Agenda, regular meeting — Moreno Valley City Council, September 1, 2026 (part 2 of 20)

AGREEMENT FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA)

PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024-2028

THIS AGREEMENT FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024-2028 (Agreement) is made and entered into this ___ day of _______________, 2026, by and between THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, through its Housing, Homelessness Prevention and Workforce Solutions (“County” or “Administering Local Government”), and THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a California municipal corporation (“City” or “Delegating Local Government”). Together, County and City may hereafter be referred to individually as “Party,” or collectively as “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), as authorized by Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 50470, established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund (Fund) and the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program (“PLHA Program”) which was designed to provide a permanent source of funding to all local governments in California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the affordable housing stock.

B. HSC Section 50470 authorizes the HCD to allocate moneys collected and deposited in the Fund for the PLHA Program, with 90 percent of PLHA funds to local governments, and to adopt Guidelines to implement the PLHA Program.

C. The Parties are both Entitlement Local Governments that each separately received a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for fiscal year 2017 pursuant to the federal CDBG formula specified in 42 U.S.C. Section 5306.

D. Pursuant to Section 300(c) of the HCD Guidelines, a local government may delegate another local government to submit an application and administer the formula component of PLHA funds on its behalf, provided the local governments enter into an agreement and the funds are expended for eligible activities consistent with program requirements.

E. Consistent with HCD Guidelines, City desires to delegate to County the responsibility for submitting an application for administering its formula component for Allocation Years 2024-2028 (“City’s Allocations”) in the estimated funding amount of Four Million Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty dollars ($4,517,850).

F. The City fully supports the objectives, goals, strategies, programs and projects identified under the PLHA Formula Allocation 2026 Application that was proposed by the County for approval by the HCD (“Application”), and the City agrees to delegate its PLHA formula allocations to the County for the Application.

DRAFT
332

Page 3 of 10 ends

G. HCD requires this Agreement to set forth the agreed upon governance structure and terms of operation required to implement the PLHA program, including but not limited to, the expectations and responsibilities of the Parties, legal and financial terms, and community engagement and decision-making processes.

H. The Parties desire to enter into an Agreement as hereinafter set forth in order to establish a collaborative stakeholder structure for matters pertaining to the City’s Allocations.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Section 1. DEFINITIONS.

1.1 General. The definitions set forth in the above recitals, in the PLHA Guidelines, and otherwise indicated in parenthesis hereafter, shall apply to this Agreement.

1.2 PLHA. “PLHA” shall mean the Permanent Local Housing Allocation.

1.3 PLHA Guidelines. “PLHA Guidelines” shall mean the HCD 2026 PLHA Final Guidelines.

1.4 Application. “Application” shall mean the PLHA Formula Allocation 2026 Application for funding submitted by County.

1.5 Budget. “Budget” shall mean the budget for a particular housing development project.

1.6 Budget Report. “Budget Report” shall mean the report containing the budget for a particular Housing development project, which breaks down cost by task and lien item.

1.7 Close-Out Report. “Close-Out Report” shall mean the report submitted to the HCD at the conclusion of an individual Housing development project.

1.8 Term. “Term” shall mean the term of the PLHA Program Agreement.

1.9 Applicant. “Applicant” shall mean the County of Riverside.

1.10 Performance Period. “Performance Period” shall mean the period of time beginning immediately upon the completion of a Housing development project and ending upon a date determined by the County, during which City will be required to complete additional Indicator Tracking.

1.11 Subcontractor. “Subcontractor” shall mean any third party used by the Parties to perform any work in furtherance of a Housing development project.

1.12 PLHA Standard Agreement. “PLHA Standard Agreement” shall mean the agreement entered into by and between the County and the HCD.

DRAFT
333

Page 4 of 10 ends

1.13 Indicator Tracking. “Indicator Tracking” shall mean the ongoing monitoring and documentation of performance indicators required by HCD for PLHA-funded Housing development projects.

1.14 NOFA. “NOFA” shall mean the Notice of Funding Availability issued by HCD for the PLHA Program.

Section 2. INCORPORATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TERMS.

2.1 Incorporation. The Parties intend that this Agreement shall conform to and satisfy all requirements of the PLHA Guidelines and the PLHA Standard Agreement. The County’s performance shall be conducted in accordance with the PLHA Standard Agreement, the PLHA Guidelines, and this Agreement (hereafter collectively the “Performance Terms”).

2.2 Acknowledgement. Each Party acknowledges that it has reviewed the Performance Terms and the Application, and is fully committed to the goals and requirements of each.

Section 3. PURPOSE AND GOALS.

3.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to formalize the partnership and understanding between the Parties and to set forth the terms by which the Parties will manage, coordinate, and administer PLHA funding-related activities within the City’s boundaries, including the following:
a. Implementing activities, programs, strategies, and projects as set forth in the PLHA Standard Agreement;
b. Promoting the execution of objectives and goals set forth in the PLHA Standard Agreement;
c. Providing a platform for community engagement and input into implementation of activities related to PLHA funding; and
d. Performing such other functions as may be deemed necessary and appropriate to meet the objectives of this Agreement.

3.2 Goals. Each Party affirms that the PLHA program is designed to provide a permanent source of funding to all local governments in California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the affordable housing stock.

Section 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES.

DRAFT
334

Page 5 of 10 ends

4.1 Mutual Cooperation. The Parties recognize that they have complementary expertise and common goals and interests. The Parties shall endeavor to cooperate, work together, and share knowledge, expertise, and best practices with regards to the Application and shall commit to working collaboratively with one another and with community stakeholders throughout the Term.

The Parties hereto agree that they will each provide such information and documentation as is reasonably necessary to fulfill the intent of this Agreement and make diligent efforts to respond to inquiries and requests for information from the other Party. The Parties agree to provide all projectrelated information and documents as requested by the other Party, or the State of California, including all reporting-related documentation.

4.2 Leveraging of Available Funds. The Parties shall make good faith efforts, as appropriate, to leverage available federal, state, local, and private funds, and to assist the other Party in leveraging available federal, state, local, and private funds, to support development and construction of affordable housing.

4.3 Communication. The Parties shall commit to the principle of good communication, especially when one’s work may have some bearing on the responsibilities of the other. The Parties shall seek to alert each other as soon as practical to relevant developments with regards to the PLHA Program and its execution. The Parties shall also ensure that it is clear who the appropriate contacts are for particular matters and that contact details are kept up to date.

Section 5. COUNTY – ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

5.1 Applicant and Administering Local Government. County shall be the Applicant and Administering Local Government and shall execute the PLHA Standard Agreement, carry out all responsibilities as described in the Performance Terms, and work closely with HCD throughout the implementation of the Application. County commits to all duties and responsibilities corresponding to the Applicant’s role under the PLHA Plan for the length of the Term. County acknowledges that it:
a. Has reviewed the FY2026 PLHA Program NOFA, Final Guidelines, and related guidance from HCD;
b. Has participated in the preparation of the Application seeking funding for the following eligible activities:
i. §301(a)(1) – Rental Activities- The payment of predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation costs, necessary operating subsidies, or any combination thereof, for Multifamily Housing. ii. §301(a)(2) – Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing ActivitiesHomeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
c. Is fully committed to the goals and requirements of the NOFA, the Application, the funding requirements, and this Agreement.

DRAFT
335

Page 6 of 10 ends

d. County agrees to expend no less than the amount allocated to the Delegating Local Government in its respective jurisdiction, in accordance to PLHA Guidelines over the span of the Term of this Agreement. The City’s Allocations are anticipated to be in the funding amount of Four Million Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty dollars ($4,517,850).

5.2 Administration. County shall serve as the administrator of the City’s Allocations, including but not limited to, operating a down payment assistance program, promoting development of affordable housing inside the City, and annual reporting due to HCD. The County shall ensure compliance with all accounting, disbursement, recordkeeping, and all other compliance requirements with respect to the PLHA Standard Agreement.

5.3 Financial Support. County shall leverage as appropriate, or assist in leveraging, available federal, state, local, and private funds as available to support integrated strategic investment for the development of affordable housing developments in the City.

5.4 Oversight of Implementation. County shall supervise and coordinate the implementation of activities related to the PLHA Program, including development of affordable housing, down payment assistance program, long term compliance monitoring, and loan servicing of all PLHA loans.

5.5 Reporting. County shall be responsible for any and all required reports, including but not limited to Progress Reports, Indicator Reports, Budget Reports, and Close-Out Reports.

Section 6. TERM AND TERMINATION.

6.1 Term. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date on which the last Party executes this Agreement (“Effective Date”). The Term shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for five (5) years thereafter, unless terminated earlier or otherwise extended by a written amendment to this Agreement.

6.2 Termination – Convenience. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon two (2) years written notice served upon the other Party, stating the extent and effective date of termination.

6.3 Termination – For Cause. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice served upon the other Party, stating the extent and effective date of termination. For cause includes the following:
a. Default in which the alleged defaulting Party refuses or fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement or fails to make progress that may endanger performance and does not immediately cure such failure;

6.4 Termination – No Funding / Dishonesty or Material Breach. This Agreement shall automatically terminate if the Delegating Local Government is not allocated funding based on the DRAFT
336

Page 7 of 10 ends

Application. The Delegating Local Government’s rights under this Agreement shall also terminate upon dishonesty or a willful or material breach of this Agreement by the Delegating Local Government; or in the event of Delegating Local Government’s unwillingness or inability for any reason whatsoever to perform the terms of this Agreement.

6.5 The rights and remedies provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or this Agreement.

Section 7. INDEMNIFICATION.

7.1 City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives (individually and collectively hereinafter referred to as “County Indemnitees”) from any liability, action, claim or damage whatsoever, based or asserted upon any services of City, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kind or nature. City shall defend the County Indemnitees at its sole expense including all costs and fees (including, but not limited, to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards) in any claim or action based upon such acts, omissions or services.

7.2 With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by City, City shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of their own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of County; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes City indemnification to County Indemnitees as set forth herein.

7.3 City’s obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when City has provided to County the appropriate form of dismissal relieving County from any liability for the action or claim involved.

7.4 The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit or circumscribe City’s obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the County Indemnitees herein from third party claims.

Section 8. EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT.

8.1 Parties acknowledge and agree that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a covenant, promise, or commitment by the County to enter into any other agreement on any particular terms or conditions, in furtherance of any the Housing development projects in the Application if the Delegating Local Government is not selected for PLHA funding. The Delegating Local Government further understands and agrees that the State of California retains the ultimate discretion to approve or deny PLHA funding. Each Party’s execution of this Agreement is merely an agreement to the terms of the collaborative stakeholder structure, contingent upon PLHA Program funding and award.

DRAFT
337

Page 8 of 10 ends

8.2 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to require, or have the effect of requiring, the County to take any action inconsistent with any applicable law, rule or regulation which governs the County’s actions.

Section 9. NON-DISCRIMINATION.

The Parties shall not discriminate in the provision of services, allocation of benefits, accommodation in facilities, or employment of personnel on the basis of ethnic group identification, race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status or sex in the performance of this Agreement; and, to the extent they shall be found to be applicable hereto, shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code 12900 et. seq), the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. S1210 et seq.) and all other applicable laws or regulations.

Section 10. DISPUTES.

The Parties agree that before any Party commences any legal or equitable action, action for declaratory relief, suit, proceeding, or arbitration regarding this Agreement, that the Parties shall first submit the dispute to mediation through a mutually acceptable professional mediator in Riverside County. Each Party shall bear its own expenses and costs associated with the mediation.

Parties shall share the cost of a mediator equally.

Section 11. MISCELLANEOUS.

11.1 Notices. Any notices or reports relating to this Agreement, and any request, demand, statement or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing to the addresses set forth on the signature pages, and shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the day of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by confirmed facsimile during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid.

11.2 No Delegation or Assignment. City shall not delegate or assign any interest in this Agreement, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of County.

Any attempt to delegate or assign any interest herein shall be deemed void and of no force or effect.

11.3 Waivers. Any waiver by County of any breach of any one or more terms of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term of this Agreement. Failure on the part of County to require exact, full, and complete compliance with any terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms or preventing County from enforcement of the terms of this Agreement.

DRAFT
338

Page 9 of 10 ends

11.4 Conflict of Interest. No member, official or employee of the Parties shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested.

11.5 Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

11.6 Venue. Any legal action related to the performance or interpretation of this Agreement shall be filed only in the Superior Court in Riverside County, California, and the Parties waive any provision of law providing for a change of venue to another location. In the event any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

11.7 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties hereto and shall not create any rights in any third Parties. No other person or entity shall have any right of action based upon the provisions of this Agreement.

11.8 Section Headings. The Section headings herein are for the convenience of the Parties only and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement.

11.9 Compliance with Laws and Regulations; Legal Authority. By executing this Agreement, the Parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances. Nothing in this Agreement binds the Parties to perform any action that is beyond its legal authority.

11.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the Parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

11.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

11.12 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all exhibits and attachments hereto, is intended by the Parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. Any amendments to or clarification of this Agreement shall be in writing and acknowledged by all Parties to this Agreement. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
DRAFT
339

Page 10 of 10 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates set forth below.

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
a political subdivision of the State of
California, through the County of Riverside
Department of Housing and Workforce
Solutions
By:_____________________________
Heidi Marshall,
Director
Dated:__________________________
Address:

County of Riverside
Department of Housing and Workforce
Solutions
Attention: Juan Garcia, Deputy Director
3403 10th Street, Suite 300
Riverside, CA 92501
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MINH C. TRAN,
County Counsel
By:

Deputy County Counsel
THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a
California municipal corporation
By:_____________________________
Brian Mohan
City Manager
Dated:__________________________
Address:

City of Moreno Valley
Attn: City Manager
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Reginald Bickford
By:

Assistant City Attorney
DRAFT
Dated: 08/25/2026
340
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0320 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Felicia London, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer AGENDA DATE: September 1, 2026
TITLE: ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS INTO CFD NO.
2014-01 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) AND CFD NO.
2023-01 (PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES) (REPORT OF:

FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES)
(DISTRICTS: ALL APPLICABLE)
TITLE SUMMARY: Pursuant to Landowner Petitions, Annex Certain Parcels into Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance
Services) and Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) (Reso No. 2026-XX, Reso No.
2026-XX and Reso No. 2026-XX)
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services), adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services) and approving the amended map for said District, for the specific property as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City’s Election Official (Amendment Nos. 96 and 97); and

2. Acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services), adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to the City of Moreno 341
ID: 26-0320 Page 2
Valley Community Facilities District, for the specific properties as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City's Election Official (Amendment Nos. 166, 170, 172, 175, 183, 184, 186, 187, and 188).

SUMMARY
Adoption of the resolutions (Attachments 1-3) will order the annexation of a total of 17 parcels into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services) and Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) (the “Districts”).

This action impacts only the property owners identified below, not the general citizens or taxpayers of the City.

DISCUSSION
As conditions of approval for the development projects, Property Owners are required to provide an ongoing funding source for certain public services (i.e., public street lighting, street and drainage maintenance services, as well as public safety services). The funding mitigates the costs of impacts created by the proposed development.

On March 25, 2014, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, the City Council formed CFD No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services), and on November 21, 2023, they formed CFD No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) to provide alternative funding tools for the development community to mitigate the impact of their proposed development. Annexation into the Districts provides property owners with a mechanism to fund public street lighting, streets & drainage services, and public safety services, through an annual special tax.

On April 20, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 980, which designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for CFD 2014-01 and on March 5, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1007, which designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for CFD 2023-01. With the future annexation areas designated, annexations can occur without an additional public hearing as long as the annexing landowners provide unanimous consent.

A property owner has the following options to satisfy the development conditions requiring a funding source for certain public services:

1. Annex the territory into the applicable CFD(s). (This option is generally only available if there are fewer than 12 registered voters living within the proposed annexation area); or

2. Create a permanent, prefunded, and irrevocable endowment that will yield an annual revenue stream to meet the annual obligation and provide for the ongoing operational services.

CFD 2014-01 also offers the option of establishing a homeowner or property owner 342
ID: 26-0320 Page 3
association to provide the ongoing operation and maintenance of the improvements.

If a landowner elects to annex their property into the Districts and the City Council approves the annexation(s), the City is authorized to levy special taxes onto the annual property tax bill to fund the services related to or impacted by their development.

The following property owners have elected to annex into the Districts to satisfy their condition(s) of approval:

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

District Amendment
No(s). APN(s) Location
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0052/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
CFD 2014-01 96
482-304-037
482-304-038
482-304-039
482-304-040
482-304-041
482-304-042
482-304-043
482-304-044
482-304-045
North of Delphinium
Ave. and East of
Wilma Sue St.

WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0055/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
CFD 2014-01 97 297-100-008
East of Old 215
Frontage Rd.,
South of Alessandro,
North of Cactus
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0054/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
CFD 2023-01 166
482-304-037
482-304-038
482-304-039
482-304-040
482-304-041
482-304-042
482-304-043
482-304-044
482-304-045
North of Delphinium
Ave. and East of
Wilma Sue St.

WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0057/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
CFD 2023-01 170 297-100-008
East of Old 215
Frontage Rd.,
South of Alessandro,
North of Cactus
Andres Hernandez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0051/BFR25-0211
CFD 2023-01 172 296-091-004 13045 Running
Deer Rd.

Bautista Trust Dated 02/08/17
and Javier Bautista
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0063/BFR25-0210
CFD 2023-01 175 479-090-023 25072 Atwood Ave.

Marco Orozco
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0084/BFR26-0014
CFD 2023-01 183 486-083-006 25133 Fay Ave.
343
ID: 26-0320 Page 4
Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

District Amendment
No(s). APN(s) Location
Wright Sonia B Family
Trust DTD 8/22/2014
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0088/BFR26-0038
CFD 2023-01 184 487-111-020 12357 Sandria Ave.

Sarah Mae Zalipski
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0033/BFR25-0219
CFD 2023-01 186 484-293-033 14835 De Soto Pl.

Irineo Aguirre Miranda
and Guillermina Plata
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0082/BFR25-0222
CFD 2023-01 187 312-301-035 25323 Courtney Dr.

Diana L. Mokfi
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0095/BFR26-0081
CFD 2023-01 188 475-100-041 24044 Roseleaf Pl.

The Office of the Riverside County Registrar of Voters confirmed there were less than 12 registered voters residing at each property, allowing a special election of the landowner.

Adoption of the attached resolutions (Attachments 1-3) amends each District and adds the property/properties, with a special tax rate based on property type, in the Fiscal Impact section of this report and directs the recordation of the boundary maps and amended notices of special tax lien for the amendments. The City Clerk received and reviewed the Landowner Petitions and confirmed that the Property Owners unanimously approved the annexations of their property into the Districts (Attachment 4).

Successful completion of the annexation process satisfies the project’s conditions of approval requirements to provide a funding source for the operation and maintenance of public services, including street lighting, landscaping, streets and drainage, and public safety services.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt the resolutions. Staff recommends this alternative as it will annex the property/properties into CFD No. 2014-01 and CFD 2023-01 at the request of the Property Owners and satisfy the conditions of approval for the proposed developments.

2. Do not adopt the resolutions. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it is contrary to the request of the Property Owners, will not satisfy the conditions of approval and may delay development of the projects.

3. Do not adopt the resolutions but rather continue the item to a future regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the Property Owners from satisfying the conditions of 344
ID: 26-0320 Page 5
approval and may delay development of the projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenue received from the special taxes are restricted and can only be used to fund services within each District. The special tax can only be applied to a property tax bill of a parcel wherein the qualified electors (i.e., landowners or registered voters, depending upon the number of registered voters) have previously provided approval. The maximum special tax rate is detailed below. If the projected revenue from the maximum special tax exceeds what is necessary to fund the services, a lower amount will be applied to the property tax bill.

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

District Amendment
No(s).

Property
Type
FY 2026/27 Maximum
Special Tax Rate1
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0052/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
CFD 2014-01 96 Single
Family
SL-01A $359.68/parcel
SD-01 $1,165.78/parcel
$3.20/curb foot
WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0055/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
CFD 2014-01 97 Commercial SL-02
$5.84/
Proportional
Front Foot
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0054/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
CFD 2023-01 166 Single
Family $266.81/Unit
WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0057/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
CFD 2023-01 170 Commercial $61.74/1,000 Feet of Building Square Footage
Andres Hernandez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0051/BFR25-0211
CFD 2023-01 172
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
Bautista Trust Dated 02/08/17
and Javier Bautista
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0063/BFR25-0210
CFD 2023-01 175
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
Marco Orozco
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
SCP26-0084/BFR26-0014
CFD 2023-01 183
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
345
ID: 26-0320 Page 6
Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

District Amendment
No(s).

Property
Type
FY 2026/27 Maximum
Special Tax Rate1
Wright Sonia B Family
Trust DTD 8/22/2014
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0088/BFR26-0038
CFD 2023-01 184
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
Sarah Mae Zalipski
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0033/BFR25-0219
CFD 2023-01 186
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
Irineo Aguirre Miranda
and Guillermina Plata
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0082/BFR25-0222
CFD 2023-01 187
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
Diana L. Mokfi
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0095/BFR26-0081
CFD 2023-01 188
Accessory
Dwelling
Unit
$227.12/Unit
1The special tax applied to the property tax bill will be based on the needs of the District. The applied special tax rate cannot exceed the maximum special tax rate.

The applied Special Tax Rate for Street Lighting for Single Family Residential, Perimeter and Interior Street Lighting (SL01A) is $31.50/parcel; the Applied Special Tax Rate for Street Maintenance and Drainage (SD-01) is $800/parcel and $0/per curb foot; and the applied Special Tax Rate for Street Lighting for Property Other than Single Family Residential (SL-02) is $2.50/proportional front foot.

The maximum special tax rates are subject to an annual inflation adjustment based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or five percent (5%), whichever is greater.

However, the annual adjustment cannot be applied unless the City Council annually authorizes such adjustment. The increase to the maximum special tax rates cannot exceed the annual inflationary adjustment without a two-thirds approval of the qualified electors.

NOTIFICATION
The Landowner Petitions were provided to the Property Owners on August 12, 2026.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Department Head Approval:

Aasiyah DeAndrade Felicia London
Management Assistant Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer Concurred by: Concurred by:

Valerie Arenas Rey Mayra Gonzalez
Special Districts Division Manager Public Safety Contracts Administrator Concurred by:

Patty Yhuit
346
ID: 26-0320 Page 7
Deputy Finance Director (Operations)

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness: Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

Revenue Diversification and Preservation: Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 2.5: Develop partnerships with local businesses and warehouse operators to reduce traffic related issues.

Objective 2.6: Enhance operational excellence and efficiency in delivery of Police services.

Objective 2.7: Fully integrate Fire Prevention activities into the City’s Development Services processes to provide swift, seamless service.

Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.
347
ID: 26-0320 Page 8
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_FMS_SD_ANNEXATIONS INTO CFD 2014- 01_AND_CFD 2023-01_09.01.26.docx
Attachments: - RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATIONS_CFD 2014-01 AM

96.docx
- RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATIONS_CFD 2014-01 AM

97.docx
- RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION_CFD 2023-01.docx
- CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION OFFICIAL_CFD 2014-01 AND
CFD 2023-01.docx
Final Approval
Date:

Aug 26, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

No Signature found
Valerie Arenas Rey
No Signature found
Mayra Gonzalez
No Signature found
Patty Yhuit
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
348
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-01
(MAINTENANCE SERVICES) AND APPROVING THE

AMENDED MAP FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 2014-25, the City Council established the City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services) (the “CFD”), a citywide district, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 874, the City Council authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund street lighting services and landscape maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 980, the City Council authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD to fund Drainage and Street Maintenance Services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the City Council, by its Ordinance No. 980 designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the CFD and approved the third amended and restated rate and method of apportionment for the Special Tax; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcels listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, has submitted to the City a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcels (the “Annexation Parcels”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcels are comprised of the territory shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) “Amendment No. 96 to Boundaries of City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services), City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution, and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to annex the Annexation Parcels to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct and are herein incorporated.

2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcels are hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect. The Annexation Parcels are subject to the Special Tax 349
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
associated with the Tax Rate Areas indicated on Exhibit A to this Resolution.

3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of all services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:

A. Landscape Maintenance Services: Maintaining, servicing, and operating landscape improvements and associated appurtenances located within the public rightof-way and within dedicated landscape easements for the CFD. These improvements may include but are not limited to parkways, medians, open space landscaping, fencing, monuments, ornamental lighting, drainage, turf, ground cover, shrubs, vines and trees, irrigation systems, and appurtenant facilities and structures. Fundable costs may include, but are not limited to: (i) contracting costs for landscape maintenance services, including litter removal, (ii) salaries and benefits of City staff, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) City administrative and overhead costs associated with providing such services within the CFD, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities.

B. Street Lighting Services: Maintaining, servicing, and operating street lights and appurtenant improvements. Fundable costs may include, but are not limited to: (i) contracting costs for street light maintenance, (ii) salaries and benefits of City staff, if the City directly provides street light maintenance services, (iii) utility expenses and the expense related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services and authorized by the Act, (iv) City administrative and overhead costs associated with providing such services for the CFD, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities.

C. Drainage and Street Maintenance Services: Maintaining, servicing, and operating drainage improvements and maintaining streets. Drainage improvements include public improvements and appurtenance (and associated easements) that are designed or used to capture, retain, detain, remove, transport, or treat surface water and storm water runoff. Fundable costs may include, but are not limited to: (i) contracting costs for street and drainage maintenance services, including litter removal, (ii) salaries and benefits of City staff if the City directly provides these services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) City administrative and overhead costs associated with providing such services within the CFD, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of streets and drainage improvements.

The Annexation Parcels will only be provided with the services indicated on Exhibit A.

4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The City Council directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.

5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The City Council directs that an amended notice of 350
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcels associated with the Boundary Map.

6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain on file as a public record this Resolution.

8. Severability. That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

9. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of September 2026.
____________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
City Attorney

RESOLUTION JURAT
351
4 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2026-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of September 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
352
5 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT A
Boundary Map
Amendment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Numbers Services
Tax Rate Area
& Maintenance
Category
482-304-037
through -045
(9 parcels total)
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Based on current development plans, it is anticipated that the Annexation Group will be in the Maintenance Category listed above; however all taxes will be calculated as set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

The parcels associated with a given development constitute a separate Annexation Group for purpose of calculating the applicable Maintenance Category (where applicable) for each Tax Rate Area. The anticipated Maintenance Category (where applicable) is shown in parenthesis following the Tax Rate Area. All capitalized terms in this paragraph have the meanings set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

Street Lighting SL-01A
Amendment No. 96
Street Maintenance and
Drainage SD-01
353
6 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
354
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-01
(MAINTENANCE SERVICES) AND APPROVING THE

AMENDED MAP FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 2014-25, the City Council established the City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services) (the “CFD”), a citywide district, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 874, the City Council authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund street lighting services and landscape maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 980, the City Council authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD to fund Drainage and Street Maintenance Services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the City Council, by its Ordinance No. 980 designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the CFD and approved the third amended and restated rate and method of apportionment for the Special Tax; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, has submitted to the City a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcels”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territory shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) “Amendment No. 97 to Boundaries of City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services), City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution, and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct and are herein incorporated.

2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect. The Annexation Parcel is subject to the Special Tax 355
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
associated with the Tax Rate Areas indicated on Exhibit A to this Resolution.

3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of all services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:

The Annexation Parcel will only be provided with the services indicated on Exhibit A.

5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The City Council directs that an amended notice of 356
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcels associated with the Boundary Map.

6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain on file as a public record this Resolution.

9. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

RESOLUTION JURAT
357
4 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
358
5 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT A
Boundary Map
Amendment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Numbers Services
Tax Rate Area
& Maintenance
Category
297-100-008
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Based on current development plans, it is anticipated that the Annexation Group will be in the Maintenance Category listed above; however all taxes will be calculated as set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

Amendment No. 97 Street Lighting SL-02
359
6 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
360
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-01
(PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES) AND APPROVING

AMENDED MAPS FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 2023-82, the City Council established the City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services) (the “CFD”), a citywide district, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 1004, the City Council authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund public safety services; and WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the City Council, by its Ordinance No. 1007 designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the CFD and approved the rate and method of apportionment for the Special Tax; and
WHEREAS, the landowners of the parcels listed in Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, has submitted to the City a petition requesting and approving annexation to the CFD of said parcels; and WHEREAS, territory proposed for annexation to the CFD Parcels are shown on the boundary maps titled “Amendment Nos. 166, 170, 172, 175, 183, 184, and 186-188 to Boundaries of City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-01 (Public Safety Services), City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California” (the “Boundary Maps”), which are attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to annex the territory shown on the Boundary Maps (the Annexation Parcels) to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct and are herein incorporated.

2. Annexations Approved. The Annexation Parcels are hereby added to and made part of the CFD with full legal effect. The Annexation Parcels are subject to the Special Tax as indicated on Exhibit A to this Resolution.

3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of all services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:
361
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
Police protection services; fire protection and suppression services; and paramedic services, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2023-01 is created and do not supplant existing services.

Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) direct costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff providing such services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements used to provide such services. Fundable costs also include the incidental expenses of the administration of CFD No. 2023-01.

4. Amended Boundary Maps. The Boundary Maps are hereby approved. These maps amend, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The City Council directs that said maps be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.

5. Notices of Special Tax Lien. The City Council directs that amended notices of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcels associated with the Boundary Maps.

6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall maintain on file as a public record this Resolution.

9. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
362
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of September 2026.
____________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
City Attorney
363
4 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
364
5 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcels
Boundary Map
Amendment
No.

Assessor's Parcel
Numbers
FY 2026/27
Maximum
Special Tax Rate1
166
482-304-037
482-304-038
482-304-039
482-304-040
482-304-041
482-304-042
482-304-043
482-304-044
482-304-045
Single Family
Residential Unit(s) $266.81/Unit
170 297-100-008 Commercial $61.74/1,000 Feet of
Building Square Footage
172 296-091-004 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
175 479-090-023 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
183 486-083-006 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
184 487-111-020 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
186 484-293-033 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
187 312-301-035 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
188 475-100-041 Accessory Dwelling Unit $227.12/Unit
1Based on current development plans, it is anticipated that the Annexation Group will be in the Land Use Category listed above; however, all taxes will be calculated as set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.
365
6 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
366
7 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendments
367
8 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
368
9 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
369
10 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
370
11 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
371
12 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
372
13 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
373
14 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
374
15 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
375
ATTACHMENT 2

CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION OFFICIAL
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0319 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Felicia London, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer AGENDA DATE: September 1, 2026
TITLE: ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS INTO CFD NO.
2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) (REPORT OF:

FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES)
(DISTRICTS: ALL DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Pursuant to Landowner Petitions, Annex Certain Parcels into Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks
Maintenance) (Reso No. CSD 2026-XX)
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the CSD:

1. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX, a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, ordering the annexation of territory to Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended maps for said District, for the specific properties as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City’s Election Official (Amendment Nos. 341, 344, 346, 348, 357, 358, 360, 361, and 362).

SUMMARY
Adoption of this resolution (Attachment 1) will certify the annexation of 17 parcels into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) (“District”). This 387
ID: 26-0319 Page 2
action impacts only the property owners identified below, not the general citizens or taxpayers of the City.

DISCUSSION
As a condition of approval for development projects, the property owners are required to provide an ongoing funding source for maintenance of certain public facilities (i.e., parks).

The funding mitigates the cost of the impacts created by the proposed development.

On June 1, 2021, the CSD Board formed CFD No. 2021-01, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. The District was created to provide the development community with an alternative funding tool to mitigate the impacts of their proposed development. If a property owner elects to annex the parcels of their development into the District, they also authorize the CSD annually levy a special tax, collected on the annual property tax bill, against property in the development project. Thus, satisfying the condition of approval.

On December 21, 2021, the CSD Board adopted Ordinance No. 56, which designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the District. With the future annexation area designated, annexations can occur without an additional public hearing as long as the annexing landowner provides unanimous consent. Once annexed, parcels are subject to the annual special tax to fund the service they are receiving.

An applicant has two options to satisfy the condition(s) of approval:

1. The property owner submits a Landowner Petition unanimously approving annexation of the property into the District. Approval of the petition and special tax rate allows the City to annually levy the special tax on the property tax bill of the property. This option is only available if there are fewer than 12 registered voters living within the proposed annexation area; or

2. The applicant funds an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation and provides for the ongoing operation and maintenance of park facilities.

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

Amendment
No(s).

APN(s) Location
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0053/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
341
482-304-037
482-304-038
482-304-039
482-304-040
482-304-041
482-304-042
482-304-043
482-304-044
482-304-045
North of Delphinium Ave. and
East of Wilma Sue St.
388
ID: 26-0319 Page 3
Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

Amendment
No(s).

APN(s) Location
WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0056/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
344 297-100-008
East of Old 215 Frontage Rd.,
South of Alessandro Blvd.,
North of Cactus Ave.

Andres Hernandez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0050/BFR25-0211
346 296-091-004 13045 Running Deer Rd.

Bautista Trust Dated 02/08/17
and Javier Bautista
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0062/BFR25-0210
348 479-090-023 25072 Atwood Ave.

Marco Orozco
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
SCP26-0083/BFR26-0014
357 486-083-006 25133 Fay Ave.

Wright Sonia B Family
Trust DTD 8/22/2014
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0087/BFR26-0038
358 487-111-020 12357 Sandria Ave.

Sarah Mae Zalipski
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0032/BFR25-0219
360 484-293-033 14835 De Soto Pl.

Irineo Aguirre Miranda
and Guillermina Plata
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0081/BFR25-0222
361 312-301-035 25323 Courtney Dr.

Diana L. Mokfi
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0094/BFR26-0081
362 475-100-041 24044 Roseleaf Pl.

The Property Owners listed above elected to annex their property into CFD No. 2021-01 and have the special tax applied to their annual property tax bill. The office of the Riverside County Registrar of Voters confirmed the number of registered voters residing at each property, allowing a special election of the landowner. Adoption of the resolution (Attachment 1) amends the District and adds the property to the tax rate area identified in the Fiscal Impact section of this report. The resolution also directs the recordation of the boundary maps (included within the resolution) and amended notice of special tax liens for the amendments. The Election Official confirmed the Property Owners unanimously approved the annexation of their property into the District (Attachment 2).

ALTERNATIVES
389
ID: 26-0319 Page 4

1. Adopt the resolution. Staff recommends this alternative since it will annex the properties into CFD No. 2021-01 at the request of the Property Owners and satisfy the condition of approval for the proposed developments.

2. Do not adopt the resolution. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it is contrary to the request of the Property Owners, will not satisfy the condition of approval, and may delay development of the projects.

3. Do not adopt the resolution but rather continue the item to a future regular scheduled City Council meeting. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the Property Owners from satisfying the condition of approval and may delay development of the projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenue received from the special tax is restricted and can only be used to fund the services for each tax rate area within the District. The special tax can only be applied to a property tax bill of a parcel wherein the qualified electors (i.e., landowners or registered voters, depending upon the number of registered voters) have previously provided approval. If the projected revenue from the maximum special tax exceeds what is necessary to fund the services within the tax rate area, a lower amount will be applied to the property tax bill for all of the properties within the affected tax rate area. The maximum special tax rates are detailed below.

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

Amendment
No(s).

Property Type FY 2026/27
Maximum Special Tax Rate1
Amro Ahmed, He Youlan, and
1926 83rd Realty Corp.

TR 32711, 9 Single-Family Homes
SCP26-0053/PEN23-0085/BFT23-0228
341 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
WIP/WCSS - Moreno Valley LLC
Self Storage Facility
SCP26-0056/PEN24-0091/BFC25-0163
344 Commercial $24.87/1,000 Feet of
Building Square Footage
Andres Hernandez
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0050/BFR25-0211
346 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
Bautista Trust Dated 02/08/17
and Javier Bautista
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0062/BFR25-0210
348 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
Marco Orozco
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0083/BFR26-0014
357 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
390
ID: 26-0319 Page 5
Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record No(s).

Amendment
No(s).

Property Type FY 2026/27
Maximum Special Tax Rate1
Wright Sonia B Family
Trust DTD 8/22/2014
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0087/BFR26-0038
358 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
Sarah Mae Zalipski
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0032/BFR25-0219
360 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
Irineo Aguirre Miranda
and Guillermina Plata
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0081/BFR25-0222
361 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
Diana L. Mokfi
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
SCP26-0094/BFR26-0081
362 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
1The special tax applied to the property tax bill will be based on the needs of the District. The applied special tax rate cannot exceed the maximum special tax rate.

The maximum special tax rate is subject to an annual inflation adjustment based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or five percent (5%), whichever is greater.

However, the annual adjustment cannot be applied unless the CSD Board annually authorizes such adjustment. The increase to the maximum special tax rate cannot exceed the annual inflationary adjustment without a two-thirds approval of the qualified electors within the affected tax rate area.

NOTIFICATION
The Landowner Petitions were provided to the Property Owners on August 12, 2026.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Aasiyah DeAndrade Felicia London
Management Assistant Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer Concurred By: Concurred By:

Valerie Arenas Rey Jeremy Bubnick
Special Districts Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred by:

Patty Yhuit
Deputy Finance Director (Operations)
391
ID: 26-0319 Page 6

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape, and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.
392
ID: 26-0319 Page 7
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_FMS_SD_ANNEXATIONS INTO CFD 2021- 01_09.01.26.docx
Attachments: - RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION_CFD 2021- 01_09.01.26.docx
- CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION OFFICIAL_CFD 2021-01.docx
Final Approval
Date:

Aug 26, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

No Signature found
Valerie Arenas Rey
No Signature found
Jeremy Bubnick
No Signature found
Patty Yhuit
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
393
1 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2026-XX

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF

THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS

MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AMENDED MAPS FOR

SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowners of the Parcels listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, have submitted to the District (a) petitions requesting and approving annexation of the listed “Annexation Parcels” to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcels are comprised of the territory shown on the boundary maps (the “Boundary Maps”) entitled “Amendment Numbers: 341, 344, 346, 348, 357, 358, 360, 361, and 362 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2021- 01 (Parks Maintenance), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California” which are set forth in Exhibit B to this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcels to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct and are herein incorporated.

2. Annexations Approved. The Annexation Parcels are hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and are subject to the Special Tax.

3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services 394
2 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
(the “Services”) provided in the CFD:

Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.

Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.

Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to such services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.

4. Amended Boundary Maps. The Boundary Maps attached hereto as Exhibit B are hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said maps be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.

5. Notices of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcels associated with the Boundary Maps.

6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.

8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
395
3 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of September 2026.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
396
4 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 1st day of September 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________

SECRETARY
(SEAL)
397
5 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcels
Boundary Map
Amendment No.

Assessor's Parcel
Numbers
FY 2026/27
Maximum
Special Tax Rate1
341
482-304-037
482-304-038
482-304-039
482-304-040
482-304-041
482-304-042
482-304-043
482-304-044
482-304-045
Single-Family $388.05/Unit
344 297-100-008 Commercial $24.87/1,000 Feet of
Building Square Footage
346 296-091-004 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
348 479-090-023 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
357 486-083-006 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
358 487-111-020 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
360 484-293-033 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
361 312-301-035 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
362 475-100-041 Single-Family $388.05/Unit
1Based on current development plans, it is anticipated that the Annexation Group will be in the Land Use Category listed above; however, all taxes will be calculated as set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.
398
6 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendments
399
7 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
400
8 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
401
9 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
402
10 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
403
11 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
404
12 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
405
13 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
406
14 Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
407
ATTACHMENT 2

CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION OFFICIAL
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0328 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: September 1, 2026
TITLE: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO

YAMADA ENTERPRISES FOR LIBRARY

FURNISHINGS FOR THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE
BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT 803 0066 (REPORT OF:

PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 2)
TITLE SUMMARY: Authorization to Award a Contract to Yamada Enterprises for Library Furnishings for the Lakeshore Village Branch Library (Project No. 803 0066)
DISTRICT: District 2
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and CSD:

1. Approve the Agreement between the City of Moreno Valley and Yamada Enterprises in the amount of $225,000 to provide furniture, shelving, and related items necessary to outfit the Lakeshore Village Branch Library, Project No. 803 0066; and

2. Authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order to Yamada Enterprises in an amount not to exceed $225,000, necessary for the outfit of the Library when the contract has been signed by all parties; and
417
ID: 26-0328 Page 2

3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, the authority to execute any subsequent amendments to the Agreement with Yamada Enterprises, including authorizing associated Purchase Orders and Change Orders in accordance with the Agreement's terms, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and within the budgetary amounts previously approved by the City Council as part of the adopted and/or amended budget process; and

4. Approve budget adjustments as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council approve the Agreement with Yamada Enterprises pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code 3.12.260, which allows the City to utilize competitively awarded government contracts, commonly referred to as “piggybacking,” without further contracting, solicitation, or formal bidding to buy goods or services, if it benefits the city and follows State law.

The City will utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) Cooperative Agreement No. 4-24-08-1008 to procure the required library furnishings from Yamada Enterprises for the Lakeshore Village Branch Library Project No. 803 0066. Utilizing the CMAS agreement provides the City with an established, competitively awarded procurement vehicle for purchasing the required furnishings in accordance with applicable State law and City purchasing requirements.

DISCUSSION
The City is completing the development of the new Lakeshore Village Branch Library, the third satellite branch Library in the City’s history. As part of the project, the facility must be furnished and equipped with appropriate shelving, furniture, and related items necessary to support library operations and provide a functional, welcoming environment for library patrons and staff. Library furniture has lead times of three to four months.

Therefore, it is important that the City proceed with the procurement of the furniture in a timely manner to support the project schedule.

Yamada Enterprises was previously utilized to furnish the City’s Iris Plaza Library.

Continuing with Yamada will maintain consistency in design, quality, functionality, and appearance across the City’s library facilities. Standardized shelving and furnishings also ensure component compatibility and support future maintenance, replacement, and expansion.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report.

Staff recommend this alternative.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. Staff does not recommend this alternative.
418
ID: 26-0328 Page 3

FISCAL IMPACT
The Lakeshore Library Project will be fully funded with Library Development Impact Fee (DIF) Funds (2908). The $175,000 budget adjustment will fund the purchase of furniture, shelving, and related furnishings for the branch. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Description Fund GL Account No. Type
(Rev/Exp)
FY 26/27
Budget
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 26/27
Amended
Budget
Library DIF
(Transfer out)
2908 2908-99-95-92908-903000 Exp 0 $225,000 $225,000
Facilities
Construction
(Transfer in)
3000 3000-99-99-93000-802908 Rev 0 $225,000 $225,000
CIP 3000 3000-50-56-80003-720199
Project: 803 0066-3000-99
Exp $2,071,160 $225,000 $2,246,160

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Admin. & Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects: Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
419
ID: 26
-0328 Page 4
420
ID: 26-0328 Page 5
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_PARKS_YAMADAENTERPRISES.docx Attachments: - Yamada Enterprises Agreement.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Aug 26, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
421
Version: 08/10/2026
City of Moreno Valley

AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND SALE OF GOODS This Agreement is made by and between the Moreno Valley Community Services District, California, a municipal corporation, with its principal place of business at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92552, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and J.K. MIKLIN, INC. DBA YAMADA ENTERPRISES, a CORPORATION, with its principal place of business at 16552 Burke Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647, hereinafter referred to as the “Vendor,” based upon City policies and the following legal citations:

RECITALS
A. Government Code Section 53060 authorizes the engagement of persons to perform special services as independent Vendors;
B. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the cooperative/piggyback purchasing provisions under Moreno Valley Municipal Code section 3.12.260; the City is utilizing the contract originally awarded by The California Multiple Award Schedule (hereinafter “CMAS”) ("Agency") to J.K. MIKLIN, INC. DBA YAMADA ENTERPRISES on August 6, 2024, under Agreement No. 4-24-08-1008 ("Agency Agreement"), for the procurement of goods and services;
C. Vendor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional FURNITURE, FURNISHINGS AND SERVICES contracting services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Vendor represents that it is experienced in providing professional FURNITURE, FURNISHINGS AND SERVICES contracting services and is licensed in the State of California, if applicable; D. City desires to engage Vendor to render such services for the LAKESHORE LIBRARY BRANCH FURNITURE, FURNISHINGS AND SERVICES as set forth in this Agreement; E. The public interest, convenience, necessity, and general welfare will be served by this Agreement; and
F. This Agreement is made and entered into effective the date the City signs this Agreement.

TERMS

1. VENDOR INFORMATION:

Vendor’s Name: J.K. Miklin, Inc. dba Yamada Enterprises Address: 16552 Burke Lane
City: Huntington Beach State: CA Zip: 92647
422
Version: 08/10/2026
Business Phone: 714-843-9882
Business License Number: _________________________
Federal Tax I.D. Number: _________________________

2. VENDOR SERVICES, FEES, AND RELEVANT DATES:

A. The Vendor’s scope of service is described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

B. The City’s responsibilities, other than payment, are described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

C. Payment terms are provided in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

D. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date the City signs the agreement to June 30, 2027 unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The City acknowledges that it will not unreasonably withhold approval of the Vendor’s requests for extensions of time in which to complete the work required. The Vendor shall not be responsible for performance delays caused by others or delays beyond the Vendor’s reasonable control (excluding delays caused by nonperformance or unjustified delay by Vendor, his/her/its employees, or subcontractors), and such delays shall extend the time for performance of the work by the Vendor.

E. Future Purchases and Purchase Orders.
a. Future Purchases: The City may purchase additional goods from the Vendor based on future quotes provided by the Vendor. Such purchases will be governed by the terms of this Agreement unless both parties agree otherwise in writing
b. Purchase Orders: Future quotes, once accepted by the City, will serve as purchase orders and become binding under this Agreement. These purchase orders will outline the agreed pricing, descriptions, quantities, delivery requirements, and any special terms related to the goods being purchased.
c. Governance of Terms: In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms specified in the purchase order, the terms of this Agreement shall govern, except where the purchase order provides additional detail or specificity not addressed herein.

F. Termination Rights. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in any appended documents, the City’s right to terminate this Agreement for cause or 423
Version: 08/10/2026
convenience, as specified in this Agreement and Exhibit C, shall prevail over any conflicting termination or refund provisions.

3. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

A. Control of Work. Vendor is solely responsible for the content and sequence of the work and will not be subject to control and direction as to the details and means for accomplishing the anticipated results of services. The City will not provide any training to Vendor or his/her/its employees.

B. Intent of Parties. Vendor is, and at all times shall be, an independent Vendor and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Vendor or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the Vendor, an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing the Vendor to create or assume any obligation or liability for or on behalf of the City, or entitling the Vendor to any right, benefit, or privilege applicable to any officer or employee of the City.

C. Subcontracting. Vendor may retain or subcontract for the services of other necessary Vendors with the prior written approval of the City. Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of the Vendor. Any and all subcontractors shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, with the exception that the City shall have no obligation to pay for any subcontractor services rendered.

Vendor shall be responsible for paying prevailing wages where required by law [See California Labor Code Sections 1770 through 1777.7].

D. Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Vendor shall be subject to the approval of City.

E. Substitution of Key Personnel. Vendor has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Vendor may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Vendor cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the project by the Vendor at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: PARKER BRAVERMAN.
424
Version: 08/10/2026
F. City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). Vendor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

G. Vendor’s Representative. Vendor hereby designates Parker Braverman, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Vendor’s Representative”). Vendor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Vendor for all purposes under this Agreement.

The Vendor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the services under this Agreement.

H. Legal Considerations. The Vendor shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws in the performance of this Agreement. Vendor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with services. If the Vendor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Vendor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

I. Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Vendor shall perform all services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Vendor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the profession necessary to perform the services. Vendor warrants that all employees and subcontractor shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the services assigned to them. Finally, Vendor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Any employee of the Vendor or its subcontractors who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the project by the Vendor and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the services or to work on the project.

J. Vendor Indemnification. Vendor shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all 425
Version: 08/10/2026
claims, damages, losses, causes of action and demands, including, without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees, reasonable attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses, incurred in connection with or in any manner arising out of Vendor’s performance of the work contemplated by this Agreement and this Agreement. Acceptance of this Agreement signifies that the Vendor is not covered under the City’s general liability insurance, employee benefits, or worker’s compensation. It further establishes that the Vendor shall be fully responsible for such coverage. Vendor’s obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the CSD, and their officers, agents and employees.

K. Additional Indemnity Obligations. Vendor shall defend, with counsel of City’s choosing and at Vendor’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all claims, suits, actions or other proceedings of every kind covered by Section “J” that may be brought or instituted against City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the CSD, and their officers, agents and employees. Vendor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the CSD, and their officers, agents and employees as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Vendor shall also reimburse City for the cost of any settlement paid by City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the CSD, and their officers, agents and employees as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for City’s attorney’s fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Vendor shall reimburse City, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the CSD, and their officers, agents and employees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.

L. CalPERS Retiree Disclosure. Vendor hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for Vendor who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by Vendor to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.

M. CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, Vendor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City 426
Version: 08/10/2026
for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.

N. CalPERS Participation. As set forth in this Agreement and in the Request for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of Vendor as an independent Vendor of City and agents and employees of Vendor, and not as agents or employees of City. Vendor and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan (“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.

O. Civil Code Section 1542 Waiver. Vendor expressly waives any and all rights and benefits conferred upon it by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which reads as follows:
“A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.”
This waiver shall be effective as a bar to any and all actions, fees, damages, losses, claims, liabilities and demands of whatsoever character, nature and kind that are known or unknown, or suspected or unsuspected, including, without limitation, claims of entitlements under CalPERS that are only afforded to employees and not independent contractors. Vendor further represents and warrants that it understands this waiver and that if it does not understand this waiver, it shall seek the advice of a qualified attorney before executing this Agreement.

P. Joint Cooperation. In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agreement to City are City’s employees, Vendor shall reply within five days and share all communications and documents from CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either Vendor or City files an appeal or court challenge, Vendor and City each agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.

Q. Insurance Requirements. Throughout the life of this Agreement, Vendors shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all insurance as required.

If at any time during the life of this Agreement or any extension, Vendor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all services and work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and 427
Version: 08/10/2026
all payments due or that become due to Vendor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City pursuant to this section shall in any way relieve Vendor of its responsibilities under this Agreement. The phrase "fail to maintain any required insurance" shall include, without limitation, notification received by City that an insurer has commenced proceedings, or has had proceedings commenced against it, indicating that the insurer is insolvent.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Vendor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Vendor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable.

The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Vendor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Vendor, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Vendor, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

Upon request of City, Vendor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy and associated documentation required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Where determined applicable by the City, Vendor will comply with the following insurance requirements at its sole expense. Insurance companies shall be rated (A Minus: VII-Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct business in the State of California.

Minimum Scope of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. The most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 covering on an “occurrence” basis, which shall include insurance for "bodily injury," "property damage" and "personal and advertising injury" with coverage for premises and operations, products and completed operations, and contractual liability.

2. The most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, which shall include coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1- Any Auto). 428
Version: 08/10/2026

3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, California Labor Code and Employer's Liability Insurance, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to Vendor’s profession.

Minimum Limits of Insurance:
a. General Liability Insurance. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury, including death, and/or property damage suffered or alleged to be suffered by any person or persons whomever, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or activities of the Vendor, subcontractor, or any person acting for the Vendor or under its control or direction. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect throughout the terms of this Agreement and any extension thereof in the minimum amounts provided below:
• $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage • $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury • $2,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations • $2,000,000 general aggregate
b. Automobile Liability
• $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage c. Employer's Liability (Worker's Compensation)
• $1,000,000 each accident for bodily injury
• $1,000,000 disease each employee
• $1,000,000 disease policy limit
d. Workers' Compensation insurance policy: In such amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Vendor and the City, HA, and CSD against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases happening to any worker employed by the Vendor in the course of carrying out this Agreement. Workers' Compensation insurance policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provision: Vendor and its insurer shall waive any right of subrogation against City of Moreno Valley, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. 429
Version: 08/10/2026
e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
f. Endorsements. Unless otherwise specified hereunder, each insurance policy required herein shall be with insurers possessing a Best’s rating of no less than A,VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
• The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its appointed officials, officers, employees or agents.

Other Insurance Provisions: The General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers Compensation insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. City of Moreno Valley, the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds. b. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

All polices of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Vendor shall furnish the City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for the City, Vendor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

Acceptability of Insurers: All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be placed with an insurance company(ies) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "AVII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide; or authorized by the City Manager or designee.

Verification of Coverage: Vendor shall furnish City with all certificates(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City Manager or designee prior to City’s execution of this Agreement and before work commences. The following applicable endorsements will be required:
430
Version: 08/10/2026

1. Additional Insured endorsement for ongoing operations, completed operations and primary & non-contributory endorsement for general liability coverage

2. Additional Insured endorsement for auto liability coverage

3. Waiver of Subrogation for workers compensation coverage R. Intellectual Property. Any system or documents developed, produced or provided under this Agreement, including any intellectual property discovered or developed by Vendor in the course of performing or otherwise as a result of its work, shall become the sole property of the City unless explicitly stated otherwise in this Agreement. The Vendor may retain copies of any and all material, including drawings, documents, and specifications, produced by the Vendor in performance of this Agreement. The City and the Vendor agree that to the extent permitted by law, until final approval by the City, all data shall be treated as confidential and will not be released to third parties without the prior written consent of both parties.

S. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. There are no understandings, Agreements, or representations of warranties, expressed or implied, not specified in this Agreement. This Agreement applies only to the current proposal as attached. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a subsequent written Agreement signed by both parties.

Assignment of this Agreement is prohibited without prior written consent.

T. Termination. The following clauses apply:

1. The City may terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time without cause by giving at least ten (10) days written notice to the Vendor. The written notice shall specify the date of termination. Upon receipt of such notice, the Vendor may continue work through the date of termination, provided that no work or service(s) shall be commenced or continued after receipt of the notice which is not intended to protect the interest of the City. The City shall pay the Vendor within thirty (30) days after receiving any invoice after the date of termination for all nonobjected to services performed by the Vendor in accordance herewith through the date of termination.

2. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause. In the event the City terminates this Agreement for cause, the Vendor shall perform no further work or service(s) under the Agreement unless the notice of termination authorizes such further work.

3. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Vendor to provide all finished or unfinished documents and data and other information of any kind prepared by Vendor in connection with the 431
Version: 08/10/2026
performance of services under this Agreement. Vendor shall be required to provide such documents and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

4. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, similar to those terminated.

U. Payment. Payments to the Vendor pursuant to this Agreement will be reported to Federal and State taxing authorities as required. The City will not withhold any sums from compensation payable to Vendor. Vendor is independently responsible for the payment of all applicable taxes. Where the payment terms provide for compensation on a time and materials basis, the Vendor shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of the Vendor’s time and materials charges under the Agreement. Such records shall be retained by the Vendor for three (3) years following completion of the services under the Agreement.

V. Restrictions on City Employees. The Vendor shall not employ any City employee or official in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of federal, state, or local law.

W. Choice of Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement, and shall govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any legal proceeding arising from this Agreement shall be brought in the appropriate court located in Riverside County, State of California.

X. Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Vendor:

J.K. Miklin, Inc. dba Yamada Enterprises
16552 Burke Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Attn: Parker Braverman
City:

City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
P.O. Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Attn: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services Director 432
Version: 08/10/2026
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

Y. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

Z. City’s Right to Employ Other Vendors. City reserves right to employ other Vendors in connection with this project.

AA.Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both parties.

BB. Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

CC. Supplementary General Conditions (for projects that are funded by Federal programs). The following provisions, pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 13, Subpart C, Section 13.36, as it may be amended from time to time, are included in the Agreement and are required to be included in all subcontracts entered into by Vendor for work pursuant to the Agreement, unless otherwise expressly provided herein. These provisions supersede any conflicting provisions in the General Conditions and shall take precedence over the General Conditions for purposes of interpretation of the General Conditions. These provisions do not otherwise modify or replace General Conditions not in direct conflict with these provisions. Definitions used in these provisions are as contained in the General Conditions.

1. Vendor shall be subject to the administrative, contractual, and legal remedies provided in the General Conditions in the event Vendor violates or breaches terms of the Agreement.

2. City may terminate the Agreement for cause or for convenience, and Vendor may terminate the Agreement, as provided the General Conditions.

3. Vendor shall comply with Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60). (All construction contracts awarded in excess of $10,000 by City and/or subcontracts in excess of $10,000 entered into by Vendor.)
433
Version: 08/10/2026

4. Vendor shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3) (All contracts and subcontracts for construction or repair.)

5. Vendor shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a7) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5).

6. Vendorshall comply with Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5).

7. Vendor shall observe City requirements and regulations pertaining to reporting included in the General Conditions.

8. Patent rights with respect to any discovery or invention which arises or is developed in the course of or under the Agreement shall be retained by the City.

9. Copyrights and rights in data developed in the course of or under the Agreement shall be the property of the City. FEMA/CalOES reserve a royalty-free, nonexclusive, irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use or authorize to others to use for federal purposes a copyright in any work developed under the Agreement and/or subcontracts for work pursuant to the Agreement.

10. Vendor shall provide access by the City, the Federal grantor agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Vendor which are directly pertinent to that specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions.

11. Vendorshall retain all required records for three years after City makes final payments and all other pending matters relating to the Agreement are closed.

12. Vendor shall comply with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (This provision applies to contracts exceeding $100,000 and to subcontracts entered into pursuant to such contracts.)

13. Vendor shall comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94163, 89 Stat. 871).
434
Version: 08/10/2026
DD. Authority To Execute. The representative executing this Agreement on behalf of each party hereby represents and warrants that he or she has full power and authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that all approvals and other actions necessary in connection with the effective execution by him or her have been obtained and are in full force and effect as of his or her execution hereof.

4. PURCHASE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF GOODS:

This Agreement includes provisions for the sale and delivery of goods in conjunction with the services provided herein. The City (the 'Buyer') and the Vendor (the 'Seller') agree to the following terms for these transactions:

A. Description of Goods: The specific goods to be sold and delivered under this Agreement shall be as described in Exhibit "D" or, for future transactions, as specified in the Vendor’s purchase order, which, once accepted by the City, shall be binding and incorporated into this Agreement by reference.

B. Obligation to Sell and Purchase: Seller agrees to sell, and Buyer agrees to purchase, the goods described in Exhibit "D" or the Vendor’s purchase order pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

C. Delivery and Inspection: Seller shall deliver the goods to Buyer's designated location as specified in this Agreement. Buyer shall have the right to inspect the goods upon delivery to ensure they conform to the agreed specifications. Any discrepancies or defects must be reported to Seller within thirty (30) business days of delivery, after which Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted the goods.

D. Payment: Payment for the goods shall be made by Buyer to Seller upon the satisfactory delivery and acceptance of the goods, at the price and in the manner specified in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.

E. Risk of Loss: The risk of loss or damage to the goods shall pass from Seller to Buyer upon delivery and acceptance of the goods by Buyer.

F. Warranties: Seller warrants that the goods supplied under this Agreement shall be free from defects in material and workmanship and shall conform to the specifications described in Exhibit "D" or the Vendor’s purchase order. Should any of the goods fail to meet these warranties, Seller shall, at Buyer's option, replace the defective goods or refund the purchase price for such goods.

SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
435
DRAFT
436
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0318 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: September 1, 2026
TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF THE CALTRANS SUSTAINABLE

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT AWARD FOR

THE VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED REDUCTION AND

MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM AND ADOPTION OF A
RESOLUTION (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS)
(DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Accept And Approve The Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Award For The Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction And Mitigation Fee Program And Adopt Resolution 2026 -XX
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Accept and approve the Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Award Agreement between the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Moreno Valley (City) for the Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction (VMT) and Mitigation Fee Program in the amount of up to $265,592 (Fund 3001) with a City local match of $34,410 (Fund 3004);

2. Adopt Resolution 2026-XX, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley to authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to execute the Restricted Grant Agreement and any subsequent agreements, extensions, or amendments, subject to the approval of the City Attorney;
437
ID: 26-0318 Page 2

3. Authorize to amend the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2025- 26 and 2026-27 to include the Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program as Project Number 810 0030 for implementation;

4. Authorize the City Manager, or his/her designee, to award and execute an Agreement, and any subsequent agreements, extensions, or amendments, with a qualified consultant for the Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program, Project Number 810 0030, subject to the City’s procurement policy and approval of the City Attorney; and

5. Authorize a budget adjustment as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council accept the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (STPG) funding for the Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program, and adopt Resolution 2026-XX, which authorizes the City Manager, or his/her designee, to execute the Restricted Grant Agreement with Caltrans and to award and execute a consultant agreement necessary to implement the program.

The total estimated project cost is $300,000, and acceptance of grant funding is for up to $265,592, with a City local match requirement of $34,410.

DISCUSSION
On May 29, 2026, Caltrans announced the Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27. The City of Moreno Valley was awarded $265,592 to develop the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.

The VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program will assist the City in complying with the requirements of Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), which established VMT as the primary transportation impact metric under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The program will establish a comprehensive framework to evaluate transportation impacts of new development and identify appropriate mitigation strategies to support sustainable transportation objectives.

As part of the planning effort, the City will develop VMT thresholds and evaluation criteria, identify eligible mitigation projects and programs, evaluate potential mitigation fee methodologies, and recommend updates to the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program and Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. The project will also include coordination with regional and state agencies, stakeholder outreach, and public engagement to ensure the program reflects local transportation needs while supporting regional mobility and environmental objectives.

Acceptance of the grant funding and adoption of the attached Resolution will authorize the City to execute all documents necessary to implement the grant-funded planning effort in accordance with Caltrans program requirements. The proposed program supports the City's ongoing commitment to sustainable transportation planning, improved mobility, and compliance with State environmental regulations while positioning the City for future growth and transportation investments.
438
ID: 26-0318 Page 3

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report.

This alternative will allow the City to accept the awarded Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant funding and allow the Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program to move forward in a timely manner. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative will result in a loss of the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant funding. Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
This project is funded by the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant. The total estimated cost will be $300,000, with up to $265,592 in grant funding allocated to Fund 3001 (Capital Improvement Grants). Additionally, the City’s local match obligation of $34,410 will be funded with Fund 3004 (Traffic Signal Mitigation Project). There is no impact on the General Fund.

Category Fund GL Account No. Type Original
Budget
Proposed
Adjustments
Revised
Budget
CIP Capital Improvement
Grants (3001)
3001-99-99-93001-486010
Project No. 810 0030-3001-98
Rev $0 $265,592 $265,592
CIP Capital Improvement
Grants (3001)
3001-70-76-80010-720199
Project No. 810 0030-3001-99
Exp $0 $265,592 $265,592
CIP Traffic Signal Mitigation
Project
3004-70-76-80010-720199
Project No. 810 0030-3004-99
Exp $0 $34,410 $34,410
CIP
(Transfer In)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Project
3004-99-99-93004-802024 Rev $0 $34,410 $34,410
CIP
(Transfer Out)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Project
2024-99-99-92024-903004 Exp $0 $34,410 $34,410

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Ronald Boromeo Melissa Walker, P.E.

Associate Engineer Public Works Director/City Engineer
Concurred By: Concurred By:

Seth Jenison, P.E., T.E., PTOE Harold Zamora, P.E.

Principal Engineer/City Traffic Engineer Engineering Division Manager/Assistant City Engineer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Facilities and Capital Projects: Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained. 439
ID: 26-0318 Page 4
Public Safety: Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
440
ID: 26-0318 Page 5
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_PW_TED_VMT_PROGRAM.docx
Attachments: - City Resolution _VMT Program_STPG Award FY 2026_27_v08122026.doc
- VMT_STPG_Grand_Award_Letter.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Aug 26, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Melissa Walker
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
441
Attachment A
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(CALTRANS) FOR THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED REDUCTION AND

MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley is eligible to receive Federal and/or State funding for certain transportation planning related plans, through the California Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, a Restricted Grant Agreement is needed to be executed with the California Department of Transportation before such funds can be reimbursed through the Transportation Planning Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley wishes to delegate authorization to execute these agreements and any amendments thereto as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. RECITALS
The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY
That the City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Moreno Valley all agreements with the California Department of Transportation.

Section 3. SEVERABILITY
That if any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 442
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
Section 4. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Section 6. CERTIFICATION
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1
st day of September, 2026.
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
_______________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
443
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
____________________________________________
M. PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ, MMC, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
444
“Improving lives and communities through transportation.”

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
P.O. BOX 942873, MS–32 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273–0001
(916) 261-3326 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
May 29, 2026te

SENT VIA E-MAIL
On behalf of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Transportation Planning, we are pleased to congratulate you on your Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant award.

Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program
Grant Award
Fiscal Year
Grant
Category
Grant Fund
Source
Project Title
Grantee/Agency
Executive Director
Grantee/Agency
Contact
Sub-Recipient(s)
Caltrans District
Contact(s)
Caltrans District
Contact(s) E-mail
Grant Award Local Match
(Cash)
Local Match
(In-Kind)
Total
Local Match
%
Local Match
Total
Project Cost
Conditions of Award Due to Caltrans Grant Expiration Date Final Invoice Due * The final contractually agreed upon Local Match and Fund Source are located on the Grant Application Cover Sheet and Cost & Schedule. Any change in Local Match that increases/decreases the Total Project Cost must be approved by Caltrans and may require a Formal Amendment. Each invoice must include the contractual/agreed upon local match % - any deviation to this amount requires an approved Tapered Local Match prior to invoice submittal. Any change to the Local Match Fund Source requires prior Caltrans approval and an Administrative Amendment. 2026-27 Sustainable Communities Technical SHA Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program City of Moreno Valley Melissa Walker Ronald P. Borromeo Ricky Rivers, Stephanie Ahmad [email protected], [email protected] $265,592 $34,410 N/A $34,410 11.47% $300,000 July 10, 2026 June 30, 2029 August 29, 2029 445
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0341 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Angelica Frausto-Lupo, Community Development
Department
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
AGENDA DATE: September 1, 2026
TITLE: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING

CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND TRUCK
ROUTE ORDINANCE (REPORT OF: COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Continuation of Public Hearing Regarding Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Route Ordinance
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council continue the Public Hearing regarding the following recommended actions:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX finding and determining that the Addendum prepared for the MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council on April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-XX approving an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan pursuant to AB 98 and SB 415 and revising the City's truck route map; and

3. Introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. 2026-XX amending the truck route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the 446
ID: 26-0341 Page 2
City's amended Circulation Element and in compliance with pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and adopt (Second Reading) the same at a subsequent City Council meeting.

SUMMARY
On August 13, 2026, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4- 0 to recommend that the City Council introduce and adopt the attached Resolution and Ordinance approving an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan, revising the City's truck route map, and amending the truck route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City's amended Circulation Element and in compliance with pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

The City Attorney is requesting that the Public Hearing be continued to the October 20, 2026, regular City Council meeting to conduct some additional public outreach regarding the proposed revisions to the City’s truck route network and proposed amendments to the Municipal Code and Circulation Element of the City’s recently updated 2024 General Plan, as approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026.

DISCUSSION
The staff report outlines the requirements of AB 98 and SB 415, which mandate that the City amend the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan to address truck traffic from logistics-use developments. It also includes a proposed truck route map and the proposed amendments to the Circulation Element. In addition, the report details the City’s community engagement efforts to inform residents and other stakeholders about the City’s proposed revisions to its truck route network and to solicit their input on the proposed elimination and/or realignment of numerous City truck routes.

Background - Proposed Project
The Proposed Project consists of: (1) a proposed amendment, mandated by Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98) and Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), to the Circulation Element of the Moreno Valley General Plan (Amendment). The Amendment includes revisions to the discussion, policies, actions, and exhibits, as well as corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element; and (2) a proposed Truck Route Ordinance that revises the City’s designated truck routes map and the truck route provisions in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the Amendment and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

AB 98 and SB 415
On September 29, 2024, the Governor signed AB 98 into law. It requires jurisdictions within the State’s designated logistics warehouse concentration regions (which include the City of Moreno Valley) to update their General Plan Circulation Elements by January 1, 2026, to identify and establish designated truck routes for the movement of goods. AB 98 responds to the public health, environmental, and quality-of-life impacts stemming 447
ID: 26-0341 Page 3
from the growth of logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 requires local jurisdictions to designate truck routes that prioritize major arterials and highways, avoid sensitive land uses such as homes, schools, and healthcare facilities, and include public signage and accessible mapping. AB 98 also imposes new development standards for logistics warehouse facilities, including setbacks, buffers, air-quality mitigation, and the use of zero-emission equipment. The intent of AB 98 is to create a more equitable and sustainable approach to goods movement associated with logistics warehouse facilities.

In summary, AB 98 aims to reduce disproportionate burdens on vulnerable communities, promote cleaner industrial practices, and balance economic development with public health and environmental justice.

On October 3, 2025, the Governor signed SB 415 into law, which defines and clarifies various standards first introduced in AB 98. For instance, SB 415 sets specific standards for logistics warehouse development, truck route ordinances, and environmental protection, including those related to air quality and health impacts.

Although the City was required to update its General Plan Circulation Element by January 1, 2026, when AB 98 and SB 415 were signed into law, the City was preparing the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2024 RFEIR) in response to a Judgment and Writ issued by the Riverside County Superior Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300).

MoVal 2040 Project
In June and August 2021, the City Council approved the previous MoVal 2040 Project, which consisted of the 2021 General Plan Update (2021 GPU), the 2021 Climate Action Plan (2021 CAP), and related 2021 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments (2021 Zoning Amendments) (collectively, the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project), and certified the 2021 Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2021 FEIR) prepared for the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, the Sierra Club filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Riverside County Superior Court (Case No. CVRI2103300), challenging the City’s decision to certify the 2021 FEIR and approve the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Subsequently, the California Attorney General intervened in the case by filing a Petition for Writ of Mandate-in-Intervention.

The case concluded with a Statement of Decision from the Riverside County Superior Court (Court), dated March 5, 2024, in which the Court granted the petition on the issues limited to baseline (existing conditions analysis), air quality, climate change (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions), and energy use. The Statement of Decision was followed by a Judgment and Writ issued by the Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300). The Writ commanded the City to set aside the City Council’s certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 2021 CAP, and the 2021 Zoning Amendments. In the City’s Final Return to the Writ and Request for Discharge of the Writ, the City confirmed that, in compliance with the Writ, it took the appropriate actions to set aside the City Council’s certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 2021 CAP, and the 2021 Zoning Amendments. 448
ID: 26-0341 Page 4
In early 2025, the City began preparing the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (consisting of the 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments) and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project’s Revised Draft Program EIR (2024 RDEIR) to correct the deficiencies identified in the Writ, consistent with the Statement of Decision. On August 14, 2024, a public scoping meeting was held to solicit input from the public and interested agencies on the scope of the necessary environmental analysis for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

Following the scoping meeting, the 2024 RDEIR was prepared and circulated for a 45- day public review period, commencing July 7, 2025, through August 21, 2025, followed by a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley Planning Commission (Planning Commission) on October 9, 2025, to consider the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and the 2024 RDEIR. However, due to the receipt of a letter from the State of California Office of the Attorney General (AGO) on October 7, 2025, regarding the proposed 2024 CAP and the 2024 RDEIR’s various air quality issues and mitigation measures, the City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission continue the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to provide staff sufficient time to respond to the issues and mitigation measures raised by the AGO. As such, the Planning Commission continued the October 9, 2025, Planning Commission public hearing to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting, scheduled for October 23, 2025. At the duly noticed October 23, 2025 public hearing, after hearing a staff report, receiving public testimony, and engaging in deliberation, the Planning Commission voted to: (a) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley City Council, held on April 21, 2026, the City Council voted to adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (PEN25-0020).

Notwithstanding the certification of the 2024 RFEIR, the approval of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, from November 2025 through April 2026, the City was committed to engaging the public and interested stakeholders in preparing a revised truck route map and a related amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU in compliance with the mandates set forth in AB 98 and SB 415.

However, due to the City’s concentrated efforts and the time and resources committed to analyzing and preparing the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, the 2024 RDEIR, and the 2024 RFIER, and to the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, the City informed the AGO that additional time was necessary to conduct the community engagement required to solicit thorough and meaningful input from the public and other interested stakeholders on revisions to the City’s current truck routes map, to ensure that the proper changes are made not only in compliance with the mandates of AB 98 and SB 415 but also consistent with the plans and policies of the various elements of the City’s recently approved 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments, and with the applicable mitigation measures set forth in the 2024 RFIER. Staff also wanted to ensure that any revisions to the City’s current truck routes were consistent with the objectives of the air-quality-related mitigation measures under negotiation with the AGO. On June 25, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City 449
ID: 26-0341 Page 5
Council approve, in the context of an ordinance titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Amending Chapter 9.05 (Industrial Districts) of Title 9 (Planning And Zoning) to add Section 9.05.060 (Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measures)” (AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance). The proposed ordinance containing the negotiated mitigation measures was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 25, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, at which the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the City Council consider it at a noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on August 18, 2026.

Community Engagement
As part of its effort to inform the general community about the proposed changes to the City’s designated truck route network and to solicit input, the City created an “interactive” landing page on its website titled “AB 98 / SB 415 Truck Routes in Moreno Valley” (AB 98/SB 415 Truck Routes | Public Works | City of Moreno Valley). The public was informed that AB 98 and SB 415 set new statewide rules for large warehouse and logistics facilities to better protect nearby communities, with the aim of reducing truck traffic, air pollution, noise, and bright lighting—especially near sensitive receptors such as homes, schools, and parks. The public was further informed that under these new laws, large warehouses must follow improved standards for location, design, and truck routing, include buffers to limit impacts on neighbors, and, in some cases, replace housing if it is displaced by warehouse development. In addition, the public was provided with an interactive GIS map called “Proposed AB 98/SB 415 Truck Route Map.” This allowed the public to remotely view existing truck routes and potential changes, or download a printable static map in PDF format. The map allows the public to view the current truck route network and the proposed truck route network.

The truck route landing page also included a list of “Frequently Asked Questions” and responses prepared by City staff. The Frequently Asked Questions included:
 What is AB 98?
 What is a sensitive receptor?
 What is the warehouse concentrated region?
 What is a truck route?
 What does the City have to do for truck routes?
 Will this change where trucks park and stop?
 How do truck routes affect the community?
 How were the routes chosen?
 What is the mandatory use for truck routes?
In addition to the above Frequently Asked Questions, the truck route landing page included questions asked in the context of several public outreach meetings and answers prepared by City staff. Below is a sample of some of the questions and answers posted on the landing page:
 Has the City coordinated truck route removals with neighboring cities, such as Redlands and Perris?
450
ID: 26-0341 Page 6
Yes. The City is coordinating with nearby cities and Riverside County to make sure truck routes connect smoothly across city boundaries.  Can trucks still travel on streets that are not designated truck routes? Yes, for certain reasons. Federal law allows trucks to use non-truck routes if they are making a delivery or need to reach a specific destination. State law also requires that trucks be able to deviate from assigned truck routes when doing so is necessary to make a delivery.
 Will the City install new signage for truck routes?
Yes. The City will install signs identifying the designated truck routes. Both AB 98 and SB 415 require signs to be installed at all heavy-duty truck exit driveways directing truck drivers to designated truck routes and to the state highway system, which includes Interstate 215 and State Route 60. Both AB 98 AND SB 415 also require the City to post conspicuous signage to identify truck routes, and to make truck routes publicly available in a Geographic Information System (GIS) format, and to share the GIS maps of the truck routes with warehouse operators, fleet operators, and truck drivers.
 Will truck parking and idling regulations change?
The Moreno Valley Municipal Code currently prohibits trucks and other vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or more from parking: a) on any highway, street, road, alley or private property within any residential district within the City; b) on any vacant lot or unimproved nonresidential property in the City; c) on any nonresidential property so that any part of such vehicle is within 100 feet of any human dwelling; d) within 150 feet of any driveway opening; e) within any commercially zoned property for the purpose other than doing business at the site; f) on any nonresidential property so that any part of such vehicle is within 15 feet of the property line, a public sidewalk, or of a public or private roadway edge; g) on any alley within the City; and h) on any highway, street or road which is adjacent to a parcel upon which there exists a public facility, which includes parks and schools. Moreover, both AB 98 and SB 415, require the City to provide signage for truck parking. In addition, AB 98 and SB 415 require that logistics use developments submit a Truck Routing Plan to the Planning Division for its review and approval, prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy. The Truck Routing Plan must include a queueing analysis for preventing truck parking on public streets. In addition, whenever a new tenant moves into an existing logistic use development, a revised Truck Routing Plan must be submitted to the Planning Division for its review and approval, prior to the issuance of a business license. Upon such review, the Planning Division is authorized to determine if changes to the Truck Routing Plan are necessary, such as adding measures to alleviate any parking issues that may arise during the life of the logistics use development. With respect to idling, the Moreno Valley Municipal Code provides that while adjacent to a developed residential area within the City, trucks and other vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or more are prohibited from idling for longer than five minutes. However, both AB 451
ID: 26-0341 Page 7
98 and SB 415 prohibit idling of heavy-duty truck engines for more than 3 minutes at a logistics use development and require that signs regarding the 3-minute restriction be posted at logistics use developments along entrances to the site and at the truck loading bays. Signs are also required to be posted identifying any appropriate idling facility locations – if any. AB 98 and SB 415 also prohibit idling while powering climate control equipment if the truck is capable of plugging in at a loading bay. In light of the foregoing, staff may be recommending that the fiveminute idling restriction set forth in the Municipal Code be revised to 3 minutes to be consistent with AB 98 and SB 415’s on-site idling restrictions.  What changes are proposed to the truck route map, and how do they reduce impacts near homes, schools and parks?
The proposed changes to the City’s current truck routes are depicted on the interactive map located at: moval.org/truck routes. The proposed changes were guided by the provisions of AB 98 and SB 415, as described below. AB 98 and SB 415 mandate that City update the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan to: a) Identify and establish specific travel routes for the transport of goods, materials, or freight for storage, transfer, or redistribution to safely accommodate additional truck traffic and avoid residential areas and sensitive receptors; and b) Maximize the use of interstate or state divided highways as preferred routes for truck routes. AB 98 and SB 415 further provide that major or minor collector streets and local roads that predominantly serve commercial or industrial uses shall be used for truck routes only when strictly necessary to reach existing industrial zones and that trucks be routed via transportation arteries that minimize exposure to sensitive receptors. “Sensitive receptors” include the following: a) residence, including, but not limited to, a private home, apartment, condominium unit, group home, dormitory unit, or retirement home; b) a school, including, but not limited to, a preschool, prekindergarten, or school maintaining kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive; c) daycare facility, including, but not limited to, in-home daycare; d) publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas or facilities primarily used by children; e) nursing homes, long-term care facilities, hospices, convalescent facilities, or similar live-in housing; and f) hospitals.  How is the City of Moreno Valley balancing truck access with protecting neighborhoods and other sensitive areas?
The City reviews truck traffic volumes, nearby land uses, and road design to ensure trucks can reach destinations while minimizing impacts on sensitive receptors, such as homes, schools, parks, medical facilities, etc. This approach is guided by AB 98 and SB 415, which require cities to minimize truck exposure to sensitive receptors while still maintaining efficient goods movement.  How will the City of Moreno Valley notify Caltrans, trucking companies, and GPS providers about truck route changes?
452
ID: 26-0341 Page 8
The City will communicate the approved truck routes with relevant agencies and stakeholders so navigation systems and trucking operations can update their routing information. AB 98 and SB 415 both require the City to make truck route maps publicly available in GIS format and to share those maps with warehouse operators, fleet operators, and truck drivers.
 What signage will be removed or installed, and where will it be placed? Signs will be removed from streets that are no longer truck routes. New directional or “No Truck” signs will be installed where needed to guide drivers. The Moreno Valley Municipal Code requires that the City label truck routes with conspicuous signs erected at all entrances to truck routes. Further, the Municipal Code also requires the City to erect conspicuous signs at entrances of streets where trucks are prohibited. This signage work is required by AB 98 and SB 415, which direct cities to clearly identify truck routes and install directional signage to guide trucks to approved routes.
 How will SB 415 truck idling rules be implemented and enforced? SB 415, building on AB 98, requires a three minute idling limit at logistics use developments and specifies that signage must be posted at entrances and loading bays, with enforcement handled consistent with local authority. The City will handle signage in the public right-of-way, while private property signage is the responsibility of the property owner. Violations of the three-minute idling limit would subject the violator to a misdemeanor citation.
 What is the enforcement plan for truck route, parking, and idling violations? The Moreno Valley Police Department and the City’s Code Compliance Officers will enforce violations based on the type of violation and where the violation occurs.

SB 415 requires the City to have at least one CHP trained enforcement officer for purposes of truck route enforcement. The City currently has two CHP-trained officers. The City has not yet determined how many deputies will be needed for enforcement of the City’s truck routes ordinance, which is a decision that the City may consider at any time in the future if more officers become necessary.  When will new truck route signs be installed?
Signs will be installed or removed after the proposed truck route map is officially approved. AB 98 and SB 415 require signage to be installed once truck routes are formally adopted and incorporated into the City’s circulation planning.

The truck route landing page also listed contact information for any additional comments and questions.
453
ID: 26-0341 Page 9
The City also engaged the community on the truck route issue in the context of the following community events.

Neighborhood Outreach November 25th, 2025 Moreno Valley Mall (Food Court)
Neighborhood Outreach November 25th, 2025 City Library
(Alessandro Bl. at
Kitching St.)
Traffic Safety Commission December 3rd, 2025 City Hall Council Chamber
Stakeholders Meeting December 11th, 2025 City Hall Public Works Department
Val Verde School District December 16th, 2025 Virtual Meeting Traffic Safety Commission January 7th, 2026 City Hall Council Chamber
Traffic Safety Commission February 4th, 2026 at
6pm
City Hall Council
Chamber
Planning Commission
(Receive and File
presentation only)
February 12, 2026 at 6
PM
City Hall Council
Chamber
AB 98/SB 415 Workshop March 4th, 2026 at 6pm City Hall Council Chamber
Community Development
Community Outreach
Meeting
(Logistics Facilities
Mitigation)
May 13th, 2026 at 6pm
- 8pm
Palm Middle School
(Library)
City staff also met with representatives of the Moreno Valley School District and Val Verde School District to provide detailed information on the proposed revisions to the City’s truck route network. The City’s Assistant City Engineer presented the issue to the Board of Trustees of the Moreno Valley School District at its regular Board meeting in July 2026.

Moreover, on February 21, 2026, the City Attorney attended a Summit organized by the Freight Community Action Coalition and the Center for Community Action and 454
ID: 26-0341 Page 10
Environmental Justice and delivered a presentation on the City’s proposed revisions to its truck route network, fielding numerous questions from the Summit’s attendees.

The City reached out to the following stakeholders, informing them of the City’s efforts to revise its truck route network in accordance with AB 98 and SB 415, and providing a link to the City’s truck route landing page on the City’s website for additional information (see attached emails).
 Moreno Valley Unified School District
 Val Verde Unified School District
 Moreno Valley Chamber of Commerce
 Moreno Valley Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
 Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Indians
 Morongo Band of Mission Indians
 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
 Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians
 Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
 Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation
Circulation Element Amendment
The proposed Amendment satisfies the statutory requirements for the General Plan Circulation Element and provides a circulation diagram identifying major thoroughfares; transportation routes for vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians; and a military airport.

The Amendment also includes policies for “complete streets,” which provide a balanced, multimodal transportation network serving all users and abilities. These policies support other chapters of the General Plan by providing and enhancing multimodal transportation options and supporting adjacent land uses. The Amendment also indicates that the City will require new logistics warehouse developments to prepare truck routing plans consistent with the designated truck routes network. These plans will be subject to periodic review for any necessary updates to respond to land use changes, community concerns, and evolving goods movement patterns.

The proposed Amendment would also revise the policies and actions that support Goal C-6 of the Circulation Element, which directs the City to ensure safe, efficient goods movement by road, air, and rail. The Amendment sets forth the following new actions to support Goal C-6:
 Maintain and regularly update a publicly accessible Truck Route Map, including GIS data, to clearly identify designated routes and support enforcement and coordination with regional agencies;
 Require new logistics warehouse developments to be located and designed to minimize reliance on local streets and avoid creating new truck traffic conflicts with sensitive receptors; and
455
ID: 26-0341 Page 11
 Coordinate with Caltrans, neighboring jurisdictions, and regional agencies to align truck routes and minimize the need for trucks servicing logistics warehouse developments to use non-designated local streets.

Additionally, the proposed Amendment revises actions outlined in the Circulation Element to maintain internal consistency with the other proposed revisions to the Circulation Element, which further define actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided.

Together, these revisions incorporate the development and siting standards required by AB 98 and SB 415 and are consistent with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO. As such, the following actions are included to support Goal C6:
 Avoid routing truck traffic through or adjacent to sensitive land uses to the extent feasible; where avoidance is not feasible due to existing conditions, implement mitigation measures such as buffering, signage, and operational controls; and  Continue to require all new or expanded logistics warehouse developments to comply with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.

Truck Route Ordinance
The Truck Route Ordinance includes a revised truck route map.

The City’s existing truck routes are shown in Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet, as presented in the Addendum. The figure identifies areas of potential conflict where sensitive receptors, as defined in AB 98 and SB 415 (e.g., schools, parks, care facilities, and residential areas), are located within 1,000 feet of an existing truck route. As shown in Figure 2, SR-60 and I-215 are part of the federally designated National Network Route. The key segments of the City’s existing truck routes are Perris Boulevard, Alessandro Boulevard, Frederick Street, and Heacock Street, which carry some of the highest truck volumes in the City, with daily truck traffic ranging from approximately 1,300 to 1,600 trucks. Perris Boulevard and Heacock Street, particularly north of Alessandro Boulevard, serve as key north–south connectors. These segments pass through established residential neighborhoods and areas with a concentration of schools and community facilities, which are considered sensitive receptors. Alessandro Boulevard, a major east–west corridor, is largely commercial in character; however, segments, particularly east of Heacock Street, interface with residential uses and schools. Frederick Street and portions of Redlands Boulevard exhibit a similar pattern, with commercial uses interspersed with residential neighborhoods, increasing the potential for conflicts with sensitive receptors.

The proposed truck route revises the City’s truck route network, as shown in Figure 3:

Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet, found in the Addendum. The existing truck routes that will be eliminated as officially designated truck routes from the proposed truck route network are shown in Figure 4, Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated, also found in the Addendum. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, with 456
ID: 26-0341 Page 12
the elimination of numerous existing truck routes, the realignment of others, and the addition of segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60, the proposed truck route network would reduce truck travel activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors and shift freight movement to regional corridors such as SR-60 and I-215, while prioritizing access to industrial areas that permit logistics warehouse facilities. The proposed truck route network, as shown in Figure 3, is mainly limited to portions of Alessandro Boulevard, Cactus Avenue, Perris Boulevard, and several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses.

Due to existing development patterns and limited alternative corridors, complete avoidance of sensitive receptors is not feasible in all locations. Accordingly, the City will implement a combination of mitigation and operational strategies, including signage, buffering, and traffic management measures, that are either addressed in the proposed Tuck Route Ordinance and/or incorporated into the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance. Moreover, truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions may not align with the Proposed Project’s truck route network; however, in such cases (as discussed below), trucks are permitted to use non-designated local streets within the City to access the nearest designated truck route. In addition, trucks serving local commercial and industrial uses will continue to use the most direct routes where necessary, as alternative designated routes may not provide feasible access to final destinations. California Vehicle Code § 35703 mandates that no city may adopt a truck route ordinance that prohibits "any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained." Moreover, 49 USCS § 31114(a) prohibits any laws that deny certain commercial motor vehicles reasonable access between certain interstate highways and other qualifying highways and certain facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods, etc.

REVIEW PROCESS
As part of the standard review process, the Ordinance and Matrix were circulated for review by all appropriate City Departments and Divisions. Following staff review, City staff have confirmed that the Ordinance is consistent with the applicable Municipal Code findings described below.

Pursuant to 9.02.050 (Amendments to zoning districts or other provisions of Title 9) of Chapter 9.02 (Permits and Approvals) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Municipal Code, amendments to Title 9, including amendments to the zoning atlas, may be made if:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the general plan and its goals, objectives, policies, and programs, and with any applicable specific plan; 457
ID: 26-0341 Page 13

2. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect public health, safety or general welfare;

3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes and intent of Title 9; and

4. The proposed amendment will provide public benefits to the general community beyond those that may be unilaterally imposed by the city through the traditional exaction process, which will enhance public safety services, promote public health, increase recreational opportunities, and improve general community services for children.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Addendum analyzes potential impacts of the Proposed Project compared with the impacts identified and evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR.

As Lead Agency, the City is required to review and consider whether the Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated in the 2024 RFEIR. In other words, additional CEQA review would be triggered only if the Proposed Project would result in new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated in the 2024 RFEIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that an addendum is the appropriate CEQA document for a project if the lead agency finds that major revisions to a prior certified environmental impact report are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that call for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.

As detailed in the attached Addendum, the Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe significant impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated in the 2024 RFEIR. As demonstrated in the Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same as or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Addendum to the previously certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Continue the Public Hearing to October 20, 2026, regular City Council meeting, as requested by the City Attorney, to conduct some additional public outreach regarding the proposed revisions to the City’s truck route network and proposed amendments to the Municipal Code and Circulation Element of the City’s recently updated 2024 General Plan, as approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026.

2. Do not continue the Public Hearing and Introduce the Resolution and Ordinance as presented to and recommended by the Planning Commission and adopt the Resolution and Ordinance at a subsequent City Council meeting. 458
ID: 26-0341 Page 14

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impacts are anticipated from the approval and adoption of the proposed Ordinance. However, it is anticipated that the proposed modifications will successfully address industrial regulations, which are expected to positively impact development and yield a positive fiscal impact for the City.

NOTIFICATION
Because the provisions of the Proposed Project (PEN26-0058) will apply citywide, the notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Press-Enterprise on August 21, 2026, meeting the State’s minimum 10-day prior notice requirements for the City Council Public Hearing.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Claudia Manrique Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Associate Planner Director of Community Development
Concurred By:

Sergio Madera
Planning Division Manager

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
459
ID: 26-0341 Page 15
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_CDD_PEN26-0058.docx
Attachments: - 1 CC Resolution CEQA rev.pdf
- 2 CC Resolution GPA rev.pdf
- CC Truck Routes Ordinance rev.pdf
Final Approval Date: Aug 26, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
460
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL

APPROVE AN ADDENDUM TO THE REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT CERTIFIED FOR THE 2024 MOVAL 2024 PROJECT, CONSISTING OF THE 2024 MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE, 2024 ASSOCIATED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING & ZONING) AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS, AND
2024 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley ("City") is a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, in April and May of 2025, the City Council took the appropriate actions to approve the 2024 MoVal 2024 Project, consisting of the 2024 Moreno Valley General Plan Update, 2024 Associated Zoning Text Amendments to Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) and Zoning Atlas Amendments, and 2024 Climate Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the 2024 General Plan Update (2024 GPU), is a comprehensive General Plan Update that articulates a vision for the City’s growth over the next 20 years, which includes the implementation of five new General Plan land use designations consisting of Business-Flex, Corridor Mixed Use, Center Mixed Use, Downtown Center, and Highway Office/Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Climate Action Plan (2024 CAP”) describes and demonstrates how the City will comply with the State’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction standards and goals and streamline environmental review of certain future development projects; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments implement the land use policies and regulations, such as but not limited to zoning and development standards, and the goals and objectives set forth and described in the 2024 GPU; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-19, approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Certifying the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (2024 RFEIR) (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022); and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2026 and May 7, 2026, Notices of Determination were filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of the Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California 461
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with Assembly Bill 98 and Senate Bill 415, which calls for cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive receptor areas, in relation to logistics warehouse facilities, staff has prepared proposed amendments to the Circulation Element of the 2024 General Plan and a proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 12.36 (Truck Routes) of Title 12 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the City’s Municipal Code regarding truck routes (collectively, Proposed Project); and WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency” charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Proposed Project, and as part of its decision-making process, the City as Lead Agency is required to review and consider whether the Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the previously certified 2024 RFEIR; and WHEREAS, staff has determined that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project, since no major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered in that the Proposed Project will not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR, and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that will result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled before the Moreno Valley Planning Commission for August 13, 2026, and notice thereof was duly published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted the duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Proposed Project (PEN26- 0058) and Addendum to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and present evidence, 462
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
after which the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council find and determine that the Addendum prepared for the MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled before the Moreno Valley City Council for September 1, 2026, and notice thereof was duly published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals
That the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all evidence submitted into the administrative record for the Addendum, including but not limited to:
(a) The proposed Circulation Element Amendment and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(b) The proposed Truck Route Ordinance amending Chapter 12.36 (Truck Routes) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(c) The Addendum to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) and all documents, records, and references contained therein; (d) The previously certified Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(e) The City Council Staff Report and all documents, records, references contained therein, and staff presentations related thereto; (f) Testimony and comments received during the public hearing; and (g) All written correspondence submitted before or during the public hearing.

Section 3. Findings
463
4 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
That based on the foregoing Recitals and Evidence contained in the Administrative Record, the Planning Commission finds that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project, since no major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered in that the Proposed Project will not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR, no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that will result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified.

Section 4. Recommendation
That based upon the foregoing Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record, and Findings, the City Council hereby finds that the Addendum prepared for the MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all provisions previously adopted by the City Council in conflict with this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 6. Severability
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, or words as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

Section 8. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. 464
5 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of September, 2026.
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
Attachment: Addendum
465
6 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: September 1, 2026

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
__________________________________________
M. PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ, MMC, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
466
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE REVISED FINAL

PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE 2024 MOVAL 2040 PROJECT:
2024 MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, 2024
ASSOCIATED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9
(PLANNING & ZONING) AND ZONING ATLAS
AMENDMENTS, AND 2024 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #2020039022)
SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT

UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTES ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK

ROUTES MAP PROJECT
Prepared For:

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development Department
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
P.O. Box 88005
Moreno Valley CA 92552-0805
P 951.413.3206
Prepared By:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
P 213.261.4040
JULY 2026
467
468
Table of Contents
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project i Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM............................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Project ...........................................................................................2

2.2 AB 98 and SB 415 ...................................................................................................................3

2.3 Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Routes Map Update Ordinance...........................5 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT........................................................................................ 7

3.1 Project Setting and Location...................................................................................................7

3.2 Project Description.................................................................................................................8

3.3 Project Approvals................................................................................................................. 10 4 2024 REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SUMMARY ............................................... 15 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS............................................................................................... 17

5.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................ 18

5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ..................................................................................... 21

5.3 Air Quality............................................................................................................................ 25

5.4 Biological Resources............................................................................................................. 37

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................. 44

5.6 Energy.................................................................................................................................. 51

5.7 Geology and Soils................................................................................................................. 54

5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................... 58

5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 62

5.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................... 65

5.11 Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................................... 68

5.12 Mineral Resources................................................................................................................ 70

5.13 Noise.................................................................................................................................... 72

5.14 Population and Housing ....................................................................................................... 77

5.15 Public Services and Recreation ............................................................................................. 80

5.16 Transportation ..................................................................................................................... 83

5.17 Utilities and Service Systems................................................................................................ 87

5.18 Wildfire................................................................................................................................ 90 6 DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE CEQA DOCUMENTATION.......................................................... 93 7 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 96 8 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................... 97 469
Table of Contents
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project ii Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location Map............................................................................................................ 11 Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet............................................. 12 Figure 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet.......................................... 13 Figure 4: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet... 14

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040) .................................................... 33 Table 2: Change in 2040 Daily Truck VMT on Selected Routes & Truck Trip Origins................................ 85 Table 3: Net Change in Total Citywide Daily Truck VMT ......................................................................... 85

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: MoVal 2040 Revised Final EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment
Appendix C: Traffic Noise Assessment
Appendix D: Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
470
Purpose of the Addendum
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 1 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.); the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of Moreno Valley (City). The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration is only required when:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
471
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 2 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 2 BACKGROUND

2.1 2024 MoVal 2040 Project
The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Circulation Element Update Project (Project) implements minor changes and additions to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, which consists of the following:

1. 2024 General Plan Update (2024 GPU), which is a comprehensive General Plan Update that articulates a vision for the City’s growth over the next 20 years, which includes the implementation of five new General Plan land use designations consisting of Business-Flex, Corridor Mixed Use, Center Mixed Use, Downtown Center, and Highway Office/Commercial;

2. 2024 Climate Action Plan (2024 CAP) that describes and demonstrates how the City will comply with the State’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction standards and goals and streamline environmental review of certain future development projects; and

3. 2024 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments to implement the land use policies and regulations, such as but not limited to zoning and development standards, and the goals and objectives set forth and described in the 2024 GPU.

On April 21, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Moreno Valley City Council (City Council) took the following actions:

1. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-19, approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Certifying the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (2024 RFEIR);

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-20, approving the 2024 GPU and 2024 CAP; and

3. Introduced (First Reading) Ordinance No. 1042, approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments.

Thereafter, on April 24, 2026, a Notice of Determination was filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of the Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

On May 5, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed regular meeting of the City Council, the City Council passed and adopted (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 1042 approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments, which amended the text of Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and the City’s official Zoning Atlas to ensure that the text of Title 9 and the zoning designations depicted in the Zoning Atlas are consistent with the land use policies and regulations set forth and described in the 2024 GPU.

Thereafter, on May 7, 2026, a Notice of Determination regarding the second reading of Ordinance No. 1042 was filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and 472
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 3 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

2.2 AB 98 and SB 415
On September 29, 2024, Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98) was signed into law by Governor Newsom and requires jurisdictions within the State’s designated logistics warehouse concentration regions (which include the City of Moreno Valley) to update their General Plan Circulation Elements by January 1, 2026, to identify and establish designated truck routes for the movement of goods. AB 98 responds to the public health, environmental, and quality-of-life impacts stemming from the growth of logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 requires local jurisdictions to designate truck routes that prioritize the use of major arterials and highways, avoid sensitive land uses such as, but not limited to, homes, schools, and healthcare facilities, and include public signage and accessible mapping. AB 98 also imposes new development standards for logistics warehouse facilities, including setbacks, buffers, air-quality mitigation, and the use of zeroemission equipment. The intent of AB 98 is to create a more equitable and sustainable approach to goods movement associated with logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 aims to reduce disproportionate burdens on vulnerable communities, promote cleaner industrial practices, and balance economic development with public health and environmental justice.

On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom then signed into law Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), which defined various standards initially introduced in AB 98.1SB 415 defines specific logistics warehouse development standards, truck routes ordinance requirements, and environmental protection requirements, including those pertaining to air quality and health impacts. However, at the time AB 98 and SB 415 were signed into law, the City was in the process of preparing the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2024 RFEIR) in response to a Judgment and Writ issued by Riverside County Superior Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300).

In June 2021 and August 2021, the City Council approved the previous MoVal 2040 Project which consisted of the 2021 General Plan Update (2021 GPU), 2021 Climate Action Plan (2021 CAP), and related 2021 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments (2021 Zoning Amendments), (collectively, the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project) and certified 2021 Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2021 FEIR) prepared for 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, the Sierra Club filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Riverside County Superior Court (Case No. CVRI2103300), challenging the City’s decision to certify the 2021 FEIR and approve the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project.

Subsequently, the California Attorney General intervened in the case through the filing of a Petition for Writ of Mandate-in-Intervention.

The case was concluded with a Statement of Decision from the Riverside County Superior Court (Court), dated March 5, 2024, in which the Court granted the petition on the issues limited to baseline (existing conditions analysis), air quality, climate change (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions), and energy use. The Statement of Decision was followed by the Judgment and Writ issued by the Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300). The Writ commanded the City to set aside the City Council’s certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 1 California Legislative Information, Senate Bill No. 415, Planning and Zoning, Logistics Use Development Truck Routes, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB415. Accessed January 8, 2026 473
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 4 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 2021 CAP and 2021 Zoning Amendments. In the City’s Final Return to the Writ and Request for Discharge of the Writ, the City confirmed that, in compliance with the Writ, it took the appropriate actions to set aside certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 2021 CAP and 2021 Zoning Amendments. All parties stipulated to the City’s compliance with the Writ which Court then fully discharged on September 19, 2024.

Immediately after the Court’s discharge of the Writ, the City commenced the preparation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (consisting of the 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments) and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Project’s Revised Draft Program EIR (2024 RDEIR), to correct the deficiencies identified in the Writ, consistent with the Statement of Decision. On August 14, 2025, a public scoping meeting was held to solicit input from the public and interested agencies on the scope of the necessary environmental analysis for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Following the scoping meeting, the 2024 RDEIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period, commencing July 7, 2025, through August 21, 2025, followed by a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley Planning Commission (Planning Commission) on October 9, 2025, to consider the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and the 2024 RDEIR. However, due to the receipt of a letter from the State of California Office of the Attorney General Office (AGO) on October 7, 2025, regarding the proposed 2024 CAP and the 2024 RDEIR’s various air quality issues and mitigation measures, the Moreno Valley City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission continue the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to provide staff sufficient time to respond to the various issues and mitigation measures raised by the AGO. As such, the Planning Commission continued the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting, scheduled for October 23, 2025. At the duly noticed October 23, 2025 public hearing, after hearing a staff report, receiving public testimony and engaging in deliberation, the Planning Commission voted to: (a) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley City Council, the City Council voted to adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (PEN25-0020).

Notwithstanding the certification of the 2024 RFEIR and approval of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, from November 2025 through April 2026, the City was simultaneously committed to engaging the public and interested stakeholders in the preparation of a revised truck routes map and related amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU in compliance with the mandates set forth in AB 98 and SB 415. However, due to the City’s concentrated efforts and time and resources committed to analyzing and preparing the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and 2024 RDEIR and 2024 RFIER and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, the City informed the AGO that it was necessary that the City be provided additional time to conduct the necessary community engagement to solicit thorough and meaningful input from the public and other interested stakeholders on revisions to the City current truck routes map to ensure that the proper changes are made not only in compliance with the mandates of AB 98 and SB 415, but also consistent with the plans and policies of the various elements of the City’s recently approved 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP and 2024 Zoning Amendments and the applicable mitigation measures (PEN26-0055) set forth in the 2024 RFIER and the objectives of the air474 Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 5 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report quality related mitigation measures under negotiations with the AGO which on June 25, 2026 , in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve in the context of an ordinance, titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Amending Chapter 9.05 (Industrial Districts) of Title 9 (Planning And Zoning) to add Section 9.05.060 (Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measures).” (AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance) Incidentally, the mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO exceed the minimum comparative requirements of AB 98 and SB 415, and the proposed ordinance containing the negotiated mitigation measures has been scheduled for the City Council’s consideration at a noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on August 18, 2026.

2.3 Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Routes Map Update Ordinance
AB 98 and SB 415 call for cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive receptor areas, in relation to logistics warehouse facilities. The City proposes to comply with AB 98 and SB 415 by revising the Circulation Element and amending Chapter 36 of the Title 12 of the City’s Municipal Code regarding truck routes(“Truck Routes Ordinance”), as described in Section 3, below (collectively, the “Project”). The City’s Circulation Element Update satisfies the statutory requirements for the General Plan Circulation Element and provides a circulation diagram identifying major thoroughfares; transportation routes for vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians; and also a military airport. The Circulation Element Update also includes policies for “complete streets,” which provide a balanced, multimodal transportation network serving all users and abilities and supports other chapters of the General Plan by providing and enhancing multimodal transportation options and supporting adjacent land uses.

This Addendum analyzes potential impacts of the Project as described herein, as compared to impacts identified and evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR. As identified above, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency” charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Project. As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider whether the Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the in the 2024 RFEIR. Additional CEQA review beyond this Addendum would only be triggered if the Project would result in new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project, if the City finds that major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.

As detailed herein, the Project would not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA 475
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 6 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Guidelines Section 15164, this Addendum to the previously certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decisionmaking body must consider the whole of the data presented in the 2024 RFEIR and the previously adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as augmented by this Addendum. 476
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 7 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The Project consists of: (1) a proposed amendment, as mandated by AB 98 and SB 415, to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU, approved as part of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, to include revisions to the revisions to the discussion, policies, actions and exhibits and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s and exhibits, and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s Goods Movement section; (2) a proposed Truck Routes Ordinance containing revisions to the truck routes provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code ; and (3) a proposed Truck Routes Map, all consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and consistent with the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.

3.1 Project Setting and Location

3.1.1 Regional Location
The City is located in the western part of Riverside County. Interstate 215 (I-215) lies west of the City and State Route 60 (SR 60) runs through the northern portion of the City; see Figure 1: Regional Location Map.

These highways are accessed by multiple on/off ramps throughout the City and intersect in the western portion of the City (west of the Moreno Valley Mall) just outside of the City limits. The northern border of the City backs up to the Reche Canyon/Box Springs Mountain Reserve, which is just south of the Riverside/San Bernardino County line. To the east of the City lies the City of Beaumont, to the south is the City of Perris, and to the west is the City of Riverside.

3.1.2 Moreno Valley Truck Routes
The City’s ready access to the regional transportation network, which is supported by rail, air, and freeway connections, makes it a desirable location for goods movement. Goods movement in the City occurs primarily on major highways that bisect and border the City, including SR 60 and I-215. Truck traffic on City streets is restricted to specific routes that are designated for through traffic of trucks over three tons; the truck network system is identified in the City’s Municipal Code. These truck routes help facilitate the movement of goods throughout the City, while providing a connection between major highway facilities (i.e., SR 60 and I-215) to local roadways, such as Alessandro Boulevard, Heacock Street and Perris Boulevard. Truck traffic is restricted to these designated roadways, unless otherwise authorized by the California Vehicle Code, in order to minimize degradation of City streets and promote safety on residential streets. In addition, the City supports improvements to regional goods-movement facilities, such as aviation cargo operations at March Air Reserve Base/March Inland Port.

Existing Truck Routes
The City’s existing truck routes are shown on Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet. This figure shows areas of potential conflict where sensitive receptors, as defined in AB 98 and SB 415 (e.g., schools, parks, care facilities, and residential areas), are located within 1,000 feet of an existing truck routes. As shown in Figure 2, SR 60 and I-215 are part of the federally designated National Network Route. The key segments of the City’s existing truck routes are Perris Boulevard, Alessandro Boulevard, Frederick Street, and Heacock Street, which carry some of the highest truck volumes in the City, with daily truck traffic exceeding approximately 1,300 to 1,600 trucks. Perris 477
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 8 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Boulevard and Heacock Street, particularly north of Alessandro Boulevard, function as key north–south connectors. These segments pass through established residential neighborhoods and areas with a concentration of schools and community facilities, which are considered sensitive receptors. Alessandro Boulevard, which serves as a major east–west corridor, is largely commercial in character; however, segments, particularly east of Heacock Street, interface with residential uses and schools. Frederick Street and portions of Redlands Boulevard exhibit a similar pattern, where commercial uses are interspersed with residential neighborhoods, increasing the potential for conflicts with sensitive receptors.

3.2 Project Description
As discussed in Section 2, Background, of this Addendum, AB 98 and SB 415 require cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive areas. The Project updates the existing truck routes network in the City to better align with the goals of AB 98 and SB 415.

3.2.1 Proposed Truck Routes
The Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes network as shown on Figure 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet. The existing truck routes that will be eliminated as officially designated truck routesfrom the proposed truck routes network are shown in Figure 4, Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, with the elimination of a multitude of existing truck routes, the realignment of others, and the addition of segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR 60, the proposed truck routes network would reduce truck travel activity on local streets and nearby sensitive receptors and shift freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 while prioritizing access to industrial areas that permit logistics warehouse facilities. The proposed truck routes network, as shown in Figure 3, are mainly limited to the portions of Alessandro Boulevard, Cactus Avenue, Perris Boulevard, and several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses.

The World Logistics Center Specific Plan (WLC Specific Plan) includes a circulation network intended to move large vehicles efficiently between the regional highway network and businesses within the Specific Plan Area while directing heavy truck traffic away from nearby residential neighborhoods and other sensitive receptors. Heavy truck traffic associated with the WLC Specific Plan is directed to State Route (SR) 60, Gilman Springs Road, the segment of Redlands Boulevard between SR 60 and Eucalyptus Avenue, and Eucalyptus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and World Logistics Center Parkway. These roadways, together with the WLC Specific Plan Area’s internal roadway network that has yet to be fully constructed, are designated as truck routes within the Specific Plan and will be designated as such on the City’s Truck Routes Map. Development and occupancy of the WLC Specific Plan area are anticipated to occur over the next 10 years.

Due to existing development patterns and limited alternative corridors, complete avoidance of sensitive receptors is not feasible in all locations. As such, the City will implement a combination of mitigation and operational strategies, including signage, buffering, and traffic management measures. The Circulation Element Amendment also indicates that the City will require new logistics developments to prepare truck routing plans consistent with the designated truck routes network, which will be subject to periodic review 478
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 9 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for any necessary updates to respond to land use changes, community concerns, and evolving goods movement patterns.

Truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions may not align with the Project’s proposed truck routes network; however, in such cases (as discussed below), trucks are permitted to utilize non-designated local streets within the City to access the nearest designated truck routes. In addition, trucks serving local commercial and industrial uses will continue to utilize the most direct routes where necessary, as alternative designated routes may not provide feasible access to final destinations. 2 3.2.2 Proposed Policies and Actions
The Project would also revise the policies and actions that support Goal C-6 of the Circulation Element, which directs the City to provide for safe, efficient goods movement by road, air, and rail. The following new actions are proposed to support Goal C-6:
• Maintain and regularly update a publicly accessible Truck Routes Map, including GIS data, to clearly identify designated routes and support enforcement and coordination with regional agencies.
• Require new logistics warehouse developments to be located and designed to minimize reliance on local streets and avoid creating new truck traffic conflicts with sensitive receptors. • Coordinate with Caltrans, neighboring jurisdictions, and regional agencies to align truck routes and minimize the need for trucks servicing logistics warehouse developments to use nondesignated local streets.

Additionally, the Project would revise existing actions outlined in the Circulation Element to maintain internal consistency amongst the other proposed revisions to the Circulation Element, which further define actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided. Together, these revisions incorporate the development and siting standards required by AB 98 and SB 415 and are consistent with the air qualityrelated mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Ordinance. As such, these actions are included to support Goal C-6:
• Avoid routing truck traffic through or adjacent to sensitive land uses to the extent feasible; where avoidance is not feasible due to existing conditions, implement mitigation measures such as buffering, signage, and operational controls.
• Continue to require all new or expanded logistics warehouse developments to comply with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.
2 California Vehicle Code § 35703 mandates that no city may adopt a truck routes ordinance that prohibits "any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained." Moreover, 49 USCS § 31114(a) requires that "[a] State may not enact or enforce a law denying to a commercial motor vehicle subject to this subchapter [49 USCS §§ 31111 et seq.] or subchapter I of this chapter [49 USCS §§ 31101 et seq.] reasonable access between—the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways (except a segment exempted under section 31111(f) or 31113(e) of this title [49 USCS § 31111(f) or 31113(e)]) and other qualifying Federal-aid Primary System highways designated by the Secretary of Transportation; and terminals, facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods carriers, motor carriers of passengers, any towaway trailer transporter combination (as defined in section 31111(a) [49 USCS § 31111(a)]), or any truck tractor-semitrailer combination in which the semitrailer has a length of not more than 28.5 feet and that generally operates as part of a vehicle combination described in section 31111(c) of this title [49 USCS § 31111(c)]." 479
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 10 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

3.3 Project Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in CEQA Statute Section 21067 and is responsible for reviewing and approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. In order to implement the Project, the City would need to take the following discretionary actions:
• Adopt a Resolution Approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR; • Adopt a Resolution Approving the Circulation Element Update; and • Introduce and subsequently Pass/Adopt a Truck Routes Ordinance and a Truck Routes Map containing revisions to the provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and the Mitigation Measures Ordinance negotiated with the California Attorney General’s Office.
480
FIGURE 2-1 REGIONAL LOCATION
MoVal 2040 Revised Draft Program EIR NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 2-1
Regional Location
Map Source: Dyett & Bhatia
Pacific
Ocean

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
Ontario
Fontana
Yucaipa
Chino
Rancho
Cucamonga Highland
Upland
Montclair Pomona Redlands
Chino
Hills
Claremont
Rialto
San
Bermardino
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
Mission Viejo
Lake
Forest
San
Clemente
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano
Dana
Point
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Beach
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
Chino Airport
Ontario International Airport
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Fallbrook Community Airpark
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
10 215
10 60
79 60
83 71
66 66
74 79
76 74 1
73 261
241
133
210 210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation Area
Limestone
Canyon
Regional Park
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
Regional Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
Cucamonga-Guasti Regional Park
San Clemente
State Beach
Doheny
State Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
Chino Hills
State Park
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of Moreno Valley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

FIGURE 2-1
Regional Location
M:\JOBS5\9504\env\graphics\fig2-1.ai 01/21/21 fmm
Map Source: Dyett & Bhatia
Pacific
Ocean

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
Ontario
Fontana
Yucaipa
Chino
Rancho
Cucamonga Highland
Upland
Montclair Pomona Redlands
Chino
Hills
Claremont
Rialto
San
Bermardino
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
MissionViejo
Lake
Forest
San
Clemente
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano
Dana
Point
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Beach
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
Chino Airport
Ontario International Airport
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Fallbrook Community Airpark
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
10 215
10 60
79 60
83 71
66 66
74 79
76 74 1
73 261
241
133
210 210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation
Area
Limestone
Canyon
Regional Park
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
Regional Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
Cucamonga-Guasti Regional Park
San Clemente
State Beach
Doheny
State Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
Chino Hills
State Park
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of MorenoValley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

Regional Location
FIGURE 2-1
fmm

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

DINO COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
tana
Yucaipa
Highland
Redlands
Bermardino
San
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
MissionViejo
Lake
Forest
Clemente
San
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano
a
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Community Airpark Fallbrook
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
215
10 60
79 74
79 76
74 73
261
241
133
210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation
Area
Limestone
Regional Park Canyon
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
onal Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
emente
Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
ark
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of MorenoValley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

N.T.S.

FIGURE 1: Regional Location Map
SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT 481
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from existing Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Existing City Truck Routes
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care
FIGURE 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT 482
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red al nds Blvd
Alessandro Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
60 10
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto Riv

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Remaining Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Remaining Truck Routes
World Logistics Center Specific
Plan Truck Routes
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 Ft from
Remaining Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care

EUCALYPTUS AVE
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. Streets B, E, and F have not been constructed, but will be upon development of the World Logistics Center.

STREET E STREET F

STREET B
FIGURE 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT 483
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
10 Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Existing Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Proposed Existing Truck Route
To Be Eliminated
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care

EUCALYPTUS AVE
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. These truck routes are currently not developed but will be upon completion of World Logistics Center.

FIGURE 4: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT 484
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 15 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 4 2024 REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

SUMMARY
The environmental impact findings of the 2024 RFEIR are summarized below. These findings are also included in the summary table provided at the beginning of each environmental topic area included in Section 5, Environmental Impact Analysis, of this Addendum.

No Impact: The 2024 RFEIR determined that no impact would occur with respect to the following environmental topic areas below.
• Aesthetics (Impact 5.1-a)
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impacts 5.2-c and 5.2-d) • Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-b)
Less Than Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified less than significant impacts in the following environmental topic areas below.
• Aesthetics (Impacts 5.1-a, 5.1-c, and 5.1-d)
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impact 5.2-b)
• Air Quality (Impact 5.3-d)
• Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-d through 5.4-f)
• Energy (Impacts 5.6-a and 5.6-b)
• Geology and Soils (Impacts 5.7-a through 5.7-d)
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Impacts 5.8-a and 5.8-b)
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Impacts 5.9-a through 5.9-g) • Hydrology and Water Quality (Impact 5.10-a through 5.10-e) • Land Use and Planning (Impacts 5.11-a and 5.11-b)
• Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-a)
• Noise (Impacts 5.13-a [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13-b [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13- c)
• Population and Housing (Impacts 5.14-a and 5.14-b)
• Public Services and Recreation (Impacts 5.15-a through 5.15-c) • Transportation (Impacts 5.16-a, 5.16-c, and 5.16-d)
• Utilities and Service Systems (Impacts 5.17-a through 5.17-e) • Wildfire (Impacts 5.18-a through 5.18-d)
485
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 16 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Less Than Significant Impact with Incorporation of Mitigation: The 2024 RFEIR identified impacts that could be mitigated to lessthan significantlevels with incorporation of mitigationmeasuresin the following environmental topic areas below.
• Air Quality (Impact 5.3-c [operation])
• Geology and Soils (Impact 5.7-e)
• Noise (Impact 5.13-b [construction])
Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts with implementation of the Project in following environmental topic areas below. • Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impacts 5.2-a and 5.2-e) • Air Quality (Impacts 5.3-a. 5.3-b, and 5.3-c [construction]) • Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-a through 5.4-c)
• Cultural Resources (Impacts 5.5-a through 5.5-d)
• Noise (Impact 5.13-a [traffic and construction noise]) • Transportation (Impact 5.16-b)
486
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 17 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The scope of the City’s review of the Project is set forth in CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. This review is limited to evaluating the environmental effects associated with the Project when compared to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project as described in the 2024 RFEIR. This Addendum also reviews new information, based on the subsequent review of vested development entitlements, which warrants the need to eliminate and/or realign some existing truck routes,add segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60, and acknowledge that several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses. This new information is of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the 2024 RFEIR was certified. This evaluation includes a determination as to whether the changes proposed for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in any new significant impacts or more severe significant impact.

Although CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 does not stipulate the format or content of an Addendum, the topical areas evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR were used as guidance for this Addendum. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) states that “A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the Project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.” This comparative analysis provides the City with the factual basis for determining whether any changes to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, any changes in circumstances, or any new information since the 2024 RFEIR was certified would require additional environmental review or preparation of a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City has determined, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that implementation of the Project does not propose substantial changes from what was studied and reviewed for the 2024 RFEIR, no substantial changes in circumstances would occur which would require major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information of substantial importance has been revealed since the certification of 2024 RFEIR that would result in either new significant effects or an increase in the severity of previously analyzed significant effects.

Again, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was adopted as a part of the 2024 RFEIR that minimized impacts associated with the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. The relevant and previously adopted 2024 RFEIR MMRP will be imposed as conditions of the Project. The MMRP is contained in Appendix A.
487
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 18 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.1 Aesthetics
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

Environmental Issue Area
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
Highway?
No Impact No No No None
c) If in a non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of the
site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the
project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic
quality?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.1.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
In summary, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that impacts regarding scenic vistas, visual character, and glare impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. There would be no impact regarding scenic resources within a State scenic highway because there are no State-designated or eligible scenic highways within the Planning Area for the 2024 RFEIR. Compliance with local plans; the City’s Municipal Code, requiring standard design measures as well as lighting and landscaping requirements; Title 24 of the California Building Standards Code, which serves as the basis for the design and construction of buildings in California; and the 2024 GPU policies would be required for future development under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Therefore, with consistency with all relevant regulations, impacts related to aesthetics would be less than significant.
488
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 19 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.1.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Threshold (b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? Threshold (c) Would the project, if in a non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Threshold (d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact
According to the 2024 RFEIR, impacts regarding scenic vistas, visual character, and glare impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact scenic vistas, visual character, or glare.

No aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to aesthetics, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR:

No mitigation measures are required.
489
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 20 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.1.3 Conclusion
The Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to aesthetics than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. No new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant aesthetics impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.
490
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 21 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Will the Project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland or Farmland
of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None
b) Conflict with existing zoning
for agricultural use or a
Williamson Act contract?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Conflict with existing zoning
for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
No impact No No No None
d) Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
No impact No No No None
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which,
due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural
use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None
491
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 22 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would impact Prime Farmland and Farmland of Local Importance within the proposed Concept Areas. The 2024 RFEIR determined that the continued development of properties under the land use designations that would remain unchanged would also have the potential to convert additional land designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance or Unique Farmland to non-farming uses. Although the conversion of Farmland was anticipated and evaluated under the general plan prior to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, the 2006 General Plan EIR, some vacant Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program designations remain that could be converted to non-agricultural uses, which would be considered significant.

The 2024 RFEIR determined that there would be no conflicts with agricultural zoning as the City does not have any exclusive agricultural zones and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project does not include any rezoning.

Additionally, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project did not propose any land use changes within or adjacent to any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, impacts related to agricultural zoning and Williamson Act Contracts would be less than significant. Additionally, no impacts would occur in regard to forest zoning and forest land.

Lastly, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would intensify uses within the Planning Area in a manner that would reduce the feasibility of agricultural production.

Furthermore, the continued development of land under the land use designations that would remain unchanged could also indirectly affect the feasibility of agricultural production through continued urbanization. Therefore, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would potentially result in indirect conversion of potential farmland resources to non-agricultural uses, which would be considered a significant impact.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No feasible mitigation is identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.2.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Threshold (b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
Threshold (c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
Threshold (d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use? 492
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 23 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Threshold (e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

According to the 2024 RFEIR, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would impact Prime Farmland and Farmland of Local Importance within the Planning Area. Implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project does not propose any land use changes within or adjacent to a Williamson Act Contract.

Therefore, impacts related to agricultural zoning and Williamson Act Contracts would be less than significant. The City also does not possess any zoning classifications for forestland, timberland, or timberland production zones, nor does the Planning Area possess any forestland. Future development could accelerate the conversion of agricultural land. Implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would intensify uses within the Planning Area in a manner that would further reduce the feasibility of agricultural production. Furthermore, the continued development of land under the land use designations that would remain unchanged could also indirectly affect the feasibility of agricultural production through urbanization due to the introduction of a higher intensity land use.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact land within or adjacent to any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract; would not impact forest zoning or forest land; and would not affect the feasibility of agricultural production.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.
493
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 24 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2.3 Conclusion
The Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. No new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant agriculture and forestry resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 494
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 25 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.3 Air Quality
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue
Areas
Conclusion in
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Will the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Significant and
unavoidable No No No
MM AQ-1
through
MM AQ-5d
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is
non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard?
Significant and
unavoidable No No No
MM AQ-1
MM AQ-2
MM AQ-3
c) Expose sensitive
receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
Significant and
unavoidable
(construction);
Less than
significant with
mitigation
incorporated
(operation)
No No No
MM AQ-4
MM AQ-5a
MM AQ-5b
MM AQ-5c
MM AQ-5d
d) Result in other
emissions (such as those
leading to odors)
adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.3.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the buildout under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because it would increase vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per service population when compared to existing conditions, resulting in significant and unavoidable transportation impacts related to VMT. However, at a programmatic level of analysis, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce air quality impacts associated with development facilitated by the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. As such, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the AQMP, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The 2024 RFEIR also determined that construction and operations associated with future development that would be accommodated under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project could generate both short-term (construction) and long-term (operations) emissions in excess of the South Coast Air Quality Management 495
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 26 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report District’s (SCAQMD) threshold criteria. For short-term emissions, implementing MM AQ-1 through MM AQ-5 and complying with the 2024 GPU goals and policies would reduce construction-related air pollutant emissions. However, individual projects could implement these mitigation measures and still exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds. Therefore, the 2024 RFEIR construction-related regional air quality impacts of developments that would be accommodated by the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would remain significant and unavoidable. For long-term operations, MM AQ-5, in addition to the 2024 GPU goals and policies, would reduce air pollutant emissions. The conditions and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants within the City. However, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

Similarly, localized construction and operational emissions associated with future development could exceed the SCAQMD’s localized significance thresholds (LST) and health risk thresholds. Cumulative development within the City would exceed the regional significance thresholds; therefore, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) until the attainment standards are met in the Basin. As such, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that the regional air quality would remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation implemented. MM AQ-5 would also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation-related criteria air pollutant emissions to the extent logistically and technologically feasible. However, because existing sensitive receptors may be near construction activities and large emitters of on-site operationrelated criteria air pollutant emissions generated by individual development projects accommodated by the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, construction and operation emissions generated by such projects have the potential to exceed SCAQMD’s LSTs. Overall, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Regarding health risk, implementation of MM AQ-5 also has the potential to reduce construction and operational health risk; however, construction and operation health risk generated by projects under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would still have the potential to exceed SCAQMD’s health risk. Overall, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable for construction risk and less than significant with mitigation for operational health risk.

Regarding odor, the 2024 RFEIR found that impacts related to construction and operational odor impacts would be less than significant with compliance with 2024 GPU policies and SCAQMD Rules 402 and 1113.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
At a programmatic level of analysis, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce air quality impacts associated with development facilitated by the 2024 GPU. Future construction and operational emissions would conflict with implementation of the AQMP. Impacts remain significant and unavoidable.

MM AQ-1 Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have construction and operational air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the air quality impact analysis shall be included in the development project’s CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis shall 496
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 27 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report incorporate SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts to the greatest extent feasible.

MM AQ-2 Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed applicable thresholds shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable. The measures shall be included as notes on the grading and/or demolition plans:
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excess amounts of dust. • Pre-grading/excavation activities shall include watering the area to be graded or excavated before commencement of grading or excavation operations.

Application of watering (preferably reclaimed water, if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities. This measure can achieve PM10 reductions of 61 percent through application of water every three hours to disturbed areas.
• Fugitive dust produced during grading, excavation, and construction activities shall be controlled by the following activities: To reduce energy demand associated with potable water conveyance, future projects shall implement the following, as applicable:
o All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Section 23114. Covering loads and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches can reduce PM10 emissions by 91 percent.
o All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways, shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering at not less than three hourintervals, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate.

Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Application of water every three hours to disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 61 percent. • Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site shall be monitored at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods, such as water and roll-compaction, and environmentally safe dust control materials, shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. If no further grading or excavation operations are planned for the area, the area shall be seeded and watered 497
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 28 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report until grass growth is evident, or periodically treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. Replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 5 percent. • Signs shall be posted on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. This measure can reduce associated PM10 emissions by 57 percent. • During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties; instantaneous wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour), all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations shall be curtailed to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by onsite activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard off-site or onsite. The site superintendent/supervisor shall use his/her discretion in conjunction with SCAQMD when winds are excessive (above 25 miles per hour).
• Adjacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads.
• Personnel involved in grading operations, including contractors and subcontractors, shall be required to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations.

MM AQ-3 Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable thresholds, shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by the SCAQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to:
• Construction haul truck operators for demolition debris and import/export of soil shall use trucks that meet CARB’s 2020 engine emissions standards of

0.01 grams per brake horsepower hour of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 grams per brake horsepower-hour of NOx emissions. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards and shall provide these records prior to grading permit issuance to the City. • Construction vehicle idling shall be limited to five minutes as set forth in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Signs shall be posted in areas where they will be seen by vehicle operators stating idling time limits. This requirement shall be included on the plans. • Construction contractors shall utilize construction equipment that uses low polluting fuels (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) to the extent that they are available and feasible to use.

This requirement shall be included on the plans.
498
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 29 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report • Heavy duty diesel-fueled equipment shall use low NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall use electricity from power poles rather than temporary gasoline or diesel-powered generators, as technically and logistically feasible, or solar where available. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall maintain construction equipment in good, properly tuned operating condition, as specified by the manufacturer, to minimize exhaust emissions. Documentation demonstrating that the equipment has been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications shall be shared with the City prior to grading permit issuance. • Construction contractors shall reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas, as technically and logistically feasible. This requirement shall be included on the plans.

MM AQ-4 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Localized Significance Threshold analysis shall be prepared for construction and operations. If the LST analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution reduction measures shall be implemented to ensure that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded.

MM AQ-5a A project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be conducted for future development projects that would generate toxic air contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. Consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 98 and Senate Bill (SB) 415, logistics use facility projects within 900 feet of sensitive receptors to shall conduct an operational HRA. The HRA shall evaluate a project when unmitigated emissions are expected to meet or exceed per the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds:
• Carcinogens: Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 10 in one million. For cumulative cancer risk, the maximum exposed individual risk equals or exceeds significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. • Non‐Carcinogens: Emit toxic contaminants that equal or exceed 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

If projects are found to exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds, mitigation, including but not limited to requiring heavy-duty trucks, forklifts and/or yard trucks to be zero-emission, forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes, installing photo-voltaic systems, running conduit for future electric truck charging, requiring all stand-by generators to be non-diesel, designing to LEED green building certifications, and improving vegetation and tree canopy for shade, shall be incorporated to reduce impacts 499
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 30 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report to below SCAQMD thresholds. The HRA shall be submitted to the City Planning Department to demonstrate that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded prior to issuance of building permits for any future discretionary residential or residential mixeduse project.

MM AQ-5b The City of Moreno Valley shall create an abatement fund to subsidize air filtration and/or Heating, Ventilation, Air Condition (HVAC) systems for residents within 1,000 feet of the property line of any logistics use facility projects or within 1,000 feet of a dedicated truck routes, thereby abating air quality impacts for the most impacted sensitive receptors. The City of Moreno Valley may choose to administer the abatement fund or designate its administration to a third party which will require an additional 10 percent administrative fee. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all logistics use facility project applicants shall pay a one-time fee of $1,500 for each daily truck trip the logistics use facility project is estimated to induce.

MM AQ-5c All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following design and construction requirements shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall be located at least 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors.
• All logistics use facility projects shall include a solid wall and/or a landscaped berm of at least 15 feet in height, separating the project and nearby sensitive receptors.
• All logisticfacility projects shall ensure that the project parking lots have at least 35 percent of the tree shade cover within 15 years of commencement of operations.
• All logistics use facility projects shall make at least 25 percent of passenger car vehicle parking electric vehicle (EV)-ready, with at least 15 percent of passenger parking spots equipped with Level 2 chargers. • All logistics use facility projects shall be equipped with EV ready conduits at each truck door or parking spot to support an EV charger and at least 50 percent of these shall be installed with fast chargers. • All logistics use facility projects that include refrigerated storage shall provide fully functional transportation refrigeration unit (TRU) plug-ins or similar electrical hookups at all truck loading bays or dock doors. • All logistics use facility projects totaling over 400,000 square feet in total footprint shall maintain a lounge for truck operators with amenities including restrooms, vending machines, and air conditioning.
• All construction equipment, including smaller equipment (such as hand tools and power washers), shall be zero emission if feasible and commercially available within the State of California. If it is not feasible to utilize zero500 Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 31 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report emission construction equipment, or such equipment is not commercially available within the State of California, all such construction equipment shall meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 4 certification and lowpolluting fuels (e.g., low NOx diesel). • All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during construction except for emergencies.
• The idling of all construction equipment and construction related vehicles shall be limited to three (3) minutes. • Grading and earthmoving activities shall be prohibited on days with an Air Quality Index (AQI) greater than 100.

MM AQ-5d All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following operational measures shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall utilize trucks with a minimum 2014 model year by 2027.
• All logistics use facility projects shall use 100 percent zero emission vehicles (ZEV) for forklifts, yard trucks, and other on site equipment. • All logistics use facility projects shall have signage noting a three (3)-minute idling limit and shall provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-complaint call-in line to submit idling complaints. • All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during operation except for emergencies.
• All logistics use facility projects shall provide workers with secure bicycle storage facilities with outlets for electric bicycles and on-site meals or lunch shuttle programs.
• All logistics use facility projects shall also provide workers with transit route information and incentives to carpool, such as dedicated carpool parking spaces.
• All logistics use facility projects shall implement training programs for managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to minimize truck queuing and idling.

5.3.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the AQMP and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not 501
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 32 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations, which would conflict with or obstruct the implementation of an applicable air quality plan.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The truck routes modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to air quality. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. As described in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment of this Addendum, the modification of the truck routes would result in a VMT increase of approximately 2.8 percent and an increase of mobile source emissions of criteria pollutants of less than 1 percent due to the minor increase in VMT. 3 Neither increase
is considered substantial because the shifting of truck trips would decrease the incremental carcinogenic risk for the majority of sensitive receptors. A few receptors areas may have incremental higher risk; however, such risk would remain below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 10 in one million incremental thresholds. The increase in emissions is negligible in magnitude and does not result in a new or more severe impact. Impacts related to operational air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the conclusions in the 2024 RFEIR.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on an applicable air quality plan, such impacts would continue to be significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
3 While the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR), now referred to as the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, guidance does not characterize truck trips as “automobiles” subject to VMT analysis under CEQA. As such, the VMT analysis for truck contained in this addendum is provided for informational purposes. Refer to the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, dated December 2018, for more information.
502
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 33 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report As discussed in the 2024 RFEIR, future development resulting from the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in air pollutant emissions generated during construction activities. Similarly, operations of future development projects under implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in emissions of area sources (e.g., consumer products, architectural coating, and landscape equipment), energy sources (i.e., natural gas usage for space and water heating and cooking), and mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicles from vehicle trips generated by implementation of the proposed Project).

Although no specific development projects are proposed as part of the Project, future development operational emissions would be associated with area sources, energy sources, and mobile sources.

As detailed in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment, modification of the proposed truck routes would result in a minor increase in mobile source emissions due to the small VMT increase with the shifting of truck trips. Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)1 presents the criteria air pollutant emissions for the Without Project Scenario (2024 GPU) (current truck routes) and With Project Scenario (proposed truck routes modifications) in the year 2040.

Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)1 Source
Maximum Pounds Per Day2
VOC NOX CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Without Project Scenario 2,748 2,936 27,936 78 6,069 1,552 With Project Scenario (EMFAC2025) 2,748 2,942 27,938 78 6,074 1,554 Net Increase <1 6 2 <1 5 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.2% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
With Project Scenario (EMFAC2021
with adjustment factors) 2,748 2,957 27,938 78 6,075 1,554 Net Increase <1 21 2 <1 6 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.7% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds; NOX = Nitrogen Oxides; CO = Carbon Monoxide; SOx = Sulfur Dioxide; PM10 = Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less; PM2.5 = Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less.

1. The mobile emissions include brake wear, tire wear, re-entrained road dust and vehicle exhaust.

2. Total emissions may be off due to rounding.

Refer to Appendix B for modeling results.

As shown in Table 1, the With Project Scenario would increase mobile emissions of some criteria pollutants by 0.1 to 0.7 percent using EMFAC2025 or EMFAC2021 with adjustment factors. These minor increases are not considered substantial since any increase in emissions would be negligible in magnitude and would not have a new or more severe impact. Therefore, impacts related to operational air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the conclusions in the 2024 RFEIR.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to 503
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 34 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Sine Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, such impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? No New or More Severe Significant Impact
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts for construction and less than significant with mitigation incorporated during operations. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes network and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Moreover, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way, there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

As described in Appendix B, the truck routes modifications proposed by the Project would change the number of truck trips along the studied roadway segments, which in turn will change the carcinogenic risk assessment, cancer burden, and chronic hazard assessment. The majority of the receptors surrounding said segments will see a reduction incremental carcinogenic risk. However, while a few receptors may be exposed to any incremental higher risk on the order of 0.04 to 2.88 in one million, the risk would remain below SCAQMD 10 in one million incremental thresholds, which is not considered substantial.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified. 504
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 35 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in lessthan-significant impacts, including emissions of odors, affecting a substantial number of people. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, which would result in other emissions, such as those leading to odors. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to odors. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. In summary, the proposed revised truck routes network would shift truck trips farther away from the majority of sensitive receptors and closer to smaller sensitive receptor populations. Therefore, the net impact of potential odors from trucks would be reduced, and the Project would not result in emissions (such as those leading to odors) that would adversely affect a substantial number of people.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on other emissions that would lead to odors, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.
505
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 36 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.3.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to air quality than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant air quality impacts than were previously analyzed; as such, no further environmental evaluation is required. 506
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 37 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.4 Biological Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Will the Project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
MM BIO-2
b) Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural
community identified in local
or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
c) Have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally
protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
d) Interfere substantially with
the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
Less than
significant No No No None
507
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 38 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report f) Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.4.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have the potential to directly or indirectly impact candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters. However, implementation of MM BIO-1 and MM BIO-2 would reduce impacts on sensitive and special status species and sensitive riparian habitats. Mitigation would be provided on a project-by-project basis. Therefore, impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters would remain significant and unavoidable. The 2024 RFEIR determined that buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have less than significant impacts on wildfire corridors, local policies and ordinances, and the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM BIO-1 would require a site-specific biology survey for sites with the potential for sensitive biological resources to be present. This survey would occur at the time future projects are proposed, based on sitespecific conditions at the time of application. The measures provide a framework for future development consistent with the 2024 GPU to reduce potentially significant impacts to the extent feasible.

MM BIO-1 Applications for future development of vacant properties (and portions thereof), wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to sensitive biological resources, shall be required to prepare a sitespecific general biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources, including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated wetlands or waters. If potentially significant impacts to sensitive biological resources, including sensitive species and/or wetlands are identified, the report shall also recommend appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance.

MM BIO-2 Applications for future development, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to mature trees and/or native vegetation suitable for nesting birds, shall be required to restrict removal of sensitive habitat and vegetation to outside the breeding seasons of any sensitive species identified within adjacent properties (typical bird breeding season is February 1– September 1. as early as January 1 for some raptors). If vegetation clearing must begin during the breeding season, a qualified biologist shall provide recommendations to avoid 508
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 39 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report impacts to nesting birds which typically includes a pre-construction survey within 3 days of the start of construction to determine the presence of active nests.

If active nests are found, avoidance measures shall be implemented to ensure protection of the nesting birds. Avoidance measures may include a no-activity buffer zone, typically 300 feet from the area of disturbance or 500 feet for raptors, established at the discretion of the qualified biologist in consultation with the City, If activity buffer zones are not feasible, temporary noise barriers may be installed to attenuate construction noise. Noise wall height and adequacy shall be supported by a noise analysis to determine the anticipated construction noise levels with attenuation measures as recommended by the biologist and approved by the City. Periodic noise monitoring shall be conducted during construction to ensure noise attenuation standards are met. Accepted noise levels are species dependent and existing ambient noise levels can play a factor in establishing baseline acceptable noise.

5.4.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species were significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to biological resources, the Project would not impact any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species, such impacts would be less than significant.
509
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 40 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Applicable Mitigation Measures from the REFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415.

The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to riparian habitats since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found there would be significant and unavoidable impacts to federally protected wetlands. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck 510
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 41 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to federally protected wetlands, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wetlands, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that buildout of the 2024 GPU would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor, and impacts would be less than significant.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to a migratory wildlife corridor, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).
511
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 42 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wildlife corridors, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and Threshold (f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts would be less than significant regarding wildlife policies, ordinances, or plans. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs regarding specific biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and would not conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. The Project would comply with 2024 GPU policies that support the protection of biologically significant habitats where practical, including the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, riparian areas, habitats of rare and endangered species, and other areas of natural significance.

Moreover, the Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to or be located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Conserved Lands, Criteria Cells, or Public/Quasi Public Lands since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
512
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 43 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on local policies or ordinances or the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.4.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to biological resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant biological resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 513
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 44 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-1
b) Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5? Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No
MM CUL-2
MM CUL-3
MM CUL-4
MM CUL-5
MM CUL-6
MM CUL-7
MM CUL-8
MM CUL-9
c) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-10
MM CUL-11
d) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in
PRC Section 21074 as either a
site, features, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native
American Tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing
in the CRHR, or in a local
register or
ii) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to
criteria set form in
subdivision c of PRC Section
5024.1?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-1
MM CUL-11

5.5.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined that impacts from future development would have the potential to result in a substantial adverse effect on historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal 514
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 45 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report cultural resources, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Implementation of MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM CUL-3, MM CUL-4, MM CUL-5, MM CUL-6, MM CUL-7, MM CUL-8, MM CUL-9, MM CUL-10, and MM CUL-11 would reduce impacts to historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future development site-specific project that would directly or indirectly affect a building/structure in excess of 50 years of age, the City or a qualified architectural historian shall determine whether the affected building/structure is historically significant. The evaluation shall be based on criteria such as age, location, context, association with an important person or event, uniqueness, or structural integrity, as indicated in the CEQA Guidelines. If the evaluation determines that building/structure is not historic, no further evaluation or mitigation would be required.

If the building/structure is determined to be historically significant, the preferred mitigation would be to avoid the resource through project redesign. If the resource cannot be avoided, all prudent and feasible measures to minimize or mitigate harm to the resource shall be taken per recommendations of the qualified architectural historian..

MM CUL-2 Prior to issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project that would potentially have a direct or indirect affect an archaeological resource, the City shall require the following steps be taken to determine: (1) the presence of archaeological resources, and (2) the appropriate mitigation for any significant resources which may be impacted by project development. The following steps would help determine the presence or absence of archaeological resources.

Step 1: An archaeologist shall conduct records and background research at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) for a list of recorded resources and request a sacred lands file search from the Native American Heritage Commission.

Step 2: After review of this data, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist.

Step 3: If through the research and the field survey, archaeological resources are identified, then an evaluation of significance shall be completed by a qualified archaeologist. The evaluation program generally will include excavation to determine depth, extent, integrity, and content of the subsurface cultural material.

Step 4: The results of the excavation will be evaluated using the Thresholds above in Section 4.5.4.

Step 5: If an archaeological resource is determined significant and avoidance through project redesign is not feasible, a data recovery and construction monitoring program must be implemented to reduce the impacts the archaeological resource to below a significant level. The data recovery program must be approved by the City.

Step 6: A final data recovery and/monitoring report shall be completed in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports: Recommended Content and Format. Confidential attachments must be submitted under separate covers. Artifacts collected during the evaluation and data recovery phases must be curated at an appropriate facility consistent with state (California State Historic Resources Commission’s 515
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 46 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Guidelines for Curation of Archaeological Collection 1993) and federal curation standards (36 CFR 79 of the Federal Register) and that allows access to artifact collections.

MM CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project developer shall retain a professional archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), at no cost to the City, to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the respective project. The Project Archaeologist shall be authorized to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), which have requested monitoring, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) as defined in CUL-5. The Project Archeologist shall attend all pre-grading meetings with the City, the project’s construction manager, the project’s general contractor and the pertinent contractors. In addition, the Project’s Archaeologist shall provide and conduct Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training, which the project’s construction manager, general contractor, and all pertinent subcontracts shall be required to attend. In addition, to the Project Archaeologist, the designated archaeological monitor for the respective project shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

MM CUL-4 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project Developer shall secure agreements with the Consulting Tribe(s). The project developer shall provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance notice to the tribes of all ground-disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Native American Monitor(s) shall be invited to attend all pre-grading meetings with the Project Archaeologist, the City, the construction manager, and general contractor, and any pertinent subcontractors and conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

MM CUL-5 The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the project’s construction manager and general contractor, and the City shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

MM CUL-6 In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation-In-place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no grading or construction activities commencing that may potentially affect or otherwise impact the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-3. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in CUL-5 The location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file with the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

MM CUL-7 The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan of any future site-specific project: “If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground–disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find.

MM CUL-8 If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at any future site-specific project that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, all ground-disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the 517
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 48 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologists and Tribal Monitors if needed.

Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in CUL-4 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

MM CUL-9 Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) at the San Diego State University (SDSU) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to each of the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

MM CUL-10 If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to if the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains. (PRC Section 5097.98). (GP Objective 23.3, CEQA). No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the consulting Tribe[s].

MM CUL-11 It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).
518
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 49 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.5.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant Section 15064.5?
Threshold (b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Threshold (c) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change to the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 (site/feature/place/landscape/sacred place of object) that holds cultural or religious value to a California Native American Tribe?
Threshold (d) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in PRC Section 21074 as either a site, features, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or in a local register or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set form in subdivision c of PRC Section 5024.1?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources to be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways that would impact historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources. Additionally, the Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to cultural resources and Tribal cultural resources. The proposed revisions to the Circulation Element would not conflict with the implementation of these General Plan goals, policies, or actions or the 2024 RFEIR mitigation measures.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
519
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 50 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.5.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to cultural resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant cultural resources and Tribal cultural resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 520
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 51 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.6 Energy
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Result in a potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operations?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Conflict with or obstruct a
state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.6.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined that impacts to energy would be less than significant. Specifically, the 2024 RFEIR confirmed that impacts to energy consumption would be less than significant as there are no unusual characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Therefore, it is expected that construction fuel consumption associated with implementation of the Project would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar projects of this nature. Therefore, impacts to energy resources associated with the future developments’ construction activities would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Future development projects under implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would permanently increase the operational energy demand when compared to existing conditions; however, impacts to energy consumption during Project operations would be less than significant.

Buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in increased consumption of energy; however future development would be required to at minimum to meet the mandatory energy requirements of CALGreen and the California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6 of the CCR) in effect at the time of development, and would benefit from the efficiencies associated with these regulations as they relate to building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) mechanical systems, water heating systems, and lighting.

Additionally, the 2024 CAP includes a number of GHG reduction goals related to energy use and energy conservation. Therefore, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not create a land use pattern that would result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of building-related energy, and impacts would be less than significant.

Future development would be required at a minimum to meet the mandatory energy requirements of CALGreen and the California Energy Code in effect at the time of development. Therefore, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of CALGreen and California Energy Code, or with Southern California Edison’s (SCE) and Moreno Valley Electric Utility’s 521
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 52 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (MVU) implementation of California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.6.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, and
Threshold (b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to energy to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, which would increase energy consumption. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to energy use and energy conservation. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. Therefore, the Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during Project operations.

As previously discussed, the Project would result in a net increase in Citywide Truck VMT by approximately

2.8 percent. Assuming similar vehicle fleet characteristics and operating conditions, the increase in VMT would be expected to result in a corresponding increase in fuel consumption. Therefore, the Project change would marginally increase regional fuel use; however, this increase would be negligible in magnitude and would not result in new or more severe impacts.

Additionally, the Project revises existing actions in the City’s Circulation Element, further defining actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided, consistent with the Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measure Ordinance. Therefore, the Project would not result in site specific development or wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources and would not conflict with a state or local plan for renewable energy.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to 522
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 53 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on energy, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.6.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to energy than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant energy impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.
523
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 54 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.7 Geology and Soils
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion in
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
(i) Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for
the area or based on
other substantial
evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division
of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
(ii) Strong seismic ground
shaking?
(iii) Seismic-related ground
failure, including
liquefaction?
(iv) Landslides?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Be located on a geologic unit
or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a
result of the project, and
potentially result in on-site or
off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Be located on expansive soil,
as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature?
Less than
significant
with
No No No MM PAL-1
524
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 55 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report mitigation
incorporated

5.7.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in less than significant impacts to seismic ground shaking and seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, substantial soil erosion, or the loss of topsoil, on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse, and expansive soils. The 2024 RFEIR concluded that impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant with implementation of MM PAL-1.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM PAL-1: Applications for future development, wherein the Community Development Director or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to paleontological resources, shall review the underlying geology and paleontological sensitivity of the site. If it is determined that the potential exists that sensitive paleontological resources are present, the applicant shall be required to comply with the following mitigation framework.

A qualified paleontological monitor shall be present during grading in project areas where a project specific geological technical study has determined that such monitoring is necessary due to the potential for paleontological resources to reside within the underlying geologic formations. The geologic technical study shall also provide specific duties of the monitor, and detailed measures to address fossil remains, if found.

5.7.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss, injury, or death involving:
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
(ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
(iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (iv) Landslides?
Threshold (b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Threshold (c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Threshold (d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
525
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 56 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to geological hazards, including seismic hazards and unstable geology, expansive soils, and soil erosion to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies specific to geology and soils. As such, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rapture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction or landslides. In addition, the Project would not result in substantial soil erosion. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on geological hazards, including seismic hazards and unstable geology, expansive soils, and soil erosion, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (e) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to paleontological resources to be potentially significant. However, implementation of MM PAL-1 would reduce impacts to paleontological resources and unique geology to less than significant levels. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes and policies and actions to the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies specific to unique paleontological resources. As such, the Project would not directly or indirectly cause impacts to unique paleontological resources.
526
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 57 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.7.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to geology and soils than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant geology and soils and paleontological resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 527
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 58 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section Environmental Issue
Areas
Conclusion
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Generate greenhouse
gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that
may have a significant
impact on the
environment?
Less than
significant No No No MM GHG-1 MM GHG-2
b) Conflict with an
applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse
gases?
Less than
significant No No No MM GHG-1 MM GHG-2

5.8.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined that the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project is on track to meet SB 32 (40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030) but not on track to meet AB 1279 (net neutrality by 2045) target goals for 2030 or 2045. Therefore, GHG emissions would be less than significant with implementation of MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2. According to the 2024 RFEIR, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions such as AB 1279 and CARB 2022 Scoping Plan. The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would however be consistent with SB

32. Therefore, consistency with applicable GHG plans is potentially significant with implementation of MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
GHG-1: The City of Moreno Valley shall monitor implementation of the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and update and maintain the CAP monitoring schedule, adding or enhancing Actions and Measures to achieve City of Moreno Valley-specific reductions targets in line with Senate Bill (SB) 32 (2016) and Assembly Bill (AB) 1279 (2022). Specifically, the City shall:
a) Monitor continuously and report annually on CAP implementation activities. The annual monitoring report shall include the implementation status of each Action and Measure b) Calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions annually and monitor progress towards achieving the performance targets of each Action and Measure c) Update the community-wide GHG emissions inventories and targets aligned with SB 32 and AB 1279 every two to three years, in alignment with the five-year cycle specified below
d) Prepare and adopt a fully updated CAP starting in 2029, and adopted by 2030, and every 528
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 59 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report five years thereafter as needed if the inventories are showing the City of Moreno Valley is not on track to achieve the 2045 targets.
e) Adopt Actions and Measures to close any “reduction gaps” between the updated inventories and applicable 2040 and 2045 targets no later than December 31, 2030 f) Create, enhance, expand, or replace Actions and Measures, as new technologies and programs emerge that warrant inclusion in the CAP
GHG-2: For each discretionary project subject to and not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant shall:
a) Complete the City’s GHG Emissions Analysis Compliance Checklist to assist with determining project consistency with the Moreno Valley CAP, with the exception of logistics use facility projects that are not permitted to utilize the Checklist for CEQA streamlining, and
b) Incorporate appropriate GHG reduction measures to achieve their proportion of GHG emission reductions consistent with the assumptions of the CAP, and c) Document the infeasibility or inapplicability of CAP measures, and d) Propose alternative GHG reduction measures, as appropriate; or e) Demonstrate through a quantitative analysis that the project would not impede (or would facilitate) Moreno Valley’s ability to meet the GHG emissions reduction targets.

Because GHG emissions from industrial land uses were excluded from the CAP, applicants of projects that include industrial uses must establish, with substantial evidence.

5.8.1 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

According to the 2024 RFEIR, future development associated with the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project is expected to result in increased GHG emissions, largely due to increased VMT, as well as stationary area sources, energy consumption, water supply, and solid waste generation. The 2024 RFEIR concludes that the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project is on track to meet SB 32 (40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030) but not on track to meet AB 1279 (net neutrality by 2045) target goals for 2030 or 2045. Therefore, impacts on GHG emissions would be potentially significant. With implementation of MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2, similar to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, impacts would be reduced to less than significant.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, which would significantly increase GHG emissions. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to GHG emissions. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local 529
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 60 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas.

Additionally, as previously discussed, the Project would result in a net increase in Citywide Truck VMT by approximately 2.8 percent. Because GHG emissions from on-road vehicles are generally correlated with the amount of vehicle travel, the increase in VMT would result in a corresponding increase in transportation-related GHG emissions. Therefore, the project change would be expected to cause a minor increase in GHG emissions as vehicles travel a greater total distance. However, this increase would be negligible in magnitude and would not result in new or more severe impacts.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on GHG emissions, such impacts would remain less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2.

Threshold (b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG to be less than significant with implementation of MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, which would conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to GHG emissions. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas.

The Project revises existing actions in the City’s Circulation Element, further defining actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided and reflecting the City’s approval of the Logistics Facilities 530
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 61 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measure Ordinance. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

Project implementation would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on an applicable plan, policy, or regulation. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant with implementation of MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM GHG-1 and MM GHG-2.

5.8.2 Conclusion
Since the Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to GHG emissions than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant GHG emissions impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 531
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 62 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment
through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing
or proposed school?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) For a project located within
an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use
airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive
noise for people residing or
working in the project area?
Less than
significant No No No None
f) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Less than
significant No No No None
g) Expose people or structures,
either directly or indirectly, to a
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
Less than
significant No No No None
532
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 63 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.9.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
In summary, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not result in significant impacts relative to hazardous materials. There would be less than significant impacts to routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and release of hazardous materials, as future development would be required to adhere to federal, state, county, and local regulations relating to the use, storage, handling, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials and contamination would reduce the potential risk of hazardous materials exposure to a less than significant level. Additionally, adherence with applicable federal, state, regional, and local plans and regulations, as well as 2024 GPU policies, would ensure that future development would not result in an accidental release of hazardous materials or emissions of hazardous substance near existing or proposed schools, and impacts would be less than significant. Adherence to applicable clean-up and/or remediation requirements and regulations would ensure that future development under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not create a significant hazard associated with known hazardous materials sites, and impacts would be less than significant.

Furthermore, adherence to applicable federal, state, regional, and local plans and regulations as well as the 2024 GPU policies would ensure that impacts to airport hazards, emergency response, and wildfires would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.9.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Threshold (b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Threshold (c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Threshold (d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Threshold (e) Would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport? Threshold (f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Threshold (g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? 533
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 64 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report No New or More Severe Significant Impact: According to the 2024 RFEIR, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in less than significant impacts regarding hazards and hazardous materials. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to hazards and hazardous materials. Furthermore, site included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 are associated with specific development properties; there are no public rights-of-way identified on the Cortese list.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on hazards or hazardous materials, such impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.9.3 Conclusion
Since the Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant hazard and hazardous materials impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.
534
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 65 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
groundwater quality?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater
recharge such the project may
impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
(i) result in substantial erosion
or siltation on-site or offsite?
(ii) substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding onsite or off-site?
(iii) create or contribute runoff
water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
or,
(iv) impede or redirect flood
flows?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Less than
significant No No No None
535
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 66 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.10.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
In summary, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that impacts regarding hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. The 2024 RFEIR determined that future developments would be required to adhere to applicable rules, relevant plans and programs. Pursuant to the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB-SAR) and Municipal Code requirements would ensure that future development would not violate water quality standards or degrade surface or ground water quality, and construction-related impacts. Additionally, pursuant to Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.10, future development would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and demonstrate compliance with the City’s MS4 Permit and to minimize the release of potential waterborne pollutants. Future developments would be required to adhere to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Open Space and Resource Conservation (OSRC) Element, which includes the goal to minimize water pollution and policies. Therefore, adherence to relevant plans would ensure that future development would not violate any water quality standards or degrade surface or ground water quality, and operational impacts would be less than significant.

The 2024 RFEIR determined that adherence to applicable 2024 GPU policies would ensure that future development would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, result in substantial erosion or siltation, increase surface runoff, and exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. Future development would also be required to adhere to regional and local plans, programs, and regulations relating to storm water runoff and volume flow. and impacts would be less than significant. Furthermore, the 2024 RFEIR determined that future development would not result in risks associated with flooding and would be less than significant.

Therefore, the 2024 RFEIR determined that the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not result in significant impacts relative to hydrology and water quality, and no mitigation is necessary to reduce potential impacts.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.10.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Threshold (b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
(i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on-site or off-site? (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-site or off-site?
536
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 67 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? or, impede or redirect flood flows?
Threshold (d) Would the project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Threshold (e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to hydrology and water quality to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to hydrology and water quality. Therefore, impacts related to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on hazards and hazardous materials, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.10.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to hydrology and water quality than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant hydrology and water quality impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 537
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 68 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.11 Land Use and Planning
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Physically divide an
established community?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Cause a significant
environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.11.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
According to the 2024 RFEIR, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not divide an established community.

The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project does not include new major infrastructure such as a freeway that could physically divide an established community. Future development and redevelopment within the Planning Area are intended to provide opportunities for new employment, housing, and recreational uses and would not physically divide the community. The 2024 RFEIR determined that the buildout of future developments under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would be subject to goals, policies, and actions of the 2024 GPU Land Use and Community Character Element. Therefore, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with applicable plans, policies, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.11.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Physically divide an established community? Threshold (b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to community division to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, with the potential to divide an established community.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any 2024 GPU policies 538
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 69 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report or programs specific to land use. The proposed modifications would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or action.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on land use and planning, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.11.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to land use and planning than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant land use and planning impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 539
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 70 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.12 Mineral Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that
would be of value to the
region and the residents of
the state?
Less than
significant
impact
No No No None
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locally
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on
a local general plan,
specific plan or other land
use plan?
No impact No No No None

5.12.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR stated that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would focus future development and redevelopment within Concept Areas, areas largely within or surrounded by existing urbanization, which would make them infeasible for mining. As identified within the 2024 RFEIR, the majority of the land within the Planning Area is designated as MRZ-3, land for which the significance of mineral resources cannot be determined, or MRZ-1, land for which adequate geologic information indicates that no significant deposits are present. As there are no mineral resource extractions within the Planning Area, the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not result in the loss of a designated mineral recovery site. Therefore, the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not result in the loss of availability of regionally valuable mineral resources and impacts would be less than significant. No impacts would occur in regard to mineral resource recovery sites.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.12.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state.

Threshold (b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
540
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 71 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to mineral resources to be less than significant in respect to the loss of available known mineral resources and found no impact regarding the loss of a designated mineral recovery site. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to mineral resources. Project implementation would result in less than significant impacts in regards to the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State and no impacts to mineral resource recovery sites.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on mineral resources, such impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.12.3 Conclusion
Since the Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to mineral resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant impacts related to mineral resources than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 541
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 72 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.13 Noise
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion in
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Generation of a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of a project in
excess of standards
established in the local
general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other
agencies?
Less than
significant
(railroad and
stationary);
Significant and
unavoidable
(traffic and
construction)
No No No MM NOS-1
b) Generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Less than
significant
(railroad and
stationary); Less
than significant
with mitigation
incorporated
(construction)
No No No MM NOS-2
c) For a project located
within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an
airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would
the project expose people
residing or working in the
project area to excessive
noise levels?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.13.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined Impacts associated with the increase in traffic volumes would be significant without mitigation. For existing noise sensitive land uses, possible noise-reduction measures would include retrofitting older structures with acoustically rated windows and doors featuring higher Sound Transmission Class ratings, which is a measure of exterior noise reduction performance. However, there is no mechanism in place for implementing such a retrofit program. In the event that existing uses are demolished and redeveloped, new homes would be required to provide sufficient sound insulation to meet City and California Building Code interior noise standards. Because it would be speculative to assume that all existing homes along impacted roadways would be redeveloped and the significant noise impacts 542
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 73 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report would be to existing homes and other noise-sensitive uses in an already urbanized area, there is no feasible mitigation. Therefore, impacts to existing sensitive land uses would remain significant and unavoidable. The 2024 RFEIR concluded that railroad noise and stationary noise would be less than significant. Impacts related to construction noise would be significant and unavoidable with implementation of MM NOS-1.

In regard to vibration, impacts related to construction vibration would be potentially significant, and implementation of MM NOS-2 would be applied to future development to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Additionally, there would be less than significant impacts to railroad sources, stationary sources, and airports, and no mitigation would be required.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM NOS-1: The Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall require applicants to demonstrate whether the project has the potential to exceed noise standards contained in Sections 8.14.040 and 11.80.030 of the Municipal Code. If a project may exceed standards or is located adjacent to sensitive receptors, the City shall require the applicant to prepare a Noise Analysis that estimates construction noise and identifies noise reduction measures that would ensure compliance with Municipal Code standards.

Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify applicable measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City. Noise reduction measures can include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities that would generate noise perceptible at the property line of the subject property are limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. from Monday through Friday excluding holidays and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays. The building inspector may issue an exception to this limitation on hours in cases of urgent necessity where the public health and safety will not be substantially impaired.

2. Idling times for noise-generating equipment used in demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes.

3. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities within 70 feet from the edge of properties with existing, occupied noise-sensitive uses shall incorporate all feasible strategies to reduce noise exposure for noise-sensitive uses, including:
a.Provide written notice to all known occupied noise-sensitive uses within 400 feet of the edge of the project site boundary at least 2 weeks prior to the start of each construction phase of the construction schedule; b.Ensure that construction equipment is properly maintained and equipped with noise control components, such as mufflers, in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications;
c. Re-route construction equipment away from adjacent noise-sensitive uses; 543
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 74 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report d.Locate noisy construction equipment away from surrounding noise-sensitive uses;
e.Use sound aprons or temporary noise enclosures around noise-generating equipment;
f. Position storage of waste materials, earth, and other supplies in a manner that will function as a noise barrier for surrounding noise-sensitive uses; g.Use the quietest practical type of equipment;
h.Use electric powered equipment instead of diesel or gasoline engine powered equipment; Use shrouding or shielding and intake and exhaust silencers/mufflers; and
i. Other effective and feasible strategies to reduce construction noise exposure for surrounding noise-sensitive uses.

4. For construction of buildings that require the installation of piles, an alternative to installation of piles by hammering shall be used. This could include the use of augured holes for cast-in-place piles, installation through vibration or hydraulic insertion, or another low-noise technique.

MM NOS-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded.

5.13.2 Analysis of Proposed Project.

Threshold (a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of a project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Threshold (b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
544
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 75 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Threshold (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No New or More Severe Impact:

As discussed above, the 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to ambient noise levels and vibration to be less than significant for railroad, stationary noise, and airports and significant and unavoidable for traffic and construction noise. According to the Project-specific traffic noise assessment prepared for the Project (see Appendix C: Traffic Noise Assessment), noise impacts for the Project were determined by comparing the change in noise levels between the buildout of the 2024 GPU with no change to the truck routes (Without Project) and the proposed truck routes modifications as discussed in this addendum (With Project). As indicated in Table 1 and Table 2 of Appendix C, the largest increase in Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) calculated at 50 feet from the center of the roadway center would be 1.0 CNEL along Gilman Springs Road south of Alessandro Boulevard. The largest decrease in CNEL calculated at 50 feet would be

2.4 CNEL along Iris Avenue, between Perris Boulevard and Kitching Street. Based on the methodology and assumptions, the analysis provides a roadway-specific assessment of how the City’s proposed truck prohibitions on internal streets affect traffic noise along segments with potentially significant traffic noise increases. As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, the With Project scenario would not increase traffic noise by more than 1.0 dBA along any roadway or freeway segment analyzed. Additionally, many roadway segments would have reduced traffic noise levels as compared to the 2024 GPU analysis, as a result of the Project (truck routes circulation update). Therefore, because the human ear doesn’t hear a noise increase of less than 3 dBA, the increase in traffic noise would not be perceptible.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to noise. Furthermore, the Project would remain consistent with the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project policies to minimize the potential noise sources and impacts generated by vehicular traffic on existing roadways. Policies include considering the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment, requiring mitigation where sensitive uses are to be placed along transportation routes to ensure that noise levels are minimized, encouraging the proper site planning and architecture to reduce noise impacts, and employing noise mitigation practices when designing future streets and highways.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
545
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 76 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on noise, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.13.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to noise than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant noise impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 546
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 77 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.14 Population and Housing
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Induce substantial
population growth in an area,
either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension
of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.14.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
According to the 2024 RFEIR, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project could result in the development of 22,052 new homes and an additional 38,915 employees within the 2024 GPU Planning Area. The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project had been designed to primarily focus future development and redevelopment within Concept Areas that consist of vacant or underutilized land along major transit corridors. Future development outside of the Concept Areas would occur in areas that are already served by infrastructure and would not require extensions into unserved portions of the Planning Area. Overall, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would exceed the State’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirements, would reduce future population and household growth compared to 2040 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) projections, and would locate future infrastructure along major transit corridors that are already served. Future redevelopment within the Concept Areas would exceed the City’s RHNA allocation and would provide additional housing that would accommodate residents that could be displayed by future development projects and ensure no net loss of housing.

Therefore, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not induce unplanned population growth and the displacement of housing and people associated with the project would not exceed the amount of housing that would be constructed under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.
547
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 78 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.14.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Threshold (b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to population and housing to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to population and housing. The 2024 GPU policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with increased population and housing within the City and would not result in any direct or indirect displacement of existing people or housing necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The proposed revisions to the City’s truck routes and Circulation Element would not conflict with implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, and impacts would be less than significant.

Project implementation would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on population and housing. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.14.3 Conclusion
Sine the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to population and housing than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the 548
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 79 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant population and housing impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 549
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 80 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.15 Public Services and Recreation
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Would the Project:
a) Result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for
any of the public services:
(i) Fire protection?
(ii) Police protection?
(iii) Schools?
(iv) Parks?
(v) Other public facilities?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such
that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated? or
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Include recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse
physical effect on the
environment?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.15.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that there is potential for service needs to increase relative to fire protection, police protection, and schoolservices with buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and increase in 43,882 new residents within the Planning Area. With payment of development impact fees, service ratios would be increased as necessary to provide adequate levels of public services. As such, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that impacts on public services would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 550
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 81 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measure from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.15.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? i. Fire Protection
ii. Police Protection
iii. Schools
iv. Parks/Recreational Facilities; or
v. Other Public Facilities
Threshold (b) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated; or
Threshold (c) Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to public services to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to public services and recreation. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas.

The proposed revisions to the City’s truck routes and Circulation Element would not conflict with implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and would not result in an increase in population or housing that would lead to an increased need in public services. Additionally, the Project revises existing actions in the City’s Circulation Element, further defining actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided and reflecting the City’s approval of the Logistics Facilities Mitigation Measure Ordinance.

Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in population which would result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection, police protection, schools, parks and recreational facilities, or other public facilities.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
551
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 82 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on public services and recreation, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.15.3 Conclusion
Since the Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to public services and recreation than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant public services and recreation impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.
552
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 83 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.16 Transportation
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue
Areas
Conclusion in
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program,
plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Significant
and
unavoidable
impact
No No No None
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.16.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined that the Project would not conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy addressing transit circulation, and impacts would be less than significant. Regarding VMT, the 2024 RFEIR determined that impacts would be significant and unavoidable, as implementation of the 2024 GPU would exceed thresholds of significance related to VMT, resulting in an increase in total VMT and VMT per Service Population. As a result of some metrics that exceeded the significance criteria based on certain analysis methodologies, impacts would be significant. The 2024 GPU includes transportation demand management (TDM) goals, policies, and actions that would support VMT reductions; however, anticipated VMT reductions associated with proposed TDM measures would not be large enough to guarantee that significant impacts could be fully mitigated. Therefore, projected VMT generated under buildout of the 2024 GPU would be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project includes policies and actions that would ensure future transportation facilities would not introduce hazards onto the circulation network, and future development and redevelopment would also be designed consistent with all safety requirements pertaining to ingress and egress onto the circulation network. Therefore, the Project would not substantially increase hazards, and impacts would be less than significant. Regarding emergency access, the 2024 RFEIR determined that adherence to applicable Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) standards and the City’s Safety Element 553
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 84 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report policies, as well as increased traffic capacity in the proposed roadway network, would ensure that the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not result in inadequate emergency access, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.16.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Threshold (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Threshold (d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts to the circulation system, hazards due to geometric design, and emergency access to be less than significant and VMT impacts to be significant and unavoidable.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, or conflict with a program, plan, or policy addressing the circulation system, substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features, or result in inadequate emergency access. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas.

The proposed revisions to the City’s truck routes and Circulation Element would not conflict with implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Additionally, the Project revises existing actions in the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Circulation Element, further defining actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided and reflecting the City’s approval of the Logistics Facilities Mitigation Measure Ordinance.

Therefore, the Project would not result in any conflicts with a program, plan, or ordinance addressing the circulation system, increase hazards, or result in inadequate emergency access.

The Project would result in a minor increase in Truck VMT. 4 As discussed in Appendix D: Vehicle Miles
Traveled Analysis, the latest version of the Riverside County Travel Demand Model (RIVCOM) (Version

4.0.1) was utilized to model isolated truck trips for the five truck routesscenarios selected for this analysis.

As part of the analysis, RIVCOM 2040 Horizon General Plan scenario was used to determine all truck 4 While the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR), now known as the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, guidance does not characterize truck trips as “automobiles” subject to VMT analysis under CEQA. As such, the VMT analysis for truck contained in this addendum is provided for informational purposes. Refer to the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, dated December 2018, for more information.
554
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 85 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report origins-destinations (OD) trips used by the current designated routes (No Project Scenario) using the select-link analysis conducted for each study route. The OD trips were then isolated for the analysis. A With Project Scenario model network was prepared by applying truck routes modifications to internal Citywide streets as directed by the City (truck-restricted links coded to prohibit truck assignment). The route-specific truck OD trip matrix developed earlier through select-link analysis was assigned to the modified network. The resulting daily truck traffic volumes by link were extracted from the model outputs.

Total daily Truck VMT was computed for all the study area links included in the studied routes and route choices for both the With Project and No Project Scenarios. Table 2: Change in 2040 Daily Truck VMT on Selected Routes & Truck Trip Origins summarizes the isolated Truck VMT results for the studied routes included in the analysis. As shown in the table, the proposed truck routes modifications will result in an increase in 2040 daily Truck VMT from the truck trip origins and truck routes subject to the proposed route modifications that were selected for this analysis. Local serving truck trips were not accounted for as they would continue to use local routes to serve commercial uses and Truck VMT on these routes would remain the same and would not be affected and are therefore not included in this analysis.

Table 2: Change in 2040 Daily Truck VMT on Selected Routes & Truck Trip Origins Study Route VMT No Project
Scenario
VMT With Project
Scenario Change
I-215 Freeway 7,972 22,380 +14,408
SR 60 Freeway 2,149 6,419 +4,270
Perris Boulevard 2,274 113 -2,161
Alessandro Boulevard 2,651 531 -2,119
Frederick Street 265 49 -217
Heacock Street 1,677 1,507 -169
Cactus Avenue 1,997 2,744 +747
Total 18,984 33,743 +14,758
This increase in Truck VMT for the selected studied routes and trip origins was then applied to the Citywide total Truck VMT to determine the net change in overall Citywide Truck VMT. Table 3: Net Change in Total Citywide Daily Truck VMT summarizes the Truck VMT results for base year and horizon year conditions.

The base year Truck VMT estimates were derived by applying the proportional change in total Citywide Truck VMT estimates between base year and future year Truck VMT results derived as part of the 2024 General Plan Update. As shown in the table, the proposed truck routes modifications are expected to result in a net increase in Citywide Truck VMT by approximately 2.8 percent, which is not considered substantial. Therefore, VMT impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Table 3: Net Change in Total Citywide Daily Truck VMT
Analysis Year VMT No Project
Scenario
VMT With Project
Scenario Net Change
2024 Base Year 296,288 304,584 +8,296 (2.8%)
2040 Horizon Year 527,078 541,836 +14,758 (2.8%)
Note: Citywide VMT results were derived as part of 2024 General Plan Update Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
555
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 86 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Project implementation would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on transportation. Therefore, impact to a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, geometric hazards, and emergency access would remain less than significant, and impacts to VMT would remain significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in 2024 RFEIR.

5.16.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to transportation than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant transportation impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 556
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 87 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.17 Utilities and Service Systems
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction of new
or expanded water, wastewater
treatment, or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural
gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause
significant environmental
effects?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry
and multiple dry years?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Result in a determination by
the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Generate solid waste in excess
of State or local standards, or in
excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) Comply with federal, state, and
local management and reduction
statutes and regulations related
to solid waste?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.17.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in less than significant impacts relative to utilities and service systems. As described in the 2024 RFEIR, buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would generate an increase of approximately 43,882 people, 22,052 new homes, 38,915 jobs by 2040, which would necessitate construction of future water supply infrastructure.

Construction of future water, wastewater, stormwater, electric power, natural gas and telecommunications facilities would be subject to 2024 GPU goals and policies intended to protect the 557
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 88 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report environment, reducing impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded water and wastewater facilities to less than significant.

The 2024 RFEIR concluded that buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not exceed forecasted water demand projections for the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), because it would reduce future population and household growth compared to 2040 SCAG projections. Similarly, the project is not expected to exceed forecasted water demand projections for the Box Spring Mutual Water Company (BSMWC), because it would reduce future population and household growth compared to SCAG projections. Therefore, buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the development from the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and impacts would be less than significant.

Additionally, the 2024 RFEIR determined that the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or more than the capacity of local infrastructure. As described in Section 4.17.2.4.d of the 2024 RFEIR, the City’s Building Code requires development projects to complete and submit a Waste Management and Recycling Plan for approval prior to issuance of building permits. Therefore, the project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, exceed the capacity of local infrastructure, or conflict with federal, state, or local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and impacts would be less than significant.

Therefore, impacts regarding utilities and service systems would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.17.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities that the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Threshold (b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Threshold (c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Threshold (d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Threshold (e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to utilities and service systems to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s 558
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 89 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to utilities and service systems.

The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas.

Additionally, the Project revises existing actions in the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Circulation Element, further defining actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided and reflecting the City’s approval of the Logistics Facilities Mitigation Measure Ordinance. Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in population, which would result in a change in utilities and service systems within the City.

Project implementation would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on utilities and service systems. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.17.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to utilities and service systems than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant utilities and service systems impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required. 559
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 90 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.18 Wildfire
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of
wildfire?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Expose people or structures
to significant risks, including
downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.18.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in less than significant impacts to wildfire. Future development would be designated, constructed, and maintained in accordance with applicable standards associated with the City’s LHMP. Compliance with the compliance with the Moreno Valley Fire Department (MVFD) regulations and 2024 GPU policies would ensure that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire, and impacts would be less than significant. Future development and corresponding infrastructure development would be subject to the MVFD regulations and 2024 GPU policies. The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not expand potential development areas that would substantially increase risk of postfire landslide or flooding. Therefore, 560
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 91 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report compliance with MVFD regulations and 2024 GPU policies would ensure that installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure would not exacerbate fire risk, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.18.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Threshold (a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Threshold (b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Threshold (c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Threshold (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The 2024 RFEIR found impacts related to wildfires to be less than significant. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to safety or wildfires. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215, prioritizing access to industrial areas. The Project would not result in site-specific development within a high fire hazard severity zone since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 561
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 92 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wildfire, such impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.18.3 Conclusion
Since the Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts related to wildfire than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant wildfire impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.
562
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 93 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 6 DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE CEQA DOCUMENTATION
The following discussion lists the appropriate subsections of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164 and provides justification for the City to make a determination of the appropriate CEQA document for the Project, based on the environmental analysis provided above.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 ‒ Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that Project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

The City proposes to implement the Project within the context of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Planning Area, as described in this Addendum. As discussed in the Environmental Impact Analysis section of this Addendum, no new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects beyond what was evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR would occur.
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

As documented herein, no circumstances associated with the location, type, setting, or operations of the Project have substantively changed beyond what was evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR; and none of the Project elements would result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects than previously identified. No major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are required. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant environmental effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
No new or substantially more significant environmental effects beyond those addressed in the 2024 RFEIR were identified.
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
Significant Project-related effects previously examined would not be substantially more severe than were disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR as a result of the Project. Impacts associated with most environmental resource areas would be the same as or less than disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. While the shifting of truck trips will result in a minimal increase in VMT (2.8 percent) and associated criteria air pollutants (less than 1 percent) and GHG emissions and roadway noise, those increases are not substantial and are consistent 563
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 94 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report with the impacts disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. The truck routes modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. The shifting of truck trips would decrease exposure to criteria air pollutants, odor-causing pollutants, roadway noise, and incremental carcinogenic risk for the majority of sensitive receptors. A few receptors areas may have slightly increased exposure and incremental higher carcinogenic risk; however, such carcinogenic risk would remain below SCAQMD incremental thresholds. The minor increase in greenhouse gas emissions from the minor increase in Truck VMT is not substantial as it would be negligible in magnitude and would not result in new or more severe impacts. Odor and roadway noise impacts would remain less than significant. Implementation of the Project within the context of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or No new feasible mitigation measures or alternatives were identified. (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

No new or different mitigation measures or feasible alternatives have been identified to substantially reduce significant impacts.
(b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subsection (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation.

After certification of the 2024 RFEIR in April 2026, additional technical analyses were performed for the Project and are the subject of this Addendum. Based on the analysis in this document, the Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects, nor would it substantially increase the severity of significant effects previously identified in the 2024 RFEIR. None of the conditions listed under subsection (a) would occur that would require preparation of a SEIR. (c) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency’s role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approval on that project is required. Information appearing after an approval does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions described in subsection (a) occurs, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall only be prepared by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this situation, no other Responsible Agency shall grant an approval for the project until the subsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted.

None of the conditions listed in subsection (a) would occur as a result of the Project. No SEIR is required. 564
Determination of Appropriate CEQA Documentation
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 95 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 ‒ Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.

As described above, none of the conditions described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a SEIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

None of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR would occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, an addendum to the certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the FEIR or adopted negative declaration.

This Addendum will be attached to the 2024 RFEIR and maintained in the administrative record files at the City.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the 2024 RFEIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.

The City will consider this Addendum with the 2024 RFEIR prior to making a decision on the Project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the Project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.

This document provides substantial evidence for City records to support the preparation of this Addendum for the Project.
565
Conclusion
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 96 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 7 CONCLUSION
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines to document the finding that none of the conditions or circumstances that would require preparation of a SEIR, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and Section 15164, exist in connection with the Project. No major revisions would be required to the 2024 RFEIR as a result of the Project. No new or substantially more significant environmental impacts have been identified. Since the certification of the 2024 RFEIR, there has been no new information showing that mitigation measures or alternatives once considered infeasible are now feasible or showing that there are feasible new mitigation measures or alternatives substantially different from those analyzed in the EIR that the City declined to adopt.

Therefore, preparation of a SEIR is not required and the appropriate CEQA document for the Project is this Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. This document will be maintained in the administrative record files at the City.
566
References
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 97 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 8 REFERENCES
California Legislative Information, Senate Bill No. 415 (2025), Planning and Zoning, Logistics Use Development Truck Routes,
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB415.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2026. Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2026, Traffic Noise Assessment.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2026. Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2026. 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Revised Final Program EIR. 567
References
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Routes Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 98 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report This page intentionally left blank.
568
Appendix A
MoVal 2040 Revised Final EIR
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Appendix A
MoVal 2040 Revised Final EIR
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Kimley»Horn
569
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-1

4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires that a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) be adopted upon certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR; including associated Findings), to ensure that the associated mitigation measures are implemented. Table 4-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, identifies the mitigation measures and specifies the entity (or entities) responsible for monitoring and reporting. Pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21081.6, an MMRP is only required for impacts identified as significant or potentially significant in the EIR analysis. The environmental analysis resulted in the identification of a programmatic mitigation framework, which would reduce potentially significant impacts, but not to below a level of significance for all the environmental topics. Programmatic mitigation measures have been identified for air quality, biological resources, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, geology/soils, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise.

In response to the aforementioned settlement negotiations between the City of Moreno Valley and the State of California Office of the Attorney General (AGO), which concluded in April 2026, related to various air quality mitigation measures the AGO opined were necessary to ensure compliance with the Statement of Decision, embodied in the Judgment and Writ issued on May 6, 2024, in Sierra Club v. The City of Moreno Valley, Case No. CVRI2103300 (CEQA Case), this MMRP was revised to memorialize the negotiated mitigation measures as enhancements to Mitigation Measure (MM) AQ-5. However, since the negotiated mitigation measures added to MM AQ-5 will not result in any new significant impacts than identified in the Revised Final EIR (September 2025), and since they will not create any new or more severe impacts, the revisions do not necessitate recirculation. These enhancements and minor editorial revisions are demonstrated in red underline.

MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank.
4-2
571
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-3
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials

4.3 Air Quality
AQ-1: Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have construction and operational air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the air quality impact analysis shall be included in the development project’s CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis shall incorporate SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts to the greatest extent feasible.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City
AQ-2: Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed applicable thresholds shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable. The measures shall be included as notes on the grading and/or demolition plans:
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excess amounts of dust.
• Pre-grading/excavation activities shall include watering the area to be graded or excavated before commencement of grading or excavation operations. Application of watering (preferably reclaimed water, if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities. This measure can achieve PM10 reductions of 61 percent through application of water every three hours to disturbed areas.
• Fugitive dust produced during grading, excavation, and construction activities shall be controlled by the following activities:

4.3 Air Quality
AQ-1: Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall | Technical analysis required | City have construction and operational air quality impacts analyzed using | prior to project approval. the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the air quality impact analysis shall be included in the development project's CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis shall incorporate SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts to the greatest extent feasible.

AQ-2: Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will | Technical analysis required | City generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed | prior to project approval applicable thresholds shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable. The measures shall be included as notes on the grading and/or demolition plans:
e The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excess amounts of dust. e Pre-grading/excavation activities shall include watering the area to be graded or excavated before commencement of grading or excavation operations. Application of watering (preferably reclaimed water, if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities. This measure can achieve PM10 reductions of 61 percent through application of water every three hours to disturbed areas.
eo Fugitive dust produced during grading, excavation, and construction activities shall be controlled by the following activities:
572
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-4
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
o All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as
required by California Vehicle Section 23114. Covering
loads and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches
can reduce PM10 emissions by 91 percent.
o All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways, shall be treated to prevent
fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not
necessarily be limited to, periodic watering at not less than three hour intervals, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate. Watering shall be done as often as
necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever
possible. Application of water every three hours to
disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 61
percent.
• Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site shall be monitored at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods, such as water and roll-compaction, and environmentally safe dust control materials, shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. If no further grading or excavation operations are planned for the area, the area shall be seeded and watered until grass growth is evident, or periodically treated with
environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. Replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 5 percent.
• Signs shall be posted on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. This measure can reduce associated PM10 emissions by 57 percent.
• During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties; instantaneous wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour), all clearing, grading, earthMoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials o All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Section 23114. Covering
loads and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches
can reduce PM10 emissions by 91 percent. o All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways, shall be treated to prevent
fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not
necessarily be limited to, periodic watering at not less than three hour intervals, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate. Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Application of water every three hours to
disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 61
percent.
eo Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site shall be monitored at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods, such as water and roll-compaction, and environmentally safe dust control materials, shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. If no further grading or excavation operations are planned for the area, the area shall be seeded and watered until grass growth is evident, or periodically treated with
environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. Replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 5 percent.
e Signs shall be posted on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. This measure can reduce associated PM10 emissions by 57 percent.
e During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties; instantaneous wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour), all clearing, grading, earth573 MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-5
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
moving, and excavation operations shall be curtailed to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by on-site activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard off-site or on-site. The site superintendent/supervisor shall use his/her discretion in conjunction with SCAQMD when winds are excessive (above 25 miles per hour).
• Adjacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads.
• Personnel involved in grading operations, including contractors and subcontractors, shall be required to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations.

AQ-3: Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable thresholds, shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by the SCAQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to:
• Construction haul truck operators for demolition debris and import/export of soil shall use trucks that meet CARB’s 2020 engine emissions standards of 0.01 grams per brake horsepowerhour of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 grams per brake horsepower-hour of NOx emissions. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards and shall provide these records prior to grading permit issuance to the City.
• Construction vehicle idling shall be limited to five minutes as set forth in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Signs shall be posted in areas where they will be seen by Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials moving, and excavation operations shall be curtailed to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by on-site activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard off-site or on-site. The site superintendent/supervisor shall use his/her discretion in conjunction with SCAQMD when winds are excessive (above 25 miles per hour).
eo Adjacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads.
eo Personnel involved in grading operations, including contractors and subcontractors, shall be required to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations.

AQ-3: Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would | Technical analysis required | City generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable | prior to project approval thresholds, shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by the SCAQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to:
eo Construction haul truck operators for demolition debris and import/export of soil shall use trucks that meet CARB’s 2020 engine emissions standards of 0.01grams per brake horsepowerhour of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 grams per brake horsepower-hour of NOx emissions. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards and shall provide these records prior to grading permit issuance to the City.
eo Construction vehicle idling shall be limited to five minutes as set forth in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Signs shall be posted in areas where they will be seen by 574
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-6
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
vehicle operators stating idling time limits. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall utilize construction equipment that uses low polluting fuels (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) to the extent that they are available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Heavy duty diesel-fueled equipment shall use low NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall use electricity from power poles rather than temporary gasoline or diesel-powered generators, as technically and logistically feasible, or solar where available. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall maintain construction equipment in good, properly tuned operating condition, as specified by the manufacturer, to minimize exhaust emissions. Documentation demonstrating that the equipment has been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications shall be shared with the City prior to grading permit issuance.
• Construction contractors shall reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas, as technically and logistically feasible. This requirement shall be included on the plans.

AQ-4: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Localized Significance Threshold analysis shall be prepared for construction and operations. If the LST analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution reduction measures shall be implemented to ensure that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials vehicle operators stating idling time limits. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
eo Construction contractors shall utilize construction equipment that uses low polluting fuels (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) to the extent that they are available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
eo Heavy duty diesel-fueled equipment shall use low NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
eo Construction contractors shall use electricity from power poles rather than temporary gasoline or diesel-powered generators, as technically and logistically feasible, or solar where available. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
eo Construction contractors shall maintain construction equipment in good, properly tuned operating condition, as specified by the manufacturer, to minimize exhaust emissions. Documentation demonstrating that the equipment has been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications shall be shared with the City prior to grading permit issuance.
eo Construction contractors shall reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas, as technically and logistically feasible. This requirement shall be included on the plans.

AQ-4: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Localized Significance Threshold | Technical analysis required | City analysis shall be prepared for construction and operations. If the LST| prior to project approval analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution reduction measures shall be implemented to ensure that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded.
575
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-7
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
AQ-5a: A project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be conducted for future development projects that would generate toxic air contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. Consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 98 and Senate Bill (SB) 415, logistics use facility projects within 900 feet of sensitive receptorsto shall conduct an operational HRA. The HRA shall evaluate a project when unmitigated emissions are expected to meet or exceed per the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds:
• Carcinogens: Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 10 in one million. For cumulative cancer risk, the maximum exposed individual risk equals or exceeds
significance thresholds established by SCAQMD.
• Non‐Carcinogens: Emit toxic contaminants that equal or exceed 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

If projects are found to exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds, mitigation, including but not limited to requiring heavy-duty trucks, forklifts and/or yard trucks to be zero-emission, forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes, installing photo-voltaic systems, running conduit for future electric truck charging, requiring all stand-by generators to be non-diesel, designing to LEED green building certifications, and improving vegetation and tree canopy for shade, shall be incorporated to reduce impacts to below SCAQMD thresholds. The HRA shall be submitted to the City Planning Department to demonstrate that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded prior to issuance of building permits for any future discretionary residential or residential mixed-use project.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City
AQ-5b: The City of Moreno Valley shall create an abatement fund to subsidize air filtration and/or Heating, Ventilation, Air Condition (HVAC) systems for residents within 1,000 feet of the property line of any logistics use facility projects or within 1,000 feet of a dedicated truck route, thereby abating air quality impacts for the most impacted sensitive receptors.

Prior to the issuance of the
first certificate of
occupancy for any logistics
use facility project
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials AQ-5a: A project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be conducted for | Technical analysis required | City future development projects that would generate toxic air | prior to project approval contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. Consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 98 and Senate Bill (SB) 415, logistics use facility projects within 900 feet of sensitive receptors to shall conduct an operational HRA. The HRA shall evaluate a project when unmitigated emissions are expected to meet or exceed per the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)thresholds:
eo (Carcinogens: Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 10 in one million. For cumulative cancer risk, the maximum exposed individual risk equals or exceeds
significance thresholds established by SCAQMD.
eo Non-Carcinogens: Emit toxic contaminants that equal or exceed 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

If projects are found to exceed the SCAQMD's thresholds, mitigation, including but not limited to requiring heavy-duty trucks, forklifts and/or yard trucks to be zero-emission, forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes, installing photo-voltaic systems, running conduit for future electric truck charging, requiring all stand-by generators to be non-diesel, designing to LEED green building certifications, and improving vegetation and tree canopy for shade, shall be incorporated to reduce impacts to below SCAQMD thresholds. The HRA shall be submitted to the City Planning Department to demonstrate that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded prior to issuance of building permits for any future discretionary residential or residential mixed-use project.

AQ-5b: The City of Moreno Valley shall create an abatement fund to subsidize | Prior to the issuance of the air filtration and/or Heating, Ventilation, Air Condition (HVAC) systems| first certificate of for residents within 1,000 feet of the property line of any logistics use | occupancy for any logistics facility projects or within 1,000 feet of a dedicated truck route, thereby | use facility project abating air quality impacts for the most impacted sensitive receptors. 576
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-8
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
The City of Moreno Valley may choose to administer the abatement fund or designate its administration to a third party which will require an additional 10 percent administrative fee. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all logistics use facility project applicants shall pay a one-time fee of $1,500 for each daily truck trip the logistics use facility project is estimated to induce.

AQ-5c: All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following design and construction requirements shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall be located at least 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors.
• All logistics use facility projects shall include a solid wall and/or a landscaped berm of at least 15 feet in height, separating the project and nearby sensitive receptors.
• All logistic facility projects shall ensure that the project parking lots have at least 35 percent of the tree shade cover within 15 years of commencement of operations.
• All logistics use facility projects shall make at least 25 percent of passenger car vehicle parking electric vehicle (EV)-ready, with at least 15 percent of passenger parking spots equipped with Level 2 chargers.
• All logistics use facility projects shall be equipped with EVready conduits at each truck door or parking spot to support an EV charger and at least 50 percent of these shall be installed with fast chargers.
• All logistics use facility projects that include refrigerated storage shall provide fully functional transportation
refrigeration unit (TRU) plug-ins or similar electrical hookups at all truck loading bays or dock doors.
• All logistics use facility projects totaling over 400,000 square feet in total footprint shall maintain a lounge for truck Prior to and during
construction for any
logistics use facility project
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials The City of Moreno Valley may choose to administer the abatement fund or designate its administration to a third party which will require an additional 10 percent administrative fee. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all logistics use facility project applicants shall pay a one-time fee of $1,500 for each daily truck trip the logistics use facility project is estimated to induce.

AQ-5c: All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the Prior to and during City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following design and construction for any construction requirements shall be implemented, as applicable to the | logistics use facility project project:
eo All logistics use facility projects shall be located at least 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors.
e Alllogistics use facility projects shall include a solid wall and/or a landscaped berm of at least 15 feet in height, separating the project and nearby sensitive receptors.
eo All logistic facility projects shall ensure that the project parking lots have at least 35 percent of the tree shade cover within 15 years of commencement of operations.
eo All logistics use facility projects shall make at least 25 percent of passenger car vehicle parking electric vehicle (EV)-ready, with at least 15 percent of passenger parking spots equipped with Level 2 chargers.
eo All logistics use facility projects shall be equipped with EVready conduits at each truck door or parking spot to support an EV charger and at least 50 percent of these shall be installed with fast chargers.
eo All logistics use facility projects that include refrigerated storage shall provide fully functional transportation
refrigeration unit (TRU) plug-ins or similar electrical hookups at all truck loading bays or dock doors.
eo All logistics use facility projects totaling over 400,000 square feet in total footprint shall maintain a lounge for truck 577
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-9
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
operators with amenities including restrooms, vending
machines, and air conditioning.
• All construction equipment, including smaller equipment (such as hand tools and power washers), shall be zeroemission if feasible and commercially available within the State of California. If it is not feasible to utilize zero-emission construction equipment, or such equipment is not
commercially available within the State of California, all such construction equipment shall meet the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) Tier 4 certification and low-polluting fuels (e.g., low NOx diesel).
• All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during construction except for emergencies. • The idling of all construction equipment and constructionrelated vehicles shall be limited to three (3) minutes. • Grading and earthmoving activitiesshall be prohibited on days with an Air Quality Index (AQI) greater than 100.

AQ-5d: All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following operational measures shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall utilize trucks with a minimum 2014 model year by 2027.
• All logistics use facility projects shall use 100 percent zero emission vehicles (ZEV) for forklifts, yard trucks, and other onsite equipment. • All logistics use facility projects shall have signage noting a three (3)-minute idling limit and shall provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-complaint call-in line to submit idling complaints.
• All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during operation except for emergencies.

Prior to the issuance of the
first certificate of
occupancy for any logistics
use facility project
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials operators with amenities including restrooms, vending
machines, and air conditioning.
eo All construction equipment, including smaller equipment (such as hand tools and power washers), shall be zero- emission if feasible and commercially available within the State of California. If it is not feasible to utilize zero-emission construction equipment, or such equipment is not
commercially available within the State of California, all such construction equipment shall meet the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) Tier 4 certification and low-polluting fuels (e.g., low NOx diesel).
e All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during construction except for emergencies. eo The idling of all construction equipment and constructionrelated vehicles shall be limited to three (3) minutes. eo Grading and earthmoving activities shall be prohibited on days with an Air Quality Index (AQ) greater than 100.

AQ-5d: All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the Prior to the issuance of the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following operational first certificate of measures shall be implemented, as applicable to the project: occupancy for any logistics e All logistics use facility projects shall utilize trucks with a | use facility project minimum 2014 model year by 2027.
eo All logistics use facility projects shall use 100 percent zero emission vehicles (ZEV) for forklifts, yard trucks, and other on- site equipment. eo All logistics use facility projects shall have signage noting a three (3)-minute idling limit and shall provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-complaint call-in line to submit idling complaints.
e All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during operation except for emergencies. 578
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-10
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
• All logistics use facility projects shall provide workers with secure bicycle storage facilities with outlets for electric bicycles and on-site meals or lunch shuttle programs.
• All logistics use facility projects shall also provide workers with transit route information and incentives to carpool, such as dedicated carpool parking spaces.
• All logistics use facility projects shall implement training programs for managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to minimize truck queuing and idling.

4.4 Biological Resources
BIO-1: Applications for future development of vacant properties (and portions thereof), wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to sensitive biological resources, shall be required to prepare a site-specific general biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources, including any sensitive plant or wildlife species.

The report shall identify the need for focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated wetlands or waters. If potentially significant impacts to sensitive biological resources, including sensitive species and/or wetlands are identified, the report shall also recommend appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City/Qualified Biologist
BIO-2: Applications for future development, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to mature trees and/or native vegetation suitable for nesting birds, shall be required to restrict removal of sensitive habitat and vegetation to outside the breeding seasons of any sensitive species identified within adjacent properties (typical bird breeding season is February 1–September 1. as early as January 1 for some raptors). If vegetation clearing must begin during the breeding season, a qualified biologist shall provide recommendations to avoid impacts to nesting birds which typically includes a pre-construction survey Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City/Qualified Biologist
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure
Responsible for
Timing of Verification Verification
BIO-1:
eo All logistics use facility projects shall provide workers with secure bicycle storage facilities with outlets for electric bicycles and on-site meals or lunch shuttle programs.
e All logistics use facility projects shall also provide workers with transit route information and incentives to carpool, such as dedicated carpool parking spaces. eo All logistics use facility projects shall implement training programs for managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to minimize truck queuing and idling.

IY R=sources
Applications for future development of vacant properties (and portions thereof}, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to sensitive biological resources, shall be required to prepare a site-specific general biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources, including any sensitive plant or wildlife species.

Technical analysis required | City/Qualified Biologist
prior to project approval.

BIO-2: Applications for future development, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to mature trees and/or native vegetation suitable for nesting birds, shall be required to restrict removal of sensitive habitat and vegetation to outside the breeding seasons of any sensitive species identified within adjacent properties (typical bird breeding season is February 1-September 1. as early as January 1 for some raptors). If vegetation clearing must begin during the breeding season, a qualified biologist shall provide recommendations to avoid impacts to nesting birds which typically includes a pre-construction survey Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City/QualifiedBiologist
4-10
579
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-11
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
within 3 days of the start of construction to determine the presence of active nests.

Periodic noise monitoring shall be conducted during construction to ensure noise attenuation standards are met. Accepted noise levels are species dependent and existing ambient noise levels can play a factor in establishing baseline acceptable noise.

4.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future development sitespecific project that would directly or indirectly affect a building/structure in excess of 50 years of age, the City or a qualified architectural historian shall determine whether the affected building/structure is historically significant. The evaluation shall be based on criteria such as age, location, context, association with an important person or event, uniqueness, or structural integrity, as indicated in the CEQA Guidelines. If the evaluation determines that building/structure is not historic, no further evaluation or mitigation would be required. If the building/structure is determined to be historically significant, the preferred mitigation would be to avoid the resource through project redesign. If the resource cannot be avoided, all prudent and feasible measures to minimize or mitigate harm to the resource shall be taken per recommendations of the qualified architectural historian.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City/Qualified
Architectural Historian
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials within 3 days of the start of construction to determine the presence of active nests.

IE =!and Tribal Cultural Resources >
CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future development site- | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified specific project that would directly or indirectly affect a | prior to project approval. Architectural Historian building/structure in excess of 50 years of age, the City or a qualified architectural historian shall determine whether the affected building/structure is historically significant. The evaluation shall be based on criteria such as age, location, context, association with an important person or event, uniqueness, or structural integrity, as indicated in the CEQA Guidelines. If the evaluation determines that building/structure is not historic, no further evaluation or mitigation would be required. If the building/structure is determined to be historically significant, the preferred mitigation would be to avoid the resource through project redesign. If the resource cannot be avoided, all prudent and feasible measures to minimize or mitigate harm to the resource shall be taken per recommendations of the qualified architectural historian.
4-11
580
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-12
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
CUL-2: Prior to issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project that would potentially have a direct or indirect affect an archaeological resource, the City shall require the following steps be taken to determine: (1) the presence of archaeological resources, and (2) the appropriate mitigation for any significant resources which may be impacted by project development. The following steps would help determine the presence or absence of archaeological resources.

Step 2: After review of this data, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist.

Step 4: The results of the excavation will be evaluated using the Thresholds above in Section 4.5.4.

Step 5: If an archaeological resource is determined significant and avoidance through project redesign is not feasible, a data recovery and construction monitoring program must be
implemented to reduce the impacts the archaeological
resource to below a significant level. The data recovery program must be approved by the City.

Step 6: A final data recovery and/monitoring report shall be completed in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports:

City/Qualified
Archaeologist
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials CUL-2: Prior to issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project that | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified would potentially have a direct or indirect affect an archaeological | prior to project approval. Archaeologist resource, the City shall require the following steps be taken to determine: (1) the presence of archaeological resources, and (2) the appropriate mitigation for any significant resources which may be impacted by project development. The following steps would help determine the presence or absence of archaeological resources. Step 1: An archaeologist shall conduct records and background research at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) for a list of recorded resources and request a sacred lands file search from the Native American Heritage Commission.

Step 2: After review of this data, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist.

Step 4: The results of the excavation will be evaluated using the Thresholds above in Section 4.5.4.

Step 5: If an archaeological resource is determined significant and avoidance through project redesign is not feasible, a data recovery and construction monitoring program must be
implemented to reduce the impacts the archaeological
resource to below a significant level. The data recovery program must be approved by the City.

Step 6: A final data recovery and/monitoring report shall be completed in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s ArchaeologicalResource Management Reports:

Recommended Content andFormat. Confidential attachments must be submitted under separate covers. Artifacts collected during the evaluation and data recovery phases must be
curated at an appropriate facility consistent with state 4-12
581
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-13
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
(California State Historic Resources Commission’s Guidelines for Curation of Archaeological Collection 1993) and federal curation standards (36 CFR 79 of the Federal Register) and that allows access to artifact collections.

CUL-3: Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project developer shall retain a professional archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), at no cost to the City, to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the respective project. The Project Archaeologist shall be authorized to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), which have requested monitoring, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) as defined in CUL-5. The Project Archeologist shall attend all pre-grading meetings with the City, the project’s construction manager, the project’s general contractor and the pertinent contractors. In addition, the Project’s Archaeologist shall provide and conduct Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training, which the project’s construction manager, general contractor, and all pertinent subcontracts shall be required to attend. In addition, to the Project Archaeologist, the designated archaeological monitor for the respective project shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City/Qualified
Archaeologist
CUL-4: Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project Developer shall secure agreements with the Consulting Tribe(s). The project developer shall provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance notice to the tribes of all ground-disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Native American Monitor(s) shall be invited to attend all pre-grading meetings with the Project Archaeologist, the City, the construction manager, and general contractor, and any pertinent Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City/Qualified
Archaeologist/Consulting
Tribe(s)
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials (California State Historic Resources Commission’s Guidelines for Curation of Archaeological Collection 1993) and federal curation standards (36 CFR 79 of the Federal Register) and that allows access to artifact collections.

CUL-3: Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified project developer shall retain a professional archaeologist (Project | prior to project approval Archaeologist Archaeologist), at no cost to the City, to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the respective project. The Project Archaeologist shall be authorized to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), which have requested monitoring, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) as defined in CUL-5. The Project Archeologist shall attend all pre-grading meetings with the City, the project’s construction manager, the project's general contractor and the pertinent contractors. In addition, the Project's Archaeologist shall provide and conduct Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training, which the project's construction manager, general contractor, and all pertinent subcontracts shall be required to attend. In addition, to the Project Archaeologist, the designated archaeological monitor for the respective project shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

CUL-4: Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified project Developer shall secure agreements with the Consulting | prior to project approval Archaeologist/Consulting Tribe(s). The project developer shall provide a minimum of 30 days’ Tribe(s) advance notice to the tribes of all ground-disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Native American Monitor(s) shall be invited to attend all pre-grading meetings with the Project Archaeologist, the City, the construction manager, and general contractor, and any pertinent 4-13
582
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-14
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
subcontractors and conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

CUL-5: The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the project’s construction manager and general contractor, and the City shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

During Construction City/Qualified
Archaeologist/Consulting
Tribe(s)
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials subcontractors and conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

CUL-5: The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s}, | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified the project's construction manager and general contractor, and the | prior to project approval Archaeologist/Consulting City shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in Tribe(s) AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

A Consulting Tribe is defined as a Tribe that initiated the AB 52 and/or SB 18 tribal consultation process for the project, and has not opted out of the AB 52 and/or SB 18 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 and/or SB 18 consultation with the City as provided for in PRC Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB 52. Details in the Plan shall include: a. Project description and location b. Project grading and development scheduling; c. Roles and responsibilities of individuals on the project; d. The pre-grading meeting and Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training details; e. The protocols and stipulations that the project's construction manager and general contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s), and Project Archaeologist will follow in the event of
inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
f. The type of recordation needed for inadvertent finds and the stipulations of recordation of sacred items.
g. Contact information of relevant individuals for the project; CUL-6: In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered | During Construction City/Qualified during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent Archaeologist/Consulting discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final Tribe(s) disposition of the discoveries: a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
4-14
583
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-15
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if
feasible. Preservation-In-place means avoiding the
resources, leaving them in the place they were found
with no grading or construction activities commencing
that may potentially affect or otherwise impact the
integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure
CUL-3. This shall include measures and provisions to
protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been
completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted
without the written consent of all Consulting Native
American Tribal Governments as defined in CUL-5 The
location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file with the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal
Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

CUL-7: The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan of any future site-specific project: “If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground–disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City/Qualified
Archaeologist/Consulting
Tribe(s)
CUL-8: If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at any future site-specific project that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, all ground-disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person During Construction City/Qualified
Archaeologist/Consulting
Tribe(s)
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if
feasible. Preservation-In-place means avoiding the
resources, leaving them in the place they were found
with no grading or construction activities commencing
that may potentially affect or otherwise impact the
integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure
CUL-3. This shall include measures and provisions to
protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been
completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted
without the written consent of all Consulting Native
American Tribal Governments as defined in CUL-5 The
location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file with the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal
Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

CUL-7: The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading | Technical analysis required | City/Qualified Plan of any future site-specific project: “If any suspected archaeological | prior to project approval Archaeologist/Consulting resources are discovered during ground—disturbing activities and the Tribe(s) Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find.

CUL-8: If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during | During Construction City/Qualified excavation or construction activities at any future site-specific project Archaeologist/Consulting that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or Tribe(s) environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, all ground-disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person 4-15
584
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-16
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologists and Tribal Monitors if needed. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in CUL-4 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

CUL-9: Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) at the San Diego State University (SDSU) and one (1) copy During Construction City/Qualified
Archaeologist
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologists and Tribal Monitors if needed. Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in CUL-4 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase lI data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

CUL-9: Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the | During Construction City/Qualified Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase Ill Data Archaeologist Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC)at the SanDiego State University (SDSU) and one {1) copy 4-16
585
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-17
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
shall be submitted to each of the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

CUL-10: If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings as to if the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains. (PRC Section 5097.98). (GP Objective 23.3, CEQA). No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the consulting Tribe[s].

During Construction City/Qualified
Archaeologist/County
Coroner
CUL-11: It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act.

The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

City/Qualified
Archaeologist/County
Coroner

4.7 Geology/Soils
PAL-1: Applications for future development, wherein the Community Development Director or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to paleontological resources, shall review the underlying geology and paleontological sensitivity of the site. If it is determined that the potential exists that sensitive paleontological resources are present, the applicant shall be required to comply with the following mitigation framework.

A qualified paleontological monitor shall be present during grading in project areas where a project specific geological technical study has determined that such monitoring is necessary due to the potential for During Construction City/Qualified
Paleontologist
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials shall be submitted to each of the ConsultingTribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

CUL-10: If human remains are discovered, no further disturbance shall occur in | During Construction City/Qualified the affected area until the County Coroner has made necessary findings Archaeologist/County as to if the County Coroner determines that the remains are potentially Coroner Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission shall be notified within 24 hours of the published finding to be given a reasonable opportunity to identify the “most likely descendant”. The “most likely descendant” shall then make recommendations and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains.-(PRC Section 5097.98). (GPObjective 23.3, CEQA).No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the consulting Tribe[s].

CUL-11: It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, City/Qualified the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or Archaeologist/County associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed Coroner by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act.

Icy soils _______________
PAL-1: Applications for future development, wherein the Community | During Construction City/Qualified Development Director or his or her designee has determined a Paleontologist potential for impacts to paleontological resources, shall review the underlying geology and paleontological sensitivity of the site. If it is determined that the potential exists that sensitive paleontological resources are present, the applicant shall be required to comply with the following mitigation framework.

A qualified paleontological monitor shall be present during grading in project areas where a project specific geological technical study has determined that such monitoring is necessary due to the potential for 4-17
586
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-18
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
paleontological resources to reside within the underlying geologic formations. The geologic technical study shall also provide specific duties of the monitor, and detailed measures to address fossil remains, if found.

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG-1: The City of Moreno Valley shall monitor implementation of the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and update and maintain the CAP monitoring schedule, adding or enhancing Actions and Measures to achieve City of Moreno Valley-specific reductions targets in line with Senate Bill (SB) 32 (2016) and Assembly Bill (AB) 1279 (2022). Specifically, the City shall:
a) Monitor continuously and report annually on CAP
implementation activities. The annual monitoring report shall include the implementation status of each Action and Measure b) Calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions annually and monitor progress towards achieving the performance
targets of each Action and Measure
c) Update the community-wideGHG emissions inventories and targets aligned with SB 32 and AB 1279 every two to three years, in alignment with the five-year cycle specified below d) Prepare and adopt a fully updated CAP starting in 2029, and adopted by 2030, and every five years thereafter as needed if the inventories are showing the City of Moreno Valley is not on track to achieve the 2045 targets.
e) Adopt Actions and Measures to close any “reduction gaps” between the updated inventories and applicable 2040 and 2045 targets no later than December 31, 2030
f) Create, enhance, expand, or replace Actions and Measures, as new technologies and programs emerge that warrant inclusion in the CAP
Annually City
GHG-2: For each discretionary project subject to and not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant shall:
a) Complete the City’s GHG Emissions Analysis Compliance Checklist to assist with determining project consistency with the Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
if found.
paleontological resources to reside within the underlying geologic formations. The geologic technical study shall also provide specific duties of the monitor, and detailed measures to address fossil remains, IE houseGasEmissions
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
GHG-1: The City of Moreno Valley shall monitor implementation of the Climate Action Plan (CAP} and update and maintain the CAP monitoring schedule, adding or enhancing Actions and Measures to achieve City of Moreno Valley-specific reductions targets in line with SenateBill(SB)32 (2016) and AssemblyBill(AB)1279 (2022). Specifically,the City shall:

Monitor continuously and report annually on CAP
implementation activities. The annual monitoring report shall include the implementation status of each Action and Measure Calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions annually and monitor progress towards achieving the performance
targets of each Action and Measure
Update the community-wide GHG emissions inventories and targets aligned with SB32 and AB 1279 every two to three years, in alignment with the five-year cycle specified below Prepare and adopt a fully updated CAPstarting in 2029, and adopted by 2030, and every five years thereafter as needed if the inventories are showing the City of Moreno Valley is not on track to achieve the 2045 targets.

Adopt Actions and Measures to close any “reduction gaps” between the updated inventories and applicable 2040 and 2045 targets no later than December 31, 2030
Create, enhance, expand, or replace Actions and Measures, as new technologies and programs emerge that warrant inclusion in the CAP
Annually City
a)
GHG-2: For eachdiscretionaryproject subjectto and not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),the applicant shall:

Complete the City’s GHG Emissions Analysis Compliance
Checklist to assist with determining project consistency with the Technical analysis required
prior to project approval
City
4-18
587
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-19
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
Moreno Valley CAP, with the exception of logistics use facility projects that are not permitted to utilize the Checklist for CEQA streamlining, and
b) Incorporate appropriate GHG reduction measures to achieve their proportion of GHG emission reductions consistent with the assumptions of the CAP, and
c) Document the infeasibility or inapplicability of CAP measures, and
d) Propose alternative GHG reduction measures, as appropriate; or e) Demonstrate through a quantitative analysis that the project would not impede (or would facilitate) Moreno Valley’s ability to meet the GHG emissions reduction targets. Because GHG
emissions from industrial land uses were excluded from the CAP, applicants of projects that include industrial uses must establish, with substantial evidence.

4.13 Noise
NOS-1: The Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall require applicants to demonstrate whether the project has the potential to exceed noise standards contained in Sections 8.14.040 and

11.80.030 of the Municipal Code. If a project may exceed standards or is located adjacent to sensitive receptors, the City shall require the applicant to prepare a Noise Analysis that estimates construction noise and identifies noise reduction measures that would ensure compliance with Municipal Code standards. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify applicable measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City. Noise reduction measures can include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities that would generate noise perceptible at the property line of the subject property are limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. from Monday through Friday excluding holidays and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on
Saturdays. The building inspector may issue an exception to Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
NOS-1:

Moreno Valley CAP,with the exception of logistics use facility projects that are not permitted to utilize the Checklist for CEQA streamlining, and
b) Incorporate appropriate GHG reduction measures to achieve their proportion of GHG emission reductions consistent with the assumptions of the CAP, and
c) Document the infeasibility or inapplicability of CAP measures, and
d) Propose alternative GHG reduction measures, as appropriate; or e) Demonstrate through a quantitative analysis that the project would not impede (or would facilitate) Moreno Valley's ability to meet the GHG emissions reduction targets. Because GHG
emissions from industrial land uses were excluded from the CAP, applicants of projects that include industrial uses must establish, with substantial evidence.

The Director of Community Development or his or her designee shall require applicants to demonstrate whether the project has the potential to exceed noise standards contained in Sections 8.14.040 and

1. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities that would generate noise perceptible at the property line of the subject property are limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. from Monday through Friday excluding holidays and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays. The building inspector may issue an exception to Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City
4-19
588
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-20
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
this limitation on hours in cases of urgent necessity where the public health and safety will not be substantially
impaired.

2. Idling times for noise-generating equipment used in
demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes.

3. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities within 70 feet from the edge of properties with existing, occupied noise-sensitive uses shall incorporate all feasible strategies to reduce noise exposure for noisesensitive uses, including:
a. Provide written notice to all known occupied noisesensitive uses within 400 feet of the edge of the project site boundary at least 2 weeks prior to the start of each construction phase of the construction schedule;
b. Ensure that construction equipment is properly
maintained and equipped with noise control
components, such as mufflers, in accordance with
manufacturers’ specifications;
c. Re-route construction equipment away from adjacent
noise-sensitive uses;
d. Locate noisy construction equipment away from
surrounding noise-sensitive uses;
e. Use sound aprons or temporary noise enclosures around noise-generating equipment;
f. Position storage of waste materials, earth, and other supplies in a manner that will function as a noise barrier for surrounding noise-sensitive uses;
g. Use the quietest practical type of equipment;
h. Use electric powered equipment instead of diesel or
gasoline engine powered equipment; Use shrouding or
shielding and intake and exhaust silencers/mufflers; and MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials this limitation on hours in cases of urgent necessity where the public health and safety will not be substantially
impaired.

2. Idling times for noise-generating equipment used in
demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes.

3. Demolition, construction, site preparation, and related activities within 70 feet from the edge of properties with existing, occupied noise-sensitive uses shall incorporate all feasible strategies to reduce noise exposure for noisesensitive uses, including: a. Provide written notice to all known occupied noisesensitive uses within 400 feet of the edge of the project site boundary at least 2 weeks prior to the start of each construction phase of the construction schedule;
b. Ensure that construction equipment is properly
maintained and equipped with noise control
components, such as mufflers, in accordance with
manufacturers’ specifications; c. Re-route construction equipment away from adjacent noise-sensitive uses;
d. Locate noisy construction equipment away from
surrounding noise-sensitive uses; e. Use sound aprons or temporary noise enclosures around noise-generating equipment;
f. Position storage of waste materials, earth, and other supplies in a manner that will function as a noise barrier for surrounding noise-sensitive uses;
Use the quietest practical type of equipment;
Use electric powered equipment instead of diesel or gasoline engine powered equipment; Use shrouding or shielding and intake and exhaust silencers/mufflers; and Fm
4-20
589
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4-21
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification
Responsible for
Verification
Status/Date/
Initials
i. Other effective and feasible strategies to reduce
construction noise exposure for surrounding noisesensitive uses.

NOS-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g.,

0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded.

Technical analysis required
prior to project approval.

City
MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Responsible for Status/Date/
Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Verification Initials i. Other effective and feasible strategies to reduce
construction noise exposure for surrounding noisesensitive uses. 4. For construction of buildings that require the installation of piles, an alternative to installation of piles by hammering shall be used. This could include the use of augured holes for cast-in-place piles, installation through vibration or hydraulic insertion, or another low-noise technique.

NOS-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving | Technical analysis required | City during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as | prior to project approval. historical resources, 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g.,

MoVal 2040 Revised Final Program EIR 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank.
4-22
591
Appendix B
Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment
Kimley»Horn
592
Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Analysis July 2026 City of Moreno Valley Page 1 of 13
Memorandum
To: Steve Quintanilla, Moreno Valley City Attorney
CC: Angelica Frausto-Lupo, City of Moreno Valley Community Development Director From: Noemi Wyss, AICP
Heidi Rous, CPP
Subject: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Analysis – Proposed Citywide Truck Routes Modifications Date: July 22, 2026
The City is currently updating its Circulation Element and adopting a new Truck Routes Map (the Project) that eliminates a multitude of truck routes or portions thereof to avoid sensitive receptors to the extent feasible. Figure 1: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet shows the City’s existing truck routes, Figure 2: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet shows the City’s remaining truck routes after modifications, and Figure 3: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet shows the City’s Truck Routes to be eliminated within the City’s boundaries. This memorandum documents the analysis conducted to evaluate the change in air quality and health risk as a result of the proposed truck routes modifications.

Methodology and Assumptions
The analysis was limited to the major roadways and truck trip origins within and outside the City that would be affected by the truck routes modifications. The truck routes modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. Rerouting truck trips to avoid sensitive receptors would increase the total truck vehicle miles traveled (VMT)1. KimleyHorn identified major truck routes in the City using the City’s Industrial iMap tool and Replica’s commercial vehicle traffic data. Replica’s commercial vehicle traffic data indicates that the following routes have the highest commercial vehicle daily truck traffic volume. As a result, the routes identified in Table 1: Daily Truck Traffic on Major Routes below were selected as part of the studied routes because they have the highest truck traffic volume within the industrial areas identified in the Industrial iMap tool. The table below shows the highest daily truck volume on a given segment on the corridor. 1 Kimley-Horn, Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis – Proposed Citywide Truck Routes Modifications, July 2026.

Kimley»Horn
Memorandum
To: Steve Quintanilla, Moreno Valley City Attorney
CC: Angelica Frausto-Lupo, City of Moreno Valley Community Development Director From: Noemi Wyss, AICP
Heidi Rous, CPP
Subject: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Analysis — Proposed Citywide Truck Routes Modifications Date: July 22, 2026
The City is currently updating its Circulation Element and adopting a new Truck Routes Map (the Project) that eliminates a multitude of truck routes or portions thereof to avoid sensitive receptors to the extent feasible. Figure1: ExistingTruck Routesand SensitiveReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet shows the City’sexisting truck routes, Figure 2: Proposed Truck Routes and SensitiveReceptors Within 1,000 Feet shows the City’s remaining truck routes after modifications, and Figure 3: Proposed ExistingTruck Routes to be Eliminated and SensitiveReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet shows the City’sTruck Routes to be eliminated within the City’s boundaries. This memorandum documents the analysis conducted to evaluate the change in air quality and health risk as a result of the proposed truck routes modifications.

Methodology and Assumptions
The analysis was limited to the major roadways and truck trip origins within and outside the City that would be affected by the truck routes modifications. The truck routes modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. Rerouting truck trips to avoid sensitive receptors would increase the total truck vehicle miles traveled (VMT)®. KimleyHorn identified major truck routes in the City using the City’s Industrial iMap tool and Replica’s commercial vehicle traffic data. Replica’s commercial vehicle traffic data indicates that the following routes have the highest commercial vehicle daily truck traffic volume. As a result, the routes identified in Table 1: Daily Truck Traffic on Major Routes below were selected as part of the studied routes because they have the highest truck traffic volume within the industrial areas identified in the Industrial iMap tool. The table below shows the highest daily truck volume on a given segment on the corridor. 1 Kimley-Horn, Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis —Proposed Citywide Truck Routes Modifications, July 2026.

Air Quality andHealth RiskAssessmentAnalysis July 2026
City of Moreno Valley Page1 of 13
593
Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Analysis July 2026 City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 13
Table 1: Daily Truck Traffic on Major Routes
Routes Maximum Daily Truck Traffic
Volumes
Perris Boulevard 1,671
Alessandro Boulevard 1,494
Frederick Street 1,362
Heacock Street 1,360
Cactus Avenue 1,297
Source: Replica, 2024; Kimley-Horn, Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, 2026.

This change in VMT corresponds to a change in traffic volumes along various roadways and freeways. To isolate the air quality and health risk changes attributable to the truck routes modifications, this analysis incorporates the changes to traffic volumes and VMT for Without Project Scenario (2024 GPU) (current truck routes) and With Project Scenario (proposed truck routes modifications) in the year 2040.

Air quality impacts were determined by modeling changes in mobile source emissions. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Depending upon the pollutant being discussed, the potential air quality impact may be of either regional or local concern. For example, reactive organic gases (ROGs), nitrogen oxides (NOX), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are all pollutants of regional concern. NOX and ROG/VOC2react with sunlight to form ozone (O3), known as photochemical smog. Additionally, wind currents readily transport PM10, and PM2.5.

However, carbon monoxide (CO) tends to be a localized pollutant, dispersing rapidly at the source.

Emissions were modeled based on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) computer model, EMFAC (Emission Factors) off-road inventory. The proposed truck routes modifications would increase truck VMT throughout the City, while the number of trips would remain the same. Therefore, the With Project Scenario increase in truck VMT was modeled in EMFAC2025 and EMFAC2021 with adjustment factors to determine the increase in criteria pollutant emissions. 3 Health risk assessment impacts were modeled using AERMOD4 by modifying the number of truck trips along study roadway segments. This change in truck trips was incorporated into the mobile source emission calculations and methodology from Section 4.3, Air Quality of the certified 2024 General Plan Update Revised Environmental Impact Report (Revised EIR). The change in truck trips include additional or fewer truck trips depending on the exact area or segment under consideration. 2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs or Reactive Organic Gases [ROG]) are hydrocarbons/organic gases that are formed solely of hydrogen and carbon. There are several subsets of organic gases including ROGs and VOCs. Both ROGs and VOCs are emitted from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons or other carbon-based fuels. The major sources of hydrocarbons are combustion engine exhaust, oil refineries, and oil-fueled power plants; other common sources are petroleum fuels, solvents, dry cleaning solutions, and paint (via evaporation). 3 This analysis considered EMFAC2021 with adjustment factors since that model was used in the 2024 GPU analysis. This analysis also incorporates EMFAC2025 (v2.1.0) released on March 4, 2026, as that is the latest emission inventory model released by CARB. On November 21, 2025 US EPA approved EMFAC2021 with adjustment factors but EMFAC2025 has not been formally approved by US EPA.
4 AERMOD is a steady-state, multiple-source, Gaussian dispersion model from US EPA designed for use with emission sources situated in terrain where ground elevations can exceed the stack heights of the emission sources. AERMOD estimates hourly concentrations for each source/receptor pair and calculates concentrations for user-specified averaging times, including an average concentration for the complete simulation period.

Kimley»Horn
Table 1: Daily Truck Traffic on Major Routes
Routes Maximum Daily Truck Traffic
Volumes
Perris Boulevard 1,671
Alessandro Boulevard 1,494
Frederick Street 1,362
Heacock Street 1,360
Cactus Avenue 1,297
Source: Replica, 2024; Kimley-Horn, Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, 2026.

Air quality impacts were determined by modeling changes in mobile source emissions. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Depending upon the pollutant being discussed, the potential air quality impact may be of either regional or local concern. For example, reactive organic gases (ROGs),nitrogen oxides (NOx),coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are all pollutants of regional concern. NOxand ROG/VOC? react with sunlight to form ozone (03), known as photochemical smog. Additionally, wind currents readily transport PM10, and PM2.5.

However, carbon monoxide (CO) tends to be a localized pollutant, dispersing rapidly at the source.

Health risk assessment impacts were modeled using AERMOD* by modifying the number of truck trips along study roadway segments. This change in truck trips was incorporated into the mobile source emission calculations and methodology from Section 4.3, Air Quality of the certified 2024 General Plan Update Revised Environmental Impact Report (Revised EIR). The change in truck trips include additional or fewer truck trips depending on the exact area or segment under consideration. 2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCsor Reactive Organic Gases [ROG]) are hydrocarbons/organic gases that are formed solely of hydrogen and carbon. There are several subsets of organic gases including ROGs and VOCs.Both ROGs and VOCs are emitted from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons or other carbon-based fuels. The major sources of hydrocarbons are combustion engine exhaust, oil refineries, and oil-fueled power plants; other common sources are petroleum fuels, solvents, dry cleaning solutions, and paint (via evaporation). 3 This analysis considered EMFAC2021with adjustment factors since that model was used in the 2024 GPU analysis. This analysis also incorporates EMFAC2025 {v2.1.0} released on March 4, 2026, as that is the latest emission inventory model released by CARB. On November 21, 2025 USEPAapproved EMFAC2021with adjustment factors but EMFAC2025 has not been formally approved by USEPA.
4 AERMODis a steady-state, multiple-source, Gaussian dispersion model from USEPAdesigned for use with emission sources situated in terrain where ground elevations can exceed the stack heights of the emission sources. AERMODestimates hourly concentrations for each source/receptor pair and calculates concentrations for user-specified averaging times, including an average concentration for the complete simulation period.

Air Quality andHealth RiskAssessmentAnalysis July 2026
City of Moreno Valley Page 2 of 13
594
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from existing Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Existing City Truck Routes
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care
FIGURE 1: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet

AIR QUALITY AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
—— >... r
-— Mountai Mou = 7 EL'CASCO
5 2 2
h & San Timoteo
[4 H Canyon = . RECHE, on, CY WN | “onrol 4 = | = _ T Tal, Norton M vj of I. Pp ) | HH I Younglove Gols ¥ < z IN i t +=! Reserve olrtgy
T 9 DZ Ry . “oe ~ J ¥ \ Sycamore J on] oh A 1 =
- Canyon > (= ps - To nw
EY Wilderness Park S CX 5% Ne d = FUCAYPTUSIAE ES
3 £0. OO He Ks : w Ea jo! >F ne g MASSE
= & NS C— 2 S
@ Ay S TR Giz 5 A x IDA Vet EVAN X oo Frere g
5 \ #7 AlEssANDRO BLYD, A Chemmmmm E Alessandro Blvd ol = nk Gian - = ov | A CACTUS AVE SN A)
2 Ps 2
Z \ JOHN FKENNEDY.OR 2 ©, KT jo, ~ 3 —
3 Nd prj —
RE PS 4 Be = AN Pr hye IE > y
» March Air \¢ Foe caicd 8
an Bd Reserve Base re g = oR
qa
\ x =, CER Lake Perris
! Of eg State
- £ 21Heki' Recreation Area
= ional Indian Museum
Laka _—
Legend
[1 City of MorenoValley [1 RR Rural Residential Il CEMU Center Mixed Use Hl PPublic V/) Sphere of Influence [1 R3 Residential Il COMU Corridor MixedUse Il OSParks/OpenSpace va) DisadvantagedCommunity (SB [__] R5 Residential Hl CCommercial Il FPFloodplain 535, SB 1000) Hl R10 Residential R/O Residential Office Sensitive |Receptors (1,000ft from 5 == Existing City Truck Routes Bl Ri5 Residential gm O/C Highway Office/ ing Truck Routes) 2 [+7] = National Network Route Bl R20 Residential Commercial [J] K-12School e 2040 Land Use I R30 Residential Hl O Office A Residential Care z [1 R1 Residential HR Hillside Residential — BP Business Park/Light A Hospital and Clinic N identi ndustria i .
[1 R2 Residential Il DC Downtown Center A 4 Child Care 0 05 1 2 Miles Il BFBusinessFlex | ® T *South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from existing Truck Routes FIGURE1: ExistingTruck Routes and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet

AIRQUALITYAND HEALTHRISKASSESSMENTANALYSIS
Kimley»Horn 595
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red al nds Blvd
Alessandro Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
60 10
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto Riv

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Remaining Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Remaining Truck Routes
World Logistics Center Specific
Plan Truck Routes
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 Ft from
Remaining Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care

STREET E STREET F

STREET B
FIGURE 2: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet

AIR QUALITY AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
-— _ y Box Springs Moun - Res Tg, EL CASCO
an EF
I) " & [| 3 a RECH v.
ig CIRN,N j= Teaon rol; = | T1013
a5 Fs Hi fii !
| ~ EC : == i + <Q 4
] 5 NUN Rr | -- eppa lll > CC E] | Sycamore a at = : Pht ~ = 2 a yy Wilderness Park >] KK 3 edi = SEED ears STR Pa 4Wi >< 2 FUCADRIUSAYE H 5
. vo Rg Ua WAS aX; =X Bt STREETEv SAN - KX Fs STH XIX AE i CZ | OU ana me Xo A VE AY ed 7 8-3 2 E = [Pa Wa A A . ES NEE fi E 2 EEY Ng WS." |" 57 AlEssaNDrRo BUD 2% mT 9
E Alessandro Blvd S382 a ro bl < —
CACTUS,CTUS AVE 2 rd OX ~ <= ’ 3 LOA KOR
% al ES; Z JOHN, KENNEDY.D @ 1
e. ®, £ i 8 o |
> hm YK] 2, ae HEP
a . : } wD » March Air 1 ASIEYCOLLEGE
n BIvd Reserve Base Smo OR &
i i a
\ 5 Lake Perris Ny ee State
N HS a'i Heki' Recreation Area
= ional Indian Museum
[1 City of MorenoValley 2040 Land Use [1 HRHillsideResidential Il BFBusinessFlex |, [ZA Sphereof Influence [1] R1 Residential I DC Downtown Center I PPublic by xa Disadvantaged Community [1 R2Residential (SB
535,SB1000)
= Remaining Truck Routes World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes == National Network Route [J RRRuralResidential
[J R3Residential
[J R5 Residential
Hl R10Residential
Hl R15Residential
Hl R20Residential
Il R30 Residential
Il CEMU Center Mixed Use
Il COMU Corridor Mixed Use
Hl CCommercial R/O Residential Office 1c a offs
Hl O Office BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
Il OSParks/OpenSpace
Hl FPFloodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 Ft from
Remaining Truck Routes) ® K-12 School A Residential Care A Hospital and Clinic A Child Care *South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Remaining Truck Routes Hansen Ave
Norton
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. Streets B, E, and F have not been constructed, but will be upon development of the World Logistics Center.

Morongo Younglove » Reserve Golf’Clut
CA
0 05 1 2 Miles

I I I I
FIGURE2: ProposedTruck Routes and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet

AIRQUALITYAND HEALTHRISKASSESSMENTANALYSIS
Kimley»Horn 596
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
10 Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Existing Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Proposed Existing Truck Route
To Be Eliminated
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care

FIGURE 3: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet

AIR QUALITY AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
- Box Springs
Moun,
a ~ \ " > a
- Res Te EL CASCO
Eb po
» & San Timoteo
[| 2 Canyon a % RECHE,
=X > I i al, Norton Moron
i g hs BA | HR @ VV / Younglove GolA
_m™ no _,] f, 4 eserve AY Toavew Ua 3 i 5 Sycamore eon! > A 3 10 Canyon (™ 7 pty lle = ” ors Wilderness Park AKG A 5 Melia \ XX I< om > BUCALYPTUSIIE a 2
d aS BR, Pi vw, ar =) (4 - El a arg va: g 5 25 Eig 2
en
2 csHWA? LNnid NS MO NS 2 YEa 3 Fe = SH < on fl TP 22 S 5 The har 7 AIESSANDROBLYD, 2 £ a TT x <8 E Alessandro Blvd . = A Sq 3 er re aid fo - -
2 CACTUS,AVE" J] PR x A 0)
2, A 2 EH B
Z \ JOHN, F*KENNEDY. Df on | E YN [®” | ar NA Ng FH
2 bm SH CoS N12 u
a 3 Ko > | ECE
» March Air AEE COLE
B n Bd Reserve Base WW 9 —3
} ;
\ S Lake Perris aa State
¥ - £ a'i Heki' Recreation Area
= ional Indian Museum
Legend _—
[1 City of Moreno Valley 2040 LandUse [J HRHillside Residential Il BFBusiness Flex | [// Sphereof Influence [1 R1Residential Hl DCDowntown Center Hl P Public by =x] DisadvantagedCommunity (5B [1 R2Residential Il CEMUCenter MixedUse Il OSParks/OpenSpace 535, SB 1000) [1 RR Rural Residential Il COMU Corridor Mixed Use I FPFloodplain I - ProposedExiting TruckRoute [J R3Residential Bl CCommercial SensitiveReceptors (1,000ft from E] CA National Network Route RS Residential R/O Residential Office Fisting Truck Routes) g I R10 Residential gm HO/CHighway Office/ ® K-12 School > I R15 Residential Commercial A ResidentialCare > Hl R20 Residential Hl © Office A Hospital and Clinic 0 05 1 2 Wii Hl R30Residential I BPBusinessPark/Light A Child Care . les Industrial I
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Existing Truck Routes FIGURE3: Proposed ExistingTruck Routes to BeEliminated and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet

AIRQUALITYAND HEALTHRISKASSESSMENTANALYSIS
Kimley»Horn 597
Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Analysis July 2026 City of Moreno Valley Page 6 of 13
Impact Analysis
As described above, modifications to the proposed truck routes under implementation of the Circulation Element Update of the 2024 GPU would result in an increase of mobile source emissions as VMT increases.

Shown below, Table 2: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040), presents the criteria air pollutant emissions for the Without Project Scenario (2024 GPU) (current truck routes) and With Project Scenario (proposed truck routes modifications) in the year 2040.

Table 2: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)1 Source
Maximum Pounds Per Day2
VOC NOX CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Without Project Scenario 2,748 2,936 27,936 78 6,069 1,552 With Project Scenario (EMFAC2025) 2,748 2,942 27,938 78 6,074 1,554 Net Increase <1 6 2 <1 5 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.2% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
With Project Scenario (EMFAC2021
with adjustment factors) 2,748 2,957 27,938 78 6,075 1,554 Net Increase <1 21 2 <1 6 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.7% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds; NOX = Nitrogen Oxides; CO = Carbon Monoxide; SOx = Sulfur Dioxide; PM10 = Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less; PM2.5 = Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less.

Moreno Valley City CouncilSeptember 1, 2026

Moreno Valley City Council
September 1, 2026