ATTACHMENT A
LACMTA Voluntary NTD Reporting Program for FY24
Using FY26 FTA Formula Programs Apportionment Data Values Jurisdiction MODE
Total Vehicle
Revenue Miles $ from VRM
Tier II
Operator
Deduction
Total ($)Due
to
Jurisdiction
Alhambra MB 178,987 120,870.60 120,871
Alhambra DR 103,708 70,034.41 70,034
Artesia DR 28,014 18,917.96 18,918
Azusa DR 93,865 63,387.39 63,387
Baldwin Park MB 198,959 134,357.77 134,358
Baldwin Park DR 23,197 15,665.02 15,665
Bell TD - - -
Bell MB 33,352 22,522.73 22,523
Bell DR 13,489 9,109.17 9,109
Bellflower MB 68,623 46,341.37 46,341
Bellflower DR 17,204 11,617.93 11,618
Bell Gardens MB 99,031 66,876.01 66,876
Bell Gardens DR 34,608 23,370.91 23,371
Burbank MB 232,511 157,015.57 (20,867) 136,148
Burbank DR 73,033 49,319.46 49,319
Calabasas MB 85,335 57,627.05 57,627
Calabasas DR 3,494 2,359.51 2,360
Carson MB 27,569 18,617.45 18,617
Carson DR 91,545 61,820.69 61,821
Cerritos MB 96,604 65,237.05 65,237
Cerritos DR 44,433 30,005.77 30,006
Compton MB 181,041 122,257.68 122,258
Compton DR - - -
Covina DR 50,185 33,890.12 33,890
Cudahy MB 33,213 22,428.60 22,429
Cudahy DR 13,602 9,185.33 9,185
Downey MB 101,660 68,651.39 68,651
Downey DR 43,349 29,273.75 29,274
El Monte MB 236,303 159,576.32 159,576
El Monte DR 41,777 28,212.17 28,212
Glendora MB 44,792 30,248.21 30,248
Glendora DR 48,286 32,607.72 32,608
Huntington Park MB 123,747 83,566.82 83,567
Huntington Park DR 42,663 28,810.49 28,810
LACDPWAvocado MB 38,682 26,122.10 26,122
LACDPWELA MB 217,273 146,725.29 146,725
LACDPWELA DR 37,522 25,338.75 25,339
LACDPWEast Valinda MB 43,961 29,687.03 29,687
LACDPWKing Medical MB 33,907 22,897.53 22,898
LACDPWWillowbrook Shuttle MB 73,978 49,957.63 49,958
LACDPWS.Whittier MB 193,159 130,441.01 130,441
LACDPWAthens MB 36,741 24,811.34 24,811
LACDPWLennox MB 28,500 19,246.16 19,246
LACDPWFloranceFirestone MB 58,491 39,499.20 39,499
Lakewood DR 48,613 32,828.54 32,829
Lynwood MB 141,788 95,749.98 95,750
Malibu DT 5,085 3,433.92 3,434
ManhattanBeach DR 22,044 14,886.40 14,886
Maywood MB 33,101 22,353.23 22,353
Maywood DR 17,698 11,951.53 11,952
MontereyPark MB 271,277 183,194.39 183,194
MontereyPark DR 24,343 16,438.92 16,439
Pico Rivera DR 33,879 22,878.62 22,879
Rosemead MB 111,720 75,444.94 75,445
Rosemead DR 44,107 29,785.63 29,786
Santa Fe Springs DR 16,980 11,466.66 11,467
South Gate MB 118,005 79,689.23 79,689
South Gate DT 119,353 80,599.78 80,600
SouthPasadena DR 24,893 16,810.34 16,810
WestCovina MB 136,879 92,434.91 92,435
WestCovina DR 51,139 34,534.36 34,534
West Hollywood MB 111,869 75,546 75,546
Total 4,491,297 3,032,990 (20,867) 3,012,123
FY26 Revenue Mile Rate 0.6753038
City Council Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.H.
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Award of Professional Services Agreement to BOA Architecture for the preparation of concepts for a new Fire Station 63 facility, CIP No. 95049 Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider:
1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Black O’Dowd and Associates, Inc. dba BOA Architecture, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the development and evaluation of conceptual alternatives for the new Fire Station 63 facility, limited to Phase 1 services, in an amount not to exceed $151,200;
2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders within the scope of the agreement not to exceed $15,120 (10% of the original contract amount); and
3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):
The proposed action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) and 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). The agreement provides for the development and evaluation of conceptual alternatives for Fire Station 63. This action does not select or approve a particular concept or authorize construction. Environmental factors will be considered as part of the study.
Executive Summary:
The Public Works Director (“Director”) advertised a Request For Proposals (“RFP”) on July 30, 2026 for the development, presentation and comparatively evaluating concepts for the new Fire Station 63. The City received five proposals by the September 15, 2026 deadline.
The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with BOA Architecture for the development of concepts for the new Fire Station 63 in the amount of $151,200 plus a contingency of $15,120.
Background:
The Public Works Director (“Director”) advertised a request for proposals on July 30, 2026 for the development, presentation and comparatively evaluating concepts for the new Fire Station
63. This is Phase 1 of the development of Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s estimate (PS&E) for the new station, consisting of the development and evaluation of three conceptual alternatives before a concept is selected for further design. The City received five proposals by the September 15, 2026 deadline.
The City received proposals from the following consultants:
• BFK
• BOA Architecture
• KWC
• Rubio Medina
• Studio Practice
Following an extensive evaluation process that included interviews and presentations of the top three firms, staff selected BOA Architecture as the most qualified consultant for this work. It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with BOA Architecture in an amount not to exceed $151,200, for the development of concepts for the new Fire Station 63.
The RFP outlines a comprehensive scope of work for the development, presentation, and comparatively evaluating three required concepts for City review and selection. The three concepts include: (1). a concept that retains the existing building, (2) a concept for partial demolition and partial reuse, and (3) a concept that considers full demolition of the existing building and complete redevelopment.
The scope also includes site assessments, existing building assessment, site and circulation analysis and Fire Department operational workshops. Following evaluation of the three concepts, the City will select a concept before proceeding with further design.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the professional services agreement with BOA Architecture for a total of $151,200 plus a $15,120 contingency.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The proposed award of contract meets the City’s strategic plan goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our City and community by continuing public facility improvements with an emphasis to Fire Station 63.
Fiscal Impact:
The total for the proposed agreement including contingency is $166,320. There are sufficient funds in the FY 2026-27 Budget for this contract as part of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 95049.
Attachments:
1. BOA Architecture Proposal
Staff Report
October 21, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
BOA Architecture Proposal
FEE PROPOSAL
FOR PHASE 1, SCHEDMATIC DESIGN
A & E Design for Monterey Park, New Fire Station 63
date: October 17, 2026 Construction Cost Estimate:
prepared by: BOA, Edward Lok Ng, Architect prepared for: City of Monterey Park
HOURS HR RATE COST TOTAL
PRE-DESIGN
kick-off meetings to verify scope of work,obtain as-built dwgs. 10 hrs 150 1,500 project management, confirm cost/work plan & prep field work 10 hrs 150 1,500 program-functionality assessment; interview user staff 30 hrs 150 4,500 site assessment, as-built measurements & photos 10 hrs 110 1,100 CADD 10 hrs 110 1,100
9,700
ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT DESIGN
concept design (3-options) 80 hrs 150 12,000
project management 20 hrs 150 3,000
CADD-3D modeling, diagrams 50 hrs 110 5,500
ROM construction cost estimate 10 hrs 150 1,500
meetings or coordination with Client 30 hrs 150 4,500
26,500
ARCHITECTURAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN
preliminary design 80 hrs 150 12,000
interior design 40 hrs 150 6,000
project management 50 hrs 150 7,500
CADD-3D modeling, renderings 100 hrs 110 11,000
construction cost estimate 10 hrs 150 1,500
meetings or coordination with Client 40 hrs 150 6,000
44,000
ENGINEERING and EXPENSES
structural engineering 2,000
plumbing (incl. nat gas coordination) 0
mechanical 1,000
electrical (including access controls, Dry utility coordination, CA) 1,000 acoustics consultant 0
civil engineering; on-site, grading, LID (no CEQA) 1,000 topographic land survey and underground utilities 8,000 CEQA 0
landscape architecture 0
asbestos, lead paint, survey and report 8,000
soils/geotechnical 24,000
investigation of existing building 26,000
design of fire alarm and fire sprinklers 0
expenses for blueprints, photocopies, mailing, misc. 0
71,000
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
0 ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
0 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
0 TOTAL UP TO SCHEMATIC DESIGN $151,200
City Council Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.I.
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Rejection of All Bids for January 21 Memorial Project Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider:
1. Rejecting all bids for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 95068 – January 21 Memorial Project; and
2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
Executive Summary:
Per Resolution No. 2026-R43 the Public Works Director solicited bids for CIP 95068 – January 21 Memorial Project. The bid opening was held on September 24, 2026. The City received four bids from California contractors. Staff recommends rejection of all bids because they exceed the City Engineer’s estimate and the budget for this project.
Background:
On September 3, 2026, staff advertised the bid for CIP 95068 – January 21 Memorial project.
The bid opening was held on September 24, 2026, by the City Clerk’s Office and Public Works staff and four bids were received from California contractors. The proposed scope of work includes landscape and irrigation, tree planting, concrete work, lighting and sign installation.
All bids exceed the City’s $357,000 engineer’s estimate and $250,000 budget for this project.
Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council reject all bids pursuant to Public Contract Code § 22038.
Staff will consider options for completing the project.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This action meets the 2026-27 City Council Strategic Plan objective to consider a Permanent Memorial for the January 21, 2023 Incident, which is part of Goal #4, to Maintain, Build and Modernize Infrastructure and Facilities to Support the Current and Future Needs of Our City and Community.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the rejection of all submitted bids.
Attachments:
None
City Council Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.J.
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Diana Garcia, Assistant City Manager
Rebecca Bojorquez, Principal Management Analyst
Subject: United Against Hate Week Resolution, as requested by Mayor Lo Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider:
1. Approving the attached resolution; and,
2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
Executive Summary:
The attached resolution is being brought forth to the Council for consideration at the request of Mayor Lo.
Background:
N/A
Strategic Plan Goal:
N/A
Fiscal Impact:
There is no expected fiscal impact associated with adopting this resolution.
Attachments:
1. United Against Hate Week Resolution
Staff Report
October 21, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
United Against Hate Week Resolution
Resolution No.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING OCTOBER 18 THROUGH OCTOBER
24, 2026 AS UNITED AGAINST HATE WEEK
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monterey Park as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:
A. The City of Monterey Park stands for diversity, inclusivity, and respect for all, irrespective of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability or any characteristic.
B. The City rejects hate, discrimination, and violence, aiming for a prejudice-free community.
C. The City collectively promotes acceptance, respect, tolerance, and unity, enabling residents to live, work and thrive without fear.
D. The "United Against Hate Week" campaign embodies the City’s collective commitment to foster an environment where every resident can live, work and flourish without fear of hatred.
E. The City endorses the "California vs. Hate" coalition's mission to combat hate, prejudice, and intolerance such as xenophobia, anti-Semitism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti-Muslim hatred, and other bigoted views by emboldened hate groups and individuals and intolerance from our communities and encourage communities to report hate incidents to the California vs. Hate hotline.
F. By joining with fellow California cities, the City sends a resounding message that we are united in our resolve to combat hate and promote acceptance.
G. The City calls upon all residents, businesses, schools, and organizations to unite against hate, join events, and champion inclusivity, tolerance and unity.
H. During this week, the City reaffirms its commitment to the following principles:
a. We denounce hate, discrimination and violence in all forms. b. We pledge to stand up against hate and support victims of hate incidents.
c. We encourage open dialogue and respectful conversations to bridge divides and promote understanding.
Resolution No.
d. We celebrate the richness of our diverse community and the strength it brings to our city.
e. We commit to working together, in partnership with other California cities, to create a safe and welcoming environment for all.
I. The City urges community members to report hate incidents to California vs Hate hotline at 833-8-NO-HATE or online at CAvsHate.org, to combat hate effectively and promote a safer environment.
J. The City of Monterey Park enthusiastically supports the United Against Hate Week, in solidarity with the "California vs. Hate" coalition and partners, in Los Angeles on October 18 - 24, 2026 and every day beyond.
SECTION 2: Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 3: Recordation. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to sign this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Monterey Park and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, may attest thereto.
SECTION 4: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk