;
WHEREAS, based on the City’s Pavement Management System, Rehabilitation of Monroe Street is the highest priority and cost-effective project that also meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment. The estimated $784,110 in RMRA funding will be budgeted towards the completion of the project, which is estimated to begin construction in early 2024. The repairs include but are not limited to the removal and replacement of asphalt and will have an estimated useful life of 20 years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 43 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby identifies the following project to be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues:
 Rehabilitation of Monroe Street, Franklin Street to Bayview Academy entrance; Estimated Useful Life: 20 years; Anticipated Year of Construction: 2024.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 44 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Marissa Garcia, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Master Programs Funding Agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County to Receive Allocations from Regional Surface Transportation Program, Regional Development Impact Fee, and Transportation Development Act 2% Program, Amend Resolution 22-135 to include the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project, and Authorize an Increase of FY23 Revenue and Appropriation of Regional Surface Transportation Funds in the Amount of $208,940.31 ***CIP*** (Mitigated Negative Declaration Previously Approved) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Master Programs Funding Agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to receive allocations from Regional Surface Transportation Program (“RSTP”), Regional Development Impact Fee (“RDIF”), and Transportation Development Act 2% Program;

2. Amending Resolution 22-135 to include the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP);

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to increase FY23 revenue and appropriate $208,940.31 to the Capital Projects Fund, Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project. This appropriation is fully funded by the Regional Surface Transportation Program Fair Share reimbursements.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with City Council policies to approve agreements with outside agencies and to accept funding for transportation infrastructure projects, which support City Council’s Value Drivers and strategic priorities of fiscal stewardship and active mobility.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 45 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City will receive $208,940.31 in Fair Share funding and will apply for competitive funding for the three year funding cycle. The City is also eligible for additional funds from the RSTP Quick Build Pilot Program, RSTP Competitive Program, approved projects on the RDIF, and eligible projects from the Transportation Development Act 2% Program.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration on February 16th, 2016. The following mitigation measures were included in the project approval:

Mitigation Measure #1:

Prior to work commencing; including staging, clearing, and grubbing, surveys for active bird nests shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no more than 10 days prior to the start of the of the Project commencing and that the surveys be conducted in a sufficient area around the work site to identify any nests that are present and to determine their status. A sufficient area means any nest within an area that could potentially be affected by the Project. In addition to direct impacts, such as nest destruction, nests might be affected by noise, vibration, odors, and movement of workers or equipment. Identified nests should be continuously surveyed for the first 24 hours prior to any construction related activities to establish a behavioral baseline.

Once work commences, all nests should be continuously monitored to detect any behavioral changes as a result of the Project. If behavioral changes are observed, the work causing that change should cease and the Department consulted for additional avoidance and minimization measures.

Mitigation Measure #2:

1. A archaeological study is required for any project that involves ground disturbance.

2. The project shall follow the provisions of AB 52 at Pub. Resources Code, § 21084.3: (1) Avoidance and preservation of the resources in place, including, but not limited to, planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context, or planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria. (2) Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following: (A) Protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource. (B) Protecting the traditional use of the resource. (C) Protecting the confidentiality of the resource. (3) Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. (4) Protecting the resource.

3. The following notations shall be included on all plans for ground disturbance:
a. If archaeological materials or features are discovered at any time during construction, work shall be halted within 50 meters (150 feet) of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist (defined as one who is certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists). If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be formulated and implemented to ensure that no substantial adverse change, including alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 46 b. If human remains are discovered at any time during construction, work shall be halted within 50 meters (150 feet) of the find
c. The contractor shall call the Monterey County Coroner and await the Coroner's clearance. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. d. NAHC shall notify the most likely descendent.
e. The Native American descendent, with permission of the land owner or representative, may inspect the site of the discovery and recommend the means for treating or disposing with appropriate dignity the human remains and any associated grave goods.
f. The Native American descent shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 24 hours of their notification by the Native American Heritage Commission. The recommendation may include the removal and analysis of human remains and associate items; preservation of the Native American human remains and associated items in place; relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment; other culturally appropriate treatment. If the NAHC is unable to identify a descendent or the descendent identified fails to make a recommendation within 24 hours, the landowner shall reinter the human remains and items associated with the Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance.
g. If the landowner and Native American descendent reach agreement on the appropriate procedure, the landowner shall follow this procedure. h. If the landowner and Native American descent cannot reach agreement, the parties shall consult with the Native American Heritage Commission. The landowner shall consider and if agreeable follow the identified procedure. i. If the landowner and Native American descendant cannot reach agreement after consultation, the Native American human remains shall be reinterred on the property with appropriate dignity.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

There are no alternatives recommended as entering into this agreement is required in order to receive the allocations from the Regional Surface Transportation Program, Regional Development Impact Fee, and Transportation Development Act 2% Program.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this Master Funding Agreement is to enable the City to receive allocations from the Regional Surface Transportation Program, Regional Development Impact Fee, and Transportation Development Act 2% Program. The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) is the Regional Transportation Planning Agency for Monterey County, and as such, TAMC is responsible for distributing state and federal funds for local transportation projects.

Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
The Regional Surface Transportation Program was established by the State of California to utilize federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP) funds for a wide variety of transportation projects. The State allows the Transportation Agency to exchange these federal Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 47 funds for state funds to maximize the ability of local public works departments to use the funds on a wide variety of projects including bicycle and pedestrian projects, local roads, and transit.

The City of Monterey receives both a fair share of RSTP funds and is eligible for the competitive funds in the Quick-Build Pilot Program and the Competitive Grant Program. The City’s fair share apportionment uses a distribution formula based on 50% population and 50% centerline miles.

This is consistent with past fair share distributions and the distribution of Measure X tax funds.

The City will receive $208,940.31 from the fair share distribution. The City will also be applying for the Quick Build Pilot Program and the Competitive Grant Program. Grant applications are in progress and the potential additional RSTP funds from successful grant applications is not known at this time. TAMC will announce successful grant awardees in August 2023.

The City has applied for grant funds from the RSTP Competitive Grant Program in the past two RSTP Cycles. The City successfully delivered the North Fremont Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Improvement Project and the City is currently working on the delivery of the Citywide Pedestrian and Bike Upgrades Project from the prior RSTP cycle. Other past projects utilizing RSTP funds include the Holman Highway 68 Roundabout Project.

The City will be applying for RSTP competitive grant funds for the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle, and Pedestrian Improvement Project. The proposed project will include improvements to the Recreation Trail connection from the Waterfront/Marina Parking Lot to Downtown, shortened pedestrian crossings, additional safety lighting, ADA curb ramps, ADA signal improvements, a Pedestrian Island Refuge, and a “Crossbike” crosswalk for bicycles. The project will increase access for persons with disabilities and seniors and improve safety and traffic operations for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles.

Regional Development Impact Fee (RDIF)
The Regional Development Impact Fee program, as adopted by the Transportation Agency Board of Directors and each of the jurisdictions, went into effect in August 2008. Prior to the adoption of the regional fee program, development proposals were evaluated on a case-by-case basis for cumulative impacts to the regional transportation network as part of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. The purpose of establishing a county-wide Regional Fee program was to streamline the environmental review of new development and establish a consistent methodology to assess in-lieu fees as a CEQA mitigation for new trips on the regional transportation system.

The City, which was the lead agency for the Holman Highway 68 Roundabout Project, received $342,496 in funds from the RDIF program in the past. If the City were to be the lead agency of a project eligible for the RDIF program in the next three years, the Master Agreement would allow TAMC to allocate RDIF funds to the City.

Transportation Development Act 2% (TDA 2%) Program
The Transportation Development Act provides for two sources of funding: Local Transportation Funds and State Transit Assistance. The program was established for the purpose of providing funding for public transit in California. These funds are considered local funds and are used for public transit operations and capital upgrades. Transportation Development Act funds are Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 48 derived from a ¼ cent general sales tax collected by the State and returned to Monterey County.

Local Transportation Funds can be used for the following purposes: planning, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, rail passenger service, public transit, special group transportation service, local streets and roads, and administration. The City has benefited from this funding source in the past.

The Transportation Agency Master Funding Agreement memorializes conditions and requirements for local agencies to use state funds passed through by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County. Each agency receiving Regional Surface Transportation Program, Regional Development Impact Fee, and Transportation Development Act 2% funds will be required to enter into a master agreement. The Master Agreements are in effect for a period of three years and are updated with each new cycle of the Regional Surface Transportation Program to incorporate any new provisions. The current funding agreement between TAMC and the city is set to expire August 31, 2023, and a new agreement will need to be executed before reimbursements can be approved.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Master Programs Funding Agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to receive allocations from Regional Surface Transportation Program (“RSTP”), Regional Development Impact Fee (“RDIF”), and Transportation Development Act 2% Program;

2. Amending Resolution 22-135 to include the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP);

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to increase FY23 revenue and appropriate $208,940.31 to the Capital Projects Fund, Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Improvement Project. This appropriation is fully funded by the Regional Surface Transportation Program Fair Share reimbursements.

MG/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Attachment 2: Draft Agreement

3. Attachment 3: Exhibit A of the Draft Agreement
e: Janneke Stause, Transportation Agency for Monterey County Mike Zeller, Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 49 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A MASTER PROGRAMS FUNDING

AGREEMENT WITH THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY TO

RECEIVE ALLOCATIONS FROM THE REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAM, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE, AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT 2% PROGRAM, AMEND RESOLUTION 22-135 TO INCLUDE THE DEL

MONTE/ WASHINGTON INTERSECTION BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZE AN INCREASE OF FY23 REVENUE AND APPROPRIATION OF REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $208,940.31 ***CIP***
WHEREAS, the Regional Surface Transportation Program was established by the State of California to utilize federal Surface Transportation Program funds for a wide variety of transportation projects;
WHEREAS, the State allows the Transportation Agency to exchange these federal funds for state funds to maximize the ability of local public works departments to use the funds on a wide variety of transportation projects;
WHEREAS, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (“TAMC”) is authorized by Chapter 2, Title 21, Rule 6640 of the Transportation Development Act and one of the duties of TAMC is to administer the provisions of the Transportation Development Act in apportioning Local Transportation Funds for the Transportation Development Act 2% program for bicycle and pedestrian projects pursuant to Article 3 of that law, and to the Cities, County, and MontereySalinas Transit; WHEREAS, TAMC is authorized by the Joint Powers Agreement for the Monterey County Regional Development Impact Fee Agency and is designated to administer and allocate regional development impact fee revenues (RDIF) to projects identified in the approved Strategic Expenditure Plan;
WHEREAS, funds allocated from the Regional Surface Transportation Program, Transportation Development Act 2% program, and Regional Development Impact Fees would potentially fund infrastructure improvement projects to improve transportation safety, mobility and access in the City of Monterey;
WHEREAS, the Del Monte/ Washington Intersection Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project proposes to improve safety, mobility and access through intersection improvements;
WHEREAS, these improvements will create more pedestrian and bike friendly intersections as well as ensuring our signal infrastructure remains reliable and dependable; and; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration on February 16th, 2016 for the Waterfront Master Plan. which includes the Del Monte/ Washington Intersection Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project, Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 50 2 Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) were circulated for public review for the required 30-day public review period, from August 20, 2015 to September 21, 2015 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office by appointment and on the City’s website; and the IS/MND identifies that the project could result in potentially significant environmental impacts associated with biological resources and cultural resources, and Mitigation Measures have been required that reduce the potential impacts to a less-thansignificant level, and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY it hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager to enter into a Master Programs Funding Agreement with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to receive allocations from Regional Surface Transportation Program (“RSTP”), Regional Development Impact Fee (“RDIF”), and Transportation Development Act 2% Program;

2. Amends Resolution 22-135 to include the Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP);

3. Authorizes the Finance Director to increase FY23 revenue and appropriate $208,940.31 to the Capital Projects Fund, Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project, This appropriation is fully funded by the Regional Surface Transportation Program Fair Share reimbursements.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 51

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY

AND THE CITY OF MONTEREY

FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDING APPROVED BY

THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
This agreement is made on _____________ by and between the City of Monterey, a public body, hereinafter referred to as “Recipient,” and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County, hereinafter referred to as “TAMC.”
WHEREAS, TAMC is the state-designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency for Monterey County; and
WHEREAS, as authorized by section 182.6(g) of the Streets and Highways Code, TAMC has entered into a separate agreement with the State of California, through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to assign a defined portion of its annual federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP) apportionment to Caltrans in exchange for state funds for specified fiscal year(s); and
WHEREAS, TAMC is authorized to use these exchanged funds (hereinafter referred to as “RSTP Exchange Funds”) to assist local agencies to promote projects which otherwise qualify for STBGP funds; and
WHEREAS, as authorized by Chapter 2, Title 21, Rule 6640 of the Transportation Development Act, one of the duties of TAMC is to administer the provisions of the Transportation Development Act in apportioning Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for the Transportation Development Act 2% (TDA 2%) program for bicycle and pedestrian projects pursuant to Article 3 of that law, and to the Cities, County, and Monterey-Salinas Transit; WHEREAS, as authorized by the Joint Powers Agreement for the Monterey County Regional Development Impact Fee Agency, TAMC is designated to administer and allocate regional development impact fee revenues (RDIF) to projects identified in the approved Strategic Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, the TAMC Board of Directors has approved the allocation of funds toward the projects listed in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated by TAMC and the Recipient that the amount of funding and the projects designated in Exhibit A may change from time to time as set forth below; and WHEREAS, TAMC has requested the Monterey County Auditor-Controller to establish a separate fund for the Federal Apportionment Exchange Program and such a separate fund has been established.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 52 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. RULES FOR RSTP EXCHANGE FUNDS
A. TAMC agrees to allocate RSTP Exchange Funds paid by Caltrans under the Federal Apportionment Exchange Program only for projects as authorized under sections 133(b) and 133 (c) of Title 23, United States Code and Article XIX of the California State Constitution.

B. The Recipient agrees to use RSTP Exchange Funds only for the RSTP Exchange eligible project(s) described in Exhibit A, as approved by the TAMC Board of Directors, for the amounts awarded for each project.

2. RULES FOR TDA 2%
A. TAMC agrees to allocate TDA 2% funds under the Transportation Development Act only for projects as authorized under the Transportation Development Act Section 99234 Claims for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities.

B. The Recipient agrees to use TDA 2% funds only for TDA 2% eligible project(s) described in Exhibit A, as approved by the TAMC Board of Directors, for the amounts awarded for each project.

3. RULES FOR RDIF
A. TAMC agrees to allocate RDIF funds under the Joint Powers Agreement only for projects as authorized by the TAMC Board of Directors in the approved Strategic Expenditure Plan.

B. The Recipient agrees to use RDIF funds only for RDIF eligible project(s) described in Exhibit A, as approved by the TAMC Board of Directors, for the amounts awarded for each project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 53

4. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES
A. The projects described in Exhibit A, and the amounts allocated therefore, may be amended from time to time without changing the rest of this Master Agreement, by means of approval by the TAMC Board of Directors of a revised Exhibit A, which shall be designated by a date and number (e.g., “Exhibit A-1 (DATE)”).

B. The Recipient agrees to submit an annual report to TAMC by April 30 describing the progress towards completion for all projects listed in Exhibit A.

C. The Recipient agrees to mention TAMC’s role in funding the project in any press releases or media events held by the Recipient to promote a funded project.

D. TAMC agrees to reimburse the Recipient within 30 days of receipt of a completed claim form (Exhibit B) from the Recipient.

E. The Recipient agrees to cause the completion of the project(s) within three years from the date funds were awarded by the TAMC Board of Directors, as recorded in Exhibit A. Failure to complete the project(s) in a timely basis shall allow TAMC to refuse reimbursement and to reprogram such funds for other purposes.

5. COST PRINCIPLES
A. Recipient agrees to comply with Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Government, and 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements.

B. Recipient agrees to:
(a) use Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., to determine the allowability of individual project cost items; and
(b) comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles and Audit Requirements.

Every sub-recipient receiving funds as a contractor or sub-contractor under this AGREEMENT shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles and Audit Requirements.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 54

6. THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING
A. Recipient shall not award a construction contract over $10,000 or other contracts over $25,000 on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed using Funds without the prior written approval of Caltrans. This provision shall not apply to professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code Sections 4525 (d), (e), and (f).

B. Recipient agrees that travel and per diem reimbursements and third-party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as project costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors and only if consistent with Paragraph 10, below.

C. In addition to the above, the pre-award requirements of third party contractor/ consultants with Recipient shall be consistent with Local Program Procedures as published by Caltrans.

7. ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
Recipient, its contractors and subcontractors, shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate expenditures by line item.

The accounting system of Recipient, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment claims.

8. RIGHT TO AUDIT
For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters connected with the performance of the Agreement pursuant to Government Code 8546.7, Recipient shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the Agreement, including but not limited to, the costs of administering the Agreement. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for three years from the date of final payment under the Agreement. The state, State Auditor, TAMC, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of Consultant and its certified public accountants (CPA) work papers that are pertinent to the Agreement and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain this provision.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 55

9. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE
Payments to Recipient for travel and subsistence expenses of Recipient forces and/or its contractors or subcontractors, claimed for reimbursement or applied as local match credit, shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid exempt non-represented State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced are in excess of those authorized DPA rates, then Recipient is responsible for the cost difference and any overpayments shall be reimbursed to the TAMC on demand.

10. PROJECT COMPLETION
Recipient agrees to provide to the TAMC a short report summarizing total project costs and milestones, including before and after photos of the project, for each project within sixty (60) days of completion.

11. GOVERNING LAWS
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California, and the parties hereby agree that the County of Monterey shall be the proper venue for any dispute arising hereunder.

12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Recipient warrants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest during the term of this Agreement, which would directly or indirectly conflict in any manner or to any degree with its full and complete performance of all services under this Agreement.

13. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT
The parties agree that each party has fully participated in the review and revision of this Agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any exhibit or amendment. To that end, it is understood and agreed that this Agreement has been arrived at through negotiation, and that neither party is to be deemed the party which prepared this Agreement within the meaning of Civil Code Section 1654. Section and paragraph headings appearing herein are for convenience only and shall not be used to interpret the terms of this Agreement.

14. WAIVER
Any waiver of any term or condition hereof must be in writing. No such waiver shall be construed as a waiver of any other term or condition herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 12, Packet Page 56

15. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This Agreement and all rights, privileges, duties and obligations hereunder, to the extent assignable or delegable, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors, permitted assigns and heirs.

16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
The parties mutually acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence with respect to every provision hereof in which time is an element. No extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall be deemed an extension of time for performance of any other obligation or act, nor shall any such extension create a precedent for any further or future extension.

17. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
Any individual executing this Agreement on behalf of an entity represents and warrants that he or she has the requisite authority to enter into this Agreement on behalf of such entity and to bind the entity to the terms and conditions hereof. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This document, including all exhibits hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes any and all prior written or oral negotiations and representations between the parties concerning all matters relating to the subject of this Agreement.

19. TERMINATION DATE
This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of three (3) years from the date of this Agreement.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 13, Packet Page 57 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TAMC and Recipient execute this Agreement as follows:

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
_________________________________ ___________
Todd Muck Date
Executive Director
Recipient:

CITY OF MONTEREY
_______________________________ ___________
Hans Uslar, City Manager Date
Approved as to Form:
_______________________________ ___________
Robert Brayer Date
TAMC Counsel
_______________________________ ___________
City Attorney Date
City of Monterey
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 14, Packet Page 58 Attachment 3
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 15, Packet Page 59 Attachment 3
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 16, Packet Page 60 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT: Receive Calle Principal Street Maintenance District 00-1 Engineer's Report; Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment; and Set Time for Public Hearing (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Receive the attached Engineer's Report;

2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment;

3. Authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presentation in Part A of the Engineer’s Report; and

4. Set public hearing for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment.

This is a property-based district in which liability for the assessment is premised upon a person’s property ownership.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action continues a process the City has followed since 2000 that establishes an annual assessment to repair and maintain improvements, and to add to these improvements as necessary, to meet the original intent of the district's formation. The Calle Principal Street Maintenance District was formed under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act (Streets & Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 61 Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes assessments to install, construct, and maintain landscaping, lighting, and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Calle Principal Street Maintenance District funds maintenance above and beyond normal maintenance activities, with the cost of the improvements reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels. General benefits to the public at large are not paid from special assessments. There is sufficient surplus in the Maintenance District’s ending balance to carry forward a credit into the FY23/24 budget. Consistent with Streets & Highways Code section 22656, a credit of $28,678.00 from the previous year balance will be applied to the FY 23/24 budget and as a result the assessment levy will be $0.11/linear foot/month. City of Monterey will be responsible for paying for the assessments for the City owned parcels within the district.

Funds for this will come from:
 The Parking Fund for the Calle Principal garage and surface lot;  The General Fund for the park parcel frontage; and the City-owned portion of the assessment for 408 Alvarado Street (Monterey Hotel).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to proceed with the reassessment of this District, however, that is not recommended, as the assessment pays for maintenance of improvements that contribute to a clean and safe environment conductive to commerce. Failure to re-establish the District will discontinue this maintenance of improvements. If the reallocation of the prior years balance is not approved then the assessment amount ($/foot/month) would need to be increased.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 62 DISCUSSION:

The Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-1 was established under the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The purpose of this District is to make minor improvements along the entire length of Calle Principal. All parcels that receive a special benefit have been identified and included in the report.

The staff recommendation continues a legal process, which began at the Council's meeting of February 7, 2023 when the Council ordered the preparation of the Engineer's Report to establish the annual assessment for the maintenance of Calle Principal Improvements. The Engineer’s Report separates the general benefits to the public at large from the special benefits the assessed parcels will receive. Property based assessments may only be used to pay for the special benefits provided by the improvements and activities of a district and may not be used to pay for general benefits. (California Constitution Art XIIID §4(a).) Therefore, the Engineer’s Report must separate and quantify the special and general benefits and assess property owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits.

Staff met with the assessment district coordinator on March 24th, 2023. At that meeting, staff presented the currently provided service and the following recommendations:

Current Assessment Services:
 Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning (quarterly).  Includes charging City administrative cost for the assessment district.  Contractual costs include sidewalk cleaning, City administrative cost, and Assessment District Coordinator.

Members of the assessment district recommended continuing the current level of service.

Upon receipt of the Engineer’s Report, staff recommends holding a public hearing on July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. regarding the report. The approval process requires 45 days’ prior notice of a public hearing for this assessment. After the public hearing, if a majority protest is not received, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution certifying compliance with State law relating to the assessment prior to the County’s August 1, 2023 deadline. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those who are not in favor of the assessment. In other words, ballots received are weighted so that parcels proposed to have a larger assessment count more. It is not a “one parcel, one vote” proceeding. Unless a majority of the weighted ballots are in favor of the proposed assessment, the City may not impose the assessment. A majority protest exists if 50% plus one of the record owners of the parcels subject to the charge submit a timely written protest. To be timely, the written protest must be submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive the attached Engineer’s Report;
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 63

2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment;

3. Authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presented in Part A of the Engineer’s Report; and,

4. Set a public hearing for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment.

CH/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A: Engineer’s Report
e: Peter Cofresi, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 64 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
RECEIVE CALLE PRINCIPAL STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT; ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENT; AND SET

TIME FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District was established in 2000 under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act (Streets & Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes the assessment to install, construct, and maintain landscaping, lighting, and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal on Calle Principal; WHEREAS, the cost of the improvements has been reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels, according to the special benefits;
WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District has been renewed annually and has remained in effect since the establishment of the district; WHEREAS, all parcels that receive a special benefit are included in the district and the cost of the benefits are reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels according to special benefits;
WHEREAS, general benefits available to the public at large are not paid from special assessments;
WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District funds maintenance, which contributes to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce; WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 22656, a credit from the previous year ending balance will be applied to this year’s assessment, which results in an assessment rate of $0.11/linear foot/month; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 65 2 to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The Engineer’s Report ordered by Resolution No. 23-016 C.S. has been submitted to the City Council and is accepted as submitted.

2. The Engineer’s Report is filed with the City Clerk.

3. The Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect an assessment on the properties within the Calle Principal Maintenance District No. 00-1 as set forth in the Engineer’s Report. Said report may be referred to for further particulars.

4. The purpose of the assessment is for installation and maintenance of street improvements, miscellaneous street furnishings, and landscaping. There are no new improvements or substantial changes contemplated. This maintenance work will result in a special benefit to the properties assessed by upgrading street trees, and providing cleaning of sidewalks and litter pickup, which will invite and promote commercial use of the property.

5. A general description of the district boundaries is Calle Principal between Del Monte Avenue and Polk Street in the City of Monterey, County of Monterey, State of California.

The initial proceedings for formation of the district, on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Monterey, are referred to for a detailed description of the district boundaries and improvements.

6. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presented in Part A of the Engineer’s Report.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein and that a public hearing is set for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment. The assessment is subject a majority protest voting procedure. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 66 3 who are not in favor of the assessment. Protest may be in writing only. All interested parties may also file a written report with the Clerk of the City of Monterey prior to said hearing.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 67 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2023/2024
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director, Engineer of Work for the Calle Principal Maintenance District, City of Monterey, Monterey County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

The improvements, which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

The maintenance and installation, including but not limited to, street improvements, landscaping and street furniture, cleaning of sidewalks, upgrading street trees, and litter pickup on Calle Principal between Del Monte Avenue and Polk Street, and side streets of Franklin Street and Bonifacio Plaza.

This report consists of five parts as follows:

PART A - An estimate of the cost of the improvements.

PART B - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART C - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART D - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Part C by assessment number.

PART E - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part B by assessment number.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrea Renny , P.E., PTOE
Engineer of Work

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 68 2 ENGINEER'S REPORT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: _________________ Andrea Renny, Public Works Director City of Monterey, Engineer of Work
By:_______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _____ day of ___________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Monterey, California on the ______ day of _____________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________ day of ____________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 9, Packet Page 69 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
Estimated Costs for FY 2023/2024
5/2/23

ACCOUNT ENGINEER'S BUDGET
Personnel
Salaries $7,192.80
Benefits $3,631.45
Retirement $4,005.44
SUB TOTAL $14,829.69
Operating supplies 4205 $425.00
Utilities 4211 $0.00
Contractual services 4220 $16,536.00
Vehicle rental 4248 $405.00
SUB TOTAL $17,366.00
Capital outlay-Special Projects 4285 $195.00
SUB TOTAL $195.00
Assessment cost TOTAL $32,390.69
June 30, 2022 District Surplus Credit per S&H Code 22656 (28,678.00) $3,712.69
$0.11
Total Lineal Feet (LF) of Frontage = 2842.68 LF
Contractual 4220 $250.00
$4,800.00
$1,200.00
$10,286.00
SUB TOTAL $16,536.00
Capital Outlay / Special Project 4285 $195.00
SUB TOTAL $195.00
Grounds maintenance
Basic Assessment District Cost: Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning and grounds maintenance, and allows the ability to pursue additional Capital Outlay.

Net amount to be assessed
Cost per LF/month
Sidewalk cleaning (4)
Assessment Dist Coordinator
City administrative cost
Other District improvements
PART A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 10, Packet Page 70 Assessment
Number Assessor Parcel Number
Calle Principal Frontage
(ft)
Percentage of Total
Calle Principal Frontage Annual Assessment
1 001-525-009 23 0.81% $30.04
2 001-525-006 40 1.41% $52.24
3 001-525-005 60 2.11% $78.36
4 001-525-022 53.3 1.87% $69.61
5 001-525-021 86.5 3.04% $112.97
6 001-525-003 42 1.48% $54.85
7 001-525-002 59 2.08% $77.06
8 001-525-020 146.1 5.14% $190.81
9 001-534-010 40.78 1.43% $53.26
10 001-534-009 85 2.99% $111.01
11 001-534-008 69.77 2.45% $91.12
12 001-534-007 69.77 2.45% $91.12
13 001-534-011 176.66 6.21% $230.73
14 001-535-001 60 2.11% $78.36
15 001-534-001 35 1.23% $45.71
16 001-534-003 50 1.76% $65.30
17 001-534-002 71.8 2.53% $93.77
18 001-384-003 303.7 10.68% $396.65
19 001-385-001 102.01 3.59% $133.23
20 001-385-002 138.47 4.87% $180.85
21 001-385-004 20.23 0.71% $26.42
22 001-385-0005 45 1.58% $58.77
23 001-572-017 20.31 0.71% $26.53
24 001-572-025 124.86 4.39% $163.07
25 001-572-013 69.16 2.43% $90.33
26 001-572-021 22.17 0.78% $28.96
27 001-572-020 35.58 1.25% $46.47
28 001-572-010 51 1.79% $66.61
29 001-572-009 50.99 1.79% $66.60
30 001-572-032 5.02 0.18% $6.56
31 001-572-031 122.56 4.31% $160.07
32 001-572-004 104.24 3.67% $136.14
33 001-572-003 61.75 2.17% $80.65
34 001-572-018 124.5 4.38% $162.60
35 001-571-004 32 1.13% $41.79
36 001-571-002 170.52 6.00% $222.71
37 001-571-001 69.93 2.46% $91.33
Totals 2842.68 100.00% $3,712.69
FY 23/24 Assessment will be $0.11/LF/month

CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
00-1 Annual Assessment for FY 2023/2024
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 11, Packet Page 71 PART B PART C

METHOD OF ALLOCATING COSTS ON THE BASIS OF BENEFIT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The method utilized to allocate the costs associated with the benefits of the district shall be based upon lineal footage of frontage. The total cost necessary to be collected will be divided by the total frontage of the district. This will result in a cost per lineal foot. This amount will be multiplied by the lineal footage of each property frontage on Calle Principal.

The cost per lineal foot of frontage for the FY 2023/2024 is $0.11 per month.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 12, Packet Page 72 # APN PARCEL ADDRESS OWNER NAME
1 001-525-009 232 Madison Street Panetta Joseph R 4028 Sunset Lane Pebble Beach, CA 93953 2 001-525-006 590 Calle Principal State of California 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 3 001-525-005 580 Calle Principal Raven Path LLC PO Box 6 Pebble Beach, CA 93950 4 001-525-022 559 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 5 001-525-021 559 Calle Principal Monterey Museum of Art PO Box 1551 Monterey, CA 93942 6 001-525-003 540 Calle Principal The House of the Four Winds Foundation PO Box 1408 Monterey, CA 93942 7 001-525-002 535 Pacific Street Monterey Masonic Temple Corporation 525 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 8 001-525-020 464 Calle Principal State of California 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 9 001-534-010 499 Pacific Street Rossman James M & Giovanna C TRS 700 Briggs 27 Pacific Grove, CA 93950 10 001-534-009 490 Calle Principal Hugo H & Linda TRS 583 Viejo Road Carmel, CA 93923 11 001-534-008 480 Calle Principal Hugo H & Linda TRS 583 Viejo Road Carmel, CA 93923 12 001-534-007 468 Calle Principal Craft Charles Nicholas TR ET AL PO Box 167 Carmel Valley, CA 93924 13 001-534-011 438 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 14 001-535-001 426 Calle Principal Casa De Calle Principal INC ET AL 426 Calle Principal, Suite 203 Monterey, CA 93940 15 001-534-001 410 Calle Principal Middlebury Institute of International Studies 460 Pierce Street Monterey, CA 93940 16 001-534-003 414 Calle Principal Professional Building of Monterey PO Box 3080 Monterey, CA 93942 17 001-534-002 201 West Franklin Street Professional Building of Monterey PO Box 3080 Monterey, CA 93942 18 001-384-003 350 Calle Principal San Carlos Associates LLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3030 Seattle, WA 98101 19 001-385-001 316 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 20 001-385-002 351 Calle Principal Redevelopment Agency of Monterey City Hall, Room 4 Monterey, CA 93940 21 001-385-004 351 Calle Principal The City of Monterey 735 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 22 001-385-0005 398 Alvarado Street Ordway Building LLC 888 Munras Avenue, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 23 001-572-017 400 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 24 001-572-025 417 Calle Principal PRI LLC 2905 Burton Drive Cambria, CA 93428 25 001-572-013 416 Alvarado Street Horvath Liza D TR & JMDJ CO 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 26 001-572-021 426 Alvarado Street FRE 553 LLC PO Box 5903 Carmel, CA 93921 27 001-572-020 432 Alvarado Street Silacci Family Investments LLC 110 John Street Salinas, CA 93901 28 001-572-010 434 Alvarado Street Teaby John E & Moraz Andrea TRS 57 Castro Road Monterey, CA 93940 29 001-572-009 440 Alvarado Street Bonifacio Plaza Associates 801 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite 109 Monterey, CA 93940 30 001-572-032 449 Calle Principal Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 31 001-572-031 449 Calle Principal Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 32 001-572-004 464 Alvarado Street Tylaer Taren TR ET AL 3987 Missouri Flat Road, STE 340-324 Placerville, CA 95667 33 001-572-003 482 Alvarado Street Songs Dental Studio Inc 499 Calle Principal, Suite 4 Monterey, CA 93940 34 001-572-018 Calle Principal (Parking) City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 35 001-571-004 Calle Principal (Parking) City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 36 001-571-002 516 Polk Street Casa Amesti Foundation 516 Polk Street Monterey, CA 93940 37 001-571-001 565 Calle Principal Callahan Wesley N TR ET AL 575 Calle Principal Monterey, CA 93940

MAILING ADDRESS
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
PART D
2023
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 13, Packet Page 73 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MAP.DWG SCALE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANS AND PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF MONTEREY NO. DATE REVISION DATE: SHEET: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CAD DWG NAME: TEL: 831.646.3921 WEBSITE: WWW.MONTEREY.ORG 580 PACIFIC STREET, MONTEREY, CA 93940 SHEET 1 OF 1 CALLE PRINCIPAL PART E MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 00-1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 00-1 - PART E - CALLE P - C1 SWJFG JFG C-1 APR 19, 2016 NOT TO SCALE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 26 28 29 31 30 32 33 34 35 36 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CALLE PRINCIPAL ALVARADO STREET

BONIFACIO PLACE

FRANKLIN STREET

DEL MONTE AVENUE

PEARL STREET
PACIFIC STREET LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY # ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER FRONTAGE (FT) 1 001-525-009 23 2 001-525-006 40 3 001-525-005 60 4 001-525-022 53.3 5 001-525-021 86.5 6 001-525-003 42 7 001-525-002 59 8 001-525-020 146.1 9 001-534-010 40.78 10 001-534-009 85.0 11 001-534-008 69.77 12 001-534-007 69.77 13 001-534-011 176.66 14 001-535-001 60 15 001-534-001 35 16 001-534-003 50 17 001-534-002 71.8 18 001-384-003 303.7 19 001-385-001 102.01 20 001-385-002 138.47 21 001-385-004 20.23 22 001-385-005 45 23 001-572-017 20.31 24 001-572-025 124.86 25 001-572-013 69.16 26 001-572-021 22.17 27 001-572-020 35.58 28 001-572-010 51 29 001-572-009 50.99 30 001-572-032 5.02 31 001-572-031 122.56 32 001-572-004 104.24 33 001-572-003 61.75 34 001-572-018 124.5 35 001-571-004 32.0 36 001-571-002 170.52 37 001-571-001 69.93

JEFFERSON STREET
POLK STREET 37

MADISON STREET
PART E
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 8., Item Page 14, Packet Page 74 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT: Receive Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 Engineer's Report; Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment; and Set Time for Public Hearing (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Receive the attached Engineer's Report;

2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment;

3. Authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presented in Part A of the Engineer’s Report; and,

4. Set a public hearing for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships. Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action continues a process the City has followed since 1986 that establishes an annual assessment to repair and maintain improvements, and to add to these improvements as necessary, to meet the original intent of the districts.

This action supports the Council’s value drivers of “working to improve the quality of life of our residents,” and “ensuring a level of economic vitality sufficient to support our quality of life and municipal infrastructure requirements” by maintaining Alvarado Street at a high standard conducive to commerce and public enjoyment of the downtown area.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 75 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Alvarado Street Maintenance District funds maintenance above and beyond normal maintenance activities, with the cost of the improvements reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels. There is a sufficient surplus in the Maintenance District’s ending balance to carry forward a credit into the FY23/24 budget. Consistent with Streets & Highways Code section 22656, a credit of $1,844.00 from the previous year’s balance will be applied to the FY 23/24 budget, and as a result, the assessment levy will be $1.57/linear foot/month.

Fees collected under this process must be for services that are over and above fees attributed to the general public. Prior to the establishment of the district, the City performed services and provided enhanced facilities in the Alvarado Street assessment area. The City established this cost and continues to pay for its "base year" maintenance costs escalated by the Consumer Price Index each year. For the next fiscal year, the City’s "base year" portion will amount to $61,042.15. In addition to the base year costs, the City will be responsible for paying for the assessments for the City-owned parcels within the district.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to proceed with the re-establishment of this District; however, that is not recommended, as the assessment pays for maintenance of improvements that contribute to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce. Failure to re-establish the District will discontinue this maintenance of improvements.

DISCUSSION:

The Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 was formed on April 11, 1985 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets & Highways Code section 22500 et seq.). The purpose of the District is to make minor improvements along the length of Alvarado Street identified in the report. All parcels that receive a special benefit have been identified and included in the report.

The staff recommendation continues a legal process, which began at the Council's meeting of February 7, 2023 when the Council ordered the preparation of the Engineer's Report to establish the annual assessment for the maintenance of Alvarado Street improvements. The Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 76 Engineer’s report separates the general benefits to the public at large from the special benefits the assessed parcels will receive. Property-based assessments may only be used to pay for the special benefits provided by the improvements and activities of a district and may not be used for general benefits. (California Constitution Art XIIID 4(a).) Therefore, the Engineer’s Report must separate and quantify the special and general benefits and assess property owners only for the portion of the costs representing special benefits.

Staff met with the Assessment District Coordinator on March 24th, 2023. At the meetings, staff presented the following recommendations:

Current Assessment District Services:
 Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning (635 hours/year, or 12.2 hours/week).
 Includes charging City administrative cost for the assessment district.  Maintains current contractual and capital outlay items.  Includes grounds maintenance, sidewalk cleanings, Assessment District Coordinator, plant material and pots, tree light maintenance and energy, and minor painting (of benches, pots, and light poles).

Members of the District recommended continuing the current level of service.

Upon receipt of the Engineer’s Report, staff recommends holding a public hearing on July 18, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. regarding the report. The approval process requires 45 days prior notice of a public hearing for this assessment. After the public hearing, if a majority protest is not received, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution certifying compliance with state law concerning the assessment and ordering that it be filed with the County Auditor's office prior to the County’s August 1, 2023 deadline. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those who are not in favor of the assessment. In other words, ballots received are weighted so that parcels proposed to have a larger assessment count more. It is not a “one parcel, one vote” proceeding. Unless a majority of the weighted ballots are in favor of the proposed assessment, the City may not impose the assessment. A majority protest exists if 50% plus one of the record owners of the parcels subject to the change submit a timely written protest. To be timely, the written protest must be submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council :

1. Receive the attached Engineer's Report;

2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessment;

3. Authorize the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presented in Part A of the Engineer’s Report; and,

4. Set a public hearing for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment.

CH/mb
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 77 Attachments: 1. Resolution with Exhibit A: Engineers Report e: Peter Cofresi, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 78 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
RECEIVING ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT; ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENT; AND SETTING TIME

FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District was established in 1985 to maintain improvements and fund beneficial improvements on Alvarado Street; WHEREAS, the cost of the improvements has been reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels according to the special benefits;
WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District has been renewed annually and has remained in effect since the establishment of the district; WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District funds maintenance, which contributes to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce; WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 22656, a credit from the previous year ending balance will be applied to this year’s assessment, which results in an assessment rate of $1.57/linear foot/month; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The Engineer’s Report ordered by Resolution No. 23-015 C.S. has been submitted to the City Council and is accepted as submitted.

2. The Engineer’s Report is filed with the City Clerk.

3. The Council hereby declares its intention to levy and collect an assessment against the properties within the Alvarado Street Maintenance District No. 85-1 as set forth in the Engineer’s Report. Said report may be referred to for further particulars.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 79 2 4. The purpose of the assessment is for maintenance of existing improvements, above and beyond ordinary maintenance. There are no new improvements or substantial changes contemplated.

5. A general description of the district boundaries is Alvarado Street between Munras Avenue and Del Monte Avenue, and Alvarado Mall between Del Monte Avenue and Custom House Plaza, City of Monterey, County of Monterey, State of California. The initial proceedings for formation of the district, on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Monterey, are referred to for a detailed description of the district boundaries and improvements.

6. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to post the necessary administrative budget adjustments to the City’s financial system so the system matches the budget total presented in Part A of the Engineer’s Report.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein and that a public hearing is set for July 18, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, City Hall, Monterey, California to consider the levy of said assessment. The assessment is subject to a majority protest voting procedure. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those who are not in favor of the assessment. Protest may be in writing only. All interested parties may also file a written report with the Clerk of the City of Monterey prior to said hearing.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 80 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2023/2024
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director, Engineer of Work for the Alvarado Street Maintenance District, City of Monterey, Monterey County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

The improvements, which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

The maintenance activities of: sidewalk cleaning, litter pickup, landscaping, and street lighting facilities installed pursuant to the Alvarado Street Improvement Assessment District.

This report consists of five parts as follows:

PART A - An estimate of the cost of the improvements.

PART B - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART C - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART D - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Part C by assessment number.

PART E - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part B by assessment number.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE
Engineer of Work

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 7, Packet Page 81 2 ENGINEER'S REPORT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: _________________ Andrea Renny, Public Works Director City of Monterey, Engineer of Work
By:_______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _____ day of ___________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Monterey, California on the ______ day of _____________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________ day of ____________, 2023.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 8, Packet Page 82 ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
Estimated Costs for FY 2023/2024
5/2/23

ACCOUNT ENGINEER'S BUDGET
Personnel
Wages $21,578.40
Benefits $10,984.35
Retirement $10,388.62
SUB TOTAL $42,951.37
Operating supplies 4205 $2,722.00
Utilities 4211 $0.00
Contractual services 4220 $57,884.00
Street lighting 4236 $3,466.00
Vehicle rental 4621 $966.00
SUB TOTAL $65,038.00
Capital outlay-Special Projects 4285 $6,125.91
SUB TOTAL $6,125.91
TOTAL $114,115.28
Reduction of Total Cost by City Share ** (61,042.15)
June 30, 2022 District Surplus Credit per S&H Code 22656 (1,844.00) $51,229.13
$1.57
Total LF of Frontage = 2713.35 LF
Contractual 4220 $6,250.00
$29,200.00
$3,600.00
$3,000.00
Tree trimming $900.00
City administrative cost $14,934.00
TOTAL $57,884.00
$3,400.00
$1,100.00
$500.00
Other District improvements $1,125.91
TOTAL $6,125.91
Basic Assessment District Cost: Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning and grounds maintenance, and allows the ability to pursue additional Capital Outlay.

Net amount to be assessed
Cost per LF/month
Sign repair
** City share for FY 20/21*CPI: $ 56,520.51*(1.08) = $ 61,042.15 CPI = 8% DEC 2022
Painting benches, pots, light
poles
Grounds maintenance
Sidewalk cleaning (16)
Assessment Dist. Coordinator
Capital Outlay - Special Projects Tree lights maintenance Landscape enhancements
PART A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 9, Packet Page 83 Assessment
Number Assessor Parcel Number Alvarado St. Frontage (ft) Percentage of Total
Alvarado St. Frontage Annual Assessment
1 001-572-019 123.83 4.56% $2,337.96
2 001-572-003 53.28 1.96% $1,005.95
3 001-572-004 111.24 4.10% $2,100.26
4 001-572-030 19.95 0.74% $376.66
5 001-572-029 52.75 1.94% $995.94
6 001-572-028 53.94 1.99% $1,018.41
7 001-572-009 52 1.92% $981.78
8 001-572-010 52.05 1.92% $982.72
9 001-572-020 25.26 0.93% $476.92
10 001-572-021 43.57 1.61% $822.62
11 001-572-013 67.5 2.49% $1,274.43
12 001-572-022 33.72 1.24% $636.65
13 001-572-025 92.8 3.42% $1,752.10
14 001-572-017 20 0.74% $377.61
15 001-385-005 31 1.14% $585.29
16 001-385-002 106.48 3.92% $2,010.38
17 001-385-001 101.72 3.75% $1,920.51
18 001-567-019 269.2 9.92% $5,082.60
19 001-567-014 380.49 14.02% $7,183.80
20 001-386-001 194.01 7.15% $3,662.99
21 001-386-002 40 1.47% $755.22
22 001-386-003 50 1.84% $944.02
23 001-388-001 70.5 2.60% $1,331.07
24 001-573-015 27.15 1.00% $512.60
25 001-573-006 86.98 3.21% $1,642.22
26 001-573-005 50 1.84% $944.02
27 001-573-003 21 0.77% $396.49
28 001-573-002 23.25 0.86% $438.97
29 001-573-012 36.25 1.34% $684.41
30 001-574-011 30 1.11% $566.41
31 001-574-028 82.6 3.04% $1,559.52
32 001-574-029 115.94 4.27% $2,188.99
33 001-574-026 34.99 1.29% $660.63
34 001-574-005 30 1.11% $566.41
35 001-574-004 19.92 0.73% $376.10
36 001-574-016 49.04 1.81% $925.89
37 001-574-012 60.94 2.25% $1,150.57
Totals 2713.35 100.00% $51,229.13
FY 23/24 Assessment will be $1.57/LF/month
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
Annual Assessment for FY 2023/2024
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 10, Packet Page 84 PART B PART C

METHOD OF ALLOCATING COSTS ON THE BASIS OF BENEFIT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The method utilized to allocate the costs associated with the benefits of the district shall be based upon lineal footage of frontage. The total cost necessary to be collected will be divided by the total frontage of the district. This will result in a cost per lineal foot. This amount will be multiplied by the lineal footage of each property frontage on Alvarado Street and Alvarado Mall.

The cost per lineal foot of frontage for the FY 2023/2024 is $1.57 per month.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 11, Packet Page 85 # APN PARCEL ADDRESS OWNER NAME
1 001-572-019 486 Alvarado Street Chyr Robert Y TR 3436 Peachwillow Lane Walnut Creek, CA 94598 2 001-572-003 482 Alvarado Street Songs Dental Studio INC 499 Calle Principal, Suite 4 Monterey, CA 93940 3 001-572-004 464 Alvarado Street Tyler Taren TR ET AL 3987 Missouri Flat Road Placerville, CA 95667 4 001-572-030 462 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 5 001-572-029 458 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 6 001-572-028 452 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 7 001-572-009 440 Alvarado Street Bonifacio Plaza Associates 801 Lighthouse Ave, Suite 109 Monterey, CA 93940 8 001-572-010 434 Alvarado Street Teaby John E & Moraz Andrea TRS 57 Castro Road Monterey, CA 93940 9 001-572-020 432 Alvarado Street Silacci Family Investment LLC 110 John Street Salinas, CA 93901 10 001-572-021 426 Alvarado Street FRE 553 LLC PO Box 5903 Carmel, CA 93921 11 001-572-013 416 Alvarado Street Horvath Liza D TR & JMDJ CO 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 12 001-572-022 414 Alvarado Street Sanchez Adobe LLC 39 Wharf No 1 Monterey, CA 93940 13 001-572-025 406 Alvarado Street PRI LLC 2905 Burton Drive Cambria, CA 93428 14 001-572-017 400 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 15 001-385-005 398 Alvarado Street Ordway Buildings LLC 888 Munras Avenue, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 16 001-385-002 351 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 17 001-385-001 316 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 18 001-567-019 2 Portola Plaza Custom House Hotel Co LTD 2 Portola Plaza Monterey, CA 93940 19 001-567-014 201 Alvarado Street Custom House Hotel Co LTD 2 Portola Plaza Monterey, CA 93940 20 001-386-001 301 Alvarado Street Paseo De Alvarado Associates PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93942 21 001-386-002 399 Alvarado Street WFC Holdings Corporation PO Box 2609 Carlsbad, CA 92018 22 001-386-003 399 Alvarado Street WFC Holdings Corporation PO Box 2609 Carlsbad, CA 92018 23 001-388-001 401 Alvarado Street 401 Alvarado LLC 101 Laurel Street San Franciso, CA 94118 24 001-573-015 409 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 25 001-573-006 417 Alvarado Street Monterey Historical Development LLC 417 Alvarado Street Monterey, CA 93940 26 001-573-005 423 Alvarado Street Lou Sim & Chhor Manhao ET AL 25459 Carmel Knolls Drive Carmel, CA 93921 27 001-573-003 429 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 28 001-573-002 435 Alvarado Street Beck Stuart B & Ivancko D TRS PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 29 001-573-012 439 Alvarado Street Davi Real Estate LLC PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 30 001-574-011 447 Bonifacio Place Old Capitol Land Company PO Box 107 Monterey, CA 93940 31 001-574-028 449 Alvarado Street NTMA 16 LP 2 Dorey Way Monterey, CA 93940 32 001-574-029 459 Alvarado Street Saucito Land Company PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 33 001-574-026 475 Alvarado Street Saucito Land Company PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 34 001-574-005 479 Alvarado Street Saucito Land Company PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 35 001-574-004 481 Alvarado Street Romeka Christina M TR ET AL PO Box 3311 Monterey, CA 93942 36 001-574-016 487 Alvarado Street Churchill Monica M TR 124 Soledad Drive Monterey, CA 93940 37 001-574-012 499 Alvarado Street ACV Associates 53 Skyline Crest Monterey, CA 93940

MAILING ADDRESS
ALVARADO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
PART D
2023
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 12, Packet Page 86 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MAP.DWG SCALE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANS AND PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF MONTEREY NO. DATE REVISION DATE: SHEET: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CAD DWG NAME: TEL: 831.646.3921 WEBSITE: WWW.MONTEREY.ORG 580 PACIFIC STREET, MONTEREY, CA 93940 SHEET 1 OF 1 ALVARADO STREET PART E MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 - PART E - ALVARADO ST - C1 SWJFG JFG C-1 APR 2, 2020 NOT TO SCALE 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 27 28 33 32 31 30 29 34 35 37 36 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 10 11 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8CALLE PRINCIPAL ALVARADO STREET TYLER STREET

BONIFACIO PLACE

FRANKLIN STREET

DEL MONTE AVENUE PEARL STREET
PACIFIC STREET ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER FRONTAGE (FT) 1 001-572-019 123.83 2 001-572-003 53.28 3 001-572-004 111.24 4 001-572-030 19.95 5 001-572-029 52.75 6 001-572-028 53.94 7 001-572-009 52.0 8 001-572-010 52.05 9 001-572-020 25.26 10 001-572-021 43.57 11 001-572-013 67.5 12 001-572-022 33.72 13 001-572-025 92.8 14 001-572-017 20 15 001-385-005 31 16 001-385-002 106.48 17 001-385-001 101.72 18 001-567-019 269.20 19 001-567-014 380.49 20 001-386-001 194.01 21 001-386-002 40 22 001-386-003 50 23 001-388-001 70.5 24 001-573-015 27.15 25 001-573-006 86.98 26 001-573-005 50 27 001-573-003 21 28 001-573-002 23.25 29 001-573-012 36.25 30 001-574-011 30 31 001-574-028 82.6 32 001-574-029 115.94 33 001-574-026 34.99 34 001-574-005 30 35 001-574-004 19.92 36 001-574-016 49.04 37 001-574-012 60.94 LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY # ASSESSMENT NUMBER PART E Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 9., Item Page 13, Packet Page 87 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Brette Neal, Human Resources Director
Prepared By: Gina Russo, Assistant Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Amending and Restating Resolution 23-004, the Salary Schedule, to Add a FullTime Police Recruit Position (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a new non-sworn, unrepresented, temporary Police Recruit classification, compensation and benefits package, and amend the full-time salary schedule.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The attached resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute a wage and benefit package for a newly created non-sworn, unrepresented temporary Police Recruit classification.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The total net cost to the City to implement the wage and benefit package during the annual budget period is $63,543. However, this is not a new cost as, the FY23/24 budget includes salaries and benefits for Police Officer positions which will remain vacant while the temporary Police Recruits are in the academy.

The rate for the recruit position is 15% below that of a police officer.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 88 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose to forego offering benefits to Police Recruits who are attending the academy, as is the practice now. This is not recommended as it inhibits our ability to attract qualified Police Officer candidates.

DISCUSSION:

Across the country, police agencies are having difficulty recruiting quality police officer candidates. The competition between law enforcement agencies to attract qualified police officer candidates has increased significantly in the last several years. The Police Department and the Human Resources Department have worked on recruitment strategies to increase police officer recruitment efforts, including standing monthly interviews, lateral incentives, and a recently adopted retention stipend. Despite the City’s recent recruitment efforts, the Police Department still has four sworn officer vacancies and expects to lose more sworn staff through attrition. To address this issue and keep the Monterey Police Department competitive in recruitment, staff recommends adding a new non-sworn, unrepresented, temporary Police Recruit classification and provide health and retirement benefits.

The Police Recruit classification is to be used while attending a California Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST)-certified basic police academy and is a temporary position, the duration for which lasts only as long as the police academy (approximately six months).

Each active Police Recruit, while attending the academy, would be provided the same health benefits that the City provides to full-time miscellaneous employees, including a contribution towards CalPERS medical benefits, employee dental and dependent vision insurance.

Each active Police Recruit, while attending the academy, would be provided the same retirement benefits that the City provides to full-time miscellaneous employees in the applicable plan, under the same provisions as outlined in the CalPERS contract.

BN/gr
Attachments: 1. Resolution with Exhibit A (Salary Schedule)

2. Attachment 1 (Job Description)
e:

Rafaela King, Finance Director
Dave Hober, Chief of Police
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 89 RESOLUTION NO. __

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12
AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION 23-004, THE SALARY SCHEDULE, TO ADD

A FULL-TIME POLICE RECRUIT POSITION
WHEREAS, the City would be better served by creating a non-sworn, unrepresented, temporary Police Recruit classification to be used while attending a California Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) basic police academy;
WHEREAS, the City would be better served by providing health and retirement benefits to Police Recruits while attending the academy;
WHEREAS, the City currently provides CalPERS Medical Benefits to full-time miscellaneous employees and would offer the same employer contribution to the flexible benefits plan on behalf of each active Police Recruit;
WHEREAS, the City currently pays for the full cost of employee dental insurance and the full cost of employee and dependent vision care insurance for full-time miscellaneous employees and would offer the same insurance coverages to each active Police Recruit; WHEREAS, the City currently provides CALPERS Miscellaneous Members Retirement for Classic and PEPRA members and would enroll active Police Recruits in the applicable plan, under the same provisions as outlined in the CalPERS contract; WHEREAS, the City would be better served by amending Resolution 23-004, the adopted Full-time Salary Schedule to establish a new single step, hourly compensation for Police Recruit which shall commence at approximately fifteen percent (15%) below that of first step Police Officer;
WHEREAS, Police Recruit position will replace the part-time Police Officer Trainee classification and salary;
WHEREAS, the Police Recruit classification is only eligible for those benefits listed herein, or as required by applicable state and federal law; WHEREAS, no changes are needed to the Position Control List in the budget as the Police Officer Recruit positions will underfill vacant Police Officer positions; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 90 2 Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the above wage and benefit package;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY to amend and restate Resolution 23-004, the Salary Schedule (Exhibit A), to add the full-time Police Recruit position (Exhibit B).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 4, Packet Page 91 City of Monterey
Full-Time and Regular Part-Time
Salary Schedule FY 22/23
Effective: 07-01-22 to 06-30-23

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 5, Packet Page 92 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (COUNC) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 8101 COUNCIL MEMBER ft counc Step: 1301 215.00 5,160.00 301 8101 MAYOR ft counc Step: 1300 338.00 8,112.00 300
oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 6, Packet Page 93 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEMEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1122 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ftconfidential Step: 5010 9,620.00 230,880.00 010 9201 CITY ATTORNEY pt contract Step: 5002 10,240.00 245,760.00 002 1101 CITY MANAGER ftcontract Step: 5001 10,893.00 261,432.00 001 1110 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ftexec Step: 5006 8,103.00 194,472.00 006 1106 FINANCE DIRECTOR ftconfidential Step: 5004 8,103.00 194,472.00 004 9200 FIRE CHIEF pt exec Step: 5 9,525.00 228,600.00 005 1112 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ftconfidential Step: 5277 8,103.00 194,472.00 277 1105 LIBRARY DIRECTOR ftexec Step: 5003 8,103.00 194,472.00 003 1292 PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR ftexec Step: 5014 8,103.00 194,472.00 014 1111 POLICE CHIEF ftexec Step: 5007 9,525.00 228,600.00 007 1116 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ftexec Step: 5009 8,808.00 211,392.00 009 oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 7, Packet Page 94 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1203 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1015 3,635.00 87,240.00 015 1203 ft mea Step: 2015 3,818.00 91,632.00
1203 ft mea Step: 3015 4,008.00 96,192.00
1203 ft mea Step: 4015 4,209.00 101,016.00
1203 ft mea Step: 5015 4,419.00 106,056.00
1207 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ft mea Step: 1200 6,875.00 165,000.00 200 1207 ft mea Step: 2200 7,237.00 173,688.00
1207 ft mea Step: 3200 7,618.00 182,832.00
1207 ft mea Step: 4200 8,019.00 192,456.00
1207 ft mea Step: 5200 8,441.00 202,584.00
1264 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1263 5,703.00 136,872.00 263 1264 ft mea Step: 2263 5,988.00 143,712.00
1264 ft mea Step: 3263 6,288.00 150,912.00
1264 ft mea Step: 4263 6,603.00 158,472.00
1264 ft mea Step: 5263 6,934.00 166,416.00
1298 ASSISTANT HR DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1370 5,703.00 136,872.00 370 1298 ft mea Step: 2370 5,988.00 143,712.00
1298 ft mea Step: 3370 6,288.00 150,912.00
1298 ft mea Step: 4370 6,603.00 158,472.00
1298 ft mea Step: 5370 6,934.00 166,416.00
1208 ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1018 4,413.00 105,912.00 018 1208 ft mea Step: 2018 4,633.00 111,192.00
1208 ft mea Step: 3018 4,865.00 116,760.00
1208 ft mea Step: 4018 5,107.00 122,568.00
1208 ft mea Step: 5018 5,362.00 128,688.00
1290 ASST DIR OF INFO RESOURCES ft mea Step: 1357 5,703.00 136,872.00 357 1290 ft mea Step: 2357 5,988.00 143,712.00
1290 ft mea Step: 3357 6,288.00 150,912.00
1290 ft mea Step: 4357 6,603.00 158,472.00
1290 ft mea Step: 5357 6,934.00 166,416.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 8, Packet Page 95 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1270 CHIEF OF INSPCT SRVC/BLDG OFF. ft mea Step: 1311 6,083.00 145,992.00 311 1270 ft mea Step: 2311 6,384.00 153,216.00
1270 ft mea Step: 3311 6,708.00 160,992.00
1270 ft mea Step: 4311 7,041.00 168,984.00
1270 ft mea Step: 5311 7,392.00 177,408.00
1221 CITY CLERK ft mea Step: 1031 4,703.00 112,872.00 031 1221 ft mea Step: 2031 4,996.00 119,904.00
1221 ft mea Step: 3031 5,291.00 126,984.00
1221 ft mea Step: 4031 5,584.00 134,016.00
1221 ft mea Step: 5031 5,878.00 141,072.00
1254 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1050 5,703.00 136,872.00 050 1254 ft mea Step: 2050 5,988.00 143,712.00
1254 ft mea Step: 3050 6,288.00 150,912.00
1254 ft mea Step: 4050 6,603.00 158,472.00
1254 ft mea Step: 5050 6,934.00 166,416.00
1266 CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL MGR ft mea Step: 1303 5,387.00 129,288.00 303 1266 ft mea Step: 2303 5,658.00 135,792.00
1266 ft mea Step: 3303 5,939.00 142,536.00
1266 ft mea Step: 4303 6,238.00 149,712.00
1266 ft mea Step: 5303 6,547.00 157,128.00
1287 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1345 4,414.00 105,936.00 345 1287 ft mea Step: 2345 4,639.00 111,336.00
1287 ft mea Step: 3345 4,868.00 116,832.00
1287 ft mea Step: 4345 5,107.00 122,568.00
1287 ft mea Step: 5345 5,362.00 128,688.00
1121 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II ft mea Step: 1037 4,567.00 109,608.00 037 1121 ft mea Step: 2037 4,795.00 115,080.00
1121 ft mea Step: 3037 5,036.00 120,864.00
1121 ft mea Step: 4037 5,286.00 126,864.00
1121 ft mea Step: 5037 5,548.00 133,152.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 2 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 9, Packet Page 96 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/ADMIN mea Step: 1 5,703.00 136,872.00 017 mea Step: 2 5,988.00 143,712.00
mea Step: 3 6,288.00 150,912.00
mea Step: 4 6,603.00 158,472.00
mea Step: 5 6,934.00 166,416.00
1247 DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/CITY ENGNR ft mea Step: 1046 6,048.00 145,152.00 046 1247 ft mea Step: 2046 6,351.00 152,424.00
1247 ft mea Step: 3046 6,668.00 160,032.00
1247 ft mea Step: 4046 6,999.00 167,976.00
1247 ft mea Step: 5046 7,351.00 176,424.00
1286 ENGINEERING PROJECTS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1344 4,413.00 105,912.00 344 1286 ft mea Step: 2344 4,633.00 111,192.00
1286 ft mea Step: 3344 4,865.00 116,760.00
1286 ft mea Step: 4344 5,107.00 122,568.00
1286 ft mea Step: 5344 5,362.00 128,688.00
4108 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS MGR. ft mea Step: 1334 4,304.00 103,296.00 334 4108 ft mea Step: 2334 4,521.00 108,504.00
4108 ft mea Step: 3334 4,741.00 113,784.00
4108 ft mea Step: 4334 4,983.00 119,592.00
4108 ft mea Step: 5334 5,234.00 125,616.00
1252 FINANCE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1294 3,635.00 87,240.00 294 1252 ft mea Step: 2294 3,818.00 91,632.00
1252 ft mea Step: 3294 4,007.00 96,168.00
1252 ft mea Step: 4294 4,209.00 101,016.00
1252 ft mea Step: 5294 4,419.00 106,056.00
1277 FINANCE MANAGER ft mea Step: 1051 5,182.00 124,368.00 051 1277 ft mea Step: 2051 5,442.00 130,608.00
1277 ft mea Step: 3051 5,714.00 137,136.00
1277 ft mea Step: 4051 6,001.00 144,024.00
1277 ft mea Step: 5051 6,294.00 151,056.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 3 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 10, Packet Page 97 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6307 FLEET MANAGER ft mea Step: 1360 4,127.00 99,048.00 360 6307 ft mea Step: 2360 4,334.00 104,016.00
6307 ft mea Step: 3360 4,550.00 109,200.00
6307 ft mea Step: 4360 4,780.00 114,720.00
6307 ft mea Step: 5360 5,019.00 120,456.00
1272 GENERAL SRVC SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1313 5,530.00 132,720.00 313 1272 ft mea Step: 2313 5,802.00 139,248.00
1272 ft mea Step: 3313 6,096.00 146,304.00
1272 ft mea Step: 4313 6,400.00 153,600.00
1272 ft mea Step: 5313 6,719.00 161,256.00
3602 GEO INFO SYS (GIS) COORDINATOR ft mea Step: 1248 3,982.00 95,568.00 248 3602 ft mea Step: 2248 4,181.00 100,344.00
3602 ft mea Step: 3248 4,390.00 105,360.00
3602 ft mea Step: 4248 4,609.00 110,616.00
3602 ft mea Step: 5248 4,840.00 116,160.00
1210 HARBORMASTER ft mea Step: 1020 5,182.00 124,368.00 020 1210 ft mea Step: 2020 5,442.00 130,608.00
1210 ft mea Step: 3020 5,714.00 137,136.00
1210 ft mea Step: 4020 6,001.00 144,024.00
1210 ft mea Step: 5020 6,294.00 151,056.00
1289 HOUSING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1368 4,127.00 99,048.00 368 1289 ft mea Step: 2368 4,334.00 104,016.00
1289 ft mea Step: 3368 4,550.00 109,200.00
1289 ft mea Step: 4368 4,780.00 114,720.00
1289 ft mea Step: 5368 5,019.00 120,456.00
1250 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST ft mea Step: 1267 3,635.00 87,240.00 267 1250 ft mea Step: 2267 3,818.00 91,632.00
1250 ft mea Step: 3267 4,008.00 96,192.00
1250 ft mea Step: 4267 4,209.00 101,016.00
1250 ft mea Step: 5267 4,419.00 106,056.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 4 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 11, Packet Page 98 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE IT NETWORK ENGINEER I mea Step: 1 4,591.60 110,198.40 380 mea Step: 2 4,819.36 115,664.64
mea Step: 3 5,056.48 121,355.52
mea Step: 4 5,313.36 127,520.64
mea Step: 5 5,573.36 133,760.64
1255 LIBRARY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1028 4,382.00 105,168.00 028 1255 ft mea Step: 2028 4,600.00 110,400.00
1255 ft mea Step: 3028 4,827.00 115,848.00
1255 ft mea Step: 4028 5,072.00 121,728.00
1255 ft mea Step: 5028 5,322.00 127,728.00
1284 NETWORK ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1338 4,413.00 105,912.00 338 1284 ft mea Step: 2338 4,633.00 111,192.00
1284 ft mea Step: 3338 4,865.00 116,760.00
1284 ft mea Step: 4338 5,107.00 122,568.00
1284 ft mea Step: 5338 5,362.00 128,688.00
1283 PARK OPERATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1337 4,127.00 99,048.00 337 1283 ft mea Step: 2337 4,334.00 104,016.00
1283 ft mea Step: 3337 4,550.00 109,200.00
1283 ft mea Step: 4337 4,780.00 114,720.00
1283 ft mea Step: 5337 5,019.00 120,456.00
1212 PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1022 5,182.00 124,368.00 022 1212 ft mea Step: 2022 5,442.00 130,608.00
1212 ft mea Step: 3022 5,714.00 137,136.00
1212 ft mea Step: 4022 6,001.00 144,024.00
1212 ft mea Step: 5022 6,294.00 151,056.00
PLANNING MANAGER mea Step: 1 5,703.00 136,872.00 025
mea Step: 2 5,988.00 143,712.00
mea Step: 3 6,288.00 150,912.00
mea Step: 4 6,603.00 158,472.00
mea Step: 5 6,934.00 166,416.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 5 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 12, Packet Page 99 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1267 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ft mea Step: 1307 4,629.00 111,096.00 307 1267 ft mea Step: 2307 4,862.00 116,688.00
1267 ft mea Step: 3307 5,103.00 122,472.00
1267 ft mea Step: 4307 5,360.00 128,640.00
1267 ft mea Step: 5307 5,627.00 135,048.00
1259 PROPERTY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1030 4,703.00 112,872.00 030 1259 ft mea Step: 2030 4,996.00 119,904.00
1259 ft mea Step: 3030 5,291.00 126,984.00
1259 ft mea Step: 4030 5,584.00 134,016.00
1259 ft mea Step: 5030 5,878.00 141,072.00
1234 PW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR pt mea Step: 1036 5,182.00 124,368.00 036 1234 pt mea Step: 2036 5,442.00 130,608.00
1234 pt mea Step: 3036 5,714.00 137,136.00
1234 pt mea Step: 4036 6,001.00 144,024.00
1234 pt mea Step: 5036 6,294.00 151,056.00
1230 RECREATION MANAGER ft mea Step: 1291 5,182.00 124,368.00 291 1230 ft mea Step: 2291 5,442.00 130,608.00
1230 ft mea Step: 3291 5,714.00 137,136.00
1230 ft mea Step: 4291 6,001.00 144,024.00
1230 ft mea Step: 5291 6,294.00 151,056.00
9205 RISK MANAGER pt mea Step: 1052 4,154.00 99,696.00 052 9205 pt mea Step: 2052 4,360.00 104,640.00
9205 pt mea Step: 3052 4,575.00 109,800.00
9205 pt mea Step: 4052 4,804.00 115,296.00
9205 pt mea Step: 5052 5,044.00 121,056.00
1263 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT ft mea Step: 1262 4,154.00 99,696.00 262 1263 ft mea Step: 2262 4,360.00 104,640.00
1263 ft mea Step: 3262 4,575.00 109,800.00
1263 ft mea Step: 4262 4,804.00 115,296.00
1263 ft mea Step: 5262 5,044.00 121,056.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 6 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 13, Packet Page 100 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1265 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1284 4,154.00 99,696.00 284 1265 ft mea Step: 2284 4,360.00 104,640.00
1265 ft mea Step: 3284 4,575.00 109,800.00
1265 ft mea Step: 4284 4,804.00 115,296.00
1265 ft mea Step: 5284 5,044.00 121,056.00
1246 SENIOR ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1256 5,268.00 126,432.00 256 1246 ft mea Step: 2256 5,546.00 133,104.00
1246 ft mea Step: 3256 5,838.00 140,112.00
1246 ft mea Step: 4256 6,145.00 147,480.00
1246 ft mea Step: 5256 6,468.00 155,232.00
SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCS ANALYST mea Step: 1 4,154.00 99,696.00 376 mea Step: 2 4,360.00 104,640.00
mea Step: 3 4,575.00 109,800.00
mea Step: 4 4,804.00 115,296.00
mea Step: 5 5,044.00 121,056.00
1258 SPORTS CENTER MANAGER ft mea Step: 1217 5,182.00 124,368.00 217 1258 ft mea Step: 2217 5,440.00 130,560.00
1258 ft mea Step: 3217 5,713.00 137,112.00
1258 ft mea Step: 4217 5,997.00 143,928.00
1258 ft mea Step: 5217 6,294.00 151,056.00
9214 STREETS & UTILITIES OPERAT MGR ft mea Step: 1363 4,127.00 99,048.00 363 9214 ft mea Step: 2363 4,334.00 104,016.00
9214 ft mea Step: 3363 4,550.00 109,200.00
9214 ft mea Step: 4363 4,780.00 114,720.00
9214 ft mea Step: 5363 5,019.00 120,456.00
1295 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1365 4,127.00 99,048.00 365 1295 ft mea Step: 2365 4,334.00 104,016.00
1295 ft mea Step: 3365 4,550.00 109,200.00
1295 ft mea Step: 4365 4,780.00 114,720.00
1295 ft mea Step: 5365 5,019.00 120,456.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 7 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 14, Packet Page 101 3/27/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MEA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1291 SYSTEMS AND NETWORK ADMIN ft mea Step: 1358 4,983.00 119,592.00 358 1291 ft mea Step: 2358 5,233.00 125,592.00
1291 ft mea Step: 3358 5,494.00 131,856.00
1291 ft mea Step: 4358 5,770.00 138,480.00
1291 ft mea Step: 5358 6,052.00 145,248.00
1253 URBAN FORESTER ft mea Step: 1321 3,821.00 91,704.00 321 1253 ft mea Step: 2321 4,013.00 96,312.00
1253 ft mea Step: 3321 4,212.00 101,088.00
1253 ft mea Step: 4321 4,422.00 106,128.00
1253 ft mea Step: 5321 4,646.00 111,504.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 8 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 15, Packet Page 102 5/5/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3310 ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR ft gem Step: 1076 3,173.00 76,152.00 076 3310 ft gem Step: 2076 3,333.00 79,992.00
3310 ft gem Step: 3076 3,501.00 84,024.00
3310 ft gem Step: 4076 3,674.00 88,176.00
3310 ft gem Step: 5076 3,857.00 92,568.00
3313 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1268 2,271.00 54,504.00 268 3313 ft gem Step: 2268 2,385.00 57,240.00
3313 ft gem Step: 3268 2,504.00 60,096.00
3313 ft gem Step: 4268 2,630.00 63,120.00
3313 ft gem Step: 5268 2,762.00 66,288.00
3320 ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1285 2,790.00 66,960.00 285 3320 ft gem Step: 2285 2,928.00 70,272.00
3320 ft gem Step: 3285 3,072.00 73,728.00
3320 ft gem Step: 4285 3,228.00 77,472.00
3320 ft gem Step: 5285 3,389.00 81,336.00
3307 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1373 2,060.00 49,440.00 373 3307 ft gem Step: 2373 2,163.00 51,912.00
3307 ft gem Step: 3373 2,271.00 54,504.00
3307 ft gem Step: 4373 2,385.00 57,240.00
3307 ft gem Step: 5373 2,504.00 60,096.00
3307 ft gem Step: 6373 2,630.00 63,120.00
3307 ft gem Step: 7373 2,762.00 66,288.00
5303 AQUATICS COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1114 3,095.00 74,280.00 114 5303 ft gem Step: 2114 3,250.00 78,000.00
5303 ft gem Step: 3114 3,413.00 81,912.00
5303 ft gem Step: 4114 3,584.00 86,016.00
5303 ft gem Step: 5114 3,762.00 90,288.00
5301 AQUATICS SPECIALIST II ft gem Step: 1302 1,941.00 46,584.00 302 5301 ft gem Step: 2302 2,037.00 48,888.00
5301 ft gem Step: 3302 2,139.00 51,336.00
5301 ft gem Step: 4302 2,246.00 53,904.00
5301 ft gem Step: 5302 2,358.00 56,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 21

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 16, Packet Page 103 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6722 ASSISTANT URBAN FORESTER ft gem Step: 1320 3,254.00 78,096.00 320 6722 ft gem Step: 2320 3,416.00 81,984.00
6722 ft gem Step: 3320 3,588.00 86,112.00
6722 ft gem Step: 4320 3,766.00 90,384.00
6722 ft gem Step: 5320 3,957.00 94,968.00
4202 ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1097 3,673.00 88,152.00 097 4202 ft gem Step: 2097 3,858.00 92,592.00
4202 ft gem Step: 3097 4,051.00 97,224.00
4202 ft gem Step: 4097 4,254.00 102,096.00
4202 ft gem Step: 5097 4,468.00 107,232.00
6301 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC ft gem Step: 1132 2,881.00 69,144.00 132 6301 ft gem Step: 2132 3,023.00 72,552.00
6301 ft gem Step: 3132 3,180.00 76,320.00
6301 ft gem Step: 4132 3,335.00 80,040.00
6301 ft gem Step: 5132 3,503.00 84,072.00
6501 BUILDING MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1135 2,677.00 64,248.00 135 6501 ft gem Step: 2135 2,810.00 67,440.00
6501 ft gem Step: 3135 2,955.00 70,920.00
6501 ft gem Step: 4135 3,096.00 74,304.00
6501 ft gem Step: 5135 3,252.00 78,048.00
6502 BUILDING MAINT. SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1136 3,408.00 81,792.00 136 6502 ft gem Step: 2136 3,580.00 85,920.00
6502 ft gem Step: 3136 3,759.00 90,216.00
6502 ft gem Step: 4136 3,945.00 94,680.00
6502 ft gem Step: 5136 4,143.00 99,432.00
6503 BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1137 2,048.00 49,152.00 137 6503 ft gem Step: 2137 2,151.00 51,624.00
6503 ft gem Step: 3137 2,258.00 54,192.00
6503 ft gem Step: 4137 2,371.00 56,904.00
6503 ft gem Step: 5137 2,489.00 59,736.00
6503 ft gem Step: 6137 2,613.00 62,712.00
6503 ft gem Step: 7137 2,744.00 65,856.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 2 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 17, Packet Page 104 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4306 BUILDING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1196 3,260.00 78,240.00 196 4306 ft gem Step: 2196 3,423.00 82,152.00
4306 ft gem Step: 3196 3,596.00 86,304.00
4306 ft gem Step: 4196 3,775.00 90,600.00
4306 ft gem Step: 5196 3,966.00 95,184.00
BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR gem Step: 1 3,023.00 72,552.00 247 gem Step: 2 3,180.00 76,320.00
gem Step: 3 3,335.00 80,040.00
gem Step: 4 3,503.00 84,072.00
gem Step: 5 3,675.00 88,200.00
6702 CEMETERY COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1157 3,095.00 74,280.00 157 6702 ft gem Step: 2157 3,250.00 78,000.00
6702 ft gem Step: 3157 3,413.00 81,912.00
6702 ft gem Step: 4157 3,584.00 86,016.00
6702 ft gem Step: 5157 3,762.00 90,288.00
6710 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1165 2,369.00 56,856.00 165 6710 ft gem Step: 2165 2,489.00 59,736.00
6710 ft gem Step: 3165 2,614.00 62,736.00
6710 ft gem Step: 4165 2,744.00 65,856.00
6710 ft gem Step: 5165 2,881.00 69,144.00
4308 CODE COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1326 3,586.00 86,064.00 326 4308 ft gem Step: 2326 3,765.00 90,360.00
4308 ft gem Step: 3326 3,954.00 94,896.00
4308 ft gem Step: 4326 4,151.00 99,624.00
4308 ft gem Step: 5326 4,361.00 104,664.00
6805 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ft gem Step: 1353 2,429.00 58,296.00 353 6805 ft gem Step: 2353 2,553.00 61,272.00
6805 ft gem Step: 3353 2,680.00 64,320.00
6805 ft gem Step: 4353 2,812.00 67,488.00
6805 ft gem Step: 5353 2,956.00 70,944.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 3 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 18, Packet Page 105 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6510 CUSTODIAN ft gem Step: 1143 1,602.00 38,448.00 143 6510 ft gem Step: 2143 1,684.00 40,416.00
6510 ft gem Step: 3143 1,767.00 42,408.00
6510 ft gem Step: 4143 1,854.00 44,496.00
6510 ft gem Step: 5143 1,950.00 46,800.00
6203 ELECTRICIAN ft gem Step: 1124 3,095.00 74,280.00 124 6203 ft gem Step: 2124 3,250.00 78,000.00
6203 ft gem Step: 3124 3,413.00 81,912.00
6203 ft gem Step: 4124 3,584.00 86,016.00
6203 ft gem Step: 5124 3,762.00 90,288.00
6727 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1343 3,173.00 76,152.00 343 6727 ft gem Step: 2343 3,333.00 79,992.00
6727 ft gem Step: 3343 3,501.00 84,024.00
6727 ft gem Step: 4343 3,674.00 88,176.00
6727 ft gem Step: 5343 3,857.00 92,568.00
6728 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1364 3,587.00 86,088.00 364 6728 ft gem Step: 2364 3,763.00 90,312.00
6728 ft gem Step: 3364 3,959.00 95,016.00
6728 ft gem Step: 4364 4,151.00 99,624.00
6728 ft gem Step: 5364 4,361.00 104,664.00
1297 ENGINEERING PROGRAMS ANALYST ft gem Step: 1040 3,673.00 88,152.00 040 1297 ft gem Step: 2040 3,858.00 92,592.00
1297 ft gem Step: 3040 4,051.00 97,224.00
1297 ft gem Step: 4040 4,254.00 102,096.00
1297 ft gem Step: 5040 4,468.00 107,232.00
6725 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1090 2,882.00 69,168.00 090 6725 ft gem Step: 2090 3,024.00 72,576.00
6725 ft gem Step: 3090 3,177.00 76,248.00
6725 ft gem Step: 4090 3,335.00 80,040.00
6725 ft gem Step: 5090 3,503.00 84,072.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 4 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 19, Packet Page 106 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1276 ENVIRONMENTAL REG ANALYST ft gem Step: 1329 3,673.00 88,152.00 329 1276 ft gem Step: 2329 3,858.00 92,592.00
1276 ft gem Step: 3329 4,051.00 97,224.00
1276 ft gem Step: 4329 4,254.00 102,096.00
1276 ft gem Step: 5329 4,468.00 107,232.00
6517 EVENT & SALES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1086 2,271.00 54,504.00 086 6517 ft gem Step: 2086 2,385.00 57,240.00
6517 ft gem Step: 3086 2,504.00 60,096.00
6517 ft gem Step: 4086 2,630.00 63,120.00
6517 ft gem Step: 5086 2,762.00 66,288.00
6507 EVENT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1140 3,095.00 74,280.00 140 6507 ft gem Step: 2140 3,250.00 78,000.00
6507 ft gem Step: 3140 3,413.00 81,912.00
6507 ft gem Step: 4140 3,584.00 86,016.00
6507 ft gem Step: 5140 3,762.00 90,288.00
6513 EVENT SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1144 3,409.00 81,816.00 144 6513 ft gem Step: 2144 3,580.00 85,920.00
6513 ft gem Step: 3144 3,759.00 90,216.00
6513 ft gem Step: 4144 3,945.00 94,680.00
6513 ft gem Step: 5144 4,143.00 99,432.00
3318 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1288 2,500.00 60,000.00 288 3318 ft gem Step: 2288 2,627.00 63,048.00
3318 ft gem Step: 3288 2,759.00 66,216.00
3318 ft gem Step: 4288 2,896.00 69,504.00
3318 ft gem Step: 5288 3,043.00 73,032.00
3324 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1289 2,767.00 66,408.00 289 3324 ft gem Step: 2289 2,904.00 69,696.00
3324 ft gem Step: 3289 3,052.00 73,248.00
3324 ft gem Step: 4289 3,204.00 76,896.00
3324 ft gem Step: 5289 3,365.00 80,760.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 5 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 20, Packet Page 107 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5209 FACILITIES MAINT. COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1305 3,673.00 88,152.00 305 5209 ft gem Step: 2305 3,858.00 92,592.00
5209 ft gem Step: 3305 4,050.00 97,200.00
5209 ft gem Step: 4305 4,254.00 102,096.00
5209 ft gem Step: 5305 4,468.00 107,232.00
6504 FACILITY ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1138 2,257.00 54,168.00 138 6504 ft gem Step: 2138 2,370.00 56,880.00
6504 ft gem Step: 3138 2,489.00 59,736.00
6504 ft gem Step: 4138 2,614.00 62,736.00
6504 ft gem Step: 5138 2,744.00 65,856.00
5205 FACILITY COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1111 3,095.00 74,280.00 111 5205 ft gem Step: 2111 3,250.00 78,000.00
5205 ft gem Step: 3111 3,413.00 81,912.00
5205 ft gem Step: 4111 3,584.00 86,016.00
5205 ft gem Step: 5111 3,762.00 90,288.00
3109 FIELD ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1172 2,184.00 52,416.00 172 3109 ft gem Step: 2172 2,293.00 55,032.00
3109 ft gem Step: 3172 2,408.00 57,792.00
3109 ft gem Step: 4172 2,529.00 60,696.00
3109 ft gem Step: 5172 2,656.00 63,744.00
FIRE PREV PLANS EXAM/INSPECTOR gem Step: 1 3,620.00 86,880.00 369 gem Step: 2 3,802.00 91,248.00
gem Step: 3 3,991.00 95,784.00
gem Step: 4 4,192.00 100,608.00
gem Step: 5 4,399.00 105,576.00
3329 FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1324 2,745.00 65,880.00 324 3329 ft gem Step: 2324 2,882.00 69,168.00
3329 ft gem Step: 3324 3,024.00 72,576.00
3329 ft gem Step: 4324 3,177.00 76,248.00
3329 ft gem Step: 5324 3,335.00 80,040.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 6 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 21, Packet Page 108 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5212 FITNESS SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1375 3,996.00 95,904.00 375 5212 ft gem Step: 2375 3,800.00 91,200.00
5212 ft gem Step: 3375 3,989.00 95,736.00
5212 ft gem Step: 4375 4,188.00 100,512.00
5212 ft gem Step: 5375 4,397.00 105,528.00
6810 FUND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1356 3,021.00 72,504.00 356 6810 ft gem Step: 2356 3,173.00 76,152.00
6810 ft gem Step: 3356 3,330.00 79,920.00
6810 ft gem Step: 4356 3,496.00 83,904.00
6810 ft gem Step: 5356 3,671.00 88,104.00
6720 GREENBELT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1115 2,664.00 63,936.00 115 6720 ft gem Step: 2115 2,798.00 67,152.00
6720 ft gem Step: 3115 2,936.00 70,464.00
6720 ft gem Step: 4115 3,088.00 74,112.00
6720 ft gem Step: 5115 3,241.00 77,784.00
GUEST SERVICE SPECIALIST gem Step: 1 2,025.00 48,600.00 372 gem Step: 2 2,128.00 51,072.00
gem Step: 3 2,235.00 53,640.00
gem Step: 4 2,346.00 56,304.00
gem Step: 5 2,462.00 59,088.00
6111 HARBOR COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1359 3,095.00 74,280.00 359 6111 ft gem Step: 2359 3,250.00 78,000.00
6111 ft gem Step: 3359 3,413.00 81,912.00
6111 ft gem Step: 4359 3,584.00 86,016.00
6111 ft gem Step: 5359 3,762.00 90,288.00
6110 HARBOR MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1269 2,677.00 64,248.00 269 6110 ft gem Step: 2269 2,810.00 67,440.00
6110 ft gem Step: 3269 2,955.00 70,920.00
6110 ft gem Step: 4269 3,096.00 74,304.00
6110 ft gem Step: 5269 3,252.00 78,048.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 7 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 22, Packet Page 109 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6102 HARBOR MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1186 2,881.00 69,144.00 186 6102 ft gem Step: 2186 3,023.00 72,552.00
6102 ft gem Step: 3186 3,180.00 76,320.00
6102 ft gem Step: 4186 3,335.00 80,040.00
6102 ft gem Step: 5186 3,503.00 84,072.00
6105 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER ft gem Step: 1120 2,429.00 58,296.00 120 6105 ft gem Step: 2120 2,551.00 61,224.00
6105 ft gem Step: 3120 2,681.00 64,344.00
6105 ft gem Step: 4120 2,813.00 67,512.00
6105 ft gem Step: 5120 2,956.00 70,944.00
4208 HCD COORDINATOR-PROJ &PROGRAMS ft gem Step: 1230 3,268.00 78,432.00 230 4208 ft gem Step: 2230 3,430.00 82,320.00
4208 ft gem Step: 3230 3,602.00 86,448.00
4208 ft gem Step: 4230 3,783.00 90,792.00
4208 ft gem Step: 5230 3,972.00 95,328.00
6512 HISTORIC FAC. SR. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1203 3,017.00 72,408.00 203 6512 ft gem Step: 2203 3,170.00 76,080.00
6512 ft gem Step: 3203 3,331.00 79,944.00
6512 ft gem Step: 4203 3,499.00 83,976.00
6512 ft gem Step: 5203 3,671.00 88,104.00
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT gem Step: 1 2,184.00 52,416.00 335 gem Step: 2 2,293.00 55,032.00
gem Step: 3 2,408.00 57,792.00
gem Step: 4 2,529.00 60,696.00
gem Step: 5 2,656.00 63,744.00
HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR gem Step: 1 3,095.00 74,280.00 361 gem Step: 2 3,250.00 78,000.00
gem Step: 3 3,413.00 81,912.00
gem Step: 4 3,584.00 86,016.00
gem Step: 5 3,762.00 90,288.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 8 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 23, Packet Page 110 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3322 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1280 2,790.00 66,960.00 280 3322 ft gem Step: 2280 2,928.00 70,272.00
3322 ft gem Step: 3280 3,072.00 73,728.00
3322 ft gem Step: 4280 3,228.00 77,472.00
3322 ft gem Step: 5280 3,389.00 81,336.00
4307 HVAC SENIOR TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1306 3,112.00 74,688.00 306 4307 ft gem Step: 2306 3,269.00 78,456.00
4307 ft gem Step: 3306 3,430.00 82,320.00
4307 ft gem Step: 4306 3,603.00 86,472.00
4307 ft gem Step: 5306 3,783.00 90,792.00
3107 INFORMATION TECH SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1378 3,095.00 74,280.00 378 3107 ft gem Step: 2378 3,250.00 78,000.00
3107 ft gem Step: 3378 3,414.00 81,936.00
3107 ft gem Step: 4378 3,584.00 86,016.00
3107 ft gem Step: 5378 3,762.00 90,288.00
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST gem Step: 1 3,673.00 88,152.00 377 gem Step: 2 3,858.00 92,592.00
gem Step: 3 4,051.00 97,224.00
gem Step: 4 4,254.00 102,096.00
gem Step: 5 4,468.00 107,232.00
4301 INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1100 3,587.00 86,088.00 100 4301 ft gem Step: 2100 3,763.00 90,312.00
4301 ft gem Step: 3100 3,959.00 95,016.00
4301 ft gem Step: 4100 4,151.00 99,624.00
4301 ft gem Step: 5100 4,361.00 104,664.00
3206 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER I ft gem Step: 1255 3,532.00 84,768.00 069 3206 ft gem Step: 2255 3,710.00 89,040.00
3206 ft gem Step: 3255 3,895.00 93,480.00
3206 ft gem Step: 4255 4,090.00 98,160.00
3206 ft gem Step: 5255 4,296.00 103,104.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 9 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 24, Packet Page 111 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3609 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER II ft gem Step: 1038 4,243.00 101,832.00 038 3609 ft gem Step: 2038 4,455.00 106,920.00
3609 ft gem Step: 3038 4,678.00 112,272.00
3609 ft gem Step: 4038 4,911.00 117,864.00
3609 ft gem Step: 5038 5,156.00 123,744.00
IT APPLICATION ENGINEER III gem Step: 1 4,590.00 110,160.00 080 gem Step: 2 4,819.00 115,656.00
gem Step: 3 5,060.00 121,440.00
gem Step: 4 5,313.00 127,512.00
gem Step: 5 5,576.00 133,824.00
6508 LAUNDRY ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1250 1,165.00 27,960.00 250 6508 ft gem Step: 2250 1,226.00 29,424.00
6508 ft gem Step: 3250 1,284.00 30,816.00
6508 ft gem Step: 4250 1,351.00 32,424.00
6508 ft gem Step: 5250 1,414.00 33,936.00
6518 LEAD CUSTODIAN ft gem Step: 1142 2,256.80 54,163.20 142 6518 ft gem Step: 2142 2,370.16 56,883.84
6518 ft gem Step: 3142 2,488.72 59,729.28
6518 ft gem Step: 4142 2,613.52 62,724.48
6518 ft gem Step: 5142 2,743.52 65,844.48
6304 LEAD MECHANIC ft gem Step: 1254 3,023.00 72,552.00 254 6304 ft gem Step: 2254 3,180.00 76,320.00
6304 ft gem Step: 3254 3,335.00 80,040.00
6304 ft gem Step: 4254 3,503.00 84,072.00
6304 ft gem Step: 5254 3,675.00 88,200.00
3316 LEGAL SECRETARY ft gem Step: 1078 2,500.00 60,000.00 078 3316 ft gem Step: 2078 2,627.00 63,048.00
3316 ft gem Step: 3078 2,759.00 66,216.00
3316 ft gem Step: 4078 2,896.00 69,504.00
3316 ft gem Step: 5078 3,043.00 73,032.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 10 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 25, Packet Page 112 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5101 LIBRARIAN ft gem Step: 1104 2,962.00 71,088.00 104 5101 ft gem Step: 2104 3,108.00 74,592.00
5101 ft gem Step: 3104 3,265.00 78,360.00
5101 ft gem Step: 4104 3,426.00 82,224.00
5101 ft gem Step: 5104 3,597.00 86,328.00
3101 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1063 2,082.00 49,968.00 063 3101 ft gem Step: 2063 2,185.00 52,440.00
3101 ft gem Step: 3063 2,294.00 55,056.00
3101 ft gem Step: 4063 2,410.00 57,840.00
3101 ft gem Step: 5063 2,530.00 60,720.00
3102 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1064 2,271.00 54,504.00 064 3102 ft gem Step: 2064 2,385.00 57,240.00
3102 ft gem Step: 3064 2,504.00 60,096.00
3102 ft gem Step: 4064 2,630.00 63,120.00
3102 ft gem Step: 5064 2,762.00 66,288.00
3104 LIBRARY ASSISTANT III ft gem Step: 1066 2,404.00 57,696.00 066 3104 ft gem Step: 2066 2,526.00 60,624.00
3104 ft gem Step: 3066 2,653.00 63,672.00
3104 ft gem Step: 4066 2,785.00 66,840.00
3104 ft gem Step: 5066 2,926.00 70,224.00
6718 MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1299 2,170.00 52,080.00 299 6718 ft gem Step: 2299 2,279.00 54,696.00
6718 ft gem Step: 3299 2,393.00 57,432.00
6718 ft gem Step: 4299 2,510.00 60,240.00
6718 ft gem Step: 5299 2,637.00 63,288.00
6109 MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1216 2,709.00 65,016.00 216 6109 ft gem Step: 2216 2,845.00 68,280.00
6109 ft gem Step: 3216 2,985.00 71,640.00
6109 ft gem Step: 4216 3,136.00 75,264.00
6109 ft gem Step: 5216 3,293.00 79,032.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 11 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 26, Packet Page 113 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3328 MARINA HARBOR ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1298 2,878.00 69,072.00 298 3328 ft gem Step: 2298 3,020.00 72,480.00
3328 ft gem Step: 3298 3,174.00 76,176.00
3328 ft gem Step: 4298 3,332.00 79,968.00
3328 ft gem Step: 5298 3,500.00 84,000.00
MEDIA SPECIALIST gem Step: 1 2,184.00 52,416.00 094
gem Step: 2 2,293.00 55,032.00
gem Step: 3 2,408.00 57,792.00
gem Step: 4 2,529.00 60,696.00
gem Step: 5 2,656.00 63,744.00
MEDICAL RECORDS ASSISTANT gem Step: 1 2,184.00 52,416.00 711 gem Step: 2 2,293.00 55,032.00
gem Step: 3 2,408.00 57,792.00
gem Step: 4 2,529.00 60,696.00
gem Step: 5 2,656.00 63,744.00
6515 OPERATIONS COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1322 3,095.00 74,280.00 322 6515 ft gem Step: 2322 3,250.00 78,000.00
6515 ft gem Step: 3322 3,413.00 81,912.00
6515 ft gem Step: 4322 3,584.00 86,016.00
6515 ft gem Step: 5322 3,762.00 90,288.00
6506 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1139 3,409.00 81,816.00 139 6506 ft gem Step: 2139 3,580.00 85,920.00
6506 ft gem Step: 3139 3,759.00 90,216.00
6506 ft gem Step: 4139 3,945.00 94,680.00
6506 ft gem Step: 5139 4,143.00 99,432.00
6703 PARK ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1158 2,429.00 58,296.00 158 6703 ft gem Step: 2158 2,553.00 61,272.00
6703 ft gem Step: 3158 2,680.00 64,320.00
6703 ft gem Step: 4158 2,812.00 67,488.00
6703 ft gem Step: 5158 2,956.00 70,944.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 12 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 27, Packet Page 114 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6704 PARK MAINTENANCE CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1194 2,489.00 59,736.00 194 6704 ft gem Step: 2194 2,614.00 62,736.00
6704 ft gem Step: 3194 2,744.00 65,856.00
6704 ft gem Step: 4194 2,881.00 69,144.00
6704 ft gem Step: 5194 3,023.00 72,552.00
6705 PARK MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1160 2,743.00 65,832.00 160 6705 ft gem Step: 2160 2,880.00 69,120.00
6705 ft gem Step: 3160 3,020.00 72,480.00
6705 ft gem Step: 4160 3,171.00 76,104.00
6705 ft gem Step: 5160 3,333.00 79,992.00
6701 PARK MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1156 3,173.00 76,152.00 156 6701 ft gem Step: 2156 3,333.00 79,992.00
6701 ft gem Step: 3156 3,501.00 84,024.00
6701 ft gem Step: 4156 3,674.00 88,176.00
6701 ft gem Step: 5156 3,857.00 92,568.00
6706 PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1161 2,048.00 49,152.00 161 6706 ft gem Step: 2161 2,151.00 51,624.00
6706 ft gem Step: 3161 2,258.00 54,192.00
6706 ft gem Step: 4161 2,371.00 56,904.00
6706 ft gem Step: 5161 2,489.00 59,736.00
6706 ft gem Step: 6161 2,613.00 62,712.00
6706 ft gem Step: 7161 2,744.00 65,856.00
6606 PARKING CONTROLS TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1274 2,826.00 67,824.00 274 6606 ft gem Step: 2274 2,966.00 71,184.00
6606 ft gem Step: 3274 3,113.00 74,712.00
6606 ft gem Step: 4274 3,273.00 78,552.00
6606 ft gem Step: 5274 3,434.00 82,416.00
6601 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ft gem Step: 1145 2,429.00 58,296.00 145 6601 ft gem Step: 2145 2,553.00 61,272.00
6601 ft gem Step: 3145 2,680.00 64,320.00
6601 ft gem Step: 4145 2,812.00 67,488.00
6601 ft gem Step: 5145 2,956.00 70,944.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 13 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 28, Packet Page 115 5/5/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6605 PARKING ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1149 3,408.00 81,792.00 149 6605 ft gem Step: 2149 3,580.00 85,920.00
6605 ft gem Step: 3149 3,759.00 90,216.00
6605 ft gem Step: 4149 3,945.00 94,680.00
6605 ft gem Step: 5149 4,143.00 99,432.00
6615 PARKING MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1159 2,881.00 69,144.00 159 6615 ft gem Step: 2159 3,023.00 72,552.00
6615 ft gem Step: 3159 3,180.00 76,320.00
6615 ft gem Step: 4159 3,335.00 80,040.00
6615 ft gem Step: 5159 3,503.00 84,072.00
6604 PARKING MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1148 3,408.00 81,792.00 148 6604 ft gem Step: 2148 3,580.00 85,920.00
6604 ft gem Step: 3148 3,759.00 90,216.00
6604 ft gem Step: 4148 3,945.00 94,680.00
6604 ft gem Step: 5148 4,143.00 99,432.00
6608 PARKING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1151 2,048.00 49,152.00 151 6608 ft gem Step: 2151 2,151.00 51,624.00
6608 ft gem Step: 3151 2,258.00 54,192.00
6608 ft gem Step: 4151 2,371.00 56,904.00
6608 ft gem Step: 5151 2,489.00 59,736.00
6608 ft gem Step: 6151 2,613.00 62,712.00
6608 ft gem Step: 7151 2,744.00 65,856.00
6616 PARKING SERVICES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1116 3,676.00 88,224.00 116 6616 ft gem Step: 2116 3,858.00 92,592.00
6616 ft gem Step: 3116 4,050.00 97,200.00
6616 ft gem Step: 4116 4,254.00 102,096.00
6616 ft gem Step: 5116 4,468.00 107,232.00
6617 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV ft gem Step: 1117 2,258.00 54,192.00 117 6617 ft gem Step: 2117 2,371.00 56,904.00
6617 ft gem Step: 3117 2,489.00 59,736.00
6617 ft gem Step: 4117 2,613.00 62,712.00
6617 ft gem Step: 5117 2,744.00 65,856.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 14 of 21

CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (GEM)
Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 29, Packet Page 116
5







  


  


 


 $







  




!

! 


  


!
"






  








"


  


#

"

#



  





"!
"


 $



# $  




 


"" 

  


!

#


  


!#
!
!

  


#

#!



  





!


 

$  




"

#
!
 

  





!#

  


#"!

!
 

  


#

 





  


##


"


 

'
  






!
 

  





!
#
!#
"!

  



#


!!

#

  


#
#

#
#

  




#



!
"
  

 



"  




 
""


  
  





"
"
!

!

  



#


!

#
  


#
#

#


!
  




#
#"



 


  





"

## 
  







  






#

# 


  


"




#
  


#

!
  


#

 



  






""
) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



 $!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 30, Packet Page 117
5







  


  


 
  





!

  




#



"" 

  


""

!
"
  





#



  


#




#"
  



"
#

 


# $


   





"
#"  

  





#
!
"

!

  




 
"
#


  


#

"

!
"#

  





! 
!





%
  


   




"
"
"" 

  





 
!



  




!
!
!



  


#
#


!!

#

  




#

#
#
 

 
   




!

#

"  
  



"

  




# 
"
!

  


#

"#
"

  







!

""
 




  








## 
  


 



  


#


  


#

##

"


  




##
 



  






"
!# 
  





"
!


  




!"!
!

 
  


#
#
""




  




#
!


"
) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



 %!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 31, Packet Page 118
5







  


  


 

$



  




" 
#
!
 
 


"




 


!
#

"!
 


#

#
#
#!
 


!
"







 
   




!

#

" 


 



"



 




# 
"
!



 


#

"#
"



 







!

""








  



#

#
!

 

  




#



#
#

  



#
# 

#""

  


#
#



##

  




#
"!












   






!
 

  





!
#
!#
"!

  



#


!!

#

  


#
#

#
#

  




#



!
"





# $  







#" 

  







"

  





!
!##

  


#

#!!
"
!

  






""
#






 
  




"# 
##

 


 





!

#
##


 


 
#"
!



 


#

 



#


 


##

"

) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



 &!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 32, Packet Page 119
5







  


  


 






%
  




" 

!
 

  


!




"

  










  


#

!




  





" 
"
!






 

!


  




##
"


" 


  





!
"
"


  




"
!



  


#

!!
!



  




#
!






 $

!  







#" 
  







"
  





!
!##
  


#

#!!
"
!
  






""
#




$


# $  




#"!

!
  


  


#


 

  


##


"


  


#

""
!
##

  















$

  

!"  




!

#

" 


  



"



  




##
"
! 


  


#

"

"
#


  







!

""





$

 "

  




" 

!
 

  


!




"


  







"#


  


#




"


  





" 
"
!

) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



 '!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 33, Packet Page 120
5







  


  


 






$  





#

#" 


  


"

##

  


!



!


  


#

!
#
#

  



"
#"



 





!"  




""

!
" 
  






#



  







#"
  


#


"
#
  


 
"#










# $


   




"
"
""  


 





 
!




 




!
!
!




 


#
#


!!

#


 




#

#
#








"
# $  




#"!

!
  



 


#


 


 


##


"



 


#

""
!
##


 















# $  





#

#" 

  


"

##

  


!



!


  


#

!
#
#

  



"
#"




 
   




!

#
# 

 











 


"

"
"
 


#

##
"

#
 






"
""
) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



 (!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 34, Packet Page 121
/5







  


  


 







 
   




# 


#
 
  


!"
!



  




##
"
 
  


#

 
"

""
  





"

!
"


 

 
   




!

#

" 

 



"


 




# 
"
!


 


#

"#
"


 







!

""




&






  








 


 





 






 





!
!!



 


#


"#

#


 





#
""






# $  




# 


"
 

  


""
!



  








#"

  


#



#

  






!
!!






# $  




#"
#!


 

  







#

  


"

#
!


  


#




!#

  


#"!

!
 

  




 





  




##


"







%


  




 



 

  






!
!!

  



"#

#
  


#

#
""

  





"

!

"
) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



!)!

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 35, Packet Page 122
5







  


  


 
 !  %


"



  




!

! 
  


!
"




  








"
  


#

"

#

  





"!
"

) $*+
,-./0*.$

&
 



! !

 










(GEM)








EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 36, Packet Page 123 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MFCOA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2205 ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF ft fma Step: 1325 7,537.00 180,888.00 325 2205 ft fma Step: 2325 7,911.00 189,864.00
2205 ft fma Step: 3325 8,310.00 199,440.00
2205 ft fma Step: 4325 8,725.00 209,400.00
2205 ft fma Step: 5325 9,160.00 219,840.00
1209 DIVISION CHIEF ft fma Step: 1019 6,429.00 154,296.00 019 1209 ft fma Step: 2019 6,751.00 162,024.00
1209 ft fma Step: 3019 7,089.00 170,136.00
1209 ft fma Step: 4019 7,442.00 178,608.00
1209 ft fma Step: 5019 7,815.00 187,560.00
oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 37, Packet Page 124 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (PLMA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6724 ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF ft plma Step: 1340 7,463.00 179,112.00 340 6724 ft plma Step: 2340 7,835.00 188,040.00
6724 ft plma Step: 3340 8,228.00 197,472.00
6724 ft plma Step: 4340 8,639.00 203,336.00
6724 ft plma Step: 5340 9,071.00 217,704.00
1214 POLICE LIEUTENANT ft plma Step: 1024 6,476.00 155,424.00 024 1214 ft plma Step: 2024 6,800.00 163,200.00
1214 ft plma Step: 3024 7,144.00 171,456.00
1214 ft plma Step: 4024 7,501.00 180,024.00
1214 ft plma Step: 5024 7,874.00 188,976.00
oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 38, Packet Page 125 2/23/2023 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MFFA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2204 DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL ft mffa Step: 1209 4,741.00 113,784.00 209 2204 ft mffa Step: 2209 4,978.00 119,472.00
2204 ft mffa Step: 3209 5,228.00 125,472.00
2204 ft mffa Step: 4209 5,485.00 131,640.00
2204 ft mffa Step: 5209 5,760.00 138,240.00
2201 FIRE CAPTAIN ft mffa Step: 1059 4,514.00 108,336.00 059 2201 ft mffa Step: 2059 4,739.00 113,736.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 3059 4,976.00 119,424.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 4059 5,222.00 125,328.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 5059 5,484.00 131,616.00
2203 FIRE ENGINEER ft mffa Step: 1060 3,898.00 93,552.00 060 2203 ft mffa Step: 2060 4,092.00 98,208.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 3060 4,298.00 103,152.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 4060 4,514.00 108,336.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 5060 4,739.00 113,736.00
2206 FIREFIGHTER ft mffa Step: 1062 3,535.00 84,840.00 062 2206 ft mffa Step: 2062 3,711.00 89,064.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 3062 3,898.00 93,552.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 4062 4,092.00 98,208.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 5062 4,298.00 103,152.00
oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 39, Packet Page 126 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (MPA) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2103 POLICE OFFICER ft mpa Step: 1057 4,183.00 100,392.00 057 2103 ft mpa Step: 2057 4,392.00 105,408.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 3057 4,615.00 110,760.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 4057 4,841.00 116,184.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 5057 5,081.00 121,944.00
2105 POLICE SERGEANT ft mpa Step: 1058 5,106.00 122,544.00 058 2105 ft mpa Step: 2058 5,359.00 128,616.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 3058 5,629.00 135,096.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 4058 5,909.00 141,816.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 5058 6,210.00 149,040.00
oll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch-Annual2.rpt Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 40, Packet Page 127 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (RPT) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9373 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT rpt rpt 673Step: 1 26.22 673
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 2 27.53
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 3 28.91
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 4 30.36
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 5 31.89
9329 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT rpt rpt 643Step: 1 23.77 643 9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 2 24.96
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 3 26.21
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 4 27.53
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 5 28.91
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 6 30.36
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 7 31.89
9999 AQUATICS SPECIALIST I ptrpt 000Step: 1 18.69 475
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 2 19.62
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 3 20.61
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 4 21.64
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 5 22.75
9534 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST rpt rpt 485Step: 1 26.22 485
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 2 27.53
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 3 28.90
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 4 30.35
9534 rpt rpt 485Step: 5 31.87
CULTURAL ARTS ASSISTANT rpt Step: 1 25.21 639
rpt Step: 2 26.47
rpt Step: 3 27.80
rpt Step: 4 29.19
rpt Step: 5 30.66
ayroll\402-01-Payroll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 41, Packet Page 128 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (RPT) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9339 CUSTODIAN rpt rpt 471Step: 1 18.47 471
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 2 19.42
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 3 20.38
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 4 21.41
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 5 22.50
9664 FACILITY ATTENDANT rpt rpt 545Step: 1 26.02 545
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 2 27.35
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 3 28.69
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 4 30.13
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 5 31.62
9615 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER rpt rpt 713Step: 1 28.04 713 9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 2 29.42
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 3 30.91
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 4 32.44
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 5 34.07
LAUNDRY ATTENDANT rpt Step: 1 13.48 580
rpt Step: 2 14.11
rpt Step: 3 14.84
rpt Step: 4 15.54
rpt Step: 5 16.32
9526 LEAD PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR rpt rpt 525Step: 1 22.44 525 9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 2 23.54
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 3 24.73
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 4 25.97
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 5 27.25
9515 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I rpt rpt 547Step: 1 24.97 547
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 2 26.24
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 3 27.53
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 4 28.93
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 5 30.36
ayroll\402-01-Payroll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 2 of 4

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 42, Packet Page 129 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (RPT) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9513 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II rpt rpt 548Step: 1 26.24 548
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 2 27.53
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 3 28.91
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 4 30.36
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 5 31.89
9524 LIFEGUARD rpt rpt 492Step: 1 15.17 492
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 2 15.86
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 3 16.70
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 4 17.52
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 5 18.40
9665 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER rpt rpt 482Step: 1 28.04 482 9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 2 29.42
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 3 30.91
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 4 32.44
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 5 34.07
9662 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV rpt rpt 714Step: 1 26.05 714 9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 2 27.36
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 3 28.71
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 4 30.14
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 5 31.66
9518 PHYSICAL THERAPIST rpt rpt 535Step: 1 47.48 535
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 2 49.86
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 3 52.36
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 4 54.96
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 5 57.71
9528 RECREATION SPECIALIST rpt rpt 476Step: 1 24.29 476 9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 2 25.51
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 3 26.79
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 4 28.12
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 5 29.56
ayroll\402-01-Payroll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 3 of 4

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 43, Packet Page 130 12/13/2022 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE (RPT) Effective 7/01/2022 Through 6/30/2023
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9519 SITE DIRECTOR/AFTERSCHOOL rpt rpt 513Step: 1 16.93 513 9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 2 17.78
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 3 18.67
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 4 19.59
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 5 20.59
TOT ACTIVITY LEADER rpt Step: 1 16.93 491
rpt Step: 2 17.78
rpt Step: 3 18.67
rpt Step: 4 19.59
rpt Step: 5 20.59
9716 WHARF ATTENDANT rpt rpt 707Step: 1 25.06 707
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 2 26.29
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 3 27.60
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 4 28.98
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 5 30.43
ayroll\402-01-Payroll General Info\CRYSTAL REPORTS\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 4 of 4

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 44, Packet Page 131

EXHIBIT B

CLASS SPECIFICATION

POLICE OFFICER - RECRUIT
DEPARTMENT: Police DATE: May 2023
SALARY GROUP: Full-Time
FLSA Status: Non-Exempt
SUMMARY: Under close supervision, incumbents attend structured police academy classes in order to obtain a California Peace Officer Standards and Training (P.O.S.T) Certificate and perform other related work as is required.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: The job class of Police Officer - Recruit is a non-sworn, trainee level position. Incumbents appointed to the job class of Police Officer - Recruit are full-time police academy students with the sole intended purpose of graduating in order to meet the requirements for a California P.O.S.T. Certificate.

Incumbents in this position are non-sworn at-will employees and ineligible for inclusion under Labor Code Section 4850. Failure to graduate from an approved police academy and/or failure to meet the City of Monterey Police Department standards shall be cause for release from this position.

This class is distinguished from the next higher level class of Police Officer in that the latter must have successfully graduated from a California P.O.S.T. approved police academy; or possess a valid California Basic POST Certificate.

Upon graduation from the police academy, incumbents will be appointed and sworn in as a Police Officer.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: Essential functions, as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act, may include any of the following representative duties, knowledge, and skills. Factors such as regular attendance at the job are not routinely listed in job descriptions, but are an essential function. Essential duties and responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following:
 Attends the Basic Peace Officers Academy, maintaining at least minimum levels of proficiency at all levels of training.
 Completes introduction and indoctrination training which may include assignments to various divisions within the Police Department.
 Successfully pass a complete background/suitability process, which includes a polygraph examination, psychological examination and medical examination  Attend classes in daytime hours, evenings, and weekends  May attend a live-in approved police academy
 Maintain confidentiality of work-related issues and City information.  Perform other job-related duties within the scope of this job classification as assigned.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 45, Packet Page 132 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS:

Skill in:
 Read and comprehend complex manuals, reports and statutes  Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, proper use of words, sentence structure and paragraph construction
 Write comprehensive narrative reports that detail events that have occurred (i.e., incident reports)  Develop skill in the use of firearms and other equipment as issued  Communicate orally with all age, social and educational levels and ethnic groups in the community  Use tact, logical reasoning and sensitivity when dealing with problems of the general public  Adopt quick, effective and reasonable courses of action under emergency conditions  Understand and carry out oral and written instructions  Observe and remember factual descriptions and information  Physical agility – running, pushups, sit-ups, obstacle course, and jumping a 6’ wall  Ability to drive a vehicle in slow speed maneuvers and pursuit operations  Ability to apply learning domain content to various police-related scenarios MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:

Pursuant to Section 1031 of the California Government Code, positions in this class must meet the minimum requirements established for Peace Officers.
 Citizen of the United States or a permanent resident alien who is eligible for and has applied for citizenship
 Must be at least 21 years of age at the date of appointment  No felony convictions
 Meet requirements under the California P.O.S.T. medical criteria prior to appointment Education: Possess a high school diploma or GED (If GED, a total standard score of 225 or higher, with no single score under 40).

LICENSE AND CERTIFICATION:
● Must possess a valid California Driver’s License upon the time of appointment and be insurable with the City’s standard insurance rate, unless otherwise approved by appointing authority.

MENTAL EVALUATION:
 Police Office Recruits will be evaluated by a doctor and must be found to be free from any physical, emotional, or mental condition that might adversely affect the exercise of the powers of a peace officer; This includes whether the candidate has a bias against race or ethnicity, gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 46, Packet Page 133 PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT:

Physical Demands
● Standing & Walking – Standing for extended periods of time and/or walking distances (1 or more miles).
● Lifting - Ability to safely lift over to 50 pounds; use proper lifting techniques including bending at the knees. This position may be required to lift and carry victims. ● Climbing - Ability to ascend 10 ft. or more up ladder(s). ● Manual Dexterity - The ability to perform multiple work activities requiring a significant level of physical and mental coordination, such as use and control of firearms, repeatedly moving in and out of a vehicle, computer keyboarding and writing..
● Visual - Acuity for driving long periods; reading literature for long periods; industry warning signs and instruments; reading maps and diagrams, computer screen. ● Hearing and Speech – Must be able to hear a variety of warning devices including alarms, gas leaks or calls for help; ability to communicate in person, before groups and over the telephone. ● Mobility - Ability to operate a motor vehicle, and reach, push, pull, stoop, bend, and squat. ● Reflexes - Ability to quickly and automatically respond to emergency and safety situations. ● Other physical requirements as described the P.O.S.T. Medical Screening Manual.

Environmental Elements
Incumbents work outdoors in all weather conditions, around loud siren noise, moving vehicles, and around animals; exposed to controlled temperature conditions in an office environment and unpredictable work conditions, including but not limited to, physical threats, verbal abuse, and stressful situations when in the field.

This position may require working around chemicals, blood, and other potential toxic exposures.

DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS
All City of Monterey employees are designated Disaster Service Workers through state and local law (California Government Code Section 3100-3109). Employment with the City requires the affirmation of a loyalty oath to this effect. Employees are required to complete all Disaster Service Worker-related training as assigned, and to return to work as ordered in the event of an emergency.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 10., Item Page 47, Packet Page 134 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 1187 Del Monte Avenue (Mohr Imports); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Adam Mohr (Mohr Imported Cars, Inc.); Under Negotiation:

Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction for terms and conditions for a lease extension.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply since there is no disposition as defined under the Act.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 135 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding the proposed lease extension.

DISCUSSION:

Mohr Imported Cars, Inc. is a classic and sports car auto broker and has been a tenant of the City at this location since June 2011. The current lease commenced June 1, 2011, and is scheduled to expire May 31, 2023. The initial lease term was two (2) years with one (1) oneyear option to extend, which was exercised. The lease rolled over to a month-to-month at-will status on June 1, 2014. The negotiation process with Mohr Motors over the following two years was extensive. The lease was extended effective June 1, 2016 for five (5) years and the tenant was provided an option to renew for two (2) years, which was exercised. The lease is scheduled to expire May 31, 2023 and the tenant requested to extend the lease. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/
e: Adam Mohr, Mohr Imported Cars, Inc.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 136 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 290 Figueroa Street (Dust Bowl Brewing Co. Tap Depot); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Brett Honore and Brett Tate (Dust Bowl Brewing Co., LLC); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction for terms and conditions for a lease extension.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply since there is no disposition as defined under the Act.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 137 this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding the proposed lease extension.

DISCUSSION:

The 10-year lease for 290 Figueroa Street was entered into between the City and Tanimura & Antle Value-Added, LLC (“T & A”) for retail space that consisted of a fresh market, seafood counter and deli. The lease was assigned on November 2, 2018 from T & A to Dust Bowl Brewing Co., LLC (“Dust Bowl”) and is scheduled to expire July 31, 2023. Dust Bowl transformed the space from its previous use to a tap room featuring 24 beers on tap, retail sales of prepackaged beer to-go, a resident food truck, Dust Bowl merchandise for sale, and an outdoor patio area with fire pits, picnic tables, and cornhole.

Dust Bowl’s flagship Turlock location consists of 30,000 square feet. The expansion of the business to Monterey in 2018 has been very successful and Dust Bowl enjoys a loyal customer base. They have recently expanded into Elk Grove and Livermore.

Dust Bowl has requested to extend the current lease. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/
e: Brett Honore, Dust Bowl Brewing Co.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 138 Brett Tate, Dust Bowl Brewing Co.

Karen Tate, Dust Bowl Brewing Co.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 139 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Receive Mayor’s Recommendations and Make Appointments to the Architectural Review Committee, Building and Housing Appeals Board, Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee, and Planning Commission (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council receive a recommendation from Mayor Williamson and appoint Kimberly Turgen to the vacant seat on the Architectural Review Committee, William Pyzel to the vacant seat on the Building and Housing Appeals Board, Jeff White to the vacant Alternate seat on the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee representing the Del Monte Beach neighborhood, Natalia G. Tjandra to the vacant Alternate seat on the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee representing the New Monterey neighborhood, and Peter Silva to the vacant seat on the Planning Commission, as outlined in the “Discussion” section of this report.

VALUE DRIVER:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This recommendation conforms to Monterey City Code and the California Maddy Act.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications with this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 140 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could take no action or could make alternate appointments.

DISCUSSION:

Background
Vacant seats on Monterey’s boards, commissions, and committees were duly advertised by the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to the California Maddy Act and the Council’s appointments policy, seeking qualified applications for the following vacancies, with priority review for those applications received by February 24, 2023:

Architectural Review Committee – one vacant seat (vacated February 7, 2023 by the appointment of Robert Bluth to the Planning Commission) Building and Housing Appeals Board – one vacant Alternate seat (vacant since Kathleen White resigned in December 2021)
Disabled Access Appeals Board – one vacant seat (vacated by the resignation of Kathleen White in December, 2021)
Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee – one vacant New Monterey Alternate seat (vacated February 7, 2023 by the appointment of Chinyere Ogbonna to the Representative position for the same neighborhood), one vacant Del Monte Beach Alternate seat (vacated January 27, 2023 by the resignation of Harry Nagel), and vacant Alternate seats representing Aguajito Oaks, Alta Mesa, and Deer Flats neighborhoods (all three Alternate seats vacant for over six years) Planning Commission – one vacant seat (vacated January 27, 2023 by the resignation of Stephen Millich)
Qualified applications for these positions were received from the following residents and are attached to this packet. Residency requirements were confirmed by the City Clerk using the GIS assessment database, and in the case of the Building and Housing Appeals Board applicant, the Building Official confirmed that the applicant’s stated qualifications meet the special eligibility requirements of the City Code.

Architectural Review Committee
William Pyzel
Gabriel Sanders
Kimberly Turgen
Building and Housing Appeals Board
William Pyzel
NCIP Committee – Del Monte Beach Alternate
Jeff White
NCIP Committee – New Monterey Alternate
Chris Cobb
William Pyzel
Natalia G. Tjandra
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 141 Planning Commission
Chris Cobb
William Pyzel
Gabriel Sanders
Shelly Schmidt
Peter Silva
James Sullivan
Patrick Tregenza
Kaitlin Emmons
Recommendation
Mayor Williamson reviewed the applications seen in this packet and conducted interviews with each applicant above in accordance with Council policy and gave appropriate attention and time to the process that resulted in the following recommendations. Mayor Williamson is grateful that residents applied, and recommends that the Council make appointments as follows:

Architectural Review Committee
Kimberly Turgen – for a term expiring June 30, 2027
Building and Housing Appeals Board
William Pyzel – for a term expiring June 30, 2027
NCIP Committee – Del Monte Beach Alternate
Jeff White – for a term expiring June 30, 2027
NCIP Committee – New Monterey Alternate
Natalia G. Tjandra – for a term expiring June 30, 2027
Planning Commission
Peter Silva – for a term expiring June 30, 2027
Next Steps
Seats remain available on the Disabled Access Appeals Board and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee. Applications will continue to be received on an ongoing basis for these roles until the vacancies are filled. Monterey residents are encouraged to learn more and apply for these volunteer positions. Monterey residents interested in receiving notice of board and commission vacancies are encouraged to subscribe to the City’s “Boards and Commissions Interest List.”
CBK
Attachment: 1. Applications Received
e: Applicants
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 142 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 143 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 144 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 145 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 146 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 8, Packet Page 147 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 9, Packet Page 148 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A2EC6B3A-9F4D-4ED2-A0A5-3E7120D661D7 Kaitlin Emmons X
I am a passionate community development practitioner utilizing art as a vehicle for individualized growth. With a professional certificate in creative placemaking and a master's degree in Public Administration, I am interested in community development programs that leverage and celebrate assets that already exist within the community.

X
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 10, Packet Page 149 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 11, Packet Page 150 Kaitlin Emmons
kaitlinemmons.photography/ www.linkedin.com/in/kaitlin-emmons Film & digital photographer with 15+ years of practice. Dedicated teacher with global teaching experience.

Passionate community development practitioner utilizing art as a vehicle for individualized growth.

Education
Creative Placemaking Communities Virtual
Professional Certificate in Creative Placemaking September 2021 – June 2022 Middlebury Institute of International Studies Monterey, CA Master of Public Administration, Social Justice August 2017 - May 2019 International TEFL Academy Leon, Nicaragua
Professional Certificate in Teaching English as a Foreign Language January 2015 Bridgewater State University Bridgewater, MA
Bachelor of Arts Degree Political Science, International Affairs January 2013 Bachelor of Arts Degree Studio Art, Photography
Photography & Community Development
Kaitlin Emmons Art Monterey, CA
Freelance Photographer, Multimedia Artist January 2021-present • Established a sole proprietorship to professionalize custom photoshoots and fine art pieces for various organizations • Photographed events, weddings, concerts and designed album covers, clothing, logos, and infographics for clients • Managed bookkeeping, sales, marketing, purchasing of materials, and designed professional website • Technically proficient in darkroom and digital photography, alternative techniques, and adobe software Middlebury Institute of International Studies Monterey, CA Mural Subcommittee Project Lead, (iCAPP) January 2022 - present • Developed and conducted a large-scale mural in the heart of campus as the mural subcommittee project lead of the Institute Committee on Art in Public Places (iCAPP)
• Assembled a diverse project team of MIIS leadership, staff, student representatives and Monterey community partners to structure the project with equity and capitalize on existing assets within the community • Designed community capacity building events that utilize photo voice, creative visualization, and asset mapping activities to create a space for the MIIS and Monterey community members to deliberate, collaborate, and celebrate Monterey Museum of Art Monterey, CA
Consultant February 2019 – May 2019
• Designed a comprehensive database of economic indicators, demographic statistics, and local contacts to inform strategic resource allocation and programmatic decisions in launching Mobile Free Family Fun Day arts education outreach events at community nodes throughout Monterey County • Compiled dynamic art lessons designed to increase opportunities for equitable access to art education DocuSign Envelope ID: A2EC6B3A-9F4D-4ED2-A0A5-3E7120D661D7 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 12, Packet Page 151 Panorama Service Expeditions Managua, Nicaragua
Program Coordinator December 2016 - May 2017
• Collaborated on site with community leaders to design community development projects that address specific community needs such as food security, economic empowerment, and agricultural sustainability • Led groups of university students on service trips in sustainable development projects that included education, economic development, medical brigades, and environmental conservation initiatives in rural communities • Served as liaison between local community members and service trip participants translating, communicating project instructions, and developing project ideas
Teaching
The Weston Collective Seaside, CA
Community Darkroom Course August 2021 – present
• Taught darkroom photography demos on darkroom equipment, chemicals, and the analog printing process • Selected as first speaker for monthly workshop series to curate an interactive three-hour workshop on my unique photographic process of layering souped 35mm film and digital images to create vibrant multimedia collages • Invited to speak on the Where Photography's Past Meets its Future Panel Discussion at Pacific Grove Art Center Kala Art Institute Berkeley, CA
Teaching Assistant June 2018 - August 2018
• Supported rotating teachers and engaged students in hands-on art activities by creating a safe environment • Documented summer program with photographs that were used for future marketing initiatives and grant reports English First Bali, Indonesia
English as a Second Language Teacher May 2015 – March 2016 • Creatively reconstructed basic lesson plans and consistently utilized supplementary material to maximize learning • Focused on improving grammar, listening, writing, reading, and speaking skills for students and adults of all ages Lalela Project Hout Bay, South Africa
Intern December 2013 – March 2014
• Served as the Lead Teacher at three primary schools and led after school workshops that utilized art projects to create a safe space for children ages 5-17 to process trauma, foster healing, and promote community building • Co-taught classes during Holiday Program Workshops in five different township communities Administrative Experience
James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) Monterey, CA Research Associate August 2019 - Present
• Author and co-author articles for the CNS website on high-level center research, events, and initiatives, disseminate to social media, and tailor language to reach specific audiences • Design infographics and interactive materials for nonproliferation and disarmament education • Represent CNS at monthly DEI partnership meetings and selected to serve on the CNS DEI Committee • Provide administrative support for grant reporting for multimillion dollar grants, process financial invoices for contractors, support visiting fellows program, and schedule and run all center meetings, seminars, and workshops DocuSign Envelope ID: A2EC6B3A-9F4D-4ED2-A0A5-3E7120D661D7 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 13, Packet Page 152 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A1C6BBE5-BA99-462D-A536-1F7647A1C46D X
N/A
N/A
Pyzel
1590 Canyon Del Rey
X
William
X
Order Fulfillment
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 14, Packet Page 153 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A1C6BBE5-BA99-462D-A536-1F7647A1C46D William Pyzel X
X
X
- Bachelors degree in engineering and an MBA
- 23 years experience in engineering and construction
- 7 years experience in project management including the full range of construction work - civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical, including municipal code compliance - 3 years experience under-grounding existing overhead electrical utilities, including coordination with other utilities and municipalities
I have been a Little League coach and league treasurer, church trustee, and mentor to high school students interested is science. I have been a pole worker for numerous elections and worked the Shoreline Community Church food pantry and clothing closet. I participate in beach and community clean-up events whenever possible.

Community involvement is important to me, and I view volunteerism as a civic duty. I have a breadth of knowledge and experience that would benefit my community in any of the bodies in which I have expressed an interest.

My interests include architecture, history, travel, and enjoying outdoor activities, specifically kayaking, hiking, and cycling. I have lived in small towns and big cities, and I have traveled the world. I have lived in Monterey since 2016 and have come to understand how really special this area is.

One of the things that makes Monterey uniquely special is the number of people here who appreciate what we have. I too appreciate it, and I appreciate the opportunity to serve.

Sincerely,
William D. Pyzel
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 15, Packet Page 154 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 16, Packet Page 155 Re: Commission Applications
Gabriel Sanders
Fri 2/10/2023 2:42 PM
To: Clementine Bonner Klein <[email protected]>
Hello Clementine,
Yes, please put my prior application in for the following:

Planning Commission
Architectural Review Committee
Thank you so much for your help!
Gabe
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:29 PM Clementine Bonner Klein [email protected] wrote:

Hi Gabriel,
Do you wish for me to put your prior application in for consideration in the new round? Please confirm I would be happy to do that for you upon request Thank you,
Clementine
From: Gabriel Sanders
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 11:42 AM
To: Clementine Bonner Klein <[email protected]>
Subject: Commission Applications
Hello Clementine,
I saw the notice of more commission openings yesterday.

Do I need to resubmit my application from the last round or can you re-enter me with my previous application?
Thank you!
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of the City of Monterey mail system DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe ] City of Monterey Logo
Facebook icon LinkedIn icon Twitter icon Youtube icon Instagram icon www.monterey.org
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 17, Packet Page 156 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 94DB539A-4AE0-4A44-900F-33CD0F0EE945 N/A
N/A
Sanders
N/A
X
Gabriel
Housing Policy Advocate
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 18, Packet Page 157 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 94DB539A-4AE0-4A44-900F-33CD0F0EE945 X
Gabriel Sanders
X
I graduated in 2019 from the Middlebury Institute with a Master's in Public Administration. The focus of my study was on development, homelessness, and housing policy. I wrote my thesis on the intersection of water and housing policy on the Monterey Peninsula as it relates to fulfilling RHNA requirements and meeting the SWRCB's CDO mandate.

In the years since I've worked for the CA Department of Housing and Community and Development in the Housing Policy Division which now oversees the Housing Element Review process. I worked to solve housing law compliance issues with my colleagues during my employment until I was hired as Deputy Director of a county-wide policy advocacy organization. For most of 2022, I've been working to advance pro-housing policy across Monterey County – including in the City of Monterey – and have developed a comprehensive policy framework for meeting HCD's Housing Element requirements.

I'm especially interested in and well-suited to the opening on the planning commission which will oversee some of the critical decisions for housing development in the coming years during and after the 6th Cycle Housing Element update. I understand that not all planning commission meetings and decisions concern housing development and I am eager to learn more about the operation of the commission as I am interested in becoming more deeply involved in local government administration.

X
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 19, Packet Page 158 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 20, Packet Page 159 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 74D90E13-5C1C-4240-84D7-2B4778672BAE Shelly
Retired Deputy Sheriff
N/A
N/A
Schmidt
N/A
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 21, Packet Page 160 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 74D90E13-5C1C-4240-84D7-2B4778672BAE College Education: B.S. City and Regional Planning from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Work Experience: 1990-1994 Land Use Planner for Santa Barbara County 1994-1998 Land Use Planner for Monterey County
and Code Enforcement Officer for Monterey County
1998-2019 Deputy Sheriff for Monterey County
Correctional Deputy, Field Training Officer and
Bailiff for Monterey County Superior Court

2019-2021 Legal Secretary/Paralegal at Dunnion Law Firm Public Service 2020-current Member of the City of Monterey Architectural Review

Committee
Please see attached document for further information.

Shelly Mow Schmidt
X
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 22, Packet Page 161 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 23, Packet Page 162

I was raised in a family that is committed to public service. I grew up listening to my Grandfather’s words “You cannot keep taking from your community, you must also give back to your community.” and have made it a personal goal to continue to serve my community to the best of my ability. I have always worked for local governments, and took pride in the work I did. Since retiring from the Monterey County Sheriff’s Department, I continued to want to be active in public service. My husband is currently serving on the City of Monterey’s Park Commission, and I am a current member of the Architectural Review Committee for the City of Monterey. We continue to want to be active in the City of Monterey, and want to help make our city the best it can be.

Since making presentations to the Planning Commission as a planner, I have always had the goal of one day being the Commissioner listening to staff present their findings and recommendations. I know the hard work staff does to ensure that all local rules, regulations and policies are adhered to, and all proposed projects are consistent, as well as make any conditions of approval to mitigate any potential inconsistencies or issues that may arise. I look forward to utilizing my education and experience as a member of the Planning Commission, and continue serving the City of Monterey.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 74D90E13-5C1C-4240-84D7-2B4778672BAE ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 24, Packet Page 163 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 353F3708-8384-4E25-AEE1-8C4ED7DB7EAC Architect
2340 Garden Road Monterey 8316494642
Silva Peter
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 25, Packet Page 164 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 353F3708-8384-4E25-AEE1-8C4ED7DB7EAC Peter Silva Licensed architect state of California
Former chair and member Monterey ARC
Former member Santa Cruz board of building and fire appeals Member Monterey board of building and housing appeals
X
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 26, Packet Page 165 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 27, Packet Page 166 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 28, Packet Page 167 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 29, Packet Page 168 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 30, Packet Page 169 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 31, Packet Page 170 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 32, Packet Page 171 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 33, Packet Page 172 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 34, Packet Page 173 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 35, Packet Page 174 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4576196F-BAEB-4972-9224-051014511A3E Natalia Tjandra I am applying to be NCIP ALTERNATE for New Monterey neighborhood. - I have a Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Management Information System - I work in our family business, DataRay Inc., as their Chief Financial Officer since 2019. I previously helped manage day to day operations including bookkeeping and financial reports, as well as marketing.
- I was involved in The Women’s Fund in Redding, CA, for 5 years until my move to Monterey, CA. I was on The Women’s Fund Board as Chair from 2020-2022. I was previously their Community Engagement Committee Chair from 2017-2021. My responsibilities include managing The Women’s Fund daily operations, being involved in The Women’s Fund grant process from start to finish (RFP submission, grantee selection, members voting process, grant funding, etc), as well as managing website and member communication process. The Women’s Fund awards funding to local nonprofits and public entities who seek to address its overall mission to create a better future for women and their families in the Redding area.
- I was also a CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) in Shasta County since 2017, up until my move to Monterey, CA.
- I’m a very community-minded person. I love being involved in whatever community I’m in. I’m very familiar and well versed with volunteer work and grant process (directing fund to serve the fund’s mission). I love learning and truly believe the best way to learn about my new community and neighborhood in Monterey, specifically New Monterey, is by being involved in programs such as NCIP.

I appreciate the consideration.

X
X
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 36, Packet Page 175 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 37, Packet Page 176 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9EFDB116-A109-44AF-8882-9C804BD523EE 248 Pearl St 831-594-5959
Commercial Photographer
Tregenza Patrick
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 38, Packet Page 177 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9EFDB116-A109-44AF-8882-9C804BD523EE I've served on the ARC for 4 years and am currently Vice-Chair. While I've enjoyed my time on the ARC, I'd like to have the opportunity to weigh in on projects at an earlier time frame.

X
Patrick A Tregenza
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 39, Packet Page 178 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 40, Packet Page 179 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 41, Packet Page 180 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 195F0863-80A2-4D44-9A55-DA2FB5725974 X
Kimberly Turgen
resume is attached ~
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 42, Packet Page 181 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 43, Packet Page 182 kimberly turgen
Regional Specification Manager
LMI Architectural Resources

CONTACT
mobile
monterey

EXPERIENCE
LMI Architectural Resources, Northern California/Nevada Regional Specification Manager December 2015 to Present • Strategically develop new retail + specification business • Work with over 85 Showrooms and Associates for all 12 LMI Brands • Create displays for all Brands/Showroom
• Train Sales staff on all applicable Brands
• Work with Architects & Designers in Northern California and Nevada to educate on product and create specifications for Residential, Commercial and Hospitality Projects
• Manage the existing business through relationships with key decision makers - this includes Showrooms, A&D community, Developers, Hotel Groups, Key project suppliers & Relevant Trades - Builders & Mechanical Contractors
• Maintain focus on growing residential specifications + project sector Ferguson Enterprises, Inc., Seaside, CA
Consultant January 2014 to December 2015
• Specialize in large projects with large volume builders and complex clients • Project management, specializing in working with multiple vendors and tradesmen to coordinate and ensure accurate project timing for clients Showroom Manager July 2010 to December 2013
• Responsible for the daily operations of showroom including staff scheduling, staff responsibilities,
vendor relationships.
• Increased Sales from 3.5M to 5M an average increase of 8% per fiscal year • Responsible for building, developing, and motivating the diverse team of 8 associates
• Develop close relationships with contractors and retail customers, • Work closely with industry leading vendors to procure funds to update displays in showroom
• Host Events to promote vendors for local customers and industry partners
• Develop and execute yearly Showroom Strategic Plan
• Create and implement yearly Marketing & Event Plan for the showroom. • Set and maintain price discount matrix for area showrooms Del Rey Fine Plumbing and Hardware, Seaside, CA
Showroom Manager October 2004 to December 2009
• Assisted designers, homeowners, contractors, and plumbers with plumbing selections for bath and kitchen projects
• Worked closely with top tier vendors to secure exclusivity Luxury plumbing lines for Monterey,
• Plan and execute events for premier brand partners and local A&D community
• Specialized in major remodels with designers and architects to problem solve job issues
• Outside marketing to Architects and designers, as well as job site visits for home owner design assistance
•Visual merchandising and 2005 major remodel of showroom, coordinated and designed all showroom vignette displays,
• Manage continual pricing changes from approximately 100 vendors

AWARD-WINNING DESIGNER
2008 SONIA AMERICA
“You know what you should do…”
Design Contest winner -
• Designed a versatile sophisticated modern vanity
suite with several components to grow with families
of young children
• Designed matching towel bars and accessories as
well as towel warmers to complete the design

ORGANIZATIONS
NARI National Association of the Remodeling
Industry, 2006-2014
• Membership Chair, Marketing Chair
SpectorDance
Board Chair 2012-2014
• Assist with costume design and implementations
• Create fundraising opportunities by adding Events
to each performance
• Chair, East West Fundraiser October 2014

EDUCATION
San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA
1998-2001
Bachelor of Arts – Studio Art, Arts Education
Minor – Interior Design
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 1989-1993
Interior Design
DocuSign Envelope ID: 195F0863-80A2-4D44-9A55-DA2FB5725974 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 44, Packet Page 183 (CONTINUED)

CITY OF MONTEREY APPLICATION

TO SERVE ON A BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION
Name:

Last Name First Name Middle Initial (optional)
Primary Phone Number: Alternate Phone:

Residential Address: Monterey, CA 93940*
Email Address:

Business Address: Business Phone:

Occupation:
* Monterey residence is required
Check the box next to all body(s) on which you are interested in serving. Note that appointments are not limited to body(s) checked.

APPEALS HEARING BOARD – meets as needed
The Appeals Hearing Board conducts hearings and appeals relating to administrative orders, denials, and suspensions; revocations of massage establishment permits; bidder responsibility determinations; fees, penalties, and other sums of money owed to the City; administrative abatement actions; and authorizes the imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE – meets 1st and 3
rd Wed. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) reviews projects to ensure orderly development and harmonious design; implements the General Plan and neighborhood plans; preserves and promotes the visual character of the City; and reviews and oversees architectural review submittal requirements. Members: Seven, at least one architect or person professionally competent in a field related to architecture.

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES – meets 4th Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Board of Library Trustees manages the library’s collections; makes and enforces bylaws, rules and regulations for the library’s administration; appoints and removes the Library Director and other library personnel; performs additional duties as prescribed; and requests expenditures from the library trust fund. Members: Five.

BUILDING AND HOUSING APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Building and Housing Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to building, fire, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical codes, and authorizes imposition of liens, special assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Three plus one alternate, with experience and training relating to building construction, building trades, code enforcement, or building inspection.

DISABLED ACCESS APPEALS BOARD – meets as needed
The Disabled Access Appeals Board hears appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations relating to disabled access, and authorizes imposition of liens, assessments, and other collection processes. Members: Five, three with experience and training relating to building construction and/or disabled access regulations, and two of whom who are physically disabled.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m., plus field trips The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) acts and makes recommendations on matters relating to promotion, restoration, preservation, and protection of Monterey’s historic buildings, sites, artifacts, and features; and adopts minimum submittal requirements for historic preservation review. Members: Seven.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7CC8F251-812A-4C14-A67D-13EF44068429 27300 Rancho San Carlos Rd., Carmel, CA 93923
GM & PD of KRML
White
N/A
Jeff
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 45, Packet Page 184 Name:
2 MEASURE P AND S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE – meets quarterly The Measure P and S Oversight Committee reviews revenues generated by Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Transactions and Use Tax, and expenditures of those revenues, and reports to the City Council. Members: Five.

MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION – meets 1
st Thurs. of ea. month at 4 p.m.

The Museums and Cultural Arts Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the City’s museums, Monterey history, and cultural arts. Members: Seven, representing a variety of history and cultural arts-related disciplines and activities.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE – meets seasonally The Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods by considering all submitted projects and recommending to Council which projects should be funded. Members: One representative and one alternate representing the following designated neighborhoods (check one; you must reside in the jurisdiction):
 Aguajito Oaks  Alta Mesa  Casanova-Oak Knoll  Deer Flats  Del Monte Beach  Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande  Downtown  Fisherman Flats  Glenwood  Monterey Vista  New Monterey  Oak Grove  Old Town  Skyline  Villa Del Monte
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – meets 2nd Wed. of ea. month at 5:30 p.m.

The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters pertaining to the maintenance and development of the City's parks and recreation programs, and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Members: Seven.

PLANNING COMMISSION – meets 2nd and 4
th Tues. of ea. month at 4 p.m. and 7 p.m., plus field trips The Planning Commission implements the General Plan and specific and area plans; reviews the Capital Improvement and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs; develops community development programs; administers zoning and subdivision ordinances and recommends revisions to City Council; hears appeals on matters of development, zoning, and architectural review; and reviews and acts on applications for development approval, including use of land and buildings, height and bulk of buildings, open space regulations, parking requirements, etc. Members: Seven.

Please list in the following space your relevant education, work experience, public service and/or volunteer experience, and/or other experiences that would enhance your service and effectiveness on the body(s) for which you are applying. Feel free to attach additional sheets, a cover letter, resume, and/or additional pages to fully describe your qualifications and interest in this position.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7CC8F251-812A-4C14-A67D-13EF44068429 X
X
With a Major in Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management with a concentration in Natural Resources and minor in Environmental Science from North Carolina State University, I am aware of the relationship between municipalities and public improvement projects. As the GM & PD of locally owned and operated KRML and a sitting board member of the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce, I understand the value of tourism and how the revenue from it can be used to improve our communities for both locals and visitors. Also, as the Chair of the board for the Surfrider Foundation Chapter of Monterey County, I see how important it is to protect the beaches, such as the one in my neighborhood, for the well being of our ecosystem and as an attraction to tourists.

Jeff White
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 46, Packet Page 185 Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 13., Item Page 47, Packet Page 186 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve a Letter Urging the State Legislature to Take Action to Address the Fentanyl Crisis (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve a letter urging the California legislature to take action to address the fentanyl crisis.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is within the City Council’s purview to take positions on proposed legislation or provide feedback on policy issues at the state level.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose to not approve a letter urging the California legislature to take action to address the fentanyl crisis.

Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 187 DISCUSSION:

Communities throughout California are struggling with a quickly evolving opioid crisis, which is now being driven by the increase in synthetic opioid-related deaths — primarily fentanyl.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 71,000 people died from synthetic opioid-related overdose in the United States in 2021, of which, 7,000 deaths occurred in California. In other words, 1 out of every 10 deaths from synthetic opioids in the United States occurs in California. The CDC reports, “Overdose deaths remain a leading cause of injury-related death in the United States.” Further, “For every drug overdose that results in death, there are many more nonfatal overdoses.” Proposed legislation to help address the fentanyl crisis includes:

AB 33 (Bains) Fentanyl Addiction and Overdose Prevention Task Force.

Would establish the Fentanyl Addiction and Overdose Prevention Task Force to undertake various duties relating to fentanyl abuse.
 League of California Cities’ Position: Support
AB 367 (Maienschein) Controlled Substances: Enhancements.

Would clarify that the “great bodily injury” sentence enhancement applies when a person sells or otherwise provides fentanyl to a person who subsequently suffers a significant or substantial physical injury from using the substance.
 League of California Cities’ Position: Support
AB 474 (Rodriguez) State Threat Assessment Center: Transnational Criminal Organizations Would require the State Threat Assessment Center and the California Office of Emergency Services to prioritize, to the greatest extent possible, cooperation with state and local efforts to disrupt and dismantle criminal networks trafficking opioid drugs that pose a threat to California.
 League of California Cities’ Position: Support
AB 955 (Petrie-Norris) Controlled Substances
Would make the sale of fentanyl on a social media platform in California punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of 3, 6, or 9 years.  League of California Cities’ Position: Support
Media Headlines Reporting the Fentanyl Crisis in California Monterey County
UC Santa Barbara student from Monterey dies after fentanyl overdose (KION, April 14, 2023) Man arrested in Seaside with fentanyl, heroin, Xanax, meth and weapons (KION, March 24, 2023)
Two arrested on Fremont Street for narcotics including over 90 grams of fentanyl (KION, March 17, 2023)
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 188 Local addiction experts say addiction treatment is the best solution to solving fentanyl crisis (KSBW, March 1, 2023)
Suspected fentanyl overdose puts inmate, jail nurse and six deputies in the hospital (KION, January 8, 2023)
Judge sentences fentanyl dealer to 6 years for providing drug that led to fatal overdose (CBS Bay Area, November 8, 2022)
Seaside woman arrested for sales of fentanyl during investigation into overdose death at Moose Lodge (KION, October 24, 2022)
Mom speaks on losing her son to fentanyl during Monterey Overdose Awareness conference (KION, August 31, 2022)
Police warn parents after finding rainbow-colored fentanyl (New York Post, July 12, 2022) Seaside teen accused of selling Fentanyl laced drugs that killed Carmel Valley man (KSBW, June 23, 2020)
Teens charged after Pacific Grove boy dies from fentanyl overdose (KRON, May 9, 2022) Merced
California dad arrested after girl, 2, overdoses on fentanyl San Francisco
Drug overdose deaths in California are skyrocketing, as the fentanyl crisis reaches beyond San Francisco
Aliso Viejo
More teenagers dying from fentanyl. ‘It has a hold on me, and I don’t know why’ Santa Cruz
12-year-old Santa Cruz girl overdoses on Fentanyl, after buying drug Sacramento
'Someone knows something': Sacramento family in mourning after 20-year-old dies of fentanyl poisoning
Fentanyl continues to take students’ lives in Sacramento. Here’s how parents and schools are responding.

Los Angeles
Teen died from fentanyl in school bathroom as mom begged staff to find her L.A. riders bail on Metro trains amid ‘horror’ of deadly drug overdoses, crime 10 Los Angeles middle schoolers treated for suspected overdoses Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 189 Hollywood
7th LAUSD teen overdoses from possible fentanyl-laced pills Gilroy
3 dead, 1 hospitalized in suspected fentanyl overdose in Gilroy: sheriff Riverside
Woman died from fentanyl overdose while at Riverside County sobering center, according to lawsuit
Bakersfield
Reports detail toddler’s fentanyl overdose; parents admit smoking drug every 7 hours North HS parents, administrators concerned over social media reports of fentanyl overdoses
Fresno
'If she could save one life': Legacy for CA fentanyl victim who died before high school graduation Moreno Valley
Man dead, 2 women hospitalized after possibly ingesting fentanyl at Moreno Valley hotel Orange County
Startling increase found in deaths of Orange County homeless people. Drugs are the main cause
Placer County/Roseville
Video shows alleged fentanyl sale and overdose minutes later in Placer County Santa Clarita
Possible fentanyl overdose in Santa Clarita sends junior high student to hospital Kern County/Ridgecrest
Fentanyl overdoses on the rise in the community
Riverbank
18-month-old dies of a fentanyl overdose in Riverbank; mother and boyfriend arrested San Luis Obispo
California mother charged after 3-year-old son dies of fentanyl overdose San Bernardino County/Victorville
18-year-old charged with murder in teen’s fentanyl overdose death in San Bernardino County Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 190 Livermore
23-month-old dies from fentanyl overdose, California cops say. Now dad is arrested Bay Area/Los Gatos
‘We are not trying to scare you.’ In California, fentanyl now behind 1 out of every 5 youth deaths
Fentanyl-fueled overdose deaths are spiking in these Bay Area ZIP codes Butte County
2-year-old overdoses on fentanyl, parents arrested in Northern California Upland
Upland High student dies from fentanyl overdose
Yuba County
Man charged with murder for in-custody fentanyl overdose Milpitas
13 inmates overdose on fentanyl in Milpitas jail in one week Statewide
‘One pill can kill’: Tragic teen deaths spur California schools to finally battle fentanyl crisis As these headlines relate, the impact of drug overdoses is staggering. While media headlines tell a story, research confirms this. In a January 19, 2022 Pew Research Center article, titled “Recent surge in U.S. drug overdose deaths has hit Black men the Hardest” the opening paragraph reads: Nearly 92,000 American died of drug overdoses in 2020, marking a 30% increase from the year before, a 75% increase over five years and by far the highest annual total on record, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Preliminary figures suggest that the 2021 death toll from overdoses may be even higher.

Staff is not recommending specific endorsement of specific bills at this time, but rather provides a general recommendation that the state legislature take action on fentanyl-related bills.

Attachments: 1. Draft Letter
e: League of California Cities
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 191 ATTACHMENT 1
May 16, 2023
The Honorable Anthony Rendon
Speaker, California State Assembly
1021 O Street, Suite 8330
Sacramento, CA 95814
The Honorable James Gallagher
Republican Leader, State Assembly
1021 O Street, Suite 4740
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Action Needed on Fentanyl and Substance Use-Related Legislation Dear Speaker Rendon and Assembly Republican Leader Gallagher, The City of Monterey urges the Legislature to take further action this year to address the fentanyl crisis.

Cities are committed to enacting legislative solutions that strike an appropriate balance between community justice and public safety. However, delaying additional legislative action another year will undoubtedly result in many more preventable deaths.

Constituents throughout California are relying on their legislators to act swiftly.

Fentanyl poisonings and the rising death toll illustrate a complex issue that requires a multi-faceted and collaborative approach. The City of Monterey supports additional funding and resources to address the substance use crisis through appropriate prevention and intervention efforts, educational awareness campaigns, increased access to lifesaving overdose treatment aids such as naloxone, and stricter penalties for those facilitating the illicit production, transportation and sales of these substances.

Cities not only welcome increased collaboration with our state and federal partners, but we truly require it in order to meaningfully address the fentanyl crisis facing our communities.

For these reasons, the City of Monterey calls on the Legislature to thoughtfully deliberate on and provide solutions for one of the most pressing issues of our time. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact the City Manager’s Office at (831) 646-3760 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Mayor Tyller Williamson
City of Monterey
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 192 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Receive Report About the Final Administrative Draft Compatible Use Study (Exempt from CEQA Article 18, Section 15262)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a report about the Final Administrative Draft Compatible Use Study.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The study identifies issues and opportunities for the region to address in future planning efforts.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City is only reviewing a study. There are no fiscal impacts.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 18, Section 15262) because the project is a planning study for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded. Furthermore, the study is not being adopted.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

This is an informational report only.

DISCUSSION:

What is a Compatible Use Study?
The Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study (CUS) is a collaborative effort between the community, state and federal agencies, and other interested stakeholders to develop appropriate actions to address compatibility and shared resources in the region.

The primary goal of the CUS is to gather and evaluate information to reduce potential future land use and resource conflicts between the military installations in Monterey County and northern portions of San Luis Obispo County and the surrounding communities, while accommodating and promoting new compatible growth and economic development. However, Date: 5/16/2023
Item No.: 15.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 1, Packet Page 193 the study is only an informational document and is not formally adopted by any agency. It is intended to stimulate further discussion about issues and opportunities.

The Monterey Regional CUS project study area includes both a North and South County Study area as depicted in Figures 1 and 2. Major military facilities in these areas include: Presidio of Monterey, Naval Support Activity Monterey, Fort Hunter Liggett and Camp Roberts.

Figure 1 North County Study Area Figure 2 South County Study Area Community Engagement
Community Engagement included public meetings, stakeholder interviews, and stakeholder meetings. The COVID pandemic was widespread during the study. As a result, public engagement was modified to online formats.

Public Meetings
Public Meeting #1: Project Initiation — November 2021-Project Duration The City offered its first virtual public open house in response to the Covid pandemic.

The virtual open house established a baseline for project transparency and accessibility and facilitated public input. The online open house remained available on the website for the duration of the project for additional comments. Due to the expanse of the Study Area and regional diversity, Matrix developed four separate open houses: North County (English and Spanish) and South County (English and Spanish). The information presented was tailored to each geographic area.

The virtual open houses incorporated three important elements:

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 2, Packet Page 194

1. Sign-in Table: The table was set up as the initial contact point to provide visitors guidance on the virtual format, information on the project, and forms to share background information about
themselves and give project feedback. Resources included the following:
 Sign-in form
 Comment form
 Map for participants to identify where they live
 Help button
 Short video explaining how to navigate the open house  Factsheet #1: Project Overview

2. Community Questionnaire: The two questionnaires for each of the two Study Area locations were designed to access the community’s perceptions of the military’s impact on the region. The questionnaires are described in greater detail below.

3. Informational Boards: The boards provided an overview of the CUS process. Each board was available for viewing online or downloading as a PDF file. One board included an interactive map feature that allowed participants to identify location-specific military compatibility issues in,their community.

Public Meeting #2: Interim Findings and Preliminary Recommendations — June 29, 2022 The second set of public meetings was conducted following the completion of all data collection, research, and compilation of responses to the questionnaire. The meetings included information on existing and projected conflicts between installation operations and existing/future growth in surrounding jurisdictions. The meetings provided summary findings and an interactive exercise that allowed participants to rank the importance of the compatibility issues in terms of recommended timeframes for addressing them.

All information gathered was incorporated into the draft reports, as appropriate.

Public Meeting #3: Final Recommendations — October 2022 The Public Draft CUS was developed based on CUS working group comments and revisions to the Working Group Draft CUS. The Public Draft CUS was advertised and posted on the project website for a 30-day public review and comment period. The document was presented at the third public meeting, where attendees were encouraged to provide feedback during the meeting, through the project website, or by contacting the CUS Project Team directly.

Community Questionnaires
The online community questionnaire was designed to capture the community’s perception of military impacts on the community. Two questionnaires were tailored for the North County and South County Study Area locations, respectively. The information obtained from the questionnaire helped to gauge public knowledge and perceptions regarding military operations and their effects on residents. The information was used to help identify compatibility issues and tailor the Monterey Regional CUS process and strategies to improve awareness where needed, reinforce communication, and enhance coordination between the military installations and the community. There were 21 questions, divided into the following categories.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 3, Packet Page 195  General demographics
 Communication between the military and the community
 Perception of military installations in the community  Impacts related to the military installations and neighboring communities Stakeholder Interviews
The project team conducted extensive stakeholder interviews as depicted in the chart below:

Chart 1: Stakeholder Interview List
Workgroup Meetings
Four workgroup meetings were also hosted in April 2021, September 2021, March 2022, and October 2022.

Meeting #1: April 2021
The key objectives of the project kick-off meeting were to:
 Outline the CUS goals
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 4, Packet Page 196  Educate working group members about the CUS and study process  Identify the roles and responsibilities of participants  Review and finalize specific locations for the Study Area  Provide an opportunity for working group members to give input on what compatibility issues should be considered and/or assessed during the CUS Meeting #2 - September 2021
The key objectives of the second set of meetings follow:
 Identify potential data gaps. Present the compatibility issues identified to date, as well as associated findings.
 Provide an opportunity for working group members to review, revise, and approve the list of compatibility issues that will be assessed through the CUS. The working group discussions resulted in the identification of new compatibility issues, which helped ensure the Study was as comprehensive as possible.

Meeting #3 — March 2022
Before the third set of meetings, a preliminary list of strategies was submitted to working group members to review as a starting point for developing and refining strategies for the CUS. The key objective of the third set of meetings follows:
 Garner input from the working groups on potential strategies for mitigating or preventing compatibility issues.

Meeting #4 and Public Meeting — October 2022
The key objective of the fourth set of meetings was to:
 Review the Draft CUS and recommendations ahead of public review.

The public was invited to listen in on this fourth working group meeting and was provided an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Following this meeting, the Public Draft CUS was developed based on working group comments and revisions and was released for public review and comment. Public feedback was presented to the working groups for guidance on appropriate revisions.

Final Review
The final step is for the City Council to be briefed on the Compatible Use Study. The CUS is only intended to be an informational document and does not need to be adopted. The Final Administrative Draft of the CUS (April 2023) is attached, and can be accessed at:
https://montereyregionalcus.com/
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 5, Packet Page 197 The Study – Issues and Potential Strategies
The main purpose of this informational study is to identify issues and potential strategies for future consideration. The study is divided into two sections: North and South County. The following charts summarize the study’s findings.

Table 1: North County Issues and Potential Strategies
Issues Potential Strategies/Ideas
AQ-1: Non-attainment of regional air quality
standards requires that military installations
obtain air permits for any stationary emitters,
which may limit future mission expansion.

The North County Study Area, located within the
North Central Coast Air Basin, is currently
nonattainment for the CAAQS for PM10.

Nonattainment for any CAAQS or NAAQS, as well as
air permitting requirements can potentially constrain
current military operations, and future expansion of
NSA Monterey.

AQ-1A Continue to monitor air permit requests.

AQ-1B: Coordinate with MBARD for monitoring
air permit requests within the air district.

AQ-1C: Monitor the CalEPA air permit request
website weekly to identify new requests that may
impact air quality in the region.

AT-1: There may be anti-terrorism/force protection
(AT/FP) concerns regarding future
development close to military installations.

Future development around NSA Monterey, POM and
DMDC may be an AT/FP concern if new development
occurs adjacent to the installation perimeter. This type of development should be coordinated with the
appropriate installation staff to assess potential
impacts.

AT-1A: Include DMDC in development review
discussions between POM and the surrounding
communities.

COM-1: There is no formally established or
routine communication forum between the
military installations and surrounding
communities.

While there is generally good communication and
coordination between military installations and
neighboring community governments, the processes
and protocols of the interactions are not formalized.

This could lead to inconsistent planning and
coordination when there are changes in staff at the
military installations and/or local governments.

COM-1A: The region should consider
establishing a regional working group and/or ask
local communities to monitor CUS
implementation and address future compatibility
findings that may arise within Monterey Bay.

COM-1B: The Monterey Regional CUS Working
Group and/or local communities should consider
developing a charter for the Monterey Regional
Implementation Working Group.

COM-1C: Continue reoccurring coordination
efforts.

COM-2: There is no formalized protocol for
coordination between the military installations
and surrounding communities.

While there is generally good communication and
coordination flow between military installations and
neighboring community governments, the processes
and protocols are not formalized. This could lead to
inconsistent planning and coordination when there
are changes in staff at the military installations or local COM-2A: Formalize lines of communication
between NSAM, POM, and surrounding
communities.

COM-2B: Continue information sharing through
Team Monterey roundtable meetings.

COM-2C: Leverage the POM Installation
Planning Board for communications with the
surrounding jurisdictions.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 6, Packet Page 198 governments.

COM-2D: Include school districts in coordination
efforts regarding compatible planning and
recruitment efforts for military installations.

COM-2E: Circulate brochures to educate
communities about community impacts on
military installations in the region.

COM-2F: Create an interactive, web-based GIS
portal for regional coordination that is hosted by
AMBAG.

CR-1: There is concern regarding differences in
federal and state tribal consultation requirements.

Federal and state legal requirements for consulting
with American Indian Tribes differs depending on the
government agencies and public organizations
involved. This can impact how requirements for
cultural resource management are handled when
large-scale projects in the North County Study Area
involve federal, state, and/or private property and/or
funding.

CR-1A: Continue coordination efforts between
American Indian Tribes and military installations
for cultural resource consultation.

CR-2A: Continue ongoing cultural resource
coordination efforts.

FSC-1: 5G Cell coverage is limited on the
Monterey Peninsula, which may limit operations
at NSA Monterey.

NSA Monterey is currently constrained by older
cellular network technology in the Study Area and
limited availability of 5th generation (5G) network
coverage. This can create communication and
operations challenges for military installations on the peninsula.

FSC-1A: Monitor issues related to 5G and future
generations in the region.

FSC-1B: Notify military installations of 5G
projects.

HA-1: There is a perception in the community that
the military basic housing allowance (BAH)
impacts the local housing market.

The military provides allowances to offset the cost of
housing for military personnel. These rates are based
on annual surveys of the local market; however, there
has been a perception in the community that the basic
allowance for housing rates are higher than market
driven rental costs and thereby increase rental rates
for all housing in the community.

HA-1A: Consider developing high-density
workforce housing at the Former Fort Ord.

HA-1B: Establish a public-public cooperative
venture for public agency workforce housing.

HA-1C: Establish a public-private partnership to
increase housing stock for military personnel on
OMC and La Mesa housing areas.

HA-2: There is a concern about housing
affordability in the North County Study Area.

Regional housing rental prices and sales prices
continue to increase in the North County Study
Area. Increasing housing rents and prices may
present challenges for military personnel and
other community members when looking for housing.

HA-2A: Communicate military rental housing
needs.

HA-2B: Provide education materials on new
state legislation regarding veteran and military
spouse licensures.

HA-2C: Work to attract compatible industries.

HA-2D: Identify opportunities for tech-industry
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 7, Packet Page 199 and other related industry partnerships.

HA-3: There are concerns related to housing
availability and affordability in the community to
support military and community needs.

While there are some military installations that provide housing on military property, there may not be enough
on-base housing to support all personnel stationed on
the peninsula. Many personnel must live off base or
chose to live off base. This existing deficit in the North County Study Area creates competition between
residents and incoming personnel seeking housing
options in the community. Subsequently, the increase
demand for existing available housing reduces
affordable housing options.

HA-3B: Establish a relationship with local realtor
associations, landlords, local jurisdictions, and
other related organizations to inform them about
housing services that the Housing Office
provides to military personnel.

HA-4: Childcare availability has the potential to
impact the quality of life.

The POM has childcare options available for military
and civilian personnel on-base. Staff shortages limit
the availability of childcare at POM. Access to quality childcare can impact personnel retention at the
Presidio and at DLFLIC.

HA-4A: Establish an inventory of home-based
childcare opportunities.

HA-4B: Conduct regular public awareness
campaigns for childcare needs.

HA-4C: Provide education on childcare needs.

HA-4D: Work with the DoD to receive nonappropriated funding for childcare services and identify opportunities for increasing the childcare
services workforce.

HA-5: Education in the North County Study Area
can impact quality of life and thus
impact retention and recruitment.

The quality of primary and secondary schools in the
region may impact the quality of life for personnel
families. This could ultimately have impacts on
retention and recruitment to the area.

HA-5A: Include school districts and higher
education institutions in coordination efforts
regarding compatible planning and recruitment
efforts for military installations.

HA-5B: Provide education information to
incoming families.

HA-5C: Develop a community survey to
determine school quality perceptions.

LAS-1: Increased use of civilian unmanned
aircraft systems in the future could impact
military operations and generate security
concerns.

It is likely that both military and civilian use of
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) will increase in the
future. Civilian use of UAS can cause safety and
security concerns for the military if UASs are flown
close to or over any of the military installations located on the peninsula. While not yet considered a
significant issue, the potential for intentional or
unintentional UAS flights over military bases is a
stated security concern of the Navy.

LAS-1A: Enhance public awareness of safe
drone use around military installations.

LAS-1B: Educate commercial users of FAA
drone regulations.

LU-1: Growth in surrounding communities could
lead to land use encroachment.

LU-1A: Update the Monterey Regional Airport
Master Plan to include guidelines related to
compatibility with surrounding military
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 8, Packet Page 200 There is potential for future growth in surrounding
communities to encroach the POM, NSA Monterey,
and DMDC. Encroachment is generally understood as
ground-level horizontal development and use of land
near military facilities; however, encroachment can
also take a more vertical form with the development of
taller buildings near military installations and access control points. This potential is particularly evident
around the Presidio and NPS.
installations.

LU-1B: Update community planning documents
with relevant Military Influence Areas.

LU-1C: Prepare and execute formal Memoranda
of Agreement for development proposal review.

LU-1D: Add a “Military Element” to general plans
to include policies promoting form-based
compatible development around all military
installations.

PT-1: Trespassing at NSA Monterey and the OMC
is of concern.

There have been instances of unintentional
trespassing at NSA Monterey and OMC due to the
lack of security fencing around some areas, as well as
reported intentional intrusions of secure areas.

PT-1A: Consider establishing full perimeter fence
and signage around OMC.

PT-1B: Post signage along the NSAM fence line.

RE-1: There is a concern about the potential risk
from wildland fires in the North County
Study Area.

The North County Study Area is a mixture of
urbanized areas and less developed open space that
constitutes a WUI in several locations with risk of
wildland fire impacts
RE-1A: Develop a water contingency plan.

RE-1B: Coordinate solutions for power/water
outages
RE-1C: Coordinate with American Indian Tribes
for regional wildfire planning.

RE-1D: Include military installations in fire
protection plan updates.

RE-1E: Identify a project for FEMA BRIC grant
funding.

RE-1F: Apply for the National Coastal Resilience
Fund grant for fire resiliency.

RE-1G: Coordinate future updates to the
regional Hazard Mitigation Plan.

RE-2: There is a need for efficient evacuation
routes out of the peninsula.

A well-coordinated mass evacuation processes
between military installations and communities on the
Monterey Peninsula is needed to prepare for potential
hazardous events.

RE-2A: Coordinate future updates to the regional
Hazard Mitigation Plan.

RE-2B: Continue to exercise emergency
notification and request procedures for activation
of evacuation routes across POM.

RE-3: Erosion and sea level rise can lead to
coastal flooding and inundation issues at
military facilities on the peninsula.

One of the highest erosion rates in the country is at
the Beach Lab at NSA Monterey. Unabated erosion
can result in flooding, inundation and subsidence
issues at facilities, particularly the unmanned vehicle RE-3A: Identify a project for FEMA BRIC Grant
Funding.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 9, Packet Page 201 facility, as water levels rise.

RE-4: State-wide drought conditions undermine
resiliency.

Drought conditions throughout California continue to
be an issue for military resiliency due to limited water availability and increased wildfire risks.

RE-4A: Coordinate regionally for water
availability.

RE-5: There is a need for power redundancy and
resiliency at NSA Monterey.

Energy/power, and water redundancies are needed at
NSA Monterey to ensure that the installation is
resilient into the future.

RE-5A: Develop a Regional Military Installation
Resiliency (MIR) Plan.

RE-6: The Monterey Peninsula lacks redundancy
for groundwater production in the area.

The North County Study Area currently lacks
redundant or backup groundwater production wells
that can be placed in service if an existing production well fails or must be removed from service for an
extended period of time. The lack of redundancy can
result in impacts to military operations and community
services.

RE-6A: Develop redundant groundwater
production capacity.

RC-1: Traffic congestion at installation entrances
in the North County Study Area.

There is traffic congestion at POM and NSA Monterey
entrances, including on Lighthouse and Sloat
Avenues. Congestion could be exacerbated if gates
do not comply with current military requirements.)
RC-1A: Advocate for a turn lane.

RC-1B: Continue to stagger class times.

RC-1C: Include a NSAM and POM ex-oficio
member on the AMBAG Board.

RC-1D: Enhance bicycle network to alleviate
congestion.

RC-1E: Initiate the development of a traffic
engineering study.

RC-2: Limited transit options to and from military
installations create commuting concerns.

Some Monterey-Salinas Transit routes are suspended
due to the impacts of COVID-19, which may affect
transportation choices for long distance commuters
working on military installations in the North County
Study Area.

RC-2A: Coordinate with MST, TAMC, and
Caltrans.

RC-3: Parking on-base can have impacts on
parking conditions and congestion in the
surrounding community.

Efficient parking near key facilities on POM is limited, which can impact transportation choices for those
commuting to POM. This could also impact parking
conditions outside of the POM fence line, as well as
congestion in and outside of POM. Parking strategies
should also encourage transportation alternatives that
do not require parking, such as active and alternative
RC-3A: Perform a parking study.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 10, Packet Page 202 transportation.

PS-1: Accidents along Highway 1 illustrate force
protection vulnerability along the NSAM fence
line.

Accidents on Highway 1 can compromise force
protection along the southern boundary of the
NPS. Additionally, this vulnerability presents a force
protection concern for NSA Monterey.

PS-1A: Improve roadway conditions along
Highway 1.

PS-1B: Identify short term temporary solutions.

PS-2: Opportunity exists to enhance interagency
emergency response time and capability among
POM, Monterey County, and surrounding
communities.

The existing separation of emergency dispatch
centers and radio communications channels can
create delays and inefficiencies in emergency
response. Combined with integrated jurisdictions
and physically separated Army and Navy installations
separate channels of operational communications
may not be as effective as unified dispatch and radio
communications.

PS-2A: Integrate dispatch operations.

PS-3: Existing POM Police facility at OMC may not
be an optimal location.

The existing POM Police station is located on the
OMC near Campus Town in the City of Seaside. This
location is geographically separated from the Presidio
installation, which may reduce the efficiency of police response to POM and crea
PS-3A: Develop a regional training institute for
fire and emergency medical services training.

WQQ-1: There is concern regarding the limited
availability of potable water supplies in the North
County Study Area.

The ongoing drought in California, along with the
impacts associated with regulatory mandated
changes to sources of raw water for the North County
Study Area is severely limiting the availability of
potable water. Local jurisdictions and military
installations are challenged to ensure adequate water
supply to meet current demands. This constrains
future economic development and military mission
expansion.

WQQ-1A: Investigate opportunities for use of
water allocation associated with the former Fort
Ord to support new Army missions or mission
expansion.

WQQ-1B: Work with the Monterey Peninsula
Water Management District, Monterey One
Water (M1W), CalAM, and MCWD to expand the
near/midterm water supply portfolio of
technology-based regional solutions.

WQQ-1C: Pursue use of more recycled water.

WQQ-1D: Use of Aquifer Storage and Recovery.

WQQ-1E: Explore opportunities for a small-scale
desalination project.

WQQ-1F: Partner with jurisdictions and
environmental organizations to continue to
enhance water conservation efforts.

WQQ-2: The requirement for water-use credits
impacts future economic development and
WQQ-2A: Consider additional flexibility in the
transfer of water-use credits to enable
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 11, Packet Page 203 military operations in the North County Study
Area.

In an effort to ensure current water supplies can meet
current and near-future demands, the MPWMD and
affected jurisdictions have implemented regulations
that require the availability of water use credits for
new/modified water usage. This requirement impacts
economic development and military installation
development in the region.
sustainable and equitable development of
requisite regional affordable housing supply.

WQQ-2B: Enact the use of defense reserve
water rights for workforce housing.

WQQ-2C: Implement separate water allocation
for NSAM (Navy), POM (Army) and U.S. Coast
Guard facilities.

WQQ-3: There are concerns regarding the
groundwater contamination cleanup at the
former Fort Ord site.

WQQ-3A: Evaluate the need for additional
groundwater production wells.

Table 2: South County Issues and Possible Strategies
Issues Possible Strategies
COM-1: There is limited established routine
communication between military installations
and surrounding communities.

While there is generally good communication and
coordination between military installations and
neighboring community governments, not all
processes are formalized. This could lead to
inconsistent planning and coordination when there
are changes in staff at military installations or local governments.

COM-1A: The region should consider establishing
a regional working group and/or ask local
communities to monitor CUS implementation and
address future compatibility findings that may arise
within southern Monterey County and north San
Luis Obispo County.

COM-1B: The Monterey Regional Implementation
Working Group and/or local communities should
consider developing a charter for the Monterey
Regional Implementation Working Group
COM-1C: Formalize communication between
Camp Roberts, Fort Hunter Liggett, and
surrounding communities.

COM-1D: Enhanced Camp Roberts and FHL
Outreach Program.

COM-2: There is no standing forum for
coordination between military installations and
surrounding communities.

There is currently no standing, regular forum that is
dedicated to coordination between military
installations and the surrounding communities.

COM-2A: Establish procedures for plan review and
comment.

COM-2B: Refer NEPA/CEQA documents to local
jurisdictions.

COM-2C: Create an interactive web-based GIS
portal for regional coordination that is hosted by a
regional council of governments.

CR-1: Concern with differing Tribal consultation
requirements.

Federal and California requirements for consulting
with American Indian Tribes can be different
depending on the government agencies and public
organizations involved. This can impact how
cultural resource management activities are
handled for archeological sites and historic
CR-1A: Include American Indian Tribes in the
development review process.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 12, Packet Page 204 properties in the study area.

ED-1: There is potential for alternative energy
development in surrounding communities to
impact aviation and electromagnetic operations
at Camp Roberts and Fort Hunter Liggett.

Certain types of solar facilities have reflective
materials that can create glint and glare and impact
aviation and electromagnetic operations. If large
solar developments in the community are not
coordinated properly to identify potential impacts to
Camp Roberts and Fort Hunter Liggett,
incompatible types of solar facilities may be
constructed.

ED-1A: Require coordination with the Military
Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting
Clearinghouse.

FSC-1: Frequency encroachment potential at
Camp Roberts.

There is potential for electronic encroachment from
surrounding communities to impact the
military operations at Camp Roberts.

FSC-1A: Coordinate with military installations when
updating regional and local utility service plans.

HA-1: There is a concern about regional
housing affordability throughout the South
County Study Area.

Regional rent and home prices continue to increase
in the South County Study Area. Increasing
housing rents and prices could present challenges
for military personnel and other community
members when looking for housing.

HA-1A: Incorporate military housing information in
General Plan Housing Elements.

HA-1B: Establish a quarterly meeting between
military installations and the development
community to discuss military housing needs.

HA-2: There is a lack of housing availability in
the community to relative to military needs.

Camp Roberts has a lack of on-base housing,
which creates an issue of housing availability,
especially as Camp Roberts is located in a remote
location.

HA-2A: Communicate military housing needs.

IE-1: Intergovernmental Support Agreement
between the community and military.

The City of King City is actively pursuing an IGSA
with FHL for the operation of the FHL wastewater
treatment facility and has informally partnered with
FHL to provide extended rail transportation
infrastructure that would enhance the training and
readiness capabilities of FHL.

IE-1A: Recommend continued ongoing
collaboration to achieve IGSA for FHL wastewater
treatment facility.

LU-1: Growth in surrounding communities
could lead to land use encroachment on tank
trail from Camp Roberts to Fort Hunter Liggett.

There is potential for future growth in surrounding
communities to encroach the Camp Roberts and
FHL installation fence lines and tank trail that
connects Camp Roberts and Fort Hunter Liggett.

LU-1A: Consider developing Installation
Compatible Use Zone studies.

LU-1B: Develop a Military Activity Overlay Zone to
protect Tank Trail and other noise sensitive areas.

LU-1C: Acquire conservation easements.

LU-1D: Pursue a Sentinel Landscape designation.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 13, Packet Page 205 LU-1E: Align Monterey County agriculture
conservation program with military compatibility
goals.

LU-1F: Update general plans to include military
compatibility planning information and policies.

LU-1G: Consider including military review of
subdivision regulations.

LU-1H: Consider acquiring land outright via fee
simple acquisition for sellers who are willing.

LG-1: Potential for glint and glare from
development in the community to impact
operations at Camp Roberts.

Increased development in the surrounding
communities can lead to more materials that create
glint and glare. This can impact aviation nighttime
operations at Camp Roberts.

LG-1A: Develop lighting regulations.

LG-1B: Conduct a glare study about the use of
certain reflective building materials.

NOI-1: Potential noise concerns for the
community related to weapons firing at Camp
Roberts.

There have been noise complaints regarding
artillery fire at Camp Roberts. This could be an
increased issue if the mission changes at Camp
Roberts and if community encroachment continues
closer to Camp Roberts.

NOI-1A: Provide noise location data.

NOI-1B: Develop a Military Activity Overlay Zone to
noise sensitive areas.

NOI-1C: Develop real estate disclosure.

NOI-1D: Consider developing a voluntary
development sound attenuation
retrofit program.

NOI-1E: Request OLDCC to consider Camp
Roberts eligibility for its Community Noise
Mitigation program.

NOI-1F: Require a note to be recorded on a title to
real property as part of any discretionary
development permit or approval.

NOI-1G: Evaluate California Building Standards
Code for sound attenuation.

PT-1: Trespassing at Camp Roberts and Fort
Hunter Liggett creates safety and security
concerns.

There have been instances of public trespassing on
Camp Roberts, mostly due to community members
entering the installation for hunting and recreational
use of the river. The perimeter of Camp Roberts is
not fully fenced, which may create an environment
conducive to trespassing. This is also a safety
concern as there are areas with dud ammunition in
PT-1A: Increase public awareness about the risk of
trespassing onto Camp Roberts and Fort Hunter
Liggett.

PT-1B: Consider full increasing perimeter security
fence and signage.

PT-1C: Provide education of permitted visitors
(visiting outside of cantonment).

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 14, Packet Page 206 areas at Camp Roberts which have the potential to
explode if inadvertently disturbed.

PT-2: Trespassing onto Fort Hunter Liggett.

There have been incidences of trespassing onto
FHL through access along NacimientoFergusson Road and Juan Bautista de Anza Trail.

PT-2A: Post visible signage in areas where
trespassing occurs.

PT-2B: Apply for grants for trail improvements.

PT-2C: Provide education of permitted visitors
(visiting outside of the cantonment area).

PT-2D: Increase visibility of enforcement notices in
hunting areas.

RE-1: There is a concern regarding wildland
fires at Fort Hunter Liggett and Camp Roberts
and in the areas surrounding the installations.

The South County Study Area is in a semi-arid
climate zone that is relatively undeveloped. High
temperatures, minimal precipitation, and low
humidity during summer months along with
abundant vegetation that provides a natural fuel
load increase the risk of wildland fires.

RE-1A: Coordinate future updates to community
hazard mitigation plans.

RE-1B: Review and Update Mutual Aid
Agreements.

RE-1C: Coordinate fire suppression training.

RE-1D: Adopt Mechanical Thinning and Prescribed
Burn Techniques to reduce fuel load.

RE-1E: Partner with local American Indian Tribes
for regional wildfire planning.

RE-1F: Prepare a well-drilling / water line extension
/ Bambi-bucket dip stations project to provide pump
truck access to water to remote areas
along Nacimiento Road.

RE-1G: Continue to promote joint fire management
awareness program for the general public.

RE-2: Concern that the remote location of Fort
Hunter Liggett can create barriers to
recruitment efforts.

FHL is located in a remote area of southern
Monterey County. There are concerns that the
remote area in which FHL is located will create
barriers for retaining and recruiting personnel to
work at Fort Hunter Liggett.mended Strate
RE-2A: Communicate Army workforce needs.

RE-3: State-wide drought conditions create
resiliency concerns.

Drought conditions throughout California continue
to be an issue for military resiliency due to water
availability and increased wildfire risks.

RE-3A: Plan infrastructure improvements for water
resiliency.

RE-3B: Coordinate regionally for water availability.

RE-4: There is a need for power redundancy
and resiliency at military installations.

Power/energy redundancies are needed at Camp
Roberts to ensure that the installation remains
resilient into the future.

RE-4A: Develop a Military Installation Resiliency
Plan.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 15, Packet Page 207 RC-1: Inadequate width and poor roadway
conditions on Jolon Road negatively impact
access to Fort Hunter Liggett, rural
communities, and recreation/tourist attractions.

Jolon Road is the main road that provides access
to Fort Hunter Liggett, rural communities (e.g.,
Lockwood, Jolon), and recreation/tourist attractions
(e.g., Mission San Antonio de Padua, Lake San
Antonio, wineries/tasting rooms, campgrounds,
etc.). This road currently is inadequate for traffic
types and vehicle loads, creating potentially unsafe
access to Fort Hunter Liggett, and the surrounding
communities/areas.

RC-1A: Review potential for Defense Access Road
project.

RC-1B: Identify a project for Federal Lands Access
Program.

RC-1C: Prepare a project for Building Resilient
Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) application
for improvements to Jolon Road as a critical access
route for mutual emergency response support for
wildland fires and other emergencies.

RC-1D: Prepare a project for future Defense
Critical Infrastructure Program (DCIP) opportunities
to address roadway improvements.

RC-2: Poor roadway conditions on Airport Road
impacts access to the Paso Robles
Municipal Airport.

There are currently joint uses at the Paso Robles
Municipal Airport between the City and Camp
Roberts. The City expressed interest in expanding
joint use at the airport; however, the roadway
conditions of Airport Road need to be addressed to
support expanded joint use by the ARNG and City
of Paso Robles.

RC-2A: The City of Paso Robles should work with
Camp Roberts and the FAA for roadway
improvement funding.

In summary, staff recommends the City Council accept this presentation on the Final Administrative Draft Compatible Use Study.

Attachment:

Final Administrative Draft, Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study, April 2023 e: All Neighborhood Associations
All Business Associations
MRCUS Outreach List
Matrix, Larry Dotson
Erin Harwayne, DDA
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 16, Packet Page 208 Final Administrative Draft
April 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 17, Packet Page 209 This study was prepared under contract with the City of Monterey, California, with financial support from the Department of Defense Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation. The content reflects the views of the key Compatible Use Study partners involved in the development of this study and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Defense Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 18, Packet Page 210 Final Administrative Draft
April 2023
A
Prepared for
City of Monterey
Community Development
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Prepared by
Matrix Design Group, Inc.
2020 North Central Avenue, Suite 1140
Phoenix, AZ 85004
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 19, Packet Page 211 This page intentionally left blank.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 20, Packet Page 212 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study i
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Acronyms ................................................................................. vii

1. Introduction ...................................................................... 1-1

1.1. What is the Monterey Regional CUS?................................................................................ 1-3

1.2. Study Area..................................................................................................................... 1-4

1.3. What is Compatibility?.................................................................................................... 1-7

1.4. Why is Compatible Land Use Planning Important?.............................................................. 1-7

1.5. Project Timeline ............................................................................................................. 1-8

1.6. How to Use this Study ..................................................................................................... 1-8

1.7. Next Steps: Implementation Working Group...................................................................... 1-9

2. Stakeholder Engagement..................................................... 2-1

2.1. Stakeholders .................................................................................................................. 2-2

2.2. Working Groups ............................................................................................................ 2-6

2.3. Public Engagement....................................................................................................... 2-10

3. Military Installations Overview ............................................. 3-1

3.1. History of Military Installations in the Region ...................................................................... 3-2

3.2. Military Economic Importance .......................................................................................... 3-2

3.3. Installations Overview...................................................................................................... 3-4

3.4. Military History ............................................................................................................. 3-17

4. Community Overview .......................................................... 4-1

4.1 Community and Military Relationship ................................................................................ 4-3

4.2 North County Study Area................................................................................................. 4-6

4.3 South County Study Area............................................................................................... 4-30

5. Existing Tools.................................................................... 5-1

5.1 DoD Specific Tools ......................................................................................................... 5-2

5.2 Other Federal Tools ........................................................................................................ 5-7

5.3 Military Tools ............................................................................................................... 5-15

5.4 Military-related State Legislation and Programs ................................................................. 5-18

5.5 Other State Tools.......................................................................................................... 5-21

5.6 Regional Tools ............................................................................................................. 5-25

5.7 Local Tools .................................................................................................................. 5-27 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 21, Packet Page 213 ii Table of Contents

6. Compatibility Assessment ................................................... 6-1

6.1 Compatibility Findings Overview ..................................................................................... 6-2

6.2 North County Compatibility Findings................................................................................ 6-6

6.3 South County Compatibility Findings............................................................................... 6-79

7. Potential Implementation Strategies...................................... 7-1

7.1 Strategy Implementation Considerations ............................................................................ 7-2

7.2 How to Read the Strategies .............................................................................................. 7-3

7.3 North County Potential Strategies...................................................................................... 7-6

7.4 South County Potential Strategies.................................................................................... 7-44 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 22, Packet Page 214 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study iii
Table of Contents
Tables
Table 2.1 Monterey Regional CUS Stakeholders ....................................................................... 2-2 Table 2.2 Stakeholder Interviews Conducted ........................................................................... 2-4 Table 2.3 Working Group Members....................................................................................... 2-7 Table 4.1 Population Trends in the North County Study Area................................................... 4-13 Table 4.2 Projected Employment* Growth in the North County Study Area, 2020-2045............. 4-28 Table 4.3 Housing Trends and Forecasts in the North County Study Area.................................. 4-29 Table 4.4 Population Trends and Forecasts, South County Study Area....................................... 4-34 Table 4.5 Projected Employment Growth in the South County Study Area, 2045........................ 4-48 Table 4.6 Housing Unit Trends and Projections for the South County Study Area ....................... 4-49 Table 5.1 Local Military-related Plans and Programs - South County Study Area.......................... 5-28 Table 5.2 Local Military-related Plans and Programs - North County Study Area.......................... 5-29 Table 6.1 Active NSA Monterey Air Permits Issued by Monterey Bay Air Resources District ........... 6-9 Table 6.2 BAH Rates for the Monterey Peninsula, 2022 .......................................................... 6-23 Table 6.3 Rental Costs in the North County Study Area ........................................................... 6-24 Table 6.4 Median Household Income and Affordable Monthly Housing Costs, 2020.................. 6-25 Table 6.5 Increases in North County Study Area Housing Prices, 2018-2022 ............................ 6-26 Table 6.6 Housing Tenure in the North County Study Area, 2020............................................ 6-27 Table 6.7 Current Listings in the North County Study Area, 2022 ............................................ 6-28 Table 6.8 Housing Forecasts in the North County Study Area .................................................. 6-29 Table 6.9 Monterey Bay School District Enrollment ................................................................. 6-32 Table 6.10 Drone Registrations in the North County Study Area, Third Quarter, 2021 .................. 6-34 Table 6.11 Monterey Peninsula Water Management District Rainfall Data, 2018-2021................... 6-71 Table 6.12 MPWMD Water Supply Scenarios in AC-FT............................................................. 6-72 Table 6.13 Solar Facilities in the South County Study Area within San Luis Obispo County............ 6-83 Table 6.14 Housing Market Trends in the South County Study Area............................................ 6-87 Table 6.15 BAH Rates for the South County Study Area, 2022 .................................................. 6-88 Table 6.16 Median Household Income and Affordable Monthly Housing Costs in the South County Study Area, 2020 .............................................. 6-88 Table 6.17 Housing Tenure in the South County Study Area, 2020............................................ 6-89 Table 6.18 Current Listings in the South County Study Area Cities, 2022.................................... 6-89 Table 6.19 Housing Forecasts in the South County Study Area .................................................. 6-90 Table 6.20 Camp Roberts Vegetation Habitat ........................................................................ 6-105 Table 6.21 Fort Hunter Liggett Vegetation Habitat.................................................................. 6-105 Table 6.22 Wildland Fire Planning Tools by Jurisdiction.......................................................... 6-107 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 23, Packet Page 215 iv Table of Contents
Figures
Figure 1.1 North County Study Area ........................................................................................ 1-5 Figure 1.2 South County Study Area ........................................................................................ 1-6 Figure 1.3 Compatibility Factors .............................................................................................. 1-7 Figure 3.1 Economic Impact of Military Installations in the Study Area .......................................... 3-2 Figure 3.2 Employment Impacts of Military Installations in the Study Area ..................................... 3-3 Figure 3.3 Military-Related Population of Military Installations in the Study Area ............................. 3-3 Figure 3.4 Presidio of Monterey Location.................................................................................. 3-5 Figure 3.5 Ord Military Community and Defense Manpower Data Center Location......................... 3-8 Figure 3.6 Naval Support Activity Monterey Location................................................................ 3-10 Figure 3.7 Fort Hunter Liggett Location .................................................................................. 3-13 Figure 3.8 Camp Roberts Location......................................................................................... 3-16 Figure 4.1 North County Military Influence Areas...................................................................... 4-4 Figure 4.2 South County Military Influence Areas...................................................................... 4-5 Figure 4.3 Regional Growth Forecast 2010-2020, North County Study Area ............................... 4-14 Figure 4.4 Existing Land Use in the North County Study Area.................................................... 4-16 Figure 4.5 Zoning in the North County Study Area .................................................................. 4-18 Figure 4.6 Government Land Ownership, North County Study Area.......................................... 4-20 Figure 4.7 Nonattainment Areas Based on State Standards, 2019 North County Study Area......... 4-22 Figure 4.8 Air Quality (PM 2.5), North County Study Area........................................................ 4-23 Figure 4.9 Water Resources, North County Study Area ............................................................ 4-25 Figure 4.10 Population Change 2010-2019, South County Study Area ......................................... 4-35 Figure 4.11 Existing Land Use in the South County Study Area.................................................... 4-37 Figure 4.12 Future Land Use in the South County Study Area...................................................... 4-39 Figure 4.13 Government Land Ownership in the South County Study Area ................................... 4-41 Figure 4.14 Air Quality (PM 2.5), South County Study Area ....................................................... 4-44 Figure 4.15 South County Nonattainment Areas Based on State Standards, 2019 ......................... 4-45 Figure 4.16 Water Resources, South County Study Area............................................................. 4-47 Figure 6.1 Air Quality Status in North County Study Area ......................................................... 6-10 Figure 6.2 Air Quality (PM 2.5), North County Study Area........................................................ 6-11 Figure 6.3 Presidio of Monterey Military Influence Area............................................................ 6-15 Figure 6.4 NSA Monterey Military Influence Area .................................................................... 6-16 Figure 6.5 DMDC Military Influence Area ............................................................................... 6-17 Figure 6.6 Drive Time and Median Housing Values in the North County Study Area ................... 6-30 Figure 6.7 FAA Drone Restricted Airspace in the North County Study Area................................. 6-35 Figure 6.8 Wildland Fire Hazard Potential Across the North County Study Area ......................... 6-44 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 24, Packet Page 216 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study v
Table of Contents
Figure 6.9 Evacuation Routes in the North County Study Area................................................... 6-47 Figure 6.10 Shoreline Change in the North County Study Area................................................... 6-50 Figure 6.11 Future Coastal Hazards on Public and Military Facilities ............................................ 6-51 Figure 6.12 Drought Conditions within the Monterey Regional CUS Study Area ............................ 6-53 Figure 6.13 Traffic Points of Friction in the North County Study Area........................................... 6-58 Figure 6.14 Suspended MST Military Commuter Routes Map ...................................................... 6-61 Figure 6.15 MST 2022 Medium Concept Network .................................................................... 6-62 Figure 6.16 Water Management Districts and Water Suppliers in the North County Study Area ...... 6-69 Figure 6.17 Solar Facilities and Irradiance in Project Study Area ................................................. 6-84 Figure 6.18 Tank Trail and Future Land Use .............................................................................. 6-93 Figure 6.19 Light Pollution in the South County Study Area ........................................................ 6-96 Figure 6.20 Camp Roberts Large Arms Noise and Land Use..................................................... 6-100 Figure 6.21 Wildfire Hazard Potential Across the South County Study Area................................ 6-108 Figure 6.22 Estimated Drive Time to Military Bases in the South County Study Area...................... 6-110 Figure 6.23 U.S. Drought Monitor, California .......................................................................... 6-111 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 25, Packet Page 217 vi Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 26, Packet Page 218 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study vii
Acronyms
Acronyms
A
ACUB Army Compatible Use Buffer
ADT Average Daily Traffic
AHAS Avian Hazard Advisory System
AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act
ALUC Advisory Land Use Committee
AMBAG Association of Monterey Bay
Area Governments
APCD Air Pollution Control Districts
AQ Air Quality
ARNG Army National Guard
ARPA Archaeological Resources
Protection Act
ASR Aquifer Storage and Recovery
AT Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
AT/FP Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
B
BAH Basic Allowance for Housing
BLM Bureau of Land Management
BRIC Building Resilient Infrastructure
and Communities
C
CAA Clean Air Act
CalAm California American Water Company
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and
Fire Protection
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CARB California Air Resources Board
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CDWR California Department of Water
Resources
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act
CFCP California Farmland Conservancy
Program
CO Commanding Officer
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMLUCA California Military Land Use
Compatibility Analyst
CMMA California Master Mutual Aid
COG Council of Governments
COM Communication/Coordination
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CR Cultural Resources
CUS Compatible Use Study
CWA Clean Water Act
CWCG California Wildfire Coordinating Group
CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act
D
DCIP Defense Critical Infrastructure Program
DLIFLC Defense Language Institute Foreign
Language Center
DMDC Defense Manpower Data Center
DoD Department of Defense
DoDI DoD Instruction
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
DRMI Defense Resource Management Institute
E
ED Energy Development
EMI Electromagnetic Interference
EMS Emergency Medical Service
EOC Emergency Operations Center
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Endangered Species Act
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 27, Packet Page 219 viii Acronyms
F
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FEMA Federal Emergency
Management Agency
FHL Fort Hunter Liggett
FLAP Federal Lands Access Program
FLPMA Federal Land Policy and
Management Act
FNMOC Fleet Numerical Meteorology and
Oceanography Center
FSC Frequency Spectrum Capacity
FSI Frequency Spectrum
Impedance/Interference
G
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agencies
GSMA Groundwater Sustainment
Management Act
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plans
H
HA Housing Availability
HCD Housing and Community Development
HEMTT Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck
HMP Hazard Mitigation Plan
HQ Headquarters
HUD U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development
I
ICRMP Integrated Cultural Resources
Management Plan
ICUZ Installation Compatible Use Zone
IGSA Intergovernmental Service Agreement
INRMP Integrated Natural Resources
Management Plan
IE Infrastructure Extensions
J
JLUS Joint Land Use Study
L
LAANC Low Altitude Authorization and
Notification Capability
LAS Land/Air Space Competition
LCA Land Conservation Agreement
LG Light and Glare
LU Land Use
LUCP Land Use Compatibility Plan
M
MAOZ Military Activity Overlay Zone
MBARD Monterey Bay Air Resources District
MCCWPP Monterey County Community Wildfire
Protection Plan
MCFCA Monterey County Fire Chiefs
Association
MCWRA The Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
MCWD Marina Coast Water District
MCECD Monterey County Emergency
Communications Department
MIA Military Influence Area
MILES Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement
Systems
MIR Military Installation Resiliency
MJHMP Multi-Jurisdictional
Hazard Mitigation Plan
MOA Memorandum of Agreement
MOS Military Occupational Specialty
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MPWMD Monterey Peninsula
Water Management District
MST Monterey-Salinas Transit
MTBP Mass Transportation Benefit Programs
MTC‐H Maneuver Training Center‐Heavy
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 28, Packet Page 220 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study ix
Acronyms
N
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCCAB North Central Coast Air Basin
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
NOI Noise
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System
NPS Naval Postgraduate School
NRL/MRY Naval Research Laboratory
Marine Meteorology
NSAM Naval Support Activity Monterey
O
OLDCC Office of Local Defense
Community Cooperation
OMC Ord Military Community
ONMP Operational Noise Management Plan
OPR Office of Planning and Research
P
PERSEC Defense Personnel and Security
Research Center
PFAS Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
PM Particulate Matter
PMSA Presidio Municipal Services Agency
POM Presidio of Monterey
PS Public Service
PT Public Trespassing
PWG Policy Working Group
R
RA Restricted Area
RC Roadway Capacity
RE Resiliency
REPI Readiness and Environment Protection
Integration
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Allocation
RTS‐M Regional Training Site‐Maintenance
S
SA Safety
SB Senate Bill
SDZ Surface Danger Zone
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
SFD Seaside Fire Department
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act
SIPs State Implementation Plans
SLO San Luis Obispo
SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Council
of Governments
SPD Seaside Police Department
SRP Sustainable Range Program
T
TAMC Transportation Agency for
Monterey County
TIP Transportation Incentive Program
TWG Technical Working Group
TSC Training Support Center
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 29, Packet Page 221 x Acronyms
U
UAS Unmanned Aircraft System
UC University of California
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
U.S. United States
USAHAS U.S. Avian Hazard Advisory System
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
V
VO Vertical Obstructions
W
WUI Wildland Urban Interface
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 30, Packet Page 222 Final Administrative Draft 1-1
Introduction
Military installations are critical to local economies, generating thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in economic activity and tax revenue annually. An increase in incompatible uses or development that affects or is affected by military operations — often referred to as encroachment — has been a leading impact to military readiness capabilities at military sites across the country. It has resulted in the realignment of mission-critical components to different installations. Identifying and mitigating encroachment around military installations in Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties can help sustain important military missions vital to regional economies and national security.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 31, Packet Page 223 1-2 Final Administrative Draft Introduction
Inside Chapter 1…

1.1. What is the Monterey Regional CUS?............... 1-3

1.2. Study Area ..................................................... 1-4

1.3. What is Compatibility? .................................... 1-7

1.4. Why is Compatible Land Use Planning
Important? ..................................................... 1-7

1.5. Project Timeline.............................................. 1-8

1.6. How to Use this Study ..................................... 1-8

1.7. Next Steps: Implementation Working Group..... 1-9
Existing types and levels of encroachment are key
factors that are evaluated by the Department of
Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies when
considering strategic stationing of future missions or
the realignment of military assets from one
installation to another.

To protect the missions of military facilities, the
health of regional economies, and industries reliant
upon those facilities and economies, encroachment
must be addressed through mutual information
sharing, collaborative action, and joint planning
among installations and local communities. To this
end, the DoD Office of Local Defense Community
Cooperation (OLDCC) developed the compatible
use program. This program provides support and
funding for defense communities across the nation
to identify and assess encroachment concerns
around military installations and to develop
strategies and tools to address these concerns. Tools
such as enhanced communication processes,
strategic partnerships, and updates to local policies
and ordinances can facilitate regional compatibility
with continued military presence. Once the
Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study (CUS) is
complete, the communities, military installations,
and other partners will work together to consider
future projects, which have not yet been developed,
considering Study recommendations to ensure
mission sustainability and the military readiness of
regional bases.

The Monterey Regional CUS identifies existing
compatibility issues and suggests ways to mitigate
them, as well as to prevent future issues while
strengthening coordination between the military
facilities in the region and neighboring communities.

The CUS provides a set of recommended strategies
for use by local jurisdictions, agencies, and
organizations in the Study Area to guide their
future compatibility planning efforts. However, the
CUS is not an
adopted plan. The
CUS is background
information for future
actions, which public
agencies have not
yet approved,
adopted, or funded.

For instance, local
jurisdictions may use recommended strategies to
develop and guide future amendments to general
plans and zoning ordinances and to assist in the
review of development proposals in the Study
Area. Military installations in the two counties can
use the background information when interacting
with local jurisdictions on future projects and
managing internal planning processes with a
compatibility-based approach.

Compatibility, in
relation to military
readiness, can be
defined as the balance
or compromise between
community needs and
interests and military
needs and interests.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 32, Packet Page 224 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 1-3 Introduction

1.1. What is the
Monterey Regional
CUS?
In recognition of the close relationships that should
exist between installations and adjacent communities,
the OLDCC implemented the compatible use
program to mitigate existing and future conflicts and
to enhance communication and coordination among
all affected stakeholders. This program aims to
preserve the economic viability and quality of life of
all community and military stakeholders.

The Monterey Regional CUS is a community-led
project that is funded through the OLDCC. The
Monterey Regional CUS is a collaborative effort
between the community, state and federal
agencies, and other interested stakeholders to
develop appropriate actions to address
compatibility and shared resources in the region.

The CUS is ultimately a collection of information
to help make more informed decisions in the
future and a set of recommendations that are
tailored to each stakeholder.

Monterey Regional CUS Overview
The Monterey Regional CUS is a planning tool
developed through the collaborative efforts of a set
of local, regional, and state stakeholders for
managing growth around military installations in
Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties and for
mitigating existing and future land use conflicts and
resource competition between these installations and
surrounding communities. The stakeholders involved
include local, state, and federal government
officials; government and non-governmental
agencies and organizations; residents; tribal
communities; local property and business owners;
and the military. Chapter 2 discusses the
stakeholders in more detail. Stakeholders had the
opportunity to be involved in the development and
review of the CUS by visiting the virtual open house,
attending public workshops, and reviewing the
Public Draft CUS.

The intent of the CUS is to enhance working
relationships between military installations and
nearby stakeholders and to encourage them to work
as a team to identify, reduce, and prevent
encroachment issues between current and future
military missions, on the one hand, and growth and
development in neighboring communities, on the
other. To do this, the CUS process culminates in a
set of ideas for achieving:
n Compatible development
n Improved communication
n Improved relationships between the
installations and neighboring communities,
now and in the future
This CUS is important for preserving long-term
compatibility between military installations and
surrounding areas, where it will benefit both the
military and the surrounding region by offering
recommendations for:
n Protecting the health and safety of nearby
residents and workers
n Enhancing a cooperative spirit between military
installations and local communities that, in turn,
promotes comprehensive community planning
with attention to compatibility
n Integrating the development policies, plans,
and regulations of local jurisdictions and land
management agencies with the plans of
military installations
This CUS effort was funded through a grant from
the OLDCC with additional contributions provided
by the City of Monterey, including matching funds
and project management. While the OLDCC was
the primary source of funding, the Monterey
Regional CUS was produced by and for the local
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 33, Packet Page 225 1-4 Final Administrative Draft Introduction
stakeholders. The City of Monterey served as the
managing agency for the project, with support
from regional partners and stakeholders.

Goals and Objectives
The primary goal of the CUS is to gather and
evaluate information to reduce potential future land
use and resource conflicts between the military
installations in Monterey County and northern
portions of San Luis Obispo County and the
surrounding communities, while accommodating
and promoting new compatible growth and
economic development. Three objectives are
instrumental in achieving the CUS goals.

Understanding. Bring together
community and military representatives
to discuss compatibility issues in an
open forum that considers both
community and military perspectives and needs.

Understanding is facilitated through a cohesive
education and outreach program that increases
public awareness regarding land use planning and
provides opportunities for input.

Collaboration. Encourage cooperative,
coordinated land use and resource
planning among the military and
surrounding communities so that
incompatible community growth and development can
be avoided and ways of reducing operational impacts
on lands in the CUS Study Area can be identified.

Actions. Provide a set of mutually
supported tools, activities, and
procedures through which local
jurisdictions, agencies, the military, and
other stakeholders can implement appropriate
recommendations that are developed during the CUS.

1.2. Study Area
The project Study Area for the Monterey Regional
CUS covers two locations identified as North County,
which includes northern Monterey County, and
South County, which includes southern Monterey
County and a portion of north San Luis Obispo
County. See Figures 1.1 and 1.2.

The North County Study Area includes the following
military installations:
n Presidio of Monterey
n Defense Manpower Data Center Monterey Bay
n Naval Support Activity Monterey
The South County Study Area includes the following
military installations:
n Fort Hunter Liggett
n Camp Roberts
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 34, Packet Page 226 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 1-5 Introduction
Figure 1.1 North County Study Area
Monterey
Regional Airport
Presidio of
Monterey
Naval Research Laboratory
Marine Meteorology Division
and
Fleet Numerical Meteorology
and Oceanography Center
Defense
Language
Institute
Naval Support
Activity Monterey
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Ord Military
Community
La Mesa Military
Housing Complex
Presidio of
Monterey
Defense
Manpower
Data Center
M o n t e r e y
C o u n t y
P a c i f i c O c e a n
¬«1
¬«68
¬«218
¬«68
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Del Rey
Oaks
Marina
Pacific Grove
Sand
City
Seaside
Monterey
Forest
Asilomar
Prescott
Pacific Grove Carmel
Canyon Del Rey
Franklin
Pearl
Scenic
El Dorado
Casanova
Fremont
Pine Carpenter
S unset
Plumas
Central
Yosemite
Iris Canyon
San Carlos
Junipero
Munras
Reservation
Kimball
Congress
San Pablo
Military
La Salle
Noche Buena
Ocean View
Hilby
Lopez
Pacific
Josselyn Canyon
Broadway
Mar Vista
David
Del Monte
Carmel Valley
Lighthouse
Skyline
Aguajito
17 Mile
South
Legend
Department of Defense Property
Monterey
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Del Rey Oaks
Marina
Pacific Grove
Sand City
Seaside
State Route
Major Road
Water
0 ½ 1
Miles Source: US Census. USGS.

City of Monterey
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 35, Packet Page 227 1-6 Final Administrative Draft Introduction
Figure 1.2 South County Study Area
Camp Roberts
Fort Hunter
Liggett
M o n t e r e y
C o u n t y
S a n L u i s O b i s p o
C o u n t y
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
Bradley
Cambria
Lake
Nacimiento
Lockwood
Oak
Shores
Pine
Canyon
San Ardo
San Lucas
San Miguel
San
Simeon
Templeton
Martinus
Corner
Heritage
Ranch
Lake San Antonio
Lake Nacimiento
El Paso de Robles
(Paso Robles)
King City
£¤101
¬«198
¬«25
¬«46
¬«1
Green Valley
Airline
Vine
Bitterwater
Nacimiento Lake
Hare Canyon
Lockwood Jolon
Adelaida
Oasis
River
Vineyard
Peach Tree
Santa Rosa Creek
Lockwood San Lucas
Indian Valley
Cattlemen
Interlake
Jolon
Sargents
Legend
Department of Defense
Installation
County Boundary
El Paso de Robles (Paso
Robles) city
King City
Unincorporated Community
US Highway
State Route
Major Road
Water
0 1 2 3 4 5
Miles Source: US Census. USGS.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 36, Packet Page 228 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 1-7 Introduction

1.3. What is
Compatibility?
In relation to military readiness, compatibility can be defined as the balance or compromise between
community needs and interests and military needs
and interests. The goal of compatibility planning is to promote a collaborative environment in which both
community and military entities communicate and
coordinate in identifying compatibility concerns and
implementing mutually supportive actions that allow
both parties to achieve their objectives. This
collaborative approach provides the context in which
policies and actions can be developed and
recommended through the CUS Implementation Plan.

Many variables determine whether military and
community plans, programs, and activities are
compatible or not. A set of 26 compatibility
factors (see Figure 1.3), or general types of
compatibility problems was used during the
development of the CUS to identify, assess, and
establish the specific set of compatibility issues
that are occurring or could occur in the CUS
Study Area. The specific compatibility issues
identified during the CUS are presented and
assessed in Chapter 6: Compatibility Assessment.

Figure 1.3 Compatibility Factors

1.4. Why is Compatible
Land Use Planning
Important?
Military installations and nearby communities are
often separated by a physical boundary, but they
also may share natural and man-made resources,
including land, water, airspace, and infrastructure
such as transportation networks. Because resources
are shared, the activities or actions of one entity can unintentionally impact another and create conflicts
— despite the many positive interactions among
local jurisdictions, agencies, and the military.

As communities develop and expand in response to
growth and market demands, there is a potential for
incompatible development to be located closer to
military installations and associated training and
operational areas. New development that is not
properly evaluated for compatibility can generate new
or exacerbate existing land use conflicts and other
compatibility issues. This is referred to as
encroachment. Encroachment can have negative
impacts on community safety and economic
development and can impact the sustainability of
military activities and readiness. Therefore, addressing encroachment issues is currently one of the military’s
greatest operational challenges nationwide.

Military installations, local communities, agencies,
and other stakeholders should collaborate to protect
the long-term viability of existing and future military missions. Working together also enhances the health
of community economies before incompatible uses
become an issue.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 37, Packet Page 229 1-8 Final Administrative Draft Introduction

1.5. Project Timeline
The figure below shows the project process
and timeline.

1.6. How to Use
this Study
The strategies presented in Chapter 7:

Implementation Plan should be considered for
implementation as part of future projects that may be
approved, adopted, or funded. Strategies should be
executed when feasible to prevent future
encroachment and incompatible uses near military
installations as well as mitigate to the extent possible any existing land use, shared resource, or other
types of compatibility issue. The Implementation
Plan is the crux of the CUS and provides a toolbox
of planning strategies to ensure that relationships
between the military and surrounding communities
remain strong and mutually beneficial. Each strategy
identifies key participants and partners for
successful implementation and suggested timelines
to aid in implementation. It is important to
understand that the CUS is a recommended set of
strategies and tools, not an adopted plan.

Coordinated and collaborative future efforts by the
Monterey Regional CUS partners will be required to
successfully carry out the strategies.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 38, Packet Page 230 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 1-9 Introduction

1.7. Next Steps:

Implementation
Working Group
The CUS will be successful if the recommendations
are considered as part of future implementation
activities. As further described in Chapter 7:

Implementation Plan, a Monterey Regional CUS
Implementation Working Group should be
established after the completion of the CUS. The
Working Group should contain representatives from
each stakeholder group or organization that
participated in the CUS, with additional members
included as necessary to address future issues or
concerns that may arise. Many of the strategies
developed in the implementation plan are designed
to be integrated into existing programs as they
evolve. Enhancing existing communication
processes and establishing new ones, amending
zoning tools, and updating long-range planning
policies are some of the most cost-effective ways to
ensure compatible development in the long term.

The Monterey Regional CUS is meant to be a living
document, so certain strategies may need to be
revisited as local circumstances and applicable laws
change. For more information on the
Implementation Plan, see Chapter 7.

Ultimately, in defense communities across the United
States, improved communication and collaboration
on compatible land use planning often leads to
ancillary collaboration between local communities
and military installations on economic development,
housing, education, technology transfer, and job
growth — ultimately creating the foundation for
“Strong Communities, Strong Bases.”
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 39, Packet Page 231 1-10 Final Administrative Draft Introduction
This page intentionally left blank.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 40, Packet Page 232 Final Administrative Draft 2-1
Stakeholder Engagement
This chapter describes the stakeholder and public
engagement efforts that occurred throughout the
development of the Monterey Regional CUS and how the
input was used to identify compatibility issues and strategies to address them.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 41, Packet Page 233 2-2 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement
Inside Chapter 2…

2.1. Stakeholders .................................................. 2-2

2.2. Working Groups............................................. 2-6

2.3. Public Engagement ....................................... 2-10

2.1. Stakeholders
Stakeholder Identification
An early step in any study is the identification of
stakeholders. Involving stakeholders at the
beginning of the CUS process is instrumental in the
identification of compatibility issues that need to be
addressed and can be resolved through the
collaborative development of mutually beneficial
strategies. Stakeholders include individuals, groups,
organizations, and government entities interested in,
affected by, or affecting compatibility issues and the
outcome of the CUS project. Stakeholders identified
for the CUS are listed in Table 2.1 and included, but
were not limited to, the following:
n Local jurisdictions
n Military installations
n Local, regional, state, and federal planning,
regulatory, and resource management agencies
n Non-governmental organizations
n Other special interest groups
n Business and commercial property owners and
all residents
Table 2.1 Monterey Regional CUS Stakeholders
Public
Residents
Property Owners
Business Owners
Neighborhood
Associations
Media Outlets
Cities / Towns
City of Del Rey Oaks
City of King City
City of Marina
City of Monterey
City of Pacific Grove
City of Paso Robles
City of Seaside
Counties
Monterey County San Luis Obispo
County
Tribal Communities
Esselen Tribe of
Monterey County
KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of
Ohlone-Costanoan
Indians of the Big Sur
Rancheria
Picayune Rancheria of
the Chukchansi Indians
Salinan Tribe of San
Luis Obispo and
Monterey Counties
Santa Rosa Indian
Community of the
Santa Rosa RancheriaTochi Yokut
Santa Ynez Band of
Chumash
Table Mountain
Rancheria
Tule River Indian Tribe
of the Tule River
Reservation
Tuolumne Band of MeWuk Indians
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 42, Packet Page 234 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-3 Stakeholder Engagement
Offices/Agencies
Agricultural Land Trust
Association of Monterey
Bay Governments
Bureau of Land
Management

CAL FIRE
California Department
of Fish and Wildlife
California Native Plant
Society
California State
University Monterey Bay
Caltrans
California Department
of Fish and Wildlife
California Highway
Patrol
California State
University Monterey Bay
California Department
of Parks and Recreation
County Fire
Departments
Community Hospital of
Monterey Peninsula
San Luis Obispo Sheriff
Farm Bureau
Grower-Shipper
Association of Central
California
Hesperia Hall
Hourglass Project
Mee Hospital
Middlebury Institute of
International Studies
Monterey Regional
Airport
Monterey Bay Air
Resources District
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Monterey Bay Defense
Alliance
Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary
Monterey County Sheriff
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Monterey Peninsula
Airport District
Monterey Peninsula
College
Monterey Peninsula
Unified School District
Monterey-Salinas
Transit
National Weather
Service Forecast Office
Office of Local Defense
Community
Cooperation
Paso Robles Airport
Pebble Beach
Community Services
District
Salinas Groundwater
Management Agency
San Antonio Unified
School District
San Miguel Community
Services District
Santa Lucia
Improvements
Association Summer
Tract
SLO Air Pollution
Control District
SLO Council of
Governments
South Monterey County
Rural Coalition
Transportation Agency
for Monterey County
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service
U.S. Forest
Service/National
Forest Service
Vintners and Growers
Association
Military
Presidio of Monterey
Defense Language
Institute Foreign
Language Center
Defense Manpower Data
Center
Naval Support Activity
Monterey
Naval Postgraduate
School
Naval Research
Laboratory Marine
Meteorology Division
Fleet Numerical
Meteorology and
Oceanography Center
Fort Hunter Liggett
U.S. Army Reserve
Camp Roberts
Maneuver Training
Center
California National
Guard
U.S. Army Signal
Activity
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 43, Packet Page 235 2-4 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Interviews
Stakeholder interviews allow representatives of
organizations to learn about the CUS and provide
input on its development. The interviews for the CUS
occurred from June through September, with 80
people representing 15 organizations participating.

The stakeholder groups that participated in the
interviews are listed in Table 2.2. All interviews were conducted virtually due to the Covid pandemic.

One-on-one interviews allowed for more private,
in-depth conversations than would larger group
settings and created an environment in which
people could discuss compatibility issues and
concerns openly. The interview process provided
opportunities to further clarify project components
of specific concern to stakeholders and often
pointed to where interests either align or could lead
to conflict. The interviews also pointed to
opportunities for compromise and mutually
beneficial solutions. The process was further integral
to data collection in helping to identify all available data and reports, thereby supplementing formal
requests for information. The interviews ultimately
assisted the Study in five important ways:
n Expanded stakeholder engagement
n Facilitated and enhanced
stakeholder collaboration
n Enhanced communication between the Project
Team, community leaders, and stakeholders
n Facilitated identification of compatibility issues
for further assessment by the working groups
n Increased stakeholder understanding of
compatibility issues and potential solutions
Through the interviews, issues related to
communication, housing, land use, roadway
conditions, and other variables were identified.

Table 2.2 Stakeholder Interviews Conducted
Meeting Organization/Title
Presidio of Monterey
Public Works and
Master Planning
Directorate of Public Works
Chief Master Plans
Environmental
Environmental Protection
Specialist/Water Program
Manager
Defense Language
Institute Foreign
Language Center
Space Management Specialist
Energy and Utilities Energy and Utilities Manager
Environmental
Environmental Planner (NEPA
Coordinator)
Cultural Resources Program
Manager
Defense Language
Institute Foreign
Language Center
DLIFLC Chief of Staff
Public Works Director of Public Works
Command Group
Garrison Commander
Deputy to the Garrison
Commander
Defense Manpower Data Center
Defense Manpower
Data Center
Facility Manager
Naval Support Activity Monterey
Commanding
Officer, Community
Planning,
Operations

NSAM CO
NSAM Operations Officer
Community Planning Liaison
Officer
Environmental and
Facilities
NSAM Environmental Director
NSAM Public Works Officer
NSAM Deputy Public Works
Officer
Community Planning Liaison
Officer
Fort Hunter Liggett
Command Group
Commander
Deputy Garrison Commander
Chief of Training
Planning Directorate of Public Works
Camp Roberts
Environmental and
Base Operations
Sr. Env. Scientist
Base Operations Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 44, Packet Page 236 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-5 Stakeholder Engagement
Table 2.2 Stakeholder Interviews Conducted
Meeting Organization/Title
Communities
City of Del Rey
Oaks
Police Chief
Mayor
City Manager
Public Works
City of Pacific
Grove
Interim Community Development
Department Director
Public Works Director
Mayor
Fire Chief
City of Monterey
Community Development
Director
City Manager
City of Marina
Public Works Director
Planner
Mayor
Fire Chief
Assistant City Manager
Police Chief
City Manager
City of Paso Robles
Community Development
Director
Chief of Fire and Emergency
Services
Economic Development Manager
Finance Manager
City Manager
City Planner
Police Department, Commander,
Support Services Division
Community Services Director
City of Salinas
Planning Manager
Assistant Chief of Police
Public Works Director
Fire Chief
Table 2.2 Stakeholder Interviews Conducted
Meeting Organization/Title
Communities
City of Seaside
Mayor
Acting City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Public Works Director/City
Engineer
Fire Division Chief
Public Works Superintendent
Acting Chief of Police
Fire Chief
King City
Community Development
Director
Assistant Planner
Mayor
City Manager
Police Chief
City Engineer
San Luis Obispo
County
Public Works
Deputy Director of Public Works
Fire Marshal – Battalion Chief,

CAL FIRE
Development Services Manager,
Public Works
Public Works
Monterey County
Deputy Fire Chief, Monterey
County Regional Fire District
Associate Planner
Monterey County,
District 5
Supervisor, District 5
Chief of Staff, Supervisor Adams
District 5
Monterey County,
District 4
Supervisor, District 4
Monterey County,
District 3
Supervisor, District 3
San Luis Obispo
County
Director of Planning & Building
Water Agencies
Monterey One Water
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
Marina Coast Water District
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 45, Packet Page 237 2-6 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement

2.2. Working Groups
The CUS was guided by four working groups — a
Policy Working Group and a Technical Working
Group for each of the two locations comprising the
Study Area. Each working group included
stakeholders with diverse backgrounds and interests.

The purpose of these working groups was to provide
feedback, suggestions, and guidance pertaining to
their area and for members to serve as liaisons to
their respective groups.

Working Group Responsibilities
These working groups were important in developing
and maintaining relationships between key
stakeholders, interested community members, and
the CUS Project Team.

Working Group Roles and
Responsibilities
The figure below outlines working group members’
roles and responsibilities.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 46, Packet Page 238 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-7 Stakeholder Engagement
Policy Working Group (PWG)
The PWG included elected officials, or their
designees, and military installation leaders. The
PWG was important to the CUS process in
providing key insights into local issues and helping
to tailor all recommendations to meet local needs
and capabilities. The PWG was responsible for the
overall CUS direction, approval of drafts, including
a Working Group Draft and Public Draft CUS, and
final written reports, and approval of policy
recommendations. Although many agencies were
invited to participate in the PWG, not all agencies
participated. Agencies were each responsible for
deciding who, if anyone, would participate in the
working groups.

Technical Working Group (TWG)
The TWG consisted of technical subject matter
experts from participating jurisdictions, staff from
participating military installations, and
representatives of other stakeholder organizations.

The TWG provided technical expertise on the
compatibility issues and recommendations, thereby
ensuring that information is accurate,
comprehensive, and appropriately characterized.

This was done through TWG meetings,
correspondence, and the review of draft materials,
including a Working Group draft CUS. The TWG
members also served as liaisons for their respective
organizations and for representatives on the PWG,
reporting project progress and relaying information
developed through the CUS process.

Working Group Members
The participants for each working group are
identified in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3 Working Group Members
Policy Working Group Technical Working Group
North County Members
Congressman
Panetta's Office
City of Del Rey
Oaks
City of Marina
City of Monterey
City of Pacific
Grove
City of Salinas
City of Seaside
Monterey Bay
Defense Alliance
Monterey County
Pebble Beach
Community
Services District
Defense
Manpower Data
Center
Presidio of
Monterey
Defense Language
Institute Foreign
Language Center
Naval Support
Activity Monterey
Agricultural Land Trust
Association of Monterey Bay
Governments
BLM-Fort Ord National
Monument

CAL FIRE
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
California Department of Parks
and Recreation
California State University
Monterey Bay
Caltrans
City of Del Rey Oaks
City of Marina
City of Monterey
City of Pacific Grove
City of Seaside
Defense Language Institute
Foreign Language Center
Defense Manpower Data
Center
Esselen Tribe of Monterey
County
KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of
Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of
the Big Sur Rancheria
Marina Coast Water District
Middlebury Institute of
International Studies
Monterey Airport
Monterey Bay Air Resources
District
Monterey Bay Defense Alliance
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 47, Packet Page 239 2-8 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement
Table 2.3 Working Group Members
Policy Working Group Technical Working Group
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Monterey Peninsula Unified
School District
Monterey-Salinas Transit
Naval Support Activity
Monterey
Picayune Rancheria of the
Chukchansi Indians
Presidio of Monterey
Salinas Groundwater
Management Agency
Salinan Tribe of San Luis
Obispo and Monterey Counties
Santa Rosa Indian Community
of the Santa Rosa RancheriaTochi Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Transportation Agency for
Monterey County
Tule River Indian Tribe of the
Tule River Reservation
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk
Indians
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Forest Service
Table 2.3 Working Group Members
Policy Working Group Technical Working Group
South County Members
Office of
Congressman
Panetta
City of King City
City of Paso
Robles
Monterey Bay
Defense Alliance
Monterey County
San Luis Obispo
(SLO) County
Army Reserve
Camp Roberts
Maneuver Training
Center
Fort Hunter
Liggett
Agricultural Land Trust

CAL FIRE
Caltrans
Camp Roberts
County of Monterey
County of San Luis Obispo
City of Paso Robles
Fort Hunter Liggett
City of King City
Marina Coast Water District
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary
Monterey County Water
Resources Agency
Monterey-Salinas Transit
Presidio of Monterey Enclave
at Camp Roberts
Santa Ynez Band of Chumash
Salinan Tribe of San Luis
Obispo and Monterey Counties
SLO Air Pollution Control
District
SLO Council of Governments
U.S. Army Signal Activity
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Forest Service
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 48, Packet Page 240 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-9 Stakeholder Engagement
Working Group Meetings
The PWG and TWG meetings were held virtually
throughout the CUS process to ensure that issues
were accurately identified and appropriately
addressed through collaborative action. The four
PWG and TWG groups held separate meetings after
the initial kickoff.

PWG/TWG Meeting #1: Project Kick-Off
— April 2021
The key objectives of the project kick-off
meeting follow:
n Outline the CUS goals.
n Educate working group members about the
CUS and study process.
n Identify the roles and responsibilities
of participants.
n Review and finalize specific locations for the
Study Area.
n Provide an opportunity for working group
members to give input on what compatibility
issues should be considered and/or assessed
during the CUS.

PWG/TWG Meeting #2
— September 2021
The key objectives of the second set of
meetings follow:
n Identify potential data gaps. Present the
compatibility issues identified to date, as well
as associated findings.
n Provide an opportunity for working group
members to review, revise, and approve the
list of compatibility issues that will be assessed
through the CUS. The working group
discussions resulted in the identification of
new compatibility issues, which helped ensure
the Study was as comprehensive as possible.

PWG/TWG Meeting #3 — March 2022
Before the third set of meetings, a preliminary list of strategies was submitted to working group members
to review as a starting point for developing and
refining strategies for the CUS. The key objective of
the third set of meetings follows:
n Garner input from the working groups on
potential strategies for mitigating or preventing
compatibility issues.

PWG/TWG Meeting #4 and Public
Meeting — October 2022
The key objective of the fourth set of meetings follows:
n Review the Draft CUS and recommendations
ahead of public review.

The public was invited to listen in on this fourth
working group meeting and was provided an
opportunity to comment and ask questions.

Following this meeting, the Public Draft CUS was
developed based on working group comments and
revisions and was released for public review and
comment. Public feedback was presented to the
working groups for guidance on appropriate revisions.

Presentation to City Council
— May 2023
The key objective of the fifth set of meetings follows:
n Review the draft Final CUS document and
approve it for finalization.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 49, Packet Page 241 2-10 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement

2.3. Public Engagement
Public Engagement Plan
The Public Engagement Plan, presented in Appendix
A, was developed at the outset of the Study to guide
stakeholder and public engagement efforts during the
Monterey Regional CUS. Public engagement — albeit
in modified formats due to the Covid pandemic — is
critical to developing an effective and mutually
beneficial CUS that addresses military and community
needs and interests.

This public participation strategy guided the
engagement process with stakeholders and the public
to provide them with project information and findings
and obtain meaningful input throughout the project,
thereby ensuring that CUS goals could be met. The
Public Engagement Plan defined public engagement
objectives, project stakeholders, working group
members, the Ambassador Program, methods of
engagement, and the stakeholder engagement
schedule. Much of the information in the public
engagement strategy is included in this CUS chapter.

Public Meetings
Three virtual public meetings were held during key
project milestones and were widely publicized using
the full array of communication methods. Elected
officials and public outreach offices from the
Monterey Regional CUS community partners, as well
as stakeholders from the PWG and TWG, were
enlisted to help advertise the public meetings and
promote the importance of participation through
email, social media sites, and other forums. This
approach capitalized on the CUS project contact list,
as well as project stakeholders’ existing contacts lists, to expand the reach of communication efforts.

Due to the pandemic and because the Study Area is
so large, the following public meetings were held
virtually to maximize attendance. Meetings were
tailored to specific geographic areas to better focus
the discussions on topics most relevant to residents in the respective areas area of focus.

Public Meeting #1: Project Initiation —
November 2021-Project Duration
The first engagement with the public for the Monterey
CUS was conducted as a virtual public open house
accessed through the project website. This virtual
open house established a baseline for project
transparency and accessibility and facilitated public
input. The online open house remained available on
the website for the duration of the project for
additional comments.

Due to the expanse of the Study Area and regional
diversity, Matrix developed four separate open
houses: North County (English and Spanish) and
South County (English and Spanish). The information
presented was tailored to each geographic area.

The virtual open houses incorporated three
important elements:

Sign-in Table: The table was set up as the initial
contact point to provide visitors guidance on the
virtual format, information on the project, and
forms to share background information about
themselves and give project feedback. Resources
included the following:
n Sign-in form
n Comment form
n Map for participants to identify where they live
n Help button
n Short video explaining how to navigate the
open house
n Factsheet #1: Project Overview
Community Questionnaire: The two
questionnaires for each of the two Study Area
locations were designed to access the community’s
perceptions of the military’s impact on the region.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 50, Packet Page 242 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-11 Stakeholder Engagement
The questionnaires are described in greater
detail below.

Informational Boards: The boards provided an
overview of the CUS process. Each board was
available for viewing online or downloading as a
PDF file. One board included an interactive map
feature that allowed participants to identify
location-specific military compatibility issues in
their community.

The results of the virtual open house are in
Appendix B.

Public Meeting #2: Interim Findings and
Preliminary Recommendations
— June 29, 2022
The second set of public meetings was conducted
following the completion of all data collection,
research, and compilation of responses to the
questionnaire. The meetings included information
on existing and projected conflicts between
installation operations and existing/future growth
in surrounding jurisdictions. The meetings
provided summary findings and an interactive
exercise that allowed participants to rank the
importance of the compatibility issues in terms of
recommended timeframes for addressing them.

All information gathered was incorporated into the
draft reports, as appropriate.

Public Meeting #3: Final
Recommendations — October 2022
The Public Draft CUS was developed based on CUS
working group comments and revisions to the
Working Group Draft CUS. The Public Draft CUS
was advertised and posted on the project website
for a 30-day public review and comment period.

The document was presented at the third public
meeting, where attendees were encouraged to
provide feedback during the meeting, through the
project website, or by contacting the CUS Project
Team directly.

Community Questionnaires
The online community questionnaire was designed
to capture the community’s perception of military
impacts on the community. Two questionnaires were
tailored for the North County and South County
Study Area locations, respectively.

The information obtained from the questionnaire
helped to gauge public knowledge and perceptions
regarding military operations and their effects on
residents. The information was used to help identify
compatibility issues and tailor the Monterey Regional
CUS process and strategies to improve awareness
where needed, reinforce communication, and
enhance coordination between the military
installations and the community. There were 21
questions, divided into the following categories.
n General demographics
n Communication between the military and
the community
n Perception of military installations in
the community
n Impacts related to the military installations and
neighboring communities
The questionnaire was made available on the project
website from December 2021 through the duration
of the project. In total, there were 11 responses to
the Monterey Bay questionnaire and 4 responses to
the Central Coast questionnaire. While the number
of responses is not indicative of the population in
the respective areas, the answers provide a small
insight into existing perspectives. The summary of
the questionnaire responses is in Appendix B.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 51, Packet Page 243 2-12 Final Administrative Draft Stakeholder Engagement
Project Website
www.MontereyRegionalCUS.com
The Monterey Regional CUS was promoted and
supported through a dedicated, branded project
website where interested parties could review and
download project information, public meeting
information and materials, and project
deliverables. The website utilized interactive
features that allowed community members to sign
up for email updates, provide input, and comment
on the CUS draft document.

The website also included an interactive map for
identifying location-specific issues and opportunities
related to military activities and compatibility
through “IDPlaces,” a dynamic interactive mapping
tool. Throughout the project, 24 comments were
provided through
IDPlaces, expressing
concern about
groundwater, traffic,
and threatened and
endangered species.

Getting the Word Out
The cornerstone of effective public outreach is
notifying community members about opportunities
to share their thoughts and learn more about the
project and identified issues. Notifications about
public meetings and the Public Draft CUS were
primarily given via eBlasts — in English and Spanish
— and social media.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/16/2023, Item No. 15., Item Page 52, Packet Page 244 Monterey Regional Compatible Use Study Final Administrative Draft 2-13 Stakeholder Engagement
Fact Sheets
Three informational brochures were developed and
distributed to the Monterey Regional CUS working
groups and to the public during the CUS process.

These informational brochures were made available via
email, on the project website, and at public meetings.

Fact Sheet 1: Project Overview
The first fact sheet describes the purpose, goals,
and objectives of the Monterey Regional CUS, as
well as methods of providing input on the process.

This fact sheet also summarizes the 26 standard
compatibility factors, or general types of
compatibility issues, that are most commonly
identified during compatibility studies. These factors
are the initial framework that provides stakeholders a
“starting point” and ultimately ensures a
comprehensive examination of all potential areas of
conflict. While some factors proved irrelevant to the
CUS, using this broad framework to help identify all
specific issues ensured that the CUS was sufficiently
comprehensive in its approach. The first fact sheet
was used to brief stakeholders participating in
interviews and during the first public meetings.