Moreno Valley City Council
January 18, 2022

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. November 2021 Payment Register

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval  Approved . 1/10/22 7:39 AM
City Attorney Approval  Approved .

City Manager Approval  Approved . 1/10/22 8:52 AM
A.6
Packet Pg. 138
Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
AAC UTILITY PARTNERS, LLC 32098 11/08/2021 MVUT211029 CONSULTING SVCS-MV UTILITIES $31,807.72 11/08/2021 MVUS211029 CONSULTING SVCS-MV UTILITIES
Remit to: COLUMBIA, SC FYTD: $177,626.81

BANC OF AMERICA PUBLIC

CAPITAL CORP
32095 11/01/2021 W211101 DEBT SRV-2011 PRIV PLACEMENT REF OF 97-NOV 2021 LRB PRIN & INT
$330,915.10
Remit to: ATLANTA, GA FYTD: $330,915.10
BOGH ENGINEERING INC. 32191 11/15/2021 7 JB TRAIL ATP 3 - PROGRESS PAYMENT #7 $444,968.96 Remit to: BEAUMONT, CA FYTD: $750,537.67

BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE
SERVICES, INC.
32307 11/29/2021 7581482 LANDSCAPE MAINT-ZONE 09 $25,191.06 11/29/2021 7553657 LANDSCAPE MAINT-ZONES D, M, S, 09, 01G, 01H, 01K & 02A Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $256,672.22

CALPINE CORPORATION DBA

CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES
32193 11/15/2021 79627 RESOURCE ADEQUACY-OCTOBER 2021/MV UTILITY $105,400.00 Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD: $527,000.00

CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES,
INC
32110 11/08/2021 63168 PLAN CHECK SVCS-ENCROACHMENT PERMITS $31,984.25 11/08/2021 63169 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN20-0063,65
11/08/2021 63170 PLAN CHECK SVCS-NPDES/SWMP-SEPTEMBER 2021 Remit to: MISSION VIEJO, CA FYTD: $148,198.66

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
CONTINENTAL EAST FUND III LLC 242524 11/08/2021 102941 REFUND-GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DEPOSIT/9A11-0025 & PA15-0028
$52,687.20
Remit to: MURRIETA, CA FYTD: $52,687.20
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SHERIFF 32197 11/15/2021 SH0000039606 CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT BILLING #2 (07/29-08/25/21) $2,918,139.69 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $16,045,496.89

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

AUDITOR- CONTROLLER
242571 11/22/2021 OCT 2021 TRANSMITTAL OF AB544 FROM PARKING CONTROL FEES $29,442.64 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $164,317.35

COURTYARDS AT COTTONWOOD,
L.P.
32114 11/08/2021 10 COURTYARDS AT COTTONWOOD DDA/AHA-SEPT 2021 $613,471.95 32310 11/29/2021 11 COURTYARDS AT COTTONWOOD DDA/AHA-OCT 2021 $432,718.01 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $1,920,521.81
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 32032 11/01/2021 39625 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW & IN HOUSE BUILDING SERVICES $46,973.25 11/01/2021 B211175 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
11/01/2021 B211376 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
Remit to: FOSTER CITY, CA FYTD: $146,606.14
DATA TICKET, INC. 32312 11/29/2021 128315 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS-CODE-JULY 2021 $40,493.94 11/29/2021 129652 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-ANIMAL SVC-SEPT 2021 11/29/2021 129653 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS-CODE-SEPT 2021 11/29/2021 130212 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-SEPT 2021 11/29/2021 128068 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-JULY 2021 Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $129,679.20

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CORP.
32313 11/29/2021 43366 SOFTWARE ASSURANCE/MAINTENANCE-11/29/21-12/28/21 $25,350.00 11/29/2021 43364 SOFTWARE ASSURANCE/MAINTENANCE-9/29/21-10/28/21 11/29/2021 43365 SOFTWARE ASSURANCE/MAINTENANCE-10/29/21-11/28/21 Remit to: SANTA CLARITA, CA FYTD: $27,990.00
EAGLE PUMP SERVICES, INC. 32035 11/01/2021 17022737 LANDSCAPE MAINT-ZONE 01 CIP $33,342.72 11/01/2021 17022736 LANDSCAPE MAINT-ZONE 01 CIP
Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD: $43,417.40

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER

DISTRICT
242438 11/01/2021 SEPT 21 11/01/21 WATER CHARGES $43,126.21 242496 11/08/2021 OCT 21 11/08/21 WATER CHARGES $163,510.66 11/08/2021 SEPT 21 11/08/21 WATER CHARGES
242572 11/22/2021 NOV 21 11/22/21 WATER CHARGES $159,414.29 11/22/2021 OCT 21 11/22/21 WATER CHARGES
11/22/2021 SEPT 21 11/22/21 WATER CHARGES
Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $1,213,686.98

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
32036 11/01/2021 0402-MF-02566 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $548,332.20 11/01/2021 0402-MF-02564 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 0402-MF-02561 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 0402-MF-02562 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 0402-MF-02546 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 0402-MF-02559 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 MVU-2021-44497 DISTRIBUTION CHARGES 9/14-10/15/21 11/01/2021 0402-MF-02565 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/01/2021 0402-MF-02563 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
32203 11/15/2021 C21-08 PERRIS NORTH OF IRIS-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT $102,304.21 11/15/2021 40-501-2109 WA# 40-501-ACQUIRED SCE STREETLIGHT MAINT 11/15/2021 40-481A-04 WA# 40-481A-EMWD WELL SITE 208
11/15/2021 C21-36 LASSELLE ST.-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT
11/15/2021 C21-26 PERRIS AND ABBEY-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT 11/15/2021 40-501-2110 WA# 40-501 ACQUIRED SCE STREETLIGHT MAINT 11/15/2021 40-486-01 WA# 40-486-ITRON FIELD HARDWARE INSTALLATIONCOMISSIONING 11/15/2021 40-433A-11 WA# 40-433A-PAMA BUSINESS PARK
11/15/2021 C21-33 LASSELLE ST.-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT
11/15/2021 C21-31 13400 KITCHING-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT 11/15/2021 40-454B-07 WA# 40-454B-MORENO VALLEY LOGISTICS CENTER BLDG 4 11/15/2021 40-470B-01 WA# 40-470B-CLARION CARDINAL TRUCK TERMINAL 11/15/2021 40-463B-01 WA# 40-463B-LDC NANDINA INDUSTRIAL 11/15/2021 40-482A-03 WA# 40-482A-ASPEN HILLS 112 UNITS-TR32142 11/15/2021 40-459B-03 WA# 40-459-S61 PME GS RECONFIGURATION 11/15/2021 40-483A-01 WA# 40-483A-APOLLO IV APARTMENTS-49 UNITS 11/15/2021 40-474A-07 WA# 40-474A-KB HOMES-MOOTHART 80 HOMES 11/15/2021 40-461A-09 WA# 40-461A-MORENO VALLEY MAJESTIC-8 SFR 11/15/2021 40-478A-05 WA# 40-478A-COURTYARDS AT COTTONWOOD STREETLIGHTS 11/15/2021 40-472A-06 WA# 40-472A-IRIS TOWNHOMES 52 UNITS 11/15/2021 40-462A-04 WA# 40-462A-HEMLOCK GARDEN APTS STREETLIGHT 11/15/2021 40-439A-08 WA# 40-439A-VIA DEL LAGO
11/15/2021 40-450B-12 WA# 40-450B-HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW CORPORATE PARK PH 2 11/15/2021 40-438B-14 WA# 40-438B-CENTURY COMMUNITIES
11/15/2021 40-480-05 40-480-CITY FIBER INSTALLATION PROJECT 11/15/2021 0402-MF-02576 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
32203 11/15/2021 C21-06B SUNNYMEAD BLVD-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT Payment Amount
11/15/2021 40-426B-04 WA# 40-426B-EMWD EUCALYPTUS BOOSTER STATION 11/15/2021 40-373B-16 WA# 40-373B-CACTUS COMMERCE, LP
11/15/2021 0402-MF-02577 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/15/2021 40-460A-10 WA# 40-460A-DR HORTON DEL SOL TRACT 31590-96 HOMES 11/15/2021 MFP-2021-44508 METER FEES-REGULAR
11/15/2021 40-484A-01 WA# 40-484A-IRIS PARK 81 UNITS-TR 37909 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $3,617,107.89

ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS

CONSULTING, LLC
32204 11/15/2021 MVU-2021-11 CONSULTING SVCS-MV UTILITIES $84,787.63 Remit to: WEBSTER, NY FYTD: $243,058.73

EXELON GENERATION COMPANY,
LLC
32121 11/08/2021 761092 POWER PURCHASE 10/1-10/31/21 $721,594.24 Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD: $4,299,898.00

FALCON ENGINEERING SERVICES,
INC.
32205 11/15/2021 2021-06 SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC PHASE 2 $165,551.93 Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD: $416,090.59
GRANICUS, LLC. 32316 11/29/2021 145257 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION-LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT-12/1/21- 11/30/22
$57,771.00
Remit to: SAINT PAUL, MN FYTD: $57,771.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
IE GENERAL ENGINEERING INC 32044 11/01/2021 1 CORPORATE YARD MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS $140,843.44 Remit to: BEAUMONT, CA FYTD: $159,968.44
ITRON, INC. 32254 11/22/2021 603572 AMI COLLECTORS SYSTEM $38,450.00 Remit to: LIBERTY LAKE, WA FYTD: $76,016.48

LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES,
LLC
32048 11/01/2021 INV4676 LIBRARY CONTRACT SVCS & MATERIALS-MAIN & MALL-NOV 2021 $197,447.84 Remit to: ROCKVILLE, MD FYTD: $1,016,508.18
LYONS SECURITY SERVICE, INC. 32134 11/08/2021 29130 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-EMPLOYEE RESOURCE CTR.-OCT 2021- COVID
$26,716.56
11/08/2021 29126 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-COMMUNITY PARK-OCT 2021 11/08/2021 29133 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-TOWNGATE-OCT 2021
11/08/2021 29131 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-LIBRARY-OCT 21
11/08/2021 29129 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CONF & REC CTR SPECIAL EVENT-OCT 2021
11/08/2021 29127 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-COTTONWOOD GOLF SPECIAL EVENTOCT 21 11/08/2021 29125 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CITY HALL-OCT 2021 11/08/2021 29132 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-SENIOR CENTER-OCT 2021 11/08/2021 29128 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CONF & REC CTR-OCT 2021 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $122,733.84

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

MERCHANTS BUILDING
MAINTENANCE, LLC.
32262 11/22/2021 648309 DAY PORTER SERVICES FOR ENHANCED COVID-19 CLEANINGOCT. 2021$61,677.59 11/22/2021 648375 COMMUNITY PARK RESTROOMS DAY PORTER SERVICES-OCT. 2021
11/22/2021 648376 OCT 2021 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-CONF. & REC. CENTER
11/22/2021 648377 OCT 2021 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALSCOTTONWOOD GOLF CTR 11/22/2021 648378 OCT 2021 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-TOWNGATE COMM. CTR.
11/22/2021 648308 CITY-WIDE ROUTINE JANITORIAL SERVICES - OCT. 2021 Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD: $350,504.94
MERIDIAN PARK K-4 LLC 242462 11/01/2021 142850 REFUND-DEPOSIT BALANCE-OT INSPECTIONS/LC021-0030 (PEN19-0106)
$26,520.00
Remit to: UPLAND, CA FYTD: $26,520.00
MORENO VALLEY UTILITY 242442 11/01/2021 NOV-21 11/1/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR PERIOD 9/14-10/15/21 $100,085.72 Remit to: HEMET, CA FYTD: $543,677.08
MOSS BROS. AUTOGROUP 242443 11/01/2021 CONTRACT # 86297 2022 RAM 2500 COMMERCIAL ENF. TRUCKVIN#3C6UR5DLXNG131701$77,324.59 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $77,324.59

NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL
HOLDINGS INC.
242576 11/22/2021 674846 RENEWABLE ENERGY-MV UTILITY-OCT. 2021 $27,559.22 Remit to: JUNO BEACH, FL FYTD: $159,557.43

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
ORACLE AMERICA 32055 11/01/2021 100022131 ORACLE UTILITIES CUSTOMER CLOUD SERVICES $75,389.74 11/01/2021 100027585 ORACLE CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE-OBJECT STORAGE SERVICES 32265 11/22/2021 100055626 ORACLE UTILITIES CUSTOMER CLOUD SERVICES 8/14-11/13/21 $75,411.95 Remit to: REDWOOD SHORES, CA FYTD: $150,801.69

PERMITROCKET SOFTWARE LLC

DBA EPERMITHUB
32219 11/15/2021 2305 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 4/1/21-3/31/22 $59,070.82 Remit to: MIAMI, FL FYTD: $81,070.82
RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 32222 11/15/2021 2021_11_RE AST 2 RENEWABLE ENERGY-MV UTILITY-OCT 2021 $29,393.91 Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD: $184,567.39

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 242451 11/01/2021 7501321746 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/IRIS AVE.-SEP. 2021 $62,364.18 11/01/2021 7501321749 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/NANDINA AVE.-SEP. 2021 11/01/2021 7501321751 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/SUBSTATION 115KV INTERCONNECTIONSEP. 2021 11/01/2021 7501321747 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GRAHAM ST.-SEP. 2021 11/01/2021 7501321748 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GLOBE ST.-SEP. 2021 11/01/2021 7501321750 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/FREDERICK AVE.-SEP. 2021 11/01/2021 7501321754 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/24417 NANDINA AVE. SUBSTATION-SEP. 2021
11/01/2021 7501321728 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/17160 KITCHING ST. SUBSTATION-SEP. 2021
242512 11/08/2021 395913224/SEP-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $77,152.62 11/08/2021 355556776/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS 11/08/2021 282492235/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY-FERC CHARGES/MVU 11/08/2021 431591238/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS 11/08/2021 OCT-21 11/8/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES
11/08/2021 570511709/OCT-21 IFA CHARGES-SUBSTATION
11/08/2021 559238386/OCT-21 IFA & DISTRIBUTION UPGRADE CHARGES-KITCHING SUBSTATION 11/08/2021 498683714/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS 11/08/2021 435293103/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ADDED STREETLIGHTS 11/08/2021 433869021/OCT-21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ADDED STREETLIGHTS

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 242615 11/29/2021 7501325605 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/17160 KITCHING ST. SUBSTATION-OCT. 2021
$49,122.48
11/29/2021 7501325628 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/SUBSTATION 115KV INTERCONNECTIONOCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325627 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/FREDERICK AVE.-OCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325625 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GLOBE ST.-OCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325626 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/NANDINA AVE.-OCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325623 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/IRIS AVE.-OCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325624 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GRAHAM ST.-OCT. 2021 11/29/2021 7501325631 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/24417 NANDINA AVE. SUBSTATION-OCT. 2021
Remit to: ROSEMEAD, CA FYTD: $855,566.65

SPECTRUM CONSTRUCTION
GROUP INC.
32060 11/01/2021 101 $69,301.31
32225 11/15/2021 3
CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHAB FY20/21
SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC PHASE 2 $871,217.96
Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $1,749,414.81
SYNERGY COMPANIES 242583 11/22/2021 MVU RES DI 10-21 ENERGY AUDITS & INSTALLATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES-OCT21
$48,425.31
Remit to: HAYWARD, CA FYTD: $199,158.85
TENASKA ENERGY, INC 32227 11/15/2021 MOREN00053780029 RENEWABLE ENERGY-MV UTILITY $35,308.00 Remit to: ARLINGTON, TX FYTD: $2,140,087.63

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

THE ADVANTAGE GROUP/ FLEX

ADVANTAGE
32063 11/01/2021 202111 NOVEMBER 2021 RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFIT BILLING $46,058.15 Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD: $239,744.59
U.S. BANK NA 32096 11/04/2021 W211103 FUND TRANFER FROM LAIF TO US BANK $10,000,000.00 Remit to: ST. PAUL, MN FYTD: $10,001,875.00
U.S. BANK/CALCARDS 32065 11/01/2021 10-27-21 OCTOBER 2021 CALCARD ACTIVITY $250,161.50 Remit to: ST. LOUIS, MO FYTD: $1,252,715.85
WASTE MANAGEMENT 242519 11/08/2021 110321 SOLID WASTE DELINQUENCIES PASS THRU, LESS FRANCHISE FEES $50,426.69 Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD: $76,013.14
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 32070 11/01/2021 002-24889 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BLDG. & SAFETY DEPT.- JUL21
$146,951.75
11/01/2021 002-25012 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BLDG. & SAFETY DEPT.- AUG21
11/01/2021 002-25265 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BLDG. & SAFETY DEPT.- SEP21
Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $289,826.99
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 32071 11/01/2021 010-49263 CARES ACT GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2021 $31,982.50 11/01/2021 010-49264 GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2021 Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD: $138,804.18
WILMINGTON TRUST 32240 11/09/2021 W211102 2020 TRIP REFUND INTEREST DEC 2021 $218,397.68 Remit to: WILMINGTON, DE FYTD: $221,397.68

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
WRCRCA 32171 11/08/2021 OCT-2021 MSHCP MSHCP FEES COLLECTED FOR OCT. 2021-RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
$52,830.00
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $593,113.32
TOTAL AMOUNTS OF $25,000 OR GREATER $20,154,870.37

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
ABULARACH, VICTOR HUGO 242586 11/22/2021 C25993 REFUND-ADMIN CITATION-VIOLATION DISMISSED $2,000.00 Remit to: VISALIA, CA FYTD: $2,000.00
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL LLC 32099 11/08/2021 107338 MONTHLY K-9 TRAINING (RICO) OCT 2021 $175.00 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $875.00
ADMINSURE 32300 11/29/2021 14644 WORKERS' COMP CLAIM ADMIN-DEC 2021 $2,369.00 Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD: $14,214.00

ADOPT A HIGHWAY LITTER

REMOVAL SERVICE OF AMERICA
32241 11/22/2021 202259 $1,144.00
11/22/2021 200791
11/22/2021 200790
11/22/2021 200789
32301 11/29/2021 202515 $1,144.00
11/29/2021 202549
11/29/2021 202550
11/29/2021 202551
LITTER REMOVAL-HWY 60 WB

LITTER REMOVAL-NORTH PERRIS/ALESSANDRO

LITTER REMOVAL-SOUTHBOUND PIGEON PASS/

LITTER REMOVAL-COUGAR CANYON NORTH

LITTER REMOVAL-HEACOCK/ATWOOD
LITTER REMOVAL-HWY 60 WB

LITTER REMOVAL-NORTH HEACOCK/ATWOOD

LITTER REMOVAL-SOUTHBND PIGEON PASS/ALESS

LITTER REMOVAL-NORTH PERRIS/ALESSANDRO
Remit to: ENCINITAS, CA FYTD: $5,720.00

ADVANCE REFRIGERATION & ICE

SYSTEMS, INC
32026 11/01/2021 51222 ICE MACHINE MAINT & WATER FILTER-FIRE STATION 65 $149.00 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $8,620.83

ADVANTAGE GRAPHICS AND

PROMOTIONS
32100 11/08/2021 14767 NOTICE OF PARKING VIOLATIONS-PD $2,085.35 Remit to: DANA POINT, CA FYTD: $3,492.62

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
AIR EXCHANGE INC 32187 11/15/2021 91605885 PLYMOVENT MAINT & REPAIR-FIRE STATIONS $1,271.24 Remit to: FAIRFIELD, CA FYTD: $2,797.05
AIRESPRING INC. 32188 11/15/2021 154075142 LOCAL/LONG DISTANCE CALLS & INTERNET SVC-NOV 21 $2,798.44 Remit to: VAN NUYS, CA FYTD: $14,025.73
ALALI, HOWAIDA 242459 11/01/2021 R21-157130 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $75.00
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES 32302 11/29/2021 214004 PROF. SVCS-SUNNYMEAD MDP LINE B-16A $11,421.16 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $24,672.90

ALFARO COMMUNICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
32242 11/22/2021 Final - RET RETENTION RELEASE-SOUTH LASSELLE STREET SAFETY

CORRIDOR
$16,371.80
Remit to: COMPTON, CA FYTD: $327,436.00

ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES,
INC.
32303 11/29/2021 3RD QTR-CY2021 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE (JULY-SEPT 2021 PREMIUMS) $6,615.00 Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD: $9,469.00
ALTAMIRANO, EMMANUEL 32101 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242470 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 32027 11/01/2021 75025 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $305.00 11/01/2021 75044 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
32102 11/08/2021 75076 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $1,025.00
32189 11/15/2021 75155 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $55.00
32243 11/22/2021 75204 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $1,634.49
11/22/2021 75198 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
11/22/2021 75184 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
11/22/2021 75183 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
11/22/2021 75182 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
11/22/2021 75197 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
32304 11/29/2021 75250 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $645.59
11/29/2021 75233 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
Remit to: LA QUINTA, CA FYTD: $13,310.08
ANDREWS, JEFFERY 242621 11/29/2021 12/5 -12/10/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM-CELLEBRITE CERT. OPERATOR/PHYS. ANALYST

TRAINING
$379.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $672.13

ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC.
32103 11/08/2021 637738 PEST MANAGMENT SERVICE-MV UTILITY-OCT 2021 $1,965.20 11/08/2021 635413 PEST MANAGEMENT SERVICE-PARKS-OCT 2021 Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD: $12,691.76

APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT

SERVICES
32305 11/29/2021 S8792195 OFFICE ASSISTANT-9/29-10/22/21-M. DAVIS $2,700.00 Remit to: GLENDALE, CA FYTD: $28,517.67
ARTEAGA, JESSICA 242460 11/01/2021 R21-158076 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 Remit to: LAKE ELSINORE, CA FYTD: $75.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

AUTOMATIC STOREFRONT

SERVICE/E-Z AUTOMATED

SYSTEMS
242434 11/01/2021 0031481 SLIDING GLASS DOOR REPAIR- CONF. & REC CTR $792.00 11/01/2021 0031480 SLIDING GLASS DOOR PREV MAINT-LIBRARY 11/01/2021 0031479 SLIDING GLASS DOOR PREV MAINT-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER
242487 11/08/2021 0031485 SLIDING GLASS DOOR PREV MAINT-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. $1,056.00 Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD: $22,119.16
AVANT GARDE 32028 11/01/2021 7258 HOME PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-SEPT 2021 $833.75 11/01/2021 7260 CDBG HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-SEPT 2021
11/01/2021 7259 HOME HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-SEPT 2021
Remit to: POMONA, CA FYTD: $11,967.50
B & G Sheet Metal 242522 11/08/2021 BL#13729-YR2021 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT FOR BL # 13729 $45.05 Remit to: TEMPLE CITY, CA FYTD: $45.05

BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE,
LLP
32104 11/08/2021 BT939821 CONSULTING SVCS-MV UTILITIES $1,778.75 Remit to: MADISON, WI FYTD: $2,382.50
BELECHE, MOISES 32105 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242484 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
BELL, NORMA 242561 11/15/2021 2002355.047 TOWNGATE COMM. CTR. RENTAL REFUND $10.40 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $10.40

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
BERMUDEZ, KATHERINE 242456 11/01/2021 11/9 - 11/12/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - ICI ADVANCED CHILD ABUSE - PHYSICAL

TRAINING
$231.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $231.25
BEST, NICK 242587 11/22/2021 R21-159511 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-DUPLICATE WEB LICENSE PAYMENT $15.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $15.00
BIO-TOX LABORATORIES, INC. 242435 11/01/2021 41885 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD $8,154.00 11/01/2021 41852 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 11/01/2021 41851 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 242604 11/29/2021 42022 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD $9,436.00 11/29/2021 42023 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $48,075.00
BLUE OUTDOOR LLC 32106 11/08/2021 2021-10-7884 MALL ADVERTISEMENT $400.00 Remit to: NEW YORK, NY FYTD: $400.00

BMW MOTORCYCLES OF

RIVERSIDE
32107 11/08/2021 6028715 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $541.47 11/08/2021 6028689 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
32190 11/15/2021 6028760 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $946.90 11/15/2021 6028739 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
32244 11/22/2021 6028783 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $378.19 32306 11/29/2021 6028813 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $2,366.78 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $20,930.43

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

BOX SPRINGS MUTUAL WATER

COMPANY
242436 11/01/2021 189-13 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
$553.61
11/01/2021 195-5 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 1084-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 331-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 1086-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 1085-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 1087-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 45-4 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 36-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 721-1 10/25/21 WATER USAGE-TOWNGATE-OCT 2021 11/01/2021 204-9 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 80-4 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
11/01/2021 1088-1 10/25/21 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $2,359.54

BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE,
P.C.
32029 11/01/2021 19977 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY-SEPT 2021 $475.16 Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $2,611.47

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

BRIDGEPAY NETWORK

SOLUTIONS
32192 11/15/2021 8815 CREDIT CARD GATEWAY SVCS-NOV 2021 $19.40 Remit to: ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL FYTD: $102.00
CALABRESE, DARIO 32108 11/08/2021 145 UNMANNED DRONE TRAINING-FAA PART 107 TEST PREP COURSEE BECHTOLD$1,000.00 Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD: $1,000.00

CALBO-CALIFORNIA BUILDING

OFFICIALS
242489 11/08/2021 14751 TRAINING REGISTRATION FEES $2,730.00 Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $2,730.00
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF TAX AND

FEE ADMINISTRATION
242490 11/08/2021 3RD QTR 2021 $18,875.00
242605 11/29/2021 3RD QTR 2021-FEE
ELECTRICAL ENERGY SURCHARGE RETURN/JUL-SEP 2021/ACCT#
31-000177
ELECTRICAL ENERGY SURCHARGE RETURN JUN-SEPT 2021/
ACCT#031-000177
$1,981.88
Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $35,314.81

CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS

PARTNERSHIP
242491 11/08/2021 0011481124 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-PEN20-118-0122 $1,427.20 11/08/2021 0011486987 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-PEN19-0003 11/08/2021 0011489644 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-PEN20-00118-0122 11/08/2021 0011486989 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-PEN21-0084 11/08/2021 0011486984 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-PEN19-0096 & 98 & PEN20-0077
Remit to: WILLOUGHBY, OH FYTD: $3,178.60

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CAMERON-DANIEL, P.C. 32030 11/01/2021 1251 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY $1,650.00 32194 11/15/2021 1256 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY $825.00 Remit to: SEBASTOPOL, CA FYTD: $18,012.50

CANNON CORPORATION DBA
PENCO
32245 11/22/2021 78415 $127.80
32308 11/29/2021 78501

ENGINEERING SVCS-SOUTH LASSELLE STREET SAFETY

CORRIDOR

ENGINEERING SVCS-SOUTH LASSELLE STREET SAFETY
CORRIDOR $438.97
Remit to: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA FYTD: $13,051.27

CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION
242492 11/08/2021 IN1046103 EVOLVE 365 END USER ADOPTION & TRAINING-FY 21/22 $12,478.54 Remit to: RESTON, VA FYTD: $12,478.54

CASTILLO-GARCIA, MICHAEL
JORRIS
242539 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

CHANDLER ASSET

MANAGEMENT, INC
32109 11/08/2021 2110MORENOVA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SVCS-OCT 2021 $7,840.11 Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD: $37,949.16
CHAVEZ, DAMIAN 242520 11/08/2021 11/18 - 11/23/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - CNOA TRAINING INSTITUTE & LAW

ENFORCEMENT EXPO
$338.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $338.25
CHAVEZ, MARCIANA 242523 11/08/2021 141703 REFUND-LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEES/LGL21-0045 $1,168.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $1,168.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

CHRIS ALAN VOGT DBA CAV

CONSULTING
32111 11/08/2021 21006 SENIOR ENGINEER CONSULTING SERVICES (LDD) $21,727.50 11/08/2021 21005 PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTING SERVICES (CPD) Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $30,582.50
CINDY MENDEZ DBA REEL BAND 242531 11/08/2021 10/29/21 DOD "DREAMING OF YOU"-SELENA TRIBUTE BAND-DAY OF THE DEAD EVENT
$2,300.00
Remit to: SAN GABRIEL, CA FYTD: $2,300.00
CIVIC SOLUTIONS, INC 32309 11/29/2021 103121 PLANNING ENTITLEMENT AND PLAN CHECK SVCS $1,818.38 Remit to: MISSION VIEJO, CA FYTD: $24,566.40
CLARITAS HOLDINGS, INC. DBA

CLARITAS, LLC
32031 11/01/2021 2712529 ADVERTISEMENT-2021 SPOTLIGHT RENEWAL $1,495.00 Remit to: CINCINNATI, OH FYTD: $1,495.00

COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH &

WHATLEY, PC
242437 11/01/2021 49448 UNDER COLLECTION OF UTILITY USER TAXES $545.62 Remit to: GRASS VALLEY, CA FYTD: $3,574.56

COLONIAL SUPPLEMENTAL

INSURANCE
242493 11/08/2021 71330691101483 EMPLOYEE SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE $7,118.37 Remit to: COLUMBIA, SC FYTD: $36,025.85
CONTINENTAL EAST FUND III, LLC 242525 11/08/2021 BL#35785-YR2021 REFUND OF GOOD FAITH LICENSE DEPOSIT $4,000.00 Remit to: MURRIETA, CA FYTD: $4,000.00
CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC. 32195 11/15/2021 DS1299198 OFF-SITE MEDIA STORAGE-OCTOBER 2021 $395.53 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $2,040.37

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

CORODATA RECORDS
MANAGEMENT, INC.
32196 11/15/2021 RS4743530 RECORDS STORAGE-OCT 2021 $1,005.19 Remit to: POWAY, CA FYTD: $5,097.64

COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION,
INC
32112 11/08/2021 114866057-1 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DATABASE SVC-NOV 2021 $1,500.63 Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD: $7,503.15
COUNSELING TEAM, THE 242494 11/08/2021 80434 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM-SEPT 2021 $1,667.00 242606 11/29/2021 80634 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM-OCT 2021 $1,667.00 Remit to: SAN BERNARDINO, CA FYTD: $8,335.00
COUNTRY SQUIRE ESTATES 242495 11/08/2021 OCT-SEPT 2021 UUT REFUND $13.77 Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD: $112.62
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 32113 11/08/2021 IT0000004987 TRAFFIC MOTOR COMMUNICATIONS-PD $674.76 242544 11/15/2021 21-538715 RECORDATION DOCUMENT $52.00 242545 11/15/2021 21-426113 RECORDATION DOCUMENT $87.00 242570 11/22/2021 PE0000000078 APX 7500M DUAL BAND, HPD MODEM MAINT $4,903.30 11/22/2021 PE0000000051 APX 7500M DUAL BAND, HPD MODEM MAINT Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $209,244.85
CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN, LLC 32198 11/15/2021 42298 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $850.00 32246 11/22/2021 42306 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $200.00 32311 11/29/2021 42323 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $850.00 Remit to: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FYTD: $8,050.00
CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC 32115 11/08/2021 975052 INTERNET SVCS 11/01-11/30/2021 $1,250.00 Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD: $6,250.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CWE CORP. 32033 11/01/2021 21744 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PWQMP-JULY 2021 $1,456.00 Remit to: FULLERTON, CA FYTD: $9,945.00
DATA TICKET, INC. 32199 11/15/2021 129654 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-PD-SEPT 2021 $608.60 Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $129,679.20
DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 32200 11/15/2021 498130 ENGINEERING SVCS-SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC PHASE 2 $11,783.50 Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $43,178.50
DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 32116 11/08/2021 BE004661051 EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE-PPO $13,192.05 Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD: $68,859.42
DELTACARE USA 32117 11/08/2021 BE004661890 EMPLOYEE DENTAL INSURANCE-HMO $4,149.59 Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD: $20,832.17

DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
242568 11/15/2021 22004067 INITIAL DEPOSIT-SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC FOR DEPT

FURNISHED MATERIALS
$10,000.00
Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $10,151.93

DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CORP.
32201 11/15/2021 43210 CONSULTING SERVICES-PROGRAMMING, IMPLEMENTATION & DESIGN
$2,640.00
Remit to: SANTA CLARITA, CA FYTD: $27,990.00

DISCOVERY CHRISITIAN CHURCH

OF MORENO VALLEY
242559 11/15/2021 NOVEMBER 22,2021 CONTRIBUTION-THANKSGIVING MEAL DISTRIBUTION $1,000.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $1,000.00
DISH DBS CORPORATION 242546 11/15/2021 86557282/NOV21 SATELLITE TV-FIRE STATION 99-010/30-11/30/21 $140.37 Remit to: PALATINE, IL FYTD: $728.02

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
DOMINGUEZ MEDRANO, GABRIEL 242536 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
E.R. BLOCK PLUMBING &
HEATING, INC.
32034 11/01/2021 135508 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-ZONE D $471.88 32118 11/08/2021 135487 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER $75.00 11/08/2021 135486 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-CITY HALL
32202 11/15/2021 135507 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-ZONES D, E-7, 01, 01A & WQB $275.00 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $7,748.13

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER

DISTRICT
242547 11/15/2021 OCT-21 11/15/21 WATER CHARGES $14,509.11 11/15/2021 SEPT-21 11/15/21 WATER CHARGES
242607 11/29/2021 NOV-21 11/29/21 WATER CHARGES $13,835.94 11/29/2021 OCT-21 11/29/21 WATER CHARGES
Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD: $1,213,686.98
EDA/WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 242588 11/22/2021 2002363.047 CONFERENCE & REC.CTR. RENTAL REFUND $524.10 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $524.10
EDWARDS, CRYSTAL 32119 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242465 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC, INC. 32247 11/22/2021 14-0495-004 RET RETENTION RELEASE-UPGRADE EXISTING MARKED CROSSWALKS PROJ $14,490.00 Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD: $478,997.48

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

EMERGENT BATTERY
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
32248 11/22/2021 39568 REPLACEMENT BATTERIES (60) FOR BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS $8,728.75 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $26,541.30

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT
32429 11/15/2021 3RD QTR 2021 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CLAIMS 07/01/21-09/30/21 $7,289.58 Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $15,046.27

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
32120 11/08/2021 0402-MF-02567 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $264.00 32249 11/22/2021 0402-MF-02583 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $528.00 11/22/2021 0402-MF-02579 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
32314 11/29/2021 0402-MF-02585 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $13,567.23 11/29/2021 C21-34 CANYON VISTA RD & COUNTRY CANYON RD-VEHICLE HIT

STREETLIGHT
11/29/2021 0402-MF-02587 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/29/2021 0402-MF-02584 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
11/29/2021 C21-28 IRIS AND OLIVER-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT 11/29/2021 C21-39 EAST SIDE OF PERRIS-NORTH JFK-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $3,617,107.89
ENGIE SERVICES U.S. INC. 32037 11/01/2021 90032851 MONITORING SERVICE AGREEMENT $874.18 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $874.18
EXCLUSIVE TOWING 242439 11/01/2021 21-14266 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING $1,012.50 11/01/2021 21-14223 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
11/01/2021 21-14216 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $3,354.70

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, INC.
32122 11/08/2021 AUG-21 (FH) FAIR HOUSING DISCRIMINATION SVCS-CDBG $3,139.74 32186 11/08/2021 AUG-21 (LT) LANDLORD/TENANT MEDIATION SVCS-CDBG $1,569.66 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $17,732.65
FAST SIGNS 242497 11/08/2021 70-42617 ENGRAVED MATERIAL WITH VINYL $88.90 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $5,145.56
FERRELLGAS LP 242498 11/08/2021 1116728501 PROPANE-CITY YARD $336.17 Remit to: DENVER, CO FYTD: $2,097.78
FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE, LLC 242499 11/08/2021 20027761021 ONLINE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION-OCT 21 $99.00 Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $496.30

FRIENDS OF THE MV SENIOR
CENTER
32038 11/01/2021 0821 MOVAN SENIOR MOVAN PROGRAM-CDBG REIMBURSEMENT $13,644.00 32123 11/08/2021 0921 MOVAN SENIOR MOVAN PROGRAM-CDBG REIMBURSEMENT $13,062.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $36,985.33

FRONTIER

COMMUNICATIONS/FORMERLY

VERIZON
32315 11/29/2021 7002Z173-S-21309 BACKBONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 11/5-12/4/21 $1,607.08 Remit to: ROCHESTER, NY FYTD: $8,136.26

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

FRONTIER

COMMUNICATIONS/FORMERLY
VERIZON CALIF.
242440 11/01/2021 081095-5/OCT21 FOREIGN EXCHANGE BUS LISTING-MV UTILITY $7.67 242548 11/15/2021 062221-5/NOV21 COMMUNICATION SVCS-10/28-11/27/21 $1,190.00 242573 11/22/2021 081095-5/NOV21 FOREIGN EXCHANGE BUS LISTING-MV UTILITY $7.67 Remit to: CINCINNATI, OH FYTD: $6,291.23
FUEL PROS, INC 32039 11/01/2021 0000058186 FUEL TANK REPAIR-CITY YARD $1,134.18 32124 11/08/2021 0000058707 FUEL TANK REPAIR-CITY YARD $1,092.50 Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD: $2,226.68
GALLS INC., INLAND UNIFORM 32250 11/22/2021 OR19256907 UNIFORMS FOR PARK RANGERS $1,502.37 Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD: $1,692.58
GDS ASSOCIATES, INC. 32040 11/01/2021 0199129 ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY-MV UTILITY $5,810.00 32251 11/22/2021 0200132 ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY-MV UTILITY $4,255.00 Remit to: MARIETTA, GA FYTD: $11,445.00
GIL, IRENE ANITA 32125 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242476 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
GIORDANI, HEATHER 242562 11/15/2021 R21-159484 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 Remit to: COSTA MESA, CA FYTD: $75.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
GIRON, BERNARDO 32126 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242486 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

GLOBAL AUTOMATION SERVICES,
INC.
242500 11/08/2021 36597 HVAC TROUBLESHOOT-EMERGENCY OP'S CTR $495.00 Remit to: YUCAIPA, CA FYTD: $495.00
GOMEZ, ABRAHAM ZAMBRANO 32127 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242483 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
GOMEZ, HILDA 242563 11/15/2021 2002359-60.047 COTTONWOOD GOLF CTR. RENTAL REFUND $319.60 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $319.60
GONZALEZ, YAMILET 242543 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
GRAINGER, ELIZABETH 242598 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
GRAVES & KING, LLP 32041 11/01/2021 2109-0010166-05 LEGAL SERVICES-CLAIM MV 0010166-INRI TOWING $4,031.00 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $52,697.95

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
GREENROCK MATERIALS, LLC 242608 11/29/2021 10269 ASPHALT DUMP FEES $196.54 Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD: $1,898.79
GREENTECH LANDSCAPE, INC. 32128 11/08/2021 51972 LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARKS $23,186.00 11/08/2021 52169 LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARKS
Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $245,232.05
GUTIERREZ, ITZIA 242597 11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

RIVERSIDE
32042 11/01/2021 MHR1920-21 MOBILE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM-SEPT 2021 $4,457.01 11/01/2021 MHR1920-20 MOBILE HOME REPAIR PROGRAM-AUG 2021 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $206,234.20

HASCO HEATING AIR

CONDITIONING SERVICE

COMPANY
32043 11/01/2021 98498 HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS-MARCH ANNEX $643.95 32206 11/15/2021 99508 HVAC REPAIR-MARCH ANNEX $359.56
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $46,547.35
HDL COREN & CONE 242501 11/08/2021 SIN012206 CONTRACT SVCS-PROPERTY TAX SOFTWARE MAINT (OCT-DEC 2021)
$5,971.76
Remit to: BREA, CA FYTD: $12,917.02

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

HERC RENTALS INC/ HERTZ

EQUIPMENT RENTAL
32129 11/08/2021 32451982-001 HEAVY EQUIP RENTAL-STORM PREP $744.65 Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD: $1,013.09
HF&H CONSULTANTS, LLC 32130 11/08/2021 9718658 2021-2022 SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENT ANALYSIS $940.00 Remit to: WALNUT CREEK, CA FYTD: $9,215.00
HLP, INC. 32252 11/22/2021 20487 WEB LICENSE MONTHLY SVC FEE $164.50 11/22/2021 20627 WEB LICENSE MONTHLY SVC FEE
Remit to: LITTLETON, CO FYTD: $32,230.80
HOPKINS-WARD, LISA 242461 11/01/2021 R21-159103 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSITS FOR 2

KITTENS
$150.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $150.00
HOSSAIN, FATEMA K 242535 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
HR GREEN PACIFIC INC. 32207 11/15/2021 147605 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES $9,550.00 Remit to: DES MOINES, IA FYTD: $79,146.28
HYUNDAI OF MORENO VALLEY 242560 11/15/2021 2ND QTR 2021 YEAR 4-QTR 2 TAX PAYMENT PER OPERATING COVENANT

AGREEMENT
$6,006.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $6,006.00
IE GENERAL ENGINEERING INC 32131 11/08/2021 10153 CONDUIT EXTENTSION-CORPORATE YARD $19,125.00 Remit to: BEAUMONT, CA FYTD: $159,968.44

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY

SERVICE, INC
32132 11/08/2021 21280 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS-FIRE PREVENTION-APN 304-240-004 $427.50 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $120,270.15

INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR

COMPANY
32045 11/01/2021 47089 GATE SENSING EDGE REPAIR-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. $1,245.95 11/01/2021 46791 GATE REPAIR-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
32133 11/08/2021 47413 ROLL UP DOOR REPAIR-FIRE STATION 6 $899.00 11/08/2021 47532 ROLL UP DOOR REPAIR-CITY YARD
Remit to: COLTON, CA FYTD: $8,271.95
INTERPRETERS UNLIMITED 32208 11/15/2021 283741 LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION SERVICES $42.00 32253 11/22/2021 290540 LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION SERVICES $156.00 Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD: $594.00
INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP 32209 11/15/2021 72467 PLAN CHECK SVCS-VIA DEL LAGO $1,120.00 11/15/2021 72946 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN19-0168
11/15/2021 72468 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN19-0168
11/15/2021 72945 PLAN CHECK SVCS-VIA DEL LAGO
Remit to: BOULDER, CO FYTD: $14,371.50
IRIS PARTNERS, LLC 32046 11/01/2021 NOVEMBER 2021 LEASE PAYMENT-LIBRARY-NOVEMBER 2021 $11,666.67 Remit to: UPLAND, CA FYTD: $46,666.68
ISLAM, ZOHORA 242534 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
JACQUEZ-NARES, PAT 242502 11/08/2021 OCT 15, 2021 FLOWERS-MAYOR PRO TEM MEMORIAL SERVICE $242.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $242.00
JEFFERSON, ANEICA IRENE 242533 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
JONES BEY, JAMIE R 242599 11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 32047 11/01/2021 109572 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES $6,141.75 Remit to: ORANGE, CA FYTD: $33,004.29
KAISER PERMANENTE 242526 11/08/2021 2002341.047 CONFERENCE & REC.CTR. RENTAL REFUND $524.10 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $524.10
KB HOME INLAND EMPIRE 242564 11/15/2021 108108 REFUND-BAL. FROM ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT/MVUSD CFD 2019-1JCFA
$9,912.39
Remit to: WILDOMAR, CA FYTD: $9,912.39
KOA CORPORATION 242609 11/29/2021 JC06061-11 PROFESSIONAL SVCS-ADVANCED DILEMMA ZONE DETECTION $10,807.06 Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD: $320,383.18

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS, USA
32210 11/15/2021 9008161600 COPIER USAGE-OCTOBER 2021 $296.14 32255 11/22/2021 38784147 COPIER LEASE-CITY WIDE $10,026.10 Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $51,877.13
LARIOS-LOPEZ, ALEXIS 242603 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
LEADING EDGE LEARNING CENTER 242574 11/22/2021 NOV. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-READING COMPREHENSION & WRITING CLASS
$112.00
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $989.60
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIESRIV CNTY DIV242503 11/08/2021 2523 LEAGUE DIVISION MEETING 9/22/21 $120.00 Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $120.00

LEXISNEXIS PRACTICE

MANAGEMENT
32211 11/15/2021 3093523088 LEGAL RESEARCH TOOLS-OCTOBER 2021 $883.20 Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD: $4,416.00
LEYVA, ROSA 32256 11/22/2021 NOV. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - CPR CLASS $64.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $384.00

LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES,
LLC
32257 11/22/2021 INV4754 VIRTUAL PROG GRANT-OCTOBER 2021 $4,902.86 11/22/2021 INV4710 LSTA COPYCAT GRANT-ANYTIME STORY-OCTOBER 2021 Remit to: ROCKVILLE, MD FYTD: $1,016,508.18

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
LIEBERT, CASSIDY, WHITMORE 242610 11/29/2021 206027 LEGAL SERVICES-MO140-00001 $305.00 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $489.00
LOPEZ, MARILYN 242538 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC. 32258 11/22/2021 18390 PROGRESS PYMT #1-CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHAB FY20/21 $145.00 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $145.00
LOWTHER, QUINN 242540 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
MAGELLAN ADVISORS, LLC. 32135 11/08/2021 MA10312120 FIBER CONSULTANT SERVICES $12,987.33 Remit to: MIAMI, FL FYTD: $51,949.32
MANCILLAS, ANGELICA 242542 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

MANDELL MUNICIPAL

COUNSELING
242504 11/08/2021 OCTOBER 2021 LEGAL SERVICES FOR SPECIAL FINANCING DISTRICTS $540.00 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $2,550.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

MARCH JOINT POWERS

AUTHORITY
242505 11/08/2021 55301 GAS CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BUILDING 938-SEP. 2021 $45.44 11/08/2021 55298 GAS CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BUILDING 823-SEP. 2021 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $269.06

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 32049 11/01/2021 94956 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-SEP21-ZONE 02/IRRIGATION REPAIRS $415.64

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 32136 11/08/2021 95213 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SENIOR CENTER-OCT. 2021 $24,697.70 11/08/2021 95221 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/FAY TO GENTIAN-OCT. 2021
11/08/2021 95209 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95219 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95210 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MORENO BEACH ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONOCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95217 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL ANNEX-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95216 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL-OCT. 2021
11/08/2021 95204 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT B-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95214 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-UTILITY FIELD OFFICE-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95218 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-VETERANS MEMORIAL-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95212 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95220 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-KITCHING ELECTRIC SUBSTATION-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95215 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-FIRE STATIONS 2, 6, 48, 58, 65, 91, & 99- OCT21
11/08/2021 95203 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT A-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95202 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PAN AM SECTION AQUEDUCT-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95222 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95208 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD-OCT. 2021
11/08/2021 95207 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MARCH ANNEX BUILDING-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95205 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT/SCE AND OLD LAKE DRIVE-OCT. 2021
11/08/2021 94721 LANDSCAPE WORK-SEP21/REPLENISH TURF DUE TO

CONSTRUCTION DAMAGE
11/08/2021 95211 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-LIBRARY-OCT. 2021
11/08/2021 95201 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-NORTH AQUEDUCT-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95200 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/VANDENBERG TO FAYOCT. 2021

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 32136 11/08/2021 95199 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-DEPHINIUM/PERHAM TO JFK-OCT21
Payment Amount
11/08/2021 95198 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/BAY AVE. TO GRAHAMOCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95197 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER-OCT. 2021 11/08/2021 95206 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-ANIMAL SHELTER-OCT. 2021 32259 11/22/2021 95196 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SD LMD ZONE 02-OCT. 2021 $18,464.63 11/22/2021 95223 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-NPDES WQB-OCT. 2021
11/22/2021 95465 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-OCT21-ZONE 02/IRRIGATION REPAIRS 11/22/2021 95466 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-OCT21-ZONE 02/IRRIGATION REPAIRS 11/22/2021 95468 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-OCT21-NPDES WQB/IRRIGATION

REPAIRS
Remit to: IRWINDALE, CA FYTD: $276,319.25
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 242506 11/08/2021 INV0262132 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT $3,650.62 242575 11/22/2021 INV0262481 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT $2,682.98 Remit to: VISTA, CA FYTD: $8,481.06
MCCLAIN, MELISSA 32137 11/08/2021 11/7 - 11/9/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM-CORENET GLOBAL CONFERENCE $197.50 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $739.94

MCGRATH RENTCORP AND

SUBSIDIARIES
32138 11/08/2021 300432382 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 3/28-4/26/21 $522.33 11/08/2021 300523752 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 8/5-9/3/21 11/08/2021 300546806 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 9/4-10/3/21 32260 11/22/2021 300569347 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 10/4-11/2/21 $181.65 32317 11/29/2021 300592680 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 11/3-12/2/21 $181.65 Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD: $1,407.96

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MENGISTU, YESHIALEM 32050 11/01/2021 SEP. 2021 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEPTEMBER 2021 $249.20 32261 11/22/2021 OCT. 2021 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - OCTOBER 2021 $195.44 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $609.28

MERCHANTS BUILDING
MAINTENANCE, LLC.
32051 11/01/2021 635158 JUL. 2021 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS AT THE CRC $360.00 32318 11/29/2021 648692 DAY PORTER FOR DAY OF THE DEAD EVENT ON 10/29/21 $86.00 Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD: $350,504.94
MGT OF AMERICA, LLC 32212 11/15/2021 40921 SB 90 CLAIMS MANDATED COST FILING SERVICES (50%) $4,187.50 Remit to: TAMPA, FL FYTD: $4,187.50

MICHAEL BAKER

INTERNATIONAL, INC
32213 11/15/2021 1130246 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - JB TRAIL ATP 3 $1,586.00 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $1,586.00
MICHAELS, JONAH 32139 11/08/2021 101052672 REIMBURSEMENT-ICC CERTIFICATE RENEWAL $219.00 Remit to: MENIFEE, CA FYTD: $219.00

MIRACLE RECREATION

EQUIPMENT
242611 11/29/2021 836396 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - GATEWAY PARK $1,412.81 Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD: $1,412.81

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 32052 11/01/2021 515766643 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $116.63 11/01/2021 515722258 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES
32140 11/08/2021 515814989 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $46.97 32214 11/15/2021 515858307 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $46.97 32263 11/22/2021 515904401 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $81.13 32319 11/29/2021 515950412 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $46.97 Remit to: SANTA BARBARA, CA FYTD: $1,066.96
MITCHELL, AARON 242589 11/22/2021 R21-160314 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-DUPLICATE WEB LICENSE PAYMENT $15.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $15.00
MOBARAK, RAZIA 242541 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
MOHAN, BRIAN 32141 11/08/2021 9/22 - 9/24/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - LEAGUE OF CA. CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPO
$165.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $165.00
MOJICA, JORGE 242590 11/22/2021 2002367.047 CONFERENCE & REC.CTR. RENTAL REFUND $750.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
MONTGOMERY, BRIDGETTE 32215 11/15/2021 11/16 - 11/19/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - CALPELRA 2021 ANNUAL TRAINING

CONFERENCE
$259.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $259.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

MORENO VALLEY CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE
242507 11/08/2021 7298 WAKE-UP MV MEETING-9/20/21 $100.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $250.00
MORENO VALLEY FALCONS 242569 11/15/2021 NOV 4, 2021 MORENO VALLEY FALCON CHEERLEADER UNIFORMS $500.00 Remit to: FRISCO, TX FYTD: $500.00

MORENO VALLEY FRIENDS OF

THE LIBRARY
32216 11/15/2021 OCTOBER 2021 PASS THROUGH FUNDS-10/1-10/31/21 $974.25 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $3,476.10

MORENO VALLEY MALL

HOLDING, LLC
32320 11/29/2021 DEC. 2021 RENT DECEMBER 2021 RENT PAYMENT FOR SP. 2078-M.V. LIBRARY BRANCH
$6,874.54
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $34,372.70

MORENO VALLEY TOW &

RADIATOR
242441 11/01/2021 14878 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $662.50
11/01/2021 21-14926 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
242508 11/08/2021 14980 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $265.00
242549 11/15/2021 15025 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $927.50
11/15/2021 15027 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $5,034.00
MORRIS, IMMANUEL 32142 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242477 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MOSS-TERRY, GENESSE EVETTE 242594 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
MTGL, INC 32053 11/01/2021 66269 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - JB TRAIL ATP 3 $2,905.50 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $7,976.50
MUNIZ, JENNY 32143 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242481 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
MV PONY 242591 11/22/2021 2002368.047 CONFERENCE & REC.CTR. RENTAL REFUND $104.80 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $104.80
NAFCO-INC. DBA PARKING ID 32321 11/29/2021 44975 ZIP BAGS - PARKING ENFORCEMENT $340.25 Remit to: DIAMOND BAR, CA FYTD: $340.25
NAMEKATA, JAMES 32264 11/22/2021 NOV. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - SHITO-RYU KARATE CLASSES $410.40 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $2,214.00
NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE 32322 11/29/2021 MK569767 OFFICE CHAIRS $1,619.97 Remit to: MILWAUKEE, WI FYTD: $1,619.97
NEAGU, LAURA E 242602 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
NOBEL SYSTEMS, INC. 32054 11/01/2021 15235 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL NETWORK GIS DATA CONVERSION

PROJECT SVCS
$7,200.00
Remit to: REDLANDS, CA FYTD: $32,040.00
O'BRIEN, JACQUELINE 242527 11/08/2021 R21-158308 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-RABIES DEPOSIT $20.00 242565 11/15/2021 R21-158308 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 Remit to: GARDENA, CA FYTD: $95.00
OCEGUEDA, SARAHI DENISE 32144 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242467 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
OPERATION SAFEHOUSE, INC. 32145 11/08/2021 2 - JUL/AUG 2021 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT PAYMENT-EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR

YOUTH PROGRAM
$1,120.00
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $4,424.65

PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND

SERVICES LLC
242444 11/01/2021 29324 SIGN POSTS, ANCHORS, SLEEVES, & DRIVE RIVETS $24,680.41 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $24,680.41

PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT

SERVICES
32146 11/08/2021 2075728 PAY PHONE SERVICES-NOV. 2021 $128.28 32323 11/29/2021 2077417 PAY PHONE SERVICES-DEC. 2021 $128.28 Remit to: SAN RAMON, CA FYTD: $769.68

PAPER RECYCLING AND

SHREDDING SPECIALISTS
242509 11/08/2021 498419 ON-SITE DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICES FOR EVENT ON 9/25/21
$2,000.00
Remit to: SAN DIMAS, CA FYTD: $3,115.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

PARSONS TRANSPORTATION
GROUP, INC.
32217 11/15/2021 2111A007 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SVCS-SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC PHASE 2 $7,609.55 Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $18,527.10
PASSCO PACIFICA LLC 242566 11/15/2021 135781 REFUND-BAL. FROM ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT/VVUSD CFD 2021-1JCFA
$3,409.82
Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $3,409.82

PEDLEY SQUARE VETERINARY
CLINIC
32218 11/15/2021 SEP-2021 VETERINARY SERVICES-MV ANIMAL SHELTER $7,693.50 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $48,284.72
PENA, JOSHUA 32147 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242482 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
PEPE'S TOWING 242445 11/01/2021 101282 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $265.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $2,662.84
PERCEPTIVE ENTERPRISES, INC. 32266 11/22/2021 3732 PROFESSIONAL DBE/ CPR CONSULTING SERVICES $6,744.00 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $37,242.00
PEREZ, MAREENA ILENE 242596 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
PINS & NEEDLES 242446 11/01/2021 13801 COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & PARKING CONTROL SHIRTS/HATS $1,258.79 242612 11/29/2021 13884 PARKING CONTROL SHIRTS/SAFETY VESTS AND COMM.

ENHANCEMENT SHIRTS
$169.44
Remit to: HEMET, CA FYTD: $1,428.23
POWER SPEAKS LOUDER 32220 11/15/2021 NOV 10, 2021 REIMBURSEMENT-COMMUNITY OUTREACH EVENT $217.95 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $217.95

PRIME ACTUARIAL CONSULTING
LLC
32056 11/01/2021 28715 WORKERS COMP ACTUARIAL REVIEW SERVICE $6,500.00 Remit to: MEDFORD, OR FYTD: $6,500.00

PROFESSIONAL

COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
PCN
242577 11/22/2021 159000463 LIVE ANSWERING SERVICE FOR ROTATIONAL TOW PROGRAM $1,033.87 11/22/2021 158910255 LIVE ANSWERING SERVICE FOR ROTATIONAL TOW PROGRAM Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $3,018.11
PSOMAS 32221 11/15/2021 178084 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - JUAN BAUTISTA TRAIL ATP-2 $1,865.82 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $10,903.35
PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 32267 11/22/2021 130212 MOTOR HELMET & RADIO COMMUNICATIONS KIT FOR TRAFFIC

OFFICER
$3,055.40
11/22/2021 130193 MOTOR HELMET & RADIO COMMUNICATIONS KIT FOR TRAFFIC

OFFICER
32324 11/29/2021 130237 BATTERY FOR MOTOR HELMET RADIO GEAR $53.86 Remit to: TORRANCE, CA FYTD: $7,199.94

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
RAHMAN, CHANDRA 32148 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242473 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
RAMOS, ROBERTO 242464 11/01/2021 SEP. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-TAE KWON DO CLASSES $1,848.00 11/01/2021 OCT. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-TAE KWON DO CLASSES 11/01/2021 AUG. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-TAE KWON DO CLASSES Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $2,436.00
RAYO, ADRIANA 242537 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/08/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
11/08/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 242593 11/22/2021 01K0035449404 BOTTLED WATER-SUNNYMEAD ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE $65.43 11/22/2021 01K0035449180 BOTTLED WATER, DELIVERY & RENTAL-ARMADA

ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE
11/22/2021 01K0035449305 BOTTLED WATER, DELIVERY & RENTAL-CREEKSIDE

ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE
Remit to: LOUISVILLE, KY FYTD: $333.30
REED, LATRICIA ANN 32149 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242475 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
REGALADO, BLANCA E 32057 11/01/2021 OCT. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-FOLKLORIC DANCE ADULT & YOUTH

CLASSES
$559.20
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $1,996.20
RHYTHM TECH PRODUCTIONS 32058 11/01/2021 636 SOUND ENGINEER & AV TECH SERVICES FOR MEMORIAL ON 10/18/21
$1,086.12
32150 11/08/2021 635 SOUND ENGINEER & AV TECH SERVICES - EL GRITO EVENT ON 9/15/21
$844.76
Remit to: CALIMESA, CA FYTD: $35,774.19
RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. 242447 11/01/2021 290884 PORTABLE RESTROOMS RENTAL-EQUESTRIAN CENTER $3,357.42 11/01/2021 289310 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL-COTTONWOOD GOLF COURSE 11/01/2021 289311 PORTABLE RESTROOMS RENTAL-EQUESTRIAN CENTER 11/01/2021 289760 PORTABLE RESTROOMS & WASH STATIONS FOR EL GRITO EVENT 11/01/2021 292364 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL AT POLICE STATION 11/01/2021 290883 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL-COTTONWOOD GOLF COURSE 242510 11/08/2021 290711 PORTABLE RESTROOMS RENTAL/SERVICE-WESTON PARK $3,312.55 11/08/2021 292524 PORTABLE RESTROOMS & WASH STATIONS FOR DAY OF THE

DEAD EVENT
11/08/2021 292564 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL-COTTONWOOD GOLF COURSE 11/08/2021 292565 PORTABLE RESTROOMS RENTAL-EQUESTRIAN CENTER Remit to: LAKE ELSINORE, CA FYTD: $22,130.93

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD

CONTROL & WATER,
CONSERVATION DIST.
242613 11/29/2021 FC019107 JB TRAIL ATP 3 ENCROACHMENT CHARGES $361.93 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $4,428.78

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CLINIC 242567 11/15/2021 700000183 110221 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS/DRUG SCREENINGS $3,255.50 Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $8,212.80

RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH

SYSTEMS - MEDICAL CTR
32223 11/15/2021 1168 SART EXAMS BILLING FOR PD - OCT. 2021 $3,600.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $15,600.00

ROADPOST USA INC DBA

BLUECOSMO
32325 11/29/2021 BU01393515 SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE PLAN-FIRE $545.40 Remit to: SEATTLE, WA FYTD: $2,737.78

ROBLEDO DIONICIO, ROBERTO
MARTIN
242601 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
RODRIGUEZ, BRENDA 32151 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242485 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY &

SCOTT, LLP
32268 11/22/2021 67264 AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY ENDING 6/30/21 - OCT 2021 PROGRESS

BILLING
$14,240.00
Remit to: SAN BERNARDINO, CA FYTD: $56,865.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
ROSALES, DAISY ABIGAIL 32152 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242478 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
RSG, INC 32269 11/22/2021 I007884 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE MONITORING SERVICESOCT. 2021$3,458.75 Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD: $25,208.65
RUDOSKY, BRIGITTE 242463 11/01/2021 R21-157140 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER AND RABIES DEPOSITS $95.00 Remit to: EAST HIGHLAND, CA FYTD: $95.00
RUIZ, ANDREW ROMERO 32153 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242472 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
SABLAN, VICENTE 242521 11/08/2021 11/18 - 11/23/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - CNOA TRAINING INSTITUTE & LAW

ENFORCEMENT EXPO
$338.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $338.25
SAFEWAY SIGN CO. 32270 11/22/2021 52053 TRAFFIC SIGNS/HARDWARE $703.07 Remit to: ADELANTO, CA FYTD: $15,594.24

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
SALVATION ARMY 32154 11/08/2021 2 /CDBG HTW 2021 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT PAYMENT-NEIGHBORHOOD CLEANUP/HOMELESS TO WORK$2,064.07 32271 11/22/2021 ESG 20/21 - 12 ESG SUBRECIPIENT PAYMENT-STREET OUTREACH PROGRAM $7,395.61 11/22/2021 3 /CDBG HTW 2021 CDBG SUBGRANTEE PAYMENT-NEIGHBORHOOD CLEANUP/HOMELESS TO WORK Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $123,532.69
SAM, MYLING 242457 11/01/2021 11/9 - 11/12/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM - ICI ADVANCED CHILD ABUSE - PHYSICAL

TRAINING
$231.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $231.25

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

SC COMMERCIAL LLC DBA SC
FUELS
32059 11/01/2021 1970586-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT $21,000.35 11/01/2021 1975960-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1984089-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1985989-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1982899-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1978804-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1969576-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1981074-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1974162-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1976513-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/01/2021 1986823-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 32224 11/15/2021 1960190-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT $5,913.01 11/15/2021 1958568-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/15/2021 1960733-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 32272 11/22/2021 1994340-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT $22,126.12 11/22/2021 1990069-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 1989044-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 2002164-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 2000508-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 1998478-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 1998578-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 1991040-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 11/22/2021 1995112-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT Remit to: ORANGE, CA FYTD: $166,911.15
SEARLE CREATIVE GROUP, LLC 32326 11/29/2021 21340 WEBSITE HOSTING & MAINTENANCE-OCT. 2021 $1,105.00 Remit to: VENTURA, CA FYTD: $6,544.75

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
SECURITY LOCK & KEY 242448 11/01/2021 31001 LOCK REPAIR/SERVICES-COMMUNITY PARK SNACK BAR DOOR $181.42 242578 11/22/2021 31093 LOCK REPAIR/SERVICES-MORRISON PARK MENS RR/EL POTRERO

STOREROOM
$213.19
Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $1,679.91
SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES, INC.

DBA SSD ALARM
32273 11/22/2021 R-00327286 ALARM SYSTEM SERVICES FOR MOVAL & KITCHING SUBSTATIONS-DEC. 2021
$464.85
Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $2,789.10
SKY PUBLISHING 32155 11/08/2021 21-6_21 1/2 PAGE SHOP MOVAL AD-YOUR VILLA MAGAZINE/2021 ISSUE 6 $1,000.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $6,640.00
SLAWSON, DAVID 242528 11/08/2021 124940 REFUND-EROSION CONTROL SECURITY DEPOSIT/PEN17-0135 $5,975.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $5,975.00
SMITH, JOSEPH 242622 11/29/2021 12/5 -12/10/21 TRAVEL PER DIEM-CELLEBRITE CERT. OPERATOR/PHYS. ANALYST

TRAINING
$379.25
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $499.25

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
242449 11/01/2021 3866560 EMMISIONS FEE INVOICE-FIRE STATION 99 $869.70 11/01/2021 3862344 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEES-FIRE STATION 65
11/01/2021 3862896 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEES-FIRE STATION 99
11/01/2021 3864076 EMMISIONS FEE INVOICE-FIRE STATION 65 242511 11/08/2021 3870576 EMISSIONS FEES INVOICE-FIRE STATION 48 $1,445.31 11/08/2021 3898385 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEES-CITY YARD
11/08/2021 3893343 EMMISIONS FEE INVOICE-ANIMAL SHELTER 11/08/2021 3902044 EMMISIONS FEE INVOICE-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER 11/08/2021 3869078 ANNUAL OPERATING FEES- FIRE STATION 48 11/08/2021 3890756 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEES-ANIMAL SHELTER
Remit to: DIAMOND BAR, CA FYTD: $3,170.45
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 242450 11/01/2021 OCT-21 11/1/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $3,637.49 242550 11/15/2021 OCT-21 11/15/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $4,722.43 242579 11/22/2021 OCT-21 11/22/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $15,857.10 242614 11/29/2021 NOV-21 11/29/21 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $736.60 Remit to: ROSEMEAD, CA FYTD: $855,566.65
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 242580 11/22/2021 OCT-2021 GAS CHARGES $9,346.51 Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD: $22,249.76
STANDARD INSURANCE CO 242513 11/08/2021 211101 EMPLOYEE SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE $1,264.73 Remit to: PORTLAND, OR FYTD: $6,170.25

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY

SOLUTIONS, INC
32061 11/01/2021 6001681138 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-EMPL. RESOURCE CENTER/AUG. 2021
$6,065.33
11/01/2021 6001654128 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-VAL VERDE (RED MAPLE) CC/AUGOCT 2021 11/01/2021 6001678998 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-EOC/AUG. 2021 11/01/2021 6001659290 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-ANNEX 1 FIRE ALARM/AUG-OCT 2021
11/01/2021 6001659257 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-COTTONWOOD GOLF CENTER/AUG-OCT 2021
11/01/2021 6001658967-CH ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-CITY HALL/AUG-OCT 2021 11/01/2021 6001645339 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-LIBRARY/AUG-OCT 2021 11/01/2021 6001625443 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR/JUL-SEP21
11/01/2021 6001623324 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-SUNNYMEAD MID. SCHOOLTHINK/JUL-SEP 2021 11/01/2021 6001528949 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-ANIMAL SHELTER & SENIOR CTR/JUN-AUG 2021
11/01/2021 6001618984 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-RAINBOW RIDGE CHILDCARE/AUGOCT 2021 11/01/2021 6001619242 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING/JUL-SEP 2021
11/01/2021 6001619891 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-CY SANTIAGO OFFICE FIRE ALARM/JUL-SEP 21
11/01/2021 6001530474 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-CITY YARD & TRANSP.

TRAILER/JUN-AUG 2021
11/01/2021 6001534524 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-IRIS PLAZA LIBRARY/JUN-AUG 2021 11/01/2021 6001601856 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-EMPL. RESOURCE CENTER/JUL. 2021
11/01/2021 6001603310 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-EOC/JUL. 2021 11/01/2021 6001614253 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-ANNEX 1, TOWNGATE CTR & CRC/JUL-SEP 2021

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000

STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY

SOLUTIONS, INC
32061 11/01/2021 6001576408 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-MARCH FIELD PARK ANNEX/JULSEP 2021 Payment Amount
11/01/2021 6001530842 ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING-CY SANTIAGO OFFICE BURG.

ALARM/JUN-AUG21
Remit to: PALATINE, IL FYTD: $15,876.57

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1 32336 11/24/2021 103121 SALES & USE TAX REPORT FOR 10/1-10/31/21 $1,202.00 Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $3,317.00
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF

JUSTICE
242514 11/08/2021 524561 (HR) FINGERPRINTING SERVICES-HR/EMPLOYMENT/VOLUNTEERS RELATED-JUL2021
$1,100.00
11/08/2021 524561 (BL) FINGERPRINTING SERVICES-BUSINESS LICENSE RELATED-JUL 2021 242515 11/08/2021 530402 (HR) FINGERPRINTING SERVICES-HR/EMPLOYMENT/VOLUNTEERS RELATED-AUG2021
$1,055.00
242551 11/15/2021 542653 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINTING APPS FOR PD-OCT. 2021 $96.00 242552 11/15/2021 530402 (OEM) FINGERPRINTING SERVICES-OEM/ERF RELATED-AUG 2021 $47.00 242581 11/22/2021 541116 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS SERVICES FOR PD-SEP. 2021 $1,050.00 11/22/2021 541164 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS SERVICES FOR PD-JUN21

CORRECTION/REBILLS
Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD: $12,880.00
STC TRAFFIC, INC. 32156 11/08/2021 4923 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER CONSULTING SERVICES-SEP. 2021 $5,920.00 Remit to: CARLSBAD, CA FYTD: $63,695.73

STENO SOLUTIONS
TRANSCRIPTION SVCS., INC.
32226 11/15/2021 43497 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES FOR PD-OCT. 2021 $268.83 Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD: $2,276.54

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

STEVEN PERRY PROFESSIONAL

PHOTOGRAPHY
32062 11/01/2021 211019.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/18/21 - BACA MEMORIAL $475.50 32157 11/08/2021 211101.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/29/21 - DAY OF THE DEAD ARTFEST EVENT
$477.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $6,363.45
STILES ANIMAL REMOVAL, INC. 242553 11/15/2021 111522 DECEASED LARGE ANIMAL REMOVAL SERVICES-OCT. 2021 $2,050.00 Remit to: GUASTI, CA FYTD: $8,430.00

STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON &
RAUTH
32274 11/22/2021 381164-0000 LEGAL SERVICES-GENERAL/HOUSING AUTHORITY MATTERS-OCT. 2021
$86.00
Remit to: NEWPORT BEACH, CA FYTD: $23,081.20
SUDQI, HISHAM 32158 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242474 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
SUNNYMEAD ACE HARDWARE 242453 11/01/2021 92725 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION $182.11 11/01/2021 92765 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION
11/01/2021 92818 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION 99
242554 11/15/2021 92911 MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PD $16.11
242582 11/22/2021 92959 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION 65 $67.05 11/22/2021 92992 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION
11/22/2021 92993 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION
11/22/2021 92890 MISC SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATION 48
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $1,373.12

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRETE 242516 11/08/2021 234785 DELIVERY OF MIXED CONCRETE $673.16 242616 11/29/2021 244941 DELIVERY OF MIXED CONCRETE $3,183.19 11/29/2021 242080 DELIVERY OF MIXED CONCRETE
11/29/2021 242384 DELIVERY OF MIXED CONCRETE
Remit to: HEMET, CA FYTD: $3,856.35

THE ADVANTAGE GROUP/ FLEX

ADVANTAGE
32228 11/15/2021 135884 FLEX AND COBRA ADMIN FEES-OCT 2021 $1,584.15 Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD: $239,744.59
THE LEW EDWARDS GROUP 32159 11/08/2021 21-08 STRATEGIC CONSULTING PLANNING-OCTOBER 2021 $6,000.00 Remit to: OAKLAND, CA FYTD: $30,000.00
THOMAS, ANITA 242529 11/08/2021 2002347.047 TOWNGATE COMM. CTR. RENTAL REFUND $209.60 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $209.60
THOMPSON COBURN LLP 32064 11/01/2021 3510017 LEGAL SERVICES-MVU/RELIABILITY STANDARD COMPLIANCE/SEP. 2021
$133.49
32327 11/29/2021 3514807 LEGAL SERVICES-MVU/RELIABILITY STANDARD COMPLIANCE/OCT. 2021
$124.27
Remit to: WASHINGTON, DC FYTD: $632.07

THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
PUBLISHING CORP.
32229 11/15/2021 845287940 AUTO TRACK SERVICES FOR PD INVESTIGATIONS-OCT. 2021 $1,210.41 Remit to: CAROL STREAM, IL FYTD: $6,052.05

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR

CORPORATION
32160 11/08/2021 6000538832 ELEVATOR REPAIR-CITY HALL $405.30 Remit to: ATLANTA, GA FYTD: $28,686.18

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
TIME WARNER CABLE 242555 11/15/2021 091922301110121 FIBER INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES - NOV. 2021 $844.00 Remit to: PITTSBURGH, PA FYTD: $11,574.00
TITAN RENTAL GROUP, INC. 242518 11/08/2021 RES# 43196-FINAL RENTAL OF CANOPIES, TABLES, CHAIRS, ETC. FOR EL GRITO EVENT $2,406.12 11/08/2021 RES# 43444 RENTAL OF CHAIRS & EZ-UPS FOR SPECIAL EVENT 9/25/21 242556 11/15/2021 RES# 43434-FINAL RENTAL OF TABLES, CHAIRS, ETC. FOR DAY OF THE DEAD EVENT $591.23 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $8,977.53
T-MOBILE USA 242454 11/01/2021 9470939473 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD $60.00 242517 11/08/2021 9471593375 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD $60.00 242617 11/29/2021 9473885842 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD $30.00 Remit to: SEATTLE, WA FYTD: $3,840.00
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. 32275 11/22/2021 17701 CONSULTING SERVICES-LOBBYIST/ADVOCATE & GRANT WRITINGNOV. 2021$4,000.00 Remit to: NEWPORT BEACH, CA FYTD: $16,000.00
TRICHE, TARA 32276 11/22/2021 NOV. 2021 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-BALLET/DANCE EXPLORATION CLASSES $1,814.40 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $7,560.20
TSG ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA THE

SOLIS GROUP
32277 11/22/2021 7922 $2,193.00
32328 11/29/2021 7923 $4,488.00
11/29/2021 7924
PROF SVCS-CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHAB FY20/21
PROF SVCS-PAVEMENT REHAB FOR VARIOUS STS FY20/21
PROF SVCS-SR-60/MORENO BEACH IC PHASE 2
Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $21,126.00
TUMON BAY RESORT & SPA 32329 11/29/2021 DEC. 2021 RENT DEC. 2021 RENT (INCL. CAM, ETC) FOR BUSINESS & EMP.

RESOURCE CTR
$7,994.81
Remit to: TAMUNING, GU FYTD: $39,974.05

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
U.S. BANK NA 32278 11/22/2021 12936666 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAL SERVICES-SEP. 2021 $625.00 Remit to: ST. PAUL, MN FYTD: $10,001,875.00
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 242458 11/01/2021 WINTER/SPRNG2022 PERMIT #153-DEPOSIT FOR POSTAGE TO MAIL RECREATON GUIDES
$10,000.00
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $20,000.00

UCR CENTER FOR ECONOMIC

FORECASTING & DEVELOPMENT
32279 11/22/2021 1914 2021 HISTORICAL EMPLOYMENT REPORT - INITIAL 50% INVOICE $5,000.00 Remit to: MILL VALLEY, CA FYTD: $5,000.00

ULTRASERV AUTOMATED

SERVICES, LLC
32161 11/08/2021 256858 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION $537.98 11/08/2021 256934 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/BREAK ROOM LOCATION 11/08/2021 256935 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION 11/08/2021 256859 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-ANNEX 1
32280 11/22/2021 257006 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION $345.09 11/22/2021 257007 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY YARD
32330 11/29/2021 257180 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/BREAK ROOM LOCATION $353.95 11/29/2021 257174 COFFEE SERVICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION Remit to: COSTA MESA, CA FYTD: $4,960.73

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 32281 11/22/2021 1020210461 (d) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-OCT. 2021 $211.30 11/22/2021 1020210461 (b) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-OCT. 2021 11/22/2021 1020210461 (a) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-OCT. 2021 11/22/2021 1020210461 (c) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-OCT. 2021 242584 11/22/2021 dsb20205498 (a) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
$124.53
11/22/2021 dsb20205498 (d) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
11/22/2021 dsb20205498 (c) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
11/22/2021 dsb20205498 (b) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD: $2,006.73

UNITED POWER GENERATION,
INC.
32230 11/15/2021 5364 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT./LOAD BANK REPAIR-CITY YARD
$9,466.72
11/15/2021 5358 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT./LOAD BANK REPAIR-CITY HALL
11/15/2021 5366 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT./LOAD BANK REPAIR-ANIMAL

SHELTER
11/15/2021 5367 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT./LOAD BANK REPAIRCONFERENCE & REC Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD: $16,835.99

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP 32162 11/08/2021 CI275267 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES $3,803.95 11/08/2021 CI274784 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 11/08/2021 CI274504 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 11/08/2021 CI269699 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 11/08/2021 CI271912 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 11/08/2021 CI272471 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 32282 11/22/2021 CI275638 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES $2,231.68 11/22/2021 CI276014 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES 32331 11/29/2021 CI276463 STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES & ACCESSORIES $912.91 Remit to: KANSAS CITY, MO FYTD: $25,571.76
UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA, INC. 32231 11/15/2021 114-12534342 FENCE RENTAL AT ANIMAL SHELTER 10/21-11/17/21 $106.40 Remit to: PHOENIX, AZ FYTD: $532.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

VACATE TERMITE & PEST

ELIMINATION COMPANY
32232 11/15/2021 114068 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-COTTONWOOD GOLF CENTER $1,205.00 11/15/2021 114065 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE 11/15/2021 114064 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR.
11/15/2021 114063 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-TRANSPORTATION TRAILER 11/15/2021 114069 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-ANNEX 1 11/15/2021 114062 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-CITY YARD 11/15/2021 113832 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-LIBRARY 11/15/2021 114070 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER 11/15/2021 114071 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-EOC
11/15/2021 114072 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 11/15/2021 114073 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-CITY HALL 11/15/2021 114066 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 58 (SECOND SVC)
11/15/2021 114074 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-ANIMAL SHELTER 11/15/2021 113810 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 99 11/15/2021 113813 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 58 11/15/2021 113823 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 6 11/15/2021 113831 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 91 11/15/2021 113821 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 48 11/15/2021 113825 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER
11/15/2021 113830 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 65 11/15/2021 113816 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-SENIOR CENTER 11/15/2021 113817 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-FIRE STATION 2 11/15/2021 113551 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEP. 2021-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER
11/15/2021 113549 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEP. 2021-FIRE STATION 6 32283 11/22/2021 113811 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-OCT. 2021-UTILITY FIELD OFFICE $45.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $7,615.00
VALENCIA, MICHAEL JESSE 242600 11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
VALENZUELA, BRIANNA 32163 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242469 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

VALLEY CITIES GONZALES FENCE
CO
32332 11/29/2021 11103 FENCE INSTALLATION MATERIALS & LABOR-BASEBALL

NETTING/JFK PARK
$13,549.00
Remit to: NORCO, CA FYTD: $15,765.00
VALLEY WIDE TOWING, LLC 32066 11/01/2021 21-10975 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $530.00 11/01/2021 11000 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
32164 11/08/2021 21-11067 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $415.00 11/08/2021 11080 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
32334 11/29/2021 21-11031 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $397.50 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $4,850.00
VAUGHN, ARLENE R 242471 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
242532 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
VAUGHN, JOZLYN DEVINE 32165 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242468 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
VERDUZCO, INDA 242595 11/22/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $750.00 11/22/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
11/22/2021 MV-NOVEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 242557 11/15/2021 9890329681 DATA CHARGES FOR CELLULAR SERVICE FOR PD DEVICES $390.34 242618 11/29/2021 9892534963 DATA CHARGES FOR CELLULAR SERVICE FOR PD DEVICES $421.18 Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD: $1,947.42
VERIZON WIRELESS - LERT B 242619 11/29/2021 2145341595758950 CELLULAR PINGS FOR PD $185.00 11/29/2021 2145341543827558 CELLULAR PINGS FOR PD
Remit to: BEDMINSTER, NJ FYTD: $235.00

VERTIGIS NORTH AMERICA DBA

LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS
242620 11/29/2021 IN-VGNA-00002105 ANNUAL GCX STANDARD T1 MAINTENANCE 2/22/22-2/21/23 $5,464.00 Remit to: VICTORIA, BC FYTD: $23,081.50
VILLAFANA, JAIME CORONA 242592 11/22/2021 R21-160600 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-CHARGED LATE FEE BY MISTAKE $21.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $21.00
VILLALOBOS, KHRYSTYNE 242623 11/29/2021 FALL 2021 TUITION/EMPLOYEE EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT $190.00 Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $190.00

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
VISION SERVICE PLAN 32166 11/08/2021 813511097 EMPLOYEE VISION INSURANCE $3,351.55 Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD: $16,946.76
VOICES FOR CHILDREN, INC. 32067 11/01/2021 2 / AUG-21 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT PAYMENT-COURT APPTD. SPECIAL

ADVOCATE PROGRAM
$2,314.58
Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD: $3,796.96
VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEM, INC. 32233 11/15/2021 8693366022139 FUEL CARD CHARGES-PD TRAFFIC MOTORS $2,636.11 32284 11/22/2021 8692116152144 CNG FUEL PURCHASES $7,102.55 Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD: $49,657.79

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
VULCAN MATERIALS CO, INC. 32068 11/01/2021 73092744 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS $1,199.26 11/01/2021 73076667 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73076666 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73080836 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73078937 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73084895 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73084896 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73088098 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/01/2021 73094496 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
32234 11/15/2021 73067420 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS $1,591.72 11/15/2021 73070038 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73072405 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73074152 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73060910 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73063435 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73065613 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73082761 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73070037 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/15/2021 73063436 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
32285 11/22/2021 73112933 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS $3,543.54 11/22/2021 73106420 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73110067 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73103676 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73101053 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73099298 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73110066 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
11/22/2021 73103677 ASPHALTIC/CRACK SEAL MATERIALS
Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $18,588.23

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
WASHINGTON, TIMIA 32167 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242466 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00

WAXIE ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA

WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
32069 11/01/2021 80404779 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PD $997.75 11/01/2021 80404676 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PD
11/01/2021 80393962 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PD
32235 11/15/2021 80430179 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PD $181.77 32335 11/29/2021 80459864 JANITORIAL/CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR LIBRARY BRANCHES $271.52 Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $4,611.69
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. 32286 11/22/2021 178590 TREE SERVICES - GPS INVENTORY AT VARIOUS SITES $1,695.00 Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $124,317.00

WEST COAST SHOPPING CART
SERVICE, INC.
242558 11/15/2021 21-049 SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL SERVICES-OCT. 2021 $3,655.00 Remit to: WEST COVINA, CA FYTD: $16,481.50

WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER

DISTRICT
242585 11/22/2021 23866-018292/OC1 WATER CHARGES-SKATE PARK $4,467.39 11/22/2021 24753-018620/OC1 WATER CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BALLFIELDS 11/22/2021 23821-018257/OC1 WATER CHARGES-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR.

LANDSCAPE
11/22/2021 23821-018258/OC1 WATER CHARGES-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR.-BLDG. 938
Remit to: ARTESIA, CA FYTD: $30,969.58

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
WHITING, GAMBRA 32168 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242479 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 32169 11/08/2021 00713468 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES-SEP. 2021/NSP CLOSEOUT, ETC.
$4,560.00
Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD: $289,826.99
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 32170 11/08/2021 010-49262 ERAP GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2021 $7,720.00 32287 11/22/2021 010-49695 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE SERVICES RE: REF OF VARIOUS LRBS/TABS 2017
$1,250.00
Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD: $138,804.18
WILMINGTON TRUST 242455 11/01/2021 20211007-113245A 2020 TRIP REFUND TRUSTEE FEES $1,500.00 Remit to: WILMINGTON, DE FYTD: $221,397.68
XEROX CAPITAL SERVICES, LLC 32236 11/15/2021 014752973 COLOR COPIER EQUIPMENT LEASE-OCT. 2021-PARKS DEPT./CRC $4,236.40 11/15/2021 014553315 COLOR COPIER LEASE/BILLABLE PRINTS-SEP. 2021-PARKS DEPT. /CRC
11/15/2021 014031414 COLOR COPIER LEASE/BILLABLE PRINTS-JUL. 2021-PARKS DEPT. /CRC
11/15/2021 014031415 COLOR COPIER EQUIPMENT LEASE-JUL. 2021-PARKS DEPT./CRC 11/15/2021 014507247 COLOR COPIER EQUIPMENT LEASE-SEP. 2021-PARKS DEPT./CRC 11/15/2021 014263910 COLOR COPIER EQUIPMENT LEASE-AUG. 2021-PARKS DEPT./CRC 11/15/2021 014263909 COLOR COPIER LEASE/BILLABLE PRINTS-AUG. 2021-PARKS DEPT. /CRC
Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD: $6,430.86

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date
Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period11/1/2021 through 11/30/2021
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
ZECO SYSTEMS INC. DBA

GREENLOTS
32288 11/22/2021 INV1902390 FUSE HOLDER/PARTS FOR UPGRADE $14,539.59 11/22/2021 INV1902313 MAINTENANCE LABOR PLAN
11/22/2021 INV1902156 MAINTENANCE LABOR PLAN
Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD: $15,815.31
ZENDEJAS, JENNICA 32172 11/08/2021 MV-NOVEMBER MOVAL LEARNS-NOVEMBER 2021 $250.00 242480 11/01/2021 MV-SEPTEMBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2021 $500.00 11/01/2021 MV-OCTOBER 21 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2021
Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD: $750.00
TOTAL CHECKS UNDER $25,000
GRAND TOTAL $21,173,389.47
$1,018,519.10

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: November 2021 Payment Register (5665 : PAYMENT REGISTER- NOVEMBER 2021) Report to City Council
ID#5667 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brian Mohan, Assistant City Manager
AGENDA DATE: January 18, 2022
TITLE: LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

DISCUSSION
The attached list of personnel changes scheduled since the last City Council meeting is presented for City Council ratification.

Staffing of City positions ensures assignment of highly qualified and trained personnel to achieve Momentum MoVal priorities, objectives and initiatives.

FISCAL IMPACT
All position changes are consistent with appropriations previously approved by the City Council.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Janelle Bizzle Brian Mohan
Management Aide Assistant City Manager
Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None
A.7
Packet Pg. 209

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Personnel Changes for Staff Report 01.18_2

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval  Approved . 1/10/22 7:09 AM
City Attorney Approval  Approved .

City Manager Approval  Approved . 1/10/22 8:52 AM
A.7
Packet Pg. 210
City of Moreno Valley
Personnel Changes – October – December 2021
January 18, 2022
New Hires
Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services Director, Parks & Community Services Department Benjamin Kim, Assistant City Manager, City Manager’s Office Iesha Shabazz, Management Aide, Administration, Parks & Community Services Department Anthony Brandyberry, Fleet & Facilities Maintenance Supervisor, Maintenance and Operations, Public Works Department
Sergio Herrera, Information Technology Technician, Technology Services, Financial & Management Services Department
Jeffrey Joseph, Park Ranger, Parks & Community Services Department Christian Sharp, Telecommunication Technician, Technology Services, Financial & Management Services Department
Courtney Welch, Animal Care Technician, Animal Services, Community Development Department Melissa Walker, Engineering Division Manager, Land Development, Public Works Department Malaika Davis, Senior Administrative Assistant, Community Enhancement, Community Development Department
Daniela Sanchez Fonseca, Administrative Assistant, City Council Promotions
Diane Dinerstein
From: Animal Services Assistant, Animal Services, Community Development Department To: Animal Services Office Supervisor, Animal Services, Community Development Department Sharon Goodale
From: Management Analyst, Financial & Management Services Department To: Senior Management Analyst, Public Works, Capital Projects Angel Gutierrez
From: Management Analyst, Economic Development Department To: Senior Management Analyst, Economic Development Department Melissa McClain
From: Management Analyst, Economic Development Department EDD To: Senior Management Analyst, Economic Development Department A.7.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Personnel Changes for Staff Report 01.18_2 [Revision 3] (5667 : LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES) Andrea Palacios
From: Senior Administrative Assistant, Fire
To: Management Aide, Fire
Tyler Smith
From: Senior Administrative Assistant, Financial & Management Services Department /Purchasing To: Management Assistant, Public Works Department, Maintenance and Operations Kathryn Vigil
From: Deputy City Clerk
To: Management Aide, Public Works Department, Capital Projects Clement Jimenez
From: Senior Engineer, Public Works Department, Electric Utility To: Principal Engineer, Public Works Department, Land Development Launa Jimenez
From: Senior Management Analyst, Public Works Dept., Capital Projects To: Financial Resources Division Manager, Financial & Management Services Fred Garcia
From: Lead Parks Maintenance Worker, Parks & Community Services To: Senior Parks Maintenance Technician, Parks & Community Services Daisy Ramirez
From: Administrative Assistant, Fire
To: Senior Administrative Assistant, Fire
Transfers
None
Separations
Jonah Michaels, Building Inspector II, Community Development Department Megan Palau, Animal Control Officer, Animal Services Division, Community Development Department Edna Swaim, Human Resources Analyst, Financial & Management Services Department, Human Resources
Carlos Lira, Parks Maintenance Worker, Parks & Community Services Department Brooke McKinney, Treasury Operations Division Manager, Financial & Management Services Department Candace Cassel, Special Districts Division Manager, Financial & Management Services Department Joy Pierzchalski, Senior Administrative Assistant, Parks & Community Services A.7.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Personnel Changes for Staff Report 01.18_2 [Revision 3] (5667 : LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES) Report to City Council
ID#5648 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Salisbury, Chief of Police
AGENDA DATE: January 18, 2022
TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF THE TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT

GRANT PROGRAM AWARD, MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Accept the Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant Program grant award in the amount of $156,400 for overtime to conduct tobacco enforcement operations beginning in Fiscal Year 2022/23 and continuing over a three-year period.

2. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to appropriate $156,400 as revenue and expense per fiscal year in Fund (2300) beginning in Fiscal Year 2022/23 and carrying over any unused budget over the three-year grant period.

3. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Moreno Valley and the Department of Justice regarding the Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant Program award.

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-XX a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement with the State of California Department of Justice.

SUMMARY
This report requests that the City Council accept the $156,400 Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant Program award, appropriate funds for overtime to conduct tobacco enforcement operations beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 and continuing for the A.8
Packet Pg. 213

three-year grant period, approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Moreno Valley and the Department of Justice regarding the Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant Program award, and approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-XX authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement with the State of California Department of Justice.

DISCUSSION
The California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tax Act of 2016 (Proposition 56) provides local public agencies with funding to promote a healthier California by reducing illegal sales and marketing of cigarettes and tobacco products to minors. The Proposition specifically allocates $26.8 million of annual revenue to the California Department of Justice. (Rev. & Tax Code, § 30130.57(e)(1).) These funds support local agencies to enforce tobacco-related statutes and ordinances, including to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products to minors.

The City of Moreno Valley is committed to providing a safe environment for the citizens of Moreno Valley. The Moreno Valley Police Department has determined that a number of calls for service are being generated related to licensed tobacco retailers in the city.

Some of these calls involve minors and adults under the age of 21 buying tobacco and/or electronic smoking devices and soliciting adults over the age of 21 to buy tobacco products from them. In an effort to address the sale of tobacco products to minors and underage adults, staff has identified a grant to assist law enforcement with their efforts to reduce problems and calls for service at licensed tobacco retailers.

There are approximately 94 licensed tobacco retailers within the City of Moreno Valley.

Although most avoid the attention of law enforcement, there are a number that have generated calls for service relating to tobacco sales. The time spent by Moreno Valley Police Department deputies could be better spent assisting the community with other issues. In addition, the citizens of Moreno Valley suffer as a result of the problems that spill out into the community relating to long term health effects relating to adolescent’s exposure to tobacco products.

The California Department of Public Health has confirmed that exposure to nicotine during adolescence can harm brain development and predispose youth to future tobacco use. These health effects can intensify anxiety and aggression and cause learning disabilities. In addition, long term exposure can cause to lung/heart disease and many types of cancer.

The Moreno Valley Police Department will implement as many as nine (9) “Minor Decoy” operations per fiscal year for three-years. The “Minor Decoy” program allows law enforcement agencies to use persons under 20 years of age as decoys for the purpose of purchasing tobacco beverages from licensed premises. The use of underage decoys to check whether licensees are selling tobacco products to minors can show a dramatic drop in the illegal activity when the “Minor Decoy” program is repeatedly used.

A.8
Packet Pg. 214

The Moreno Valley Police Department also intend to use the grant funding to implement nine (9) “Shoulder Tap” operations per fiscal year for three-years. “Shoulder Tap” is a common method used by persons under the age of 21 to solicit persons to purchase and furnish them with tobacco products. The “Shoulder Tap” program is an enforcement program local law enforcement agencies use to detect and deter shoulder tap activity.

During the program, a minor decoy, under the direct supervision of law enforcement officers, solicits adults outside a licensed store to buy the minor tobacco products. Any person seen furnishing these products to the minor decoy is arrested (either cited or booked) for furnishing tobacco products to a minor (a violation of Section 25658(a) Business and Professions Code).

The Problem Oriented Policing (POP) Team will provide a proactive approach through the use of “Minor Decoy” and “Shoulder Tap” operations. The operations will be conducted throughout the City in an attempt to licensed establishments from selling tobacco products to minors. In addition, several operations will focus on adults who purchase tobacco products for minors.

ALTERNATIVES
Council has the following alternatives:

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative will allow for the Moreno Valley Police Department to conduct tobacco enforcement operations.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions. This alternative will not allow for the Moreno Valley Police Department to conduct tobacco enforcement operations.

FISCAL IMPACT
The three-year grant period begins in FY 2022/2023 with reimbursement distribution totaling, $156,400 cycling as follows:
 $49,600 in expenditures for FY22/23
 $52,100 in expenditures for FY23/24
 $54,700 in expenditures for FY24/25
Carryover procedures will occur through FY 24/25 to ensure reimbursement funds are available in each respective Fiscal Year.

Description Fund GL Account No. Type
(Rev/Exp)
FY 22/23
Budget
FY 22/23
Proposed
Amendment
FY 22/23
Amended
Budget
Tobacco Grant
Revenue
2300 60-69-XXXXX-486000 Rev $0 $156,400 $156,400
Tobacco Grant
Expense
2300 60-69-XXXXX6XXXXXRev $0 $156,400 $156,400
A.8
Packet Pg. 215

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Shanna Palau John Salisbury
Senior Contracts Analyst Chief of Police
Concurred By:

Chris Durham
Lieutenant

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Safety. Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. 2021-22 Tobacco Grant Award Letter_DOJ

2. 2021-22 Resolution_Tobacco Grant Award

3. 2021-22_MOU_Moreno Valley_Tobacco Grant

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval  Approved . 1/11/22 9:27 AM
City Attorney Approval  Approved .

City Manager Approval  Approved . 1/11/22 9:30 AM
A.8
Packet Pg. 216
ROB BONTA State of California
Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DIVISION OF OPERATIONS

TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM
P.O. BOX 160187
SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-0187
Telephone: (916) 210-6422
E-Mail Address: [email protected]
November 18, 2021
Felicia London, Administrator
City of Moreno Valley
22850 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Re: Tobacco Grant Award Notification FY 21/22

Dear Felicia London:

Congratulations! On behalf of the California Department of Justice, I am excited to inform you that your agency’s grant application for funds authorized under the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 has been approved for Funding in the amount of $156,400¹.

The California Department of Justice was excited to receive applications totaling over $71 million to support local law enforcement agencies in educating minors about the harms of tobacco products, enforcing state and local tobacco laws, and conducting retailer enforcement.

Consequently, some awards were approved with modifications.

In order to accept the award, your agency must, within 15 calendar days of the date of this letter, respond with a signed Letter of Intent (template attached) affirming either 1) your agency will seek a resolution to accept the award, if your agency has a governing body; or 2) no governing body exists and no resolution is required. The letter can be sent via email to [email protected] with subject line “FY 21-22_Letter of Intent_City of Moreno Valley” and/or hard copy to:

CA Department of Justice
Division of Operations
Tobacco Grant Program
P.O. Box 160187
Sacramento, CA 95816-0187
If the Letter of Intent is only being sent via hard copy, it must be postmarked within 15 days of the date of this letter. Upon receipt of the Letter of Intent, the Local Assistance Unit ¹Award amounts are subject to change due to appeals or declinations of awards.

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 2021-22 Tobacco Grant Award Letter_DOJ (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, November 18, 2021

within the California Department of Justice will provide documents as part of your grant agreement (Memorandum of Understanding, Handbook, etc.).

Also provided with the electronic version of this letter are the Award Summary and approved Budget Detail which will reflect any necessary modifications. If you wish to realign the approved funds, please reference the attached instruction sheet and return your revised Budget Detail with your letter of intent.

If you have any questions about this process, please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 210-7006 or at [email protected].

Sincerely,

STACY HEINSEN
Manager, Tobacco Grant Program

For ROB BONTA
Attorney General
A.8.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 2021-22 Tobacco Grant Award Letter_DOJ (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, Attachment “_“
1 Resolution No. 2022-____
Date Adopted: January 18, 2022
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TO ACCEPT GRANT
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $156,400 FROM THE STATE

OF CALFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF

ATTORNEY GENERAL, TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT

GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley is interested in participating in the Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant Program, which is made available through the California Healthcare Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 (Prop. 56) and administered by the State of California Department of Justice (DOJ) to support local efforts to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products to minors in the City; and WHEREAS, following the City’s submittal of proposal for the Program, the State of California DOJ offered to award $156,400 for the three-year grant program beginning December 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Grant funds will be used for Sheriff’s overtime costs related to tobacco enforcement operations; and
WHEREAS, in order to be considered eligible to receive grant funding, the City must submit a completed Grant Award Memorandum of Understanding to the State of California DOJ;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Manager or designated representative is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to accept grant funding in the amount of $156,400 from the State of California DOJ.

2. The City Manager or designated representative is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute the grant documents and to submit all documents, including, without limitation, contracts, amendments, extensions, and payment requests as appropriate to accept the funds under and comply with the conditions of the grant.

3. The City Manager or designated representative is hereby authorized and directed to establish all required accounts and make any and all expenditures, appropriations, transfers, and/or distributions of funds on behalf of the City as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

4. Grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant ongoing law A.8.b
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2021-22 Resolution_Tobacco Grant Award (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, 2 Resolution No. 2022-____
Date Adopted: January 18, 2022
enforcement expenditures.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2022.
___________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
City Attorney
A.8.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2021-22 Resolution_Tobacco Grant Award (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, 3 Resolution No. 2022-____
Date Adopted: January 18, 2022

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, Pat Jacquez-Nares, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. YYYY-___ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the _____ day of______, YYYY by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
A.8.b
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2021-22 Resolution_Tobacco Grant Award (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, DOJ-PROP56-2021-22-1-046

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

PURPOSE
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by the Department of Justice (hereinafter, “Department”) and the M (hereinafter, “Grantee”), to provide grant funds to Grantee for expenditure in compliance with the Grantee Handbook. The Grantee will expend funds for the purposes identified in the approved Summary of Award document to be funded under the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 (the “Act”), approved by the voters as Proposition 56.

The Request for Proposals, Grantee Handbook (dated March 2021), and Summary of Award document are hereby incorporated by reference into this MOU.

COST REIMBURSEMENT
The Department agrees to reimburse Grantee in arrears, for Grantee’s actual expenditures in performing the project or scope of work included in the approved Summary of Award document, upon receipt of invoices from Grantee and approval of the invoices by the Department, in accordance with the reimbursement procedures set forth in the Grantee Handbook.

BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current year and/or any subsequent years covered under the agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for this MOU, this MOU shall be of no further force and effect. In this event, the Department shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this MOU and Grantee shall not be obligated to continue performing any provisions of this agreement for which it would have been reimbursed.

If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted in the Budget Act for purposes of this MOU, the Department shall have the option to either cancel this MOU with no liability occurring to the Department, or offer an addendum to the Grantee to reflect the reduced amount.

ADMINISTRATION
Should Grantee fail to comply with this MOU, including any expenditures for purposes not permitted under the MOU, the Department may take one or more of the actions described under Noncompliance in the Grantee Handbook.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Addendum – No addendum or variation of the terms of this MOU is valid unless made in writing, and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.

Assignment – This MOU is not assignable by Grantee in whole or in part.

Indemnification – Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department, its officers, agents and employees from all claims, liabilities, or losses in connection with the performance of this MOU.

Termination – The Department may terminate this MOU and be relieved of any obligation to provide grant funds to Grantee should Grantee fail to perform the scope of work at the time and in the manner provided in this MOU.

A.8.c
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 2021-22_MOU_Moreno Valley_Tobacco Grant (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, DOJ-PROP56-2021-22-1-046

TERMS
Grant Duration: 12/1/2021 – 6/30/2025
Award Amount
Category of Expenditure
Budget
FY 2021-2022
Budget
FY 2022-2023
Budget
FY 2023-2024
Budget
FY 2024-2025
Personal Services $0 $0 $0 $0
Operating Expenses and Equipment $0 $49,600 $52,100 $54,700 Administrative Costs (Not to Exceed 5%) $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT $156,400
The time limit for reimbursements against this award ends 6/30/2025. Requests received after 7/15/2025 cannot be reimbursed by the Department.

GRANTEE CONTACT INFORMATION
Shanna Palau
Senior Contracts Analyst
City of Moreno Valley, Finance Department
22850 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos,
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
951-486-6788
[email protected]

AUTHORIZATION
The Department and Grantee, by their duly authorized officials, have executed this MOU on the respective dates indicated below. This MOU and any future addendums shall be mailed to the Division of Operations, Local Assistance Unit, Tobacco Grant Program, and will become fully executed upon completion of signatures from all parties.
___________________________________ ___________________ JOHN SALISBURY, CHIEF OF POLICE Date
Moreno Valley Sheriff’s Station
City of Moreno Valley
___________________________________ ___________________ MIKE LEE, CITY MANAGER Date
City Manager’s Office
City of Moreno Valley
___________________________________ ___________________ STACY HEINSEN, GRANT MGR. Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
__________________________________ ___________________
CHRIS RYAN, CHIEF Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
A.8.c
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 2021-22_MOU_Moreno Valley_Tobacco Grant (5648 : ACCEPTANCE OF TOBACCO LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD, Report to City Council
ID#5554 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Manuel A. Mancha, Community Development Director
AGENDA DATE: January 18, 2022
TITLE: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND
CHANGE OF ZONE AMENDING "MAP LCC-4: GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE" OF THE MORENO VALLEY GENERAL

PLAN AND THE CITY ZONING ATLAS, RESPECTIVELY,
PROPOSED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37944 FOR TWO
(2) LOTS, A PLOT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY
290,726 SQUARE FOOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING,
AND A PLOT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 98,877

SQUARE FOOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. ADOPT Resolution 2022-XX: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley CERTIFYING that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment PEN20-0118, Change of Zone PEN20- 0119, Tentative Parcel Map PEN20-0120, and Plot Plans PEN20-0121 and PEN20-0124 on file with the Community Development Department, and incorporated herein by this reference, was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the CEQA Guidelines, that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and that the document reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis, and ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the above-referenced Mitigated Negative Declaration; and

2. ADOPT Resolution 2022-XX: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley approving a General Plan Amendment based on the Recitals and Evidence contained in the Administrative Record and Findings as set for in the Resolution No. 2022-XX to amend the General Plan Land Use Map as described F.1
Packet Pg. 224

in the Resolution, based on the findings contained in the Resolution, and the revised Land Use Map; and

3. INTRODUCE and conduct the first reading by title only of Ordinance No. XXX, approving a Change of Zone PEN20-0119 to amend the City Zoning Atlas based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Ordinance No. XXX; and

4. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley approving Tentative Parcel Map 37944, PEN20-0120 based on the findings contained in this Resolution, and subject to the conditions of approval included as Exhibit A; and

5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, A Resolution of the City of the City of Moreno Valley approving Plot Plans PEN20-0121 and PEN20-0124 based on the findings contained in this Resolution, and subject to the conditions of approval included as Exhibit A; and

6. SCHEDULE the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. XXX for the next regular meeting.

SUMMARY
This staff report recommends approval of development applications for the Compass Danbe Project for the development of two light industrial buildings located on the south side of Alessandro Boulevard west of Frederick Street and east of Graham Street.

The recommended actions for the project also include a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Tentative Parcel Map and two Plot Plans for light industrial development.

BACKGROUND
The project was continued to a date uncertain by the City Council on October 5, 2021.

Required public noticing has been completed for this meeting.

As provided for in the California Government Code, a mandatory element of the General Plan may be amended no more than four times during one calendar year. The recommended action is for the City Council to approve the General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Element covering the land use designation change. This change will be the third amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the 2021 calendar year.

Planning Commission Recommendation
At its August 26, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approve the General Plan F.1
Packet Pg. 225

Amendment, Change of Zone, Tentative Parcel Map 37944, and two Plot Plans for the Compass Danbe project.

Prior to the Planning Commission meeting five (5) comment letters were received regarding the Project. Three did not raise any opposition to the Project. Two, one from South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and one from Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA) discussed concerns relating to several categories including air quality and truck traffic. A response to each comment submitted in the SCAQMD letter has been prepared and published. A response to comments for the GSEJA was not prepared, since the City received a withdrawal of the comment letter on September 2, 2021. The letters and response to comments are included in the attachments.

During the Planning Commission public hearing, there were seven commenters, six were in support and one was in opposition to the Project.

DISCUSSION
Project
The Applicant CDRE Holding 17, LLC (“Applicant”) is requesting approval of the following: a General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118), to change the land use designation of the Project site from Commercial to Business Park/Light Industrial, a Change of Zone (PEN20-0119), to amend the Zoning Atlas from Community Commercial District (CC) to Light Industrial (LI), a Tentative Parcel Map 37944 (PEN20- 0120) for two parcels, a Plot Plan (PEN20-0121) for a 290,726 square foot light industrial building and a Plot Plan (PEN20-0124), a Plot Plan for a 98,877 square foot light industrial building located on the south side of Alessandro Boulevard between Frederick Street and Graham Street, on parcels identified as Assessor Parcel Nos. 297- 170-002 and 003.

General Plan Amendment
The City’s General Plan is a comprehensive, long-term plan for the development of the City of Moreno Valley. The General Plan is at the top of the hierarchy of the City’s land use regulations, which means that the City’s zoning and other land use decisions must conform to the General Plan. A General Plan’s Land Use Element, which is referred to as the “Land Use & Community Character Element” in the City’s General Plan, must designate the proposed general distribution, location, and extent of land uses for housing; business; industry; open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, and enjoyment of scenic beauty; education; public buildings and grounds; waste disposal facilities; and other categories of public and private uses.

Under the General Plan, the Project Site’s land use designation is Commercial. The primary purpose of the Commercial land use designation is to allow for the development of land for business purposes, including but not limited to, retail stores, restaurants, banks, hotels, professional offices, personal services and repair services.

F.1
Packet Pg. 226

The Applicant is requesting, via A General Plan Amendment, that the Commercial land use designation be changed to Business Park/Light Industrial. The primary purpose of the Business Park/Light Industrial land use designation is to allow for the development of land for manufacturing, research and development, warehousing and distribution, office uses and other uses that support commercial activities. If the proposed General Plan Amendment is approved, the land use designation of the Project Site will remain consistent with adjacent parcels to the south and east, which fall within the Business Park/Light Industrial land use designation. On balance, the General Plan Amendment will increase the amount of land in the City with a Business Park/Light Industrial land use designation by approximately 17.67-acres, with a corresponding decrease in the amount of land within the City with a Commercial land use designation.

Change of Zone
In contrast to planning goals and objectives of the General Plan, which has a much broader connotation, zoning is a separation of the City into zoning districts, and includes the regulation of buildings and structures, according to their construction, and the nature and extent of their use.

Consistent with the Project Site’s General Plan Commercial land use designation, the Project Site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC). The Applicant, however, want to also change the Project Site’s zoning to Light Industrial (LI). The primary purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) zone is to provide for the development of light manufacturing, light industrial, research and development, warehousing and distribution and multitenant industrial uses, as well as certain supporting administrative and professional offices and commercial on a limited basis. While the purpose of the two zoning districts are different, the proposed Change of Zone will be consistent with adjacent parcels to the south since those parcels are developed with light industrial buildings and zoned Light Industrial District (LI).

Tentative Parcel Map
The Applicant is also requesting the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map 37944 to subdivide a single parcel into two separate parcels for Building #1 and Building #2.

The Subdivision Map Act distinguishes between a subdivision consisting of five or more parcels, which requires a tentative and final map, and a subdivision consisting of only four or fewer parcels, which merely requires a parcel map. However, local ordinances may require a tentative map for subdivisions of four or fewer parcels, which is what is required under the City’s Municipal Code. When a tentative map is involved, no grading or construction work shall be performed until the tentative map and the improvement plans for such work have been approved by the appropriate approving authority of the City.

Plot Plans
The Applicant is requesting approval of two separate Plot Plans. The purpose of a Plot Plan is to provide a mechanism by which new construction and design of industrial, F.1
Packet Pg. 227

commercial or multiple-family residential projects can be reviewed.

The Applicant is proposing the construction of two light industrial buildings, one approximately 290,726 square feet in size and one approximately 98,877 square feet in size (“Project”) with associated parking, landscape improvements and off-site public improvements.

The current proposal anticipates both buildings will be constructed in conjunction with each other. However, should one building be delayed, all on-site and off-site improvements shall be constructed with the first building.

In approving a plot plan, the approving authority shall impose conditions of approval for the project regarding on-site improvements, off-site improvements, the manner in which the site is used and any other conditions as may be deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare and ensure that the project will be developed in accordance with the purpose and intent of the City’s regulations as set forth in Title 9 (Planning and Zoning).

Surrounding Vicinity
The Project Site is located in the center of the block on the southside of Alessandro Boulevard between Frederick Street and Graham Street.

The property across the street from the Project Site on the northside of Alessandro Boulevard is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Residential 20 (R20), and Residential 5 (R5), and is developed as such. The property west of the Project Site is vacant and unimproved and it is zoned Community Commercial (CC). The property south of the Project Site is developed with light industrial buildings and zoned Light Industrial District (LI). To the east of the Project Site, the land is vacant and unimproved and zoned Business Park-Mixed Use District (BPX) and Community Commercial (CC).

Access/Parking
Access to the Project Site will be from three new driveways along Alessandro Boulevard. All three driveways will be right-in and right-out, with only two driveways designed to accommodate truck traffic.

The Project’s proposed truck and automobile parking exceed the Municipal Code’s parking standards for such projects. Overall, a total of 217 parking spaces will be provided for both buildings which include standard automobile, ADA, EV, EVCS and Clean Air spaces, with 44-truck stalls in the truck court. Bicycle parking will also be provided as required by the City’s applicable standards.

Design/Landscaping
The proposed light industrial type buildings incorporate a contemporary architectural design. Dark bronze metal tower elements at the building corners provide a focal point with textured concrete sections, glass, tile and various awning types, bringing an office aesthetic to the buildings. The elements are included on the side elevations for F.1
Packet Pg. 228

continuity of the buildings. The colors of off-white, taupe and warm grey provide the background for the dark bronze metal tower and brown metal window treatments, which include flat awnings above the pained windows and elongated awnings at intervals, which break up the massing of the buildings.

Extensive landscaping is provided along the building frontage in addition to the required front set back and right-of-way landscaping which includes plant, ground covers, street trees and on-site trees.

Environmental
An Initial Study was prepared by T&B Planning, Inc., in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study examined the potential Project impacts on the environment. The Initial Study/Mitigation Negative Declaration (IS/MND) provides information in support of the finding that a Mitigated Negative Declaration serves as the appropriate CEQA documentation for the proposed Project in that the proposed Project, with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, will not have a significant effect on the environment.

Technical studies prepared in support of the IS/MND include the following: Air Quality Impact Analysis, Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment, MSHCP General Biological Resources Assessment & Compliance Analysis, Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Impact Analysis, MSHCP Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation, Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report, Least Bell’s Vireo Focused Survey Report, Phase I Cultural Resources Survey, Energy Analysis, Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Greenhouse Gas Analysis, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Paleontological Assessment, Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Preliminary Drainage Study, Noise Impact Analysis, Traffic Analysis, and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis. The electronic files for the IS/MND with appendices are attached to this staff report.

Public Notices
The City provided the requisite notices related to the Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration as required under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Public Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR § 15000 et seq., and the City of Moreno Valley’s “Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of CEQA,” as discussed below.

There was no notice requirement for an Initial Study until the City determined that it would prepare either a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report. If the City concluded that a Negative Declaration was required, it was required to immediately send out a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. (14 Cal Code Regs. § 15072.) The City was required provide the Notice by:

1. Mailing the Notice to the last known name and address of all organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice in writing; and
F.1
Packet Pg. 229

2. Giving notice by at least one of the following:
a. Publication at least one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the area;
b. Posting of notice on and off site in the area where the project is to be located;
or
c. Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property contiguous to the project, with the owners of such property being identified as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll.

The City was also required to send a copy of the Notice of Intent to each responsible agency. (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15073.) The review period must be at least 20 days, but the City provided 30 days. If any agency provided comments, the City was required to also give notice of any public hearing on the project to the commenting agency.

Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) provides in part that the public review period for a proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration shall be not less than twenty (20) days.

However, when a proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies, the public review period shall not be less than thirty (30) days, unless a shorter period, not less than twenty (20) days, is approved by the State Clearinghouse.

The following records, which are available to review in the Planning Division and which are part of the Administrative Record for the Project, demonstrate that the City complied with all the aforementioned notice requirement under CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines:
1) Public Agency Mailing List; 2) Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent; 3) Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent filed with the County; 4) Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent filed with the Department of Fish & Game; 5) Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent submitted to Press Enterprise Newspaper; 6) State Clearinghouse confirmation of receipt; 7) San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Comment Letter, dated 08/25/2021; 8) South Coast Air Quality Management District Comment Letter dated 08/17/2021; 9) March Joint Powers Authority Comment Letter dated 08/05/2021; 10) Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance Comments Letters, dated 02/20/2021, 08/26/2021 and 09/02/2021, respectively; 11) Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice; 12) Property Owner List; 13) Planning Commission Staff Report; and 14) City Council Public Hearing Notice.

Because the City is a local agency, within five working days after the approval of the project for which the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared becomes final, a Notice of Determination must be filed with the County Clerk. (Pub Res C § 21152; 14 Cal Code Regs. § 15075.) Since this Project has not received final approval, there is currently no Notice of Determination.

Moreover, the Project Application, Planning Commission Meeting Agenda, Planning Commission Staff Report and this Staff Report indicate that Project includes F.1
Packet Pg. 230

applications for the following entitlements: 1) General Plan Amendment; 2) Zone Change; 3) Tentative Tract Map; and 4) Plot Plans.

In addition to providing the notices required under CEQA and/or the CEQA Guidelines, the Moreno Valley Municipal Code requires that public notice be provided for the above entitlement applications as follows:

Section 9.02.040 – General Plan Amendments
For General Plan Amendments, the Planning Commission must conduct a public hearing which requires notice of the Public Hearing to be provided in accordance with Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures).

Section 9.02.050 – Amendments to Zoning Districts or Other Provisions of Title 9 For Amendment to Zoning Districts (Zone Changes), the Planning Commission must conduct a public hearing which requires notice of the Public Hearing to be provided in accordance with Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures).

Section 9.02.070 – Plot Plan
Except as otherwise provided, authority for approval of plot plans is vested with the Planning Commission. Plot plan applications shall be subject to major development review procedures pursuant to Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures).

Section 9.14.050 – Processing of Tentative Maps
For tract maps, a public hearing shall be held before the Planning Commission with notice of the public hearing being provided pursuant to Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures), as amended by Ordinance No. 959.

Section 9.02.20 - Public Hearing and Notification Procedures Section 9.02.20, as amended by Ordinance No. 959, provides in relevant part that whenever a public hearing is required, notice of public hearings shall be given by: 1) Publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the city at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2) Mailing, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the public hearing, to all owners of property within a radius of six hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property involved in the application. For this purpose, the last known name and address of each property owner, as contained in the records of the latest equalized Riverside County assessor rolls, shall be used. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to this subsection is greater than one thousand (1,000), in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, notice may be provided by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing.

F.1
Packet Pg. 231

In addition, Section 9.02.200 provides notice of the public hearing must be mailed at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the public hearing, or delivering at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the public hearing, to each local agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, or other essential services or facilities to the project whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be significantly affected.

The notice of the public hearing must also be mailed, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the public hearing, to any person who has filed a written request with the community development director and has provided the community development director with a self-addressed stamped envelope for that purpose.

Notice of both the Planning Commission Public Hearing and City Council Public Hearing was provided pursuant to Section 9.02.200.

The following records, which are available to review in the Planning Division and which are part of the Administrative Record for the Project, demonstrate that the City complied with all the aforementioned notice requirements set forth in the Municipal Code: 1) Public Agency Mailing List; 2) Public Hearing Notices; 3) Property Owner List; and 4) Planning Commission Staff Report.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Conduct a public hearing and take action to certify the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program, approve the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Tentative Parcel Map 37944 and approve both Plot Plans consistent with the Staff recommendations to the Planning Commission. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Conduct a public hearing on the Project and do not approve the applications.

Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable

NOTIFICATION
The public hearing notice was published on January 8, 2022 in the local Press Enterprise newspaper. Public notices were sent to all property owners within 600 feet of the project site on January 6, 2022, and posted on the site January 7, 2022.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Julia Descoteaux Manuel A. Mancha
Associate Planner Community Development Director
Concurred By:

Sean P. Kelleher
Planning Official
F.1
Packet Pg. 232

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness. Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 1.1: Proactively attract high-quality businesses.

Objective 1.3: Promote local hiring through the expansion of local, quality, high paying jobs, and workforce development efforts.

Objective 1.5: Showcase Moreno Valley’s unique assets.

Objective 2.5: Develop partnerships with local businesses and warehouse operators to reduce traffic related issues.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Resolution 2022- Initial Study

2. Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND

3. Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis

4. Appendix A2-HRA Report

5. Appendix B1-MSHCP Compliance Analysis

6. Appendix B2-JD Report

7. Appendix B3-MSHCP DBESP

8. Appendix B4-Burrowing Owl Survey Report

9. Appendix B5-Least Bells Vireo Survey Report

10.Appendix C-Phase I Cultural Resources Survey

11.Appendix D-Energy Analysis
F.1
Packet Pg. 233

12.Appendix E-Geotechnical Investigation

13.Appendix F-GHG Analysis

14.Appendix G-Phase I ESA

15.Appendix H-Paleontological Assessment

16.Appendix I1-PWQMP

17.Appendix J-Noise Study

18.Appendix K1-Traffic Impact Analysis

19.Appendix K2-VMT Assessment Compressed

20.Exhibit B to Resolution Initial Study MND-Hearing Newspaper notice

21.Exhibit C to Resolution Initial Study MMRP

22.Resolution 2022- General Plan Amendment

23.Ordinance XXX - Change of Zone

24.Resolution for Tentative Parcel Map 37944

25.Exhibit A to Resolution for Tentative Parcel Map 37944 - Conditions of Approval

26.Resolution 2022- Plot Plans

27.Exhibit A to Plot Plan Resolution - Conditions of Approval

28.600 Foot Mailing notice for City Council

29.Project Plans

30.Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions

31.PC Comment Letters

32.Comment letter 1_Keri Then 09262021- CC

33.SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval  Approved . 9/30/21 3:22 PM
City Attorney Approval  Approved .

City Manager Approval  Approved . 9/30/21 3:51 PM
HISTORY:
10/05/21 City Council CONTINUED
Next: 01/18/22
Mayor Gutierrez announced, at the Developer's request, Item No. F.1 be continued to the October 19th City Council meeting.

Mayor Gutierrez opened the Public Hearing at 6:04 p.m.
10/19/21 City Council CONTINUED
Next: 01/04/22
Council Member Marquez read a letter from Compass Danbe in which they requested a continuance of item No. F.1. Council Member Cabrera agreed to continue the item.

F.1
Packet Pg. 234

Interim City Attorney Quintanilla noted with a City Council comprised of three members, a quorum that was required to conduct a meeting was two members. He announced that the following items needed to be pulled from the agenda as they required three affirmative votes per the local rules of procedure for City Council meetings 3.3.2; A.5, A.7, A.8, A.9, A.11, B.4, and G.3. He confirmed that the items remaining on the agenda included A.2, A.3, A.4, A.6, A.10, B.2, B.5, B.6, C.1, C.2, C.3, D.1, D.2, D.3, E.1, E.2, E.3, F.2, G.1, and G.2.

F.1
Packet Pg. 235
1 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM FOR THE COMPASS DANBE CENTERPOINTE PROJECT

LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ALESSANDRO BOULEVARD
BETWEEN FREDERICK STREET AND GRAHAM STREET (APN’S 297-
170-002 AND 003)
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for local projects that are subject to requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, CDRE Holdings, LLC., (“Developer”) is seeking approval for the development of the Compass Danbe Centerpointe project, a two building light industrial complex on a 17.67-acre site that includes: 1) a General Plan Amendment (GPA) (PEN20-0118) amending the “Land Use Map” (Map LCC-4) of the Moreno Valley General Plan to change the land use designation of the Project site from Commercial to Business Park; 2) a Change of Zone (PEN20-0119) to change the zoning designation of the site from Community Commercial District (CC) to Light Industrial District (LI); 3) a Tentative Parcel Map (PEN20-0120) for two lots; 4) a Plot Plan (PEN20-0121) for an approximately 290,726 square foot light industrial building; 5) a Plot Plan (PEN21-0124) for an approximately 98,877 square foot light industrial building with associated public improvements located on the south side of Alessandro Boulevard between Frederick Street and Graham Street (APN’S 297-170-002-003); and
WHEREAS, the proposed “Project” shall include not only the General Plan Amendment (GPA) (PEN20-0118), Change of Zone (PEN20-0119), Tentative Parcel Map (PEN20-0120), and two Plot Plans (PEN20-0121 and PEN20-0124), but also a corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect the proposed changes in the zoning classification and/or redistricting associated with the General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, Planning Division Staff completed an environmental assessment for the proposed Project, and, based on the assessment, decided to prepare an Initial Study (“IS”) and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) in accordance with Section 6 (ND Procedures) of the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 – 15075; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was duly noticed and circulated for public review for a period of 30 days commencing on July 26, 2021, through August 25, 2021; and
F.1.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Resolution 2022- Initial Study [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) 2 WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) that includes a program for reporting on and monitoring Project mitigation measures was prepared for the proposed Project and noticed with the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, on August 26, 2021 a hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission whereby the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution 2021-24, a recommendation that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Plan and approve the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2021, the City Council continued the item to a date uncertain.

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, a hearing was conducted by the City Council to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approve the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, in the exercise of its own independent judgment, the City Council has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will reduce the environmental impacts of the Project to levels of insignificance and that there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all the evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study prepared for the proposed Project, attached hereto as Exhibit A;
(b) Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration/Newspaper Notice, attached hereto as Exhibit B;
(c) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit C; (d) Staff Report prepared for the City Council’s consideration and all documents, records and references related thereto, and Staff’s presentation at the public hearing; and
F.1.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Resolution 2022- Initial Study [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) 3 (e) Testimony, comments and correspondence from all persons that were provided at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Section 3. Findings
That based on the content of the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) That the City has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the whole record before it, including, the Initial Study and comments received;
(b) That the proposed mitigation measures will reduce all environmental impacts of the proposed Project to levels of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment;
(c) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines consistent the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. (d) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City as lead agency for the proposed Project; and
(e) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are adequate to serve as the required CEQA environmental documentation for the proposed Project.

Section 4. Adoption
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record and Findings, as set forth herein, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study attached hereto as Exhibit A and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit C.

Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions as heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 6. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

F.1.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Resolution 2022- Initial Study [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) 4 Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption.

Section 8. Certification
That the City Clerk for the City Council shall certify to the passage of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS ___ day of _____________, 2022

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL
_________________________
Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez,
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
_________________________
Pat Jacquez-Nares, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla,
Interim City Attorney
Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study Exhibit B: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration / Newspaper Notice Exhibit C: Mitigation Monitoring Plan
F.1.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Resolution 2022- Initial Study [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Exhibit A

INITIAL STUDY
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass

CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

FOR THE

COMPASS DANBE CENTERPOINTE PROJECT
General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118)
Change of Zone (PEN20-0119)
Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120)
Plot Plan (PEN20-0121 & PEN20-0124)
July 2021
Lead Agency

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Prepared By
T&B PLANNING, INC.
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, CA, 92602
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project i City of Moreno Valley

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION..................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: .............................................2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:.....................................................26 DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency): ......................................................26 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: .....................................................................27 ISSUES & SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES:.............................................................28 I. AESTHETICS ......................................................................................................28 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES...................................................30 III. AIR QUALITY......................................................................................................31 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...............................................................................37 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES..................................................................................43 VI. ENERGY .............................................................................................................44 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ......................................................................................46 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .....................................................................50 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS......................................................52 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY...............................................................56 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING...............................................................................60 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.....................................................................................60 XIII. NOISE .................................................................................................................61 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING...........................................................................66 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................66 XVI. RECREATION .....................................................................................................68 XVII. TRANSPORTATION ...........................................................................................68 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................................72 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................................75 XX. WILDFIRE ...........................................................................................................79 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE...................................................79

FIGURES
Figure 1 Regional Map ............................................................................................................11 Figure 2 Vicinity Map ...............................................................................................................12 Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map ...........................................................................................13 Figure 4 Existing General Plan................................................................................................14 Figure 5 Existing Zoning..........................................................................................................15 Figure 6 Aerial Photograph......................................................................................................16 Figure 7 Site Photographs.......................................................................................................17 Figure 8 General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118)................................................................. 18 Figure 9 Change of Zone (PEN20-0119).................................................................................19 Figure 10 Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120).......................................................20 Figure 11 Site Plan.................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 12 Architectural Elevations.............................................................................................22 Figure 13 Conceptual Landscape Plan .....................................................................................23 Figure 14 Conceptual Utilities Plan ...........................................................................................24 Figure 15 Conceptual Grading Plan..........................................................................................25 F.1.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 1 City of Moreno Valley

MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION FOR COMPASS

DANBE CENTERPOINTE PROJECT
Project Description:

The Compass Danbe Centerpointe project comprises a proposal for a General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118); Change of Zone (PEN20-0119); Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120); and two Plot Plans (PEN20-0121 and PEN20-0124) that provide for the development of an approximately 17.7-acre property with two light industrial buildings with a total combined building floor area of 389,603 square feet. The Project also would include cargo loading areas at each building (within an enclosed truck court with loading docks on the south sides of the proposed buildings), parking areas, landscaping, signage, and lighting.

Project Location:

The Project site is located south of Alessandro Boulevard, between Frederick Street and Graham Street, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (APNs: 297-170-002 and -003).

Project Proponent:

Mark Bachli
CDRE Holdings 17 LLC
523 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Findings:

It is hereby determined that, based on the information contained in the attached Initial Study, the Project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment.

Mitigation Measures:

No. Mitigation Measure
BR-1 Within 30 days prior to grading, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey of suitable habitat on site and make a determination regarding the presence or absence of the burrowing owl. The determination shall be documented in a report and shall be submitted, reviewed, and accepted by the City of Moreno Valley prior to the issuance of a grading permit and subject to the following provisions:
a) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies no burrowing owls on the property a grading permit may be issued without restriction. b) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies the presence of at least one individual but less than three (3) mating pairs of burrowing owl, then prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the commencement of grounddisturbing activities on the property, the qualified biologist shall passively or actively relocate any burrowing owls. Passive relocation, including the required use of one-way doors to exclude owls from the site and the collapsing of burrows, will occur if the biologist determines that the proximity and availability of alternate habitat is suitable for successful passive relocation. Passive relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol and shall only occur between September 15 and February 1. If proximate alternate habitat is not present as determined by the biologist, active relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol. The biologist shall confirm in writing that the species has fledged the site or been relocated prior to the issuance of a grading permit. c) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies the presence of three (3) or more mating pairs of burrowing owl, the requirements of MSCHP SpeciesF.1.b Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 2 City of Moreno Valley No. Mitigation Measure
Specific Conservation Objectives 5 for the burrowing owl shall be followed.

Objective 5 states that if the site (including adjacent areas) supports three (3) or more pairs of burrowing owls and supports greater than 35 acres of suitable habitat, at least 90 percent of the area with long-term conservation value and burrowing owl pairs will be conserved onsite until it is demonstrated that Objectives 1-4 have been met. A grading permit shall be issued, either:
i) Upon approval and implementation of a property-specific Determination of Biologically Superior Preservation (DBESP) report for the burrowing owl by the CDFW; or
ii) A determination by the biologist that the site is part of an area supporting less than 35 acres of suitable Habitat, and upon passive or active relocation of the species following accepted CDFW protocols. Passive relocation, including the required use of one-way doors to exclude owls from the site and the collapsing of burrows, will occur if the biologist determines that the proximity and availability of alternate habitat is suitable for successful passive relocation. Passive relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol and shall only occur between September 15 and February 1. If proximate alternate habitat is not present as determined by the biologist, active relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol. The biologist shall confirm in writing that the species has fledged the site or been relocated prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

BR-2 All vegetation clearing and ground disturbance shall be prohibited during the bird nesting season (February 1 through September 15), unless a nesting bird survey is completed in accordance with the following requirements:
a) A bird nesting survey of the Project Site, including suitable habitat within a 100- foot radius, shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within five (5) days prior to initiating vegetation clearing or ground disturbance at the respective property.

A copy of the nesting bird survey results report shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley.
b) If the survey does not identify the presence of any active nests, then construction activities can proceed without restriction. c) If the survey identifies the presence of active nests, then the qualified biologist shall provide the City with a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and a species-appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from substantial adverse direct and/or indirect impacts. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be subject to review and approval by the City but shall be no less than a 100-foot radius around the nest for nonraptor species and no more than a 500-foot radius around the nest for raptor species and any endangered, threatened, or candidate species. i) The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., bird protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species, until after the nest becomes inactive (or the nest has failed), the young have fledged, the young are no longer being fed by the parents, the young have left the area, or the young will no longer be impacted by the activities. ii) In the event that a nest is abandoned despite efforts to minimize disturbance and, if the nestlings are still alive, the Project Applicant/Developer shall contact the California Department of Fish and F.1.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 3 City of Moreno Valley No. Mitigation Measure
Wildlife (CDFW) and, subject to CDFW approval, fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release of captive reared young) of the nestling(s).

BR-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall obtain all applicable permits for impacts to jurisdictional features, which may include a 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW and a 401 Certification issued by the RWQCB pursuant to the California Water Code Section 13260. In addition, the Project Applicant shall purchase a minimum of 0.81-acre of re-establishment credits (a 1:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio for impacts to wetland meadow habitat) and

0.82-acre of rehabilitation credits (a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio for impacts to black willow riparian woodland and disturbed wetland-cattail habitats). Habitat mitigation credits can be purchased either at an approved Habitat Mitigation Bank (e.g., Riverpark Mitigation Bank) or via an In-Lieu Fee Program (e.g., RiversideCorona Resource Conservation District and the Southwest Resource Management Association Santa Ana River Watershed In-Lieu Fee Program). Approval to purchase the mitigation credits must be granted in advance by the resource agencies. The Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Moreno Valley that the applicable permits have been obtained and that the required habitat mitigation credits have been purchased prior to issuance of grading permits.

GEO-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Moreno Valley that a qualified paleontologist has been retained by the Project Applicant to conduct monitoring of excavation activities and has the authority to halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected paleontological resources are unearthed.

GEO-2 The paleontological monitor shall conduct full-time monitoring during grading and excavation operations in undisturbed, very old alluvial fan sediments at depths exceeding five feet below the existing ground surface and shall be equipped to salvage fossils if they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The paleontological monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow of removal of abundant and large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have a low potential to contain or yield fossil resources.

GEO-3 Recovered specimens shall be properly prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including screen washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates, if necessary. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage, such as the Western Science Museum in Hemet, California, is required for significant discoveries.

GEO-4 A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance shall be prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered, if any, and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record the original location of the specimens. The report shall be submitted to the City of Moreno Valley prior to building final.

TCR-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all mass grading and trenching activities.

The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in F.1.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 4 City of Moreno Valley No. Mitigation Measure
AB52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52.

Details in the Plan shall include:
a) Project grading and development scheduling;
b) The Project archeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) as defined in MM TCR1 shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an asneeded basis; c) The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

TCR-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians for tribal monitoring. The Developer is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the tribes of all mass grading and trenching activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. If the Native American Tribal Representatives suspect that an archaeological resource may have been unearthed, the Project Archaeologist or the Tribal Representatives shall immediately redirect grading operations in a 100-foot radius around the find to allow identification and evaluation of the suspected resource. In consultation with the Native American Tribal Representatives, the Project Archaeologist shall evaluate the suspected resource and make a determination of significance pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2.

TCR-3 In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 5 City of Moreno Valley No. Mitigation Measure
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to MM TCR-1. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in MM TCR-1.

TCR-4 The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan:
“If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during grounddisturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find." TCR-5 If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site, work in the affected area must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration, and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in MM TCR-1 before any further work commences in the affected area.

TCR-6 If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains (California Public Resources Code 5097.98).

Attachments:

1. Initial Study

2. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 2 City of Moreno Valley

INITIAL STUDY (IS) FOR

COMPASS DANBE CENTERPOINTE

PROJECT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

1. Project Case Number(s): General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118); Change of Zone (PEN20-0119); Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120); and Plot Plans (PEN20- 0121 and PEN20-0124)

2. Project Title: Compass Danbe Centerpointe

3. Public Comment Period: July 26, 2021 to August 25, 2021

4. Lead Agency: City of Moreno Valley
Julia Descoteaux, Associate Planner
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
(951) 413-3209
[email protected]

5. Documents Posted At:
a. City of Moreno Valley Planning Division Counter, 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92553
b. Moreno Valley Library, 25480 Alessandro Boulevard, Moreno Valley, CA 92553 c. City’s website: http://www.moreno-valley.ca.us/cdd/documents/about-projects.html

6. Prepared By: T&B Planning, Inc.

David Ornelas
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, CA, 92602
(714) 505-6360 x 102
[email protected]

7. Project Sponsor:

Applicant/Developer Property Owner
Mark Bachli Vir Prabhu Dhalla
CDRE Holdings 17, LLC Moreno Valley Centerpointe, LLC
523 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(c/o CDRE Holdings 17, LLC)
523 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 428-3302 (310) 428-3302
[email protected] [email protected]

8. Project Location: The Project site is located in the central-western portion of the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The Project site is located south of Alessandro Boulevard, between Frederick Street and Graham Street (APNs: 297-170-002 and -003).

Refer to Figure 1, Regional Map; Figure 2, Vicinity Map; and Figure 3, USGS Topographic Map.

9. General Plan Designation: Commercial. Refer to Figure 4, Existing General Plan.

10. Specific Plan Name and Designation: N/A
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 3 City of Moreno Valley

11. Existing Zoning: Community Commercial. Refer to Figure 5, Existing Zoning.

12. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Refer to Figure 6, Aerial Photograph and Figure 7, Site Photographs):

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Project
Site Undeveloped Commercial Community Commercial
North Residential Residential: Max 5 du/ac;
Residential: Max 20 du/ac
Residential 5;
Residential 20
South Industrial Business Park/Light
Industrial Light Industrial
East Commercial and
Undeveloped
Business Park/Light
Industrial; Commercial
Business Park-Mixed Use;
Community Commercial
West Undeveloped Commercial
Community Commercial
with Mixed-Use
Institutional Anchor
Overlay

13. Project Description: The Compass Danbe Centerpointe project (hereafter, “Project”) comprises a proposal for a General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118); Change of Zone (PEN20-0119); Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120); and Plot Plans (PEN20- 0121 and PEN20-0124) that provides for the development of two light industrial buildings located south of Alessandro Boulevard, between Frederick Street and Graham Street. The components of the proposed Project are summarized on the following pages.

General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118) would amend the City of Moreno Valley General Plan Land Use Map to change the land use designation for the entire Project site from “Commercial” to “Business Park/Light Industrial.” Refer to Figure 8, General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0118).

Change of Zone (PEN20-0119) would amend the City of Moreno Valley Zoning Map to change the zoning designation for the entire Project site from “Community Commercial” to “Light Industrial.” Refer to Figure 9, Change of Zone (PEN20-0119).

Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120) would relocate the existing property line so that Building 1 and Building 2 would be placed upon separate parcels and, also, would grant various easements for public access (i.e., public sidewalks) and public utilities. Refer to Figure 10, Tentative Parcel Map No. 37944 (PEN20-0120).

Plot Plans (PEN20-0121 and PEN20-0124) provide specific development plans for two industrial warehouse buildings (Buildings 1 and 2). Building 1, located on the western portion of the Project site, contains approximately 290,726 square feet (s.f.) of building floor area, including 280,726 s.f. of warehouse space, 5,000 s.f. of office space, and 5,000 s.f. of mezzanine. Building 2, located on the eastern portion of the Project site, contains approximately 98,877 s.f. of building floor area, including 93,77 s.f. of warehouse space, 2,500 s.f. of office space, and 2,500 s.f. of mezzanine. The total combined building floor area for Building 1 and Building 2 is approximately 389,603 s.f. Both buildings include outdoor employee break areas with tables and seating; provided along the eastern side of Building 1 and along the western side of Building 2. The site plan for the Project is illustrated on Figure 11, Site Plan.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 4 City of Moreno Valley Vehicular access to the Project site is provided by three proposed driveways onto Alessandro Boulevard. The middle driveway would be accessible to only passenger vehicles and the westernmost driveway and easternmost driveway would be accessible to both passenger vehicles and trucks. All driveways would be restricted to right turn movements when entering/exiting the site. Sight distance at each Project driveway will be reviewed by the City of Moreno Valley at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans to ensure that standard Caltrans and City of Moreno Valley sight distance standards are met.

Parking and Loading
The Project provides a range of parking and loading options across the Project site.

Buildings 1 and 2 both provide enclosed truck courts on the south sides of the respective buildings. The truck court for Building 1 includes 32 loading bays and 34 truck trailer parking stalls; the truck court for Building 2 includes 10 loading bays and 10 truck trailer parking stalls. Neither truck court would be visible from Alessandro Boulevard. Building 1 also provides 144 passenger vehicle parking spaces (distributed along the north and east side and southeast corner of the building) while Building 2 provides 73 passenger vehicle parking spaces along the north and west sides and southeast corner of the building). Bicycle parking spaces (“racks”) would be provided at the northeast corners of Building 1 (4 racks) and Building 2 (2 racks) in conformance with Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section

9.11.060(B)(1) which requires bicycle parking spaces be provided at a rate equal to five percent of the total required parking spaces.

Architecture
Figure 12, Architectural Elevations, depicts the Project’s architectural design. Building 1 would have a maximum height of approximately 46 feet (measured from finished floor to the top of the parapets) and Building 2 would have a maximum height of approximately 46 feet (measured from finished grade to the top of the parapets). Both buildings are proposed to be constructed with painted concrete tilt-up panels and low reflective, blue-glazed glass.

Articulated building elements, include parapets with a varied roofline, wall recesses, awnings, and mullions are proposed as decorative elements. The exterior color palette for Buildings 1 and 2 are comprised of various neutral, earth-toned colors, including shades of white, beige, gray, and dark brown.

Prior to the issuance of building permits to construct the Project, the Project Applicant would be required to submit construction architecture documents/plans to the City of Moreno Valley for review and approval. The construction documents/plans would be required to comply with the City of Moreno Valley Building Code, which is based on the California Building Code and is included in Chapter 8.20 of the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code.

Landscaping
Figure 13, Conceptual Landscape Plan, depicts the proposed landscape design for the Project. Proposed landscaping would be ornamental in nature and would feature trees, shrubs, and drought-tolerant accent plants in addition to a variety of groundcovers. Trees and groundcover would be concentrated along the Project site’s frontage with Alessandro Boulevard and along the Project site’s eastern and western boundaries. Landscaping also is massed at driveways, around the buildings, and in and around automobile parking areas.

Prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the proposed building, the Project Applicant would be required to submit final planting and irrigation plans to the City of Moreno Valley for review and approval. The plans are required to comply with Chapter 9.17 of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, which establishes requirements for landscape design, automatic irrigation system design, and water-use efficiency.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 5 City of Moreno Valley Project Improvements
Public Roadway Improvements
The Project includes the following public roadway improvements in conjunction with development of the Project site:

1. The Project Applicant would improve the south side of Alessandro Boulevard to its ultimate half-section width as a Divided Major Arterial along the Project site’s frontage.

With proposed improvements, the south side of the street would feature: a 55-footwide travel way (including the existing raised median), new curb and gutter, a 6-footwide sidewalk abutting the curb, and a bioretention swale.

2. The Project Applicant would construct three driveways along the northern Project site boundary onto Alessandro Boulevard (which would require striping for lane transitions).

3. The Project Applicant would remove an existing bus stop along the south side of Alessandro Boulevard at the approximate midpoint of the northern Project site boundary. The bus stop would not be replaced as the Project site does not meet City’s design requirements for a bus stop (the City’s standard for bus stops/turnouts is at the far side of an intersection near a controlled crosswalk, not mid-block which is where the Project site is located).

Water Infrastructure
Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) would provide water service to the Project site.

As depicted on Figure 14, numerous connection points are proposed to the existing water line installed beneath Alessandro Boulevard for indoor, outdoor (i.e., landscape irrigation), and fire protection (i.e., fire hydrant) services. All proposed water facilities would be designed and constructed in accordance with EMWD standards.

Sanitary Sewer Service
EMWD would provide wastewater conveyance services to the Project site. As shown on Figure 14, the Project would connect to the existing sewer line beneath the southern Project site boundary. All proposed wastewater facilities would be designed and constructed in accordance with EMWD’s standards.

Stormwater Drainage Infrastructure
As shown in Figure 14, Conceptual Drainage Plan, the Project’s on-site stormwater drainage system would consist of catch basins, underground storm drain pipes, bioretention swales, two underground detention basins, two modular wetlands units, and two sump pumps.

Runoff from the proposed Building 1 area would drain to a proposed underground detention system located in the southwest corner of the Project site, which would then be pumped to a proposed modular wetlands unit for water quality treatment purposes. Flows would then be conveyed westerly and then southerly via an existing 54-inch storm drain beneath the southwest corner of the Project site. Runoff from the proposed Building 2 area of the Project site would drain to a proposed underground detention system located in the southeast corner of the Project site, which would then be pumped to another proposed modular wetlands unit before being conveyed easterly to an existing 36-inch storm drain beneath the southeast corner of the Project site.

The Project also includes connections to the existing storm drain beneath Alessandro Boulevard to convey storm drain runoff from off-site tributary areas to the north through the Project site. Stormwater runoff from Alessandro Boulevard also would be conveyed through the Project site – after flowing through proposed bioretention swales abutting Alessandro F.1.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 6 City of Moreno Valley Boulevard. Off-site runoff flows conveyed through the Project site would discharge to existing storm drains at the southwest and southeast corners of the Project site.

Dry Utilities
Implementation of the Project would result in the installation of conduit for communications cabling along the Project site’s frontage with Alessandro Boulevard. Existing wooden power poles along the Project site would be removed as part of Project construction and the overhead electric transmission lines suspended on these poles would be undergrounded.

The removal of the power pokes and the undergrounding of the transmission lines would be performed in coordination with Moreno Valley Utility.

Earthwork and Grading
Physical disturbances necessary to implement the Project include grading of the entire Project site. As shown on Figure 15, Conceptual Grading Plan, the proposed Project would result in approximately 30,500 cubic yards of cut and 26,000 cubic yards of fill. Based on the expected shrinkage and compaction of on-site soils, earthwork activities are expected to balance and no import or export of soil materials would be required. When grading is complete, the Project site would have a slight downward slope from north to southeast. No manufactured slopes and no retaining walls are needed to implement the Project.

Construction Characteristics
Based on information provided by the Project Applicant, the Project is expected to be constructed over a period of approximately 190 work days (8 months). Site preparation would occur first, followed by mass-grading and installation of underground infrastructure.

Next, fine grading would occur, surface materials would be poured, and the proposed building would be erected, connected to the underground utility system, and painted. Lastly, landscaping, fencing, screen walls, lighting, signage, and other site improvements would be installed. For purposes of analysis in this MND, construction is assumed to commence in October 2021 and finish in June 2022. The estimated Project construction schedule, organized by construction stage, is summarized in Table 1, Estimated Construction Schedule.

Table 1: Estimated Construction Schedule
Phase Name Start Date End Date Days
Site Preparation 10/04/2021 10/15/2021 10
Grading 10/16/2021 11/26/2021 30
Building Construction 11/27/2021 06/24/2022 150
Paving 05/28/2022 06/24/2022 20
Architectural Coating 05/01/2022 06/24/2022 40
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-2)
Construction workers would travel to the site by passenger vehicle and materials deliveries would occur by medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Construction equipment is expected to operate on the Project site up to eight hours per day, six days per week. Even though construction activities are permitted to occur between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Mondays through Saturdays pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 11.80.030(D)(7), construction equipment is not in continual use and some pieces of equipment are used only periodically throughout a typical day of construction. Thus, eight hours of daily use per piece of equipment is a reasonable assumption. Should construction activities need to occur at night (such as concrete pouring activities which benefit from air temperatures that are lower than daytime temperatures), the Project Applicant would be required to obtain authorization F.1.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 7 City of Moreno Valley for nighttime work from the City of Moreno Valley as specified in Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 11.80.030(D)(7).

The composition of the construction equipment fleet that the Project Applicant intends to use to construct the warehouse building, which also is used for purposes of analysis is in this IS/MND, is summarized in Table 2, Estimated Construction Equipment Fleet.

Table 2: Estimated Construction Equipment Fleet
Phase Name Equipment Amount Hours Per
Day
Site Preparation
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Grading
Crawler Tractors 2 8
Excavators 2 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Scrapers 2 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Welders 1 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-3)
Operational Characteristics
At this time, the future occupant(s) of the Project is unknown. The Project Applicant expects that the building primarily would be occupied by warehouse distribution operators. The proposed buildings are designed with the potential to utilize up to 30 percent of their floor area for cold storage or refrigerated uses. The Project is expected to be operational 24 hours per day, seven days per week, with exterior loading and parking areas illuminated at night. Lighting would be subject to compliance with Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section

9.08.100, which states that all outdoor lighting associated with nonresidential uses shall be fully shielded and directed away from surrounding residential uses to reduce glare and light trespass, and shall not exceed one-quarter-foot-candle minimum maintained lighting measured from within five (5) feet of any property line.

The proposed warehouse buildings are designed such that business operations would be conducted within the enclosed building, with the exception of traffic movement, parking, and F.1.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 8 City of Moreno Valley the loading and unloading of tractor trailers at designated loading bays. As a practical matter, dock doors on industrial buildings are not occupied by a truck at all times of the day.

There are typically more dock door positions on industrial buildings than are needed for receiving and shipping volumes. The dock doors that are in use at any given time are usually selected based on interior building operation efficiencies. In other words, trucks ideally dock in the position closest to where the goods to be carried by the truck are inside the building. As a result, many dock door positions are frequently inactive throughout the day. The City of Moreno Valley will condition the Project to use outdoor cargo handling equipment (e.g., yard trucks, hostlers, yard goats, pallet jacks, forklifts) that is only powered by non-diesel engines (e.g., gasoline, natural gas, electric).

During operation, employees, visitors, and vehicles hauling goods will travel to and from the Project site on a daily basis. Project operations are calculated by a trip generation calculation study to generate approximately 742 vehicle trips per day, including 518 passenger vehicle trips and 224 truck trips. Pursuant to State law, on-road diesel-fueled trucks that would service the Project are required to comply with various air quality and greenhouse gas emission standards, including but not limited to the type of fuel used, engine model year stipulations, aerodynamic features, and idling time restrictions. Compliance with State law is mandatory and inspections of on-road diesel trucks subject to applicable State laws are conducted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

Project operations are expected to demand approximately 9,735 gallons of water per day and 30,090 gallons of wastewater per day (EMWD’s standard demand rates for industrial warehouse/distribution land uses are 550 gallons of water per acre per day and 1,700 gallons of wastewater per acre per day, respectively); 5,261,115 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per year; and 6,438,204 kilo-British thermal units (kBTU) of natural gas per year.

14. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
The City of Moreno Valley is required to consult with interested California Native American tribes regarding the Project pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52). The City contacted California Native American Tribes with traditional use areas that encompass or are in the vicinity of the Project site. The Project received requests for consultation from Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and San Manuel Band of Mission Indians. The City concluded consultation on June 16, 2021.

15. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):

Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Determination); Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit), Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (drainage infrastructure design); and Eastern Municipal Water District (domestic water and sewer system design/connections).

16. Other Technical Studies Referenced in this Initial Study (Provided as Appendices):

Technical Appendix A1: Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis Technical Appendix A2: Compass Danbe Centerpointe Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 9 City of Moreno Valley Technical Appendix B1: MSHCP General Biological Resources Assessment & Compliance Analysis Alessandro Project Site
Technical Appendix B2: Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Impact Analysis Alessandro Project Site
Technical Appendix B3: MSHCP Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation Alessandro Project Site
Technical Appendix B4: Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report Technical Appendix B5: Least Bell’s Vireo Focused Survey Report Technical Appendix C: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project
Technical Appendix D: Compass Danbe Centerpointe Energy Analysis Technical Appendix E: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation – Proposed Industrial Warehouse Building Development
Technical Appendix F: Compass Danbe Centerpointe Greenhouse Gas Analysis Technical Appendix G: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 17.7 Acres Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 297-170-002 and 297-170-003
Technical Appendix H: Paleontological Assessment for Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project
Technical Appendix I1: Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan Compass Danbe Centerpointe, Industrial Warehouse Facility, South side of Alessandro Blvd. between Frederick Street and Graham Street, City of Moreno Valley Technical Appendix I2: Preliminary Drainage Study Compass Danbe Centerpointe Technical Appendix J: Compass Danbe Centerpointe Noise Impact Analysis Technical Appendix K1: Alessandro Warehouse Traffic Analysis Technical Appendix K2: Alessandro Warehouse Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Analysis

17. Acronyms:

AB-# Assembly Bill
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
AQMP - Air Quality Management Plan
BMP Best Management Practice
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalFire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAPSSA Criteria Area Plant Special Survey Area
CARB California Air Resources Board
CDC California Department of Conservation
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIWMP Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan
CO Carbon Monoxide
CWA Clean Water Act
dBA A-weighted decibel
DBESP Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation DIF Development Impact Fee
DOD Department of Defense
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control
e.g. exempli gratia meaning “for example”
EAP Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project
EDR EnviroStar database
EIC Eastern Information Center
EMWD Eastern Municipal Water District
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 10 City of Moreno Valley EPA Environmental Protection Agency
et seq. et sequentes, meaning “and the following”
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
GCC Global Climate Change
GHG Greenhouse Gas
gpd Gallons per day
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HMBEP Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan
I-# Interstate
i.e. that is
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
kBTU kilo-British thermal units
kWh Kilowatt-hour
Leq Equivalent sound level
lbs/day pounds per day
MARB March Air Reserve Base
MARB/IPA March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MEIR Maximally Exposed Individual Receptor
MEIW Maximally Exposed Individual Worker
mgpd Million gallons per day
MSHCP Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MVFD Moreno Valley Fire Department
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NEPSSA Narrow Endemic Plant Special Survey Area
NOX Nitrogen Oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPL National Priority List
PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter (2.5 microns or smaller)
PM10 Fine Particulate Matter (10 microns or smaller)
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RTA Riverside Transit Authority
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SARW-ILFP Santa Ana River Watershed In-Lieu Fee Program SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SLF Sacred Lands Files
SOX Sulfur Oxides
SR-# State Route
SRA State Responsibility Area
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VdB Vibration Decibel
VMT Vehicle Miles Travelled
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds
WQMP Water Quality Management Plan
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass F.1.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20- F.1.b
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 27 City of Moreno Valley EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or another CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 28 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code § 21099 – Modernization of Transportation Analysis for Transit-Oriented Infill Projects – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
Response: Scenic resources within the City of Moreno Valley are identified as Box Springs Mountains, the Foothills, the Badlands, and Mount Russell and its foothills. According to General Plan Figure 7-2, Major Scenic Resources, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a designated scenic resource or within a view corridor for any of the designated scenic resources in the City (Moreno Valley, 2006a, Figure 7-2).

Scenic resources visible (at least partially) from public viewpoints adjacent to the Project site include Mount Russell (approximately 4.0 miles to the southeast and partially visible from Alessandro Boulevard) (Google Earth Pro, 2020). Under existing conditions, views of Mount Russell are largely obscured from Alessandro Boulevard due to intervening development and landscaping, topography, and atmospheric haze that is common in the Inland Empire throughout the year. The Project would not substantially alter any existing views of Mount Russell from Alessandro Boulevard. As stated above, views of Mount Russell from Alessandro Boulevard are largely obscured from the Project site by the existing warehouse abutting the southern Project site boundary and on-site landscaping (and, for parts of the year, atmospheric haze). The Project would construct buildings up to 46-feet-tall and install new landscaping on the Project site. The proposed building and site improvements would partially obscure views of Mount Russell from Alessandro Boulevard – although not substantially more than views are obscured under existing conditions – and views of the Mountains would continue to be available above the building.

Implementation of the Project would not result in any impacts to view corridors as identified in the City of Moreno Valley General Plan (Moreno Valley, 2006a, Figure 7-2). Additionally, implementation of the Project would not result in a substantial adverse impact to the general viewsheds of the scenic resources within the City. Therefore, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact associated with an adverse effect on a scenic vista.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
Response: The Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic highway corridor and there are no State-designated or eligible scenic highways within the vicinity of the Project site (Caltrans, 2019).

Additionally, the City of Moreno General Plan does not identify any Scenic Route within proximity to the Project site (Moreno Valley, 2006a, Figure 7-2). The nearest State-designated scenic highway to the Project site is a segment of State Route (SR-) 74 located approximately 9.3 miles southeast of the Project site; the Project site would not be visible from this SR-74 segment due to distance and intervening development/topography (Caltrans, 2019; Google Earth Pro, 2020). It should be noted, also, that an area of Interstate (I-) 15 near the above-named segment of SR-74 is eligible for consideration as a State scenic highway; however, the Project site would not be visible from this portion of I-15 due to distance and intervening development/topography (Caltrans, 2019; Google Earth Pro, 2020). Accordingly, the Project site is not located within a State scenic highway corridor and implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial effect on scenic resources within a State scenic highway corridor.

Thus, no impact to a State scenic highway would occur from implementation of the Project. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (Public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the project
is in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
Response: The Project site is located within an urbanized area, as defined by U.S. Census Bureau, and determined as part of the 2010 Census (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). Thus, pursuant to this threshold, F.1.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 29 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a potentially significant impact to visual character only would occur if the Project were to conflict with applicable zoning and/or other City of Moreno Valley regulations governing scenic quality.

Implementation of the proposed Project would result in the visual conversion of the site from vacant, undeveloped land to two industrial warehouse buildings with associated improvements including parking lots, drive aisles, utility infrastructure, landscaping, exterior lighting, and signage. The Project would be compatible with the size, scale, and aesthetic/decorative architectural and landscaping features of other existing light industrial/warehouse buildings constructed to the south and southwest of the Project site.

Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable development standards and design guidelines contained in the Moreno Valley Zoning Ordinance, which regulates the visual quality of new development and ensure that new development does not detract from any scenic attributes/qualities in the surrounding area. Because the Project site is located in an urbanized area and because the Project would not conflict with applicable regulations governing scenic quality, a less-thansignificant impact would occur from implementation of the Project. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Response: Under existing conditions, the Project site contains no sources of artificial lighting; however, street lights are present along the Project site’s frontage with Alessandro Boulevard. The Project Applicant proposes to develop the site with two industrial warehouse buildings and would introduce new lighting elements on-site to illuminate the parking areas, truck docking areas, and building entrances.

The Project Applicant would be required to comply with lighting requirements as set forth in the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code Sections 9.10.110 and 9.16.280. The Municipal Code lighting standards govern the placement and design of outdoor lighting fixtures to ensure adequate lighting for public safety while also minimizing light pollution and glare and precluding public nuisances (e.g., blinking/flashing lights, unusually high intensity, or needlessly bright lighting). The City would confirm compliance with applicable lighting requirements during future review of building permit applications/plans. Mandatory compliance with the Municipal Code would ensure that the Project would not introduce any permanent design features that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. This impact would be less than significant.

With respect to glare, a majority of Project building materials would consist of concrete panels, which are non-reflective. While window glazing has a potential to result in minor glare effects, such effects would not adversely affect daytime views of surrounding properties, including motorists along adjacent roadways, because the glass proposed for the Project would be low-reflective, proposed buildings would be set back from adjacent roadways at a distance, and proposed landscaping would provide a buffer between all proposed glass surfaces and the public right of way. Thus, glare impacts from proposed building elements would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element
- Figure 7-2 – Major Scenic Resources

2. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.110 – Performance Standards, Light and Glare • Chapter 9.16 – Design Guidelines

3. Google Earth Pro, https://earth.google.com/web/

4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Scenic Highway Program, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-livi-scenic-highways

5. U.S. Census Bureau Urbanized Area Reference Maps,
https://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/UAUC_RefMap/ua/ua75340_riverside-- san_bernardino_ca/DC10UA75340.pdf
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 30 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES – In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Response: The Project site is not utilized for agricultural purposes under existing conditions. According to mapping information available from the California Department of Conservation’s (CDC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project site is classified as “Farmland of Local Importance” (CDC, 2016). Accordingly, the Project site does not contain any lands mapped by the FMMP as “Prime Farmland,” “Unique Farmland,” or “Farmland of Statewide Importance” and, thus, implementation of the Project would not convert such Farmland to a non-agricultural use. No impact would occur.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act contract?
Response: The Project site is zoned for “Community Commercial” under existing conditions and would be re-zoned to “Light Industrial” as part of the Project; therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with zoning for agricultural use. Additionally, as disclosed in the City of Moreno Valley General Plan Final EIR, no land within the City – including the Project site – is under a Williamson Act Contract (Moreno Valley, 2006b, p. 5.8-6). Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not conflict with existing (or proposed) zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
Response: The Project site is not zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production, nor is it surrounded by forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production land. According to the City of Moreno Valley Zoning Map, there are no lands located within the City of Moreno Valley that are zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Therefore, the Project has no potential to conflict with any areas currently zoned as forest, timberland, or Timberland Production and would not result in the rezoning of any such lands. As such, no impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
Response: The Project site does not contain a forest and is not designated as forest land; therefore, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. As such, no impact would occur.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 31 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in the conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
Response: “Farmland” is defined in Section II (a) of Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines as “Prime Farmland,” “Unique Farmland” or “Farmland of Statewide Importance” (“Farmland”). As disclosed above under Response II(a), the Project would not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use.

As discussed under Responses II(c) and II(d), the Project would not convert forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur.

Sources:

1. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.8 – Agricultural Resources

2. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Chapter 9.03 – Residential District

3. Moreno Valley Zoning Map, http://www.moreno-valley.ca.us/cdd/pdfs/ZoningMap.pdf

4. California Department of Conservation – California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/
III. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Response: The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB or “Basin”). The SCAB encompasses approximately 6,745 square miles and includes Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The SCAB is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, respectively; and the San Diego County line to the south. In these areas, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards.

Historically and presently, State and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to meet the State and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. The current AQMP, the 2016 AQMP, was adopted by SCAQMD in March 2017. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). The Project’s consistency with these criteria is discussed below.

Consistency Criterion No. 1: The Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.

Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). As evaluated under Response III(c), below, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD localized emissions threshold for any criteria pollutant during any construction phase of the Project. Accordingly, localized criteria pollutant emissions from Project construction would not increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, and/or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 32 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The Project’s operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD localized emissions thresholds (refer to Response III(c), below); thus, long-term operation of the Project would not increase the frequency or severity of existing NAAQS and/or CAAQS violations, cause or contribute to new violations, and/or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.

Therefore, construction and operation of the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion and the impact would be less than significant.

Consistency Criterion No. 2: The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build-out phase.

The growth forecasts used in the AQMP to project future emissions levels are based in part on land use data provided by lead agency general plan documentation. Projects that propose to increase the intensity of use on a subject property may result in increased stationary area source emissions and/or vehicle source emissions when compared to the AQMP assumptions. If a project does not exceed the growth projections in the applicable local general plan, then the project is considered to be consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. The prevailing planning documents for the Project site is the City of Moreno Valley General Plan. The City of Moreno Valley General Plan Land Use Map designates the Project site for Commercial land use. The Project includes a request to change the existing General Plan land use designation for the Project site from Commercial to Business Park/Light Industrial, which, if approved, would result in a land use and development intensity that was not anticipated by the General Plan, and, by extension, the growth models that were used in the AQMP. Although the Project would not be consistent with the land use assumptions used in the AQMP, Project construction and operation would not exceed applicable SCAQMD regional or localized air quality significance thresholds. As such, the Project’s inconsistency with Consistency Criterion No. 2 would not result in a substantial adverse environmental impact.

For the reasons stated above, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse environmental impact due to an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, the creation creation of new violations, the delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP, or the exceedance of growth assumptions in the AQMP. As such, impacts would be less-than-significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
Response: The proposed Project has the potential to generate substantial pollutant concentrations during both construction activities and long-term operation. An Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, 2020a) and a Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (Urban Crossroads, 2020b) were prepared for the Project by Urban Crossroads, Inc. to evaluate potential criteria and hazardous air pollutant emissions that could result from the Project’s construction and operation. These reports are included as Technical Appendices A1 and A2 to this IS/MND and their findings are incorporated into the analysis presented herein.

The following analysis is based on the applicable significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD for regional criteria pollutant emissions (as summarized in Table 3-1 of Technical Appendix A1). This analysis assumes that the Project would comply with applicable, mandatory regional air quality standards, including: SCAQMD Rule 403, “Fugitive Dust;” SCAQMD Rule 431.2, “Sulfur Content of Liquid Fuels;” SCAQMD Rule 1113, “Architectural Coatings;” SCAQMD Rule 1186, “PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads, and Livestock Operations;” SCAQMD Rule 1186.1, “Less-Polluting Street Sweepers,” and Title 13, Chapter 10, Section 2485, Division 3 of the California Code of Regulations “Airborne Toxic Control Measure.”
For a detailed description of the health effects of air pollutants refer to Section 2.4 of the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis (Technical Appendix A1). In general, air pollutants have adverse effects to human health including, but not limited to, respiratory illness and carcinogenic effects; however, based F.1.b
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 33 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
on available modeling it is not feasible to correlate regional criteria pollutant emissions from development projects of the scale of the proposed Project to adverse health effects on a SCAB-wide level (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, pp. 10-16, 56-58). The potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse health effects from toxic air contaminant emissions is addressed under Response III(c), below.

Impact Analysis for Construction Emissions
For purposes of the construction emissions analysis, construction was conservatively expected to occur between October 2021 and June 2022. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) accounts for the implementation and enforcement of California’s progressively more restrictive regulatory requirements for construction equipment and the ongoing replacement of older construction fleet equipment with newer, less-polluting equipment. Thus, according to the CalEEMod, construction activities that occur in the near future are expected to generate more air pollutant emissions than the same activities that may occur farther into the future. Accordingly, in the event that the Project’s construction occurs at a later date than assumed in this air quality analysis, Project-related construction emissions are not expected to exceed the values presented herein (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, p. 38).

The calculated maximum daily emissions associated with Project construction are presented in Table 3, Summary of Construction-Related Emissions. The Project’s construction characteristics and construction equipment fleet assumptions used in the analysis were previously described above in the Project Description (see Tables 1 and 2).

Table 3: Summary of Construction-Related Emissions
Year Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
2021 5.43 61.02 32.00 0.10 14.04 6.81
2022 54.69 42.10 50.18 0.13 6.92 2.92
Winter
2021 5.43 61.02 31.86 0.09 14.04 6.81
2022 54.68 42.02 47.88 0.13 6.39 2.92
Maximum Daily Emissions 54.69 61.02 50.18 0.13 14.04 6.81 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-4)
As shown in Table 3, the Project’s daily construction emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOX) carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOX), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) would not exceed SCAQMD regional criteria thresholds and, thus, would be less than significant.

The SCAQMD considers any project-specific criteria pollutant emissions that exceed applicable SCAQMD significance thresholds also to be cumulatively-considerable. To put it another way, if a project does not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds, then SCAQMD considers that project’s air pollutant emissions to not be cumulatively-considerable. Thus, because Project construction would not exceed the SCAQMD regional criteria significance thresholds, implementation of the Project would not result in a cumulatively-considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, including any pollutants for which the SCAB does not attain applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards during construction.

Impact Analysis for Operational Emissions
Operational activities associated with the Project are expected to generate air pollutant emissions from the operation of motor vehicles (including trucks), landscape maintenance activities, application of architectural coatings, and the use of electricity and natural gas. Long term operational emissions associated with the Project are presented in Table 4, Summary of Peak Operational Emissions.

As summarized in Table 4, Project operational emissions of VOCs, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10 and PM2.5 would not exceed SCAQMD regional criteria thresholds. Accordingly, the Project would not emit substantial concentrations of these pollutants during long‐term operation and would not contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. The Project’s long‐term emissions of VOCs, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10 and PM2.5 would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 34 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 4: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions
Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Area Source 9.02 7.20E04 0.08 0.00 2.80E04

2.80E04
Energy Source 0.19 1.73 1.45 0.01 0.13 0.13
Mobile Source (Passenger Cars) 1.27 1.18 18.96 0.06 6.56 1.76 Mobile Source (Trucks) 1.26 45.31 9.68 0.21 8.51 2.79
On-Site Equipment Source 0.24 2.54 1.52 0.01 0.09 0.08
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 11.99 50.76 31.68 0.28 15.30 4.76 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Area Source 9.02 7.20E04 0.08 0.00 2.80E04

2.80E04
Energy Source 0.19 1.73 1.45 0.01 0.13 0.13
Mobile Source (Passenger Cars) 1.21 1.25 16.16 0.05 6.56 1.76 Mobile Source (Trucks) 1.23 47.16 8.83 0.21 8.51 2.78
On-Site Equipment Source 0.24 2.54 1.52 0.01 0.09 0.08
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 11.90 52.68 28.05 0.28 15.29 0.00 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-7)
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
Response: The following analysis addresses the Project’s potential to expose sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project site to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction and long-term operation. The following analysis is based on the applicable significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD (as summarized in Tables 3-9 and 3-11 of Technical Appendix A1).

Impact Analysis for Construction Localized Emissions
As summarized in Table 5, Summary of Construction Localized Emissions, localized emissions of NOX, CO, and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) would not exceed applicable SCAQMD thresholds during peak Project construction activities. Accordingly, Project construction would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of criteria pollutants. Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact Analysis for Operational Localized Emissions
The Project’s operational localized emissions are presented in Table 6, Summary of Operational Localized Emissions. As shown, the Project’s peak operational emissions would not exceed the localized thresholds established by the SCAQMD. Accordingly, long-term operation of the Project would not result in the exposure of any sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact Analysis for CO “Hot Spots”
Localized areas where ambient CO concentrations exceed the CAAQS and/or NAAQS are termed CO “hot spots.” Emissions of CO are produced in greatest quantities from motor vehicle combustion and are usually concentrated at or near ground level because they do not readily disperse into the atmosphere, particularly under cool, stable (i.e., low or no wind) atmospheric conditions. Consequently, the highest CO concentrations are generally found within close proximity to congested intersection locations.

For purposes of providing a conservative, worst‐case impact analysis, the Project’s potential to cause or contribute to CO hotspots was evaluated by comparing study area intersections that would receive Project traffic (both intersection geometry and traffic volumes) with prior studies conducted by the SCAQMD in support of their AQMPs. In the 2003 AQMP, the SCAQMD evaluated CO concentrations at F.1.b
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 35 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 5: Summary of Construction Localized Emissions
On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation
Maximum Daily Emissions 60.79 21.85 13.83 6.75
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 36 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Grading
Maximum Daily Emissions 56.54 31.23 8.77 3.84
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 36 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Building Construction
Maximum Daily Emissions 18.75 17.67 1.03 0.96
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 36 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Paving
Maximum Daily Emissions 11.12 14.58 0.57 0.52
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 36 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Architectural Coating
Maximum Daily Emissions 1.88 2.42 0.11 0.11
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 36 10
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-9)
Table 6: Summary of Operational Localized Emissions
Operational Activity Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 6.69 4.48 0.97 0.44
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 297 2,082 9 3
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Table 3-11)
four (4) busy intersections in the City of Los Angeles that were determined to be the most congested intersections in the SCAB. Each of the evaluated intersections were primary thoroughfares, some of which were located near major freeway on/off ramps, and experienced traffic volumes of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day. The SCAQMD’s analysis at these busy intersections did not identify any CO hotspots. Based on an analysis of the intersections in the Project’s study area, Urban Crossroads determined that none of the intersections in the Project’s study area would be subject to the extreme traffic volumes and vehicle congestion of the intersections modeled by the SCAQMD in the 2003 AQMP (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, pp. 52-53). Therefore, Project-related vehicular emissions would not create a CO hot spot and would not substantially contribute to an existing or projected CO hot spot. Impacts would be less than significant.

Impact Analysis for Diesel Particulate Emissions
Diesel-fueled trucks would travel to/from the Project site during operation of the Project. Diesel trucks produce diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is known to be associated with health hazards, including cancer. To evaluate the Project’s potential to expose sensitive receptors within ¼-mile of the Project site and the Project’s primary truck travel routes to substantial amounts of DPM during long-term operation, a Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment was prepared for the proposed Project (Technical Appendix A2). Project-related DPM health risks are summarized below. Detailed air dispersion model outputs and risk calculations are presented in Appendices 2.1 and 2.2, respectively, of Technical Appendix A2.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 36 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
At the maximally exposed individual receptor (MEIR) – the existing residential home located approximately 152 feet north of the Project site – the maximum cancer risk attributable to the Project’s DPM emissions is calculated to be 4.48 in one million. The cancer risk attributable to the Project at the MEIR would not exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in one million. At the MEIR, the noncancer health risk index attributable to the Project would be 0.002, which would not exceed the SCAQMD non-cancer health risk index of 1.0 (Urban Crossroads, 2020b, p. 1). Accordingly, long-term operations at the Project site would not directly cause or contribute in a cumulatively-considerable manner to the exposure of residential receptors to substantial DPM emissions. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact.

At the maximally exposed individual worker (MEIW) – the office building located approximately 744 feet west of the Project site – the maximum cancer risk attributable to the Project’s DPM emissions is calculated to be 0.18 in one million. The cancer risk attributable to the Project at the MEIW would not exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in one million. At the MEIW, the non-cancer health risk index attributable to the proposed Project would be 0.0006, which would not exceed the SCAQMD noncancer health risk index of 1.0 (Urban Crossroads, 2020b, p. 1). Therefore, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact.

There are no schools located within a ¼ mile of the Project site, which is the distance from the Project site with the highest concentration of Project-related DPM emissions. Proximity to sources of toxics is critical to determining the impact. Based on California Air Resources Board and SCAQMD emissions and modeling analyses, particulate matter pollutant concentrations drop by 70 percent at approximately 500 feet from the emissions source and by 80 percent at approximately 1,000 feet from the emissions source (Urban Crossroads, 2020b, p. 2). Because there are no schools located within at least 1,320 feet of the Project site, implementation of the Project would not expose any school child receptors to substantial concentrations of diesel particulate matter emissions. Project-related truck traffic would travel off-site along public streets (traffic to/from I-215 is expected to travel along Alessandro Boulevard and Cactus Avenue). There are no schools located within ¼ mile of Alessandro Boulevard and Cactus Avenue between the Project site and I-215; therefore, the Project-related traffic traveling to/from I-215 would not expose school children receptors to substantial DPM concentrations. Based on the foregoing analysis, implementation of the Project would not expose school child receptors to substantial DPM concentrations. This impact is less than significant.
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
Response: The Project could produce odors during proposed construction activities resulting from construction equipment exhaust, application of asphalt, and/or the application of architectural coatings; however, standard construction practices would minimize the odor emissions and their associated impacts. Furthermore, any odors emitted during construction would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature, and would cease upon the completion of the respective phase of construction. In addition, construction activities on the Project site would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which prohibits the discharge of odorous emissions that would create a public nuisance (Urban Crossroads, 2020a, pp. 58-59). Accordingly, the proposed Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people during construction, and short-term impacts would be less than significant.

During long-term operation, the Project would include a warehouse land use, which is not typically associated with objectionable odors. The temporary storage of refuse associated with the proposed Project’s long-term operational use could be a potential source of odor; however, Project-generated refuse is required to be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations, thereby precluding any significant odor impact. Furthermore, the proposed Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which prohibits the discharge of odorous emissions that would create a public nuisance, during long-term operation (Urban Crossroads, 2020b, pp. 58-59) As such, long-term operation of the proposed Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people and impacts would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 37 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Sources:

1. Urban Crossroads, 2020a, Air Quality Impact Analysis, Technical Appendix A1

2. Urban Crossroads, 2020b, Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment, Technical Appendix A2 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Response: A Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Compliance Analysis was prepared for the Project by MIG. The MSHCP compliance analysis addresses potential impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species due to implementation of the Project and is included as Technical Appendix B1 to this IS/MND (MIG, 2020a). Focused burrowing owl and least Bell’s vireo survey reports address the potential for the respective species to occur on the Project site and are included as Technical Appendices B4 and B5 (MIG, 2020b; MIG, 2020c). The analysis presented below is based on the findings of the abovementioned reports.

Special-Status Plant Species
All special-status plant species that have potential to occur within the Project survey area are adequately covered by the Western Riverside County MSHCP (MIG, 2020a, p. 15). Furthermore, the Project survey area is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Special Survey Area (NEPSSA) or Criteria Area Plant Special Survey Area (CAPSSA) and, thus, is not considered to be in an area with a high likelihood of supporting populations of sensitive native plant species (MIG, 2020a, p. 15). Implementation of the Project would not result in substantial adverse impacts to special-status plants and mitigation is not required.

Special-Status Wildlife Species
The Project site supports suitable habitat for the burrowing owl and least Bell’s vireo; however, neither species was observed on the Project site during focused species surveys (MIG, 2020a, pp. 15-16; MIG 2020b, p. 4; MIG 2020c, p. 5). All other special-status wildlife species that have the potential to occur within the Project survey area are adequately covered by the Western Riverside County MSHCP (MIG, 2020a, pp. 15-16). The Project’s consistency with the MSHCP is addressed under Response IV(f).

Notwithstanding the information presented above, the burrowing owl is a nomadic species and there is the potential that the species could migrate onto the Project site prior to construction. If burrowing owls are present on the Project site during grading activities, the Project’s impact to the species would be significant and mitigation would be required, as discussed below.

Additionally, implementation of Project would result in removal of vegetation across the Project site that has the potential to support nesting and/or migratory birds that are granted special status by federal and State regulations. The Project’s potential to impact nesting birds and migratory birds is a significant direct impact for which mitigation is required, as discussed below.

MM BR-1 and MM BR-2 would reduce potential impacts to the burrowing owl and nesting/migratory birds to less-than-significant levels by ensuring that pre-construction surveys are conducted to determine the presence or absence on the Project site of the burrowing owl and/or protected nesting bird species prior to the commencement of construction activities. If the burrowing owl or protected nesting bird species are present, the mitigation measures provide performance criteria that require avoidance and/or relocation of the species in accordance with accepted protocols.

Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species with the implementation of mitigation.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 38 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mitigation
MM BR-1 Within 30 days prior to grading, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey of suitable habitat on site and make a determination regarding the presence or absence of the burrowing owl. The determination shall be documented in a report and shall be submitted, reviewed, and accepted by the City of Moreno Valley prior to the issuance of a grading permit and subject to the following provisions:
a) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies no burrowing owls on the property a grading permit may be issued without restriction. b) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies the presence of at least one individual but less than three (3) mating pairs of burrowing owl, then prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities on the property, the qualified biologist shall passively or actively relocate any burrowing owls. Passive relocation, including the required use of one-way doors to exclude owls from the site and the collapsing of burrows, will occur if the biologist determines that the proximity and availability of alternate habitat is suitable for successful passive relocation. Passive relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol and shall only occur between September 15 and February 1. If proximate alternate habitat is not present as determined by the biologist, active relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol. The biologist shall confirm in writing that the species has fledged the site or been relocated prior to the issuance of a grading permit. c) In the event that the pre-construction survey identifies the presence of three (3) or more mating pairs of burrowing owl, the requirements of MSCHP Species-Specific Conservation Objectives 5 for the burrowing owl shall be followed. Objective 5 states that if the site (including adjacent areas) supports three (3) or more pairs of burrowing owls and supports greater than 35 acres of suitable habitat, at least 90 percent of the area with long-term conservation value and burrowing owl pairs will be conserved onsite until it is demonstrated that Objectives 1-4 have been met. A grading permit shall be issued, either:
i) Upon approval and implementation of a property-specific Determination of Biologically Superior Preservation (DBESP) report for the burrowing owl by the CDFW; or
ii) A determination by the biologist that the site is part of an area supporting less than 35 acres of suitable Habitat, and upon passive or active relocation of the species following accepted CDFW protocols. Passive relocation, including the required use of one-way doors to exclude owls from the site and the collapsing of burrows, will occur if the biologist determines that the proximity and availability of alternate habitat is suitable for successful passive relocation. Passive relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol and shall only occur between September 15 and February 1. If proximate alternate habitat is not present as determined by the biologist, active relocation shall follow CDFW relocation protocol. The biologist shall confirm in writing that the species has fledged the site or been relocated prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

MM BR-2 All vegetation clearing and ground disturbance shall be prohibited during the bird nesting season (February 1 through September 15), unless a nesting bird survey is completed in accordance with the following requirements:
a) A bird nesting survey of the Project Site, including suitable habitat within a 100-foot radius, shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within five (5) days prior to initiating F.1.b
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 39 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
vegetation clearing or ground disturbance at the respective property. A copy of the nesting bird survey results report shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley. b) If the survey does not identify the presence of any active nests, then construction activities can proceed without restriction.
c) If the survey identifies the presence of active nests, then the qualified biologist shall provide the City with a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and a speciesappropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from substantial adverse direct and/or indirect impacts. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be subject to review and approval by the City but shall be no less than a 100-foot radius around the nest for non-raptor species and no more than a 500-foot radius around the nest for raptor species and any endangered, threatened, or candidate species.
i) The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., bird protection zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected species, until after the nest becomes inactive (or the nest has failed), the young have fledged, the young are no longer being fed by the parents, the young have left the area, or the young will no longer be impacted by the activities.
ii) In the event that a nest is abandoned despite efforts to minimize disturbance and, if the nestlings are still alive, the Project Applicant/Developer shall contact the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and, subject to CDFW approval, fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release of captive reared young) of the nestling(s).
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Response: A jurisdictional delineation report was prepared for the Project. The jurisdictional delineation identifies potential jurisdictional waters and wetlands located on and abutting the Project site and is included as Technical Appendix B2 to this IS/MND (MIG, 2021a). Additionally, a DBESP report was prepared to address potential MSHCP riparian/riverine areas located on and abutting the Project site.

The DBESP report is included as Technical Appendix B3 (MIG, 2021b).

The Project would permanently impact approximately 0.61-acre of riparian and riverine habitats subject to CDFW jurisdiction, which are located within the black willow riparian woodland habitat (0.39-acre), disturbed wetland-cattail (0.02-are), and wetland meadow along two ephemeral drainage courses (Drainages A and B, totaling 0.81-acre) on the Project site (MIG, 2021a, pp. 25-26). Accordingly, the Project would have a direct significant impact on riparian/riverine habitat and sensitive natural community for which mitigation is required.

MM BR-3 would reduce potential impacts to less-than-significant impacts by ensuring that the Project Applicant obtains all applicable permits for impacts to jurisdictional features and fully compensates for the permanent impacts to riparian/riverine habitat through the purchase of habitat mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. With implementation of MM BR-3, the proposed Project would result in lessthan-significant impacts to riparian/riverine habitats and sensitive natural communities (MIG, 2021b, pp. 10-11).

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 40 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
MM BR-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall obtain all applicable permits for impacts to jurisdictional features, which may include a 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW and a 401 Certification issued by the RWQCB pursuant to the California Water Code Section 13260. In addition, the Project Applicant shall purchase a minimum of 0.81-acre of re-establishment credits (a 1:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio for impacts to wetland meadow habitat) and 0.82-acre of rehabilitation credits (a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio for impacts to black willow riparian woodland and disturbed wetland-cattail habitats). Habitat mitigation credits can be purchased either at an approved Habitat Mitigation Bank (e.g., Riverpark Mitigation Bank) or via an In-Lieu Fee Program (e.g., Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District and the Southwest Resource Management Association Santa Ana River Watershed In-Lieu Fee Program). Approval to purchase the mitigation credits must be granted in advance by the resource agencies. The Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Moreno Valley that the applicable permits have been obtained and that the required habitat mitigation credits have been purchased prior to issuance of grading permits.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Response: Implementation of the Project would permanently impact 0.02-acre of Wetland Waters of the State, associated with the on-site disturbed wetland-cattail habitat) (MIG, 2021a, pp. 25, 27). No other federal of State-protected wetland waters, including vernal pools, are present on the Project site (MIG, 2021a, p. 22). Accordingly, the Project would have a direct significant impact on State-protected wetlands for which mitigation is required.

MM BR-3 would reduce Project impacts to State-protected wetlands to a less-than-significant level by ensuring that the Project Applicant obtains all applicable permits for impacts to jurisdictional features and fully compensates for the permanent impacts to State wetlands through the purchase of habitat mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. With implementation of MM BR-3, the proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts to State-protected wetlands (MIG, 2021b, pp. 10-11). d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with an established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
Response: Wildlife movement corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbances. The Project site was evaluated for its function as a wildlife corridor that species would use to move between wildlife habitat zones as part of the MSHCP Compliance Analysis. Generally, mountain canyons and/or riparian corridors are used by wildlife as corridors; the Project site does not contain either of these features.

Furthermore, the Project site is substantially surrounded by human activity in the form of industrial land uses and roadways. Lastly, the Project site is not identified for conservation or designated as a wildlife movement corridor as part of the MSHCP and the Project would be consistent with the MSHCP and, thus, would not interfere with or affect any MSHCP-designated wildlife movement corridor. (MIG, 2020a, p. 17) Therefore, no impact to a wildlife corridor would occur from implementation of the Project.

Wildlife nurseries are sites where wildlife concentrate for hatching and/or raising young, such as rookeries, spawning areas, and bat colonies. Although no nesting birds or remnant nests were observed on the Project site by MIG, implementation of the Project could potentially result in significant impacts to biological resources (i.e., avian species and their nests) that are protected by the MBTA and CFGC if active nests are present within or adjacent to the site during construction. Implementation of MM BR-2 would reduce potential impacts to nesting birds to less-than-significant levels by ensuring that preconstruction surveys are conducted to determine the presence or absence of nesting birds on or adjacent to the Project site prior to the commencement of construction activities. If active nests are discovered, F.1.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 41 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
this mitigation measure establishes performance criteria that requires avoidance of the nests until it can be determined the nest is no longer active or that the juveniles from the occupied nests are capable of surviving independently of the nest.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Response: Implementation of the Project would result in the removal of trees on the Project site. The removal of trees is regulated by City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 9.17.030, which requires development projects to conduct a tree survey prior to construction and, if any mature significant trees are to be removed, to replace each removed tree at defined ratios (as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 9.17.030). Prior to removal of any mature significant trees from the Project survey area, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with the provisions of Chapter 9.17.030 of the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code. Mandatory compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Code would ensure the Project would not conflict with the City of Moreno Valley’s ordinance regulating tree removal.

In addition, the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code contains provisions for the protection of the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat (refer to Title 8, Chapter 8.60 of the Municipal Code). The Project site is not located within an identified reserve area for the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat and the species was not observed during biological surveys of the Project site (MIG, 2020a, p. 16). Accordingly, the Project is exempt from the focused survey requirements for the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat established by the City’s Municipal Code. The Project Applicant is required by the Municipal Code to contribute a local development impact and mitigation fee, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in implementing the habitat conservation plan for the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat. With mandatory compliance with standard regulatory requirements (i.e., development impact and mitigation fee payment), the proposed Project would not conflict with any City policies or ordinances related to the protection of the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat. (The Project’s consistency with applicable provisions of the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat HCP are addressed in Response IV(f).)
The City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code also contains provisions for the collection of mitigation fees to further the implementation of the Western Riverside County MSHCP (refer to Title 3, Chapter 3.48 of the Municipal Code). The Project Applicant is required by the Municipal Code to contribute a local mitigation fee, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in implementing the Western Riverside County MSHCP reserve system (including the acquisition, management, and long-term maintenance of sensitive habitat areas). With mandatory compliance with standard regulatory requirements (i.e., mitigation fee payment), the proposed Project would not conflict with any City policies or ordinances related to the mitigation fee program associated with Western Riverside County MSHCP. (The Project’s consistency with applicable provisions of the MSHCP are addressed in Response IV(f).) The City of Moreno Valley does not have any additional policies or ordinances in place to protect biological resources that are applicable to the Project. Mandatory compliance with the above referenced Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapters would ensure that implementation of the Project would result in a less than significant impact associated with local policies and ordinances. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or another approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Response: The Project site is subject to the provisions of the Western Riverside County MSHCP; however, the Project site is not located in a criteria cell or area plan subunit. The following analysis evaluates the Project’s compliance with the Western Riverside County MSHCP requirements pursuant to the following sections of the MSHCP that are applicable to the Project site: Section 6.1.2, Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine areas and Vernal Pools; Section 6.1.3, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species; Section 6.1.4, Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildland Interface; and Section 6.3.2, Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 42 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Section 6.1.2 Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Habitat and Vernal Pools The Project survey area does not contain any MSHCP vernal pools or seasonal pools. The Project site does contain 0.59-acre of MSHCP riparian/riverine habitat, all of which would be removed by the Project (MIG, 2021b, p. 1). As required by the MSHCP, a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report is required in all instances where MSHCP riparian/riverine areas would be impacted by a development project. The goal of the DBESP report is to demonstrate that the development project provides mitigation that is biologically equivalent or superior to the existing conditions on a development site if left undisturbed. The Project’s DBESP report is provided as Technical Appendix B3.

According to the Project’s DBESP report, the purchase of habitat re-establishment and rehabilitation mitigation credits would be considered superior mitigation as compared to the preservation of the 0.59- acre of on-site MSHCP riparian/riverine habitat because the mitigation bank where the habitat credits would be purchased provide high quality habitat areas with habitat functions that are superior to the existing conditions at the Project site (MIG, 2021b, pp. 10-11). As such, with implementation of MM BR3, the Project’s significant impacts to MSHCP riverine and riparian areas would be reduced to less than significant and the Project would not conflict with Section 6.1.2 of the Western Riverside County MSHCP.

Section 6.1.3 Protection of Narrow Endemic Plants
The Project site is not located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA); therefore, the NEPSSA requirements are not applicable to the Project and the Project is consistent with the Western Riverside County MSHCP narrow endemic plant species policies (MIG, 2020a, pp. 17-18).

Section 6.1.4 Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines
The Project site is not located within or adjacent to a Western Riverside County MSHCP Conservation Area; therefore, the Project site is not required to address Section 6.1.4 of the Western Riverside County MSHCP (MIG, 2020a, pp. 18-19).

Section 6.3.2 Additional Surveys and Procedures
The Project site is not located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA); therefore, the CAPSSA requirements are not applicable to the Project.

Additionally, the Project site is not located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP additional survey areas for amphibians, survey areas for mammals, or any special linkage areas; however, the Project site is located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP burrowing owl survey area (MIG, 2020a, pp. 17- 18).

No evidence of use of the site by burrowing mammals was present and no burrows suitable for use by the owl was observed. The species is considered absent from the Project site and potential occurrence is low; however, a preconstruction burrowing owl survey in accordance with the Western Riverside County MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Requirements is required to ensure compliance with the Plan’s provisions for protecting the burrowing owl (see MM BR-1). With implementation of MM BR-1, implementation of the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact to the burrowing owl. (MIG, 2020a, p. 18)
Additionally, the Project site is located within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Area, which is administered by the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. The Project Applicant would be required to pay the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat, which is established at $500 per acre (MIG, 2020a, pp. 19-20; Riverside County, 1996, p. 53). Payment of the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat HCP fee is required – as noted in the analysis under Response IV(e) – and would ensure the Project is consistent with the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat HCP and the Western Riverside County MSHCP.

Sources:

1. MIG, 2020a, MSHCP General Biological Resources Assessment & Compliance Analysis, Technical Appendix B1

2. MIG, 2021a, Jurisdictional Delineation Report and Impact Analysis, Technical Appendix B2 F.1.b
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 43 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. MIG, 2021b, MSHCP Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation, Technical Appendix B3

4. MIG, 2020b, Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report, Technical Appendix B4

5. MIG, 2020c, Least Bell’s Vireo Focused Survey Report, Technical Appendix B5

6. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.9 – Biological Resources
- Figure 5.9-2 – Planning Area Vegetation Community

7. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 3.48 – Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Program

8. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.60 – Threatened and Endangered Species

9. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 14.40.040 – Public Tree Care

10. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.17.030 – Landscape Ordinance

11. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), http://www.wrc-rca.org/about-rca/multiple-species-habitat-conservation-plan/

12. Riverside County Information Technology – Map My County, https://gis.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC_Public

13. Regional Conservation Agency – MSHCP Information Map, http://wrcrca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a73e69d2a64d41c29ebd3ac d67467abd

14. Riverside County Ordinance No. 633.10, https://www.rivcocob.org/ords/600/663.10.pdf V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§ 15064.5?
Response: A cultural resources survey conducted for the Project site by Brian F. Smith and Associates (BFSA), which included a comprehensive site survey and archival records search, identified no historic resources on the Project site (BFSA, 2020a, p. 1.0-1). Additionally, the Project site is not identified as containing a historic resource by the City of Moreno Valley General Plan FEIR, Exhibit 5.10-1, Locations of Listed Historic Resource Inventory Structures (Moreno Valley, 2006b). Accordingly, the Project has no potential to impact a historical resource as defined by California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to § 15064.5?
Response: According to the cultural resources survey conducted by BFSA, no prehistoric archaeological resources were observed on the Project site during a comprehensive field survey and no prehistoric archaeological resources are known to exist within a one-mile radius of the Project site based on an archival records search conducted with the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside (BFSA, 2020a, pp. 5.0-1 to 5.0-5). Based on the findings of the field survey and archival research and due to historic disturbances on the Project site, BFSA concluded the Project site had a low likelihood for containing prehistoric archaeological resources (BFSA, 2020a, pp. 1.0-1 and 6.0- 1). Based on the foregoing, the Project would result in less-than-significant impact to prehistoric archaeological resources defined by California Code of Regulations Section 15064.5. c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formally dedicated
cemeteries?
Response: The Project site does not contain a cemetery, and no known formal cemeteries are located within the immediate site vicinity (Moreno Valley, 2006b, p. 1.0-1). Nevertheless, the remote potential exists that human remains may be unearthed during grading and excavation activities associated with Project construction. If human remains are unearthed during Project construction, the construction contractor would be required by law to comply with California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 “Disturbance of Human Remains.” According to Subsections 7050.5(b) and (c), if human remains are discovered, the County Coroner must be contacted and if the Coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, the Coroner is required to contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission F.1.b
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 44 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(NAHC). Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, whenever the NAHC receives notification of a discovery of Native American human remains from a county coroner, the NAHC is required to immediately notify those persons it believes to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants may, with the permission of the owner of the land, or his or her authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American human remains and may recommend to the owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treatment or disposition, with appropriate dignity, of the human remains and any associated grave goods. The descendants shall complete their inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. According to Public Resources Code Section 5097.94(k), the NAHC is authorized to mediate disputes arising between landowners and known descendants relating to the treatment and disposition of Native American human burials, skeletal remains, and items associated with Native American burials.

With mandatory compliance to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, any potential impacts to human remains, including human remains of Native American descent, would be reduced to less than significant and mitigation is not required.

Sources:

1. California Health Code Section 7050.5 – Dead Bodies

2. Public Resources Code Section 5097.94(k) – Powers and Duties

3. Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 – Native American Historical, Cultural, and Sacred Sites

4. Moreno Valley General Plan, approved July 11, 2006

5. BFSA, 2020a, Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project, Technical Appendix C
VI. ENERGY – Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
Response: The analysis below is based on the Energy Analysis (included as Technical Appendix D to this IS/MND) prepared for the proposed Project by Urban Crossroads and demonstrates that implementation of the Project would not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation.

Energy Use During Construction
The Project’s construction process would consume electricity and fuel. Project-related construction activities would represent a “single‐event” demand and would not require on‐going or permanent commitment of energy resources. Project construction is estimated to consume approximately 85,609 kWh of electricity, approximately 36,736 gallons of diesel fuel from operation of construction equipment, 15,941 gallons of diesel fuel from construction vendor trips, and 26,278 gallons of fuel from construction worker trips (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 36). The amount of energy and fuel use anticipated by the Project’s construction activities are typical for the type of scale of construction proposed by the Project and there are no aspects of the Project’s proposed construction process that are unusual or energyintensive. Furthermore, construction equipment would be required to conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies. For example, CCR Title 13, Motor Vehicles, Section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. As supported by the preceding discussion, the Project’s construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 31) Impacts during Project construction would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 45 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Energy Use Project Operations
Energy that would be consumed by Project-related traffic is a function of total vehicle miles traveled and the estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project would result in 5,292,177 annual vehicle miles traveled and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 405,743 gallons of fuel (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 34). The number of daily trips and miles traveled by Project traffic are consistent with other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration in the Inland Empire. That is, the Project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and/or vehicle miles traveled, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 37). Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and State regulatory actions, and related transition of passenger vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, bio fuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per mile traveled. The location of the Project site proximate to regional and local arterial roadways (e.g., I-215 and SR-60) is expected to minimize the Project vehicle miles traveled within the region. Based on the foregoing, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 38).

Building operations and site maintenance activities associated with the Project would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by Southern California Gas Company; electricity would be supplied to the Project by Moreno Valley Utility (MVU).

Energy demands resulting from Project operations are estimated at 6,438,204 kilo-British thermal units (kBTU) per year of natural gas and 5,261,115 Kilowatt-hour (kWh) per year of electricity (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 35). The Project provides conventional industrial buildings uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. Uses proposed by the Project are not inherently energy intensive, and the Project energy demands in total would be comparable to, or less than, other industrial projects of similar scale and configuration (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, pp. 37-38). Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with Title 24 standards, which would ensure that the Project’s energy demand would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary (ibid.).

Based on the foregoing analysis, Project operations would result in a less-than-significant impact to energy resources.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Response: The following section analyzes the Project’s consistency with the applicable federal and State regulations. As supported by the proceeding analysis, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency and a less-than-significant impact would occur.

Consistency with Federal Energy Regulations
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) Transportation and access to the Project site is provided primarily by the local and regional roadway systems, which includes I-215, SR-60, and Alessandro Boulevard. Implementation of the Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for intermodal facilities on or through the Project site (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 39).

The Transportation Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21)
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the interstate freeway system (i.e., I-215). The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning processes emphasized under TEA‐21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA‐21 (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 39).

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 46 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Consistency with State Energy Regulations
Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
Electricity would be provided to the Project by MVU and natural gas would be provided by SoCalGas.

The MVU and SoCal Gas energy supplies comply with and build off existing State programs and policies.

As such, the Project is consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation the goals presented in the IEPR (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 39).

State of California Energy Plan
The Project site is located along Alessandro Boulevard, east of Frederick Street, with proximate access to Interstate 215. The location of the Project site facilitates access, acts to reduce VMT, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use compatibilities through the introduction of industrial uses on a site surrounded by industrial and commercial uses. Therefore, the Project supports urban design and planning processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of the State of California Energy Plan (Urban Crossroads, 2020c, p. 39).

California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards The Project would design building shells and building components, such as windows; roof systems:
electrical and lighting systems: and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems to meet 2019 Title 24 Standards. The Project also is required by State law to be designed, constructed, and operated to meet or exceed Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards. On this basis, the Project is determined to be consistent with, and would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct implementation of Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards
Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493)
AB 1493 is applicable to the Project because model year 2009-2016 passenger cars and light duty truck vehicles traveling to and from the Project site are required by law to comply with the legislation’s fuel efficiency requirements. On this basis, the Project is determined to be consistent, with, and would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct implementation of AB 1493.

Advanced Clean Cars Program
The Advanced Clean Cars Program is applicable to the Project because model year 2017-2025 passenger car vehicles traveling to and from the Project site are required by law to comply with the legislation’s fuel efficiency requirements. On this basis, the Project is determined to be consistent, with, and would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct implementation of California’s Advanced Clean Cars Program.

California Renewable Portfolio Standards (SB 1078)
Energy directly or indirectly supplied to the Project site by electric corporations is required by law to comply with SB 1078.

Sources:

1. Urban Crossroads, 2020c, Compass Danbe Centerpointe Energy Analysis, Technical Appendix D
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Document
s/SP_042.pdf
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 47 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: There are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones affecting the Project site (NorCal Engineering, 2020, p. 4). The nearest Earthquake Fault Zone is the San Jacinto Fault, which occurs approximately 3.7 miles southeast of the Project site (Google Earth Pro, 2020; Moreno Valley, 2006a, Figure 6-3). Because there are no known faults located on the Project site, there is no potential for the Project to expose people or structures to adverse effects related to ground rupture. No impact would occur.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Response: The Project site is located in a seismically active area of southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. This risk is not considered substantially different than that of other similar properties in the southern California area. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to construct the proposed warehouse buildings in accordance with the California Building Standards Code (CBSC), also known as California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24 (Part 2), and the City of Moreno Valley Building Code, which is based on the CBSC with local amendments. The CBSC and City of Moreno Valley Building Code (Moreno Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 8.20) provide standards that must be met to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures, and have been specifically tailored for California earthquake conditions. In addition, the CBSC (Chapter 18) and the City of Moreno Valley Building Code (Chapter 8.21) require development projects to prepare geologic engineering reports to identify site-specific geologic and seismic conditions and implement the site-specific recommendations contained therein to preclude adverse effects involving unstable soils and strong seismic ground-shaking, including, but not limited to, recommendations related to ground stabilization, selection of appropriate foundation type and depths, selection of appropriate structural systems. The Project Applicant has commissioned such a report titled, Geotechnical Investigation – Proposed Warehouse Building Development (NorCal Engineering, 2020), which is included as Technical Appendix E to this IS/MND, and the City would condition the Project to comply with the site-specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the report. With mandatory compliance with these standards and site-specific design and construction measures set forth in the Project’s geotechnical report, potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. As such, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including loss, injury, or death, involving seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less-than-significant.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Response: According to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.6-2, Seismic Hazards, the Project site is not located in an area with the potential for liquefaction. The geotechnical investigation prepared for the Project site concludes that based on observed subsurface conditions, the potential for liquefaction at the Project site is low due to the characteristics of on-site soils and the depth of the groundwater table beneath the site (greater than 50 feet below the surface) (NorCal Engineering, 2020, pp. 5-6). Regardless, the City of Moreno Valley will require that the property be developed in accordance with the latest applicable seismic safety guidelines, including the standard requirements of the CBSC and the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code Building Code, to minimize potential liquefaction hazards. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not directly or indirectly expose people or structures to substantial hazards associated with seismic-related ground failure and/or liquefaction hazards. Impacts would be less than significant. iv) Landslides?
Response: The Project site is generally flat and contains no substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. There are no substantial natural or man-made slopes in the Project site vicinity, either. Accordingly, development on the subject property would not be exposed to landslide risks, and the Project would not pose a landslide risk to surrounding properties; a less-than-significant impact would occur.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Response: The analysis below summarizes the likelihood of the Project to result in substantial soil erosion during temporary construction activities and/or long-term operation.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 48 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Construction-Related Impacts
Construction of the Project would involve grading, paving, utility installation, building construction, and landscaping installation, which has the potential to temporarily expose on-site soils that would be subject to erosion during rainfall events or high winds. Pursuant to State Water Resources Control Board requirements, the Project Applicant is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities, including proposed grading. The NPDES permit is required for all projects that include construction activities, such as clearing, grading, and/or excavation that disturb at least one (1) acre of total land area. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the Santa Ana RWQCB’s Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program. Compliance with the NPDES permit and the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program involves the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP for construction-related activities. The SWPPP will specify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be required to be implemented during construction activities to ensure that waterborne pollution – including erosion/sedimentation – is prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to surface runoff being discharged from the subject property. Examples of BMPs that may be utilized during construction include, but are not limited to, sandbag barriers, geotextiles, storm drain inlet protection, sediment traps, rip rap soil stabilizers, and hydro-seeding. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, which would reduce the amount of particulate matter in the air and minimize the potential for wind erosion (SCAQMD, 2005). With mandatory compliance to the requirements noted in the Project’s SWPPP, as well as applicable regulatory requirements, the potential for water and/or wind erosion impacts during Project construction would be less than significant and mitigation is not required.

Long-Term Operational Activities
Following construction, wind and water erosion on the Project site would be minimized, because the areas disturbed during construction would be landscaped or covered with impervious surfaces and drainage would be controlled through a storm drain system. Implementation of the Project would result in less long-term erosion and loss of topsoil than occurs under the site’s existing conditions.

The City’s MS4 NPDES Permit requires the Project Applicant to prepare and submit to the City for approval a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (refer to Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section

8.21.170). The WQMP is required to identify an effective combination of erosion control and sediment control measures (i.e., BMPs) to reduce or eliminate sediment discharge to surface water from storm water and non-storm water discharges. The WQMP also is required to establish a post-construction implementation and maintenance plan to ensure on-going, long-term erosion protection. Compliance with the WQMP will be required as a condition of approval for the Project, as would the long-term maintenance of erosion and sediment control features. The preliminary WQMP for the Project prepared by Thatcher Engineering and Associates, Inc. (Thatcher) (attached hereto as Technical Appendix I1) incorporates design features would be effective at removing silt and sediment from storm water runoff.

Because the Project would be required to utilize erosion and sediment control measures to preclude substantial, long-term soil erosion and loss of topsoil, the Project would result in less-than-significant impacts related to soil erosion.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in onor off­site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Response: The Project’s geotechnical report (Technical Appendix E) indicates that the settlement potential would be attenuated through the proposed removal of near surface soils down to competent materials and replacement with properly compacted fill, which is included as a recommendation in the Project’s geotechnical report. Additionally, only minor ground subsidence (±0.2 feet) is expected to occur in the soils below the zone of removal, due to earthwork operations (NorCal Engineering, 2020, p. 9).

Through standard conditions of approval in accordance with Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section

8.21.050, the proposed Project would be required by the City to incorporate the recommendations contained within the Project geotechnical report into the grading plan for the Project (Moreno Valley, n.d.). As such, implementation of the Project would result in less-than-significant impacts associated with soil shrinkage/subsidence and collapse.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 49 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
As discussed in Responses VII (a), (iii) and (iv), development of the property as proposed by the Project would result in a less than significant impact involving ground failure, including liquefaction and landslide, and a less-than-significant impact involving landslides. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
Response: According to USDA’s Web Soil Survey, the Project site is underlain with Monserate sandy loam 0 to 5 percent slopes, and expansion potential is “very low” to “medium” (USDA, n.d.; NorCal Engineering, 2020, Table II). The expansive characteristics of on-site soils would be attenuated by implementation of the foundation and floor slab design recommendations included in the Project’s geotechnical report, which the City will require as a condition of approval pursuant to Section 9.08.080 of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code (NorCal Engineering, 2020, pp. 7-14). According to the above, implementation of the Project would result in less-than-significant impacts associated with expansive soils and would not create substantial risks to life or property. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste water?
Response: The Project does not propose the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems. Accordingly, no impact would occur.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Response: The Project site does not contain any known unique geologic features (BFSA, 2020b, p. 6).

However, the Project site is underlain by lower Pleistocene (approximately 1.8 million to 200,000 years old), very old, sandy alluvial fan deposits that have a high paleontological sensitivity for fossils of large, terrestrial Ice Age vertebrates (BFSA, 2020b, p. 6). In the event that Project grading and excavation activities encroach into previously undisturbed Pleistocene-age alluvial deposits, the Project could result in impacts to important paleontological resources that may exist below the ground surface if they are unearthed and not properly protected. Therefore, the Project’s potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource buried beneath the ground surface is determined to be a significant impact and mitigation is required.

Implementation of MM GEO-1 through MM GEO-4 would ensure the proper identification and subsequent treatment of any paleontological resources that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, with implementation of MM GEO-1 through MM GEO-4, the Project’s potential impacts related to paleontological resources would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation
MM GEO-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Moreno Valley that a qualified paleontologist has been retained by the Project Applicant to conduct monitoring of excavation activities and has the authority to halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected paleontological resources are unearthed.

MM GEO-2 The paleontological monitor shall conduct full-time monitoring during grading and excavation operations in undisturbed, very old alluvial fan sediments at depths exceeding five feet below the existing ground surface and shall be equipped to salvage fossils if they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The paleontological monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow of removal of abundant and large specimens in a timely manner. Monitoring may be F.1.b
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 50 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units are not present in the subsurface, or if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have a low potential to contain or yield fossil resources.

MM GEO-3 Recovered specimens shall be properly prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including screen washing sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates, if necessary. Identification and curation of specimens into a professional, accredited public museum repository with a commitment to archival conservation and permanent retrievable storage, such as the Western Science Museum in Hemet, California, is required for significant discoveries.

MM GEO-4 A final monitoring and mitigation report of findings and significance shall be prepared, including lists of all fossils recovered, if any, and necessary maps and graphics to accurately record the original location of the specimens. The report shall be submitted to the City of Moreno Valley prior to building final.

Sources:

1. NorCal Engineering, 2020, Geotechnical Investigation, Technical Appendix E

2. BFSA, 2020b, Paleontological Assessment, Technical Appendix H

3. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.6 – Geology and Soils
- Figure 5.6-2 – Seismic Hazards
• Section 5.10 – Cultural Resources
- Figure 5.10-3 – Paleontological Resource Sensitive Areas

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 8.20 – Moreno Valley Building Code

5. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.08.160 – Seismic Hazards

6. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 8.21.050 – Grading Permit Requirements

7. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.08.080 – Grading VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
Response: A Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads, 2020d) was prepared for the Project by Urban Crossroads to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would result from Projectrelated construction and operational activities. This report is included as Technical Appendix F to this IS/MND and its findings are incorporated into the analysis presented herein.

While estimated Project-related GHG emissions can be calculated, the direct impacts of such emissions on Global Climate Change (GCC) and global warming cannot be determined on the basis of available science because global climate change is a global phenomenon and not limited to a specific locale such as the Project site and its immediate vicinity. Furthermore, there is no evidence that would indicate that the emissions from a project the size of the proposed Project could directly or indirectly affect the global climate. Because global climate change is the result of GHG emissions, and GHGs are emitted by innumerable sources worldwide, the proposed Project would not result in a direct impact to global climate change; rather, Project-related impacts to global climate change only could be potentially significant on a cumulative basis. (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, p. 8) Therefore, the analysis below focuses on the Project’s potential to contribute to global climate change in a cumulatively-considerable way.

The City of Moreno Valley has not adopted a numerical threshold for determining the significance of GHG emissions; however, the City has discretion to select an appropriate significance criterion used by other agencies, based on substantial evidence (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, p. 39). Specifically, the City has selected to compare Project-related GHG emissions against the draft 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year threshold recommended by SCAQMD staff for industrial projects against where SCAQMD is the lead agency. The industrial threshold utilized by SCAQMD is a widely accepted threshold used by numerous lead agencies in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and was established based on the recommendations from California Air Pollution Control Officers Association F.1.b
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 51 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(CAPCOA) contained in a report titled “CEQA and Climate Change” (dated January 2008), which serves as a resource for public agencies as they establish agency procedures for reviewing GHG emissions from projects under CEQA. The CAPCOA report provides three recommendations for evaluating a development project’s GHG emissions. When establishing their significance threshold, SCAQMD selected the CAPCOA non-zero approach which establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90 percent of emissions from future development (Approach 2, Threshold 2.5). A 90 percent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified projects would be subject to evaluation under CEQA. Based on SCAQMD’s research of 1,297 major, industrial source point (i.e., stationary) emission sources in the SCAB, SCAQMD found that source point industrial facilities that generate at least 10,000 MTCO2e per year produce approximately 90 percent of the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in the SCAB per year. As such, SCAQMD established their significance criterion at 10,000 MTCO2e as that threshold would capture 90 percent of total emissions from future industrial development in accordance with CAPCOA recommendations. (CAPCOA, 2008, pp. 46-47) If Project-related GHG emissions do not exceed the 10,000 MTCO2e per year threshold, then Projectrelated GHG emissions would clearly have a less-than-significant impact. On the other hand, if Projectrelated GHG emissions exceed 10,000 MTCO2e per year, the Project would be considered a substantial source of GHG emissions.

The Project’s annual GHG emissions are summarized in Table 7, Total Annual Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The methodology used to calculate the Project’s GHG emissions is described in detail in Technical Appendix F.

Table 7: Total Annual Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Source
Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total
CO2e
Annual construction-related emissions
amortized over 30 years 26.37 0.00 0.00 26.46
Area Source 0.02 5.00E-05 0.00 0.02
Energy Source 2,019.87 0.08 0.02 2,027.91
Mobile Source (Passenger Cars) 758.61 0.02 0.00 759.02
Mobile Source (Trucks) 3,038.11 0.05 0.00 3,039.35
On-Site Equipment Source 101.58 0.03 0.00 102.41
Waste 75.66 4.47 0.00 187.44
Water Usage 409.48 3.00 0.07 506.56
Total CO2e (All Sources) 6,649.16
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, Table 3-6)
As shown in Table 7, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 6,649.16 MTCO2e annually, which is less than the significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, p. 48).

Because the Project’s total annual GHG emissions would not exceed 10,000 MTCO2e, the Project would not generate substantial GHG emissions – either directly or indirectly – that would have a significant impact on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emission of greenhouse gases?
Response: The Project would comply with a number of regulations, policies, plans, and policy goals that would reduce GHG emissions, including the Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), and Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), which are regulations applicable to the Project. For more information on these regulations as well as other state-wide plans, policies, and regulations associated with GHG emissions that are not applicable to the Project, refer to Technical Appendix F of this IS/MND.

On October 9, 2012, the Moreno Valley City Council approved an Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy and related GHG analysis. The Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy document identifies potential programs and policies to reduce overall City energy consumption and increase the use of renewable energy. The majority of the policies are directed at municipal operations of the City, F.1.b
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 52 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
but the document also contains recommended policies for the community at large (including private development projects). These recommended policies include but are not limited to: energy efficiency, water use reduction, trip reduction, solid waste diversion, and educational policies. The overall goal of the Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy is to ensure that the City is consistent with and would not otherwise conflict with the provisions of AB 32. As demonstrated by the analysis below, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of AB 32 and, therefore, would not obstruct implementation of the components of the City’s Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy that are applicable to the Project.

CARB identified measures in their 2017 Scoping Plan Update to identify the measures that would achieve the emissions reductions goals of SB 32. As explained in point-by-point detail in Section 3.8 of Technical Appendix F (refer to Table 3-7), the Project would not conflict with applicable measures of the 2017 Scoping Plan Update and would not preclude/obstruct implementation of the Scoping Plan Update (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, Table 3-8).

In April 2015, Governor Edmund Brown Jr. signed Executive Order B-30-15, which advocated for a statewide GHG-reduction target of 40 percent below year 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. In September 2016, Governor Brown signed the Senate Bill (SB) 32. SB 32 formally established a statewide goal to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below year 1990 levels by 2030. To date, no statutes or regulations have been adopted to translate the year 2050 GHG reduction goal into comparable, scientifically-based statewide emission reduction targets.

According to research conducted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and supported by the CARB, California, under its existing and proposed GHG reduction policies (i.e., CARB Scoping Plan), is on track to meet the years 2020 and 2030 reduction targets established by AB 32 and SB 32, respectively (Urban Crossroads, 2020d, p. 27). As described above, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the CARB Scoping Plan; therefore, the Project would not interfere with the State’s ability to achieve the year 2030 GHG-reduction target established by SB 32.

Rendering a significance determination for year 2050 GHG emissions relative to EO B-30-15 would be speculative because EO B-30-15 establishes a goal more than three decades into the future; no agency with GHG subject matter expertise has adopted regulations to achieve these statewide goals at the project-level; and, available analytical models cannot presently quantify all project-related emissions in those future years. Further, due to the technological shifts anticipated and the unknown parameters of the regulatory framework in 2050, available GHG models and the corresponding technical analyses are subject to limitations for purposes of quantitatively estimating the Project’s emissions in 2050.

As described above, the Project would not conflict with the State’s ability to achieve the State-wide GHG reduction mandates and would be consistent with applicable policies and plans related to GHG emissions reductions. Impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Urban Crossroads, 2020d, Greenhouse Gas Analysis, Technical Appendix F IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
Response: A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the Project site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) and is included as Technical Appendix G to this IS/MND. As part of the Phase I ESA efforts, Partner conducted a visual inspection of the Project site, researched regulatory hazardous materials databases, reviewed historical reference materials (including aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City of Moreno Valley directories), and interviewed people with historical links to the Project site; the findings of this research are incorporated into the analysis presented herein.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 53 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Existing Site Conditions Impacts
There were no underground or aboveground storage tanks, drain lines, sumps, ponds, pits, lagoons, stressed vegetation, wells, transformers, or mold found on the Project site (Partner, 2019, pp. 17-18).

Based on a review of historic regulatory agency hazardous materials databases, historic site aerial photographs, interviews with current property owners, and a reconnaissance of the Project site, Partner determined that the Project site does not contain any recognized environmental conditions (RECs), historic recognized environmental conditions, or other environmental issues (Partner, 2019, p. 21). A REC is defined as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment” (ibid.).

A HREC is defined as “past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the application regulatory authority” (ibid).

Based on the foregoing analysis, the Project would not create significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials from the Project site under existing conditions. A less-than-significant impact would occur.

Construction‐Related Impacts
Heavy equipment (e.g., dozers, excavators, tractors) would be operated on the subject property during construction of the Project. Heavy equipment is typically fueled and maintained by petroleum‐based substances such as diesel fuel, gasoline, oil, and hydraulic fluid, which is considered hazardous if improperly stored or handled. In addition, materials such as paints, adhesives, solvents, and other substances typically used in building construction would be located on the Project site during construction. Improper use, storage, or transportation of hazardous materials can result in accidental releases or spills, potentially posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment. This is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for improper handling, transportation, or spills associated with the proposed Project than would occur on any other similar construction site. Construction contractors would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding the transport, use, and storage of hazardous construction‐ related materials, including but not limited requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and Santa Ana RWQCB. With mandatory compliance with applicable hazardous materials regulations, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials during the construction phase. Impacts would be less than significant.

Long‐Term Operational Impacts
The future building occupant(s) for the Project site are not yet identified; however, the Project is designed to house warehouse distribution occupants and it is possible that hazardous materials could be used during the course of a future building user’s daily operations. State and federal Community-Right-toKnow laws allow the public access to information about the amounts and types of chemicals in use at local businesses. Laws also are in place that requires businesses to plan and prepare for possible chemical emergencies. Any business that occupies a building on the Project site and that handles hazardous materials (as defined in Section 25500 of California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95) will require a permit from the Moreno Valley County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division in order to register the business as a hazardous materials handler. Such businesses also are required to comply with California’s Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Law, which requires immediate reporting to the County of Riverside Fire Department and the State Office of Emergency Services regarding any release or threatened release of a hazardous material, regardless of the amount handled by the business. In addition, any business handling at any one time, greater than 500 pounds of solid, 55 gallons of liquid, or 200 cubic feet of gaseous hazardous material, is required, under Assembly Bill 2185 (AB 2185), to file a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP).

A HMBEP is a written set of procedures and information created to help minimize the effects and extent of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material. The intent of the HMBEP is to satisfy federal and State Community Right-To-Know laws and to provide detailed information for use by emergency responders.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 54 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If businesses that use or store hazardous materials occupy the Project, the business owners and operators would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations to ensure proper use, storage, use, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances (as described above). With mandatory regulatory compliance, the Project is not expected to pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

With mandatory regulatory compliance, potential hazardous materials impacts associated with long-term operation of the Project are determined to be less than significant and mitigation is not required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Response: Accidents involving hazardous materials that could pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be highly unlikely during the construction and long-term operation of the Project and are not reasonably foreseeable. As discussed above under Response IX(a), the transport, use, and handling of hazardous materials on the Project site during construction is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for upset and accidents than would occur on any other similar construction site. Upon buildout, the Project site would operate as a warehouse distribution center. Based on the operational characteristics of warehouse distribution centers, it is possible that hazardous materials could be used during the course of a future occupant’s daily operations; however, as discussed above under Response IX(a), the Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable local, State, and federal regulations related to the transport, handling, and usage of hazardous material. Accordingly, impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant during both construction and long-term operation of the Project and mitigation would not be required.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
Response: There are no schools located within 0.25-mile of the Project site (Google Earth Pro, 2020).

Thus, the Project would not have a significant effect in emitting hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. No impact would occur.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
Response: The Phase I ESA (Technical Appendix G to this IS/MND) prepared for the Project site included a search of regulatory databases, including the California EPA’s Regulated Site Portal, the Santa Ana RWQCB’s Geotracker database, and DTSC’s EnviroStor database (EDR). The Project site is identified on the EDR database as situated within the former Department of Defense (DOD) boundary of March Air Force Base; however, the Project site is not mapped within a national priority list (NPL) or area of concern associated with the Base (Partner, 2019, p. 13). Accordingly, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern to the Project site and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The Project site is not included on any other list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Impacts would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 55 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
Response: The Project site is located approximately 1.1 miles southwest of the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport (MARB/IPA). Pursuant to the March Air Reserve Base Compatible Use Zone Study commissioned by the United States Air Force and as depicted on Figure 6-5, Air Crash Hazards, of the Moreno Valley General Plan, the Project site is not located within a zone subject to hazards related to air crashes (Moreno Valley, 2006a). According to the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the western portion of the Project site is located in Compatibility Zone E and the eastern portion of the Project site is located within Compatibility Zone D (RCALUC, 2014, Map MA-1). Properties located in Zone D and E are subject to safety risks associated with aircraft operations, but the potential hazards are sufficiently minimal that land use restrictions are generally unnecessary (RCALUC, 2014, Table MA-1). Thus, the light industrial land uses proposed by the Project are permitted in Zone D and E by the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) and were determined by the ALUC to be consistent with the ALUCP during their January 14, 2021 public meeting. The industrial warehouse buildings proposed by the Project would be no greater than 50 feet tall and does not include an air travel component (e.g., runway, helipad); therefore, would not interfere with flight operations at the March Air Reserve Base. The Project would not result in safety hazards for people residing or working in the Project area. Impacts would be less than significant, and mitigation is not required.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Response: The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities under existing conditions nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route, so there is no potential for the Project to adversely affect an existing emergency response or evacuation plan. During construction and at Project buildout, the proposed Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles as required by the City. As part of the City’s discretionary review process, the City of Moreno Valley reviewed the Project to ensure that appropriate emergency ingress and egress would be available toand-from the proposed warehouse buildings for public safety, and determined that the Project would not substantially impede emergency response times in the local area. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan, and no impact would occur. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
Response: According to City of Moreno Valley General Plan FEIR Figure 5.5-2, Floodplains and High Fire Hazard Areas, the Project site is not located in an area of substantial or high fire risk (Moreno Valley, 2006b). Additionally, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire) identifies the Project site location as within a Non-Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CalFire, 2009). The Project site is located in an area that has been largely developed. No wildlands are located on or adjacent to the Project site and the Project site is largely disturbed or devoid of vegetation and surrounded on all sides by developed or maintained properties and a paved road. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. Impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2019, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Technical Appendix G

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 F.1.b
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 56 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
• Section 5.5 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
- Figure 5.5-3 – City Areas Affected by Aircraft Hazard Zones

3. Google Earth Pro

4. Moreno Valley General Plan, approved July 11, 2006

5. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, http://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/17%20- %20Vol.%201%20March%20Air%20Reserve%20Base%20Final.pdf?ver=2016-08-15-145812- 700

6. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire), https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5917/moreno_valley.pdf
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
Response: The Project would be required to comply with Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, which authorizes the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program that covers point sources of pollution discharging to a water body. The NPDES program also requires operators of construction sites one-acre or larger to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and obtain authorization to discharge stormwater under an NPDES construction stormwater permit. The Project Applicant also would be required to comply with the California Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Section 13000 et seq., of the California Water Code), which requires that comprehensive water quality control plans be developed for all waters within the State of California. The Project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

Construction-Related Impacts
Construction of the proposed Project would involve clearing, grading, paving, utility installation, building construction, and landscaping activities. Construction activities would result in the generation of potential water quality pollutants such as silt, debris, chemicals, paints, and solvents, and other chemicals with the potential to adversely affect water quality. As such, short-term water quality impacts have the potential to occur during construction of the Project in the absence of any protective or avoidance measures.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB and the City Moreno Valley (Municipal Code Chapter 8.10 et seq. and Section 8.21.170), the Project would be required to obtain coverage under the State’s General Construction Storm Water Permit (NPDES Permit). The NPDES permit is required for all projects that include construction activities, such as clearing, soil stockpiling, grading, and/or excavation that disturb at least one (1) acre of total land area. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the Santa Ana RWQCB’s Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program.

Compliance with the NPDES permit and the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Program involves the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP for construction-related activities, including grading. The SWPPP will specify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that the Project would be required to implement during construction activities to ensure that all potential pollutants of concern are prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to being discharged from the subject property. Examples of BMPs that may be utilized during construction include, but are not limited to, sandbag barriers, geotextiles, storm drain inlet protection, sediment traps, rip rap soil stabilizers, and hydro-seeding. Mandatory compliance with the SWPPP would ensure that the Project’s construction does not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Therefore, water quality impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required.

Post-Development Water Quality Impacts
Stormwater pollutants commonly associated with the land uses proposed by the Project include bacterial indicators, metals, nutrients, pesticides, toxic organic compounds, sediments, trash and debris, and oil and grease. Based on current receiving water impairments (pursuant to the Clean Water Act’s (CWA) F.1.b
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 57 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Section 303(d) list), the Project’s pollutants of concern are bacterial indicators, nutrients, pesticides, and sediments (Thatcher, 2020, Table E.1).

Pursuant to the Moreno Valley Municipal Code (Chapter 8.10 et seq. and Section 8.21.170), the Project Applicant would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to demonstrate compliance with the City’s NPDES municipal stormwater permit, and to minimize the release of potential waterborne pollutants, including pollutants of concern for downstream receiving waters. The WQMP is a site-specific post-construction water quality management program designed to address the pollutants of concern of a development project via BMPs, implementation of which ensures the on-going protection of the watershed basin. The Project’s Preliminary WQMP, prepared by Thatcher, is included as Technical Appendix I1 appended to this IS/MND. As identified in the Project’s Preliminary WQMP, the proposed Project is designed to include structural source control BMPs (including bioretention swales, two underground detention systems and two modular wetlands units) as well as operational source controls (including but not limited to: drainage system maintenance, storm drain system stenciling and signage, and implementation of minimal pesticide use) to minimize, prevent, and/or otherwise appropriately treat stormwater runoff flows before they are discharged from the site. Compliance with the WQMP would be required as a condition of Project approval pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter

8.10 and Municipal Code Section 8.21.170, and long-term maintenance of on-site BMPs would be required to ensure their long-term effectiveness. Therefore, water quality impacts associated with longterm operational activities would be less than significant.

In addition to the WQMP, the NDPES program also requires certain land uses, including industrial land uses as proposed by the Project, to prepare a SWPPP for operational activities and to implement a longterm water quality sampling and monitoring program, unless an exemption has been granted. On April 1, 2014, the California State Water Resources Control Board adopted an updated new NPDES permit for stormwater discharge associated with industrial activities (referred to as the “Industrial General Permit”). The new Industrial General Permit, which is more stringent than the existing Industrial General Permit, became effective on July 1, 2015. Under the effective NPDES Industrial General Permit, the Project would be required to prepare a SWPPP for operational activities and implement a long-term water quality sampling and monitoring program or receive an exemption. Because the permit is dependent upon the operational activities of the buildings, and the Project’s future building occupants and their operations are not known at this time, details of the SWPPP (including BMPs) or potential exemption to the SWPPP operational activities requirement cannot be determined at this time. However, based on the requirements of the NPDES Industrial General Permit, it is anticipated that the Project’s mandatory compliance with all applicable regulations would further reduce potential water quality impacts during long-term operation.

Based on the foregoing analysis, the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during long-term operation. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
Response: No potable groundwater wells are proposed by the Project. The proposed Project would be served with potable water by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). The EMWD relies on local potable groundwater as a source of its water supply (in addition to imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, desalted ground water, and recycled water). The EMWD has indicated it has sufficient available water resources, including groundwater resources, to adequately serve the Project in addition to past, present, and future commitments to supply water (EMWD, 2016a, pp. XIV-XVI). Therefore, the proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies and the Project’s impact to groundwater supplies would be less than significant.

Development of the Project would increase impervious surface coverage on the property, which would reduce the amount of water percolating down into the underground aquifer that underlies the Project site and a majority of the City. However, and as noted in the City’s General Plan EIR, “the impact of an incremental reduction in groundwater would not be significant as domestic water supplies are not reliant F.1.b
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 58 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
on groundwater as a primary source” (Moreno Valley, 2006b, p. 5.7-12). Additionally, water captured by the proposed Project’s underground detention systems and landscaped areas would have the opportunity to percolate into the ground. With buildout of the Project, the local groundwater levels would not be substantially adversely affected. Accordingly, buildout of the Project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge.

For the reasons stated above, the Project would neither substantially deplete groundwater supplies nor interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
Response: Under existing conditions, the Project site primarily drains in southerly direction, ultimately discharging to two existing storm drains at the southwest and southeast corners of the Project site (Thatcher, 2021, p. 6).

The Project would mass grade the entire property and construct two industrial warehouse buildings and associated improvements, which would change the site’s existing ground contours and alter the existing drainage patterns interior to the Project site. However, upon buildout of the Project, stormwater flow generated on the Project site would continue to be conveyed to the two existing storm drains adjacent south of the southern Project site boundary.

Although the Project would alter the subject property’s internal drainage patterns, such changes would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Under post-development conditions, a majority of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces and, therefore, the amount of exposed soils on the Project site would be minimal. Also, as discussed under Response X(a), the Project would construct an integrated storm drain system on-site with BMPs to minimize the amount of water-borne pollutants carried from the Project site. The BMPs proposed by the Project, including bioretention swales, two underground detention systems, and two modular wetlands units are highly effective at removing sediment from stormwater runoff flows. Therefore, stormwater runoff flows leaving the Project site would not carry substantial amounts of sediment. Once stormwater runoff leaves the Project site, it would be discharged into two existing storm drains located immediately southeast and southwest of the site.

Because there are no exposed soils at the Project’s discharge points, there is no potential for the Project’s stormwater runoff to result in erosion as it leaves the Project site. Accordingly, the Project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- site or off-site, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite?
Response: As described above under Response X(c(i)), proposed grading and earthwork activities on the Project site would alter the site’s existing drainage patterns but would not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the local area. Under long-term development conditions, and with on-site detention, the peak storm water runoff flows discharged from the Project site would be equal to or less than under existing conditions (Thatcher, 2021, pp. 8-9). Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface water runoff discharged from the site in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant. iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
Response: As discussed above under Response X(c(ii)), the amount of runoff discharged to the two existing storm drains adjacent south of the southern Project site boundary would be either reduced or equal to existing conditions. Furthermore, the Project’s storm drain system would be sized and designed F.1.b
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 59 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
in accordance with the area’s master drainage plan to ensure that off-site flows that are conveyed through the Project site and flows originating off-site are discharged from the site at a volume and rate that can be accommodated by existing and planned downstream storm drain facilities (Thatcher, 2021, pp. 2-3, 8-9). Accordingly, the Project would not create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of any existing or planned storm water drainage system, and impacts would be less than significant.

As discussed under Response X(a), the proposed Project would be required to comply with a future SWPPP and the Project’s WQMP (Technical Appendix I1), which identify required BMPs to be incorporated into the Project to ensure that near-term construction activities and long-term postdevelopment activities of the proposed Project would not result in substantial amounts of polluted runoff.

Therefore, with mandatory compliance with the Project’s SWPPP and WQMP, the proposed Project would not create or contribute substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and impacts would be less than significant.
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
Response: According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 06065C0745G, the Project site is located within “Zone X (unshaded)”, which are areas determined to be an area with a 0.2% chance of annual flood (FEMA, 2008). The Zone X (unshaded) designation is considered to be an area of minimal flood hazard and is not considered a special flood hazard area. Accordingly, the Project site is not expected to be inundated by flood flows during the lifetime of the Project and the Project would not impede flood flows. No impact would occur.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Response: The Pacific Ocean is located over 40 miles southwest of the Project site (Google Earth Pro, 2020); consequently, there is no potential for the Project site to be impacted by a tsunami as tsunamis typically only reach up to a few miles inland. The nearest large body of water to the Project site is Lake Perris, with the dam located approximately 5.3 miles southeast of the Project site. According to City of Moreno Valley General Plan FEIR Figure 5.5-2, Floodplains, and High Fire Hazard Areas, the Project site is not located in an identified inundation area (Moreno Valley, 2006b); therefore, risk of inundation by dam failure or seiche is low. Additionally, there are no levees in the vicinity of the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Response: As discussed under Response X(a) above, the Project site is located within the Santa Ana River Basin and Project-related construction and operational activities would be required to comply with the Santa Ana RWQCB’s Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan by preparing and adhering to a SWPPP and WQMP. Implementation of the Project would not conflict with or obstruct the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan and impacts would be less than significant.

Additionally, as discussed under Response X(a) above, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies nor interfere substantially with groundwater recharge and, therefore, is not expected to conflict with or obstruct a sustainable groundwater management plan. Further, EMWD produces potable groundwater from the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin, which is an adjudicated basin (DWR, n.d.). Adjudicated basins are exempt from the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) requirement to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plan because such basins already operate under a court-ordered water management plan to ensure their long-term sustainability. No component of the Project would obstruct with or prevent implementation of the management plan for the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin. As such, the Project’s construction and operation would not conflict with any sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Thatcher, 2020, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, Technical Appendix I1

2. Thatcher, 2021, Preliminary Drainage Study, Technical Appendix I2.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 60 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) – Flood Map Service Center: Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 06065C0745G https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home

4. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.5 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
- Figure 5.5-2 – Floodplains and High Fire Hazard Areas • Section 5.7 – Hydrology and Water Quality

5. Google Earth Pro

6. Eastern Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/urbanwatermanagementplan_0.pdf?1537303453

7. Department of Water Resources, Adjudicated Basins Annual Reporting, https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/index.jsp?appid=adjbasin XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Response: Development of the Project would not physically disrupt or divide the arrangement of an established community. Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by Alessandro Boulevard to the north and bordered by vacant, undeveloped land to the east and west. The properties to the immediate south and southwest of the Project site are developed with warehouses; therefore, the Project would serve as an extension of the existing development patterns in the area. No impact would occur. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect?
Response: The Project includes an amendment to the City of Moreno Valley General Plan Land Use Map that would change the Project site’s land use designation from “Commercial” to “Business Park/Light Industrial.” Approval of the requested General Plan Amendment would eliminate any potential inconsistency between proposed land use and the site’s existing land use designation. Impacts to the environment associated with the Project’s proposed General Plan Amendment are evaluated throughout this IS/MND, and where significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures are imposed to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. There are no environmental impacts that would result as a specific consequence of the proposed changes to the site’s General Plan land use designation, beyond what is already evaluated and disclosed by this IS/MND.

The Project would not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the SCAQMD’s AQMP, SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) (including the tentatively approved Connect SoCal 2020-2045 RTP/SCS), and SCAG’s Regional Comprehensive Plan. Impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley Zoning Map, http://www.moreno-valley.ca.us/cdd/pdfs/ZoningMap.pdf

2. Moreno Valley Adopted Land Use Map, http://www.moreno-valley.ca.us/city_hall/generalplan/landuse-map.pdf

3. Google Earth Pro
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
Response: The Project site is not located within an area known to be underlain by regionally- or locallyimportant mineral resources (Moreno Valley, 2006b, p. 5.14-2). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State of California. In addition, the City’s General Plan EIR does not identify any locally-important mineral resource recovery sites on-site or within proximity to the Project site (Moreno Valley, 2006b, p. 5.14-2). Accordingly, no impact would occur.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 61 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan,
or other land use plan?
Response: Refer to Response XII(a), above. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site. No impact would occur.

Sources:

1. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.14 – Mineral Resources
XIII. NOISE – Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
Response: A Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, 2020e) was prepared for the Project by Urban Crossroads to evaluate Project-related long-term operational and short-term construction noise impacts.

This report is included as Technical Appendix J to this IS/MND and its findings are incorporated into the analysis presented herein.

The analysis presented below summarizes the Project’s potential construction noise levels and operational noise levels. The detailed noise calculations for the analysis presented here are provided in Appendices 7.1, 9.1, and 10.1 of Technical Appendix J.

Construction Noise Impact Analysis
Construction activities on the Project site would create temporary periods of noise when heavy construction equipment is in operation and would cause a short-term increase in ambient noise levels.

Maximum daytime construction noise levels at representative sensitive receptor locations near the Project site are summarized in Table 8, Daytime Construction Equipment Noise Level Summary.

Table 8: Daytime Construction Equipment Noise Level Summary 1Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 10-A of Technical Appendix J. 2Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area) to the nearest receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 10.1 of Technical Appendix J.

Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 10-2)
As shown on Table 8, the Project’s daytime construction noise levels are expected to range from 48.0 to

61.9 A-weighted decibels (dBA) equivalent sound level (Leq) at the nearby receiver locations and range from 55.4 to 63.7 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the Project site. Project construction noise levels are considered exempt from the noise limits specified in the City of Moreno Valley’s Municipal Code if F.1.b
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 62 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
activities occur within the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Municipal Code Section 11.80.030(D)(7)).

Because Project-related construction activities are expected to occur during daylight hours, Project construction would not exceed the standards established by the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code and impacts would be less than significant.

Notwithstanding, there is the potential that specific Project construction activities could occur outside of the construction hours permitted by right in the Municipal Code. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section

11.80.030(D)(7), the City of Moreno Valley would be required to approve any nighttime construction activities. If nighttime construction activities were to occur, noise levels above 60 dBA Leq during the nighttime hours would exceed the standards established in the City’s Municipal Code Section

11.80.030(C). The only Project construction activities that have a reasonable potential to occur during nighttime hours are concrete pouring. As shown in Table 9, nighttime concrete pouring activities would not exceed 56.5 dBA Leq at the nearby sensitive receiver locations or 57.6 dBA Leq at a distance of 200 feet from the Project site; neither noise level would exceed the standard established by the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code. Impacts during potential nighttime concrete pouring activities would be less than significant.

Table 9: Nighttime Construction Equipment Noise Level Summary 1Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 10-A of Technical Appendix J. 2Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area) to the nearest receiver locations.

CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 10.1 of Technical Appendix J. 3Per Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 11.80.030(C). 4Is the applicable standard exceeded? Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 10-4)
Operational Noise Impact Analysis
Stationary (on-site) noise sources associated with long-term Project operation are expected to include idling trucks, delivery truck and automobile parking, delivery truck backup alarms, roof-mounted equipment (e.g., heating/ventilation equipment), as well as noise associated with the loading and unloading of dry goods. The daytime and nighttime stationary maximum noise levels associated with Project operation at nearby sensitive receptor locations (the same receptor locations used for the construction analysis, above) and at a distance of 200 feet from the Project site are summarized in Table 10, Operational Noise Level Compliance.

As shown in Table 10, Project operations would not expose any nearby receptor to noise levels during daytime or nighttime hours in excess of City standards. The Project’s operational noise would contribute a maximum of 0.6 dBA Leq and 0.8 dBA Leq to the existing daytime and nighttime ambient noise environment, respectively in the Project area (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, pp. 48-49). Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not result in the exposure of receivers near the Project site to stationary noise levels that exceed the standards established in the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code. Impacts would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 63 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 10: Operational Noise Level Compliance
1See Exhibit 8-A of Technical Appendix J for the receiver locations. 2Proposed Project operational noise levels as shown on Tables 9-3 and 9-4 of Technical Appendix J. 3Exterior noise level standards for source (commercial) land use, as shown on Table 4-1 of Technical Appendix J. 4Do the estimated Project operational noise source activities exceed the noise level standards? "Daytime" = 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:01 p.m. - 7:59 a.m.

Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 9-5)
Operational Noise Impact Analysis – Traffic Noise
To evaluate permanent, off-site noise increases that could result from Project-related traffic, noise levels were modeled for the following traffic scenarios:
• Existing: This scenario refers to the existing traffic noise conditions without and with the proposed Project.
• Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project (EAP): This scenario refers to the existing traffic noise conditions plus ambient growth without and with the proposed Project.

Traffic noise contours and noise levels were established based on existing and projected future traffic conditions on off-site roadway segments within the Project’s study area, and do not take into account the effect of any existing noise barriers or topography that may affect ambient noise levels. Refer to Technical Appendix J for a detailed description of the methodology used to evaluate the Project’s trafficrelated noise effects.

Table 11, Existing plus Project Traffic Noise Impacts, presents a comparison of the existing noise conditions along Project study area roadway segments and the noise levels that would result with addition of Project-related traffic. Under Existing plus Project conditions, noise levels along roadway segments within the Project study area would increase between 0.0 and 2.0 dBA CNEL, which would not exceed the applicable significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project’s contribution to off-site traffic noise would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels and Project-related impacts would be less than significant.

Table 12, Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Traffic Noise Impacts, presents a comparison of the existing noise conditions along Project study area roadway segments and the noise levels that would result with addition of ambient growth and Project-related traffic. Under Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project, noise levels along roadway segments within the Project study area would increase between

0.0 and 1.9 dBA CNEL, which would not exceed the applicable significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project’s contribution to off-site traffic noise would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels and Project-related impacts would be less than significant.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 64 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 11: Existing plus Project Traffic Noise Impacts
1Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the receiving land use.
3Does the Project create an incremental noise level increase exceeding the significance criteria (Table 4-1 of Technical Appendix J)?
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 7-5)
Table 12: Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project Traffic Noise Impacts 1Based on a review of existing aerial imagery. Noise sensitive uses limited to existing residential land uses. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the receiving land use.
3Does the Project create an incremental noise level increase exceeding the significance criteria (Table 4-1 of Technical Appendix J)?
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 7-6)
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels?
Response: The analysis presented below demonstrates that implementation of the Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels.

Construction Analysis
Construction activities on the Project site would utilize construction equipment that has the potential to generate vibration. Table 13, Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, below, summarizes Project construction vibration levels at receiver locations near the Project site. As shown in Table 12, all receiver locations in the vicinity of the Project site would be exposed to vibration levels that fall below the City of Moreno Valley’s significance threshold (i.e., 78 vibration decibels (VdB) for daytime residential uses, 84 VdB for daytime office use at all receiver locations and at 200 feet from the property line of the source).

Accordingly, Project construction would not generate temporary, excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels and a less than significant impact would occur.

Operational Analysis
Under long-term conditions, the proposed Project would not include nor require equipment, facilities, or activities that would result in substantial or perceptible groundborne vibration. Trucks would travel toand-from the Project site during long-term operation; however, vibration levels for heavy trucks operating F.1.b
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 65 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table 13: Construction Equipment Vibration Levels
1Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 10-A of Technical Appendix J. 2Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 10-5 of Technical Appendix J. 3FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment maximum acceptable vibration criteria as shown in Section 3.5 of Technical Appendix J. 4Does the vibration level exceed the maximum acceptable vibration threshold? Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Table 10-6)
at low-to-normal speeds on smooth, paved surfaces – as is expected on the Project site and along surrounding roadways – typically do not exceed 65 VdB. Truck deliveries transiting on-site would travel at very low speeds, so it is expected long-term operations at the Project site would not exceed the City’s allowable levels. Accordingly, long-term operation of the Project would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Response: The Project site is located approximately 1.0-mile northeast of the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport (MARB/IPA). Based on the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the MARB/IPA, the Project is located outside of the Airport’s 60 dBA CNEL noise level contours (RCALUC, 2014, Map MA-4), and therefore, represents a moderate to low risk with regard to airport noise. Additionally, the proposed use for the site would not conflict with the allowable uses described in the ALUCP (RCALUC, 2014, Table MA-2). Accordingly, the proposed Project would not expose people residing or working the Project area to excessive noise levels from a public airport; therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.4 – Noise
- Figure 6-2 – Buildout Noise Contours

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.4 – Noise
- Figure 5.4-1 – March Air Reserve Base Noise Impact Area

3. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 11.80 Noise Regulations

4. March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, adopted November 13, 2014

5. Urban Crossroads, 2020e, Compass Danbe Centerpointe Noise Impact Analysis, Technical Appendix J
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 66 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth
in an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
road or other infrastructure)?
Response: The proposed Project would result in development of the subject property with industrial land uses that would add employment opportunities to the area. It is anticipated that the employment base for both the construction and operational phases of the Project would come from the existing population in the Inland Empire, which comprises western Riverside County and southwestern San Bernardino County. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario region’s civilian labor force contains approximately 2,032,794 persons with approximately 1,809,690 people employed and an unemployment rate of approximately 11.0% (approximately 223,607 persons) (USBLS, 2020). Accordingly, the Project region already contains an ample supply of potential employees under existing conditions and the Project’s labor demand is not expected to draw substantial numbers of new residents to the area. Furthermore, approximately 86% of City of Moreno Valley residents commute outside of the City for work (SCAG, 2019, p. 21); therefore, the Project would provide job opportunities closer to home for existing and future Moreno Valley residents.

There are no components of the Project that would reasonably result in indirect or unplanned population growth because the surrounding area is mostly developed under existing conditions or approved for development. The Project would install new/expanded infrastructure; however, this infrastructure would either be master-planned facilities (meaning the facilities would be installed with or without the Project) or would be private facilities for the sole use of the Project (meaning they would not be available for general public use). Accordingly, no significant indirect impacts associated with population growth would result from any Project-related improvements because the Project and its required improvements would not induce substantial growth on surrounding properties.

Based on the foregoing analysis, neither the Project nor any Project-related component would result in substantial, direct, or indirect population growth that would cause a significant direct or indirect impact to the environment. This impact is less than significant.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Response: The Project site does not contain any residential structures and no people live on the site under existing conditions. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people and would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur.

Sources:

1. Google Earth Pro

2. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) – Profile of the City of Moreno Valley, https://www.scag.ca.gov/Documents/MorenoValley.pdf

3. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics – Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Economy at a Glance on August 2020,
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LAUMT064014000000006?amp%253bdata_tool=XGtable&outp ut_view=data&include_graphs=true
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES – Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
Response: Fire protection services to the Project site are provided by the Moreno Valley Fire Department (MVFD). The Project site is served by the Kennedy Park Fire Station (Station No. 65) located F.1.b
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 67 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
at 15111 Indian Avenue, approximately 2.0 roadway miles to the southeast of the Project site, and the Towngate Fire Station (Station No. 6) located at 22250 Eucalyptus Avenue, approximately 2.5 roadway miles to the northwest of the Project site. Based on the Project site’s proximity to the two existing fire stations, the Project would be adequately served by fire protection services, and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. The Project Applicant is required to comply with the provisions of the City of Moreno Valley’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) Ordinance (Ordinance No. 695), which requires a fee payment that the City applies to the funding of public facilities, including fire protection facilities. Mandatory compliance with the DIF Ordinance would be required prior to the issuance of a building permit.

The Project would feature a minimum of fire safety and fire suppression activities, including type of building construction, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, and paved access. The proposed buildings would be of concrete tilt-up construction that contain a low fire hazard risk rating. In addition, a fire alarm system is proposed to be installed, as well as ceiling-mounted sprinklers that are designed to suppress a fire. To suppress a fire does not necessarily mean it will extinguish the fire but rather it is meant to "knock" the fire back down to its source, making it more manageable for the MVFD to extinguish.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed Project would receive adequate fire protection service and would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. Impacts to fire protection facilities would be less than significant.
ii) Police protection?
Response: The Project would introduce two new building structures and employees to the Project site, which would result in an incremental increase in demand for police protection services, but is not anticipated to require or result in the construction of new or physically altered police facilities.

Furthermore, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with the provisions of Moreno Valley’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) Ordinance (Ordinance No. 695), which requires a fee payment that the City applies to the funding of public facilities, including police protection facilities. Mandatory compliance with the DIF Ordinance would be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Based on the foregoing, the proposed Project would receive adequate police protection service, and would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. Impacts to police protection facilities would therefore be less than significant.
iii) Schools?
Response: Implementation of the Project would not create a direct demand for public school services, as the subject property would contain non-residential uses and would not generate any school-aged children requiring public education. The addition of employment-generating uses on the Project site would assist the City in achieving its goal to provide a better jobs/housing balance within the City and the larger western Riverside County region (Moreno Valley, 2006b, pp. 5.12-1). The proposed Project is not expected to draw a substantial number of new residents to the region and would therefore not indirectly generate school-aged students requiring public education. Because the proposed Project would not directly generate students and is not expected to indirectly draw students to the area, the proposed Project would not cause or contribute to a need to construct new or physically altered public school facilities. Although the Project would not create a demand for additional public school services, the Project Applicant would be required to contribute development impact fees to the Moreno Valley Unified School District in compliance with California Senate Bill 50 (Greene), which allows school districts to collect fees from new developments to offset the costs associated with increasing school capacity needs.

Mandatory payment of school fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Impacts to public schools would be less than significant.
iv) Parks?
Response: As discussed under Responses XVI(a) and XV(b) below, the Project would not create a demand for public park facilities and would not result in the need to modify existing or construct new park facilities. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not adversely affect any park facility. Thus, no impact would occur.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 68 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
v) Other public facilities?
Response: The Project is not expected to result in a demand for other public facilities/services, including libraries, community recreation centers, post offices, and/or animal shelters. As such, implementation of the Project would not adversely affect other public facilities or require the construction of new or modified public facilities and no impact would occur.

Sources:

1. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan • City of Moreno Valley Land Use Map
- Figure 5.4-1 – March Air Reserve Base Noise Impact Area

2. Moreno Valley Fire Department – Strategic Plan 2012-2022

3. California Legislative Information – Senate Bill 50 (Greene), Approved August 27, 1998, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/97-98/bill/sen/sb_0001-
0050/sb_50_bill_19980827_chaptered.html

4. Google Earth Pro

5. City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code
• Chapter 3.42 “Commercial and Industrial Development Impact Fees” – Ordinance 695 XVI. RECREATION – Would the project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
Response: The Project would develop the subject property with industrial land uses. The Project does not propose any type of residential use or other land use that may generate a population that would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the increased use or substantial physical deterioration of an existing neighborhood or regional park, thus, no impact would occur. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
Response: The Project does not propose to construct any new on- or off-site recreation facilities.

Additionally, the Project would not expand any existing off-site recreational facilities. Therefore, environmental effects related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities would not occur.

Sources:

1. Project Application Materials – Site Plan
XVII.TRANSPORTATION – Would the project:
a) Conflict with program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities?
Response: The Project would not conflict with applicable objectives from the Moreno Valley General Plan Circulation Element, including Objective 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 (discussed in more detail below), 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,

5.9, 5.10, and 5.11. In addition, Project would not conflict with the City’s Bicycle Master Plan nor with the vehicular and non-vehicular goals from SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, including goals to: 1) maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region; 2) ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region; 3) preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system; 4) protect the environment and health of residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation; and 5) encouraging land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and active transportation.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 69 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
In accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) adopted changes to the CEQA Guidelines in December 2018, which identify that starting on July 1, 2020, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is the appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts. As of December 2018, when the revised CEQA Guidelines were adopted, automobile delay, as measured by “level of service” (LOS) and other similar metrics, no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA. Lead agencies in California are required to use VMT to evaluate project-related transportation impacts. The VMT analysis for the Project is provided in Response XVII(b) below.

Notwithstanding, the City of Moreno Valley traffic study guidelines requires a traffic analysis based on LOS, which the City uses in part to demonstrate compliance with General Plan Circulation Element Objective 5.3, which states that the City shall maintain LOS C on roadway links wherever possible and LOS D in the vicinity of SR-60 and employment centers, and to determine transportation improvement obligations of development projects. For this reason, although LOS cannot be used to make a conclusion of a significant environmental effect, the Project’s impact to transportation facilities based on LOS is provided herein for informational purposes. The LOS analysis provided on the following pages is based on a traffic impact analysis report prepared by the consulting form Urban Crossroads and included as Technical Appendix K1 to this IS/MND (Urban Crossroads, 2021a). The traffic impact analysis was prepared in conformance with the City of Moreno Valley’s Transportation Impact Analysis Preparation Guide for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (June 2020).

Project Study Area
The Project’s traffic study area (hereafter “Project study area” or “study area”) was devised based on the City of Moreno Valley traffic impact analysis guidelines and consultation with City of Moreno Valley staff via the City’s standard scoping process. The study area includes the intersections listed in Table 14, Intersection Analysis Locations.

Table 14: Intersection Analysis Locations
Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, Table 1-1)
Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, historic traffic counts from 2018 were used in conjunction with a 4.04 percent growth factor to reflect expected “normal” 2020 traffic conditions (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 22). Based on the collected data, all existing intersections in the Project study area operate at a level of service (LOS) of “C” or better during the AM and PM peak hours (7:00-9:00am and 4:00- 6:00pm, respectively) (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 22). Refer to Technical Appendix K1 for more information about existing traffic conditions in the Project study area.

Thresholds of Significance
The Project would result in a conflict with General Plan Circulation Element Objective 5.3 if, under Opening Year traffic conditions, Project traffic would:
• Cause a signalized intersection to degrade from either LOS C or better or LOS D or better to LOS D/E/F or LOS E/F, respectively; or increase the delay by 5.0 or more seconds at a signalized intersection that operates at an unacceptable level of service (i.e., LOS D or LOS E/F) without the Project (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 14).
• Cause an unsignalized intersection to degrade from either LOS C or better or LOS D or better to LOS D/E/F or LOS E/F, respectively; or increase the delay by 5.0 or more seconds at an unsignalized intersection that operates at an unacceptable level of service (i.e., LOS D or LOS E/F) without the Project and the intersection meets the peak hour traffic signal warrant after the addition of Project traffic (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 14).

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 70 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Project Trip Generation and Distribution
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted to and produced by a development project. Buildings 1 and 2 are evaluated as 70 percent warehouse use and 30 percent high-cube cold storage warehouse use each. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (2017) includes a trip generation rate for warehouse uses (ITE land use code 150) and high-cube cold storage warehouse uses (ITE land use code 157). The assumptions for the mix of trucks, by axle type, relies on recommendations from the SCAQMD Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage (2014). Based on the guidance from the SCAQMD, the following truck fleet mix under ITE land use code 150 was utilized for the purposes of estimating the truck trip generation for Buildings 1 and 2: 16.7% of the total trucks as 2-axle trucks, 20.7% of the total trucks as 3-axle trucks, and 62.6% of the total trucks as 4+-axle trucks (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 29). The following truck fleet mix under ITE land use code 157 was utilized for the purposes of estimating the truck trip generation for Buildings 1 and 2: 34.7% of the total trucks as 2-axle trucks, 11.0% of the total trucks as 3-axle trucks, and 54.3% of the total trucks as 4+-axle trucks (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 29).

Based on the assumptions described above, the Project is calculated to generate approximately 742 total vehicle trips per day, including 59 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour (7:00-9:00am) and 64 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour (4:00-6:00pm) (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, p. 31). Of the Project’s 742 daily vehicle trips, 224 would be from trucks with two or more axles (ibid.). In conformance with standard traffic engineering practices in Southern California, the Project’s daily vehicle trips were converted to a passenger car equivalent (PCE). PCE factors allow the typical “real-world” mix of vehicle types to be represented as a single, standardized unit (i.e., the passenger car). A PCE factor of 1.5 was applied to two-axle truck trips, a factor of 2.0 was applied to three-axle truck trips, and a factor of 3.0 was applied to four plus-axle truck trips (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, pp. 31, 33). The Project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,062 daily PCE trips, including 21 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 81 PCE trips during the PM peak hour (ibid.). The Project’s PCE vehicle trips were used for purposes of the LOS analysis. For more information about the Project’s trip generation, refer to Technical Appendix K1.

Trip distribution is the process of identifying the probable destinations, directions, or traffic routes that would be utilized by Project traffic. The potential interaction between the planned land uses and surrounding regional access routes are considered to identify the routes where Project traffic would distribute. The trip distribution for the Project was developed based on anticipated passenger car and truck travel patterns to-and-from the Project site. The total volume on each roadway was divided by the Project’s total traffic generation to indicate the percentage of Project traffic that would use each component of the roadway system in each relevant direction.

The assignment of traffic from the Project area to the adjoining roadway system is based on the Project trip generation, trip distribution, and the arterial highway and local street system improvements that would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the Project. Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, PCE factored Project average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for the weekday are shown on Exhibit 4-3 in Technical Appendix K1.

Analysis Scenarios
The Project contribution of traffic to the local circulation network were assessed for each of the following conditions:
• Near-term Construction; and
• Opening Year (2022)
The Near-Term Construction conditions analysis determines the potential for the Project’s constructionrelated traffic to result in an adverse effect to the local roadway system. Types of traffic anticipated during construction include construction workers traveling to/from the Project site as well as deliveries of construction materials to the Project site.

The Opening Year (2022) analysis includes an evaluation of traffic conditions at the Project’s “opening year.” The Opening Year (2022) analysis considers existing traffic + ambient growth + Project traffic.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 71 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Near-term Construction Traffic Conditions
During the Project’s construction phase, traffic to-and-from the subject property would be generated by construction employee trips, delivery of construction materials, and delivery/use of heavy equipment.

Vehicular traffic from construction employees would be substantially less than daily and peak hour traffic volumes generated during Project operational activities because construction activities typically begin/end outside of the peak hour; therefore, a most – if not all – construction employees would not be driving to/from the Project site during hours of peak congestion. Because Project operations would not conflict with the LOS standards from Circulation Element Objective 5.3 under Opening Year (2022) traffic conditions (see “Opening Year (2022) Traffic Conditions,” below) and because construction worker peak hour trips would be substantially less than the peak hour trips generated by Project operations, traffic from construction workers is not expected to conflict with the LOS performance standards of Circulation Element Objective 5.3.

Deliveries of construction materials to the Project site also would make nominal traffic contributions to the local roadway network because most trips would occur during non-peak hours and the total volume of trips would be less than the Project’s operational trips, which are shown below to not conflict with Circulation Element Objective 5.3. Furthermore, construction materials would be delivered to the site throughout the construction phase based on need and would not occur on an everyday basis. Heavy equipment would be utilized on the Project site during the construction phase. As most heavy equipment is not authorized to be driven on public roadways, most equipment would be delivered and removed from the site via flatbed trucks. As with the delivery of construction materials, the delivery of heavy equipment to the Project site would not occur on a daily basis, but would occur periodically throughout the construction phase based on need.

Based on the foregoing analysis, traffic generated by the Project’s construction phase would not result in a conflict with the LOS performance standards contained in Circulation Element Objective 5.3.

Opening Year (2022) Traffic Conditions
As shown in Table 15, all Project study area intersections would operate at acceptable LOS under Opening Year (2022) traffic conditions. Therefore, the Project would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the LOS performance standards contained in Circulation Element Objective 5.3.

Table 15: Intersection Analysis for Opening Year (2022) Traffic Conditions 1Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown.
2CSS = Cross-street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Improvement Source: (Urban Crossroads, 2021a, Table 5-1)
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Response: As previously discussed, SB 743, which approved in 2013, was intended to change the way transportation impacts are determined according to CEQA. Updates to the CEQA Guidelines that were adopted in December 2018 included the addition of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, of which F.1.b
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 72 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Subdivision “b” establishes criteria for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts based on project type and using automobile VMT as the metric. As a component of OPR’s revisions to the CEQA Guidelines, lead agencies were required to adopt VMT thresholds of significance by July 1, 2020. The City of Moreno Valley adopted its Transportation Impact Analysis Preparation Guide for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment in June 2020, which is used in this analysis to determine the significance of Project-related VMT.

According to the VMT analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (Technical Appendix K2), the Project’s VMT per employee would exceed the City’s VMT per employee threshold by approximately 11.7% under baseline (Year 2020) traffic conditions when the Project’s location and Project design features are not considered (Urban Crossroads, 2021b, p. 5). With consideration of the Project’s location and Project design features, including: 1) the Project’s geographic location as an employment use in proximity to existing residential and commercial service land uses – which would reduce Project-related employee VMT from employee commutes, errands during break periods, etc.; and 2) sidewalks along the Project site frontage with Alessandro Boulevard which would facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel to the site, the Project-related VMT would be reduced by approximately 15% and would fall below the City’s significance threshold (Urban Crossroads, 2021b, p. 8). Therefore, based on the City’s VMT significance guidelines, the Project would have a less-than-significant direct VMT impact and, therefore, would not conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(b). c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
Response: The types of traffic generated during operation of the Project (i.e., passenger cars and trucks) would be compatible with the type of traffic observed along Project study area roadways under existing conditions. In addition, all proposed improvements within the public right-of-way would be installed in conformance with City of Moreno Valley design standards. The City reviewed the Project’s application materials and determined that no hazardous transportation design features would be introduced through implementation of the Project. Accordingly, the Project’s construction and operation would not create or substantially increase safety hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use.

Implementation of the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Response: The Project would result in the construction of two warehouse buildings on the Project site, which would require the need for emergency access to-and-from the site. During the course of the City of Moreno Valley’s review of the proposed Project, the Project’s design was reviewed to ensure that adequate access to-and-from the site is provided for emergency vehicles. The City of Moreno Valley also will require the Project to provide adequate paved access to-and-from the site as a condition of Project approval. The Project’s proposed driveways would connect directly to Alessandro Boulevard, and the Project does not propose any changes to public roads other than frontage improvements along Alessandro Boulevard that would improve local circulation/access. Furthermore, the City of Moreno Valley will review all future Project construction drawings to ensure that adequate emergency access is maintained along abutting public streets during temporary construction activities. With required adherence to City requirements for emergency vehicle access, impacts would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. Urban Crossroads, 2021a, Traffic Analysis, Technical Appendix K1

2. Urban Crossroads, 2021b, Vehicle Miles Travelled Analysis, Technical Appendix K2

3. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 73 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.

Response: A Phase I Cultural Resources Study (Technical Appendix C) was prepared for the Project site by BFSA. The Phase I Cultural Resources Study included a records search with the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at University of California Riverside in order to assess previous archaeological studies and identify any previously recorded tribal cultural resources within the Project site. Additionally, as part of preparation of the Phase I Cultural Recourses Study, BFSA also requested a records search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands Files (SLF). According to BFSA’s search of EIC records and NAHC SLFs, no tribal cultural resources listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources are present on the Project site or previously recorded on the Project site. In addition, the Project site is highly disturbed and no tribal cultural resources were observed on the Project site or in the Project site’s immediate vicinity. (BFSA, 2020a, p. 1.0-1)
As part of the SB 18/AB 52 consultation process required by State law, the City of Moreno Valley sent notification of the Project to Native American tribes with possible traditional or cultural affiliation to the Project area. In response to the AB 52 consultation invitation, five tribes contacted the City to request formal consultation. The City met with each tribe and concluded tribal consultation on June 16, 2021.

During the course of the tribal consultation process, no Native American tribe provided the City with substantial evidence indicating that tribal cultural resources, as defined in Public Resources Code section 21074, are present on the Project site or have been found previously on the Project site. Notwithstanding, due to the Project site’s location in an area where multiple Native American tribes are known to have a cultural affiliation, there is the possibility that prehistoric archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, could be encountered during ground-disturbing construction activities – although this is considered unlikely due to the pervasive, historic and on-going disturbances that have occurred on the Project site. Were a tribal cultural resource, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, to be found on the Project site during construction – and not protected – a significant impact would occur.

Implementation of MMs TCR-1 through TCR-6, would ensure the proper identification and subsequent treatment of any significant tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with Project development. With implementation of the required mitigation, the Project’s potential impact to significant tribal cultural resources would be reduced to less-than-significant.

Mitigation
MM TCR-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all mass grading and trenching activities. The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process F.1.b
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 74 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a) Project grading and development scheduling;
b) The Project archeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) as defined in MM TCR-1 shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an asneeded basis; c) The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

MM TCR-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians for tribal monitoring. The Developer is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the tribes of all mass grading and trenching activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. If the Native American Tribal Representatives suspect that an archaeological resource may have been unearthed, the Project Archaeologist or the Tribal Representatives shall immediately redirect grading operations in a 100-foot radius around the find to allow identification and evaluation of the suspected resource. In consultation with the Native American Tribal Representatives, the Project Archaeologist shall evaluate the suspected resource and make a determination of significance pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2.

MM TCR-3 In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to MM TCR-1. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed.

No recordation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in MM TCR-1.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 75 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
MM TCR-4 The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan:
“If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find."
MM TCR-5 If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site, work in the affected area must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource.

Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration, and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in MM TCR1 before any further work commences in the affected area.

MM TCR-6 If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains (California Public Resources Code 5097.98).

Sources:

1. Brian F. Smith and Associates, 2020a, Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project, Technical Appendix C
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Response: The Project would construct an on-site network of water and sewer pipes and stormwater facilities that would connect to existing water, sewer, and storm drain lines beneath Alessandro Boulevard and along the southern Project site boundary. The Project also would remove existing wooden power poles and underground existing overhead power lines (less than 115kV) along the south side of Alessandro Boulevard abutting the Project site and install connections to existing electricity, natural gas, and communications infrastructure that already exist in the area, and all such connections would be accomplished in conformance with the rules and standards enforced by the applicable service provider.

The installation of water and sewer line connections, stormwater drainage facilities, electricity, natural gas, and communications infrastructure as proposed by the Project would result in physical impacts to the environment; however, these impacts are considered to be part of the Project’s construction phase and are evaluated throughout this IS/MND accordingly. In instances where significant environmental impacts have been identified for the Project’s construction phase, mitigation measures are recommended in each applicable subsection of this IS/MND to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. The construction of utility infrastructure necessary to serve the proposed Project would not result in any significant physical effects on the environment that are not already identified and disclosed as part of this IS/MND. Accordingly, additional mitigation measures beyond those identified throughout this IS/MND would not be required.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 76 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple
dry years?
Response: EMWD is responsible for supplying potable water to the Project site and its region. As discussed in the 2015 EMWD Urban Water Management Plan, herein incorporated by reference as the “UWMP,” which applies to and was adopted by the EMWD, adequate water supplies are projected to be available to meet EMWD’s estimated water demand through 2040 under normal, historic single-dry and historic multiple-dry year conditions (EMWD, 2016a, p. XV). EMWD forecasts for projected water demand are based on the population projections of SCAG, which rely on the adopted land use designations contained within the general plans that cover the geographic area within EMWD’s service.

The water use projections utilized in the 2015 EMWD UWMP were based on the site’s existing “Commercial” land use designation on the City of Moreno Valley Land Use Map. The Project would change the site’s land use designation to “Business Park/Light Industrial” and would operate the site as a light industrial land use (i.e., warehousing). According to EMWD’s Water System Planning & Design manual, commercial and industrial development have the same average daily water demand rate (2,000 gpd per acre) (EMWD, 2007, p. 4). Because the Project’s water demand would be identical to the projection for the site’s existing land use designation (as mentioned above), the determination of the 2015 EMWD UWMP remains valid and EMWD would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements/resources and no new or expanded entitlements are needed. The Project’s impact would be less than significant.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
Response: Wastewater generated by the Project would be treated by the EMWD, which operates the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. Based upon EMWD’s wastewater generation rate of 1,700 gallons per day (gpd) per acre for industrial light land uses, the proposed Project would generate approximately 30,090 gallons of wastewater per day (1,700 gpd per acre × 17.7 Project acres = 30,090 gpd). Under existing conditions, the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 5.4 million gallons per day (mgpd). Implementation of the Project would utilize approximately 0.6% of the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility daily excess treatment capacity (EMWD, 2016b). Accordingly, the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility has sufficient capacity to treat wastewater generated by the Project in addition to existing commitments. The Project would not create the need for any new or expanded wastewater facility (such as conveyance lines, treatment facilities, or lift stations). Because there is adequate capacity at existing treatment facilities to serve the Project’s projected sewer demand, impacts would be less than significant. d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Response: Implementation of the Project would generate an incremental increase in solid waste volumes requiring off-site disposal during short-term construction and long-term operational activities.

Solid waste generated by the Project would be disposed at the El Sobrante Landfill and/or the Badlands Sanitary Landfill.

The El Sobrante Landfill is permitted to receive 16,054 tons of refuse per day and has a total capacity of 209,910,000 cubic yards. According the CalRecycle, the El Sobrante Landfill has a total remaining capacity of 143,977,170 cubic yards. The El Sobrante Landfill is estimated to reach capacity, at the earliest time, in the year 2051 (CalRecycle, 2019a). In July 2020 (the most recent period for which disposal volumes are available), the average daily disposal at the El Sobrante Landfill was approximately 11,003 tons, which correlates to an excess daily disposal capacity of approximately 5,051 tons (CalRecycle, 2020a).

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 77 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The Badlands Sanitary landfill is permitted to accept a maximum of 4,800 tons of solid waste per day. In July 2020, the most recent time period for which disposal data was publicly available, the Badlands Sanitary Landfill was receiving an average of 2,709 tons of waste per day, which correlates to an excess daily disposal capacity of approximately 2,091 tons (CalRecycle, 2020b). The Badlands Sanitary Landfill has available capacity until at least the year 2021; however, future landfill expansion opportunities may exist at this site. (CalRecycle, 2019b)
The analysis below summarizes the Project’s potential to generate solid waste during construction and/or operation that would exceed the disposal capacity of local landfill facilities. As demonstrated in the analysis below, the Project would generate less-than-significant volumes of solid waste.

Construction Impact Analysis
Based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (U.S. EPA) construction waste generation factor of 4.34 pounds of solid waste generated for the construction of every 1 s.f. for nonresidential uses, Project construction is estimated to generate approximately 860.4 tons of solid waste. ([396,275 s.f. × 4.34 pounds per s.f.] ÷ 2,000 pounds per ton = 860 tons) (EPA, 2009, Table A-2).

CalGreen requires a minimum of 65% of all construction waste be diverted from landfills (by recycling, reusing, and other waste reduction strategies); therefore, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 301.1 tons of construction waste requiring landfill disposal (860 tons × 0.35 = 301 tons).

The Project’s construction phase is estimated to last for up to 190 working days; therefore, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 1.58 tons of solid waste per day (301 tons ÷ 190 days = 1.58 tons per day) requiring landfill during construction.

Non-recyclable construction waste generated by the Project would be disposed at the El Sobrante Landfill or Badlands Sanitary Landfill. As described above, these landfills receive well below their maximum permitted daily disposal volume; thus, the relatively minimal construction waste generated by the Project is not anticipated to cause the landfills to exceed their maximum permitted daily disposal volume. (Project construction waste would represent approximately 0.03% of the excess disposal capacity at the El Sobrante Landfill and approximately 0.08% of the excess disposal capacity at the Badlands Sanitary Landfill.) Furthermore, the El Sobrante Landfill and Badlands Sanitary Landfill are not expected to reach its total maximum permitted disposal capacities during the Project’s construction period. The El Sobrante Landfill and Badlands Sanitary Landfill have sufficient daily capacity to accept solid waste generated by the Project’s construction phase; therefore, impacts to landfill capacity associated with the Project’s near-term construction activities would be less than significant.

Operational Impact Analysis
Based on a daily waste generation factor of 1.42 pounds of waste per 100 square feet of industrial building area obtained from CalRecycle, long-term, on-going operation of the Project would generate approximately 2.81 tons of solid waste per day ([[1.42 pounds ÷ 100 s.f.] × 396,275 s.f. ] ÷ 2,000 pounds = 2.81 tons per day) (CalRecycle, 2019c). Pursuant to AB 939, at least 50 percent of the Project’s solid waste is required to be diverted from landfills; therefore, the Project would generate approximately 1.41 tons of solid waste per day requiring landfilling (2.81 tons per day × 50% = 1.41 tons per day).

Non-recyclable solid waste generated during long-term operation of the Project would be disposed at the El Sobrante Landfill and the Badlands Sanitary Landfill. As described above, these landfills receive well below their maximum permitted daily disposal volume; thus, waste generated by the Project’s operation is not anticipated to cause the landfills to exceed their maximum permitted daily disposal volume. (Project operational rate would represent approximately 0.03% of the daily excess disposal capacity at the El Sobrante Landfill and approximately 0.07% of the daily excess disposal capacity at the Badlands Sanitary Landfill.) Because the Project would generate a relatively small amount of solid waste per day as compared to the permitted daily capacities at the receiving landfills, impacts to the El Sobrante Landfill and Badlands Sanitary Landfill facilities during the Project’s long-term operational activities would be less than significant.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 78 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: The California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939), signed into law in 1989, established an integrated waste management system that focused on source reduction, recycling, composting, and land disposal of waste. In addition, the bill established a 50 percent waste reduction requirement for cities and counties by the year 2000, along with a process to ensure environmentally safe disposal of waste that could not be diverted. Per the requirements of the Integrated Waste Management Act, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted the County of Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP), which outlines the goals, policies, and programs the County and its cities implement to create an integrated and cost-effective waste management system that complies with the provisions of AB 939 and its diversion mandates. (RCDWR, 2020)
In order to assist the City of Moreno Valley and the County of Riverside in achieving the mandated goals of the Integrated Waste Management Act, the Project’s building user(s) would be required to work with future refuse haulers to develop and implement feasible waste reduction programs, including source reduction, recycling, and composting. Additionally, in accordance with the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Act of 1991 (Cal Pub Res. Code § 42911), the Project is required to provide adequate areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials where solid waste is collected. The collection areas are required to be shown on construction drawings and be in place before occupancy permits are issued. (CA Legislative Information, 2005) Additionally, in compliance with AB 341 (Mandatory Commercial Recycling Program), the future occupant(s) of the proposed Project would be required to arrange for recycling services, if the occupant generates four (4) or more cubic yards of solid waste per week (CA Legislative Information, 2011). The implementation of these mandatory requirements would reduce the amount of solid waste generated by the Project and diverted to landfills, which in turn will aid in the extension of the life of affected disposal sites. The Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable solid waste statutes and regulations; as such, impacts related to solid waste statutes and regulations would be less than significant.

Sources:

1. California Legislative Information – Assembly Bill 341 Solid Waste: Diversion, Approved October 5, 2011, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB341

2. California Legislative Information – Public Resources Code § 42911 – California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991, Effective January 1, 2005, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PRC&sectionNu m=42911

3. Eastern Municipal Water District – Sanitary Sewer System Planning & Design, Revised September 1, 2006,
https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/emwdsewer_system_design.pdf?1542760914

4. Eastern Municipal Water District – Water System Planning & Design, Revised July 2, 2007, https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/fileattachments/emwdwater_system_design.pdf?1542760903

5. Eastern Municipal Water District – Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, October 2016, https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/mvrwrffactsheet.pdf?1537294991

6. Riverside County Department of Waste Resources – Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, 2020, https://www.rcwaste.org/business/planning/ciwmp

7. CalRecycle – SWIS Site/Facility Details: El Sobrante Landfill. Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2280?siteID=2402. Accessed October 1, 2020

8. CalRecycle – Daily Landfilled Tonnage & Total Traffic By Site: El Sobrante, July 2020. (CalRecycle, 2020a)

9. CalRecycle – SWIS Site/Facility Details: Badlands Sanitary Landfill. Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2245?siteID=2367. Accessed October 1, 2020

10. CalRecycle – Daily Landfilled Tonnage & Total Traffic By Site: Badlands, July 2020.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 79 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines
or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Response: The Project site is not located in or near state responsibility areas (SRA) or lands within a very high fire hazard severity zone (CalFire, 2007); therefore, the Project would not exacerbate wildfire hazard risks or expose people or the environment to adverse environmental effects related to wildfires.

As such, no impact would occur.

Sources:

1. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection – Western Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, Adopted on November 7, 2007,
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs_map60.pdf
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
Response: All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre-historical resources were evaluated as part of this IS/MND. Throughout this IS/MND, where impacts were determined to be potentially significant, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce those impacts to less-than-significant levels. Accordingly, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this IS/MND, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment and impacts would be less than significant. b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current project, and the effects of probable
future projects.)?
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 80 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: As discussed throughout this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed Project has the potential to result in effects to the environment that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.

In all instances where the Project has the potential to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact to the environment, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce potential effects to less-thansignificant levels.

Aesthetics
New development on the Project site and in the surrounding area would change the existing character of the Project’s viewshed; however, all development in the immediate vicinity of the Project would be required to comply with the development regulations and design standards contained in the City’s Development Code, which would ensure that minimum standards related to visual character and quality are met to preclude adverse aesthetic effects (e.g., size, scale, building materials, lighting). Accordingly, the Project’s aesthetic impacts would not be cumulatively considerable.

Agriculture and Forestry Resources
The Project would have no impact on agricultural resources. Therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact under this topic.

Air Quality
Based on SCAQMD guidance, any direct exceedance of a regional or localized threshold also is considered to be a cumulatively-considerable effect, while air pollutant emissions below applicable regional and/or localized thresholds are not considered cumulatively considerable. As discussed in the preceding analysis, the Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional threshold for criteria pollutants during construction or operation of the Project. Therefore, Project-related construction and operation emissions are not considered cumulatively-considerable.

Biological Resources
The Project site does not support any sensitive plant or wildlife species; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively-considerable impact under these resources. Although the Project site is highly disturbed and fragmented from other open space areas under existing conditions, the site does contain quality habitat for nesting birds and contains habitat that could be used by the burrowing owl. Therefore, there is the potential that nesting birds and/or the burrowing owl could be present on the Project site prior to construction and there also is the potential that other development projects in the Riverside area could support bird nests and/or the burrowing owl. The Project’s potential impacts to nesting birds and the burrowing owl would be cumulatively considerable. MMs BR-1 and BR2 would reduce the Project’s cumulative effects to less-than-significant levels by ensuring that no direct take of nesting birds occurs during construction.

The Project would permanently impact habitat that is classified as: sensitive natural community, riparian/riverine habitat, and a State-protected wetland. Accordingly, the Project would contribute to a cumulatively-considerable impact under these resources. MM BR-3 would reduce the Project’s cumulative effects to less-than-significant levels by ensuring that these impacts would be fully compensated through the purchasing of habitat mitigation credits.

Cultural Resources
The Project site does not contain historic or prehistoric archaeological resources and mandatory compliance with State law would preclude impacts to human remains; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerably impact to these resources.

Energy
The Project’s construction and operation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary and would not obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. In addition, all cumulative projects would also be required to comply with the California Building Standards Code, which establishes standards for energy efficiency and “green” construction.

Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in a less-than-significant cumulative impact to energy.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 81 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Geology and Soils
Potential effects related to geology and soils are inherently site-specific; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact under this topic. Furthermore, all development proposals would be required to comply with applicable federal, State, and local regulations that are in place to preclude adverse geology and soils effects, including effects related to strong seismic ground shaking, fault rupture, soil erosion, and hazardous soil conditions (e.g., liquefaction, expansive soils, landslides).

Notwithstanding, there is remote potential that paleontological resources are buried beneath the surface of the Project site and could be impacted during construction. Other projects within region would similarly have the potential to impact unknown, subsurface paleontological resources during ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, the potential for development on the Project site to impact subsurface paleontological resource deposits is a cumulatively considerable impact. Application of MMs GEO-1 through GEO-4 would reduce the Project’s cumulative impacts to less-than-significant levels.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As described in the preceding analysis, global climate change (GCC) occurs as the result of global emissions of GHGs. An individual development project does not have the potential to result in direct and significant GCC-related effects in the absence of cumulative sources of GHGs. The CEQA Guidelines also emphasize that the effects of GHG emissions are cumulative, and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for cumulative impacts analysis (See CEQA Guidelines § 15130[f]).

Accordingly, the preceding analysis reflects a cumulative impact analysis of the GHG emissions related to the Project. As concluded under Response VIII(a) and (b), the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact related to GHG emissions.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potential effects related to hazards and hazardous materials are inherently site-specific; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact under this topic.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Construction and operation of the Project and other projects in the Santa Ana River watershed would have the potential to result in a cumulative water quality impact, including erosion and sedimentation.

However, in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, all development projects would be required to implement plans during construction and operation (e.g., SWPPP and WQMP) to minimize adverse effects to water quality, which would avoid a cumulatively considerable impact.

The Project and other projects in the Santa Ana River Basin would be required to comply with federal, State, and local regulations in order to preclude flood hazards both on- and off-site. Compliance with federal, State, and local regulations would require on-site areas to be protected, at a minimum, from flooding during peak storm events (i.e., 100-year storm) and that proposed development would not expose downstream properties to increased flooding risks during peak storm events. Accordingly, a cumulatively considerable effect related to flooding would not occur.

Land Use and Planning
The Project would not physically divide an established community, or conflict with applicable land use/planning documents; therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulativelyconsiderable impact related to land use and planning.

Mineral Resources
The Project would have no impact on mineral resources. Therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact under this topic.

Noise
Noise levels diminish rapidly with distance; therefore, for a development project to contribute to a noiserelated cumulative impact it must be located in close proximity to another development project or source of substantial noise. There are no construction projects in the immediate vicinity of the Project site that would overlap with Project-related construction activities. Accordingly, cumulatively-considerable impacts related to periodic noise and construction-related vibration would not occur. Under long-term F.1.b
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 82 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
operating conditions the Project would comply with the City of Moreno Valley noise ordinance and would not produce noticeable levels of vibration; therefore, cumulatively considerable impacts related to these issue areas would not occur. The analysis provided under Response XIII(a) demonstrates that the Project would not result in a cumulatively-considerable impact related to transportation noise under longterm conditions.

Population and Housing
The Project would not implement land uses that generate new residents and would not require the construction of replacement housing. Accordingly, the City has anticipated – and planned for – the growth that would occur on the Project site and there is no potential for the Project to result in an adverse, cumulatively considerable environmental effect related to population and housing.

Public Services
All development projects in the City of Moreno Valley, including the Project, would be required to pay development impact fees, a portion of which would be used by the City for the provision of public services, to offset the incremental increase in demand for fire protection and police protection services.

Furthermore, future development would generate an on-going stream of property tax revenue and sales tax revenue, which would provide funds that could be used by the City of Moreno Valley for the provision of fire and police protection services. The Project would not directly result in the introduction of new residents to the City and, therefore, would have no potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts to resident-serving public facilities such as schools, parks, libraries, and other public facilities or services.

Recreation
The Project would have no impact to recreation facilities. Therefore, there is no potential for the Project to contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact under this topic.

Transportation
The Project would not conflict with any City policies addressing the circulation network and would not generate substantial VMT. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to any cumulatively-considerable adverse transportation effects.

Tribal Cultural Resource
Development activities on the Project site would not impact any known tribal cultural resources.

However, there is the remote potential that such resources are buried beneath the surface of the Project site and could be impacted during construction. Other projects within region would similarly have the potential to impact unknown, subsurface tribal cultural resources during ground-disturbing activities.

Therefore, the potential for development on the Project site to impact subsurface tribal cultural resource deposits is a cumulatively considerable impact. Application of MMs TCR-1 though TCR-6 would reduce the Project’s cumulative impacts to less-than-significant levels.

Utilities and Service Systems
The Project would require water and wastewater infrastructure, as well as solid waste disposal for building operation. Development of public utility infrastructure is part of an extensive planning process involving utility providers and jurisdictions with discretionary review authority. The coordination process associated with the preparation of infrastructure plans is intended to ensure that adequate public utility services and resources are available to serve both individual development projects and cumulative growth in the region. Each individual development project is subject to review for utility capacity to avoid unanticipated interruptions in service or inadequate supplies. Coordination with the utility providers would allow for the provision of utility services to the Project and other developments. The Project and other planned projects are subject to connection and service fees to offset increased demand and assist in facility expansion and service improvements (at the time of need). Because of the utility planning and coordination activities described above, cumulatively considerable impacts to utilities and service systems would not occur.

Wildfire
The Project site is not located in a SRA or very high fire hazard area. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in no adverse impacts associated with wildfire.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe Project Page 83 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Response: The Project’s potential to result in environmental effects that could adversely affect human beings, either directly or indirectly, has been discussed throughout this IS/MND. As demonstrated by this analysis, construction and operation of the Project would not involve any activities that would result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Exhibit A to IS Resolution Initial Study - MND [Revision 1] (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Compass Danbe Centerpointe

AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
PREPARED BY:

Haseeb Qureshi
[email protected]
Alyssa Tamase
[email protected]
NOVEMBER 12, 2020
13661-02 AQ Report
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) F.1.c
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................I APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................II LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................II LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS........................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................1 ES.1 Summary of Findings..................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 Standard Regulatory Requirements.............................................................................................. 1 ES.3 Construction and Operational-Source Mitigation Measures........................................................ 2 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................4

1.1 Site Location.................................................................................................................................. 4

1.2 Project Description........................................................................................................................ 4 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING................................................................................................................8

2.1 South Coast Air Basin.................................................................................................................... 8

2.2 Regional Climate ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.3 Wind Patterns and Project Location ............................................................................................. 9

2.4 Criteria Pollutants....................................................................................................................... 10

2.5 Existing Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 17

2.6 Regional Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 20

2.7 Local Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 20

2.8 Regulatory Background............................................................................................................... 21

2.9 Regional Air Quality Improvement ............................................................................................. 25 3 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT ................................................................................................36

3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 36

3.2 Standards of Significance ............................................................................................................ 36

3.3 Models Employed To Analyze Air Quality................................................................................... 37

3.4 Construction Emissions............................................................................................................... 37

3.5 Operational Emissions ................................................................................................................ 40

3.6 Localized Significance.................................................................................................................. 45

3.7 Construction-Source Emissions LST Analysis.............................................................................. 49

3.8 Localized Significance – Long-Term Operational Activity ........................................................... 50

3.9 CO “Hot Spot” Analysis ............................................................................................................... 52

3.10 Air Quality Management Planning.............................................................................................. 54

3.11 Potential Impacts to Sensitive Receptors................................................................................... 56

3.12 Odors........................................................................................................................................... 58

3.13 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................................... 59 4 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................62 5 CERTIFICATIONS ......................................................................................................................66 F.1.c
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
ii

APPENDICES
APPENDIX 2.1: STATE/FEDERAL ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION (UNMITIGATED) EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.2: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONAL (PASSENGER CARS) EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.3: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONAL (TRUCKS) EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.4: EMFAC2017 EMISSION RATES
APPENDIX 3.5: SCAQMD BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE

LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP.............................................................................................................5 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN......................................................................................................................6 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND.......................................................................33 EXHIBIT 3-A: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ................................................................................48

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................1 TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS ....................................................................................................10 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2)....................................................................18 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2)....................................................................19 TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB .........................................20 TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2017-2019....................................21 TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND...............................................................................................................26 TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 27 TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1..28 TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 28 TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1.29 TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1...................................................30 TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)31 TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD) ...31 TABLE 3-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS ....................................................36 TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION DURATION.............................................................................................38 TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................39 TABLE 3-4: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITHOUT MITIGATION......................40 TABLE 3-5: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX.............................................................................................42 TABLE 3-6: TRUCK FLEET MIX............................................................................................................43 TABLE 3-7: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS– WITHOUT MITIGATION..........................44 TABLE 3-8: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS ...................................................49 TABLE 3-9: PROJECT LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION......................50 TABLE 3-10: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS...........................51 TABLE 3-11: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION............52 TABLE 3-12: CO MODEL RESULTS ......................................................................................................52 F.1.c
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
iii
TABLE 3-13: TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................54 TABLE 3-14: EAP TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................................................................................54 F.1.c
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
iv

LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
(1) Reference
µg/m3 Microgram per Cubic Meter
AB 2595 California Clean Air Act
AQ Air Quality
AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis
AQMD Air Quality Management District
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BC Black Carbon
Brief Brief of Amicus Curiae by the SCAQMD in the Friant Ranch Case
C2Cl4 Perchloroethylene
C2H4 Acetaldehyde
C4H6 1,3-butadiene
C6H6 Benzene
CAA Federal Clean Air Act
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA Guidelines 2019 California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines CH2O Formaldehyde
City City of Moreno Valley
CO Carbon Monoxide
COH Coefficient of Haze
COHb carboxyhemoglobin
Cr(VI) Chromium
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
v
CTP Clean Truck Program
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DRRP Diesel Risk Reduction Plan
EAP Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project
EC Elemental Carbon
EIR Environmental Impact Reports
EMFAC EMissions FACtor Model
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ETW Equivalent Test Weight
g/L Grams Per Liter
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GPA General Plan Amendment
GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating
H2S Hydrogen Sulfide
HDT Heavy Duty Trucks
HI Hazard Index
HHDT Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks
hp Horsepower
HRA Health Risk Assessment
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
lbs Pounds
lbs/day Pounds Per Day
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LST Localized Significance Threshold
LST Methodology Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology MARB/IPA March Air Reserve Base and Inland Port Airport MATES Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study
MDV Medium-Duty Vehicles
MICR Maximum Individual Cancer Risk
MM Mitigation Measures
N2 Nitrogen
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO Nitric Oxide
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOX Nitrogen Oxides
O2 Oxygen
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
vi
O3 Ozone
OBD-II On-Board Diagnostic
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Pb Lead
PCE Passenger Car Equivalents
PM10 Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less
PM2.5 Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less POLA Port of Los Angeles
POLB Port of Long Beach
ppm Parts Per Million
Project Compass Danbe Centerpointe
RECLAIM Regional Clean Air Incentives Market
RFG-2 Reformulated Gasoline Regulation
ROG Reactive Organic Gases
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy
Rule 403 Fugitive Dust
Rule 1113 Architectural Coating
SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
sf Square Feet
SIPs State Implementation Plans
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
SO4 Sulfates
SOX Sulfur Oxides
SRA Source Receptor Area
TAC Toxic Air Contaminant
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TA Alessandro Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis
TITLE I Non-Attainment Provisions
TITLE II Mobile Sources Provisions
TRU Transport Refrigeration Unit
UFP Ultra Fine Particles
UTRs Utility Tractors
C2H3Cl Vinyl Chloride
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
vii
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
VPH Vehicles Per Hour
ZC Zone Change
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
viii
This page intentionally left blank
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis are summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 3 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the 2019 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (1). Table ES1 shows the findings of significance for each potential air quality impact under CEQA before and after any required mitigation measures described below.

TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Regional Construction Emissions 3.4 Less Than Significant n/a Localized Construction Emissions 3.6 Less Than Significant n/a Regional Operational Emissions 3.5 Less Than Significant n/a Localized Operational Emissions 3.7 Less Than Significant n/a CO “Hot Spot” Analysis 3.8 Less Than Significant n/a
Air Quality Management Plan 3.9 Less Than Significant n/a Sensitive Receptors 3.10 Less Than Significant n/a
Odors 3.11 Less Than Significant n/a
Cumulative Impacts 3.12 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 STANDARD REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
There are numerous requirements that development projects must comply with by law, and that were put in place by federal, State, and local regulatory agencies for the improvement of air quality. The two most pertinent regulatory requirements that apply to the proposed Project and which are required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this Project are Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (2) F.1.c
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
2 and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (3). Because they are required by law, credit for Rule 403 and Rule 1113 have been taken in the analysis.

SCAQMD RULE 403
This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent and reduce fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human-made condition capable of generating fugitive dust and requires best available control measures to be applied to earth moving and grading activities.

SCAQMD RULE 1113
This rule serves to limit the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects in the SCAQMD must comply with the current VOC standards set in this rule.

ES.3 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL-SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURES The Project would not result in an exceedance of any regional or localized construction or operational-source emissions thresholds. As such, the Project would not result in any significant impacts and no MMs are required.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
3 This page intentionally left blank
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
4 1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the air quality impact analysis (AQIA) prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed Compass Danbe Centerpointe (Project). The purpose of this AQIA is to evaluate the potential impacts to air quality associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project and recommend measures to mitigate impacts considered potentially significant in comparison to thresholds established by the SCAQMD.

1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed project is located south of Alessandro Boulevard on either side of Chagall Court in the City of Moreno Valley as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport (MARB/IPA) is located approximately 0.9 miles south of the Project site. The Project site is bordered to the west by vacant land, to the east by vacant land, to the north by commercial and residential uses, and to the south are existing industrial buildings.

This proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and a Zone Change (ZC). The site is currently designated as Commercial in the City’s General Plan, which would require a land use and zoning change to Light Industrial use. The proposed changes are consistent with the zones to the west, south and east of the subject site and adjacent properties. The amendment is in keeping with the uses surrounding the project site.

1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Exhibit 1-B illustrates a preliminary site plan for the Project. The Project is anticipated to be developed within a single phase with an anticipated opening year of 2022. The proposed Project consists of the following uses:
• Building 1: 206,665 square feet (sf) of warehousing (70% of total building sf) and 88,571 sf of highcube cold storage warehouse use (30% of total building sf) for a total of 295,236 sf for Building 1 • Building 2: 70,876 sf of warehousing (70% of total building sf) and 30,376 sf of high-cube cold storage warehouse use (30% of total building sf) for a total of 101,252 sf for Building 2 This analysis includes a conservative assumption of on-site Project-related emission sources for potential future tenants, including architectural coatings, consumer products, landscape maintenance equipment, emissions associated with natural gas and electricity, and mobile source emissions. This analysis is intended to describe air impacts associated with the expected operational activities at the Project site. This report assumes the Project will operate 24-hours daily for seven days per week. At the time this air quality impact analysis was prepared, the future tenants of the proposed Project were unknown however any tenant would operate consistent with a high-cube warehouse.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
5 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
6 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20- Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
7 This page intentionally left blank
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
8 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING
This section provides an overview of the existing air quality conditions in the Project area and region.

2.1 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) within the jurisdiction of SCAQMD (4). The SCAQMD was created by the 1977 Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act, which merged four county air pollution control bodies into one regional district. Under the Act, the SCAQMD is responsible for bringing air quality in areas under its jurisdiction into conformity with federal and state air quality standards. As previously stated, the Project site is located within the SCAB, a 6,745-square mile subregion of the SCAQMD, which includes portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, and all of Orange County.

The SCAB is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The Los Angeles County portion of the Mojave Desert Air Basin is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the south and west, the Los Angeles/Kern County border to the north, and the Los Angeles/San Bernardino County border to the east. The Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin is bounded by the San Jacinto Mountains in the west and spans eastward up to the Palo Verde Valley.

2.2 REGIONAL CLIMATE
The regional climate has a substantial influence on air quality in the SCAB. In addition, the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine influence the air quality.

The annual average temperatures throughout the SCAB vary from the low to middle 60s degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Due to a decreased marine influence, the eastern portion of the SCAB shows greater variability in average annual minimum and maximum temperatures. January is the coldest month throughout the SCAB, with average minimum temperatures of 47°F in downtown Los Angeles and 36°F in San Bernardino. All portions of the SCAB have recorded maximum temperatures above 100°F.

Although the climate of the SCAB can be characterized as semi-arid, the air near the land surface is quite moist on most days because of the presence of a marine layer. This shallow layer of sea air is an important modifier of SCAB climate. Humidity restricts visibility in the SCAB, and the conversion of sulfur dioxide (SO2) to sulfates(SO4) is heightened in air with high relative humidity.

The marine layer provides an environment for that conversion process, especially during the spring and summer months. The annual average relative humidity within the SCAB is 71% along the coast and 59% inland. Since the ocean effect is dominant, periods of heavy early morning fog are frequent and low stratus clouds are a characteristic feature. These effects decrease with distance from the coast.

More than 90% of the SCAB’s rainfall occurs from November through April. The annual average rainfall varies from approximately nine inches in Riverside to fourteen inches in downtown Los F.1.c
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
9 Angeles. Monthly and yearly rainfall totals are extremely variable. Summer rainfall usually consists of widely scattered thunderstorms near the coast and slightly heavier shower activity in the eastern portion of the SCAB with frequency being higher near the coast.

Due to its generally clear weather, about three-quarters of available sunshine is received in the SCAB. The remaining one-quarter is absorbed by clouds. The ultraviolet portion of this abundant radiation is a key factor in photochemical reactions. On the shortest day of the year there are approximately 10 hours of possible sunshine, and on the longest day of the year there are approximately 14½ hours of possible sunshine.

The importance of wind to air pollution is considerable. The direction and speed of the wind determines the horizontal dispersion and transport of the air pollutants. During the late autumn to early spring rainy season, the SCAB is subjected to wind flows associated with the traveling storms moving through the region from the northwest. This period also brings five to ten periods of strong, dry offshore winds, locally termed “Santa Anas” each year. During the dry season, which coincides with the months of maximum photochemical smog concentrations, the wind flow is bimodal, typified by a daytime onshore sea breeze and a nighttime offshore drainage wind. Summer wind flows are created by the pressure differences between the relatively cold ocean and the unevenly heated and cooled land surfaces that modify the general northwesterly wind circulation over southern California. Nighttime drainage begins with the radiational cooling of the mountain slopes. Heavy, cool air descends the slopes and flows through the mountain passes and canyons as it follows the lowering terrain toward the ocean. Another characteristic wind regime in the SCAB is the “Catalina Eddy,” a low level cyclonic (counterclockwise) flow centered over Santa Catalina Island which results in an offshore flow to the southwest. On most spring and summer days, some indication of an eddy is apparent in coastal sections.

In the SCAB, there are two distinct temperature inversion structures that control vertical mixing of air pollution. During the summer, warm high-pressure descending (subsiding) air is undercut by a shallow layer of cool marine air. The boundary between these two layers of air is a persistent marine subsidence/inversion. This boundary prevents vertical mixing which effectively acts as an impervious lid to pollutants over the entire SCAB. The mixing height for the inversion structure is normally situated 1,000 to 1,500 feet above mean sea level.

A second inversion-type forms in conjunction with the drainage of cool air off the surrounding mountains at night followed by the seaward drift of this pool of cool air. The top of this layer forms a sharp boundary with the warmer air aloft and creates nocturnal radiation inversions.

These inversions occur primarily in the winter when nights are longer and onshore flow is weakest. They are typically only a few hundred feet above mean sea level. These inversions effectively trap pollutants, such as Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and carbon monoxide (CO) from vehicles, as the pool of cool air drifts seaward. Winter is therefore a period of high levels of primary pollutants along the coastline.

2.3 WIND PATTERNS AND PROJECT LOCATION
The distinctive climate of the Project area and the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographical location. The SCAB is located in a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and F.1.c
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
10 low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean in the southwest quadrant with high mountains forming the remainder of the perimeter.

Wind patterns across the south coastal region are characterized by westerly and southwesterly onshore winds during the day and easterly or northeasterly breezes at night. Winds are characteristically light although the speed is somewhat greater during the dry summer months than during the rainy winter season.

2.4 CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Criteria pollutants are pollutants that are regulated through the development of human health based and/or environmentally based criteria for setting permissible levels. Criteria pollutants, their typical sources, and health effects are identified below (5):

TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects
CO CO is a colorless, odorless gas
produced by the incomplete
combustion of carbon-containing
fuels, such as gasoline or wood.

CO concentrations tend to be the
highest during the winter
morning, when little to no wind
and surface-based inversions trap
the pollutant at ground levels.

Because CO is emitted directly
from internal combustion
engines, unlike ozone (O3), motor
vehicles operating at slow speeds
are the primary source of CO in
the SCAB. The highest ambient
CO concentrations are generally
found near congested
transportation corridors and
intersections.

Any source that
burns fuel such as
automobiles, trucks,
heavy construction
equipment, farming
equipment and
residential heating.

Individuals with a deficient
blood supply to the heart are
the most susceptible to the
adverse effects of CO
exposure. The effects
observed include earlier
onset of chest pain with
exercise, and
electrocardiograph changes
indicative of decreased
oxygen (O2) supply to the
heart. Inhaled CO has no
direct toxic effect on the
lungs but exerts its effect on
tissues by interfering with O2
transport and competing with
O2 to combine with
hemoglobin present in the
blood to form
carboxyhemoglobin (COHb).

Hence, conditions with an
increased demand for O2
supply can be adversely
affected by exposure to CO.

Individuals most at risk
include fetuses, patients with
diseases involving heart and
blood vessels, and patients
with chronic hypoxemia (O2
deficiency) as seen at high
altitudes.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
11 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects SO2 SO2 is a colorless, extremely
irritating gas or liquid. It enters
the atmosphere as a pollutant
mainly as a result of burning high
sulfur-content fuel oils and coal
and from chemical processes
occurring at chemical plants and
refineries. When SO2 oxidizes in
the atmosphere, it forms SO4.

Collectively, these pollutants are
referred to as sulfur oxides (SOX).

Coal or oil burning
power plants and
industries,
refineries, diesel
engines
A few minutes of exposure to
low levels of SO2 can result in
airway constriction in some
asthmatics, all of whom are
sensitive to its effects. In
asthmatics, increase in
resistance to air flow, as well
as reduction in breathing
capacity leading to severe
breathing difficulties, are
observed after acute
exposure to SO2. In contrast,
healthy individuals do not
exhibit similar acute
responses even after
exposure to higher
concentrations of SO2.

Animal studies suggest that
despite SO2 being a
respiratory irritant, it does
not cause substantial lung
injury at ambient
concentrations. However,
very high levels of exposure
can cause lung edema (fluid
accumulation), lung tissue
damage, and sloughing off of
cells lining the respiratory
tract.

Some population-based
studies indicate that the
mortality and morbidity
effects associated with fine
particles show a similar
association with ambient SO2
levels. In these studies,
efforts to separate the effects
of SO2 from those of fine
particles have not been
successful. It is not clear
whether the two pollutants
act synergistically, or one
pollutant alone is the
predominant factor.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
12 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects NOX NOX consist of nitric oxide (NO),
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and
nitrous oxide (N2O) and are
formed when nitrogen (N2)
combines with O2. Their lifespan
in the atmosphere ranges from
one to seven days for nitric oxide
and nitrogen dioxide, to 170
years for nitrous oxide. NOX is
typically created during
combustion processes and are
major contributors to smog
formation and acid deposition.

NO2 is a criteria air pollutant and
may result in numerous adverse
health effects; it absorbs blue
light, resulting in a brownish-red
cast to the atmosphere and
reduced visibility. Of the seven
types of nitrogen oxide
compounds, NO2 is the most
abundant in the atmosphere. As
ambient concentrations of NO2
are related to traffic density,
commuters in heavy traffic may
be exposed to higher
concentrations of NO2 than those
indicated by regional monitoring
station.

Any source that
burns fuel such as
automobiles, trucks,
heavy construction
equipment, farming
equipment and
residential heating.

Population-based studies
suggest that an increase in
acute respiratory illness,
including infections and
respiratory symptoms in
children (not infants), is
associated with long-term
exposure to NO2 at levels
found in homes with gas
stoves, which are higher than
ambient levels found in
Southern California. Increase
in resistance to air flow and
airway contraction is
observed after short-term
exposure to NO2 in healthy
subjects. Larger decreases in
lung functions are observed
in individuals with asthma or
chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (e.g.,
chronic bronchitis,
emphysema) than in healthy
individuals, indicating a
greater susceptibility of these
sub-groups.

In animals, exposure to levels
of NO2 considerably higher
than ambient concentrations
result in increased
susceptibility to infections,
possibly due to the observed
changes in cells involved in
maintaining immune
functions. The severity of
lung tissue damage
associated with high levels of
O3 exposure increases when
animals are exposed to a
combination of O3 and NO2.

O3 O3 is a highly reactive and
unstable gas that is formed when
VOCs and NOX, both byproducts
of internal combustion engine
exhaust, undergo slow
photochemical reactions in the
presence of sunlight. O3
concentrations are generally
highest during the summer
Formed when
reactive organic
gases (ROG)
and NOX
react in the
presence of
sunlight. ROG
sources
include any source
Individuals exercising
outdoors, children, and
people with preexisting lung
disease, such as asthma and
chronic pulmonary lung
disease, are considered to be
the most susceptible subgroups for O3 effects. Shortterm exposure (lasting for a F.1.c
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
13 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects months when direct sunlight,
light wind, and warm
temperature conditions are
favorable to the formation of this
pollutant.
that burns fuels,
(e.g., gasoline,
natural gas, wood,
oil) solvents,
petroleum
processing and
storage and
pesticides.
few hours) to O3 at levels
typically observed in
Southern California can result
in breathing pattern changes,
reduction of breathing
capacity, increased
susceptibility to infections,
inflammation of the lung
tissue, and some
immunological changes.

Elevated O3 levels are
associated with increased
school absences. In recent
years, a correlation between
elevated ambient O3 levels
and increases in daily hospital
admission rates, as well as
mortality, has also been
reported. An increased risk
for asthma has been found in
children who participate in
multiple outdoor sports and
live in communities with high
O3 levels.

O3 exposure under exercising
conditions is known to
increase the severity of the
responses described above.

Animal studies suggest that
exposure to a combination of
pollutants that includes O3
may be more toxic than
exposure to O3 alone.

Although lung volume and
resistance changes observed
after a single exposure
diminish with repeated
exposures, biochemical and
cellular changes appear to
persist, which can lead to
subsequent lung structural
changes.

Particulate Matter PM10: A major air pollutant
consisting of tiny solid or liquid
particles of soot, dust, smoke,
fumes, and aerosols. Particulate
matter pollution is a major cause
of reduce visibility (haze) which is
caused by the scattering of light
Sources of PM10
include road dust,
windblown dust and
construction. Also
formed from other
pollutants (acid
rain, NOX, SOX,
A consistent correlation
between elevated ambient
fine particulate matter (PM10
and PM2.5) levels and an
increase in mortality rates,
respiratory infections,
number and severity of
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
14 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects and consequently the significant
reduction air clarity. The size of
the particles (10 microns or
smaller, about 0.0004 inches or
less) allows them to easily enter
the lungs where they may be
deposited, resulting in adverse
health effects. Additionally, it
should be noted that PM10 is
considered a criteria air
pollutant.

PM2.5: A similar air pollutant to
PM10 consisting of tiny solid or
liquid particles which are 2.5
microns or smaller (which is often
referred to as fine particles).

These particles are formed in the
atmosphere from primary
gaseous emissions that include
SO4 formed from SO2 release
from power plants and industrial
facilities and nitrates that are
formed from NOX release from
power plants, automobiles and
other types of combustion
sources. The chemical
composition of fine particles
highly depends on location, time
of year, and weather conditions.

PM2.5 is a criteria air pollutant.
organics).

Incomplete
combustion of any
fuel.

PM2.5 comes from
fuel combustion in
motor vehicles,
equipment and
industrial sources,
residential and
agricultural
burning. Also
formed from
reaction of other
pollutants (acid
rain, NOX, SOX,
organics).
asthma attacks and the
number of hospital
admissions has been
observed in different parts of
the United States and various
areas around the world. In
recent years, some studies
have reported an association
between long-term exposure
to air pollution dominated by
fine particles and increased
mortality, reduction in
lifespan, and an increased
mortality from lung cancer.

Daily fluctuations in PM2.5
concentration levels have
also been related to hospital
admissions for acute
respiratory conditions in
children, to school and
kindergarten absences, to a
decrease in respiratory lung
volumes in normal children,
and to increased medication
use in children and adults
with asthma. Recent studies
show lung function growth in
children is reduced with long
term exposure to particulate
matter.

The elderly, people with preexisting respiratory or
cardiovascular disease, and
children appear to be more
susceptible to the effects of
high levels of PM10 and PM2.5.

VOC VOCs are hydrocarbon
compounds (any compound
containing various combinations
of hydrogen and carbon atoms)
that exist in the ambient air.

VOCs contribute to the formation
of smog through atmospheric
photochemical reactions and/or
may be toxic. Compounds of
carbon (also known as organic
compounds) have different levels
of reactivity; that is, they do not
react at the same speed or do not
Organic chemicals
are widely used as
ingredients in
household
products. Paints,
varnishes and wax
all contain organic
solvents, as do
many cleaning,
disinfecting,
cosmetic,
degreasing and
hobby products.

Breathing VOCs can irritate
the eyes, nose and throat,
can cause difficulty breathing
and nausea, and can damage
the central nervous system as
well as other organs. Some
VOCs can cause cancer. Not
all VOCs have all these health
effects, though many have
several.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
15 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects form O3 to the same extent when
exposed to photochemical
processes. VOCs often have an
odor, and some examples include
gasoline, alcohol, and the
solvents used in paints.

Exceptions to the VOC
designation include CO, carbon
dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic
carbides or carbonates, and
ammonium carbonate. VOCs are
a criteria pollutant since they are
a precursor to O3, which is a
criteria pollutant. The terms VOC
and ROG (see below)
interchangeably.

Fuels are made up
of organic
chemicals. All of
these products can
release organic
compounds while
you are using them,
and, to some
degree, when they
are stored.

ROG Similar to VOC, ROGs are also
precursors in forming O3 and
consist of compounds containing
methane, ethane, propane,
butane, and longer chain
hydrocarbons, which are typically
the result of some type of
combustion/decomposition
process. Smog is formed when
ROG and NOX react in the
presence of sunlight. ROGs are a
criteria pollutant since they are a
precursor to O3, which is a
criteria pollutant. The terms ROG
and VOC (see previous)
interchangeably.

Sources similar to
VOCs.

Health effects similar to
VOCs.

Lead (Pb) Pb is a heavy metal that is highly
persistent in the environment
and is considered a criteria
pollutant. In the past, the primary
source of Pb in the air was
emissions from vehicles burning
leaded gasoline. The major
sources of Pb emissions are ore
and metals processing,
particularly Pb smelters, and
piston-engine aircraft operating
on leaded aviation gasoline.

Other stationary sources include
waste incinerators, utilities, and
lead-acid battery manufacturers.

It should be noted that the
Project does not include
Metal smelters,
resource recovery,
leaded gasoline,
deterioration of Pb
paint.

Fetuses, infants, and children
are more sensitive than
others to the adverse effects
of Pb exposure. Exposure to
low levels of Pb can adversely
affect the development and
function of the central
nervous system, leading to
learning disorders,
distractibility, inability to
follow simple commands, and
lower intelligence quotient. In
adults, increased Pb levels are
associated with increased
blood pressure.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
16 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects operational activities such as
metal processing or Pb acid
battery manufacturing. As such,
the Project is not anticipated to
generate a quantifiable amount
of Pb emissions.

Pb poisoning can cause
anemia, lethargy, seizures,
and death; although it
appears that there are no
direct effects of Pb on the
respiratory system. Pb can be
stored in the bone from early
age environmental exposure,
and elevated blood Pb levels
can occur due to breakdown
of bone tissue during
pregnancy, hyperthyroidism
(increased secretion of
hormones from the thyroid
gland) and osteoporosis
(breakdown of bony tissue).

Fetuses and breast-fed babies
can be exposed to higher
levels of Pb because of
previous environmental Pb
exposure of their mothers.

Odor Odor means the perception
experienced by a person when
one or more chemical substances
in the air come into contact with
the human olfactory nerves (6).

Odors can come
from many sources
including animals,
human activities,
industry, natures,
and vehicles.

Offensive odors can
potentially affect human
health in several ways. First,
odorant compounds can
irritate the eye, nose, and
throat, which can reduce
respiratory volume. Second,
studies have shown that the
VOCs that cause odors can
stimulate sensory nerves to
cause neurochemical changes
that might influence health,
for instance, by
compromising the immune
system. Finally, unpleasant
odors can trigger memories
or attitudes linked to
unpleasant odors, causing
cognitive and emotional
effects such as stress.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
17 2.5 EXISTING AIRQUALITY
Existing air quality is measured at established SCAQMD air quality monitoring stations. Monitored air quality is evaluated in the context of ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality that are considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) currently in effect are shown in Table 2-2 (7).

The determination of whether a region’s air quality is healthful or unhealthful is determined by comparing contaminant levels in ambient air samples to the state and federal standards. At the time of this AQIA, the most recent state and federal standards were updated by CARB on May 4, 2016 and are presented in Table 2-2. The air quality in a region is considered to be in attainment by the state if the measured ambient air pollutant levels for O3, CO, SO2 (1 and 24 hour), NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 do not exceed standards. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. It should be noted that the three-year period is presented for informational purposes and is not the basis for how the State assigns attainment status. Attainment status for a pollutant means that the SCAQMD meets the standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the California EPA (CalEPA). Conversely, nonattainment means that an area has monitored air quality that does not meet the NAAQS or CAAQS standards. In order to improve air quality in nonattainment areas, CARB has implemented a State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP outlines the measures that the state will take to improve air quality. Once nonattainment areas meet the standards and additional redesignation requirements, the EPA will designate the area as a maintenance area (8).

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
18 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2)
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
19 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2)
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
20 2.6 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY
Air pollution contributes to a wide variety of adverse health effects. The EPA has established NAAQS for six of the most common air pollutants: CO, Pb, O3, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), NO2, and SO2 which are known as criteria pollutants. The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 37 permanent monitoring stations and 5 single-pollutant source Pb air monitoring sites throughout the air district (9). On February 21, 2019, CARB posted the 2018 amendments to the state and national area designations. See Table 2-3 for attainment designations for the SCAB (10). Appendix 2.1 provides geographic representation of the state and federal attainment status for applicable criteria pollutants within the SCAB.

TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB Criteria Pollutant State Designation Federal Designation O3 – 1-hour standard Nonattainment --
O3 – 8-hour standard Nonattainment Nonattainment
PM10 Nonattainment Attainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
CO Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
NO2 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
SO2 Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Pb1 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
Note: See Appendix 2.1 for a detailed map of State/National Area Designations within the SCAB “-“ = The national 1-hour O3 standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005.

2.7 LOCAL AIR QUALITY
The SCAQMD has designated general forecast areas and air monitoring areas (referred to as Source Receptor Areas [SRA]) throughout the district in order to provide Southern California residents about the air quality conditions. The Project site is located within the Perris Valley area (SRA 24). The Perris Valley monitoring station is located approximately 8.5 miles southeast of the Project site and reports air quality statistics for O3 and PM10. As the Perris Valley monitoring station does not include statistics for CO, NO2, and PM2.5, the next nearest station will be used.

The Metropolitan Riverside County (SRA 23) monitoring station, located approximately 10.7 miles northwest of the Project, is the next nearest monitoring stations that reports air quality statistics for CO, NO2, and PM2.5. It should be noted that the Metropolitan Riverside County monitoring station was utilized in lieu of the Perris Valley monitoring station only in instances where data was not available.

The most recent three (3) years of data available is shown on Table 2-4 and identifies the number of days ambient air quality standards were exceeded for the study area, which is considered to be representative of the local air quality at the Project site. Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 1 The Federal nonattainment designation for lead is only applicable towards the Los Angeles County portion of the SCAB.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
21 for 2017 through 2019 was obtained from the SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables (11). Additionally, data for SO2 has been omitted as attainment is regularly met in the SCAB and few monitoring stations measure SO2 concentrations.

TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2017-2019 Pollutant Standard
Year
2017 2018 2019
O3
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.120 0.117 0.118 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.105 0.103 0.095 Number of Days Exceeding State 1-Hour Standard > 0.09 ppm 33 31 26 Number of Days Exceeding State/Federal 8-Hour Standard > 0.070 ppm 80 67 64 CO
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 35 ppm 1.9 2.2 1.5 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration > 20 ppm 1.7 2.0 1.2 NO2
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 0.100 ppm 0.063 0.055 0.056 Annual Federal Standard Design Value 0.015 0.014 0.014
PM10
Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 150 µg/m3 75 64 97 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) 32.2 29.7 25.3
Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 150 µg/m3 0 0 0 Number of Days Exceeding State 24-Hour Standard > 50 µg/m3 11 3 4 PM2.5
Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 35 µg/m3 50.30 50.70 46.70 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) > 12 µg/m3 12.18 12.41 11.13 Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 35 µg/m3 6 2 4 ppm= Parts Per Million
Source: Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 was obtained from SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables.

2.8 REGULATORY BACKGROUND

2.8.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
The EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the NAAQS for O3, CO, NOX, SO2, PM10, and Pb (12). The EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of CARB.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
22 The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance (13). The CAA also mandates that states submit and implement SIPs for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met.

The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the Project site include Title I (Non-Attainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions) (14) (15). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants O3, NO2, SO2, PM10, CO, PM2.5, and Pb. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for O3 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2.5. Table 2-3 (previously presented) provides the NAAQS within the SCAB.

Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and NOX. NOX is a collective term that includes all forms of NOX which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process.

2.8.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS
CARB
CARB, which became part of the CalEPA in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB 2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. AB 2595 mandates achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. CARB established the CAAQS for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, establishes standards for SO4, visibility, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and vinyl chloride (C2H3Cl).

However, at this time, H2S and C2H3Cl are not measured at any monitoring stations in the SCAB because they are not considered to be a regional air quality problem. Generally, the CAAQS are more stringent than the NAAQS (16) (12).

Local air quality management districts, such as the SCAQMD, regulate air emissions from stationary sources such as commercial and industrial facilities. All air pollution control districts have been formally designated as attainment or non-attainment for each CAAQS.

Serious non-attainment areas are required to prepare Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP) that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include:
• Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; F.1.c
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
23 • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g. motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development); • A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions;
• Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a 5% or more annual reduction in emissions or 15% or more in a period of three years for ROGs, NOX, CO and PM10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than 5% per year under certain circumstances.

TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.

The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission.

CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2019 California Green Building Code Standards that became effective January 1, 2020.

Local jurisdictions are permitted to adopt more stringent requirements, as state law provides methods for local enhancements. CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction waste and demolition ordinances and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they establish a minimum 65% diversion requirement.

The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction waste and demolition recycling infrastructure. The State Building Code provides the minimum standard that buildings must meet in order to be certified for occupancy, which is generally enforced by the local building official.

Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the California Energy Commission (CEC) and became effective on January 1, 2020.

The 2019 Title 24 standards will result in less energy use, thereby reducing air pollutant emissions associated with energy consumption in the SCAB and across the State of California. For example, the 2019 Title 24 standards require solar photovoltaic systems for new homes, establish requirements for newly constructed healthcare facilities, encourage demand responsive technologies for residential buildings, and update indoor and outdoor lighting requirements for nonresidential buildings.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
24 The CEC anticipates that single-family homes built with the 2019 standards will use approximately 7% less energy compared to the residential homes built under the 2016 standards. Additionally, after implementation of solar photovoltaic systems, homes built under the 2019 standards will use about 53% less energy than homes built under the 2016 standards. Nonresidential buildings (such as the Project) will use approximately 30% less energy due to lighting upgrade requirements (18).

Because the Project will be constructed after January 1, 2020, the 2019 CALGreen standards are applicable to the Project and require, among other items (19):
• Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack (5.106.4.1.1). • Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenantoccupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2). • Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of lowemitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2). • Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of EV supply equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). • Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8) • Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section • 5.408.1.1. 5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1). • Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed (5.408.3). • Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage and collection of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive (5.410.1). • Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed 1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed 0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor- mounted or other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2).

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
25 o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2). o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi (5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5).
• Outdoor portable water use in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient (MWELO), whichever is more stringent (5.304.1). • Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000 gallons per day (5.303.1.1 and

5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water use in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.

Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3).
• Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project requirements (5.410.2).

2.8.3 AQMP
Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMP to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards (17). AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. A detailed discussion on the AQMP and Project consistency with the AQMP is provided in Section 3.10.

2.9 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
The Project is within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. In 1976, California adopted the Lewis Air Quality Management Act which created SCAQMD from a voluntary association of air pollution control districts in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The geographic area of which SCAQMD consists is known as the SCAB. SCAQMD develops comprehensive plans and regulatory programs for the region to attain federal standards by dates specified in federal law. The agency is also responsible for meeting state standards by the earliest date achievable, using reasonably available control measures.

SCAQMD rule development through the 1970s and 1980s resulted in dramatic improvement in SCAB air quality. Nearly all control programs developed through the early 1990s relied on (i) the F.1.c
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
26 development and application of cleaner technology; (ii) add-on emission controls, and (iii) uniform CEQA review throughout the SCAB. Industrial emission sources have been significantly reduced by this approach and vehicular emissions have been reduced by technologies implemented at the state level by CARB.

As discussed above, the SCAQMD is the lead agency charged with regulating air quality emission reductions for the entire SCAB. SCAQMD created AQMPs which represent a regional blueprint for achieving healthful air on behalf of the 16 million residents of the SCAB. The 2012 AQMP states, “the remarkable historical improvement in air quality since the 1970’s is the direct result of Southern California’s comprehensive, multiyear strategy of reducing air pollution from all sources as outlined in its AQMPs,” (18).

Emissions of O3, NOX, VOC, and CO have been decreasing in the SCAB since 1975 and are projected to continue to decrease through 2020 (19). These decreases result primarily from motor vehicle controls and reductions in evaporative emissions. Although vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the SCAB continue to increase, NOX and VOC levels are decreasing because of the mandated controls on motor vehicles and the replacement of older polluting vehicles with loweremitting vehicles. NOX emissions from electric utilities have also decreased due to use of cleaner fuels and renewable energy. O3 contour maps show that the number of days exceeding the 8- hour NAAQS has generally decreased between 1980 and 2019. For 2019, there was an overall decrease in exceedance days compared with the 1980 period. However, as shown on Table 2-5, O3 levels have increased in the past three years due to higher temperatures and stagnant weather conditions. Notwithstanding, O3 levels in the SCAB have decreased substantially over the last 30 years with the current maximum measured concentrations being approximately one-third of concentrations within the late 70’s (20).

TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND
Source: 2020 SCAQMD, Historical O3 Air Quality Trends (1976-2018) 0 25
50 75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Basin Days Exceeding
YEAR
1-Hour Stage 1 Episode
1-Hour Health Advisory
1979 1-Hour NAAQS
1997 8-Hour NAAQS
2008 8-Hour NAAQS
2015 8-Hour NAAQS
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
27 The overall trends of PM10 and PM2.5 levels in the air (not emissions) show an overall improvement since 1975. Direct emissions of PM10 have remained somewhat constant in the SCAB and direct emissions of PM2.5 have decreased slightly since 1975. Area wide sources (fugitive dust from roads, dust from construction and demolition, and other sources) contribute the greatest amount of direct particulate matter emissions.

As with other pollutants, the most recent PM10 statistics show an overall improvement as illustrated in Tables 2-6 and 2-7. During the period for which data are available, the 24-hour national annual average concentration for PM10 decreased by approximately 48%, from 103.7 microgram per cubic meter (µg/m³) in 1988 to 53.5 µg/m³ in 2018 (21). Although the values are below the federal standard, it should be noted that there are days within the year where the concentrations will exceed the threshold. The 24-hour state annual average for emissions for PM10, have decreased by approximately 53% since 1988 (21). Although data in the late 1990’s show some variability, this is probably due to the advances in meteorological science rather than a change in emissions. Similar to the ambient concentrations, the calculated number of days above the 24-hour PM10 standards has also shown an overall drop.

TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2018) 1 Some year have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
28 TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2018) 1 Some year have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

Tables 2-8 and 2-9 shows the most recent 24-hour average PM2.5 concentrations in the SCAB from 1999 through 2018. Overall, the national and state annual average concentrations have decreased by almost 52% and 33% respectively (21). It should be noted that the SCAB is currently designated as nonattainment for the state and federal PM2.5 standards.

TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 Some year have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
29 TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 Some year have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

While the 2012 AQMP PM10 attainment demonstration and the 2015 associated supplemental SIP submission indicated that attainment of the 24-hour standard was predicted to occur by the end of 2015, it could not anticipate the effect of the ongoing drought on the measured PM2.5.

The 2006 to 2010 base period used for the 2012 attainment demonstration had near-normal rainfall. While the trend of PM2.5-equivalent emission reductions continued through 2015, the severe drought conditions contributed to the PM2.5 increases observed after 2012. As a result of the disrupted progress toward attainment of the federal 24-hour PM2.5 standard, SCAQMD submitted a request and the EPA approved, in January 2016, a “bump up” to the nonattainment classification from “moderate” to “serious,” with a new attainment deadline as soon as practicable, but not beyond December 31, 2019. As of March 14, 2019, the EPA approved portions of a SIP revision submitted by California to address CAA requirements for the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 NAAQS in the Los Angeles-SCAB Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area. The EPA also approved 2017 and 2019 motor vehicle emissions budgets for transportation conformity purposes and inter-pollutant trading ratios for use in transportation conformity analyses (22).

In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as, explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (23). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS) and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories (17).

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
30 The 2022 AQMP is currently being developed by SCAQMD to address the EPA’s strengthened ozone standard. Development of the 2022 AQMP is in its early stages and no formal timeline for completion and adoption is currently known.

The most recent CO concentrations in the SCAB are shown in Table 2-10 (21). CO concentrations in the SCAB have decreased markedly — a total decrease of more about 80% in the peak 8-hour concentration from 1986 to 2012. It should be noted 2012 is the most recent year where 8-hour CO averages and related statistics are available in the SCAB. The number of exceedance days has also declined. The entire SCAB is now designated as attainment for both the state and national CO standards. Ongoing reductions from motor vehicle control programs should continue the downward trend in ambient CO concentrations.

TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 8-Hour Averages (1999-2018) 1 The most recent year where 8-hour concentration data is available is 2012.

Part of the control process of the SCAQMD’s duty to greatly improve the air quality in the SCAB is the uniform CEQA review procedures required by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) (1993 CEQA Handbook) (24). The single threshold of significance used to assess Project direct and cumulative impacts has in fact “worked” as evidenced by the track record of the air quality in the SCAB dramatically improving over the course of the past decades. As stated by the SCAQMD, the District’s thresholds of significance are based on factual and scientific data and are therefore appropriate thresholds of significance to use for this Project.

The most recent NO2 data for the SCAB is shown in Tables 2-11 and 2-12 (21). Over the last 50 years, NO2 values have decreased significantly; the peak 1-hour national and state averages for 2018 is approximately 82% lower than what it was during 1963. The SCAB attained the State 1- hour NO2 standard in 1994, bringing the entire state into attainment. A new state annual average standard of 0.030 ppm was adopted by the ARB in February 2007 (25). The new standard is just barely exceeded in the SCAQMD. NO2 is formed from NOX emissions, which also contribute to O3.

0.00 5.00

10.00 15.00

20.00 25.00

30.00 CO (ppm)
Year
Maximum 8-hour CO Averages
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
31 As a result, the majority of the future emission control measures will be implemented as part of the overall O3 control strategy. Many of these control measures will target mobile sources, which account for more than three-quarters of California’s NOX emissions. These measures are expected to bring the SCAQMD into attainment of the state annual average standard.

TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2018) TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2018) F.1.c
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
32 2.9.1 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS (TAC) TRENDS
In 1984, as a result of public concern for exposure to airborne carcinogens, CARB adopted regulations to reduce the amount of TAC emissions resulting from mobile and area sources, such as cars, trucks, stationary products, and consumer products. According to the Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California journal article (26) which was prepared for CARB, results show that between 1990-2012, ambient concentration and emission trends for the seven TACs responsible for most of the known cancer risk associated with airborne exposure in California have declined significantly (between 1990 and 2012). The seven TACs studied include those that are derived from mobile sources: diesel particulate matter (DPM), benzene (C6H6), and 1,3-butadiene (C4H6); those that are derived from stationary sources: perchloroethylene (C2Cl4) and hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)); and those derived from photochemical reactions of emitted VOCs: formaldehyde (CH2O) and acetaldehyde (C2H4O)2. The decline in ambient concentration and emission trends of these TACs are a result of various regulations CARB has implemented to address cancer risk.

MOBILE SOURCE TACS
CARB introduced two programs that aimed at reducing mobile emissions for light and medium duty vehicles through vehicle emissions controls and cleaner fuel. In California, light-duty vehicles sold after 1996 are equipped with California’s second-generation On-Board Diagnostic (OBD-II) system. The OBD-II system monitors virtually every component that can affect the emission performance of the vehicle to ensure that the vehicle remains as clean as possible over its entire life and assists repair technicians in diagnosing and fixing problems with the computerized engine controls. If a problem is detected, the OBD-II system illuminates a warning lamp on the vehicle instrument panel to alert the driver. This warning lamp typically contains the phrase “Check Engine” or “Service Engine Soon”. The system will also store important information about the detected malfunction so that a repair technician can accurately find and fix the problem. CARB has recently developed similar OBD requirements for heavy-duty vehicles over 14,000 pounds (lbs). CARB’s phase II Reformulated Gasoline Regulation (RFG-2), adopted in 1996, also led to a reduction of mobile source emissions. Through such regulations, benzene levels declined 88% from 1990-2012. 1,3-Butadiene concentrations also declined 85% from 1990-2012 as a result of the use of reformulated gasoline and motor vehicle regulations (26).

In 2000, CARB’s Diesel Risk Reduction Plan (DRRP) recommended the replacement and retrofit of diesel-fueled engines and the use of ultra-low-sulfur (<15 ppm) diesel fuel. As a result of these measures, DPM concentrations have declined 68% since 2000, even though the state’s population increased 31% and the amount of diesel vehicles miles traveled increased 81%, as shown on Exhibit 2-B. With the implementation of these diesel-related control regulations, CARB expects a DPM decline of 71% for 2000-2020.
2 It should be noted that ambient DPM concentrations are not measured directly. Rather, a surrogate method using the coefficient of haze (COH) and elemental carbon (EC) is used to estimate DPM concentrations.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
33 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND
Source: 2020 CARB

DIESEL REGULATIONS
CARB and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (POLA and POLB) have adopted several iterations of regulations for diesel trucks that are aimed at reducing DPM. More specifically, CARB Drayage Truck Regulation (27), CARB statewide On-road Truck and Bus Regulation (28), and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Clean Truck Program (CTP) require accelerated implementation of “clean trucks” into the statewide truck fleet (29). In other words, older more polluting trucks will be replaced with newer, cleaner trucks as a function of these regulatory requirements.

Moreover, the average statewide DPM emissions for Heavy Duty Trucks (HDT), in terms of grams of DPM generated per mile traveled, will dramatically be reduced due to the aforementioned regulatory requirements.

Diesel emissions identified in this analysis would therefore overstate future DPM emissions since not all the regulatory requirements are reflected in the modeling.

CANCER RISK TRENDS
Based on information available from CARB, overall cancer risk throughout the SCAB has had a declining trend since 1990. In 1998, following an exhaustive 10-year scientific assessment process, CARB identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant. The SCAQMD initiated a comprehensive urban toxic air pollution study called the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES). DPM accounts for more than 70% of the cancer risk.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
34 In 2008 the SCAQMD prepared an update to the MATES-II study, referred to as MATES-III. MATESIII estimates the average excess cancer risk level from exposure to TACs is an approximately 17% decrease in comparison to the MATES-II study.

In 2015, the SCAQMD published an in-depth analysis of the toxic air contaminants and the resulting health risks for all of Southern California. The Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the SCAB, MATES IV” shows that cancer risk decreased less than 50% between 2005 and 2015 (30).

MATES-IV study represents the baseline health risk for a cumulative analysis. MATES-IV calculated cancer risks based on monitoring data collected at ten fixed sites within the SCAB.

None of the fixed monitoring sites are within the local area of the Project site. However, MATESIV has extrapolated the excess cancer risk levels throughout the SCAB by modeling the specific grids. MATES-IV modeling predicted an excess cancer risk of 587.29 in one million for the geographic grid containing the Project site. DPM is included in this cancer risk along with all other TAC sources. DPM accounts for 68% of the total risk shown in MATES-IV. Cumulative Project generated TACs are limited to DPM.

In January 2018, as part of the overall effort to reduce air toxics exposure in the SCAB, SCAQMD began conducting the MATES V Program. MATES V field measurements were conducted at ten fixed sites (the same sites selected for MATES III and IV) to assess trends in air toxics levels.

MATES V also included measurements of ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC) concentrations, which can be compared to the UFP levels measured in MATES IV (31). The final report for the MATES V study was expected to be available in Fall 2019, however it is not yet available and no definitive date for its release has been provided by SCAQMD.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
35 This page intentionally left blank
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
36 3 PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACT

3.1 INTRODUCTION
This study quantifies air quality emissions generated by construction and operation of the Project and addresses whether the Project conflicts with implementation of the SCAQMD’s AQMP. The analysis of Project-generated air emissions determines whether the Project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the SCAB is in nonattainment under an applicable NAAQS and CAAQS. Additionally, the Project has been evaluated to determine whether the Project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and the impacts of odors. The significance of these potential impacts is described in the following section.

3.2 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related air quality impacts are taken from the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to air quality if it would (1):
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

The SCAQMD has also developed regional significance thresholds for other regulated pollutants, as summarized at Table 3-1 (32). The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (April 2019) indicate that any projects in the SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact.

TABLE 3-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
Pollutant Regional Construction Threshold Regional Operational Thresholds NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day
Pb 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day
lbs/day = Pounds Per Day
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
37 3.3 MODELS EMPLOYED TO ANALYZE AIR QUALITY

3.3.1 CALIFORNIA EMISSIONS ESTIMATOR MODEL (CALEEMOD)
Land uses such as the Project affect air quality through construction-source and operationalsource emissions.

On October 17, 2017, the SCAQMD in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from MMs (33). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality emissions. Output from the model runs for both construction and operational activity are provided in Appendices 3.1 through 3.3.

3.3.2 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL
On August 19, 2019, the EPA approved the 2017 version of the EMissions FACtor model (EMFAC) web database for use in SIP and transportation conformity analyses. EMFAC2017 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (34). This AQIA utilizes summer, winter, and annual EMFAC2017 emission factors in order to derive vehicle emissions associated with Project operational activities, which vary by season.

Because the EMFAC2017 emission rates are associated with vehicle fuel types while CalEEMod vehicle emission factors are aggregated to include all fuel types for each individual vehicle class, the EMFAC2017 emission rates for different fuel types of a vehicle class are averaged by activity or by population and activity to derive CalEEMod emission factors. The equations applied to obtain CalEEMod vehicle emission factors for each emission type are detailed in CalEEMod User’s Guide Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod (35).

3.4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS

3.4.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Construction activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
38 GRADING ACTIVITIES
Dust is typically a major concern during grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called “fugitive emissions”. Fugitive dust emissions rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). CalEEMod was utilized to calculate fugitive dust emissions resulting from this phase of activity. This analysis assumes that earthwork activities are expected to balance on site and no import or export of soils would be required.

CONSTRUCTION WORKER VEHICLE TRIPS
Construction emissions for construction worker vehicles traveling to and from the Project site, as well as vendor trips (construction materials delivered to the Project site) were estimated based on information from CalEEMod model defaults.

3.4.2 CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction is expected to commence in October 2021 and will last through June 2022. The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 3-2, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario should construction occur any time after the respective dates since emission factors for construction decrease as time passes and the analysis year increases due to emission regulations becoming more stringent.3 The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (1). The duration of construction activity was based on the 2022 opening year.

TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Phase Name Start Date End Date Days
Site Preparation 10/04/2021 10/15/2021 10
Grading 10/16/2021 11/26/2021 30
Building Construction 11/27/2021 06/24/2022 150
Paving 05/28/2022 06/24/2022 20
Architectural Coating 05/01/2022 06/24/2022 40
Source: Construction activity based the 2022 opening year.

3.4.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment listed in Table 3-3 will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the code. It should be 3 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2, Section 4.3 “OFFROAD Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
39 noted that most pieces of equipment would likely operate for fewer hours per day. A summary of construction equipment assumptions by phase is provided at Table 3-3.

TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Phase Name Equipment A,B Amount Hours Per Day
Site Preparation
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Grading
Crawler Tractors 2 8
Excavators 2 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Scrapers 2 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Welders 1 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Water Trucks 1 4
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8

A
In order to account for fugitive dust emissions associated with Site Preparation and Grading activities, Crawler Tractors were used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes.

B As Water Trucks are driven on-road, emissions associated with the operations of Water Trucks have been modeled as additional trips (two 2-way trips per Water Truck).

3.4.4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY

IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION
CalEEMod calculates maximum daily emissions for summer and winter periods. As such, the estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation for both summer and winter periods are summarized on Table 3-4. Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Appendix 3.1. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction would not exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
40 TABLE 3-4: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY – WITHOUT MITIGATION Year
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
2021 5.43 61.02 32.00 0.10 14.04 6.81
2022 54.69 42.10 50.18 0.13 6.92 2.92
Winter
2021 5.43 61.02 31.86 0.09 14.04 6.81
2022 54.68 42.02 47.88 0.13 6.39 2.92
Maximum Daily Emissions 54.69 61.02 50.18 0.13 14.04 6.81 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod unmitigated regional construction-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1.

3.5 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operational activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational emissions would be expected from the following primary sources:
• Area Source Emissions
• Energy Source Emissions
• Mobile Source Emissions
• On-Site Cargo Handling Equipment Emissions

3.5.1 AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS

ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS
Over a period of time the buildings that are part of this Project will require maintenance and will therefore produce emissions resulting from the evaporation of solvents contained in paints, varnishes, primers, and other surface coatings. The emissions associated with architectural coatings were calculated using CalEEMod.

CONSUMER PRODUCTS
Consumer products include, but are not limited to detergents, cleaning compounds, polishes, personal care products, and lawn and garden products. Many of these products contain organic compounds which when released in the atmosphere can react to form ozone and other photochemically reactive pollutants. The emissions associated with use of consumer products were calculated based on defaults provided within CalEEMod.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
41 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the Project. The emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment were calculated based on assumptions provided in CalEEMod.

3.5.2 ENERGY SOURCE EMISSIONS

COMBUSTION EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRICITY Criteria pollutant emissions are emitted through the generation of electricity and consumption of natural gas.

When combustion of natural gas occurs within a building, the building is considered a direct emission source and CalEEMod will calculate emissions of all criteria pollutants (35). For purposes of analysis, the emissions associated with natural gas use were calculated using CalEEMod.

CalEEMod also calculates criteria pollutants from generation of electricity associated with a building. It should be noted that when electricity is used in buildings, the electricity generation typically takes place offsite (i.e. power plants). Because power plants are existing stationary sources, criteria pollutant emissions are generally associated with the power plants and not the individual buildings or electricity users (35). Since electricity will be provided to the Project by Southern California Edison, Project-related electricity generation is considered to take place offsite and therefore criteria pollutant emissions are not accounted for.

TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.

The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and became effective on January 1, 2020. The CEC anticipates that nonresidential buildings will use approximately 30% less energy compared to the prior code (36). The CalEEMod defaults for Title 24 – Electricity and Lighting Energy were reduced by 30% in order to reflect consistency with the 2019 Title 24 standard.

3.5.3 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS
The Project related operational air quality emissions derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project, including employee and driver trips to and from the site and truck trips associated with the proposed uses. Trip characteristics available from the Alessandro Warehouse Traffic Analysis (TA) report were utilized in this analysis. Per the TA, the Project would generate a total of approximately 742 two-way vehicular trips per day (371 inbound and 371 outbound), including 224 two-way truck trips per day (112 inbound and 112 outbound) (37).

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
42 3.5.3.1 APPROACH FOR ESTIMATE OF MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS Two separate model runs were utilized to accurately analyze emissions resulting from passenger car and truck operations.

PASSENGER CAR
For purposes of analysis, the CalEEMod default trip length of 16.6 miles was utilized along with an assumption of 100% primary trips. It is important to note that although the TA does not breakdown passenger cars by type, this analysis assumes that passenger cars include Light-DutyAuto vehicles (LDA), Light-Duty-Trucks (LDT14 & LDT25 ), and Medium-Duty-Vehicles (MDV)
vehicle types. In order to account for emissions generated by employees, the fleet mix presented in Table 3-5 was utilized in this analysis. Additional details on the use of the applicable fleet mix can be found in the footnote to Table 3-5.

TABLE 3-5: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX6
Land Use Vehicle Type %
Building 1
Warehouse/
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse
LDA 61.73
LDT1 4.17
LDT2 21.05
MDV 13.05
Building 2
Warehouse/
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse
LDA 61.73
LDT1 4.17
LDT2 21.05
MDV 13.05
TRUCKS
The second run analyzed truck emissions, incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length of 40 miles7and an assumption of 100% primary trips. In order to be consistent with the TA, trucks are broken down by truck type. The trucks are comprised of 2-axle/Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (LHDT), 3-axle/Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks (MHDT), and 4+-axle/Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks (HHDT). In order to account for emissions generated by trucks, the fleet mix presented in 4 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs.
5 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs. 6 The Project-specific employee and driver fleet mix used in this analysis is based on a proportional split utilizing the CalEEMod default percentage assigned to LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV vehicle types. 7 The average trip length for heavy trucks were based on the SCAQMD documents for the implementation of the Facility Based Mobile Source Measures (FBMSMs) adopted in the 2016 AQMP. SCAQMD’s “Preliminary Warehouse Emission Calculations” cites 39.9-mile trip length for heavy-heavy trucks (41). As a conservative measure, a trip length of 40 miles has been utilized for all trucks for the purpose of this analysis.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
43 Table 3-6 was utilized in this analysis. Additional details on the use of the applicable fleet mix can be found in the footnote to Table 3-6.

TABLE 3-6: TRUCK FLEET MIX8
Land Use Vehicle Type %
Building 1
Warehouse
LHDT 16.32
MHDT 20.41
HHDT 63.27
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse
LHDT 35.30
MHDT 11.76
HHDT 52.94
Building 2
Warehouse
LHDT 16.67
MHDT 22.22
HHDT 61.11
High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse
LHDT 36.36
MHDT 9.09
HHDT 54.55

FUGITIVE DUST RELATED TO VEHICULAR TRAVEL
Vehicles traveling on paved roads would be a source of fugitive emissions due to the generation of road dust inclusive of break and tire wear particulates. The emissions estimates for travel on paved roads were calculated using CalEEMod.

3.5.4 ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS
It is common for industrial warehouse buildings to require cargo handling equipment to move empty containers and empty chassis to and from the various pieces of cargo handling equipment that receive and distribute containers. The most common type of cargo handling equipment is the yard truck which is designed for moving cargo containers. Yard trucks are also known as yard goats, utility tractors (UTRs), hustlers, yard hostlers, and yard tractors. The cargo handling equipment is assumed to have a horsepower (hp) range of approximately 175 hp to 200 hp. Based on the latest available information from SCAQMD (38); for example, high-cube warehouse projects typically have 3.6 yard trucks per million sf of building space. For this particular Project, based on the maximum square footage of each building space, on-site modeled operational equipment includes up to two (2) 200 hp, compressed natural gas or gasoline-powered yard tractors operating at 4 hours a day for 365 days of the year. 8 Project-specific truck fleet mix is based on the number of trips generated by each truck type (LHDT, MHDT, HHDT) relative to the total number of truck trips generated by the Project.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
44 3.5.5 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY

IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION
As previously stated, CalEEMod utilizes summer and winter EMFAC2017 emission factors in order to derive vehicle emissions associated with Project operational activities, which vary by season.

The estimated operational-source emissions are summarized on Tables 3-7. Detailed operation model outputs for the Project are presented in Appendices 3.2 through 3.3. As shown on Table 3-7, the Project’s daily regional emissions from on-going operations will not exceed any of the thresholds of significance.

TABLE 3-7: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS– WITHOUT MITIGATION Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Area Source 9.02 7.20E-04 0.08 0.00 2.80E-04 2.80E-04
Energy Source 0.19 1.73 1.45 0.01 0.13 0.13
Mobile Source (Passenger Cars) 1.27 1.18 18.96 0.06 6.56 1.76 Mobile Source (Trucks) 1.26 45.31 9.68 0.21 8.51 2.79
On-Site Equipment Source 0.24 2.54 1.52 0.01 0.09 0.08
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 11.99 50.76 31.68 0.28 15.30 4.76 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Winter
Area Source 9.02 7.20E-04 0.08 0.00 2.80E-04 2.80E-04
Energy Source 0.19 1.73 1.45 0.01 0.13 0.13
Mobile Source (Passenger Cars) 1.21 1.25 16.16 0.05 6.56 1.76 Mobile Source (Trucks) 1.23 47.16 8.83 0.21 8.51 2.78
On-Site Equipment Source 0.24 2.54 1.52 0.01 0.09 0.08
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 11.90 52.68 28.05 0.28 15.29 0.00 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod regional operational-source emissions are presented in Appendices 3.2 through 3.3.

F.1.c
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
45 3.6 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE

BACKGROUND ON LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD (LST) DEVELOPMENT The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology) (39). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs).

The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-4
9 . LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses.

LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. To address the issue of localized significance, the SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. The analysis makes use of methodology included in the LST Methodology (40).

APPLICABILITY OF LSTS FOR THE PROJECT
For this Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST analysis is the SCAQMD Perris Valley (SRA 24).

LSTs apply to CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size.

In order to determine the appropriate methodology for determining localized impacts that could occur as a result of Project-related construction, the following process is undertaken:
• Identify the maximum daily on-site emissions that will occur during construction activity:
o The maximum daily on-site emissions could be based on information provided by the Project Applicant; or
o The SCAQMD’s Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds and CalEEMod User’s Guide Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod can be used to determine the maximum site acreage that is actively disturbed based on the construction equipment fleet and equipment hours as estimated in CalEEMod (41) (35). • If the total acreage disturbed is less than or equal to 5 acres per day, then the SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized to determine if a Project has the potential to result in a significant impact. The look-up tables establish a maximum daily emissions threshold in lbs/day that can be compared to CalEEMod outputs.
9 The purpose of SCAQMD’s Environmental Justice program is to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air within their communities. Further, the SCAQMD defines Environmental Justice as “…equitable environmental policymaking and enforcement to protect the health of all residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.” F.1.c
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Appendix A1-Air Quality Impact Analysis (5554 : PEN20-0118-0119, PEN20-0122 and PEN 20-0124 Compass Danbe) Compass Danbe Centerpointe Air Quality Impact Analysis
13661-02 AQ Report
46 • If the total acreage disturbed is greater than 5 acres per day, then LST impacts may still be conservatively evaluated using the LST look-up tables for a 5-acre disturbance area. Use of the 5- acre disturbance area thresholds can be used to show that even if the daily emissions from all construction activity were emitted within a 5-acre area, and therefore concentrated over a smaller area which would result in greater site adjacent concentrations, the impacts would still be less than significant if the applicable 5-acre thresholds are utilized. • The LST Methodology presents mass emission rates for each SRA, project sizes of 1, 2, and 5 acres, and nearest receptor distances of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. For project sizes between the values given, or with receptors at distances between the given receptors, the methodology uses linear interpolation to determine the thresholds.