Agenda, regular meeting — Moreno Valley City Council, October 6, 2026 (part 6 of 11)

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-04717
RI-04788
RI-06887
RI-08235
RI-08681
RI-08802
RI-09080
RI-09083
RI-09225
RI-09667
NADB-R - 1086066
NADB-R - 1086150
Other - TC#18659-01
2002
2002
2006
2001
2011
2012
2014
2014
2014
2016
O'CONNELL, KEITH A.

CARVER, LARRYNN
Tetra Tech, Inc.

James E. Workman
Jay K. Sander
Bai "Tom" Tang, Michael
Hogan, Deirdre
Encarnacion, and Daniel
Ballester
Bai "Tom" Tang, Mariam
Dahdul, Daniek Ballester,
and Nina Gallardo
Bai "Tom" Tang, Mariam
Dahdul, Daniel Ballester,
and Nina Gallardo
Michael Hogan
Alexis Green
LETTER REPORT: RESULTS OF

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONDUCTED
AT PROPOSED "MORENO BEACH"

VERIZON WIRELESS TOWER SITE,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNAI

ROCK ART PRESERVATION AND
PROTECTION: LAKE PERRIS STATE

RECREATION AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
An Archaeological Survey of 4.5 Acres for the
Tentative Tract 33222 Moreno Valley Project
Loacted Near the Intersection of Alessandro
Blvd. and Merwin St., Moreno Valley,
Riverside County, California.

Cupules A Type of Petroglyphic Rock Art. A
Study of the Pitted Boulders in the San
Jacinto Wildlife Area and the Lake Perris
State Recreational Area
Archaeological Survey Report for Southern
California Edison's Grid Reliability and
Maintainance Project: Moreno Valley,
Riverside County, California
Phase | archaeological Assessment: Moreno
Master Drainage Plan Revision
Phase | Archaeological Assessment
Tentative Tract Map No.36739 City of Moreno
Valley Riverside County, California
Phase | Archaeological Assessment:

Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, City of
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Historical/ Archaeological Resources
Investigation; Tentative Tract Map 33222;
City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County,
California; CRM Tech Contract No. 2842
Addendum to FCC Form 620: Maltby/EnSite
#25566, 14058 Redlands Blvd., Moreno
Valley, Riverside County. CA 92555, EBI
Project # 6115002992, FCC E-106
#006956057, CASHPO:

URS, SANTA ANA

CA DEPT OF PARKS &

RECREATION, LAKE

PERRIS STATE

RECREATION
Indian Rock Art Specialist
Chambers Group, Inc.

CRM TECH

CRM TECH
CRM Tech
EBI Consulting
33-000012, 33-000021, 33-000062,
33-000331, 33-000419, 33-000421,
33-000452, 33-000464
33-000012, 33-000062, 33-000202,
33-000331, 33-000395, 33-000419,
33-000421, 33-000428, 33-000452,
33-000464

Page 3 of 4 ends

1064
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-10698 2015 Cultural Resources Survey Maltby / Ensite #25566 (284949) 14058 Redlands Boulevard,
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
92555
Other - 6115002992 Gabriel Ocampo EBI Consulting 33-002777

Page 4 of 4 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-10698 Other - 6115002992 2015 Gabriel Ocampo Cultural Resources Survey Maltby/ Ensite EBI Consulting 33-002777 #25566 (284949) 14058 Redlands Boulevard,
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
92555

Page 4 of 4 ends

1065
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-00414 1978 Environmental Impact Evaluation:

Archaeological Assessment of Two Portions
of Land in Moreno Valley, Riverside County,
California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riveside
NADB-R - 1080461; Thomas Holcomb
Voided - MF-0363
RI-01822 1984 EIR: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

OF THE PETTIT HILL SPECIFIC PLAN

DROVER, AUTHOR(S)
CHRISTOPHER E.
33-002863, 33-002864, 33-002865,
33-002866, 33-002867
NADB-R - 1082175;
Voided - MF-1969
RI-02097 1987 CULTURAL RESOURCES

RECONNAISSANCE OF THE MORENO

INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN PROPERETY, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (DATED 15
SEPTEMBER 1986)
NADB-R - 1082525; BISSELL, R.M. RMW PALEO 33-003340
Voided - MF-2290
RI-02105 1987 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
THE A.L.T.A. SPECIFIC PLAN, MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1082531; DROVER, C.E. AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2297
RI-02876 1990 REEVALUATION OF 10 ARCHAEOLOGICAL

SITES FOR THE CACTUS CORRIDOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 214, LOCATED IN THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT
ARKUSH, BROOKE S. 33-000860, 33-002775, 33-002776,
33-002777, 33-003343, 33-003344,
33-003345, 33-003346, 33-003347
NADB-R - 1083482;
Voided - MF-3076
RI-05288 2000 LETTER REPORT: RECORDS SEARCH

RESULTS FOR SPRINT PCS FACILITY
RV35XC093D (GOLF COURSE

MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

MICHAEL BRANDMAN
ASSOCIATES, Irvine, CA
NADB-R - 1086651 WHITE, LAURIE
RI-06644 2006 Letter Report: Proposed Cellular Tower
Project(s) in Riverside County, California, Site
Number(s)/ Name(s): CA-8393B/ Ashley
TCNS# 16652
NADB-R - 1088011; Carla Allred EarthTouch, Inc.

Submitter - JOB #CA8393B
RI-06754 2006 Cultural Resources Inventory, Lowe's Moreno Valley Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside
County, California
NADB-R - 1088123; Mary Robbins-Wade Affins
Submitter - Affins
Job No. 2147
RI-08689 2010 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit results for T-Mobile USA Candidate
IE25690-C (Cottonwood Park), 28590
Cottonwood Avenue, Moreno Valley,
Riverside County
Michael Brandman
Associates
Sarah A. Williams
RI-09652 2014 Cultural Resources Summary for the
Proposed Verizon Wireless, Inc., Property
Site, 27905 John F Kennedy Drive, Moreno
Valley, Riverside County, California 92555
Other - TCNS# Heather R. Puckett TetraTech Inc.
107863

Page 1 of 2 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-00414
RI-01822
RI-02097
RI-02105
RI-02876
RI-05288
RI-06644
RI-06754
RI-08689
RI-09652
NADB-R - 1080461;
Voided - MF-0363
NADB-R - 1082175;
Voided - MF-1969
NADB-R - 1082525;
Voided - MF-2290
NADB-R - 1082531;
Voided - MF-2297
NADB-R - 1083482;
Voided - MF-3076
NADB-R - 1086651
NADB-R - 1088011;
Submitter - JOB #CA8393B
NADB-R - 1088123;
Submitter - Affins
Job No. 2147
Other - TCNS#
107863
1978
1984
1987
1987
1990
2000
2006
2006
2010
2014
Thomas Holcomb

DROVER,
CHRISTOPHER E.

BISSELL, RM.

DROVER, C.E.

ARKUSH, BROOKE S.

WHITE, LAURIE
Carla Allred
Mary Robbins-Wade
Sarah A. Williams
Heather R. Puckett
Environmental Impact Evaluation:

Archaeological Assessment of Two Portions
of Land in Moreno Valley, Riverside County,
California
EIR: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

OF THE PETTIT HILL SPECIFIC PLAN

CULTURAL RESOURCES

RECONNAISSANCE OF THE MORENO

INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN PROPERETY, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (DATED 15
SEPTEMBER 1986)

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
THE A.L.T.A. SPECIFIC PLAN, MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
REEVALUATION OF 10 ARCHAEOLOGICAL

SITES FOR THE CACTUS CORRIDOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 214, LOCATED IN THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
LETTER REPORT: RECORDS SEARCH

RESULTS FOR SPRINT PCS FACILITY
RV35XC093D (GOLF COURSE

MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA
Letter Report: Proposed Cellular Tower
Project(s) in Riverside County, California, Site
Number(s) Name(s): CA-8393B/ Ashley
TCNS# 16652
Cultural Resources Inventory, Lowe's Moreno
Valley Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside
County, California
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit results for T-Mobile USA Candidate
IE25690-C (Cottonwood Park), 28590
Cottonwood Avenue, Moreno Valley,
Riverside County
Cultural Resources Summary for the
Proposed Verizon Wireless, Inc., Property
Site, 27905 John F Kennedy Drive, Moreno
Valley, Riverside County, California 92555
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riveside

AUTHOR(S)

RMW PALEO

AUTHOR(S)

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT

MICHAEL BRANDMAN
ASSOCIATES, Irvine, CA
EarthTouch, Inc.

Affins
Michael Brandman
Associates
TetraTech Inc.
33-002863, 33-002864, 33-002865,
33-002866, 33-002867
33-003340
33-000860, 33-002775, 33-002776,
33-002777, 33-003343, 33-003344,
33-003345, 33-003346, 33-003347

Page 1 of 2 ends

1066
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-10466 2018 Cultural Resources Investigation Moreno
MDP Line H-2 Project Area in the City of
Moreno Valey
Kristina Lindgren ECORP Consulting, Imc. 33-028580, 33-028581

Page 2 of 2 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-10466 2018 Kristina Lindgren Cultural Resources Investigation Moreno ECORP Consulting, Imc. 33-028580, 33-028581 MDP Line H-2 Project Area in the City of
Moreno Valey

Page 2 of 2 ends

1067
» Ly = tia 1 3 "J 8 F dl -
340 = X wv 7 ! ; CO ed
i -
u i
Z 2 a H .
vd | A ] £ f
f Pd, I"
: 11 —— ; -
DEEL og pas :
4 i -
#5
H AN |
f
[:] ad CC]Prorctarea
[] Records SaaccnBuller(12-mile) a az 08 1 CONSULTING 10681:20,000 £m wT Re TT TTT = = T
Z H : CEI i NE Ei
y = i : oly. FEST 5
- i ==
Ly I
0 4 1 r 2 ° I LS H
CY: - 0) i !
+
% ye
() ot
., — x
v 1
[3 1, i ES
- HE Lc
+ i A Es. ll mmm — he |
[CC] rroject Area
[CC] Recut SearchBuia (12-mde)
a ox
Ll. lL. ET i Oneters 0.8 1
YSGS7 stoleTrnyiSad,; 1
on = ff

MATERIAL NCCUCTURE

CONSULTING
as 1
1069130.000
a uss 7 iodo ZoryReac, §1
Fa
[0] mocordsSean: Butter{102-mide) MATERIALOALTURE 1070
1071
r-^ ■m.
/
RI-0182
1080232
it. -
" : • I ENV IRONMENTAL I f-IPACT EVALUAT 1 Oi
: r:
. ■ ■■
Archaeology of Brodiaea Avenue, PL 984
Water Systems Addition, Riverside County,
CaI i torn i a
by: Richard A. VJeaver
Archaeological Research Unit
University of Cal ifornia
Riverside, CA\ 92902
UCRARU ^182
CA-e.\V'SS^
A
for: Eastern Municipal Water District
24550 San Jacinto Street
Hemet, CA 92343
NOVEMBER 1975

SCANNED
8/Z^/ZOO?
Er aA i Shae fost a TE, SRR. hk
—_— RI-0182
1080232
EVALUATION: Archasclogy of Zrodiaea Avenue, PL 984
Water Systems Addition, Riverside County,
California _
Richard A. Weaver
Archaeological Research Unit
University of California
Riverside, C 92502
UCRARU #182
33-0008
CA-R\v-857
for: Eastern Municipal Water District
24550 San Jacinto Street
Hemet, CA 92343
NOVEMBER 1975

SCANNED
8/27/2009 1072
LOCATION AMO NATURE OF THE PRJJECr
At the request of the Eastern Cuniei isel ..ater District the staff of the i : 'Archaeological Research Unit (ARU) made an assessr.ent of the archaeoloqi ca I f hpsources in the area of the proposed water systenis additions in Riverside County. Previous studies in the vicinity have bean conducted by Lesl ie E.

Wj1desen (1974), and Helen Wel ls (1975) of the ARU. Archaeological resources found in these previous studies were located and mitigation procedures completed.

The present study assesses the proposed water systems additions in and around the cities of Sunnymead and Moreno. These area, which are designated on Map I, are general ly adjacent to roads and/or fence l ines.

ETHNOHISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The region under consideration was occupied aboriginal ly by the Luiseno and Cahui j la Indians, both of whom carried on a subsistence pattern based upon the hunting and gathering of wi ld foods (Kroeber 1970:620, 648). Main vi l lages were usual ly located at the base of hi l ls near surface water with access to several game and plant foods.

The seasonal round and settlement pattern of these two groups fol lowed a pattern simi lar to that of aboriginal southern Cal ifornia peoples. In early spring the primary activities were the gathering of tubers and greens supplemented by the hunting and trapping of rodents, deer and mountain sheep. Smal l temporary cmaps were establ ished in summer to gather avai lable plant seeds. Fal l was genera I ly characterized by the occupation of larger vi l lage sites. During this period the col lection of hol lyleaf cherry and acorns was the principal economic activity. Winter subsistence was based primari ly upon the uti l ization of stored foods (Bettinger 1974:17-18). These latter two seasons were characterized by a high degree of ceremonial and ritual activity.
oom tat

LOCATION AD NATURE OF THE PROJECT
AT the request of the Eastern Municipal .ater District the ctaff of thas + ‘Archaeological Research Unit (ARU) made =i assessmsnt of the archaeological ha resources in the area of the proposed water systems additions in Riverside County. Previous studies in the vicinity have been conducted by Leslie E.

Wjldesen. (1974), and Halen Wells (1975) of the ARU. Archaeological resources found in These previous studies werelocated and mitigation procedures completed.

The presamt study assesses the proposed water systems additions in and around the cities of Sunnymead and Moreno. These area, which are designated on Map I, are generally adjacent to roads and/or fencelines.

ETHNOH1STORICAL BACKGROUND
The region under consideration was occupied aboriginal ly by the Luiseno ~ and Cahuilia Indians, both of whom carried on a subsistence pattern based upon the hunting andgathering of wild foods (Kroeber 1970:620, 648). Main villages were usually located at the base of hills near surface water with access to several game and plant foods.

The seasonal round and settlement pattern of these two groups fol lowed a pattern similar to that of aboriginal southern California peoples. In carly spring the primary activities were the gathering of tubers and greens supplemented by the hunting and trapping of rodents, deer and mountain sheep. Small temporary cmaps were established in summer to gather available plant seeds. Fall was generally. characterized by the occupation of larger village sites. During this period the collection of hollyleaf cherry and acorns was the principal economic activity. Winter subsistence was based primarily upon the utilization of stored foods (Bettinger 1974:17-18). These latter two scasons were characterized by a high degree of ceremonial and ritual activity.
1073
2 This tyoe of settlement partern nay Pe r ■coari i/ed by the foi lowing types of archaeological remains: food waste, fragTentary or whole tools, manufacturing waste, concentrations or al ignments of stones, modification of bedrock surfaces, soi l discoloration or accumulation, or human skeletal remains.

Maps and records on fi le at the ARU were consulted prior to actual field investigation to determine if any known archaeological resources were located on the l ine. Although no sites are recorded, the records indicated that the project area had not been investigated by a trained archaeologist. The records also indicated that a number of archaeological sites have been located in the V i c i n i ty.

METHODOLOGY
On November 12, 1975, a crew of four persons conducted the field investigation for the proposed watdr systems additions. The fol lowing methodology was employed:
one person walked along either side of al l roads and fence! ines, atteinpting to survey a corridor approximately 25 meters wide. Since many of the roads were bordered by overgrown fields, the ground was frequently not visible beyond the road shoulder. Whenever possible al l rock outcrops and road cuts were also exami ned.

The land along most sections of the l ine hacf been previously modified by one or more of the fol lowing: agriculture, roads, housing, and dumps. Such activities usual ly make recognition of archaeological sites more difficult by either destroying the site or removing surface indications of buried sites.

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As a result of this reconnaissance, one site was located along the proposed pipel ine between Lassel le and Alison Streets. This site included 14 grinding This type of settlement pattern may be recognized by the following types of archaeological remains: food waste, fragrentary or whole tools, manufacturing waste, concentrations or alignments of stones, modification of bedrock surfaces, soil discoloration or accumulation, or human skelstal remains.

Maps and records on file at the ARU were consulted prior to actual field investigation to determine if any known archaeological resources were located on the line. Although.no sites are recorded, the records indicated that the project area had not been investigated by a trained archaeologist. The records also indicated that a number of archaeological sites have been located in the vicinity.

METHODOLOGY
On November 12, 1975, a crew of four persons conducted the field investigation for the proposed water systems additions. - The following methodology was employed:
one person walked along either side of all roads and fencelines, attempting to survey a corridor approximately 25 meters wide. Since many of the roads were bordered by overgrown fields, the ground was frequently not visible beyond the road shoul der. Whenever possible all rock outcrops and road cuts were also examined.

The {and along most sections of the line had been previously modified by one or more of the following: agriculture, roads, housing, and dumps. Such activities usually make recognition of archaeological sites more difficult by either destroying the site or removing surface indications of buried sites.

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDAT IONS
As a result of this reconnaissance, one site was located along the proposed pipeline between Lasselle and Nson Streets. This site included 14 grinding 1074
sl icks and ons bedrock tioriar. Ro":k siiei rers .vero also, located, but due to recent use and heavy overgro.vth no i r.c i ::5t i ens of aboriginal occupation were located.

There are two mitigation options open to the Eastern Municipal Water District: (i) mitigation through an effective program of professional recording, excavation, analysis and publ ication; and (2) relocation of the pipel ine to avoid impacting the site.

Option (I ) would consist of a three phase program (I ) mapping the location and extenx cf the site and recording each specific feature within the pipel ine right of way; (2) excavation of units within the area to be directly affected by construction - this would confirm or reject initial observations that no artifactuai debris is associated with the grinding features; and (3) analysis and publ ication of the results of this investigation. In the event that Phase (2) yields subsurface remains, the excavation phase would be expanded to derive an adequate sample of the archaeological deposit.

Option (2) would involve relocation of the pipel ine in order to avoid directly impacting the site. Pipel ine construction would not significantly affect archaeological resources, if this option is exercised. Relocation of the route should be done in consultation with an archaeologist to assure that this site and additional sites are not affected by the new al ignment.

SUMMARY
The proposed additions to the water system wi l l have no direct or indirect Impact on known archaeological resources if Option (2) is chosen. Unknown sites may exist beneath the surface or may be hidden by dense vegetation. sticks and onz2 b
owdrock mortar. Rote shaligrs ware 2lso located, but due to recent use and heavy overgrowth ns indizaticns of zboriginal occupation ware located.

There are two mitigation options opan to the Eastern Municipal Viater District: (h mitigation through an of fective program. of professional recording, excavation, analysis and publication; and (2) relocation of the pipeline to avoid impacting the site.

Option (1) would consist of a three phase program (1) mapping the location and extent of the site and recording each specific feature within the pipeline right of way; (2) excavation of units within the area to be directly affected by construction - this would confirm or reject initial observations that no artifactual debris is associated with the grinding features; and (3) analysis and publication of the results of this investigation. in the event that Phase (2) yields subsurface remains, the excavation phase would be expanded fo derive an adequate sample of the archaeological deposit.

Option (2) would involve relocation of the pipeline in order to avoid directly impacting the site. Pipeline construction would not significantly affect archaeological resources, if this option is exercised. Relocation of the route should be done in consultation with an archaeologist to assure that this site and additional sites are not affected by the new alignment.

SUMMARY
The proposed additions to the water system will have no direct or indirect impact on known archaeological resources if Option (2) is chosen. Unknown sites may exist beneath the surface or may be hidden by dense vegetation. 1075
Therefore, f>hou Id any cultural rnarvr ; -:! Le ur- .:c:. ered during the crrjrse of const ruct i Ofi, a quai ifiod arciiaoo log i st sf.ould bo consulteu i rniTiec i ate I y.

SOURCES CITED
Bettingar, Robert L.
1974 "Environment and Ethnography at Perris Reservoir" in Ferris Reservoir Archaeology: Late Prehistoric Change in Southeastern Cal ifornia, edited by James F. O'Connel i , et al.. State of Cal ifornia, Department of Parks and Recreation, Archaeological Report 14, Sacramento, 10-19.

A
Kroeber, A. L.
1970 Llandbook of the Indians of Cal ifornia. Cal ifornia Book Co. Ltd., BerkeIey.

ILC CI
EAN
Therefore, should any cultural mutter iz te unit.srel du =[5] -poe
[p]
[&] o5[9] ©
8}ty
construction, a qualified archasologist should Le consulted immediately.

SOURCES CITED
Bettinger, Robert L.
1974 "Environment and Ethnography at Perris Reservoir" in Perris Reservoir Archaeology: Late Prehistoric Change in“Southeastern California, edited by James F. O'Connell, et al., State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, Archaeological Report 14, Sacramento, 10-19. ~ Kroeber, A. L.
t970 tiandbook of the Indians of California. California Book Co. Ltd.

Berkeley.
»
1076
i'*.: " ? • ' ■•-• • v"'.
60 (/)
CO
cr
8 _i z
Aiessandro Blvd
Brodiaea Ave
EM WO
8 X3
2 QQ
Q. TftO
P «
rt?
BRODIAEA AVE. PL 984-

WATER SYSTEMS ADDITIONS

PIPELINE
SCALE 1-62500
CONTOUR INTERVAL 250'
r
N
I
BRODIAEA AVE. PL 984-

WATER SYSTEMS ADDITIONS
PIPELINE sesees
SCALE 1:62500
CONTOUR INTERVAL 250
1077

PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Moreno Master Drainage Plan Revision
City of Moreno Valley
Riverside County, California
For Submittal to:

Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Prepared for:

Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Prepared by:

CRM TECH
1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator
Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator
8802
^/I45
2012 #Roe
January 31, 2012 £/p
CRM TECH Contract No. 2564A

PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLANREVISION
City of Moreno Valley
Riverside County, California
For Submittal to:

Riverside County Flood Control and Water ConservationDistrict 1995Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Prepared for:

Albert A. Webb Associates
3788McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Preparedby:

CRM TECH
1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Bai "Tom" Tang,PrincipalInvestigator MichaelHogan,PrincipalInvestigator AR0621
Ir
January 31, 2012 Eic
CRM TECHContract No. 2564A
1078

NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION
Author(s): Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator/Historian Deirdre Encarnacion, Archaeologist/Report Writer
Daniel Ballester, Archaeologist/Field Director
Consulting Firm: CRM TECH
1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
(909) 824-6400
Date: January 31, 2012 (fieldwork completed on October 27 and November 1-3 and 8, 2011)
Title: Phase I Archaeological Assessment: Moreno Master Drainage Plan Revision, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California For Submittal to: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 955-1200
Prepared for: Sheryl DeGano
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
(951) 320-6034
USGS Quadrangle: Sunnymead, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle (various sections, T2-3S R2-3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian)
Project Size: Approximately 60 acres and 30 miles of linearrights-of-way Keywords: Moreno Valley area, Riverside County; Sites 33-015796 (historicperiod foundations and irrigation features) and 33-016655 (Kerr Stock Farm); no "historical resources" affected

NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASEINFORMATION
Author(s):

ConsultingFirm:

Date:

Title:

For Submittal to:

Prepared for:

USGS Quadrangle:

Project Size:

Keywords:

Bai"Tom"Tang,PrincipalInvestigator/Historian
DeirdreEncarnacién, Archaeologist/Report Writer
DanielBallester,Archaeologist/FieldDirector

CRM TECH
1016EastCooleyDrive,SuiteA/B
Colton, CA 92324
(909) 824-6400
January31,2012(fieldwork completedonOctober27andNovember 1-3and8,2011)
PhaseI ArchaeologicalAssessment:MorenoMasterDrainagePlan Revision, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Riverside County Flood Control and Water ConservationDistrict 1995Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 955-1200
SherylDeGano
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
(951) 320-6034
Sunnymead,Calif.,7.5'quadrangle(varioussections,T2-35R2-3W, SanBernardinoBaseline andMeridian)
Approximately 60 acresand 30miles of linear rights-of-way Moreno Valley area,Riverside County; Sites 33-015796(historicperiod foundations andirrigation features) and 33-016655 (Kerr Stock Farm);no "historicalresources" affected
1079

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Between October 2011 and January 2012, at the request of Albert A. Webb Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 60 acres of vacant land and 30 miles oflinear rights-of-way in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The project area for the study is generally located south of Vista Suelto Road, east of Lasselle Street, west of Theodore Street, and north of Iris Avenue, in various sections ofT2-3S R2-3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The study is part of the environmental review process for the proposed revisions to the previously adopted Moreno Master Drainage Plan, which call for the construction of open channels, storm drains, and basins. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD), as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

As a result of these research procedures, two previously recorded historicperiod sites were found to be lying partially within or adjacent to the APE.

Site 33-016655 represented the Kerr Stock Farm, an abandoned horse ranch, and Site 33-015796 represented the remains of a residential complex and associated irrigation features. The result of the field survey revealed that none of the features recorded in association with these two sites remains in existencetoday within or adjacent to the project area.

No other potential "historical resources" were encountered within or adjacent to the project area during this study. Therefore, CRM TECH recommends to the RCFCWCD a finding of No Impact regarding cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation isrecommended for the project unless construction plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by thisstudy. However, if buried cultural materials are encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds.

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Between October 2011 and January 2012, at the request of Albert A. Webb Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 60 acres of vacantland and 30miles of linearrights-of-way in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The project area for the study is generally located south of Vista Suelto Road, east of Lasselle Street, west of Theodore Street, and north of Iris Avenue, in various sections of T2-35R2-3W, SanBernardino Baseline and Meridian. The study is part of the environmental review process for the proposed revisions to the previously adopted Moreno Master Drainage Plan, which call for the construction of open channels, storm drains, and basins. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD), as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the CaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The purpose of the study is to provide the RCFCWCD with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposedproject would causesubstantial adversechanges to any "historicalresources," as definedby CEQA, that may exist in or around the project area. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out a systematic field survey. As a result of these research procedures, two previously recorded historicperiod sites were found to be lying partially within or adjacent to the APE.

No other potential "historical resources" were encountered within or adjacent to the project area during this study. Therefore, CRM TECH recommends to the RCFCWCD a finding of No Impact regarding cultural resources. No further cultural resourcesinvestigationis recommended for the project unless construction plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. However, if buried cultural materials are encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds.
1080

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY j
INTRODUCTION 1
SETTING ZZZZZ." 3
Current Natural Setting 3
Cultural Setting 3
Prehistoric Context 3
Ethnohistoric Context 4
Historic Context 4
RESEARCH METHODS ZZZZZZ"ZZ" 5
Records Search 5
Historical Research 6
Native American Participation 6
Field Survey 6
RESULTS AND FINDINGS .Z!"!!ZZZZ."!!ZZZZ" 7
Records Search 7
Historical Research 7
Native American Participation 10
Field Survey 10
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS 11
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11
CERTIFICATION 12
REFERENCES 13
APPENDIX 1: Personnel Qualifications 15
APPENDIX 2: Correspondencewith Native American Representatives 19

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project vicinity 1
Figure 2. Project area 2
Figure 3. Typical landscapes in the project area 3
Figure 4a. Previous cultural resources studies (1) 8
Figure 4b. Previous cultural resources studies (2) 9
11 TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY......ccovmmmrimniminsinsinsinsiesissssssssssnsssesssessssssssssssssossassssssssssssssessens i INTRODUCTION.......ummiiniriiininsessennessessasisssssssssiessessssassssssssssssessssessesesesssssssssssasssssessosssens1 SETTING... esses ess eses sess tssssssssssersas bes sessasss sass tassosssensesssssssesssssas essere eran 3 Current Natural SENG.......c.uvuuieiiiuieceeiseeerinsninsisis esses esissssssesesssssensesessessssssassssesens3 CUIULALSELENE ovr ities escent tse sse sets sess neess esses ssse sess sess se sns 3 Prehistoric CONEXt......uiuimmimiueeeniueissrnneississsnsienssesssssssssssesnscssessesosnssessssssssssssssssssssssseses3 EthNONIStOriC COMLEXE ...cuuvuueersemsernrrrrnrnsisnranssesssessesssessssssessesesssessesessssssssssssssessessssssosessens 4 HiSEOTICCOMLEXL.....eurernirincinisiisciininectsee resins esas seb sssssssssssecseereseseasesesssssessssasassessens4 RESEARCHMETHODS.........coiviimieienceneesinetnnnsissssesssessessssssssssssnssessasessnssesssssssssssssessesssens 5 RECOTAS SEAICTH......u.eetiirieinisiieieeteasier enna sss statesssesasaasessesreneesensesassesses5 Historical RESEArCh........cuuuiuiiieiiirceeiceetntcnneereesses scabs sesseeeestaseresmeses rans6 Native AmericanParticipation ..........occueuverecerenrccninrnninisninenesesssesissssssesssssssesssssssssasens 6 FIELASUIVEY ccc ssssetteecasasessassssasaesenaes6
RESULTSAND FINDINGS........cctisueeniuriecrensresensssssressssssesssrsssasssssssssssssssosssssesssssssessssssssssssssens7 RECOTAS SEAICHL........oiuiiritiriectierciicarniseessieitssss seesssstessa sareesassessesseenesessesssessssesssenssans7 Historical RESEAICHL........ccuiuiiiiiicuiicenineciseis resents sensesssssseseesseeeessesssnsesessesas sens7 Native AmericanParticipation .........c.cccvueirecencnriveninninensnnnseneneeseeessesessssessesesseessesssons 10 FILA SUIVEY runic sts sssabestsetsesess tesa assesssasseensssnenn10 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS........ccoeoeuriernrnniresnunsrissansssseessssessssmssssssssssssessssnenssessesesnns11 CONCLUSIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS.....coovoeoiurienrerirresereresesessisesessensessssesssessasseses 11 CERTIFICATION......cootitiiniiiiiieceiceccatisasisestsnnsssssresesessesessssssssssssssssssesssesssesnassesessnsesses 12 REFERENCES... essensess reeseassesssss sassassstssssssessnesnassnnens13 APPENDIX 1:Personnel QUalifiCations......cocuveereerveeeeeversrenrsreessessersssssesssesssssssssessessesssssessssssssn15 APPENDIX 2: Correspondence withNative AmericanRepresentatives............ccecueevunrenen.19

LIST OFFIGURES
Figure 1. Project VIGNItY......ccocecuiiieiiiiiicinicneccinnnessiensiese seen esses sensessssnesssonenenes1 Figure 2. Project rea.........ccocecerurerireneeuieneninininsesesissesesesesessssssssrsssssssssesesssssessesesnsesesesessssssssses2 Figure 3. Typical landscapesin the project area..........coccevivrerreereeiecereseeseserennsenssessssessecsnenes3 Figure 4a. Previous cultural resources StUAIEs (1).....ceeueeeecerreeereeeesrssssesssessssssssessssssssssossesses8 Figure 4b. Previous culturalresources StUAIES (2) c...cccoeerreeeeereisrereeressiseressessssssssssssesssssssssssses 9 ii 1081

INTRODUCTION
Between October 2011 and January 2012, at the requestofAlbert A. Webb Associates, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources studyon approximately 60 acres ofvacant land and 30 miles oflinear rights-of-way inthe City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (Fig. 1). The project area for thestudyis generally located south ofVista Suelto Road, east of Lasselle Street, west of Theodore Street, and north of Iris Avenue, in various sections of T2-3S R2-3W, SanBernardino Baseline and Meridian (Fig. 2).

The study ispartof the environmental review process for the proposed revisions to the previously adopted Moreno Master Drainage Plan, which seek to assess the drainage and flooding issues that affect the City ofMoreno Valley and adjacent unincorporated areas of Riverside County. Once the problems areidentified, solutions will be developed toprotect both existing land use and future development, including possibly the construction of open channels, storm drains, andbasins. The Riverside County Flood Control andWater Conservation District (RCFCWCD), as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, etseq.).

The purpose ofthe study is toprovide the RCFCWCD with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed projectwould cause substantial adverse changes to any "historical resources," as defined byCEQA, thatmay exist in or around the project area. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out a systematic field survey. The following report is a complete account of the methods, results, and final conclusion of the study.

San Bernardino Quad
~wm
=£==£ ';TBWfs»6f; <jk> "i Sen ""-* • ''V ••
mat\ h Santa Ana Quad.

Mt*V$it' :j
«It *V>--.
f cr~———i i
SCALE 1:250,000
5 10 miles
•X>'«*
^131*0... "iSf
Project
location
' ._ -. + •• • f'~ :•-:,-—
Figure1. Projectvicinity. (Based on USGS Santa Ana and San Bernardino,Calif., 1:250,000 quadrangles [USGS 1969; 1979])

INTRODUCTION
BetweenOctober2011andJanuary2012,at therequestof AlbertA. WebbAssociates,CRM TECHperformed a culturalresources study on approximately 60acres of vacantland and 30milesof linearrights-of-wayintheCity ofMorenoValley,RiversideCounty,California (Fig.1). Theprojectareafor thestudyis generallylocatedsouthof VistaSueltoRoad,east of Lasselle Street, west of Theodore Street, and north of Iris Avenue, in various sections of T2-3SR2-3W,SanBernardinoBaselineand Meridian (Fig. 2).

The study is part of the environmentalreview process for the proposed revisions to the previously adoptedMorenoMasterDrainagePlan,which seekto assess thedrainageand floodingissues that affect the City of Moreno Valley and adjacentunincorporated areasof Riverside County. Once the problems areidentified, solutions will be developed to protect both existingland useandfuture development,includingpossibly theconstructionof open channels,stormdrains,andbasins. TheRiversideCountyFloodControl andWater ConservationDistrict (RCFCWCD),astheleadagency for theproject,required thestudyin compliancewith theCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA;PRC§21000,et seq.).

Thepurposeof thestudyis toprovide the RCFCWCDwith thenecessaryinformation and analysis to determinewhethertheproposedprojectwould causesubstantialadverse changes to any "historicalresources,” asdefined by CEQA, that may exist in or around the project area. In order to identify and evaluate suchresources,CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeologicalresourcesrecords search,pursuedhistoricalbackgroundresearch, contactedNative Americanrepresentatives,and carriedout a systematic field survey. The following report is a complete accountof themethods,results, and final conclusion of the study.
- - > LE 2 se a wn Project | 7 i wz Se<location2
RY of “ PR -
- 0 Rs ! 9 sa [
SCALE 1:250,000
5 Figure 1. Project vicinity. (BasedonUSGSSantaAna and SanBernardino, Calif., 1:250,000quadrangles [USGS1969;1979])
1082

SETTING

CURRENT NATURAL SETTING
The project area is located on the eastern edge of the City of Moreno Valley, which occupies much of an inland valley bearing the same name. Itextends across the level plains of the valley floor from the southern base of the San Timoteo Badlands, a series of broken hills interspersed with numerous erosional channels, tothe northern slope of Mount Russell, an isolated graniticknoll, at elevations ranging around 1,500-1,960 feet above mean sea level.

The climate and environment of the surrounding area are typical ofthe southern California inland valleys, featuring an average annual rainfall of less than 12 inches and temperatures thatreach over 100 degrees Fahrenheit in summer and near freezing inwinter.

The project area lies within both paved roadways and open fields inarapidly urbanizing former agricultural area (Fig. 3). Soils in the vicinity consist ofgrayish-brown, mediumgrained sands with some decomposing granite near the hills and boulder outcrops. Past developments have removed almost all traces of the native landscape along the roadways, but some native vegetation was observed in the fields that have not been used for agriculture. Vegetation noted near the roadways consists mostly ofintroduced landscaping plants, while the rest oftheproject area hosts scattered growths of tumbleweeds, wildmustards, cottonwood, datura, and the typical small grasses and shrubs (Fig. 3).

CULTURAL SETTING
Prehistoric Context
It is widely acknowledged that human occupation in what is now the State of California began 8,000-12,000 years ago. In attempting to describe and understand the cultural processes that occurred in the ensuing years, archaeologists have developed a number of chronological frameworks thatendeavor tocorrelate the technological andcultural changes that are observable in archaeological records todistinct time periods. Unfortunately, none of these chronological frameworks has been widely accepted, and none has been developed Figure 3. Typical landscapes within the project area. Left: agricultural field at a proposed basin site; right:
drainage right-of-way along an existing roadway. (Photos taken on November2-3, 2011)

CURRENTNATURAL SETTING
Theproject areais locatedon theeasternedgeof theCity of Moreno Valley, which occupies much of aninland valleybearingthesamename. It extendsacrossthelevelplainsof the valley floor from thesouthernbaseof theSanTimoteoBadlands,a seriesof brokenhills interspersedwithnumerouserosionalchannels,to thenorthern slopeof Mount Russell,an isolated granitic knoll, at elevations ranging around 1,500-1,960feet above mean sealevel.

Theclimateandenvironmentof thesurroundingareaaretypical of thesouthernCalifornia inland valleys,featuring an averageannualrainfall of less than12inchesand temperatures that reach over 100degreesFahrenheit in summer and near freezingin winter.

The project arealies withinbothpaved roadways and open fields in a rapidly urbanizing former agriculturalarea(Fig.3). Soilsin thevicinity consistof grayish-brown,mediumgrained sandswith somedecomposing granite near the hills andboulder outcrops. Past developmentshaveremovedalmostall tracesof thenativelandscapealongtheroadways, but somenative vegetationwasobservedin thefields thathavenot beenusedfor agriculture. Vegetationnotedneartheroadways consistsmostly of introduced landscapingplants,while therestof theprojectareahostsscatteredgrowthsof tumbleweeds, wildmustards, cottonwood, datura, and the typical small grasses and shrubs (Fig.3).

CULTURAL SETTING
Prehistoric Context
It is widely acknowledgedthathumanoccupationin whatis now theStateof California began 8,000-12,000years ago. In attempting to describe and understand the cultural processesthat occurredin theensuingyears,archaeologistshavedevelopedanumber of chronologicalframeworksthat endeavorto correlatethetechnologicalandcultural changes that are observablein archaeologicalrecords to distinct time periods. Unfortunately, none of thesechronologicalframeworkshasbeenwidely accepted,andnonehasbeendeveloped Figure 3. Typical landscapes within the project area. Left:agricultural field at a proposed basin site;right: drainageright-of-way alonganexistingroadway. (Photos takenonNovember 2-3,2011) 1083
specifically for the so-called Inland Empire, the nearest ones being for the Colorado Desert and Peninsular Ranges area (Warren 1984) and forthe Mojave Desert (Warren and Crabtree 1986).

The development of an overall chronological framework for the region ishindered by the lack of distinct stratigraphic layers ofcultural sequences that could bedated byabsolute dating methods to provide concrete dates. Since results from archaeological investigations in this region have yettobe synthesized into an overall chronological framework, most archaeologists tend to follow a chronology adapted from a scheme developed by William J.

Wallacein 1955 and modified by others (Wallace 1955; 1978; Warren 1968; Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984; Moratto 1984). Although the beginning and ending dates of the different horizons orperiods may vary, the general framework of prehistory inthis region under this chronology consists ofthe following fourperiods:
• Early Hunting Stage (ca. 10000 B.C-6000 B.C.), which was characterized by human reliance onbig game animals, as evidenced bylarge, archaic-style projectile points and the relative lack of plant-processing artifacts; • Millingstone Horizon (ca. 6000 B.C-1000 A.D.), whenplantfoods and small game animals came to theforefront ofsubsistence strategy, and from which a large number of millingstones, especially well-made, deep-basin metates, were left; • Late Prehistoric Period (ca. 1000-1500 A.D.), during which a more complex social organization, a more diversified subsistence base—as evidenced by smallerprojectile points, expedient millingstones and, later, pottery—and regional cultures and tribal territories began to develop;
• Protohistoric Period (ca. 1500-1700s), whichushered in long-distance contact with Europeans, and thereby led to the Historic Period.

Ethnohistoric Context
The project area lies in an area where the traditional territories of three Native American groups overlap: the Serrano of the San Bernardino Mountains, the Luisefio of the PerrisElsinore region, and the Gabrielino of the SanGabriel Valley. Kroeber (1925:Plate 57) suggests that the Native Americans oftheRiverside areawere probably Luisefio, Reid (1968:8-9) states thatthey were Serrano, and Strong (1929:7-9, 275) claims thatthey were Gabrielino. In any case, there alsooccurred a late influx of Cahuilla during the 19th century (Bean 1978).

Whatever the linguistic affiliation, Native Americans in the Moreno Valley area exhibited similar socialorganization and resource procurement strategies. Villages were based on clan or lineage groups. Theirhome/base sites are marked by midden deposits, often with bedrockmortar/metate features. During theirseasonal rounds to exploit natural resources, small groups often ranged some distances in search ofspecific plants and animals. Theirgathering strategies oftenleftbehind signs ofspecial use sites, such as boulder slicks, at the locations of the resources.

Historic Context
In comparison to other nearbycommunities such asRiverside and SanJacinto, the Cityof Moreno Valley is a "late-boomer" both in early development in the 19thcentury and in specifically for theso-calledInlandEmpire,thenearestonesbeing for theColoradoDesert andPeninsularRangesarea(Warren1984)andfortheMojaveDesert(Warrenand Crabtree 1986).

Thedevelopmentof an overallchronologicalframework for theregionis hinderedby the lack of distinct stratigraphic layers of cultural sequences that could be datedby absolute datingmethodstoprovideconcretedates. Sinceresults fromarchaeologicalinvestigations in this region have yet tobe synthesizedinto an overall chronological framework, most archaeologists tend to follow a chronology adapted from a scheme developed by WilliamJ.

Wallacein1955andmodifiedby others (Wallace1955;1978;Warren1968;Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984;Moratto 1984). Although thebeginningandendingdatesof thedifferent horizonsor periodsmay vary, thegeneralframeworkof prehistoryin this regionunder this chronology consistsof thefollowing four periods:
* EarlyHuntingStage(ca.10000B.C.-6000B.C.),which wascharacterizedby human reliance onbig game animals, asevidenced by large, archaic-styleprojectile points and the relative lack of plant-processing artifacts;
* Millingstone Horizon(ca. 6000B.C.-1000A.D.), whenplant foods and small game animals came to the forefront of subsistence strategy, and from which alarge number of millingstones, especially well-made, deep-basinmetates, were left; * LatePrehistoric Period (ca.1000-1500A.D.), during which amore complex social organization,amorediversified subsistencebase—asevidencedby smallerprojectile points, expedient millingstones and, later, pottery—and regional cultures and tribal territories began to develop;
* Protohistoric Period (ca.1500-1700s),whichusheredin long-distance contact with Europeans,andtherebyled to theHistoric Period.

Ethnohistoric Context
Theprojectarealiesin anareawherethetraditional territoriesof threeNative American groupsoverlap:theSerranoof theSanBernardinoMountains,theLuisefioof thePerrisElsinoreregion,and theGabrielinoof theSanGabrielValley. Kroeber(1925:Plate57) suggests that theNative Americansof theRiversideareawereprobablyLuisefio,Reid (1968:8-9) states that they were Serrano,and Strong (1929:7-9,275) claims that they were Gabrielino. In any case,there also occurred alate influx of Cahuilla during the 19th century (Bean 1978).

Whateverthelinguistic affiliation,Native Americansin theMorenoValley areaexhibited similar social organization and resource procurement strategies. Villages werebased on clan or lineage groups. Their home/base sitesare markedby midden deposits, often with bedrockmortar/metate features. During their seasonalrounds to exploit natural resources, small groups often ranged some distancesin search of specific plants and animals. Their gatheringstrategiesoftenleftbehind signsof specialusesites,suchas boulder slicks,at thelocationsof theresources.

Historic Context
In comparisonto othernearby communitiessuchasRiversideandSanJacinto,theCity of MorenoValleyis a"late-boomer”bothin earlydevelopmentin the19thcentury andin 1084
urban growth inthe 20th. By the mid-19th century, the area that constitutes present-day Moreno Valley remained essentially uninhabited, despite itslocation ona grassy plain surrounded by several large Mexican land grants. In1853-1855, when the U.S. government initiated the first official landsurvey in southern California, theonly man-made features observed in the area were a few roads crisscrossing the desert floor, including awagon road from SanBernardino to Temecula, a second one leading to SanJacinto, and several unidentified roads or trails.

The Moreno Valley area remained unclaimed public landuntil 1870, when a large tract of 13,471 acreswas purchased from the U.S. government in one single transaction (BLM n.d.).

It was on this vast acquisition that the 11,560-acre Alessandro Tract and the town of Alessandro, where the March Air Reserve Base lies today, were laid out and offered to settlers in 1887 (Gunther 1984:11), during a land boom that swept through southern California in the 1880s. After this initial development scheme failed, thedevelopers of Redlands in San Bernardino County, fresh from their acclaimed success in creating theBear Valleyreservoir and the thriving Redlands colony, took over the Alessandro Tract with the intention of irrigating the land with an elaboratewater system (ibid.).

Water from theBear Valley reservoir reached theMoreno Valley area in 1891, ushering in a few years ofprosperity in the early 1890s. Two more communities came intobeingin the vicinity during this brief boom: New Haven, soon to be renamed Moreno, and Midland, also known as Armada (Gunther 1984:323, 333). However, the boom soon turned to bust during the drought of the late 1890s, whenBear Valley water was no longer delivered to theMoreno Valley area. As a result, the budding towns in the area became largely abandoned, and many of the buildings were taken up and moved to Riverside (ibid.:334).

During the early 20th century, the Moreno Valley areabegan to recover slowly. In 1912, a 1,100-acre portion of the original Alessandro Tractwasre-subdivided as the Sunnymead Orchard Tract (County Surveyor 1912), thus bestowing on the community formerly known as Midland or Armada the new name of Sunnymead. Eleven years later, a series of land development projectsbegan just to the west of Sunnymead, which ultimately resulted in the establishment of the community of Edgemont (Gunther 1984:171-172).

Despitethese development efforts, Moreno Valley's economic prospectwas severely hampered by the lack of reliable water supply until 1973, after the completion of the California Aqueduct and its southern terminus, Lake Perris (Gunther 1984:334). Since then, the promise of affordable housing brought an influx of commuters to the Moreno Valley area, setting off a period of rapid growth and urbanization. By 1984, when residents in the communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, and Edgemont voted to incorporate as the City of Moreno Valley, the new city had already become the second most populous in Riverside County (ibid.), thanks mainly to its attraction as a "bedroom community."

RESEARCH METHODS

RECORDS SEARCH
On October 3-4, 2011, CRM TECH archaeologist Nina Gallardo (see App. 1 for qualifications) conducted the historical/archaeological resources records search at the urban growthin the20th. By themid-19th century,the areathat constitutespresent-day MorenoValleyremainedessentiallyuninhabited,despiteits locationon agrassyplain surroundedby severallarge Mexicanland grants. In 1853-1855,when the U.S. government initiated thefirst official land surveyin southernCalifornia,theonly man-madefeatures observed in the area were a few roads crisscrossing the desert floor, including a wagon road from SanBernardino to Temecula, a secondone leading toSanJacinto,and several unidentifiedroadsor trails.

TheMorenoValley arearemainedunclaimedpublic landuntil 1870,when alarge tractof 13,471acreswas purchased from theU.S. government in one single transaction (BLMn.d.).

It wason this vastacquisitionthat the11,560-acreAlessandroTractandthe town of Alessandro, where the March Air Reserve Base lies today, were laid out and offered to settlersin 1887(Gunther 1984:11),during aland boom that swept through southern Californiain the1880s. After thisinitial development schemefailed,thedevelopersof RedlandsinSanBernardinoCounty,freshfrom their acclaimedsuccessin creatingtheBear Valleyreservoir andthe thrivingRedlandscolony,took overtheAlessandroTractwith the intention of irrigating theland with anelaboratewater system(ibid.).

Waterfrom theBearValleyreservoirreachedtheMorenoValley areain1891,usheringin a few yearsofprosperityin theearly1890s. Twomorecommunities cameintobeingin the vicinity during this brief boom:New Haven, soon to be renamed Moreno, and Midland, also known asArmada (Gunther 1984:323,333). However, theboom soon turned to bust during the drought of thelate 1890s,whenBearValley water wasno longer delivered to the Moreno Valley area. As aresult, thebudding towns in the areabecamelargely abandoned,andmany of thebuildings weretakenup andmoved toRiverside(ibid.:334).

During theearly 20thcentury,theMorenoValleyareabegantorecover slowly. In1912,a 1,100-acreportion of theoriginal AlessandroTractwasre-subdividedas theSunnymead OrchardTract(CountySurveyor1912),thusbestowingon the community formerly known as Midland or Armada the new name of Sunnymead. Eleven years later, a series of land development projectsbegan just to the west of Sunnymead,whichultimately resultedin the establishment of the community of Edgemont (Gunther 1984:171-172).

Despite thesedevelopment efforts, Moreno Valley's economicprospect was severely hampered by the lack of reliable water supply until1973,after the completion of the California Aqueduct andits southern terminus, Lake Perris (Gunther 1984:334). Since then, the promise of affordablehousing brought aninflux of commuters to the Moreno Valley area, setting off aperiod of rapid rowthand urbanization. By 1984,whenresidents in the communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, andEdgemont voted to incorporate as the City of Moreno Valley, the new city had already become the secondmost populous in Riverside County (ibid.), thanksmainly to its attraction as a "bedroom community."

RESEARCH METHODS

RECORDS SEARCH
OnOctober 3-4,2011,CRM TECH archaeologistNina Gallardo(seeApp.1 for qualifications) conductedthehistorical/archaeologicalresourcesrecords searchat the 1085
Eastern Information Center (EIC). Located on the campus of theUniversity ofCalifornia, Riverside, theEIC is theState ofCalifornia's official repository ofcultural resources records for Riverside County. During the records search, Gallardo examined maps and records on file at theEIC forpreviously identified cultural resources in or near the project areaand existing cultural resources reports pertaining to the vicinity. Previouslyidentified cultural resources include properties designated as California Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, or Riverside County Landmarks, as well as those listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the California Historical Resources Inventory.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Historical background research for this study was conducted by CRM TECH historian Bai "Tom" Tang (see App. 1 for qualifications) on the basis of published literature in local and regional history and historic maps of the Moreno Valley region. Among maps consulted for this study were the U.S. General LandOffice's (GLO) land surveyplat maps dated 1855- 1883 and the U.S. Geological Survey's(USGS) topographic maps dated 1901-1953. These maps are collected at the Science Libraryof the University of California, Riverside, and the California Desert District of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, located in Moreno Valley.

NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION
On October 6, 2011, CRM TECH submitted a written request to the State of California's Native American Heritage Commission for a records search in the commission's sacred lands file. Following the commission's recommendations, CRM TECH further contacted a total of 19 Native American representatives in the region in writing on November 1, 2011, to solicit local Native American input regarding possible cultural resources concerns over the proposed project. The correspondences between CRMTECH and the Native American representatives are attached to this report in Appendix 2.

FIELD SURVEY
On October 27, November 1-3, and November 8, 2011, CRMTECH archaeologists Daniel Ballester and Robert Porter (see App. 1 for qualifications) carried out the field survey of the project area. Since the proposed drainage alignments are mostly confined within the heavily disturbed rights-of-way of various existing public roadways, most of the survey was conducted at a reconnaissance level by driving along the project routes and visually inspecting the surrounding ground surface for any indications of potential cultural resources.

Along drainage alignments lying outside the existing roadway rights-of-way and at the proposed basin sites, a more intensive survey was conducted on foot by walking parallel transects spaced 15meter (approx. 50 feet) apart. In this way, the entire project area was systematically and carefully examined for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods (i.e., 50years or older). Since much of the project area lies under road pavement, visibilityof the native ground surface was generally poor, but was excellent (95%) in areas of cleared and unpaved land.

EasternInformationCenter(EIC). Locatedonthe campusof theUniversity of California, Riverside, theEIC is the Stateof California's officialrepository of culturalresourcesrecords for Riverside County. During the records search,Gallardo examined maps and records on file at theEIC for previously identified cultural resourcesin or near the project area and existing culturalresourcesreports pertaining to the vicinity. Previously identified cultural resourcesinclude properties designated asCalifornia HistoricalLandmarks,Points of HistoricalInterest, or Riverside County Landmarks, aswell as thoselistedin the National Register of Historic Places,theCaliforniaRegister ofHistoricalResources,or theCalifornia Historical ResourcesInventory.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Historicalbackgroundresearchfor this study was conductedby CRMTECHhistorianBai "Tom" Tang (seeApp. 1 for qualifications) on the basisof publishedliterature in local and regionalhistory andhistoricmapsof theMorenoValleyregion. Amongmapsconsulted for this study weretheU.S.GeneralLandOffice's(GLO)land surveyplat mapsdated1855- 1883and theU.S.GeologicalSurvey's(USGS)topographicmapsdated1901-1953. These maps are collected at the ScienceLibrary of the University of California, Riverside, and the CaliforniaDesertDistrict of the U.S.Bureau of Land Management,locatedin Moreno Valley.

NATIVE AMERICANPARTICIPATION
OnOctober 6, 2011,CRM TECH submitted a writtenrequest to the Stateof California's Native AmericanHeritage Commission for arecords searchin the commission's sacred lands file. Following the commission's recommendations, CRM TECH further contacted a total of 19Native American representativesin the regionin writing onNovember 1, 2011, to solicit local Native Americaninputregarding possible culturalresources concernsover the proposed project. The correspondencesbetween CRM TECH and the Native American representativesareattachedto thisreport inAppendix 2.

FIELD SURVEY
OnOctober 27,November 1-3,andNovember 8, 2011,CRM TECH archaeologistsDaniel Ballester andRobert Porter (seeApp.1 for qualifications) carried out the field survey of the project area. Sincethe proposed drainage alignments are mostly confined within the heavily disturbed rights-of-way of various existingpublic roadways, most of the survey was conducted at areconnaissancelevel by driving along the project routes and visually inspecting the surrounding ground surface for any indications of potential cultural resources.

Along drainage alignments lying outside the existingroadway rights-of-way and at the proposed basin sites, amore intensive survey was conducted on foot by walking parallel transects spaced15meter (approx. 50 feet) apart. In this way, the entire project areawas systematically and carefully examined for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods (i.e.,50 years or older). Sincemuch of the project arealies under road pavement, visibility of the native ground surface was generally poor,but was excellent (95%) in areas of cleared andunpaved land.
1086

RESULTS AND FINDINGS

RECORDS SEARCH
According toEIC records, morethan 70 cultural resources studieshavebeenpreviously completed within a one-mile radius ofthe project area (Figs. 4a, 4b). Although various portions of the project area were covered by these previous studies, the project area as a whole had not been surveyed systematically for cultural resources prior to this study. Also within the one-mile scope of therecords search, more than 160 historical /archaeological siteswere previously recorded into the California Historical Resources Information System.

Among them were some 50 historic-period sites, including buildings and groups of buildings, and 110 prehistoric sites and isolates, the majority of which were described as bedrock milling features.

The records search results further indicate that twohistoric-period sites, designated 33- 015796 and 33-016655, were found lying across or adjacent to the project area, both of them near the intersection of State Route 60 and Redlands Boulevard. Site 33-016655, known as the Kerr Stock Farm, was recorded as a potential historic district with a number of buildings, structures, and other features located on 120 acres on the east side of Redlands Boulevard and the south side ofState Route 60, the oldestbeing a Craftsman-style residence dating to the 1920s (Wills and Williams 2005). A small segment of the proposed drainage alignment, lying between Redlands Boulevard and Sinclair Street and north of Dracaea Avenue, extends into the site boundaries. The site was evaluated in 2005, and determined not to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (ibid.).

Site 33-015796 consisted of the remains of a pre-1929 residential complex, represented by abandoned structural foundations, and several irrigation features located on 70 acres on the west side of Redlands Boulevard, surrounded by segments of the proposed drainage alignments (McKenna 2006). None of the features recorded at the site, however, was found within the present project area. None of the other previously recorded sites or isolates was located in the immediate vicinity of the project area, and thus none of them requires further consideration during this study.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
While a wagon road is known to have crossed the southern portion of the project area in a generally east-west direction at least by the mid-1850s, when the U.S. government conducted the earliest official land surveys in the present-day Moreno Valley area, no other evidence of any human activities was found in the vicinity at that time (GLO 1855; 1876).

Four decades later, the area presented a very different landscape, featuring an extensive network of roads lined with scattered buildings, in a settlement pattern that was typical for rural areas in southern California, and clearlydemonstrating the results of growth during the latter half of the 19th century (USGS 1901).

RESULTSANDFINDINGS

RECORDSSEARCH
AccordingtoEICrecords,morethan70culturalresourcesstudieshavebeenpreviously completedwithinaone-mileradius of theprojectarea(Figs.4a,4b). Although various portions of the project areawere coveredby theseprevious studies, the project area as a whole had not been surveyed systematically for culturalresourcesprior to this study. Also within the one-mile scope of the records search,more than 160 historical/ archaeological sites were previously recorded into the CaliforniaHistorical ResourcesInformationSystem. Among them were some50historic-period sites,includingbuildings and groups of buildings, and110prehistoric sitesandisolates,themajority of which weredescribedas bedrock milling features.

Therecordssearchresultsfurtherindicatethat twohistoric-periodsites,designated33- 015796and 33-016655,were foundlying acrossor adjacentto theproject area,both of them near the intersection of State Route 60 and RedlandsBoulevard. Site 33-016655, known as the Kerr StockFarm, was recorded as apotential historic district with anumber of buildings, structures, and other featureslocated on120acreson the east side of Redlands Boulevard and the south side of StateRoute 60, the oldestbeing a Craftsman-style residencedating to the1920s(Wills andWilliams 2005). A small segmentof theproposed drainagealignment,lyingbetweenRedlandsBoulevardandSinclairStreetandnorth of Dracaea Avenue, extendsinto the siteboundaries. The site was evaluatedin 2005,and determined not to be eligible for listingin the CaliforniaRegister of Historical Resources (ibid.).

Site 33-015796consisted of the remains of a pre-1929residential complex, represented by abandoned structural foundations, and severalirrigation featureslocated on 70acreson the west side of RedlandsBoulevard, surroundedby segmentsof the proposed drainage alignments (McKenna 2006). None of the features recorded at the site, however, was found within the present project area. None of the other previously recorded sites or isolates was locatedintheimmediatevicinity of theprojectarea,and thusnoneof themrequires further considerationduring this study.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
While awagonroadis known tohavecrossedthesouthernportion of theprojectareain a generally east-westdirection at leastby themid-1850s, when the U.S. government conductedtheearliestofficial land surveysinthepresent-dayMorenoValleyarea,no other evidence of any human activities was foundin the vicinity at that time (GLO1855;1876).

Four decadeslater, the areapresented a very different landscape, featuring an extensive network of roads lined with scatteredbuildings, in a settlement pattern that was typical for rural areasin southernCalifornia,andclearly demonstratingtheresultsof growthduring thelatter half of the19thcentury (USGS1901).

During thefirst sixdecadesof the20thcentury,thearealong theprojectroute experienced slowbut steadygrowth, as shownby theincreasednumberof roadsandbuildings (USGS 1943;1953). By thelate 1930s,most of the streetsalong the projectroute had comeinto existence(USGS1943). Nevertheless,exceptfor thetiny town of Morenoat theintersection 7 1087
of Redlands Boulevard and Alessandro Boulevard, the area remained sparsely settled and rural in character throughout the historic period (USGS 1953). No buildings or other notable features were found at any of the proposed basin sites (USGS 1943; 1953).

NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION
In response to CRMTECH's inquiry, the Native American Heritage Commission reports in a letter dated October 10, 2011, that the sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources within the project area, but recommends that local Native American groups be contacted for further information. For that purpose, the commission provided a list of potential contacts in the region (see App. 2).

Upon receiving the commission's response, CRMTECH initiated correspondence with all 16 individuals on the referral list and the organizations they represent. In addition, Yvonne Markle, Environmental Office Manager for the Cahuilla Band of Indians, John Gomez, Jr., Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Steven Estrada, Environmental Director for the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, were also contacted. As of this time, only two responses have been received.

Shasta C. Gaughen, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer for the Pala Band of Mission Indians, responded in a letter dated November 7, 2011. In the letter, Ms. Gaughen states that the project area is located outside the Traditional Use Area of the Pala Band. On behalf of Tribal Chairman Robert Smith, Ms. Gaughen states that the Pala Band has no objection to the project and defers to tribes living closer to the project location (see App. 2).

In a letter dated November 10,Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Director for the Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians, states that the project location is highly sensitive for Native American cultural resources because of its close proximity to known Luisefio village sites and trade routes between the Luisefio and Cahuilla tribes. Therefore, Mr. Ontiveros requests further consultation with the project proponent and Native American monitoring of the project by a representative of the Soboba Band (see App. 2).

FIELD SURVEY
The systematic field survey of the project area produced completely negative results for potential cultural resources. The entire project area was closely inspected for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods, but none was found. Much of the area along the project route has been developed or redeveloped in recent years, resulting in extensive ground disturbances and, presumably, the loss of any archaeological remains on those properties.

No buildings, structures, features, or artifacts associated with the two historic-period sites previously recorded across or adjacent to the project area were observed during the survey.

The former location of Site 36-016655 is now mostly occupied by a group of newly completed warehouses, and the rest of the site area has also been disturbed, with none of the recorded buildings, structures, or features remaining in or near the project area. At Site 33-015796, it was confirmed that none of the recorded features was located within or adjacent to the project boundaries. In sum, no potential cultural resources more than 50 years of age were encountered during the survey.
10 of RedlandsBoulevard and AlessandroBoulevard, the arearemained sparsely settled and rural incharacterthroughoutthehistoricperiod (USGS1953). Nobuildings or other notablefeatureswerefound at anyof theproposedbasinsites (USGS1943;1953).

NATIVE AMERICANPARTICIPATION
In response to CRM TECH's inquiry, the Native AmericanHeritage Commissionreports in aletter datedOctober10,2011,that thesacredlandsrecordsearchidentifiedno Native American culturalresourceswithin the project area,but recommends that local Native Americangroupsbecontactedfor furtherinformation. For thatpurpose,thecommission provided alist of potential contactsintheregion(seeApp. 2).

Upon receiving the commission's response,CRM TECHinitiated correspondencewith all 16individuals on thereferral list and the organizations they represent. In addition, Yvonne Markle,Environmental Office Manager for the CahuillaBand of Indians, JohnGomez, Jr., Cultural ResourcesCoordinator for the Ramona Band of CahuillaIndians, and Steven Estrada, Environmental Director for the Santa RosaBand of CahuillaIndians, were also contacted. Asof this time,only two responseshavebeenreceived.

ShastaC.Gaughen,TribalHistoric PreservationOfficerfor thePalaBandof Mission Indians,respondedin aletter datedNovember7,2011. Intheletter,Ms.Gaughenstates that theprojectareais locatedoutsidetheTraditionalUseAreaof thePalaBand. Onbehalf of Tribal ChairmanRobertSmith, Ms. Gaughenstates that thePalaBand hasno objection to the project and defers to tribes living closer to the project location (seeApp. 2).

In aletter dated November 10,JosephOntiveros, CulturalResourceDirector for the Soboba Bandof LuisefioIndians, statesthat theprojectlocationis highly sensitivefor Native American culturalresourcesbecauseof its closeproximity to knownLuisefio village sites and trade routes between the Luisefio and Cahuilla tribes. Therefore, Mr. Ontiveros requests further consultationwith theprojectproponentandNative Americanmonitoring of the project by arepresentative of the SobobaBand (seeApp. 2).

FIELD SURVEY
The systematic field survey of the project areaproduced completely negativeresults for potential culturalresources. The entire project area was closely inspected for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic periods,but none was found. Much of theareaalongtheprojectroutehasbeendevelopedor redevelopedinrecent years, resultingin extensive ground disturbances and, presumably, the loss of any archaeological remainson thoseproperties.

No buildings, structures, features, or artifacts associated with the twohistoric-period sites previously recorded acrossor adjacent to theproject areawere observed during the survey.

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The purpose of this study is to identify any cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area, and to assist the RCFCWCD in determining whether such resources meet the official definition of "historical resources," as provided in the California Public Resources Code, in particular CEQA.

According to PRC §5020.1(j), '"historical resource' includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California." More specifically, CEQA guidelines state that the term "historicalresources" applies to any such resources listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register of historical resources, or determined to be historically significant by the Lead Agency (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(l)-(3)).

Regarding the proper criteria for the evaluation of historical significance, CEQA guidelines mandate that "a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be 'historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources" (Title 14 CCR§15064.5(a)(3)). A resource may be listed in the California Register if it meets any of the following criteria:
(1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage.
(2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.
(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (PRC §5024.1(c))
In summary of the research results discussed above, while two previously recorded historic-period sites, 33-015796 and 36-016655, were identified as lying partially within or adjacent to the project area, none of the features associated with Site 33-015796 was located within or immediately adjacent to the project boundaries. Site 36-016655, which was previously determined not to be eligible for the California Register, is no longer in existence today, at least in the project vicinity. No other potential "historical resources" were encountered throughout the course of the study. Based on these findings, and in light of the criteria listed above, the present report concludes that nohistorical resources exist within the project area.

According to PRC §5020.1(j), "historical resource’ includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, site,area,place,record,or manuscriptwhichishistorically or archaeologically significant,oris significantin thearchitectural,engineering,scientific,economic, agricultural, educational, social,political, military, or cultural annals of California." More specifically,CEQAguidelines statethat the term"historicalresources"applies to any such resourceslistedin or determined to be eligible for listingin the California Register of Historical Resources,includedin alocalregister of historicalresources, or determined tobe historically significant by the Lead Agency (Title 14CCR §15064.5(a)(1)-(3)).

Regardingtheproper criteriafor theevaluationof historical significance,CEQAguidelines mandatethat"aresourceshallbeconsideredby thelead agency tobe "historically significant’ if the resource meets the criteria for listing on theCalifornia Register of Historical Resources” (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(3)). A resource may be listedin the CaliforniaRegisterif it meets any of the following criteria:
(1) Is associatedwith events thathavemadea significantcontributionto thebroadpatterns of California's history and cultural heritage.
(2) Is associatedwith the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodiesthe distinctivecharacteristicsof atype,period,region,or methodof construction, or representsthe work of animportant creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.
(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield,informationimportant in prehistory or history. (PRC §5024.1(c))
In summary of theresearchresults discussedabove,while two previously recorded historic-period sites,33-015796and 36-016655,were identified aslyingpartially within or adjacentto theprojectarea,noneof thefeaturesassociatedwithSite33-015796waslocated within or immediately adjacentto theprojectboundaries. Site36-016655,which was previously determinednot to be eligible for the California Register,is no longer in existencetoday, at leastin the project vicinity. No other potential "historicalresources" were encountered throughout the course of the study. Basedon thesefindings, andin light of the criterialisted above,thepresentreport concludes that nohistoricalresourcesexist within theprojectarea.

CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Date: January 31, 2012 Signed:

Name: Bai "Tom" Tang
County Registration No.: 114
12 In summaryof theresearchresultsoutlined above,no "historicalresources,"asdefinedby CEQA,areknown to existwithin theprojectarea. Therefore,CRMTECHpresentsthe followingrecommendations to the RCFCWCD:
* The project as currently proposed will not causea substantial adverse change to any knownhistoricalresources.
* No further culturalresourcesinvestigationis necessary for the proposed project unless constructionplans undergo such changesas to include areasnot covered by this study. * If buried cultural materials are discovered during any earth-moving operations associatedwith theproject,all work in that areashouldbehalted or diverteduntil a qualified archaeologistcanevaluatethenatureandsignificanceof thefinds.

CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished aboveandin the attachedexhibitspresentthedataandinformationrequired for this archaeological report, and that the facts,statements,andinformationpresentedaretrue andcorrectto thebestof my knowledgeandbelief.

Date:_January 31, 2012 Signed:

Name:_Bai "Tom" Tang
County Registration No.:_114
12 1090

REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell John
1978 Cahuilla. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by Robert F. Heizer; pp. 575-587. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

BLM (Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior) n.d. Online database of U.S. land patents. Http:/ / www.glorecords.blm.gov.

Chartkoff, Joseph L., and Kerry Kona Chartkoff
1984 The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

County Surveyor, Riverside
1912 Plat map of the Sunnymead Orchard Tract; Map Book 9, Page 17. Microfiche on file, Riverside County Surveyor's Office, Riverside.

GLO (General Land Office, U.S.Department of the Interior) 1855 Plat Map: Township No. 3 South Range No. 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyed in 1853-1855.
1876 Plat Map: Township No. 2 South Range No. 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyed in 1853-1876.

Gunther, Jane Davies
1984 Riverside County, California, Place Names: Their Origins andTheir Stories. J. D.

Gunther, Riverside.

Kroeber, Alfred L.
1925 Handbook ofthe Indians ofCalifornia. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.

Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

McKenna, Jeanette
2006 California Historical Resources Information System site record forms, 33-015796.

On file, Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside.

Moratto, Michael J. (ed.)
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando, Horida.

Reid, Hugo
1968 The Indians of Los Angeles County: Hugo Reid's Letters of 1852;edited by Robert F. Heizer. Southwest Museum Papers 21.

Strong, William Duncan
1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26. Reprinted by Malki Museum Press, Banning, California, 1972.

USGS (United States Geological Survey, U.S.Department of the Interior) 1901 Map: Elsinore, Calif. (30', 1:125,000); surveyed in 1897-1898. 1943 Map: Perris, Calif. (15', 1:62,500); aerial photographs taken in 1939. 13 REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell John
1978 Cahuilla. InHandbookofNorthAmericanIndians,Vol. 8:California,editedby RobertF.Heizer;pp. 575-587. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington,D.C.

BLM (Bureau of Land Management, U.S.Department of the Interior) n.d. Online databaseof U.S.land patents. Http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

Chartkoff,JosephL., andKerryKonaChartkoff
1984 TheArchaeologyofCalifornia. Stanford University Press,Stanford, California.

County Surveyor, Riverside
1912 Platmap of theSunnymeadOrchardTract;MapBook9,Page17. Microficheon file, Riverside County Surveyor's Office, Riverside.

GLO (GeneralLand Office, U.S.Department of theInterior) 1855 PlatMap: TownshipNo. 3SouthRangeNo. 3West,SanBernardinoMeridian; surveyedin 1853-1855.
1876 PlatMap: TownshipNo. 2SouthRangeNo. 3West,SanBernardinoMeridian; surveyedin 1853-1876.

Gunther, JaneDavies
1984 Riverside County, California,PlaceNames: Their Origins and Their Stories. J.D.

Gunther, Riverside.

Kroeber, AlfredL.
1925 Handbookof theIndiansofCalifornia. Bureau of AmericanEthnologyBulletin 78.

GovernmentPrintingOffice,Washington,D.C.

McKenna, Jeanette
2006 CaliforniaHistorical ResourcesInformationSystem site record forms, 33-015796.

On file,EasternInformationCenter,University of California, Riverside.

Moratto, Michael J.(ed.)
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

Reid, Hugo
1968 TheIndians of Los AngelesCounty:HugoReid'sLettersof 1852;editedby RobertF.Heizer. SouthwestMuseumPapers21.

Strong, WilliamDuncan
1929 Aboriginal Societyin SouthernCalifornia. University of CaliforniaPublications in American Archaeology andEthnology 26. Reprintedby MalkiMuseum Press,Banning, California, 1972.

USGS(UnitedStatesGeologicalSurvey,U.S.Departmentof theInterior) 1901 Map: Elsinore, Calif. (30', 1:125,000); surveyedin 1897-1898. 1943 Map:Perris,Calif.(15',1:62,500);aerialphotographs takenin1939. 13 1091
1953 Map: Sunnymead, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000); aerial photographs taken in 1951, fieldchecked in 1953. 1969 Map: San Bernardino, Calif. (1:250,000); 1958 edition revised. 1979 Map: Santa Ana, Calif. (1:250,000); 1959 edition revised. 1980 Map: Sunnymead, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000); 1967edition photoinspected in 1973; photorevised in 1980
Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.

Southwestern Journal ofArchaeology ll(3):214-230.
1978 Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9,000 to 2,000 BC. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 8, California, edited by Robert F. Heizer; pp. 25-36. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Warren, Claude N.
1968 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptations on the Southern California Coast.

In Archaic Prehistory in Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams; pp. 1-

14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales, New Mexico.
1984 The Desert Region. In California Archaeology, edited by Michael J. Moratto; pp. 339-430. Academic Press, Orlando, Horida.

Warren, Claude N., and Robert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory of the Southwestern Area. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 11: Great Basin, edited by Warren L. D'Azevedo; pp. 183-193. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Wills, C, and S. Williams
2005 California Historical Resources Information System site record forms, 33-016655.

On file, Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. 14 1953 Map: Sunnymead,Calif. (7.5',1:24,000);aerialphotographs takenin 1951,fieldcheckedin1953. 1969 Map: SanBernardino, Calif. (1:250,000); 1958 editionrevised. 1979 Map:Santa Ana, Calif. (1:250,000); 1959 editionrevised. 1980 Map: Sunnymead,Calif. (7.5',1:24,000);1967editionphotoinspectedin1973; photorevisedin1980
Wallace, William J.
1955 A SuggestedChronology for SouthernCaliforniaCoastalArchaeology.

SouthwesternJournalofArchaeology11(3):214-230.
1978 Post-PleistoceneArcheology,9,000to 2,000BC. InHandbookofNorthAmerican Indians,Vol. 8,California,editedby RobertF.Heizer;pp. 25-36. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington,D.C.

Warren, ClaudeN.
1968 Cultural Traditions andEcological Adaptations on the Southern California Coast.

In ArchaicPrehistoryin WesternUnitedStates,editedby CynthiaIrwin-Williams;pp.1-

14. EasternNew Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales, New Mexico.
1984 TheDesertRegion. InCaliforniaArchaeology,editedby MichaelJ.Moratto;pp. 339-430. Academic Press,Orlando, Florida.

Warren, ClaudeN., and RobertH. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory of the SouthwesternArea. In HandbookofNorth AmericanIndians,Vol. 11:GreatBasin,editedby WarrenL.D'Azevedo;pp. 183-193. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington,D.C.

Wills, C., and S. Williams
2005 California Historical Resources InformationSystem site record forms, 33-016655.

On file,EasternInformationCenter,University of California,Riverside. 14 1092
Education
APPENDIX 1:

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/HISTORIAN
Bai "Tom" Tang, M.A.
1988-1993 Graduate Program in Public History/Historic Preservation, UC Riverside. 1987 M.A., American History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 1982 B.A., History, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China. 2000 "Introduction to Section 106Review," presented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the University of Nevada, Reno. 1994 "Assessing the Significance of Historic Archaeological Sites," presented by the Historic Preservation Program, University of Nevada, Reno.

Professional Experience
2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1993-2002 Project Historian/ Architectural Historian, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-1997 Project Historian, Greenwood and Associates, Pacific Palisades, California. 1991-1993 Project Historian, Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside. 1990 Intern Researcher, California State Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.
1990-1992 Teaching Assistant, History of Modern World, UC Riverside. 1988-1993 Research Assistant, American Social History, UC Riverside. 1985-1988 Research Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1985-1986 Teaching Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1982-1985 Lecturer, History, Xi'an Foreign Languages Institute, Xi'an, China.

Honors and Awards
1988-1990 University of California Graduate Fellowship, UC Riverside. 1985-1987 Yale University Fellowship, Yale University Graduate School. 1980, 1981 President's Honor List, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Preliminary Analyses and Recommendations Regarding California's Cultural Resources Inventory System (with Special Reference to Condition 14 of NPS 1990 Program Review Report). California State Office of Historic Preservation working paper, Sacramento, September 1990.

Numerous cultural resources management reports with the Archaeological Research Unit, Greenwood and Associates, and CRM TECH, since October 1991.

Membership
California Preservation Foundation.
15 APPENDIX1:

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/HISTORIAN
Bai"Tom" Tang,M.A.

Education
1988-1993 GraduateProgramin Public History /HistoricPreservation, UCRiverside. 1987 M.A., AmericanHistory, Yale University,New Haven, Connecticut. 1982 B.A,History,NorthwesternUniversity, Xi'an,China.
2000 "Introduction toSection106Review,"presentedby theAdvisory Councilon Historic Preservation and the University of Nevada, Reno. 1994 "Assessingthe Significance of Historic Archaeological Sites,"presentedby the Historic PreservationProgram,University of Nevada, Reno.

ProfessionalExperience
2002- PrincipalInvestigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1993-2002 ProjectHistorian/ ArchitecturalHistorian, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-1997 Project Historian, Greenwood and Associates,Pacific Palisades,California. 1991-1993 ProjectHistorian, ArchaeologicalResearchUnit, UC Riverside. 1990 Intern Researcher, California State Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.
1990-1992 Teaching Assistant,History of Modern World, UCRiverside. 1988-1993 ResearchAssistant, AmericanSocialHistory, UC Riverside. 1985-1988 ResearchAssistant,Modern ChineseHistory, YaleUniversity. 1985-1986 Teaching Assistant, Modern ChineseHistory, YaleUniversity. 1982-1985 Lecturer, History, Xi'anForeignLanguages Institute, Xi'an, China.

Honors and Awards
1988-1990 University of CaliforniaGraduateFellowship,UCRiverside. 1985-1987 YaleUniversityFellowship,YaleUniversity GraduateSchool. 1980, 1981 President's Honor List, NorthwesternUniversity, Xi'an, China.

Cultural ResourcesManagement Reports
Preliminary Analyses andRecommendations Regarding California's Cultural Resources Inventory System(withSpecialReference to Condition 14 of NPS1990ProgramReview Report). CaliforniaStateOffice of Historic Preservation workingpaper, Sacramento, September 1990.

Numerous culturalresourcesmanagementreports with the ArchaeologicalResearchUnit, Greenwood and Associates,and CRM TECH, sinceOctober 1991.

Membership
CaliforniaPreservationFoundation.
15 1093
Education

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/ARCHAEOLOGIST
Michael Hogan, Ph.D., RPA*
1991 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. 1981 B.S., Anthropology, University of California, Riverside; with honors. 1980-1981 Education Abroad Program, Lima, Peru.
2002 Section 106—National Historic Preservation Act: Federal Law at the Local Level. UCLA Extension Course #888.
2002 "Recognizing Historic Artifacts," workshop presented by Richard Norwood, Historical Archaeologist.
2002 "Wending Your Way through the Regulatory Maze," symposium presented by the Association of Environmental Professionals.
1992 "Southern California Ceramics Workshop," presented by Jerry Schaefer. 1992 "Historic Artifact Workshop," presented by Anne Duffield-Stoll.

Professional Experience
2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1999-2002 Project Archaeologist/ Field Director, CRM TECH, Riverside. 1996-1998 Project Director and Ethnographer, Statistical Research, Inc., Redlands. 1992-1998 Assistant Research Anthropologist, University of California, Riverside 1992-1995 Project Director, Archaeological Research Unit, U. C. Riverside. 1993-1994 Adjunct Professor, Riverside Community College, Mt. San Jacinto College, U.C. Riverside, Chapman University, and San Bernardino Valley College. 1991-1992 Crew Chief, Archaeological Research Unit, U. C. Riverside. 1984-1998 Archaeological Technician, Field Director, and Project Director for various southern California cultural resources management firms.

Research Interests
Cultural Resource Management, Southern Californian Archaeology, Settlement and Exchange Patterns, Specialization and Stratification, Culture Change, Native American Culture, Cultural Diversity.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Author and co-author of, contributor to, and principal investigator for numerous cultural resources management study reports since 1986.

Memberships
*Register of Professional Archaeologists.

Society for American Archaeology.

Societyfor California Archaeology.

Pacific Coast Archaeological Society.

Coachella Valley Archaeological Society.
16 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/ARCHAEOLOGIST
MichaelHogan,Ph.D.,RPA*
Education
1991 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. 1981 B.S.,Anthropology,University of California,Riverside;withhonors. 1980-1981 Education AbroadProgram, Lima,Peru.
2002 Section106—National Historic PreservationAct:FederalLaw at the Local Level. UCLA Extension Course #888.
2002 "RecognizingHistoric Artifacts," workshop presented by RichardNorwood, Historical Archaeologist.
2002 "WendingYourWay throughtheRegulatoryMaze," symposiumpresented by theAssociationofEnvironmentalProfessionals.
1992 "SouthernCaliforniaCeramicsWorkshop,"presentedby JerrySchaefer. 1992 "Historic Artifact Workshop," presentedby Anne Duffield-Stoll.

ProfessionalExperience
2002- PrincipalInvestigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1999-2002 Project Archaeologist/FieldDirector, CRM TECH, Riverside. 1996-1998 ProjectDirector andEthnographer,StatisticalResearch,Inc.,Redlands. 1992-1998 Assistant Research Anthropologist, University of California, Riverside 1992-1995 Project Director, Archaeological ResearchUnit, U. C. Riverside. 1993-1994 Adjunct Professor,Riverside Community College,Mt. SanJacintoCollege, U.C. Riverside, ChapmanUniversity, and SanBernardino Valley College. 1991-1992 Crew Chief, Archaeological ResearchUnit, U. C. Riverside. 1984-1998 ArchaeologicalTechnician,FieldDirector, andProjectDirector for various southern California culturalresourcesmanagement firms.

ResearchInterests
Cultural ResourceManagement,SouthernCalifornianArchaeology,Settlementand Exchange Patterns, Specialization and Stratification, Culture Change, Native American Culture, CulturalDiversity.

Cultural ResourcesManagement Reports
Author and co-author of, contributor to, andprincipal investigator for numerous cultural resources management study reports since 1986.

Memberships
* Register of Professional Archaeologists.

Society for AmericanArchaeology.

Society for California Archaeology.

PacificCoastArchaeologicalSociety.

CoachellaValley ArchaeologicalSociety.
16 1094
Education

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER
Deirdre Encarnacion, M.A.
2003 M.A., Anthropology, San Diego State University, California. 2000 B.A., Anthropology, minor in Biology, with honors; San Diego State University, California.
1993 A.A., Communications, Nassau Community College, Garden City, N.Y. 2001 Archaeological Field School, San Diego State University. 2000 Archaeological Field School, San Diego State University.

Professional Experience
2004- Project Archaeologist/Report Writer, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California.
2001-2003 Part-time Lecturer, San Diego State University, California. 2001 Research Assistant for Dr. Lynn Gamble, San Diego State University. 2001 Archaeological Collection Catalog, SDSUFoundation.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Nina Gallardo, B.A.

Education
2004 B.A., Anthropology/Law and Society,University of California, Riverside.

Professional Experience
2004- Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California.

Honors and Awards
2000-2002 Dean's Honors List, University of California, Riverside. 17 Education
2003
2000
1993
2001
2000

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER
Deirdre Encarnacion,MLA.

M.A., Anthropology,SanDiego StateUniversity, California.

B.A., Anthropology, minor in Biology, withhonors;SanDiego State University, California.

A.A. Communications, Nassau Community College, GardenCity, N.Y.

ArchaeologicalFieldSchool, SanDiego StateUniversity.

Archaeological Field School, SanDiego StateUniversity.

ProfessionalExperience
2004-
2001-2003
2001
2001
Education
2004
ProjectArchaeologist/ReportWriter, CRMTECH,Riverside/Colton, California.

Part-time Lecturer, SanDiego StateUniversity, California.

ResearchAssistant for Dr. LynnGamble, SanDiego StateUniversity.

ArchaeologicalCollectionCatalog,SDSUFoundation.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Nina Gallardo,B.A.

B.A., Anthropology /Law andSociety,University of California, Riverside.

ProfessionalExperience
2004- ProjectArchaeologist,CRMTECH,Riverside/Colton,California.

Honors and Awards
2000-2002 Dean's Honors List, University of California,Riverside. 17 1095
Education

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/FIELD DIRECTOR
Daniel Ballester, B.A.
1998 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino. 1997 Archaeological Field School, University of Las Vegas and University of California, Riverside.
1994 University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 2007 Certificate in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), California State University, San Bernardino.
2002 "Historic Archaeology Workshop," presented by Richard Norwood, Base Archaeologist, Edwards Air Force Base;presented at CRM TECH, Riverside, California.

Professional Experience
2002- Field Director, CRM TECH, Riverside/ Colton, California. 1999-2002 Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1998-1999 Field Crew, K.E.A. Environmental, San Diego, California. 1998 Field Crew, A.S.M. Affiliates, Encinitas, California. 1998 Field Crew, Archaeological Research Unit, University of California, Riverside.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Robert Allen Porter, B.A.

Education
2000 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino. 2010 Graduate Student, Anthropology and Education, California State University, San Bernardino.

Professional Experience
2001- Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. • Trained in survey, excavation, historical analysis and construction monitoring; experienced in field recording and reporting on cultural resources.
2000 Archaeological field class under the direction of Claude Warren. Excavated units at Soda Lake in the Mojave Desert and produced lake bottom stratigraphic profiles and carbon sample collections.

Honors and Awards
Spring 2000 Dean's Honors List (G.P.A. of 4.0 in 15 units).

Fall 2000 Dean's Honors List (G.P.A. of 3.9 in 12 units). 18 Education
1998
1997
1994
2007
2002

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/FIELD DIRECTOR
Daniel Ballester,B.A.

B.A.,Anthropology,CaliforniaStateUniversity, SanBernardino.

ArchaeologicalFieldSchool,University of LasVegasandUniversity of California, Riverside.

University of Puerto Rico, RioPiedras,Puerto Rico.

CertificateinGeographicInformationSystems(GIS),CaliforniaState University, SanBernardino.
"Historic ArchaeologyWorkshop,"presentedby RichardNorwood,Base Archaeologist,Edwards Air ForceBase;presented at CRM TECH, Riverside, California.

ProfessionalExperience
2002-
1999-2002
1998-1999
1998
1998
Education
2000
2010
FieldDirector, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California.

ProjectArchaeologist,CRMTECH,Riverside,California.

Field Crew,K.E.A.Environmental, SanDiego, California.

Field Crew, A.S.M. Affiliates, Encinitas, California.

Field Crew,ArchaeologicalResearchUnit,University of California,Riverside.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Robert Allen Porter,B.A.

B.A., Anthropology, California StateUniversity, SanBernardino.

Graduate Student, Anthropology andEducation, California StateUniversity, SanBernardino.

ProfessionalExperience
2001-
2000
Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. * Trainedin survey, excavation, historical analysis and construction monitoring; experiencedin field recording and reporting on cultural resources.

Archaeological field classunder the directionof Claude Warren. Excavated units at SodaLakein theMojaveDesertandproducedlakebottom stratigraphic profiles andcarbon sample collections.

Honors and Awards
Spring2000 Dean'sHonorsList (G.P.A.of 4.0in15units).

Fall 2000 Dean's Honors List (G.P.A. of 3.9 in 12 units). 18 1096
APPENDIX 2

CORRESPONDENCE WITH
NATIVE AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVES*
*A total of 19 local Native American representatives were contacted; a sample letter is included in this report. 19 APPENDIX 2

CORRESPONDENCEWITH
NATIVE AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVES’
*A totalof19localNative Americanrepresentativeswerecontacted;asampleletterisincludedin thisreport. 19 1097
From: Nina <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 201112:02:31 -0800
To: Dave Singleton <ds [email protected]>
Cc: Laura Shaker <[email protected]>
Subject: 2564 MoVal Master Drain NAHC Request
Hi, Dave,
Here is a NAHC request form and map for 2564 MoVal Master Drain. Let me know if there are any problems.

Name of project:

Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan
CRM TECH #2564
Project size:
60 acres and 30 linear miles
Location:

City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County
USGS 7.5' quad sheet data:

Sunnymead, Calif.

Sections: Various, T2-3S R2-3W, SBBM
Please call if you need more information or have any questions. Results may be faxed to the number below. I appreciate your assistance in this matter.

Map included
Thanks,
Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Phone: (909) 824-6400
Fax: (909) 824-6405
From:Nina <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 201112:02:31 -0800
To:DaveSingleton<ds [email protected]>
Cc: Laura Shaker <[email protected]>
Subject: 2564MoVal Master DrainNAHC Request
Hi, Dave,
Hereis aNAHC requestform andmap for 2564MoValMasterDrain. Let meknow if thereareanyproblems.

Name of project:

Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan
CRMTECH #2564
Project size:
60 acres and 30 linear miles
Location:

City of Moreno Valley,RiversideCounty
USGS 7.5"quad sheet data:

Sunnymead, Calif.

Sections: Various, T2-35 R2-3W,SBBM
Pleasecallif you need more information or have any questions. Resultsmay be faxed to the number below. I appreciate your assistancein thismatter.

Mapinduded
Thanks,
Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
1016E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Phone: (909)824-6400
Fax: (909) 824-6405
1098
10/11/2Oil 10:09 FAX 916 657 5390 NAHC ®005/008
STATE; Ot;CALIFORNIfi_ , _ Edmund rj^BmaaJLjSayacaflr

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
91S CAPITOL MALL, BOOM 364
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
(916)653-6251
Fax (Si 6) 657-5390
Web Sits www.nahc.cg.gov
[email protected]
October 10, 2011
Ms. Nina Gallardo, RPA

CRM TECH
1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Sent by FAX to: 909-824-6405
No. of Pages: 4
Re: Sacred Lands File Search and Native American Contacts list for the "Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan (#2564)," located on 60 acres and for 30 linear miles in the vicinity of the City of Lake Elsinore; Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Gallardo:

The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) conducted a Sacred Lands Filesearch of the 'area of potential effect,' (APE) based on the USGS coordinates provided and Native American cultural resources were not identified in the project areas you specified. Also, please note; the NAHC Sacred Lands Inventory is not exhaustive and does not preclude the discovery ofcultural resources during ground braking activity. In the 1985 Appellate Court decision (170 CalApp 3rd 604), the courtheld that the NAHC has jurisdiction and special expertise, as a state agency, over affected Native American resources, impacted by proposed projectsincluding archaeological, places ofreligious significance to Native Americans and burial sites
The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA- CA Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21177, amendments effective 3/18/2010) requires that any project that causes a substantial adverse change inthe significance of an historical resource, that includes archaeological resources, is a 'significant effect' requiring the preparation ofan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) per the CEQA Guidelines defines a significant impact on the environment as 'a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of physical conditions within an area affected by the proposed project, including ...objects of historic or aesthetic significance." Inorder to comply with this provision, the lead agency is required to assess whether the project will have an adverse impact on these resources within the 'area of potential effect (APE), and ifso, to mitigate that effect. CA Government Code §65040.12(e) defines "environmental justice" provisions and is applicable to the environmental review processes.

Early consultation, even during Initial Study or First Phase surveys with NativeAmerican tribes in your area is the best way to avoid unanticipateddiscoveries once a project is underway. Local Native Americans.may have knowledge ofthe religious and cultural significance of the historic properties of the proposed project for the area (e.g. APE).

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
915CAPITOLMALL,ROOM364
SACRAMENTO,CA95814
(916).653-6251
Fax (416)657-5350
Web)Sitewww.nahe.ci gov [email protected]
October10,2011
Ms. Nina Gallardo, RFA

CRM TECH
1016E. CooleyDrive,SuiteA/B
Colton,CA92324
Sentby FAX to: 900-824-6405
No.of Pages: 4
Re: SacredLandsFileSearchand NativeAmericanContacts list forthe “Moreno Valley MasterDrainagePlan (#2564),”locatedon 60 acresandfor 30linear milesin thevicinityof the City of LakeElsinore;RiversideCounty,California * Dear Ms.Gallardo:

TheNativeAmericanHeritageCommission(NAHC) conducteda SacredLandsFile searchof the "areaof potentialeffect,’(APE)basedonthe USGScoordinatesprovidedandNative American cultural resources werenot identified in theproject areas youspecified. Also, pleasenote; theNAHCSacredLandsInventory is not exhaustiveanddoesnot precludethe discovery of culturalresourcesduringgroundbrakingactivity. In the1985AppellateCourt decision(170CalApp3rd604),the courtheldthattheNAHChas jurisdiction andspecial expertise,as a stateagency,over affectedNativeAmericanresources,impactedbyproposed projectsincludingarchaeological,placesofreligious significanceto NativeAmericansandburial sites
TheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA—CAPublicResourcesCode§§ 21000-21177,amendmentseffective3/18/2010)requiresthat anyprojectthat causesa substantialadversechangein the significanceof anhistoricalresource,thatincludes archaeologicalresources,is a ‘significanteffect’requiringthepreparation of anEnvironmental impactReport(EIR)perthe CEQAGuidelinesdefinesa significantimpactonthe environment as ‘a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in anyof physical conditions within an area affectedby the proposedproject, including...objects of historic or aesthetic significance.” In order to comply with this provision, the lead agency is required to assess whether the project will have an adverse impact on these resources within the ‘area of potential effect (APE), and if so, to mitigate that effect. CA GovernmentCode §65040.12(e) defines “environmental justice” provisions and is applicable to the environmental review processes.

Early consultation, evenduring InitialStudy or FirstPhasesurveyswithNativeAmerican tribesin your areais thebestwayto avoidunanticipateddiscoveriesoncea projectis underway.LocalNativeAmericansmay haveknowledgeof the religiousandcultural significance of the historic properties of the proposed project for the area (e.g.APE).

Consultation with Native American communities is also a matter of environmental justice as definedby CaliforniaGovernmentCode§65040.12(e).Weurgeconsultationwiththosetribes andinterestedNativeAmericans onthelist theNAHChas attachedin orderto seeif your proposed project might impact Native American cultural resources. We attach another list so that you can compare in case our list updates the one provided to Cal FIRE. Lead agencies 1099
10/11/2011 10:09 FAX 916 657 5390 NAHC @006/008
should consider avoidance as defined in §15370 ofthe CEQA Guidelines when significant cultural resources as defined by the CEQA Guidelines §15064.5 (b)(c)(f) may be affected by a proposed project. If so, Section 15382 oftheCEQA Guidelines defines a significant impact on the environment as "substantial," and Section 2183.2 which requires documentation, data recovery of cultural resources. The 1992 Secretary ofthe Interiors Standards for the Treatment ofHistoric Properties were revised so thatthey could be applied to all historic resource types included in the National Register ofHistoric Places and including cultural landscapes. Also, federal Executive Orders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment), 13175 (coordination &consultation) and 13007 (Sacred Sites) are helpful, supportive guides for Section 106 consultation. The aforementioned Secretary ofthe Interior's Standards include recommendations for all lead agencies' to considerthe historic context of proposed projects and to "research" the cultural landscapethat might include the 'area of potential effect.' Partnering with local tribes and interested Native American consulting parties, onthe NAHC list, should be conducted in compliance with the requirements offederal NEPA (42 U.S.C 4321-43351) and Section 106 4(f), Section 110 (f)(k) offederal NHPA (16 U.S.C. 470 etseq), 36CFR Part 800.3 (f) (2) &.5, the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CSQ, 42 U.S.C 4371 efseq. and NAGPRA (25 U.S.C. 3001-3013) as appropriate. The 1992 Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment ofHistoric Properties were revised so thatthey could be applied to all historic resource types included in the National Register ofHistoric Places and including cultural landscapes. Also, federal Executive Orders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment), 13175 (coordination &consultation) and 13007 (Sacred Sites) are helpful, supportive guides for Section 106 consultation.

Also, California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, California Government Code §27491 and Health &SafetyCode Section 7050.5 provide for provisions foraccidentally discovered archeological resources during construction and mandate the processes to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery of any human remainsin a project location other than a 'dedicated cemetery', another important reason to have Native American Monitors on board with the project.

To be effective, consultation on specific projects must be the result of an ongoing relationship between Native American tribes and lead agencies,, project proponentsand their contractors, in the opinion of the NAHC. An excellent way to reinforce the relationship between a project and local tribes is to employ Native American Monitors in all phases of proposed projects including the planning phases.

Confidentiality of "historic properties of religious and cultural significance" may also be protected under Section 304 of he NHPA or at the Secretary of the Interior discretion if not eligiblefor listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Secretary may also be advised by the federal Indian Religious Freedom Act(cf. 42 U.S.C, 1996) in issuing a decision on whether or not to disclose items of religious and/or cultural significance identified in or near the APE and possibility threatened by proposed project activity.

Ifyou have any questions about this response to your request, please do not hesitate to contacTrr^ at (916) 653-6251.

Attachment: /Native American Contact List
PS: Please include your firm's Facsimile Number on your requests. Thank you.

7. 10/11/2011 10:08 FAX 916 657 5380 NAHC
should consideravoidance as defined in §15370 of the CEQA Guidelines when significant culturalresourcesasdefinedby the CEQAGuidelines§15064.5(b)(c)(f) maybe affectedby a proposed project. If so, Section15382 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a significantimpact on the environment as “substantial.” and Section 2183.2 which requires documentation,data recovery of culturalresources.The1992 Secretaryof theInteriorsStandards forthe Treatment ofHistoricPropertieswererevisedsothatthey couldbe appliedto all historic resourcetypes includedin theNationalRegisterof HistoricPlacesandincludingcultural landscapes. Also, federalExecutive Orders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment),13175 (coordination& consultation) and13007(SacredSites)arehelpful, supportiveguides for Section106 consultation. TheaforementionedSecretaryof theInterior'sStandards include recommendations for all lead agencies’to considerthehistoric contextof proposedprojects andto “research”the culturallandscapethat mightincludethe ‘areaof potentialeffect.’ Partnering with localtribes and interested NativeAmerican consulting parties, on the NAHClist, shouldbe conductedin compliancewiththerequirementsof federalNEPA(42 U.S.C 4321-43351) andSection1064(f),Section110(f)(k)of federalNHPA(16U.S.C.470 et seq), 36 CFR Part 800.3 (f) (2) & .5, the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CSQ, 42 U.8.C 4371et seq.andNAGPRA(25U.S.C. 3001-3013) as appropriate.The1992Secrstaryof theInteriorsStandardsforthe Treatmentof HistoricPropertieswererevisedsothatthey could be appliedto all historic resourcetypes includedin the NationalRegisterof HistoricPlacesand including cultural landscapes. Also, federal ExecutiveOrders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment), 13175 (coordination& consultation) and 13007 (Sacred Sites) are helpful, supportive guides for Section 106 consultation.

Also,CaliforniaPublic ResourcesCodeSection5097.98,CaliforniaGovernmentCode §27491and Health& SafetyCodeSection7050.5providefor provisionsfor accidentally discoveredarcheologicalresourcesduringconstructionand mandatetheprocessesto be followedin theevent of an accidentaldiscovery of any humanremainsin a projectlocationother thana ‘dedicatedcemetery’, anotherimportantreasonto haveNativeAmericanMonitorson boardwiththe project.

To be effective, consultationonspecificprojectsmustbetheresult of an ongoing relationshipbetweenNativeAmericantribesandlead agencies,project proponentsandtheir contractors,in the opinionofthe NAHC.Anexcellent way to reinforcetherelationshipbetween a projectandlocaltribesis to employ NativeAmericanMonitorsin all phasesofproposed projects including the planning phases.

Confidentialityof “historicpropertiesof religiousandculturalsignificance”may alsobe protectedunderSection304of he NHPAorat theSecretary of theInterior discretionif not eligibleforlistingonthe NationalRegisterof HistoricPlaces.TheSecretary may alsobe advisedby the federalIndianReligiousFreedomAct(cf.42U.S.C,,1986)in issuinga decision on whether or not to disclose items of religious and/or cultural significanceidentified in or near theAPEandpossibility threatenedby proposedprojectactivity.

If you have any questions about this responseto your request, please do not hesitate to _Bave Singletd
Attachment: ive AmericanContactList
PS: Pleaseinclude yourfirm’sFacsimileNumberon yourrequests. Thank you. 008/008
1100
10/11/2011 10:09 FAX 916 657 5390 NAHC
Native American Contacts
Riverside County
October 10, 2011
1007/00?
Los Coyotes Band of Mission Indians
Shane Chapparosa, Spokesperson
P.O. Box 189 Cahuilla
Warner , CA 92086
loscoyotes@earthlink. net
(760) 782-0711
(760) 782-2701 - FAX
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Tribal Historic Preservation Office/Shasta Gaugher
35008 PalaTernecuia Road, PMB Luiseno
Pala . CA 92059 Cupeno
[email protected]
(760)891-3515
(760) 742-3189 Fax
Pauma & Yuima Reservation
Randall Majel, Chairperson
P.O. Box369 Luiseno
Pauma Valley CA 92061
paumareservation@aol-com
(760)742-1289
(760) 742-3422 Fax
Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resource Center
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula > CA 92593
(951)770-8100
pmacarro@pechanga-nsn.
gov
(951)506-9491 Fax
Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians
Joseph Hamilton, Chairman
P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza , CA 92539
[email protected]
(951)763-4105
(951) 763-4325 Fax
Rincon Band of Mission Indians
Tiffany Wolfe, Cultural & Environmental
P.O. Box 68 Luiseno
Valley Center. CA 92082
[email protected]
(760) 297-2632
(760) 297-2639 Fax
Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
John Marcus, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 391820 Cahuilla
Anza . CA 92539
sestrada®
(951)659-2700
(951) 659-2228 Fax
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Michael Contreras, Cultural Heritage Prog.
12700 Pumarra Road Cahuilla
Banning , CA 92220 Serrano
(951) 201-1866-cell
mcontreras@ morongo-nsn.
gov
(951) 922-0105 Fax
This list is current only as of the date of this document Distribution ofthislistdoesnotrelieve any person ofthestatutory responsibility as defined inSection 7050.5 oftheHealth andSafety Cods, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5D97.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resourcesfor the proposed Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan Project; locate on 60-acres andalong 30linear miles intheCity ofMoreno Valley area; Riverside County, California for whicha Sacred LandsFilesearch and Native American Contactslistwererequested. 10/11/2011 10:09 FAX 916 857 5380 NAHC 007/008
Natlve American Contacis
RiversideCounty
October 10, 2011
Los Coyotes Band of Mission Indians
ShaneChapparosa,Spokesperson
P.O. Box 189 Cahuilla
Warner » CA 92086
loscoyotes @earthlink.net
(760) 782-0711
(760) 782-2701 - FAX
Pala Band of Mission Indians
TribalHistoricPreservationOffice/ShastaGaugher
35008PalaTemeculaRoad,PMB uiseno
Pala » CA 92059 Cupeno
[email protected]
(760) 891-3515
(760) 742-3189 Fax
Pauma & Yuima Reservation
Randall Majel, Chairperson
P.O. Box 369
PaumaValley CA 92061
[email protected]
(760) 742-1289
(760) 742-3422Fax
Luiseno
PechangaBandof MissionIndians PaulMacarro,CulturalResourceCenter P.O.Box1477
Temecula . CA 92593
(951) 770-8100
pmacarro@pechanga-nsn.
gov
(951) 506-9491 Fax
Luiseno
This list is current only as of the date of this document.

RamonaBandof CahuillaMissionIndians
Joseph Hamilton, Chairman
P.O. Box 391670
Anza » CA 92539
[email protected]
(051) 763-4105
(951) 763-4325Fax
Cahuilla
RinconBand of MissionIndians
TiffanyWolfe,Cultural& Environmental
P.O. Box 68 Luiseno
Valley Center. CA 92082
twolfe @rincontribe.org
(760)297-2632
(760) 297-2639Fax
Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
John Marcus, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 391820
Anza + CA 92539
sestrada@
(951)659-2700
(951)659-2228Fax
Cahuilla
MorongoBand of Mission Indians
Michael Contreras, Cultural Heritage Prog.
12700PumarraRoad Cahuilla
Banning » CA 92220 Serrano
(951) 201-1866 - cell
mcontreras@morongo-nsn.
gov
(851) 922-0105Fax
Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of the statutory responsibility as definedin Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section5097.94of thePublicResourcesCodeandSection5097.58ofthePublicResourcesCode.

Thislist Is applicablefor contactinglocalNativeAmericanswithregardto culturalresourcesfor theproposed MoronoValley MasterDrainagePlanProject;locateon60-acresandalong30linesr milesin theClty ofMorenoValleyarea;RiversideCounty, Calfforniafor whichaSacredLandsFliesearchandNative AmericanContactslist ware requested, 1101
10/11/2011 10:10 FAX 918 657 5390 NAHC 1008/008
Native American Contacts
Riverside County
October 10,2011
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Ann Brierty, Policy/Cultural Resources Departmen
26569 Community Center. Drive Serrano
Highland . CA 92346
(909) 864-8933, Ext 3250
abrierty@sanmanuel-nsn.
gov
(909) 862-5152 Fax
Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula - CA 92593
[email protected]
(951)770-6100
(951)695-1778 Fax
Willie J. Pink
48310 Pechanga Road
Temecula , CA 92592
wjpink® hotmail.com
(909)936-1216
Prefers e-mail contact
Serrano Nation of Indians
Goldie Walker
P.O. Box 343
Patton . CA 92369
(909) 862-9883
Luiseno
Serrano
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Luther Salgado, Sr.,, Chairperson
PO Box 391760 Cahuilla
Anza . CA 92539
[email protected]
915-763-5549
Pechanga Cultural Resources Department
Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst
P.O. Box 2183 Luisefio
Temecula . CA 92593
[email protected]
951-770-8100
(951) 694-0446-FAX
Ernest H. Siva
Morongo Band of Mission Indians Tribal Elder
9570 Mias Canyon Road Serrano
Banning . CA 92220 Cahuilla
[email protected]
(951)849-4676

SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487 Luiseno
San Jacinto . CA 92581
[email protected]
(951)663-5279
(951) 654-5544, ext 4137
This list is current only as of the date of this document Distribution ofthislistdoesnotrelieve anyperson ofthe statutory responsibility as defined inSection 7050.5 oftheHealth andSafety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

Thislist is applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regardto cultural resourcesforthe proposed Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan Project; locate on60-acres andalong 30linear miles in theCity ofMoreno Valley area; Riverside County, California for Whicha Sacred Lands Filesearch and Native American Contacts list were requested. 10/11/2011 10:10 FAX 918 657 5390 NAHC Rons/008
Native American Contacts
Riverside County
October 10, 2011
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Ann Brierly, Policy/CulturalResources Departmen
26569 Community Center. Drive
Highland , CA92346
(909) 864-8933,Ext 3250
abrierty @sanmanuel-nsn.
gov
(909) 862-5152 Fax
Serrano
Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula » CA 92593
[email protected]
(951) 770-6100
(951) 695-1778 Fax
Luiseno
Willie J. Pink
48310 Pechanga Road
Temecula : CA 92592
[email protected]
(909) 936-1216
Prefers e-mail contact
Luiseno
Serrano Nation of indians
Goldie Walker
P.O. Box 343
Patton
Serrano
s CA 92369
(909) 862-9883
CahuillaBandof Indians
LutherSalgado,Sr.,, Chairperson
PO Box 391760 Cahuilla
Anza » CA 92539
[email protected]
915-763-5549
Pechanga Cultural Resources Department
Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst
P.O. Box 2183 Luisefio
Temecula CA 92593
[email protected]
951-770-8100
(951) 694-0446 - FAX
Ernest H. Siva
MorongoBand of Mission Indians Tribal Elder
9570MiasCanyonRoad Serrano
Banning , CA 92220 Cahuilla
[email protected]
(951)849-4676

SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487 Luiseno
San Jacinto . CA 92581
jontiveros @soboba-nsn.gov
(951) 663-5279
(951) 654-5544,ext 4137
This listis current only as of the dateof this document.

Distribution ofthis ist doesnotrelieveanypersonof thestatutory responsibility asdefinedin Section 7050.5of theHealthandSafetyCode, Saction5057.94of thePublicResourcesCodeandSection5097.98of thePublicResourcesCode, Thislist is applicablefor contactinglocalNativeAmericanswithregardto culturalresources for theproposed MorenoValleyMasterDrainagePlanProject;locateon 80-acresandalong30linearmilesintheCityof MorenoValleyarea;RiversideCounty, Californiafor whichaSacredLandsFliesearchandNativeAmericanContactslist wererequested. 1102
1*

CRM TECH
1016 L. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
November 1, 2011
Michael Contreras, Cultural Heritage Program Coordinator Morongo Band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA 92220
RE: Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan
In the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County
CRM TECH Contract #2564
Dear Mr. Contreras:

As part of a cultural resources study for the project referenced above, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American cultural resources in or near the project area. In a letter dated October 10, 2011, the Native American Heritage Commission reports that the sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources within the project area, but recommends that local Native American groups be contacted for further information. Please respond at your earliest convenience if you have any specific knowledge of sacred/religious sites or other sites of Native American traditional cultural value within or near the project area.

The proposed Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan project involves approximately 60 acres of land for proposed basins and 30 linear miles of proposed storm drain and open channels, located throughout the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County. The accompanying map, based on the USGS Sunnymead, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle, depicts the location of the project area in various sections throughout T2S and T3S, R2W and R3W, SBBM. The lead agency for this project is the City of Moreno Valley for CEQA- compliance purposes.

Any information, concerns or recommendations regarding cultural resources in the vicinity of the project area may be forwarded to CRM TECH by telephone, e-mail, facsimile or standard mail. Requests for documentation or information we cannot provide will be forwarded to our client and/or the lead agency. We would also like to clarify that CRM TECH, as the cultural resources consultant for the project, is not the appropriate entity to initiate government-to-government consultations. Thank you for the time and effort in addressing this important matter.

Respectfully,
Laura Hensley Shaker

CRM TECH
End.: Project area map

CRM TECH
1016E. CooleyDrive, SuiteA/B
Colton, CA 92324
November 1, 2011
Michael Contreras, CulturalHeritage Program Coordinator MorongoBand of MissionIndians
12700Pumarra Road
Banning,CA 92220
RE: MorenoValleyMasterDrainagePlan
In theCity of MorenoValley,RiversideCounty
CRM TECH Contract #2564
Dear Mr. Contreras:

As part of a culturalresources study for the project referenced above,I am writing to request your input onpotentialNative American culturalresourcesin or near the project area. In aletter dated October 10,2011,the Native AmericanHeritage Commissionreports that thesacredlandsrecordsearchidentifiedno Native Americanculturalresourceswithin the projectarea,butrecommends that local Native American groups be contacted for furtherinformation. Pleaserespond at your earliest convenienceif you have any specific knowledge of sacred/ religious sitesor other sitesof Native American traditional cultural valuewithinor neartheprojectarea.

The proposed Moreno Valley Master DrainagePlanproject involves approximately 60 acresof land for proposedbasins and 30linear miles of proposed storm drain and open channels,locatedthroughouttheCity ofMorenoValley,RiversideCounty. The accompanying map,based on the USGSSunnymead, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle, depicts the locationof theprojectareainvarioussectionsthroughoutT2SandT3S,R2WandR3W, SBBM.Thelead agency for this projectis theCity of Moreno Valley for CEQA- compliance purposes.

Any information, concernsor recommendations regarding culturalresourcesin the vicinity of theprojectareamaybe forwardedto CRMTECHby telephone,e-mail,facsimileor standard mail. Requests for documentation or information we cannot provide will be forwarded to our client and/or the lead agency. We would alsolike to clarify that CRM TECH],as the culturalresourcesconsultant for the project,is not the appropriate entity to initiate government-to-government consultations. Thank you for the time and effort in addressingthisimportant matter.

Respectfully,
LauraHensleyShaker

CRM TECH
Encl.:Project areamap
1103
November 7, 2011
Laura Hensley Shaker
CRM Tech
1016E. Cooley Dr., Suite A/B
Colton, Ca 92324
PALA TRIBAL HISTORIC q^^J]
PRESERVATION OFFICE £ ^ ^
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Road
Pala, CA 92059
760-891-3510 Office | 760-742-3189 Fax PALATHPO
Re: CRM Tech Contract #2564
Dear Ms. Shaker,
The Pala Band of Mission Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Officehas received your notification of the project referenced above. This letter constitutes our response on behalf ofRobert Smith, Tribal Chairman.

We have consulted our maps and determined that the project as described is not within the boundaries of the recognized Pala Indian Reservation. The project is also beyond the boundaries ofthe territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Use Area (TUA).

Therefore, we have no objection to the continuation of projectactivities as currently planned and we defer to the wishes of Tribes in closerproximity to the project area.

We appreciate involvement with your initiative and look forward to working with you on future efforts. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 760-891-3515 or by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Shasta C. Gaughen, PhD
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Pala Band ofMission Indians
ATTENTION: THE PALA TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUESTS FOR CONSULTATION. PLEASE ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE TO SHASTA C. GAUGHEN AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO ALSO SEND NOTICES TO PALA TRIBAL CHAIRMAN ROBERT SMITH.

RECEIVED NOV 09 2011
Consultation letter 1

PALA TRIBAL HISTORIC

PRESERVATION OFFICE
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Road
Pala, CA 92059 Go 760-891-3510Office | 760-742-3189 Fax PALATHPO November 7, 2011
LauraHensley Shaker
CRM Tech
1016E. CooleyDr., SuiteA/B
Colton, Ca 92324
Re: CRM Tech Contract #2564
Dear Ms. Shaker,
ThePalaBandofMissionIndiansTribalHistoricPreservationOfficehasreceivedyour ‘notificationof theprojectreferencedabove.Thisletter constitutesourresponseonbehalf ofRobert Smith, Tribal Chairman.

Wehave consultedour maps anddeterminedthattheproject asdescribedis not within theboundariesof the recognizedPalaIndianReservation. Theproject is alsobeyond the boundariesof the territory that the tribe considers its Traditional Use Area (TUA).

Therefore,we haveno objection to the continuation ofproject activities as currently plannedandwedeferto thewishesof Tribesin closerproximity to theprojectarea.

We appreciateinvolvement with your initiative andlook forward to working with you on futureefforts.If youhavequestionsor needadditionalinformation,pleasedonothesitate to contact me by telephone at 760-891-3515 or by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
= RN
ShastaC. Gaughen,PhD
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
PalaBand of MissionIndians
ATTENTION:THEPALA TRIBAL HISTORICPRESERVATIONOFFICEIS RESPONSIBLE FORALLREQUESTSFORCONSULTATION.PLEASEADDRESSCORRESPONDENCE TO SHASTAC. GAUGHEN AT THEABOVE ADDRESS.ITISNOT NECESSARYTO ALSOSENDNOTICESTOPALA TRIBAL CHAIRMAN ROBERT SMITH.

RECEIVED NOV09 201
Consultationletter 1
1104
*P-1H"*»
November 10, 2011
Laura Hensley Shaker

CRM TECH
1016E. Cooley Dr. Ste. A/B
Colton, CA 92324 "^«^^
EST. JUNE 19,1883
Re: Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan, In the City of Moreno Valley CRM TECH Project # 2564
The Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians appreciates your observance of Tribal Cultural Resources and their preservation in your project, as well as the opportunity to participate in the site visit and evaluation process. The information provided to us on said project has been assessed through our Cultural Resource Department, where it was concluded that although it is outside the existing reservation, the project area does fall within the bounds of our Tribal Traditional Use Areas. This project location is in close proximity to known village sites and is a shared use area that was used in ongoing trade between the Luiseno and Cahuilla tribes. Therefore it is regarded as highly sensitive to the people of Soboba.

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians also requests the following:

1. To initiate a consultation with the Project Developer and Land owner.

2. The transfer of information to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians regarding the progress of this project should be done as soon as new developments occur.

3. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians continues to act as a consulting tribal entity for this project.

4. Working in and around traditional use areas intensifies the possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction/excavation phase. For this reason the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians requests that Native American Monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resource Department to be present during any ground disturbing proceedings. Including surveys and archaeological testing.

CRM TECH
1016E.CooleyDr.Ste. A/B
Colton, CA 92324
EST.JUNE19,1883
Re: Moreno Valley Master DrainagePlan,In the City of Moreno Valley CRM TECHProject # 2564
The SobobaBand of Luisefio Indians appreciates your observanceof Tribal Cultural Resourcesandtheirpreservationinyourproject,aswell astheopportunity toparticipate in the site visit and evaluation process. Theinformation provided to us on said project has been assessedthrough our Cultural ResourceDepartment, where it was concluded that althoughit is outsidetheexistingreservation,theprojectareadoes fall within thebounds of our Tribal Traditional Use Areas. Thisproject locationis in closeproximity to known villagesitesandis ashareduseareathat wasusedinongoingtradebetweentheLuiseno andCahuillatribes. Thereforeitis regardedashighly sensitiveto thepeopleof Soboba.

SobobaBandof LuisefioIndians alsorequeststhefollowing:

1. To initiate a consultation with theProject Developer and Land owner.

2. Thetransfer of informationto theSobobaBandofLuisenoIndiansregardingtheprogressof this projectshouldbedoneassoonasnewdevelopmentsoccur.

3. SobobaBand of LuisefioIndians continues to act asa consulting tribal entity for this project.

4. Workingin and around traditional use areasintensifies the possibility of encountering cultural resourcesduring theconstruction/excavationphase. ForthisreasontheSobobaBandof Luisefio Indians requests that Native American Monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of LuisefioIndians Cultural ResourceDepartment tobe present during any ground disturbingproceedings.Including surveys andarchaeologicaltesting.

5. Request that proper proceduresbe takenand requestsof the tribe behonored (Pleasesee the attachment)
Sincerely,
JosephOntiveros
SobobaCultural ResourceDepartment
P.O.Box 487
SanJacinto,CA 92581
Phone (951) 654-5544ext. 4137
Cell (951)663-5279
[email protected]
1105
Cultural Items (Artifacts). Ceremonial items and items of cultural patrimony reflect traditional religious beliefs and practices of the Soboba Band. The Developer should agree to return all Native American ceremonial items and items of cultural patrimony that may be found on the project site to the Soboba Band for appropriate treatment. In addition, the Soboba Band requests the return of all other cultural items (artifacts) that are recovered during the course of archaeological investigations. When appropriate and agreed upon in advance, the Developer's archeologist may conduct analyses of certain artifact classes if required by CEQA, Section 106 of NHPA, the mitigation measures or conditions of approval for the Project. This may include but is not limited or restricted to include shell, bone, ceramic, stone or other artifacts.

The Developer should waive any and all claims to ownership of Native American ceremonial and cultural artifacts that may be found on the Project site. Upon completion of authorized and mandatory archeological analysis, the Developer should return said artifacts to the Soboba Band within a reasonable time period agreed to by the Parties and not to exceed (30) days from the initial recovery of the items.

Treatment and Disposition of Remains.

A. The Soboba Band shall be allowed, under California Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (a), to (1)inspect the site of the discovery and (2)make determinations as to how the human remains and grave goods shall be treated and disposed of with appropriate dignity.

B. The Soboba Band, as MLD, shall complete its inspection within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving notification from either the Developer or the NAHC, as required by California Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (a). The Parties agree to discuss in good faith what constitutes "appropriate dignity" as that term is used in the applicable statutes.

C. Reburial of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with the California Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (a) and (b). The Soboba Band, as the MLD in consultation with the Developer, shall make the final discretionary determination regarding the appropriate disposition and treatment of human remains.

D. All parties are aware that the Soboba Band may wish to rebury the human remains and associated ceremonial and cultural items (artifacts) on or near, the site of their discovery, in an area that shall not be subject to future subsurface disturbances. The Developer should accommodate on-site reburial in a location mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

CulturalItems (Artifacts). Ceremonialitemsanditemsof culturalpatrimony reflect traditionalreligiousbeliefsandpracticesof theSobobaBand. TheDeveloper shouldagree to return all Native American ceremonial items and items of cultural patrimony that may be found on the project site to the SobobaBand for appropriate treatment. In addition, the SobobaBand requests the return of all other cultural items (artifacts) that arerecovered during the course of archaeologicalinvestigations. When appropriate and agreed uponin advance,theDeveloper'sarcheologistmayconductanal sesof certainartifact classesif requiredby CEQA,Section106 of NHPA,themitigation mie asugesor conditionsof approval for theProjed “Thismay includebut iis not limited"Oirestricted toinclude shell, bone, ceramic, sto
TheDevelopes.shouldwaiveanyandallclaimstoovenézshipof Nativ ceremonialaridculturalartifactsthat may be found on theProject site.Uponcompletion of authorize mandatory archeologicalanalysis,theDevelopershouldretuszeSai artifacts to theSobobaBandwithinareasonabletimeperiodagreedtobythe not to ex ged (30)daysfromthe initialrecovery of theitems AN A ThesSobobaBand shallbe allowed,und ode§ 5097.98(a), to (1)inspect the site of the discov eterminations asto how the humanremainsand grave oodssh patedof with appropriate dignity. : or o
B. The SobobaBand, asMLD, shallcompleteits inspection witht {tWenty-four(24)hoursofreceivingnotificationfrom eithertheDeveloper or the VAHC, asrequiredby CaliforniaPublic ResourcesCode § 5097.98(a). TheParties agreeto discussin good faith what constitutes' appropriate ich as that termis usedin theapplicablestatutes.

C. Reburialofhumanremains shallbeaccomplishedin compliancewith the CaliforniaPublic ResourcesCode§ 5097.98(a) and (b). TheSobobaBand, as the MLDin consultationwith theDeveloper,shallmakethe final discretionary determinationregarding the appropriate disposition and treatment of human remains.

D. All parties are aware that the SobobaBand may wish to rebury the humanremains and associated ceremonial and cultural items (artifacts) on or near, the siteof their discovery,in anareathat shallnot be subjectto future subsurface disturbances. TheDeveloper should accommodateon-site reburial in alocation mutually agreed uponby the Parties.

E. Theterm"humanremains"encompassesmore thanhumanbones
because the SobobaBand's traditions periodically necessitatedthe ceremonial burning of humanremains. Gravegoodsarethoseartifacts associatedwith any humanremains. Theseitems,andotherfuneraryremnantsandtheir ashesaretobe treated in the samemanner ashumanbone fragments or bones that remainintact. 1106
Coordination with County Coroner's Office. TheLeadAgencies and the Developer should immediately contact boththeCoroner and theSoboba Band in the event that any human remains are discovered during implementation of the Project. If the Coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, the Coroner shall ensure that notification is provided to the NAHC within twenty-four (24) hours of the determination, as required by California Health and Safety Code § 7050.5 (c).

Non-Disclosure of Location Reburials. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or cultural artifacts shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California PublicRecords Act. The Coroner, parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code § 6254 (r).

Coordination with County Coroner'sOffice. TheLead Agenciesand theDeveloper shouldimmediately contactboth theCoroner and theSobobaBandin theeventthat any human remains are discovered duringimplementation of theProject. If the Coroner recognizes the humanremains to be thoseof aNative American, or has reason to believe that they are those of aNative.American, the Caronershallensure that notificationis provided to the NAHC within tw ity-four (24) hott § of thédetermination, asrequiredby California Health andSafetyCode § 7050.5(¢). 4 Non-Disclosure ofLocationReburials. It isunderstoodby allparties thatunless otherwiserequiredbylaw, thesiteof anyreburial ofNative American humanremainsor culturalartifacts shallnotbe disclosedandshallnotbe governedby public disclosure requirementsof theCaliforniaPublicRecordsAct. TheCoroner,parties, andLead Agencies, will beaskedto withholdpublic disclosureinformationrelatedtosuchreburial, pursuantto thespecificexemptionsetforthinCaliforniaGovernmentCode§6254(r). Ceremonialitemsanditemsof culturalpatrimony reflecttraditionalreligiousbeliefs and practicesof theSobobaBand. TheDeveloper agrees to return allNative American cefemonialitems anditemsof culturalpatrimony thatmaybe found on theprojet Hy to the®SobobaBandfor appropriatetreatment. In addition, theSobobaBandrequest§#h returnof all other cultural items (artifacts)that arerecoveredduring the course archaeologicalinvestigations. Whereappropriateandagreeduponin advance, oper’s archeologist may conduct analysesof certainartifact classesif requi Section106of NHPA, themitigationmeasuresor conditions of approval Thismayincludebutisnot limited or restricted toinclude shell, bone, 1107
Figure 2. Project area. (Based on USGS Sunnymead, Calif., 1:24,000 quadrangle [USGS 1980]) 0 . T K E R oj
4 I
TAG
18 57 |
SEAT
<8,
za
ELL CERT»
i Ly CECLL ol N— = ap]
: ro wn LL Lo
+ b i RK 4
hy » 1 See Lk q . :
fe Azz le set sxc =y
ls
3 DADiLA
3)S
)
An
ea N : 7 FE¢
or
od 8H WN >
fee Ty
Figure2. Projectarea. (BasedonUSGSSunnymead,Calif.,1:24,000quadrangle[USGS1980]) 1108
•
Project area
Areas previously
surveyed
4,000 Ft
3 Figure 4a. Previous cultural resources studies in the vicinity of the project area (western portion), listed by EIC file number. Locations of known historical/archaeological sites are not shown as a protective measure. 8 QBN] P(E Ut
i 5 RI y NEAN
J PIT
3 SA Bp hs _ Ea) LIN ANY ,
- Ving 2 sa rn 1d
AST he Se :
« AVE ii ded
pos — ia -— k N
A N Favs Le re —~ pd ] 1Scop SEE OF
records
search
1Fault G ST RET NINE CA gy anemia
BP AVES A Rl PRC A 4 4 4 Lm 8 ra ~ AS / i NS b
H AL. <y pe “3 nt 3 ) x . J» CARAVAS 2 “
\ { 4 J Ax 5 ia n / 632 7 & ] | - »
Z|
) |
"er, Cra | eh “ ) FT .

Te eer AY “ : - } 3 FIRES ALBP FREE ERT wR, ; or " SN ) #131 - 8241, ° 473 J : “ag A pant A NC het 0 er Sy \ f he
~~ 3 N [] . Ny a ~~ LA Cdn 8
LN vd J ane : | 2178,6753
§ H orrose. a
SN. Fatt ANNNN hit
mmm Af 502.
= dh Fe anew [Pk FET
H ¥ v ZoGRANT
i [] Ln . . [3 = ! +7 x
1 I EE
Il ! an pod
Te

FYI TIL LT
Project area
Areaspreviously
surveyed
A—RS
+
SCALE1:28,000
Figure 4a. Previous cultural resources studies in the vicinity of the project area(westernportion), listedby EIC file number. Locations of known historical/archaeologicalsitesarenot shownasaprotectivemeasure. 1109
Figure 4b. Previous cultural resources studies in the vicinity of the project area (eastern portion).

Project area
Areas previously
surveyed
SCALE 1:28,000
4,000 Ft
3 ART at SATE LE DV Et SE 3 Ny ad :
> IR RL WL
73%
[| re A aT —.
{
|1
i
wdJ<4
/
VALLEY
fen SD PE SERN
Project area Areas previously
surveyed
x j
Figure 4b. Previous culturalresources studies in the vicinity of the project area(easternportion).

SCALE1:28,000
0 4,000Ft
BH — —
1110

PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Tentative Tract Map No. 36740
City of Moreno Valley
Riverside County, California
For Submittal to:

City ofMoreno Valley
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Prepared for:

Charles and Dan Moothart
MultiVac, Inc.

P.O. Box 1627
Laguna Beach, CA 92652
Prepared by:

CRM TECH
1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator
Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator
April 18,2014
CRM TECH Contract No. 2796
——
RI-9083
PHASE1ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAPNO.36740
City of Moreno Valley
Riverside County, California
For Submittal to:

City ofMorenoValley
PlanningDivision
| 14177Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Prepared for:

CharlesandDanMoothart
| MultiVac, Inc.

P.O. Box 1627
LagunaBeach, CA 92652
Prepared by:

CRM TECH
1016East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Bai "Tom" Tang,Principal Investigator
Michael Hogan,Principal Investigator
April 18,2014
CRM TECH ContractNo. 2796
1111
Title:

Author(s):

Consulting Firm:

Date:

For Submittal to:

Prepared for:

USGS Quadrangle:

Project Size:

Keywords:

Phase I Archaeological Assessment: Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, City ofMoreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator/Historian
Mariam Dahdul, Archaeologist/Report Writer
Daniel Ballester, Archaeologist
Nina Gallardo, Archaeologist

CRM TECH
1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
Colton, CA 92324
(909) 824-6400
April 18,2014
City of Moreno Valley
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
(951)413-3206
Charles and Dan Moothart
MultiVac, Inc.

P.O. Box 1627
Laguna Beach, CA 92652
(619)966-9589
Sunnymead, Calif, 7.5' quadrangle (Section 14, T3S R3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian)
Approximately 14 acres
Moreno Valley area, Riverside County; Phase I historical/archaeological resources survey; Assessor's Parcel Nos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006; no "historical resources" affected Title: PhaseI ArchaeologicalAssessment:TentativeTractMapNo. 36740,City ofMoreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Author(s): Bai "Tom" Tang,Principal Investigator/Historian MariamDahdul,Archaeologist/ReportWriter
Daniel Ballester, Archaeologist
NinaGallardo,Archaeologist
ConsultingFirm: CRM TECH
1016East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
| Colton, CA 92324
| (909) 824-6400
| Date: April 18,2014
For Submittal to: City ofMorenoValley
PlanningDivision
14177Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
(951) 413-3206
Prepared for: Charles andDanMoothart
MultiVac, Inc.

P.O.Box 1627
LagunaBeach, CA 92652
(619) 966-9589
USGSQuadrangle: Sunnymead,Calif.,7.5'quadrangle(Section14,T3SR3W,SanBernardino Baseline andMeridian)
Project Size: Approximately 14 acres
Keywords: Moreno Valley area,Riverside County; PhaseI historical/archaeological resources survey; Assessor'sParcelNos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006; no "historical resources" affected 1112

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
In March and April 2014, at the request of MultiVac, Inc., CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 14 acres of undeveloped land in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The subject property of the study, Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, consists of Assessor's Parcel Nos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006, located on the north side of Cactus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street, in the northeast quarter of Section 14, T3S R3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The study is part of the environmental review process for a proposed residential development project with both single-family and condominium components. The City of Moreno Valley, as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The purpose of the study is to provide the City of Moreno Valley with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area, as mandated by CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out an intensive-level field survey of the entire project area.

Through the various avenues of research, this study did not encounter any "historical resources," as defined by CEQA, within or adjacent to the project area. Therefore, CRM TECH recommends to the City of Moreno Valley a finding of No Impact regarding cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for the project unless development plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. However, if buried cultural materials are encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance ofthe finds.

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
In March and April 2014, at therequest of MultiVac, Inc., CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 14 acres ofundeveloped land in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The subject property of the study, Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, consists of Assessor's Parcel Nos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006, located on the north side of Cactus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street, in the northeast quarter of Section 14, T3S R3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The study is part of the environmental review process for a proposed residential development project with both single-family andcondominiumcomponents. The City of Moreno Valley, as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The purpose of the study is to provide the City of Moreno Valley with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area, as mandatedby CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out an intensive-level field survey of the entire project area.

Through the various avenues of research, this study did not encounter any "historical resources,” as defined by CEQA, within or adjacent to the project area. Therefore, CRM TECH recommends to the City of Moreno Valley a finding of No Impact regarding cultural resources. No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for the project unless development plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. However, if buried cultural materials are encountered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that areashould be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluatethe nature and significance of the finds.
1113

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY i
INTRODUCTION 1
SETTING 4
Current Natural Setting 4
Cultural Setting 4
Prehistoric Context 4
Ethnohistoric Context 5
Historic Context 5
RESEARCH METHODS 6
Records Search 6
Historical Research 7
Native American Participation 7
Field Survey 7
RESULTS AND FINDINGS 7
Records Search 7
Historical Research 10
Native American Participation 11
Field Survey 12
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS 12
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13
REFERENCES 14
APPENDIX 1: Personnel Qualifications 16
APPENDIX 2: Correspondence with Native American Representatives 20

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project vicinity 1
Figure 2. Project area 2
Figure 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 36740 3
Figure 4. Typical landscapes within the project area 4
Figure 5. Previous cultural resources studies 8
Figure 6. The project area and vicinity in 1853-1855 10 Figure 7. The project area and vicinity in 1897-1898 10 Figure 8. The project area and vicinity in 1939 11
Figure 9. The project area and vicinity in 1951-1953 11

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources in the Project Vicinity 9 n

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY...ocoiriiiiininiecrinenrentesnenssesesssssssessessssssssssssssssssssessessessssassassassesssssessenes i INTRODUCTION.....ocoiiiiririinrniininsiniieretsessesssssesesssssssessessessssssasessastessssessassessesessassessensessessssarssssenss1 SETTING....oiiitiiririneninteisisestesessessesessassestesesessesssesssessessessesessssesssssessessessesssessessessesessesssssesassassasses4 Current Natural SEINE........ccceeereeinrirerriniiernienrereenrrseisesessesesassasssessassessessesssessersassessssssesssesses4 CUIUTAL SEINE......oouievirieieniieniieiereenteieseeserteetesteastsee tasersseessssesaesessssessssessssssansassssesensasassesensensasens4 PrEhiStOTIC COMEXL....cuceuirueenireererersnarnreseesesenesssnesisensessessasessssesnstessessessesessssasssessssensessessessesessenns 4 EthnohiStoric CONLEXL ......ccorererrernreeiereeinniireeenieenrerenseesnesrisseseessesessesseessaessssssessessessssssessessssssassen 5 HiStOTICCONLEXL ...ceeurrererererariririenreniestenseeeerasseeseessieeesesssestssarasasseseassassessssnsassensasssssssssssssrsssssenssess 5 RESEARCHMETHODS.......ccivniriiienitneneneenerereesnesissesasssessssssessastosessessassassssassessestasessassassensenssssans6 RECOTAS SEATCH.......ccueiniiieiieiiiiceieteer etree cress estasaseeseesreessessasessestesenssanesesnessensaseasesasssens6 HiStOTICAl RESEATCH cuvettes srssresesaserestesaasbssbestssstatessbansaaseessarsasnnnn7 Native American PartiCiPation...........coeeeermrininriciinniniinenennssissieseesesesesssssesesssssesessessessessossesseses7 FIEIASUIVEY«ouverte sieestestssrieestessesse nesses ses sessessessesessessssssestassasasssassasssansarssssassnssnensesnnannsn 7 RESULTSAND FINDINGS........coeviiiiiniereesteninesressesiorsssssesssssssssssssssessssssssessssessessessssessassasssssosssssss7 RECOTAS SEATCH.....c.ceevirirerritrrrirrnrinrienieeererecsestesesieseesessesessessessesessessessestssestessessssessesassersesessessens7 HiStOriCal RESEAICH .....cuoveiiiieiieeirietrtneecteriete seesrcerensereeseesseesseresressestessassssnssnesssessensessessans10 Native AmericanPartiCIPation........c.coeeeerirrienereentenenennienrenestesteseesniessseessessessessesssesssssssssssaesssssans11 FIEIA SUIVEY...crevieeerteenereeecteereerenenereeeateesennesessnssssseenssssesesssestasaessessssssensesssnasssessassasssessesassssnns 12 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS........ccceoieiirtenerineereresenessessesseressessaseesessessessssnssassessessssesanses 12 CONCLUSIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS.....cocoviirerinennerearensenreressessensesessessesassessessesseseesaeness13 REFERENCES...........oootiietiienieitetereneesentetesessesteste essessssesassessesssssssessantsnsastsesssessenssessesnenssssssessans 14 APPENDIX1:PersonnelQUalifiCatiOns ..........ccevcereereersereseereereisrsneensessssseessessesassssssssssaessssansesasnns 16 APPENDIX 2: CorrespondencewithNative AmericanRepresentatives...........ceeeevenverreeceeereneniannne20

LIST OFFIGURES
Figure 1. Project VICIIILY.....ccecoreieriririniinicriienieneienreessinseessestssssesessasessesseessestesssnssasssssssessesessssnsasseane 1 FIigUIE2. PIOJECE TEA .....ccceeerirreriiricrinririenreeresaseesesssessestesssssesesssessesssssessessteniossessassassessassssssessassasssens 2 Figure 3. Tentative Tract Map NO. 36740 ........ccocerreerrircrrnenrinnetrernsssensssnsssssessnssssnssssesssessessersassssnsane 3 Figure 4. Typical landscapeswithin the project area...........ceccererererercerienierenrneeseesrenesesseeseseasesenens 4 Figure5. Previous culturalreSources StUAIies........ccccveeerirrereecrerersesensaressessescssnesnsersssessssssesarssnesasssns8 Figure 6. The project areaand vicinity in 1853-1855......c.cooioinrrininirecrerienenrecreseeeeneeeeennesesnenne10 Figure 7. Theproject areaandvicinity in 1897-1898.........c.ccoverrrrerercrrnrererenieresseesesssssnesernssesesnes10 Figure8. Theproject areaandvicinity in 1939.........cccvvrrrercnrnrcrenrniercrnnnenssesssssseessesacesessnesasssesns 11 Figure 9. Theproject areaand vicinity in1951-1953........ccrrorrrrcienennnerrceererereeeeeesreeneseesnenns 11

LIST OF TABLES
Table1. PreviouslyRecordedCulturalResourcesin theProjectVicinity ........ccccoceevcerrreererruceccnennennes 9 1114ii

INTRODUCTION
In March and April 2014, at the request of MultiVac, Inc., CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 14 acres of undeveloped land in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (Fig. 1). The subject property ofthe study, Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, consists of Assessor's Parcel Nos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006, located on the north side ofCactus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street, in the northeast quarter of Section 14, T3S R3W, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (Fig. 2). The study is part ofthe environmental review process for a proposed residential development project with both single-family and condominium components (Fig. 3). The City of Moreno Valley, as the lead agency for the project, required the study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; PRC §21000, et seq.).

CRM TECH performed the present study to provide the City of Moreno Valley with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed project would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area, as mandated by CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate such resources, CRM TECH conducted a historical/archaeological resources records search, pursued historical background research, contacted Native American representatives, and carried out an intensive-level field survey. The following report is a complete account ofthe methods, results, and final conclusion ofthe study. Personnel who participated in the study are named in the appropriate sections below and their qualifications are provided in Appendix 1.
jSANflB£R'N*RrKNO CO. ^_"™
fl? HtVERSIQE CO ~ §§| *-V
SCALE 1:250,000 1:250,000 AY-'V" \<* U> ~T'"' "~v '^ M^^ZT^ 5 10 miles Figure 1. Project vicinity. (Based on USGS Santa Ana and San Bernardino, Calif., 1:250,000 quadrangles [USGS 1969; 1979])

INTRODUCTION
InMarch andApril 2014,attherequestofMultiVac, Inc., CRM TECHperformedacultural resources study on approximately 14 acresofundeveloped land in the City ofMoreno Valley, Riverside County, California (Fig. 1). The subjectproperty of the study, Tentative Tract Map No. 36740, consists of Assessor'sParcelNos. 478-110-002, -007, 478-120-001, -002, -005, and -006, located on the north side of CactusAvenue betweenRedlandsBoulevard and Wilmot Street,in the northeast quarter of Section 14, T3S R3W, SanBernardino Baseline andMeridian (Fig. 2). The study is part of the environmental review process for aproposedresidential developmentproject withboth single-familyandcondominiumcomponents(Fig. 3). TheCity ofMorenoValley, as the leadagency for theproject,requiredthe studyin compliancewith theCaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA;PRC §21000,et seq.).

CRM TECHperformed thepresent study to provide the City ofMoreno Valley with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposedproject would cause substantial adverse changes to any historical/archaeological resources that may exist in or around the project area,as mandatedby CEQA. In order to identify and evaluate suchresources,CRM TECH conducteda historical/archaeological resourcesrecords search,pursuedhistorical background research, contacted Native Americanrepresentatives,andcarriedout anintensive-levelfield survey. The following report is a complete accountof themethods,results, and final conclusion of the study. Personnel who participated in the study arenamedin the appropriate sectionsbelow and their qualifications are providedin Appendix 1.
r
’ Sl ‘f= ghgro . ag
n Bernardino Quad. nta Ana Quad.
es Lid EN
~~ location x Ratio
Po cane, . ire Jp station dies oF Sad
aly 5 = XX
I SRN oy 7. hedii ie iy ASG ~\ %
bi ~ a SAYoN NE
ee av. ad uv, CON : { {0~ g ~ ASN Ne ht i Sn
Figure 1. Project vicinity. (Based onUSGS SantaAna and SanBernardino,Calif, 1:250,000 quadrangles [USGS 1969; 1979)
pon] Row &
SCALE 1:250,000
5 RAEN LAE
a
1115
Figure 2. Project area. (Based on USGS Sunnymead, Calif, 1:24,000 quadrangle [USGS 1980]) » PEL HEC TE Re
Te, fe hn]
, ~. RW ARS
*. fli...» ,
. , a, na
FT 00 .
. re mmm Soar A EE 3 hi - ==
Figure 2. Projectarea. (BasedonUSGSSunnymead,Calif, 1:24,000quadrangle[USGS1980]) 1116

IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT 0. 36740
^miss
1 GRAPHIC SCALE
Figure 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 36740.
fom
==
Va
so
-
,
J.
14 End
od; fi. A
pe] =. =-
(7)
<
<
PRE AY —
I O Erneta lp Joo iy \ NE (ATCA MAN h Nd 5) \
= i Wh ~T AF \ Nil 3 Co) 0 (4 1 i 2) WN \
S MY asm {i 4 a , J ath \ hE AIT SFE oT Bry Ee NEE NATRRNERIN S RT AmW ty LF RIAN ONT w O THIN Lf Lesa RN fy } NR H | J i) 153 AY 1 EET \ i NSN a) NSN =X < ; i \r i RY i I. \ JH ANN ail
nn C70 UI J i 0 WR
) HTT ROH IE ARES >= SF ] NI i A 1 £, EIN NY
353 70) AL ET as EE ORR
3 2 Pray NLS
1ZNSEWe SSR Jie PALS p i I oy 21 aod \_
o h CO | / 3 ty ERR
~
Q Or AINA, FESRUBEN he
Ly I~ 3g & hh i%% JX 5 ANC TT NR =~"
SIE =o | I IRI Tk LR YRPre
= Lu gmat LL DE SIL CT LT WL> a) YS S = ) 2 Bs v = : . RPA RIA = INR ENE ESE SilTras
I~ <( be ; 3 oon pom Lovw A od oy 0 ) i Co i i
O a HL i LR a - a t
Il oy so JN ob Neen i X ins ba T 2 = a= : =k gE
SS wa AL CETERA
r
[RRR rap TW SP
for
Figure3. TentativeTractMapNo. 36740.
1117

SETTING

CURRENT NATURAL SETTING
The City of Moreno Valley is situated within the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province, generally surrounded by the Santa Ana Mountains on the southwest, the San Jacinto Mountains on the southeast, and the convergence ofthe San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountain Ranges on the north. The natural landscape in the province features various inland valleys divided by groups of rolling hills and rocky knolls. The climate in the area is mild and temperate, with an average annual rainfall of approximately 12 inches.

The project area lies near the northwest base of Mount Russell and consists oftwo separate but adjoining tracts. The northwestern portion is bounded on the north by Brodiaea Avenue and on the west by Wilmot Street. On the east and the south, it adjoins open fields. The southeastern portion is bounded on the south by Cactus Avenue is surrounded by open fields on the north, west, and east.

Elevations in the project area range around 1,575-1,600 feet above mean sea level. The property appears to have been used for agricultural purposes in the past, and parts ofthe ground surface have been impacted by construction activities along an earthen wash (Fig. 4). Soils on the property consist of a mixture offine- to medium-grained sands, small to medium rocks, and decomposing granite. Vegetation observed in the project area includes Indian tobacco, fiddlenecks, wild mustard, datura, tumbleweeds, and other small shrubs and grasses (Fig. 4).

SETTING

CURRENT NATURAL SETTING
TheCity ofMorenoValley is situatedwithin theTransverseRangesgeomorphicprovince,generally surroundedby theSantaAnaMountainson thesouthwest,theSanJacintoMountains on the southeast,andtheconvergenceof theSanGabrielandSanBernardinoMountainRangeson the north. The natural landscapein theprovince features various inland valleys dividedby groups of rollinghills androcky knolls. Theclimatein theareais mild andtemperate,with anaverageannual rainfall of approximately12inches.

Theproject arealiesnearthenorthwestbaseofMount Russellandconsistsof two separatebut adjoining tracts. The northwesternportion is bounded on the northbyBrodiaca Avenue and on the west by Wilmot Street. On the east and the south, it adjoins open fields. The southeasternportionis bounded on the southby CactusAvenue is surroundedby open fields on the north, west, and east.

Elevations in the project arearange around 1,575-1,600 feet abovemean sealevel. The property appears to have beenused for agricultural purposesin the past, andparts of the ground surfacehave been impactedby construction activities along an earthenwash (Fig. 4). Soils on the property consist of amixture of fine- to medium-grained sands, small to mediumrocks, and decomposing granite. Vegetation observedin the project areaincludes Indian tobacco, fiddlenecks, wildmustard, datura,tumbleweeds,andother small shrubsandgrasses(Fig. 4).

CULTURAL SETTING
Prehistoric Context
It is widely acknowledgedthathumanoccupationin whatis now theStateof Californiabegan 8,000-12,000 years ago. In order to understandNative American cultures before European contact, archaeologistshave devised chronological frameworks that endeavorto correlate the observable technologicalandcultural changesin thearchaeologicalrecordto distinctperiods. Unfortunately, Figure 4. Typical landscapes within the project area. Left: northwesternportion of the property, view to the southeast; right. southeasternportion of theproperty, view to the southwest, along the earthen wash. (Photos taken onMarch 21, 2014)
1118
none ofthese chronological frameworks has been widely accepted, and none has been developed specifically for the so-called Inland Empire region ofsouthern California, the nearest ones being for the Colorado Desert and Peninsular Ranges area (Warren 1984) and for the Mojave Desert (Warren and Crabtree 1986).

The development of an overall chronological framework for the region is hindered by the lack of distinct stratigraphic layers of cultural sequences that could be dated by absolute dating methods.

Since results from archaeological investigations in this region have yet to be synthesized into an overall chronological framework, most archaeologists tend to follow a chronology adapted from a scheme developed by William J. Wallace in 1955 and modified by others (Wallace 1955; 1978; Warren 1968; Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984; Moratto 1984). Although the beginning and ending dates ofthe different horizons or periods may vary, the general framework of prehistory in this region under this chronology consists ofthe following four periods:
• Early Hunting Stage (ca. 10000-6000 B.C.), which was characterized by human reliance on big game animals, as evidenced by large, archaic-style projectile points and the relative lack of plantprocessing artifacts; • Millingstone Horizon (ca. 6000 B.C.-1000 A.D.), when plant foods and small game animals came to the forefront ofsubsistence strategies, and from which a large number ofmillingstones, especially heavily used, deep-basin metates, were left; • Late Prehistoric Period (ca. 1000-1500 A.D.), during which a more complex social organization, a more diversified subsistence base—as evidenced by smaller projectile points, expedient milling stones and, later, pottery—and regional cultures and tribal territories began to develop; • Protohistoric Period (ca. 1500-1700s A.D.), which ushered in long-distance contact with Europeans and led to the historic period.

Ethnohistoric Context
According to current ethnohistorical scholarship, the present-day Riverside-Moreno Valley area lies on the edge between the traditional territories ofthree Native American groups: the Serrano ofthe San Bernardino Mountains, the Luiseno ofthe Perris-Elsinore region, and the Gabrielino ofthe San Gabriel Valley. Kroeber (1925:Plate 57) suggests that the Native Americans ofthe Riverside area were probably Luiseno, Reid (1968:8-9) states that they were Serrano, and Strong (1929:7-9, 275) claims that they were Gabrielino. In any case, there also occurred a late influx ofCahuilla during the 19th century (Bean 1978).

Whatever the linguistic affiliation, Native Americans in the Riverside-Moreno Valley area exhibited similar social organization and resource procurement strategies. Villages were based on clan or lineage groups. Their home/base sites are marked by midden deposits, often with bedrock mortar features. During their seasonal rounds to exploit plant resources, small groups often ranged some distances in search ofspecific plants and animals. Their gathering strategies often left behind signs ofspecial use sites, usually grinding slicks on bedrock boulders, at the locations ofthe resources.

Historic Context
In comparison to other nearby communities such as Riverside and San Jacinto, the City of Moreno Valley is a "late-boomer" both in early development in the 19th century and in urban growth in the noneof thesechronologicalframeworkshasbeenwidely accepted,andnonehasbeendeveloped specifically for theso-calledInlandEmpireregion of southernCalifornia, thenearest onesbeing for the Colorado Desert andPeninsularRangesarea(Warren 1984) and for the MojaveDesert (Warren and Crabtree 1986).

Thedevelopmentof anoverall chronological framework for theregionis hinderedby thelack of distinct stratigraphic layersof cultural sequencesthat couldbe datedby absolutedatingmethods.

Sinceresults from archaeological investigations in this regionhave yet to be synthesizedinto an overall chronological framework, most archaeologists tend to follow a chronology adaptedfrom a schemedevelopedby William J. Wallace in 1955 andmodifiedby others (Wallace 1955; 1978; Warren1968;ChartkoffandChartkoff1984;Moratto1984). Althoughthebeginningandending dates of the different horizons or periods may vary, the general framework ofprehistory in this regionunderthis chronology consistsof the following four periods:
e Early Hunting Stage(ca. 10000-6000B.C.), which was characterizedby humanreliance onbig gameanimals,asevidencedby large,archaic-styleprojectilepoints andtherelativelack ofplantprocessing artifacts; e Millingstone Horizon (ca. 6000B.C.-1000 A.D.), whenplant foods and small game animals cameto the forefront of subsistence strategies, and from which a large number ofmillingstones, especially heavily used, deep-basinmetates,were left;
e LatePrehistoric Period (ca. 1000-1500 A.D.), during which amore complex social organization, amorediversifiedsubsistencebase—asevidencedby smallerprojectilepoints,expedientmilling stones and, later, pottery—andregional cultures and tribalterritories began to develop; e ProtohistoricPeriod(ca. 1500-1700sA.D.), whichusheredinlong-distancecontactwith Europeansandled to thehistoric period.

Ethnohistoric Context
According to current ethnohistorical scholarship, the present-dayRiverside-Moreno Valley arealies on the edgebetween the traditional territories ofthreeNative American groups: the Serrano of the SanBernardino Mountains, the Luisefio of the Perris-Elsinore region, and the Gabrielino ofthe San Gabriel Valley. Kroeber (1925:Plate 57) suggests that theNative Americans of the Riverside area were probably Luisefio, Reid (1968:8-9) states that they were Serrano,and Strong (1929:7-9, 275) claims that they were Gabrielino. In any case,there also occurred a late influx of Cahuilla during the 19th century (Bean 1978).

Whateverthelinguistic affiliation,NativeAmericansintheRiverside-MorenoValleyareaexhibited similar social organization andresourceprocurement strategies. Villages werebasedon clan or lineage groups. Their home/base sites aremarked by midden deposits,often withbedrock mortar features. During their seasonalrounds to exploit plant resources, small groups oftenranged some distances in searchof specific plants and animals. Their gathering strategiesoften left behind signs of specialuse sites,usually grinding slicks onbedrock boulders, at the locations of the resources.

Historic Context
In comparisonto othernearbycommunities suchasRiversideandSanJacinto,theCity ofMoreno Valley is a "late-boomer"bothin earlydevelopmentin the19thcenturyandinurbangrowthin the 1119
20th. By the mid-19th century, the area that constitutes present-day Moreno Valley remained essentially uninhabited, despite its location on a plain surrounded by several large Mexican land grants. In 1853-1855, when the U.S. government initiated the first official land survey in southern California, the only man-made features observed in the area were a few roads crisscrossing the desert floor, including a wagon road from San Bernardino to Temecula, a second one leading to San Jacinto, and several unidentified roads or trails.

The Moreno Valley area remained unclaimed public land until 1870, when a large tract of 13,471 acres was purchased from the U.S. government in one single transaction (BLM n.d.). It was on this vast acquisition that the 11,560-acre Alessandro Tract and the town of Alessandro, where the March Air Reserve Base lies today, were laid out and offered to settlers in 1887 (Gunther 1984:11), during a land boom that swept through southern California in the 1880s. After this initial development scheme failed, the developers of Redlands in San Bernardino County, fresh from their acclaimed success in creating the Bear Valley reservoir and the thriving Redlands colony, took over the Alessandro Tract with the intention ofirrigating the land with an elaborate water system (ibid.).

Water from the Bear Valley reservoir reached the Moreno Valley area in 1891, ushering in a few years of prosperity in the early 1890s. Two more communities came into being in the vicinity during this brief boom: New Haven, soon to be renamed Moreno, and Midland, also known as Armada (Gunther 1984:323, 333). However, the boom soon turned to bust during the drought ofthe late 1890s, when Bear Valley water was no longer delivered to the Moreno Valley area. As a result, the budding towns in the area became largely abandoned, and many ofthe buildings were taken up and moved to Riverside (ibid.:\3, 334).

During the early 20th century, the Moreno Valley area began to recover slowly. In 1912, a 1,100- acre portion ofthe original Alessandro Tract was re-subdivided as the Sunnymead Orchard Tract (County Surveyor 1912), thus bestowing on the community formerly known as Midland or Armada the new name of Sunnymead. Eleven years later, a series ofland development projects began just to the west of Sunnymead, which ultimately resulted in the establishment ofthe community of Edgemont (Gunther 1984:171-172).

Despite these development efforts, Moreno Valley's economic prospect was severely hampered by the lack ofreliable water supply until 1973, after the completion ofthe California Aqueduct and its southern terminus, Lake Perris (Gunther 1984:334). Since then, the promise of affordable housing brought an influx of commuters to the Moreno Valley area, setting off a period ofrapid growth and urbanization. By 1984, when residents in the communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, and Edgemont voted to incorporate as the City ofMoreno Valley, the new city had already become the second most populous in Riverside County (ibid.), thanks mainly to its attraction as a "bedroom community."

RESEARCH METHODS

RECORDS SEARCH
On March 19, 2014, CRM TECH archaeologist Nina Gallardo (see App. 1 for qualifications) conducted the historical/archaeological resources records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), University ofCalifornia, Riverside. During the records search, Gallardo examined maps and 20th. By themid-19thcentury,theareathat constitutespresent-dayMorenoValley remained essentiallyuninhabited,despiteits locationona plain surroundedby severallargeMexicanland grants. In 1853-1855, when theU.S. government initiated the first official land survey in southern California, the only man-made features observedin the areawere a few roads crisscrossingthe desert floor, including a wagonroad from SanBernardino to Temecula, a secondoneleading to San Jacinto,and severalunidentifiedroadsor trails.

The Moreno Valley arearemainedunclaimedpublic landuntil 1870, when alarge tract of 13,471 acres waspurchased from the U.S. government in one single transaction (BLMn.d.). It was on this vast acquisition that the 11,560-acreAlessandro Tract and the town of Alessandro, where the March Air ReserveBaselies today, were laid out and offered to settlersin 1887 (Gunther 1984:11), during a landboom that swept through southernCalifornia in the 1880s. After this initial development scheme failed, the developersofRedlandsin SanBernardino County, fresh from their acclaimed successin creating the Bear Valley reservoir and the thrivingRedlands colony, took over the Alessandro Tract with the intention ofirrigating the land with an elaboratewater system(ibid.).

Water from theBear Valley reservoir reachedthe Moreno Valley areain 1891, usheringin a few yearsofprosperity in the early 1890s. Two more communities cameinto being in the vicinity during thisbriefboom:NewHaven, soontoberenamedMoreno,andMidland,alsoknownasArmada (Gunther 1984:323,333). However,theboomsoonturnedto bust duringthedroughtof thelate 1890s, whenBear Valley water wasno longer delivered to the Moreno Valley area. As a result, the budding towns in the areabecamelargely abandoned, andmany ofthebuildings were takenup and moved to Riverside (ibid.:13, 334).

During the early 20th century, the Moreno Valley areabegan to recover slowly. In 1912, a 1,100- acreportion of the original AlessandroTract wasre-subdivided as the SunnymeadOrchard Tract (County Surveyor 1912), thusbestowing on the community formerly known asMidland or Armada the new name of Sunnymead. Eleven years later, a seriesofland developmentprojects began just to thewestof Sunnymead,whichultimatelyresultedin theestablishmentofthecommunityof Edgemont(Gunther1984:171-172).

Despite thesedevelopment efforts, Moreno Valley's economic prospect was severelyhamperedby the lack ofreliable water supply until 1973, after the completion of the California Aqueduct andits southernterminus, Lake Perris (Gunther 1984:334). Since then, the promise of affordable housing brought an influx of commuters to the Moreno Valley area, setting off aperiod ofrapid growth and urbanization. By 1984, whenresidentsin the communities ofMoreno, Sunnymead,andEdgemont voted to incorporate as the City ofMoreno Valley, the new city had alreadybecome the secondmost populous in Riverside County (ibid.), thanksmainly to its attraction as a "bedroom community."

RESEARCHMETHODS

RECORDS SEARCH
On March 19, 2014, CRM TECH archaeologistNina Gallardo (seeApp. 1 for qualifications) conducted thehistorical/archaeologicalresourcesrecords searchat theEasternInformation Center (EIC),University of California,Riverside. During therecords search,Gallardoexaminedmapsand 1120
records on file at the EIC for previously identified cultural resources in or near the project area and existing cultural resources reports pertaining to the vicinity. Previously identified cultural resources include properties designated as California Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, or Riverside County Landmarks, as well as those listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the California Historical Resources Inventory.

General Land Office's (GLO) land survey plat map dated 1855 and the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) topographic maps dated 1901-1953. These maps are collected at the Science Library ofthe University ofCalifornia, Riverside, and the California Desert District ofthe U.S. Bureau of Land Management, located in Moreno Valley.

NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION
On March 19, 2014, CRM TECH sent a written request to the State ofCalifornia's Native American Heritage Commission for a records search in the commission's sacred lands file. Following the commission's recommendations, CRM TECH further contacted a total of 14 tribal representatives in the region in writing on March 26 to solicit local Native American input regarding any potential cultural resources concerns over the proposed project. In addition, CRM TECH notified the nearby Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians ofthe upcoming archaeological fieldwork and invited the tribe to participate. The Soboba Band subsequently assigned a Native American monitor to accompany CRM TECH personnel on the field survey (see below). All written correspondences between CRM TECH and Native American representatives are attached to this report in Appendix 2.

FIELD SURVEY
On March 21, 2014, CRM TECH archaeologists Daniel Ballester (see App. 1 for qualifications) and Nina Gallardo carried out the intensive-level, pedestrian field survey ofthe project area. They were accompanied during the survey by Native American monitor Kenny Hernandez from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. The survey was completed by walking parallel north-south transects spaced 15 meters (approx. 50 feet) apart. In this way, the ground surface in the entire project area was systematically and carefully examined for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic period (i.e., 50 years ago or older). Ground visibility ranged from poor (approx. 20%) in areas with dense vegetation cover to fair (approx. 70%) in areas with sparse flora.

RESULTS AND FINDINGS

RECORDS SEARCH
Records ofthe EIC indicate that the project area was partially covered by a survey completed in 2012 (Tang et al. 2012; Fig. 5), but no cultural resources were previously recorded on or adjacent to recordson file at theEIC for previouslyidentifiedculturalresourcesin or neartheproject areaand existingculturalresourcesreportspertainingto thevicinity. Previouslyidentified culturalresources includeproperties designatedasCaliforniaHistoricalLandmarks,PointsofHistoricalInterest,or RiversideCountyLandmarks,aswell as thoselistedin theNationalRegisterofHistoricPlaces,the California Register ofHistorical Resources,or the California Historical ResourcesInventory.

GeneralLandOffice's (GLO) land surveyplat map dated1855andtheU.S. GeologicalSurvey's (USGS)topographicmapsdated1901-1953. ThesemapsarecollectedattheScienceLibrary ofthe University of California, Riverside, and the CaliforniaDesert District of the U.S. Bureau ofLand Management, located in Moreno Valley.

NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION
OnMarch 19,2014,CRM TECH sentawrittenrequestto theStateof California'sNative American HeritageCommissionfor arecords searchin thecommission's sacredlands file. Following the commission's recommendations, CRM TECH further contacteda total of 14 tribalrepresentativesin the region in writing on March 26 to solicit localNative American input regarding any potential cultural resources concerns over theproposedproject. In addition, CRM TECH notified the nearby SobobaBand of Luisefio Indians of the upcoming archaeological fieldwork andinvited the tribe to participate. The SobobaBand subsequently assignedaNative American monitor to accompany CRM TECHpersonnel on the field survey (seebelow). All written correspondencesbetween CRM TECH andNative Americanrepresentatives are attachedto this report in Appendix 2.

FIELD SURVEY
OnMarch 21, 2014,CRM TECH archaeologistsDanielBallester(seeApp. 1 for qualifications) and Nina Gallardo carriedout theintensive-level,pedestrianfield surveyof theproject area. They were accompaniedduring the surveyby Native Americanmonitor Kenny Hernandez from the Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians. The survey was completedby walkingparallel north-south transects spaced15 meters (approx. 50 feet) apart. In this way, the ground surfacein the entire project area was systematically and carefully examined for any evidenceofhuman activities dating to the prehistoric or historic period (i.e., 50 years ago or older). Ground visibility ranged frompoor (approx. 20%) in areas with densevegetation cover to fair (approx. 70%) in areas with sparse flora.

RESULTS AND FINDINGS

RECORDS SEARCH
Records of theEIC indicate that theproject areawaspartially coveredby a survey completedin 2012 (Tang et al. 2012; Fig. 5), but no culturalresourceswere previously recorded on or adjacentto 1121
Scope of
£i records ^A
SCALE 1:24,000
0 1000 2000 feet
Figure 5. Previous culturalresources studies in the vicinityof the projectarea, listedby EIC file number. Locations of historical/archaeological sites are not shown as a protective measure. > i H ee .~ ( r™ Ny Se a
SAS { cope 0 INEZ DK SN \ Ne spo _ Z\ records Zoo) | £7TU S— FAN search [¢2eg02 ; Try me \ WIN 8689 3 | :
pre 8802 - Fons H,
| her
pre gs =
= =
[ns 8 BE w 2:8 SEO == } [SO fie 2 : HO fRATEETA oa IS HR + I ES EEE 8802\ I” 7 ;

7. > Cc lk fey
A A | A N i : /
1000
Project area
Areas previously
surveyed
Linear surveys
SCALE 1:24,000
0 1000 2000 feet
Figure5. Previousculturalresourcesstudiesin thevicinity of theprojectarea,listedbyEIC file number. Locationsof historical/archaeological sites arenot shown as a protective measure. 1122
Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within the Scope of the Records Search Site No. Recorded by/Date Description
33-000419 McCarthy 1988; Desautels 1983; Chace and
Shepard 1963
Habitation area with milling features and rock art
33-000420 Desautels 1983; O'Neil 1968 Bedrock milling outcrop 33-000421 McCarthy 1988; Desautels 1983; O'Neil 1968;
Chace and Shepard 1963
Bedrock milling outcrops and rock art
33-000860 Michael Brandman Associates 2006; Neiditch
1987; Lipp and Weaver 1976
Bedrock milling outcrops
33-002863 Drover 1984 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002952 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002953 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002954 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002955 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002956 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002957 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002958 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002959 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002960 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002961 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002962 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002963 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002964 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002967 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002993 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-003307 Peter and Carbone 1987 Bedrock milling outcrops 33-003323 Sampson 1987 Bedrock milling outcrops
33-003343 Dice 2006; Neiditch 1987 Bedrock milling outcrop 33-003344 Dice 2006; Neiditch 1987 Bedrock milling outcrop 33-003345 Dice 2006; Neiditch 1987 Bedrock milling outcrop 33-003346 Dice 2006; Arkush 1990; McCarthy and
Neiditch 1987
Bedrock milling outcrops
33-003347 Michael Brandman Associates 2011; Arkush
1990; McCarthy and Neiditch 1987
Bedrock milling outcrops, pestle, and lithic debitage
33-007278 Warner 1983 Moreno School (Point of Historical Interest) 33-011606 Goodwin 2002 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-013109 Mason 1983 Historic-period structural debris
33-015045 Dice 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015046 Dice 2006; Arkush 1990; Salpas 1984 Bedrock milling outcrops 33-015148 Moslak 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015149 Moslak 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015150 Moslak 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-019919 Cotterman2010 Historic-period water conveyance system the property. Outside the project boundaries but within a one-mile radius, EIC records show a total of 19 previous cultural resources studies covering various tracts ofland and linear features (Fig. 5).

As a result ofthese and other similar studies in the vicinity, 35 archaeological and a historic-period building have been recorded within the scope ofthe records search, as listed in Table 1. All but one ofthe archaeological sites were of prehistoric-i.e., Native American-origin, consisting primarily of bedrock milling features located on the northwest slopes of Mount Russell, which suggests that this Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within the Scope of the Records Search SiteNo. Recorded by/Date Description
33-000419 McCarthy 1988; Desautels 1983; Chace and Habitation area with milling features androck art Shepard 1963
33-000420 Desautels1983;O'Neil 1968 Bedrockmilling outcrop 33-000421 McCarthy 1988; Desautels 1983; O'Neil 1968; | Bedrockmilling outcrops and rock art Chace and Shepard 1963
33-000860 MichaelBrandmanAssociates2006;Neiditch | Bedrockmilling outcrops 1987; Lipp and Weaver 1976
33-002863 Drover 1984 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002952 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002953 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002954 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002955 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002956 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002957 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002958 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002959 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002960 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002961 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002962 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002963 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-002964 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002967 Banks1983 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-002993 Banks 1983 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-003307 Peter and Carbone 1987 Bedrock milling outcrops 33-003323 Sampson1987 Bedrockmilling outcrops
33-003343 Dice 2006;Neiditch 1987 Bedrockmilling outcrop 33-003344 Dice 2006; Neiditch 1987 Bedrockmilling outcrop 33-003345 Dice 2006;Neiditch 1987 Bedrockmilling outcrop 33-003346 Dice 2006;Arkush1990;McCarthy and Bedrockmilling outcrops Neiditch 1987
33-003347 MichaelBrandmanAssociates2011;Arkush Bedrockmilling outcrops,pestle,andlithic debitage 1990;McCarthy andNeiditch 1987
33-007278 Warner 1983 Moreno School(Point ofHistoricalInterest) 33-011606 Goodwin 2002 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-013109 Mason1983 Historic-periodstructuraldebris
33-015045 Dice 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015046 Dice 2006; Arkush 1990; Salpas 1984 Bedrockmillingoutcrops 33-015148 Moslak 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015149 Moslak 2006 Bedrock milling outcrop
33-015150 Moslak 2006 Bedrockmilling outcrop
33-019919 Cotterman 2010 Historic-period water conveyance system theproperty. Outsidetheprojectboundariesbut within aone-mileradius,EIC records showa total of 19 previous culturalresources studies covering various tracts ofland and linear features(Fig. 5).

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
According to historic maps consulted for this study, the project vicinity showed clear evidence of human activities at least by the mid-19th century, but the project area itself evidently remained unsettled and undeveloped throughout the historic period. In the 1850s, a wagon trail was noted less than a quarter-mile north ofthe project location (Fig. 6). By the late 1890s, the area exhibited typical rural development pattern, featuring a regular grid ofroads lined with scattered buildings, including a few near the project location, around a cluster of buildings in the townsite of Moreno (Fig. 7). Within the project boundaries, however, no evidence of any settlement or development activities was noted at that time (Fig. 7).

If»1~V
*ff<
j41
firo h
Project
''••'Aft", $xi~-
*>
jZIL.I
ea Mtl
'ti*
Nn2H j-^fe
'A.
'*>
g^AJT !*>i\. •"Ss-W-f
>*»
u .#»'V .&
•jr
.• ♦»»' JJ
-*fc Ml £*
2000 4000 feet >•>?,.—«*\\\
Figure 6. The project area and vicinity in 1853-1855.
(Source: GLO 1855)
SCALE 1:125,000
0 1 2 miles
.7 £C I N.-'T^ O ,
ioc ,* ...V / r.--/ S . /
/ /zeai !
YL
Figure 7. The project area and vicinity in 1897-1898.
(Source: USGS 1901)
10 mayhavebeena food-processingareaassociatedwith oneor morenearbyresidentialbases. The onehistoric-periodsitewas theremnantof anirrigation system,andthehistoric-periodbuilding was the Moreno School, a StatePoint ofHistorical Interest. None of thesepreviously recordedresources was located in the immediate vicinity of theproject area,and thusnone of themrequires further consideration during this study.

HISTORICAL RESEARCH
Accordingtohistoricmapsconsultedfor this study,theproject vicinity showedclearevidenceof human activities at leastby the mid-19th century, but theproject areaitself evidently remained unsettledandundevelopedthroughout thehistoricperiod. In the1850s,a wagontrail wasnotedless thanaquarter-milenorthof theprojectlocation(Fig. 6). By thelate1890s,theareaexhibited typical rural developmentpattern, featuring aregular grid ofroads lined with scatteredbuildings, includinga fewneartheprojectlocation,arounda clusterofbuildingsinthetownsiteofMoreno (Fig. 7). Within theproject boundaries,however, no evidenceof any settlement or development activities wasnoted at that time (Fig. 7).

Between the 1890s and the 1950s,the present-dayMoreno Valley areamaintained a slow but steady growth (Figs. 8, 9). In the late 1930s,it was observedthat all of the buildings and roads located closest to theproject areain the 1890shadbeen abandoned,including the forerunnersofBrodiaea Avenue, RedlandsBoulevard, and Cactus Avenue (Fig. 8), which probably reflected the regression in growth that occurredin theareafollowing thedroughtof the1890s. As late as the1950s,no buildings or other man-made features were known to bepresent within the project area(Fig. 9). x wm
K TP
r \ sR BEE — I
| | [Project]
fn area |
IR RRR ve a — 1
ad tl . g II
SCALE 1:125,000
I 2 miles
Figure6. Theproject areaandvicinity in 1853-1855. Figure7. Theprojectareaandvicinity in1897-1898. (Source: GLO 1855) (Source: USGS 1901)
10 1124
Figure 8. The project area and vicinity in 1939. (Source:

USGS 1942)
Figure 9. The project area and vicinity in 1951-1953.
(Source: USGS 1953)
Based on these historic maps, the project area appears to be relatively low in sensitivity for cultural resources from the historic period.

NATIVE AMERICAN PARTICIPATION
In response to CRM TECH's inquiry, the Native American Heritage Commission reported in a letter dated March 20, 2014, that the sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources within the project area, but recommended that local Native American groups be contacted for further information. For that purpose, the commission provided a list of potential contacts in the region (see App. 2). Upon receiving the commission's response, CRM TECH sent written requests for consultation to all 11 individuals on the referral list and the organizations they represent (see App. 2). In addition, as referred by these tribal representatives or the tribal government staff, the following three individuals were also contacted:
• Yvonne Markle, Environmental Office Manager for the Cahuilla Band ofIndians; • John Gomez, Jr., Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Ramona Band ofCahuilla Indians; • Gabriella Rubalcava, Environmental Director for Santa Rosa Band ofCahuilla Indians.

REDLANDS
A. SS ZIRE
SCALE 1:24,000
0 1000 2000feet |
| ——————— e—— |
FE; Aan fr WY
Figure8. Theproject areaandvicinity in1939. (Source: Figure9. Theprojectareaandvicinity in1951-1953.

USGS1942) (Source:USGS1953)
Basedon thesehistoricmaps,theprojectareaappears toberelativelylow insensitivity for cultural resources from the historic period.

NATIVE AMERICANPARTICIPATION
Inresponseto CRM TECH'sinquiry, theNative AmericanHeritageCommissionreportedin aletter datedMarch 20, 2014, that the sacredlands record searchidentified no Native American cultural resources within theproject area,but recommendedthat localNative American groupsbe contacted for further information. For that purpose,the commission provided a list ofpotential contacts in the region (seeApp. 2). Uponreceiving the commission's response,CRM TECH sent writtenrequests for consultation to all 11 individuals on thereferral list and the organizations they represent(see App. 2). In addition,asreferredby thesetribalrepresentativesor the tribal government staff,the following threeindividualswerealsocontacted:
e Yvonne Markle,Environmental Office Manager for the CahuillaBand ofIndians; e John Gomez, Jr., Cultural ResourcesCoordinator for the RamonaBand of Cahuilla Indians; e GabriellaRubalcava,Environmental Director for SantaRosaBand of Cahuilla Indians.

As of this time, two writtenresponseshave beenreceived. Daniel McCarthy, Director of Cultural ResourcesManagementDepartment for the SanManuel Band ofMissionIndians, repliedby e-mail on March 31, 2014, and statedthat the SanManuelBand was not awareof anyNative American culturalresourceswithin theprojectarea. Therefore,thetribehasno concernsregardingthisproject. 11 1125
In a letter dated March 27, 2014, Joseph Ontiveros, Director ofCultural Resources for the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, identifies the project area as a part of his tribe's Traditional Use Area.

Furthermore, he finds the project location to be close to known sites, and considers it to be highly sensitive to the tribe. Therefore, on behalf ofthe Soboba Band, Mr. Ontiveros requests further consultation with the project developer/landowner, timely updates on project progress, and the presence of a Native American monitor from the Soboba Cultural Resource Department during all ground-disturbing activities on the property.

FIELD SURVEY
The intensive-level field survey produced completely negative results for potential cultural resources within the project area. The entire project area was closely inspected for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic period, but none was found. As stated above, much disturbance has occurred on the property, resulting from past agricultural operations but particularly from construction activities along the wash. Modern refuse and crushed gravel are scattered over much ofthe property, but none ofthe refuse items is of archaeological or historical interest. No buildings, structures, objects, sites, features, or artifact deposits more than 50 years of age were encountered during the field survey.

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The purpose ofthis study is to identify any cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area, and to assist the City of Moreno Valley in determining whether such resources meet the official definition of "historical resources," as provided in the California Public Resources Code, in particular CEQA.

According to PRC §5020.l(j), '"historical resource' includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals ofCalifornia." More specifically, CEQA guidelines state that the term "historical resources" applies to any such resources listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register of historical resources, or determined to be historically significant by the Lead Agency (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(l)-(3)).

Furthermore,he finds the project location to be close to known sites, and considers it to behighly sensitive to the tribe. Therefore, onbehalf of the SobobaBand, Mr. Ontiveros requests further consultationwith theproject developer/landowner,timelyupdatesonprojectprogress,andthe presenceof aNative Americanmonitor from theSobobaCulturalResourceDepartmentduring all ground-disturbingactivities on theproperty.

FIELD SURVEY
Theintensive-level field surveyproducedcompletelynegativeresults for potential culturalresources within the project area. The entire project areawas closely inspected for any evidence ofhuman activities dating to theprehistoric or historic period,but none was found. As statedabove,much disturbancehas occurred on the property,resulting from past agricultural operationsbut particularly from construction activities along the wash. Modern refuse and crushedgravel are scatteredover much of the property, but none of the refuse items is of archaeological or historical interest. No buildings, structures,objects, sites, features,or artifact depositsmore than 50 yearsof agewere encounteredduringthe field survey.

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The purpose of this study is to identify any cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area, andto assist theCity ofMorenoValleyin determiningwhether suchresourcesmeettheofficial definition of "historicalresources," asprovided in the CaliforniaPublic ResourcesCode, in particular CEQA.

AccordingtoPRC §5020.1(j),"historicalresource’includes,but is not limited to, anyobject, building, site, area,place,record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annalsof California." More specifically, CEQA guidelines state that the term "historicalresources" applies to any suchresourceslisted in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register ofHistorical Resources,included in a localregister of historicalresources,or determined to be historically significant by the Lead Agency (Title 14 CCR §15064.5(a)(1)-(3)).

Regarding theproper criteria for the evaluation ofhistorical significance, CEQA guidelines mandate that "a resource shallbe consideredby the lead agency to be ‘historically significant’ if the resource meetsthecriteriaforlisting on theCaliforniaRegisterofHistoricalResources"(Title 14CCR §15064.5(a)(3)). A resourcemaybelistedintheCaliforniaRegisterif it meetsanyofthefollowing criteria:
(1) Is associatedwith events thathavemadea significant contributionto thebroadpatterns ofCalifornia's history and cultural heritage.
(2) Is associatedwith thelives ofpersonsimportantin ourpast. 12 1126
(3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.
(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (PRC §5024.1(c))
The results ofthis study have established that no potential "historical resources" were previously recorded within or adjacent to the project area, and none was encountered during the present survey.

In addition, Native American input during this study did not identify any specific sites oftraditional cultural value in the immediate vicinity, and historic maps show no notable cultural features within the project area during the historic period. Based on these findings, and in light ofthe criteria listed above, the present study concludes that no historical resources exist within or adjacent to theproject area.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CEQA establishes that "a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment" (PRC §21084.1). "Substantial adverse change," according to PRC §5020.l(q), "means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired."
In summary ofthe research results outlined above, no "historical resources," as defined by CEQA, were encountered throughout the course ofthis study. Therefore, CRM TECH presents the following recommendations to the City ofMoreno Valley:
• No historical resources exist within or adjacent to the project area, and thus the project as currently proposed will not cause a substantial adverse change to any known historical resources. • No further cultural resources investigation is necessary for the proposed project unless development plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. • If buried cultural materials are discovered during any earth-moving operations associated with the project, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance ofthe finds.
13 (3) Embodiesthedistinctivecharacteristicsof atype,period,region,or methodof construction,or represents thework of animportant creativeindividual, or possesseshigh artistic values.
(4) Has yielded,or maybe likely to yield, informationimportantinprehistoryor history. (PRC §5024.1(c))
The results of this study have establishedthat no potential "historicalresources" werepreviously recorded within or adjacent to theproject area,andnone was encounteredduring thepresent survey.

In addition,Native American input during this study did not identify any specific sitesof traditional cultural value in the immediate vicinity, andhistoric maps show no notable cultural features within theproject areaduring thehistoricperiod. Basedon these findings,andinlight of thecriterialisted above,thepresent studyconcludes thatnohistoricalresourcesexistwithin or adjacent to theproject area.

REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell John
1978 Cahuilla. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by Robert F. Heizer; pp. 575-587. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

BLM (Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department ofthe Interior) n.d. Online database of U.S. land patents. Http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

Chartkoff, Joseph L., and Kerry Kona Chartkoff
1984 TheArchaeology ofCalifornia. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

County Surveyor, Riverside
1912 Plat map ofthe Sunnymead Orchard Tract; Map Book 9, Page 17. Microfiche on file, Riverside County Surveyor's Office, Riverside.

GLO (General Land Office, U.S. Department ofthe Interior) 1855 Plat Map: Township No. 3 South Range No. 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyed in 1853-1855.

Gunther, Jane Davies
1984 Riverside County, California, Place Names: Their Origins and TheirStories. J. D.

Gunther, Riverside.

Kroeber, Alfred L.
1925 Handbook ofthe Indians ofCalifornia. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.

Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Moratto, Michael J. (ed.)
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

Reid, Hugo
1968 The Indians of Los Angeles County: Hugo Reid's Letters of 1852; edited by Robert F.

Heizer. Southwest Museum Papers 21.

William Duncan
1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University ofCalifornia Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26. Reprinted by Malki Museum Press, Banning, California, 1972.

Tang, Bai "Tom," Michael Hogan, Deirdre Encarnacion, and Daniel Ballester 2012 Phase I Archaeological Assessment: Moreno Master Drainage Plan Revision. Report on file, Eastern Information Center, University ofCalifornia, Riverside.

USGS (United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department ofthe Interior) 1901 Map: Elsinore, Calif. (30', 1:125,000); surveyed in 1897-1898. 1942 Map: Perris, Calif. (15', 1:62,500); aerial photographs taken in 1939. 1953 Map: Sunnymead, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000); aerial photographs taken in 1951, field-checked in 1953.
1969 Map: San Bernardino, Calif. (1:250,000); 1958 edition revised. 1979 Map: Santa Ana, Calif. (1:250,000); 1959 edition revised. 1980 Map: Sunnymead, Calif. (7.5', 1:24,000); 1967 edition photoinspected in 1973; photorevised in 1980
Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwest Journalfor Anthropology 11:214-230.
1978 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 8:

California, edited by Robert F. Heizer; pp. 26-36. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 14 REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell John
1978 Cahuilla. InHandbookofNorth AmericanIndians, Vol. 8: California, editedbyRobert F. Heizer; pp. 575-587. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C.

BLM(Bureau ofLand Management,U.S. Department of the Interior) n.d. OnlinedatabaseofU.S.landpatents. Http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

Chartkoff, JosephL., and KerryKona Chartkoff
1984 TheArchaeologyofCalifornia. StanfordUniversityPress,Stanford.

County Surveyor, Riverside
1912 Plat map ofthe SunnymeadOrchard Tract; Map Book 9, Page17. Microfiche on file, Riverside County Surveyor's Office, Riverside.

GLO (General Land Office,U.S. Department ofthe Interior) 1855 PlatMap: TownshipNo. 3 SouthRangeNo. 3 West,SanBernardinoMeridian; surveyed in 1853-1855.

Gunther, JaneDavies
1984 Riverside County, California, PlaceNames: Their Origins and Their Stories. J.D.

Gunther,Riverside.

Kroeber, Alfred L.
1925 HandbookoftheIndiansofCalifornia. Bureauof AmericanEthnologyBulletin 78.

GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington,D.C.

Moratto, Michael J. (ed.)
1984 CaliforniaArchaeology. AcademicPress,Orlando,Florida.

Reid, Hugo
1968 TheIndiansofLos AngelesCounty:HugoReid'sLettersof 1852;editedbyRobertF.

Heizer. SouthwestMuseumPapers21.

WilliamDuncan
1929 AboriginalSociety in Southern California. University of CaliforniaPublications in AmericanArchaeologyandEthnology26. Reprintedby Malki MuseumPress,Banning, California, 1972.

Tang,Bai "Tom," Michael Hogan, Deirdre Encarnacion, andDaniel Ballester 2012 PhaseI Archaeological Assessment:Moreno Master DrainagePlanRevision. Report on file, EasternInformation Center,University of California, Riverside.

USGS (United StatesGeological Survey,U.S. Department of the Interior) 1901 Map: Elsinore, Calif. (30', 1:125,000); surveyedin 1897-1898. 1942 Map: Perris, Calif. (15, 1:62,500); aerial photographs takenin 1939. 1953 Map: Sunnymead,Calif. (7.5',1:24,000);aerialphotographs takenin 1951,field-checked in1953.
1969 Map: SanBernardino, Calif. (1:250,000); 1958 editionrevised. 1979 Map: SantaAna,Calif. (1:250,000);1959editionrevised. 1980 Map: Sunnymead,Calif. (7.5, 1:24,000); 1967 editionphotoinspectedin 1973; photorevisedin 1980
Wallace, William J.
1955 A SuggestedChronology for SouthernCaliforniaCoastalArchaeology. Southwest Journalfor Anthropology 11:214-230.
1978 Post-PleistoceneArchaeology. InHandbookofNorthAmericanIndians,Vol. 8:

California, editedbyRobertF. Heizer;pp. 26-36. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington,D.C. 14 1128
Warren, Claude N.
1968 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptations on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in Western UnitedStates, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams; pp. 1-14.

Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales, New Mexico. 1984 The Desert Region. In California Archaeology, edited by Michael J. Moratto; pp. 339- 430. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

Warren, Claude N., and Robert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory ofthe Southwestern Area. In Handbook ofNorth American Indians, Vol. 11:

Great Basin, edited by Warren L. D'Azevedo; pp. 183-193. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
15 Warren, ClaudeN.
1968 Cultural Traditions andEcologicalAdaptationson theSouthernCalifornia Coast. In ArchaicPrehistory in Western UnitedStates, editedby Cynthia Irwin-Williams; pp. 1-14.

EasternNew Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales,New Mexico. 1984 The Desert Region. In California Archaeology, edited by Michael J. Moratto; pp. 339- 430. Academic Press,Orlando, Florida.

Warren, ClaudeN., andRobert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory ofthe SouthwesternArea. InHandbook ofNorth AmericanIndians, Vol. 11:

GreatBasin,editedby WarrenL.D'Azevedo;pp. 183-193. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C.
15 1129
APPENDIX 1:

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/HISTORIAN
Bai "Tom" Tang, M.A.

Education
1988-1993 Graduate Program in Public History/Historic Preservation, UC Riverside. 1987 M.A., American History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 1982 B.A., History, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China. 2000 "Introduction to Section 106 Review," presented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the University ofNevada, Reno.
1994 "Assessing the Significance of Historic Archaeological Sites," presented by the Historic Preservation Program, University of Nevada, Reno.

Professional Experience
2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1993-2002 Project Historian/Architectural Historian, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-1997 Project Historian, Greenwood and Associates, Pacific Palisades, California. 1991-1993 Project Historian, Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside. 1990 Intern Researcher, California State Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. 1990-1992 Teaching Assistant, History of Modern World, UC Riverside. 1988-1993 Research Assistant, American Social History, UC Riverside. 1985-1988 Research Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1985-1986 Teaching Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1982-1985 Lecturer, History, Xi'an Foreign Languages Institute, Xi'an, China.

Honors and Awards
1988-1990 University ofCalifornia Graduate Fellowship, UC Riverside. 1985-1987 Yale University Fellowship, Yale University Graduate School. 1980, 1981 President's Honor List, Northwestern University, Xi'an, China.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Preliminary Analyses and Recommendations Regarding California's Cultural Resources Inventory System (with Special Reference to Condition 14 ofNPS 1990 Program Review Report). California State Office of Historic Preservation working paper, Sacramento, September 1990.

Numerous cultural resources management reports with the Archaeological Research Unit, Greenwood and Associates, and CRM TECH, since October 1991.

Membership
California Preservation Foundation.
16 APPENDIX1:

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/HISTORIAN
Bai "Tom" Tang,M.A.

Education
1988-1993 GraduateProgram inPublic History/Historic Preservation,UC Riverside. 1987 M.A., AmericanHistory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 1982 B.A.,History,NorthwesternUniversity, Xi'an, China. 2000 "Introduction to Section 106 Review," presentedby the Advisory Council onHistoric PreservationandtheUniversityofNevada,Reno.
1994 "AssessingtheSignificanceofHistoric ArchaeologicalSites,"presentedby the Historic PreservationProgram, University ofNevada, Reno.

ProfessionalExperience
2002- Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. 1993-2002 Project Historian/Architectural Historian, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. 1993-1997 Project Historian, Greenwood andAssociates,Pacific Palisades,California. 1991-1993 ProjectHistorian,ArchaeologicalResearchUnit,UC Riverside. 1990 InternResearcher,California StateOffice ofHistoric Preservation,Sacramento. 1990-1992 TeachingAssistant,History ofModernWorld,UC Riverside. 1988-1993 ResearchAssistant,AmericanSocialHistory,UC Riverside. 1985-1988 Research Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1985-1986 Teaching Assistant, Modern Chinese History, Yale University. 1982-1985 Lecturer, History, Xi'anForeign Languages Institute, Xi'an, China.

Honors and Awards
1988-1990 University of California GraduateFellowship,UC Riverside. 1985-1987 YaleUniversityFellowship, YaleUniversity GraduateSchool. 1980, 1981 President's Honor List,Northwestern University, Xi'an, China.

CulturalResources Management Reports
Preliminary Analyses andRecommendationsRegarding California's CulturalResourcesInventory System(with SpecialReference to Condition 14 ofNPS 1990 Program Review Report). California StateOffice ofHistoric Preservation workingpaper, Sacramento,September 1990.

Numerous culturalresourcesmanagementreportswith theArchaeologicalResearchUnit, Greenwood and Associates,and CRM TECH, sinceOctober 1991.

Membership
California PreservationFoundation.
16 1130
Education

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORARCHAEOLOGIST
Michael Hogan, Ph.D., RPA*
1991 Ph.D., Anthropology, University ofCalifornia, Riverside. 1981 B.S., Anthropology, University ofCalifornia, Riverside; with honors. 1980-1981 Education Abroad Program, Lima, Peru.
2002 Section 106—National Historic Preservation Act: Federal Law at the Local Level.

UCLA Extension Course #888.
2002 "Recognizing Historic Artifacts," workshop presented by Richard Norwood, Historical Archaeologist.
2002 "Wending Your Way through the Regulatory Maze," symposium presented by the Association of Environmental Professionals.
1992 "Southern California Ceramics Workshop," presented by Jerry Schaefer. 1992 "Historic Artifact Workshop," presented by Anne Duffield-Stoll.

Riverside, Chapman University, and San Bernardino Valley College. 1991-1992 Crew Chief, Archaeological Research Unit, U. C. Riverside. 1984-1998 Archaeological Technician, Field Director, and Project Director for various southern California cultural resources management firms.

Research Interests
Cultural Resource Management, Southern Califomian Archaeology, Settlement and Exchange Patterns, Specialization and Stratification, Culture Change, Native American Culture, Cultural Diversity.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Author and co-author of, contributor to, and principal investigator for numerous cultural resources management study reports since 1986.

Memberships
* Register of Professional Archaeologists.

Society for American Archaeology.

Society for California Archaeology.

Pacific Coast Archaeological Society.

Coachella Valley Archaeological Society.
17 Education
1991
1981
1980-1981
2002
2002
2002
1992
1992

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/ARCHAEOLOGIST
Michael Hogan,Ph.D., RPA*
Ph.D., Anthropology, University ofCalifornia, Riverside.

B.S., Anthropology,University of California, Riverside; withhonors.

Education AbroadProgram, Lima,Peru.

Section106—NationalHistoric PreservationAct: FederalLaw at theLocal Level.

UCLA Extension Course #888.
"RecognizingHistoric Artifacts," workshoppresentedbyRichardNorwood,Historical Archaeologist.
"Wending Your Way through the Regulatory Maze," symposiumpresentedby the Association ofEnvironmentalProfessionals.
"SouthernCalifornia CeramicsWorkshop,"presentedby JerrySchaefer. "Historic Artifact Workshop,"presentedby AnneDuffield-Stoll.

ProfessionalExperience
2002-
1999-2002
1996-1998
1992-1998
1992-1995
1993-1994
1991-1992
1984-1998
Principal Investigator, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California.

Project Archaeologist/FieldDirector, CRM TECH, Riverside.

Project Director andEthnographer,StatisticalResearch,Inc., Redlands.

AssistantResearchAnthropologist,University ofCalifornia, Riverside Project Director, Archaeological ResearchUnit,U. C. Riverside.

Adjunct Professor,RiversideCommunity College,Mt. SanJacintoCollege,U.C.

Riverside, ChapmanUniversity, andSanBernardinoValley College.

Crew Chief,ArchaeologicalResearchUnit, U. C. Riverside.

ArchaeologicalTechnician,FieldDirector,andProjectDirectorfor varioussouthern Californiaculturalresourcesmanagement firms.

Research Interests
Cultural ResourceManagement,SouthernCalifornian Archaeology, Settlement andExchangePatterns, Specialization and Stratification, Culture Change,Native AmericanCulture, CulturalDiversity.

CulturalResourcesManagement Reports
Author andco-authorof, contributorto, andprincipalinvestigatorfor numerousculturalresources management studyreports since 1986.

Memberships
* Register ofProfessionalArchaeologists.

Society for American Archaeology.

Society for California Archaeology.

Pacific CoastArchaeological Society.

CoachellaValley Archaeological Society.
17 1131
Education

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER
Mariam Dahdul, Ph.D.
2013 Ph.D., Anthropology, University ofCalifornia, Santa Barbara. 2002 M.A., Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton. 1993 B.A., Geography, California State University, Fullerton. 2003 "Ceramics Analysis," graduate seminar presented by Dr. Delaney-Rivera, California State University, Fullerton.
2002 "Section 106-National Historic Preservation Act: Federal Law at the Local Level," presented by UCLA Extension.
2002 "Historic Archaeology Workshop," presented by Richard H. Norwood, Base Archaeologist, Edwards Air Force Base.

Professional Experience
2000-2007 Project Archaeologist/Report Writer, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. • Preparing cultural resources management reports, maps, and site records; • Analyzing beads, ornaments, and shell;
• Conducting archaeological field surveys;
• Participating in various archaeological testing and mitigation programs.

Laboratory and Field Experience
2001 Archaeological field school under the direction of Dr. Brian Byrd. • Test excavations ofsites at the San Elijo Lagoon Reserve, including flotation of soil samples and sorting and cataloguing of artifacts.
2000 Archaeological field class under the direction of Dr. Claude Warren. • Excavated units at Soda Lake in the Mojave Desert and produced lake bottom stratigraphic profiles.
1999-2000 Archaeology Laboratory, California State University, Fullerton. • Assisted in the cataloguing of artifacts.
1999 Field survey course under the direction of Dr. Phyllisa Eisentraut. • Surveyed and mapped prehistoric site in the Mojave Desert.

Papers Presented
2002 "Shell Beads from the Coachella Valley," Sixth Annual Symposium ofthe Coachella Valley Archaeological Society.
2002 "Shell Beads from the Coachella Valley," Kelso Conference on the Archaeology of the California and Mojave Deserts.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Co-author of and contributor to numerous cultural resources management study reports since 2000. 18 PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER
MariamDahdul,Ph.D.

Education
2013 Ph.D., Anthropology,University of California, SantaBarbara. 2002 M.A., Anthropology, California StateUniversity,Fullerton. 1993 B.A., Geography, California StateUniversity, Fullerton. 2003 "CeramicsAnalysis," graduateseminarpresentedby Dr. Delaney-Rivera,California StateUniversity,Fullerton.
2002 "Section 106-National Historic Preservation Act: Federal Law at the Local Level," presentedby UCLA Extension.
2002 "Historic Archaeology Workshop," presentedby RichardH. Norwood,Base Archaeologist,Edwards Air Force Base.

ProfessionalExperience
2000-2007 ProjectArchaeologist/ReportWriter, CRM TECH,Riverside/Colton,California. e Preparingculturalresourcesmanagementreports,maps,andsiterecords; Analyzingbeads,ornaments,andshell;
Conducting archaeological field surveys;
Participating in various archaeological testing andmitigationprograms.

Laboratory andFieldExperience
2001 Archaeologicalfield schoolunderthedirectionofDr.BrianByrd. e Test excavations of sites at the SanElijo LagoonReserve,including flotation of soil samplesand sorting and cataloguing of artifacts.
2000 Archaeological field classunder the direction ofDr. Claude Warren. e Excavatedunitsat SodaLakein theMojaveDesertandproducedlakebottom stratigraphic profiles.
1999-2000 Archaeology Laboratory, California StateUniversity,Fullerton. e Assistedin the cataloguing of artifacts.
1999 Fieldsurvey courseunderthedirectionofDr.PhyllisaEisentraut. e Surveyedandmappedprehistoric site in theMojave Desert.

Papers Presented
2002 "ShellBeads from the Coachella Valley," Sixth Annual Symposium ofthe Coachella Valley ArchaeologicalSociety.
2002 "Shell Beads from the Coachella Valley," Kelso Conferenceon the Archaeology of the California andMojave Deserts.

CulturalResources Management Reports
Co-authorof and contributor to numerous culturalresourcesmanagement study reports since 2000. 18 1132
Education

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Daniel Ballester, B.A.
1998 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, San Bernardino. 1997 Archaeological Field School, University of Las Vegas and University ofCalifornia, Riverside.
1994 University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 2007 Certificate in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), California State University, San Bernardino.
2002 "Historic Archaeology Workshop," presented by Richard Norwood, Base Archaeologist, Edwards Air Force Base; presented at CRM TECH, Riverside, California.

Professional Experience
2002- Field Director, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California.

Report writing, site record preparation, and supervisory responsibilities over all aspects offieldwork and field crew.
1999-2002 Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside, California.

Survey, testing, data recovery, monitoring, and mapping. 1998-1999 Field Crew, K.E.A. Environmental, San Diego, California.

Two and a halfmonths of excavations on Topomai village site, Marine Corp Air Station, Camp Pendleton.
1998 Field Crew, A.S.M. Affiliates, Encinitas, California. • Two weeks of excavations on a site on Red Beach, Camp Pendleton, and two weeks ofsurvey in Camp Pendleton, Otay Mesa, and Encinitas.
1998 Field Crew, Archaeological Research Unit, University ofCalifornia, Riverside.

Two weeks ofsurvey in Anza Borrego Desert State Park and Eureka Valley, Death Valley National Park.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/NATIVE AMERICAN LIAISON
Nina Gallardo, B.A.

Education
2004 B.A., Anthropology/Law and Society, University ofCalifornia, Riverside.

Professional Experience
2004- Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. • Surveys, excavations, mapping, and records searches.

Honors and Awards
2000-2002 Dean's Honors List, University ofCalifornia, Riverside. 19 PROJECTARCHAEOLOGIST
DanielBallester,B.A.

Education
1998 B.A.,Anthropology,CaliforniaStateUniversity,SanBernardino. 1997 ArchaeologicalField School,University ofLas Vegas andUniversity ofCalifornia, Riverside.
1994 University ofPuerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. 2007 Certificate inGeographicInformation Systems(GIS), California StateUniversity, San Bernardino.
2002 "Historic ArchaeologyWorkshop,"presentedbyRichardNorwood,BaseArchaeologist, Edwards Air Force Base; presented at CRM TECH,Riverside, California.

ProfessionalExperience
2002- FieldDirector, CRM TECH, Riverside/Colton, California. » Report writing, siterecordpreparation,andsupervisoryresponsibilitiesover all aspectsof fieldwork and field crew.
1999-2002 Project Archaeologist, CRM TECH, Riverside, California. » Survey, testing, datarecovery, monitoring, andmapping. 1998-1999 Field Crew, K.E.A. Environmental, SanDiego, California. * Two andahalfmonths of excavationsonTopomai village site,Marine Corp Air Station,CampPendleton.
1998 Field Crew, A.S.M. Affiliates,Encinitas, California. * Two weeksof excavationson a site onRedBeach,CampPendleton,andtwo weeks of surveyinCampPendleton,OtayMesa,andEncinitas.
1998 Field Crew, Archaeological ResearchUnit, University of California, Riverside. * Two weeksof surveyin Anza Borrego Desert StatePark andEureka Valley, Death ValleyNationalPark.

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/NATIVE AMERICANLIAISON
Nina Gallardo,B.A.

Education
2004 B.A., Anthropology/Law andSociety,University ofCalifornia,Riverside.

ProfessionalExperience
2004- Project Archaeologist,CRM TECH,Riverside/Colton,California. « Surveys,excavations,mapping,andrecords searches.

Honors and Awards
2000-2002 Dean'sHonorsList,University ofCalifornia,Riverside. 19 1133
APPENDIX 2

CORRESPONDENCE WITH
NATIVE AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVES"
A total of 14 local Native American representatives were contacted; a sample letter is included in this report. 20 APPENDIX2

CORRESPONDENCE WITH
NATIVE AMERICANREPRESENTATIVES"
* A total of14 localNative Americanrepresentativeswerecontacted;a sampleletter is includedin this report. 20 1134

SACRED LANDS FILE & NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACTS LIST REQUEST

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
915 Capitol Mall, RM 364
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916)653-4082
(916) 657-5390-Fax
[email protected]
Project: Wilmot Street Properties (CRM TECH Contract No. 2796) County: Riverside
USGS Quadrangle Name: Sunnymead, CalifTownship 3 South Range 3 West SB BM; Sectionts) 14 Companv/Firm/Agencv: CRM TECH
Contact Person: Nina Gallardo
Street Address: 1016 E. Coolev Drive. Suite A/B
City: Colton. CA Zip: 92324
Phone: (909)824-6400 Fax: (909)824-6405
Email: [email protected]
Project Description: The primarv component of the project is to develop 15 acres into two residential developments in the City of Moreno Valley, California.

March 19, 2014

SACREDLANDSFILE & NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACTSLISTREQUEST

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
915 Capitol Mall,RM 364
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 653-4082
(916) 657-5390—Fax
[email protected]
Project: Wilmot StreetProperties (CRM TECH ContractNo. 2796) County:_Riverside
USGS Quadrangle Name:__Sunnymead,Calif.

Township_3 South Range _3West SB BM; Section(s)_14
Company/Firm/Agency:_CRM TECH
Contact Person: Nina Gallardo
Street Address: 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B
City:_Colton, CA Zip:_92324
Phone:_(909) 824-6400 Fax:_(909) 824-6405
Email:[email protected]
Project Description: The primary component of the project is to develop 15 acres into two residential developmentsin the City ofMoreno Valley,California March19,2014
1135

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
l550Harl)Of Soulftvard, Sulls 100
VW»8t SacamsfHc, CA 98691
(918) 373-3715
FftX (918) 373-5471 Wab Site www,nflhc.ca,Qgy.

D*_nahc@f»aeb«H.net
March 20, 2014
Ms. Nina Gallardo, RPA

CRM TECH
1016 E, Cooley Drive, Suit© A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Sent by FAX to: 909-824-6405
No, of Pages: 3
RE; Sacred Lands File Search and Native American Contacts list for the "Redlands boulevard Properties and Wilmot Street Properties Projects (CRM TECH #2796);" located in the City of Moreno Valley; Riverside County,California Dear Ms, Gallardo:

A record search of the NAHC Sacred Lands Inventory failed to indicate the presence of Native American traditional cultural places in the Project site(s) or 'areas of Potentla! effect1 (APE), submitted to this office. Note also that the absence of archaeological resources does not preclude theirexistence at the subsurface level.

In the 1985 Appellate Court decision (170 Cai App 3rt 604), the Court held that the NAHC has jurisdictionand special expertise, as a state agency, over affected Native American resources impacted by proposed projects, including archaeological places of religious significance to NativeAmericans, and to Native American burialsites.

When the project becomes public, please inform the Native American contacts as to the nature ofthe project (e.g. residential, renewable energy, infrastructure or other appropriate type). Attached is a listof Native American tribes, NativeAmerican individuals or organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in or near the proposed project area (APE). As part of the consultation process, the NAHC recommends that local government and project developers contact the tribal governments and native American individuals on the list in order to determine ifthe proposed action might impact any cultural places or sacred sites. Ifa response from those listed on the attachment is not received in two weeks of notification, the NAHC request that a follow-up telephone call be made to ensure the project Information has been received,
California Government Code Sections 65040.12(e) defines 'environmental justice' to provide "fair treatment of people...with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies." Also, Executive Order B-10-11 requires that state agencies "consult with Native American lami aBrniw"' Jrt iflMUMi -
bsooi Sree mpman Cm WY VYWY NaI igoo1
STAYEQF CALIFORNIA.

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
+550HarborBouloverd,Sulta100
WaatSagramanto,CA86691
{918)373-3715
Fax (918)473-5471
Wat She
Ds_nahie@pachailnet
March20,2014
Ms. NinaGallardo,RPA

CRM TECH
1018E. CooleyDrive,SuiteA/B
Colton,CA92324
Sent by FAXto: 909-824-6405
No. ofPages: 3
RE: SacredLandsFileSearchandNativeAmericanContactslist forthe“Redlands boulevard Properties and Wilmot Street Properties Projects (CRM TECH #27986);” locatedin theCity of MorenoValley;RiversideCounty,California Dear Ma. Gallardo:

A recordsearchaf theNAHCSacradLandsInventory falladto indicatesthe presenceof NativeAmericantraditionalculturalplacesin theProjectsite(s) or ‘areasof Potentialeffact'(APE), submittedto this office. Note alsothat the absenceof archaeologicalresources doesnotprecludetheirexistenceat thesubsurfacelevel.

Inthe1985AppellateCourtdecision(170CalApp3®604),theCourtheldthat theNAHChas jurisdictionandspacialexpertise,as a stats agency,over affectedNative Americanresourcesimpactedby proposedprojects,includingarchasologicalplacesof religious significancetoNativeAmericans,andto NativeAmericanburial sites.

CaliforniaGovernmentCodeSections85040.12(e)defines‘environmental justice’to provide“fairtreatmentof people...withrespect to the development, adoption, implementation,and enforcemantof environmental laws,regulations andpolicies.” Also, ExacutiveOrderB-10-11requires that state agencies "consultwith NativeAmerican 1136
tribes, their elected officials and other representatives oftribal governments in order to provide meaningful input into-.the development of legislation, regulations, rules and policies onmatter thatmay affect tribal communities."
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (916)373-3715,
Attachments
Ig002
mime mere Y ale WAY VRE UYOV nagnw @goo2
tribes,theirelectedofficialsandotherrepresentativesof tribalgovernmentsin orderto providemeaningfulinputinto... thedevelopmentof legislation,regulations,rules and policiesonmatterthatmay affacttribalcommunities.”
if youhaveany questionsorneed additionalinformation,pleasecontactmeat (818)373-3715.
cerely,
1137
b .*-», V.LV VW 4 yJ*JV\f
1^1003
Native American Contacts
Riverside County California
March 20, 2014
Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula . CA 92593
(951) 770-8100
pmacarro@pechanga-nsn.
gov
(951)506-9491 Fax
Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians
Joseph Hamilton, Chairman
P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza • CA 92539
admin @ramonatribe,com
(951)763-4105
(951) 763-4325 Fax
Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
John Marcus, Chairman
P.O. Box 391820 ' Cahuilla
Anza > CA 92539
(951)659-2700
(951) 659-2228 Fax
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
William Madrigai, Jr„Cultural Resources Manager
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning . CA 92220
(951) 201-1866 - cell
wmadrigal@morongo-nsn.
gov
(951) 572-6004 Fax
Cahuilla
Serrano
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Daniel McCarthy, M.S.., Director-CRM Dept
26569 Community Center. Drive Serrano
Highland . CA 92346
(909) 864-8933, Ext 3248
dmccarthy@sanmanuel-nsn.
gov
(909) 862-5152 Fax
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Robert Martin, Chairperson
12700 PumarraRroad
Banning . CA 92220
(951)849-8807
(951)755-5200
(951) 922-8146 Fax
Cahuilla
Serrano
Serrano Nation of Mission Indians
Goldie Walker, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 343 Serrano
Patton , CA 92369
(909) 528-9027 or
(909) 528-9032
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Luther Salgado, Chairperson
PO Box 391760 Cahuilla
Anza > CA 92539
[email protected]
760-763-5549
760-763-2631 - Tribal EPA
This list Is currant only»s ofth* date ofthis document
Distribution ofthis Hat do« not mllovo any poraort of the statutory responsibility as definod In Section 70SO.S of the Hoafih and Safety Code, Soction 6097.94 ofthoPublic Rwauiww Codo and Section5097.98 ofthe Public ResourcesCodo.

This list s only applicable for contacting locative Americans with r^ard to cultural resources for the proposed Redlands Boulevard Properties and Wilmot Strati Properties (CRM TECH #2796) located In the City of Moreno Valley; Rtv6fs.de County, California for which aSacred Lands File search and Native American Contacts list were requestsed. rm ima mI AY Adis VaY WN GUTY nanny igoos
Native AmericanContacts
RiversideCounty California
March 20, 2014
PechangaBandof MissionIndians
Paul Macarro, CulturalResourcesManager
P.O.Box1477 Luiseno
Temecula , CA 92593
(951) 770-8100
prmacarro@pechanga-nsn.
gav
(951) 506-9491 Fax
RamonaBand of CahuillaMissionIndians
Joseph Hamiiton, Chairman
P.O.Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza , CA 92539
[email protected]
(851) 763-4105
(951)763-4325Fax
Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians
JohnMarcus,Chairman
P.O. Box 321820 Cahuliila
Anza » CA 92539
(951) 658-2700
(951)659-2228Fax
MorongoBandof Mission Indians
WilliamMadrigal, Jr.,CulturalResourcesManager
12700 PumarraRoad Cahuilla
Banning , CA92220 Serrano
(951)201-1866- cell
wmadrigal@morongo-nsn.
gov
(951) 572-6004Fax
Thislist ls currant only 3s of the date of this document, - San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
DanlelMcCarthy, M.S..,Director-CRMDept.
26569 Community Center, Drive Serrano
Highland » CA 92346
(909) 864-8933,Ext 3248
dmeccarthy @sanmanuel-nsn.
gov
(909)862-5152Fax
Morongo Bandof MissionIndians
RobertMartin,Chairperson
12700 Pumarra Rroad Cahuilla
Banning » CA02220 Serrano
(951) 849-8807
(951)755-5200
(951) 922-8146Fax
Serrano Nation of Mission indians
Goldie Walker, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 343
Patton
Serrano
, CA 92369
oo) 528-9027or
909) 528-9032
CahuillaBandof indians
LutherSalgado,Chairperson
PO Box 391760
Anza v CA 92539
[email protected]
760-763-5549
760-763-2631- TribalEPA
Cahuilla
Distributionofthis lat does not relieve any person of the statutoryresponsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of theHealth andSafety Code, Section8057.94ofthaPublicResourcesCodeandSection5097.98of thePublicResourcesCode, Thia list &only applicable for contactinglocative Amaricans with regard to culturalresourcesfor thefires RediandsBoulevardPropertiesandWilmotStrestProperiies (CRMTECH#2798)locatedinthe otMoreno Valley;Riverside County,CatiforniaforwhichaSacredLandsFilesearchand NativeAmericanContactslist wererequestaed, 1138
Native American Contacts
Riverside County California
March 20, 2014
Pechanga Cultural Resources Department
Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst
P.O. Box 2183 Luiseno
Temecula . CA 92593
[email protected]
951-770-8104
(951) 694-0446-FAX
Ernest H, Siva
Morongo Band of Mission Indians Tribal Elder
9570 Mi as Canyon Road Serrano
Banning - CA 92220 Cahuilla
[email protected]
(951)849-4676

SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487 Luiseno
San Jacinto , CA 92581
[email protected]
(951)663-5279
(951) 654-5544, ext 4137
(951) 654-4198-FAX
1^1004
ThislistIs current only aa oftha data ofthin document
Dtstrlbution of this list do*, not roliow any person of tha statutory responsibility as dofinod in Saotton 7050.5 of U» Health and Sataty coda, Soctlon M9794 ofWo Public Raaourcaa Cods and SoctJon 5097.98 oftha PwWte Rosourcas Coda. cSwyTcSoSiJS. v»N?h "saaod Land. Fite saar* and Native Aawfcan Comacls list am wwattM. mesa mee WAY WUE GURY nanny
NativeAmerican Contacts
RiversideCounty California
March 20, 2014
PechangaCulturalResourcesDepartment
AnnaHoover, CulturalAnalyst
P.O, Box 2183 Luisefio
Temecula CA92593
ahoover @pechanga-nsn.gov
851-770-8104
(951) 694-0446-FAX
ErnestH, Siva
MorongoBand of MissionIndiansTribalEider
9570Mias CanyonRoad Serrano
Banning » CA92220 Cahuilla
[email protected]
(951)B49-4676

SOBOBABANDOF LUISENOINDIANS
JosephOntiveros,CulturalResourceDepartment
P.O. BOX 487 Luiseno
San Jacinto » CA 92581
jontiveros @sohoba-nsn.gov
(951) 663-5279
(951) 654-5544,ext 4137
(951) 654-4198-FAX
This list In current only as of the date of thix document.

Distributionof this list dossnotrelieveanypersonof thestatutory responsibility asdefinedInSection7050.5of theHealthandSafetyCode, Section6097.94of thePublicResourcesCodeandBaction5097.98ofthePublicResourcesCode.

Thiglist 5 only applicablefor contactinglocativa Amardeanswith regard ta culturalresources for the RedlandsBoulevardPropertiesandWilmotStreetProperties(CRAMTECH#2796)locatedinthe County,Californiaforwhicha SacredLandsFilssearchandNativeAmericanContactslistwererequestsed. good
posed
ity of MorenaVallay;Riverside
1139
March 26, 2014
John Gomez, Jr., Cultural Resource Coordinator
Ramona Band ofCahuilla Mission Indians
P.O. Box 391372
Anza, CA 92539
RE: Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street Properties
48 Acres in the City of Moreno Valley,
Riverside County, California
CRM TECH Contract #2796
Dear Mr. Gomez:

MultiVac Inc. is proposing to develop two separate projects in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The Redlands Boulevard Properties encompasses approximately 35 acres of vacant land on the northeast corner ofRedlands Boulevard and Cactus Avenue. The client is proposing to develop the Redlands Boulevard Properties into twomulti-family residential complexes and a commercial center. The Wilmot Street Properties encompasses approximately 13 acres of vacant land on the southeast corner of Wilmot Street and Brodiaea Avenue. The client is proposing to develop the WilmotProperties into twomulti-family residential complexes. The accompanying map, based on the USGS Sunnymead, Calif, 7.5' quadrangle, depictsthe location of the project areas in Sections 13 and 14, T3S R3W, SBBM. CRM TECH has been hired to conduct a cultural resource study, including the Native American scoping, for this project.

In a letter dated March 20, 2014, the Native American Heritage Commission reports that the sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources within the project areas, but recommends that local Native American groups be contacted for further information. Therefore, as part of the cultural resources study for this project, I am writing to request your input on potential Native American cultural resources in or near either ofthese two project areas.

According to records on file at the Eastern Information Center, located on the campus of the University of California, Riverside, there are no knownhistorical/archaeological siteswithinthe boundaries ofthe two project areas. Within the one-mile radius ofthe project areas, 40 prehistoric sites have been recorded, most ofthem bedrock milling features. The closest ofthese prehistoric sites, 33-002993, consists of a bedrock-milling feature located about 0.25 mile southeast of the eastern project area. Three historic sites have also beenrecorded within the one-mile radius of the project areas, consisting of a single-family residence, a public school, and a water conveyance system. A systematic field survey of theproperties on March 21, 2014, encountered no potential historical resources within or adjacent to the project areas. No boulders on bedrock outcrops are located on the properties.

March 26, 2014
John Gomez, Jr., Cultural ResourceCoordinator
RamonaBand of Cahuilla MissionIndians
P.O. Box 391372
Anza, CA 92539
RE: RedlandsBoulevardandWilmot StreetProperties
48AcresintheCity ofMorenoValley,
RiversideCounty,California
CRM TECH Contract #2796
Dear Mr. Gomez:

MultiVac Inc. is proposingto develop two separateprojects in the City ofMoreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The RedlandsBoulevardProperties encompasses approximately 35 acres of vacantland on the northeast corner ofRedlandsBoulevard and Cactus Avenue. The client is proposing to develop the RedlandsBoulevardProperties into two multi-family residential complexes andacommercialcenter. TheWilmot StreetPropertiesencompassesapproximately13 acresof vacantland on the southeast corner ofWilmot Street andBrodiaea Avenue. The client is proposing to developtheWilmot Propertiesinto twomulti-family residentialcomplexes. Theaccompanying map,basedontheUSGSSunnymead,Calif., 7.5'quadrangle,depictsthelocationof theproject areasin Sections 13 and 14, T3S R3W, SBBM. CRM TECHhasbeenhired to conduct a cultural resource study, including theNative American scoping, for this project.

Ina letter datedMarch20,2014,theNativeAmericanHeritageCommissionreportsthatthesacred landsrecordsearchidentifiednoNativeAmericanculturalresourceswithin theproject areas,but recommendsthat localNative Americangroupsbe contacted for further information. Therefore, as part oftheculturalresources study for thisproject,I amwriting to request yourinput onpotential Native Americanculturalresourcesin ornear either ofthesetwoproject areas.

Accordingto recordson file at theEasternInformationCenter,locatedon thecampusof the University of California,Riverside,thereareno knownhistorical/archaeological siteswithin the boundaries of the two project areas. Within the one-mile radius of theproject areas,40 prehistoric siteshave beenrecorded,most of thembedrock milling features. The closestof theseprehistoric sites, 33-002993, consistsof abedrock-milling feature located about 0.25 mile southeast of the easternproject area. Threehistoric siteshavealsobeenrecordedwithin theone-mileradiusofthe project areas, consisting of a single-family residence, apublic school, and a water conveyance system. A systematic field survey of theproperties onMarch 21, 2014, encounteredno potential historicalresourceswithinor adjacent to theprojectareas. No bouldersonbedrockoutcropsare locatedon theproperties.

Pleaserespondat your earliest convenienceif youhaveany specificknowledgeof sacred/religious sitesor other sitesofNative Americantraditionalculturalvaluewithinor neartheproject areas that needto be takeninto considerationaspart of the culturalresourcesinvestigation. Any information or concernsmay be forwarded to CRM TECHby telephone,e-mail, facsimile, or standardmail. 1140
Requests for documentation or information we cannot provide will be forwarded to our client and/or the lead agency, which is the City of Moreno Valley for CEQA-compliance purposes. We would also like to clarify that CRM TECH, as the cultural resources consultant for the project, is not the appropriate entity to initiate government-to-government consultations. Thank you for the time and effort in addressing this important matter.

Respectfully,
Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
Email: [email protected]
End.: project area map
From: Daniel McCarthy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:26 PM
To: Nina ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street Properties (CRMTECH #2796 Nina,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We are not aware of any cultural resources located on the subject property. Given the nature and location ofthe project we have no concerns, //daniel Daniel McCarthy, MS, RPA
Director
Cultural Resources Management Department
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA 92346
Office: 909 864-8933 x 3248
Cell: 909 838-4175
[email protected]
Requests for documentationorinformationwecannotprovidewillbe forwardedto our client and/or theleadagency,whichis theCity ofMorenoValley for CEQA-compliancepurposes. We would also like to clarify that CRM TECH, as the cultural resources consultant for the project, is not the appropriateentity to initiate government-to-government consultations. Thank you for thetime and effort in addressingthisimportantmatter.

Respectfully,
Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
Email:[email protected]
Encl.:project areamap
From: Daniel McCarthy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:26 PM
To: Nina ([email protected])
Subject: Re: RedlandsBoulevard and Wilmot StreetProperties (CRMTECH #2796 Nina,
Thank you for theopportunityto comment. Wearenot awareof anyculturalresourceslocatedon the subjectproperty. Given thenatureandlocationof theproject wehaveno concerns. //daniel Daniel McCarthy, MS,RPA
Director
Cultural ResourcesManagementDepartment
SanManuelBand ofMissionIndians
26569CommunityCenterDrive
Highland, CA 92346
Office: 909 864-8933 x 3248
Cell: 909 838-4175
[email protected]
1141
March 27, 2014
Attn: Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
1016 E. Cooley Drive, Ste. A/B
Colton, CA 92324
Re: Redlands Boulevard and Wilmot Street Properties, Riverside County In the City of Moreno Valley
CRM TECH #2796
OF LUjs.

EST. JUNE 19.1883
The Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians appreciates your observance ofTribal Cultural Resources and their preservation in your project. The information provided to us on said project has been assessed through our Cultural Resource Department, where it was concluded that although it is outside the existing reservation, the project area does fall within the bounds of our Tribal Traditional Use Areas. This project location is in close proximity to known sites, and is regarded as sensitive to the people of Soboba.

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians is requesting the following:

1. To initiate a consultation with the Project Developer and Land owner.

2. The transfer of information to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians regarding the progress ofthis project should be done as soon as new developments occur.

3. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians continues to act as a lead consulting tribal entity for this project.

4. Working in and around traditional use areas intensifies the possibility of encountering cultural resources during the construction/excavation phase. For this reason the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians requests that Native American Monitor(s) from the Soboba Band ofLuiseno Indians Cultural Resource Department to be present during any ground disturbing proceedings. Including future surveys and archaeological testing.

5. Request that prober procedures be taken and requests ofthe tribe be honored (Please see the attachment)
Sincerely
Joseph Ontiveros
Soboba Cultural Resource Department
P.O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA 92581
Phone (951) 654-5544 ext. 4137
Cell (951) 663-5279
jontiveros(a).soboba-nsn.gov
'olJKB^Wil
«iv APK (Jo /Oil
BY:
1 I
March27,2014
Attn: Nina Gallardo

CRM TECH
1016E. Cooley Drive, Ste.A/B
Colton, CA 92324 EST.JUNE19,1883
Re:RedlandsBoulevardandWilmot StreetProperties,Riverside County In the City ofMoreno Valley
CRM TECH #2796
TheSobobaBandof LuisefioIndiansappreciates yourobservanceofTribalCulturalResources andtheir preservation inyour project. The informationprovidedto us on saidproject hasbeen assessedthroughour CulturalResourceDepartment,whereit wasconcludedthatalthoughit is outsidetheexistingreservation,theproject areadoes fall withintheboundsof ourTribal TraditionalUseAreas. Thisproject locationis incloseproximity to knownsites,andis regarded as sensitiveto thepeopleofSoboba.

SobobaBandofLuiseiioIndiansis requestingthefollowing:

I. To initiate aconsultationwiththeProjectDeveloperandLandowner.

2. Thetransferofinformationto theSobobaBandofLuisefioIndiansregardingtheprogress of thisproject shouldbedoneas soonasnewdevelopmentsoccur.

3. SobobaBandofLuisefioIndians continuesto actasaleadconsultingtribal entity for this project.

4. Workinginandaroundtraditionaluseareasintensifies thepossibility of encountering culturalresourcesduringtheconstruction/excavationphase. ForthisreasontheSoboba BandofLuisefioIndiansrequeststhatNativeAmericanMonitor(s)fromtheSoboba BandofLuisefioIndiansCulturalResourceDepartment tobepresentduring anyground disturbingproceedings.Including futuresurveysandarchaeologicaltesting.

5. Requestthatproperproceduresbe takenandrequestsofthetribebehonored (Pleaseseetheagachment)
SobobaCulturalResourceDepartment
P.O.Box 487
SanJacinto,CA 92581
Phone (951) 654-5544 ext. 4137
Cell(951)663-5279
[email protected]
pi
5 APR 03 2014
1142 AAAS EEE] FERN PR.

The Developer should waive any and all claims to ownership ofNative American ceremonial and cultural artifacts that may be found on the Project site. Upon completion of authorized and mandatory archeological analysis, the Developer should return said artifacts to the Soboba Band within a reasonable time period agreed to by the Parties and not to exceed (30) days from the initial recovery ofthe items.

Treatment and Disposition of Remains.

A. The Soboba Band shall be allowed, under California Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (a), to (1) inspect the site ofthe discovery and (2) make determinations as to how the human remains and grave goods shall be treated and disposed ofwith appropriate dignity.

B. The Soboba Band, as MLD, shall complete its inspection within twentyfour (24) hours ofreceiving notification from either the Developer or the NAHC, as required by California Public Resources Code § 5097.98 (a). The Parties agree to discuss in good faith what constitutes "appropriate dignity" as that term is used in the applicable statutes.

D. All parties are aware that the Soboba Band may wish to rebury the human remains and associated ceremonial and cultural items (artifacts) on or near, the site oftheir discovery, in an area that shall not be subject to future subsurface disturbances. The Developer should accommodate on-site reburial in a location mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

These items, and other funerary remnants and their ashes are to be treated in the same manner as human bone fragments or bones that remain intact.

TheDevelopershouldwaiveanyandallclaimstoownershipofNativeAmericanceremonialand culturalartifactsthatmaybefoundontheProject site. Uponcompletionof authorizedand mandatoryarcheologicalanalysis,theDeveloper shouldreturnsaidartifacts to theSobobaBand withinareasonabletimeperiodagreedto by thePartiesandnot to exceed(30) days fromthe initialrecovery oftheitems. :

Treatment andDisposition ofRemains.

A. TheSobobaBandshallbeallowed,underCaliforniaPublicResources Code§ 5097.98(a),to (1)inspectthesiteofthediscoveryand(2) makedeterminations as tohow thehumanremainsandgravegoods shallbe treatedanddisposedofwith appropriatedignity.

B. TheSobobaBand,asMLD, shallcompleteitsinspectionwithintwetityfour(24)hoursofreceivingnotification from eithertheDeveloperor theNAHC,as... requiredby CaliforniaPublicResourcesCode§ 5097.98(a). ThePartiesagreeto discuss ingoodfaith whatconstitutes"appropriatedignity" asthattermis usedin theapplicable statutes.

C. Reburialofhumanremains shallbe accomplishedincompliancewith the CaliforniaPublicResourcesCode§ 5097.98(a) and(b). TheSobobaBand,astheMLD in consultation withtheDeveloper, shall make the finaldiscretionary determination regardingtheappropriatedispositionandtreatmentofhumanremains.

D. All parties are awarethat the SobobaBandmay wish to rebury the humanremainsandassociatedceremonialandculturalitems(artifacts)onornear,the siteoftheirdiscovery,inanareathat shallnotbe subject to futuresubsurface disturbances. TheDeveloper shouldaccommodateon-sitereburialinalocationmutually agreeduponby theParties.

E. Theterm "humanremains” encompassesmorethanhumanbones becausetheSobobaBand'straditionsperiodically necessitatedtheceremonialburningof humanremains. Gravegoodsarethoseartifactsassociatedwithanyhumanremains.

Theseitems, and other funerary remnants and theirashesare to be treatedinthe same mannerashumanbonefragmentsor bonesthatremainintact.
1143
Coordination with County Coroner's Office. The Lead Agencies and the Developer should immediately contact both theCoroner andthe Soboba Band in theevent that anyhuman remains are discovered duringimplementation of the Project. If the Coronerrecognizes the human remains to be those of a NativeAmerican, or has reason to believethat they are those of a Native American, theCoronershall ensure that notification is provided to the NAHC within twenty-four (24)hours of the determination, asrequired byCalifornia Health andSafety Code§ 7050.5 (c).

Non-Disclosure of Location Reburiais. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial ofNative American human remains or cultural artifacts shall not be disclosed and shall not be governedby public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner,parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code § 6254 (r).

Coordination with County Coroner’s Office. TheLeadAgenciesandtheDeveloper should immediatelycontactboththeCoronerandtheSobobaBandintheeventthat anyhumanremains arediscoveredduringimplementationoftheProject. If theCoronerrecognizes thehuman remainsto bethoseof aNative American,or hasreasontobelievethat theyarethoseof aNative American, the Coroner shall ensurethat notificationis provided to theNAHC within twenty-four (24)hoursofthedetermination,asrequiredby CaliforniaHealthandSafetyCode§ 7050.5(c).

Non-Disclosure ofLocationReburials. It is understoodby all parties thatunless otherwise requiredby law, thesiteofanyreburialofNativeAmericanhumanremainsor culturalartifacts shallnot be disclosedandshallnotbe governedby publicdisclosurerequirementsofthe CaliforniaPublicRecordsAct. TheCoroner,parties,andLeadAgencies,willbe askedto withholdpublic disclosureinformationrelatedto suchreburial,pursuantto thespecific exemptionset forthin CaliforniaGovernmentCode§ 6254(r).

Ceremonialitems anditemsof culturalpatrimonyreflect traditionalreligiousbeliefsandpractices of theSobobaBand. TheDeveloperagreesto returnallNative Americanceremonialitemsand itemsof culturalpatrimonythatmaybe foundontheproject siteto theSobobaBandfor appropriatetreatment. Inaddition,theSobobaBandrequests thereturnofall otherculturalitems (artifacts)thatarerecoveredduringthecourseof archaeologicalinvestigations. Where appropriateandagreeduponin advance,Developer’sarcheologistmay conduct analysesof certainartifact classesif requiredby CEQA,Section106ofNHPA, themitigationmeasuresor p conditionsofapprovalfor theProject. Thismay includebutis not limited or restrictedtointliide shell,bone,ceramic,stoneor otherartifacts.
1144
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-33-000419 CA-RIV-000419 Other - SBCM - 587;
Other - MR- 1
RI-00137, RI-00534,
RI-01843, RI-04014,
RI-04417, RI-04788,
RI-08235
Site Prehistoric AP02; AP04; AP05;
AP08
1963 (P. Chace & E. Shepard, San
Bernardino County Museum);
1963 (P. Chace & E. Shepard, San
Bernardino County Museum);
1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys);
1988 (Daniel McCarthy,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside);
1995 (Daniel McCarthy, Cultueral
Resource Facility, California State
University)
P-33-000420 CA-RIV-000420 Site Prehistoric, RI-00534, RI-01843 Historic
AH04; AP02; AP04 1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc.)
P-33-000421 CA-RIV-000421 Other - SBMC-585;
Other - Wilmot Site
RI-00534, RI-01843,
RI-04417, RI-04788,
RI-08235
Site Prehistoric AP04; AP06; AP08 1963 (Paul Chace & E. Shepard, San Bernardino County Museum);
1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc.);
1988 (Daniel F. McCarthy,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside.);
1995 (Daniel F. McCarthy, Cultural
resource Facility, California State
University)
P-33-002775 CA-RIV-002775 Other - UCR ARU #1089 Site Prehistoric AP04 1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU); RI-01763, RI-02876 1990 (Brook S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
P-33-002776 CA-RIV-002776 Other - TTM 19802;
Other - UCR ARU #1089
Site Prehistoric AP04 1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU); RI-01763, RI-02876 1990 (Brooke S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
P-33-002777 CA-RIV-002777 Other - TTM 19802;
Other - UCRARU #1089
RI-01763, RI-02876,
RI-10698
Site Prehistoric AP04 1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU);
1990 (Brooke S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
P-33-002953 CA-RIV-002953 Other - #4 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)

Page 1 of 2 ends

Resource List
Primary No. Trinomial Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports P-33-000419
P-33-000420
P-33-000421
P-33-002775
P-33-002776
P-33-002777
P-33-002953
CA-RIV-000419
CA-RIV-000420
CA-RIV-000421
CA-RIV-002775
CA-RIV-002776
CA-RIV-002777
CA-RIV-002953
Other - SBCM - 587;
Other - MR- 1
Other - SBMC-585;
Other - Wilmot Site
Other - UCR ARU #1089
Other - TTM 19802;
Other - UCR ARU #1089
Other - TTM 19802;
Other - UCRARU #1089
Other - #4
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Prehistoric
Prehistoric,
Historic
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
APO2;AP04; APO5;
APO8
AHO04;APO2;AP04
APO04;AP06; AP08
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
1963 (P. Chace & E. Shepard, San
Bernardino County Museum};
1963 (P. Chace & E. Shepard, San
Bernardino County Museum);
1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys);
1988 (Daniel McCarthy,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside);
1995 (Daniel McCarthy, Cultueral
Resource Facility, California State
University)
1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc.)
1963 (Paul Chace & E. Shepard,
San Bernardino County Museum);
1968 (M. O'Neil, UCR ARU);
1983 (Jackie Desautels, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc.);
1988 (Daniel F. McCarthy,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside.);
1995 (Daniel F. McCarthy, Cultural
resource Facility, California State
University)
1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU);
1990 (Brook S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU);
1990 (Brooke S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
1984 (Jean A. Salpas, UCR ARU);
1990 (Brooke S. Arkbush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, Riverside, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
RI-00137, RI-00534,
RI-01843, RI-04014,
RI-04417, RI-04788,
RI-08235
RI-00534, RI-01843
RI-00534, RI-01843,
RI-04417, RI-04788,
RI-08235
RI-01763, RI-02876
RI-01763, RI-02876
RI-01763, RI-02876,
RI-10698
RI-01843

Page 1 of 2 ends

1145
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-33-002956 CA-RIV-002956 Other - #7 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002993 CA-RIV-002993 Other - SRS C Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Survey, Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-003307 CA-RIV-003307 Other - SRS -782-1 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (K.J. Peter and L.A. Carbone, RI-04418 Scientific Resourse Surveys, Inc.,
Huntington Beach, CA.)
P-33-007278 Other - Moreno Elementary
School;
Other - Old Moreno School 88-33-
002;
Other - Ser. No. 33-2388-3-0;
OTIS Resource Number -
464909;
OHP Property Number - 062619
Building,
Structure
Historic HP02; HP15 1983 (Jim Warner, Riverside County
Historical Comm.);
1988 (Gerald A. Maloney,
Department of Parks);
1988 (Cynthia Howse, n/a)
P-33-011606 CA-RIV-006914 Other - LSA-KBH232-I-1 Site Prehistoric AP04 2002 (Riordan L. Goodwin, LSA Associates)
P-33-013109 Other - SRS G Building,
Structure,
Site
Historic AH16 1983 (R. Mason, Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc.)
P-33-015046 CA-RIV-008007 Other - NS11 Site Prehistoric AP04 2006 (Dice, Michael, Michael Brandman Associates)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Resource List
Primary No. Trinomial Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports P-33-002956 CA-RIV-002956 Other - #7 Site Prehistoric APO4 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002993 CA-RIV-002993 Other - SRS C Site Prehistoric APO4 1983 (Thomas Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Survey, Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-003307 CA-RIV-003307 Other - SRS -782-1 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (K.J. Peter and L.A. Carbone, RI-04418 Scientific Resourse Surveys, Inc.,
Huntington Beach, CA.)
P-33-007278 Other - Moreno Elementary Building, Historic HPO02; HP15 1983 (Jim Warner, Riverside County School; Structure Historical Comm.);
Other - Old Moreno School 88-33- 1988 (Gerald A. Maloney, 002; Department of Parks);
Other - Ser. No. 33-2388-3-0; 1988 (Cynthia Howse, n/a) OTIS Resource Number - 464909;
OHP Property Number - 062619
P-33-011606 CA-RIV-006914 Other - LSA-KBH232-I-1 Site Prehistoric APO4 2002 (Riordan L. Goodwin, LSA Associates)
P-33-013109 Other - SRS G Building, Historic AH16 1983 (R. Mason, Scientific Resource Structure, Surveys, Inc.)
Site
P-33-015046 CA-RIV-008007 Other - NS11 Site Prehistoric APO4 2006 (Dice, Michael, Michael Brandman Associates)

Page 2 of 2 ends

1146
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-33-000860 CA-RIV-000860 Other - 198-A RI-00203, RI-00534, RI-02171, RI-02876
Site Prehistoric AP02; AP04 1976 (D. Lipp & R. Weaver, UCR ARU);
1987 (Barry R. Neiditch,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside);
2006 (Archaeological Staff, Michael
Brandman Associates)
P-33-002952 CA-RIV-002952 Other - #3 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002953 CA-RIV-002953 Other - #4 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002954 CA-RIV-002954 Other - #5 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002955 CA-RIV-002955 Other - #6 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002957 CA-RIV-002957 Other - #8 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.);
1989 (S. Dies, R. Olson and K.

Owens, n/a)
P-33-002958 CA-RIV-002958 Other - #9 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.);
1989 (K. Owens, S. Dies and R.

Olson, n/a)
P-33-002959 CA-RIV-002959 Other - #10 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002960 CA-RIV-002960 Other - #11 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002961 CA-RIV-002961 Other - #12 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)

Page 1 of 4 ends

Resource List
Primary No. Trinomial Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports P-33-000860
P-33-002952
P-33-002953
P-33-002954
P-33-002955
P-33-002957
P-33-002958
P-33-002959
P-33-002960
P-33-002961
CA-RIV-000860
CA-RIV-002952
CA-RIV-002953
CA-RIV-002954
CA-RIV-002955
CA-RIV-002957
CA-RIV-002958
CA-RIV-002959
CA-RIV-002960
CA-RIV-002961
Other - 198-A
Other - #3
Other - #4
Other - #5
Other - #6
Other - #8
Other - #9
Other - #10
Other - #11
Other - #12
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
Prehistoric
APO2;APO4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
AP0O4
1976 (D. Lipp & R. Weaver, UCR
ARU);
1987 (Barry R. Neiditch,
Archaeological Research Unit, U C
Riverside);
2006 (Archaeological Staff, Michael
Brandman Associates)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.);
1989 (S. Dies, R. Olson and K.

Owens, n/a)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.);
1989 (K. Owens, S. Dies and R.

Olson, n/a)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific
Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
RI-00203, RI-00534,
RI-02171, RI-02876
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843
RI-01843

Page 1 of 4 ends

1147
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-33-002962 CA-RIV-002962 Other - #13 Site Prehistoric AP04 1984 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002963 CA-RIV-002963 Other - #14 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002964 CA-RIV-002964 Other - #15 Site Prehistoric AP04 1984 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002967 CA-RIV-002967 Other - #18 Site Prehistoric AP04 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-003238 CA-RIV-003238 Other - MV-16 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (D. Pinto, Archaeological RI-02171 Research Unit, UC Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003323 CA-RIV-003323 Other - Moreno Valley Trail #1 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (Michael Sampson, CA Dept of Parks and Recreation, Southern
Region Headquarters, San Diego,
CA.)
P-33-003343 CA-RIV-003343 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003344 CA-RIV-003344 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003345 CA-RIV-003345 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric AP04 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)

Page 2 of 4 ends

Resource List
Primary No. Trinomial Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports P-33-002962 CA-RIV-002962 Other - #13 Site Prehistoric APO4 1984 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002963 CA-RIV-002963 Other - #14 Site Prehistoric APO4 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002964 CA-RIV-002964 Other - #15 Site Prehistoric APO4 1984 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-002967 CA-RIV-002967 Other - #18 Site Prehistoric APO4 1983 (Thomas J. Banks, Scientific RI-01843 Resource Surveys, Inc., Huntington
Beach, CA.)
P-33-003238 CA-RIV-003238 Other - MV-16 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (D. Pinto, Archaeological RI-02171 Research Unit, UC Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003323 CA-RIV-003323 Other - Moreno Valley Trail #1 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (Michael Sampson, CA Dept of Parks and Recreation, Southern
Region Headquarters, San Diego,
CA.)
P-33-003343 CA-RIV-003343 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003344 CA-RIV-003344 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003345 CA-RIV-003345 Other - ARU #870 Site Prehistoric APO4 1987 (Barry R. Neiditch, RI-02171, RI-02876 Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)

Page 2 of 4 ends

1148
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-33-003346 CA-RIV-003346 Other - ARU #870;
Other - UCR ARU #1089
Site Prehistoric AP02; AP04 1987 (Daniel F. McCarthy and Barry RI-02171, RI-02876 R. Neiditch, Archaeological
Research Unit, UC Riverside, CA.);
1990 (Brooke S. Arkush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2006 (M. Dice, Michael Brandman
Associates, Irvine, CA.)
P-33-003347 CA-RIV-003347 Other - ARU #870;
Other - UCR ARU #1089
Site Prehistoric AP02; AP04 1987 (Daniel F. McCarthy and Barry RI-02171, RI-02876 R. Neiditch, Archaeological
Research Unit, UC Riverside, CA.);
1990 (Brooke S. Arkush,
Archaeological Research Unit, UC
Riverside, CA.);
2011 (Archaeological Staff, Michael
Brandman Associates)
P-33-015045 CA-RIV-008006 Other - NS#1 Site Prehistoric AP04 2006 (Dice, M., Michael Brandman Associates)
P-33-015148 Other - ASM2 Site Prehistoric AP04 2006 (Moslak, Ken, ASM Affiliates, Inc.);
2017 (H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B.

Bolger, M. Jorgensen and D. Faith,
Tierra Environmental Services)
P-33-015149 Other - ASM3 Site Prehistoric AP04 2006 (Moslak, Ken, ASM Affiliates, Inc.);
2017 (H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B.

Bolger, Jm. Jorgensen and D. Faith,
Tierra Environmental Services)
P-33-015150 Other - ASM4 Site Prehistoric AP04 2006 (Moslak, Ken, ASM Affiliates, Inc.);
2017 (H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B.

Bolger, M. Jorgensen and D. Faith,
Tierra Environmental Servicse)
P-33-019919 Other - CWA 63-6 Structure,
Site
Historic AH05; AH06 2010 (C. Cotterman, ECORP
Consulting)
P-33-028081 CA-RIV-012678 Other - TES-MV-001H Structure Historic AH11 2017 (H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, R.

Bolger, M. Jorgensen & D. Faith,
Tierra Environmental Services, Inc.)
P-33-028082 CA-RIV-012679 Other - TES-MV-002 Site Prehistoric AP14 2017 (H. Murphy, Tierra Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 3 of 4 ends

Moreno Valley City CouncilOctober 6, 2026

Moreno Valley City Council
October 6, 2026