Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, June 20, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

This neighborhood has good access to Munras street but very narrow residential streets. Anything more than duplexes would lead to an excessive amount of cars parked on these narrow streets and make them very difficult to navigate safely
Increase the number of town homes and decrease the number of hotel locations Yes and no. parking remains an issue as well as the homeless population across the street live music more
Under utilized space appears to exist here. Easy access to traffic arterials.

This area is well situated for higher density residential with mixed retail/commercial uses. Housing located in this area will have much better walking/biking/transit access to nearby attractions, jobs, and services. Housing built in other areas such as Ryan Ranch will be auto-dependent, causing much more congestion per new housing unit built.

This area already pretty good for biking walking though some improvements would be needed if more housing added such as blocking some residential street crossings to discourage traffic from driving through. Dwelling should have few parking allotments per unit to encourage walking/biking/car sharing. Also need good parking enforcement. The city should advertise these neighborhoods as for local workers willing to walk/bike and therefore as challenging for parking accomodations.

Specifically related to the area on Perry Lane behind the car wash (there's an empty lot), this area has a lot of housing potential and should be recognized as such. Commercial zoning here seems a missed opportunity to solve some of the housing challenges.

Affordable family housing
If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

A COMBINATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH MAX. 20 PERCENT FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING. IT HAS A LOT OF POTENTIAL ALONG THE MUNRAS CORREDOR BETWEEN THE DEL MONTE SHOPPING CENTER AND EL DORADO.

Another great possibility to house people who work in the area - so many office personnel and hospitality workers could fill this location. Getting people to live near work will have a positive impact on the environment and by reducing pollution and traffic jams.
this neighborhood is very business like so i think families would need to be quiet also the pricing would be high.

Smaller housing for sinlge persons or people that work close by and travel staff.

This is another area with limited parking. Also, when you create more apartments and those types of housing, it limits larger families from moving in, and people with pets.

There are some prime redevelopment parcels with willing owners. Casa at is a bit off the Main Street and can handle more density.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 111, Packet Page 242 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-66 Community Survey Report
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Open space. Parks. Only prefer development in this area that does not require cars and additional roads. Only add development to encourage walking.

Many building on Cass (pill hill) are no longer used for medical services and could be converted to higher capacity housing. It would be nice to keep the charm of the smaller buildings and houses off El Dorodo so ADUs or small single family homes may work better there. It would be a shame to lose the charm of the individual houses with larger condo/apartments. Those structures would be better closer to Fremont and the hotels.

Renovating existing building could quadruple the housing available. Keeping homes under 3 stories makes the neighborhood more homey. More bedrooms on smaller lots vs big buildings would suit the sloping area and be more neighborly. Parking lots that pay for themselves and have long term parking permits would provide areas.

Many places have NO street parking. To do that, need a variety of ways to get around that are inexpensive and easy. The question of water seems more important than parking! We have alot of younger people moving into the peninsula, I would like to see more pet friendly apartments with plenty of parking space.

Munras could potentially benefit from a bus/taxi/rideshare transit only lane. I would like to see better biking infrastructure either along Pacific or Munras (or adjacent park).

Secured Parking
Portions of this area are already heavily impacted by traffic due of the Del Monte center and numerous motels.

Also many single family homes are rentals with lots of people in each house. Residential streets are narrow and parking on these streets is common due to lack of sufficient on-site parking. Don’t make this worse by increasing density further!!
I see this area as being a transition from downtown to outskirts. So envision a little more high-density buildings (apts/condos) nearer to downtown and the townhomes, duplexes, low-rise apts on the outskirts.

This area is so close to downtown that it is a real shame that it goes dark in the evening. There is real potential for a walkaable/ bikeable city at all hours of the day.

Currently too many single family homes that are medical offices or similar when there are office parks vacant on 68/ Garden Rd.

This is my neighborhood. I've long been worried about the Munras corridor as many of the motels have slipped into decay and are poorly taken care of...borderline blight on some in-particular (like at the corner of Alameda and Munras- pretty disgusting actually). I'd assumed that they would have been higher targets for redevelopment.

I think in general, all of the development in this area should be at a smaller scale than other more urban parts of the City because of the relationship between Peters Gate and the more heavily travelled corridors. I would encourage the redevelopment of both Munras and Cass if done thoughtfully and at an appropriate scale. I also wonder if at some point the shopping mall might be reimagined into a mixed use facility (think Santana Row in San Jose). There is tremendous potential to reimagine that site...with retail and parking already in place! Build housing on city parking lot on Pacific (upper level).

Safe dedicated walking paths to downtown. Dedicated community space for gathering and gated park for kids to safely play.

Growing a community here is where I would want to be, being able to walk to gorcery stores and a bustling downtown is the dream. Give rise to mid-rise condominiums and utilize all this space.

More Apartments and a parking structure.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 112, Packet Page 243 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-67
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Plenty of single family homes already, let's add all of the rest! It seems apartments is the more likely option here, which I think is great. Making sure some sort of easy to navigate bike path would definitely be helpful here, these roads can be tight and a bit scary.

Something I have forgot to mention for both Lighthouse and Downtown - PARKING NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE. The city makes WAY TOO MUCH money off of residents getting tickets while at work or at home, or the parking garages. Its just ridiculous and greedy.

Better ADA access and parking needed if more residents in this vicinity plus all the existing medical office uses in this area.

I believe there could be repurposing of office buildings to meet key affordable housing needs considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and shift to remote work /co-working spaces, taking the form of mid-rise apartments. Where there are single family homes, I'd like see numerous ADUs as well as redevelopment into fourplexes that could accommodate families and groups of young people/roommates. In this way, the infill/density of this area could be increased and this would even help tourism in the sense that visitors staying in the nearby hotels/motels would get to see and interact with the amazing residents of this city.

This area again calls for density. It is close to businesses, downtown and services which is great. It makes sense to create small, affordable apartments or fourplexes, but not single family homes. ADU's should be encouraged for homes that already exist in these neighborhoods. As always, parking will be challenging if several more persons are added to each street, so parking passes for lots should be encouraged. Perhaps adding city owned bike rental/bike share stations would be wise to incorporate.

Mid rise would keep a small downtown feel and allow for new store fronts on the ground floor.

There are many medical professionals in this area which are convenient to residence instead of driving all the way to Ryan Ranch. If houses or duplexes are built, do not create taller than two stories. Three stories look terrible, block the sun, and once allowed, will slowly push all buildings up, which would be a mistake. Also, properties that have houses with character would be demolished and there should be architectural guidelines for various designs but not out of character of our lovely city.

Cass could develop mid-high rise. A lot of unused square footage there.

This doesn't feel like an "area" but more of a corridor between other areas. More pedestrian-friendly access would help a great deal.
low level build limited to one to two story hight.

Del Monte center is close so shops and restaurants not needed in. This area… No new housing/development. There is not enough parking currently.

As stated in my response to building in the Downtown area, I believe that buildings should be consistent with other existing (as well as current code/area plans). We clearly should NOT build buildings that will damage the view of or light to other homes. Hence, in all areas except below Munras (Alvarado/Abrego) I would support a mixed-use 4 - 5 story building. In all other areas, my choice would be ‘plex’ units (2, 3 or 4) or 2 story buildings in accordance with other architecture in the area.

I like the idea of hopping on Pacific to Hwy 1. Yet parking on Cass street would be challenging. This is mostly businesses and does feel like a "residential" area.

A good area to develop low cost housing close to town. Don't lose the usually affordable hotels in that area - a Monterey secret option to the expensive ones around town.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 113, Packet Page 244 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-68 Community Survey Report
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Would think greater, high-end commercial development of the area south of El Dorado St would transform the area from a slightly grotty hodge-podge confusing to tourists, to something that will raise property tax value and other tax income.

The City should not develop single family home neighborhoods with high density projects. The only development that should be allowed in single family home neighborhoods is single family homes and ADUs. We do not need a townhome/condo complex on a street with single family homes. This kind of development just destroys the character and aesthetics of a neighborhood no matter what the developer or government says.

This area has high potential for its ease-of-access. This is a great opportunity for first-time home-buyers if condos, townhouses, and maybe small single-family homes (on small lots) are built there. This area feels quiet and neighborhood-y, but it is easily walkable to both downtown and the mall, and it is close to the highway (easy access via both Munras and Fremont). Transitioning the upgradable buildings from 1 story to 2 stories would make a huge housing impact with minimal aesthetic impact. This neighborhood is a great untapped resource, and I would love to purchase a property there if I could.

Majority 100% affordable for CURRENT RESIDENTS & WORKERS IN THE CITY ESPECIALLY LOW INCOME & lower middle income
Protected bike line on Cass and South Munras Ave would be a great connection to Del Monte Shopping Center from downtown. More mixed use buildings.

Parking on lots not street
Traffic is already too busy and blocked here. Bike lanes won’t solve the infrastructure challenges here.

Lower expenses by capping retirement benefits and address City spending with exorbitantly paid staff.

Is the fire dept being upgraded?
What about installing cameras for greater public safety. Way too many mentally ill and transients here and other parts of town too.

In addition to environment, proactively seek investors and new business’ for new opportunities/places to go by so many-students/military/tourists included.

Special Survey team to look into old trees and maybe trimming old trees to avoid falling trees on houses and roads. Cutting down week trees and replacing with new trees seedlings.

Could be a nicer area but not sure how well it'll bode with the school right there and new housing.. not many poor families could afford it
The mall could be so much more than it is, especially if we have better public transportation to more central downtown areas. Please preserve the neighborhood character of the Cass and Pacific areas.

Since this area is already dense, it won't hurt to add even more houses. On all thses areas, traffic is a major concern. Already we have congestion on weekends and holidays.

New residential buildings should be mixed-use with stores and restaurants incorporated into the design.

Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Plan for a community less reliant on vehicle transportation and conveyance.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 114, Packet Page 245 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-69
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” I advocate building multi storied buildings along Cass Street north of El Dorado Street to have a combination of first and second floor office space/ upper floor residential apartment space. Perhaps a 3 story height limit. Again, adequate parking must be provided for all uses, possibly below ground of below first floor. I think the unique character of upper Cass Street(with former single family homes of distinctive architecture serving as professional offices) should be preserved if possible.There seems to be a fair amount of land back from the street to allow for some well placed taller buildings and more density without impacting the view quality of the neighborhood.

MUST HAVE ENOUGH PARKING for tenants and customers
This is such a beautiful area of Monterey that I'm sure many residents would love to live in if housing was more accessible. Multi-family units would allow many people to live close to downtown while still enjoying a more residential setting.

Please build more housing! We are desperate for more housing! A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation and to commercial and public services
This could be a good area for added housing but please be cognizant of parking and traffic impacts to adjacent residences and buisnesses.

I'd like to see medical move back to this area and put housing out in Ryan Ranch. It is dangerous for older people to go all the way out to Ryan Ranch for medical services.

This is a pretty accessible are by car and a short distance to downtown. It would be good to keep the historical properties nicely separated and not squeezed between two apartment buildings (I forgot to mention this about the downtown area which is probably even a bigger concern)
needs better pedestrian infrastructure to get to the mall I think this area will need more sidewalks. Right now some areas are more walkable than others. New housing will create a need for parking strategies since the businesses that are already there are jockeying for parking now.

I want to see multi-family housing prioritized in this area. This is walking distance to downtown businesses and MIIS, so we have an opportunity to provide housing where people work and go to school.

This is also a potential area for live-work studio housing.

ADA sidewalks should be added to this area where they don't currently exist.

More very low income housing, especially rental.

Monterey has more than enough hotels, it would be great to rezone some of these as high-density housing.

This neighborhood currently would probably be somewhat boring to live in - it's clearly designed to be car-centric and is not great as a pedestrian. It would be a scary place to have a dog or cat get loose due to fast traffic and poor layout. Improvements of crosswalks, access, and general parking lot versus sidewalk layout could go a long way to making this a nicer neighborhood to live.

More housing. No more single family units. More safe bike access, both for traditional and e-assist bikes. Make it safe to bike and people will bike. Less cars on the road mean safer roads and less fossil fuels... it's not like Monterey get's buried in snow, it's the perfect place for bike life to flourish. And make it safe to bike out of town and to beaches north and south. If I had better/safer bike routes, I'd get rid of my car. I know I'm not the only one to sacrifice a bit of discomfort in the wet to help future generations flourish Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 115, Packet Page 246 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-70 Community Survey Report
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” water needed! May require widening of streets and one or two stoplights.

This seems to be an exclusive sort of area. Try to site new homes near public transit, the Del Monte shopping center, or nearer to downtown.

Ensure that parking is adequate for #1 for residents and #2 for visitors in this order.

This area has many properties with good-sized lots suitable for ADUs, which are increasing in demand both by occupants and owners
Can we convert one of the motels to senior housing using existing water credits? What is their current occupancy rate? Can we encourage some of the motels to add a second floor to build in density? Walkability, especially crossing major roads, continues t o be important, given that the Del Monte Shopping Center is a major attraction to residents. Can workforce or senior housing be added to the shopping center? The Cass Street area is a major medical hub busy with appointments. Construction of new housing in this area would cause major disruption for medical offices/facilities/delivery of health care. Cass Street also is very narrow; exits from medical building parking lot flow onto Cass, creating traffic challenges. This street is not suited for additional development. Any development of housing should maintain the character of current neighborhoods.

Four stories in this area.

My vision for this area would be to see more housing and move all the doctors offices to Ryan Ranch area. Also consider building a new hospital in Ryan Ranch or on Del Rey Oak/Fort Ord borderline. CHOMP would make a wonderful retirement village.

Main concern is to maintain the low-rise horizon of Monterey - no in fill buildings to be higher than 2 maybe three stories. Second concern is for new residential buildings to be compatible with the historical look and feel of downtown Monterey. Try to hold on to the current mix of shops, wine bars, restaurants and services - avoiding attracting any larger chain stores. Recognize the current ability of old Monterey to be both a working town for local residents and an attractive location for visitors that support the infrastructure - important to maintain the balance.

There's so many medical offices over here. How about rezoning these areas to multiple dwelling areas. It's also easier to get to the highway from this area and away from sea level rise This is a highly sought after area due to its proximity to downtown activities. This mixed use area seems to grow more and more into a business region instead of developing housing. Affordable homes with small lots and/or ADUs could benefit more of our senior population who would benefit from easy access to physicians, stores, and government buildings.

I'd like to see the single family homes being used as offices be turned back into homes and the large office buildings become apartments and condos. I feel that adding more housing to this area would benefit the businesses and restaurants downtown and help to keep the area lively and fun. As it stands, its sad seeing that area, which obviously was built as a residential neighborhood be returned to residents. With the closure of so many of the schools last year, offering more housing options for families who now are at Monte Vista, but cannot afford to live in that area would be beneficial as well, as many are commuting from other parts of town.

If a motel on Munras were to become available, a small number of townhomes could be built on the site.

Otherwise, ADUs seem the best option for this area.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 116, Packet Page 247 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-71
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” This has a good potential for housing. Lots of amenities are walkable here. need more housing that is away from coastline, but close enough to downtown Moderate housing development as it has good access to shops, transportation, leisure activities and coast. Major disadvantage is lack of parking.

Possibility of adding more housing at Del Monte Center as shopping malls are becoming less popular and more businesses may move out.

I like the idea of housing in this area because there are so many empty buildings that haven't rented in years.

Parking would need to be included so that the residents do not use all the available parking that is needed for businesses. I don't know if it is possible but as much green space as possible in this area so create areas with picnic tables and trees to enhance the beauty si it is not just buildings and cars.

We’ll need parking for residents and space for businesses on the first floor of the mid rise apartments and the townhomes. The city needs to work with the local business associations and come up with a streamline and business friendly process for new small businesses to open. The majority of small businesses in town feel that the city is not business friendly and make the process for opening businesses here in Monterey extremely difficult. We also need to make sure that the developments match the beauty of the area and don’t just choose the cheapest looking design. The aesthetics of the buildings need to match the area.

What are all the transients going to do when you develop this area? Live downtown? Oh wait, they already do.

This is a mixed use area now with single family to elder care housing & commercial, dominated by health care. As long a new housing is required to have off street parking I think new housing is appropriate.

As more medical offices go to Ryan Ranch and alternative locations, Cass will need to be reimagined. A mix of townhouses and more senior living in this area would be beneficial.

Improve the streetscape around Cass Street to allow for wider sidewalks, including street trees and an attractive neighborhood appearance. Allow redevelopment of commercial properties into housing.

Parking is an issue all over the peninsula. This must be kept into consideration.

Maintain the overall status quo, which makes this area (Monte Regio) such a desirable place to live, recreate, and an overall safe and quiet area to enjoy life. In light of the recent storms, allowing for removal of old and weakened Monterey pines near residences would provide an additional level of safety to residents.

Clean up trees - they overhang on sidewalks so pedestrians must walk on street to avoid getting hit in head by branches
Underutilized & 'hidden' gem areas - get creative & stop running the City like you're in 1980 This area is feels very residential in spite of the office buildings. This seems like a perfect area of town to focus on adding residential space &/or converting some professional buildings into residential.

The last thing Monterey needs are more office spaces considering how many seem vacant now and the fact that more and more professionals are working remotely.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 117, Packet Page 248 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-72 Community Survey Report
Pacific/Munras/Cass Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” I'm surprised that this area is under consideration. Much if not all of the currently open parcels are dedicated parkland and can't be developed. But what about the Old Capitol sight? That isn't in this district, but isn't it developable?
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 118, Packet Page 249 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-73

DEL MONTE AREA
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” There is potential for housing in these commercial areas. I do not recommend building on the dune in the northeast corner of this region, it is unstable sand and is not a wise choice with very little land to develop.

This area is already overcrowded with single family homes on small lots and with low rise apartments and condominiums. There may be the possibility of replacing some old and worn down single family homes with low rise apartments within the density limits that already exist.

I just want to have the ability to own property near where I work one day. I worked really hard as a Marine and in graduate school after that, and am now an extremely rare case having been hired back to be a Korean language assistant professor at DLI as a civilian after being a DLI student myself around 10 years ago. And yet I have no hope of ever owning property in the area with a pay of about $83,000 a year. DLI Faculty are highly skilled, highly educated, extremely hard working professionals who do critically important work for this country and yet we by and large have to rent simply due to the location of the Presidio. And property managers can gouge as much rent as they want because they can rely on the federal government to increase our locality pay just enough to keep pace. housing with plaza and ball fields and pickleball courts and bocce ball courts Del Monte Ave is a main commercial and traffic artery. Any new development should be carefully considered NOT to interfere with its traffic concerns!
Climate impact area. Need to harden the coastline to protect from sea level rise.

There seem to be a number of unhoused folks in this area any plans should address this.

I would like to see more high density housing in this area. The areas between Palo Verde Ave and Casa Verde Ave on both sides of Del Monte Ave provide a lot of opportunity for increased housing. They also have good access to the rec trail, which is a good selling point. My only concern would be how this might impact the flow of traffic through the area because Del Monte is a major thoroughfare.

IF environmental hazards aren't an issue -- and sea level rise/flooding may be more of a factor than this plan seems to believe it is -- I'd like to see higher-density housing, mostly rentals and some owner-occupied townhomes. This area has great access to the bike path and to transit; also ready access to Hwy. 1 for folks commuting longer distances.

Rental costs need to be controlled for people who are not wealthy. Instead of capping the total amount … cap rent based on the amount per square foot, something like $2-3/square foot of living space. A basic one bedroom - like 9 x 10 ft, full kitchen + a ¾ bath unit but with a full bedroom smaller, start docking the costs? The basic bathroom would be ¾ shower, toilet NOT in the shower, sink. Kitchen = full size oven/stove, full size fridge, sink. If the unit has 2 stove top burners instead of a full oven + stove or a tiny refrigerator, decrease the price based on the missing amenities.

Something like a dishwasher could be a luxury charge like $5 extra per month for basic kitchen. Granite counter tops? Bathtub? Small amounts like $5 per “luxury” item that make the unit more than just the basic one bedroom one bath.

Additionally, rent increases should be based on actual improvements in a property, not just because a landlord can increase rent. Landlord remodels a kitchen, cool then CA’s 10% increase can be applied to the property – but with a cap of so many years.

As someone who has lived in the same unit for 8 years, my landlady suddenly started increasing rent by the full California determined 10% - BUT this unit has NOT HAD ANY improvements. My income does not increase 10% a year so balancing the cost of living because of this is stressful. Not to mention frustrating because nothing has been improved.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 119, Packet Page 250 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-74 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Mix of housing while ensuring there are activities (like the parks there) are available and some local markets (like the deli shop) and other options for food (grocery stores, variety priced restaurants) and shops. I envision this being a great place for mid-priced town homes and codos in addition to apartments.

The existing scale of the area should be maintained nothing over 3 stories. Commercial should front on Del Monte.

I feel that this area should be used for businesses and not for residential An elevated footbridge at English Ave & Del Monte Ave, rising over Del Monte Ave to the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trail for safe pedestrian crossing. I would also like to see more free and subsidized housing and services for the unhoused population.

I live in this area currently in a somewhat affordable apartment complex but I earn over 100,000 (family of 3)….and the apartment is 2b/1b with no laundry. This is unacceptable. Although there already are many apartment complexes, we need even more and better built and kept. Rent seems to stay pretty stable which is a relief for lower earning families. It is impossible to find a 3 bedroom that is truly affordable. This area already looks more working class and we need to expand on that. More green areas/parks would be nice but thankfully we already have some nice areas. The problem is that apartments have incredibly thin walls which affects quality of life. Maybe single family townhomes that are medium sized and affordable would be a nice addition. The small backyard homes/tiny homes would be a great option for smaller families! Add communal spaces to socialize, curb appeal and trees. Make the area prettier than current. Add businesses on ground floor if mixed use to draw in businesses.

I think that the south side of the street could sustain some more commercial development to support the surrounding industrial and residential base. But i would not want any more development around the coastal trail.

Again, with higher water tides coming it would be a poor choice to build housing here. Farther away from the bay and lake maybe. We might think thought of building a pedestrian bridge paralleling Del Monte Avenue for families, bikers and walkers. With higher tides along the bay that may be another way for folks to travel down this roadway.

Here, a pedestrian overpass could help people access the beach safely. More trees would be welcome. Could the city somehow incentivize business owners to plant trees on their lots? Perhaps by tearing out a 5 X 5 foot chunk of concrete on the lot, if requested to do so by the lot owner, and by also giving some sort of monetary incentive? Housing would be too close to the bay and lake elestero where we know waters will rise. would not be worth the investment to build here. But there might be a pedestrian and bike bridge built that would serve bikes and walkers along this busy corridor. Great for families with kids on bikes and more useful when the water level rises.

Considering this gateway to town has high potential it should be maximized.

I would be concerned about making this too high density as it is a crossroads for people moving around the peninsula.

I'd love to see new affordable housing in this area but a strategic plan to manage parking in the neighborhood. A beautiful scenic tree lined streets and gardens would be lovely! First of all I disagree with the way this map is drawn. The entire area from the highway to Del Monte should be included; as the HWY 1 is a physical and social natural division. This area has so much potential that has been squandered by the City and property owners. The location of the Del Monte School, now the Bay View Charter School brings a lot of traffic into this area from all over the County. If it was a neighborhood school, this would not be the case. Kids could walk. Very few kids walk to this school. I think the school property would be perfect for a nice condo/town home development. MPUSD should sell this. Such a perfect location and access to shopping, Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 120, Packet Page 251 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-75
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” public transport, bike route on the rec trail etc. Also the warehouses along DeLa Vina are perfect locations for housing development. There is a nice park ( Ferrante) behind the NPS that gets very little use. The current situation of mixed commercial and housing is not well supported and is very frustrating for residents. Trucking and commercial vehicles and housing do not mix well. There needs to be a transition zone, which there is not. I live in this area and the weather and the sun , along with recreation opportunities are phenomenal. But this area is not well designed for mixed use. I doubt there was any significant city planning going on when this area evolved into a mixed use area. I think this area would be a very desirable area for more high density housing. But this needs to be well planned, and not random crappy projects like the one that was proposed for Encina. Let's get the small time uninspired developers out of the equation and do some quality planning in this area? PLEASE! I could see this area providing a lot of deferent residential development, with maybe a shopping center as a focal point. There could potentially a large increase in pedestrian traffic, so I could see improved crosswalks, and/or development to protect pedestrians.

I said yes to this neighborhood but it really should be a no. This neighborhood is already densely built out and is heavily impacted by traffic and parking. It's hard to imagine anyone living in this neighborhood thinking that more growth is good when there are so many other neighborhoods that are less crowded along with the potential growth along the Ryan Ranch, Fort Ord and Garden Road areas. However, the areas shown in black along Del Monte might be ok for limited apartment growth. But keep it simple and don't add a lot to the density.

It's not fair to throw a lot of new growth into already crowded neighborhoods when there is so much space available elsewhere. In fact, many, many, many Monterey neighborhoods that could absorb more growth with minimal impact are not even listed in this survey!!!!!! That's very disappointing. And completely unfair. Why is that so???
Heavy traffic area. Something that will mitigate the noise and congestion.

I see 3 story apartment buildings with green areas between buildings as being an attractive idea. Other dwellings would make this a large, varied community in which to live.

Since Del Monte Ave. is a major arterial, the thought of adding more housing away from the street would be necessary.

Perhaps community plazas, small, would be a nice addition. Since Del Monte is seen as a "drive through" street, offering smaller shps and restaurants could transform the entire area.

Build high-density housing of all types. Apartment buildings, multiplexes, etc. Clean up the run-down neighborhoods to make them more inviting for families.

Yes, please offer more housing for military personnel that work at NPS/DLI, so they are not taking housing from locals. The military have plenty of space to make high rise apts on federal land and that's what should be pursued.

Open all NPS gates at all times and lengthen the turn lane.

Crossing del monte is a nightmare as a pedestrian. Build a pedestrian bridge or two!! This would greatly improve coastal trail accessiblity.
given the risks associated with sea level rise on the access road to this area, I would avoid further development.

We should be able to provide housing for the area
I want the folks who work in the area to be able to live in the area.

Area is being taken over by traffic and homeless. Need to strengthen walkable paths, green space, and safe biking CLEAN-UP and enforce the appearances of properties and the traffic. Regulate signage and eliminate shoddy NEON!
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 121, Packet Page 252 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-76 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Too much traffic already. No place to park. Keep shoreline free from building.

Roads are already congested in this area! Too much traffic! There seems to be great potential for housing development. Parking could be a problem. Also substantial frequent reliable transportation is necessary though workers could use the rec trail to bike to work.

The run-down areas on the NON OCEAN side of Del Monte would benefit from medium rise developments. And this would provide more housing. But the OCEAN side of Del Monte should be TOTALLY opened up. They one time called it "window on the bay".

Obviously, kick out the businesses that don't contribute to ambiance. No cars, no tattoos, no schlock. Keep up the park area you've done a fabulous job with, now add outdoor miniature golf, cafes, small outdoor restaurants, charm! Let us enjoy another area looking at the ocean, sipping a tea or brew in a thatched hut or whatever. Come on, use your imagination, not some dictated decree that dates and deteriorates the area. You are too good to do that!
Opportunities for dog parks.

This area can only be improved with a little thoughtful development and design. Given its proximity to the beach, it could be very desirable location. Currently it’s not much to look at and could transform into a smart district, with fewer restrictions than faced by other districts in town that are scenic or historic This area is practically on the beach. First, it should be cleaned up and the homeless people need to be removed from this area. Get rid of the tents and garbage that people simply set up without any repercussions. Start by cleaning up what is there!
I support high-density housing here, but only if climate change doesn't turn this little piece into ocean. We definitely need to get rid of the "industrial light" auto shops that are complete eyesores in front of the Bay. I don't think that single-family homes should line this area of Monterey. I also don't agree with mid-rise homes that will further block bay views.

There may need to be a few more shops integrated into this area as housing is developed in it.

Is there ADU possibilities in this area? I am not as familiar with it, but know there are some single family homes.

This could an interesting hip industrial/living space.

Improve all aspects of Active Transportation infrastructure, creating more protected and connected bike lane networks. Remove parking requirements.

Adding housing here with a mix of local business's would be good but make the housing affordable don’t gentrify this neighborhood please
Mostly commercial, but needs housing
I'd like to see Monterey incorporate live-work spaces, similar to what Seaside is doing over in the west end area, down Contra Costa and Ortiz. Rental of business space in addition to rental of living space is out of reach for many small businesses, making Monterey unfriendly to those who wish to start, which many people have to have a second income now as rental and home prices have skyrocketed in the last few years.

This area needs some neighborhood stores/parks, and increased safe/pleasant walking and biking , and not just on the bike path.

I think you should encourage businesses to spruce up the facades of their buildings. Maybe they could all have a Spanish style look to them like businesses in Santa Barbara.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 122, Packet Page 253 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-77
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Please increase housing density by building mixed-use properties which have commercial units on the street level and residential units above. DO NOT BUILD ON SAND DUNES where the recreation trail goes over the dunes.

The dunes will shift back with sea level rise and it would not be prudent to build there.

Housing should be East of Park Avenue to stay out of the tsunami zone. Good location in the industrial area, but we will lose a lot of light industrial jobs, those jobs allow employees to afford housing, weigh numbers in decisions.

It would be great if there were some small restaurant, and coffee shops along the bike path here (like Dust Bowl, but more rustic, less commercial_). This is a beautiful area that feels abandoned when walking or riding bikes.

Smaller housing structures here would be a great help to the area, giving it more life and making locals feel safer.

I would like to see the trail rerouted to include the stop light (safety issue). This has been addressed without implementation. Parking and traffic are issues that need to be addressed.

Del Monte Ave is very congested now. I cannot imagine if higher density dwellings were created. Parking is an issue.

The type of housing that would be appropriate depends on what solutions are found to the already intolerable traffic passing through here every afternoon. More cars cannot be added to this artery.

Different sections of this area would likely be appropriate for different kinds of housing. Question 2 is too general for me to answer.

Traffic aside, this seems like a good place for housing. My only concern would be removing more businesses that do serve residents.

The Del Monte Corridor seems particularly well suited to replace "light industrial" uses with substantial residential stock.

I'm surprised that there aren't environmental hazards in this area, given its elevation. The location vis-a-vis recreation is good, but it could benefit from more pedestrian-friendly ways to access both the North Fremont and Downtown areas.

This is the gateway to Monterey. I'd like to see a few more tourist friendly business more like Dustbowl than the ugly rotor rooter and auto shop buildings in this area. Maybe combined with a small number of townhomes or two story apartments/condos.

In the face of climate change, I ABSOLUTELY believe the city must adhere to planning (homes and businesses) based on the sea level rise map/study/report the city paid to have done 1-2 yrs ago and COMPLETELY AVOID any future development (housing and/or commercial/business) in high liquefaction, tsunami and 5-10-20 year flood zones (in other areas of the city high fire hazard must be given equal consideration). As it is, the city is going to take budget hits in the not too distant future because we will have to pay to buy property from current landowners as sea level rises to cover their loss--as well as LOSE the property taxes of those homes/businesses.

Prudent planning to accommodate these facts are essential.

That being said as a general statement across the board, I do not support homes being built on the ocean side of Del Monte Ave (where Natale's Auto and open space east along the coastal trail near the Seaside border -- both listed as top tier choices). I do support single family homes in the DMBN on the currently open lots that have been awaiting water. Other than that, DMBN has a dense mix of a wide variety of single family homes (old and new), ADUs, multiple family homes, condominiums and apartments.

South of Del Monte I support mixed use -- apartments on top of current businesses and/or transforming vacant/abandoned structures into mixed use buildings and/or low-to-mid-rise apartments.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 123, Packet Page 254 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-78 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” SUGGESTION: Other states I have lived in had a common, mandatory practice whereby the DEVELOPER MUST plan and pay for infrastructure (roads, bridges, sidewalks, etc) to accommodate vehicle/foot/other traffic increase and needs a result of the project/development.

This may be a good area for more housing since it is already zoned commercial and multi-family. Please do not allow multi-family units in R-1 areas !!
Utilize inactive areas for combination business/residential Keep multi-family out of r-1 zoning.

We need to have space for multipurpose construction that allows businesses to exist I would love to see more spaces for graduate students to be able to rent apartments or mother in law attachments that are nearby campus (which is in downtown monterey) and reasonable priced.

This would be my preferred location to live. However, keeping rent costs affordable would be the main concern.

There seems to be parking available, but I would hope for designated tenant parking options so as not to compete with locals and visitors going to the beach.

Many parcels could be more efficiently utilized. However this is the only area within Monterey zoned for the heaviest commercial/industrial use -- I think that use should be preserved.

I would love to have a big bookstore here, ideally next to a cat cafe'! Also -- more businesses that are open 24 hours or at least until midnight. It always feels like they "roll up the sidewalks" around here about 8 p.m., when I get off of work. A community garden could be a nice touch, as well. Finally -- these ADUs are terrible for renters -- please do not allow them, as much as possible!
Mixed use! More culture, less decay! More young people! SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT THE TRAFFIC.

No building in any Hazard zone
On the west/north side of the neighborhood you have easy access to the ocean, this will be an attractive place to live. Easy to get to NPS, MPC, and downtown Monterey using trails.

This is a great area for transit oriented development. Traffic volume is so low at most times on Del Monte that it doesn't need two full lanes. It only gets backed up during peak commuting hours, but if you guys made one lane a dedicated bus lane then you could move a lot more people a lot more efficiently through this corridor. Then it would be easier to follow a Transit Oriented Development approach and build density near the stations for the BRT/dedicated bus line. If the line follows Del Monte all the way from Marina along the following route Del Monte > Hwy 1 > 2nd Ave >light fighter > jim moore > Monterey Rd > Del Monte > Transit Plaza > Light House > PG downtown with a dedicates bus lane you could move a huge amount of commuters on that line and justify building parking-lite new developments near stops on that route. For now dedicated the lane for whichever JAZZ line follows Del Monte would help a ton.

This area feels more commercial. Also, it's one of the main roads in/out of downtown Monterey and the peninsula.

Any new project should consider traffic impact.

Limited low rise apartments in some areas as long as parking is addressed. I do not support trying to add over 3,000 houses in Monterey!
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 124, Packet Page 255 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-79
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” This corridor sits with a lake at two ends. Each will influence the road and areas along Del Monte if there is sea water rise. The city will have to monitor but have plans roughly made to deal with any results. Most of the side areas are commercial and light industrial. These areas are not high focus but still important to any city.

The residential areas may accommodate some ADUs but they are smaller lots.

The city could look for grants to link traffic signals through Seaside to accommodate flow improvement.

Support housing on streets/neighborhood on underutilized lots off of Del Monte. Appreciate the open space and trees next to trail
I believe we need to keep this area free of growth. Any growth will block views to the ocean and Del Monte already backs up for an hour during rush hour. Why would you want to put more cars coming and going from there? The business area of Del Monte is a harsh change from the neighborhoods. Create walking cross paths, greenspace along the sidewalks, mini-plazas for stopping along the way. Design added housing so that it feels good to walk from one area to the next, from business to residential to schools to houses, thru mini parks etc along the way Prior to building housing along this corridor, the City should look for ways to make Del Monte Boulevard safer for pedestrians and cyclists. The proximity of this area to the beach and coastal trail make it well suited for future housing development.

New housing should also include plans for Level 2 electric vehicle charging stations . potential for increased density and rental units. we have lots of property to purchase but less rental. need lowmoderate income rentals. nature of road make everything here very difficult to access.

This area seems like one of the last available places for service industries to locate in the city.

If this type of housing is approved and constructed along Del Monte, additional transit investments make sense.

Bus rapid transit in this corridor could help alleviate traffic congestion.

If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

My vision starts with the only natural way to deal with climate change is by growing trees, which over the years will store CO2. With that being said, I have a little nursery of trees, which was started back in 2014 with my first tree. With a palm tree seed, that was gathered from a palm tree on Palm avenue, seaside. What am I trying to say, it would be nice to live in a house with a front and back yard that will support a crop of trees. If you know of a place where I could donate trees, to be planted in terra firma. I have approximately 30 trees growing in a small space, 4 feet by 8 feet? Only the serious may reply back? Easy access to the highway and Rec Trail, easy place to put some taller 4 story complexes, many have parking built in already, seems a no brainer kind of location. Adding some green space areas with housing would be a nice addition to an industrial area.

This neighborhood is beautiful and families would benefit from being close to nature, more apartment complexes to put more housing.

This area has more space and parking may be difficult when there are events at the fairgrounds. However, there will be more space for larger families and those with pets. Also, it is important to build housing that people can own, not just properties that are rented out.

This is an area that can handle intensive density by building vertical.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 125, Packet Page 256 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-80 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Surround del Monte with more green space open space Parks pedestrian routes and bicycle access This area needs some services for housing to be more appealing. A small grocery store and a couple cafes would provide more community spaces and walkability. There is potential for mixed use if some of the commercial spaces can be converted to include housing on top. Parking is difficult here.

This lovely residential area needs help improving the older homes on large parcels into multi-family units.

Sidewalks should be larger and more walkable. It would be wonderful if parking could be inside a square shaped unit of 4-6 homes and not on the street. A mix of styles would add interest to this very fine area.

In the Villa Del Monte neighborhood and along Del Monte, there are many abandoned structures (across Casa Verde from BayView Academy are couple lots with thrashed buildings; a ‘church’, couple garage types). They are eyesores. Dilapidated structures full of weeds. The city should by these properties and build duplexes or whatever sq footage would allow WITH garages to keep vehicles off the streets.

There are industrial buildings behind the Fish House that could be rezoned to create housing/townhomes. Create an area outside of residential areas for these mechanic, auto body type businesses. This has already been done to create Windows on the Bay when commercial buildings were removed as their leases expired. That was 20 years ago + -
Also in VDM neighborhood behind Fish House are several houses that have been used for businesses (Millers Cleaning for one). Take the houses back. Rezone area to bring back families and have businesses move to other designated areas. Offer businesses incentives to relocate. Make it attractive for them to vacate. Offer to buy vacant lots.

Possible relocation for commercial enterprises where Talbott Ties used to be. Or by Ryan Ranch where some city departments are now.

With this emergency housing need (3,600) seems like the city could by the land sort of like eminent domain situations
With some creative architecture there is the possibility of many new houses, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes by restoring this area to residential instead of the lame idea of business taking such prime real estate. Right by rec trail, elementary school, restaurants, gymnastics, urgent care and the ever busy Starbucks!! Create, incentivize, build.

Would love to walk the area with anyone from city who is not familiar with Villa Del Monte neighborhood.

[email protected]
Secured Parking
Low rise commercial over residential.

Safe walking paths especially along the busy roads. Dedicated gated community space for children and pets to play.

More Housing and Condos. More parking options.

This area is great for apartments and townhomes, but I am a bit worried near Ramona. There is a lot of crime in that area, so I would rather it be a bit safer before building more housing there. Being close to the bike path is awesome too!
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 126, Packet Page 257 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-81
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” PARKING NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE. The city makes WAY TOO MUCH money off of residents getting tickets while at work or at home, or the parking garages. Its just ridiculous and greedy.

This area is mostly warehouses and industrial buildings. A few years ago the city wanted to make it the ghetto to house all homeless shelters in one "under utilized" area so no one else would be bothered in their backyards. This area can house some apartments or townhouses, but will still be mainly industrial sandwiched between Freeway and Del Monte Blvd.

In addition to the current mix of commercial and industrial uses, I think it would be useful to add affordable housing for the workers that are employed in this area. I would want to retain the benefits of the auto & industrial businesses while also taking advantage of the great potential nearby (within walking distance) for families and people of all ages to enjoy the parks and beaches. Perhaps the affordable apartments could also be mixed use if it is a redeveloped office building (having a business on the ground floor and a few housing units above).

Being right on the main thoroughfare is positive in that it is centrally located but poor for parking unless it is built into the structure, such as an underground or basement level of an apartment building.

Tier 2 or 3 would be fine, but this area is already very dense.

A lot of tear down and potential in this area.

This is an ideal area to build high-density housing. It would be very helpful if there were pedestrian bridges over Del Monte which is basically an urban freeway and not conducive to safe access by families and the less-abled.

This area is well utilized now with necessary commercial business. Gas stations, auto repair shops, ware houses, and etc…..

Again, I believe we should be consistent with the current architecture of the neighborhoods. Parking must be adequate as there is no parking on DelMonte.

This area is already used by local businesses and does not need to be taken over with developments.

This is an interesting idea. I could see how this area might be appealing in terms of space, yet who would want to live in an area surrounded by highway? Also, Del Monte is turning into it's own problem with traffic, so merging on and off would be a project in itself.

Keep it the same
Do not mix high density housing with single family home neighborhoods. This kind of development degrades the character and aesthetics of a single family home neighborhood. Dense housing projects should only be developed on major corridors/streets.

This is another location with high potential. It has quick access (by car and/or foot) to downtown Monterey and to the Broadway district of Seaside. It also has easy highway access. The one detractor may be noise pollution due to proximity to major roads (Del Monte and Highway 1), but I would still consider purchasing a property in this neighborhood if I had the opportunity. This feels like a location well-suited to multi-family units (condos, townhomes, et cetera).

Same as previous answers
Much of the area is not great for housing, would need some beautification and careful planning.

Address all the road closures and power outages here. Update old & outdated infrastructure.

Homeless and camping needs stronger ordinances so plopped don’t litter and leave hazardous waste all over Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 127, Packet Page 258 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-82 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Monterey. Windows by the Bay & DT has real safety and security challenges. Need more foot and bike patrol and officers need to remember they serve all in Monterey—not just the unhoused.

The City can purchase traffic lights with cameras as many accidents here. Also need to update infrastructure of power, water, sewar pipes as places smell at times.

There should be no new development on the north side of Del Monte Avenue as that is a very narrow area and no room for housing without destroying the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trai, which is used by hundreds of people every day both for recreational purposes and for commuting to work and school.

You can't take out those trees. And by creating new housing here, you really kick the poor people out of Monterey.

Unacceptable
Empty businesses at del monte shopping center could be converted to apartment/condos, for employees, since water and parking is available.

As with all of these areas, major artery traffic is an important issue. Some of these streets are very small. Existing neighborhoods shouldn’t be disrupted.

In so many of the eight areas, major traffic arteries are already severely overtaxed. How are we going to add 3K units when we can’t handle the local and commuter traffic we already have? We need greatly enhanced public transportation, including but not limited to frequent, reliable, affordable buses.

ONSITE PARKING FOR 2 CARS PER UNIT NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED ON ANY HOUSING PROJECT! BIGGEST ISSUE IN THIS AREA IS HORRIBLY INADEQUATE ONSITE PARKING FOR RESIDENTS.

This area of Del Monte will be a disaster zone within the next 20 years due to Sea Level Rise. No one should be sleeping in the area. It should only accommodate day time businesses with a chance to run from a Tsunami or storm flooding warning. The water will come in from the bay on both sides from El Estero and Roberts Lake areas. Sand dunes are very temporary with violent storms or Tsunamis. Look at the damage that happened this winter along Pacific Grove's coast.

Many of the homes in this area seem to be smaller one story residences. The area between of Casa Verde and Ramona supports several larger apartment buildings which seem to fit nicely into the neighborhood infrastructure. I support creating more of these types of apartment buildings. Adequate parking is of course a requirement.

Perhaps zoning to allow neighborhood convenience businesses (coffee shops, delis, restaurants) to encourage local foot traffic.

New residential buildings should be mixed-use with stores and restaurants incorporated into the design.

Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Ensure there is adequate alternative transportation options for residents to reduce the need for personal vehicle conveyance.

Parking is a major issue and the multi use shops with housing above would have to be designed to keep the feel of area and schools/business.

Please build more housing! We desperately need more housing of all types and as quickly as possible! Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 128, Packet Page 259 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-83
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation and to commercial and public services while protecting the neighborhood's aesthetic and historical resources.

This could be a good area for added housing provided that parking and traffic impacts are mitigated.

It would be nice to have high density housing in the area along Del Monte and between Delmonte and Hwy one.

There are already many resources for this area (restaurants, grocery, home improvement stores, coffee shops, public transportation). The only drawback that I can see is too many cars trying to access Del Monte in an area that already is backed up with cars coming off of Hwy 1. no viable areas
Fix the tot lot flooring. It's hazardous. Safety of children and families is of concern.

No more housing.

Better crossway on the corner of the path and casa verde / del monte. It's dangerous and not safe.

I have reservations about the areas on the ocean side of Del Monte due to concerns about climate change fueled rising ocean. This area needs more nearby amenities for the new residents as well as sidewalks.

There's not much in the way of "neighborhood character" to preserve along Del Monte, so it's the perfect place for new higher density housing. High density housing also helps off-set the cost of sound-proof windows and thicker walls to protect residents from traffic noise. This would provide walkable housing for NSP students and staff! To meet the needs of service members who range from young single adults to families with multiple children, providing a mix of studio to 3-bedroom units in new apartment buildings is recommended.

Secure bicycle parking should be required for all new housing developments along the recreation path. New ebikes can weigh over 70 pounds, so carrying them up stairs and through hallways is not ideal. It's not uncommon to see secure bicycle lockers or locked bicycle parking cages for apartment buildings in cities like Portland and Seatle.

More very low income housing is necessary. Built it everywhere. More apartments to rent.

I live near here and it's a shame that many of the apartments available in this neighborhood are vacant 80% of the year. If high-density housing is added here, controls should be considered to make sure that the units don't fill up with time shares. Check out the time shares in Moss Landing to see how developers are currently getting around laws which prohibit time shares.

I don't think that the little triangle which is currently a portion of the bike path would be worth developing, it would be better to maintain as public park. The rest of these areas would be great for some more housing.

This area needs a grocery and pharmacy. Nothing nearby making a car necessary. The parking on Surf Way can be very crowded on weekends, so parking permits or a separate parking area could be helpful.

This are has no real groceries or pharmacies, making it necessary to have a car to meet daily needs.

Keep Tier 1 area's as they are. Add additional lighting/markers for crossway at the beginning of Del Monte Beach.

Enforce parking restrictions for beach parking, limit parking to beach area not side streets.

In my view, this area should have a mix of housing and shops, with a plaza for socializing. Having access to parking within the housing complexes would help solve the problem of limited access to street parking. City Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 129, Packet Page 260 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-84 Community Survey Report
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” planning should encourage walking, i.e. with walking sidewalks and crosswalks. Green areas are a must, i.es. street trees added wherever possible.
more housing! no more single family homes. more safe bike access, including for e-bikes!!!! a biker should be able to get around Monterey AND out to other areas of interest, Big Sur beaches and hiking trails etc, up to Santa Cruz.... e-bikes can replace cars in regions without extreme weather. That would be Monterey! A few more food/grocery options in this area might help. Since there's a school near there, protected bike lanes would always help.

Maintain View to the Bay and sight lines to ocean.

This neighborhood has the opportunity to be transformed by added housing. Walkable access to the beach and the rec trail are wonderful. Shopping is down the street a bit. Traffic here is fast and Del Monte Ave is wide and would be scary to cross as a pedestrian. Maybe a bridge could be built over it? Affordable workforce and senior housing are high priority.

Four stories in this area.

Del Monte needs more small businesses.

This corridor is prime for development; it's an industrial wasteland.

Too close to the bay and sea level rise
This area could be developed into a more substantial neighborhood with existing open land to help the regions citizens gain access to a variety of housing and small shops such as mini-marts that support healthy and fresh foods such as fruits and vegetables.

There will need to be a lot more crosswalks across Del Monte, and they will need to be at lights. preserve the shoreline especially in these areas that are so close to the water. a greenspace buffer is fine, but with careful consideration for pollution that may occur tourism along the shore. no additional housing in this area Would not support any new dwellings on the bay side of Del Monte Ave/the Rec Trail- that is a stretch of superintense traffic and impatient drivers, and crossing Del Monte is only for the young, strong and fleet (no joke)... new residential buildings on the south side, between Del Monte and Fremont, seems like a better bet. Too bad the existing public area - the sandwich shop on Casa Verde probably cannot be expanded/enhanced, for it is a great location and the food being sold is good- that place is not only worth saving but could be a sort of anchor in a nice little hang-out space for residents. Good luck! And- do not forget to include affordable housing! This area is far enough from downtown and lighthouse to allow housing development without degrading the character of those areas. It also has room to accommodate increased traffic as long as parking is planned.

We’ll need parking for residents and space for businesses on the first floor. The city needs to work with the local business associations and come up with a streamline and business friendly process for new small businesses to open. The majority of small businesses in town feel that the city is not business friendly and make the process for opening businesses here in Monterey extremely difficult. We also need to make sure that the developments match the beauty of the area and don’t just choose the cheapest looking design. The aesthetics of the buildings need to match the area.

Increased density, increased access to commercial areas along the Del Monte corridor, increased walkability Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 130, Packet Page 261 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-85
Del Monte Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” This Del Monte is densly populated. It was cut off from Monterey by Highway One years ago. The area, when Fort Ord was open, was an area that the City seemed to forget and allow activities like adult clubs and bars (kind of a dumping ground). The Monterey Fairgrounds was a draw to fill the hotels along this section of Fremont.

Monterey needs to rethink the Fairgrounds property and include it in the overall development mix for housing in Monterey. The area has great potential to provide housing for the City. The housing should be high density multifamily home ownership. The units should be include a blend of one and two bedroom homes, priced affordable.

The housing needs to simultaneously supported with conveniences and the convenances do not need to be located facing Fremont. The conveniences should be located in small onclaves and sized so they are not too big and can depend on Fremont vehicle traffic numbers for their business plan estimates.

Another traffic/parking issue. Will have to have safe ways to entering and exiting Del Monte during rush hour when it is already jam packed
I would like to see NO more building on the dunes. We will need to keep every existing business that it is possible to preserve. More attention to traffic congestion on Del Monte will be necessary.

The Del Monte corridor should not add more housing and traffic. It is already maxed out traffic-wise.

This area is already impacted with apartments and parking is scarce.

High traffic area - keep it clean & focus energy on traffic flow + parking; improve pedestrian access north to south Whatever is built here, it should be considered that Del Monte is a popular corridor that visitors take when driving into our city. Buildings should evoke the charm, warmth and rich history that is our city. Currently, it feels rundown and not all that well maintained.

I think the area north of Del Monte (where the auto repair shop is and the warehouses) could make a much more inviting entrance to our City. There are also opportunities in the blocks to the south of Del Monte. It would be good to have a grocery store in the area too since there are none near the area.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 131, Packet Page 262 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-86 Community Survey Report

NORTH FREMONT AREA
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” The larger sites could have businesses and parking for those businesses on the ground floor with underground parking for the apartments above. The area needs more trees and landscaping to make the area feel more prosperous.

There are already a lot of apartments near North Fremont (such as near De La Vina). Building more mixed use housing with shops on the first floor may provide a more active vibe to the area (with less of a strip mall feel).

There is not a lot of green space so adding small pocket parks with high density housing would be beneficial.

Making sure there are bike lanes and sidewalks to connect this region to the bike path and downtown is important part of the planning to make alternative transit options viable.

Mixed use buildings with mid rise at the maximum height, the streets cape is wide enough to accommodate all housings options except SFR. Existing SFR can accommodate ADU's, Make greater bike lane connections to the protected bike path.

I've been going to work near the airport for more than 20 years and have watched the slow decay of the North Freemont corridor. I realize the area has a variety of problems that are hard to fix. North Freemont will probably always be a thoroughfare for car traffic since it's such a direct link between Rt. 1, Monterey, Seaside, and Del Rey Oaks. Banning left turns, as is done on Lighthouse, would be difficult so you can't completely remove the median.

However, North Freemont could be nicer by restricting the car traffic to the middle of the Avenue as much as possible and adding mixed-use mid-rise structures on either side of Freemont. Is there room to set new development back a bit from the traffic? Could a parking structure be built at the intersection of Airport and Freemont (where Eddy's used to be) to accommodate fairgrounds parking? Can the existing bike path in the center median of Freemont should be removed to allow more room for wider sidewalks, medians, trees, and parking on either side of Freemont? I realize a lot of money was spent on the path but very few people use it. I sometimes walk to work along Freemont but do not use the path because I don't want to wait at the light twice just to access and depart it. The sidewalk is also much more convenient for accessing businesses that are mid-block, such as walking to lunch at Mundo's. Many bicyclists feel the same because I encounter more of them sidewalk than I see on the path. Since you have multiple property owners along the route a full-scale redo of North Freemont is probably not coming soon. But, can the city change the zoning rules to force people to build? It saddens me to see North Freemont become so neglected. Why do I see abandoned buildings and vacant lots full of weeds when many of my colleagues are struggling or leaving town due to high rents and low vacancy rates? It doesn't have to be like this.

Who’s idea was that bike path in the middle of North Fremont? Not a smart idea for several reasons-please contact me if you’d like more input (413-230-9588). Were any bikers consulted beforehand about the bike path on N Fremont because none of us use it. Thanks
North Fremont is one of the main traffic arteries of Monterey (Business US 1), and developments overflow from the Villa Del Monte and Del Monte Grove Laguna Grande areas of Monterey. Any new development must be designed not to interfere with its transportation needs.

Need new strategies to manage parking here.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 132, Packet Page 263 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-87
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Mixed use would be good for this area
This stretch is underutilized. A mixed use of housing, shops, and outdoor space. Maybe also some improvements to Fremont street itself like trees.

This area would be a good place for housing, I think it would need to be more walkable and a strategy for increased traffic on Fremont would have to be carefully considered.

Fremont St is mainly a commercial corridor. It is fast-moving stroad which would be rather unpleasant to live on.

Housing units that are built off of Fremont St may be a good option, but I do not support building housing directly on Fremont St.

Currently this is a drive-through area with too much land area devoted to single-level parking lots, with few services for residents and more for visitors staying in motels or attending Fairgrounds events. I'd like to see more multi-story residential along Fremont, with ground-floor retail that would attract people in the neighborhood (coffee shops & cafes, small retail stores, small neighborhood market -- BiRite or Valnizza-size, not Safeway size).

There's great access for biking and to transit. Waive some parking requirements to reflect easy access to bike paths and transit. And consider an off-site neighborhood parking garage/garages as part of some development, to accommodate the cars both of residents and their visitors.

This area has plenty of housing options. We built a bike lane in the middle of Fremont that goes unused for the most part because there is no reason for people to visit that part of town.

I would love to see more festivals and music at the Fairgrounds along with more business. I would love to see that area of town start becoming like a mini Alvarado street or Broadway St.

I am a huge proponent of solutions for both Affordable Housing and the Homeless Population. Taller, multistructure buildings need to be a priority. Bus line access would be important, even if 2 - 3 transfers are needed.

I think new housing should have an open feel and care should be taken to ensure parking for at least two cars per household (not including curb parking) as this is more realistic than one. Street parking congestion can create safety issues and opportunities for vandalism. Green spaces should also be available for safe walking and leisurely activities. Pedestrian access and safety need to be considered including crossings with push button lights.

I would like to see more high density housing here to utilize the space with community and green spaces including more tree line streets. Mixed use housing spaces with some commercial options would be a great.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 133, Packet Page 264 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-88 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Nothing should be over 3 stories. Commercial should be on first floor facing North Fremont.

THis are should be used for commercial use.

Mixed use mid-rise apartments with commercial properties at street level facing Fremont. Low-rise apartments and condos on interior properties.

This area has some space but traffic on fremont needs to be considered. Again affordable housing is needed and this is an area that seems to have quite a bit of space. However, a lot is medical buildings and you can see trailers parked everywhere. Maybe a lot with tiny homes where people could also keep their trailers would be helpful. A few apartment buildings would also help. Less traffic in some of these areas but some one lane roads to consider for rush hours.

Revitalize North Fremont!
Clean-up of North Fremont; remove old structures around N Fremont & Airport Road; Develop a Fast Food location in this vacinity.

Reduce parking allocations to 1 car only. Subsidize transit or create incentives for single car Households. Do traffic calming measures, increase curb appeal, sidewalk conditions, lighting and trees. Make the area pretty to encourage residents to come visit. Look at City of Seaside Broadway/Obama Way in terns of curb appeal and pedestrian forward design. Add beauty to the area, seriously lacking in curb appeal.

The road itself is the biggest impediment to improving this area. The central bike alley needs to be removed, and have the protected lanes moved to the sides where cyclists can access the side roads and businesses without crossing traffic lanes. The entrance and exit of the bike alley is also super dangerous and the lead nowhere. The surrounding areas do not need big apartment buildings, but allowing residents to have ADUs and break their residences into multiplexes. the lots highlighted along the road should not be converted into housing, but should focus on commercial development.

This would be place for more housing, but with the higher rise complexes farther away from Fremont. Mix the use so that we do not create a "wall" of high-rise apartments and have small parks for families to use for the relaxation.

It should be attractive for Fremont Blvd traffic. Housing here would serve people without cars who can access the bus line and bike paths to get to work.

A pedestrian overpass on N. Fremont would make walking to Safeway safer for those living in this area. More trees are always welcome.

I think this area could be utilized with bigger accommodations for apartments and townhouses and four-plexes. this would be great to increase use of our bus lines and bike lanes. I think the development should include small park areas in the design where families can play and rest. We wouldn't want a "wall" of housing that neglects different heights for housing options some closer, some farther from Fremont and grass areas (Park areas) visible to Fremont Avenue traffic.

This area is currently such a disaster. The Fairgrounds neighborhood wants to limit commercial development along N. Fremont, but I disagree. This area should be commercial with buffers ( green belts, parks etc) to maintain quality of life in near by residential areas. There is already a lot of high density housing in this area without parking needs met, so that needs to be considered. Unless the City steps up and makes a bike route along Casa Verde to connect with the rec trail, people won't bike this part of town. I have tried. The "bike path to no where" needs to connect to CV. That is the natural traffic flow. The Laguna Grande extension will be too far out of the way for most commuters. But it will be great for tourism!
In a perfect world, the Fairgrounds would move out on the outskirts of town..and housing could be put in there.

The Navy golf course needs to go. It's not fair to our City for such a central and large piece of property to benefit Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 134, Packet Page 265 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-89
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” such a small amount of people. Maybe the Fairgrounds could move there? The airport needs to expand towards Ryan Ranch, and give up any ideas to send traffic thru the Fair grounds area towards North Fremont. It's already too congested.

I emphasize with our City planners when it comes to figuring out the North Fremont area. It is really a screwed up area, and needs a completely new vision.

If housing is to be built, there has to be major improvements to parking. This area already has issues with street parking, so improvements to parking would have to be addressed.

This neighborhood is already built out and a portion of the potential use buts up to single family residential. I said a hard no as this neighborhood already has it's fair share of issues from the airport, fairgrounds and traffic jams.

Why do you want to continue to impact only certain neighborhoods of Monterey with the state's mandatory housing and completely keep out of the equation so many other neighborhoods in Monterey that are low density and could absorb some additional housing including apartments? This neighborhood who has shouldered a lot from the city should not even be on this list. That is not very equitable.

Since the City of Monterey is choosing to exclude a large majority of it's neighborhoods that could absorb a good portion of the new State's housing requirements I recommend that the majority of the housing requirements could and should be met by developing thoughtful, well planned new neighborhoods withing the ranges of Fort Ord, Garden Road and Ryan Ranch. Mass transit could be expanded and there would not be a need for plazas etc. as these neighborhoods could be built to be in tune with nature and be beautiful and quiet. This would be very desirable and would appeal to a variety of people and economic means.

Keeping dwellings away from the noise and traffic of Fremont is important. Clearly, young families with small children should not be safely housed next to this busy street; apartments, set back from Fremont with noise reduction built in could have potential. Dwellings placed facing away from the "main drag" could be possible.

Thoughtful planning for conveniences needed for those who dwell near N. Fremont could be very helpful.

Changing a largely commercial area into a life-giving living space could make it an attractive area for affordable housing as well as other dwellings.

Build more apartments. Reclaim wasteful commercial/office spaces to be converted to and/or replaced with housing.

There are so many areas that can have multiple level apts or hotel on top with parking underneath. Knock down unused or dilapedated buildings for large parking to support fairgrounds.

God knows we need more housing here to revitalize this area and make use of that bike path! Something absolutely needs to be done about how impossible it is to cross over Highway 1 on Fremont as a pedestrian. Mark Thomas has potential but is fairly unsafe for inexperienced cyclists/pedestrians.

We must minimize large-surface-area ground-level-only parking lots.

Need more mix of shops and housing
I want the folks who work in the area to be able to live in the area.

Enhance walkable and bike able places
Envision development with retail ground floor/office-commercial 2nd floor/residential 3-4 floors; public transportation currently exists although there may be gaps currently versus employment hubs locations now or future.

Need roundabouts to help with traffic congestion
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 135, Packet Page 266 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-90 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” PITIFUL, just make things look nice in this Godforsaken corridor.

Already dense.

The fairgrounds should actually be moved to Salinas. It is the county seat and Salinas has room. Low and mid rise apt/condos would be a good fit here. The jazz festival and other music venues bring a lot of commerce into the area so the existing "horse arena" s/b kept or even better, rebuilt into a real concert hall.

Already crowded with apartments
The fairgrounds are kept clean. They obviously lack real interest or charm. More trees, small ones, benches, playlots, cafes would help.

Another area of town that would benefit from thoughtful development that increases housing stock and economic activity. Here again the restraints of historical preservation or trying to maintain a particular vibe are not a big factor in this part of town that is nearly charmless. Great opportunity to set a new style to reinvent this district fo4 the future. More housing, commercial property and for goodness sake, how about including trees and greener spaces
There are a lot of empty lots/ places that used to have businesses on North Fremont. These areas could be built up to be used as new shops and housing for whomever needs a place to live. Affordable housing. The area across from CVS is a huge lot....used to be Eddie's. Caruso's is empty. The land where Bay Pet Hospital was located is empty and the little (?) lot where Joe's Christmas trees is located...is empty Not sure we need more motels or grocery stores, but apartments with enough parking for tenants and guests would be nice. Is there some reason these places are not being used? Are the owners holding out for more money? Maybe a lid on the sale of the property?
Parking is an extemely necessary issue.

I don't see much extra space in this area. The bike path that goes down the middle of Fremont was a ridiculous waste of money. It's definitely a hazard for cars, bikes and people! Also, it needs to be cleaned up. There are so many run-down areas and panhandlers. Start by cleaning things up and getting rid of the hobos! For those areas not directly adjacent to single family homes, like the CVS Pharmacy location, mid-rise apartments would be reasonable, especially with retail space at the ground level. Some additional green space/park area should be factored into these areas. I would not recommend building a mid-rise apartments in areas next to single family home neighborhoods.

I currently live in this area (just off Casa Verde) in one of the many aging apartment complexes. The area feels more "run down" area in Monterey, which means more room for much-needed improvements for residents. It's also the most affordable area in our city of Monterey, which is becoming uncontrollably gentrified by investors and vacation homeowners. Fremont needs a lot of love, and we need that beautiful bike path to better connect to the greater area. I think that, on Fremont in particular, mid-rise apartments and condos would be a great addition. It could be businesses on the bottom and residences in the top levels. Make things walkable! The problem with this area is noise and air pollution given the airport. Fremont car traffic contributes to this. We deal with this now in our apartment. This means that we need to build sustainably-minded buildings with thick window glazing and ensure there's extra greenery to take in all that Co2. This area is very "renter" heavy, so it needs to be balanced with more opportunities for homeownership. Whenever an area is too renter- or owner-heavy, it creates inequity.

Whatever we do in any area of the city, please prioritize housing for community members, not investors or second-home dwellers. Please help us build inclusive, diverse sustainable communities across Monterey. I'm tearing up just thinking about how much I want this for my city.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 136, Packet Page 267 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-91
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Building in this area would allow those that are able to walk to many shops, restaurants.

And with the corridor bike lane as well as car lanes, easy in and out access for those who need to drive.

I think there may also be potential again for ADUs, as there are single family homes on both sides of Fremont.

Trees. Parking & businesses under apts. Decibel monitors w cameras for those loud vehicles! Parklets.

This area has residential neighborhoods that have already been degraded by many apartment complexes. To add more, would tip it to the "rental" community side leaving homeowners discouraged. Adequate parking is a current problem, so adding residences would mean adding parking to accommodate them. I would have checked low-rise apartments IF they were located on Fremont.

So many great opportunities here with easy access to CVS, Safeway, restaurants. It is a little tricky crossing Fremont, but the new road work has improved that.

Improve all aspects of Active Transportation infrastructure, creating more protected and connected bike lane networks. Fix(move to a better location) that useless protected bike lane in the center lane down Fremont.

Love this solution. This area would benefit from this!
There are too many motels along this corridor. I'm not sure I've ever seen a time when they were full, some have no cars, some have a few. I don't understand why the city is building yet another motel where the Caruso Italian restaurant/Casa Verde Inn used to be when we do not need more motels for temporary visitors but affordable housing for people who live and work here. Wrong decision. This corridor would be a good area for low to midrise apartments and townhomes, or even mixed use business with apartments on second and third floors, or even live-work studios/lofts for the small business owners who can't afford storefront rent in addition to housing. We definitely don't need more single family homes. There are no affordable places to live for single adults who don't make over 50K a year and don't have a significant other and do not wish to suddenly try to find a roommate after being able to afford to live alone for the past 20, but with skyrocketing rents and landlords only looking at making the most money, people are getting pushed out of Monterey.

Way more landscaping. Areas to hang outside safely without having to buy something. This area needs to be much better maintained, and made appealing for the many, many who already live there.

What about putting landscape on that bike trail that nobody uses? Please consider building mixed-use properties with commercial units on the bottom and residential levels above on Fremont.

The existing bike path fencing makes this area more of a freeway to Seaside than it was before. It is hard to cross to the other side of the street. Housing here would perhaps give the bike path more clients, especially if it would continue onto downtown somehow. This area would benefit from housing, both for the rental potential and the local businesses.

This entire area is now disconnected with the other boundaries of the City of Monterey and could be better served if it were ceded to the City of Seaside.

Housing and commercial development could turn this area into a lively district, especially if that development is pedestrian oriented. Commercial development should be geared to residents, not tourists.

However, we must improve traffic flow and create practical transportation alternatives before we pack in more people.

Not many of the lower- and mid-market motel properties seem to have been identified as potentially additive to our housing stock, even if lower density is required to accommodate the airport safety zone. It seems that the Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 137, Packet Page 268 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-92 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” demands of the housing requirements for the Peninsula likely outweigh any obligation to continue to provide (somewhat) lower cost, low-density visitor lodging options in place of somewhat higher density housing.

I support housing units in this area where there are already structures and areas available for housing.

However, there is NO room for widening the main No Fremont--it's not even easy to make a right turn with the curbs that were put in. All said, more units in this small area mean more traffic, hence developers should be held to infrastructure needs, upgrades etc (including roads and ON SITE parking) to accommodate the density of people/vehicles/traffic for that development. (Such as in the case of the other developments that get passed -- like Casa Verde Inn hotel where the developer somehow managed to snag a single story 18 room hotel and got approved by the city for a 3 story 36 room hotel -- where/how is the water for THAT approved when single family lots that have been waiting in the same vicinity can't get a water credit for a sink!!?? -- and the developer got through the vehicle/parking loop by saying they would not need parking and would be using public transit?! ) WE all must be more vigilant and hold developers accountable for covering ALL aspects of a development impact on the surrounding area BEFORE they are approved. Especially in one with little room for more traffic, parking and already densely filled with many apartment complexes.

No vision. It's a strip mall, uninteresting busy corridor. Apartments seem the only realistic option.

It would be nice to have some community parks in this area, more green open space that is publicly accessible at all times, rather than just the Fairgrounds.

This area may be OK for additional housing, since part of it is zoned commercial. Please do not allow multi-family units in or adjacent to single-family residential areas!! Keep it greener! Utilize inactive buildings for combination business/residence Avoid r-1 zoned properties next to r-3+
North Fremont could benefit from an architectural renaissance,. That are of the City seems a little run down and doesn't seem to provide much incentive for people to visit or live there as it is. More multifamily units along North freemont would be a benefit to the area businesses and the vibrancy of the area and of the City.

The single family area next to North Fremont is adorable and hopefully will be maintained as such. The multifamily area on the other side of North Fremont has become a maize of multifamily buildings packing as many people into the smallest spaces possible. That's probably not good to replicate.

North Fremont seems a bit run down and like an area of the City with not a lot to do offering few reasons to visit.

The Fremont corridor seems as if it can use an architectural uplift and I believe that business in that are of the City would benefit from nicer, mixed use, multi-story buildings with residential. The architectural uplift bringing more residents could be a boon to the area and to the City. As it is now, many people are not drawn to that area. A mixed use architectural renaissance in that area could help create a more vibrant area of the City. There seems to be only a few sites indicated on the North Fremont map as having high development potential. My feeling about North Fremont is that it needs much more development than that.

The above presumes that parking and safety can be solved. I've heard it said that parking can be solved by placing parking structures within 1000 feet of a residential building. I don't believe this is true. Families with small or young children, people returning home from a long days work with bags of groceries and people both young and old with injuries and mobility issues for example will not easily use parking 1000 fee away from home. Other solutions need to be sought such as on site parking in addition to multiple transportation modalities with all age groups and physical abilities in mind.,
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 138, Packet Page 269 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-93
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Some of the motels have extraordinarily large parking lots that could be better utilized. Building height should not exceed 3 stories to preserve character.

I would love to have a big bookstore here, ideally next to a cat cafe'! Also -- more businesses that are open 24 hours or at least until midnight. It always feels like they "roll up the sidewalks" around here about 8 p.m., when I get off of work. A community garden could be a nice touch, as well. Finally -- these ADUs are terrible for renters -- please do not allow them, as much as possible!
It looks like a health risk and could invites law-suits to the city.

This is an easy place to commute from given the freeway access. People could live here and commute up to CSUMB, or into Monterey/Carmel via car. The bike lane on Fremont is confusing and I'm not sure it's properly linked to the trails or for people who would really use it (students mostly).

Again, another corridor that would be good for a road diet and dedicated bus lane to aid transt oriented development. Maybe the bike lanes along this route could be repurposed into some BRT stations I would support some additional apartment complexes in this area. It would need to include parking. I do not support trying to add over 3,000 new houses in Monterey.

Support mixed use
You have a lot of blight in this area along with many empty lots. I would like to see multiuse buildings in this area with a lot of green space.

Mixed use development would be appropriate in this area. Again, the city should look for ways to reimagine Fremont Street so that it is safer for pedestrians and cyclists. The protected bike lanes are a good start, but the automobile is still the priority in this area, and it shouldn't be.

This neighborhood does not have much walking appeal even though it has lots of businesses as Fremont is so busy and large. Mixed use commercial ground floor and residential above seems like a good idea. leave alone the single family home section where there are too many cars and is too dense already. in undeveloped lots add rental units
due to transit, maybe ADU and low rise apts especially with proximity to fairground that would really make it difficult to single family homes
Several of the opportunity sites in this could accommodate mixed use developments with 3-5 stories of housing on top of retail on the ground floor.

This area is a diamond in the rough. Housing with higher densities could help revitalize the area.

I'd like to see this area become safer for pedestrians. There are a mix of shops, restaurants, other businesses and houses already in this area, but it can be scary to cross the street. Whether it is people traveling too fast or unfamiliar with the roads/rules, it can feel unsafe. If we build more housing, we could have an issue with parking, or we could make it easy and safe to walk/bike so people would be more comfortable not having a personal vehicle.

Needs a focus on continued bike lane additions and support for pedestrian walkways and street crossings. Great potential for live/work/shop without getting in a car.

If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 139, Packet Page 270 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-94 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” I'd like to see parking but also attention to walkability. I recommend we be good neighbors by not building more than 2 stories high. When we block out sunlight from existing properties, that decreases the quality of life for the adjoining properties. For the property on Fairgrounds Rd, we need to accommodate a drug store here. It will still be needed in this neighborhood.

Mix of housing and commercial, market, ped plazas.

This neighborhood is a mix, I think apartment complexes would do well, the incorporating of apartmenst more than 3 rooms
I believe there is room to expand Monterey by redevelopment in this area.

There is so much potential in this neighborhood. There have been vacant buildings and lots for so many years. The proximity to the fairgrounds, shopping, restaurants and highway 1 make it a great place to put high density housing. There is already a lot of high density housing by Dela Vina and Ramona so it makes sense to include more along Fremont. There is room for higher buildings without blocking view. The airport noise is a consideration but the amount of planes is pretty small. The walkway built in the middle on Fremont is strange and it's not clear it's intended use.

This area is like a wet cat. Bedraggled and smelling. What potential! The bike lane is an isolated sore spot that is not used much. The buildings are mostly old and ugly.

New housing should be affordable!!
The bike infrastructure here never made sense to me. As a bike rider, I prefer Fairground Road and Bruce Lane. As pedestrian, I never want to walk down Fremont as the sidewalks on some parts are practically non-existent.

We will need strategies to manage parking in the neighborhood Secured Parking
This area is already housing heavy - It would be nice to see it done better/ to the benefit of the residents. The bike lane down Fremont doesn't serve it's purpose. More/ better crosswalks would be more beneficial. Pedestrain overpasses? Speed bumps along the E/W streets like Ramona and Dela Vina to slow down speeding to / from Fremont. Redevelop the smaller hotel parcels into more housing and/ or build above these structures. Are there processes that could be sped up in the development process? The hotel project on the corner of Fremont and Casa Verde has been stalled for over a decade.

I think there should be solid focus on making this a pretty high density corridor. I also think this would be a good spot to put a few affordable housing projects. as part of the redevelopment of this whole corridor I think it would be important to make really solid pedestrian and bicycle connections to both the coast and downtown montereyin addition to Sand City where a lot of really interesting stuff is happening. If you can make those connections and build the housing, it will make this area feel more attractive to both residents and developers. There is already a good grocery store, but it would also be nice to maintain several restaurants and possibly something interesting and quirky like a food truck court- this way the neighborhood might become more of a "draw" much like Sand City is becoming. I also think there is a lot of potential for the fairgrounds to be modernized and reimagined as it feels like a very large and underutilized parcel that, if turned into more of a park like setting, could become a neat asset to people living on that side of town.

Add residential over commercial mid-rise buildings on Fremont. Finish bike path.

Mixed use.

There is a great opportunity to make North Fremont a much nicer place to live and shop than it is now. Along with housing there could be more trees, walking paths, and a more cohesive community rather than the ugly Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 140, Packet Page 271 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-95
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” stretch around Fremont (and Fremont itself). Using the Broadway/Seaside beautification model would be a good visioning place to start.

There is already a lot of shopping, restaurants, etc., and good transportation (including bike path) here, so some urban planning could go into making it a really nice place to live.

Safe walkways along busy roads. Gated parks and community space for children and pets to play.

Make the hotels bigger so they can accommodate more events. Not nearly enough hotel space here.

This area isn't the safest, and honestly that bike path is absolutely a disaster. No one wants to ride their bike in the middle of such a busy road. I support housing being built pretty much anywhere we can, but in my opinion this would be the area to put the most affordable housing - the cheapest. Its really not a great area, and should be everyone's last resort. It would be great to actually have the option to look at nicer places, and not so great places.. that way people can actually prioritize what they want. Nowadays, you apply to anything and everything in the hopes that your name gets chosen out of the million applications.. and you don't get to even have a say if its somewhere you actually like or not. Having the option to downgrade is actually a good thing, and this would be that downgrade location.

PARKING NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE. The city makes WAY TOO MUCH money off of residents getting tickets while at work or at home, or the parking garages. Its just ridiculous and greedy.

This part of town needs more greenery (less concrete) and a central community park/play area/quad/meeting space for community gathering off the main road for farmers markets, craft fair, childrens park, etc. Currently, it feels extremely busy, commercial, vehicle-oriented, and like a concrete jungle. i would like to see some more low income housing in this area, possibly using existing motels. High rise 4 to 5 stories seems out of place with the existing profile. Can some of the fairgrounds land be used? How about Residential Pipeline lot, former bar on Fremont?
In addition to the current mix of uses, I think it would be useful to add affordable housing for working people in this area. I would want to take advantage of the opportunity to develop housing that accommodates diverse residents and helps alleviate gaps in avg income and rent prices between Seaside and Monterey. The affordable apartments would also generate more business in this area, and could even be developed with the commercial use on the ground floor and a few housing units above.

Given what a busy thoroughfare this area is, and with the mixed nature of the residential/commercial existing use, I would support infill housing on the scale of multiunit, multi level building. It is important that parking is mitigated by including it in any new building footprint, rather than allow the cars to sprawl down city streets.

This is also an area I would highly encourage mixed use building with businesses on the bottom floor and residential above.

Some larger apartment complexes would be ok or duplexes. In general Freemont needs to have the old 50's store fronts revitalized and bring some newer mixed use to this area. Some better restaurants and brew pubs would be nice. The remake of Downtown Seaside is even nicer than Freemont street.

Fremont is not a road for residential. This should be kept for businesses. Who wants to live on a crowded busy street no matter the setback. This is not a place for children, nor animals that can easily get hit. BAD IDEA TO BUILD on Fremont.

This area needs to be revitalized. There are too many vacant and depressed businesses. I see new housing as a catalyst that could lead to renewal. The housing should be higher density. Mixed retail residential housing would be best.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 141, Packet Page 272 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-96 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Good area to develop and shop. However the bike lane from cuts the entire area in half. What is happening with the old Gemini site and the empty veternarian car sales lots?? Tick-tock…… If the bike path that starts here connected to south Fremont, it would bring a large amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic which would open this sad corridor up from being very car-centric and low-rent to desirable.

Family-friendly businesses would do so much better if families could more easily get here and it wasn't basically a large off/on ramp for the highway. A pedestrian/bicycle bridge that connected this to the south would be amazing! On the west/ north side of Fremont no dense housing should be allowed. This area has to many apartment and existing condos, the density is to much already except for single family units.

This appears to be an area with more options due to the large commercial businesses in the area, such as Embassy Suites. I am NOT endorsing anything near that height, but believe that a mix of different types of housing can be added in this area. Again, we have traffic issues, and buildings could (if not properly sound-proofed) be unlivable.

Must make N Fremont more walking accessible, the multitude of driveway cuts, some abandoned but still there, make level walking dangerous. Especially the abundance of obstructions on the sidewalks. Abandoned buildings and vacant commercial need
The Streetscape plan implemented as a priority. Vacant or abandoned buildings need monthly fines, lazy landlords, refusing to lower rents need to sell or face stiff fines. This area has neeb stagnating for decades because of lack of city interest
I think a good model for this area is the section when you approach Lighthouse Ave coming out of Old Monterey's tunnel -- with nice shop fronts and apartments above. A new market (replacing Peninsula Market on Del Monte), or grocery store (Trader Joes) would be advantageous if additional housing here as the Safeway in this area is always packed. Connecting bike paths would also need to be a priority to maximize use of the current bike path in the median with other areas.

Do not mix high density housing with single family home neighborhoods. This kind of development degrades the character and aesthetics of a single family home neighborhood no matter what developers or City officials say.

Dense housing projects should only be developed on major corridors/streets.

This would be a good location for ground-level commercial with residential spaces on upper floors. This can be in the form of condos or apartments. Creative parking solutions would need to be considered.

Same as previous
Would be great to see development in this area with a character similar to Broadway in Seaside, but with more housing incorporated.

I just want to see the empty land used to build affordable housing with parking provided. There are way too many empty lots with weeds that could be put to use. I’d also like to see the bike trail completed in both directions, south and then west to the rec trail and northeast through Del Rey Oaks. I would love to see the community center opened again. Such a waste that it just sits there, when we could utilize it for neighborhood meetings and such. I’m hoping we can get quality commercial use too, not too many Big Joe’s Smoke Shop type places.

Again, kicking the poor people out of Monterey by building new housing here Airport noise is an issue. (Stop airport expansion!) Clean up the blight, abandoned buildings/lots. Make the area livable. Include park space and trees to beautify it.

Need more parking included in any new housing..

On site parking needs to allow for 2 parking spaces per unit. Many renters are couples with 2 cars, even in one Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 142, Packet Page 273 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-97
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” bedroom units. I live in this area and any renters with 2 cars struggles to find parking on street for 2nd car after 3pm. And guests...well, it's nuts out there!
Build apartments and townhouses where public transit can be used instead of requiring cars to go everywhere.

More small grocery stores, shops and restaurants under housing for convenience creating walkable neighborhoods for new residents as well as existing residents behind the Fremont area. Love the plaza idea. trees on the street always help.

I think that apartment complexes will really help the housing issue. Median and lower income populations are more likely to be renters (at least for now) so apartments are more appropriate than town houses or condominiums in this area. Some light industrial space is necessary for businesses like auto repair.

It is important to have balanced use between business and residential in this area.

New residential buildings should be mixed-use with stores and restaurants incorporated into the design.

Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Ensure there are adequate alternative transportation options for residents to reduce the need for personal vehicle conveyance.

As a resident of the North Freemont neighborhood, there is so much that can be done to improve. This neighborhood has so much potential due to its proximity to parks, public transit, and businesses. Housing is this area is mostly single family units, with some smaller apartment complexes. This drives the cost of living up. We would greatly benefit from multi-family units in this neighborhood which would increase available housing stock and reduce prices. Many of the "houses" in the neighborhood are secretly converted into multi-family rentals already, why not make it official? Additionally, while the biking lanes on North Freemont are amazing, why do they suddenly end at the N. Freemont / 218 intersection? This makes them only functionally useful for about a mile and it's dangerous to continue to bike beyond that. As this neighborhood grows, it's important to prioritize people and walkability and not cars. Building the community around public transit and non-car transportation (such as biking and walking) will reduce noise pollution, improve air-quality, and provide a better quality of life to residents.

Please build more housing! We need more housing of all types and we need it soon! North Fremont is full of pitiful little shacks and empty shacks on huge lots, as well as several vacant lots.

I would like all those shacks torn down and replaced by6-story apartment buildings with shops , restaurants and other services on the bottom, with underground parking. The bicycle path should be extended and actually go somewhere. In back of these buildings should be a green belt with play areas for children. Small van-type busses with frequent stops can shuttle people up and down Fremont St.

A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation and to commercial and public services
This could be a good area for additional housing, provided traffic and parking impacts are managed.

This area would be very good for some high density housing as their are many resources (grocery stores, restaurants, entertainment) close by.
homeless encampments need to be dealt with rather than just moved. fremont bike path needs to connect to something for it to make sense -- connecting to the bike rec trail and possibly work with Seaside to have it extend through to La Salle
There are already a lot of shops there. With the right mix of housing and shops I can see this area rivaling Alvarado St., especially if a conference center was built in this area. When the Fairground has events there are parking issues. So, again, parking strategies will be needed
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 143, Packet Page 274 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-98 Community Survey Report
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” I mostly see Fremont as a commercial zone, but we could maximize the potential for mixed-use developments here. Directly facing North Fremont, I think there should only be mixed-use developments. Off the main street, mid-rise apartments, condos, and townhouses make sense.

Another potential spot for live-work studios since it's already pretty loud over there.

ADUs should be allowed in the single-family housing blocks.

City of Monterey HAS TO work with the cities of Del Rey Oaks and Seaside on making bicycle infrastructure make sense on Fremont Ave. The "bicycle boulevard to nowhere" is not going to sell people on living over here.

And it doesn't help people safely get to school and work. Fremont currently isn't a nice place to walk around, so any housing developments should be coupled with sidewalk and street landscaping improvements.

This neighborhood is poorly planned with parking lots prioritized over pedestrian paths and if it is redeveloped, it would be a great opportunity to make it more walkable and more pleasant.

Water permits need! Businesses on the lower level and housing above.Traffic mitigation will be a problem. Don't think that the bike lane in the middle of the road accomplished much.

This part of town needs more greenery, trees, and vegetation. Another little pocket park or two int eh neighborhoods on both side of Fremont would be nice.

Hotel/motel, lodging and shop, office..

Maintain a lot of mixed use area. Parking should be built into any new residential projects for residents. New housing should not be available to those looking for investment properties and/or 2nd/3rd/4th homes. Do NOT force the bowling alley out or the cvs!
Affordable workforce and senior housing are essential. Good locations for them here. Supermarket and pharmacy within walking distance.

Four stories in this area. This area should have a mix of housing and shops, with a plaza for socializing and listening to live music.

This area would be best served for more new businesses.

Fremont Street offers transit, food, support for housing.

Another area that is perfect for multi-family housing. Too many motels - convert them to housing when possible, and make them taller.

This is a great area for housing. Esp with the bike lane just added. It seems this area is underutilized. But pretty up the street with more trees and planters. Maybe old fashionwd post street lights,.

This region could use more housing but not so dense as to cause angst and stress amongst its citizens. Additionally, small parks within housing region (with passcoded overnight access to eliminate unhoused camping) would allow for growth and enjoyment of the families living there.

Maybe if more people lived in this area, the very underutilized bike lane down the middle of North Fremont would be used more.

Off street parking should always be required.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 144, Packet Page 275 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-99
North Fremont Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Less street vagrants & houseless; parking structures in this area would be good, with free shuttles to downtown, fisherman's wharf & cannery row. These parking structures could also support the various events at the Fairgrounds.

Planting trees in this area would make it more welcoming and attractive.

Any and all housing should be encouraged along this route, along with accessibility to multi use buildings containing food, restaurants, entertainment, and more.

A neglected area that could use a new vision of businesses on main road with housing behind, into neighborhood. townhouses and cleaner, new motels for the corridor. more parking for the fairgrounds.

Cede the entire area to Seaside. It is now called North Monterey with no real connection to the rest of the Monterey City. It is Seaside in character and location and serves that city with existing Fair Grounds commercial development and transient accommodations.

Again, parking needs to be taken into consideration.

This area is an embarrassment - rutted roads, run down store fronts, odd bike lane that isn't safe for pedestrians or bicyclists, ugly plants. It looks like a developing nation (I know because I live in them part of the year). Create a neighborhood / business group. Give the area an identity & act like it's part of the city your hired to manage or voted in to represent.

Improve quality of life for existing residents - add green space, better lighting, & clean up overhanging plants on residential sidewalks. Absentee landlords can participate without putting the burden (higher rents) on their tenants.

This area is in dire need of revitalization. It is the least desirable area to live or visit. There are several empty lots that have been sitting as such for years. It seems as if we are missing out on additional city revenue by leaving this corridor as seedy and shabby as it is. Our fairgrounds pulls visitors in but we need more to keep them here. I'd love to see this area develop up-and-coming restaurants, breweries and boutique hotels. The seedy motels have to go.

As for housing and any new construction, my vision would be to have architecturally interesting buildings that perhaps lean toward mid-century modern to honor the history of this part of town. No big-box, cookie cutter type of construction. Less concrete parking lots and more trees. North Fremont is lacking character due to the lack of vision of the previous generation when this area was developed commercially. Let's undo that damage and make this part of town just as charming as the rest.

This is one of the best areas in Monterey for additional residential development. Safeway is convenient, there's a bikeway, access to Hwy 1 is easy.

Need coffee shops and amenities for residents.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 145, Packet Page 276 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-100 Community Survey Report

GARDEN ROAD/AIRPORT/HIGHWAY AREA
Garden Road/Airport/Highway 68 Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Avoid building on open space on the south side of hwy 68. Development of townhomes or low slung apartment buildings in the areas on the south side of Garden Rd are OK, so-so. If developed then making sure the bike, walking and transit options are available so those homes don't just add to traffic on 68.

There has to be a vision for this area that includes walking paths linking it to beach, downtown as well as gathering areas. Shops so people can take care of essentials and have a gathering area, outdoor area. Monterey needs to do a better job of offering activities that draw people to come together. We’ve lost that small town feeling; it’s like we’re all in service to tourists and don’t do anything to give locals gathering areas away from the wharf. Fewer kids, families só but we still need to build community.

Mixed use neighborhood retail, grocery, gas, convenient store, open space or park like setting Future growth should be supported by alternative modes of transportation, particularly a protected bike lane that connects Ryan Ranch though the 68 corridor.

I just want to have the ability to own property near where I work one day. I worked really hard as a Marine and in graduate school after that, and am now an extremely rare case having been hired back to be a Korean language assistant professor at DLI as a civilian after being a DLI student myself around 10 years ago. And yet I have no hope of ever owning property in the area with a pay of about $83,000 a year. DLI Faculty are highly skilled, highly educated, extremely hard working professionals who do critically important work for this country and yet we by and large have to rent simply due to the location of the Presidio. And property managers can gouge as much rent as they want because they can rely on the federal government to increase our locality pay just enough to keep pace. commercial due to noise from airplanes. No housing now
Probably all of the above could work. Adding shops would help.

This area along Mtry-Salinas Hwy (SR 68) especially Tarpy Flats has the best available vacant land for meeting most of the needs for space for 3,654 units of new housing of various price ranges. THIS WILL REQUIRE A CHANGE TO THE HIWAY 68 AREA PLAN BY VOTE OF THE PEOPLE OF MONTEREY! Do NOT recommend converting any more of the major commercial buildings along Garden Road (four have already been approved for conversion to residential uses).

The JOBS - HOUSING BALANCE do not need to be impacted any further with conversion of commercial buildings to residential uses!!!!
Similarly, Ryan Ranch should remain commercial and not converted to residential. ONE EXCEPTION: Cityowned property on former Fort Ord when water is available! High density housing in areas of unused office buildings Need to address traffic on 68.

This would be a great place to have additional housing, it's not very walkable and the proximity to the airport might not be as desirable.

This is a good area for higher density housing and housing of all kinds. There is a lot of underutilized land opposite office spaces. My only concern is how increased housing in this are may impact traffic on 68.

Another great area for high-density housing -- both rentals and owned homes. I'd lean toward higher densities, mix of apartments and townhomes; with some storefront retail to serve residents and give it more of a Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 146, Packet Page 277 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-101
neighborhood feel. Cafes/coffee houses could also serve folks who work on Garden Road/at the airport. Great access for biking and transit.

This area is underutilized and needs more high density housing.

I am pretty neutral to any housing in this area, especially because I feel like there are limited drawbacks and I think there are not many community stakeholders. But the area is pretty sterile and isolating and it would take effort to provide a community feel if that was desired.

Bike lanes and buses for Monterey and salinas commuters. Buses are An excellent way to minimize traffic.

Affordable housing
This is an ideal area (excluding Garden Road which should remain commercial/office) for new housing but should maintain the scale of Monterey as it is now.

Traffic congestion is a problem in this area already, more housing would just exacerbate the issue. Perhaps a traffic circle at Jocelyn Canyon and HWY 68 would help some.

This area needs to go either one way or another. Development should coordinate with future plans for the airport and any expansion of commercial and private flights. The area lacks continuity with other residential areas, and public transportation needs to be considered
All types of housing could go here but it seems most buildings are fancy and medical. One lane road needs to be considered for traffic and the need for affordable housing for both small and extended working class families. No more
mansions that are unaffordable even for professionals like me with a PhD! This would be wonderful area for teachers lower income family neighborhood Dense housing
Convert derelict commercial buildings to condos or townhomes. No need for more commercial, focus on housing here only. Add paved sidewalks and bike paths for safer walking corridor to Fairgrounds /Fremont.

The garden road area is RIPE for residential development. Bigger apartment units can fill a lot of the defunct and unused lots. Along 68 could likely support single family with ADUs and townhomes and small multiplexes.

This is not a good place for apartments being too close to the airport noise. Instead I could see dedicating formalized a parking project for folks living out of their cars.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 147, Packet Page 278 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-102 Community Survey Report
I would indeed like to see a crosswalk and street trees added on Garden Road. I'd like to see more street trees on nearby North Fremont, also. This area could also use a small park where office workers could eat their lunches.

Too close to the airport would not be a good place for housing. I would use this area for dog parks and maybe athletic courts for more outdoor activities. Perhaps though a formalized place overnight parking lot for those living out of their cars.

Beautiful tree lined streets along with a playground/ recreational area for the neighborhood. Please provide a great strategy to manage parking in the neighborhood to avoid unnecessary congestion in surrounding areas.

If housing is developed here, I think they’ll need to be improvements to transportation, and strategies put in place to allow the residents there easier access to Fremont, or Monterey.

This area has a lot of potential to not only meet the State's housing requirements but it could really provide the city with a great opportunity to create beautiful new neighborhoods that would appeal to a large variety of people and economic levels. A well planned grand master plan could create a beautiful housing area with walking paths and a variety of housing that has been designed to be blend in with nature. No plazas are necessary. Just lovely living spaces tucked in thoughtfully within the environment. California native trees and plants to be placed in the landscaping to not only blend with nature but to re-establish that environment that may change due to development.

Unless the city allows expansion of housing into more neighborhoods than that are listed in this survey this, Ryan Ranch and Fort Ord are the ONLY equitable solutions to solve the housing requirement without putting undue burden on already densely full and established neighborhoods that already have their own sets of problems. Please seek your solution within these 3 zones or open up other (not mentioned in the survey) neighborhoods to be fair and equitable.

This is a perfect area to expand housing and create new neighborhoods. Mass transit can be expanded easily into this area. Utilizing this land will take some of the burden off of the already denser neighborhoods (such as in North Monterey) that really do not have the capacity to support more housing without impacting the quality of life, adding more parking problems and general crowding and the multiple impacts that will effect so many people in so many different ways.

Turn this into a dense, walkable neighborhood full of all types of residential and mixed-use properties. There is so much potential here that's wasted on massive parking lots and underutilized office spaces.

Affordable multi-story housing with a few to be dedicated to employees that work in Monterey. Then they do not have to drive from Salinas or elsewhere that continues to clog up Hwy 68.

Higher density and many affordable units for Monterey area employees, especially low income. An example in the Hayward area would be relevant to explore. It has been so successful for low income that there is an expansion to include families.
-It's close to the airport and certain days each week, when any number of jets idle, the fumes smell on the opposite side of 68 from the airport. How can anyone live as close to the airport as Garden Road? -Also, what kind of business would be built? When the fair or the car show happens each year, the residences across 68 hear the trucks, chains, loading and unloading that goes on up on Garden Road. -Traffic is also usually full on 68 to safely access the driveways on 68. (The speed limit of 55 is too high) Don't just dump the high density housing next to the airport, but more housing can't hurt.

Avoid urban sprawl, do not develop on currently undeveloped land I want the folks who work in the area to be able to live in the area.

The water supply does not support additional housing/people, and Highway 68 is crowded enough without adding more drivers.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 148, Packet Page 279 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-103
Maintain hiking areas and expand biking access for all communities to these areas. Allow for ADUs This area should be reserved for much needed light industry. So no housing here.

No ingress or egress for traffic.

There is much open space in this area, north of Upper Ragsdale, across from UPS & CSUMB. Good major infrastructure (roads).

Business area.

Will there be reliable public transportation for people living here? Otherwise traffic is an issue but there seems to ga room to grow.

This is the only part of town I feel a few large housing projects would be appropriate, limiting congestion in more densely populated areas. It still benefits from the quiet location and abundance of trees.

This is an area for businesses, not housing.

This area is seriously underutilized and would have little impact on surrounding residential areas. If residential development is created, neighborhood parks and green areas should be included. Additionally, some mix of retail should be included. The issue will of course be noise from the airport.

Too much noise and air pollution being this close to the airport. It should be reserved for commercial use only. No one deserves to live in a polluted area.
there seems to be lots of potential here for multiple unit dwellings.

Would there be a need for more frequent public transportation as this area is developed? Be sure and leave some green space, and perhaps a walking trail the length of Garden Road? Seems there might also be potential for some small shops in the area that cater to these residents not having to get in their vehicles to get into cars and drive to get the same items.

Residents would need green open space within this area as it's enclosed by major streets and traffic would increase.

Sidewalks and crosswalks, too.

Such a lovely area. Very quiet with office space and trees and lovely weather in Monterey. Also easy access in and out. Outstanding location for housing.

There is so much open land on Olmstead if leaving the airport and going across Highway 68 until you get to the homes that the city or county built years ago as low income housing. Why can't you build on all that open land near where you built the other housing? It seems like the city is trying to cram housing into the smallest lots possible rather than taking over the HUGE empty lots.

Would you live next to the airport?
Yuck, who thinks this is a good idea? Can you imagine the noise trying to live here? Between the airport and the highway, residents won’t be able to sleep. I’m concerned about the impact to the heavy rush hour traffic with this idea
If consideration for this area, any residential dwellings would need to be well sound-proofed for the noises emitted by the airport. Sidewalks and pedestrian safety should also be considered, and limits on commercial parking as to allow for a neighborhood feel for those who would live there. I also think there should be research into noise from the airport, and alter take-off and landing scenarios similar to rules in place in Orange County where the John Wayne airport is close to a residential neighborhood. I also think this could be a good area for mixed use and livework lofts for smaller business owners who can't afford storefront rent in addition to housing costs.

Seems like Garden Rd. Has room for housing units.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 149, Packet Page 280 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-104 Community Survey Report
Absolutely increase housing density in this under-used area.

This would be a great place for some condos, townhomes, apartment buildings. Need to include plaza/parks areas for socializing as it is far from town. Bike paths...?
Develop housing to complement light industrial and office buildings. Expand public transportation to better serve the residential development. Commercial retail or mixed use is probably not a priority..

Assuming the traffic and water issues can be addressed, this area seems like it could provide significant housing development opportunities. Would the City of Monterey consider annexing some of the Monterey County land east of the airport along Highway 68?
I never like the idea of putting low income housing in a flight path so I'm a bit reluctant with my yes. However MRY is a lightly trafficked airport. Seems like a couple of ice communities/neighborhoods (one on either side of 68) could be supported. I don't typically travel 68 at busier times but suspect traffic would be an issue. A few more stoplights would be needed. I think messaging from the city is critical. Adding the required number of units will impose a negative congestion externality on all residents. This burden should be shared across all areas of the city.

The NIMBY mentality should be addressed/rejected by the Mayor and City Council members early in the communication process!
I'd be concerned about noise for residents.

Do not support housing in environmental hazard areas, like the high liquefaction zone indicated in this area.

In general, I do not support developing open space areas like the stretch indicated here along Garden road as a top tier zone. Much of why I and others came here is to have less density of people and if we plan smartly to keep the non-developed areas pristine and free of pavement, structures and people--the more we will keep what makes Monterey desirable and not become another "bay area" city. In just a few short years of living here, I see that we are already headed on that trajectory.

The other thing to keep in the forefront of planning is that Hwy 68 is already miserable to travel both directions at all times of the day/night. Even if it were widened and/or roundabouts eventually were put in, it is currently already so lacking in accommodating current traffic flow that I can't imagine what it would be like adding potentially thousands of livable units in this area.

SUGGESTION of something to implement if it's not already in place: Other states I have lived in had a common, mandatory practice whereby the DEVELOPER MUST plan and pay for infrastructure (roads, bridges, sidewalks, etc) to accommodate vehicle/foot/other traffic increase and needs a result of the project/development. They had to have the infrastructure built and in place AHEAD of the development, so no project would be built or move forward until the roads, etc were in place ahead of development!! This is a good area for additional housing but please do not allow multi-family units adjacent to existing lowdensity single-family residential.

This should remain as a business and industrial development area. You have already added too many housing structures and now we need business to support them.

Garden Road is wedged between the freeway and the airport. There are safety and noise concerns with those uses.

Garden Road seems more suitable for industrial uses than any other in the City of Monterey and Monterey needs some area of the City that will be income and tax generating to supply jobs for people and revenue for services. I do not support housing here as residential is not compatible with industrial activity and airports and freeways are not desirable residential neighbors but they are good industrial neighbors.

This area is/was prime commercial office space and it's disappointing to see businesses move away. I would prefer that this area continue to be used primarily for commercial offices/light industrial.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 150, Packet Page 281 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-105
Health risk & subsequent law suits to the city.

Given all the business and the airport nearby it would be helpful to include some housing close by for some of the staff to live in.

More housing here with a direct bus line to/from airport to downtown through this area would be great.

Move fairgrounds and airport to Marina (old Fort Ord airport for the military) and build a community of mixed houses with activities for families. First availability of these houses should be for medical staff.

Traffic should be a major consideration. Hwy 68 is a main commuter corridor between Salinas and Monterey Peninsula. Traffic at the airport already gets backed up every M-F morning and evening.

I can see using the old office parks and gyms along Garden Road for new apartment buildings as long as there is available parking included. I don’t think more building along HWY 68 makes sense given the already bad traffic congestion. Another residential area would only make it worse.

This is a heavy commercial area that should not have residential mixed in. You are only going to get angry neighbors when the landscaping trucks leave at 6:30am. This area desperately needs sidewalks though! Good location for housing and mixed uses, except for airport. City should retain some commercial-business park sites
I don't think this should be the primary focus area for housing. garden road hwy 68 is our green space, leave it alone, garden road is fine as is and offers a change from urban density, also part of a watershed along hwy 68 and jacks peak more businesses
Mixing housing in with existing commercial uses would work in this area.

Is there an opportunity to develop a "town center"? This could be an area for workers to walk to have lunch and socialize. I have seen in other places, a cluster of restaurants with a central area to eat - fast casual but very good.

I think we should be focusing on areas that already have shops/businesses and could be a nice neighborhood to live in. In my opinion, right next to the airport should be the last option.

More crosswalks and a community park
Maximize the result by building up in multiple stories here, but the question is how much more traffic can this part of the highway handle? It is ideal for people who need to hop on the highway in any direction but handling the flow could be problematic without a lot of planning. Seems like a good opportunity to include park space for residents including a specific area for a dog park.

If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

DOES NOT HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO ADD LOW INCOME IN A COST EFFICIENT WAY.

This area is good for development adding a few more restaurants, and the area would make a good place for parks for children. This area would be good for several bigger homes to accomadate families.

This is a nice area, people may be dissuaded from there due to the airport noise.

Tarpy Flats and the property owned by the MPUSD are prime development parcels that should be annexed to the City and developed with high density housing. Both properties have excellent access via 68 and have utilities at their doorstep
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 151, Packet Page 282 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-106 Community Survey Report
Develop with high priority on pedestrian and bicycle access and maintaining or adding open space surrounding residential areas
I hope the city won't remove trees and green space for development. This would make such a nice residential neighborhood if the airport wasn't there. If more residences are added, consider the walking traffic and safety.

Currently Garden Road is traveled at high speed and adding residences could result in accidents when people pull out if not planned well.

With the airport and industry close by, housing could be added that is more high density. However, that would need more planting along 68 for privacy and noise abatement as well as ways to get in and out of the area. On a special note: ADUs should be encouraged whenever it is not practical to add 2-3 more units to a property lot.

Secured Parking
This area is favorable for higher density homes and will only minimally impact single family homeowners. good public transit connections would be optimal as this location is not as walkable as some other areas of the city.

I support the development of Garden Road...I'm not sure I understand what would be developed on the other side of 68. It seems like a nice green buffer before entering Montery proper. If anything is developed there, it would be nice if it were clustered in such a way so as to avoid strong visibility from 68. I think the redevelopment of Garden Road, which is currently under way, is good case study in why we should be putting more thought into the redevelopment of an entire area like that. We should have thought about open space, what the proper mix of units is, walkability, transportation, and some semblance of architectural cohesion. It just feels like what's happening on Garden road is random, disorganized and poorly designed.

Convert underutilized commercial to residential. Midrise residential over commercial.

Safe walking paths along busy roads. Dedicated gated community space for children and pets to play. Lighted pathways within community for walking.

If no one is using the offices here anymore, make them big complexes and push the abandoned RVs outside of town. The RVs have killed any property value here for offices and companies.

Never expected this area, but I can see how its an option! I think most people would hate living here, because of how loud the planes are. I lived in the Oak Grove neighborhood and had to stop conversations when planes would go over, so I cant imagine how incredibly loud and mentally draining it would be to be that close to the airport.

Honestly, that's gotta be bad for people's mental health... especially during car week.

Preserve some green/park space here for any new residential uses, to ensure the treelined character of the area isn't lost.

This area has potential for development, but not much access to town except by car. Airport noise is an issue, I have lives with it on Caasnova and in Del Rey Oaks and it is annoying, but manageable.

As I currently live near this area, I'd like to more affordable housing added here. Despite the environmental limitations of the airport zone, I believe many people/commuters into Monterey would opt to live here if apartments were developed (repurposing often half empty office buildings).

I would support housing with density, even mid rise apartment buildings off Garden Road and concentrated in that area that is already developed, but would be wary of development further down highway 68 in the open space areas close to the highway. For areas off of Garden Road, higher level buildings would not obstruct a viewshed, parking could be mitigated with build in lots, and public transportation lines can be established to services the area. I would encourage the inclusion of grocery stores and other services in the neighborhood to cut down on short trips that would cause more traffic on 68, Canyon Del Rey and other areas.

Tiers 4 or 5 would be enough. This area is already so congested, with only 1 grocery store for the whole Fremont Del Rey Oaks acre
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 152, Packet Page 283 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-107
No housing should be built on directly on Hwy 68. There is too much traffic already and not a place for children and animals. It's a thoroughfare! If anything, 68 should be kept undeveloped and used for widening decades from now when it's needed. NO HOUSING ON 68!
Given the proximity to the airport, I would see this as commercial rather than residential space. As the airport expands, this would be prime location for a business park, which would be a source of city revenue. Example: A new air air taxi company, Joby, has started in Marina. Why not expand to this area with its airport location, and room for a business headquarters?
Big opportunity for development of single family residences on larger lots East of Olmsted and south of Hwy 68.

Keeping this open space is a waste of resources that we can no longer afford.

Ideal area to build out. Would be nice to have an entire building with only studio and 1 bedroom apartment for single professionals who WORK IN MONTEREY.

Proximity to the airport and little services make this a bedroom community, but it would work for commuters.

High-density housing would work well here.

Good area for all types of housing since most construction there now is commercial….

It would seem that there would be plenty of space to accommodate parking for new developments, and since there is both space for new construction and existing structures which could be converted to housing (as is evidently already in the pipeline) it seems to me an area that would withstand a substantial increase in density. It is also already a pretty environment, although airport noise makes it somewhat less attractive for housing. (On the other hand, for anyone who has ever lived in a large city, virtually anywhere in the world, the amount of noise produced by our airport is quite tolerable). The addition of some shopping, perhaps a cafe or two, increased public transportation service, and bike lanes for commuters would be important.

I believe that this area is a potentially lucrative one as far as building a mix of buildings, perhaps a la East Garrison in Salinas. However, one must remain cognizant of the fact that part of the proposed top-tier locations sits below Tehama Golf Course and other ‘pricey’ neighborhoods, which will require careful management. Garden Road is not too bad, but Highway 68 is very heavily traveled so access and egress, as well as parking and evacuation procedures are critical in this design.

In making this commute with my son going to school off of Hwy 68, I'd have to say, great space, yet the limitations of 68 are too great to support additional traffic.

No changes
Do not mix high density housing with single family home neighborhoods. This kind of development degrades the character and aesthetics of a single family home neighborhood in spite of what developers and City officials say.

Dense housing projects should only be developed on major corridors/streets.

This area is relatively isolated with minimal foot and bicycle traffic. The sidewalks would need to be updated to accommodate a higher population living on and using Garden Road. That said, I run along Garden Road frequently and I agree that it is a great untapped resource. Its relatively narrow and isolated location feels like it is best suited to mid-rise condos and townhouses. The area feels more "grown up" and "quiet" than apartment-style living in the downtown area, and I think it could be an inviting location for first-time buyers who are looking for something small (again, like a condo or townhouse or duplex/triplex) to call their own.

Same
This is not a good place for housing until 68 is expanded.

Need power and infrastructure improvements.

Security and safety services are lacking here. We need better ordinances so one can not trespass and loiter.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 153, Packet Page 284 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-108 Community Survey Report
In general, all housing areas should have green space and landscaping. Fore example, the photos proposed in this exercise show nice examples of landscaping with the single family homes on small lots and with the duplex example. The example of the townhomes is the least acceptable. I think all property types are fine. To me the most important issue is the green space associated with any property type. That is important for quality of life while living in these areas as well as the general cosmetic appeal of this beautiful area. Underground electrical utilities should also be considered with all new development moving forward.

As a rental resident in the area I personally would only consider living in a single family home. I do not like the noise that occurs with shared walls. It is also essential to have housing for people with pets. It is financially unfeasible for most working people to buy a home here. The rental market is sparse. It is even more difficult if a dog is part of your family. I pay twice as much in rent here as I did in Florida. My rental home here is very low quality. It is old and out-dated. Yet the properties are selling for 1.6 million. I am a healthcare professional with with a great salary. I can afford $4000/month. Yet, the housing available is very poor quality. I have family in the area and that is the ONLY reason that I stay here.

It is such a beautiful area. It is a shame that housing quality is not better. I do not think our vision for the area matters very much if people cannot afford to live here.

Thank you for the thoughtful investigation into the housing opportunities in Monterey.

I live directly adjacent to the area described here, and we should develop the heck out of this place. We are on a transportation corridor, and there is plenty of land available. MPUSD just had to close a school in this area due to lack of enrollment. Bring more housing! Lots along the Hwy 68 corridor are larger - incentivize ADUs here (preapproved plans, etc.). Build the Garden Rd. Project, and look for more opportunities. The land adjacent to Olmstead Rd isn’t in your development boundary - I assume it must be county land. Can Monterey annex it? I can attest to the fact that this area is minutes from downtown, as well as Seaside via the highway or Marina via General Jim Moore - it’s a GREAT location for medium density housing with parks and preserved open spaces. A direct path to Jacks Peak? BUILD IT.

Look at better utilizing this area and increasing the density of developments. Also, look at how to better utilize MPUSD school property. Can that old Foothill Elementary school campus be used for housing? Fantastic, people love hearing the sound of planes in the morning afternoon and night on their weekends Again, empty office buildings should be converted to apartments for employees parks with playgrounds. bathrooms and green space, side walks Airport traffic makes this area unhealthy and unsafe for residences. Office buildings, yes.

Single family homes on small lots or condos only on the south side of 68 with access off Olmstead. Garden Road infill with apartments and townhomes hopefully for airport or local business employees to minimize commutes.

Perfect site for more workforce housing. Easy access to all-mode travel corridors in all directions, close to many major employers, already on major public transit routes, close to major grocery stores and other resident-serving businesses. Some sites may even be suitable for development as small neighborhood parks/greenspace. what's not to like?
New residential buildings should be mixed-use with stores and restaurants incorporated into the design.

Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Ensure there are adequate alternative transportation options for residents to reduce the need for personal vehicle conveyance. Increase parking capacity of the airport. Ensure there are pathways to greenspaces nearby.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 154, Packet Page 285 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-109
I prefer utilizing infrastructure and redevelopment opportunity in the already built areas of the city as opposed to sprawling out into the undeveloped land south of Highway 68.

Re purposing the large parcels along Garden Road would provide for a fair amount of residential living space.

Commercial and office space on ground floor , residential space on the upper floor (2 story max height) Not enough transit infrastructure to support. Would only increase traffic Please build more housing! We need more housing of all types. AND WE NEED IT NOW! A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation and nearby shopping, commercial and public services This is a good area for development because traffic and parking impacts would be minimal.

Good area for many types of housing. Hwy 68 traffic and lack of close by resources (grocery, restaurants, entertainment) would be a concern.

I support building housing along Garden Road, but not along Highway 68.

I realize that the current mandates require that we identify and plan for future housing, but I do not do not truly support housing in this area as the traffic is already problematic, and I think some areas should be commercial and it seems that the proximity to the airport makes this a prime area for warehouses or parking yards for heavy equipment or fleets of vehicles.

This is a lower priority location for housing in my mind. It's not walkable to anywhere but the airport and the few businesses around. It's also LOUD. Noise and exhaust from airplane traffic could cause health problems and stress on residents, especially since this is place where we don't use A/C and windows are usually open.

Light-Industrial live-work studio spaces would be cool over here. I've heard people aren't allowed to live in the garage condos off 68 right now. That's dumb. Let the car enthusiasts live in their garage workshops. This would also be a good option for people with wood-working or metal-working businesses, or musicians who want to live where their practice space is. Some people need loud housing options. So why not provide that over the loud airport?
Of all the places people could pick to live in Monterey, this is probably the last place anyone would pick.

Building housing in this neighborhood would change the character of the area a lot. It's currently a business-park type vibe with very little character. The main road (HWY 68) has a very fast speed limit for a neighborhood and depending on the design of the neighborhood, substantially more crosswalks and possible reduced speed limit would be needed to develop the area. I don't know of many single family homes in the area which would make it a great opportunity for a big apartment/condo community. A better walking path/sidewalk would need to be built connecting to Fremont Street. I think existing rush hour traffic from nearby schools is already a major concern in this and nearby neighborhoods and substantial road work would be needed to improve this problem.

Traffic mitigation will be crucial.

This area should definitely include mixed use options, as there are no food/grocery options back there. All building and development should aim to retain the most trees and also add in a public park for the new residents of this area. Greenspaces are essential to well-being.

Noise mitigation will be important. Infrastructure to allow bike commuting both to downtown and Ryan Ranch would be useful.

Commercial office, business park, light industrial.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 155, Packet Page 286 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-110 Community Survey Report
Unfortunately this is one of the best parking areas for commercial trucks and live-in vehicles, so even though it would be a great area for multi-unit housing, there would have to be plenty of parking within the developments themselves
Six stories with grocery store and other commercial amenities, bike/ped path, and better transit service.

This is a beautiful area and would be good to put more homes.

All residents need to share in the pain where development might be appropriate. There is considerable fire danger, no support services and lack of transportation resources in this corridor which would make residents dependent on car travel for basic necessities like grocery stores. For limited mobility populations like seniors, it might be a good location for senior housing if the development included groceries, sundries, outdoor space for seniors to live in dignity.

Great job identifying this area for housing. This is a good opportunity to create dense housing projects - it's away from neighborhoods to avoid NIMBY opposition.
business, hotel, restaurant. Near airport
Despite the distance from the downtown area (stores, government buildings, offices), this region shows great potential for housing provided that greenspaces are created in addition to ensuring that access to transportation is easy to utilize as well.

This would be a good area to expand for building housing.The only thing that might be disruptive is aircraft noise when they take off over NPS.

This area strikes me as more commercial/industrial. Residential units in this area would be isolated.

Green belt community park/recreational area, designated pedestrian crosswalk with flashing street lights on Garden, sidewalk connecting Garden to Mark Thomas Drive, elevated pedestal/bicycle bridge from Olmstead over highway 68.

I think it should continue to be used as is. There are businesses and medical office buildings there already. I don't think residential housing would fit in very well at all. I was under the impression that there was going to be a new hotel built on the site of the old gym. Not much action there over the past few years. traffic concerns on Hwy 68 must be addressed
I don't really want any new housing in the area. People are leaving California for states that tax less and are more business friendly. If we don't let people come here illegally, then we may not need more housing in California.

Any new housing will have to be very carefully considered: the highway 68 corridor is already dangerously overcrowded leading to everyday near misses and actual collisions. Before housing is added in the Garden Road section, a very careful plan for how to handle the additional traffic must be made. At the very minimum, roundabouts should be constructed at Jocelyn Canyon, Olmstead Road, and Canyon del Rey.

This area is far enough from downtown and lighthouse to allow housing development without degrading the character of those areas. It also has room to accommodate increased traffic as long as parking is planned. This area could use more development of small community hubs with shops, restaurants, and common areas to support the new residents.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 156, Packet Page 287 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-111
All housing should be encouraged here, along with commercial/mixed-use areas to reduce vehicle trips.

Encourage corner markets and small convenience shops, along with entertainment options as this is more remote from the primary downtown and New Monterey areas.

Yes and No. I think putting housing on Garden Road is much better than on HWY 68. That area already has the building plots, infrastructure, etc. for building houses. The section on HWY 68 would mean putting in so many things to make it livable, like sewers, plumbing, wiring, etc.. Plus, that section HWY 68 is already so backed up during rush hour and having more housing units right off the highway would only make it more so. Also there will be a lot of pushback about taking out all of the trees and land that is currently open space. The land always, always floods during rains as it is down a hill. It is very pretty as open space right now instead of a bunch of houses.

Also there aren't very many amenities in the area. Anyone that lives there will have to have a car in order to get to any of the stores that are in Monterey or Seaside. I believe there are bus routes but none that are very frequent. It makes more sense to put the housing units somewhere that is closer to the things needed. Stores, schools, work, etc.

Not the most desirable with airport noise during the early morning or day. But could handle increases traffic & land available.

Highway 68 widened to 4 lanes from York south. Traffic circle Olmsted. Garden Road widened.

The majority of units in the city could be on Garden Road. Continue to develop the abandoned and overgrown properties.

This area would make the most sense to build. I suggest the type of housing that allows for more people would be the best, especially low-moderate income housing. Parking always should be taken into consideration.

Transitional area for high-volume tourists. Incentivize public transport with workplaces.

Garden Road - Ugh. Isn't that where the rundown motor homes sit? Improve walkability & encourage businesses to move to this area. It's underutilized & lacks an identity but it's a fabulous area with great parking! This seems like a great spot for housing. The office spaces that are here currently seem to be mostly vacant and those spaces could be much better utilized for housing. It's a beautiful part of our peninsula that seems to be underutilized.

Since this area is close to the airport, I would think that lower rise buildings will be mandated. Road access to this area is good though just as Ryan Ranch and former Ft. Ord.

Only place housing on Garden Road. Do not build along Highway 68.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 157, Packet Page 288 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-112 Community Survey Report

RYAN RANCH AREA
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Ryan Ranch is the sort of development that requires people to drive which is not part of a low carbon/climatefriendly future. Hwy 68 is too busy to realistically safely be used for bike commuters. Adding housing in Ryan Ranch likely just adds to the traffic problem. The only possible option in my my mind is housing directly tied with workers at existing commercial properties within Ryan Ranch which would allow for walking or bike transit to within Ryan Ranch. Even so such residents would be driving for groceries, getting kids to school, etc.

Workforce housing for Ryan Ranch tenants.

I just want to have the ability to own property near where I work one day. I worked really hard as a Marine and in graduate school after that, and am now an extremely rare case having been hired back to be a Korean language assistant professor at DLI as a civilian after being a DLI student myself around 10 years ago. And yet I have no hope of ever owning property in the area with a pay of about $83,000 a year. DLI Faculty are highly skilled, highly educated, extremely hard working professionals who do critically important work for this country and yet we by and large have to rent simply due to the location of the Presidio. And property managers can gouge as much rent as they want because they can rely on the federal government to increase our locality pay just enough to keep pace. pickleball courts 8-10 for the community...mainly medical and commercial Sidewalks would be important
Need to develop shops and services on Ryan ranch to support new residents there.

This development should remain as is -- totally commercial. Mixed use is not appropriate -- no city services are nearby, or too far away!
High density housing
I think there is a lot of potential here. It doesn't have a lot of walkability, and it is important to consider how the increased traffic would affect access to the large number of medical facilities in Ryan Ranch.

This could be a good area for more high density housing. The Ryan Ranch area is dominated by office buildings.

Cookie-cutter high density housing developments in this area wouldn't change the character of the area much.

This area already has larger buildings and would be ideal for mid-rise buildings and bigger/taller housing.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 158, Packet Page 289 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-113
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” This area already has larger buildings and would be ideal for mid-rise buildings and bigger/taller housing.

I would love to see single family homes, with town homes, ADUs and duplexes in the mix, with some community spaces like a community rec center or a park. It is such a beautiful area that is centrally located and could be a wonderful option for young families wanting to be in the area and not looking to be in a higher density downtown area.

Affordable housing. Bike lanes and regular buses for commuting to salinas.

This area should be maintained as is, Monterey needs an area where new business/industry which can create jobs can locate. This is the place.

See previous commenst
This area already looks so elitist…it’s beautiful but nothing looks affordable. Maybe some areas could be dedicated to lower income and another for medium income. It seems medium income families like mine are stuck in between with either no affordable rentals and don’t qualify for lower cost housing. This needs to be addressed! There seems to be so much potential for land development here with some space in between but I doubt any contractors would even consider this “middle class conundrum.” Add a Restaurant for those that work in are around RR
Add businesses below to serve workers and potential new residents if mixed use is built. Need restaurants, deli's, dry cleaning, convenience store/mini mart, small format grocery store, charging stations, etc. Add amenities like Stone Creek in Del Rey Oaks but in Ryan Ranch in Monterey.

A great area for higher density housing, as long as the immediate area also has a growth in commercial services. It is a relatively connected area so can support more housing without stressing the transit infrastructure, as long as more bus routes are added.

Yes to mixed housing for CSUMB students in mind. They might be close to the shopping center on 218 and 68. A nice park for them to exercise in would be perfect!
It seems to me there is great potential for small urban parks throughout this area. This would give a lunch destination to office workers who could use a walk and a bench where they could eat a sandwich. Preserving some green space in this underdeveloped are is a high priority.

Ryan Ranch might be a great place to develop for CSUMB student housing. This would include a shopping complex for groceries, drug store and pharmacy. Also, tennis courts, pickle ball courts and a dog park maybe. Not sure about the airport noise though, so that would be a factor to consider for any housing there.

There is is so much potential within these spaces. The solution for the State's housing requirements are in this area along with Fort Ord and Garden Road. This is the perfect opportunity for the city to create a beautiful, well planned neighborhood within the beautiful nature that Ryan Ranch still provides. Multiple types of housing that appeal to different people and economic levels that are tucked away within nature and have beautiful walking paths. No need for plazas and such here. Just nature. Re-landscape with only California native trees and plants and expand mass transit if necessary. So many people live in Monterey because of it's beautiful nature here. This is the neighborhood for that. It will be appreciated by so many people. This is your answer and I hope you plan it well with a Grand master plan for the area and stick to the nature theme. You will be proud of it.

This also is the answer so you do not drop a burden onto already heavily developed, densely populated, already established neighborhoods that will not absorb the state's requirements well without compromise. Do not waste this opportunity to do this well with the 3 remaining zones that are perfect for a beautiful, creative development.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 159, Packet Page 290 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-114 Community Survey Report
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Add parks
LIke the Garden Road area this area is also ideal for expanding and creating new neighborhoods for the City of Monterey. This will also take the burden of expansion off of the more dense areas such as in North Monterey.

Expanding mass transit and creating housing and neighborhoods within this spacious area would be a major asset for Monterey as it is difficult to find new housing in Monterey as most neighborhoods have been long established and built. I don't think you need plazas and live music. It is a beautiful area located in the heart of beautiful quiet nature. Trees and any landscaping to be added should be California native trees and plants to blend in and contribute to any that have to be removed for development. And that would also continue with the beautiful aesthetic that nature provides in this area. This could be lovely. If well thought out, the City could expand into underutilized areas for the necessary State requirements without burdening it's already full neighborhoods and create a lovely, quiet, nature inspired and very desirable new neighborhood with housing for all types of income.

Ryan Ranch is another candidate for creating a lush, walkable neighborhood full of various residential and mixeduse properties. The vast plots of underutilized parking and office spaces are an ugly waste of land.

Please utilize the vast space here for multi-story apts or condos that have restaurant/grocery/pharmacy businesses on the first floor so tenants do not have to drive to get necessities.

Higher density and many affordable units for Monterey area employees, especially low income.

Traffic could be an issue, considering development in this area would be car dependent.

I want the folks who work in the area to be able to live in the area.

Ryan Ranch should also be reserved for light industry use. Monterey sorley needs good paying jobs! Thank God we have an area with lots of land and room for development. Go for it! Business area
People who work at sites in Ryan Ranch could walk to work but public transportation is needed to counter parking and traffic issues.

Would benefit from some services such as a small grocer Given its central geographical location, we could focus on incentives to build essential worker housing and provide affordable financing.

I wouldn’t consider housing in this area which is right under the airport flight path. Just asking for problems. I work there and definitely could not live peacefully with that level of noise This is an area for businesses.

This has strong potential for mid-rise apartments and townhomes and a mix of housing and retail. Additionally, green space such as trails or parks should be included.

I support housing here simply because it's so desperately needed in Monterey, but it's far from the city center where I want to be. I do not desire to live here, between the medical centers and airport with heavily trafficked 68.

If more housing is built, please create a recreation path for walkers/cyclists to connect to downtown. We need 68 to be less trafficky for everyone's wellbeing.

Add more public transit for residents in Ryan Ranch & Garden Rd.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 160, Packet Page 291 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-115
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Putting homes near medical buildings makes sense as long as there are also other amenities- small market, coffee shop etc
Open green space would be needed for residents.

I was not aware of the soil issue, but this seems like a great area for development. The Ryan Ranch architecture for the medical offices, etc. all seem to be about 2-3 stories and many in fact look like apartments or condos from the outside. Housing embedded in the area could be seamless.

Improve all aspects of Active Transportation infrastructure, creating more protected and connected bike lane networks.

More housing right on Highway 68 - much rather new housing was built behind Ryan Ranch.

Mixed use properties with commercial on the first level and residential above would be helpful in this area. Ryan Ranch would benefit from more restaurants that people could enjoy before, between, and after doctor's appointments.

I think this is the up and coming area of Monterey. Beautiful, sunny, and close to everything, it’s a great option! I would even love to see homes with garages. Just no HOAs, please! They cost extra and make it hard to afford long term for working class teachers like me and my husband.

Any new housing in the area will improve it, whatever can be built should include plans for small restaurants, coffee shops parks, anything to make if more welcoming to homeowners.

Continue to develop larger medical facilities to allow independent doctors and dentists to move out of downtown converted older homes and into rental spaces at Ryan Ranch.

Ryan Ranch seems like an ideal location for developing considerable public-private partnerships for workforce housing!
Lots of space for a community with a more residential feel. Also has some road alternatives to 68. Build a small bedroom community with duplex and small single family. Maybe a few low rise apartment/ onto units as well. I'm thinking a mini version of something like Irvine, CA.

I think this is a good spot for new housing, but would need to have excellent public transit service and some retail amenities in the area to reduce the need for residents to drive everywhere.

Do not support developing open space, vacant land. Also do not support building near or in hazard areas (in this case high liquefaction zone).

ALL development going forward (homes/business/other) should be subject to a mandatory practice whereby the DEVELOPER of a project MUST plan and pay for infrastructure (roads, bridges, sidewalks, etc) to accommodate vehicle/foot/other traffic increase and needs a result of the project/development --- AND have the infrastructure built and in place AHEAD of the development, so no project can commence until the roads, etc., are in place ahead of development!!
Additionally, especially in areas near the rarity of open spaces in a city, such as this area near Ford Ord and Ryan Ranch, I STRONGLY feel if any development occurs, in addition to the infrastructure mandate suggested above, I believe open area parks/community gathering places/skate parks/playgrounds, etc should be incorporated into the design of whatever is developed in this area.

This is one of the best places to add housing, since it is commercially-zoned with ample parking.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 161, Packet Page 292 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-116 Community Survey Report
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Perfect area to develop mixed usage and types of housing. Already have a good amount of business, but now they need housing.

Look at multiple story apts, this area has water rights Monterey needs industrial and research areas of the City to diversify revenue to maintain services. Ryan Ranch has been identified as an area with such potential. If we do wind up zoning that area for housing though, please designate Garden road as industrial without a residential overlay.

If large new buildings are necessary, Ryan Ranch would be the best location.

Health risk
2nd priority
Second priority
There are so many health professionals that work in this area that commute from Salinas - like nurses, admin assistants, etc, if you create closer affordable housing they might be attracted to moving closer to work.

I don't have as many specifics about this area, but it seems like it would be good to have a small circulator bus to connect with 68 often.

As someone who works in this area, we need more food options. Some of our employees only have 30 minute lunches, which means they do not have time to travel to get lunch. The small shopping center on Canyon Del Ray and HWY 68 does not have enough parking, or commercial food businesses to support any growth in the Ryan Ranch area. I think we should also be selective on which business can enter Monterey county to ensure it would be beneficial to our community.

A limited number of town homes or apartments here could be possible. I do not support adding over 3,000 new housing units to Monterey given our traffic, parking and water limitations.

HEAVY commercial area with building/changes happening every day. This is not a place for any residential build.

You do need to change the CC&R's so that more food service/restaurants can be built for the employees working in Ryan Ranch. The family that owns Monarch Village will not open or sell to anyone so that there is food service available out there.

Maintain open space with future developemnt
Housing here should be planned to create a cozy community of units among trees, grasses, open spaces, parks, walking and bike paths, plazas and community gathering spots. Don't just create density from open space.

Balance the open with some housing, but Balance is key for happy humans.

I don't think this is a suitable area for housing.

The airplane noise is terrible in this area.
leave creek area alone
Keep offices due to airport flight route--- more parking and better planned lots. I find myself going in circles trying to find a way out of the parking
more businesses
It would be good to mix housing in with the existing land uses in Ryan Ranch.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 162, Packet Page 293 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-117
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” If we develop housing in this location, it would also be nice to have some small shops/corner stores/things that make living in a neighborhood convenient.

Less appealing to me just because it is far from much other than office space, but for those who work there I guess it would make more sense, or those who just want to be further away from the center of things. Perfect spot for lots of planned parks and playgrounds.

If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

I AM AGAINST A CONCENTRATION OF LOW INCOME HOUSING IN OUR CITY AND PROPOSE

INTEGRATION OF LOW INCOME INTO EXISTING BUSINESS AND/OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS NOT EXCEEDING A 20 PERCENT TRESHOLD.

I think this area can stay more business, the area does nedd more restaurants and places for the people taht work there. maybe nice restaurants for dinner aswell
Ryan Ranch is a business area, with medical facilities. I do not think this is an appropriate place to build housing.

It will further increase traffic on the 68 corridor.

For now Ryan Ranch is a semi industrial/ office area. This use seems to fit the area at this time.

Like to have a mix of housing and retail adjacent to Ryan ranch with an emphasis on easy pedestrian access and bicycle routes
This is office park area. I would hate to see more impact on the oak trees and local flora and fauna than has already been done. This doesn't seem like a good place for residential. No restaurants, no services, no community.

Putting housing about and/or integrated into business/commercial areas is my favorite way to add housing AND get rid of cars. Can easily add more green space and shops.

I would love to see underground parking options to free up space on the streets. Also, more retail spaces and open spaces to gather and socialize.

Mix of residential and shopping with public gathering places with adequate parking. Xeriscaped to save water.

Secured Parking
Why would anybody want to live in an ugly office park?
Prime location for in-fill housing development. Will need to add support (i.e. shopping, etc.) infrastructure to reduce traffic impacts.

Traffic is gonna start to suck out here.

This would be a great place to put housing particularly for people who work at Ryan Ranch.

Caveats:

1. There needs to be services here

2. There needs to be good public transportation and/or bike paths to move people around and get them to town

3. It's a great place for mixed housing -- can serve the medical community as well as the teachers, police etc. of Monterey

4. Parking and walking paths need to be put through the housing..

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 163, Packet Page 294 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-118 Community Survey Report
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Gated communities with amenities on site such as laundry, gym, pool and parks for children and pets to play.

Lighted pathways for walking. Small market or gas station.

This area is a business park and should NOT have residential dwelling units. Traffic is already a huge problem on Wilson Road to York Rd to Highway 68
Ryan Ranch should be the business hub of town but there are so many complexes that have sat empty for decades.

If businesses aren't taking them, convert them to small plots or complexes that allow people to get on to 68 and wherever they need to go.

I love Ryan Ranch, this is a great location for so many different types of people too! Especially for people who prefer to feel more "outdoors" rather than in town, since they are closer to larger parks like Garland Ranch. I imagine this is also a great place if you have a dog (which is hugely important in this area!) A community park of some kind, and some nice nature trails would be really nice here.

PARKING NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE. The city makes WAY TOO MUCH money off of residents getting tickets while at work or at home, or the parking garages. Its just ridiculous and greedy.

If new housing is to be built, we'll need strategies to manage parking in the neighborhood." However the design, be sure to preserve parks and open space character of this oak-wooded area for any residential and community uses.

I'd like to see a grocery store built in this area. It would be supported by Ryan Ranch residents as well as residents of Del Rey Oaks and residents living near Hwy 68.

To me, this area is not living up to its industrial / commercial potential and in some ways its sort of isolated location is an opportunity to develop new planned communities here. Because it is not a very walkable area, I would opt to create some housing for a demographic that is middle-income and uses cars, drawing away some of these residents out of the central Monterey area where cars are not necessary to get around. I especially think that there could be redevelopment of office buildings as fourplexes or townhomes to meet key housing needs considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on remote work / joint or co-working spaces.

I understand why housing in Ryan Ranch is logical in some ways- it is already highly developed and would not involve the removal of open space. Commercial development there and some infrastructure exists, yet more would need to be added to service new residential neighborhoods. In other words, it does not make sense to add housing without grocery stores and other essential services so that you don't have thousands more cars spilling onto highway 68 at all times of the day. That road is already woefully crowded. If Ryan Ranch is targeted for housing, it should be done as villages, with parks, and trails that connect neighborhoods.

A mix of homes and business to serve the residents would work well to support the businesses out there. Retail stores to serve the residence would be required.

Lots of space at RR. Wave your magic wand and just do it.

Another great location for dense housing supporting short commutes to businesses.

With the end of the airport runway so close, I feel this should be the lowest priority, complaints will follow purchases…..

See my observations about the Garden Rd. area--the same comments apply to this area, although since there is even more space, I would advocate lower density new construction (low rise apartments and condominiums), in addition to any possible conversion of existing structures which would presumably be higher density. Given the increasing number of people being employed by the expanding Montage empire, perhaps they could be enticed to Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 164, Packet Page 295 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-119
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” use some of their resources to contribute to the development of new housing at a cost level which the vast majority of their employees could actually afford. Lack of affordable housing I know is a major problem for their staff, and makes recruiting and keeping staff at Montage increasingly difficult at all levels except for the very highest.

This is a highly-commercial area, with many doctors’ offices, as well as a CHOMP annex. It appears to have as boundaries both Canyon Del Rey and Highway 68, both of which are heavily traveled. Many of the doctors’ offices are privately-owned, akin to condos. Hence, I would expect pushback from this group.

This seems like a reasonable option for space, yet there is no real neighborhood experience. Perhaps housing for Ohana staffing?
Do not mix high density housing with single family home - low density - neighborhoods. This kind of development degrades the character and aesthetics of a single family home neighborhood in spite of what developers and City officials say. High density housing projects should only be developed on major corridors/streets.

I embrace this out-of-the-box idea. It's an interesting idea and it could easily work (especially for people who have to commute). I wonder how well mixed-use construction would work here... perhaps lunch spots and/or cafes that cater to the business crowd would be a successful pairing with 2nd and 3rd floor residential units. With the advent of work-from-home, there might be a lot of opportunity for existing property owners to keep their business tenants on the ground floor and convert upper levels to residential space. Given that Ryan Ranch is remarkably isolated for people without a car, housing here should cater to a quiet, home-body demographic.

Same
Special survey team allocated to chop down old trees and or trim trees to avoid trees falling on houses, cars roads or power lines. Replace old trees with planting new trees. Re- seal the roads as they are cracking. Have special allocations for excess cars owned by homeowners instead of parking on roads which is not a good site to see.

Sure do whatever you want here. Tehema will love it
parks with playgrounds, bathrooms, green space
A main concern of added density in Ryan Ranch is Hwy 68 traffic. But except for airport noise, it’s a good opportunity for housing.

I would want to see speed controls with added residences. Already, cars drive too fast. Speed calming, speed bumps/humps would be needed; current buildings include many medical offices, and drivers need consideration.

Night-time lighting would be needed. Consider a stoplight at the intersection of Upper and Lower Ragsdale near the FedEx complex.

Housing would be best as rentals or condos for medical professionals or others working in the Ryan Ranch area.

This would decrease traffic on Highway 68 and other arteries. I often see Ryan Ranch employees walking in the area on their lunch breaks. They might also enjoy walking to work. Ask CHOMP and Montage and the other businesses there what they need.

I was previously employed at Ryan Ranch, and still need to travel there at least once per week.

Current office park generates thousands of completely unnecessary vehicle trips everyday, because there are NO basic services for the thousands of people who work there -- no restaurants, no mini-mart/take-out food service, no dry cleaner, no ATM, etc etc. And to make it worse, there isn't even a walk/bike path to the commercial development at the Canyon Del Rey intersection! So every lunch hour, everyone has to get in their car......

If you really can't add housing because of the airport safety, at least solve these glaring planning mistakes! If there Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 165, Packet Page 296 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-120 Community Survey Report
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” were rental housing available in the area, a lot of employees would gladly give up their commutes, and maybe some services/retail would follow. If there can't be housing, put in a walk/bike path and a shuttle service (for the mobility limited). I'm sure the city of Del Rey Oaks would love the extra sales tax revenue that Monterey doesn't seem to be interested in.

New residential buildings should be mixed-use with stores and restaurants incorporated into the design.

Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Ensure there are adequate alternative transportation options for residents to reduce the need for personal vehicle conveyance. IEnsure there are pathways to greenspaces nearby.

I think the area along Boundary road would provide for single family homes with optional ADU's. not enough public transit to support housing this far from city center.

Please allow for the building of more housing! We are in desperate need of more housing.

This area would be the perfect spot to provide workforce housing for those employed in the region, with accessible shopping and commercial spaces linked with pedestrian and biking pathways and convenient public transportation to other regions of the county.

This is an excellent area for additional housing. It would be good to also add a small market, gas station, restaurant, and other amenities for residents.

Seems like the perfect place for low density housing given the vibe of the area. Not many resources available without getting in a car.

I support housing on land that has already been developed and is under-utilized, but I don't support building properties that have not been developed. I also do not support any additional housing along the 68 corridor.

Noise and liquification risks are very concerning. Addressing those risks will increase housing construction costs.

Requiring only a small percentage of housing units in these high-risk zones to be affordable units may facilitate housing development without major corner cutting to keep costs down.

Multi-family and mixed-use housing would be most compatible with the official park type developments there now. The city will need to consider providing public park space, or requiring housing developments to incorporate outdoor spaces since there are no parks in this area. Improvements in sidewalks and bike lanes could encourage people who work in Ryan Ranch to live in the new developments. But serious considerations for transit connections and increased car traffic will need to be addressed before a lot of housing units are added.

This is another opportunity to live-work spaces, but no artists or craftsman would knowingly sign up to live in a liquefaction zone where their work could easily be destroyed in even a minor earthquake. I'd only recommend live-work studios on better soils.

In general I'm pro-high density housing but this neighborhood might be fine with single family homes, since it's already somewhat remote and has only vehicle access to businesses. I personally would not want to live in this area because it's extremely loud from the airport but I could see suburban families finding it pleasant.

Leave this area as zoned for industrial and business. Monterey needs the taxes generated here.

This is getting to be too far out of town. Any development is basically sprawl and residents will be driving everywhere.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 166, Packet Page 297 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-121
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Having housing in this area should be designed to accommodate those that work in Ryan Ranch in order to cut down on commuting. But there will have to be other types of development such as a grocery store, hardware store or these residents will be commutating to those facilities. Can this be a self-contained community? so much space here, I understand the airport clearance but this area would be ideal is there a way to re-route airport probably not but this area seems ideal for housing Office park, light industrial. Reserve park space.

Six stories and grocery store, lunch/dinner options, and other commercial amenities. Better transit service.

With the workforce at Ryan Ranch, adding housing may make sense for employees as well as CSU Monterey Bay students. There would be an impact on Highway 68 which is congested many times during the day.

Ryan Ranch should remain as is but maybe add more professional offices to this area. I would like to see a new hospital build somewhere there as they would be close for all those doctors who have to travel between CHOMP & SVMH. If any housing were to be built in this area then I would suggest it be for visiting doctors. nurses, etc... for a reasonable amount. Maybe build a Ronald McDonald House in this area when we have a team of doctors who are the best and they draw patients to this area. What is stopping us from being the next Stanford? We do not need all of these office mega developments. CHOMP has enough property, too. Build dense multifamily housing. This area is close to major arteries and highways. business park
business park, so buildings that support business
Build lots of housing here. So much unused space and it's a great area for those commuting w easy access to 68 and hwy 1.

This area is for business/commercial/industrial. Air traffic noise would be a big concern. Anyone living in this area would be isolated from the rest of the residential community. additional traffic on hwy 68 must be addressed
This area should continue to be used as it is now. There is already construction of additional office parks, etc., going on in Ryan Ranch that will further impact the traffic on 68. Additional traffic in this area will only add to the nightmare that is Highway 68 in the mornings and evenings. I am concerned for the safety of the young drivers at York School who have to negotiate this traffic every day. Already, 68 needs roundabouts desperately, and that's without additional traffic from construction of residential buildings. Let's work on adding roundabouts at Jocelyn Canyon, Olmstead Rd., Canyon del Rey, San Benancio, and Los Laureles Grade.

We’ll need parking for residents. We also need to make sure that the developments match the beauty of the area and don’t just choose the cheapest looking design. The aesthetics of the buildings need to match the area.

All housing should be encouraged here, in addition to multi-use buildings with commercial components, maintained open space areas, convenience stores, and corner markets with food options.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 167, Packet Page 298 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-122 Community Survey Report
Ryan Ranch Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area.

What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Has become a medical area with Montague buildings & other commercial, but could have residential housing.

Would need a market?
A town house and small single-family home planned neighborhood as seen on Reservation Road in Marina.

Including parks, restaurants, food stores, gas station, transit center etc.

Continue to concentrate light industrial and medical business in the area. Provide low impact owned and rental housing for workers in that area. Improve bus transportation circulating in the area to connect to regional transportation hubs locally.

This area can support more traffic. CITY PLANNING - develop a 30-year plan that includes real neighborhoods with parks, shopping, schools, & other infrastructure to keep people local. Don't overdo it, though. Keep the green space & moderate for fire / drought risk.

Because of the avigation easement issue, I think that lower rise residential development in this area is appropriate.

Ryan Ranch as well as the adjacent Ft. Ord lands are more viable than other areas of the City because of access to and from the Peninsula. Both of these areas should have closer shopping especially for food. Safeway in DRO is the closest and requires getting in a car. If this area and Ft. Ord held a critical mass of residents, then shopping would be more viable.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 168, Packet Page 299 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-123

FORT ORD AREA
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” This is open space that provides connectivity and additional habitat for animal and plant species, some of which are regionally rare. There is not great access to shops or work. I would put this area last for development and instead focus on greater density in developed areas of Monterey.

Build it so there’s a neighborhood center with some shops w/housing above and gathering places. Incorporate walking paths and parks. Don’t do traditional subdivisions where people drive into garages and don’t know their neighbors. Walking paths, parks. Make it dense, build up.

This would be a great opportunity to expand the Monterey community if well though out and done with intentionality. Transportation will have to be part of the planning (i.e., bike paths, MST route).

I just want to have the ability to own property near where I work one day. I worked really hard as a Marine and in graduate school after that, and am now an extremely rare case having been hired back to be a Korean language assistant professor at DLI as a civilian after being a DLI student myself around 10 years ago. And yet I have no hope of ever owning property in the area with a pay of about $83,000 a year. DLI Faculty are highly skilled, highly educated, extremely hard working professionals who do critically important work for this country and yet we by and large have to rent simply due to the location of the Presidio. And property managers can gouge as much rent as they want because they can rely on the federal government to increase our locality pay just enough to keep pace. single family homes with rec trails connecting with other community rec trails...community centers...plaza for community with community center with senior center to mix with early childhood center...pickleball courts...ball fields
Anything could work but sidewalk’s should be included.

Fort Ord is a gold mine of usable space. It’s entangled in a typical post military base use plan no doubt. This area could support a lot of residences and multi use. And it begs for improved public transportation. How about a light rail train?
This area needs to be considered with Ryan Ranch and Garden Road -- the area is in close proximity and currently lacks totally and city services and transportation connections! Needs public transit, plazas, basic amenities
Keep as open space since recreation and habitat protection are crucial in our area. The housing crisis is best addressed by in-fill, re-development, or reuse of areas that are already vacant or could be updated. Additionally, there are numerous protected plant and wildlife species that occupy this area or depend on it for breeding/foraging. Yes, a large chunk of interior Fort Ord is protected, but maintaining this border area as natural open space serves as an important buffer between the protected interior and developed perimeter.

If some level of development is on the horizon for this area, please make it a park or trail system that mutually benefits the community and sensitive natural resources. Plus it connects to Fort Ord National Monument, preserving the natural protection and landscape features. That approach follows precedent with our community's values.

I think this area would give a lot of people an opportunity to get more space (hopefully for less money).

Road system in/out of that zone will need to be improved/made safe for additional people living/commuting in that area. General Jim Moore and surrounding roads have become a freeway during commute hours and is already shows signs of overutilization.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 169, Packet Page 300 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-124 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” It's right next to Ryan Ranch, which is dominated by office buildings. This could be a good area for higher density housing. With the access to water credits, this area would be good for getting new housing developed quickly.

Good housing potential; accessible to bike routes and transit. Feels more like a residential neighborhood than a mixed use area.

Housing and shopping/grocery stores should be available along with improve infrastructure- traffic flow wtc Rental costs need to be controlled for people who are not wealthy. Instead of capping the total amount … cap rent based on the amount per square foot, something like $2-3/square foot of living space. A basic one bedroom - like 9 x 10 ft, full kitchen + a ¾ bath unit but with a full bedroom smaller, start docking the costs? The basic bathroom would be ¾ shower, toilet NOT in the shower, sink. Kitchen = full size oven/stove, full size fridge, sink. If the unit has 2 stove top burners instead of a full oven + stove or a tiny refrigerator, decrease the price based on the missing amenities.

I envision a well planned community that works with local environmental planning groups to ensure the oak land habitat is preserved where possible and environmental impacts are mitigated. I would love to see the housing grouped in spaces, surrounded by the open space. I think this could make the area very desirable as well.

Bike lanes and more buses for commuting to and from salinas. Road improvements to ease congestion Monterey needs areas where new job generators can locate. This area is too remote for housing without supporting services nearby.

This would seem to be natural for new residential areas. Airport noise, Laguna Seca traffic, public transportation, and access to stores need to be taken into consideration.

This area has so much potential for cute neighborhoods with smaller family homes and tiny homes! There is also space for apartment buildings which may tackle this “middle class” problem. What is important is affordability and not having only
military families be able to rent/buy in the area since there seems to be somewhat of a tendency to give them priority. The rest of us that don’t want to leave Monterey, but are going to be forced to leave, need a place too. As the only autism evaluator that is bicultural in this area, I can say with confidence we need to keep our professionals who aren’t rich in the area!! Affordability seems more a possibility in this area.

This area should be kept as is with respect to the nature already there.

Keep Fort Ord as open space. Add trails and parks. Concentrate growth on redevelopment, infill, or increased higher density to existing developed areas.

I would want to keep this area as nature only
Student housing.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 170, Packet Page 301 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-125
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” I prefer to keep Ft ord wild!!
An absolute yes for this area! This is the one! Of all of the areas in this survey you save the best for last!!! There is no need to even begin to burden the previously listed areas that are already developed. Adding a burden of more housing to those areas is borderline absurd when this could be the most beautiful new development of stunning homes surrounded by nature. This one along with Garden Road and Ryan Ranch are your solutions to the State's requirements for additional housing.

Imagine a brand new neighborhood with a variety of types of housing tucked into nature with beautiful walking paths and parks. Imagine continuing with only California native plants and trees to keep the beautiful nature going. This could be the BEST place to live in Monterey. Create a beautiful master plan with nature in mind and create multiple types of housing for various economic levels and expand mass transit to the outskirts of this beautiful neighborhood oasis of quiet and beautiful Monterey nature. THIS is why many people live here. Give this to them!!!!
This is untapped potential. People would love this and your requirements are met. Please try to see the big picture of this and not willy nilly add ridiculous burdens to the already full area. THIS if the future. People want nature.

People want new. People want quiet. People want low density. THIS IS YOUR SOLUTION. PLEASE.

Include parks/ recreation areas
Like the Garden Road and Ryan Ranch areas - this area is suitable for the expansion of housing that the State is requiring of the City. By developing into these areas you will be taking this burden off of the more densely populated areas that really cannot withstand more housing such as the neighborhoods in the North Fremont area.

This area, if well thought out, could sustain multiple types of housing with an expansion of mass transit. It also is quiet and beautiful with nature so take advantage of that and create a complimentary aesthetic in the designs and layouts. Keep it quiet and special - no need for a plaza etc. Not everything has to be city oriented. Many people live and move here because they love and crave nature and all it's beauty Let's create something beautiful that all could enjoy. Landscaping should be mandatory of California Native plants and trees to not only blend in with the nature that is there but to also mitigate any loss of like vegetation in the development process. This also could be a lovely, highly desirable neighborhood with a variety of housing and values in the homes to accommodate a variety of incomes.

Use this space to create a beautiful, walkable neighborhood full of residential, mixed-use, and park spaces.

Please expand all types of housing and open all avenues of commute.

This feels like the natural place to expand. But water is still a major concern as well as traffic issues. And limit or exclude vacation rentals. We need places for people to live!! Avoid urban sprawl, prioritize building housing in areas that are already developed I want the folks who work in the area to be able to live in the area.

Need to maintain this unique ecosystem of wildflowers and birds Any new housing in this area needs to also include green areas and walking paths for the residents to enjoy Fort Ord is a large area that can support all types of new housing. But again, efforts should be made to attract light industry to this area as jobs are much needed in the Monterey area.

Keep any development from blocking ocean view. Plenty of Land here. Go for it! Maintaining park and open space designation, wetland and riparian habitat, and landscape permeability for wildlife movement From Fort Ord National Monument across the 68 Highway Corridor. This wildlife corridor is Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 171, Packet Page 302 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-126 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” essential for maintaining landscape connectivity and supports plant and animal dispersal and genetic exchange between populations in Fort Ord National Monument, Jacks Peak, and the Santa Lucia Range. These properties also present some challenges to be developed for housing, including unavoidable impacts to rare and sensitive habitat. Some properties in this area, or potentially required improvements on adjacent lands, are subject to a triparty agreement between Del Rey Oaks, The City of Monterey, and Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District that limits allowable uses and improvements and highlights the importance of onsite stormwater retention for any future development. This area also has very low walkability and relatively low access to supportive services that healthy communities need, likely generating relatively high increases in VMT relative to other locations.

Area to expand. Spread them out. Present building are too close. Too congested! Lots of room but transportation is needed.

If the city can create its required housing units without spoiling this undeveloped land, it should. This is a resource that should be preserved for as long as possible. Maybe mid century when the sea level starts displacing Montereyans it would be worth reconsidering
It's my understanding that there isn't enough water in this area to support housing.

As this is green space, I'm not comfortable with developing it. It should be left as is.

Ft Ord National Monument gets over a million visitors a year, many entering thru gateways with no parking or restrooms. Cities should preserve the natural areas around the monument, and provide access with amenities.

Keep wild places wild
I prefer to protect this area for recreational usage and vegetation and wild animal protection. One of the reasons people love living here is that they enjoy time outdoors in nature. If we keep developing these large natural areas, we'll live to regret it.

I supported housing in all the other areas, but have concern about this area. Maybe I do not understand the area well enough, but my first impression is to keep Ford Ord as open space. I believe we need open space corridors connecting to all the other open space corridors for animal migration. Also, I think we would be adding to the already huge traffic issues along 68.

Leave as nature preserve. Clean up the munitions pollution and restore the land as a recreational space only.

Generally supportive of this idea but this does feel a bit like “let’s stick these people way out here away from the $$$”.

This area should be mixed use with plenty of off-street parking and shopping readily available. This will increase traffic on 68 and Jim Moore so that needs to be addressed - how do we get 68 to be 4 lanes wide anyway? Let's leave as much open space as possible, and not spread more into this area.

There’s so much room at Fort Ord. Good place for low income housing.

Fort Ord needs to be a park for recreation and open space.

I think this is one of the most exciting f areas for development, but the price of recently added properties is over a million. My husband and I are teachers who work in Watsonville and Salinas. Marina would be a great place for us to live and commute. However, we can’t afford living there, and HOAs do not work for us since we own two cars, which means one wouldn’t be garaged and most HOAs use a lottery system for street parking, which means it isn’t guaranteed. Speaking of, it would be a great asset to get some type of teacher assistance program for owning Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 172, Packet Page 303 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-127
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” homes. I know some exist, but they do t offer enough incentives. For us, the ideal situation would be to have a property with an ADU that we could rent out.

Don't like the idea of building on un-developed land. Re-purpose the existing housing first. Not familiar with this swathe of Fort Ord but if there are water credits, then this area is ripe, and probably can support some new homes.

Substantial housing, even if the water credits are potentially available, would result in greatly increased traffic along some of the main arteries of the Peninsula. Those would need to be addressed to make project here desirable. (It sounds like this area is not in or immediately adjacent to any former Fort Ord ammunition ranges or has already been cleared, right?)
Not sure but think this area should also be developed to help spread the burden of meeting the required number of units across the entire city.

Excellent public transit will be key here and some local retail amenities if feasible. I wouldn't be in favor of higher rise structures given the lack of tree cover and flat topography more generally.

If it's not already, I believe with ALL development going forward (homes/business/other), it should be a mandatory practice whereby the DEVELOPER of a project MUST plan and pay for infrastructure (roads, bridges, sidewalks, etc) to accommodate vehicle/foot/other traffic increase and needs a result of the project/development -- - AND have the infrastructure built and in place AHEAD of the development, so no project can commence until the roads, etc., are in place ahead of development!!
Additionally, especially in areas such as this beautiful open space in Ford Ord (which I prefer be kept without structures/development if possible), I STRONGLY feel if any development occurs, in addition to the infrastructure stated above, I believe open area parks/community gathering places/skate parks/etc should be incorporated into the design of the development.

This is a great place for additional housing because it is currently open space. But, please preserve ample area as open space. Also, it would be best if there were services available for residents - ie. grocery store, gas, maybe a small restaurant.

I don't have enough information to complete this question wisely. What is the environmental impact of developing this area? I love our wild areas and would prefer to keep as many of them intact as possible. Keep open spaces open. If this is already an impacted area and the water is available, the yes to development, but a fully planned out development with infrastructure to support both the residential and business side of things. probably the best opportunity for many units.

I would prefer to see industry and research at the former fort ord property. I'm aware housing is the most cost effective construction on that site, but long term but that may not be the best use for the long term fiscal health of the City. If the Fort Ord Property does become developed for housing, please designate the Garden Road area as Industrial without a residential overlay. Monterey needs some area of the City for income and revenue generation If large new buildings are necessary, Ft. Ord would be the best place (along with Ryan Ranch).

This would be a good place for new housing developments. But it NEEDS TO HAVE HARD METALS REMOVED. It also needs to have a new plan FOR THE TRAFFIC!! First priority
First priority
Top priority
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 173, Packet Page 304 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-128 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Since this is the far south side of Ft Ord, further from CSUMB and the Reservation Road housing area - this is a distinctly different zone. Like the Ryan Ranch and Airport zones, you could develop a nice community integrated into the nature of the area, with the hills and trees nearby, this could be a great place for kids.

Housing should be priority over new business.

Limited new homes could be built here. It should be limited due to the current congestion of traffic on HWY 68. I do not support adding 3,000 new houses in Monterey.

Great place to build additional housing! Would love to see community living, mix of housing and restaurants.

Support development in area as long as not visible from Highway 68 and sensitive resources are protected.

While we need additional housing, we also need open spaces. Creating higher density housing in already developed areas is a far better solution than continuing to cover open spaces with new developments. Fort Ord should be left undeveloped.

Housing in this area should be thoughtfully placed, and a street grid should be developed to better integrate this area with Ryan Ranch, Highway 68, Highway 218, and General Jim Moore Boulevard.

Too much airplane noise in this area for housing.
open space nature preserve wildlife corridor
more restaurants and businsess
Development in this area would be primarily auto orientated. Street and road improvements would be needed to better connect South Boundary Road to General Jim Moore. Connecting the FORTAG trail to Del Rey Oaks and Seaside for safe and comfortable bicycle and walking connections should be mandatory if this area is developed.

I believe there are better areas in Ft Ord that can be redeveloped for housing that have better access to shopping etc. This area along Boundry road is a bit isolated and may be better left as open space, though single family homes are needed and could go here. Boundry road needs a good shoulder for bike lanes or even better would be a separate parallel bike commuter lane linking N side of Ryan Ranch to General Jim blvd.

This area could use more restaurants in support of the workers. Seems a missed opportunity.

I'd like to see how this piece would interface with the plans that Seaside has for development in the Ord.

Most underutilized potential ever, start building now. Focus should also be on maintaining a balance with open space, field sports opportunities, playgrounds. Great potential for families. Build smaller homes with 3 bedrooms in addition to the larger 5 bed places.

If new homes are built in this area, they should be dog friendly and have a small, fenced yard. Finding a rental in Monterey that allows dogs and has a yard is extremely difficult.

This area should have a mix of housing and shops: working force affordable housing needs to be looked at thoughtfully. with a plaza for socializing, green spaces, listening to live music, and events.” - A community cafe style library hub- to encourage people to come out, and utilize that space, not just for signing out books, etc. Elderly can drop by and have a conversation with a high schooler for example. Built a library of the future, serving the needs of the community and the generation ones ahead. - We'll need strategies to manage parking in the neighborhood." - EV car ( Solar panel) charging stations are both added to residential housing and commercial structures. - Maximize the land space available, by going for more structures that will utilize the land to its maximum, respecting the Environmental hazards and such. Meaning, if in a lot a Mid rise 4-5 story complex can be built, this Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 174, Packet Page 305 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-129
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” should take precedence over building a 2-3 story on the same land. - Built with a strong future anticipating the needs of current and future generations - Grocery stores, pahramcy.

This area has great potential for growth in housing. I would like to see homes to accomodate extended families, house of 4-6bedrooms. to accomodate elder parents in homes.

This is an area with land that can sustain larger or multigenerational families or those people with pets. However, it will increase traffic congestion on Imjin Road.

Maintain beautiful open spaces and wildlife habitat. encourage walking paths bike paths and green space.

No services, no restaurants and it would destroy open space. Let's not take out more oak trees and natural habitat.

This is not a good place for residential development. It's office park central.

This area creates an entire new neighborhood. Focus on green buildings, mix of housing, entertainments and businesses to create a place that does not need cars.
more homes access to wokr and cheaper housing would be nice More affordable housing!!
Residential community comprised of high density multi family structures and SFR with common areas similar to East Garrison but more affordable.

Secured Access And Parking
I prefer to keep Fort Ord Wild
Seems this is a "necessary" expansion option. Do projects like this require cooperation with neighboring towns? With the projected sea level rise/ storm flooding it seems building inland would be best option. Are these projects being built with future technologies in mind? Solar panels/ building batteries for the inevitable PG&E failures? Rain capture? Mixed use here with small cafe/ convenient store options.

I don't think this is a good area for housing...it's not really close to anything. Maybe assisted living or skilled nursing? It's close to the CHOMP buildings at Ryan Ranch which could be convenient for eldercare facilities and residents that aren't necessarily "coming and going" much.

Great opportunity for adding housing. Will need to add support (i.e. shopping, etc.) infrastructure to minimize traffic impacts.

This would be a great spot for transient use.

This would be a great place to add housing, with a couple of caveats:

1. There needs to be services nearby

2. Transportation options for the residents

3. There needs to be a mix of housing options so it doesn't turn into a "project" or ghetto Dedicated community spaces for children and pets to gather and play. Well lit Walkways for safe walking. Retail and grocery stores, and businesses that cater to teens such as a photo studio, arcade, bowling alley or mini golf etc type place, restaurants, gas station, skate park, community parks for picnics (like toro park) play structures for climbing as well as water play areas for children to use in the hotter months.

Leave it open for public use as hiking/biking trails
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 175, Packet Page 306 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-130 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Build anything and everything here. Keep in mind, this is WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca's main entrance on race weekends as NIMBYs have killed off using 68 as an entrance. Any housing here should include a traffic plan with lights or roundabouts to keep things moving.

Great for huge apartment buildings, would be a great area to have a larger outdoor community space as well.

Maybe even a dog park and pool! I dont know the area too well, but 68 can get quite traffic-y, so making sure there are plenty of roads to get in/out of this complex during those times will be key to not creating chaos. Easy access to public transit too!
PARKING NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE. The city makes WAY TOO MUCH money off of residents getting tickets while at work or at home, or the parking garages. Its just ridiculous and greedy.

Attempt to retain as much pine-forested canopy as possible with any planned developments and open-space for residential/park/recreation use here.

This area has good potential for development as a neighborhood with mixed housing types and if water is available for 240 homes, it should be developed.

This is a very small strip of land, and with congestion on Canyon Del Rey we will need better traffic control It would be a mistake not to seize the opportunity to develop eco-conscious dense affordable housing in this vacant area with so much potential to meet our key housing needs. I believe to make this area well-developed would require the 240 units to be a variety of types of housing from apartments to duplexes, and even permanent transitional housing for those making the journey away from being unhoused. I'd also like to see a community resource center with a park that could bring together the diverse future residents and emphasize/require sustainable practices in this community (composting, recycling etc...) When new housing is built, it will be important to have strategies to connect these folks to reliable public transportation to access the commercial / other centers in Seaside/Sand City as well as to central Monterey.

It absolutely makes sense to add housing in Fort Ord, given the location, water and proximity to open space.

However, I would be vehemently opposed to single family homes there or anywhere in Monterey. We need to create density which means aparmtne complexes or fourplexes, townhomes and shared spaces. I would support very small single units that were designed in village clusters to encourage more communal neighborhoods, cultural exchange and shared spaces like gardens, parks and gathering spaces. Again, we need to also build grocery stores and other essential services into these neighborhoods to reduce the need for car travel between Monterey/Seaside/Marina and reduce traffic.

Low density housing would be suitable. Otherwise, too much traffic is created. We have soooo much traffic now, more housing will exacerbate traffic issues.

This area should become the new, new Monterey given all of its space and potential. This area should support the greatest number of families given the large number of schools in the area and access to shopping in Seaside and Monterey. It should support higher density owner occupied housing such as single family home and town homes.

Another bedroom community. Traffic is already bad here, but it makes sense to add more housing here. Especially if there was a connector to the safe parts of Fort Ord.

All forms of housing should be used here. Extreme sound proofing to mitigate airport noise would be necessary……
To me, this area provides the most flexibility as there are no current projects in the area. I believe we could put a mix of housing to 5 stories maximum. I suspect that there will be pushback from Pasadera residents if the buildings are too tall as their houses were sold on the basis of views. As well, building height should be limited as planes landing at the airport tend to begin their descents quite a ways out from the airport. Oftentimes, at Ryan Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 176, Packet Page 307 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-131
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Ranch, one can read the plane’s identifiers just by looking up. Both this area, as well as Ryan Ranch, would experience lots of noise
This would be a bit sad to see, though it has good access.

Whatever is built, I would prefer it to be QUALITY with an ecofriendly vision. It is heartbreaking to see these massive neighborhoods going up (Shea, East Garrison, etc.) with little regard to sustainability (solar, efficient, etc.).

The era of McMansions is over with growing concerns for climate change. Minimizing the number of apartment complexes is also preferred.

Lastly, would love to see ADU's supported in all neighborhoods as this creates more housing opportunities.

Would very much like to see great chunks of the former Fort Ord remain relatively wild. East Garrison, for instance, is too clearly an indicator that these housing projects are neither well-planned nor securely funded.

Do not mix high density housing with single family home neighborhoods. This kind of development degrades the character and aesthetics of an established single family home neighborhood in spite of what developers and City officials say. High density housing projects should only be developed on major corridors/streets.

The City of Monterey should be pushing back against the State - the governor and the legislature - for mandating these ridiculous housing requirements on a coastal city, such as Monterey, with the water and fire issues we deal with in our community. Monterey should follow Huntington Beach's lead and sue the State to regain local control of planning decisions. Any housing development that Monterey approves should fit the existing neighborhoods.

Monterey should not allow high density projects in single family home neighborhoods. Monterey is a very special place. It is a first class tourist destination for good reason. Let's keep it that way.

I have very mixed feelings about this. On one hand, if I look at this land development as an extension of Del Rey Oaks (even though Del Rey Oaks is an entirely different municipality), then I can accept it. If I look at this land development as an encroachment into the open-land that I adore and that makes me love living here, then I hate it. That said, water credits are water credits, we don't have many parcels so ready for development on the peninsula, and technically it isn't National Monument land. It's in the perpetually-sunny section of town, and it is peaceful (all good things). Objectively, this is a good location for people with cars who want standalone homes, duplexes/triplexes, and/or townhomes. If I had the opportunity to purchase property there, I would strongly consider it and just accept the fact that we can't protect every inch of open land (we can only do our best). I STRONGLY suggest building housing with a variety of square-footages, styles, and price-points here. If we're going to develop land from scratch, then mix-in some 2-bedroom townhomes or duplexes with the 4-bedroom freestanding homes. I YEARN for a 2-bedroom, 1-2 bathroom property on the peninsula. They are great for single adults, small families, and seniors... and you can fit many of them in a small footprint... likely making it easier to meet our required housing targets.

Same
Build the housing here.

Need better access from 218 and 68 for cars.

Grocery store needed here.

Create something that will bring lots of tax revenue for the City here.

Special survey team allocated to chop down old trees and or trim trees to avoid trees falling on houses, cars roads or power lines. Replace old trees with planting new trees. Re- seal the roads as they are cracking. Have special allocations for excess cars owned by homeowners instead of parking on roads which is not a good site to see.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 177, Packet Page 308 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-132 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Roads to be swept and cleaned thoroughly. If cars are not parked on road side it will be much easier for road cleaning
Whatever you want to do here
Simple, one bedroom apartment buildings should be built for low income employees ( homeless ) with frequent bus service available.

Monterey as well as the city of Salinas should invest in a fleet of small electric buses that should run every hour, giving incentives for employees to use them. And run big buses only when an established demand is there. It’s embarrassing for a city to watch these almost empty buses lumbering on lighthouse, day in day out. grocery store, parks with playgrounds, bathrooms green space The intersection with Hwy 68 where Laguna Seca golf course and York Rd all meet is a MESS now - so backed up at rush-hour that cars can’t enter Hwy 68. The Fort Ord area is a prime area for housing, especially an apartment building, but please take the heavy traffic on 68 into consideration.

Also, public transportation needed.

Mixed developments with apartments, small lot single family and townhomes, for purchase or rent with "club" type amenities for the community and open space in the hazard zone. Single family large homes are not the way of the future.

Am I correct in seeing only a sliver of available land? If so, that doesn't seem right as there are acres and acres of Ft. Ord land. Please don't build luxury single family homes like what's been done already. Those houses has almost zero set back or back yard and they sell for $800,000K + Dedicated bike lanes should be incorporated into city street planning. Utilize native plant landscaping. Install roundabout intersections rather than stop lights, and where not feasible incorporate international crosswalks where all vehicle traffic stops for pedestrians. Ensure there are adequate alternative transportation options for residents to reduce the need for personal vehicle conveyance. Ensure there are pathways to greenspaces nearby. probably the best spot but needs more public transit to/from city center - a Jazz D line that goes from CSUMB to Monterey Transit center?
Please allow for more housing! We are in desperate need of more housing! A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation and to shopping, commercial and public services. I believe Fort Ord and Garden Road corridor affords the best opportunities without impacting the city's historic resources.

A mixed-use, walkable community that promotes affordable family housing with easy access to public transportation, with development to include shopping opportunities This is the best place for new housing, provided that some amenities could be added, ie grocery store, gas station, restaurant, etc.

Most types of housing would work in this area. Public transportation and more infrastructure (grocery stores, restaurants, personal care, etc) should be brought in.

Definitely needs a mix of housing, shops, and community areas as it is pretty much a blank slate now.

This seems like a great place for new medium density housing. Single family and 2-4 unit multifamily buildings are very compatible within the same block. Allowing for a mix of housing types on each of the lots will prevent a cookie-cutter look like the other Ft. Ord housing developments. Providing small private yards for new houses Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 178, Packet Page 309 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-133
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” would be a big selling point to buyers and renters. Since this area is more isolated than other parts of Monterey, it would likely appeal to people who spend more time at home and want a quieter community.

Development of this area will need to consider adding public parks, ADA compliant sidewalks, bicycle routes, and transit connections...which means getting Del Rey Oaks to play along. Seriously, no more bike boulevards to nowhere - it's a waste of money. Increased traffic on 68 also needs to be considered. If there's hundreds of units of new housing added around the airport and Ft. Ord, making 68 a 4-lane highway from CA-1 to York Rd would likely be needed.

I didn't see my neighborhood, New Monterey, in this survey. I would like to add that free-standing ADUs and dividing existing 1 and 2 family houses into more units should be prioritized in New Monterey. Right now, the lack of available water credits is preventing homeowners from being able to provide more affordable rental units on their property. And when people build units without credits, and the city finds out, they are fined and we lose a housing unit. There needs to be a pathway to making existing non-compliant ADUs compliant without removing the unit. Making it possible for new water credits to be granted for ADUs and subdividing buildings is the fastest and easiest way to create more affordable housing in Monterey. It would also make homeownership more affordable as homeowners could generate rental income for their ADUs. Monterey needs to focus on the lowhanging fruit first when it comes to creating more housing.

Additionally, we don't need any more hotels in Monterey. There is plenty of hotel redevelopment opportunities in the area. Water credits need to be prioritized for housing for FULL-TIME RESIDENTS. New housing shouldn't be luxury units. We have enough of those already.

This would be a weird place to build housing because it's completely disconnected from the nearby neighborhoods and people drive extremely fast on Boundary Road and treat it like an extension of the highway. I also was under the impression Ford Ord property could not be developed due to toxic groundwater, but maybe this small area is not affected. Similar to Ryan Ranch, I would not want to live here because it's disconnected from the rest of Monterey and situated along what I consider an unsafe road, however, it might make for a decent suburban style development.

Should be the main area of focus for now. Still need water! This area should be retained as parkland, but more amenities like parking, trails, and benches should be added in.

It's too far away from services and any non-car based transport is hampered by the dangers of biking or walking along Hwy 218. This can be a mitigation bank for the other developments in the city that will undoubtedly cause some take of trees or habitat.

This area will have the same problems as Ryan Ranch - the need to have supporting businesses - groceries, hardware etc.
another area with a lot of potential. Need to have AFFORDABLE homes built and preferably rental housing so apartments or triplexes.

Plan and build to include adequate on street parking in addition to garage and driveway spaces. Dedicate park space for playgrounds not just to walk a dog.

Maintain a lot of mixed use area with green and community gathering space . Parking should be built into any new residential projects for residents. New housing should not be available to those looking for investment properties and/or 2nd/3rd/4th homes.

Again, affordable workforce and senior housing are most in need. A development with a community garden and outdoor spaces to congregate, and a walking loop would contribute to the health and well being of residents.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 179, Packet Page 310 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-134 Community Survey Report
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Six stories. Grocery store and other commercial amenities. Better transit service.

Fort Ord goes for miles and has the room to build hundreds of new homes of all types. YES! Of all the places on the peninsula I would start here.

Ask CSU Monterey Bay to pay a development fee since their students would benefit from affordable housing in the area. Also, would like to see a 1,000+ units of senior housing -- high rises with care and support built in that allows seniors to live in dignity.

Another great area for housing. I'll buy here if you build before I die. Nice and sunny. Just add some commercial/retail space and parks and it could be paradise.

It seems as though four-door it would be an ideal spot to have accessory living. But it would need several amenities for it to be viable, i.e. shopping center, gas stations, grocery stores, etc..

A mix of housing and access to shopping and transportation via the Dunes.

We need a mix of low income, student housing(apt's), townhouses and small lot single family dwellings. A good example is East Garrison. Ample parking is a must do. Local amenities like food shopping and housing/family support stores(i.e.: hardware stores, etc.)
May not be the most desirable area to live due to aircraft noises from the airport approach.

More affordable housing, denser housing
Mix of housing for all age groups and family size, grocery stores, schools, walking trails, central park for picnics, enough roads to help with flow of traffic, HOAs for each neighborhood to help keep the standards of the neighborhoods up to par. A neighborhood swimming pool and club house for neighbors to gather.

I'd love to see other parts of Fort Ord developed for housing, but this area would have the same negative impact on highway 68 and 218 traffic as construction in Ryan Ranch would have.

This is an excellent area to become a bedroom community. I envision the Fort Ord area to become a hub for small and medium scale industry. The retail businesses that spring up will make this zone a lively place to work, live and play.

All housing should be encouraged here, in addition to multi-use buildings with commercial components, maintained open space areas, convenience stores, and corner markets with food options.

Again a similar issue with the HWY 68 section. There will need to be a lot of infrastructure put in. Amenities as well. If anything is built there, hopefully it isn't huge, multiple-story buildings. There would also have to be consideration of the natural land around it. It would be such a shame to just bulldoze it all for cookie cutter homes that don't add anything to the landscape. Which I know isn't the main concern but it should be taken into account!
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 180, Packet Page 311 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-135
Fort Ord Area Question 3 (10-Minute Survey): “Describe your vision for the future of this area. What other activities, improvements, or amenities would you like to see here?...” Another area with possibilities, but with airport traffic noise, but where else is there any opportunities ? Could handle traffic. Has good existing roads into Monterey & Del Ray Oaks shopping areas. Might be the best area for adding housing to Monterey.
create planned neighborhood with townhouses and single family units on small lots with own stores.

Having open space with trails for hiking, biking, running and walking are very important to me. Fort Ord should remain open and more trails with access to those activities should be considered.

Maximum density housing development in smaller multi family rental and owned homes developed with the amenities of small communities with walkable services within the community. Plan a public transportation hub in the new community.

Keep it open - provide better parking & infrastructure, especially to reduce pedestrian & traffic accidents / deaths.

I'll start by saying that I have been supporting environmental causes for over 50 years and I've served on the board of directors of this area's leading land stewardship organization which is dedicated to the inclusive, diverse, equitable access to natural preserved open spaces. With that preface, this area of the former Ft Ord is sadlya very viable location for development of new housing. I say this because of access to roads and lack of impacts on existing residents. I think that such a development could be created in such a way that it is modern & low carbon footprint. It should also contain some conveniences such as grocery so that it would reduce trips.

Lets put lots of housing here.

In-Person Outreach and Submitted Comments
Maximize urban core density - Avail of reduced parking requirements (AB 2097) to match of exceed 88 du/acre maximum already available along Alvarado
Plan for more centralized parking garages to serve higher density Create streamlining process to clear CEQA/NEPA for projects that meet min density (20 du/acre) Prioritize projects that meet minimum density (20-45 du/acre) for permitting/entitlement Eliminate discretionary review for projects meeting minimum density and/or affordability levels (15% VLI/LI or 20-40% moderate with scaling incentives such as setback reductions or FAR increases) AHOs should include their own minimum densities and development guidelines that allow for easy (streamlined, ministerial) design and approval
Find a density level across urban sites that allows for at least 2/3 of RHNA to fit before using Ford Ord Plan for density along arterial routes that justifies increase public transit service Rather than just assigning sites at current zoned densities (30-45 du/acre depending on state density bonuses) create affordable housing overlays (AHOs)
Aim for only 1/3 RHNA (or less) on Fort Ord
Whatever must be on Fort Ord, ensure transit routes extend to serve out at 15-30 minute internals to minimize vehicle traffic
Ensure mixed use on Fort Ord so residents may both live and work Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 181, Packet Page 312 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-136 Community Survey Report
Who will build new housing? Private investors?
Too many high-brow investors reduced opportunity to own Salinas slender housing authority
“Where’s the water?
Looking forward to 2023 plan – important to protect tenants, builder’s remedy concerns Casanova Oak Knoll Rec Center, is it open?
North Fremont is goof for housing, but we need to consider parking More affordable housing needed
Housing is good, tents no good. Need water/infrastructure Less SFR (single-family residences), more condo, fourplexes, etc Need more affordable housing
Bike – rec – path I’d like the no motorized vehicles regulation enforced We need a way for everyone to have a chance to get affordable housing. Larger apartments could help house families. Another issue is parking, and it would help to have more Modify light Fix at junction of Pacific El Dorado and Martin. Light too sensitive to cross traffic. Sometimes more than you are impending flow
Convert unused commercial property to residential
Pacific/Munras/Cass should have a mix of shops and housing with a plaza for socializing and listening to live music
Build affordable apartments where they tore down 1940’s Fort Ord barricks Allow additional ADU units to be built on single-family home properties in Oak Grove neighborhoods If more housing, traffic considerations need to take place If new housing is built, we need strategies to manage parking in neighborhood I’d like to see a crosswalk and street trees added here Expand (make bigger) the Monterey Library. Gov. Newsom just gave millions to some libraries.

Safe bike routes along Fremont to More Thomas for example Safe pedestrian and bike paths. More connectivity for those who bike, walk More affordable Section 8 housing
Focus more on small housing units (apartments) than full-size houses. Also, infrastructure and the upholding of culture (historical landmarks, art) should take precedent over housing.

I would not build on new land. Build up Seaside along main boulevards (go up to 4 or 5 stories). Save open land! Don’t put houses near an existing airport. You will get noise complaints endlessly.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 182, Packet Page 313 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-137
Bike path in the middle of the road on North Fremont is a fail. We would have been better secured with a sidewalk uplift similar to Broadway in Seaside.

I think there should be a toy store at the mall
Monterey Train. In work again
A tiny permaculture community for sustainable and affordable living Housing creates infrastructure concerns. Where do the pipes go? Good use of land here (Ryan ranch)
Do not build on more open land
A better question is how dense do you want new housing to be. Affordable? Stop gentrification. We need affordable housing for everyone.

We need to think of the homeless too. It’s a big issue here. Housing and mental health We should make affordable, multi-use zoning a common thing here. Monterey has abandoned housing and walkable neighborhoods.

Please create housing that would be available for teachers. We have a shortage of teachers due to no affordable housing.

Don’t change the character of Downtown Monterey!!
Try not to harm plants or animals homes. They have feelings too! Do not build on more open land along Highway 68 or Fort Ord boundary. Protect open land! Agreed x 2! Agreed x 4!
You cannot add houses near an airport. People will complain about the noise all the time. See Santa Monica Airport.

Affordable housing should be close to public transit. So maybe public transit should be expanded as well. Agreed Command higher rents and sales prices??? My daughter and I are leaving Monday. Born and raised here and we cannot afford it
What type of pipeline?
…Toxic Waste, mostly toxic waste though
I just submitted the 10 minute housing survey, but I forgot to say that I feel Monterey needs a lot more public art displayed. We just returned from a trip to Oaxaca, Mexico, and were very impressed with the abundant murals ,statues, posters, giant puppets, music, etc. Many workshops were available, especially to youth, to develop their skills in various fields. The vibrant streets of Oaxaca were a real inspiration! REQUIRED TO BUILD 3,.654 HOUSING UNITS IN THE CITY OF MONTEREY.

NECESSARY WATER FOR THESE UNITS IS THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE.

MONTEREY IS A VERY UNIQUE COMMUNITY. NOT THE NORMAL CITY FOUND IN MANY PARTS OF AMERICA. A HIGH PRICED CITY.

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS: BUILD UNITS AT TWO SITES ON GARDEN ROAD. THE OLD RACQUETBALL LOCATION AND THE OLD TRIDENT PROPERTY.

Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 183, Packet Page 314 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
B-138 Community Survey Report

CHALLENGE MAYBE GETTING APPROVAL FOR THE FAA
ALL THE 25t000 ACERS IN FT. ORD. SOME STRUCTURES AND ALREADY BUILT BUT WOULD NEED REMODELING. HAVE THE STATE PAY FOR THE WORK.

TELL THE STATE AUTHORITIES TO TAKE A HIKE AND EXPLAIN TO THEM MONTEREY HAS NO LAND AVAILABLE.

HAVE OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS LOBBY THE DECISION MAKERS IN SACRAMENTO Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 184, Packet Page 315 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
Community Survey Report B-139

LIBRARY BOARDS
Attachment 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 185, Packet Page 316

MEMORANDUM
Monterey 2031
To: Christy Sabdo, Associate Planner, City of Monterey
From: Andrew Hill and Karen Chavez, Dyett & Bhatia
Re: Monterey 2031 – Preliminary Sites Inventory and Key Strategies Date: May 31, 2023 (revised June 7)
Dear Christy:

This memo presents a preliminary inventory of sites available for housing in Monterey and some key strategies for the Housing Element Update. The sites inventory is a core component of the Housing Element which demonstrates capacity for the production of sufficient new housing to meet the City’s RHNA obligations for the 2023-31 period. Amid the ongoing housing shortage in California, Monterey is required to plan for at least 3,654 new homes over the next 8 years to accommodate current and projected need.

The Housing Element is being updated as part of the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update project, a collaborative effort between the City and its residents to create a blueprint that will guide development, conservation, and investment in Monterey in the years to come. The inventory and strategies identified in this memo reflect extensive community input collected through a citywide survey conducted between March 1 and April 30, 2023 and through the community listening sessions held in December 2022.

This memo provides context for decision-maker meetings in June at which direction on the sites and key strategies for the Housing Element will be sought. It is organized to:
• Provide relevant background information regarding State guidance for site suitability and community input on locations and strategies for new housing; • Introduce several areas of the City with the greatest potential to accommodate new housing, an assessment of the capacity for new housing in each, based on State site suitability guidelines and potential strategies to facilitate development in the area; and
• Summarize the total potential housing capacity of the sites with implementation of the potential strategies in relation to Monterey’s RHNA allocation.

BACKGROUND
State law requires that a community identify an adequate number of sites to accommodate and facilitate production of the City’s regional share of housing. To determine whether the City has sufficient land to accommodate its share of regional housing needs for all income groups, the City must identify “adequate sites.” Land considered suitable for residential development includes the following:
• Vacant sites zoned for residential use.
• Vacant sites zoned for nonresidential use that allow residential development.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 186, Packet Page 317

MEMORANDUM
2 Monterey 2031
• Residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density (nonvacant sites, including underutilized sites). • Sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county • Sites zoned for nonresidential use that can be redeveloped for residential use and a program is included in the Housing Element to rezone the site to permit residential use within three years of adoption.

Further, State law stipulates criteria for the adequacy of sites included on the inventory, including that they be zoned to accommodate housing, have appropriate development standards, and be served by public facilities as needed to facilitate the development of a variety of housing products suitable for all income levels. Vacant sites included on prior inventories in two or more consecutive planning periods and non-vacant sites included on the prior period inventory cannot be carried forward to the current planning period to satisfy the need for housing affordable to lower income households unless they are rezoned to allow residential use by right at the default density for the jurisdiction, which in Monterey’s case is 20 dwelling units per acre.

Additionally, new guidance from the State requires that the projections for the realistic capacity of eligible sites be made on the basis of past performance in the jurisdiction or the surrounding region. Accordingly, a survey of recently constructed projects in Monterey and surrounding communities was conducted to establish average as-built densities that can be applied to determine the realistic capacity of sites included in the inventory. Although housing demand is high in the city, production has been severely constrained by water supply availability. Therefore, the survey also considered recent residential development projects on comparable sites in Seaside, Marina, and Sand City that do not face the same water supply constraints as Monterey so as to provide a realistic estimate of the future capacity of sites when water supply is available. Based on the results of the survey, the following densities have been used to project realistic capacity: 55 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) in the Alvarado District Downtown; 29 dwelling units per acre for non-vacant sites along commercial corridors; and 15.9 du/ac in the Pacific/Munras/Cass area, based on the average density of existing housing in the area. For vacant residential lots in low density neighborhoods, a typical rate of one unit per lot was assumed.

HOUSING POTENTIAL BY OPPORTUNITY AREA
Between March 1 and April 30, 2023, over 1,050 residents, business owners, and people working or attending school in Monterey participated in the Monterey 2031 Community Survey. The survey focused in particular on eight areas of Monterey with the greatest potential to accommodate new housing or other types of development in the coming years, and the questions were designed to solicit feedback that will help plan where new housing, employment, and shopping should be located and how to achieve other community objectives like improving transportation options, revitalizing older commercial streets, and preserving and enhancing neighborhood character. A survey report was prepared to document community input collected and present key implications for the planning process.

This section of the memo introduces the opportunity areas and their capacity for new housing, accounting for community input received and State guidance for site suitability. A description of development potential in each area and strategies to facilitate development ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 187, Packet Page 318

MEMORANDUM
3 Monterey 2031
are proposed, including changes to City policies and regulations. Maps depicting sites in each area that can potentially accommodate new housing are included at the end of this memo.

The maps present the opportunity sites ranked by viability for development with housing in consideration of the prevailing land use characteristics and hazards. Tier 1 sites are those with indicators that signal the strongest redevelopment potential, and which are also least encumbered by natural and humanmade hazards. Tier 5 sites are those with some indication of redevelopment potential, but which are constrained by hazards.

Downtown
Downtown Monterey is the city’s premier business and tourism district, featuring shopping, restaurants, office, hotels, banks, and some higher density housing. There are few vacant parcels, but there is strong potential for redevelopment of older, underutilized commercial properties that currently feature 1-story buildings and large alleys or surface parking lots.

The area south of Franklin Street between Alvarado and El Estero Park (known as the Pearl District) is projected to be impacted by sea level rise in 2050 and parts of this area are already subject to flooding during storms. The Downtown Specific Plan establishes a Density Cap Overlay which applies to much of the Pearl District, which limits building height to 4 stories for predominantly residential projects and caps permitted housing development at a maximum of 30 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) calculated on the basis of all sites included in the overlay with no limit for individual parcels.

In the recent citywide survey, respondents indicated the highest level of support for density and taller buildings downtown. A full 55 percent of respondents indicated that they believe low rise or mid-rise apartments and condominiums are appropriate housing type in this area of the city. Today, residential development at up to 100 du/ac is permitted in the Alvardo District and at up to 30 du/ac on other properties downtown. Recent development has been approved at above 50 du/ac in the area. Height limits vary by district, with up to four stories allowed in the downtown core (Alvarado District), three stories permitted in the East Village District, and generally two stories permitted in other areas (except the Pearl District as noted above). Parcel size tends to be small, less than 10,000 square feet on average, and the ownership pattern is somewhat fragmented, which poses challenges for development. The best development opportunities can be found in the Alvarado District, where there are several adjacent clusters of underutilized commercial properties along Calle Principal and Tyler that offer opportunities for redevelopment. The City Council has previously identified the Calle Principal Garage as a potential housing opportunity site, so redevelopment of this property has been assumed over the planning period. Given that the Pearl District is projected to be heavily impacted by sea level rise, no sites in this subarea have been included on the inventory.

Responding to community feedback and development opportunities, the following strategies are proposed to facilitate housing development downtown:
• Revise City land use and zoning regulations to permit building heights up to 55 feet (5 stories) in the Alvarado District to enhance development feasibility. (No change to permitted density or building heights in other parts of downtown). • Revise City policy and regulations to incorporate a clear statement that 100 percent residential projects are permitted throughout the downtown area, except on/adjacent to Alvarado Street per City Council resolution 21-129 C.S.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 188, Packet Page 319

MEMORANDUM
4 Monterey 2031
• Offer municipal shared parking agreements to projects that propose at least 30 new housing units within 1,000 feet of a City-owned parking lot or structure to assist with development feasibility and encourage lot consolidation.

On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 447 new housing units downtown, including 202 that would be affordable to households making less than 80 percent of the area median income. Sites are shown on Map 1.

North Fremont
The North Fremont corridor extends from Highway 68 to the eastern City limit north of the Fairgrounds. To the north and south are single-family residential neighborhoods. The airport approach zone extends over the western part of the corridor and higher density housing is prohibited here, which significantly constrains the potential to add housing over the area.

The approach zone ends just west of Airport Road, and along the eastern part of the corridor there are several vacant and underutilized properties. Existing development is primarily motels, restaurants, and strip retail center with large surface parking areas which represent opportunities for redevelopment.

High density residential uses (30 du/ac or more) are conditionally permitted on commercial properties along the corridor, although recent development has been approved at 42 du/ac.

Parcel size along North Fremont is larger than downtown or along Lighthouse Avenue, on average 0.77 acres or about 33,500 square feet. There are three adjacent larger parcels under common ownership at the east end of the corridor and several pairs of adjacent underutilized properties that could be consolidated to facilitate development. In the recent citywide survey, community members expressed strong support for housing along North Fremont, particularly apartments (low rise and mid-rise) and townhomes. Many respondents expressed support for reimagining the area as a walkable, mixed use corridor that provides attainable housing options together with retail, restaurants, and daily services.

To help facilitate this vision and integrate new housing along the eastern portion of the corridor, the following strategies are proposed:
• Revise City land use and zoning regulations to permit up to 45 du/ac on all properties fronting Fremont Street with no change to permitted building heights. • Revise City policy and regulations to incorporate a clear statement that 100 percent residential projects are permitted along the eastern segment of the North Fremont corridor.
• To further the community vision for the area, identify incentives that can be offered for mixed use projects with residential, retail, restaurants, or daily services.

On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 308 new housing units, including 198 that would be affordable to households making less than 80 percent of the area median income. Sites are shown on Map 2.

Lighthouse
This area encompasses Lighthouse Avenue, Foam Street, Wave Street and Cannery Row, roughly from Reeside Avenue to the City limit. Today, the area features a mix of neighborhood and visitor-oriented businesses interspersed with housing, including 2 and 3 ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 189, Packet Page 320 5 Monterey 2031

MEMORANDUM
story apartment buildings, duplexes, and single-family homes. Portions along the coast near Cannery Row are susceptible to flooding from sea level rise, but overall risk of environmental hazard is lower here than in other areas of Monterey. Particularly along Lighthouse Avenue and Foam Street, underutilized commercial properties with low slung buildings and larger surface parking lots represent opportunities for redevelopment.

There are substantially more underutilized commercial properties with potential for new housing in this area than along the North Fremont and Garden Road corridors, although parcel size tends to be smaller in this area, averaging under 9,500 square feet. High density residential uses (30 du/ac or more) are conditionally permitted on commercial properties along the corridor, and ground floor residential uses involving more than four units are conditionally permitted along Lighthouse Avenue. Clusters of underutilized parcels under common ownership on Lighthouse and Wave represent some of the best opportunities for redevelopment. There are also adjacent underutilized parcels that could be consolidated to facilitate redevelopment.

In the recent citywide survey, community members expressed support for housing in the area overall, but with less enthusiasm than for other areas of Monterey. More than 80 percent of 10-minute survey respondents and apartments and condominiums (mid and low rise) were the most preferred housing typology; however, 5-minute respondents tended to allocate a smaller portion of the total number of new units in the Lighthouse area. Survey respondents emphasized a desire for a walkable, mixed use environment with plazas and public spaces that provide opportunities for socializing and events. Survey respondents also highlighted the need to ensure that traffic, parking, and pollution are adequately addressed as new housing is incorporated over the area.

The following strategies are proposed to respond to community feedback and development opportunities in the Lighthouse area:
• Revise City policy and regulations to permit 100 percent residential projects on Lighthouse Avenue.
• Couple this change with incentives for mixed use projects with a retail/restaurant component in order to promote that desired character of the area while facilitating the development of new housing to support retail vitality. • Offer municipal shared parking agreements to projects that propose at least 20 new housing units within 1,000 feet of a City-owned parking lot or structure outside the coastal zone to assist with development feasibility and encourage lot consolidation.

On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 381 new housing units, including 96 that would be affordable to households making less than 80 percent of the area median income. Sites are shown on Map 3.

Garden Road
Garden Road is a 0.7-mile corridor that runs from the Monterey Pines Golf Club to Olmsted Road, between the Airport and Highway 68. The area features a mix of commercial and office development today, with notable uses that include the Monterey Herald, California State parks Monterey District offices, Caltrans District Office, Garden Place Professional Center, Shoreline Church, and the Comfort Inn. Existing development in the area consists of 1- and ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 190, Packet Page 321

MEMORANDUM
6 Monterey 2031
2-story buildings with surface parking heavily screened from view with trees and landscaping. Parcel size is relatively large, ranging from 0.9 acres to approximately 6 acres.

Parcels on the norther side of the corridor abut the airport to the north and are largely within Airport Safety Zone 3 (Inner Turning Zone), where residential development is generally prohibited.

The Multifamily Residential Overlay District applies to the corridor, allowing the conversion of existing buildings to housing or the development of new housing at up to 30 du/ac. Several development applications along the corridor are currently under review and one project involving 25 units on a 1.86-acre office site was approved in January 2023. Additional underutilized commercial/office properties along the southern side of the corridor present further opportunities for redevelopment with housing. In the recent citywide survey, there was solid (although not unanimous) support for additional high density housing along the corridor, including apartments and townhomes. Survey respondents emphasized the need to provide transit and bicycle connectivity to the rest of the community if housing is added here and to ensure adequate airport noise mitigation strategies are implemented.

The following strategies are proposed to respond to community feedback and development opportunities in the Garden Road area:

1. Increase the maximum permitted density in the Multifamily Residential Overlay District from 30 to 50 du/ac and consider establishing a minimum density for the area when adequate water supply becomes available.

2. To reduce development costs and enhance feasibility, revise the Multifamily Residential Overlay District regulations to remove the requirement for covered parking spaces where they can be adequately screened from view.

On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 415 new multifamily housing units, which would all be at densities deemed affordable for households making less than 80 percent of the area median income. Sites are shown on Map 4.

Additionally, another option available to increase the number of moderate and affordable income housing units in this area would involve redesignation and development of a large vacant parcel owned by the Monterey City School District. A notable number of survey respondents expressed support for the development of clustered housing on vacant hillside land south of the airport within the City limit. This could be accomplished by designating the 50-acre Monterey City School District parcel east of Tarpey Flats for housing development.

The Highway 68 Area Plan envisions a mix of up to 300 low and moderate income housing units on this property if the District declares the property surplus. The Highway 68 Area Plan provides policy direction and design guidelines that could serve as a starting point for planning of the site and surroundings. The City and the School District could also jointly pursue an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) to help fund the cost of infrastructure to support development of the site. For illustrative purposes, this strategy has been factored into the inventory. This site is shown on Map 8.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 191, Packet Page 322 7 Monterey 2031

MEMORANDUM
Pacific/Munras/Cass
This area features an eclectic mix of hotels, small-scale offices and apartments, and singlefamily homes. Some underutilized commercial and office properties along Pacific, Cass, Abrego, and Munras offer opportunities for housing within easy walking distance of downtown. The area has relatively low risk of environmental hazards. Current General Plan land use and zoning for the area is Commercial, which allows for development at up to 30 du/ac along Munras Avenue and the Pacific/El Dorado/Cass Street area. Parcel size varies, with larger parcels ranging from 0.25 acres to 0.9 acres on Muras and smaller, odd-shaped parcels on Cass, El Dorado and Davis Lane. Notably, there are several clusters of small, adjacent underutilized parcels under common ownership that may be redeveloped together.

In the recent citywide survey, respondents supported additional smaller scale apartments, condominiums, fourplexes, triplexes, duplexes residential development in this area with building heights and styles that reflect the existing character. The average density of existing housing in the area is 15.9 du/ac. On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 137 new housing units on underutilized sites in this area. Sites are shown on Map 5.

Del Monte
This commercial corridor runs east of Del Monte Lake to Highway 1, featuring storage and auto-oriented businesses with some large surface parking lots and undeveloped land that could represent opportunities for redevelopment. There is existing single and multifamily housing north of the corridor. Coastal bluffs shield the corridor from the ocean and the risk of environmental hazard in the area is relatively low.

Current General Plan land use and zoning for the area is Commercial, which allows for development at up to 30 du/ac. Parcel size varies, but is typically larger than in the Downtown, Lighthouse, and Pacific/Munras/Cass opportunity areas. Average parcel size is 0.81 acres, with three parcels over 1-acre in size and a 1.94-acre cluster of underutilized sites under common ownership offering some of the best opportunities for redevelopment.

In the recent citywide survey, community members expressed support for housing in the area overall, but with less enthusiasm than for other areas of Monterey. Those who supported housing expressed a preference for apartments, condominiums, and townhomes. On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 126 new housing units on underutilized sites in this area, all of which would be at densities deemed affordable for households making less than 80 percent of the area median income. Sites are shown on Map 6.

Ryan Ranch and Fort Ord
Located immediately southeast of the airport, the Ryan Ranch Area is home to Montage Health, an office park, and some light industrial businesses. New housing is prohibited in the airport approach zone which extends through the central part of the area, but there are several larger vacant and underutilized properties along Lower Ragsdale Drive which could represent opportunities for redevelopment. Immediately adjacent to the north is the former Fort Ord Military Base, where approximately 130 acres of vacant land is potentially available for development with housing and other uses. The Fort Ord area is largely outside of the airport safety zones and risk of environmental hazard is lower here than in other areas of
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 192, Packet Page 323

MEMORANDUM
8 Monterey 2031
Monterey. Ford Ord also has water credits sufficient for 240 new homes today, making it one of the more feasible locations for housing development in the near term, although the City has received correspondence from Land Watch about a settlement agreement applicable to the site that may affect development potential.

The General Plan land use designations applicable in this area include Industrial (I) and Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS). Current zoning does not permit housing in Ryan Ranch, but two of the six parcels at Fort Ord are zoned Planned Community (PC), which permits residential development subject to a PC Plan or Specific Plan.

In the recent Citywide survey, Fort Ord was the area respondents identified most favorably for new housing, and generally felt it would be appropriate for a mix of housing types, primarily including single-family homes and townhomes with some multifamily housing as well. Ryan Ranch was also ranked highly by survey respondents as a location for new housing, including a mix of apartments and townhomes. Community comments highlighted some of the challenges for development in this area, including the limited capacity of existing infrastructure and lack of access/connectivity to other areas of the community (particularly for transit, bicycles, and pedestrians). Preferences for the future of the area also varied, with many advocating for the creation of a mixed-use village over the area, others preferring to see lower scale development integrated with the natural environment, and some not favorable to development on natural open spaces or biologically sensitive areas.

Integrating new housing into this area would need to be done carefully and in a way that responds to the variety of preferences and concerns that community members expressed through the survey. Therefore, a key implementing strategy for the area would involve the preparation of a specific plan to establish a clear vision for the areas and to guide future development and conservation, identify infrastructure needs and financing mechanisms, and establish measures to ensure sustainable development and adequate resource protection.

On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes a total of 2,400 new housing units in the Ryan Ranch and Fort Ord area, 480 of which would be affordable to moderate-income and low-income households, consistent with the City’s inclusionary ordinance. Sites are shown on Map 7.

ADDITIONAL HOUSING POTENTIAL
Outside of the opportunity areas, there are other sites and strategies that can potentially contribute new housing to address community needs and help meet the City’s RHNA obligations. These are detailed below.

Vacant Residential Land
Map 8 shows the location of vacant residential parcels within the City limit. In total, there are 109 parcels designated Low Density Residential (LDR) in the General Plan and zoned R-1, as well as 20 vacant parcels designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) in the General Plan and zoned either R-2 or R-3. These sites are available for development and their capacity can be counted toward RHNA.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 193, Packet Page 324

MEMORANDUM
9 Monterey 2031
Pipeline Projects
According to HCD Guidance, projects that have been approved, permitted, or received a Certificate of Occupancy during the projection period (June 30, 2023 – December 15, 2031) can be counted toward the 2023-31 cycle RHNA. Table 1 details these pipeline projects and they are also shown on Map 9. In total there are projects that involve construction of 388 units, including 65 lower income units and 323 above moderate-income units.

Table 1: Pipeline Projects
Address APN(s) Project Description Project Status Site Size (acres)
Very Low,
Low, and
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Units
1230 Sixth St 001-844-002 New 1,600 sf
single-family
dwelling
Under
Construction

0.09 1 1
11 Portola
Avenue
013-025-025 New 1,578 sf
single-family
dwelling
Under
Construction

0.10 1 1
810 McClellan
Avenue
001-112-011 New 2,336 sf
single-family
dwelling
Under
Construction

0.14 1 1
200 Glenwood 001-771-013
Four-story, 40-unit
senior independent
living apartment
building
Under
Construction

10.1 0 40 40
601 Lighthouse
Avenue 001-066-007
Conversion of
existing building to
create four new
apartment units,
3,345 square feet
of retail space and
one 914 office
space
Under
Construction

0.14 4 4
537 Anthony St 001-712-010
Remodel-convert
611 sf of existing
warehouse into
residential
apartment
Under
Construction

0.09 1 1
457 Wave Street 001-026-003
Construct two new
three-story
buildings, totaling
four residential
condominium units
Under
Construction

0.13 4 4
2000 Garden
Road
013-312-008 Convert existing
commercial
building to multifamily building with
34 apartment units
Architectural
Review
Committee
(ARC)
preliminary
review 1.77 7 27 34
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 194, Packet Page 325

MEMORANDUM
10 Monterey 2031
Address APN(s) Project Description Project Status Site Size (acres)
Very Low,
Low, and
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Units
approved;
ARC final
review
pending
1015 Cass
Street
001-671-034 Convert existing
commercial office
space to seven
apartment units
Planning
permits
underway;
Has not
received
Building
Permits 0.41 2 5 7
600 Irving
Avenue
001-085-005 Planning permits
approved; Water
allocation pending
Construct an
addition to
existing
structure to
create five
new
residential
units 0.27 5 5
480 Cannery
Row
001-021-011,
001-021-020,
001-021-019,
001-021-018,
001-021-017,
001-021-015,
001-021-014,
001-021-013,
001-021-012,
001-021-010,
001-022-023,
001-022-024,
001-022-025,
001-022-026,
001-022-027,
001-022-028,
001-022-029,
001-022-030,
001-022-031,
001-022-032,
001-022-033,
001-022-035
Construct a
combination of
buildings to include
51 residential units,
87,362 square feet
of commercial use
30,000 square feet
of restaurant space,
and 8,408 square
feet of
coastal/community
use
Has not
received
Planning
permits;
Coastal
permit for
small-scale
desal denied

0.15 11 40 51
857 Cass Street
001-681-19 Convert existing
commercial space
to two apartment
units. The result
would be a mixeduse building.

Planning
permit
underway

0.16 2 2
2600 Garden
Road
013-322-013 Demolish existing
structure;
ARC
preliminary 3.35 12 45 57
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 195, Packet Page 326

MEMORANDUM
11 Monterey 2031
Address APN(s) Project Description Project Status Site Size (acres)
Very Low,
Low, and
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Units
Construct five
three-story multifamily buildings
with 57 apartment
units
review
approved;
ARC final
review
pending
2560 Garden
Road
013-322-014 Proposed remodel
of an existing
industrial-zoned
office building;
remodel to include
25 apartment units
Planning
permit
incomplete

1.86 5 20 25
2200 North
Fremont
013-171-014 Construct a threestory mixed-use
building with 40
apartment units
and 6,000 square
feet of commercial
space
Building
permit in
review

0.67 8 32 40
704 Foam Street
001-016-006 Demolish existing
structure;
Construct four
new stand-alone
residential units
with detached
garages
Planning
permits in
review;
Environmental
review
pending

0.13 4 4
1000 Eight
Street
001-851-005 Convert existing
commercial space
to two apartment
units. The result
would be a mixeduse building.

Planning
permit
approved;
Building
permit in
review 0.08 2 2
300 Cannery
Row
001-031-003 Conversion of
existing building to
create eight new
residential
condominium units
and 8,500 square
feet of retail &
Coastal
Commercial with
parking offsite.

Planning
permit
approved;
Currently in
review with
Coastal
Commission

0.05 8 8
2300 Garden
Road
013-312-004 Convert existing
office building into
64 apartment units
ARC
preliminary
review
approved;
ARC final
review
pending 6.79 13 51 64
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 196, Packet Page 327

MEMORANDUM
12 Monterey 2031
Address APN(s) Project Description Project Status Site Size (acres)
Very Low,
Low, and
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Units
449 Alvarado
Street
001-574-028 Demolish existing
structure;
Construct a fourstory mixed-use
building with 34
new apartment
units and 2,376
square feet of retail
space
EIR
preparation in
process; has
not received
Planning
permits

0.30 7 27 34
476 Tyler Street
001-574-029 Converting existing
ground floor
commercial space
within an existing
mixed-use building
into three studio
apartments
Planning
permits
approved; Has
not applied
for Building
permits

0.54 3 3
65 323 388
Source: City of Monterey, June 2023
Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory Dwelling Units can be built either as detached units on residential lots or incorporated into the primary structure. As such there is potential for ADUs in established neighborhoods throughout Monterey. Since they are typically smaller than a single-family home, ADUs and Junior ADUs can be “affordable by design,” meaning they cost less to build, buy, or rent. As such they can offer affordable opportunities for older adults living on fixed incomes, students, retail employees, and those working in the tourism sector, as well as for lower income households.

Safe harbors in State Housing Element law allow for the use of local trends since 2018 to project the future rate of ADU production. On average since 2018, the City has issued construction permits for 11 ADUs each year. By this measure, Monterey can project at least 11 ADUs annually throughout the planning period; however, as noted in HCD’s Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook, this methodology represents “a conservative option [that] only account[s] for the effect of the new laws without local promotional efforts or incentives.” In Monterey, past production trends have been constrained by water supply availability. With a suite of programs to incentivize and facilitate ADU production incorporated into the Draft Housing Element, the City could project more than 11 per year.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 197, Packet Page 328

MEMORANDUM
13 Monterey 2031
Table 2: Recent ADU Approvals
Year ADU Building Permits Issued
2018 7
2019 7
2020 13
2021 9
2022 19
Total 55
Annual Average 11
Projected 8-Year Development 88
Source: City of Monterey, Annual Progress Reports, 2018-2022

County Courthouse Site
The County has decided to relocate the courthouse and this 4.4-acre site, located on Aguajito Road, east of Highway 1, is potentially available to redevelopment with housing. Currently, the site is designated LDR in the General Plan and zoned R-1; but if the site is declared surplus, it could accommodate higher density housing to help meet the needs of moderate, low and very low-income households. Assuming it is rezoned to R-3, the site could accommodate 130 new units affordable to moderate, low, and very low income households.

Monterey Museum of Art Perry Lane Site
Located at 590 Perry Lane just a short walk from El Estero Park and downtown Monterey, this 1.82-acre site is potentially available for housing. The site is currently for sale. It contains some small single-story structures and is partially located within an area of high liquefaction risk, construction techniques are available to mitigate this risk. The site is currently zoned Commercial, which allows for residential development at up to 30 du/ac. On this basis, the preliminary inventory assumes development of 50 new housing units, 10 of which would be moderate and lower income households.

Elks Lodge Site
Monterey Elks Lodge is located at 150 Mar Vista Drive. The 3.75-acre site contains approximately 22,000 square feet of existing buildings constructed in 1963 and has large areas of surface parking lot that could be redeveloped with housing. The site is surrounded by existing multifamily developments including the 3-story Palo Verde Apartments immediately adjacent to the west. The site itself is generally outside of mapped areas of environmental hazard, although the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone extends to the opposite site of Mar Vista Drive, uphill from the graded and developed portion of the site.

The General Plan Land Use designation applicable to the site is Residential - Medium Density (MDR), which allows for 8 to 30 du/ac. Assuming the existing building and structures remain on the property and new housing is integrated onsite, the Elks Lodge property could accommodate 94 new units at a density deemed affordable to low and very low income households by the State.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 198, Packet Page 329

MEMORANDUM
14 Monterey 2031

SUMMARY OF RHNA CAPACITY
Table 3, below, summarizes the realistic capacity projected for the inventory with implementation of the proposed strategies. It accounts for development of vacant residential land, pipeline projects, ADU production, and development on individual sites in opportunity areas. Per State guidance, ADUs are not assigned to individual sites, but rather projected on a citywide basis. It has been assumed that they will be affordable to Moderate Income Households based on their smaller size that tends to make them affordable by design. Low and Very Low RHNA capacity has been attributed to sites that meet the suitability criteria outlined in State law, including parcel size, location, and zoning. Infill sites that do not meet the established suitability criteria are assumed to develop with market rate housing and that capacity has been assigned to above moderate income households. However, the City has adopted an Inclusionary Ordinance which requires that 20 percent of new units in projects of six or more units be affordable to moderate and low income households.

Therefore, 20 percent of the total above moderate infill development capacity has been reallocated to moderate, low, and very low income households.

Overall, the preliminary draft inventory demonstrates capacity meet RHNA obligations at all income levels with a buffer. The buffer is required to ensure that there is sufficient capacity to meet RHNA obligations at all times during the planning period, in the event that some sites on the inventory actually develop at lower densities than envisioned. As a rule of thumb, communities typically plan for a buffer of 10 percent for their RHNA at all income levels. By this metric, the buffer for above moderate housing is robust, but the buffer for moderate, low, and very low income RHNA is extremely thin.

A strategy to bolster the moderate, low, and very low income could involve developing a congregational overlay that would facilitate moderate and low income housing on properties owned by faith-based groups in Monterey should they be interested in pursuing that option.

Faith-based organizations could be natural partners for affordable housing. There are over 40 church sites in Monterey with vacant land or large surface parking lots that could accommodate new housing. Staff and the consultants are working to set up a focus group discussion with representatives of the faith-based community to gauge their interest in housing and understand from their perspective what the challenges might be and how the City could support them in developing housing on their properties should they wish to do so in the future.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 199, Packet Page 330

MEMORANDUM
15 Monterey 2031
Table 3: Summary of RHNA Capacity
Income Category Very Low, Low, and Moderate Above Moderate Opportunity Area Vacant Non-vacant Vacant Non-vacant Subtotal Downtown 0 202 245 447
North Fremont 0 198 24 86 308
Garden Road 0 415 0 0 415
Lighthouse 0 96 12 273 381
Pacific/Munras/Cass 0 0 0 137 137
Del Monte 0 126 0 0 126
Fort Ord/Ryan Ranch 480 1,920 2,400
Vacant Low Density Residential 113 113
Vacant High Density Residential 33 33
ADUs 88 88
Pipeline projects 65 323 388
County Courthouse Site 130 130
50-acre MCSD Site 300 300
590 Perry Lane Site 50 50
Elk's Lodge Site 94
Subtotal 98 2,129 472 2,711 5,316
Total by RHNA Category 2,227 3,183 5,410
Inclusionary Requirement (20%) 188
Adjusted Total RHNA 2,415 2,995 5,410
RHNA 2,408 1,246 3,654
Buffer 7 1,749 1,498

0.29% 140.37%
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 200, Packet Page 331

MEMORANDUM
16 Monterey 2031

DISCUSSION
The preliminary inventory and key strategies are an important first step in the preparation of the Draft Housing Element. They build on an analysis of site suitability and reflect the extensive community input received to date through the Monterey 2031 process. The purpose of the June 13 Planning Commission meeting is to review preliminary inventory and key strategies and received feedback with a view to refining them. With direction on the sites and strategies, a full public review Draft Housing Element can then be prepared and released for community comment. Community feedback will then be presented to decision-makers in August and the Draft Housing Element may be revised accordingly at that time.

In particular, staff and the consultant would like to hear from the Planning Commission on the following questions on June 13:
• Are the sites and strategies proposed appropriate to include in the Draft Housing Element?
• Are there other sites that should be added?
• Should the City develop programs to incentivize and facilitate ADU production beyond the annual rate of 11 ADUs per year that has been seen since 2018.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 201, Packet Page 332 Jacks
Ballpark
P a c i f i c O c e a n
El Estero
Park
St Johns
Cemetery
Monterey State
Beach
Iris
Canyon
Park
Friendly
Plaza
Colton Hall
Lawn
Lagunita
Mirada
Stevenson
Adobe
Larkin St
Van Buren St
Watson St
Figueroa St
Calle Principal
Tyler St
Del Monte Ave
E Franklin St
Alvarado St
Pierce St
Municipal
Wharf 2
Polk St
Hartnell St
Alma St
Cooper St
Washington St
Bonifacio Pl
Anthony St
Dutra St
Major Sherman Ln
Perry Ln
Adams St
Eldorado St
Davis Ln
Lomita St
Robinson St
O
Franklin St
C
Cortes St
Union St
Jackson St
Dormody Ct
Sargent Ct
Del Monte Ave
Portola Plz
Van Buren
E Franklin St
E Franklin St
Camino Aguajito
Cortes St
Madison St
Tyler St
Cortes St
Larkin St
Jefferson St
Lighthouse Ave
Munras Ave
Abrego St
Fremont St
Church St
Pacific St
Pacific St
Cass St
Cass St
Munras Ave
Webster St
Pearl St Pearl St
Calle Principal
Webster St
Camino El Estero
Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
Downtown Opportunity Area
National Historic
Landmark District
Density Cap Overlay
City of Monterey
Water
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Map 1: Downtown
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 202, Packet Page 333 N Fremont St
Hannon Ave
Dela Vina Ave
Montecito Ave
Ramona Ave
Montecito Ave
Casanova Ave
Ramona Ave
Airport Rd
Airport Rd
Casa Verde Ave
Del Monte Ave
Peter
Ferrante
Park
Montecito
Park
Casanova
Oak Knoll
Park
Laguna
Grande
Regional
Park
Recreation
Trail
A§
AÔ Casanova Ave
Ramona Ave
N Fremont St
Hannon Ave
Del Monte Ave
Encina Ave
Bruce Ln
Grant Ave
Virgin Ave
Branner Ave
Fairground Rd
Lerwick Dr
Beach Way
Spray Ave
Palo Verde Ave
Dunecrest Ave
Dundee Dr
Helvic Ave
Littleness Ave
Garden Ave
Surf Way
Casa Verde Ave
Garden Dr
Portola Ave
Old Salinas Hwy
Kolb Ave
Alcalde Ave
Sequoia Ave
Del Rosa Ave
Roberts Ave
Toyon Ave
English Ave
Stuart Ave
Ivy St
Lilac St
Fern St
Bush St
Oxner St
Estrella Ave
Fremont Blvd
Dunecrest Ln
del Robles Ave
Dela Vina Ave
Garden Rd
Ramona Ave
Fairground Rd
Palo Verde Ave
English Ave
7 2
3 1 3 4
5 Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
North Fremont Opportunity Area
Airport Safety Zones
City of Monterey
Water
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
#
Map 2: North Fremont
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 203, Packet Page 334 Ryan Ranch
Community
Park
Fisherman's Flat
Greenbelt
Monterey
Regional
Airport
A§
A§
A»
Garden Rd
Via Isola
S Boundary Rd
rD tseroF reeD
Airport Rd Euclid Ave Casanova Ave
Elk Run
Fawn Ln
Ralston Dr
Monhollan Rd
Olmsted Rd
Via Marettimo
Marsala Cir
rD krapykS
San Vito Cir
White Tail Ln
Trapani
Cir
Ivy St
Stag Ln
Lilac St
Messina Pl
Garden Rd
Garden Rd
Sphere of Influence
7 7
5 1
3 1
2 3
3 3
5 2
2 4
2 1
5 Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
Garden Road/Airport/Hwy 68 Opportunity Area
Airport Safety Zones
City of Monterey
Sphere of Influence
Water
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Map 3: Garden Road Airport Highway 68
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 204, Packet Page 335 Recreation
Trail
Oak
Newton
Park
San Carlos
Beach Park
Archer Park
Mcabee
Beach
Scholze
Park
Hoffman
Park
Work
Triangle
Cannery Row
Park Plaza
Bruce Ariss
Way Park
Ed
Ricketts
Park
P a c i f i c O c e a n
Pacific Grove
Foam St
Laine St
Belden St
Pine St
Archer St
Spencer St
Wave St
Hoffman Ave
Irving Ave
Hawthorne St
Drake Ave
Lighthouse Ave
Oak St
Prescott Ave
McClelland Ave
Line St
Dickman Ave
Reeside Ave
David Ave
Newton St
Lily St
McClellan Ave
Central Ave
Prescott Ave
David Ave
David Ave
McClellan Ave
Irving Ave
Cannery Row
Drake Ave
Wave St
Cannery Row
Lighthouse Ave
Foam St
Hawthorne St
Hawthorne S
Hoffman Ave
Pine St
Oak St
Spencer St
Archer St
Belden St
Belden St
Laine St
Laine St
Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
Lighthouse Opportunity Area
City of Monterey
Water
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Map 4: Lighthouse
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 205, Packet Page 336 El Estero Park
St Johns
Cemetery
Iris
Canyon
Park
Colton Hall
Lawn
Lagunita
Mirada
Jacobsen
Park
so
Whispering
Pines
Park
Don
Dahvee
Park
Pacific
Street
Greenbelt
Pacific St
Colton St
Grove St
Bernabe Dr
Doud St
Madison St
Polk St
Camino El Estero
Hartnell St
Alma St
Fountain Ave
Larkin St
Figueroa St
Major Sherman Ln
Perry Ln
Eldorado St
Davis Ln
Van Buren St
El Camino
Lomita St
Robinson St
Cortes St
Avenue Maria Rd
Del Rey
Tyler St
Via Descanso
Carmelo St
Carmelito Ave
Via Esperanza
Calle Principal
ncina
Via Arboles
El Caminito
Via Robles
Via Campana
Dormody Ct
Monterey Cir
Sargent Ct
Fremont St
Munras Ave
Abrego St
Munras Ave
Munras Ave
Pacific St
Abrego St
Cortes St
Via Mirada
Mesa Rd
El Dorado St
Alta Mesa Rd
Pacific St
Munras Ave
Cass St
Webster St
Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
Pacific/Munras/Cass Opportunity Area
City of Monterey
Water
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Map 5: Pacific/Munras/Cass
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 206, Packet Page 337 Monterey
State Beach
Del Monte
Beach
P a c i f i c O c e a n
AÔ
AÔ
Montecito
Park
Laguna
Grande
Regional
Park
US Navy
Beachfront
Hannon Ave
Virgin St
English Ave
Ramona Ave
Virgin Ave
Casanova Ave
Spray Ave
Casa Verde Way
Encina Ave
Dunecrest Ave
Grant Ave
Branner Ave
Palo Verde Ave
Helvic Ave
Tide Ave
Casa Verde Way
Portola Ave
Sea Foam Ave
Roberts Ave
Toyon Ave
Del Robles Ave
Dela Vina Ave
Encina Ave
Ramona Ave
Dela Vina Ave
Beach Way
Surf Way
Casanova Ave
Hannon Ave
Ramona Ave
Encina Ave
Montecito Ave
Montecito Ave
Del Monte Ave
Del Monte Ave
Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Del Monte Opportunity Area
City of Monterey
Water
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Map 6: Del Monte
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 207, Packet Page 338 Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Fort Ord
National
Monument
S Boundary Rd
dR kroY
Ragsdale Dr
Harris Ct
Ryan Ranch Rd
Monterra Ranch Rd
Justin Ct
A§
»A
Wilson
Rd
Lower Ragsdale Dr
Upper Ragsdale Dr
7 2
4 3
3 1
2 5
5 Potential Opportunity Sites
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Pipeline Projects
Fort Ord/Ryan Ranch Opportunity Area
Airport Safety Zones
City of Monterey
Water
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Map 7: Fort Ord/Ryan Ranch
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 208, Packet Page 339 A§
A»
AÔ
A§
AÔ
A§
A§
AÔ
P a c i f i c O c e a n
Monterey
Regional
Airport
150 Mar Vista
Drive
Carmel
By-The-Sea
Sand
City
Seaside
Pacific Grove
Del Rey Oaks
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
Harbor
Courthouse
Site
590 Perry
Lane
W Franklin St Tyler St
Prescott Ave
Fairground Rd
Ragsdale D r
Abrego St
Cam
Aguaji to
Casa Verde Way
N Fremont St
Montecito Ave
Garden Rd
El Dorado St
Mark Thomas Dr
Upper Ragsdale Dr
Fremont St
Glenwood Cir
Sc en icDr
Lighthouse Ave
Aguajito Rd
Munras Ave
Pacific St
Mar Vista
Del Monte Ave
S Boundary Rd
SkylineDr
Jacks
Ballpark
Oak Newton
Park
Hilltop Park
And Center
Via Paraiso
Park
Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Quarry
Park
U.S. Navy
Beachfront
San Carlos
Beach Park
Soldier Field
Larkin
School Park
Veterans
Memorial Park Huckleberry Hill
Nature Preserve
Don Dahvee
Park Iris Canyon
Park
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
State Beach
Fisherman's
Flat Greenbelt
El Estero
Park
Old Capitol
Site
Monterey
City Hall
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Presidio of
Monterey
Presidio of
Monterey
0 ¼ ½ 1
Miles
J:\GISData\584 Monterey GP\GIS\Projects\Zoom Ins\Map 8_Citywide Sites.mxd Citywide Vacant Sites
Other Opportunity Sites
Opportunity Areas
City of Monterey
Sphere of Influence
Parks and Recreation
Water
Fairgrounds
Map 8: Sites Outside Opportunity Areas
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 209, Packet Page 340 A§
A»
AÔ
A§
AÔ
A§
A§
AÔ
P a c i f i c O c e a n
Monterey
Regional
Airport
Carmel
By-The-Sea
Sand
City
Seaside
Pacific Grove
Del Rey Oaks
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
Harbor
Jacks
Ballpark
Oak Newton Park Hilltop Park And Center
Via
Paraiso
Park
Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Quarry
Park
U.S. Navy
Beachfront
San Carlos
Beach Park
Soldier
Field
Larkin School Park
Veterans
Memorial Park Huckleberry
Hill Nature
Preserve
Don Dahvee Park
Iris
Canyon
Park
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
State Beach
Fisherman's
Flat Greenbelt
El Estero
Park
Old Capitol Site
Oak Newton
Park
Via Paraiso
Park
Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Quarry Park
U.S. Navy
Beachfront
San Carlos Beach Park
Soldier Field
Veterans Memorial Park
Huckleberry Hill
Nature Preserve
Don Dahvee
Park
Iris Canyon
Park
Del Monte Beach
Monterey
State Beach
Fisherman's Flat Greenbelt
El Estero
Park
Old Capitol
Site
Monterey
City Hall
W Franklin St Tyler St
Prescott Ave
Fairground Rd
Ragsdale D r
Abrego St
Cam
Aguaji to
Casa Verde Way
N Fremont St
Montecito Ave
Garden Rd
El Dorado St
Mark Thomas Dr
Upper Ragsdale Dr
Fremont St
Glenwood Cir
Sc en icDr
Lighthouse Ave
Aguajito Rd
Munras Ave
Pacific St
Mar Vista Dr Del Monte Ave
S Boundary Rd
SkylineDr
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Presidio of
Monterey
Presidio of
Monterey
0 ¼ ½ 1
Miles
J:\GISData\584 Monterey GP\GIS\Projects\Zoom Ins\Map 9_Pipeline Projects.mxd Pipeline Projects
(Residential or Mixed Use)
Opportunity Areas
City of Monterey
Sphere of Influence
Parks and Recreation
Water
Fairgrounds
Map 9: Pipeline Projects
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 210, Packet Page 341 A§
A»
AÔ
A§
AÔ
A§
A§
AÔ
P a c i f i c O c e a n
Monterey
Regional
Airport
Carmel
By-The-Sea
Sand
City
Seaside
Pacific Grove
Del Rey Oaks
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
Harbor
Jacks
Ballpark
Oak Newton Park Hilltop Park
And Center
Via
Paraiso
Park
Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Quarry
Park
U.S. Navy
Beachfront
San Carlos
Beach Park
Soldier
Field
Larkin School Park
Veterans
Memorial Park Huckleberry
Hill Nature
Preserve
Don Dahvee Park
Iris
Canyon
Park
Del Monte
Beach
Monterey
State Beach
Fisherman's
Flat Greenbelt
El Estero
Park
Old Capitol Site
W Franklin St Tyler St
Prescott Ave
Fairground Rd
Ragsdale D r
Abrego St
Cam
Aguaji to
Casa Verde Way
N Fremont St
Montecito Ave
Garden Rd
El Dorado St
Mark Thomas Dr
Upper Ragsdale Dr
Fremont St
Glenwood Cir
Sc en icDr
Lighthouse Ave
Aguajito Rd
Munras Ave
Pacific St
Mar Vista
Del Monte Ave
S Boundary Rd
SkylineDr
Oak Newton
Park
Via Paraiso
Park
Ryan Ranch
Community Park
Quarry Park
U.S. Navy
Beachfront
San Carlos Beach Park
Soldier Field
Veterans
Memorial Park
Huckleberry Hill
Nature Preserve
Don Dahvee
Park
Iris Canyon
Park
Del Monte Beach
Monterey
State Beach
Fisherman's Flat Greenbelt
El Estero
Park
Old Capitol
Site
Monterey
City Hall
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Naval
Postgraduate
School
Presidio of
Monterey
Presidio of
Monterey
0 ¼ ½ 1
Miles
J:\GISData\584 Monterey GP\GIS\Projects\Zoom Ins\Map 10_Preliminary Housing Inventory Sites.mxd Sites available for Housing
Above Moderate Income
Very Low/Low/Moderate Income
Mixed Income
Opportunity Areas
City of Monterey
Sphere of Influence
Parks and Recreation
Water
Fairgrounds
Map 10: Preliminary Housing Sites Inventory
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 11., Item Page 211, Packet Page 342 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Christy Sabdo, AICP, Associate Planner, Planning Division SUBJECT: Select Preliminary Housing Opportunity Sites and Strategies to Facilitate Production of the City’s Regional Share of Housing for the Draft Monterey 2031 General Plan Update (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council discuss and select preliminary housing opportunity sites to be included in the draft Housing Element.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Support efforts and policies that provide equitable access to affordable housing in Monterey and the region.

Protect and preserve our natural environment by addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

State law requires cities to periodically update their Housing Element. The draft Housing Element must include an inventory of sites for future housing development.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the Date: 6/20/2023
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 343 environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

An Environmental Impact Report will be prepared on the draft Housing Element.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council can suggest other sites to include as housing opportunity sites.

DISCUSSION:

The Planning Commission and City Council jointly received a presentation on the community survey report results and housing opportunity sites. The City Council should discuss and select preliminary housing opportunity sites to facilitate the production of the City’s regional share of housing. This information will assist Staff with the preparation of the Draft Housing Element.

Community input will be received on the Draft Housing Element, and it will thereafter be presented to the City Council for consideration.

KC/sb
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/20/2023, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 344

Monterey City CouncilJune 20, 2023

Monterey City Council
June 20, 2023