Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) on January 23, 2024. The PIP is designed to encourage cities and counties to obtain a Prohousing Designation. The City of Moreno Valley received a Prohousing Designation from HCD on June 16, 2023. The PIP is funded through Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), which established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund. The Fund allocates five percent of annual real estate transaction fees as a permanent source of funding for the incentive program. Approximately $9,483,000 is available for 2024.
Applicant eligibility is limited to cities and counties. To be eligible for grant funding, an applicant must submit a completed application by March 15, 2024 and must obtain a Prohousing Designation from HCD before March 30, 2024 (the City of Moreno Valley received the Prohousing Designation on June 16, 2023). In addition, applicants must also meet all the following threshold requirements for participation in the Program:
▪ Have an adopted housing element in substantial compliance with Housing Element Law.
▪ Submit a Housing Element Annual Progress Report for the current or prior year, as applicable.
▪ Achieve a Prohousing Designation.
▪ Submit a complete application as determined by HCD.
▪ Adopt a resolution authorizing submittal of the PIP application. ▪ Comply with state and federal housing laws.
PIP grant award funds must be used for planning or implementation activities related to housing and community development, as outlined below. For 2024, staff recommends applying for Activity #2 - Affordable rental and ownership housing:
1. The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live -work, rental housing that is affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate -income households, including necessary operating subsidies.
2. Affordable rental and ownership housing that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of area median income, or 150 percent of area median income in high-cost areas.
3. Matching portions of funds placed into local or regional housing trust funds.
4. Matching portions of funds available through the Low and Moderate -Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code.
5. Capitalized reserves for services connected to the creation of new permanent supportive housing.
6. Accessibility modifications.
7. Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes.
8. Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
9. Fiscal incentives or matching funds to local agencies that approve new housing for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate-income households.
The PIP awards grant funds based on each jurisdiction’s population and Prohousing Designation Program score. PIP -eligible applicants may receive a base award amount I.6
Packet Pg. 128
calculated according to population estimates as of January 1, 2023. If selected and depending on funding availability, 2024 applicants like Moreno Valley with a population between 100,000 and 299,999 receive a base award amount of $750,000. Selected applicants may also receive a bonus award based on the applicant’s Prohousing Designation score, which is multiplied by $10,000. With Moreno Valley’s Prohousing Designation score of 37, the City’s bonus award amount could be as much as $370,000.
Combined, the City’s application is for $1,120,000. PIP 2024 grant funds must be expended by June 30, 2026.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1 Approve and authorize the recommended actions. Staff recommends this alternative because it allows the City to apply for Prohousing Incentive funds and to use them to serve residents though qualified programs.
Alternative 2 Decline to approve the recommended actions. Staff DOES NOT recommend this alternative because it prevents the application for Prohousing Incentive Program funds.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact at this time.
NOTIFICATION
Publication of the City Council Agenda.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:
Name Michele Patterson Name Cruz Esparza IV
Title Economic Development Manager Title Economic Development & Housing Director
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life I.6
Packet Pg. 129
6. Youth Programs
ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.
1. PIP Resolution
2. PIP Grant Application
APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 2/27/24 7:29 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .
City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 2/28/24 8:48 AM I.6
Packet Pg. 130
1 Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AN
APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, PROHOUSING
INCENTIVE PROGRAM (PIP) FUNDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safe ty Code 50470 et. Seq, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is authorized to issue Guidelines as part of an incentive program (hereinafter referred to by the Department as the Prohousing Incentive Program or “PIP”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, desires to submit a PIP grant applicat ion package (“Application”), on the forms provided by the Department, for approval of grant funding for eligible activities toward planning and implementation activities related to housi ng and community development as a result of meeting eligibility criteria including but not limited to Prohousing Designation; and
WHEREAS, the Department has issued Guidelines and Application on January 23, 2024 in the amount of $9,483,402.17 for PIP.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA (“APPLICANT”), DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Departm ent in response to the NOFA, and to apply for the PIP grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $1,120,000.
2. In connection with t he PIP grant, if the Application is approved by the Department, the City Manager or his designee of t he City of Moreno Valley, California is authorized and directed to enter into, ex ecute, and deliver on behalf of the Applicant, a State of California Agreement (Standard Agreement) for the amount of $1,120,000, and any and all other doc uments required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the PIP grant, the Applicant’s obligations related thereto, and all amendments thereto, and all amendments thereto.
3. The Applicant shall be s ubject to the terms and condit ions as specified in the Guidelines, and the Standar d Agreement provided by the Department after approval. The Application and any and all accompanying documents are incorporated in full as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines repr esented in the Application will be enforceable through the fully executed Standard Agreement. Pursuant to the Guidelines and in conjunction with t he terms of the St andard Agreement, the Applicant hereby agrees to use the funds for eligible uses and allowable expenditures in the manner presented and specifically identified in the approved I.6.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: PIP Resolution (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP)
2 Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Application.
4. The City Clerk shall certif y to the passage of this reso lution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Reso lution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March 2024 by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley by the following vote count:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Steve B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
I.6.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: PIP Resolution (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP) Prohousing Incentive Pilot
(PIP) Program
2024 Application for Local Governments
State of California
Governor, Gavin Newsom
Melinda Grant, Undersecretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development
Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
Final Filing Date: March 15, 2024
2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 500, Sacramento, CA 95833 Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-and-funding/programs-active/prohousing- incentive-program
Email: [email protected]
I.6.b
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: PIP Grant Application (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP) X
X
X
X
X
X
Demonstration of meeting threshold criteria shall be determined by the Department in its sole and absolute discretion. No documentation of meeting threshold requirements is required in the application unless requested by the Department.
Housing Element Annual Progress Report submittal pursuant to Government Code Section 65400 for the current or prior year, as applicable.
Prohousing Designation: An awarded or completed Prohousing Designation Application with an authorizing resolution must be submitted prior to or in conjunction with the Applicant’s PIP Application. PIP Awards cannot be made until a Prohousing Designation is awarded.
A complete application as determined by the Department.
An authorizing resolution authorizing submittal of the application to the Program that materially comports with the Program’s requirements and is legally sufficient as determined in the Department’s reasonable discretion, including an authorized representative. See Attachment B of the PIP Guidelines for required resolution format.
Compliance with state and federal housing laws as determined by the sole discretion of HCD.
Prohousing Incentive Pilot (PIP) Program Application Instructions The applicant is applying to the Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) for a grant authorized under the provisions pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50470(2)(C)(i). PIP is designed to encourage cities and counties to achieve Prohousing Designation. Please refer to the PIP Guidelines and 2024 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for detailed information on eligible uses and awards. If you have questions regarding this application or the PIP Program, email [email protected].
If approved for funding, the PIP application is incorporated as part of your Standard Agreement with the Department. To be considered for funding, all sections of this application, including attachments if required, must be complete and accurate.
In order to be considered for funding, all applicants must submit a complete, signed application to [email protected] by March 15, 2024. Pursuant to Section 202 of the PIP Guidelines, all applicants must meet the following threshold requirements to be eligible for funding:
An adopted housing element in substantial compliance, as determined by the Department, pursuant to Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of Gov. Code) in accordance with Government Code section 65585, subdivision (h).
Threshold Requirements
I.6.b
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: PIP Grant Application (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP) Applicant
Applicant Agency Type
Mailing Address
City Zip Code
County
Website
DUNS Number
TIN
Authorized Representative Name
Authorized Representative Title
Phone
Fax
Email
Contact Person Name
Contact Person Title
Phone
Fax
Email
Signature Date
Name Title
Riverside
https://moval.gov/index.shtml
177134186
Cruz Esparza IV Econ Dev & Housing D
As the official designated by the governing body (authorized representative above and in resolution), I hereby certify that, if approved by HCD for funding through PIP, the applicant assumes the responsibilities specified in the NOFA and certifies that the information, statements, and other contents contained in this application are true and correct.
(951) 413-3478
Econ Dev Manager
(951) 413-3030
[email protected]
Applicant Information
City of Moreno Valley
City
14177 Federick St
Moreno Valley 92553
(951) 413-3478
33-0076484
Cruz Esparza IV
Econ Dev & Housing Director
(951) 413-3238
[email protected]
Michele Patterson
I.6.b
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: PIP Grant Application (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP) X
Eligible Applicants must use award funds towards any planning or implementation activities related to housing and community development including, but not limited to, any eligible uses pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50470(b)(2)(D), as described below. Please indicate which of the following the applicant will use award funds toward:
Eligible Uses
Objective
Summary of Proposed Activities
(v) Capitalized reserves for services connected to the creation of new permanent supportive housing, including, but not limited to, developments funded through the Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention Bond Act of 2014. (vi) Assisting persons who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness, including providing rapid rehousing, rental assistance, navigation centers, emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent and transitional housing. (i) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is affordable to extremely low, very low, low-, and moderate-income households, including necessary operating subsidies. (ii) Affordable rental and ownership housing that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of area median income, or 150 percent of area median income in high-cost areas. (iii) Matching portions of funds placed into local or regional housing trust funds. (vii) Accessibility modifications.
(viii) Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes. (ix) Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, downpayment assistance. (x) Fiscal incentives or matching funds to local agencies that approve new housing for extremely low, very low, low-, and moderate-income households. (iv) Matching portions of funds available through the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code.
Responsible Party
City of Moreno
Valley
Affordable rental and
ownership housing
NotesEligible Use Category
ii
End
03/15/2026
Est. Cost
$1,120,000
Begin
07/01/2024
Statement of Work Plan
Funds to be used to assist in providing affordable
housing, including rental and/or homeownership.
I.6.b
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: PIP Grant Application (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP) Jurisdiction Name Eligible Base Award
Geographic Category Bonus Award Amount:
Prohousing Designation Application
Score Total Award37 1,120,000$
Award Amount
Moreno Valley 750,000$
Southern California
Click the dropdown menu to choose a jurisdiction. The geographic category and base award will auto-populate. If the jurisdiction has obtained Prohousing Designation at the time of PIP application submittal, enter in the Prohousing Designation applicant score. Population projections are based on the Department of Finance E-1 Jan 1, 2023 estimates. https://dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/estimates-e1/ 370,000$
I.6.b
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: PIP Grant Application (6563 : Prohousing Incentive Program PIP)
Report to City Council
ID#6557 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Launa Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer
AGENDA DATE: March 5, 2024
TITLE: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE
NO. 1007, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
FOR THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023 -01 (PUBLIC SAFETY
SERVICES)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:
1. Conduct the second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 1007.
SUMMARY
This item is the second reading of the Ordinance to designate the Future Annexation Area for Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 Public Safety Services (the “District”).
The Ordinance was introduced at the February 20, 2024 City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
On November 21, 2023, the City Council established CFD No. 2023 -01 (Public Safety Services), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”) . The District provides the development community with an alternative funding tool to satisfy conditions of approval related to public safety services funding.
To annex into the District, the Act requires the Council first adopt a resolution of intention to annex territory. Between 30 -60 days thereafter, a Public Hearing is held, and property owner ballot counted to determine whether the property owner has authorized annexation of their property into the District and the annual levy of a special tax, collected on the property tax bill, to provide the public safety services funding.
I.7
Packet Pg. 138
The Act authorizes the Council to designate a future annexation area, which streamlines the annexation process . With a designated future annexation area, annexations to the District can be completed in the future, without public hearings, “upon the unanimous approval of the owner o r owners of each parcel or parcels at the time that the parcel or parcels are annexed.”
On January 16, 2024, the Council adopted a Resolution of Intent to initiate the process of designating the entire City as a future annexation area . On February 20, 2024, an Ordinance was introduced as part of the process. Provided the Council approves tonight’s item, the Ordinance will become effective in 30 days , allowing developing property owners to use the streamlined annexation process as early as the April 16, 2024, City Council meeting.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Conduct the second reading by title only and adopt the Ordinance. Staff recommends this alternative since it will streamline the annexation process for property owners.
2. Provide revisions to the Ordinance and direct staff to restart the adoption process. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it will delay implementation of the streamlined annexation process.
3. Do not adopt the Ordinance. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it may delay the development community from satisfying their conditions of approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
Third party costs associated with designation of the Future Annexation Area are projected at $ 5,000 for special legal counsel, legal notice publication costs, recording costs, and other related expenses. Sufficient funds exist in the FY 202 3/24 adopted operating budget, Fund 2006-30-79-25701, Special Districts Administrative to fund the costs.
NOTIFICATION
The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Department Head Approval:
Felicia London Launa Jimenez
Special Districts Division Manager Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
I.7
Packet Pg. 139
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life
6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.
Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.
ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.
1. MoVal CFD 2023-01 FAA Ordinance - Final
APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 2/27/24 7:18 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .
City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 2/28/24 8:53 AM I.7
Packet Pg. 140
1 Ordinance No. 1007
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
ORDINANCE NO. 1007
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR
FUTURE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY FOR THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2023-01 (PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES)
The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley , California, the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2023 -01 (Public Safety Services), does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS:
A. The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”) authorizes the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley (the “City Council”) to establish a community facilities district to finance certain public safety services within the district.
B. Section 53339.7(a) of the Act authorizes the City Council, following a properly noticed public hearing, to provide for the future annexation of territory to a community facilities district. Such designation permits the annexation of a territory within the future annexation area , without additional hearings, upon the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of each parcel or parcels at the time that the parcel or parcels are annexed.
C. By its Resolution No. 2023-82, adopted on November 21, 2023, the City Council established its City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) (the “CFD”).
D. By its Ordinance No. 1004, adopted on December 5, 2023 (the “Special Tax Ordinance”), the City Council levied an annual special tax (the “Special Tax”) pursuant to Section 53340 of the Act against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD.
E. By its Resolution No. 2024-01, adopted on January 16, 2024 (the “Resolution of Intention”), the City Council declared its intention to provide for future annexation of territory to the CFD.
F. The proposed future annexation area, which constitutes the entire territory of the City aside from the territory currently constituting the CFD, is shown on the map titled “Annexation Map No. 2 of Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) of City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California (Territory proposed for annexation in the future, with the condition that parcels within that territory may be annexed only with the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of each parcel or parcels at the time that parcel or those parcels are annexed)” ( the “Annexation Map”). The I.7.a
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: MoVal CFD 2023-01 FAA Ordinance - Final [Revision 1] (6557 : SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1007, AN
2 Ordinance No. 1007
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Annexation Map is recorded as Instrument No. 2024-0017904 in Book 92 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 55, in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection, and incorporated herein by reference.
G. On February 20, 2024, at 6:00 PM (or as soon thereafter as practical), in the City Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California 92553, the City Council held a full and fair public hearing (the “Hearing”) on the designation of the territory shown on Annexation Map No. 2 for annexation to the CFD in the future.
H. Notice of the Hearing was published pursuant to Section 53339.4 of the Act in the February 8, 2024, edition of The Press-Enterprise.
I. At the Hearing, the City Council heard oral and written testimony from all those wishing to provide such testimony. There was no majority protest (as defined by Section 53339.6 of the Act) against the proposed addition of territory to the CFD in the future.
J. City Council now desires to provide for the future annexation of territory to the CFD and to take other related actions.
SECTION 2. PROVISION FOR ANNEXATION IN THE FUTURE:
The City Council hereby provides for the annexation to the CFD of the territory shown on Annexation Map No. 2 upon the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of each parcel or parcels at the time that the parcel or parcels are annexed, without additional hearings.
SECTION 3. EFFECT OF ANNEXATION:
Upon annexation, annexed territory shall be subject to the special tax imposed by the Special Tax Ordinance . This Ordinance does not change the rate and method of apportionment of such tax, and each parcel in the CFD (including each annexed parcel) shall be subject to a tax up to, but no higher than , the maximum rate for that parcel as set forth in the Special Tax Ordinance. Aside from permitting annexation of territory, this Ordinance does not alter any of the provisions of the Special Tax Ordinance, which is incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase I.7.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: MoVal CFD 2023-01 FAA Ordinance - Final [Revision 1] (6557 : SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1007, AN
3 Ordinance No. 1007
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phases hereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 5. NOTICE OF ADOPTION:
Within fifteen days after the date of adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in three public places within the city.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE:
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March 2024.
_________________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
City Attorney
I.7.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: MoVal CFD 2023-01 FAA Ordinance - Final [Revision 1] (6557 : SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1007, AN
4 Ordinance No. 1007
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
ORDINANCE JURAT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, Jane Halstead, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1007 had its first reading on February 20, 2024 and had its second reading on March 5, 2024, and was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of March, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
______________________________________
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I.7.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: MoVal CFD 2023-01 FAA Ordinance - Final [Revision 1] (6557 : SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1007, AN
Report to City Council
ID#6551 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of the
Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Launa Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer
AGENDA DATE: March 5, 2024
TITLE: PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX
CERTAIN PARCELS INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) -
AMENDMENT NOS. 132, 141, 143 -144, 149, 151, 152 AND
154 (RESO. NOS. CSD 2024-__ TO CSD 2024-__)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:
1. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 132) (Shinder K. Kaur and Parmjit Singh , located at the southeast corner of Alessandro Blvd. and Redlands Blvd.).
2. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 202 4-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 1 41) (Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez , located at 25052 Fir Ave.).
3. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 202 4-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 143) (Gustavo C. Hernandez Linares and Suzanna A. Gonzalez, located at 16430 Quarter Horse Rd.).
I.8
Packet Pg. 145
4. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 202 4-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 144) ( Daisy Gomez , located at 25844 Rancho Lucero Dr.).
5. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024 -__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 149) ( Rodolfo Arellano and Maria Efren Gonzalez Araiza located at 25271 Oakstone Ct.).
6. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024 -__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 151) ( Marlene Ortega , located at 24880 Eugena Ave.).
7. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 202 4-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 152) ( Melad Samuel Kelada Living Trust DTD 7/13/22 and Melad Samuel Kelada, located at 16829 Trinity Bay Ct.).
8. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024 -__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley , California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 154) ( Carlos E. and Elvia Cobian , located at 14799 Silvertree Rd.).
SUMMARY
Adoption of the resolution s (Attachments 1-8) will certify the annexation of 10 parcels into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2021-01 ( Parks Maintenance) (“District”).
This action impacts only the property owners identified below, not the general citizens or taxpayers of the City.
DISCUSSION
As a condition of approval for the development projects identified below, the applicants I.8
Packet Pg. 146
are required to provide an ongoing funding source for maintenance of certain public facilities (e.g., parks). The funding is used to mitigate the cost of the impacts creat ed by the proposed development.
Property Owner
Project
ACP Record #s
Amendment
No. APN(s) Location
Shinder K. Kaur and Parmjit Singh
Commercial Center & Gas Station
PEN19-0057/SCP22-0046
132
478-430-029
478-430-031
478-430-032
Southeast corner of Alessandro
Blvd. and Redlands Blvd.
Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR-23-0181/SCP23-0073
141 479-040-038 25052 Fir Ave.
Gustavo C. Hernandez Linares
and Suzanna A. Gonzalez
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0193/SCP23-0078
143 308-414-002 16430 Quarter Horse Rd.
Daisy Gomez
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0140/SCP23-0071
144 486-141-026 25844 Rancho Lucero Dr.
Rodolfo Arellano and
Maria Efren Gonzalez Araiza
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0186/SCP24-0001
149 484-134-004 25271 Oakstone Ct.
Marlene Ortega
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0154/SCP24-0004
151 482-201-011 24880 Eugena Ave.
Melad Samuel Kelada
Living Trust DTD 7/13/22
and Melad Samuel Kelada
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0109/SCP24-0008
152 316-141-019 16829 Trinity Bay Ct.
Carlos E. and Elvia Cobian
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0103/SCP23-0077
154 482-421-011 14799 Silvertree Rd.
On June 1, 2021, the CSD Board formed CFD No. 2021 -01, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. The District was created to provide the development community with an alternative funding tool to mitigate the impacts of their proposed development. If a property owner elects to annex the parcels of their development into the District, they also authorize the CSD to annually levy a special tax, collected on the annual property tax bill, against property in the development project. Thus, satisfying the condition of approval.
On December 21, 2021 , the CSD Board adopted Ordinance No. 56, which designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the District. With the future annexation area designated, annexations can occur without an additional public hearing as long as the annexing landowner provides unanimous consent. Once annexed, I.8
Packet Pg. 147
parcels are subject to the annual special tax to fund the service they are receiving.
An applicant has two options to satisfy the condition(s) of approval:
1. The property owner s ubmits a Landowner Petition unanimously approving annexation of the property into the District. Approval of the petition and special tax rate allows the City to annually levy the special tax on the property tax bill of the property. This option is only available if there are fewer than 12 registered voters living within the proposed annexation area; or
2. The applicant funds an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation and provides for the ongoing operation and maintenance of parks facilities.
The Property Owners listed above elected to annex their property into CFD No. 2021-01 and have the special tax applied to the annual property tax bill. The Office of the Riverside County Registrar of Voters confirmed the number of registered voters residing at each property, allowing a special election of the landowner. Adoption of the resolutions (Attachments 1-8) amends the District and adds the property to the tax rate area identified in the Fiscal Impact section of this report . The resolutions also direct the recordation of the boundary map s (Attachments 9-16) and amended notice of special tax lien s for the amendments. The Election Official confirmed the Property Owner s unanimously approved the annexation of their property into the District (Attachments 17- 24).
ALTERNATIVES
1. Adopt the resolutions. Staff recommends this alternative since it will annex the propert ies into CFD No. 2021-01 at the request of the Property Owners and satisfy the condition of approval for the proposed developments.
2. Do not adopt the resolution s. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it is contrary to the request of the Property Owner s, will not satisfy the condition of approval, and may delay development of the projects.
3. Do not adopt the resolution s but rather continue the item to a future regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the Property Owner s from satisfying the condition of approval and may delay development of the projects.
FISCAL IMPACT
Revenue received from the special tax is restricted and can only be used to fund the I.8
Packet Pg. 148
services for each tax rate area within the District. The special tax can only be applied to a property tax bill of a parcel wherein the qualified electors (i.e., landowners or registered voters, depending upon the number of registered voters) have previously provided approval. If the projected revenue from the maximum special tax exceeds what is necessary to fund the services within the tax rate area, a lower amount will be applied to the property tax bill for all of the properties within the affected tax rate area. The maximum special tax rates are detailed below.
Property Owner
Project
ACP Record #s
Amendment
No. Property Type
FY 2023/24
Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Shinder K. Kaur and Parmjit Singh
Commercial Center & Gas Station
PEN19-0057/SCP22-0046
132 Commercial $21.49/1,000 feet of
building square footage
Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0181/SCP23-0073
141 Single Family $335.22/unit
Gustavo C. Hernandez Linares
and Suzanna A. Gonzalez
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0193/SCP23-0078
143 Single Family $335.22/unit
Daisy Gomez
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0140/SCP23-0071
144 Single Family $335.22/unit
Rodolfo Arellano and
Maria Efren Gonzalez Araiza
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0186/SCP24-0001
149 Single Family $335.22/unit
Marlene Ortega
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0154/SCP24-0004
151 Single Family $335.22/unit
Melad Samuel Kelada
Living Trust DTD 7/13/22
and Melad Samuel Kelada
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0109/SCP24-0008
152 Single Family $335.22/unit
Carlos E. and Elvia Cobian
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
BFR23-0103/SCP23-0077
154 Single Family $335.22/unit
The maximum special tax rate is subject to an annual inflation adjustment based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or five percent (5%), whichever is greater.
However, the annual adjustment cannot be applied unless the CSD Board annually authorizes such adjustment. The increase to the maximum special tax rate cannot exceed the annual inflationary adjustment without a two -thirds approval of the qualified electors within the affected tax rate area.
I.8
Packet Pg. 149
NOTIFICATION
Subject Landowner Petitions were emailed to Property Owner s on 12/4/23, 1/24/24, 2/8/24 and 2/12/24.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Department Head Approval:
Isa Rojas Launa Jimenez
Management Analyst Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
Concurred by:
Felicia London
Special Districts Division Manager
Concurred by:
Jeremy Bubnick
Parks & Community Services Director
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life
6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.
Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.
ATTACHMENTS
I.8
Packet Pg. 150
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.
1. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132
2. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141
3. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143
4. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144
5. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149
6. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151
7. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152
8. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154
9. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 141
10. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 132
11. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 143
12. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 144
13. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 149
14. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 151
15. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 152
16. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 154
17. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 132
18. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 141
19. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 143
20. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 144
21. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 149
22. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 151
23. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 152
24. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 154
APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 2/27/24 7:52 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .
City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 2/28/24 8:58 AM I.8
Packet Pg. 151
1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcels listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcels (the “Annexation Parcels”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcels are comprised of the territory shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 132 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcels to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcels are hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and are subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcels associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provision s, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcels
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
132
478-430-029
478-430-031
478-430-032
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.a
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 141 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provision s, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
141 479-040-038
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.b
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 143 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
143 308-414-002
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.c
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 144 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
144 486-141-026
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.d
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 149 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
149 484-134-004
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.e
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 151 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
151 482-201-011
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.f
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 152 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provision s, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
152 316-141-019
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.g
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITOR Y TO MORENO VALLEY
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP
FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021 -01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non -exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, h as submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territor y shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 154 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 20 21-01 (Parks Maintenance ), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California ” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution , and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correctand are herein incorporated.
2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.
3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.
Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.
Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to suc h services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.
4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.
5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.
6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.
7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.
8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley ,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
154 482-421-011
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: March 5, 2024
EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.8.h
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 141 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01(PARKS MAINTENANCE)MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCITY OF MORENO VALLEYCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDESTATE OF CALIFORNIA Legend± ¬«60
I.8.i
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, S H E E T 1 O F 1
2 7 3 6 8 V i a I n d u s t r i a , S u i t e 2 0 0 T e m e c u l a , C A 9 2 5 9 0
( 9 5 1 ) 5 8 7 - 3 5 0 0
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 132 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01
(PARKS MAINTENANCE)
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
F I L E D I N T H E O F F I C E O F T H E C I T Y C L E R K O F T H E C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y T H I S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2 0 _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C I T Y C L E R K O F T H E C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y , A C T I N G I N T H E C A P A C I T Y O F T H E S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H E W I T H I N M A P S H O W I N G A M E N D E D B O U N D A R I E S O F C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 1 ( P A R K S M A I N T E N A N C E ) , O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T , C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y , C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A , W A S A P P R O V E D B Y T H E B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T A T A R E G U L A R M E E T I N G T H E R E O F , H E L D O N T H E _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2 0 _ _ _ B Y I T S R E S O L U T I O N N O . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C I T Y C L E R K O F T H E C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y , A C T I N G I N T H E C A P A C I T Y O F T H E S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T F I L E D T H I S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2 0 _ _ _ , A T T H E H O U R O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O ' C L O C K _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M . I N T H E B O O K _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ P A G E ( S ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O F M A P S O F A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T S A S I N S T R U M E N T N O . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I N T H E O F F I C E O F T H E C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R O F T H E C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R
C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E
S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A
R E F E R E N C E I S M A D E T O T H A T B O U N D A R Y M A P O F T H E C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 1 ( P A R K S M A I N T E N A N C E ) O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T , R E C O R D E D W I T H T H E R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R ' S O F F I C E O N M A Y 4 , 2 0 2 1 I N B O O K 8 6 O F M A P S O F A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T S , P A G E 9 5 A S I N S T R U M E N T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 2 8 0 0 0 4 . R E F E R E N C E I S F U R T H E R M A D E T O A N N E X A T I O N M A P N O . 4 O F C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 1 ( P A R K S M A I N T E N A N C E ) O F T H E M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T , C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y , C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A ( T E R R I T O R Y P R O P O S E D F O R A N N E X A T I O N I N T H E F U T U R E , W I T H T H E C O N D I T I O N T H A T P A R C E L S W I T H I N T H A T T E R R I T O R Y M A Y B E A N N E X E D O N L Y W I T H T H E U N A N I M O U S A P P R O V A L O F T H E O W N E R O R O W N E R S O F E A C H P A R C E L O R P A R C E L S A T T H E T I M E T H A T P A R C E L O R T H O S E P A R C E L S A R E A N N E X E D ) R E C O R D E D W I T H T H E R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R S O F F I C E O N O C T O B E R 2 7 , 2 0 2 1 I N B O O K 8 7 , P A G E 8 1 O F M A P S O F A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T S A S I N S T R U M E N T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 6 3 5 7 4 2 W H I C H D E S I G N A T E D T H E T E R R I T O R Y S H O W N H E R E I N A S T E R R I T O R Y F O R F U T U R E A N N E X A T I O N T O T H E C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T R E F E R E N C E D T H E R E O N . F O R P A R T I C U L A R S O F T H E L I N E S A N D D I M E N S I O N S O F A S S E S S O R P A R C E L S , R E F E R E N C E I S M A D E T O T H E M A P S O F T H E A S S E S S O R , C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A . T H E R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y A S S E S S O R ' S M A P S S H A L L G O V E R N F O R A L L D E T A I L S C O N C E R N I N G T H E L I N E S A N D D I M E N S I O N S O F S U C H L O T S O R P A R C E L S .
M A L T B Y A V E
R E D L A N D S B L V D
K I M B E R L Y A V E
A L E S S A N D R O B L V D
Legend
A n n e x a t i o n P a r c e l
S u r r o u n d i n g A r e a P a r c e l s 1 i n c h = 8 5 f e e t B R O D I A E A A V E
W
O R L D L O G I S T I C S C E N T E R P K W
Y
M
O R E N O B E A C H D R
C O T T O N W O O D A V E
R E D L A N D S B L V D
A L E S S A N D R O B L V D
S I T E
¯
478-430-029
( T H I S M A P A M E N D S , B Y A D D I N G T H E A D D I T I O N A L T E R R I T O R Y S H O W N H E R E O N , T H E B O U N D A R Y M A P F O R M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y S E R V I C E S D I S T R I C T C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T N O . 2 0 2 1 - 0 1 ( P A R K S M A I N T E N A N C E ) , C I T Y O F M O R E N O V A L L E Y , R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A , P R I O R R E C O R D E D A T B O O K 8 6 O F M A P S O F A S S E S S M E N T A N D C O M M U N I T Y F A C I L I T I E S D I S T R I C T S A T P A G E 9 5 , I N T H E O F F I C E O F T H E C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R F O R T H E C O U N T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A . ) 478-430-032
478-430-031
I.8.j
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-0)
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 143 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01(PARKS MAINTENANCE)MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCITY OF MORENO VALLEYCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDESTATE OF CALIFORNIA Legend±
I.8.k
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS,
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 144 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01(PARKS MAINTENANCE)MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCITY OF MORENO VALLEYCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDESTATE OF CALIFORNIA Legend±
I.8.l
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, SHEET 1 OF 1
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
T emecula, CA 92590
(951) 587-3500
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 149 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01
(PARKS MAINTENANCE)
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(THIS MAP AMENDS, BY ADDING THE ADDITIONAL TERRITORY SHOWN HEREON, THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRIOR RECORDED AT BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE 95, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.) FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY , COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE __________ DAY OF _______________________, 20______ BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. __________________.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FILED THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___, AT THE HOUR OF ____________ O'CLOCK _______ M. IN THE BOOK _________ PAGE(S) ___________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
COUNTY RECORDER
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE IS MADE TO THAT BOUNDARY MAP OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ON MAY 4, 2021 IN BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, PAGE 95 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0280004.
REFERENCE IS FURTHER MADE TO ANNEXATION MAP NO. 4 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021- 01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION IN THE
FUTURE, WITH THE CONDITION THAT PARCELS WITHIN THE TERRITORY MAY BE ANNEXED ONLY WITH THE
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF EACH PARCEL OR PARCELS AT THE TIME THAT PARCEL OR THOSE PARCELS ARE ANNEXED) RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE ON OCTOBER 27, 2021 IN BOOK 87, PAGE 81 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0635742 WHICH DESIGNATED THE TERRITORY SHOWN HEREIN AS TERRITORY FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REFERENCED THEREON.
FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH LOTS OR PARCELS.
CACTUS AVE
PARKWOOD CT
WOODPARK DR
FARMWOOD DR
OAKS
TONE
CT
MINNE
TONKA CT
KITCHING ST
RIO BRAVO RD
COCHITI DR
WOO
DCRE
EK
CT
Legend
Annexation Parcel
Surrounding Area Parcels
±
1 inch = 100 feet
484-
134-
004
BRO
DIAEA
AVE
PERRIS BLVD
CACT
US AVE
LASSELLE ST
KITCHING ST
SITE
I.8.m
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS,
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 151 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01(PARKS MAINTENANCE)MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTCITY OF MORENO VALLEYCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDESTATE OF CALIFORNIA Legend±
482-201-011
I.8.n
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, SHEET 1 OF 1
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
T emecula, CA 92590
(951) 587-3500
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 152 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01
(PARKS MAINTENANCE)
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(THIS MAP AMENDS, BY ADDING THE ADDITIONAL TERRITORY SHOWN HEREON, THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRIOR RECORDED AT BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE 95, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.) FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY , COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE __________ DAY OF _______________________, 20______ BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. __________________.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FILED THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___, AT THE HOUR OF ____________ O'CLOCK _______ M. IN THE BOOK _________ PAGE(S) ___________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
COUNTY RECORDER
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE IS MADE TO THAT BOUNDARY MAP OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ON MAY 4, 2021 IN BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, PAGE 95 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0280004.
REFERENCE IS FURTHER MADE TO ANNEXATION MAP NO. 4 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021- 01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION IN THE
FUTURE, WITH THE CONDITION THAT PARCELS WITHIN THE TERRITORY MAY BE ANNEXED ONLY WITH THE
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF EACH PARCEL OR PARCELS AT THE TIME THAT PARCEL OR THOSE PARCELS ARE ANNEXED) RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE ON OCTOBER 27, 2021 IN BOOK 87, PAGE 81 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0635742 WHICH DESIGNATED THE TERRITORY SHOWN HEREIN AS TERRITORY FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REFERENCED THEREON.
FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH LOTS OR PARCELS.
INDIAN ST
PERRIS VALLEY CHANNEL
SU
PERI
OR AVE
HUDSON BAY DR
BALTIC CT
TRINITY BAY CT
FORTUNE BAY LN
MARIPOSA
AVE
Legend
Annexation Parcel
Surrounding Area Parcels
City Boundaries
±
1 inch = 125 feet
316-141-
019
PERRIS VALLEY CHANNEL
IRI
S AVE
LASSELL
E ST
HEACOCK ST
PERRIS BLVD
INDIAN ST
KITCHING ST
KRAMERIA AVE
SITE
I.8.o
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, SHEET 1 OF 1
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
T emecula, CA 92590
(951) 587-3500
VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 154 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01
(PARKS MAINTENANCE)
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(THIS MAP AMENDS, BY ADDING THE ADDITIONAL TERRITORY SHOWN HEREON, THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRIOR RECORDED AT BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE 95, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.) FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY , COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE __________ DAY OF _______________________, 20______ BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. __________________.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FILED THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___, AT THE HOUR OF ____________ O'CLOCK _______ M. IN THE BOOK _________ PAGE(S) ___________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
COUNTY RECORDER
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE IS MADE TO THAT BOUNDARY MAP OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ON MAY 4, 2021 IN BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, PAGE 95 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0280004.
REFERENCE IS FURTHER MADE TO ANNEXATION MAP NO. 4 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021- 01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION IN THE
FUTURE, WITH THE CONDITION THAT PARCELS WITHIN THE TERRITORY MAY BE ANNEXED ONLY WITH THE
UNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF EACH PARCEL OR PARCELS AT THE TIME THAT PARCEL OR THOSE PARCELS ARE ANNEXED) RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE ON OCTOBER 27, 2021 IN BOOK 87, PAGE 81 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0635742 WHICH DESIGNATED THE TERRITORY SHOWN HEREIN AS TERRITORY FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REFERENCED THEREON.
FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAPS OF THE ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCH LOTS OR PARCELS.
WINTERGREEN ST
INDIAN ST
JOHN F
KENNE
DY DR
MORN
ING GLORY
ST
FE
RND
ELL ST
PERHAM DRCOMFORT CT
BLUEBERRY RD
SUN
VA
LLEY R
D
SILV
ERTR
EE
RD
BLUEGRAS
S CT
CLIFFROSE
CT
DEL
PHINIUM
AV
E
CLOVERFIELD RD
Legend
Annexation Parcel
Surrounding Area Parcels
City Boundaries
±
1 inch = 125 feet
482-421-
011
DELP
HI
NI
UM AVE
CAC
TUS AV
E
JO
HN
F KENNE
DY
DR
INDIAN ST
PERRIS BLVD
HEACOCK ST
KITCHING ST
SITE
I.8.p
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, I.8.q
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 132 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.r
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 141 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.s
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 143 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.t
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 144 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.u
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 149 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.v
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 151 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.w
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 152 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS I.8.x
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 154 (6551 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITIONS, ANNEX CERTAIN PARCELS
Report to City Council
ID#6560 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of the
Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services Director
AGENDA DATE: March 5, 2024
TITLE: APPROVE NAMING OF NEW PARK (TRACT 38123)
LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF ALESSANDRO
BOULEVARD AND DARWIN DRIVE
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation: That the City Council and CSD:
1. Approve the naming of the new park located on the corner of Alessandro Boulevard and Darwin Drive.
SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of naming the new park located on the corner of Alessandro Boulevard and Darwin Drive (Tract 38123). The 1.85-acre park site is in the Windsong development. Based on its location and in line with the City’s Park Naming Policy, it is recommended that the new park be named Windsong Park.
DISCUSSION
The City’s Park Naming Policy was created to facilitate the process of naming new parks constructed within our city. Some of the criteria for the selection of names includes naming parks after a dedicated City Street, avenue, or boulevard. If a park is located adjacent to a school site, the park may bear the same name as the school.
Additionally, a park may be named after a housing tract that the project is located within.
The new 1.85-acre park site is in the Windsong development and based on the location, the park name of “Windsong Park” is being recommended.
I.9
Packet Pg. 216
The neighborhood park will include amenities such as play structures, picnic shelters, BBQs, a walking trail, open turf, shade structures, fitness stations, and a parking lot.
The Parks, Community Services and Trails Committee made a recommendation at their regular meeting held on February 1, 2024, to name the new park site Windsong Park.
Additionally, the Parks and Community Services Subcommittee also recommended the new park site be named Windsong Park during their meeting held on February 6, 2024.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the naming of the park site as recommended by this report.
2. Do not approve the name as recommended and provide an alternative name for the park.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
NOTIFICATION
Posting of Agenda.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:
Patty Yhuit Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Admin & Fin Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life
6. Youth Programs
I.9
Packet Pg. 217
ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.
1. Park Naming Policy_2.02
2. Windsong Park_2022-0913 Tr 38123 Community Park-Enlargement 24x36_revised
APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 2/27/24 7:22 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .
City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 2/28/24 8:49 AM I.9
Packet Pg. 218
City of Moreno Valley General Management
Policy # 2.02
PARK NAMING POLICY
Approved by: City Council
September 3, 1991
Revised June 4, 2019
PURPOSE: The rapid development of the City of Moreno Valley's park system will afford an exciting opportunity to appropriately name each new park/facility that is constructed within our City. To facilitate this process, the following guidelines have been adopted.
POLICY:
I. Approval of Name:
A. Public participation in the name selection process will be encouraged.
B. Proposed names for parks and recreation facilities will be solicited by staff and submitted to the Parks, Community Services and Trails Committee for review and approval.
C. After approval of the Parks, Community Services and Trails Committee, the proposed name(s) will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and approval.
II. Criteria for Selection of Names:
A. The park/facility may be named after a dedicated City street, avenue, or boulevard.
B. The park/facility may be named after a housing tract that the project is located within.
C. If the park/facility is located adjacent to a school site, the park may bear the same name as the school.
D. A park/facility may be named after various significant or historical features that are unique to Moreno Valley, i.e. geographical features, historical events, native birds and/or wildlife, etc.
E. Although there are many fine individuals both living and deceased who have made significant contributions to the development of the City of Moreno Valley, it shall be the policy of the Parks , Community Services and Trails Committee to not consider naming parks in honor of individual persons. Consideration may be given to naming buildings and/or other facilities in honor of individual persons.
I.9.a
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Park Naming Policy_2.02 (6560 : APPROVE NAMING OF NEW PARK LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF ALESSANDRO BOULEVARD A/C
A/CA/C
A/C
A/C
A/C
12% 8:1 MAX5% MAXPA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PA
PA
PA
8 : &21&5(7( :A/.:A<
&21&5(7( :A/.:A<
&21&5(7( :A/.:A<
&21&5(7( :A/.:A<6+A'( 6758&785( :%%4 P,&1,& 7A%/(6
(175< M218M(17'* P,&1,& A5(A
6+A'( 6758&785( :%%4 P,&1,& 7A%/(6
%(1&+ 6(A7,1* :&2MPA1,21 6PA&(),71(66 67A7,216
A&7,9( 785) A5(A
%,.( 5A&. '* P,&1,& A5(A
'5,1.,1* )2817A,1
PA66,9( 785) A5(APA66,9(785) A5(APA66,9(785) A5(A
PA66,9(785) A5(A
25 A*( 727 /27 :,7+,1&/86,9( 727 6:,1*A1' 6P5,1* 5,'(5 512 A*(P/A<*5281':,7+*528P6P5,1*A1' 62/26P,11(56 P/A<*5281' A'A5AMP P/A<*5281'(1*,1((5(' :22'),%(5
'2* :A67( P(7 67A7,21
PA5.,1* /27:A'A PA5.,1* 6PA&(6
0'20'40'60' NORTH
I.9.b
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Windsong Park_2022-0913 Tr 38123 Community Park-Enlargement 24x36_revised (6560 : APPROVE NAMING OF NEW PARK LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF ALESSANDRO BOULEVARD AND DARWIN DRIVE)
Report to City Council
ID#6558 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean P. Kelleher, Acting Assistant City Manager / C.D.
Director
AGENDA DATE: March 5, 2024
TITLE: HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF
IRIS AND GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2024 -XX: a) CERTIFYING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment (PEN22 -0159), Change of Zone (PEN22 -0158), Tentative Tract Map 38458 (PEN22 -0156) and Conditional Use Permit (PEN22 -0157) on file with the Community Development Department, incorporated herein by this reference, which was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and establishing that the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and that the document reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and b) ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the above-referenced Mitigated Negative Declaration (Project #1, South of Iris, Heritage Park Neighborhood I); and
2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2024 -XX: a) CERTIFYING the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared for General Plan Amendment (PEN23 -0072), Change of Zone (PEN23 -0071), Tentative Tract Map 38702 (PEN23 -0069), and Conditional Use Permit (PEN23 -0070), on file with the Community Development Department, incorporated herein by this reference which was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and establishing that the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and that the document reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and b) ADOPTING the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the above-referenced Mitigated Negative Declaration (Project #2, Goya at Heritage J.1
Packet Pg. 221
Park, Heritage Park Neighborhood II); and
3. ADOPT Resolution 2024 -XX APPROVING a single General Plan Amendment comprised of PEN22 -0159 and PEN23 -0072, based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record and Findings as set forth in the Resolution, which amends the Moreno Valley General Plan Land Use map, as described in the Resolution and shown in the revised Land Use Exhibits for PEN22-0159 (Project #1, South of Iris, Heritage Park Neighborhood I) and PEN23-0072 (Project #2, Goya at Heritage Park, Heritage Park Neighborhood II); and
Project #1, South of Iris, Heritage Park Neighborhood I
4. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. XXX and conduct the first reading by title only approving Change of Zone (PEN22 -0158) to amend the City Zoning Atlas based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Ordinance No. XXX; and
5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2024 -XX approving Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0157), and Tentative Tract Map 38458 (PEN22 -0156) based on the Findings contained in this Resolution, and subject to the Conditions of Approval included as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively; and
6. SCHEDULE the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. XXX and Ordinance No. XXX for the next regular City Council meeting.
Project #2, Goya at Heritage Park, Heritage Park Neighborhood II
7. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. XXX and conduct the first reading by title only approving Change of Zone (PEN23 -0071) to amend the City Zoning Atlas based on the Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Records and Findings as set forth in Ordinance No. XXX; and
8. ADOPT Resolution No. 2024 -XX approving Conditional Use Permit (PEN23-0070), and Tentative Tract Map 38702 (PEN23 -0069) based on the Findings contained in this Resolution, and subject to the Conditions of Approval included as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively; and
9. SCHEDULE the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. XXX and Ordinance No. XXX for the next regular City Council meeting.
SUMMARY
This staff report recommends approval of development applications for two projects for Heritage Park Neighborhoods I and II: Project 1, South of Iris Planned Unit Development for a 78 -unit single -family development Planned Unit Development located on the south side of Iris Avenue east of Indian Street, and Project 2, Goya at Heritage Park, a 131 -unit single -family Planned Unit Development located on the J.1
Packet Pg. 222
southeast corner of Goya Avenue and Indian Street.
The recommended actions for Project 1 include approval of a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit for a residential Planned Unit Development, and Tentative Tract Map 38458; and Project 2 includes approval of a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit for a residential Planned Unit Development, and Tentative Tract Map 38702.
As provided for in the State Government Code, a mandatory element of the General Plan may be amended no more than four times during one calendar year. However, each amendment may include more than one change to a General Plan element. The recommended action is for the City Council to approve and adopt one General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element covering both land use designation changes for Projects 1 and 2. This unified change will be the first amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the 2024 calendar year.
DISCUSSION
PROJECT 1, SOUTH OF IRIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Advisory Board/Commission Recommendation
At its February 8, 2024, meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-1 to recommend that the City Council certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program, and approve the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development and Tentative Tract Map 38458.
Project
The Applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1) a General Plan Amendment (PEN22-0159), to change the General Plan land use designation of the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10), 2) a Change of Zone (PEN22 -0158) to change the City Zoning Atlas pertaining to the South of Iris Planned Unit Development Community from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, 3) a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38458) to subdivide the 9.42 -acre Project site into seventy-eight (78) single family lots, and 4) a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development with associated amenities, public improvements and privately maintained, publicly available tot lots and dog parks.
General Plan Amendment
The General Plan Amendment (PEN22 -0159) is a request for approval to change the General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project Site from R5 Residential to R10 Residential to provide for a variety of residential products and to encourage innovation in housing types. Developments within R10 Residential areas are typically expected to provide amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions, such as common open space and recreational areas. The maximum allowable density for the R10 Residential J.1
Packet Pg. 223
Land Use Designation is 10.0 dwelling units per acre. The Proposed Project with 78 detached single -family residences on the subject 9.42 -acre Project Site provides a density of 8.28 dwelling units per acre.
Change of Zone
The Change of Zone (PEN22 -0158) is a request for approval to change the Zoning District classification of the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District. The intent of the Residential Single -Family (RS10) District is to provide for residential development on small single -family lots, such as Planned Unit Developments, with amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions. This RS10 District is intended for subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of 10.0 dwelling units per acre.
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
The Conditional Use Permit (PEN22 -0157) is a request for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) comprised of 78 detached single -family residences, a 0.27 -acre, and 0.12-acre publicly accessible tot lot and dog park, a 0.41 -acre retention basin, and the required on -site and off -site improvements. The Planned Unit Development allows for flexible development standards to address the unique characteristics of the Project Site. As required for Planned Unit Developments, Design Guidelines have been prepared for the Proposed Project that establishes the land use regulations, development standards, architectural design standards, and landscaping design guidelines, and includes the dedication and maintenance of permanent open spaces.
The Design Guidelines also provide architectural themes for single -family residences and guidance for the neighborhood entrances and perimeter fencing around the community.
Tentative Tract Map
The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38458 (PEN22 -0156) is a request for approval to subdivide the 9.42 -acre Project Site into 78 single -family residential lots, ranging in size from approximately 2,760 square feet to approximately 3,989 square feet. The average lot size is 3,078 square feet. The subdivision also includes a 0.39-acre privately maintained and publicly accessible tot lot and dog park.
Site and Surrounding Area
The Project Site is currently vacant and unimproved. The property directly to the north, across Iris Avenue, is within the Public Facilities (PC) District and developed with Rainbow Ridge Elementary School. The properties to the east are within the Residential 5 (R5) District and develop ed with single-family residences. The property directly to the south, across Goya Avenue, is vacant and unimproved within the Residential (R5) District, and it is the subject of Neighborhood II of the proposed Heritage Park Project.
The properties to the west are within the Residential (R5) District and developed with single-family residences.
J.1
Packet Pg. 224
Access/Parking
The primary entrances into the Proposed Project are located on Iris Avenue from the north and Goya Avenue from the south. The Proposed Project is a pedestrian-oriented development with interconnecting the neighborhoods w hich include 6.5-foot-wide sidewalks along both sides of the internal streets to encourage physical activity by providing safe and convenient pedestrian access to strategically placed parks within walking distance of the residences.
Each single-family residence has a two -car garage, as required by the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the proposed private street is designed to accommodate parking on both sides.
Design/Landscaping
The PUD incorporates architectural guidelines for the proposed development. The applicant is proposing four (4) two -story floor plans and four (4) exterior elevation designs which include Craftsman, Prairie, Ranch, and Spanish with various color combinations and architectural design elements using stucco, varied siding finishes, stone, and various trim fixtures, and varied rooflines. Additionally, the PUD includes typical plot plan configurations for the homes with typical front yard landscaping.
The Homeowner’s Association shall be required to perform all common area maintenance to ensure a well-maintained appearance of the streetscapes, and common areas including the 0.27-acre tot lot, 0.12-acre dog park, and the retention basin.
ENVIRONMENTAL
An Initial Study was prepared by Ardurra Group and accepted by the Planning Division Staff in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA guidelines. The Initial Study examined the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on the environment. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) serves as the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project. With the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Technical studies prepared in support of the IS/MND include the following: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas and Energy Impact Analysis; Habitat Assessment and Habitat Conservation Plan; Cultural Resources Assessment; Geotechnical Engineering Investigation; Preliminary Hydrology Study; Water Quality Management Plan; Noise Impact Study; Traffic Impact Analysis; Vehicle Miles Traveled Impact Analysis; and Planned Unit Development Design Guidelines. Copies of the appendices to the IS/MND can be accessed from the link attached to this staff report. The documents were made available for public review and inspection at City Hall during operating hours, and online on the City’s website.
Mitigation measures are recommended for the Proposed Project in the following areas:
Air Quality, Biological Resources, and Tribal and Cultural Resources, all of which are incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program (MMRP). The cultural resources measures are intended to ensure that potential resources that might be J.1
Packet Pg. 225
discovered are protected. However, these measures are not required to address a known significant impact. Based on the Initial Study and with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not cause any significant impacts to the environment.
The public comment period for the Notice of Intent to Adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (State Clearinghouse Schedule Number 2023120763) began on December 29, 2023, and ended on January 29, 2024, which satisfies the required 30 - day public review period required for this Proposed Project.
PROJECT 2, GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
DISCUSSION
Advisory Board/Commission Recommendation
At its February 8, 2024, meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-1 to recommend that the City Council certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program, and approve the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development and Tentative Tract Map 38702.
Project
The Applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1) a General Plan Amendment (PEN23-0072), to change the General Plan land use designation of the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) to Residential 10 (R10), 2) a Change of Zone (PEN23 -0071) to change the City Zoning Atlas pertaining to the Goya at Heritage site from the Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, 3) a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PEN23 -0070), and 4) Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38720) to subdivide the 13.73 -acre Project Site into one - hundred thirty one (131) single -family lots, with associated amenities, public improvements and privately maintained and publicly available tot lots and dog parks.
General Plan Amendment
The General Plan Amendment (PEN23 -0072) is a request for approval to change the General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project Site from R5 Residential to R10 Residential to provide for a variety of residential products and to encourage innovation in housing types. Developments within R10 Residential areas are typically expected to provide amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions, such as common open space and recreational areas. The maximum allowable density for the R10 Residential Land Use Designation is 10.0 dwelling units per acre. The Proposed Project with 131 detached single -family residences on the subject 13.73 -acre Project Site provides a density of 9.54 dwelling units per acre.
Change of Zone
The Change of Zone (PEN23 -0071) is a request for approval to change the Zoning J.1
Packet Pg. 226
District classification of the Project Site from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District. The intent of the Residential Single -Family (RS10) District is to provide for residential development on small single -family lots, such as Planned Unit Developments, with amenities not generally found in suburban subdivisions. This RS10 District is intended for subdivisions at a maximum allowable density of 10.0 dwelling units per acre.
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
The Conditional Use Permit (PEN23 -0070) is a request for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) comprised of 131 detached single -family residences, a 0.43 -acre publicly accessible tot lot and dog park, a 0.57 -acre retention basin, and the required on-site and off -site improvements. The Planned Unit Development allows for flexible development standards to address the unique characteristics of the site. As required for Planned Unit Developments, Design Guidelines have been prepared for the Proposed Project that establishes the land use regulations, development standards, architectural design standards, and landscaping design guidelines, and includes the dedication and maintenance of the permanent open spaces. The Design Guidelines also provide architectural themes for single -family residences and guidance for the neighborhood entrances and perimeter fencing around the community.
Tentative Tract Map
The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38702 (PEN23 -0069) is a request for approval to subdivide the 13.73-acre Project Site into 131 single-family residential lots, ranging in size from approximately 2,173 square feet to approximately 4,500 square feet. The average lot size is 2,674 square feet. The subdivision also includes a 0.43-acre privately maintained and publicly accessible tot lot and dog park.
Site and Surrounding Area
The Project Site is currently vacant and unimproved. The properties directly to the north, across Goya Avenue, are within the Residential 5 (R5) District, and these properties are a combination of single-family residences and vacant and unimproved parcels. It should be noted that the property directly to the north of the Project Site is vacant and unimproved and is the subject of Neighborhood I of the proposed Heritage Park Project.
The property directly to the east is within the Residential 5 (R5) District and is also vacant and unimproved. The properties directly to the south are within the Residential (R5) District, and these properties are a combination of single -family residences and vacant and unimproved parcels. The property to the west is within the Industrial District of the Moreno Valley Industrial Plan (Specific Plan 208) and developed with an industrial warehouse.
Access/Parking
The primary entrance into the Proposed Project is located on Goya Avenue, and the secondary entrance is located on Indian Street. The Proposed Project is a pedestrian- oriented development with interconnecting neighborhoods and 6.5-foot-wide sidewalks J.1
Packet Pg. 227
along both sides of the internal streets to encourage physical activity by providing safe and convenient pedestrian access to strategically placed parks within walking distance of the residences.
Each single-family residence has a two -car garage, as required by the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the proposed private streets are designed to accommodate parking on both sides.
Design/Landscaping
The PUD incorporates architectural guidelines for the proposed development. The applicant is proposing three (3) two -story floor plans and four (4) exterior elevation designs which include Craftsman, Prairie, Ranch, and Spanish with various color combinations and architectural design elements using stucco, varied siding finishes, stone, and various trim fixtures, and varied rooflines. Additionally, it includes typical plot plan configurations for the homes with typical front yard landscaping.
The Homeowner’s Association shall be required to perform all common area maintenance to ensure a well-maintained appearance of the streetscapes, and common areas including the 0.43-acre tot lot and dog park, and the retention basin.
Environmental
An Initial Study was prepared by Ardurra Group and accepted by the Planning Division Staff in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA G uidelines. The Initial Study examined the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on the environment. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) serves as the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project. With the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Technical studies prepared in support of the IS/MND include the following: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Analysis; Habitat Assessment and Habitat Conservation Plan; Cultural Resources Assessment; Geotechnical Engineering Investigation; Preliminary Hydrology Study; Water Quality Management Plan; Noise Impact Study; Traffic Impact Analysis; Vehicle Miles Traveled Impact Analysis; and Planned Unit Development Design Guidelines. Copies of the appendices to the IS/MND can be accessed from the link attached to this staff report. The documents were made available for public review and inspection at City Hall during operating hours, and online on the City’s website.
Mitigation measures are recommended for the Proposed Project in the following areas:
Air Quality, Biological Resources, and Tribal and Cultural Resources, all of which are incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program (MMRP). The cultural resources measures are intended to ensure that potential resources that might be discovered are protected. However, these measures are not required to address a known significant impact. Based on the Initial Study and with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not cause any significant impacts to the environment.
J.1
Packet Pg. 228
The public comment period for the Notice of Intent to Adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (State Clearinghouse Schedule Number 2023120766) began on December 29, 2023, and ended on January 29, 2024, which satisfies the required 30 - day public review period required for this Proposed Project.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Conduct a public hearing on Project 1 and Project 2, and take actions to certify the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declarations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Projects 1 and 2, and approve the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 38458, for Project 1 and the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 38702, for Project 2 applications, consistent with the Staff recommendations to the Planning Commission. (Staff recommends this alternative).
2. Conduct a public hearing on Project 1 and Project 2 and approve all Project 1 applications including the General Plan Amendment for Project 1 only but do not approve the applications for Project 2. This would result in the approval of the South of Iris Project only. (Staff does not recommend this alternative).
3. Conduct a public hearing on Project 1 and Project 2 and approve all Project 2 applications including the General Plan Amendment for Project 2 only but do not approve the applications for Project 1. This would result in the approval of The Goya at Heritage project only. (Staff does not recommend this alternative).
4. Conduct public hearings on Project 1 and Project 2, and do not approve the applications for Project 1 or Project 2. (Staff does not recommend this alternative).
FISCAL IMPACT
The development of Project 1 will generate approximately $1,200,000 in one -time Development Impact Fees, based on the July 1, 2023, Development Impact fee rates.
Project 1 will also produce a one-time fees for Public Art and Workforce Development Facilities of approximately $250,000 and $22,500, respectively. The Development Impact Fee amount is subject to change.
The development of Project 2 will generate approximately $2,000,000 in one -time Development Impact Fees, based on the July 1, 2023, Development Impact fee rates.
Project 2 will also produce a one-time fees for Public Art and Workforce Development Facilities of approximately $420,000 and $35,000, respectively. The Development Impact Fee amount is subject to change.
NOTIFICATION
Consistent with the City Municipal Code provisions and applicable law, public notices were sent to all property owners of record within 600 feet of each Project Site, posted J.1
Packet Pg. 229
on the Project Sites, and published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper. Public comments received prior to publication of the report have been attached to this staff report.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:
Oliver Mujica Sean P. Kelleher
Contract Planner Acting Assistant City Manager /
Community Development Director
Concurred By:
Robert Flores
Planning Official
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness . Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life
6. Youth Programs
ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.
1. Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - South of Iris
2. Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - South of Iris
3. Appendix A - Air Quality, GHG & Energy Impact Analysis - South of Iris
4. Appendix B - Habitat Assessment & Habitat Conservation Plan - South of Iris
5. Appendix C - Cultural Resources Survey Report - South of Iris
6. Appendix D - Paleontological Resources Technical Report - South of Iris
7. Appendix E - Geotechnical Engineering Investigation - South of Iris J.1
Packet Pg. 230
8. Appendix F - Water Quality Management Plan - South of Iris
9. Appendix G - Traffic Impact Analysis - South of Iris
10. Appendix H - Noise Study - South of Iris
11. Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris
12. Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris
13. Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND - South of Iris
14. Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - Goya at Heritage Park
15. Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park
16. Appendix A - Air Quality, GHG & Energy Impact Analysis - Goya at Heritage Park
17. Appendix B - Habitat Assessment & Habitat Conservation Plan - Goya at Heritage Park
18. Appendix C - Cultural Resources Assessment - Goya at Heritage Park
19. Appendix D - Geotechnical Engineering Investigation - Goya at Heritage Park
20. Appendix E - Water Quality Management Plan - Goya at Heritage Park
21. Appendix F - Preliminary Hydrology Study - Goya at Heritage Park
22. Appendix G - Traffic Impact Study & VMT Impact Analysis - Goya at Heritage Park
23. Appendix H - Noise Impact - Goya at Heritage Park
24. Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - Goya at Heritage Park
25. Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program - Goya at Heritage Park
26. Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND - Goya at Heritage Park
27. Resolution No. 2024 -XX - General Plan Amendment - South of Iris and Goya at Heritage Park
28. Ordinance No. XXX - Change of Zone - South of Iris
29. Resolution No. 2024 -XX - Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map - South of Iris
30. Ordinance No. XXX - Change of Zone - Goya at Heritage Park
31. Resolution No. 2024-XX - Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map - Goya at Heritage Park
32. Planning Commission Staff Report - South of Iris
33. Planning Commission Staff Report - Goya at Heritage Park
34. PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris and Goya at Heritage Park
35. Project Plans 1 of 3 - South of Iris
36. Project Plans 2 of 3 - South of Iris
37. Project Plans 3 of 3 - South of Iris
38. Project Plans 1 of 3 - Goya at Heritage Park
39. Project Plans 2 of 3 - Goya at Heritage Park
40. Project Plans 3 of 3 - Goya at Heritage Park
41. Public Comments - South of Iris
42. Public Comments - Goya at Heritage Park
J.1
Packet Pg. 231
APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 2/27/24 8:17 AM City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .
City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 2/28/24 8:53 AM J.1
Packet Pg. 232
1 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT ING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PEN22 -0159),
CHANGE OF ZONE (PEN22 -0158), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(PEN22-0157), AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38458 (PEN22-0156) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 78 UNIT DETACHED SINGLE -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IRIS
AVENUE, EAST OF INDIAN STREET (APN: 316-030-002, 018, AND 019) WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and the L ead Agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for local projects that are subject to requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA 1) and CEQA Guidelines2; and
WHEREAS, South of Iris 2021, LLC (consisting of David Patton, Mark Patton, Tracey Duesler, and Michael and Karen Patton) (“Applicant”) has submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment (PEN22- 0159), Change of Zone (PEN22- 0158), Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0157), and Tentative Tract Map 38458 (PEN22-0156) for the development of a 78 unit detached single- family residential project with associated amenities and public improvements (“Proposed Project”) on 9.42 acres located on the south side of Iris Avenue, east of Indian Street (APN: 316 -030-002, 018, and 019) (“Project Site”); and
WHEREAS, Planning Division Staff completed an Initial Study ( “Environmental Assessment”) for the Proposed Project and based on the Environmental Assessment, recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) in accordance with Section 6 (ND Procedures) of the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the requirements of CEQA the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070–15075; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was duly noticed and circulated for public review for a period of t hirty (30) days commencing on December 29, 2023, through January 29, 2024; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a MMRP, which is a program for monitoring and reporting on the Proposed Project’s mitigation measures was prepared for the Proposed Project and circulated with the MND; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2024, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2024 -
1 Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177
2 14 California Code of Regulations §§15000-15387
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - South of Iris [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF IRIS 2 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
03 recommending that the City Council certify and adopt the MND and the MMRP for the Proposed Project, and the Planning Commission adopt ed Resolution No. 202 4-04 (PEN22-0159), Resolution No. 2024- 05 (PEN22-0158), and Resolution No. 2024- 06 (PEN22-0156 and PEN22- 0157) recommending that the City Council approve the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, on March 5 , 2024, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the City Council to consider the MND and the MMRP for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, in the exercise of its own independent judgment, the City Council determined that the MND and the MMRP prepared for the Proposed Project will reduce the potential environmental impact of the Proposed Project to levels of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will significantly affect the environment in a manner that otherwise would require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached E xhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.
Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all of the evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Proposed Project, attached hereto as Exhibits A and B respectively;
(b) Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit C;
(c) Planning Division Staff Reports prepared for the Planning Commission and City Council’s consideration and all documents, records , and references related thereto, and Planning Division Staff’s presentation at the public hearing; and
(d) Testimony, comments , and correspondence from all persons that were provided at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Section 3. Findings
That based on the content of the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council makes the following findings:
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - South of Iris [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF IRIS 3 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
(a) That all environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, with the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , have been reduced to levels of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment that would otherwise require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report;
(b) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and are consistent with the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; (c) That t he Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council and the City as the lead agency for the Proposed Project; and (d) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are adequate to serve as the required CEQA environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.
Section 4. Adoption
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record and Findings, as set forth herein, the City Council hereby adopts the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively.
Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions as heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 6. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - South of Iris [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF IRIS 4 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
Section 8. Certification
That the City Clerk of the City Council shall certify to the passage of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF MARCH 2024.
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL
_____________________________________
Ulises Cabrera,
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
_____________________________________________
Jane Halstead,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla,
City Attorney
Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration J.1.a
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - South of Iris [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF IRIS
HERITAGE PARK
Screencheck #1
April 2023
Prepared for:
City of Moreno Valley
Prepared by:
T&B Planning, Inc.
MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
ARCHITECTURE + LANDSCAPE
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK J.1.k
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Moreno Valley
Screencheck #1
April 2023
Prepared by:
T&B Planning, Inc.
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92602
714. 505. 6360 ext 125
Contact: Xiaofan Li
Applicant:
South of Iris 2021, LLC
41 Corporate Park, Suite 250
Irvine, California 92606
949.836.1897
Contact: David Patton
In association with:
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110
Irvine, California 92614
949. 660. 1568
Contact: Jeff Addison
Wood Architecture, Inc.
1512 W. Mineral King Ave.
Visalia, California 93291
805.468.5300
Contact: Kurt Koether
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK J.1.k
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
1.0 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Intent .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Overview ..............................................................................................................................................................2
2.0 - SITE PLANNING
2.1 Site Plan .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Site Design Guidelines ....................................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Development Criteria ......................................................................................................................................................4
3.0 - ARCHITECTURE
3.1 Architectural Design Principles ................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Architectural Styles ..........................................................................................................................................................9
3.3 General Architectural Design Guidelines ................................................................................................................18
4.0 - LANDSCAPE
1.1 Community Landscape Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 25
1.2 Streetscapes .......................................................................................................................................................................28
1.3 Fencing and Wall .............................................................................................................................................................30
1.4 Parks and Open Space ....................................................................................................................................................32
1.5 Basins ..................................................................................................................................................................................34
CONTENTS
i
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
T&B PLANNING, INC
Exhibit 1-1 Location Map ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Exhibit 1-2 Neighborhood Map ............................................................................................................................................2 Exhibit 2-1 Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................5 Exhibit 2-2 6-Pack Single-Family Detached Cluster Plotting Diagram ......................................................................7 Exhibit 2-3 Single-Family Detached Motorcourt Plotting Diagram ...........................................................................9 Exhibit 4-1 Conceptual Landscape Plan .......................................................................................................................... 27 Exhibit 4-2 Streescape ............................................................................................................................................................29 Exhibit 4-3 Fencing and Walls .............................................................................................................................................31
EXHIBITS
ii
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 1HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT
The Heritage Park Planned Unit Development Guidelines establish the Heritage Park community’s development standards and design guidelines. These guidelines ensure that the site’s future architecture and design will meet high-quality standards, be reflective of and compatible with the surrounding area, and be sensitive to the needs of the project. As shown in Exhibit 1-1, Location Map, Heritage Park is located in the southern portion of Moreno Valley, California. It is bordered by Iris Avenue to the north, a mix of existing residential homes and vacant land to the south and east, and Indian Street and vacant land to the west.
Exhibit 1-1, Location Map
Heritage Park
Moreno Valley City Limits
Legend
N.T.S.
PROJECT SITE
IRIS AVE
Project Site
GOYA AVE
KRAMERIA AVE
INDIAN ST
PERRIS BLVD
EMMA LN
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
T&B PLANNING, INC
1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW
Heritage Park transforms the vacant parcels into two neighborhoods totaling 165 detached, single-family homes. The design creates neighborhoods with comfortable human scale, visually charming architecture, and nurturing landscapes within well-proportioned spaces.
The 18.09-acre Heritage Park provides two distinct neighborhoods, each with its own housing product type. Exhibit 1-2, Neighborhood Map, shows the location of each neighborhood within the development.
Neighborhood 1 (Tentative Tract Map 38458) contains the following proposed land uses:
• 78 detached single-family homes in six pack clusters on a 9.42-acre site. • 0.39-acre tot lot and dog park.
• A retention basin.
Neighborhood 2 (Tentative Tract Map 38702) contains the following proposed land uses:
• 131 detached single-family motor-court homes on a 13.7-acre site. • 0.48-acre park and open space.
• A retention basin.
Key design focus of Heritage Park include:
2 Exhibit 1-2, Neighborhood Map
Neighborhood 1
TTM 38458
Six Pack Clusters
Neighborhood 2
TTM 38702
Motor Courts
Legend
N.T.S.
IRIS AVE
Rainbow Ridge
Elementary
March
Middle School
GOYA AVE
KRAMERIA AVE
INDIAN ST
PERRIS BLVD
EMMA LN
A livable and desirable community is fostered by well-designed neighborhoods with pedestrian-friendly streetscapes and distinct high- quality homes with varying architectural styles.
Rainbow Ridge Elementary School and March Middle School, located north of Iris Avenue, are easily accessible via internal sidewalks.
Parks with amenities serve as the focal points and gathering places for residents, linked together by internal sidewalks.
A distinct range of housing products is designed to cater to different buyer preferences and respond to current market conditions.
Walkability
Connectivity
Amenity
Diversity
Exhibit 1-2, Neighborhood Map N.T.S.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
3 2.0 SITE PLANNING
2.1 SITE PLAN
Heritage Park demonstrates pedestrian-oriented development by interconnecting the two neighborhoods with 6.5-foot-wide sidewalks along the internal roads which encourages physical activity by providing safe and convenient pedestrian access to strategically placing the parks within walking distance of homes. Exhibit 2.1, Site Plan, illustrates the relationship between the homes and the recreational spaces that promote healthy lifestyles and a sense of community. Additionally, these parks and sidewalks provide spaces for residents to gather and socialize, further contributing to the welcoming and inclusive environment that Heritage Park aims to create.
Ultimately, this design encourages residents to explore their surroundings and engage with their neighbors, strengthening the sense of community within the area.
2.2 SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Exhibit 2-1 presents the preliminary site plan for Heritage Park, which connects the community to its surroundings, prioritizes walkability, provides adequate access and circulation, and offers outdoor activity areas. This site plan serves as a conceptual design for the anticipated site development, with the final site design subject to additional review. Through this thoughtful site planning, Heritage Park creates a community that integrates with its surroundings while prioritizing livability and the pedestrian experience.
2.2.1 STREETSCAPE DIVERSITY
Achieving visual diversity and interest in the streetscape requires careful consideration and balance in planning floor plans, elevation styles, and color/material schemes.
To this end, specific criteria have been established for the plotting of homes, as outlined below:
1. Each builder development area consists of a minimum of three floor plans.
2. Each builder development area consists of a minimum of four elevations.
3. No more than two buildings in a row may feature the same elevation style.
4. Adjacent or facing buildings may feature the same floor plan and have different elevation styles.
Adhering to these design criteria, creates a varied and interesting streetscape within Heritage Park that allows for the individuality and diversity of its residents while maintaining a cohesive overall aesthetic.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 4 T&B PLANNING, INC
Exhibit 2-1, Site Plan
Park & Open
Space
Retention Basin
Internal Street
Internal Street
Legend
N.T.S.
12/01/2022
A-2
GOYA AVENUE
IRIS AVENUE
613.73'
LOT
19 LOT
18 LOT
2 36'
331.87' 299'
314.90'
328.00'
22'
56'
56'
10' 10'
EXISTING PL
36' 6.5'
20'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
60'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
FUTURE PL
10'
6.5' 6.5'
22'
33'
10'
10'
13.9'
3' 24' 3'
5'
RETENTION BASIN17,835 SQ. FT. TOP9,324 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
6.5'
TOT LOT
0.27 AC
38'
10' 10'
DOG PARK
0.12 AC
N
JOB #: 20041
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. 0
25 50
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 156
Total Provided Guest Parking: 43 (8'x22' Parallel)
Site Summary
9.18 Acres
78 8.5 DU/AC
199 (2.5:1 overall)
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
634.02'
GOYA AVENUE
INDIAN STREET
330.11'616.24'
LOT
19 RETENTION BASIN24,700 SQ. FT. TOP13,500 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
3' 6.5' 36' 6.5'
10'
12'
10'
190'
130'
5'
5'
36'
6.5'
10'
10.3' 6.5'
TOT LOT &DOG PARK
0.43 AC
10'
10'
6.5'
36'
6.5'
10'5'
10'
36'
5'
6.5'
3'
OPENSPACE.05 AC
6.5'
5'
10' 6.5' 36' 6.5'10'
5 2
30'
30'
22'22'
20.8'
13.5'
10'
44'
12'
44'
11' 11'
8.9'
BASIN MAINTENANCEACCESS DRIVE ENTRY
10.2'
12'
JOB #: 22084
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 262
Provided Guest Parking: 66 (8'x22' Parallel)
7 (9'x20' Head-In)
73 Total Guest Spaces
Site Summary
13.7 Acres
131
9.56 DU/AC
335 (2.6:1 overall)
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines.
N
0 20
40 80
Neighborhood 1
(TTM 38458)
Neighborhood 2
(TTM 38702)
IRIS AVE
INDIAN ST
GOYA AVE
2.2.2 ENTRYWAY
1. Landscaping, public space, and/or “gateway” features should be used to define the entryways into the Heritage Park.
2. Entryway features shall reflect the overall architectural identity.
2.2.3 CIRCULATION AND ACCESS
1. Site circulation must allow for and facilitate emergency access to the site and all buildings.
2. Safe and comfortable pedestrian environments shall be created.
3. Encouraging the use of multiple modes of transportation among residents is an essential aspect of a well- connected community. In Heritage Park, pedestrian connectivity between residential neighborhoods and community amenities, such as schools and parks, is prioritized through the design of sidewalks.
2.3 DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
Heritage Park contains two options for home ownership: 6-pack single-family detached homes within Neighborhood 1 (TTM 38458) and single-family detached motor court homes within Neighborhood 2 (TTM 38702). The following pages provide the lot criteria, setback requirements, and other relevant development standards for each of the residential product types. These requirements ensure that each property adheres to the high-quality standards set forth by the development guidelines contained in this document and contribute to the community’s cohesive and visually appealing streetscape. Additionally, prototypical plotting diagrams are provided to illustrate the relationship between the buildings, property lines, and the street and/or open space. It is important to note that these diagrams depict a typical plotting concept for a particular product type and are not intended to represent all possible plotting plans for the product offerings.
Example of Landscaped Entryway
Example of Neighborhood Sidewalk
Example of Varied Elevations to Create an Interesting Streetscene J.1.k
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
5 Exhibit 2-1, Site Plan
Park & Open
Space
Retention Basin
Internal Street
Internal Street
Legend
N.T.S.
12/01/2022
A-2
GOYA AVENUE
IRIS AVENUE
613.73'
LOT
19 LOT
18 LOT
2 36'
331.87' 299'
314.90'
328.00'
22'
56'
56'
10' 10'
EXISTING PL
36' 6.5'
20'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
60'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
FUTURE PL
10'
6.5' 6.5'
22'
33'
10'
10'
13.9'
3' 24' 3'
5'
RETENTION BASIN17,835 SQ. FT. TOP9,324 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
6.5'
TOT LOT
0.27 AC
38'
10' 10'
DOG PARK
0.12 AC
N
JOB #: 20041
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. 0
25 50
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 156
Total Provided Guest Parking: 43 (8'x22' Parallel)
Site Summary
9.18 Acres
78 8.5 DU/AC
199 (2.5:1 overall)
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
634.02'
GOYA AVENUE
INDIAN STREET
330.11'616.24'
LOT
19 RETENTION BASIN24,700 SQ. FT. TOP13,500 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
3' 6.5' 36' 6.5'
10'
12'
10'
190'
130'
5'
5'
36'
6.5'
10'
10.3' 6.5'
TOT LOT &DOG PARK
0.43 AC
10'
10'
6.5'
36'
6.5'
10'5'
10'
36'
5'
6.5'
3'
OPENSPACE.05 AC
6.5'
5'
10' 6.5' 36' 6.5'10'
5 2
30'
30'
22'22'
20.8'
13.5'
10'
44'
12'
44'
11' 11'
8.9'
BASIN MAINTENANCEACCESS DRIVE ENTRY
10.2'
12'
JOB #: 22084
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 262
Provided Guest Parking: 66 (8'x22' Parallel)
7 (9'x20' Head-In)
73 Total Guest Spaces
Site Summary
13.7 Acres
131
9.56 DU/AC
335 (2.6:1 overall)
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines.
N
0 20
40 80
Neighborhood 1
(TTM 38458)
Neighborhood 2
(TTM 38702)
IRIS AVE
INDIAN ST
GOYA AVE
Exhibit 2-1, Site PlanN.T.S.
Not es: The graphic is for illustrative purpose only; final design may vary.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 6 T&B PLANNING, INC
NEIGHBORHOOD 1 (TTM 38458) - 6-PACK SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED CLUSTER
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Homes in Neighborhood 1 will include single-family detached homes oriented on a short stub street arranged in 6-pack clusters. Some homes located adjacent to the streets will have front doors facing these streets to create a more inviting street scene.
LOT CRITERIA
Total Gross Acres 9.42 ac
Density 8. 3 du/ac
Number of Homes 78 du
Number of Plans 4
Number of Elevations 4
MINI. FRONT SETBACKS 1
Entry from Exterior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Exterior Property Line 10’
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Edge of Drive Aisle 3’
MINI. SIDE SETBACKS 1
Living Space from Internal Street /Back of Sidewalk 10’ Living Space from Exterior Property Line 10’
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Edge of Drive Aisle 3’
MINI. REAR SETBACKS 1
Living Space from Exterior Property Line 10’
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
BLDG. TO BLDG. DISTANCE
Garage to Garage 30 ’
Side to Side 10’
BUILDING HEIGHTS 2
Maximum Building Height 2-s tory or 35’
PARKING3
Parking Spaces per Unit 2 gar age spaces
Notes:
1 Eaves, cornices, awnings, bay windows, and other similar architectural features may encroach up to 3’ into the required setbacks, provided that such a feature shall be at least 3’ from any property line.
2 “Building height” means the vertical distance from the grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the highest point of the highest gable of a pitch or hip roof, but exclusive of vents, air conditioners, chimneys or other such incidental appurtenances. 3 Guest parking is provided on the internal streets and designated areas.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
7 NEIGHBORHOOD 1 (TTM 38458) - 6-PACK SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED CLUSTER
TYPICAL PLOTTING DIAGRAM
Exhibit 2-2, 6-Pack Single-Family Detached Cluster Typical Plotting Diagram Not es: Typical product examples are provided for reference purposes only; actual building layouts and footprints may vary. 12/01/2022
A-2
GOYA AVENUE
IRIS AVENUE
613.73'
LOT
19 LOT
18 LOT
2 36'
331.87'299'
314.90'
328.00'
22'
56'
56'
10'10'
EXISTING PL
36' 6.5'
20'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
60'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
FUTURE PL
10'
6.5' 6.5'
22'
33'
10'
10'
13.9'
3'24'3'
5'
RETENTION BASIN
17,835 SQ. FT. TOP
9,324 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
6.5'
TOT LOT
0.27 AC
38'
10'10'
DOG PARK
0.12 AC
N
JOB #: 20041
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. 0 25 50
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 156
Total Provided Guest Parking: 43 (8'x22' Parallel)
Site Summary
9.18 Acres
78 8.5 DU/AC
199 (2.5:1 overall)
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
634.02'
GOYA AVENUE
INDIAN STREET
330.11'616.24'
LOT
19 RETENTION BASIN
24,700 SQ. FT. TOP
13,500 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
3'
6.5'
36'
6.5'
10'
12'
10'
190'
130'
5'
5' 36' 6.5' 10'10.3' 6.5'
TOT LOT &
DOG PARK
0.43 AC
10'
10' 6.5' 36' 6.5' 10'5'
10' 36' 5'6.5'
3'
OPEN
SPACE
.05 AC
6.5'
5'
10'
6.5'36'
6.5'10'
5 2
30'
30'
22' 22'
20.8'
13.5'
10'
44'
12'
44'
11'
11'
8.9'
BASIN MAINTENANCE
ACCESS DRIVE ENTRY
10.2' 12'
JOB #: 22084
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 262
Provided Guest Parking: 66 (8'x22' Parallel)
7 (9'x20' Head-In)
73 Total Guest Spaces
Site Summary
13.7 Acres
131
9.56 DU/AC
335 (2.6:1 overall)
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines.
N
0 20 40 80
N.T.S.
Key Map
FLOOR PLAN 4
INTERNAL STREET
A
A
A
C
A
B
FLOOR PLAN 1
FRONT ENTRY
FLOOR PLANS
EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
FLOOR PLAN 2
INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
FLOOR PLAN 3
EDGE OF DRIVE AISLE
A
B
C
HOA MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
HOMEOWNER MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 8 T&B PLANNING, INC
NEIGHBORHOOD 2 (TTM 38702) - SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED MOTORCOURT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Homes in Neighborhood 2 will include single-family detached homes clustered around a motor court. The product typically includes four to eight units. Primary entries and walks face either the motor court or the internal street.
LOT CRITERIA
Total Gross Acres 8.91 ac
Density 10 .2 du/ac
Number of Homes 87 du
Number of Plans 3
Number of Elevations 4
MINI. FRONT SETBACKS 1
Living Space from Exterior Property Line 10’
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Edge of Drive Aisle 2.5 ’
MINI. SIDE SETBACKS 1
Living Space from Exterior Property Line 4 10’
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Edge of Drive Aisle 3’
MINI. REAR SETBACKS 1
Living Space from Interior Property Line 5’
Living Space from Exterior Property Line 10’
BLDG. TO BLDG. DISTANCE
Garage to Garage 30 ’
Side to Side 10’
BUILDING HEIGHTS 2
Maximum Building Height 2-s tory or 35’
PARKING3
Parking Spaces per Unit 2 gar age spaces
Notes:
1 Eaves, cornices, awnings, bay windows, and other similar architectural features may encroach up to 3’ into the required setbacks, provided that such a feature shall be at least 3’ from any property line.
2 “Building height” means the vertical distance from the grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the highest point of the highest gable of a pitch or hip roof, but exclusive of vents, air conditioners, chimneys or other such incidental appurtenances. 3 Guest parking is provided on the internal streets and designated areas. 4 Floor Plan 3 has a minimum of 5’ side setback from the exterior property line.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
9 NEIGHBORHOOD 2 (TTM 38702) - SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED MOTORCOURT
TYPICAL PLOTTING DIAGRAM
Exhibit 2-3, Single-Family Detached Motorcourt Typical Plotting Diagram Not es: Typical product examples are provided for reference purposes only; actual building layouts and footprints may vary.
FLOOR PLAN 1
FRONT ENTRY
FLOOR PLANS
EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
FLOOR PLAN 2
INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE
FLOOR PLAN 3
EDGE OF DRIVE AISLE
A
B
C
INTERNAL STREET
A
A
A
C
C
A
B
B
HOA MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
HOMEOWNER MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
12/01/2022
A-2
GOYA AVENUE
IRIS AVENUE
613.73'
LOT
19 LOT
18 LOT
2 36'
331.87'299'
314.90'
328.00'
22'
56'
56'
10'10'
EXISTING PL
36' 6.5'
20'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
60'
ABANDONED
EASEMENT
FUTURE PL
10'
6.5' 6.5'
22'
33'
10'
10'
13.9'
3'24'3'
5'
RETENTION BASIN
17,835 SQ. FT. TOP
9,324 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
12'
ACCESS
ROAD
6.5'
TOT LOT
0.27 AC
38'
10'10'
DOG PARK
0.12 AC
N
JOB #: 20041
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. 0 25 50
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 156
Total Provided Guest Parking: 43 (8'x22' Parallel)
Site Summary
9.18 Acres
78 8.5 DU/AC
199 (2.5:1 overall)
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
634.02'
GOYA AVENUE
INDIAN STREET
330.11'616.24'
LOT
19 RETENTION BASIN
24,700 SQ. FT. TOP
13,500 SQ. FT. TOE
DEPTH 6FT
3'
6.5'
36'
6.5'
10'
12'
10'
190'
130'
5'
5' 36' 6.5' 10'10.3' 6.5'
TOT LOT &
DOG PARK
0.43 AC
10'
10' 6.5' 36' 6.5' 10'5'
10' 36' 5'6.5'
3'
OPEN
SPACE
.05 AC
6.5'
5'
10'
6.5'36'
6.5'10'
5 2
30'
30'
22' 22'
20.8'
13.5'
10'
44'
12'
44'
11'
11'
8.9'
BASIN MAINTENANCE
ACCESS DRIVE ENTRY
10.2' 12'
JOB #: 22084
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
Total Acres
Total Homes
Density
Provided Parking
Total Provided Assigned Parking: 262
Provided Guest Parking: 66 (8'x22' Parallel)
7 (9'x20' Head-In)
73 Total Guest Spaces
Site Summary
13.7 Acres
131
9.56 DU/AC
335 (2.6:1 overall)
Notes:
1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only.
2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance.
3. Base information per parcel map.
4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information.
5. Building Footprints may change due to the final design elevation style.
6. Open space area is subject to change.
7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines.
N
0 20 40 80
N.T.S.
Key Map
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 10 T&B PLANNING, INC
This page is intentionally left blank.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
11 3.0 ARCHITECTURE
3.1 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES
The Heritage Park architectural guidelines serve as a framework for achieving high-quality design within the community, expressing the desired character of future development and addressing the various architectural design aspects. In designing homes within Heritage Park, compatibility with the overall community’s character is emphasized through the selection of the various architectural styles within the community. Careful attention is paid to floor plans, roof forms, building materials, and colors to ensure the highest quality neighborhood appeal and a positive contribution to the overall character of the surrounding community.
To establish a unified visual theme within Heritage Park, the architectural guidelines provide clear direction and design criteria while providing for innovative design and changes in residential architecture. The included sketches and graphic representations are intended for conceptual purposes only, serving as general visual aids in understanding the Design Guidelines’ primary intent and potential implementation. By adhering to these guidelines, Heritage Park can maintain a cohesive and high-quality aesthetic that enhances the overall character of the community.
3.2 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Considering the existing character and building development history of Moreno Valley, has resulted in the architectural themes selected for Heritage Park. While these styles draw from historical references, it is essential to note that other themes may also be considered during the architectural review process. By remaining open to alternative architectural styles and designs, Heritage Park can continue to evolve and adapt to its community’s changing needs and preferences while maintaining a cohesive and visually appealing environment.
The architectural styles for Heritage Park include:
• Ranch
• Spanish
• Prairie
• Craftsman
The distinguishing characteristics of each architectural style envisioned for Heritage Park are described below.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 12 T&B PLANNING, INC
Massing
• Predominant rectangular building form
Roofs
• Predominant gable and shed roofs
• 3:12 to 5:12 typical roof pitch
• 12” to 16” eave; 8” rake
• Flat concrete tiles; flat rustic shingle tiles
Exterior Walls
• Stucco
• Limited use of siding on front elevation encouraged
Windows
• Square or rectangular window shapes
• 1” minimum window recess
Details
• Window headers and sills
• Exposed truss tails or fascia boards
Colors
• Primary - Soft to light earthy colors as pale beiges, light khaki and green • Fascia and trims - Contrasting colors in darker brown, green and weathered gray tones
• Accent - Contrasting colors in light or dark tones
• Roof - Grays and browns
RANCH - DESIGN ELEMENTS
The Ranch style is a distinctly American architectural style that originated from large ranches in the late 19th century and evolved to suit the contemporary family lifestyle. The popularity of the Ranch style surged in the United States after World War II.
Characterized by a primary gable roof and a single-story design, the typical Ranch home is known for its long and close-to-the-ground profile, featuring minimal exterior decoration. However, contemporary Ranch style homes may incorporate two-story designs and details borrowed from Mediterranean or Colonial styles, adding unique accents and enhancing the overall aesthetic appeal.
Identifying Characteristics
• Informal, asymmetrical building form
• Low plate lines and low-pitched roof forms
• Siding and/or stone accents
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
13 RANCH - ELEVATION ILLUSTRATION
12/01/2022
A-4
1/4” = 1’-0”
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
Horizontal siding
Gable roof; Dark brown
Rectangular window; Shutter accent
Shutter accent
Stucco; Pale beiges
Stucco; Mild yellow
Dark tone accent color
Window sill
Rustic appearance
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 14 T&B PLANNING, INC
Massing
• Asymmetrical, one and two-story simple building masses Roofs
• Gable or hip roofs; shed roof over porch
• Typical 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch
• 0” to 12” overhang with tight rakes on gable roof ends • Shallow sloped, concrete “S” tiles in variegated colors (predominantly red) Exterior Walls
• Stucco
Windows and Entries
• Rectangular or square window shapes
• 1” minimum window recess
• Simple window trim; entry stucco or precast surround
• Recessed entry or feature window on front elevation
Details
• Ground-level arch elements on front elevation
• Stucco eave and trim details
• Exposed truss tails with simple decorative cut
• Gable roof end vents with concrete pipe details or recessed faux vents • Decorative metal railings or grilles
Colors
• Primary - White tones, pale to mid tones of mild yellows and light tans • Fascia and trims - Dark brown earth and wood tones
• Accent - Rich tones of blues, reds and washed greens
• Roof - Darker browns and reds
SPANISH - DESIGN ELEMENTS
The Spanish Colonial style was popular during the 1920s and early 1930s. This style evolved in California and the southwest as an adaptation of Mission Revival infused with additional elements and details from Latin America. It is common in California, Arizona, Texas and Florida.
Notably, the Spanish Colonial style was adapted to suit the California lifestyle, featuring key aspects such as open courtyards, red tile roofs, and stucco exteriors. This unique blend of influences and adaptations has contributed to the enduring popularity and appeal of the Spanish Colonial style in various regions across the United States.
Identifying Characteristics
• Red “S” tile roofs
• Arch element, recessed entry, or feature window on the front elevation • Decorative metal railing, gable roof end details
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
15 12/01/2022
A-6
1/4” = 1’-0”
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
SPANISH - ELEVATION ILLUSTRATION
Gable roof; Dark brown
Gable roof; Dark brown
Gable end detail
Rectangular window
Shutter accent
Stucco; White tones
Stucco; Mild yellow
Ground-level arch elements on front elevation
Decorative metal grilles
Decorative metal grilles
Recessed entry
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 16 T&B PLANNING, INC
Massing
• Strong horizontal building form
• One and two-story massing
Roofs
• Low-pitched hip roofs or flat horizontal roofs
• Typical 3:12 to 4:12 roof pitch
• 12” to 24” overhangs
• Flat concrete tiles
Exterior Walls
• Stucco
Windows
• Square or rectangular window shapes
• Horizontal window grouping
• 1” minimum window recess
• Trim used to unify window bands
Details
• Stucco square porch columns
• Contrasting wall materials or trims emphasizing horizontally Colors
• Primary - Neutral earthy tones and lighter and whiter tones • Fascia and trims - Muted earthy colors such as browns, grays, greens and wheat tones with pops of rusts, reds and oranges
• Accent - Deep red, green and medium dark wood tones; blues used on occasion
• Roof - Dark in value of brown and gray tones
PRAIRIE - DESIGN ELEMENTS
The Prairie style, developed by Frank Lloyd Wright, gained significant popularity during the early 1900s. Wright’s philosophy emphasized that a building should fulfill its primary function while reflecting character, life, spirit, and beauty. These principles became increasingly influential as the Prairie style spread throughout the country.
One of the key characteristics of Prairie design is its emphasis on horizontal massing, which complements the surrounding landscape and creates a sense of unity between the building and its environment. Clean lines are also a hallmark of the Prairie style, focusing on simplicity and functionality. These elements, combined with Wright’s vision for harmonious and organic architecture, have contributed to the lasting influence and appeal of the Prairie style.
Identifying Characteristics
• Horizontal massing and clean lines
• Low-pitched hip roofs
• Details emphasizing horizontal lines
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
17 PRAIRIE - ELEVATION ILLUSTRATION
12/01/2022
A-8
1/4” = 1’-0”
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
Low-pitched hip roof; Dark brown
Low-pitched hip roof; Dark brown
Overhang without brackets
Overhang without brackets
Grouped windows; Trimmed
Grouped windows; Trimmed
Stucco; Neutral earthy tone color
Stucco; Neutral earthy tone color
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 18 T&B PLANNING, INC
Massing
• Simple boxed massing with vertical and horizontal breaks Roofs
• Basic side-to-side gable with cross gables
• Typical 3:12 to 4:12 roof pitch
• 18” to 30” overhang
• Flat concrete shingle
Exterior Walls
• Stucco
Windows
• Vertical multi-paned windows at front elevations
• Windows trim surrounds with headers and sills
• Built-up header trims at front windows
Details
• Decorative use of cross beams, braces, and rafter tails • Porches often feature tapered columns and pilasters
• Brick or stone veneer elements visually anchor the building mass to the ground plane
Colors
• Primary - Light earth tone
• Accent - Playful or dark accent color
CRAFTSMAN - DESIGN ELEMENTS
Influenced by the English Arts and Crafts movement of the late 19th century and originating in California, the Craftsman style emerged as a distinctly American architectural style. Building on the principles of Bungalow architecture, the Craftsman style sought to eliminate excessive ornamentation and instead create beauty through the simplified lines and masses of the building itself.
During the 1920s and 1930s, the Craftsman style rapidly spread throughout the country, becoming known for its emphasis on handcrafted quality and creating natural, warm, and livable homes. This unique style often incorporates elements such as exposed rafters, handcrafted stonework, and natural materials, reflecting a commitment to craftsmanship and a desire for a closer connection to the natural world.
Identifying Characteristics
• Low-pitched gable roofs, occasionally hipped
• Wide projecting eaves with exposed rafter tails, and decorative beams or braces added under the gables
• Columns or column bases frequently continue to ground level J.1.k
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
19 12/01/2022
A-10
JOB#: 20041
DAVID PATTON / MICHAEL PATTON
41 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92606
(949) 836 - 1897
SOUTH OF IRIS
MORENO VALLEY, CA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION 1/4” = 1’-0”
CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATION ILLUSTRATION
Flat concrete shingle
Vertical double-paned windows
Light earth tone stucco
Vertical double-paned windows
Rafter tails
Stucco
Gable end detail
Recessed entry porch
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 20 T&B PLANNING, INC
3.3 GENERAL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following are essential architectural design elements to be considered within Heritage Park. These guidelines aim to achieve a diverse yet unified standard of neighborhood design that reflects the surrounding area’s ambiance while providing design flexibility.
3.3.1 ARCHITECTURE FORWARD DESIGN
1. Buildings fronting the internal street should be designed so that active and articulated architecture will visually dominate the street and allow for direct views of the street and outdoor living space to enhance the sense of security. This can be achieved by orienting rooms, doors, and windows toward streets and public areas or having residences “open up” to the street through frontage elements such as front stoops, porches, and courtyards.
2. Garages are encouraged to be set behind the front face of the building or be oriented to alleys or motorcourt drives to minimize the visual dominance of garages along the street, where it is feasible.
3.3.2 BUILDING ORIENTATION
1. In general, buildings should be located and oriented to define internal streets and primary open space areas as appropriate to the product type.
2. Careful consideration should be given to building orientation and building placement to protect privacy, views, and the neighborhood’s visual quality and maximize the buildings’ solar access where feasible and reasonable.
3. Entries or porches should be the strongest element on the front building facade.
4. Side entries are allowed to provide design flexibility and vary the curb appeal.
3.3.3 BUILDING FORM, MASSING AND ARTICULATION
1. Building massing along the street is encouraged to be varied to create a quality streetscene.
2. Plane offsets and varied roof forms are encouraged.
3. Provide visual harmony by applying a common family of details based on the architectural style for each neighborhood.
4. To create an engaging and visually appealing community streetscape, consider incorporating appropriate architectural treatments on buildings that are visible from the streets and parks. These treatments could include roof overhangs and projections, among others, and should be used to enhance the elevations of buildings and create a dynamic and aesthetic edge in public areas.
Example of Buildings fronting the Street
Example of Garage Oriented to Motorcourt Drive
Example of Recessed Entry
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
21 3.3.4 COLORS AND MATERIALS
1. Building materials and colors should be appropriate to the overall neighborhood design theme and relate to the selected architectural style.
2. Where color or material changes occur on the building, such changes should only occur at inside corners or wrapped to termination points of at least 24 inches that provide a finished appearance from the street.
3. Columns and posts should be enveloped by the color and materials, which should come to an end at the point where the material changes.
4. Apply colors and materials to enhance changes in wall plane, reinforce articulation of elevations, and enhance special features such as entries, single-story elements, etc.
5. Select high-quality, low-maintenance, and durable materials to minimize the need for a replacement that would contribute to landfill waste.
6. Appropriate building materials include, but are not limited to:
• Stucco
• Simulated wood siding
• Natural or manufactured stone veneer
• Natural or manufactured brick veneer
• Metal
• Vinyl Windows
3.3.5 ROOFS
1. Select roof forms, pitches and materials that are consistent with the architectural style of the building. Consider roof forms in relation to the building mass to improve massing relief along public streets and on other publicly visible elevations.
2. Varied roof forms, offsets and materials consistent with the architectural style of the building are encouraged to create variation in the streetscene.
3. Keep roof forms simple and efficient based on the architectural style and plan shape. Avoid overly complicated roof design that detracts from the characteristics of the architectural style.
4. Consider the visual impact of the placement of photovoltaic panels and/or tiles, as well as any solar water heating panels, while designing roof plans. Minimize or group rooftop equipment to leave adequate, continuous space for rooftop photovoltaic systems where feasible.
Example of Enhanced Rear Window Treatments
Example of Accent Color and Stucco Wall
Example of Rafter Tail
Example of Varied Roof Forms
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 22 T&B PLANNING, INC
3.3.6 GARAGES AND PARKING AREAS
1. Garages facing the internal street may incorporate treatments such as trellises, windows or other enhancement features appropriate to the architectural style to visually soften and minimize the appearance of the garages within the overall façade composition.
2. Garage doors are encouraged to have a minimum recess of 6” behind the garage wall planes.
3. For residential products without the ability to store trash and recyclable material bins in a side yard or rear yard, adequate space shall be provided in the garage interior to accommodate a minimum of two collection bins.
4. Provide landscape planting areas adjacent to buildings along the court drives to soften the building’s appearance.
Guest parking spaces may be located in designated spaces between the buildings, off the motor court or along the internal street.
3.3.7 WINDOWS
1. Coordinate each elevation’s window shape, size, and location to provide a logical, proportional, and attractive composition consistent with the architectural style.
2. Arrange and determine the dimensions of windows in accordance with the conditions of the site, taking into account privacy concerns to the extent possible.
3. Feature windows are encouraged to incorporate enhancements such as recess into the wall plane, enhanced sills with corresponding roof elements, shutters, projecting overhead trellis elements, or decorative grilles if appropriate to the architectural style. All other windows on the front elevation feature trim surrounds, headers and/or sills, or other enhancements consistent with the architectural style of the building.
4. When used, the shape and size of shutters should be proportionate to the window opening and appear as functioning elements.
3.3.8 GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS
1. Where it is feasible, thoughtful consideration should be given as to the location of the overall guttering system during the architectural design process so that the result is a cohesive building façade in which all elements, including gutters and downspouts, work together to create a pleasing building façade.
2. Whenever possible, downspouts should be located in the least conspicuous location, such as side and rear facades of the building.
3. Exposed gutters and downspouts may be painted to complement or match the colors of the surfaces to which they are attached.
Example of Garage Treatments
Example of Painted Downspouts Located at the Side of the Building Example of Window Treatment
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
23 3.3.9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING
1. Exterior lighting angle and intensity should be planned for night-time mobility and safety.
2. Exterior lighting is encouraged to be shielded to minimize glare and light spill.
3. Light fixtures shall be designed to be consistent with the architectural style of the building.
3.3.10 SOLAR PANELS
1. On sloped roofs, install solar panels at locations that optimize functionality. The panels’ size, shape, and placement must be carefully considered as part of the overall building design composition.
2. Solar panels should be mounted as close to the roof plane as practical.
3. Solar panel layout should complement the geometry and proportions of the roof.
4. Group solar panels together, so they are less visually distracting. Avoid single-panel arrays.
5. Use panels with non-reflective coatings to minimize glare. Exposed frames and components should have a non- reflective surface.
3.3.11 SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
All new development in Heritage Park must comply with California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen Building Standards (California Code of Regulations Title 24, Parts 6 and 11) as applicable, to promote environmental sustainability, reduce energy costs, and enhance the quality of life. The CALGreen Code outlines mandatory and optional measures for site design, energy and water efficiency, material conservation, and environmental quality. Title 24 sets out requirements for energy, water efficiency, and air quality, but developers/builders have the flexibility to choose which measures to implement, either through the prescriptive or performance methods, provided that they meet the specified threshold. Key sustainable building features include:
1. Passive Solar Design: Properly designed window location, glazing type and shading, thermal mass location and type to optimize energy efficiency.
2. Optimized Building Energy Performance Features: Thermal envelope, low U-value windows, high Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) roofs, efficient heating, cooling, and lighting devices and systems.
3. Renewable Energy Sources: Photovoltaics and solar water heating systems.
4. Water-efficient Fixtures and Appliances.
5. Electric Vehicle Charging: An electric vehicle charging station in the garage of each home.
6. Sustainable Materials: Recycled, rapidly renewable, regionally or locally manufactured materials.
7. Construction Waste Management.
Effective in 2023
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 24 T&B PLANNING, INC
This page is intentionally left blank.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
25 4.0 LANDSCAPE
4.1 COMMUNITY LANDSCAPE PLAN
The landscape concept components create a sense of community identity that links the residential neighborhoods with the recreational components of Heritage Park.
The community’s thematic identity is reinforced by the landscape design of streetscapes, parks, walls, and fences. Furthermore, the recommended plant palette, community elements, and hardscape materials work in concert to reinforce and emphasize the community landscape theme at major community focal points and gathering places, such as the parks.
Exhibit 4.1, Conceptual Landscape Plan, illustrates the landscape concept components of Heritage Park. It identifies the recreational and open space areas and the streetscape landscaping that creates a pleasant environment for residents and visitors.
General landscape design guidelines are provided below.
1. The conceptual landscape and planting design shall comply with the City of Moreno Valley’s Landscape and Irrigation Standards Section 9.17.030 of the Municipal Code.
2. The landscaping should primarily feature water-efficient, drought-tolerant, and/or indigenous plant materials and incorporate water-conserving equipment such as bubblers, drip systems, low-volume sprays, and/or smart irrigation controls, wherever suitable.
3. The landscape areas shall be designed to promote water retention and allow runoff from impervious surfaces into permeable areas.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK 26 T&B PLANNING, INC
This page is intentionally left blank.
J.1.k
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Appendix I - PUD Design Guidelines - South of Iris (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Exhibit B
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 1 of 37
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
PEN22-0159 (General Plan Amendment), PEN22-0158 (Change of Zone), PEN22-0156 (Tentative Tract Map 38458) and PEN22 -0157 (Conditional Use Permit) The following is a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for South of Iris Project (Neighborhood 1 of the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development) located in Moreno Valley, California. This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. This MMRP lists all applicable Project Mitigation Measures (MM), Standard Conditions (SC), and environmental commitments for executing Best Management Practices provided by the Project Applicant that are required to be implemented with the Project under existing Plans, Programs, and Policies for environmental resource protection. This MMRP includes implementation timing and responsible party to ensure proper enforcement of all MMs and SCs to reduce Project impacts. The City of Moreno Valley, as the Lead Agency, will utilize the MMRP to document the implementation of Project mitigation and BMP environmental commitments, which ensure all project impacts are reduced to less than significance pursuant to The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a) Have a substan�al adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
c) In non- urbanized areas,
substan�ally degrade the exis�ng
visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regula�ons governing scenic quality?
MM AES-01- Perimeter Walls: Prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, the City of Moreno Valley shall verify that Project plans and the recorded CC&Rs for the Project include the following types of perimeter fencing and walls to be installed during construc�on and maintained in perpetuity throughout the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development:
a) Perimeter Block Walls- Perimeter block walls generally located around the exterior of the neighborhood to
provide homes with privacy and noise atenua�on from
abu�ng roads and off -site land uses. These Perimeter
Block Walls consist of textured split -face concrete solid bricks, with no openings. The wall shall measure six (6) feet in height as measured from ground surface on the
highest side of the fence including two (2) inch high
caps. The wall shall include 16 -inch block decora�ve
concrete block pil asters with no openings, at each lot line and change of fence type.
b) Interior Vinyl Fence: Interior Vinyl Fences are generally located between side yards and at the back of residen�al lots (excluding lots which rear on public streets, which are covered in item 1. above) to provide privacy and
security for residents. Interior Vinyl Fences have a height Prior to the
issuance of
building permits.
City’s Building Official,
Planning Division, and
the City Engineer.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 2 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
of six (6) feet as measured above ground surface and are constructed of tongue and groove panels, top and
botom rails, and vinyl posts with vinyl caps.
c) Tubular Steel Fence: Tubular Steel Fences are generally located at the perimeters of reten�on basin areas and
dog parks. These Tubular Steel Fences preserve scenic
views while maintaining security for residents and
visitors of the community. View fences have a maximum
height of six (6) feet and are constructed of tubular steel
0.5-inch square 16 -gauge palings and 1.5 -inch square
14-gauge tubing top and botom rails. The color finish of the tubular steel fence should complement the
community design theme.
The City’s Building Official, Planning Division, and the City Engineer shall verify construc�on plans show perimeter fencing and concrete block walls, according to items a through c above ; as listed within the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development and that perimeter walls and fences will be constructed from materials, colors, and textures that are similar and harmonious with the architecture and earth tones, as indicated on Project Plans, Design Guidelines, and in Figures 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Eleva�ons of the Dra� ISMND. Long -term maintenance of items a) through 3) above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Division prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
City review of Site Plans, Design Guidelines, CC&Rs and Ar�cles of Incorpora�on for the HOA shall verify that the CC&Rs provide guidelines for perpetual maintenance of all community perimeter fencing and walls for the Project shown on Figure 7: Site Plan of the ISMND. This verifica�on will be done by the City Engineer, Building Official, and/or Planning Division prior to issuance of final approval of the Tract Map and prior to issuance of building and J.1.l
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 3 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
grading permits for the Project and verified again within the recorded CC&Rs prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy. Implementa�on will be verified during Project inspec�ons by the City Building Inspector. Inclusion of the fencing plan and maintenance program shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs by the City Inspector, City Engineer, and Building Official prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy.
MM AES-02- Landscaping and Irriga�on: The City Building Official, Planning Division, and the City Engineer shall verify prior to Final Tract Map approval and prior to issuance of permits, that Project plans show landscaping and irriga�on along Iris Avenue and Goya Avenue providing effec�ve screening and visual buffers between the adjacent public streets and the Project; this includes permanent maintenance through the CC&Rs and HOA. The
second stories of the proposed residen�al structures that are visible from Iris Avenue and Goya Avenue shall be buffered.
Pursuant to the Heritage Park PUD Design Guidelines, landscaping along Iris Avenue and Goya Avenue should consist of the following:
Iris Avenue
Iris Avenue shall contain a 10 -foot curb separated parkway maintained by the HOA and adorned with six (6) Bloodgood London Plane Trees (or a suitable alterna�ve tree species with similar foliage and mature heights reaching 25- to 35-feet tall and canopies of up to 50 -feet wide) that provide a visual buffer between the street and adjacent residen�al areas.
Goya Avenue
Goya Avenue shall contain curb separated landscaped parkways maintained by the HOA and adorned with six (6) Chinese Pistache trees (or a suitable alterna�ve tree species with similar foliage and mature heights reaching 25- to 35-feet tall and canopies of up to 50-feet wide) that provide a visual buffer between the street and adjacent residen�al areas. At the Goya Street vehicular entry, a curb-separated walkway lined with four (4) Koelreuteria Bipinnata trees shall be implemented or If an alterna�ve spec ies is selected Prior to Final Tract
Map approval and
prior to issuance
of permits. Prior
to issuance of the
first cer�ficate of
occupancy
City Building Official,
Planning Division, and
the City Engineer.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 4 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
for implementa�on it shall provide similar foliage and reach mature heights up to 40- to 60-feet tall with a canopy of up to 30- feet to 40-feet wide.
MM AES-03- Exterior Finishes: The City’s Building Official and/or Planning Division shall verify prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, that plans will show the following architectural details on the front and rear facades (exteriors of residen�al structures) facing Goya Avenue and Indian Street and from public open space. Plan check shall include verifica�on by the City Engineer, Building Official and Planning Division that CC&Rs for the Project include guidelines for long term
maintenance of these features on these specific lots as described below and shown in
Figure 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Eleva�on
Plans in the Dra� ISMND and the Design Guidelines for the Project:
a) Building Form, Massing, and Ar�cula�on
1. Front and rear building setbacks along Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall be varied
2. Eleva�on Plans shown in Figure 9: Eleva�ons of the Dra� ISMND provide four architectural styles (Spanish, Ranch, Prairie, and Cra�sman) . Architectural building styles shall alternate along the streets.
3. Street entry driveways from Goya Avenue and Indian
Street shall include decora�ve pavement and large
container trees and plants.
4. Plans shall show plane offsets for façade ar�cula�on and varied roof forms.
5. Plans shall show matching structure details , such as window trim and exterior doors, according to the
architectural style of the structure.
6. Decora�ve architectural details will be added on building facades that are visible from adjacent streets and parks.
These treatments could include varied and
complimentary colors to accentuate building features,
brackets or trellises for roof overhangs and projec�ons, Prior to final tract
map approval and
issuance of
permits.
City Engineer, City
Building Official and
Planning Division
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 5 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
stonework, window shuters and decora�ve trim among
others. These details should be applied to enhance the
eleva�ons of buildings and create a dynamic and
aesthe�c in public areas.
b) Windows:
1. Coordinate each eleva�on’s window shape, size, and
loca�on to provide a logical, propor�onal, and atrac�ve composi�on consistent with the architectural style.
2. Arrange and determine the dimensions of windows in
accordance with the condi�ons of the site, taking into
account privacy concerns to the extent possible.
3. Feature windows are encouraged to incorporate
enhancements such as recess into the wall plane,
enhanced sills with corresponding roof elements,
shuters, projec�ng overhead trellis elements, or
decora�ve grilles if appropriate to the architectural
style. All other windows on the front eleva�on feature
trim surrounds, headers and/or sills, or other
enhancements consistent with the architectural style of the building.
4. When used, the shape and size of shuters should be
propor�onate to the window opening and appear as
func�oning elements.
c) Colors and Materials:
1. Building materials and colors shown on architectural plans are in earthtones. Final color selec�on should be appropriate to the overall neighborhood design theme
and relate to the selected architectural style.
2. Where color or material changes occur on the building, such changes should only occur at inside corners or
wrapped to termina�on points of at least 24 inches that provide a finished appearance from the street.
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 6 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
3. Columns and posts should be enveloped by the color
and materials, which should come to an end at the point where the material changes.
4. Apply colors and materials to enhance changes in wall plane, reinforce ar�cula�on of eleva�ons, and enhance
special features such as entries, single -story elements, etc.
5. Select high -quality, low -maintenance, and durable
materials to minimize the need for a replacement that
would contribute to landfill waste.
6. Appropriate building materials include, but are not
limited to:
- Stucco
- Simulated wood siding
- Natural or manufactured stone veneer
- Natural or manufactured brick veneer
- Metal
- Vinyl Windows
d) Roofs
1. Select roof forms, pitches and materials that are
consistent with the architectural style of the building.
Consider roof forms in rela�on to the building mass to
improve massing relief along public streets and on other publicly visible eleva�ons.
2. Varied roof forms, offsets and materials consistent with the architectural style of the building are encouraged to create varia�on in the street level views.
3. Keep roof forms simple and efficient based on the
architectural style and plan shape. Avoid overly
complicated roof design that detracts from the
characteris�cs of the architectural style.
4. Consider the visual impact of the placement of
photovoltaic panels and/or �les, as well as any solar
water hea�ng panels, while designing roof plans.
Minimize or group roo�op equipment to leave
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 7 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
adequate, con�nuous space for roo�op photovoltaic
systems where feasible.
e) Guters and Downspouts:
1. Where it is feasible, though�ul considera�on should be given as to the loca�on of the overall gutering system
during the architectural design process so that the result is a cohesive building façade in which all elements,
including guters and downspou ts, work together to
create a pleasing building façade.
2. Whenever possible, downspouts should be located in
the least conspicuous loca�on, such as side and rear
facades of the building.
3. Exposed guters and downspouts may be painted to
complement or match the colors of the surfaces to
which they are atached.
4. Guter and downspout loca�ons shall be subject to
CC&R guidelines and HOA approval.
Exterior finishes described above shall be constructed with the Project, enforced by the HOA according to recorded CC&Rs as shown on project plans, as verified by the City of Moreno Valley, prior to issuance of final tract map approval and issuance of permits. Incorpora�on of items a) through e above shall be incorporated in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Planning Division, Building Official and Inspector prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy to enhance street-level views from streets and public open spaces.
SC AES-01: Visual Impacts - Prior to issuance of permits and final tract map approval, the City Engineer and Planning D ivision shall verify that Project plans and CC&Rs for the Project incorporate guidelines/regula�ons for the following:
a) Enforce the Municipal Code requirements and Design
Guidelines to ensure that high quality development
During Plan Check
and Inspec�ons
and ongoing
City Engineer, Planning
Division, and
Developer/ Builder/
Contractor. HOA
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 8 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs a), c) con�nued…
yielding a pleasant living environment for exis�ng and
future residents ( GP Objec�ve 2-10)
b) New electrical and communica�on lines are to be placed underground (GP Policy 7.7.1)
c) The size, number and design on signs shall be subject to city review and approval to minimize degrada�on of
visual quality (GP Policy 7.7.2)
Minimize the visibility of wireless communica�on facili�es by the public. Encourage “stealth” designs and encourage new antennas to be located on exis�ng poles, buildings and other structures .
Antennas are to be mounted in a manner not exceeding the heights of these structures. (GP Policy 7.7.5)
Air Quality
d) Conflict with or obstruct
implementa�on of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumula�vely
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non -atainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
e) Expose sensi�ve receptors
to substan�al pollutant
concentra�ons?
SC AQ-01: Compliance with SCAQMD Rules - Throughout Project construc�on, the Project contractor shall adhere to the following rules outlined within SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan:
SCAQMD Rule 402: Prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quan��es of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
SCAQMD Rule 403: Governs emissions of fugi�ve dust during construc�on and opera�on ac�vi�es. Compliance with this rule is achieved through applica�on of standard Best Management Prac�ces (BMPs), such as applica�on of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restric�ng vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessa�on o f construc�on ac�vity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor, City
of Moreno Valley
Building Officials
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 9 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a), b), c) Con�nued…
Rule 403 requires that fugi�ve dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addi�on, SCAQMD Rule 403 requires
implementa�on of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugi�ve dust from crea�ng a nuisance off-site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below and can reduce fugi�ve dust genera�on, Par�culate Mater 10 microns or greater in diameter (PM10). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensi�ve receptors. Rule 403 measures may include but are not limited to the following:
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifica�ons to all inac�ve
construc�on areas (previously graded areas
inac�ve for 10 days or more).
• Water ac�ve sites at least three �mes daily.
(Loca�ons where grading is to occur will be
thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving.)
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other
loose materials, or maintain at least 0.6 meters (2
feet) of freeboard (ver�cal space between the top
of the load and top of the trailer) in accordance
with the requirements of California Vehicle Code
sec�on 23114.
• Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15
miles per hour (mph) or less.
• Suspension of all grading ac�vi�es when wind
speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts)
exceed 25 mph.
• Bumper strips or similar BMPs shall be provided
where vehicles enter and exit the construc�on site
o n t o p a v e d r o a d s o r w a s h o ff t r u c k s a n d a n y equipment leaving the site each trip.
• Replan�ng disturbed areas as soon as prac�cal.
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 10 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a), b), c) Con�nued…
• During all construc�on ac�vi�es, construc�on
contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site streets
if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of par�culate mater on public
streets. All sweepers shall be compliant with
SCAQMD Rule 1186.1, Less Pollu�ng Sweepers.
SCAQMD Rule 445: Prohibits permanently installed wood burning devices into any new development. A wood burning device means any fireplace, wood burning heater, or pellet-fueled wood heater, or any similarly enclosed, permanently installed, indoor or outdoor device burning any solid fuel for aesthe�c or space- hea�ng purposes, which has a heat input of less than one million Bri�sh thermal units per hour.
SCAQMD Rule 481: Applies to all spray pain�ng and spray coa�ng opera�ons and equipment, requiring that a person shall not use or operate any spray pain�ng or spray coa�ng equipment unless one of the following condi�ons is met:
(1) The spray coa�ng equipment is operated inside a control enclosure, which is approved by the Execu�ve Officer. Any control enclosure for which an applica�on for permit for new
construc�on, altera�on, or change of ownership or loca�on is submited a�er the date of adop�on of this rule shall be exhausted only through filters at a design face velocity not less than 100 feet per minute nor greater than 300 feet per minute, or through a water wash system designed to be equally effec�ve for the purpose of air pollu�on control.
(2) Coa�ngs are applied with high -volume low -pressure, electrosta�c and/or airless spray equipment.
(3) An alterna�ve method of coa�ng applica�on or control is used which has effec�veness equal to or greater than the equipment specified in the rule.
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 11 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a), b), c) Con�nued…
SCAQMD Rule 1108: Governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the vola�le organic compound (VOC) content in asphalt used in the Basin and regulates the VOC content of asphalt during construc�on. All asphalt used during Project construc�on must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1108.
SCAQMD Rule 1113: Governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coa�ng and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. Regulates VOC content of paints during construc�on. All paints and solvents used during Project construc�on and opera�on must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113.
SCAQMD Rule 1143: Governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coa�ng materials, cleaning of coa�ng applica�on equipment, and other solvent cleaning opera�ons by limi�ng their VOC content. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construc�on.
Solvents used during the construc�on phase must comply with this rule.
SCAQMD Rule 1186: Limits the presence of fugi�ve dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets cer�fica�on protocols and
requirements for contract street sweepers to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanita�on, transit, or school district.
SCAQMD Rule 1303: Governs the permi�ng of re-located or new major emission sources, requiring Best Available Control Measures and se�ng significance limits for PM10 among other pollutants.
SCAQMD Rule 1401: New Source Review of Toxic Air
Contaminants, specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risk, cancer burden, and non -cancer acute and chronic hazard index from new permit units, reloca�ons, or modifica�ons to exis�ng permit units, which emit toxic air contaminants.
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 12 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a), b), c) Con�nued…
SCAQMD Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from
Demoli�on/Renova�on Ac�vi�es, specifies work prac�ce
requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demoli�on and renova�on ac�vi�es, including the removal and associated disturbance of asbestos-containing materials (ACM).
SCAQMD Rule 2202: On-Road Motor Vehicle Mi�ga�on Op�ons, is to provide employers with a menu of op�ons to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes, to comply with federal and state Clean Air Act requirements, Health & Safety Code Sec�on 40458, and Sec�on 182(d)(1)(B) of the federal Clean Air Act. It applies to any employer who employs 250 or more employees on a full or part -� m e b a s i s a t a w o r k s i t e f o r a consecu�ve six-month period calculated as a monthly average.
MM AQ -02- Fugi�ve Dust Control Plan : Due to the size of the Project Area, a Fugi�ve Dust Control Plan is not needed for the Project, However, in order to mi�gate the effects of fugi�ve dust during Project construc�on and comply with SCAQMD rules, the Project must implement the establish ed procedures in Rule 403 and follow the applica�on of standard BMPs in construc�on and opera�on ac�vi�es, such as the following:
• The applica�on of water or chemical stabilizers to
disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by applica�on
of water, haul vehicles, restric�ng vehicle speeds on
unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from
paved site access roadways, cessa�on of construc�on
ac�vity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a
permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites
• Applica�on of the best available dust control measures are used for grading opera�ons and include the
applica�on of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quan�ty to prevent the genera�on of visible dust
plumes.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 13 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality a), b), c) Con�nued…
• Require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving opera�ons would occur.
MM AQ-03: Construc�on Idling: During Project construc�on, the Project contractor must install clear signage around the Project Site reminding construc�on workers to limit idling of construc�on equipment pursuant to the California Air Resource Board’s In -use Off Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regula�on.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Biological
Resources
a) Have a substan�al adverse
effect, either directly or through
habitat modifica�ons, on any
species iden�fied as a
candidate, sensi�ve, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regula�ons, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
MM BIO-01- Pre-construc�on Nes�ng Bird Survey: If construc�on occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre -construc�on clearance survey for nes�ng birds should be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegeta�on removal or ground disturbing ac�vi�es to ensure that no nes�ng birds will be disturbed during construc�on. Verifi c a � o n o f a p r e-construc�on clearance survey shall be conducted by the Planning Division and City Building and/or Grading Inspector. The survey shall be documented with a report prepared by a qualified biologist and provided to the City for the administra�ve record on the Project. If an ac�ve avian nest is discovered during pre -construc�on clearance survey the following best management prac�ces should take place:
• Construc�on should stay outside of a no -disturbance
buffer. The size of the no disturbance buffer will be
determined by a wildlife biologist,
• Limits of construc�on will occur to avoid an ac�ve nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construc�on personnel
will be instructed on the sensi�vity of nest areas
• A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the ac�ve
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 14 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Biological
Resources
a) con�nued…
nest to ensure that nes�ng behavior is not adversely
affected by the construc�on ac�vity.
MM BIO -02- Burrowing Owl : The Planning Division and City Building and/or Grading Inspector shall verify that a 30 -day pre- construc�on burrowing owl clearance survey shall be conducted prior to issuance of grading permit and ground disturbing ac�vi�es.
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector, Project
Biologist
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Standard Condi�on
SC BIO-03- Stephan’s Kangaroo Rat: Since the Project Site is located within the Mi�ga�on Fee Area of the Stephan’s’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conserva�on Plan (SKR HCP), the developer will be required to pay fair share SKR HCP Mi�ga�on Fees prior to issuance of building permits and development of the Project pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.06,
Threatened and Endangered Species.
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Cultural
Resources
b) Cause a substan�al adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
MM CUL-01: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all ground -disturbing ac�vi�es. The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving ac�vi�es in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construc�on. The Project Archaeologist, in consulta�on with the Consul�ng Tribe(s) including Pechanga Band of Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Na�on (formerly known as the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan (CRMP) as defined in
MM CUL -03. The Project Archaeologist shall atend the pre - grading mee�ng with the City, the construc�on manager and any contractors, and Consul�ng Tribal representa�ves; and will Prior to the
issuance of
grading permit
Planning Division and
Building Official, City’s
Archaeological and
Paleontological
Monitors, Developer,
Contractor and
Builder, Pechanga
Band of Indians,
Morongo Band of
Mission Indians, Agua
Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians,
Rincon Band of
Luiseno Indians,
Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians ,
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 15 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
b) Con�nued…
conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�vity Training to those in atendance before any ground -disturbing ac�vity takes place. The archaeological monitor, provided by the Project Archaeologist, shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth -moving ac�vi�es in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. (formerly known as
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians
MM CUL-02: Na�ve American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit(s), the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Na�on (formerly known as the San Manuel Band of
Mission Indians) for tribal monitoring. The Developer is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance no�ce to the tribes of all ground -disturbing ac�vi�es. The Na�ve American Tribal Representa�ves (Na�ve American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redir ect earth moving ac�vi�es in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Na�ve American Monitor(s) shall atend the pre -grading mee�ng with the Project Archaeologist, City, the construc�on manager and any
contractors and will
present the Tribal Perspec�ve of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�vity Training to those in atendance.
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permit(s)
Project Builder/
Developer/Contractor,
Pechanga Band of
Indians, Morongo
Band of Mission
Indians, Agua Caliente
Band of Cahuilla
Indians, Rincon Band
of Luiseno Indians,
Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians ,
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
(formerly known as
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians,
Project Archeologist,
and construc�on
manager
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM CUL -03: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The Project Archaeologist, in consulta�on with the Consul�ng Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a CRMP in consulta�on pursuant to the defini�on in AB52 to address the details, �ming and responsibility of all archaeological and cult ural ac�vi�es that will occur on the project site. A consul�ng Tribe is defined as a Tribe that ini�ated the AB 52 tribal consulta�on process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consulta�on process, and has completed AB 52 consulta�on with the City as provided for in Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
and Project
ini�a�on.
Project Archeologist in
consulta�on with
Consul�ng Tribe(s)
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 16 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
b) Con�nued…
Cal Pub Res Code Sec�on 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project descrip�on and loca�on
b. Project grading and development scheduling;
c. Roles and responsibili�es of individuals on the Project; d. The pre-grading mee�ng and Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�vity Training details;
e. The protocols and s�pula�ons that the contractor, City, Consul�ng Tribe (s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources
discoveries, human remains/crema�ons, sacred and
ceremonial items, including any newly discovered
cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a
cultural resources evalua�on.
f. The type of recorda�on needed for inadvertent finds
and the s�pula�ons of recorda�on of sacred items.
g. Contact informa�on of relevant individuals for the Project.
MM CUL -04: Cultural Resource Disposi�on . In the event that Na�ve American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing ac�vi�es (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposi�on of the discoveries:
A. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preserva�on-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible.
Preserva�on in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development
affec�ng the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mi�ga�on Measure
MM
CUL-03. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in
In the event that
Na�ve American
cultural resources
are discovering
during ground
disturbing
ac�vi�es
(inadvertent
discoveries.
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 17 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
b) Con�nued…
perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur un�l all legally required cataloging and basic recorda�on have been completed. No recorda�on of sacred items is permited without the writen consent of all Consul�ng Na�ve American Tribal
Governments as defined in MM CUL-03. The loca�on for the future reburial area shall be iden�fied on a confiden�al
exhibit on file with the City and concurred to by the
Consul�ng Na�ve American Tribal Governments prior to
cer�fica�on of the environmental document.
MM CUL -05: The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan. If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground -disturbing ac�vi�es and the Project Archaeologist and/or Na�ve American Tribal
Representa�ve(s) are not present, the construc�on supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100 -foot radius around the discovery and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representa�ves to the site to assess the significance of the find.
Prior to the
issuances of
grading permit
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division,
Construc�on
supervisor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM CUL -06: Inadvertent Finds . If poten�al historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excava�on or construc�on ac�vi�es during the Project and which were not assessed within the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to Project approval, all ground -disturbing ac�vi�es in the affected area and within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person mee�ng the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representa�ve(s), and all site monitors per the Mi�ga�on Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and, as appropriate, recommend alterna�ve measures to avoid, minimize, or mi�gate nega�ve effects on the historic or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance sha ll not resume within a 100 foot -
radius of the discovery. A physical barrier will be
constructed, and all Project personnel will be excluded from this protected area. A Treatment Plan will be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and approved by all Consul�ng Par�es. The Treatment Plan will be implemented. A�er treatment is
If poten�al
historic or cultural
resources are
uncovered during
excava�on or
construc�on
ac�vi�es at the
project site that
were not
assessed by the
archaeological
report(s) and/or
environmental
assessment
conducted prior
to Project
approval
A qualified person
mee�ng the Secretary
of the Interior's
standards
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 18 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
b) Con�nued…
completed, work may resume within the protected area of the discovery.. Work shall be allowed to con�nue outside of the protec�ve buffer area and will be monitored by an addi�onal archaeologist and Tribal Monitors, if needed. Determina�ons and recommenda�ons by the Project Archaeologist shall be
immediately submited to the Planning Division for considera�on and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community
Development Department Director, in consulta�on with the State Historic Preserva�on Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consul�ng N a � v e A m e r i c a n T r i b e s a s d e fi n e d i n MM CUL -03, before any
further work commences in the affected area. If the discovery is determined to be significant and avoidance cannot be achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist, in consulta�on with the Consul�ng Tribes, and shall be submited to the City and Consul�ng Tribes for their review and approval prior to implementa�on of the said plan.
c) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside of
formally dedicated cemeteries?
MM CUL -07: Human Remains . If human remains and/or
crema�ons are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area un�l the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin.
a. Should human remains and/or crema�ons be
encountered on the surface or during any and all
ground-disturbing ac�vi�es (i.e., clearing,
grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading,
trenching, fence post placement and removal,
construc�on excava�on, excava�on for all water
supply, electrical, and irriga�on lines, and
landscaping phases of any kind), work in the
immediate vicinity of the discovery shall
immediately stop within a 100 -foot radius of the
discovery. The area shall be protected by a physical
barrier; project personnel/observers will be
restricted from entering this area. The County
Coroner is to be contacted within 24 h ours of
Upon the
discovery of
human remains
and/or
crema�ons
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division,
Construc�on
supervisor, County
Coroner
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 19 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
c) Con�nued…
discovery. The County Coroner has 48 hours to
make his/her determina�on pursuant to State and
Safety Code §7050.5. and Public Resources Code
(PRC) § 5097.98.
b. In the event that the human remains and/or
crema�ons are iden�fied as Na�ve American, the
Coroner shall no�fy the Na�ve American Heritage
Commission within 24 hours of determina�on
pursuant to subdivision (c) of HSC §7050.5.
c. The Na�ve American Heritage Commission shall
immediately no�fy the person or persons it
believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD).
The MLD has 48 hours, upon being granted access
to the Project site, to inspect the site of discovery
and make his/he r recommenda�on for final
treatment and disposi�on, with appropriate
dignity, of the remains and all associated grave
goods pursuant to PRC §5097.98
d. No photographs are to be taken except by the
Coroner, with writen approval by the Consul�ng
Tribe[s].
MM CUL-08 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Loca�ons. It is understood by all par�es that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Na�ve American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemp�on set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., par�es, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure informa�on related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemp�on set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).
In the event of the
reburial of Na�ve
American human
remains
County Coroner
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 20 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
c) Con�nued… MM CUL-09: Archaeological Report - Phases III and IV. Prior to final inspec�on by the City, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archaeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Archaeological Report, including the Phase III Data Recovery Report (if required for the Project) and the Cultural R esources Monitoring Report (Phase IV) that comply with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV Report shall include evidence of the required
cultural/historical sensi�vity training for the construc�on staff held during the pre -grade mee�ng. The Community
Development Department shall review the Reports to determine adequate mi�ga�on compliance. Provided that the Reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condi�on. Once the Report(s) are determined to be
adequate, two (2) copies shall be submited to the Eastern Informa�on Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy (including all site record forms, if created during the Project) shall be submited to each of the Consul�ng Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s) or Tribal Historic Preserva�on Officer (THPO).
Prior to final
inspec�on by the
City
Project
developer/permit
holder, Project
Archeologist
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Geology and
Soils
a) Directly or indirectly cause
poten�al substan�al adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
MM GEO-01- Grading Plan: Prior to issuance of the grading permit for the project, the City Engineer shall verify that the grading plan includes notes to the contractor which require removal and decompac�on of the upper zones of na�ve soils within footprints of the building pads
as recommended by the geotechnical
engineer for the Project. Implementa�on of this mi�ga�on measure shall be monitored during grading by the project geotechnical engineer and the City’s grading inspector to reduce risk of hydrocollapse.
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permit for
the Project.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer and Building
Official and City
Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
a) Directly or indirectly cause
poten�al substan�al adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
MM GEO-02- Compac�on: Fill soils that have not been properly compacted and cer�fied shall be excavated and recompacted during grading, the Project Geologist should observe the botom of excava�on prior to backfilling to verify no addi�onal removal is required. Proper fill criteria include:
During
recompac�on
upon the
compe��on of
grading
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 21 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
iii) seismic -related ground failure,
including liquefac�on?
iv) Landslides?
a) Result in substan�al soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil?
b) Be located on a geologic unit or
soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a
result of the project and
poten�ally result in on - or off-
site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefac�on or
collapse?
c) Be located on an expansive soil
as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
crea�ng substan�al
direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
1. Demoli�on ac�vi�es involving buried structures or
loosely backfilled excava�ons should be backfilled with
Engineered Fill.
2. Any undocumented fill encountered during grading
should be removed and replaced with Engineered Fill.
3. Fill soils should be placed in li�s approximately 6 inches thick, moisture-condi�oned to a minimum of 2 percent
above op�mum moisture content and compacted to
achieve at least 95 percent maximum density based on
ASTM Test Method D1557. Addi�onal li�s should not be
placed if the previous li� did not meet the required
density or soil condi�ons are not stable.
4. All fills required to bring the building pads to grade should be Engineered Fills.
5. Deeper stripping of the Project Site may be required in localized areas; however, these materials will not be
suitable for use as Engineered Fill. Site stripping should extend to a minimum depth of 2 to 4 inches, or un�l all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed.
6. Imported Fill should consist of well -graded, slightly cohesive, fine silty sand or sandy silt, with rela�vely
impervious characteris�cs when compacted. The
material should be approved by the soils Engineer prior to use and should typically possess the following
characteris�cs (shown in the Geotechnical Report in
Appendix E, on Page 11):
a. Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve: 20 to 50
b. Plas�city Index: 10 Maximum
c. UBC Standard 29 -2 Expansion Index : 15
Maximum
7. U�lity trench backfill placed in or adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs, and pavement areas should be
compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry
density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Pipe
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 22 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
bedding should be in accordance with pipe
manufacturer’s recommenda�ons.
8. The soils engineer has the op�on of rejec�ng any
compacted material regardless of the degree of
compac�on if that material is considered to be unstable or if future instability is suspected.
MM GEO -03- Clearing and Grading Opera�ons : During site clearing and grading opera�ons, a Project Geotechnical Engineer should be present to test and observe earthwork construc�on. In addi�on, during demoli�on ac�vi�es, proper removal of any buried structures or loosely backfilled excava�on s encountered should occur. A�er demoli�on ac�vi�es, disturbed soils should be removed and/or recompacted to stabilize the upper soils and located any unstainable or pliant areas not found during field inves�ga�ons.
During site
clearing and
grading
opera�ons
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -04- Minimize Post-construc�on Soil Movement : To reduce soil movement post -construc�on the following is recommended:
A. Provide uniform support for the buildings and other
founda�ons, overexcava�on and recompac�on within the
proposed building footprint areas should perform a minimum depth of at least five feet below exis�ng grades or two (2) feet below the botom of the proposed founda�on bearing
grades. The over excava�on and re compac�on should
extended laterally five feet (5’) beyond edges of the proposed foo�ngs or building limits.
B. Provide uniform support for the proposed parking and drive area, overexcava�on and recompa c�on of the near surface soil in the proposed parking area should be performed to a minimum depth of at least twelve (12) feet below exi�ng grades or proposed subgrade, whichever is deeper. The over excava�on and re compac�on should also extend laterall y Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 23 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
three feet (3’) beyond edges of the proposed paving limits or the property boundary.
C. The proposed structures may be supported on a shallow founda�on system bearing a minimum of three (3) feet of Engineering Fill and foo�ngs should be a minimum depth of 18 inches below subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower.
MM GEO-05- Concrete Slabs on Grade : Concrete slabs -on-grade should have a minimum of five (5) inches thickness, unless otherwise stated by the Project Structural Engineer, and slabs should be reinforced to reduce crack separa�on and possible ver�cal offset at the cracks. It is recommended that using at least No. 3 reinforcing pads placed on 18 -inch centers are ideal. In addi�on, structures should be underlain by water vapor retarder and installed in accordance with accepted engineering prac�ces.
Specific a � o n f o r i n s t a l l m e n t c a n b e f o u n d i n Appendix E .
Addi�onal measures to prevent moisture vapor intrusion include:
1. Ponding of water should not be allowed adjacent to
structures
2. Over-irriga�on within landscaped areas adjacent to
the structures should not be performed
3. Ven�la�on of the structures (i.e., ven�la�on fans)
is recommended to reduce the accumula�on of
interior moisture
4. During Project Site winteriza�on, placement of
aggregate base and protec�ng exposed soils during
construc�on phase should be performed.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -06- Exterior Floors : Exterior floors should be poured separately in order to act independently of the walls and founda�on system. Addi�onally, exterior finish grades should be sloped a minimum of 2 percent away from all interior slab areas to preclude ponding of water adjacent to the structure.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 24 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
MM GEO-07- U�lity Trenches: U�lity trenches should be excavated according to accepted engineering prac�ce following OSHA (Occupa�onal Safety and Health Administra�on) standards by a contractor experience in such work. Traffic and vibra�on adjacent to trench walls should be red uced; cyclic we�ng and drying of excava�on side slopes should be avoided. Shoring or sloping trench sidewalks may be required within these sandy soils, for they tend to cave in trench wall excava�ons due to their cohesionless nature. The Contactor is r esponsible for removing all water - sensi�ve soils from the trench regardless of the backfill loca�on and compac�on requirements.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -08- Discovery of Groundwater : If groundwater is encountered, the Project Geotechnical Engineer should be no�fied upon its discovery and consulted prior to dewatering the site. In addi�on, if earthwork is performed during or soon a�er periods of precipita�on, the subgrade soils may become saturated or may not respond to densifica�on techniques. The Project Geotechnical Engineers, Krazan & Associates, must be consulted prior to implemen�ng remedial measures to observe the unstable subgrade condi�ons and provide appropriate recommenda�ons.
Upon the
discovery of
groundwater
during Project
construc�on.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-09- Surface Drainage: The ground surface should slope away from the building pad and pavement areas toward
appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices and be in accordance with Sec�on 1804.4 of the 2019 California Building Code to follow the recommended ground surface adjacent to founda�ons, outlined in detail in Appendix E. These grades should be maintained for the life of the Project.
Slots or weep holes should be placed in drop inlets or other surface drainage devices in pavement areas to allow free drainage of adjoining base course materials. Cutoff walls should be installed at pavement edges adjacent to vehicular traffic areas; these walls should extend to a minimum depth of 12 inches below pavement subgrades to limit the amount of seepage water that can infiltrate Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 25 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
the pavements. Where cutoff walls are undesirable subgrade drains can be constructed to transport excess water away from planters to drainage interceptors. If cutoff walls can be successfully used at the site, construc�on of subgrade drains is considered unnecessary.
MM GEO -10- Lateral Distances : During grading and backfilling opera�ons adjacent to any walls, heavy equipment should not be allowed to operate within a lateral distance of 5 feet from the wall, or within a lateral distance equal to the wall height, whichever is greater, to avoid developing excessive lateral pressures. Within this zone, only hand -operated equipment (“whackers,” vibratory plates, or pneuma�c compactors) should be used to compact the backfill soils.
During grading
and backfilling
opera�ons
adjacent to any
walls.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-11- Perforated Pipe: Retaining and/or below grade walls should be drained with either perforated pipe encased in free - draining gravel or a prefabricated system. If a prefabricated drainage system is proposed, a Geotechnical Engineering Firm should review the system for final acceptance prior to installa�on.
Drainage pipes should be placed with perfora�ons down and should discharge in non -erosive manner away from founda�ons and other improvements (outlined in Appendix E ). Patches of geotex�le fabr ic for edge drains, should conform to CalTrans Standard Specifica�ons and should be affixed to the rear wall opening of each weep hole to retard soil piping.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-12- Traffic Indices: Recommenda�ons for light-duty and heavy-duty Portland Cement Concrete Pavement to support dynamic traffic loads are as follows:
Portland Cement Pavement
Light Duty
Traffic
Index
Portland
Cement
Concrete
Class II
Aggregate
Base*
Compacted
Subgrade**
4.5 5.0” -- 12.0”
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 26 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
Heavy Duty
Traffic
Index
Portland
Cement
Concrete
Class II
Aggregate
Base*
Compacted
Subgrade**
7.0 6.5” -- 12.0”
*95% compac�on based on ASTM Test Method D1557 or CAL
216
**95% compac�on based on ASTM Test Method D1557 or CAL
216
***Minimum compressive strength of 3000 psi
MM GEO-13- CBC Parameters: For appropriate seismic design of the structures based on the seismic provisions of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), various parameters are
recommended. See Appendix E , page 16 for the table of CBC parameters.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-14- Infiltra�on Systems : The loca�on of the infla�on systems should not be closer than ten (10) feet as measured laterally from the edge of the adjacent property line, ten (10) feet from the outside edge of any founda�on and five (5) feet from the edge of any right -of way to the outside edges of the infiltra�on system.
If the infiltra�on loca�on is within ten feet (10’) of the proposed founda�on, it is recommended that this infiltra�on system should be impervious from the finished ground surface to a depth that will achieve a diagonal distance of a minimum of ten feet (10’) below the botom of the closest foo�ng in the project.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-15- Sulfate Exposure: : Since the soil sample gathered from the Project Site indicated moderate sulfate exposure value, established by HUD/FHA and CBC, Concrete in contact with soil Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 27 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), iv), b), c) d) Con�nued…
u�lize Type II Cement and should have a comprehensive strength of 4,000 psi and a water to cement ra�on of 0.50.
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
MM GEO -16- Electrical resis�vity: Electrical resis�vity tes�ng of the soil indicates that the onsite soils may have a moderate poten�al for metal loss from electrochemical corrosion process. A qualified corrosion engineer should be consulted regarding the corrosion effects of the onsite soils on underground metal u�li�es.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Qualified Corrosion
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-17- Geotechnical Engineering Monitor: A representa�ve of the Project’s Geotechnical Engineering Firm should be present at the site during the earthwork ac�vi�es to confirm that actual subsurface condi�ons are consistent with the exploratory fieldwork. Acceptance of earthwork construc�on is dependent upon compac�on tes�ng and stability of the material. This representa�ve can also verify that the intent of these
recommenda�ons is incorporated into the project design and construc�on and that grades or staking, have been provided by the Prime Contractor.
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
MM PALEO-01- Paleontological Monitoring Program: Prior to the start of earthwork, a qualified Project Paleontologist shall be retained by the Project applicant to oversee the paleontological monitoring program and shall atend the pre -construc�on mee�ng to consult with Project contractors concerning excava�on schedules, paleontological field techniques, and safety issues. A qualified Project Paleontologist is defined as an individual with an M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology that is experienced with paleontological procedures and techniques, who is knowledgeable in the geology and paleontology of Riverside County, and who has worked as a paleontological mi�ga�on project supervisor for at least one year. In addi�on, a professional repository shall be designated to receive and curate any discove
red fossils. A
professional repository is defined as a recognized paleontological specimen repository (e.g., an AAM -
accredited museum or
university) with a permanent curator and should be capable of Prior to the start
of Project
construc�on and
earthwork
ac�vi�es.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 28 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
f) Con�nued…
storing fossils in a facility with adequate security against the�, loss, damage, fire, pests, and adverse climate condi�ons (e.g., Western Science Center, San Diego Natural History Museum).
MM PALEO -02- Paleontological Monitoring : A paleontological monitor shall be on-site during earthwork in areas mapped as early to middle Pleistocene-age very old alluvial-fan deposits (Qvof; See Appendix D, Figure 3, areas symbolized in red). A paleontological monitor is defined as an individual with a college degree in paleontology or geology who has experience in the recogni�on and salvage of fossil materials. The paleontological monitor shall work under the direc�on of the Project Paleontologist. The paleontological monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed, to avoid construc�on delays, and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Paleontological monitoring may be reduced (e.g., part-�me monitoring or spot-checking) or eliminated, at the discre�on of the Project Paleontologist and in consulta�on with appropriate agencies (e.g., Project proponent, City of Moreno Valley representa�ves). Changes to the paleontological monitoring schedule shall be based on the results of the mi�ga�on program as it unfolds during site development, and current and an�cipated condi�ons in the field.
Throughout
Project
construc�on and
earthwork
ac�vi�es.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM PALEO-03- Discovery of Fossils: If fossils are discovered when the paleontological monitor is or is not on the site at the �me of discovery, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall make an ini�al assessment to determine their significance. iden�fiable vertebrat e fossils (large or small) and uncommon invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils are considered to be significant and shall be recovered (SVP , 2010). Representa�ve samples of common invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils shall also be recovered. Although fossil salvage can o�en be completed in a rela�vely short period of �me, the Project Paleontologist (or Upon the
discovery of
fossils during
Project
construc�on.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 29 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
f) Con�nued…
paleontological monitor) shall be allowed to temporarily direct, divert, or halt earthwork at his or her discre�on during the ini�al assessment phase if addi�onal �me is required to salvage fossils.
If it is determined by the Project Paleontologist tha t the fossil(s) should be recovered, the recovery shall be completed in a �mely manner. Some fossil specimens (e.g., a large mammal skeleton) may require an extended salvage period. Because of the poten�al for the recovery of small fossil remains (e.g., isolated teeth of small vertebrates), it may be necessary to collect bulk-matrix samples for screen washing.
MM PALEO-04- Fossil Remains: Fossil remains collected during monitoring and salvage shall be cleaned, repaired, sorted, taxonomically iden�fied, and cataloged as part of the mi�ga�on program. Fossil prepara�on may also include screen -washing of bulk matrix samples for microfossils or other laboratory analyses (e.g., radiometric carbon da�ng), if warranted in the discre�on of the Pr oject Paleontologist. Fossil prepara�on and cura�on ac�vi�es may be conducted at the laboratory of the contracted Project Paleontologist, at an appropriate outside agency, and/or at the designated repository, and shall follow the standards of the designated repository.
Throughout
paleontological
monitoring at the
Project Site.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM PALEO-05- Writen Repository Agreement : Prepared fossils, along with copies of all per�nent field notes, photos, and maps, shall be curated at a professional repository. The Project Paleontologist shall have a writen repository agreement with the professional repository prior to the ini�a�on of mi�ga�on ac�vi�es.
Upon the
comple�on of
paleontological
monitoring.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM PALEO - 06- Paleontological Resources Report : A final summary report shall be completed at the conclusion of the monitoring and cura�on phases of work and shall summarize the results of the mi�ga�on program. A copy of the paleontological monitoring report shall be submited to the City of Moreno Valley and to the designated museum repository. The report and Upon the
comple�on of
paleontological
monitoring.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 30 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
f) Con�nued… specimen inventory, when submited to the City of Moreno Valley with confirma�on of the cura�on of recovered specimens into an established, accredited repository, shall signify comple�on of the program to mi�gate impacts to palaeontologic resources.
Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
c) Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an
exis�ng or proposed school?
MM HAZ-01- Coordina�on with Val Verdes School District: Prior to issuance of permits and construc�on mobiliza�on for the Project, the Contractor shall provide the construc�on schedule to the Val Verde School District as verified by the grading and/or building inspector prior to grading and demoli�on at the Project Site. The contractor shall coordinate with the school district on an ongoing basis during construc�on and shall keep records of this coordina�on at the Project Site for review by the grad ing and building inspectors.
During Project
construc�on.
Project Builder/
Contractor and City
Inspector.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM HAZ -02- Hazardous Materials Manifest and Plan: Prior to issuance of permits, the contractor shall provide a manifest of construc�on materials and a plan for proper handling, disposal, con�ngency, and emergency response to the building official and fire department for verifica�on of adequate con�ngency measures in regard to poten�ally hazardous materials used, stored and handled onsite during construc�on.
Prior to the
issuance of
permits and
throughout
construc�on.
Project Contractor and
City Inspectors.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substan�ally degrade surface or
ground water quality?
MM HYDRO-01- Water Quality Best Management Prac�ces: Upon Project implementa�on, the maintenance of water quality is the responsibility of the property owner, which was disclosed within a statement of compliance prior to the purchase from the builder.
The Homeowners Associa�on (HOA) and City or County ar e responsible for enforcing the Water Quality Management Plan if the resident is not adhering to the following
WQMP best
management prac�ces and requirements:
Permanent Structural Source Control BMPs:
1. A t t h e l o c a � o n o f d r a i n a g e i n l e t s , i n s t a l l s t o r m d r a i n markers “Only Rain Down the Drain/ Drains to Lake”.
Upon Project
implementa�on.
Property Owners,
Homeowner’s
Associa�on
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 31 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) con�nued…
2. Implement a landscaping plan that will achieve the
following:
a. Preserve exis�ng na�ve trees, shrubs, and
groundcover to the maximum extent possible.
b. Design landscaping to minimize irriga�on and
runoff, to promote surface infiltra�on and
runoff where appropriate, and to minimize the
use of fer�lizers and pes�cides that can
contribute to stormwater pollu�on.
c. Where landscaped areas are used to retain or
detain stormwater, specify plants that are
tolerant of saturated soil condi�ons.
d. Consider using pest -resistant plants,
especially adjacent to hardscape.
e. To ensure successful establishment, select
plants appropriate to site soils, slopes,
climate, sun, wind, rain, land use, air
movement, ecological consistency, and plant
interac�ons.
3. HOA CC&Rs shall outline where site refuse and recycled materials will be handled and stored for pickup. If
dumpsters or other receptables are outdoors, state how
the designated area will be covered, graded, and paved to prevent run -on and show loca�ons of berms to prevent
r u n o ff f r o m t h e a r e a . S i g n s w i l l b e p o s t e d o n o r n e a r dumpsters sta�ng “Do not dump hazardous materials
here" or similar.
4. Cover outdoor storage areas; grade and berm outdoor
storage areas to prevent run-on or run-off from area.
5. Storage of non-hazardous liquids shall be covered by a roof and/or drain to the sanitary sewer system, and be
contained by berms, dikes, liners, or vaults.
6. Storage of hazardous materials and waste must be in
compliance with the local hazardous materials ordinance and a Hazardous Materials Management Plan for the site.
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 32 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) con�nued…
7. A detailed descrip�on of materials stored within storage area and structural features shall be provide by the
Property owner to prevent pollutants from entering storm drains.
8. Provide a means to drain fire sprinkler test water to the sanitary sewer.
9. Roo�op equipment with poten�al to produce pollutants shall be roofed and/or have secondary containment.
10. Avoid roofing, guters, and trim made of copper or other unprotected metals that may leach into runoff.
Opera�onal Source Control BMPs:
1. Maintain and periodically repaint or replace inlet
markings.
2. Provide stormwater pollutant preven�on informa�on to new site owners, lessees, or operators.
3. Maintain landscaping using minimum or no pes�cides.
4. Provide an adequate number of receptacles. Inspect
receptacles regularly; repair or replace leaky
receptacles. Keep receptacles covered.
5. Prohibit/ Prevent dumping of liquid of hazardous wastes.
Post “no hazardous materials” signs. Inspect and pick up liter daily and clean up spills immediately. Keep spill control materials available on-site.
Sweep plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots regularly to prevent accumula�on of liter and debris. Collect debris from pressure washing to prevent entry into the storm drain system. Collect wash water containing any cleaning agent or degreaser and discharge to the sanitary sewer not to a storm drain.
Noise
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established
Best Management Prac�ces
BMP NOI -01- Construc�on Noise Best Management Praci�ces :
Best management prac�ces to alleviate construc�on noise sources include the following:
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
City of Moreno Valley
and Project contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 33 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Noise
in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
a) Continued…
• All construc�on equipment whether fixed or mobile, will be equipped with properly opera�ng and maintained
mufflers, consistent with manufacturer standards.
• All sta�onary construc�on equipment will be placed so that emited noise is directed away from the noise
sensi�ve receptors nearest the project site.
• As applicable, all equipment shall be shut off when not in use.
• Equipment staging in areas shall be located to create the greatest distance between construc�on -related
noise/vibra�on sources and exis�ng sensi�ve receptors.
• Jackhammers, pneuma�c equipment, and all other
portable sta�onary noise sources will be directed away
and shielded from exis�ng residences in the vicinity of the project site. Either one- inch plywood or sound
blankets can be u�lized for this purpose. T hey should
reach up from the ground and block the line of sight
between equipment and exis�ng residences. The
shielding should be without holes and cracks.
• No amplified music and/or voice will be allowed on the project site.
• Haul truck deliveries will not occur outside of the hours presented as exempt for construc�on per Sec�ons
8.14.040 and 11.80.030(D)(7) of the City of Moreno
Valley’s Municipal Code.
and grading
permits.
b) Genera�on of excessive
groundborne vibra�on or
groundborne noise levels?
BMP NOI-02- Groundborne Vibra�on Best Management Prac�ces:
In order to minimize the impacts of groundborne vibra�on related to architectural damage, the following best management prac�ces have been suggested by the Project’s Noise Specialist:
Throughout
Project
construc�on
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 34 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Noise
b) Con�nued… • Limit the use of vibratory roller within 26 feet or a large bulldozer within 15 feet of the exis�ng residen�al
structures to the east of the Project Site to avoid
significant impacts.
Public Services
and U�li�es
a) Result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of
the public services:
iii) Schools?
iv) Other facili�es?
Reference Mitigation Measure MM TRAF-01 through MM TRAF -
03. Prior to the
issuance of the
final tract map
and permits and
Project
construc�on.
City Building Official,
Project
Developer/Builder,
Project Traffic
Engineer
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM PUB-01- School Fees: Prior to the issuance of the final tract map and permits, City Building Official shall verify that the Developer/Builder has paid required school fees to the City based on square footage of new structures for mitigation of impacts from increased enrollment. Payment of the Development Impact Fee.
Prior to the
issuance of the
final tract map
and permits and
Project
construc�on.
City Building Official,
Project
Developer/Builder.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Transporta�on
c) Substan�ally increase hazards
due to a geometric design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersec�ons) or
incompa�ble uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
MM TRAF-01- Signing/ striping and Traffic Control Improvements:
All construc�on plans for roadway design, signing/striping, and traffic control improvements rela�ng to the proposed project shall be submited to City of Moreno Valley Public Works Department for approval and constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards prior to issuance of permits for the Project.
Prior to the start
of construc�on.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM TRAF -02- Sight Distance Standards: The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met in accordance with applicable City of Moreno Valley, na�onal or state sight distance standards prior to issuance of permits. It is recommended that the landscape plan for the site should u�lize the sight distance principals to avoid placing obstruc�ons (such as dense trees or monument signs) within the limited use area on either side of proposed proje ct access driveways.
Prior to the start
of construc�on.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 35 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Transporta�on
c) Continued… MM TRAF-03- Traffic Control Plan: A construc�on work site traffic control plan shall be submited to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit or start of any construc�on work. If applicable, the plan shall iden�fy any roadway closures, shoulder closures, detours or flagging opera�on as well as hours of opera�on. All construc�on related trips shall be restricted to off-peak hours to the extent possible.
Prior to the start
of construc�on.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
Reference MM TRAF-03- Traffic Control Plan. Prior to the start of construc�on.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Tribal Cultural
Resources
a) Cause a substan�al adverse
change in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code Sec�on 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a
California Na�ve American tribe, and
that is:
i) Listed or eligible for lis�ng
in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in
a local register of historical
resources as defined in
Public Resources Code
Sec�on 5020.1(k), or
See MM CUL-02: Na�ve American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit
Project Developer/
Applicant, City
Planning Division,
Na�ve American
Monitor, Project
contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
See MM CUL-03: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP).
Prior to Project
construc�on and
the issuance of
building permits.
Project Archaeologist,
in consulta�on with
the Consul�ng
Tribe(s), the principal
contractor, and the
City
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
See MM CUL-04: Cultural Resources Disposi�on.
Upon the
discovery of
Na�ve American
cultural resources
during ground
disturbing
ac�vi�es at the
Project Site.
Project archeologist,
City Planning Division,
Project Developer/
Applicant, Na�ve
American monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 36 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Tribal Cultural
Resources
a) ii) A resource determined by the
lead agency, in its discre�on and
supported by substan�al evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code sec�on 5024.1 . In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code sec�on 5024.1 , the lead
agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Na�ve American tribe.
See MM CUL-05 Grading Plan. Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit.
Project archeologist,
City Planning Division,
Project Developer/
Applicant
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
See MM CUL-06 Inadvertent Finds.
Upon the
discovery of
history or cultural
resources during
Project
construc�on and
earthwork
ac�vi�es.
Project archeologist,
City Planning Division,
Project Developer/
Applicant
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
U�li�es and
Services
a) Require or result in the reloca�on
or construc�on of new or expanded
water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric
power, natural gas, or
telecommunica�ons facili�es, the
construc�on or reloca�on of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
MM UTL-01- U�lity Purveyor Approval: Prior to issuance of final tract map approval and permits, the City Building Official shall verify that improvement plans for u�lity extensions and connec�ons and service to the structures are approved by each u�lity purveyor.
Prior to the
issuance of final
tract map
approval and
permits.
City Building Official,
U�lity Purveyors
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry,
and mul�ple dry years?
MM UTL -01: EMWD Water Conserva�on Policies : P r i o r t o fi n a l tract map approval and issuance of permits the City Engineer and Planning Department shall verify that EMWD Water Conserva�on Policies are incorporated within the Project’s CC&R’s and construc�on plan set per the following:
i) Irrigate landscape only between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. except when:
o Manually watering;
o Establishing new landscape;
o Temperatures are predicted to fall below freezing;
or
o It is very short period of �me to adjust or repair
an irriga�on system.
Prior to final tract
map approval and
issuance of
permits from the
City Engineer and
Planning
Department.
City Engineer , City
Planning Division,
Project Developer/
Applicant
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
SOUTH OF IRIS PROJECT
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
PAGE 37 of 37
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
U�li�es and
Services
b) Con�nued…
ii) Unatended irriga�on systems using potable water are prohibited unless they are limited to no more than 15 minutes watering per day, per sta�on. This limita�on can be extended for:
o Very low flow drip irriga�on systems when no
emiter produces more than two gallons of water
per hour.
o Weather based controllers or stream rotor
sprinklers that meet 70 percent efficiency.
o Runoff or over watering is not permited in any
case.
iii) Irriga�on systems operate efficiently and avoid overwatering or watering of hardscape and the resul�ng runoff.
iv) Excessive water flow or runoff is prohibited
v) Install new landscaping with low -water demand trees and plants. New turf shall only be installed for func�onal purposes.
vi) Watering during rain is prohibited.
Long-term maintenance of items a) through f) above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
Wildfire
c) Require the installa�on or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other u�li�es) that
may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
MM WILD -01: HOA Fire Safety - To ensure fire safety and appropriate emergency response, the Homeowner’s Associa�on shall incorporate requirements within the recorded CC&Rs that require property owners to keep the side yard setbacks free and clear of debris year-round.
Long-term maintenance of above requirement shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
Prior to the
finaliza�on of
HOA CC&Rs.
Property owner, HOA
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.l
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 :
Exhibit C
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J.1.m
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley on the date and time set forth below:
Project: General Plan Amendment (PEN22-0159)
Change of Zone (PEN22-0158)
Tentative Tract Map 38458 (PEN22-0156)
Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0157)
Project Applicant: David Patton
Property Owners: South of Iris 2021, LLC
APN: 316-030-002, 018 and 019
Location: South side of Iris Avenue, east of Indian Street Proposal: A General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone to change the Land Use Designation and Zoning District Classification of a n approximate 9.42-acre project site from R5 Residential to R10 Residential and from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single -Family 10 (RS10) District, respectfully, and Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map 38458 for a Planned Unit Development comprised of 78 detached single -family residences with a privately maintained and publicly available tot lot, dog park, and the required site improvements.
Council District: 4
Environmental Determination: The project has been evaluated as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines. An Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ha ve been prepared for this project. An Initial Study was circulated for public review (including interested parties/responsib le agencies) from December 29, 2023 , through January 29 , 202 4 (State Clearinghouse Schedule No. 2023120763). The Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program can be obtained in electric format via email by request. The final document(s) may be inspected by appointment at the Community Development Department at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California, by calling (951) 413-3206 during normal business hours (7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Friday). The documents may also be reviewed on the City’s website at http://www.moreno- valley.ca.us/cdd/documents/about-projects.html.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY: All interested parties will be provided an opportunity to submit oral testimony during the public hearing and/or provide written testimony during or prior to or at the public hearing. The application file and related environmental documents may be inspected at the Community Development Department at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California during normal business hours (7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Friday). More information can be found on the Agenda, which will be posted on the City’s website at least 72 hours prior to the meeting http://morenovalleyca.iqm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx PLEASE NOTE: The City Council may consider and approve changes to the proposed items under consideration during the Public Hearing.
GOVERNMENT CODE § 65009 NOTICE: If you challenge any of the proposed actions taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley during or prior to the Public Hearing.
ACCESSIBILITY: Upon request and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to James Verdugo, ADA Coordinator, a t (951) 413-3350 at least 72 hours before the meeting. The 72-hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Date and Time: March 5, 2024, at 6:00 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chamber
14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Planner: Oliver Mujica, Contract Planner
Contact: (951) 413-3206 or [email protected]
Press-Enterprise February 23, 2024
Robert Flores Newspaper Date of Publication
Planning Division Manager / Official
Community Development Department
J.1.m
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a MND - South of Iris [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH 1 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2024-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT ING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PEN2 3-0072),
CHANGE OF ZONE (PEN2 3-0071), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(PEN23-0070), AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38702 (PEN23-0069) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 131 UNIT DETACHED SINGLE -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER
OF GOYA AVENUE AND INDIAN STREET (APN: 316-020-020, 021, 022, 023, 024 AND 025)
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and the L ead Agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for local projects that are subject to requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA 1) and CEQA Guidelines2; and
WHEREAS, David Patton, Mark Patton, Tracey Duesler, and Michael and Karen Patton (“Applicants”) have submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment (PEN23-0072), Change of Zone (PEN23 -0071), Conditional Use Permit (PEN2 3-0070), and Tentative Tract Map 38702 (PEN23-0069) for the development of a 131 unit detached single-family residential project with associated amenities and public improvements (“Proposed Project”) on 13.73 acres located on the southeast corner of Goya Avenue and Indian Street (APN: 316-020-020, 021, 022, 023, 024, and 025) (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, Planning Division Staff completed an Initial Study ( “Environmental Assessment”) for the Proposed Project and based on the Environmental Assessment, recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) in accordance with Section 6 (ND Procedures) of the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the requirements of CEQA the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070–15075; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was duly noticed and circulated for public review for a period of t hirty (30) days commencing on December 29, 2023, through January 29, 2024; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a MMRP, which is a program for monitoring and reporting on the Proposed Project’s mitigation measures was prepared for the Proposed Project and circulated with the MND; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2024, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2024-07
1 Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177
2 14 California Code of Regulations §§15000-15387
J.1.n
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH 2 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
recommending that the City Council certify and adopt the MND and the M MRP for the Proposed Project, and the Planning Commission adopt ed Resolution No. 202 4-08 (PEN23-0072), Resolution No. 2024-09 (PEN23-0071), and Resolution No. 2024-10 (PEN23-0069 and PEN23- 0070) recommending that the City Council approve the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, on March 5 , 2024, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the City Council to consider the MND and the MMRP for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, in the exercise of its own independent judgment, the City Council determined that the MND and the MMRP prepared for the Proposed Project will reduce the potential environmental impact of the Proposed Project to levels of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will significantly affect the environment in a manner that otherwise would require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached E xhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.
Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all of the evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the MND and MMRP, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Proposed Project, attached hereto as Exhibits A and B;
(b) Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit C;
(c) Planning Division Staff Report prepared for the City Council’s consideration and all documents, records , and references related thereto, and Planning Division Staff’s presentation at the public hearing; and (d) Testimony, comments , and correspondence from all persons that were provided at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Section 3. Findings
That based on the content of the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council makes the following findings:
J.1.n
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH 3 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
(a) That all environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, with the mitigation measures set forth in the MMRP, have been reduced to level s of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment that would otherwise require the preparation and certification of an Environmental Impact Report;
(b) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and are consistent with the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; (c) That t he Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council and the City as the lead agency for the Proposed Project; and (d) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are adequate to serve as the required CEQA environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.
Section 4. Adoption
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record and Findings, as set forth herein, the City Council hereby adopts the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively.
Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 6. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
J.1.n
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH 4 Resolution No. 2024-XX
March 5, 2024
Section 8. Certification
That the City Clerk of the City Council shall certify to the passage of this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 5th DAY OF MARCH 2024.
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL
_____________________________________
Ulises Cabrera,
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
_____________________________________________
Jane Halstead,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla,
City Attorney
Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit C: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration J.1.n
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-XX - IS/MND - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 2] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH
Exhibit A
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND)
FOR GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
PEN23-0073
General Plan Amendment (PEN22-0159),Change
of Z
one (PEN22-0158),Tentative Tract Map 38458
(PEN22-0156),
Conditional Use Permit
(PEN22-0157)
December 2023
Lead Agency
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Prepared By
ARDURRA GROUP
Lori Duca Trottier, AICP CEP
3737 Birch Street, Ste 250
Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-235 -3094
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park i City of Moreno Valley
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................ 1
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ............................................................... 34
3.0 DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) ................................................................. 34
4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................................................ 35 I. AESTHETICS .......................................................................................................................... 73 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESCOURCES ........................................................... 83 III. AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................... 87 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................. 100 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 115 VI. ENERGY ........................................................................................................................... 121 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................................................... 125 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................... 137 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................... 143 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project: ........................................... 154 XI. LAND US
E AND PLANNING ............................................................................................ 165 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project: ................................................................. 174 XIII. NOISE ........................................................................................................................... 175 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING ..................................................................................... 185 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ...................................................................................................... 188 XVI. RECREATION ............................................................................................................... 193 XVII.
TRANSPORTATION ..................................................................................................... 197 XVIII
. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................. 209 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 212 XX. WILDFIRE ..................................................................................................................... 218 XXI. MAND
ATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................ 221 FIG
URES
Figure 1: Regional Location Map .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Map ......................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4: Zoning Map .................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Photo Location Map ....................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 6: Site Photos ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7: Site Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 8: Landscape Plan ........................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 9: Elevations .................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 10: Floor Plans ................................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 11: Tentative Tract Map ................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 12: Boring Locations ...................................................................................................................... 132 Figure 13: Grading Plan ............................................................................................................................ 160 Figure 14: Noise Measurement Location Map .......................................................................................... 181 Figure 15: Traffic Study Area .................................................................................................................... 205 Figure 16: Proposed and Existing Utility Lines ......................................................................................... 214 TABLE
S
Table 1: Surrounding Adjacent Land Uses ................................................................................................... 7 Table 2: Existing Diverse Uses Within 1-Mile of the Project Site ................................................................ 12 Table 3: Floor Plan Dimensions .................................................................................................................. 16 Table 4: Project Elevations ......................................................................................................................... 16 Table 5: Moreno Valley Cumulative Projects List ....................................................................................... 19 Table 6: Federal and State Pollutant Standards ......................................................................................... 91 Table 7: SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ............................................................................. 92 Table 8: Construction Related Regional Pollutant Emissions..................................................................... 94 Table 9: Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day ............................................................................ 94 Table 10:
Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors ........................................................... 94 Table 11: Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions .................................................................................. 95 Table 12: Potentially Occurring Special Status Biological Resources ...................................................... 104 Table 13: Project Consistency with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 113 J.1.o
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park ii City of Moreno Valley
Table 14: Cultural Resources Summary ................................................................................................... 116 Table 15: Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................... 138 Table 16: Project Consistency with Applicable GHG Reduction Plans and Policies ................................ 139 Table 17: Project Consistency with the City’s General Plan Safety Element ........................................... 150 Table 18: Identification of Receiving Waters............................................................................................. 156 Table 19: 2006 General Plan and 2021 General Plan Update: Land Use and Housing Element ............ 166 Table 20: Project Consistency with Existing Zoning (2040 General Plan R5 Single Family Residential Zone) ......................................................................................................................................................... 172 Table 21: Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) ....................................................................................... 177 Table 22: Construction Vibration Levels at the Nearest Receptor ............................................................ 183 Table 23: Val Verde Unified School District Student Generation Rates ................................................... 190 Table 24: Project Open Space Areas ....................................................................................................... 194 Table 25: Project Consistency with General Plan Park Requirements ..................................................... 195 Table 26: Level of Service (LOS) .............................................................................................................. 198 Table 27: Existing Study Area Level of Service ........................................................................................ 199 Table 28: Project Trip Generation Rates .................................................................................................. 201 Table 29: Traffic Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................ 202 Table 30: Project Consistency with General Plan Circulation Element Policies and Goals ..................... 204 Table 31: Forecast Daily Trips on Goya Avenue ...................................................................................... 207 MIT
IGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
APP
ENDICES (Separate Documents)
Appendix A - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study/Energy Report (Ganddini 2023) Appendix B- Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis (ELMT Consulting 2023)
Appendix C - Cultural/Archaeological/Tribal/Paleontology (BCR Consulting 2023) Appendix D - Soils and Geotechnical (Krazen & Associates 2023) Appendix E - Preliminary Project Specific Water Quality Management and Preliminary Drainage Report (Greenberg Farrow 2023)
Appendix F - Preliminary Drainage and Hydrology Report (Greenberg Farrow 2023) Appendix G - Transportation Study Screening Assessment & VMT Impact Analysis; Traffic Impact Analysis; Trip Forecasts for Goya Avenue (Ganddini 2023) Appendix H - Noise Study (Ganddini 2023)
Appendix I - Planned Unit Development Guidelines: Heritage Park (T&B Planning 2023) J.1.o
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 1 City of Moreno Valley
DRAFT
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (IS/MND) FOR
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
(PEN23-0073)
1.0 BACKGRO
UND INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Project Case Number(s): Tentative Tract Map: PEN23-0069 Planned Unit Development: PEN23-0070
Change of Zone: PEN23-0071
General Plan Amendment: PEN23-0072
2. Project Title: Goya at Heritage Park
3. Public Comment Period: Pursuant to Section 15105(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has established a 30-day public view period, beginning on December 29, 2023, and ending January 29, 2024. Written comments on the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration must be received by the City o
f Moreno Valley Community Development Department no later than the conclusion of the 30- day review period, 5:30 p.m. on January 29, 2024.
4. Lead Agency:
City of Moreno Valley
Commun
ity Development Department
Oliver Mujica, Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92553
(951) 413-3206
planni [email protected]
5. Docum
ents Posted At: https://www.moval.org/cdd/documents/about-projects.html
6. Prepared By: Lori Duca Trottier, AICP CEP
Riley Christie, ENV SP, LEED AP ND
ARDURRA
GROUP
3737 Birch Suite 250
949-235-3094
[email protected]
7. Project Sponsor:
Applicant/Developer Property Owner
David Patton David Patton
South of Goya LLC South of Goya LLC
41 Corporate Park Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92606
41 Corporate Park Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 852-0266 (949) 852-0266
[email protected] [email protected]
8. Project Location: The Project Site is comprised of six parcels: Accessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 316-020-020, -021, -022, -023, -024, and -025 totaling 13.73 gross acres. The western perimeter of the Project Site borders Indian Street and is approximately 1,584 feet south of the southeast corner of the Iris Avenue/Indian Street intersection. From the easterly terminus of Goya Avenue, the Project Site is approximately 2,112 feet from Krameria Avenue, a minor arterial that J.1.o
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 2 City of Moreno Valley
leads to Perris Boulevard, a major arterial in the east. The Project Site is located within the western portion of the City of Moreno Valley, northwestern Riverside County, California. Major highways within the Project’s Vicinity include Interstate 215 (I-215), approximately 4.2 miles northwest of the Project Site, State Route 60 (SR-60), approximately 4.3 miles north of the Project Site, and State Route 74 (SR-74), approximately 13.5 miles southeast of the Project Site (See Figure 1: Regional Location Map).
The Project Site is located at Latitude 33.884021 °N/ Longitude -117.233334°W within primarily an urbanized area and is approximately 1,497 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) (See Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map).
9. General Plan Designation: The Project Site is designated R5, Residential: Maximum density of 5 dwelling units per acre (5 DU/AC). (Reference Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Map)
10. Specific Plan Name and Designation: The Project is not in a Specific Plan Area.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK <Double-click here to enter title>
Legend
Limited Access
Highway
County Line
Cities
<all other values>
Name
Beaumont
Calimesa
Moreno Valley
Perris
Riverside
Hydrography Area
Parks
<Double-click here to enter text>
Riverside
Moreno Valley
Calimesa
Perris
Beaumont
§¨¦215
§¨¦10
UV60
UV91
UV60
60 Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community ^_
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar
Geographics, and the GIS User Community
^ _Project Site
^ _
Project Site
§¨¦
215
60 City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 1. Regional Location Map
0 1 2 3 40.5
Miles
Moreno Valley
City Limits
Lake Perris State Recreation Area
¯
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
The Badlands
Box Spring Mountains
Project Site
Legend
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK NEIGHBORHOODS I AND II, SOUTH OF IRIS AND GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK) n
n
Rainbow Ridge
Elementary School
Moreno Valley Industrial Area
INDIAN STREET
î
PERRIS BLVD
EMMA LN
Centerpointe Business Park
IRIS AVENUE î
îGOYA AVE
March Middle School
MORENO VALLEY
!(
!(
!(
!(1
3 12
!(16
!(6
9 !(13 !(14
!(15
!(2
!(11
!(7
!(8
!(5 !(10
!(4
MARCH AIR
RESERVE BASE
KRAMERIA AVE.
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community 4 Legend
Moreno Valley City Limits
Interstate
Parks
Hydrography Area
Cities
<all other values>
Name
Moreno Valley
Perris
City Boundary
Figure 2. Local Vicinity Map
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Industrial Development
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
Miles ¯
Project Site
City of Moreno Valley Cumulative
Development Projects
Legend
!(
Centerpointe Business
Park
î Church
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya Ave.
Project Site
Iris Ave. Iris Ave. Iris Ave.
Heacock St. Heacock St.
Indian St. Indian St. Indian St.
Perris Blvd. Perris Blvd.
Emma Ln. Emma Ln.
MARCH AIR
RESERVE BASE
MORENO VALLEY
Krameria Ave.
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community 0 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.60.075
Miles ¯
Legend
Moreno Valley City Limits
LandUse
LULabels
Business Park/ Light Industrial
Commerical
Corridor Mixed Use
Public Facility
R10 Residential
R30 Residential
R5 Residential (Project Site)
Project Site
Local Streets
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 3. General Plan Land Use Map
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Iris Ave. Iris Ave. Iris Ave.
Heacock St. Heacock St.
Indian St. Indian St. Indian St.
Perris Blvd. Perris Blvd.
Emma Ln.
MARCH AIR
RESERVE BASE
MORENO VALLEY
Iris Ave.
Goya Ave.
Project Site Krameria Ave.
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community¯ Legend
GENLANDUSE
Business Flex
Center Mixed Use
Commercial
Corridor Mixed Use
Downtown Center
Highway Office/Commercial
Industrial/Business Park
Large Lot Residential
Multi-family
Office
Open Space/Park
Public Facilities
Residential 2 Dwellings/Acre
Residential Agriculture 2 Dwellings/Acre
Suburban Residential (Project Site)
Moreno Valley City Limits
Local Streets
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 4. Zoning Map
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.20.15
Miles
Project Site
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Goya at Heritage Park Page 7 City of Moreno Valley
11. Existing Zoning: The Project Site is zoned for single-family residential (R 5) land use, which allows up to five (5) residential dwelling units per acre. (See Figure 4: Zoning Map).
12. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: As shown in Si te Photos (See Figure 5: Photo Location Map and Figure 6A through 6D: Site Photos), parcels adjacent to the east and north of the Project Site are currently undeveloped. However, parcels in all other directions are urbanized with
a variety of land uses. Table 1: Surrounding Adjacent Land Uses summarizes the surrounding adjacent
land uses and development within the Local Vicinity.
Directly south, north and east, the Project Site is bordered by single-f amily residences and undevelo
ped land planned for residential development. The Project Site’s southeastern corner borders an established residential community with approximately 56 single-f amily detached homes which ar
e accessible via Emma Lane and Krameria Avenue. Property to the west of Indian Street is develope
d with industrial and commercial buildings with light industrial and commercial businesses operating there.
East of the Project Site, approximately 3,168 feet east from the Project Site, is Perris Boulevard, a major arterial and planned Mixed Use Corridor within the City. Numerous commercial retail and service businesses line this arterial and are within walking distance of the Project.
TABL
E 1: SURROUNDING ADJACENT LAND USES
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Project Site Vacant and single-
family residential
R5 Residential (R5) District
North (Across
Goya Avenue)
Nort
hwest
No
rtheast
Planned single-family
residential
developments;
La I
glesia Misionera
Cristiana (Church)
Single-Family Homes
R5/10 (Planned
Development)
R5
R5
R5 Residential
R5 R
esidential
R5 R
esidential
South Single-family residential R5 R5 Residential
East Vacant, undeveloped R5 R5 Residential
West
(Across Indian
Street)
Warehouses (P&G
Distribution, Keeco, etc.)
BP- Specific Plan Area
208 I
BP Business Park/ Light
Industrial
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya Avenue
Smoke Tree Pl
Indian Street Indian Street
Goya Avenue 1, 2, 3
Emma LaneEmma Lane
4 5, 6, 7
8, 9, 10
11 12, 13, 14
15, 16
17 18,
19, 20
21, 22,
23, 24
25, 26
27 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 5. Photo Location Map
¯
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.120.015
Miles
Legend
Monitoring Wells
Drainage Inlet
Project Site
Unpaved Goya Avenue ROW
Picture Direction
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 6. Site Photos
Photo 1 : From the northeastern corner of
the Project Site, along Goya Avenue, looking
southwest.
Photo 2: From the northwestern corner of
the Project Site, along Goya Avenue, looking
towards the eastern boundary of the Project
Site.
Photo 3 : From the northeastern corner of
the Project Site, along Goya Avenue, looking
west towards the northern boundary of the
Project Site.
Photo 4: From the terminus of Goya
Avenue, along the northern perimeter of
the Project Site, looking west.
Photo 5 : Looking West towards monitoring
wells located along an unpaved portion o f
Goya Avenue.
Photo 6: Looking south towards monitoring
well: RBMWO3A located along the unpaved
portion of Goya Avenue.
Photo 7: Looking south towards monitoring
well: RBMWO3B located along the
unpaved portion of Goya Avenue.
Photo 8: Looking north towards vacant
land proposed for residential development
from the center of the Project Site along
Goya Avenue.
Photo 9 : Looking west towards Indian
Street from unpaved Go ya Avenue , the
central portion of the Project Site ’s
northern boundary.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 6A. Site Photos
Photo 10: From the central portion of the
Project Site ’s northern boundary , along an
unpaved portion of Goya Ave. looking south.
Photo 11: Looking north towards eucalyptus
trees along a portion of unpaved Goya Avenue
from the Project’s northern boundary.
Photo 12: Looking west towards Indian
Street from unpaved Goya Avenue at the
Goya Avenue and Indian Street intersection.
Photo 13: Looking north towards Indian
Street and Iris Avenue intersection from
Goya Avenue and Indian Street intersection.
Photo 14: Looking south towards the
Project Site’s western boundary from Goya
Avenue and Indian Street intersection.
Photo 15: Looking southwest towards the
Project Site from the site ’s northwestern
corner.
Photo 16: Looking east towards un paved
Goya Avenue and the Project ’s northern
boundary from the sit e’s northwestern
corner.
Photo 17: From Indian Street looking east
towards an existing drainage inlet along the
western boundary of the Project Site.
Photo 18: From Indian Street looking north
towards an existing drainage inlet along the
western boundary of the Project Site.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 6B. Site Photos
Photo 19: Looking east towards the Project
Site and eastern mountain ranges from
Indian Street.
Photo 20: Looking west towards commercial
infrastructure from Indian Street.
Photo 21: Looking east towards the Project
Site and mountain ranges from the Project
Site’s southwestern corner.
Photo 22: Looking northwest towards the
Project Site from the site ’s southwestern
corner along Indian Street.
Photo 23: Looking south towards Indian
Street from the site’s southwestern corner.
Photo 24: Looking north towards Indian
Street from the site ’s southwestern co rner
along Indian Street.
Photo 25: Looking south from Goya Avenue
towards concrete debris at the Project Site
adjacent to the northern Project boundary.
Photo 26: Looking southwest from Goya
Avenue towards concrete debris at the
Project Site along northern site boundary.
Photo 27: Looking north from Goya Avenue
towards res idential development ad jacent
to Goya Avenue and Smoke Tree Place
intersection.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 12 City of Moreno Valley
13. De
scription of the Site and Project:
Environmental Setting
The Project is proposed in an urbanized area near the western boundary of the Moreno Valley City Limits on 13.67 net acres (13.73 gross acres ) of vacant land. The Project Site has a gentle slope towards the south and is void of most vegetation. There are trees growing along the north perimeter of the Project Site near Indian Street within the planned right-of-way for Goya Avenue. The westerly terminus of the improved portion of Goya Avenue is at the northeast corner of the Project Site and planned right-of-way for continuation of Goya Avenue, through westerly to Indian Street, is along the entire northern Project boundary. Improved right-of-way for Indian Street, consisting of paved lanes and surface drainage, border the Project Site along the entire westerly Project boundary. The Project Site is approved for low density residential (R5) development according to the City’s Land Use Map (See Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Map).
The L
ocal Vicinity surrounding the Project Site consists of a mixture of developed residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional land use as well as vacant parcels, which are planned for residential development (detached single- family residences and apartments) . Vacant parcels are located adjacent to the east and north of the Project Site. Likewise, vacant parcels are southeast, north, and northeast of the Project in the L ocal Vicinity. The existing development adjacent to the Project Site consists primarily of single-family residences and churches. Commercial and industrial businesses line the western perimeter of Indian Street, west of the Project Site. In addition, commercial and retail centers are located east of the Project along Perris Boulevard. There are two schools in the Local Vicinity north of Iris Avenue. The Project Site is within 1 -mile of approximately 10 diverse use business types
1 (See Table 2: Existing Diverse Uses within 1-Mile of the Project Site).
March Air Reserve Base is located approximately two (2) miles west of the Project. Perris Lake is located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of the Project Site.
TABLE 2: EXISTING DIVERSE USES WITHIN 1-MILE OF THE PROJECT SITE Category Diverse Use Type Establishment Distance from Project Site (miles)
Food Retail Supermarket/ Grocery
Store
Mr. Yuu 0.8
Kings Market & Smoke 0.8
Community-
serving retail
Hardware Store Home Depot 0.6
Pharmacy Walgreens 0.8
Services Gym Fitness 19 0.7
Dry Cleaner Rolling Ridge Cleaners 0.7
Restaurant Farmer Boys 0.6
Papa’s Indian Grill 0.7
IHOP 0.7
Taqueria La Faena 0.7
Civic and
community
facilities
Public Library Moreno Valley Public
Library- Iris Plaza Branch
0.6 Educational facility Rainbow Ridge Elementary
School
0.3 March Middle School 0.4
Place of Worship Imani Praise Fellowship 0.3
Maarlene Church 0.3
Public Park/ Recreational
Trail
Juan Bautista Trail 0.7
Santiago Park 0.7
His
torical aerials of the Local Vicinity dated prior to 1978 indicate the Project Site was used for agriculture, along with adjacent parcels within the Local Vicinity. Aerials taken in 1985 show scattered low-density residential development and primarily agricultural land use at the Project Site and in the Local Vicinity. Aerials of the Local Vicinity beginning in 1997 show urbanization surrounding the 1 Diverse Use Business Types are defined in Part 18 of this section as publicly available businesses and entities providing goods or services intended to meet daily needs.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 13 City of Moreno Valley
Project Site. (See “Historic Aerials of Indian Street at Goya Avenue, City of Moreno Valley, CA.” (1966 through 2000). In Historic Aerials Netronline. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer).
Existing access to the Project Site is from Goya Avenue planned right-of-way, which is currently a dirt road along the northerly property line of the Project Site. Improved sidewalks, streetlights, curbs and driveways are near the Project Site and are not present at the Project Site. Consistent with other improvements, which have not been established at the Project Site, utilities including sewer, water, electricity, etc. are available nearby and not fully extended to the Project Site. Plans to extend main lines of utilities as well as curb, gutter and sidewalk and other required public improvements are part of the planned improvements proposed with the Project.
Purpose and Scope
In accordance with Section 15365 of the CEQA Guidelines , City of Moreno Valley Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Moreno Valley, July 2019), and City of Moreno Valley Initial Study Preparation Guidelines (Moreno Valley, August 2019), this Initial Study provides analysis identifying the appropriate level of CEQA review for the Project , whether an EIR or Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration must be prepared for the Project. (See “City of Moreno Valley CEQA Document Preparation” in City of Moreno Valley Community Development Department Website
https://www.moval.org/cdd/documents/CEQA-
guidance.html). In this regard, information from previously prepared environmental reports, site visits, and technical research for the Project has been incorporated in this document to describe existing baseline conditions and changes associated with Project implementation within the Area of Potential Effects, at the Project Site and in the surrounding Local Vicinity. Information from conceptual Project plans provided by the applicant have been evaluated and incorporated into this document to identify and fully disclo se proposed changes at the Project Site ( temporary, permanent, and cumulative environmental changes) that can be reasonably expected from all phases of Project implementation.
The P
roject that will be evaluated throughout th is Initial Study is the development of 13.73 gr oss acres of land for Goya at Heritage Park . The Project is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with design guidelines . Plans for the Project indicate 131 single- family detached residences will be constructed within a clustered neighborhood layout that provides shared open space for recreation/neighborhood parks as well access within the Local Vicinity via streets and sidewalks connecting with existing city improvements. Onsite service and utility improvements that will be constructed with the Project include a detention basin, park and community facilities, backbone street and sidewalk access and circulation, and backbone utilit ies with independent service lateral extensions and connections to each residence. Off-site improvements that will be constructed with the Project include right-of-way improvements along adjacent street frontages along the easterly right-of-way boundary of Indian Street and for the full design width of Goya Avenue adjacent to the north of the Project Site. Off-site utilities improvements (upgrades and extensions) to the Project Site are needed and will be constructed with the Project from existing mains and service systems in the Local Vicinity. Community common areas and landscape setbacks, and some aspects of structural exteriors, shown on plans for the Project, will be managed in perpetuity by Project’s Homeowners Association (HOA) according to Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation for the HOA with the intent to provide a desirable, unique, modern, well managed neighborhood that will broaden housing choices for residents within Moreno Valley and bring underutilized land into conformance with the stated goals, policies and objectives of the City’s Housing Element and General Plan.
The City of Moreno Valley is the lead agency responsible for compliance with CEQA and has decision-making authority to approve or deny the proposed Project based on this Initial Study and other Project information in the administrative record. For compliance with CEQA, this Initial Study is intended to fully disclose the type and extent of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts from the Project that can be reasonably expected during construction and over the long-term. This Initial Study proposes mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts to the environment from Project implementation to less than significant levels. This Initial Study has been written to fully comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), (Public Resources Code 21000) , et seq. , State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000), and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 14 City of Moreno Valley
Environmental Concerns
Since the Project Site has been utilized for agriculture historically and is recently subject to consistent discing for weed abatement, most of the surface of the site is essentially disturbed; The Project Site supports no native plant communities and is mostly barren with the exception of a few non- native plant species present around the site boundaries. There are approximately six eucalyptus trees growing within the planned right-of-way for Goya Avenue at the intersection with Indian Street (in the northwest corner of the Project Site). Eucalyptus trees are not a protected species under Moreno Valley’s municipal code; however, these trees have reached a height of 15-feet or greater, therefore, they meet the definition of heritage trees in the City’s Municipal Code. According to Section 9.17.030 (G)(5): Landscape and Irrigation Design standards, removal of a heritage tree is permitted in the future public right-of-way with the approval of the Community Development Department Director. It is the City’s intent to fully develop the circulation system surrounding the Project Site and the tree removals are anticipated with or without the Project. S ignificant unavoidable adverse impacts on sensitive native habitat or cultural resources present at existing ground surface are not expected with the implementation of mitigation measures for the Project . Development of the Project will require removal of large trees providing potential nesting habitat for migratory birds as well as deeper earthwork disturbances establishing stable surfaces for structural foundations and the water quality detention basin. Deeper earthwork has the potential to result in significant impacts to buried archaeological, tribal, and paleontological resources requiring mitigation measures. In addition, tree removals, noise and activity during construction have the potential to disrupt nesting migratory birds at the Project Site and in adjacent areas. The Project Site is within a fee area for Stephen’s kangaroo rat and a survey area for burrowing owl associated with the Western Riverside County MSHCP .
Impacts to biological resources can be reduced to less than significance with mitigation measures .
Technical studies for biological and cultural resources are summarized in this report and have been completed for the Pro ject to document existing conditions and levels of significant Project impacts.
These studies can be found in Appendices B and C in their entirety and recommend mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels.
Ot
her potentially significant environmental impacts from the Project on aesthetics, air quality, public services, land use, utilities and services, hazards and hazardous materials and traffic are evaluated in this document . Future urbanization of the Project Site consistent with full buildout of the City’s approved General Plan and Zoning would result in up to 5 residential dwelling units per acre (DU/AC) at this location, approximately 68 detached single- family homes. The Project proposes to construct detached single-family residences at 9.56 DU/AC and will result in 131 detached single-family homes.
The proposed development will construct adjacent arterial street improvements, which will be dedicated to the City of Moreno Valley for long- term management. The Project will implement common area streets and recreational areas within the proposed neighborhood that will be managed in perpetuity via design guidelines and CC&Rs implemented and funded through an HOA.
To appropriately achieve environmental compliance, the Project footprints and A rea of Potential Effects (APE) have been screened for sensitive environmental resources and plans have been reviewed and designed pursuant to the City of Moreno Valley’s comments from interdepartmental review. Proposed designs shown on plans for the Project utilize Best Management P ractices, standard conditions, and City input to avoid sensitive resources and reduce significant impacts to the greatest extent feasible. Upon the determination of potentially significant environmental impacts that could occur with Project implementation, mitigation measures have been recommended to reduce impacts to a less than significant levels pursuant to findings for a Mitigated Negative under CEQA .
However, if the administrative record for the Project shows mitigation measures are unable to lower impacts to a less than significant level pursuant to CEQA, then an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would need to be prepared for the Project based on the City’s decision.
Project Description
Discretionary Land Use Applications
1. General Plan Amendment (PEN22-0159) to change the General Plan Land Use Designation of the subject 13.73-acre site from Residential 5 to Residential 10;
2. Change of Zone (PEN22-0158) to change the Zoning District Classification of the subject 13.73-acre site from Residential 5 (R5) District to Residential Single-Family 10 (RS10) District;
3. Tentative Tract Map 38458 (PEN22-0156) to subdivide the 13.73-acre site into 131 single-family residential lots, 0.27-acre tot-lot, 0.12-acre dog park, and 0.41-acre retention basin; and
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 15 City of Moreno Valley
4. Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0157) for a Planned Unit Development comprised of 78 detached single-family residences, 0.43-acre tot-lot and dog park, 24,700 square foot retention basin, and on-site and off-site improvements.
Project Site:
The proposed Goya at H eritage Park Project ( Project) i s i n the City of Mor eno V alley, R iverside County California. The Project Site is 13.73 gross acres of undeveloped vacant land and comprised of several parcels: Assessor’s Parcel Number’s (APNs) 316-020-020, -021, -022, -023, -024, and - 025. The Project Site has approximately 594.37 linear feet of street frontage along the south side of planned right- of-way f or G oya Avenue (along the northern Project B oundary) and approximately 946.35
linear f eet of s treet frontage along Indian Street, al ong the westerly pr operty lin e for the Project. The Project Site is approximately 500 feet west of Emma Lane and approximately 1,000 feet from the Indian-Iris Intersection. The Project Site is at the southeast corner of the planned southerly right-of-way for Goya Avenue and Indian Street.
Surrounding Land Use and Development Patterns:
Adjacent parcels to th e south and east are mostly vacant. However, residential developments are present i n t he Local V icinity t o the south, nor th, an d east. D irectly nor th, t here is a mixture of underdeveloped parcels a nd residential d evelopments. U nderdeveloped parcels ar e plan ned for development at higher densities tha n existing conditions, lik e the P roject Site. T o the west of t he Project Site, commercial and light industrial buildings are in use by companies including P&G, Keeco, and Lowe’s. The approved General Pl an Land Use Map for t he City of Moren o Valley (Figure 3 :
General P lan L and Use Map ) shows commercial and industrial l and us e along arterials and residential densities of 5 DU/AC in the Local Vicinity with pockets of detached single-family residential neighborhoods at d ensities of 10 D U/AC interspersed. Ther e is o ne development p lanned at 30 DU/AC in the Local Vicinity north of the Project (north of Iris Avenue). The planned mixed-use corridor for Perris Boulevard, east of the Project Site, is expected to implement higher intensity and residential densities supporting land use and sustainable development objectives of the City’s Gener al Plan.
On-site Project Improvements:
Plans for on-site development show the Project would dedicate approximately 0.06 acres of land to the City of Moreno Valley for Goya Avenue and India n Street public right -of-way. The Project will clear, grad e and construct City -required street and utility improvements along Goy a Avenue (northerly Project Boundary) and the easterly right-of-way boundary for Indian Street (westerly Project boundary) i n conformance w ith City Engineering Standards. T hese improvements i nclude travel lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, signage, streetlights and appropriat e grades for connections wit h the City’s storm drain system. T he Project w ill construct 131 2- story c lustered single- family detached residential homes on 13.67 net ac res, with a proposed residential density of 9.56 dwelling units per a
cre (DU/AC) (See Figure 7: Site Plan, Figure 11: Tentative Tract Map). The proposed residential density is base d on the gross acr eage of 13.73 acres at th e Project Site before public right- of-way dedications. The Project requires a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone from R5 to R10 and from Residential 5 ( R5) District to Residential S ingle-Family ( R10) D istrict respectively t o be compliant with the residential densities establishe d in the City’s Municipal Code. In addition to the General Pl an Amendment and Zone Change, t he Project w ill r equire a Tentative Tract Map for subdivision of land for individual ownershi p and common area lots, Articles of Incorporati on for the Homeowners Association and Conditions Covenants a nd Restrictions, and Conditional Us e Permit for Planned Unit Development and proposed Design Guidelines for the development.
Proposed residential structures are individually separated by interior fenced side yard setbacks, 10- feet-wide. Minimum rear yard setbacks for R5 development are 15 feet , and proposed rear yard setbacks range from 10- 14.6- feet. Proposed residential structures contain minimal front yard setbacks; however, the reduced front yard setbacks are offset by increased shared open space for parks available throughout the Project Site. Project plans indicate that heights of the homes will be maximum 35 feet for two-story building components and 16.5 feet for single-story attached garages.
Site
and floor plans for the Project indicate that three separate floor plans are proposed to provide variety
in size and floor plan layouts (See Figure 10 through 10C: Floor Plans). A 36-f oot-wide backbone circulation road will provide vehicular and pedestrian access from new driveway entrances
from Goya Avenue and Indian Street. The backbone circulation system includes decorative pavement at its connections with Goya Avenue and Indian Street, which will wrap around a section J.1.o
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 16 City of Moreno Valley
of 28 homes and a 0.43-acre (approximately 100-feet by 187-feet) centrally located neighborhood tot lot and dog park within the community. The backbone street provides shared access to each garage.
Between five to eight detached single-family residences will be clustered around shared access drives. Clustered development is proposed along the periphery of the Project Site. On average, clusters contain 8 dwelling units and consist of two 2,140 square- foot. units, two 2,140 square- foot. units, and four 1,874 square-foot. units (See Table 3: Floor Plan Dimensions below).
TABLE 3: FLOOR PLAN DIMENSIONS
Plan No. Lots Unit Type Height Interior Square
Feet (sq. ft.) per
dwelling Unit
Backyard
Setbacks (ft.)
from Back Wall
Plan 1 54 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, 2 Bay
Garage
2-story 1,874 sq. ft. 12 ft.
Plan 2 42 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, 2 Bay
Garage
2-story 2,130 sq. ft. 10 ft.
Plan 3 35 5 Bedroom, 3 Bath, 2 Bay
Garage
2-story 2,140 sq. ft. 14.6 ft.
Source: (Kevin Crook Architect Inc., 2023)
Note: See Figure 9: Elevations
Plans show an additional open space, turf/play area with a perimeter sidewalk and park benches within the northwestern corner of the Project consisting of approximately 0.05 acres (approximately 60-feet by 36.3-feet). Other centrally located open space areas planned for development within the boundaries of the Project, total approximately 0.48 acres, and will be available to the public including a tot lot, fenced small and large dog parks, and turf/ play areas. A retention basin has been proposed in the southwestern corner of the Project Site and is approximately 24,700 square feet and 6- feet deep with a 12-foot-wide access road along the perimeter of the basin.
According to Figure 8: Landscaping Plan, approximately 27 Chinese Pistache “Keith Davey” trees will be planted along the southerly right -of-way boundary of Goya Avenue; approximately 13 Lagerstroemia “Catawba” and 5 Laurus X “Saratoga” trees are proposed along the eastern right-of- way boundary of Indian Street. Both the Lagerstroemia "Catawaba" and Laurus X "Saratoga" trees are flowering; therefore, will enhance both entrances to the Project Site (Goya Avenue and Indian Street). The landscaping proposed for the Project is compliant with Moreno Valley Design Standards and the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).
Project plans indicate exterior elevations with earth- tone finishes and architectural details that vary the architectural styles shown on each of four Project Elevation types (Figure 9: Elevations). There are four proposed building elevations, each displaying different styles. The following types include Spanish, Ranch, Prairie, and Craftsman, which will be implemented pursuant to the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development Architectural Design Guidelines. The Heritage Park PUD Design Guidelines consider the existing character , history, and development of Moreno Valley. Table 4:
Project Elevations summarizes the specific exterior architectural finishes from each elevation style.
TABL
E 4: PROJECT ELEVATIONS
Style Size
(sq. ft.)
Exterior Design Elements
Ranch 1,874
sq. ft.
• Identifying Characteristics:
o Informal, asymmetrical building form
o Low plate lines and low-pitched roof forms
o Siding and/or stone accents
• Massing: Predominant rectangular building form
• Roof:
o Predominant gable and shed roofs.
o 3:12 to 5:12 typical roof pitch; 12” to 16” eave; 8” rake o Flat concrete tiles; flat rustic shingle tiles
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 17 City of Moreno Valley
• Exterior Walls: stucco; Limited use of siding on front elevation encouraged. • Windows: square or rectangular window shapes’ 1” minimum window recesses • Details:
o Wooden headers and sills
o Exposed truss tails or fascia boards
• Colors:
o Primary- Soft to light earthy colors as pale beiges, light khaki and green. o Fascia and trims- contrasting colors in darker brown and weathered gray tones. o Accent- contrasting colors in light or dark tones.
o Roof- Grays and browns.
Spanish 1,874
sq. ft.
• Identifying Characteristics:
o Red “S” tiles roofs
o Arch element, recessed entry, or feature window on the front elevation o Decorative metal railing, gable roof end details
• Massing: Asymmetrical, one and tow-story simple building masses • Roofs:
o Gable or hip roofs; shed roof over porch.
o Typical 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch
o 0” to 12” overhang with tight rakes on gable roof ends o Shallow sloped, concrete “S” tiles in variegated colors (predominantly red) • Exterior Walls: Stucco accent
• Windows and Entries:
o Rectangular or square window shapes
o 1” minimum trim; entry stucco or precast surround
o Recessed entry or feature window on front elevation
• Details:
o Ground-level arch elements on front elevation
o Stucco eave and trim details
o Exposed truss tails with simple decorative cut
o Gable roof end vents with concrete pipe details or recessed faux vents. o Decorative metal railings or grilles
o Attached garage and decorative garage door with wood accents. • Colors:
o Primary- White tones, pale to mid tones of mild yellows and light tans o Fascia and trims- Dark born earth and wood tones
o Accent- Rich tones of blues, reds and washed greens
o Roof- Darker browns and reds
Prairie 2,130
sq. ft.
• Identifying Characteristics:
o Horizontal massing and clean lines
o Low-pitched hip roofs
o Details emphasizing horizontal lines.
• Massing: Strong horizontal building form; one and two-story massing Roofs:
o Low-pitched hips roofs or flat horizontal roofs
o Typical 3:12 to 4: 12 roof pitch
o 12” to 24” overhangs
o Flat concrete tiles
• Exterior Walls: Stucco
• Windows:
o Square or rectangular window shapes
o Horizontal window grouping
• Details:
o Stucco square porch columns
o Contrasting wall materials or trims emphasizing horizontally • Colors:
o Primary- Neutral earthy tones and lighter and whiter tones o Fascia and trims- muted earthy colors such as browns, grays, greens, and wheat tones with pops of rusts, reds, and oranges
o Accent- deep red, green and medium dark wood tones; blues used on occasion. o Roof- dark in value of brown and gray tones
Craftsma
n
2,140
sq. ft.
• Identifying Characteristics:
o Low-pitch gable roofs, occasionally hipped
o Wide projecting eaves with exposed rafter tails, and decorative beams or braces added under the gables.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 18 City of Moreno Valley
o Column bases frequently continue to ground level.
• Massing: simple boxed massing with vertical and horizonal breaks • Roofs:
o Basic side-to-side gable with cross gables
o Typical 3: 12 to 4: 12 roof pitch
o 18” to 30” overhang
o Flat concrete shingle
• Exterior: Stucco
• Windows:
o Vertical multi-paned windows at front elevations
o Windows trim surrounds with headers and sills
o Built-up header trims at front windows
• Details:
o Decorative use of cross beams, braces, and rafter tails o Porches often feature tapered columns and pilasters.
o Brick or stone veneer elements visually anchor the building mass to the ground plane. • Color:
o Primary- Light earth tone
o Accent- Playful or dark accent color
Source: (T&B Planning 2023)
Note: See Appendix I.
Off-site Project Improvements:
Off-site improvements to Goya Avenue and Indian Street will be implemented with the Project.
Improvements along Indian Street, a minor arterial to the ultimate right-of-way width including the installation of a sidewalk, curb, gutter, and curb ramps to align new curb and gutter to the easternly ultimate right-of-way boundary of Indian Street and the existing catch basin located west of the south west corner of the Project Site within the public right-of-way. Streetlights and signage will be installed pursuant to the City’s Engineering Standards; Indian Street improvements include an additional travel lane consisting of a 12-f oot-wide street extension from Goya Avenue to the Project Site’s southwestern corner along the easterly perimeter; repaving Indian Street half-width from Goya to the Project Site’s southwestern corner; and incorporating a, ADA compliant sidewalk along the perimeter of the eastbound lane of Goya Stre et right -of-way to the southern property boundary; and the construction of a 1,400 linear foot sewer main which will extend within the Indian Street and Krameria Avenue right-of-way from the westerly terminus of Goya Avenue to the Krameria Avenue and Orion Way intersection (See Figure 14: Proposed and Existing Utility Lines). The proposed sewer main will connect to an existing 8” PVC sewer line which runs east -west along Krameria Avenue, serving adjacent residential development.
Improvements along Goya Street, a collector street , will include installing pavement along the full ultimate right-of-way width along Goya Street between Smoke Tree Place and Indian Street; this will require tree removals, clearing, grubbing grading within the street right -of-way of Goya Avenue.
Proposed improvements in Goya Avenue include installation of curbs, gutters, curb ramps, sidewalks, installation of utilities and connections (e.g., storm water, sewer, water , gas, electric, telecommunications). MARB Monitoring wells within Goya Avenue will be adjusted by MARB to the elevation of the finished street. As a result of the proposed off-site improvements along Goya Avenue, Goya Avenue will become a complete through street.
Project Construction
Project construction is anticipated to start approximately 24-30 months during the fourth quarter of 2023 and will take 2.5 years to complete. During Project construction, equipment that will be utilized includes a diesel -fueled pile driver , clam shovel drop, vibratory roller, large bulldozer, caisson drill, loaded trucks, jackhammer, and small bulldozer.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 19 City of Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley Cumulative Projects
CEQA Guidelines §15355 a) defines “Cumulative Impacts” as two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or compound or increase other environmental impacts. CEQA Guidelines §15355 b ) states “The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects.
Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time”.
The City of Moreno, as the Lead Agency for CEQA, has identified 16 development projects within City Limits, including the proposed Project, which should be analyzed together for cumulative impacts. (See Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map for project locations). The development projects vary in land use, ranging from low to medium density residential, commercial, industrial, and retail. See Table 5: Moreno Valley Cumulative Projects List below.
TABLE 5: MORENO VALLEY CUMULATIVE PROJECTS LIST
No. Project ID Project Name Project Location (cross
streets + Lat/Long)
APNs Approved Land Use/ Density
and Proposed Land Use/
Density
Quantity
ITE
Code
Date Constructed or
Operational
1 PEN21-0216 TTM38064- Perris at
Pentecostal
Emma Lane & Iris Avenue
(Lat33.8883 N/Long -
117.2306W)
485220006 Approved: Residential (R-30)
Proposed: Residential (R-30)
426 DU 220 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
2*
PEN22-0037 Goya & Indian- Goya at
Heritage Park (Proposed
Project)
Goya Avenue & Indian Street
(Lat 33.884021°N/Long -
117.233334°W)
316020020,
-021, -022,
-023, -024,
-025
Approved: Residential (R5)
Proposed: Residential (RS10)
131 DU 210 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
3 PEN22-0156 TTM38458- South of Iris Iris Avenue
(Lat 33.886492°N/ Long -
117.233281°W)
316030019 Approved: Residential (R5)
Proposed: Residential (RS10)
78 DU 210 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
4 PEN21-0228 Walmart Perris Boulevard & Gentian
Avenue
(Lat 33.894011°N / Long -
117.226686°W)
485220041 Approved: Corridor Mixed Use
Proposed: Retail
189.52 TSF
16 VFP
813
946
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
5 PEN21-0208 Perris & Iris Perris & Iris
(Lat 33.887964°N / Long -
117.227093°W)
316030014 Approved: Corridor Mixed Use
Proposed: Retail/Commercial
22 KSF
2.8 KSF
1 KSF
1 Tunnel
850
934
937
948
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
6 PEN23-0010 Heacock Commerce
Center
Heacock Street & Gentian
Avenue
(Lat 33.893565°N / Long -
177.241259°W)
485230027 Approved: Residential (R5)
Proposed: Industrial
883.25 TSF 150 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
7 PEN21-0022 Heacock Street
Warehouse
Heacock Street & Krameria
Avenue
(Lat 33.883024°N / Long -
117.243191°W)
316020052
Approved: Business Park/ Light
Industrial
Proposed: Industrial
99.486 TSF 150 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
8 N/A; Under
MJPA
jurisdiction
Meridian D-1 Gateway
Aviation
March Air Reserve Base,
Eastern Perimeter
(Lat 33.873975°N/ Long -
117.2444913°W)
294170010 Approved: NA
Proposed: Air Freight Cargo
Center
180.8 KSF cargo building
with 9 at [1] grade (ground
level) loading doors, 31
dock-high door positions,
N/A; Use
262 AM
PH trips.
144 PM
PH trips
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Goya at Heritage Park Page 20 City of Moreno Valley
No. Project ID Project Name Project Location (cross
streets + Lat/Long)
APNs Approved Land Use/ Density
and Proposed Land Use/
Density
Quantity
ITE
Code
Date Constructed or
Operational
and 37 trailer storage
positions
1880
daily trips
9 PEN21-0102 Heacock Logistics
Parking Lot
East side of Heacock Street & E
Oleander Street, north of Perris
Valley Storm Drain
(Lat 33.860122°N / Long -
117.241619°W)
316211014 Approved: Parks/ Open Space
Proposed: Parking Lot
220 semi-truck parking lot N/A; Use
33 AM
PH trips.
37 PM
PH trips
484 daily
trips
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
10 PEN20-0063 TTM37909 Saddlebrook Lane & Iris Avenue
(Lat 33.887607°N / Long -
117.223376°W)
312020030 Approved: Residential (R5)
Proposed: Residential (RS10)
82 DUs 210 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
11 PEN21-0206 TTM37725 Tarano Lan & Krameria Avenue
(Lat 33.881065°N / Long -
117.228322°W)
316110023 Approved: Residential (R5)
Proposed: Residential (R5)
64 DUs 210 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
12 PEN19-0203 TTM33607 Perris Boulevard
(Lat 33.907728°N / Long -
117.226112°W)
484231016 Approved: Corridor Mixed Use
Proposed: Residential
52 DUs 220 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
13 PEN21-0151 Rivard Industrial 24830 Rivard Road
(Lat 33.872925°N / Long -
117.229542°W)
316190024 Approved: Business Park/Light
Industrial
Proposed: Industrial
21.7 TSF 150 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
14 PEN22-0260 MV Business Center 5 1711 Perris Boulevard, Moreno Valley, CA 92551
(Lat 33.872398859°N / Long -
117.226728694°W)
316190009 Approved: Business Park/ Light
Industrial
Proposed: Industrial
39.665 TSF 150 Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
15 PEN21-0213 Rivard Truck Storage
and Office
San Celeste Street & Rivard
Street
(Lat 33.872528°N / Long -
117.229255°W)
316190012 Approved: Business Park/ Light
Industrial
Proposed: Industrial
87 space truck storage
yards
3.034 TSF office
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
16 PEN18-0107 Continental Villages Krameria Avenue & Lasselle Street
(Lat 33.882193°N / Long -
117.206945°W)
308040058 Approved: Residential (R20)/
Commercial
Proposed: Residential (R20)/
Commercial
112 DUs
21 TSF
220
820
Anticipated to be
completed by Project’s
opening year.
Source: City of Moreno Valley, 2023
Note: *Proposed Project
As shown in Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map , several of the City’s development projects are within a mile of the Project Site; therefore, Moreno Valley’s cumulative projects were considered during the evaluation of Project -related environmental impacts and influenced calculations for noise, traffic, and air quality/ greenhouse gas emissions. See Appendices A, H, and G.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Goya at Heritage Park Page 21 City of Moreno Valley
14. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
State law and County of Riverside Guidelines identify Native American consultation and participation as an important aspect of cultural resources evaluation. To identify potential Native American resources, a Sacred Land File Search was conducted at the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). A current Sacred Lands File Search response from the NAHC was received on September 28, 2022 (See Appendix C ). The results of the Sacred Lands File Search were negative in that no resources have been previously identified in the immediate area of the Project Site.
While the SLF came back negative, it was recommended by the California NAHC that other cultural resources also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. The City of Moreno Valley initiated and carr ied out the required Native American Consul tation on August 18, 2023 .
Outreach from the City involved scoping letters sent to Native American tribes from a list NAHC provided. These tribes are believed to also have knowledge of cultural resources in the Project Area since their presence is r elatively close to the Project. Tribes that were contacted include Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Augustine Band of Cahullia Mission Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Cahuilla Band of Indians, Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Morongo Band of Missions Indians, Pala Band of Missions Indians, Pechanga Band of Mission Indians, Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, Ramona Band of Cahuilla, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and Torres- Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians.
Tribes that decided to pursue formal Tribal Consultation under AB 52 and/or SB18 included Agua Caliente Band of Cahullia Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Desert Cahullia Indians, Pechanga Cultural Resources Department, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation. On Augst 25th, 2023, the City of Moreno Valley received a letter from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ABCI), indicating the Project Location is within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation; therefore, ACBCI requested formal government consultation under AB -52 and SB -18. Copies of the cultural resource documentation, records searches with associated survey reports from the SLF information center, and cultural resources inventory of the Project Area by a qualified archeologist was sent to the tribe.
On August 30, 2023, ACBCI commented on associated cultural resources documentation for the Project and requested the presence of an archeologist at the Project Site pursuant to the Secretary of Interior’s standards during ground disturbing activities pursuant to Mitigation Measure MM CUL- 01: Archeological Monitoring; presence of an approved Cultural Resources Monitor during ground disturbing activities pursuant to Mitigation Measure MM CUL-02 Native American Monitoring and MM CUL-03: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP); and provide a copy of the MND once available. The letter indicated the conclusion of AB-52 consultation, since the concerns of ACBCI had been addressed through Mitigation Measures procured during consultation activities.
On August 31, 2023, the City of Moreno Valley received a response from Sarah Heysel, a representative for the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (formally known as the San Manual Band of Mission Indians). The YSMNs confirmed the receipt of project documentation; however, indicated the tribe will not be requesting further consultation or participation in the scoping, development, or review period, since the Project Location is outside of Serrano ancestral territory. On September 8, 2023, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians indicated the Project Site was within the Traditional Use Area (TUA) of the Luiseno people. The requested copies of existing documents pertaining to the project J.1.o
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goya at Heritage Park Page 22 City of Moreno Valley
including site records, shapefiles, archeological resource search results, geotechnical report, and grading plans. The City of Moreno Valley sent the tribe the requested documents. On November 18, 2023, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians wrote a letter to the City of Moreno Valley indicating the Project Area fell within the Tradition Use Areas of the Tribe and is considered to be culturally sensitive. As a result, the tribe requested SB18 consultation and cultural resources monitoring pursuant to MM CUL-02 and MM CUL-03.
Tribal consultation has resulted in the application of a total of nine mitigation measures MM CUL -01 through MM CUL- 09 to the Project. City staff indicates formal tribal consultation under AB52 and SB18 are complete. Any further input from the tribes will be through the 30-day public review period for CEQA.
15. Other public agencies approval (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):
• Utilities Service Agreement
• Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD) • Regional Water Quality Control Board Certification, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) • Water Quality Certification
• Moreno Valley Community Development Department Director- Heritage Tree Removal • Encroachment Permit
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 7. Site Plan
Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc.
Not to Scale
I !
i i
j i
I
I I
I
i
I
I
!
i
1---------
__ L_
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 8. Landscape PlanNot to Scale
Source: Wood Architecture
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Figure 9: Front Elevations
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Not to Scale
Source: Kevin Crook Architect Inc.
Note: Maximum structure height 35 ft
Note: Plan 1 Note: Plan 1
Note: Plan 2 Note: Plan 3
¯
CRAFTSMAN
SPANISH RANCH
PRAIRIE
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Figure 10: Cluster Plan
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Not to Scale
Source: Kevin Crook Architect Inc.
Note: Maximum structure height 35 ft
SECOND FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLANS
SECOND FLOOR PLANS
SECOND FLOOR PLANS
SECOND FLOOR PLANS
PLAN 1
PLAN 1
PLAN 1
PLAN 1 PLAN 1
PLAN 1
PLAN 3 PLAN 3PLAN 2PLAN 2
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Figure 10A: Plan 1 Floor Plan
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Source: Kevin Crook Architect Inc.
Not to Scale
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Legend
Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet
Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Figure 10B: Plan 2 Floor Plan
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Not to Scale
Source: Kevin Crook Architect Inc. Legend
Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] Figure 10C: Plan 3 Floor Plan
City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Source: Kevin Crook Architect Inc.
Not to Scale
Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet
Legend
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Note: Maximum structure height 35-feet
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK City of Moreno Valley
South of Goya
Figure 11. Tenative Tract Map
Not to Scale
¯
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
Goya at Heritage Park Page 31 City of Moreno Valley
16. Other Technical Studies Referenced in this Initial Study (Provided as Appendices):
a. Appendix A - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study/Energy Report (Ganddini 2023) b. Appendix B- Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis (ELMT Consulting 2023)
c. Appendix C - Cultural/Archaeological/Tribal/Paleontology (BCR Consulting 2023) d. Appendix D - Soils and Geotechnical (Krazen & Associates 2023) e. Appendix E - Preliminary Project Specific Water Quality Management and Preliminary Drainage Report (Greenberg Farrow 2023)
f. Appendix F - Preliminary Drainage and Hydrology Report (Greenberg Farrow 2023) g. Appendix G - Transportation Study Screening Assessment & VMT Impact Analysis; Traffic Impact Analysis; Trip Forecasts for Goya Avenue (Ganddini 2023) h. Appendix H - Noise Study (Ganddini 2023)
i. Appendix I - Planned Unit Development Guidelines: Heritage Park (T&B Planning 2023)
17. Acronyms:
ADA - American with Disabilities Act
ALUC - Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP - Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
AQMP
APE -
Air Quality Management Plan
Area of Potential Effects
CEQA - California Environmental Quality Act
CIWMD - California Integrated Waste Management District CMP –
CUPA-
CUP -
Congestion Management Plan
California Unified Program Agency
Conditional Use Permit
DTSC - Department of Toxic Substance Control
DWR - Department of Water Resources
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
EMWD - Eastern Municipal Water District
EOP - Emergency Operations Plan
FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency
FMMP - Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
GIS - Geographic Information System
GHG - Greenhouse Gas
GP –
GPA -
General Plan
General Plan Amendment
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HOA - Homeowners’ Association
IS - Initial Study
LHMP - Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LOS - Level of Service
LST - Localized Significance Threshold
MARB - March Air Reserve Base
MARB/IPA- March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport
MSHCP - Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
MVFP - Moreno Valley Fire Department
MVPD - Moreno Valley Police Department
MVUSD - Moreno Valley Unified School District
MWD - Metropolitan Water District
NCCP - Natural Communities Conservation Plan
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System J.1.o
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 32 City of Moreno Valley
OEM - Office of Emergency Services
OPR - Office of Planning & Research, State
PEIR - Program Environmental Impact Report
PW - Public Works
RCEH - Riverside County Environmental Health
RCFCWCD - Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District RCP - Regional Comprehensive Plan
RCTC - Riverside County Transportation Commission
RCWMD –
ROW-
Riverside County Waste Management District
Right-of-way
RTA - Riverside Transit Agency
RTIP - Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP - Regional Transportation Plan
SAWPA - Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
SCAG - Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE - Southern California Edison
SCH - State Clearinghouse
SKRHCP - Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan SWPPP - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB –
TTM-
State Water Resources Control Board
Tentative Tract Map
USFWS - United States Fish and Wildlife
USGS - United States Geologic Survey
VMT - Vehicle Miles Traveled
VVUSD - Valley Verde Unified School District
WQMP - Water Quality Management Plan
WRCOG - Western Riverside Council of Government
18. Definitions:
Part 1- Project Terminology
Backbone Circulation System: Internal vehicular circulation system that connects to existing and planned street right-of-way. Reference Section XI- Transportation for more detail.
Diverse Use: a distinct business or organization that provides goods or services intended to meet daily needs and is publicly available. Automated facilities such as ATMs or vending machines are not included (USGBC)
Project Site: defined by the land within Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: (APNs) 316-020-020, -021, - 022, -023, -024, and -025.
Part 2- Environmental Evaluation Checklist Terminology
The Initial Study is based on the Environmental Checklist Form within Section 15063 (d) (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines (CEQA 2022). The responses to questions about the proposed Project, found in Section 3.1, indicate less than significant environmental impacts with mitigation are anticipated from Project implementation. The Form in Section 2 is used to evaluate impacts and includes an explanation for each answer within Section 3.0. The following terminology is used to describe the level of significance of Project-related impacts.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 33 City of Moreno Valley
Area of Potential Effects: The footprint of development (both horizontal and vertical) where direct impacts from the Project will occur and the Local Vicinity where indirect impacts from a project could occur.
Best Management Practices: a technique, measure, or structural control that is used for a given set of conditions to manage the quantity and improve the quality of stormwater runoff in a cost- effective manner.
Conditions of Approval : Requirements placed on discretionary projects (use permits, development plans, etc.), which detail the requirements for implementing the approved project; must be consistent with federal, state, and local laws.
Impact: A physical change in the environment on a sensitive or regulated resource.
Less Than Significant Impact: Level of changes in the environment from a project when there is potential for an impact based on the location of resources or the location or nature of the project; however, the extent of the change is not expected to be substantial or perceptible, exceeding thresholds of significance identified in the Appendix G Checklist and other trustee or responsible agency standards due to avoidance measures and regulations, applied to the project to reduce the levels of significance of impacts.
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation: The level of changes in the environment with the implementation of a project exceeds thresholds of significance, however there are conditions or measures that can be applied to the project as mitigation measures which can measurably reduce impacts to below thresholds of significance of Appendix G and other trustee or responsible agency standards.
Local Vicinity: The area and parcels surrounding a Project Site where direct or indirect impacts from Project implementation may occur.
Mitigation: Feasible measures that could be applied to project design and construction to minimize significant adverse impacts, which are tailored to specific circumstances of a particular project and place. Mitigation places requirements on a project beyond standard applicable ordinances and is intended to tailor a project and project activities to a particular location.
No Impact: Level of changes in the environment from a project when there are either no related resources that could be affected by a project or there are no project -related changes that could result in a change in the environment.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts: The level of substantive changes that will result from project implementation resulting in significant changes to the environment, and expected with a project, after avoidance and mitigation measures have been applied, exceeding thresholds of significance.
Project: An activity undertaken by an agency or private entity which requires discretionary approval leading and will either have a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment.
Threshold of Significance: A guideline or standard established for public health, safety, welfare, protection of natural resources or stewardship of the environment.
Significant: Substantial or potentially substantial adverse change to any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. .,,, . Aesthetics D Agriculture & • ... � Air Quality Forestry Resources • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources D Energy
• Geology & Soils • Greenhouse Gas • Hazards & Hazardous Emissions Materials
• Hydrology & • Land Use & Planning D Mineral Resources Water Quality • Noise • Population & Housing • Public Services
D Recreation • Transportation • Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities & • Wildfire • Mandatory Findings of
Service Systems Significance
3.0 DETER MINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation:
D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there a will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an D earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potenti significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE D DECLA Tl N pu uant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that e pro.1bsed project, nothing further is required.
Oec. 27,l..OZ?J I
Date
City of Moreno Valley
For
Goya at Heritage Park Page 34 City of Moreno Valley
..
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND RE PORTING PR OG RAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 2023
Goy
a at Heritage Park Page 35 City of Moreno Valley
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK AT GOYA
PEN23-0069 (TTM), PEN23-0070 (PUD), PEN23-0071 (Change of Zone), and PEN23-0072 (General Plan Amendment) The following is a Mi�ga�on Monitoring and Repor�ng Program (MMRP) for the Goya at Heritage Park located in Moreno Valley, California. This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Sec�on 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines and Sec�on 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. This MMRP lists all applicable Project Mi�ga�on Measures (MM), Standard Condi�on (SC), and
environmental commitments for execu�ng Best Management Prac�ces provided by the Project Applicant that are required to be implemented with the Project under exis�ng Plans, Programs, and Policies for environmental resource protec�on. This MMRP includes implementa�on �ming and responsible party to ensure proper enforcement of all MMs and SCs to reduce Project impacts. The City o f Moreno Valley, as the Lead Agency, will u�lize the MMRP to document the implementa�on of Project mi�ga�on and BMP environmental commitments, which ensure all project impacts are reduced to less than significance pursuant to The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs a) Have a substan�al adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
c) In non -urbanized areas,
substan�ally degrade the exis�ng
visual character or quality of public
v i e w s o f t h e s i t e a n d i t s
surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regula�ons governing scenic quality?
MM AES-01- Perimeter Walls: Prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits , the City of Moreno Valley shall verify that Project plans and the recorded CC&Rs for the Project include the following types of perimeter fencing and walls to be installed during construc�on and maintained in perpetuity throughout the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development:
1. Perimeter Block Walls - Perimeter block walls generally located around the exterior of the neighborhood to
provide homes with privacy and noise atenua�on from
abu�ng roads and off -site land uses. These Perimeter
Block Walls consist of textured split-face concrete solid bricks, with no openings. The wall shall measure six (6) feet in height as measured from ground surface
including two (2) inch high caps. The wall shall include 16-inch block decora�ve concrete block pilasters with
no openings, at each lot line and change of fence type.
2. Interior Vinyl Fence: Interior Vinyl Fences are generally located between side yards and at the back of
residen�al lots (excluding lots which rear on public
streets, which are covered in item 1. above) to provide privacy and security for residents. Interior Vinyl Fences have a height of six (6) feet as measured above ground
surface and are constructed of tongue and groove
panels, top and botom rails, and vinyl posts with vinyl caps.
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits.
City’s Building Official,
Planning Division, and
the City Engineer.
Ini�als: _________
Dat
e: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 36 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
3. Tubular Steel Fence: Tubular Steel Fences are generally located at the perimeters of reten�on basin areas and
dog parks. These Tubular Steel Fences preserve scenic
views while maintaining security for residents and
visitors of the community. View fences have a maximum
height of six (6) feet and are constructed of tubular steel
0.5-inch square 16 -gauge palings and 1.5 -inch square
14-gauge tubing top and botom rails. The color finish of the tubular steel fence should complement the
community design theme.
The City’s Building Official, Planning Division, and the City Engineer shall verify construc�on plans show perimeter fencing and concrete block walls, according to items a through c above, within the Heritage Park Plan ned Unit Development and that perimeter walls and fences will be constructed from materials, colors, and textures that are similar and harmonious with the architecture and earth tones, as indicated on Project Plans, Design Guidelines, and in Figures 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Eleva�ons of the Dra� ISMND.
Long-term maintenance of items a) through 3) above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning D ivision prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
City review of Site Plans, Design Guidelines, CC&Rs and Ar�cles of Incorpora�on for the HOA shall verify that the CC&Rs provide guidelines for perpetual maintenance of all community perimeter fencing and walls for the Project shown on
Figure 7: Site Plan of
the ISMND. This verifica�on will be done by the City Engineer, Building Official, and/or Planning Division prior to issuance of final approval of the Tract Map and prior to issuance of building and grading permits for the Project and verified again w ithin the recorded CC&Rs prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy. Implementa�on will be verified during Project inspec�ons by the City Building Inspector. Inclusion of the fencing plan and maintenance program shall be included in the r ecorded J.1.o
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 37 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
CC&Rs by the City Inspector, City Engineer, and Building Official prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy.
MM AES-02- Landscaping and Irriga�on: The City Building Official, Planning Division, and the City Engineer shall verify prior to Final Tract Map approval and prior to issuance of permits, that Project plans show landscaping and irriga�on along Iris Avenue and Goya Avenue providing effec�ve screening and visual buffers between the adjacent public streets and the Project; this includes permanent maintenance through the CC&Rs and HOA. T he
second stor ies of the proposed residen�al structures that are visible from Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall be buffered .
Pursuant to the Heritage Park PUD Design Guidelines, landscaping along Goya Avenue and Indian Street should consist of the following:
Goya Avenue
Goya Avenue shall contain curb separated landscaped parkways maintained by the HOA and adorned with 27 Chinese Pistache trees (or a suitable alterna�ve tree species with similar foliage and mature heights reaching 25- to 35-feet tall and canopies of up to 50-feet wide) that provide a visual buffer between the street and adjacent residen�al areas. At the Goya Street vehicular entry, a curb-separated walkway lined with four (4) Koelreuteria Bipinnata trees shall be implemented or If an alterna�ve species is selected for implementa�on it shall provide similar foliage and reach mature heights up to 40- to 60-feet tall with a canopy of up to 30- feet to 40-feet wide.
Indian Street
Indian Street shall feature landscaped parkways, maintained by the HOA, ac�ng as a buffer between the street and surrounding residen�al areas. Two (2) Crape Myrtle trees (or suitable alterna�ve species reaching 15 -feet to 25-feet-tall with a canopy of 6 -feet to 15 -feet wide) and thirteen (13) Lagerstroemia “Catawba” shall adorn the parkways, while five (5) Saratoga Sweet Bay trees (or suitable alterna�ve with similar foliage and up to 15- Prior to Final
Tract Map
approval and
prior to issuance
of permits. Prior
to issuance of the
first cer�ficate of
occupancy
City Building Official,
Planning Division, and
the City Engineer.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 38 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
\
feet to 35-feet tall and 15 -feet to 35 -feet wide at maturity) will create a barrier between the street and the reten�on basin area to the east. At the Indian Street vehicular entry, planted trees at the curb-separated walkway will consist of four (4) Koelreuteria Bipinnata trees (or a suitable alterna�ve with similar foliage with heights up to 40 - to 60-feet tall and a canopy of up to 30 -feet to 40-feet wide at maturity.
Prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy, the City Planning Division, Inspector and Building Official shall verify that landscape irriga�on and maintenance is included in the recorded CC&Rs for the Project.
MM AES-03- Exterior Finishes: The City’s Building Official and/or Planning Division shall verify prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, that plans will show the following architectural details on the front and rear facades (exteriors of residen�al structures) facing Goya Avenue and Indian Street and from public open space. Plan check shall include verifica�on by the City Engineer, Building Official and Planning Division that CC&Rs for the Project include guidelines for long term
maintenance of these features on these specific lots as described below and shown in Figure 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Eleva�on Plans in the Dra� ISMND and the Design Guidelines for the Project:
A. Building Form, Massing, and Ar�cula�on
1. Front and rear building setbacks along Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall be varied
2. Eleva�on Plans shown in Figure 9: Eleva�ons of the Dra� ISMND provide four architectural styles (Spanish, Ranch, Prairie, and Cra�sman) . Architectural building styles shall alternate along the streets.
3. Street entry driveways from Goya Avenue and Indian
Street shall include decora�ve pavement and large
container trees and plants.
4. Plans shall show plane offsets for façade ar�cula�on and varied roof forms.
Prior to final tract
map approval and
issuance of
permits.
City Engineer, City
Building Official and
Planning Division
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 39 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
5. Plans shall show matching structure details, such as window trim and exterior doors, according to the
architectural style of the structure.
6. Decora�ve a rchitectural details will be added on
building facades that are visible from adjacent streets and parks. These treatments could include varied and
complimentary colors to accentuate building features,
brackets or trellises for roof overhangs and projec�ons, stonework, window shuters and decora�ve trim among
others. These details should be applied to enhance the
eleva�ons of buildings and create a dynamic and
aesthe�c in public areas.
B. Windows:
1. Coordinate each eleva�on’s window shape, size, and
loca�on to provide a logical, propor�onal, and atrac�ve composi�on consistent with the architectural style.
2. Arrange and determine the dimensions of windows in
accordance with the condi�ons of the site, taking into
account privacy concerns to the extent possible.
3. Feature windows are encouraged to incorporate
enhancements such as recess into the wall plane,
enhanced sills with corresponding roof elements,
shuters, projec�ng overhead trellis elements, or
decora�ve grilles if appropriate to the architectural
style. All other windows on the front eleva�on feature
trim surrounds, headers and/or sills, or other
enhancements consistent with the architectural style of the building.
4. When used, the shape and size of shuters should be
propor�onate to the window opening and appear as
func�oning elements.
C. Colors and Materials:
1. Building materials and colors shown on architectural plans are in earthtones. Final color selec�on should be J.1.o
Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 40 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
appropriate to the overall neighborhood design theme
and relate to the selected architectural style.
2. Where color or material changes occur on the building, such changes should only occur at inside corners or
wrapped to termina�on points of at least 24 inches that provide a finished appearance from the street.
3. Columns and posts should be enveloped by the color
and materials, which should come to an end at the point where the material changes.
4. Apply colors and materials to enhance changes in wall plane, reinforce ar�cula�on of eleva�ons, and enhance
special features such as entries, single -story elements, etc.
5. Select high -quality, low -maintenance, and durable
materials to minimize the need for a replacement that
would contribute to landfill waste.
6. Appropriate building materials include, but are not
limited to:
- Stucco
- Simulated wood siding
- Natural or manufactured stone veneer
- Natural or manufactured brick veneer
- Metal
- Vinyl Windows
D. Roofs
1. Select roof forms, pitches and materials that are
consistent with the architectural style of the building.
Consider roof forms in rela�on to the building mass to
improve massing relief along public streets and on other publicly visible eleva�ons.
2. Varied roof forms, offsets and materials consistent with the architectural style of the building are encouraged to create varia�on in the street level views.
3. Keep roof forms simple and efficient based on the
architectural style and plan shape. Avoid overly
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 41 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
complicated roof design that detracts from the
characteris�cs of the architectural style.
4. Consider the visual impact of the placement of
photovoltaic panels and/or �les, as well as any solar
water hea�ng panels, while designing roof plans.
Minimize or group roo�op equipment to leave
adequate, con�nuous space for roo�op photovoltaic
systems where feasible.
E. Guters and Downspouts:
1. Where it is feasible, though�ul considera�on should be given as to the loca�on of the overall gutering system
during the architectural design process so that the result is a cohesive building façade in which all elements,
including guters and downspou ts, work together to
create a pleasing building façade.
2. Whenever possible, downspouts should be located in
the least conspicuous loca�on, such as side and rear
facades of the building.
3. Exposed guters and downspouts may be painted to
complement or match the colors of the surfaces to
which they are atached.
4. Guter and downspout loca�ons shall be subject to
CC&R guidelines and HOA approval.
Exterior finishes described above shall be constructed with the Project, enforced by the HOA according to recorded CC&Rs as shown on project plans, as verified by the City of Moreno Valley, prior to issuance of final tract map approval and issuance of permits. Incorpora�on of items a) through e above shall be incorporated in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Planning Division, Building Official and Inspector prior to issuance of the first cer�ficate of occupancy to enhance street-level views from streets and public open spaces
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 42 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Aesthe�cs
a), c) con�nued…
SC AES-01: Visual Impacts - Prior to issuance of permits and final tract map approval, the City Engineer and Planning D ivision shall verify that Project plans and CC&Rs for the Project incorporate guidelines/regula�ons for the following:
a) Enforce the Municipal Code requirements and Design
Guidelines to ensure that high quality development
yielding a pleasant living environment for exis�ng and
future residents ( GP Objec�ve 2-10)
b) New electrical and communica�on lines are to be placed underground (GP Policy 7.7.1)
c) The size, number and design on signs shall be subject to city review and approval to minimize degrada�on of
visual quality (GP Policy 7.7.2)
d) Minimize the visibility of wireless communica�on
facili�es by the public. Encourage “stealth” designs and encourage new antennas to be located on exis�ng
poles, buildings and other structures . Antennas are to be mounted in a manner not exceeding the heights of
these structures. (GP Policy 7.7.5)
During Plan Check
and Inspec�ons
and ongoing
City Engineer,
Planning Division, and
Developer/ Builder/
Contractor. HOA
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Air Quality
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementa�on of the applicable air
quality plan?
SC AQ-01: Compliance with SCAQMD Rules - Throughout Project construc�on, the Project contractor shall adhere to the following rules outlined within SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan:
SCAQMD Rule 402: Prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quan��es of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort , repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
SCAQMD Rule 403: Governs emissions of fugi�ve dust during construc�on and opera�on ac�vi�es. Compliance with this rule is achieved through applica�on of standard Best Management Prac�ces (BMPs), such as applica�on of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restric�ng vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 43 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a) con�nued…
loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessa�on of construc�on ac�vity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.
Rule 403 requires that fugi�ve dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addi�on, SCAQMD Rule 403 requires
implementa�on of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugi�ve dust from crea�ng a nuisance off -site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below and can reduce fugi�ve dust genera�on, Par�culate Mater 10 microns or greater in diameter (PM10). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensi�ve receptors. Rule 403 measures may include but are not limited to the following:
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according
to manufacturers’ specifica�ons to all inac�ve
construc�on areas (previously graded areas
inac�ve for 10 days or more).
• Water ac�ve sites at least three �mes daily.
(Loca�ons where grading is to occur will be
thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving.)
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other
loose materials, or maintain at least 0.6 meters (2
feet) of freeboard (ver�cal space between the top
of the load and top of the trailer) in accordance
with the requirements of California Vehicle Code
sec�on 23114.
• Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15
miles per hour (mph) or less.
• Suspension of all grading ac�vi�es when wind
speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts)
exceed 25 mph.
• Bumper strips or similar BMPs shall be provided
where vehicles enter and exit the construc�on site
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 44 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a) con�nued…
onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any
equipment leaving the site each trip.
• Replan�ng disturbed areas as soon as prac�cal.
• During all construc�on ac�vi�es, construc�on
contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site streets
if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of par�culate mater on public
streets. All sweepers shall be compliant with
SCAQMD Rule 1186.1, Less Pollu�ng Sweepers.
SCAQMD Rule 445: Prohibits permanently installed wood burning devices into any new development. A wood burning device means any fireplace, wood burning heater, or pellet-fueled wood heater, or any similarly enclosed, permanently installed, indoor or outdoor device burning any solid fuel for aesthe�c or space- hea�ng purposes, which has a heat input of less than one million Bri�sh thermal units per hour.
SCAQMD Rule 481: Applies to all spray pain�ng and spray coa�ng opera�ons and equipment, requiring that a person shall not use or operate any spray pain�ng or spray coa�ng equipment unless one of the following condi�ons is met:
(1) The spray coa�ng equipment is operated inside a control enclosure, which is approved by the Execu�ve Officer. Any control enclosure for which an applica�on for permit for new
construc�on, altera�on, or change of ownership or loca�on is submited a�er the date of adop�on of this rule shall be exhausted only through filters at a design face velocity not less than 100 feet per minute nor greater than 300 feet per minute, or through a water wash system designed to be equally effec�ve for the purpose of air pollu�on control.
(2) Coa�ngs are applied with high -volume low -pressure, electrosta�c and/or airless spray equipment.
(3) An alterna�ve method of coa�ng applica�on or control is used which has effec�veness equal to or greater than the equipment specified in the rule.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 45 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a) con�nued…
SCAQMD Rule 1108: Governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the vola�le organic compound (VOC) content in asphalt used in the Basin and regulates the VOC content of asphalt during construc�on. All asphalt used during Project construc�on must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1108.
SCAQMD Rule 1113: Governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coa�ng and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. Regulates VOC content of paints during
construc�on. All paints and solvents used during Project construc�on and opera�on must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113.
SCAQMD Rule 1143: Governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coa�ng materials, cleaning of coa�ng applica�on equipment, and other solvent cleaning opera�ons by limi�ng their VOC content. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construc�on.
Solvents used during the construc�on phase must comply with this rule.
SCAQMD Rule 1186: Limits the presence of fugi�ve dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets cer�fica�on protocols and
requirements for contract street sweepers to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanita�on, transit, or school district.
SCAQMD Rule 1303: Governs the permi�ng of re-located or new major emission sources, requiring Best Available Control Measures and se�ng significance limits for PM10 among other pollutants.
SCAQMD Rule 1401: New Source Review of Toxic Air
Contaminants, specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risk, cancer burden, and non -cancer acute and chronic hazard index from new permit units, reloca�ons, or modifica�ons to exis�ng permit units, which emit toxic air contaminants.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 46 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality
a) con�nued…
SCAQMD Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from
Demoli�on/Renova�on Ac�vi�es, specifies work prac�ce
requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demoli�on and renova�on ac�vi�es, including the removal and associated disturbance of asbestos-containing materials (ACM).
SCAQMD Rule 2202: On-Road Motor Vehicle Mi�ga�on Op�ons, is to provide employers with a menu of op�ons to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes, to comply with federal and state Clean Air Act requirements, Health & Safety Code Sec�on 40458, and Sec�on 182(d)(1)(B) of the federal Clean A i r A c t . I t a p p l i e s t o a n y e m p l o y e r w h o e m p l o y s 2 5 0 o r m o r e employees on a full or part -�me basis at a worksite for a consecu�ve six-month period calculated as a monthly average.
MM AQ -02- Fugi�ve Dust Control Plan : Due to the size of the Project Area, a Fugi�ve Dust Control Plan is not needed for the Project, However, in order to mi�gate the effects of fugi�ve dust during Project construc�on and comply with SCAQMD rules, the Project must implement the establish ed procedures in Rule 403 and follow the applica�on of standard BMPs in construc�on and opera�on ac�vi�es, such as the following:
• The applica�on of water or chemical stabilizers to
disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by applica�on
of water, haul vehicles, restric�ng vehicle speeds on
unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from
paved site access roadways, cessa�on of construc�on
ac�vity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a
permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites
• Applica�on of the best available dust control measures are used for grading opera�ons and include the
applica�on of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quan�ty to prevent the genera�on of visible dust
plumes.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 47 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Air Quality a) con�nued… • Require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving opera�ons would occur.
MM AQ-03: Construc�on Idling: During Project construc�on, the Project contractor must install clear signage around the Project Site reminding construc�on workers to limit idling of construc�on equipment pursuant to the California Air Resource Board’s In -use Off Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regula�on.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Biological
Resources
a) Have a substan�al adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifica�ons,
on any species iden�fied as a
candidate, sensi�ve, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regula�ons, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Standard Condi�on
SC BIO -01- Stephan’s Kangaroo Rat : Since the Project Site is located within the Mi�ga�on Fee Area of the Stephan’s’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conserva�on Plan (SKR HCP), the developer will be required to pay fair share SKR HCP Mi�ga�on Fees prior to issuance of building permits and development of the Project pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.06,
Threatened and Endangered Species.
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM BIO-02- Pre-construc�on Nes�ng Bird Survey: If construc�on occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construc�on clearance survey for nes�ng birds should be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegeta�on removal or ground disturbing ac�vi�es to ensure that no nes�ng birds will be disturbed during construc�on.
a) Construc�on should stay outside of a no -disturbance buffer. The size of the no disturbance buffer will be determined by the wildlife biologist
b) Limits of construc�on will occur to avoid an ac�ve nest and will be established in the field via flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construc�on personnel will be instructed on the sensi�vity of next areas.
c) A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and monitor the ac�ve nest to ensure that nes�ng behavior is not adversely affected by the construc�on ac�vity.
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 48 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Biological
Resources
a) Con�nued…
MM BIO -03- Burrowing Owl: Prior to the issuance of building permits and Project construc�on and any ground disturbing ac�vi�es, the City of Moreno Valley’s Planning Division and City Building and/or Grading Inspector shall verify that a 30 -day pre- construc�on burrowing owl clearance survey shall be conducted and that the results of the survey are nega�ve for burrowing owl presence at the Project Site.
Prior to issuance
of Permits
City Planning Division,
City Building Official,
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Cultural
Resources
a) Cause a substan�al adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to
§15064.5?
MM CUL-01: Archeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall retain a professional archaeologist to conduct monitoring of all ground -disturbing ac�vi�es. The Project Archaeologist shall have the authority to temporarily redirect earthmoving ac�vi�es in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construc�on. The Project Archaeologist, in consulta�on with the Consul�ng Tribe(s) including Pechanga Band of Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Na�on (formerly known as the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Monitoring P lan (CRMP) as defined in CR- 3. The Project archeologist shall atend the pre- grading mee�ng with the City, the construc�on manager and any contractors, and Consul�ng Tribal representa�ves; and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�v ity Training to those in atendance. The archaeological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving ac�vi�es in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permit
Planning Division and
Building Official, City’s
Archaeological and
Paleontological
Monitors, Developer,
Contractor and
Builder, Pechanga
Band of Indians,
Morongo Band of
Mission Indians,
Rincon Band of
Luiseño Indians,
Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians, Agua
Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians,
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
(formerly known as
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians)
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM CUL-02: Na�ve American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit(s), the Developer shall secure agreements with the Pechanga Band of Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Na�on (formerly known as the San Manuel Band of
Mission Indians), for tribal monitoring. The Developer is also required to provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance no�ce to the Prior to the
issuance of
grading permit(s)
Project Builder/
Developer/Contractor,
Pechanga Band of
Indians, Morongo
Band of Mission
Indians, Rincon Band
of Luiseño Indians,
Soboba Band of
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 49 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
a) Con�nued…
tribes of all ground disturbing ac�vi�es. The Na�ve American Tribal Representa�ves shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth moving ac�vi�es in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Na�ve American Monitor(s) shall atend the pre -grading mee�ng with the Project Archaeologist, City, the construc�on manager and any contractors and will conduct the Tribal Perspec�ve of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�vity Training to those in atendance.
Luiseno Indians, Agua
Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians, and
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
(formerly known as
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians),
Project Archeologist,
construc�on manager
MM CUL -03: Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The Project Archaeologist, in consulta�on with the Consul�ng Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a CRMP in consulta�on pursuant to the defini�on in AB52 to address the details, �ming and responsibility of all archaeological and cult ural ac�vi�es that will occur on the project site. A consul�ng Tribe is defined as a Tribe that ini�ated the AB 52 tribal consulta�on process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consulta�on process, and has completed AB 52 consulta�on with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Sec�on 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project descrip�on and loca�on
b. Project grading and development scheduling;
c. Roles and responsibili�es of individuals on the Project; d. The pre-grading mee�ng and Cultural Resources Worker Sensi�vity Training details;
e. The protocols and s�pula�ons that the contractor, City, Consul�ng Tribe (s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources
discoveries, human remains/crema�ons, sacred and
ceremonial items, including any newly d iscovered
cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a
cultural resources evalua�on.
f. The type of recorda�on needed for inadvertent finds
and the s�pula�ons of recorda�on of sacred items.
g. Contact informa�on of relevant individuals for the Project.
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
and Project
ini�a�on.
Project Archeologist in
consulta�on with
Consul�ng Tribe(s)
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 50 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
a) Con�nued…
MM CUL -04: Cultural Resource Disposi�on . In the event that Na�ve American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing ac�vi�es (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposi�on of the discoveries:
A. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preserva�on-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible.
Preserva�on in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no development
affec�ng the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mi�ga�on Measure MM CUL-03. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in
perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur un�l all legally required cataloging and basic recorda�on have been completed. No recorda�on of sacred items is permited without the writen consent of all Consul�ng Na�ve American Tribal
Governments as defined in
MM CUL-03. The loca�on for the
future reburial area shall be iden�fied on a confiden�al
exhibit on file with the City and concurred to by the
Consul�ng Na�ve American Tribal Governments prior to
cer�fica�on of the environmental document.
In the event that
Na�ve American
cultural resources
are discovering
during ground
disturbing
ac�vi�es
(inadvertent
discoveries.
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM CUL-05: Archaeological Resources. The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan:
- If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground –disturbing ac�vi�es and the Project
Archaeologist and/or Na�ve American Tribal Representa�ves are not present, the construc�on supervisor is obligated to ha lt w o rk in a 10 0-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representa�ves to the site to assess the significance of the find.
Prior to the
issuances of
grading permit
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division,
Construc�on
supervisor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 51 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
a) Con�nued…
MM CUL -06: Inadvertent Finds . If poten�al historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excava�on or construc�on ac�vi�es at the project site that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to Project approval, all ground disturbing ac�vi�es in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person mee�ng the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representa�ves, and all site monitors per the Mi� ga�on Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alterna�ve measures to avoid,
minimize or mi�gate nega�ve effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery un�l a treatment plan has been prepared and approved by all Consul�ng Par�es, then work may resume a�er the treatment plan has been completed. Work shall be allowed to con�nue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by addi�onal archeologist and Tribal Monitors, if needed. Determina�ons and recommenda�ons by the consultant shall be immediately submited to the Planning Division for considera�on and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Developmen t Department Director, in consulta�on with the State Historic Preserva�on Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consul�ng Na�ve American Tribes as defined in
MM CUL -03:
Cultural Resource Monitoring Plan (CRMP) before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consulta�on with the Tribe, and shall be submited to the City and Consul� ng Tribes for their review and approval prior to implementa�on of the said plan.
If poten�al
historic or cultural
resources are
uncovered during
excava�on or
construc�on
ac�vi�es at the
project site that
were not
assessed by the
archaeological
report(s) and/or
environmental
assessment
conducted prior
to Project
approval
A qualified person
mee�ng the Secretary
of the Interior's
standards
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM CUL-07: Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspec�on, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such Prior to final
inspec�on
Project
developer/permit
holder, Project
Archeologist
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 52 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
a) Con�nued… reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensi�vity training for the construc�on staff held during the pre-grade mee�ng. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mi�ga�on compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condi�on.
Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submited to the Eastern Informa�on Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submited to the Consul�ng Tribe(s) Cultural Resources
Department(s).
b) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formally dedicated
cemeteries?
a) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formally dedicated
cemeteries?
MM CR 7 Human Remains. If human remains and/or crema�ons are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area un�l the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to origin.
A. Should human remains and/or crema�ons be
encountered on the surface or during any and all
ground-disturbing ac�vi�es (i.e., clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post
placement and removal, construc�on excava�on,
excava�on for all water supply, electrical, and irriga�on lines, and landscaping phases of any kind), work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall immediately
stop within a 100-foot perimeter of the discovery. The
area shall be protected; project personnel/observers
will be restricted. The County Coroner is to be contacted within 24 hours of discovery. The County Coroner has 48 hours to make his/her determina�on pursuant to State
and Safety Code §7050.5. and Public Resources Code
(PRC) § 5097.98.
B. In the event that the human remains and/or crema�ons are iden�fied as Na�ve American, the Coroner shall
no�fy the Na�ve American Heritage Commission within
24 hours of determina�on pursuant to subdivision (c) of HSC §7050.5.
At the �me
human remains
are encountered
during Project
construc�on.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Field Crew/ Personnel,
County Coroner
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 53 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Cultural
Resources
b) Con�nued…
C. The Na�ve American Heritage Commission shall
immediately no�fy the person or persons it believes to
be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD has 48
hours, upon being granted access to the Project site, to inspect the site of discovery and make his/her
recommenda�on for final treatment and disposi�on,
with appropriate dignity, of the remains and all
associated grave goods pursuant to PRC §5097.98
D. No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with writen approval by the consul�ng Tribe[s].
MM CUL -09: Non -Disclosure of Reburial Loca�ons . I t i s understood by all par�es that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Na�ve American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the Californ ia Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemp�on set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., par�es, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure informa�on related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemp�on set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).
Upon the reburial
of Na�ve
American remain
or associated
grave goods
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
County Coroner
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 54 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) Directly or indirectly cause
poten�al substan�al adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or
soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project, and poten�ally result in on -
or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefac�on
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
crea�ng substan�al direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
MM GEO-01: Fill Materials-
A. During earthwork, iden�fy loca�ons of fill soils that have not been properly compacted and cer�fied and
excavate and recompact these areas. Prior to backfilling, the botom of the excava�on should be observed by the
Project Geotechnical Engineer to verify no addi�onal
removal or recompac�ng is required.
B. During earthwork, the contractor shall verify that fi ll soils are placed in li�s approximately 6 inches thick
according to the geotechnical engineer’s
recommenda�ons, moisture-condi�oned to a minimum
of 2 percent above op�mum moisture-content and
compacted to achieve at least 95 percent maximum
density based on ASTM Test Method D1557.
C. During earthwork, the contractor shall verify that
Imported Fill should consist of a well -graded, slightly cohesive, fine silty sand or sandy silt, with rela�vely
impervious characteris�cs when compacted. This
material should be approved by the Soils Engineer prior to use and should typically possess the following
characteris�cs:
a. Percentage Passing No. 200 Sieve= 20 to 50
b. Plas�city Index= 10 maximum
c. UBC Standard 29 -2 Expansion Index = 15
maximum
D. During earthwork the contractor shall work with the
soils engineer to verify suitability of soils for structure founda�ons. The soils engineer has the op�on of
rejec�ng any compacted material regardless of the
degree of compac�on if that material is considered to
be unstable or if future instability is suspected.
During earthwork
throughout
Project
construc�on and
prior to
backfilling.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer and Building
Official and City
Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-02: Minimize Post-construc�on Soil Movement- In order to reduce post-construc�on soil movement and provide uniform support for the buildings, proposed parking, driver areas, and other founda�ons, the Project contractor in coordina�on with the Project Geotechnical Engineer and City’s Engineer should abide by During Project
implementa�on
(construc�on)
and ground
disturbing
ac�vi�es.
Project D eveloper/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 55 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
the following during Project construc�on and ground disturbing ac�vi�es:
A. Overexcava�on and recompac�on within the proposed
building footprint areas should be performed to a
minimum depth of at least five (5) feet below exis�ng
grades or two (2) feet below the botom of the proposed
founda�on bearing grades. In addi�on, any fill soil
present in the building area should be removed and re - placed as compacted Engineered Fill. The
overexcava�on and recompac�on should also extend
laterally five feet (5’) beyond edges of the proposed
foo�ngs or building limits.
B. Overexcava�on and recompac�on of the near surface
soil in the proposed parking area should be performed
to a minimum depth of at least twelve (12) inches below exis�ng grades or proposed subgrade, whichever is
deeper. The actual depth of the overexcava� on and
recompac�on should be determined by the
geotechnical engineer or authorized representa�ve for
the geotechnical engineer during construc�on. The
overexcava�on and recompac�on should also extend
laterally at least three (3) feet beyond edges of the
proposed paving limits or to the property boundary. Any undocumented fill encountered during grading should
be removed and replaced with Engineered Fill.
C. Overexcava�on and recompac�on of the soil in
proposed street improvements and driveway
approaches should be performed to a minimum depth
of at least eighteen (18) inches below exis�ng grades or proposed subgrade, whichever is deeper. The actual
depth of the overexcava�on and recompac�on should
be determined by
the geotechnical engineer or
authorized representa�ve for the geotechnical engineer
during construc�on. The overexcava�on and
recompac�on should also extend laterally at least three (3) feet beyond edges of the proposed paving limits or
to the property boundary. Any undocumented fill
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 56 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
encountered during grading should be removed and
replaced with Engineered Fill.
MM GEO -03: Concrete Slabs -on-grade- Unless designed by the project structural engineer, concrete slabs -on-grade should be verified by the City Inspector, ongoing during construc�on, as a minimum of five (5) inches thick and reinforced per the geotechnical engineer’s recommenda�ons, that the concrete slab be reinforced to reduce crack separa�on and possible ver�cal offset at the cracks with at least No. 3 reinforcing bars placed on 18-inch centers. Thicker floor slabs with increased concrete strength and reinforcem ent should be designed wherever heavy concentrated loads, heavy equipment, or machinery will be placed.
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, and Building
Official City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -04: Winteriza�on - The Contractor shall winterize the Project Site prior to the start of and throughout the rainy season (generally October 15th to April 15th) to prevent upper soils from becoming very moist during the winter months due to rain and the absorp�ve characteris�cs of the soils. Winteriza�on shall consist of placement of materials on aggregate base and protec�ng (eleva�ng and covering) exposed soils during the construc�on phase.
Prior to and
during wet winter
months of Project
construc�on.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
and City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -05: Traffic Indices - Prior to issuance of the final tract map and permits, the City Engineer and/or Building Official shall verify that street improvement plans and construc�on drawings for the Project show the correct numeric value for the
recommended Traffic Index for pavement. Installa�on per this standard shall be field verified by the City Inspector The following table shows the recommended pavement sec�ons for various traffic indices:
Traffic
Index
Asphal�c
Concrete
Class II Aggregate
Base*
Compacted
Subgrade**
4.0 2.0” 4.0” 18.0”
4.5 2.5” 4.0” 18.0”
5.0 2.5” 4.0” 18.0”
5.5 3.0” 4.0” 18.0”
6.0 3.0” 4.0” 18.0”
6.5 3.5” 4.0” 18.0”
Throughout
Project
construc�on and
repaving.
Project Developer/
Builder/Contractor,
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, City
Engineer, Building
Official, City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 57 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
7.0 4.0” 4.0” 18.0”
7.5 4.0” 4.0” 18.0”
The recommended Traffic Index applied to the Project shall be verified by the geotechnical engineer prior to paving. If a higher Traffic Index is required, this shall be obtained from the geotechnical engineer.
The following recommenda�ons are for light-duty and heavy-duty Portland Cement Concrete pavement sec�ons.
Portland Cement Pavement
Light Duty
Traffic
Index
Portland Cement
Concrete***
Class II
Aggregate
Base*
Compacted
Subgrade**
4.5 5.0” -- 12.0”
Heavy Duty
Traffic
Index
Portland Cement
Concrete***
Class II
Aggregate
Base*
Compacted
Subgrade**
7.0 6.5” -- 12.0”
Note: * 95% compac�on based on ASTM Test Method D1557 or CAL 216
**95% compac�on based on ASTM Test Method D1557
or CAL 216
***Minimum compressive strength of 3,000 psi
MM GEO -06: Infiltra�on Systems - Prior to issuance of the final tract map and permits, the City Engineer and the Building Official shall verify that plans show appropriate setbacks for infiltra�on systems. City inspec�ons shall confirm implementa�on as follows:
It is recommended that the loca�on of the infiltra�on systems not be closer than ten feet (10’) as measured laterally from the edge of the adjacent property line, ten feet (10’) from the outside edge of any founda�on and five (5’) from the edge of any r ight-of way to the outside edges of the infiltra�on system.
If the infiltra�on loca�on is within ten feet (10’) of the proposed founda�on, it is recommended that this infiltra�on system should be impervious from the finished ground surface to a depth that During Grading
and Construc�on
City Engineer, City
Building Official, City
Inspector, and
Contractor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 58 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
will achieve a diagonal distance of a minimum of ten feet (10’) below the botom of the closest foo�ng in the project.
MM GEO-07: Founda�ons (Conven�onal Final Founda�on
Systems): Prior to issuance of permits, the City Engineer and Building Official shall verify that plans show compliance with the following founda�on requirements:
During construc�on, t he Contractor, geotechnical engineer, and City Inspector shall verify that proposed structures are supported property on a shallow founda�on system bearing a minimum of three (3) feet of Engineered Fill.
Spread and con�nuous foo�ngs can be designed for the following maximum allowable soil bearing pressures:
1. Dead Load Only- 2,000 psf Allowable Loading
2. Dead-Plus-Live Load- 2,600 Allowable Loading
3. Total Load, including wind or seismic loads - 3,500 psf Allowable Loading
The foo�ngs should be a minimum depth of 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, which is lower.
Foo�ngs should have a minimum width of 15 inches, regardless of load.
Prior to issuance
of permits
Throughout
Project
construc�on
City Engineer, Building
Official
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, Project
contractor and City
Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-08: Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork : Prior to issuance of permits, the City Engineer and Building Official shall verify that plans show compliance with the following floor slab and flatwork requirements:
During construc�on, the Contractor, geotechnical engineer, and City Inspector shall verify that proposed structures are properly supported as follows:
A. concrete slab-on-grade floors should be underlain by a water vapor retarder. The water vapor retarder should
be installed in accordance with accepted engineering
prac�ces. The water vapor retarder should consist of a
vapor retarder shee�ng underlain by a minimum of 3
inches of compacted, clean, gravel of ¾ -inch maximum
size.
B. To aid in concrete curing an op�onal 2 to 4 inches of granular fill may be placed on top of the vapor retarder.
The granular fill should consist of damp clean sand with Prior to issuance
of permits
Throughout
Project
construc�on
City Engineer, Building
Official
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, Project
contractor and City
Inspector.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 59 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
at least 10 to 30 percent of the sand passing the 100
sieve.
C. It is recommended that the concrete slab be reinforced to reduce crack separa�on and possible ver�cal offset at the cracks; at least No. 3 reinforcing bars on 18 -inch centers, be used for this purpose. Exterior finish grades should be a minimum of 2 percent away from all interior slab areas to preclude ponding of water adjacent to
structures.
D. It is recommended that the u�lity trenches within the structure be compacted, as specified in our report, to
reduce the transmission of moisture through the u�lity
trench backfill. Special aten�on to the immediate
drainage and irriga�on around the bui
lding is
recommended.
MM GEO-09: Lateral Earth Pressures and Retaining Walls- Prior to issuance of permits the City shall verify that plans show w alls retaining horizontal backfill and capable of deflec�ng a minimum of 0.1 percent of its height at the top may be designed using an equivalent fluid ac�ve pressure of 39 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. Walls incapable of this deflec�on or a re fully constrained walls against deflec�on may be designed for an equivalent fluid at-rest pressure of 59 pounds per square foot per foot of depth.
During grading and backfilling opera�on adjacent to any walls, the contractor/builder and city inspector shall verify that heavy equipment is not allowed to operate within a lateral distance of 5 feet from the wall, or within a la teral distance equal to the wall height, whichever is greater, to avoid developing excessing lateral pressures.
Prior to issuance
of permits
Throughout
Project
construc�on
City Engineer, Building
Official
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, Project
contractor and City
Inspector.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO-10: Tes�ng and Inspec�on- Throughout construc�on the Contractor/Builder and City Inspector shall verify that the geotechnical engineer or his authorized representa�ve are present at the site during the earthwork ac�vi�es to confirm that actual subsurface condi�ons are consistent with the exploratory During earthwork
ac�vi�es for the
dura�on of
construc�on.
Project Geotechnical
Engineer, Project
Contractor/Builder
City Inspector
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 60 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), c), & d) Con�nued…
fieldwork and that proper compac�on and tes�ng are performed for structure founda�ons . Earthwork construc�on is dependent upon compac�on tes�ng and stability of the material and it is the duty of the City Inspector to ensure that proper compac�on and tes�ng are performed during construc�on.
MM GEO-11: Site Prepara�on - During all construc�on ac�vi�es, the Builder/Contractor and City Inspector shall verify that:
a) General site clearing should include removal of
vegeta�on; exis�ng u�li�es; structures including
founda�ons; exis�ng stockpiled soil; trees and
associated root systems; rubble; rubbish; and any loose and/or saturated materials.
b) Site stripping should extend to a minimum depth of 2 to 4 inches, or un�l all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed. Deeper stripping may be required
in localized areas.
c) These materials will not be suitable for use and should not be used as Engineered Fill. However, stripped
topsoil may be stockpiled and reused in landscape or
non-structural areas.
During ground
disturbances and
during
earthworks.
Builder/ Contractor
City Inspector.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM GEO -12: Permanent Drainage and Landscape - Prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, the City Engineer, Planning Division and Building Official shall verify that plans for construc�on and the CC&Rs for the Project include the following specifica�ons for establishing and maintaining proper drainage in perpetuity. The City Inspector and Contractor shall be responsible for implemen�ng these throughout construc�on. Long-term maintenance of items a) through h) below shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Bui lding Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.:
A. Ground surface adjacent to founda�ons shall be sloped a minimum of 5 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet
away from structures, or to an approved alterna�ve means of drainage conveyance.
Verified Ini�ally
during Plan Check
Prior to Issuance
of Final Tract Map
Approval and
Permits. Verified
Throughout
Project
construc�on.
Verified a�er
CC&R recorda�on
and prior to
issuance of first
cer�ficate of
occupancy
Ini�al Verifica�on by
the City Engineer,
Planning D ivision and
Building Official .
Verified During
Construc�on by the
City Inspector and
Project contractor.
HOA. Verified in
recorded CC&Rs prior
to issuance of the first
cer�ficate of
occupancy.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 61 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
b) Result in substan�al soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil?
B. Swales used for conveyance of drainage and located within 10 feet of founda�ons shall be sloped a minimum of 2
percent. Impervious surfaces, such as pavement and
exterior concrete flatwork, within 10 feet of building
founda�ons should be sloped a minimum of 2 percent
away from the structure.
C. Drainage gradients shall be maintained to carry all surface water to collec�on facili�es and off- site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project.
D. Slots or weep holes should be placed in drop inlets or other surface drainage devices in pavement areas to allow free drainage of adjoining base course materials.
E. Cutoff walls should be installed at pavement edges
adjacent to vehicular traffic areas; these walls should
extend to a minimum depth of 12 inches below pavement
subgrades to limit the amount of seepage water that can infiltrate the pavements. Where cutoff
walls are
undesirable subgrade drains can be constructed to
transport excess water away from planters to drainage
interceptors. If cutoff walls can be successfully used at the site, construc�on of subgrade drains is considered
unnecessary.
F. Drainage pipes should be placed with perfora�ons down and should discharge in a non -erosive manner away from founda�ons and other improvements. The pipes should be
placed no higher than 6 inches above the heel of the wall, in the center line of the drainage blanket and should have a minimum diameter of four inches.
G. Collector pipes may be either sloted or perforated. Slots should be no wider than ⅛ inch in diameter, while
perfora�ons should be no more than ¼ inch in diameter.
If retaining walls are less than 6 feet in height, the
perforated pipe may be omited in lieu of weep holes on 4 feet maximum spacing.
H. The weep holes should consist of 4 -inch diameter holes (concrete walls) or unmortared head joints (masonry
walls) and not be higher than 18 inches above the lowest J.1.o
Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 62 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Geology and
Soils
a) ii), b), c), & d) Con�nued…
adjacent grade. Two 8-inch square overlapping patches of geotex�le fabric (conforming to CalTrans Standard
Specifica�ons for “edge drains”) should be affixed to the
rear wall opening of each weep hole to retard soil piping. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
MM PALEO -01: Paleontological Monitor - Prior to the start of Project construc�on, a qualified paleontological monitor shall be retained by the Project developer and be present during grading in project areas where paleontological resources are likely to reside within the underlying geologic forma�ons. In addi�on, the paleontological monitor shall be present during earthwork ac�vi�es that expose soils beyond depths of previous disturbance.
Prior to the start
of Project
construc�on and
earthwork
ac�vi�es.
Project developer and
Paleontological
Monitor
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Hazards and
Hazardous
Materials
a) Create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment
through the rou�ne transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
MM HAZ -01- Groundwater Monitoring Wells : During Project construc�on, the Project contractor shall protect exis�ng groundwater monitoring wells by crea�ng a buffer zone that includes placing k -rails around the perimeter of the wells. In a d d i � o n , i t i s r e q u i r e d b y M a r c h A i r F o r c e B a s e t h a t a 1 0-foot buffer be maintained between the areas where heavy equipment is in use in rela�on to the wells.
During Project
construc�on.
Project Builder/
Contractor and City
Inspector.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
c) Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an
exis�ng or proposed school?
MM HAZ-02- Coordina�on with Val Verde School District: Prior to start of construc�on for the Project, the Contractor shall provide the construc�on schedule to the Val Verde School District. The contractor shall coordinate with the school district on an ongoing basis during construc�on and shall keep records of this coordina�on at the Project Site for review by the grading and building inspectors.
Prior to start of
construc�on.
Project Builder/
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM HAZ -03- Hazardous Materials Manifest and Plan: Prior to issuance of permits, the contractor shall provide a manifest of construc�on materials and a plan for proper handling, disposal, con�ngency, and emergency response to the Building Official and fire department for verifica�on of adequate con�ngency
measures in regard to poten�ally hazardous materials used, stored and handled onsite during construc�on. Contractor compliance shall be monitored throughout construc�on
Prior to the
issuance of
permits and
throughout
construc�on.
Project Contractor and
City Inspectors.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 63 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substan�ally degrade surface or
ground water quality?
MM HYDRO-01- Water Quality Best Management Prac�ces: Upon Project implementa�on, the maintenance of water quality is the responsibility of the property owner, which was disclosed within a statement of compliance prior to the purchase from the builder.
The Homeowners Associa�on (HOA) and City or County ar e responsible for enforcing the Water Quality Management Plan if the resident is not adhering to the following WQMP best management prac�ces and requirements:
Treatment Control BMP:
1. A F l o g a r d + P l u s C B i n s e r t fi l t e r s h a l l b e u s e d a s a treatment control to provide proprietary treatment
mechanisms to treat poten�al pollutants in runoff. The
Flogard +Plus CB insert has a removal efficiency of
approximately 80% and removes proprietary pol lutants
of concern including sediment, gross solids, trash, and petroleum hydrocarbons.
Permanent Structural Source Control BMPs:
1. At the loca�on of drainage inlets, install storm drain markers “Only Rain Down the Drain/ Drains to Lake”.
2. Implement a landscaping plan that will achieve the
following:
a. Preserve exis�ng na�ve trees, shrubs, and
groundcover to the maximum extent possible.
b. Design landscaping to minimize irriga�on and
runoff, to promote surface infiltra�on and
runoff where appropriate, and to minimize
the use of fer�lizers and pes�cides that can
contribute to stormwater pollu�on.
c. Where landscaped areas are used to retain or
detain stormwater, specify plants that are
tolerant of saturated soil condi�ons.
d. Consider using pest -resistant plants,
especially adjacent to hardscape.
e. To ensure successful establishment, select
plants appropriate to site soils, slopes,
climate, sun, wind, rain, land use, air
Upon Project
implementa�on.
Property Owners,
Homeowner’s
Associa�on
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 64 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) con�nued…
movement, ecological consistency, and plant
interac�ons.
3. HOA CC&Rs shall outline where site refuse and recycled materials will be handled and stored for pickup. If
dumpsters or other receptables are outdoors, state how
the designated area will be covered, graded, and paved to prevent run -on and show loca�ons of berms to prevent
runoff from the area. Signs will be posted on or near
dumpsters sta�ng “Do not dump hazardous materials
here" or similar.
4. Cover outdoor storage areas; grade and berm outdoor
storage areas to prevent run-on or run-off from area.
5. Storage of non-hazardous liquids shall be covered by a roof and/or drain to the sanitary sewer system, and be
contained by berms, dikes, liners, or vaults.
6. Storage of hazardous materials and waste must be in
compliance with the local hazardous materials ordinance and a Hazardous Materials Management Plan for the site.
7. A detailed descrip�on of materials stored within storage area and structural features shall be provide by the
Property owner to prevent pollutants from entering storm drains.
8. Provide a means to drain fire sprinkler test water to the sanitary sewer.
9. Roo�op equipment with poten�al to produce pollutants shall be roofed and/or have secondary containment.
10. Avoid roofing, guters, and trim made of copper or other unprotected metals that may leach into runoff.
Opera�onal Source Control BMPs:
1. Maintain and periodically repaint or replace inlet
markings.
2. Provide stormwater pollutant preven�on informa�on to new site owners, lessees, or operators.
3. Maintain landscaping using minimum or no pes�cides.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 65 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Hydrology and
Water Quality
a) con�nued… 4. Provide an adequate number of receptacles. Inspect receptacles regularly; repair or replace leaky
receptacles. Keep receptacles covered.
5. Prohibit/ Prevent dumping of liquid of hazardous
wastes. Post “no hazardous materials” signs. Inspect
and pick up liter daily and clean up spills immediately.
Keep spill control materials available on-site.
6. Sweep plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots regularly to prevent accumula�on of liter and debris. Collect debris from pressure washing to prevent entry into the storm
drain system. Collect wash water containing any
cleaning agent or degreaser and discharge
to the
sanitary sewer not to a storm drain.
Noise
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established
in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
MM NOI-01- Noise Atenua�on: Prior to issuance of the final tract map and permits the Building Official and the Planning D ivision shall verify that a six-foot concrete wall as shown on Figure 7: Site Plan, and in the CC&Rs for the Project will be constructed and maintained so that exterior noise levels do not exceed the City’s exterior noise level criteria of 65 dBA CNEL. The wall should be con�nuous, solid, without holes or cracks and be maintained in perpetuity by the HOA.
Prior to issuance of permits and as verified through construc�on inspec�ons, the Building Official and the Planning Department shall verify that construc�on plans include noise atenua�ng windows described as follows: To achieve interior noise levels less than 45 dBA CNEL, windows and sliding glass doors on the north, west, and south facing facades of the first row of homes from Indian Avenue shall have an Sound Transmission Class (STC) ra�ng of at least 30. This shall be maintained according to CC&Rs enforced by the HOA.
Long-term maintenance of the noise attenuating walls and windows above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Division prior to issuance of the first final certificate of occupancy.
Prior to issuance
of the final tract
maps, permits
and throughout
construc�on and
verified in the
recorded CC&Rs
Building Official and
the Planning D ivision,
building inspectors
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 66 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Noise
a) Continued…
Best Management Prac�ces
BMP NOI -01: Noise Best Management Prac�ces - Prior to the issuances of building permits and grading permits, the Project contractor shall be provided Project plans that include the following specifica�ons to minimize construc�on noise emana�ng from the proposed Project:
1. All equipment, whether fixed or mobile, will be
equipped with properly opera�ng and maintained
mufflers, consistent with manufacturer standards.
2. All sta�onary construc�on equipment will be placed so that emited noise is directed away from the noise
sensi�ve receptors nearest the Project Site.
3. As applicable, all equipment shall be shut off and not le� in idle when not in use.
4. To the degree possible, equipment staging will be
located in areas that create the greatest distance
between construc�on -related noise and vibra�on
sources and exis�ng sensi�ve receptors.
5. Jackhammers, pneuma�c equipment, and all other
portable sta�onary noise sources will be directed away
and shielded from exis�ng residences in the vicinity of the Project Site. Either one- inch plywood or sound
blankets can be u�lized for this purpose. T hey should
reach up from the ground and block the line of sight
between equipment and exis�ng residences. The
shielding should be without holes and cracks.
6. No amplified music and/or voice will be allowed on the Project Site.
7. Haul truck deliveries will not occur outside of the hours presented as exempt for construc�on per City of
Moreno Valley Municipal Code Sec�ons 8.14.040 and
11.80.030(D)(7).
8. The use of vibratory rollers will be limited within 26 feet and large bulldozers within 15 feet of the exis�ng
residen�al structures to the south of the Project Site.
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
and grading
permits.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 67 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Noise Through the City’s standard applica�on of plan check and review process, the City of Moreno Valley will verify noise BMPs are stated on approved plans.
b) Genera�on of excessive
groundborne vibra�on or
groundborne noise levels?
See BMP NIO-01: Noise Best Management Prac�ces. Prior to the issuance of
building permits
and grading
permits.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Public Services
and U�li�es
a) Result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of
the public services:
iii) Schools?
MM PUB-01- School Fees: Prior to the issuance of the final tract map and permits, City Building Official shall verify that the Developer/Builder has paid required school fees to the City based on square footage of new structures for mitigation of impacts from increased enrollment. Payment of the Development Impact Fee.
Prior to the
issuance of the
final tract map
and permits and
Project
construc�on.
City Building Official,
Project
Developer/Builder.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
Transporta�on
a) Conflict with program plan,
ordinance or policy addressing
the circula�on system,
including transit, roadway,
bicycle and pedestrian
facili�es?
SC TRAF-01: Construc�on Traffic Control Plan- Prior to the start of construc�on, the City of Moreno Valley’s standard development review process and condi�ons of approved shall verify that the Project contractor comply with the following or similar condi�ons throughout Project construc�on to ensure minimal traffic impacts during Project construc�on:
- A construc�on work zone traffic control plan that
complies with State/Federal standards as prescribed in
the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CA MUTCD) shall be submited to the City for
review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading
Prior to the start
of construc�on.
City of Moreno Valley
and Project
Contractor.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 68 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Transporta�on a) Con�nued… permit or start of construc�on. The plan shall iden�fy any roadway, sidewalk, bicycle route, or bus stop
closures and detours as well as haul routes and hours of opera�on. All construc�on -related trips shall be
restricted to off-peak hours to the extent possible.
- All on -site and off- site roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements rela�ng
to the proposed project shall be constructed in
accordance with applicable State/Federal engineering
standards.
- Site-adjacent roadways shall be constructed or repaired at their ul�mate half -sec�on width, including
landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunc�on
with development, or as otherwise required by the City
of Moreno Valley. Specifically, the proposed project
includes construc�on of adjacent street improvements
to ul�mate right -of-way width for Goya Avenue and
Indian Street.
- Adequate emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the sa�sfac�on of the Moreno Valley Fire Department.
- The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance
requirements are met in accordance with applicable
sight distance standards.
Tribal Cultural
Resources
a) Cause a substan�al adverse
change in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code Sec�on 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred place,
See Mi�ga�on Measures MM CUL-01: Archeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of
grading permit
Planning Division and
Building Official, City’s
Archaeological and
Paleontological
Monitors, Developer,
Contractor and
Builder, Pechanga
Band of Indians,
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 69 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
Tribal Cultural
Resources
or object with cultural value to a
California Na�ve American tribe, and
that is:
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discre�on and
supported by substan�al evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code sec�on 5024.1 . In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code sec�on 5024.1 , the lead
agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Na�ve American tribe.
a) ii) Con�nued…
Morongo Band of
Mission Indians,
Rincon Band of
Luiseño Indians,
Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians, Agua
Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians,
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
(formerly known as
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians)
See Mi�ga�on Measure MM CUL-02 Na�ve American Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of
grading permit(s)
Project Builder/
Developer/Contractor,
Pechanga Band of
Indians, Morongo
Band of Mission
Indians, Rincon Band
of Luiseño Indians,
Soboba Band of
Luiseno Indians, Agua
Caliente Band of
Cahuilla Indians, and
Yuhaaviatam of San
Manuel Na�on
(formerly known a s
the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians),
Project Archeologist,
construc�on manager
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
See Mi�ga�on Measure MM CUL -03: Cultural Resource
Monitoring Plan (CRMP).
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
and Project
ini�a�on.
Project Archeologist in
consulta�on with
Consul�ng Tribe(s)
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 70 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
U�li�es and
Services
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction of new or
expanded water, wastewater
treatment or storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
MM UTL -01- Neighborhood Coordina�on and Traffic Control :
Prior to issuance of permits , t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r s h a l l v e r i f y t h a t Project plans include a construc�on traffic management plan for the off-site improvements that will be constructed within public right-of-way with the Project (pursuant to city standards outlined in “Traffic Control Plan Guidelines and Checklist” updated 04/20/2022).
Prior to issuance
of permits
City Engineer
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
MM UTL-02- U�lity Purveyor Approval: Prior to issuance of final tract map approval and permits, the City Building Official shall verify that improvement plans for u�lity extensions and connec�ons and service to the structures are approved by each u�lity purveyor.
Prior to issuance
of permits and
final tract map
approval
Building Official
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project
and reasonably foreseeable
future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
MM UTL -03: EMWD Water Conserva�on Policies : Prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits the City Engineer and Planning Department shall verify that EMWD Water Conserva�on Policies are incorporated within the Project’s CC&R’s and construc�on plan set per the following:
1. Irrigate landscape only between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. except when:
o Manually watering;
o Establishing new landscape;
o Temperatures are predicted to fall below
freezing; or
o It is very short period of �me to adjust or repair
an irriga�on system.
2. Unatended irriga�on systems using potable water are
prohibited unless they are limited to no more than 15
minutes watering per day, per sta�on. This limita�on can be extended for:
o Very low flow drip irriga�on systems when no
emiter produces more than two gallons of water
per hour.
o Weather based controllers or stream rotor
sprinklers that meet 70 percent efficiency.
Prior to final tract
map approval and
issuance of
permits
Project City Engineer
and Planning
Department.
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
GOYA AT HERITAGE PARK
MORENO VALLEY, CA
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Goya at Heritage Park Page 71 City of Moreno Valley
Issue Poten�ally Significant Impact
reduced to Less than Significant
with Mi�ga�on Incorporated
Recommended Mi�ga�on Measure Timing Responsible Party Date Completed and Ini�als
U�li�es and
Services
b) Con�nued…
o Runoff or over watering is not permited in any
case.
3. Irriga�on systems operate efficiently and avoid overwatering or watering of hardscape and the resul�ng runoff.
4. Excessive water flow or runoff is prohibited
5. Install new landscaping with low -water demand trees and plants. New turf shall only be installed for func�onal
purposes.
6. Watering during rain is prohibited.
Long-term maintenance of items a) through f) above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
Wildfire
c) Require the installa�on or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other
u�li�es) that may exacerbate
fire r i s k o r t h a t m a y r e s u l t i n
temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
MM WILD -01: HOA Fire Safety - To ensure fire safety and appropriate emergency response, the Homeowner’s Associa�on shall incorporate requirements within the recorded CC&Rs that require property owners to keep the side yard setbacks free and clear of debris year-round.
Long-term maintenance of above requirement shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final cer�ficate of occupancy.
Prior to the
finaliza�on of
HOA CC&Rs.
Property owner, HOA
Ini�als: _________
Date: ___________
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1]
Goya at Heritage Park Page 72 City of Moreno Valley
4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved ( e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards ( e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or another CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15152. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goy
a at Heritage Park Page 73 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code §21099 – Modernization of Transportation Analysis for Transit-Oriented Infill Projects – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Response:
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated . The Project is a low -density two-story residential development that does not meet the definition of “infill project” provided in PRC §21099 because the site is not bordered primarily with improved right-of-way. The Project will implement adjacent roadway improvements and residential development up to 9.43 DU/AC on vacant land that has been approved for residential development up to 5 DU/AC. Proposed structures will be up to 35 feet above ground surface consistent with zoning. The Project Site is within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) associated with a high- quality transit corridor. This means that the City intends to promote higher density complimentary land use and intensify development within the TPA for overall reduction in VMT to promote sustainability.
The City has approved a concept plan for intensified land use and mixed- use development along Perris Boulevard, which is less than 1 mile east of the Project. The nearest transit station is the Moreno Valley/ March Metro Station located at 14160 Meridian Parkway, Riverside CA 92508, approximately five miles northwest of the Project.
A
Scenic Vista is defined in Moreno Valley’s 2021 General Plan, as “Views of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or unusual feature comprising an important or dominant portion of the viewshed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by a particular distant view providing visual relief from less attractive views of nearby features. Views of other designated federal and state lands, as well as local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape.” Scenic vistas may also be associated with Designated Scenic Highways. However, there are no designated Scenic Highways in the City of Moreno Valley. The Project Site is not within view from a Scenic Highway. Therefore, the Project will have no impact on Scenic Highways.
Vi
ews surrounding the Project Site that are considered Scenic Vistas, pursuant to the City’s General Plan definition, include elevated terrain outside City Limits , approximately 1,670 feet higher than the Project Site , to the northwest (approximately 6.6 miles), north (approximately 6.2 miles), northeast (approximately 7.5 miles), east (approximately 9 miles), and southeast (approximately 2.9 miles). To the northwest and north of the Project Site are the Box Spring Mountains (with the Moreno Valley M), the highest peak stands at 3,083 feet ASML. East and southeast of the Project are the Badlands elevated to approximately 3,180 AMSL. In the southeast, Lake Perris State Recreation Area provides open space at an elevation 1,560 AMSL. Due to substantial elevation differences from the Project Site and Local Vicinity, the surrounding mountain ranges lining City Limits, provide prominent views of natural open space and are important scenic vistas visible from vantage points at most urbanized locations within the Local Vicinity and from the Project Site. The Project Site is approximately 1,497 feet above mean sea level (ASML) and finished graded surfaces shown on Project plans will not significantly alter existing ground surface elevations.
Wes
t of the Project Site, Interstate 215 (I-215), and from the north, State Route 60 (SR-60), provide views of the Local Vicinity from elevated regional transportation structures. However, the Project Site is not highly discernable from these freeways due to scale and location. Plans of the Project indicate consistency with the level terrain and uniform low - profile development patterns currently found throughout the Local Vicinity. The Project will have a lower profile than the proposed 3-story structures that have been approved in connection with the Perris Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor and to the north, west, and south of the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would not obstruct views or significantly change the developed skyline of the City of Moreno Valley from these freeway vantage points. The most visible land use in the Local Vicinity from Interstate 215 is March Air Reserve Base and the Industrial Area Specific Plan (SP - 208), directly west of the Project Site. March Air Reserve Base borders the eastern perimeter of I -215 for approximately 3.1 miles.
From regional transportation routes, I -215 and SR-60, the Moreno Valley Mall, The District, Moreno Valley Auto Mall, and World Logistic Center are also visible. These developments are immediately south of SR-60 and east of I-215.
The proposed scale of the Project does not anticipate significant changes from what can be expected under buildout of the existing General Plan and Zoning at the Project site in terms of visibility within the Local Vicinity or obstruction of scenic vistas since maximum height of dwelling units will comply with the City’s Municipal Code development standards J.1.o
Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goy
a at Heritage Park Page 74 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
for two-story buildings. Significant changes from existing conditions in finished ground surface are not anticipated and the maximum allowable structural height of 35 feet above ground surface will be maintained. Plans for the Project indicate compatibility with the existing land use patterns found in the Local Vicinity which consist of a mixture of low - profile retail, institutional, R5 and R10, as well as higher dens ity residential neighborhoods built on flat terrain. T he proposed development is consistent with the intensified land use patterns that were evaluated during the General Plan update process and with what is expected to occur with the buildout of the approved General Plan. Therefore, views associated with the Project Site and Local Vicinity, after the Project is constructed, are expected to remain uniform In addition, the partial public views of the elevated scenic resources that are present from the adjacent public streets near Project Site facing north and east along Indian Street and Goya Avenue, which are shown in Figure 5: Photo Location Map and Figure 6: Site Photos will remain.
Dev
elopment shown on Project plans is visually compatible with single family neighborhoods found to the north, east, and south in the Local Vicinity, consisting of two-story and one-story detached single-family stucco structures with tile roofs. The increased density of the Project is equal to other residential neighborhoods interspersed throughout the Local Vicinity and is not expected to significantly change the existing visual profile in the Local Vicinity. The existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project include a mixture of residential housing ranging between 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC) and the Project is consistent with this pattern of development. Therefore, the Project is not expected to significantly alter visual resources from street -level views associated with the land use patterns found in the Local Vicinity. As a result, consistency with proposed scale, location, and development patterns conclude no significant impacts are anticipated with Project implementation.
The
Project Site borders approximately 634.02 linear feet of Indian Street and approximately 946.35 linear feet of Goya Avenue. The Project will implement design guidelines consistent with General Plan guidance, CC&Rs and an HOA at the Project Site for long- term perpetual management of the neighborhood, which is anticipated to result in enhanced long term visual resources along street level views. Proposed street level views along Indian Street will be varied due to proposed locations of open space and due to articulated building setbacks and the different architectural styles and floor plans proposed with the Project. The retention basin in the southwestern corner of the Project, a 0.05-acre open space area at the northwestern corner, one enhanced vehicular entry with a 36-foot-wide road running east -west for access to the development via Indian Street, landscaped street setbacks with flowering trees, and 10-foot-wide side yard setbacks will provide additional visual variation in street views along Indian Street. Plans indicate the Project is intended to enhance street-level views along Indian Street and Goya Avenue within the Local Vicinity due to proposed architecture and landscaped building setbacks managed through the HOA.
The Pr
oject will implement development that conforms with existing landscaped structural street setbacks set forth in the City’s Municipal Code and are consistent existing conditions in the Local Vicinity. Landscape street setbacks from Goya Avenue and Indian Street that required by the Zoning Code are a minimum of 10- feet to nearest right-of-way boundary line. Inspection of aerial photos of residential development in the Local Vicinity indicates that existing setbacks are 10-feet; therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the development within the Local Vicinity. Plans for the Project indicate improved street-level views associated with the Project due to the decorative perimeter wall and enhanced back facades of detached single -family residences with varied structural setbacks, four complimentary architectural styles, and enhanced second stories visible from both streets per the design guidelines resulting in less than significant impacts. Design guidelines for the Project indicate building facade enhancements will be applied to areas that can be seen from public streets including one or more of the following: landscaped setbacks, decorative pavement, second story window trim and decorative fencing. Mitigation Measures AES-01: Perimeter Fencing, MM AES-02: Landscaping and Irrigation through AES-03: Exterior Finishes , and Standard Condition SC AES -01:
Visual Impacts are proposed to require visual enhancements along Goya Avenue and Indian Street to reduce impacts on local street views. Overall maintenance of landscaping and exterior treatments will be managed by the HOA and CC&Rs for the Project.
While the Project does propose to increase the maximum allowable density at the Project Site through a General Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Zoning Map change, significant visual impacts from Project implementation are not anticipated and are consistent with what was analyzed and approved in the City’s General Plan J.1.o
Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goy
a at Heritage Park Page 75 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Update. As indicated above, the Project will not impact scenic vistas or local street -level views significantly, because plans for the Project indicate consistency with the existing land use patterns in the Local Vicinity. The Project will implement City standards for building height and landscaped street setbacks, underground utilities, underground communication lines and appropriate signage. The Project will incorporate unique design elements, such as decorative perimeter walls and pavement treatment, landscaped buffers, upgraded exterior facades, which will be maintained and managed via CC&Rs and an HOA. Project consistency with existing City ordinances is detailed in Table 19: Project Consistency with Existing Zoning (2040 General Plan - R5 Single-Family Residential Zone)) and in the Land Use and Planning Section of this Report. Refer to Section XI for consistency with policies and goals from Moreno Valley’s Housing Element.
The
City’s PUD discretionary approval process is recommended in the General Plan as a method to give decision makers an opportunity to evaluate the aesthetic details of the Project including intensified land use, project layout, and architecture so that the new development meets aesthetic standards required by the City at each specific location.
Proposed aesthetic elements are shown in Figure 9: Elevations and Figure 8: Landscape Plan . The HOA and CC&Rs will be implemented with the Project, pursuant to Final Tract Map conditions that will establish and maintain specific aesthetic standards for the Project in perpetuity after approval, which are more rigorous than the existing General Plan and zoning on the Project Site. The City must approve and verify the PUD, HOA, and CC&Rs during the plan check process for the Final Tract Map, grading permits and building permits. Exterior building treatment and neighborhood designs for the PUD will be reviewed and approved by the City’s Planning Commission and City Council and enforced through the standard application of the City’s permit process as well as CC&Rs.
With the implementation of Mitigation Measures AES-01, AES-02 and AES-03, and Standard Condition SC AES - 01 and as a result of the discretionary approval and the standard measures and procedures of the City’s plan check and inspection processes, the Project would have a less than significant impact on aesthetics and scenic vistas. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
Response:
No
Impact. See Response I, a). As explained in Response I, a) the Project is in an urbanized area that is not highly visible from outlying vantage points that meet the definition of scenic resources. There are no Scenic Highways near the Project. According to the 2021 General Plan EIR, the closest scenic highway to the Project Site is SR -74, a designated State Scenic Highway, approximately 12.9 miles southeast of the Project Site. The Project Site is not visible from the scenic highway due to its distance. The Project Site currently consists of disturbed dirt surfaces with a row of approximately 6 trees, no rock outcroppings and no historic structures. There are no scenic resources in the Local Vicinity that could be damaged by the Project. Level terrain, existing adjacent development, and distance between the Project Site and important scenic resources identified in the General Plan provide a visual barrier and support a conclusion of no impacts on scenic resources from Project implementation.
The
Project Site has been mostly cleared and the other residential and commercial buildings in the surrounding area are not historically significant due to age and/or condition. Planned development shown in Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map, are proposed to be two and three- stories and located between the Project and the closest historic buildings (approximately one-half mile away). Existing urbanization and the City’s planned development projects in the Local Vicinity will be visual barrier s between the Project and scenic resources within city limits to the north and east. The Project proposes structural heights and landscape street setbacks from Goya Avenue and Indian Street that are consistent with the Zoning Code and City Standards. In addition, proposed structures are comparable to existing one, two-, and three-story structures in adjacent parcels and neighborhoods in the Local Vicinity in terms of building heights, setbacks, and densities. Therefore, the Project will blend into the Local Vicinity and will not be highly visible from outlying areas where historic resources have been identified.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK Goy
a at Heritage Park Page 76 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Site photos show trees within the Goya Avenue planned right -of-way and, no rock outcroppings, or historic buildings adjacent to or on the Project Site that are considered important scenic resources. Site photos show that the Project Site is mostly vacant and void of natural habitat as well as no other scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or historic buildings are visible at this location. According to the cultural resources search conducted for the Project Site (See Appendix C, Table 14: Cultural Resources Summary), there were nine (9) cultural resources studies conducted within the Project Area that resulted in three cultural resources (EIC UC Riverside 2022). The cultural resources that were found include a Farm, Ranch, Privy, Dump, and Trash Scatter. None of these resources are located at or adjacent to the Project Site (approximately 0.35-miles or greater from the Project Site). Additionally, there is no visibility between these resources and the Project. For these reasons, the Project will not have direct or indirect impacts on scenic resources related to historic buildings.
Project plans indicate consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan, General Plan Update, and Housing Element, by promoting high quality development, public gathering places, “people places”, a variety of new housing choices, and enhancement of local street -level views at the Project Site. Project architecture will implement General Plan Objectives supporting high-
quality visual resources by implementing landscaped common corridors, varied rooflines, and differing exterior structural facades to enhance the aesthetics of the Project Site and adjacent areas. See Table 4: Project Elevations for proposed exterior structural facades. The proposed HOA is intended to maintain long- term visual resources of the Project.
For
the reasons above, Project implementation will not have significant impacts or cumulatively considerable impacts to scenic resources. Significant impacts on scenic resources related to public views from scenic or historic resources and structures, removal of trees and rock outcroppings are not anticipated. Therefore, no Mitigation Measures are needed.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage
point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
Response:
Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. See Response I, a) and b) above. The Project is located within an urbanized area of the City Limits. This area includes pockets of vacant or underutilized land that are planned for future development interspersed with development. The Project Site is approved for development with R5 residential land use. Surrounding existing land use patterns in the Local Vicinity depicted in Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Map provide a framework for scenic quality in the Local Vicinity via complimentary mixture of alternating R5 and R10 residential neighborhoods, retail, light industrial and institutional development. Project plans indicate proposed development is similar in terms of size of the PUD as well as code compliant hei ght and landscaped structural street setbacks that can be seen in other existing residential neighborhoods and in the established land use patterns in the Local Vicinity. The Project will incorporate open space, parks and play areas in a proposed neighborhood which is designated as a RS10 low -
density residential development. The existing alternating densities of R5 and R10 neighborhoods in the Local Vicinity provide a variety of housing types consistent with General Plan goals and policies and the Project will not deviate from this pattern. The Project will change street -level views due to the proposed development and density; however, these changes are not considered significant because the General Plan and Zoning for the Project Site allows low density residential development by right and the Project will implement code standards for structural height and setbacks as well as mitigation measures and proposed design features which are consistent with existing conditions. This includes a landscaped buffer and perimeter wall along the full perimeter of the Project to enhance and maintain aesthetic resources within the Local Vicinity. In combination with mitigation measures, proposed scale, design features, and compliance with Moreno Valley Municipal Code, plans indicate the Project is not expected to have significant impact on other urbanized areas within the Local Vicinity. Project impacts on public views at vantage J.1.o
Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 77 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
points that are either adjacent to the Project Site or in outlying areas are not expected to be significantly modified with Project implementation or deviate substantially from what can be expected from buildout under existing R5 General Plan and Zoning designations since building heights will not exceed height restrictions for two- story developments (35 feet) and the Project will implement landscape buffers that will be maintained by an HOA.
The Project will implement mitigation measures MM AES -01- Perimeter Walls, MM AES -02- Landscaping and Irrigation, and MM AES-03- Exterior Finishes, and Standard Condition SC AES-01: Visual Impacts to implement enhanced views along streets. In addition, the Project will be implemented with the PUD, according to a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Commission. Therefore, lessening potentially significant visual impacts from the Project at the site and in the surrounding area.
Existing development standards in the City’s R5 Zone allow the Project Site to support a total of 68 lots with two-story (35 feet high) residential structures. With the application of the RS -10 Zone, the dwelling units at the Project Site will consist of 131 lots with two story residential structures and common area lots for shared community facilities. The Project proposes 20 residential lots rearing along Goya Avenue and 8 residential lots rearing along Indian Street. Fewer units are along Indian Street due to a water quality retention basin and a turf/play area proposed along at the western edge of the Project Site as well as the enhanced entryway for vehicular access from Indian Street via a 36- foot-wide access road. The proposed development is generally consistent with the intensification of land use and increased number of residences that was approved under the existing General Plan Update and Housing Element and evaluated in the EIR for the General Plan Update. Implementation of the PUD, CC&Rs and HOA and the approval of the CUP will result in less than significant Project Impacts due to conflicts with the Municipal Code.
Moreno Valley’s Municipal Code Section 9.03.060: Planned Unit Development, the PUD allows for deviations from site development standards set forth in the applicable zoning district regarding minimum lot area, lot dimensions, lot coverage, and setbacks to accommodate the additional density proposed with the Project. Changes to the Zoning Code include slightly smaller side yard setbacks within the interior lots. However, the heights of the structures will remain consistent with two-story residential developments in the Local Vicinity and would not lead to substantial visual changes seen from adjacent streets. Although, significant impacts from these changes are not anticipated.
As mentioned within Section I, Response b), a landscaping plan is proposed as a buffer between the Project and Goya Avenue and Indian Street (See Figure 8: Landscaping Plan). L andscaping plans show proposed trees comply with mitigation measure MM AES-02- Landscaping and Irrigation and the following City regulations:
Section 14.40.020: Tree Species
• Species for planting shall include species that are indigenous to the area, or/or suitable to the local climate; Site layout shall take into consideration Moreno Valley’s climate by including trees, landscaping, and architectural elements to provide shade, as appropriate for the available root and tree canopy space.
Section 9.17.030: Landscape and irrigation design standards • Landscape plans shall incorporate low water use plants, turf trees, and groundcover adaptable to the area. A list of plants may be found in the county of Riverside’s Guide to California Friendly Landscaping that provides a variety of options to meet the drought tolerant needs of the area while ensuring an aesthetically pleasing landscape.
Section 9.17.090: Water efficiency standards for landscaping • Landscape areas shall consist of predominately plant materials, except for necessary walks and fences/walls. In addition to street trees. Trees shall be planted at the equivalent of one tree per thirty (30) linear feet of building dimension that is visible from the parking lot or public right-of-way.
The standard application of the City’s discretionary permit process, requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the PUD, site plan check, building permits and inspections, and the implementation of the following Mitigation Measures and standard J.1.o
Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 78 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
condition with the proposed development are intended reduce Project impacts related to aesthetics to less than significance by enhancing street -level views with decorative finishes , landscaped buffers, and attractive architectural features. Therefore, cumulatively significant visual impacts as a result of the proposed Project are not anticipated.
Proposed Project improvements will enhance street views via landscaping and architectural finishes. Visual impacts are not anticipated to be cumulatively considerable.
MM AES-01- Perimeter Walls: Prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, the City of Moreno Valley shall verify that Project plans and the recorded CC&Rs for the Project include the following types of perimeter fencing and walls to be installed during construction and maintained in perpetuity throughout Heritage Park Planned Unit Development:
4. Perimeter Block Walls- Perimeter block walls are generally located around the exterior of the neighborhood to provide homes with privacy and noise attenuation from abutting roads and off -site land uses. These Perimeter Block Walls consist of textured split -face concrete solid bricks, with no openings. The wall s hall measure six (6) feet in height as measured from ground surface including two (2) inch high caps. The wall shall include 16-inch block decorative concrete block pilasters with no openings, at each lot line and a change of fence type.
5. Interior Vinyl Fence: Interior Vinyl Fences are generally located between side yards and at the back of residential lots (excluding lots which rear on public streets, which are covered in item 1. above) to provide privacy and security for residents. Interior Vinyl Fences have a height of six (6) feet as measured above ground surface and are constructed of tongue and groove panels, top and bottom rails, and vinyl posts with vinyl caps.
6. Tubular Steel Fence: Tubular Steel Fences are generally located at the perimeters of retention basin areas and dog parks. These Tubular Steel Fences preserve scenic views while maintaining security for residents and visitors of the community. View fences have a maximum height of six (6) feet and are constructed of tubular steel 0.5-inch square 16-gauge palings and 1.5- inch square 14-gauge tubing top and bottom rails. The color finish of the tubular steel fence should complement the community design theme.
The City’s Building Official, Planning Department, and the City Engineer shall verify construction plans show perimeter fencing and concrete block walls, according to items a through c above, within the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development and that perimeter walls and fences will be constructed from materials, colors, and textures that are similar and harmonious with the architecture and earth tones, as indicated on Project Plans, Design Guidelines, and in Figure 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Elevations of the Draft ISMND. Long- term maintenance of items a) through 3) above shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Building Official and Planning Department prior to issuance of the first final certificate of occupancy.
City review of Site Plans, Design Guidelines, CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation for the HOA shall verify that the CC&Rs provide guidelines for perpetual maintenance of all community perimeter fencing and walls for the Project shown on Figure 7: Site Plan of the ISMND. This verification will be done by the City Engineer, Building Official, and/or Planning Department prior to issuance of final approval of the Tract Map and prior to issuance of building and grading permits for the Project and verified again
within the recorded CC&Rs prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Implementation will be verified during Project inspections by the City Building Inspector. Inclusion of the fencing plan and maintenance program shall be included in the recorded CC&Rs by the City Inspector, City Engineer, and Building Official prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.
MM AES-02- Landscaping and Irrigation: The City Building Official, Planning Department, and the City Engineer shall verify prior to Final Tract Map approval and prior to issuance of permits, that Project plans show landscaping and irrigation along Iris Avenue and Goya Avenue providing effective screening and visual buffers between the adjacent public streets and the Project; this includes permanent maintenance through the CC&Rs and HOA. The second stories of the proposed residential structures that are visible from Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall be buffered. Pursuant J.1.o
Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 79 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
to the Heritage Park PUD Design Guidelines, landscaping along Goya Avenue and Indian Street should consist of the following:
Goya Avenue
Goya Avenue shall contain curb separated landscaped parkways maintained by the HOA and adorned with 27 Chinese Pistache trees (or a suitable alternative tree species with similar foliage and mature heights reaching 25- to 35-feet tall and canopies of up to 50-feet wide) that provide a visual buffer between the street and adjacent residential areas. At the Goya Street vehicular entry, a curb- separated walkway lined with four (4) Koelreuteria Bipinnata trees shall be implemented or If an alternative species is selected for implementation it shall provide similar foliage and reach mature heights up to 40- to 60-feet tall with a canopy of up to 30-feet to 40-feet wide.
Indian Street
Indian Street shall feature landscaped parkways, maintained by the HOA, acting as a buffer between the street and surrounding residential areas. Two (2) Crape Myrtle trees (or suitable alternative species reaching 15- feet to 25-feet- tall with a canopy of 6-feet to 15-feet wide) and thirteen (13) Lagerstroemia “Catawba” shall adorn the parkways, while five (5) Saratoga Sweet Bay trees (or suitable alternative with similar foliage and up to 15-feet to 35-feet tall and 15- feet to 35-feet wide at maturity) will create a barrier between the street and the retention basin area to the east. At the Indian Street vehicular entry, planted trees at the curb-separated walkway will consist of four (4) Koelreuteria Bipinnata trees (or a suitable alternative with similar foliage with heights up to 40- to 60-feet tall and a canopy of up to 30-feet to 40-feet wide at maturity.
Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the City Planning Department, Inspector and Building Official shall verify that landscape irrigation and maintenance is included in the recorded CC&Rs for the Project.
MM AES-03- Exterior Finishes: The City’s Building Official and/or Planning Department shall verify prior to final tract map approval and issuance of permits, that plans will show the following architectural details on the front and rear facades (exteriors of residential structures) facing Goya Avenue and Indian Street and from public open space. Plan check shall include verification by the City Engineer, Building Official and Planning Department that CC&Rs for the Project include guidelines for long term maintenance of these features on these specific lots as described below and shown in Figure 7: Site Plan and Figure 9: Elevation Plans in the Draft ISMND and the Design Guidelines for the Project:
F. Building Form, Massing, and Articulation
7. Front and rear building setbacks along Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall be varied.
8. Elevation Plans shown in Figure 9: Elevations of the Draft ISMND provide four architectural styles (Spanish, Ranch, Prairie, and Craftsman). Architectural building styles shall alternate along the streets.
9. Street entry driveways from Goya Avenue and Indian Street shall include decorative pavement and large container trees and plants.
10. Plans shall show plane offsets for façade articulation and varied roof forms.
11. Plans shall show matching structure details, such as window trim and exterior doors, according to the architectural style of the structure.
12. Decorative architectural details will be added to building facades that are visible from adjacent streets and parks. These treatments could include varied and complimentary colors to accentuate building features, brackets or trellises for roof overhangs and projections, stonework, window shutters and decorative trim among others. These details should be applied to enhance the elevations of buildings and create a dynamic and aesthetic in public areas.
G. Windows:
5. Coordinate each elevation’s window shape, size, and location to provide a logical, proportional, and attractive composition consistent with the architectural style.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 80 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
6. Arrange and determine the dimensions of windows in accordance with the conditions of the site, taking into account privacy concerns to the extent possible.
7. Feature windows are encouraged to incorporate enhancements such as recess into the wall plane, enhanced sills with corresponding roof elements, shutters, projecting overhead trellis elements, or decorative grilles if appropriate to the architectural style. All other windows on the front elevation feature trim surrounds, headers and/or sills, or other enhancements consistent with the architectural style of the building.
8. When used, the shape and size of shutters should be proportionate to the window opening and appear as functioning elements.
H. Colors and Materials:
7. Building materials and colors shown on architectural plans are in earthtones. Final color selection should be appropriate to the overall neighborhood design theme and relate to the selected architectural style.
8. Where color or material changes occur on the building, such changes should only occur at inside corners or wrapped to termination points of at least 24 inches that provide a finished appearance from the street.
9. Columns and posts should be enveloped by the color and materials, which should come to an end at the point where the material changes.
10. Apply colors and materials to enhance changes in wall plane, reinforce articulation of elevations, and enhance special features such as entries, single-story elements, etc.
11. Select high-quality, low-maintenance, and durable materials to minimize the need for a replacement that would contribute to landfill waste.
12. Appropriate building materials include, but are not limited to:
- Stucco
- Simulated wood siding
- Natural or manufactured stone veneer
- Natural or manufactured brick veneer
- Metal
- Vinyl Windows
I. Roofs
5. Select roof forms, pitches and materials that are consistent with the architectural style of the building. Consider roof forms in relation to the building mass to improve massing relief along public streets and on other publicly visible elevations.
6. Varied roof forms, offsets and materials consistent with the architectural style of the building are encouraged to create variation in the street level views.
7. Keep roof forms simple and efficient based on the architectural style and plan shape. Avoid overly complicated roof design that detracts from the characteristics of the architectural style.
8. Consider the visual impact of the placement of photovoltaic panels and/or tiles, as well as any solar water heating panels, while designing roof plans. Minimize or group rooftop equipment to leave adequate, continuous space for rooftop photovoltaic systems where feasible.
J. Gutters and Downspouts:
5. Where it is feasible, thoughtful consideration should be given as to the location of the overall guttering system during the architectural design process so that the result is a cohesive building façade in which all elements, including gutters and downspouts, work together to create a pleasing building façade.
6. Whenever possible, downspouts should be located in the least conspicuous location, such as side and rear facades of the building.
7. Exposed gutters and downspouts may be painted to complement or match the colors of the surfaces to which they are attached.
8. Gutter and downspout locations shall be subject to CC&R guidelines and HOA approval.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 81 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Exterior finishes described above shall be constructed with the Project, enforced by the HOA according to recorded CC&Rs as shown on project plans, as verified by the City of Moreno Valley, prior to issuance of final tract map approval and issuance of permits. Incorporation of items a) through e above shall be incorporated in the recorded CC&Rs as verified by the City Planning Department, Building Official and Inspector prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy to enhance street-level views from streets and public open spaces.
SC AES-01: Visual Impacts- Prior to issuance of permits and final tract map approval, the City Engineer and Planning Division shall verify that Project plans and CC&Rs for the Project incorporate guidelines/regulations for the following:
e) Enforce the Municipal Code requirements and Design Guidelines to ensure that high quality development yielding a pleasant living environment for existing and future residents ( GP Objective 2- 10) f) New electrical and communication lines are to be placed underground (GP Policy 7.7.1) g) The size, number and design on signs shall be subject to city review and approval to minimize degradation of visual quality (GP Policy 7.7.2)
Minimize the visibility of wireless communication facilities by the public. Encourage “stealth” designs and encourage new antennas to be located on existing poles, buildings and other structures. Antennas are to be mounted in a manner not exceeding the heights of these structures. (GP Policy 7.7.5)
With the implementation of Mitigation Measures AES- 01, AES-02 and AES -03, Standard condition SC AES -01, and as a result of the discretionary approval and the standard measures and procedures of the City’s plan check and inspection processes, the Project would have a less than significant impact with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Response:
Less than Significant Impact. See Response I, a) through c). The Proposed Project will abide by standards of Title 24 of the California Building Code that addresses light pollution and glare hazards through establishing “maximum allowable backlight, up light, and glare (BUG) ratings” (MoVal 2021); therefore, significant impacts are not expected.
The Project will remain compliant with the City’s Municipal Code Sections listed below and requirements set forth by the City’s Public Works Department, the City Police Department, and Fire Department requiring the i nstallation of streetlights and appropriate lighting on exterior of houses for safety. The Project will install streetlights per the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated.
Additionally, to remain compliant with proper downlighting, light intensity, and maintenance for landscape buffers that are prescribed in the following Municipal Code Section, interior and exterior lighting is proposed according to the City’s Municipal Cod
e. The standard application of the City’s plan check and inspection processes for the Project’s implementation will result in less than significant impacts. Plan compliance with the following Municipal Code Sections will result in less than significant light and glare impacts from the Project:
Chapter 9.08.100 Lighting: contains general provisions for new construction on lighting wattage, security and parking requirements, and proper shielding so that light from the Project will not spill over the property lines.
C. Minimum Development and Performance Standards. All exterior lighting shall meet the following requirements:
1. Single-Family Residential Uses.
a. In all single-family residential areas, light should be shielded so that the lamp itself or the lamp image is not directly visible outside the property perimeter.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 82 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b. Maximum wattage for residential lighting shall be one hundred (100) watts incandescent or equivalent light intensity and twenty- six (26) watts compact fluorescent or equivalent light intensity, except for recreational courts.
Chapter 9.10.110 Light and Glare: Project-related direct and indirect lighting may not exceed 0.5 footcandles on adjacent property. All Project-related lighting shall be focused downward.
Chapter 9.10.120 Maintenance of open areas: Open areas are required to be maintained with landscaping and to be free of weeds.
Chapter 9.08.230 Landscaping requirements: Landscaping will be implemented to buffer land use proposed with the Project.
Chapter 9.17.080 Landscaping and Water Efficiency for Multifamily residential development:
Landscape buffers to be maintained.
Lighting proposed to be implemented at the Project Site is anticipated to be similar to what is allowable within the existing zoning for the Project Site. The standard application of the plan check and inspection processes are expected to result in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, the Project impacts are considered to be less than significant. In addition, the City’s process will prevent impacts from new sources of lighting from being cumulatively considerable. Consistency with City reg ulations for lighting for the Project and the other projects on Moreno Valley’s cumulative projects list within 1-mile of the proposed Project Site would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts beyond what has been reviewed and approved in the EIR for the General Plan Update. Therefore, no mitigation is required.
Sources:
1. Moreno Valley General Plan, adopted July 11, 2006
• Chapter 2 – Community Development Element – Section 2.3 – Community Design • Chapter 7 – Conservation Element – Section 7.8 – Scenic Resources - Figure 7-2 – Major Scenic Resources
2. Final Environmental Impact Report City of Moreno Valley General Plan, certified July 11, 2006 • Section 5.11 – Aesthetics
- Figure 5.11-1 – Major Scenic Resources
3. Title 9 – Planning and Zoning of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code • Section 9.10.110 – Light and Glare of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code. • Chapter 9.16 – Design Guidelines
• Section 9.17.030 G – Heritage Trees
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 83 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESCOURCES – In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Response:
Less than Significant Impact. As indicated by the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model, provided by the Department of Conservation, neither the Project Site nor the Local Vicinity is located on Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland). Farming does not take place at the Project Site and has not occurred on the premises since 1978 according to aerial site photos (NETRO 1978) (Reference https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer
).
The California Department of Conservation notes that the Project Site is on Farmland of Local Importance (https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/agriculture/). Within the City of Moreno Valley’s 2021 General Plan EIR, Farmland of Local Importance is defined as land “important to the local agricultural economy” and has been determined as such by the County’s Board of Supervisors and a local advisory committee. Within City Limits, approximately 8,399.8 acres of land is designated as Farmland of Local Importance, which includes the Project Site.
However, farmland under this designation is anticipated to be converted to alternative non-agricultural land uses under the implementation of the General Plan and General Plan Update. The City considers these pockets of vacant land to be underutilized resources within City Limits and according to the General Plan 2040 EIR, the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) “does not necessarily reflect local General Plan actions, urban needs, changing economic conditions, proximity to market, and other factors.” The City of Moreno Valley’s immediate needs include development of new housing and employment opportunities in the City with emphasis on intensifying floor/area ratios and residential densities within concept areas along arterial corridors, such as the mixed- use corridor planned along Perris Boulevard.
The intent of this approach is to preserve and enhance the quality of life in the existing developed areas of the City while accommodating regional growth pursuant to state legislation . The City’s pla ns in this regard emphasize development quality, more variety in housing choices economic vitality, increased walkability and overall balance between growth and environmental factors such as VMT, air quality, energy consumption, etc. Increasing housing development has been a priority due to local shortages and growing demands as well as the extent of need for new housing highlighted within future population growth projections, as outlined in the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) SCAG Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Growth Forecast (SCAG, April 2016) and the State of California Regional Housing Needs Allocation, which has been determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (used to create the City of Moreno Valley’s Housing Elements for 2008-2014 and 2021-2029). Moreno Valley’s General Plan Update describes Farmland as an interim land use within City Limits that is allowable in all zones and subject to conversion as indicated on the General Plan Land Use Map.
The Project implements policies and goals of the General Plan that pertain to increasing single- family housing within Moreno Valley and the Housing Element at the Project Site. The accommodation for the City’s housing needs will not result in the conversion of agricultural lands beyond what has already been considered and approved by the City’s General Plan, Housing Element, or SCAG Regional Plans pertaining to the Project Site and regional population projections and land use.
J.1.o
Packet Pg. 399
Attachment: Exhibit A: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration - Goya at Heritage Park [Revision 1] (6558 : HERITAGE PARK
Goya at Heritage Park Page 84 City of Moreno Valley
5.0 ISSUES & SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
According to the Department of Conservation, projects listed within Table 5: Moreno Valley Cumulative Projects List , are primarily located within areas designated as “urban and built -up land”. These projects are not located on Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland). Projects located on Farmland of Local Importance within pockets of vacant land are anticipated to be developed. Therefore, cumulatively considerable impacts from the buildout of projects listed within Table 5: Moreno Valley Cumulative Projects List, are not expected to convert Farmland that has not already been approved and considered for development under the City’s General Plan and EIR and the IS/MND for the Housing Element.