Moreno Valley City Council
October 6, 2026

Formprepared by: J.Porter, S.Y. Maezumi
Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation, Bedrock Type and Condition MF A 1.10 x 0.90 x Height | 0.40 Decomposing granite
MF B 3.70 x 1.40 x Height | 0.70 “ MF C 2.70 x 1.60 x Height 1.00 “ MF D 2.90 x 1.80 x Height 1.45 “ MF E 2.70 x 1.90 x Height | 1.45 “ MF F 2.60 X 1.50 X height | 0.50 “ MFG 3.40 X 1.40 X height | 0.10 “ MFH 1.90 x 0.90 x Height | 0.10 “ MF | 1.33 x 0.82 x Height | 0.40 “ MF J 3.00 x 1.90 x Height 1.25 “ MFK 1.94 x 1.06 x Height | 0.24 “ MF L 1.90 x 1.40 x Height | 0.30 “ MFM 2.10 x 0.90 x Height | 0.50 “ MF N 2.90 x 1.25 x Height | 0.95 “ MF O 1.60 x 1.30 x Height | 0.30 “ MFP 2.20 x 1.60 x Height 1.00 “ MFQ 0.84 x 0.75 x Height | 0.25 “ MFR 0.85 x 0.60 x Height | 0.30 “ Feature # Milling Type | Length Width Depth Contents Remarks | Surface# (cm) (cm) (cm)
MF A | 1 Sm 13 13 4 Soil Fair condition
MF B 1 Co 15 15 10 - Highly decomposed
MF C 1 Sm 14 14 4 1.ocatodinsideSurface2
| MFC 2 Ms 67 31 - MF C 3 Ms 66 50 - - MF C 4 Ms 32 22 - MFC 5 Ms 58 30 - MFD 1 Sm 16 16 7 Highly decomposed MF E | Ms 32 18 - MF F 1 Co 16 16 15 Soil Verypoor condition MF G 1 Co 18 18 12 Soil
MF H 1 Co 19 19 12 Soil
MF | 1 Ms 58 28 ~ MF | 2 Ms 48 28
MF J 1 Ms 10 40 Fair good shape
MF J 2 Ms 24 23 “ MF K 1 Co 16.8 16 12 S/L. Nice condition MFK 2 Co 17.5 17.5 12.7 S/L “ MF 1, 1 Co 16 16 11 S Poor condition MFM 1 Ms 40 27
MF M 2 Ms 42 29
MFN 1 Ms 47 19 Decent condition
MF O } Sm 25 28 5 Soil
MF P 1 Bm 80 50 10 Decent condition
MF P 2 Ms 30 26
MF Q 1 | Ms 54 40
MF R 1 Sm 15 15 9
TypeKey: ContentsKey:

CO Conical mortar PM Possiblemortar S Filled with soil R Containsrock OM Ovalmortar MS Milling slick L Filled with leaves P Containspestle SM Saucermortar BM Basinmilling feature U Unexcavated M Containsmano Other Other:

DPR523L (1/95) "Required information
1398
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARTIFACT RECORD, update

Primary#
ff.RI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

Location Where Specimens are Curated: Michael Brandman Associates as of June 21, 2006 Number Type Condition Description Locational Bearing Collected (fom1, material, etc.) ( distance/bearing from datum) ? 1 Mano fragment Poss. FAR, Granite cobble Feature "N", STP #3, 26cm Yes cracked belowMGS
and angular
1 Grolllldstone fragment " " Feature 'T', STP #4, found at Yes surface
I Bone Btn11l animal Feature �'I'", STP#3, 50cm Yes
belowMGS
1 Small groundstone fragment Strations Prob. Granite cobble Feature "I", STP #!, l0-20cm Yes level below MOS in screen
I FAR fragmant Oxidized in ,. Feature "I", STP #4, 40-50cm Yes part level below MOS in screen.
5 TOTAL
DPR 623L (1/96) *Required infonnation
Stateof California— The ResourcesAgency | Primary #

DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION HRM
ARTIFACT RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

Location WhereSpecimensareCurated: MichaelBrandman Associatesasof June21,2006 Number Type Condition Description LocationalBearing Collected (forn,material,etc.) (distance/beanng from datum) ?
1 Mano fragment Poss. FAR, | Granitecobble Feature “N™, STP #3, 26cm| Yes cracked belowMGS
and angular
1 Groundstone fragment « Feature “J”, STP #4, found at | Yes surface
1 Bone Burnt animal Feature “I”, STP#3, 50cm | Yes
belowMGS
1 Smallgroundstonefragment Strations Prob.Granitecobble Feature “I”, STP #1, 10-28cm | Yes levelbelowMGSin screen
1 FAR fragmant Oxidized in | “ Feature “I”, STP #4, 40-50cm | Yes part levelbelowMGSin screen.
5 TOTAL
DPR §23L (1/98) *Required informatien
1399
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Camera format: Digital only
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

Lens size: __________ _
Film type and speed: Negative on file at: __________ _
Photographs and 1>hotograph list.

Mo. Day Time Exoosure Subject/Description View Toward Accession# 3 I 22 Feature A overview NE
" " " 16 Feature B overview SE
" " ,. 18 Feature C ovcrvie,, s
" " ., 26 Feature D and E overview N
" " .. 29 Feature F overview NW
" " " 31 Feature G overview E
" " " 33 Feature lf overview E
" " " 24 Feature I overview N
.. " ., 42 Feature J overview N
,. ., " 35 Feature Kand L overview N
38 Feature M overview N
40 Feature N overview N
50 Feature O overview
46 Feature P overview
48 Feature Q overview
44 Feat1rrc R overview
Overview of Feature A
Stateof California—The ResourcesAgency Primary #
DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

Camera format: Digital only Lens size:

Film type and speed: Negativeon file at:

Photographs and photograph list.

Mo. Day Time Exposure Subject/Description View Toward Accession# 3 1 22 FeatureA overview NE
“ « “ 16 FeatureB overview SE
« « « 18 Feature C overview S
“ « « 26 FeatureD andE overview N
“ “ “« 29 Feature F overview NW
“ «“ “ 31 FeatureG overview E
“ “ “ 33 FeatureH overview E
« « “ 24 Feature overview N
« “ « 42 Feature J overview N B
« «© « 35 FeatureK and1.overview N
38 Feature M overview N
40 Feature N overview N
50 Feature O overview
46 FeatureP overview
48 Feature Q overview
44 Feature R overview
Overview ofFeatureA
1400
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature B
Overview Feature C.

Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

Stateof California— The ResourcesAgency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRW
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, npdate Trinomial: CA-RIV-3345

OverviewFeatureB
OverviewFeatureC.
1401
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature D and E Overview Feature F
Primary#
HRJ#
Trinomlal: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:
‘StateofCalifornia— TheResnurcesAgency Primary #

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HR
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

Overview Feature DandE Overview Feature F
1402
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature G Overview Feature H
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

State of California— The ResourcesAgency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OFPARKS ANDRECREATION HRE#
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update | Trinomial: CA-RFV-3346

Overview Feature G Overview Feature H
1403
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview, Feature I with vision of Annageddon.

Overview Feature J
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

StateofCalifornia— TheResourcesAgency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OFPARKS ANDRECREATION HRE
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update Trinousial: CA-RIV-3346

Overview Feature J
1404
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature K and L
Overview Feature M
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RlV-3346
*Resource Name or#:
$uateofCalifornia— The ResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RI¥-3346

Overview Feature K and L
Overview Feature M
1405
State of California-The Resources Agenl")'

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update
Page U of 16
Overview Feature N Overview Feature 0
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-33-16
*Resource Name or#:

Smteof California— The ResourcesAgency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

Overview Feature N Overview Feature O
1406
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature P Overview Feature Q
HRI#
Primary#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

StateofCalifornia — TheResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKS ANDRECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update
Primary #
HRM
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

Overview FeatureP Overview Feature Q
*Resource Name or #
1407
r
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Overview Feature R
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RlV-3346
*Resource Name or#:

State of California— The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update
Primary #
HRM
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3346

PY
Overview Feature R
= Lak] a |
1408

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Archaeological Research Unit
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521 Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3346
Temporary Designation:

Page _l_ of _L

1. County: Riverside

2. USGS Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5' dated 1967 photorevised 1980

3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 486680 mE, 3752260 mN

4. Twp. 3 S.; Rng. 3 W.; SBBM, NE 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 13

5. Map Coordinates: 408 11111s 405 11111E 6. Elevation: 1700 ft.

7. Location: From the intersection of Theodore and Alessandro Blvd., drive approx .. 5 miles west on Alessandro, and then go south on dirt road, heading SE, for approx. 600 m. This road will wind towards a seasonal drainage where the site is situated.

8. Prehistoric: xxx Historic: Protohistoric:

9. Site Description: Habitation site with a developed midden deposit, milling slicks, and bedrock mortars.

10. 11.

12. 13.

14. 15.

16. 17.

18. 19.

20. 21.

22. 23.

25. 27.

29. 30.

31. 32.

33. 34.

35. 36.

Area: 105 m (N/S} x 40 m (E/W}; Method of Determination: Tape.

Depth: Deposit appears to be at least one m. deep in east portion of site.

Features: Various milling slicks/metates and bedrock mortars on 17 boulders.

Artifacts: Fire-fractured rock, sparse quartz debitage, and two manos.

Non-artifactual Constituents: None observed.

Date Recorded: July 10, 1990
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside Human Remains: None observed.

Site Integrity: Fair to good. Although various surface artifacts probably have been collected over the years, there is no indication that the subsurface deposit has been disturbed by illegal excavation.

Nearest Water: Seasonal drainage on site.

Vegetation Co11111unity (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub.

Vegetation (on site): Same.

Soil: Decomposing granitics.

Geology: Granitic.

Slope: 1-5%
Landowner and Address: Private.

24. 26.

28. Surrounding Soil: Same.

Landform: Foothills.

Exposure: Open.

Remarks: Much modern trash on and around the site, but the subsurface deposit should be intact. Only some mi nor di st rubances due to rodent burrowing.

References: None.

Name of Project: UCRARU #1089
Type of Investigation: Revaluation of ten sites.

Site Accession Number: N/A Curated at: N/A
Photos: N/A Taken by: N/A
Photo Accession#: N/A On File at: N/A

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Archaeological Research Unit
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521 Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3346
Temporary Designation:

Page _1 of 3

1. County: Riverside

2. USGS Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’ dated 1967 photorevised 1980

3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 486680 mE, 3752260 mN

4. Twp. 3 S.; Rng. 3 W.; SBBM, NE 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 13

5. Map Coordinates: 408 mmS 405 mmE 6. Elevation: 1700 ft.

7. Location: From the intersection of Theodore and Alessandro Blvd., drive approx. .5 miles west on Alessandro, and then go south on dirt road, heading SE, for approx. 600 m. This road will wind towards a seasonal drainage where the site is situated.

Prehistoric: xxx Historic: Protohistoric:

Site Description: Habitation site with a developed midden deposit, milling slicks, and bedrock mortars.
ow

10. Area: 105m (N/S) x 40 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Tape.

11. Depth: Deposit appears to be at least one m. deep in east portion of site.

12. Features: Various milling slicks/metates and bedrock mortars on 17 boulders.

13. Artifacts: Fire-fractured rock, sparse quartz debitage, and two manos.

14. Non-artifactual Constituents: None observed.

15. Date Recorded: July 10, 1990

16. Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush

17. Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, U C Riverside

18. Human Remains: None observed.

19. Site Integrity: Fair to good. Although various surface artifacts probably have been collected over the years, there is no indication that the subsurface deposit has been disturbed by illegal excavation.

20. Nearest Water: Seasonal drainage on site.

21. Vegetation Community (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub.

22. Vegetation (on site): Same.

23. Soil: Decomposing granitics. 24. Surrounding Soil: Same.

25. Geology: Granitic. 26. Landform: Foothills.

27. Slope: 1-5% 28. Exposure: Open.

29. Landowner and Address: Private.

30. Remarks: Much modern trash on and around the site, but the subsurface deposit should be intact. Only some minor distrubances due to rodent burrowing.

31. References: None.

32. Name of Project: UCRARU #1089

33. Type of Investigation: Revaluation of ten sites.

34. Site Accession Number: N/A Curated at: N/A

35. Photos: N/A Taken by: N/A

36. Photo Accession #: N/A On File at: N/A
1409
r
r
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3346
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5'
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Page_2_ of ___ 3____
\ \ \ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
\ \
\ \
\ \ ' '
' \ \ \ \ \
.,,,...
� '
,,,,.✓,,., ,,,..,,,,' - ..........
/ ,,,,.,,.,,,,,. ..,.,, .,, .,, ,,,. .,,. .,,. .,, .,,
.,,.
.,,.
oObcfJ
. )
o o0 �a
ob�S2--S?0 1 -- '
, \ / . \ · I
,' ')I
I • I·
I I:
'
\ 11/DDE N : 1 f
\ DEPO�IT I:
\ 1-
,
\ '\
\ �\ \ .
\ ' .
\ ' \ ' J ' I ', /
',-✓ \
CA-RIV- 33'16 0 s 'f "'·
I
sire /'Ml'
0 lJ/f.O�C1Clt: 1101t-r11�
@ NILL/N(;, sucK/ l'l�TAT�
r
N
■ /'fANfJ
A) 3.S X 13><1J Oi.

K} /I,< 15 J< It C/1 ,
IZ><lt x 17 t:"'1.

L} fJ</S-'<15 <'-".
11) ZZ. 7' �• CM
30 /< 30 CM.
w)
o)
P)
<?)
�}

1.0 X 1.6 CM •
It, ><35 Cl<.
6,: 15Kl5 l!l'i,
/6,c.3/ e;t_
Z.61453 t!li,
Z.3 II '>'8 Of.

ARCHAEOLOGICALSITE MAP Update
Permanent Trinomial:

Temp. Designation:

USGS Map:

Recorder:

CA-Riv-3346
Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’
Brooke S. Arkush
SIrE MAP
le) \ ¢ FLARE
I+ * 8 MANO
A) 3.8 XI xtI em, 8) ¢xs2x3 an. Cc) 7 xrpen/t en,
oSxpnr I/F cM,
26 8 3L en,
/2 x22 en.
tx 2° cA,
0 2xix sz em,
8) 20x 2¢ eA,
Pr) I13XI¥ X16 en. E €) 10x15 x15 cm. w
ne0 gb. |”J) 3skso cn. 204 LL) eM,
25 x &e Cm, 2ox 33 em,
K) ARIS X16 EM,
IZR/E X17 eM,
2) QRISRIS em.

CA-RIV- 3396 [4 5
©] BEDROCK MORTAR
NEI? RIT en,
0] NILLIvG sick) AETATE
wv) 20x26 CN,
16x35 cM.
0) gxISx(S em.

P) I1BX3 cM.

Q 20x53 em.

Rj 23 x 48 en.

QQ ®x Yeo
Prt N, : “) Sexe Pe
oe \:
\
. ]
3 ol
I;
/ [
I | ®
MODEN ]
DEPOSIT I.
l iQ) ®"
| . \
LJ a ®
\ [
\
\ / \
AI p; « s Te
1410

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
Page_3_ of _3_
BAY '
- . ---:-�,
i": (
...........__ �-·· .. : . . .

Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3346
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5'
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Wello
II
1674 �''i_ :::=:.== = === =":;:e-= 7 ==:::::=;:;:: ==:::, ;:;:== === ::;:t6aqj1 � �
z ct
� 0
� 0
0 0
� �
'·.
7 ------.. ....... ---...:At/:l .._�¼":t.,..e-...
-�·····• BLVD ,.······
. .. •····
.... ··
.
...• .
---�---,/560-
>­
--------:-.
-.=---"'"-w
..........
... ..J
...J
�
18 .... •
·
.
.
r--·· ..
-·
·
····· :;:,
........
......
~

ARCHAEOLOGICALSITE LOCATION MAP
Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3346
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5°
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
1411
r
Page _1_ of _L

1. Coun,y I River ide
e. UB18 111Md1 ny••d, 7.5', 1967

3. lffll £aordiN Iona 111 486680 IIE 3732260 11N
,._ TNp. 39 .... , ME 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 SW 114 NE 1/4 S.Ctton1 13 SBBN �. Nap C.ordi-t- .S ME 6. £1eva.tion, 1700'

7. Lacatlan1 Sit is located approximately 650 meters south of Alessandro a.
,.

10. u.

12. 13.

14. 11.

16. 17.

11. 19.
eo.
et.
ee.
ea
es.
rr, •
...
so.

31. 11.

33. 34.
315.

36. Blvd. along t", banks of and at the mouth of an intermittent wash.

Prehlstoric1 X Ht•tarlc1 Protohlstarlc1
&iw Deacript!1 C-UIP sit• with milling features
ArH1 70 • ( > x 20 11 CE/W>I ....... of DnwlliMUon1 Pacing Dllpth1 Midden pr ... nt, not determined
F•tur•• �licks and 11 mortar& on 18 boulders
Artifacts-a eral b•ult flues, one brown ware &herd
ND1t1rUf• C..tt._.., -- Rllcorder1
hu Race.,.., 16 Sltp_..r, 1987
D=•l F. fl!lcCarthyJ Barry R. Neiditch
Afflll&titm l!Nr_, Atchaeolo0ical Research Unit, UC Riverside ..._. .....,,.. None DlilMrved
ll:w lM11Flt\'i Site area is beino UHd for dwnpino and target practice --
Vllla!n•tlen
-�ntar■ittant ,.,r_ bed ruu throuvt, •ita.

Uy Cstte vlclnltyh Coutal Sage Scrub
.,..._�,.., hm Hah lritUe tsullh, bucktiJheat
Sella Kidclen �reant Sit. SurT--lftl Salli Grus, boulders ... le9Y1 6ranltic boulders 1ft. Lanilfare1 Alluvial plain llope-1 <8" li!I. &p...-a1 Open
.._.ksc
....._..,..,. ..... ,Private
Raf4ININ:NI -- - of Pra;s,:::ano Valley CuUurol Rnourcn Survey <ARU41B"70l Type of I-...t tioru 61.trf &ee ,urvey
Sita Acc:Nil!Oft I NIA Curfllld a'ta NIA
"-toa• None Taken by1
Phou Acc-im, 11 None On Fil• a'ta

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Page

1. 2.

3. 4.

S.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. 18.

19. 20. - al.
ae.

23. as.

27. 29.

30. 31.

32. 33.

34. 33.

36. Permanent Trinomial: CA-RIV-334é
1 of 3
County: Riverside
USES Buad: Sunnymead, 7.57, 19467
UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 4B66BO mE 3732260 mN
Twp. 35 Rng. 3W; NE 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section: 13 SBBM Map Coordinates: mmS mmE 6. Elevation: 17007
Location: Site is located approximately 630 meters south of Alessandro Blvd. along the banks of and at the mouth of an intermittent wash.

Prehistoric: X Historic: Protohistaoric:

Site Description: Camp site with milling features
Area: 70 m (N/S) x 20 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Pacing Depth: Midden present, not determined
Features: 20 slicks and 11 mortars on 18 boulders
Artifacts: Several basalt flakes, one brown ware sherd
Non-artifactual Constituents: -- Date Recorded: 16 September, 1987 Recorder: Daniel F. McCarthy; Barry R. Neiditch
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, U C Riverside Human Remains: None observed
Site Integrity: Site area is being used for dumping and target practice Nearest Water: Intermittant stream bed runs through site.

Vegetation Community {site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub Vegetation (on site): Brittle bush, buckwheat
Soil: Midden present 24. Surrounding Soil: Gruss; boulders Geology: Granitic boulders 2b. Landform: Alluvial plain Slope: <B% 28. Exposure: Open
Landownerand Address: Private
Remarks:

References: -- Name of Project: Moreno Valley Cultural Resources Survey (ARU#870) Type of Investigation: Surface survey
Site Accession NomberT—N/A Curated at: N/A
Photos: None Taken by:

Photo Accession #: None On File at:
1412

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP
Permanent Trinomial: RIV-3346
Page_2_ of _3_
Q. - 40 X' I 4 o c."" o..-rt.o.. v it� � \:i u1., sl:c.�s o.,,,J. .I./ sJ� .. 1-.s . w"-alt. �,.e,. ... bov� 11st.ol, b � ""'Or�C).Y"
C. - ,..., ... t,,...,.
d - ,., • .,.,, .....
e. - '"o.,..\ .. v
""'or-'\U.V fb.r1·.,sl,'t.l-.
,..e.+-.h
\
\
\
,3xi3x-, CM
1�1' ll. 11' 3 <""'
l$'�l1i ,1(,i.c ....
/fl'(i{, )( IO C ,_
1'4x1!1K3,sc ,...
�, I( / f r' 3 C. -
.:u )( 11 .. c-
\" �\ '0.
0,
�
(
r
r
t
s
\
,
,
I
\
\
\
USGS Map:

Recorder:

Sunnymea.d 7.5'
Daniel F. McCarthy
N not to scale
1 CJ b e.cl ue.I( outcrop
+ rnorfa,..r-(s)
• Me.�,de (s)
..-, "') �;cicleri { J ""
r -tl�ke.s
S shev-d
'
- .,. otk. ' >( ,.t. ....
,.._ t. .\ ._ i C
h- ... 1.-h.-+e..
j • ....,o..,.to.,..
j - ,.,n--\-u
k _ ,...o,..·h.v
rJ - 1"'01"*"""
() _ ,..�i,.te
p- movf,....-
Cf - �-' - � � ... .\ �
l.f5.r�5 c"'
,._fl(j/ ( .....

So IC 3o c. .....

S'S)( '-I s C .....
1'-y1",r/3C"'
1S I( U, J( 10 c"'
11,j)(ll.j 'I( /0 t"'
,s,,s,< ,:2. r ....
�!it;''"'
33y5Sc.,...
'30X'3:2 t .....
.:t3 y 30 I(',�
.z.4 V 1'-t c.-...
,, -, ,3 )( I, 5 c:"-
1s,c1sx,.s,,.,
:i. :I..)( l.'-\ , ......
3ox'-0'1( 7c: .-
36i<6' c,....,
Fo

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP
Permanent Trinomial: RIV-3346
USGS Map: Sunnymead 7.5’
Recorder: Daniel F. McCarthy
Page_2 of _3
a- Yo ¥xiHoem ovea with 2 bana Sirchs N not to scale
and 4 slichs. whde aces above ved. 1 0 bedrock outcrop
b~nmortar (3X13 X6 tm R mortar (s)
C - mortar (AX12 XA 3 em k etatels)
d - mevier 1S41S x12 em
e- mover Ib ¥Xi16x 06m ro midden
5 ¢ £- mocker (L] HR : om “ «shiek 26
Ete aL yt” F Lakes
1) Sherd
g = voch | x 1.6 m metete 45 y 25cm
atx 3 tm
h- metate Sox 30 tm
SSx 4S tm
1=mortav 1Cyiprid em
J = morkar 1SKIe X 10 ¢™
k - mov¥av 4X1 X10 En
ISXISK 12 tm
medte 93 x 63 em
|= medate 33v ssc”
"Mm - meade
N- mortar qx idx hsm
o- medate 20 X $0 Ea
1Sx SX 6.5¢~
P- mov tar a con Ye Axx?
q- ede Joxeox 7 ¢™
r= malate 36 x66 ©
1413

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
Permanent Trinomial:

USGS Map:

Recorder:

Page_3_ of _3_
o· #
\J
111 � --------������.

RIV-3346
Sunnymea d 7.5,
Daniel F. McCarthy
7 �=�
1 �==y:=WW�ell �0 71 ----........ ..._et��e,I !:f�e
•• ......
----
1 6
0 .• --·····"''''
0 o..--·
·
.. . ,, ...• BLVD
,···110
--------:·
�· ···-···
.......
,sso----=
>­ ----w·
······--····
.o
....
z
�
;_ \�
/.
z
<(
en.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
Permanent Trinamial: RIV-3346
USGS Map: Sunnymead 7.5’
Recorder: Daniel F. McCarthy
p =
A ——— ee
mem
1414
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY
NRHP
RECORD, update
Status Code
Other Listings Review Code Reviewer
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
'rrinomial: CA-RIV-3347
Date

Pl. Other Identifier: APN #478-240-027
*P2. Location: � Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, CA. Date: 1978 T.3S; R.3W; SW¼ of the NE¼ of Section 13. S.B.B.M. c. Address: none City: Moreno Valley. Zip: none
d. UTM: 0486670mE/3932398mN (furthest northwest corner), and 0486694mE/375235 lmN (furthest southeast corner).

Zone 11. Note: Plots taken in field via Garvin Legacy GPS, NAO 1984. e. Other Locational Data: The site is located on and between and slight rise and shallow gully west of the high point of the tallest ridge at the foot of Mt. Russell. Elevation: 1720 feet ASL. *P3a. Description: This site consists of four granitic bedrock outcrops with mortars and milling slicks. One outcrop (Fea #1) is located at the northwest end near the top of a low ridge several hundred feet east ofRIV-3346. This outcrop has a single mortar. To the southeast is another bedrock outcrop (Fea #2) with two mortars. This feature may have been the one recorded by McCarthy in 1987. A third outcrop (Fea #3) exhibits three mortars, one of which was filled with soil and grass.

Inside the filled mortar was a pounding stone - a very unusual and rare occurance. Finally, a fourth bedrock outcrop (Fea #4) was located on the west side of a shallow gully below a high ridge east of the site that exhibits two small seeps. This feature held four milling slicks of various sizes. The topsoil between Fea #1 and #3 was dark gray in color, which ran from the slight ridgetop and dirt bike path on the western edge of the site to the features themselves. This soil may be a midden as one or two possible quartzite flakes were observed. Fea #4 is near a shallow gully and the soils therein are a very light tan in color. The light tan soil is the normal coloration for foothill locations. This site has not been tested for significance.

PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) . . . .. see Photo log and Sketch maps
RECE\VED \N AUG� 201'
E\C
*P3b. Resource Attributes:

AP4, AP2 .
*P4. Resources Present:
□Building Ostructure
□object �Site D
District □Element of
District Oother
PSb. Description of Photo:

None. See photo log for
complete views
*P6. Date Constructed/Age
and Sources: □Historic
�Prehistoric □Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown name
17780 Collins Ave
Sunny Isles, FL 33160
*P8. Recorded by:

Archaeological Staff
Michael Brandman Associates
621 E Carnegie Dr, Suite #100
San Bernardino, CA. 92408
*P9. Date Recorded:

July 29, 2011
*PIO. Survey Type: CEQA
level Phase 1 survey.
*Pll. Report Citation: Dice, M.H. etal (2011). Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Assessment of the Highlands Specific Plan, City of Moreno Valley, California. On-file, Michael Brandman Associates. * Attachments: □NONE �Location Map �Sketch Map □Continuation Sheets □Building, Structure, and Object Record �Archaeological Record □District Record OLinear Feature Record �Milling Station Record 0Rock Art Record 0Artifact Record �Photograph Record 0Other (List):

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary #33-03347 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION ~~ HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

P1. Other Identifier: APN #478-240-027
*P2, Location: [X] Not for Publication [] Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, CA. Date: 1978 T.3S; R.3W; SW¥%of theNEY ofSection 13. S.B.B.M. ¢. Address: none City: Moreno Valley. Zip: none
d. UTM: 0486670mE/3932398mN(furthestnorthwestcorner), and0486694mE/3752351mN (furthest southeastcorner).

Zone 11. Note: Plots takenin field viaGarvin LegacyGPS,NAD 1984. e. Other Locational Data: The site is locatedon andbetweenandslight rise andshallow gully westof thehighpoint of the tallestridge at the foot ofMt. Russell. Elevation: 1720 feet ASL. *P3a. Description: This site consists of four granitic bedrock outcropswith mortars andmilling slicks. One outcrop (Fea #1) is located at the northwest endnearthe top ofa low ridge severalhundredfeet east ofRIV-3346. This outcrop has a singlemortar. To the southeast is anotherbedrock outcrop(Fea#2) with two mortars. This featuremay havebeen the one recordedby McCarthy in 1987. A third outcrop(Fea#3) exhibits threemortars,oneofwhich was filled with soil andgrass.

Inside the filledmortar wasa pounding stone—a very unusualandrare occurance. Finally, a fourthbedrock outcrop (Fea #4) was located on the west sideofa shallow gully below a high ridge eastofthe sitethat exhibits two small seeps. This featureheld four milling slicks of various sizes. The topsoil betweenFea#1 and #3 was dark gray in color, which ran from the slightridgetop and dirt bike path on the westernedgeof the siteto the features themselves. This soil may be a midden as one or two possible quartzite flakes were observed. Fea#4 is near a shallowgully andthe soils thereinare a very light tan in color. The light tan soil is thenormal coloration for foothill locations. This site hasnot been tested for significance.

P5a. Photoor Drawing (Photorequiredforbuildings,structures,andobjects.) *P3b. ResourceAttributes:
.....seePhotolog andSketchmaps AP4, AP2.
*P4, ResourcesPresent:
[(JBuilding [JStructure
[Jobject [XSite []
District [_JElementof
District [JOther
P5b. Description of Photo:

None. See photo log for
complete views
*P6. Date Constructed/Age
andSources: [JHistoric
ECE ED IN Prehistoric [JBoth
R 2) *P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown name
nS 40 201 17780 Collins Ave
Sunny Isles, FL 33160
- *P8. Recorded by:

E C ArchaeologicalStaff
MichaelBrandman Associates
621E CarnegieDr, Suite #100
San Bernardino, CA. 92408
*P9, Date Recorded:

July 29, 2011
*P10. Survey Type: CEQA
level Phase 1 survey.
*P11. Report Citation: Dice, M.H. etal (2011). Phase I andPhaseII Cultural ResourcesAssessment of the Highlands SpecificPlan, City ofMoreno Valley, California. On-file, MichaelBrandman Associates. *Attachments: [JNONE [Location Map [X]SketchMap []Continuation Sheets [JBuilding, Structure,andObject Record [X]ArchaeologicalRecord [District Record [Linear FeatureRecord [Milling StationRecord [_JRockArt Record [Artifact Record [XJPhotographRecord [_]Other (List):

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
1415
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #33-03347 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# __________ _
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length 135m (SW-NE) x b. Width 60m (NW-SE).

Method of Measurement: □Paced □Taped □Visual estimate i2JOther: The original site was recorded using NAD 1927 and was visually estimated as to location. The distances between features was calculated using a GPS and GoogleEarth aerials.

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): i2JArtifacts i2JFeatures i2JSoil □Vegetation □Topography Ocut bank □Animal burrow □Excavation □Property boundary OOther (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: i2JHigh 0Low Explain: Phase 1 archaeological survey.

Limitations (Check any that apply): □Restricted access 0Paved/built over 0Site limits incompletely defined □Disturbances □Vegetation OOther (Explain):

A2. Depth: □None i2JUnknown Method of Determination:
* A3. Human Remains: □Present i2JAbsent □Possible □Unknown (Explain): None seen during survey. * A4. Features: (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list assoc. cultural constituents, show location of each feature on sketch map.)
There are four bedrock outcrops with mortars and milling slicks. A grayish soil is located from the slight ridgetop downhill to the bedrock outcrops (slope to northeast). The soil encompasses feature 1, 2 and 3 but not 4. At least two quartzite fragments and possible flakes were observed. We note that there could be additional milling features on the ridge northwest of the site.
* AS. Cultural Constituents: (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.) The site exhibits some grayish soil, a few possible flakes and one pounding stone located inside a mortar, which we have rarely seen. The original site forms describe milling surfaces in places that, if replotted using NADI 927 and the original hand-estimate plots in the 1990 and 1987 site records, would place more features northwest of the sketched site boundary.

None were located therein, but it is possible more are buried beneath vegetation. *A6. Were Specimens Collected? i2JNo 0Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record/catalog & identify where artifacts are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: i2JGood 0Fair 0Poor (Describe disturbances.):
* A8. Nearest Water: (Type, distance, and direction.) The nearest permanent water is Mystic Lake several miles to the southeast. Two seeps are located on the hillside east of the site. These may have been a decent source of water prehistorically until the local watertable dropped during the farming period. * A9. Elevation: 1720 feet above sea level.

AIO. Environmental Setting: (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.) Toe of Mt. Russell, riverside sage scrub, hilly. Site overlooks the Moreno plain to the north. Excellent vantage point.

All. Historical lnformation: None.
*Al2. Age: i2JPrehistoric D Protohistoric D 1542-1769 D 1769-1848 D 1848-1880 D 1880-1914 D 1914- 1945 D Post 1945 D Undetermined (Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known).

Al3. Interpretations: (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations) The site probably represents a seasonal camp. The mortars were returned to year after year and the evidence suggests they left the pounding stones in place.

A14. Remarks: None.

AlS. References: (Documents, informants, maps, and other references).

Dice, M.H. eta) (2011 ). Phase I and Phase II Cultural Resources Assessment of the Highlands Specific Plan, City of Moreno Valley, California. On-file, Michael Brandman Associates.

Al6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.): See Photograph Continuation Page. Original Media/Negatives Kept at: None: digital. * Al 7. Form Prepared by: Michael Dice Date: July 29, 2011.

Affiliation and Address:

Michael Brandman Associates
621 E Carnegie Dr, Suite #100
San Bernardino, CA. 92408
DPR 523L (1/95) •Required information
StateofCalifornia—TheResourcesAgency Primary #33-03347
DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length 135m(SW-NE) x b, Width 60m(NW-SE).

Method of Measurement: [_JPaced [CIraped [visual estimate [X]Other: The original site was recorded usingNAD 1927 and was visually estimated as to location. The distancesbetween features was calculatedusing a GPSandGoogleEarth aerials.

Method ofDetermination (Check any that apply.): DJArtifacts [Features [Soil [Vegetation [JTopography [(JCutbank [JAnimal burrow [JExcavation [JPropertyboundary [JOther(Explain):

Reliability ofDetermination: [X]High [Low Explain: Phase1 archaeological survey.

Limitations (Checkany that apply): [Restricted access [_]Paved/builtover []Site limits incompletely defined ODisturbances [Vegetation [_JOther(Explain):

A2. Depth: [CINone X Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: [JPresent [XJAbsent []Possible [JUnknown(Explain):None seenduring survey. *Ad, Features: (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list assoc. cultural constituents, show location of each feature on sketchmap.) Therearefour bedrockoutcropswithmortarsandmilling slicks. A grayish soil is located from the slightridgetop downhill to thebedrock outcrops(slopeto northeast). Thesoil encompasses feature1, 2 and3 but not 4. At leasttwo quartzite fragmentsandpossibleflakeswereobserved. Wenotethattherecouldbeadditionalmillingfeaturesontheridgenorthwestof thesite.
*AS. Cultural Constituents: (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts,culturalresidues,etc., not associated with features.) The site exhibits some grayish soil, a few possible flakes and one pounding stonelocatedinsidea mortar, which we have rarely seen. The original site forms describemilling surfacesin places that,if replotted usingNAD1927 andthe original hand-estimateplots in the 1990 and 1987 siterecords,would placemore featuresnorthwestof the sketched site boundary.

None were locatedtherein,but it is possiblemore areburied beneath vegetation. *A6. Were Specimens Collected? XINo [_lYes (If yes, attach Artifact Record/catalog & identify where artifacts are curated.)
*A7. SiteCondition: [XJGood [Fair [JPoor (Describedisturbances.):
*A8. Nearest Water: (Type, distance, and direction.) The nearest permanent water is Mystic Lake several miles to the southeast. Two seeps are located on the hillside east of the site. These may have been a decent source of water prehistoricallyuntil thelocal watertabledroppedduringthe farmingperiod. *A9, Elevation: 1720 feet abovesealevel.

A10. Environmental Setting: (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.) Toe of Mt. Russell, riverside sage scrub, hilly. Site overlooks the Moreno plain to the north. Excellent vantagepoint.

All. Historical Information: None.
*A12, Age: [XPrehistoric [] Protohistoric [] 1542-1769 [] 1769-1848 [] 1848-1880 [] 1880-1914 [] 1914- 1945 [] Post 1945 [] Undetermined (Describeposition in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known).

Al13. Interpretations: (Discuss datapotential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations) The site probably represents a seasonal camp. The mortars were returned to year after year and the evidence suggests they left the pounding stones in place.

Al4, Remarks: None.

Al5. References: (Documents, informants, maps, and other references).

Dice, M.H. etal(2011). PhaseI andPhaseIl Cultural ResourcesAssessment oftheHighlandsSpecificPlan, City ofMoreno Valley, California. On-file, Michael BrandmanAssociates.

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.): See PhotographContinuationPage. Original Media/NegativesKept at:None: digital. *Al17. Form Prepared by: MichaelDice Date: July 29,2011.

Affiliation and Address:

Michael Brandman Associates
621 E CarnegieDr, Suite #100
San Bernardino, CA. 92408
DPR 523L(1/95) ‘Required information
1416
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
LOCATION MAP, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

Sunnymead, CA, 7.5' topographic map
l- um Fm 9 me 1000 MITTRS
Printed from TOPO! 02001 National Geographic Holdings (www.topo.com) Note: map to scale. Site boundary shown in black.

DPR 523L (1/95)
a o
,11aO ,,
'1 ,, ,, I I l
I
I
I I I
I I
l
I I I
*Required information
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
LOCATION MAP, update
State of California—The ResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
¢

*Required information
100METERS =
2 2) f
g 7 ” 3 ol
X 17 ¢ fs - ee AYsok p
ii 22a Panett’ Gan SER nh
] 1000FEET Q
Printed from TOPO! ©200! NationalGeographic Holdings (www.topo.com) sunnymead, CA, 7.5' topographic map
Note: mapto scale. Siteboundary shownin black.

DPR 523L(1/95)
1417
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP, update

Map prepared by: M. Dice
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
*Resource Name or#:

Date: August 1, 2011
Plan view of site boundary atop GoogleEarth image. "334 7 SE" is Feature 4 and "334 7 NW" is Feature I. Others as noted.

Scale is 1"=20 meters.

North is up.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
©
State of California—The ResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION
SKETCH MAP, update
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

Map preparedby: M. Dice
magery Date 11/16;2009 1996 11S 486682 14 mE 375237535 m N elev 533m seep A » *Resource Name or #:

Date: August 1, 2011
Eye ait
Plan view of site boundary atopGoogleEarthimage. “3347 SE”is Feature 4 and“3347 NW” is Feature 1. Others asnoted.

Scale is 1”=20 meters.

North is up.

DPR 523L (1/95)
648 m
*Required information
1418
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Feature #I single mortar.

Feature 2, two mortars.

DPR 523L (1/95)
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
*Resource Name or#:
*Required information
A Stateof California— The ResourcesAgency Primary #33-03347 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
Page S of 7 *Resource Name or #:

Feature2, two mortars.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
1419
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update

Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RJV-3347
*Resource Name or#:

Feature 3, three mortars (saucer and conical) one with a pounding stone inside that was exposed to view during measurement of depth.

View to the north of Feature 4, a bedrock outcrop exhibiting four milling slicks.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
State of California—The ResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSAND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, update
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

View to the north of Feature 4, a bedrock outcrop exhibiting four milling slicks.

DPR 523L(1/95)
*Resource Name or #:
*Required information
1420
State of California -The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
MILLING STATION RECORD, update

Form prepared by: M. Dice
Feature
Fea 1
Fea2
Fea 3
Fea4
Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation

1.54 x 1.00 x Height 0.50

2.14 x 1.50 x Height 0.50

1.22 x 0.90 x Height 0.20

2.60 x 3.00 x Height 1.00
Feature# Milling Type Length Width Depth
Surface# (cm) (cm) (cm)
Fea 1 I Co 15 dia II
Fea2 I Co 20 dia. 6
Fea2 2 Co 17 dia. II
Fea3 I Co 18 dia. 12
Fea3 2 Sm 16 dia. 5
Fea3 3 Sm 12 dia. 3
Fea4 I Ms 14 18 >3mm
Fea 4 2 Ms 33 20 >3mm
Fea4 3 Ms 16 20 >3mm
Fea4 4 Ms 23 20 >3mm
Type Key:

Co Conical mortar Pm Possible mortar
Om Oval mortar Ms Milling slick
Sm Saucer mortar Bm Basin milling feature
Other:

DPR 523L (1/95)
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
*Resource Name or#:

Bedrock Type and Condition
Medium granite, eroded, ancient bum likely
Contents Remarks
none
none
none
s This mortar held a pounding stone of granite
that measured 10cm long by 5.5cm wide by
3cm deep
none
none
none N slick
none NW slick
none SW slick
none S slick
Contents Key:
s Filled with soil R Contains rock
L Filled with leaves p Contains pestle
u Unexcavated M Contains mano
Other:
*Required information
&
State of California — The ResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION
MILLING STATION RECORD, update
Primary #33-03347
HRI#
Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

Form prepared by: M.Dice
*Resource Name or #:

Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation Bedrock Type and Condition Fea | 1.54 x 1.00 x Height 0.50 Medium granite, eroded, ancientburn likely Fea2 2.14 x 1.50 x Height 0.50 “ Fea 3 1.22 x 0.90 x Height 0.20 “ Fea4 2.60 x 3.00 x Height 1.00 “ Feature # Milling Type | Length Width Depth Contents Remarks Surface # (cm) (cm) (em)
Fea | 1 Co 15 dia 11 none Fea 2 1 Co 20 dia. 6 none Fea2 2 Co 17dia. 11 none Fea 3 1 Co 18dia. 12 S This mortar held apounding stoneof granite that measured 10cmlongby 5.5cm wide by
3cm deep
Fea3 2 Sm 16dia. 5 none Fea3 3 Sm 12dia. 3 none
Fea 4 1 Ms 14 18 >3mm none N slick
Fea 4 2 Ms 33 20 >3mm none NW slick
Fea 4 3 | Ms 16 20 >3mm none SW slick
Fea 4 4 Ms 23 20 >3mm none S slick
Type Key: Contents Key:

Co Conical mortar Pm Possiblemortar S Filled with soil R Containsrock Om Ovalmortar Ms Milling slick L Filled with leaves P Containspestle Sm Saucermortar Bm Basin milling feature U Unexcavated M Containsmano Other: Other:

DPR 5231.(1/95) *Required information
1421
-
-
-

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Archaeological Research Unit
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521 Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temporary Designation:

Page _1_ of --1_

1. County: Riverside

2. USGS Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5' dated 1967 photorevised 1980

3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 486640 mE, 3752200 mN

4. Twp. 3 S.; Rng. 3 W.; SBBM, SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 13

5. Map Coordinates: 408 mmS 407 ilunE 6. Elevation: 1690 ft.

7. Location: From the intersection of Theodore and Alessandro Blvd., drive approx .. 5 miles west on Alessandro, and then go south on dirt road, heading SE, for approx. 620 m. This road will wind towards a seasonal drainage, drive across the drainage, and stop at the top of the ridge. The milling feature is located on the east side of the ridge.

8. Prehistoric: xxx Historic: Protohistoric:

9. Site Description: A single milling slick on one granitic boulder.

10. 11.

12. 13.

14. 15.

16. 17.

18. 19.

20. 21.

22. 23.

25. 27.

29. 30.

31. 32.

33. 34.

35. 36.

Area: 2.5 m (N/S) x 3.5 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Tape.

Depth: Surface.

Features: One milling slick.

Artifacts: None observed.

Non-artifactual Constituents: None observed.

Date Recorded: July 10, 1990
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside Human Remains: None observed.

Site Integrity: Fair.

Nearest Water: Seasonal drainage located immediately east.

Vegetation Community (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub.

Vegetation (on site): Same.

Soil: Decomposing granitics.

Geology: Granitic.

Slope: 1-5%
Landowner and Address: Private.

24. Surrounding Soil: Same.

26. Landform: Foothills.

28. Exposure: Open.

Remarks: Much modern trash around the site.

References: None.

Name of Project: UCRARU #1089
Type of Investigation: Reevaluation
Site Accession Number: N/A
Photos: N/A
Photo Accession#: N/A
of ten sites.

Curated at: N/A
Taken by: N/A
On File at: N/A

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Archaeological Research Unit
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521 Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temporary Designation:

Page _1 of _3

1. County: Riverside

2. USGS Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5° dated 1967 photorevised 1980

3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 486640 mE, 3752200 mN

4. Twp. 3 S.; Rng. 3 W.; SBBM, SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 13

5. Map Coordinates: 408 mmS 407 mmE 6. Elevation: 1690 ft.

7. Location: From the intersection of Theodore and Alessandro Blvd., drive approx. .5 miles west on Alessandro, and then go south on dirt road, heading SE, for approx. 620 m. This road will wind towards a seasonal drainage, drive across the drainage, and stop at the top of the ridge. The milling feature is located on the east side of the ridge.

Prehistoric: xxx Historic: Protohistoric:

Site Description: A single milling slick on one granitic boulder.

Area: 2.5 m (N/S) x 3.5 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Tape.

Depth: Surface.

Features: One milling slick.

Artifacts: None observed.

Non-artifactual Constituents: None observed.

Date Recorded: July 10, 1990
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, U C Riverside Human Remains: None observed.

Site Integrity: Fair.

Nearest Water: Seasonal drainage located immediately east.

Vegetation Community (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub.

Vegetation (on site): Same.

Soil: Decomposing granitics. 24, Surrounding Soil: Same.

Geology: Granitic. 26. Landform: Foothills.

Slope: 1-5% 28. Exposure: Open.

Landowner and Address: Private.

Remarks: Much modern trash around the site.

References: None.

Name of Project: UCRARU #1089
Type of Investigation: Reevaluation of ten sites.

Site Accession Number: N/A Curated at: N/A
Photos: N/A Taken by: N/A
Photo Accession #: N/A On File at: N/A
1422

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP
Page_2_ of 3
gt
-
Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5'
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
51 TE MAP1 CA-£IV-33't 7
0 Z.5 SM.

I
A} /1/i.tltV6 Sl/C,t I
Z'-' � 3S t!.1'1.

N
Oo 0 C) l
\
\
\
- ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
Page_ 2 of __3
SITE MAP, CA-@iv-3347
°o 2.5 SM,
| 1 ]
A) MILLIvE Stick
20 XxX35 eM.
1423
-
-
-

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
Page_3_ of __,3�
====-----:-�\ BAY •
.,
"
\\
\\
......
. ••
.......
(
Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5'
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
---- -....._ -.:,:,,A ..._€".!:ft:t._e
7 16
0 0
·
·
··········
·······�-:-:-:,.-i.:.:.:. .. _
... }�-□---··········
BL V
D
······· ·
·····
····· ·-ao
,,,.---.. ___ ,sso--=
18 >-
_____ ........
w
..... .J ..
__J
<(
>

ARCHAEOLOGICALSITE LOCATION MAP
Update
Permanent Trinomial: CA-Riv-3347
Temp. Designation:

USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’
Recorder: Brooke S. Arkush
1424
•
-
•

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Permanent Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
Page _1_ of 3 >

1. County: Riverside

2. USGS Quad: Sunnymead, 7.5', 1967

3. UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 486640 mE 3752200 mN

4. Twp. 3S, Rng. 3W, NW 1/4 NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section: 13 SBBM

5. Map Coordinates: mmS mmE 6. Elevation: 1690'

7. Location: Site is on single boulder that is part of a larger granitic outcrop located on the western side of a small gully just below a small ridge

8. 9.

10. 11.

12. 13.

14. 15.

16. 17.

18. 19.

20. 21.

22. 23.

25. 27.

29. 30.

31. 32.

33. 34.

35. 36.

Prehistoric: X Historic: Protohistoric:

Site Description: Single granitic boulder with milling features.

Area: 2.5 m (N/S) x 3.5 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Pacing Depth: Surface
Features: Two milling slicks.

Artifacts: None observed
Non-artifactual Constituents: -­
Date Recorded: 16 September, 1987
Recorder(s): Daniel F. McCarthy; Barry R. Neiditch
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, UC Riverside Human Remains: None observed
Site Integrity: Site area is being used for dumping and target shooters Nearest Water: Site is situated along intermittent water course Vegetation Community (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub, buckwheat Vegetation <on site): Same
Soil: Bedrock
Geology: Granitic boulders
Slope: <20¼
Landowner and Address: Private
Remarks: --
References: --

24. 26.

28. Surrounding Soil: Grus
Landform: Hillside
Exposure: Open
Name of Project: Moreno Valley Cultural Resources Survey (ARU#870l Type of Investigation: Surface survey
Site Accession Number: NIA
Photos: None
Photo Accession I: None
Curated at: NIA
Taken by:

On File at:
® ~ ARCHAEDOLOBICAL SITE RECORD
Permanent Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347

1. 2. 3.

4. 5S.

7. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14,

15. 16.

17. lL) 18.
) 19.

20. 1.

22. 23.

25. 27.

29. 30.

31. 32.
33,
34,

35. 36.

County: Riverside
USGS Quad: Sunnymead, 7.5%, 19467
UTM Coordinates: Zone 11: 4B6640 mE 3752200 aN
Twp. 3S, Rng. 3W, NW 1/4 NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section: 13 SBBM Map Coordinates: mmS mmE 6. Elevation: 1690’
Location: Site is on single boulder that is part of a larger granitic outcrop located on the western side of a small gully just below a small ridge
Prehistoric: X Historic: Protohistoric:

Site Description: Single granitic boulder with milling features.

Area: 2.5 m (N/S) x 3.5 m (E/W); Method of Determination: Pacing Depth: Surface
Features: Two milling slicks.

Artifacts: None observed
Non-artifactual Constituents: -- Date Recorded: 16 September, 1987 Recorder(s): Daniel F. McCarthy; Barry R. Neiditch
Affiliation and Address: Archaeological Research Unit, U C Riverside Human Remains: None observed
Site Integrity: Site area is being used for dumping and target shooters Nearest Water: Site is situated along intermittent water course Vegetation Community (site vicinity): Coastal Sage Scrub, buckwheat Vegetation (on site): Same
Soil: Bedrock 24. Surrounding Soil: Grus
Geology: Granitic boulders 26. Landform: Hillside
Slope: <20% 28. Exposure: Open
Landowner and Address: Private
Remarks: -- References: -- Name of Project: Moreno Valley Cultural Resources Survey (ARU#870) Type of Investigation: Surface survey
Site Accession Number: N/A Curated at: N/A
Photos: None Taken by:

Photo Accession #: None On File at:
1425

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP
•
Page _g_ of .1._
-
\
\
-
Permanent Trinomial:
@ .. (
I
USGS Map:

Recorder:
(
CA-RIV-3347
Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5'
Daniel F. McCarthy
"' no+ -\-0 S'tQ.\e
1 'c:, .. s -e of '-'i'll.s
Cu b ovld e.- w·,+�
i_ ,....,c.•h½-es
\
\

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAP
® Permanent Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’
Recorder: Daniel F. McCarthy

N not 4a Scale )
1 ~~ base of hills
[0 b ould ev wth
tes a mete
1426
-
-.. •·
-

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
Pagel of l
�IG16e
u·
AVEN L1 : ..

Permanent Trinomial:

USGS Map:

Recorder:

CA-RIV-3347
. 7 5' Sunnymead, Calif . .
. Danie l F Mc Car thy
7 /560 ··•··
>-
w
.
. ...J
...J
<( ..
.
>
0 tu
<(
·,-,
3753
55'
3752
375]
3750

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATION MAP
( Permanent Trinomial: CA-RIV-3347
USGS Map: Sunnymead, Calif. 7.5’
Recorder: Daniel F. McCarthy

ee”

REDLANC
1/600 3753
=155’
3762
+1 3781
; 3750)
1427
-
-
-
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD, draft
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings Review Code
Page l of 6
Pl. Other Identifier: none
*P2. Location: � Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside Primary# 3 3
HRI# 15045
Trinomial: CA-RIV-xnx
*Resou rec Name or#: NS#l
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead. CA. Date: 1980 (photorevised) T.3S: R3W: NE¼ of the NE¼ of Section 13. c. Address: none City: none (County) Zip:
d. UTM: 0486954m.E/3752483m.N (centerpoint). Zone 11. Note: Plots taken in field via Garv in Legacy GPS. NAD
1983.
e. Other Locational Data: The site is located at the base of Mount Russell. Elevation: 1610· ASL. *P3a. Description: This site consists of one milling feature outcrop exhibiting four saucer monars and one milling slick near the fool of an extreme slope at the northeast base of Ml. Russell. Milling Feature 1 is located on a granitic outcrop .J..40 x 2.00 meters in size. which is in fair condition. The milling surfaces are 102cm off the ground. Monar A measures

16.x 13cm in size and is 3.5cm deep. Mortar B measures L8x 16cm in size and is 0.5cm deep. Monar C measures .18.x 18cm in size and is 3cm deep. Mortar D measures 23.x 18cm in size and is 4cm deep. Milling slick E measures 24x 18cm in size. All arc moderately cxfoliatcd. No artifacts were detected within the site boundary.

P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings. structures. and objects.) see Photo log and Sketch maps

RECEIVED IN
JUL 10 2006
E\C
*P3b. Resource Attributes:

AP4.
*P-t Resources Present:
□Building □Structure
□Object �Site D
District □Element of
District OOthcr
PSb. Descri11tion of Photo:

None. See photo log for
complete views
*P6. Date Constructed/Age
and Sources: □Historic
�Prehistoric □Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Highland Fairv
iew Propenies
24525 Alessandro Boulevard
Moreno Valley. CA 92553
*PS. Recorded by:

M. Dice
Michael Brandman Associates
220 Commerce. Suite #200
Irvine. CA 92602
*P9. Date Recorded:

June 2. 2006
*PlO. Survey Type: CEQA
level Phase I surv
ey. ARMR
format.
*PlJ. Report Citation: Dice. M.H. (2006). Phase I Cultural Resources .'lssessmenl and Phase 2 Tesling of ('uflural Resources at TTM 3-1838, City a/Moreno I 'alley, California. On-file. Michael Brandman Associates. * Attachments: □NONE �Location Map �Sketch Map □Continuation Sheets □Building. Structure. and Object Record �Archaeological Record □District Record □Linear Feature Record OMilling Station Record 0Rock Art Record □Artifact Record �Photograph Record OOthcr (List):

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
23 ~1504D
Stateof California—TheResourcesAgency Primary # 3 9 - 5 DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION HRI # 1 0 4 5
PRIMARY RECORD, draft Trinomial: CA-RIV-xxxx
NRHPStatus Code 6Z
OtherListings oe Review Code rGA-RIV- 8 0 0 6 Date

P1. Other Identifier: none
*P2. Location: [J Not for Publication [ | Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *h., USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead. CA. Date: 1980 (photorevised) T.3S: R.3W: NEY of the NE of Section 13. ¢. Address: none City: none (County) Zip:
d. UTM: 0486954mE/3752483mN (centerpoint). Zone 11. Note: Plots taken in ficld via Garvin Legacy GPS. NAD 1983.
e. Other Locational Data: The site is located al the base of Mount Russell. Elevation: 1610" ASL. *P3a. Description: This site consists of one milling feature outcrop exhibiting four saucer mortars and one milling slick near the fool of anextreme slope al the northeast base of Mt. Russell. Milling Featurc | is located on a granitic outcrop 4.40 x 2.00 meters in size. which is in fair condition. The milling surfaces are 102cm off the ground. Mortar A mcasures 16x13cm in size and is 3.5cm deep. Mortar B measures 18x16cm in size and is 0.5cm deep. Mortar C measures 18x18cm in size and is 3cm deep. Mortar D measures 23x 18cm in size and is 4cm deep. Milling slick E measures 24x18cm in size. All arc moderately exfoliated. No artifacts weredetectedwithin the siteboundary.

P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings. structures. and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:
seePhoto logandSketchmaps AP4.
*P4. Resources Present:
[Building [Structure
[lobject [Site []
District [_JElcment of
District [Other
P5b. Description of Photo:

None. See photo log for
complelc views
*P6. Date Constructed/Age
and Sources: [Historic
Prehistoric []Both
D MN *P7. Owner and Address:

RECEIVE Highland Fairview Propcriies
24525 Alessandro Boulevard
JUL 10 2006 MorenoValley.CA 92553
*P8. Recorded by:

EIC M. Dice
Michacl Brandiman Associates
220 Commerce. Suite #200
Irvine, CA 92602
*P9. Date Recorded:

June 2. 2006
*P10. Survey Type: CEQA
level Phase | survey, ARMR — format.
*P11. Report Citation: Dice, M.H. (2006). Phase ! Cultural Resources Assessment and Phase 2 Testing of Cultural Resources at TTA34838, Citv of Moreno Valley, California. On-file. Michael Brandman Associalcs. *Attachments: [JNONE [XLocation Map [X]SketchMap []Continuation Sheets [Building. Structure. andObject Record [X]ArchacologicalRecord [District Record [[JLinear FeatureRecord [JMilling StationRecord [JRock Art Record [_JArtifact Record XPhotograph Record []Other (List):

DPR §23L (1/95) *Required information
1428
-
-
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # "�,( u • 1 i.. tJ v tt4,, i.,

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD, draft
HRI#-�-;r-,r---------,....,-��-- T rinomia�,Rl)J� 8 Q Q 6

* Al. Dimensions: a. Length 6111 (E-W) x b. Width 6111 (N-S). CA- 'Q\ \J- i:OD� Method of Measurement: □Paced □Taped □Visual estimate 00ther: site characteristics placed on sketch map using GPS mapping metllod.

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): □Artifacts 0Features 0Soil □Vegetation □Topography 0Cut bank □Animal burrow □Excavation □Property boundary OOther (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: 0High 0Low Explain: Phase I archaeological survey.

Limitations (Check any that apply): □Restricted access 0Pavcd/built over 0Site limits incompletely defined □Disturbances □Vegetation □Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: □None 0Unknown Method of Detennination: survey onJy. *A3. Human Remains: □Present �Absent □Possible □Unknown (Explain): None seen during survey. *A4. Features: (Number. briefly describe. indicate size. list assoc. cultural constituents. show location of cach feature on sketch map.)
TI1c site exhibits five milling features on an exposed granitic outcrop. Mortar A measures l fo: 13cm in size and is

3.5cm deep. Mortar B measures J 8x 16cm in size and is 0.5cm deep. Mortar C measures 18:x 18cm in size and is 3cm deep.

Mortar D measures 23xl 8cm in size and is 4cm deep. Milling slick E measures 24:xl8cm in size. All are moderately exfoliated.

Testing of the site Look place. Four shovel test pits were placed around U1e gnmite outcrop in an effort Lo delennine if any buried resources were noted in U1c area. No buried features were noted. nor were any artifacts observed. which allows a determination that the site is not a significant resource under CEQA guidelines. * AS. Cultural Constituents: (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts. culluml residues, etc., not associated with features.) None.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? 0No 0Ycs (If yes. allach Artifact Record/catalog & identify where ani.facts are curated.) If checked "Yes''. the artifacts would be located at U1e Michael Brandman Associates office. Ltv inc. CA.
* A 7. Site Condition: �Good 0Fair 0Poor (Describe disturbances.):
* A8. Nearest Water: (Type. distance, and direction.) Flood waters arc deposited seasonally i.n a playa roughly 2 miles to the southeast.
*A9. Elevation: 1610 feet above sea level.

AlO. Environmental Setting: (Describe cult11rally relevant variables such as vegetation. fauna. soils. geology. la11dfonn. slope, aspect. exposure. etc.) Floor of alluvial plain. Grassy . no trees. Steep-walled mountain to the south.

All. Historical Information: None.
*A12. Age: 0Prehistoric O Protohistoric D 1542-1769 0 1769-18-l8 D 1848-1880 0 1880-1914 D 1914- 1945 D Post 1945 0 Undetennined (Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known).

A 13. lnte111retations: (Discuss data potential. fonctionrsl, etlmic affiliation. and other interpretations) The site probably is associated wiU1 sporadic use of the San Jacinto Valley by ancestral groups.

A14. Remarks: None.

AlS. References: (Documents. infonnants. maps. and other references).

Dice. M.H. (2006). Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment and Phase 2 Tesling of Cultural Resources at ITAi 34838, City of Moreno I 'alley, California. On-file. Michael Brandman Associates.

A16. Photogra1lhs (List subjects. direction of view. and accession nwnbers or attach a Photograph Record.): See Photograph Continuation Page. Original Media/Negatives Kept at: None: digital. *A17. Form Pre11ared by: M. Dice
Affiliation and Address:

Michael Brandman Associates
220 Commerce, Suite 200
INine. Cal. 92602
DPR 523L (1/95)
Date: June 19. 2006.
*Required information
22-5049
AN _o State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # Jag = 1 50 4 DEPARTMENT OFPARKS ANDRECREATION HRI#
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD, draft Trinomiak-dATAN 8 0 016 ® Page 2 of 6 *Resource Name or #: NS #1
R= @\N- FOOL
*Al. Dimensions: a. Length 6m (E-W) x b. Width 6m (N-S).

Method of Measurement: [JPaced [Taped [Visual estimate [X]Other: sitecharacteristicsplacedon sketchmap usingGPS mappingmethod.

Method ofDetermination(Checkany thatapply.): [JArifacts [Features [Soil [JVegetation [JTopography [JCut bank [JAnimalburrow [JExcavation []Property boundary [JOther (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: DJHigh [CJLow Explain: Phase 1 archaeological survey.

Limitations (Check any that apply): [JRestricted access [_JPaved/builtover [Site limits incompletely defined [Disturbances []Vegetation [JOther(Explain):

A2. Depth: [JNone XUnknown Method of Detennination: survey only. *A3. Human Remains: [Present [X]Absent [Possible [JUnknown (Explain): Nonc scenduring survey. *A4. Features:(Number.briefly describe.indicatesizc,list assoc.culturalconstituents.show locationof eachfeatureon sketchmap.)
The site exhibits five milling featuresonan exposedgranitic outcrop. Mortar A measures 16x13cm in size and is

3.5cm deep. Mortar B measures [8x 16cmin size and is 0.5cm deep. Mortar C measures 18x18cm in sizeand is 3cm decp.

MortarD measures 23x18cm in sizeand is 4cm deep. Milling slick E measures 24x18cmin size. All are moderately exfoliated.

Testing of the site took place. Four shovel test pits were placed around the granite outcrop inan effort to determineif anyburicdresourceswerenotedin theareca. No buricdfeatureswerenoted.norwereany artifactsobserved.whichallowsa determination that the site is not a significant resourceunder CEQA guidelines. *AS. Cultural Constituents: (Describe andquantify artifacts,ecofacts.cultural residues,etc.. not associatedwith features.) None.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? DINo [JYes (If yes, attachAnifact Record/catalog& identify where artifacts are curated.) If checked“Yes™.the artifacts would be locatedat the Michacl Brandman Associatesoffice, Irvine, CA. ® *A7. Site Condition: [X]Good [JFair [JPoor (Describe disturbances.):
*A8. Nearest Water: (Type, distance, and direction.) Flood waters arc deposited seasonally in a playa roughly 2 miles to the southeast.
*AY. Elevation: 1610 feet abovesealevel.

All. Environmental Setting: (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils. geology. landforin, slope. aspect. exposure, elc.) Floor of alluvial plain. Grassy. no trees. Steep-walled mountain to the south.

All. Historical Information: None.
*A12. Age: [XPrehistoric [] Prothistoric [1 1542-1769 [J 1769-1848 [] 1848-1880 [] 1880-1914 [] 1914- 1945 [JPost 1945 [J Undetermined (Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or [actual historic dates if known).

A13. Interpretations: (Discuss data potential. function(s]. ethnic affiliation. and other interpretations) The site probably is associatedwithsporadicuseof theSanJacintoValleyby ancestralgroups.

Al4. Remarks: None.

AIS. References: (Documents. infonnants. maps.and other references).

Dice. M.H. (2000). Phase | Cultural Resources Assessment and Phase 2 Testing of Cultural Resources at TTM 34838, City ofMoreno | alley, California. On-file. Michael Brandman Associates.

A16. Photographs (List subjects. direction of view. and accession munbers or attach a Photograph Record): See Photograph Continuation Page. Original Media/Negatives Kept at: None: digital. *Al17. Form Prepared by: M. Dice Date: June 19, 2006.

Affiliation and Address:

Michacl Brandman Associates
220 Commerce, Suite 200
Irvine. Cal. 92602
DPR 523L (1/85) *Required information
1429
-
-
-
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP, draft

1==--��-----=-=-�-=--"'t Well0
., 9 .... • ...
.., t • • • ..
• -• • • ' r_
• • • • •• •·
----­ .,-......
, ... , i
Primary#
BRI#
Trinomial:
*Resou rec Name or#: NS#l
7 ..........
. ......
---::.�-1 - -
....
-
1-----�---
u
u
I
I
I
I
I
O
EF33:::l===i1Wl mT oi:======soo::E:=====ilOOO MITERS
Note: map to scale. Site boundal)' is shown as a black dot.

OPR 523L (1/95) •Required information
6 33- 15045
State of California— The Resources Agency Primary # 3 3 = DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# 1 § 0 4 5 LOCATION MAP, draft Trinomial: - 6
® Page 3 of 6 *ResourceNameor #: NS#1
26100004. USGS Sunnymead, CA. topographic map CH -QWNFOOL iid i ” " - y ; i _- 3
! pt J rm on
1000METERS
MapcreatedwithTOPO!E £2003NationalGeographic {wwwnationsigecgraphic. com topo) Note: map to scale. Site boundary is shown as a black dot.

DPR 623L (1/95) Required information
1430
-
-
-
State of Cal ifomia -The Resou recs Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP, draft

Map prepared by: J. Porter
'
'
\
-------�- ----' - --�-
----------.......,---
'1-EY
• � �A\1Cf.1t l"\et"T/llt
o · ,.,_,LU�I St.JU.
l<- STP
Plan view or site. Scale shown. North is up.

DPR 523L (1/95)
l>11i:.T
'
'
'
'
N
P.o,4l>::,
,-- -- -
---
'
' ' ' '
'
' '
' '
' '
'
'
'
'
-... - - -
I
I
I
I
I
' I ,,
'
Primary#
HRl#
Trinomial:
-:SJ- 15 oY 5
3s-1so45
*Resource Name or#: NS#l
6 Date: June 2. 2006 C:A- - Q \\)- 8'00lo
,,.

I'
I'
I
I
I
I
/
'
I
\
I
✓
/
/ J
', // '/
'
\
\
\
I
\
Ne'.J s,rlf. •I
G/i,/d�
�"
*Required information
L3-|Soeys
State of California— The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP, draft
Primary #
Pim 3815045

Map preparedby: J. Porter
Trinomial: cA RBa
*Resource Name or #: NS #1
8006
Date: June 2.2006 Ch ~R\\-800Mo
—NIE
Duss — \
—-—— a
ta
rns
-
1523s
Pata PN
vey,
s-QAUCER MeRYAR
©. Piling Stick X- STP
HRA gne
— Beg mt
19m
Pd od
rd ~ ram are id a —————— —— - ve sotmp mnii Sect ~. UTITL Le —— El Kak ad am dn da or
7 cn [J Pier RoADS wr” Lo Id hall - a oo Pd ~ “ - ~ N ~- - ~N - - Ld -
\ N -. ’ ~ \ - — Id SN AN ! Fe
Be LAGS
NEW SiTES]
tial de
ie
Plan view of site. Scale shown. North is up.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
1431
-
-
-
State of California-The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, draft

Camera format: Digital only
Primary
HRI#
Trinomial: CA 06
*Resource Name or#: NS #1
Lens size: CA-- R \"\J -�DOL,
Film type and speed: Negative on file at: __________ _
Photographs and photograph list.

Mo. Dav Time Exposure Subiect/Descriptioo View Toward Accession# 6 27 11am 215 Site overview NE
" " ., 216 Milling feature boulder NW
" " ., 213 Closer view of saucer mortars -
I \ 1
Site overview toward U1e northeast. Boulder wiU1 milling slicks lies in the foreground.

DPR 523L (1/95) •Required information

23. [Selb
State of California— The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANDRECREATION
Pima ® 3 ~ 15045
HRI#
® PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, draft

Trinomial: CEARIV--8D 0 6
*Resource Name or #: NS #1
CR-R\N-FOOL Camera format: Digital only Lens size:

Film type and speed: Negative on file at:

Photographsand photographlist.

Mo. Day Time Exposure Subject/Description View Toward Accession# 6 27 lam 213 Site overview NE
“ « - 216 Milling featureboulder NW
“ « * 213 Closer view of saucer mortars -
Site overview toward the northeast. Boulder with milling slicks lies in the foreground.

DPR 523L (1/95) "Required information
1432
-
-
-
State of CaLifomia -The Resources Agent")'

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, draft .___ _______ _:__ _________ �A--li��c}-f\Jo6

Milling fealurt: boulder al NS# I. View lo tht: norU1West.

Closer view of saucer mortars.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
33~1SoUs
Stateof California—TheResourcesAgency Primary
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRW 5 3 - i 5 0 4 5
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD, draft Trinomial: C BY @® CARIV- ou 0 6

Ch-R\\- TOO
_ Milling feature boulder al NS#1. View to thenorthwest.

Closer view of sauccr mortars.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
1433
Stitt of Callfomla ._ Natural R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomlal
P-33-015148 UPDATE
Property Name:------------------------------- Page _1_ of_5_ Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone 11S, NAD83, 484444 mE/ 3753918 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services, 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a milling site with a single slick. Overall dimensions of the site were recorded as 1.27m long by 1.10m wide and 0.37m high with the slick measuring 68cm by 50cm. ASM noted the site to have been disturbed by littering and graffiti among other disturbances. No associated cultural constituents were observed.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The granitic boulder measures 1.20m by 1.20m and 0.31m high and the slick was measured at 41cm southwest/northeast by 28cm southeast/northwest with no depth. Graffiti was observed on adjacent boulders.

Site is located in bottom left corner in foreground. Graffiti on adjacent boulders shown in middle-ground.

See attached forms for additional information.

Form completed by: H. Murphy, 12/27/17
DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
RECEIVED \N
FEB 2 2 20\8
E\C
State of California & NaturalReseurcesAgency Primary# P-33-015148 UPDATE DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
Trinomial

CONTINUATION SHEET
PropertyName:

Page _1__of _S__
Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone 11S, NADS83,484444 mE/ 3753918 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. lorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services, 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste. C / SanDiego, CA 92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a milling site with a single slick. Overall dimensions of the site were recorded as 1.27m long by 1.10m wide and 0.37m high with the slick measuring 68cm by 50cm. ASM noted the site to have been disturbed by littering and graffiti among other disturbances.No associatedcultural constituents were observed.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The granitic boulder measures 1.20m by 1.20m and 0.31m high and the slick was measured at 41cm southwest/northeast by 28cm southeast/northwest with no depth. Graffiti was observed on adjacent boulders.
i : h 3 5 . _— A a 3 i’ |
Site is located in bottom left corner in foreground. Graffiti on adjacent boulders shown in middle-ground.

Seeattachedforms for additionalinformation. RECEIVED IN Formcompletedby: H. Murphy,12/27/17
FEB22 208
EIC
DPR523L(Rev.1/1995)(Word 9/2013) ———
1434
State of Callfomla • The Rt1ource1 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomlal

P-33-015148 UPDATE
----------
*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000
0 Woff
DPR 523J (9/2013)
*Date of map: _2018 __ _
·1?.
. :
, ..
• • •
. . .
- .... ---.. --��-
_______
.. . �-
:; 1:�.r,,r.,�= ------�
1 * Required information
| stateofCalifornia- TheResourcesAgency Primary# P-33-015148 UPDATE BEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial

*MapName: _Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: _ 2018 §2
DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
1435
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

Primary# P-33-015148 UPDATE
Trinomial
*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.2 m. (n/s) >< b. Width: 1.2 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: □ Paced ■ Taped □ Visual estimate □Other:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): □ Artifacts ■ Features □ Soil □ Vegetation □ Topography □ Cut bank □ Animal burrow □ Excavation □ Property boundary □ Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ■ High □ Medium □ Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): □ Restricted access □ Paved/built over □ Site limits incompletely defined □ Disturbances □ Vegetation □ Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: □ None ■ Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: □ Present □ Absent □ Possible ■ Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder on a north/south running ridgeline of a hill. The boulder contains a single milling slick measuring 41cm SW/NE by 28cm SE/NW.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed. The vicinity has been disturbed by graffiti, refuse dumping, recreational activity. *A6. Were Specimens Collected? ■ No □ Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: □ Good ■Fair □ Poor (Describe disturbances.): Nearby boulders have graffiti and refuse was observed in the area
*AS. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 760' NNE *A9. Elevation: 1660 AMSL
AlO. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): On ridgeline of hillside facing east. Visibility was fair at 50 percent due to dense dry brush approximately 4' high.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: ■ Prehistoric □ Protohistoric □ 1542-1769 □ 1769-1848 □ 1848-1880 □ 1880-1914 □ 1914-1945 □ Post 1945 □ Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

Al3. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al4. Remarks:

AlS. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

Al6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
State of California—Natural Resources Agency Primary # P-33-015148 UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.2m. (n/s) x b. Width: 1.2 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: [1Paced W Taped [I Visualestimate [OOther:

Method of Determination {Checkany that apply.): OIArtifacts B Features [J Soil [ Vegetation [I Topography 0 Cut bank 0 Animalburrow [OExcavation [ Property boundary [J Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ® High [0 Medium [OOLow Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): [I Restricted access [1 Paved/built over [I Site limits incompletely defined O Disturbances [1Vegetation [ Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: 0 None HBUnknown Method of Determination:
*A3. HumanRemains: [J Present [0 Absent [J Possible B Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder on a north/south running ridgeline of a hill. The boulder contains a single milling slick measuring 41cm SW/NE by 28cm SE/NW.
*A5. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed. The vicinity has been disturbed by graffiti, refuse dumping, recreational activity. *A6. Were Specimens Collected? B No [Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: 0 Good BFair [I Poor (Describe disturbances.): Nearby boulders have graffiti and refuse was observed in the area
*A8. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 760’ NNE *A9. Elevation: 1660 AMSL
A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect,exposure,etc.): On ridgeline of hillsidefacingeast.Visibility wasfair at 50 percent due to densedry brush approximately 4’ high.

All, Historical Information:
*A12. Age: B Prehistoric [ Protohistoric [1542-1769 [11769-1848 [11848-1880 [J 1880-1914 [J 1914-1945 O Post1945 [I Undetermined Describeposition in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function(s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

A14. Remarks:

A1S5. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *Al17. Form Preparedby: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 11995)(Word 2/2015)
1436
State of C1llfoml1 it, The Rt1ourct1 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

*Drawn by: HMurphy
Primary# P-33-015148 UPDATE
HRI#
Trlnomlal
*Resource Name or#
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.

Stateof California&TheResourcesAgenoy Primamy# P-33-015148UPDATE BEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRIi#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial ]

*Drawn by: HMurphy *Date of map: 2018
DPR523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow. 1437
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

MILLING STATION RECORD
Primary# P-33-015148
Trinomial

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger
Feature
1 Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation

1.2m sw/ne x 1.2m se/nw
X
X
X
X
x Height
x Height
x Height
x Height
x Height

0.31m h
Date: 12/19/18
Bedrock Type and Condition
Granitic
Feature Milling Type Length Width Depth Contents Remarks # Surface
#
1 1
CO Conical mortar
OM Oval mortar
SM Saucer mortar
Other:

MS
(cm) (cm)
41sw/ne 28 se/nw
Type Key:

PM Possible mortar
MS Milling slick
BM Basin milling feature
DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
(cm)
0 0
S Filled with soil
L Filled with leaves
U Unexcavated
Other:

Contents Key:

R Contains rock
P Contains pestle
M Contains mano
NOTE: Attach plan(s) of milling stations.

State of California— Natural Resources Agency Primary # P-33-015148 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial

MILLING STATION RECORD

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger Date: 12/19/18
Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation Bedrock Type and Condition 1 1.2m sw/ne x1.2mse/nw x Height 0.31mh Granitic
X x Height
X x Height
X x Height
Py x Height
Feature Milling Type Length Width Depth Contents Remarks # Surface (cm) (cm) (cm)
#
1 1 MS 41sw/ne 28se/nw | O 0
Type Key: Contents Key:

CO Conicalmortar PM Possiblemortar S Filledwithsoil R Contains rock OM Oval mortar MS Milling slick L Filled with leaves P Contains pestle SM Saucer mortar BM Basin millingfeature U Unexcavated M Contains mano Other: Other:

DPR 523F(Rev.1/1995)(Word2/2015)
NOTE: Attach plan(s) of milling stations.
1438
-
•
-
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
85 - \ 5 \ l\�
Primary #:. __
3_3__- _1 5_1__4____ _ 8
HRI #: ....,....,. _______________ _
Trinomial:._......,. ______________ _ NRHP Status Code: ______________ _ Other Listings. _________________________ _
Review Code ____ Reviewer__________ Date ______ _

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: X Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside AUG O 8 2006 *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R 3W; SE¼ of SW¼ of SE¼ of NW¼ of Sec 11; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: City: Zip: EI (
d. UTM: Zone11; 484526mE/ 3753716mN {GPS, NAD27)
e. Other Locational Data: Located on the crest of a ridge 00 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 540 m east of Moreno Beach Dr.
*P3a. Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located on the crest of a ridge 90 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 540 m east of Moreno Beach Dr. No associated p-ehistoric artifacts were foond. The feature is 1.27 m lorg, 1.1 O m wide and 37 cm high. It includes a single 68-x-50-cm milling slick with moderate levels of grinding and wear. The site has been disturbed by overgra:zing, littering, graffiti, and mobrbike traffic. Vegetation consists ci disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub with tansey mustard, brittlebush fiddleneck, and grasses now growing on the site. *P3b. Resource Attributes: AP4 - Bedrock milling feature. *P4. Resources Present: D Building D Structure D Object X Site D District D Element of District D Other:

Sb. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990, Frame 4. View southsoutheast with milling feature in center foreground and Cottonwood Ave.
beyond.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

D Historic X Prehistoric D Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
*PS. Recorded by:

Ken Moslak
ASM Affiliates Inc.
2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
*P10. SurveyType: Pedestrian
reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Cltatloo: Moslak, Ken, and Jerry Schaefer 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Cottonwood Trails Project, Riverside County, California.
*Attachments: D NONE X location Map D Sketch Map D Continuation Sheet D Building/Structure/Object Record D Archaeological Record D District Record D Linear Feature Record D Milling Station Record D Rock Art Record D Artifact Record D Photograph Record D Other:
53-1314
State of California— TheResourcesAgency Primary #: 33-15148 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #;
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial;
( NRHP Status Code;
OtherListings
Review Code Reviewer. Date

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: 3 Not for Publication O Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside AUG 0 8 2006 *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R3W,; SEY, of SW, of SE's of NW, of Sec 11; San BernardinoB.M. E |C Cc. Address: City: Zip:
d. UTM: Zone11; 484526mE/ 3753716mN (GPS, NAD27)
e. Other Locational Data: Located on the crest of a ridge 90 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 540 m east of Moreno Beach Dr.
*P3a. Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located on the crest of a ridge 90 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 540 m east of Moreno Beach Dr. No associated prehistoric artifacts were found. The feature is 1.27 m long, 1.10 m wide and 37 cm high. It includes a single 68-x-50-cm milling slick with moderate levels of grinding and wear. The sitehas been disturbed by overgrazing, littering, graffiti, and motorbike traffic. Vegetation consists of disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub with tansey mustard,brittlebush fiddieneck, and grasses now growing on the site. *P3b. Resource Attributes:AP4 - Bedrock milling feature. ® *P4. Resources Present: 0 Building O Structure 0 Object 3 Site O District 0 Element of District O Other:

FAITE ails <M Sb. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990, Frame 4. View southsoutheast with milling featurein center foreground and CottonwoodAve.
beyond.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

O Historic 3 Prehistoric O Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
~ "P8. Recorded by:

Ken Moslak
ie; ASM Affiliates Inc.
x 2034 Corte Del Nogal
i Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
8 “P10. Survey Type: Pedestrian
MM reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Citation: Moslak, Ken, and JerrySchaefer 2006. CulturalResources Study for $e Cottonwood TrailsProject, Riverside County, California.
*Attachments: OONONE 3 Location Map O Sketch Map 0 Continuation Sheet 0 Building/Structure/Object Record a Archaeological Record 0 District Record [I Linear Feature Record O Milling Station Record O Rock Art Record 0 Artifact Record O Photograph Record O Other: |
1439
-
•
-
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
33-15148
Primary#: _________________ _
Trinomial: __________________ _

LOCATION MAP

*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif.
.-'l•··
.. .,.· ,/ .......
.
.
.
.
... ,,,.· . � .
. ,· ••••••••• ,. � ... r Jl
,.
..... ········� � .
.\, .
__ ..... ,.,.-······· r.,, i .
...
.
... \
.. --�.-� ... '·
·� ....... .

Kllorneters
*Resource Name or #: ASM2
*Scale: 1 :24,000
�.= �--· 18-'l� ol -­
,;
. u
,'I•
0 • t�]i-.
. �r·
/8100--�-­ .,
2 '.t
f �====: .... .,�-=,-�".'=-�j
, Wells�-
"
.,
� ��--- --- w - 0
*Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980)
• u 1
ell
Well·
2%5-15\4%
State of California — TheResources Agency Primary #:
33-151438
DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION Trinomial:

LOCATION MAP
( Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or #: ASM2
*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980) .. § | ' N
. ' 4 Lo
b . N _=
- . a WA . NUE =o — I
CET et 18
So Shee
~ a . - RY 1
Lion OE,
MEN 8 y eh HS iow Il
[I "
[] [] []
FemmueczmrragandiF maT RII AK H =n 0 i
LY . , “.,.~~] Wn, bi) em i SS “me ee
-a RUAN mm BS ~ =
C4 Z
- 3
Pr
He Ld2
¥ bi t
~3 3
i” 2 qa 4
A [1 a , rian n ile
. =~ gp
[ .

E>
L) ne id] eA» -7 TE
1674 i
iv Dasnswrrrans- tno
—————— ——- o-oo
1440
State of C1llfoml1 � Natural Rt1ourct1 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomlal
P-33-015149 Upd te
Property Name:------------------------------- Page_1_ of _5_ Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone 115, NAD83, 484444 mE/ 3753918 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services, 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a single milling slick with no associated artifacts.

ASM recorded the site/boulder to measure 1.12m x 0.65m x 5cm with a slick measuring 67cm x 31cm alongside a dirt access road.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The site consists of a single, surface-level granitic boulder located on the southern edge of an east/west trending single-lane dirt access road. Partially in the road and partially in the shoulder of the road, the site is likely to be continually disturbed by any activity on this road. While the site is primarily in the road, visibility was excellent though adjacent brush, consistent with that recorded in 2006, averaged at 2-4 feet high. An intersection of dirt access roads lies approximately 10 feet to the east. No additional associated artifacts were observed during the relocation effort.

See attached Milling 523F and Sketch 523K forms for additional information and updated measurements.

Overview of site, facing west.

Form completed by: H. Murphy, 12/27/17
DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013}
in the road.

RECEIVED IN
FEB 2 2 2018
EiC
\Stateof California&NaturalResourcesAgency Primasy# P-33-015149 Update DEPARTMENTOFPARKS ANDRECREATION HRI#
Trinemial

CONTINUATION SHEET
PropertyName:

Page__1__of _5
Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone 11S, NADS3, 484444 mE/ 3753918 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services, 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a single milling slick with no associated artifacts.

ASM recorded the site/boulder to measure 1.12m x 0.65m x 5cm with a slick measuring 67cm x 31cm alongside a dirt access road.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The site consists of a single, surface-level granitic boulder located on the southern edge of an east/west trending single-lane dirt access road. Partially in the road and partially in the shoulder of the road, the site is likely to be continually disturbed by any activity on this road. While the site is primarily in the road, visibility was excellent though adjacent brush, consistent with that recorded in 2006, averaged at 2-4 feet high. An intersection of dirt access roads lies approximately 10 feet to the east. No additional associated artifacts were observed during the relocation effort.

See attached Milling 523F and Sketch 523K forms for additional information and updated measurements.

Overview of site, facing east with road
#1
AL i
pS
fl 2 \ Bas ACR: : hr er in the road.

Overview of site, facing west.

RECEIVEDIN
Formcompletedby:H.Murphy,12/27/17 FEB 22 2018
EiIC
DPR523L(Rev.1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
1441
State of Callfomla • The Rt1ourct1 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomlal
P-33-015149 UPDATE

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: _2018 __ _ DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
StateofCailfornia-TheResourcesAgency Prmary# P-33-015149UPDATE DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRi#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: __2018 ]
+ TTYESTICCLIY TT 1. IS
ASN
DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
1442
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

Primary# P-33-015149 UPDATE
Trinomial
*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.05 m. (n/s) x b. Width: 0.70 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: D Paced ■ Taped D Visual estimate □Other:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): D Artifacts ■ Features D Soil D Vegetation D Topography D Cut bank D Animal burrow D Excavation D Property boundary D Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ■ High D Medium D Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): D Restricted access D Paved/built over D Site limits incompletely defined D Disturbances D Vegetation D Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: D None ■ Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: D Present D Absent D Possible ■ Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder measuring 1.05m (n/s) by 0.70m (e/w) by 0.28m high with a single slick measuring 59cm (n/s) by 27cm (e/w) with no depth.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? ■ No D Yes {If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: D Good ■Fair D Poor (Describe disturbances.): The boulder lies halfway in a single-lane dirt access road just west of an intersection of multiple dirt access roads. *AS. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 280' to the east *A9. Elevation: 1730 AMSL
AlO. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located at the base of a hillside among a community of coastal sage scrub and boulders. Vegetation in the area at the time of survey was approximately 3-4' high and moderately dense though visibility of the site was excellent due to being located in a road.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: ■ Prehistoric D Protohistoric D 1542-1769 D 1769-1848 D 1848-1880 D 1880-1914 D 1914-1945 D Post 1945 D Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

Al3. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al4. Remarks:

Al5. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
State of California—Natural Resources Agency Primary # P-33-015149 UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKSAND RECREATION Trinomial

ARCHAEOLOGICALSITERECORD

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.05 m. (n/s) x b. Width: 0.70 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: [J Paced B Taped 0 Visualestimate [OOther:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.):OIArtifacts B Features [J Soil [ Vegetation [JTopography O Cutbank [0 Animal burrow [J Excavation [ Property boundary [J Other(Explain):

Reliability of Determination: B High [0 Medium [Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): [I Restricted access [I Paved/built over [1 Site limits incompletely defined O Disturbances [Vegetation [I Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: O None B Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. HumanRemains: [I Present [0 Absent [J Possible B Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketchmap.): A single granitic boulder measuring 1.05m (n/s) by 0.70m(e/w) by 0.28m high with a single slick measuring 59cm (n/s) by 27cm(e/w) with no depth.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? B No [Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: [0 Good MFair [ Poor (Describe disturbances.): The boulder lies halfway in a single-lane dirt access road just west of an intersection of multiple dirt access roads. *A8. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 280’ to the east *A9. Elevation: 1730 AMSL
A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located at the base of a hillside among a community of coastal sage scrub and boulders. Vegetation in the area at the time of survey was approximately 3-4’ high and moderately dense though visibility of the site was excellent due to being located in a road.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: B Prehistoric [J Protohistoric [11542-1769 [11769-1848 [11848-1880 [11880-1914 [J 1914-1945 O Post 1945 [Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function(s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Ald. Remarks:

A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

Al6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Preparedby: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word2/2015)
1443
State of Callfomla � The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

*Drawn by: HMurphy
Primary# P-33-015149 UPDATE
HRI#
Trlnomlal
*Resource Name or#
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.

SateofCalifornia& TheResourcesAge: ~ Pmary# P-33-015149UPDATE ‘DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HR#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial

*Drawn by: HMurphy *Date of map: 2018
DPR523K(9/2013) NOTE:Include bar scaleand north arrow.
1444
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

MILLING STATION RECORD
Primary# P-33-015149 Update
Trinomial

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger Date: 12/1817
Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation Bedrock Type and Condition

1.05m N/S x 0.70m E/W x Height 0.28m Granitic and good
Feature# Milling
Surface#
1 1
CO Conical mortar
OM Oval mortar
SM Saucer mortar
Other:

Type
MS
x x Height
x x Height
x x Height
x x Height
Length Width Depth
(cm) (cm) (cm)
59 N/S 27 E/W 0
Type Key:

PM Possible mortar
MS Milling slick
BM Basin milling feature
DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
Contents Remarks
0 Straddles road and shoulder
S Filled with soil
L Filled with leaves
U Unexcavated
Other:

Contents Key:

R Contains rock
P Contains pestle
M Contains mano
NOTE: Attach plan(s) of milling stations.

State of California —Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENTOF PARKS ANDRECREATION

MILLING STATION RECORD
Primary # P-33-015149Update
Trinomial
Page5 of 5
Form Prepared by: B. Bolger
Resource Name or # (Assignedby Recorder):

Date: 12/1817
SM Saucer mortar
Other:

BM Basinmillingfeature
[Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation Bedrock Type and Condition 1 1.05mN/S x 0.70m EW x Height 0.28m Granitic and good
x x Height x x Height x x Height x x Height
Feature# Milling Type | Length | Width Depth Contents Remarks Surface# (cm) (cm) (cm)
1 1 MS S9N/S | 27EW | 0 0 Straddles road and shoulder
Type Key: Contents Key:

CO Conical mortar PM Possiblemortar S Filledwithsoil R Contains rock OM Ovalmortar MS Millingslick L Filledwithleaves P Contains pestle U Unexcavated M Contains mano Other:

DPR 523F(Rev. 1/1995)(Word2/2015)
NOTE: Attach plan(s) of milling stations.
1445
•
•
-
�J-\S\l..\9
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #: __ 3---=-3 _-_____ 1 5 _1_4_9 ___ _
HRI #: ________________ _
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial: ________________ _ NRHP Status Code:. _____________ _ Other Listings ___________________________ _
Review Code____ Reviewer__________ Date ______ _

P1.
*P2.

Other Identifier:

Location: X Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R 3W; SW¼ of NE1/ ..of SE¼ of NW¼ of Sec 11; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: City: Zip:
d. UTM: Zone11; 484637mE/ 3753840mN (GPS, NAD27)
AUG O 8 2006
EiC
e. Other Locational Data: Located next to a dirt road 215 m north of Cottonv.ood Ave. and 650 m east of Moreno Beach Dr.
*P3a. Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located adjacent to di1 road 215 m north of Cottorwood Ave. No associated prehistoric artifacts were found. The feature measures 1.12 x 0.65 m and rises 5 cm above the ground surface. The feature has a singe 67-x-31-cm milling slick v.ith moderate levels of grinding c11d wear. The site has been disturbed by vehicle traffic, overgrazing, littering, c11d illicit dumping. Vegetation consists c:i disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub with tansey mustard, brittlebush fiddleneck, and grasses now growing on the site. Another similar (ASM4) lies 36 m to the south.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: AP4 - Bedrock milling feature. *P4. Resources Present: D Building D Structure D Object X Site D District D Element of District D Other:
5b. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990, Frame 6. View west of
milling feature - low boulder in lower
center frame.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

D Historic X Prehistoric D Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
*PB. Recorded by:

Ken Moslak
ASM Affiliates Inc.
2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
*P10. Survey Type: Pedestrian
reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Citation: Moslak, Ken, and Jerry Schaefer 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Cottonwood Trails Project, Riverside County, California.
*Attachments: D NONE X Location Map D Sketch Map D Continuation Sheet D Building/Structure/Object Record D Archaeological Record □ District Record □ Linear Feature Record D Milling Station Record D Rock Art Record D Artifact Record D Photograph Record D Other:
23-1549
State of California — TheResources Agency Primary #; 33 = 1 b] 1 4 9 DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#:

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial: C NRHP Status Code:

Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page1 of 2 *ResourceNameor #: ASM3DRAFT
P1. Other identifier: R EC E IVE » WN
*P2. Location: 3 Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside AG 08 2006 *b. USGS 7.5" Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R3W; SW of NEY. of SEY of NW, of Sec 11; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: City: Zip: EIC
d. UTM: Zone 11; 484637mE/ 3753840mN (GPS, NAD27)
e. Other Locational Data: Located next to a dirtroad 215 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 650 m east of MorenoBeach Dr.
*P3a. Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located adjacent to dirt road 215 m north of Cottormood Ave. No associated prehistoric artifacts were found. The feature measures 1.12 x 0.65 m and rises 5 cm above the ground surface. The feature has a singe 67-x-31-cm milling slick with moderate levels of grinding and wear. The site has been disturbed by vehicle traffic, overgrazing, littering, and illicit dumping. Vegetation consists of disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub with tansey mustard, brittlebush fiddleneck, and grasses nowgrowing on the site. Another similar (ASM4) lies 36m to the south,
*P3b. Resource Attributes: AP4 - Bedrock milling feature. ® *P4. Resources Present: O Building O Structure 0 Object ¥ Site 0 District O Element of District 0 Other:
-- 5b. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990, Frame 6. View west of
milling feature - low boulderin lower
center frame.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

O Historic 3 Prehistoric 0 Both
: *P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
*P8. Recorded by:
§ Ken Moslak
ASM Affiliates Inc.
2 2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
*P10. Survey Type:Pedestrian
§ reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Citation: Moslak, Ken, and JerrySchaefer 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Cottonwood Trails Project, Riverside County, California.
*Attachments: 0 NONE 3 Location Map 0 Sketch Map DOContinuation Sheet [0 Building/Structure/Object Record O Archaeological Record 0 District Record O Linear Feature Record O Milling Station Record O Rock Art Record O Artifact Record O Photograph Record O Other:
1446
•
•
-
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
;;';;>- l 5 \ l.\°i
Primary#: _3_3_ .. ..;..a.1___ 5 1____ 4 9 ___ _
Trinomial: __________________ _

LOCATION MAP

*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif.
*Resource Name or #: ASM3
*Scale: 1 :24,000
••✓•
.,····
,, ... ,. .. ······
-
i;;i �- - - -r: -�--- - -
---- - 0
*Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980)
1 Well·
Sunnymead, USGS 7.5' Quadrangle, 1967 (Photorevisedl980) _,/·i', __ ./ ,·•' ........ .
————EEIISSI—S——————————
2%5-19149
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #: i) 3 - 16 1 4 ) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial:

LOCATION MAP
( Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or #: ASM3
*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980) 0X ZN
4757 A YY, |
SL ; th ’ Oex! R
N “8 EEE §
Hi 3W
3 q 3 BN 1
x RESARANREPRESPRARTERY 7 -
4 - N MEA .. M + Wekisn . ly 2 i
RA [] [1 ile
it n
fl
hea. moa "
I 2S
\ [J 3[|
| ti—— 3FELLA
3 []
gl1676 18
Si. Ansaserrrasw— wna
1447
State of C1llfoml1 • Natural Reaourcea Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
P-33-015150 Upd te
Property Name:------------------------------- Page _1_ of _5_ Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone llS, NAD83, 484558.9 mE/ 3753998.8 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services, 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a single milling slick with no associated artifacts.

ASM recorded the site/boulder to measure 1.35m x 1.25m x 0.10m with a slick measuring 40cm x 23cm alongside a dirt access road.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The site consists of a single, surface-level granitic boulder located S'S west of an north/south trending single-lane dirt access road. No additional associated artifacts were observed during the relocation effort.

See attached Milling 523F and Sketch 523K forms for additional information and updated measurements.

Overview of site, facing east.

Form completed by: H. Murphy, 12/27/17
DPR 523L (Rev. 1/199S)(Word 9/2013)
Overview of site, facing west from adjacent dirt
access road

RECEIVED IN
FEB 2 2 2018
EiC
mr —— == ——— StateofCalifornia & NaturalResourcesAgsncy Primary © P-33-018180 Update DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
Trinomial

CONTINUATION SHEET
PrepertyName:

Page _1__of _§__
Update Revisited on: December 18, 2017
UTM: Zone 11S, NAD83, 484558.9 mE/ 3753998.8 mN
Update Recorded by: H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, B. Bolger, M. Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental Services,9915 Businesspark Ave,Ste. C / SanDiego, CA92131 This site was originally recorded by ASM in July 2006 as a single milling slick with no associated artifacts.

ASM recorded the site/boulder to measure 1.35m x 1.25m x 0.10m with a slick measuring 40cm x 23cm alongside a dirt access road.

Tierra successfully relocated the resource and found the site to be in much the same condition as was initially recorded. The site consists of a single, surface-level granitic boulder located 5’5 west of an north/south trending single-lane dirt access road. No additional associated artifacts were observed during the relocation effort.

See attached Milling 523F and Sketch 523K forms for additional information and updated measurements.

Overview of site, facing east.
access road

RECEIVEDIN
FEB22 2018
EIC
Formcompletedby: H.Murphy,12/27/17
DPR523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013)
1448
Stitt of Callfomla • The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
P-33-015150 UPDATE

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: _2018 __ _ DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information

LOCATIONMAP
State of California - TheResources Agency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION
Primary# P-33-015150UPDATE
HRI#
Trinomial

*Map Name: Sunnymead
pr: WY \ nt
[-] »
+ Ee J
J amd
/ 4
) = ® 3 i
( Addy’ » mm rides | ~<% A
PS H
. ! rt"
{ J Bi
J 3 Roe
AQ (7
» SAY
EE Need
2 ANE. =
| & &»
i Ad 1 ~~ “ . Tr oR
a - hel -, Rx
- re. Yt
) sr ~ = (1 Va \ TE RET NG) Pa dle SA .

Pres
DPR523J (9/2013)
es *Resource Name or #
1:24,000 *Date of map: _ 2018
BF ¥
- Gy k] SE oN oo.
: 243,
Gil \ | = 0)
Ba
-
) ] » sored
ars
BEE i-
. ‘oe Did = 2
ai =
TO
i 33 | gegmpyyses - oP =
N ] ' 2 iemnaaaIRIEL. g X ) 2 { > Lo {. Welte
\. [pas18180 e
~.0 a i > sediencannswneeew Y
: 71h _ Ed
Tg AL § - :
asmas as sam tn : a — ST vs 2a dButed
eo. 3.3.0 2.8 A 3%, " wt,
* Required information
1449
State of California-Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

Primary# P-33-015150 UPDATE
Trinomial
*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.35 m. (n/s) >< b. Width: 1.32 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: D Paced ■ Taped D Visual estimate □Other:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): D Artifacts ■ Features D Soil D Vegetation D Topography D Cut bank D Animal burrow D Excavation D Property boundary D Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ■ High D Medium D Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): D Restricted access D Paved/built over D Site limits incompletely defined D Disturbances D Vegetation D Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: D None ■ Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: D Present D Absent D Possible ■ Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder measuring 1.35m (n/s) by 1.32m (e/w) by 0.14m high with a single slick measuring 32cm (n/s) by 14cm (e/w) with no depth.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? ■ No D Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: ■Good □Fair D Poor (Describe disturbances.): The boulder lies just west of a dirt access road that runs north/south through the property.
*AS. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 335' to the east *A9. Elevation: 1730 AMSL
AlO. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located at the base of a hillside among a community of Riversidean sage scrub and boulders.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: ■ Prehistoric D Protohistoric D 1542-1769 D 1769-1848 D 1848-1880 D 1880-1914 D 1914-1945 D Post 1945 D Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

Al3. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

A14. Remarks:

Al5. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

Al6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
State of California—Natural Resources Agency Primary # P-33-015150 UPDATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKSAND RECREATION Trinomial

ARCHAEOLOGICALSITERECORD

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.35m. (n/s) x b. Width: 1.32m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: [0 Paced B Taped [I Visualestimate [JOther:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): OJArtifacts B Features [J Soil [I Vegetation [I Topography O Cut bank [J Animalburrow [J Excavation [I Property boundary [J Other(Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ® High [OOMedium DO Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): [I Restricted access [1 Paved/built over [I Site limits incompletely defined O Disturbances [ Vegetation [I Other(Explain):

A2. Depth: OONone HMUnknown Method of Determination:
*A3. HumanRemains: [I Present [J Absent [Possible B Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder measuring 1.35m (n/s) by 1.32m (e/w) by 0.14m high with a single slick measuring 32cm (n/s) by 14cm (e/w) with no depth.
*AS5. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? BM No [Yes (Ifyes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: MGood [Fair [I Poor (Describe disturbances.): The boulder lies just west of a dirt access road that runs north/south through the property. *A8. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 335’ to the east *A9. Elevation: 1730 AMSL
A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located at the base of a hillside among a community of Riversidean sage scrub and boulders.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: EHPrehistoric [I Protohistoric [11542-1769 [11769-1848 [11848-1880 [1880-1914 [1914-1945 O Post1945 [Undetermined Describeposition in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function(s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al14. Remarks:

A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Preparedby: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
1450
State of C1llfoml1 o The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

*Drawn by: HMurphy
Primary# P-33-015150 UPDATE
HRI#
Trinomlal
*Resource Name or#
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.

Stateof California& TheResourcesAge

SKETCHMAP

ney DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION
Primary# P-33-015%88UPDATE
HRW
Trinomial
*Drawn by: HMurphy
P-33-015150 |"
rE
,
- ~
. ©
a0 oy
x
Tn, 3 bA
*Resource Name or #
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow. 1451
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

MILLING STATION RECORD
Primary# P-33-015150 Update
Trinomial

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger
Feature Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation
1 1.32m N/S x 1.35m E/W x Height
Feature# Milling
Surface#
1 1
CO Conical mortar
OM Oval mortar
SM Saucer mortar
Other:

Type
MS
x x Height
X x Height
x x Height
x x Height
Length Width Depth
(cm) (cm) (cm)
32 N/S 19 E/W 0
Type Key:

PM Possible mortar
MS Milling slick
BM Basin milling feature
DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
Date: 12/1817
Bedrock Type and Condition

0.14m Granitic and fair
0 Contents
S Filled with soil
L Filled with leaves
U Unexcavated
Other:

Remarks
Contents Key:

R Contains rock
P Contains pestle
M Contains mano
State of California—Natural Resources Agency Primary # P-33-015150Update DEPARTMENTOFPARKS ANDRECREATION Trinomial

MILLING STATION RECORD
Page5 of 5 Resource Name or # (Assignedby Recorder):

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger Date: 12/1817
Feature Qutcrop Dimensions(m) and Orientation Bedrock Typeand Condition 1 1.32mN/S x1.35mE/W xHeight 0.14m Graniticandfair x x Height x x Height x x Height x x Height Feature# Milling Type Length Width Depth Contents Remarks Surface# (cm) (cm) (cm)
1 1 MS 32 N/S 19E/W 0 0
|
TypeKey: Contents Key:

CO Conicalmortar PM Possiblemortar S Filledwithsoil R Contains rock OM Oval mortar MS Millingslick L Filledwithleaves P Contains pestle SM Saucermortar BM Basinmilling feature U Unexcavated M Containsmano Other: Other:

DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
1452
-
-
83- \ S\ S'O
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary#: 3 3 - 1 5 1 5 Q
HRI #: ________________ _
PRIMARY RECORD ��n
�;���-tu_s _C�o_d_e_: _____________
--------------_
Other listings _________________________ _
Review Code____ Reviewer Date ______ _

P1.
*P2.

Other Identifier:

Location: • Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside AUG O 8 2006 *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R 3W; NW¼ of SE¼ of SE¼ of NW¼ of Sec 11; San Bernardino B.M. EI( c. Address: City: Zip:
d. UTM: Zone11; 484642mE/ 3753803mN (GPS, NAD27)
e. Other Location al Data: Located next to a dirt road 180 m north of Cotton'AOod Ave. and 650 m east of Woreno Beach Dr.
*P3a. Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located adjacent to di1 road 180 m north of Cottormood Ave. No associated prehistoric artifacts were found. The feature measures 1.35 x 1.25 m and rises 10 cm above the ground surface. The feature has a single 40-x-23-cm milling slick with moderate levels of grinding and wear. The site has been disturbed by vehicle traffic, overgrazing, littering, and illicit dumping. Vegetation consists of a disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub community with tansey mustard, brittlebush flddlenock, and grasses now growirg on the site. Another similar (ASM3) lies 36 m to the north.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: AP4 - Bedrock milling feature. *P4. Resources Present: D Building D Structure D Object • Site D District D Element of District D Other:

Sb. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990, Frame 8. View to
southeast with milling feature in
foreground and RIV-2863 at distant left
rocks.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

D Historic X Prehistoric D Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
*PS. Re corded by:

Ken Moslak
ASM Affiliates Inc.
2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
*P10. SurveyType: Pedestrian
reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Citation: Moslak , Ken, and Jerry Schaefer 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Cottonwood Trails Project, Riverside County, California.
- *Attachments: D NONE • Location Map D Sketch Map D Continuation Sheet D Building/Structure/Object Record D Archaeological Record D District Record D Linear Feature Record D Milling Station Record D Rock Art Record o Artifact Record D Photograph Record D Other:
23-151SD
State of Califomia — TheResources Agency Primary #: 3 3 - 1 b) 1 5 (0 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #:

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial; ARY NRHP Status Code;
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer, Date

P1.
*P2.
*P3a.
*P3b.

Other Identifier: IN Location: 3 Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside AUG 08 2006 *h. USGS 7.5" Quad: Sunnymead, Calif. Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S; R3W,; NWY, of SEY. of SE of NW, of Sec 11; San Bernardino B.M. EIC c. Address: City: Zip:
d. UTM:Zone11; 484642mE/ 3753803mN (GPS, NAD27)
e. Other Locational Data: Located next to a dirtroad 180 m north of Cottonwood Ave. and 650 m east of Moreno Beach Dr.

Description: This site consists of a single bedrock milling feature located adjacent to dit road 180 m north of Cottorwood Ave. No associated prehistoric artifacts were found. The feature measures 1.35 x 1.25 m and rises 10 cm above the ground surface. The featurehas a single 40-x-23-cm milling slick with moderate levels of grinding and wear. The site has been disturbed by vehicle traffic, overgrazing, littering, and illicit dumping. Vegetation consists of a disturbed Riversidian Sage Scrub community with tansey mustard, brittlebush fiddleneck, and grasses now growing on the site. Another similar (ASM3) lies 36 m to thenorth.

Resource Attributes: AP4 - Bedrock milling feature.
[ *P4. Resources Present: DOBuilding O Structure DO Object 3 Site O District O Element of District D Other:
*P11.

Riverside County, California.

Sb. Description of Photo:

Roll 10990,Frame 8. Viewto
southeast with milling featurein
foreground and RIV-2863 at distant left
rocks.
*P6. Date Age and Source:

O Historic 3 Prehistoric O Both
¥ *P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown private owner
*P8. Recorded by:

Ken Moslak
ASM Affiliates Inc.
2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
*P9. Date Recorded: July 24, 2006
*P10. Survey Type: Pedestrian
| reconnaissance survey
Report Citation: Moslak, Ken, and Jerry Schaefer 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Cottonwood Trails Project, *Attachments: 0 NONE 3 Location Map O Sketch Map O Continuation Sheet 0 Building/Structure/Object Record 03 Archaeological Record DODistrict Record O Linear Feature Record O Milling Station Record O Rock Art Record O Artifact Record O Photograph Record 0OOther:
1453
-
-
-
'33-\S\SD
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP

*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif. *Scale: 1 :24,000
Primary
Trinomial:
#: ___
_____
3,...,__________
3_- ...,..,1--"5........,__l ....,;5 ...... Q-_____ _
ASM4
*Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980)
: I
---.. .... :-4-• ,I'
. ! �
- I
------t'-- .;,--...P� -� • '1828
1 Well·
� .... · ....
·�, ......
. ,'
25-1550
State of Califomia — The Resources Agency Primary #: 29 - ] h 5 { \ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial:

LOCATION MAP
® Page 2 of 2 *Resource Name or #: ASM4
*Map Name: Sunnymead, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1967 (photorevised 1980) H
1624 13
- Ea Ey EE LT Oa
® Sunnymead,USGS 7.5” Quadrangle, 1967 (Photorevised1
1454
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # :

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial:

NRHP Status Code: Other Listings:
 Update or Supplement Review Code: Reviewer: Date:

*Resource Name or Number (Assigned by Recorder): CWA63-6 P1. Other Identifier: N.A.
*P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: Sunnymead Date: 1967 (photorevised 1980) T 3S, R 3W, NE ¼ of NE ¼ of Sec. 15, San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: N.A. City: Moreno Valley
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone: 11; 483885 mE 3752792 mN (NAD 83) e. Other Locational Data (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., when appropriate: The site is located in a former agricultural field, 35 feet west of the west edge of Moreno Beach Drive, and 0.13 mile south of Alessandro Boulevard.

*P3a. Description (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries): This historic period site consists of the remains of an irrigation pumping feature and a capped well, located in a former agricultural field near the west side of Moreno Beach Drive (formerly Pettit Street).

Feature 1 is a possible pump stand, now missing its pumping equipment, located 35 feet west of Moreno Beach Drive. It includes a concrete slab footing measuring approximately 5 feet (east-west) by 4 feet (north-south), with an 8-inch-diameter steel pipe projecting upwards from its east half to a height of approximately 6 feet. A horizontal steel pipe connects the vertical pipe to a pipe junction at the west end of the slab, but the junction is no longer connected to any other pipe. The concrete footing and steel pipes are flanked by two concrete irrigation standpipes. One of the standpipes, adjacent to the north side of the footing, is 18 inches in diameter and approximately 12 inches high. The other standpipe, near the south side of the footing, is 15 inches in diameter and approximately 18 inches high.

Feature 2 appears to be a capped well, located approximately 55 feet north-northeast of Feature 1, and 20 feet west of Moreno Beach Drive. Feature 2 consists of a 12-inch-diameter steel pipe, set in concrete, and projecting to a height of 42 inches above the surrounding ground surface. The top of the pipe is covered with a flat steel plate, and the sides of the pipe are coated with tar. Feature 1 is at the east end of an east-west row of olive trees that extends approximately 300 feet towards the west.
*P3b. Resource Attributes (List Attributes
and Codes): AH5 (Well); AH6 (Water
Conveyance System)
*P4. Resources Present:  Buildings
 Structure  Object  Site  District
 Element of District  Other (Isolate)
P5b. Description of  Photo  Drawing
(View, date, accession#): Feature 1
(foreground) and Feature 2 (background, next
to tree). View towards northeast, 2/26/2010.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources
 Prehistoric  Historic  Both
*P7. Owner and Address: Private
P8. Recorded by (Name,
affiliation, address): C. Cotterman
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
215 N. 5th Street, Redlands, CA 92374
*P9. Date  Recorded Updated:

February 26, 2010
*P10. Type of Study (Describe):

Pedestrian Cultural Resources Survey
*P11. Report Citation (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none."):

Cotterman, Cary D., and Evelyn N. Chandler
2010 Cultural Resources Inventory of the Proposed Southern California Edison Lakeview Substation and Telecom Fiber Optic Cable Route Project, Riverside County, California. Prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc., Redlands, California. *Attachments:  NONE  Location Map  Sketch Map  Continuation Sheet  Building, Structure, and Object Record  Linear Feature Record  Archaeological Site Record  District Record  Milling Station Record  Rock Art Record  Artifact Record  Photograph Record  Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #: 33-019919 DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION HRI #:

PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial:

NRHP Status Code:

Other Listings:

O Update or Supplement Review Code: Reviewer: Date:

*ResourceName or Number (Assignedby Recorder): CWA63-6
P1. Other Identifier: N.A.
*P2. Location: Not for Publication [I Unrestricted *a. County: Riverside *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: Sunnymead Date: 1967 (photorevised1980) T 3S,R 3W, NE ¥%ofNE ¥%of Sec.15, SanBernardinoB.M. c. Address: N.A. City: Moreno Valley d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone: 11; 483885 mE 3752792 mN (NAD 83) e. Other Locational Data (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., when appropriate: The site is located in a former agricultural field, 35 feet west of the west edge ofMoreno BeachDrive, and 0.13 mile south of Alessandro Boulevard. *P3a. Description (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries): This historic period site consists of the remains of an irrigation pumping feature and a capped well, located in a former agricultural field near the west side of Moreno BeachDrive (formerly Pettit Street).

Feature 1 is a possible pump stand, now missing its pumping equipment, located 35 feet west of Moreno Beach Drive. It includes a concrete slab footing measuring approximately 5 feet (east-west) by 4 feet (north-south), with an 8-inch-diameter steel pipe projecting upwards from its east half to a height of approximately 6 feet. A horizontal steelpipe connects the vertical pipe to a pipe junction at the west end of the slab, but the junction is no longer connected to any other pipe. The concrete footing and steel pipes are flanked by two concrete irrigation standpipes. One of the standpipes, adjacent to the north side of the footing, is 18 inches in diameter and approximately 12 inches high. The other standpipe, near the south side of the footing, is 15 inches in diameter and approximately 18 inches high.

Feature 2 appears to be a capped well, located approximately 55 feet north-northeast ofFeature 1, and 20 feet west ofMoreno Beach Drive. Feature 2 consists of a 12-inch-diameter steelpipe, set in concrete, andprojecting to a height of 42 inches above the surrounding ground surface. The top of the pipe is covered with a flat steel plate, and the sides of the pipe are coated with tar. Feature 1 is at the east end of an east-west row of olive trees that extends approximately 300 feet towards the west.
*P3b. Resource Attributes (List Attributes
and Codes): AHS5 (Well); AH6 (Water
Conveyance System)
*P4. Resources Present: [1 Buildings
Bl Structure [0 Object BE Site [OODistrict
O Element ofDistrict [1 Other (Isolate)
P5b. Description of ® Photo [I Drawing
(View, date, accession#): Feature 1
(foreground) and Feature 2 (background, next
to tree). View towards northeast, 2/26/2010.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources
O Prehistoric E Historic O Beth
*P7. Owner and Address: Private
P8. Recordedby (Name,
affiliation, address): C. Cotterman
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
215 N. 5" Street, Redlands, CA 92374
*P9. Date Recorded [Updated:

February 26, 2010
*P10. Type of Study (Describe):

Pedestrian Cultural Resources Survey
*P11. Report Citation (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none."):

Cotterman, Cary D., andEvelynN. Chandler
2010 Cultural Resources Inventory of the Proposed Southern California Edison Lakeview Substation and Telecom Fiber Optic Cable Route Project, Riverside County, California. Prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc.,Redlands, California. *Attachments: [0 NONE [Xl Location Map OO Sketch Map BE Continuation Sheet [1 Building, Structure, and Object Record [ Linear Feature Record 00 Archaeological Site Record OO District Record OO Milling Station Record [ Rock Art Record [I Artifact Record [I Photograph Record O Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information
33-019919 1455
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary #:

CONTINUATION SHEET (UPDATE) Trinomial:

*Recorded by: Ecorp Consulting, Inc. *Date: 2/26/2010  Continuation  Update Feature 1, possible irrigation pumping equipment stand. View towards southwest, February 26, 2010.

Feature 2, possible capped well. View towards northeast, February 26, 2010.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION Primary #: 55019919
CONTINUATION SHEET (UPDATE) Trinomial:

*Recorded by: Ecorp Consulting,Inc. *Date: 2/26/2010 Continuation [J Update J
aw N i X hy 7;
i
J : ad 7. ew towards southwest, February 26, 2010.
hp a i:

Feature 2, possible capped well. View towards northeast, February 26,2010.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required information
33-019919 1456
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #:

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial:

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1967 (photorevised 1980) DPR 523J (1/95) * Required information

State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #1 33-(7199719 DEPARTMENT OFPARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial:

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1967(photorevised1980) ~EN ian t EmowEn
wan © |Site Location .
iA, | Lear
1000FEET 0
PrintedfromTOPO!£2001NationalGeographicHoldings(www._topo.com) DPR 523J (1/95) * Required information
33-019919 1457
State of Callfomla � The Reaourcea Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Other Listings
Review Code
Primary#
HRI#
Trinomial
NRHP Statua Code
Reviewer
33 � 2
CA-RIV- 1 2 6 7 8
Date
Page_l_of _s_ *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder): _TE_S-_M_V_-_0_0l_H ___________ _ P1. Other Identifier:--------------------------------
*P2. Location: ■ Not for Publication D Unrestricted
*a. County Riverside and (P2c, P2e, and P2b orP2d. Attach a Locatbn Map as necssary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead Date: T3S; R3W; S ½ of NW¼ of Sec 11; SBBM c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: Zone 11S, 484408.94 mE/ 3753922.6 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, drections to resmrce, eevation, decimal degrees, etc., as appiopriate) *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resource and Its major eements. Include desgn, materials, condition, alerations, size, setting, and boundaries) This resource consists of the remnants of a historic-era fence line. The resource is located on a south-facing slope of a saddle situated between a small hill to the east and a large hill to the west. The fence line is comprised of 14 wooden posts, 2 metal posts and barbed wire. The fence extends approximately 330 feet along an east/west axis and at its eastern terminus, turns toward the south approximately 20 feet. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and cales) _A_H_ll_W_al_ls'-/f_en_c_e_s __________________ _ P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photogiaph requred for buildings, structures, and otjects. *P4. Resources Present:

RECE\VeD \t\
FEB 2. 2. 2.0\S
c\C
__ Building� Structure _Object
Site District
Element of District
__ Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo (view, date,
accession#): 12/18/17, facing northwest
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:
x Historic Prehistoric Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Rancho Belago, LLC
12671 High Bluff Drive, Ste 150
San Di , CA 92130
PS. Recorded by (Name, affiliation, and
address):

H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, R Bolger, M.

Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra Environmental
Services, Inc., 9915 Businesspark Ave, Ste C.

San Di , CA 92131
*P9. Date Recorded: 12/18/17
*P10.Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Cultural Resources Assessment for the L' Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA. Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 * Attachments:

Archaeological Record
Rock Art
DPR 523A (9/2013)
� LocMap
District Ra::ord
Artifact Record
x Continuation Sheet
x Linear Feature
Photo Record
_ Building, Structure, Object _ Milling Station
x Sketch
*Required infonnation
Stateof California& TheResourcesAgsnoy — Primary#
DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
PRIMARYRECORD Trinomial CA-RIV-12¢6T78
NRHPStatus Code
OtherListings
ReviewCode Reviewer Date 1
i

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: # Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted
*a. County Riverside and (P2c,P2e, andP2b orP2d. Attacha LocatonMap as necessary.) USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead Date: T3S; R3W; S 2 of NW Y%of Sec 11; SBBM Address City Zip
UTM Zone 11S, 484408.94 mE/ 3753922.6 mN
pa Other Locational Data:(e.g.,parcel#, directions to resource, elevation,decimaldegrees, etc.,as appropriate) odd *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resourceanditsmajorelements. Includedesign,materials,condition,akerations, size,setting,andboundaiies) This resource consists of the remnants of a historic-era fence line. The resource is located on a south-facing slope of a saddle situated between a small hill to the east and a large hill to the west. The fence line is comprised of 14 wooden posts, 2 metal posts and barbed wire. The fence extends approximately 330 feet along an east/west axis and at its eastern terminus, turns toward the south approximately 20 feet. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attibutes and cades) AH 11 Wabk/f en ces P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph requiredforbuildings, strudures,and okjects. | *P4.Resources Present:
) Building_xStructure __ Object
Site District
Element of District
Other (Isolates, etc.)
PSb. Description of Photo (view, date,
accession#): 12/18/17,facingnorthwest
*P6. DateConstructed/Age and Source:
_X Historic ___Prehistoric __ Both
RECEV ED \ *P7. Owner and Address:

Rancho Belago, LLC
FEB 22 2018 12671HighBluffDrive,Ste150
SanDiego, CA92130
P8. Recorded by (Name,affiliation,and
EIC address):

H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, R Bolger, M.

Jorgensen, D. Faithof Tierra Environmental
Services, Inc., 9915Businesspark Ave, Ste C.

SanDiego, CA92131
*P9. Date Recorded: 12/18/17
*P10.Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation: (Citesurveyreport andothersources, or enter"none.”) Cultural Resources Assessment for the L'Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA.Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 *Attachments: _x_ LocMap _x__ ContinuationSheet ___ Building,Structure,Object ___ ArchaeologicalRecord District Record _X_ LinearFeature __ MillingStation _ Rock Art ____ ArtifactRecord ___. Photo Record _X_ Sketch DPR 523A(9/2013) “Required information 1458
Stile of C1llfoml1 • The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
81 CA-RIV- 1 2 6 7 8
Page _2 __ of 5 *Resource Name or# TES-MV-001 H (MV1)
*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: __ l_:_2_4�,_o_o_o ______ _ *Date of map: _2018 __ _ DPR 523J (
9/2013) * Required information
Stateof California - TheR A Primary # -9
DEPARTMENT OFPARKE ANDFECTION HR 33 2 80 81
LOCATION MAP Trinomial CA-RIV-12678

*MapName: _Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Dateof map: _ 2018 oa out | J
in [1 SN ox = = I MN...
o SY . wes fos ; * Sia = iH 5
. Sy 4 "oe [] _
Lo 1\ N ; ¢
- (] hd {
v [4 / ) i Re *
“e J { | -» rr
[-] pg ts
2 Ee mk reno Solas /
Cece en
Sea iia i
q
. ~~
(§ IN
; hey Zn, *
iB X.
4: : MVS put ) aA i 3 IR 4 \
3 I a 'y MV4 Zo
| N MH y A — 8 : . Nn 2 ry A’
of ~~ *e |
BAR ~~ INT
EEE Th 3
pan Ng] a
z 3 lave | Fa BR ky PE Se = SN [ x LE dn Na :
rd ~~
$
DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
1459
State of Callfomla • Tht Rttourctt Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LINEAR FEATURE RECORD
HRI
Primary
Trlnomlal
33 CA-RIV- 1 2 6 7 8

Ll. Historic and/or Common Name: .JJ/..]_
L2a. Portion Described: D Entire Resource X Segment D Point Observation Designation:
b. Location of point or segment: NAO 83: datum Post 1: 484408.94 mE/ 484351.6 mN Post 14: 484327 mE/ 3753926 mN; Metal Posts- 484306 mE/ 3753923 mN L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide plans/sections as appropriate.) The fence extends approximately 330 feet along an east/west axis and at its eastern terminus, turns toward the south approximately 20 feet. All of the posts are disintegrating and only seven remain erect. The posts measure 6.5-inches (in) wide by 4-in deep, by 57-in length and are positioned irregularly apart from one another; ranging between three to 21 feet apart. Four sets of double-strand twisted wire wrap each post.

Additional strands of wire wrap two boulders adjacent to the post at the eastern terminus for stability purposes.

The western terminus has two iron posts within three feet of each other and measure 2.25-in wide by 0.25-inches deep by 34-in high.

L4. Dimensions: Top Width _:: Bottom Width --Height or Depth 60" high. depth unknown Length of Segment 350'
LS. Associated Resources: None.

L6. Setting: (Describe natural features, landscape characteristics, slope, etc., as appropriate.): The fence line runs in an east/west axis along a south-facing slope. The fence line is located mid-slope of a saddle and to the west of a drainage between two hills.

L7. Integrity Considerations:

Integrity is poor as nine of fifteen wooden posts and wire have collapsed due to disrepair and erosion.

L8b. Description of Photo, Map, or Drawing (View, scale, etc.) .---------------------, L9. Remarks: Historic aerials of the project area show partial L8a. Photograph, Map or Drawing
See sketch map attached
DPR 523E (9/2013)
grading back to 1966. However, the northern terminus of the grading occurs south of this resource approximately 35 feet. (historicaerials.com)
LlO. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy
Tierra Environmental Services
9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste C. / San Diego, CA 92131
Lll. Date: 1/3/18
#
#
CT ]
State of California & TheResources Agency B Primary 33 - 2 Fe} U 0 1 # DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI ¥»
LINEAR FEATURERECORD Trinomiel CA-RIV-12678

L1. Historic and/or CommonName:n/a
L2a. Portion Described: [I Entire Resource X Segment 0 Point Observation Designation:
b. Location of point or segment: NAD 83: datum Post 1: 484408.94 mE/ 484351.6 mN Post 14: 484327 mE/ 3753926 mN; Metal Posts- 484306 mE/ 3753923 mN L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segment/point. Provide plans/sections as appropriate.) The fence extends approximately 330 feet along an east/west axis and at its eastern terminus, turns toward the south approximately 20 feet. All of the posts are disintegrating and only seven remain erect. The posts measure 6.5-inches (in) wide by 4-in deep, by 57-in length and are positioned irregularly apart from one another; ranging between three to 21feet apart. Four sets of double-strand twisted wire wrap each post.

Additional strands of wire wrap two boulders adjacent to the post at the eastern terminus for stability purposes.

The western terminus has two iron posts within three feet of each other and measure 2.25-in wide by 0.25-inches deep by 34-in high.

L4. Dimensions: Top Width _-- Bottom Width --Height or Depth _60” high, depth unknown Length of Segment 350°
L5. AssociatedResources: None.

L6. Setting: (Describe natural features, landscape characteristics, slope, etc., as appropriate.): The fence line runs in an east/west axis along a south-facing slope. The fence line is located mid-slope of a saddle and to the west of a drainage between two hills.

L7. Integrity Considerations:

Integrity is poor as nine of fifteen wooden posts and wire have collapsed due to disrepair and erosion.

L8b. Description of Photo,Map, or Drawing (View, scale, etc.) L9. Remarks: Historic aerials of the project area show partial L8a. Photograph, Map or Drawing grading back to 1966. However, the northern terminus of the grading occurs south of this resource approximately 35 feet.

Seesketch map attached (historicaerials.com)
L10. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy
Tierra Environmental Services
9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste C. / San Diego, CA92131
L11.Date: 1/3/18
DPR 523E (9/2013)
1460
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

Drawn By: H. Murphy
DPR 523K (1/95)
Primary#:

HRI#: 3
Trlnomlal #:

Resource Name or#: TES-MV-001 H
Date: 1/3/18
Required information is bold
StateofCalifornia~The ResourcesAgenc: Primary#: 38 - 7300 1 DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial#: of R | [ 1 2 4 78

Drawn By: H. Murphy Date: 1/3/18
, AEP “%
= a
%Le
Eel Wy
it A) wh
a
aR
’ !
DPR 523K (1/95) Required information is bold
1461
Stitt of Callfomla ti Natural R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: TES-MV-001 H

Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
33 .... zBC8l
CA-RIV- 1 2 6 7 8-
Datum post, eastern terminus, with northern boulder wrapped in wire for stability of post.

DPR 523L (Rev. 1/199S)(Word 9/2013)
8 - - DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREANON”Li 33-28G81
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET 12678
PropertyName:TES-MV-001H CA RIV 1 6
PageSofS
Datum post, eastern terminus, with northern boulder wrap, Te pa——— ped in wire for stability of post. a | 1462
State of Callfomla f:i The R11ource1 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Other Listings
Review Code
Primary#
HRI#
Trtnomlal
NRHP Status Code
Reviewer Date
Page_l _of _4_ *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder): TES-MV-002 /VEQ f N P1. Other Identifier: ______________________ F�E-B......._..2 ....... 2---.2 ....... g ......18 *P2.
*a.
*b.

Location: ■ Not for Publication
County Riverside
D Unrestricted
and (P2c, P2e, and P2b orP2d. Attach a Locatbn Map as ne e,� rUSGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead Date: T3S; R3W; SW¼ of NW ¼of Sec 11; SBBM C. Address City Zip
d. UTM: Zone 11S, 484246 mE/ 3753923 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, drections to resource, elevation, decimal degrees, etc., as appropriate) Located approximately 355m ENE of the intersection of Cottonwood Ave and Moreno Beach Dr. *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resoU"ce and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alerations, size, settng, and boundaries) This resource is a possible rock shelter located on the south-facing slope of a large hill among an outcrop of granitic boulders. The possible shelter is comprised of eight boulders which create the perimeter and a capstone cantilevers off the eight to the southwest side of the hill.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and cales) _A _P1_4_-_Ro_c_k_S _he_lt_e_r __________________ _ *P4. Resources Present: __ Building_Structure _Object
x Site District
Element of District __ Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo (view, date,
accession #): 12/18/17, facing south.

Closeu of western interior.

P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:

Historic x Prehistoric Both
*P7. Owner and Address:

Rancho Belago, LLC
12671 High Bluff Drive, Ste 150
San Di , CA 92130
PB. Recorded by (Name, affiliation,
and address):

H. Murphy of Tierra Environmental
Services, Inc., 9915 Businesspark Ave,
Ste C. San Di , CA 92131
*P9. Date Recorded: 12/18/17
*P10.Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Cultural Resources Assessment for the L' Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA. Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 * Attachments:
� Archaeological Record
Rock Art
DPR 523A (9/2013)
� LocMap
District Record
Artifact Record
Continuation Sheet
Linear Feature
Photo Record
Building, Structure, Object _ Milling Station
x Sketch
*Required information
StateofCailfornia&TheResourcesAgency Primary# 3 q - 28
BEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI#
PRIMARY RECORD Th : esac CARIV-12679
OtherListings
ReviewCede Reviewer Date
Page
oo 1 of 4 *Res ourchlame or # (Assigned byrecorder): _TES-MV-002 —— RECEWED| P1.OtherIdentifier: rel 222018
*P2. Location: MB Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted E
*a. County Riverside and(P2c,P2e, andP2b orP2d. Attacha LocatonMap as n IC *b. USGS7.5' Quad:SunnymeadDate: T3S;R3W; SWY%of NW Y% of Sec11; SBBM c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: Zone 11S, 484246 mE/ 3753923 mN
e. Other Locational Data:(e.g.,parcel#, directionsto resource,elevation,decimal degrees,etc.,asappropriate) Located approximately 355mENEof the intersectionof CottonwoodAveandMoreno BeachDr. *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resourceanditsmajor elements. Include design,materials,condition,akerations, size,setting, andboundaries) This resource is a possible rock shelter located on the south-facing slope of a large hill among an outcrop of granitic boulders. The possible shelter is comprised of eight boulders which create the perimeter and a capstone cantilevers off the eight to the southwest side of the hill.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributesand cades) A P1 4 - Ro kek& *P4,Resources Present:

Building___ Structure __ Object
x_ Site __ District
Element of District ___ Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects.

BEPSh. Description of Photo (view, date,
ENE accession #). 12/18/17, facing south.

Closeupof westerninterior.

P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:

Historic x _ Prehistoric Both
’'P7. Owner and Address:
i RanchoBelago,LLC
3 12671 High Bluff Drive, Ste 150
f2SanDiego, CA 92130
P8. Recordedby(Name,affiliation,
Fand address):

JH. Murphy of Tierra Environmental LF Services, Inc., 9915 BusinessparkAve, SteC. SanDiego, CA92131
B'P9. Date Recorded:12/18/17
"P10. Survey Type:(Describe)
intensive Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation:(Cite surveyreportand other sources,or enter"none.”) Cultural Resources Assessment for the L'Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA.Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 *Attachments: _x_ Loc Map __ ContinuationSheet ____ Building,Structure,Object _X_ ArchaeologicalRecord __ DistrictRecord .___ LinearFeature ___ MillingStation __ RockArt ___ ArtifactRecord ___ PhotoRecord _X_ Sketch DPR 523A(9/2013) *Required information 1463
Stitt of C1llfoml1 • Tht Rttourctt Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal CA-RIV- 1 2 6 7 9

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: _2018 __ _ DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
Stateof California-TheResourcesAgency Primary # 9 q - D) R 0 B 4 DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION HRI | |
LOCATION MAP Trinomial C A R IV. 1 2 6 7 9
- - |

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: __2018 DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
1464
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Primary#
Trinomial

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.70 m. (n/s) x b. Width: 1.37 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: □ Paced ■ Taped □ Visual estimate □Other:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): □ Artifacts ■ Features □ Soil □ Vegetation □ Topography □ Cut bank □ Animal burrow □ Excavation □ Property boundary □ Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ■ High □ Medium □ Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): ■Restricted access □ Paved/built over □ Site limits incompletely defined □ Disturbances □ Vegetation □ Other (Explain): Due to the steep slope, it was not possible to take exterior measurements.

A2. Depth: D None ■ Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: □ Present □ Absent □ Possible ■ Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): The interior measures 170cm north/south by 137cm east/west by 81cm high. A portion of the southwest interior shows evidence of past fire activity. No apparent disturbances are visible as the location is somewhat difficult to reach on the side of the slope.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? ■ No □ Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: ■ Good □Fair □ Poor (Describe disturbances.):
*AS. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 450m to the NE *A9. Elevation: 1753 AMSL
AlO. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): The site is located about mid-slope of a south-facing hillside. Granitic boulders are ubiquitous among a Riversidean sage scrub community.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: ■ Prehistoric □ Protohistoric □ 1542-1769 □ 1769-1848 □ 1848-1880 □ 1880-1914 □ 1914-1945 □ Post 1945 □ Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al4. Remarks: Due to the difficulty reaching the site's location as well as the fact the possible structure is just under one meter high inside, it seems unlikely this would be utilized for a long period of time. However, it would provide temporary shelter from the elements nicely.

Al5. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

Al 6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
State of California— Natural ResourcesAgency Primary # a J I 0 Q [4] r A DEPARTMENT OF PARKSAND RECREATION Trinomial
ARCHAEOLOGICALSITERECORD ~ A RN / 1 ? 6 / 9

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 1.70 m. (n/s) x b. Width: 1.37 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: [J Paced B Taped [Visual estimate [IOther:

Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): 0 Artifacts B Features [J Soil [0 Vegetation [1Topography 0 Cut bank 0 Animalburrow [J Excavation [J Property boundary [0 Other(Explain):

Reliability of Determination: BMHigh [OOMedium [OOLow Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): MRestricted access [J Paved/built over 0 Site limits incompletely defined 0 Disturbances [J Vegetation [1 Other (Explain): Due to the steep slope, it was not possible to take exterior measurements.

A2. Depth: 0 None WMUnknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: [0 Present [0 Absent [J Possible BMUnknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): The interior measures 170cm north/south by 137cm east/west by 81cm high. A portion of the southwest interior shows evidence of past fire activity. No apparent disturbances are visible as the location is somewhat difficult to reach on the side of the slope.
*AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. WereSpecimensCollected? BMNo [O Yes (If yes,attach Artifact Recordor catalogand identify where specimensare curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: MGood OFair [I Poor (Describe disturbances.):
*AB. Nearest Water (Type,distance,and direction.): unnamedblueline 450m to the NE *A9. Elevation: 1753 AMSL
A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils,geology,landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): The site is located about mid-slope of a south-facing hillside. Granitic boulders are ubiquitous among a Riversidean sage scrub community.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: B Prehistoric [1 Protohistoric [11542-1769 [1769-1848 [11848-1880 [11880-1914 [11914-1945 0 Post 1945 0 Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al4. Remarks: Due to the difficulty reaching the site's location as well as the fact the possible structure is just under one meter high inside, it seems unlikely this would be utilized for a long period of time. However, it would provide temporary shelter from the elements nicely.

A1S. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Preparedby: H.Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C/ San Diego, CA92131 *Requiredinformation
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995){(Word2/2015)
1465
State of Callfomla � Tht Rttourctt Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

*Drawn by: HMurphy
,teep
slope to south
0 Bould rs
C::> Capstone boulder
Fire-affected rock surface
, • \., Contour lines
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
C) Q
v V
OQ/\_QC) ... ..,vw ,.,,
CA-RIV1 2 6 7 9
*Resource Name or# TES-MV-002
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013} NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.

C2
RIV- 12679
*Resource Name or # TES-MV-002
*Date of map: 2018
CAHRI#
Trinerhial
Primary#
*Drawn by:: HMurphy
State of California ® TheResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION

SKETCHMAP

akx me ! ir Sa
Sp 4x
Not to Scale
Fire-affectedrock surface
Capstoneboulder
Contour lines
\ .
’
PTY
Sama
\ PM
slape to saul
steep
DPR523K(9/2013) NOTE Include bar scale and north arrow. 1466
State of Callfomla ti The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Other Listings
Review Code
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
NRHP Statua Code
Reviewer
CA-RI\/- 1 2 6 8 o
Date
Page_l_of _s_
P1. Other Identifier:
*Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder): TES-MV-003 RECEIVED IN FEB 2 2 2018
*P2. Location: ■ Not for Publication □ Unrestricted
*a. County Riverside and (P2c, P2e, and P2b orP2d. _Attach a Locatbn Map as�-) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead Date: T3S; R3W; NW¼ of tm ¼ of Sec 11; SBBM LI\... c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: Zone 11 S, 484496.9 mE/ 3754005.8 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, directions to resoLJ"ce, elevation, decmal degrees, etc., as appropriate) Located approximately 660'NNW of the intersection of Cottonwood Ave and Somergate Dr. *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alerations, size, settilg, and boundaries) This resource consists of a prehistoric milling slick on a granitic boulder. The boulder is located on an eastern-facing gentle slope measures Sm N/S by 1.9m E/W by 1.25m high. The slick is located on the eastern side of the boulder and measures 26cm N/S x 15cm E/W.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and cedes) _A _P4_-_B_ed_r _oc_k_M_i_lli_ng�------------------ *P4. Resources Present: __ Building_Structure _Object
x Site District
--Element of District
__ Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo (view, date,
accession#): 12/18/17, facing north
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:

Historic x Prehistoric Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
--....... -•Rancho Belago, LLC
12671 High Bluff Drive, Ste 150
San Di , CA 92130
PS. Recorded by (Name, affiliation,
and address):

H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, R Bolger, M.
orgensen, D. Faith of Tierra
Environmental Services, Inc., 9915
Businesspark Ave, Ste C. San Diego, CA
92131
*P9. Date Recorded: 12/18/17
*P10.Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive Pedestrian
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Cultural Resources Assessment for the L' Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA. Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 * Attachments:

2._ Archaeological Record
Rock Art
DPR 523A (9/2013)
x Loe Map - District Record
Artifact Record
Continuation Sheet
Linear Feature
Photo Record
Building, Structure, Object

2._ Milling Station
x Sketch
*Required information
[StateofCalifornia & TheResources,Agenoy Primary# 33 - 5 ‘DEPARTMENTOFPARKS ANDRECREATION HRI# ! 0
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA-RIV-126
NRHPStatusCode
OtherListings
ReviewCode Reviewer Date
Page1 of 5 *ResourceNameor # (Assignedbyrecorder): _TES-MV-003 RE CE VI I ) IN P41.OtherIdentifier:
*P2. Location: WBNot for Publication 0 Unrestricted
*a. County Riverside and(P2c,P2e, andP2b orP2d. Attach a LocatonMap asEe *b. USGS 7.5"Quad: Sunnymead Date: T3S; R3W ; NW % of NW % of Sec 11; SBBM Cc. Address City Zip
d. UTM: Zone 11S, 484496.9 mE/ 3754005.8 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directionsto resource,elevation,decimaldegrees,efc.,asappropriate) Located approximately 660’NNW of the intersection of Cottonwood Ave and Somergate Dr. *P3a. Description: (Descrbe resourceandits major elements. Includedesign,materials,condition, akerations, size,setting,andboundaiies) This resource consists of a prehistoric milling slick on a granitic boulder. The boulder is located on an eastern-facing gentle slope measures Sm N/S by 1.9m E/Wby 1.25m high. The slick is located on the eastern side of the boulder and measures 26cm N/S x 15cm E/W.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attibutes and cades) A P4- Bedc k Ming | *P4.Resources Present:

Building___ Structure ___Object
x Site ___District
Element of District
Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photographrequiredfor buildings, structures,andobjects.

BPSh. Description of Photo (view, date,
iaccession#): 12/18/17,facingnorth
#3*p6, DateConstructed/Age and
Source:

Historic x Prehistoric Both
P7. Owner and Address:
ancho Belago, LLC
2671 HighBluff Drive,Ste150
8SanDiego, CA92130
$P8. Recorded by (Name, affiliation,
and address):

H. Murphy, K. Stankowski, R. Bolger, M.

Jorgensen, D. Faith of Tierra
Environmental Services, Inc., 9915
Businesspark Ave, Ste C. San Diego, CA
92131
*P9. Date Recorded: 12/18/17
"P10.Survey Type:(Describe)
IntensivePedestrian
*P11. Report Citation:(Citesurveyreportand other sources,orenter"none.”) Cultural Resources Assessment for the L'Aquila Rancho Belago Residential Development Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA.Tierra Environmental Services, January 2018 *Attachments: _x_ Loc Map ___ ContinuationSheet Building,Structure,Object _X_ ArchaeologicalRecord District Record ___ LinearFeature x MillingStation ___ RockArt ___ ArtifactRecord __ PhotoRecord _X_ Sketch DPR 523A(9/2013) *Required information 1467
Stilt of Callfomla • The Reaourcea Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
3-28083
CA-RIV- 1 2 6 8 o
Page _2 __ of 5 *Resource Name or# TES-MV-003 (MV3)
*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: _2018 __ _ DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information
State

DEPARTMENT
of California
OF
- PARKS
The Resources
ANDRECREATION Ageney HRI# Peiraary # 33-28 683
LOCATIONMAP Tiomial SA_RI\/-12 6 80

*Map Name: Sunnymead *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: __2018 Fn
=<=
\,
= we Aen sendasuasan
DPR523J (9/2013) * Required information
1468
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD
Primary#
Trinomial

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 5 m. (n/s) >< b. Width: 1.9 m. (e/w) CA-R"/-
Method of Measurement: □ Paced ■Taped □ Visual estimate □ Other: GPS 2 Method of Determination (Check any that apply.): □ Artifacts ■ Features □ Soil □ Vegetation □ Topography □ Cut bank □ Animal burrow □ Excavation □ Property boundary □ Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: ■ High □ Medium □ Low Explain:

Limitations (Check any that apply): □ Restricted access □ Paved/built over □ Site limits incompletely defined □ Disturbances □ Vegetation □ Other (Explain):

A2. Depth: □ None ■ Unknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: □ Present □ Absent □ Possible ■ Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder with a single milling slick. *AS. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? ■ No □ Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: ■Good □ Fair □Poor (Describe disturbances.): There are minimal disturbances and the site is in good condition.
*AS. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): unnamed blueline 150 meters NNE *A9. Elevation: 1640 AMSL
AlO. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located on a gentle slope facing east among a community of Riversidean sage scrub and granitic boulders.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: ■ Prehistoric □ Protohistoric □ 1542-1769 □ 1769-1848 □ 1848-1880 □ 1880-1914 □ 1914-1945 □ Post 1945 □ Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al4. Remarks:

A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

Al 6. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Prepared by: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C / San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
State of California— Natural ResourcesAgency Primary # a 3 =A g 1) 8 3 DEPARTMENT OF PARKSAND RECREATION Trinomial
ARCHAEOLOGICALSITERECORD CA-RIV- 12480

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length: 5m. (n/s)x b. Width: 1.9 m. (e/w) Method of Measurement: [Paced BTaped [I Visualestimate [J Other: GPS Method of Determination (Check anythat apply.):0 Artifacts B Features [0 Soil [J Vegetation [0 Topography 0 Cut bank [0 Animal burrow [OOExcavation [0 Property boundary [1Other (Explain):

Reliability of Determination: BMHigh [Medium [Low Explain:

Limitations (Check anythat apply): [J Restricted access [J Paved/built over [1Sitelimits incompletely defined 0 Disturbances [J Vegetation [J Other(Explain):

A2. Depth: OO None BEUnknown Method of Determination:
*A3. Human Remains: [J Present [J Absent [J Possible B Unknown (Explain): Unlikely *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): A single granitic boulder with a single milling slick. *AS. Cultural Constituents {Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.):

No associated artifacts were observed.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? B No [1 Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.)
*A7. Site Condition: BGood [Fair [Poor (Describe disturbances.): There are minimal disturbances and the site is in good condition.
*A8. NearestWater (Type,distance,and direction.): unnamedblueline150 meters NNE *A9. Elevation: 1640 AMSL
A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): Located on a gentle slope facing east among a community of Riversidean sage scrub and granitic boulders.

All. Historical Information:
*A12. Age: B Prehistoric [1Protohistoric [11542-1769 [J 1769-1848 [11848-1880 [11880-1914 [11914-1945 O Post 1945 [Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known:

A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function(s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations):

Al14. Remarks:

A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):

A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.):

Original Media/Negatives Kept at: Tierra Environmental Services *A17. Form Preparedby: H. Murphy Date: 1/5/18
Affiliation and Address: Tierra Environmental Services / 9915 Businesspark Ave., Ste. C/ San Diego, CA 92131 *Required information
DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
1469
Stitt of Callfomla � The R11ourc11 Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

SKETCH MAP

*Drawn by: HMurphy
Primary#
HRI#
Trlnomlal
33 28083
CA-RIV- 1 2 6 8 O
*Resource Name or# TES-MV-003
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE: Include bar scale and north arrow.

Stateof California ® TheResourcesAgency

DEPARTMENTOFPARKSANDRECREATION

SKETCHMAP
e—Q prmery# J8~28G¢83
Trinomial CA-RIV- 12680

*Drawn by: HMurphy
TES-MV-00
ic PC Y
*Resource Name or # TES-MV-003
*Date of map: 2018
DPR 523K (9/2013) NOTE:Include bar scale and north arrow. 1470
State of California -Natural Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

MILLING STATION RECORD
Primary#
Trinomial CA-RIV- 1 2 6 8 o

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger
Feature
1 Feature
#
1 Outcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation
Sm N/S
Milling
Surface#
1 x 1.90m E/W
X
X
X
X
Type Length Width
(cm) (cm)
MS 26 N/S 15 E/W
Type Key:

PM Possible mortar
MS Milling slick
x Height
x Height
x Height
x Height
x Height
Depth
(cm)
0 CO Conical mortar
OM Oval mortar
SM Saucer mortar
Other:

BM Basin milling feature
DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
Date: 12/18/18
Bedrock Type and Condition

1.25m h Granitic
Contents Remarks
0 East facing
Contents Key:

S Filled with soil
L Filled with leaves
U Unexcavated
Other:

R Contains rock
P Contains pestle
M Contains mano
NOTE: Attach plan(s) of milling stations.
£) 0 QOH Nan 0
State of California— Natural Resources Agency Primary # yu “ke VU JI DEPARTMENTOFPARKSAND RECREATION Trinomial
MILLING STATION RECORD CA-RIV-12680

Form Prepared by: B. Bolger Date: 12/18/18
Feature OQutcrop Dimensions (m) and Orientation Bedrock Type and Condition 1 5mN/S x 1.90mE/W x Height 1.25mh Granitic
X x Height
X x Height
X x Height
X x Height
Feature Milling Type | length | Width Depth Contents Remarks # Surface # (cm) (cm) (cm)
1 1 MS 26N/S | 15E/W | O 0 Eastfacing
Type Key: Contents Key:

CO Conicalmortar PM Possiblemortar S Filledwithsoil R Contains rock OM Ovalmortar MS Millingslick L Filledwithleaves P Contains pestle SM Saucermortar BM Basinmillingfeature U Unexcavated M Contains mano Other: Other:

NOTE:Attachplan(s)of millingstations.

DPR 523F (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015)
1471
Appendix C:

NAHC
Outreach
Appendix C:

NAHC
Outreach
1472
Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search Project: Cactus Moreno Valley Project
County: Riverside
USGS Quadrangle Name: Sunnymead
Township 3S Range: 3W Section(s): 14
Company/Firm/Agency: Material Culture Consulting, Inc.

Street Address: 2701-B N. Towne Ave
City: Pomona Zip: 91767
Phone: 626-205-8279
Fax: 626-249-0479
Email: [email protected]
Project Description:

The Project proposes the construction of a residential development in Moreno Valley, Riverside County. Please see the attached map for more details on the project location.

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 — Fax
[email protected]
InformationBelow is Requiredfor a SacredLandsFile Search Project: Cactus Moreno Valley Project
County: Riverside
USGS QuadrangleName: Sunnymead
Township 3S Range: 3W Section(s): 14
Company/Firm/Agency: Material CultureConsulting,Inc.

Street Address: 2701-B N. Towne Ave
City:_ Pomona Zip: 91767
Phone: 626-205-8279
Fax:__ 626-249-0479
Email: [email protected]
Project Description:

The Project proposes the construction of a residential developmentin Moreno Valley, Riverside County. Please see the attachedmap for more details on the project location. 1473
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
¯
1:24,000
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
0 0.25 0.5 1
Kilometers
USGS 7.5' Quad: Sunnymead
Project Area
Project Location
\ oll aol - ap Tg a e @ © 8
] kA
; a
[J
: : .
o he Walle i oe EX
So a \ [ ." oe) \, ; SS $8 buna
3 4 ®
'%e H
i ] or .
= : - -— —
[~ . 4
LJ o [] | “9
1 [J
[1 - de Te 3
= ~% \
[] ra ~ ~ \,
"x iN »”
semmesas S4¢
CEpiiopesssssnnsa C—3 bs
-— .. LJ
Project Location
1:24,000
. A ~~ TG J a i . : Nem = —_——

2.11 48 == od RS hE ~= Ys INE Ae % on 4
it / H
el NY ) Oe Ad / Lr o hd AN . is ZF 2
TTT S——
} Ey any 4 A 1“
NN . ) { 4 i
“ae 1544 SN Ne al na AN Rs ~~ny 2 | 2 i (A
—-, pu! vd
* [J K 3 Q. 7
hs
2 1] :
0 LJ Nooo * lig (0) s ) ~ S$ @ or
A { [=] « be H
Pe. . |, . . ; 9
Ry TA | PS or , nM y ? i AN - «= Xi USGS 7 51Quad: Synhymead,Sl ¥ H E g rN I ’
0 0.25 0.5 1
LC e— [VMN INL
[1] Project Area EE EEE Kilometers ~~
0 02 05 1 MATERIAL CULTURE

CONSULTING
1474
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

January 6, 2021
Tria Belcourt
Material Culture Consulting, Inc.

Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County
Dear Ms. Belcourt:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luiseño

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
Marshall McKay
Wintun

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie TumamaitStenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

CHAIRPERSON
Lavra Miranda
Luisefo

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luisefo
PARLIAMENTARIAN Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
Marshall McKay
Wintun

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute /White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie TumamaitStenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVESECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(216) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
January 6, 2021
Tria Belcourt
Material Culture Consulting, Inc.

Via Email fo: [email protected]
Re: Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County
Dear Ms. Belcourt:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File {SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. | suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Onder rem.

Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

1475
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6800
Fax: (760) 699-6919
Cahuilla
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6907
Fax: (760) 699-6924
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Augustine Band of Cahuilla
Mission Indians
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
P.O. Box 846
Coachella, CA, 92236
Phone: (760) 398 - 4722
Fax: (760) 369-7161
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cabazon Band of Mission
Indians
Doug Welmas, Chairperson
84-245 Indio Springs Parkway
Indio, CA, 92203
Phone: (760) 342 - 2593
Fax: (760) 347-7880
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
52701 U.S. Highway 371
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 5549
Fax: (951) 763-2808
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla
and Cupeño Indians
Shane Chapparosa, Chairperson
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA, 92086-0189
Phone: (760) 782 - 0711
Fax: (760) 782-0712
Cahuilla
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Robert Martin, Chairperson
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 849 - 8807
Fax: (951) 922-8146
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Denisa Torres, Cultural Resources
Manager
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 849 - 8807
Fax: (951) 922-8146
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula
Rd.

Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
Cupeno
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources
Coordinator
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6306
Fax: (951) 506-9491
[email protected]
Luiseno
1 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson
5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6800
Fax: (760) 699-6919
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director
5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6907
Fax: (760) 699-6924
[email protected]
Augustine Band of Cahuilla
Mission Indians
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
P.O. Box 846 Cahuilla
Coachella, CA, 92236
Phone: (760) 398 - 4722
Fax: (760) 369-7161
[email protected]
Cabazon Band of Mission
Indians
Doug Welmas, Chairperson
84-245 Indio Springs Parkway Cahuilla
Indio, CA, 92203
Phone: (760) 342 - 2593
Fax: (760) 347-7880
[email protected]
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
52701 U.S. Highway 371 Cahuilla
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 5549
Fax: (951) 763-2808
[email protected]
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla
and Cupeno Indians
Shane Chapparosa, Chairperson
P.O. Box 189 Cahuilla
Warner Springs, CA, 92086-0189
Phone: (760) 782 - 0711
Fax: (760) 782-0712
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Robert Martin, Chairperson
12700 Pumarra Road Cahuilla
Banning, CA, 92220 Serrano
Phone: (951) 849 - 8807
Fax: (951) 922-8146
[email protected]
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Denisa Torres, Cultural Resources
Manager
12700 Pumarra Road Cahuilla
Banning, CA, 92220 Serrano
Phone: (951) 849 - 8807
Fax: (951) 922-8146
[email protected]
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Cupeno
Rd. Luiseno
Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources
Coordinator
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6306
Fax: (951) 506-9491
[email protected]
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM 1of3
1476
Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Luiseno
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Jill McCormick, Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (760) 572 - 2423
historicpreservation@quechantrib
e.com
Quechan
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Manfred Scott, Acting Chairman
Kw'ts'an Cultural Committee
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (928) 750 - 2516
[email protected]
Quechan
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
John Gomez, Environmental
Coordinator
P. O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson
P.O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 1051
Fax: (760) 749-5144
[email protected]
Luiseno
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
Luiseno
San Manuel Band of Mission
Indians
Jessica Mauck, Director of
Cultural Resources
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA, 92346
Phone: (909) 864 - 8933
[email protected]
Serrano
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Scott Cozart, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92583
Phone: (951) 654 - 2765
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
2 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Jill McCormick, Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 1899 Quechan
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (760) 572 - 2423
historicpreservation@quechantrib
e.com
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Manfred Scott, Acting Chairman
Kw'ts'an Cultural Committee
P.O. Box 1899 Quechan
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (928) 750 - 2516
[email protected]
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
John Gomez, Environmental
Coordinator
P. O. Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson
P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane Luiseno
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 1051
Fax: (760) 749-5144
[email protected]
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane Luiseno
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
San ManuelBand of Mission
Indians
Jessica Mauck, Director of
Cultural Resources
26569 Community Center Drive Serrano
Highland, CA, 92346
Phone: (909) 864 - 8933
[email protected]
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820 Cahuilla
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Scott Cozart, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487 Cahuilla
San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Luiseno
Phone: (951) 654 - 2765
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM 20of3
1477
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
Michael Mirelez, Cultural
Resource Coordinator
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA, 92274
Phone: (760) 399 - 0022
Fax: (760) 397-8146
[email protected]
Cahuilla
3 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
Michael Mirelez, Cultural
Resource Coordinator
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA, 92274
Phone: (760) 399 - 0022
Fax: (760) 397-8146
[email protected]
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Riverside County
1/6/2021
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Cahuilla
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cactus Moreno Valley Project, Riverside County.

PROJ-2021-
000077
01/06/2021 01:29 PM 3of3
1478
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Phone
call
placed
on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

N/A See below. See below.

Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

N/A On February 10,
2021, MCC received
a response from
Lacy Padilla,
Archaeologist for
the Agua Caliente
Band of Cahuilla
Indians (ACBCI) via
email. Ms. Padilla
stated that the
Project Area is not
located within the
boundaries of the
ACBCI Reservation,
but it is within the
Tribes Traditional
Use Area. The

ACBCI THPO
requested a
number of
procedures be
conducted. See
letter for further
details
MCC
thanked Ms.

Padilla and
the
response
will be
included in
the report.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

email. Ms. Padilla
stated that the
Project Area is not
located within the
boundaries of the
ACBCI Reservation,
but it is within the
Tribes Traditional
Use Area. The

ACBCITHPO
requested a
number of
procedures be
conducted. See
letter for further
details
and 1 2m Respo
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
Contact | Attempt
Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson Letter Phone N/A See below. See below.

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla sentvia | call
Indians USPSon | placed
5401 Dinah Shore Drive January | on Palm Springs, CA, 92264 7,2021 | February by EM. 3,2021
by EM.

Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director Letter Email N/A On February 10, MCC Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla sentvia | senton 2021, MCCreceived | thanked Ms.

Indians USPSon | February a response from Padilla and
5401 Dinah Shore Drive January | 3,2021 Lacy Padilla, the Palm Springs, CA, 92264 7,2021 | by EM. Archaeologist for response by EM. the Agua Caliente will be
Band of Cahuilla included in
Indians (ACBCI) via the report.
1479
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission
Indians
P.O. Box 846
Coachella, CA, 92236
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021.

On February 17,
2021, MCC received
an email with an
attached letter
from Jacobia
Kirksey, Tribal
Executive Assistant
for Augustine Band
of Cahuilla Indians.

The letter stated at
this time, the tribe
is unaware of
specific cultural
resources that may
be affected by the
proposed project,
however in the
event, any cultural
resources are
discovered during
the development of
the project please
contact the tribe
immediately.

MCC
thanked Ms.

Kirksey for
her
response
and will
include it in
the final
report.

Doug Welmas, Chairperson
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
85-245 Indio Springs Parkway
Indio CA, 92203
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021.

As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

by EM.
and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
—aemmgiiine.,, | Contact | Attempt | Attempt
Amanda Vance, Chairperson Letter Email Call On February 17, MCC Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission sentvia | senton placed 2021, MCCreceived | thanked Ms.

Indians USPSon | February | on an email with an Kirksey for P.O. Box 846 January | 3,2021 February attached letter her Coachella, CA, 92236 7,2021 by EM. 17,2021. . response
by EM. from Jacobia and will
Kirksey, Tribal include it in
Executive Assistant | the final
for Augustine Band | report.
of Cahuilla Indians.

The letter stated at
this time, the tribe
is unaware of
specific cultural
resources that may
be affected by the
proposed project,
however in the
event, any cultural
resources are
discovered during
the development of
the project please
contact the tribe
immediately.

Doug Welmas, Chairperson Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians sentvia | senton placed MCC has not 85-245 Indio Springs Parkway USPSon | February | on received a response Indio CA, 92203 January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe. 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021.
1480
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
Cahuilla Band of Indians
52701 U.S. Highway 371
Anza CA, 92539
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.
n/a n/a On January 28,
2021, MCC received
a response from
BobbyRay Esparza,
Cultural
Coordinator, stating
“We do not have
knowledge of any
cultural resources
within or near the
project area.

Although this
project is outside
the Cahuilla
reservation
boundary It is
located within the
Cahuilla traditional
land use area.

Therefore, we do
have an interest in
this project. We
believe that cultural
resources may be
unearthed during
construction. We
request that a tribal
monitor from
Cahuilla be present
for all ground
disturbing activities
and to be notified
of all updates with
the project moving
forward.”
MCC will
include
response in
final report.

Shane Chapparosa, Chairperson
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and
Cupeño Indians
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA,92086-0189
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Phone
call place
on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
At this tribe, the
tribe does not wish
to comment.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
Cahuilla Band of Indians
52701U.S. Highway 371
Anza CA,92539
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
1st
Follow
Up
AGC
Letter
sent via
USPSon
January
7,2021
by EM.
n/a
2nd
FollowUp
n/a
pr — I
On January 28,
2021, MCC received
a response from
BobbyRay Esparza,
Cultural
Coordinator, stating
“We do not have
knowledge of any
cultural resources within or near the
project area. Although this
project is outside
the Cahuilla
reservation
boundary lt is
located within the
Cahuilla traditional
land use area. Therefore, we do
have an interest in
this project. We
believe that cultural
resources may be
unearthed during
construction. We
request that a tribal
monitor from
Cahuilla be present
for all ground
disturbing activities
and to be notified
of all updates with
the project moving
forward.”
MCC will
include
response in
final report.

Shane Chapparosa, Chairperson
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and
Cupeiio Indians
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA,92086-0189
Letter
sent via
USPSon
January
7,2021
by EM.

Phone
call place
on
February
3,2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
At this tribe, the
tribe does not wish
to comment.
1481
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Denisa Torres, Cultural Resources
Manager
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA,92220
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Robert Martin, Chairperson
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA,92220
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Shasta Gaughen
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Pala Band of Mission Indians
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd.

Pala, CA 92059
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Paul Macarro
Cultural Resource Coordinator
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA 92593
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Mark Macarro, Chairperson Pechanga
Band of Luiseno Indians
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA 92593
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Manfred Scott, Acting
Chairman
Kw’ts’an Cultural Committee
Quechan Tribe of the Fort
Yuma Reservation
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a See below See below
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Yuma, AZ,85366
and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
“J. | Contact | Attempt | Attempt
Denisa Torres, Cultural Resources Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021, Manager sentvia | senton placed MCC has not
Morongo Band of Mission Indians USPSon | February | on received a response 12700 Pumarra Road January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe.

Banning, CA,92220 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
by EM.

Robert Martin, Chairperson Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021, Morongo Band of Mission Indians sentvia | senton placed MCC has not 12700 Pumarra Road USPSon | February | on received a response Banning, CA,92220 January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe. 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
by EM.

Shasta Gaughen Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021,
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer sentvia | senton placed MCC has not Pala Band of Mission Indians USPSon | February | on received a response PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe.

Pala, CA92059 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
by EM.

Paul Macarro Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021,
Cultural Resource Coordinator sentvia | senton placed MCC has not Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians USPSon | February | on received a response P.O. Box 1477 January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe.

Temecula, CA92593 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
by EM.

Mark Macarro, Chairperson Pechanga | Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021, Band of Luiseno Indians sentvia | senton placed MCC has not P.O. Box 1477 USPSon | February | on received a response Temecula, CA 92593 January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe. 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
by EM.

Manfred Scott, Acting Letter Email n/a See below See below Chairman sentvia | senton
Kw’ts’an Cultural Committee USPSon | February
Quechan Tribe of the Fort January | 3,2021
Yuma Reservation 7,2021 | by EM.

P.O. Box 1899 by EM.
1482
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Jill McCormick, Historic Preservation
Officer
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a On January 14,
2021, MCC received
a response from H.

Jill McCormick
stating, “we do not
wish to comment
on this project.

We defer to the
more local Tribe(s)
and support their
decisions on the
project.”
MCC
thanked Ms.

McCormick
for her
response
and will
include it in
the final
report.

Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
P. O. Box 391670
Anza, CA,92539
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
MCC spoke to Kay,
Tribal Secretary,
who informed us at
this time, the tribe
does not have any
information they
wish to share.

MCC will
include
response in
final report.

John Gomez, Environmental
Coordinator
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
P.O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a See above. See above.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

by EM.
and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
dil, | Contact | Attempt | Aianleti
Jill McCormick, Historic Preservation Letter Email n/a On January 14, MCC Officer sentvia | senton 2021, MCCreceived | thanked Ms.

Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma USPSon | February a response from H. McCormick Reservation January | 3,2021 Jill McCormick for her
P.O. Box 1899 7,2021 | by EM. stating, “we do not | response Yuma, AZ, 85366 by EM. wish to comment and will on this project. include it in We defer to the the final
more local Tribe(s) report.
and support their
decisions on the
project.”
Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson Letter Email Call MCC spoke to Kay, MCC will Ramona Band of Cahuilla sentvia | senton placed Tribal Secretary, include P. O. Box 391670 USPSon | February | on who informed us at | response in Anza, CA,92539 January | 3,2021 February | this time, the tribe final report. 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021 does not have any
by EM. information they
wish to share.

John Gomez, Environmental Letter Email n/a See above. See above.

Coordinator sentvia | senton
Ramona Band of Cahuilla USPSon | February
P.O. Box 391670 January | 3,2021
Anza, CA, 92539 7,2021 | by EM.
1483
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA 92082
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

N/A N/A On January 20,
2021, email with
letter attachment
from Cheryl
Madrigal, Tribal
Historic
Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources
Manager: The
Project Area is
located within the
Traditional Use
Area (TUA) of the
Luiseño and within
the Tribe’s specific
Area of Historic
Interest (AHI).

Although no known
knowledge of
cultural resources
are located within
the Project Area,
the Tribe
recommends that
an archaeological
records search be
conducted and the
Tribe asks for a
copy of the results
to be provided to
them.

MCC will
include
response in
final report.

Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Office
One Government Center Dr.

Valley Center, CA 92082
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a See above.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

by EM.
and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
dM. Contact | Aigmpt
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson Letter N/A N/A On January 20, MCC will Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians sent via 2021, email with include One Government Center Lane USPSon letter attachment response in Valley Center, CA 92082 January from Cheryl final report. 7,2021 Madrigal, Tribal
by EM. Historic
Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources
Manager: The
Project Area is
located within the
Traditional Use
Area (TUA) of the
Luisefio and within
the Tribe's specific
Area of Historic
Interest (AHI).

Although no known
knowledge of
cultural resources are located within
the Project Area,
the Tribe
recommends that an archaeological
records search be
conducted and the
Tribe asks for a
copy of the results
to be provided to
them.

Letter Email n/a See above.

Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic sentvia | senton
Preservation Office USPSon | February
One Government Center Dr. January | 3,2021
Valley Center, CA 92082 7,2021 | by EM.
1484
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Jessica Mauck, Director of Cultural
Resources, San Manuel Band of
Mission Indians
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA 92346
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a On January 15,
2021, email from
Ryan Nordness,
Cultural Resource
Analyst, which
stated that the
Project Area exists
within Serrano
ancestral territory
and is of interest to
the tribe. While no
major concerns
with the current
Project’s
implementation,
they have
requested certain
language to be
included in the
project/permit/plan
conditions.

MCC will
include
response in
final report.

Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair, Santa
Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
Spoke to Tribal
Secretary who
asked project
information to be
forwarded to
Vanessa Minott. As
of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Scott Cozart, Chairperson
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA,92583
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.
n/a See below.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

by EM.
and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
smn... | Contact | Attempt
JessicaMauck, Director of Cultural Letter Email n/a On January15, MCC will Resources, San Manuel Band of sentvia | senton 2021, email from include Mission Indians USPSon | February Ryan Nordness, response in 26569 Community Center Drive January | 3,2021 Cultural Resource final report.

Highland, CA 92346 7,2021 | by EM. Analyst, which
by EM. stated that the
Project Area exists
within Serrano
ancestral territory
and is of interest to
the tribe. While no major concerns with the current
Project's
implementation,
they have
requested certain
language to be
included in the
project/permit/plan
conditions.

Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair, Santa Letter Email Call Spoke to Tribal Rosa Band of Cahuilla sentvia | senton placed Secretary who Indians P.O. Box 391820 USPSon | February | on asked project Anza, CA, 92539 January | 3,2021 February | information to be 7,2021 by EM. 17,2021 forwarded to
by EM. Vanessa Minott. As
of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

Scott Cozart, Chairperson Letter Email n/a See below.

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians sentvia | senton
P. O. Box 487 USPSon | February
San Jacinto, CA,92583 January | 3,2021
7,2021 | by EM.
1485
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource
Department
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA,92583
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
Mr. Ontiveros
stated on the
phone, the Project
Area falls within
Traditional Use
Area, and is
concerned with
cultural resources
being discovered
during
construction. The
tribe requests AB52
consultation.

MCC
thanked Mr.

Ontiveros
and will
include the
response in
the final
report.

Michael Mirelez, Cultural Resource
Coordinator
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA,92274
Letter
sent via
USPS on
January
7, 2021
by EM.

Email
sent on
February
3, 2021
by EM.

Call
placed
on
February
17,2021
As of May 28, 2021,
MCC has not
received a response
from the tribe.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
June 2021

and 1 2m
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
ee WY Contact | Attempt | Attempt
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Letter Email Call Mr. Ontiveros MCC Department sentvia | senton placed stated on the thanked Mr.

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians USPSon | February | on phone, the Project Ontiveros P. O. Box 487 January | 3,2021 February | Area falls within and will San Jacinto, CA,92583 7,2021 by EM. 17,2021 Traditional Use include the by EM. Area, and is response in
concerned with the final
cultural resources report.
being discovered
during
construction. The
tribe requests AB52
consultation.

Michael Mirelez, Cultural Resource Letter Email Call As of May 28, 2021, Coordinator sentvia | senton placed MCC has not
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla USPSon | February | on received a response Indians January | 3,2021 February | from the tribe.

P.O. Box 1160 7,2021 | by EM. 17,2021
Thermal, CA,92274 by EM.
1486
Dear Ms. Julia Carvajal,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the EPD Cactus project. The project area is not located within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation. However, it is within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. For this reason, the ACBCI THPO requests the following:
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
Material Culture Consulting
Ms. Julia Carvajal
2701-B North Towne Avenue
Pomona, California 91767
February 10, 2021
Re: EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project
Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6956. You may also email me at [email protected].

Cordially,
Lacy Padilla
Archaeologist
Tribal Historic Preservation Office

AGUA CALIENTE BAND

OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
03-024-2021-001
0 *A cultural resources inventory of the project area by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area.
0 *A copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center.
0 *Copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project.

AGUA CALIENTE BAND Of CAHUILLA INDIANS

TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION
03-024-2021-001 February 10, 2021
[VIAEMAIL TO:[email protected]]
Material Culture Consulting
Ms. Julia Carvajal
2701-B North Towne Avenue
Pomona, California 91767
Re: EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project
Dear Ms. Julia Carvajal,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in theEPD Cactusproject. The project areais not located within the boundaries of the ACBCIReservation. However, it is within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. For this reason,the ACBCI THPO requests the following:
*A culturalresourcesinventory of theproject areaby a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area.
*A copy of therecords searchwith associatedsurveyreports andsiterecords from the information center.
*Copies of any culturalresource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project.

Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage.If youhave questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6956. Youmay also email me at [email protected].

Cordially,
AL
Lacy Padilla
Archaeologist
Tribal Historic Preservation Office

AGUA CALIENTEBAND

OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
540) DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM SPRINGS, CA 922284
T 760/5900/6800 F FEC/850/6024 WWW. AGUACALIENTE-NEBN.GOV 1487

AUGUSTINE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
PO Box 846 84-481 Avenue 54 Coachella CA 92236
Telephone: (760) 398-4722
Fax (760) 369-7161
Tribal Chairperson: Amanda Vance
Tribal Vice-Chairperson: William Vance
Tribal Secretary: Victoria Martin
Date: February 17th, 2021
RE: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Dear: Tracy A. Stropes, M.A., RPA
Senior Project Archaeologist
Thank you for the opportunity to offer input concerning the development of the above-identified project. We appreciate your sensitivity to the cultural resources that may be impacted by your project and the importance of these cultural resources to the Native American peoples that have occupied the land surrounding the area of your project for thousands of years. Unfortunately, increased development and lack of sensitivity to cultural resources have resulted in many significant cultural resources being destroyed or substantially altered and impacted. Your invitation to consult on this project is greatly appreciated.

At this time, we are unaware of specific cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project, however, in the event, you should discover any cultural resources during the development of this project please contact our office immediately for further evaluation.

Very truly yours,
Victoria Martin, Tribal Secretary
Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians

AUGUSTINE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
PO Box 846 84-481 Avenue 54 Coachella CA 92236
Telephone: (760) 398-4722
Fax (760) 369-7161
Tribal Chairperson: Amanda Vance
Tribal Vice-Chairperson: William Vance
Tribal Secretary: Victoria Martin
Date: February 17th, 2021
RE: ProposedEPD CactusMoreno Valley Project, City ofMoreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Dear: Tracy A. Stropes,M.A., RPA
SeniorProject Archaeologist
Thank you for the opportunity to offer input concerning the development of the above-identified project. We appreciate your sensitivity to the culturalresources that may be impactedby your project and the importance of theseculturalresources to theNative Americanpeoples that have occupied the land surrounding the areaof your project for thousands of years. Unfortunately, increaseddevelopment and lack of sensitivity to cultural resourceshave resulted in many significant cultural resourcesbeing destroyedor substantially altered and impacted. Your invitation to consult on this project is greatly appreciated.

At this time, we areunaware of specific cultural resources that may be affectedby the proposed project, however, in the event, you should discover any cultural resources during the development of this project please contact our office immediately for further evaluation.

Very truly yours,
Veotpra Waitin
Victoria Martin, Tribal Secretary
Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians
1488
Erika McMullin <[email protected]>
RE: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project
BobbyRay Esparza <[email protected]> Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:04 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Erika McMullin <[email protected]>, anthony madrigal <[email protected]>
Good Afternoon,
The Cahuilla Band of Indians received your letter regarding the above project located in the City of Moreno Valley Riverside County, Ca. We do not have knowledge of any cultural resources within or near the project area. Although this project is outside the Cahuilla reservation boundary It is located within the Cahuilla traditional land use area. Therefore, we do have an interest in this project. We believe that cultural resources may be unearthed during construction. We request that a tribal monitor from Cahuilla be present for all ground disturbing activities and to be notified of all updates with the project moving forward. The Cahuilla Band appreciates your assistance with preserving Tribal Cultural Resources in your project.

Respectfully,
BobbyRay Esparza
Cultural Coordinator
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Cell: (760)423-2773
Office: (951)763-5549
Fax:(951)763-2808
+ M Gmail Erika McMullin <[email protected]> RE: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project
BobbyRay Esparza <[email protected]> Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:04 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: Erika McMullin <[email protected]>, anthony madrigal <[email protected]>
Good Afternoon,
The Cahuilla Band of Indians received your letter regarding the above project located in the City of Moreno Valley Riverside County, Ca. We do not have knowledge of any cultural resources within or near the project area. Although this project is outside the Cahuilla reservation boundary It is located within the Cahuilla traditional land use area. Therefore, we do have an interest in this project. We believe that cultural resources may be unearthed during construction. We request that a tribal monitor from Cahuilla be present for all ground disturbing activities and to be notified of all updates with the project moving forward. The Cahuilla Band appreciates your assistance with preserving Tribal Cultural Resources in your project.

Respectfully,
BobbyRay Esparza
Cultural Coordinator
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Cell: (760)423-2773
Office: (951)763-5549
Fax:(951)763-2808
1489
Erika McMullin <[email protected]>
FW: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley 2 messages
Quechan Historic Preservation <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 6:43 AM
To: Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Here is the email I sent for this project on 1/14/21.

From: Quechan Historic Preservation [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley This email is to inform you that we do not wish to comment on this project. We defer to the more local Tribe(s) and support their decisions on the project.

H. Jill McCormick, M.A.

Historic Preservation Officer
Ft. Yuma Quechan Tribe
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ 85366
Office: 760-572-2423
Cell: 928-261-0254
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM + M Gmail Erika McMullin <[email protected]> FW: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley 2 messages
Quechan Historic Preservation <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 2 wa To: Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Here is the email | sent for this project on 1/14/21.

From: Quechan Historic Preservation [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ProposedEPDCactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley This email is to inform you that we do not wish to comment on this project. We defer to the more local Tribe(s) and support their decisions on the project.

H. Jill McCormick, M.A.

Historic Preservation Officer
Ft. Yuma Quechan Tribe
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ 85366
Office: 760-572-2423
Cell: 928-261-0254
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM 1490
To: Quechan Historic Preservation <[email protected]> Thank you so much for forwarding me the response!
[Quoted text hidden]
--
Erika McMullin, B.A.

Cultural Resources Assistant Project Manager
Material Culture Consulting, Inc.
2701-B North Towne Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
Cell: (909)967-8216
www.materialcultureconsulting.com
To: Quechan Historic Preservation <[email protected]> Thank you so much for forwarding me the response!
[Quoted text hidden]
Erika McMullin, B.A.

Cultural Resources Assistant Project Manager
Material Culture Consulting, Inc.
2701-B North Towne Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
Cell: (909)967-8216
www.materialcultureconsulting.com
1491
Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians

CULTURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
One Government Center Lane | Valley Center | CA 92082
(760) 749-1051 | Fax: (760) 749-8901 | rincon-nsn.gov
Bo Mazzetti
Chairman
Tishmall Turner
Vice Chair
Laurie E. Gonzalez
Council Member
John Constantino
Council Member
Joseph Linton
Council Member
January 20, 2021
Sent only via email to: [email protected] Re: EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County Dear Ms. Belcourt,
This letter is written on behalf of the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians (“Rincon Band” or “Band”), a federally recognized Indian Tribe and sovereign government. We have received your notification regarding the above referenced project and we thank you for the opportunity to provide information pertaining to cultural resources. The identified location is within the Traditional Use Area (TUA) of the Luiseño people and within the Band’s specific Area of Historic Interest (AHI). As such, Rincon is traditionally and culturally affiliated to the project area.

We do not have knowledge of cultural resources within the proposed project area. However, this does not mean that none exist. We recommend that an archaeological record search be conducted and ask that a copy of the results be provided to the Rincon Band.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience at (760) 297-2635 or via electronic mail at [email protected]. We look forward to working together to protect and preserve our cultural assets.

Sincerely,
Cheryl Madrigal
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources Manager
Rincon Band of Luisenio Indians

CULTURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
One Government Center Lane | Valley Center | CA 92082
(760) 749-1051 | Fax: (760) 749-8901 | rincon-nsn.gov
January 20, 2021
Sent only via email to: [email protected] Re: EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County Dear Ms. Belcourt,
This letter is written on behalf of the Rincon Band of Luisefio Indians (“Rincon Band” or “Band”), a federally recognized Indian Tribe and sovereign government. We have received your notification regarding the above referencedproject andwe thank you for the opportunity to provide informationpertaining to culturalresources.The identified location is within the Traditional Use Area (TUA) of the Luisefio people and within the Band’s specific Area ofHistoric Interest (AHI). As such,Rincon is traditionally andculturally affiliated to theproject area.

We do not haveknowledge of culturalresourceswithintheproposedproject area.However, this doesnot mean that none exist. We recommend that an archaeologicalrecord searchbe conducted and ask that a copy of the results be provided to the RinconBand.

If you have additional questions or concerns,please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience at (760) 297-2635 or via electronic mailat [email protected]. Welook forwardto workingtogethertoprotect andpreserve our cultural assets.

Sincerely,
Cheryl Madrigal
TribalHistoric Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources Manager
Bo Mazzetti Tishmall Turner ~~ Laurie E. Gonzalez ~~ John Constantino JosephLinton Chairman Vice Chair CouncilMember CouncilMember Council Member 1492
Erika McMullin <[email protected]>
Fwd: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle
Julia Carvajal <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:56 PM
To: sonia <[email protected]>, Tria <[email protected]>, Erika McMullin <[email protected]>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ryan Nordness <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Hey Julia,
Thank you for contacting the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) regarding the above referenced project. SMBMI appreciates the opportunity to review the project documentation, which was received by our Cultural Resources Management Department on January 15, 2021, pursuant to CEQA (as amended, 2015) and CA PRC 21080.3.1. The proposed project area exists within Serrano ancestral territory and, therefore, is of interest to the Tribe. However, due to the nature and location of the proposed project, and given the CRM Department’s present state of knowledge, SMBMI does not have any concerns with the project’s implementation, as planned, at this time. As a result, SMBMI requests that the following language be made a part of the project/permit/plan conditions:

CUL MMs

1. In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

2. If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as + M Gmail Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Fwd: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle
Julia Carvajal <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 15, 2025 To: sonia <[email protected]>, Tria <[email protected]>, Erika McMullin <[email protected]> ———————-Forwarded message ----—--- From: Ryan Nordness <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: Proposed EPD Cactus Moreno Valley Project, City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Hey Julia,
Thank you for contacting the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) regarding the above referenced project. SMBMI appreciates the opportunity to review the project documentation, which was received by our Cultural Resources Management Department on January 15, 2021, pursuant to CEQA (as amended, 2015) and CA PRC 21080.3.1. The proposed project area exists within Serrano ancestral territory and, therefore, is of interest to the Tribe. However, due to the nature and location of the proposed project, and given the CRM Department's present state of knowledge, SMBMI does not have any concerns with the project's implementation, as planned, at this time. As a result, SMBMI requests that the following language be made a part of the project/permit/plan conditions:

CUL MMs

1. In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within TCR-1, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

2. If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as 1493
detailed within TCR-1. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

3. If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

TCR MMs

1. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

2. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project.

Note: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians realizes that there may be additional tribes claiming cultural affiliation to the area; however, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians can only speak for itself.

The Tribe has no objection if the agency, developer, and/or archaeologist wishes to consult with other tribes in addition to SMBMI and if the Lead Agency wishes to revise the conditions to recognize additional tribes.

Please provide the final copy of the project/permit/plan conditions so that SMBMI may review the included language. This communication concludes SMBMI’s input on this project, at this time, and no additional consultation pursuant to CEQA is required unless there is an unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during project implementation. If you should have any further questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience, as I will be your Point of Contact (POC) for SMBMI with respect to this project.

Respectfully,
Ryan Nordness
detailed within TCR-1. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

3. If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

TCR MMs

1. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

2. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project.

Note: San ManuelBand of Mission Indians realizes that there may be additional tribes claiming cultural affiliation to the area; however, San ManuelBand of Mission Indians can only speak for itself.

The Tribe has no objection if the agency, developer, and/or archaeologist wishes to consult with other tribes in addition to SMBMI andif the LeadAgency wishes to revise the conditions to recognize additional tribes.

Please provide the final copy of the project/permit/plan conditions so that SMBMI may review the included language. This communication concludes SMBMI’s input on this project, at this time, and no additional consultation pursuant to CEQA is required unless there is an unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during project implementation. If you should have any further questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience, as | will be your Point of Contact (POC) for SMBMI with respect to this project.

Respectfully,
Ryan Nordness
1494
Ryan Nordness

CULTURAL RESOURCE ANALYST
O: (909) 864-8933 x50-2022
Internal: 50-2022
M: 909-838-4053
26569 Community Center Dr Highland California 92346

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH

IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the sender by reply e-mail so that the email address record can be corrected. Thank You --
Julia Carvajal, M.A.

Cultural Resources Project Manager and GIS Specialist
Material Culture Consulting
2701-B North Towne Avenue
Pomona CA, 91767
Cell: 909-224-7420
www.materialcultureconsulting. com
Ryan Nordness

CULTURAL RESOURCE ANALYST
0: (909) 864-8933 x50-2022
Internal: 50-2022
M: 909-838-4053
26569 Community Center Dr Highland California 92346

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH

IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the sender by reply e-mail so that the email address record can be corrected. Thank You Julia Carvajal, M.A.

Cultural Resources Project Manager and GIS Specialist
Material Culture Consulting
2701-B North Towne Avenue
Pomona CA, 91767
Cell: 909-224-7420
www.materialcultureconsulting. com
1495
Material Culture Consul�ng, Inc. | 2701-B North Towne Avenue Pomona CA 91767 | 626-205-8279 | www.materialcultureconsul�ng.com January 30, 2024
RE: Proposed Belago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Gree�ngs,
Material Culture Consul�ng, Inc (MCC) is conduc�ng the cultural resources review of the expanded Belago Park Project (formerly Cactus Moreno Valley) to support prepara�on of the environmental documents. This leter is to provide an update to the original Project, EPD Cactus Moreno Valley, which occurred in 2021.

The project proposes the construc�on of residen�al development within the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA (see atached map). The update included an addi�onal parcel to the north and surrounding streets. As part of our background research and forthcoming survey, we would like to invite you to share any knowledge of poten�al cultural resources within the project area.

Please note - this request is not part of any formal local, state, or federal consulta�on process, and all requests for consulta�on should be directed to City of Moreno Valley as the Lead CEQA Agency.

Our firm originally contacted the Na�ve American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on December 17, 2020 to request review of the Sacred Lands File and for a list of tribes with tradi�onal lands and/or cultural places within the area. The NAHC responded on January 6, 2021 sta�ng that the Sacred Lands File review resulted in nega�ve results and provided your contact informa�on as part of the list.

MCC sent leters on January 7, 2021 to all 22 contacts, reques�ng any informa�on related to cultural resources or heritage sites within or adjacent to the Project Area. Addi�onal atempts by email or phone call were made on February 3 and February 17, 2021.

We are contac�ng you to see if there are any addi�onal informa�on you would like to share since our last outreach atempt(s).

Project Loca�on and Descrip�on
The Belago Park Project is located in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County. The Project proposes the construc�on of residen�al housing and a city park on undeveloped parcels and road improvements to the surrounding Project Area. The Project is bounded by residen�al housing on Brodiaea Ave. to the north and on Cactus Ave to the south. Undeveloped areas are present east of Redlands Blvd. and west of Wilmont St. The area currently exists as a vacant area with some mowing and off-roading disturbance. A paved flood control runs southwest to northeast through the Project Area. The expanded Project Area includes APN # 478120027 and road improvements adjacent to the Project Area including Cactus Avenue, Brodiaea Avenue, Redlands Boulevard, and Wilmont Street. The area of poten�al impact (API) would encompass approximately 40 acres. Specifically, the proposed Project is located within Sec�on 14 of Township 3 South and Range 3 West USGS 7.5-minute Sunnymead quadrangle (San Bernardino Base Meridian).

Please respond at your earliest convenience if you wish to share any knowledge of cultural resources within or adjacent to the API.

Any informa�on, concerns, or recommenda�ons regarding cultural resources within the API can be shared with the Project Manager Erika McMullin via telephone at 909-967-8216, email at erika@materialcultureconsul�ng.com, or to Archaeologist Hannah Johnston via telephone at 626-840-1797, email at hannah@materialcultureconsul�ng.com. Thank you very much for your assistance.

Kindest regards,
-
Tria Belcourt, M.A., RPA
President and Principal Archaeologist
626-205-8279
tria@materialcultureconsul�ng.com
Pa \
January 30, 2024
L
RE: Proposed Belago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Greetings,
Material Culture Consulting, Inc (MCC) is conducting the cultural resources review of the expanded Belago Park Project (formerly Cactus Moreno Valley) to support preparation of the environmental documents. This letter is to provide an update to the original Project, EPD Cactus Moreno Valley, which occurred in 2021.

The project proposes the construction of residential development within the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, CA (see attached map). The update included an additional parcel to the north and surrounding streets. As part of our background research and forthcoming survey, we would like to invite you to share any knowledge of potential cultural resources within the project area. Please note - this request is not part of any formal local, state, or federal consultation process, and all requests for consultation should be directed to City of Moreno Valley as the Lead CEQA Agency.

Our firm originally contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on December 17, 2020 to request review of the Sacred Lands File and for a list of tribes with traditional lands and/or cultural places within the area. The NAHC responded on January 6, 2021 stating that the Sacred Lands File review resulted in negative results and provided your contact information as part of the list.

MCC sent letters on January 7, 2021 to all 22 contacts, requesting any information related to cultural resources or heritage sites within or adjacent to the Project Area. Additional attempts by email or phone call were made on February 3 and February 17, 2021.

We are contacting you to see if there are any additional information you would like to share since our last outreach attempt(s).

Project Location and Description
The Belago Park Project is located in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County. The Project proposes the construction of residential housing and a city park on undeveloped parcels and road improvements to the surrounding Project Area. The Project is bounded by residential housing on Brodiaea Ave. to the north and on Cactus Ave to the south. Undeveloped areas are present east of Redlands Blvd. and west of Wilmont St. The area currently exists as a vacant area with some mowing and off-roading disturbance. A paved flood control runs southwest to northeast through the Project Area. The expanded Project Area includes APN # 478120027 and road improvements adjacent to the Project Area including Cactus Avenue, Brodiaea Avenue, Redlands Boulevard, and Wilmont Street. The area of potential impact (API) would encompass approximately 40 acres. Specifically, the proposed Project is located within Section 14 of Township 3 South and Range 3 West USGS 7.5-minute Sunnymead quadrangle (San Bernardino Base Meridian).

Please respond at your earliest convenience if you wish to share any knowledge of cultural resources within or adjacent to the API.

Any information, concerns, or recommendations regarding cultural resources within the API can be shared with the Project Manager Erika McMullin via telephone at 909-967-8216, email at [email protected], or to Archaeologist Hannah Johnston via telephone at 626-840-1797, email at [email protected]. Thank you very much for your assistance.

Kindest regards,
co a
Tria Belcourt, M.A., RPA
President and Principal Archaeologist
626-205-8279
[email protected]
Material Culture Consulting, Inc. | 2701-B North Towne Avenue Pomona CA91767 | 626-205-8279 | www.materialcultureconsulting.com 1496
TE. Po
:

Be
> .
ri LY
- IRCCTYET YL
1 ‘a
.

La =m o 09 ~
|1)
ELEY
ELLER
- EME
”» 0.5 0.75
am mm Miles
= 2021 Project Area 0.25
£2) 2024ProjectArea
A
LTURE

CONSULTING
mem msm Kilometers ateriAL cu
EE Road Improvements Additon (2024)

0.5 1.5 2
1:24.000
1497
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Reid D. Milanovich, Chairperson
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
N/A
See below See below
Director of Cultural Resources
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
N/A On Feb 28th, 2024,
Luz Salazar
(Cultural Resources
Analyst from the
Tribal Historic
Preservation Office)
stated that the
Project Area is not
located within the
boundaries of the
ACBCI Reservation,
but it is within the
Tribes Traditional
Use Area. The

ACBCI THPO
requested a
number of policies
be conducted.

MCC
thanked Luz
Salazar and
the
response
will be
included in
the report.

Katie Croft, Cultural Resources
Manager
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA 92264
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
N/A
See above See above
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and
Method
of 1st
Contact
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
2nd
FollowUp
Reid D. Milanovich, Chairperson Mailed Email N/A
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Letter sent on
Indians via USPS| February
5401Dinah Shore Drive on 20, 2024 See below See below
Palm Springs, CA, 92264 January
30th,
2024
Director of Cultural Resources Mailed Email N/A On Feb 28th, 2024, | MCC Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Letter sent on Luz Salazar thanked Luz Indians via USPS| February (Cultural Resources | Salazar and 5401Dinah Shore Drive on 20, 2024 Analyst from the the
Palm Springs, CA, 92264 January Tribal Historic response 30th, Preservation Office) | will be
2024 stated that the included in
Project Area is not the report.
located within the
boundaries of the
ACBCI Reservation,
but it is within the
Tribes Traditional
Use Area. The

ACBCITHPO
requested a
number of policies
be conducted.

Katie Croft, Cultural Resources Mailed Email N/A
Manager Letter sent on Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla via USPS| February Indians on 20, 2024 See above See above
5401Dinah Shore Drive January
Palm Springs, CA 92264 30th,
2024
1498
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission
Indians
P.O. Box 846
Coachella, CA, 92236
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
Spoke to reception
who asked that the
original email be
forwarded to
arios@augustinetri
be.com(sent Mar 1,
2024) Ana Rios
responded on
March 7th stating
at this time they
are unaware of
specific cultural
resources in the
Project Area but in
the event, any are
observed during
the
development of
this project to
reach out
immediately for
further
evaluation.

MCC
thanked Ana
Rios and
stated the
response
will be
included in
the report.

Doug Welmas, Chairperson
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
85-245 Indio Springs Parkway
Indio CA, 92203
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

Erica Schenk, Chairperson
Cahuilla Band of Indians
52701 U.S. Highway 371
Anza CA, 92539
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and 1st Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
Contact | Attempt | Attempt —-— - Amanda Vance, Chairperson Mailed Email Call Spoke to reception MCC Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Letter sent on placed who asked that the | thanked Ana Indians via USPS | February | on original email be Rios and P.O. Box 846 on 20,2024 | March 1, | forwarded to stated the Coachella, CA, 92236 January 2024 arios@augustinetri response 30th, be.com(sent Mar 1, | will be
2024 2024) Ana Rios included in
responded on the report.

March 7th stating
at this time they are unaware of
specific cultural
resources in the
Project Area but in
the event, any are
observed during
the
development of
this project to
reach out
immediately for
further
evaluation.

Doug Welmas, Chairperson Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not is received, 85-245 Indio Springs Parkway via USPS | February | on received a MCC will Indio CA, 92203 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.

Erica Schenk, Chairperson Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Cahuilla Band of Indians Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not is received, 52701U.S. Highway 371 via USPS | February | on received a MCC will Anza CA, 92539 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.
1499
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Ray Chapparosa, Chairperson
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and
Cupeño Indians
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA,92086-0189
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Phone
call
made on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
Discussed via
phone call that they
had no information
to share regarding
that project
MCC
thanked
them and
the
response
will be
included in
the report.

Ann Brierty, THPO
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA,92220
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

Robert Martin, Chairperson
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA,92220
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

Shasta Gaughen
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Pala Band of Mission Indians
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd.

Pala, CA 92059
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and 1st Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up wenn... | Contact | Attempt | Attempt Ray Chapparosa, Chairperson Mailed Phone Call Discussed via MCC Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Letter call placed phone call that they | thanked Cupeiio Indians via USPS | made on | on had no information | them and P.O. Box 189 on February | March 1, | to share regarding the Warner Springs, CA,92086-0189 January | 20,2024 | 2024 that project response 30th, will be
2024 included in
the report.

Ann Brierty, THPO Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Morongo Band of Mission Indians Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not | is received, 12700 Pumarra Road via USPS | February | on received a MCC will Banning, CA,92220 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.

Robert Martin, Chairperson Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Morongo Band of Mission Indians Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not | is received, 12700 Pumarra Road via USPS | February | on received a MCC will Banning, CA,92220 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.

ShastaGaughen Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not is received, Pala Band of Mission Indians via USPS | February | on received a MCC will PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the Pala, CA 92059 January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.
1500
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Paul Macarro, THPO/Director of
Cultural Resources
Cultural Resource Coordinator
Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians
P.O. Box 2183
Temecula, CA 92593
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
n/a On February 20,
2024, MCC received
an email from Mr.

Macarro stating the
Project is located
within the Tribe’s
Ancestral Territory
and it is located
near three
Ancestral
Placenames, SLFs,
and tribal
resources. The
Tribe is interested
in the Project and
requests
consultation with
the Lead Agency.

MCC
thanked the
Tribe for
their
response
and will
include it in
our report.

Additionally,
MCC
reached out
to the
Cultural
Department
to see if the
Tribe is
interested/a
vailable to
participate
in the
survey.

Mark Macarro, Chairperson
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA 92593
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
n/a See above See above
Manfred Scott, Acting
Chairman
Kw’ts’an Cultural Committee
Quechan Tribe of the Fort
Yuma Reservation
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 6,
2024
Spoke with
Manfred Scott on
March 6, 2024 who
stated the tribe had
no comments
regarding this
project and defers
to local tribes
MCC
thanked the
tribe for the
response
and will
include it in
our report
Jordan Joaquin, President Quechan
Tribal Council
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
n/a see above see above
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and 1st Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
BF -. Contact | Attempt
Paul Macarro, THPO/Director of Mailed Email n/a On February 20, MCC Cultural Resources Letter sent on 2024, MCC received | thanked the Cultural Resource Coordinator via USPS| February an email from Mr. Tribe for Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians on 20, 2024 Macarro stating the | their P.O. Box 2183 January Project is located response
Temecula, CA 92593 30th, within the Tribe's and will
2024 Ancestral Territory include it in
and it is located our report. near three Additionally,
Ancestral MCC
Placenames,SLFs, reached out
and tribal to the
resources. The Cultural
Tribe is interested Department
in the Project and to see if the
requests Tribe is
consultation with interested/a
the Lead Agency. vailable to
participate
in the
survey.

Mark Macarro, Chairperson Mailed Email n/a See above See above Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Letter sent on P.O. Box 1477 via USPS| February Temecula, CA 92593 on 20, 2024
January
30th,
2024
Manfred Scott, Acting Mailed Email Call Spoke with MCC
Chairman Letter sent on placed Manfred Scott on thanked the Kw’ts’an Cultural Committee via USPS | February | on March 6, 2024 who | tribe for the Quechan Tribe of the Fort on 20,2024 | March 6, | stated the tribe had | response Yuma Reservation January 2024 no comments and will
P.O. Box 1899 30th, regarding this include it in
Yuma, AZ, 85366 2024 project and defers our report
to local tribes
Jordan Joaquin, President Quechan Mailed Email n/a see above see above Tribal Council Letter sent on Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma via USPS| February Reservation on 20, 2024
P.O. Box 1899 January
Yuma, AZ,85366 30th,
2024
1501
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Danae Hamilton Vega, Chairperson
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
P. O. Box 391670
Anza, CA,92539
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

John Gomez, Environmental
Coordinator
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
P.O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

Cheryl Madrigal, THPO/Cultural
Resource Manager
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
One Government Center Dr.

Valley Center, CA 92082
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Phone
call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and 1st Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
_aenglliiy.. | Contact | Attempt | Attempt
Danae Hamilton Vega, Chairperson Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Ramona Band of Cahuilla Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not is received, P. O. Box 391670 via USPS | February | on received a MCC will Anza, CA,92539 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.

John Gomez, Environmental Mailed Email Call As of March 11, If a response Coordinator Letter sent on placed 2024, MCC has not is received, Ramona Band of Cahuilla via USPS | February | on received a MCC will P.O. Box 391670 on 20,2024 | March 1, | response. forward the Anza, CA, 92539 January 2024 response to
30th, EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.

Mailed Email Phone As of March 11, If a response
Cheryl Madrigal, THPO/Cultural Letter sent on call 2024, MCC has not is received, Resource Manager via USPS| February | placed received a MCC will Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians on 20,2024 | on response. forward the One Government Center Dr. January March 1, response to
Valley Center, CA 92082 30th, 2024 EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.
1502
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Alexandra McCleary, Cultural Lands
Manager
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA 92346
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
n/a n/a On February 2,
2024, MCC received
a response from
Eunice Ambriz,
Cultural Resources
Technician of San
Manual Band of
Mission Indians,
stating the
proposed Project
Area is not sensitive
for cultural
resources.

However, the
proposed project is
located within
Serrano Ancestral
Territory and is
therefore of
interest to the
Tribe. As such, San
Manuel will still
wish to engage in
government-togovernment
consultation
pursuant to AB 52,
should this project
be subject to CEQA
review.

MCC
thanked Ms.

Ambriz for
the
response
and will
include it in
our report.

Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair, Santa
Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Phone
call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and
Method | Follow Followof 1st
Ts Contact
Alexandra McCleary, Cultural Lands Mailed n/a n/a On February 2, MCC Manager Letter 2024, MCCreceived | thanked Ms.

San Manuel Band of Mission Indians via USPS a response from Ambriz for 26569 Community Center Drive on Eunice Ambriz, the
Highland, CA 92346 January Cultural Resources response
30th, Technician of San and will
2024 Manual Band of include it in
Mission Indians, our report.
stating the
proposed Project
Area is not sensitive
for cultural
resources.

However, the
proposed project is
located within
Serrano Ancestral
Territory and is
therefore of
interest to the
Tribe. As such, San
Manuel will still
wish to engage in
government-togovernment
consultation
pursuant to AB 52,
should this project
be subject to CEQA
review.

Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair, Santa Mailed Email Phone As of March 11, If a response Rosa Band of Cahuilla Letter sent on call 2024, MCC has not is received, Indians P.O. Box 391820 via USPS| February | placed received a MCC will Anza, CA, 92539 on 20,2024 | on response. forward the
January March 1, response to
30th, 2024 EPDand the
2024 Lead
Agency.
1503
EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

Name/Affiliation Date
and
Method
of 1st
Contact
Date of
1st
Follow
Up
Attempt
Date of
2nd
FollowUp
Attempt
Results MCC
Response
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA,92583
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
n/a See below See below
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource
Department
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA,92583
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Phone
call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
Mr. Ontiveros
stated the area is
extremely sensitive
and a TCR is located
nearby. The Tribe
wishes to pursue
consultation and
will disclose more
information with
the Lead Agency.

MCC
thanked Mr.

Ontiveros
for his
response
and will
include it in
our report.

Thomas Tortes, Cultural Resource
Coordinator
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA,92274
Mailed
Letter
via USPS
on
January
30th,
2024
Email
sent on
February
20, 2024
Phone
call
placed
on
March 1,
2024
As of March 11,
2024, MCC has not
received a
response.

If a response
is received,
MCC will
forward the
response to
EPD and the
Lead
Agency.

EPD Belago Park Project
CEQA Due Diligence Native American Contact Log
March 2024

and 1 2 Respo
Method | Follow Followof 1st Up Up
Contact | Attempt
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson Mailed Email n/a See below See below Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Letter sent on P. O. Box 487 via USPS| February San Jacinto, CA,92583 on 20,2024
January
30th,
2024
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Mailed Email Phone Mr. Ontiveros MCC Department Letter sent on call stated the area is thanked Mr.

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians via USPS| February | placed extremely sensitive | Ontiveros P. O. Box 487 on 20,2024 | on and a TCR is located | for his San Jacinto, CA,92583 January March 1, | nearby. The Tribe response 30th, 2024 wishes to pursue and will
2024 consultation and include it in
will disclose more our report.
information with
the Lead Agency.

Thomas Tortes, Cultural Resource Mailed Email Phone As of March 11, If a response Coordinator Letter sent on call 2024, MCC has not is received, Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla via USPS| February | placed received a MCC will Indians on 20,2024 | on response. forward the
P.O. Box 1160 January March 1, response to
Thermal, CA,92274 30th, 2024 EPD and the
2024 Lead
Agency.
1504
Dear Ms. Tria Belcourt,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the EPD Cactus project. The project area is not located within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation. However, it is within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. For this reason, the ACBCI THPO requests the following:
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
Material Culture Consulting
Ms. Tria Belcourt
342 Cucamonga Avenue
Claremont, CA 91711
February 28, 2024
Re: Proposed Belago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1137. You may also email me at [email protected].

Cordially,
Luz Salazar
Cultural Resources Analyst
Tribal Historic Preservation Office

AGUA CALIENTE BAND

OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
03-024-2021-001
*A cultural resources inventory of the project area by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area.
*A copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center.
*Copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project.
# * There are Tribal Cultural Resources/sites less than a mile away from the project area.

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
Talpal, HISTONE PRESERVATION
03-024-2021-001 February 28, 2024
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
Material Culture Consulting
Ms. TriaBelcourt
342 CucamongaAvenue
Claremont, CA 91711
Re: ProposedBelago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. TriaBelcourt,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic PreservationOffice (THPO) in theEPD Cactusproject. The project areais not located within the boundaries of the ACBCIReservation. However, it is within the Tribe’s TraditionalUse Area. For this reason, the ACBCI THPO requests the following:
*A culturalresources inventory of theproject areaby a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area.
*A copy of therecords searchwith associatedsurveyreports andsiterecords from the information center.
*Copies of any culturalresource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project.
* There are Tribal Cultural Resources/sites less than a mile away from theproject area.

Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage.If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1137. You may also email me at [email protected].

Cordially,
Luz Salazar
Cultural Resources Analyst
Tribal Historic Preservation Office

AGUA CALIENTE BAND

OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM SPRINGE, CA 92284
T 780/809/6B00 F TEO/A05/8924 WWW. AGUACALIENTE-NSN.CGOV 1505
Augustine BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
84-001 AVENUE 54 COACHELLA, CA 92236 | T: 760-398-4722 F: 760-369-7161 TRIBAL CHAIRPERSON: AMANDA AUGUSTINE TRIBAL TREASURER: William Vance TRIBAL COUNCIL MEMBER: RONNIE VANCE
Date: 03/07/2024
Dear: Tria Belcourt, M.A., RPA
President and Principal Archaeologist
SUBJECT: Proposed Belago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Thank you for the opportunity to offer input concerning the development of the above-identified project. We appreciate your sensitivity to the cultural resources that may be impacted by your project and the importance of these cultural resources to the Native American peoples that have occupied the land surrounding the area of your project for thousands of years. Your invitation to consult on this project is greatly appreciated.

At this time, we are unaware of specific cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project, however, in the event, you should discover any cultural resources during the development of this project please get in touch with our office immediately for further evaluation.

Very truly yours,
Jacobia Kirksey, Tribal Operation Specialist

AUGUSTINE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
84-001 AVENUE 54 COACHELLA, CA 92236 | T: 760-398-4722 F: 760-369-7161 TRIBAL CHAIRPERSON: AMANDA AUGUSTINE TRIBAL TREASURER:WILLIAM VANCE TRIBAL COUNCILMEMBER:RONNIE VANCE
Date: 03/07/2024
Dear: Tria Belcourt, M.A., RPA
President andPrincipal Archaeologist
SUBJECT: ProposedBelago Park Project (formerly EPD Cactus Moreno Valley), City of Moreno Valley; Sunnymead USGS Quadrangle, Riverside County, California.

Thank you for the opportunity to offer input concerning the development of the above-identified project. We appreciate your sensitivity to the cultural resources that may be impacted by your project and the importance of these cultural resources to the Native American peoples that have occupied the land surrounding the area of your project for thousands of years. Your invitation to consult on this project is greatly appreciated.

At this time, we are unaware of specific cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project, however, in the event, you should discover any cultural resources during the development of this project please get in touch with our office immediately for further evaluation.

Very truly yours,
Gd Fiske
JacobiaKirksey, Tribal Operation Specialist
1506
Chairpersont:

Neal Ibanez
PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES Vice Chairperson:

PechangaBandofIndians Bridgett Barcello
Committee Members:

Post Office. Box 2183 + Temecula, CA 92593 Dearlene Miranda Telephone(951) 770-6300 *Fax (951) 506-9491 RichardB. Scearce,III Robert Villalobos
Shevon Torres
JuanRodriguez
Direcctor:

Gary DuBois
Coordinator:

Paul Macarro
February 20, 2024 Cultural Analyst:

Tuba Ebru Ozdil
VIA E-Mail and USPS
Tria Belcourt, M.A., RPA
President and Principal Archaeologist
Material Culture Consulting, Inc.
[email protected]
RE: Request for Information for the Belago Park Project, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Dear Ms. Belcourt,
The Pechanga Band of Indians (“the Tribe”) appreciates your request for information regarding the above referenced Project. After reviewing the provided maps and our internal documents we have determined that the Project area is not within Reservation land's, although it is located in Our Ancestral Territory. At this time, we are interested in participating in this Project based upon Our ‘Ayélkwish/Traditional Knowledge concerning its placement, 2.5-t0-3.85 miles from 3 Ancestral Placenames (places named in the Creation Account, Villages, geographic descriptors, or places of gathering). Additionally, we have 2 Sacred Lands Filing’s for 2 distinct Traditional Cultural Landscapes nearby. This project is 3.98 miles due north of a TCL identified through an analysis for Federal Highway's Mid-County Parkway Project. At 4.77 miles due west a second Landscape was verified for a separate project, by the Army Corps of Engineers. There are in upwards of 34 Ancestral/historical archaeological sites and over 6 recorded Ancestral-features, within 1 mile away from this Projects’-APE. Historic aerial records from 1959-t0-1985 depict a Property which retained its farming activities; however, by 1985 a small rectilinear house/structure appeared at the extreme north-east corner of the Property. Aerials show a roughly 100 yards-by100 yards property-line getting delineated in the northeast-corner, from 1985-to-the present day.

No formal development has followed. The Tribe maintains a majority of the Project's native soils remain intact below the plow-zone. The San Jacinto River once connected a dozen villages along its span in our Ancestral Territory. As evidenced by the upwards of 34 Ancestral features nearby, this region's waterways provided perennial water-sources for our nearby Ancestral Clans.

According to historic aerial records and National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) a blueline feeder for the San Jacinto, cut northeast-to-southwest through this Projects’ APE. Although portions of this feeder are now channeled the very close proximity of this long-term blueline to this Project, is extremely concerning to the Tribe. Given a combination of Our Culture’s burial practices and a close adjacency to long-term water sources often, increases potential impacts to our Ancestor's sacred sites. Because of this Project's nearness to known Ancestral human-remains and ceremonial sites, in view of this Project's placement within hail of 3 Ancestral Placenames, nearby SacredIs TheDuty Trusted Unto Our CareAnd WithHonor WeRise To TheNeed 1507
to 2 Traditional Cultural Landscapes, bearing in mind the adjacent NHD-waterway, considering the close proximity of numerous previously recorded sites and features, and because of longstanding project experience within this Project's vicinity the Tribe therefore, is interested in participating in this Project. Pechanga believes that the possibility of recovering sensitive subsurface resources during ground-disturbing activities for this Project is extremely high.

The Tribe is dedicated to providing comprehensive cultural information to you and your firm for inclusion in the archaeological study as well as to the Lead Agency for CEQA review. At this time, the Tribe requests the following so we may continue the consultation process and to provide adequate and appropriate recommendations for the Project:
1) Notification once the Project begins the entitlement process, if it has not already; 2) Copies of all applicable archaeological reports, site records, proposed grading plans and environmental documents (EA/IS/MND/EIR, etc);
3) Government-to-government consultation with the Lead Agency; and 4) The Tribe believes that monitoring by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and a professional Pechanga Tribal Monitor may be required during earthmoving activities. Therefore, the Tribe reserves its right to make additional comments and recommendations once the environmental documents have been received and fully reviewed.
5) In the event that subsurface cultural resources are identified, the Tribe requests consultation with the Project proponent and Lead Agency regarding the treatment and disposition of all artifacts.

As a Sovereign governmental entity, the Tribe is entitled to appropriate and adequate government-to-government consultation regarding the proposed Project. We would like you and your client to know that the Tribe does not consider initial inquiry letters from project consultants to constitute appropriate government-to-government consultation, but rather tools to obtain further information about the Project area. Therefore, the Tribe reserves its rights to participate in the formal environmental review process, including government-to-government consultation with the Lead Agency, and requests to be included in all correspondence regarding this Project.

Please note that we are interested in participating in surveys within ‘Ataaxum/Payomkawichum Ancestral Territory. Prior to conducting any surveys, please contact the Cultural Department to schedule specifics. If you have any additional questions or comments, please contact me at [email protected] or 951-770-6306.
incerely,
Paul E. Macarro
Cultural Coordinator
Pechanga Reservation
Pechanga CulturalResources * PechangaBand ofIndians
Post OfficeBox2183 * Temecula, CA 92592
SacredIs TheDuty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor WeRise To TheNeed 1508


























!

"


#
#!
$%&
'()'*+,
-&
+

!"&
+


".&
"

.('*'$'''//0$)//+&('*'$'''//0$)/1
234567879::4;<=3456>?6@=346:89:@93=8A;B9:@4;CD8A?E F=BGA;B=@AH;IA3?6@4A;F=J9=B@KL=:6CAM635M3AN=8@ 0 


29;48=O?P34QRS!
#T
UV


#,WX
X
T$

*
YZ


V


!


!
#!ZR


V


!


!
#!W [

S



Y"
\
!

!

"
]




. .
!!


"


.

!


#]






!


"



\


,
-
"


!
.!




!
,
.T\
"




!






[




X
T


\$#


.
!


-
.

"


.

!





,

!




!
#^-
,


"


.

!
!

.-
"]

!


Y



\
.
"








"

Y
T
#!"]


-
-"



,




,



!






)".

"

!
T
T
!

S_

,
-#

Y"
\


\
!

.
!
#\"
,

\
..





!






!"




\




!,

!
#




.
S!


`abcdefghicj
klmnlopmqrstloursvruwxyuypx
S!
#T
UV


#,
z{|}~}€‚ƒ€}„„
†~ƒ‡~„„
ˆ{|}~}‚}ƒ‚€‰
/)/*
\


[
^"
.


*0/
L=:6CAM635M3AN=8@H;IAF=JDGŠI
'‹
234567879::4;R


V


!


!
#!W X
X
T$

*0
Y^

"Œ"
R"

"V


!


!
#!W ^^

"


!
,
.
"



.
\



#"

,

-










T
-
-.


"
Ž
.

.
"


T




"
Ž^.

#
"


T



"



,




T



!
-
-

.



".-"

"

,
\!.!

.#

-

\
.!!\
.
"
S!

"




#
2/2/24, 11:21 AM Material Culture Consulting Mail - Response to Information Request - Belago Park Project + M Gmail Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Response to Information Request - Belago Park Project
3 messages
Eunice Ambriz <[email protected]> Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:14 AM To: "[email protected]” <[email protected]> Dear Erika,
Thank you for contacting the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians concerning the proposed project area. San Manuel appreciates the opportunity to review the project documentation received by the Cultural Resources Management Department on February 2, 2024. Based on our current knowledge, the proposed project area is not sensitive for cultural resources. However, the proposed project is located within Serrano Ancestral Territory and is therefore of interest to the Tribe. As such, San Manuel will still wish to engage in government-to-government consultation pursuant to AB 52, should this project be subject to CEQA review.

Thank you again for your correspondence. If you have any additional questions or comments,please reach out to me at your earliest convenience.

Regards,
Eunice
Eunice Ambriz
Cultural ResourcesTechnician
[email protected]
0:(909) 864-8933 x 50-2033
M:(909) 649-4867
26569 Community Center Dr Highland, California 92346
SANSMANUEL BANDOF "3!MISSIONINDIANS
mn Belago Park Project Info Req.pdf
282K
Erika McMullin <[email protected]> Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:23 AM To: Hannah Johnston <[email protected]> Hi Hannah,
| received this response today from our letters. Whenever we get a response from a tribe, we will update the NA log and upload the tribe’s response in the NAHC folder. If the tribe states the area is positive for a tribal resource, we will need to keep this mind when the survey is conducted.
| also will reply and cc you and thanking Eunice for her response. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=fe87458921&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f: 178980818866302566 1&simpl=msg-f:17898081886630256... 1/2 1509
Appendix D
Geotechnical Evaluation
Appendix F
Geotechnical Evaluation
Kimley»Horn
1510

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION

PROPOSED BELAGO PARK
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) 478-120-027

BRODIAEA AVENUE AND REDLANDS BOULEVARD

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

PREPARED FOR

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS
333 CITY BOULEVARD WEST, SUITE 1700
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868

PREPARED BY
GEOTEK, INC.
1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92878
PROJECT NO. 3966-CR JULY 16, 2024

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION

PROPOSED BELAGO PARK
AssessOR’sPARCELNUMBER(APN) 478-120-027

BRODIAEA AVENUE AND REDLANDS BOULEVARD
CITY oF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

PREPAREDFOR
PAssco PACIFICA INVESTMENTS
333 City BOULEVARD WEST, SUITE 1700
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868

PREPAREDBY
GEOTEK, INC.
1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92878
PROJECT No. 3966-CR JuLy 16,2024
GEOTEK 1511
GEOTECHNICAL | ENVIRONMENTAL | MATERIALS
July 16, 2024
Project No. 3966-CR
Passco Pacifica Investments
333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1700
Orange, California 92868
Attention: Mr. Oscar Graham
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Belago Park
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 478-120-027
Brodiaea Avenue and Redlands Boulevard
City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Dear Mr. Graham:

GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) is pleased to provide the results of this Geotechnical Evaluation for the proposed Belago Park project to be located southwest of the intersection of Brodiaea Avenue and Redlands Boulevard, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This report presents the results of GeoTek’s evaluation, discussion of findings, and provides geotechnical recommendations for foundation design and construction.

Based upon review and evaluation, site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the design and construction phases of the project.

GeoTek,Inc.
1548North MapleStreet,Corona,California 92878
(951) 710-1160Office (951) 710-1167Fax www.geotekusa.com GEOTEK July 16,2024
Project No. 3966-CR
Passco Pacifica Investments
333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1700
Orange, California 92868
Attention: Mr. Oscar Graham
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Belago Park
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 478-120-027
Brodiaea Avenue and Redlands Boulevard
City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California
Dear Mr. Graham:

GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) is pleased to provide the results of this Geotechnical Evaluation for the proposed Belago Park project to be located southwest of the intersection of Brodiaesa Avenue and Redlands Boulevard, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This report presents the results of GeoTek’s evaluation, discussion of findings, and provides geotechnical recommendations for foundation design and construction.

Based upon review and evaluation, site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the design and construction phases of the project.

GEOTECHNICAL | ENVIRONMENTAL | MATERIALS
1512
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 2
The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact GeoTek.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoTek, Inc.

Bruce A. Hick
GE 2284, Exp. 12/31/24
Geotechnical Engineer
Edward H. LaMont
CEG 1892, Exp. 07/31/26
Principal Geologist
Anna M. Scott
Project Geologist
Distribution: (1) Addressee via email (one PDF file)
\\geotekfs1\Riverside\Projects\3951 to 4000\3966CR Passco Pacifica Investments Belago Park Moreno Valley\Geotechnical Evaluation\3966CR Geotechnical Evaluation Belago Park Moreno Valley.doc PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 2
The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact GeoTek.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoTek, Inc.

Breeco pL Bruce A. Hick Edward H. LaMont
GE 2284,Exp. 12/31/24 CEG 1892,Exp.07/31/26
Geotechnical Engineer Principal Geologist
NG NA
=
A Coto
Anna M. Scott
Project Geologist
Distribution: (1) Addressee via email (one PDF file)
\\geotekfs I\Riverside\Projects\395! to 4000\3966CR Passco Pacifica Investments Belago Park Moreno Valley\Geotechnical Evaluatio’\3966CR GeotechnicalEvaluationBelagoParkMoreno Valley.doc GEOTEK 1513
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................. 1

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT............................................................... 1

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................................................1

2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................................................................2

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................ 3

3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION...............................................................................................................................................................3

3.2 LABORATORY TESTING..........................................................................................................................................................3

4. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS........................................................................................... 4

4.1 REGIONAL SETTING................................................................................................................................................................4

4.2 GENERAL SOIL CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................................4

4.3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER ............................................................................................................................5

4.3.1 Surface Water .................................................................................................................................................................................5

4.3.2 Groundwater.....................................................................................................................................................................................5

4.4 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY....................................................................................................................................................6

4.4.1 Faulting...............................................................................................................................................................................................6

4.4.2 Seismic Design Parameters..........................................................................................................................................................6

4.5 LIQUEFACTION........................................................................................................................................................................7

4.6 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS .....................................................................................................................................................8

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................ 8

5.1 GENERAL..................................................................................................................................................................................8

5.2 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS..........................................................................................................................................8

5.2.1 General...............................................................................................................................................................................................8

5.2.2 Site Clearing......................................................................................................................................................................................9

5.2.3 Site Preparation...............................................................................................................................................................................9

5.2.4 Engineered Fill..................................................................................................................................................................................9

5.2.5 Trench Excavations and Backfill .............................................................................................................................................10

5.2.6 Shrinkage and Bulking................................................................................................................................................................10

5.2.7 Grading Plan Review ...................................................................................................................................................................11

5.3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................................................11

5.3.1 Foundation Design Criteria .......................................................................................................................................................11

5.3.2 Slab Underlayment......................................................................................................................................................................14

5.3.3 Miscellaneous Foundation Recommendations....................................................................................................................15

5.3.4 Foundation Setbacks...................................................................................................................................................................16

5.3.5 Soil Corrosivity...............................................................................................................................................................................16

5.3.6 Soil Sulfate Content.....................................................................................................................................................................16

5.3.7 Import Soils....................................................................................................................................................................................16

5.4 RETAINING AND GARDEN WALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................16

5.5 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................19

5.5.1 Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement ...........................................................................................................................................19

5.5.2 Interlocking Concrete Pavers....................................................................................................................................................20

5.5.3 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement.......................................................................................................................21

5.5.4 Pavement Construction ..............................................................................................................................................................21 PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION |

2.2 PROJECTDESCRIPTION 2

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 3

3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION 3

3.2 LABORATORYTESTING 3

4. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS 4

4.1 REGIONALSETTING 4

4.2 GENERALSOIL CONDITIONS 4

4.3 SURFACEWATER AND GROUNDWATER 5

4.3.1 Surface Water 5

4.3.2 Groundwater. 5
44 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 6

4.4.1 Faulting 6

4.4.2 SeismicDesignParameters 6
45 LIQUEFACTION 7

4.6 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS 8

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8

5.1 GENERAL 8

5.2 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS 8

5.2.1 Generdl 8

5.2.2 SiteClearing 9

5.2.3 SitePreparation 9

5.2.4 EngineeredFill 9

5.2.5 TrenchExcavations andBackfill 10

5.2.6 ShrinkageandBulking 10

5.2.7 GradingPlanReview I

5.3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1

5.3.1 FoundationDesignCriteria I

5.3.2 SlabUnderlayment 14

5.3.3 MiscellaneousFoundationRecommendations 15

5.3.4 FoundationSetbacks 16

5.3.5 SoilCorrosivity 16

5.3.6 SoilSulfate Content 16

5.3.7 ImportSoils 16

5.4 RETAINING AND GARDEN WALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 16

5.5 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 19

5.5.1 AsphaltConcrete (AC)Pavement 19

5.5.2 InterlockingConcretePavers 20

5.5.3 PortlandCement Concrete (PCC)Pavement 21]

5.5.4 Pavement Construction 21
J83
GEOTEK 1514
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.6 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION..............................................................................................................................................22

5.6.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................22

5.6.2 Concrete Mix Design ..................................................................................................................................................................23

5.6.3 Concrete Flatwork........................................................................................................................................................................23

5.6.4 Concrete Performance................................................................................................................................................................24

5.7 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS ....................................................................................................24

6. INTENT ............................................................................................................................................... 25

7. LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 25

8. SELECTED REFERENCES................................................................................................................. 26

ENCLOSURES
Figure 1 – Site Location and Topography Map
Figure 2 – Boring Location Map
Appendix A – Logs of Exploratory Borings
Appendix B – Results of Laboratory Testing
Appendix C – General Earthwork Grading Guidelines
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.6 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 22

5.6.1 General 22

5.6.2 ConcreteMix Design 23

5.6.3 ConcreteFlatwork 23

5.6.4 ConcretePerformance 24

5.7 PLAN REVIEWAND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS 24

6. INTENT 25

7. LIMITATIONS 25

8. SELECTED REFERENCES 26

ENCLOSURES
Figure | —Site Location and Topography Map
Figure 2 —Boring Location Map
Appendix A —Logs of Exploratory Borings
Appendix B —Results of Laboratory Testing
Appendix C —General Earthwork Grading Guidelines
GEOTEK 1515
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 1

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geotechnical engineering and geologic conditions at the project site, as outlined in GeoTek’s proposal P-1007623-CR, dated October 31, 2023.

Services provided for this study included the following:
▪ Research and review of available geologic data and general information pertinent to the site,
▪ Perform a site reconnaissance,
▪ Site exploration consisting of the excavation, logging, and sampling of six (6) exploratory test borings extending to depths ranging from approximately 14.5 to 51.5 feet below existing grades,
▪ Laboratory testing of soil samples collected during the field investigation, ▪ Review and evaluation of site seismicity and geologic hazards, and ▪ Preparation of this geotechnical report which presents GeoTek’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations for this site.

The intent of this report is to aid in the evaluation of the site for future proposed improvements from a geotechnical perspective. The professional opinions and geotechnical information contained in this report may need to be updated based upon review of the final site development plans. These plans should be provided to GeoTek for review when available.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Belago Park project site is located southwest of the intersection of Brodiaea Avenue and Redlands Boulevard, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (see Figure 1, Site Location Map). The site is also identified as Riverside County Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 478-120-027, which totals approximately 7.54-acres in size.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page |
I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geotechnical engineeringand geologic conditions at the project site, as outlined in GeoTek’s proposal P-1007623-CR, dated October 31, 2023.

Services provided for this study included the following:
= Research and review of available geologic data and general information pertinent to the site,
= Perform a site reconnaissance,
= Site exploration consisting of the excavation, logging, and sampling of six (6) exploratory test borings extending to depths ranging from approximately 14.5 to 51.5 feet below existing grades,
= Laboratory testing of soil samples collected during the field investigation, = Review and evaluation of site seismicity and geologic hazards, and * Preparation of this geotechnical report which presents GeoTek’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations for this site.

The intent of this report is to aid in the evaluation of the site for future proposed improvements from a geotechnical perspective. The professional opinions and geotechnical information contained in this report may need to be updated based upon review of the final site development plans. These plans should be provided to GeoTek for review when available.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Belago Park project site is located southwest of the intersection of Brodiaea Avenue and Redlands Boulevard, in the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (see Figure I, Site Location Map). The site is also identified as Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 478-120-027, which totals approximately 7.54-acres in size.

G
GEOTEK 1516
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 2
Access to the site is from either Brodiaea Avenue or Redlands Boulevard, an unpaved, dirt road and paved, improved roadway located adjacent to the northern and eastern site boundaries, respectively.

The site is currently vacant land with the exception of a remnant concrete slab in the northeastern portion. The site consists of relatively flat terrain with a moderate covering of native grasses/brush. Site drainage is generally directed down to the south-southwest.

2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
GeoTek has not been provided with a proposed site development plan as of the date of this report. Based upon information provided, GeoTek understands that the project will consist of the construction of a community park, with typical amenities along with associated utility improvements and parking/drive areas.

While structural plans have not yet been provided, GeoTek anticipates the proposed structures for the park development will exert relatively light foundation loading and will be of wood- or masonry-framed construction. Additionally, it is assumed the proposed structures will be supported by conventional shallow foundations with conventional slab-on-grade floors.

Sewage disposal is anticipated via a public sewer system. Stormwater management facilities are anticipated to be included as part of site development, however, the details regarding the proposed facilities to be used for the development are currently unknown.

The Preliminary Grading Plan for future Tract 38158 (Robert Beers, 2024) which will be developed west and south of the park site indicates that the park area will require on the order of one to two feet of cut or fill to reach design grades.

If site development differs from the assumptions made herein, the recommendations included in this report should be subject to further review and evaluation. Site development plans (including final grading plans) should be reviewed by GeoTek when they become available.

Based upon review of historic aerial photographs, the southern portion of the subject property was located within a southwest-northeast trending drainage course that existed prior to mid1960s. In the late 1960s, the referenced drainage appeared to have been channelized as part of a project by Riverside County Flood Control District. Between mid-1960s and early 2000s, the site appeared to have been used as agricultural land with a residential structure and associated improvements located in the north portion of the site. The photos from the late 2000’s indicate that the property was abandoned.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 2
Access to the site is from either Brodiaea Avenue or Redlands Boulevard, an unpaved, dirt road and paved, improved roadway located adjacent to the northern and eastern site boundaries, respectively.

The site is currently vacant land with the exception of a remnant concrete slab in the northeastern portion. The site consists of relatively flat terrain with a moderate covering of native grasses/brush. Site drainage is generally directed down to the south-southwest.

2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
GeoTek has not been provided with a proposed site development plan as of the date of this report. Based upon information provided, GeoTek understands that the project will consist of the construction of a community park, with typical amenities along with associated utility improvements and parking/drive areas.

While structural plans have not yet been provided, GeoTek anticipates the proposed structures for the park development will exert relatively light foundation loading and will be of wood- or masonry-framed construction. Additionally, it is assumed the proposed structures will be supported by conventional shallow foundations with conventional slab-on-grade floors.

Sewage disposal is anticipated via a public sewer system. Stormwater management facilities are anticipated to be included as part of site development, however, the details regarding the proposed facilities to be used for the development are currently unknown.

The Preliminary Grading Plan for future Tract 38158 (Robert Beers, 2024) which will be developed west and south of the park site indicates that the park area will require on the order of one to two feet of cut or fill to reach design grades.

If site development differs from the assumptions made herein, the recommendations included in this report should be subject to further review and evaluation. Site development plans (including final grading plans) should be reviewed by GeoTek when they become available.

Based upon review of historic aerial photographs, the southern portion of the subject property was located within a southwest-northeast trending drainage course that existed prior to mid1960s. In the late 1960s, the referenced drainage appeared to have been channelized as part of a project by Riverside County Flood Control District. Between mid-1960s and early 2000s, the site appeared to have been used as agricultural land with a residential structure and associated improvements located in the north portion of the site. The photos from the late 2000's indicate that the property was abandoned.

G
GEOTEK 1517
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 3

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING

3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for this report was conducted on July 1, 2024 and included the drilling of six (6) geotechnical exploratory borings with a truck-mounted hollow-stem auger drill rig to depths ranging from about 14.5 to 51.5 feet each below existing grade at the boring locations.

The approximate locations of the GeoTek excavations are shown on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). A geologist from GeoTek logged the excavations and collected soil samples for use in subsequent laboratory testing. The logs of the exploratory borings are included in Appendix A.

Relatively undisturbed soil samples were recovered at various intervals in the geotechnical borings with a California sampler. The California sampler is a 3-inch outside diameter, 2.5-inch inside diameter, split barrel sampler lined with brass rings. The sampler was 18 inches long.

The sampler conformed to the requirements of ASTM D 3550. A 140-pound automatic trip hammer was utilized, dropping 30 inches for each blow. The relatively undisturbed samples, together with bulk samples of representative soil types, were returned to the laboratory for testing and evaluation. The sampler test data are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A.

In Boring B-1, standard penetration tests (SPT) were performed with a 2.0-inch outside diameter, 1.5-inch inside diameter, and split-barrel sampler. The sampler was 18 inches long.

The inside diameter of the sampler shoe was 1.4 inches. The sampler was unlined. The sampler conformed to the requirements of ASTM D 1586. A 140-pound automatic trip hammer was utilized, dropping 30 inches for each blow. The sampler penetration test data are presented on the log for Boring B-1.

3.2 LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed on selected relatively undisturbed ring and bulk samples collected during the field exploration. The purpose of the laboratory testing was to confirm the field classification of the materials encountered and to evaluate their physical properties for use in engineering design and analysis. Results of the laboratory testing program along with a brief description and relevant information regarding testing procedures are included on the exploratory borings logs included in Appendix A and in Appendix B.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 3

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING

3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for this report was conducted on July |, 2024 and included the drilling of six (6) geotechnical exploratory borings with a truck-mounted hollow-stem auger drill rig to depths ranging from about 14.5 to 51.5 feet each below existing grade at the boring locations.

The approximate locations of the GeoTek excavations are shown on the Boring Location Map (Figure 2). A geologist from GeoTek logged the excavations and collected soil samples for use in subsequent laboratory testing. The logs of the exploratory borings are included in Appendix A
Relatively undisturbed soil samples were recovered at various intervals in the geotechnical borings with a California sampler. The California sampler is a 3-inch outside diameter, 2.5-inch inside diameter, split barrel sampler lined with brass rings. The sampler was 18 inches long.

The sampler conformed to the requirements of ASTM D 3550. A 140-pound automatic trip hammer was utilized, dropping 30 inches for each blow. The relatively undisturbed samples, together with bulk samples of representative soil types, were returned to the laboratory for testing and evaluation. The sampler test data are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A.

In Boring B-1, standard penetration tests (SPT) were performed with a 2.0-inch outside diameter, |.5-inch inside diameter, and split-barrel sampler. The sampler was 18 inches long.

The inside diameter of the sampler shoe was |.4 inches. The sampler was unlined. The sampler conformed to the requirements of ASTM D 1586. A 140-pound automatic trip hammer was utilized, dropping 30 inches for each blow. The sampler penetration test data are presented on the log for Boring B-1.

3.2 LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed on selected relatively undisturbed ring and bulk samples collected during the field exploration. The purpose of the laboratory testing was to confirm the field classification of the materials encountered and to evaluate their physical properties for use in engineering design and analysis. Results of the laboratory testing program along with a brief description and relevant information regarding testing procedures are included on the exploratory borings logs included in Appendix A and in Appendix B.

G
GEOTEK 1518
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 4

4. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS

4.1 REGIONAL SETTING
The subject property is situated in the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province. The Peninsular Ranges province is one of the largest geomorphic units in western North America. It extends approximately 975 miles south of the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province to the tip of Baja California. This province varies in width from about 30 to 100 miles. It is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the south by the Gulf of California and on the east by the Colorado Desert Province.

The Peninsular Ranges are essentially a series of northwest-southeast oriented fault blocks.

Several major fault zones are found in this province. The Elsinore Fault zone and the San Jacinto Fault zone trend northwest-southeast and are found near the middle of the province.

The San Andreas Fault zone borders the northeasterly margin of the province.

More specific to the subject property, the site is in an area geologically mapped to be underlain by both alluvium and older alluvial fan deposits (Dibblee, T.W., Minch, J.A., 2003). No active faults are shown in the immediate site vicinity on the maps reviewed for the area.

The site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Alquist-Priolo) as designated by the State of California or a fault zone as designated by the County of Riverside. The County of Riverside has designated the site as “not in a fault zone”, “not in a fault line”, as having a “moderate” potential for liquefaction and as “susceptible” to subsidence.

4.2 GENERAL SOIL CONDITIONS
A brief description of the earth materials encountered is presented in the following section.

Based on the site reconnaissance, the exploratory excavations and review of published geologic maps, the area investigated is locally underlain by undocumented fill which is in turn underlain by alluvium.

4.2.1 Undocumented Fill
Undocumented fill soils were encountered in all borings excavated, from existing grades to approximately two (2) to three (3) feet in depth. However, deeper fill should be anticipated in the northern portion of the site where previous buildings, underground utilities, septic tank systems and other improvements may have existed. The undocumented fill soils generally PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 4

4. GEOLOGICAND SOILS CONDITIONS

4.1 REGIONAL SETTING
The subject property is situated in the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province. The Peninsular Ranges province is one of the largest geomorphic units in western North America. It extends approximately 975 miles south of the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province to the tip of Baja California. This province varies in width from about 30 to 100 miles. It is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the south by the Gulf of California and on the east by the Colorado Desert Province.

The Peninsular Ranges are essentially a series of northwest-southeast oriented fault blocks.

Several major fault zones are found in this province. The Elsinore Fault zone and the San Jacinto Fault zone trend northwest-southeast and are found near the middle of the province.

The SanAndreas Fault zone borders the northeasterly margin of the province.

More specific to the subject property, the site is in an area geologically mapped to be underlain by both alluvium and older alluvial fan deposits (Dibblee, T.W., Minch, J.A., 2003). No active faults are shown in the immediate site vicinity on the maps reviewed for the area.

The site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Alquist-Priolo) as designated by the State of California or a fault zone as designated by the County of Riverside. The County of Riverside has designated the site as “not in a fault zone”, “not in a fault line”, as having a “moderate” potential for liquefaction and as “susceptible” to subsidence.

4.2 GENERAL SOIL CONDITIONS
A brief description of the earth materials encountered is presented in the following section.

Based on the site reconnaissance, the exploratory excavations and review of published geologic maps, the area investigated is locally underlain by undocumented fill which is in turn underlain by alluvium.

4.2.1 Undocumented Fill
Undocumented fill soils were encountered in all borings excavated, from existing grades to approximately two (2) to three (3) feet in depth. However, deeper fill should be anticipated in the northern portion of the site where previous buildings, underground utilities, septic tank systems and other improvements may have existed. The undocumented fill soils generally G
GEOTEK 1519
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 5
consisted of silty clay and clayey silt (CL and ML soil typed per the USCS Soil Classification System). These materials are most likely the results of previous agricultural use at the site.

4.2.2 Alluvium
Alluvium, consisting of silty clay and clayey silt with some silty sands and clayey sands (CL, ML, SM and SC soil types per the USCS Soil Classification System), were encountered in the borings excavated, extending below the undocumented fill soils to the maximum depths explored (51.5 feet in Boring B-1). The coarse-grained alluvial soils (SM and SC soils) were found to be medium dense to dense and the fine-grained soils (CL and ML soils) were found to be very stiff to hard.

Based on the laboratory test results, the near surface materials have a “Medium” (51≤EI≤90) Expansion Index (ASTM D 4829). Based on the laboratory test results, the near surface materials have a soluble sulfate content of less than 0.1 percent (ASTM D 4327). The test results are provided in Appendix B.

4.3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER

4.3.1 Surface Water
If encountered during earthwork operations, surface water on this site will most be likely the result of precipitation or possibly some minor surface run-off from the surrounding areas.

Overall site area drainage is generally to the southwest. Provisions for surface drainage will need to be accounted for by the project civil engineer.

4.3.2 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet) at the time of drilling. Based on a review of the California Department of Water Resources Water Data Library, current groundwater depths in the site vicinity are greater than 80 feet below existing grade.

Based on the results of the field exploration, review of site area geomorphology and geology, groundwater is not anticipated to adversely affect the proposed site improvements.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 5
consisted of silty clay and clayey silt (CL and ML soil typed per the USCS Soil Classification System). These materials are most likely the results of previous agricultural use at the site.

4.2.2 Alluvium
Alluvium, consisting of silty clay and clayey silt with some silty sands and clayey sands (CL, ML, SM and SC soil types per the USCSSoil Classification System), were encountered in the borings excavated, extending below the undocumented fill soils to the maximum depths explored (51.5 feet in Boring B-1). The coarse-grained alluvial soils (SM and SC soils) were found to be medium dense to dense and the fine-grained soils (CL and ML soils) were found to be very stiff to hard.

Based on the laboratory test results, the near surface materials have a “Medium” (51<EI<90) Expansion Index (ASTM D 4829). Based on the laboratory test results, the near surface materials have a soluble sulfate content of less than 0.1 percent (ASTM D 4327). The test results are provided in Appendix B.

4.3 SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER

4.3.1 Surface Water
If encountered during earthwork operations, surface water on this site will most be likely the result of precipitation or possibly some minor surface run-off from the surrounding areas.

Overall site area drainage is generally to the southwest. Provisions for surface drainage will need to be accounted for by the project civil engineer.

4.3.2 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet) at the time of drilling. Based on a review of the California Department of Water Resources Water Data Library, current groundwater depths in the site vicinity are greater than 80 feet below existing grade.

Based on the results of the field exploration, review of site area geomorphology and geology, groundwater is not anticipated to adversely affect the proposed site improvements.

G
GEOTEK 1520
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 6

4.4 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY

4.4.1 Faulting
The geologic structure of the entire California area is dominated mainly by northwest-trending faults associated with the San Andreas system. The site is in a seismically active region.

However, the site is not situated within a State of California designated “Alquist-Priolo” Earthquake Fault Zone.

The nearest known active fault is the San Jacinto Fault Zone (San Bernardino Valley section) located approximately 2.25 miles to the northeast of the site.

4.4.2 Seismic Design Parameters
The site is located at approximately 33.9129 degrees Latitude and -117.1577 degrees Longitude. Based upon the relatively dense/stiff nature of the site soils, a Site Class “D” is considered appropriate for this site. Site spectral accelerations (Sa and S1), for 0.2 and 1.0 second periods for a Class “D” site, was determined from the SEAOC/OSHPD web interface that utilizes the USGS web services and retrieves the seismic design data and presents that information in a report format. Using the ASCE 7-16 option on the SEAOC/OSHPD website results in the values for SM1 and SD1 reported as “null-See Section 11.4.8” (of ASCE 7-16). As noted in ASCE 7-16, Section 11.4.8, a site-specific ground motion procedure is recommended for Site Class D when the value S1 exceeds 0.2. The value S1 for the subject site exceeds 0.2.

For a Site Class “D”, an exception to performing a site-specific ground motion analysis is allowed in ASCE 7-16 where S1 exceeds 0.2 provided the value of the seismic response coefficient, Cs, is conservatively calculated by Eq 12.8-2 of ASCE 7-16 for values of T≤1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. 12.8-3 for TL≥T>1.5Ts or Eq. 12.8-4 for T>TL.

The results, based on the 2015 NEHRP and the 2022 CBC, are presented in the following table as it is assumed that the exception as allowed in ASCE 7-16 is applicable. If the exception is deemed not appropriate, a site-specific ground motion analysis will be required.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 6

4.4 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY

4.4.1 Faulting
The geologic structure of the entire California area is dominated mainly by northwest-trending faults associated with the San Andreas system. The site is in a seismically active region.

However, the site is not situated within a State of California designated “Alquist-Priolo™ Earthquake Fault Zone.

The nearest known active fault is the San Jacinto Fault Zone (San Bernardino Valley section) located approximately 2.25 miles to the northeast of the site.

4.4.2 Seismic Design Parameters
The site is located at approximately 33.9129 degrees Latitude and -117.1577 degrees Longitude. Based upon the relatively dense/stiff nature of the site soils, a Site Class “D” is considered appropriate for this site. Site spectral accelerations (Sa and Si), for 0.2 and 1.0 second periods for a Class “D” site, was determined from the SEAOC/OSHPD web interface that utilizes the USGS web services and retrieves the seismic design data and presents that information in a report format. Using the ASCE 7-16 option on the SEAOC/OSHPD website results in the values for Sy, and Sp, reported as “null-See Section 11.4.8” (of ASCE 7-16). As noted in ASCE 7-16, Section | 1.4.8, a site-specific ground motion procedure is recommended for Site Class D when the value S; exceeds 0.2. The value S, for the subject site exceeds 0.2.

For a Site Class “D”, an exception to performing a site-specific ground motion analysis is allowed in ASCE 7-16 where S, exceeds 0.2 provided the value of the seismic response coefficient, Cs, is conservatively calculated by Eq 12.8-2 of ASCE 7-16 for values of T<1.5Ts and taken as equal to |.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. 12.8-3 for T.2T>1.5Ts or Eq. 12.8-4 for T>T..

The results, based on the 2015 NEHRP and the 2022 CBC, are presented in the following table as it is assumed that the exception as allowed in ASCE 7-16 is applicable. If the exception is deemed not appropriate, a site-specific ground motion analysis will be required.

GEOTEK 1521
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 7

SITE SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Mapped 0.2 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, Ss 2.066g
Mapped 1.0 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, S1 0.825g
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fv 1.7
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 0.2 Second, SMS

2.066g
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 1.0 Second, SM1

1.403g
5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at

0.2 Second, SDS

1.377g
5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1 second, SD1

0.935g
Peak Ground Acceleration (PGAM) 0.965g
Seismic Design Category E
Risk Category II
Site Class D
Final selection of the appropriate seismic design coefficients should be made by the project structural engineer based upon the local practices and ordinances, expected building response and desired level of conservatism.

4.5 LIQUEFACTION
Liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquakeinduced ground motion, create excess pore pressures in relatively cohesionless soils. These soils may thereby acquire a high degree of mobility, which can lead to lateral movement, sliding, consolidation and settlement of loose sediments, sand boils and other damaging deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table, but, after liquefaction has developed, the effects can propagate upward into overlying non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates.

The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and grain size, relative density, groundwater level, confining pressures, and both intensity and duration of ground shaking. In general, materials that are susceptible to liquefaction are loose, saturated granular soils having low fines content under low confining pressures.

The project site is not located within an area mapped by the State of California for liquefaction potential. The County of Riverside has indicated the site has a “moderate” liquefaction potential hazard. However, based on the estimated depth to historic high groundwater, and due to the relatively dense/stiff state of the subsurface materials as encountered in the borings, the liquefaction hazard potential is considered nil for the project site.

PASSCcO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 7

B SITE SEISMIC PARAMETER F
Mapped 0.2 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, Ss 2.066g
Mapped 1.0 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, Si 0.825¢
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fv 1.7
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration 2.066g for 0.2 Second, SMs Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration 1.403g for 1.0 Second, SMI 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1.377g

0.2 Second, Sps
5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 0.935¢ | second, SDI Peak Ground Acceleration (PGAw) 0.965g
Seismic Design Category E
Risk Category Il
Site Class D
Final selection of the appropriate seismic design coefficients should be made by the project structural engineer based upon the local practices and ordinances, expected building response and desired level of conservatism.

4.5 LIQUEFACTION
Liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquakeinduced ground motion, create excess pore pressures in relatively cohesionless soils. These soils may thereby acquire a high degree of mobility, which can lead to lateral movement, sliding, consolidation and settlement of loose sediments, sand boils and other damaging deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table, but, after liquefaction has developed, the effects can propagate upward into overlying non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates.

The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and grain size, relative density, groundwater level, confining pressures, and both intensity and duration of ground shaking. In general, materials that are susceptible to liquefaction are loose, saturated granular soils having low fines content under low confining pressures.

The project site is not located within an area mapped by the State of California for liquefaction potential. The County of Riverside has indicated the site has a “moderate” liquefaction potential hazard. However, based on the estimated depth to historic high groundwater, and due to the relatively dense/stiff state of the subsurface materials as encountered in the borings, the liquefaction hazard potential is considered nil for the project site. eX
GEOTEK 1522
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 8

4.6 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS
Due to the general flat terrain, the potential for seismic induced landslides or lateral spreading is considered nil. The potential for secondary seismic hazards such as a seiche and tsunami is considered negligible due to site elevation and distance from an open body of water.

Due to the dense/hard nature of the underlying alluvium, seismic induced (“dry sand”) settlements are estimated to be minimal.

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 GENERAL
The anticipated site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the following recommendations, and those provided by this firm at a later date, are incorporated into the design and construction phases of development. Site development, grading, and foundation plans should be reviewed by GeoTek, Inc. when they become available so the recommendations contained in this report can be confirmed.

The upper site soils appear to have been disturbed due to past farming activities and previous demolition of slabs, building foundations and underground utilities. Remedial grading, consisting of overexcavation and recompaction of the upper site soils, is recommended to provide a uniform bearing for the proposed park improvements.

5.2 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS

5.2.1 General
Earthwork and grading should be performed in accordance with the applicable grading ordinances of the City of Moreno Valley, the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and recommendations contained in this report. The Grading Guidelines included in Appendix C outline general procedures and do not anticipate all site-specific situations. In the event of conflict, the recommendations presented in the text of this report should supersede those contained in Appendix C.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 8

4.6 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS
Due to the general flat terrain, the potential for seismic induced landslides or lateral spreading is considered nil. The potential for secondary seismic hazards such as a seiche and tsunami is considered negligible due to site elevation and distance from an open body of water.

Due to the dense/hard nature of the underlying alluvium, seismic induced (“dry sand”) settlements are estimated to be minimal.

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5. GENERAL
The anticipated site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the following recommendations, and those provided by this firm at a later date, are incorporated into the design and construction phases of development. Site development, grading, and foundation plans should be reviewed by GeoTek, Inc. when they become available so the recommendations contained in this report can be confirmed.

The upper site soils appear to have been disturbed due to past farming activities and previous demolition of slabs, building foundations and underground utilities. Remedial grading, consisting of overexcavation and recompaction of the upper site soils, is recommended to provide a uniform bearing for the proposed park improvements.

5.2 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS

5.2.1 General
Earthwork and grading should be performed in accordance with the applicable grading ordinances of the City of Moreno Valley, the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and recommendations contained in this report. The Grading Guidelines included in Appendix C outline general procedures and do not anticipate all site-specific situations. In the event of conflict, the recommendations presented in the text of this report should supersede those contained in Appendix C.

G
GEOTEK 1523
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 9

5.2.2 Site Clearing
In areas of planned grading and improvements, the locations of existing utilities should be determined. The utilities should be relocated or abandoned. Initial site preparation should commence with removal of any existing structures, underground utilities, slabs, pavements, demolition related debris, any deleterious materials and vegetation within the limits of the planned improvements. These materials should be properly disposed of off-site. Voids resulting from removing any materials should be replaced with engineered fill materials with expansion characteristics similar to or better than the onsite materials.

5.2.3 Site Preparation
The upper three (3) feet of soil from existing grade or proposed grade, whichever is deeper, should be removed beneath all areas to receive new fill and/or surface improvements. The precise depths of over-excavation should be determined by a GeoTek representative during site construction based on actual soil conditions encountered. The lateral extent of this recommendation should include the area extending at least five (5) feet beyond grading limits, where obtainable. The bottoms of all remedial excavations should be reviewed and approved by a GeoTek representative. Removal bottoms should be relatively uniform in soil type, which is not visibly porous and having an in-place density of at least 85 percent of the soil’s maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

Once the base of the over-excavation is approved, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, be moisture treated to slightly above the soil’s optimum moisture content (ASTM D1557), and then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil’s maximum dry density (ASTM D1557).

Testing by GeoTek is recommended to document that the engineered fill soils have been properly moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended.

5.2.4 Engineered Fill
The on-site soils are generally considered suitable for reuse as engineered fill provided, they are free from vegetation, demolition related debris, oversized materials (six-inch diameter or greater) and other deleterious material. All areas should be brought to final subgrade elevations with fill materials that are placed and compacted in general accordance with minimum project standards. Engineered fill should be placed in six-to-eight-inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned to slightly above the optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D-1557 test procedures.

If wet soils are encountered during remedial grading, methods for drying soils such as stockpiling or mixing with dry soils may be required to bring the soils to the required moisture PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 9

5.2.2 Site Clearing
In areas of planned grading and improvements, the locations of existing utilities should be determined. The utilities should be relocated or abandoned. Initial site preparation should commence with removal of any existing structures, underground utilities, slabs, pavements, demolition related debris, any deleterious materials and vegetation within the limits of the planned improvements. These materials should be properly disposed of off-site. Voids resulting from removing any materials should be replaced with engineered fill materials with expansion characteristics similar to or better than the onsite materials.

5.2.3 Site Preparation
The upper three (3) feet of soil from existing grade or proposed grade, whichever is deeper, should be removed beneath all areas to receive new fill and/or surface improvements. The precise depths of over-excavation should be determined by a GeoTek representative during site construction based on actual soil conditions encountered. The lateral extent of this recommendation should include the area extending at least five (5) feet beyond grading limits, where obtainable. The bottoms of all remedial excavations should be reviewed and approved by a GeoTek representative. Removal bottoms should be relatively uniform in soil type, which is not visibly porous and having an in-place density of at least 85 percent of the soil’'s maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

Once the base of the over-excavation is approved, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, be moisture treated to slightly above the soil’s optimum moisture content (ASTM D1557), and then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil’s maximum dry density (ASTM D1557).

Testing by GeoTek is recommended to document that the engineered fill soils have been properly moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended.

5.2.4 Engineered Fill
The on-site soils are generally considered suitable for reuse as engineered fill provided, they are free from vegetation, demolition related debris, oversized materials (six-inch diameter or greater) and other deleterious material. All areas should be brought to final subgrade elevations with fill materials that are placed and compacted in general accordance with minimum project standards. Engineered fill should be placed in six-to-eight-inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned to slightly above the optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D-1557 test procedures.

If wet soils are encountered during remedial grading, methods for drying soils such as stockpiling or mixing with dry soils may be required to bring the soils to the required moisture eX
GEOTEK 1524
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 10
content for placement as engineered fill. Placement of engineered fill should be observed and tested on a full-time basis by a GeoTek representative during grading activities.

5.2.5 Trench Excavations and Backfill
Temporary trench excavations within the on-site materials should be stable at a 1.5:1 inclination for short durations during construction and where cuts do not exceed 10 feet in height. Deeper temporary excavations should be reviewed by GeoTek prior to their planned excavation to determine if supplemental recommendations or analysis are warranted. It is anticipated that temporary cuts to a maximum height of four (4) feet can be excavated vertically.

Trench excavations should conform to Cal-OSHA regulations. The contractor should have a competent person, per OSHA requirements, on site during construction to observe conditions and to make the appropriate recommendations.

Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (as determined by ASTM D-1557 test procedures). Under-slab trenches should also be compacted to project specifications. Where applicable, based on jurisdictional requirements, the top 12 inches of backfill below subgrade for road pavements should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. On-site materials may not be suitable for use as bedding material but should be suitable as backfill provided particles larger than six (6) inches are removed.

Compaction should be achieved with a mechanical compaction device. Ponding or jetting of trench backfill is not recommended. If backfill soils have dried out, they should be properly moisture conditioned prior to placement in trenches.

5.2.6 Shrinkage and Bulking
Several factors will impact earthwork balancing on the site, including shrinkage, subsidence, trench spoil from utilities and footing excavations, as well as the accuracy of topography.

For planning purposes, a shrinkage factor of about 10 to 20 percent may be considered for materials that need to be removed and replaced. A subsidence of up to about 0.2-inch is estimated. Site balance areas should be available in order to adjust project grades, depending on actual field conditions at the conclusion of earthwork construction.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 10
content for placement as engineered fill. Placement of engineered fill should be observed and tested ona full-time basis by a GeoTek representative during grading activities.

5.2.5 Trench Excavations and Backfill
Temporary trench excavations within the on-site materials should be stable at a 1.5:1 inclination for short durations during construction and where cuts do not exceed 10 feet in height. Deeper temporary excavations should be reviewed by GeoTek prior to their planned excavation to determine if supplemental recommendations or analysis are warranted. It is anticipated that temporary cuts to a maximum height of four (4) feet can be excavated vertically.

Trench excavations should conform to Cal-OSHA regulations. The contractor should have a competent person, per OSHA requirements, on site during construction to observe conditions and to make the appropriate recommendations.

Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (as determined by ASTM D-1557 test procedures). Under-slab trenches should also be compacted to project specifications. Where applicable, based on jurisdictional requirements, the top 12 inches of backfill below subgrade for road pavements should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. On-site materials may not be suitable for use as bedding material but should be suitable as backfill provided particles larger than six (6) inches are removed.

Compaction should be achieved with a mechanical compaction device. Ponding or jetting of trench backfill is not recommended. If backfill soils have dried out, they should be properly moisture conditioned prior to placement in trenches.

5.2.6 Shrinkage and Bulking
Several factors will impact earthwork balancing on the site, including shrinkage, subsidence, trench spoil from utilities and footing excavations, as well as the accuracy of topography.

For planning purposes, a shrinkage factor of about 10 to 20 percent may be considered for materials that need to be removed and replaced. A subsidence of up to about 0.2-inch is estimated. Site balance areas should be available in order to adjust project grades, depending on actual field conditions at the conclusion of earthwork construction.

G
GEOTEK 1525
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 11

5.2.7 Grading Plan Review
Upon completion of the final site grading plans, it is recommended that those plans be provided to GeoTek for review. Based on that review, some modifications to the recommendations provided in this report may be necessary.

5.3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

5.3.1 Foundation Design Criteria

5.3.1.1 Conventional Shallow Foundations
The near surface materials can be classified as having a “Medium” (51-90) expansion index (EI) in accordance with ASTM D 4829. Typical design criteria for the site based upon a “medium” expansion index are tabulated below. These are minimal recommendations and are not intended to supersede the design by the project structural engineer. Once structural loading information is provided, revisions to the recommendations provided in this report may be necessary.

The conventional foundation elements for the proposed structures/improvements should bear entirely in engineered fill soils. Foundations should be designed in accordance with the 2022 CBC.

Expansion index and soluble sulfate evaluation of the soils should be performed during construction to evaluate the as-graded conditions. Final recommendations should be based upon the as-graded soils conditions.

A summary of the foundation design recommendations is presented in the following table:

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page ||

5.2.7 Grading Plan Review
Upon completion of the final site grading plans, it is recommended that those plans be provided to GeoTek for review. Based on that review, some modifications to the recommendations provided in this report may be necessary.

5.3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

5.3.1 Foundation Design Criteria

5.3.1.1 Conventional Shallow Foundations
The near surface materials can be classified as having a “Medium” (51-90) expansion index (El) in accordance with ASTM D 4829. Typical design criteria for the site based upon a “medium” expansion index are tabulated below. These are minimal recommendations and are not intended to supersede the design by the project structural engineer. Once structural loading information is provided, revisions to the recommendations provided in this report may be necessary.

The conventional foundation elements for the proposed structures/improvements should bear entirely in engineered fill soils. Foundations should be designed in accordance with the 2022 CBC.

Expansion index and soluble sulfate evaluation of the soils should be performed during construction to evaluate the as-graded conditions. Final recommendations should be based upon the as-graded soils conditions.

A summary of the foundation design recommendations is presented in the following table:

GEOTEK 1526
PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 12

GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
Design Parameter “Medium” Expansion Index
Minimum Foundation Depth
(Inches below lowest adjacent grade) 18 – One-story
Minimum Foundation Width (Inches)* 15 – One-story
Minimum Slab Thickness (actual) 5 – Actual
Minimum Slab Reinforcing No. 3 reinforcing bars at 18-inch centers, each way, placed in middle of slab
Minimum Footing Reinforcement Four No. 4 reinforcing bars, two placed near the top and two near the bottom
Effective Plasticity Index** 18
Presaturation of Subgrade Soil
(Percent of Optimum)
Minimum of 120% of the optimum moisture content to a
depth of at least 18 inches prior to placing concrete
*Code minimums per Table 1809.7 of the 2022 CBC should be complied with. **Effective plasticity index should be verified at the completion of rough grading.

An allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for design of building foundations for a footing depth of 18 inches and a footing width of 12 inches. This allowable soil bearing capacity may be increased by 400 psf for each additional 12 inches of embedment depth and by 200 psf for each additional 12 inches in width to a maximum of 3,500 psf. If slab foundations are placed at grade, these should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. The allowable bearing capacity may also be increased by one-third when considering short-term wind and seismic loads. These allowable bearing values contain a minimum factor of safety of three (3).

The passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 230 psf per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 2,300 psf for footings founded on engineered fill or competent native soil. The allowable passive earth pressure contains a factor of safety of 1.5. A coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.30 may be used with dead load forces. The coefficient of friction contains a reduction value of one-third (1/3).

Passive pressure and frictional resistance may be combined without reduction. The upper one foot of soil should be ignored in the passive pressure calculations unless the surface is covered with pavements.

A grade beam, a minimum of 12 inches wide and 18 inches deep, should be utilized across large entrances. The base of the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of the adjoining footings.

PASSCO PACIFICA INVESTMENTS Project No. 3966-CR
Geotechnical Evaluation July 16, 2024
Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California Page 12
B GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDATION pesicn gil Design Parameter “Medium” Expansion Index
Minimum Foundation Depth 18 —One-story
(Inches below lowest adjacent grade)
Minimum Foundation Width (Inches)* 15 —One-story
Minimum Slab Thickness (actual) 5 —Actual
No. 3 reinforcing bars at 18-inch centers, each way, placed Minimum Slab Reinforcing middle of slab Four No. 4 reinforcing bars, Minimum Footing Reinforcement two placed near the top and two near the bottom
EffectivePlasticity Index** 18
Presaturation of Subgrade Soil Minimum of 120%of the optimum moisture content to a (Percent of Optimum) depth of at least 18 inches prior to placing concrete *Code minimums per Table 1809.7 of the 2022 CBC should be complied with. **Effective plasticity index should be verified at the completion of rough grading.