Agenda packet, regular meeting — Moreno Valley City Council, May 2, 2023 (part 4 of 11)

financing district, and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Participation
in the NPDES program requires an annual payment of the
annual special tax, assessment, rate or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the City Council action to consider the ballot/annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the ballot/annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/rate/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/rate/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings. (MC 3.50.050).

Alternatively, the condition can be satisfied by the Developer funding an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation, as calculated by Special Districts Admin staff. The Developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to satisfy this condition.
143. Park Maintenance Funding. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or fund an endowment) to provide an ongoing funding source for the continued maintenance, enhancement, and/or retrofit of parks, open spaces, linear parks, and/or trails systems.

This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Certificate of Occupancy. This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

Alternatively, the condition can be satisfied by the Developer funding an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation, as calculated by Special Districts Admin staff. The Developer must F.1.y
Packet Pg. 407
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions [Revision 1] (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan (PEN21-0326)

Page 26 ends

contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to satisfy this condition.
144. Maintenance Services Funding. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or use the alternative identified at the time of the special financing district formation) to provide an ongoing funding source for the operation and maintenance of public improvements and/or services associated with impacts of the development. This condition will only be applicable provided said district is under development at the time this project applies for the 1st Building Permit.

An alternative to satisfying this funding source will be identified at such time as a special financing district has been established. At the time of development, the developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to determine if this condition is applicable. 145. Public Safety Funding. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or use the alternative identified at the time of the special financing district formation ) to provide an ongoing funding source for Public Safety services, which may include but is not limited to Police, Fire Protection, Paramedic Services, Park Rangers, and Animal Control services. This condition will only be applicable provided said district is under development at the time this project applies for the 1st Building Permit.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan (PEN21-0326)

Page 27 ends

financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee
levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

An alternative to satisfying this condition will be identified at such time as a special financing district has been established. At the time of development, the developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to determine if this condition is applicable. 146. Bioretention Basin Maintenance. The ongoing maintenance of any bioretention basin, or
other like water quality BMP constructed in the public right of way, shall be the responsibility of a property owner association or the property owner. 147. Maintenance Period. The Developer, or the Developer’s successors or assignees shall be responsible for all parkway, traffic circle, open space and/or median landscape maintenance and utility costs, etc. for a period no less than one (1) year commencing from the time all items of work have been completed to the satisfaction of Landscape Services staff as per the City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department Landscape Design Guidelines, or until such time as the City accepts maintenance responsibilities.
148. ECSD Street Light Acknowledgement. Prior to the 1st Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer must submit an acknowledgement from Edgemont Community Services District confirming it has accepted all street lights required to be installed by this project into its system for ongoing maintenance. Said acknowledgement must be emailed to [email protected]. ECSD can be reached at 951.784.2411, P.O.

Box 5436, Riverside, CA 92514.
149. Independent Utilities. Parkway, median, slope, traffic circle and/or open space landscape areas included within a special financing district are required to have independent utility systems, including but not limited to water, electric, and telephone services. An independent irrigation controller and pedestal will also be required. Combining utility systems with existing or future landscape areas that are not within the same CFD 2014-01 tax rate layers or funding program (e.g. NPDES) will not be permitted.

F.1.y
Packet Pg. 409
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions [Revision 1] (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan (PEN21-0326)

Page 28 ends

150. Landscape Inspection Fees. Inspection fees for the monitoring of landscape installation associated
with the City of Moreno Valley maintained landscaping are due prior to the required pre-construction meeting. (MC 3.32.040) 151. Landscape Guidelines. Plans for parkway, median, slope, traffic circle, and/or open space
landscape areas designated in the project's Conditions of Approval for incorporation into a City Coordinated landscape maintenance program, shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department Landscape Design Guidelines. The guidelines are available on the City's website at www.moval.org or from Landscape Services (951.413.3480 or [email protected]).
152. Maintenance Responsibility. The ongoing maintenance of any landscaping required to be installed behind the curb shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 153. Landscape Plan Check Fees. Plan check fees for review of parkway/median, open space,
and/or traffic circle landscape plans for improvements that shall be maintained by the City of Moreno Valley are due upon the first plan submittal. (MC

3.32.040)
154. Parkway, open space, traffic circle, and/or median landscaping specified in the project’s Conditions of Approval shall be constructed in compliance with the approved landscape plans and completed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy/Building Final for this project. 155. Mylars of the landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted on hanging tab to Landscape Services.

Transportation Engineering Division
156. Conditions of approval may be modified or added if a phasing plan is submitted for this development.
157. All project driveways shall conform to City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans No.

MVSI-112C-0 for Commercial
Driveway Approaches. Access at the driveways shall
be allowed as follows:
• Old 215 Frontage Road driveways: right-turn in/out only. Access restriction shall be accomplished with the construction of a raised median on Old 215 Frontage Road. 158. All proposed on-site traffic signing and striping should be accordance with the latest California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). 159. Old 215 Frontage Road is designated as a 4-Lane Divided Arterial F.1.y
Packet Pg. 410
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions [Revision 1] (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan (PEN21-0326)

Page 29 ends

(110’RW/86’CC) per City Standard Plan No. MVSI-103A-0. Any improvements undertaken by this project shall be consistent with the City’s standards for this facility. Additional improvements shall be required to transition from ultimate street width along the project frontage to existing edge of pavement north and south of the project site.
160. Edgemont Street is designated as a Modified Local (60’RW/36’CC) per City Standard Plan No. MVSI-107A-0. Any improvements undertaken by this project shall be consistent with the City’s standards for this facility. Additional improvements shall be required to transition from ultimate street width along the project frontage to existing edge of pavement north and south of the project site. 161. Prior to issuance of an encroachment permit for work within the public right-of-way, construction traffic
control plans prepared by a qualified, registered Civil or Traffic engineer shall be required for plan approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 162. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall coordinate with the City of
Riverside Public Works Department and purchase the necessary traffic signal appurtenance equipment for the improvement, as identified in the Cottonwood & Edgemont Warehouse Traffic Analysis, dated January 6, 2023 at the intersection of Old 215 Frontage Road and Eucalyptus Avenue. 163. Prior to final approval of any landscaping or monument sign plans, the project plans shall demonstrate
that sight distance at the project driveways conforms to City Standard Plan No. MVSI-164A, B, C-0.
164. Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans, a signing and striping plan shall
be prepared per City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans - Section 4 for all streets within the project area.
165. Prior to issuance of a Building Final or Certificate of Occupancy, all approved street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 166. Prior to issuance of a Building Final or Certificate of Occupancy, all approved signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards 167. Each gated entrance shall be provided with the following:
• A storage lane with a minimum of 75 feet queuing length for entering traffic. • Signing and striping.
• A separate pedestrian entry.

All of these features must be kept in working order.

PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
F.1.y
Packet Pg. 411
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions [Revision 1] (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan (PEN21-0326)

Page 30 ends

168. This project is subject to current Development Impact Fees.

F.1.y
Packet Pg. 412
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolutions [Revision 1] (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 752.3
631.0
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet631.00 315.48
Zoning Map Business Park
DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from the City of Moreno Valley GIS and Riverside County GIS. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. Riverside County and City of Moreno Valley will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting from the use of this map.

Notes:

Legend
2/24/2023Print Date:

Image Source: Nearmap
Zoning
Commercial
Center Mixed Use
Downtown Center
Corridor Mixed Use
Industrial/Business Park
Public Facilities
Highway Office/Commercial
Office
Business Flex
Large Lot Residential
Residential Agriculture 2 DU/AC
Residential 2 DU/AC
Suburban Residential
Multi-family
Open Space/Park
Master Plan of Trails
Bridge
Improved
Multiuse
Proposed
Regional
State
Road Labels
Parcels
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
F.1.z
Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Zoning Map (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

February 13, 2023

Julia Descoteaux, Senior Planner
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
PO Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552

Subject: EMWD Comments for th e Cottonwood and Edgemont Project Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration

Location: East side of Old 215 Frontage Road south of Cottonwood Avenue, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California.

Dear Ms. Julia Descoteaux:

Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) thanks you for the opportunity to comment on the Cottonwood and Edgemont Project, Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The project proposes the development of tw o light industrial buildings with a total combined building floor area of 99,630 square feet on an approximately 7.94 gross acre property (6.88 net acres).

The project would include cargo loading areas at each building, an enclosed truck court with loading docks on the eastern side of the proposed buildings, parking areas, landscaping, signage, and lighting.

EMWD offers the following comments:

To define the impact(s) on the environment and on existing EMWD facilities, and as development within this area occurs over time, the proponents of implementing development projects shall consult EMWD’s Development Services Department to compare proposed and existing water demands and sewer flows, and prepare a Design Conditions report (DC), formally known as the Plan of Service (POS), to detail all pertinent facilities necessary to serve such implementing development projects, resulting in an approved DC, prior to final design and plan check of such facilities.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) EMWD Comments
February 13, 2023

Page 2 ends

To help define EMWD’s Design Conditions, EMWD requires beginning dialogue with project proponents at an early stage in the site design and develo pment, via a one-hour complementary Due Diligence meeting. To set up this meeting the project propon ent should complete a Project Questionnaire (form NBD-058) and submit to EMWD. To download this form or for additional information, please visit our web page www.emwd.org, then select the “Developer” link, then select the “New Development Process Forms” link. This meeting will offer the following benefits:

1. Describe EMWD’s development process

2. Identify project scope and parameters

3. Provide a preliminary review of the project wi thin the context of existing infrastructure

4. Discuss potential candidacy for recycled water service

5. Identify project submittal requirements to start the Design Conditions review Following the Due Diligence meeting, and to proceed with a project, the Design Conditions will need to be developed by the developer’s engineer and re viewed/approved by EMWD prior to submitting improvement plans for Plan Check. The DC process and approval will provide the following:

1. Technical evaluation of the project’s de mands and existing system capacities

2. Identification of impacts to existing facilities

3. Identification of additional on-site and off-si te facilities, necessary to serve the project

4. Identification of easement requirements, if necessary

5. Identification of potential EMWD’s cost partic ipation in facility oversizing, if applicable If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Maroun El-Hage at (951) 928-3777, extension 4468 or by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Alfred Javier
Director of Environmental and Regulatory Compliance

ARJ: hs
Attachments: Copy of Public Notice
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 415
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 1 Julia Descoteaux
From: Vega, Jaqueline <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 3:11 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux
Subject: PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326
Warning:ExternalEmail–WatchforEmailRedFlags!
HelloJulia,

ThankyoufortransmittingtheabovereferencedprojecttoALUCforreview.Pleasenotethattheproposedprojectis locatedwithinzoneB1APZIIandC1oftheMarchAirReserveAIA.AdditionallyALUCreviewisnotrequiredbecausethe CityofMorenoValleyisconsistentwiththeMarchALUCPandCitystaffcanconducttherevi ewthemselves.
Also,pleasenotethatzoneB1APZIIrestrictsnonresidentialintensityto50peopleperaverageacreand100peopleper singleacre,andwealsosendproposedprojecttoAirforceforreviewduetotheAPZ.
ZoneC1restrictsnonͲresidentialinte nsityto100peopleperaverageacre,and250peoplepersingleacre.
Shouldyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactme.

Jackie Vega
Ur ban Regional Planner I

Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contai ned in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electroni c and printed, and contact the author immediately.

CountyofRiversideCalifornia
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 416
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 1 Victoria Castreje
From: George Hague <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 1:54 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux
Cc: City Clerk
Subject: Cottonwood & Edgemont (C&E) Comments = Warehouses replace farms as big rigs fill Inland Empire - Los Angeles Times --1
Warning:ExternalEmail–WatchforEmailRedFlags!
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-02-05/warehouses-big-rigs-fill-inland-empire-streets This article as well as all its links that it contains are incorporated fully by reference into these comments
Good afternoon Ms Descoteaux,
Re: Comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Cottonwood & Edgemont (C&E) warehouse project.

The article found below points out several of the problems with locating warehousing at the proposed location of the Cottonwood & Edgemont warehouses. With family homes within 18 feet to 28 feet from the project site and also very close to the the diesel trucks’ internal traffic pattern the cumulative impacts they bring will negatively impact those who live and work nearby. The projects’ external truck routes upon leaving/entering the freeway also will impact families in their homes and yards. The MND fails to analyze these impacts— direct, indirect and cumulative — as well as to all the homes/sensitive receptors on the perimeter of the project site.

The following are some quotes from the article in the link found above and also below my name that point out some of the negative impacts of the proposed Cottonwood & Edgemont warehouses:
“If you’re concerned about the health of the community, you’re not going to build a warehouse with diesel trucks coming in and out, spewing diesel particulate matter right next to the schools or right next to the homes,” she said. [California Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (D-Grand Terrace)]
"But smog in the Inland Empire — largely caused by big-rig exhaust — is the worst in the nation, according to the the American Lung Assn." “We know diesel exhaust is a killer,” said William Barrett, national senior director of clean air advocacy for the American Lung Assn. “It’s one of the most damaging things that your lungs can experience.”
"Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said he has been monitoring warehouse development across California for compliance with environmental rules." F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 2 “For too long, warehouses have proliferated throughout California with little consideration for the health and safety impacts on the surrounding communities,” he said in an emailed statement. “As a result of these poor land use decisions, many low-income communities and communities of color continue to be among the most pollution burdened in the state.” “A lot of time, kids wake up with bloody noses on their pillows,” she said. “We have the worst air quality. We have gridlock. We have streets and communities that were never built for global logistics. We’re basically building, on top of failed infrastructure, a global network.” (Amparo Munoz about her children)
The Sierra Club appreciates this opportunity to submit comments on another warehouse project next to family homes in Moreno Valley. Please keep us informed on all future documents and meetings related to this project.

Sincerely,
George Hague
Sierra Club
Moreno Valley Group
Conservation Chair
WarehouseboomtransformedInland
Empire.Arejobsworththe
environmentaldegradation?
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 418
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 3 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 4 A Walmart distribution center in Eastvale along I-15. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)
For decades, Bosch Dairy in Ontario, where three generations raised cattle, was a bucolic outpost with fields of cows and rows of eucalyptus to cut the driving wind that came down the Cajon Pass.

A few years ago, Bud Bosch noticed semitrailers occasionally rumbling along the two- lane rural road by his property. Soon, dozens were kicking up dust, night and day, plying roads made for tractors.

Bosch thought he had escaped the explosion of warehouse development that has wiped out farmland and open space. But the ecommerce boom of the pandemic accelerated the land grab, and the region became ever more hardscaped into the staging point for trains and trucks carrying goods from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to the rest of the nation.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 420
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 5 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 421
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 6 Bud Bosch, 58, at Bosch Dairy in Ontario.
(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
There are 170 million square feet of warehouses planned or under construction in the Inland Empire, according to a recent report by environmental groups. And despite fears of a recession, demand hasn’t ebbed.

But the rapidtransformation of semirural areas into barrens of concrete tilt-up “logistic parks” is encountering a backlash. Residents are questioning whether they want the region’s economy, health, traffic and general ambiance tied to a heavily polluting, low- wage industry that might one day pick up and leave as global trade routes shift.

Several Inland Empire cities, including Colton and Norco, have placed building moratoriums on warehouses, as has Pomona, which borders the region. Environmental groups are pushing Gov. Gavin Newsom to declare a state of emergency, hoping to keep new warehouses away from homes and schools, where heavy truck traffic can expose children to high levels of toxic diesel emissions that have been linked to respiratory illness.
“Warehouse-induced pollution has created a state of environmental injustice and a public health crisis in San Bernardino and Riverside counties,” dozens of labor, environmental and community groups said in a letter last month urging Newsom to implement a regionwide moratorium on warehouses.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 422
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 7 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 423
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 8 Trucks parked at a Walmart distribution center in Eastvale. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)
The group accused local politicians of environmental racism, ignoring health impacts while collecting donations from developers and their allies.

A spokesperson for Newsom said in an email to The Times that “California is taking urgent action to clean the air in communities hardest hit by pollution,” pointing to the governor’s order requiring heavy-duty truck manufacturers to transition to zero- emission vehicles by 2045. She did not say whether the governor supports a moratorium.

Local officials like San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman argue that a halt to building could have grave consequences.
“Lately, critics have called for warehouse moratoriums or outright bans. Their misguided proposals gloss over the real-world and draconian impact their potential bans would have on supply chains in local communities and the entire region,” he wrote in an opinion piece in the San Bernardino news outlet the Sun. “If we fail to keep pace with the growing demand for additional warehouse space, the result will be immediate and far-reaching throughout the Inland Empire — loss of good-paying jobs, less affordable housing, fewer environmental benefits and community infrastructure improvements, not to mention the gains other jurisdictions will make at our expense.” On a corner of the Bosch farms, cows lie in the shade of eucalyptus trees. The area was once largely an agricultural zone that has given way over the last decade to home tracts and warehouses. Heavy trucks have cracked the asphalt streets. “We don’t even take the street anymore,” said Bosch, pointing to a road that leads to his family’s ranch home, where his son and grandchildren now live. He said it’s too dangerous.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 424
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 9 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 425
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 10 An Amazon truck negotiates a sharp turn on Schaefer Avenue near Bosch Dairy. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
“The trucks, they don’t watch out. They think it’s a dead street.” In Ontario, there are an estimated 95,000 daily truck trips — nearly two for every household.

At one point, Bosch sought to expand his dairy farm, but the warehouse economy has become so pervasive that it priced him out.
“I asked one guy if I could rent his dairy, and he said, ‘Nah, why put up with the hassle of you renting?’” Bosch recalled, adding that owners earn more selling parking space. “The income from truck parking is lucrative.”
The logistics industry has moved into a void left as higher-wage jobs in manufacturing, defense and aerospace disappeared, converting largely agricultural and vacant land into the hub of America’s retail economy. The industry added more jobs in the Inland Empire than in any other part of the state. In 2022, it created 24,400 jobs in the area; in 2021, it created 27,400, according to John Husing, an economic consultant who specializes in logistics in the Inland Empire. Median wage ranges from $18.57 an hour for warehouse workers to $24.93 for drivers, he said.
“This is a job generator like mad,” he said. “Amazon has more than a dozen facilities out here. When the pandemic hit and people could not buy services, they converted to buying stuff, and a lot of that was done online. That really increased employment in the logistics out here, and it has held ever since.”

During the height of the pandemic, ecommerce made up 16% of U.S. retail sales, according to government data. Employment in the logistics industry was 51% higher at the end of last yearthan in February 2020, according to Southern California Assn. of Governments.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 426
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 11 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 427
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 12 Amazon and FedEx big rigs pass a neighborhood en route to warehouses in Jurupa Valley in Riverside County.
(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)
Truck drivers delivered every type of consumer good imaginable from the seaports and airports, as workers in the warehouses unloaded, sorted and reloaded them onto intermodal containers to be hauled by train and long-haul tractor-trailers across the deserts.

UPS and FedEx have Southern California regional operations in Ontario International Airport, Husing noted, which has become one of the nation’s fastest-growing cargo hubs. Amazon is the region’s largest private employer.

But other economists say many of those jobs don’t pay close to a living wage. The median hourly pay in the region is almost $5 below the California average, and turnover is high because of the grueling, nonstop work.
“Even with this impressive growth in the Inland Empire, logistics-sector jobs are generally lower-paying jobs, and they’re at very high risk of automation,” said Gigi Moreno, an economist at the Southern California Assn. of Governments. “You have automation and artificial intelligence in the logistics sector displacing workers, which means that the industry may not be able to support as many jobs as we do today. And this is even before considering any of the moratoriums on building warehousing. This is just the nature of what’s going on in the sector.”
The changes have strained communities. Many warehouses are built in low-income areas, where residents must put up with the traffic and pollution.

When the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors met to vote on a project to rezone a semirural neighborhood in Bloomington for a massive warehouse complex, dozens of residents, activists and union construction workers came to speak passionately for and against it.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 428
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 13 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 429
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 14 The board unanimously approved it, allowing the developer, Howard Industrial Partners, to build a warehouse and distribution space the size of 56 football fields. To make room, the school district agreed to relocate Zimmerman Elementary.

Environmental justice and conservation groups sued the county for neglecting to properly analyze the potential environmental damage. When operational, their lawyers argue, the complex would add thousands of diesel truck trips daily — on top of the truck traffic already choking the area. The lawsuit is pending, but families have agreed to sell their homes to make way for the new buildings.
“Development is creating an employment base and is an economic driver,” said Tim Howard, a founding partner of Howard Industrial Partners. He said warehouse projects have “transformed cities” like Fontana, providing employment opportunities and raising the quality of life.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 430
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 15 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 431
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 16 Diesel truck traffic has increased with the addition of warehouses, causing more air pollution in the Southland.
(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)
But smog in the Inland Empire — largely caused by big-rig exhaust — is the worst in the nation, according to the the American Lung Assn.

Last year, California Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (D-Grand Terrace) introduced legislation that would have required a 1,000-foot buffer zone between new warehouses and homes, schools, day-care centers, playgrounds and other areas where people gather.
“If you’re concerned about the health of the community, you’re not going to build a warehouse with diesel trucks coming in and out, spewing diesel particulate matter right next to the schools or right next to the homes,” she said.

The bill also tacked on labor requirements for new structures.

But it faced opposition from a wide array of business groups and local municipalities.

Hagman, then the chair of the San BernardinoCounty Board of Supervisors, opposed the legislation, writing to state Senate committee members that it “erodes local land use authority” and could put the county at a competitive disadvantage.

Reyes pulled the proposal after a state Senate committee sought to replace the setback provision with a one-year ban on warehouse construction, a move she felt went too far and would cause further polarization.
“I’ve never been anti-warehouse,” she said. “If in each of our cities and in each of our counties, if they did the planning of the communities in a responsible way, we wouldn’t be dealing with this, right?
“You could still have the warehouses,” she added, “but they would be planned in places where they’re not next to the homes. They’re not next to the schools. They’re not next to the day-care centers.”
Critics say that for too long, local governments have been part of the problem, rubber- stamping the projects and ignoring state environmental lawsand the progressive damage that warehouses have caused communities.

There is “a very weak and minimal analysis” of the environmental damage distribution centers have wrought, said Susan Phillips, director of the Robert Redford Conservancy F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 432
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 17 for Southern California Sustainability. Working with Radical Research, a consulting group specializing in atmospheric pollution, the conservancy released a mapping tool, “Warehouse City,” that shows the breadth of industry in the region overlaid with estimated truck trips generated and public data on pollution.

The environmental impact reports that are required by the state, she said, “are supposed to account for cumulative impacts, butthey’re rarely adequate.” The tool shows that the region has roughly 4,000 warehouses covering more than 1.5 billion square feet, including parking lots. More than 300 warehouses are 1,000 feet or less from 139 schools.
“The number of warehouses and the square footage of warehouses is mind-boggling,” she said.

Thirty years ago, there were 1,600 warehouses in the region, creating 140,000 truck trips daily, said Mike McCarthy, who runs Radical Research. The mapping found that the industry now generates more than half a million daily truck trips — nearly four times the diesel traffic as the population has almost doubled. The researchers also found that the average warehouse 30 years ago was about half the size of those built today, which average 500,000 square feet.
“They are running out of space; they are starting to go into the high desert, Imperial Valley and even the Central Valley,” Phillips said. “But they’re not stopping putting warehouses next to homes and schools in the Inland Empire. The amount of space they are using is leaving little space for anything else.”
The diesel trucks that serve warehouses spew out a cocktail of pollutants, including particulates that lodge in human lungs. Studies have linked the pollution to asthma, decreased lung function in children and cancer.
“We know diesel exhaust is a killer,” said William Barrett, national senior director of clean air advocacy for the American Lung Assn. “It’s one of the most damaging things that your lungs can experience.”
The rise in pollution and fears over climate change have pushed California air regulators to seek to ban the sale of diesel big rigs by 2040. In Southern California, regulators are attempting to limit emissions from warehouses.

Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said he has been monitoring warehouse development across California for compliance with environmental rules.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 433
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 18 “For too long, warehouses have proliferated throughout California with little consideration for the health and safety impacts on the surrounding communities,” he said in an emailed statement. “As a result of these poor land use decisions, many low- income communities and communities of color continue to be among the most pollution burdened in the state.”
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 434
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 19 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 435
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 20 An Amazon warehouse is visible from Bosch Dairy.
(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
Around the Bosch property in Ontario, much of what was once a capital of America’s dairy farms is now the nation’s capital of warehouses. There are more than 600 in the city, which has a population of 178,000. Dusty pastures disappeared as farmers fled to Texas, South Dakota and other states, and stately ranch homes became makeshift repair shops for big rigs.
“With COVID-19 and Amazon being like a superpower, you know, the warehouse craze just went crazy around here,” Bosch said. “I guess it’s progress, you know. I don’t like it so much.”
The market is so hot for warehouses that they are leased before they are even built, said Eloy Covarrubias, an investment broker at CBRE, specializing in industrial property. He estimates that there are between 38 million and 39 million square feet under construction — and more than half is already leased. “There has been a significant amount of pent-up demand for that space,” he said, noting that the vacancy rate is about 1%.

That has cost the Inland Empire its agricultural roots, said Amparo Muñoz, former policy director at the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, a Jurupa Valley group that has been fighting warehouse development and signed the letter to Newsom.

Muñoz didn’t start off as an environmentalist. A trained engineer, she spent some of her time in warehouses checking and maintaining equipment.
“I really believed that if you let businesses regulate themselves, they do the right thing,” she said.

Her ideas changed after she had her second child. She had moved to Fontana a few years before, to a tract of homes surrounded by fields. She loved the pastoral life, the agricultural clubs and bunny farms. But by the time she was pregnant in 2013, an Amazon warehouse had been built less than two blocks from her home. “At first you are like, hey, it’s not too bad,” she said.

She walked daily along the perimeter of her neighborhood to stay fit while pregnant, but what she thought were allergies worsened until she couldn’t breathe.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 436
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 21 “The doctor asked me how long I had had asthma, and I was like ‘What? I don’t have asthma.’”
She learned that she had developed the condition in her 30s. Her son was born with asthma and had to have a breathing mechanism for the first year of his life. “They told me it was environmental factors,” she said. “I didn’t think about all the trucks that were idling at the warehouse when I was walking by them.” The family spent around $22,000 to install high-grade air filters and a new duct system in their home.
“A lot of time, kids wake up with bloody noses on their pillows,” she said. “We have the worst air quality. We have gridlock. We have streets and communities that were never built for global logistics. We’re basically building, on top of failed infrastructure, a global network.”

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 437
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

6(179,$(0$,/
)HEUXDU\
MXOLDG#PRYDORUJ
-XOLD'HVFRWHDX[6HQLRU3ODQQHU
&LW\RI0RUHQR9DOOH\
)UHGHULFN6WUHHW
0RUHQR9DOOH\&DOLIRUQLD

Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed
Cottonwood & Edgemont Project (Proposed Project)
Master Plot Plan PEN21-0325, Plot Plan PEN21-0326

6RXWK &RDVW $LU 4XDOLW\ 0DQDJHPHQW 'LVWULFW
6RXWK &RDVW $40'
VWDII DSSUHFLDWHV WKH
RSSRUWXQLW\WRFRPPHQWRQWKHDERYHPHQWLRQHGGRFXPHQW7KH&LW \RI0RUHQR9DOOH\LVWKH &DOLIRUQLD(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\$FW
&(4$
/HDG$JHQF\IRUWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW7KH
IROORZLQJFRPPHQWVUHFRPPHQGHGUHYLVLRQVWRWKH(0)$&YHUVLRQ KHDOWKULVNDVVHVVPHQW DQDO\VLVLQFRQVLVWHQWLQIRUPDWLRQGXULQJJUDGLQJDFWLYLWLHVDQGFRQFHSWGHVLJQ RULHQWDWLRQWKDW WKH/HDG$JHQF\VKRXOGLQFOXGHLQWKH)LQDO01'

6RXWK&RDVW$40'6WDII¶V6XPPDU\RI3URMHFW,QIRUPDWLRQLQWKH01' %DVHGRQWKH01'WKH3URSRVHG3URM HFWFRQVLVWVRIGHYHORSLQJWZR VTXDUHIHHWRIOLJKW
LQGXVWULDOEXLOGLQJVZLWKDWRWDOFRPELQHGIORRUDUHDRI

VTXDUHIHHWRQDQDSSUR[LPDWHO\

JURVVDFUHSURSHUW\7KH3URSRVHG3URMHFWORFDWHVRQWKHHDVWVLGHRI2OG)URQWDJH5RDG DSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWVRXWKRI&RWWRQZRRG$YHQXHDQGDSSUR[LPD WHO\IHHWQRUWKRI%D\ $YHQXH&LW\RI0RUHQR9DOOH\7KH3URSRVHG3URMHFWZRXOGLQFOXGHQLQH

GRFNGRRUVRQWKH
HDVWVLGHRIHDFKEXLOGLQJDVVRFLDWHGZLWKRQHZD\WUXFNWULSVSHUGD\7KH3URSRVHG3URMHFW ZRXOG KDYH WKUHH GULYHZD\V DORQJ 2OG )URQWDJH 5RDG ZLWK WKH QRUWKHUQPRVW DQG VRXWKHUQPRVWGULYHZD\VIRUSDVVHQJHUYHKLFOHVDQGKHDY\WUXFNVWRDFFHVVWKHVLWH%DVHGRQWKH DULHOSKRWRJUDSKV6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIILQGVWKDWWKHQHDUHV WVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV HJ

UHVLGHQFHV
DUHOHVVWKDQIHHWQRUWKQRUWKHDVWDQGZLWKLQ IHHWHDVWRIWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW 7KH3URSRVHG3URMHFW¶VFRQVWUXFWLRQLVDQWLFLSDWHGWRRFFXURYH UHLJKWPRQWKVDVVXPHGWR FRPPHQFHLQ)HEUXDU\DQGILQLVKLQ2FWREHU

01'3DJH
Ibid
Ibid3DJH
Ibid$SSHQGL[.7UDIILF$QDO\VLV3DJH
Ibid3DJH
Ibid3DJH
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 438
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) -XOLD'HVFRWHDX[ )HEUXDU\

6RXWK&RDVW$40'6WDII¶V&RPPHQWVRQWKH01'

EMFAC Version
$FFRUGLQJWR$SSHQGL[$±$LU4XDOLW\,PSDFW$QDO\VLVWKH3URS RVHGSURMHFW¶VRSHUDWLRQDO HPLVVLRQVDUHDQDO\]HGXWLOL]LQJ(0)$&HPLVVLRQVIDFWRUVWR GHULYHYHKLFOHHPLVVLRQV $FFRUGLQJWRWKH&$5%WKH(0)$& ZDVRIILFLDOO\UHOHDVHGLQ-DQXDU\6LQFHWKH 3URSRVHG3URMHFW01'ZDVSUHSDUHGLQ)HEUXDU\6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIUHFRPPHQGV WKDWWKH/HDG$JHQF\UHYLVHWKHHPLVVLRQVFDOFXODWLRQVXWLOL]LQ JWKH(0)$&HPLVVLRQV IDFWRUVDQGLQFOXGHLQWKH)LQDO01',IWKHUHYLVLRQLVQRWLQFOXGHGLQWKH)LQDO01'WKH/HDG $JHQF\VKRXOGSURYLGHUHDVRQVIRUQRWKDYLQJWKHPVXSSRUWHGE\ VXEVWDQWLDOHYLGHQFHLQWKH UHFRUG

2QWKHRWKHUKDQGWKH/HDG$JHQF\FRXOGJRDVWHSIXUWKHUVLQFH&$5%KDVXSGDWHGWKH(0)$& YLQ$SULO

DQGWKH/HDG$JHQF\FDQFRQVLGHUXVLQJLWIRUWKHUHYLVLRQRIDQDO\VLV LQWKH)LQDO01',IWKH/HDG$JHQF\GHFLGHVWRXVHWKHPRVWFXUUHQWXSGDWHGYHUVLRQVRI(0)$& Y6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIHQFRXUDJHWKH/HDG$JHQF\WRYLVLW&$5%¶VZHEVLWHIRU PRUHLQIRUPDWLRQ

Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Analysis

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
%XLOGLQJ'RZQZDVK2SWLRQLQ2SHUDWLRQDO+5$0RGHOLQJ
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
Ibid$SSHQGL[$±$LU4XDOLW\,PSDFW$QDO\VLV3DJH &$5%(0)$&$FFHVVDW
KWWSV
DUEFDJRYHPIDF

&$5%(0)$&Y$FFHVVDW
KWWSV
DUEFDJRYHPIDF
Ibid$SSHQGL[$±0RELOH6RXUFH+HDOWK5LVN$VVHVVPHQW3DJHVDQGRI3') 6RXWK&RDVW$40'5LVN$VVHVVPHQW3URFHGXUHVY$FFHVVDW KWWS
ZZZDTPGJRYGRFVGHIDXOWVRXUFHSHUPLWWLQJUXOH
ULVNDVVHVVPHQWULVNDVVHVVSURFYSGI
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 439
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) -XOLD'HVFRWHDX[ )HEUXDU\

FRPEXVWLRQHQJLQHV
HJGLHVHOILUHZDWHUSXPSGLHVHOHPHUJHQ F\JHQHUDWRUHWF ZLOOEHXVHG
RQVLWHGXULQJRSHUDWLRQ,IDQ\RIWKHVHZLOOEHXVHGZKHQLPS OHPHQWLQJWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW WKH\ZLOOQHHGWREHDGGHGDVDGGLWLRQDOVRXUFHVWRWKH+5$DQG GLVSHUVLRQPRGHOLQJILOHV 7KHUHIRUH6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIUHFRPPHQGWKDWWKH/HDG$JHQF\UHYLVHWKHRSHUDWLRQDO+5$ PRGHOLQJE\LQFRUSRUDWLQJWKHDERYHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVDQGLQFOXGLQJWKH+5$UHVXOWVLQWKH)LQDO 01',IWKH+5$PRGHOLQJLVQRWUHYLVHGDQGLQFOXGHGLQWKH)LQDO01'WKH/HDG$JHQF\VKRXOG SURYLGHUHDVRQVVXSSRUWHGE\VXEVWDQWLDOHYLGHQFHLQWKHUHFRUGWRH[SODLQZK\WKHUHYLVLRQLVQRW LQFOXGHG
Inconsistent Information During Grading Activities

8QGHUWKH&RQVWUXFWLRQ&KDUDFWHULVWLFVHFWLRQRIWKH01'WKHH DUWKZRUNDFWLYLWLHVDUHH[SHFWHG WREHEDODQFHGDQGQRLPSRUWRUH[SRUWRIVRLOPDWHULDOVZRXOGEHUHTXLUHG+RZHYHU$SSHQGL[ $±$LU4XDOLW\,PSDFW$QDO\VLVGLVFORVHVWKDWWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFWLVDQWLFLSDWHGWRUHTXLUH FXELF\DUGVRIH[SRUW GXULQJJUDGLQJDFWLYLWLHV)XUWKHUPRUH&DOLIRUQLD(PLVVLRQV( VWLPDWRU 0RGHO
&DO((0RG
RXWSXWILOHVVKRZKDXOLQJWUXFNWULSVDVVRFLDW HGZLWKWKHJUDGLQJDFWLYLWLHV FRQILUPLQJWKHPDWHULDOLQIRUPDWLRQH[SRUWGLVFXVVHGLQ$SSHQGL [$'XHWRWKHLQFRQVLVWHQF\ 6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIUHFRPPHQGVWKDWWKH/HDG$JHQF\UHYLVHWKHH[SRUWLPSRUWLQIRUPDWLRQ DQGLQFOXGHWKHUHYLVLRQLQWKH)LQDO01'WRDYRLGGLVFUHSDQFLHVWKURXJKRXWWKH)LQDO01'DQG LWVDSSHQGLFHV,IWKHUHYLVLRQLVQRWLQFOXGHGLQWKH)LQDO01'WKH/HDG$JHQF\VKRXOGSURYLGH UHDVRQVIRUQRWKDYLQJWKHPVXSSRUWHGE\VXEVWDQWLDOHYLGHQFHLQWKHUHFRUG
Concept Design and Orientation

%DVHGRQWKH01'WKH3URSRVHG3URMHFWZRXOGKDYHQLQH

GRFNGRRUVORFDWHGRQWKHHDVWVLGH
RIHDFKEXLOGLQJ
%DVHGRQWKHDHULDOSKRWRJUDSKDQG)LJXUH$EHORZ6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDII LVFRQFHUQHGDERXWWKHORDGLQJGRFNRULHQWDWLRQRIWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW7KHVHORDGLQJGRFNVIDFH (GJHPRQW6WUHHWZKHUHVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV
HJUHVLGHQFHV
DUHORFDWHGDVQRWHGLQ)LJXUH$

Ibid3DJH
Ibid$SSHQGL[$±$LU4XDOLW\,PSDFW$QDO\VLV3DJH
Ibid3DJH
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 440
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) -XOLD'HVFRWHDX[ )HEUXDU\

Figure A
Loading Docks and Truck Movements15

$VDUHVXOW6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIIUHFRPPHQGVWKDWWKH/HDG$JHQF\UHFRQVLGHUWKH3URSRVHG 3URMHFW EXLOGLQJV¶ GHVLJQRULHQWDWLRQ VXFK DV SODFLQJ ORDGLQJGRFNV IXUWKHUDZD\ IURP WKH VHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVWRKHOSUHGXFHWKHLPSDFWVRIWKHRSHUDWLRQDODFWLYLWLHVRQWKHVHQVLWLYH UHFHSWRUV,QWKHHYHQWWKDWWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW¶VGHVLJQLVUHYLVHGWKH/HDG$JHQF\VKRXOG LQFOXGHWKHQHZGHVLJQDQGLWVDVVRFLDWHGDQDO\VLV
HJHPLVVLRQVFDOFXODWLRQV+5$
LQWKH)LQDO
01'

Ibid$SSHQGL[$±0RELOH6RXUFH+HDOWK5LVN$VVHVVPHQW3DJH Residences
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 441
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) -XOLD'HVFRWHDX[ )HEUXDU\

&RQFOXVLRQ
3XUVXDQWWR&(4$*XLGHOLQHV6HFWLRQSULRUWRDSSURYLQJW KH3URSRVHG3URMHFWWKH/HDG $JHQF\VKDOOFRQVLGHUWKH01'IRUDGRSWLRQWRJHWKHUZLWKDQ\FR PPHQWVUHFHLYHGGXULQJWKH SXEOLFUHYLHZSURFHVV3OHDVHSURYLGH6RXWK&RDVW$40'ZLWKZULWWHQUHVSRQVHVWRDOOFRPPHQWV FRQWDLQHGKHUHLQSULRUWRWKHDGRSWLRQRIWKH)LQDO01':KHQUHVSRQGLQJWRLVVXHVUDLVHGLQWKH FRPPHQWVUHVSRQVHVVKRXOGSURYLGHVXIILFLHQWGHWDLOVJLYLQJUHDVRQVZK\VSHFLILFFRPPHQWVDQG VXJJHVWLRQV DUH QRW DFFHSWHG 7KHUH VKRXOG EH JRRG IDLWK UHDVRQHG DQDO\VLV LQ UHVSRQVH &RQFOXVRU\VWDWHPHQWVXQVXSSRUWHGE\IDFWXDOLQIRUPDWLRQGRQRWIDFLOLWDWHWKHSXUSRVHDQGJRDO RI&(4$RQSXEOLFGLVFORVXUHDQGDUHQRWPHDQLQJIXOLQIRUPDWLYHRUXVHIXOWRGHFLVLRQPDNHUV DQGWKHSXEOLFZKRDUHLQWHUHVWHGLQWKH3URSRVHG3URMHFW
6RXWK&RDVW$40'VWDIILVDYDLODEOHWRZRUNZLWKWKH/HDG$JHQF \WRDGGUHVVDQ\DLUTXDOLW\ TXHVWLRQVWKDWPD\DULVHIURPWKLVFRPPHQWOHWWHU3OHDVHFRQWD FW'DQLFD1JX\HQ$LU4XDOLW\ 6SHFLDOLVWDWGQJX\HQ#DTPGJRYVKRXOG\RXKDYHDQ\TXHVWLRQV
6LQFHUHO\
Sam Wang
6DP:DQJ
3URJUDP6XSHUYLVRU&(4$,*5
3ODQQLQJ5XOH'HYHORSPHQW ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ

6:
'1
59&
&RQWURO1XPEHU

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 442
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 443
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 444
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 445
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 446
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: CMT Torres
To: Julia Descoteaux; City Clerk
Subject: Cottonwood and Edgemont Project
Date: Saturday, February 25, 2023 8:20:29 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
7RWKHSODQQLQJFRPPLVVLRQUHJDUGLQJWKH&RWWRQZRRGDQG(GJHPRQWSURMHFW 7ZREULHIFRPPHQWV

1RPRUHZDUHKRXVHV
3OHDVHWDNHDFXHIURPPDQ\RWKHU6R&DOFLWLHVDQGLVVXHDPRUDWRULXP 7KDQN\RX
&KULVWLQD7RUUHV
%ULGJHU6W
0RUHQR9DOOH\&$
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 447
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Catherine Lin
Subject: Fwd: Vote NO on warehiouse at Edgemont & Cottonwood Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 10:11:55 AM
6HHDWWDFKHG
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Marcia Narog <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 8:47:48 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Vote NO on warehiouse at Edgemont & Cottonwood
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
7RDOO&LW\3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQHUVDQG&LW\&RXQFLO

,DPRSSRVHGWR$1<PRUHZDUHKRXVHVLQ0RUHQR9DOOH\EHFDXVHRIWKHDLUDQGQRLVH SROOXWLRQWUDIILFDQGURDGSUREOHPVDQGWKHGHVWUXFWLRQRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRGDPELDQFHWKDW WKH\EULQJ
,I\RXZRXOGQ
WZDQWDZDUHKRXVHLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WR\RXUKRPHWKHQ\RXVKRXOGYRWH DJDLQVWDQ\WKDWFRPSURPLVHWKHOLYHVRIRWKHU0RUHQR9DOOH\FLWL]HQV 3OHDVHLQVWLWXWHDPRUDWRULXPRQ0RUHQR9DOOH\ZDUHKRXVHGHYHORSPHQWHVSHFLDOO\LQFORVH SUR[LPLW\WRIDPLO\KRPHV
6LQFHUHO\
0DUFLD1DURJ
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 448
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 1 Sean P. Kelleher
From: George Hague <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2023 8:36 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Comments on the Cottonwood & Edgemont (C&E) warehouse Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) & AG & CARB -- 3
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Warning:ExternalEmail–WatchforEmailRedFlags!
GoodmorningMsDescoteaux,February26,2023

RE:CommentsontheCottonwood&Edgemont(C&E)warehouseInitialStudy/MitigatedNegativeDeclaration(IS/MND) ThestateAttorneyGeneral(AG)hasprovidethewarehouseguidelinesfoundbelowfor"WarehouseProject:Best PracticesandMitigationMeasurestoComplywiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct”beginningwithsectionIV onpage4.Th
eCottonwood&Edgemont(C&E)warehouseprojecthassignificantlyfailedtothisdatetoincorporate mostoftheseBestPracticesandMitigationmeasureinallenvironmentaldocuments/staffreportandthereforetheywill beinadequateunlesstheyareincludedinthefinalproject.Thereneedstobefu ll analysisofallofthisBestPractices andMitigationsandhowtheywillmaketheprojectmuchbetterforpeopleandtheenvironment— especiallyinour nonͲattainmentareaandinthiscensustractwheretheresidentsareintheworst1%ofallofCaliforniaforpoll ution andothersocioͲeconomicimpactaccordingtoCalEnviroScreen.ThiswouldbebestrealizedwithafullEiRandnot relyingonthemuchcheaperaswellaslessthorough,lessanalyzations,lessremediesprovided,andlessresponsiveto thepublicMND.

TheAttorneyGeneral(AG)officehasmadetheseBestPracticesandMitigationMeasuresforwarehousesavailablewell beforeth
eapplicationandbeforetheMNDbytheC&Edevelopertobuildawarehouseinthislocation.MostMoreno Valleyplannershavealsoreceivedthemeitherfrommeand/orothersourcespriortoprocessingtheC&E.Thereisno excusefornotmakingth empartofthisprojectfromdayone.Infactifthedeveloper/cityimplementedthefirst paragraphfoundbelowtheC&Ewarehousewouldnotevenbeenproposedonthissitewhichitisonly18ftto28ft fromseveralfamilyhomes— sensitivereceptors.

AG’sWareho useProject:BestPracticesandMitigationMeasuresbeginningwithsectionIVonpage4followsbelow:
IV. Warehouse Siting and Design Considerations
7KHPRVWLPSRUWDQWFRQVLGHUDWLRQZKHQSODQQLQJDORJLVWLFVIDFLOLW\LVLWVORFDWLRQ:DUHKRXVHVORFDWHGLQ UHVLGHQWLDOQHLJKERUKRRGVRUQHDURWKHUVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVH[SRVHFRPPXQLW\UHVLGHQWVDQGWKRVHXVLQJRU YLVLWLQJVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVLWHVWRWKHDLUSROOXWLRQQRLVHWUDIILFDQGRWKHUHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVWKH\ JHQHUDWH7KHUHIRUHSODFLQJIDFLOLWLHVDZD\IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVVLJQLILFDQWO\UHGXFHVWKHLUHQYLURQPHQWDO DQGTXDOLW\RIOLIHKDUPVRQORFDO
3DJH
FRPPXQLWLHV7KHVXJJHVWHGEHVWSUDFWLFHVIRUVLWLQJDQGGHVLJQRIZDUHKRXVHIDFLOLWLHVGRHVQRWUHOLHYHOHDG DJHQFLHV¶UHVSRQVLELOLW\XQGHU&(4$WRFRQGXFWDSURMHFWVSHFLILFDQDO\VLVRIWKHSURMHFW¶VLPSDFWVDQG F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 449
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 2 HYDOXDWLRQRIIHDVLEOHPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVDQGDOWHUQDWLYHV OHDGDJHQFLHV¶LQFRUSRUDWLRQRIWKHEHVWSUDFWLFHV
PXVWEHSDUWRIWKHLPSDFWPLWLJDWLRQDQGDOWHUQDWLYHVDQDO\VHVWRPHHWWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI&(4$([DPSOHV RIEHVWSUDFWLFHVZKHQVLWLQJDQGGHVLJQLQJZDUHKRXVHIDFLOLWLHVLQFOXGH
x x3HU&$5%JXLGDQFHVLWLQJZDUHKRXVHIDFLOLWLHVVRWKDWWKHLUSURSHUW\OLQHVDUHDWOHDVWIHHWIURP WKHSURSHUW\OLQHVRIWKHQHDUHVWVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV x x&UHDWLQJSK\VLFDOVWUXFWXUDODQGRUYHJHWDWLYHEXIIHUVWKDWDGHTXDWHO\SUHYHQWRUVXEVWDQWLDOO\UHGXFH SROOXWDQWGLVSHUVDOEHWZHHQZDUHKRXVHVDQGDQ\DUHDVZKHUHVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVDUHOLNHO\WREHSUHVHQW VXFKDVKRPHVVFKRROVGD\FDUHFHQWHUVKRVSLWDOVFRPPXQLW\FHQWHUVDQGSDUNV x x3URYLGLQJDGHTXDWHDUHDVIRURQVLWHSDUNLQJRQVLWHTXHXLQJDQGWUXFNFKHFNLQWKDWSUHYHQWWUXFNV DQGRWKHUYHKLFOHVIURPSDUNLQJRULGOLQJRQSXEOLFVWUHHWV x x3ODFLQJIDFLOLW\HQWU\DQGH[LWSRLQWVIURPWKHSXEOLFVWUHHWDZD\IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVHJSODFLQJ WKHVHSRLQWVRQWKHQRUWKVLGHRIWKHIDFLOLW\LIVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVDUHDGMDFHQWWRWKHVRXWKVLGHRIWKH IDFLOLW\

x x/RFDWLQJZDUHKRXVHGRFNGRRUVDQGRWKHURQVLWHDUHDVZLWKVLJQLILFDQWWUXFNWUDIILFDQGQRLVHDZD\ IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVHJSODFLQJWKHVHGRFNGRRUVRQWKHQRUWKVLGHRIWKHIDFLOLW\LIVHQVLWLYH UHFHSWRUVDUHDGMDFHQWWRWKHVRXWKVLGHRIWKHIDFLOLW\ x x6FUHHQLQJGRFNGRRUVDQGRQVLWHDUHDVZLWKVLJQLILFDQWWUXFNWUDIILFZLWKSK\VLFDOVWUXFWXUDODQGRU YHJHWDWLYHEDUULHUVWKDWDGHTXDWHO\SUHYHQWRUVXEVWDQWLDOO\UHGXFHSROOXWDQWGLVSHUVDOIURPWKHIDFLOLW\ WRZDUGVVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV
x x3RVWLQJVLJQVFOHDUO\VKRZLQJWKHGHVLJQDWHGHQWU\DQGH[LWSRLQWVIURPWKHSXEOLFVWUHHWIRUWUXFNVDQG VHUYLFHYHKLFOHV
x x3RVWLQJVLJQVLQGLFDWLQJWKDWDOOSDUNLQJDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWUXFNVPXVWEHFRQGXFWHGZLWKLQ GHVLJQDWHGRQVLWHDUHDVDQGQRWZLWKLQWKHVXUURXQGLQJFRPPXQLW\RUSXEOLFVWUHHWV V. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis and Mitigation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
&$5%
$LU4XDOLW\DQG/DQG8VH+DQGERRN
$&RPPXQLW\+HDOWK
3HUVSHFWLYH
$SULO
DW(6&$5%VWDIIKDVUHOHDVHGGUDIWXSGDWHVWRWKLVVLWLQJDQGGHVLJQJXLGDQFH ZKLFKVXJJHVWVDJUHDWHUGLVWDQFHPD\EHZDUUDQWHGXQGHUYDU\LQJVFHQDULRV WKLVGRFXPHQWPD\EHIRXQGRQ
&$5%¶VZHEVLWHDQGLVHQWLWOHG
³&DOLIRUQLD6XVWDLQDEOH)UHLJKW,QLWLDWLYH
&RQFHSW3DSHUIRUWKH)UHLJKW
+DQGERRN´
'HFHPEHU

3DJH
VKRXOGDOVRFRQVLGHUGHVLJQLQJSURMHFWVZLWKWKHLUORQJWHUPYLDELOLW\LQPLQG&RQVWUXFWLQJWKHQHFHVVDU\ LQIUDVWUXFWXUHWRSUHSDUHIRUWKH]HURHPLVVLRQIXWXUHRIJRRGVPRYHPHQWQRWRQO\UHGXFHVDIDFLOLW\¶VHPLVVLRQV DQGORFDOLPSDFWQRZEXWLWFDQDOVRVDYHPRQH\DVUHJXODWLRQVWLJKWHQDQGGHPDQGIRU]HURHPLVVLRQ LQIUDVWUXFWXUHJURZV,QSODQQLQJQHZORJLVWLFVIDFLOLWLHVWKH%XUHDXVWURQJO\HQFRXUDJHVGHYHORSHUVWRFRQVLGHU WKHORFDOVWDWHZLGHDQGJOREDOLPSDFWVRIWKHLUSURMHFWV¶HPLVVLRQV
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 3 ([DPSOHVRIEHVWSUDFWLFHVZKHQVWXG\LQJDLUTXDOLW\DQGJUHHQKRXVHJDVLPSDFWVLQFOXGH
x x)XOO\DQDO\]LQJDOOUHDVRQDEO\IRUHVHHDEOHSURMHFWLPSDFWVLQFOXGLQJFXPXODWLYHLPSDFWV,QJHQHUDO QHZZDUHKRXVHGHYHORSPHQWVDUHQRWPLQLVWHULDOXQGHU&(4$EHFDXVHWKH\LQYROYHSXEOLFRIILFLDOV¶ SHUVRQDOMXGJPHQWDVWRWKHZLVGRPRUPDQQHURIFDUU\LQJRXWWKHSURMHFWHYHQZKHQZDUHKRXVHVDUH SHUPLWWHGE\DVLWH¶VDSSOLFDEOH]RQLQJDQGRUJHQHUDOSODQODQGXVHGHVLJQDWLRQ&(4$*XLGHOLQHV

x x:KHQDQDO\]LQJFXPXODWLYHLPSDFWVWKRURXJKO\FRQVLGHULQJWKHSURMHFW¶VLQFUHPHQWDOLPSDFWLQ FRPELQDWLRQZLWKSDVWSUHVHQWDQGUHDVRQDEO\IRUHVHHDEOHIXWXUHSURMHFWVHYHQLIWKHSURMHFW¶V LQGLYLGXDOLPSDFWVDORQHGRQRWH[FHHGWKHDSSOLFDEOHVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROGV x x3UHSDULQJDTXDQWLWDWLYHDLUTXDOLW\VWXG\LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKORFDODLUGLVWULFWJXLGHOLQHV x x3UHSDULQJDTXDQWLWDWLYHKHDOWKULVNDVVHVVPHQWLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&DOLIRUQLD2IILFHRI(QYLURQPHQWDO +HDOWK+D]DUG$VVHVVPHQWDQGORFDODLUGLVWULFWJXLGHOLQHV x x5HIUDLQLQJIURPODEHOLQJFRPSOLDQFHZLWK&$5%RUDLUGLVWULFWUHJXODWLRQVDVDPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUH² FRPSOLDQFHZLWKDSSOLFDEOHUHJXODWLRQVLVDEDVHOLQHH[SHFWDWLRQ x x)XOO\DQDO\]LQJLPSDFWVIURPWUXFNWULSV&(4$UHTXLUHVIXOOSXEOLFGLVFORVXUHRIDSURMHFW¶V DQWLFLSDWHGWUXFNWULSVZKLFKHQWDLOVFDOFXODWLQJWUXFNWULSOHQJWKEDVHGRQOLNHO\WUXFNWULSGHVWLQDWLRQV UDWKHUWKDQWKHGLVWDQFHIURPWKHIDFLOLW\WRWKHHGJHRIWKHDLUEDVLQ(PLVVLRQVEH\RQGWKHDLUEDVLQDUH QRWVSHFXODWLYHDQGEHFDXVHDLUSROOXWLRQLVQRWVWDWLFPD\FRQWULEXWHWRDLUEDVLQSROOXWLRQ0RUHRYHU DQ\FRQWULEXWLRQVWRDLUSROOXWLRQRXWVLGHWKHORFDODLUEDVLQVKRXOGEHTXDQWLILHGDQGWKHLUVLJQLILFDQFH VKRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHG
x x$FFRXQWLQJIRUDOOUHDVRQDEO\IRUHVHHDEOHJUHHQKRXVHJDVHPLVVLRQVIURPWKHSURMHFWZLWKRXW GLVFRXQWLQJSURMHFWHGHPLVVLRQVEDVHGRQSDUWLFLSDWLRQLQ&DOLIRUQLD¶V&DSDQG7UDGH3URJUDP
([DPSOHVRIPHDVXUHVWRPLWLJDWHDLUTXDOLW\DQGJUHHQKRXVHJDVLPSDFWVIURPFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHEHORZ 7RHQVXUHPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVDUHHQIRUFHDEOHDQGHIIHFWLYHWKH\VKRXOGEHLPSRVHGDVSHUPLW FRQGLWLRQVRQWKHSURMHFWZKHUHDSSOLFDEOH
x5HTXLULQJRIIURDGFRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWWREH]HURHPLVVLRQZKHUHDYDLODEOHDQGDOOGLHVHOIXHOHGRIIURDG FRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWWREHHTXLSSHGZLWK&$5%7LHU,9FRPSOLDQWHQJLQHVRUEHWWHUDQGLQFOXGLQJWKLV UHTXLUHPHQWLQDSSOLFDEOH

3DJH
ELGGRFXPHQWVSXUFKDVHRUGHUVDQGFRQWUDFWVZLWKVXFFHVVIXOFRQWUDFWRUVGHPRQVWUDWLQJWKHDELOLW\WRVXSSO\ WKHFRPSOLDQWFRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWIRUXVHSULRUWRDQ\JURXQGGLVWXUELQJDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQDFWLYLWLHV x x3URKLELWLQJRIIURDGGLHVHOSRZHUHGHTXLSPHQWIURPEHLQJLQWKH³RQ´SRVLWLRQIRUPRUHWKDQKRXUV SHUGD\
x x5HTXLULQJRQURDGKHDY\GXW\KDXOWUXFNVWREHPRGHO\HDURUQHZHULIGLHVHOIXHOHG x x3URYLGLQJHOHFWULFDOKRRNXSVWRWKHSRZHUJULGUDWKHUWKDQXVHRIGLHVHOIXHOHGJHQHUDWRUVIRUHOHFWULF FRQVWUXFWLRQWRROVVXFKDVVDZVGULOOVDQGFRPSUHVVRUVDQGXVLQJHOHFWULFWRROVZKHQHYHUIHDVLEOH x x/LPLWLQJWKHDPRXQWRIGDLO\JUDGLQJGLVWXUEDQFHDUHD x x3URKLELWLQJJUDGLQJRQGD\VZLWKDQ$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[IRUHFDVWRIJUHDWHUWKDQ IRUSDUWLFXODWHVRUR]RQHIRUWKHSURMHFWDUHD
x x)RUELGGLQJLGOLQJRIKHDY\HTXLSPHQWIRUPRUHWKDQWZRPLQXWHV x x.HHSLQJRQVLWHDQGIXUQLVKLQJWRWKHOHDGDJHQF\RURWKHUUHJXODWRUVXSRQUHTXHVW F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 4 DOOHTXLSPHQWPDLQWHQDQFHUHFRUGVDQGGDWDVKHHWVLQFOXGLQJGHVLJQ VSHFLILFDWLRQVDQGHPLVVLRQFRQWUROWLHUFODVVLILFDWLRQV x x&RQGXFWLQJDQRQVLWHLQVSHFWLRQWRYHULI\FRPSOLDQFHZLWKFRQVWUXFWLRQ PLWLJDWLRQDQGWRLGHQWLI\RWKHURSSRUWXQLWLHVWRIXUWKHUUHGXFHFRQVWUXFWLRQ LPSDFWV
x x8VLQJSDLQWVDUFKLWHFWXUDOFRDWLQJVDQGLQGXVWULDOPDLQWHQDQFHFRDWLQJVWKDWKDYH YRODWLOHRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGOHYHOVRIOHVVWKDQJ/
x x3URYLGLQJLQIRUPDWLRQRQWUDQVLWDQGULGHVKDULQJSURJUDPVDQGVHUYLFHVWR FRQVWUXFWLRQHPSOR\HHV
x x3URYLGLQJPHDORSWLRQVRQVLWHRUVKXWWOHVEHWZHHQWKHIDFLOLW\DQGQHDUE\PHDO GHVWLQDWLRQVIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQHPSOR\HHV
([DPSOHVRIPHDVXUHVWRPLWLJDWHDLUTXDOLW\DQGJUHHQKRXVHJDVLPSDFWVIURPRSHUDWLRQLQFOXGH
x x5HTXLULQJWKDWDOOIDFLOLW\RZQHGDQGRSHUDWHGIOHHWHTXLSPHQWZLWKDJURVVYHKLFOHZHLJKWUDWLQJ JUHDWHUWKDQSRXQGVDFFHVVLQJWKHVLWHPHHWRUH[FHHGPRGHO\HDUHPLVVLRQVHTXLYDOHQW HQJLQHVWDQGDUGVDVFXUUHQWO\GHILQHGLQ&DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV7LWOH'LYLVLRQ&KDSWHU $UWLFOH6HFWLRQ)DFLOLW\RSHUDWRUVVKDOOPDLQWDLQUHFRUGVRQVLWHGHPRQVWUDWLQJFRPSOLDQFH ZLWKWKLVUHTXLUHPHQWDQGVKDOOPDNHUHFRUGVDYDLODEOHIRULQVSHFWLRQE\WKHORFDOMXULVGLFWLRQDLU GLVWULFWDQGVWDWHXSRQUHTXHVW

x x5HTXLULQJDOOKHDY\GXW\YHKLFOHVHQWHULQJRURSHUDWHGRQWKHSURMHFWVLWHWREH]HURHPLVVLRQ EHJLQQLQJLQ
x x5HTXLULQJRQVLWHHTXLSPHQWVXFKDVIRUNOLIWVDQG\DUGWUXFNVWREHHOHFWULFZLWKWKHQHFHVVDU\ HOHFWULFDOFKDUJLQJVWDWLRQVSURYLGHG
x x5HTXLULQJWHQDQWVWRXVH]HURHPLVVLRQOLJKWDQGPHGLXPGXW\YHKLFOHVDVSDUWRIEXVLQHVV RSHUDWLRQV
x x)RUELGGLQJWUXFNVIURPLGOLQJIRUPRUHWKDQWZRPLQXWHVDQGUHTXLULQJRSHUDWRUVWRWXUQRIIHQJLQHV ZKHQQRWLQXVH
x x3RVWLQJERWKLQWHULRUDQGH[WHULRUIDFLQJVLJQVLQFOXGLQJVLJQVGLUHFWHGDWDOO 3DJH
GRFNDQGGHOLYHU\DUHDVLGHQWLI\LQJLGOLQJUHVWULFWLRQVDQGFRQWDFWLQIRUPDWLRQWR UHSRUWYLRODWLRQVWR&$5%WKHDLUGLVWULFWDQGWKHEXLOGLQJPDQDJHU x x,QVWDOOLQJDQGPDLQWDLQLQJDWWKHPDQXIDFWXUHU¶VUHFRPPHQGHGPDLQWHQDQFH LQWHUYDOVDLUILOWUDWLRQV\VWHPVDWVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVZLWKLQDFHUWDLQUDGLXVRI F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 5 IDFLOLW\IRUWKHOLIHRIWKHSURMHFW
x x,QVWDOOLQJDQGPDLQWDLQLQJDWWKHPDQXIDFWXUHU¶VUHFRPPHQGHGPDLQWHQDQFH LQWHUYDOVDQDLUPRQLWRULQJVWDWLRQSUR[LPDWHWRVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVDQGWKHIDFLOLW\IRUWKHOLIHRIWKH SURMHFWDQGPDNLQJWKHUHVXOWLQJGDWDSXEOLFO\DYDLODEOHLQUHDOWLPH:KLOHDLUPRQLWRULQJGRHVQRW PLWLJDWHWKHDLUTXDOLW\RUJUHHQKRXVHJDVLPSDFWVRIDIDFLOLW\LWQRQHWKHOHVVEHQHILWVWKHDIIHFWHG FRPPXQLW\E\SURYLGLQJLQIRUPDWLRQWKDWFDQEHXVHGWRLPSURYHDLUTXDOLW\RUDYRLGH[SRVXUHWR XQKHDOWK\DLU
x x&RQVWUXFWLQJHOHFWULFWUXFNFKDUJLQJVWDWLRQVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHQXPEHURIGRFNGRRUVDWWKHSURMHFW x x&RQVWUXFWLQJHOHFWULFSOXJVIRUHOHFWULFWUDQVSRUWUHIULJHUDWLRQXQLWVDWHYHU\GRFNGRRULIWKH ZDUHKRXVHXVHFRXOGLQFOXGHUHIULJHUDWLRQ
x x&RQVWUXFWLQJHOHFWULFOLJKWGXW\YHKLFOHFKDUJLQJVWDWLRQVSURSRUWLRQDOWRWKHQXPEHURISDUNLQJVSDFHV DWWKHSURMHFW
x x,QVWDOOLQJVRODUSKRWRYROWDLFV\VWHPVRQWKHSURMHFWVLWHRIDVSHFLILHGHOHFWULFDOJHQHUDWLRQFDSDFLW\ VXFKDVHTXDOWRWKHEXLOGLQJ¶VSURMHFWHGHQHUJ\QHHGV x x5HTXLULQJDOOVWDQGE\HPHUJHQF\JHQHUDWRUVWREHSRZHUHGE\DQRQGLHVHOIXHO x x5HTXLULQJIDFLOLW\RSHUDWRUVWRWUDLQPDQDJHUVDQGHPSOR\HHVRQHIILFLHQW VFKHGXOLQJDQGORDGPDQDJHPHQWWRHOLPLQDWHXQQHFHVVDU\TXHXLQJDQGLGOLQJRI WUXFNV
x x5HTXLULQJRSHUDWRUVWRHVWDEOLVKDQGSURPRWHDULGHVKDUHSURJUDPWKDWGLVFRXUDJHV VLQJOHRFFXSDQF\YHKLFOHWULSVDQGSURYLGHVILQDQFLDOLQFHQWLYHVIRUDOWHUQDWH PRGHVRIWUDQVSRUWDWLRQLQFOXGLQJFDUSRROLQJSXEOLFWUDQVLWDQGELNLQJ x x0HHWLQJ&DO*UHHQ7LHUJUHHQEXLOGLQJVWDQGDUGVLQFOXGLQJDOOSURYLVLRQV UHODWHGWRGHVLJQDWHGSDUNLQJIRUFOHDQDLUYHKLFOHVHOHFWULFYHKLFOHFKDUJLQJDQG ELF\FOHSDUNLQJ
x x$FKLHYLQJFHUWLILFDWLRQRIFRPSOLDQFHZLWK/(('JUHHQEXLOGLQJVWDQGDUGV x x3URYLGLQJPHDORSWLRQVRQVLWHRUVKXWWOHVEHWZHHQWKHIDFLOLW\DQGQHDUE\PHDO GHVWLQDWLRQV
x x3RVWLQJVLJQVDWHYHU\WUXFNH[LWGULYHZD\SURYLGLQJGLUHFWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQWRWKH WUXFNURXWH
x x,PSURYLQJDQGPDLQWDLQLQJYHJHWDWLRQDQGWUHHFDQRS\IRUUHVLGHQWVLQDQGDURXQG WKHSURMHFWDUHD
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 6 x x5HTXLULQJWKDWHYHU\WHQDQWWUDLQLWVVWDIILQFKDUJHRINHHSLQJYHKLFOHUHFRUGVLQ GLHVHOWHFKQRORJLHVDQGFRPSOLDQFHZLWK&$5%UHJXODWLRQVE\DWWHQGLQJ&$5%DSSURYHGFRXUVHV $OVRUHTXLUHIDFLOLW\RSHUDWRUVWRPDLQWDLQUHFRUGVRQVLWHGHPRQVWUDWLQJFRPSOLDQFHDQGPDNHUHFRUGV DYDLODEOHIRULQVSHFWLRQE\WKHORFDOMXULVGLFWLRQDLUGLVWULFWDQGVWDWHXSRQUHTXHVW x x5HTXLULQJWHQDQWVWRHQUROOLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\¶V6PDUW:D\ SURJUDPDQGUHTXLULQJWHQDQWVWRXVHFDUULHUVWKDWDUH6PDUW:D\FDUULHUV 3DJH
x3URYLGLQJWHQDQWVZLWKLQIRUPDWLRQRQLQFHQWLYHSURJUDPVVXFKDVWKH&DUO0R\HU3URJUDPDQG9RXFKHU ,QFHQWLYH3URJUDPWRXSJUDGHWKHLUIOHHWV
VI. Noise Impacts Analysis and Mitigation
7KHQRLVHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKORJLVWLFVIDFLOLWLHVFDQEHDPRQJWKHLUPRVWLQWUXVLYHLPSDFWVWRQHDUE\VHQVLWLYH UHFHSWRUV9DULRXVVRXUFHVVXFKDVXQORDGLQJDFWLYLW\GLHVHOWUXFNPRYHPHQWDQGURRIWRSDLUFRQGLWLRQLQJ XQLWVFDQFRQWULEXWHVXEVWDQWLDOQRLVHSROOXWLRQ7KHVHLPSDFWVDUHH[DFHUEDWHGE\ORJLVWLFVIDFLOLWLHV¶W\SLFDO KRXUVHYHQGD\VSHUZHHNRSHUDWLRQ&RQVWUXFWLRQQRLVHLVRIWHQHYHQJUHDWHUWKDQRSHUDWLRQDOQRLVHVRLID SURMHFWVLWHLVQHDUVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVGHYHORSHUVDQGOHDGDJHQFLHVVKRXOGDGRSWPHDVXUHVWRUHGXFHWKHQRLVH JHQHUDWHGE\ERWKFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGRSHUDWLRQDFWLYLWLHV ([DPSOHVRIEHVWSUDFWLFHVZKHQVWXG\LQJQRLVHLPSDFWVLQFOXGH
x x3UHSDULQJDQRLVHLPSDFWDQDO\VLVWKDWFRQVLGHUVDOOUHDVRQDEO\IRUHVHHDEOHSURMHFWQRLVHLPSDFWV LQFOXGLQJWRQHDUE\VHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV$OOUHDVRQDEO\IRUHVHHDEOHSURMHFWQRLVHLPSDFWVHQFRPSDVVHV QRLVHIURPERWKFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGRSHUDWLRQVLQFOXGLQJVWDWLRQDU\RQVLWHDQGRIIVLWHQRLVHVRXUFHV x x$GRSWLQJDORZHUVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROGIRULQFUHPHQWDOQRLVHLQFUHDVHVZKHQEDVHOLQHQRLVHDOUHDG\ H[FHHGVWRWDOQRLVHVLJQLILFDQFHWKUHVKROGVWRDFFRXQWIRUWKHFXPXODWLYHLPSDFWRIDGGLWLRQDOQRLVHDQG WKHIDFWWKDWDVQRLVHPRYHVXSWKHGHFLEHOVFDOHHDFKGHFLEHOLQFUHDVHLVDSURJUHVVLYHO\JUHDWHU LQFUHDVHLQVRXQGSUHVVXUHWKDQWKHODVW)RUH[DPSOHG%$LVWHQWLPHVPRUHVRXQGSUHVVXUHWKDQ G%$
([DPSOHVRIPHDVXUHVWRPLWLJDWHQRLVHLPSDFWVLQFOXGH

x x&RQVWUXFWLQJSK\VLFDOVWUXFWXUDORUYHJHWDWLYHQRLVHEDUULHUVRQDQGRURIIWKHSURMHFWVLWH x x/RFDWLQJRUSDUNLQJDOOVWDWLRQDU\FRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWDVIDUIURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVDVSRVVLEOH DQGGLUHFWLQJHPLWWHGQRLVHDZD\IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV x x9HULI\LQJWKDWFRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWKDVSURSHUO\RSHUDWLQJDQGPDLQWDLQHGPXIIOHUV x x5HTXLULQJDOOFRPEXVWLRQSRZHUHGFRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWWREHVXUURXQGHGE\DQRLVHSURWHFWLRQ EDUULHU
x x/LPLWLQJRSHUDWLRQKRXUVWRGD\WLPHKRXUVRQZHHNGD\V x x3DYLQJURDGVZKHUHWUXFNWUDIILFLVDQWLFLSDWHGZLWKORZQRLVHDVSKDOW x x2ULHQWLQJDQ\SXEOLFDGGUHVVV\VWHPVRQVLWHDZD\IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVDQG VHWWLQJV\VWHPYROXPHDWDOHYHOQRWUHDGLO\DXGLEOHSDVWWKHSURSHUW\OLQH VII. Traffic Impacts Analysis and Mitigation
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 454
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 7 :DUHKRXVHIDFLOLWLHVLQHYLWDEO\EULQJWUXFNDQGSDVVHQJHUFDUWUDIILF7UXFNWUDIILFFDQSUHVHQWVXEVWDQWLDOVDIHW\ LVVXHV&ROOLVLRQVZLWKKHDY\GXW\WUXFNVDUHHVSHFLDOO\GDQJHURXVIRUSDVVHQJHUFDUVPRWRUF\FOHVELF\FOHV DQGSHGHVWULDQV7KHVHFRQFHUQVFDQEHHYHQJUHDWHULI

3DJH

WUXFNWUDIILFSDVVHVWKURXJKUHVLGHQWLDODUHDVVFKRRO]RQHVRURWKHUSODFHVZKHUHSHGHVWULDQVDUHFRPPRQDQG H[WUDFDXWLRQLVZDUUDQWHG
([DPSOHVRIPHDVXUHVWRPLWLJDWHWUDIILFLPSDFWVLQFOXGH
x x'HVLJQLQJFOHDUO\PDUNLQJDQGHQIRUFLQJWUXFNURXWHVWKDWNHHSWUXFNVRXWRIUHVLGHQWLDO QHLJKERUKRRGVDQGDZD\IURPRWKHUVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV x x,QVWDOOLQJVLJQVLQUHVLGHQWLDODUHDVQRWLQJWKDWWUXFNDQGHPSOR\HHSDUNLQJLVSURKLELWHG x x&RQVWUXFWLQJQHZRULPSURYHGWUDQVLWVWRSVVLGHZDONVELF\FOHODQHVDQGFURVVZDONVZLWKVSHFLDO DWWHQWLRQWRHQVXULQJVDIHURXWHVWRVFKRROV
x x&RQVXOWLQJZLWKWKHORFDOSXEOLFWUDQVLWDJHQF\DQGVHFXULQJLQFUHDVHGSXEOLFWUDQVLWVHUYLFHWRWKH SURMHFWDUHD
x x'HVLJQDWLQJDUHDVIRUHPSOR\HHSLFNXSDQGGURSRII x x,PSOHPHQWLQJWUDIILFFRQWURODQGVDIHW\PHDVXUHVVXFKDVVSHHGEXPSVVSHHG OLPLWVRUQHZWUDIILFVLJQVRUVLJQDOV
x x3ODFLQJIDFLOLW\HQWU\DQGH[LWSRLQWVRQPDMRUVWUHHWVWKDWGRQRWKDYHDGMDFHQW VHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV
x x5HVWULFWLQJWKHWXUQVWUXFNVFDQPDNHHQWHULQJDQGH[LWLQJWKHIDFLOLW\WRURXWH WUXFNVDZD\IURPVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV
x x&RQVWUXFWLQJURDGZD\LPSURYHPHQWVWRLPSURYHWUDIILFIORZ x x3UHSDULQJDFRQVWUXFWLRQWUDIILFFRQWUROSODQSULRUWRJUDGLQJGHWDLOLQJWKH ORFDWLRQVRIHTXLSPHQWVWDJLQJDUHDVPDWHULDOVWRFNSLOHVSURSRVHGURDGFORVXUHVDQGKRXUVRI FRQVWUXFWLRQRSHUDWLRQVDQGGHVLJQLQJWKHSODQWRPLQLPL]HLPSDFWVWRURDGVIUHTXHQWHGE\SDVVHQJHU FDUVSHGHVWULDQVELF\FOLVWVDQGRWKHUQRQWUXFNWUDIILF VIII. Other Significant Environmental Impacts Analysis and Mitigation :DUHKRXVHSURMHFWVPD\UHVXOWLQVLJQLILFDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVWRRWKHUUHVRXUFHVVXFKDVWRDHVWKHWLFV FXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHVHQHUJ\JHRORJ\RUKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOV$OOVLJQLILFDQWDGYHUVHHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVPXVW EHHYDOXDWHGGLVFORVHGDQGPLWLJDWHGWRWKHH[WHQWIHDVLEOHXQGHU&(4$([DPSOHVRIEHVWSUDFWLFHVDQG PLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVWRUHGXFHHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVWKDWGRQRWIDOOXQGHUDQ\RIWKHDERYHFDWHJRULHVLQFOXGH

x x$SSRLQWLQJDFRPSOLDQFHRIILFHUZKRLVUHVSRQVLEOHIRULPSOHPHQWLQJDOOPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVDQG SURYLGLQJFRQWDFWLQIRUPDWLRQIRUWKHFRPSOLDQFHRIILFHUWRWKHOHDGDJHQF\WREHXSGDWHGDQQXDOO\ x x&UHDWLQJDIXQGWRPLWLJDWHLPSDFWVRQDIIHFWHGUHVLGHQWVVFKRROVSODFHVRIZRUVKLSDQGRWKHU FRPPXQLW\LQVWLWXWLRQVE\UHWURILWWLQJWKHLUSURSHUW\)RUH[DPSOHUHWDLQLQJDFRQWUDFWRUWR F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 455
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 8 UHWURILWLQVWDOO+9$&DQGRUDLUILOWUDWLRQV\VWHPVGRRUVGXDOSDQHGZLQGRZVDQGVRXQGDQG YLEUDWLRQGHDGHQLQJLQVXODWLRQDQGFXUWDLQV
x x6ZHHSLQJVXUURXQGLQJVWUHHWVRQDGDLO\EDVLVGXULQJFRQVWUXFWLRQWRUHPRYHDQ\FRQVWUXFWLRQUHODWHG GHEULVDQGGLUW
x x'LUHFWLQJDOOOLJKWLQJDWWKHIDFLOLW\LQWRWKHLQWHULRURIWKHVLWH 3DJH
x x8VLQJIXOOFXWRIIOLJKWVKLHOGVDQGRUDQWLJODUHOLJKWLQJ x x8VLQJFRROSDYHPHQWWRUHGXFHKHDWLVODQGHIIHFWV x x,QVWDOOLQJFOLPDWHFRQWUROLQWKHZDUHKRXVHIDFLOLW\WRSURPRWHZRUNHUZHOOEHLQJ x x,QVWDOOLQJDLUILOWUDWLRQLQWKHZDUHKRXVHIDFLOLW\WRSURPRWHZRUNHUZHOOEHLQJ ThefinalenvironmentaldocumentsmustmakesurewhatyoureadabovefromtheAG’sofficeisincorporated intothispossiblewarehouseprojecttoprotectcurrentnearbyresidentsaswellaswarehouseworkersfrom boththeprojectsiteaswellasfromtheproject’sdieselequipment/trucktraffic..Theimpactstothe environmentwillbesignificantlyreducedinournonͲattainme ntareaiftheproject’sfinaldocuments/staff report/conditionsofapprovalincludeswhattheAGprovidedabove— butcurrentlydoesn’t.CurrentC&E documentsfailtoincorporatesuggestedreasonable/feasiblemitigationinareassuchasNoise,Traffic,Light Pollution,RenewableEnergy,AirQuality,andGreenhouseGas(G HG)inbothconstructionandoperation.The currentC&E’sIS/MNDdoesn’tevenanalyzethoselistedintheprevioussentencefordirect,indirect,cumulative andgrowthinducingimpacts

To reduce the exposure of toxic diesel PM emissions in disadvantaged communities already disproportionally impacted by air pollution as are those in C&E’s census tract, the final design of the Project should include all existing and emerging zero-emission technologies to minimize diesel PM and oxides of nitrogen (NO
x) emissions, as well as the greenhouse gases that
contribute to climate change. CARB encourages cities like Moreno Valley and the C&E applicant to implement the measures listed in Attachment A found below to reduce the Project’s construction and operational air pollution emissions.

TheCARB’sAttachmentAmentionedaboveisfoundbelowmyname,buttheC&E’sIS/MNDfailstoaddressand incorporateCARB’sconcernsandstronglywordedrecommendationsforwarehouses.ItisimportantthatC&E's finalenvironmentaldocuments/staffreport/conditionslofapprovaldonotmakethesameomissionsasisvery apparentinthecurrentIS/MNDbyinco
rporatingboththeAG’sletterandCARB'sAttachmentAintotheC&E warehousefinalproject….otherwise itwillbeinadequateandharmfultoboththeenvironmentandpeople.
TheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB)providedAttachmentAfoundbelowmynametothecityonthe MorenoValleyTradeCenter(MVTC),theHeaco ckCommerceCenter(HCC),Thecitythereforehadthis knowledgeduringtheprocessingoftheC&E’sapplicationandfailedtoapplyituptothispoint. F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 456
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 9
Thereisnoexcuseforthecitynottoapply/requirethatwhichiscontainedinCARB’sAttachmentAfromday oneonthisprojectandtheSierraClubexpectstoseetheminthefinalprojectpriortofinalapproval.We, however,haveseriousconcernthatanycommentsmadebythepub lic andagencieswillbedealtwithseriously andincorporatedintotheprojectbecausethecityispushingforapprovalinlessthan30days.TheCityissued the20daynoticeonFebruary9thfortheC&E’sInitialStudy/MitigatedNegativeDeclaration(IS/MND)with commentsdueWednesdayMarch1standfinalapprovalbeforethePlanningCommissiononMarch9th.

Pleasekeepmeinformedofalldocumentsandmeetingsrelatedtothisproject.
Sincerely,

GeorgeHague
SierraClub
MorenoValleyGroup
ConservationChair

ATTACHMENT A
Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recommends developers and government planners use all existing and emerging zero to near-zero emission technologies during project construction and operation to minimize public exposure to air pollution. Below are some measures, currently recommended by CARB, specific to warehouse and distribution center projects. These recommendations are subject to change as new zero-emission technologies become available.

Recommended Construction Measures

1. Ensure the cleanest possible construction practices and equipment are used. This includes eliminating the idling of diesel-powered equipment and providing the necessary F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 457
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 10 infrastructure (e.g., electrical hookups) to support zero and near-zero equipment and tools.

2. Implement, and plan accordingly for, the necessary infrastructure to support the zero and near-zero emission technology vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site. Necessary infrastructure may include the physical (e.g., needed footprint), energy, and fueling infrastructure for construction equipment, on-site vehicles and equipment, and medium-heavy and heavy-heavy duty trucks.

3. In construction contracts, include language that requires all off-road diesel-powered equipment used during construction to be equipped with Tier 4 or cleaner engines, except for specialized construction equipment in which Tier 4 engines are not available.

In place of Tier 4 engines, off-road equipment can incorporate retrofits, such that, emission reductions achieved equal or exceed that of a Tier 4 engine.

4. In construction contracts, include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction be battery powered.

5. In construction contracts, include language that requires all heavy-duty trucks entering the construction site, during the grading and building construction phases be model year 2014 or later. All heavy-duty haul trucks should also meet CARB’s lowest optional low- oxides of nitrogen (NO
x) standard starting in the year 2022.1

1. In 2013, CARB adopted optional low-NOx emission standards for on-road heavy-duty engines. CARB encourages engine manufacturers to introduce new technologies to reduce NOx emissions below the current mandatory on-road heavy-duty diesel engine emission standards for model year 2010 and later. CARB’s optional low-NOx emission standard is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/optionnox/optionnox.htm.
Attachment - 1

6. In construction contracts, include language that requires all construction equipment and fleets to be in compliance with all current air quality regulations. CARB is available to assist in implementing this recommendation.

Recommended Operation Measures

6. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires tenants to use the cleanest technologies available, and to provide the necessary infrastructure to support zero-emission vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site.

7. Include contractual language intenant lease agreements that requires all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units. This requirement will substantially decrease the amount of time that a TRU powered by a fossil-fueled internal combustion engine can operate at the project site. Use of zero-emission all- electric plug-in TRUs, hydrogen fuel cell transport refrigeration, and cryogenic transport refrigeration are encouraged and can also be included in lease agreements. 2 8. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all TRUs entering the project site be plug-in capable.

9. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires future tenants to exclusively use zero-emission light and medium-duty delivery trucks and vans.

10. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements requiring all TRUs, trucks, and cars entering the Project site be zero-emission.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 458
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 11 11. Include contractual language intenant lease agreements that requires all service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks) used within the project site to be zero-emission. This equipment is widely available.

12. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all heavy-duty trucks entering or on the project site to be model year 2014 or later, expedite a transition to zero-emission vehicles, and be fully zero-emission beginning in 2030.

2. CARB’s Technology Assessment for Transport Refrigerators provides information on the current and projected development of TRUs, including current and anticipated costs. The assessment is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/tech/techreport/tru_07292015.pdf.
Attachment - 2

8. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires the tenant be in, and monitor compliance with, all current air quality regulations for on-road trucks including CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) Greenhouse Gas Regulation,3 Periodic Smoke Inspection Program (PSIP),4 and the Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation.5

9. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements restricting trucks and support equipment from idling longer than 5 minutes while on site.

10.Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that limits on-site TRU diesel engine runtime to no longer than 15 minutes. If no cold storage operations are planned, include contractual language and permit conditions that prohibit cold storage operations unless a health risk assessment is conducted, and the health impacts fully mitigated.

11.Include rooftop solar panels for each proposed warehouse to the extent feasible, with a capacity that matches the maximum allowed for distributed solar connections to the grid.

3. In December 2008, CARB adopted a regulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by improving the fuel efficiency of heavy-duty t ractors that pull 53-foot or longer box-type trailers. The regulation applies primarily to owners of 53-foot or longer box-type trailer s, including both dry- van and refrigerated-van trailers, and owners of the heavy-duty tractors that pull them on California highways. CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor- Trailer) Greenhouse Gas Regulation is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/hdghg/hdghg.htm.

4. The PSIP program requires that diesel and bus fleet owners conduct annual smoke opacity inspections of their vehicles and repai r those with excessive smoke emissions to ensure compliance. CARB’s PSIP program is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/enf/hdvip/hdvip.htm.

5. The regulation requires that newer heavier trucks and buses must meet particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all tru cks and buses will need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent. CARB’s Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 459
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

BLUM, COLLINS & HO, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

AON CENTER
707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 4880
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
(213) 572-0400

)HEUXDU\

-XOLD'HVFRWHDX[ 9,$(0$,/72

6HQLRU3ODQQHU MXOLDG#PRYDORUJ &LW\RI0RUHQR9DOOH\
)UHGHULFN6WUHHW
0RUHQR9DOOH\&$

SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON COTTONWOOD AND EDGEMONT MND (SCH NO. 2023020234)

'HDU0V'HVFRWHDX[

7KDQN\RXIRUWKHRSSRUWXQLW\WRFRPPHQWRQWKH0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQ 01'
IRUWKH
SURSRVHG&RWWRQZRRGDQG(GJHPRQW:DUHKRXVH3URMHFW3OHDVHDFF HSWDQGFRQVLGHUWKHVH FRPPHQWV RQ EHKDOI RI *ROGHQ 6WDWH (QYLURQPHQWDO -XVWLFH $OOLDQF H $O VR * R O GH Q6W D WH (QYLURQPHQWDO-XVWLFH$OOLDQFHIRUPDOO\UHTXHVWVWREHDGGHGWRWKHSXEOLFLQWHUHVWOLVWUHJDUGLQJ DQ\ VXEVHTXHQW HQYLURQPHQWDO GRFXPHQWV SXEOLF QRWLFHV SXEOLFKHDULQJV DQG QRWLFHV RI GHWHUPLQDWLRQIRUWKLVSURMHFW6HQGDOOFRPPXQLFDWLRQVWR*RO GHQ6WDWH(QYLURQPHQWDO-XVWLFH $OOLDQFH32%R[
&RURQD&$

1.0 Summary
7KHSURMHFWSURSRVHVWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGRSHUDWLRQRIWZR
OLJKWLQGXVWULDOEXLOGLQJVZLWKD
WRWDOFRPELQHGEXLOGLQJIORRUDUHDRI

VTXDUHIHHW
VI
RQDQDSSUR[LPDWHO\
JURVVDFUH
SURSHUW\
QHWDFUHV
(DFKSURSRVHGEXLOGLQJZLOOEHDWR WDORI
VIFRPSULVHGRI
VIRIZDUHKRXVLQJVSDFHDQGVIRIRIILFHVSDFH (DFKEXLOGLQJLQFOXGHV SDVVHQJHUYHKLFOHSDUNLQJVSDFHV%XLOGLQJLQFOXGHVWUXFNWUDLOHUSDUNLQJVSDFHVDQG%XLOGLQJ LQFOXGHV
WUXFNWUDLOHUSDUNLQJVSDFHV

3.0 Air Quality
3OHDVHUHIHUWRDWWDFKPHQWVIURP6:$3(IRUDFRPSOHWHWHFKQLFDOFRPPHQWDU\DQGDQDO\VLV 7KH01'GRHVQRWLQFOXGHIRUDQDO\VLVUHOHYDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOMX VWLFHLVVXHVLQUHYLHZLQJ SRWHQWLDOLPSDFWVLQFOXGLQJFXPXODWLYHLPSDFWVIURPWKHSURSRV HGSURMHFW7KLVLVHVSHFLDOO\ F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 460
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH
VLJQLILFDQW DV WKH VXUURXQGLQJ FRPPXQLW\ LV KLJKO\ EXUGHQHG E\SROOXWLRQ $FFRUGLQJ WR&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQ&DO(3$¶VVFUHHQLQJWRROWKDWUDQNVHDFKFHQVXVWUDFWLQWKHV WDWHIRU SROOXWLRQDQGVRFLRHFRQRPLFYXOQHUDELOLW\WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW¶VFHQVXVWUDFW
UDQNV
ZRUVHWKDQ

RIWKHUHVWRIWKHVWDWHRYHUDOOLQRYHUDOOSROO XWLRQEXUGHQ7KHVXUURXQGLQJ FRPPXQLW\LQFOXGLQJUHVLGHQFHVLPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQW
VKDUHVSURSHUW\OLQHZLWKWKHSURMHFWVLWH

WRWKHQRUWKDQGVRXWK(GJHPRQW(OHPHQWDU\6FKRROWRWKHQRUWKDQGDGGLWLRQDOUHVLGHQFHVWRWKH HDVWEHDUVWKHLPSDFWRIPXOWLSOHVRXUFHVRISROOXWLRQDQGLVPRUHSROOXWHGWKDQRWKHUFHQVXVWUDFWV LQPDQ\SROOXWLRQLQGLFDWRUVPHDVXUHGE\&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQ)RUH[DPSOHWKHSURMHFWFHQVXVWUDFW UDQNVLQWKH

WKSHUFHQWLOHIRUR]RQHEXUGHQWKSHUFHQWLOH IRUSDUWLFXODWHPDWWHU 30
EXUGHQWKSHUFHQWLOHIRUGLHVHO30EXUGHQDQGWKSHUFHQWLOHIRUWUDIILFEXUGHQV$OORIWKHVH HQYLURQPHQWDOIDFWRUVDUHW\SLFDOO\DWWULEXWHGWRKHDY\WUXFNDFWLYLW\LQWKHDUHD2]RQHFDQFDXVH OXQJLUULWDWLRQLQIODPPDWLRQDQGZRUVHQLQJRIH[LVWLQJFKURQL FKHDOWKFRQGLWLRQVHYHQDWORZ OHYHOVRIH[SRVXUH7KHYHU\VPDOOSDUWLFOHVRIGLHVHO30FDQUHDFKGHHSLQWRWK HOXQJZKHUH WKH\FDQFRQWULEXWHWRDUDQJHRIKHDOWKSUREOHPV7KHVHLQFOXG HLUULWDWLRQWRWKHH\HVWKURDWDQG QRVHKHDUWDQGOXQJGLVHDVHDQGOXQJFDQFHU

7KHFHQVXVWUDFWDOVREHDUVPRUHLPSDFWVIURPFOHDQXSVLWHVWKDQRIWKHVWDWH&KHPLFDOVLQ WKHEXLOGLQJVVRLORUZDWHUDWFOHDQXSVLWHVFDQPRYHLQWRQHDUE\FRPPXQLWLHVWKURXJKWKHDLURU PRYHPHQWRIZDWHU
7KHFHQVXVWUDFWDOVRUDQNVLQWKHWKSHUFHQWLOHIRULPSDFWV IURPWR[LFUHOHDVHV3HRSOHOLYLQJ QHDUIDFLOLWLHVWKDWHPLWWR[LFUHOHDVHVPD\EUHDWKHFRQWDPLQDW HGDLUUHJXODUO\RULIFRQWDPLQDQWV DUHUHOHDVHGGXULQJDQDFFLGHQW

7KHFHQVXVWUDFWDOVRUDQNVLQWKHWKSHUFHQWLOHIRUVROLGZDVWHIDFLOLW\LPSDFWVDQGWKSHUFHQWLOH IRUKD]DUGRXVZDVWHIDFLOLW\ LPSDFWV6ROLGZDVWHIDFLOLWLHVF DQH[SRVHSHRSOHWRKD]DUGRXV FKHPLFDOVUHOHDVHWR[LFJDVHVLQWRWKHDLU
HYHQDIWHUWKHVHIDFLOLWHVDUHFORVHG
DQGFKHPLFDOVFDQ
OHDFKLQWRVRLODURXQGWKHIDFLOLW\DQGSRVHDKHDOWKULVNWRQHDUE\SRSXODWLRQV+D]DUGRXVZDVWH JHQHUDWRUVDQGIDFLOLWLHVFRQWULEXWHWRWKHFRQWDPLQDWLRQRIDLUZDWHUDQGVRLOQHDUZDVWHJHQHUDWRUV DQGIDFLOLWLHVFDQKDUPWKHHQYLURQPHQWDVZHOODVSHRSOH

&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQUHSRUWFDOHQYLURVFUHHQ 2(++$2]RQHKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUDLUTXDOLW\R]RQH 2(++$'LHVHO3DUWLFXODWH0DWWHUKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUGLHVHOSDUWLFXODWH PDWWHU
2(++$&OHDQXS6LWHVKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUFOHDQXSVLWHV 2(++$7R[LF5HOHDVHVKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUWR[LFUHOHDVHVIDFLOLWLHV 2(++$6ROLG:DVWH)DFLOLWLHVKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUVROLGZDVWHVLWHVDQG IDFLOLWLHV
2(++$+D]DUGRXV:DVWH*HQHUDWRUVDQG)DFLOLWLHV
KWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUKD]DUGRXVZDVWHJHQHUDWRUVDQGIDFLOLWLHV F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 461
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH
)XUWKHUWKHFHQVXVWUDFWLVDGLYHUVHFRPPXQLW\LQFOXGLQJ +LVSDQLFDQG$IULFDQ $PHULFDQUHVLGHQWVZKRPDUHHVSHFLDOO\YXOQHUDEOHWRWKHLPSDFWVRISROOXWLRQ7KHFRPPXQLW\ KDVDKLJKUDWHRIORZHGXFDWLRQDODWWDLQPHQWPHDQLQJ RIWKHFHQVXVWUDFWRYHUDJHKDVQRW
DWWDLQHGDKLJKVFKRROGLSORPD7KHFRPPXQLW\DOVRKDVDKLJKUDWHRISRYHUW\PHDQLQJ RI
WKHKRXVHKROGVLQWKHFHQVXVWUDFWKDYHDWRWDOLQFRPHEHIRUHW D[HVWKDWLVOHVVWKDQWKHSRYHUW\ OHYHO,QFRPHFDQDIIHFWKHDOWKZKHQSHRSOHFDQQRWDIIRUGKHDOWK\OLYLQJDQGZRUNLQJFRQGLWLRQV QXWULWLRXVIRRGDQGQHFHVVDU\PHGLFDOFDUH 3RRUFRPPXQLWLHVDUHRIWHQORFDWHGLQDUHDVZLWK KLJKOHYHOVRISROOXWLRQ
3RYHUW\FDQFDXVHVWUHVVWKDWZHDNHQVWKHLPPXQHV\VWHPDQG FDXVHV SHRSOHWREHFRPHLOOIURPSROOXWLRQ/LYLQJLQSRYHUW\LVDOVRDQLQGLFDWLRQWKDWUHVLGHQWVPD\ ODFNKHDOWKLQVXUDQFHRUDFFHVVWRPHGLFDOFDUH0HGLFDOFDUHLVYLWDOIRUWKLVFHQVXVWUDFWDVLWUDQNV LQWKHWKSHUFHQWLOHIRULQFLGHQFHRIFDUGLRYDVFXODUGLVHDVHDQG WKSHUFHQWLOHIRULQFLGHQFHRI
DVWKPD7KHFRPPXQLW\DOVRKDVDKLJKUDWHRIOLQJXLVWLFLVRO DWLRQPHDQLQJ RIWKHFHQVXV
WUDFWVSHDNVOLWWOHWRQR(QJOLVKDQGIDFHVIXUWKHULQHTXLWLHVDVDUHVXOW
$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW¶VFHQVXVWUDFW

DQGWKHFHQVXVWUDFWVDGMDFHQWWR
WKH SURMHFW VLWH

VRXWK
DQG
HDVW

DUH LGHQWLILHG DV6%
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
&%(&&
LV WKH6WDWH¶VRQO\DSSURYHG
HQHUJ\FRPSOLDQFHPRGHOLQJVRIWZDUHIRUQRQUHVLGHQWLDOEXLOGLQJVLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWK7LWOH &DO((0RGLVQRWOLVWHGDVDQDSSURYHGVRIWZDUH7KH&DO((0RGE DVHGPRGHOLQJLQWKH01' DQGDSSHQGLFHVGRHVQRWFRPSO\ZLWKWKH%XLOGLQJ(QHUJ\(IILFLHQF\6WDQGDUGVDQGXQGHU UHSRUWVWKHSURMHFWVVLJQLILFDQW(QHUJ\LPSDFWVDQGIXHOFRQVXP SWLRQWRWKHSXEOLFDQGGHFLVLRQ PDNHUV6LQFHWKH01'GLGQRWDFFXUDWHO\RUDGHTXDWHO\PRGHOWKHHQHUJ\LPSDFWVLQFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK7LWOHDILQGLQJRIVLJQLILFDQFHPXVWEHPDGH$Q(,5ZLWKPRGHOLQJXVLQJWKHDSSURYHG

2(++$3RYHUW\KWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQLQGLFDWRUSRYHUW\

,ELG
,ELG
2(++$6%&HQVXV7UDFWVKWWSV
RHKKDFDJRYFDOHQYLURVFUHHQVE
&DOLIRUQLD(QHUJ\&RPPLVVLRQ(QHUJ\&RGH&RPSOLDQFH6RIWZDUH KWWSV
ZZZHQHUJ\FDJRYSURJUDPVDQGWRSLFVSURJUDPVEXLOGLQJHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\VWDQGDUGV EXLOGLQJHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 462
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH
VRIWZDUH
&%(&&
PXVWEHFLUFXODWHGIRUSXEOLFUHYLHZLQRUGHUWRDGHTXDWHO\DQDO\]HWKHSURMHFWV VLJQLILFDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWV7KLVLVYLWDODVWKH01'XWLOL]HV&DO((0RGDVDVRXUFHLQLWV PHWKRGRORJ\DQGDQDO\VLVZKLFKLVFOHDUO\QRWWKHDSSURYHGVRIWZDUH

4.0 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWVLWHLVZLWKLQ0DUFK$LU5HVHUYH%DVH 0$5 %
,QODQG3RUW$LUSRUW,QQHU
$SSURDFK'HSDUWXUH=RQH
&RPSDWLELOLW\=RQH%
DQGWKH3ULPDU\$SSURDFK'HSDUWXUH=RQH

&RPSDWLELOLW\=RQH&
7KH01'H[FOXGHVWKDWWKHSURMHFWVLWHLVDOVRZLWKLQ$FFLGHQW3RWHQWLDO =RQH,,
$3=,,
$Q(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGWRLQFOXGHWKLVLQIR UPDWLRQIRUDQDO\VLVLQRUGHUWR SURYLGHDQDGHTXDWHDQGDFFXUDWHHQYLURQPHQWDODQDO\VLV
7KH01'SURYLGHVDYHU\EULHIVWD WHPHQWWKDW³QRQVHQVLWLYHXVHV±OLNHWKHOLJKWLQGXVWULDOXVH SURSRVHGE\WKH3URMHFW±DUHDOORZHGZLWKLQ=RQHV%DQG&VXEMHFWWRGHQVLW\UHVWULFWLRQV7KH 3URMHFWZRXOGEHFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHGHQVLW\UHVWULFWLRQVRIWK H$/8&3´DQGFRQFOXGHVWKDWWKH SURMHFWZLOOKDYHOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWV7KH01'KDVQ RWSURYLGHGDQ\VXSSRUWLQJ HYLGHQFHWRVXEVWDQWLDWHWKHVHFODLPVVXFKDVLQFOXGLQJWKHGHQVLW\UHVWULFWLRQVRIWKH0$5%,3$ $/8&3DQGGHPRQVWUDWLQJKRZWKHSURMHFWFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHP
)XUWKHU0RUHQR9DOOH\0XQLFLSDO&RGH6HFWLRQ
$LUSRUW/DQG8VH&RPSDWLELOLW\3ODQ
VXEVHFWLRQ
)
VWDWHVWKDW ³RWKHUW\SHVRIODQGXVHDFWLRQVDUHVXEMHFW WRUHYLHZXQGHUWKH FLUFXPVWDQFHVGHVFULEHGLQ6HFWLRQRI&KDSWHU&RXQW\ZLGH3ROLFLHVRIWKH5LYHUVLGH&RXQW\ DLUSRUWODQGXVHFRPSDWLELOLW\SODQ´6HFWLRQ
0DMRU/DQ G8VH$FWLRQVZLWKLQ5&$/8&
&KDSWHU&RXQW\ZLGH3ROLFLHVVWDWHVWKDW$/8&UHYLHZRIWKHIROORZLQJDFWLRQVDUHUHTXLUHG WREHUHYLHZHG

³6HFWLRQ
0DMRU/DQG8VH$FWLRQV
A) $FWLRQVDIIHFWLQJODQGXVHVZLWKLQDQ\FRPSDWLELOLW\]RQH

$Q\GLVFUHWLRQDU\GHYHORSPHQWSURSRVDOIRUSURMHFWVKDYLQJ DEXLOGLQJIORRUDUHDRI VTXDUHIHHWRUJUHDWHUXQOHVVRQO\PLQLVWHULDODSSURYDO HJDEXLOGLQJSHUPLW
LV
UHTXLUHG

3URSRVDOVIRUQHZGHYHORSPHQW
LQFOXGLQJEXLOGLQJVDQWHQQD VDQGRWKHUVWUXFWXUHV

KDYLQJDKHLJKWRIPRUHWKDQ
IHHWZLWKLQ&RPSDWLELOLW\=RQH %%RUD+HLJKW 5HYLHZ2YHUOD\=RQH

0RUHQR9DOOH\0XQLFLSDO&RGH6HFWLRQ

KWWSV
OLEUDU\TFRGHXVOLEPRUHQRBYDOOH\BFDSXEPXQLFLSDOBFRGHLWHPWLWOHB FKDSWHUB
BDUWLFOHBL

BB
5&$/8&&KDSWHU&RXQW\ZLGH3ROLFLHV
KWWSV
ZZZUFDOXFRUJ3RUWDOV3')*HQHUDOSODQQHZSODQ 9RO&RXQW\ZLGH3ROLFLHVSGI
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 463
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH

G
$Q\RWKHUSURSRVHGODQGXVHDFWLRQDVGHWHUPLQHGE\WKHOR FDOSODQQLQJDJHQF\LQYROYLQJD TXHVWLRQRIFRPSDWLELOLW\ZLWKDLUSRUWDFWLYLWLHV´

5HJDUGLQJ6HFWLRQ
D
WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWLVVXEMHFWWR5&$/8&UHYLHZGXHWRWKHVL]HRI LWVEXLOGLQJIORRUDUHD
UHTXLUHPHQW
DQGKHLJKWRIIHHW
UHTXLUHPHQW

)XUWKHUUHJDUGLQJ
6HFWLRQ
G
WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWLVVXEMHFWWR5&$/8&UHY LHZGXHWR0RUHQR9DOOH\ 0XQLFLSDO&RGH6HFWLRQ

+

F
WKDWVWDWHV³:KHUHDGLVFUHWLRQDU\DFWLRQLVSURSRVHG ZLWKLQDQ$3=RU&OHDU=RQHWKH'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH$LU)RUFHG$LU0RELOLW\:LQJ $)5&

0DUFK$LU5HVHUYH%DVHVKDOOEHFRQVXOWHGWRGHWHUPLQHZKHWKHUWKHSURSRVHGGLVFUHWLRQDU\DFWLRQ LVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH$LU)RUFHJXLGDQFHUHIHUHQFHGDERYH6XFKFRQVXOWDWLRQZRXOGEHLQDGGLWLRQ WRDQGVKDOOQRWEHLQOLHXRIUHTXLUHPHQWVRIWKH0DUFK$/8& 3RUDQ\UHYLHZIRUDLUSRUWODQG XVHFRPSDWLELOLW\WKDWPD\EHUHTXLUHGE\WKH5LYHUVLGH&RXQW\$/8&´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

6.0 Land Use and Planning

7KH01'GRHVQRWSURYLGHDFRQVLVWHQF\DQDO\VLVZLWKWKH0XQLFLSDO&RGH$VVWDWHGDERYHWKH SURMHFWLVQRWFRQVLVWHQWZLWK0RUHQR9DOOH\0XQLFLSDO&RGH6HF WLRQ DQGKDVQRW
GHPRQVWUDWHGFRQVLVWHQF\ZLWKWKH0$5%,3$$/8&3$Q(,5PXVW EHSUHSDUHGZLWKWKLV LQIRUPDWLRQIRUDQDO\VLVLQRUGHUWRSURYLGHDQDGHTXDWHDQGDFFXUDWHHQYLURQPHQWDODQDO\VLV
7KH01'GRHVQRWLQFOXGHDFRQVLVWHQF\DQDO\VLVZLWKDQ\ODQGXVHSODQVSROLFLHVRUUHJXODWLRQV DGRSWHGIRUWKHSXUSRVHRIDYRLGLQJRUPLWLJDWLQJDQHQYLURQPHQ WDOHIIHFWVXFKDVWKH*HQHUDO 3ODQ7KH01'LVLQDGHTXDWHDVDQLQIRUPDWLRQDOGRFXPHQWDQGDQ(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGZLWKD FRQVLVWHQF\DQDO\VLVZLWKDOO*HQHUDO3ODQSROLFLHVLQFOXGLQJWKHIROORZLQJ

/&&
3URPRWHDODQGDQGUHVRXUFHHIILFLHQWGHYHORSPHQWSDWWHUQLQRUGHUWRVXSSRUWHIILFLHQW GHOLYHU\RISXEOLFVHUYLFHVDQGLQIUDVWUXFWXUHFRQVHUYHRSHQV SDFHODQGVVXUURXQGLQJWKHFLW\ UHGXFHYHKLFOHWULSOHQJWKVDQGLPSURYHDLUTXDOLW\

/&&
%DODQFHOHYHOVRIHPSOR\PHQWDQGKRXVLQJZLWKLQWKHF RPPXQLW\WRSURYLGHPRUH RSSRUWXQLWLHVIRU0RUHQR9DOOH\UHVLGHQWVWRZRUNORFDOO\FXW FRPPXWHWLPHVDQGLPSURYHDLU TXDOLW\
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 464
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH

&
:KHUHYHU SRVVLEOH PLQLPL]H WKH IUHTXHQF\ RI DFFHVV SRLQWV DORQJ VWUHHWV E\ WKH FRQVROLGDWLRQRIDFFHVVSRLQWVEHWZHHQDGMDFHQWSURSHUWLHVRQD OOFLUFXODWLRQHOHPHQWVWUHHWV H[FOXGLQJFROOHFWRUV

&
6WULYHWRPDLQWDLQ/HYHORI6HUYLFH
/26
&´RQURDGZD\ OLQNVZKHUHYHUSRVVLEOHDQG
/26 '´LQWKHYLFLQLW\RI65DQGKLJKHPSOR\PHQWFHQWHUV6W ULYHWRPDLQWDLQ/26 '´DW LQWHUVHFWLRQVGXULQJSHDNKRXUV

&
:KHUHQHZGHYHORSPHQWVZRXOGLQFUHDVHWUDIILFIORZVEH\RQGWKH/26& RU/26'ZKHUH

DSSOLFDEOH
UHTXLUHDSSURSULDWHDQGIHDVLEOHLPSURYHPHQWPHDVX UHVDVDFRQGLWLRQRIDSSURYDO 6XFKPHDVXUHVPD\LQFOXGHH[WUDULJKWRIZD\DQGLPSURYHPHQWVWRDFFRPPRGDWHDGGLWLRQDOOHIW WXUQDQGULJKWWXUQODQHVDWLQWHUVHFWLRQVRURWKHULPSURYHPHQWV
&
5HTXLUHGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWVWRFRPSOHWHWUDIILFLPSDFWVWXGLHVWKDWFRQGXFWYHKLFOHPLOHV WUDYHOHGDQDO\VLVDQGOHYHORIVHUYLFHDVVHVVPHQWDVDSSURSULDWHSHUWUDIILFLPSDFWVWXG\JXLGHOLQHV
&
:RUNWRUHGXFH907WKURXJKODQGXVHSODQQLQJHQKDQFHGW UDQVLWDFFHVVORFDOL]HG DWWUDFWLRQVDQGDFFHVVWRQRQDXWRPRWLYHPRGHV

*RDO(-
5HGXFHSROOXWLRQH[SRVXUHDQGLPSURYHFRPPXQLW\KHDOWK
(-
5HTXLUHQHZGHYHORSPHQWWKDWZRXOGORFDWHVHQVLWLYHXVHVDGMDFHQWWRVRXUFHVRIWR[LFDLU FRQWDPLQDQWV
7$&
WREHGHVLJQHGWRPLQLPL]HDQ\SRWHQWLDOKHD OWKULVNVFRQVLVWHQWZLWK6WDWH ODZ

3URYLGLQJDFRPSOHWHFRQVLVWHQF\LQFRQVLVWHQF\DQDO\VLVLVYLWD ODVWKHSURMHFWLVLPPHGLDWHO\ DGMDFHQWWRUHVLGHQWLDOSURSHUWLHVLQD6%GHVLJQDWHG'LVDGYDQWDJHG&RPPXQLW\ 7KH01'DOVRVWDWHVWKDWWKHSURMHFW³WKH3URMHFWZRXOGQRWFRQ IOLFWZLWKDQ\DSSOLFDEOHJRDOV REMHFWLYHVDQGSROLFLHVRIWKH6&$40'V$4036&$*V&RQQHFW6R&DO5736&6 DQG6&$*V5HJLRQDO&RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQ´UHVXOWLQJLQOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWV+RZHYHU WKH01'GRHVQRWSURYLGHDQ\PHDQLQJIXOVXSSRUWLQJHYLGHQFHRU FRQVLVWHQF\DQDO\VLVZLWK 6&$*¶V&RQQHFW6R&DO5736&6WRVXSSRUWWKLVFRQFOXVLRQLQYLRODWLRQRI&(4$¶V UHTXLUHPHQWVIRUPHDQLQJIXOGLVFORVXUH
&(4$
E

'XH WRHUURUVLQPRGHOLQJDQG
PRGHOLQJZLWKRXWVXSSRUWLQJHYLGHQFHDVQRWHGWKURXJKRXWWKLV FRPPHQWOHWWHUWKHSURSRVHG SURMHFWKDVVLJQLILDQWSRWHQWLDOIRULQFRQVLVWHQF\ZLWK*RDOWRUHGXFHJUHHQKRXVHJDVHPLVVLRQV DQGLPSURYHDLUTXDOLW\*RDOWRVXSSRUWKHDOWK\DQGHTXLWDEOHFRPPXQLWLHVDQG*RDOWRDGDSW WRDFKDQJLQJFOLPDWH$Q(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGWRLQFOXGHDQD QDO\VLVZLWKWKH 5736&6&RQQHFW6R&DOGRFXPHQW
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 465
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH

14.0 Population and Housing
7KH01'XWLOL]HVXQFHUWDLQODQJXDJHDQGGRHVQRWSURYLGHDQ\PHDQLQJIXODQDO\VLVRUVXSSRUWLQJ HYLGHQFHWRVXEVWDQWLDWHWKHFRQFOXVLRQWKDWWKHUHZLOOEHQRV LJQLILFDQWLPSDFWWRSRSXODWLRQDQG KRXVLQJ7KH01'VWDWHVWKDW³LWLVanticipatedWKDWWKHHPSOR\PHQWEDVHIRUERWKWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQ DQGRSHUDWLRQDOSKDVHVRIWKH3URMHFWZRXOGFRPHIURPWKHH[LVW LQJSRSXODWLRQLQWKH,QODQG (PSLUHZKLFKFRPSULVHVZHVWHUQ5LYHUVLGH&RXQW\DQGVRXWKZHVWH UQ6DQ%HUQDUGLQR&RXQW\´ 5HO\LQJRQWKHZRUNIRUFHSRSXODWLRQRIWKHHQWLUH,QODQG(PSLUH UHJLRQZLOOLQFUHDVHSURMHFW UHODWHG9077KH01'GRHVQRW SURYLGHDFDOFXODWLRQRIMREVFU HDWHGE\WKHSURMHFWGXULQJ FRQVWUXFWLRQRURSHUDWLRQV

7KH01'KDVQRWSURYLGHGDQ\FDOFXODWLRQRIWKHMREVJHQHUDWHG E\WKHSURMHFWRUHYLGHQFHWKDW WKH,QODQG(PSLUHUHJLRQ¶VZRUNIRUFHSRSXODWLRQLVTXDOLILHGIR URULQWHUHVWHGLQZRUNLQWKH LQGXVWULDO VHFWRU 6&$*¶V (PSOR\PHQW 'HQVLW\ 6WXG\SURYLGHV WKH IROORZLQJ DSSOLFDEOH HPSOR\PHQWJHQHUDWLRQUDWHVIRU5LYHUVLGH&RXQW\

:DUHKRXVH
HPSOR\HHSHUVTXDUHIHHW
2IILFH
HPSOR\HHSHUVTXDUHIHHW

$SSO\LQJWKHVHUDWLRVUHVXOWVLQWKHIROORZLQJFDOFXODWLRQ
:DUHKRXVH

VI
2IILFH
VIVI
7RWDO
HPSOR\HHV

8WLOL]LQJ6&$*V(PSOR\PHQW'HQV LW\6WXG\UDWLRVWKHSURSRVHGS URMHFWZLOOJHQHUDWH HPSOR\HHV7KH01'XWLOL]HVXQFHUWDLQDQGPLVOHDGLQJODQJXDJHZ KLFKGRHVQRWSURYLGHDQ\ PHDQLQJIXODQDO\VLVRIWKHSURMHFWVSRSXODWLRQDQGHPSOR\PHQWJ HQHUDWLRQ,QRUGHUWRFRPSO\ ZLWK&(4$VUHTXLUHPHQWVIRUPHDQLQJIXOGLVFORVXUHDQ(,5PXVW EHSUHSDUHGWRSURYLGHDQ DFFXUDWHHVWLPDWHRIHPSOR\HHVJHQHUDWHGE\DOOXVHVRIWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW,WPXVWDOVRSURYLGH GHPRJUDSKLFDQGJHRJUDSKLFLQIRUPDWLRQRQ WKH ORFDWLRQRITXDOL ILHGZRUNHUVWRILOOWKHVH SRVLWLRQV
$GGLWLRQDOO\WKH01'FRQFOXGHVWKDWWKH³ regionDOUHDG\FRQWDLQVDQDPSOHVXSSO\RISRWHQWLDO HPSOR\HHVXQGHUH[LVWLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGWKH3URMHFWVODERUGHPD QGLVQRW expectedWRGUDZ

15 6&$*(PSOR\PHQW'HQVLW\6WXG\
KWWS
ZZZPZFRJRUJILOHDVS["$ 477O7532228,ZP31].)GGMG-H/) ([MO;28'
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 466
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH
VXEVWDQWLDOQXPEHUVRIQHZUHVLGHQWVWRWKHDUHD´ZLWKRXWSURYL GLQJDQ\PHDQLQJIXOHYLGHQFHWR VXSSRUWWKLVFODLPVXFKDVWKHFXUUHQWQXPEHURIUHVLGHQWVRUWKHDQWLFLSDWHGLQFUHDVHLQUHVLGHQWV JHQHUDWHGE\DSSURYHGSURMHFWVRUFXPXODWLYHSURMHFWVLQWKHSLSHOLQH7KHDQDO\VLVPXVWSURYLGH PHDQLQJIXOHYLGHQFHWRVXSSRUWWKHFRQFOXVLRQWKDWWKHSURMHFWZLOOQRWLQGXFHXQSODQQHGLQGLUHFW RUGLUHFWSRSXODWLRQJURZWK
6&$*¶V&RQQHFW6R&DO'HPRJUDSKLFVDQG*URZWK)RUHFDVWQRWHVWKDWWKH&LW\ZLOODGG
MREVEHWZHHQ8WLOL]LQJ6&$*¶V(PSOR\PHQW'HQVLW\ 6WXG\FDOFXODWLRQRI HPSOR\HHVWKHSURMHFWUHSUHVHQWV
RIWKH&LW\VHPSOR\PHQWJURZWKIURP$Q (,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGWRLQFOXGHWKLVDQDO\VLVDQGDOVRSURYLGH DFXPXODWLYHDQDO\VLVGLVFXVVLRQ RISURMHFWVDSSURYHGVLQFHDQGSURMHFWV³LQWKHSLSHOLQH´ WRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHSURMHFWZLOO H[FHHG6&$*¶VHPSOR\PHQWJURZWKIRUHFDVWIRUWKH&LW\)RUH[D PSOHRWKHUUHFHQWLQGXVWULDO SURMHFWV VXFK DV 2OG %XVLQHVV 3DUN
HPSOR\HHV
&RPSDVV 'DQEH &HQWHUSRLQWH
:DUHKRXVH
HPSOR\HHV
DQG :RUOG /RJLVWLFV &HQWHU
GLUHFW MREV SOXV
LQGLUHFWLQGXFHGMREVLQWKH&RXQW\

MREVLQGXFHGZLWKLQ &LW\
WRWDOMREVLQFLW\

17.0 Transportation
7KHSURMHFWಬV907LPSDFWVDUHPLVUHSUHVHQWHGE\WKH:5&2*907PRGHOLQJ7KH01'UHOLHV XSRQD907VFUHHQLQJDQDO\VLVZKLFKFRQFOXGHVWKDWWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWVLWHLVORFDWHGLQDORZ 907JHQHUDWLQJ7UDIILF$QDO\VLV=RQH
7$=
ZKLFKUHVXOWVLQOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ LPSDFWV7KH907$SSHQGL[&VWDWHVWKHSURMHFWLVORFDWHGLQ7 $=,' :5&2*907
0RGHOLQJ3URJUDPQRWHVLWLV7$=,'
ZKLFKLVERXQGE\(X FDO\SWXV$YHWRWKHQRUWK
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

6&$*&RQQHFW6R&DO'HPRJUDSKLFVDQG*URZWK)RUHFDVWDGRSWHG6HSWHPEHU KWWSV
VFDJFDJRYVLWHVPDLQILOHVILOHDWWDFKPHQWV
IFRQQHFWVRFDOBGHPRJUDSKLFVDQGJURZWK
IRUHFDVWSGI"

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 467
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH

FHQWHUVWRVPDOOHULQGXVWULDOSDUNV
VXFKDVWKHSURSRVHGSURMH FW
DQGWKHQWRWKHLUILQDOGHOLYHU\
GHVWLQDWLRQV

$GGLWLRQDOO\7DEOH7ULS6XPPDU\RIWKH$LU4XDOLW\$SSHQGL [&DO((0RGRXWSXWVKHHWV LQGLFDWHVWKDWWKHSURMHFWZLOOJHQHUDWHDSSUR[LPDWHO\ DQQXDO907
GD\V GDLO\WRWDO907
7KLVLVH[SRQHQWLDOO\KLJKHUWK DQWKH907VUHSRUWHGLQWKH $SSHQGL[1RWDEO\WKH907DQDO\VLVVWDWHVWKDWWKHSURMHFW7$ =907LV907SHU HPSOR\HH ZKLFK LV ORZHU WKDQ WKH &LW\ZLGH HPSOR\PHQWEDVHG 907 RI 907 SHU HPSOR\HH7KLVLVDQHJOLJLEOHGLIIHUHQFHPLOHVWUDYHOHG)HKUDQG3HHU¶V:5&2*6% ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3DWKZD\'RFXPHQW3DFNDJHVWDWHVWKDWWKH*RYHUQRU¶V2IILFHRI3ODQQLQJDQG 5HVHDUFK
235
³UHFRPPHQGVWKDWDSHUFDSLWDRUSHUHPSOR\HH907WKDWLVILIWHHQSHUFHQWEHORZ WKDWRIH[LVWLQJGHYHORSPHQW´LVDUHDVRQDEOHWKUHVKROGWRGHWH UPLQHWKDWDSURMHFWZRXOGKDYHD OHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW907LPSDFW7KH01'¶VPLOHUHGXFWLRQLVDUHGXFWLRQLQ907 FRPSDUHGWRWKH&LW\ZLGHGDLO\DYHUDJH907ZKLFKGRHVQRWPHHWWKH235WKUHVKROGRID UHGXFWLRQLQH[LVWLQJ907EHFDXVHLWLVRQO\DUHGXFWLRQ $GGLWLRQDOO\WKH01'LV LQWHUQDOO\LQFRQVLVWHQWDVWKH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQDQDO\VLVUHOLHVRQDORZ907DUHDWRFRQFOXGHLPSDFWV ZLOOEHOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQWZKLOHWKH3RSXODWLRQDQG+RXVLQJDQDO\VLVUHOLHVRQWKHZRUNIRUFHRI WKHHQWLUH,QODQG(PSLUHUHJLRQWRILOOLWVMREVZKLFKZLOOH[SRQHQWLDOO\LQFUHDVHSURMHFWJHQHUDWHG 907

$Q(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGZLWKDSURMHFWVSHFLILF907DQDO\VLVWK DWLQFOXGHVDTXDQWLILHG907 DQDO\VLVZLWKDOOWUXFNWUDLOHUDQGGHOLYHU\YDQDFWLYLW\WRDG HTXDWHO\DQGDFFXUDWHO\DQDO\]HWKH SRWHQWLDOO\VLJQLILFDQWSURMHFWWUDQVSRUWDWLRQLPSDFWV,QFOXGL QJWUXFNWUDLOHUDQGGHOLYHU\YDQ 907IRUDQDO\VLVRILQGXVWULDOSURMHFWVLVYLWDODVWKHVHWULSV DUHXQDEOHWREHGLYHUWHGWRRWKHU PRGHVRIWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ
ZDONLQJELNLQJSXEOLFWUDQVLWHWF

7KH01'KDVQRWDGHTXDWHO\DQDO\]HGWKHSURMHFW¶VSRWHQWLDOWRVXEVWDQWLDOO\LQFUHDVHKD]DUGVGXH WRDJHRPHWULFGHVLJQIHDWXUH
HJVKDUSFXUYHVRUGDQJHURXVLQWHUVHFWLRQV
RULQFRPSDWLEOHXVHV

RUWKHSURMHFW¶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¶VUHTXLUHPHQWIRU PHDQLQJIXOGLVFORVXUHDQGDGHTXDWHLQIRUPDWLRQDOGRFXPHQWV$Q (,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGIRUWKH

:5&2*6%,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3DWKZD\'RFXPHQW3DFNDJHKWWSV ZZZIHKUDQGSHHUVFRPZS
FRQWHQWXSORDGV
:5&2*6%'RFXPHQW3DFNDJHSGI
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 468
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH
SURSRVHGSURMHFWZLWKWKLVDQDO\VLVLQRUGHUWRSURYLGHDQDGHT XDWHDQGDFFXUDWHHQYLURQPHQWDO DQDO\VLV

21.0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
$Q(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGWRLQFOXGHDFXPXODWLYHDQDO\VLVGLVFXV VLRQKHUHWRGHPRQVWUDWHWKH LPSDFWRIWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWLQDFXPXODWLYHVHWWLQJ)RUH [DPSOH6&$*¶V&RQQHFW6R&DO 'HPRJUDSKLFVDQG*URZWK)RUHFDVWQRWHVWKDWWKH&LW\ZLOODGG MREVEHWZHHQ
2WKHUUHFHQWLQGXVWULDOSURMHFWVVXFKDV2OG%XVLQHVV3DUN HPSOR\HHV
&RPSDVV'DQEH
&HQWHUSRLQWH:DUHKRXVH
HPSOR\HHV
DQG:RUOG/RJLVWLFV&HQ WHU
GLUHFWMREVSOXV
LQGLUHFWLQGXFHGMREVLQWKH&RXQW\

MREVLQGXFHGZ LWKLQ&LW\
WRWDOMREVLQFLW\

FRPELQHGZLWKWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOFXPXODWLYHO\JHQHUDWH HPSOR\HHVZKLFK
LVRIWKH&LW\¶VHPSOR\PHQWJURZWKIRUHFDVWRYHU
\HDUVDFFRXQWHGIRUE\RQO\IRXUUHFHQW
LQGXVWULDOSURMHFWV7KLVQXPEHULQFUHDVHVH[SRQHQWLDOO\ZKHQWKH&LW\VFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQW DFWLYLW\LVDGGHGWRWKHFDOFXODWLRQ$Q(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGW RLQFOXGHWKLVLQIRUPDWLRQIRU DQDO\VLVDQGDOVRLQFOXGHDFXPXODWLYHGHYHORSPHQWDQDO\VLVRISURMHFWVDSSURYHGVLQFHDQG SURMHFWV³LQWKHSLSHOLQH´WRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW H[FHHGVWKH*HQHUDO3ODQJURZWK HVWLPDWHVDQGRU6&$*¶VJURZWKIRUHFDVWVIRUFXPXODWLYHDQDO\VLV)XUWKHUWKHSURMHFWKDVQRW GHPRQVWUDWHGFRPSOLDQFHZLWK0XQLFLSDO&RGH6HFWLRQ
DQGWKH0$5%,3$$/8&3
DQGWKLVLQIRUPDWLRQLVQRWLQFOXGHGIRUDQDO\VLVKHUHHLWKHU
Conclusion
)RUWKHIRUHJRLQJUHDVRQV*6(-$EHOLHYHVWKH01'LVIODZHGDQGDQ(,5PXVWEHSUHSDUHGIRU WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWDQGFLUFXODWHGIRUSXEOLFUHYLHZ*ROGHQ 6WDWH(QYLURQPHQWDO-XVWLFH $OOLDQFHUHTXHVWVWREHDGGHGWRWKHSXEOLFLQWHUHVWOLVWUHJDU GLQJDQ\VXEVHTXHQWHQYLURQPHQWDO GRFXPHQWVSXEOLFQRWLFHVSXEOLFKHDULQJVDQGQRWLFHVRIGHWHUPLQDWLRQIRUWKLVSURMHFW6HQGDOO FRPPXQLFDWLRQVWR*ROGHQ6WDWH (QYLURQPHQWDO-XVWLFH$OOLDQFH3 2%R[ &RURQD&$

6LQFHUHO\

Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 469
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3DJH

Attachment: SWAPE Analysis
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 470
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
February 27, 2023
Gary Ho
Blum Collins LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on t he Cottonwood and Edgemont Project (SCH No. 2023020234) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the February 2023 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the Cottonwood and Edgemont Project (“Project”) located in the City of Moreno Valley (“City”). The Project proposes to construct 99,360-square-feet (“SF”) of industrial space, 4,000-SF of office space, and 130 parking spaces on the 6.88-acre site.

Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The IS/MND’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0 (p. 39). 1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental

1 “CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 471
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 2 Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are calculated, and “output files” are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project’s air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.

When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality Impact Analysis (“AQIA”) and the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (“GHG Analysis”) as Appendix A1 and Appendix G to the IS/MND, respectively, we found that several model inputs are not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the Project’s construction and operational emissions may be underestimated.

An updated EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural Coating Emission Factors Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction – Unmitigated)” model includes reductions to the default architectural coating emission factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix A1, pp. 123, 149; Appendix G, pp. 76).

As demonstrated above, the nonresidential exterior and interior architectural coating emission factors are reduced from the default values of 100- to 50-grams per liter (“g/L”). As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 2 According to the “User
Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Rule 1113” (Appendix A1, pp. 123, 149; Appendix G, pp. 76).

Furthermore, regarding the rules and regulations that would apply to the proposed project, the AQIA states:
“SCAQMD RULE 1113 This rule serves to limit the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects […] Although the Project would comply with the above regulatory requirements, it should be noted that emission reductions associated with Rules 401, 402, 1301, and 2305 cannot be quantified in the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) and are therefore not reflected in the emissions presented herein. Conversely, Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (2) and Rule 1113 2 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 472
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 3 (Architectural Coatings) (3) can be modeled in CalEEMod. As such, credit for Rule 403 and Rule 1113 have been taken in the analysis.” (p. 2, 3).

However, these reductions remain unsubstantiated, as we cannot verify the accuracy of the revised architectural coating emission factors based on SCAQMD Rule 1113 alone. The SCAQMD Rule 1113 Table of Standards provides the required VOC limits (grams of VOC per liter of coating) for 57 different coating categories.3 The VOC limits for each coating varies from a minimum value of 50 g/L to a maximum value of 730 g/L. As such, we cannot verify that SCAQMD Rule 1113 substantiates reductions to the default coating values without more information regarding what category of coating will be used. As the IS/MND fails to explicitly require the use of a specific type of coating which would adhere to a specific VOC limit, we are unable to verify the model’s revised architectural coating emission factors.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the architectural coating emission factors to calculate the Project’s reactive organic gas/volatile organic compound (“ROG”/“VOC”) emissions.
4 By including unsubstantiated reductions to the default architectural coating emission factors, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related ROG/VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction – Unmitigated)” model includes several changes to the default individual construction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix A1, pp. 123, 149; Appendix G, pp. 76).

As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix A2, pp. 129, 155; Appendix G, pp. 82, 83).
3 SCAQMD Rule 1113 Advisory Notice.” SCAQMD, February 2016, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf?sfvrsn=24, p. 1113-14, Table of Standards 1. 4 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 35, 40.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 473
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 4 As demonstrated above, the site preparation phase is increased by 100%, from the default value of 10 to 20 days; the grading phase is increased by 15%, from the default value of 20 to 23 days; the building construction phase is decreased by 43%, from the default value of 230 to 130 days; and the paving and architectural coating phases are each decreased by 50%, from their default values of 20 to 10 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.5 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Construction schedule based on information provided by the Project Applicant” (Appendix A1, pp. 122, 148; Appendix G, pp. 75).

Additionally, regarding the Project’s anticipated construction schedule, the IS/MND states:
“Based on information provided by the Project Applicant, the Project is anticipated to be constructed over a period of approximately 193 workdays (8 months)” (p. 6).

Furthermore, the IS/MND provides the following table (see excerpt below) (p. 6).

However, the changes to the induvial construction phase lengths remain unsubstantiated. While the IS/MND states that the total length of Project construction would be 8 months, the IS/MND fails to provide an adequate source for the induvial construction phase lengths. As presented in Table 1, the source for the above-mentioned construction schedule is the CalEEMod output files themselves (p. 6).

This is incorrect, as the Project documents should substantiate the changes included in the CalEEMod 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 474
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 5 model, not vice versa.6 As the IS/MND fails to provide an adequate source for the revised construction phase lengths, we cannot verify the changes. Until a proper source is provided, the model should have included proportionately altered individual phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 8 months.7
These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as the construction emissions are improperly spread out over a longer period of time for some phases, but not for others. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).8

By disproportionately altering and extending some of the individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the model assumes there are a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the prolonged phases. As a result, there will be less construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. Therefore, the model may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with some phases of construction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction- Unmitigated)” model includes several changes to the off-road construction equipment unit amounts (see excerpt below) (Appendix A1, pp. 124, 150; Appendix G, pp. 77).

6 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13, 14.
7 See Attachment A for proportionally altered construction schedule. 8 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 32.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 475
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 6 As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.9 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Equipment based on information provided by the Project Applicant” (Appendix A1, pp. 122, 148; Appendix G, pp. 75).

Furthermore, the IS/MND provides the following construction scenario assumptions (see excerpt below) (p. 7, Table 2):
9 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 2, 9 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 476
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 7 However, the revisions to the construction off-road equipment unit amounts remain unsupported. As presented in Table 2, the source for the construction equipment unit amounts is the CalEEMod output files themselves. This is incorrect, as the Project documents should substantiate the changes included in the CalEEMod model, not vice versa.10 As the IS/MND fails to provide an adequate source for the off- road construction equipment unit amounts, we cannot verify the changes.

These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the off-road equipment unit amounts to calculate the emissions associated with off-road construction equipment.11 By including unsubstantiated changes to the default off-road construction equipment unit amounts, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Underestimated Number of Operational Saturday and Sunday Vehicle Trips According to the Trip Generation Assessment (“TA”) provided as Appendix K1 to the IS/MND, the Project is expected to generate 438 daily vehicle trips for the General Light Industrial land use and 24 daily vehicle trips for the High-Cube Cold Storage land use (see excerpt below) (p. 3, Table 2).

As such, the Project’s models should have included trip rates that reflect the estimated number of average daily vehicle trips. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (General Light Industrial Operations)” model includes only 37.05 Saturday and 14.38 Sunday vehicle trips. Furthermore, the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (High-Cube Cold Storage Operations)” model includes only 2.03 Saturday and 0.81 Sunday vehicle trips (see excerpts below) (Appendix A1, pp. 185, 201, 218, 232; Appendix G, pp. 119, 144). 10 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13, 14.
11 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 32 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 477
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 8 General Light Industrial Operations
High-Cube Cold Storage
As demonstrated above, the “Cotton and Edgemont (General Light Industrial Operations)” Saturday and Sunday vehicle trips are underestimated by approximately 401- and 423-trips, respectively.12, 13 Similarly, the “Cotton and Edgemont (High-Cube Cold Storage Operations )” Saturday and Sunday vehicle trips are underestimated by approximately 22- and 23-trips, respectively. 14, 15 As such, the trip rates inputted into the model are underestimated and inconsistent with the information provided by the TA.

These inconsistencies present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the operational vehicle trip rates to calculate the emissions associated with the operational on-road vehicles.16 By including underestimated operational daily vehicle trips, the model underestimates the Project’s mobile-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Incorrect Operational Off-Road Equipment Input Parameters Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Cottonwood & Edgemont (General Light Industrial Operations)” model includes several changes to the default operational off-road equipment input parameters (see excerpt below) (Appendix A1, pp. 178, 194; Appendix G, pp. 112). 12 Calculated: 438.01 proposed daily trips – 37.05 modeled Saturday trips = 400.96 underestimated Saturday trips. 13 Calculated: 438.01 proposed daily trips – 14.82 modeled Sunday trips = 423.19 underestimated Sunday trips. 14 Calculated: 24 proposed daily trips – 2.03 modeled Saturday trips = 21.97 underestimated Saturday trips. 15 Calculated: 24 proposed daily trips – 0.81 modeled Sunday trips = 23.19 underestimated Sunday trips. 16 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 36.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 478
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 9 As a result, the model includes 2 CNG tractors that would each operate for 4 hours per day (see excerpt below) (Appendix A1, pp. 190, 206; Appendix G, pp. 131).

As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 17 According to the “User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for the inclusion of operational off-road equipment is:
“Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014)” (Appendix A1, pp. 176, 192; Appendix G, pp. 110).

However, the revisions the default operational off-road equipment values are incorrect for three reasons.

First, review of the SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results demonstrates that the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) fails to mention or substantiate that operation of off-road equipment is limited to only 4 hours a day. 18 As such, in order to conduct the most conservative analysis, the model should have included the tractors as being operated for 8 hours per day, as assumed by the default CalEEMod values.

Second, according to the IS/MND, the Project is expected to require forklifts as part of the operation fleet:
“The Project is expected to use outdoor cargo handling equipment (e.g., yard trucks, hostlers, yard goats, pallet jacks, forklifts) that is only powered by non-diesel engines (e.g. gasoline, natural gas, electric)” (p. 6, 7).
17 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14. 18 “SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results.” SCAQMD, June 2014, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip- rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/business-survey-summary.pdf.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 479
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 10 As the SCAQMD reported an average of 0.12 forklifts/pallet jacks per 1,000-SF of warehouse building area, the model should have included approximately 12 operational forklifts in addition to the operational tractors.19,20
Third, the IS/MND fails to include the use of Compressed Natural Gas (“CNG”) fuel as a formal mitigation measure. This is incorrect, as according to the Association of Environmental Professionals’ (“AEP”) CEQA Portal Topic Paper on Mitigation Measures:
“While not ‘mitigation’, a good practice is to include those project design feature(s) that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact.”21
As demonstrated above, design features that are not formally included as mitigation measures may be eliminated from the Project’s design altogether. Thus, as CNG fuel is not formally included as a mitigation measure in the IS/MND, we cannot guarantee that the use of CNG fuel would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site.

This incorrect and unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as CalEEMod uses operational off-road equipment to calculate the emissions associated with the Project’s area-source operational emissions. 22 By including unsubstantiated input parameters for the Project’s operational off-road equipment, failing to include any operational forklifts, and failing to include the use of CNG fuel as a formal mitigation measure, the model may underestimate the Project’s area-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to more accurately estimate the Project’s construction-related emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND. In our updated model, we omitted the unsubstantiated reductions to the architectural coating emission factors and construction off-road equipment units, and proportionately altered the individual construction phase lengths to match the total length of 8 months.23

19 “SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results.” SCAQMD, June 2014, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip- rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/business-survey-summary.pdf, p. 9. 20 Calculated: (99,630-SF / 1,000-SF) * 0.12 = 11.96 forklifts. 21 “CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures.” AEP, February 2020, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 6. 22 “CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 42. 23 See Attachment B for updated air modeling.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 480
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 11 Our updated analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions would exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) threshold of 75-pounds per day (“lbs/day”), as referenced by the AQIA (p. 40, Table 3) (see table below).24 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction VOC
(lbs/day)
AQIA 52.43
SWAPE 89.61
% Increase 71%
SCAQMD Threshold 75
Exceeds? Yes
As you can see in the table above, the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 71% and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. Thus, our updated model demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed in the IS/MND. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment.

Disproportionate Health Risk Impacts of Warehouses on Surrounding Communities Upon review of the IS/MND and associated documents, we have determined that the development of the proposed Project would result in disproportionate health risk impacts on community members living, working, and going to school within the immediate area of the Project site. According to SCAQMD:
“Those living within a half mile of warehouses are more likely to include communities of color, have health impacts such as higher rates of asthma and heart attacks, and a greater environmental burden.”
25 In particular, the SCAQMD found that more than 2.4 million people live within a half mile radius of at least one warehouse, and that those areas not only experience increased rates of asthma and heart attacks, but are also disproportionately Black and Latino communities below the poverty line.26 Another study similarly indicates that “neighborhoods with lower household income levels and higher percentages of minorities are expected to have higher probabilities of containing warehousing

24 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 25 “South Coast AQMD Governing Board Adopts Warehouse Indirect Source Rule.” SCAQMD, May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/news-archive/2021/board-adopts-waisr-may7-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=9. 26 “Southern California warehouse boom a huge source of pollution. Regulators are fighting back.” Los Angeles Times, May 2021, available at: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-05/air-quality-officials-target- warehouses-bid-to-curb-health-damaging-truck-pollution.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 481
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 12 facilities.”27 Additionally, a report authored by the Inland Empire-based People’s Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands states:
“As the warehouse and logistics industry continues to grow and net exponential profits at record rates, more warehouse projects are being approved and constructed in low-income communities of color and serving as a massive source of pollution by attracting thousands of polluting truck trips daily. Diesel trucks emit dangerous levels of nitrogen oxide and particulate matter that cause devastating health impacts including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, and premature death. As a result, physicians consider these pollution- burdened areas ‘diesel death zones.’”28
It is evident that the continued development of industrial warehouses within these communities poses a significant environmental justice challenge. However, the acceleration of warehouse development is only increasing despite the consequences on public health.

Moreno Valley, the setting of the proposed Project, bears a disproportionately high pollution burden compared to the rest of California. When using CalEnviroScreen 4.0, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s (“CalEPA”) screening tool that ranks each census tract in the State for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, we found that the Project’s census tract is in the 99th percentile of most polluted census tracts in the State (see excerpt below).29

27 “Location of warehouses and environmental justice: Evidence from four metros in California.” Metro Freight Center of Excellence, January 2018, available at:
https://www.metrans.org/assets/research/MF%201.1g_Location%20of%20warehouses%20and%20environmental %20justice_Final%20Report_021618.pdf, p. 21.
28 “Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry’s impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California.” People’s Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse_research_report_4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4. 29 “CalEnviroScreen 4.0.” California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), October 2021, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 482
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 13 Additionally, according to CalEnviroScreen’s SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Map, the Project site is located in a designated disadvantaged community (see excerpt below).30 30 “SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities (2022 Update).” California Environmental Protection Agency, available at:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1c21c53da8de48f1b946f3402fbae55c/page/SB-535-Disadvantaged- Communities/
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 483
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 14 SB 535 provides funding for development projects that provide a benefit to disadvantaged communities.

CalEPA has been given the responsibility for identifying those communities based on “geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria.”31 Therefore, as the Project site is located in a designated disadvantaged community, and Project’s census tract already exhibits a high cancer risk, development of the proposed Project would disproportionately contribute to and exacerbate the health conditions of nearby residents.

In April 2022, the American Lung Association ranked Riverside County as the second worst for ozone pollution in the nation.32 This year, the County continues to face significant ozone pollution, as it has seen the second highest recorded Air Quality Index (“AQI”) values for ground-level ozone in California.33 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) indicates that ozone, the main ingredient in “smog,” can cause several health problems, which includes aggravating lung diseases and increasing the frequency of asthma attacks. The U.S. EPA states:
“Children are at greatest risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active outdoors when ozone levels are high, which increases their exposure. Children are also more likely than adults to have asthma.” 34 Furthermore, regarding the increased sensitivity of early-life exposures to inhaled pollutants, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) states:
“Children are often at greater risk from inhaled pollutants, due to the following reasons:
x Children have unique activity patterns and behavior. For example, they crawl and play on the ground, amidst dirt and dust that may carry a wide variety of toxicants. They often put their hands, toys, and other items into their mouths, ingesting harmful substances. Compared to adults, children typically spend more time outdoors and are more physically active. Time outdoors coupled with faster breathing during exercise increases children’s relative exposure to air pollution. x Children are physiologically unique. Relative to body size, children eat, breathe, and drink more than adults, and their natural biological defenses are less developed. The protective barrier surrounding the brain is not fully developed, and children’s nasal

31 “Final Designation of Disadvantaged Communities).” California Environmental Protection Agency, available at:
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://calepa.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/sites/6/2022/05/Updated-Disadvantaged-Communities-Designation-DAC-May-2022-Eng.a.hp_-

1.pdf?emrc=e05e10
32 “State of the Air 2022.” American Lung Association, April 2022, available at:
https://www.lung.org/research/sota/key-findings/most-polluted-places. 33 “High Ozone Days.” American Lung Association, 2022, available at:
https://www.lung.org/research/sota/city-rankings/states/california. 34 “Health Effects of Ozone Pollution.” U.S. EPA, May 2021, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone- pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 484
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 15 passages aren’t as effective at filtering out pollutants. Developing lungs, immune, and metabolic systems are also at risk.
x Children are particularly susceptible during development. Environmental exposures during fetal development, the first few years of life, and puberty have the greatest potential to influence later growth and development.”35 A Stanford-led study also reveals that children exposed to high levels of air pollution are more susceptible to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in adulthood.36 Thus, given children’s higher propensity to succumb to the negative health impacts of air pollutants, and as warehouses release more smog-forming pollution than any other sector, it is necessary to evaluate the specific health risk that warehouses pose to children in the nearby community.

According to the above-mentioned study by the People’s Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands, there are 640 schools in the South Coast Air Basin that are located within half a mile of a large warehouse, most of them in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. 37 Review of Google
Earth demonstrates that there is an elementary school approximately half of a mile from the Project site:
35 “Children and Air Pollution.” California Air Resources Board (CARB), available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/children-and-air-pollution. 36 “Air pollution puts children at higher risk of disease in adulthood, according to Stanford researchers and others.” Stanford, February 2021, available at: https://news.stanford.edu/2021/02/22/air-pollution-impacts-childrens- health/.
37 “Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry’s impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California.” People’s Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse_research_report_4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 485
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 16 As demonstrated, Edgemont Elementary School is located approximately 0.55 miles, or 2,904 feet, from the Project site. Therefore, this Project poses a significant threat because, as outlined above, children are a vulnerable population that are more susceptible to the damaging side effects of air pollution. As such, the Project would have detrimental short-term and long-term health impacts on local children if approved.

An EIR should be prepared to evaluate the disproportionate impacts of the proposed warehouse on the community adjacent to the Project, including an analysis of the impact on children and people of color who live and attend school in the surrounding area. Finally, in order to evaluate the cumulative air quality impact from the several warehouse projects proposed or built in a one-mile radius of the Project site, the EIR should prepare a cumulative health risk assessment (“HRA”) to quantify the adverse health outcome from the effects of exposure to multiple warehouses in the immediate area in conjunction with the poor ambient air quality in the Project’s census tract.

Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND conducts a health risk analysis (“HRA”) evaluating impacts from exposure to diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions during Project construction and operation, as detailed in the Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (“HRA Report”), provided as Appendix A2 to the IS/MND.

Specifically, the HRA Report estimates that the maximum cancer risk posed to nearby, existing residential sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation would be 8.88 in one million (p. 5, Table ES-3).

However, the IS/MND’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.

First, the IS/MND’s construction HRA is incorrect, as it relies upon emissions estimates from a flawed air model, as previously discussed. Specifically, the HRA Report states:
“The emissions calculations for the construction HRA component are based on an assumed mix of construction equipment and hauling activity as presented in the Cottonwood & Edgemont F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 486
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 17 Warehouse Air Quality Impact Analysis (“technical study”) prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. (5)” (p. 11).

As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the AQIA as Appendix A1 to the IS/MND, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the HRA utilizes an underestimated DPM concentration to calculate the health risk associated with Project construction. As such, the HRA Report’s construction cancer risk should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Second, the IS/MND’s HRA may fail to include Age Sensitivity Factors (“ASF”). Regarding ASFs, OEHHA guidance states:
“Studies have shown that young animals are more sensitive than adult animals to exposure to many carcinogens (OEHHA, 2009). Therefore, OEHHA developed age sensitivity factors (ASFs) to take into account the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure (Table

8.3). These factors were developed and described in detail in OEHHA (2009). In the absence of chemical-specific data, OEHHA recommends a default ASF of 10 for the third trimester to age 2 years, and an ASF of 3 for ages 2 through 15 years to account for potential increased sensitivity to carcinogens during childhood.”
Thus, the HRA Report’s equation to produce carcinogenic risk estimates, as shown below, is incorrect and underestimated (p. 22).

Instead, the IS/MND should have used the following equation that includes ASFs:

Thus, by potentially failing to include ASF values in the carcinogenic risk estimate equation, the IS/MND’s HRA may underestimate the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation.

Third, the IS/MND’s HRA underestimates the Fraction of Time At Home (“FAH”) values. Specifically, for calculating construction-related cancer risks, the HRA relies on an FAH value 0.93 for infant (age 0 to 2) receptors. For calculating operational cancer risks, the HRA relies on an FAH value of 0.85 for third trimester (age -0.25 to 0) and infant receptors, and an FAH value of 0.72 for the child receptors (age 2 to 16) (see excerpt below) (Appendix A2, p. 20-21, Table 2-6, Table 2-7).

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 487
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 18 However, the FAH values used for the third trimester, infant, and childhood receptors are incorrect, as SCAQMD guidance clearly states:
“For Tiers 1, 2, and 3 screening purposes, the FAH is assumed to be 1 for ages third trimester to

16. As a default, children are assumed to attend a daycare or school in close proximity to their home and no discount should be taken for time spent outside of the area affected by the facility’s emissions. People older than age 16 are assumed to spend only 73 percent of their time at home.”
38 Per SCAQMD guidance, the HRA Report should have used an FAH of 1 for the third trimester, infant, and child receptors. Thus, by utilizing incorrect FAH values, the HRA Report underestimates the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation. As a result, the IS/MND’s less-than-significant health risk impact conclusion should not be relied on, and an EIR should be prepared to include an updated HRA relying on correct input parameters.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions of 1,369.19 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”) (p. 58, Table 7). 38 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 488
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 19 As a result, the IS/MND concludes:
“As shown above, the Project will result in approximately 1,369.19 MTCO2e emissions annually, which would not exceed the significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the Project would not generate substantial GHG emissions – either directly or indirectly – that would have a significant impact on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant” (p. 57).

Furthermore, the IS/MND’s analysis relies upon the Project’s consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan (“CAP”) and the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan to conclude that the Project would result in a less-than- significant GHG impact (p. 59). However, the IS/MND’s analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than- significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons. (1) The IS/MND’s quantitative analysis relies upon a flawed air model; (2) The IS/MND’s quantitative analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) The IS/MND’s unsubstantiated air model indic ates a potentially significant impact; and (4) The IS/MND fails to consider performance- based standards under CARB’s 2017 scoping plan. 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Qua ntitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,369.19 MTCO2e (p. 58, Table 7). However, the IS/MND quantitative analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod models, provided in the AQIA and the GHG Analysis as Appendix A1 and Appendix G, respectively, to the IS/MND, we found that several of the values inputted into the models are not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the models may underestimate the Project’s emissions, and the IS/MND’s quantitative analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the environment.
2) Incorrect Reliance on an Outd ated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,369.19 MTCO2e, which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (p. 58, Table 7). However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 489
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 20 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.39 Furthermore, AEP guidance states:
“[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.”40
As it is currently February 2023, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the IS/MND’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.41 3) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG emissions, as estimated by the IS/MND, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year.

When applying this threshold, the Project’s incorrect and unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.

As previously stated, the IS/MND estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,369.19 MTCO2e (p. 58, Table 7). According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population (“SP”) is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”42 According to the Traffic Analysis (“TA”), the project would support 130 employees (Table 4-3, p. 42). As the project is not expected to support any residential land uses, we estimate an SP of 130 people. When dividing the Project’s net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the IS/MND, by an SP of 130 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 10.5 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).43

39 “Health & Safety Code 38550.” California State Legislature, January 2007, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=38550. 40 “Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 39. 41 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 42 “CEQA & Climate Change.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008, available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf, p. 71-72. 43 Calculated: (1,369.19 MT CO2e/year) / (130 service population) = (10.5 MT CO2e/SP/year).

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 490
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 21 IS/MND Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 1,369.19
Service Population 130
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 10.5
SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the IS/MND. As a result, the IS/MND’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. An EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-than- significant levels.
4) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan As previously discussed, the IS/MND concludes that the Project would be consistent with CARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan (p. 59). However, this is incorrect, as the IS/MND fails to consider the performance-based measures proposed by CARB.
i. Passenger & Light Duty VMT Per Capita Benchmarks per SB 375 In reaching the State’s long-term GHG emission reduction goals, CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly cites to SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated under the implementation of Sustainable Community Strategies.44 CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and light-duty vehicles at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a “baseline scenario” that includes “current projections of VMT included in the existing Regional Transportation Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State’s 18 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) pursuant to SB 375 as of 2015.”45 By dividing the projected daily VMT by the population, we calculated the daily VMT per capita for each year at the state and county level for 2010 (baseline year), 2023 (Project operational year), and 2030 (target years under SB 32) (see table below).

44 “California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.” CARB, November 2017, available at:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf, p. 25, 98, 101-103. 45 “Supporting Calculations for 2017 Scoping Plan-Identified VMT Reductions,” California Air Resources Board (CARB), January 2019, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/carb-2017-scoping-plan- identified-vmt-reductions-and-relationship-state-climate; see also:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-01/sp_mss_vmt_calculations_jan19_0.xlsx.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 491
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 22 2017 Scoping Plan Daily VMT Per Capita
Riverside County State Year Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita 2010 2,196,083 41,086,173 18.71 37,335,085 836,463,980.46 22.40 2023 2,613,313 48,625,180 18.61 41,659,526 924,184,228.61 22.18 2030 2,857,496 50,704,073 17.74 43,939,250 957,178,153.19 21.78 As the IS/MND fails to evaluate the Project’s consistency with the performance-based daily VMT per capita projections from CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan, the IS/MND’s claim that the proposed Project would be consistent with the Scoping Plan is unsupported.

Furthermore, as of November 16, 2022, CARB has released an updated scoping plan for achieving carbon neutrality. However, the IS/MND fails to discuss the updated CARB 2022 Scoping plan whatsoever. An EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. As such, in an effort to reduce the Project’s emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Feasible mitigation measures can be found in the California Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.46 Therefore, to reduce the Project’s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made:
x Requiring off-road construction equipment to be hybrid electric-diesel or zero emission, where available, and all diesel-fueled off-road construction equipment to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities.
x Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10 hours per day.
x Using electric-powered hand tools, forklifts, and pressure washers, and providing electrical hook ups to the power grid rather than use of diesel-fueled generators to supply their power. x Designating an area in the construction site where electric-powered construction vehicles and equipment can charge.
x Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area.

46 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 – 10.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 492
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 23 x Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for particulates or ozone for the project area.
x Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than three minutes. x Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
x Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. x Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
x Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
x Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
x Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles engaged in drayage to or from the project site to be zero- emission beginning in 2030.
x Requiring all on-site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be zero-emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided. x Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
x Forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
x Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.
x Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers.
x Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. x Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
x Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. x Unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space, constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at loading docks.
x Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 493
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 24 x Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance)
x Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations.
x Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
x Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
x Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. x Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. x Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single- occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
x Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. x Designing to LEED green building certification standards. x Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. x Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. x Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
x Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. x Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
x Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 494
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 25 Furthermore, as it is policy of the State that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045, we emphasize the applicability of incorporating solar power system into the Project design. Until the feasibility of incorporating on-site renewable energy production is considered, the Project should not be approved.

An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Proportionately Altered Construction Schedule Attachment B: Updated CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul Rosenfeld CV
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 495
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Phase
Default Phase
Length
Construction
Duration %
Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Site Preparation 10 419 0.0239 240 6
Grading 20 419 0.0477 240 11
Construction 230 419 0.5489 240 132
Paving 20 419 0.0477 240 11
Architectural Coating 20 419 0.0477 240 11
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 3/1/2023 2/1/2023
End Date 4/23/2024 9/29/2023
Total Days 419 240
Construction Schedule Calculations
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚF.1.aa
Packet Pg. 496
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated)
Riverside-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts" Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts" Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts" Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts" Off-road Equipment - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Off-Road Equipment Unit Amounts"

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Heavy Industry 89.67 1000sqft 2.06 89,667.00 0
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 9.96 1000sqft 0.23 9,963.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 176.40 1000sqft 4.05 176,404.00 0 Parking Lot 130.00 Space 0.81 35,264.00 0
City Park 0.79 Acre 0.79 34,588.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.4 28

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2023Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 1 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 497
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Trips and VMT - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Grading - Left as default
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Solid Waste - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 133.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.93 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.37 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.02 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 36.52 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 17.13 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 48.51 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 1.97 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.95 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 15.20 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 3.22 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 89,670.00 89,667.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,960.00 9,963.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 176,400.00 176,404.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 2 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 498
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 52,000.00 35,264.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,412.40 34,588.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.17 0.81
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.07 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 111.19 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 9.36 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 7.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 57.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 13.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 3 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 499
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 20,736,187.50 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,303,250.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 941,270.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 4 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 500
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.6624 1.3239 1.6633 3.6000e-
003

0.2279 0.0595 0.2873 0.0848 0.0557 0.1405 0.0000 320.9260 320.9260 0.0512 8.7400e- 003
324.8083
Maximum 0.6624 1.3239 1.6633 3.6000e-
003

0.2279 0.0595 0.2873 0.0848 0.0557 0.1405 0.0000 320.9260 320.9260 0.0512 8.7400e- 003
324.8083
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.6624 1.3239 1.6633 3.6000e-
003

0.2279 0.0595 0.2873 0.0848 0.0557 0.1405 0.0000 320.9257 320.9257 0.0512 8.7400e- 003
324.8081
Maximum 0.6624 1.3239 1.6633 3.6000e-
003

0.2279 0.0595 0.2873 0.0848 0.0557 0.1405 0.0000 320.9257 320.9257 0.0512 8.7400e- 003
324.8081
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 5 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 501
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 2-1-2023 4-30-2023 0.4405 0.4405
2 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 0.5947 0.5947
3 8-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.3884 0.3884
Highest 0.5947 0.5947

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 6 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 502
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 7 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 503
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 4 Paving Paving 9/28/2023 10/12/2023 5 11
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/13/2023 10/27/2023 5 11 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 149,445; Non-Residential Outdoor: 49,815; Striped Parking Area: 12,700 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 4.86
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 8 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 504
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0590 0.0000 0.0590 0.0303 0.0000 0.0303 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.9800e-
003

0.0826 0.0547 1.1000e-
004

3.8000e-
003

3.4900e-
003

0.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e-
003

0.0000 10.1164
Total 7.9800e-
003

0.0826 0.0547 1.1000e-
004

0.0590 3.8000e-
003

0.0628 0.0303 3.4900e-
003

0.0338 0.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e-
003

0.0000 10.1164
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 5.00 6.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 18.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 145.00 38.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 13.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 29.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 9 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 505
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3029 0.3029 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.3163
Worker 5.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.7000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1270 0.1270 0.0000 0.0000 0.1280
Total 7.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4298 0.4298 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.4443
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0590 0.0000 0.0590 0.0303 0.0000 0.0303 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.9800e-
003

0.0826 0.0547 1.1000e-
004

3.8000e-
003

3.4900e-
003

0.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e-
003

0.0000 10.1163
Total 7.9800e-
003

0.0826 0.0547 1.1000e-
004

0.0590 3.8000e-
003

0.0628 0.0303 3.4900e-
003

0.0338 0.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e-
003

0.0000 10.1163
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 10 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 506
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3029 0.3029 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.3163
Worker 5.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.7000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1270 0.1270 0.0000 0.0000 0.1280
Total 7.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4298 0.4298 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.4443
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0425 0.0000 0.0425 0.0206 0.0000 0.0206 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0103 0.1076 0.0885 1.8000e-
004

4.6500e-
003

4.2800e-
003

0.0000 15.6364 15.6364 5.0600e-
003

0.0000 15.7628
Total 0.0103 0.1076 0.0885 1.8000e-
004

0.0425 4.6500e-
003

0.0472 0.0206 4.2800e-
003

0.0248 0.0000 15.6364 15.6364 5.0600e-
003

0.0000 15.7628
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 11 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 507
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7067 0.7067 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.7380
Worker 3.5000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1900e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.9140 0.9140 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9217
Total 4.0000e-
004

1.7000e-
003

3.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.4600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.4700e-
003

4.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.6207 1.6207 3.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.6597
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0425 0.0000 0.0425 0.0206 0.0000 0.0206 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0103 0.1076 0.0885 1.8000e-
004

4.6500e-
003

4.2800e-
003

0.0000 15.6364 15.6364 5.0600e-
003

0.0000 15.7628
Total 0.0103 0.1076 0.0885 1.8000e-
004

0.0425 4.6500e-
003

0.0472 0.0206 4.2800e-
003

0.0248 0.0000 15.6364 15.6364 5.0600e-
003

0.0000 15.7628
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 12 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 508
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

1.4400e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7067 0.7067 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.7380
Worker 3.5000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1900e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 0.9140 0.9140 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9217
Total 4.0000e-
004

1.7000e-
003

3.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.4600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.4700e-
003

4.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 1.6207 1.6207 3.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
004

1.6597
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1046 0.9566 1.0802 1.7900e-
003

0.0465 0.0465 0.0438 0.0438 0.0000 154.1502 154.1502 0.0367 0.0000 155.0669 Total 0.1046 0.9566 1.0802 1.7900e-
003

0.0465 0.0465 0.0438 0.0438 0.0000 154.1502 154.1502 0.0367 0.0000 155.0669 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 13 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 509
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0866 0.0345 4.4000e-
004

0.0160 7.2000e-
004

0.0167 4.6100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

5.2900e-
003

0.0000 42.5169 42.5169 4.3000e-
004

6.2900e-
003

44.4011
Worker 0.0313 0.0232 0.3027 8.8000e-
004

0.1060 5.1000e-
004

0.1065 0.0281 4.7000e-
004

0.0286 0.0000 81.6075 81.6075 2.0100e-
003

2.1400e-
003

82.2956
Total 0.0340 0.1098 0.3372 1.3200e-
003

0.1219 1.2300e-
003

0.1232 0.0328 1.1600e-
003

0.0339 0.0000 124.1244 124.1244 2.4400e-
003

8.4300e-
003
126.6967
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1046 0.9566 1.0802 1.7900e-
003

0.0465 0.0465 0.0438 0.0438 0.0000 154.1500 154.1500 0.0367 0.0000 155.0667 Total 0.1046 0.9566 1.0802 1.7900e-
003

0.0465 0.0465 0.0438 0.0438 0.0000 154.1500 154.1500 0.0367 0.0000 155.0667 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 14 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 510
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0866 0.0345 4.4000e-
004

0.0160 7.2000e-
004

0.0167 4.6100e-
003

6.9000e-
004

5.2900e-
003

0.0000 42.5169 42.5169 4.3000e-
004

6.2900e-
003

44.4011
Worker 0.0313 0.0232 0.3027 8.8000e-
004

0.1060 5.1000e-
004

0.1065 0.0281 4.7000e-
004

0.0286 0.0000 81.6075 81.6075 2.0100e-
003

2.1400e-
003

82.2956
Total 0.0340 0.1098 0.3372 1.3200e-
003

0.1219 1.2300e-
003

0.1232 0.0328 1.1600e-
003

0.0339 0.0000 124.1244 124.1244 2.4400e-
003

8.4300e-
003
126.6967
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.6800e-
003

0.0561 0.0802 1.3000e-
004

2.8100e-
003

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 11.0148 11.0148 3.5600e-
003

0.0000 11.1038
Paving 6.3700e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0121 0.0561 0.0802 1.3000e-
004

2.8100e-
003

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 11.0148 11.0148 3.5600e-
003

0.0000 11.1038
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 15 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 511
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2776 0.2776 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.2899
Worker 2.3000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

0.0000 7.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6051 0.6051 1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6102
Total 2.5000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

2.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 9.0000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 2.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.8827 0.8827 1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.9002
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.6800e-
003

0.0561 0.0802 1.3000e-
004

2.8100e-
003

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 11.0148 11.0148 3.5600e-
003

0.0000 11.1038
Paving 6.3700e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0121 0.0561 0.0802 1.3000e-
004

2.8100e-
003

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 11.0148 11.0148 3.5600e-
003

0.0000 11.1038
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 16 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 512
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

5.7000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2776 0.2776 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.2899
Worker 2.3000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

0.0000 7.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6051 0.6051 1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6102
Total 2.5000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

2.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 9.0000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 2.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.8827 0.8827 1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.9002
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4912 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0500e-
003

7.1700e-
003

9.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4064
Total 0.4923 7.1700e-
003

9.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4064
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 17 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 513
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2776 0.2776 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.2899
Worker 5.2000e-
004

3.8000e-
004

5.0100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7600e-
003

4.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.3499 1.3499 3.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3613
Total 5.4000e-
004

9.5000e-
004

5.2400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8700e-
003

5.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.6275 1.6275 3.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

1.6512
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4912 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0500e-
003

7.1700e-
003

9.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4064
Total 0.4923 7.1700e-
003

9.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4043 1.4043 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4064
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 18 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 514
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2776 0.2776 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.2899
Worker 5.2000e-
004

3.8000e-
004

5.0100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7600e-
003

4.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.3499 1.3499 3.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3613
Total 5.4000e-
004

9.5000e-
004

5.2400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8700e-
003

5.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.6275 1.6275 3.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

1.6512
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 19 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 515
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 20 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 516
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 General Heavy Industry 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Parking Lot 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0 .005468

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 21 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 517
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 22 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 518
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 23 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 519
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 24 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 520
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 25 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 521
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Unmitigated 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0491 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3740 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.8000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Total 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 26 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 522
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0491 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3740 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.8000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Total 0.4236 5.0000e-
005

5.1900e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0101 0.0101 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0108
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 27 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 523
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Heavy
Industry
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 28 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 524
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 29 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 525
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 30 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 526
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 31 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 527
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:44 AMPage 32 of 32 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 528
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated)
Riverside-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.4 28

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2023Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 1 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 529
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Trips and VMT - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Grading - Left as default
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Solid Waste - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 133.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.93 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.37 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.02 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 36.52 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 17.13 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 48.51 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 1.97 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.95 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 15.20 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 3.22 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 89,670.00 89,667.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,960.00 9,963.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 176,400.00 176,404.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 2 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 530
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 52,000.00 35,264.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,412.40 34,588.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.17 0.81
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.07 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 111.19 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 9.36 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 7.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 57.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 13.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 3 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 531
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 20,736,187.50 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,303,250.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 941,270.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 4 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 532
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.6132 27.7315 22.0746 0.0478 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,718.234 1 4,718.234
1 1.1948 0.1381 4,775.581
8 Maximum 89.6132 27.7315 22.0746 0.0478 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,718.234 1 4,718.234
1 1.1948 0.1381 4,775.581
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.6132 27.7315 22.0746 0.0478 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,718.234 1 4,718.234
1 1.1948 0.1381 4,775.581
8 Maximum 89.6132 27.7315 22.0746 0.0478 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,718.234 1 4,718.234
1 1.1948 0.1381 4,775.581
8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 5 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 533
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.0949
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.0949
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 6 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 534
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/1/2023 3/8/2023 5 6 2 Grading Grading 3/9/2023 3/24/2023 5 12
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/25/2023 9/27/2023 5 133 4 Paving Paving 9/28/2023 10/12/2023 5 11
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/13/2023 10/27/2023 5 11 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 149,445; Non-Residential Outdoor: 49,815; Striped Parking Area: 12,700 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 4.86
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 7 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 535
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 5.00 6.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 18.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 145.00 38.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 13.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 29.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 8 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 536
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.7600e-
003

0.1960 0.0807 1.0500e-
003

0.0384 1.7100e-
003

0.0401 0.0111 1.6300e-
003

0.0127 111.1626 111.1626 1.1300e-
003

0.0164 116.0860
Worker 0.0183 0.0113 0.1834 4.9000e-
004

0.0559 2.6000e-
004

0.0562 0.0148 2.4000e-
004

0.0151 50.3102 50.3102 1.1500e-
003

1.1700e-
003

50.6884
Total 0.0250 0.2073 0.2641 1.5400e-
003

0.0943 1.9700e-
003

0.0963 0.0259 1.8700e-
003

0.0278 161.4728 161.4728 2.2800e-
003

0.0176 166.7745
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 9 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 537
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.7600e-
003

0.1960 0.0807 1.0500e-
003

0.0384 1.7100e-
003

0.0401 0.0111 1.6300e-
003

0.0127 111.1626 111.1626 1.1300e-
003

0.0164 116.0860
Worker 0.0183 0.0113 0.1834 4.9000e-
004

0.0559 2.6000e-
004

0.0562 0.0148 2.4000e-
004

0.0151 50.3102 50.3102 1.1500e-
003

1.1700e-
003

50.6884
Total 0.0250 0.2073 0.2641 1.5400e-
003

0.0943 1.9700e-
003

0.0963 0.0259 1.8700e-
003

0.0278 161.4728 161.4728 2.2800e-
003

0.0176 166.7745
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 10 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 538
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.8900e-
003

0.2287 0.0942 1.2200e-
003

0.0448 1.9900e-
003

0.0468 0.0129 1.9100e-
003

0.0148 129.6897 129.6897 1.3200e-
003

0.0192 135.4337
Worker 0.0658 0.0406 0.6603 1.7700e-
003

0.2012 9.4000e-
004

0.2021 0.0534 8.7000e-
004

0.0542 181.1165 181.1165 4.1400e-
003

4.2200e-
003
182.4783
Total 0.0737 0.2693 0.7545 2.9900e-
003

0.2460 2.9300e-
003

0.2490 0.0663 2.7800e-
003

0.0690 310.8062 310.8062 5.4600e-
003

0.0234 317.9120
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 11 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 539
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.8900e-
003

0.2287 0.0942 1.2200e-
003

0.0448 1.9900e-
003

0.0468 0.0129 1.9100e-
003

0.0148 129.6897 129.6897 1.3200e-
003

0.0192 135.4337
Worker 0.0658 0.0406 0.6603 1.7700e-
003

0.2012 9.4000e-
004

0.2021 0.0534 8.7000e-
004

0.0542 181.1165 181.1165 4.1400e-
003

4.2200e-
003
182.4783
Total 0.0737 0.2693 0.7545 2.9900e-
003

0.2460 2.9300e-
003

0.2490 0.0663 2.7800e-
003

0.0690 310.8062 310.8062 5.4600e-
003

0.0234 317.9120
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 12 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 540
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0428 1.2415 0.5112 6.6400e-
003

0.2434 0.0108 0.2542 0.0701 0.0103 0.0804 704.0298 704.0298 7.1800e- 003

0.1040 735.2116
Worker 0.5298 0.3274 5.3194 0.0143 1.6208 7.6000e-
003

1.6284 0.4298 7.0000e-
003

0.4368 1,458.994
4 1,458.994
4 0.0333 0.0340 1,469.964
2 Total 0.5726 1.5688 5.8306 0.0209 1.8642 0.0184 1.8826 0.4999 0.0173 0.5173 2,163.024 2 2,163.024
2 0.0405 0.1381 2,205.175
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 13 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 541
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0428 1.2415 0.5112 6.6400e-
003

0.2434 0.0108 0.2542 0.0701 0.0103 0.0804 704.0298 704.0298 7.1800e- 003

0.1040 735.2116
Worker 0.5298 0.3274 5.3194 0.0143 1.6208 7.6000e-
003

1.6284 0.4298 7.0000e-
003

0.4368 1,458.994
4 1,458.994
4 0.0333 0.0340 1,469.964
2 Total 0.5726 1.5688 5.8306 0.0209 1.8642 0.0184 1.8826 0.4999 0.0173 0.5173 2,163.024 2 2,163.024
2 0.0405 0.1381 2,205.175
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 14 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 542
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 1.1576 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1903 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.3800e-
003

0.0980 0.0404 5.2000e-
004

0.0192 8.5000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.5813 55.5813 5.7000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

58.0430
Worker 0.0475 0.0294 0.4769 1.2800e-
003

0.1453 6.8000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.3000e-
004

0.0392 130.8064 130.8064 2.9900e-
003

3.0500e-
003
131.7899
Total 0.0509 0.1274 0.5173 1.8000e-
003

0.1645 1.5300e-
003

0.1661 0.0441 1.4500e-
003

0.0455 186.3877 186.3877 3.5600e-
003

0.0113 189.8329
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 15 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 543
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 1.1576 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1903 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.3800e-
003

0.0980 0.0404 5.2000e-
004

0.0192 8.5000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.5813 55.5813 5.7000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

58.0430
Worker 0.0475 0.0294 0.4769 1.2800e-
003

0.1453 6.8000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.3000e-
004

0.0392 130.8064 130.8064 2.9900e-
003

3.0500e-
003
131.7899
Total 0.0509 0.1274 0.5173 1.8000e-
003

0.1645 1.5300e-
003

0.1661 0.0441 1.4500e-
003

0.0455 186.3877 186.3877 3.5600e-
003

0.0113 189.8329
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 16 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 544
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 89.3122 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 89.5039 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.3800e-
003

0.0980 0.0404 5.2000e-
004

0.0192 8.5000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.5813 55.5813 5.7000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

58.0430
Worker 0.1060 0.0655 1.0639 2.8500e-
003

0.3242 1.5200e-
003

0.3257 0.0860 1.4000e-
003

0.0874 291.7989 291.7989 6.6600e-
003

6.8000e-
003
293.9928
Total 0.1093 0.1635 1.1043 3.3700e-
003

0.3434 2.3700e-
003

0.3457 0.0915 2.2200e-
003

0.0937 347.3802 347.3802 7.2300e-
003

0.0150 352.0359
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 17 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 545
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 89.5039 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.3800e-
003

0.0980 0.0404 5.2000e-
004

0.0192 8.5000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.5813 55.5813 5.7000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

58.0430
Worker 0.1060 0.0655 1.0639 2.8500e-
003

0.3242 1.5200e-
003

0.3257 0.0860 1.4000e-
003

0.0874 291.7989 291.7989 6.6600e-
003

6.8000e-
003
293.9928
Total 0.1093 0.1635 1.1043 3.3700e-
003

0.3434 2.3700e-
003

0.3457 0.0915 2.2200e-
003

0.0937 347.3802 347.3802 7.2300e-
003

0.0150 352.0359
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 18 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 546
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Heavy Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 48.00 19.00 0 0 0
General Heavy Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 28.00 13.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 19 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 547
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
Ri l

0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 General Heavy Industry 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Parking Lot 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.534849 0.056022 0.172639 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0 .005468

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 20 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 548
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 21 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 549
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 22 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 550
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Unmitigated 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.0494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 3.8500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Total 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 23 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 551
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.0494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 3.8500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Total 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 24 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 552
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:43 AMPage 25 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 553
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated)
Riverside-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.4 28

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2023Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 1 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 554
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Trips and VMT - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Grading - Left as default
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE's comments on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural Coating Emission Factors" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Solid Waste - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 133.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.93 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.37 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.02 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 36.52 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 17.13 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 48.51 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 1.97 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 0.95 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 15.20 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 3.22 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 89,670.00 89,667.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 9,960.00 9,963.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 176,400.00 176,404.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 2 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 555
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 52,000.00 35,264.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 34,412.40 34,588.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.17 0.81
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.07 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 111.19 0.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 9.36 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 7.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 57.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 13.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 3 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 556
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 6.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 66.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 20,736,187.50 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,303,250.00 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 941,270.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 4 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 557
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.6063 27.7438 21.0919 0.0465 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,582.966 9 4,582.966
9 1.1948 0.1392 4,640.649
3 Maximum 89.6063 27.7438 21.0919 0.0465 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,582.966 9 4,582.966
9 1.1948 0.1392 4,640.649
3 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.6063 27.7438 21.0919 0.0465 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,582.966 9 4,582.966
9 1.1948 0.1392 4,640.649
3 Maximum 89.6063 27.7438 21.0919 0.0465 19.7513 1.2680 21.0193 10.1283 1.1666 11.2950 0.0000 4,582.966 9 4,582.966
9 1.1948 0.1392 4,640.649
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 5 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 558
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.0949
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 6 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 559
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 149,445; Non-Residential Outdoor: 49,815; Striped Parking Area: 12,700 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 4.86
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 7 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 560
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 5.00 6.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 18.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 145.00 38.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 13.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 29.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 8 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 561
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.2079 0.0834 1.0500e-
003

0.0384 1.7100e-
003

0.0401 0.0111 1.6400e-
003

0.0127 111.4385 111.4385 1.1100e-
003

0.0165 116.3777
Worker 0.0171 0.0117 0.1490 4.5000e-
004

0.0559 2.6000e-
004

0.0562 0.0148 2.4000e-
004

0.0151 45.5855 45.5855 1.1400e-
003

1.2000e-
003

45.9719
Total 0.0234 0.2196 0.2324 1.5000e-
003

0.0943 1.9700e-
003

0.0963 0.0259 1.8800e-
003

0.0278 157.0240 157.0240 2.2500e-
003

0.0177 162.3496
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 9 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 562
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.2600e-
003

0.2079 0.0834 1.0500e-
003

0.0384 1.7100e-
003

0.0401 0.0111 1.6400e-
003

0.0127 111.4385 111.4385 1.1100e-
003

0.0165 116.3777
Worker 0.0171 0.0117 0.1490 4.5000e-
004

0.0559 2.6000e-
004

0.0562 0.0148 2.4000e-
004

0.0151 45.5855 45.5855 1.1400e-
003

1.2000e-
003

45.9719
Total 0.0234 0.2196 0.2324 1.5000e-
003

0.0943 1.9700e-
003

0.0963 0.0259 1.8800e-
003

0.0278 157.0240 157.0240 2.2500e-
003

0.0177 162.3496
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 10 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 563
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.2425 0.0973 1.2300e-
003

0.0448 2.0000e-
003

0.0468 0.0129 1.9100e-
003

0.0148 130.0116 130.0116 1.3000e-
003

0.0192 135.7739
Worker 0.0616 0.0422 0.5362 1.6000e-
003

0.2012 9.4000e-
004

0.2021 0.0534 8.7000e-
004

0.0542 164.1079 164.1079 4.1200e-
003

4.3200e-
003
165.4988
Total 0.0690 0.2847 0.6336 2.8300e-
003

0.2460 2.9400e-
003

0.2490 0.0663 2.7800e-
003

0.0691 294.1194 294.1194 5.4200e-
003

0.0236 301.2727
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 11 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 564
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.3100e-
003

0.2425 0.0973 1.2300e-
003

0.0448 2.0000e-
003

0.0468 0.0129 1.9100e-
003

0.0148 130.0116 130.0116 1.3000e-
003

0.0192 135.7739
Worker 0.0616 0.0422 0.5362 1.6000e-
003

0.2012 9.4000e-
004

0.2021 0.0534 8.7000e-
004

0.0542 164.1079 164.1079 4.1200e-
003

4.3200e-
003
165.4988
Total 0.0690 0.2847 0.6336 2.8300e-
003

0.2460 2.9400e-
003

0.2490 0.0663 2.7800e-
003

0.0691 294.1194 294.1194 5.4200e-
003

0.0236 301.2727
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 12 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 565
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.2434 0.0109 0.2542 0.0701 0.0104 0.0805 705.7770 705.7770 7.0400e- 003

0.1044 737.0585
Worker 0.4965 0.3397 4.3195 0.0129 1.6208 7.6000e-
003

1.6284 0.4298 7.0000e-
003

0.4368 1,321.980
0 1,321.980
0 0.0332 0.0348 1,333.184
8 Total 0.5362 1.6563 4.8479 0.0196 1.8642 0.0185 1.8826 0.4999 0.0174 0.5173 2,027.757 0 2,027.757
0 0.0402 0.1392 2,070.243
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 13 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 566
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0397 1.3166 0.5284 6.6600e-
003

0.2434 0.0109 0.2542 0.0701 0.0104 0.0805 705.7770 705.7770 7.0400e- 003

0.1044 737.0585
Worker 0.4965 0.3397 4.3195 0.0129 1.6208 7.6000e-
003

1.6284 0.4298 7.0000e-
003

0.4368 1,321.980
0 1,321.980
0 0.0332 0.0348 1,333.184
8 Total 0.5362 1.6563 4.8479 0.0196 1.8642 0.0185 1.8826 0.4999 0.0174 0.5173 2,027.757 0 2,027.757
0 0.0402 0.1392 2,070.243
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 14 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 567
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.1039 0.0417 5.3000e-
004

0.0192 8.6000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.7192 55.7192 5.6000e-
004

8.2400e-
003

58.1888
Worker 0.0445 0.0305 0.3873 1.1600e-
003

0.1453 6.8000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.3000e-
004

0.0392 118.5223 118.5223 2.9800e-
003

3.1200e-
003
119.5269
Total 0.0477 0.1344 0.4290 1.6900e-
003

0.1645 1.5400e-
003

0.1661 0.0441 1.4500e-
003

0.0455 174.2416 174.2416 3.5400e-
003

0.0114 177.7157
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 15 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 568
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 1.1576 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1903 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.1300e-
003

0.1039 0.0417 5.3000e-
004

0.0192 8.6000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.7192 55.7192 5.6000e-
004

8.2400e-
003

58.1888
Worker 0.0445 0.0305 0.3873 1.1600e-
003

0.1453 6.8000e-
004

0.1460 0.0385 6.3000e-
004

0.0392 118.5223 118.5223 2.9800e-
003

3.1200e-
003
119.5269
Total 0.0477 0.1344 0.4290 1.6900e-
003

0.1645 1.5400e-
003

0.1661 0.0441 1.4500e-
003

0.0455 174.2416 174.2416 3.5400e-
003

0.0114 177.7157
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 16 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 569
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 89.5039 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.1039 0.0417 5.3000e-
004

0.0192 8.6000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.7192 55.7192 5.6000e-
004

8.2400e-
003

58.1888
Worker 0.0993 0.0679 0.8639 2.5800e-
003

0.3242 1.5200e-
003

0.3257 0.0860 1.4000e-
003

0.0874 264.3960 264.3960 6.6400e-
003

6.9600e-
003
266.6370
Total 0.1024 0.1719 0.9056 3.1100e-
003

0.3434 2.3800e-
003

0.3457 0.0915 2.2200e-
003

0.0937 320.1152 320.1152 7.2000e-
003

0.0152 324.8258
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 17 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 570
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 89.5039 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003

0.1039 0.0417 5.3000e-
004

0.0192 8.6000e-
004

0.0201 5.5300e-
003

8.2000e-
004

6.3500e-
003

55.7192 55.7192 5.6000e-
004

8.2400e-
003

58.1888
Worker 0.0993 0.0679 0.8639 2.5800e-
003

0.3242 1.5200e-
003

0.3257 0.0860 1.4000e-
003

0.0874 264.3960 264.3960 6.6400e-
003

6.9600e-
003
266.6370
Total 0.1024 0.1719 0.9056 3.1100e-
003

0.3434 2.3800e-
003

0.3457 0.0915 2.2200e-
003

0.0937 320.1152 320.1152 7.2000e-
003

0.0152 324.8258
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 18 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 571
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Heavy Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 48.00 19.00 0 0 0
General Heavy Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 28.00 13.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 19 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 572
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
Ri l

0.00 0.00 0.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 0 0 0

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 20 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 573
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 21 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 574
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Heavy
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 22 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 575
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Unmitigated 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949

0.2692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.0494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 3.8500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Total 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 23 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 576
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.2692 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.0494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 3.8500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Total 2.3224 3.8000e-
004

0.0415 0.0000 1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0890 0.0890 2.3000e-
004

0.0949
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 24 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 577
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/24/2023 10:40 AMPage 25 of 25 Cottonwood & Edgemont (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 578
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
x Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); x Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; x Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 579
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 2 x Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); x Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
x Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); x Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
x Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); x Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
x Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
x Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
x Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. x Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. x Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. x Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
x Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sour ces drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
x Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. x Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 580
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 3 x Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. x Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. x Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
x Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
x Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
x Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of

groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
x Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
x Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 581
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
x Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
x Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
x Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. x Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
x Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
x Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. x Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
x Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. x Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
x Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
x Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation-

wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. x Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
x Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
x Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
x Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. x Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 582
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 5 principles into the policy-making process.
x Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
x Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
x Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
x Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later

listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
x Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. x Conducted aquifer tests.
x Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
x At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
x Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. x Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 583
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 584
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 7 Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwat er. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F ., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F . 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F ., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL-

contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 585
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 586
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 587
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002- 2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H
2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist
National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist

Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48

Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342

Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science , 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 588
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds , 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 589
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. ( 1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. ( 1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E ., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water .

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E . (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting . Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P . (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Breb bia, C.A. and P opov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23
rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 590
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant . The 23 rd Annual International
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23
rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 . Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference . Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants . Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference .

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 591
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust .

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association . Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants .. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D . (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E . and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aqu atic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. ( October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. ( 2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E ., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings . Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 592
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America . Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 gran t awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 593
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022

James River Corporation, Oregon: $1 0,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to constru ct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022

In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022

In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022

In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022

In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022

In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022

In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 594
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022

In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4
th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida
Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022

In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022

In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 595
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021

In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021

In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 596
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112
th Judicial District
Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017

In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 597
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015

In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015

In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015

In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015

In the Circuit Court of the 17
th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014

In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012

In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011

In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010

In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 598
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: George Hague
To: Julia Descoteaux
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Cottonwood & Edgmont (C&E) = Comments on IS/MND & City zoning map -- 4 Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 11:40:05 PM
Attachments: Screenshot 2023-02-22 at 10.35.36 PM.png
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
KWWSV
PRYDOJRYFLW\BKDOOJHQHUDOSODQ1HZ=RQLQJSGI
&LW\RI0RUHQR9DOOH\
V=RQLQJ0DS VKRZLQJGLIIHUHQW%3/,,DQG%3;ORFDWLRQV *RRGPRUQLQJ0V'HVFRWHDX[)HEUXDU\ 5H
&RPPHQWVRQWKH&RWWRQZRRG (GJHPRQW
& (
ZDUHKRXVHSURMHFW
V,QLWLDO6WXG\
,6
DQG0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQ
01'
²
,QWKH&LW\¶V1RWLFHRI,QWHQWWRDGRSWDVLQJOH0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQ 01'
WKHIROORZLQJFDQEHUHDG

"Project Description: The Cottonwood & Edgemont Project comprises a proposal for a Master Plot Plan (PEN21-0325), Plot Plan (PEN21-0326), and Tentative Parcel Map No. 38325 (PEN21-0327) to allow for the development of two (2) light industrial buildings with a total combined building floor area of 99,630 square feet (s.f.) on an approximately 7.94-gross-acre property (6.88 net acres). The Project would include cargo loading areas at each building (within an enclosed truck court with loading docks on the eastern sides of the proposed buildings), parking areas, landscaping, signage, and lighting."
"Potential Environmental Impacts: The City of Moreno Valley has prepared an Initial Study to determine the environmental effects associated with the above actions and finds the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concludes that all potentially significant impacts of the Project would be mitigated to a less than significant level."
"Comment Deadline: Pursuant to Section 15105(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has established a 20-day public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration which begins February 9, 2023, and ends March 1, 2023."
,WLVYHU\HYLGHQWIURP"the single Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration"DQGWKHUHIHUHQFHWR"the Project”WKHWZRZDUHKRXVHVDUHEHLQJWUHDWHGDVDVLQJOHSURMHFW 2QWKH1RWLFHRI&RPSOHWLRQ (QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQW7UDQVPLWWDO´SURYLGHVWKHIROORZLQJ
$VLQJOH³6LWH3ODQ´
7KH1RWLFHRI&RPSOHWLRQ (QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQW7UDQVPLWWDODJDLQVKRZVWKDWWKH& (ZDUHKRXVHLQDVLQJOH³6LWH3ODQ´ 7KH&RWWRQZRRG (GJHPRQWZDUHKRXVHLVDVLQJOHSURMHFWRI

VTIWDQGFDQQRWEHFRQVLGHUWZRGLIIHUHQWSURMHFWV7KLVVLQJOHSURMHFWLVEULQJLQJDOPRVWVTIWRIZDUHKRXVLQJWRRXUFLW\ZLWK DOOWKHQHJDWLYHLPSDFWVWKDWVXFKDODUJHSURMHFWZRXOGEULQJ²HVSHFLDOO\WRDFHQVXVWUDFWZLWKD&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQ UHSRUWDVVKRZQLQWKHIROORZLQJ

&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQ
Overall Percentiles
CalEnviroScreen 4.0
Percentile 99
Pollution Burden Percentile 95
Population Characteristics
Percentile 98
State law and even our own Environmental Justice Element of our city’s General Plan encourages jurisdictions/Moreno Valley to reduce the burden on people living in these areas, but instead the C&E warehouse brings even more pollution and because it is a MND and not an EIR there is no direct, Indirect, cumulative and growth inducing impact analysis. $VFDQEHVHHQLQWKHFLW\¶V]RQLQJPDSLQWKHOLQNIRXQGDERYHODQG]RQHG%XVLQHVV3DUN %3
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
/,
,QGXVWULDO
,
DQG%3;DUHDOOWKHVDPHFRORU7KHIDFWWKH\DUHWKHVDPHFRORUGRHVQ¶W PHDQ\RXFDQEXLOG%3/,,RU%3;RQDQ\ODQGV'XULQJWKH*HQHUDO3ODQ8SGDWHSURFHVVLWEHFDPHYHU\HYLGHQWWKDWHDFKRIWKHVH]RQHVZHUHSODFHGLQVSHFLILFORFDWLRQVEHFDXVHRIVXUURXQGLQJXVHV7KLV FDQEHVHHQRQWKHPDSIRXQGEHORZZKLFKLVDSRUWLRQRIWKHFLW\¶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

General Plan Designation: Business Park (BP), which provides areas for manufacturing, research and development, warehousing, and distribution, as well as office and support commercial activities.

Refer to Figure 4, Existing General Plan Land Use Designation The Figure 4 mentioned above has a city developed legend that tries to make the project’s lands both BP and LI. The City’s own zoning map indicates it is only BP as is shown in Figure 5. As can be read in the next paragraph and below the map BP doesn’t allow warehousing and is suppose to “provide a transition” between sensitive uses and more intense uses like warehousing.

The use of the General Plan BP everywhere in place of BP, LI, I , and BPX would allow warehousing almost everywhere within our city. We must honor the city’s zoning map to protect nearby sensitive resources and limit warehouse Industrial use to those allowed in the explanations found in the chart labeled "9.05.020 Industrial Districts” found below.

The correct complete wording for BP is below the map and as follows:7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHEXVLQHVVSDUN %3
GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHIRUOLJKWLQGXVWULDOUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWRIILFHEDVHG ILUPVDQGOLPLWHGVXSSRUWLYHFRPPHUFLDOLQDQDWWUDFWLYHDQGSOHDVDQWZRUNLQJHQYLURQPHQWDQGDSUHVWLJLRXVORFDWLRQ7KLVGLVWULFWLVintended to provide a transition between residential and other sensitive uses and more intense industrial and warehousing uses. 7KHIROORZLQJPDSLVDSRUWLRQRIWKHFLW\]RQLQJPDSZKLFKLQFOXGHVWKHSURMHFWVLWHIURPWKHOLQNIRXQGDERYH LWVKRZVGLIIHUHQWORFDWLRQVIRU%3/,,%3;ZLWKQRQHOLVWHGDV%3/, F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 599
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) R
"9.05.020 Industrial districts.
$%XVLQHVV3DUN'LVWULFW
%3
7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHEXVLQHVVSDUN
%3
GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHIRUOLJKWLQGXVWULDOUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWRIILFHEDVHGILUPVDQGOLPLWHGVXSSRUWLYHFRPPHUFLDOLQ DQDWWUDFWLYHDQGSOHDVDQWZRUNLQJHQYLURQPHQWDQGDSUHVWLJLRXVORFDWLRQ7KLVGLVWULFWLVLQWHQGHGWRSURYLGHDWUDQVLWLRQEHWZHHQUHVLGHQWLDODQGRWKHUVHQVLWLYHXVHVDQGPRUHLQWHQVHLQGXVWULDODQG ZDUHKRXVLQJXVHV
%/LJKW,QGXVWULDO'LVWULFW
/,
7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHOLJKWLQGXVWULDO
/,
GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHIRUOLJKWPDQXIDFWXULQJOLJKWLQGXVWULDOUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWZDUHKRXVLQJDQGGLVWULEXWLRQDQG PXOWLWHQDQWLQGXVWULDOXVHVDVZHOODVFHUWDLQVXSSRUWLQJDGPLQLVWUDWLYHDQGSURIHVVLRQDORIILFHVDQGFRPPHUFLDOXVHVRQDOLPLWHGEDVLV7KLVGLVWULFWLVLQWHQGHGDVDQDUHDIRUOLJKWLQGXVWULDOXVHVWKDWFDQPHHW KLJKSHUIRUPDQFHVWDQGDUGV7KLVGLVWULFWUHTXLUHVEXIIHULQJEHWZHHQUHVLGHQWLDOGLVWULFWVDQGLQGXVWULDODQGZDUHKRXVHVWUXFWXUHVJUHDWHUWKDQILIW\WKRXVDQG
VTXDUHIHHWLQEXLOGLQJDUHDZLWKLQWKH/,
GLVWULFW3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKHVSHFLDOVLWHGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVLQ6HFWLRQ
%

&,QGXVWULDO
,
7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHLQGXVWULDO
,
GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHIRUPDQXIDFWXULQJUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWZDUHKRXVLQJDQGGLVWULEXWLRQDQGPXOWLWHQDQWLQGXVWULDOXVHVDVZHOODVFHUWDLQ VXSSRUWLQJDGPLQLVWUDWLYHDQGSURIHVVLRQDORIILFHVDQGFRPPHUFLDOXVHVRQDOLPLWHGEDVLV7KLVGLVWULFWLVLQWHQGHGDVDQDUHDIRULQGXVWULDOXVHVWKDWFDQPHHWKLJKSHUIRUPDQFHVWDQGDUGVEXWWKDWIUHTXHQWO\GR QRWPHHWVLWHGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVDSSURSULDWHWRSODQQHGUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWSDUNV '%XVLQHVV3DUN0L[HG8VH
%3;
7KHSXUSRVHRIWKHEXVLQHVVSDUNPL[HGXVH
%3;
GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHORFDWLRQVIRUOLPLWHGFRQYHQLHQFHFRPPHUFLDODQGEXVLQHVVVXSSRUWVHUYLFHVZLWKLQFORVH SUR[LPLW\WRLQGXVWULDODQGEXVLQHVVSDUNXVHV
2UG
2UG

([K%

2UG

2UG

´
The C&E warehouse with its almost 100,000 sq ft doesn’t fit the definition for BP in letter “A” found above. It better fits the definition in letter “C” found above for Industrial. In fact Appendix G: Greenhouse Gas Report reads as follows:
"The Project is an industrial use and would not be required to adhere to this measure" Page 63 and again on page 64. 7KH& (SURMHFWLVDVLQJOHSURMHFWRIDOPRVWVTIWRIZDUHKRXVLQJ$V$SSHQGL[*UHIHUVWRLWWKHSURMHFWLV³DQLQGXVWULDOXVH´DQGGRHVQ¶WEHORQJRQODQGGHVLJQDWHG%3RQWKHFLW\¶V]RQLQJ0DS DQGEDVHGRQWKHFLW\¶VRZQ³
,QGXVWULDO'LVWULFW´&KDUWIRXQGDERYH
$IXOO(,5PXVWEHUHTXLUHGWRIXOO\DGGUHVVWKHGLUHFWLQGLUHFWFXPXODWLYHDQGJURZWKLQGXFLQJLPSDFWVIURPDOOIRUPVRISROOXWLRQDQGRWKHULPSDFWVWRWKRVHLQWKLVDOUHDG\EXUGHQFHQVXVWUDFWDVFDQEH VHHQDERYH$IXOO(,5ZRXOGGRDPXFKEHWWHUMRERIDGGUHVVLQJDOOWKHGLUHFWLQGLUHFWFXPXODWLYHDQGJURZWKLQGXFLQJLPSDFWVWRWKRVHDUHDVRIIVLWHWKDWDUHSDUWRIWKLVSURMHFWEXWDUHLQDGHTXDWHO\ DGGUHVVHGDQGWKHUHIRUPDNHVWKHSURMHFW
VDQDO\VLVLQDGHTXDWH
3OHDVHNHHSPHLQIRUPHGRIDOOIXWXUHGRFXPHQWVDQGPHHWLQJVUHODWHGWRWKLVSURMHFW 6LQFHUHO\
*HRUJH+DJXH
6LHUUD&OXE
0RUHQR9DOOH\*URXS
&RQVHUYDWLRQ&KDLU
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 600
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Catherine Lin
Subject: Fwd: PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 11:35:13 AM
6HHDWWDFKHG
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Mauricio Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 10:01:05 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Subject: PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326

Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good Morning Julia,

Thank you for including Riverside Transit Agency in the development review of the 2 warehouses on Old 215 Rd. After reviewing the plans, there are no comments to submit for this particular project at this time.

Thank you,

Mauricio Alvarez, MBA
Planning Analyst
Riverside Transit Agency
p: 951.565.5260 | e: [email protected]
Website | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
1825 Third Street, Riverside, CA 92507

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 601
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Catherine Lin
Subject: Fwd: PEN 21-0325, PEN 21-0326 and PEN 21-0327
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 11:55:05 AM
6HHEHORZ
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 11:50:00 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Subject: PEN 21-0325, PEN 21-0326 and PEN 21-0327

Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
I am writing with concerns about the Mitagated Negative Declaration for this project. Even though the only access to the project is from old 215, all the truck traffic has to pass close to existing residential properties which will cause a lot of noise and air pollution for thr residence in the area. I do not think the project takes this into enough consideration. The area also has had a lot of troubles the sewer and water availablity and I do not see where that is adequatly addressed.

With all the existing warehouse approved in the City I fell it would be best to have a 60 or 90 day moratorium on new warehouse projects.

Thank You Steve Jiannino
24701 Valley Ranch Rd.

Moreno Valley, CA 92557
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 602
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: George Hague
To: Julia Descoteaux
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher; City Clerk
Subject: Comments on the Cottonwood & Edgmeont warehouse project & Land Use and Community Character (LCC) --5 Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 11:28:08 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
*RRGPRUQLQJ0V'HVFRWHDX[)HEUXDU\
5H
&RPPHQWVRQWKH&RWWRQZRRG (GJHPRQW
& (

VTIWZDUHKRXVHSURMHFW¶V
,QLWLDO6WXG\
,6
DQG0LWLJDWHG1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQ
01'

7KHFLW\DSSURYHGLWV*HQHUDO3ODQLQ-XQHRIDQGDGRSWHGVRPHYHU\LPSRUWDQW/DQG 8VHDQG&RPPXQLW\&KDUDFWHU
/&&
*RDOVDQG3ROLFLHVWRSURWHFWDOORIXVZKRVHOHFWHG
0RUHQR9DOOH\WRUDLVHRXUIDPLOLHV
%HORZDUHIRXURIWKHVHWKDWDUHLQFRQIOLFWZLWKSODFLQJDQDOPRVWVTIWZDUHKRXVH SURMHFWQHDUIDPLO\KRPHV
DVQHDUDVIW
DQGDFURVVWKHVWUHHWIURPDFKXUFK
IHHW
²
VRPH\DUGVZKLFKSHRSOHHQMR\DUHHYHQFORVHUWKDQWKHLUKRPHV Goal LCC-3: Build a distinctive sense of place and pride in Moreno Valley.
+RZDUHZHEXLOGLQJSULGHLQ0RUHQR9DOOH\IRURXUUHVLGHQWVZLWKWKH& (ZDUHKRXVH SURMHFWZKHQLWZLOOEULQJWR[LFGLHVHOWUXFNVGULYLQJDQGLGOLQJQHDUWRWKHLUKRPHV'LHVHO SROOXWLRQLVYHU\KDUPIXODQGZLOOPDNHWKRVHZLWKDVWKPDKDYHDGLIILFXOWWLPHDQGPD\DOVR FRQWULEXWHWRWKRVHGHYHORSLQJDVWKPDDVZHOODVRWKHUPHGLFDOLVVXHV'LHVHOSROOXWLRQZLOO DOVRFRPHIURPPXFKRIWKHHTXLSPHQWWKDWLVXVHGGXULQJWKHRSHUDWLRQRIDZDUHKRXVHDV ZHOODVGXULQJFRQVWUXFWLRQ<RXPXVWEHDEOHWRIDFWRULQDOOGLUHFWLQGLUHFWFXPXODWLYHDQG JURZWKLQGXFLQJLPSDFWVZKLFKWKLV01'GRHVQ¶WSURYLGH7KHSURMHFWPXVWEHUHTXLUHGWR SURGXFHDIXOO(,5WRSURYLGHWKLVDQGRWKHULPSRUWDQWLQIRUPDWLRQIRUWKHSXEOLFDQGGHFLVLRQ PDNHUVSULRUWRDQ\YRWH

LCC.3-1 Insist on high-quality development that is sensitive to surrounding context throughout the city and particularly in centers and corridors. 7KLVLVDSROLF\\RXZRXOGZDQWHQIRUFHGRQDQ\SURMHFWEXLOWQHDU\RXUKRPHEXWKRZLVD ODUJHZDUHKRXVHSURMHFWWKDWLVOHVVWKDQIWWRIWVHQVLWLYHWRLWVVXUURXQGLQJVZKHQWKRVH LQFOXGHIDPLO\KRPHV0DQ\RIWKHVHKRPHVDUHRQWKHEDFNVLGHRIWKLVZDUHKRXVHZKHUHWKH 'LHVHO7UXFNVWXUQDURXQGEDFNXSLGOHORDGDQGXQORDGFDUJR+RZFDQWKHVHIDPLOLHV FRQVLGHUWKLVZDUHKRXVHSURMHFW+LJK4XDOLW\ZKLFK/&&UHDGV:($5(72,16,67 3/($6('2127$&&(37:$5(+286,1*$67+(21/<86(7+$7&$1%( F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 603
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) %8,/7217+,6%3=21(7+(5($5(0$1<27+(548$/,7<86(67+$7$5( 3(50,77('
LCC.3-2 Use development standards to ensure smooth transitions for areas that border one another so that neighborhoods and districts maintain their unique qualities while being compatible with one another. 6PRRRRRRWK7UDQVLWLRQZLWKQHDUE\VXUURXQGLQJVHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVLV127WKHQDPHRIWKLV ZDUHKRXVHSURMHFW7KH\GRQRWHYHQSXWDIHQFHHQWLUHO\DURXQGWKLV,QGXVWULDO:DUHKRXVH SURMHFW7KHKHLJKWRIWKHIHQFHWKH\XVHHDVLO\DOORZVWR[LFGLHVHOVRRWIURPWKHSURMHFW¶V WUXFN
VDOPRVWIWH[KDXVWVWDFNVWRHQWHUWKHDUHDVZKHUHSHRSOHOLYH7KLVLVMXVWRQHRI PDQ\H[DPSOHVZKHUHWKHSURMHFWIDLOVWREHVHQVLWLYHWRVRXQGLQJVDQGSURYLGHDVPRRWK WUDQVLWLRQZLWKIDPLO\KRPH1RLVHDQG/LJKWSROOXWLRQIURPZKDWZLOOSUREDEO\EHFRPHD GD\DQGQLJKWRSHUDWLRQLVDQRWKHU7KH\FRXOGOLPLWRSHUDWLRQWR0RQGD\)ULGD\ DQGIURPDPWR
SPEXWWKH\KDYHQ¶W/LJKWVRQWLPHUVWRGLPWRZKHQPRWLRQLVQ¶W GHWHFWHGLVVRPHWKLQJWKDWQHHGVWREHUHTXLUHG(TXLSPHQWZLWKEDFNXSZDUQLQJVRXQGVPXVW EHUHTXLUHGWRKDYHGHYLFHVWKDWOLPLWWKHVRXQGWRMXVWDERYHDPELHQWVRXQGOHYHOV8VHWKH PDWHULDOWKDWFDQEHDSSOLHGWRZDUHKRXVHZDOOVWRUHGXFHGHFLEHOVZLWKLQWKHSURMHFWDUHD 7KHVHDUHDOVRPLWLJDWLRQVWKLVSURMHFWFRXOGGREXWLVQ¶W7KHPDLQSUREOHPLVWU\LQJWRSXW OLSVWLFNRQDZDUHKRXVHWRPDNHLWVHQVLWLYHWRWKHVXUURXQGLQJIDPLO\KRPHVDQGSURYLGHD VPRRWKWUDQVLWLRQEHFRPHVDOPRVWLPSRVVLEOH7KHUHIRUWKH\GRQRWEULQJSULGHWRDQDUHD ZLWKKRPHVVRFORVH
LCC.3-17 Screen and buffer nonresidential projects to protect adjacent residential property and other sensitive land uses when necessary to mitigate noise, glare and other adverse effects on adjacent uses. 7KH& (ZDUHKRXVHLVQ
WVFUHHQHGDQGEXIIHUHGIURPDGMDFHQWUHVLGHQWLDOXVH$VPHQWLRQHG DERYHWKHZDOOLVWRRVKRUWDQGIDLOVWRJRDURXQGWKHHQWLUHSURMHFW7KH01'UHDGVWKDW RUQDPHQWDOWUHHVZLOOEHXVHGZKHQHYHUJUHHQWUHHVDUHQHHGHGWKDWJURZWRDKHLJKWWDOOHUWKDQ WKHZDUHKRXVH7KHWUHHVQHHGWREHLQGRXEOHRYHUODSSLQJURZVZLWKDZLGHHQRXJKVSUHDG WKDWPDNHVDVROLGZDOORIHYHUJUHHQWUHHVWRILOWHUGLHVHODQGRWKHUSROOXWLRQVDVZHOODVOLPLW VRPHQRLVHDQGOLJKWJODUHSROOXWLRQ/LJKWVRQEXLOGLQJDQGSROHVPXVWEHXQGHUIWDQG GLPPHGWRZKHQPRWLRQLVQ¶WGHWHFWHGIRUPLQXWHV7UXFNDQGRWKHUYHKLFOHOLJKWV PXVWEHWXUQHGRIIZLWKLQILYHPLQXWHVRISDUNLQJ'LHVHO$OWHUQDWLYH3RZHU8QLWV $38

PXVWQRWEHDOORZHGWRRSHUDWHIRUPRUHWKDQDWRWDORIILYHPLQXWHV7KHSURMHFWPXVWQRW DOORZUHIULJHUDWLRQDUHDVDVSDUWRILWVZDUHKRXVHRSHUDWLRQThere are many things in addition to all of those mentioned above that the C&E warehouse could and should do to meet the intent of LCC.3-17, but ISN’T
6RPHRIWKHPDQ\RWKHUXVHVZLWKLQ%XVLQHVV3DUN
%3
WKDWLVZULWWHQLQWKHFLW\¶V³

LQGXVWULDOGLVWULFWV´LQFOXGHVWKHIROORZLQJ
7KHSULPDU\SXUSRVHRIWKHEXVLQHVVSDUN
%3

GLVWULFWLVWRSURYLGHIRUOLJKWLQGXVWULDOUHVHDUFKDQGGHYHORSPHQWRIILFHEDVHGILUPVDQG OLPLWHGVXSSRUWLYHFRPPHUFLDOLQDQDWWUDFWLYHDQGSOHDVDQWZRUNLQJHQYLURQPHQWDQGD SUHVWLJLRXVORFDWLRQThis district is intended to provide a transition between residential and other sensitive uses and more intense industrial and warehousing uses." F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 604
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 7KH& (ZDUHKRXVHLVFRXQWHUWRWKHFLW\¶VRZQZRUGLQJDVFDQEHUHDGLQWKH
LQGXVWULDOGLVWULFW´FKDUWDVVHHQLQWKHODVWSDUDJUDSKDQGVHQWHQFHIRXQGDERYH The cities of Pomona, Colton, Chino, Riverside, Redlands, Norco and Jurupa Valley have all instituted some form of warehouse moratorium mainly to protect people from harmful diesel truck pollution — especially children, the elderly and pregnant women.

Some may initially be only 45 days to allow staff to develop wording for a longer moratorium.

The least Moreno Valley can do is not site warehouse projects with their harmful diesel trucks near people’s homes.

Please keep me informed of meeting and documents related to this project.

Sincerely,
George Hague
Sierra Club
Moreno Valley Group
Conservation Chair
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 605
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Catherine Lin
Subject: Fwd: Cottonwood & Edgemont Warehouse
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 12:27:30 PM
6HHDWWDFKHG
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 12:26:57 PM
To: Ann McKibben <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Cottonwood & Edgemont Warehouse

0V0F.LEEHQ
7KDQN\RXIRU\RXUFRPPHQWV
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
From: Ann McKibben <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 11:48:56 AM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Cottonwood & Edgemont Warehouse

Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
)HEUXDU\

-XOLD'HVFRWHDX[
3ODQQLQJ'HSDUWPHQW
&LW\RI0RUHQR9DOOH\
)UHGHULFN6WUHHW
0RUHQR9DOOH\&$

9LDHPDLO
MXOLDG#PRYDORUJ

'HDU0V'HVFRWHDX[

5H
&RWWRQZRRG (GJHPRQW:DUHKRXVH²1R6XSSRUW

,WLVGLVDSSRLQWLQJWRVHHWKHFLW\ZRUNWRSODFHODUJHZDUHKRXVHVQH[WWRKRPHVDGMDFHQWWR KRPHVFORVHWRKRPHV,WLVGLVDSSRLQWLQJWRVHHWKHFLW\SXWUHVLGHQWV¶KHDOWKDWULVNLQFUHDVH F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 606
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) WUXFNWUDIILFDQGGHQLJUDWHWKHTXDOLW\RIOLIHIRUWKRVHOLYLQJQHDUE\
,GRQRWVXSSRUWWKLVSURMHFW3OHDVHQRWLI\PHRIDOOKHDULQJVDQGGRFXPHQWVYLDP\HPDLO

DGGUHVV
DWPFNLEEHQ#URDGUXQQHUFRP

6LQFHUHO\

Ann McKibben

$QQ0F.LEEHQ
0RUHQR9DOOH\&$

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 607
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Sean P. Kelleher; Catherine Lin
Subject: Fwd: PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326, TPM 38325 (PEN21-0327) Cottonwood / Edgemont Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 5:05:10 PM
Attachments: image001.png
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Liao, William <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:51:12 PM
To: Julia Descoteaux <[email protected]>
Cc: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request <[email protected]>; Wildey, Paul L. <[email protected]>
Subject: PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326, TPM 38325 (PEN21-0327) Cottonwood / Edgemont
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hi Julia.

Just looked at PEN21-0325, PEN21-0326, TPM 38325 (PEN21-0327) Cottonwood / Edgemont. No real concerns at the moment. There is an existing 2” gas main extending into APN 263-190-015. We have an active order for its abandonment and should be on our way soon. Please help me ensure the owner/developer contacts USA / Dig Alert prior to any excavation activities so we can get our personnel out for Locate & Mark. Also, if owner/developer needs gas service, please have them contact our Builder Services site to begin the application process as soon as possible, at https://www.socalgas.com/for-your-business/builder-services .

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Will Liao
Region Planning Supervisor
Redlands HQ / Southeast Region
Desk: 213-244-4543
Mobile: 562-889-1981

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 608
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 609
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) From: Julia Descoteaux
To: Catherine Lin; Sean P. Kelleher
Subject: Fwd: Edgemont & Cottonwood IS/MND response
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 5:05:07 PM
Attachments: moval_cottonwood_ismnd_1mar23.pdf
*HW2XWORRNIRUL26
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development
City of Moreno Valley
p: 951.413.3209 | e: [email protected] w: www.moval.org
14177 Frederick St., Moreno Valley, CA, 92553
From: Marven Norman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 4:40:03 PM
To: Planning Email_DG <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean P. Kelleher <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Edgemont & Cottonwood IS/MND response

Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
+HOOR
0\HPDLOWR-XOLDEHORZUHFHLYHGDQDXWRPDWLFUHSO\LQGLFDWLQJWKDWVKHZLOOQRWEHUHWXUQLQJ XQWLO0DUFKVR,ZDQWHGWRPDNHVXUHWKDWWKLVHPDLODQGOHWWHUDUHUHFHLYHGWRGD\ Cheers,
Marven E. Norman (he/him/his), Policy Coordinator
Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice
Centro de Acción Comunitaria y Justicia Ambiental
| C: (951) 543-1743 | E: [email protected]
| W: https://www.ccaej.org
)RUZDUGHGPHVVDJH
)URP
Marven NormanPDUYHQQ#FFDHMRUJ
!
'DWH
:HG0DUDW
ௗ30
6XEMHFW
(GJHPRQW &RWWRQZRRG,601'UHVSRQVH
7R
MXOLDG#PRYDORUJ
!
&F
*HRUJH+DJXHJEKDJXH#JPDLOFRP!
+L-XOLD
3OHDVHILQGDWWDFKHGDOHWWHUIURP&&$(-UHVSRQGLQJWRWKH,601'IRUWKHSURSRVHG (GJHZRRG &RWWRQZRRGSURMHFWZKLFKZDVPDGHDYDLODEOHIRUUHYLHZDQGFRPPHQW$Q DFNQRZOHGJHPHQWRIUHFHLSWRIWKLVFRPPHQWZRXOGEHDSSUHFLDWHG Cheers,
Marven E. Norman (he/him/his), Policy Coordinator
Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice
F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 610
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) Centro de Acción Comunitaria y Justicia Ambiental
| C: (951) 543-1743 | E: [email protected] | W: https://www.ccaej.org F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 611
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
“Bringing People Together to Improve Our Social and Natural Environment” Mailing Address Physical Address Tel: 951-360-8451
P.O. Box 33124 3840 Sunnyhill Drive, Suite A Fax: 951-360-5950 Jurupa Valley CA 92519 Jurupa Valley CA 92509 www.ccaej.org February 27, 2023

City of Moreno Valley
Attn: Julia Descoteaux, Senior Planner
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552

Submitted via email to [email protected].

Re: Cottonwood & Edgemont Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Dear Julia Descoteaux,

On behalf of Moreno Valley community members, this letter is in response to the Initial Study/MND for the proposed Cottonwood & Edgemont Project (SCH #2023020234) that would be constructed on an approximately 7.95 acre site there in Moreno Valley. After reviewing the documents and other information, we are opposed to the construction of this facility.

It is concerning to see that this Project is being proposed right in the middle of an existing community and barely half a mile from Edgemont Elementary School. The community is already one of the most polluted in the state, with the census tract where it is located being ranked at the 99th percentile overall 95th percentile for pollution burden in CalEnviroScreen 4.0. This project will greatly increase truck traffic and therefore diesel pollutants, causing severe health impacts because it has been strategically imbedded within this community which is already defined by the EPA as being in extreme nonattainment for air quality measures such as PM

2.5. We believe that this project is in direct violation of California government code §65040.12(d)(2) because it concentrates industrial uses in proximity to schools and residential dwellings within an already overburdened environmental justice community. Furthermore, government code §65302 (h)(1) identifies considerations to reduce compound health risk to environmental justice communities “by means that include…reduction of pollution exposure.” The placement of yet another warehouse in the community is in diametric opposition to that requirement.

To make matters worse, due to a size of only 49,815 square feet for each building (for a total of 99,630 square feet for both), the warehouses both individually and collectively fall below the threshold of the SCAQMD’s Indirect Source Rule (“ISR”) which is set at 100,000 square feet, thus allowing this Project to slip through the cracks on being held accountable. Thus, this Project would be adding to the cumulative burden in the community, worsening what is already one of the worst situations in the state. We view this as unacceptable and would urge the City to not move forward with further approval of the Project, but instead return to the drawing board to identify reduction of pollution exposure.

Thank you for your time and attention to receiving these comments. If there are any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us for clarification.

Sincerely,

Ana Gonzalez
Executive Director

CC: Sierra Club

CCAEJ is a long-standing community based organization with over 40 years of experience advocating for stronger regulations through strategic campaigns and building a base of community power. Most notably, CCAEJ’s founder Penny Newman won a landmark federal case against Stringfellow Construction which resulted in the `Stringfellow Acid Pits’ being declared one of the first Superfund sites in the nation. CCAEJ prioritizes community voices as we continue our grassroots efforts to bring lasting environmental justice to the Inland Valley Region.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 612
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Figure1: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 results map for census tract 6065042505 where the Project is proposed to be built with the Project location marked in green.

F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 613
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map) 3900 Main Street, Riverside, CA 92522 | Phone: (951) 826-5371 | RiversideCA.gov Community Development
Department
Planning Division
March 1, 2023
Julia Descoteaux
Senior Planner
Community Development Department
141777 Frederick Street
PO Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Subject: City of Riverside’s Review of a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Cottonwood & Edgemont Project
Dear Ms. Descoteaux:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Cottonwood & Edgemont Project. The City of Riverside (City) understands that the proposed Cottonwood & Edgemont project consists of a Master Plot Plan (PEN21-0325), Plot Plan (PEN21-0326), and Tentative Parcel Ma p No. 38325 (PEN21-0327) to allow for the development of two light industrial buildings with a total combined building floor area of approximately 99,630 square feet. The City also understands that the project includes cargo loading areas at each building along with additional site improvements.

The City has reviewed the project documents, and we wish to provide the following comments:

Community and Economic Development Department – Planning Division:
x Master Plot Plan (PEN21-0325) and Plot Plan (PEN21-0325 ) should conform with the City’s 2020 Good Neighbor Guidelines (GNG-2020) for Siting and New and/or Modified Industrial Facilities and implementing Zoning regulations to the greatest extent possible. The nearest sensitive receptors within the City of Riverside are established residential uses located west of Old 215 Frontage Road at approximately 385 linear feet from the project site property line. Other sensitive uses likely exist closer to the project site within the City of Moreno Valley and should be given similar consideration to protect the public health, safety and welfare.

CITY OF RIVERSIDE GOOD NEIGHBOR GUIDELINES (riversideca.gov) F.1.aa
Packet Pg. 614
Attachment: Planning Commission Notice of Intent Comments (6240 : Master Plot Plan, a Plot Plan and a Tentative Parcel Map)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Moreno Valley City CouncilMay 2, 2023

Moreno Valley City Council
May 2, 2023