Agenda packet, regular meeting — Moreno Valley City Council, April 18, 2023 (part 12 of 12)

POLICIES
LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

LCC.1-2: Expand employment opportunities locally and provide sufficient lands for commercial, industrial, residential and public/quasi-public uses while ensuring that a high quality of life is maintained in Moreno Valley.

Growth Management

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality. (There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Its time to diversify our employment base so fewer of us have to commute to non-logistics jobs.) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2478 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) (The following is the argument against any warehouse going next to residential. MVTC does not meet these criteria from the MoVal 2040 General Plan)

BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN
Building Massing and Design Building massing refers to the visual dominance of buildings, while building design refers to a building’s architectural features. Building massing and design controls are crucial for ensuring appropriate, sensitive development, particularly when it is adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. Building massing and design measures to be considered include providing for sensitive transitions between new and existing development so as to reduce impacts to existing neighborhoods, incorporating human and pedestrian-scaled design for new commercial and mixed-use development, and building design that incorporates visual quality and interest to contribute to place making. (The MVTC proposal has the option to build a 100 foot tall warehouse which not appears very likely and this further violates it original intent and further impacts the visual character of the community.) Goal LCC-3: Build a distinctive sense of place and pride in Moreno Valley.

General
POLICIES LCC.3-1: Insist on high-quality development that is sensitive to surrounding context throughout the city and particularly in centers and corridors. (Warehouses don’t belong adjacent to residential.) LCC.3-2: Use development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another. (This is what the City fails to do all the time. In fact, little exists in the development standards to assure this can be done.)
Planning for a Pleasant, Healthy Noise Environment
Integrating noise reduction into the planning and design of projects can help address the potential for increased noise as development occurs and ensure a healthy and pleasant noise environment for residents and visitors alike. Proactively reducing noise at its source, separating and buffering noisy land uses, and designing for a quiet indoor environment will contribute to a healthy, livable neighborhood and a vibrant local economy.

In a vibrant city, some noise is inevitable, and making sure that noise-sensitive land uses such as schools and housing are separated from noisy uses is important to ensuring a pleasant, healthy noise environment for all. Land uses have different levels of compatibility relative to noise, and the State of California mandates that general plans include noise level compatibility standards for the development of land as a function of a range of noise exposure values The City has adopted Good Neighbor Guidelines for warehouse and distribution facilities into the zoning code that specify requirements to minimize the potential for impacts from these facilities on surrounding areas, including limiting noise generating activities near residential areas. (The MVTC is a massive warehouse that will be operating 24/7. Although expected noise levels will not physically harm the nearby residents, the constant background noise will disturb the peace and tranquility they would have expected to enjoy when the project site developed with homes as designated in MoVal 2040.)
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2479 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

N.1-5: Noise impacts should be controlled at the noise source where feasible, as opposed to at receptor end with measures to buffer, dampen, or actively cancel noise sources. Site design, building orientation, building design, hours of operation, and other techniques, for new developments deemed to be noise generators shall be used to control noise sources.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

ACTIONS N.2-A: Continue to maintain performance standards in the Municipal Code to ensure that noise generated by proposed projects is compatible with surrounding land uses.

N.2-B: Update the Municipal Code to establish controls on outdoor noise in public places, such as outdoor dining terraces in commercial mixed use areas, public plazas, or parks. Controls may include limits on noise levels or hours of operation.

AIR QUALITY
Pollution Control Statewide, 35 local air pollution control districts regulate emissions from businesses and stationary facilities, ranging from oil refineries to auto body shops and dry cleaners. Moreno Valley is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The Basin is designated as in “nonattainment” for select State air quality standards, which means that air pollutant emissions exceed acceptable levels for the region, indicating poor air quality.

EJ.1-C: Consider establishing a fee to be paid by new development to assist in the funding of local projects that contribute to the enhancement of air quality, particularly in DACs.

EJ.1-D: Work with the distribution and warehousing business community to improve outdoor air quality through improved operations and practices, such as planning for zero emissions trucks and vans.

Circulation

POLICIES
C.3-1: Strive to maintain Level of Service (LOS) “C” on roadway links, wherever possible, and LOS “D” in the vicinity of SR 60 and high employment centers. Strive to maintain LOS “D” at intersections during peak hours.

C.3-3: Where new developments would increase traffic flows beyond the LOS C (or LOS D, where applicable), require appropriate and feasible improvement measures as a condition of approval. Such measures may include extra right-of-way and improvements to accommodate additional left-turn and right-turn lanes at intersections, or other improvements.

C.3-4: Require development projects to complete traffic impact studies that conduct vehicle miles traveled analysis and level of service assessment as appropriate per traffic impact study guidelines. (With the surplus of logistics job in Moreno Valley employees will be traveling here from greater distances which is not addressed in the traffic impact study. ) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2480 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) C.3-8: Ensure that new development pays a fair share of costs to provide local and regional transportation improvements and to mitigate cumulative traffic deficiencies and impacts. (Moreno Valley has adopted the lowest Development Impact Fees for traffic mitigation in the entire region as noted in the last DIF Update report. This would seem unreasonable considering the city’s push to be a logistics hub and point of dispersement for e-commerce.) (Please note that even the city’s Municipal Code states that there should be transitional uses separating Warehousing from Residential. It does not matter the title of District designation for a particular piece of property as much as what uses are proposed creating conflicts adjacent uses.) Moreno Valley
Municipal Code Development Standards

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

A. Business Park District (BP). The primary purpose of the business park (BP) district is to provide for light industrial, research and development, office-based firms and limited supportive commercial in an attractive and pleasant working environment and a prestigious location. This district is intended to provide a transition between residential and other sensitive uses and more intense industrial and warehousing uses.

B. Light Industrial District (LI). The primary purpose of the light industrial (LI) district is to provide for light manufacturing, light industrial, research and development, warehousing and distribution and multitenant industrial uses, as well as certain supporting administrative and professional offices and commercial uses on a limited basis. This district is intended as an area for light industrial uses that can meet high performance standards. This district requires buffering between residential districts and industrial and warehouse structures greater than fifty thousand (50,000) square feet in building area within the LI district. Please refer to the special site development standards in Section 9.05.040(B)(9).

Everyone living in Moreno Valley depends on the City Council to look out for them. The denied Moreno Valley Trade Center warehouse proposal would seems warranted for a number of reasons express by the Planning Commission, local residents, and the facts outlined in this letter. It is unsettling to think that those people living the neighborhood south of this warehouse will be looking at a 100 foot tall building wall running the entire length of the neighborhood when a project of this type should never have been proposed here to being with.

Hope you give my thoughts sincere consideration and look out for the quality of life the Moreno Valley community and those residents that will be directly impacted by this warehouse and those traveling on Redlands Boulevard. This project needs to be denied and left to be developed as a residential area.

Sincerely
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2481 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: Moreno Valley Mayor; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center hearing
Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:13:11 PM
Attachments: Mayor Gutierrez Letter MVTC.docx
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Mayor Gutierrez,
Times are changing in Moreno Valley and hopefully you understand the sentiments of those near the site of the Moreno Valley Trade Center. They spoke up and the Planning Commission made the right decision to deny this project. As Councilman DelGado stated; "this is a good project but in the wrong location." Most realize that just across the street the WLC project has land capable of hosting 30 similar warehouses. Therefore, this area should be maintained for housing.

Attached is my full letter outlining the shortcoming of this project that have merit and should be considered. Please take a look at it and vote to uphold the Planning Commissions denial.

Sincerely,
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2482 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) November 14, 2022
To: Mayor Gutierrez,
City of Moreno Valley
Subject: Request to not overturn Planning Commission Denial of the Moreno Valley Trade Center Dear Council Member Mayor Gutierrez,
Having resided just south of the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) and next to the World Logistics Center (WLC), for many years, it is my hope that you can understand my and all most all those on this end of town objecting to yet another warehouse near us. We ask that you agree with the Planning Commissions denial of this project. Just east of this project, the WLC has the potential to build 30 similar sized warehouses. So, why the need for one more at the cost of losing valuable residential, increasing air pollution, intensifying truck traffic, and further impacting and devaluating residential property.

You should take note that there are a broad range of reasons why this project should have be approved.

Yes some are personal but may have to do with quality of life, environmental impacts, and inconsistencies with the MoVal 2040 General Plan.

Planning staff for the city should never have overlooked the following issues and standards. What follows are passages taken directly from the General Plan that defend the need to deny this project for its inconsistencies with the General Plan. (My comments in the following passages are those in bold italics.)
MoVal 2040 General Plan Goals, Policies, Actions

POLICIES
LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

Growth Management

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality. (There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Its time to diversify our employment base so fewer of us have to commute to non-logistics jobs.) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2483 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) (The following is the argument against any warehouse going next to residential. MVTC does not meet these criteria from the MoVal 2040 General Plan)

In a vibrant city, some noise is inevitable, and making sure that noise-sensitive land uses such as schools and housing are separated from noisy uses is important to ensuring a pleasant, healthy noise environment for all. Land uses have different levels of compatibility relative to noise, and the State of California mandates that general plans include noise level compatibility standards for the development of land as a function of a range of noise exposure values The City has adopted Good Neighbor Guidelines for warehouse and distribution facilities into the zoning code that specify requirements to minimize the potential for impacts from these facilities on surrounding areas, including limiting noise generating activities near residential areas. (The MVTC is a massive warehouse that will be operating 24/7. Although expected noise levels will not physically harm the nearby residents, the constant background noise will disturb the peace and tranquility they would have expected to enjoy when the project site developed with homes as designated in MoVal 2040.)
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2484 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

ACTIONS N.2-A: Continue to maintain performance standards in the Municipal Code to ensure that noise generated by proposed projects is compatible with surrounding land uses.

EJ.1-C: Consider establishing a fee to be paid by new development to assist in the funding of local projects that contribute to the enhancement of air quality, particularly in DACs.

EJ.1-D: Work with the distribution and warehousing business community to improve outdoor air quality through improved operations and practices, such as planning for zero emissions trucks and vans.

Circulation

C.3-4: Require development projects to complete traffic impact studies that conduct vehicle miles traveled analysis and level of service assessment as appropriate per traffic impact study guidelines. (With the surplus of logistics job in Moreno Valley employees will be traveling here from greater distances which is not addressed in the traffic impact study. ) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2485 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) C.3-8: Ensure that new development pays a fair share of costs to provide local and regional transportation improvements and to mitigate cumulative traffic deficiencies and impacts. (Moreno Valley has adopted the lowest Development Impact Fees for traffic mitigation in the entire region as noted in the last DIF Update report. This would seem unreasonable considering the city’s push to be a logistics hub and point of dispersement for e-commerce.) (Please note that even the city’s Municipal Code states that there should be transitional uses separating Warehousing from Residential. It does not matter the title of District designation for a particular piece of property as much as what uses are proposed creating conflicts adjacent uses.) Moreno Valley
Municipal Code Development Standards

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

Sincerely
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2486 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: Edward A. Delgado
Cc: City Clerk; Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Morino Valley Trade Center hearing
Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:13:26 PM
Attachments: Council Member DelGado Letter MVTC.docx
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good Afternoon Councilman DelGado,
Seems it is time to consider the Trade Center project again. Months ago, you appeared ready to agree with the Planning Commission's vote to deny the project. Recall you saying this was a good project is the wrong location. You are right. Next door, to the east, is the WLC with land available for 30 similar size warehouses. Since then, the developer has sweetened the deal with an offer to build a park. contribute $500,000 to enhance the city and campaign donations. If an established local business wanted to make a contribution to the city, it would appear to be a neighborly thing to do. But as an enticement to get a project approved is just not right.

These offers offend me and it should do so to you too.

The staff report implies that the developer now considers to build an e-commerce distribution center from a 100-foot-tall building. Previously, we were told that would not be the option.

This will be the largest building by cubic feet anywhere in the region and with it will be even more traffic not previously discussed publicly.

There are a litany of environmental impacts this project will bring that simply cannot be mitigated or even mitigated to the fullest financially feasible. Instead, the developer is burdening the city while enticing the project's approval with financial donations.

Attached is a letter outlining the full range issues this project fails to meet according to the MoVal 2040 General Plan. Please take a look at what the General Plan asks for and consider whether we really need another warehouse next to an area already established to produce as many as 30 similar warehouse. We need housing and job diversity.

Please uphold the Planning Commissions denial of the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Sincerely,
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2487 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) November 14, 2022
To: Council Members DelGado,
City of Moreno Valley
Subject: Request to not overturn Planning Commission Denial of the Moreno Valley Trade Center Dear Council Member DelGado,
Having resided just south of the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) and next to the World Logistics Center (WLC), for many years, it is my hope that you can understand my and all most all those on this end of town objecting to yet another warehouse near us. We ask that you agree with the Planning Commissions denial of this project. Just east of this project, the WLC has the potential to build 30 similar sized warehouses. So, why the need for one more at the cost of losing valuable residential, increasing air pollution, intensifying truck traffic, and further impacting and devaluating residential property.

You should take note that there are a broad range of reasons why this project should have be approved.

Yes some are personal but may have to do with quality of life, environmental impacts, and inconsistencies with the MoVal 2040 General Plan.

POLICIES
LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

Growth Management

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality. (There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Its time to diversify our employment base so fewer of us have to commute to non-logistics jobs.) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2488 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) (The following is the argument against any warehouse going next to residential. MVTC does not meet these criteria from the MoVal 2040 General Plan)

In a vibrant city, some noise is inevitable, and making sure that noise-sensitive land uses such as schools and housing are separated from noisy uses is important to ensuring a pleasant, healthy noise environment for all. Land uses have different levels of compatibility relative to noise, and the State of California mandates that general plans include noise level compatibility standards for the development of land as a function of a range of noise exposure values The City has adopted Good Neighbor Guidelines for warehouse and distribution facilities into the zoning code that specify requirements to minimize the potential for impacts from these facilities on surrounding areas, including limiting noise generating activities near residential areas. (The MVTC is a massive warehouse that will be operating 24/7. Although expected noise levels will not physically harm the nearby residents, the constant background noise will disturb the peace and tranquility they would have expected to enjoy when the project site developed with homes as designated in MoVal 2040.)
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2489 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

ACTIONS N.2-A: Continue to maintain performance standards in the Municipal Code to ensure that noise generated by proposed projects is compatible with surrounding land uses.

EJ.1-C: Consider establishing a fee to be paid by new development to assist in the funding of local projects that contribute to the enhancement of air quality, particularly in DACs.

EJ.1-D: Work with the distribution and warehousing business community to improve outdoor air quality through improved operations and practices, such as planning for zero emissions trucks and vans.

Circulation

C.3-4: Require development projects to complete traffic impact studies that conduct vehicle miles traveled analysis and level of service assessment as appropriate per traffic impact study guidelines. (With the surplus of logistics job in Moreno Valley employees will be traveling here from greater distances which is not addressed in the traffic impact study. ) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2490 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) C.3-8: Ensure that new development pays a fair share of costs to provide local and regional transportation improvements and to mitigate cumulative traffic deficiencies and impacts. (Moreno Valley has adopted the lowest Development Impact Fees for traffic mitigation in the entire region as noted in the last DIF Update report. This would seem unreasonable considering the city’s push to be a logistics hub and point of dispersement for e-commerce.) (Please note that even the city’s Municipal Code states that there should be transitional uses separating Warehousing from Residential. It does not matter the title of District designation for a particular piece of property as much as what uses are proposed creating conflicts adjacent uses.) Moreno Valley
Municipal Code Development Standards

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

Sincerely
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2491 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: David Marquez; David Marquez
Cc: City Clerk; Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Morino Valley Trade Center hearing
Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:13:43 PM
Attachments: Council Member Marquez Letter MVTC.docx
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good Afternoon Councilman Marquez,
Seems it is time to consider the Trade Center project again. You have honored your constituents on the east end and we know you will agree with the Planning Commission's vote to deny the project.

However, since you last considered this appeal, the developer has put out golden carrots offering to build a sports park, contribute $500,000 to a community foundation and made campaign contributions. I view these offers and a means of bribing the elected official to approve the project.

If an established local business wanted to make a contribution to the city, it would appear to be a neighborly thing to do. Remind everyone that Ex-Councilman Co went to jail for taking a bribe to get a land use and zoning change. Only difference here is the offer is made to the city publicly with strings attached. No project, no enhancements or funding. These offers offend me and it should do so to you too.

The staff report implies that the developer now considers building an e-commerce distribution center from a 100-foot-tall building. Previously, we were told that would not be the option. This will be the largest building by cubic feet anywhere in the region and with it will be even more traffic not previously discussed publicly.

Please put forth a Condition of Approval limiting the height of this warehouse to 50 feet even if you don't what the project approved. At least this would limit the facility should other vote to approve.

Please uphold the Planning Commissions denial of the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Sincerely,
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2492 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) November 14, 2022
To: Council Members Marquez,
City of Moreno Valley
Subject: Request to not overturn Planning Commission Denial of the Moreno Valley Trade Center Dear Council Member Marquez,
Having resided just south of the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) and next to the World Logistics Center (WLC), for many years, it is my hope that you can understand my and all most all those on this end of town objecting to yet another warehouse near us. We ask that you agree with the Planning Commissions denial of this project. Just east of this project, the WLC has the potential to build 30 similar sized warehouses. So, why the need for one more at the cost of losing valuable residential, increasing air pollution, intensifying truck traffic, and further impacting and devaluating residential property.

You should take note that there are a broad range of reasons why this project should have be approved.

Yes some are personal but may have to do with quality of life, environmental impacts, and inconsistencies with the MoVal 2040 General Plan.

POLICIES
LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

Growth Management

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality. (There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Its time to diversify our employment base so fewer of us have to commute to non-logistics jobs.) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2493 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) (The following is the argument against any warehouse going next to residential. MVTC does not meet these criteria from the MoVal 2040 General Plan)

In a vibrant city, some noise is inevitable, and making sure that noise-sensitive land uses such as schools and housing are separated from noisy uses is important to ensuring a pleasant, healthy noise environment for all. Land uses have different levels of compatibility relative to noise, and the State of California mandates that general plans include noise level compatibility standards for the development of land as a function of a range of noise exposure values The City has adopted Good Neighbor Guidelines for warehouse and distribution facilities into the zoning code that specify requirements to minimize the potential for impacts from these facilities on surrounding areas, including limiting noise generating activities near residential areas. (The MVTC is a massive warehouse that will be operating 24/7. Although expected noise levels will not physically harm the nearby residents, the constant background noise will disturb the peace and tranquility they would have expected to enjoy when the project site developed with homes as designated in MoVal 2040.)
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2494 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

ACTIONS N.2-A: Continue to maintain performance standards in the Municipal Code to ensure that noise generated by proposed projects is compatible with surrounding land uses.

EJ.1-C: Consider establishing a fee to be paid by new development to assist in the funding of local projects that contribute to the enhancement of air quality, particularly in DACs.

EJ.1-D: Work with the distribution and warehousing business community to improve outdoor air quality through improved operations and practices, such as planning for zero emissions trucks and vans.

Circulation

C.3-4: Require development projects to complete traffic impact studies that conduct vehicle miles traveled analysis and level of service assessment as appropriate per traffic impact study guidelines. (With the surplus of logistics job in Moreno Valley employees will be traveling here from greater distances which is not addressed in the traffic impact study. ) F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2495 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) C.3-8: Ensure that new development pays a fair share of costs to provide local and regional transportation improvements and to mitigate cumulative traffic deficiencies and impacts. (Moreno Valley has adopted the lowest Development Impact Fees for traffic mitigation in the entire region as noted in the last DIF Update report. This would seem unreasonable considering the city’s push to be a logistics hub and point of dispersement for e-commerce.) (Please note that even the city’s Municipal Code states that there should be transitional uses separating Warehousing from Residential. It does not matter the title of District designation for a particular piece of property as much as what uses are proposed creating conflicts adjacent uses.) Moreno Valley
Municipal Code Development Standards

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

Sincerely
Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2496 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Abigail A. Smith
To: Gabriel Diaz; City Clerk"s Dept_DG
Subject: Nov 15 2022 City Council Meeting - Agenda Item F1 - Public Comments Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 5:00:49 PM
Attachments: MV Trade Center Project- Sierra Club Comments City Council- Nov 14 2022.pdf Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear City of Moreno Valley:

On behalf of the Sierra Club-San Gorgonio Chapter, please find a comment letter regarding the Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park Project, Item F1 of the November 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda.

Thank you for distributing this letter and including it in your record of the proposed Project.

Sincerely,
Abigail Smith
Abigail A. Smith, Esq.

Law Office of Abigail Smith, A Professional Corporation 2305 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA. 92106
951-808-8595
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain information that is confidential, privileged or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by other recipients without express permission is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2497 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 1 Law Office of Abigail Smith
A Professional Corporation
2305 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92106 Abigail A. Smith, Esq.

Email: [email protected]
Telephone: (951) 808-8595
Facsimile: (951) 972-8488

VIA E-MAIL ONLY
November 14, 2022
Mr. Gabriel Diaz, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
[email protected]
City of Moreno Valley City Council
Attn: Jane Halstead, City Clerk
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
[email protected]
Re: Public Comments—November 15, 2022 City Council Meeting, Public Hearing Agenda Item F1: Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park Project including Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2020039038), General Plan Amendment PEN19-0191, Change of Zone PEN19-0192, Plot Plan PEN19-0193, and Tentative Parcel Map 37836
Dear City of Moreno Valley City Council:

Please accept these comments on behalf of the Sierra Club-San Gorgonio Chapter regarding the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park Project (“the Project”). This Project is currently scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on November 15, 2022, Item F1. This Project has been appealed by the developer following the Planning Commission’s decision to deny the Project in October 2021.

The City Council should uphold the Planning Commission’s denial of this Project. By a vote of 4-0, the Planning Commission voted to deny this Project because, F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2498 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
2 the Proposed Project’s warehouse and logistics center option was 1) inconsistent with the City’s General Plan; and 2) the Proposed Project’s warehouse and logistics center option would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to the surrounding community. (June 2022 Staff Report p. 1452)
Indeed, this Project represents poor planning as it locates a massive warehouse complex within 118 feet of existing homes. It brings more localized impacts to your citizens who are already overburdened by the effects of industrial development. The Project is blatantly inconsistent with the City’s General Plan which sets forth policies and goals to prevent this very type of incompatible development.

Moreover, the City Council should not be persuaded by the proposed “changes” to the Project’s site design. These changes do little to mitigate the Project’s impacts. For instance, the applicant has proposed to reduce the number of loading docks on the south side of the building by 4 docks and to reduce the building pad by 3 feet. These changes do not address the major land use and environmental impacts presented by the Project.

I. The City Should Not Approve a 1.2+ million square foot, 100- Foot Industrial Building Adjacent to Existing Single-Family Homes Regardless of the Project’s purported size reduction by approximately 65,000 square feet, the Project will construct and operate either a warehouse distribution/logistics use or a “e-commerce/fulfillment” use adjacent to existing single-family residences. The building could be up to 100 feet in height. The Staff Reports focus on the “smaller” “48 or 60 foot” building, with the Project intended as a distribution facility, but the Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) purports to evaluate, and therefore provide environmental clearance for, either development scenario including the “100 foot” building option.

The application should be denied because the Project—whether built to 100 feet or 48/60 feet—is fundamentally incompatible with surrounding uses, even with the purported site plan changes described in the Staff Report that were not evaluated through the EIR review process. The Project site is currently zoned residential; existing single-family homes are located immediately south of the Project site in a residential zone on the south side of Encelia Avenue. In contrast to surrounding uses, the Project proposes a massive, 1.2+ million square foot building to operate as a truck-intensive logistics or “e-commerce” center. If allowed, this building would substantially alter and degrade the quality of the existing environment. Closest residences are located a mere 118 feet from the site. Residents to the south of the site will be exposed to views of the 100-foot monolithic, walled building, especially as the record indicates the building will be constructed on an elevated pad. Reducing the elevation of the pad by a few feet (approximately 3 feet) will not eliminate the visual impacts of the proposed Project; nor is there any evidence in the record to support the recent claims that the visual impacts of the Project are eliminated as a result of the proposed changes to the Project’s design.

There are no aesthetic renderings or visual representations to support these claims.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2499 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
3 In addition to the physical changes to the environment presented by the Project, the Project’s intense industrial operations conflict with surrounding uses. Under the “warehouse distribution building option”, the building may have 117 loading docks on its south elevation as well as 97 docks on the north elevation. There is no justification for placement of loading docks on the south side of the building other than the applicant’s desire to maximize the full site. Big-rig trucks will pass through and maneuver at the site along the south side of the building (indeed, site plans indicate a vehicle lane along the south side of the facility), subjecting residents to the Project’s noise and air pollution.

The Project could be designed to: (1) locate dock doors on the northern elevation only, reducing the direct impacts to residents and presumably reducing the number of truck trips to/from the site; and (2) construct a building of no more than 48 or 60 feet comparable to existing warehouses in the City. Instead, the site has been maximized with development (horizontally in both development scenarios, and vertically in the “e-commerce building” scenario).

II. The City Does Not Need More Warehouse/Logistics Center Industrial Space The City has approved a multitude of warehouse projects in the last fifteen years including the 40+ million square foot World Logistics Center project which is located in the immediate proximity of the Project before you. These projects include:
- March Business Center (2009) – General Plan Amendment to allow 1,484,407 square feet of industrial warehouse space on 66.9-acres.
- Master Plot Plan PA07-0035 (2010) - 409,598 square foot industrial warehouse - West Ridge Commerce Center (2011) - 937,260 square foot warehouse distribution building
- VIP Moreno Valley Project (2012) - 1,616,133 square foot warehouse space - First Inland Logistics Center II Project (2013) - 400,130 square feet warehouse space - First Nandina Logistics Center Project (2014) - 1,450,000 square feet warehouse space - Prologis Eucalyptus Industrial Park Project (2015) - 2,244,419 square feet of warehouse uses including a General Plan Amendment from residential to Light Industrial - World Logistics Center (2015) - 40.6 million square feet of warehouse logistics development on 3,918 acres in eastern Moreno Valley. The World Logistics Center Project – immediately east of Redlands Avenue - will be located almost adjacent to the proposed Project.
- Indian Street Commerce Center Project (2016) - 446,350 square feet of warehouse space
- Moreno Valley Logistics Center (2016) - 1,736,180 total square feet of warehouse space
- Brodiaea Commerce Center (2017) - 262,398 square foot warehouse including a rezone from Business Park-Mixed Use to “Light Industrial”
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2500 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
4 - Moreno Valley Business Park (2021) - 220,390 square feet of warehouse logistics development including a General Plan Amendment to from commercial to light industrial
- Heacock Commerce Center (2021) – application for a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone for two high cube industrial buildings totaling 873,967 square feet - Compass Danbe Center Point (2021) – application for a General Plan Amendment to allow for the development of two light industrial buildings of 389,603 square feet - Edgemont Commerce Center (2022) – application for the development of a 142,325- square foot commerce center project
There is no justification for yet more warehouse space particularly given that virtually all these projects, like the current Project, result in significant air quality impacts. The burden of these projects falls on your residents. The City should promote development that does not compromise the health and welfare of its citizens, especially vulnerable persons such as children and the elderly as well as environmental justice populations.

III. The EIR Must Be Recirculated Pursuant to CEQA and the City’s Decision Not To Recirculate is Not Supported by Substantial Evidence The Staff Report states that the applicant has apparently proposed changes to the Project’s design and site plan. The changes require recirculation of the EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, 15088.5.

The revised “project description” requires re-circulation of the EIR, as CEQA requires that a project’s description be fixed and complete. The EIR does not accurately describe the proposed project considering the changes to the Project’s design and operation. Among other changes that necessitate recirculation are the claims in the Staff Report, unsupported by technical analysis, that the new “berm” will “completely block” views of the Proposed Project from the adjacent neighborhood (June 2022 Staff Report p. 12), and that the berm will “drastically reduce” the Project’s sound levels. These claims must be evaluated through the CEQA review process.

Redirecting Project trucks and vehicles to other roadways also requires recirculation of the EIR to evaluate these traffic and circulation changes. The Project is not being reduced in size in such a way that would substantially reduce its vehicle and truck traffic impacts; in fact, the reduction in building size does not prevent the Project from adding vertical space, as the EIR provides clearance for a 100-foot building (i.e., any size reduction could be illusory). The fact that Project vehicles and trucks are being re-routed to other streets and intersections does not eliminate the Project’s traffic impacts; it merely shifts them to other roadways.

Major revisions to the Project’s design and site plan must be evaluated through a recirculated CEQA document affording the public and others the opportunity to fully review and comment on the changes and their impacts.

Furthermore, the “changes” to the project (including the new “berm” are not adopted through the Project’s CEQA mitigation program, meaning that their enforceability is not assured. CEQA requires that mitigation measures must be fully enforceable. Also, to the extent F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2501 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
5 the applicant has proposed purported “Community Benefits,” including various payments to the City, these are not tied to any discernable plan to address the direct or indirect impacts of the Project and therefore do not represent CEQA mitigation in any form. It is unclear how funds collected by the “Moreno Valley Community Foundation” are distributed or implemented towards mitigation of impacts of industrial warehouse projects if at all.1 IV. The Project Is Still Inconsistent with the New 2040 General Plan Update and the City Has Failed to Make Adequate Findings of Consistency The Project is inconsistent with the City of Moreno Valley General Plan and the City cannot make the findings that the Project is consistent with the General Plan. The generic “findings” listed in the proposed Resolution adopting the GPA are not supported by substantial evidence. The City cannot and does not support the statement that the GPA is “consistent with existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the 2040 General Plan…” (Resolution p. 4) The Project is, in fact, inconsistent with the General Plan, with respect to the size and scale of the building as well as the proposed industrial use; and the conflicts between the Project and the General Plan result in significant and unmitigated CEQA land use impacts.

The “Vision and Guiding Principles” of the City’s General Plan Update2 include to support and create “Livable Neighborhoods” that “prioritize … community health.” (General Plan p. 1-10.) This Project does not “prioritize community health” with respect to the existing neighborhood immediately south of the Project site. According to the General Plan’s Land Use & Community Character Element, the purpose of the General Plan’s land use designations are to “enhance[] livability and quality of life for current and future residents..” (General Plan p. 2-8.) Yet the Project seeks a GPA to change the site’s land use designation from residential to industrial to allow an industrial operation that brings substantial truck traffic and noise to an existing residential area. The General Plan states that “residential neighborhoods form the basic fabric of the community. These are areas of the city characterized primarily by housing, parks, and community facilities.” Id. The Project—an industrial facility consisting of roundthe-clock operations and hundreds of truck trips per day —represents the opposite of community-oriented development.

With respect to the building’s design, the General Plan states that “[b]uilding massing and design controls are crucial for ensuring appropriate, sensitive development, particularly when it is adjacent to residential neighborhoods.” (General Plan p. 2-30 (emphasis added).) Among other things, the General Plan states, “[b]uilding massing and design measures to be considered include providing for sensitive transitions between new and existing development so as to reduce impacts to existing neighborhoods.” Id. (emphasis added) The Project will cover the site with a giant, box-style, 1.2+ million square foot, 100-foot (or 48/60 foot) building “adjacent to residential neighborhoods.” Under any 1 See, http://www.moval.org/communityfoundation/
This hyperlink and its contents, and each of the hyperlinks and their contents cited in this letter, are hereby incorporated by reference as if reproduced herein. 2 The 2040 General Plan Update is currently under legal challenge. The Project also conflicts with the policies and goals of the 2006 General Plan.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2502 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
6 reasonable interpretation of the General Plan’s design principles, the industrial Project is not a “sensitive development”; nor does it provide a “sensitive transition” between the site and the adjacent residential community. The Project is patently inconsistent with the principles, policies, and goals of the new General Plan with respect to land use compatibility.

General Plan Policy LCC 3.2 directs the City to “use development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another.” General Plan p. 2-

31. Policy LCC.3-17 requires the City to “[s]creen and buffer nonresidential projects to protect adjacent residential property and other sensitive land uses when necessary to mitigate noise, glare, and other adverse effects on adjacent uses.” General Plan p. 2-32. Policy N.1-2 directs the City to “[g]uide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.” General Plan p. 7-8. The Project conflicts with, and is inconsistent with, these and other General Plan policies including those of the Environmental Justice element of the General Plan.

V. The Final EIR Does not Comply with CEQA and Additional Mitigation is Required
The Project should not be approved at this time because the Final EIR does not comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and additional mitigation must be imposed before the EIR can be legally certified.

A. Aesthetic Impacts
The EIR concludes that the Project’s aesthetic impacts are significant in that the Project building will “mostly or completely” block views from vantage points such as from south of the Project site. Undoubtedly, a 1.2+ million square foot building with potentially 100-foot, solid, tilt-up concrete walls, with very little articulation or variation, will obstruct views and adversely impact visual resources. The EIR states there is no mitigation available to reduce these impacts. However, the Project could be developed with a smaller footprint to allow for views to be maintained, even if partially. The building could be shrunk on the west side to allow more southerly homes to retain views; or the site could be designed with smaller industrial buildings that are clustered or placed in such a way to retain some views across the site. It is not shown based on any evidence that a building of more than one-million-square feet and 100 feet in height is required for any reason, especially as no tenant is presently identified or known.

Alternatively, the Project’s significant aesthetic impacts could be mitigated by developing the Project at an alternate site; this option is not explored through the EIR. The EIR’s alternatives analysis states that alternative sites were not considered because an alternative site would not reduce the Project’s significant air quality impacts. DEIR p. 6-3.

However, given the Project’s proposal to build a 100-foot building adjacent to a residential neighborhood, the EIR should study alternative sites that could more reasonably accommodate such a use. The City as the lead agency has an obligation under CEQA to conduct a good faith, F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2503 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
7 independent analysis of the Project’s environmental impacts including an examination of reasonable alternatives to the proposed Project.

The rapid growth of industrial warehouse development in the Inland Empire in the last ten years3 4 5 6 suggests there are alternative sites available within Moreno Valley and other jurisdictions. Alternative sites should be considered and evaluated as mitigation for significant aesthetic impacts. According to the 2040 General Plan, “a full 32% of the land within the City limit is vacant, including large undeveloped tracts of land at the interior of the city…” General Plan p. 2-2. The General Plan created new industrial and “office” land use designations for properties that presumably could be utilized for a project of this type such as vacant land designated “office” north of, and immediately adjacent to, State Route 60. 7 The EIR reasons there is no mitigation available to reduce the significant impact based on the design specifications of “typical” warehouse distribution/logistics buildings. First, the site is currently zoned for residential uses. It is not a foregone conclusion that the site will be developed with an industrial use of any kind; in addition, there is currently no tenant for the building, so there are no design specifications that are specifically required by the user. Second, the applicant was presumably aware of the site’s zoning when purchasing the property and/or undertaking development. Should an industrial building of a certain size or type be required, the applicant should explore an alternate site that can more reasonably accommodate the desired building within existing zoning designations.

In short, aesthetic impacts are not unmitigable, as it is feasible to (1) redesign the Project to preserve views and lessen the size and intensity (i.e., “massing”) of the building, or (2) develop the Project on a more appropriate site within the City. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record to suggest that the new “berm” will obscure the massive building (constructed on an elevated pad) from adjacent residences.

B. Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts
Contrary to the conclusions of the EIR, the Project results in a significant GHG and land use impacs as a result of inconsistency with policies and programs of the City’s General Plan. By way of example, the Project does not demonstrate consistency with Objective 6.7 to “reduce mobile and stationary source air pollutant emissions.” The Project increases these emissions, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is proposed for significant air quality impacts. There is no evidence that the Project “reduce[s] vehicle trip lengths”. (Table 3-8 GHG 3 https://www.cbre.us/people-and-offices/corporate-offices/los-angeles/greater-los-angeles-mediacenter/inland-empire-warehouse-2019 4 https://www.cbre.us/research-and-reports/US-MarketFlash-Dealmakers-E-Commerce-Logistics-FirmsDrive-Demand-for-Large-Warehouses-in2019?utm_source=Media&utm_medium=Local%20news%20releases&utm_campaign=January%20Indus trial%20flash
5 https://www.pe.com/2020/01/30/ie-leads-the-nation-in-major-warehouse-deals-by-a-lot/ 6 https://earthjustice.org/blog/2020-april/amazon-inland-empire-workers-covid-19 7 http://www.moval.org/city_hall/general-plan/landuse-map.pdf F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2504 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
8 Report). The Project locates a major industrial distribution center more than fifty miles from the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, thus requiring trucks to travel hundreds of miles for delivery of goods to and from the Project site. There is no evidence of consistency with policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”). The Project does not require local hiring, for instance. Nor is there evidence that the Project supports employment that is consistent with housing costs in the City of Moreno Valley. The Project does not support R2-T1: the Project is not a “Transit Priority Project”8 as asserted in Table 3-9 of the Project’s GHG Report.

Among other things, the Project is not consistent with existing land use designations. See, id.

There is no evidence to support the claim that a new industrial distribution center creating hundreds of truck and vehicle trips per day will reduce vehicle trip lengths. The Project thus does not support R2-T3 of Table 3-9. The conclusion of the EIR that the Project is consistent with these policies is specious and without support in the record.

C. The So-Called “Community Benefits” Described In Various Project Documents Must Be Adopted As Enforceable CEQA Mitigation Measures The Project applicant has identified numerous “community benefit” measures via disparate letters and proposed agreements in connection with the proposed Project. These “benefits” are described in Exhibits A, B, and C to proposed Resolution 2022-___ [approving community benefits, etc.], a document included with the materials available for the Moreno Valley Trade Center Agenda Item. As many of these alleged “benefits” of the Project are, in fact, feasible air quality, noise, or greenhouse gas emission mitigation measures they must be adopted through the CEQA mitigation program.

CEQA requires that a lead agency adopt all feasible mitigation measures for significant impacts. Where measures are identified by the applicant as feasible for implementation as “community benefits” there is no justifiable reason for excluding these measures from the CEQA mitigation program to ensure their enforceability and continuity. These include, for instance, installation of a 14-foot wall; designing the building to LEED Silver certification standards; and installing a minimum of 12 onsite electric vehicle chargers. The alleged “benefits” described in the disparate Project documents - outside of the EIR and the CEQA review process - must be included in the Project’s CEQA Mitigation Program. Otherwise, they are not enforceable pursuant to CEQA standards.

D. The City Must Adopt All Feasible Mitigation Measures The City has been presented with feasible mitigation measures such as requiring the use of solar power for the Project. These measures have not been shown to be infeasible within the meaning of CEQA.
8 https://www.sacog.org/post/transit-priority-and-sustainable-communities-projects-consistent-scs F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2505 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
9 E. The EIR’s Alternatives Analysis is Faulty, and the City Must Adopt the Environmentally Superior Alternative
The Reduced Building Area alternative is shown to be environmentally superior to the proposed Project with respect to the Project’s significant aesthetic impacts. The alternative would develop a portion of the site with a parking area and would reduce the building area by approximately 400,000 square feet. The EIR claims that a 10-14 feet tall screening wall to shield the outdoor storage area from the street would be “comparable” to the visual impacts associated with the proposed project. On the contrary, it is reasonable to assume that a 10-14 foot screening wall has a lesser visual impact than a 100-foot building that completely blocks views across the site. To ensure that alternatives are properly assessed and considered, CEQA “contains a `substantive mandate’ requiring public agencies to refrain from approving projects with significant environmental effects if ‘there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures' that can substantially lessen or avoid those effects’.” County of San Diego v. GrossmontCuyamaca Community College Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 86, 98; Pub. Res. Code § 21002.

A lead agency may not reject an alternative unless the agency makes findings supported by substantial evidence showing that the alternative is infeasible. Public Resources Code §§ 21081 (a), 21081.5; Guidelines, §§ 15091 (a)(3), 15092. Rejected alternatives must be “truly infeasible.” City of Marina v. Bd of Trustees of Calif. State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341, 369 (“City of Marina”); see, Guidelines § 15364 (defining “feasible”). Absent findings of infeasibility supported by substantial evidence, the City must adopt the Reduced Building Area alternative as it is environmentally superior in at least the area of visual impacts, and because the EIR claims that it also “reduces” air quality and GHG emission impacts, albeit without any supporting data to support those conclusions. Because this feasible alternative would reduce impacts according to the EIR, it must be adopted pursuant to CEQA.

VI. The Statement of Overriding Considerations Is Not Supported by Substantial Evidence
The Statement of Overriding Considerations asserts the Project will generate employment opportunities for local residents but this claim is not supported by evidence where the Project is speculative (i.e., tenants and uses are unknown), and there is no commitment to local hiring. Claims that the Project is needed to support employment and tax-generating uses in the City are not supported by factual evidence such as economic data to show that the Project will generate revenue for the City or a certain number of jobs. The Statement of Overriding Considerations reads like a generic list of alleged benefits; and it is unsupported by any factual information. As the Project is speculative, the alleged benefits of the Project are simply unknown. Furthermore, as the City already has a multitude of warehouse projects either in development or proposed for development (including the 40+ million square foot World Logistics Center), it is simply unreasonable to assert, without evidence, that yet more industrial warehouse developments is needed for compelling economic reasons.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2506 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
10 VII. The City Has Improperly Segmented the “Park” Project from the Proposed Industrial Project
In connection with the proposed Project, the applicant has apparently proposed to fund an 18-acre public park as an alleged “community benefit”. This “park project” is loosely described in ancillary project documents. Ostensibly the aim of the “park project” is to offer some “trade-off” “benefit” of the deleterious Project. This sports park at SE Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave is just north of SR-60 and on a City- designated diesel truck route which will be used by some of the World Logistic Centers 13,000 daily diesel truck trips as well as the proposed Project and about five other warehouses just south of SR-60. The children playing sports at the park will be breathing deeply and making the truck route even more harmful. The “park project” has not been evaluated pursuant to the Project EIR, in violation of CEQA.

Per CEQA, the two proposals – the industrial development project and the “park” that is included in the bundle of approvals that are being proposed in connection with the industrial development project - must be considered one “project” for purposes of CEQA review. The “park project” must be described and evaluated in the Project EIR. Without such disclosures and analysis, the EIR fails to provide sufficient information for the public and decision-makers.

The term “project” under CEQA refers to the whole of an action and to the underlying physical activity being approved, not to each government approval (CEQA Guidelines, section 15378 (c).) The City may not “segment” the two proposals so that environmental review occurs separately. The City claims without legal or logical basis that the “Community Park is entirely separate from Developer’s Project and is being proposed as a separate community benefit. The Community Park shall be subject to separate review and approval by the City.” (Exhibit C to proposed Resolution 2022-__ [accepting community benefits, etc.]) CEQA does not permit segmentation of projects that are clearly related, as here. This is particularly the case when the “park” will be proposed in an area subject to major pollution from the World Logistics Center, SR-60, and other industrial development. The park is not “speculative” in that it is described in a discreet location, will be of a certain size, etc. The park is part of the proposed “project”, as that term is defined broadly under CEQA, and, as such, it must be evaluated contemporaneously with the industrial development, so the environmental effects of the applicant’s entire proposal can be properly evaluated and mitigated.

VIII. Conclusion
For these reasons, Sierra Club urges the City to deny the developer’s appeal of this Project which will bring environmental harms and incompatible growth to an overburdened community.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2507 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) City of Moreno Valley City Council– Moreno Valley Trade Center Project Sierra Club Public Comments
November 14, 2022
11 Sincerely,
Abigail Smith
Attorney for Sierra Club – San Gorgonio Chapter
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2508 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Ann McKibben
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: FW: Vote NO, F-1 Moreno Valley Trade Center, Nov 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 5:02:01 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Mr. Kelleher:

I have sent the following letter to the city councilmembers and the mayor.

I am forwarding it to you so it can be included in the public record.

Ann McKibben
Re: VOTE NO—City Council Meeting, November 15, 2022, F-1 Moreno Valley Trade Center
Please vote NO on the Moreno Valley Trade Center project.

The proposed project would be adjacent to already established homes and neighborhoods. The project site is zoned for housing. It is not a compatible land use for adjacent homes. It does not follow the city’s newly approved general plan
The levels of Air Pollution will worsen with the increase numbers of trucks moving through adjacent streets.

The increase in Traffic will negatively affect the quality of life for those who live adjacent to the proposed project and the city in general.

The city cannot ‘mitigate’ the project to protect our health and make it acceptable to adjacent residents.

I get weekly emails the city sends out regarding our community. All of them are very positive, upbeat about the quality of life, etc. in our city and all the good works the city staff and elected officials are doing for our community.

I don’t see how putting new warehouses next to homes improves our community or makes it a livable community.

Please vote NO on this project.

Sincerely,
Ann McKibben
92557
Moreno Valley Resident since 1985
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2509 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Linda Scheschy
To: [email protected]; Edward A. Delgado; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Sean P. Kelleher Cc: Terry 2Shay; City Clerk
Subject: Trade Center Proposal
Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 6:22:01 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please do not approve the Trade Center being proposed for the corner of Eucalyptus, Encelia and Redlands Blvd.

The community next to that property is one of a few nice neighborhoods in Moreno Valley. Having a warehouse in the next plot of land will immediately lower our property value. We already have big trucks driving past the signs south on Redlands and backed up traffic coming from Sketchers getting on the freeway every day. We can already hear the warehouse operations from Solaris and they a mile away! East of us, beginning on Theodore there are thousands of vacant acres of land perfect for a warehouse and your proposed Pilot Station. Put them on that land, don’t devastate this beautiful, quiet family community of tax payers with a warehouse in our backyard.

I was at the meeting in December 2021, and I know there were 3 “No” votes coming that night…your tax paying citizens DO NOT want this warehouse on this property!!! I know you will have lots of ( Liuna )union members there tomorrow night to talk about “all” of the wonderful union jobs…they are not your tax paying citizens, they are paid by the developer to speak. Yep when the building is being built there will be temporary union jobs. They can have those same jobs, one mile away on Theodore. The Developer told us all in December there was not a tenant slated for that building…so when it is finished an unknown company may or may not (there are still thousands of square feet of vacant, new warehouse property, on Van Buren in Riverside) lease the building and they may already have employees they are relocating =NO NEW JOBS to Moreno Valley residents. I know all of you already know all of this…But your tax paying, voting citizens DO NOT WANT THIS BUILT on Redlands Blvd! Sincerely,
Linda Scheschy
13315 Wexford Ave.

Moreno Valley
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2510 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rick Thomas Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:59:33 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rick Thomas
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2511 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Andrea Kristen Brown Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Andrea Kristen Brown
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2512 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Antonio Garcia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Antonio Garcia
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2513 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Guy Durr Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Guy Durr
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2514 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: James Bergeron Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

James Bergeron
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2515 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rena Martinez Stluka Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rena Martinez Stluka
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2516 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Adam Jensen Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Adam Jensen
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2517 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Daniel Tillery Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Daniel Tillery
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2518 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Dempster Jackson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dempster Jackson
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2519 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Iddo Highland Scammer Benzeevi Fairview Corporate Influence Lowlife Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Iddo Highland Scammer Benzeevi Fairview Corporate Influence Lowlife 92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2520 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Janneth Revelez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Janneth Revelez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2521 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lisa Turnbow Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lisa Turnbow
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2522 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lizbeth Gonzalez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lizbeth Gonzalez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2523 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Peterkin Anyanwu Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Peterkin Anyanwu
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2524 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Sandra Aguillon Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:25 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sandra Aguillon
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2525 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Annette Du Pont Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Annette Du Pont
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2526 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Armand Haros Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Armand Haros
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2527 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Bill Everett Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Bill Everett
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2528 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: CHRIS FLORES Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

CHRIS FLORES
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2529 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Edgar Martinez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Edgar Martinez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2530 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ericka Thagard Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ericka Thagard
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2531 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gina Velasco Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gina Velasco
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2532 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jaqueline Campos Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jaqueline Campos
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2533 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jessica Gomez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jessica Gomez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2534 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Juan Espinoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan Espinoza
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2535 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Laszo Valladolid Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Laszo Valladolid
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2536 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Maria Garcia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Maria Garcia
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2537 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mathias Ramirez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mathias Ramirez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2538 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Nicole Santana Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nicole Santana
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2539 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Omari Smith Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Omari Smith
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2540 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Paulina Guillen Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Paulina Guillen
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2541 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Tyler Brunson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:26 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Tyler Brunson
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2542 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Abelardo Romero Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Abelardo Romero
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2543 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Beatrice Garcia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Beatrice Garcia
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2544 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Belem Morris Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Belem Morris
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2545 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Catherine Mendoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Catherine Mendoza
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2546 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Davion Pearson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Davion Pearson
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2547 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gael Scott Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gael Scott
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2548 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gustavo Villagomez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gustavo Villagomez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2549 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jack Huggins Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jack Huggins
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2550 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jorge Peralta Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jorge Peralta
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2551 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Kellee Dobbs Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Kellee Dobbs
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2552 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Luis Vera Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Luis Vera
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2553 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Luis vasquez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Luis vasquez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2554 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mayra Espinoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mayra Espinoza
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2555 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mayra Espinoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mayra Espinoza
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2556 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Nelson Flores Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nelson Flores
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2557 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rebeccah Musakwa Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rebeccah Musakwa
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2558 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: STEVEN CHRISTIAN Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

STEVEN CHRISTIAN
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2559 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Veronica Vicente Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Veronica Vicente
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2560 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Amara Navarro Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Amara Navarro
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2561 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Antonio Sylvia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Antonio Sylvia
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2562 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Beatrice Irving Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Beatrice Irving
92567
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2563 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Carolina Sida Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Carolina Sida
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2564 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Enrique Guzman Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Enrique Guzman
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2565 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: James Hughey Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

James Hughey
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2566 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: James Trotter Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

James Trotter
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2567 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: John Zaragoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

John Zaragoza
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2568 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Joseph Bravo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Joseph Bravo
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2569 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lenin Moncayo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lenin Moncayo
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2570 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: MORE WAREHOUSES MORE POLLUTION Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

MORE WAREHOUSES MORE POLLUTION
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2571 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mareena Perez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mareena Perez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2572 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Michael Joshua Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Michael Joshua
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2573 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Omar Cobian Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Omar Cobian
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2574 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Pamela Green Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Pamela Green
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2575 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Selena Bravo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Selena Bravo
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2576 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: renee rico Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter. renee rico
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2577 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Alphandra Sanders Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Alphandra Sanders
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2578 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Angel Martinez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Angel Martinez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2579 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Fernando Palomares Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Fernando Palomares
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2580 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: George Aguilar Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

George Aguilar
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2581 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: James Rogers Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

James Rogers
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2582 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jesu Gonzalez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jesu Gonzalez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2583 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jose Martinez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jose Martinez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2584 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Kamari Reed Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Kamari Reed
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2585 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mario Zuniga Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mario Zuniga
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2586 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Monisha Nix Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Monisha Nix
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2587 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Naomi Dyson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Naomi Dyson
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2588 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Nileshkumar Macwan Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nileshkumar Macwan
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2589 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Paul R Schultz Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Paul R Schultz
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2590 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rachel Jackson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rachel Jackson
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2591 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Roberto Cervantes Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Roberto Cervantes
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2592 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ron Dudeck Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ron Dudeck
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2593 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Sergio Zambrano Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sergio Zambrano
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2594 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Terry King Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Terry King
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2595 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: julio flores Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter. julio flores
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2596 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cameron Carenen Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cameron Carenen
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2597 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Christine Ryan Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Christine Ryan
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2598 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Conrad Gomez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Conrad Gomez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2599 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: David Marquez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

David Marquez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2600 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Dominique Pearson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dominique Pearson
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2601 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Hardeep Bassi Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Hardeep Bassi
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2602 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jeffrey Castillo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jeffrey Castillo
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2603 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jo Silva Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jo Silva
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2604 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Magdalena ZepedaSeLegue Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Magdalena ZepedaSeLegue
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2605 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Patrick Lucas Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Patrick Lucas
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2606 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Teesha Lucas Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Teesha Lucas
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2607 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: alejandro soto Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:30 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter. alejandro soto
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2608 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Betty Jo Lewis Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:31 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Betty Jo Lewis
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2609 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Juan Orozco Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:31 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan Orozco
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2610 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Abraham Beltran Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Abraham Beltran
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2611 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cheryl Cerda-Uribe Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cheryl Cerda-Uribe
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2612 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Christopher Arteaga Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Christopher Arteaga
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2613 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Daniel Castaneda Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Daniel Castaneda
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2614 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Daniel Palomera Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Daniel Palomera
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2615 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Fernando F Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Fernando F
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2616 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Hugo Rael Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Hugo Rael
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2617 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Richard Silva Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Richard Silva
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2618 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cynthia Atkinson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:33 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cynthia Atkinson
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2619 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Daniel Navarrete Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:33 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Daniel Navarrete
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2620 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Morgan Maple Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:33 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Morgan Maple
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2621 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Erick Gutierrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:34 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Erick Gutierrez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2622 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Martin Cuellar Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:34 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Martin Cuellar
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2623 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gwin Shannon Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gwin Shannon
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2624 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jonathan Macias Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jonathan Macias
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2625 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Juan c Molina Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan c Molina
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2626 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Prince Hall Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Prince Hall
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2627 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: A G Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center!
Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:37 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

A G
95551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2628 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: James Williamson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:37 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

James Williamson
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2629 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Steven Horton Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:37 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Steven Horton
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2630 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Janet Velasco Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:38 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Janet Velasco
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2631 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Juan Gomez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:38 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan Gomez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2632 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Russell Shafer Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:39 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Russell Shafer
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2633 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Francisco Gallegos Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:40 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Francisco Gallegos
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2634 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Paul Vanderhoek Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:40 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Paul Vanderhoek
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2635 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Randy Wingate Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:40 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Randy Wingate
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2636 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Bryan Vallejo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:41 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Bryan Vallejo
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2637 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rick Thomas Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:06:42 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rick Thomas
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2638 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gerardo Topete Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gerardo Topete
92533
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2639 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Hanh Truong Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Hanh Truong
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2640 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Noah Ball Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Noah Ball
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2641 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Samuel Brown Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Samuel Brown
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2642 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cheryl Foster Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:37 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cheryl Foster
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2643 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Betuel Rosas Jr Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:38 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Betuel Rosas Jr
92503
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2644 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Gracie Sanchez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:39 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Gracie Sanchez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2645 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Hector Garcia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:39 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Hector Garcia
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2646 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Otto Castillo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:40 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Otto Castillo
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2647 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Victor Mondragon Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:40 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Victor Mondragon
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2648 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Dalton McClymont Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:43 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dalton McClymont
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2649 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jose Aguayo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:43 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jose Aguayo
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2650 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Abraham Campos Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Abraham Campos
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2651 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Robert Hart Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Robert Hart
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2652 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lanier Milner Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:45 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lanier Milner
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2653 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Bernardo López Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:48 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Bernardo López
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2654 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ernie Barajas Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:49 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ernie Barajas
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2655 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Samuel Kennedy Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:11:50 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Samuel Kennedy
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2656 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Roderick Shelby Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 11:18:27 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Roderick Shelby
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2657 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ivan Ocejo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 1:53:23 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ivan Ocejo
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2658 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Robert Rodriguez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 4:07:31 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Robert Rodriguez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2659 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Anabelle Macaso Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 4:44:11 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Anabelle Macaso
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2660 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lori Hunter Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 5:15:15 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lori Hunter
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2661 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Nathan Martin Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:01:32 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Nathan Martin
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2662 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jason Arellano Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:15:50 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jason Arellano
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2663 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mary Gutiérrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 9:49:09 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mary Gutiérrez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2664 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Juan Andrade Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 10:00:19 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Juan Andrade
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2665 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Manuel Aguiar Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 10:00:20 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Manuel Aguiar
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2666 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Marietta Trovela Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 10:09:33 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Marietta Trovela
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2667 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Loris Allen Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 10:15:01 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Loris Allen
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2668 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Zaseles S Ohm Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 10:46:27 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Zaseles S Ohm
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2669 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Sonia Guzman Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:02:07 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Sonia Guzman
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2670 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ramon Guzman Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:02:21 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ramon Guzman
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2671 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Lillian L Quartermus Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:26:47 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Lillian L Quartermus
92503
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2672 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jason C. Lo
To: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Gabriel Diaz; Sean P. Kelleher; Mike Lee
Subject: IN FAVOR: 1,300,000 sq ft Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:10:03 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hi:

I am writing to support this project that I understand will be discussed on June 21, 2022. I have residential and commercial property in Moreno Valley, and believe that the MVTC warehouse project will benefit the city and its residents. It also will provide much needed tax revenue for road improvements, police, fire, schools, parks, and other community projects. I urge the city council to approve the project.

Thank you.
-Jason Lo
213-245-1672
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2673 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Katherine Bailey Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:17:48 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Katherine Bailey
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2674 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Roy Latap Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:22:55 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Roy Latap
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2675 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rainier Dione Rodriguez Latap Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:22:57 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rainier Dione Rodriguez Latap
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2676 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: Ulises Cabrera; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez Cc: City Clerk; Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Moreno Valley Business Center and Moreno Valley Trade Center Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:33:09 PM
Attachments: MVBC Findings for Project Denial.docx
MVTC Findings for Project Denial.docx
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Mayor and Council Members,
There are so many conflicts with the two warehouse projects being considered at tonight's meeting of the City Council. Nether project should be approved for development as outlined in my previous letters. You will likely hear from a variety of residents this evening and hopefully you will be able to come to a consensus and deny each project. Additionally, both projects fail to make the findings necessary for a general plan amendment or a plot plan approvel. Attached you will find a full collection of Finding for Denial of Moreno Valley Business Center and Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Hope they are helpful.

Tom Thornsley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2677 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Moreno Valley Business Center
Finding for Denial of Plot Plan (PEN21-0079) presented in Appeals (PAA22-0002 AND PAA22- 0003)
There are certain basic rules that either prohibit the City from approving a project or require it to approve a project. The most common ones are summarized below: City cannot legally approve any project if:
• Environmental documents, studies and mitigation measures are not legally adequate • Project is not consistent with General Plan
• Land is not properly zoned for the proposed use

9.02.040 General plan amendments.

F. Required Findings. Amendment to the text or maps of the general plan may be made if:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the general plan;
This project is not consistent with the prescribed land use.

List of GP Goal, Policies not met:

LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

The proposed warehouse distribution center further expands the same employment base and fails to provide the city with a balanced mixes of employment opportunities.

The proposed warehouse distribution center fails to expand employment opportunities beyond the multiple similar jobs options, thus not ensuring that a high quality of life can be maintained in Moreno Valley.

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality.

This project will continue to unbalance the levels of employment opportunities.

There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Without balanced levels of employment opportunities may F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2678 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Moreno Valley residents will be denied career field job locally, more employees will be driving to Moreno Valley for logistic jobs, both of which will not cut commute times or improve air quality.

General
POLICIES LCC.3-1: Insist on high-quality development that is sensitive to surrounding context throughout the city and particularly in centers and corridors.

Warehouses adjacent to residential are not sensitive to the surround context.

LCC.3-2: Use development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another.

This project fails to comply with the MoVal General Plan Building Massing and Design criteria by failing to address the visual dominance of a building proposed to be 48 or 100 feet tall as required when it is adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods.

Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

In the MoVal 2040 General Plan under Planning for a Pleasant, Healthy Noise Environment it says “separating and buffering noisy land uses, and designing for a quiet indoor environment will contribute to a healthy, livable neighborhood and a vibrant local economy.” Those residing in homes next to or near this warehouse project will be subjected to continuous background noise from outdoor on-site activities thus impacting the health and livable neighborhood that exists and diminishing the vibrant local economy – their residential property’s devaluation.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2679 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

Noise generation from the warehouse may fall below codified thresholds but sensitive receptors adjacent or near the noise sources will be subject to ongoing background noises 24/7 which can be considered disturbing and a nuisance during times of outdoor activity and at night. This project does not propose limited hours of operation thus this impact cannot be eliminated.

AIR QUALITY
EJ.1-D: Work with the distribution and warehousing business community to improve outdoor air quality through improved operations and practices, such as planning for zero emissions trucks and vans.

This project does not have guarantees that vehicles used with their operation will be zero emissions trucks and/or vans. Rebate programs are voluntary and this project needs mandatory compliance to meet this goal.

2. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare.

9.02.030 Development review process.

5. Findings. Following the noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 9.02.200 of this chapter and unless otherwise specified in this chapter, the planning commission shall make the following findings before approving a major development review application:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the general plan; This project fails to meet multiple goals, objectives, policies and programs of the general plan as detailed under project findings for the general plan as previously outlined above.
b. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this title; The placement of this warehouse fails to meet the basic criteria for establishing buffering uses between residential and light industrial as stated under the Light Industrial District “. This district requires buffering between residential districts and industrial and warehouse structures greater than fifty thousand (50,000) square feet in building area.” The complete text can be found below.

Municipal Code Development Standards
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2680 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park)

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

This project is not in compliance with the following:

9.02.030 Development review process.

B. Major Development Review Process.

1. Purpose and Intent. The major development review process is intended to implement general plan policies and other adopted policy and design standards, regulations and guidelines. To achieve quality development that is functionally as well as aesthetically enhancing to the community, and to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment, the purposes of major development review are to ensure the following:
a. That the location and configuration of structures developed within the city are visually harmonious with their sites and with natural landforms and surrounding sites, structures, and streetscapes;
The development of a 48 or 100 foot tall warehouse is not harmonious with the surrounding environment of neighboring residential development. d. That adverse environmental effects are minimized;
The environmental impacts are so significant that they cannot be mitigate for thus requesting that those impact be overridden due to benefits the project will F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2681 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) bring. This project offers not better benefits than multiple projects before it or the multitude of warehouse designated to be built on the World Logistics property. The best remedy to minimize the environmental effects is to deny the project.
f. That the materials, textures, colors and details of proposed construction are an appropriate expression of the design concept and function, and are, to the extent feasible, compatible with the adjacent and neighboring structures and functions; g. That development proposals do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other buildings or from public ways, or visually dominate their surroundings with respect to mass and scale, to an extent inappropriate to their use; Should be denied because the scale of the warehouse does most definitely block scenic views in all manors and will visually dominate their surrounding changing the character of the existing community.
k. That excellence in architectural design is maintained in order to enhance the visual environmental of the city and to protect the economic value of existing structures; This project should be denied because even the modest architectural elements cannot shield the sheer size and mass of the warehouse which is not enough to enhance the visual environment. Conflicting uses such as a warehouse next to residential hurts the economic value of neighboring structures which in this case are residents’ homes.
m. That the public health, safety and general welfare are protected; This project fails to meet these criteria with the unmitigatable impacts to air, greenhouse gases, visual blight, increased truck traffic levels all diminishing the general welfare of the neighborhood and the community.
n. That development plans comply with applicable policies, standards, ordinances and design guidelines.

This project proposal does not comply with a number of the applicable policies and standards outlined in MoVal 2040 General plan as discussed here-in.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2682 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park
Finding for Denial of General Plan Amendment (PEN19-0191), Tentative Parcel Map (PEN19- 0234), and Plot Plan (PEN19-0193)
There are certain basic rules that either prohibit the City from approving a project or require it to approve a project. The most common ones are summarized below: City cannot legally approve any project if:
• Environmental documents, studies and mitigation measures are not legally adequate • Project is not consistent with General Plan
• Land is not properly zoned for the proposed use

9.02.040 General plan amendments.

F. Required Findings. Amendment to the text or maps of the general plan may be made if:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with existing goals, objectives, policies and programs of the general plan;
This project is not consistent with the prescribed land use.

List of GP Goal, Policies not met:

LCC.1-1: Foster a balanced mix of employment, housing, educational, entertainment, and recreational uses throughout the city to support a complete community.

The proposed warehouse distribution center further expands the same employment base and fails to provide the city with a balanced mixes of employment opportunities.

POLICIES
LCC.1-12: Balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for Moreno Valley residents to work locally, cut commute times, and improve air quality.

This project will continue to unbalance the levels of employment opportunities.

There is already a surplus of logistic jobs in the city and the WLC expects to add 20,000 more. Without balanced levels of employment opportunities may F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2683 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Moreno Valley residents will be denied career field job locally, more employees will be driving to Moreno Valley for logistic jobs, both of which will not cut commute times or improve air quality.

General
POLICIES LCC.3-1: Insist on high-quality development that is sensitive to surrounding context throughout the city and particularly in centers and corridors.

Warehouses adjacent to residential are not sensitive to the surround context.

Goal N-1: Design for a pleasant, healthy sound environment conducive to living and working.

POLICIES
N.1-2: Guide the location and design of transportation facilities, industrial uses, and other potential noise generators to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

N.1-6: Require noise buffering, dampening, or active cancellation, on rooftop or other outdoor mechanical equipment located near residences, parks, and other noise sensitive land uses.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2684 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Goal N-2: Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on the quality of life in the community.

2. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare.

9.02.030 Development review process.

Municipal Code Development Standards
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2685 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park)

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

This project is not in compliance with the following:

9.02.030 Development review process.

B. Major Development Review Process.

g. That development proposals do not unnecessarily block scenic views from other buildings or from public ways, or visually dominate their surroundings with respect to mass and scale, to an extent inappropriate to their use; Should be denied because the scale of the warehouse does most definitely block scenic views in all manors and will visually dominate their surrounding changing the character of the existing community.
k. That excellence in architectural design is maintained in order to enhance the visual environmental of the city and to protect the economic value of existing structures; This project should be denied because even the modest architectural elements cannot shield the sheer size and mass of the warehouse which is not enough to enhance the visual environment. Conflicting uses such as a warehouse next to residential hurts the economic value of neighboring structures which in this case are residents’ homes.
m. That the public health, safety and general welfare are protected; This project fails to meet these criteria with the unmitigatable impacts to air, greenhouse gases, visual blight, increased truck traffic levels all diminishing the general welfare of the neighborhood and the community.
n. That development plans comply with applicable policies, standards, ordinances and design guidelines.

This project proposal does not comply with a number of the applicable policies and standards outlined in MoVal 2040 General plan as discussed here-in.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2687 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: jason smith Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:54:55 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter. jason smith
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2688 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Janet Velasco Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:54:55 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Janet Velasco
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2689 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Dennise Jimenez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 1:04:50 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dennise Jimenez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2690 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lindsay Robinson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:09 PM
Subject: MV Trade center concerns
To: David Marquez <[email protected]>, Ulises Cabrera <[email protected]>, Edward A. Delgado <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> To whom it may concern,
Please accept my attached document regarding my opposition to the MV Trade center that is being brought forward again.

This project does not belong next to our homes and needs to be denied.

Thank you.

Lindsay Robinson
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2691 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Antonio mejia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 1:30:19 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Antonio mejia
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2692 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Dennis Leon Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 1:35:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Dennis Leon
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2693 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cristina Rivera Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 1:56:06 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cristina Rivera
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2694 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Consuelo Gutierrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:01:28 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Consuelo Gutierrez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2695 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jessica Lopez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:06:58 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jessica Lopez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2696 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Marina Fernandez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:07:00 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Marina Fernandez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2697 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Lindsay Robinson
To: David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Sean P. Kelleher; Gabriel Diaz
Cc: Jane Halstead
Subject: Fwd: MV Trade center concerns
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:21:48 PM
Attachments: June 14 MV Trade Center.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear council and staff,
My original concerns regarding the trade center still apply and are attached for your enjoyment. Please enter the attached in the record opposing the trade center.

I am also including some quotes from Mr. Gutierrez that appeared in the Press Enterprise so let's see if he really listens and cares about what the residents want. The additional "bribe" of a sports complex in another district does not outweigh the damage that will be done to the health and quality of life of the residents should you approve this abomination.

By Jeff Horseman | [email protected] | The Press-Enterprise PUBLISHED: April 29, 2022 at 2:28 p.m. | UPDATED: June 20, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.

Gutierrez:
...“I would always look at issues (as supervisor) independently and objectively and I would make sure the people are listened to,” he added.
“Any time we look at an individual (development) project (we should) look at it from a social justice lens in terms of how can we benefit that community that’s being impacted,” Gutierrez said.

By Jeff Horseman | [email protected] | The Press-Enterprise PUBLISHED: October 8, 2022 at 7:00 a.m. | UPDATED: October 8, 2022 at 7:00 a.m.

What are your thoughts on the county’s logistics industry? Should the county continue to add warehouses? If not, what ideas do you have for adding jobs in a county that lags behind its neighbors in education and income?
Gutierrez: I understand the concerns many Riverside County residents have about warehouses and their impacts on traffic and the environment. In general, if the community around a potential warehouse site doesn’t want a warehouse built, then we need to listen to that community.

Thank you,
Lindsay Robinson
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2698 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lindsay Robinson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:09 PM
Subject: MV Trade center concerns
To: David Marquez <[email protected]>, Ulises Cabrera <[email protected]>, Edward A. Delgado <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> To whom it may concern,
Please accept my attached document regarding my opposition to the MV Trade center that is being brought forward again.

This project does not belong next to our homes and needs to be denied.

Thank you.

Lindsay Robinson
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2699 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) June 14, 2022
Moreno Valley Trade Center Round 2
To whom it may concern,
Please enter this into the Moreno Valley Trade Center Packet along with the additional documents as the previous concerns still apply.

I still believe that the mayor was allowed to act inappropriately when he tabled the discussion prior to voting when he saw he was not going to get his way.

The developer lied when he said that our school superintendent Kedzoira provided a letter of support for the project. Many of us were in disbelief and Mr. Kedzoira confirmed that he did NOT support this project or other warehouses. He thanked them for their donation (bribe) to the school wellness center. This should remind you all of the felony conviction Alex Ramirez received for the fraudulent letters of support for the Ironwood Village project. Superintendent Kedzoira is very well respected and this lie tarnished his reputation for many people and a public apology is warranted. The magnitude of this lie should be reason enough to vote no and black list Hillwood from the city.

Mr. Gutierrez sent out many glossy mailers as well as inundated residents with campaign calls. One such call stated that he does not approve of warehouses near homes/residential areas. That’s great news for the residents as it means he will not approve this project.

Campaign mailers from most of you all say you’re going to bring better businesses and high paying jobs yet what we see are warehouses, gas stations and fast food. Once elected the promises fade away. Let’s start honoring your promises and bring those high paying jobs and better businesses. Moreno Valley could be so much more than what it’s been doomed to.

Our General Plan Update has recently been completed and rezoning projects should not be coming forward to soon especially one as hypocritical as this that takes residential land away. The city’s excuse for destroying the community character of the NE by letting Chung rezone R2 to R10 was that we needed more homes to meet state mandates therefore residential land should not be rezoned to warehouses.

Why hasn’t Hillwood said where the residential R2 PAKO homes will be relocated as required by law?
Hillwood’s presentation admitted they have no tenant thus all of the estimates could be way off regarding traffic, noise, pollution. It’s a spec building and thus needs to be denied.

Have any of you sat and watched trucks navigating Benzeevi’s absurd roundabout? It was clearly not designed for large trucks so now more trucks are heading west thru the auto mall to Moreno Beach which could be a violation of the Prologis agreement that all F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2700 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) trucks go east to Redlands. This roundabout will not be able to handle trucks from this project as well as wlc so where will these trucks illegally drive? We aren’t getting sufficient truck enforcement nor traffic patrols in the east end as it is.

Has our municipal code for noise been amended yet to require warehouses shut down from 10 pm to 7 am if they’re next to homes? If not, this project needs to be denied.

This project’s EIR has too many significant negative impacts that severely harm the residents’ health and quality of life. For too long the city flippantly over rides these severe impacts. There are laws that are supposed to protect us from these travesties.

For too long now the city staff have wantonly used the “override” to approve too many projects with significant negative impacts in a manner that I believe is illegal. For too long, staff have incorrectly asserted that the City may simply adopt a statement of override when a project results in impacts.

5.1 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF

THE PROJECT IS

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2701 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) o Aesthetics: Implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block views of Reche Canyon and the Badlands (and the San Bernardino Mountains beyond) from the segment of Encelia Avenue that abuts the Project site on the south (west of Shubert Street). Also, implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block scenic views of Mount Russell and its foothills from the segment of Eucalyptus Avenue that abuts the Project site. This would be a significant and unavoidable direct impact.
o Air Quality (Air Quality Management Plan Conflict): The Project would emit air pollutants (NOX) that would contribute to a delay in the attainment of federal and State ozone standards in the SCAB. Because the Project requires a General Plan Amendment, it also would exceed the growth projections contained in SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. As such, the Project would conflict with and could obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Project impacts due to a conflict with the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP would be significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulativelyconsiderable basis. o Air Quality (Criteria Pollutant Emissions): After the application of Project design features, mandatory regulatory requirements, and feasible mitigation measures, Project-related NOX emissions during long-term operation of the Project would remain above the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds. Accordingly, Project-related emissions would not meet SCAQMD air quality standards and contribute to the non-attainment of ozone standards in the SCAB. Therefore, Project operational-related impacts due to NOX emissions would be significant and unavoidable on a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis. o Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG Emissions Generation): Project-related GHG emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold for GHG emissions and would result in a cumulatively-considerable impact to the environment." (page 5-1 in MVTC Final EIR) The wlc is 10% of our city’s land due to Benzeevi’s ability to buy off our former council/pc members. Any future warehouses need to be placed on wlc land and not next to homes. Let Hillwood negotiate with Benzeevi to place his warehouse there perhaps next to Alessandro that they wish to pave. Other warehouses near homes have already been approved. Please ask how much total land is now warehouses in our city and say enough is enough. None of you would enjoy living next to a warehouse so don’t inflict this on the established residents. Other cities have imposed moratoriums on warehouses and it’s time Moreno Valley does the same. Put the residents health and quality of life first!
Dear Council members,
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2702 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Please respect the residents and the planning commission decision and vote NO on the Moreno Valley Trade Center. The 2006 general plan as well as the current mayor appointed planning commission realized that warehouses do not belong next to our residential homes.

This area of Moreno Valley was renamed to Rancho Belago and it was touted as the "Beverly Hills" of Moreno Valley complete with matching signs. Unfortunately thru less than ethical processes the warehouses to the east of these homes were approved. These residents do not deserve to now be surrounded on two sides with warehouses and 24/7 noise, traffic, light and air pollution.

The Hillwood presentation tries to depict a rosy picture but the reality is that the warehouse does not belong there. They have no tenant so all the data on traffic and noise they are providing is irrelevant.

Redlands south of Eucalyptus is not a truck route yet they have a truck entrance near the south end of the building near Encelia. There is no proposal to change the truck route, so they will be breaking the law.

An incredible amount of traffic will be using Encelia to exit the project during shift changes yet no street light was proposed. If it becomes an Amazon distribution center their vehicles will be invading the residential streets to reach Redlands.

Some of the houses will receive air filtration systems therefore they acknowledge the severe negative impact of their pollution. If air filtration is needed in the homes how will they protect the kids/adults who are playing and working outside? A yes vote means you really don't care about the health of the residents.

This project has a long list of money they're "donating" to different causes. Sure looks like Pay to Play if not bribery.

Unless there is a point of sale, the revenue the city may get is not worth the damage they will do.

Jobs- there will be many more jobs associated with building the 148 homes and more long term jobs. 148 homes will need upgrades, repairs, landscape maintenance etc for many years to come and will employ a large variety of tradesmen.

This warehouse hopes to remove approximately 148 half acre principal animal keeping homes at a time when the city claims we need more homes. The pandemic has shown us that people and especially children need space and yards to play thus the R2 PAKO zoning must remain especially as your new GPU allowed Nelson Chung to rezone our R2 PAKO land north of the freeway to his preferred R10 (Pay to Play goes full circle).

The Hillwood presentation talked about moving the 148 PAKO homes to another area but did not say where. It's my understanding they are supposed to show the new location for the displaced residential land. Where else in the city will they put those homes? F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2703 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Noise- the city needs to amend their municipal noise ordinances to include warehouse noise.

Warehouses in or near residential homes need to cease operation from 10 pm to 7 am. Just as loud parties, construction, yard equipment noise is restricted so must the warehouse noise. A perfect example is the horribly designed paper company building that the city approved that disrupts sleep and forces residents to keep their doors and windows shut all day to avoid the obnoxious droning. Would any of you want to have a generator running in your front yard all night? I don't think so and the excuse that it's "within acceptable limits" is absurd. None of you would find it acceptable so don't force it on us. Beeping trucks all night long is also disruptive and needs to cease.

One of the items they bragged about was paving Alessandro thru the wlc property- something Mr. Benzeevi is responsible for and won't help the city since Mr. Benzeevi intends to close Alessandro east of Merwin thru his property and the city signed off on it. Cactus will become the through street.

This warehouse appeared as a done deal on the maps shown during the public GPU meeting. An astute resident noticed it as the project had not come forward yet. The GPU consultant stated that city staff informed him it was already approved. So once again the city promoted a project that had not come before them yet just as was done years ago for wlc.

There is not sufficient data regarding the compounding effect that residents will suffer if both the wlc and the trade center are developed. The wlc will be bad enough, don't compound it. Vote NO on the mv trade center.

The 2006 general plan and the current planning commissioners did the right thing. They protected the residents from a warehouse next to their homes. They chose to value the residents’ health and quality of life over a quick profit for a developer.

People choose to live in areas that suit their interests and income levels. No one I've met chooses to live next to a warehouse and no city should rezone residential property near existing homes to warehouses. The city has made many horrible decisions with regard to warehouses don't let this be one of them.

I doubt any of you (council, staff, and developers) live next to a warehouse nor would you choose to do so. The negative impacts are too detrimental and can't be mitigated so please vote NO on the MV Trade Center- wrong location and it’s your responsibility to make the residents’ health and quality of life a priority!
Thank you,
Lindsay Robinson
Moreno Valley Trade Center dEIR concerns
To whom it may (or may not) concern,
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2704 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Please include this in the public record to voice my concerns on the inadequacy of the draft EIR related to the Moreno Valley Trade Center proposed at a location on Redlands Blvd. south of Eucalyptus.

As with the other warehouse projects, the city staff and developers make light of the significant negative impacts that can’t be mitigated and they unethically continue to override them without adequately addressing the cumulative effect of all the previous projects who also had their significant negative impacts unmitigated (pollution, noise, traffic etc.). Some of these projects that directly affect the residents south of Encelia include the wlc, Aldi, Prologis warehouses and the sleep disrupting Solaris paper company and now commercial zoning just north of them. The developers and staff that promote these obscene projects do not live here and leave us to suffer the consequences of their bad decisions and yes outright false data in order to get their projects approved.

Many at city hall have forgotten who they work for- it’s the residents not the developers and our health and quality of life should be their priority, not the financial enrichment of developers. Would the city staff and developers want this to happen where they livehave their views blocked, breathe bad air, have non-stop truck traffic 24/7 disrupting their sleep with beeping and brakes noise etc.? People moved out here for the larger lots, animal keeping, quiet, night skies, low crime to name a few. We poured our life savings into purchasing our homes in an area we researched and thought was the right place for our families. Warehouses were never intended out here and especially the encroachment into residential areas as the MV Trade Center intends to do. The 2006 comprehensive general plan protected the residents, the new plan does not.

This project was already included on the general plan update as a done deal. It was on the map and consultant thought it was already approved. How did that happen when it hadn’t even come forward yet? Again underhanded action at city hall just like when the city promoted the wlc prematurely. This warehouse does not belong here and needs to be eliminated.

The land that this abomination intends to rezone is resident R2 with animal keeping rights. The city keeps whining about losing control if they don’t meet certain housing numbers yet they want to remove residential land in favor of another warehouse. They just allowed Chung/Benzeevi committee to remove more animal keeping residential land so we need to preserve what is left. The city needs to stop contradicting themselves and using RHNA when it suits them. DO NOT ALLOW THIS LOSS OF

RESIDENTIAL LAND FOR ANOTHER WAREHOUSE ENCROACHING INTO AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD!
Their traffic studies and analysis contain many areas that need to be addressed more completely and false data/info removed. Encelia is not a high traffic street and is not a truck route and should never become one. Why have the traffic numbers been F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2705 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) inflated for Encelia to make it seem like all the project driveways won’t impact the residents??
This project intends to direct a huge amount of traffic onto a quiet street and onto Redlands. Redlands Blvd south of Eucalyptus is NOT a truck route although large numbers of trucks break the law daily.

This study seems to assume that Encelia and Redlands will be ok for their trucks when they are not truck routes. Why hasn’t this study adequately addressed the illegal trucks using Redlands Blvd south of Eucalyptus? Will this project pay for additional police patrols to stop the illegal truck traffic? The trucks going south on Redlands to Cactus will have severe negative impacts on the other housing tracks along Redlands and Cactus so why isn’t this addressed satisfactorily? These large trucks also destroy our roads much quicker than passenger vehicleswill this project (and wlc) be held accountable in paying for the damage to our roads? It has been mentioned that this will be another Amazon distribution center, if so is their adequate parking and law enforcement for all their small delivery trucks? We have Amazon in our city already and do not need another. Their drivers are dangerous and invade neighborhoods parking their vehicles off the premises. Again, all these neighborhoods will suffer compounded health and quality life issues associated with adding another warehouse to their already affected community.

Will this project finance the additional police we will need to protect our residents from all these negative impacts associated with our residential road use? Employee traffic- we all know that people look for quicker routes to and from their destinations. How will you protect the existing residents from excessive employee/truck traffic through their quiet neighborhoods? Non-residential traffic is much more dangerous than residential. How will you stop employees from parking in our residential neighborhoods? Where are the safe guards and the nonresidential traffic noise, dangerous driving, pollution needs to be addressed not over ridden.

Why have the safe equestrian trails been eliminated from this study? Our master planned trail system includes a safe equestrian overpass at Theodore and it should be down Redlands (and Theodore) to connect with Lake Perris. Only pedestrian and bikes get mentioned.

Aesthetics-The 2006 general plan included many more protections to our residents that this project will destroy. The wlc high cube warehouses will obstruct the resident’s wonderful views to the east and now this project will obstruct their views to the north.

Just another severe negative impact that is compounded by other projects that have already been approved. Loss of the substantial views to east is bad enough so do not allow this project to obstruct their remaining views. Why isn’t the city protecting the residents better rather than over riding this compounded severe negative impact? F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2706 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Pollution- the city and out of town developers continue to play Russian roulette with our health by approving unlimited warehouses to encroach into our residential areas. There are so many studies already done that show the damage done to our lungs from diesel and other fuels- especially the young and seniors. Why didn’t this EIR address the NOx pollution that will be associated with the project operation? Along with air pollution there will be substantial noise and light pollution 24/7 that are not adequately addressed- will the truck noise and lights be stopped at 10 pm as other activities need to? Will the city finally address this issue and amend our noise ordinance to include warehouses in residential areas? The beeping trucks at skechers all night have disrupted sleep of those who live north of it and since it opened they haven’t been able to sleep with their windows open. Since the paper company opened the noise has disrupted both daytime and night time sleep and that should not be allowed to occur with any more warehouses. Why hasn’t the compounded effect been addressed adequately to include the injustice that this neighborhood will suffer from with the already approved wlc? Do NOT claim it doesn’t need to be addressed!
Water- I don’t believe that the EMWD is being truthful on being able to supply water to all these projects coming forward- wlc and the commercial north of the freeway will suck up so much water. I was appalled to read that they will dig a well for their project and suck out the aquifers which aren’t getting adequately replenished during so many years of drought. The Festival also dug a well recently and will also be taking aquifer water.

We have residents whose property relies on well water that these projects may deplete.

Where are the safeguards for these residents? Why was there no research and data collected on what happens when excessive underground water is removed? How much water will they be pumping from their well? When the underground water is pumped out, the ground will settle and homes could start sinking and sink holes could develop on our roads. Will this project be responsible later down the road for all the damage they’ve done? This well pumping by warehouses should NOT be allowed and certainly without safe guards and restrictions.

Jobs- once again the promise of jobs is bandied about to entice people to like this project. The 2006 and 2021 general plans as well as city propaganda every year promise to bring high paying jobs to Moreno Valley so people don’t have to commute.

Warehouses do not bring those high paying jobs promised. This project like the wlc will swallow up in huge amount of valuable land for a small number of jobs that are not high paying. What guarantee is there that there will be 2000 permanent high paying jobs? Why hasn’t the city learned from past lies from developers in order to get their project approved (skechers/benzeevi promised thousands and did not deliver)? Warehouses and even trucks are becoming more automated, therefore less jobs and most are temporary. Why do you keep bringing up the commuting issue when it’s been shown that our resident commute times are on average or less than surrounding communities? In fact the majority of city staff commute into Moreno Valley to work so it is a non-issue intended to instill fear. Why does the city staff F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2707 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) continue to condemn our residents to low paying warehouse jobs? We deserve better.

Not so — procedurally, the lead agency can only approve a project with significant environmental impacts if: (1) the adverse environmental effects of a project have been substantially mitigated, or (2) mitigation measures or alternatives are infeasible and overriding considerations exist which allow approval of the project. (PRC § 21081; Guideline §§ 15091, 15093.)
Overriding considerations do not come into play unless there are no feasible project alternatives. (City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, 2006, 39 Cal.4th 341,368.) The lead agency, therefore, cannot merely adopt a statement of overriding considerations and approve a project with significant impacts; it must first adopt feasible alternatives and mitigation measures. “CEQA does not authorize an agency to proceed with a project that will have significant, unmitigated effects on the environment, based simply on a weighing of those effects against the project’s benefits, unless the measures necessary to mitigate those effects are truly infeasible. (Id. at 376.)
Now with CEQA in play, the city/developer try to claim that rejecting the project and leaving the zoning as is will result in the same if not more severe negative impacts that just leave me speechless. With RHNA in play we need these residential homesespecially as the pandemic has shown kids and adults need larger yards to play in to remain safely distanced. Our large lot neighborhood home sell quickly and are in demand so we need to keep our R2 designation. The NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE is the correct selection and the MV TRADE CENTER needs to be denied.

Our city has been overwhelmed by warehouses and at this point there needs to be a moratorium. No more warehouses and we need more open space per the law. The compounded effects are real and dangerous and should no longer be ignored.

As residents we don’t have investor money to afford legal services and PR staff the way developers do. Our hard earned money went into purchasing our homes in a place chosen that suited our life styles. We moved further out of town to larger lots, space, low crime, night skies, views etc. and trusted that our city government would actually work to protect us as city governments were set up to do. Staff and elected officials take ethics training and oaths of office to do so. Unfortunately developer money has completely corrupted our system of government and the residents have not been protected. Rejection of the Moreno Valley Trade Center will be the start to reverse prior environmental injustices inflicted on the tax paying residents of Moreno Valley.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2708 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Thank you,
Lindsay Robinson
Resident of Moreno Valley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2709 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center appeal @ city Council Meeting tonight Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:25:21 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
I am unable to attend the meeting to tonight so I wanted to be sure my comments are seen and considered for this hearing.

I urge you to uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation to not approve this project. It is not the right location for this project and is not consistent with our recently completed general plan that had extensive input. As the planning commission also said there is already a huge area in the general plan zoned for this type of project that has had almost nothing built yet (the World Logistics Center). The WLC area is a huge area already zoned for this type of building nearby and is not as close to homes and does not require a rezoning.

To summarize my more detailed comments below, the Moreno Valley Trade Center project is right across a small street from existing homes, severely impacts the viewshed of these homes (they would have a view of a towering 35 foot berm), will still have noise impacts (loading docks and lots of trucks just on the other side of the berm), and air pollution effects that are not mitigated to non-significance, and will add more truck traffic and employee vehicle traffic to a very small traffic circle and overpass on Redlands Blvd. The number of trucks is extremely high for this facility. And while this project would provide construction jobs that are temporary, the homes zoned for this area would also provide future construction jobs for much needed housing in the city, or could provide construction jobs if built in an area zoned for this type of facility.

The project at first may sound as if it has been scaled back to reduce impacts from the project since the Planning Commission recommended against it, most of the changes are minor and still result in several significant impacts as before.

The reduction in the size of the building is minor as the square footage is only reduced by less than 5 % from the previous proposed size.

The number of truck loading docks will only reduced by 4 out of a total of 117 on the south side of the building closest to the homes - that is still 113 loading docks on the south side nearest homes! And another 90 loading docks (instead of 97) on the north side. 203 loading docks total still at this building! That is a lot of loading docks and would not be a significant change to the amount of noise and air pollution coming from this activity. And another 228 tractor trailer parking spaces besides the loading docks. That is a lot of trucks in a relatively small area right next to existing homes! The visual impact is changed but not reduced. Instead of the current scenic vistas, the existing homes houses will have a view of a 35 foot berm right along Encelia Avenue just feet from the homes and way taller than the one story homes there. This berm will block a view of the building more but still remove any vistas they now have. And none of the changes will reduce pollution impacts as the truck numbers are high, loading docks are still nearby on the south side of the building and trucks will idle, travel and park just on the other side of the berm from the homes.

While this project appears to remove previous traffic impacts to Encelia Avenue itself, there will still be more trucks in the area that will pollute the air, damage roads, continue to run over curbs at the too small roundabout and impact the too small overpass and ramps at Redlands Blvd with no proposal to improve the overpass anytime soon. There will be a high volume of employee cars also added to Redlands Blvd. as well as a traffic signal added on Redlands Blvd. between Encelia and Eucalyptus. Redlands Blvd. at certain times of day is very busy already. I thought the traffic circle was to help improve traffic flow but the signal then added seems to counteract that attempt. And traffic over the overpass already backs up at F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2710 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) certain times of day.

As far as providing construction jobs, the homes that were zoned for the area would also provide construction jobs and there is a very high demand for more housing.

The city is also proposing more homes just to the southwest of this trade center according to the general plan and those potential residents have no say in this proposal since it has not been developed yet and would impact them as well especially from noise and air pollution.

This project is also right next to the Prologis Development on Eucalyptus that was made to revise their proposal to keep large buildings away from the homes that are now going to be impacted by this proposal. How is it right to have that developer revise their project to keep it further from the homes and now put a bigger building even closer to those same homes? This is also another change to the very new general plan that was supposed to be a vision for the city for many years to come. What is the point of all of the work that went into the general plan to turn around and immediately change it? As the planning commission pointed out this is not the right place for this project and there is already a nearby very large area approved in the current general plan for this type of project.

Please do not approve this project at this location.

Melody Lardner
34 year resident of Moreno Valley
I am unable to
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2711 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tracy Hodge
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Public Hearing re: PEN19-0191 INITIAL STUDY FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER PROJECT Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:36:05 PM
Attachments: INITIAL STUDY FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER PROJECT.pdf Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Mr. Kelleher,
This email is to reject the project proposed for the project location:

South of Eucalyptus Avenue, North of Encelia Avenue, East of Quincy Street and West of Redlands Boulevard.

Based on the Initial Study for this project, there is nothing that should be acceptable about this project due to the numerous items that will significantly impact our community.

Without significant drainage upgrades to the entire east end of the community, this project will directly impact the runnoff into our residential community causing increased flooding to our residential neighborhood.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2712 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) The site map also included shows there will be truck docks on the south side of the building that will inherently allow trucks to use and access the building by using the residential street Encelia Ave. This road connecting at Redlands Blvd. was never designed for truck traffic let alone high volume vehicle traffic.

Also, what will keep all the business traffic from using the residential neighborhood as their main streets to enter and exit their facility?
It is strongly requested that should this building be allowed I will petition for no business access for any vehicles along Encelia. We will also petition that our entire community have all new drainage, landscape improvements with F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2713 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) NO portion of the DIF to be paid by the stakeholders of Moreno Valley.

Truck Traffic on the 60 Freeway will drastically impact our community.

Tracy Hodge
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2714 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Eric Weaver Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:39:11 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Eric Weaver
92552
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2715 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rohan Saini Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:39:15 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rohan Saini
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2716 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Marx Garcia Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:43:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Marx Garcia
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2717 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jim Hois Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:43:47 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jim Hois
15243
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2718 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Andrea Matey Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:43:48 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Andrea Matey
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2719 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Angelita Talamantez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:53:38 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Angelita Talamantez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2720 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: brooke hall
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: SUPPORT THE Moreno Valley Trade Center (warehouse) Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:07:21 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello Sean Kelleher,
I am appealing to the Moreno Valley council to support the new Moreno Valley Trade Center. I believe it will be extremely beneficial to our community. Some of the many benefits include increased revenue for the city, an influx in job supply, more jobs created for the police and fire department.

This facility will also increase property value, provide increased tax revenue for better roads, and bring more commerce to our local businesses. We as a community can use these new jobs and revenue especially in the current economic climate.

I am a strong advocate for this project and believe in its positive impact.

Thank you,
Brooke Victoria
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2721 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Anthony Galvan Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:09:08 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Anthony Galvan
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2722 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Patricia Gutierrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:09:09 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Patricia Gutierrez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2723 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Mashawnna Dailey Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:09:10 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Mashawnna Dailey
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2724 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Rosendo Miranda Jr Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:09:10 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Rosendo Miranda Jr
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2725 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Elizabeth Cordero Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:09:12 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Elizabeth Cordero
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2726 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ray Espinoza Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:14:35 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ray Espinoza
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2727 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jose Cordero Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:14:36 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jose Cordero
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2728 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Paul Quach Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:14:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Paul Quach
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2729 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Gregory Paiva
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Ezri Vargas; Julia Descoteaux; James Verdugo, CBO, Certified Access Specialist (CASp #624) Cc: Manuel A. Mancha; Michael Lloyd, P.E.; Brian Mohan
Subject: RE: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:15:34 PM
Attachments: image004.png
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Absolutely. The best way to get ahold of me is via cell phone (951)522-8917.

Here is the information received from the Department of Cannabis Control:
“Lastly, I understand Teresa let you know that we are still waiting for a response from the local jurisdiction. Did the city happen to get to back to you at all? Our local jurisdiction group sent the city another request to respond on September 28 but still no response from them.” Feel free to send the edits through the portal or email them directly to me.

Thank you again for these quick clarifications.

Natasha Velasquez
Licensing Analyst
844-61-CA-DCC (844-612-2322)
[email protected]
www.cannabis.ca.gov
Thank you gain and I look forward to working with all of you.

Gregory Paiva │ Compliance Manager
2151 E. Convention Center Way, Suite 235│Ontario│CA 91764 Main 909.292.6723 Ext. 6723
Cell 951-522-8917
[email protected]
**Electronic Privacy Notice** This e-mail and any attachments contain information that is or may be covered by electronic communication privacy laws and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then immediately delete it. Thank you for your cooperation.

From: Sean P. Kelleher <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:10 PM
To: Ezri Vargas <[email protected]>; Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; James Verdugo, CBO, Certified Access Specialist (CASp #624) <[email protected]>
Cc: Manuel A. Mancha <[email protected]>; Michael Lloyd, P.E. <[email protected]>; Gregory Paiva <[email protected]>; Brian Mohan <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Greg,
Can you please share your number with us as well?
Thank you,
Sean
Sean P. Kelleher
Planning Division Manager/Planning Official
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3215 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2730 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) NOTICE
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED.

THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL, AND MAY BE EXEMPT OR PROHIBITED FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

IF YOU RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, DO NOT FORWARD OR OTHERWISE SHARE THIS MESSAGE.

INSTEAD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND OUR OFFICE OF THE ERROR. -----Original Appointment-----
From: Sean P. Kelleher
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:50 AM
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Ezri Vargas; Julia Descoteaux; James Verdugo, CBO, Certified Access Specialist (CASp #624) Cc: Manuel A. Mancha; Michael Lloyd, P.E.; Gregory Paiva; Brian Mohan Subject: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 When: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Where: https://moval.zoom.us/j/84471312640
Hi there,
Sean P. Kelleher, Planning Division Manager is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Join Zoom Meeting
One tap mobile: US: +16692192599,,84471312640# or +16699006833,,84471312640# Meeting URL: https://moval.zoom.us/j/84471312640
Meeting ID: 844 7131 2640
Join by Telephone
For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location.

Dial:

US: +1 669 219 2599 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 Meeting ID: 844 7131 2640
International numbers
Skype for Business (Lync)
https://moval.zoom.us/skype/84471312640
_____________________________________________
From: Ezri Vargas <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:47 AM
To: Sean P. Kelleher <[email protected]>; Brian Mohan <[email protected]> Cc: Manuel A. Mancha <[email protected]>; Michael Lloyd, P.E. <[email protected]>; Gregory Paiva <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Thank you Sean
I am available anytime in the afternoon after 2
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2731 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) CC’ing our compliance manager Greg as well
From: Sean P. Kelleher <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Brian Mohan <[email protected]>; Ezri Vargas <[email protected]> Cc: Manuel A. Mancha <[email protected]>; Michael Lloyd, P.E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 Good Morning Ezri,
I am away from the office today but would be available for a call tomorrow. We are preparing the final conditions of approval based on the Planning Commissions’ action. Your next step will be to submit to the building and safety division for your proposed tenant improvements.

Thank you,
Sean
Sean P. Kelleher
Planning Division Manager/Planning Official
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3215 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
NOTICE
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED.

THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL, AND MAY BE EXEMPT OR PROHIBITED FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

IF YOU RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, DO NOT FORWARD OR OTHERWISE SHARE THIS MESSAGE.

INSTEAD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND OUR OFFICE OF THE ERROR.

From: Brian Mohan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Sean P. Kelleher <[email protected]>
Cc: Ezri Vargas <[email protected]>; Manuel A. Mancha <[email protected]>; Michael Lloyd, P.E. <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 Sean,
As the release and waiver is now signed (separate email), please respond to Ezri’s voicemail on next steps from Planning now that the appeal in nullified.

Brian
Brian Mohan
Assistant City Manager
Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
City Manager's Office
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3024 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA 92553
From: CX ServiceAccount <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 10:37 AM
To: Brian Mohan <[email protected]>
Subject: Voice Message from DAY MAIN MENU Tel: 9093548015 Sender's comments are located in WAV file at end of message.

CX ServiceAccount
e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2732 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Michelle
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: I am for the MVTC
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:15:57 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear council member
As a 25 year voting resident of Moreno Valley I strongly support the above project to vote yes.

The project will help our community in many ways without hindering us financially. The revenue will improve Moreno Valley such as a much need park and road ways located near the project.

This project will help with revenue for the support of our police, fire, schools, and other city employees.

I strongly support this and see only positive outcome from this project Sincerely
Michelle Hall
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2733 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Luis Gomez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:24:54 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Luis Gomez
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2734 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Roxana Palacios Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:24:55 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Roxana Palacios
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2735 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Paul Bradvica
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Cc: City Clerk Staff_DG
Subject: Dennis Leon | 714.299.0547
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:30:55 PM
Hi Sean,
The City Clerk’s Office received a call from Mr. Dennis Leon stating his support for the Moreno Valley Trade Center. The resident indicated he would like his support included in the public record.

Thank you,
Paul Bradvica
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor & City Council Offices
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3001 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2736 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Stephanie Diaz Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:39:45 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Stephanie Diaz
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2737 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Benito Marquez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:39:46 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Benito Marquez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2738 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Robert Torrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:11:04 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Robert Torrez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2739 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Oralia Sandoval Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:16:00 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Oralia Sandoval
92571
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2740 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Peggy
To: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Sean P.

Kelleher
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Agenda F.1 MVBC (Moreno Valley Business Center) Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:19:24 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Moreno Valley Mayor, City Councilmembers and Planning Commission Enough with the Warehouses! The proposed project MVBC F.1 set on the agenda at the 11/15/22 City Council Meeting tonight is too much. When and where will you STOP? There are locations that are appropriate and then there are locations that are NOT...this is NOT.

Seriously, do your job, think about the residents who live in this area and the residents who shop in this area and the many CARS that use Day St to get to the other side of town. Now think about the added traffic, especially semi-trucks, residents walking or riding their bikes, nearby schools and parks, pollution.

We were assured that all the warehouses in the east end and now on Heacock and Ironwood would not cause a problem, they would not be using our streets, such as Ironwood! We now know that was a lie.

Just yesterday while taking my kids to Box Springs Elementary School located on Athens Dr./Ironwood Ave; while waiting at the light, I counted eight Logistic semi-trucks pass by me like an endless caravan, heading toward Day St. and Box Springs. This was due to the stopped traffic on the west bound 60 fwy.

More and more out of area trucks and vehicles are discovering that Ironwood will keep them moving all the way to the end. The traffic in this city is relentless. Before the only semi-trucks you would see on Pigeon Pass/Ironwood was Staters Bros. or Home Depot...now we have all the idiots who don't want to sit on the congested 60. It's dangerous for the parents and kids trying to get to school.

Now you want to completely make Day St an area where residents will avoid and therefore also find somewhere else to spend their money. What about the nice new Hotels in that area have been slowly attracting visitors who need to stay nearby? Do you really think they want a view of warehouses, semitrucks, traffic, pollution? I think not.

The residents who live in that area, the ones who've waited years and years for road improvements, basic water service, waited for the area they live in to be cleaned up, crime and other undesirable things to improve...are going to get screwed again by sweet deals, by others who don't live there, who will dictate the outcome of their home equity. It's wrong on every level.

Please vote against this project. It's not enough to just change the general plan to fit deep pockets...to say it's okay, there's other warehouses in the area.

Peggy Holmes
36-year resident of Moreno Valley
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2741 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Deyjon Anderson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:59:09 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Deyjon Anderson
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2742 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Scarlett Navarrete Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 4:04:13 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Scarlett Navarrete
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2743 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ruben Alatorre Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 5:38:58 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ruben Alatorre
92571
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2744 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Eric Knox Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 2:38:48 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Eric Knox
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2745 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Emily Hernandez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 6:05:12 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Emily Hernandez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2746 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Leonardo Gonzalez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 6:17:29 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Leonardo Gonzalez
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2747 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Regina Lindsay Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 6:21:43 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Regina Lindsay
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2748 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Doaa Abdelaziz Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 6:56:24 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Doaa Abdelaziz
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2749 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jasmin Rivera
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Cc: City Clerk Staff_DG
Subject: FW: MVTC
Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 7:38:35 AM
FYI
Jasmin Rivera
Management Assistant
City Clerk's Office
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3037 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org 14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
-----Original Message-----
From: Corinne Orozco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:41 PM
To: City Council_DG <[email protected]>
Subject: MVTC
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE MVTC NOT GOOD FOR OUR COMMUNITY!!! PROFESSIONAL PLAZAS WILL EASILY CREATE MORE JOBS!
STOP THE POLLUTION, DONT MAKE MV AIR QUALITY EVEN WORSE! STOP THE INSANE TRAFFIC!!
STOP MOVING US OUT BECAUSE OF WAREHOUSES. MENIFEE AND BEAUMONT SAID NO AND THEIR COUNCIL LISTENED TO THEM.

YOU KNOW WHATS RIGHT.

AT LEAST THINK OF YOUR CHILDRENS FUTURE. PLEASE!!!
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2750 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Jose Aguayo Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 2:52:34 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Jose Aguayo
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2751 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Richard Gaston Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 6:48:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Richard Gaston
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2752 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Reginald Best III Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 6:57:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Reginald Best III
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2753 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: SANDRA WILLIAMS Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022 11:51:07 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

SANDRA WILLIAMS
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2754 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Ella Williamson Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Saturday, November 19, 2022 9:10:20 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Ella Williamson
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2755 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Henry Combs Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Saturday, November 19, 2022 1:36:57 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Henry Combs
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2756 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Hassan Gaffar Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Sunday, November 20, 2022 9:12:07 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Hassan Gaffar
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2757 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Kandie Rayne Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Sunday, November 20, 2022 12:24:54 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Kandie Rayne
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2758 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Kandie Raryne Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Sunday, November 20, 2022 12:29:45 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Kandie Raryne
928883
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2759 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: RL Jones
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Ulises Cabrera
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Warehouse approval
Date: Saturday, November 19, 2022 6:15:53 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
I have been a resident of Moreno Valley for over 36 years. The mushrooming of warehouses and insidious increase in semi traffic and resulting traffic congestion is disturbing to me. This has caused me to seriously consider moving out of the city.

Warehouses and their high semi traffic and resulting air pollution do not belong in or near houses or schools.

The city needs more employers and more than minimum wage or manual labor employment.

We don't need to have a reputation of one of the largest warehouse centers in the US but that's what it appears to me to be the mission of the city government this century.

Ruth Jones
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2760 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Alice Alvidrez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 4:31:15 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Alice Alvidrez
92555
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2761 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Michael Ramirez Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Friday, November 25, 2022 11:47:49 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Michael Ramirez
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2762 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Cheryl Smith Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Sunday, November 27, 2022 7:19:48 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Cheryl Smith
92557
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2763 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Prince Hall Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Sunday, November 27, 2022 7:48:00 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Prince Hall
92551
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2764 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; Planning Email_DG
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Candice Lee Says YES for Moreno Valley Trade Center! Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 9:31:07 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please Vote Yes for the Moreno Valley Trader Center project! I am a Moreno Valley resident who supports the Moreno Valley Trade Center! Additionally, I support the project because it:
• Creates 1,500 NEW jobs
• Creates a 18-acre sports and kids park
• Contributes $6.5 million for community services
• Creates new traffic signals, resort-caliber landscaping, and noise reducing barriers I want this to be read into the record at the city council meeting regarding this matter.

Candice Lee
92553
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2765 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Crystal Jimenez
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: No More Warehouses
Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 11:19:21 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning,
I’m writing this email to stand up for the families that will be affected from the two new warehouses that are planned to be constructed. We have enough warehouses. These families will have to live through the noise, the traffic, and diesel pollution/smell 23/7/365 days a year! I ask that you be considerate of these families. These people moved into a neighborhood they fell in love with and that could be taken from them. We want our Moreno Valley residents to feel comfortable when they’re at home, to have their peace and quiet and to be able to simply enjoy the comfort of their home which will be taken from them if the warehouses are built.

My name is Crystal Jimenez, I hope you can really take this email to heart and consider why it wouldn’t be a good idea to build warehouses.

Thank you,
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2766 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Darric
To: Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; Ulises Cabrera; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Sean P.

Kelleher; City Clerk; [email protected]
Cc: Alvaro Valdivia; Andre Moye; Antonio Hoggins; [email protected]; Brian Jackson; Carolyn Valencik; Ceci Yahoo; Charles Ober; Cindy Ramos; Crys Tom; DAMON FOREMAN; Darric Williams; David McAbee; Don McNicholas; Edna White; Ericka Partida; Eugene Wright; Jackie McGee; James Hagen; Jean Mims; Jeff Sims; Jesus Flores; John Hubbs; Jose Garcia; [email protected]; Karie Woodward; Ken Morin; [email protected]; Lisa Tuy; Liz Anderson; [email protected]; Margarita Valdivia; Maritza Torres; Mark & Donna Montgomery; Merrick; Nancy Altamirano; [email protected]; Pierre Overton; Ramona Zuniga Morales; Randy Thomas; Ray; Renee Smith; Richard Moreno; Richard White; [email protected]; Sharilyn Bankole; Shelly Mesa; Terry Scheschy; [email protected]; Tom and Terri Thornsley; VERONICA Ramos Subject: MVTC & 2nd Moreno Valley warehouse Moreno Valley Business Center (MVBC) on Tues. Dec 6th City Council agenda at 6 pm
Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 11:18:04 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers;
I am resending my previous statement with some additional information.

Please include these comments as part of the record for the above-mentioned public hearing. I am a resident of the Heritage Ranch community, the southern border of this proposed project.We again ask you to uphold the Planning Commission’s denial of entitlements for this project for the same reasons that were voiced on December 7, 2021, during the applicant's appeal of their decision. While it is true that the developer has reached out to me with some proposed changes that will eliminate the traffic exiting onto Encelia Ave., the environmental impact has not changed. There will still be the same amount of pollution in our neighborhood as described in the FEIR, the same truck and employee traffic congestion at the roundabout of Redlands and Eucalyptus, and the same property devaluation to our homes if this project is approved.

I believe that the people in the affected community should have the most credibility because we also represent the children to be affected by the decisions of people and interests that do not hold or care about the well-being of our community. The objective fact that we have to sit through 50+ paid shills of this MVTC political theatre is disappointing. There are always paid workers that claim to live amongst us or live in Moreno Valley at large to lobby for destructive and irreversible policy prescriptions for our neighborhood in the name of revenue and personal gain or greed. It is frustrating to listen to and deal with knowing those people who are for projects in our community do not live here. If the same questionable projects were dropped in their community they would disapprove. It is shocking to us that some of the things that people believe are "Good for Moreno Valley". Really? Good for who? These outside interests wanting and praising this project as a net positive for Moreno Valley do not live in this community. This is not a good project... If you approved this project then you will want to approve the Pilot Truck stop next... I would like to not assume that you care more about city revenue than the health and well-being of the people in your community.

F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2767 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Mr. Marquez, Cabrera, and Delgado, you were ready to vote no on December 7th after listening to us. The June 21, 2022 vote was conveniently postponed till Nov 15th right after the current elections. Again, please revisit the project's location and visualize the magnitude of a 1.3 million sq. ft. building and what it will do to our neighborhood.

The same sentiments are shared for the MVBC.

If these developers are offering $500,000 to the city to develop in areas that will cause irreparable harm to the community then there must be something that is innately wrong with the project. It does not fit in with this community and my children will pay the price for greed and power. You ran as Democrats that are supposed to care about the community and environment over corporate greed. But again objectively you are considering large warehouses that will not have many six-figure jobs and tons of low-wage jobs that are not making a liveable wage. Then you are going to consider a Pilot Truck stop dispensing "Gas" when it does not align with our all-electric future, besides the fact that we already have four gas stations in a two-square-mile area. I already own two electric vehicles. This behavior that is being tolerated does not fit in with our progressive agenda and typifies the corporate monster that is allowed to propagate itself in retrospect to what you ran on as politicians and supposed protectors of the community.

Reiterating the sad part is that we will rehash the sideshow of union workers claiming to be a part of our community that somehow we never see at our local meetings tell us how good this project is for Moreno Valley, to say nothing of how it will affect the immediate local residents. These actors are not in fact a part of our local community. They never talk about family, kids, traffic, noise, or air quality in the local community. They only talk about jobs. Low-paying warehouse jobs. Why is that? Because they do not live here off of Redlands. They have no interest in our concerns about why this project's location and proximity to our community is a net negative.

At the end of the day, I like business and growth... Just not at the expense of my home, children, and the overall well-being of our community. This project can exist... They just need to move it into the area that was already zoned for this... Move it off Theodore... --
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
Fax 810.963.0303
--
Darric V. Williams
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2768 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Cell 951.634.9143
Fax 810.963.0303
F.2.x
Packet Pg. 2769 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 2 of 3 [Revision 4] (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jeff Sims
To: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk; Manuel A. Mancha
Subject: MVTC
Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:58:42 PM
Attachments: 11 30 22 (MVTC Letter).pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hi,
I respectfully ask this letter and attachments be included with the agenda packet for the upcoming MVTC appeal anticipated for the December 6, 2022 Council Meeting.

Thanks,
Jeff Sims
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2770 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F
Packet Pg
F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; Dr. Yxstian A. Gutierrez; David Marquez; Ulises Cabrera; Sean P.

Kelleher
Subject: Polluted Air Impacts on Young Kids - PEN19-0191 & PEN21-0079 Date: Thursday, December 1, 2022 7:54:36 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Council Members,
Tuesday evening, December 6th, you will be considering two warehouse projects that are being proposed in poor locations because of their proximity to homes and the residents in them. The youngest of these residents can be irreputable harmed by the air pollution generated by diesel truck exhaust. The article below, from the Washing Post titled Young kids who breathe polluted air can fall behind in school, discusses the correlation between air pollution and reduced learning and the disproportionate impact on those in poor areas. There have been so many studies documenting the health impacts form the proximity of warehouse activities next to people (sensitive receptors) one would expect elected officials and planning staff would insist on avoiding the potential for this impact.

Both the Moreno Valley Trade Center and the Moreno Valley Business Center are abutting residential neighborhood. The Moreno Valley Business Center is especially close, being directly connected to the backyards of an existing Edgemont neighborhood - one of the poorest in the city. As elected officials it is your responsibility to do all that can be done to protect the residents (your constituents) from all development impacts that could burden their lives. The land where these projects are proposed could be used for less harmful development and denying these projects is the right thing to do so this can occur. It is the right thing to do and it will gain you greater community respect.

Thanks for the consideration,
Tom Thornsley
PS: Links provided below to the story and study:

Young kids who breathe polluted air can fall behind in school, study finds (msn.com) Young kids who breathe polluted air in high-poverty areas can fall behind in school, study finds - The Washington Post
Concentrated poverty, ambient air pollution, and child cognitive development | Science Advances
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2808 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) The Washington Post
Young kids who breathe polluted air can
fall behind in school, study finds
Story by Amudalat Ajasa • Nov 30, 2022 11:00 AM
Young children living in neighborhoods with high rates of poverty are more likely to be exposed to many different air pollutants, and that can harm their development during early childhood, according to a study published Wednesday. The children’s increased exposure to air toxins during infancy can reduce reading and math abilities and cause them to fall behind — for some, the effect is equivalent to losing an entire month of elementary school.

While there are other issues that can affect school preparedness for early-age children, the study found that exposure to air pollutants, when isolated, accounted for a third of the impact when compared with other concerns.

It has long been known that poorer communities are disproportionately exposed to air pollution than more-affluent communities, but the study, published in Science Advances, dives deeper into some impacts, exploring the intersections of neighborhoods’ socioeconomic status and the effects on early-childhood cognitive development, while looking at disparities in air quality.

In the study, researchers show the ways cognitive gaps are formed as early as 6 months and are entrenched by age 2, before children even start school, said lead researcher Geoffrey Wodtke, associate director of the University of Chicago’s Stone Center for Research on Wealth Inequality and Mobility.
“The study is showing that children born into high-poverty neighborhoods are more likely to be exposed to many neurotoxic air pollutants, and that those differences in turn are linked with inequalities in early-childhood development, specifically reading and math abilities measured around the time of school entry,” Wodtke told The Washington Post.

Researchers used data from the U.S. Department of Education’s early-childhood longitudinal study birth cohorts, which assessed 10,000 children born in or around 2001, tracking them through the time they entered kindergarten. The children were from across the United States.

Researchers analyzed the socioeconomic status and air pollution concentrations of the children’s neighborhoods. Scientists then followed the children until they were about 4 years old, when they were assessed for early reading and math skills.
“What’s important is we provide some initial and relatively strong evidence that being born into a poor neighborhood harms early cognitive development, and this is at least partly due to exposure to neurotoxic air pollution,” Wodtke said in a statement.

Some pediatric environmental health scientists were not surprised by these findings, pointing to F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2809 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) previous literature and research on early exposure to air pollutants and the relationship with lower cognitive test scores. But the study provides a steppingstone to understanding how air pollution affects other factors that may influence children’s healthy neurodevelopment, said one pediatrician and professor who has studied intersections.
“This is really important because we have significant health inequities of all kinds for children in the U.S. that tracks with poverty,” said Catherine Karr, an environmental epidemiologist and pediatric environmental medicine specialist at the University of Washington. “Clean air is part of the prescription for every child to meet their full health potential, including cognitive health,” added Karr, who was not involved in the study.

In the study, scientists differentiate between the types of exposures. Poorer communities were more exposed to particulate matter and traffic-related pollution like nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide — exposures that appeared to have more of an impact on reading and math abilities during early-childhood development. But more-affluent communities were more likely to be exposed to ozone air pollutants.

Wodtke said the study does not pinpoint any leading air pollutants that are associated with highpoverty neighborhoods and lower test scores. Instead, it finds many air toxins have a weak association with both.

Experts pointed to mounting evidence that indicates that postnatal exposure to air pollution is associated with deficiencies in cognitive test scores. It has also been linked to attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and externalizing behavior problems in pediatric populations.

Emerging evidence also finds that exposure to fine particulate matter is correlated with reduced cortical thickness and thinner gray matter in the brain, which may influence information processing, learning and memory. Previous research has found that exposure to higher concentrations of smallparticle air pollution is associated with poorer child behavioral functioning and cognitive performance.

Anjum Hajat, an associate professor in the department of epidemiology at the University of Washington, said the study “provides further evidence of the links between poverty, air pollution and health.”
“We have known for some time that living in high-poverty neighborhoods can be bad for your health, so being able to understand why that is allows us to better consider ways to intervene,” said Hajat, who was not part of the study.

Recent research has continued to show that children exposed to elevated levels of air pollution may be more likely to have poor academic skills in early adolescence, including in spelling, reading comprehension and math, according to studies conducted by Columbia University.

Hajat said while the link between air pollution and poverty is “pretty well established,” as are links between neighborhood poverty and other health effects, “this study links these different strands of research to give us one possible solution to improving child development.” F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2810 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2811 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Dio Perez
To: Gabriel Diaz
Subject: Fw:

Date: Thursday, December 1, 2022 8:14:01 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please vote No on the Sport Park that is proposed on Ironwood/Redland Blv That park will light up our rural are and bring crime to our quiet low crime area.

Please VOTE No. Also Vote NO on the Truck Stop in Redland Blv.

Thank You
Dio Perez
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2812 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Dio Perez
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Fw:

Date: Thursday, December 1, 2022 8:23:37 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please vote No on the Sport Park and the Truck Stop that is proposed on Redland Blv That Park and Truck Stop will light up our rural are and bring crime , prostitution to our quiet low crime area.

Thank You
Dio Perez
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2813 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Gabriel Diaz
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Julia Descoteaux
Subject: FW: No more Whs
Date: Monday, December 5, 2022 3:41:00 PM
Hello Sean and Julia,
I received this email below.

Thank you,
Gabriel
Gabriel Diaz
Associate Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3226 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org 14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
NOTICE
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED.

THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL, AND MAY BE EXEMPT OR PROHIBITED FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

IF YOU RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, DO NOT FORWARD OR OTHERWISE SHARE THIS MESSAGE.

INSTEAD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE SENDER AND OUR OFFICE OF THE ERROR. -----Original Message-----
From: Dio Perez <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2022 7:08 AM
To: Gabriel Diaz <[email protected]>
Subject: No more Whs
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Gabriel
Please no more warehouse in the Alessander and Day st.

This big Bldg are ugly to the city and is only going to bring more graffiti for the citizens to look at or big concrete view instead of Mnt view. This big warehouse are ruining the view that once we had especially as we drive thru the 60Fwy.

One more thing NO on the Truck Stop and Sport Field Park on Redland Blv.

Thank you so much.

Dio Perez
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2814 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Manuel A. Mancha
Subject: Fwd: Warehouse projects
Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 9:56:08 AM
Get Outlook for iOS
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 11:43:40 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Edward A. Delgado <[email protected]>; David Marquez <[email protected]>
Subject: Warehouse projects
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello,
My family and myself are concerned citizens of Moreno Valley, As long time residences, since 1999, we are very worried about the proposed warehouse projects for the East end of our city. We moved here from Riverside to get away from all the traffic and congestion and to enjoy the living in a rural area with houses and animals. The proposed project off of Redlands and Eucalyptus will destroy our way of life and make everyday chores difficult, not to mention the side affects of all the 18 wheelers in the area. I realize that most if not all of the people associated with this proposal do not live anywhere near the area and are only looking at "revenue" for the City. This is no reason to change the landscape of our Eastern portion of this city.

Moreno Valley doesn’t need anymore warehouses near family homes. What we do need are more large parcel homes to attract good solid residences that actually care for our community. There are much better locations that already have the infrastructure to handle the massive amounts of trucks.

Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd Allen Young
11051 Quincy St.

Rancho Belago, CA 92555
951-314-8145
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2815 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Manuel A. Mancha
Subject: Fwd: Stop warehousing near homes
Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 9:56:40 AM
Get Outlook for iOS
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Stefanie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 2:14:38 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Stop warehousing near homes
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello,
I’m writing to request and plead for no more warehouses to be built on Redlands Blvd in Moreno Valley 92555 zip code. I’ve lived in this zip code since 1989 when this area was beautiful, filled with wildlife and much better air quality. I purchased my current home in 2013 which is right next to Adam Halls Nursery on a half acre lot. I have children who I worry about growing up in this area now because of how much growth and pollution there has been. We enjoy going on walks in nearby fields and appreciating what little space is left that hasn’t been developed.

Please move these projects to places where families and homes do not exist. Enough is enough Thank you for your time in reading this and I hope it makes some kind of difference.

Stefanie Stokes
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2816 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: [email protected]
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Friday, March 3, 2023 9:24:54 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Mr. Kelleher,
I am forwarding a copy of my letter to the Mayor, below. I feel you would benefit from reading it as well as the people I originally sent it to.

John Blackburn
14285 Begonia Lane
Moreno Valley, CA. 92555
[email protected]
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 9:20 AM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Cc: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
The Honorable Ulises Cabrera
Mayor, City of Moreno Valley, CA.
03 March 2023
Dear Mayor Cabrera,
I am writing regarding the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center. I live in the relatively new housing tract at the corner of Cactus Ave. and Redlands Blvd. I am aware of the Moreno Valley’s ambitions to become a logistics center for the Inland Empire, similar to what the city of Perris is trying to do.

In the case of Perris, I see a complete failure. Perris has become a nightmare of trucks, warehouses, and random new neighborhoods. The roads are being destroyed by the weight and number of vehicles using them. Traffic is horrible as a result of these monsters. These trucks are being driven through housing as if they were the family Camry. I lived in Perris, and now I avoid it at all costs.

In Moreno Valley I see a similar situation arising. A mishmash of new housing construction with no apparent coordination or oversight as far as design language or master planning. There are three now housing sites within one mile of my neighborhood alone. All from different builders and none have anything in common with each other. I also see a monster logistics center arising the opposite direction around the Sketchers warehouse. There is no way I want hundreds or trucks spewing diesel exhaust and breaking down the surrounding roads. The 60 freeway is already massively overloaded, F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2817 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) and the 60-215 interchange is now in a 24 hour a day rush hour. What will happen when you add more trucks?
More warehouses are not panacea for creating jobs. I would stipulate that by creating hundreds of minimum wage warehouse jobs you are actually doing the city a disservice by removing the incentive for higher-paying jobs to come to Moreno Valley. Karma/B-ON is a good start, but that is the tip of the iceberg. You need medical device manufacturers (Johnson & Johnson is in Irvine, Abbott is in Temecula, Cardinal Health is in San Diego), software companies (Google, Apple).

Incentivize start-ups to make MoVal their homes. Think outside the box. A warehouse wasteland lacking qualified employees will not accomplish this.

I urge you, and all Council Members and Planners, to rethink this strategy and change direction. All cities must evolve, but don’t become a dinosaur.

Sincerely,
John Blackburn
14285 Begonia Lane
Moreno Valley, CA. 92555
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2818 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Manuel A. Mancha
Cc: Catherine Lin
Subject: FW: Warehouse
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 2:22:57 PM
Sean and Manny,
Please see below.

Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: C Tom <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2023 7:56 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Subject: Warehouse
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good Morning Ms. Descoteaux,
I have been a resident of Moreno Valley in the 92555 and 92553 area for over 20 years now. We have seen a myriad of changes, most for the better.

It is too much to ask of us to live next door to a giant warehouse. We have children and we just want to feel safe in our homes. Living directly adjacent to a warehouse, be it the Moreno Trade Center or a Pilot truck stop or some other warehouse, does not induce a feeling of safety. Each of us just wants to feel safe and secure in our homes.

I had planned to live out the rest of my life in my lovely home and now I'm not so sure I want to now.

There was a reason why the city planners had originally designated areas as residential. To change them to commercial to accommodate warehouses is egregious.

A park as a proposed trade-off is not really a trade-off considering that it will require tax payers to maintain it. So the warehouse builds us a park so we can pay taxes on it for the rest of our lives.

I wonder how many people would buy a home in Moreno Valley if the city put that in their welcome to Moreno Valley video. "Buy a $500,000 home and pay $11,000 every year in property tax and you too could live across the street from a mega warehouse!" Not my vision of a beautiful, well-planned out city, but I'm left to assume it's yours and my only recourse is to move.

Always hopeful,
Cryscynthia Tom
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2819 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Manuel A. Mancha; Catherine Lin
Subject: FW: Warehouse Impacts
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 7:07:21 PM
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Ron Alguire <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2023 4:00 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; Edward A. Delgado <[email protected]> Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Warehouse Impacts
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Team
The proliferation of warehouses in Moreno Valley has reached the tipping point where the health and quality of life of your constituents are being negatively impacted. Multiple Southern California cities are placing moratoriums on warehouse activity and we should be doing the same. I took this picture from my car at 11:30 am on the eastbound 60 coming into Moreno Valley on a Wednesday. Mr. Delgado, I personally spoke to you during your campaign and you stated you didn’t take a penny from Iddo Benzeevi and you would not let the Northeast side lose its rural density or become another Ontario or Fontana.

I have concerns for my children and grandchildren and all families in this area the will take the brunt of this irresponsible management of our city who seems to continually ignore the planning commission and resident concerns. I don’t want a “tradeoff” sports park built where families will not be able to breath to enjoy it with major warehouses and full truck stops being built just feet away from residential homes.

I fervently oppose industrial zoning and warehouses next to residential communities and in general the oversaturation of warehouses in our East end of the city and hope you would support and defend the people you represent.

Thanks for your attention to this matter
Respectfully
Ron Alguire
11353 Ladd Ave
Moreno Valley, CA
951 242-8310
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2820 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2821 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: FW: Warehouse projects
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 8:09:39 AM
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 11:44 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Edward A. Delgado <[email protected]>; David Marquez <[email protected]>
Subject: Warehouse projects
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello,
My family and myself are concerned citizens of Moreno Valley, As long time residences, since 1999, we are very worried about the proposed warehouse projects for the East end of our city. We moved here from Riverside to get away from all the traffic and congestion and to enjoy the living in a rural area with houses and animals. The proposed project off of Redlands and Eucalyptus will destroy our way of life and make everyday chores difficult, not to mention the side affects of all the 18 wheelers in the area. I realize that most if not all of the people associated with this proposal do not live anywhere near the area and are only looking at "revenue" for the City. This is no reason to change the landscape of our Eastern portion of this city.

Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd Allen Young
11051 Quincy St.

Rancho Belago, CA 92555
951-314-8145
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2822 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: FW: Stop warehousing near homes
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 8:10:00 AM
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefanie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 2:15 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Stop warehousing near homes
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello,
I’m writing to request and plead for no more warehouses to be built on Redlands Blvd in Moreno Valley 92555 zip code. I’ve lived in this zip code since 1989 when this area was beautiful, filled with wildlife and much better air quality. I purchased my current home in 2013 which is right next to Adam Halls Nursery on a half acre lot. I have children who I worry about growing up in this area now because of how much growth and pollution there has been.

We enjoy going on walks in nearby fields and appreciating what little space is left that hasn’t been developed.

Please move these projects to places where families and homes do not exist. Enough is enough Thank you for your time in reading this and I hope it makes some kind of difference.

Stefanie Stokes
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2823 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jane Halstead
To: Sean P. Kelleher
Cc: Julia Descoteaux
Subject: FW: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 10:44:08 AM
For the public record. Thank you,
Jane Halstead
Manager of the Office of Mayor and City Council/City Clerk City Clerk's Office
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3010 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Jane Halstead
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 9:56 AM
Cc: Mike Lee <[email protected]>; Brian Mohan <[email protected]>; Michael Lloyd, P.E. <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Moreno Valley Trade Center
For your information.

From: C Tom <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 8:50 AM
To: City Clerk's Dept_DG <[email protected]>
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning,
My heartfelt thank you for your service to our city.

However I have to say, I am not thrilled with the council's decision to put a distribution center so close to my house in my nice quiet neighborhood.

Zone 92555 is your highest income bracket with big beautiful homes on large lots. I love my house. I can't imagine someone paying $700,000 for my house and $9000 in property tax to live next door to a warehouse. I know I wouldn't.

Crys Tom,
resident 92555, Valley Springs Homes
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2824 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: William Landa
To: Moreno Valley Mayor
Cc: Gabriel Diaz; Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 5:17:50 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Mayor Ulises Cabrera,
I am a resident and employee of Riverside County; I live on the March JPA and I work as an ICU nurse at Riverside University Health System. My wife and I are raising three young children aged 4, 2, and 1 years old here in Moreno Valley. As a father and a healthcare professional, I am concerned about the impact of the rapid expansion of logistics centers in the area. I am writing to you specifically about the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center between Quincy St. and Redlands boulevard.

The Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) is just another development in the unending destruction to the people, land, and air of this area. The MVTC project will cause more pollution and decrease air quality. The environmental plan itself says that long term decrease in air quality from NOx and greenhouse gas emission cannot be fully mitigated. These emissions are linked to pulmonary, cardiovascular, and oncological disorders. As an ICU nurse I have seen first hand the devastation that pulmonary diseases such as asthma, lung cancer, and COPD can cause. I have been witness to the aftermath of young people who suffer anoxic brain injuries from these conditions. As a father of young children I have fear and anxiety of the health effects caused by air pollution and traffic caused by these logistics centers. I must weigh staying in the community and raising my children here or leaving for areas with cleaner air and water.

Choosing to allow projects like this to move forward may create new short term jobs and economic growth. However, these jobs are often low paying and subject to replacement through automation. The economic growth is limited by physical warehouse space. The detriment to the communities' health is not limited, and will affect generations of residents.

Please consider alternatives to these warehouses. As elected officials, please serve and protect the health of the community.

Regards,
William Landa
(661) 202-0831
[email protected]
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2825 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: George Hague
To: Gabriel Diaz
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center comments
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 5:34:48 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good afternoon City Council members, April 10, 2023
The 1,26 million sq ft Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level below thresholds of significance consist of the following:
o Aesthetics: Implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block views of Reche Canyon and the Badlands (and the San Bernardino Mountains beyond) from the segment of Encelia Avenue that abuts the Project site on the south (west of Shubert Street). Also, implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block scenic views of Mount Russell and its foothills from the segment of Eucalyptus Avenue that abuts the Project site. This would be a significant and unavoidable direct impact.
o Air Quality (Air Quality Management Plan Conflict): The Project would emit air pollutants (NOX) that would contribute to a delay in the attainment of federal and State ozone standards in the SCAB. Because the Project requires a General Plan Amendment, it also would exceed the growth projections contained in SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. As such, the Project would conflict with and could obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Project impacts due to a conflict with the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP would be significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis.
o Air Quality (Criteria Pollutant Emissions): After the application of Project design features, mandatory regulatory requirements, and feasible mitigation measures, Project-related NOX emissions during long-term operation of the Project would remain above the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds.

Accordingly, Project-related emissions would not meet SCAQMD air quality standards and contribute to the non-attainment of ozone standards in the SCAB.

Therefore, Project operational-related impacts due to NOX emissions would be significant and unavoidable on a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis. o Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG Emissions Generation): Projectrelated GHG emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold for GHG emissions and would result in a cumulatively-considerable impact to the environment." (page 5-1 in MVTC Final EIR) The above awful health impacting pollution near family homes could not be eliminated by the MVTC and so they are telling you to hold your nose and accept a sports park that is next to Redlands Blvd north of SR-60 which is a F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2826 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) diesel truck route — again impacting the health of children breathing in diesel pollution deeply during the playing of sports.

Sincerey,
George Hague
P.S. The 40 million sq ft World Logistic Center warehouse project with its 13,000 daily diesel truck trips is beginning its grading later this year. We do not need more warehouses and the unions will have plenty of work for years to come.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2827 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: PAUL BOLASKY
To: Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Martinez; Cheylynda Barnard; City Manager"s Office_DG; City Clerk"s Dept_DG
Subject: I DO NOT!!!!Support Moreno Valley Trade Center Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 5:41:02 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
I am writing as I am NOT in support of the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

This project will bring the residents of Moreno Valley more smog from trucks/cars and make the roads worse and freeways horrible. It already takes way to long to use the freeways going though Moreno Valley.

Please Join me in NOT continuing support for the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Thank you
Sent from my iPhone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2828 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Debbie Walsh
To: Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Cheylynda Barnard; Gabriel Diaz; David Martinez; Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk"s Dept_DG Subject: MV Warehouse Project, GPA PEN19-0191, Change of Zone PEN19-0192, Plot Plan PEN19-0193 Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 8:55:53 PM
Attachments: MVtradeCenterletterApril11.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hi Everyone,
Please find the attached letter regarding the Moreno Valley Warehouse Project.

RAMV is in opposition to this massive warehouse directly next to homes. Not only is this a health hazard to the community, it is a safety risk to the entire neighborhood.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2829 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) April 11, 2023
Rural Association of Mead Valley (RAMV)
PO Box 2244
Perris, CA 92572
Moreno Valley City Council
Attn: Gabriel Diaz, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
RE: Moreno Valley Trade Center Project including Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No 20210039038), GPA PEN19-0191, Change of Zone PEN19-0192, Plot Plan PEN19-0193, and Tentative parcel Map 37836.

Honorable Council Members:

The General Mills Warehouse in Perris had a very large explosion on July 6, 2021 from their commercial sized propane tanks. A recently built warehouse and yet serious safety violations occurred. If this explosion took place inside the building there would have been serious consequences. The explosion could be felt and heard for over 5 miles away waking up residents past Nuevo Ave. Three large propane tanks exploded and caught fire.

PERRIS (LLN) - On Tuesday night, July 06, 2021, Cal Fire / Riverside County Fire along with AMR and the Riverside County Sheriff's Department responded to reports of an explosion at a large warehouse. The explosion was reported around 10:00pm in the 4100 block of Indian F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2830 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Avenue at the General Mills warehouse. According to Cal Fire / Riverside County Fire, firefighters responded to numerous reports of an explosion at a distribution center. Upon arrival, three propane tanks were off gassing and involved with fire. One person suffered moderate burn injuries and was transported by ground to a local hospital.

This massive warehouse over 1.5 million sq. ft. is directly next to homes and is an example of why warehouses “must” have a 1000 foot buffer between homes and warehouses. A buffer “must” be provided between property lines of the home and warehouse not measured from dock doors to residential structures.

New warehouses are not as safe as most people think and when they catch fire it is very difficult to put them out. Equipment from a number of agencies need to be brought in. How many ladder trucks does the City of Moreno Valley have to put out a massive warehouse fire? How long will it take to acquire additional ladder trucks? Another example is the Redlands Amazon Warehouse along the I-215 Freeway is a Prime example of why this warehouse SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2831 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) This recently built state of the art Redlands warehouse burned to the ground just two years ago. It was 600,000 square feet along the I-10 freeway. Operated by Amazon, this recently built warehouse caught on fire and burned to the ground quickly. Those driving along the freeway could feel the heat from the fire.

The Redlands warehouse was 600,000 sq. ft. and 45 feet in height. The Proposed warehouse is 1,328,853 sq. ft. in size and at least 100 feet in height.

Even though this recently constructed warehouse had the state of the art sprinkler system, it went up in flames quickly and was completely destroyed according to the Redlands Daily news.

There were about 100 people working inside when the fire was reported about 5:30 a.m., and they all got out safely, city spokesman Carl Baker said. “It went up really fast, and the whole building was involved,” Baker said. He described the damage as a total loss. The damage was estimated at “hundreds of millions of dollars,” Baker said.

One focus of the investigation will be why what Baker called “a state-of-the-art” sprinkler system failed to limit the fire’s spread. “Obviously, the suppression system didn’t work as intended,” he said.

Redlands Daily News Article
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2832 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Redlands City does not have the equipment necessary to fight this type of warehouse. A large number of agencies from other cities and counties were brought in with ladder trucks to fight this Redlands City fire.

Will the fire trucks be tall enough to put water on top of a building 100 feet or more? That is much taller than the 45-foot warehouse that burned down in Redlands. Will there be enough ladder trucks to fight this type of fire with a building 100 feet tall or more? Will there be enough of a setback from the residential neighborhoods if the walls over 100 feet tall collapse during a fire?
How does the City of Moreno Valley plan to fight a fire if one were to break out if this massive warehouse were to be built? The project is located just 118 feet away the nearest family homes.

The Rural Association of Mead Valley is opposed to the Moreno Valley Trade Center Project for this and the following reasons. This Project is for a proposed 1,328,853 square foot Industrial warehouse building up to 100 feet in height on a 72.5-acre site and adjacent to existing singlefamily homes within a rural animal keeping overlay. The change in the Project Site’s Land Use Designation would result in a total increase of approximately 80.04-acres of the Business Park (BP) General Plan Land Use Designation and a corresponding reduction of approximately 80.04- acres of the Residential 2 (R2) General Plan Land Use Designation. 1) a General Plan Amendment (PEN19-0191) to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project Site from Residential 2 (R2) to Business Park (BP); 2) a Change of Zone (PEN19-0192) to amend the City’s Zoning Atlas to rezone the Project Site from Residential Agriculture 2 (RA2) to Light Industrial (LI) and remove the Primary Animal Keeping Overlay (PAKO) district; 3) Tentative Parcel Map F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2833 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) (PEN19-0234) to merge 11 parcels into 1 parcel; and 4) a Plot Plan (PEN19-0193) for an approximately 1,328,853 square foot Warehouse/Distribution Building. The Project Site is located south of Eucalyptus Avenue, north of Encelia Avenue, west of Quincy Street and west or Redlands Boulevard comprising Assessor Parcel Nos. 488- 340-002 through 012.

The Project requires a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone from Single Family Residential land with animal keeping, a rural land use, to Industrial Zoning. This massive Industrial Project is not compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The General Plan that was just updated includes the Project site as Residential housing. No indications were made during the General Plan update that this area would be changed in the near future from residential to industrial land uses. The MVTC is inconsistent with the recently approved 2040 General Plan which points out that industrial is incompatible with residential zoned areas. Policy LCC.3-2 directs the City to use "development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another”. The 2040 General Plan approved in June also requires the city to screen and buffer nonresidential projects to protect adjacent residential property when necessary to mitigate noise, glare and other adverse effects on adjacent lands.

The World Logistics Center and numerous other massive logistics warehouses are set to open nearby this Project location. This Project will add to the tens of thousands of additional truck trips approved on the already gridlocked I-60 Freeway. The unrealistic analysis of job creation assumes that there is a need for additional warehouse workers. The facts are that the current logistics and e-commerce warehouses cannot fill their positions.

Where will these tens of thousands of additional workers come from? The best use of this land will be for single-family homes.

If the Project is constructed and used as an e-commerce fulfillment center the amount of vehicle trips is projected to be more than 5,000 vehicles per day. The MVTC’s plan as a warehouse is to allow the southern entrance of the project to allow 1,000’s of vehicles to access Encelia Street.

The project is located 118 feet away the nearest family homes. Building height 100 feet or more. It is very difficult to put out a fire for warehouses 44’ tall. What equipment is available to put out a fire for a 100’ warehouse structure? This Project is for a proposed 1,328,853 square foot Industrial warehouse building up to 100 feet in height on a 72.5-acre site and adjacent to existing single-family homes within a rural animal keeping overlay.

Moreno Valley Municipal Code

9.05.040 Industrial site development standards.

A. General Requirements.

B. Special Site Development Standards.

1. When any industrial district abuts a property in any residential district, a F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2834 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) minimum building setback equal to the building height, but not less than twenty (20) feet shall be required from such residential district. Further, the then (10) feet of such setback nearest the district boundary line shall be landscaped.

9. In the LI district, industrial and warehouse, structures greater than fifty thousand (50,000) square feet in building area shall be separated from any residential district as determined by an air quality and noise impact analysis. The minimum separation distance for such uses shall be two hundred fifty (250) feet between the residential district and the truck court or loading area.

The developer does not have a tenant for the building.

The Project is proposed to be built under speculation.

The developer has the option of developing this Project as a fulfillment/e-commerce center or logistics warehouse.

The following significant and unavoidable environmental impacts have been identified in the Final EIR and will require mitigation but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance:
1) Aesthetics: Substantial Adverse Effect on a Scenic Vista; 2) Air 2 Quality: Air Quality Management Plan Conflict; 3) Air Quality: Criteria Pollutant Emissions; and 4) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: GHG Emissions Generation. Details of these significant unavoidable adverse impacts are discussed in the Final EIR and are summarized, or were otherwise provided in Section 5.3, Environmental Effects Which Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation and Findings, in the Statement of Facts and Findings. (Page 11).

Moreno Valley is one of the areas designates as a Disadvantage Community under SB 535.

Adding thousands of additional logistics trucks to this community will greatly impact the health of over 200,000 residents living in your community.

The Environmental Justice Element is now required by the State to be a part of all General Plans. The City must “minimize any potential health risks” of new development on adjacent sensitive receptors and “designated truck routes that avoid sensitive land uses” (Policies EJ.1-3 and EJ. 1-9). The City must create a substantial buffer between homes and the warehouse. Screening must be installed along the southern and western boundaries of the Project. All truck parking and docks must be located on the north side and east side of the Project away from residential neighborhoods.

Although the Project has a number of entrances most warehouses use just one driveway for trucks to enter and exit, thereby reducing staffing to one gate. The Project does not have sufficient room at any of the entrances to prevent trucks from backing up onto Eucalyptus Ave.

The Project must include a substantial amount of solar power, especially if used as an ecommerce business. The current power grid is not sufficient to produce enough electricity for the current customers. The drain on the power grid during summer months produces frequent brown outs throughout Southern California.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2835 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) A large warehouse in the City of Perris recently had a large explosion from a large propane tank.

This warehouse is next to residential homes. The blast from the explosion could be seen and heard from miles away. No propane tanks should be installed and used on warehouse sites. All forklifts, Goats, and equipment should be electric powered.

The Project is located in an area with the worst smog in the nation.

This Project will increase greenhouse gas levels that are already impacting Communities in Western Riverside County. Mead Valley is also a disadvantaged community. The impacts warehouses in Moreno Valley and Perris are having negatively impacts to the entire region. The I-215 Freeway is congested for most of the day. The I-60 Freeway is congested with thousands of trucks. This backs up traffic throughout the region. Trucks are now using residential streets to avoid the congested freeways. Cajalco Road is backed up bumper to bumper during the day.

Trucks are using Van Buren, Alessandro and Cajalco to get to the I-91 to get to the Ports. Our freeways cannot add tens of thousands of additional trucks and cars from any new warehouses without severe gridlock to our freeways.

5.1 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS

IMPLEMENTED
The CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR disclose the significant environmental effects of a project which cannot be avoided if the proposed project is implemented (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(b)). As described in detail in Section 4.0, Environmental Analysis, of this EIR, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in impacts to the environment that cannot be reduced to below a level of significance after the consideration of Project design features, compliance with applicable federal, State and local regulations, and the application of the feasible mitigation measures identified in this EIR. The significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level below thresholds of significance consist of the following:
• Aesthetics: Implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block views of Reche Canyon and the Badlands (and the San Bernardino Mountains beyond) from the segment of Encelia Avenue that abuts the Project site on the south (west of Shubert Street). Also, implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block scenic views of Mount Russell and its foothills from the segment of Eucalyptus Avenue that abuts the Project site. This would be a significant and unavoidable direct impact.
• Air Quality (Air Quality Management Plan Conflict): The Project would emit air pollutants (NOX) that would contribute to a delay in the attainment of federal and State ozone standards in the SCAB. Because the Project requires a General Plan Amendment, it also would exceed the growth projections contained in SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. As such, the Project would conflict with and could obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Project impacts due to a conflict with the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP would be significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis.
•Air Quality (Criteria Pollutant Emissions): After the application of Project design features, mandatory regulatory requirements, and feasible mitigation measures, Project-related NOX emissions during long-term operation of the Project would remain above the applicable F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2836 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) SCAQMD regional thresholds. Accordingly, Project-related emissions would not meet SCAQMD air quality standards and contribute to the non-attainment of ozone standards in the SCAB.

Therefore, Project operational-related impacts due to NOX emissions would be significant and unavoidable on a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis. • Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG Emissions Generation): Project-related GHG emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold for GHG emissions and would result in a cumulatively-considerable impact to the environment." (page 5-1 in MVTC Final EIR) RAMV is opposed to the Moreno Valley Trade Center Project that will impact the entire region.

We cannot afford to turn anymore of our residential zoned areas into Industrial zoned areas.

Our freeways are already at capacity, our air quality is already the worse in the nation, and our local roads are already being destroyed by truck traffic. Please consider all of the impacts that this Project will bring to not only Moreno Valley, but the entire region.

I urge the City Council to follow the Planning Commission’s recommendation and deny this Project.

Sincerely,
Debbie Walsh
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2837 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: William Landa
To: Edward A. Delgado
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:10:44 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Edward A. Delgado,
I am a resident and employee of Riverside County; I live on the March JPA and I work as an ICU nurse at Riverside University Health System. My wife and I are raising three young children aged 4, 2, and 1 years old here in Moreno Valley. As a father and a healthcare professional, I am concerned about the impact of the rapid expansion of logistics centers in the area. I am writing to you specifically about the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center between Quincy St. and Redlands boulevard.

Please consider alternatives to these warehouses. As an elected official, please serve and protect the health of the community.

Regards,
William Landa
(661) 202-0831
[email protected]
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2838 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: William Landa
To: David Marquez
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trace Center
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:12:20 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear David Marquez,
I am a resident and employee of Riverside County; I live on the March JPA and I work as an ICU nurse at Riverside University Health System. My wife and I are raising three young children aged 4, 2, and 1 years old here in Moreno Valley. As a father and a healthcare professional, I am concerned about the impact of the rapid expansion of logistics centers in the area. I am writing to you specifically about the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center between Quincy St. and Redlands boulevard.

Please consider alternatives to these warehouses. As elected officials, please serve and protect the health of the community.

Regards,
William Landa
(661) 202-0831
[email protected]
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2839 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: William Landa
To: Cheylynda Barnard
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 8:15:28 AM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Dear Cheylynda Barnard,
I am a resident and employee of Riverside County; I live on the March JPA and I work as an ICU nurse at Riverside University Health System. My wife and I are raising three young children aged 4, 2, and 1 years old here in Moreno Valley. As a father and a healthcare professional, I am concerned about the impact of the rapid expansion of logistics centers in the area. I am writing to you specifically about the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center between Quincy St. and Redlands boulevard.

Please consider alternatives to these warehouses. As elected officials, please serve and protect the health of the community.

Regards,
William Landa
(661) 202-0831
[email protected]
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2840 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Tom Thornsley
To: City Clerk; Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Comment Letter for Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 10:20:09 AM
Attachments: Council Members Letters.docx
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good Morning,
Attached is my comment letter for the upcoming public hearing on the Moreno Valley Trade Center. Please make sure is gets to the Council Members and is part of the public record provided in the Staff Report for the hearing.

Sincerely,
Tom Thornsley
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2841 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Tom Thornsley
[email protected]
April 11, 2023
To: Moreno Valley City Council (via email: [email protected]) Subject: Reject Moreno Valley Trade Center Appeal
Dear Moreno Valley Councilmembers,
You are once again about to consider the Moreno Valley Trade Center, a project that was denied by the Planning Commission for good cause. Since that denial the developer has done a lot to sway your vote by first offering to improve a section of Alessandro Boulevard that has nothing to do with their project.

Now the developer is offering you the chance to get a Sports Park if you agree to approve their project.

That is a blatant, out in the open, bribe for your vote and not how the voters of this Moreno Valley expect you govern our city. . Think about the precedence this sets for others seeking project approval.

Are City Council Members’ votes for sale?
In the year and a half since this appeal was first continued, just before a vote (likely to deny) would have taken place. Since then there is no doubt the developer and even city staff encourage you to approve this project over the objections of the community. I expect each Council Member to disclose all their conversation regarding this development prior to the start of the public hearing for this project.

This project site is intended for homes which are necessary for the city to stay on track with offering a diversity of housing types and to meet their State housing requirements. If you know the Municipal Code at all, you would know that Light Industrial Districts (for warehouse develop) must be buffered from Residential Districts by other uses such a Business Park. Here is what the Municipal Code say:

9.05.010 Purpose and intent.

2. To protect residential, commercial and nuisance-free nonhazardous industrial uses from noise, odor, dust, smoke, truck traffic and other objectionable influences and from fire, explosion, radiation and other hazards potentially related to certain industrial uses;

9.05.020 Industrial districts.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2842 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Is it appropriate to only provide one narrow range of employment opportunities over an entire city? In the past decade, the city has processed land use changes to permit in excess of 53,000,000 square feet of large warehousing opportunities with 40,000,000 more on the cusp of development. During this time the city has done away with available land for housing, commercial, and business park opportunities, all in conflict with the intents of the old and new General Plans intent. Now it seems little value is being placed on the city’s newly adopted general plan which intended to establish a stable, balance of growth for the foreseeable future.

Good planning policy has always advocated keeping industrial uses away from residential. However, past and present city leaders and planning staff have failed to maintain this policy for the protection of the existing and potential residential areas. Nor have they embraced their General Plan’s objectives.

Environment impacts from industrial uses such as warehousing impose significant harm to residential areas. In many instances you will be lead to believe that air, noise, traffic, and lighting impacts are minimal. Playing up impacts as minimal detracts from the ultimate reality of putting a warehouse adjacent to existing homes. The complexities of these impacts will way heavy on adjacent residents and degrade their standard of living. This also devalues their homes and will hinder development of adjacent and nearby vacant residential land, further limiting the City’s ability to reach its required housing count.

So what should be done? Compliance with the City’s General Plan should be maintained, not only here but throughout the Moreno Valley. At this time the city has reached its saturation point for megawarehouses and should be looking to establish higher goals for employment diversity and opportunities while achieving the needs for residential development. Just east of this project site is an approved specific plan that will develop the equivalent of 40 one-million square foot mega-warehouses. This alone should be enough for us to just say NO to any other mega-warehouses, including NO to the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Sincerely,
Tom Thornsley
Attachment: Moreno Valley Warehouse Approvals 2009-2022 F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2843 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Moreno Valley Warehouse Approvals 2009-2021
Since 2009, Moreno Valley has approved, or is reviewing, at least the following industrial warehouse projects that serve as “distribution” or “logistics” centers for consumer goods, and as such, they are part of the “goods movement” network 53,070,835 square feet:
- March Business Center (2009) – General Plan Amendment to allow 1,484,407 square - feet of industrial warehouse space on 66.9-acres.
- Master Plot Plan PA07-0035 (2010) - 409,598 square foot industrial warehouse - West Ridge Commerce Center (2011) - 937,260 square foot warehouse distribution - building
- VIP Moreno Valley Project (2012) - 1,616,133 square foot warehouse space - First Inland Logistics Center II Project (2013) - 400,130 square feet warehouse space - First Nandina Logistics Center Project (2014) - 1,450,000 square feet warehouse space - Prologis Eucalyptus Industrial Park Project (2015) - 2,244,419 square feet of warehouse uses including a General Plan Amendment from residential to Light Industrial - World Logistics Center (2015) - 40.6 million square feet of warehouse logistics development on 3,918 acres in eastern Moreno Valley
- Indian Street Commerce Center Project (2016) - 446,350 square feet of warehouse space - Moreno Valley Logistics Center (2016) - 1,736,180 total square feet of warehouse space - Brodiaea Commerce Center (2017) - 262,398 square foot warehouse including a rezone from Business Park-Mixed Use to “Light Industrial”
- Moreno Valley Business Park (2021) - 220,390 square feet of warehouse logistics development including a General Plan Amendment to from commercial to light industrial - Heacock Commerce Center (2021) – application for a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone for two high cube industrial buildings totaling 873,967 square feet - Compass Danbe Center Point (2021) – application for a General Plan Amendment to allow for the development of two light industrial buildings of 389,603 square feet F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2844 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 1 Sean P. Kelleher
From: George Hague <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 11:44 AM
To: Gabriel Diaz
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Comments on Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC).... "Moreno Valley warehouse — larger than city’s mall "
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning City Council members, April 11, 2023
The 1.26 million sq ft Moreno Valley Trade Center's (MVTC) has done almost nothing to reduce its significant Diesel pollution impacting the health of nearby residents — especially of children and the elderly.— since the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the project. Even their 18 acre sports park mentioned in the June 2022 article found below is adjacent to Redlands Blvd which north of SR-60 is a city designated diesel truck route for the MVTC and other warehouse projects like the World Logistic Center (WLC) that will again impact the health of children using the park.

BOTH THE MVTC AND SPORTS PARK ARE IN THE WRONG LOCATION BECAUSE OF TOXIC DIESEL POLLUTION AND HOW THEY WILL RESULT IN THE HEALTH IMPACTS TO CHILDREN.

The 40 million sq ft World Logistic Center (WLC) with its 13,000 Daily Diesel Truck Trips impacting SR-60/local roads will begin grading this year and will construct at least 26 warehouses about the size of the MVTC. Moreno Valley doesn’t need to approve any more warehouses and unions will have work for many years to come on the WLC.

Sincerely,
George Hague
Moreno Valley warehouse — larger than city’s
mall — is back for consideration
•
•
•
•
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2845 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 2 Silvia Flores, seen Friday, June 17, 2022, with children, Jillian Flores,13, at right, and Slater Flores, 11, opposes a 1.26- million-square-foot warehouse in her neighborhood. They are standing in the middle of Mozart Way, with Encelia Avenue behind them, where the proposed warehouse could rise. (Photo by Terry Pierson, The Press-Enterprise/SCNG) By DAVID DOWNEY | [email protected] | The Press-Enterprise PUBLISHED: June 19, 2022 at 7:00 a.m. | UPDATED: June 19, 2022 at 7:01 a.m.

A plan to build a warehouse larger than the Moreno Valley Mall across the street from houses on half-acre lots is returning to the Moreno Valley City Council.

The council is set to decide Tuesday, June 21, whether to greenlight a 1.26-million-square-foot logistics project called the Moreno Valley Trade Center, on 80 acres south of the 60 Freeway.

The developer, Dallas-based Hillwood Investment Properties, has said the warehouse would stand 48 feet tall.

The project’s final environmental impact reportstates that the building could reach 100 feet if occupied by a fulfillment center filling the orders of online shoppers.

Previous
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2846 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 3 ••
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2847 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 4 •
•
• Next
1 of 2
A 1.26-million-square-foot warehouse is proposed to be built on this land, seen Friday, June 17, 2022, across the street from Moreno Valley homes. (Photo by Terry Pierson, The Press-Enterprise/SCNG) In advance of Tuesday’s meeting, letters from people on both sides of the issue have poured in to the city.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2848 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 5 Walter Fus, saying he has been a Moreno Valley resident since 1977 and is a retired Air Force pilot, wrote Saturday, June 11, that approving the project “would be the most egregious decision this council could ever make.” Cristina Rivera, in a Wednesday, June 15, email, urged approval in praising an amenity the developer promised, if allowed to build. The project “will bring a new desperately needed sports park to the City of Moreno Valley,” Rivera wrote.

Union carpenters submitted letters of support, saying the project would create construction jobs.

A decision was postponed
In October, the Moreno Valley Planning Commission rejected the project on a 4-0 vote, with one commissioner not participating due to a potential conflict of interest, concluding the center was incompatible with a neighborhood to the south. Hillwood Investment Properties appealed the decision to the council, which discussed the project in December but postponed a decision.

Now the project is back.

City planners are recommending the council approve it, by certifying the environmental impact report, approving a general plan amendment, changing the zone and making a determination that the project won’t “result in a net loss in residential capacity.”
In changing the property designation, the city would eliminate the potential for 145 single-family houses to be built, according to an environmental report.

Project proponents are seeking approval at a time when some Inland Empire communities are pushing back against warehouses.

For example, the Redlands City Council recently enacted a moratorium on industrial projects on the city’s west side.

Earlier, Jurupa Valley limited warehouses to its Mira Loma and Agua Mansa areas, and adopted rules for other types of businesses that generate heavy truck traffic. And Pomona is considering a 45-day moratorium on new warehouses.

At the same time, online shopping is soaring and continues to drive a regional explosion in the logistics industry.

The Moreno Valley Trade Center arrived on the dais of the Planning Commission in fall, a few months after the city completed an overhaul of its general plan, a guide for future growth.

That document designated the 80-acre project site, west of Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus and Encelia avenues and mostly empty except for an 8.5-acre plant nursery, as a place for houses on half-acre lots.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2849 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 6 Hillwood is seeking permission to deviate from that new growth guide. In part because of that, Planning Commission member Jeff Sims called on the council to kill the project in a Saturday, June 11, letter. “Why have an approved General Plan and not honor it?” Sims wrote.

Two other projects in pipeline
There are two other warehouse projects in the early stages.

One is called Edgemont Commerce Center, a proposed 142,345-square-foot warehouse distribution building on approximately 7 acres southwest of Bay Avenue and Day Street.

The other is Heacock Commerce Center, a pair of industrial buildings totaling 874,000 square feet on 46 acres southeast of Gentian Avenue and Heacock Street.

City spokesperson Matthew Bramlett said in email Thursday that environmental reports are being prepared for both projects and it’s not known when they will be completed.

Like Moreno Valley Trade Center, the Heacock project can’t be built unless the city lets the developer deviate from the general plan. Warehouses are allowed at the Edgemont site, though a zone change is required to build one bigger than 50,000 square feet.

George Hague, conservation chair for the Moreno Valley Group of the Sierra Club, said those projects are also in the wrong place because they are near homes and schools.

The California Air Resources Board submitted letters to the city warning that each project has the potential to “expose nearby communities to elevated levels of air pollution.” In separate letters, Robert Krieger, chief of the California Air Resources Board’s Risk Reduction Branch, wrote that both projects are “in census tracts that score within the top 1 percent of State’s most impacted from air pollution from an environmental hazard and socioeconomic standpoint.”
Truck traffic, air pollution concerns
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2850 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 7 As for the Moreno Valley Trade Center, since the December hearing Hillwood has made changes.

The warehouse footprint has been reduced by 65,582 square feet to approximately 1,263,271 square feet, a city report states. A 35-foot-tall earthen berm, landscaped with trees and shrubs is to be built along Encelia Avenue. Truck access is to be limited to Eucalyptus Avenue. The number of loading docks is to be reduced by four, to 117, on the south side of the building, and by seven, to 97, on the north side.

Also, Hillwood has offered to build an 18-acre park at Redlands Boulevard and Ironwood Avenue that features two lighted soccer fields, a lighted baseball field, a playground, concession stand and exercise equipment.

Manuel and Arminda Del Alto, who live near Encelia Avenue, said improvements such as the berm don’t alleviate concerns. They moved to Moreno Valley 14 years ago from Ontario because they wanted to escape the warehouses going up there.
“My main concern is what the trucks and cars will put in the air,” said Manuel Del Alto, who has had a lung transplant.

Arminda Del Alto said they enjoy hearing birds and coyotes in the distance, and worry they will disappear.

Silvia Flores, who lives nearby with her husband, Joe, and two children ages 13 and 11, said she worries about pollution and traffic.
“It’s going to be terrible to have all these trucks,” Flores said.

The environmental report states that the logistics center would generate about 2,320 vehicle trips per day, including 1,436 by passenger vehicles and 885 by trucks. Under the fulfillment center scenario, the total would be 6,607 daily vehicle trips, including 5,750 passenger vehicles and 857 trucks.

Hillwood made several proposals earlier to soften the project’s impact on the neighborhood, including setting aside:
• $125,000 to establish an account to purchase of at least five electric-powered heavy trucks that drive the 60 Freeway corridor through Moreno Valley
• $64,000 to create an account for defraying up to 90% of neighbors’ costs of purchasing and installing noiseinsulation equipment, with a per-home limit of $8,000. Eleven homes on Galino Court, Essen Lane, Gershwin Way, Mozart Way, Strauss Lane and Shubert Street would be eligible for the payments. • $40,000 to establish an account to pay up to 90% of a homeowner’s cost of purchasing and installing air filtration systems, with a per-home limit of $5,000. The same 11 households would be eligible for such payments.

RELATED LINKS
• Massive Moreno Valley warehouse project still alive
• Has Moreno Valley reached its warehouse saturation point? • Pushback against warehouses in the Inland Empire gains momentum • $47 million settlement reached in World Logistics Center lawsuit • Moreno Valley council says yes — again — to World Logistics Center Despite the offers, Sims, the planning commissioner, said, “you can’t negate the smog, the traffic and the noise.” The warehouse building also would eclipse neighbors’ views, he said.

On most days, they can see foothills.
“On a clear day you can see the mountains looking up toward the Big Bear area,” Sims said. If the project goes in, he said, “all we will be able to see is a big wall looking to the north.” F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2851 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) 8 F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2852 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: sherylgleason
To: Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Martinez; Cheylynda Barnard; City Manager"s Office_DG; City Clerk"s Dept_DG
Subject: I STILL Support Moreno Valley Trade Center
Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 12:51:44 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
I am writing in continued support of the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

This project will bring the residents of Moreno Valley a new sports park, infrastructure improvements, hundreds of good union jobs, and over 1,000 more will be created for operations.

This investment in Moreno Valley will bring benefits for decades to come.

Join me in expressing continued support for the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Thank you
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Gadhelaxy smartphone
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2853 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Darric
To: Ken Morin; Alvaro Valdivia; Andre Moye; Antonio Hoggins; Brian Jackson; Carolyn Valencik; Ceci Yahoo; Charles Ober; [email protected]; Cindy Ramos; Crys Tom; DAMON FOREMAN; David McAbee; Don McNicholas; Edna White; Ericka Partida; Eugene Wright; Jackie McGee; James Hagen; Jean Mims; Jesus Flores; John Hubbs; Jose Garcia; Jeff Sims; Karie Woodward; Ken Morin; Lisa Tuy; Liz Anderson; Margarita Valdivia; Maritza Torres; Mark & Donna Montgomery; Merrick; Nancy Altamirano; Pierre Overton; Ramona Zuniga Morales; Randy Thomas; Ray; Renee Smith; Richard Moreno; Richard White; Sharilyn Bankole; Terry Scheschy; Tom and Terri Thornsley; VERONICA Ramos; [email protected]; Darric Williams; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; [email protected]; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; City Manager"s Office_DG
Subject: April 18th Council Hearing on Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:25:57 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers;
The MVTC is case where the proximity to current affected residents is a major problem.

I believe that the people in the affected community should have the most credibility because we also represent the children to be affected by the decisions of people and interests that do not hold or care about the well-being of our community. The objective fact that we have to sit through 50+ paid shills of this MVBC political theatre is disappointing. There are always paid workers that claim to live amongst us or live in Moreno Valley at large to lobby for destructive and irreversible policy prescriptions for our neighborhood in the name of revenue and personal gain or greed. It is frustrating to listen to and deal with knowing those people who are for projects in our community do not live here. If the same questionable projects were dropped in their community they would disapprove. It is shocking to us that some things people believe are "Good for Moreno Valley". Really? Good for who? These outside interests wanting and praising this project as a net positive for Moreno Valley do not live in this community. This is not a good project in the current location... If you approve this project then you will want to approve the other adverse project because the ball is rolling... I would like not to assume that you care more about city revenue than the health and well-being of the people in your community.

If these developers are offering $500,000 to the city to develop in areas that will cause irreparable harm to the community then there must be something that is innately wrong with the project.

It does not fit in with this community and my children will pay the price for greed and power. You ran as Democrats that are supposed to care about the community and environment over corporate greed. Your constant disregard for being consistent about neglecting the need and forsaking the public trust is disturbing. But again objectively you are considering large warehouses that will not have many six-figure jobs and tons of low-wage jobs that are not making a liveable wage.This behavior that is being tolerated does not fit in with our progressive agenda and typifies the corporate monster that is allowed to propagate itself in retrospect to what you ran on as politicians and supposed protectors of the community.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2854 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Our AG Rob Bonta has also filed a lawsuit accusing Moreno Valley of violating environmental law. I cease to understand why the proponents of these actions fail to see the eminent devastation of an otherwise good family neighborhood being shuttered to usher in "TAX DOLLARS" instead of maintaining a good quality of living for the affected residents.

They framed their solutions to somehow be a net benefit to us considering their proximity. It is disinformation/misinformation at best in the same vein as CNN and/or Fox News anchors stating their opinion as facts. They are gaslighting our community by continuing along with this comedy of errors. We have made our concerns known and have not received any satisfactory resolutions to those concerns.

1. Traffic in our neighborhood

2. Noise abatement from offending businesses

3. Traffic mitigation where that disaster area called a roundabout on Redlands located Redlands Blvd., especially if more trucks are going to be on it

4. Why do we need another warehouse in MV when other cities have placed moratoriums on them?

5. Jobs they claim to create are all low-wage jobs. We do not need those kinds of jobs.

6. Why are you offering to build a park (Not near us, I might add) if this project is a net positive for Moreno Valley?
At the end of the day, I like business and growth. Just not at the expense of my home, children, and the overall well-being of our community. This project cannot exist in its current plan. All involved need to go back to the drawing board and create a community master plan that does not infringe on residents or develop businesses that the residents will use. Not all F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2855 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) business is good business. I expect that the city council maintains its rejection of this project.

There are other opportunities for business without the downsides of what we are currently present with.
--
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
--
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
Fax 810.963.0303
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2856 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Darric
To: Ken Morin; Alvaro Valdivia; Andre Moye; Antonio Hoggins; Brian Jackson; Carolyn Valencik; Ceci Yahoo; Charles Ober; [email protected]; Cindy Ramos; Crys Tom; DAMON FOREMAN; David McAbee; Don McNicholas; Edna White; Ericka Partida; Eugene Wright; Jackie McGee; James Hagen; Jean Mims; Jesus Flores; John Hubbs; Jose Garcia; Jeff Sims; Karie Woodward; Ken Morin; Lisa Tuy; Liz Anderson; Margarita Valdivia; Maritza Torres; Mark & Donna Montgomery; Merrick; Nancy Altamirano; Pierre Overton; Ramona Zuniga Morales; Randy Thomas; Ray; Renee Smith; Richard Moreno; Richard White; Sharilyn Bankole; Terry Scheschy; Tom and Terri Thornsley; VERONICA Ramos; [email protected]; Darric Williams; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; [email protected]; City Clerk"s Dept_DG; City Manager"s Office_DG
Subject: Re: April 18th Council Hearing on Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:27:11 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers;
The MVTC is case where the proximity to current affected residents is a major problem.

I believe that the people in the affected community should have the most credibility because we also represent the children to be affected by the decisions of people and interests that do not hold or care about the well-being of our community. The objective fact that we have to sit through 50+ paid shills of this MVTC political theatre is disappointing. There are always paid workers that claim to live amongst us or live in Moreno Valley at large to lobby for destructive and irreversible policy prescriptions for our neighborhood in the name of revenue and personal gain or greed. It is frustrating to listen to and deal with knowing those people who are for projects in our community do not live here. If the same questionable projects were dropped in their community they would disapprove. It is shocking to us that some things people believe are "Good for Moreno Valley". Really? Good for who? These outside interests wanting and praising this project as a net positive for Moreno Valley do not live in this community. This is not a good project in the current location... If you approve this project then you will want to approve the other adverse project because the ball is rolling... I would like not to assume that you care more about city revenue than the health and well-being of the people in your community.

If these developers are offering $500,000 to the city to develop in areas that will cause irreparable harm to the community then there must be something that is innately wrong with the project.

It does not fit in with this community and my children will pay the price for greed and power.You ran as Democrats that are supposed to care about the community and environment over corporate greed. Your constant disregard for being consistent about neglecting the need and forsaking the public trust is disturbing. But again objectively you are considering large warehouses that will not have many six-figure jobs and tons of low-wage jobs that are not making a liveable wage.This behavior that is being tolerated does not fit in with our progressive agenda and typifies the corporate monster that is allowed to propagate itself in retrospect to what you ran on as politicians and supposed protectors of the community.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2857 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) Our AG Rob Bonta has also filed a lawsuit accusing Moreno Valley of violating environmental law. I cease to understand why the proponents of these actions fail to see the eminent devastation of an otherwise good family neighborhood being shuttered to usher in "TAX DOLLARS" instead of maintaining a good quality of living for the affected residents.

1. Traffic in our neighborhood

2. Noise abatement from offending businesses

3. Traffic mitigation where that disaster area called a roundabout on Redlands located Redlands Blvd., especially if more trucks are going to be on it

4. Why do we need another warehouse in MV when other cities have placed moratoriums on them?

5. Jobs they claim to create are all low-wage jobs. We do not need those kinds of jobs.

6. Why are you offering to build a park (Not near us, I might add) if this project is a net positive for Moreno Valley?
At the end of the day, I like business and growth. Just not at the expense of my home, children, and the overall well-being of our community. This project cannot exist in its current plan. All involved need to go back to the drawing board and create a community master plan that does not infringe on residents or develop businesses that the residents will use. Not all F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2858 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) business is good business. I expect that the city council maintains its rejection of this project.

There are other opportunities for business without the downsides of what we are currently present with.
--
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:25 PM Darric <[email protected]> wrote:

Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers;
The MVTC is case where the proximity to current affected residents is a major problem.

I believe that the people in the affected community should have the most credibility because we also represent the children to be affected by the decisions of people and interests that do not hold or care about the well-being of our community. The objective fact that we have to sit through 50+ paid shills of this MVBC political theatre is disappointing. There are always paid workers that claim to live amongst us or live in Moreno Valley at large to lobby for destructive and irreversible policy prescriptions for our neighborhood in the name of revenue and personal gain or greed. It is frustrating to listen to and deal with knowing those people who are for projects in our community do not live here. If the same questionable projects were dropped in their community they would disapprove. It is shocking to us that some things people believe are "Good for Moreno Valley". Really? Good for who? These outside interests wanting and praising this project as a net positive for Moreno Valley do not live in this community. This is not a good project in the current location... If you approve this project then you will want to approve the other adverse project because the ball is rolling... I would like not to assume that you care more about city revenue than the health and well-being of the people in your community.

If these developers are offering $500,000 to the city to develop in areas that will cause irreparable harm to the community then there must be something that is innately wrong with the project.It does not fit in with this community and my children will pay the price for greed and power. You ran as Democrats that are supposed to care about the community and environment over corporate greed. Your constant disregard for being consistent about neglecting the need and forsaking the public trust is disturbing. But again objectively you are considering large warehouses that will not have many six-figure jobs and tons of low-wage jobs that are not making a liveable wage.This behavior that is being tolerated does not fit in with our progressive agenda and typifies the corporate monster that is allowed to propagate itself in retrospect to what you ran on as politicians and supposed protectors of the community.

Our AG Rob Bonta has also filed a lawsuit accusing Moreno Valley of violating environmental law. I cease to understand why the proponents of these actions fail to see the eminent devastation of an otherwise good family neighborhood being shuttered to usher in F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2859 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) "TAX DOLLARS" instead of maintaining a good quality of living for the affected residents.

They never talk about family, kids, traffic, noise, or air quality in the local community.

They only talk about jobs. Low-paying warehouse jobs. Why is that? Because they do not live here off of Redlands. They have no interest in our concerns about why this project's location and proximity to our community is a net negative.

We are very disappointed that the developer in the 11th hour wishes to gain an audience with our community to attempt to tell the council that we agree with this project. Rest assured this is not the case. The developer has stood up a website www.moreformv.com which does not address pollution, noise, and traffic and does not directly address our concerns legitimately. They framed their solutions to somehow be a net benefit to us considering their proximity. It is disinformation/misinformation at best in the same vein as CNN and/or Fox News anchors stating their opinion as facts. They are gaslighting our community by continuing along with this comedy of errors. We have made our concerns known and have not received any satisfactory resolutions to those concerns.

1. Traffic in our neighborhood

2. Noise abatement from offending businesses

3. Traffic mitigation where that disaster area called a roundabout on Redlands located Redlands Blvd., especially if more trucks are going to be on it

4. Why do we need another warehouse in MV when other cities have placed moratoriums on them?

5. Jobs they claim to create are all low-wage jobs. We do not need those kinds of jobs.

6. Why are you offering to build a park (Not near us, I might add) if this project is a net positive for Moreno Valley?
At the end of the day, I like business and growth. Just not at the expense of my home, children, and the overall well-being of our community. This project cannot exist in its current plan. All involved need to go back to the drawing board and create a community master plan that does not infringe on residents or develop businesses that the residents will use. Not all business is good business. I expect that the city council maintains its rejection of this project. There are other opportunities for business without the downsides of what we are currently present with.

F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2860 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) --
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
--
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
Fax 810.963.0303
--
Darric V. Williams
Cell 951.634.9143
Fax 810.963.0303
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2861 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jeff Sims
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Moreno Valley Mayor; Elena Baca-Santa Cruz; Edward A. Delgado; David Marquez; Cheylynda Barnard; Sean P. Kelleher; Gabriel Diaz Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: April 18th Council Hearing on Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) & city council email addresses Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 12:47:32 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons,
April 18 the Moreno Valley Trade Center ("MVTC") is again on your agenda to consider overturning your Planning Commissions October 28, 2021 unanimous denial of the project.

At the December 7, 2021 Council appeal hearing after hearing significant public comments, the public hearing formally closed, and after council deliberation, then Mayor Gutierrez indicated "it didn't seem as if there was support for the project." Instead of taking the vote, he suggested a continuance to a date uncertain. This was motioned and approved 3-1. Here we are close to a year and half later and now the matter is back.

During the council deliberation on December 7, 2021 Councilpersons Delgado, Cabrera, and Marquez made the following comments:

Councilperson Marquez: "praised the project but asked when the city would cease approving warehouses in residential areas."
Councilperson Cabrera: "he explained the decision was difficult. He agreed that good paying jobs are necessary. He added that the issue lies in determining whether the economic benefits outweigh all of the negative impacts.......He acknowledged the extensive work performed by Hillwood to mitigate a lot of the negative issues, but explained the location is the crux of the issue. He expressed his desire that there were no docks or truck parking on the south side of the building." Councilperson Delgado: "stated Hillwood's proposal has exceeded expectations. He indicated the project would be better suited in a different area.....He expressed he would fully support the project if were located elsewhere." To read the minutes in whole, refer to the City's website.

As on December 7, 2021 the Hillwood's MVTC project continues to propose:

1. Putting a massive 1.3 MSF logistics warehouse with associated traffic and pollution (noise and air) on R-2 zoned property directly adjacent to existing R-2 and R-3 F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2862 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) homes. To put into perspective, the MVTC building size is in area is larger than the Moreno Valley Mall.

2. A project that continues to fail to adequately mitigate significant environmental impacts. The email from George Hauge below provides information about that.

3. A project layout that has not changed. It continues to propose a 1.3 million SF warehouse with truck docks on both the south (neighborhood side) and north side.

Directly ignoring then Councilperson, now Mayor Cabrera's comments during December 7, 2021 deliberations.

4. A project that will build a 40-foot-wide private truck roadway parallel to Encelia (around 250 ft. from existing homes along Encelia) for truck traffic to circulate between the truck docks on the north and south side of the building and to access outlets onto Eucalyptus. Based on the plans if you were standing at the intersection of Mozart and Encelia, there will be a 35' +/- landscaped berm and around 15 ft. below the top of berm on the MVTC side of the berm will be the private truck road.

From the road going north towards the proposed warehouse will be a 14 ft. tall wall, then truck/trailer parking and loading docks, then the 40 ft. (or 100 ft.) building. Of note the exhaust stacks of the trucks on the private road will be at approximately the same height of the top of the berm. This berm will be used 24/7 and generate noise and air pollution for the neighborhood to put up with.

5. The proposed 35 ft. berm and building will blot out existing north looking view sheds from the neighborhood.

6. The Developer has made no additional mitigation offers for the affected neighborhood such as widening Redlands between Encelia and Dracaea, or putting in traffic signal at either Dracaea or Encelia/Redlands. The only direct mitigating offer to the adjacent neighborhood is for addition at the developer's expense of air filtration units, and sound proofing on some of the existing homes on the south side of Encelia, and power washing of the exterior of some of the homes. The later apparently only during construction. On its face the obvious question is - why would air filtration and sound proofing be needed? We all know why - direct impacts of diesel soot and noise from the added traffic the MVTC places on the community.

7. A project necessitating an amendment of the City's approved General Plan (2040). The recently approved City General Plan (2040) shows the 80 acres where MVTC is proposed as R-2, consistent with the existing neighborhood. Approval of the project by the Council will require overturning the unanimous denial of the project by Planning Commission and approving a General Plan Amendment to change the zoning of the 80 acres from R-2 to business park/industrial. These actions differ from the recently approved warehouses in the Edgemont area, where 1) the buildings were smaller, and 2) the existing land use zoning already allowed this type of projects.

Approval of projects whereby their anticipated use knowingly creates noise, traffic, and air pollution from diesel trucks servicing the project should not be approved by residential zoned or existing residential areas. There should be some minimum buffer distance. The state of CA is attempting to create a 1,000 ft. buffer distance, but that has yet to be passed. Other area cities in the inland empire have put the brakes on warehouses due to traffic and environmental issues. With the World Logistics Center (WLC) about to commence construction, it would seem Moreno Valley has more than enough warehouse land use for decades to come and don't need to add more with the MVTC. This council should respect its approved General Plan and not amend it F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2863 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) with putting incompatible land uses directly next to one another. There is 2,800 acres of WLC to build and supply all the supposed living wage jobs touted with logistic careers.

8. A project that exacerbates traffic congestion and lowering of the quality of life of all Moreno Valley citizens. Traffic getting in and out of MV is tough now. The 2,800- acre WLC and its impacts on traffic have yet to be absorbed. MVTC will be additive to the massive cumulative traffic impacts this community has to deal with. As a note, the elevation difference between the 60/215 interchange and 60/91 interchange plays a significant role in the congestion and travel time delays currently experienced. The state of CA recently improved the 60 through the badlands, but that stretch of 60 between WLC Parkway and 60/10 interchange is plagued with the same problem as the stretch between Moreno Valley and Riverside.....grade difference. Trucks cannot go as fast as cars going up and down grades when loaded. This we all know as fact. The traffic studies fail miserably to account for this. We Moreno Valley citizens will experience increased traffic going west and east on 60 just to get around in MV with the WLC and MVTC (if approved). There will also be increased air pollution due to the additional truck traffic attracted to the area by the MVTC. An 18-acre park doesn't fix this when your commute time increases substantially. When will you or your children have time to run around on a sports park after spending hours of your life on a weekly basis sitting on the freeway breathing diesel soot?
So, what is different now than what Hillwood has proposed over the last year and a half? The project and its impacts remain the same. The difference now is Hillwood has put on the table an offer of a $500,000 cash contribution to the Moreno Valley Community Fund, and a contribution of an 18-acre sports park. Hillwood has witnessed the controversy and opposition of its project at the Planning Commission, where it was unanimously denied. Hillwood also witnessed the lack of support during council deliberations at the December 7, 2021 appeal. The bottom line is Hillwood can't mitigate the significant impacts of the MVTC and now seek your support of its approval in other ways.

Their way is to put these offers/incentives on the table as "mitigating public benefits".

There are various terms for what Hillwood is doing to
curry favorable results, but I guess the acceptable term nowadays in politics is "influencing."
At the end of the day if approved, the council will be provided hard hat wearing, gold shovel holding, yellow ribbon cutting photo ops as a reward for a yes vote. Maybe people living in other areas of the City may think getting these incentives is a good thing and will indicate their support of you......but remember they won't have to live with this project literally directly next to them.

Approval of the MVTC comes at the direct cost of one of the existing nicer large lot neighborhoods in Moreno Valley. You can deny the MVTC entitlements and easily point to the coming new jobs and economic benefits the WLC will provide as news indicates it is soon to begin construction. Let the 80-acres where MVTC is proposed be built as residential and let the property taxes and development fees from that support funding of a park. Perhaps transitional density of residential on the 80-acres rather than all R-2 would enable this. The City benefits from higher property taxes and people shopping in Moreno Valley. Added residential rather than more warehouse does that.

You were elected to protect and enhance the quality of life for all Moreno Valley F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2864 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) residents. The MVTC is not located in an appropriate location, and it will have direct harm on the existing citizens living in homes adjacent to where the MVTC is proposed. In the past the council denied approval of the Prologis Project adjacent this same existing residential neighborhood. This was responsible and the City continued to move forward despite the loss of the denied Prologis logistic/warehouse square footage. On December 7, 2021 three of the four council appeared to have real concerns about the location of the MVTC and the impacts if would have on the same existing residential, similar to the council when the Prologis project was considered. Hillwood though continues to push forward. MVTC location is in a residential area, there will be a quarter mile or so of loading docks proposed on the south side of the building, and the existing residential will be directly harmed by air and noise pollution, loss of views, and traffic. The rest of the City residents not living next to the MVTC will get the negative harm by more truck traffic, air and noise pollution, and added commute time......all negatively impacting the quality of life you were elected to protect and enhance. Let Moreno Valley absorb what it already has approved in warehouse/logistic uses......when is enough, enough? With the December 7, 2021 council meeting hearing the appeal the public hearing was formally closed. Will this Council reopen the public hearing? Last - would you want a council to vote to approve the MVTC if your home was directly next to it?
Uphold your Planning Commissions unanimous denial of the MVTC Project.

Jeff Sims
Moreno Valley Resident
-----Original Message-----
From: George Hague <[email protected]>
To: Joe Bunker <[email protected]>
Cc: Ken Morin <[email protected]>; Alvaro Valdivia <[email protected]>; Andre Moye <[email protected]>; Antonio Hoggins <[email protected]>; Brian Jackson <[email protected]>; Carolyn Valencik <[email protected]>; Ceci Yahoo <[email protected]>; Charles Ober <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Cindy Ramos <[email protected]>; Crys Tom <[email protected]>; DAMON FOREMAN <[email protected]>; David McAbee <[email protected]>; Don McNicholas <[email protected]>; Edna White <[email protected]>; Ericka Partida <[email protected]>; Eugene Wright <[email protected]>; Jackie McGee <[email protected]>; James Hagen <[email protected]>; Jean Mims <[email protected]>; Jesus Flores <[email protected]>; John Hubbs <[email protected]>; Jose Garcia <[email protected]>; Jeff Sims <[email protected]>; Karie Woodward <[email protected]>; Ken Morin <[email protected]>; Lisa Tuy <[email protected]>; Liz Anderson <[email protected]>; Margarita Valdivia <[email protected]>; Maritza Torres <[email protected]>; Mark & Donna Montgomery <[email protected]>; Merrick <[email protected]>; Nancy Altamirano <[email protected]>; Pierre Overton <[email protected]>; Ramona Zuniga Morales <[email protected]>; Randy Thomas <[email protected]>; Ray <[email protected]>; Renee Smith <[email protected]>; Richard Moreno <[email protected]>; Richard White <[email protected]>; Sharilyn Bankole <[email protected]>; Shelly Mesa <[email protected]>; Terry Scheschy <[email protected]>; Tom and Terri Thornsley F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2865 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) <[email protected]>; VERONICA Ramos <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Fri, Apr 7, 2023 11:30 pm
Subject: April 18th Council Hearing on Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) & city council email addresses
Good morning/afternoon Neighbors,
This is your neighborhood = Speak Up and Show Up!!!
The 1.26 million sq ft Moreno Valley Trade Center massive warehouse which could be at least 100 feet high is again scheduled before the city council = Tuesday November 15th at 6 pm. It would be located at SW Redlands Blvd & Eucalyptus Ave. This is where Hall Nursery is/was located and where the roundabout is on Redlands Blvd. You can help make a difference = Please Do!
It is proposed on land zoned for homes on half acre lots and across Encelia Street from family homes to the south.

When the project couldn’t protect the neighborhood and the environment, they decided a park at the SE corner of Ironwood Ave/Redlands Blvd could be offered to “INFLUENCE" the council to get at least three votes, but they fail to explain the park will be next to a city designated diesel truck route with all its harmful pollution impacting the children using the sports park — active use of the sports park will result in children breathing in deeply the health impacting diesel pollution. The 40 million sq ft World Logistics Center warehouse project has just begun moving forward with its project and will be using Redlands Blvd for some of its 13,000 daily diesel truck trips as will the MVTC. The sports park's tall lights will light up much of NE Moreno Valley with its nighttime glow many days of the week.

If the project is approved, you can expect the Pilot Travel Center/Truck Stop with its many hundreds of daily diesel trucks will be approved directly across Eucalyptus Ave from the MVTC.

If some of the above is approved, you will experience the roundabout trying to handle several large diesel trucks every minute throughout most of the day and the out-of-date Redlands Blvd interchange will become a nightmare.

You and each of our neighbors need to email Each council member at least once and ideally more using their email addresses found below before the Tuesday April 18th council hearing. It is usually better to send it to each one individually, but the main thing is to send something.

Moreno Valley City Council Members Email Addresses
Mayor Ulises Cabrera ([email protected])
District 1 -Elena Baca Santa Cruz ([email protected])
District 2 -Edward A. Delgado ([email protected])
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2866 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) District 3 -David Marquez ([email protected])
District 4 - Cheylynda Barnard - [email protected]
If you also email both planner Gabriel Diaz ([email protected]) and planner Sean P. Kelleher ([email protected]) before this Wednesday April 12th to the City Council members, it should get into the agenda packet for the council and public to read Just make sure they know it is for the City Council members concerning the Moreno Valley Trade Center it should get to them. I would also cc the City Clerk ([email protected]) to make sure it is in the public record.

EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE TRYING TO FIT THEIR VERY LARGE WAREHOUSE ON LAND ZONED FOR

HOMES AND ACROSS THE STREET FROM HOMES THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT AREAS THEY

HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO COMES CLOSE TO MITIGATING ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING FROM THEIR OWN FINAL Environmental Impact Report (EIR):
"5.1 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF

THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED
The CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR disclose the significant environmental effects of a project which cannot be avoided if the proposed project is implemented (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(b)). As described in detail in Section 4.0, Environmental Analysis, of this EIR, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in impacts to the environment that cannot be reduced to below a level of significance after the consideration of Project design features, compliance with applicable federal, State and local regulations, and the application of the feasible mitigation measures identified in this EIR. The significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level below thresholds of significance consist of the following:
o Aesthetics: Implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block views of Reche Canyon and the Badlands (and the San Bernardino Mountains beyond) from the segment of Encelia Avenue that abuts the Project site on the south (west of Shubert Street).

Also, implementation of the Project would mostly or completely block scenic views of Mount Russell and its foothills from the segment of Eucalyptus Avenue that abuts the Project site. This would be a significant and unavoidable direct impact. o Air Quality (Air Quality Management Plan Conflict): The Project would emit air pollutants (NOX) that would contribute to a delay in the attainment of federal and State ozone standards in the SCAB. Because the Project requires a General Plan Amendment, it also would exceed the growth projections contained in SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. As such, the Project would conflict with and could obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Project impacts due to a conflict with the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP would be significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis.
o Air Quality (Criteria Pollutant Emissions): After the application of Project design features, mandatory regulatory requirements, and feasible mitigation measures, Project-related NOX emissions during long-term operation of the Project would remain above the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds. Accordingly, Project-related emissions would not meet SCAQMD air quality standards and contribute to the non-attainment of ozone standards in the F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2867 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) SCAB. Therefore, Project operational-related impacts due to NOX emissions would be significant and unavoidable on a direct and cumulatively-considerable basis. o Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG Emissions Generation): Project-related GHG emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold for GHG emissions and would result in a cumulatively-considerable impact to the environment." (page 5-1 in MVTC Final EIR)
Neighbors Helping Neighbors,
George Hague
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2868 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Jeff Sims
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Gabriel Diaz
Subject: Fw: Public Hearing April 18, 2023
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:17:16 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Please also add this as well to the public comment re MVTC thanks
Jeff Sims
Sent from AOL on Android
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Jeff Sims" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Public Hearing April 18, 2023
Mayor Cabrera,
I have the same concerns as Mr. Thornsley. A project of the magnitude of the MVTC needs to be fully vetted in a transparent manner. Hillwood has their website and pro-MVTC advocacy going in full force to gather up support. They have pulled out the stops offering "community benefits" - $500K in cash and a park to somehow mask the significant environmental impacts it can't mitigate.

I ask you to go back and watch the video of you and your fellow council members during the December 7, 2021 deliberations. MVTC has addressed none of the actual concerns you, Delgado, and Marquez brought up. The project may have been denied that night had there been a vote, but Guiterrez threw out a lifeline by closing the hearing and then continuing the matter.

The project hasn't changed. The harm it will cause to the neighborhood directly next to it hasn't changed. Only the cash and park.

Your advisory Planning Commission unanimously denied MVTC in October 2021. It upheld the recently approved General Plan (2040) to not approve an amendment to allow incompatible land uses directly next to each other.

The public should not be confused, and the vote should be made transparently.

The Public Hearing for this matter should be reopened.

Jeff Sims
(951) 809-3308
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2869 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) -----Original Message-----
From: Tom Thornsley <[email protected]>
To: Ulises Cabrera <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Apr 12, 2023 11:23 am
Subject: Public Hearing April 18, 2023
Mayor Cabrera,
I, and many others, worried that you will not permit further public comments on the Moreno Valley Trade Center Appeal hearing on April 18.It is my understanding that when the City Council last heard the appeal of the Moreno Valley Trade Center the public comment portion of the hearing was closed then Council discussion was continued just before a vote would have occurred. That might technically mean that the Council only has to reconvene and vote on this project. However, that last hearing was almost a year and a half ago and a lot has changed since then, including the addition of a new Council Member not involved with this issue. Additionally, the developer has put forth new incentives for garnering approval, a new development agreement has been prepared, and likely some other changes to the project plan.

After all tht time, memories have faded and the developer has had and extensive amount of time to privately persuade each Council Member. I expect each Council Member to be forthcoming about how much contact they have had with the developer over the past 17 months. In all fairness to everyone involved, next Tuesday's appeal hear should be a reboot, starting over from the beginning and all community members should be permitted to speak on this project, prior to any Council consideration and voting.

Respectively,
Tom Thornsley
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2870 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: George Hague
To: Gabriel Diaz
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Comments on the Moreno Valley Trade Center -- 3 Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:27:00 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good afternoon City council members
I hope you will read each of the city adopted goals found below and think of how they apply to the Moreno Valley Trade Center (MVTC) — ensuring things like a smooth transition and sensitive to surrounding context as well as others are never addressed when placing warehousing so close to sensitive receptors like family homes. These Goals should not be applied only when it is convenient and avoided when they are not.

City Goals Not Being addressed on warehouse project reviews = Please read each one found below.

Noise (N)
Goal N-1 Design for pleasant healthy sound environment conducive to living and working
Goal N-2 Ensure that noise does not have a substantial, adverse effect on quality of life in the community.

Environmental Justice (EJ)
Goal EJ-1 Reduce pollution exposure and improve community health.

Land Use and Community Character (LCC)
Goal LCC-3: Build a distinctive sense of place and pride in Moreno Valley.

LCC.3-1 Insist on high-quality development that is sensitive to surrounding context throughout the city and particularly in centers and corridors.

LCC.3-2 Use development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another.

LCC.3-17 Screen and buffer nonresidential projects to protect adjacent F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2871 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) residential property and other sensitive land uses when necessary to mitigate noise, glare and other adverse effects on adjacent uses.

The planning Department needs to prove all of these have been met by all warehouse projects and that includes the Moreno Valley Trade Center.

Sincerely,
George Hague
F.2.y
Packet Pg. 2872 Attachment: City Council - Public Comments Packet 3 of 3 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) From: Mark Ostoich
To: Mike Lee; Manuel A. Mancha; Sean P. Kelleher
Cc: Steve Quintanilla; "Morse, Scott"; "Grace, John"; Mark Ostoich Subject: FW: Moreno Valley
Date: Thursday, March 16, 2023 12:45:21 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
From: Mark Ostoich <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 12:44 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Steve Quintanilla' <[email protected]>; 'Morse, Scott' <[email protected]>; 'Grace, John' <[email protected]>; Mark Ostoich <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Moreno Valley
Gentlemen,
I am the attorney for Moreno Valley Trade Center, LLC, the proponent of the Moreno Valley Trade Center Project. Moreno Valley Trade Center, LLC hereby requests that you agendize the following actions for consideration by the City Council on April 18, 2023:

1. Adopt a Resolution approving and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Moreno Valley Trade Center Project;

2. Adopt a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment (PEN 19-091), Tentative Parcel map (PEN 19-0234), and Plot Plan (PEN 19-0193) and the respective conditions of approval, based on the recitals, evidence and findings contained in the administrative record of the proceedings;

3. Introduce an Ordinance approving Change of Zone (PEN 19-0192) and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas and the related conditions of approval, based on the recitals, evidence and findings contained in the administrative record of the proceedings;

4. Adopt a Resolution finding and determining pursuant to senate Bill 330, that approval of the Moreno Valley Trade Center project will not result in a net loss of residential capacity; and

5. Adopt a Resolution accepting Community Benefits and a Community Park on behalf of the City of Moreno Valley, as offered by the Moreno Valley Trade Center, LLC and set forth in a Community Park Acquisition and Improvement Agreement and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement and approve any subsequent amendments, subject to the consent of the City Attorney consistent with the intent and purposes of the Agreement.

We look forward to discussing the details of this request with you.

Thank you, Mark Ostoich

1. Privileged and Confidential Communication. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential or subject to the attorney client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you may not use, disclose, F.2.z
Packet Pg. 2873 Attachment: Request for Public Hearing on April 18, 2023 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) print, copy or disseminate the same. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this message. 2. Notice re Tax Advice. Any tax advice contained in this email, including any attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other recipient for the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties that may otherwise be imposed by the IRS, or (b) supporting, promoting, marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter to any third party. 3. Transmission of Viruses. Although this communication, and any attached documents or files, are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free, and the sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. 4. Security of Email. Electronic mail is sent over the public internet and may not be secure. Thus, we cannot guarantee the privacy or confidentiality of such information.

F.2.z
Packet Pg. 2874 Attachment: Request for Public Hearing on April 18, 2023 (6209 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park)

Moreno Valley City CouncilApril 18, 2023

Moreno Valley City Council
April 18, 2023