Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Monterey City Council
July 16, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
July 16, 2024
Body
Monterey City Council
Pages
222
Original file
190.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on isearchmonterey.org. That file is the official record.

Council Chamber
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California
City Council Agenda
Council Regular Meeting
Amended Agenda
Tuesday, July 16, 2024
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
City Council
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Kim Barber, Councilmember,
District 1
Gino Garcia, Councilmember
Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember,
District 2
City Manager
Hans Uslar
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
 Written comment: Members of the public may submit comment(s) to [email protected] until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These messages are not read aloud during the meeting but are made available to the meeting body and public at https://monterey.gov/submitted-comments. All comments received become part of the record.
 In-Person: Please see the meeting location listed above. Wearing a mask is recommended and encouraged.
 Remote via ZoomGov Webinar:
o Join on a computer or smartphone: https://montereyorg.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 An up-to-date version of the Zoom software must be used.
o Or join by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (Campbell, CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another.  Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 #
 If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
 To “raise your hand,” dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute o Need help using or updating Zoom? Read our Zoom Meeting Instructions (PDF)  This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90-second delay).

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. Items pulled from the consent agenda – 15 minutes each item b. Public Appearance items – 30 minutes each item
c. Public Hearing items – 30 minutes each item
d. Closed session items – 15 minutes each item
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is 7/16/2024 4:00:00 PM
2 required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.
***Afternoon Session Agenda ***
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognize July as Parks and Recreation Month 2024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Approval of Minutes

2. May 29, 2024 Special Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)

3. June 18, 2024 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Award of Construction Contracts

4. Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $1,528,360.00 to ASG Builders for the Citywide Signalized Intersection ADA Upgrades, Phase 3A (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***CIP***

5. Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $529,925 to Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4 (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***Measure P/S*** Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

6. Adopt Resolution Certifying Compliance with State Law with Respect to Levying Assessments and Special Taxes; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the County of Monterey for the Collection of Assessments, Taxes, and Fees (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
7/16/2024 4:00:00 PM
3 7. Authorize an Appropriation from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance in the amount of $250,000 to the Sidewalk Repair Program (“Project”) and Approve an Amendment to the Job Order Contract with Precision Emprise, LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Projects by Increasing the Contract Funding Limit from $500,000 to $750,000 (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)

8. Authorize the City Manager to Enter Into a Memorandum of Understanding with Central Coast Overdose Prevention for Naloxone (NARCAN®) Distribution Boxes (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

9. Award Two Citywide Fuel Reduction Job Order Contracts 2024 in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. (Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 25, 2022)

10. Approve Participation in the Nationwide Opioid Litigation Settlement with Kroger and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Participation and Subdivision Agreements, and Request Direct Payments to the City (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Other

11. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: Wharf II North Pump House; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Jennifer Towsley (Monterey Fish Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Assignment of Lease (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
*** End of Consent Agenda ***

PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearings are held to receive a staff presentation and public comment on certain items prior to City Council action. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009.)

12. Amend Engineer's Report and Confirm Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 Area and the Reduced Assessment Proposed in the Amended Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

13. Amend Engineer's Report and Confirm Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-1 Area and the Reduced Assessment Proposed in the Amended Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

14. Open a Public Hearing to Receive Protests Related to the Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the Property Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Approve the Annual Rate Report of Sewer Charges for FY 2024-25, and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Collection of FY 2024-25 Sewer Charges on the Tax Roll if a Majority Protest Does Not Exist (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
7/16/2024 4:00:00 PM
4 *** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** The City Council will take public comments on closed session items before convening to closed session.

RECESS

RECONVENE
*** Evening Session Agenda ***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED
Any person who did not offer a general public comment in the afternoon session may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION

ADJOURN TO JOINT SPECIAL MEETING AND ESTABLISH QUORUM OF THE

PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commissioners: Mike Dawson, Chair; Robert Bluth, Vice Chair; Mike Brassfield; Daniel Fletcher; Sandra Freeman; Terry Latasa; and Peter Silva

PUBLIC HEARING (EVE)
Public Hearings are held to receive a staff presentation and public comment on certain items prior to City Council action. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009.)

15. I. Planning Commission Adopt a Resolution Recommending that the City Council:

A. Certify the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update in accordance with CEQA Article 7, Section 15090;
B. Adopt Environmental Findings, Statement of Overriding Consideration, and Mitigation and Monitoring Program; and
C. Approve the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update to the Housing (2023-2031), Land Use, Circulation, and Safety Elements
II. City Council Consider Planning Commission Recommendation and Adopt Resolutions to:

A. Certify the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update in accordance with CEQA Article 7, Section 15090;
B. Adopt Environmental Findings, Statement of Overriding Consideration, and Mitigation and Monitoring Program; and
C. Approve the Monterey 2031 General Plan Update to the Housing (2023-2031), Land Use, Circulation, and Safety Elements
Note: The Elements Contain Revised Land Use Designations which will Lead to Future Rezoning and Will Affect Individual Property Owners

ADJOURN TO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
7/16/2024 4:00:00 PM
5 PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

16. Adopt a Resolution Adding Charter Amendments to the Ballot to Ask the Voters of the City of Monterey to (1) Make Clerical and Technical Updates; (2) Specify Starting and Ending Dates for Terms of Office for the Mayor and City Council; (3) Impose 12-year Term Limits; and (4) Authorize Leases of Real Property Nonprofit Organizations, Governmental Entities, or Educational Institutions on Terms and Rates that Serve Community Benefit (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

ADJOURNMENT
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.gov/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours.

Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. Members of the public who submit written public comment on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $250 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:

Voicemail: (831) 646-3799 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.monterey.gov INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings. Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance. Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or (831) 646-3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-

35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communicationrelated assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

Upcoming city meetings are listed at http://isearchmonterey.org More information is available by calling (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Recognize July as Parks and Recreation Month 2024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council recognize the month of July as Parks and Recreation Month in the City of Monterey and celebrate the value of parks and recreation in our community.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is within the City Council’s purview to acknowledge the people and services delivered by the City of Monterey by recognizing the contributions of its workforce. Parks and Recreation Month 2024 is an appropriate recognition by the City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to recognize the month of July as Parks and Recreation Month in the City of Monterey.

Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 DISCUSSION:

For Parks and Recreation Month, many states, provinces, cities/towns, and municipalities from across the nation come together to celebrate with official government proclamations in honor of the contributions Parks and Recreation make to their communities.

For nearly 40 years, the nation has celebrated Park and Recreation Month in July to promote building strong, vibrant, and resilient communities through the power of parks and recreation.

This month is dedicated to recognizing and celebrating the more than 160,000 full-time park and recreation professionals, along with hundreds of thousands of part-time and seasonal workers and volunteers who maintain our country’s local, state, and community parks nationwide.

Parks and Recreation Month encourages everyone to reflect on the exponential value parks and recreation professionals bring to communities. This year's theme is “Where You Belong,” which celebrates the many ways park and recreation professionals across the country foster a sense of belonging in their communities by providing welcoming and inclusive programs, essential services for all ages and abilities, and safe, accessible spaces to build meaningful connections.

The City of Monterey Parks and Recreation Department provides spaces, programs, and services that are essential to the area’s vitality. It serves as a key factor in advancing health equity, improving individual and community-level health outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.

Thousands of people of all ages enjoy the City’s multitude of parks, ballfields, disc golf course, sports courts (tennis, pickleball, and basketball), playgrounds, beach areas, a dog park, recreation trail, a skate park and campground, as well as a diverse assortment of programs and services at the community centers and the Sports Center.

The services that park and recreation professionals provide are vital to our communities, from protecting open spaces and natural resources, to helping promote mental and physical health by providing activities and resources for all people, to participating in disaster relief with Forestry emergency response and temporary assistance centers. Park and Recreation Month encourages everyone to reflect on the exponential value parks and recreation professionals bring to communities.
“Where You Belong” is truly indicative of the Monterey community spirit! The leadership of the City Council, the interest and oversight of our Parks and Recreation Commission, the dedication of City employees, and the support of the community have created a model City recreation and parks program that is recognized across the State. Parks and Recreation professionals strengthen community identity as well as foster inclusion and belonging within the City of Monterey. Let’s celebrate their contributions, as well as their enthusiasm and commitment during Parks and Recreation Month.

An oral report will be presented at the meeting.

KL
Attachments: 1. Proclamation
e: Parks and Recreation Commission
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 7 Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 8 Office of the Mayor
Monterey, California 93940
Proclamation declaring
Tytler Williamson
July 2024 as Parks and Recreation Month
WHEREAS, the Monterey City Council recognizes and proclaims the month of July 2024 as Parks and Recreation Month throughout the City of Monterey; and,
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is an integral part of communities throughout this country, including the City of Monterey with 37 parks, a beautiful campground, historic cemetery, coastal recreation trail, outdoor fields and courts, the award-winning Monterey Sports Center, and four community centers; and, WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation encourages physical activity, promotes active lifestyles, improves the physical and mental health of people, and enables people to connect with one another through programs offered at local parks, community centers, and the Monterey Sports Center such as tennis, pickleball, volleyball, soccer, swimming group exercise, Pilates, dance, gymnastics, and more; and, .• WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation promotes time spent in nature, which positively impacts mental health by increasing cognitive performance and well-being, and alleviating illnesses such as depression, attention deficit disorders, and Altheimer' s; and,
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is a leading provider of healthy meals, nutrition services, and education with holiday food distribution events, weekly meal and fresh produce distribution for senior citizens, and healthy eating workshops for children; and,
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation programming and education activities in the City of Monterey are critical to childhood development, such as out of school. time programming with specialty camps and programs, and environmental education at Camp Quien Sabe and Whispering Pines Day Camp; and, WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation increases the community's economic prosperity through in.creased property value, the attraction and retention of businesses, and crime reduction; and, WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is fundamental to environmental well-being of our community and essential and adaptable infrastructure with temporary assistance centers that makes the Monterey community resilient in the face of natural disasters and climate change; and,
WHEREAS, the City's parks and natural recreation areas ensure.the ecological preservation and beauty of our community and provide a place for children and adults to connect with nature and recreate outdoors; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT I, Tyller Williamson Mayor of the City of Monterey, on behalf of the City Council and citizens, do hereby recognize the month of July 2024 as Parks and Recreation Month in the City of Monterey.

Dated: July 16, 2024
Tyller Williamson, Mayor

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 9

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Wednesday, May 29, 2024
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST., MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
AND TELECONFERENCE LOCATION: THE COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT, EL TORO MEETING ROOM, 18610 MADRONE PARKWAY, MORGAN HILL, CA 95037 Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith*, Williamson

Absent: None
*Attended remotely by teleconference pursuant to Gov. Code sec. 54953(b)
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Fire Chief, Parks and Recreation Director, Human Resources Director, Library & Museums Director, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Parks Operations Manager, Public Works Administrative Services Manager, Fleet Manager, Harbormaster, Senior Administrative Analyst (Public Works), Administrative Analyst (Public Works), Capital Programs Coordinator, Recreation Manager, Parking Superintendent, Senior Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Senior Engineer, Assistant Human Resources Director, General Services Superintendent, Streets & Utilities Operations Manager, Engineering Assistant

TELECONFERENCE NOTICE
This meeting was held with a combination of in-person and teleconference attendance, pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act, Calif. Gov. Code sec. 54953(b).

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. and announced that Councilmember Smith was attending remotely. City Clerk Klein called the roll as highlighted above On question from Mayor Williamson, Councilmember Smith confirmed that he could hear the meeting proceedings, that the agenda had been posted at least 24 hours prior to the meeting at the remote location listed above, and that he was providing public access from the same location, pursuant to GC 54953(b)(3). He stated that no member of the public was present with him at the teleconference location wishing to speak.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Haffa led the Pledge.

CONSENT AGENDA
Public comment on the Consent Agenda was not received.

Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 10 City Council Minutes May 29, 2024
2 On a motion by Councilmember Barber, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, which was conducted by roll call, the City Council approved the CONSENT AGENDA:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Resolutions

1. Amend Resolution 24-051 C.S. to Reschedule the Date for Public Hearing to Consider the Levy of the Alvarado Street Maintenance Assessment from June 18, 2024 to July 16, 2024 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-088 C.S.

2. Amend Resolution No. 24-052 C.S. to Reschedule the Date for Public Hearing to Consider the Levy of the Calle Principal Maintenance Assessment from June 18, 2024 to July 16, 2024 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-088 C.S.
***End of Consent Agenda***

PRESENTATIONS

3. Receive Presentation on the State of Our City’s Infrastructure Funding Needs (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received presentation
Public Works Director Renny, Administrative Analyst Beckman, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Easterling, General Services Superintendent Dwight, and City Manager Uslar gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Rick Heuer, of Measure P & S Oversight Committee and the Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Association, who said the major infrastructure needs had not been brought forward to the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee before the prior year, and said that discussion about future tax measures should take place the sooner the better; Esther Malkin, who said that City employee salaries were not the problem and that previous administrations had demonstrated negligence by not addressing infrastructure needs to an adequate degree; and Richard Ruccello, who echoed concerns about previous administrations not bringing infrastructure needs to the NCIP Committee. During public comments, Mayor Williamson left the Council Chamber from 5:21 p.m. to 5:24 p.m.

The Council discussed the matter.

Public Works Director Renny answered questions posed by the Council. She said that the new Monterey Sports Center humidifier was on its way. She said a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) program book could be completed a month after program approval, and that it would be a living document being updated regularly. She said that City staff was always looking for and Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 11 City Council Minutes May 29, 2024
3 applying for infrastructure grants, and provided examples of grants received. She said that the last assessments were done in 2014.

On question from the Council, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Easterling provided information on sewer projects completed in the previous ten years. On question from the Council, Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira said he was the ADA Coordinator and that the City was working on an ADA Transition Plan update. He addressed the limited potential for receiving grants, explaining that the City was not classed as an underserved community based on income and other data points.

The Council stated that it would be wise to begin conversations with the community early regarding any desired tax measure renewals, and that a renewed Measure P/S should include infrastructure needs. It was stated that a communication and public outreach plan for this would be needed.

Regarding the NCIP, it was stated that better communication was needed. It was requested that after the current round of allocations, the Council consider holding a joint meeting with the NCIP Committee for an engaged conversation about how to move forward with the NCIP and how to address the City's infrastructure needs. Examples were provided of recently submitted projects for the current year's NCIP program, with a statement that these proposed projects did not rise to the priority level of the infrastructure needs that City staff had just presented. It was stated that the NCIP budget should never be higher than that of the CIP.

Regarding the CIP, it was stated that the City should push toward a goal of a 20% CIP.

Regarding the Monterey Conference Center, it was stated that its infrastructure needs had been addressed by past Councils. Regarding the Monterey Sports Center ("MSC"), it was stated that of all of the City's facilities, MSC was among the most heavily used by the community.

Regarding both facilities, interest was expressed in learning more about opportunities for privatization.

Regarding the Monterey Public Library, it was stated that there would need to be a discussion about whether the City could afford the kind of renovation or rebuilding that was originally envisioned.

Regarding funding, the Council requested further information about opportunities for maximizing revenue streams and about qualifying for and aggressively seeking federal infrastructure grants.

It was stated that selling City properties could be a one-time source of funding. It was stated that bond financing may be required. It was stated that partnerships at the regional level could be beneficial.

Citing inflation and the urgency of the infrastructure needs, the Council asked what criteria the staff proposed to use in prioritizing infrastructure projects. It was stated that public safety should be at the top of the priorities, along with risk to economic activity, and how immediate the threat of failure of a facility or equipment. It was stated that the Council needed to allow staff to work proactively on their plan to maintain infrastructure without unnecessary bureaucratic steps of approval. It was stated that serious strategic planning would be needed, along with deep and transparent dialogue with the community.
***Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda)*** Public comment on the closed session was not received.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes May 29, 2024
4 The Council adjourned to closed session at 6:08 p.m.

REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
cs1. Conference with Agency Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for Labor Negotiations; Agency Negotiators: Brette Neal, Gina Russo; Employee Organizations: General Employees of Monterey (GEM), Management Employees' Association (MEA), Monterey Police Association (MPA), Police Lieutenants' Management Association (PLMA), Monterey Fire Fighters' Association (MFFA), Monterey Fire Chief Officers' Association (MFCOA), Monterey Executive Management Employees' Association (MEMEA) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to its labor negotiators

ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 6:37 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 13

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, June 18, 2024
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Human Resources Director, Library & Museums Director, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Housing Manager, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Engineering Assistant, Senior Engineer, Assistant Human Resources Director, Recreation Manager, Senior Engineer, Public Works Administrative Services Manager, Police Lieutenant, Division Chief, Fire Engineer, Senior Administrative Analyst (Fire)
***Afternoon Session Agenda ***

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Barber led the Pledge.

Mayor Williamson provided details to attendees on how to provide public comment per the Council policy.

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognize City Employees for Milestone Anniversaries and Retirements for 2nd Quarter 2024 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Recognized Sergeant Newby
Police Chief Hober gave a verbal presentation recognizing Sergeant Newby on his 20 years of service to the City. The Council congratulated and thanked Sergeant Newby.

Public comment was received by Steve Lightfoot, who made accusations regarding Sergeant Newby. When he began to speak off-topic, his speaking time was cut short by the Mayor.

City Manager Uslar made comments expressing appreciation for Sergeant Newby.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Based on the number of individuals requesting to speak, and with consensus agreement of the Council, Mayor Williamson set the speaking time per person to two minutes for general public Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
2 comments. Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from: Steve Lightfoot; Tom Rowley; Gina Sessions; Nelson Vega; Marta Kraftzeck; Jean Rasch; Keith Rootsaert, of Giant Giant Kelp Restoration Project; Eric Palmer; Karen Brown; Bryan Rosen; and Lorna Moffat.

CONSENT AGENDA
Public comment on the Consent Items was not received.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the CONSENT AGENDA:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Approval of Minutes

2. June 4, 2024 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved
Award of Construction Contracts

3. Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $1,600,690.00 to Precision Grade, Inc. for the Del Monte and Casa Verde Recreational Trail Intersection Improvement Project (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***CIP/NCIP*** Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-100 C.S.

Ordinances

4. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance to Amend Monterey City Code Section 28-14(i) to Except Private Development on Leased City Property from Competitive Procurement Requirements; and Amend Section 28-9(a) to Clarify the Proper Awarding Body for Job Order Contracts (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 3685 C.S.

Resolutions

5. Amend Resolution 23-067, Changing the Position Control List by Adding Three (3) Firefighter Positions, Adding One (1) Assistant Fire Chief Position and Authorizing Appropriation of Funds for the Positions (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-101 C.S.

6. Authorize the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation to Provide Seasonal Lifeguard Services on City of Monterey Beaches for a Cost not to Exceed $50,679 per year (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-102 C.S.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
3 7. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Contract Accepting a Grant for Marine Safety Equipment from the Homeland Security Grant Program-State Homeland Security Program (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-103 C.S.
*** End of Consent Agenda ***
Adjourn to Ocean View Community Services District Meeting: Consent Agenda The City Council adjourned to the Ocean View Community Services District meeting.

8. Receive Ocean View Community Services District Quarterly Report (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received report
City Attorney Davi stated that there was no further report to be made beyond what was in the published agenda report.

Public comment was received from Bob Faulis, of Ruby Falls Fund, LLC, who provided an update on the current status of legal proceedings.

Adjourn to City Council Meeting
The Ocean View Community Services District board adjourned to the City Council meeting.

PUBLIC HEARING

9. Amend the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Grant Activities Plan to Reallocate FY 2020-2024 Funding to Homeless Assistance Activities (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-104 C.S.

Housing Manager Wyatt gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was not received.

The Council discussed the matter. Appreciation was shared to the City's Housing Division staff.

It was noted that homeless services were not well funded in the region generally and that this additional assistance from the City would make a big difference to service providers.

On a motion by Councilmember Haffa, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-104 C.S. amending the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Grant Activities Plan to Reallocate FY 2020-2024 Funding to Homeless Assistance Activities:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
4 PUBLIC APPEARANCE

10. Adopting a Resolution Approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Monterey and the Monterey Executive Management Employees’ Association (MEMEA) for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2027 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-105 C.S.

Human Resources Director Neal gave a brief verbal presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from Rick Heuer, who asked to know the fiscal impact of approving the contract. On question from the public, Human Resources Director Neal provided the information on the fiscal impact that had been included in the published agenda report.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Haffa, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-105 C.S. Approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Monterey and the Monterey Executive Management Employees’ Association (MEMEA) for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2027:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

11. Adopting a Resolution Establishing Compensation and Benefits Packages for Unrepresented Confidential Executive Management Employees (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-106 C.S.

City Manager Uslar gave a brief verbal presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was not received.

On a motion by Councilmember Haffa, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-106 C.S. Establishing Compensation and Benefits Packages for Unrepresented Confidential Executive Management Employees:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

12. Receive Mayor’s Recommendations and Make Appointments to the Appeals Hearing Board, Architectural Review Committee, Board of Library Trustees, Building and Housing Appeals Board, Disabled Access Appeals Board, Historic Preservation Commission, Measures P & S Oversight Committee, Museums and Cultural Arts Commission, Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)
Action: Appointed the Mayor’s recommended appointees, all with terms ending June 30, 2028 (3-2, Councilmembers Haffa and Smith voting no)
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 17 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
5 City Clerk Klein gave the staff presentation. Mayor Williamson provided context and details regarding the process by which he had evaluated the applicants. He said that for each seat he had considered: whether there was more than one candidate; whether there was an incumbent; whether there was someone who had prior service experience on boards, commissions, and committees; an applicant's experience on a board, commission, or committee or otherwise that might be relevant; distribution of representation based on Council districts; diversity of representation; and feedback and input provided to him. Regarding his Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee recommendations, Mayor Williamson said that prior to the agenda report's publication he had shared with three long-time incumbents of the NCIP Committee that he was going to recommend new voices, and thanked them for their longstanding service and work. He said the community should be proud that so many individuals had stepped up to express that they were willing to serve. He stressed the importance of creating space for new voices and perspectives. He referenced the diversity of the proposed appointees who, if appointed, would take the place of the three NCIP Committee members. He addressed rumors that he said were spread online with false information. He stressed that he had selected the proposed appointees because he saw them as capable and able to represent their community. He said that going forward he had asked staff to provide access to the public as applications for boards, commissions, or committees came in. He answered Councilmembers' questions and clarified that with each applicant he had discussed their ability to serve on various boards, commissions, and committees to find the best fit.

Public comments expressing concerns about the appointment recommendations primarily focused on the recommendations for the NCIP Committee and were received from: Jean Rasch, Tom Reeves, Brian Perez, Susi Allen, Rick Heuer, Joe Fogel of the Del Monte Beach Neighborhood Association, Tammy Jennings, Jayme Fields (NCIP Committee Vice Chair), Robert Evans, Richard Ruccello of the Casanova Oak Knoll Neighborhood Association, and Bryan Rosen. Specific concerns cited included the process and what was described as a lack of transparency and communication with neighborhood associations, the Mayor's criteria for making recommendations, the consideration of diversity in making appointments, an alleged plot by the City Manager to take the NCIP's funding, the matter of whether or not applicants would work together with neighborhood associations, the timing of placing new members on the NCIP Committee when the annual process was still ongoing, the loss of institutional knowledge and subject matter expertise, and the need for a more collaborative approach. Richard Ruccello added an allegation that the Mayor had referred to age during their telephone conversation.

Rick Heuer, NCIP Chair, added that the NCIP had been created specifically to give a voice to the neighborhoods which he said had not been well represented in City government at the time of the NCIP's creation, and suggested that the NCIP Chair receive more than the three allotted minutes of public comment when NCIP was a Council meeting topic.

Public comments expressing confidence in the recommendations and the process were made by Eric Palmer, Gabe Sanders, and Esther Malkin of the Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande Neighborhood Assocation. Specific comments made included expressing praise to City staff for good work, gratitude to familiar names and newcomers for applying, appreciation for the transparency of the process and the significant time put in by the Mayor, and the importance of being open to new voices, embracing change, and examining power structures. It was stated that the current process had been put in place by the previous Mayor, that based on the amount of outreach it was disingenous for neighborhood associations to claim they had no voice, and that the Civil Grand Jury report had recommended new voices on the NCIP Committee.

Chinyere Ogbonna, NCIP Committee member, provided an example by describing her path to appointment and stated that there was a place for an open application process that could provide a way for people to become involved in their community. Cristina Medina Dirksen Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 18 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
6 commended being open to new voices to the City's appointed bodies and stated that Shelly Mow Schmidt would bring her impressive skill set to serve the City well on the NCIP Committee.

Early in the public comments, Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 5:25 to 5:26 p.m. and Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 5:27 to 5:31 p.m.

Mayor Williamson said that he did not discriminate and that the assertion that he had referenced age was a fabrication.

On question from the Council, City Attorney Davi clarified that nothing in the Charter or City Code required neighborhood association (“NA”) membership or nominations by NAs. She said that the NCIP Committee's voting night had already taken place and that any new members should watch the recording of the voting night before determining cutoff projects.

Mayor WIlliamson addressed allegations and concerns made in public comments. He said that it was true he had not reached out to NAs and that he had been intentional about keeping the process intact so that it was fair and equitable to everyone who applied. He said that reaching out to the NAs would give an exclusive advantage to that group of people over other individuals or groups that might also have opinions. He noted that he had listened to the recent Monterey Vista Neighborhood Association (MVNA) recommendation to appoint Hans Jannasch as representative and John Sovereign as alternate. He said he felt 100% confident in the people that he was recommending for appointment today. He noted that Chinyere Ogbonna was a prime example of someone who came in without previous NA engagement. He asserted that the process was public and that if someone resigned from the NCIP, the NA should pay attention to when the seat was advertised and available. He said he had not made any appointment suggestions based on political affiliation. He said that the idea of being color blind was shortsighted, and that disadvantages can exist in a community and representation was needed with respect to diversity. He said that diversity factors included diversity of thought and experience. He stressed that term limits were not considered.

The Council discussed the matter. Appreciation was expressed to members who had served in a dedicated and committed way over the years, and to City staff and the Mayor for the outreach, interviewing, recommendations, and other details. Further conversation with NCIP Committee in good faith and collaboration was encouraged, in order to enhance a board that the Council stated should be democratic and participatory.

Regarding neighborhood associations, concern was expressed by the Council about comments made by the public regarding NAs, and about individuals using their platform of NA positions to advocate for their positions on the NCIP Committee. It was stated that the Council would need to more clearly define NA boundaries. On the other hand, concern was expressed about the Mayor not having contacted NAs regarding his appointment recommendations.

Support was expressed by the Council for the Mayor's recommendations including the proposed new additions to the bodies. Appreciation was expressed for the applicants' willingness to participate and be involved in this way with their community. It was noted that the current process had been in place for six to seven years and stated that a Mayor should be accorded a fair amount of discretion when it comes to making appointments. It was stressed that one did not have to be an NCIP Committee representative to share subject matter expertise and be involved in a meaningful way in one's community. It was stated that former members should be encouraged to remain active and mentor new members. It was stated that there had been plenty of access and opportunity to be fair and that everyone in the neighborhood should be included -- that the table should be made longer. It was stressed that having fairness and equity in the appointments process was important, and that it had nothing to do with the NCIP Committee or NAs but that no group should be able to get more of a say. It was stated that this Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 19 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
7 was an opportunity to engage more people and give them a chance to step up, and that nothing could beat actually sitting in the seat.

Concern was expressed by the Council regarding the NCIP Committee portion of the appointments, and it was suggested to delay those appointments and meanwhile hold meetings and invite NCIP Committee applicants to get to know each other. Concern was expressed regarding the loss of knowledge that it was stated would result from letting experienced members' terms end and appointing new members in their stead. It was questioned why the new members could not begin as alternates to learn under the knowledgeable long-time members. It was stated that the appointments process had worked well when it had been a twoCouncilmember Brown Act committee. It was stated that the NCIP Committee leaders had been campaign supporters and fought for the City's benefit to make it a better place. It was stated that their performance had been commendable and that recommending replacements disregarded their competency and involvement.

City Attorney Davi provided information from the NCIP Manual confirming that the cutoff decisions still needed to take place.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Barber, and seconded by Councilmember Garcia, to accept the Mayor's recommendations and appoint, for terms to end June 30, 2028, the following:

Roxanne Fritz, Kent Glenzer, and Thaddeus Hoffmeister to the Appeals Hearing Board; Gabriel Sanders and Justin Pauly to the Architectural Review Committee; Diane de Lorimier, Harish Joshi, and Robert Petty to the Board of Library Trustees; William Pyzel (as member) to the Building and Housing Appeals Board; Roxanne Fritz, Tammy Jennings, and Debra Machado to the Disabled Access Appeals Board; Carol O’Neil, William Pyzel, and Jerilynn Smith-Crivello to the Historic Preservation Commission;
Payam Ostovar to the Measures P & S Oversight Committee; Glodean Champion, Bob Evans, and John O’Neil to the Museums and Cultural Arts Commission;
A.J. Purdy as Aguajito Oaks Representative, Amy Stocker as Alta Mesa Representative, Holly Ochoa as Alta Mesa Alternate, Shelly Schmidt as Casanova Oak Knoll Representative, Chelsea Lenowska as Casanova Oak Knoll Alternate, David Cohick as Deer Flats Representative, David Overton as Deer Flats Alternate, Jayme Fields as Del Monte Beach Representative, Scott Hanson as Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande Representative, Curt Tipton as Downtown Representative, Bella Lofaso as Downtown Alternate, Gary Baker as Fisherman Flats Representative, Marilyn Maxner as Fisherman Flats Alternate, Lee Whitney as Glenwood Representative, Luz Adam as Oak Grove Representative, Pat Erlinger as Oak Grove Alternate, Susan Ricketson as Old Town Representative, Rosemary Robert as Old Town Alternate, Dennis Duke as Skyline Representative, and Jil Johnson as Villa Del Monte Representative, all to the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee; Ben Bence, Justin Ono, and Christian Schmidt to the Parks and Recreation Commission; and Sandra Freeman and Terry Latasa to the Planning Commission.

Lack of support for the motion was expressed, stating that feedback had been received from the public about completing the current work of NCIP committee, and that there had not been an opportunity for neighborhoods to provide feedback about the appointments.

In support of the motion, it was stated that the neighborhoods had learned about the recommendations at the same time everyone else in the public had.

The motion passed by the following vote:

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 20 City Council Minutes June 18, 2024
8 AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Williamson
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Haffa, Smith
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
COUNCIL COMMENTS - None made.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS - None made.
*** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** Public comment on the closed session was received from Eric Palmer, who said that labor negotiations should be important to the public and that the City’s organizational climate was in distress.

The Council adjourned to closed session at 7:14 p.m.

ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
Cs1. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1):

1. Sichel Young v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV002501)

2. Amy Rodriguez v. City of Monterey (Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Case No.

ADJ10194652)
(Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: On two unanimous roll-call votes, the Council gave confidential direction to its legal counsel in the matter of Sichel Young v. City of Monterey and in the matter of Amy Rodriguez v. City of Monterey
Cs2. Conference with Agency Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for Labor Negotiations; Agency Negotiators: Brette Neal, Gina Russo; Employee Organizations: General Employees of Monterey (GEM), Management Employees' Association (MEA), Monterey Police Association (MPA), Police Lieutenants' Management Association (PLMA), Monterey Fire Fighters' Association (MFFA), Monterey Fire Chief Officers' Association (MFCOA), Monterey Executive Management Employees' Association (MEMEA) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: On a unanimous roll-call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to its labor negotiators

ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 8:35 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 21 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Marissa Garcia, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT: Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $1,528,360.00 to ASG Builders for the Citywide Signalized Intersection ADA Upgrades, Phase 3A (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***CIP*** RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution to:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Citywide Signalized Intersection ADA Upgrades, Phase 3A (35C1555) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Waive the requirement to submit the original bid bond by 1:00 pm on the bid opening date;

3. Accept all responsive, responsible bids;

4. Award a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, ASG Builders, in the amount of $1,528,360.00;

5. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; and

6. Authorize staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns;” and Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement”. This action is in accordance with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires Public Works project contract awards exceeding $150,000 to be approved by City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 22 №10/24
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Seven (7) bids were received and opened by the Finance Director’s Designee on April 30, 2024 as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
ASG Builders $1,528,360.00
Precision Grade, Inc. $1,604,619.00
Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc. $1,629,116.00 The Don Chapin Company $1,811,180.00
S&H Construction, Inc. $1,968,600.00
Granite Rock Company, Inc. $2,041,583.00
Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc. $2,041,936.00
Basis of award for this project is based on the Total Base Bid.

Total Project Construction Estimate:

Construction Contract (Total Base Bid) $1,528,360.00
Construction Contingency, 15% $229,254.00
Total Project Construction Estimate $1,757,614.00
Construction Management (City Staff & Indirect Cost) $240,000.00 Total Project Construction Estimate (w/ Soft Costs) $2,085,311.85 Funding Sources:

Measure P-ADA (35C1555) $8,958,880.97
As of May 22, 2024, sufficient funding is available to complete the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the demolition of existing noncompliant curb ramps and installation of ADA compliant curb ramps as well as installation of traffic signal equipment including mast arms and poles at nine intersections. The mast arms and poles require foundations, which range from six to 15 feet deep; a depth typically within the native soil. All work is within the public right-of-way.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a - Location - does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 23 №10/24
Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements' limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements. which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8). The project will disturb native soil. A Phase I Archeological Report was prepared for the project on January 4, 2023 by Dudek. As recommended by the report, the project will have a qualified archeologist monitor all ground disturbing activities during construction, and will comply with California regulations regarding the accidental discovery of human remains. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historical or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to waive the minor irregularity and award the contract to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Council could also choose to rebid the project or not to award the construction contract for this Project; however, the proposed project implements Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades at signalized intersections that are required in accordance with the City’s ADA Transition Plan and delaying the project is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

This project consists of signalized intersection improvements, curb ramp retrofits, curb extensions to accommodate compliant curb ramps and associated street and sidewalk reconstruction at the intersections of Franklin Street at Washington Street and Franklin Street at Tyler Street. It is part of the third phase in a series of planned curb ramp replacement construction contracts for signalized intersections funded by Measure S to achieve ADA compliance and improve access.

Measure P, later extended through Measure S in 2018, is a 1% local special sales tax (sales and use tax) to be used “to address significant deferred maintenance by fixing streets, Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 24 №10/24
sidewalks, and potholes; improve related access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair its 100-year-old storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay.

The Intersections of Franklin Street at Washington Street and Franklin at Tyler Street are signalized intersections which have not received any major repairs or upgrades since the 1960s.

The signal poles are in near failing condition and do not meet current standards. This project will provide major pedestrian upgrades including the addition of Pedestrian Signals and Audible Pedestrian Push Buttons. These push buttons have a “wave activated” feature and may be activated by pressing the button or waving in front of the button in addition to pressing it. These major improvements for pedestrians would not be possible without the support of taxpayers through Measure P/S.

The project plans and specifications were developed by City staff and extensively advertised for construction bids and are available for public review in the Office of the City Engineer (580 Pacific St., Room 7). On April 30, 2024, the city received seven (7) bids. The lowest apparent bidder was ASG Builders. ASG Builders did not submit their original bid bond by the 1:00 PM deadline on the bid opening date as required per the Project Specifications and were deemed non-responsive.

Monterey City Code Chapter 28-4 (c)(2) allows Council to waive any informalities or minor irregularities in bids received. Staff recommends waiving the requirement that the original bid bond be received by the City by 1:00 pm on the bid opening date. The bid bond was delivered at 1:13 PM after the bid bond deadline but before the bid opening at 2:00 PM. This is a one-time exception because the bid bond was uploaded on time, but it was not physically delivered before 2:00 p.m.. The waiving of this administrative irregularity will permit the City to accept the bid as responsive to select the lowest bidder and incur a savings of $76,259, approximately 5% of the construction contract.

MG/ss
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Bid Tabulation
e: Andrew Easterling, City Engineer
ASG Builders
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 25 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,528,360.00 TO ASG BUILDERS GRADE, INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ADA UPGRADES, PHASE 3A PROJECT***CIP/NCIP***
WHEREAS, on the 30th day of April 2024, at 2:00 pm the City of Monterey Finance Department ‘s designee received seven (7) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, Open Gov Procurement, for the Citywide Signalized Intersection ADA Upgrades, Phase 3A (“Project”);
WHEREAS, ASG Builders, Precision Grade, Inc., Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc., The Don Chapin Company, S&H Construction, Inc, Granite Rock Company and Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. submitted bids for the Project; WHEREAS, Precision Grade, Inc., Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc., The Don Chapin Company, S&H Construction, Inc, Granite Rock Company and Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. responsive and responsible bids;
WHEREAS, the bid submitted by ASG Builders, the apparent low bidder, was deemed non-responsive because although the bid bond was uploaded electronically in time, the original bid bond submittal was delivered late;
WHEREAS, Monterey City Code Chapter 28-4 (c)(2) allows Council to waive any informalities or minor irregularities in bids received. Staff recommends waiving the requirement that the original bid bond be received by the City by 1:00 pm on the bid opening date. The bid bond was delivered at 1:13 PM after the bid bond deadline but before the bid opening at 2:00 PM. This is a one-time exception because the bid bond was uploaded on time, but it was not physically delivered on time. The waiving of this administrative irregularity will permit the City to accept the bid as responsive to select the lowest bidder and save the City $76,259, approximately 5% of the construction contract;
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Measure P-ADA (35C1555) to complete the work;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the demolition of existing noncompliant curb ramps and installation of ADA compliant curb ramps as well as installation of traffic signal equipment including mast arms and poles at nine intersections. The mast arms and poles require foundations, which range from six to 15 feet deep; a depth typically within the native soil. All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 5, Packet Page 26 considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a - Location - does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements' limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements. which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8). The project will disturb native soil. A Phase I Archeological Report was prepared for the project on January 4, 2023 by Dudek. As recommended by the report, the project will have a qualified archeologist monitor all ground disturbing activities during construction, and will comply with California regulations regarding the accidental discovery of human remains. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historical or archeological resources;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Citywide Signalized Intersection ADA Upgrades, Phase 3A Project (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 6, Packet Page 27 authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Waive the requirement to submit the original bid bond by 1:00 pm on the bid opening date;

3. Accept all responsive, responsible bids;

4. Award a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, ASG Builders, in the amount of $1,528,360.00;

5. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; and

6. Authorize staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 7, Packet Page 28 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - CITYWIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ADA UPGRADES, PHASE 3A

Page 1 ends

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ADA UPGRADES, PHASE 3A RESPONSE DEADLINE: April 30, 2024 at 2:00 pm
Tuesday, April 30, 2024

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
ASG Builders $1,528,360.00
Precision Grade Inc $1,604,619.00
Anderson Pacific
Engineering Construction,
Inc.
$1,629,116.00
The Don Chapin Company $1,811,180.00
S&H Construction, Inc $1,968,600.0026
Granite Rock Company $2,041,583.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$2,041,936.00
TABLE 1
Vendor Total
ASG Builders $1,528,360.00
Precision Grade Inc $1,604,619.00
Anderson Pacific
Engineering Construction,
Inc.
$1,629,116.00
The Don Chapin Company $1,811,180.00
S&H Construction, Inc $1,968,600.0026
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 8, Packet Page 29

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ADA UPGRADES, PHASE 3A

Page 2 ends

Vendor Total
Granite Rock Company $2,041,583.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$2,041,936.00
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 9, Packet Page 30 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Max Rieser, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $529,925 to Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4 (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***Measure P/S*** RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4 (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $529,925;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; and

5. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City;” Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement” and “Identify and seek grant funding opportunities for City services and infrastructure, including parks, recreation, library, museums, public safety, fire prevention, and planning.” This action is in accordance with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires Public Works project contract awards exceeding $150,000 to be approved by City Council.

Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 31 №10/24
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Three (3) bids were received and opened by the Finance Director’s designee on June 11, 2024 as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. $529,925.00
Monterey Peninsula Engineering $568,573.00
The Don Chapin Company $570,570.00
Basis of award for this project is based on the Total Base Bid.

Total Project Construction Estimate:

Construction Contract (Total Base Bid) $529,925.00
Construction Contingency, 15% $79,488.75
Total Project Construction Estimate (This Authorization) $609,313.75 Construction Management $79,488.75
Total Estimated Cost to Complete the Project $688,902.50 Funding Sources:
(35C1553) $1,275,169.49
As of June 18, 2024, sufficient funding is available to complete the project. The Project is funded by Measure P/S Pavement funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of pavement spot repair, specifically grinding and re-paving portions of Van Buren Street, Del Monte Avenue, and Jackson Street; constructing new curb ramps at Van Buren Street and Seeno; extending the storm drain system along Del Monte Avenue approximately 275 feet of 15-inch storm sewer pipeline; and installing curb ramp retrofits at the cul-de-sac end of Jackson Street. The project would be located within the public right-of-way and would not involve the creation of new lanes. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 32 №10/24
Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8).

Proposed digging for the project would be up to 8 feet in depth. A Phase I Archeological Assessment, dated August 21, 2023, has been prepared for this project. As recommended by the report, the project will include a qualified archeologist monitor for all ground disturbing activities during construction, and will include protocol to follow in the event of accidental discovery of remains. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the construction project for this Project; however, the proposed project implements maintenance activities with additional safety, ADA, and storm drain benefits that support the maintenance of existing infrastructure.

DISCUSSION:

The Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4, consists of pavement rehabilitation, storm drain improvements and ADA curb ramp improvements in the Old Town neighborhood. The Project is in a series of planned improvement projects funded by Measure P/S.

Measure P/S is a 1% sales tax approved by voters in 2014 and continued in 2018 for fixing streets, sidewalks and storm drain systems. Since its adoption, the local district tax has been effective towards improving the City’s average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) from 54 to 79 over the last decade. Measure P/S funds are a dedicated and reliable resource for fixing and maintaining the City’s streets, sidewalks, and storm drains. Without this resource the City would not be able to maintain its streets to the same level of service.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 33 №10/24
The PCI scores of the segments of Van Buren St, Del Monte Ave and Jackson St included in this Project are an approximate average 49. This is considered poor condition. They show significant distresses and are beyond the ability to be maintained with a seal coat, therefore, rehabilitation is necessary. The asphalt portion of the pavement will be completely removed and replaced with new asphalt. The rehabilitation of the street segments will result in a PCI of 100, which is equivalent to a brand-new street.

The Project plans and specifications were developed by City staff and consultants Whitson Engineers. The Project was extensively advertised for construction bids and are available for public review in the Office of the City Engineer (580 Pacific St., Room 7). On June 11, 2024, the City received three (3) bids. The lowest responsive, responsible bid was submitted by Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $529,925.00.

Coastal Paving & Excavating has performed and successfully completed work in the City of Monterey, including the current work on Citywide Curb Ramps Project – Phase 7 and is under contract for Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 6. They have submitted references for their work product. Staff has checked the firm’s references and is comfortable with the ability of the contractor to perform the work successfully. The work is expected to begin in fall 2024 and has a contract duration of 40 working days.

MR/pl
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 34 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $529,925 TO COASTAL PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE ROAD REHABILITATION, PHASE 4 (EXEMPT FROM CEQA, ARTICLE 19, SECTION 15301, CLASS 1) ***MEASURE P/S***
WHEREAS, on the 11th day of June 2024, the City received three (3) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4;
WHEREAS, Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc., Monterey Peninsula Engineering, and The Don Chapin Company submitted responsive, responsible bids; WHEREAS, the basis for determining the low bidder is the Total Base Bid; WHEREAS, Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc. submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid in the amount of $529,925;
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in account Measure P/S (35C1553) to complete the project;
WHEREAS, the Project is funded by Measure P/S (35C1553); and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project involves pavement maintenance (i.e., removing and replacing the asphalt within the existing footprint and structural section of the roadway), ADA curb ramp improvements, and minor sidewalk repairs. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a - Location - does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project is a maintenance project for existing facilities, and does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 35 Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to the improvements limited scope and distinct locations of improvements.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8).

Proposed digging for the project would be up to 8 feet in depth. A Phase I Archeological Assessment, dated August 21, 2023, has been prepared for this project. As recommended by the report, the project will include a qualified archeologist monitor for all ground disturbing activities during construction, and will include protocol to follow in the event of accidental discovery of remains. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on archeological resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the plans and specifications for the for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 4 (35C1553) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and grants the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $529,925;

4. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; and, Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 36

5. Authorizes staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 7, Packet Page 37 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Rafaela T. King, CPA, MBA, Finance Director
Prepared By: Stella Sandoval, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Certifying Compliance with State Law with Respect to Levying Assessments and Special Taxes; and Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the County of Monterey for the Collection of Assessments, Taxes, and Fees (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution certifying compliance with State Law with respect to levying assessments and special taxes; and approve the agreement for collection of special taxes, fees, and assessments as required by the County of Monterey.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The passage of this resolution will ensure the continued collection of assessments and special taxes by the County Tax Collector.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Passage of the resolution will have a positive fiscal effect on the City because the County will continue to collect assessments and special taxes on our behalf. This resolution has no effect on the amount of the assessments and special taxes.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 38 №10/24
this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Non passage of the resolution or agreement would mean that the County would discontinue collection of assessments and special taxes for the City of Monterey. If this were to occur, the city would be in a position of (1) collecting our own assessments and special taxes from individual property owners, (2) paying our outstanding assessment obligations with General Fund monies or (3) defaulting on the outstanding obligations.

DISCUSSION:

In 1997 the County of Monterey informed each agency using their tax rolls for collection of taxes, assessments, fees and charges (other than the 1% ad valorem tax) that they will require, for the 1997-98 fiscal year and each year thereafter, a certification resolution to ensure that Proposition 218’s provisions are being addressed by the agency. The City Attorney and the Finance Director have reviewed the City’s assessments and special taxes that are collected by the County on the annual tax bills and have concluded that we are complying on all issues.

The recurring assessments and special taxes are as follows:
1) Emergency Medical Services – this is a special tax approved by the voters in March 2000.

The tax is currently set at $5.00 per benefit unit, and the proceeds are used to fund paramedic emergency medical service to the citizens of Monterey. 2) Alvarado Street Maintenance District – this is an annual assessment collected from property owners with property fronting Alvarado Street. The funds are used to repair and maintain improvements.
3) Calle Principal Maintenance District – this is an annual assessment collected from property owners with property fronting Calle Principal. The funds are used to repair and maintain improvements.
4) Sewer Service Charges – this is a new property tax-based assessment for the fiscal year 2024-25, which replaces the City’s sewer service charges billed to ratepayers directly every other month through Monterey One Water, the region’s sewer treatment provider.

This action has met all California Health and Safety Code requirements under Section 543 as approved by the City Council on July 16, 2024.

The resolution certifies compliance with the Proposition and includes a hold harmless and indemnification provision for administrative expenses of the County. Additionally, the County of Monterey has updated their agreement to be consistent across all agencies and are requiring the agreement to be submitted with the Resolution for the processing of the 2024-25 secured roll tax bills, which includes taxes, assessments, fees, and charges.

The resolution, signed agreement, and the assessment information are due and will be delivered to the County of Monterey Auditor’s Office no later than August 1, 2023.

RTK/ss
Attachments: 1. Resolution with Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 39 №10/24
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 40 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW WITH RESPECT TO THE LEVYING OF

GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES, ASSESSMENTS, AND PROPERTY-RELATED FEES

AND CHARGES AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT

WITH THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL TAXES,

FEES, AND ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey requests that the Monterey County Auditor-Controller enter those general or special taxes, assessments, or property-related fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A” on the tax roll for collection and distribution by the Monterey County Treasurer-Tax Collector commencing with the property tax bills for fiscal year 2024-25; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Certifies that, the City of Monterey has, without limitation, complied with all legal procedures and requirements necessary for the levying and imposition of the general or special taxes, assessments, or property-related fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A”, regardless of whether those procedures and requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the State of California, in State statues, or in the applicable decisional law of the State of California.

2. The City of Monterey further certifies that, except for the sole negligence or misconduct of the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents, with regard to the handling of the compact disc or electronic file identified as Exhibit “A”, the City of Monterey shall be solely liable and responsible for defending, at its sole expense, cost, and risk, each and every action, suit, or other proceeding brought against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents for every claim, demand, or challenge to the levying or imposition of the general or special taxes, Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 41 assessments, or property-related fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A” and that it shall pay or satisfy any judgment rendered against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents on every such action, suit, or other proceeding, including all claims for refunds and interest thereon, legal fees and court costs, and administrative expenses of the County of Monterey to correct the tax rolls.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement between the County of Monterey and the City of Monterey for the collection of special taxes, fees, and assessments.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 42 EXHIBIT "A"
TO

RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW WITH RESPECT TO THE LEVYING OF GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES, ASSESSMENTS, AND PROPERTYRELATED FEES AND CHARGES FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL TAXES:

None
SPECIAL TAXES:

Emergency Medical Services
ASSESSMENTS:
(#528) Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1
(#533) Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-01

PROPERTY-RELATED FEES AND CHARGES:

City of Monterey Sewer Fees
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 43 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sara South, Engineering Programs Analyst
SUBJECT: Authorize an Appropriation from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance in the amount of $250,000 to the Sidewalk Repair Program (“Project”) and Approve an Amendment to the Job Order Contract with Precision Emprise, LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Projects by Increasing the Contract Funding Limit from $500,000 to $750,000 (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the attached resolution:

1. Authorizing the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $250,000 from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance to the Capital Projects Fund, Sidewalk Repair Program (35C1430) and

2. Approving an amendment for the Job Order Contract with Precision Emprise, LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Projects by increasing the contract funding limit from $500,000 to $750,000, an increase to the contract of $250,000.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City’s policy to approve Public Works contracts exceeding $150,000.

This action is also consistent with the City Council Value Driver to maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On July 18, 2023, Council awarded a piggyback Job Order Contract to Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Projects (Ag-11678) ) for a term of one year with the option to renew for two additional years with an annual funding limit of $500,000 (Reso 23-075).

Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 44 №10/24
As of July 2, 2024, sufficient funding of $250,000 is available in the General Fund’s unassigned fund balance.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project would be for repairs of existing sidewalks using a saw-cutting method, which horizontally slices the trip hazard away and matches the sidewalks at the control joint or cracks. All work is within the public right-of-way and there will be no creation of new lanes. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions founds at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8).

Project improvements would be located within the public right-of-way and would not include digging into native soil. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historic or archeological resources.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 45 №10/24
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose to not increase the job order contract and advise to use City staff to manage this work program. However, current staffing levels make it a challenge to maintain this critical program.

DISCUSSION:

Staff recommends increasing the funding limit for Precision Concrete Cutting to include sidewalk asset management and surveying services. Safe, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks contribute to the walkability and aesthetic image of the City of Monterey. It is in the best interest of all residents that sidewalks are properly maintained and repairs are made when necessary. City of Monterey property owners are responsible for the maintenance and repair of the sidewalk, except for defects in sidewalks caused by street trees, adjacent to their homes or businesses. (See, California Streets and Highways Code section 5610 et seq.; City Code section 32-24.) Property owners are also liable for any damage or injury resulting from the condition of the sidewalk. (City Code section 32-31.1.)
When the City becomes aware of a sidewalk deficiency, an inspection needs to be performed on the portion of sidewalk to determine what repairs are necessary. Cracked, uneven surfaces, excessive deterioration, excessive slopes, and horizontal or vertical offsets that can cause tripping hazards. Once inspections have been completed, property owners (residents, businesses, and/or utility companies) are notified by mail of any sidewalk in need of repair. If the sidewalk deficiency is adjacent to property owned by the City of Monterey or caused by a tree in the public right of way, the City is responsible for the repair of the damaged portion of the sidewalk.

The City has a robust sidewalk repair program funded by Measure S that addresses sidewalk defects that are the responsibility of the City. These large sidewalk repair projects aim to correct the most severe deficiencies, bundled with ADA and other minor repairs, within one area of the City at a time. This approach is effective for City repairs but an important component of this program is being able to address deficiencies that are the responsibility of property owners.

The City has 107 miles of sidewalks that should be routinely inspected. This program also needs to be tracked and managed to ensure repairs have been completed by property owners.

The Public Works Department originally contracted with Precision Concrete Cutting to address minor repairs throughout the City in a timely manner for the sidewalk repairs that were the responsibility of the City. We had previously not taken advantage of the full scope of work included in the piggyback contract.

Precision Concrete Cutting’s scope also provides sidewalk asset management and surveying services that identify and record pedestrian infrastructure issues. They currently provide these services for agencies such as City of San Bruno, City of Concord, and County of San Mateo.

Increasing the price of the City’s contract with Precision Grade to inspect, log, and maintain this sidewalk program will provide for a more complete and efficient sidewalk program. The City Engineer will continue to oversee and issue the repair letters to property owners, this will ensure timely notification and repair of potential tripping hazards.

Therefore, to continue this program of repairs and add additional program management, staff recommends an increase in the funding limit for Precision Concrete Cutting.

AR/ss
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 46 №10/24
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Precision Concrete Cutting
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 47 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE GENERAL FUND’S UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 TO THE SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM (“PROJECT”) AND APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOB ORDER

CONTRACT WITH PRECISION EMPRISE, LLC DBA PRECISION CONCRETE

CUTTING FOR ON-CALL SIDEWALK REPAIR PROJECTS BY INCREASING THE CONTRACT FUNDING LIMIT FROM $500,000 TO $750,000
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2023, Council awarded a piggyback Job Order Contract to Precision Emprise, LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Projects (Ag-11678) ) for a term of one year with the option to renew for two additional years with an annual funding limit of $500,000 (Reso 23-075);;
WHEREAS, the City has a robust sidewalk repair program funded by Measure S that addresses sidewalk defects that are the responsibility of the City, but an important component of this program is being able to address deficiencies that are the responsibility of property owners; WHEREAS, the City’s contract with Precision Grade to inspect, log and maintain this sidewalk program provides for an efficient sidewalk program; WHEREAS, sufficient funding of $250,000 is available in the General Fund’s unassigned fund balance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project would be for repairs of existing sidewalks using a saw-cutting method, which horizontally slices the trip hazard away and matches the sidewalks at the control joint or cracks. All work is within the public right-of-way and there will be no creation of new lanes.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions founds at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 48 Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project is located in the area of high archeological sensitivity as shown in the General Plan (Figure 8).

Project improvements would be located within the public right-of-way and would not include digging into native soil. Therefore, the project would not have an impact on historic or archeological resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $250,000 from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance to the Capital Projects Fund, Sidewalk Repair Program (35C1430) and

2. Approves an amendment for the Job Order Contract (Ag-11678) with Precision Emprise, LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Sidewalk Repair Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 49 Projects by increasing the contract funding limit from $500,000 to $750,000, an increase to the contract of $250,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 50 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: David J. Hober, Chief of Police
Prepared By: Karen Faurot, Senior Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Central Coast Overdose Prevention for Naloxone (NARCAN®) Distribution Boxes (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Central Coast Overdose Prevention (CCODP), a public benefit non-profit organization, for the placement of Naloxone (NARCAN®) distribution boxes.

VALUE DRIVERS:

This action supports City Council’s direction to collaborate with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s previous direction to share local resources and regionalize efforts.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 51 №10/24
this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose not to collaborate with Central Coast Overdose Prevention to place NARCAN® distribution boxes in several City locations.

DISCUSSION:

Central Coast Overdose Prevention is an overdose prevention coalition of care providers, nonprofit organizations, and community members in central California. Their mission is to connect people with substance abuse information and treatment resources, combat the opioid epidemic, and promote a safer, healthier community. According to the CCODP, the number of local deaths caused by fentanyl has increased by over 1900% in the last five years. To combat this public health crisis, government agencies such as the CDC, FDA, California Department of Health Care Services, and the County of Monterey heavily promote the public distribution of NARCAN® nasal spray.

Public distribution, through the use of NARCAN® distribution boxes, provides the community access twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week. Three distribution boxes were placed throughout the City of Monterey by the CCODP in April 2024. The boxes are located outside the Monterey Police Department at 351 Madison Street, outside the Police Outreach and Navigation Center at 401 Camino El Estero, and at the Monterey Transit Center at 500 Munras Street. Encroachment permits were approved for all three locations.

The CCODP has requested a Memorandum of Understanding to outline participant responsibilities and expectations. The MOU requires the CCODP to provide the Naloxone distribution boxes at the designated sites at no cost to the City. The CCODP will maintain and restock the distribution boxes when the Monterey Police Department notifies CCODP of the need to refill. The MOU may be terminated at any time and the CCODP will determine the disposition of the distribution boxes and any unused medication at that time. Staff requests that City Council enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with CCODP for NARCAN® distribution boxes.

DJH/kf
Attachment: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 52 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO

A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CENTRAL COAST OVERDOSE PREVENTION FOR NALOXONE (NARCAN®)
WHEREAS, the Central Coast Overdose Prevention (CCODP), a nonprofit public benefit corporation, placed Naloxone distribution boxes in the City of Monterey. The CCODP has requested a Memorandum of Understanding to outline participant responsibilities and expectations; and
WHEREAS, the CCODP is an overdose prevention coalition of care providers, nonprofit organizations, and community members in central California whose mission is to connect people with substance abuse information and treatment resources, to combat the opioid epidemic, and to promote a safer, healthier community. Public distribution using Naloxone distribution boxes provides the community access twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week; WHEREAS, public distribution, through the use of NARCAN® distribution boxes, provides the community access twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week. Three distribution boxes were placed throughout the City of Monterey by the CCODP in April 2024.

The boxes are located outside the Monterey Police Department at 351 Madison Street, outside the Police Outreach and Navigation Center at 401 Camino El Estero, and at the Monterey Transit Center at 500 Munras Street. Encroachment permits were approved for all three locations;
WHEREAS, the CCODP has requested a Memorandum of Understanding to outline participant responsibilities and expectations. The MOU requires the CCODP to provide the Naloxone distribution boxes at the designated sites at no cost to the City. The CCODP will maintain and restock the distribution boxes when the Monterey Police Department notifies CCODP of the need to refill. The MOU may be terminated at any time and the CCODP will determine the disposition of the distribution boxes and any unused medication at that time; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 53

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Central Coast Overdose Prevention.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 54 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Prepared By: Louie Marcuzzo, Park Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Award Two Citywide Fuel Reduction Job Order Contracts 2024 in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. (Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 25, 2022) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolutions:

1. Awarding a job order fuel reduction contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for a term of one (1) year, with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year terms, with an annual fee not-to-exceed $1,000,000;

2. Awarding a job order fuel reduction contract to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc., the second lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for a term of one (1) year, with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year terms, with an annual fee not-to-exceed $1,000,000;

3. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Specifications.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The contract is consistent with the ongoing greenbelt vegetation fuel reduction program within the City to reduce wildfire risk. In addition, the use of job order contracts is consistent with Council policy and direction to deliver timely and efficient projects.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Three (3) bids were received and opened by the Finance Director’s designee on June 25, 2024.

The results are as follows:

Bidder Bid Amount:

West Coast Arborists, Inc. $122,800.00
Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. $158,803.00
Community Tree Service, LLC. $191,375.00
Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 55 №10/24
Staff intends to allocate the contract amount of not to exceed $1,000,000 from various funding sources on an annual basis for citywide fuel reduction. This sum represents funds from the Forestry Contractual Services account (101-500-5230-0000-4220), Greenbelt Fuel Reduction project (NCP2409), potential future Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project sources, and Grant Funds from the State of Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) for the Implementation of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Action Plan, authorized by Council on October 3, 2023.

There is no minimum dollar value of work guaranteed under this contract, and assignment of work orders is at the sole discretion of the City.

As set forth in Monterey City Code Section 28-9, City Council may award individual annual contracts, referred to as job order contracts, none of which may exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000). The contracts shall be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder and shall be based on plans and specifications for typical work. No job order contract shall exceed three (3) years (including any extensions).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

On October 25, 2022, a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (SCH#2022080742) was approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. P22-024), superseding the originally approved IS-MND for the project that approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2020 (Resolution No. P20-028). The objective of the project is to reduce the risk of wildfire in the City’s greenbelt system through fuel reduction actions undertaken by the City. These actions would be conducted in a manner that minimizes adverse environmental effects and implements goals for resource and habitat management.

The City has identified eight areas within the City’s greenbelt system where fire hazard is high due to high fuel loads. The Project includes fuel reduction within seven City greenbelts; namely, (1) Skyline Forest, (2) Veteran’s Park, (3) Monte Vista, (4) Carmelo Street, (5) Don Dahvee, (6) Josselyn Canyon, (7) Fisherman Flats, and (8) Old Capitol Site. Specific goals that have been established by the City for the project include: reduce the fire hazard within the City’s greenbelt system to an acceptable level of risk; maintain and enhance ecological values for plant and wildlife habitat while achieving fire reduction goals; preserve aesthetic landscape values for neighboring residents and visitors; and improve watershed conditions by protecting it from the adverse effects of wildland fire on soil and water quality.

Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project was posted according to CEQA Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) circulated for public review for the required 30-day public review period, from September 1, 2022 to October 3, 2022 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office and on the City's website for the project. No comment letters were received during the public review period.

The IS/MND identifies that the project could result in potentially significant environmental impacts associated with biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, and mandatory findings of significance. Mitigation Measures have been required that will reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 56 №10/24
level. A Notice of Determination was filed according to CEQA requirements following Planning Commission’s adoption of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project IS-MND.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose not to approve this request. Staff recommends against this alternative because job order contracts have been proven to be an effective tool and will allow the Park Operations/Urban Forestry Division to continue to maintain a reasonable level of fuel reduction on City owned properties and right of ways throughout the City.

DISCUSSION:

The recommended Job Order Contract(s) support greenbelt maintenance by reducing forest fuel loads that present a potential fire hazard. This effort includes cutting annual high grasses and removing dead brush and trees to reduce fire fuel loads. Greenbelt maintenance helps safeguard public and private property within the City boundaries, including Huckleberry Hill and the Old Capitol Site. Integrated vegetation management will promote a healthy ecosystem by helping to enhance the native vegetation and animal populations, and by removing non-native invasive plant species.

There are approximately 412 combined acres consisting of greenbelts and open spaces throughout the City that require greenbelt fuel reduction services. Contracts with service providers have been extremely successful in providing essential fuel reduction and habitat restoration efforts.

The project specifications were developed by City staff and extensively advertised and published on OpenGov, the City’s e-procurement platform. The call for bids contained a bid schedule listing hourly rates for 13 common items including labor, equipment, ancillary costs, etc., related to all phases of tree management and maintenance, including pruning and removal, mowing of annual high grasses, control of invasive species, and miscellaneous associated work to reduce vegetation fire fuels.

On June 25, 2024, the City received three (3) bids. The lowest responsive, responsible bid was submitted by West Coast Arborists, Inc. with a total base bid (items 1 through 13) in the amount of $122,800.00, the second lowest responsive, responsible bid was submitted by Tope’s Tree Service, Inc., with a total base bid in the amount of $158,803.00, the third responsive, responsible bid was submitted by Community Tree Service, LLC., with a total base bid in the amount of $191,375.00. The hourly rates submitted by West Coast Arborists, Inc. and Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. are comparable with previous job order contract prices. Attached is the bid tabulation including line items and bid costs from all bidders.

West Coast Arborists, Inc. and Tope’s Tree Service Inc., have both successfully performed Job Order fuel reduction services for the City in the past. Their staff is very familiar with our City’s urban forest and has been reliable in their responses to the requested services.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 57 №10/24
KL/sg
Attachments: 1. Resolution awarding contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc.

2. Resolution awarding contract to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc.

3. Evaluation Tabulation: Itemized Bid Results
c: West Coast Arborists, Inc., 2200 E. Via Burton, Anaheim, CA 92806 Tope’s Tree Service, Inc., PO Box 51964, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 58 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING CITYWIDE FUEL REDUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACT 2024 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,000,000 TO WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.

WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024 at 2:00 p.m., the Finance Director’s designee received three (3) bids for the Citywide Fuel Reduction Job Order Contract 2024; WHEREAS, job order contracts have been proven to be an effective tool to continue to maintain a reasonable level of fuel reduction on City owned properties and right of ways throughout the City;
WHEREAS, funds for tree maintenance and projects are available from Forestry Contractual Services account (101-500-5230-0000-4220), Greenbelt Fuel Reduction project (NCP2409), potential future Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project sources, and Grant Funds from the State of Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) for the Implementation of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Action Plan, authorized by Council on October 3, 2023; WHEREAS, West Coast Arborists, Inc. with their Grand Total Bid of $122,800.00 was the lowest, responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, On October 25, 2022, a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (SCH#2022080742) was approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. P22-024), superseding the originally approved IS-MND for the project that approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2020 (Resolution No. P20- 028). The objective of the project is to reduce the risk of wildfire in the City’s greenbelt system through fuel reduction actions undertaken by the City. These actions would be conducted in a manner that minimizes adverse environmental effects and implements goals for resource and habitat management. The City has identified eight areas within the City’s greenbelt system where fire hazard is high due to high fuel loads. The Project includes fuel reduction within seven City greenbelts; namely, (1) Skyline Forest, (2) Veteran’s Park, (3) Monte Vista, (4) Carmelo Street, (5) Don Dahvee, (6) Josselyn Canyon, (7) Fisherman Flats, and (8) Old Capitol Site.

Specific goals that have been established by the City for the project include: reduce the fire hazard within the City’s greenbelt system to an acceptable level of risk; maintain and enhance ecological values for plant and wildlife habitat while achieving fire reduction goals; preserve aesthetic landscape values for neighboring residents and visitors; and improve watershed conditions by protecting it from the adverse effects of wildland fire on soil and water quality.

Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project was posted according to CEQA Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) circulated for public review for the required 30-day public review period, from September 1, 2022 to October 3, 2022 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office and on the City's website for the project. No comment letters were received during the public review period.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 59 The IS/MND identifies that the project could result in potentially significant environmental impacts associated with biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, and mandatory findings of significance. Mitigation Measures have been required that will reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. A Notice of Determination was filed according to CEQA requirements following Planning Commission’s adoption of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project IS-MND;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Awards a job order fuel reduction contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for a term of one (1) year, with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year terms, with an annual fee not-to-exceed $1,000,000;

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Specifications.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 60 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING CITYWIDE FUEL REDUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACT 2024 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,000,000 TO TOPE’S TREE SERVICE, INC.

WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024 at 2:00 p.m., the Finance Director’s designee received three (3) bids for the Citywide Fuel Reduction Job Order Contract 2024; WHEREAS, job order contracts have been proven to be an effective tool to continue to maintain a reasonable level of fuel reduction on City owned properties and right of ways throughout the City;
WHEREAS, funds for tree maintenance and projects are available from Forestry Contractual Services account (101-500-5230-0000-4220), Greenbelt Fuel Reduction project (NCP2409), potential future Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) or Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project sources, and Grant Funds from the State of Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) for the Implementation of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Action Plan, authorized by Council on October 3, 2023; WHEREAS, Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. with their Grand Total Bid of $158,803.00 was the second lowest, responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, On October 25, 2022, a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (SCH#2022080742) was approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. P22-024), superseding the originally approved IS-MND for the project that approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2020 (Resolution No. P20- 028). The objective of the project is to reduce the risk of wildfire in the City’s greenbelt system through fuel reduction actions undertaken by the City. These actions would be conducted in a manner that minimizes adverse environmental effects and implements goals for resource and habitat management. The City has identified eight areas within the City’s greenbelt system where fire hazard is high due to high fuel loads. The Project includes fuel reduction within seven City greenbelts; namely, (1) Skyline Forest, (2) Veteran’s Park, (3) Monte Vista, (4) Carmelo Street, (5) Don Dahvee, (6) Josselyn Canyon, (7) Fisherman Flats, and (8) Old Capitol Site.

Specific goals that have been established by the City for the project include: reduce the fire hazard within the City’s greenbelt system to an acceptable level of risk; maintain and enhance ecological values for plant and wildlife habitat while achieving fire reduction goals; preserve aesthetic landscape values for neighboring residents and visitors; and improve watershed conditions by protecting it from the adverse effects of wildland fire on soil and water quality.

Per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project was posted according to CEQA Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) circulated for public review for the required 30-day public review period, from September 1, 2022 to October 3, 2022 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office and on the City's website for the project. No comment letters were received during the public review period.

The IS/MND identifies that the project could result in potentially significant environmental Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 7, Packet Page 61 impacts associated with biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, and mandatory findings of significance. Mitigation Measures have been required that will reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. A Notice of Determination was filed according to CEQA requirements following Planning Commission’s adoption of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project IS-MND;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Awards a job order fuel reduction contract to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc., the second lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for a term of one (1) year, with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year terms, with an annual fee not-to-exceed $1,000,000;

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Specifications.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 8, Packet Page 62 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - CITYWIDE FUEL REDUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACT 2024

Page 1 ends

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE FUEL REDUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACT 2024
RESPONSE DEADLINE: June 25, 2024 at 2:00 pm
Tuesday, June 25, 2024

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
West Coast Arborists, Inc. $122,800.00
Tope's Tree Service, Inc. $158,803.00
Community Tree Service,
LLC
$191,375.00
TABLE 1
Community Tree Service,
LLC
Tope's Tree Service, Inc. West Coast Arborists,
Inc.

Selected Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total
X 1 Mobilization
and
Demobilization
1 LS $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00
X 2 Storm Water
Compliance
1 LS $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00
X 3 Traffic Control 1 LS $20,875.00 $20,875.00 $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 X 4 Laborer 500 HR $92.00 $46,000.00 $90.00 $45,000.00 $84.00 $42,000.00 X 5 Equipment
Operator
300 HR $125.00 $37,500.00 $110.00 $33,000.00 $94.00 $28,200.00 X 6 CA DPR
Licensed Pest
Control
Advisor
10 HR $185.00 $1,850.00 $110.00 $1,100.00 $175.00 $1,750.00 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 9, Packet Page 63

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE FUEL REDUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACT 2024

Page 2 ends

Community Tree Service,
LLC
Tope's Tree Service, Inc. West Coast Arborists,
Inc.

Selected Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Total
X 7 CA DPR
Licensed Pest
Control
Applicator
30 HR $125.00 $3,750.00 $90.00 $2,700.00 $175.00 $5,250.00 X 8 5 Yard or
Larger
Chipper/Brush
Truck
200 HR $40.00 $8,000.00 $25.00 $5,000.00 $40.00 $8,000.00 X 9 Disc Chipper
18” Diameter
Capacity
200 HR $75.00 $15,000.00 $25.00 $5,000.00 $40.00 $8,000.00 X 10 Tracked Disc
Chipper 18”
Diameter
Capacity
100 HR $85.00 $8,500.00 $150.00 $15,000.00 $68.00 $6,800.00 X 11 20-30 HP 4X4
TractorMower
w/Mid-Mount
or PTO
Mounted 40-
inch Rotary or
Flail Mower
300 HR $80.00 $24,000.00 $90.00 $27,000.00 $40.00 $12,000.00 X 12 Skid Steer
Mounted
Masticator 8”
Capacity
Minimum
100 HR $135.00 $13,500.00 $200.00 $20,000.00 $68.00 $6,800.00 X 13 Irrigation
Water Truck
200 Gallon
Minimum
100 HR $25.00 $2,500.00 $50.00 $5,000.00 $40.00 $4,000.00 Total $191,375.00 $158,803.00 $122,800.00
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 10, Packet Page 64 Council
Agenda Report
№07/19
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Christine Davi, City Attorney
Prepared By: Karin Salameh, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Approve Participation in the Nationwide Opioid Litigation Settlement with Kroger and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Participation and Subdivision Agreements, and Request Direct Payments to the City (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve participation in the nationwide settlement agreement that would resolve opioid litigation brought by states and local political subdivisions against The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”) and authorize the City Manager to sign the participation and subdivision agreements and request a direct payment of the settlement funds to the City.

VALUE DRIVERS:

This action meets the City Council’s stated value driver of “working to improve the quality of life of our residents.”
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Yes FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Under the proposed settlement agreements, California will receive a maximum of $122 million if all eligible California local governments sign on. The City’s weighted allocation percentage among eligible California subdivisions is 0.033654%. Based on California's distribution allocations and assuming a best-case scenario for participation, if the City elects to participate, it would receive approximately $41,000 in total. The settlement will be spread over 11 annual payments. If fewer subdivisions participate in the settlement agreement, the City will receive less money due to decreased incentive payments.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 65 to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

See the three options discussed below.

DISCUSSION:

In December, 2021, the City Council authorized the City to participate in a nationwide opioid litigation settlement reached with the three largest pharmaceutical distributors – McKesson, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen (collectively “Distributors”) – and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, including its parent corporation Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Janssen”), which manufactured and marketed opioids. The City elected to receive direct payments and over the first two years the City received $72,828.64 in settlement payments from Janssen and the Distributors combined.

In late 2022, similar nationwide settlements were reached with opioid manufacturers Teva and Allergan, and pharmacies Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS (collectively, the “Pharmacies”).

Although the City was not a party to the underlying actions, it elected to participate in the settlements by executing participation agreements. Under the 5 settlement agreements, California will receive a maximum of $1.8 billion if all eligible California local governments sign on.

As with the prior settlements, the City has three options regarding the settlement with Kroger. It can:

1. Not participate in the settlement. The City's share of the settlement payment would then go to the State of California and the overall payment to the State would not be maximized as a portion of the overall payment is based on the number of participating local entities.

2. Participate in the settlements, but not request a direct payment. Selecting this option would require the City to also forgo direct payments in the Distributors settlement as they are tied together. The City's share of both settlement payments would then go to the County of Monterey. The County is not required to spend the City's share within the City's jurisdiction, but may spend it anywhere in the County. The County would be responsible for all reporting requirements relating to the funds.

3. Participate in the Kroger settlement and request a direct payment. The settlement payments may only be used for abatement activities specified in the agreement, including but not limited to providing funding for Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) facilities, the diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD, etc. Funds received and not spent in accordance with the agreement within 5 years must be transferred to the State. Additionally, annual reports must be filed with the State regarding the use of the funds.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 66 Staff recommends that the City participate in the settlement with Kroger and request a direct payment (option 3). To do so, the City must release its claims against Kroger. In exchange, the City will receive approximately $41,000, which the City can use to combat substance abuse and related issues.

The deadline for eligible cities and counties to join these settlements is August 12, 2024.

Further, information is available on the national settlement on the California website:
https://oag.ca.gov/opioids. Additional information and documents regarding the national settlements and individual state allocations can be found on the Settlements website at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/.

Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/submitted_comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 67 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19

APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONWIDE OPIOID LITIGATION SETTLEMENT

WITH KROGER AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

PARTICIPATION AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS AND REQUEST DIRECT PAYMENTS

TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, a nationwide opioid litigation settlement agreement was reached with The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”), which operates pharmacies throughout the country, including in California;
WHEREAS, although the City of Monterey was not a party to the litigation, it and other cities and counties may elect to participate in the settlement by executing the participation and subdivision agreements;
WHEREAS, under the agreement with Kroger, the State of California will receive a maximum of $122 million, which will be allocated between the State, cities, and counties pursuant to an intra-state allocation agreement;
WHEREAS, settlement payments may only be used for abatement activities specified in the agreement, including, but not limited to, providing funding for Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) facilities, diverting people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD, etc. Funds received and not spent in accordance with the agreement within 5 years must be transferred to the State. Additionally, annual reports must be filed with the State regarding the use of the funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves participation in the nationwide opioid settlement with Kroger and authorizes the City Manager to execute the participation and subdivision agreements and request direct payments to the City.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 4, Packet Page 68 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 5, Packet Page 69 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: Wharf II North Pump House; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Jennifer Towsley (Monterey Fish Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Assignment of Lease (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction for price and terms of payment for the assignment of the lease agreement.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for this type of real estate transaction. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Not to appointing agency negotiators. It does apply to the discussion of the lease assignment.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 70 №10/24
cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding the price and terms of payment for the requested lease assignment.

DISCUSSION:

Monterey Fish Company (“Monterey Fish”) currently leases two spaces on Municipal Wharf No.

2. Monterey Fish leases approximately 3,152 square feet in the warehouse and operates a retail fish market. In addition to the fish market, Monterey Fish has a lease with the City for the north pump house. The lease agreement for the pump house commenced December 1, 2021 and is scheduled to expire November 30, 2026. There is one option to extend the lease for a period of three years.

North Pump House
In a letter dated May 20, 2024, Monterey Fish requested the City consent to the assignment of the pump house lease to Cal Marine Fish Company, LLC (“Cal Marine”). Cal Marine is based in San Pedro, California and does not have plans to change the use of the pump house. Squid, mackerel, sardines, and anchovies will be offloaded from the pump house and processed at Cal Marine’s Salinas facility.

City Council approval is required to consent to a lease assignment. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/ad
e: Jenn Towsley, Monterey Fish Company
Sal Tringali, Monterey Fish Company
Joe Hamby, Inter-Oceanic Holdings
Anthony Vuoso, Cal Marine Fish Company
Rocky Caldero, Cal Marine Fish Company
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 71 №10/24
Brandon Lanza, Plethora Businesses
Brian Nelson, Harbormaster
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 72 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Engineering Assistant II
SUBJECT: Amend Engineer's Report and Confirm Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 Area and the Reduced Assessment Proposed in the Amended Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Engineer’s Report and confirming the area to be assessed for the Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1; confirm the reduced amount of assessments set out in the attached amended Engineer’s Report; and order the same to be filed with the Monterey County Auditor-Controller’s Office.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships. Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action continues a process the City has followed since 1985 that establishes an annual assessment to repair and maintain improvements, and to add to these improvements as necessary, to meet the original intent of the districts established to repair and maintain improvements.

This action supports the Council’s value drivers of “working to improve the quality of life of our residents,” and “ensuring a level of economic vitality sufficient to support our quality of life and municipal infrastructure requirements” by maintaining Alvarado Street at a high standard conducive to commerce and public enjoyment of the downtown area.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Alvarado Street Maintenance District funds maintenance above and beyond normal maintenance activities, with the cost of the improvements reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels. There was a deficit in the Maintenance District’s ending balance to carry Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 73 forward a debit into the FY24/25 budget per S&H Code 22656. A debit of $6,264.00 from the previous year balance will be applied to the FY 24/25 budget. A budget is developed based on the desired level of service and as a result the assessment levy will be $1.57/linear foot/month.

Fees collected under this process must be for services that are over and above fees attributed to the general public. Prior to the establishment of the district, the City performed services and provided enhanced facilities in the Alvarado Street assessment area. The City established this cost and continues to pay for its "base year" maintenance costs escalated by the Consumer Price Index each year. For next fiscal year, the City’s "base year" portion will amount to $55,899.62. In addition to the base year costs, the City will be responsible for paying for the assessments for the City owned parcels within the district.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide not to proceed with the reestablishment of this District. However, the assessment pays for maintenance of enhanced improvements that add to the character of the downtown and support commerce. If the maintenance district were to expire without being annually re-imposed then the City would not have dedicated funds to maintain the enhanced improvements on Alvarado Street at the same level of service. Additionally, if in the future the City wished to re-create a maintenance district it would require the additional work of establishing a new maintenance district, including conducting a vote by the property owners which could fail.

DISCUSSION:

The Alvarado Street Maintenance District 85-1 was formed on April 11, 1985 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets & Highways Code section 22500 et seq.). The purpose of the District is to make minor improvements along the length of Alvarado Street identified in the report. All parcels that receive a special benefit have been identified and included in the report.

The staff recommendation continues a legal process, which began at the Council's meeting on February 20, 2024 when the Council ordered the preparation of the Engineer's Report to establish the annual assessment for the maintenance of Alvarado Street improvements. At the Council’s meeting on April 16, 2024, Council received the Engineer’s Report; adopted a resolution of intention to levy assessment; and set the time for public hearing. At the public Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 74 hearing on June 18, 2024 later revised to July 16, 2024, the Council will be asked to adopt a resolution confirming the assessment and the district boundaries and ordering the same be filed with the County Auditor-Controller’s Office prior to the August 1, 2024 deadline set by the County Auditor.

Staff met with the Assessment District Coordinator and Property Owners on February 26th and March 29th, 2024. At the meetings, staff presented information on the current assessment of district services. The current level of service for sidewalk cleaning is approximately 635 hours/year, or 12.2 hours/week. The district services include charging City administrative costs for the assessment district. The assessment district maintains current contractual and capital outlay items. The services include an assessment district coordinator, grounds maintenance, sidewalk cleanings, plant material and pots, tree light maintenance and energy, and minor painting (of benches, pots, and light poles). Members of the District recommended adjusting the level of service to meet the maintenance district’s current needs.

The assessment to be levied, based on the Engineer’s report presented to the Council on April 16, 2024 was $1.88/linear foot/month, however a revised scope of services reduces the proposed assessment rate to $1.57/linear foot/month. This revised amount is the amount that was included in the ballots. To meet noticing requirements, a legal notice and ballot was mailed to each property owner 45 days prior to the scheduled meeting on July 16, 2024. After the public hearing, if a majority protest is not received, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution certifying compliance with state law concerning the assessment and ordering that it be filed with the County Auditor-Controller's office prior to the County’s August 1, 2024 deadline. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those who are not in favor of the assessment. In other words, ballots received are weighted so that parcels proposed to have a larger assessment count more. It is not a “one parcel, one vote” proceeding. Unless a majority of the weighted ballots are in favor of the proposed assessment, the City may not impose the assessment. A majority protest exists if 50% plus one of the record owners of the parcels subject to the change submit a timely written protest. To be timely, the written protest must be submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protest made by any interested person. Protest must be in writing.

CH/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Amended Engineer’s Report
e: Peter Cofresi, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 75 RESOLUTION NO. - C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY

AMENDING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CONFIRMING ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1 AREA AND THE REDUCED ASSESSMENT PROPOSED IN THE AMENDED ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District was established in 1985 to maintain and fund beneficial improvements on Alvarado Street; WHEREAS, the cost of improvements has been reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels according to the special benefits;
WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District has been renewed annually and has remained in effect since the establishment of the district; WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District funds contribute to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce;
WHEREAS, the City’s base year contribution will include a balance correction credit to this year’s assessment;
WHEREAS, a debit from the previous year ending balance will be applied to this year’s assessment, which results in an assessment rate of $1.57. The total cost to the assessed is $51,176.13;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on July 16, 2024 to consider the assessments for the Alvarado Street Maintenance District No. 85-1 as set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit A) accepted and filed pursuant to Resolution No. 24-051; WHEREAS, evidence was received and considered concerning the diagram and the levy of said assessments;
WHEREAS, the evidence shows that the assessment imposed on each parcel does not exceed the cost of the special benefit conferred on the parcel. The properties subject to the assessment receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large, and that the amount of any assessment is proportion to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 4, Packet Page 76 change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that there was not a majority protest, and the diagram and assessments set forth in said Amended Engineer's Report are hereby confirmed and the Clerk is ordered to file a copy of said diagram and assessments as amended with the County Auditor-Controller.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this day of , 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 5, Packet Page 77 2 Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 6, Packet Page 78 1 AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2024/2025
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director, Engineer of Work for the Alvarado Street Maintenance District, City of Monterey, Monterey County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

The improvements, which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

The maintenance activities of: sidewalk cleaning, litter pickup, landscaping, and street lighting facilities installed pursuant to the Alvarado Street Improvement Assessment District.

This report consists of five parts as follows:

PART A - An estimate of the cost of the improvements.

PART B - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART C - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART D - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Part C by assessment number.

PART E - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part B by assessment number.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE
Engineer of Work
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 7, Packet Page 79 2 AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: _________________ Andrea Renny, Public Works Director City of Monterey, Engineer of Work
By:_______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _____ day of ___________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Monterey, California on the ______ day of _____________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________ day of ____________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 8, Packet Page 80 ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
Estimated Costs for FY 2024/2025
5/16/2024

ACCOUNT ENGINEER'S BUDGET
Personnel
Wages $23,558.40
Benefits $10,751.08
Retirement $11,226.35
SUB TOTAL $45,535.83
Operating supplies 4205 $2,722.00
Utilities 4211 $0.00
Contractual services 4220 $55,263.00
Street lighting 4236 $3,466.00
Vehicle rental 4621 $1,219.00
SUB TOTAL $62,670.00
Capital outlay-Special Projects 4285 $29,270.00
SUB TOTAL $29,270.00
TOTAL $137,475.83
Reduction of Total Cost by City Share ** (55,899.62)
Prior Years City Share Catch-Up (2019-2023) (36,664.08) June 30, 2023 District Deficit Debit per S&H Code 22656 6,264.00 $51,176.13
$1.57
Total LF of Frontage = 2713.35 LF
Contractual 4220 $6,250.00
$29,200.00
$3,600.00
$3,000.00
Tree trimming $900.00
City administrative cost $12,313.00
TOTAL $55,263.00
$3,400.00
$1,100.00
$19,500.00
$500.00
Other District improvements $4,770.00
TOTAL $29,270.00
Basic Assessment District Cost: Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning and grounds maintenance, and allows the ability to pursue additional Capital Outlay.

Net amount to be assessed
Cost per LF/month
Sign repair
** City share for FY 23/24*CPI: $ 54,483.06*(1.026) = $ 55,899.62 CPI = 2.6% DEC 2023
Painting benches, pots, light
poles
Grounds maintenance
Sidewalk cleaning (16)
Assessment Dist. Coordinator
Capital Outlay - Special Projects Tree lights maintenance Landscape enhancements
Tree lights replacement
PART A
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 9, Packet Page 81 Assessment
Number Assessor Parcel Number Alvarado St. Frontage (ft) Percentage of Total
Alvarado St. Frontage Annual Assessment
1 001-572-019 123.83 4.56% $2,335.54
2 001-572-003 53.28 1.96% $1,004.91
3 001-572-004 111.24 4.10% $2,098.08
4 001-572-030 19.95 0.74% $376.27
5 001-572-029 52.75 1.94% $994.91
6 001-572-028 53.94 1.99% $1,017.36
7 001-572-009 52 1.92% $980.77
8 001-572-010 52.05 1.92% $981.71
9 001-572-020 25.26 0.93% $476.43
10 001-572-021 43.57 1.61% $821.77
11 001-572-013 67.5 2.49% $1,273.11
12 001-572-022 33.72 1.24% $635.99
13 001-572-025 92.8 3.42% $1,750.29
14 001-572-017 20 0.74% $377.22
15 001-385-005 31 1.14% $584.69
16 001-385-002 106.48 3.92% $2,008.31
17 001-385-001 101.72 3.75% $1,918.53
18 001-567-019 269.2 9.92% $5,077.35
19 001-567-014 380.49 14.02% $7,176.38
20 001-386-001 194.01 7.15% $3,659.20
21 001-386-002 40 1.47% $754.44
22 001-386-003 50 1.84% $943.04
23 001-388-001 70.5 2.60% $1,329.69
24 001-573-015 27.15 1.00% $512.07
25 001-573-006 86.98 3.21% $1,640.52
26 001-573-005 50 1.84% $943.04
27 001-573-003 21 0.77% $396.08
28 001-573-002 23.25 0.86% $438.52
29 001-573-012 36.25 1.34% $683.71
30 001-574-011 30 1.11% $565.83
31 001-574-028 82.6 3.04% $1,557.91
32 001-574-029 115.94 4.27% $2,186.73
33 001-574-030 64.99 2.40% $1,225.77
34 001-574-004 19.92 0.73% $375.71
35 001-574-016 49.04 1.81% $924.94
36 001-574-012 60.94 2.25% $1,149.38
Totals 2713.35 100.00% $51,176.17
FY 24/25 Assessment will be $1.57/LF/month
PART B
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 10, Packet Page 82 PART C

METHOD OF ALLOCATING COSTS ON THE BASIS OF BENEFIT
ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
The method utilized to allocate the costs associated with the benefits of the district shall be based upon lineal footage of frontage. The total cost necessary to be collected will be divided by the total frontage of the district. This will result in a cost per lineal foot. This amount will be multiplied by the lineal footage of each property frontage on Alvarado Street and Alvarado Mall.

The cost per lineal foot of frontage for the FY 2024/2025 is $1.57 per month.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 11, Packet Page 83 # APN PARCEL ADDRESS OWNER NAME
1 001-572-019 486 Alvarado Street Chyr Robert Y TR 3436 Peachwillow Lane Walnut Creek, CA 94598 2 001-572-003 482 Alvarado Street Songs Dental Studio INC 499 Calle Principal, Suite 4 Monterey, CA 93940 3 001-572-004 464 Alvarado Street Tyler Taren TR ET AL 3987 Missouri Flat Road, Suite 340-324 Placerville, CA 95667 4 001-572-030 462 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 5 001-572-029 458 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 6 001-572-028 452 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 7 001-572-009 440 Alvarado Street Bonifacio Plaza Associates 801 Lighthouse Ave, Suite 109 Monterey, CA 93940 8 001-572-010 434 Alvarado Street Teaby John E & Moraz Andrea TRS 57 Castro Road Monterey, CA 93940 9 001-572-020 432 Alvarado Street Silacci Family Investment LLC 110 John Street Salinas, CA 93901 10 001-572-021 426 Alvarado Street FRE 553 LLC PO Box 5903 Carmel, CA 93921 11 001-572-013 416 Alvarado Street Singh Dheeraj & Suvarna 6590 Tam Oshanter Drive San Jose, CA 95120 12 001-572-022 414 Alvarado Street Sanchez Adobe LLC 39 Wharf No 1 Monterey, CA 93940 13 001-572-025 406 Alvarado Street PRI LLC 2905 Burton Drive Cambria, CA 93428 14 001-572-017 400 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 15 001-385-005 398 Alvarado Street Ordway Buildings LLC 888 Munras Avenue, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 16 001-385-002 351 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 17 001-385-001 316 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 18 001-567-019 2 Portola Plaza Custom House Hotel Co LTD 2 Portola Plaza Monterey, CA 93940 19 001-567-014 201 Alvarado Street Custom House Hotel Co LTD 2 Portola Plaza Monterey, CA 93940 20 001-386-001 301 Alvarado Street Paseo De Alvarado Associates PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93942 21 001-386-002 399 Alvarado Street WFC Holdings Corporation PO Box 2609 Carlsbad, CA 92018 22 001-386-003 399 Alvarado Street WFC Holdings Corporation PO Box 2609 Carlsbad, CA 92018 23 001-388-001 401 Alvarado Street 401 Alvarado LLC 101 Laurel Street San Franciso, CA 94118 24 001-573-015 409 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 25 001-573-006 417 Alvarado Street Monterey Historical Development LLC 417 Alvarado Street Monterey, CA 93940 26 001-573-005 423 Alvarado Street Carmel TDK LLC 25459 Carmel Knolls Drive Carmel, CA 93921 27 001-573-003 429 Alvarado Street Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 28 001-573-002 435 Alvarado Street Beck Stuart B & Ivancko D TRS PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 29 001-573-012 439 Alvarado Street Davi Real Estate LLC PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 30 001-574-011 447 Bonifacio Place Old Capitol Land Company PO Box 107 Monterey, CA 93940 31 001-574-028 449 Alvarado Street NTMA 16 LP 2 Dorey Way Monterey, CA 93940 32 001-574-029 459 Alvarado Street Saucito Land Company PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 33 001-574-030 475 Alvarado Street Saucito Land Company PO Box 87 Monterey, CA 93942 34 001-574-004 481 Alvarado Street Romeka Christina M TR ET AL PO Box 3311 Monterey, CA 93942 35 001-574-016 487 Alvarado Street Churchill Monica M TR 124 Soledad Drive Monterey, CA 93940 36 001-574-012 499 Alvarado Street ACV Associates 53 Skyline Crest Monterey, CA 93940

MAILING ADDRESS
ALVARADO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 85-1
PART D
2024
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 12, Packet Page 84 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MAP.DWG SCALE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANS AND PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF MONTEREY NO. DATE REVISION DATE: SHEET: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CAD DWG NAME: TEL: 831.646.3921 WEBSITE: WWW.MONTEREY.ORG 580 PACIFIC STREET, MONTEREY, CA 93940 SHEET 1 OF 1 ALVARADO STREET PART E MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-1 - PART E - ALVARADO ST - C1 SWJFG JFG C-1 APR 19, 2016 NOT TO SCALE 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 27 28 33 32 31 30 29 34 36 35 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 10 11 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8CALLE PRINCIPAL ALVARADO STREET TYLER STREET

BONIFACIO PLACE

FRANKLIN STREET

DEL MONTE AVENUE PEARL STREET
PACIFIC STREET ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER FRONTAGE (FT) 1 001-572-019 123.83 2 001-572-003 53.28 3 001-572-004 111.24 4 001-572-030 19.95 5 001-572-029 52.75 6 001-572-028 53.94 7 001-572-009 52.0 8 001-572-010 52.05 9 001-572-020 25.26 10 001-572-021 43.57 11 001-572-013 67.5 12 001-572-022 33.72 13 001-572-025 92.6 14 001-572-017 20 15 001-385-005 31 16 001-385-002 106.48 17 001-385-001 101.72 18 001-567-019 269.20 19 001-567-014 380.49 20 001-386-001 194.01 21 001-386-002 40 22 001-386-003 50 23 001-388-001 70.3 24 001-573-015 27.15 25 001-573-006 86.98 26 001-573-005 50 27 001-573-003 21 28 001-573-002 23.25 29 001-573-012 36.25 30 001-574-011 30 31 001-574-028 82.6 32 001-574-029 115.94 33 001-574-030 64.99 34 001-574-004 19.92 35 001-574-016 49.04 36 001-574-012 60.94 LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY # ASSESSMENT NUMBER PART E ATTACHMENT 2 Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 13, Packet Page 85 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Engineering Assistant II
SUBJECT: Amend Engineer's Report and Confirm Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-1 Area and the Reduced Assessment Proposed in the Amended Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council adopt the attached resolution amending the Engineer’s Report and confirming the area to be assessed for the Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-1; confirm the assessments set out in the attached amended Engineer’s Report; and order the same to be filed with the Monterey County Auditor-Controller’s Office.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships. Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action continues a process the City has followed since 2000 that establishes an annual assessment to repair and maintain improvements, and to add to these improvements as necessary, to meet the original intent of the districts established to repair and maintain improvements.

This action supports the Council’s value drivers of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents” and “Ensuring a level of economic vitality sufficient to support our quality of life and municipal infrastructure requirements” by maintaining Calle Principal at a high standard conducive to commerce and public enjoyment of the downtown area.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Calle Principal Street Maintenance District funds maintenance above and beyond normal maintenance activities, with the cost of the improvements reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels. General benefits to the public at large are not paid from special Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 86 assessments. There is a deficit in the Maintenance District’s ending balance that will be applied to the FY24/25 budget. Consistent with Streets & Highways Code section 22656, a deficit of $4,080.00 from the previous year balance will be applied as a debit against the assessment district at the end of the fiscal year. A budget is developed based on the desired level of service and as a result, the assessment rate will be $0.96/linear foot/month. The City of Monterey will be responsible for paying for the assessments for the City-owned parcels within the district.

Funds for this will come from:
 The Parking Fund for the Calle Principal garage and surface lot;  The General Fund for the park parcel frontage; and the City-owned portion of the assessment for 408 Alvarado Street (Monterey Hotel).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide not to proceed with the reestablishment of this District. However, the assessment pays for maintenance of improvements that add to the character of the downtown and support commerce. If the maintenance district were to expire without being annually reimposed then the City would not have dedicated funds to maintain the enhancements to the same level of service. Additionally, if in the future the City wished to recreate a maintenance district it would require the additional work of establishing a new maintenance district, including conducting a vote by the property owners which could fail to pass.

DISCUSSION:

The Calle Principal Maintenance District 00-1 was established in 2000 under the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act (Streets and Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes assessments to install, construct, and maintain landscaping, lighting, and parks and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal. The boundaries of the District include the entire length of Calle Principal. All parcels that receive a special benefit have been identified and included in the report.

The staff recommendation continues a legal process, which began at the Council's meeting on February 20, 2024 when the Council ordered the preparation of the Engineer's Report to establish the annual assessment for the maintenance of Alvarado Street improvements. At the Council’s meeting on April 16, 2024, Council received the Engineer’s Report; adopted a Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 87 resolution of intention to levy assessment; and set the time for public hearing. At this public hearing the Council is asked to adopt a resolution confirming the assessment and the district boundaries and ordering the same be filed with the County Auditor-Controller’s Office prior to the August 1, 2024 deadline set by the County Auditor.

Staff met with the Assessment District Coordinator and Property Owners on February 26th and March 29th, 2024. At the meetings, staff presented the information on the current assessment district services and the current level of service for quarterly sidewalk cleaning. The district services include charging City administrative cost for the assessment district. The assessment district maintains current contractual and capital outlay items. The services include an assessment district coordinator, grounds maintenance, sidewalk cleanings, plant material and pots. Members of the District recommended adjusting the level of service to meet the maintenance district’s current needs.

The assessment to be levied, based on the Engineer’s report presented to the Council on April 16, 2024 was $1.05/linear foot/month, however a revised scope of services reduces the proposed assessment rate to $0.96/linear foot/month. To meet noticing requirements, a legal notice and ballot was mailed to each property owner 45 days prior to the scheduled meeting on July 16, 2024. After the public hearing, if a majority protest is not received, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution certifying compliance with state law concerning the assessment and ordering that it be filed with the County Auditor's office prior to the County’s August 1, 2024 deadline. A majority protest is measured by the areas of the parcels owned by those who are not in favor of the assessment. In other words, ballots received are weighted so that parcels proposed to have a larger assessment count more. It is not a “one parcel, one vote” proceeding.

Unless a majority of the weighted ballots are in favor of the proposed assessment, the City may not impose the assessment. A majority protest exists if 50% plus one of the record owners of the parcels subject to the change submit a timely written protest. To be timely, the written protest must be submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to be heard. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protest made by any interested person. Protest must be in writing.

CH/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Engineer’s Report
e: Peter Cofresi, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 88 RESOLUTION NO. - C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY

AMENDING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CONFIRMING CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1 AREA AND THE REDUCED ASSESSMENT PROPOSED IN THE AMENDED ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District was established in 2000 to maintain improvements and fund beneficial improvements on Calle Principal; WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District has been renewed annually and has remained in effect since the establishment of the district; WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District funds maintenance which contributes to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce; WHEREAS, a debit from the previous year ending balance will be applied to this year’s assessment, which results in an assessment rate of $0.96/linear foot/month; WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on July 16, 2024 to consider the assessments for the Calle Principal Maintenance District No. 00-1 as set forth in the Engineer's Report accepted and filed pursuant to Resolution No. 24-052; WHEREAS, evidence was received and considered concerning the diagram and the levy of said assessments;
WHEREAS, the evidence showed that the assessment imposed on each parcel did not exceed the cost of the special benefit conferred on the parcel. The properties in this district receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 89

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that a majority protest has not been received, and the diagram and assessments set forth in said amended Engineer's Report are hereby confirmed and the Clerk is ordered to file a copy of said diagram and assessments as amended with the County Auditor.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this day of , 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
2 Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 90 1 AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2024/2025
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director, Engineer of Work for the Calle Principal Maintenance District, City of Monterey, Monterey County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

The improvements, which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

The maintenance and installation, including but not limited to, street improvements, landscaping and street furniture, cleaning of sidewalks, upgrading street trees, and litter pickup on Calle Principal between Del Monte Avenue and Polk Street, and side streets of Franklin Street and Bonifacio Plaza.

This report consists of five parts as follows:

PART A - An estimate of the cost of the improvements.

PART B - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART C - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART D - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Part C by assessment number.

PART E - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part B by assessment number.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrea Renny , P.E., PTOE
Engineer of Work
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 91 2 AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: _________________ Andrea Renny, Public Works Director City of Monterey, Engineer of Work
By:_______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _____ day of ___________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Monterey, California on the ______ day of _____________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________ day of ____________, 2024.

CLEMENTINE BONNER KLEIN, City Clerk
City of Monterey, Monterey County, California
By:___________________________
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 92 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
Estimated Costs for FY 2024/2025
5/16/24

ACCOUNT ENGINEER'S BUDGET
Personnel
Salaries $7,852.80
Benefits $3,583.80
Retirement $4,415.59
SUB TOTAL $15,852.19
Operating supplies 4205 $100.00
Utilities 4211 $0.00
Contractual services 4220 $12,241.00
Vehicle rental 4248 $511.00
SUB TOTAL $12,852.00
Capital outlay-Special Projects 4285 $0.00
SUB TOTAL $0.00
Assessment cost TOTAL $28,704.19
June 30, 2023 District Deficit Debit per S&H Code 22656 4,080.00 $32,784.19
$0.96
Total Lineal Feet (LF) of Frontage = 2842.68 LF
Contractual 4220 $250.00
$2,400.00
$1,200.00
$8,391.00
SUB TOTAL $12,241.00
Capital Outlay / Special Project 4285 $195.00
SUB TOTAL $195.00
Sidewalk cleaning (4)
Assessment Dist Coordinator
City administrative cost
Other District improvements
Grounds maintenance
Basic Assessment District Cost: Provides current level of service for sidewalk cleaning and grounds maintenance, and allows the ability to pursue additional Capital Outlay.

Net amount to be assessed
Cost per LF/month
PART A
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 8, Packet Page 93 Assessment
Number Assessor Parcel Number
Calle Principal Frontage
(ft)
Percentage of Total
Calle Principal Frontage Annual Assessment
1 001-525-009 23 0.81% $265.26
2 001-525-006 40 1.41% $461.31
3 001-525-005 60 2.11% $691.97
4 001-525-022 53.3 1.87% $614.70
5 001-525-021 86.5 3.04% $997.59
6 001-525-003 42 1.48% $484.38
7 001-525-002 59 2.08% $680.44
8 001-525-020 146.1 5.14% $1,684.95
9 001-534-010 40.78 1.43% $470.31
10 001-534-009 85 2.99% $980.29
11 001-534-008 69.77 2.45% $804.65
12 001-534-007 69.77 2.45% $804.65
13 001-534-011 176.66 6.21% $2,037.39
14 001-535-001 60 2.11% $691.97
15 001-534-001 35 1.23% $403.65
16 001-534-003 50 1.76% $576.64
17 001-534-002 71.8 2.53% $828.06
18 001-384-003 303.7 10.68% $3,502.53
19 001-385-001 102.01 3.59% $1,176.47
20 001-385-002 138.47 4.87% $1,596.95
21 001-385-004 20.23 0.71% $233.31
22 001-385-0005 45 1.58% $518.98
23 001-572-017 20.31 0.71% $234.23
24 001-572-025 124.86 4.39% $1,439.99
25 001-572-013 69.16 2.43% $797.61
26 001-572-021 22.17 0.78% $255.68
27 001-572-020 35.58 1.25% $410.34
28 001-572-010 51 1.79% $588.18
29 001-572-009 50.99 1.79% $588.06
30 001-572-032 5.02 0.18% $57.89
31 001-572-031 122.56 4.31% $1,413.47
32 001-572-004 104.24 3.67% $1,202.18
33 001-572-003 61.75 2.17% $712.15
34 001-572-018 124.5 4.38% $1,435.84
35 001-571-004 32 1.13% $369.05
36 001-571-002 170.52 6.00% $1,966.58
37 001-571-001 69.93 2.46% $806.49
Totals 2842.68 100.00% $32,784.19
FY 24/25 Assessment will be $0.96/LF/month
PART B
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 9, Packet Page 94 PART C

METHOD OF ALLOCATING COSTS ON THE BASIS OF BENEFIT
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
The method utilized to allocate the costs associated with the benefits of the district shall be based upon lineal footage of frontage. The total cost necessary to be collected will be divided by the total frontage of the district. This will result in a cost per lineal foot. This amount will be multiplied by the lineal footage of each property frontage on Calle Principal.

The cost per lineal foot of frontage for the FY 2024/2025 is $0.96 per month.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 10, Packet Page 95 # APN PARCEL ADDRESS OWNER NAME
1 001-525-009 232 Madison Street Medina Joanna TR 4028 Sunset Lane Pebble Beach, CA 93953 2 001-525-006 590 Calle Principal State of California 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 3 001-525-005 580 Calle Principal Monterey Museum of Art Association 559 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 4 001-525-022 559 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 5 001-525-021 559 Calle Principal Monterey Museum of Art 559 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93942 6 001-525-003 540 Calle Principal The House of the Four Winds Foundation PO Box 1408 Monterey, CA 93942 7 001-525-002 535 Pacific Street Monterey Masonic Temple Corporation 525 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 8 001-525-020 464 Calle Principal State of California 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 9 001-534-010 499 Pacific Street Rossman James M & Giovanna C TRS 700 Briggs 27 Pacific Grove, CA 93950 10 001-534-009 490 Calle Principal Hugo H & Linda TRS 583 Viejo Road Carmel, CA 93923 11 001-534-008 480 Calle Principal Hugo H & Linda TRS 583 Viejo Road Carmel, CA 93923 12 001-534-007 468 Calle Principal Craft Charles Nicholas TR ET AL PO Box 167 Carmel Valley, CA 93924 13 001-534-011 438 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 14 001-535-001 426 Calle Principal Casa De Calle Principal INC ET AL 426 Calle Principal, Suite 203 Monterey, CA 93940 15 001-534-001 410 Calle Principal Middlebury Institute of International Studies 460 Pierce Street Monterey, CA 93940 16 001-534-003 414 Calle Principal Professional Building of Monterey PO Box 3080 Monterey, CA 93942 17 001-534-002 201 West Franklin Street Professional Building of Monterey PO Box 3080 Monterey, CA 93942 18 001-384-003 350 Calle Principal San Carlos Associates LLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3030 Seattle, WA 98101 19 001-385-001 316 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 20 001-385-002 351 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 21 001-385-004 351 Calle Principal City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 22 001-385-005 398 Alvarado Street Ordway Building LLC 888 Munras Avenue, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 23 001-572-017 400 Alvarado Street JMDJ Company 165 West Franklin Street Monterey, CA 93940 24 001-572-025 417 Calle Principal PRI LLC 2905 Burton Drive Cambria, CA 93428 25 001-572-013 416 Alvarado Street Singh Dheeraj & Suvarna 6590 Tam Oshanter Drive San Jose, CA 95120 26 001-572-021 426 Alvarado Street FRE 553 LLC PO Box 5903 Carmel, CA 93921 27 001-572-020 432 Alvarado Street Silacci Family Investments LLC 110 John Street Salinas, CA 93901 28 001-572-010 434 Alvarado Street Teaby John E & Moraz Andrea TRS 57 Castro Road Monterey, CA 93940 29 001-572-009 440 Alvarado Street Bonifacio Plaza Associates 801 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite 109 Monterey, CA 93940 30 001-572-032 449 Calle Principal Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 31 001-572-031 449 Calle Principal Davi Anthony G TR PO Box 2350 Monterey, CA 93940 32 001-572-004 464 Alvarado Street Tylaer Taren TR ET AL 3987 Missouri Flat Road, STE 340-324 Placerville, CA 95667 33 001-572-003 482 Alvarado Street Songs Dental Studio Inc 499 Calle Principal, Suite 4 Monterey, CA 93940 34 001-572-018 Calle Principal (Parking) City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 35 001-571-004 Calle Principal (Parking) City of Monterey 580 Pacific Street Monterey, CA 93940 36 001-571-002 516 Polk Street Casa Amesti Foundation 516 Polk Street Monterey, CA 93940 37 001-571-001 565 Calle Principal Callahan Wesley N TR ET AL 575 Calle Principal Monterey, CA 93940

MAILING ADDRESS
CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 00-1
2024
PART D
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 11, Packet Page 96 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MAP.DWG SCALE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANS AND PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF MONTEREY NO. DATE REVISION DATE: SHEET: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CAD DWG NAME: TEL: 831.646.3921 WEBSITE: WWW.MONTEREY.ORG 580 PACIFIC STREET, MONTEREY, CA 93940 SHEET 1 OF 1 CALLE PRINCIPAL PART E MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 00-1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 00-1 - PART E - CALLE P - C1 SWJFG JFG C-1 APR 19, 2016 NOT TO SCALE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 26 28 29 31 30 32 33 34 35 36 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CALLE PRINCIPAL ALVARADO STREET

BONIFACIO PLACE

FRANKLIN STREET

DEL MONTE AVENUE

PEARL STREET
PACIFIC STREET LEGEND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY # ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSMENT NUMBER ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER FRONTAGE (FT) 1 001-525-009 23 2 001-525-006 40 3 001-525-005 60 4 001-525-022 53.3 5 001-525-021 86.5 6 001-525-003 42 7 001-525-002 59 8 001-525-020 146.1 9 001-534-010 40.78 10 001-534-009 85.0 11 001-534-008 69.77 12 001-534-007 69.77 13 001-534-011 176.66 14 001-535-001 60 15 001-534-001 35 16 001-534-003 50 17 001-534-002 71.8 18 001-384-003 303.7 19 001-385-001 102.01 20 001-385-002 138.47 21 001-385-004 20.23 22 001-385-005 45 23 001-572-017 20.31 24 001-572-025 124.86 25 001-572-013 69.16 26 001-572-021 22.17 27 001-572-020 35.58 28 001-572-010 51 29 001-572-009 50.99 30 001-572-032 5.02 31 001-572-031 122.56 32 001-572-004 104.24 33 001-572-003 61.75 34 001-572-018 124.5 35 001-571-004 32.0 36 001-571-002 170.52 37 001-571-001 69.93

JEFFERSON STREET
POLK STREET 37

MADISON STREET
PART E
ATTACHMENT 2 Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 12, Packet Page 97 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Tom Harty, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Open a Public Hearing to Receive Protests Related to the Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the Property Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2024-25, Approve the Annual Rate Report of Sewer Charges for FY 2024-25, and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Collection of FY 2024-25 Sewer Charges on the Tax Roll if a Majority Protest Does Not Exist (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council open a public hearing and if protests are not made by property owners of a majority of the affected parcels, adopt a resolution approving the Sewer Service Charge Annual Report for FY 2024-25 and authorizing collection of the sewer service charges on the property tax roll.

The vote requires a 2/3 majority of the members of Council, meaning all councilmembers in office, whether or not present for the vote. (Health & Safety Code sections 5473, 5473.3.) .

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Protect and preserve our natural environment by addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions, including protecting the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and our environmental assets from pollution.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with prior action by the City Council and is consistent with the City Council’s strategic initiatives, one of which is to “update the storm drain utility, sanitary sewer and pavement maintenance needs and financing mechanism.” It is also consistent with the strategic initiative “Ensure long term revenue / expenditure balance in the City’s operating budget and develop an infrastructure re-capitalization strategy.” Billing through the County property tax roll is anticipated to provide benefits to both ratepayers and the City. As the collector of general taxes, the County of Monterey guarantees payment for any charges collected on the tax roll. This guarantee of payment allows the City to protect Date: 7/16/2024
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 98 №10/24
revenue with more accuracy and plan future expenditures required to maintain the City’s sewer system. Saving the cost of billing and collections may positively benefit ratepayers; The City’s proposed move to collect its sewer service charges on the property tax roll is permissible under Section 5473 of the California Health and Safety Code.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City’s current sewer rates are billed and collected every two months (six times per year) by Monterey One Water (M1W). Collecting the sewer fees for the year through the Monterey County Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office on the annual tax roll will be cost neutral.

The cost of preparing and mailing the Notice of Public Hearing, estimated at $7,886, was funded from the Sewer Utility Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Instead of collecting the fee on the property tax roll, the City Council could choose to keep charges on the Monterey One Water billing every other month, now that M1W has decided not to switch to the property tax roll at this time. However, that is not recommended because City staff have conducted extensive outreach about the planned move to the property tax roll, M1W staff have stated that it would be more streamlined if the City moves its billing to the property tax roll, and coordination with the County of Monterey on the move to the property tax roll has been underway. For these reasons, staff recommends collecting the City’s sewer fees on the property tax roll.

If the City Council finds valid protests from the owners of a majority of affected parcels, then it must collect the charges through other means than via the tax roll. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.2.)
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 99 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

Monterey One Water’s Push to Move Billing to the Property Tax Roll Developed parcels of real property in the City of Monterey are provided wastewater collection services by the City of Monterey, and wastewater treatment services by Monterey One Water, operator of the regional wastewater treatment facility in Marina.

Currently, Monterey One Water (M1W) bills its services on a bi-monthly basis, six times per year. The City of Monterey currently bills it services through Monterey One Water – the City’s fees are itemized on the bi-monthly bill issued by Monterey One Water.

In mid-2023, M1W announced its intent to bill customers annually for its services, to be included on each parcel’s property tax bill. M1W staff stated that the agency would no longer bill its customers directly starting July 1, 2024, and it would no longer bill on behalf of the City as well.

In anticipation of the City’s move to the property tax roll the City took the following actions:
 May 7, 2024 – Council adopted an update to the City Sewer Ordinance that will allow annual billing to be included on each parcel’s annual tax bill, effective June 6, 2024, should there not be a majority protest. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.)  June 15 & 22, 2024 – Public Hearing Notice of the Notice of Publishing the Annual Report and the Public Hearing were published in the Monterey Herald. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.1; Government Code section 6066.)  June 21, 2024 – City of Monterey sent a public hearing notice to affected property owners, which initiates the protest hearing. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.1.) (Attachment 1.)
 July 16, 2024 –conduct a protest hearing to collect sewer fees on the property tax billing. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.2.)
Monterey One Water Not Billing Through Property Tax After All The City of Monterey learned on June 25, 2024 that the M1W Board of Directors voted to continue direct bi-monthly (six times per year) billing and not move billing to the property tax roll.

Given the recent turn of events, the City can choose to continue to have its sewer fees collected through M1W every two months or make the shift to have billing through the property tax roll.

City and M1W staff believe that, given the substantial work conducted by both agencies to move to the property tax roll and benefits of the change, as well as communications with City ratepayers, the City should continue to have its sewer fees collected through the property tax roll. This would allow annual billing, a reduction in delinquencies, and more streamlined billing for services. Staff believes the only downside to moving to the property tax roll is that ratepayers in Monterey would continue to receive their sewer bill from M1W for M1W services every two months and the City’s sewer bill would be on the property tax roll, which could cause confusion for ratepayers.

Direct Billing Continues for Parcels Located Outside of the City There are some circumstances when the City bills its sewer customers directly for its sewer collection charges; these are instances where gravity flows or other circumstances make it more efficient for the City to provide services outside the City limits, including portions of Seaside, Pacific Grove, Pebble Beach, and all of the Monterey Peninsula Airport District:

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 100 №10/24
 Parcels located outside the City boundary that are connected to the City sewer collection system are currently billed annually for service charges directly by the City. The City may continue to collect service charges directly from property owners located outside the City boundary in FY2024-25.
 Special Districts: the City has five satellite sewer systems outside of the City limits with individual contracts for each satellite system. These areas include the Monterey Regional Airport, Josselyn Canyon, and Sylvan Road. These systems will need to be reviewed to ensure proper cost-recovery for the City of Monterey.

Annual Rate Report
The Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2024-25 Tax Roll describes each parcel of real property that receives sewer services from the City and the amount of sewer service charges to be imposed on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

The written report has been filed with the City Clerk, and is also available for review:
 Online at https://monterey.gov/sewer, available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.  Monterey Public Library, 625 Pacific St., Monterey, during library hours.  Monterey Engineering Division, 580 Pacific St., Room 7, Monterey, during business hours.

Procedure
Ballots remain sealed until the protest hearing. Once public testimony is closed, ballots will no longer be accepted. At the conclusion of the public hearing, an impartial person designated by the agency who does not have a vested interest in the outcome of the proposed action will tabulate the ballots.

A majority protest exists if at least 50% plus one vote of affected property owners file written protests. The Notice was mailed out to the property owners of 9,039 parcels that are served by the City’s wastewater collection system. Therefore, 4,520 protest votes would establish a majority protest resulting in the rates not increasing. Each property will be counted as one vote, regardless of the number of owners. Only one protest per property will be accepted. Written protests must be received at or before the time set for the public hearing. For additional information on how to protest, please see Attachment 1, page 2.

Summary
Staff recommends that the City Council open a Public Hearing to receive Protests of Authorizing the Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2024-25, approve the Annual Rate Report of Sewer Charges for FY2024-25, and adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Collection of FY 2024-25 Sewer Charges on the Tax Roll if a Majority Protest Does Not Exist TH/nr
Attachments:

1. Notice of Filing of Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY 2024-25 Rax Roll and Public Hearing Before the Monterey City Council

2. Proposed Resolution with Exhibit A – Annual Rate Report Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 101 NOTICE

FILING OF ANNUAL RATE REPORT FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE FY2024‐25 TAX ROLL
AND

PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE MONTEREY CITY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given that the City of Monterey Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2024-25 Tax Roll has been filed with the City Clerk. This report describes each parcel of real property that receives sewer services from the City of Monterey and the amount of sewer service charges to be imposed on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The written report is available at the following locations for review:
• Online at https://monterey.gov/sewer available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week • Monterey Public Library, 625 Pacific St., Monterey, during library hours • Monterey Engineering Division, 580 Pacific St., Room 7, Monterey, during business hours Notice is hereby further given that the City of Monterey City Council will hold a public hearing to consider approving the City of Monterey Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2024-25 Tax Roll and directing collection of its sewer rate charges on the Monterey County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes.

DATE: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 at 4:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.

PLACE: Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, 580 Pacific St., Monterey, CA 93940 SUBJECT: Authorizing the Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025
PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: At the public hearing, the City Council will hear and consider all evidence, testimony, objections, or protests, if any, to the Annual Rate Report by all interested persons. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may: (1) adopt, revise, change, reduce or modify any charge or overrule any or all objections and make its determination upon each charge as described in the Annual Report, which decision shall be final; (2) adopt the Annual Rate Report as presented or modified by the Council; and (3) direct the City Clerk to file a copy of the Annual Rate Report as presented or modified with the Auditor-Controller of the County of Monterey for the purpose of placing the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 sewer service charges and any delinquencies on the tax roll. If the City Council finds that protest is made by the owners of a majority of separate parcels of property described in the Annual Report, then the Annual Report shall not be adopted and the charges shall be collected separately from the tax roll.

DETAILED INFORMATION: The Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2024-25 Tax Roll is filed and available online 24/7 at monterey.gov/sewer and at the Monterey Public Library (625 Pacific St.) during library hours and the Engineering Division (580 Pacific St., Room 7) during business hours. The meeting agenda will be posted at least 72 hours before the meeting outside the Council Chamber at 580 Pacific St., Monterey, CA 93940 and on https://isearchmonterey.org/
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 102 HOW TO PROTEST: Any owner of a parcel for which sewer rate charges are proposed to be moved to the Monterey County tax roll may submit a written protest regarding this proposed collection mechanism; however, only one protest will be counted per identified parcel. Any written protest must:

1. State that the property owner is opposed to the proposed change to move sewer rate collections to the tax roll;

2. Provide the location of the identified parcel (by street address or assessor’s parcel number);

3. Include the full name and signature of the property owner submitting the protest; and

4. Be received by the City before the end of the public hearing on July 16, 2024.

Written protests from property owners may be submitted in writing any time before the closing of the City Council public hearing on July 16, 2024. Protests may be submitted by:
• Personal delivery to the secure drop box across from the accessible entrance to the Council Chamber, City Hall, 580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940, with the envelope clearly marked “Attention: Tax Roll Protest”; or
• Mail to the City Clerk, Attention: Tax Roll Protest, 580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940; or • Hand delivery to the City Clerk at the meeting prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on July 16, 2024.

Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a written protest as provided above.

HOW TO PROVIDE INPUT ON THE MATTER (NON-PROTEST): Any interested person or an authorized agent may appear at the hearing and be heard. Comment may be made in writing or by addressing the Council during the meeting. Written comments will not qualify as formal protests unless they meet the specifications outlined above. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a written protest as specified above. Please email [email protected] to submit non-protest written comments or be added to the agenda notification email list.

QUESTIONS? For additional information regarding the proposed move to the tax roll, please contact:

City of Monterey Public Works Department, Engineering Division 580 Pacific Street, Room 7, Monterey, CA 93940
[email protected] (831) 646-3921
ACCESS: For disabled access to the City, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided for this purpose. /s/ Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
Mailed on or before June 21, 2024, and published on June 15, 2024 and on June 22, 2024, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code § 5473.1 and Government Code § 6066.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 103 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
APPROVING THE ANNUAL RATE REPORT OF SEWER CHARGES FOR FY 2024-25 AND AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF FY 2024-25 SEWER CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLL WHEREAS, Monterey One Water (M1W) as the wastewater treatment provider for the City of Monterey and surrounding region, prepared an Annual Rate Report (“Annual Report”) for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2024-25 Tax Roll; WHEREAS, the Annual Report describes each parcel of real property that receives sewer services from the City and the amount of sewer service charges to be imposed on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The Annual Report reflects the new rates adopted by the City on June 4, 2024. The Annual Report has been filed with the City Clerk, and has been available for review at these locations:
 Online at https://monterey.gov/sewer, available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.  Monterey Public Library, 625 Pacific St., Monterey, during library hours.  Monterey Engineering Division, 580 Pacific St., Room 7, Monterey, during business hours.

WHEREAS, charges collected through the tax roll are the responsibility of the parcel owner, who pays the entire property tax bill. The rates adopted on June 4, 2024 that go into effect on July 1, 2024 will not be affected by collecting the charges though the tax roll; WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024 the City Council adopted an update to the City Sewer Ordinance, effective June 6, 2024, that allows annual billing to be included on each parcel’s annual tax bill should there not be a majority protest. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.) WHEREAS, on June 15 and June 22, 2024 the Notice of Filing of the Annual Report and Notice of the Public Hearing (“Notice”) were published in the Monterey Herald. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.1; Government Code section 6066.) WHEREAS, on June 21, 2024 the City of Monterey mailed the Notice to the property owners of 9,039 parcels that are served by the City’s wastewater collection system. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.1);
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024 the City of Monterey held a protest hearing on whether to collect sewer fees on the property tax bill. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.2); WHEREAS, billing through the County property tax roll is anticipated to provide benefits to both ratepayers and the City. As the collector of general taxes, the County of Monterey Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 7, Packet Page 104 guarantees payment for any charges collected on the tax roll. This guarantee of payment allows the City to protect revenue with more accuracy and plan future expenditures required to maintain the City’s sewer system. Saving the cost of billing and collections may positively benefit ratepayers; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The City Council finds and determines that the Notice of the filing of the Annual Report and the time and place of the hearing thereon was published in accordance with Health & Safety Code section 5473.1 and Government Code section 6066.

2. The City Council finds and determines that the Notice was mailed to 9,039 parcels that are served by the City’s wastewater collection system in accordance with Health & Safety Code section 5473.1.

3. After hearing and considering all objection or protests to the Annual Report, if any, the City Council finds that a protest was not made by a majority of the owners of the 9,039 separate parcels of property described in the report and it hereby adopts the Report. (Health & Safety Code section 5473.1.)

4. The sewer service charges listed in the Report, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A, shall be collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 8, Packet Page 105

5. The County of Monterey is authorized to collect the sewer service charges listed in Exhibit A on the tax roll.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 9, Packet Page 106 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
City of Monterey Sewer Service Fees (Wastewater Collection) FY 2024-2025 Data as of: 7/03/24 Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-011-004-000 $130.32 810 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-004-000 $130.32 810 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $2,641.20 700 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $316.56 700 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-011-008-000 $0.00 700 CANNERY ROW Vacant
001-011-008-000 $5,226.60 720 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-011-008-000 $6,398.40 700 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $477.12 700 CANNERY ROW Restaurant - 1 Meal/day 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $316.56 700 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $257.28 700 CANNERY ROW Bakery
001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-008-000 $130.32 700 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-009-000 $130.32 660 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-009-000 $130.32 660 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-009-000 $130.32 660 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-009-000 $130.32 660 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-009-000 $3,961.80 660 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-011-009-000 $316.56 660 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-011-012-000 $130.32 750 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-012-000 $316.56 750 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-011-012-000 $130.32 750 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-011-012-000 $130.32 750 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 1 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 10, Packet Page 107 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-012-008-000 $169.32 774 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-012-008-000 $130.32 774 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-009-000 $130.32 786 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $316.56 711 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $504.00 711 CANNERY ROW Restaurant - 1 Meal/day 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-015-000 $130.32 711 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-018-000 $316.56 751 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-012-018-000 $130.32 751 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-018-000 $130.32 751 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-018-000 $316.56 751 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-012-018-000 $130.32 751 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-018-000 $316.56 751 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-012-018-000 $130.32 751 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-018-000 $130.32 751 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-012-019-000 $22,434.12 750 CANNERY ROW Special User 001-012-020-000 $130.32 799 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-013-003-000 $130.32 807 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-013-003-000 $130.32 807 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-013-003-000 $483.60 807 CANNERY ROW Restaurant - 3 Meals/day 001-013-003-000 $130.32 807 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-013-006-000 $247.68 816 WAVE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-013-006-000 $130.32 816 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-013-010-000 $316.56 851 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-013-013-000 $169.32 800 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-014-003-000 $714.48 900 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Supermarket
001-014-003-000 $316.56 900 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-014-003-000 $316.56 900 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-014-003-000 $257.28 900 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bakery
001-014-004-000 $1,422.24 902 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Large 001-015-003-000 $130.32 867 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-015-003-000 $224.40 867 WAVE ST Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-015-003-000 $130.32 867 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-015-003-000 $174.36 867 WAVE ST Medical Office
001-015-003-000 $130.32 867 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 2 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 11, Packet Page 108 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-015-006-000 $247.68 821 WAVE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-015-007-000 $169.32 805 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-015-018-000 $247.68 845 WAVE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-016-005-000 $4,110.60 701 WAVE ST Restaurant with Bar 001-016-006-000 $247.68 704 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-016-016-000 $2,678.40 763 WAVE ST Restaurant with Bar 001-016-016-000 $130.32 765 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-016-016-000 $130.32 765 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-017-001-000 $18,270.38 886 CANNERY ROW Special User 001-017-001-000 $9,282.62 886 CANNERY ROW Special User
001-017-001-000 $130.34 886 CANNERY ROW Special User
001-017-001-000 $130.34 886 CANNERY ROW Special User
001-017-004-000 $783.96 881 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (51-60 employees) 001-017-005-000 $130.32 866 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-017-005-000 $392.88 898 WAVE ST Business/Government (21-30 employees) 001-021-002-000 $3,277.80 652 CANNERY ROW Hotel/Motel
001-021-002-000 $130.32 650 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-021-002-000 $3,720.00 654 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-021-005-000 $4,017.60 600 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-021-008-000 $2,399.40 444 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-022-001-000 $130.32 585 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-001-000 $130.32 585 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-001-000 $130.32 585 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-001-000 $260.76 585 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-022-001-000 $130.32 585 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-014-000 $130.32 550 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-014-000 $448.80 550 WAVE ST Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-022-014-000 $130.32 550 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-014-000 $130.32 550 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-014-000 $130.32 550 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-014-000 $130.32 550 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-018-000 $169.32 470 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-022-021-000 $130.32 417 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-021-000 $130.32 425 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-022-021-000 $169.32 417 CANNERY ROW Single-Family Residential 001-022-021-000 $169.32 425 CANNERY ROW Single-Family Residential 001-022-040-000 $169.32 498 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-022-041-000 $169.32 484 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-023-006-000 $523.20 625 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (31-40 employees) 001-023-006-000 $130.32 625 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-006-000 $316.56 625 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-023-006-000 $130.32 625 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-006-000 $316.56 625 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-023-011-000 $3,069.00 95 PRESCOTT AVE Restaurant with Bar 001-023-011-000 $130.32 95 PRESCOTT AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 3 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 12, Packet Page 109 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-023-013-000 $130.32 643 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-015-000 $2,269.20 653 CANNERY ROW Restaurant with Bar 001-023-015-000 $280.24 647 CANNERY ROW Special User
001-023-015-000 $130.32 651 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-015-000 $130.32 649 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-015-000 $130.32 645 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $0.00 685 CANNERY ROW Vacant
001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $257.28 685 CANNERY ROW Bakery
001-023-018-000 $130.32 685 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-023-018-000 $316.56 685 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-025-001-000 $2,403.72 585 WAVE ST Hotel/Motel
001-025-004-000 $2,600.64 541 WAVE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-025-005-000 $169.32 529 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-025-007-000 $169.32 503 WAVE ST Single-Family Residential 001-025-008-000 $169.32 140 MCCLELLAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-025-010-000 $130.32 528 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-025-012-000 $247.68 556 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-025-013-000 $169.32 560 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-025-014-000 $247.68 570 - 572 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-025-015-000 $130.32 598 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-025-015-000 $367.20 598 FOAM ST Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-025-015-000 $169.32 598 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-026-001-000 $123.84 141 MCCLELLAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-026-001-000 $130.32 499 WAVE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-004-000 $3,132.12 443 WAVE ST Hotel/Motel
001-026-004-000 $316.56 443 WAVE ST Take-Out Small
001-026-009-000 $169.32 470 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-026-010-000 $174.36 498 FOAM ST Medical Office
001-026-010-000 $130.32 498 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-010-000 $130.32 498 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-011-000 $169.32 102 DRAKE Single-Family Residential 001-026-013-000 $130.32 400 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-013-000 $130.32 400 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-013-000 $130.32 400 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-013-000 $130.32 400 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-026-013-000 $130.32 400 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 4 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 13, Packet Page 110 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-026-018-000 $123.84 457 WAVE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-027-055-000 $260.76 471 WAVE ST Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-031-003-000 $130.32 300 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-031-004-000 $130.32 284 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-031-011-000 $30,338.94 400 CANNERY ROW Special User 001-031-012-000 $3,569.16 242 CANNERY ROW Hotel/Motel
001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 215 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 215 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-004-000 $130.32 225 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-015-000 $174.36 284 FOAM ST Medical Office
001-032-015-000 $169.32 284 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-032-016-000 $130.32 300 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-016-000 $130.32 300 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-016-000 $130.32 300 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-017-000 $130.32 275 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-032-018-000 $2,330.88 200 FOAM ST Hotel/Motel
001-033-004-000 $134.40 304 FOAM ST School - Pre-Grade 6 001-033-004-000 $69.60 304 FOAM ST School - Grade 7 - College 001-033-005-000 $743.04 320 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-006-000 $316.56 101 DRAKE AVE Take-Out Small
001-033-006-000 $130.32 380 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-007-000 $130.32 398 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-007-000 $130.32 398 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-007-000 $130.32 398 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-007-000 $130.32 398 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-033-007-000 $130.32 398 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-034-002-000 $130.32 398 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-001-000 $866.88 299 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-035-001-000 $130.32 299 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-003-000 $169.32 271 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-035-004-000 $743.04 255 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential

Page 5 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 14, Packet Page 111 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-035-005-000 $130.32 245 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-005-000 $130.32 245 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-005-000 $130.32 245 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-006-000 $130.32 243 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-006-000 $130.32 243 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-006-000 $130.32 243 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-007-000 $260.76 201 FOAM ST Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-035-008-000 $247.68 280 - 290 REESIDE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-035-008-000 $130.32 200 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-008-000 $316.56 204 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-035-009-000 $284.40 214 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bar
001-035-013-000 $130.32 296 LIGHTHOUSE AVE School - Minimum 001-035-013-000 $247.68 296 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-035-013-000 $130.32 284 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-013-000 $130.32 296 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-016-000 $130.32 230 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-035-016-000 $3,219.84 230 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-036-001-000 $130.32 299 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-036-001-000 $130.32 299 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-036-001-000 $316.56 299 CANNERY ROW Take-Out Small
001-036-001-000 $130.32 299 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-036-001-000 $130.32 299 CANNERY ROW Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-037-002-000 $123.84 201 CANNERY ROW Multi-Family Residential 001-037-003-000 $123.84 201 CANNERY ROW Multi-Family Residential 001-037-004-000 $123.84 201 CANNERY ROW Multi-Family Residential 001-037-005-000 $123.84 201 CANNERY ROW Multi-Family Residential 001-037-006-000 $123.84 201 CANNERY ROW Multi-Family Residential 001-042-001-000 $130.32 100 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-044-001-000 $260.76 100 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-044-001-000 $532.80 100 LIGHTHOUSE AVE School - Boarding 001-051-002-000 $257.28 301 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bakery
001-051-002-000 $260.76 301 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-051-002-000 $94.08 301 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 1 Meal/day 001-051-003-000 $123.84 300 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-051-003-000 $123.84 360 DICKMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-051-008-000 $130.32 399 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-051-012-000 $316.56 309 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-051-012-000 $130.32 327 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-051-012-000 $130.32 329 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-051-012-000 $743.04 315 - 331 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-051-012-000 $123.84 309 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-051-012-000 $130.32 327 LIGTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-051-013-000 $130.32 320 HAWTHORNE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-051-013-000 $2,699.40 399 DRAKE AVE Rest Home/Convalescent 001-051-014-000 $130.32 361 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 6 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 15, Packet Page 112 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-052-001-000 $130.32 299 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-002-000 $130.32 281 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-002-000 $316.56 281 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-052-002-000 $247.68 281 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-052-006-000 $130.32 225 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-006-000 $130.32 225 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-006-000 $130.32 225 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-006-000 $130.32 225 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-007-000 $169.32 211 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-052-008-000 $130.32 201 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-052-010-000 $247.68 212 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-013-000 $495.36 272 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-015-000 $169.32 360 REESIDE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-052-016-000 $169.32 200 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-052-017-000 $371.52 290 - 298 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-018-000 $619.20 399 DICKMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-052-019-000 $371.52 248 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-020-000 $743.04 262 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-021-000 $495.36 236 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-022-000 $495.36 224 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-052-023-000 $240.36 251 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Dental Office 001-052-023-000 $247.68 247 - 249 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-052-024-000 $371.52 237 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-052-024-000 $130.32 237 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-005-000 $1,733.76 131 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-005-000 $130.32 131 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-005-000 $130.32 131 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-008-000 $866.88 100 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-053-010-000 $495.36 361 REESIDE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-018-000 $495.36 150 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-053-019-000 $619.20 140 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-053-022-000 $169.32 180 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-053-023-000 $247.68 160 - 162 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-053-024-000 $247.68 101 - 103 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-024-000 $130.32 121 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-024-000 $123.84 121 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-024-000 $495.36 115 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-025-000 $495.36 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-025-000 $123.84 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 7 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 16, Packet Page 113 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-053-025-000 $130.32 191 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-054-003-000 $169.32 499 REESIDE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-054-004-000 $495.36 441 REESIDE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-054-005-000 $247.68 169 - 171 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-054-006-000 $169.32 161 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-054-007-000 $247.68 170 LAINE/167 HAWTHORNE Multi-Family Residential 001-054-008-000 $247.68 463 REESIDE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-054-010-000 $169.32 131 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-001-000 $743.04 441 DICKMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-055-002-000 $169.32 265 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-003-000 $169.32 261 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-004-000 $169.32 249 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-005-000 $169.32 237 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-006-000 $169.32 225 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-007-000 $247.68 213 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-055-008-000 $169.32 201 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-009-000 $169.32 440 REESIDE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-055-010-000 $169.32 460 REESIDE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-055-011-000 $169.32 202 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-011-000 $169.32 202 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-014-000 $169.32 260 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-015-000 $169.32 272 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-055-016-000 $169.32 461 DICKMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-055-017-000 $371.52 280 - 298 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-055-018-000 $1,362.24 222 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-001-000 $743.04 399 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-002-000 $169.32 381 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-056-003-000 $169.32 371 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-056-005-000 $495.36 345 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-006-000 $371.52 321 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-006-000 $0.00 321 HAWTHORNE ST Vacant
001-056-007-000 $338.64 301 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-056-008-000 $1,114.56 330 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-010-000 $123.84 461 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-056-010-000 $123.84 461 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-056-011-000 $371.52 481 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-056-012-000 $123.84 499 DRAKE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-056-012-000 $123.84 499 DRAKE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-057-001-000 $169.32 399 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-057-003-000 $169.32 321 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-057-004-000 $169.32 580 DICKMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-057-005-000 $169.32 340 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-057-006-000 $169.32 360 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-057-007-000 $169.32 380 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-058-001-000 $247.68 513 DICKMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential

Page 8 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 17, Packet Page 114 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-058-002-000 $495.36 287 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-003-000 $247.68 261 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-004-000 $371.52 249 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-005-000 $247.68 237 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-006-000 $371.52 225 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-007-000 $247.68 213 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-008-000 $247.68 201 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-009-000 $169.32 540 REESIDE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-058-010-000 $1,114.56 212 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-011-000 $169.32 236 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-058-014-000 $169.32 272 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-058-015-000 $247.68 284 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-058-016-000 $169.32 515 DICKMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-058-017-000 $169.32 519 DICKMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-058-018-000 $495.36 260 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-059-001-000 $169.32 199 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-061-002-000 $130.32 600 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-002-000 $169.32 602 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-061-002-000 $130.32 602 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-002-000 $130.32 604 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-003-000 $495.36 612 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-061-003-000 $130.32 614 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-003-000 $257.28 616 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bakery
001-061-004-000 $1,953.00 622 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant with Bar 001-061-005-000 $130.32 636 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-005-000 $130.32 638 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-006-000 $284.40 650 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bar
001-061-006-000 $130.32 650 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-061-006-000 $247.68 650 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-061-009-000 $130.32 686 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-001-000 $130.32 201 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-007-000 $743.04 500 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-062-007-000 $130.32 500 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-007-000 $130.32 500 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-008-000 $316.56 522 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small 001-062-008-000 $540.60 514 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-062-008-000 $257.28 518 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Bakery

Page 9 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 18, Packet Page 115 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-062-013-000 $130.32 596 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-013-000 $295.80 598 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-062-014-000 $123.84 541 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-062-014-000 $123.84 543 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-062-016-000 $306.00 570 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-062-016-000 $275.52 574 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 1 Meal/day 001-062-016-000 $130.32 580 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-018-000 $130.32 554 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-018-000 $495.36 554 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-062-020-000 $130.32 535 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-020-000 $130.32 535 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-020-000 $247.68 535 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-062-020-000 $371.52 535 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-062-020-000 $130.32 535 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $130.32 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $130.32 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $123.84 540 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-062-021-000 $123.84 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-062-021-000 $130.32 542 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $130.32 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $123.84 544 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-062-021-000 $234.60 530 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-062-021-000 $130.32 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $130.32 550 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-062-021-000 $540.60 538 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-062-023-000 $260.76 211 HOFFMAN AVE Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-062-028-000 $495.36 575 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-063-001-000 $5,098.80 487 FOAM ST Hotel/Motel
001-063-005-000 $247.68 415 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-063-006-000 $123.84 200 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-063-006-000 $123.84 220 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-063-006-000 $123.84 240 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-063-007-000 $130.32 406 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-007-000 $130.32 402 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-007-000 $130.32 400 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-007-000 $130.32 404 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-010-000 $130.32 484 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-063-012-000 $130.32 490 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees)

Page 10 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 19, Packet Page 116 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-063-017-000 $130.32 456 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-064-002-000 $130.32 485 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-064-003-000 $130.32 471 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-064-004-000 $130.32 443 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-064-004-000 $174.36 443 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Medical Office 001-064-005-000 $540.60 401 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-064-010-000 $169.32 456 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-064-011-000 $169.32 442 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-064-012-000 $169.32 428 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-064-013-000 $169.32 414 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-064-014-000 $123.84 400 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-064-014-000 $123.84 360 DRAKE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-065-001-000 $130.32 599 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-065-003-000 $130.32 571 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-065-009-000 $495.36 528 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-065-010-000 $247.68 554 - 556 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-065-014-000 $130.32 360 MCCLELLAN AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-065-015-000 $247.68 514 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-065-015-000 $123.84 514 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-065-016-000 $130.32 585 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-065-018-000 $169.32 543 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-065-019-000 $371.52 542 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-065-020-000 $169.32 397 HOFFMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-065-021-000 $169.32 399 HOFFMAN AVE Single-Family Residential 001-065-022-000 $174.36 501 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Medical Office 001-065-022-000 $174.36 501 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Medical Office 001-065-022-000 $174.36 501 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Medical Office 001-065-022-000 $1,733.76 501 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-065-022-000 $130.32 501 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-004-000 $130.32 639 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-004-000 $130.32 639 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-005-000 $130.32 619 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-005-000 $130.32 623 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-005-000 $247.68 619 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-066-006-000 $1,376.40 611 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant with Bar 001-066-008-000 $130.32 600 HAWTHORNE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-010-000 $169.32 650 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-066-014-000 $169.32 696 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-066-015-000 $169.32 391 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-066-017-000 $240.36 663 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Dental Office 001-066-018-000 $2,105.28 301 PRESCOTT AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-066-018-000 $130.32 693 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-066-018-000 $357.00 675 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-067-001-000 $169.32 401 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-067-002-000 $619.20 687 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential

Page 11 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 20, Packet Page 117 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-067-003-000 $371.52 675 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-004-000 $371.52 663 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-005-000 $371.52 651 - 655 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-006-000 $371.52 639 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-007-000 $247.68 625 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-008-000 $247.68 408 HOFFMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-067-009-000 $371.52 460 - 480 HOFFMAN AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-067-010-000 $169.32 611 LANTERN LN Single-Family Residential 001-067-011-000 $169.32 606 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-067-012-000 $169.32 624 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-067-013-000 $371.52 638 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-014-000 $247.68 650 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-014-000 $123.84 650 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-015-000 $495.36 662 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-016-000 $495.36 674 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-067-019-000 $169.32 403 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-067-022-000 $130.32 698 LAINE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-067-023-000 $247.68 686 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-003-000 $123.84 543 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-003-000 $123.84 543 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-004-000 $247.68 529 - 531 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-005-000 $247.68 509 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-005-000 $123.84 509 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-006-000 $495.36 500 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-007-000 $495.36 510 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-008-000 $371.52 530 - 534 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-008-000 $123.84 528 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-009-000 $371.52 542 - 544 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-010-000 $169.32 557 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-068-011-000 $371.52 556 - 558 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-068-013-000 $509.88 598 LAINE ST Hotel/Motel
001-068-013-000 $169.32 598 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-069-001-000 $1,857.60 491 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-069-005-000 $169.32 456 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-069-006-000 $123.84 470 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-069-006-000 $123.84 470 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-069-007-000 $169.32 484 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-069-008-000 $247.68 498 LAINE/461-463 MCCLELLAN AMulti-Family Residential 001-069-008-000 $123.84 498 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-069-011-000 $169.32 471 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-069-012-000 $743.04 457 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-069-018-000 $169.32 442 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-069-019-000 $247.68 443 - 445 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-071-001-000 $130.32 899 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-002-000 $260.76 871 FOAM ST Business/Government (11-20 employees)

Page 12 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 21, Packet Page 118 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-071-003-000 $169.32 859 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-071-005-000 $495.36 831 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-071-005-000 $130.32 829 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-008-000 $130.32 856 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-008-000 $169.32 856 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-071-010-000 $169.32 870 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-071-014-000 $130.32 828 LIGHTHHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-015-000 $130.32 800 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-015-000 $130.32 800 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-071-016-000 $130.32 898 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-001-000 $316.56 791 FOAM ST Take-Out Small
001-072-001-000 $130.32 791 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-002-000 $130.32 787 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-002-000 $123.84 787 FOAM ST Multi-Family Residential 001-072-003-000 $130.32 775 FOAM ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-005-000 $169.32 739 FOAM ST Single-Family Residential 001-072-012-000 $326.76 715 FOAM ST Animal Hospital
001-072-013-000 $130.32 700 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-015-000 $130.32 740 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-015-000 $130.32 744 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-017-000 $326.76 725 FOAM ST Animal Hospital
001-072-018-000 $130.32 724 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-018-000 $130.32 730 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-018-000 $130.32 734 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-018-000 $510.00 738 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-072-018-000 $130.32 730 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-020-000 $329.28 794 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant - 1 Meal/day 001-072-020-000 $130.32 798 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-072-020-000 $169.32 261 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-073-003-000 $130.32 765 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-073-003-000 $123.84 767 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-073-003-000 $123.84 767 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-073-003-000 $130.32 765 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-073-005-000 $3,813.00 725 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Restaurant with Bar 001-073-006-000 $130.32 701 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-073-007-000 $495.36 360 PRESCOTT AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-073-008-000 $169.32 700 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-073-009-000 $260.76 712 HAWTHORNE ST Business/Government (11-20 employees) 001-073-011-000 $169.32 738 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-073-012-000 $990.72 750 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-073-016-000 $743.04 799 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-073-016-000 $169.32 799 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Single-Family Residential 001-073-016-000 $371.52 799 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-074-002-000 $130.32 883 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-074-005-000 $316.56 831 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Take-Out Small

Page 13 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 22, Packet Page 119 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-074-006-000 $130.32 801 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-074-006-000 $130.32 801 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-074-006-000 $392.88 801 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (21-30 employees) 001-074-007-000 $1,362.24 832 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-074-009-000 $169.32 866 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-074-010-000 $130.32 899 LIGHTHOUSE AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-074-011-000 $130.32 381 DAVID AVE Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-075-002-000 $2,040.00 300 DAVID AVE Restaurant - 2 Meals/day 001-076-001-000 $169.32 461 LINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-076-004-000 $169.32 460 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-076-005-000 $247.68 480 - 480 1/2 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-076-006-000 $247.68 498 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-076-007-000 $371.52 901 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-001-000 $130.32 899 HAWTHORNE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-077-001-000 $130.32 899 HAWTHORNE ST Business/Government (1-10 employees) 001-077-004-000 $619.20 815 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-006-000 $371.52 814 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-009-000 $619.20 886 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-010-000 $169.32 461 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-077-011-000 $169.32 481 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-077-012-000 $169.32 898 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-077-014-000 $743.04 828 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-015-000 $2,848.32 843 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-016-000 $495.36 842 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-017-000 $990.72 803 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-018-000 $866.88 800 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-019-000 $619.20 871 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-077-020-000 $169.32 857 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-077-021-000 $619.20 862 - 872 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-001-000 $169.32 799 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-078-002-000 $169.32 787 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-078-005-000 $1,238.40 725 - 737 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-006-000 $169.32 713 HAWTHORNE ST Single-Family Residential 001-078-007-000 $247.68 701 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-008-000 $743.04 480 PRESCOTT AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-078-009-000 $990.72 700 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-010-000 $247.68 738 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-011-000 $495.36 752 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-012-000 $247.68 762 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-013-000 $169.32 774 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-078-014-000 $247.68 461 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-078-015-000 $169.32 481 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-078-016-000 $371.52 499 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-078-017-000 $990.72 773 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-078-018-000 $247.68 763 HAWTHORNE ST Multi-Family Residential

Page 14 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 23, Packet Page 120 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-081-004-000 $371.52 900 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-081-005-000 $247.68 550 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-081-007-000 $1,238.40 500 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-081-008-000 $169.32 566 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-081-009-000 $169.32 570 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-082-001-000 $371.52 509 - 509 1/2 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-082-002-000 $247.68 875 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-082-006-000 $169.32 838 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-082-007-000 $169.32 850 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-082-008-000 $169.32 862 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-082-009-000 $169.32 874 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-082-010-000 $169.32 561 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-082-011-000 $371.52 599 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-082-013-000 $495.36 827 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-082-015-000 $371.52 824 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-082-016-000 $495.36 812 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-082-017-000 $495.36 580 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-082-018-000 $169.32 851 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-082-019-000 $495.36 839 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-082-020-000 $247.68 500 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-082-021-000 $169.32 540 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-083-001-000 $169.32 799 LAINE ST Single-Family Residential 001-083-002-000 $169.32 541 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-083-003-000 $743.04 787 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-004-000 $247.68 775 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-005-000 $247.68 761 - 763 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-006-000 $247.68 751 - 751 1/2 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-007-000 $619.20 737 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-008-000 $247.68 725 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-009-000 $247.68 713 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-010-000 $247.68 701 LAINE ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-011-000 $247.68 514 PRESCOTT AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-083-012-000 $169.32 578 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-083-013-000 $169.32 598 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-083-014-000 $495.36 728 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-015-000 $495.36 738 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-083-016-000 $169.32 750 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-083-018-000 $371.52 561 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-083-019-000 $371.52 599 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-083-020-000 $169.32 762 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-083-021-000 $247.68 774 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-002-000 $169.32 775 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-003-000 $495.36 763 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-004-000 $169.32 751 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-005-000 $169.32 739 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential

Page 15 of 222 ends

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 7/16/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 24, Packet Page 121 City of Monterey - Sewer Collection Fees, FY 2024-25
Parcel No. Annual Charge
(FY 24/25)
Service Address Category Description
001-084-006-000 $169.32 725 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-007-000 $169.32 711 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-008-000 $371.52 640 PRESCOTT AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-084-010-000 $495.36 724 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-011-000 $123.84 740 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-011-000 $123.84 738 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-012-000 $495.36 750 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-013-000 $247.68 762 - 764 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-014-000 $169.32 774 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-015-000 $619.20 786 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-084-016-000 $247.68 621 - 625 IRVING AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-084-017-000 $169.32 787 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-084-018-000 $169.32 660 PRESCOTT AVE Single-Family Residential 001-084-019-000 $247.68 710 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-001-000 $371.52 601 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-085-003-000 $371.52 863 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-005-000 $169.32 600 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-085-008-000 $169.32 850 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential 001-085-011-000 $247.68 851 - 855 BELDON ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-013-000 $169.32 660 IRVING AVE Single-Family Residential 001-085-014-000 $495.36 810 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-015-000 $169.32 874 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential 001-085-016-000 $247.68 841 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-016-000 $247.68 841 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-017-000 $123.84 831 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-017-000 $371.52 831 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-018-000 $371.52 699 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-085-019-000 $169.32 663 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-085-020-000 $371.52 887 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-021-000 $619.20 883 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-085-022-000 $169.32 824 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential 001-085-023-000 $169.32 830 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential 001-086-001-000 $169.32 999 BELDEN ST Single-Family Residential 001-086-002-000 $247.68 666 - 666 1/2 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-086-003-000 $247.68 682 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-086-004-000 $371.52 698 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-086-005-000 $169.32 616 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-086-006-000 $247.68 951 BELDEN ST Multi-Family Residential 001-087-001-000 $247.68 999 SPENCER ST Multi-Family Residential 001-087-003-000 $169.32 782 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-087-004-000 $169.32 798 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-087-005-000 $495.36 700 DAVID AVE Multi-Family Residential 001-087-006-000 $169.32 750 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-087-007-000 $169.32 766 DAVID AVE Single-Family Residential 001-088-002-000 $338.64 875 SPENCER ST Single-Family Residential

Page 16 of 222 ends
← All documents from this meeting