Agenda packet — Moreno Valley City Council, December 20, 2022 (part 1 of 4)

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF

THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

December 20, 2022

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
-1-

City Council Study Sessions
Second Tuesday of each month – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Meetings
Special Presentations – 5:30 P.M.

First & Third Tuesday of each month – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Closed Sessions
Will be scheduled as needed at 4:30 p.m.

City Hall Council Chamber – 14177 Frederick Street

Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabiliti es Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who re quires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the ADA Coordinator, at 951.413.3350 at least 72 hours before the meeting. The 72 -hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Ulises Cabrera, Mayor

Edward A. Delgado, Mayor Pro Tem David Marquez, Council Member

Cheylynda Barnard, Council Member Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member ..

-2-
AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
December 20, 2022

CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 PM

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE
.
-3-
.AGENDA

JOINT MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

AND THE BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

*THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVES A SEPARATE STIPEND FOR CSD
MEETINGS*

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
DECEMBER 20, 2022

CALL TO ORDER

Joint Meeting of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority and the Board of Library Trustees - actions taken at the Joint Meeting are t hose of the Agency indicated on each Agenda item.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

INVOCATION
Dr. Cooper Hagans III, from Unity of the Faith Christian Outreach Ministries

INTRODUCTIONS

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT ON OR NOT ON THE AGENDA UNDER

THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS (SECTIONS A-E)
All items listed under the Consent Calendars, Sections A, B, C, D, and E are considered to be routine and non -controversial, and may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency , Housing Authority or the Board of Library Trustees requests that an item be removed for separate action. The motion to adopt the Consent Calendars is deemed to be a separate motion by each Agency and shall be so recorded by the City Clerk. Items withdr awn for report or discussion will be heard after public hearing items.

-4-
A. CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL
A.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

A.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - December 6, 2022.

Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

A.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - December 6, 2022.

Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

A.4. SPECIAL EVENTS CALENDAR 2023 (Report of: Parks & Community Services)
Recommendation:

Receive and file the Special Events Calendar 2023.

A.5. LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

A.6. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH
ADVANCED APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC., DBA INFR ASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS, AND 4LEAF, INC., FOR PLANNING CONSULTANT
SERVICES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS (AGMTS NO. 2022 -30-01 AND 2022-31-01) (Report of: Community Development)
Recommendations:

1. Approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Planning Consultant Services on an As Needed Basis with Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers, and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Ame ndment, and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and available budget as previously approved by Council; and

-5-

Authorize the Purchasing Division Manager to approve a change order to increase Purchase Order #2023 -505 to Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers; and

3. Approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Planning Consultant Services on an As Needed Basis with 4Leaf, Inc., and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment, and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and available budget as previously approved by Council; and

4. Authorize an increase of $150,000.00 to the amount of the Agreement with 4Leaf, Inc. , to $200,000.00, fund ed by fees paid by project applicants. Authorize the Purchasing Division Manager to approve a change order to increase Purchase Order #2023 -504 to 4Leaf, Inc. ; and

5. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer, or his designee, to make the appropriate budget ad justments as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.

A.7. AUTHORIZE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH M.

BREY ELECTRIC, INC. FOR GENER AL CONTRACTOR SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES, TRAILS, AND PARKS. (Report of: Public Works) Recommendations:

1. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for General Contractor Services with M. Brey Electric, Inc., to increase the contract value funded throu gh Facilities Maintenance (Fund 7310), General Fund (Fund 1010), and PCS Capital Project Fund (Fund 3015), which will increase responsiveness to on -call needs throughout the cont ract term.

2. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement for General Contractor Services with M.

Brey Electric, Inc., to increase the contract amount by $2,000,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of the five-year Agreement of $3,760,000.

3. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement, any subsequent future amendments, and Pur chase Orders subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in accordance with approved terms of the agreement and within available budget previously approved by Council.

-6-
A.8. PAYMENT REGISTER – OCTOBER 2022 (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the Payment Register.

B. CONSENT CALENDAR-COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
B.1. ORDINANCES – READING BY TITLE ONLY – THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

B.2. MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING – DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.2)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

B.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.3)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

C. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING AUTHORITY
C.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

C.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.2)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

C.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.3)
-7-
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR - BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES
D.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT C ALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

D.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.2)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

D.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.3)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
E.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

E.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.2)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

E.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 6, 2022. (SEE A.3)
Recommendation:

1. Approve as submitted.

-8-
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Questions or comments from the public on a Public Hearing matter are limited to five minutes per individual and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to speak should complete and submit a GOLDENROD speaker slip to the Sergeant-at-Arms.

F.1. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND A TENTAT IVE TRACT MAP 37858 TO SUBDIVIDE A 4.81 -ACRE PROJECT SITE IN TO 37 SINGLE -FAMILY LOTS (Report of: Community Development)
That the City Council consider the Appeal filed by RC Hobbs Company, (the “Appellant”) appealing the Planning Commission’s denial of t he Appellant’s application for a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map to facilitate a 37 -lot single- family residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), located North of Cactus Avenue, East of Moreno B each Drive, and take any action the City Council deems appropriate.

Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022 -XX, attached hereto, DENYING Appeal PAA22-0004.

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, attached hereto:

1. ADOPTING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment (PEN20 -0174), Change of Zone (PEN20 -0175); Tentative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20 -0172), and Conditional Use Permit (PEN20 -0173) for a Planned Unit Development, on file with the Com munity Development
Department, incorporated herein by this reference, which was completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and reflects that the Planning Commission and City reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial S tudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and exercised its independent judgment and analysis of the Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts; and

2. ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Proposed Project, which consis ts of a Conditional Use Permit (PEN20 -0173) for a Planned Unit Development and Tentative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20 -0172) pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

-9-

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022 -XX, attached hereto, APPROVING Appeal PAA22-0004:

1. APPROVING General Pl an Amendment (PEN20 -0174) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-XX and any necessary and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect the proposed changes i n the zoning classification and/or redistricting associated with the General Plan Amendment.

2. APPROVING Conditional Use Permit (PEN20 -0173) and Tentative Tract Map (PEN20 -0172) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Reco rds and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-XX.

3. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. [next in order] approving Change of Zone (PEN20-0175) and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas and the conditions of approval, based on the Recitals, Evidence and Fin dings contained in the Administrative Record of the proceedings.

F.2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE, CONDITIONAL USE

PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 38237 TO SUBDIVIDE AN 8.77 -ACRE PROJECT SITE IN TO 67 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS (Report of: Community Development) Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, attached hereto:

1) ADOPTING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment (PEN21 -0203), Change of Zone (PEN 21-0204), Conditional Use Permit (PEN22 -0162), and Tentative Tract Map 38237 (PEN21 -0199) on file with the Community Development Departmen t, incorporated herein by this reference, which was completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a nd reflects that the Planning Commission and City reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Decl aration, and exercised its independent judgment and analysis of the Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts; and

2) ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Proposed Project, which consists of a General Plan Amendme nt (PEN21-0203), Change of Zone (PEN21 -0204), Conditional Use Permit (PEN20 -0173) for a Planned Unit Development and T entative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20 -0172) pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.
-10-

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, attached hereto:

1. APPROVING General Plan Amendment (PEN21 -0203) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-XX and any necessary and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect the proposed changes in the zoning classification and/or redistricting associated with the General Plan Amendment.

2. APPROVING Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0162), and Tentative Tract Map 38237 (PEN21 -0199) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrati ve Records and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-XX.

3. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. [next in order] approving Change of Zone (PEN21-0204) and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas and the conditions of approval, based on the Recitals, Evid ence and Findings contained in the Administrative Record of the proceedings.

F.3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT S AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN TITLE 9 PLANNING AND ZONING, INCLUDING CHAPTER 9.02 PERMITS AND APPROVALS, CHAPTER 9.09 SPECIFIC USE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, CHAPTER 9.13 SPECIFIC PLANS,
CHAPTER 9.14 LAND DIVISIONS, AND CHAPTER 9.16 DESIGN
GUIDELINES; TITLE 3 REVENUE AND FINANCE CHAPTER 3.32 FEE AND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE/COST COMPARISON SYSTEM; AND TITLE 8 BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, CHAPTER 8.12 (FLOOD DAMAGE

PREVENTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP)). (Report of: Community Development) Recommendations:

1. Introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. XXX amending Tables 9.02.020 -1 and Sections 9.02.040, 9.02.150,

9.07.010(B), 9.08.070, 9.09.080, 9.11.040, 9.14.065, and 9.14.090 of Title 9 of the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code to provide updates that comply with State requirements related to compliance with new State Law and Housing and Community Development (HCD)
requirements, streamline Code requirements to provide flexibility and clarity regarding existing requirements, and to streamline certain processes, and provide for other minor clarifications and clean -up items; and,

2. Introduce and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. XXX deleting Section 3.32.050 (Statutory Public Meeting) of Title 3 (R evenue an d Finance), and amending Section 8.12.170 (Standards of Construction) of Title 8 (Building and Construction) to provide updates that comply -11-
with State requirements; and

3. Schedule the second reading and adoption of Ordinance Nos. XXX, and XXX for the next regular Council meeting.

G. GENERAL BUSINESS
G.1. CENSURE RESOLUTION (Report of: City Attorney)
Recommendation:

1. That the City Council take whatever action it deems necessary under the circumstances.

G.2. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - SELECTION OF MAY OR PRO TEM (Report of: City Clerk)
Recommendation:

1. Conduct the reorganization of the City Council by selecting one Council Member to serve a one-year term as Mayor Pro Tem.

H. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDARS FOR DISCUSSION OR

SEPARATE ACTION

I. REPORTS
I.1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
(Informational Oral Presentation - not for Council action) March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) School District/City Joint Task Force
I.2. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS
-12-
I.3. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
(Informational Oral Presentation - not for Council action)

CLOSING COMMENTS AND/OR REPORTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY AS SUCCESSOR AG ENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, HOUSING AUTHORITY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND THE BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES.

ADJOURNMENT

PUBLIC INSPECTION
The contents of the agenda packet are available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

Any written information related to an open session agenda item that is known by the City to have been distributed to all or a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to this meeting will be made available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.
..

CERTIFICATION
I, Jane Halstead, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, certify that 72 hours prior to this Regular Meeting, the City Council Agenda was posted on the City’s website at: www.moval.org and in the following three public places pursuant to City of Moreno Valley Resolution No. 2007-40:

City Hall, City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street

Moreno Valley Library
25480 Alessandro Boulevard

Moreno Valley Senior/Community Center
25075 Fir Avenue

Jane Halstead, CMC
City Clerk

Date Posted: 12/15/2022

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY December 6, 2022

-1-
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 PM

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS -NONE

A.2
Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -2-

MINUTES

JOINT MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
December 6, 2022

CALL TO ORDER

The Joint Meeting of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Housing Authority, Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority and the Board of Library Trustees was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Gutierrez in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street.

Mayor Gutierrez announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz.

ROLL CALL

Council: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez Mayor
Edward A. Delgado Mayor Pro Tem
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz Council Member
Ulises Cabrera Council Member
David Marquez Council Member

Roll Call

INTRODUCTIONS

Staff: Jane Halstead Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City A.2
Packet Pg. 14
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -3-
Council/City Clerk
Jasmin Rivera Management Assistant
Steven Quintanilla Interim City Attorney
Mike Lee City Manager
Brian Mohan Assistant City Manager, Chief Financial
Officer, City Treasurer
Michael Lloyd Assistant City Manager
Manuel Mancha Community Development Director
Melissa Walker Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer Jeremy Bubnick Parks and Community Services Director
Scott Burns Lieutenant, Police Department
Jesse Park Fire Chief

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ANY SUBJECT ON OR NOT ON THE AGENDA UNDER

THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

Seth Cox

1. Displeased with City
James Williamson

1. Pedrorena Park
Matt Seeley

1. Juan Bautista Multi Use Trail bid
Ghazi Mubarak

1. Juan Bautista Multi Use Trail bid
Rosa Bravo

1. Homelessness
Sammie Luna

1. Homelessness
Daryl Terrell

1. 2022 Election
Bob Palomarez

1. Senior Center Expansion
A.2
Packet Pg. 15
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -4-
Fred Banuelos

1. Thanked City Staff

2. Moreno Valley Trade Center

3. Cannabis Permits
Bill Redden

1. 37 lot development project
Roy Bleckert

1. City Council meeting procedure

2. Warehouse jobs
Louise Palomarez

1. 2022 Election

2. Critical of Council Member Marquez
Eddie Bautista

1. 2022 Election
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:

CONTINUANCE OF MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER/PARK PROJECT
PUBLIC HEARING TO A DATE UNCERTAIN (Report of: City Attorney) Recommendation:

That the City Council continue this item to a date uncertain and direct staff to re-notice the continued public hearing date once it is set.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: David Marquez, Council Member
SECONDER: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member
AYES: Delgado, Baca-Santa Cruz, Gutierrez, Marquez, Cabrera

JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS (SECTIONS A-E)
All items listed under the Consent Calendars, Sections A, B, C, D, and E are considered to be routine and non -controversial, and may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for A.2
Packet Pg. 16
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -5-
the Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority or the Board of Library Trustees requests that an item be removed for separate action. The motion to adopt the Consent Calendars is deemed to be a separate motion by each Agency and shall be so recorded by the City Clerk. Items withdrawn for report or discussion will be heard after public hearing items.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ulises Cabrera, Council Member
SECONDER: David Marquez, Council Member
AYES: Delgado, Baca-Santa Cruz, Gutierrez, Marquez, Cabrera A. CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL
A.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONL Y - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

A.2. City Council - Regular Meeting - Nov 1, 2022 6:00 PM Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

A.3. City Council - Closed Session - Nov 1, 2022 4:30 PM Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

A.4. City Council - Regular Meeting - Nov 15, 2022 6:00 PM Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

A.5. MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMI SSIONS (Report of: City Clerk)
Recommendation:

1. Receive and confirm the slate of Mayoral appointments as follows:

EMERGING LEADERS COUNCIL

Name Position Term
Gabriel Canonoy* Member Ending 05/31/2023
Sophia Navarro* Member Ending 05/31/2023
Aneth M artinez –
Pasos*
Member Ending 05/31/2023
Enrique Flores* Member Ending 05/31/2023

A.2
Packet Pg. 17
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -6-

LIBRARY COMMISSION

Name Position Term
Jenn Carson* Member Ending 06/30/23

PARKS, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND TRAILS COMMITTEE

Name Position Term
Christopher Murphy* Member Ending 06/30/23

SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD

Name Position Term
Deborah Elkins* Member Ending 06/30/25
Pauline Saldana* Member Ending 06/30/25
Robert Moya* Member Ending 06/30/25

UTILITIES COMMISSION

Name Position Term
Reginald Allen Member Ending 06/30/25

* Pending successful completion of a background check

A.6. PAYMENT REGISTER - SEPTEMBER 2022 (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the Payment Register.

A.7. 6007: LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

A.8. ACCEPT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PART 2 (ERAP2) REALLOCATION OF FUNDS (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendations:

1. Accept the U.S. Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program Part 2 (“ERAP2”) Reallocation funds in the amount of $186,233.

A.2
Packet Pg. 18
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -7-

2. Designate and authorize the Chief Financial Officer as authorized signatory to execute requir ed Emergency Rental Assistance Program Part 2 (“ERAP2”) Reallocation documents.

3. Authorize a budget amendment as set forth in the fiscal impact section.

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute program management contracts with United Way of Inland V alleys to provide Financial Assistance and Housing Stability Services.

5. Authorize the City Manager to accept any additional redirected Emergency Rental Assistance Program funding from the U.S.

Treasury and to amend said agreements necessary as addition al funds are made available.

A.9. RECOMMENDED ANIMAL SHELTER EXPANSION AND REFURBISHMENT PROGRAM PLAN (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendation:

1. Approve the recommended Animal Shelter Expansion and Refurbishment Program Plan which will be funded by t he Development Impact Fee - Animal Shelter Maintenance Fund (Up to $500,000) for Phase 1 at this time; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related agreements, extensions, or amendments subject to the procurement policy and approval of the City Attorney up to the total cost of the project and available Council approved budget in the Development Impact Fee – Animal Shelter Maintenance Fund; and

3. Amend the Capital Improvement Plan to include this project (Animal Shelter Expansion and Refurbishment 803 0058).

A.10. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION REDUCING THE NUMBER OF

COMMERCIAL CANNABIS REGULATORY PERMITS ALLOWED IN EACH
CATEGORY (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation: That the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 202 2-74, a Resolution reducing the maximum number of Commercial Cannabis Regulatory Permits and Conditional Use Permits allowed in each category pursuant to the Moreno Valley Municipal Code.

A.2
Packet Pg. 19
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -8-
A.11. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF THE WORKFORCE

DEVELOPMENT FAC ILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND PUBLIC ART IMPACT FEE (ORDINANCE NO. XX) (Report of: Public Works) Recommendation:

1. That the City Council conduct second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 992.

A.12. ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MORENO V ALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT TO QUIMBY IN - LIEU FEES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.40.110 OF THE MORENO
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (Report of: Parks & Community Services) Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -75, authorizing an adjustment to Q uimby In-Lieu fees effective January 1, 2023.

A.13. APPROVE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ENERGY ASSISTANCE AND

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, AND APPROVE CONTINUATION OF SUSPENSION OF LATE FEES AND DISCONNECTS (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Approve an additional budget allocation of $300,000 for Utility Assistance Programs;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Agreement with Synergy Companies expanding the Energy Audit and Direct Installation program by $500,000 annually; and a uthorize the City Manager to approve and execute any subsequent amendments subject to the approval by the City Attorney;

3. Approve suspension of late fees and disconnects for non -payment to comply with requirements of the California Arrearage Payment Program (CAPP); and

4. Approve Resolution 2022 -76. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, to confirm the Electric Rates and Rules for Moreno Valley Utility.

A.14. APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES WITH WSP USA INC.

FOR THE MORENO MDP LINE F -18 AND F -19, PROJECT NO. 804 0017 (Report of: Public Works)
A.2
Packet Pg. 20
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -9-
Recommendations:

1. Approve the Second Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services to WSP USA Inc (WSP USA) to provide design related services for the Moreno Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line F - 18 and F -19 project, funded with Measure A funds (Fund 2001) and Public Works Capital Projects funds (Fund 3002);

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services with WSP USA, subject to the approval of the City Attorney;

3. Authorize an amendment to the existing Purchase Order with WSP USA in the amount of up to but not to exceed $326,256.00;

4. Authorize an amendment to the Agreement termination date, extending the termination date from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2025; and

5. Authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute any subsequent related amendments to the agreement with WSP USA, not to exceed the Purchase Order amount, subject to the approval by the City Attorney.

A.15. AUTHORIZE THE AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO HUNTER CONSULTING INC., DBA HCI ENVIRONMENTAL &

ENGINEERING FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN -UP, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL SERVICES (Report of: Public Works)

1. Award a five -year contract to Hunter Consulting Inc., dba HCI Environmental & Engineering for a total not -to-exceed amount of $300,000 for Hazardous Waste Clean -up, Removal, and Disposal Services on a routine and on -call ba sis; and authorize the City Manager to execute contracts in conformance with the attached Agreement funded through State Gasoline Tax (Fund 2000), Facilities Maintenance (Fund 7310), and Fleet Operations (Fund 7410);

2. Authorize the issuance of annual purchase orders for Hunter Consulting Inc., dba HCI Environmental & Engineering on a routine and as needed basis each year of the Agreement term subject to funds available in the City Council approved Operating Budget; and

3. Authorize the City Manager, o r h is designee, to execute the agreement and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in accordance with approved terms of the agreement.

A.2
Packet Pg. 21
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -10-
A.16. APPROVE RESOLUTION FOR SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS F OR WHICH THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY IS ELIGIBLE (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 202 2-77 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, approving the submittal of applications f or all CalRecycle grants for which the City of Moreno Valley is eligible. CalRecycle requires an updated Resolution every five (5) years.

A.17. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS TO ANSER ADVISORY

MANAGEMENT, LLC AND WILLDAN ENGINEERING FOR
CONSTRUCTION I NSPECTION CONSULTANT SERVICES (Report of:

Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Approve each Agreement for Professional Consultant Services with Anser Advisory Management, LLC (Anser), and Willdan Engineering (Willdan) to provide construction inspection consultant services for the Land Development Division.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute each Agreement for Professional Consultant Services with Anser and Willdan for $125,000.00 each, for six months in Fiscal Year 2022/2023 and $250,000.00 for each, annual ly thereafter; and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in accordance with approved terms of the agreement. Agreements funded by inspection fees collected from developers and utility companies.

3. Authorize the issuance of purchase orders to Anser and Willdan in the amount of $125,000.00 each, for six months in Fiscal Year 2022/2023 and authorize the Chief Financial Officer to approve subsequent related purchase order s f or annual extensions up to a maximum of four annual extensions with Anser and Willdan not -to-exceed $250,000.00 each, annually, in accordance with the approved terms of the Agreement.

4. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to make any necessary budget adjustment appropriations related to expenditures and offsetting revenues.

A.18. AUTHORIZATION OF CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE AGREEMENTS FOR VENDORS CONTRACTED ON THE STATE ROUTE 60/ MORENO
A.2
Packet Pg. 22
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -11-
BEACH INTERCHANGE PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 801 0021. (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Authorize the City Manager to amend the agreements for vendors contracted on the State Route 60/ Moreno Beach Interchange Phase 2 Improvements Project, Project No. 801 0021, subject to the approval by the City Attorney; and

2. Authorize Chief Financial Officer to make any budget adjustment s necessary based on amended agreements as long as the budget adjustments are reflected in the following quarterly budget review to Council.

A.19. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MO RENO VALLEY SERVING AS THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY APPROVING THE

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2023
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 (ROPS 23 -24) (RESO. NO. SA 2022-07) (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendations: That the City Council as Successor Agency:

1. Adopt Resolution No. SA 2022-07. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, serving as Successo r Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley Approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget for the Period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (ROPS 23 -24), and Authorizing the City Manager a cting for the Successor Agency or his/her Designee to Make Modifications Thereto.

2. Authorize the City Manager acting for the Successor Agency or his Designee to make modifications to the Schedule.

3. Authorize the transmittal of the ROPS 23 -24, for the perio d of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (“Exhibit A”), including Administrative Budget (“Exhibit B”) for the said period, to the Countywide Oversight Board for County of Riverside for review and approval.

A.20. APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PR OFESSIONAL

SERVICES FOR CITYWIDE GENERAL NUISANCE ABATEMENT
SERVICES (AGMT NO. 2019 -119) (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
A.2
Packet Pg. 23
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -12-
Recommendations:

1. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for professional services with Inland Empire Property Service, Inc;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement for professional services with Inland Empire Property Service for citywide general nuisance and hazard abatement services;

3. Authorize an increase in the Purchase Order fo r I nland Empire Property Services, Inc. in the amount of $275,000 for a total not -to- exceed of $775,000 once the First Amendment has been signed by all parties; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related extensions or Amendments to t he Agreement, including the authority to authorize associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, subject to approval of the City Attorney and the approved budget by City Council.

A.21. AUTHORIZE AN AGREEMENT WITH MIRACLE RECRE ATION

EQUIPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF

PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR PARQUE AMISTAD AND HIDDEN
SPRINGS PARK (PROJECT NO. 807 0004 50 57 -3016). (Report of: Parks & Community Services)
Recommendations:

1. Authorize an agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for the purchase and installation of Miracle Playground Equipment for Parque Amistad and Hidden Springs Park.

2. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for an amount up to $ 422,787.85 (bid a mount plus a 10% contingency) upon full execution of the agreement.

3. Authorize the Executive Director to execute the Agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment and any subsequent related Extensions or Amendments to the Agreement and change orders to the contract, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

A.22. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT TO THE CITY USER FEE SCHEDULE – PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES FEE FOR
2023 (Report of: Parks & Community Services)
A.2
Packet Pg. 24
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -13-
Recommendation:

1. That the City Council adopt Resolution 2022 -78 approving a CPI adjustment to the Parks and Community Services User Fees.

A.23. PEN19-0244 (TR 33436) – APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLO OD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT, THE CITY, AND KB HOME COASTAL, INC., FOR THE SUNNYMEAD MDP LINE Q -3, STAGE 4, LOCATED ON

IRONWOOD AVENUE WEST OF LASSELLE STREET AND LASSELLE

STREET FROM IRONWOOD AVENUE TO KALMIA AVENUE
DEVELOPER: KB HOME COASTAL, INC. (Report of: Public Works) Recommendations:

1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the District), the City of Moreno Valley (the City), and KB Home Coastal, Inc. (the Developer), for the Sunnymead MDP Line Q-3, Stage 4;

2. Authorize the City Manager , or designee, to execute the Cooperative Agreement and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney; and

3. Direct the City Clerk to forward the signed Cooperativ e Agreement to the District.

A.24. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO PUB CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE JUAN BAUTISTA DE ANZA MULTI -USE TRAIL ATP -4, FROM THE MORENO VALLEY MALL TO IRIS AVE,
PROJECT NO. 801 0086 (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -79, rejecting apparent low bidder as non - responsive and awarding a construction contract to lowest responsive and responsible bidder PUB Construction Inc. for the Juan Bautista de Anza Multi -Use Trail AT P-4 from the Mo reno Valley Mall to Iris Avenue, Project No. 801 0086 and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract in substantial conformance with the attached contract in the amount of $5,949,539.00, and authorize the City Manager to approve and execute any subse quent amendments subject to the approval of the City Attorney;

2. Award an agreement for Professional Consultant Service to TKE Engineering, Inc. to provide construction management and inspection services for the Juan Bautista de Anza Multi -Use Trail AT P-4, from A.2
Packet Pg. 25
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -14-
the Moreno Valley Mall to Iris Avenue, Project No. 801 0086 project and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any subsequent amendments with TKE Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $325,645.00;

3. Award an agreement for Professional Con sultant Service to RMA Group to provide material testing and geotechnical services for the Juan Bautista de Anza Multi-Use Trail ATP-4, from the Moreno Valley Mall to Iris Avenue, Project No. 801 0086 project and authorize the City Manager to execute the a greement and any subsequent amendments with RMA Group in the amount of $93,800.00;

4. Approve the First Amendment to KOA Corporation to provide Landscape Design and Design Support Services during construction for the Juan Bautista de Anza Multi -Use Trail fro m M oreno Valley Mall to Iris Avenue; authorize the First Amendment to extend the termination date from December 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023; and authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to Agreement and any subsequent amendments with KOA Cor poration in the amount of $22,247.50;

5. Approve the Fourth Amendment to the On -Call Agreement for Professional Civil Engineer/Project Manager services with CAV Consulting for various CIP projects including this project and authorize the City Manager to exec ute the Fourth Amendment to Agreement and any subsequent amendments with CAV Consulting;

6. Authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order to PUB Construction Inc. in the amount of $6,544,492.90 (bid amount plus a 10% contingency), a Purchase Order to TKE Engin eering, Inc. in the amount of $325,645.00, and a Purchase Order to RMA Group in the amount of $93,800.00, necessary for completing the construction of this project, funded by Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 2301);

7. Approve the change order to the existi ng Purchase Order for KOA Corporation in the amount $22,247.50, funded by Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 2301) for a not -to-exceed Purchase Order total amount of $505,071.50 once the Amendment has been signed by all parties;

8. Approve the change order to the existing Purchase Order for CAV Consulting in the amount $100,000, funded by Gas Tax Fund (Fund 2000), for a not -to-exceed Purchase Order total amount of $574,500.00 once the Amendment has been signed by all parties; and

9. Authorize the Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute any A.2
Packet Pg. 26
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -15-
subsequent change orders to PUB Construction Inc. contract not exceeding the contingency of $594,953.90, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

A.25. APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ON -

CALL PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WITH CASC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. FOR THE SEVEN LOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, APN 481 -270-058 (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for On-Call Professional Consultant Services for Environmental Assessment with CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (CASC, Inc.), to perform Final Design and Environmental Clearance, for the Seven Lot Affordable Housing project, APN 481 -270-058, funded wi th Housing Authority funds (Fund 8884);

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement and any subsequent amendments for On -Site and/or Professional Services (Design Professional Services) with CASC, Inc., subject to the approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize an amendment to the existing Purchase Order with CASC, Inc. in the amount of up to but not to exceed $164,870.00 ($50,000.00 for the original Agreement, $0 for the First Amendment, plus $114,870.00 for the Second Amendment to agreement) once the Agreement has been signed by all parties; and

4. Authorize a budget adjustment as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.

B. CONSENT CALENDAR-COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
B.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

B.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING -NOV 1, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.2).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

B.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - NOV 1, 2022 4:30 PM (SEE A.3).

A.2
Packet Pg. 27
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -16-
Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

B.4. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING -NOV 15, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.4).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

B.5. PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) - AMENDMENT NOs. 50 -55, 57, 61 (RESO. NOS. CSD 2022-71 to CSD 2022-78) (Report of: Financial & Management Services) Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -71, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 50) (Amelia Ramirez Mendoza, located at 15330 Theresa Ave.).

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -72, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the C ity of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 51) (Trinidad Juarez, located at 24 707 Carolyn Ave.).

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -73, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 52) (Raul and Maria Mendoza, located at 14138 Blue Ribbon Ln.).

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -74, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 53) (Mor eno V alley M.O.B. , located north of Eucalyptus Ave. between Day St. and Memorial Way).

5. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -75, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno A.2
Packet Pg. 28
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -17-
Valley, California, ordering the annexat ion o f territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 54) (Mercedes Lazaro Catalan Ma and David Flores Lazaro, located at 25702 Dandelion Ct.).

6. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -76, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 55) (Wagih Sewiha and Nagwa Mikhaeil , located at 24708 Patrician Ct.).

7. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -77, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services Distri ct of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 57) (Nayeli Velasco, located at 24576 Qualton Ct.).

8. Adopt Resolution No. 2022 -78, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilit ies D istrict No. 2021 -01 ( Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 61) (Ruben Pelayo, located at 13622 Persimmon Rd.).

C. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING AUTHORITY
C.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

C.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - NOV 1, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.2).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

C.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - NOV 1, 2022 4:30 PM (SEE A.3).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

A.2
Packet Pg. 29
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -18-
C.4. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING -NOV 15, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.4).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR - BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES
D.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

D.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - NOV 1, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.2).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

D.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - NOV 1, 2022 4:30 PM (SEE A.3).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

D.4. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING -NOV 15, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.4).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
E.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUD ES WAIVER OF FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

E.2. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - NOV 1, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.2).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

E.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - NOV 1, 2022 4:30 PM (SEE A.3).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

E.4. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING -NOV 15, 2022 6:00 PM (SEE A.4).

Recommendation: Approve as submitted.

A.2
Packet Pg. 30
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -19-
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS

Questions or comments from the public on a P ublic Hearing matter are limited to five minutes per individual and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to speak should complete and submit a GOLDENROD speaker slip to the Sergeant-at-Arms.

F.1. PEN20-0162 Moreno Business Center (Report of: Community Development) Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022 -80, attached hereto, DENYING Appeals PAA22-0002 and PAA22-0003,
AND:

1. ADOPTING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Plot Plan PEN20-0162 (PEN21-0079) on file with the Community Development Department, incorporated herein by this reference, which was completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and reflects that the Planning Commission and City reviewed and considered t he informat ion contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and exercised its independent judgment and analysis of the proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts; and

2. ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project, which consists of Plot Plan PEN20 -0162 (PEN21-0079) pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-80 attached hereto,
AND:

1. APPROVING Plot Plan PEN20 -0162 (PEN21-0079) based on the Recital, Evidence contained in th e Administr ative Records, and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-81.

RESULT: APPROVED [3 TO 2]
MOVER: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member
SECONDER: Ed Delgado, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Ed Delgado, Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez NAYS: David Marquez, Ulises Cabrera
Charles L. Smith

1. Supported
Jeff Sims
A.2
Packet Pg. 31
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -20-

2. Opposed
Efrain Lopez

1. Supported
David Zeitz

1. Opposed
Bianca Blua

1. Opposed
Elizabeth Sena

1. Opposed
Bob Palomarez

1. Supported
Gabriela Mendez

1. Opposed
Jovanny Aguilera

1. Opposed
Amparo Munoz

1. Opposed
George Hague

1. Opposed
Angel Ramirez

1. Opposed
Louise Palomarez

1. Supported
Roy Bleckert

1. Supported
JoAnn Stephan
A.2
Packet Pg. 32
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -21-

1. Supported

*Mayor Gutierrez left the meeting.

F.2. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMEN T NO. 3 TO THE 2019 -2020 AN NUAL ACTION PLAN CARES (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. Conduct a Public Hearing to allow public comment on the proposed Substantial Amendment No. 3 to the 2019 -2020 Annual Act ion Plan CARES Act Amendment.

2. Review and adopt the proposed Substantial Amendment No. 3 to the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan CARES Act Amendment.

3. Authorize a budget amendment as set forth in the fiscal impact section and authorize the Chief Financial Offi cer to reduce/de-obligate grant funds from previously awarded HUD funds.

RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 0]
MOVER: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member
SECONDER: Ed Delgado, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Ed Delgado, Elena Baca -Santa Cruz, David Marquez, Ulises Cabrera
AWAY: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez
F.3. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE FIVE -YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR PROGRAM YEARS 2023 -2028 AND THE ANNUAL ACTION (Report of:

Financial & Management Services)
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. Conduct a Public Hearing to allow for the public to comment on the needs of low-and-moderate income residents in Moreno Valley.

2. Approve the proposed CDBG, HOME, and ESG Grant Objectives and Policies for the 2023-2024 Program Year.

RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 0]
MOVER: Ulises Cabrera, Council Member
SECONDER: David Marquez, Council Member
AYES: Ed Delgado, Elena Baca -Santa Cruz, David Marquez, Ulises Cabrera
AWAY: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez

A.2
Packet Pg. 33
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -22-
G. GENERAL BUSINESS

None.

H. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDARS FOR DISCUSSION OR

SEPARATE ACTION

None.

I. REPORTS

I.1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS

(Informational Oral Presentation - not for Council action)

March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
Mayor Pro Tem Delgado reported the following:

The Commission authorized the Executive Director to sig n the grant deed for the 17th Option Parcel related to the West March DDA.

The Commission also heard an update from the executive director of the Air and Marines Operations Center.

Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)
None.

Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Mayor Pro Tem Delgado reported the following:

At the November 9th Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting the Commission heard a presentation regarding the Interstate 15 Smart Freeway Improvements Project and then awarded an agreement t o Anser Advisory Management, LLC for construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying.

A.2
Packet Pg. 34
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -23-
The Commission also heard the state and federal legislative updates from David Knudsen of the Budget and Implementation Committee.

At th e November 28th meeting, the Commission discussed the comprehensive on -call consultant services related to various environmental and archaeological services. The Committee heard a presentation regarding the procurement proce ss and recommended th e Commissio n to award the agreements to four (4) companies.

Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
Council Member Marquez reported the following:

At the November 2 nd Committee meeting the Committee heard a report regarding Low Carbon Transi t Operations Program (LCTOP) an d approved the transfer of FY19 LCTOP funds and FY20 LCTOP funds to the FY22 LCTOP Implementation of Fare Promotions Project. The Committee also approved the implementation of the $5 monthly pass promotion in the December 2022 and January 2023 or longer depending on program usage and funding availability.

At the November 2nd Committee meeting the Committee heard a presentation regarding Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22) independent financial audit and accepted the RTA FY22 Basic Financial Statements.

The Board al so decided to hold its monthly meeting virtually in December 2022.

Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
Mayor Pro Tem Delgado reported the following:

At the November 7, 2022 WRCOG Executive Committee meeting, the committee approved the revis ed 2022 TUMF Central Zone 5 -Year Transportation A.2
Packet Pg. 35
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -24-
Improvement Program. The Central Zone includes the Cities of Menifee, Moreno Valley, Perris, and the County of Riverside (District 5).

The items covered at the December 5, 202 2 meeting included up dates on a number of continuing business items; however, there are no major items to report on.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Council Member Marquez reported the following:

The items covered at the R CA Board of Directors meeting on December 5, 2022 includes the September 2022 MSHCP fee collections which identifies that Moreno Valley’s MSHCP fee collections for August 2022 were pending at the time the report was prepared.

The Items covered at the RCA Board of Directors meeting on November 7, 2022 include:

The August 2022 MSHCP fee collections report stated the following, per month:
• June 2022 totaled $61,795
• July 2022 totaled $152,958
I.2. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS

None.

I.3. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

None.

CLOSING COMMENTS AND/OR REPORTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, HOUSING AUTHORITY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND THE BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES.

A.2
Packet Pg. 36
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -25-
Council Member Marquez

1. City Tree Lighting and Snow Day

2. Moreno Valley Animal Shelter

3. 2022 Election

4. Citywide pavement project

5. MVUSD Ribbon Cutting
Council Member Cabrera

1. City Tree Lighting and Snow Day

2. Bloomberg Philanthropies Program

3. 2022 Election

4. Special Meeting

5. Thanked City residents
Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz

1. City Tree Lighting and Snow Day

2. DIF fees

3. Moreno Valley Animal Shelter

4. 2022 Election

5. December 20th City Council Meeting
Mayor Pro Tem Delgado

1. 2022 Election

2. Thanked District 2 residents

3. Thanked City staff

4. Shared motivation for being on the City Council

A.2
Packet Pg. 37
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -26-

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Delgado adjourned the meeting at 8:44 p.m.

PUBLIC INSPECTION

The contents of the agenda packet are available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

Any written inform ation related to an ope n session a genda item that is known by the City to have been distributed to all or a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to this meeting will be made available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City C lerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

Submitted by:

___________________________
Jane Halstead, CMC
City Clerk
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority

Approved by:

___________________________
Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
A.2
Packet Pg. 38
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -1-

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 PM
December 6, 2022

CALL TO ORDER

The Closed Session of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Mor eno Valley, Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority was called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Mayor Gutierrez in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California.

Mayor Gutierrez announced that the Ci ty Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

ROLL CALL

Council: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez
Edward A. Delgado
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz
David Marquez
Ulises Cabrera

Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS ON THE AGENDA ONLY

Mayor Gutierrez opened the public comments portion of the meeting for items listed on the agenda only. There being no members of the public to come forward to speak, he closed the public comments.

A.3
Packet Pg. 39
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 4:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -2-

CLOSED SESSION

Interim City Attorney Quintanilla annou nced that the City Council would recess to Closed Session to discuss the item as listed on the agenda and that he did not anticipate any reportable action.

A CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant Government Code Section 54956.9
Case Name: Sierra Club et al. v. City of Moreno Valley
Case No.: Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVR12103300

B CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
Case N ame Unspecified since disclosu re would jeopardize settlement negotiations

Mayor Gutierrez recessed the City Council to the City Manager's Conference Room, second floor, City Hall, for their Closed Session at 4:35 p.m.

Mayor Gutierrez reconvened the Cit y Council in the Council Chamb er from their Closed Session at 5:30 p.m.

REPORT OF ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION, IF ANY, BY CITY ATTORNEY Interim City Attorney Quintanilla announced that there was no reportable action taken in Closed Session.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further busin ess to come before the City Council, Mayor Gutierrez adjourned the meeting at 5:27 p.m.

A.3
Packet Pg. 40
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 4:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL) -3-
Submitted by:

Approved by:

___________________________
Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
A.3
Packet Pg. 41
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Dec 6, 2022 4:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR-CITY COUNCIL)

Report to City Council

ID#6046 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of the
Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)

FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services Director

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: SPECIAL EVENTS CALENDAR 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

Receive and file the Special Events Calendar 2023.

SUMMARY

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Special Events Calendar 2023. This was pub lished on the Parks and Community Services Subcommittee agenda last month.

DISCUSSION

To keep Council best informed of citywide events, staff has prepared a Special Events calendar and will begin the planning stages for year 2023. This was published on the Parks and Community Services Subcommittee agenda last month.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Receive and file as presented in this staff report.

2. Do not receive and file as presented and provide direction to staff.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no direct impact to the General Fund.

A.4
Packet Pg. 42

Page 2 ends

NOTIFICATION

Posting of the agenda

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Jeremy Bubnick Jeremy Bubnick
Parks and Community Services Director Parks and Community Services Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

Objective 5.5: Promote a healthy community and lifestyle.

Objective 6.2: Improve health, wellness and fitness for Moreno Valley youth through recreation and sports programs.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Calendar of Events 2023

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 5:46 PM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

A.4
Packet Pg. 43

Page 3 ends

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/14/22 9:01 AM A.4
Packet Pg. 44
** NEW EVENTS FOR 2023
March Events Day Date Time Location
** ART AND FOOD TRUCK FESTIVAL Saturday March 11, 2023 11am-5pm Civic Center Amphitheater April Events Day Date Time Location
SPRINGTASTIC Saturday April 1, 2023 9am-11:30am Sunnymead Park ** ADULT FLASHLIGHT EGG SCRAMBLE (HUNT) Saturday April 1, 2023 8pm (Gates Open at 6:30pm) Lasselle Sports Park ** EARTH DAY Saturday April 22, 2023 9am-1pm Civic Center Amphitheater May Events Day Date Time Location
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPO Saturday May 20, 2023 10am-2pm Calle San Juan Los Lagos June Events Day Date Time Location
JUNETEENTH Saturday June 17, 2023 1pm-5pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL ROCKS-SUMMER CONCERT Thursday June 29, 2023 7pm-9pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL MOVIES-SUMMER MOVIE SERIES Friday June 30, 2023 7pm -10pm Civic Center Amphitheater July Events Day Date Time Location
4th OF JULY PARADE Tuesday July 4, 2023 9:30am N Frederick St. beginning at Alessandro Blvd. 4th OF JULY FUNFEST Tuesday July 4, 2023 2pm-9:30pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL ROCKS-SUMMER CONCERT Thursday July 13, 2023 7pm-9pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL MOVIES-SUMMER MOVIE SERIES Friday July 14, 2023 7pm -10pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL ROCKS-SUMMER CONCERT Thursday July 20, 2023 7pm-9pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL MOVIES-SUMMER MOVIE SERIES Friday July 21, 2023 7pm -10pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL ROCKS-SUMMER CONCERT Thursday July 27, 2023 7pm-9pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL MOVIES-SUMMER MOVIE SERIES Friday July 28, 2023 7pm -10pm Civic Center Amphitheater August Events Day Date Time Location
NATIONAL NIGHT OUT Tuesday August 1, 2023 4pm-8pm Celebration Park MOVAL ROCKS-SUMMER CONCERT Thursday August 3, 2023 7pm-9pm Civic Center Amphitheater MOVAL MOVIES-SUMMER MOVIE SERIES Friday August 4, 2023 7pm-10pm Civic Center Amphitheater September Events Day Date Time Location
EL GRITO Friday September 15, 2023 6pm-10pm Civic Center Amphitheater October Events Day Date Time Location
DAY OF THE DEAD Friday October 27, 2023 6pm-10pm Civic Center Amphitheater November Events Day Date Time Location
** COLOR FUN RUN Saturday November 4, 2023 8am-12pm TBD December Events Day Date Time Location
SNOW DAY Saturday December 2, 2023 9am-4:45pm Civic Center Amphitheater HOLIDAY TREE LIGHTING Saturday December 2, 2023 5:30pm City Hall REVISED 12/13/2022
2023 Special Event
Calendar
A.4.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Calendar of Events 2023 (6046 : SPECIAL EVENTS CALENDAR 2023)

Report to City Council

ID#6045 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Brian Mohan, Assistant City Manager

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

DISCUSSION

The attached list of personnel changes scheduled since the last City Council meeting is presented for City Council ratification.

Staffing of City positions ensures assignment of highly qualified and trained personnel to achieve Momentum MoVal priorities, objectives and initiatives.

FISCAL IMPACT

All position changes are consistent with appropriations previously approved by the City Council.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Serina Astorga Brian Mohan
Executive Assistant Assistant City Manager
Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None

A.5
Packet Pg. 46

Page 2 ends

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Personnel Changes_12.20.22

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/09/22 9:46 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 12:55 PM A.5
Packet Pg. 47
City of Moreno Valley
Personnel Changes- 11/1/22- 11/30/22
December 20, 2022
New Hires
Melinda Barragan, Animal Services Assistant, Animal Services, Community Development Department Alexander Guardado, Maintenance Worker I, Maintenance & Operations, Public Works Promotions
Dan Monto
From: Landscape Services Supervisor, Parks Maintenance, Parks & Community Services Department To: Parks & Landsca pe Services Division Manager, Parks Maintenance , Parks & Community Services Department
Claudia Torres
From: Community Services Supervisor, Community Services, Parks & Community Services Department To: Special Even ts & Facilities Division Mana ger, Community Services, Parks & Community Services Department
Transfers
NONE
Separations
Joseph Baker, Community Services Coordinator, Community Services, Parks and Community Services Department
Kathryn Bray , Human Resou rces Technician, Human Resources, Financia l and Managem ent Service s department
Daniel Bustamante, Payroll Supervisor, Payroll, Financial and Management Services Department Mindy Davis, Principal Planner, Planning, Community Development Department Audie Estrada, Maintenance Worker II, Maintenance and Operations, Public Works Gail Smerkol, Management Assistant, Capital Projects, Public Works Department Socorro Huerta, Community Services Superintendent, Community Service s, Parks & Community Services Department
Tammy Brooks, Senior Administrative Assistant, Animal Services, Community Development Department A.5.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Personnel Changes_12.20.22 (6045 : LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES)

Report to City Council

ID#6044 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Manuel A. Mancha, Community Development Director

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS
WITH ADVANCED APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC., DBA
INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS, AND 4LEAF, INC., FOR

PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN AS
NEEDED BASIS (AGMTS NO. 2022 -30-01 AND 2022 -31-
01)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Planning Consultant Services on an As Needed Basis with Advanced Applied Engin eering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers, and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment , and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and available budget as previously approved by Council; and

2. Authorize an increase of $150,000.00 to the amount of the Agreement with Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers, to $200,000.00, funded by fees paid by project applicants. Authorize the Purchasing Division Manager to approve a cha nge order to increase Purchase Order #2023 - 505 to Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers; and

3. Approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Planning Consultant Services on an As Needed Basis with 4Leaf, Inc., and authorize the Ci ty Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment, and any subsequent amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and available budget as previously approved by Council; and

4. Authorize an increase of $150,000.00 to the amount of the Agreem ent with 4Leaf, Inc., to $200,000.00, funded by fees paid by project applicants. Authorize A.6
Packet Pg. 49

Page 2 ends

the Purchasing Division Manager to approve a change order to increase Purchase Order #2023-504 to 4Leaf, Inc.; and

5. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer, or his de signee, to make the appropriate budget adjustments as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.

SUMMARY

This report recommends approval of the First Amendments to the Agreements for Planning Consultant Services on an As Needed Basis with Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers, and 4Leaf, Inc. Additional consultant costs will be fully offset by fees collected on applications.

The Amendments will increase the amounts of the City’s Agreement by $150,000.00 up to $200,000.00 for Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers , and by $150,000.00 up to $200,000.00 for 4Leaf, Inc., and allow for continued use of consultant services through the end of FY23/24.

The new amounts of these Agreements will inc rease the existing Purchase Orders, as needed, to cover the external planning entitlement and plan check service consultant costs.

DISCUSSION

The Planning Division initially entered into $50,000.00 contracts with Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA I nfrastructure Engineers and 4Leaf, Inc., for assistance with entitlement activities as the Division is seeing the largest number of new applications being submitted in well over a decade. External planning entitlement and plan check services are necessary as the continued, high demand for application processing plan check services is expected to continue over the term of the Agreements.

Consultant services in the Planning Division are used to augment internal staffing resources, particularly during heavy workload periods, to ensure timely entitlement application processing, environmental review, and overall customer service.

The requested $300,000 increase and budget adjustment is to cover increased entitlement and plan check services, and will allow the Division to meet current and projected expenditure and revenue levels through FY23/24. Funds allocated are recovered from fees paid by project applicants.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff report . This alternate is recommended by staff as it continues the existing level of professional and timely development services to deliver high-quality development projects.

A.6
Packet Pg. 50

Page 3 ends

2. Do not approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff report . This alternative is not recomme nded by staff and would cause delays at all levels of the entitlement process for development projects.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no additional impact projected for the General Fund. Additional consultant costs will be fully offset by fees collected on applications.

The following sets forth the recommended revenue and expenditure budget adjustments:

Description Fund GL Account
Project Number Type
FY22/23
Amended
Budget
FY22/23
Proposed
Adjustment
FY22/23
Revised
Budget
Planning Fees General
Fund
1010-20-27-20211-525000 REV $1,800,000 $ 300,000 $2,100,000 Contractual Svcs - Other General
Fund
1010-20-27-20211-625099 EXP $565,000 $ 300,000 $ 865,000

NOTIFICATION

Publication of the Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Sean Kelleher Manuel A. Mancha
Planning Official Community Development Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal pol icies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
A.6
Packet Pg. 51

Page 4 ends

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. First Amendment to Agreement - 4Leaf

2. First Amendment to Agreement - Adv Appl Eng

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 5:58 PM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/14/22 8:56 AM A.6
Packet Pg. 52

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) The First Amendment to Agreement is by and between the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and 4LEAF, INC., hereinafter referred to as “Consultant.” This First Amendment to Agreement is made and entered into effective on the date the City signs this Amendment.

RECITALS:

Whereas, the City and Consultant entered into an Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)” hereinafter referred to as “Agreement,” dated April 1, 2022.

Whereas, the Consultant is providing Planning consultant services on an as-needed basis.

Whereas, it is desirable to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the Consultant’s “not-exceed” fee as is more particularly described in Section 1 of this First Amendment.

SECTION 1 AMENDMENT TO ORIGINAL AGREEMENT:

1.1 The Agreement termination date of June 30, 2023 is extended by this Amendment to June 30, 2024.

1.2 The total “Not-to-Exceed” fee for this contract is $200,000.00 ($50,000.00 for the original Agreement plus $150,000 for this First Amendment) pursuant to Exhibit “C” of the original agreement.

SECTION 2

2.1 Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 3

3.1 In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Amendment or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Amendment, the prevailing party in such suit or proceeding shall A.6.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - 4Leaf (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)

be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including re asonable attorney's fees, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.

SECTION 4

4.1 This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the Parties when at least a copy hereof shall have been signed by the Parties hereto.

All electronic signatures shall be deemed to be one and the same as original signatures.

SECTION 5

5.1 In the event there exists any conflicts between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall be superseding.

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
A.6.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - 4Leaf (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.

City of Moreno Valley 4LEAF, Inc.

By:

Mike Lee, City Manager

Date:

By:

Title:
(President of Vice President)
Date:

By:

Title:

(Corporate Secretary)

Date:

INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney

Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Department Head

Date
A.6.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - 4Leaf (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) The First Amendment to Agreement is by and between the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and ADVANCED APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC, DBA INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS , hereinafter referred to as “Consultant.” This First Amendment to Agreement is made and entered into effective on the date the City signs this Amendment.

RECITALS:

Whereas, the Consultant is providing Planning consultant services on an as-needed basis.

SECTION 1 AMENDMENT TO ORIGINAL AGREEMENT:

1.1 The Agreement termination date of June 30, 2023 is extended by this Amendment to June 30, 2024.

1.2 The total “Not-to-Exceed” fee for this contract is $200,000.00 ($50,000.00 for the original Agreement plus $150,000 for this Second Amendment) pursuant to Exhibit “C” of the original agreement.

SECTION 2

2.1 Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 3

3.1 In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Amendment or as a result of any alleged A.6.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - Adv Appl Eng (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)

breach of any provision of this Amendment, the prevailing party in such suit or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.

SECTION 4

All electronic signatures shall be deemed to be one and the same as original signatures.

SECTION 5

5.1 In the event there exists any conflicts between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall be superseding.

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
A.6.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - Adv Appl Eng (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.

City of Moreno Valley Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc., DBA Infrastructure Engineers

By:

Mike Lee, City Manager

Date:

By:

Title:
(President of Vice President)
Date:

By:

Title:

(Corporate Secretary)

Date:

INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney

Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Department Head

Date
A.6.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: First Amendment to Agreement - Adv Appl Eng (6044 : APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS WITH ADVANCED

Report to City Council

ID#6033 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Melissa Walker, Acting Public Work Director/City Engineer

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITH M. BREY ELECTRIC, INC. FOR

GENERAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES AT CITY
FACILITIES, TRAILS, AND PARKS.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for General Contractor Services with M. Brey Electric, Inc., to increase the contract value funded through Facilities Maintenance (Fund 7310), General Fund (Fund 1010), and PCS Capital Project Fund (Fund 3015) , which will increase responsiveness to on -call needs throughout the contract term.

2. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement for General Cont ractor Services with M. Brey Electric, Inc., to increase the contract amount by $2,000,000 for a total not -to-exceed amount of the five-year Agreement of $3,760,000.

3. Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Agreem ent, any subsequent future amendments, and Purchase Orders subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in accordance with approved terms of the agreement and within available budget previously approved by Council.

SUMMARY

This report recommends approva l of the First Amendment to the Agreement with M.

Brey Electric, Inc. to increase the previously approved Agreement amount by $2,000,000 to continue to provide general contractor services at all City Facilities, Trails, and Parks.

A.7
Packet Pg. 59

Page 2 ends

DISCUSSION

The City is responsible for ensuring that public facilities are safe and properly operational for the general public and employees, including fire stations, the Public Safety Building, and the Emergency Operations Center. Properly functioning and maintained facilitie s are an essential part of the City’s operations. Required General Contractor services range from routine maintenance items to emergency responses as several of the City’s buildings are operational 24 -hours per day. As such, the need for licensed on-call general contractor service providers, with the ability to perform a wide variety of scheduled maintenance and on-call emergency repair services, is critical.

Requests for Proposal to provide general contractor services to include all labor, equipment, mate rials, and performance of operation in connection with construction, repair, and maintenance services for City Facilities on an on -call basis went out for bid on August 30, 2021. Formal bidding procedures were followed in conformance with the Public Contract Code. Bids were received via the electronic bid management system, PlanetBids, by September 29, 2021, and two bids were received.

In a continued effort to ensure all public facilities are safely maintained and kept properly operational, staff is recomm ending increasing the agreement with M. Brey Electric, Inc. by $2,000,000 for a new not to exceed agreement of $3,76 0,000. The above amount is an estimate based on previous service and future needs, which may need to be increased in the future.

Approval o f the recommended actions would support Objective 4 of the Momentum MoVal Strategic Plan: “Manage and maximize Moreno Valley’s public Infrastructure to ensure an excellent quality of life, develop and implement innovative, cost -effective infrastructure mai ntenance programs, public facilities management strategies, and capital improvement programming and project delivery.”

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the First Amendment to the Agreement with M. Brey Electric, Inc. for General Contractor Services. This alternative will provide for the timely construction, repair, and maintenance services and is recommended by staff.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this Staff Report. This alternative will delay necessary construction, repair, and maintenance services and is not recommended by staff.

FISCAL IMPACT

Funding is available in the approved Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23. The amended not-to-exceed $3,760,000 contract will be expensed over the five -year term, based on services needed, subject to the City Council approval of future Operating Budget.

A.7
Packet Pg. 60

Page 3 ends

NOTIFICATION

N/A

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Tyler Smith Melissa Walker, P.E.

Management Analyst Acting Public Works Director / City Engineer

Concurred By:

Joseph Mattox
Maintenance & Operations Division Manager

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Advocacy. Develop cooperative intergovernmental relationships and be a forceful advocate of City policies, objectives, and goals to ap propriate external governments, agencies and corporations.

Public Safety. Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects . Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which wil l result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
A.7
Packet Pg. 61

Page 4 ends

To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. M. Brey Electric, Inc. First Amendment

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 6:06 PM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/14/22 9:00 AM A.7
Packet Pg. 62

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

The First Amendment to Agreement is by and between the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and M. BREY ELECTRIC, INC ., hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” This First Amendment to Agreement is made and entered into effective on December 1, 2022.

RECITALS:

Whereas, the City and Contractor entered into an Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT for On-Site and/or Professional Services,” hereinafter referred to as “Agreement,” dated November 16, 2021;
Whereas, the Contractor provides professional general contractor services to include all labor, equipment, materials, and performance of operation in connection with construction, repair and maintenance services;
Whereas, it is desirable to amend the A greement to increase the Contractor’s compensation by $2,000,000 and expand the Scope of Services as more specifically described in Section 1 of this amendment.

SECTION 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO ORIGINAL AGREEMENT:

1.1 The Agreement “Not -to-Exceed” amount is increased from $1,760,000 to $3,760,000.

1.2 The Scope of Services is expanded to include all City of Moreno Valley Parks and Community Services sites, parks, and trails.

SECTION 2

2.1 Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
A.7.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: M. Brey Electric, Inc. First Amendment (6033 : AUTHORIZE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH M. BREY ELECTRIC,

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.

City of Moreno Valley M.BREY ELECTRIC

By: ____________________________ By: __________________________ Mike Lee Matt Brey
City Manager President

Date: ______________________ Date: _________________________

INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
City Attorney

___________________________
Date

RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL:
___________________________
Melissa Walker, P.E.

Acting Public Works Director/City
Engineer

___________________________
Date

___________________________
Jeremy Bubnick
Parks and Community
Services Director

___________________________
Date

A.7.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: M. Brey Electric, Inc. First Amendment (6033 : AUTHORIZE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH M. BREY ELECTRIC,

Report to City Council

ID#6026 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Brian Mohan, Assistant City Manager

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: PAYMENT REGISTER - OCTOBER 2022

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the Payment Register.

SUMMARY

The Payment Register is an important report providing transparency of financial transactions and payments for City activity for review by the City Council and the residents and businesses in Moreno Valley. The report is posted to the City’s website as soon as it is available. The report is included in the City Council agenda as an additional means of distributing the report.

The payment register lists in alphabetical order all checks and wires in the amount of $25,000 or greater, followed by a listing in alphabetical order of al l checks and wires less than $25,000. The payment register also includes the fiscal year -to-date (FYTD) amount paid to each vendor.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Annabelle Wang Brian Mohan
Financial Operations Division Manager Assistant City Manager Chief Financial Officer Treasurer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None
A.8
Packet Pg. 65

Page 2 ends

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/09/22 8:33 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 12:55 PM A.8
Packet Pg. 66
Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC 34705 10/05/2022 20310427 RTU EMERGENCY COMPRESSOR REPLACEMENT-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG.
$25,956.00
$72,744.00Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, INC. 244329 10/19/2022 34571_01 $123,652.00 244359 10/26/2022 33507_7.2
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB PROG (FY 21-26)
JUAN BAUTISTA TRAIL ATP 2 $69,325.72
$572,071.53Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD:

CALPINE CORPORATION DBA

CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES
34869 10/19/2022 92959 RESOURCE ADEQUACY-SEPTEMBER 2022/MV UTILITY $105,400.00 $421,600.00Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD:

CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES,
INC
34872 10/19/2022 64756 PLAN CHECK SVCS-HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW/WLC-AUGUST 2022 $55,256.75 10/19/2022 64753 ENGINEERING SVCS-AUGUST 2022
10/19/2022 64755 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN19-0204-0205-AUGUST 2022 10/19/2022 64757 PLAN CHECK SVCS-NPDES/SWMP-AUGUST 2022 10/19/2022 64758 PLAN CHECK SVCS-WQMP REVIEW-AUGUST 2022 10/19/2022 64754 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR37909 PEN20-0063-AUGUST 2022 $165,075.00Remit to: MISSION VIEJO, CA FYTD:

CHRIS ALAN VOGT DBA CAV

CONSULTING
34934 10/26/2022 21038 PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTING SERVICES (CPD) $31,683.75 $156,650.75Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

CHRISP COMPANY 34935 10/26/2022 21848 IRONWOOD AVE & KITCHING ST $47,659.84 $47,659.84Remit to: FREMONT, CA FYTD:

Page 1 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

COMPULINK MANAGEMENT
CENTER, INC. - DBA LASERFICHE
34716 10/05/2022 5291 LASERFICHE CLOUD ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION-10/01/22 TO 09/20/23
$106,251.55
$106,251.55Remit to: LONG BEACH, CA FYTD:

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SHERIFF 34938 10/26/2022 SH0000041690 CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT BILLING #1 (7/1/22-7/27/22) $3,334,267.42 $15,348,820.23Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

DATA TICKET, INC. 34877 10/19/2022 143616 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-SEPTEMBER 2022 $31,488.93 10/19/2022 143683HH PARKING HANDHELD DEVICES LEASE-AIR TIME-CODE-SEPTEMBER 2022
10/19/2022 143616TPC ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-3RD PARTY COLLECTIONS-CODE- SEPT 2022
10/19/2022 143683 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/19/2022 143614 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-ANIMAL SVC-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/19/2022 142799 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-BLDG & SAFETY-AUGUST 2022 10/19/2022 141840TPC ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-3RD PARTY COLL-BLDG & SAFETY- JULY 22
10/19/2022 141840 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-BLDG & SAFETY-JULY 2022 10/19/2022 143614TPC ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-3RD PARTY COLL-ANIMAL SVCS- SEPT 2022
$115,605.70Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD:

E SOURCE COMPANIES LLC 34724 10/05/2022 21504 CONSULTING SERVICES-MV UTILITY/AUGUST 2022 $29,000.00 34879 10/19/2022 21591 CONSULTING SERVICES-MV UTILITY/SEPTEMBER 2022 $30,589.41 10/19/2022 21682 TRAVEL EXPENSES REIMB-ROB MARTIN
$123,820.40Remit to: BOULDER, CO FYTD:

Page 2 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER

DISTRICT
244260 10/05/2022 SEP-22 10/5/22 WATER CHARGES $71,856.28 10/05/2022 AUG-22 10/5/22 WATER CHARGES
244336 10/19/2022 SEP-22 10/19/22 WATER CHARGES $27,912.13 244364 10/26/2022 OCT-22 10/26/22 WATER CHARGES $189,220.34 10/26/2022 SEP-22 10/26/22 WATER CHARGES
$1,093,488.24Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

EC & AM ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA

GK & ASSOCIATES
34940 10/26/2022 22-083 PVT REHAB (CDBG FY 21/22) $55,241.50 10/26/2022 22-094 PVT REHAB (CDBG FY 21/22)
$55,241.50Remit to: DIAMOND BAR, CA FYTD:

Page 3 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
34726 10/05/2022 INV55945 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $1,078,031.23 10/05/2022 INV55870 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/05/2022 INV55849 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/05/2022 C22-13 GRAHAM ST-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT
10/05/2022 C22-12 N/E HEACOCK & ATWOOD-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT 10/05/2022 C22-11 FREDERICK ST-VEHICLE HIT STREETLIGHT
10/05/2022 INV55989 DISTRIBUTION CHARGES 8/19/22 - 9/15/22

Page 4 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
34881 10/19/2022 40-524A-02 WA# 40-524A-YUM YUM DONUTS STREETLIGHTS $61,056.10 10/19/2022 40-478B-07 WA# 40-478B-COURTYARDS AT COTTONWOOD STREETLIGHTS 10/19/2022 INV56174 METER FEES-DR HORTON
10/19/2022 INV56229 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/19/2022 40-433B-02 WA# 40-433B-PAMA BUSINESS PARK
10/19/2022 40-439A-12 WA# 40-439A-VIA DEL LAGO
10/19/2022 40-441B-02 WA# 40-441B-IRIS AVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING 10/19/2022 40-460B-10 WA# 40-460B-DR HORTON DEL SOL TRACT 31590-96 HOMES 10/19/2022 40-474A-10 WA# 40-474A-KB HOMES-MOOTHART 80 HOMES 10/19/2022 40-482B-10 WA# 40-482B-ASPEN HILLS 112 UNITS - TR 32142 10/19/2022 40-517-01 WA# 40-517-ATT STREETLIGHT UPGRADES FOR 1 ANTENNA

INSTALLATION
10/19/2022 40-486-12 WA# 40-486-ITRON FIELD HARDWARE INSTALLATION-

COMISSIONING
10/19/2022 40-501-2209 WA# 40-501-ACQUIRED SCE STREETLIGHTS MAINTENANCE 10/19/2022 40-492-08 WA# 40-492-IS5 NETWORK CYBER SECURITY 10/19/2022 40-506A-05 WA# 40-506A-ROCAS GRANDES APARTMENTS 10/19/2022 40-508-04 WA# 40-508-CYBER SECURITY MONITORING 10/19/2022 40-512A-04 WA# 40-512A-QUICK QUACK CAR WASH
10/19/2022 40-513A-04 WA# 40-513A-OLD FRONTAGE AND BAY AVE 10/19/2022 40-490B-02 WA# 40-490B-CACTUS COMMERCE - STARBUCKS 10/19/2022 40-476B-02 WA# 40-476B-ROSS GENERATOR PROJECT 10/19/2022 40-523A-03 WA# 40-523A-MV MARKETPLACE
10/19/2022 40-526-02 WA# 40-526-HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS
10/19/2022 INV56186 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/19/2022 INV56211 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/19/2022 40-515A-02 WA# 40-515A-JIFFY LUBE

Page 5 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
10/19/2022 40-489-03 WA# 40-489-MORENO VALLEY UTILITY SCADA ALARMS Payment Amount
10/19/2022 40-514A-04 WA# 40-514A-SKYLER PLACE - TR 38123 177 SFR $4,096,643.06Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS

CONSULTING, LLC
34882 10/19/2022 MVU-2022-10 CONSULTING SVCS-MV UTILITIES $45,951.57 $149,159.73Remit to: WEBSTER, NY FYTD:

EXELON GENERATION COMPANY,
LLC
34727 10/05/2022 828266 POWER PURCHASE-8/01-8/31/22 $967,209.36 34883 10/19/2022 834741 POWER PURCHASE-9/01-9/30/22 $821,060.00 $3,545,363.92Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

FEHR & PEERS 34797 10/12/2022 158735 MV LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN $52,345.40 $125,851.54Remit to: WALNUT CREEK, CA FYTD:

FH II HOMEBUILDERS INC. 244382 10/26/2022 PROJ. PEN18-0092 REFUND GRADING & EROSION CONTROL SECURITY DEPOSITS (TR 37544)
$73,820.00
$73,820.00Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD:

Page 6 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
GREENTECH LANDSCAPE, INC. 34804 10/12/2022 54012 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 $51,819.59 10/12/2022 53997 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54014 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54015 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54016 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/12/2022 54013 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 06 10/12/2022 54005 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54004 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 53842 SD LANDSCAPE AUG. BASE (SOUTH) ZONE E-8, 03, 03A, 04, 05, 06, 07
10/12/2022 54011 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 10/12/2022 54010 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 07 10/12/2022 54009 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 10/12/2022 54007 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 10/12/2022 54006 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 53998 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54017 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/12/2022 53995 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54002 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 10/12/2022 54001 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 54000 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 05 10/12/2022 53987 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/12/2022 53999 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (WEST) ZONE 08 10/12/2022 54003 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 53996 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 04 10/12/2022 53994 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (SOUTH) ZONE 03 10/12/2022 53993 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/12/2022 53992 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D

Page 7 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
GREENTECH LANDSCAPE, INC. 10/12/2022 53989 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/12/2022 53988 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK (VALLEY) ZONE D 34887 10/19/2022 54089 LANDSCAPE MAINT-SEPTEMBER 2022
Payment Amount
$69,975.05
10/19/2022 54088 SD LANDSCAPE SEPT. BASE ZONE E-8, 03, 03A, 04, 05, 06, 07 10/19/2022 54090 SD LANDSCAPE SEPT. BASE (VALLEY) ZONE D 10/19/2022 54087 SD LANDSCAPE SEPT. BASE (WEST) ZONE 01, 01A, 08, & E-7 $350,361.22Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

RIVERSIDE
34734 10/05/2022 CHR21 - INV13 HOME-CRITICAL HOME REPAIR PROGRAM-JULY 2022 $37,869.98 10/05/2022 CHR21 - INV14 HOME-CRITICAL HOME REPAIR PROGRAM-AUGUST 2022 $75,217.32Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

HR GREEN PACIFIC INC. 34736 10/05/2022 155851 801 0089 CITYWIDE PVT REHAB FY 21/22 $65,893.75 $388,849.45Remit to: DES MOINES, IA FYTD:

INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
211+
34864 10/06/2022 W221005 ERAP1 REALLOCATION ROUND 3 FUNDS DRAW #1 $425,768.00 $425,768.00Remit to: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FYTD:

JOHNSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY 34890 10/19/2022 8062 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT BUILD-OUT-POLICE $34,753.51 $34,753.51Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD:

LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES,
LLC
34893 10/19/2022 INV6348 LIBRARY CONTRACT SVCS & MATERIALS-MAIN/MALL/IRIS- OCTOBER 2022
$201,418.07
$836,725.48Remit to: ROCKVILLE, MD FYTD:

Page 8 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
LYONS SECURITY SERVICE, INC. 34818 10/12/2022 30049 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CONF & REC CTR-SEPTEMBER 2022 $25,001.05 10/12/2022 30081 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CONF & REC CTR-EL GRITO 9/15/22 10/12/2022 30048 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-COTTONWOOD SPECIAL EVENT 10/12/2022 30050 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CONF & REC CTR-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30051 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-ERC-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30053 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-SENIOR CENTER-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30054 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-TOWNGATE-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30047 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-COMMUNITY PARK-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30046 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-CITY HALL-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 30052 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-LIBRARY-SEPTEMBER 2022 $124,465.71Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

Page 9 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 34748 10/05/2022 98648 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL-JUL. 2022 $27,690.48 10/05/2022 98653 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/FAY TO GENTIAN-JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 98654 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AMPHITHEATER FACILITY-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98847 LANDSCAPE SERVICES-SD LMD ZONE 02-JULY ADDITIONAL WORK 10/05/2022 98849 SD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE (ZONE 02) FY22/23 10/05/2022 98851 SD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE (ZONE 02) FY22/23 - ADDITIONAL WORK
10/05/2022 98647 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-FIRE STATIONS 2, 6, 48, 58, 65, 91, & 99- JUL22
10/05/2022 98852 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-JUL22-LABOR TO RELOCATE ROTOR HEADS
10/05/2022 98645 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SENIOR CENTER-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98649 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL ANNEX-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98635 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT A-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98640 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD-JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 98628 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98629 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98636 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT B-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98638 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-ANIMAL SHELTER-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98639 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MARCH ANNEX BUILDING-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98641 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98643 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-LIBRARY-JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 98644 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98632 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/VANDENBERG TO FAY- JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 98633 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-NORTH AQUEDUCT-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98634 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PAN AM SECTION AQUEDUCT-JUL. 2022

Page 10 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 10/05/2022 98631 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-DELPHINIUM/PERHAM TO JFK-JUL22
10/05/2022 98637 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT/SCE AND OLD LAKE DRIVE-JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 99277 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-AUG22-LABOR TO REPAIR DRIP

IRRIIGATION
10/05/2022 98630 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/BAY AVE. TO GRAHAM- JUL. 2022
10/05/2022 98650 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-VETERANS MEMORIAL-JUL. 2022 10/05/2022 98651 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE-JUL. 2022

Page 11 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 34820 10/12/2022 99278 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK WQB $67,412.45 10/12/2022 99276 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK ZONE 02 10/12/2022 99275 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK ZONE 02 10/12/2022 99091 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99422 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK ZONE 02 10/12/2022 99094 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AMPHITHEATER FACILITY-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99543 SD LANDSCAPE SEPTEMBER BASE WQB
10/12/2022 99095 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST BASE WQB
10/12/2022 99534 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-UTILITY FIELD OFFICE-SEP. 2022 10/12/2022 98974R SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST ADDITIONAL WORK WQB 10/12/2022 99076 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT B-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99081 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99093 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/FAY TO GENTIAN- AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99083 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-LIBRARY-AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99540 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-KITCHING ELECTRIC SUBSTATION-SEP. 2022 10/12/2022 99069 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99786 SD LANDSCAPE SEPTEMBER ADDITIONAL WORK ZONE 02 10/12/2022 99068 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER-AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99067 SD LANDSCAPE AUGUST BASE ZONE 02
10/12/2022 99071 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-DEPHINIUM/PERHAM TO JFK-AUG22
10/12/2022 99089 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL ANNEX-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99072 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/VANDENBERG TO FAY- AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99787 SD LANDSCAPE SEPTEMBER ADDITIONAL WORK WQB 10/12/2022 99070 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/BAY AVE. TO GRAHAM- AUG. 2022

Page 12 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 34820 10/12/2022 99515 SD LANDSCAPE SEPTEMBER BASE ZONE 02 $67,412.45 10/12/2022 99530 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MORENO BEACH ELECTRIC SUBSTATION- SEP. 2022
10/12/2022 99073 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-NORTH AQUEDUCT-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99090 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-VETERANS MEMORIAL-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99084 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99088 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL-AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99078 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-ANIMAL SHELTER-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99074 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PAN AM SECTION AQUEDUCT-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99075 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT A-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99087 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-FIRE STATIONS 2, 6, 48, 58, 65, 91, & 99- AUG22
10/12/2022 99077 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT/SCE AND OLD LAKE DRIVE-AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99079 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MARCH ANNEX BUILDING-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 99080 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD-AUG. 2022
10/12/2022 99085 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SENIOR CENTER-AUG. 2022

Page 13 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 34894 10/19/2022 99523 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT A-SEP. 2022 $25,726.79 10/19/2022 99538 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-VETERANS MEMORIAL-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99533 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SENIOR CENTER-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99519 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-DEPHINIUM/PERHAM TO JFK-SEP22
10/19/2022 99520 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/VANDENBERG TO FAY- SEP. 2022
10/19/2022 99521 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-NORTH AQUEDUCT-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99522 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PAN AM SECTION AQUEDUCT-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99518 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/BAY AVE. TO GRAHAM- SEP. 2022
10/19/2022 99801 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-SCE/OLD LAKE DR-SEP22/REPLACE BROKEN IRRIG.
10/19/2022 99539 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99542 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AMPHITHEATER FACILITY-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99524 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-SOUTH AQUEDUCT B-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99802 LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK-CRC-SEP22/INSTALL IRRIGATION TO

PALM TREE
10/19/2022 99537 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL ANNEX-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99536 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY HALL-SEP. 2022
10/19/2022 99535 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-FIRE STATIONS 2, 6, 48, 58, 65, 91, & 99- SEP22
10/19/2022 99527 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-MARCH ANNEX BUILDING-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99532 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99517 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99528 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CITY YARD-SEP. 2022
10/19/2022 99529 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99516 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 99526 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-ANIMAL SHELTER-SEP. 2022

Page 14 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. 10/19/2022 99525 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT/SCE AND OLD LAKE DRIVE-SEP. 2022
Payment Amount
10/19/2022 99531 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-LIBRARY-SEP. 2022
10/19/2022 99541 LANDSCAPE MAINT.-AQUEDUCT BIKEWAY/FAY TO GENTIAN-SEP. 2022
$211,047.63Remit to: IRWINDALE, CA FYTD:

MERCHANTS BUILDING
MAINTENANCE, LLC.
34750 10/05/2022 694329 CITY-WIDE ROUTINE JANITORIAL SERVICES - AUG. 2022 $94,271.53 10/05/2022 694327 CITY-WIDE ROUTINE JANITORIAL SERVICES - JUL. 2022 34945 10/26/2022 697659 CITY-WIDE ROUTINE JANITORIAL SERVICES - SEP. 2022 $50,869.47 10/26/2022 699755 SEP 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-TOWNGATE COMM. CTR.
10/26/2022 699752 SCRUB & REFINISH BALL ROOM STAGE ON 9/27/22 10/26/2022 699751 SEP 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-CONF. & REC.

CENTER
10/26/2022 699753 SEP 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-

COTTONWOOD GOLF CTR
10/26/2022 688081 JUL 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENTS AT SENIOR CENTER $237,487.75Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY UTILITY 244311 10/12/2022 SEP-22 10/12/22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR PERIOD 08/19-09/16/22 $143,238.04 $531,599.93Remit to: HEMET, CA FYTD:

ORACLE AMERICA 34832 10/12/2022 100385883 ORACLE UTILITIES CUSTOMER CLOUD SERVICES $70,371.95 $70,371.95Remit to: REDWOOD SHORES, CA FYTD:

Page 15 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
PERMA 34950 10/26/2022 INITIAL DEPOSIT ESTABLISH LIABILITY MEMBER TRUST ACCOUNT (INITIAL DEPOSIT) $50,000.00 $1,884,082.00Remit to: PALM DESERT, CA FYTD:

RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 34903 10/19/2022 2022_10_RE AST 2 RENEWABLE ENERGY-MV UTILITY-SEPTEMBER 2022 $32,753.90 $236,312.80Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD:

RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, INC
244357 10/19/2022 220711_01 $43,658.00
10/19/2022 220711_02
SR60/MORENO BEACH PH 2
SR60/MORENO BEACH PH 2
$103,989.99Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY &

SCOTT, LLP
34906 10/19/2022 71417 AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY ENDING 6/30/22 - SEP 2022 PROGRESS

BILLING
$28,000.00
$48,735.00Remit to: SAN BERNARDINO, CA FYTD:

SC COMMERCIAL LLC DBA SC
FUELS
34908 10/19/2022 2241355-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT $45,783.86 10/19/2022 2240466-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2236046-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2235095-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2233256-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2230903-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2229898-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2228022-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2224671-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT 10/19/2022 2224271-IN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT $248,889.65Remit to: ORANGE, CA FYTD:

Page 16 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount

SELS USA LLC DBA SMART ERA

LIGHTING SYSTEMS
244270 10/05/2022 0472791 PORTABLE GENERATOR & TOWABLE SOLAR-POWERED LIGHT TOWER
$41,621.48
$41,621.48Remit to: WINSTON SALEM, NC FYTD:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 244272 10/05/2022 7501450008 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/17160 KITCHING ST. SUBSTATION-AUG. 2022
$66,420.95
10/05/2022 7501450026 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/IRIS AVE.-AUG. 2022 10/05/2022 7501450027 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GRAHAM ST.-AUG. 2022 10/05/2022 7501450028 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/GLOBE ST.-AUG. 2022 10/05/2022 7501450029 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/NANDINA AVE.-AUG. 2022 10/05/2022 7501450030 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/FREDERICK AVE.-AUG. 2022 10/05/2022 7501450034 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/24417 NANDINA AVE. SUBSTATION-AUG. 2022
10/05/2022 7501450031 WDAT CHARGES-MVU/SUBSTATION 115KV INTERCONNECTION- AUG. 2022
244343 10/19/2022 498683714/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS $133,957.29 10/19/2022 559238386/SEP-22 IFA & DISTRIBUTION UPGRADE CHARGES-KITCHING SUBSTATION 10/19/2022 433869021/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ADDED STREETLIGHTS 10/19/2022 355556776/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS 10/19/2022 282492235/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY-FERC CHARGES/MVU 10/19/2022 431591238/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ACQUIRED STREETLIGHTS 10/19/2022 SEP-22 10/19/22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES
10/19/2022 435293103/SEP-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES FOR ADDED STREETLIGHTS 10/19/2022 395913224/AUG-22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES
10/19/2022 570511709/SEP-22 IFA CHARGES-SUBSTATION
$985,819.64Remit to: ROSEMEAD, CA FYTD:

Page 17 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
STEVEN B. QUINTANILLA A

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
34850 10/12/2022 JULY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 7/1 TO 7/31/22 $121,197.34 10/12/2022 SEP-22/NIELSEN SPECIAL COUNSEL LITIGATION SVCS-NIELSEN, ET AL. 9/01-9/30/22 10/12/2022 AUG-22/NIELSEN SPECIAL COUNSEL LITIGATION SVCS-NIELSEN, ET AL. 8/01-8/31/22 $563,196.98Remit to: PALM SPRINGS, CA FYTD:

SWARCO MCCAIN, INC. 34954 10/26/2022 INV0268188 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT $26,474.44 10/26/2022 INV0268102 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
10/26/2022 INV0268398 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
10/26/2022 INV0268749 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
10/26/2022 INV0268751 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
10/26/2022 INV0268605 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
$26,474.44Remit to: VISTA, CA FYTD:

THE ADVANTAGE GROUP/ FLEX

ADVANTAGE
34758 10/05/2022 202210 OCTOBER 2022 RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFIT BILLING $47,968.70 $200,460.15Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD:

THINK TOGETHER, INC 34852 10/12/2022 111-23-E03 ASES EXPANDED LEARNING PROGRAM MGMT. SERVICES- INSTALLMENT #3
$684,515.81
$4,777,252.56Remit to: SANTA ANA, CA FYTD:

TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC. 34761 10/05/2022 20221409 SR60/REDLANDS BLVD INTERCHANGE $70,328.79 $88,510.89Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD:

U.S. BANK/CALCARDS 34763 10/05/2022 09-27-22 SEPTEMBER 2022 CALCARD ACTIVITY $237,122.36 $1,321,720.31Remit to: ST. LOUIS, MO FYTD:

Page 18 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 OR GREATER
Payment Amount
WASTE MANAGEMENT 244322 10/12/2022 070622 SOLID WASTE DELINQUENCIES PASS THRU, LESS FRANCHISE FEES $800,646.19 $823,876.16Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD:

WELLS FARGO CORPORATE TRUST 34923 10/12/2022 W221001 DEBT SERVICE - 2021 LRB TAXABLE MVU $316,142.00 34924 10/12/2022 W221002 DEBT SERVICE - 2013 REF OF '05 LRB $1,665,620.80 34925 10/18/2022 W221003 DEBT SERVICE - 2014 REF OF '05 LRB $564,066.56 34926 10/18/2022 W221004 DEBT SERVICE - 2019 LRB MVU $316,600.00 $4,388,436.32Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

WILLDAN ENGINEERING 34959 10/26/2022 002-27175 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR BLDG. & SAFETY DEPT.- JUL22
$91,778.99
$275,541.74Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 34919 10/19/2022 010-52601 ERAP GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2022 $56,291.25 10/19/2022 010-52600 CARES ACT GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2022 10/19/2022 010-52602 GRANT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES-SEP. 2022 $153,970.14Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD:

WSP USA, INC. 34962 10/26/2022 1219669 SUNNYMEAD MDP LINE F AND F-7 $28,386.37 $93,302.40Remit to: SAN BERNARDINO, CA FYTD:

TOTAL AMOUNTS OF $25,000 OR GREATER $14,295,650.07

Page 19 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
24771 NANDINA LLC 244323 10/12/2022 PEN20-0041 REFUND GRADING SECURITY DEPOSIT-PROJECT PEN20-0041 $7,664.00 $7,664.00Remit to: OAKBROOK TERRACE, IL FYTD:
4LEAF, INC 244253 10/05/2022 J3988C PLANNING SERVICES-JULY 2022 $6,080.00 $15,240.00Remit to: PLEASANTON, CA FYTD:

ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC 34779 10/12/2022 20311786 BOILER BURNER REPLACEMENT HVAC REPAIR-CITY HALL $18,018.00 10/12/2022 20290702 HVAC PREV. MAINTENANCE-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/12/2022 20311787 PUPPY COOLER HVAC REPAIRS-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/12/2022 20290700 HVAC PREV. MAINTENANCE-CITY HALL
10/12/2022 20311788 AC-2 UNIT TROUBLESHOOT HVAC REPAIRS-CITY HALL 10/12/2022 20319122 FREEZER EVAP COIL & TXV REPLACEMENT-COTTONWOOD GOLD CENTER
10/12/2022 20290701 HVAC PREV. MAINTENANCE-ANIMAL SHELTER $72,744.00Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

ADMINSURE 34929 10/26/2022 15498 WORKERS' COMP CLAIM ADMIN-NOVEMBER 2022 $2,441.00 $14,574.00Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD:

ADOPT A HIGHWAY LITTER

REMOVAL SERVICE OF AMERICA
34780 10/12/2022 220524 HWY 60 WB $625.00
$2,500.00Remit to: ENCINITAS, CA FYTD:

ADVANCED APPLIED

ENGINEERING, INC
34706 10/05/2022 27757 PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES-JUNE TO JULY 2022 $11,950.25 $11,950.25Remit to: BREA, CA FYTD:

AFUNGIA, TEUMALANGA 244279 10/05/2022 2002871.047 REFUND- SECURITY GUARD (SC RENTAL) $243.00 $557.50Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 20 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
AIR EXCHANGE INC 34707 10/05/2022 91607936 PLYMOVENT MAINT & REPAIR-FIRE STATIONS $1,396.66 $2,644.24Remit to: FAIRFIELD, CA FYTD:

AIRESPRING INC. 34865 10/19/2022 165079955 LOCAL/LONG DISTANCE CALLS & INTERNET SVC-OCT. 2022 $4,768.19 $13,275.22Remit to: VAN NUYS, CA FYTD:

ALISAM MORENO OPERATING,

INC DBA WATERDROPS EXPRES
34708 10/05/2022 1003 CAR WASHING SERVICES FOR POLICE PATROL VEHICLES $476.00 $476.00Remit to: WOODLAND HILLS, CA FYTD:

AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 34709 10/05/2022 76518 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $1,279.40 10/05/2022 76204 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
10/05/2022 74882 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
10/05/2022 76495 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
34781 10/12/2022 76568 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $306.10
34866 10/19/2022 76630 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $1,547.18
10/19/2022 76629 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
10/19/2022 76590 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS
34930 10/26/2022 76653 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS $61.22
$9,377.10Remit to: LA QUINTA, CA FYTD:

Page 21 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 34782 10/12/2022 151400868956 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-CITY HALL-AUGUST 2022 $10,193.19 10/12/2022 151400899853 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-EOC-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 151400899852 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-CITY HALL-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 DVB28595001 EMERGENCY REPAIR OF CITY HALL ELEVATOR - RELAY BOARD 10/12/2022 151400837019 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-EOC-JULY 2022 10/12/2022 151400837018 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-CITY HALL-JULY 2022 10/12/2022 151400868957 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-EOC-AUGUST 2022 34931 10/26/2022 151400933454 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-EOC-OCTOBER 2022 $295.00 10/26/2022 151400933453 ELEVATOR ROUTINE MAINT.-CITY HALL-OCTOBER 2022 $10,488.19Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

ANGULO, GUADALUPE 244397 10/26/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $500.00 10/26/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

ARIA MANAGEMENT LLC 34710 10/05/2022 OCTOBER 2022 LEASE PAYMENT-LIBRARY-OCTOBER 2022 $11,666.97 34932 10/26/2022 NOVEMBER 2022 LEASE PAYMENT-LIBRARY-NOVEMBER 2022 $11,666.97 $58,334.85Remit to: YORBA LINDA, CA FYTD:

ARROYO, GISSELE 34783 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

AUTOMATIC STOREFRONT

SERVICE/E-Z AUTOMATED

SYSTEMS
244254 10/05/2022 0031718 HUNTER DOOR 105B REPAIR-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. $1,399.54 $1,399.54Remit to: CHINO, CA FYTD:

AVELAR, CONNIE 34784 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 22 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
BAKER, LEAH 244280 10/05/2022 R22-165630 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: LOMA LINDA, CA FYTD:

BERLITZ LANGUAGES, INC. 244330 10/19/2022 001-274-22-02832 BILINGUAL EXAMS $225.00 244360 10/26/2022 001-274-22-02986 BILINGUAL EXAMS $150.00 $900.00Remit to: PRINCETON, NJ FYTD:

BIO-TOX LABORATORIES, INC. 244301 10/12/2022 43267 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD $15,959.72 10/12/2022 43197 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/12/2022 43251 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/12/2022 43330 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/12/2022 43329 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/12/2022 43196 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 244361 10/26/2022 43457 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD $10,268.33 10/26/2022 43512 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/26/2022 43524 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD 10/26/2022 43456 FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY TESTING SVCS FOR PD $41,933.05Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

BLANKENSHIP, MELYSSA 34785 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

BLOTT, JENNIFER 244281 10/05/2022 R22-165992 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FYTD:

BLUE OUTDOOR LLC 34711 10/05/2022 2022-10-11358 ADVERTISING FOR OCTOBER 2022 $585.00 $585.00Remit to: NEW YORK, NY FYTD:

Page 23 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

BMW MOTORCYCLES OF

RIVERSIDE
34712 10/05/2022 6031322 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $1,785.74 10/05/2022 6031377 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
34786 10/12/2022 6031411 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $1,761.73 10/12/2022 6031471 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
34867 10/19/2022 6031496 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE $1,914.96 10/19/2022 6031539 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
10/19/2022 6031538 MAINT & REPAIRS-TRAFFIC MOTORCYCLE
$93,582.74Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 24 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

BOX SPRINGS MUTUAL WATER

COMPANY
244331 10/19/2022 36-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
$449.74
10/19/2022 1087-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 204-9 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 1084-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 45-4 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 80-4 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 1086-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 721-1 9/29/22 WATER USAGE-TOWNGATE-SEPT 2022 10/19/2022 1085-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 195-5 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 189-13 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 331-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
10/19/2022 1088-1 9/29/22 WATER ASSESSMENT ON VACANT LOTS OWNED BY THE

HOUSING AUTHORITY
$1,786.10Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE,
P.C.
34713 10/05/2022 20684 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY-JULY/AUG 2022 $196.01 $471.82Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

Page 25 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
BREHM BUILDERS 244377 10/26/2022 CK NO. 234866 REISSUE OF UNCLAIMED CHECK FOR REFUND OF DEPOSIT ACCT TR-30300-2
$1,176.90
$1,176.90Remit to: TUSTIN, CA FYTD:

BRIDGEPAY NETWORK

SOLUTIONS
34933 10/26/2022 10648 CREDIT CARD GATEWAY SVCS-AUGUST 2022 $22.40 $66.10Remit to: ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL FYTD:

BUBNICK, JEREMY D 34868 10/19/2022 9/19 - 9/22/22 TRAVEL PER DIEM - NRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE $241.50 $241.50Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

C.A.C.E.O./CAL ASSO OF CODE

ENFORCEMENT
244332 10/19/2022 200022059 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-ROBERTO LUERA $390.00 10/19/2022 200022058 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-PAMELA CHAFFIN 10/19/2022 200022051 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-ROBERT ALVAREZ 10/19/2022 200022056 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-JORGE RUVALCABA 10/19/2022 200022055 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-HERNAN LOPEZ 10/19/2022 200022057 AVERT COURSE 8.11.2022-LANEE PADILLA $390.00Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

CABRERA, RAVEN 244395 10/26/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $500.00 10/26/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CALIFORNIA BUILDING

STANDARDS COMMISSION
244362 10/26/2022 3RD QTR 2022 SB 1473 FEES COLLECTED FOR 7/1-9/30/22 $4,861.80 $7,542.90Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

Page 26 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF TAX AND

FEE ADMINISTRATION
35029 10/31/2022 3RD QTR 2022 ACCT# 31-000177 ELECTRICAL ENERGY SURCHARGE RETURN/JUL- SEP 20221
$19,045.00
$34,191.00Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
STATISTICS, INC. V1
244255 10/05/2022 22092701 DIRECT & OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT AS OF 6/30/22 $550.00 $550.00Remit to: OAKLAND, CA FYTD:

CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS

PARTNERSHIP
244256 10/05/2022 0011545602 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS $2,801.44 10/05/2022 0011545937 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545946 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011548192 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545582 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545932 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545591 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545607 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 10/05/2022 0011545613 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-LEGALS 244333 10/19/2022 238423DF-0033 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ADVERTISING-HEACOCK LOGISTICS

PARKING NOI
$476.90
$10,011.95Remit to: WILLOUGHBY, OH FYTD:

CALIFORNIA SURVEYING &
DRAFTING SUPPLY INC.,

CALIFORNIA SURVEYING &

DRAFTING
244334 10/19/2022 91232759 TERRAFLEX ADV VIA TRIMBLE CONNECT & SUPPORT $1,840.00 $1,840.00Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

Page 27 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CAMERON-DANIEL, P.C. 34870 10/19/2022 1344 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY $6,682.50 10/19/2022 1345 LEGAL SERVICES-MV UTILITY
$24,392.50Remit to: SEBASTOPOL, CA FYTD:

CANAL ALARM DEVICES, INC. 244257 10/05/2022 SI-641869 CAMERA EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES $7,135.00 10/05/2022 SI-641384 CAMERA EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES
$7,135.00Remit to: RONKONKOMA, NY FYTD:

CANYON SPRINGS LITTLE LEAGUE 34714 10/05/2022 SEP. 30, 2022 SPONSORSHIP OF TWO TEAMS-RED SOX (FARM & INTERMED)

SPLIT EQUALLY
$500.00
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CARLOS, MARIA 244347 10/19/2022 2002884.047 DEPOSIT REFUND-TOWNGATE COMM. CTR $209.60 $209.60Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CASC ENGINEERING AND
CONSULTING, INC.
34715 10/05/2022 0047211 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PWQMP $12,000.00 10/05/2022 0046961 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PWQMP
$16,637.25Remit to: COLTON, CA FYTD:

CATALAN, CARLOS GUTIERREZ 244378 10/26/2022 R22-168607 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-RETURN ADOPTION, REFUND LICENSE FEE
$15.00
$15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CCS DISASTER RECOVERY

SERVICES, LLC
34871 10/19/2022 6597 DISASTER RECOVERY SVCS ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION & INITIAL

SETUP FEE
$5,000.00
$5,000.00Remit to: COSTA MESA, CA FYTD:

Page 28 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CHANCY, CHIZURU 244302 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-HULA & ORI TAHITI PERFORMING ARTS CLASS
$34.80
$177.60Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CHANDLER ASSET

MANAGEMENT, INC
34787 10/12/2022 2209MORENOVA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SVCS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $8,606.38 $34,784.15Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD:

CHAVARIN, DESTINY 244379 10/26/2022 R22-167532 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: SUN CITY, CA FYTD:

CHRIS ALAN VOGT DBA CAV

CONSULTING
34788 10/12/2022 21039 SENIOR ENGINEER CONSULTING SERVICES (LDD)-SEPTEMBER 2022
$7,644.00
$156,650.75Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 29 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 34873 10/19/2022 4125596950 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 $11,484.89 10/19/2022 4129009734 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4129693690 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4126274779 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4128333586 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4126959035 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4127640992 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4130396859 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 10/19/2022 4124983397 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 34936 10/26/2022 4131064709 UNIFORM RENTAL & LAUNDERING SRVS FY 22/23 $1,670.10 10/26/2022 5119942641 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES-BERC-BUS & EMPLOYMENT RESOURCE CTR
10/26/2022 5119942654 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER 10/26/2022 5119942670 FIRST AID SUPPLIES-COTTONWOOD GOLF COURSE 10/26/2022 5119942673 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES-VALLEY SKATE PARK $25,061.70Remit to: CINCINNATI, OH FYTD:

CLARITAS HOLDINGS, INC. DBA

CLARITAS, LLC
34937 10/26/2022 2717993 2022 RENEWAL: SPOTLIGHT STANDARD PACKAGE $1,495.00 $1,495.00Remit to: CINCINNATI, OH FYTD:

CLARK LAND RESOURCES, INC. 34790 10/12/2022 CMV-0722 RIGHT OF WAY CONSULTING SERVICES $9,311.88 $9,511.88Remit to: OCEANSIDE, CA FYTD:

CLARK, ADAM 34789 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

COATS, DAVID 34874 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - SHITO-RYU KARATE CLASSES $421.80 $1,732.80Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 30 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
COOLEY, DONNA 34791 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244296 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC. 34717 10/05/2022 DS1303047 OFF-SITE MEDIA STORAGE-AUGUST 2022 $431.55 34875 10/19/2022 DS1303350 OFF-SITE MEDIA STORAGE-SEPTEMBER 2022 $428.93 $1,799.71Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION,
INC
34792 10/12/2022 120082428 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DATABASE SVC-JULY 2022 $6,484.00 10/12/2022 120106005 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DATABASE SVC-AUGUST 2022 10/12/2022 120122333 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DATABASE SVC-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/12/2022 120146749 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DATABASE SVC-OCTOBER 2022 $8,105.00Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

COUNTRY SQUIRE ESTATES 244258 10/05/2022 SEPT 2022 UUT REFUND FOR SEPT 2022 $22.67 $85.45Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD:

Page 31 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. 34718 10/05/2022 22612 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION $3,780.00 10/05/2022 22595 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22598 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22744 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22599 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22698 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22600 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22604 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22666 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22669 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22691 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22647 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22681 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22678 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
10/05/2022 22646 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
$4,860.00Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD:

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 244259 10/05/2022 PE0000000510 TRAFFIC MOTOR COMMUNICATIONS FOR PD 8/1-8/31/22 $2,174.76 244303 10/12/2022 22-292685 JULY COUNTY PARCEL LIST $52.00 244335 10/19/2022 3622 REGISTERED VOTERS CONFIRMATION-CFD NO. 2021- 01/AMENDMENT NO. 53
$35.00
$169,138.21Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SHERIFF 34719 10/05/2022 SH0000041844 TOBACCO GRANT BILLING - 8/11-8/24/22 $1,500.92 $15,348,820.23Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 32 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN, LLC 34720 10/05/2022 43044 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $1,900.00 10/05/2022 43035 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE
10/05/2022 43042 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE
34793 10/12/2022 43068 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $850.00 34939 10/26/2022 43100 BIO HAZARD REMOVAL SERVICE $200.00 $14,800.00Remit to: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FYTD:

CROSSROAD MEGAWASH, INC

DBA WASH BANK EXPRESS
34721 10/05/2022 008 CAR WASH SVC-PD-JULY 2022 TO AUGUST 2022 $1,445.00 $7,035.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC 34876 10/19/2022 1218321 INTERNET & DATA SVCS 10/01-10/31/22 $2,537.50 10/19/2022 1192852 INTERNET & DATA SVCS 09/01-09/30/22
$5,037.50Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD:

CRP/PDC MORENO VALLEY

OWNER LLC
244380 10/26/2022 BFC22-0114 REFUND OVER-ASSESSED PLAN CHECK FEE-13850 OLD 215

FRONTAGE RD
$3,362.91
$3,362.91Remit to: NEWPORT BEACH, CA FYTD:

CWE CORP. 34722 10/05/2022 22409 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PWQMP-AUGUST 2022 $2,101.00 10/05/2022 22369 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PWQMP-JULY 2022
$2,101.00Remit to: FULLERTON, CA FYTD:

DANKS, HARRISON 244282 10/05/2022 R22-165913 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: MURRIETA, CA FYTD:

Page 33 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
DATA TICKET, INC. 34723 10/05/2022 142800 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-JULY 2022 $21,775.23 10/05/2022 142800TPC ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-3RD PARTY COLLECTIONS-CODE- AUG 2022
10/05/2022 142801 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-PD-AUGUST 2022 10/05/2022 142508HH PARKING HANDHELD DEVICES LEASE-AIR TIME-CODE-AUGUST 2022
10/05/2022 142508 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING-CODE-AUGUST 2022 10/05/2022 142798 ADMIN CITATION PROCESSING-ANIMAL SVC-AUGUST 2022 $115,605.70Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD:

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 244363 10/26/2022 3RD QTR 2022 SMI FEES REPORT-3RD QTR ENDING 9/30/22 $8,399.99 $13,710.40Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

DESCOTEAUX, JULIA M. 244375 10/26/2022 10/06/22-REIMB. REIMBURSE HOTEL COST PAID BY EMPLOYEE FOR ACCELA

CONFERENCE
$918.54
$1,258.17Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

DIAZ, GABRIEL 244376 10/26/2022 10/2 - 10/4/22 TRAVEL PER DIEM, LODGING & MILEAGE REIMB.-APA CALIF.

CONFERENCE
$595.09
$595.09Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CORP.
34878 10/19/2022 45803 SOFTWARE ASSURANCE/MAINTENANCE-8/28/22-9/27/22 $900.00 10/19/2022 45486 SOFTWARE ASSURANCE/MAINTENANCE-7/28/22-8/27/22 $4,155.00Remit to: SANTA CLARITA, CA FYTD:

DIMAS, MARIA 244381 10/26/2022 R22-168407 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT FOR 2 CATS $150.00 $150.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 34 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
DISH DBS CORPORATION 244304 10/12/2022 86557282/OCT22 SATELLITE TV-FIRE STATION 99-10/1-10/30/22 $146.39 $585.56Remit to: PALATINE, IL FYTD:

DIVISION OF THE STATE

ARCHITECT
244305 10/12/2022 3RD QTR 2022-786 STATE PORTION-DISABILITY ACCESS & EDUCATION FEE REPORT 786
$223.20
$531.80Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

E.R. BLOCK PLUMBING &
HEATING, INC.
34794 10/12/2022 137792 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-FIRE STATION 2 $3,564.38 34880 10/19/2022 137871 SD BACKFLOW TESTING -ZN D, E-7, 01A, NPDES, $1,385.00 10/19/2022 137996 BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST-PARKS
10/19/2022 137993 SD BACKLOW REPAIR - ZONE D
$18,053.89Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

EMERGENT BATTERY
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
34725 10/05/2022 41194 REPLACEMENT BATTERIES (40) FOR BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS $6,901.90 $20,705.70Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

EMPIRE MOWER 244365 10/26/2022 23785 TREE TRIMMING EQUIPMENT PARTS $912.63 10/26/2022 24070 TREE TRIMMING EQUIPMENT PARTS
$2,123.87Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 35 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

ENCO UTILITY SERVICES MORENO

VALLEY LLC
34795 10/12/2022 INV56053 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION $1,936.00 10/12/2022 INV55795 METER FEES-25079 IRIS AVE
10/12/2022 0402-MF-2723 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/12/2022 INV56054 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/12/2022 INV56156 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
10/12/2022 INV56155 SOLAR SYSTEM INSPECTION
$4,096,643.06Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

ESCARPITA, ARTURO 244348 10/19/2022 R22-167139 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

ESTRADA, CHRISTOPHER ANGEL 34796 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

ESTRADA, MOISES 244283 10/05/2022 R22-167784 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-MICROCHIP REFUND $16.00 $16.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

EVEREST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 244324 10/12/2022 2021-18220 ANNUAL REPORT-SWARM 20/21 PARTIAL ANNUAL REPORT FILING
$600.00
$600.00Remit to: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA FYTD:

Page 36 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
EXCLUSIVE TOWING 244261 10/05/2022 22-17058 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING $2,866.50 10/05/2022 22-17883 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
10/05/2022 22-17884 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
10/05/2022 22-17901 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
10/05/2022 22-17497 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
10/05/2022 22-17059 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
244306 10/12/2022 22-18089 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING $544.25 10/12/2022 22-18098 EVIDENCE VEHICLE TOWING
$3,683.75Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

FAST SIGNS 244262 10/05/2022 70-1915 REVINYL SIGN PEN22-0108 $388.09 $4,679.19Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE, LLC 244307 10/12/2022 20027760922 ONLINE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION-SEPTEMBER 2022 $99.00 $396.00Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

FM THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING
INC
34728 10/05/2022 44411 EMERGENCY HVAC REPAIR-MVU KITCHING SUBSTATION $3,115.87 10/05/2022 44410 COMPRESSOR/II DRIER/CONTACTOR REPAIR-FIRE STAITON 91 34798 10/12/2022 44466 BARRACKS HVAC REPAIR-FIRE STATION 91 $699.10 $5,624.79Remit to: BREA, CA FYTD:

FRANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC. DBA

FRANCE MEDIA, INC
34729 10/05/2022 2022-51641 FULL PAGE AD-WESTERN REAL ESTATE BUSINESS-SEPT 2022 ISSUE $2,900.00 $6,350.00Remit to: ATLANTA, GA FYTD:

FRED'S GLASS & MIRROR, INC. 244263 10/05/2022 25482 WINDOW REPAIR-MARCH FIELD PARK CC $1,590.79 $1,590.79Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 37 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 244264 10/05/2022 081095-5/SEPT22 FOREIGN EXCHANGE BUS LISTING-MV UTILITY $7.70 244337 10/19/2022 081095-5/OCT22 FOREIGN EXCHANGE BUS LISTING-MV UTILITY $7.70 244366 10/26/2022 062221-5/OCT2022 COMMUNICATION SVCS-09/28-10/27/22 $1,208.58 $12,068.73Remit to: CINCINNATI, OH FYTD:

FRONTIER COMMUNITIES 244383 10/26/2022 BFT22-0042 REFUND PLANNING REVIEW FEE-PERMIT VOIDED-TR 37544 $166.00 $166.00Remit to: ONTARIO, CA FYTD:

G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS, INC. 34730 10/05/2022 0278949-IN FREEDOM TASK SEATING-TECHNOLOGY SVCS $14,992.68 10/05/2022 0279017-IN TABLES & CHAIRS-POLICE
34884 10/19/2022 0279658-IN LATERAL FILE CABINET & PENCIL DRAWER-PARKS MAINT $913.96 $54,138.76Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

GALLEGOS, KIMBERLY 244325 10/12/2022 R22-168240 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-REFUND LICENSE FEES DOG

RETURNED
$15.00
$15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

GALLS INC., INLAND UNIFORM 34731 10/05/2022 BC1711856 SEASON JACKETS FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT $1,028.92 34799 10/12/2022 BC1694589 TACTICAL CARRIER & BODY ARMOR-CODE $4,057.92 10/12/2022 BC1694304 TACTICAL CARRIER & BODY ARMOR-CODE $5,207.01Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

GARCIA, CHANTEL 34885 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - ART EXPRESSION CLASSES $464.40 $464.40Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

GARCIA, JAKELINE 34800 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 38 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
GARCIA, MELISSA 34801 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

GARDAWORLD 34802 10/12/2022 10703971 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, MVU, LIBRARY &

ANIMAL SVC
$4,479.61
10/12/2022 10707923 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, MVU, LIBRARY &

ANIMAL SVC
10/12/2022 10700151 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, MVU, LIBRARY &

ANIMAL SVC
10/12/2022 20540186 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, LIBRARY & ANIMAL SVC
10/12/2022 20536904 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, LIBRARY & ANIMAL SVC
10/12/2022 10711968 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, MVU, LIBRARY &

ANIMAL SVC
34886 10/19/2022 20543752 ARMORED CAR SVC-CITY HALL, CONF & REC, MVU, LIBRARY &

ANIMAL SVC
$454.94
$8,836.42Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

GLOBAL MUSIC RIGHTS, LLC 34803 10/12/2022 INV-GMR-65657 GLOBAL MUSIC RIGHTS LICENSE-5/1/22 TO 4/30/23 $2,000.00 $2,000.00Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

GLOBAL POWER GROUP, INC. 244308 10/12/2022 84095 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE & REPAIR-FIRE STATION 6 $1,985.94 10/12/2022 84054 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE & REPAIR-FIRE STATION 6 10/12/2022 84023 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE & REPAIR-FIRE STATION 99 10/12/2022 84052 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE & REPAIR-FIRE STATION 48 10/12/2022 84021 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE & REPAIR-FIRE STATION 65 $3,556.18Remit to: LAKESIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 39 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY,
DBA: GST
244265 10/05/2022 IN78005 ALIENVAULT SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE $6,117.15 $6,117.15Remit to: CERRITOS, CA FYTD:

GREENTECH LANDSCAPE, INC. 34732 10/05/2022 53844 SD LANDSCAPE MONTH BASE (VALLEY) ZONE D $24,584.81 10/05/2022 53841 SD LANDSCAPE MONTH BASE (WEST) ZONE 01,01A, 08, & E-7 $350,361.22Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

GROUP C MEDIA INC. 34733 10/05/2022 34052 1/2 PAGE ADVERTISING-BUSINESS FACILITIES-ISSUE 9/01/22 $2,600.00 $5,200.00Remit to: RED BANK, NJ FYTD:

GURNEY, RICHARD 244384 10/26/2022 R22-168523 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER AND RABIES DEPOSITS $95.00 $95.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 244326 10/12/2022 MVU-7013703-02 COMMERCIAL LED REBATE INCENTIVE $13,784.40 $113,784.40Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

HDL COREN & CONE 244367 10/26/2022 SIN019986 CONTRACT SVCS-PROPERTY TAX SOFTWARE MAINT (JULY- SEPTEMBER 2022)
$6,413.67
$12,385.43Remit to: BREA, CA FYTD:

HLP, INC. 34735 10/05/2022 21753 WEBCHAMELEON SOFTWARE ANNUAL SUPPORT & MAINT $10,344.00 34888 10/19/2022 22300 WEB LICENSE MONTHLY SVC FEE $64.05 $10,619.80Remit to: LITTLETON, CO FYTD:

HOWARD, YAJAIRA 244349 10/19/2022 RCT# 1024975.047 REFUND OF DEPOSIT FOR CANCELLED EVENT AT TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CTR.
$209.60
$209.60Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD:

Page 40 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES

IRVINE, INC
34737 10/05/2022 22070294 PLAN CHECK SVCS-BRADSHAW MAJESTIC-JULY 2022 $1,476.01 10/05/2022 22070295 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR37725-PEN21-0206-JULY 2022 $18,972.03Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD:

HYLAND SOFTWARE, INC. (FMRLY

SIRE TECHNOLOGIES)
34738 10/05/2022 LE01-270669 SIRE SOFTWARE QTRLY MAINT 11/01/22-01/31/23 $6,652.10 $13,304.20Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD:

IMMI TAX SERVICES, LLC 34805 10/12/2022 2521 BACKGROUND CHECKS $182.00 34941 10/26/2022 2522 BACKGROUND CHECKS $130.00
$1,872.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY

SERVICE, INC
34739 10/05/2022 2022602 NUISANCE ABATEMENT SVCS-EQUESTRIAN CENTER $2,629.50 $60,940.32Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 41 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

INTERWEST CONSULTING
GROUP, INC.
34740 10/05/2022 80940 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN21-0133/ATWOOD FIVE-PLEX DEV-JULY 2022
$10,136.25
10/05/2022 80807 PLANNING CONSULTANT SVC-JULY 2022
10/05/2022 80943 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PM38082/PEN21-0079-JULY 2022 10/05/2022 80942 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR38237/DR HORTON-JULY 2022 10/05/2022 80938 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR32408/PEN19-0168-JULY 2022 10/05/2022 80941 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN21-0105-JULY 2022
10/05/2022 80939 PLAN CHECK SVCS-RIVARD BUS PARK-JULY 2022 34942 10/26/2022 81730 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR32408/PEN19-0168-AUGUST 2022 $3,997.50 10/26/2022 81731 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PEN21-0133/ATWOOD FIVE-PLEX DEV- AUGUST 2022
10/26/2022 81733 PLAN CHECK SVCS-TR38237/DR HORTON-AUGUST 2022 10/26/2022 81734 PLAN CHECK SVCS-PM38082/PEN21-0079-AUGUST 2022 $30,693.75Remit to: LOVELAND, CO FYTD:

ISRAEL IBARRA DBA WORLD

FAMOUS TACOS
34741 10/05/2022 1000 - FINAL BALANCE DUE FOR BENEFITS FAIR LUNCH ON 9/29/22 $1,030.00 $2,060.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

JAMES ELLIOTT ENTERTAINMENT 244392 10/26/2022 5521 BAND PERFORMANCE FOR DAY OF THE DEAD EVENT ON 10/28/22
$3,500.00
$7,000.00Remit to: RANCHO MIRAGE, CA FYTD:

JCA ENGINEERING, INC. 34742 10/05/2022 21-2765.1 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-VICTORIANO PARK $3,080.00 $15,400.00Remit to: HIGHLAND, CA FYTD:

JIMENEZ, VANESSA 34806 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244294 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 42 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
JOHNSON , TRACY 34889 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - SHITO-RYU KARATE CLASSES $421.80 $1,732.80Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 34744 10/05/2022 110938 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES $3,691.95 34943 10/26/2022 111057 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES $4,756.31 $12,822.10Remit to: ORANGE, CA FYTD:

KAMUNYU, NAOMI 244358 10/19/2022 10/4 -10/8/22 TRAVEL PER DIEM & MILEAGE - 2022 NEOGOV CONNECT

CONFERENCE
$548.00
$548.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

KELLY, SCHAKEEVIA 34807 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

KOEPFLI, TRISTAN 34891 10/19/2022 PO-MVSD 003 REPAINT HELMETS $700.00 $700.00Remit to: TEMECULA, CA FYTD:

KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS, USA
34808 10/12/2022 50895563 EQUIPMENT RELOCATION CHARGE-POLICE $400.00 34892 10/19/2022 9008793741 COPIER USAGE-PD LEASE-8/15-8/31/22 $10,342.58 10/19/2022 40886945 COPIER LEASE-CITY WIDE-SEPTEMBER 2022 10/19/2022 9008898189 COPIER USAGE-PD LEASE-OCTOBER 2022 10/19/2022 9008835492 COPIER USAGE-PD LEASE-SEPTEMBER 2022 $40,820.88Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

LARA, IVAN 34809 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD:

Page 43 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
LARAJARA, ANDREA 34810 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

LEIVAS, INC. DBA. LEIVAS

LIGHTING
34811 10/12/2022 1011200 SD LIGHTING REPAIR ADDITIONAL WORK ZONE D $412.57 $5,385.36Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

LEXISNEXIS PRACTICE

MANAGEMENT
34812 10/12/2022 3094093097 LEGAL RESEARCH TOOLS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $883.20 $3,532.80Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES,
LLC
34813 10/12/2022 INV6292 LIBRARY GRANT-CLLS-AUGUST 2022 $4,725.00 10/12/2022 INV6136B LIBRARY GRANT-CLLS-JULY 2022
$836,725.48Remit to: ROCKVILLE, MD FYTD:

LIEBERT, CASSIDY, WHITMORE 244266 10/05/2022 220978 ERC MEMBERSHIP-07/01/22 THROUGH 6/30/23 $3,975.00 $41,441.61Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

LONDON, JOHN 34814 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

LONDON, KORII 34815 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

LOPEZ, ALAN 34816 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244293 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 44 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
LOPEZ, JOANNA 34817 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244291 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

LOPEZ, VICTORIA 244393 10/26/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $500.00 10/26/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC. 34745 10/05/2022 18743 $520.00 10/05/2022 18742
PVT REHAB (CDBG FY 21/22)
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB FY 21/22
$520.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

LOZANO, CARISSA 244385 10/26/2022 R22-166631 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: MENIFEE, CA FYTD:

LYONS SECURITY SERVICE, INC. 34746 10/05/2022 29935 SECURITY GUARD SVC-ERC-AUGUST 2022 $4,480.65 10/05/2022 29937 SECURITY GUARD SVCS-SENIOR CENTER-AUGUST 2022 $124,465.71Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

M. BREY ELECTRIC, INC. 34944 10/26/2022 7827 EMERGENCY HOT WATER LINE REPAIR-FIRE STATION 6 $13,855.00 10/26/2022 7776 CONCRETE APPROACH REPAIR-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/26/2022 7915 PATIO COVER PAINT-FIRE STATION 48
$191,084.90Remit to: BEAUMONT, CA FYTD:

MAHBOUBI, REBECCA 244284 10/05/2022 R22-166845 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: BEVERLY HILLS, CA FYTD:

Page 45 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

MARCH JOINT POWERS

AUTHORITY
244267 10/05/2022 57617 GAS CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BUILDING 823-JUL. 2022 $74.67 10/05/2022 57620 GAS CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BUILDING 938-JUL. 2022 $240.02Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

MAR-CO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 34747 10/05/2022 188640 STREET SWEEPER REPAIR - LABOR & PARTS $1,446.14 $1,446.14Remit to: POMONA, CA FYTD:

MARGARITAS GRILL RESTAURANT
& CATERING, LLC
34819 10/12/2022 S02339 VIP CATERING-EL GRITO 2022 EVENT ON 9/15/22 $6,623.39 $16,884.95Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MARQUEZ, EMMA 244285 10/05/2022 2002861.047 REFUND- POM POM CHEERLEADING DRILL TEAM (AGES 8-15) $86.40 $86.40Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MARTINEZ, ISRAEL 34821 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244298 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MATTHEWS, MYESHA 244386 10/26/2022 2002889.047 DEPOSIT REFUND- SENIOR CTR. $320.00 $320.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MCGRATH RENTCORP AND

SUBSIDIARIES
34749 10/05/2022 300866681 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 9/29-10/28/22 $726.60 10/05/2022 300813095 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 7/31-8/29/22 10/05/2022 300788590 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 7/01-7/30/22 10/05/2022 300840619 TEMPORARY STORAGE UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 8/30-9/28/22 $908.25Remit to: SAN FRANCISCO, CA FYTD:

Page 46 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
MCRAE, HARRIET 34822 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244292 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MCT TECHNOLOGY, INC. 244368 10/26/2022 12381 CARECONNECT - CHILD CARE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM $7,704.00 $7,704.00Remit to: CHINO HILLS, CA FYTD:

MEKHAEEL, WAFAA 244387 10/26/2022 R22-166788 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MENDOZA, ANTHONY 34823 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MENGISTU, YESHIALEM 34895 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEPTEMBER 2022 $235.00 $505.92Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MERCHANTS BUILDING
MAINTENANCE, LLC.
34824 10/12/2022 695522 AUG 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-TOWNGATE COMM. CTR.
$2,180.00
10/12/2022 695526 JUL 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-TOWNGATE COMM. CTR.
10/12/2022 688080 JUL 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-

COTTONWOOD GOLF CTR
34896 10/19/2022 697487 AUG 2022 SPECIAL CLEANINGS FOR EVENT RENTALS-

COTTONWOOD GOLF CTR
$835.00
$237,487.75Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD:

MGT OF AMERICA, LLC 34751 10/05/2022 47162 SB 90 CLAIMS MANDATED COST FILING SERVICES (50%) $4,312.50 $4,312.50Remit to: TAMPA, FL FYTD:

Page 47 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

MICHAEL BAKER

INTERNATIONAL, INC
34825 10/12/2022 1158000 802 0004 INDIAN ST CARDINAL BRIDGE PH 2 $18,194.00 $21,572.75Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

MISSION LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 34752 10/05/2022 517841764 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $58.01 34826 10/12/2022 517887261 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $174.03 10/12/2022 517945056 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES
10/12/2022 517795105 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES
34946 10/26/2022 517990926 LINEN RENTAL SERVICES $58.01 $1,186.54Remit to: SANTA BARBARA, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE
244369 10/26/2022 7544 2022 BUSINESS EXPO BOOTH FEE - BERC $75.00 $75.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY

VET CARE
34897 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 VETERINARY SERVICES-MV ANIMAL SHELTER/SEPTEMBER 2022 $13,760.55 $53,249.33Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 244350 10/19/2022 2002877.047 DEPOSIT REFUND- CONFERENCE & RECREATION CENTER RENTAL $786.20 $786.20Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY HISPANIC

CHAMBER OF COMMER
244310 10/12/2022 1001 PLATINUM MEMBERSHIP/BENEFITS - FY 22/23 $15,000.00 $15,000.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORENO VALLEY MALL

HOLDING, LLC
34947 10/26/2022 NOV. 2022 RENT NOVEMBER 2022 RENT PAYMENT FOR SP. 2078-M.V. LIBRARY BRANCH
$6,874.54
$27,498.16Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 48 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

MORENO VALLEY TOW &

RADIATOR
244268 10/05/2022 17426 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $273.00
244339 10/19/2022 17613 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $819.00
10/19/2022 17535 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
$9,312.50Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORENO, JOSE 244286 10/05/2022 R22-167868 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-LICENSE REFUND $15.00 $15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MORRIS, KEVIN 244394 10/26/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $500.00 10/26/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MUNOZ, YVETTE 244388 10/26/2022 R22-168577 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON WEB LICENSE $20.00 $20.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

MUSICSTAR 244312 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-INTRO TO ANIME & CARTOON DRAWING

CLASSES
$175.20
$175.20Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

MWI ANIMAL HEALTH 244269 10/05/2022 43108229 ANIMAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES $62.67 244313 10/12/2022 43208300 ANIMAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES/VACCINES $308.10 244340 10/19/2022 43618954 ANIMAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES/VACCINES $824.33 10/19/2022 43578914 ANIMAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES/VACCINES
$3,516.06Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

NAMEKATA, JAMES 34898 10/19/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - SHITO-RYU KARATE CLASSES $410.40 $1,721.40Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 49 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
NAVARRO, CHRISTY 34827 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244297 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

NEW HORIZON MOBILE HOME
PARK
34899 10/19/2022 SEPT 2022 UUT REFUND FOR SEPT 2022 $10.20 $17.61Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

NEWHALL, KATRINA 244351 10/19/2022 R22-166337 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $150.00Remit to: GRANITE FALLS, WA FYTD:

NGUYEN, CLEMENT BA DUONG 34828 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-VOVINAM MARTIAL ARTS CLASSES $468.00 $1,665.00Remit to: BEAUMONT, CA FYTD:

NGUYEN, JASON 244352 10/19/2022 R22-167772 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

NPG INC, DBA GOLDSTAR

ASPHALT PRODUCTS
34829 10/12/2022 20240 ROAD AND HIGHWAY BUILDING MATERIALS-MAINT & OPS $266.68 34948 10/26/2022 20441 ROAD AND HIGHWAY BUILDING MATERIALS-MAINT & OPS $254.83 $7,765.00Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD:

NV5, INC. 34830 10/12/2022 291622 ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES - JUL. 2022 $20,781.82 $126,170.16Remit to: HOLLYWOOD, FL FYTD:

ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 34831 10/12/2022 S6830544.003 (5) 75KVA TRANSFORMERS FOR MVU INVENTORY $22,215.41 $44,298.77Remit to: OCEANSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 50 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
ORNELAS, MADISON 34833 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND

SERVICES LLC
244341 10/19/2022 30643 BEAUTIFY MV SIGN POSTS, ANCHORS, SLEEVES, DRIVE RIVETS, & BRACES
$9,030.36
10/19/2022 30895 3/8" STEEL DRIVE RIVETS
$30,827.11Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

PACIFIC WEST, LLC , C/O
PAULC.KING TRUST
244287 10/05/2022 BL#30091-YR2022 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT FOR BUSINESS LICENSE $96.68 $96.68Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD:

PADILLA, ALEXIS 34834 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244299 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

PAMELA D. CHAFFIN 34949 10/26/2022 10/24 - 10/27/22 TRAVEL PER DIEM & MILEAGE - CACEO CODE CONFERENCE $322.00 $322.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

PARRAL, DANIEL 244353 10/19/2022 R22-168288 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-RETURN ADOPTION, LICENSE FEE

RETURNED
$15.00
$15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

PARSONS TRANSPORTATION
GROUP, INC.
34835 10/12/2022 2210A012 SR60/MORENO BEACH PH 2 $864.89 $7,138.98Remit to: IRVINE, CA FYTD:

Page 51 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
PEPE'S TOWING 34836 10/12/2022 107760 EMERGENCY TOWING SERVICES FOR FLEET VEHICLE $430.00 34900 10/19/2022 22-1012-553 TOW SERVICES FOR GENERATOR REMOVAL-CITY YARD $1,023.00 10/19/2022 107431 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
$4,360.75Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

PERCEPTIVE ENTERPRISES, INC. 34837 10/12/2022 3796 PROFESSIONAL DBE/CPR CONSULTING SERVICES $18,858.00 10/12/2022 3785 PROFESSIONAL DBE/CPR CONSULTING SERVICES $33,264.00Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

PROFESSIONAL

COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
PCN
244370 10/26/2022 221100427 LIVE ANSWERING SERVICE FOR ROTATIONAL TOW PROGRAM $626.48 $2,789.15Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

PTS COMMUNICATIONS INC 34753 10/05/2022 2093268 PAY PHONE SERVICES-OCT. 2022 $128.28 $641.40Remit to: SAN RAMON, CA FYTD:

PUBLIC RISK, INNOVATION,

SOLUTIONS, AND MANAGEMENT
34901 10/19/2022 23990002 EXCESS WORKERS' COMP SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL LATE FEE $838.95 $268,511.95Remit to: FOLSOM, CA FYTD:

PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 34902 10/19/2022 131581 MOTOR HELMET COMMUNICATIONS KITS (2) $599.18 $599.18Remit to: TORRANCE, CA FYTD:

RAMIREZ, NATALY 34838 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 52 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
RAMOS, ROBERTO 34839 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-AMAZING MARTIAL ARTS & TAE KWON

DO CLASSES
$963.90
$4,239.90Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 53 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 34754 10/05/2022 02G6703660050 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL $869.22 10/05/2022 02G6703657413 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-BERC 10/05/2022 02G6703658235 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/05/2022 02G6703658237 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/05/2022 02G6703658271 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE 10/05/2022 02G6703658273 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 91 10/05/2022 02G6703657389 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 99 10/05/2022 02G6703660049 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/05/2022 02G6703660052 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/05/2022 02G6703660053 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/05/2022 02G6703660057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 10/05/2022 02G6703660056 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/05/2022 02G6703657407 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CRC 10/05/2022 02G6703657409 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/05/2022 02G6703658274 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-MAIN LIBRARY 10/05/2022 02G6703657401 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-SENIOR CENTER 10/05/2022 02G6703148277 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 2 10/05/2022 02G6703657388 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 58 10/05/2022 02G6703657403 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 48 10/05/2022 02G6703660059 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 65 10/05/2022 02G6703657399 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 6 10/05/2022 02G6703657396 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/05/2022 02G6703657393 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/05/2022 02G6703657410 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/05/2022 02G6703660060 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-RAINBOW RIDGE 10/05/2022 02G6703686057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-EOC 10/05/2022 02G6703686058 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-VAL VERDE (RED MAPLE) SITE 10/05/2022 02G6703660054 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/05/2022 02G6705245066 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING

Page 54 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 34840 10/12/2022 02H6703660052 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL $863.91 10/12/2022 02H6703686057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-EOC 10/12/2022 02H6703660060 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-RAINBOW RIDGE 10/12/2022 02H6703660059 WATER DISPENSER UNITS RENTAL-FIRE STATION 65 10/12/2022 02H6703658235 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/12/2022 02H6703660057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD 10/12/2022 02H6703657388 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 58 10/12/2022 02H6703658273 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 91 10/12/2022 02H6703658274 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-MAIN LIBRARY 10/12/2022 02H6703657413 WATER DISPENSER UNITS RENTAL-BERC 10/12/2022 02H6703660050 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/12/2022 02H6703686058 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-VAL VERDE (RED MAPLE) SITE 10/12/2022 02H6703660056 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/12/2022 02H6703658271 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE 10/12/2022 02H6703660054 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/12/2022 02H6703657396 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/12/2022 02H6703658237 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/12/2022 02H6703660049 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/12/2022 02H6703657389 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 99 10/12/2022 02H6703657407 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CRC 10/12/2022 02H6703657393 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/12/2022 02H6705245066 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/12/2022 02H6703657399 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 6 10/12/2022 02H6703657401 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-SENIOR CENTER 10/12/2022 02H6703657403 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 48 10/12/2022 02H6703657409 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/12/2022 02H6703657410 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/12/2022 02H6703660053 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL

Page 55 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 34841 10/12/2022 02I0035449305 BOTTLED WATER, DELIVERY & RENTAL-CREEKSIDE

ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE
$103.94
10/12/2022 02I0035449404 BOTTLED WATER-SUNNYMEAD ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE 10/12/2022 02I0035449180 BOTTLED WATER, DELIVERY & RENTAL-ARMADA

ELEMENTARY/CHILD CARE

Page 56 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
READY REFRESH BY NESTLE 34904 10/19/2022 02I6703660057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD $976.03 10/19/2022 02I6703657407 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CRC 10/19/2022 02I6703658237 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/19/2022 02I6703658274 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-MAIN LIBRARY 10/19/2022 02I6703657389 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 99 10/19/2022 02I6703657393 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/19/2022 02I6703657396 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/19/2022 02I6703657399 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 6 10/19/2022 02I6703657401 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-SENIOR CENTER 10/19/2022 02I6703657403 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 48 10/19/2022 02I6703657410 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/19/2022 02I6703657409 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-ANNEX 1 10/19/2022 02I6703658271 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY YARD SANTIAGO OFFICE 10/19/2022 02I6703658235 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/19/2022 02I6703657388 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 02I6703660056 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6705245066 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 10/19/2022 02I6703686058 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-VAL VERDE (RED MAPLE) SITE 10/19/2022 02I6703686057 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-EOC 10/19/2022 02I6703657413 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-BERC 10/19/2022 02I6703660059 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 65 10/19/2022 02I6703658273 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-FIRE STATION 91 10/19/2022 02I6703660053 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6703660052 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6703660050 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6703660049 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6703660054 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 02I6703660060 WATER DISPENSER UNIT RENTAL-RAINBOW RIDGE

Page 57 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
$3,556.24Remit to: LOUISVILLE, KY FYTD:

REGALADO, BLANCA E 34842 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-FOLKLORIC DANCE ADULT & YOUTH

CLASSES
$717.60
$2,317.80Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

REYES, ALEJANDRA 34843 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244300 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

RHYTHM TECH PRODUCTIONS,
LLC
34905 10/19/2022 894 SERVICE CALL TO REFOCUS/REPROGRAM LIGHTING & AUDIO SYSTEM ETC.
$3,120.00
34951 10/26/2022 833 SOUND ENGINEER TO OPERATE AUDIO FOR EVENT ON 8/18/22 AT CRC
$450.00
$13,691.20Remit to: COLTON, CA FYTD:

RIVERA, JOCELYN 34844 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Riverside Community Housing
Corporation, Housing Authority
of Riverside County
244354 10/19/2022 BL#40747-YR2022 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT FOR BUSINESS LICENSE $65.00 $65.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT

CONSERVATION
244342 10/19/2022 3RD QTR 2022 STEPHEN'S KANGAROO RAT MITIGATION FEES FOR QTR ENDING 9/30/22
$11,565.00
$16,060.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

Page 58 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

ROADPOST USA INC DBA

BLUECOSMO
34952 10/26/2022 BU01507440 SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE PLAN-FIRE $545.40 $2,980.42Remit to: SEATTLE, WA FYTD:

RODRIGUEZ, ARISSA 244288 10/05/2022 R22-167886 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-LICENSE REFUND $15.00 $15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

ROGELIO SILVA 244391 10/26/2022 10/28/22 EVENT BAND PERFORMANCES FOR DAY OF THE DEAD EVENT ON 10/28/22
$2,500.00
$9,000.00Remit to: BELLFLOWER, CA FYTD:

RUBY INDUSTRIAL

TECHNOLOGIES, C/O ED

JOHNSON
244289 10/05/2022 BL#03615-YR2022 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT FOR BUSINESS LICENSE $13.00 $13.00Remit to: BLOOMFIELD, CT FYTD:

RUGAMAS, IVAN 244396 10/26/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $500.00 10/26/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022
$500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

RUGAMAS, TATIANA 34845 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

SAFEWAY SIGN CO. 34907 10/19/2022 53580 TRAFFIC SIGNS/HARDWARE $4,500.72 $21,403.56Remit to: ADELANTO, CA FYTD:

SAUCEDO, BIANCA 34846 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 244295 10/05/2022 SEPTEMBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-SEPTEMBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 59 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
SECURITY LOCK & KEY 244314 10/12/2022 31738 KEY COPIES-CITY HALL,COTTONWOOD, TOWNGATE CC $307.92 $1,171.67Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES, INC.

DBA SSD ALARM
34755 10/05/2022 R-00399548 ALARM SYSTEM SERVICES FOR MOVAL & KITCHING SUBSTATIONS-OCT. 2022
$464.85
$1,859.40Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

SICAIROS, BRITTANY 34847 10/12/2022 OCTOBER 2022 MOVAL LEARNS-OCTOBER 2022 $250.00 $500.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

SKY PUBLISHING 34848 10/12/2022 22.5_146 FULL PAGE MAGAZINE AD-FLOOD PLAIN MGMT PUBLIC SVC MSG/2022 ISS 5
$1,500.00
$3,000.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

SKY TRAILS MOBILE VILLAGE 34849 10/12/2022 Sept 2022 UUT REFUND FOR SEPT 2022 $5.99 $11.98Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 244271 10/05/2022 SEP-22 10/5/22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $3,577.86 244315 10/12/2022 SEP-22 10/12/22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $9,371.53 244371 10/26/2022 SEP-22 10/26/22 ELECTRICITY CHARGES $5,775.01 $985,819.64Remit to: ROSEMEAD, CA FYTD:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 244273 10/05/2022 AUG-2022 GAS CHARGES $3,722.08 244344 10/19/2022 SEP-2022 GAS CHARGES $4,900.69
$22,995.54Remit to: MONTEREY PARK, CA FYTD:

SOUTHERN PET SUPPLIES 34909 10/19/2022 9961 PET SUPPLIES-NYLON LEADS $150.00 $569.65Remit to: SAN DIEGO, CA FYTD:

Page 60 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1 35119 10/31/2022 3RD QTR 2022 SALES & USE TAX REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING 9/30/22 $813.00 $11,153.00Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF

JUSTICE
244274 10/05/2022 601746 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINTING APPS FOR PD-AUG. 2022 $2,963.00 244345 10/19/2022 608360 LIVE SCAN FINGERPRINTING APPS FOR PD-SEP. 2022 $2,544.00 $15,706.00Remit to: SACRAMENTO, CA FYTD:

STEVEN B. QUINTANILLA A

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
34757 10/05/2022 AUG-22/MILLER SPECIAL COUNSEL LITIGATION SVCS-MILLER STARR REG. 8/01- 8/31/22
$15,590.94
$563,196.98Remit to: PALM SPRINGS, CA FYTD:

STEVEN PERRY PROFESSIONAL

PHOTOGRAPHY
34851 10/12/2022 220917.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 09/15/22 - EL GRITO EVENT $639.38 10/12/2022 220928.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 09/28/22 - FOREVER 21 DONATION

CEREMONY
34910 10/19/2022 221005.2 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/04/22 - MOVAL SPECIAL

PRESENTATION EVENT
$547.50
10/19/2022 221005.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/04/22 - FIRE DEPT. PHOTOSHOOT 10/19/2022 221006.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/06/22 - MOVAL JOB FAIR 34953 10/26/2022 221015.1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 10/14/22 - MORRISON PARK PHOTO SHOOT
$72.50
$4,752.76Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

STEVE'S TOWING INC. 34756 10/05/2022 132945 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $420.00 $420.00Remit to: LAKE ELSINORE, CA FYTD:

Page 61 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
STILES ANIMAL REMOVAL, INC. 244316 10/12/2022 2550 DECEASED LARGE ANIMAL REMOVAL SERVICES-SEP. 2022 $1,435.00 $7,750.00Remit to: GUASTI, CA FYTD:

SUNNYMEAD ACE HARDWARE 244275 10/05/2022 96232 MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PD $122.72 244346 10/19/2022 96231 MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PD $6.44
$858.41Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

THE HOLE IN WALL INC. 34920 10/19/2022 OCT. 13, 2022 DONATION - COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY FUNDS CONTRIBUTION $250.00 $250.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

THE UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES

CORPORATION AT CSUSB
244317 10/12/2022 SP0012002 SPONSORSHIP FOR IE SMALL BUSINESS BUSINESS DEV. CTR. 2022- PMT #1
$8,500.00
$8,500.00Remit to: SAN BERNARDINO, CA FYTD:

THERMAL-COOL INC. 244390 10/26/2022 WO-0020463 HVAC MAINTENANCE & CONDENSOR COIL CLEANER - LASSELLE

SPORTS PARK
$679.00
10/26/2022 WO-0020550 HVAC SERVICE, BOLT, & REFRIGERANT - LASSELLE SPORTS PARK 10/26/2022 WO-0020490 HVAC MAINTENANCE SERVICE - SUNNYMEAD PARK SNACK BAR $679.00Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

THOMPSON COBURN LLP 34759 10/05/2022 3566465 LEGAL SERVICES-MVU/RELIABILITY STANDARD COMPLIANCE/AUG. 2022
$39.08
$164.41Remit to: WASHINGTON, DC FYTD:

THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
PUBLISHING CORP.
34911 10/19/2022 847127856 AUTO TRACK SERVICES FOR PD INVESTIGATIONS-SEP. 2022 $1,295.14 $5,180.56Remit to: CAROL STREAM, IL FYTD:

Page 62 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
TIME WARNER CABLE 244318 10/12/2022 091922301090122 FIBER INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES - SEP. 2022 $844.00 $2,532.00Remit to: PITTSBURGH, PA FYTD:

TITAN RENTAL GROUP, INC. 244319 10/12/2022 RES# 44272-FINAL RENTAL OF CANOPY, TABLES, CHAIRS, ETC. FOR EL GRITO EVENT $3,231.46 10/12/2022 RES# 44264-FINAL RENTAL OF CANOPY, TABLES, CHAIRS, ETC. FOR JULY 4TH 2022 EVENT
244372 10/26/2022 RES# 44814-FINAL RENTAL OF LED UPLIGHTS FOR STATE OF CITY EVENT 8/23/22 $138.60 $4,031.81Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 244276 10/05/2022 9507528742 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD $375.00 10/05/2022 9506607277 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD 10/05/2022 9508329625 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD 10/05/2022 9509433159 CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY EXTRACTION/LOCATOR SERVICES FOR PD $2,910.00Remit to: SEATTLE, WA FYTD:

TORRES, MARIA 244327 10/12/2022 R22-167039 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $95.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

TOUCH OF SOUL 34853 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES - SOUL LINE DANCING CLASS $464.40 $1,315.80Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. 34760 10/05/2022 18865 CONSULTING SERVICES-LOBBYIST/ADVOCATE & GRANT WRITING- SEP. 2022
$4,000.00
34955 10/26/2022 18980 CONSULTING SERVICES-LOBBYIST/ADVOCATE & GRANT WRITING- OCT. 2022
$4,000.00
$20,000.00Remit to: NEWPORT BEACH, CA FYTD:

TRB AND ASSOCIATES 34854 10/12/2022 4422 PERMIT TECHNICIAN CONSULTANT SERVICES (LDD)-AUG. 2022 $11,342.50 $24,213.30Remit to: SAN RAMON, CA FYTD:

Page 63 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
TRICHE, TARA 34855 10/12/2022 SEP. 2022 INSTRUCTOR SERVICES-BALLET/DANCE EXPLORATION CLASSES $1,566.00 $3,692.70Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

TSG ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA THE

SOLIS GROUP
34956 10/26/2022 9525 $14,982.00
10/26/2022 9372
10/26/2022 9371
10/26/2022 9527
10/26/2022 9526
10/26/2022 9370
PVT REHAB (CDBG FY 21/22)
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB FY 21/22
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB PROG (FY 21-26)
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB FY 21/22
CITYWIDE PVT REHAB PROG (FY 21-26) PVT
REHAB (CDBG FY 21/22)
$22,058.00Remit to: PASADENA, CA FYTD:

TUMON BAY RESORT & SPA 34957 10/26/2022 NOV. 2022 RENT NOV. 2022 RENT (INCL. CAM, ETC) FOR BUSINESS & EMP.

RESOURCE CTR
$8,152.37
$32,609.48Remit to: TAMUNING, GU FYTD:

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 244277 10/05/2022 025-380097 MYCIVICAPP SMARTPHONE APP SUBSCRIPTION 7/1/22 - 6/30/23 $6,945.75 $6,945.75Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD:

U.S. BANK NA 34762 10/05/2022 13417473 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAL SERVICES-AUG. 2022 $925.00 $3,650.00Remit to: ST. PAUL, MN FYTD:

Page 64 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT

OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
34856 10/12/2022 720220465 (d) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-JUL. 2022 $342.50 10/12/2022 720220465 (c) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-JUL. 2022 10/12/2022 720220465 (a) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-JUL. 2022 10/12/2022 720220465 (b) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-JUL. 2022 34857 10/12/2022 820220477 (b) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-AUG. 2022 $466.75 10/12/2022 820220477 (c) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 820220477 (d) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-AUG. 2022 10/12/2022 820220477 (a) DIGALERT TICKETS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE-AUG. 2022 244320 10/12/2022 22-2300276 (b) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
$84.03
10/12/2022 22-2300276 (c) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
10/12/2022 22-2300276 (d) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
10/12/2022 22-2300276 (a) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
244321 10/12/2022 22-2300692 (c) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
$84.03
10/12/2022 22-2300692 (b) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
10/12/2022 22-2300692 (d) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
10/12/2022 22-2300692 (a) CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS TO SAFE EXCAVATION BOARD
$1,754.14Remit to: CORONA, CA FYTD:

UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA, INC. 34858 10/12/2022 114-13367402 FENCE RENTAL AT ANIMAL SHELTER 09/22-10/19/22 $106.40 $425.60Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD:

Page 65 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

VACATE TERMITE & PEST

ELIMINATION COMPANY
34859 10/12/2022 119265 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT SERVICE-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. $2,160.00 10/12/2022 117601 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. 10/12/2022 117416 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-FIRE STATION 99 10/12/2022 119259 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT SERVICE-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/12/2022 119128 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 10/12/2022 119122 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT SERVICE-TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER
10/12/2022 119175 INTERIOR PEST CONTROL-CITY YARD SANTIAGO 10/12/2022 118764 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-MARCH FIELD PARK COMM CENTER 10/12/2022 118104 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/12/2022 118085 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-MARCH FIELD PARK COMM CENTER 10/12/2022 117417 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-FIRE STATION 2 10/12/2022 117923 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-FIRE STATION 91 10/12/2022 117838 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT FLY LIGHT INSTAL & SERVICE-CITY YARD PERRIS
10/12/2022 117713 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-CITY YARD PERRIS 10/12/2022 117693 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/12/2022 118388 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-CITY HALL
10/12/2022 118515 NON-ROUTINE PEST SERVICE-FIRE STATION 48

Page 66 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

VACATE TERMITE & PEST

ELIMINATION COMPANY
10/19/2022 118440 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 6 10/19/2022 119073 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 48 10/19/2022 118657 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-CITY YARD 10/19/2022 118658 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT TRAP/FLY LIGHT SERVICE-CITY YARD 10/19/2022 118659 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-TRANSPORTATION TRAILER 10/19/2022 118663 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-MAIN LIBRARY 10/19/2022 118575 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 6 10/19/2022 118666 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-MARCH ANNEX 10/19/2022 118574 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 2 10/19/2022 119065 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 6 10/19/2022 119093 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-MAIN LIBRARY 10/19/2022 119083 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 99 10/19/2022 119079 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 119077 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 2 10/19/2022 117998 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-CITY YARD 10/19/2022 118665 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-MARCH FIELD PARK CC 10/19/2022 118368 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 2 10/19/2022 118196 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-CONFERENCE & REC. CENTER 10/19/2022 118199 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-EMERGENCY OPS CENTER 10/19/2022 118201 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 118220 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/19/2022 118273 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 118576 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 65 10/19/2022 118366 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 91 10/19/2022 118571 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 99 10/19/2022 118371 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 48 10/19/2022 118399 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. 10/19/2022 119269 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-CITY HALL

Page 67 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount

VACATE TERMITE & PEST

ELIMINATION COMPANY
10/19/2022 118004 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-TOWNGATE COMM. CENTER 10/19/2022 119422 MOSQUITO ABATEMENT TRAP/FLY LIGHT SERVICE-ANIMAL

SHELTER
10/19/2022 118573 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 118364 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 99 10/19/2022 119267 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-EMERGENCY OPS. CENTER 10/19/2022 118669 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-SENIOR CENTER 10/19/2022 119125 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-MARCH FIELD PARK COMM.

CENTER
10/19/2022 119127 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-SENIOR CENTER 10/19/2022 118570 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 91 10/19/2022 119139 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-CITY YARD 10/19/2022 119123 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-TOWNGATE COMM CENTER 10/19/2022 119104 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 119266 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. 10/19/2022 119141 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-TRANSPORTATION TRAILER 10/19/2022 119271 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/19/2022 119272 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-COTTONWOOD GOLF CENTER 10/19/2022 117891 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUN. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 119321 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 118675 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-TOWNGATE COMM. CENTER 10/19/2022 119142 MOSQUITO FLY LIGHT SERVICE-CITY YARD
10/19/2022 119096 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-FIRE STATION 65 10/19/2022 118917 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 58 10/19/2022 118916 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-FIRE STATION 48 10/19/2022 118727 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. 10/19/2022 118195 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-COTTONWOOD GOLF CENTER 10/19/2022 118684 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-ANIMAL SHELTER

Page 68 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000

VACATE TERMITE & PEST

ELIMINATION COMPANY
10/19/2022 119124 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-MARCH ANNEX Payment Amount
10/19/2022 118680 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-EMERGENCY OPS CENTER 10/19/2022 118679 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-CITY HALL 10/19/2022 118677 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-CONFERENCE & REC CENTER 10/19/2022 119258 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-SEPT. 2022-ANIMAL SHELTER 10/19/2022 117995 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-SENIOR CENTER 10/19/2022 117999 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-TRANSPORTATION TRAILER 10/19/2022 118001 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-MARCH ANNEX 10/19/2022 118002 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-MARCH FIELD COMM. CENTER 10/19/2022 118676 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-AUG. 2022-COTTONWOOD GOLF CENTER
10/19/2022 118022 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-JUL. 2022-MAIN LIBRARY $17,250.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

VALDIVIA, CELESTE 244355 10/19/2022 2002878.047 DEPOSIT REFUND- TOWNGATE COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL $209.60 $209.60Remit to: RIVERSIDE, CA FYTD:

VALENZUELA, OSCAR 244328 10/12/2022 R22-167552 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER DEPOSIT $75.00 $75.00Remit to: PERRIS, CA FYTD:

VALLEY WIDE TOWING, LLC 34913 10/19/2022 22-12310 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD $1,433.25 10/19/2022 22-12362 EVIDENCE TOWING FOR PD
$7,302.75Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC. 34764 10/05/2022 CD2208996 SOUTH COAST LIGHTING & DESIGN FOR HOUND TOWN DOG PARK
$11,593.90
$11,593.90Remit to: CHICAGO, IL FYTD:

Page 69 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
VERIZON WIRELESS 244278 10/05/2022 9915493391 DATA CHARGES FOR CELLULAR SERVICE FOR PD DEVICES $573.84 $2,097.71Remit to: DALLAS, TX FYTD:

VICTOR MEDICAL CO 34914 10/19/2022 5600089 ANIMAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES/VACCINES $137.04 $8,721.63Remit to: LAKE FOREST, CA FYTD:

VISTA PAINT CORPORATION 34765 10/05/2022 2022-716063-00 TRAFFIC PAINT SUPPLIES - GLASS BEADS $2,934.89 10/05/2022 2022-629717-00 TRAFFIC PAINT
34915 10/19/2022 2022-718052-00 ON-LINE TRAFFIC FAST DRY YELLOW PAINT $15,755.24 10/19/2022 2022-724691-00 ON-LINE TRAFFIC FAST DRY PAINT-YELLOW & BLACK 10/19/2022 2022-716786-00 ON-LINE TRAFFIC FAST DRY WHITE PAINT $49,049.32Remit to: FULLERTON, CA FYTD:

VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEM, INC. 34916 10/19/2022 8692116152239 CNG FUEL PURCHASES $8,997.59 $48,271.64Remit to: HOUSTON, TX FYTD:

WAXIE ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA

WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
34766 10/05/2022 81210062 JANITORIAL/CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR LIBRARY BRANCHES $265.33 34860 10/12/2022 81223638 JANITORIAL/CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR LIBRARY BRANCHES $347.85 10/12/2022 81068631 JANITORIAL/CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR LIBRARY BRANCHES 34917 10/19/2022 81217024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PD $126.07 $4,406.85Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

WELLS FARGO CORPORATE TRUST 34927 10/18/2022 W221007 DEBT SERVICE - CFD NO. 87-1 TOWNGATE IMPR AREA NO.1 $16,219.96 34958 10/26/2022 2144043 TRUSTEE FEES - 2021 TAXABLE LRB $3,000.00 $4,388,436.32Remit to: LOS ANGELES, CA FYTD:

Page 70 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. 34767 10/05/2022 189759 SD TREE TRIMING/REMOVAL FY 22/23 $1,870.77 34918 10/19/2022 191087 TREE & STUMP REMOVAL SERVICES - MAINT. & OPERATIONS

DIVISION
$6,937.30
10/19/2022 191093 SD TREE & STUMP REMOVAL SERVICES - ZONE 09 10/19/2022 190919 SD TREE & STUMP REMOVAL SERVICES - ZONE D $33,166.67Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

WEST COAST SHOPPING CART
SERVICE, INC.
244373 10/26/2022 22-044 SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL SERVICES-SEP. 2022 $3,425.50 $16,456.00Remit to: WEST COVINA, CA FYTD:

WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER

DISTRICT
244374 10/26/2022 24753-018620/SP2 WATER CHARGES-M.A.R.B. BALLFIELDS $5,025.30 10/26/2022 23866-018292/SP2 WATER CHARGES-SKATE PARK
10/26/2022 23821-018258/SP2 WATER CHARGES-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR.-BLDG. 938
10/26/2022 23821-018257/SP2 WATER CHARGES-MARCH FIELD PARK COMMUNITY CTR.

LANDSCAPE
$23,353.23Remit to: ARTESIA, CA FYTD:

Page 71 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 34861 10/12/2022 00713635 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES-AUG. 2022/NSP CLOSEOUT, ETC.
$3,772.50
10/12/2022 00713582 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES-MAY 2022/NSP CLOSEOUT, ETC.
10/12/2022 00713620 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES-JUL. 2022/NSP CLOSEOUT, ETC.
34960 10/26/2022 002-27355 CODE ENF.-SUBSTANDARD HOUSING INSPECTION SERVICES - SEPT. 2022
$2,800.00
34961 10/26/2022 00713648 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES-SEP. 2022/NSP CLOSEOUT, ETC.
$4,195.00
$275,541.74Remit to: ANAHEIM, CA FYTD:

WILMINGTON TRUST 34928 10/17/2022 W221006 DEBT SERVICE - STONERIDGE CFD NO. 5 SPECIAL TAXES $18,045.21 $18,045.21Remit to: WILMINGTON, DE FYTD:

WOLTERS KLUWER 34768 10/05/2022 5413235643 PDFLYER STANDALONE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 8/1/22- 7/31/23
$2,270.10
$3,680.10Remit to: TORRANCE, CA FYTD:

WORKABILITY 1 REGION 5 244356 10/19/2022 2002882.047 DEPOSIT REFUND- CONFERENCE & REC CTR. $524.10 $524.10Remit to: SAN JACINTO, CA FYTD:

ZAPANTA, SHARMAINE 244389 10/26/2022 R22-168343 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-RETURN ADOPTION, REFUND LICENSE FEE
$15.00
$15.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

ZHANG, JING 244290 10/05/2022 R22-167898 ANIMAL SERVICES REFUND-SPAY/NEUTER AND RABIES DEPOSITS $95.00 $95.00Remit to: MORENO VALLEY, CA FYTD:

Page 72 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022) Vendor Name Check/EFT
Number
Payment
Date Inv Number Invoice Description
City of Moreno Valley
Payment Register
For Period 10/1/2022 through 10/31/2022
CHECKS UNDER $25,000
Payment Amount
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 34862 10/12/2022 97264 BEAUTIFY MOVAL ADOPTION ALUMINUM PLAQUE DECALS $1,533.71 $1,533.71Remit to: SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA FYTD:

TOTAL CHECKS UNDER $25,000
GRAND TOTAL $15,231,985.19
$936,335.12

Page 73 of 73 ends

A.8.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: 2022_OctoberPaymentRegister (6026 : OCTOBER PAYMENT REGISTER 2022)

Report to City Council

ID#6019 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Manuel A. Mancha, Community Development Director

AGENDA DATE: December 20, 2022

TITLE: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE,

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37858
TO SUBDIVIDE A 4.81 -ACRE PROJECT SITE IN TO 37

SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council consider the Appeal filed by RC Hobbs Company, (the “Appellant”) appealing the Planning Commission’s denial of the Appellant’s application for a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map to facilitate a 37 -lot single -family residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), located North of Cactus Avenue, East of Moreno Beach Drive, and take any action the City Council deems appropriate.

Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022 -XX, attached hereto, DENYING Appeal PAA22-0004.

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022-XX, attached hereto:

1. ADOPTING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment (PEN20 -0174), Change of Zone (PEN20 -0175); Tentative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20 -0172), and Conditional Use Permit (PEN20-0173) for a Planned Unit Development, on file with the Community Development Department, incorporated herein by this reference, which was completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and reflects that the Planning Commission and City reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study/Mit igated Negative Declaration, and F.1
Packet Pg. 140

Page 2 ends

exercised its independent judgment and analysis of the Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts; and

2. ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Proposed Project, which consists of a Conditional Use Permit (PEN20 - 0173) for a Planned Unit Development and Tentative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20-0172) pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022 -XX, attached hereto, APPROVING Appeal PAA22-0004:

1. APPROVING General Plan Amend ment (PEN20 -0174) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022 -XX and any necessary and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect the proposed changes in the zoning classification and/or redistricting associated with the General Plan Amendment.

2. APPROVING Conditional Use Permit (PEN20-0173) and Tentative Tract Map (PEN20-0172) based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-XX.

3. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. [next in order] approving Change of Zone (PEN20-0175) and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas and the conditions of approval, based on the Recitals, Evidence and Findings contain ed in the Administrative Record of the proceedings.

BACKGROUND

The Appellant submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone (CZ), Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to facilitate a 37-lot single-family residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) with 5 lettered lots on a 4.81 -acre project site. The purpose of the PUD is to establish flexible standards to encourage innovation in housing types and provide amenities not generally found in suburban subdivis ions, such as common open spaces and recreational areas. The GPA, along with the CZ, will allow for the change of the current land use designation from Residential 5 to Residential 10 and the zoning designation from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residenti al Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, which allows for a maximum density of 10 dwelling units per acre. The GPA, CZ, CUP, and TTM together constitute the “Proposed Project”.

The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation to Residential (R10) with a Zone Change to change the zoning designation to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, as well as a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) for a 4.81-acre site that will be subdivided into 37 single-family residential lots, on the Northside of Cactus Avenue, East of Moreno Beach Drive (“Project Site”).

On November 10, 2022, the Proposed Project was considered by the Planning F.1
Packet Pg. 141

Page 3 ends

Commission upon a d uly noticed public hearing. The Planning Commission voted to deny the requested General Plan Amendment, which effectively resulted in rejecting the Proposed Project, since approval of the General Plan Amendment (PEN20 -0174) is a prerequisite to approving t he Proposed Project’s Change of Zone (PEN20 -0175), Conditional Use Permit (PEN20-0173), and Tentative Parcel Map (PEN20-0172).

The General Plan Amendment was denied based on the following findings:

1. That the Proposed Project is inconsistent with the City’ s current MoVal 2040 General Plan because the proposed density increase is inconsistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, policies and programs and does not comply with the applicable zoning standards.

2. The Proposed Project will adversely affect t he public health, safety, or general welfare in that the increased density would result in increased traffic and potential for accidents, especially due to the proximity of the Proposed Project to highl y trafficked roads.

Pursuant to MVMC Section 9.02.240 (Appeals), the Appellant has provided a letter attached to this report stating the specific reasons for the appeal and providing justification for: 1) the proposed projects consistency with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan; and 2) how the Proposed Project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare.

SCOPE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW:

Pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code (MVMC) Section 9.02.040 (General Plan Amendments), the authority for approval of general plan amendments shall be vested in the City Council. However, Section 9.02.040 further provides that the Planning Commission’s action recommending disapproval of proposed general plan amendment, regardless of how such amendment was initiated, s hall be final unless appealed to the City Council within fifteen (15) consecutive calendar days after the Planning Commission’s recommended disapproval. The Planning Commission’s action was taken on November 10, 2022, and the Appellant filed its appeal on November 17, 2022, within the 15-day appeal period.

Section 9.02.040 provides that the City Council may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove any proposed General Plan Amendment. However, prior to any final City Council action regarding the G eneral Plan Amendment, if there is any substantial modification proposed by the City Council that was not previously considered by the Planning Commission, the proposed substantial modification must first be referred to the Planning Commission for its recommendation.

Finally, if the City Council is inclined to approve the proposed General Plan Amendment (approving the appeal), it must make the following findings:

1. That the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the general plan; and F.1
Packet Pg. 142

Page 4 ends

2. That the proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Proposed Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation to Residential (R10) with a Zone Change to change the zoning designation to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, as well as a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) for a 4.81-acre site that will be subdivided into 37 single-family residential lots, on the Northside of Cactus Avenue, East of Moreno Beach Drive.

General Plan Amendment
A General Plan Amendment (GPA) application was submitted to change the land use designation of the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10). The R10 land use designation is intended to provide for a variety of residential products and to encourage innovation in housing types with amenities not generally found in suburb an subdivisions, such as common open spaces and recreational areas. The R10 land use designation allows for a maximum density of 10.0 dwelling units per acre.

Change of Zone
A Change of Zone (CZ) application was submitted to rezone the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District. Under the Proposed Project’s current Residential (R5) District, a maximum of 5.0 units per gross acre is allowed, but as proposed the Proposed Project would allow for 7.9 units per gross acre. To obtain the desired units per gross acre a CZ is required to rezone the project site to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District, which allows up to 10.0 units per gross acre, thereby allowing the proposed 7.9 units. The Residential Singl e-Family 10 (RS10) zoning district is intended to provide residential development on small single - family lots with amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions and allows a maximum density of 10 units per acre.

Planned Unit Development
The Propos ed Project includes a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows for the proposed development to establish unique criteria for such things as setbacks, lot width and depth, building separation, and lot size. Flexible development standards are allowed in exchange for a higher level of detail and amenities within the Proposed Project than typically are required for standard residential development. As proposed, the Proposed Project is consistent with the standards of Moren o Valley Municipal Code (MVMC) Section 9.03.060, which outlines PUDs.

PUDs encourage housing that is varied by type, design, form of ownership, and size.

The Proposed Project offers three architectural styles (Spanish, French, and Traditional) F.1
Packet Pg. 143

Page 5 ends

and floor plans with varying building designs and rooflines. The newly formed residential lots will range in size from 3,040 to 5,016 square feet.

Tentative Tract Map
The proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 37858 has been designed consistent with the PUD standards an d will subdivide three contiguous parcels totaling 4.81 -acre, into 37 single-family residential lots and 4 lettered lots. As proposed, the lettered lots will be used for bioretention basins (Lots A and B), a 3 -foot-wide drainage ditch (Lot C) located on th e eastern property line, a landscape easement (Lot D) located along the south perimeter boundary line, and an open space lot (Lot E) located approximately in the middle of the proposed development. The Proposed Project complies with the City’s development standards for a TTM.

Site/Surrounding Area
The Project Site is approximately 4.81 -acres, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue.

Surrounding land uses to the north of the Proposed Project are developed wit h a combination of vacant and unimproved or developed with existing single -family residential dwellings within the Residential 5 (R5) District, Residential Single Family 10 (RS10) District, Residential 10 (R10) District, and Specific Plan 193 Medium Low Density Residential designation.

Access/Parking
The Proposed Project’s vehicular access will be provided via two driveways on Bradshaw Circle, which then provide access to internal roadways. Access to the dwelling units will be provided by private driveways accessed by internal roads. The Proposed Project provides pedestrian paths for non -vehicular onsite circulation and for connection to existing sidewalks and bike lanes adjacent to the Proposed Project.

The Proposed Project will also provide garages, drive ways, and on-street parking. Each residence includes a two-car garage, with a minimum of two driveway parking spaces.

Design/Landscaping
The PUD guidelines will include three different two -story floor plans and three different architecture styles: Spanish , French, or Traditional, with multi -level rooflines, and an earth-tone color scheme. Exterior designs will include stucco finishes, detailed roof elements, awnings, metal railings, and decorative windows and doors.

The PUD includes typical plot plan confi gurations for the new homes and typical front yard landscaping. The HOA shall perform all common area maintenance to ensure well - maintained appearance of the streetscapes throughout the Project Site. A conceptual landscape plan incorporated in the PUD show s the typical street trees along all public streets, shade trees around the 10,983 square-foot of common/recreation area located near the center of the residential development. The amenities for this recreation area F.1
Packet Pg. 144

Page 6 ends

include a basketball court, an outdoor g athering area with barbeque grills and benches, a playground, and enhanced landscape walkways.

Outdoor lighting will consist of wall -mounted lighting as well as pole -mounted lights along the proposed internal roads. And the proposed common/recreation are a will have accent/security lighting throughout.

REVIEW PROCESS
All appropriate outside agencies have considered the Proposed Project part of the standard review process. The Proposed Project was reviewed by the Project Review Staff Committee as required by the Municipal Code. Following subsequent revisions and reviews by staff, the Proposed Project was determined to be complete.

ENVIRONMENTAL
An Initial Study was prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc. in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study examined the potential impacts of the Proposed Project. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) provides information in support of the finding that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) se rves as the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project. With the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Technical studies prepared in support of the IS/MN D include the following: CalEEMod Emissions Summary, Habitat Assessment and Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and MSHCP Consistency, Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview, Preliminary Soil Investigation , Infiltration Tests and L iquefaction Evaluation Report , Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Preliminary Hydrology Report, Preliminary Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, Noise Impact Analysis, and Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis. Copies of the appendices to the IS/MND can be accessed from the link attached to this staff report. The documents may also be reviewed at City Hall.

Mitigation measures are recommended for the Proposed Project in the following areas:

Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, and T ribal Cultural Resources, all of which are incorporated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The measures for cultural resources have been included to address input from the Tribal governments. The measures are intended to ensure that potential cultural resources that might be discovered are protected. However, these measures are not required to address a known significant impact. Based on the Initial Study, and the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not cause a si gnificant impact to the environment.

The public comment period for the Notice of Availability of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration began on October 13, 2022 and ended on November 2, 2022 (State Clearing House Number 2022100288), which satisfies the required 20-day review period required for the Proposed Project. As of the preparation of this staff report, no comments have been received regarding the environmental documents.

F.1
Packet Pg. 145

Page 7 ends

REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS
Staff has coordinated with outside agencies where applicable, as is the standard review process for these development applications.

ALTERNATIVE

1. Uphold the Planning Commission’s decision to deny the Proposed Project.

2. Overrule the Planning Commission’s decision; adopt the Resolution adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation monitoring and Reporting Program; adopt the Resolution approving General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0174); adopt the Ordinance approving Change of Zone (PEN20 -0175); adopt the Resolution approving Condition al Use Permit (PEN20 -0173) and Tentative Tract Map (PEN20 -0172) based on the findings set forth in the above - reference Resolutions and the Administrative Record.

NOTIFICATION
Consistent with the City Municipal Code provisions, public notice was sent to all property owners of record within 600 feet of the Project Site, posted on the Project Site, and published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper, in accordance with Government Code 65905. As of the preparation of this staff report, one public comment has been received regarding the proposed project.

FISCAL IMPACT

Not Applicable

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT

Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Danielle Harper-Scott Manuel A. Mancha
Associate Planner Community Development Director

Concurred By:

Sean P. Kelleher
Planning Official

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects . Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the develop ment of Moreno Valley's future.

F.1
Packet Pg. 146

Page 8 ends

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced ne ighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Appeal Letter

2. Resolution No. 2022-XX - Denying Appeal PAA22-0004

3. Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND

4. Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND

5. Appendix A - CalEEMod Emission Summary

6. Appendix B - Habitat Assessment & Focused Surveys

7. Appendix C - Cultural Assessment

8. Appendix D - Preliminary Soil Investigation

9. Appendix E - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

10. Appendix F - Preliminary Hydrology Report

11. Appendix G - Preliminary WQMP

12. Appendix H - Noise Impact Analysis

13. Appendix I -Trip Generation & VMT Memo

14. Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2022 -XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)

15. Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022 -XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)

16. Resolution No. 2022-XX - Approving Appeal PAA22 0004

17. Ordinance No. XXX - Change of Zone

18. Project Plans

19. Planning Commission Public Comments

F.1
Packet Pg. 147

Page 9 ends

APPROVALS

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 12/13/22 6:08 PM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 12/14/22 8:54 AM F.1
Packet Pg. 148
F.1.a
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Appeal Letter (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) F.1.a
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Appeal Letter (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 1 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL PAA22-0004 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT PEN 20-0174 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND

USE MAP, CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
RESIDENTIAL 5 (R5) TO RESIDENTIAL 10 (R10) FOR THE PROPERTY

LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF CACTUS AVENUE EAST OF
MORENO BEACH DRIVE (APN’S 478-090- 018, 478-090-024, AND 478- 090-025)
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California , and has the authority to approve amendments to the City’s General Plan and the City’s Zoning Atlas; and WHEREAS, RC Hobbs Company (“Applicant”) is proposing the development of a thirty-seven (37) lot, single -family residential development on 4.81 acres , commonly known as the Bradshaw Collection (the “Proposed Project”); and WHEREAS, the proposal is to construct the Proposed Project on land situated on the northeast side of Cactus Avenue east of Moreno Beach Drive (APN 478 -090-018, 478-090-024, and 478-090-025) (“Project Site”); and
WHEREAS, in part, t he Applicant has filed an applicat ion for the approval of General Plan Amendment PEN20-0174 (“Application”) requesting an amendment to the Moreno Valley General Plan from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10), which shall also require any necessary and corresponding amendments to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect th at zoning classification and/or redistricting of the Project Site shall retain consistency between the Zoning Atlas and the General Plan land use designations; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2022, the public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the Planning Commission at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, on November 10 , 202 2, the Planning Commission denied the proposed General Plan Amendment finding it inconsistent with the City’s General Plan; and would adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Applicant timely filed an appeal of the Plann ing Commission’s denial of the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of the Proposed Project, and considered the Proposed Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and F.1.b
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Denying Appeal PAA22-0004 [Revision 3] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 2 WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, upon a duly noticed public hearing the City Council afforded all interested persons an opportunity to testify and to present evidence; and
WHEREAS, on December 20 , 2022, the City Council d enied the Appeal (PAA22-0004) of the Planning Commission ’s denial of General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0174) finding the General Plan Amendment inconsistent with the existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan; and would adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all the evidence submitted into the Administrative Record related to the Project, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Moreno Valley General Plan and all other relevant provisions contained therein; (b) Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all other relevant provisions referenced therein;
(c) The Moreno Valley General Plan amendment changing the land use designation from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10) and all other relevant provisions contained therein as shown on Exhibit A; (d) Application for the approval of a General Plan Amendment PEN20 -0174 and all documents, records and references contained therein; (e) Staff Report prepared for the Planning Commission and City Council’s consideration and all documents, records and references related thereto, and Staff’s presentation at the public hearings;
(f) Testimony and/or comments from Applicant and its representatives during the public hearings; and
(g) Testimony and/or comments from all pers ons that was provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the public hearings.

Section 3. Findings
That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
(a) The requested General Plan Amendment is inconsistent with the existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan; and (b) The proposed General Plan amendment will adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare.

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Denying Appeal PAA22-0004 [Revision 3] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 3 Section 4. Denial of Appeal.

That based on the foregoing Recitals, Administrative Record and Findings, the City Council hereby denies the appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of a General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0174) to amend the General Plan Land Use Map, changing the land use d esignation from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10), and thereby denying the entire Proposed Project which is contingent upon the approval of the General Plan amendment.

Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions as heretofore adopted by the City Council that conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 6. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

F.1.b
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Denying Appeal PAA22-0004 [Revision 3] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS ___ day of _____________, 2022.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL

_____________________________
Ulises Cabrera,
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley

ATTEST:

_________________________
Jane Halstead,
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla,
Interim City Attorney
F.1.b
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Denying Appeal PAA22-0004 [Revision 3] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 1 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM FOR BRADSHAW COLLECTION PROJECT LOCATED ON

THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF CACTUS AVENUE EAST OF MORENO
BEACH DRIVE (APN’S 478-090-018, 478- 090-024, AND 478-090-025) WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for projects that are subject to requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA
1) and CEQA Guidelines2; and
WHEREAS, RC Hobbs Company (“Applicant”) has submitted applications for the Bradshaw Collection project which includes the proposed development of a 37 single- family lot residential project with associated public improvements (“ Proposed Project”), located on the north side of Cactus Avenue east of Moreno Beach Drive on approximately

4.81 acres (APN 478-090-018, 478-090-024, and 478-090-025) (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, the Proposed Project includes the General Plan Amendment (GPA) (PEN20-0174), Change of Zone (PEN20-0175), a Conditional Use Permit (PEN20-0173) for a Single-Family Planned Unit Development, and a Tentative Tract Map (PEN20-0175, and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas to reflect the proposed changes in the zoning classification and/or redistricting associated with the General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0174); and
WHEREAS, Planning Division Staff completed an Initial Study ( environmental assessment) (“IS”) for the Proposed Project and based on the environmental assessment, recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) in accordance with Section 6 (ND Procedures) of the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 – 15075; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was duly noticed and circulated for public review for a period of 3 0 days commencing on October 13, 2022, through November 2, 2022; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) , which is a program for reporting and monitoring the Proposed Projects’ mitigation measures, was prepared for the Proposed Project and circulated with the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2022, upon a duly noticed public hearing was 1 Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177
2 14 California Code of Regulations §§15000-15387
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 2 conducted by the Planning Commission to consider the approval of the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-1 to deny the General Plan Amendment, thereby denying the entire Proposed Project, which was contingent upon the approval of the General Plan amendment; and WHEREAS, the applicant filed a timely A ppeal Application ( PAA22-0004) appealing the Planning Commission’s denial of General Plan Amendment PEN20-0174:
and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, a duly noticed hearing was conducted by the City Council to consider the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, in the exercise of its own independent judgment, the City Council determined that the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will reduce the Proposed Project’s potential environmental to levels of insignificance and that there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment which would otherwise require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Reci tals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. Evi dence
That the City Council has considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the MND and MMRP, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Pr oposed Project, attached hereto as Exhibit A;
(b) Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit B;
(c) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit C; (d) Staff Reports prepared for the Planning Commission and City Council’s consideration
and all documents, records and references related thereto, and
Staff’s presentation at the public hearings;
(e) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that was provided in written format
or correspondence, at, or prior to, the public hearings.

Section 3. Findings
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 3 That based on the content of the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) That all environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, with the mitigation measures set forth in the MMRP , have been reduced to levels of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment that would otherwise require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report;
(b) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been completed in compliance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines and are consistent the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; (c) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City as lead agency for the Proposed Project; and
(d) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are adequate to serve as the required CEQA environmental documentation for the proposed Project.

Section 4. Adop
tion
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Administrative Record and Findings, the City Council hereby adopts the IS/MND attached hereto as Exhibits A, respectively, and the MMRP attached hereto as Exhibit C.

S
ection 5. R epeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions as heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 6. S everability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Effe
ctive Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption.

Section 8. Ce rtification
That the Secretary of the City Council shall certify to the passage of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th day of December 2022
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 4 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL
_________________________
Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez,
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
_________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk

APPROVED
AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla,
Interim City Attorney
Exhibits:

Exhibit A:

Exhibit B:

Exhibit C:

Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Monitoring
Mitigation and Reporting Program
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 5 Exhibit A

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 6 Exhibit B

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION F.1.c
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 7 Exhibit C

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
F.1.c
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) 8 F.1.c
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 5] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection)

Exhibit A

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection)

CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION FOR THE CACTUS &

BRADSHAW RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
(TTM 37858)
TTM 37858 Project - Case Numbers PEN20-0172 (Tentative Tract Map), PEN20-0174 (General Plan Amendment),
PEN20-0175 (Change of Zone), PEN20-0173 (Conditional
Use Permit)
October
13, 2022
Lead Agency

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Prepared By
EPD Solutions, Inc.
2355 Main Street, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 794-1180

WHERE OR EAMS SOA R
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project i City of Moreno Valley

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ....................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ................................ 1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ....................................... 27 DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency): ......................................... 27 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ........................................................ 28 ISSUES & SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES: ............................................... 29 I. AESTHETICS ............................................................................................... 29 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ......................................... 33 III. AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................ 34 VI. ENERGY ................................................................................................... 47 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................. 49 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................ 55 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................ 57 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would t he project: .................... 61 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING ..................................................................... 67 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would t he project: .......................................... 68 XIII. NOISE .................................................................................................... 69 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING .............................................................. 74 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................... 75 XVI. RECREATION ........................................................................................ 77 XVII. TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................. 78 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................... 81 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................... 84 XX. WILDFIRE .............................................................................................. 86 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ...................................... 88 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS .................................................... 90 TABLES

Table AES-1: Project Consistency with Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District Development Standards ................................................................................................ 30 Table AES-2: Consistency with Land Use Element Goals and Policies Related to Scenic Quality ........................................................................................................................... 30 Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds ...................................... 35 Table AQ-2: Construction Emissions Summary ............................................................ 36 Table AQ-3: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions ................................................. 36 Table AQ-4: Localized Significance Summary of Construction ..................................... 37 Table AQ-5: Localized Significance Summary of Operations ........................................ 38 Table E-1: Estimated Construction Equipment Diesel Fuel Consumption ..................... 47 Table E-2: Estimated Construction Vehicle Trip Related Fuel Consumption ................. 48 Table E-3: Estimated Annual Operational Energy Consumption ................................... 48 Table GHG-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................. 56 Table WQ-1: Total Retail Water Supply (AFY) .............................................................. 62 F.1.d
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project ii City of Moreno Valley Table N-1: City of Moreno Valley Maximum Continuous Sound Levels ........................ 69 Table N-2: Existing Ambient Noise Level Measurements .............................................. 70 Table N-3: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptor ..................... 70 Table N-4: Project Traffic Noise Contributions .............................................................. 71 Table N-5: Proposed Homes Interior Noise Levels from Cactus Avenue ...................... 72 Table N-5: Typical Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ...................... 72 Table T-1: Project Trip Generation ................................................................................ 79 FIGU
RES
Figure 1. Regional Location ............................................................................................ 8 Figure 2. Local Vicinity .................................................................................................. 10 Figure 3. Aerial .............................................................................................................. 12 Figure 4. General Plan Designation .............................................................................. 14 Figure 5. Zoning Designations ...................................................................................... 16 Figure 6: Conceptual Site Plan ...................................................................................... 18 Figure 7: Wall and Fence Plan ...................................................................................... 22 Figure 8: Landscape Plan ............................................................................................. 20 MITIG
ATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (Separate Document) AP
PENDICES (Separate Documents)
A C
alEEMod Emissions Summary
B Habitat Assessment and Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and MSHCP Consistency C Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview D Preliminary Soil Investigation
E Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
F Preliminary Hydrology Report
G Preliminary Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan H Noise Impact Analysis
I Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 1 City of Moreno Valley

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND)

FOR CACTUS & BRADSHAW

RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
(TTM 37858)
MIT

IGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Name: Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Findings: It is hereby determined that, based on the information contained in the attached Initial Study, the project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment.

Mitigation measures necessary to avoid the potentially significant effects on the environment are included in the attached Initial Study, which is hereby incorporated and fully made part of this Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City of Moreno Valley has hereby agreed to implement each of the identified mitigation measures, which would be adopted as part of the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

1. Project Case Number(s): PEN20-0172 (Tentative Tract Map), PEN20-0174 (General Plan Amendment), PEN-0175 (Change of Zone), PEN20-0173 (Conditional Use Permit)

2. Project
Title: Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858)

3. Public Comment Period: October 13, 2022, through November 2, 2022

4. Lead Agency: City of Moreno Valley
Mindy Davis, Planning Department
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, California 92552
(951) 413-3209
[email protected]

5. Documents Posted At: http://www.moval.org/cdd/documents/about-projects.html

6. Prepared By: Konnie Dobreva, JD
Meaghan Truman
EPD Solutions, Inc.
2 355 Main Street, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92614
(949)
794-1180

7. Proj
ect Sponsor:

Applicant/Developer
RC Hobbs Company
1428 Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866

WHERE OR EAMS SOA R
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 2 City of Moreno Valley

8. Pr
oject Location: The project site is located on approximately 4.81 acres at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue in the eastern portion of the City of Moreno Valley (project site). The City of Moreno Valley (City) encompasses approximately 52 square miles of land within Riverside County and is bounded by the City of Riverside to the east; the City of Perris and Lake Perris State Recreation Area to the south; the B adlands mountain range and City of Beaumont to the east; and the Box Springs Mountains range and the City of Redlands (within San Bernardino County) to the north. See Figure 1, Regional Location.

Regional access to the project site is provided by State Route 60 (SR -60) and Interstate 215 (I-215). Local access to the project site is provided by Moreno Brach Drive and Cactus Avenue. The project site is located within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Sunnymead 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle.

9. General Plan Designation: Residential (5 du/ac)
Residential 5: The primary purpose of areas designated Residential 5 is to provide for single-family detached housing on standard sized suburban lots at a density of 5 dwelling units per acre.

10. Specific Plan Name and Designation: N/A

11. Existing Zoning: Residential 5 District (R5)
Residential 5 District: The primary purpose of the R5 district is to provide for residential development on common sized suburban lots. This district is intended as an area for development of single-family residential and mobile home subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of 5 dwelling units per acre, as indicated in Section 9.03.020 of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code (MVMC).

12. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Project
Site Vacant Residential: 5 max
du/ac (R5) Residential 5 (R5) District
North Single-Family Residential Residential: Max. 5
du/ac (R5)
Residential 5 (R5) District
South Single-Family Residential Residential: Max. 10
du/ac (R10)
Suburban Residential (SP 193
ML)
East Vacant/Undeveloped
Commercial (C)
Residential/Office
(R/O)
Residential Single-Family 10
(RS10) District
West Vacant/Undeveloped,
Single-family Residential
Residential: Max. 10
du/ac (R10)
Commercial (CC)
Residential 15 District (R15)

13. Descr
iption of the Site and Project:

Environmental Setting
Existing Project Site
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 3 City of Moreno Valley The approximately 4.81- acre project site consists of three parcels (APNs 478- 090-018, 478-090-024, and 478- 090-025) and is comprised of vacant and graded lots. Vehicular access to the site is provided by Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue as shown on Figure 2, Local Vicinity, and Figure 3, Aerial. The perimeter of the site is partially secured by a chain-link fence along the perimeter of the site.

Existing vegetation at the project site consists of a dense cover of grasses as well as one Palo Verde and one Palm Tree. The topography of the project site is relatively flat with a gentle slope of less than one percent across the site.

Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations
As shown on Figure 4, General Plan Designation, the project site currently has a General Plan land use designation of Residential: Max. 5 du/ac (R5). The primary purpose of areas designated Residential 5 is to provide for single- family detached housing on standard sized suburban lots. The maximum allowable density is 5 dwelling units per acre.

As shown on Figure 5, Zoning Map, the project site is currently zoned Residential 5 District (R5) . The primary purpose of the R5 district is to provide for residential development on common sized suburban lots. This district is intended as an area for development of single -family residential and mobile home subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of five dwelling units per net acre, as indicated in MVMC Section

9.03.020.

Project Description
Introduction
The proposed project would develop 37 single-family residential lots, onsite roadw ays with sidewalks, drainage infrastructure, and open space lots on the 4.81-acre project site (project). Figure 6, Conceptual Site Plan, illustrates the proposed site configuration following project implementation, and Figure 7, Wall and Fence Plan, shows the proposed walls and fencing for the project.

As the project proposes a residential density of 7. 9 dwelling units per acre, the project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the site’s land use designation from Residential: Max. 5 du/ac (R5) to Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) and a Change of Zone from Residential 5 District (R5) to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District . The project also requires approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37858) and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD).

Project Characteristics
The proj
ect proposes a total residential lot area of 136,045 SF. The single- family residences would range in size from 1,864 SF to 2,526 SF with a minimum lot size of 3,095 SF. The project proposes three distinct three- to four-bedroom floor plans, private yards, and two-car garages for the residential lots. In addition to the residential lots, t he project proposes lots designated for open space and drainage purposes. Two bioretention drainage basins (Lot A and Lot B) are located along the western portion of the project site and a linear 3-foot-wide drainage ditch (Lot C) is located along the eastern property line.

An approximately 10,982 SF recreation – open space lot (Lot D) is located near the center of the residential development, which would include landscaping, walkways, and seating F.1.d
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 4 City of Moreno Valley areas. New walkways are also proposed throughout the residential development. The project would provide private yards within the single- family residential lots. The project would include a total of 15,961 SF of open space.

Architectural Design
The propo
sed single- family residences would be designed with Spanish, French, and Cottage architectural elements, multi-level rooflines, and an earth tone color scheme. In addition, the residences would incorporate stucco finishes, detailed roof elements, awnings, metal railings, and decorative windows and doors in the exterior design.

Enhanced elevations would be incorporated where building sides or rears are visible from streets. The tallest roofline of the two- story residences would be less than 30 feet in height.

The proposed two-story single-family residences would include three different floor plans and two different architectural styles to provide aesthetic variation throughout the community. Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3 homes would include a traditional two-story home design with either Spanish or French architectural elements.

Access and Circulation
Vehi
cular access to the project site would be provided via two driveways on Bradshaw Circle, which would provide access to the community’s internal roadways . The single- family residences would be accessed by private driveways along the internal roadways, as shown on Figure 6, Conceptual Site Plan. The project also includes pedestrian paths to provide for non- vehicular onsite circulation and for connection to existing sidewalks and bike lanes adjacent to the proposed project.

The proposed project would provide garage, driveway, and on-street parking. Each residence would have a two or three car garage depending on floor plan and a minimum of two driveway parking spaces.

Landscaping
Landsc
aping proposed as part of the project would consist of drought-tolerant ornamental trees, shrubbery, and groundcover. Turf would be provided in active use areas in common open spaces. The landscape plan would be consistent with the City’s landscape and irrigation design standards, as provided in MVMC Section 9.17.030. Figure 8, Landscape Plan, illustrates the proposed landscaping for the project.

Lighting
Out
door lighting included as part of future development on the project site would be typical of single-family residential PUDs and would consist of wall -mounted lighting as well as pole-mounted lights along the proposed internal roadways. Nighttime lighting would be used as accent/security lighting in the park area. The project’s outdoor lighting would be directed downward and shielded to minimize off -site spill. The location of all exterior lighting would comply with lighting standards established in the MVMC.

Infrastructure Improvements
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 5 City of Moreno Valley Water and Sewer
The proposed project would install a new 8-inch diameter sewer line and 8-inch diameter water line within the project’s proposed onsite private streets and within Bradshaw Circle where these new lines would connect to an existing 21-inch diameter sewer line and 12- inch diameter water line, respectively, within Cactus Avenue.

Drainage
In the existing condition, the topography of the project site is relatively flat with a small elevation change towards Bradshaw Circle. T he project site’s current surface runoff generally sheet flows to the southwest. In the developed condition, onsite flows would be conveyed to one of two onsite water quality bioretention basins (Lots A and B), and both of these basin lots would connect to a new 24-inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle that would connect to the existing Storm Drain Line F-4 within Cactus Avenue that is operated by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC).

Parcel Consolidation
The proj
ect would consolidate the three existing parcels ( APNs 478-090-018, 478-090- 024, and 478- 090-025) into one Tentative Tract Map. Existing parcels in the project vicinity would not be impacted by the proposed parcel consolidation.

GENERA

L PLAN AND ZONING
As
discussed, the project requires a General Plan Amendment to change the designation of the site to Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) and Change of Zone to Residential Single- Family 10 (RS10) District in order to implement the project, which proposes single-family residential uses at a density of 7.9 dwelling units per acre. MVMC Section 9.03.020 states that the primary purpose of the Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District is to provide for residential development on small single-family lots with amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions. The district is intended for subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of ten (10) dwelling units per net acre.

Following approval of the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone, the project would be consistent with the land use designation and zoning classification associated with the project site.

As a result of project implementation, all other off -site land use designations and zoning classifications in the project vicinity would remain the same as under existing conditions.

CONST

RUCTION DURATION AND ZONING
Cons
truction activities include demolition of the existing structures, pavement , and the existing utility infrastructure; grubbing, grading, excavation and re- compaction of soils; utility and infrastructure installation; building construction; roadway pavement; and architectural coatings. Approximately 8,097 cubic yards of soil is proposed to be exported during grading activities.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 6 City of Moreno Valley Construction activities for the project would occur over 12 months and would begin in 2023 with the opening for project occupancy in 2024. Construction activities would occur in the following stages: site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and paving. Pursuant to the MVMC Chapter 8.14.040, construction activities would be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday, unless written approval is obtained from the City building official or City engineer.

DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS
In ac
cordance with Sections 15050 and 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City is the designated Lead Agency for the proposed project and has principal authority and jurisdiction for CEQA actions and project approval. Responsible Agencies are those agencies that have jurisdiction or authority over one or more aspects associated with the development of a proposed project and/or mitigation. Trustee Agencies are State agencies that have jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a proposed project.

The following discretionary approvals by the City, as Lead Agency, are anticipated to be necessary for implementation of the proposed project:

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
• General Plan Amendment to change the site’s land use designation from Residential: Max. 5 du/ac (R5) to Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) • Change of Zone from Residential 5 District (R5) to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District
• Approval of Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37858)
• Approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 7 City of Moreno Valley This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858)
Regional Location
Figure 1
J h;J ro ve
Colt on
n-"'<;
G ra rd T e r ra ce
rand
_:~~:___ --
B O )<
0 S PR INGS
MEAD
VALLEY
Ge ne r-a l
o ld Go lf
Co u rse

1.25 2.5
Me n ne
.,
,,,
-~~~oj_ ~S~!,.B~m~l'j~. • •• ,
Count l 'of=-Ri"Ve'rs ide2 C 1.
o,..c> a ,mesa
0~
., er
N-:.rtot
Youngl
Re e
Morer:io Velley G, ----------- 111
r,l o reno va ll ey
Ma rc h A ir
R eserve
Base
PE
5 Miles
=
Perris
LEY
Project Site
•
Sacramento
0 San
·r,:rn cisco 0
CALIF OR Nl4
0 Fres no
I

G R E A T
B A S ( ~
NE,'\IADA
L - Ve gas
0 Los An geles
0 •
N
A
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 9 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 2 Local VicinityLocal Vicinity
Project Site
....
0 .:: u
" " co
0 C:
~
0 ::!:
..
0 ,t:;
u
"' " co
0 C:
~
0 ::!:

CJ
Cl)
,,
~
....
::,
:;;
Brod laea Ave
a
" .. ,, ..

C
C:
c(
Bradshaw Cir
Cactus Ave
,, ..

C
3 ..
~
"e Belleterre i,;
a
" ,,
·.;
Cl
C
·c
0 :;;
Arborglenn Dr
Brodi a ea
Cactus Ave
l•,1,,reno Va ll.-y
Ranch ) if Club
GraodvieW ti
City of Moreno Valley, City of Riverside, County of Riverside, San Bernardino County, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin , INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS
N
A
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 11 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 3 Aerial View
Project Site
CJ
N
A
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 13 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 4 General Plan Designation
RS
p
R3 I
R3
o □□ R3 DO
R/0
R3 R3 c::;::=
R/0
R/0
RS RS
c::J Residenti a l: M ax . 1 d u/ac
Mixed Use
- Residential: M ax. 5 or 15 du/ac - Planned Residential - Residential: Max. 10 du/ac
c::J Residential: Max. 2 du/ac - Residential: Max .15 du/ac c::J Rural R es ident ia l: M ax 2. 5 du/ac - Resid enti a l: Max . 20 du/ac - R es ide nti a l: Max. 3 du/ac - Residential: M ax . 30 du/ac - R es ide nti al: Max. 5 du/ac - Hillside Res identi a l r=i Residential /Office
- Office
- Commercia l
- Business Park/Light Industrial
- Open Space
- Public Fac iliti es
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 15 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 5 Zoning Designation
Brradsliiaw·fi r;cle~ --
Residential 5 District
D
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Residential 3 District
Residential Single Family 10 District - Open Space
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 17 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 6 Conceputal Site Plan
~ Area
ARCEL 4
'M 8114
18 38
HAEL W
~cr
x/5
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 19 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 7 Wall and Fence Plan
Wall Plan Key
5’ High Tan Vinyl Fence
6’ High Mansonry Block Walls
5’ High Tan Vinyl Gate
Power Coated Wrought Fencing with Iron Gate
Combo Retaining/ block wall
WQMP Basin Walls
{]bscCK"'ed Area
C
v-
Oi1111t£R: CI.J:U.SCTH
JS,IJ, (TM...

APN 4 7,9-0i0-021!1
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 21 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project (TTM 37858) Figure 8 Landscape Plan
Area
ARCE L 4
:,M 8114
!-~---~-§/.,2 8
'\;
"' ill
, ________ ,'--,.,! p
p ~~~~--
p · ■ taclac»Tn • n • f ■
Pyrn s c<> ll ■ ~<>n<> 'Arl ■ t occ<> t ' Arl s toc , o ! rlow ■ ,Tng P ■ <> ' C • •e l ■ occld ■ ntall •
L<lg ■ , ■ t,o ■ =lclndTca
01 ■ <> ■ ucop<> ■ O 'Fcu'tl ■ u '
Chincnanth., • r •l"•u•
Geij eraparviflcra
1 5 gal
1!>gol
1 5 g<>I
1 5 g<>I
15 g al
15ga l
• lmjl Ceono l hus •P~
9<>c<ho , · ■ p"lulo , · ■
Slsy,lnehl u .,.,b ■ llun'I
l.lu h l ■ nb ■ , g ·od g ■ n •
Coll fo,nlo Llloe
Owo,fCoyot ■ 9uo h
81u ■ - t, e dG ,o u
o .. ,c, ....

Coll fo, n lo WIid Ro s ■
. , ..,_ , , 1.00tsO ~GII-OIM)CO',rfA
5gol
1gol
1 g ol
1 g el l r, ·r.i.,,
5i;tol
OWNER; EUZABE
T'SAJ, ET AL.

APN -47B-090-0
Tlpu
Cl,k ~•
lto'"' oSyoomo, o
c.._, ...,,,....,
O•ort Corot•
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 23 City of Moreno Valley

This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 24 City of Moreno Valley

14.Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.

The City sent notices regarding the project to the following California Native American tribes that may have knowledge regarding tribal cultural resources in the project vicinity:
• Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
• Cahuilla Band of Indians
• Desert Cahuilla Indians
• Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla Indians
• Morongo Band of Mission Indians
• Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians
• Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians
• San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
• Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
• Serrano Nation of Mission Indians
• Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians

The Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians requested consultation regarding the proposed project. The consulting tribes consider the area sensitive for cultural resources as several sites are located nearby. Although no information for site specific tribal cultural resources was provided (and there are no known tribal cultural resources on or adjacent to the project site), the consulting tribes requested inclusion of mitigation due to the potential of the Project to unear th previously undocumented tribal cultural resources during construction. These mitigation measures are incorporated in this Initial Study.

15. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):

None applicable

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 25 City of Moreno Valley

16. Other Technical Studies Referenced in this Initial Study (Provided as Appendices):

A. CalEEMod Emissions Summary
B. Habitat Assessment and Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys and MSHCP Consistency C. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview D. Preliminary Soil Investigation
E. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
F. Preliminary Hydrology Report
G. Preliminary Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan H. Noise Impact Analysis
I. Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis

17. Acronyms:

ADA - American with Disabilities Act
ALUC - Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP - Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
AQMP - Air Quality Management Plan
CEQA - California Environmental Quality Act
CIWMD - California Integrated Waste Management District CMP - Congestion Management Plan
DTSC - Department of Toxic Substance Control
DWR - Department of Water Resources
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
EMWD - Eastern Municipal Water District
EOP - Emergency Operations Plan
FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency
FMMP - Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
GIS - Geographic Information System
GHG - Greenhouse Gas
GP - General Plan
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HOA - Homeowners Association
IS - Initial Study
LHMP - Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LOS - Level of Service
LST - Localized Significance Threshold
MARB - March Air Reserve Base
MARB/IPA- March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport
MSHCP - Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
MVFP - Moreno Valley Fire Department
MVPD - Moreno Valley Police Department
MVUSD - Moreno Valley Unified School District
MWD - Metropolitan Water District
NCCP - Natural Communities Conservation Plan
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OEM - Office of Emergency Services
OPR - Office of Planning & Research, State
PEIR - Program Environmental Impact Report
PW - Public Works
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 26 City of Moreno Valley

RCEH - Riverside County Environmental Health
RCFCWCD - Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District RCP - Regional Comprehensive Plan
RCTC - Riverside County Transportation Commission
RCWMD - Riverside County Waste Management District
RTA - Riverside Transit Agency
RTIP - Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP - Regional Transportation Plan
SAWPA - Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
SCAG - Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE - Southern California Edison
SCH - State Clearinghouse
SKRHCP - Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan SWPPP - Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB - State Water Resources Control Board
USFWS - United States Fish and Wildlife
USGS - United States Geologic Survey
VMT - Vehicle Miles Traveled
VVUSD - Valley Verde Unified School District
WQMP - Water Quality Management Plan
WRCOG - Western Riverside Council of Government

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) F.1.d
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 28 City of Moreno Valley

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).

A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-sit e as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross- referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or another CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).

In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 29 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code §21099 – Modernization of Transportation Analysis for Transit-Oriented Infill Projects – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Response:

No Impact. Scenic vistas consist of expansive, panoramic views of important, unique, or highly valued visual features that are seen from public viewing areas. This definition combines visual quality with information about view exposure to describe the level of interest or concern that viewers may have for the quality of a particular view or visual setting. A scenic vista can be impacted in 2 ways: a development project can have visual impacts by either directly diminishing the scenic quality of the vista or by blocking the view corridors or “vista” of the scenic resource. Important factors in determining whether the proposed project would block scenic vistas include the project’s proposed height, mass, and location relative to surrounding land uses and travel corridors.

The project site is located within a partially developed area of the City and is not within or adjacent to a scenic vista. The site is adjacent to roadways and existing residential land uses. The Moreno Valley General Plan Figure 7-2, Major Scenic Resources identifies the scenic resources within the City that include: Box Springs Mountains, Moreno Peak, Russell Mountains, Reche Mountains, and the Badlands.

The site is located approximately one mile south of the Moreno Peak. However, only partial views of the Moreno Peak are present on the project site between the existing single- family residences to the north. The proposed single- family residences would be 30 feet in height and would be the same height as existing single-family residences to the north and south.

In addition, Figure 7 -2, Major Scenic Resources of the General Plan designates various view corridors throughout the City. The proposed project is not within or adjacent to a designated view corridor. Thus, redevelopment of the project site with single-family residences would not obstruct, interrupt, or diminish a scenic vista; and impacts would not occur.

b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?

Response:

No Impact. There are no designated state scenic highways in the City. The closest eligible state scenic highway is State Route (SR) 74, which travels east/west and is approximately 11.5 miles to the south of the project site. The closest officially designated state scenic highway is SR 243 from Interstate 10 (I-10) south of the city of Banning limits (Caltrans 2021), which is located approximately 17 miles east of the project site. Neither of the scenic highways discussed above are visible from the project site, therefore, no impacts to state scenic highways would occur from implementation of the proposed project.

c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?

Less than Significant Impact. As described previously, the project site is located in a developing portion of Moreno Valley and is adjacent to roadways to the south and west, vacant land to the east, and single- family residences north.

Nearby parcels are developed with single-family residential uses. The project site is vacant. The existing character of the site and surrounding area is neither unique nor of special aesthetic value or quality.

The project would redevelop the project to provide 37 new single-family residences, which would be similar to the single- family residential uses that are adjacent to the west of the site, to the south of the site beyond the flood control channel, and to the north of the site beyond Finch Avenue.

□ □ □ ~
□ □ □ ~
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 30 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Zoning. The project site is currently zoned as Residential 5 District (R5). The project includes a zone change to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District to implement the proposed single- family residential uses. MVMC Section

9.03.020 states that the primary purpose of the Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District is to provide for residential development on small single- family lots with amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions. The district is intended for subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of ten (10) dwelling units per net acre.

The proposed development would also require approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows for a development to establish unique criteria for such things as setbacks, lot width and depth, building separation, and lot size. This is allowed in exchange for a higher level of detail and amenities within the project than typically required for standard residential development. The project would be consistent with the standards for approval of a PUD listed in MVMC Section 9.03.060.

As detailed in Table AES-1, the proposed project would be consistent with the development standards for the Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District listed in Municipal Code Section 9.03.040 with approval of a PUD. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with applicable zoning regulations governing scenic quality.

Table AES-1: Project Consistency with Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District Development Standards
Standard Municipal Code Requirement Proposed Project
Minimum lot size 4,500 acre 3,095 SF*
Lot width 45 ft. 43 ft.*
Lot depth 85 ft. 72 ft.*
Maximum density 10 du/acre 7.9 du/acre
Height limit 30 feet 30 feet/2 stories
* consistent with approval of a PUD

General Plan. The project site currently has a General Plan land use designation of Residential: Max. 5 du/ac (R5). The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the designation of the site to Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10). According to the General Plan Land Use Element, the Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) General Plan land use designation allows for development of residential uses to a maximum density of 10 dwelling units per acre. The project’s proposed density of approximately 7.9 du/ac would be consistent with the maximum allowable density of 10 du/ac with the approval of a PUD. In addition, the project would be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element goals and policies related to scenic quality, as shown in Table AES-2.

Table AES-2: Consistency with Land Use Element Goals and Policies Related to Scenic Quality Goal or Policy Project Consistency
Goal 2.1: A pattern of land uses, which organizes
future growth, minimizes conflicts between land
uses, and which promotes the rational utilization of
presently underdeveloped and undeveloped
parcels.

Consistent. The proposed project would
redevelop the vacant site with 37 new single-family
residences on an existing vacant site in the City,
which would promote the rational utilization of a
presently undeveloped parcel. Therefore, the
project would be consistent with Goal 2.1.

Goal 2.4: A supply of housing in sufficient numbers
suitable to meet the diverse needs of future
residents and to support healthy economic
development without creating an oversupply of any
particular type of housing.

Consistent. The proposed project would
redevelop the vacant site with 37 new single-family
residences, which would assist in meeting the
diverse needs of future residents. In addition, the
project would provide 3 different plans and
architectural styles for the single-family residences,
which would support healthy economic
development and an oversupply of a particular type
of housing would not occur. Therefore, the project
would be consistent with Goal 2.4.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 31 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Policy 2.2.8: The primary purpose of areas
designated Residential 10 is to provide for a variety
of residential products and to encourage innovation
in housing types. Developments within Residential
10 areas are typically expected to provide
amenities not generally found in suburban
subdivisions, such as common open space and
recreational areas. The maximum allowable
density shall be 10.0 dwelling units per acre.

Consistent. The proposed project would
redevelop the project site with single- family
residences at a density of 7. 9 dwelling unit per
acre, which would be consistent with the maximum
allowable density of 10 dwelling units per acre.

Therefore, the project would be consistent with
Policy 2.2.8.

Policy 2.2.12: Planned Unit Developments (PUD)
shall be encouraged for residential construction in
order to provide housing that is varied by type,
design, form of ownership, and size. PUD’s shall
also provide opportunities to cluster units to protect
significant environmental features and/or provide
unique recreational facilities.

Consistent. As described in the Project
Description, the proposed project would provide 3
different plans and 3 different architectural styles
for the single-family residences to provide housing
that is varied by type, design, and size. In addition,
the project would provide sidewalks and
landscaping along the streets and within common
areas. Therefore, the project would be consistent
with Policy 2.2.12.

Policy 2.2.14: Encourage a diversity of housing
types, including conventional, factory built, mobile
home, and multiple family dwelling units.

Consistent. As described in the previous
response, the proposed project would provide 3
different plans and 3 different architectural styles
for the single-
family residences to provide a
diversity of housing types. Therefore, the project
would be consistent with Policy 2.2.14.

Policy 2.3.1: Within individual resi dential projects,
a variety of floor plans and elevations should be
offered.

Consistent. As described in the previous
response, the proposed project would provide 3
different plans and 3 different architectural styles
for the single- family residences. Ther efore, the
project would be consistent with Policy 2.3.1.

Policy 2.3.2: Encourage building placement
variations, roofline variations, architectural
projections, and other embellishments to enhance
the visual interest along residential streets.

Consistent. The proposed residential
development would be designed with
contemporary architectural elements, multi -level
rooflines, and a complementary color scheme.

Architectural elements in the exterior design would
include stucco finish, stone veneer accents, metal
awnings and deck railings, and vinyl window and
door trim. The project would be designed with
Spanish, French, and Cottage style architectural
elements. When complete, the development would
be representative of a modern residential
community. In addition, landscaping improvements
associated with the proposed project are
anticipated to improve the existing visual character
of the project site and would serve to provide
increased visual interest along residential streets.

Therefore, the project would be con sistent with
Policy 2.3.2.

Policy 2.3.3: Discourage the development of
single-family residences with a bulk (building
mass) that is out of scale with the size of the
parcels on which they are located.

Consistent. The proposed project would construct
the proposed single- family residences with 3
different plans designed to conform to the size of
the parcel on which they are located. Therefore,
the project would be consistent with Policy 2.3.3.

Policy 2.3.4: Design large -scale small lot single
family and multiple family residential projects to
Consistent. The proposed project would construct
the proposed single-family residences with private
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 32 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
group dwellings around individual open space
and/or recreational features.
open space, as well as a total of 26,401 SF of open
space and/or recreational features. The single -
family residences would be grouped around a
11,443 SF community recreation area. Therefore,
the project would be consistent with Policy 2.3.4.

Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with development standards required by the RS10 zoning district with the approval of a CUP for a PUD, the Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) General Plan land use designation, as well as the Land Use Element goals and policies related to scenic quality. Thus, the project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Furthermore, the project would increase the visual cohesion between the project site and the surrounding single -family residential area. Hence, the proposed project would not degrade the visual character of the project site and surrounding area; and impacts would be less than significant.

d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is undeveloped and has no existing source of nighttime lighting.

However, the project site is surrounded by sources of nighttime lighting including streetlights along Cactus Avenue, illumination from vehicle headlights, offsite exterior residential related lighting, and interior illumination passing through windows. Sensitive receptors relative to lighting and glare include residents, motorists, and pedestrians.

The proposed project would include the provision of street lighting and nighttime lighting for security purposes around all of the residences. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a higher intensity development on the project site than currently exists, which would contribute additional sources to the overall ambient nighttime lighting conditions.

However, all outdoor lighting would be hooded, appropriately angled away from adjacent land uses, and would comply with the MVMC Section 9.16.28
0 that will highlight building features and add emphasis to important spaces and entryways, while limiting glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties. Because the project site is within an urban area with various sources of existing nighttime lighting, and the project would be required to comply with the City’s lighting regulations that would be verified by the City’s Building and Safety Division during the permitting process, the lighting increase in light that would be generated by the project would not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

Overall, lighting impacts would be less than significant.

Reflective light (glare) can be caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces such as window glass or other reflective materials. Generally, darker or mirrored glass would have a higher visible light reflectance than clear glass. Buildings constructed of highly reflective materials from which the sun reflects at a low angle can cause adverse glare. The proposed project would not use highly reflective surfaces, or glass sided buildings. Although the residences would contain windows, the windows would be separated by stucco and architectural elements, which would limit the potential of glare. In addition, as described previously, onsite lighting would be angled down and shielded, which would avoid the potential on onsite lighting to generate glare. Therefore, the project would not generate substantial sources of glare, and impacts would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.3 – Community Design • Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.8 – Scenic Resources - Figure 6-2 – Major Scenic Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.11 – Aesthetics
- Figure 4.11-1 – Major Scenic Resources
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 33 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.110 – Light and Glare of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code. • Chapter 9.16 – Design Guidelines
• Section 9.17.030 G – Heritage Trees

4. California Department of Transportation, California Scenic Highway Mapping System. 2021. Accessed: at https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic- highways (Accessed February 22, 2021).

II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES – In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?

Response:

No Impact. The project site is identified by the California Department of Conservation Important Farmland Finder as “Farmland of Local Importance” (CDC 2020). The project site is not designated as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Thus, the proposed project would not result in impacts related to conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. No impact would occur. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
Response:

No Impact. The project site has an existing zoning designation of Residential 5 District (R5). The project site is not zoned for agricultural use and is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. Thus, the proposed project would not result in impacts related to conflict with an existing agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contract. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?

Response:

No Impact. No forest land exists on or adjacent to the project site. The project site has a zoning designation for residential and is not zoned for forest land or timberland uses. Thus, the proposed project would not result in impacts related to conflict with an existing forest land or timberland zoning. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Response:

No Impact. No forest land exists on the project site. Thus, the proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use, and impacts would not occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

Response:
□ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
-
□ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 34 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact. As described in the responses above, the project area does not include farmland or forest land; thus, implementation of the proposed project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Impacts would not occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measure
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.7 – Agricultural Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.8 – Agricultural Resources
- Figure 4.8-1 – Important Farmlands

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. California Department of Conservation, Important Farmland Finder. 2016. Available:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/ (Accessed February 22, 2021).

III. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementa tion of the applicable air quality plan?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for preparing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. The AQMP details goals, policies, and programs for improving air quality in the Basin. In preparation of the AQMP, SCAQMD and SCAG uses regional growth projections to forecast, inventory, and allocate regional emissions from land use and development-related sources.

As described in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993), for purposes of analyzing consistency with the AQMP, if a proposed project would result in growth that is substantially greater than what was anticipated, then the proposed project would conflict with the AQMP. On the other hand, if a project’s density is within the anticipated growth of a jurisdiction, its emissions would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQMP, and the project would not conflict with SCAQMD’s attainment plans. In addition, the SCAQMD considers projects consistent with the AQMP if the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation.

The proposed project is a residential development project on a currently vacant site. The site is located within a residential area of Moreno Valley. The proposed project would develop 37 single-family residences on the site. As further described in Section 14, Population and Housing, would result in the addition of approximately 143 new residents, which would represent a population increase of approximately 0.07 percent and a 0.06 percent increase in residential units within the City. This limited level of growth on a site that has been previously developed would not exceed growth projections and would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQMP.

In addition, emissions generated by construction and operation of the proposed project would not exceed thresholds. As described in the analysis below, the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with the AQMP from the proposed project would be less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?

□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 35 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAB is in a non- attainment status for federal ozone standards, federal carbon monoxide standards, and state and federal particulate matter standards. Any development in the SCAB, including the proposed project, could cumulatively contribute to these pollutant violations. The methodologies from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are used in evaluating project impacts. SCAQMD has established daily mass thresholds for regional pollutant emissions, which are shown in Table AQ -1. Should construction or operation of the proposed project exceed these thresholds a significant impact could occur; however, if estimated emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant.

Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds
Pollutant Construction
(lbs/day)
Operations
(lbs/day)
NOx 100 55
VOC 75 55
PM-10 150 150
PM-2.5 55 55
SOx 150 150
CO 550 550
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

Construction
Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate pollutant emissions from the following: (1) demolition and removal of the existing onsite improvements and recycling debris; (2) grading and excavation; (3) construction workers traveling to and from project site; (4) delivery and hauling of construction supplies to, and debris from, the project site; (5) fuel combustion by onsite construction equipment; (6) building construction; application of architectural coatings; and paving. The amount of emissions generated on a daily basis would vary, depending on the intensity and types of construction activities occurring.

It is mandatory for all construction projects to comply with several SCAQMD Rules, including Rule 403 for controlling fugitive dust, PM-10, and PM-2.5 emissions from construction activities. Rule 403 requirements include, but are not limited to: applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site, covering all trucks hauling soil with a fabric cover and maintaining a freeboard height of 12-inches, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Compliance with Rule 403 was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling for the project. In addition, implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 that governs the VOC content in architectural coating, paint, thinners, and solvents, was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling for the project. As shown in Table AQ -2, CalEEMod results indicate that construction emissions generated by the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. 1,2 Therefore,
emissions from construction activities would be less than significant.

1 It should be noted the air quality analysis analyzed 38 dwelling units based on an earlier iteration of the project’s site plan. As the project proposes 37 dwelling units, the project-generated emissions calculated in the air quality analysis are therefore highly conservative. 2 It should be noted that the air quality analysis was modeled using CalEEMod Version 2020.4 (V2020.4). The latest version of CalEEMod, V2022.1, was run for the project using 11th Edition Trip rates and found that impacts from construction & operation would continue to be less than significant utilizing the latest CalEEMod version.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 36 City of Moreno Valley

Table AQ-2: Construction Emissions Summary
Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions(1)
(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM-10 PM-2.5
2021
Site Preparation
Grading
Building Construction
Maximum Daily Emission

5.4 4.1

2.2 5.4

60.8 67.5

18.9 67.5

22.6 20.6

18.4 22.6

0.1 0.1

0.0 0.1

7.5 5.8

1.6 7.5

5.1 3.2

1.0 5.1
2022
Paving
Architectural Coating
Maximum Daily Emission

1.3 49.1

49.1 9.5

1.4 9.5

12.9 2.1

12.9 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.7 0.2

0.7 0.6

0.1 0.8
2021 to 2022
Maximum Daily
Emissions

49.1 67.5 22.6 0.1 7.5 5.1
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds
75 100 550 150 150 55
Emissions Exceed
Thresholds?
No No No No No No
Notes:

ROG = reactive organic gases NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM-10 = particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter CO = carbon monoxide SOx = sulfur oxides PM emissions reflect SCAQMD Rule 403 reductions
Source: see CalEEMod model output
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

Operation
Operation of the 37 single-family residences would result in long -term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with area sources, such as natural gas consumption, landscaping, applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products . However, vehicular emissions would generate a majority of the operational emissions from the project.

Operational emissions associated with the proposed project were modeled using CalEEMod and are presented in Table AQ-3. As shown, the proposed project would result in long- term regional emissions of the criteria pollutants that would be below the SCAQMD’s applicable thresholds. Therefore, operation of the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant impacts, and operational impacts would be less than significant.

Table AQ-3: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions
Operational Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO PM-10 PM-2.5
Area 3.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0
Energy 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
Mobile 0.7 5.4 8.9 2.9 0.8
Total Project Operational
Emissions

3.9 5.7 12.3 2.9 0.8
SCAQMD Significance
Threshold
55 55 550 150 55
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 37 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Exceed Threshold? No No No No No
Notes:

NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM-10 = particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter ROG = reactive organic gases
PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter CO = carbon monoxide Source: see CalEEMod model output
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008) recommends the evaluation of localized NO2, CO, PM-10, and PM-2.5 construction-related impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis. According to the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology , “off-site mobile emissions from the project should not be included in the emissions compared to the LSTs” (SCAQMD 2008). SCAQMD has
developed LSTs that represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards, and thus would not c ause or contribute to localized air quality impacts. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of NOx, CO, PM - 10, and PM-2.5 pollutants for each of the 38 source receptor areas (SRAs) in the SCAB. The project site is located within SRA 24, Perris Valley. The LSTs for this SRA were applied to the project.

Sensitive receptors can include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities. The nearest sensitive receptors are existing residences are located adjacent to the project site. The distance between the project site boundary and the closest existing residential structure is located north of the project site boundary approximately 10-feet from the property line. Therefore, the distance for sensitive receptors in the LST assessment was set at 25 meters, the shortest distance contained in the SCAQMD LST emission look-up tables (AQ 2020).

Construction

The localized thresholds from the mass rate look- up tables in SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document, were developed for use on projects that are less than or equal to 5- acres in size or have a disturbance of less than or equal to 5 acres daily. The project site is approximately 4.81 acres. Therefore, the use of the LSTs for a 5-acre project were used in the Air Quality Assessment (AQ 2020).

Table AQ-4 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the project. As shown, project construction-source emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions of any criteria pollutant.

Thus, implementation of the project would not result in a localized air quality impact.

Table AQ-4: Localized Significance Summary of Construction Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Localized Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM-10 PM-2.5
2021
Site Preparation
Grading
Building Construction
Maximum Daily Emission

60.8 40.0

17.4 60.8

21.9 16.4

16.6 21.9

7.3 3.3

1.0 7.3

5.0 2.4

0.9 5.0
2022
Paving
Architectural Coating
Maximum Daily Emission

9.5 1.4

9.5 12.2

1.4 12.2

0.5 0.1

0.5 0.5

0.1 0.5

I I I I
□ □ ~ □
I
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 38 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
2021 to 2022
Maximum Daily Emissions 60.8 21.9 7.3 5.0
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds
224 1,250 10 6
Emissions Exceed Thresholds? No No No No
Notes:

NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM-10 = particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter CO = carbon monoxide PM emissions reflect SCAQMD Rule 403 emission reductions Source: see CalEEMod model output
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

As described in Response 4.3(b), the proposed project would not significantly increase long -term emissions within the project area. Construction of the proposed project may expose nearby residential sensitive receptors to airborne particulates as well as a small quantity of construction equipment pollutants (i.e., usually diesel -fueled vehicles and equipment). However, construction contractors would be required to implement measures to reduce or eliminate emissions by following SCAQMD’s standard construction practices (Rules 402 and 403, as included as PPP AQ -1 and PPP AQ-2). Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source.

Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during construc tion, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
For operational LSTs, onsite passenger car and truck travel emissions were modeled. The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state Ambient Air Quality Standards. As shown on Table AQ -5, operational emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s localized significance thresholds for any criteria pollutant at the nearest sensitive recep tor. Therefore, localized air quality impacts from operational activities would be less than significant.

Table AQ-5: Localized Significance Summary of Operations Operational Activity
Maximum Daily Localized Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM-10 PM-2.5
Area 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0
Energy 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
Mobile 3.2 1.5 0.1 0.0
Total Project Operational Emissions 3.6 5.0 0.1 0.1
SCAQMD Significance Threshold 270 1,577 4 2
Exceed Threshold? No No No No
Notes:

NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM-10 = particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter CO = carbon monoxide Source: see CalEEMod model output
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Response: □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 39 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact. The proposed project would not emit other emissions, such as those generating objectionable odors, that would affect a substantial number of people. The threshold for odor is identified by SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states:

A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.

The type of facilities that are considered to result in other emissions, such as objectionable odors, include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer station s, fiberglass manufacturing facilities,
paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants , chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities.

The proposed project would implement residential development within the project area that does not involve the types of uses that would emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In addition, odors generated by non- residential land uses are required to be in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402, which would prevent nuisance odors.

During construction, emissions from construction equipment, architectural coatings, and paving activities may generate odors. However, these odors would be temporary, intermittent in nature, and would not affect a substantial number of people. The noxious odors would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. Also, the short - term construction-related odors would cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor -producing materials. Therefore, impacts associated with other emissions, such as odors, would not adversely affect a substantial number of people and impacts would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies

PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions.
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid- morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.

PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used.

Mitigation Measure
None.

Sources:

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 40 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 5 – Circulation Element
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.6 – Air Quality

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.3 – Air Quality
- Figure 4.3-1 – South Coast Air Basin
• Appendix C – Air Quality Analysis, P&D Consultants, July 2003

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.050 – Air Quality of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.150 – Odors of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.170 – Vibration of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 12.50.040 – Limitations on Engine Idling

5. Summary of CalEEMod Model Runs and Output for the Moreno Valley Residential Project. March 24, 2020.

Prepared by Vince Mirabella (Appendix A).

6. South Coast Air Quality Management District Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008). Accessed: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance- thresholds/final-lst-methodology-document.pdf (Accessed May 26, 2021).

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is vacant and undeveloped and has been previously disturbed. A Biological Habitat Assessment was prepared for the proposed project, which included a literature search to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. General plant and wildlife surveys were also conducted to identify any biological resources on or adjacent to the project site. The project site is within the Western Riverside County MSHCP (Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan) Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan.

The Habitat Assessment identified 8 special -status plant s pecies that to have the potential to occur within the project vicinity; however, only the Woven-Spored Lichen (Texosporium sancti-jacobi) was determined to have a low potential for occurrence and was not observed during surveys. The remaining seven special-status plant species were determined to have no potential and be absent from the project site (Gonzalez 2020).

The Habitat Assessment identified 30 special-status wildlife species that to have the potential to occur within the project vicinity, one speci es (Stephens’ kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys stephensi)) was assumed to be present. However, wildlife species that are covered and adequately conserved by the MSHCP do not include Stephens’ Kangaroo rat. Stephens’ Kangaroo rat (SKR) is covered under the SKR Habitat Conservation Plan. As a covered species, participation in the SKR Habitat Conservation Plan would provide “take” for SKR species and no additional mitigation except payment of an SKR fee, included as Mitigation Measure BIO-1, would be required (Gonzalez 2020).

It was determined that potentially suitable habitat for burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) is present onsite. The burrowing owl is a state species of special concern and MSHCP Group 3 species that is commonly found in open, dry grasslands, agricultural and range lands, as well as desert habitats with low-growing vegetation. The burrowing owl resides in burrows primarily created, then abandoned, by species such as California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Therefore, protocol burrowing owl surveys were conducted to determine the presence and use of the site by burrowing owls.

□ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 41 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Burrowing owl habitat assessment surveys and focused surveys were conducted in 2020 according to the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions fo r the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area . The surveys were completed in three steps; Habitat Assessment (Step 1), Focused Burrow Surveys (Step 2A), and Focused Owl Surveys (Step 2B).

In Step 1, habitat within the project area was assessed for burrowing owl presence, use, and potential use. Areas with potential burrowing owl habitat, including pasture and debris piles were surveyed by Gonzales Environmental Consulting, LLC for potential burrows. Biologists walked areas of potential habitat while searching for the presence of burrowing owls, potential and active burrows, and owl sign, such as feathers, pellets, and prey items. The survey area included a 150- meter (500-foot) buffer zone outside of the project site. Step 1 of the survey identified suitable burrowing owl habitat on- site due to the presence of low-growing vegetation.

In Step 2A, focused burrow surveys were conducted, which included surveys of natural burrows or suitable debris piles.

Transect surveys for burrows, including owl signs, were conducted by walking or being escorted through suitable habitat over the entire survey area. The locations of all potential owl burrows, observed owl sign, and observed burrowing owls were recorded and mapped with a GPS device.

In Step 2B, focused burrowing owl surveys consisted of seven site visits covering all project areas and adjacent areas.

Surveys were conducted in the morning 1 hour before sunrise to 2 hours after sunrise and 1 hour before sunset to 2 hours after sunset. Upon arrival at the survey area and prior to initiating the walking surveys, surveyors used binoculars and/or spotting scopes to scan all suitable habitats, as well as the location of mapped burrows, owl sign, and owls, including perch locations to ascertain owl presence. A survey for owls and owl sign was then conducted by walking through suitable habitat over the entire project site and within the adjacent 150- meter (500-foot) buffer zone. Results of the Step 2A surveys found no owl burrows on the proposed project site or in adjacent areas. In addition, Step 2B found no burrowing owls on the proposed project site or adjacent to the project site (Gonzalez 2020). Although no impacts to this species are anticipated as a result of construction activities, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 has been included to require a preconstruction burrowing owl survey to be conducted prior to the start of ground disturbance activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2, impacts related to burrowing owls would be less than significant.

The Habitat Assessment performed by Gonzales Environmental Consulting, LLC identified suitable habitat and substrate for raptors that are protected under the MSHCP, as well as migratory birds that are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503.5 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) code (Gonzalez 2020). Mitigation Measure BIO-3 has been included to require a qualified biologist to survey the project impact area for the presence of any active raptor nests seven days prior to the onset of construction activities during the raptor nesting season. Mitigation Measure BIO-4 has been included to require pre- construction nesting bird surveys, as well as recommendations for vegetation removal outside of the nesting bird season. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -3 and Mitigation Measure BIO-4, impacts related to protected bird species would also be reduced to a less than significant level.

The Habitat Assessment further describes that the special-status wildlife and plant species with the potential to occur on the project site are covered by compliance with the MSHCP, which requires payment of fees, included as existing Plans, Programs, or Policies “PPP BIO-1”.

Thus, through adherence to the recommendations provided in the Habitat Assessment, payment of the MSHCP mitigation fees (included as PPP BIO -1), and implementation of pre- construction nesting bird surveys, the project would be fully consistent with the MSCHP, CDFW, and USFWS, and impacts would be less than significant with implementation of MM BIO-1, MM BIO-2, MM BIO-3, and MM BIO-4.

b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

Response:

No Impact. The project site consists of vacant land that has been heavily disturbed by grading. The assessment done by Gonzales Environmental identified there are no state or federal streambed resources on the project site. In addition, □ □ □ [g]
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 42 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
MSHCP Section 6.12 riverine resources are not located on the project site, and as such the project does not require permits from Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, the project does not contain any vernal pools, wetland habitats, creeks, or rivers (Gonzalez 2020). Thus, impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would not occur from implementation of the proposed project.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?

Response:

No Impact. As described in the response above, the project site does not contain any drainages, creeks, rivers, or other wetland areas (Gonzalez 2020). The project site does not contain any jurisdictional areas that would be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and the proposed project does not involve any hydrological interruption on any existing water resources. Thus, impacts to federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act would not occur from implementation of the proposed project.

d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is vacant and undeveloped but is adjacent to roadways, disturbed, and developed land uses. Due to the existing conditions of the project site and the surrounding land uses, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors (Gonzalez 2020). There are no native wildlife nursery sites. However, as described previously, the site includes areas that are suitable for nesting birds that are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503.5 of the CDFW code. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO- 4 has been included to require pre-construction nesting bird surveys. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-4, impacts to native wildlife nursery sites would not occur and impacts would be less than significant.

e) Conflict with any local policies or ordina nces protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

Response:

No Impact. There are no local biological related policies or ordinances, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance that is applicable to the proposed project. The project site is adjacent to existing non-native ornamental trees that are on the right-of-way on Cactus Avenue, adjacent to the single-family residential areas to the north, and are not subject to any ordinances. The project site contains non- protected native shrubs and herbs as well as non- native grasses and shrubs and one nonnative palm tree. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with local poli ces or ordinances protecting trees and no impact would occur.

f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or another approved local , regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

Response:

Less than Significant Impact. The project site occurs within the Western Riverside County MSHCP. As described previously, the project site is located within the Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan of the MSHCP, but is not located within a Criteria Area Cell, Core, or Linkage. Furthermore, a habitat survey and surveys for burrowing owl have been conducted as outlined in response 4(a) and further preconstruction surveys and payment of fees would be conducted prior to construction as required by Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-4. Additionally, the project is required to pay applicable MSHCP fees prior to grading permit approval as outlined in PPP BIO -1. With implementation of PPP BIO -1 and MMs BIO-1 through BIO-4, development of the project site would not conflict with local, regional, or state resource □ □ □ ~
□ ~ □ □
□ □ □ ~
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 43 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
preservation and/or conservation policies. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur as a result of project implementation.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP BIO-1: MSHCP Development Impact Fees. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the project applicant will be required to pay relevant City of Moreno Valley mitigation fees to the City.

Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Payment of SKR Fees. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall pay all relevant Stephen’s kangaroo rat mitigation fees.

Mitigation Measure BIO -2: Preconstruction Burrowing Owl Surveys. Pursuant to the MSHCP Objective 6, for burrowing owl, a preconstruction burrowing owl survey shall be conducted prior to issuance of a grading permit to verify the presence/absence of the owl on the Project site. Within thirty days of the onset of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall survey within 500 feet of the Project site for the presence of any active owl burrows. Any active burrow found during survey efforts shall be mapped on the construction plans. If no active burrows are found, no further mitigation would be required. Results of the surveys shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley. If nesting activity is present at an active burrow, the active site shall be protected until nesting activity has ended to ensure compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. Nesting activity for burrowing owl in the region normally occurs between March and August. To protect the active burrow, the following restrictions to construction activities shall be required until the burrow is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist: (1) clearing limits shall be established within a 500- foot buffer around any active burrow, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist, and (2) access and surveying shall be restricted within 300 feet of any active burrow, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Any encroachment into the buffer area around the active burrow shall only be allowed if the biologist determines that the proposed activity will not disturb the nest occupants. Construction can proceed when the qualified biologist has determined that fledglings have left the nest. If an active burrow is observed during the non-nesting season, the nest site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, and when the raptor is away from the nest, the biologist will either actively or passively relocate the burrowing owl based on direction from the WRC RCA. The biologist shall then remove the burrow so the burrowing owl cannot return to the burrow. Therefore, based on the described construction activities and implementation of mitigation measures as identified, impacts to BUOW would not be significant.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Preconstruction Raptor Surveys. Seven days prior to the onset of construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30), a qualified biologist shall survey within 500 feet of the project impact area for the presence of any active raptor nests (common or special status). Any nest found during survey efforts shall be mapped on the construction plans. If no active nests are found, no further mitigation would be required. Results of the surveys shall be provided to the CDFW. If nesting activity is present at any raptor nest site, the active site shall be protected until nesting activity has ended to ensure compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. To protect any nest site, the following restrictions to construction activities are required until nests are no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist: (1) clearing limits shall be established within a 500- foot buffer around any occupied nest, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist, and (2) access and surveying shall be restricted within 300 feet of any occupied nest, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Any encroachment into the buffer area around the known nest shall only be allowed if the biologist determines that the proposed activity will not disturb the nest occupants. Construction can proceed when the qualified biologist has determined that fledglings have left the nest. If an active nest is observed during the non- nesting season, the nest site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, and when the raptor is away from the nest, the biologist will flush any raptor to open space areas. A qualified biologist, or construction personnel under the direction of the qualified biologist, shall then remove the nest site so raptors cannot return to a nest.

Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Preconstruction Nesting Bird Surveys. If construction is to occur during the MBTA nesting cycle (February 1-September 15) than a nesting bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered take and is potentially punishable by fines or imprisonment. Active bird nests should be mapped utilizing a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) and a 300’ buffer will be flagged around the nest (500’ buffer for raptor nests).

Construction should not be permitted within the buffer areas while the nest continues to be active (eggs, chicks, etc.).

Sources:

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 44 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.1 – Biological Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.9 – Biological Resources
- Figure 4.9-1 – Planning Area Biological Geographic Sections - Figure 4.9-2 – Planning Area Vegetation Community
- Figure 4.9-3 – Project Site Location within the MSHCP Area - Figure 4.9-4 – Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
• Appendix E – Biological Resources Study, Appendix E

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.17.030 G – Heritage Trees

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.60 – Threatened and Endangered Species

5. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), http://www.wrc-rca.org/about- rca/multiple-species-habitat-conservation-plan/

6. Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKRHCP), Governing Documents | RCHCA, CA

7. Habitat Assessment & Focused Surveys for Burrowing Owl. June 17, 2020. Prepared by Gonzalez Environmental Consulting, LLC (Appendix B).

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Response:

Less than Significant. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, a historical resource is defined as something that meets one or more of the following criteria:
1) Listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources; 2) Listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); 3) Identified as significant in a historical resources survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or 4) Determined to be a historical resource by the project’s Lead Agency.

As described previously, the project site is currently vacant. Historic aerial photographs and maps of the project site showed no development in the general vicinity of the project area until after 1976. All improvements, therefore, are less than 45 years of age and considered modern and of no historical consequence (McKenna 2020). Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no impact would occur.

b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Response:

Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview prepared for the project site included an archaeological records search that was completed at the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center (UCR -EIC). The UCR-EIC is the countywide clearing house/repository for all archaeological and cultural studies completed within the Riverside County. All pertinent data was researched, including previous studies for a one mile radius surrounding the project area and the identification of recorded resources within one mile. In addition, the research included review of the current listings (federal, state, and local) for evaluated resources and reviewed historic maps. The records search indicated that the nearest recorded resources are located more than one-half mile from the project site. There are no known significant cultural resources within the project area and any future development will not adversely impact any significant resources (McKenna 2020).

As required for compliance with CEQA guidelines and the data requirements of the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), an intensive field survey was conducted to adequately identify, describe, report, and, if possible, evaluate any cultural resources identified within the project area boundaries. This intensive field survey was conducted on March 7, 2020. No evidence of any prehistoric archaeological sites, prehistoric isolates, historic archaeological sites and/or historic isolates was found within the project area boundaries. In addition, no historic landscape or suggestion of ethic resources or □ □ ~ □
□ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 45 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
associations were found. Overall, the property was clear of any evidence of surface cultural resources and the potential for buried resources was determined to be extremely low to nonexistent (McKenna 2020).

Based on the negative findings presented above, there are no known cultural resources, significant or not, within or adjacent to the project area. In addition, as discussed previously, based on the results of the cultural resources search and survey, evidence of surface cultural resources and the potential for buried resources was determined to be extremely low to nonexistent (McKenna 2020). Nevertheless, due to archaeological sensitivity in the City and project vicinity, Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-5 would be implemented by the project and require archaeological monitoring, a Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP), measures for inad vertent finds, and Archeology Reports. With
implementation of Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -5, impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant.

c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formally dedicated cemeteries?
Response:

Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site has not been previously used as a cemetery. Thus, human remains are not anticipated to be uncovered during project construction. In addition, procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains on non-federal lands have been mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Section 15064.5, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, which has been included as Mitigation Measure CR -6. Specifically, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered, disturbance of the site shall remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation into the circumstances, manner, and cause of death, and made recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human re
mains to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.

Thus, with compliance with Mitigation Measure CR-6, no impacts would occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures

Mitigation Measure CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities. The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s) including the Pechanga Band of Indians, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a CRMP as defined in Mitigation Measure CR-2. The Project archeologist shall attend the pre- grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

The archaeological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

Mitigation Measure CR -2: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting Tribe is defined as a Tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project description and location
b. Project grading and development scheduling;
c. Roles and responsibilities of individuals on the Project; d. The pre-grading meeting and Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training details; e. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe (s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. □ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 46 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f. The type of recordation needed for inadvertent finds and the stipulations of recordation of sacred items. g. Contact information of relevant individuals for the Project;

Mitigation Measure CR-3: The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan:
“If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground –disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find."

Mitigation Measure CR-4: Inadvertent Finds. If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to Project approval, all ground disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologist and Tribal Monitors, if needed. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration, and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in Mitigation Measure CR-1 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

Mitigation Measure CR-5: Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitorin
g Report that complies with the Community Development
Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Mitigation Measure CR-6: Human Remains. If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains (California Public Resources Code 5097.98). (GP Objective 23.3, CEQA).

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.2 – Cultural and Historical Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.10 – Cultural Resources
- Figure 4.10-1 – Locations of Listed Historic Resource Inventory Structures - Figure 4.10-2 – Location of Prehistoric Sites
- Figure 4.10-3 – Paleontological Resource Sensitive Areas • Appendix F – Cultural Resources Analysis, Study of Historical and Archaeological Resources for the Revised General Plan, City of Moreno Valley, Archaeological Associates, August 2003.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 47 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Title 7 – Cultural Preservation

5. Cultural Resources Inventory for the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California, prepared by Daniel F.

McCarthy, Archaeological Research Unit, University of California, Riverside, October 1987 ( This document cannot be provided to the public due to the inclusion of confidential information pursuant to Government Code Section 6254.10.)

6. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview for Tentative Tract Map No. 37858, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. March 18, 2020. Prepared by McKenna et al. (Appendix C).

VI. ENERGY – Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is currently vacant. The Southern California Gas Company provides natural gas to the surrounding area. Additionally, Southern California Edison currently provides electricity services to the surrounding area. The proposed project would install onsite electrical and natural gas infrastructure that would connect to the existing offsite lines.

Construction
During construction of the proposed project, energy would be consumed in three general forms:

1. Petroleum-based fuels used to power off -road construction vehicles and equipment on the project sites, construction worker travel to and from the project sites, as well as delivery truck trips;

2. Electricity associated with providing temporary power for lighting and electric equipment; and

3. Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass.

Construction activities related to the proposed building and the associated infrastructure would not be expected to result in demand for fuel greater on a per-unit-of-development basis than other development projects in southern California. In addition, the extent of construction activities that would occur is limited to a 12-month period, and the demand for construction-related electricity and fuels would be limited to that time frame.

Construction contractors are required to demonstrate compliance with applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of heavy -duty diesel on- and off -road equipment as part of the City’s construction permitting process. In addition, compliance with existing CARB idling restrictions would reduce fuel combustion and energy consumption. The energy modeling shows that project construction electricity usage over the 12- month construction period is estimated to use 14,517 gallons of diesel fuel, as shown in Table E-1.

Table E-1: Estimated Construction Equipment Diesel Fuel Consumption Activity Equipment Project
Number
Project
Hours
per
day
Default
Horse-
power
Default
Load
Factor
Days of
Construction
Total
Horsepower-
hours
Fuel
Rate
(gal/hp-
hr)
Fuel Use
(gallons)
Site
Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozer 3 8 247 0.4 10 23,712 0.020461 485
Crawler Tractor 4 8 212 0.43 10 29,171 0.022173 647
Grading
Excavators 1 8 158 0.38 30 28,819 0.019763 570
Graders 1 8 187 0.41 30 18,401 0.021143 389
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 30 23,712 0.020461 485
Crawler Tractor 3 8 212 0.43 30 65,635 0.022173 1,455
Building
Construction
Crane 1 7 231 0.29 200 93,786 0.014896 1,397
Forklifts 3 8 89 0.2 200 85,440 0.019105 1,632
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37 200 150,738 0.023965 3,612 Welders 1 8 46 0.45 200 33,120 0.023965 794
Generator Set 1 8 84 0.74 200 99,456 0.023965 2,383
Paving Pavers 2 8 130 0.42 20 17,472 0.021525 376
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 48 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Paving Equipment 2 8 132 0.36 20 15,206 0.018334 279
Rollers 2 8 80 0.38 20 9,728 0.019412 189
Architectural
Coating Air Compressor 1 6 78 0.48 20 4,493 0.023965 108 TOTAL 14,517
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

Table E-2 shows that construction workers would use approximately 5,278 gallons of fuel to travel to and from the project site, and haul trucks and vendor trucks would use approximately 5,254 gallons of diesel fuel.

Table E-2: Estimated Construction Vehicle Trip Related Fuel Consumption Construction Source Gallons of Diesel
Fuel
Gallons of
Gasoline Fuel
Haul Trucks 2,902 0
Vendor Trucks 2,352 0
Worker Vehicles 0 5,278
Construction Vehicles Total 5,254 5,278
Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

Overall, construction activities would comply with all existing regulations, and would therefore not be expected to use fuel in a wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary manner. Thus, impacts related to construction energy usage would be less than significant.

Operation
Once operational, the project would generate demand for electricity, natural gas, as well as gasoline for motor vehicle trips. Operational use of energy includes the heating, cooling, and lighting of the residences, water heating, operation of electrical systems and plug-in appliances, and outdoor lighting, and the transport of electricity, natural gas, and water to the residences where they would be consumed. This use of energy is typical for urban development, no additional energy infrastructure would be required to be built to operate the project, and no operational activities would occur that would result in extraordinary energy consumption.

The proposed project would be required to meet the current Title 24 energy efficiency standards. The City’s administration of the Title 24 requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures that occurs during the permitting process, which ensures that all requirements are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of energy-efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (HVAC); solar-reflective roofing materials; energy - efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems; reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; and incorporation of skylights, etc. In complying with the Title 24 standards, impacts to peak energy usage periods would be minimized, and impacts on statewide and regional energy needs would be reduced. As detailed in Table E -3, operation of the proposed project is estimated to result in the annual use of approximately 47,536 gallons o f fuel, approximately 348,659 kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity, and approximately 1,223,850 thousand British thermal units (kBTU) of natural gas. Thus, operation of the project would not use large amounts of energy or fuel in a wasteful manner, and operational energy impacts would be less than significant.

Table E-3: Estimated Annual Operational Energy Consumption Operational Source
(value per year)
Energy Source Annual VMT Gallons of
Gasoline Fuel
Transportation – Project 1,283,482 47,536(1)
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 49 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

Thousands Kilowatt-Hours
Electricity – Project 348,659

Thousands British Thermal Units
Natural Gas – Project 1,223,850
Note:
(1) Based on an average fleet fuel consumption rate of 27 mile/gallon based on EMFAC2017 fuel use and CalEEMod fleet miles. Source: see Fuel Usage Spreadsheet and CalEEMod output Source: CalEEMod Emission Summary (Appendix A)

b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Response:

No Impact. The proposed project would be required to meet the CalGreen energy efficiency standards in effect during permitting of the project. The City’s administration of the requirements includes review of design components and energy conservation measures during the permitting process, which ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the project would not conflict with or obstruct opportunities to use renewable energy, such as solar energy. As discussed, the project proposes to use photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on each of the residences to offset their energy demand in accordance with Title 24. As such, the project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts would not occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies

PPP GHG-1: CalGreen Compliance, provided in Section 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Mitigation Measures

None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.6 – Energy Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Summary of CalEEMod Model Runs and Output for the Moreno Valley Residential Project. March 24, 2020.

Prepared by Vince Mirabella (Appendix A).

5. City of Moreno Valley Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy. Accessed at:
http://www.moval.org/pdf/efficiency-climate112012nr.pdf (Accessed May 27, 2021).

VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Documents/SP_042.pdf

□ □ □ ~
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 50 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response:

No Impact. The project site is not located within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or County of Riverside Fault zone. As described by the Preliminary Soil Investigation prepared for the proposed project, the nearest known active fault zone is the San Jacinto fault zone located approximately 2.78 miles from the project site (GEO 2020). Thus, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects from rupture of a known earthquake fault that is delineated on an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, and impacts would not occur.

ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located within a seismically active region of Southern California. As mentioned previously, the San Jacinto Fault is located approximately 2.78 miles from the site (GEO 2020). Thus, moderate to strong ground shaking can be expected at the site. The amount of motion can vary depending upon the distance to the fault, the magnitude of the earthquake, and the local geology. Greater movement can be expected at sites located closer to an earthquake epicenter, that consists of poorly consolidated material such as alluvium, and in response to an earthquake of great magnitude.

Structures built in the City are required to be built in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), included in the Municipal Code as Chapter 8.20. In addition, PPP GEO -1 has bee n included to provide provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soils onsite, and the probable strength of the ground motion. Compliance with the CBC would include the incorporation of: 1) seismic safety features to minimize the potential for significant effects as a result of earthquakes; 2) proper building footings and foundations; and 3) construction of the building structures so that it would withstand the effects of strong ground shaking.

Because the proposed project would be constructed in compliance with the CBC, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking.

iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated, cohesionless soils layers, located within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, lose strength due to cyclic pore water pressure generation from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. During the loss of stress, the soil acquires “mobility” sufficient to permit both horizontal and vertical movements. Soil properties and soil conditions such as type, age, texture, color, and consistency, along with historical depths to ground water are used to identify, characterize, and correlate liquefaction susceptible soils.

Soils that are most susceptible to liquefaction are clean, loose, saturated, and uniformly graded fine- grained sands that lie below the groundwater table within approximately 50 feet below ground surface. Lateral spreading is a form of seismic ground failure due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer.

According to the Preliminary Soil Investigation for the proposed project, the site is located within an area of moderate liquefaction potential. Liquefaction is a process in which strong ground shaking causes saturated soils to lose their strength and behave as a fluid. The potential for and magnitude of lateral spreading is dependent upon many conditions, including the presence of a relatively thick, continuous, potentially liquefiable sand layer and high slopes. Subsurface information obtained from the Preliminary Soil Investigation indicates that after compaction onsite soils, indicated
settlement of saturated sands is 0 inches and unsaturated sands is 1.14 inches. Based on currently available procedures, the site does not appear to be susceptible to lateral spread during a moderate seismic event. In addition, the Preliminary Soil Investigation determined that groundwater, seepage or wet soils were not encountered in exploratory borings drilled to a maximum depth of 50 feet (GEO 2020).

In addition, as described previously, structures built in the City are required to be built in compliance with the CBC, as included in the City’s Municipal Code as Chapter 8.20 (and herein as PPP GEO -1), which implements specific requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls and site demolition. Compliance with the CBC, as included as PPP GEO -1, would require specific engineeri ng design recommendations be incorporated into grading plans and building specifications as a condition of construction permit approval to ensure that project structures would withstand the effects of seismic ground movement, including liquefaction and set tlement. Compliance with the □ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 51 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
requirements of the CBC and City’s municipal code for structural safety (included as PPP GEO-1) would reduce hazards from seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction and settlement to a less than significant level.

iv) Landslides?
Response:

No Impact. Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that are common during or soon after earthquakes. Areas that are most susceptible to earthquakes induced landslides are steep slopes underlain by loose, weak soils, and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits.

As described above, the project site is located in a seismically active region subject to strong ground shaking. However, the project site is flat and does not contain any hills or any other areas that could be subject to landslides. In addition, the local vicinity is flat and does not contain any hills. Therefore, the project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects related to slope instability or seismically induced landslides.

b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the project has the potential to contribute to soil erosion and the loss of topsoil. Grading and excavation activities that would be required for the proposed project would expose and loosen topsoil, which could be eroded by wind or water.

The City’s Municipal Code Section 8.21.170 implements all applicable requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), and all projects in the City are required to conform to the permit requirements. This includes installation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with the NPDES permit, which establishes minimum stormwater management requirements and controls that are required to be implemented for the proposed project. To reduce the potential for soil erosion and the loss of topsoil, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations to be developed by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer). The SWPPP is required to address site- specific conditions related to specific grading and construction activities such as, potential sources of erosion and sedimentation loss of topsoil during construction, and identification of erosion control BMPs to reduce or eliminate the erosion and loss of topsoil, such as use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, or gravel bags, stabilized construction entrance/exit, hydroseeding. With compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, RWQCB requirements, and the BMPs in the SWPPP that are required to be prepared to implement the project (included as PPP WQ -1), construction impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant.

In addition, the proposed project includes installation of landscaping, such that during operation of the project substantial areas of loose topsoil that could erode would not exist. In addition, as described in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the onsite drainage features that would be installed by the project have been designed to slow, filter, and slowly discharge stormwater into the offsite drainage system, which would also reduce the potential for stormwater to erode topsoil during project operations. Furthermore, implementation of the project requires City approval of a site specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which would ensure that the City’s Municipal Code, RWQCB requirements, and appropriate operational BMPs would be implemented to minimize or eliminate the potential for soil erosion or loss of topsoil to occur. As a result, potential impacts related to substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than significant.

c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-si te landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. As described above, the project site is flat, and does not contain nor is adjacent to any slope or hillside area. The project would not create slopes. Thus, on or off -site landslides would not occur from implementation of the project.

□ □ □ [g]
□ □ [g] □
□ □ [g] □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 52 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Lateral spreading, a phenomenon associated with seismically induced soil liquefaction, is a display of lateral displacement of soils due to inertial motion and lack of lateral support during or post liquefaction. It is typically exemplified by the formation of vertical cracks on the surface of liquefied soils, and usually takes place on gently sloping ground or level ground with nearby free surface such as drainage or stream channel. According to the Preliminary Soil Investigation, subsurface information indicates that high slopes are not anticipated. In addition, based on currently available procedures, the site does not appear to be susceptible to (lateral spread) ground surface disruption during a moderate seismic event (GEO 2020). Thus, the soils are not susceptible to lateral spreading and impacts related to liquefaction and lateral spreading would be less than significant.

Differential settlement or subsidence could occur if buildings or other improvements are built on low-strength foundation materials (including imported fill) or if improvements straddle the boundary between different types of subsurface materials (e.g., a boundary between native material and fill). Although differential settlement generally occurs slowly enough that its effects are not dangerous to inhabitants, it can cause building damage over time. Seismic settlement in dry soils generally occurs in loose sands and silty sands, with cohesive soils being less prone to significant settlement.

The Preliminary Soil Investigation determined that overexcavation and recompaction of loose surficial soils are anticipated to provide adequate and uniform support for the proposed structures (GEO 2020). Project design and implementation would comply with the recommendations of the required Preliminary Soil Investigation prepared for the project site, which would ensure impacts related to settlement and subsidence would be less than significant.

In summary, with implementation of the recommendations in the project’s Preliminary Soil Investigation, potentially significant impacts related to unstable soils or geologic units that would become unstable as a result of the project, resulting in on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse, would be reduced to a less than significant level, and no mitigation would be required.

d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or well as the moisture content changes; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils. Arid or semiarid areas with seasonal changes of soil moisture experiences, such as southern California, have a higher potential of expansive soils than areas with higher rainfall and more constant soil moisture.

The Preliminary Soil Investigation performed an evaluation of the potential for expansive soils at the site, which determined that the expansion potential of onsite near surface silty sands is expected to be very low (El<20) (GEO 2020).

However, as described previously, compliance with the CBC, included as PPP GEO-1, would require specific engineering design recommendations be incorporated into grading plans and building specifications as a condition of construction permit approval to ensure that project structures would withstand the effects of related to ground movement, includin g expansive soils. Thus, impacts would be less than significant.

e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?

Response:

No Impact. The project would not use septic tanks or alternative methods for disposal of wastewater into subsurface soils. Furthermore, the proposed project would connect to existing public wastewater infrastructure. Therefore, the project would not result in any impacts related to septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal methods. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Response:

Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Phase 1 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment prepared for the project included a locality search through the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) to identify any previously identified paleontological resources near the project site. □ □ ~ □
□ □ □ ~
□ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 53 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

The Phase 1 Cultural and Paleontological Overview determined that the project area consists of surficial deposits of younger Quaternary deposits overlying older Quaternary deposits. The younger deposits are not conducive to yielding paleontological specimens. However, the deeper, older alluvial deposits may, in fact, yield such resources. The project area should be considered sensitive for buried paleontological resources (McKenna 2020).

Therefore, based on the results of the Phase I Paleontological Resources Assessment, the project area is considered to have high sensitivity for the potential to impact paleontological resources during construction activities at or below 5 feet in undisturbed sedimentary deposits. McKenna recommends preparation of a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Plan (PRIMP) prior to construction excavation. Thus, Mitigation Measure PAL-1 has been included to require preparation of a PRMP and that a professional paleontologist be hired to oversee monitoring. With implementation of Mitigation Measure PAL-1, impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP GEO-1: California Building Code. The project is required to comply with the California Building Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 8.20 to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards.

California Building Code related and geologist and/or civil engineer specifications for the project are required to be incorporated into grading plans and specifications as a condition of project approval.

PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, provided in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality.

PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan, provided in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality.

Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure PAL -1: Paleontological Resources. A paleontologist selected from the roll of qualified paleontologists maintained by the City shall be retained to provide spot -check monitoring services for the project. The paleontologist shall develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Plan (PRIMP) to mitigate the potential impacts to unknown buried paleontological resources that may exist onsite. The PRIMP shall require that the paleontologist be present at the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance. The PRIMP shall require paleontological spot-check monitoring of excavation that exceeds depths of 5 feet. The PRIMP shall state that the project paleontologist shall re-evaluate the necessity for paleontological monitoring after 50 percent or greater of the excavations deeper than 5 feet have been completed.

In the event that paleontological resources are encountered, ground- disturbing activity within 50 feet of the area of the discovery shall cease. The paleontologist shall examine the materials encountered, assess the nature and extent of the find, and recommend a course of action to further investigate and protect or recover and salvage those resources that have been encountered.

Criteria for discard of specific fossil specimens will be made explicit. If a qualified paleontologist determines that impacts to a sample containing significant paleontological resources cannot be avoided by project planning, then recovery may be applied. Actions may include recovering a sample of the fossiliferous material prior to construction, monitoring work and halting construction if an important fossil needs to be recovered, and/or cleaning, identifying, and cataloging specimens for curation and research purposes. Recovery, salvage and treatment shall be done at the applicant’s expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation by the paleontologist. Resources shall be identified and curated into an established accredited professional repository. The paleontologist shall have a repository agreement in hand prior to initiating recovery of the resource.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.5 – Geologic Hazards - Figure 5-3 – Geologic Faults & Liquefaction
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.4 -- Soils

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.6 – Geology and Soils
- Figure 4.6-1 – Geology
- Figure 4.6-2 – Seismic Hazards
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 54 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.21 – Grading Regulations

5. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, adopted October 4, 2011, amended 2017, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/haz-mit-plan.pdf • Chapter 4 – Earthquake
- Figure 3-1 – Right-Lateral Strike -Slip Fault
- Figure 3-1.1 – Moreno Valley Geologic Faults and Liquefaction 2016 - Figure 3-1.2 – Moreno Valley Area Ground Shaking Map
• Chapter 8 – Landslide
- Figure 7-1 – Moreno Valley Slope Analysis 2016

6. Emergency Operations Plan, City of Moreno Valley, March 2009, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/mv-eop-0309.pdf • Threat Assessment 1 – Major Earthquakes
- Figure 8 – Types of Faults
- Figure 9 – Earthquake Faults
- Figure 11 – Comparison of Richter Magnitude and Modified Mercalli Intensity - Figure 12 – Magnitude 4.5 or Greater Earthquake Map
- Figure 13 – Geologic Faults and Liquefaction

7. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview for Tentative Tract Map No. 37858, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. March 18, 2020. Prepared by McKenna et al. (Appendix D).

8. Preliminary Soil Investigation, Infiltr ation Test and Liquefaction Evaluation Report, Proposed Residential Development Site (41 Lots), Cactus Avenue and Bradshaw Circle (APN 478- 090-018, -024 and -025), City of Moreno Valley, California. January 21, 2020. Prepared by Soil Exploration Company, Inc. (Appendix E).

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 55 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:

GHG Thresholds
The City of Moreno Valley has not adopted a numerical significance threshold to evaluate greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts. SCAQMD does not have approved thresholds; however, it does have draft thresholds that provides a tiered approach to evaluate GHG impacts, which includes the following:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. • Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions. • Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
o Residential and Commercial land use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e per year
o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,820 MTCO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year

The SCAQMD’s draft threshold uses the Executive Order S-3-05 year 2050 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. Therefore, for purposes of examining potential GHG impacts from implementation of the proposed project, and to provide a conservative analysis of potential impacts, the Tier 3 screening level for all land use projects of 3,000 MTCO2e was selected as the significance threshold (AQ 2020).

In addition, SCAQMD methodology for project’s construction are to average them over 30- years and then add them to the project’s operational emissions to determine if the project would exceed the screening values listed above (AQ 2020).

Climate Action Plan
The City of Moreno Valley adopted an Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy document in 2012. The Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy is a policy document which identifies ways that the City can reduce energy and water consumption and GHG emissions as an organization (its employees and the operation of its facilities) and outlines the actions that the City can encourage and community members can employ to reduce their own energy and water consumption and GHG emissions. The project involves the construction and operation of 37 single-family residences that would fall under the scope of these policies.

a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities produce GHG emissions from various sources, such as site excavation, grading, utility engines, heavy-duty construction vehicles onsite, equipment hauling materials to and from the site, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew.

In addition, operation of the proposed residences would result in area and indirect sources of operational GHG emissions that would primarily result from vehicle trips, electricity and natural gas consumption, water transport (the energy used to pump water), and solid waste generation. GHG emissions from electricity consumed by the residences would be generated off-site by fuel combustion at the electricity provider. GHG emissions from water transport are also indirect emissions resulting from the energy required to transport water from its source.

□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 56 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The estimated operational GHG emissions that would be generated from implementation of the proposed project are shown in Table GHG-1.3 Additionally, in accordance with SCAQMD recommendation, the project’s amortized construction related GHG emissions are added to the operational emissions estimate in order to determine the project’s total annual GHG emissions.

Table GHG-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Activity Annual GHG
Emissions (MTCO2e)
Project Operational Emissions
Area
Energy
Mobile
Waste
Water
Total

0 150
585
24 16
775
Project Construction Emissions 15
Project Construction and
Operation
790
Significance Threshold 3,000
Project Exceeds Threshold? No
Source: CalEEMod, Appendix A
As shown on Table GHG -1, the combined construction and operation of the project would result in a total increase in GHG emissions of 790 MTCO2e per year, which would not exceed the significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year.4 Therefore, impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions would be less than significant.

b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of greenhouse
gases?

Response:

No Impact. The proposed project would redevelop the site with single- family residences that would comply with state programs that are designed to be energy efficient. The proposed project would comply with all mandatory measures under the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CalGreen Code, which would provide efficient energy and water consumption. The City’s administration of the requirements includes review of the energy conservation measures during the permitting process, which ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the project includes photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to offset the energy demand. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP GHG-1: CalGreen Compliance. The project is required to comply with the CalGreen Building Code as included in the City’s Municipal Code to ensure efficient use of energy. CalGreen specifications are required to be incorporated into building plans as a condition of building permit approval.

3 It should be noted the GHG analysis analyzed 38 dwelling units based on an earlier iteration of the project’s site plan. As the project proposes 37 dwelling units, the project-generated emissions calculated in the GHG analysis are therefore highly conservative. 4 It should be noted that the air quality analysis was modeled using CalEEMod Version 2020.4 (V2020.4). The latest version of CalEEMod, V2022.1, was run for the project using 11th Edition Trip rates and found that GHG impacts from construction & operation would continue to be less than significant utilizing the latest CalEEMod version.
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 57 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, prepared by the California Air Resources Board, November 2017, https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf, (Accessed May 27, 2021)

5. Summary of CalEEMod Model Runs and Output for the Moreno Valley Residential Project. March 24, 2020.

Prepared by Vince Mirabella (Appendix A).

6. City of Moreno Valley Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Strategy. Accessed at:
http://www.moval.org/pdf/efficiency-climate112012nr.pdf (Accessed May 27, 2021)

IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. A hazardous material is defined as any material that, due to its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment if released into the environment. Hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, and any material that regulatory agencies have a reasonable basis for believing would be injurious to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the home, workplace, or environment. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment.

Construction
The proposed construction activities would involve the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as paints, solvents, oils, grease, and caulking during construction activities. In addition, hazardous materials would routinely be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, and disposal of these materials are regulated by federal and state regulations that are implemented by the City during building permitting for construction activities. Construction would also include temporary dewatering during excavation for utility installations if the excavation is deep enough to encounter groundwater.

If such excavations are in the vicinity of the impacted groundwater in the northeast portion of the site, the water would either be contained and transported to a licensed off -site treatment facility or treated on site before discharge under a county permit to the sanitary sewer. As a result, construction of the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
The project involves operation of 37 new single-family residences. Residential uses typically do not present a hazard associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment because residents are not anticipated to use, store, dispose, or transport large volumes of hazardous materials. Hazardous substances associated with residential uses are typically limited in both amount and use. Project operation would involve the use of potentially hazardous materials (e.g., solvents, cleaning agents, paints, fertilizers, and pesticides) typical of residential uses that, when used correctly and in compliance with existing laws and regulations, would not result in a significant hazard to people in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts associated with the disposal of hazardous materials and/or the potential release of hazardous materials that could occur with the implementation of the proposed project would be less than significant.

□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 58 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. A Phase I ESA was prepared by Robin Environmental Management (REM) in April 2020 for the project site. The purpose of the Phase I analysis was to evaluate the project site for potential Recognized Environmental Concerns (RECs) that may be present, off -site conditions that may impact the subject property, and/or conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the project site.

ASTM defines a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) as ”the presence or likel y presence of an hazardous substance or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: 1) due to release to the environment; 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.”

The Phase I ESA was performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E-1527-13 with a field survey of the subject site and adjacent properties on April 15, 2020.

According to the Phase I, the subject property was not recognized being listed on the following environmental regulatory database record research (NETR database): NPL, RCRA -TSD, CERCLIS, NFRAP, RCRA-

G, ERNS, CORRACTS,
CORTESE, CALSITES, LUST, UST, and SWF (Phase I 2020). In addition, based on the conducted government records search, there is one Emergency Response Notification System site (the 22520 Cactus Ave site) shown as a potential environmental concern within the vicinity of the project site. However, the Phase I checked the location of 22520 Cactus Avenue site, a Chevron gas station, via internet search and concluded that the 22520 Cactus Avenue site is actually located in the southwestern portion of the City of Moreno Valley, several miles to the west of the subject property, and was misplaced by the conducted government records search as nearby site with environmental concern (Phase I 2020).

Thus, there are no records of potential environmental concerns within the vicinity of the project site.

Based on site observations, interviews and review of available documents and the database records search, the Phase I concluded that there is no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property and no Phase II (subsurface investigation) environmental assessment would be required (Phase I 2020). Thus, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment and impacts would be less than significant.

c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed residential project would not produce hazardous emissions or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes. The nearest school to the project site is Ridge Crest Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.3 miles southeast of the project site. Thus, the proposed project is not within one-quarter mile of an existing school. In addition, the proposed project is not anticipated to release hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes in significant quantities. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would use a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances/oils during heavy equipment operation for site excavation, grading, and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be contained in compliance with existing government regulations.

Residences would not require the use, storage, disposal, or transport of large volumes of hazardous materials that could cause serious environmental damage in the event of an accident. Although hazardous substances would be present and utilized at these residences, such substances are generally present now in the existing development, are typically found in small quantities, and can be cleaned up without affecting the environment. Therefore, impacts related to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school would be less than significant.

□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 59 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?

Response:

No Impact. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I 2020) prepared for the project conducted a database search to determine if the project site or any nearby properties are identified as having hazardous materials. The Phase I record search determined that the project site was not recognized being listed on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Phase I 2020). As a result, impacts related to hazards from being located on or adjacent to a hazardous materials site would not occur from implementation of the proposed project.

e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

Response:

Less than Significant Impact. The project site is not within 2 miles of an airport. The nearest airport is the March Air Reserve Base that is located approximately 5.2 miles west of the project site. According to the March Air Reserve Base Land Use Compati bility Plan, the proposed project is not located in a compatibility zone. Additionally, the residential development would not be of a sufficient height to require modifications to the existing air traffic patterns at the airport and, therefore, would not affect aviation traffic levels or otherwise result in substantial aviation -related safety risks.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in impacts to an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, and would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. As such, impacts would be less than significant.

f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Construction
Short-term construction activities would occur within the project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Any temporary lane closures needed for utility connections to Bradshaw Circle or Cactus Avenue, or driveway access construction would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual (Caltrans 2014), as incorporated into the construction permits. Thus, impacts related to an emergency response or evacuation plan during construction would be less than significant.

Operation
Direct access to the project site would be provided from Bradshaw Circle by two driveways. The project is required to provide internal streets and fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers) that conform to the California Fire Code requirements, included as Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, as verified through the City’s permitting process. As such, the project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant.

g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Response:

No Impact. The project site is not within an area identified as a Fire Hazard Area that may contain substantial fire risk or a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) (CAL FIRE 2020). Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires and impact s would not occur.
□ □ □ ~
□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 60 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.2.8 – Wildland Urban Interface • Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.9 – Hazardous Materials • Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.10 – Air Crash Hazards - Figure 5-5 – Air Crash Hazards

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.5 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
- Figure 4.5-1 – Hazardous Materials Sites
- Figure 4.5-2 – Floodplains and High Fire Hazard Areas - Figure 4.5-3 – City Areas Affected by Aircraft Hazard Zones

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. March Air Reserve Base (MARB)/March Inland Port (MIP) Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) on November 13, 2014, (http://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/17%20 - %20Vol.%201%20March%20Air%20Reserve%20Base%20Final.pdf?ver=2016-08-15-145812-700)

5. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, adopted October 4, 2011, amended 2017, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/haz-mit-plan.pdf • Chapter 5 – Wildland and Urban Fires
- Figure 4-2 – Moreno Valley High Fire Area Map 2016
• Chapter 12 – Dam Failure/Inundation
- Figure 12-2 Moreno Valley Evacuation Routes Map 2015
• Chapter 13 – Pipeline
- Figure 13-1 – Moreno Valley Pipeline Map 2016
• Chapter 14 – Transportation
- Figure 14-1.1 – Moreno Valley Air Crash Hazard Area Map 2016 • Chapter 16 – Hazardous Materials Accident
- Moreno Valley Hazardous Materials Site Locations Map 2016

6. Emergency Operations Plan, City of Moreno Valley, March 2009, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/mv-eop-0309.pdf • Hazard Mitigation and Hazard Analysis
• Threat Assessment 2 – Hazardous Materials
• Threat Assessment 3 – Wildfire
• Threat Assessment 6 – Transportation Emergencies
- Figure 17 – Air Crash Hazards

7. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2020. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map.

Accessed:
https://forestwatch.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Styler/index.html?appid=5e96315793d445419b6c96f89ce5d153 (Accessed May 26, 2021).

8. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, APN 478- 090-018, 024, & 025, Moreno Valley, CA. April 30, 2020.

Prepared by Robin Environmental Management (REM) (Appendix F).

9. March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. November 13, 2014. Adopted by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC). Accessed: http://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/17%20- %20Vol.%201%20March%20Air%20Reserve%20Base%20Final.pdf (Accessed May 26, 2021).

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 61 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
Implementation of the proposed project includes site preparation, construction of new buildings, and infrastructure improvements. Grading, stockpiling of materials, excavation, construction of new structures, and landscaping activities would expose and loosen sediment and building materials, which would have the potential to mix with stormwater and urban runoff and degrade surface and receiving water quality.

Additionally, construction generally requires the use of heavy equipment and construction- related materials and chemicals, such as concrete, cement, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, transmission fluid, grease, solvents, and paints. In the absence of proper controls, these potentially harmful materials could be accidentally spilled or improperly dispo sed of during construction activities and could wash into and pollute surface waters or groundwater, resulting in a significant impact to water quality.

Pollutants of concern during construction activities generally include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (such as paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete -related waste may be spilled or leaked during construction, which would have the potential to be transported via storm runoff into nearby receiving waters and eventually may affect surface or groundwater quality. During construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, thereby increasing the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation to occur compared to existing conditions. In addition, during construction, vehicles and equipment are prone to tracking soil and/or spoil from work areas to paved roadways, which is another form of erosion that could affect water quality.

However, the use of BMPs during construction implemented as part of a SWPPP as required by the NPDES General Construction Permit and included as PPP WQ -1 would serve to ensure that project impacts related to construction activities resulting in a degradation of water quality would be less than significant. Furthermore, an Erosion and Sediment Transport Control Plan prepared by a qualified SWPPP developer (QSD) is required to be included in the SWPPP for the project, and typically includes the following types of erosion control methods that are designed to minimize potential pollutants entering stormwater during construction:
• Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped areas;
• Perimeter gravel bags or silt fences to prevent off-site transport of sediment; • Storm drain inlet protection (filter fabric gravel bags and straw wattles), with gravel bag check dams within paved roadways;
• Regular sprinkling of exposed soils to control dust during construction and soil binders for forecasted wind storms; • Specifications for construction waste handling and disposal; • Contained equipment wash-out and vehicle maintenance areas; • Erosion control measures including soil binders, hydro mulch, geotextiles, and hydro seeding of disturbed areas ahead of forecasted storms;
• Construction of stabilized construction entry/exits to prevent trucks from tracking sediment on City roadways; • Construction timing to minimize soil exposure to storm events; and • Training of subcontractors on general site housekeeping.

Therefore, compliance with the Statewide General Construction Activity Stormwater Permit requirements, included as PPP WQ-1, which would be verified during the City’s construction permitting process, would ensure that project impacts related to construction activities resulting in a degradation of water quality would be less than significant.

Operation
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 62 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project includes operation of single -family residential uses. Potential pollutants associated with the proposed uses include various chemicals from cleaners, pathogens from pet wastes, nutrients from fertilizer, pesticides and sediment from landscaping, trash and debris, and oil and grease from vehicles. If these pollutants discharge into surface waters, it could result in degradation of water quality.

In the existing condition, site drainage sheet flows across the property to the west towards Bradshaw Circle. A portion of the site’s drainage, identified as Area 1, flows southerly to Cactus Avenue where it is collected by a series of catch basins within Cactus Avenue, and is ultimately directed into an offsite storm drain. Onsite drainage flows within Area 2 flow offsite towards Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue where the flows are collected by a series of existing catch basins along Cactus Avenue. (Hydrology 2021)

In the developed condition, onsite flows would be conveyed to one of two onsite bioretention basins (Lots A and B), and these basins would connect to a new 24-inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle which would connect to the existing RCFC Storm Drain Line F-4 in Cactus Avenue. The project would result in a net incremental increase of 0.49 cubic feet per second of flow to the storm drain in Cactus Avenue; however, the storm drain would be able to accommodate this increase without impact nor would offsite properties be impacted. (Hydrology 2021)

As described previously, the WQMP is required to be approved prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. The project’s WQMP would be reviewed and approved by the City to ensure it complies with the Santa Ana RWQCB MS4 Permit regulations. In addition, the City’s permitting process would ensure that all BMPs in the WQMP would be implemented with the project. Overall, implementation of the WQMP pursuant to the existing regulations (included as PPP WQ-2), would ensure that operation of the proposed project would not violate any water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or otherwise degrade water quality; and impacts would be less than significant.

b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. EMWD’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) describes that EMWD’s local supplies include groundwater, desalinated groundwater, and recycled water. 5 Groundwater is pumped from the Hemet/San Jacinto and West San Jacinto areas of the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin. Groundwater in portions of the West San Jacinto Basin is high in salinity and requires desalination for potable use. EMWD owns and operates t wo desalination plants that convert brackish groundwater from the West San Jacinto Basin into potable water. EMWD also owns, operates, and maintains its own recycled water system that consists of four Regional Water Reclamation Facilities and several storage ponds spread throughout EMWD’s service area that are all connected through the recycled water system.

As detailed on Table WQ- 1, the EMWD’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) shows that the anticipated production of groundwater would remain the same between 2020 and 2040, however, the anticipated production of desalinated groundwater would increase by 3,100 acre -feet per year (AFY) between 2020 and 2040. In 2040, groundwater and desalinated groundwater would provide 11.4 percent of the District’s water supply.

Table WQ-1: Total Retail Water Supply (AFY)
Source 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2040
Percentage
Imported Water 56,397 81,197 89,097 100,497 111,597 122,097 61.7% Groundwater 15,252 12,303 12,303 12,303 12,303 12,303 6.3% Desalinated
Groundwater
7,288 7,000 10,100 10,100 10,100 10,100 5.1%
Recycled Water 44,150 45,245 48,334 50,017 51,800 53,300 26.9%

5 As of May 2021, EMWD’s 2020 UWMP has not been adopted. □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 63 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Total Retail Supply 123,087 145,745 159,834 172,917 185,800 197,800 100% Source: 2015 UWMP

As detailed in Section 19, Utilities and Service Systems , the supply of water listed in Table WQ- 1 would be sufficient during both normal years and multiple dry year conditions between 2020 and 2040 to meet all of the City’s estimated needs, including the proposed project. Therefore, the project would not result in changes to the projected groundwater pumping that would decrease groundwater supplies. Thus, impacts related to groundwater supplies would be less than significant.

Based on low soil infiltration test results at the project site, onsite bioretention basins are proposed as the preferred method for treating onsite flows. After completion of project construction, the project would convey stormwater drainage into landscaped areas and the two onsite water quality bioretention basins, which would route runoff to a new 24- inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle that connect s to RCFC Storm Drain Line F -4 in Cactus Avenue . The project would result in a net incremental increase of 0.49 cubic feet per second of flow to the storm drain in Cactus Avenue; however, the storm drain would be able to accommodate this increase without impact nor would offsite properties be impacted (Hydrology 2021). Therefore, impacts related to interference with groundwater recharge would be less than significant.

c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Response:

Less than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction of the project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen sediment and could result in erosion or siltation. However, the project site does not include any slopes, which reduces the erosion potential and the large majority of soil disturbance would be related to excavation and backfill for installation of building foundations and underground utilities.

The NPDES Construction General Permit requires preparation and implementation of a SWPPP by a Qualified SWPPP Developer for the proposed construction activities (included as PPP WQ -1). The SWPPP is required to address site- specific conditions related to potential sources of sedimentation and erosion and would list the required BMPs that are necessary to reduce or eliminate the potential of erosion or alteration of a drainage pattern during construction activities.

In addition, a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) is required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP through regular monitoring and visual inspections during construction activities. The SWPPP would be amended and BMPs revised, as determined necessary through field inspections, in order to protect against substantial soil erosion, the loss of topsoil, or alteration of the drainage pattern. Compliance with the Construction General Permit and a SWPPP prepared by a QSD and implemented by a QSP (per PPP WQ-1) would prevent construction-related impacts related to potential alteration of a drainage pattern or erosion from development activities. With implementation of the existing construction regulations that would be verified by the City during the permitting approval process, impacts related to alteration of an existing drainage pattern during construction that could result in substantial erosion, siltation, and increases in stormwater runoff would be less than significant.

Operation
After completion of project construction, impervious area would increase on the project site. However, the impervious areas would not be subject to erosion and the pervious areas would be landscaped with groundcovers that would inhibit erosion.

As discussed previously, in the existing condition, site drainage sheet flows across the property to the west towards Bradshaw Circle. A portion of the site’s drainage, identified as Area 1, flows southerly to Cactus Avenue where it is collected by a series of catch basins within Cactus Avenue, and is ultimately placed into an offsite storm drain. Onsite

I I I I I I I
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 64 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
drainage flows within Area 2 flow offsite towards Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue, where the flows are collected by a series of existing catch basins along Cactus Avenue (Hydrology 2021).

Additionally, the MS4 permit requires new development projects to prepare a WQMP (included as PPP WQ -2) that is required to include BMPs to reduce the potential of erosion and/or sedimentation through site design and structural treatment control BMPs. A Preliminary WQMP has been completed and included as Appendix H. As part of the permitting approval process, the proposed drainage and water quality design and engineering plans would be reviewed by the City’s Engineering Division to ensure that the site- specific design limits the potential for erosion and siltation. Overall, the proposed drainage system and adher
ence to the existing regulations would ensure that project impacts related to alteration of a drainage pattern and erosion/siltation from operational activities would be less than significant.

ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

The project site does not include, and is not adjacent to, a stream or river. Implementation of the project would not alter the course of a stream or river.

Construction
Construction of the project would require grading and excavation of soils. These activities could temporarily alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and change runoff flow rates. However, as described previously, implementation of the project requires a SWPPP (included as PPP WQ -1) that would address site specific drainage issues related to construction of the project and include BMPs to eliminate the potential of flooding or alteration of a drainage pattern during construction activities. This includes regular monitoring and visual inspections during construction activities. Compliance with the Construction General Permit and a SWPPP prepared by a QSD and implemented by a QSP (per PPP WQ-1) as verified by the City through the construction permitting process would prevent construction -related impacts related to potential alteration of a drainage pattern or flooding on or off -site from development activities. Therefore, construction impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
As described previously, the proposed project would result in an increase of impervious surfaces that would result in an increase of stormflows. The project would maintain the existing drainage pattern and convey runoff to bioretention basins which connect to a new 24- inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle , which then connects to the existing RCFC Storm Drain Line F -4 in Cactus Avenue. The project would result in a net incremental increase of 0.49 cubic feet per second of flow to the storm drain in Cactus Avenue; however, the storm drain would be able to accommodate this increase without impact nor would offsite properties be impacted. (Hydrology 2021) Moreover, as part of the permitting approval process, the proposed preliminary drainage design and engineering plans would be reviewed by the City’s Engineering Division to ensure that the proposed drainage would accommodate the appropriate design flows. Overall, the proposed drainage system and adherence to the existing MS4 permit regulations would ensure that project impacts related to alteration of a drainage pattern or flooding from operational activities would be less than significant.

iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

As described previously, the project site does not include, and is not adjacent to, a stream or river. Implementation of the project would not alter the course of a stream or river. □ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 65 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

Construction
As described in the previous response, construction of the proposed project would require grading and excavation activities that could temporarily alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and could result in increased runoff and polluted runoff if drainage is not properly controlled. However, implementation of the project requires a SWPPP (included as PPP WQ-1) that would address site specific pollutant and drainage issues related to construction of the project and include BMPs to eliminate the potential of polluted runoff and increased runoff during construction activities. This includes regular monitoring and visual inspections during construction activities. Compliance with the Construction General Permit and a SWPPP prepared by a QSD and implement ed by a QSP (per PPP WQ -1) as verified by the City through the construction permitting process would prevent construction- related impacts related to increases in run- off and pollution from development activities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
As described previously, the proposed project would result in an increase of impervious surfaces that would generate increased runoff. However, the project would manage the increased flow with bioretention basins that route runoff to a new 24-inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle which then connects to the existing RCFC Storm Drain Line F-4 on Cactus Avenue. The project would result in a net incremental increase of 0.49 cubic feet per second of flow to the storm drain in Cactus Avenue; however, the storm drain would be able to accommodate this increase without impact nor would offsite properties be impacted. (Hydrology 2021)

Moreover, as part of the permitting approval process, the proposed preliminary drainage design and engineering plans would be reviewed by the City’s Engineering Division to ensure that the proposed drainage would accommodate the appropriate design flows. The proposed project would increase the impervious surface area on the project site compared to the existing condition, and the proposed project would convey and treat all potential stormwater runoff from the project site. Therefore, the project would not create or contribute additional runoff water to the downstream storm drain system that would exceed the storm drain system’s capacity, and impacts would be less than significant.

iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map 06065C0770G, the project site is designated as zone X, meaning it is in an area of minimal flood hazard (FEMA 2020). As detailed in the previous responses, implementation of the project would result in an increase of impermeable surfaces on the site. The project would maintain the existing drainage pattern, and drainage would be conveyed to onsite bioretention basins that would route runoff to a new 24-inch diameter storm drain in Bradshaw Circle which would connect to the existing RCFC Storm Drain Line F -4 in Cactus Avenue. The project would result in a net incremental increase of 0.49 cubic feet per second of flow to the storm drain in Cactus Avenue; however, the storm drain would be able to accommodate this increase without impact nor would offsite properties be imp acted. (Hydrology 2021). Therefore, the project would not result in impeding or redirecting flood flows by the addition of the impervious surfaces. As detailed previously, the City’s permitting process would ensure that the drainage system specifications a dhere to the existing MS4 permit regulations, and compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts would be less than significant.

d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Response:

No Impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map 06065C0770G, the project site not within a flood zone (FEMA 2020). Thus, the project site is not located within a flood hazard area that could be inundated with flood flows and result in release of pollutants. Impacts related to flood hazards and pollutants would not occur from the project.

Tsunamis are generated ocean wave trains generally caused by tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with shallow earthquakes, sea floor landslides, rock falls, and exploding volcanic islands. The proposed project is
approximately 43 miles from the ocean shoreline. Based on the distance of the project site to the Pacific Ocean, the □ □ ~ □
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 66 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
project site is not at risk of inundation from tsunami. Therefore, the proposed project would not risk release of pollutants from inundation from a tsunami. No impact would occur.

Seiching is a phenomenon that occurs when seismic ground shaking induces standing waves (seiches) inside water retention facilities (e.g., reservoirs and lakes). Such waves can cause retention structures to fail and flood downstream properties. The project site is not located adjacent to any water retention facilities. For this reason, the project site is not at risk of inundation from seiche waves. Therefore, the proposed project would not risk release of pollutants from inundation from seiche. No impact would occur.

e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. As described previously, use of BMPs during construction implemented as part of a SWPPP as required by the NPDES Construction General Permit and PPP WQ- 1 would serve to ensure that project impacts related to construction activities resulting in a degradation of water quality would be less than significant. Thus, construction of the project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan.

Also, as described previously, new development projects are required to implement a WQMP (per PPP WQ-2) that would comply with the Santa Ana RWQCB MS4 Permit regulations. The WQMP and applicable BMPs are verified as part of the City’s permitting approval process, and construction plans would be required to demonstrate compliance with these regulations. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not conflict of obstruct with a water quality control plan.

In addition, as detailed previously, the EMWD manages basin water supply and the anticipated production of groundwater would remain steady from 2025 through 2040 (as shown in Table WQ-1). As described previously and further detailed in Section 19, Utilities and Service Systems, the City’s supply of water listed in Table WQ-1 would be sufficient during both normal years and multiple dry year conditions between 2020 and 2040 to meet all of the City’s estimated needs, including the proposed project. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the groundwater management plan and would not conflict with or obstruct its implementation. Thus, impacts related to water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP WQ-1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to grading permit issuance, the project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 8.10 and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other NPDES regulations to limit the potential of erosion and polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by the City of Moreno Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

PPP WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan, Prior to grading permit issuance, the project applicant shall have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) approved by the City for implementation. The project shall comply with the City’s Municipal Chapter 8.10 and the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements in effect for the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) at the time of grading permit to control discharges of sediments and other pollutants during operations of the project.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.7 – Water Quality - Figure 5-4 – Flood Hazards
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.5 – Water Resources □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 67 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
- Figure 6-1 Water Purveyor Service Area Map

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.5 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
- Figure 4.5-2 – Floodplains and High Fire Hazard Areas • Section 5.7 – Hydrology and Water Quality
- Figure 4.7-1 – Storm Water Flows and Major Drainage Facilities - Figure 4.7-2 – Groundwater Basins

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.080 – Liquid and Solid Waste

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 – Flood Damage Prevention

5. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.21 – Grading Regulations

6. Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Groundwater Reliability Plus, http://gwrplus.org/

7. Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) 2015 Urban Water Management Plan

8. Preliminary Hydrology Report. April 15, 2020; Revised May 21, 2021. Prepared by Robert M. Beers (Appendix G).

9. Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan. June 2020. Prepared by Adkan Engineers (Appendix H).

10. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. 2021. Available at: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search (Accessed May 26, 2021).

XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project:

a) Physically divide an established community?
Response:

No Impact. The project site is currently vacant and is surrounded by a roadway to the south followed by single- family residences; single-family residences to the north; vacant land to the east; and single- family residences and commercial uses to the west. The proposed project would redevelop the site to provide 37 single-family residential units, which are consistent with the existing single- family residences to the north, west, and south of the site. Therefore, the change of the project site from a vacant site to single -family residential would not physically divide an established community. In addition, the project would not change roadways or install any infrastructure that would result in a physical division. Thus, the proposed project would not result in impacts related to physical division of an established community.

b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. As described previously, the project site is currently vacant. The project would redevelop the project site to provide 37 new single-family residences, which would be similar to the single- family residential uses that are located adjacent to the west of the site, to the south of the site beyond Cactus Avenue, and to the north of the site.

General Plan
The project site currently has a General Plan land use designation of has a land use designation of Residential: Max. 5 du/ac (R5), which does not have the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the site to Low Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10), which would allow the proposed single-family residences at a density of 10 units per gross acre. The General Plan Land Use Element states that the Residential: Max. 10 du/ac (R10) designation allows for allows for development of residential uses to a maximum density of 10 dwelling units per acre. As the project would develop residences at a density of 7.9 units per gross acre, it would be consistent with the proposed land use designation, and the proposed change in land use would be less than significant.

Zoning
□ □ □ L8J
□ □ L8J □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 68 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The project site is currently zoned Residential 5 District (R5). The primary purpose of the R5 district is to provide for residential development on common sized suburban lots. This district is intended as an area for development of single - family residential and mobile home subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of five DUs per net acre, as indicated in Section 9.03.020 of the Municipal Code. implement the proposed single- family residential uses. As described previously, the project would develop single-family residences at a density of 7.9 units per gross acre and would require a zone change to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District . In addition, the project is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows for a development to establish unique criteria for such things as setbacks, lot width and depth, building separation, lot size, etc. This is allowed in exchange for a higher level of detail and amenities within the project than typically required for standard residential development. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable zoning regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.1 – Land Use - Figure 1-1 – Neighboring Lands Uses
- Figure 1-2 – Land Use Map
• Chapter 8 – 2014 – 2021 Housing Element

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?

Response:

No Impact. The project site is located in Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3), according to the Mineral Land Classification Map provided by the California Department of Conservation. The MRZ -3 zone within the Significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Area (SMARA) Study Area is defined as areas containing mineral deposits which the significance cannot be evaluated from available data.

The City’s General Plan EIR states that no locally, regionally, or statewide significant mineral resources are located within the City. Therefore, development of the site would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region, and impacts would not occur.

b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?

Response:

No Impact. As described in the previous response, the City’s General Plan EIR states that no locally, regionally, or statewide significant mineral resources are located within the City. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in the loss of locally important mineral resources, and impacts would not occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
□ □ □ ~
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 69 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.9 – Mineral Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.14 – Mineral Resources

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.02.120 – Surface Mining Permits

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 8.21.020 A 7 – Permits Required

5. The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA, Public Resources Code, Sections 2710- 2796), https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dmr/lawsandregulations

6. California Department of Conservation. 2020. Mineral Land Classification. Accessed:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc (Accessed May 26, 2021).

XIII. NOISE – Would the project result in:

City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code
Sound level limits: Chapter 11.80.03 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes maximum noise levels permitted within the city, which are listed in Table N-1:

Table N-1: City of Moreno Valley Maximum Continuous Sound Levels Duration per Day
(Continuous Hours) Sound Level [dBA]
8 90
6 92
4 95
3 97
2 100

1.5 102
1 105
.5 110
.25 115
Source: City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code

Sensitive Receptor Noise Levels: Chapter 11.80.30 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes the permissible noise level that may be received at nearby sensitive uses (e.g., residential). For noise-sensitive residential properties 200 feet from the source, the exterior noise level shall not exceed 60 dBA during daytime hours (8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and shall not exceed 55 dBA during the nighttime hours (10:01 p.m. to 7:59 a.m.) (Municipal Code, Chapter 11.80).

Construction Noise: Section 8.14.082.E of the City’s Municipal Code also provides construction noise standards, which state that Any construction within the city shall only be completed between the hour of seven a.m. to eight p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, unless written approval is obtained from the city building official or city engineer.

Sensitive Receptors
The nearest existing sensitive receptors to the project site are the single -family homes located approximately 20 feet north of the project site. There are also single-family homes located approximately 75 feet to the west of the project site.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 70 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The nearest school to the project site is Ridge Crest Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.3 miles southeast of the project site.

Existing Ambient Noise Levels
To identify the existing ambient noise levels in the project area, noise level measurements were taken on and adjacent to the project site on March 20, 2020. As shown on Table N -2, the average noise levels in the project area range from

58.8 dBA to 88.8 dBA. Table N-2 also shows that the both the daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearby sensitive receptors currently exceeds the City’s residential noise standards of 60 dBA Leq during the daytime and 55 dBA Leq during the nighttime.

Table N-2: Existing Ambient Noise Level Measurements
Site
No.

Site Description Average (dBA Leq) 1-hr Average (dBA
Leq/Time)
Average
(dBA
CNEL)
Daytime Nighttime Minimum Maximum
A Located on a fence near the southwest corner of the
project site, approximately 70 feet north of the Cactus Avenue centerline.

58.8 81.7

47.0 3:02 a.m.

62.2 3:55 p.m.

62.4 B Located on a fence near the southeast corner of the project site, approximately 50 feet north of the Cactus Avenue centerline.

62.3 88.8

47.8 3:37 a.m.

66.8 3:54 p.m.

64.9 Source: NOI 2020

a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include site preparation and grading of the project site, construction of the 37 single-family residences, paving of the onsite driveways and parking areas, and application of architectural coatings. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the single-family residences located approximately 20 feet north of the project site.

Table N-3 shows that the highest noise from construction would occur during the site preparation and grading phases when noise levels are anticipated to reach 80 dBA Leq at the nearest sensitive receptors (residences), which is below the City’s 8‐hour noise threshold of 90 dBA (Municipal Code Chapter 11.80.03). In addition, the project would comply with the allowable construction times pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code, the construction‐ related noise levels would not exceed any standards. Therefore, construction noise impacts would be less than significant.

Table N-3: Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptor Construction Phase Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq) at:
□ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 71 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Nearest Homes to
the North1
Nearest Homes to
the West2
Nearest Homes to
the South3
Site Preparation 81 77 71
Grading 81 78 71
Building Construction 74 75 68
Paving 69 76 65
Painting 71 69 60
City’s Noise Threshold4 90 90 90
Exceed Thresholds? No No No
1 The nearest home is located as near as 20 feet north of the project site. In order to account for the existing 6-foot high wall on the north property line, 5 dB of shielding was added to the RCNM Model. 2 The nearest home is located as near as 75 feet west of the project site. 3 The nearest home is located as near as 100 feet south of the project site. In order to account for the existing sound wall on the south side of Cactus Avenue, 5 dB of shielding was added to the RCNM Model. 4 City Noise Threshold obtained from Section 11.80.030(B) of the Municipal Code.

Source: NOI 2020

Operation
Development of the proposed project would generate approximately 28 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 38 trips during the p.m. peak hour, for a total of 359 daily trips .6 The noise generated from these vehicular trips has been identified through a comparison of noise generated by traffic volumes with and without the project, provided in Table N-3.

Table N-4: Project Traffic Noise Contributions
dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1
Increase
Threshold2 Roadway Segment Existing
Existing Plus
Project
Project
Contribution
Cactus Avenue East of Moreno Beach Drive 61.7 62.1 0.4 +2 dBA Source: NOI 2020
Objective 6.5 of the City’s General Plan Noise Element requires the City to minimize noise impacts from significant noise generators including roadway noise impacts. However, neither the General Plan nor the CEQA Guidelines define what constitutes a “substantial permanent increase to ambient noise levels.” Therefore, thresholds from the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018) have been utilized, which identifies noise impacts by comparing the existing noise levels and the future noise levels with the proposed project. Based on the FTA guidance, a substantial increase in ambient noise from vehicular traffic could occur when the noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses (e.g. residential, etc.) are less than 60 dBA CNEL and the project creates an increase of 3 dBA CNEL or greater noise level increase; or when noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA CNEL and the project creates 2 dBA CNEL or greater noise level increase.

As shown in Table N-4 above, the project traffic would result in a maximum increase of 0.4 dBA, which is below the noise increase thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to operational noise would be less than significant.

Roadway Noise to Interior of Proposed Homes
The exterior noise level at the façade of the first and second floors were calculated based on using the Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Prediction Model. As shown on Table N -5, with a “windows open” condition where the proposed homes to not have HVAC to provide cooling, the interior noise levels of the lots fronting Cactus Avenue would be above the City’s dBA CNEL residential interior noise standard.

6 It should be noted the traffic and noise analyses analyzed 38 dwelling units based on an earlier iteration of the project’s site plan. As the project proposes 37 dwelling units, the project-generated trip generation calculated in the traffic analysis, which are incorporated into the noise analysis are therefore highly conservative as well as the calculated operational noise results of noise analysis.

I I I I I I I
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 72 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Table N-5: Proposed Homes Interior Noise Levels from Cactus Avenue Lot
Number Roadway Floor
Exterior Noise Level at Building
Façade (dBA CNEL)
Interior Noise Levels (dBA CNEL)
Windows Open
Unmitigated1
Windows
Closed
Mitigated2
1 Cactus Avenue 1 60 48 35
2 68 56 43
3 Cactus Avenue 1 61 49 36
2 68 56 43
5 Cactus Avenue 1 60 48 35
2 68 56 43
Notes:
1 Unmitigated Interior noise levels based on 12 dBA of noise reduction. 2 Mitigated Interior noise levels based on 25 dBA of noise reduction with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1.

FHWA RD-77-108 Model.

Source: NOI 2020
As such, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is included to require installation of forced air conditioning and heating to achieve a “windows closed” condition. As shown in Table N -5, with implementation of MM NOI -1, interior noise levels would be below the City’s interior noise standard. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, impacts related to operational noise would be less than significant.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction activities associated with the proposed project would require the operation of off-road equipment and trucks that are known sources of vibration. Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment used on the site. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Vibrations at buildings could produce results that range from no perceptible effects at the low levels to damage at the highest levels. It should be noted that vibration is much more discernible in a siting or laying down position, which typically only occur inside a home. As such, this analysis is based on the vibration levels at the nearest homes, instead of the nearest residential property lines.

Chapter 9.10 of the Municipal Code includes performance standards for proposed development projects that may impact the surrounding neighborhood and Section 9.10.030(B), which is part of this Chapter, exempts t emporary construction activities from Section 9.10.170 that restricts the creation of vibration that can be felt at the property line, provided that construction activities occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.. Since the City’s Municipal does not provide a quantifiable vibration level for construction activities, Caltrans guidance has been utilized, which defines the threshold of perception from transient sources at 0.25 inch per second PPV. Table N-6 shows the typical PPV and average vibration levels shown in vibration velocity in decibels (VdB) that are produced from some common construction equipment that would likely be utilized during construction of the proposed project (NOI 2020).

Table N-5: Typical Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity
(inches/second)
Approximate Vibration
Level
(Lv) at 25 feet
Pile driver (impact) 1.518 (upper range)

0.644 (typical)
112
104
Pile driver (sonic) 0.734 (upper range)

0.170 (typical)
105
93 Clam shovel drop (slurry
wall) 0.202 94
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 73 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Vibratory Roller 0.210 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large bulldozer 0.089 87
Caisson drill 0.089 87
Loaded trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: NOI 2020
From the list of equipment shown in Table N -6, the primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. A large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 87 VdB, which is equivalent to 0.089 inch per second rms at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest homes (20 feet away from proposed construction activities) would be approximately 0.11 inch per second rms. The vibration level at the nearest offsite home is within the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant from construction of the proposed project.

Operation
Operation of the proposed single- family uses would include heavy trucks for residents moving in and out of the residences, large deliveries, and garbage trucks for solid waste disposal. Truck vibration levels are dependent on vehicle characteristics, load, speed, and pavement conditions. However, typical vibration levels for the heavy truck activity at normal traffic speeds would be approximately 0.006 in/sec PPV, based on the FTA Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment. Truck movements on site would be travelling at very low speed, so it is expected that truck vibration at nearby sensitive receivers would be less than the vibration threshold of 0.08 in/sec PPV for fragile historic buildings and

0.04 in/sec PPV for human annoyance, and therefore, would be less than significant.

c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft. The nearest airport is March Air Reserve Base that is located approximately 5.2 miles west of the project site. The project site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of the March Air Reserve Base (RCALUC). Thus, impacts would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.4 – Noise
- Figure 5-2 – Buildout Noise Contours

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.4 – Noise
- Figure 4.4-1 – March Air Reserve Base Noise Impact Area - Figure 4.4-2 – Buildout Noise Contours – Alternative 1 - Figure 4.4-3 -- Buildout Noise Contours – Alternative 2 - Fi gure 4.4-4 -- Buildout Noise Contours – Alternative 3 • Appendix D – Noise Analysis, Wieland Associates, Inc., June 2003. □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 74 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.140 Noise and Sound

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 11.80 Noise Regulations

5. March Air Reserve Base (MARB)/March Inland Port (MIP) Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) on November 13, 2014, ( http://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/17%20- %20Vol.%201%20March%20Air%20Reserve%20Base%20Final.pdf?ver=2016-08-15-145812-700)

6. Noise Impact Analysis, Tentative Tract Map No. 37858, City of Moreno Valley. December 31, 2020. Prepared by Vista Environmental (Appendix I).

XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project would construct 37 single-family residences on the project site. According to data from the California Department of Finance (CDF) published in May 2021, the City of Moreno Valley has a residential population of 209,426 persons and 57,725. Of these, 46,551 (approximately 81 percent) are single-family detached units.

In addition, it is estimated that the City has an average of 3.86 persons per household.

Based on this information, the proposed project would result in a net increase of approximately 14 3 new residents.

Therefore, the project would represent a population increase of approximately 0.07 percent and a 0.06 percent increase in residential units within the City. This limited level of growth on a site that has been previously developed would not constitute substantial growth.

The proposed project is located in an urbanized residential area of the City and is surrounded by residential and commercial uses and is already served by the existing roadways and infrastructure systems. No infrastructure would be extended or constructed to serve areas beyond the project site, which could reduce further population growth, and indirect impacts related to growth would not occur from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, potential impacts related to inducement of unplanned population growth, either directly or indirectly, would be less than significant.

b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?

Response:

No Impact. As described above, the project site is vacant and undeveloped land and does not contain any housing or people on the project site. The proposed project would construct 37 new single-family residences and would not displace any existing housing or people and would not necessitate the construction of housing elsewhere. Thus, impacts would not occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.12 – Population and Housing
- Attachments #1 - #10 – Housing Sites Inventory
□ □ ~ □
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 75 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
- Exhibits A1 – A11, C, D, and E – Maps of Housing Sites

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. California Department of Finance. May 2021. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011- 2021 with 2010 Census Benchmark. Accessed:
http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/ (Accessed May 26, 2021).

XV. PUBLIC SERVICES – Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Moreno Valley Fire Department provides fire protection to the project area.

The City’s Fire Department is the primary response agency to fires, emergency medical service, hazardous materials incidents, traffic accidents, terrorist acts, catastrophic weather events, and technical rescues. Additionally, the City’s Office of Emergency Management is located within the Fire Department allowing for a well-coordinated response to both natural and man-made disasters. The Moreno Valley Fire Department (MVFD) is part of the CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department’s regional, integrated, cooperative fire protection organization, which provides access to other regional fire and emergency equipment and/or services, as needed.

There are two existing fire stations within two miles of the project site. Fire Station 58 is located 2.4 miles from the project site at 28040 Eucalyptus Avenue. This fire station is a three- bay facility that can house two engine companies, a truck company, and additional resources as needed. This fire station currently houses one paramedic engine company and a type 3 fire engine. Fire Station 99 is 2.8 miles from the project site at 13400 Morrison Street. This fire station is a two-bay facility that houses one paramedic engine company (MVFD 2020).

The proposed project could potentially increase the demand for MVFD services due to the construction of the new residential units. As discussed in previously, the project would generate approximately 143 new residents.

The project would develop 37 single-family residences in an area already served by the City’s Fire Department and within close proximity to two existing fire stations. The project would be adequately served by the two fire stations that currently serve the project area. Additionally, the project would be required to adhere to the California Fire Code (included in the City’s Municipal Code Chapters 8.36) and would be reviewed by the Fire Department during the project permitting process to ensure that the project plans meet the fire protection requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Additionally, the Developer would be required to pay development fees (including permit and inspection fees) that would be applied to the City’s public services including fire protection services.

ii) Police protection?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Moreno Valley receives policing services through a contract for services with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office. The City’s police station is located at 22850 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, which is approximately 5.7 miles from the project site. Because the project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, implementation of the project would result in an onsite population that would create the need for police services. Calls for police service during project construction may include: theft of building materials and construction equipment, malicious mischief, graffiti, and vandalism. Operation of the project could generate a typical range of police service calls, such as burglaries, thefts, and disturbances. To reduce the potential for these types of crimes, security concerns are addressed in the project design by providing low- intensity security lighting for the purposes of wayfinding, safety, and building structure security.

□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 76 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Although an incremental increase could result from implementation of the project, the need for law enforcement services from the proposed project would be limited and within an area that is currently served. Thus, the need for policing services generated by the project would not require the construction or expansion of police department facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, the Developer would be required to pay development fees (including permit and inspection fees) that would be applied to the City’s public services including police protection services.

iii) Schools?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is located within the Moreno Valley Unified School District, which operates and maintains 43 schools, including 23 elementary schools (K‐5), 6 middle schools (7‐8), 5 high schools (9‐12), and 9 specialized schools. The site is currently located within the attendance area boundaries of Ridgecrest Elementary School, Mountain View Middle School, and Valley View High School.

The project would develop 37 single-family residences. The Moreno Valley Unified School District’s April 2020 Developer Fee Justification Report indicates that there are over 53,581 residential dwelling units existing within the District. It is anticipated that a total of 13,156 additional units will be constructed by 2040. Based on the District’s Student Generation Rate of 0.6041, this will generate over 7,947 additional K-12 students during that period (MVUSD 2020). With the Student Generation Rate of 0.6041, the project will generate approximately 23 additional K-12 students upon implementation.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 et seq., the need for additional school facilities is addressed through compliance with school impact fee assessment. SB 50 (Chapter 407 of Statutes of 1998) sets forth a state school facilities construction program that includes restrictions on a local jurisdiction’s ability to condition a project on mitigation of a project’s impacts on school facilities in excess of fees set forth in the Government Code. These fees are collected by school districts at the time of issuance of building permits for development projects. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 applicants shall pay developer fees (included as PPP PS-1) to the appropriate school districts at the time building permits are issued; and payment of the adopted fees provides full and complete mitigation of school impacts. As a result, impacts related to school facilities would be less than significant with the Government Code required fee payments.
iv) Parks?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. Based on Map 3.1, Existing Parks and Community Facilities, in the City of Moreno Valley Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, the City operates and maintains six parks within the project’s vicinity: Rock Ridge Park, approximately 2.9 miles to the northwest; Morrison Park, approximately 2.9 miles to the northwest; Ridgecrest Park, approximately 1.6 miles to the southeast; Weston Park, approximately 3.6 miles to the northwest; the Moreno Valley Community Park, approximately 6.4 miles to the west; and Celebration Park, approximately

1.2 miles to the southwest.

The project includes the construction of 37 single-family residences, including 11,443 SF at the recreation – open space lot, which would provide park facilities for the new residents. In addition, Section 3.38.080 and Chapter 3.40 of the City’s Municipal Code include requirements for mitigation fees in favor of park improvements and/or parkland dedication; where applicable, these fees would be included as a condition of the approval of the residential development (included as PPP PS-2). These fees would be used in the City of the purpose of acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining, to the extent permitted by law, park improvements provided for in the City’s General Plan and its adopted capital improvement program or an adopted master plan of parks and recreation facilities, as amended from time to time.

Therefore, as the project w ould provide sufficient onsite open space for its residents , impacts related to the need to provide new or altered park and recreation facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios would be less than significant. Additionally, the developer would be required to pay park fees described above. v) Other public facilities?
Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would develop 37 single-family residential units within an area that already contains single-family residential. The additional residences would result in a limited incremental increase in the need for additional services, such as public libraries and post offices, etc. Because the project area is already served by □ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 77 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
other services and the project would result in a limited increase in residences, the project would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to provide other services, the construction of w hich could cause significant environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP PS-1: The project will be required to pay applicable development fees levied by the Moreno Valley Unified School District pursuant to the School Facilities Act (Senate Bill [SB] 50, Stats. 1998, c.827) to offset any effects on school facilities resulting from new development.

PPP PS-2: Park Fees. As a condition of the approval of a residential development, the project shall pay applicable park related fees and/or dedicate parkland pursuant to Municipal Code Section 3.38.080 and Chapter 3.40.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.5 – Schools - Figure 1-3 – School District Boundaries
• Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.6 – Library Services • Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.7 – Special Districts • Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.5 – Other City Facilities • Chapter 4 – Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element – Section 4.3 – Parks and Recreation - Figure 3-2 – Future Parklands Acquisition Areas
- Figure 3-3 – Master Plan of Trails
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.1 – Police Protection and Crime Preventions • Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.2 – Fire and Emergency Services - Figure 5-1 – Fire Stations

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.13 – Public Services
- Figure 4.13-1 – Location of Public Facilities

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. City of Moreno Valley Fire Department Website. Accessed: http://www.moreno- valley.ca.us/city_hall/departments/fire/index-fire.shtml (Accessed May 11, 2020).

5. City of Moreno Valley Police Department Website. Accessed: http://www.moreno - valley.ca.us/city_hall/departments/police/index-police.shtml (Accessed May 11, 2020).

6. City of Moreno Valley Parks, Recreational, and Open Spaces Comprehensive Master Plan. Accessed:

7. http://www.ci.moreno-valley.ca.us/resident_services/park_rec/pdfs/park-mp0910.pdf (Accessed May 11, 2020).

8. Moreno Valley Unified School District Fee Justification Report for New Residential and Commercial/Industrial Development. 2020.

XVI. RECREATION – Would the project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. As described previously project would develop 37 single-family residences. As discussed previously, residential developments are subject to Section 3.38.080 and Chapter 3.40 of the City’s Municipal Code, which include requirements for mitigation fees in fa vor of park improvements and/or parkland dedication; where applicable, these fees would be included as a condition of the approval of the residential development (included as PPP PS-2). These fees would be used in the City of the purpose of acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining, to the extent permitted by law, park improvements provided for in the City’s General Plan and its adopted □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 78 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
capital improvement program or an adopted master plan of parks and recreation facilities, as amended from time to time.

Therefore, as the project would provide sufficient onsite open space for its residents, impacts related to the increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities, such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated would be less than significant. Additionally, the developer would be required to pay park fees described above.

b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. As described above, while the project would contribute park development fees pursuant to Municipal Code 3.38.080 (included as PPP PS-2) to be used towards the future expansion or maintenance parks and recreational facilities, these fees are standard with every residential development, and the proposed project would not require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The project includes 11,443 SF of recreation – open space for residents and the impact of this recreational feature is included as part of the overall project analysis contained in this Initial Study . Therefore, impacts specific to recreation would be less than significant. Additionally, the developer would be required to pay park fees described above.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP PS-2: Park Fees, provided in Section 15, Public Services.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 4 – Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element – Section 4.3 – Parks and Recreation - Figure 3-1 Open Space
- Figure 3-2 – Future Parklands Acquisition Areas
- Figure 3-3 – Master Plan of Trails

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.13 – Public Services
- Figure 4.13-1 – Location of Public Facilities

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

XVII. TRANSPORTATION – Would the project:
a) Conflict with program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction activities associated with the project would generate vehicular trips from construction workers traveling to and from project site, delivery of construction supplies and import materials to, and export of debris from, the project site.

However, these activities would only occur for a period of 12 months. The increase of trips during construction activities would be limited and are not anticipated to exceed the number of operational trips described below. The short -term vehicle trips from construction of the project would generate less than significant traffic related impacts.

□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 79 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Operation
As shown in Table T-1 below, the proposed project would generate approximately 30 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 40 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and a total of 378 daily trips.78

Table T-1: Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
Single-Family
Detached
Housing1
DU 9.440 0.185 0.555 0.740 0.624 0.366 0.990
Project Trip Generation
Detached
Single Family
38 DUa 359 7 21 28 24 14 38
Notes:
a As noted, the traffic analysis analyzed 38 dwelling units, which results in a more conservative analysis as the project proposes 37 dwelling units.

DU = Dwelling Units
1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing.

2 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise).

Source: EPD 2020 (Appendix J)

According to Exhibit A of the City of Moreno Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide, projects that generate fewer than 100 vehicle trips during the peak hours are generally exempt from the requirement to prepare a traffic impact analysis. Operation of the project would not generate over 100 AM or PM peak hour trips. Therefore, the project would not result in a conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, and impacts would be less than significant.

The project area is currently served by the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA). The RTA provides both local and regional services throughout the region with 38 fixed routes, 9 commuter link routes, and Dial-A-Ride services. The existing RTA bus stop for Route 20, located approximately 0.3 miles from the project site on Moreno Beach Drive, is the closest existing route to the project. Operation of the project would not affect the operation of the bus route. Thus, no impacts would occur. In addition, both sidewalks and bicycle lanes are located adjacent to the project site on Cactus Avenue. The proposed project would not alter any of the existing bicycle or sidewalk facilities. Thus, impacts related to bicycle or pedestrian circulation would not occur from implementation of the project.

b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Response:

Less than Significant Impact. Section 15064.3 of the State CEQA Guidelines codifies that project related transportation impacts are typically best measured by evaluating the project’s vehicle miles travelled (VMT). Specifically, subdivision (b) focuses on specific criteria related to transportation analysis and is divided into four subdivisions: (1) land use projects, (2) transportation projects, (3), qualitative analysis, and (4) methodology. Subdivision (b)(1) provides guidance on

7 It should be noted the traffic analysis analyzed 38 dwelling units based on an earlier iteration of the project’s site plan. As the project proposes 37 dwelling units, the project’s trip generation and impacts calculated in the traffic analysis are therefore highly conservative. 8 It should be noted that the trip generation was modeled using trip rates from the ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 10 th Edition. A trip generation was run using trip rates from ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition, which found that utilizing the 10 th Edition results in more trips. Therefore, the project’s trip generation provides a conservative analysis.

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I
-
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 80 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
determining the significance of transportation impacts of land use projects using VMT; projects located within 0.5 mile of transit should be considered to have a less than significant impact. Subdivision (b)(2) addresses VMT associated with transportation projects and states that projects that reduce VMT, such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit projects, should be presumed to have a less than significant impact. Subdivision (b)(3) acknowledges that Lead Agencies may not be able to quantitatively estimate VMT for every project type; in these cases, a qualitative analysis may be used. Subdivision (b)(4) stipulates that Lead Agencies have the discretion to formulate a methodology that would appropriately analyze a project’s VMT.

The City of Moreno Valley has prepared updated Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (Guidelines) for Land Use Projects in June 2020 to address changes to CEQA pursuant to SB -743 to include VMT analysis methodology and thresholds.

The Moreno Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines provide several screening thresholds for determining if a V MT analysis is required. A project VMT analysis would not be required if a project is located in a Transit Priority Area (TPA) or a low VMT area, or if the project is a local serving retail project or other neighborhood use, including projects that generate fewer than 400 daily trips, which corresponds to a typical development of 42 single family housing units. As shown on Table T-1, the project proposes less than the 42 dwelling units discussed in the guidelines and generates 359 daily vehicle trips, fewer than the 400 daily vehicle trips threshold. Therefore, based on the Moreno Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, the project would be presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT.

c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The project includes development of single- family residences. The project includes community type uses and does not include any incompatible uses, such as farm equipment. The proposed project area would be accessed from Bradshaw Circle, as well as through the onsite streets to each residence.

The project would also not increase any hazards related to a design feature. All of the onsite streets would be developed in conformance with City design standards. The City’s construction permitting process includes review of project plans to ensure that no potentially hazardous transportation design features would be introduced by the project. For example, the design of the project streets would be reviewed to ensure fire engine accessibility and turn around area is provided to the fire code standards. As a result, impacts related to vehicular circulation design features would be less than significant.

d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Response:

Less than Significant Impact.

Construction
The proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would occur within and adjacent to the project area on Bradshaw Circle, and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the project site or adjacent areas. The installation of driveways and connections to existing infrastructure systems that would be implemented during construction of the proposed project could require the temporary closure of Bradshaw Circle and Cactus Avenue. Traffic detours are not expected to be necessary. In addition, the construction activities would be required to ensure emergency access in accordance with Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9), which would be ensured through the City’s permitting process. Thus, implementation of the project through the City’s permitting process would ensure existing regulations are adhered to and would reduce potential construction related emergency access impacts to a less than significant level.

Operation
As described previously, the proposed project area would be accessed from Bradshaw Circle, as well as through the onsite streets to each residence. Permitting of these roadways would provide adequate and safe circulation to, from, and through the project are and would provide two routes for emergency responders to access different portions of the project area. Because the project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, as verified by the City, potential impacts related to inadequate emergency access would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs or Policies
□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 81 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 5 Circulation Element
- Figure 8-1 – Circulation Plan
- Figure 8-2 – LOS Standards
- Figure 8-3 – Roadway Cross-Sections
- Figure 8-4 – Bikeway Plan

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.2 – Traffic/Circulation
- Figure 4.2-1 – Circulation Plan
- Figure 4.2-2 – General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections
- Figure 4.2-3 – Year 2000 Number of Through Lanes
- Figure 4.2-4 – Year 2000 Daily Volume/Capacity (V/C) Ratios - Figure 4.2-5 – Year 2000 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - Figure 4.2-6 – Proposed Circulation Plan
- Figure 4.2-7 – LOS Standards
• Appendix B – Traffic Analysis, City of Moreno Valley General Plan Traffic Study, Urban Crossroads, June 2004.

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 3.18 Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund

5. Moreno Valley Master Bike Plan, adopted January 2015

6. Riverside County Transportation Commission, Congestion Management Program, December 14, 2011

7. City of Moreno Valley Transportation Engineering Division, Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide. 2007.

8. Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis for Cactus and Bradshaw Circle Residential Project. December 30, 2020. Prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc. (Appendix I).

XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:

AB 52 and SB 18 Requirements
The project would be required to comply with AB 52 and SB 18 regarding tribal consultation. Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (i.e., AB 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a project’s potential to impact “tribal cultural res ources.” Such resources include sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register or included in a local register o f historical resources (PRC Section 21074). AB 52 also gives Lead Agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource falling outside the definition stated above nonetheless qualifies as a “tribal cultural resource.”

SB 18 requires cities and counties acting as Lead Agency to contact and consult with California Native American tribes before adopting or amending a General Plan. The intent of SB 18 is to establish meaningful consultation between tribal governments and local governments at the earliest possible point in the planning process and to enable tribes to manage “cultural places.” Cultural places are defined as a Native American sanctified cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine (PRC Section 5097.9), or a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register, including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, or any archaeological or historic site (PRC Section 5097.993).

In compliance with these requirements, the City sent out to the following Native American tribes that may have knowledge regarding tribal cultural resources in the project vicinity. • Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
• Cahuilla Band of Indians
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 82 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
• Desert Cahuilla Indians
• Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians
• Morongo Band of Mission Indians
• Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians
• Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians
• San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
• Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
• Serrano Nation of Mission Indians
• Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians

The Pechanga Band of Luise ño Indians requested consultation regarding the proposed project. The consulting tribe considers the area sensitive for cultural resources as several sites are located nearby. Although no information for site specific tribal cultural resources was provided, the consulting tribe requested the inclusion of mitigation due to the potential of the project to unearth previously undocumented tribal cultural resources during construction. As such, Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 are included, which require Native American monitoring, and procedures for artifact disposition and inadvertent finds. With implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR -1 through TCR-3, impacts would be less than significant.
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or

Response:

No Impact. As detailed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the project site is currently vacant. Historic aerial photographs and maps of the project site showed no development in the general vicinity of the project area until after 1976. All improvements, therefore, are less than 45 years of age and considered modern and of no historical consequence (McKenna 2020).

The Phase I Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview prepared for the project included a search of the California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), located at the University of California, Riverside, Riverside County. The records search indicated that the nearest recorded resources are more than one-half mile distant. It was also determined that there are no known significant cultural resources within the project area and any future development will not adversely impact any significant resources. Furthermore, the Sacred Lands File search completed by the NAHC stated that there are no known/known sacred lands within a 1 mile of the project site (McKenna 2020). Therefore, no substantial evidence exists that tribal cultural resources are present in the project site, and potential impacts would be less than significant.

ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As detailed previously, to avoid potential adverse effects to tribal cultural resources, Mitigation Measures CR- 1 through CR -6, above and Mitigation Measures TCR -1 through TCR-3 have been included to provide for Native American and archaeological monitoring of excavation and grading activities to avoid potential impacts to tribal cultural resources that may be unearthed by project construction activities.

No information has been provided to the Lead Agency indicating any likelihood of uncovering tribal cultural resources on the project site, there are no known tribal cultural resources on or adjacent to the project site, and no potentially significant □ □ □ ~
-
□ ~ □ □
-
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 83 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -6 and Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR -3 are included in the event of any inadvertent discoveries during construction activities.

Additionally, as described previously and included as Mitigation Measure CR-6 , California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in the project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.

Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL- 1 through CUL-6 and Mitigation Measures CUL- 1 through CUL-3, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Listed previously in Section 5, Cultural Resources.

Mitigation Measures

Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians for tribal monitoring. The City is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance notice to the tribes of all ground disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Native American Monitor(s) shall attend the pre - grading meeting with the Project Archaeologist, City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Cultural Resource Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure CR-2. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in Mitigation Measure TCR -1 The location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file with the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

TCR-3: Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.2 – Cultural and Historical Resources

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.10 – Cultural Resources
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 84 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
- Figure 4.10-1 – Locations of Listed Historic Resource Inventory Structures - Figure 4.10-2 – Location of Prehistoric Sites
- Figure 4.10-3 – Paleontological Resource Sensitive Areas • Appendix F – Cultural Resources Analysis, Study of Historical and Archaeological Resources for the Revised General Plan, City of Moreno Valley, Archaeological Associates, August 2003.

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Title 7 – Cultural Preservation

5. Cultural Resources Inventory for the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California, prepared by Daniel F.

XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?

Response:

Less than Significant.

Water Infrastructure
The proposed project would install a new 8-inch water pipeline in Bradshaw Circle that would connect to an existing 12- inch water pipeline in Cactus Avenue. The new onsite water system would convey water supplies to the proposed residences and landscaping through plumbing/landscaping fixtures that are compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code for efficient use of water.

The proposed project would continue to receive water supplies through the existing water line located within the Cactus Avenue rights-of-way that has the capacity to provide the increased water supplies needed to serve the proposed project, and no extensions or expansions to the water pipelines that convey water to the project site would be required. The installation of onsite water distribution lines would only serve the proposed project and would not provide water to any off-site areas.

The construction activities related to the onsite water infrastructure that would be needed to serve the proposed single - family residences is included as part of the proposed project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this Initial Study. For example, construction emissions for excavation and installation of the water infrastructure is included in Sections 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions . Therefore, the proposed project would not resul t in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.

Wastewater Infrastructure
The project includes installation of onsite sewer lines within the proposed onsite streets that would connect to the existing sewer line in Cactus Avenue. These wastewater flows will be further transported to the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility.

The construction activities related to installation of the onsite sewer infrastructure that would serve the proposed project is included as part of the proposed project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this Initial Study. For example, construction emissions for excavation and installation of the sewer infrastructure is included in Section 3, Air Quality and 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions , and noise volumes from these activities are evaluated in Section 13, Noise. As th e proposed project includes facilities to serve the proposed development, it would not result in the need for construction of other new wastewater facilities or expansions, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. □ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 85 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in an increased demand for water supplies from the 37 single-family residential units. Water supplies to the project area are provided by EMWD, which serves 555 square miles of western Riverside County and includes the project area (UWMP 2015). In 2015, EMWD had a water demand of 146,090 AF, and based on land use and growth projections it anticipates a demand of 197,901 AF in 2020, which is a 35 percent increase over 2015 demands (an increase of 51,811 AF) (UWMP 2015). The UWMP details that the district has water supply to meet the projected demands over the next 25 years and beyond (UWMP 2015). The UWMP describes that the district has a projected supply of 197,901 AFY in 2020, and a predicted supply of 268,200 AFY in 2040.

To provide a conservative estimate of project water use, a generation rate of 171 gallons per capita per day was used to estimate water demand from the proposed project (UWMP 2015). As described in Section 14, Population and Housing, the proposed project would result in 143 additional residents at full occupancy. Based on the district’s 2020 water use target of 176 gallons per capita per day, the 143 additional residents would generate a water demand of 25,168 gallons per day. The project would limit water demand by inclusion of low -flow plumbing and irrigation fixtures, pursuant to the California Title 24 requirements.

As detailed previously, the district has the water supply to meet the projected demands over the next 25 years and beyond. In addition, the 2015 UWMP details the available supply, including groundwater, imported water, and recycled water would meet the projected demand during normal, single dry and multiple dry years (UWMP 2015). Therefore, impacts related to water supplies from the proposed project would be less than significant.

c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may s erve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?

Response:

Less than Significant Impact. As described above, wastewater flows would be conveyed to the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. The treatment facility typically processes 10.6 million gallons per day (mgd) but has a current capacity for 16 mgd and an ultimate capacity of 41 mgd (UWMP 2015). Through the city’s plan check process, the city’s engineering department would confirm that the wastewater generated from the project would be accommodated within this capacity. Thus, the wastewater treatment plant has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments, and impacts would be less than significant.

d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

Response:

Less Than Significant Impact. The closest landfill to the vacant project site is the Badlands Sanitary Landfill, which is located approximately 6 miles northeast from the project site at 31125 Ironwood Avenue in Moreno Valley. The landfill is permitted to accept 4,800 tons per day of solid waste and is permitted to operate through 2022 (CalRecycle 2020). In 2019, the landfill had an average throughput of 2,428 tons per day. As such, on average, the landfill would have a remaining capacity of 2,372 tons per day. As of March 2020, the landfill has a remaining capacity of 15,748,799 cubic yards (CalRecycle 2020).

The CalEEMod solid waste generation rate for single-family residential land use is 0.41 tons per resident per year. As described previously, full occupancy of the proposed project would generate approximately 143 new residents. Thus, operation of the project would generate approximately 58.6 tons per solid waste per year; or 1.13 tons per week. However, at least 75 percent of the solid waste is required by AB 341 to be recycled, which would reduce the volume of landfilled solid waste to approximately 0. 28 tons per week or 0.04 tons per day, which is within the Badlands Sanitary Landfil l’s □ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
□ □ ~ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 86 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
average remaining capacity of 2,372 tons per day. Thus, the proposed project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs and the project would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Impacts related to landfill capacity would be less than significant.

e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Response:

No Impact. The proposed project would result in new development that would generate an increased amount of solid waste. All solid waste-generating activities within the City are subject to the requirements set forth in Section 4.408 of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code that requires demolition and construction activities to recycle or reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste, and AB 341 that requires diversion of a minimum of 75 percent of operational solid waste. Implementation of the proposed project would be consistent with all state regulations, as ensured through the City’s development project permitting process. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with all solid waste statute and regulations; and impacts would not occur.

Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 2 – Conservation Element – Section 2.4 – Utilities • Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.7 – Water Quality • Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.3 – Solid Waste • Chapter 7 -- Conservation Element – Section 7.5—Water Resources - Figure 6-1 – Water Purveyor Service Area Map

2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.7 – Hydrology and Water Quality
- Figure 4.7-1 – Strom Water Flows and Major Drainage Facilities - Figure 4.7-2 – Groundwater Basins
• Section 5.13 – Public Services
- Figure 4.13-1 – Locations of Public Facilities

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code

4. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.10 Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls

5. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 8.21.170 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

6. Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.80 – Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste

7. California Emissions Estimator Model Appendix D Default Data Tables. Table 10.1 Solid Waste Disposal Rates. Accessed: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/upgrades/2016.3/05_appendix-d2016-3-

1.pdf?sfvrsn=2

8. CalReycyle Solid Waste Information System. Accessed at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory (Accessed May 12, 2020).

9. CalReycyle Disposal Reporting System: Jurisdiction Tons by Facility. Accessed at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility (Accessed May 12, 2020).

10. Eastern Municipal Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. Prepared by RMC. Available:
https://www.emwd.org/post/urban-water-management-plan (Accessed May 12, 2020).

11. Eastern Municipal Water District Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility Fact Sheet. Accessed:
https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/mvrwrffactsheet.pdf (Accessed May 12, 2020).

XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
□ □ □ ~
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 87 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Response:

No Impact. The project site is developed and within an urbanized residential area of Moreno Valley. The project site is surrounded by developed and urban areas. The project site is not adjacent to any wildland areas. According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone map, the project site is not within a fire hazard zone. The proposed project area would be accessed from two driveways on Bradshaw Circle. Permitting of these roadways would provide adequate and safe circulation to, from, and through the project area and would provide two routes for emergency responders to access different portions of the project area. Because the project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, as verified by the City potential impacts related to an emergency response or evacuation would be less than significant. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

Response:

No Impact. As discussed previously, the project site is developed and within an urbanized residential area of Moreno Valley. The project site is surrounded by developed and urban areas. The project site is not adjacent to any wildland areas, and as determined by the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone map, the project site is not within a fire hazard zone.

In addition, the project site is flat and within a flat area. The site is adjacent to roadways and residential developments.

There are no factors on or adjacent to the project site that would exacerbate wildfire risks. Thus, no impact related to other factors that would expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire would occur from the project.

c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

Response:

No Impact. As described previously, the project site is developed and within a developed and urban area that is not within a wildfire hazard zone. The project does not include any infrastructure that would exacerbate fire risks. In addition, the project would provide internal streets and fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants and sprinklers) that conform to the California Fire Code requirements, included as Municipal Code Chapter 8.36, as verified through the City’s permitting process. Therefore, impacts related to infrastructure that could exacerbate fire risks would not occur with the proposed project.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?

Response:

No Impact. As described previously, the project site is developed and within a developed and urban area that is not within a wildfire hazard zone. In addition, the project site is flat and surrounded by flat areas. There are no slope or hillsides that would become unstable. In addition, the project would install onsite drainage that would be conveyed to the existing flood control channel, which is consistent with the existing condition. Therefore, impacts related to flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes would not occur from the proposed project.

Sources:

1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 6 – Safety Element – Section 6.2- Fire and Emergency Services – 6.2.8—Wildland Urban Interface

3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code □ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
□ □ □ [g]
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 88 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

4. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Moreno Valley Fire Department, adopted October 4, 2011, amended 2017, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/haz-mit-plan.pdf • Chapter 5 – Wildland and Urban Fires
- Figure 4-2 – Moreno Valley High Fire Area Map 2016
• Chapter 8 – Landslide
- Figure 7-1 – Moreno Valley Slope Analysis 2016

5. Emergency Operations Plan, City of Moreno Valley, March 2009, http://www.moval.org/city_hall/departments/fire/pdfs/mv-eop-0309.pdf • Threat Assessment 3 – Wildfire

6. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2020. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map.

Accessed:
https://forestwatch.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Styler/index.html?appid=5e96315793d445419b6c96f89ce5d153 (Accessed May 12, 2020).

XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?

Response:

Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Habitat Assessment describes that the special-status wildlife and plant species with the potential to occur on the project site are covered by compliance with the MSHCP, which requires payment of fees, included as PPP BIO-1. Additionally, any impacts to SKR would be covered through payment of SKR fees as included in Mitigation Measure BIO-1. In addition, because the site supports suitable habitat for burrowing owl the MSHCP requires focused surveys pursuant to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the MSHCP area. Hence, Mitigation Measure BIO -2 requires a preconstruction burrowing owl survey to be conducted pursuant to the RCA Survey Instructions prior to start of ground disturbance activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2, impacts related to burrowing owl would be less than significant.

In addition, the Habitat Assessment identified suitable habitat and substrate for raptors and migratory birds that are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Section 3503.5 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) code. Therefore, Mitigation Measures BIO-3 and BIO-4 are included to require raptor and migratory nesting bird surveys if construction activities begin during the nesting season. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-3 and BIO-4, impacts related to protected bird species would also be reduced to a less than significant level.

As described in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the project site does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any of the California Register of Historical Resources criteria or qualify as “historical resources” as defined by CEQA.

Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

In addition, the Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Paleontological Overview determined that the potential for archaeological resources to be located within the project site is extremely low to nonexistent. However, the project area is considered moderately sensitive for paleontological resources. Thus, MM PAL- 1 has been included to require paleontological monitoring during all future excavations that would exceed a relative depth of five feet below the present surface. Thus, implementation of MM PAL-1 would reduce potential impacts to important examples of California prehistory to a less than significant level.

As described in Section 18, Tribal Cultural Resources, to avoid potential adverse effects to tribal cultural resources, Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-6, above and Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 have been included to provide for Native American and archaeological monitoring of excavation and grading activities to avoid potential impacts to tribal cultural resources that may be unearthed by project construction activities. □ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 89 City of Moreno Valley

ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.)?

Response:

Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project would redevelop the project site for single-family residences within a developed area. The project would provide land uses that are consistent with the adjacent single- family residential uses. As described above, all of the potential impacts related to implementation of the project would be less than significant or reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures that are imposed by the City that effectively reduce environmental impacts.

The other cumulative effects of the proposed project taken into consideration with these other projects would be limited, because the project site has already been developed and disturbed and the new uses onsite would not result in substantial change in the urban use of the area. As discussed in Section 19, Utilities and Service Systems, public services and utility infrastructure are in place to serve the project and would not result in cumulatively considerable increases in service and utility needs to serve the project. In addition, the project would not result in substantial effects to any environmental resource topic, as described though out this document.

Overall, the proposed project would develop an area that has been subject to previous urban uses, is disturbed, and is surrounded by consistent development and roadways. Impacts to environmental resources or issue areas would not be cumulatively considerable; and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with implementation of the previously identified mitigation measures related to biological resources, paleontological resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources.

c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?

Response:

Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project proposes development of the project site for single - family residential uses. As described previously, the project site is within an urban area and surrounded by consistent land uses. The project would not consist of any use or any activities that would result in a substantial negative affect on persons in the vicinity. All resource topics associated with the proposed project have been analyzed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and were found to pose no impacts or less -than-significant impacts with implementation of mitigation measures related to biological resources, paleontological resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources; and existing plans, programs, or policies that are required by the City. Consequently, the proposed project would in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.

□ □ ~ □
□ ~ □ □
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection) Cactus & Bradshaw Residential Project Page 90 City of Moreno Valley

DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS

Lead Agency:

City of Moreno Valley
Community & Economic Development Department
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, California 92552

CEQA Document Preparer:

EPD Solutions, Inc.

Konnie Dobreva, JD
Brad Perrine
Meaghan Truman

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Initial Study MND [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw Collection)

Exhibit B

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION F.1.n
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) [Revision 1] (6019 :

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

NOTICE OF INTENT

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Moreno Valley is considering a recommendation that the project herein identified will have no significant environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of the CEQA guidelines. A copy of the MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION and the ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST, which supports the proposed findings, are on file at the City of Moreno Valley.

Project: General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0174), Change of Zone (PEN20-0175), Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PEN20-0173), Tentative Tract Map 37858 (PEN20-0172) Applicant: RC Hobbs Company
Owner: Corp of Pres Bishop Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Representative: Roger Hobbs, RC Hobbs Company
Location: N orthside of Cactus Avenue, East of Moreno Beach Drive (478-090-018, 478-090-024, 478-090- 025)
Proposal: The applicant proposes to develop a 4.81- acre site with 37- lot single-family residential project.

Applications include a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation to Residential 10 (R10) with a Zone Change to change the Zoning designation from Residential 5 (R5) District to the Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for 37 single-family lots, including a park area, sidewalks, and on-site roadway parking.

Council District: 4
This Notice of Intent (NOI) has been prepared to notify agencies and interested parties that the City of Moreno Valley, as the Lead Agency , has prepared an Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of the project as described below.

Project Description: The applicant proposes to develop a 4.81- acre site with 37- lot single-family residential project.

Applications include a General Plan Amendment to change the existing land use designation to Residential 10 (R10) with a Zone Change to change the Zoning designation from Residential 5 (R5) District to the Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District, a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for 37 single-family lots, including a park area, sidewalks, and on-site roadway parking and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the parcel.

The Project site is not included on any list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.

Document Availability: The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all documents incorporated and/or referenced therein, can be reviewed during normal business hours (7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday and Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division counter, located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92553. The documents may also be reviewed on the City’s website at http://www.moreno- valley.ca.us/cdd/documents/about-projects.html.

Potential Environmental Impacts: The City of Moreno Valley has prepared an Initial Study to determine the environmental effects associated with the above actions and finds the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concludes that all potentially significant impacts of the Project would be mitigated to a less than significant level.

Comment Deadline: Pursuant to Section 15105(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has established a 20-day public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which begins October 13, 2022, and ends November 2, 2022. Written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration must be received at the City of Moreno Valley Community Development Department by no later than the conclusion of the 20- day review period, 5:30 p.m. on November 2, 2022. Written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration should be addressed to:

Magda Gonzalez, Contract Planner
14177 Frederick Street
Post Office Box 88005
Moreno Valley, California 92552
Phone: (951) 413-3206
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) [Revision 1] (6019 :

Email: [email protected]
Pr ess-Enterprise October 13, 2022
Sean Kelleher, Planning Official Newspaper Date of Publication Community Development Department
Sean Kelleher
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) [Revision 1] (6019 :

Exhibit C

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
F.1.o
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw

MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries out a project for which an Mitigated Negative Declaration has been certified which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects an d where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the project have been made, to adopt a “…reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment” (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6).

A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are successfully implemented. The City of Moreno Valley is the Lead Agency for the project and is responsible for implementation of the MMRP. Table 1 of t his report describes the MMRP for the Project and identifies the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in the MMRP. This report also describes existing Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs) that apply to the project in Table 2.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The MMRP for the Project will be active through all phases of the Project, including design, construction, and operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for the Project. The table identifies mitigation measures required by the C ity to mitigate or avoid significant impacts associated with the implementation of the Project, the timing of implementation, and the responsible party or parties for monitoring compliance.

The MMRP also includes a column that will be used by the compliance monitor (individual responsible for monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual Plan, Program, Policies; and mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the MMRP, indicating that the required actions have been completed.

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw

MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-2
This page intentionally left blank.

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) [Revision 1] (6019 : Bradshaw MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-3
TABLE 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
MM BIO-1: Payment of SKR Fees. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall pay all relevant Stephen’s kangaroo rat mitigation fees.

Prior to the issuance of
grading permits.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

MM BIO-2: Preconstruction Burrowing Owl Surveys. Pursuant to the MSHCP Objective 6, for burrowing owl, a preconstruction burrowing owl survey shall be conducted prior to issuance of a grading permit to verify the presence/absence of the owl on the Project site. Within thirty days of the onset of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall survey within 500 feet of the Project site for the presence of any active owl burrows. Any active burrow found during survey efforts shall be mapped on the construction plans. If no active burrows are found, no further mitigation would be required. Results of the surveys shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley. If nesting activity is present at an active burrow, the active site shall be protected until nesting activity has ended to ensure compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. Nesting activity for burrowing owl in the region normally occurs between March and August. To protect the active burrow, the following restrictions to construction activities shall be required until the burrow is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist: (1) clearing limits shall be established within a 500-
foot buffer around any active burrow, unless
otherwise determined by a qualified biologist, and (2) access and surveying shall be restricted within 300 feet of any active burrow, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Any encroachment into the buffer area around the active burrow shall only be allowed if the biologist determines that the proposed activity will not disturb the nest occupants. Construction can proceed when the qualified biologist has determined that fledglings have left the nest. If an active burrow is observed during the non- nesting season, the nest site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, and when the raptor is away from the nest, the biologist will either actively or passively relocate the Submittal of pre-activity
field survey results
report. Prior to
construction.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-4
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
burrowing owl based on direction from the WRC RCA. The biologist shall then remove the burrow so the burrowing owl cannot return to the burrow.

Therefore, based on the described construction activities and implementation of mitigation measures as identified, impacts to BUOW would not be significant.

MM BIO-3: Preconstruction Raptor Surveys. Seven days prior to the onset of construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30), a qualified biologist shall survey within 500 feet of the project impact area for the presence of any active raptor nests (common or special status). Any nest found during survey efforts shall be mapped on the construction plans. If no active nests are found, no further mitigation would be required. Results of the surveys shall be provided to the CDFW. If nesting activity is present at any raptor nest site, the active site shall be protected until nesting activity has ended to ensure compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. To protect any nest site, the following restrictions to construction activities are required un til nests are no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist: (1) clearing limits shall be established within a 500- foot buffer around any occupied nest, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist, and (2) access and surveying shall be restricted within 300 feet of any occupied nest, unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Any encroachment into the buffer area around the known nest shall only be allowed if the biologist determines that the proposed activity will not disturb the nest occupants. Construction can proceed when the qualified biologist has determined that fledglings have left the nest. If an active nest is observed during the non-nesting season, the nest site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist, and when the raptor is away from the nest, the biologist will flush any raptor to open space areas. A qualified biologist, or construction personnel under the direction of the qualified biologist, shall then remove the nest site so raptors cannot return to a nest.

Submittal of pre-activity
field survey results report
(if construction is
conducted between Feb.
and June). Prior to
Demolition or Grading
Permit.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-5
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
MM BIO-4: Preconstruction Nesting Bird Surveys. If construction is to occur during the MBTA nesting cycle (February 1 -September 15) than a nesting bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) may be considered take and is potentially punishable by fines or imprisonment. Active bird nests should be mapped utilizing a hand -held global positioning system (GPS) and a 300’ buffer will be flagged around the nest (500’ buffer for raptor nests). Construction should not be permitted within the buffer areas while the nest continues to be active (eggs, chicks, etc.).

Submittal of pre-activity
field survey results report
(if construction is
conducted between Feb.
and Sept.). Prior to
Demolition or Grading
Permit.

CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities. The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s) including the Pechanga Band of Indians, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP) as defined in Mitigation Measure CR-2. The Project archeologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and wi ll conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The archaeological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

Confirmation of
professional
archaeologist
retention/ongoing/monit
oring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
during subsurface
excavation.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-6
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
MM CR-2: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in Assembly Bill (AB) 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting Tribe is defined as a Tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB 52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project description and location
b. Project grading and development scheduling;
c. Roles and responsibilities of individuals on the Project; d. The pre -grading meeting and Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training details;
e. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe (s) and Project archaeologist will fol low in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
f. The type of recordation needed for inadvertent finds and the stipulations of recordation of sacred items.
g. Contact information of relevant individuals for the Project;

Confirmation of
professional
archaeologist
retention/ongoing/monit
oring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
during subsurface
excavation.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

MM CR-3: The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan:
“If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground – disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find."

Confirmation of
professional
archaeologist
retention/ongoing/monit
oring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-7
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
during subsurface
excavation.

MM CR-4: Inadvertent Finds. If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at the project site that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to Project approval, all ground disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation.

Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologist and Tribal Monitors, if needed.

Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration, and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in Mitigation Measure CR -1 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the si te has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

Confirmation of
professional
archaeologist
retention/ongoing/monit
oring/submittal of Report
of Findings. Prior to
Grading Permit and
during subsurface
excavation.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

MM CR-5: Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Submittal of two (2)
copies of the Phase III
and IV Data Recovery
City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-8
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre -grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.

Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Reports (if required).

Prior to Final Inspection.

MM CR-6: Human Remains . If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”.

The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations, and engage in consul tations concerning the treatment of the remains (California Public Resources Code 5097.98). (GP Objective 23.3, CEQA).

Ongoing during
subsurface excavation.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

PALEONTOLOGICAL
MM PAL-1: Paleontological Resources. A paleontologist selected from the roll of qualified paleontologists maintained by the City shall be retained to provide spot-check monitoring services for the project. The paleontologist shall develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Plan (PRIMP) to mitigate the potential impacts to unknown buried paleontological resources that may exist onsite. The PRIMP shall require that the paleontologist be present at the pre -grading conference to establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance. The PRIMP shall require paleontological spot-check monitoring of excavation that exceeds depths of 5 feet. The PRIMP Confirmation of
professional
paleontologist
retention/ongoing/monit
oring/submittal of
Paleontological
Resources Impact
Mitigation Plan (PRIMP).

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-9
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
shall state that the project paleontologist shall re -evaluate the necessity for paleontological monitoring after 50 percent or greater of the excavations deeper than 5 feet have been completed.

Recovery, salvage and t reatment shall be done at the applicant’s expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation by the paleontologist. Resources shall be identified and curated into an established accredi ted professional repository. The paleontologist shall have a repository agreement in hand prior to initiating recovery of the resource.

Prior to Grading Permit
and during subsurface
excavation.

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-10
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
TRIBAL
TCR-1: Native American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Luise ño Indians for tribal monitoring. The City is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance notice to the tribes of all ground disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are une
arthed. The Native American
Monitor(s) shall attend the pre -grading meeting with the Project Archaeologist, City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

Secure Tribal Monitoring
Agreements. Prior to
Grading Permit.

Qualified Professional
Archeologist/ City of
Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

TCR-2: Cultural Resource Disposition . In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible.

Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure CR-2 .

This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic Submit a CRMP prepared
by Professional
Archaeologist in
consultation with Tribe.

Prior to Grading Permit.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-11
Mitigation Measure
Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
recordation have been completed. No reco rdation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 The location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file wit h the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal
Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

TCR-3: Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations . It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specifi c exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

Reburial locations shall
not be publicly disclosed.

Pre- and post-project.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

F.1.o
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2022-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) MMRP
City of Moreno Valley Cactus and Bradshaw Residential Project

3-12
TABLE 2: EXISTING PLANS, PROGRAMS, OR POLICIES

PPP Action and Timing
Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials

AIR QUALITY
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

Compliance with Rule
402. Construction.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per S CAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions.
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day.
• The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.

Compliance with Rule
403. Construction.

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development
Department

PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only Compliance with Rule
1113. Construction.

Moreno Valley City CouncilDecember 20, 2022

Moreno Valley City Council
December 20, 2022