AGENDA
NEWMAN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 25, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 6:00 P.M., 938 FRESNO STREET
NOTICE: THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 59453, SUBDIVISION (e) OF THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54950, ET SEQ.), CITY OF NEWMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2022-04, AND THE FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
GIVEN THE STATE OF EMERGENCY REGARDING THE THREAT OF COVID-19, THIS MEETING WILL NOT BE PHYSICALLY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
All MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE AND COMMENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING AT https://zoom.us/j/96161052680 PASSCODE: 027852 AND VIA TELECONFERENCE BY CALLING (669) 900-6833, MEETING ID: 961 6105 2680 PASSCODE: 027852
1. Call To Order.
2. Pledge Of Allegiance.
3. Invocation.
4. Roll Call.
5. Declaration Of Conflicts Of Interest.
6. Ceremonial Matters.
a. Presentation By Stanislaus Council Of Governments (StanCOG) Regarding The 2022 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS).
7. Items from the Public - Non-Agenda Items.
8. Consent Calendar
a. Waive All Readings Of Ordinances And Resolutions Except By Title. b. Approval Of Warrants. (View Warrant/Check Register)
c. Approval Of Minutes Of The January 11, 2022 Meeting. (View Minutes) d. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- , A Resolution Approving The Application For Land And Water Conservation Fund Grant For The Newman Community Conservation Area And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute All Documents Pertaining To The Grant. (View Report)
e. Approve A One (1) Year Contract Extension With CSG Consultants For Building Inspection And Plan Check Services. (View Report)
9. Public Hearings
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- , A Resolution Adopting The City Of Newman 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan. (View Report)
10. Regular Business
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- , A Resolution Accepting The CMAQ-Kern Street Pedestrian Improvements, Federal-Aid Project No. Cml-5172(032) As Complete, Authorizing The City Clerk To Record A Notice Of Completion With Stanislaus County, And Authorizing The City Manager To Make Final Payment Of Retention Funds To TBS Contractors. (View Report)
b. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- , A Resolution Accepting Bid And Awarding Contract To TBS Contractors For The Highway 33 And Inyo Avenue Intersection Improvements, FederalAid Project No. Stpl-5172(024) And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute The Agreements. (View Report)
11. Items From District Five Stanislaus County Supervisor.
12. Items From The City Manager And Staff.
13. Items From City Council Members.
14. Adjournment.
Calendar of Events
January 25 – City Council - 6:00 P.M.
February 8 – City Council - 6:00 P.M.
February 17 – Planning Commission – 6:00 P.M.
February 21 – Presidents’ Day Holiday – City Offices Closed.
February 22 – City Council - 6:00 P.M.
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
1 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description 209 Multimedia Corp 18-01-6640 $ 18,000.00 119971 1/13/2022 Covid Relief Grant & No Interest Loan/ Westside Index
209 Multimedia Corp 18-00-1040 $ 7,000.00 119971 1/13/2022 Covid Relief Grant & No Interest Loan/ Westside Index
$ 25,000.00 119971 Total
Amazon Capital Services 10-22-6300 $ 95.11 119972 1/13/2022 Pens Amazon Capital Services 10-22-6300 $ 43.39 119972 1/13/2022 Tube, Connector for Gas Detectors $ 138.50 119972 Total
Animal Damage Management, Inc 69-47-6200 $ 810.00 119973 1/13/2022 Gopher, Ground Squirrel, Vole Control@ Sherman, Barrington
Pa
$ 810.00 119973 Total
Bertolotti Newman Disposal, Inc 10-41-6200 $ 71,519.02 119974 1/13/2022 Monthly Contract Garbage Service/December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal, Inc 10-00-5080 $ (13,350.22) 119974 1/13/2022 Monthly Contract Garbage Service/December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal, Inc 10-00-5733 $ (4,767.93) 119974 1/13/2022 Monthly Contract Garbage Service/December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal, Inc 10-00-5730 $ 18,118.15 119974 1/13/2022 Monthly Contract Garbage Service/December 2021
$ 71,519.02 119974 Total
Bertolotti Newman Disposal 10-33-6220 $ 78.00 119975 1/13/2022 26 Yard Trash Bin & Street Sweeping
Debris/ December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal 69-47-6220 $ 78.00 119975 1/13/2022 26 Yard Trash Bin & Street Sweeping
Debris/ December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal 10-33-6220 $ 78.00 119975 1/13/2022 40 Yard Trash Bin Dumping@ Corp
Yard/ December 2021
Bertolotti Newman Disposal 69-47-6220 $ 78.00 119975 1/13/2022 40 Yard Trash Bin Dumping@ Corp
Yard/ December 2021
$ 312.00 119975 Total
Brooks Patty 10-22-6690 $ 250.00 119976 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for Training/ Brooks $ 250.00 119976 Total
BUSINESS CARD 63-56-6200 $ 4.67 119977 1/13/2022 Amazon Prime BUSINESS CARD 60-50-6200 $ 4.67 119977 1/13/2022 Amazon Prime BUSINESS CARD 10-44-6200 $ 4.67 119977 1/13/2022 Amazon Prime BUSINESS CARD 10-14-6300 $ 30.24 119977 1/13/2022 Electric Staplers BUSINESS CARD 60-50-6300 $ 30.23 119977 1/13/2022 Electric Staplers BUSINESS CARD 63-56-6300 $ 30.23 119977 1/13/2022 Electric Staplers BUSINESS CARD 10-22-6690 $ 26.40 119977 1/13/2022 Training Lunch BUSINESS CARD 10-22-6690 $ 16.18 119977 1/13/2022 ASHI Instructor Registration BUSINESS CARD 60-50-6200 $ 26.67 119977 1/13/2022 Hughes Net BUSINESS CARD 63-56-6200 $ 26.66 119977 1/13/2022 Hughes Net BUSINESS CARD 10-14-6200 $ 26.66 119977 1/13/2022 Hughes Net BUSINESS CARD 10-21-6420 $ 149.98 119977 1/13/2022 Internet Service Newman to Ceres/PD/ 1-6-22 to
2-5-22
$ 377.26 119977 Total
CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC 10-02-6200 $ 1,000.00 119978 1/13/2022 Grant writing/Lobbying CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC 60-50-6200 $ 1,000.00 119978 1/13/2022 Grant writing/Lobbying CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC 63-56-6200 $ 1,000.00 119978 1/13/2022 Grant writing/Lobbying $ 3,000.00 119978 Total
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 8.68 119979 1/13/2022 Christmas Decorations
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
2 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 39.98 119979 1/13/2022 Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-45-6739 $ 65.41 119979 1/13/2022 Teen Center Snack Bar Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 72.92 119979 1/13/2022 Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 37.75 119979 1/13/2022 Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-45-6739 $ 38.97 119979 1/13/2022 Teen Center Snack Bar Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 129.20 119979 1/13/2022 Mayors' Meeting Supplies Cardmember Service 10-07-6300 $ 3.79 119979 1/13/2022 Lighhtbulbs Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 26.95 119979 1/13/2022 Mayors' Meeting Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 593.31 119979 1/13/2022 Mayors' Meeting Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 3.29 119979 1/13/2022 Mayors' Meeting Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 5.24 119979 1/13/2022 Mayors' Meeting Supplies Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 441.94 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 1,053.20 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 34.76 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 241.21 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 72.35 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 123.83 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-45-6722 $ 45.57 119979 1/13/2022 Footballs Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 226.88 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ 422.55 119979 1/13/2022 Newman Chamber 4 Kids Holiday Donations
Cardmember Service 60-50-6530 $ 16.30 119979 1/13/2022 Windshield Wipers Cardmember Service 63-56-6530 $ 16.30 119979 1/13/2022 Windshield Wipers Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ (16.23) 119979 1/13/2022 Return of Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ (32.46) 119979 1/13/2022 Return of Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ (32.46) 119979 1/13/2022 Return of Christmas Decorations Cardmember Service 10-01-6620 $ (32.46) 119979 1/13/2022 Return of Christmas Decorations $ 3,606.77 119979 Total
CBA (ADMIN FEES) 10-00-2261 $ 286.00 119980 1/13/2022 Dental-Vision Admin Fees/ January 2022
$ 286.00 119980 Total
CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-44-6660 $ 233.63 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-44-6670 $ 116.81 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-07-6300 $ 58.41 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-21-6300 $ 58.41 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-07-6665 $ 29.20 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-22-6300 $ 29.20 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-44-6300 $ 29.21 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10-46-6300 $ 29.20 119981 1/13/2022 Miscellaneous Cleaning Supplies $ 584.07 119981 Total
City of Ceres 10-21-6615 $ 16,000.00 119982 1/13/2022 Dispatch Service 11-1-21 to 11-30-21
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
3 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description City of Ceres 10-21-6615 $ 16,000.00 119982 1/13/2022 Dispatch Service 12-1-21 to 12-31-21
$ 32,000.00 119982 Total
Derotic Emergency Equipment 60-50-7105 $ 1,015.12 119983 1/13/2022 Upfitting of 2021 Chevy Bolt
Derotic Emergency Equipment 63-56-7105 $ 1,015.12 119983 1/13/2022 Upfitting of 2021 Chevy Bolt
$ 2,030.24 119983 Total
Dittos 10-21-6300 $ 457.61 119984 1/13/2022 Citation Books $ 457.61 119984 Total
DJ Francis Electric 60-50-6200 $ 300.00 119985 1/13/2022 Repair on Pit $ 300.00 119985 Total
Empire Insignias 10-21-6300 $ 255.00 119986 1/13/2022 Police Shoulder Patches $ 255.00 119986 Total
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 60-50-6200 $ 5,072.00 119987 1/13/2022 Inorganic Analysis, Support Analysis
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 60-50-6200 $ 329.00 119987 1/13/2022 Inorganic Analysis, Support Analysis
FGL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 60-50-6200 $ 369.00 119987 1/13/2022 Inorganic Analysis, Support Analysis
$ 5,770.00 119987 Total
GARTON TRACTOR 63-56-6530 $ 376.11 119988 1/13/2022 Filters $ 376.11 119988 Total
GEORGE W. LOWRY, INC 60-50-6500 $ 1,590.84 119989 1/13/2022 400 Gallons Unleaded Gas Delivered @ WWTP
$ 1,590.84 119989 Total
Guerrero's Tire and Auto Repair, LLC 10-22-6530 $ 900.76 119990 1/13/2022 1 New Tire on E55 $ 900.76 119990 Total
Hendrix Justin 60-50-6675 $ 114.00 119991 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for CEQA Filing, Parking/ Hendrix Hendrix Justin 10-06-6690 $ 2.50 119991 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for CEQA Filing, Parking/ Hendrix Hendrix Justin 10-06-6625 $ 42.23 119991 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for Training/ Hendrix $ 158.73 119991 Total
INFOSEND, INC 60-50-6200 $ 1,129.41 119992 1/13/2022 Utility Bill& Late Nottce Mailing November 2021
INFOSEND, INC 63-56-6200 $ 1,129.40 119992 1/13/2022 Utility Bill& Late Nottce Mailing November 2021
INFOSEND, INC 60-50-6200 $ 1,164.18 119992 1/13/2022 Utility Bill& Late Nottce
Mailing December 2021
INFOSEND, INC 63-56-6200 $ 1,164.17 119992 1/13/2022 Utility Bill& Late Nottce Mailing December 2021
$ 4,587.16 119992 Total
IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 10-33-6300 $ 23.25 119993 1/13/2022 Boots IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 63-56-6300 $ 22.47 119993 1/13/2022 Boots IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 10-33-6300 $ 2.35 119993 1/13/2022 Rainsuits IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 10-44-6300 $ 2.35 119993 1/13/2022 Rainsuits IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 60-50-6300 $ 9.97 119993 1/13/2022 Rainsuits IRRIGATION DESIGN & CONST 63-56-6300 $ 8.79 119993 1/13/2022 Rainsuits $ 69.18 119993 Total
J Bird Abatement 10-07-6200 $ 2,000.00 119994 1/13/2022 Trapping, Flock Reduction $ 2,000.00 119994 Total
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
4 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description McKesson Medical-Surgical 10-22-6300 $ 52.49 119995 1/13/2022 Flashlights $ 52.49 119995 Total
Mechanics Bank 10-14-6120 $ 247.50 119996 1/13/2022 HSA 1st Half Deposit Correction/ Torres
Mechanics Bank 60-50-6120 $ 247.50 119996 1/13/2022 HSA 1st Half Deposit Correction/ Torres
Mechanics Bank 63-56-6120 $ 255.00 119996 1/13/2022 HSA 1st Half Deposit Correction/ Torres
$ 750.00 119996 Total
MID VALLEY IT, INC 10-21-6200 $ 2,002.00 119997 1/13/2022 IT CONTRACT/PD MID VALLEY IT, INC 10-14-6200 $ 1,001.00 119997 1/13/2022 IT CONTRACT/FIN MID VALLEY IT, INC 63-56-6200 $ 1,001.00 119997 1/13/2022 IT CONTRACT/WATR MID VALLEY IT, INC 60-50-6200 $ 1,001.00 119997 1/13/2022 IT CONTRACT/SEWR $ 5,005.00 119997 Total
Moreno Miguel 10-33-6150 $ 57.01 119998 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for Work Pants/ Moreno Moreno Miguel 69-47-6150 $ 57.02 119998 1/13/2022 Reimbursement for Work Pants/ Moreno $ 114.03 119998 Total
Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-21-6530 $ 63.04 119999 1/13/2022 Battery Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 156.33 119999 1/13/2022 Battery Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6300 $ 13.41 119999 1/13/2022 Socket Set Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-33-6530 $ 11.84 119999 1/13/2022 Oll Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 388.09 119999 1/13/2022 Oll Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 422.49 119999 1/13/2022 Filters Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-22-6530 $ 2.90 119999 1/13/2022 Reflector Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 27.42 119999 1/13/2022 Windshield Wipers Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 2.90 119999 1/13/2022 Fuse Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 60-50-6530 $ 86.19 119999 1/13/2022 Red Tacky Grease Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-22-6530 $ 23.51 119999 1/13/2022 Clamp Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-22-6530 $ 85.43 119999 1/13/2022 Tri-Tap Cen-Cal Auto & Truck Parts/ NAPA 10-22-6530 $ 71.18 119999 1/13/2022 Charger $ 1,354.73 119999 Total
NEWMAN MINI MART 63-56-6500 $ 165.96 120000 1/13/2022 Reimbursment For Gas Comped Due To Gas Card Not
Working/ Garza
$ 165.96 120000 Total
Nutrien Ag Solutions Inc 60-50-6230 $ 8,701.65 120001 1/13/2022 285300 lbs Gypsum $ 8,701.65 120001 Total
Operating Engineers Public & Misc Employees 10-00-2260 $ 824.00 120002 1/13/2022 Health Insurance Premium/ February
2022 /Caetano
$ 824.00 120002 Total
CITY OF PATTERSON 10-03-6200 $ 660.00 120003 1/13/2022 City Council Video Service/ December
2021
$ 660.00 120003 Total
P G & E 10-07-6410 $ 1,645.78 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 10-22-6410 $ 1,717.93 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 10-33-6410 $ 8,413.71 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
5 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description P G & E 10-44-6410 $ 1,242.62 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 10-45-6410 $ 239.50 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 60-50-6410 $ 21,538.53 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 63-56-6510 $ 17,345.50 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 69-47-6410 $ 2,583.51 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use P G & E 10-46-6410 $ 316.91 120004 1/13/2022 Gas & Electric Use $ 55,043.99 120004 Total
Purchase Power 10-14-6330 $ 336.17 120005 1/13/2022 Postage Meter Refill Purchase Power 60-50-6330 $ 336.17 120005 1/13/2022 Postage Meter Refill Purchase Power 63-56-6330 $ 336.16 120005 1/13/2022 Postage Meter Refill $ 1,008.50 120005 Total
R.J. Ricciardi, Inc, CPAs 10-14-6205 $ 729.17 120006 1/13/2022 Professional Services Rendered Through 12-31-21
R.J. Ricciardi, Inc, CPAs 60-50-6205 $ 729.17 120006 1/13/2022 Professional Services Rendered Through 12-31-21
R.J. Ricciardi, Inc, CPAs 63-56-6205 $ 729.16 120006 1/13/2022 Professional Services Rendered Through 12-31-21
$ 2,187.50 120006 Total
ROCHA BACKHOE SERVICE, IN 63-56-6200 $ 1,267.50 120007 1/13/2022 Fire Hydrant Replacement ROCHA BACKHOE SERVICE, IN 10-33-6300 $ 1,795.00 120007 1/13/2022 12.08 Tons of Cold Blacktop, 12.10 Tons AB Truck Rental
$ 3,062.50 120007 Total
Solar Integrated Fund III 60-50-6410 $ 6,822.96 120008 1/13/2022 Solar Production Period 11-1-21 to
11-30-21
$ 6,822.96 120008 Total
Springbrook Holding Company, LLC 10-14-6310 $ 538.00 120009 1/13/2022 Web payments December 2021 Springbrook Holding Company, LLC 60-50-6310 $ 538.00 120009 1/13/2022 Web payments December 2021 Springbrook Holding Company, LLC 63-56-6310 $ 538.00 120009 1/13/2022 Web payments December 2021 $ 1,614.00 120009 Total
STAPLES ADVANTAGE 10-21-6300 $ 11.32 120010 1/13/2022 Paper $ 11.32 120010 Total
Stewart & Jasper Orchards 60-50-6200 $ 2,513.70 120011 1/13/2022 Hulling & Shelling Service Fees $ 2,513.70 120011 Total
T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 10-14-6300 $ 8.45 120012 1/13/2022 Custom Stamp T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 60-50-6300 $ 8.44 120012 1/13/2022 Custom Stamp T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 63-56-6300 $ 8.44 120012 1/13/2022 Custom Stamp T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 10-14-6300 $ (19.07) 120012 1/13/2022 Return of Receipt Rolls T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 60-50-6300 $ (19.07) 120012 1/13/2022 Return of Receipt Rolls T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 63-56-6300 $ (19.07) 120012 1/13/2022 Return of Receipt Rolls T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 10-21-6300 $ 32.35 120012 1/13/2022 Envelopes, Face Masks T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 10-14-6300 $ 83.82 120012 1/13/2022 Correction Tape, Paper, Pens T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 60-50-6300 $ 83.81 120012 1/13/2022 Correction Tape, Paper, Pens T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 63-56-6300 $ 83.81 120012 1/13/2022 Correction Tape, Paper, Pens T.H.E. OFFICE CITY 10-45-6300 $ 17.46 120012 1/13/2022 Markers
AP Check Register
January 6, 2022 through January 20, 2022
6 of 6
Vendor Fund-Dept-Acct Amount Check # Check date Description $ 269.37 120012 Total
TPX Communications 10-22-6420 $ 251.03 120013 1/13/2022 Telephone Service/Long Distance December 2021
TPX Communications 10-45-6420 $ 127.43 120013 1/13/2022 Telephone Service/Long Distance December 2021
TPX Communications 10-14-6420 $ 127.43 120013 1/13/2022 Telephone Service/Long Distance December 2021
TPX Communications 60-50-6420 $ 127.43 120013 1/13/2022 Telephone Service/Long Distance December 2021
TPX Communications 63-56-6420 $ 127.43 120013 1/13/2022 Telephone Service/Long Distance December 2021
$ 760.75 120013 Total
True Blue Veterinary Group 10-21-6208 $ 1,540.00 120014 1/13/2022 Menthly Contract Animal Control/ December 2021
$ 1,540.00 120014 Total
Verizon Wireless 10-06-6420 $ 62.09 120015 1/13/2022 Mobile laptop access 11-19-21 to 12-18-21
Verizon Wireless 63-56-6420 $ 38.01 120015 1/13/2022 Mobile laptop access 11-19-21 to 12-18-21
Verizon Wireless 10-22-6615 $ 114.03 120015 1/13/2022 Mobile laptop access 11-19-21 to 12-18-21
Verizon Wireless 10-21-6420 $ 304.08 120015 1/13/2022 Mobile laptop access 11-19-21 to 12-18-21
$ 518.21 120015 Total
Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting 17-36-7779 $ 3,404.00 120016 1/13/2022 Project J-445 CDFW $ 3,404.00 120016 Total
Westside Water Conditioning 10-14-6300 $ 16.25 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21 & 12-21-21 City Hall
Westside Water Conditioning 60-50-6300 $ 16.25 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21 & 12-21-21 City Hall
Westside Water Conditioning 63-56-6300 $ 16.25 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21 & 12-21-21 City Hall
Westside Water Conditioning 10-21-6200 $ 19.50 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21 /PD
Westside Water Conditioning 60-50-6200 $ 19.50 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21/ WWTP
Westside Water Conditioning 60-50-6200 $ 24.38 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21/ Corp Yard
Westside Water Conditioning 63-56-6200 $ 24.37 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery 12-8-21/ Corp Yard
Westside Water Conditioning 10-22-6200 $ 48.75 120017 1/13/2022 Bottle Water Delivery
12-8-21 & 12-21-21/ FD
$ 185.25 120017 Total
$ 252,949.16 Grand Total
MINUTES
NEWMAN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 11, 2022
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 6:00 P.M., 938 FRESNO STREET
NOTICE: THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 59453, SUBDIVISION (e) OF THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54950, ET SEQ.), CITY OF NEWMAN RESOLUTION NO. 2021-59, AND THE FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
GIVEN THE STATE OF EMERGENCY REGARDING THE THREAT OF COVID-19, THIS MEETING WILL NOT BE PHYSICALLY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
All MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE AND COMMENT VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING AT https://zoom.us/j/91675127873 PASSCODE: 643888 AND VIA TELECONFERENCE BY CALLING (669) 900-6833, MEETING ID: 916 7512 7873 PASSCODE: 643888
1. Call To Order - Mayor Graham 6:00 P.M.
2. Pledge Of Allegiance.
3. Invocation - Council Member McDonald.
4. Roll Call - PRESENT: McDonald, Ball, Pimentel, And Mayor Graham.
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Candea.
5. Declaration Of Conflicts Of Interest – None.
6. Ceremonial Matters.
a. Presentation - Stanislaus County Voter Education Information Update – Donna Linder, County Clerk–Recorder, Registrar Of Voters.
Donna Linder, County Clerk–Recorder, Registrar Of Voters, Apprised Everyone About The Upcoming Voter Education Workshops To Provide Information About Various Election Related Topics And To Answer Questions About Voting And Elections. Linder Also Noted That The County Was Recruiting For Part-Time Seasonal Elections Employees And Volunteers.
7. Items from the Public - Non-Agenda Items – None.
8. Consent Calendar
a. Waive All Readings Of Ordinances And Resolutions Except By Title. b. Approval Of Warrants.
c. Approval Of Minutes Of The December 14, 2021 And December 21, 2021 Meetings. d. Adopt Resolution 2022-01, Approving The Local Transportation Fund Claim For Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Other Purposes; And Authorize The Finance Director To Execute The Claim On Behalf Of The City Of Newman.
e. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-02, A Resolution Accepting The Capital Facilities Fees Annual Report.
f. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-03, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Newman Approving The Application For California Department Of Parks And Recreation, Rural Recreation And Tourism Program Grant Funds For The Newman Nature Park And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute All Documents.
g. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-04, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Newman Making Findings In Accordance With AB 361 And Government Code Section 54953(E), Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings For The Legislative Bodies Of The Newman City Council.
ACTION: On A Motion By Ball Seconded By McDonald, The Consent Calendar Was Approved By The Following Vote: AYES: McDonald, Ball, Pimentel, And Mayor Graham; NOES: None; ABSENT:
Candea; NOT PARTICIPATING: None.
9. Public Hearings - None.
10. Regular Business - None.
11. Items From District Five Stanislaus County Supervisor.
Supervisor Condit Reminded Everyone That The Next West Side Healthcare Taskforce Meeting Would Be On Thursday, January 13th At 3:30 P.M. Condit Noted That Increasing Medical Facilities On The West Side Was One Of His Top Priorities And Noted That The Taskforce Would Be Taking A Site Tour In February Of A Potential Future Facility Location. He Noted That The Site Would Take Place In Patterson And Asked That A Representative Of The Newman City Council Be Present For Said Tour.
Mayor Graham Asked Supervisor Condit To Send The City Council The Details Of The Site Tour And Assured Him That A City Representative Would Attend Said Tour.
12. Items From The City Manager And Staff.
City Manager Holland Reported That The City Would Remain Closed For At Least A Week Due To COVID Protocol Issues. Holland Noted That The Indoor Mask Requirement Had Been Extended Until Mid-February. He Thanked The Council For Allowing Staff To Continue To Pursue Grant Funding For The Proposed Nature Park. Holland Noted That City Offices Would Be Closed On Monday, January 17th In Observance Of The Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday. He Mentioned That Staff Was Working On Complying With SB 1383 And Noted That Residential Yard/Food Waste Collection Program Would Begin In April. He Stated That The City’s Thoughts And Prayers Were With Deputy Fulmer, The Young Man Who Lost His Life And Their Families After The Recent Tragic Accident.
Council Member McDonald Thanked City Staff For Recently Distributing COVID Tests Locally.
Recreation Director/Community Liaison Mendoza Noted That The Youth Basketball Season Would Begin On The Upcoming Saturday And Conclude In February. Mendoza Noted That Staff Was Working On A Schedule Of Community Events For The 2022 Calendar Year.
Finance Director Humphries Reported That The Annual Street Report Had Been Completed And Filed With The State Controller’s Office. Humphries Noted That The Annual Financial Transactions Report Would Be Submitted To The State By The End Of The Month.
Public Works Director Reyes Thanked The City Council For Allowing Staff To Continue To Seek Grants For the Proposed Nature Park. Reyes Noted That The City Had Hired A Bird Abatement Company To Humanely Trap The Pigeons At The Intersection Of Highway 33 And Kern Street. She Mentioned That The Bid Opening For the Highway 33/Inyo Intersection Would Take Place On The Following Afternoon And Indicated That The Kern Street Project Would Be Out To Bid Soon.
Council Member McDonald Asked How The Highway 33/Inyo Intersection Project Would Affect The Surrounding Businesses.
Public Works Director Reyes Stated That Only Approximately Two Additional Feet Of Right-Of-Way Was Needed For The Project And Noted That The Project Would Ultimately Make The Intersection Safer. Reyes Also Noted That Plans Were In Place To Handle Traffic During Construction And Noted That The Businesses Would Still Have Ingress And Egress To Their Sites.
Chief Bowen Noted That No Outdoor Burning Was Allowed In The City Unless It Was Cooking.
Bowen Noted That Heavy Fog Was Being Forecasted For The Week And Reminded Everyone To Drive Safely.
13. Items From City Council Members.
Council Member McDonald Encouraged Everyone To Be Safe.
Council Member Ball Noted That He Could Not Attend The Upcoming Operation Area Council And Disaster Meeting On January 20th.
Council Member Pimentel Volunteered To Attend The Operation Area Council And Disaster Meeting In Place Of Council Member Ball.
Mayor Graham Encouraged Everyone To Be Safe And Stay Healthy.
14. Adjourn To Closed Session - 6:27 P.M.
a. Conference With Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant To Paragraph (1) Subdivision (d) Of Section 54956.9 Of California Government Code. Name Of Case: In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District Of Ohio Case Number 1:17-MD-2804.
b. Return To Open Session - 6:37 P.M.
Staff Was Provided Direction Regarding Item 14.a.
15. Adjournment.
ACTION: On A Motion By Council Member Pimentel Seconded By Council Member McDonald And Unanimously Carried, The Meeting Was Adjourned At 6:38 P.M.
City of Newman ,
Director of Public Works Office
Memorandum
Date: January 25, 2022
Agenda Item: 8.d.
To: City of Newman City Council · f) .A~
From: Kathryn Reyes, Director of Public Works ~ J(...V~ Subject: Agenda Item No. 8.d. -Adopt Resolution approving the application for Land and Water Conservation Fund for the Newnan Community Conservation Area (NCCA) Project and Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents.
Under Public Law 88-578 Congress has authorized the establishment of a federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant program for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes. The California Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for administration of the program in California
The City of Newman's applied for a Proposition 68 Grant to construct the Newman Nature Park and was not funded. The Newman Environmental Wetland System (NEWS) has been funded with the Prop 1 Grant. Some components of the already funded NEWS project were not allowable expenses under the Prop 1 Grant. The Land and Water Conservation Fund is applicable to our project and these funds can be used for components of the Nature Park including the trail and Connections of the different projects within the Newman Community Conservation Area.
As part of the application process a Resolution is required authorizing the City Manager to submit the grant application and execute all documents.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Authorizing the application to the Land and Water Conservation Fund RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWMAN APPROVING
THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERV ATON FUND GRANT FOR THE
NEWMAN COMMUNITY CONSERVATION AREA AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE GRANT WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized the establishment of a federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant-In-Aid program, providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for administration of the program in the State, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing Application by local agencies under the program; and
WHEREAS, the applicant certifies by resolution the approval of the Application and the availability of Matching funds prior to submission of the Application to the State; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newman hereby:
1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance for the proposed Newman Community Conservation Area Project.
2. Agrees to abide by Section 6(f)(3) of Public Law 88-578 which states "No property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the National Secretary of the Interior, be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve such conversion only if he finds it to be in accord with the then existing comprehensive statewide outdoor recreation plan and only upon such conditions as he deems necessary to assure the substitution of other recreation properties of at least equal fair market value and of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location."
3. Certifies that said agency has Matching funds from eligible sour(s) and can finance 100 percent of the Project, which up to half may be reimbursed; and
4. Appoints the City Manager as agent of the Applicant to conduct all negotiations and execute and submit all documents, including but not limited to, applications, contracts, amendments, payment requests, and compliance with all applicable current state and federal laws which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project.
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newman held on the 25th, day of January, 2022 by Council Member , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded and it was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
APPROVED:
ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Newman
City Clerk of the City of Newman
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Newman City Council
Agenda Item: 8.e.
City Council Meeting
of January 25, 2022
APPROVE ONE (1) YEAR CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH CSG CONSULTANTS FOR BUILDING INSPECTION AND PLAN CHECK SERVICES.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve one (1) year contract extension with CSG Consultants for building inspection and plan check services.
BACKGROUND:
The City had a contract with Precision Inspection Company for building permit and inspection services since'the early l 990's. In April 2012, Precision Inspection Company merged with CSG Consulting, Inc. ("CSG"), who assumed Precision's contract with the City. In 2018, the City entered into a new three (3) year agreement with CSG to provide building permit services to the City.
In the summer of2020, CSG approached the City with a desire to restructure their agreement. The focus of the changes was on compensation. CSG indicated that the current methodology no longer met their financial requirements. After several attempts to find a suitable resolution, CSG provided the City sixty ( 60) day notice to terminate the agreement as per Section 11.2 of the agreement. During this 60-day period of negotiations, the City and CSG finalized a one-year agreement under the new compensation schedule.
ANALYSIS:
The City had some apprehension about entering into a long-term agreement with CSG under the new current compensation schedule. While the first year was a small sample size in terms of the number and types of permits that were issued, an analysis of the year indicates that permit fees were sufficient to cover the cost of processing the permits and pay CSG for plan check and inspection services. Therefore, staff is comfortable extending the contract through calendar year 2022.
FISCAL IMP ACT:
Minimal. Staff will continue to monitor the building permit fee structure to ensure the proper amount is being collected.
CONCLUSION:
After one full year under the new compensation schedule with CSG Consulting for inspection and plan check services, it appears that building permit fees are sufficient to cover the new compensation schedule. Therefore, staff recommends Council approve a year one extension for CSG Consulting for inspection and plan check services.
ATTACHMENTS: ,
1. Existing Agreement
Respectfully Submitted,
_,_..,..<91-ID?
Michael E. Holland
City Manager
First Amendment to the Building Permit Services Agree1pent This First Amendment to the Building Permit Services Agreement ("First Amendment") is made and entered into by and between the City of Newman ("City"), and CSG Consultants, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant may be referred to hereinafter as a"~" or collectively as the "Parties." There are no other parties to this First Amendment.
RECITALS
A. On July 5, 2018, City and Consultant entered a Building Permit Services Agreement ("Original Agreement") for Consultant to provide building permit and inspection services to City.
B. City and Consultant have agreed to amend the Original Agreement to modify Consultant's fee structure for providing building permit and inspection services to City.
Beginning on the Effective Date of this First Amendment, City shall pay Consultant an hourly fee for all services provided to City, as further described in this First Amendment.
C. The purpose of this First Amendment is to modify Consultant's fee structure for the remaining term ofthe Original Agreement. All terms of the Original Agreement shall remain in effect, except where amended herein.
AGREEMENT
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this First Amendment. In the event of any inconsistencies between the recitals and sections l through 13 of this First Amendment, sections I through 13 will prevail.
Section 2. Effect of Original Agreement. Except as provided herein, the defined terms used in this First Amendment shall have the same meaning as the defined terms in the Original Agreement. Unless expressly amended by this First Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. . If any terms or provisions of this First Amendment conflict with terms and provisions of the Original Agreement, the terms and provisions of this First Amendment shall control.
Section 3. Definition of Agreement. The Original Agreement, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, together with this First Amendment, collectively make and are defined together to collectively be the "Agreement".
Section 4. Effective Date. This First Amendmt!nl shall bt: t:ffective on September 15, 2020.
If the Parties execute this First Amendment after September 15, 2020, then the First Amendment shall be effective the date on which the last of the Parties executes this First Amendment (the "Effective Date").
{CW097504.6}
Section 5. Amendments. This First Amendment makes the following changes to the Original Agreement:
(a) Section 3:2 is hereby deleted and replaced with a new Section 3.2, as follows:
3.2. City agrees to pay Consultant for building permit and inspection services provided to City at the fee structure and hourly rates described in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall bill inspccliun activities according to the agreed upon inspection times described in Exhibit C, attached and incorporated herein. (b) Section 3 .3 is hereby deleted.
(c) Section 3.4 is hereby deleted and replaced with new Section 3.4, as follows:
3.4. The City agrees to pay Consultant an hourly fee for building permit and inspection services provided to City, as further described in Exhibit B.
Hourly fees will increase each year based on Cost of Living per the Consumer Price Index Percentage. ·
(d) Section 3.5 is hereby deleted and replaced with a new Section 3.5, as follows:
3.5. Request for payment by Consultant shall occur by written monthly invoice submitted to City. Consultant agrees to provide City, in a form acceptable to City and in reasonable and understandable detail, a description of the building permit and inspection services provided for which payment is requested.
(e) In Section 3.8, the reference to "Section 3.6" is hereby deleted and replaced with "Section 3.5."
(f) Exhibit A of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with Exhibit B of this First Amendment.
(g) Exhibit C of this First Amendment, describing billing times related to inspections, is hereby added to the Original Agreement.
Section 6. Exhibits. The following ex~ibits are expressly incorporated as a part of this First Amendment:
{CW097504.6}
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Building Permit Services Agreement
Scope of Services & Fee Schedule
Inspection Times
Section 7. Integrated Agreement. The Agreement contains all of the agreements of the Parties and all previous understandings, negotiations, and agreements of the Parties.
Section 8. · Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this First Amendment are declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this First Amendment, which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties herein.
Section 9. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed simultaneously and, in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall be deemed one and the same instrument.
Section_ IO. Authority. All Parties to this First Amendment warrant and represent that they have the power and authority to enter into this First Amendment and the names, titles, and capacities herein stated on behalf of any entities, persons, states, or firms represented or purported to be represented by such entities, persons, states, or firms and that all former requirements necessary or required by state or federal law in order to enter into t4is First Amendment have been fully complied with. ·
Section 11. Document Preparation. This First Amendment will not be construed against the Party preparing it, but will be construed as if prepared by all Parties.
Section 12. Advice of Legal Counsel. Each Party acknowledges that it has reviewed this First Amendment with its own legal counsel and based upon the advice of that counsel, freely entered into this First Amendment.
Section 13. Attorney's Fees and Costs. If any action at law or in equity, including action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret provisions of this First Amendment, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, which may be set by the court in the same action, or in a separate aCtion brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which su~h Party may be entitled.
{CW097504.6}
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment by the Parties shall take effect upon the Effective Date set forth above. ·
CONSULTANT: CITY:
CSG Consultants. Inc. City ofNewman7
A California Corporation, Tax ID; 91-2053749 A .California Municipal Corporation ;!Jl,=- By: ___________ _ By: --~,._....-.rr"-"'-....;;;;::a-=~--- Cyrus Kianpour, President Michael Holland, City Manager Date: September 16,, 2020 Date: _/"--<.o ____ L. ____ o __ APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Nubia t. Uoldstem, <..:ity Attorney
{CW097504.6}
EXHIBIT A
Building Permit Services Agreement
{CW097504.6}
EXHIBIT B
Scope of Services & Fee Schedule l
{CW09'7504.6}
{CW097504.6}
EXHIBIT C
Inspection Times
City of Newman
Inspection Times
September 15, 2020
Types of Building Permits
Plumbing
One Inspection/ Final 30minutes
Gas Test 30minutes
Roof Drains 30minutes
Rouldi Plumb 30minutes
Sewer 30minutes
Shower Pan 30minutes .... -...... __
Under-Floor Slab 30minutes
Water Heater 30minutes
Water Service 30minutes
a _._.ca.~ -- I •la.--.a.t-- l'lUUf'-IUJI/ "'"'"'' a"IUI I Electrical - Under Floor 30minutes
Mechanical • Under Floor 30minutes
Raised Floors (very rare) 30minutes
Under Floor Frame 30minutes
Plumbing- Under Slab 30minutes
Sewer/Water 30minutes
Foundation 30minutes
Electrical - UFER/ Ground 30minutes
Shear Wall lhour
Sheathing
Rough Frame - - ...... ! .. ~E. ·- Plumbing - Rough
Mechanical- Rough
Electrical - Rough
Insulation- Walls/ Ceilin11: 30minutes
Stucco Wire/ lath 30minutes
Drvwall
Plumbing- Gas Test
Plumbing· Shower Pan 30minutes
Electrical~ Temporary Services 30minutes
Gas Meter Release 30minutes
Electrical Service 30minutes
Permit Final lhour
[CW097546.1}
Exhibit C
Roof Mount-Solar PV) Swimming Pool
Solar 30minutes Pre-Gunite (in11:round) 30minutes
One Inspection/ Final Underaround
.......... -.. ... -~!!a.Y ~CICklng/ Bondins "' .. _...... . .,_._..,... __ Rough Electrical Electrical Rough Mechanical
Service Panel if upgraded 30minutes Rough Plumb
-·-- -· Gas Pipe
HVAC Gas Test
One Inspection/ Final 30minutes Foundation
Under Floor Slab
A/C Unit Pre-Deck 30minutes
-- t llillll~ ~:;~!;:~te:"!!!:!! ~~~~!!":g {!~g!'"~~~~! Flue Pre-Plaster (inground) 30minutes
Furnace Permit Final 30minutes
Hoods
Rough New Single Family Resident (SFR)
Permit Final Electrical - Under Floor 30minutes
Mechanical • Under Floor
Sign Raised Floors (very rare)
One Inspection/ Final 30minutes Under Floor Frame 30minutes MountinR Plumbing- Under Slab 30minutes
Electrical Sewer/Water 30minutes
Monument I Pole Mount Signs Foundation 30minutes
Two Inspections Electrical - UFER/ Ground
Footing :JO minutes
Final 30minutes Shear Wall lhour
Sheath ins:
Re-Roof
Pre-Roof- Overlay 30minutes Rough Frame lhour
Pre-Roof-Tear-Off 30minutes Plumbing - Rough
Roof Nail- Reroof Tear-Off 30minutes Mechanical - Rough Permit Final 30minutes Electrical - Rough
Temporary Power Pole· Insulation- Walls/ Ceiling 30minutes One Inspection/ Final 30mlnutes
Stucco Wire/ Lath 30minutes
Water Softener Drywall
One Inspection/ Final 30minutes Plumbins:- Gas Test
- Patio Cover Plumbing· Shower Pan 30minutes .
Foundation/ FootinRS/ Setbacks 30minutes Electrical - Temporary Services 30minutes Frame 30minutes
Final 30minutes Gas Meter Release 30minutes
Electrical Service 30minutes
Permit Final ........ ..,.,. ___ . lhour
BUILDING INSPECTION
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
\
BUILDING PERMIT SERVICES AGREEMENT
DATED JULY 5, 2018
EXHIBIT B
City of Newman
Scope of Services & Fee Schedule
Effective September 15, 2020 ·
Consultant will provide combination building inspections to verify compliance with the City's latest adopted and amended building codes including, but not limited to, the following: T!tle 24 California Building Codes, parts 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 covering structural, fire, life safety, disabled access, energy conservation, CAL Green, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical installations.
Combin~tion field inspection shall include site inspections, writing correction notices and field reports, holding office hours, and answering in person or.telephone inquiries.
Inspection requests must be made one working day in advance. Contractor will bill inspections for the agreed upon inspection times in Exhibit C attached hereto.
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
City will pay .Consultant an hourly fee for plan reviews based on actual elapsed time.
Plan reviews will be completed in accordance with the following turnaround times:
- - -- ~ - - ---
TYPE OF REVIEW INITIAL REVIEW RE-CHECK
(BUSINESS DAYS) (BUSINESS DAYS)
Residential New Construction 10 5
1 Small Commercial Remodels I Tenant Improvements 10 5
I Revisions, Deferred Submittals, RFls 10 5
Large I Complex Commercial Projects* 10-15 5
*Turnaround time may vary with the complexity and magnitude of the project. Contractor will notify City's representative in advance to discuss the additional time should it determine that a complex review requires more than the time(s) stated above.
BUILDING PERMITS
City will pay Consultant a flat fee of $35.00 per permit that it reviews on behalf of City. {CW097524.2} 1OF2 ·
COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
As compensation for the abc:>ve services, City will pay Consultant in accordance with the following fee schedule incorporated below.
SERVICES HOURLY
Plans Examiner
Senior Plan~ Examiner
Principal Structural Engineer
Certified Building Official
Certified Residential Buildin_g lnseector
RATES
$98
$129
$129
$113
$87
Certified Comoinaiion 6uiiding ir.spectul $98
[ Permit Technician $67
Structural Engineer $128
Professional Civil En~neer $128
CASp Inspection I Consultation $98
Fire Plan Review $98
Code Enforcement Officer $98
[ Code Enforcement Supervisor $128
Training $110
IT Suee~rt re GreenVue Fusion __ _$ 150
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of ev~ry month for the services rendered during the previous month. Payments are due 30-days upon receipt of the invoice. Contractor will initiate an annual CPI rate increase based upon the applicable CPl-U for the City.
For overtime or weekend work requested by City, Consultant shall be compensated as follows:
~~~- ~ - ~----
OVERTIME WORK ADDITIONAL
Work performed in excess of 8-hours per day_
Work performed after 5 p.m.
Work .e_erforme~ on Saturdays
Work performed on Sundays
{CW097524.2} 2 OF 2
CHARGE
1.5 X Regular Hourly Rate
1.5 x ~eg~ l~r Hc;>~rly Rate ]
1.5 X Regular Hourly Rate ·
2~0 x Regular Hourly Rate
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Newman City Council
Agenda Item: 9.a.
City Council Meeting
of January 25, 2022
REPORT ON THE CITY OF NEWMAN 2022 HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN RECOMMENDATION:
1. Conduct Public Hearing,
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- adopting the 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP) is a policy-planning tool intended to guide the orderly development of land and improvements along the State Highway 33 Corridor (Highway Corridor). The purpose of the HSP is to implement Policy LU-3.7, Policy CD-7.5, and Action CD-7.2 of the City of Newman General Plan (General Plan), consistent with Government Code 65450. The HSP provides a 'bridge' between the General Plan's broad-based goals and the City ofNewman's Zoning Code's (City Code) detailed regulations.
The HSP regulates both the distribution and character of uses along the Highway Corridor and addresses four primary topics along the Highway Corridor, including land use, mobility, infrastructure, and urban design. Used as a tool to guide both new development and redevelopment, the HSP implements the General Plan's goal for the Highway Corridor of creating a more appealing and attractive commercial corridor centered around the City's Downtown District, as depicted in the Highway 33 Specific Plan. Additionally, the HSP focuses on pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular transportation improvements, which address transit needs, safety issues, implementation of the City's 'complete streets' goal, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.· California State Highway 33 provides the primary access to the City. The HSP area encompasses a corridor along State Highway 33 bound by Stuhr Road in the north, Union Pacific Railroad to the east, the Stanislaus County/Merced County Line to the south, and various parcel lines running approximately 300 feet to Y4 mile west of Highway 33.
Existing Conditions:
The HSP area contains a variety of existing land use conditions ranging from agricultural operations to modem super markets. Included within this range of existing uses are food processing industries, historic downtown buildings, residential units, and a variety of small, light industrial and highway commercial uses. Much of the property within the Highway Corridor is underutilized and lacks site improvements, landscaping, parking, and modem infrastructure.
Highway 33 is a two-lane State Route with graded shoulders on the north and south ends of town. Within city limits, the Highway Corridor widens to accommodate turning movements and on-street parking. Sidewalks, street lighting, and curb improvements are present along some stretches of the Highway Corridor. No unifying landscape or streetscape patterns exist along the full stretch of Highway 3 3.
Certain parcels at the northern end of the HSP area are within Stanislaus County jurisdiction; however, these parcels are included in the City's 2017 Northwest Newman Master Plan and are also included in the HSP area. The City's General Plan identifies the Northwest Newman Plan as Master Planning Area 3 and designates the land for residential and business park uses. The entirety of the Northwest Newman Master Plan Area is encompassed within the City's Primary Sphere of Influence. The Primary Sphere of Influence is land that is expected to be annexed into the City within the next ten or so years.
ANALYSIS:
Specific Plan Area Issues and Priorities:
Following is a summary of existing conditions and concerns that arose from the Community Questionnaire and Community Workshops and which are addressed in the HSP.
1. Improve safety along the Highway 33 Corridor.
2. Install I provide amenity improvements along the corridor, where appropriate.
3. Increase Downtown's identity and beautify Downtown with seating, lighting, signage, landscaping, etc.
4. Retain a small-town, rural/agricultural character of the Highway Corridor.
5. Improve outlying areas along the Highway Corridor.
6. Lack of consistent beautification, landscaping and streetscaping improvements.
7. Lack of bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the Highway Corridor.
Agenda Item: 9 .a.
8. Address dangerous pedestrian crossings along Highway 33, particularly the Sherman Parkway/Highway 33 intersection.
9. Design improvements with consideration to the Union Pacific Railroad R.O.W crossings I adjacency to the Highway Corridor.
Specific Plan Guiding Principles
The purpose of the HSP is to improve the safety, appearance, economic potential, and infrastructure deficiencies of the Highway Corridor. Consistent with the General Plan, the HSP promotes alternative modes of transportation, addresses safety concerns, provides unification and beautification elements and amenities, reduces emissions, and sets a vision for future changes along the Highway Corridor. The following HSP Guiding Principles define the kind of community the City's resident's desire, describe shared values and vision for the City, and ensure consistency with the General Plan.
1. Establish a unifying theme and vision for the Highway Corridor.
2. Strengthen and enhance Downtown as the Central Business District.
3. Improve the streetscape, safety, and circulation on Highway 33.
4. Encourage bicycle and pedestrian circulation.
5. Provide urban design guidelines for the HSP area.
6. Provide adequate infrastructure and utilities for the HSP area.
Specific Plan Overview and Organization:
The 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan updates the originally adopted 1996 Highway 33 Specific Plan. The 2022 document carries forward the same organization, including Section I - Introduction, Section II - Comprehensive Goals and Policies, Section III- Urban Design Guidelines, and Section IV - Implementation and Phasing. However, the updated document adds two new appendices: Appendix A -Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan and Appendix B - Community Outreach Summaries. The updated document updates the graphics and images found in the 1996 Highway 33 Specific Plan, as well as the text to correspond to current conditions and community feedback.
Section I includes a description of the HSP area and location, site constraints, and project goals. Section II identifies goals and policies to guide development within the HSP area, as well as establishes the extent, development intensity, and improvements for the Highway Corridor. Section III contains the HSP Urban Design Guidelines, which are intended to guide site design, architecture, and landscaping for projects located along the Highway Corridor. Section IV provides the necessary policy direction for implementation of the HSP, including procedures for phasing, financing, administration, and HSP amendments. Appendix A includes a detailed analysis of the preferred Highway Corridor improvements described and illustrated in Section II. Appendix B contains a detailed summary of the Community Questionnaire, and Virtual Community Workshops 1and2.
Land Use and Zoning:
HSP Figure 6: Land Use Plan is based on the adopted General Plan Land Use Designations and the Northwest Newman Master Plan Land Use Map. There are no amendments to the General Plan Land Use Designations Figure proposed as part of the HSP. The HSP utilizes the General Plan's adopted land use designations. There are a mix of land uses in the HSP area, which is consistent with the adopted goals of the HSP and intent of the General Plan. HSP Figure 7: Zoning Map illustrates the land within the Local Agency Formation Commission's (LAFCO) Primary Sphere of Influence, as well as the City's Zoning designations. Lands currently zoned within city limits will not be rezoned as part of the HSP adoption process; therefore, no zoning amendments are necessary. Future re-zoning, use permits, and subdivisions within the Highway Corridor shall be made consistent with the policies, specifications, and Urban Design Guidelines of the HSP. Specific development standards for the Highway Corridor are not specified, as the City's Code (Chapter 5: Zoning) shall prevail.
The following land use goal and policies are included in the HSP:
• Goal A: Provide for commercial development along the Highway Corridor that complements Downtown and is consistent with Newman's small-town character.
o Policy A.l - Preserve Newman's small-town qualities and the character of Downtown by enforcing development standards and encouraging compliance with design guidelines along the Highway Corridor.
o Policy A.2 - Establish pedestrian-scaled and pedestrian-oriented development and amenities along Highway 3 3 within the Downtown District.
Mobility:
Agenda Item: 9.a.
o Policy A.3 - Allow for the continuation of existing industrial land uses and facilities located along the Highway Corridor. Consider relocating existing industrial land uses outside of the Downtown District, but still within city limits. New industrial land uses and facilities will not be allowed in the Downtown District.
o Policy A.4 - Transition non-conforming uses to more appropriate sites within the City boundaries, where appropriate.
o Policy A.5 - Encourage primary land uses along the Highway Corridor which offer additional commercial or retail, and/or employment opportunities for residents or visitors.
Circulation improvements along the Highway Corridor are intended to improve function, pedestrian/bicyclist safety and comfort, maintain adequate operations and add aesthetic enhancement. HSP Figure~ 8.a and 8.b illustrate the circulation network and identify vehicular al)d pedestrian/bicyclist circulation routes along the Highway Corridor.
The following circulation goals and policies provide a framework for the development of street and circulation routes along the Highway Corridor.
• Goal B: Improve safety along the Highway Corridor for all modes of travel. o Policy B. l - Establish a multi-use pathway on the east side of Highway 33 paralleling the railroad right-of-way from Stuhr Road to Yolo Street.
o Policy B.2 - Install pedestrian-activated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at the following locations:
• Highway 33 and Yolo Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Mariposa Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Fresno Street intersection
o Policy B.3 - Delineate and install a striped buffered bike lane from Yolo Street to south of Inyo Avenue.
• Goal C: Consider new signals at key intersections as needed to maintain adequate traffic operations and provide protection for pedestrians.
o Policy C. l - Install a new traffic or HA WK signal at the following intersections:
• Highway 33 and Stuhr Road intersection
• Highway 33 and Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway intersection (or full traffic signal) • Highway 33 and Inyo A venue intersection
• Highway 33 at mid-block location south of Inyo A venue o Policy C.2 - Improve the following intersections with enhanced intersection improvements, such as new realigned crosswalks with highly visible crosswalk treatments:
• Highway 33 and Jensen Road I Sherman Parkway intersection • Highway 33 at Yolo Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Mariposa Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Fresno Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Inyo A venue intersection
• Highway 33 at mid-block location south of Inyo Avenue •
o Policy C.3 - Install improved crosswalks with accent paving at intersection on either end of the Downtown District.
• Highway 33 and Kern Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Merced Street intersection
• Goal D: Provide amenity improvements along the Highway Corridor, where appropriate. o Policy D. l - Provide for adequate streetscape, landscape, lighting ~nd street tree improvements along the Highway Corridor.
Streetscape Improvements and Gateway Signage:
Streetscape improvements, such as street trees, planters, street furniture, lighting, paving, painted utility boxes, and coordinated signage will support unifying and improving not only the Highway Corridor, but also the City of Newman. Improvements will increase as one enters the City and the Downtown District. This will help indicate to drivers they are entering the City of Newman and to slow speeds. As one enters town, the street trees will be more organically spaces and gradually become evenly spaced within the Downtown Core (between Yolo Street and Inyo Agenda Item: 9.a.
Avenue). Enhanced gateway signage and directional signage are proposed along the Highway Corridor to further identify the Highway Corridor to visitors and residents.
Implementation and Phasing:
The priority of phased improvements for the Highway Corridor is consistent with community feedback received during the HSP update process. Improvements related to overall safety and the specific safety of pedestrians and bicyclists along the Highway Corridor shall be the first priority. These safety improvements would include separated multi-use paths, buffered bike lanes, intersection improvements, and improvements to slow vehicular traffic. Though important, beautification improvements are a lower priority for the Highway Corridor; however, should be implemented when funding is available. Refer to HSP Section 2 for Circulation Overview figures and Corridor Segment Recommendations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City applied for and was awarded a Sustainable Communities Transportation Grant from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The grant amount awarded by Caltrans was $221,325 with a local match of $28,675 for a total project cost of $250,000.
CONCLUSION:
At the time this staff report was being prepared, the City has not received any comments on the contents of the 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing and proceed with the adoption the 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2022-: A Resolution of the City of Newman City Council Adopting the 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan
2. Highway 33 Specific Plan Update with Appendix A
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWMAN ADOPTING THE CITY OF NEWMAN 2022 HIGHWAY 33 SPECFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, The City of Newman 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP) is a policy-planning tool intended to guide the orderly development of land and improvements along the State Highway 33 Corridor.
The purpose of the HSP is to implement Policy LU-3.7, Policy CD-7.5, and Action CD-7.2 of the City of Newman 2030 General Plan, consistent with Government Code 65450. The HSP provides a 'bridge' between the General Plan's broad-based goals and the City of Newman's Zoning Code's detailed regulations; and
WHEREAS, The HSP regulates both the distribution and character of uses along the Highway Corridor and addresses four primary topics along the Highway Corridor, including land use, mobility, infrastructure, and urban design. Used as a tool to guide both new development and redevelopment, the HSP implements the General Plan's goal for the Highway Corridor of creating a more appealing and attractive commercial corridor centered around the City's Downtown District, as depicted in the Highway 33 Specific Plan.
Additionally, the HSP focuses on pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular transportation improvements, which address transit needs, safety issues, implementation of the City's 'complete streets' goal, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; and
WHEREAS, California State Highway 33 provides the primary access to the City of Newman. The HSP area encompasses a corridor along State Highway 33 bound by Stuhr Road in the north, Union Pacific Railroad to the east, the Stanislaus County/Merced County Line to the south, and various parcel lines running approximately 300 feet to 1:4 mile west of Highway 33; and WHEREAS, in 2020 the Cify of Newman retained RRM Design Group to work with the Community Development Department to develop the 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, The City of Newman 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan, like all of the City's "topicspecific" planning documents, is considered a step-down plan from the General Plan and was developed in consideration of the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65450; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Newman held a public hearing on January 25, 2022 to review the City of Newman 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, City Staff reviewed the project and found the project to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newman adopts the .
City ofNewman 2022 Highway 33 Specific Plan.
The forgoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newman held on the 25th day of January 2022 by Council Member , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded and it was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: APPROVED:
ATTEST: Casey Graham
Mayor of the City of Newman
Mike Maier
City Clerk of the City of Newman
Highway 33 Specific Plan Update
City of Newman | January 2022
This page intentionally left blank
ii
ADOPTED BY:
AMENDED BY:
PREPARED FOR:
FUNDED BY:
PREPARED BY:
City of Newman
Highway 33 Specific Plan Update
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant
City of Newman
City of Newman
938 Fresno Street
Newman, CA 95360
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
This page intentionally left blank
iv
Acknowledgments
CITY COUNCIL
CITY STAFF
Casey Graham Mayor
John Pimentel Council Member
Laroy McDonald Council Member
Nicholas Candea Council Member
Scott Ball Council Member
Justin Hendrix
Kathryn Reyes
Michael Holland
Mike Maier
City Planner
Public Works Director
City Manager
City Clerk
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
This page intentionally left blank
vi
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 A. Plan Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
1. Purpose and Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1
2. Site Location and Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
3. Project Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-2 B. Specific Plan Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
1. Specific Plan Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-5
2. Specific Plan Regulation and Adoption . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
3. Project Consistency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
4. Severability Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-5 C. Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6 D. Specific Plan Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-7 E. Community Outreach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-10 II. COMPREHENSIVE GOALS AND POLICIES . . . . 2-1
A. Land Use Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
1. Land Use Plan and Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-1
2. Land Use Goals and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-4
3. Specific Plan Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-6
4. Permitted Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-8
5. Development Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8 B. Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9
1. Circulation System Existing Conditions Overview . . . . . .2-9
2. Street Classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10
3. Key Issues and Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-13
4. Mobility Goals and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-14
5. Best Practices Toolbox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-15
6. Corridor Segment Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . 2-18
7. Streetscape Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-35
8. Gateway Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-35 C. Infrastructure and Public Facilities Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-36
1. Specific Plan Infrastructure Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . 2-36
2. Infrastructure Goals, Objectives, and Policies . . . . . . . 2-36 Table of Contents
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
III. URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
A. Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 B. General Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 C. Downtown District: Architectural Character . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 D. Downtown District: Building Siting and Parking . . . . . . . . . . 3-7 E. Downtown District: Pedestrian Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 F. Highway District: Architectural Character . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9 G. Highway District: Building Walls and Massing . . . . . . . . . . 3-10 H. Highway District: Roof Form and Materials . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11 I. Highway District: Windows and Doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-12 J. Highway District: Site Design and Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13 IV. IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING . . . . . . . . 4-1
A. Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
1. Annexation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 B. Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
1. City Wide Services Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
2. Financing Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-2
3. Implementation Goals and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-3
4. Implementation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-3
5. Improvement Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4 C. Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
1. Existing Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-5
2. Site Plans, Street Improvement Plans and Subdivision Maps4-5
3. Landscape Plan Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
4. Annexation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
5. Environmental Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
6. Substantial Conformance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6 D. Amendment Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
1. Amendment Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-6
2. Submittal of Supplemental Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
3. Supplemental Environmental Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
4. City Staff Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
5. Public Hearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-7 Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan . . . A-1 Appendix B: Community Outreach Summaries . . . . . . . . . B-1 Appendix C: Cost Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 Table of Contents
vii City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
viii
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 1: Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 Figure 2: Specific Plan Boundary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4 Figure 3: Opportunities and Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-8 Figure 4: Opportunities and Constraints Downtown Enlargement . . . . . . . . . 1-9 Figure 5: Community Questionnaire Interactive Mapping Tool . . . . . . . . . . 1-11 Figure 6: Land Use Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 Figure 7: Zoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-7 Figure 8.a: Circulation Overview Map (E. Stuhr Rd. to Mariposa St.) . . . . . . . 2-11 Figure 8.b: Circulation Overview Map (Kern St. to Shields Rd.) . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 Figure 9: Section Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-17 Figure 10: Stuhr Road to Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway Street Section A . . . . . . . 2-19 Figure 11: Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . . 2-20 Figure 12: South of Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway to Yolo Section B . . . . . . . 2-21 Figure 13: Yolo Street Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-22 Figure 14: North of Yolo Street Section C (Multi-use path west of railroad tracks) 2-24 Figure 15: Mariposa Street to Kern Street Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . . . 2-25 Figure 16: Tulare Street to Fresno Street Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . 2-27 Figure 17: Merced Street to Stanislaus Street Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . 2-28 Figure 18: North of Fresno Street Section D1 and North of Stanislaus Street Section D2 2-29 Figure 19: Inyo Avenue Lane Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-32 Figure 20: Mid-Block Crossing, South of Inyo Avenue Lane Configuration . . . . . 2-33 Figure 21: South of Inyo Avenue Street Section E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-34 Figure 22: Infrastructure Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-42 Figure 23: Urban Design Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 2-1: Land Use Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 Table 2-2: Zoning Compatibility Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Table 2-3: Street Classifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10 Table 2-4: Required Water System Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-37 Table 2-5: Required Sewer System Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-38 Table 2-6: Required Storm Drain System Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-39 Table of Contents
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
This page intentionally left blank
1 INTRODUCTION
1-1
1 I. INTRODUCTION
Section One of the Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP) provides a project background summary and describes the HSP’s relationship to specific plan legislation. Section One includes a description of the Specific Plan area and location, site constraints, and project goals. Also described is the HSP’s relationship to the City of Newman’s General Plan (General Plan) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A. Plan Summary
1. Purpose and Intent
The Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP) is a policy planning tool intended to guide the orderly development of land along the State Highway 33 Corridor (Highway Corridor). The purpose of the HSP is to implement Policy LU-3.7, Policy CD-5.1, Policy CD-7.5, and Action CD-7.2 of the General Plan, consistent with Government Code 65450. The HSP provides a “bridge” between the General Plan’s broad-based goals and the Zoning Ordinance’s detailed regulations.
The HSP regulates both the distribution and character of uses along the Highway Corridor and addresses four primary issues along the Highway Corridor: land use, mobility, infrastructure, and urban design. Used as a tool to control both new development and redevelopment, the HSP implements the General Plan’s goal for the Highway Corridor of creating a more appealing and attractive commercial corridor centered around the City’s Downtown District, as depicted in Section III. Additionally, the HSP focuses on pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular transportation improvements, which address transit needs, safety issues, implementation of the City’s ‘complete streets’ goal, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
2. Site Location and Context
The HSP area is located in Stanislaus County approximately 21-23 miles southwest of Modesto.
California State Highway 33 provides the primary access to the City of Newman (Refer to Figure 1: Location Map). The Specific Plan area encompasses a corridor along State Highway 33 bound by Stuhr Road to the north, Union Pacific Railroad to the east, the Stanislaus County/Merced County Line to the south, and various parcel lines running approximately 300 feet to ¼ mile west of Highway 33 (Refer to Figure 2: Specific Plan Boundary).
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-2
1 3. Project Overview
The HSP provides goals and policies to shape the urban character development and stimulate the economic growth potential of the Highway Corridor. The HSP provides for a compatible mix of land uses. Zoning designations within the HSP area will be adopted or amended as land is either annexed or improved. Responding to the nature of the Highway Corridor, the HSP’s land uses are limited to commercial, office, business park, public/quasi-public, and park uses; however, vertical or horizontal mixed-use areas will also be allowed. Circulation and infrastructure improvements will be focused primarily along Highway 33, consistent with the General Plan and influenced by community feedback received from public outreach efforts on the engineered concept alternatives.
The HSP establishes two Urban Design Districts that delineate the unique character of the Downtown District and the outlying Highway District. Urban Design Guidelines provide character prototypes for each Urban Design District. Section II contains guidelines for each respective District, which address building siting, orientation, massing, architectural character, parking, streetscape, and signage. To improve access and visibility to Downtown and Main Street, a wayfinding system and/or directional signage are proposed along the Highway Corridor.
An example of paved shoulder utilized by a bicyclist within a rural setting City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-3
1 Figure 1. Location Map
Patterson
Newman
Tracy
Stockton
Modesto
Merced
Chowchilla
Los Banos
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5 5
99 99
33 * 132
33 Stanislaus County
Merced County
Figure 1. Location Map
County Line
Legend N
0 5 10 MI
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-4
1 Figure 2. Plan Area Diagram
Specific Plan Boundary
Legend
N
0 500 1000 FT
City Limits
Sherman Pkwy.
E. Stuhr Rd.
Yolo St.
Jensen Rd.
Kern St.
Hwy 33
Hwy 33
Mariposa St.
Merced St.
Inyo Ave.
Fresno St.
Stanislaus County
Merced County
N St.
Shields Rd. lds Rd.
Figure 2. Specific Plan Boundary
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-5
1 1. Specific Plan Authority
The California Government Code Sections
65460 65457 and the State General Plan
Guidelines prepared by the State Office of
Planning and Research (OPR) state that a
specific plan may be used to implement a
general plan and its policies and programs.
Specific plans must be consistent with the
applicable elements of the General Plan.
The following excerpt identifies the content
requirements for specific plans defined in
State Law (Section 65451 (a)).
65451 (a) A specific plan shall include a text
and a diagram or diagrams which specify all
of the following in detail:
1. The distribution, location, and extent of
the uses of land, including open space,
within the area covered by the plan.
2. The proposed distribution, location, and
extent and intensity of major components of
public and private transportation, sewage,
water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy,
and other essential facilities proposed to
be located within the area covered by the
plan and needed to support the land uses
described in the plan.
3. Standards and criteria by which
development will proceed, and standards
for the conservation, development, and
utilization of natural resources, where
applicable.
4. A program of implementation measures
including regulations, programs, public works
projects, and financing measures necessary
to carry out paragraphs 1), 2), and 3).
65451 (b) The specific plan shall include a
statement of the relationship of the specific
plan to the general plan.
The HSP has been prepared pursuant to State
Law and complies with all requirements.
2. Specific Plan Regulation
and Adoption
The HSP is a policy document that sets forth the
guiding principles by which development shall
occur within the HSP area. Site requirements
and standards for the development of land
are deferred to the City of Newman’s Zoning
Ordinance. The Highway 33 Specific Plan
shall be adopted by City Council Resolution.
The Urban Design Guidelines in Section III
are intended to provide tools to evaluate
projects beyond the regulatory requirements
contained in the HSP. The intent of these
guidelines is to promote quality design
and construction, protect the existing site
character and environment, as well as ensure
proposed improvements are compatible with
the characteristics of the community.
3. Project Consistency
All projects approved within the HSP area,
including rezoning, tentative subdivision maps,
vesting tentative subdivision maps, public works
projects, conditional use permits and building
permits shall be consistent with the HSP.
4. Severability Clause
In the event that any regulation, condition,
program, or portion of this HSP is held
invalid or unconstitutional by a California or
Federal Court of competent jurisdiction, such
portions shall be deemed separate, distinct,
and independent provisions, and the invalidity
of such provisions shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions thereof.
B. Specific Plan Requirements
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-6
1 C. Existing Conditions
The HSP area contains a variety of existing land use conditions ranging from agricultural operations to modern supermarkets. Included within this range of existing uses are large food processing industries, historic downtown buildings, deteriorating residential units, and a variety of small light industrial and highway commercial uses. Much of the property within the Highway Corridor is underutilized and lacks site improvements, landscaping, parking, and modern infrastructure.
Highway 33 is a two-lane State Route with graded shoulders on the north and south ends of town. Within city limits, the Highway Corridor widens to accommodate turning movements and on-street parking. Sidewalks, street lighting, and curb improvements are present along some stretches of the Highway Corridor. No unifying landscape or streetscape patterns exist along the full stretch of Highway 33.
Certain parcels at the northern end of the HSP area are within Stanislaus County jurisdiction; however, these parcels are included in the City’s 2017 Northwest Newman Master Plan and are included in the HSP area. The City’s General Plan identifies the Northwest Newman Master Plan as Master Planning Area 3 and designates the land for residential and business uses. The entirety of the Northwest Newman Master Plan Area is encompassed within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence. The Primary Sphere of Influence is land that is expected to be annexed into the City within the next ten or so years.
State Highway 33 Corridor at E. Stuhr Road
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-7
1 Specific Plan Area Issues and Priorities
Following is a summary of existing conditions and HSP area issues that arose from the Community Questionnaire and Community Workshops and which will be addressed in the HSP.
Refer to Figures 3 and 4 for Opportunity and Constraint maps of the Highway Corridor.
1. Improve safety along the Highway 33 Corridor for all modes of travel.
2. Install / provide amenity improvements along the corridor, where appropriate.
3. Increase Downtown’s identity and beautify Downtown with seating, lighting, signage, landscaping, etc.
4. Retain a small-town, rural/agricultural character of the Highway Corridor.
5. Improve outlying areas along the Highway Corridor.
6. Lack of consistent beautification, landscaping, and streetscaping improvements.
7. Lack of bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the Highway Corridor.
8. Address dangerous pedestrian crossings along Highway 33, particularly the Sherman Parkway/Highway 33 intersection.
9. Design improvements with consideration to the Union Pacific Railroad P.O.W. crossings / adjacency to the Highway Corridor.
D. Specific Plan Guiding Principles
The purpose of the HSP is to improve the safety, appearance, economic potential, and infrastructure deficiencies of the Highway Corridor. Consistent with the General Plan, the HSP promotes alternative modes of transportation, addresses safety concerns, provides unification and beautification elements and amenities, reduces emissions, and sets a vision for future changes along the Highway Corridor. The following HSP Guiding Principles define the kind of community the City’s residents desire, describe shared values and a vision for the City, and ensure consistency with the General Plan.
HSP Guiding Principles
1. Establish a unifying theme and vision for the Highway Corridor.
2. Strengthen and enhance Downtown as the Central Business District.
3. Improve the streetscape, safety, and circulation on Highway 33.
4. Encourage bicycle and pedestrian circulation.
5. Provide urban design guidelines for the HSP area.
6. Provide adequate infrastructure and utilities for the HSP area.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-8
1 Figure 3. Opportunities and Constraints
INYO AVE STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
MERCED ST
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
RED LION WY
BARRINGTON AVE
L ST
E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
VON RENNER
ELEMENTARY
HURD BARRINGTON ELEM
HUNT
ELEM
ORESTIMBA HIGH
SCHOOL
YOLO
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
YOLO ST
E
L ST
SHERMAN PKWY
BALSAM DR
DRISKELL AVE
T ST
S ST
FEB 04, 2020
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 350 FT
LEGEND
PROJECT AREA
Parks
Schools
Public Services
Downtown Core
Class II Bike Lanes
Multi-Use Pathway
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
City Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Existing Railroad Crossing
Railroad Crossing Opportunity
Intersection Improvement Opportunity
Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity
Bike Facility Opportunity
OCT 1, 2021
ESNO ST
LARE ST LARE ST
KE
T
MAIN ST M
M ST
N ST / HWY N ST / HWY N ST / HWY
E S
SLAU
ERCED S
US ST
KERN ST
OSA ST POSA ST
ST OLO
ERN ST
P ST
T
ST
SHE
ST 33 Y
ST
N P
HAGERMAN
L ST
SLAUS ST
LEE AVE LEE
AV
PEAK DR P
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
EnlargementSee Downtown
POTENTIAL OPPOTUNITY SITES
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
Future Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Longterm Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Vacant Parcel Next to Fire Station
Arco Gas Station Redevelopment
Dimare Fresh Foods
Underutilized Truck Scale Site
Underutilized Vacant Parcel
Vacant Parcel
Previous Creamery Building
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
CITY OF
NEWMAN
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY SITES
1 Longterm Opportunity
(3 Parcels) Requires
City Annexation
2 Vacant Parcel Next to
Fire Station
3 Arco Gas Station
Redevelopment
4 Dimare Fresh Foods
5 Underutilized Truck
Scale Site
6 Underutilized Vacant
Parcel
7 Vacant Parcel Previous
Creamery Building
8 Vacant Undeveloped
Parcel
9 Vacant Undeveloped
Parcel
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
INYO AVE STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
MERCED ST
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
RED LION WY
BARRINGTON AVE
L ST
E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
VON RENNER
ELEMENTARY
HURD BARRINGTON ELEM
HUNT
ELEM
ORESTIMBA HIGH
SCHOOL
YOLO
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
YOLO ST
E
L ST
SHERMAN PKWY
BALSAM DR
DRISKELL AVE
T ST
S ST
FEB 04, 2020
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 350 FT
LEGEND
PROJECT AREA
Parks
Schools
Public Services
Downtown Core
Class II Bike Lanes
Multi-Use Pathway
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
City Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Existing Railroad Crossing
Railroad Crossing Opportunity
Intersection Improvement Opportunity
Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity
Bike Facility Opportunity
OCT 1, 2021
ESNO ST
LARE ST LARE ST
KE
T
MAIN ST M
M ST
N ST / HWY N ST / HWY N ST / HWY
E S
SLAU
ERCED S
US ST
KERN ST
OSA ST POSA ST
ST OLO
ERN ST
P ST
T
ST
SHE
ST 33 Y
ST
N P
HAGERMAN
L ST
SLAUS ST
LEE AVE LEE
AV
PEAK DR P
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
EnlargementSee Downtown
POTENTIAL OPPOTUNITY SITES
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
Future Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Longterm Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Vacant Parcel Next to Fire Station
Arco Gas Station Redevelopment
Dimare Fresh Foods
Underutilized Truck Scale Site
Underutilized Vacant Parcel
Vacant Parcel
Previous Creamery Building
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
CITY OF
NEWMAN
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 NTS
STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
MERCED ST
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
RED LION WY
BARRINGTON AVE
L ST
E STUHR RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
VON RENNER
ELEMENTARY
HURD BARRINGTON ELEM
YOLO ST
L ST
SHERMAN PKWY
BALSAM DR
DRISKELL AVE
T
FEB 04, 2020
TIES &
TS
E STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 350 FT
LEGEND
Parks
Schools
Public Services
Downtown Core
Class II Bike Lanes
Multi-Use Pathway
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
City Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Existing Railroad Crossing
Railroad Crossing Opportunity
Intersection Improvement Opportunity
Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity
Bike Facility Opportunity
OCT 1, 2021
ESNO ST
LARE ST LARE ST
KE
T
MAIN ST M
M ST
N ST / HWY N ST / HWY N ST / HWY
E S
SLAU
ERCED S
US ST
KERN ST
OSA ST POSA ST
ST OLO
ERN ST
P ST
T
ST
SHE
ST 33 Y
ST
N P
HAGERMAN
L ST
SLAUS ST
LEE AVE LEE
AV
PEAK DR P
EnlargementSee Downtown
POTENTIAL OPPOTUNITY SITES
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
Future Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Longterm Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Vacant Parcel Next to Fire Station
Arco Gas Station Redevelopment
Dimare Fresh Foods
Underutilized Truck Scale Site
Underutilized Vacant Parcel
Vacant Parcel
Previous Creamery Building
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
Vacant Undeveloped Parcel
CITY OF
NEWMAN
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-9
1 Figure 4. Opportunities and Constraints Downtown Enlargement
INYO AVE
STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
M ST
YOLO ST
L ST
N ST/ HWY 33
DRISKELL AVE
BALSAM DR
MAIN ST
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 100 FT
FEB 04, 2020
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
LEGEND
DOWNTOWN ENLARGEMENT
Parks
Class II Bike Lanes
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
Downtown Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Signalized Intersection
Enhancement Opportunity
Downtown Core
Crosswalk Improvement Need
Bike Facility Opportunity
FEB 10, 2021
Downtown Gateway
ry Veh
ntown Gatewa
Existing Park
Opportunity Site
Existing Farmer’s Market
Opportunity Site
Existing
Right of Way
Opportunity
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
INYO AVE STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
MERCED ST
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
RED LION WY
BARRINGTON AVE
L ST
E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
VON RENNER
ELEMENTARY
HURD BARRINGTON ELEM
HUNT
ELEM
ORESTIMBA HIGH
SCHOOL
YOLO
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
YOLO ST
E
L ST
SHERMAN PKWY
BALSAM DR
DRISKELL AVE
T ST
S ST
FEB
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
LEGEND
PROJECT AREA
Parks
Schools
Public Services
Downtown Core
Class II Bike Lanes
Multi-Use Pathway
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
City Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Existing Railroad Crossing
Railroad Crossing Opportunity
Intersection Improvement Opportunity
Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity
Bike Facility Opportunity
OC
ESNO ST
LARE ST LARE ST
KE
T
MAIN ST M
M ST
N ST / HWY N ST / HWY N ST / HWY
E S
SLAU
ERCED S
US ST
KERN ST
OSA ST POSA ST
ST OLO
ERN ST
P ST
T
ST
SHE
ST 33 Y
ST
N P
HAGERMAN
L ST
SLAUS ST
LEE AVE LEE
AV
PEAK DR P
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
EnlargementSee Downtown
POTENTIAL OPPOTUNITY SITES
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
City Limits
Future Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Longterm Opportunity (3 Parcels)
Requires City Annexation
Vacant Parcel Next to Fire Station
Arco Gas Station Redevelopment
Dimare Fresh Foods
Underutilized Truc
Underutilized Vaca
Vacant Parcel
Previous Creamery
Vacant Undevelop
Vacant Undevelop
CITY OF
NEWMAN
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 INYO AVE
STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
M ST
YOLO ST
L ST
N ST/ HWY 33
DRISKELL AVE
BALSAM DR
MAIN ST
TY OF NEWMAN, CA
HWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 100 FT
FEB 04, 2020
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
LEGEND
DOWNTOWN ENLARGEMENT
Parks
Class II Bike Lanes
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
Downtown Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Signalized Intersection
Enhancement Opportunity
Downtown Core
Crosswalk Improvement Need
Bike Facility Opportunity
FEB 10, 2021
Downtown Gateway
ry Veh
ntown Gatewa
Existing Park
Opportunity Site
Existing Farmer’s Market
Opportunity Site
Existing
Right of Way
Opportunity
HWAY 33
CIFIC PLAN
NDARY
INYO AVE
STANISLAUS ST
MERCED ST
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
M ST
YOLO ST
L ST
N ST/ HWY 33
DRISKELL AVE
BALSAM DR
MAIN ST
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE STANISLAUS CO, CA
0 100 FT
FEB 04, 2020
OPPORTUNITIES &
CONSTRAINTS
LEGEND
DOWNTOWN ENLARGEMENT
Parks
Class II Bike Lanes
Railroad Tracks
Opportunity Sites
Downtown Gateway
Primary Vehicular Circulation
Signalized Intersection
Enhancement Opportunity
Downtown Core
Crosswalk Improvement Need
Bike Facility Opportunity
FEB 10, 2021
Downtown Gateway
ry Veh
ntown Gatewa
Existing Park
Opportunity Site
Existing Farmer’s Market
Opportunity Site
Existing
Right of Way
Opportunity
HIGHWAY 33
SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY
NTS
Specific Plan Boundary
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-10
1 E. Community Outreach
Initial community outreach efforts for the
HSP consisted of an online community
questionnaire for residents and business
owners to provide feedback on the community
preferences, needs, issues, and opportunities
along the Highway Corridor. The online
community questionnaire, facilitated through
the engagement platform Social Pinpoint,
was open for comments from January 25,
2021, to February 22, 2021. Hard copies were
made available on request.
The online questionnaire included two
components. First, an interactive mapping
segment allowed respondents to select from
several icons which represented ‘Pedestrian
Improvements’, ‘Bicycle Improvements’,
‘Transit Improvements’, ‘Safety Concerns’,
or general ‘Make a Comment’. Participants
then located the selected icon(s) on the
map denoting specific needs/concerns/
preferences along the Highway Corridor and
included descriptions further characterizing
the idea or desired improvement. Second,
respondents were asked to complete a general
question and answer prompt which contained
18 questions, including demographic data
and context of respondents.
The Questionnaire’s Social Pinpoint platform
allowed for participants to up-vote and/or
down-vote other participant’s comments.
The following themes emerged regarding
the major issues, ideas, and needs for the
Highway Corridor:
• Improve safety along the Highway Corridor
for all modes of travel.
◦ Separation from vehicular uses along the
Highway Corridor for bicyclists is desired
◦ Improve pedestrian crosswalks and/
or provide flashing pedestrian crossing
signals at the following key locations or
intersections:
- Crosswalk at Fresno / Highway 33;
- Crosswalk at Inyo / Highway 33;
- Crosswalk at Sherman Parkway /
Highway 33;
- Crosswalk at Mariposa / Highway 33;
and
- Crosswalk across from Burger King.
◦ Consider new signals at key intersections
to aid in crossing the Highway Corridor
and/or adding additional vehicular turning
lanes, when appropriate, to maintain
through-traffic movements. Signals at the
following intersections were highlighted:
- Signal at Jensen Road/Highway 33;
- Signal at Stuhr / Highway 33; and
- Signal at Inyo/Highway 33.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-11
1 Figure 5. Community Questionnaire Interactive Mapping Tool Install and/or provide amenity improvements along
the Highway Corridor, where appropriate, including
but not limited to the following:
◦ Benches near Downtown;
◦ Street lighting;
◦ Complete sidewalk network along Highway
Corridor;
◦ Wide sidewalks for pedestrian use and
prioritization;
◦ Landscaping;
◦ Bicycle lanes/facilities; and
◦ ADA access.
Refer to Figure 5: Community Questionnaire
Interactive Mapping Tool.
On Wednesday, April 21, 2021, the City of Newman
conducted the City’s first public virtual workshop for
the HSP. The workshop consisted of a presentation
overviewing the project, presenting feedback from
the online Community Questionnaire, and seeking
community feedback on the proposed alternatives
for the Highway Corridor. There were also Q & A
/ discussion segments intermixed throughout the
workshop and presentation conclusion in which
community members shared comments, ideas,
and/or questions. Additional input was received
via a supplementary Sli.do poll distributed after
the workshop to encourage community members
who were unable to attend the live workshop event
to participate in the preference polling for the
segments along the Highway Corridor. Refer to
Section 2 for the Circulation Plan and a detailed
overview of the recommendations for each of the
segments along the Highway Corridor.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
1-12
1 Emerging themes from the workshop and
follow-up Sli.do poll included the following:
• Install a separated multi-use path on the
east side of Highway 33 from E. Stuhr Road
to Sherman Parkway.
• Provide a separated multi-use path on the
east side of Highway 33 from Jensen Road/
Sherman Parkway to Yolo Street between
the railroad and Highway Corridor.
• Keep parallel parking next to curb on west
side of Highway 33, with bike lane and buffer
between parking and travel lane between
Yolo Street and Inyo Street
• Consider providing a separated multi-use
path from Inyo Street to southern City Limit
line.
• Consider new gateway signs in key locations
along the Highway Corridor.
• Provide directional signs in key locations
along the Highway Corridor.
• Install new paving and crosswalk
enhancements in key intersections along the
Highway Corridor.
• Incorporate identity enhancements and
beautification treatments, along the Highway
Corridor, such as painted utility boxes, string
lights, bicycle racks, and planters.
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, a second
public virtual workshop was conducted
for the Specific Plan Update project. The
workshop consisted of a presentation
from the consultant team, overviewing the
project, presenting feedback from the online
Community Questionnaire, and providing an
overview of the preferred corridor concepts
for the Highway 33 corridor. There were also
Q & A / discussion segments intermixed
throughout the workshop and concluding the
presentation, in which community members
could share comments, ideas, and/or
questions verbally or through the Zoom chat
feature. The workshop was recorded and put
on the City website to offer the community
flexibility to view the presentation at their
own time. The proposed corridor concepts
and enhancements have been incorporated
into the HSP.
Refer to Appendix B: Community Outreach
Summaries for detailed summaries on the
Community Questionnaire, and Community
Workshops 1 and 2.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
This page intentionally left blank
COMPREHENSIVE GOALS
AND POLICIES
2 2
2-1
II. COMPREHENSIVE GOALS AND POLICIES
Section Two of the Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP) provides goals and policies to guide development within the HSP area. This Section identifies the extent, development intensity, and improvements for the State Highway 33 Corridor (Highway Corridor). Land Use, Circulation, Infrastructure, and Public Facilities are addressed in this Section.
A. Land Use Plan
The HSP Figure 6: Land Use Plan is based on the adopted General Plan Land Use Designations and the Northwest Newman Master Plan Land Use Map. There are no amendments to the General Plan Land Use Designations Figure proposed as part of the HSP. The HSP utilizes the General Plan’s adopted land use designations, which are described further in this Section. The HSP Figure 6: Land Use Plan provides a mix of land uses consistent with the adopted goals of the HSP and intent of the General Plan.
1. Land Use Plan and Summary
The Specific Plan Table 2-1: Land Use Summary outlines the extent and intensity of land uses indicated in Figure 6: Land Use Plan. The intensity of land uses is dictated by the development standards provided in the Newman City Code (Title 5: Zoning). Residential land uses are permitted in the Downtown Commercial designated areas and are regulated by density or the number of dwelling units per gross acre.
Business Park
The Business Park land use designation allows for offices, research and development, light industrial, wholesale commercial and limited regional commercial uses, public and quasi-public uses. The Northwest Newman Master Plan designates the nine parcels fronting onto Highway 33 at the northernmost segment of the Highway Corridor as Business Park. These parcels are currently located in Stanislaus County jurisdiction. Refer to Table 2-1: Land Use Summary for acreage and developable square footage.
Business Park building example
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-2
Community Commercial
The Community Commercial designation provides for land-extensive retail and wholesale commercial uses, professional offices, public and quasi-public uses. Refer to Table 2-1: Land Use Summary for acreage and developable square footage.
Downtown Commercial
The Downtown Commercial land use designation allows for retail and service uses, restaurants, professional and administrative offices, hotels, residential units above the ground floor, live-work units, public and quasi-public uses. This designation is intended to accommodate local-serving retail and offices; large administrative offices and land-extensive commercial operations are not appropriate in this designation. Residential uses shall be subject to discretionary review and approval. Refer to Table 2-1: Land Use Summary for acreage, density, and developable square footage.
Downtown Commercial allows for several types of uses including retail, commercial, and mixed-use Community Commercial accommodates a variety of commercial uses City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-3
Public/Quasi-Public
The Public/Quasi-Public designation allows for government-owned facilities, public private schools, day care, and quasi-public uses, such as hospitals and churches. Refer to Table 2-1:
Land Use Summary for acreage and developable square footage.
Recreation and Park allows for public parks and other recreational uses Public/Quasi-Public allows for government-owned and quasi-public uses Recreation and Park
The Recreation and Park land use designation provides for existing and planned public parks and other recreational uses. Copeland Park, at the southeastern corner of Yolo Street and N Street/Highway 33, is the only property in the HSP area designated Recreation and Park. Refer to Table 2-1: Land Use Summary for acreage, maximum allowed FAR, and developable square footage.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-4
Land Use Acreage % of HSP area
Business Park 25.7 ac 14.9%
Community Commercial 69.3 ac 40.3%
Downtown Commercial 20.3 ac 11.8%
Public/Quasi-Public 4.1 ac 2.4%
Recreation and Parks (less than .1 acres) 0.0 ac 0.0%
City / Road / Railroad Right-of-Way 52.7 ac 30.6%
Refer to the Newman City Code, Title 5 Zoning for development standards which apply to the land uses specified in this table.
Table 2.1: Land Use Summary
2. Land Use Goals and Policies
The following land use goals and policies are applicable to the Highway Corridor, and projects within the HSP area shall be consistent with these goals and policies.
Goal A: Provide for commercial development along the Highway Corridor that complements Downtown and is consistent with Newman’s small-town character.
Policy A.1: Preserve Newman’s small-town qualities and the character of Downtown by enforcing development standards and encouraging compliance with design guidelines (refer to Section III) along the Highway Corridor.
Policy A.2: Establish pedestrian-scaled and pedestrian-oriented development and amenities along Highway 33 within the Downtown District.
Policy A.3 Allow for the continuation of existing industrial land uses and facilities located along the Highway Corridor. Consider relocating existing industrial land uses outside of the Downtown District, but still within city limits. New industrial land uses and facilities will not be allowed in the Downtown District.
Policy A.4: Transition non-conforming uses to more appropriate sites within the City boundaries, where appropriate.
Policy A.5: Encourage primary land uses along the Highway Corridor which offer additional commercial or retail, and/or employment opportunities for residents or visitors.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-5
Figure 6. Land Use Plan
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
05 Medium Density Residential
Community Commercial
Downtown Commercial
Business Park
Public/Quasi-Public
Recreation and Parks
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
LAND USE MAP
DRAFT-2
MAP FEATURES
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
WMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
C PLAN UPDATE
05 Community Commercial
Downtown Commercial
Business Park
Public/Quasi-Public
Recreation and Parks
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
ND USE MAP
DRAFT-2
MAP FEATURES
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
05 Community Commercial
Downtown Commercial
Business Park
Public/Quasi-Public
Recreation and Parks
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
LAND USE MAP
DRAFT-2
MAP FEATURES
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
05 Community Commercial
Downtown Commercial
Business Park
Public/Quasi-Public
Recreation and Parks
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
LAND USE MAP
DRAFT-2
MAP FEATURES
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-6
3. Specific Plan Zoning
The HSP Figure 7: Zoning Map illustrates the land within the Local Agency Formation Commission’s (LAFCO) Primary Sphere of Influence as well as the City of Newman Zoning designations. Lands currently zoned within city limits will not be rezoned as part of the HSP adoption process; therefore, no zoning amendments are necessary. Future re-zoning, use permits, and subdivisions within the Highway Corridor shall be made consistent with the policies, specifications, and Urban Design Guidelines of the HSP.
Table 2-2: Zoning Compatibility Matrix provides a matrix of permitted zoning designations that is consistent with the Land Use Plan.
Table 2-2: Zoning Compatibility Matrix
Specific Plan
Land Use
Permitted Zoning Designations (per
Title 5 Zoning)
Business Park Light Industrial/Business Park (M)
Community Commercial
General Service Commercial District,
Highway Commercial District (C-2,
C-8)
Downtown Commercial
Highway Commercial District, Planned
Development District, Professional
Office District (C-2, P-D, P-O)
Public/Quasi-Public Public and Quasi-Public District (PQP) Recreation and Park Open Space District (OS)
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-7
Figure 7. Zoning Map
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
ZONING MAP 06
DRAFT-v2
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
ZONING DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
MAP FEATURES
Multiple Residential (R-3)
General Service Commercial (C-2)
Highway Commercial (C-8)
Light Industrial/Business Park (M)
Controlled Manufacturing (I)
Public/Quasi Public (PQP)
Open Space (OS)
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
WMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
IC PLAN UPDATE
ONING MAP 06
DRAFT-v2
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
ZONING DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
MAP FEATURES
Multiple Residential (R-3)
General Service Commercial (C-2)
Highway Commercial (C-8)
Light Industrial/Business Park (M)
Controlled Manufacturing (I)
Public/Quasi Public (PQP)
Open Space (OS)
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
ZONING MAP 06
DRAFT-v2
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
ZONING DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
MAP FEATURES
Multiple Residential (R-3)
General Service Commercial (C-2)
Highway Commercial (C-8)
Light Industrial/Business Park (M)
Controlled Manufacturing (I)
Public/Quasi Public (PQP)
Open Space (OS)
Stanislaus County
Merced County
JENSEN RD
E STUHR RD
L ST
BALSAM DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BANFF DR
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
SHERMAN PKWY
LEE AVE
FIG LN
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
L ST
M ST
MAIN ST
P ST
Q ST
R ST
S ST
T ST
CANYON CREEK DR
PATCHETT DR
DRISKELL AVE
MERCED ST
YOLO ST
MARIPOSA ST
KERN ST
TULARE ST
FRESNO ST
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
INYO AVE
FRESNO ST
TULARE ST
KERN ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
MERCED ST
DRISKELL AVE
PATCHETT DR
CANYON CREEK DR
T ST
S ST
R ST
Q ST
P ST
MAIN ST
M ST
L ST
N ST / HWY 33
EUCALYPTUS AVE
FIG LN
LEE AVE
SHERMAN PKWY
HAGERMAN PEAK DR
BANFF DR
BARRINGTON AVE
RED LION WY
BALSAM DR
L ST E STUHR RD
JENSEN RD
Merced County
Stanislaus County
PATCHETT DR Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
Von Renner
Elementary
Hurd Barrington Elementary
Hunt Elementary
Orestimba
High School
Yolo Middle School
JOB# 1992-01-CU20
NOV 3, 2021
175
CITY OF NEWMAN, CA NOTES:
1. Geo-referenced aerial imagery from the
NAIP - 2020.
2. Parcel and Right-of-Way data from Stanislaus
County GIS data.
3. Zoning and General Plan land use data from
City maps/documents.
4. For illustrative purposes only.
700 350 0 350 FT
HIGHWAY 33 SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
ZONING MAP 06
DRAFT-v2
City Boundary
Highway 33 Specific Plan Boundary
APN Parcel Boundary
Schools Within City Limits
ZONING DESIGNATION
STANISLAUS CO, CA
MAP FEATURES
Multiple Residential (R-3)
General Service Commercial (C-2)
Highway Commercial (C-8)
Light Industrial/Business Park (M)
Controlled Manufacturing (I)
Public/Quasi Public (PQP)
Open Space (OS)
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-8
4. Permitted Uses
The City’s Code (Title 5 Zoning) shall specify
permitted uses for the zoning designations
(refer to Table 2-2: Zoning Compatibility
Matrix) within the Highway Corridor; however,
the following permitted uses shall be allowed
within the General Service Commercial
and Highway Commercial zones along the
Highway Corridor in addition to what the City
Code allows.
a. Horizontal and Vertical Mixed-Use
1. Horizontal mixed-use consists of
a residential unit located behind a
commercial space fronting onto the
Highway Corridor.
2. Vertical mixed-use consists of a
residential unit(s) or office use located
above the ground floor of a commercial
use.
b. Live-Work units, as defined here:
1. A live-work unit is joint living and
working quarters which combines a
residential component (studio, loft, or
separate bedroom) and a commercial /
office component. The work component
does not have to be occupied by the
resident of the dwelling unit; however, the
commercial/office component should
front public sidewalk if possible.
5. Development Standards
Development standards for zoning
designations within the Highway Corridor are
not specified, as the City’s Code (Chapter 5)
shall prevail.
Vertical mixed-use with office use above
ground floor commercial use
Horizontal mixed-use with residential
behind commercial spaces
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-9
B. Mobility
1. Circulation System Existing
Conditions Overview
Figures 8.a and 8.b provide an overview of
the circulation network and identify location
and classification of vehicular and pedestrian
mobility circulation routes.
The Highway Corridor includes two travel
lanes (one in each direction) at the northern
and southern ends of the City. Within the most
densely developed part of the City, including
Downtown, the Highway Corridor includes
a center two-way left-turn lane in addition
to the single travel lanes in each direction.
The Highway Corridor is designated as a
truck route, as are the cross streets of Yolo
Street, Kern Street, Merced Street, Stanislaus
Street, and Inyo Avenue. In 2019, traffic
volumes ranged from approximately 7,250
to 9,100 vehicles per day in the Downtown,
with trucks making up 9.5 percent of traffic.
At the southern end of the Highway Corridor
and north of Stuhr Road the speed limit is
55 mph, while speed limits are lower in the
more densely developed areas. From Stuhr
Road to the intersection with Jensen Road
and Sherman Parkway at the city limit line the
speed limit is 45 mph, while between the city
limit line and the retail businesses south of
Inyo Avenue the speed limit is 35 mph.
The Union Pacific Railroad tracks run parallel
to the Highway Corridor through Newman,
creating a barrier to circulation between the
City’s older west side and newer subdivisions
to the east. The only rail crossings are at
Sherman Parkway, Kern Street, Merced Street,
and Inyo Avenue; the longest section without
a crossing of the tracks is between Kern
Street and Sherman Parkway, a distance of
0.7 miles. Merced Street and Kern Street are
the only signalized intersections along the
Highway Corridor, and the City is planning
to install a traffic signal at the Inyo Avenue
intersection. All other intersections are stopcontrolled on the minor street approaches.
The portion of the Highway Corridor between
Inyo Avenue and Yolo Street includes a
variety of retail uses with the majority of
retail activity occurring on Main Street to the
west. Sidewalks vary in width and quality
and there are numerous gaps. Some street
trees are present along the Highway Corridor,
providing a buffer between pedestrians and
vehicle traffic. The only marked pedestrian
crossings of Highway 33 are at the signalized
intersections of Kern Street and Merced
Street, and the design for the traffic signal at
the Inyo Avenue intersection also includes
crosswalks. There are no existing bicycle
facilities, and while there is transit service
along the Highway Corridor, there are no bus
stops.
While on-street parking is available and
allowable along both sides of the Highway
Corridor, it is not frequently used on the entire
corridor as most homes and businesses
provide off-street parking. On-street parking
is more commonly used along Main Street
as well as cross-streets in the center of the
City, notably Merced Street, Fresno Street,
Tulare Street, and Kern Street. A more detailed
review of traffic characteristics is provided in
the technical appendix. Section IV.5 identifies
segment-specific improvements for the
Highway Corridor.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-10
2. Street Classifications
Table 2-3: Street Classifications establishes the street configurations and circulation improvements for the Highway Corridor. Street improvements shall be made consistent with the General Plan and Public Works standards, where applicable.
Table 2-3: Street Classifications
Street Classifications Configuration/Specification
Arterial 2-4 lanes
Collector Street 2 lanes
Class I Multi-Use Path 8-foot separated paved multi-use path Buffered Bike Lane
5-foot bike lane, on grade with vehicular
traffic with 1-foot striped buffer between
travel and bicycle lane
Bike Lane 6-foot bike lane, on grade with vehicular
traffic, with no buffer
Example of a buffered bike lane in a rural setting
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-11
Sherman Pkwy.
E. Stuhr Rd.
Yolo St.
Jensen Rd.
Mariposa St.
Kern St.
Hwy 33
Future pedestrian
and bike
improvements
RR
Specific Plan Boundary
Legend
New Traffic Signal Enhanced Intersection
N RR Railroad Crossing
Arterial
Collector Street
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Proposed Separated Multi-Use Path (Class I)
Sharrows Bike Lane (Class III) Enhanced Intersection
(RRFB Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacon) Existing Traffic Signal Local Street
Railroad Track
Existing Separated Multi-Use Path (Class I)
0 100 500 FT
Existing Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Shoulder Bike Lane
HAWK Signal
MATCHLINE
Hwy 33 Circulation Overview Map - E Stuhr Rd. to Mariposa St. Figure 8a. Hwy 33 Circulation Overview Map - E Stuhr Rd. to Mariposa St.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-12
Figure X. Circulation Overview Map (Kern St. to Shields Rd.) Kern St.
Tulare St.
Merced St.
Stanislaus St.
Inyo Ave.
Shields Rd.
Fresno St.
Hwy 33
Hwy 33
RR
RR
RR
RR
MATCHLINE
Hwy 33 Circulation Overview Map - Kern St. to Shields Rd.
Specific Plan Boundary
Legend
New Traffic Signal Enhanced Intersection
N RR Railroad Crossing
Arterial
Collector Street
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Proposed Separated Multi-Use Path (Class I)
Sharrows Bike Lane (Class III) Enhanced Intersection
(RRFB Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacon) Existing Traffic Signal Local Street
Railroad Track
Existing Separated Multi-Use Path (Class I)
0 100 500 FT
Existing Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
Shoulder Bike Lane
HAWK Signal
Figure 8b. Hwy 33 Circulation Overview Map - Kern St. to Shields Rd.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-13
3. Key Issues and
Considerations
Several key themes were identified during the
community outreach and analysis portion in
approaching the Highway Corridor redesign;
although how the recommendations address
these themes varies, depending on context.
• Provide protection from vehicle traffic:
To create a corridor that offers a more
comfortable and attractive environment for
pedestrians and bicyclists, greater protection
should be provided from vehicle traffic. While
sidewalks are present in the Downtown, only
shoulders are available for pedestrians at
the north and south ends of the Highway
Corridor. Bicyclists can use the shoulders
along the northern and southern Highway
Corridor segments but must share the road
with vehicle traffic through Downtown. Given
the volume of truck traffic through the area,
this can be intimidating to many bicyclists.
• Improve street crossings: Pedestrian
circulation could be enhanced with the
addition of design treatments at uncontrolled
crossings near retail businesses, schools,
and other land uses that people would
typically access on foot.
• Consider vehicle circulation needs: Any
proposed design modifications should
include circulation needs for trucks, given
the truck volumes on the Highway Corridor,
and needs of local businesses which are
focused on agricultural services.
An example of a buffered bike lane providing
protection from vehicular traffic
An example of a streetscape enhanced with
pedestrian amenities
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-14
4. Mobility Goals and Policies
The following circulation goals and policies
provide a framework for the development
of all street and circulation routes along the
Highway Corridor. Circulation improvements
along the Highway Corridor are intended to
improve function, pedestrian/bicyclist safety,
and comfort, maintain adequate operations,
and add aesthetic enhancement.
Goal B: Improve safety along the Highway
Corridor for all modes of travel.
Policy B.1 Establish a multi-use pathway on the
east side of Highway 33 paralleling the railroad
right-of-way from Stuhr Road to Yolo Street.
Policy B.2 Install pedestrian-activated
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs)
at the following locations:
• Highway 33 and Yolo Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Mariposa Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Fresno Street intersection
Policy B.3 Delineate and install a striped
buffered bike lane from Yolo Street to south of
Inyo Avenue.
Goal C: Consider new signals at key
intersections as needed to maintain adequate
traffic operations and provide protection for
pedestrians.
Policy C.1 Install a new traffic or HAWK signal
at the following intersections:
• Highway 33 and Stuhr Road intersection
• Highway 33 and Jensen Road/Sherman
Parkway intersection (or full traffic signal)
• Highway 33 and Inyo Avenue intersection
• Highway 33 at mid-block location south of
Inyo Avenue
Policy C.2 Improve the following intersections
with enhanced intersection improvements,
such as new realigned crosswalks with highly
visible crosswalk treatments:
• Highway 33 and Jensen Road / Sherman
Parkway intersection
• Highway 33 and Inyo Avenue intersection
• Highway 33 at mid-block location south of
Inyo Avenue
• Highway 33 and Yolo Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Mariposa Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Fresno Street intersection
Policy C.3 Install improved crosswalks with
accent paving at intersections on either end of
the Downtown District.
• Highway 33 and Kern Street intersection
• Highway 33 and Merced Street intersection
Goal D: Provide amenity improvements along
the Highway Corridor, where appropriate.
Policy D.1 Provide for adequate streetscape,
landscape, lighting and street tree improvements
along the Highway Corridor.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-15
5. Best Practices Toolbox
A number of circulation treatments were considered and identified as appropriate for addressing various needs along the Highway Corridor.
Multi-Use Path (Class I)
• Separates pedestrians and bicyclists from
vehicle traffic
• Enhances comfort for users of varying ages
and abilities
• Appeals to recreational users
Buffered Bike Lane (Class II)
• Provides greater shy (buffer) distance
between motor vehicles and bicyclists
• Provides space for bicyclists to pass another
bicyclist without encroaching into the vehicle
travel lane
• Encourages bicycling by contributing to the
perception of safety among users of the
bicycle network
High-Visibility Green Bike Lane
Striping
• Applied at high conflict zones, such as
commercial driveways
• Alerts drivers and helps them anticipate
bicyclists
• Designates space for bicycles and helps to
maintain safe positioning in roadway
A class I multi-use path provides comfort
for a variety of users
A class II buffered bike lane allows for an
enhanced perception of safety
High-visibility green bike lane striping
emphasizes bicyclist paths at high conflict
zones
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-16
Narrower Vehicle Lane
• Promotes slower driving speeds
• Reduces the likelihood/severity of crashes
• Need to use lane width appropriate for use of
that street, such as buses and heavy trucks
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
(RRFB)
• Increases driver awareness of pedestrians
• Requires pedestrian activation, minimizing
impact on vehicle circulation
• Effective near schools and other locations
with high pedestrian volumes
Curb Extension
• Reduces crossing distance, allowing
pedestrians to cross more safely
• Provides additional visibility and protection
for pedestrians, especially children
• Slows and calms traffic, particularly fast
traffic turning from a major to a minor road
HAWK Signal
• Similar to traffic signal, stops traffic on red
phase
• Pedestrian-activated, otherwise does not
impact traffic flow
• Advance Yield Markings (“shark’s teeth”)
• Increases awareness of drivers to upcoming
pedestrian crossings
• Used to supplement standard crosswalk
striping
A narrower vehicle lane reduces likelihood of
accidents while lowering driving speeds
RRFBs alert drivers to pedestrians while
minimizing impacts on vehicular circulation
Curb extensions slow vehicular traffic while
enhancing safety of pedestrian crossings
HAWK signals stops vehicular traffic while
allowing pedestrian crossing
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-17
Figure 9. Section Locations
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-18
6. Corridor Segment Recommendations
Application of the toolbox treatments varies depending on the context of each segment. The HSP recommends the following, beginning at the north end of the Highway Corridor and moving south. Refer to Figure 9: Section Locations.
Stuhr Road to Jensen Road/Sherman
Parkway
From Stuhr Road to Jensen Road/Sherman
Parkway, development is low-density and traffic
travels at higher speeds creating a challenging
environment for pedestrians and bicyclists.
• To provide regional connectivity to points
north of Newman, a multi-use, two-way
path should be constructed; the path would
provide a more protected environment for
pedestrians and bicyclists than the road
shoulders they currently use. The multi-use
path could be constructed within Caltrans
right-of-way along the east side of the
Highway Corridor. Due to the presence of the
railroad tracks, users would not be required
to cross any intersections.
• The Sherman Parkway/Jensen Road
intersection marks a transition between
rural land uses and a greater concentration
of residential and commercial land uses.
While Jensen Road is currently narrow and
not suitable for carrying higher volumes of
traffic and pedestrian/bike modes, planned
development in the area would require
widening of the roadway and enhancements
to serve all modes of transportation. With
these enhancements, Jensen could become
a future walking or biking route to school for
residents of neighborhoods east of Sherman
Parkway. Given the speed of north-south
traffic along the Highway Corridor at this
intersection, traffic controls such as a traffic
signal or HAWK would likely be required to
provide adequate safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists crossing at this location. In the
future with upgrades to pedestrian facilities
on Jenson Road, a crosswalk of SR33 should
be provided. At a minimum, this crosswalk
should be controlled with a HAWK signal
which is exclusively for use by pedestrians
and bicyclists crossing the street. If future
vehicle traffic growth dictates and/or if
Caltrans determines that the intersection as
a whole is in need of enhanced traffic control,
a full traffic signal should be installed.
• The Highway 33/Stuhr Road intersection
could be redesigned as a roundabout, which
could accommodate future growth and serve
as a gateway treatment for southbound
drivers entering Newman.
• The existing roadway cross-section should
be maintained to accommodate the needs
of vehicle traffic.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-19
Figure 10. Stuhr Road to Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway Street Section A An example of a multi-use path adjacent to residential uses City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-20
Figure 11. Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway Lane Configuration City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-21
Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway to
Yolo Street
This segment has a transitional character, as
the northern end of the segment is more rural
while the southern end is the entry point to
Downtown. Since Sherman Parkway crosses
the railroad tracks, it is also a primary access
point for eastside residents attempting to
access the Highway Corridor. At the Yolo Street
intersection, there is a distinct shift between a
higher speed environment to the north and an
“in-town” feel to the south. It is also a primary
connector from Highway 33 to Orestimba High
School and Lions Park, as there are bike lanes
on Yolo Street from Highway 33 to Hardin Road.
• A Class I multi-use path is recommended
along the east side of Highway 33 between
the roadway and the railroad tracks, using
Caltrans and City right-of-way, extending to
the eastern terminus of Yolo Street. This path
would provide connectivity to the existing
path along Sherman Parkway, as well as the
proposed path extending north to Stuhr Road.
• An enhanced pedestrian crossing should be
provided on the north leg of the Highway 33/
Yolo Street intersection, including RRFBs, curb
extensions, and advance yield markings. This
would tie into the recommended multi-use path,
connect to the pocket park on the southeast
corner of the intersection, and serve students at
the middle school and high school.
• To provide connectivity for bicyclists between
the Yolo Street crossing and the multi-use
path, Yolo Street east of Highway 33 should be
designated as a Class III bike route.
• Copeland Park along the south side of Yolo
Street should be expanded by narrowing
the angled roadway along the south side.
Currently this operates as a two-way street;
with the reduced width it would become a oneway street with access only from Highway 33.
Figure 12. South of Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway to Yolo Street Section B City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-22
Figure 13. Yolo Street Lane Configuration
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-23
Conceptual birdseye rendering of Copeland Park expansion and enhancement City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-24
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
(Includes Downtown Core)
The segment from Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue is
the most densely developed part of the corridor,
running through the center of Newman. The
eastern side of the street is primarily lined with
industrial uses and undeveloped parcels, while
the western side forms the edge of the main
business district. The only two signalized
intersections in the corridor are located in this
segment, at the intersections of Merced Street
and Kern Street.
• Class II bike lanes are recommended along
both sides of Highway 33, as identified in the
City’s Bicycle Master Plan. Given the vehicle
speeds and truck traffic, the design should
include a one-foot-wide striped buffer to
create a more comfortable environment for
bicyclists by separating them from traffic.
The bike lanes and buffer could be created
by eliminating on-street parking along the
frontage of the uses on the east side of
Highway 33 and repurposing the available
pavement. If at a later date, travel lanes can
be narrowed to 11 feet, the striped buffers
can be enlarged to 2.5 feet each. Additional
information regarding the use of narrower
travel lanes is provided in Appendix A.
• New uncontrolled pedestrian crossings at
Mariposa Street and Fresno Street should
be enhanced by installing RRFBs, curb
extensions, and advance yield markings.
Traffic signals would not be warranted at
these locations based on existing traffic
volumes.
Figure 14. North of Yolo Street Section C (Multi-use path west of railroad tracks) City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-25
Figure 15. Mariposa Street to Kern Street Lane Configuration City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-26
Conceptual birdseye rendering of Kern Street and Highway 33 intersection Conceptual birdseye rendering of Fresno Street and Highway 33 intersection City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-27
Figure 16. Tulare Street to Fresno Street Lane Configuration City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-28
Figure 17. Merced Street to Stanislaus Street Lane Configuration City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-29
Figure 18. North of Fresno Street Section D1 and North of Stanislaus Street Section D2 City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-30
Inyo Avenue to City/County Line
There is a cluster of retail businesses just
south of the Inyo Avenue intersection, and
south of that point Highway 33 transitions
to a rural two-lane roadway with higher
speeds.
• The bike lanes in central Newman should
be extended to provide access to the
retail businesses south of Inyo Avenue,
and continue along this segment to the
Stanislaus/Merced County line, eventually
connecting to Gustine.
• Green bike lane striping should be added
on the north and south approaches and
through the Inyo Avenue intersection to
highlight zones where there are potential
conflicts with turning vehicles.
• If the City completes the planned
signalization of the Inyo intersection
before the proposed bike lanes are
installed, staff should work with Caltrans
to determine if the concept plan design is
consistent with local circulation needs. If
it is necessary to retain the northbound and
southbound right-turn lanes, there would
not be sufficient space to accommodate
bike lanes on the
intersection approaches; therefore, the
concept plan design should be modified
by adding shared lane markings in the
turn lanes to guide bicyclists through the
intersection.
• A new mid-block crossing, approximately
450 feet south of Inyo Avenue, should be
provided to improve pedestrian access
between the retail uses on the east and
west sides of the roadway. The crossing
should include a HAWK signal, a curb
extension on the west side of the street,
and advance yield markings. This would
require striping modifications due to
the wide paved area along the shopping
center frontage. Slower speeds could
be encouraged by striping parking tees
to visually narrow the roadway in this
section.
• South of the shopping center, retain the
existing striping, with the existing twoway left turn lane tapering down to a twolane roadway further south. Pedestrian and bicycle access would continue to be
provided along the shoulders.
Example of Class II bike lanes
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-31
Conceptual birdseye rendering of Inyo Avenue and Highway 33 intersection City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-32
Figure 19. Inyo Avenue Lane Configuration
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-33
Figure 20. Mid-Block Crossing, South of Inyo Avenue Lane Configuration City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-34
Figure 21. South of Inyo Avenue Street Section E
An example of pedestrian amenities provided along the sidewalk City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-35
7. Streetscape Concept
Streetscape beautification identifies
opportunities to enhance the streetscape
while creating a safe and enjoyable pedestrian
environment. Beautification creates visual
interest, acts as an investment catalyst,
produces new spaces for public use, and
encourages social exchanges.
The appearance of the Highway Corridor plays
an important role in the image and character
of Newman. The streetscape will indicate
that one is entering the City of Newman and
should slow driving speeds. Streetscape
improvements, such as street trees, planters,
street furniture, lighting, paving, painted utility
boxes, and coordinated signage will add in
unifying and improving not only the Highway
Corridor, but also the City of Newman. As
one enters Newman, the street trees will be
more organically spaced in clusters. Closer
to the Downtown core, the trees will be evenly
spaced, emphasizing the downtown district.
New bike lanes and separated bike paths will
connect the north end of town on Highway 33
to the south end of town. Refer to Section III
for additional urban design guidelines.
8. Gateway and Directional
Signage
Gateway signage is instrumental in providing
both a sense of arrival and sense of place.
Gateways and directional signage are proposed
along the Highway Corridor to further identify
the Highway Corridor to visitors and residents.
Figure 3: Opportunities and Constraints
indicates the location of gateway features
within the Highway Corridor.
Directional signage provides nearby locations
and promotes local amenities
Downtown gateway identifies downtown core
to visitors and residents
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-36
C. Infrastructure and
Public Facilities Plan
This section of the Plan addresses
infrastructure and public facilities necessary
to support the level of development permitted
under the Specific Plan. Facilities required
to serve the Plan Area include water, sewer,
storm drainage, police, fire, utilities and public
facilities. The center portion of the Specific
Plan area is currently served by municipal
infrastructure. The areas lying outside the City
limit boundaries within the Plan Area are not
currently served.
1. Specific Plan Infrastructure
Diagram
The Infrastructure Plan (Figure 22) serves as the
design schematic for backbone infrastructure
improvements within the Plan Area but does not
represent specific alignments or locations for
facilities. Individual project level infrastructure
improvements are not indicated as part of the
Specific Plan.
2. Infrastructure Goals,
Objectives, and Policies
The following infrastructure goals and policies
set forth the framework for the development
of all infrastructure and public facilities within
the Plan Area. Infrastructure improvements
will provide adequate facilities to serve
development of the Plan Area at buildout.
Goal C: To provide the necessary infrastructure
improvement to serve the entire Plan Area at
buildout.
Infrastructure Cost Sharing
Objective C.1: Distribute cost burden of
infrastructure facilities proportionally among
all projects based on received benefit.
Infrastructure Cost Sharing Policies:
C.1.a. Developers that install oversized
facilities consistent with the Specific
Plan and benefiting other
parts of the Plan Area shall
be reimbursed. A reimbursement
agreement shall be secured at
the appropriate time in the approval
process.
C.1.b. Cost of infrastructure improvements
shall be distributed throughout the
Plan Area based on the relative
benefit as defined by the City Wide
Services Master Plan (CWSMP)
and City development policies.
Water System
Objective C.2: All development within the Plan
Area shall be served by City water services.
Implementation Policies:
C.2.a. The City water system shall be
expanded and extended to serve all
projected development within the Plan
Area.
C.2.b. All private wells within the Plan Area
shall be abandoned and sealed
following connection to City
water system.
C.2.c. Provide water system improvement
consistent with Table 2-4.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-37
Location Service Improvements Needed
North Zone
Stuhr Road to Yolo Street
1. Replace 6” water main from well 5 with 10”
water main to Highway 33.
2. Construct a 10” water main from Sherman
Parkway/Jensen Road North along
Highway 33 to Stuhr Road and then West
on Stuhr Road.
3. Construct 14” water main from well 5 North
along Highway 33 to Sherman Parkway/
Jensen Road.
4. Construct 16” water main along Jensen
Road connecting the existing 12” water
main on Sherman Parkway with the
existing 16” water main at Fig Lane and
Jensen Road.
Central Zone
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
1. M Street: Extend 8” water line from Kern
south to Fresno.
South Zone
Inyo Avenue to southern
boundary
1. Construct 12” main south along highway
to County line.
2. Construct 12” main along Parkway
alignment to Prince Street.
3. Construct 8” main from Stonegate tract to
Parkway along Prince Street.
4. Construct well off Prince Street.
Table 2-4: Required Water System Improvements
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-38
Sewer System
Objective C.3. All development and parcels within the Plan Area shall be served by the City sewer system.
Implementation Policies:
C.3.a. The phased extension of sewer facilities shall be permitted as approved by City engineer.
C.3.b. Sewer improvements shall be made consistent with Table 2-5.
Location Service Improvements Needed
North Zone
Stuhr Road to Yolo Street
1. Construct 12” sanitary sewer from
existing 12” North on Highway 33 to Stuhr
and West on Stuhr.
2. Construct 15” sewer connecting the
proposed Jensen Road Improvements
to the Existing Sherman Parkway sewer
main at the intersection of Jensen Road,
Sherman Parkway, and Highway 33.
Central Zone
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
1. M Street: extend 10” main from Merced to
Kern.
2. Highway 33: extend 8” main from Inyo
North to Fresno.
South Zone (Alternative 1)
Inyo Avenue to southern
boundary
1. Construct M Street lift station.
2. Construct 18” sanitary sewer along Inyo
from M Street West to Prince Street.
3. Construct 15” sanitary sewer South from
Inyo to Parkway.
4. Construct 8” sanitary sewer along East
side of Highway 33 North and South from
existing 12” sanitary sewer.
South Zone (Alternative 2)
Inyo Avenue to southern
boundary
1. Construct temporary lift station on
Highway 33 at existing 12” main.
2. Construct deep line along Highway 33
from existing 12” main South to County
line.
Table 2-5: Required Sewer System Improvements
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-39
Storm Drain System
Objective C.4. Provide adequate storm drainage throughout the Plan Area that will serve future development and correct pre-existing flooding conditions.
Implementation Policies:
C.4.a. Construct adequate storm drainage lines and detention areas to serve the entire project area.
C.4.b. Phased improvement of storm drainage facilities shall be allowed as approved by the City engineer.
C.4.c. Storm drainage improvements shall be consistent with the infrastructure diagram and Table 2-6.
Location Service Improvements Needed
North Zone
Stuhr Road to Yolo Street 1. Construct storm drain facilities from the basin on the North side of Jensen Road
East to Highway 33 and continuing
North along Highway 33 to Stuhr Road
continuing West on Stuhr Road terminating
between Fig Lane and Highway 33.
Improvements consist of 18”, 24”, and 30”
pipelines described in the NWMP.
2. Construct 18” storm drain East from Scott
Street to Blue Bonnet Drive and to Balsam
Drive.
3. Construct 18” storm drain South to 30”
storm drain at Yolo Street.
4. Construct 30” storm drain line connecting
the Sherman Parkway ditch with the
Jensen Road open channel/pipeline.
5. Construct detention basin facilities as
required by the NWMP. Size and final
location to be determined by the City.
Central Zone
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue 1. None Required
Table 2-6: Required Storm Drain System Improvements
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-40
Location Service Improvements Needed
South Zone
Inyo Avenue to southern
boundary
1. Construct storm drain along Highway 33
from shopping center South to County line.
2. Construct 3.9 acre detention pond at Miller
Ditch near Highway 33. Improvements
are associated with the Mattos Ranch
Development.
3. Construct pump to pump from detention
pond to ditch. Improvements are
associated with the Mattos Ranch
Development.
4. Construct East/West storm drain from
Prince Street to Highway 33. Improvements
are associated with the Mattos Ranch
Development.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-41
Police and Fire Protection
Objective C.5. Provide for adequate public
safety, public facilities and services throughout
the Plan Area.
Implementation Policies:
C.5.a. Fire protection will be provided by the
Newman Fire Department.
C.5.b. Police services shall be provided by
the City of Newman Police
Department throughout the Plan Area
as annexation occurs.
Energy and Communication Facilities
Objective C.6. Provide adequate energy and
communication facilities to serve the Plan
Area. (Service providers as of October, 2021)
Implementation Policies:
C.6.a. The City shall ensure that energy and
communications services are
provided, either through direct city
provision, contract, or franchise.
C.6.b. Electrical services may be provided by
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E).
C.6.c. Street lighting shall be provided
along all streets per City of Newman
Improvement Standards.
C.6.d. Natural gas may be provided by PG&E.
C.6.e. Telephone service may be provided by
AT&T.
C.6.f. Cable television may be provided by
Comcast/Xfinity.
C.6.g. All utilities should be installed
underground or programmed
for relocation underground.
Solid Waste Disposal
Objective C.7. Provide for solid waste pick-up
services throughout the Plan Area.
Implementation Policies:
C.7.a. Solid waste pick-up shall be provided
by City of Newman or by private
vendors under the provision of
franchise agreements with the City.
C.7.b. Common dumpsters provided for
commercial and office developments
shall be enclosed in masonry walls
and screened with landscaping
in a way that it is consistent with the
overall project design.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
2 2-42
Sherman Pkwy.
E. Stuhr Rd.
Yolo St.
Jensen Rd.
Kern St.
Hwy 33
Hwy 33
Mariposa St.
Merced St.
Inyo Ave.
Fresno St.
Stanislaus County
Merced County
N St.
Shields Rd.
Mattos Ranch Basin
Potential basin
location from
NWNP
Specific Plan Boundary
Figure x. Infrastructure Diagram
Legend
N
0 500 1000 FT
City Limits
Infrastructure Zones
North Zone
Central Zone
South Zone Sanitary Sewer
Water
Storm Drain
Detention Basin
Connection Point to
Existing Infrastructure
Police Facility
Fire Station
Figure 22. Infrastructure Plan
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Comprehensive Goals and Policies
This page intentionally left blank
URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3 3
3-1
III. Urban Design Guidelines
The Urban Design Guidelines are intended to guide site design, architecture, and landscaping for projects located along the Highway Corridor. The Guidelines will be enforced as part of the City’s Architectural Review and/ or Site Plan Review process by the Architectural Review Committee and/ or Planning Commission. The Guidelines address such issues as historic context, building siting and orientation, architectural character, parking lot location, building signage, pedestrian linkages, roof design, and wall forms. The Guidelines allow flexibility and creativity in building and site design, provided that development retains the underlying principles of creating an attractive, safe, human-scaled environment consistent with Newman’s small-town character.
A. Organization
Two types of Urban Design Guidelines are provided for the Highway Corridor: Downtown District Guidelines and Highway District Guidelines. Figure 23: Urban Design Districts indicates the boundaries of each of these Urban Design Districts. The reviewing bodies shall have discretion to apply guidelines outside of an Urban Design District as necessary.
Existing site photo of architectural features along Highway 33 City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-2
Sherman Pkwy.
E. Stuhr Rd.
Yolo St.
Jensen Rd.
Kern St.
Hwy 33
Hwy 33
Mariposa St.
Merced St.
Inyo Ave.
Fresno St.
Stanislaus County
Merced County
N St.
Shields Rd.
Specific Plan Boundary
Figure x. Urban Design Districts
Legend
N
0 500 1000 FT
Downtown District Design Guidelines
Highway District Design Guidelines
City Limits
Figure 23. Urban Design Districts
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-3
B. General Design
Guidelines
Beautification Design Guidelines
The purpose of the beautification guidelines is to
provide beautification enhancements along the
Highway Corridor to improve the aesthetic quality
and experience, unify the character of Newman,
and identify to drivers they are entering the City
of Newman.
1.1 Add enhanced downtown gateway
signage along the Highway Corridor at
Merced and Kern Streets as you enter
Downtown.
1.2 Add directional signage in key locations
around Downtown and along the
Highway Corridor.
1.3 Use accent paving and crosswalk
enhancements in the Downtown District
to identify the downtown core, slow
traffic, and to provide for pedestrian
safety.
1.4 Integrate public art/utility box art into
site design and improvements, where
appropriate.
Streetscape enhancements include
accent paving and street lights
Enhanced gateway monuments provide a
sense of entry
Painted utility boxes enhance and
beautify streetscapes
Downtown entry monument helps identify
the downtown core
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-4
Consider providing bike racks in
the Downtown District
Street trees with holiday string
lights
1.5 Install traditional bike racks along the Highway
Corridor, particularly in the Downtown District,
where appropriate.
1.6 Install additional street lights along the corridor to help unify the streetscape and provide additional
light for pedestrians.
1.7 Incorporate additional street furniture along the
corridor such as benches, trash and recycling
cans, and planters.
1.8 Add planters with low maintenance plants in
downtown district.
1.9 Add string lights to street trees for holiday seasons.
Planters with low maintenance
plants
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-5
Sign Design Guidelines
The purpose of the signage guidelines is to create a
comprehensive, unified, and balanced system for private signage along the Highway Corridor, ensuring tenant
identification within an overall design. All tenant’s signs must complement the architectural design of their particular project/building. The following guidelines provide guidance for the way signs are designed, constructed, and placed.
1.8 Provide commercial signage that is
architecturally unified with its associated
development; all building signage should be
incorporated into the building design.
1.9 Design structures with specific consideration
for adequate signing, including provisions for
sign placement, sign scale in relation to building
scale, and readability.
Signage that is compatible
with associated development
enhances design
Awnings can be an effective
location for signage
Building design should consider
sign placement, sign scale, and
readability
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-6
Building materials reflect Main
Street architectural influences
C. Downtown District:
Architectural Character
Architectural character in Newman is reflective of a
variety of styles and influences from the past 100 years.
The buildings and structures along Highway 33 in the
Downtown District should draw from the Main Street
architectural influences such as turn of the century
commercial brick styles, Western, Art Deco, Spanish, and Agrarian architectural character.
Intent: Encourage buildings in the Downtown District to incorporate an architectural style that reflects the smalltown character of Newman.
Architectural Character Guidelines
2.1 Incorporate quality building materials consistent
with the architectural styles in downtown such as
brick, lap siding, board and batten siding, and
stucco.
2.2 Encourage remodels or new buildings to use
historic architectural influences in building
designs.
2.3 Allow for modern interpretations of styles to
continue the evolution of styles through history.
2.4 Consider Newman’s small-town scale and
demonstrate sensitivity to the design context of
the surrounding area.
2.5 Encourage roof parapets that are well detailed,
three dimensional, and of substantial size
to complement a building’s architectural character.
Consider small-town scale and
context with buildings
Three dimensional parapet
complements building character
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-7
D. Downtown District:
Building Siting and Parking
Building placement in relationship to Highway 33 and
Downtown is important for enhancing and improving
Highway Corridor circulation, character, and quality.
Intent: Locate buildings to encourage pedestrian circulation, provide linkages to Main Street, strengthen a “street wall” edge along Highway 33, and diminish the visual impact of automobiles.
Building Siting and Parking Guidelines
3.1 Buildings and plazas should be oriented towards
the site’s primary public street and placed at the
property lines (back of sidewalk) to define the
street frontage and pedestrian areas. Where
buildings are not placed at the property line, a
publicly accessible outdoor use area should be
provided.
3.2 Locate prominent buildings on corners and at the
terminus of vistas to maximize their visual impact.
3.3 Locate a building’s entry doors, windows, and
storefronts to adjoin sidewalk frontages. Lengthy
blank walls are discouraged.
3.4 Locate parking lots and service loading areas in
the middle of each block.
3.5 Carefully screen parking areas, storage areas,
mechanical systems, and refuse facilities from
view using a combination of landscaping and
effective architectural design.
3.6 Locate parking lots behind or adjacent to
buildings and discourage their location in front of
buildings.
Orient buildings to the street to
better define pedestrian areas
Corner buildings maximize their
visual impact
Entry doors at sidewalk frontages
encourage pedestrian circulation
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-8
Pedestrian friendly design includes
large windows
E. Downtown District:
Pedestrian Orientation
Newman’s pedestrian-friendly Downtown is located
adjacent to Highway 33 and provides potential to expand pedestrian circulation and commercial access opportunities for businesses along both Main Street and Highway 33.
Buildings and development projects along Highway 33
should be thoughtfully designed to accommodate and
encourage pedestrian circulation and orientation between Highway 33 and Main Street.
Intent: Encourage all development in the Downtown District to incorporate pedestrian-friendly designs.
Pedestrian Orientation Guidelines
4.1 Provide pedestrian oriented building elevations
and facades, incorporating large windows and
doors, sitting places, and landscaping.
4.2 Encourage outdoor seating areas, such as small
plazas and cafe pockets.
4.3 Provide pedestrian linkages between Highway 33
and Main Street. Outdoor seating encourages
pedestrian orientation and circulation
Consider integrating pedestrian
linkages to enhance circulation
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-9
F. Highway District:
Architectural Character
The buildings and structures along Highway 33 should
complement the rural and small-town character of
Newman and the surrounding region. New and remodeled
buildings outside of Downtown should follow a Rural/
Agrarian theme. This theme is based on the agricultural and packing industries that support the region. The Rural/ Agrarian theme will complement Downtown and existing
industrial development while also adding desired character to modern retail and office buildings.
Intent: Encourage buildings in the Highway District to
incorporate a Rural/Agrarian theme that reflects the
character and economy of the region.
Architectural Character Guidelines
5.1 Buildings in the Highway District should consider
integrating the Rural Agrarian theme into the
proposed building design.
5.2 The following types of buildings are consistent
with the Rural Agrarian theme:
a. Railroad buildings;
b. Warehouses;
c. Barns/agricultural; and/or
d. Grain elevators.
5.3 Incorporate wall forms, pitched roof forms,
signage, materials, and colors that reinforce the
architectural theme of a given building.
5.4 Encourage unique project icons and landmark
features.
Architectural character reflects the
Rural/Agrarian character of the
region
Steep pitched roof forms reflect
barn character
Metal siding and roof forms reflect
an Agrarian character
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-10
Building articulation with an
Agrarian theme
G. Highway District: Building
Walls and Massing
A building, when broken down into its basic components, consists of three primary elements: 1. walls, 2. roofs,
3. openings (windows, doors, and storefronts). A well
designed building, whether historic or contemporary in
design, will creatively combine these elements to produce an appealing structure. In order to implement the desired Rural/Agrarian theme, a building’s walls, roofs, and
openings need to be consistent with its theme and reflect its architectural character.
Intent: Encourage the creative use of walls, roof forms, and openings to produce buildings which are consistent with the Rural/Agrarian theme.
Building Walls and Massing Guidelines
6.1 Articulate building walls, both horizontally and
vertically, through the use of wall offsets,
recessed windows and entries, and awnings.
6.2 Avoid “boxy” structures with large, flat wall planes by articulating building forms, elevations,
and rooflines.
6.3 Creatively use wall materials to reinforce the
theme of Newman’s Downtown. Encouraged
materials include but are not limited to:
a. Brick,
b. Wood lap siding,
c. Board and batten siding,
d. Stucco, and/or
e. Metal siding.
Provide articulation with wall
offsets and recessed windows
Building materials reflect the
theme of Newman’s Downtown
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-11
H. Highway District: Roof Form
and Materials
Roof design is an important factor in a building’s overall character. Elements like roof shape, form, slope, material, texture, and color should be consistent with, and
representative of, the overall Rural/Agrarian character of the Highway District.
Intent: Encourage the use of consistent roof materials and forms which complement the existing Highway District
character.
Roofs Guidelines
7.1 Encourage multiform roofs containing interesting
combinations of the following elements:
a. Gables;
b. Sheds; and/or
c. Gambrel roofs.
7.2 Encourage use of roof details including dormers
and cupolas.
7.3 Encourage use of clerestory windows.
Multiform roofs enhance overall
building character
Roof materials reflect the Rural/
Agrarian character of the region
Clerestory windows are
representative of Agrarian
character
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-12
Window and door types reflect the
Rural/Agrarian character of the
region
I. Highway District: Windows and
Doors
Building openings refer to windows, doors, storefronts, and other interruptions in a facade. A building’s overall architectural character is highly influenced by the size, scale, color, and material of these elements.
Intent: Encourage the use of window, door, and storefront materials which reflect the Highway District’s Rural/Agrarian character.
Window and Door Guidelines
8.1 Ensure windows and doors, shape and type are
consistent with a building’s architectural style and
character.
8.2 Integrate clear glass, tenant signage, and window
displays within commercial storefronts to enliven
the sidewalk and pedestrian experience.
8.3 Encourage the use of awnings, canopies, and
arcades to accent building openings and provide
shelter from sun and/or rain.
Clear glass and tenant signage
enhance overall building character
Canopies provide pedestrians with
shelter from sun and/or rain
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
3 3-13
J. Highway District: Site Design
and Parking
Parking lot and building orientation is important for creating a well-designed vehicular and pedestrian street edge.
Properly designed parking lots will improve circulation and strengthen a building’s presence on a street and will provide patrons and employees with safe and convenient
parking. Appropriate landscaping also enhances parking
lot design by providing shade, greenery, and screening.
Intent: Encourage locating parking areas away from Highway 33 and provide landscaping for screening and aesthetic
purposes.
Parking Design Guidelines
9.1 Locate parking areas behind or to the side of
structures.
9.2 Provide a large canopy shade tree for every five
parking lot spaces.
9.3 Evenly distribute canopy trees throughout parking
lot areas to provide a balanced and broad canopy
of shade.
9.4 Adequately illuminate parking areas for safety.
Parking lot lighting fixtures should be downward
lit and consistent with the project’s architectural
character.
9.5 Provide pedestrian walkways and crosswalks
between buildings, adjoining uses, and parking
lots.
9.6 Provide bicycle parking throughout the Highway
Corridor and ensure it is consistent with the
Newman City Code.
Parking areas located behind or to
the side of structures strengthens
presence of a building
Parking area enhanced with
canopy trees
Pedestrian walkways within parking
lots enhance pedestrian circulation
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Urban Design Guidelines
This page intentionally left blank
IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING
4 4
4-1
IV. Implementation and Phasing
Section Four provides the necessary policy direction for implementation of the Highway 33 Specific Plan (HSP). Procedures for phasing, financing, administration, and amendment of the HSP are described in this Section.
A. Phasing
The priority of phased improvements for the Highway Corridor is consistent by community feedback received during the HSP update process. Improvements related to overall safety and the specific safety of pedestrians and bicyclists along the Highway Corridor shall be the first priority. These safety improvements would include separated multi-use paths, buffered bike lanes, intersection improvements, and improvements to slow vehicular traffic. Though important, beautification improvements are a lower priority for the Highway Corridor; however, should be implemented when funding is available. Refer to Section II for Circulation Overview figures and Corridor Segment Recommendations.
Though the HSP identifies priorities, many of the public improvements will be dependent on funding opportunities. Section IV.B provides information on financing mechanisms for improvements and recommendations included in the HSP. The limiting factors to phasing and annexation are the adequate provision of infrastructure and necessary support facilities.
Outlying development shall be permitted in early phases, provided adequate infrastructure and public facilities are provided. The phasing plan is not intended to preclude properties from developing, rather the phasing plan indicates the logical priority for infrastructure extensions.
Properties in later phases may develop ahead of these earlier phases; however, these properties would bear a greater up-front expenditure for off-site infrastructure improvements.
1. Annexation
Annexing areas that are not within the City, but are within the Highway Corridor should be prioritized. The HSP includes an area directly north of the city limits and south of E. Stuhr Road that is located within Stanislaus County jurisdiction. This area is part of the Northwest Newman Master Plan and is designated in the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence. The Primary Sphere of Influence distinguishes land that is anticipated to be annexed in the next ten or so years.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-2
B. Financing
A variety of financing mechanisms are available
to ensure proper distribution of system-wide
infrastructure costs. These mechanisms
include combinations of public and private
financing to cover the costs of backbone
infrastructure items such as major streets,
traffic signals, lighting, sewer extensions,
water systems, and storm drainage. Projectspecific infrastructure improvements include street frontage improvements, project-related
infrastructure improvements, landscaping and
related construction costs. Refer to Appendix
C for cost estimates.
1. Citywide Services Master
Plan
The Citywide Services Master Plan (CWSMP
adopted April 26, 2002) outlines infrastructure
facilities required to service the HSP area.
The CWSMP also outlines area costs to be
assessed for these facilities.
Specific development may require additions or
amendments to the CWMSP. The CWMSP and
City development policy will be used to assess
each specific development’s facilities impacts
and requirements. Required facilities and fees
will be assessed for each property consistent
with the CWMSP.
2. Financing Mechanisms
Possible avenues for financing backbone
infrastructure improvements could be pursued
through City administered impact fee programs
or Mello Roos districts. However, these
programs are dependent upon land values to
support improvement costs. At this time, it is
unknown whether the Highway Corridor could
support these types of assessment districts.
In addition to local funding, a number of
public funding sources may be available to
developments within the HSP area. Generally,
economic development fund programs are
tied to the creation or retention of jobs and
other social economic conditions within the
community. Although these programs vary
annually in terms of eligible projects and
available funding, they should nonetheless
be investigated for possible use along the
Highway Corridor. The following is a list of
possible funding sources that may be available.
Funding Sources
1. Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program
2. Economic Development Administration
(EDA) within the U.S. Department of
Commerce
3. Farmers Home Administration (FmHA)
business and community Development
programs
4. Caltrans and the Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP)
5. Rural Community Assistance Corporation
(RCAC)
6. Active Transportation Program
7. Urban Greening Program
8. Caltrans Clean California Grant program
9. Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ)
program
10. Affordable Housing Sustainable
Communities program
Hanging basket planters
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-3
3. Implementation Goals and
Policies
Goal: Provide for the orderly development
and financing of infrastructure improvements
within the HSP area.
Implementation Policies
1. Allow for the flexible phasing of
improvements within the HSP area.
2. Provide for the equitable distribution of
infrastructure costs and improvements
within the HSP area.
3. Plan for the phased installation of major
infrastructure improvements including streets,
roads, sewer, and water improvements.
4. Ensure infrastructure improvements and facilities
are consistent with the Citywide Services Master
Plan (2002) and the subsequent infrastructure
plans previously mentioned.
5. Pursue non-local funding sources to provide for
infrastructure improvements within the HSP area.
6. Prioritize improvements related to improving
the safety of pedestrian and bicyclists along
the Highway Corridor and improvements
that lower the greenhouse gas emissions
from vehicular transportation emissions.
7. Prioritize beautification improvements
including, but not limited to, signage,
street trees, accent paving or crosswalk
enhancements, painted utility boxes/
public art opportunities, string lights, and
bike racks after safety improvements
for pedestrians and bicyclists have been
implemented and/or funded.
4. Implementation Measures
The following implementation measures and
action items are intended only as a guide
in implementing the HSP and supporting
its recommended improvements. These
measures may be adjusted over time based
on new information, changing circumstances,
and evaluation of their effectiveness.
1. Coordinate with adjoining jurisdictions
regarding implementation at the northern
and southern limits of the HSP area to
provide continuous bicycle facilities and
regional active transportation options.
2. Coordinate with the County of Stanislaus,
City of Newman, and future development to
ensure compatibility of planned pedestrian
and bicycle improvements between the
HSP and Northwest Newman Master Plan.
3. Coordinate improvements along Jensen
Road. Improvements would require road
widening and provision of pedestrian and
bicycle facilities. With the resulting increase
in vehicle and pedestrian trips, the Highway
33 and Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway
intersection should be evaluated for traffic
controls. A pedestrian crossing could be
installed in conjunction with a traffic signal
or HAWK.
4. Coordinate with Caltrans to determine the
feasibility of constructing a multi-use path
between Sherman Parkway and Stuhr Road.
The City would need to work with Caltrans
to assess the available right-of-way. Rightof-way would also need to be investigated for the proposed path segment between
Yolo Street and Sherman Parkway, where
property owners include the City, Caltrans,
and Union Pacific. The alignment should
prioritize use of Caltrans and City property.
Highway 33 existing conditions
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-4
5. Consult with Caltrans at the time of project
implementation to revisit the lane widths on
Highway 33. While Caltrans District 10 staff
expressed concern regarding lanes less
than 12 feet wide on the Highway Corridor,
roadway design standards have been
evolving in recent years. This is exemplified
by Caltrans’ adoption of numerous policies in
recent years to encourage flexibility in street
design, its endorsement of the National
Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO) design guides, and its efforts to
address the needs of rural communities
where routes on the state highway system
serve regional travel needs while also being
a “main street” and the center of a local
commercial district. Additional information
regarding the use of narrower travel lanes is
provided in Appendix A.
6. City of Newman to assess and improve
sidewalks for a complete sidewalk network
and ADA access along Highway Corridor.
5. Improvement Projects
The following list is a comprehensive list of the
HSP Improvement Projects. Refer to Chapter 2,
Section B. Mobility for graphic representations
of improvements.
Intersection Improvements
• Jensen Road / Sherman Parkway and
Highway 33 (see Figure 11)
◦ HAWK signal or vehicular traffic signal
◦ New crosswalks (2)
◦ Bulb out/curb extension
• Yolo Street and Highway 33 (see Figure 13)
◦ Curb extensions
◦ New crosswalks
◦ Advance yield markings
◦ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFBs) pedestrian lights at the north leg
of Highway 33
• Mariposa Street and Highway 33 (see Figure 15)
◦ Curb extensions
◦ Advance yield markings
◦ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFBs) pedestrian lights
• Kern Street and Highway 33 (see Figure 15)
◦ Brick accent paving at crosswalks and in
center of intersection
• Fresno Street and Highway 33 (see Figure 16)
◦ Curb extensions
◦ Advance yield markings
◦ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFBs) pedestrian lights
• Merced Street and Highway 33 (see Figure
17)
◦ Brick accent paving at crosswalks and in
center of intersection
• Inyo Avenue and Highway 33 (see Figure 19)
◦ New vehicular traffic signal Bike storage
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-5
Mid-block Improvements
• South of Inyo Avenue (see Figure 19)
◦ New mid-block crossing with curb
extension on the west side of Highway 33
◦ Advance yield markings
◦ HAWK signal
◦ These improvements will require striping
modifications, such as striping tees
indicating parallel parking to visually
narrow the roadway, due to the wide paved
area along the shopping center frontage
• Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue (see Figure 14)
◦ Eliminate on-street parking along the east
side of Highway 33
Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements
• Multi-use, two-way separated path along
east side of Highway 33 between East Stuhr
Road and Sherman Parkway
• Multi-use, two-way separated path along
east side of Highway 33 between Sherman
Parkway and Yolo Street
• Future multi-use path connecting at Sherman
Parkway/Jensen Road intersection and
traveling west along Jensen Road as planned
development occurs in the immediate area
• Class III bike route/sharrows on north side
of Yolo Street between the Yolo Street and
Highway 33 intersection and the multi-use path
• Class II bike lanes with buffer on both sides
between Yolo Street and Inyo Avenue
• Extend Class II bike lanes south of Inyo
Avenue to the Stanislaus/Merced County
line, eventually connecting to Gustine
• Shared lane markings in turn lanes at Inyo
Avenue and Highway 33 intersection if
signalization of the intersection requires
northbound and southbound right-turn lanes
be maintained
• Green bike lane striping at north and south
approaches and through Inyo Avenue
intersection
Streetscape and Beautification
Improvements
• Accent street trees at intersections (see
Figure 15)
• Evenly spaced street trees in the Downtown
Core and organically spaced clusters of
trees outside of the Downtown Core (See
Figure 16)
• Copeland Park expansion and enhancements
(See Figure 13)
• Gateway Signage (see Figure 3)
• Downtown Entry Sign at Kern and Merced
Streets (see Figures 15 and 17)
• Streetscape improvements, such as planters,
benches, street furniture, lighting, painted
utility boxes
C. Administration
1. Existing Land Uses
Existing land uses, lawfully established prior
to the adoption of the HSP, shall be allowed to
continue operations and shall not be required
to conform with the provisions of the HSP.
However, if an existing use is discontinued for
a period of time greater than six (6) continuous
months, or if substantial improvements, equal
to or greater than 50 percent of the current
valuation of the existing use is proposed, the
entire use or operation shall conform to the
development standards established in the HSP.
2. Site Plans, Street
Improvement Plans, and
Subdivision Maps
The primary methods for implementing the
HSP are site plans, street improvement plans,
and parcel maps. Applications for site plans
(including architectural elevations) shall
be prepared for each individual building or
structure within the HSP area. The format,
content, and submittal requirements for
site plans shall be determined by the City
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-6
of Newman and shall be accompanied by
appropriate fees and necessary environmental
documentation. Parcel maps, or subdivision
maps, may also be permitted for land
development and construction purposes.
Applications for parcel map approval shall be
submitted to the City of Newman in a form
prescribed by the City along with supporting
documentation. All new parcels created within
the HSP project boundary shall comply with
lot size standards and other requirements set
forth in the Newman City Code. Applications
for street improvement plans will be primarily
city driven and consistent with the HSP.
3. Landscape Plan
Requirement
Prior to issuance of building permits for new
buildings or structures within the Highway Corridor,
the applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the
City of Newman indicating the type, location, and
size of plantings within all required areas. As part
of landscaping planting, a permanent irrigation
system shall also be installed.
4. Annexation
Any land outside City limits shall be annexed into
the City of Newman prior to recordation of final
subdivision maps or issuance of building permits.
5. Environmental Review
Prior to approval of any subdivision map or
site plan, all requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) must be
satisfied. The HSP will rely on and be consistent
with the environmental impact analysis
completed with the City’s General Plan EIR
(2006).
6. Substantial Conformance
Substantial conformance is a process
established to allow a limited degree of
flexibility for property owners, applicants, and
the City in the implementation of the HSP.
Through this process, minor modifications
may be made to certain technical components
of the HSP. Substantial Conformance may
include, but is not limited to, modifications to
infrastructure improvements, public service
and facility improvements, and similar issues.
The Substantial Conformance process shall
not be used to modify development regulations,
basic design concepts, or to exceed the
maximum density outlined in Section II .
Substantial Conformance requests shall be
reviewed by the Community Development
Department or their designee.
D. Amendment Process
Amendments to the HSP may be submitted to
the City of Newman which exceed or modify
the scope and intent of the Substantial
Conformance process. HSP Amendments are
governed by Section 65500 of the California
Government Code.
The following process must be followed in
reviewing proposed HSP Amendments:
1. Amendment Details
Proposals to amend the HSP must be
accompanied by detailed information to
document the requested change. This
information should include revised HSP
text and a revised Land Use Diagram, where
relevant, depicting the requested Amendment.
The applicant should indicate the economic,
social, or technical issues which generate
the need to amend the HSP. Amendments
shall be consistent with the City’s General
Plan and General Plan EIR; and if determined
inconsistent, either the amendment will need
to be revised and/or a general plan amendment
would be required.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
4 4-7
Minor Amendments
Minor modification(s) or amendment(s) are
allowed through an administrative review
process, so long as those minor adjustments
are consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of the HSP, and in substantial
conformance with:
• The Guiding Principles of the HSP (Section I);
• The Comprehensive Goals and Policies
(Section II);
• The City of Newman General Plan;
• The City of Newman Northwest Newman
Master Plan; and
• The City of Newman Downtown Revitalization
Plan.
Major Amendments
Any major modification(s) or amendment(s) to
the HSP that requires an application for, and
processing of, a HSP Amendment, subject to
CEQA (consistent with City’s General Plan EIR
document) and conditioned upon approval by
the Newman City Council.
Examples of major amendments include:
• Expanding the boundary of the Highway
Corridor; and/or
• An increase in the overall development density.
2. Submittal of Supplemental
Studies
The Community Development Department
shall determine if a proposal to amend the
HSP shall be required to provide studies which
analyze and address the Amendment’s effects,
compared to the adopted HSP and EIR, on the
following issues:
1. Conformance with HSP Guiding Principles
in Section I of the HSP.
2. Compatibility with any approved
development which will be affected by the
HSP Amendment.
3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Goals
and Policies presented in Section II of the
HSP.
4. Compatibility with existing and planned
land uses surrounding the proposed HSP
Amendment, as indicated by the adopted
HSP.
5. On-site and off-site visual impacts.
6. Traffic impacts.
7. Public Utilities, documented in Section II
of this HSP, as well as the adopted Citywide
Services Master Plan.
3. Supplemental
Environmental Analysis
The applicant must provide an analysis of the
Amendment’s impacts relative to the adopted
environmental document. Depending on the
nature of the Amendment, supplemental
environmental analysis may be necessary,
according to the California Environmental
Quality Act (Section 15162).
4. City Staff Analysis
City staff will review the submitted material
and provide a staff report for presentation
to the City Council. Staff may also request
further clarification of the technical studies,
if necessary. The staff report will analyze
whether the proposed Major HSP Amendment
is consistent with the General Plan and whether
the need to amend the HSP can be supported
by the conclusions of the supplemental
studies/ information.
5. Public Hearings
The City Council shall hold Public Hearings on
Major HSP Amendments, in accordance with
Section 65453 of the State Government Code.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Implementation and Phasing
This page intentionally left blank
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND
CORRIDOR CONCEPT PLAN
APPENDIX A
A-2
A
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Introduction
Study Area Overview
Vehicular Traffic Volumes
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-3
A
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Future Traffic Volumes
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-4
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Existing Corridor Conditions
Stuhr Road to Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway
Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway to Yolo Street
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-5
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-6
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Inyo Avenue to Nob Hill Foods Shopping Center
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-7
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Nob Hill Foods Shopping Center to the Stanislaus/Merced County Line Transit Operations
Stanislaus Regional Transit (StaRT)
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-8
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Dial-A-Ride
ADA Paratransit Service
Pedestrian Facilities
Bicycle Network
• Class I Multi-Use Path
• Class II Bike Lane
• Class III Bike Route
• Class IV Bikeway
Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-9
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Crosswalk Facilities and Warrants
•
•
•
Collision Analysis
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-10
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Study Intersections
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-11
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Intersection Level of Service Operations
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-12
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Key Issues and Considerations
Corridor-wide issues
•
•
•
•
Key Issues by Corridor Segment
North of Yolo Street
•
•
•
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-13
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
•
•
•
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue – Downtown Core
•
•
•
•
Inyo Avenue to City/County Line
•
•
•
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-14
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Best Practices Toolbox
Buffered Bike Lanes
•
•
•
High Visibility Bike Lane Striping
•
•
•
Narrow Lanes
•
•
•
Multi-use Path
•
•
•
Separated Bike Lanes (Cycle Track)
•
•
•
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
•
•
•
Curb Extension
•
•
•
HAWK Signal
•
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-15
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
•
Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing
•
•
•
Pedestrian Crossing Warrants
Alternatives
Stuhr Road to Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway
•
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-16
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway to Yolo Street
•
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
•
Inyo Avenue to City/County line
•
•
Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-17
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
•
•
•
•
•
Caltrans Comments
•
•
•
Preferred Plan
Stuhr Road to Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway
•
•
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-18
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
Jensen Road-Sherman Parkway to Yolo Street
•
•
•
•
•
Yolo Street to Inyo Avenue
•
•
•
South of Inyo Avenue
•
•
•
Implementation Issues and Next Steps
•
•
•
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-19
AA
City of Newman – Traffic Analysis for the Highway 33 Specific Plan Update November 8, 2021
•
•
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-20
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Stuhr Rd City: Newman Project ID:
Control: AWSC Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 11 39 39 0 1 22 0 0 1 5 9 0 8 6 1 0 142 679
7:15 AM 9 50 28 0 1 26 0 0 0 5 4 0 19 7 0 0 149 673
7:30 AM 13 68 38 0 0 35 0 0 2 4 10 0 30 5 0 0 205 656
7:45 AM 4 47 34 0 1 42 0 0 5 8 10 0 26 6 0 0 183 559
8:00 AM 9 32 22 0 0 41 1 0 1 0 6 0 20 3 1 0 136 503
8:15 AM 7 34 36 0 0 27 1 0 0 4 5 0 11 4 3 0 132 367
8:30 AM 8 36 22 0 0 20 1 0 0 3 8 0 7 3 0 0 108 235
8:45 AM 15 31 22 0 0 24 0 0 0 6 7 0 15 7 0 0 127 127
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 76 337 241 0 3 237 3 0 9 35 59 0 136 41 5 0 1182 APPROACH %'s : 11.62% 51.53% 36.85% 0.00% 1.23% 97.53% 1.23% 0.00% 8.74% 33.98% 57.28% 0.00% 74.73% 22.53% 2.75% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:00 AM 12:00 AM 37 44 07:30 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 37 204 139 0 3 125 0 0 8 22 33 0 83 24 1 0 679 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.712 0.750 0.891 0.000 0.750 0.744 0.000 0.000 0.400 0.688 0.825 0.000 0.692 0.857 0.250 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 4:00 PM 7 36 24 0 2 50 0 0 0 3 8 0 28 4 2 0 164 685
4:15 PM 3 43 28 0 1 46 0 0 0 2 15 0 28 4 0 0 170 701
4:30 PM 11 45 21 0 0 50 0 0 0 6 13 0 23 2 0 0 171 688
4:45 PM 7 37 27 0 0 58 0 0 1 8 8 0 31 2 1 0 180 708
5:00 PM 2 45 28 0 1 54 0 0 1 3 21 0 22 3 0 0 180 692
5:15 PM 5 36 14 0 0 45 1 0 0 6 16 0 29 5 0 0 157 512
5:30 PM 4 37 17 0 0 61 1 0 0 3 18 0 44 6 0 0 191 355
5:45 PM 5 30 12 0 1 49 1 0 0 4 17 0 40 5 0 0 164 164
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 44 309 171 0 5 413 3 0 2 35 116 0 245 31 3 0 1377 APPROACH %'s : 8.40% 58.97% 32.63% 0.00% 1.19% 98.10% 0.71% 0.00% 1.31% 22.88% 75.82% 0.00% 87.81% 11.11% 1.08% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 289 296 05:30 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 18 155 86 0 1 218 2 0 2 20 63 0 126 16 1 0 708 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.643 0.861 0.768 0.000 0.250 0.893 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.000 0.716 0.667 0.250 0.000 2020 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 42 233 159 0 3 143 0 0 9 25 38 0 95 27 1 0 776
PM 21 177 98 0 1 249 2 0 2 23 72 0 144 18 1 0 810
296 253 97 164
07:00 AM - 08:00 AM
5/10/2011
Total SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
STUHR RD.
Eastbound
STUHR RD.
Westbound
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.828 0.798 0.744 0.685 0.771
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.927 0.863 0.891 0.850 0.715
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-21
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Sherman Pkwy City: Newman Project ID:
Control: TWSC Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 60 6 0 8 35 4 0 3 1 0 0 8 3 28 0 156 839
7:15 AM 1 60 6 0 2 44 5 0 1 3 1 0 15 6 23 0 167 854
7:30 AM 0 90 9 0 6 54 16 0 3 2 1 0 20 36 25 0 262 836
7:45 AM 1 63 26 0 7 57 14 0 12 7 4 0 15 30 18 0 254 701 8:00 AM 1 56 12 0 6 62 3 0 3 6 2 0 5 4 11 0 171 571
8:15 AM 0 63 9 0 10 31 4 0 4 2 3 0 4 0 19 0 149 400
8:30 AM 0 51 6 0 3 38 0 0 2 1 1 0 7 1 17 0 127 251
8:45 AM 1 52 0 0 8 37 1 0 3 1 2 0 3 3 13 0 124 124
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 4 495 74 0 50 358 47 0 31 23 14 0 77 83 154 0 1410 APPROACH %'s : 0.70% 86.39% 12.91% 0.00% 10.99% 78.68% 10.33% 0.00% 45.59% 33.82% 20.59% 0.00% 24.52% 26.43% 49.04% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:15 AM 38 37 44 07:30 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 3 269 53 0 21 217 38 0 19 18 8 0 55 76 77 0 854 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.747 0.510 0.000 0.750 0.875 0.594 0.000 0.396 0.643 0.500 0.000 0.688 0.528 0.770 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 4:00 PM 0 85 16 0 30 129 4 0 6 3 2 0 8 2 19 0 304 932
4:15 PM 0 70 12 0 24 101 3 0 2 2 0 0 6 6 9 0 235 821
4:30 PM 1 64 17 0 19 61 2 0 5 4 1 0 4 4 8 0 190 799
4:45 PM 3 44 13 0 27 83 7 0 8 2 0 0 6 2 8 0 203 782
5:00 PM 2 47 9 0 27 80 5 0 2 6 4 0 4 4 3 0 193 767
5:15 PM 0 57 6 0 21 85 5 0 3 10 1 0 9 8 8 0 213 574
5:30 PM 2 50 11 0 21 66 3 0 6 0 1 0 8 2 3 0 173 361
5:45 PM 2 46 13 0 26 75 6 0 1 4 1 0 5 3 6 0 188 188
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 10 463 97 0 195 680 35 0 33 31 10 0 50 31 64 0 1699 APPROACH %'s : 1.75% 81.23% 17.02% 0.00% 21.43% 74.73% 3.85% 0.00% 44.59% 41.89% 13.51% 0.00% 34.48% 21.38% 44.14% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 289 296 04:00 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 4 263 58 0 100 374 16 0 21 11 3 0 24 14 44 0 932 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.333 0.774 0.853 0.000 0.833 0.725 0.571 0.000 0.656 0.688 0.375 0.000 0.750 0.583 0.579 0.000 2020 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 3 308 61 0 24 248 43 0 22 21 9 0 63 87 88 0 976
PM 5 301 66 0 114 428 18 0 24 13 3 0 27 16 50 0 1066
372 560 40 94
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
5/10/2011
Total SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
JENSEN RD.
Eastbound
SHERMAN PKWY.
Westbound
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.815 0.821 0.885 0.489 0.642
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.766 0.804 0.752 0.795 0.707
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-22
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Yolo St City: Newman Project ID:
Control: TWSC Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 9 51 0 0 0 30 15 0 15 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 131 800
7:15 AM 24 55 0 0 0 36 16 0 16 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 158 854
7:30 AM 55 83 0 0 1 44 30 0 23 0 14 00000 250 827
7:45 AM 55 65 0 0 0 54 28 0 28 2 28 0 1 0 0 0 261 686
8:00 AM 7 61 1 0 0 65 6 0 20 2 20 0 1 1 1 0 185 544
8:15 AM 2 66 0 0 0 42 5 0 8 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 131 359
8:30 AM 3 48 3 0 1 37 5 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 109 228
8:45 AM 7 50 1 0 0 40 6 0 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 119 119
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 162 479 5 0 2 348 111 0 124 4 99 0 6 1 3 0 1344 APPROACH %'s : 25.08% 74.15% 0.77% 0.00% 0.43% 75.49% 24.08% 0.00% 54.63% 1.76% 43.61% 0.00% 60.00% 10.00% 30.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:15 AM 38 37 44 07:45 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 141 264 1 0 1 199 80 0 87 4 72 0 3 1 1 0 854 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.641 0.795 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.765 0.667 0.000 0.777 0.500 0.643 0.000 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 4:00 PM 7 54 3 0 0 59 8 0 8 0 14 0 4 0 1 0 158 744
4:15 PM 10 57 0 0 3 67 11 0 7 1 19 0 0 0 1 0 176 740
4:30 PM 13 68 0 0 0 69 15 0 12 0 11 0 0 0 4 0 192 774
4:45 PM 18 72 0 0 1 84 11 0 14 1 15 0 0 1 1 0 218 780
5:00 PM 9 50 0 0 1 70 4 0 7 0 8 0 1 1 3 0 154 764
5:15 PM 10 77 0 0 1 74 21 0 11 0 13 0 3 0 0 0 210 610
5:30 PM 19 53 0 0 2 91 12 0 7 0 12 0 2 0 0 0 198 400
5:45 PM 21 50 0 0 2 83 24 0 13 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 202 202
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 107 481 3 0 10 597 106 0 79 2 100 0 10 2 11 0 1508 APPROACH %'s : 18.10% 81.39% 0.51% 0.00% 1.40% 83.73% 14.87% 0.00% 43.65% 1.10% 55.25% 0.00% 43.48% 8.70% 47.83% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 289 296 04:45 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 56 252 0 0 5 319 48 0 39 1 48 0 6 2 4 0 780 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.737 0.818 0.000 0.000 0.625 0.876 0.571 0.000 0.696 0.250 0.800 0.000 0.500 0.500 0.333 0.000 2020 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 161 302 1 0 1 228 91 0 99 5 82 0 3 1 1 0 976
PM 64 288 0 0 6 365 55 0 45 1 55 0 7 2 5 0 892
352 425 101 14
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
5/10/2011
Total SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
YOLO ST.
Eastbound
YOLO ST.
Westbound
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.818 0.736 0.854 0.703 0.417
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.894 0.856 0.886 0.733 0.600
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-23
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Kern St.
City: Newman Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 44 10 0 3 38 0 0 6 3 1 0 13 4 11 0 134 1030
7:15 AM 4 38 10 0 6 39 2 0 5 3 1 0 21 11 30 0 170 1138
7:30 AM 1 89 16 0 11 48 4 0 4 20 5 0 38 41 71 0 348 1144 7:45 AM 6 74 34 0 34 58 3 0 8 39 5 0 32 31 54 0 378 944 8:00 AM 0 59 30 0 15 71 0 0 4 12 3 0 16 15 17 0 242 746 8:15 AM 1 54 16 0 6 36 4 0 8 7 5 0 19 14 6 0 176 504
8:30 AM 0 45 10 0 8 38 2 0 4 10 1 0 17 6 7 0 148 328
8:45 AM 1 48 8 0 11 42 4 0 7 9 4 0 22 16 8 0 180 180
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 14 451 134 0 94 370 19 0 46 103 25 0 178 138 204 0 1776 APPROACH %'s : 2.34% 75.29% 22.37% 0.00% 19.46% 76.60% 3.93% 0.00% 26.44% 59.20% 14.37% 0.00% 34.23% 26.54% 39.23% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 37 44 07:45 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 8 276 96 0 66 213 11 0 24 78 18 0 105 101 148 0 1144 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.333 0.775 0.706 0.000 0.485 0.750 0.688 0.000 0.750 0.500 0.900 0.000 0.691 0.616 0.521 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 4:00 PM 2 48 10 0 10 73 6 0 5 10 4 0 27 8 14 0 217 928
4:15 PM 7 54 23 0 10 61 4 0 9 15 11 0 17 12 11 0 234 949 4:30 PM 2 61 38 0 17 70 5 0 13 13 3 0 16 17 15 0 270 932 4:45 PM 0 49 27 0 12 59 7 0 2 3 3 0 21 12 12 0 207 940
5:00 PM 3 72 27 0 18 60 4 0 5 18 2 0 14 8 7 0 238 930
5:15 PM 1 42 34 0 8 62 6 0 5 16 1 0 23 11 8 0 217 692
5:30 PM 2 56 31 0 12 99 4 0 4 12 5 0 32 12 9 0 278 475
5:45 PM 5 46 23 0 11 48 7 0 3 5 3 0 27 12 7 0 197 197
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 22 428 213 0 98 532 43 0 46 92 32 0 177 92 83 0 1858 APPROACH %'s : 3.32% 64.56% 32.13% 0.00% 14.56% 79.05% 6.39% 0.00% 27.06% 54.12% 18.82% 0.00% 50.28% 26.14% 23.58% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:15 PM 290 289 296 04:30 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 12 236 115 0 57 250 20 0 29 49 19 0 68 49 45 0 949 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.429 0.819 0.757 0.000 0.792 0.893 0.714 0.000 0.558 0.681 0.432 0.000 0.810 0.721 0.750 0.000 2020 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 9 316 110 0 75 244 13 0 27 89 21 0 120 115 169 0 1308 PM 14 270 131 0 65 286 23 0 33 56 22 0 78 56 51 0 1085
415 374 111 185
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
5/10/2011
Total SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
KERN ST.
Eastbound
KERN ST.
Westbound
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.757 0.833 0.763 0.577 0.590
04:15 PM - 05:15 PM
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.879 0.890 0.889 0.693 0.844
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-24
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Merced St.
City: Newman Project ID:
Control: Signaliized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 2 38 13 0 8 41 7 0 3 2 3 0 10 5 15 0 147 888
7:15 AM 1 41 18 0 11 54 5 0 6 5 2 0 15 8 15 0 181 972
7:30 AM 0 78 17 0 10 61 9 0 5 9 1 0 24 22 23 0 259 975
7:45 AM 1 80 30 0 12 69 13 0 4 20 3 0 29 19 21 0 301 881 8:00 AM 2 67 18 0 9 70 9 0 7 10 5 0 15 11 8 0 231 742
8:15 AM 2 55 11 0 8 55 8 0 9 4 4 0 9 9 10 0 184 511
8:30 AM 2 47 14 0 6 53 9 0 4 8 2 0 10 6 4 0 165 327
8:45 AM 1 41 16 0 7 47 6 0 3 6 1 0 17 4 13 0 162 162
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 11 447 137 0 71 450 66 0 41 64 21 0 129 84 109 0 1630 APPROACH %'s : 1.85% 75.13% 23.03% 0.00% 12.10% 76.66% 11.24% 0.00% 32.54% 50.79% 16.67% 0.00% 40.06% 26.09% 33.85% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:30 AM 39 37 44 07:45 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 5 280 76 0 39 255 39 0 25 43 13 0 77 61 62 0 975 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.625 0.875 0.633 0.000 0.813 0.911 0.750 0.000 0.694 0.538 0.650 0.000 0.664 0.693 0.674 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 4:00 PM 2 43 12 0 14 77 16 0 5 17 2 0 18 16 13 0 235 950 4:15 PM 1 63 18 0 13 75 9 0 4 13 3 0 21 9 13 0 242 944
4:30 PM 5 82 14 0 13 64 9 0 6 9 2 0 15 13 7 0 239 918
4:45 PM 2 58 10 0 18 64 10 0 4 9 5 0 23 14 17 0 234 916 5:00 PM 1 74 11 0 12 66 4 0 8 9 4 0 23 11 6 0 229 904
5:15 PM 2 59 23 0 13 62 4 0 4 14 2 0 13 9 11 0 216 675
5:30 PM 2 58 17 0 19 80 14 0 3 8 3 0 23 5 5 0 237 459
5:45 PM 0 64 17 0 6 66 12 0 6 8 2 0 15 13 13 0 222 222
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 15 501 122 0 108 554 78 0 40 87 23 0 151 90 85 0 1854 APPROACH %'s : 2.35% 78.53% 19.12% 0.00% 14.59% 74.86% 10.54% 0.00% 26.67% 58.00% 15.33% 0.00% 46.32% 27.61% 26.07% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 289 296 04:15 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 10 246 54 0 58 280 44 0 19 48 12 0 77 52 50 0 950 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.750 0.750 0.000 0.806 0.909 0.688 0.000 0.792 0.706 0.600 0.000 0.837 0.813 0.735 0.000 2020 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 6 320 87 0 45 292 45 0 29 49 15 0 88 70 71 0 1115
PM 11 281 62 0 66 320 50 0 22 55 14 0 88 59 57 0 1086
354 437 90 205
EASTBOUND
5/10/2011
MERCED ST.
Westbound
NORTHBOUND
MERCED ST.
Eastbound
0.725
WESTBOUND
SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
0.886 0.750
EASTBOUND
PM
AM
07:30 AM - 08:30 AM
NORTHBOUND
0.813 0.810
Total
0.981 0.823
WESTBOUND
0.829
SOUTHBOUND
0.767 0.893
04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
SOUTHBOUND
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-25
AA
National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count Location: SR 33/Inyo Ave.
City: Newman Project ID:
Control: TWSC Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 7:00 AM 4 44 8 0 2 28 3 0 0 2 1 0 16 4 7 0 119 714
7:15 AM 3 45 30 0 4 38 3 0 3 4 2 0 22 2 7 1 164 772
7:30 AM 6 51 57 0 5 48 5 0 0 6 3 0 21 7 3 0 212 732
7:45 AM 11 55 33 0 4 59 5 0 7 4 1 1 20 9 9 1 219 666
8:00 AM 6 50 11 0 5 60 2 0 2 5 2 0 22 4 8 0 177 606
8:15 AM 2 56 8 1 8 27 4 0 4 1 1 0 8 1 3 0 124 600
8:30 AM 5 47 9 0 5 50 3 1 0 0 2 0 16 4 4 0 146 628
8:45 AM 6 49 14 0 5 55 3 1 2 2 3 0 10 3 5 1 159 625
9:00 AM 4 74 17 0 5 41 4 0 2 4 3 0 10 4 2 1 171 629
9:15 AM 5 46 17 0 5 41 4 0 2 4 3 0 19 2 3 1 152 616
9:30 AM 6 49 6 0 6 45 3 0 1 1 5 0 16 0 4 1 143 604
9:45 AM 2 67 14 1 3 44 0 0 1 3 7 1 14 2 4 0 163 596
10:00 AM 3 53 11 0 4 50 5 4 3 0 6 0 13 3 2 1 158 573
10:15 AM 4 53 8 0 2 40 5 0 4 0 4 0 11 2 6 1 140 415
10:30 AM 7 43 14 0 3 37 2 0 5 2 2 0 15 0 1 4 135 275
10:45 AM 7 49 7 0 4 40 3 0 2 3 6 0 11 4 3 1 140 140
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 81 831 264 2 70 703 54 6 38 41 51 2 244 51 71 13 2522 APPROACH %'s : 6.88% 70.54% 22.41% 0.17% 8.40% 84.39% 6.48% 0.72% 28.79% 31.06% 38.64% 1.52% 64.38% 13.46% 18.73% 3.43% PEAK HR : 07:15 AM 12:00 AM 37 52 07:45 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 26 201 131 0 18 205 15 0 12 19 8 1 85 22 27 2 772 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.591 0.914 0.575 0.000 0.900 0.854 0.750 0.000 0.429 0.792 0.667 0.250 0.966 0.611 0.750 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000000000000000
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
11:00 AM 4 66 10 0 3 47 2 0 2 2 8 0 15 1 5 0 165 680
11:15 AM 3 61 14 0 4 54 4 0 3 3 4 0 17 5 5 0 177 737
11:30 AM 6 48 14 0 4 50 3 0 2 0 5 0 19 5 4 0 160 724
11:45 AM 5 62 15 0 3 50 3 0 6 4 4 0 15 3 8 0 178 774
12:00 PM 4 79 31 0 6 57 5 0 9 4 12 0 9 2 4 0 222 801
12:15 PM 6 57 14 0 6 43 6 0 9 2 4 0 12 2 3 0 164 762
12:30 PM 6 79 15 0 3 63 2 0 7 3 5 0 17 2 8 0 210 789
12:45 PM 5 63 17 0 6 70 12 0 4 2 0 0 14 4 8 0 205 780
1:00 PM 6 64 17 0 8 54 4 0 7 1 4 0 11 1 6 0 183 751
1:15 PM 2 68 18 0 5 51 4 0 6 6 1 4 15 0 7 4 191 748
1:30 PM 3 73 21 0 4 51 8 0 4 2 5 0 14 4 12 0 201 759
1:45 PM 3 49 20 0 6 53 7 0 6 4 4 0 18 2 4 0 176 771
2:00 PM 5 63 18 0 7 44 3 0 5 3 6 0 11 3 10 2 180 806
2:15 PM 2 69 23 0 11 54 9 0 3 2 1 0 15 2 10 1 202 626
2:30 PM 0 61 36 0 11 65 1 0 6 5 9 0 8 3 5 3 213 424
2:45 PM 3 73 37 0 5 59 2 0 2 3 3 0 15 1 6 2 211 211
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 63 1035 320 0 92 865 75 0 81 46 75 4 225 40 105 12 3038 APPROACH %'s : 4.44% 72.99% 22.57% 0.00% 8.91% 83.82% 7.27% 0.00% 39.32% 22.33% 36.41% 1.94% 58.90% 10.47% 27.49% 3.14% PEAK HR : 02:00 PM 12:00 AM 161 176 02:30 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 10 266 114 0 34 222 15 0 16 13 19 0 49 9 31 8 806 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.911 0.770 0.000 0.773 0.854 0.417 0.000 0.667 0.650 0.528 0.000 0.817 0.750 0.775 0.667 0000000000000000
NL NT NR PED SL ST SR PED EL ET ER PED WL WT WR PED TOTAL 3:00 PM 7 72 28 0 7 56 8 0 0 0 5 0 24 4 6 0 217 909
3:15 PM 4 80 27 0 6 76 5 0 8 0 9 0 11 5 4 1 236 900
3:30 PM 5 72 22 0 9 65 6 0 14 8 9 1 23 2 13 4 253 881
3:45 PM 4 57 26 0 5 76 4 1 4 0 5 0 10 3 7 1 203 833
4:00 PM 2 55 20 0 13 62 5 0 9 5 7 0 17 4 9 0 208 842
4:15 PM 5 73 29 0 8 60 2 0 6 3 6 0 10 9 6 0 217 890
4:30 PM 7 47 27 0 4 68 2 0 11 4 7 0 14 6 7 1 205 910
4:45 PM 3 74 26 1 3 53 7 0 5 6 7 0 15 3 7 2 212 923
5:00 PM 4 91 63 0 3 52 2 0 6 2 2 0 22 3 6 0 256 964
5:15 PM 3 80 33 0 7 68 4 0 5 3 5 0 19 3 5 2 237 909
5:30 PM 7 73 32 0 3 54 1 1 6 7 5 0 21 2 6 0 218 888
5:45 PM 5 77 31 0 12 80 3 0 0 2 6 0 22 4 11 0 253 857
6:00 PM 3 56 38 1 9 53 1 0 4 0 5 0 21 4 5 1 201 826
6:15 PM 2 66 36 0 7 58 3 0 7 5 2 0 15 2 13 0 216 625
6:30 PM 2 67 24 1 7 51 4 0 4 1 3 0 15 1 7 0 187 409
6:45 PM 3 70 30 0 15 59 3 0 3 2 2 0 18 6 11 0 222 222
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 66 1110 492 3 118 991 60 2 92 48 85 1 277 61 123 12 3541 APPROACH %'s : 3.95% 66.43% 29.44% 0.18% 10.08% 84.63% 5.12% 0.17% 40.71% 21.24% 37.61% 0.44% 58.56% 12.90% 26.00% 2.54% PEAK HR : 05:00 PM 293 258 300 05:00 PM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 19 321 159 0 25 254 10 1 17 14 18 0 84 12 28 2 964 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.679 0.882 0.631 0.000 0.521 0.794 0.625 0.250 0.708 0.500 0.750 0.000 0.955 0.750 0.636 0.250 2021 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL AM 28 217 141 0 19 221 16 0 13 20 9 1 92 24 29 2 832
NOON 11 287 123 0 37 239 16 0 17 14 20 0 53 10 33 9 868 PM 20 346 171 0 27 274 11 1 18 15 19 0 90 13 30 2 1039
538 311 53 134
0.941 0.790 0.763 0.681 0.851
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
02:00 PM - 03:00 PM
0.946 0.863 0.880 0.600 0.866
0.881 0.785 0.875 0.769 0.872
NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
8/18/2015
Total SR 33
Northbound
SR 33
Southbound
INYO AVE.
Eastbound
INYO AVE.
Westbound
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-26
AA
Location:
Date of Count:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Collisions: 6
Number of Injuries: 6
Number of Fatalities: 0
Start Date:
End Date:
Number of Years: 5
Highway Type: Conventional 2 lanes or less
Area:
Design Speed: ≤45
Segment Length: 1.0 miles
Direction:
6x
x 365 x 0.95 x 5
Study Segment 0.44 c/mvm
Statewide Average* 2.09 c/mvm
Notes
c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles
Location:
Date of Count:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Collisions:
Number of Injuries: 7
Number of Fatalities: 0
Start Date:
End Date:
Number of Years: 5
Highway Type: Conventional 3 lanes
Area:
Segment Length: 0.5 miles
Direction:
7x
x 365 x 0.45 x 5
Study Segment 0.97 c/mvm
Statewide Average* 1.41 c/mvm
Notes
c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles
Number of Collisions x 1 Million
ADT = average daily traffic volume
ADT x Days per Year x Segment Length x Number of Years
8,800
* 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans Number of Collisions x 1 Million
ADT x Days per Year x Segment Length x Number of Years
7,800
39.2%
100.0%
Newman Highway 33 Specific Plan
North/South
December 31, 2019
1,000,000
8,800
7 1.0%
North/South
Saturday, January 0, 1900
January 1, 2015
Yolo Street - Merced Street
Stuhr Road - Yolo Street
Tuesday, July 11, 1905
Fatality Rate Injury Rate
ADT = average daily traffic volume
0.7%
Urban
Injury Rate
1,000,000
Fatality Rate
* 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans Collision Rate =
December 31, 2019
Urban
January 1, 2015
Collision Rate
Collision Rate
Roadway Segment Collision Rate Worksheet
7,800
0.0%
0.0% 100.0%
37.9%
Collision Rate =
Collision Rate =
Collision Rate =
W-Trans
2/4/2021
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-27
AA
Location:
Date of Count:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Collisions: 4
Number of Injuries: 4
Number of Fatalities: 0
Start Date:
End Date:
Number of Years: 5
Highway Type: Conventional 3 lanes
Area:
Segment Length: 0.2 miles
Direction:
4x
x 365 x 0.19 x 5
Study Segment 1.28 c/mvm
Statewide Average* 1.41 c/mvm
Notes
c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles
Location:
Date of Count:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Collisions:
Number of Injuries: 0
Number of Fatalities: 0
Start Date:
End Date:
Number of Years: 0
Highway Type: Conventional 3 lanes
Area:
Segment Length: 0.0 miles
Direction:
0x
x 365 x 0 x 0
Study Segment 0.00 c/mvm
Statewide Average* 1.41 c/mvm
Notes
c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles
Merced Street - Inyo Avenue
9,000
January 1, 2015
Urban
Saturday, January 0, 1900
0 Roadway Segment Collision Rate Worksheet
December 31, 2019
Newman Highway 33 Specific Plan
Saturday, January 0, 1900
0 Fatality Rate
North/South
0 0.0% 100.0%
0.7% 37.9%
Injury Rate
Number of Collisions x 1 Million
ADT x Days per Year x Segment Length x Number of Years
9,000
Collision Rate =
0.0%
Collision Rate
1,000,000
East/West
Number of Collisions x 1 Million
ADT x Days per Year x Segment Length x Number of Years
0 January 0, 1900
ADT = average daily traffic volume
* 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans 1,000,000
Collision Rate
Collision Rate =
Collision Rate =
Collision Rate =
* 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans January 0, 1900
Urban
ADT = average daily traffic volume
0.7% 37.9%
Fatality Rate Injury Rate
0.0%
W-Trans
2/4/2021
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-28
AA
Location:
Date of Count:
Average Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Collisions: 0
Number of Injuries: 0
Number of Fatalities: 0
Start Date:
End Date:
Number of Years: 0
Highway Type: Conventional 2 lanes or less
Area:
Design Speed: ≤45
Segment Length: 0.0 miles
0x
x 365 x 0 x 0
Study Segment 0.00 c/mvm
Statewide Average* 2.09 c/mvm
Notes
c/mvm = collisions per million vehicle miles
Roadway Segment Collision Rate Worksheet
Newman Highway 33 Specific Plan
0 Saturday, January 0, 1900
0 January 0, 1900
January 0, 1900
Urban
0.0% 0.0%
1.0% 39.2%
ADT = average daily traffic volume
* 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, Caltrans 1,000,000
Collision Rate Fatality Rate Injury Rate
Number of Collisions x 1 Million
ADT x Days per Year x Segment Length x Number of Years
0 Collision Rate =
Collision Rate =
W-Trans
2/4/2021
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-29
AA
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing AM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 2 AM Peak V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
WB Left 0.224 16.3 C HCM 6th
Edition 6 SR33/Inyo Avenue Two-way stop
NB Left 0.363 22.8 C HCM 6th
Edition 5 SR33/Merced Street Signalized
NB Left 0.515 26.8 C HCM 6th
Edition 4 SR33/Kern Street Signalized
WB Left 0.016 24.0 C HCM 6th
Edition 3 SR33/Yolo Street Two-way stop
EB Left 0.096 22.9 C HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop SR33/Sherman ParkwayJenson Road 2 NB Thru 0.540 11.2 B HCM 6th
Edition 1 SR33/Stuhr Road All-way stop
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-30
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.540
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 1: SR33/Stuhr Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 45.00 40.00 40.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 42 233 159 3 143 90 25 38 95 27 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 11 58 40 1 36 20 6 10 24 7 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 42 233 159 3 143 90 25 38 95 27 1 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 42 233 159 3 143 90 25 38 95 27 1 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-31
AA
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 11.19
Approach LOS B A A A
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.60 9.28 8.83 9.87
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 82.09 18.91 8.71 17.43 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 3.28 0.76 0.35 0.70
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.54 0.20 0.10 0.19
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 804 719 688 646
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-32
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.096
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 22.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: SR33/Sherman Parkway-Jenson Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 425.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 10 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3 308 61 24 248 43 22 21 9 63 87 88 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 77 15 6 62 11 6 5 2 16 22 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 3 308 61 24 248 43 22 21 9 63 87 88 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 3 308 61 24 248 43 22 21 9 63 87 88 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-33
AA
Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 6.05
Approach LOS A A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.06 0.62 18.77 19.82
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.18 0.18 0.18 1.54 0.00 0.00 14.66 14.66 14.66 64.02 64.02 64.02 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.59 2.56 2.56 2.56 Movement LOS A A AA A CA C CB C C
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.84 0.00 0.00 8.09 0.00 0.00 22.94 17.31 11.95 22.09 21.42 16.62 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.24 0.13 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 1
Flared Lane No Yes
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-34
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.016
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 24.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 3: SR33/Yolo Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 161 302 11 228 91 99 5 82 3 1 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 40 76 00 57 23 25 1 21 1 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 161 302 11 228 91 99 5 82 3 1 1 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 161 302 11 228 91 99 5 82 3 1 1 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-35
AA
Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 4.68
Approach LOS A A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.89 0.02 16.72 20.67
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.14 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 43.68 43.68 43.68 1.63 1.63 1.63 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.07 0.07 0.07 Movement LOS A A AA A CA C CB C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.33 0.00 0.00 7.86 0.00 0.00 18.78 18.94 14.10 24.00 21.15 10.22 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.01 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 2 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-36
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.515
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 26.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: SR33/Kern Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 60.00 100.00 100.00 65.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 316 110 75 244 13 27 89 21 120 115 169 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 79 28 19 61 73 22 5 30 29 42 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 316 110 75 244 13 27 89 21 120 115 169 Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 316 110 75 244 13 27 89 21 120 115 169 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-37
AA
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 00 17 00 16 00 14 0
Walk [s] 0 7 00 7 00 7 00 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 9 29 0 9 29 0 9 30 0 12 33 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference LeadGreen
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 80
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-38
AA
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.61 223.47 79.68 104.21 29.75 90.21 120.72 244.90 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.46 8.94 3.19 4.17 1.19 3.61 4.83 9.80 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 6.45 129.98 44.27 57.89 16.53 50.12 67.07 145.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.26 5.20 1.77 2.32 0.66 2.00 2.68 5.83 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS E B D B D C D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 55.45 16.19 51.30 10.57 49.30 32.32 45.57 37.69 X, volume / capacity 0.46 0.53 0.80 0.28 0.58 0.45 0.81 0.87 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 16.15 2.50 14.07 0.78 10.89 1.29 9.92 7.25 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 39.31 13.68 37.23 9.79 38.41 31.02 35.65 30.44 c, Capacity [veh/h] 19 803 94 910 47 245 148 326
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 1610 1603 1668 1603 1628 1603 1523 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.26 0.05 0.15 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.19 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.01 0.50 0.06 0.55 0.03 0.15 0.09 0.21 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 1 40 5 44 2 12 7 17
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Lane Group L C L C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-39
AA
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 55.45 16.19 16.19 51.30 10.57 10.57 49.30 32.32 32.32 45.57 37.69 37.69 Movement LOS E B B D B B D C C D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 17.00 19.77 35.66 40.03
Approach LOS B B D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 26.77
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.515
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 29.76 29.76 29.76 29.76
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.244 2.254 2.008 2.117 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 625 625 650 725 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 18.91 18.91 18.23 16.26
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.119 2.949 2.551 2.915 Bicycle LOS C C B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-40
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.363
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 22.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: SR33/Merced Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 10 0 11 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6 320 87 45 292 45 29 49 15 88 70 71 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 80 22 11 73 11 7 12 4 22 18 18 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 6 320 87 45 292 45 29 49 15 88 70 71 Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 6 320 87 45 292 45 29 49 15 88 70 71 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-41
AA
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 17 00 19 00 18 00 19 0
Walk [s] 0 7 00 7 00 7 00 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 9 28 0 11 30 0 31 29 0 32 30 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference LeadGreen
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Semi-actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-42
AA
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 10.63 145.17 63.92 97.40 39.48 63.28 17.62 111.55 78.28 82.16 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.43 5.81 2.56 3.90 1.58 2.53 0.70 4.46 3.13 3.29 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 5.91 80.65 35.51 54.11 21.93 35.15 9.79 61.97 43.49 45.64 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.24 3.23 1.42 2.16 0.88 1.41 0.39 2.48 1.74 1.83 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS E A E A E E ED D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 74.91 7.23 68.17 5.52 61.55 58.34 48.44 57.47 46.58 48.91 X, volume / capacity 0.48 0.36 0.78 0.28 0.63 0.69 0.25 0.79 0.50 0.60 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 25.50 0.91 20.34 0.60 13.50 11.11 2.10 11.67 2.73 4.69 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 49.40 6.32 47.83 4.92 48.05 47.23 46.34 45.80 43.84 44.21 c, Capacity [veh/h] 13 1123 57 1184 46 71 61 111 140 119 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 1622 1603 1644 1603 1683 1431 1603 1683 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.00 0.25 0.03 0.20 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.01 0.69 0.04 0.72 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.08 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 1 69 4 72 3 4 74 8 8
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Lane Group L C L C L C LR C R
Lane Group Calculations
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-43
AA
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 74.91 7.23 7.23 68.17 5.52 5.52 61.55 58.34 48.44 57.47 46.58 48.91 Movement LOS E A A E A A E E D E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.21 12.90 57.74 51.48
Approach LOS A B E D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 22.81
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.363
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 39.61 39.61 39.61 39.61
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.251 2.249 2.197 2.253 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 480 520 500 520 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 28.88 27.38 28.13 27.38
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.083 3.031 2.631 2.779 Bicycle LOS C C B C
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-44
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.224
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 16.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: SR33/Inyo Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 90.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 125.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 11 0 00 0 10 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 28 217 141 19 221 16 13 20 9 92 24 29 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 54 35 5 55 34 5 2 23 6 7 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 28 217 141 19 221 16 13 20 9 92 24 29 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 28 217 141 19 221 16 13 20 9 92 24 29 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-45
AA
Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.70
Approach LOS A A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.56 0.57 13.93 14.64
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.61 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 7.77 7.77 7.77 21.17 7.50 7.50 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.85 0.30 0.30 Movement LOS A A AA A CA B CB B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.76 0.00 0.00 7.70 0.00 0.00 16.11 14.16 10.28 16.26 14.02 10.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.22 0.06 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-46
AA
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing AM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 2 AM Peak 829
Total
Volume
29 Right
24 Thru
92 Left
Westbound
9 Right
20 Thru
13 Left
Eastbound
16 Right
221
Thru
19 Left
Southbound
141
Right
217
Thru
28 Left
Northbound
6 SR33/Inyo Avenue
ID Intersection Name
1117
Total
Volume
71 Right
70 Thru
88 Left
Westbound
15 Right
49 Thru
29 Left
Eastbound
45 Right
292
Thru
45 Left
Southbound
87 Right
320
Thru
6 Left
Northbound
5 SR33/Merced Street
ID Intersection Name
1308
Total
Volume
169
Right
115
Thru
120
Left
Westbound
21 Right
89 Thru
27 Left
Eastbound
13 Right
244
Thru
75 Left
Southbound
110
Right
316
Thru
9 Left
Northbound
4 SR33/Kern Street
ID Intersection Name
975
Total
Volume
1 Right
1 Thru
3 Left
Westbound
82 Right
5 Thru
99 Left
Eastbound
91 Right
228
Thru
1 Left
Southbound
1 Right
302
Thru
161
Left
Northbound
3 SR33/Yolo Street
ID Intersection Name
977
Total
Volume
88 Right
87 Thru
63 Left
Westbound
9 Right
21 Thru
22 Left
Eastbound
43 Right
248
Thru
24 Left
Southbound
61 Right
308
Thru
3 Left
Northbound
SR33/Sherman ParkwayJenson Road 2
ID Intersection Name
775
Total
Volume
1 Right
27 Thru
95 Left
Westbound
38 Right
25 Thru
9 Left
Eastbound
0 Right
143
Thru
3 Left
Southbound
159
Right
233
Thru
42 Left
Northbound
1 SR33/Stuhr Road
ID Intersection Name
Version 7.0006
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-47
AA
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing AM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 2 AM Peak 1308
0 0
0 -
1308
Total
Volume
169
0 0
0 1.00
169
Right
115
0 0
0 1.00
115
Thru
120
0 0
0 1.00
120
Left
Westbound
21 0
0 0
1.00 21
Right
89 0
0 0
1.00 89
Thru
27 0
0 0
1.00 27
Left
Eastbound
13 0
0 0
1.00 13
Right
244
0 0
0 1.00
244
Thru
75 0
0 0
1.00 75
Left
Southbound
110
0 0
0 1.00
110
Right
316
0 0
0 1.00
316
Thru
9 0
0 0
1.00 9
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Kern
Street 4
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
975
0 0
0 -
975
Total
Volume
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Right
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Thru
3 0
0 0
1.00 3
Left
Westbound
82 0
0 0
1.00 82
Right
5 0
0 0
1.00 5
Thru
99 0
0 0
1.00 99
Left
Eastbound
91 0
0 0
1.00 91
Right
228
0 0
0 1.00
228
Thru
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Left
Southbound
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Right
302
0 0
0 1.00
302
Thru
161
0 0
0 1.00
161
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Yolo
Street 3
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
977
0 0
0 -
977
Total
Volume
88 0
0 0
1.00 88
Right
87 0
0 0
1.00 87
Thru
63 0
0 0
1.00 63
Left
Westbound
9 0
0 0
1.00 9
Right
21 0
0 0
1.00 21
Thru
22 0
0 0
1.00 22
Left
Eastbound
43 0
0 0
1.00 43
Right
248
0 0
0 1.00
248
Thru
24 0
0 0
1.00 24
Left
Southbound
61 0
0 0
1.00 61
Right
308
0 0
0 1.00
308
Thru
3 0
0 0
1.00 3
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Sherman
ParkwayJenson Road
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
775
0 0
0 -
775
Total
Volume
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Right
27 0
0 0
1.00 27
Thru
95 0
0 0
1.00 95
Left
Westbound
38 0
0 0
1.00 38
Right
25 0
0 0
1.00 25
Thru
9 0
0 0
1.00 9
Left
Eastbound
0 0
0 0
1.00 0
Right
143
0 0
0 1.00
143
Thru
3 0
0 0
1.00 3
Left
Southbound
159
0 0
0 1.00
159
Right
233
0 0
0 1.00
233
Thru
42 0
0 0
1.00 42
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Stuhr
Road 1
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 7.00-06
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-48
AA
829
0 0
0 -
829
Total
Volume
29 0
0 0
1.00 29
Right
24 0
0 0
1.00 24
Thru
92 0
0 0
1.00 92
Left
Westbound
9 0
0 0
1.00 9
Right
20 0
0 0
1.00 20
Thru
13 0
0 0
1.00 13
Left
Eastbound
16 0
0 0
1.00 16
Right
221
0 0
0 1.00
221
Thru
19 0
0 0
1.00 19
Left
Southbound
141
0 0
0 1.00
141
Right
217
0 0
0 1.00
217
Thru
28 0
0 0
1.00 28
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Inyo
Avenue 6
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1117
0 0
0 -
1117
Total
Volume
71 0
0 0
1.00 71
Right
70 0
0 0
1.00 70
Thru
88 0
0 0
1.00 88
Left
Westbound
15 0
0 0
1.00 15
Right
49 0
0 0
1.00 49
Thru
29 0
0 0
1.00 29
Left
Eastbound
45 0
0 0
1.00 45
Right
292
0 0
0 1.00
292
Thru
45 0
0 0
1.00 45
Left
Southbound
87 0
0 0
1.00 87
Right
320
0 0
0 1.00
320
Thru
6 0
0 0
1.00 6
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Merced
Street 5
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-49
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: SR33/Stuhr Road 24 9 3 2 1
23 9 3 2 1
22 13 4 4 2
21 13 4 4 2
20 17 6 5 3
19 43 15 12 7
18 48 16 14 8
17 87 29 25 14
16 152 51 43 25
15 156 53 44 26
14 156 53 44 26
13 169 57 48 28
12 187 63 53 31
11 195 66 55 32
10 195 66 55 32
9 208 70 59 35
8 260 88 74 43
7 273 92 77 45
6 295 99 84 49
5 330 111 93 55
4 347 117 98 58
3 408 137 116 68
2 417 140 118 69
1 434 146 123 72
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-50
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met No No
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 775 775 High Minor Volume Condition Met Yes No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 123 72 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:20 0:10 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 9.9 8.8 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 1 3 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 Hours
Met
24 2 12 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
23 2 12 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
22 2 17 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
21 2 17 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
20 2 23 2 8 No No No No No No No No No No
19 2 58 2 19 No No No No No No No No No No
18 2 64 2 22 No No No No No No No No No No
17 2 116 2 39 No No No No No No No No No No
16 2 203 2 68 No No No No No No No No No No
15 2 209 2 70 No No No No No No No No No No
14 2 209 2 70 No No No No No No No No No No
13 2 226 2 76 No No No No No No No No No No
12 2 250 2 84 No No No No No No No No No No
11 2 261 2 87 No No No No No No No No No No
10 2 261 2 87 No No No No No No No No No No
9 2 278 2 94 No No No No No No No No No No
8 2 348 2 117 No No No No No No No No No No
7 2 365 2 122 No No No No No No No No No No
6 2 394 2 133 No No No Yes No No No No No No
5 2 441 2 148 No No No Yes No No No No No No
4 2 464 2 156 No No No Yes No No No No No No
3 2 545 2 184 No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
2 2 557 2 187 No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
1 2 580 2 195 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-51
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: SR33/Sherman Parkway-Jenson Road 24 7 6 5 1
23 7 6 5 1
22 11 9 7 2
21 11 9 7 2
20 15 13 10 2
19 37 32 24 5
18 41 35 26 6
17 74 63 48 10
16 130 110 83 18
15 134 113 86 19
14 134 113 86 19
13 145 123 93 20
12 160 135 102 22
11 167 142 107 23
10 167 142 107 23
9 179 151 114 25
8 223 189 143 31
7 234 198 150 33
6 253 214 162 35
5 283 239 181 40
4 298 252 190 42
3 350 296 224 49
2 357 302 228 50
1 372 315 238 52
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour Yes
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume Yes
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-52
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 977 977 High Minor Volume Condition Met Yes No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 238 52 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 1:18 0:16 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 19.8 18.8 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
3 5 7 8 0 0 3 5 5 3 Hours
Met
24 3 13 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
23 3 13 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
22 3 20 2 9 No No No No No No No No No No
21 3 20 2 9 No No No No No No No No No No
20 3 28 2 12 No No No No No No No No No No
19 3 69 2 29 No No No No No No No No No No
18 3 76 2 32 No No No No No No No No No No
17 3 137 2 58 No No No No No No No No No No
16 3 240 2 101 No No No No No No No No No No
15 3 247 2 105 No No No No No No No No No No
14 3 247 2 105 No No No No No No No No No No
13 3 268 2 113 No No No No No No No No No No
12 3 295 2 124 No No No No No No No No No No
11 3 309 2 130 No No No No No No No No No No
10 3 309 2 130 No No No No No No No No No No
9 3 330 2 139 No No No No No No No No No No
8 3 412 2 174 No No No Yes No No No No No No
7 3 432 2 183 No No Yes Yes No No No No No No
6 3 467 2 197 No No Yes Yes No No No No No No
5 3 522 2 221 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No
4 3 550 2 232 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No
3 3 646 2 273 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
2 3 659 2 278 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
1 3 687 2 290 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-53
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 3: SR33/Yolo Street 24 9 6 0 4
23 9 6 0 4
22 14 10 0 6
21 14 10 0 6
20 19 13 0 7
19 46 32 1 19
18 51 35 1 20
17 93 64 1 37
16 162 112 2 65
15 167 115 2 67
14 167 115 2 67
13 181 125 2 73
12 200 138 2 80
11 209 144 2 84
10 209 144 2 84
9 223 154 2 89
8 278 192 3 112
7 292 202 3 117
6 316 218 3 126
5 353 243 4 141
4 371 256 4 149
3 436 301 5 175
2 445 307 5 179
1 464 320 5 186
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour Yes
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume Yes
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Yes
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-54
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 975 975 High Minor Volume Condition Met No Yes
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 5 186
Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:01 0:51 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 20.7 16.7 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
3 6 8 11 0 3 3 6 5 1 Hours
Met
24 4 15 2 4 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 15 2 4 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 24 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 24 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 32 2 7 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 78 2 20 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 86 2 21 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 157 2 38 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 274 2 67 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 282 2 69 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 282 2 69 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 306 2 75 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 338 2 82 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 353 2 86 No No No Yes No No No No No No
10 4 353 2 86 No No No Yes No No No No No No
9 4 377 2 91 No No No Yes No No No No No No
8 4 470 2 115 No No Yes Yes No No No No No No
7 4 494 2 120 No No Yes Yes No No No No No No
6 4 534 2 129 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
5 4 596 2 145 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No
4 4 627 2 153 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No
3 4 737 2 180 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
2 4 752 2 184 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
1 4 784 2 191 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-55
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 6: SR33/Inyo Avenue 24 8 5 3 1
23 8 5 3 1
22 12 8 4 1
21 12 8 4 1
20 15 10 6 2
19 39 26 15 4
18 42 28 16 5
17 77 51 29 8
16 135 90 51 15
15 139 92 52 15
14 139 92 52 15
13 151 100 57 16
12 166 110 62 18
11 174 115 65 19
10 174 115 65 19
9 185 123 70 20
8 232 154 87 25
7 243 161 91 26
6 262 174 99 29
5 293 195 110 32
4 309 205 116 34
3 363 241 136 39
2 371 246 139 40
1 386 256 145 42
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 100%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph No
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-56
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 829 829 High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 145 42 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:35 0:09 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 2 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 14.6 13.9 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 0 1 4 0 0 1 4 0 0 Hours
Met
24 5 13 3 4 No No No No No No No No No No
23 5 13 3 4 No No No No No No No No No No
22 5 20 3 5 No No No No No No No No No No
21 5 20 3 5 No No No No No No No No No No
20 5 25 3 8 No No No No No No No No No No
19 5 65 3 19 No No No No No No No No No No
18 5 70 3 21 No No No No No No No No No No
17 5 128 3 37 No No No No No No No No No No
16 5 225 3 66 No No No No No No No No No No
15 5 231 3 67 No No No No No No No No No No
14 5 231 3 67 No No No No No No No No No No
13 5 251 3 73 No No No No No No No No No No
12 5 276 3 80 No No No No No No No No No No
11 5 289 3 84 No No No No No No No No No No
10 5 289 3 84 No No No No No No No No No No
9 5 308 3 90 No No No No No No No No No No
8 5 386 3 112 No No No No No No No No No No
7 5 404 3 117 No No No No No No No No No No
6 5 436 3 128 No No No No No No No No No No
5 5 488 3 142 No No No No No No No No No No
4 5 514 3 150 No No No Yes No No No Yes No No
3 5 604 3 175 No No No Yes No No No Yes No No
2 5 617 3 179 No No No Yes No No No Yes No No
1 5 642 3 187 No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-57
AA
Study Intersections
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-58
AA
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-59
AA
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-60
AA
Traffic Conditions
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-61
AA
Network Statistics
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing AM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 2 AM Peak Network Height [mi] 1.7
Network Width [mi] 0.6
Total Link Length [mi] 5.4
Number of Routes 0
Number of Paths 0
Number of Gates 0
Number of Zones 0
Number of Links 38
- Unknown 0
- All-way stop 1
- Two-way stop 3
- Roundabout 0
- Signalized 2
Number of Intersections 6
Version 7.00-06
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-62
AA
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing PM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 3 PM Peak V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
WB Left 0.294 21.6 C HCM 6th
Edition 6 SR33/Inyo Avenue Two-way stop
NB Left 0.339 21.7 C HCM 6th
Edition 5 SR33/Merced Street Signalized
NB Left 0.390 24.9 C HCM 6th
Edition 4 SR33/Kern Street Signalized
WB Left 0.029 20.2 C HCM 6th
Edition 3 SR33/Yolo Street Two-way stop
EB Left 0.143 31.4 D HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop SR33/Sherman ParkwayJenson Road 2 NB Thru 0.399 10.7 B HCM 6th
Edition 1 SR33/Stuhr Road All-way stop
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Version 7.00-06
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-63
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.399
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 1: SR33/Stuhr Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 45.00 40.00 40.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 177 98 1 249 22 23 72 144 18 1 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 44 25 0 62 11 6 18 36 5 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 177 98 1 249 22 23 72 144 18 1 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 21 177 98 1 249 22 23 72 144 18 1 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-64
AA
Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.65
Approach LOS B B A B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.04 10.86 9.02 10.59
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 48.15 40.27 12.09 25.37 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.93 1.61 0.48 1.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.40 0.36 0.14 0.26
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 741 709 695 637
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-65
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.143
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 31.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: SR33/Sherman Parkway-Jenson Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 425.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 10 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 301 66 114 428 18 24 13 3 27 16 50 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 75 17 29 107 65 3 71 4 13 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 301 66 114 428 18 24 13 3 27 16 50 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 301 66 114 428 18 24 13 3 27 16 50 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-66
AA
Intersection LOS D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.63
Approach LOS A A D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.11 1.70 28.94 18.50
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.34 0.34 0.34 7.92 0.00 0.00 19.22 19.22 19.22 20.49 20.49 20.49 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.82 Movement LOS A A AA A DA D C D C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.34 0.00 0.00 31.40 27.42 15.80 26.38 24.21 12.42 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.06 0.00 0.14 0.08 0.07 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 2 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 1
Flared Lane No Yes
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-67
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.029
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 3: SR33/Yolo Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 00 0 00 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 64 288 60 365 55 45 1 55 7 2 5 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 16 72 20 91 14 11 0 14 2 1 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 64 288 60 365 55 45 1 55 7 2 5 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 64 288 60 365 55 45 1 55 7 2 5 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-68
AA
Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.38
Approach LOS A A B C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.52 0.11 12.99 16.37
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 4.46 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 16.63 16.63 16.63 3.30 3.30 3.30 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.13 0.13 0.13 Movement LOS A A A A A BA B CB C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.35 0.00 0.00 7.84 0.00 0.00 14.24 14.39 11.95 20.16 18.33 10.27 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.01 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 2 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-69
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.390
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 24.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: SR33/Kern Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 60.00 100.00 100.00 65.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 14 270 131 65 286 23 33 56 22 78 56 51 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 68 33 16 72 86 14 6 20 14 13 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 270 131 65 286 23 33 56 22 78 56 51 Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 270 131 65 286 23 33 56 22 78 56 51 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-70
AA
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 18 00 17 00 16 00 14 0
Walk [s] 0 7 00 7 00 7 00 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 9 29 0 21 41 0 14 27 0 23 36 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference LeadGreen
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-71
AA
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 20.36 162.66 86.61 97.18 45.90 101.98 102.46 129.67 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.81 6.51 3.46 3.89 1.84 4.08 4.10 5.19 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.31 90.37 48.11 53.99 25.50 56.66 56.92 72.04 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.45 3.61 1.92 2.16 1.02 2.27 2.28 2.88 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No
Lane Group LOS E A E A E E E D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 63.63 8.54 62.19 6.10 62.80 58.81 59.30 51.42 X, volume / capacity 0.52 0.38 0.79 0.27 0.67 0.78 0.79 0.74 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 14.83 1.03 15.26 0.56 14.79 12.54 12.99 7.23 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 48.80 7.51 46.93 5.54 48.01 46.27 46.31 44.20 c, Capacity [veh/h] 27 1058 82 1162 49 100 99 145
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 1591 1603 1661 1603 1603 1603 1552 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.25 0.04 0.19 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.07 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.02 0.67 0.05 0.70 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.09 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 67 5 70 3 6 6 9
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Lane Group L C L C L C L C
Lane Group Calculations
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-72
AA
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 63.63 8.54 8.54 62.19 6.10 6.10 62.80 58.81 58.81 59.30 51.42 51.42 Movement LOS E A A E A A E E E E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.40 15.85 60.00 54.74
Approach LOS B B E D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 24.91
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.390
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 39.61 39.61 39.61 39.61
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.249 2.221 2.000 2.063 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 500 740 460 640 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 28.13 19.85 29.65 23.12
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 3.086 3.018 2.508 2.553 Bicycle LOS C C B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-73
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.339
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 21.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: SR33/Merced Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 10 0 10 0 11 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11 281 62 66 320 50 22 55 14 88 59 57 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 3 70 16 17 80 13 6 14 4 22 15 14 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 11 281 62 66 320 50 22 55 14 88 59 57 Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 11 281 62 66 320 50 22 55 14 88 59 57 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-74
AA
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 17 00 19 00 18 00 19 0
Walk [s] 0 7 00 7 00 7 00 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 14 28 0 16 30 0 16 29 0 17 30 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference LeadGreen
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Semi-actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-75
AA
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 15.26 117.89 80.30 108.41 27.51 63.59 14.48 101.53 56.97 56.11 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.61 4.72 3.21 4.34 1.10 2.54 0.58 4.06 2.28 2.24 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 8.48 65.50 44.61 60.23 15.28 35.33 8.04 56.40 31.65 31.17 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.34 2.62 1.78 2.41 0.61 1.41 0.32 2.26 1.27 1.25 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS E A E A E D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 60.50 7.56 58.19 6.23 56.25 53.02 42.85 53.64 40.06 40.97 X, volume / capacity 0.50 0.32 0.80 0.32 0.57 0.70 0.21 0.80 0.38 0.44 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 16.43 0.79 15.96 0.76 12.78 10.74 1.54 12.35 1.56 2.28 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 44.07 6.77 42.22 5.47 43.47 42.28 41.30 41.30 38.50 38.69 c, Capacity [veh/h] 22 1069 83 1139 38 78 67 110 154 131 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1603 1631 1603 1644 1603 1683 1431 1603 1683 1431 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.21 0.04 0.23 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.04 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.01 0.66 0.05 0.69 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 1 59 5 62 2 4 64 8 8
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Lane Group L C L C L C LR C R
Lane Group Calculations
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-76
AA
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 60.50 7.56 7.56 58.19 6.23 6.23 56.25 53.02 42.85 53.64 40.06 40.97 Movement LOS E A A E A A E D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.21 14.09 52.24 46.17
Approach LOS A B D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.73
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.339
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.67 34.67 34.67 34.67
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.234 2.242 2.191 2.241 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 533 578 556 578 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 24.20 22.76 23.47 22.76
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.985 3.121 2.628 2.738 Bicycle LOS C C B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-77
AA
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.294
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 21.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: SR33/Inyo Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 25.00 25.00
Pocket Length [ft] 75.00 100.00 90.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 125.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 11 0 00 0 10 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 346 171 27 274 11 18 15 19 90 13 30 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 87 43 7 69 53 4 5 23 3 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 20 346 171 27 274 11 18 15 19 90 13 30 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 20 346 171 27 274 11 18 15 19 90 13 30 Name
Volumes
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-78
AA
Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.56
Approach LOS A A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.29 0.70 16.04 18.62
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.19 0.00 0.00 1.71 0.00 0.00 11.83 11.83 11.83 29.90 6.62 6.62 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.47 1.20 0.26 0.26 Movement LOS A A AA A CA C CB C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.86 0.00 0.00 8.04 0.00 0.00 20.23 17.08 11.26 21.58 16.24 10.77 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.29 0.04 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-79
AA
Turning Movement Volume: Summary
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing PM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 3 PM Peak 1034
Total
Volume
30 Right
13 Thru
90 Left
Westbound
19 Right
15 Thru
18 Left
Eastbound
11 Right
274
Thru
27 Left
Southbound
171
Right
346
Thru
20 Left
Northbound
6 SR33/Inyo Avenue
ID Intersection Name
1085
Total
Volume
57 Right
59 Thru
88 Left
Westbound
14 Right
55 Thru
22 Left
Eastbound
50 Right
320
Thru
66 Left
Southbound
62 Right
281
Thru
11 Left
Northbound
5 SR33/Merced Street
ID Intersection Name
1085
Total
Volume
51 Right
56 Thru
78 Left
Westbound
22 Right
56 Thru
33 Left
Eastbound
23 Right
286
Thru
65 Left
Southbound
131
Right
270
Thru
14 Left
Northbound
4 SR33/Kern Street
ID Intersection Name
893
Total
Volume
5 Right
2 Thru
7 Left
Westbound
55 Right
1 Thru
45 Left
Eastbound
55 Right
365
Thru
6 Left
Southbound
0 Right
288
Thru
64 Left
Northbound
3 SR33/Yolo Street
ID Intersection Name
1065
Total
Volume
50 Right
16 Thru
27 Left
Westbound
3 Right
13 Thru
24 Left
Eastbound
18 Right
428
Thru
114
Left
Southbound
66 Right
301
Thru
5 Left
Northbound
SR33/Sherman ParkwayJenson Road 2
ID Intersection Name
808
Total
Volume
1 Right
18 Thru
144
Left
Westbound
72 Right
23 Thru
2 Left
Eastbound
2 Right
249
Thru
1 Left
Southbound
98 Right
177
Thru
21 Left
Northbound
1 SR33/Stuhr Road
ID Intersection Name
Version 7.00-06
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-80
AA
Turning Movement Volume: Detail
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing PM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 3 PM Peak 1085
0 0
0 -
1085
Total
Volume
51 0
0 0
1.00 51
Right
56 0
0 0
1.00 56
Thru
78 0
0 0
1.00 78
Left
Westbound
22 0
0 0
1.00 22
Right
56 0
0 0
1.00 56
Thru
33 0
0 0
1.00 33
Left
Eastbound
23 0
0 0
1.00 23
Right
286
0 0
0 1.00
286
Thru
65 0
0 0
1.00 65
Left
Southbound
131
0 0
0 1.00
131
Right
270
0 0
0 1.00
270
Thru
14 0
0 0
1.00 14
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Kern
Street 4
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
893
0 0
0 -
893
Total
Volume
5 0
0 0
1.00 5
Right
2 0
0 0
1.00 2
Thru
7 0
0 0
1.00 7
Left
Westbound
55 0
0 0
1.00 55
Right
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Thru
45 0
0 0
1.00 45
Left
Eastbound
55 0
0 0
1.00 55
Right
365
0 0
0 1.00
365
Thru
6 0
0 0
1.00 6
Left
Southbound
0 0
0 0
1.00 0
Right
288
0 0
0 1.00
288
Thru
64 0
0 0
1.00 64
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Yolo
Street 3
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1065
0 0
0 -
1065
Total
Volume
50 0
0 0
1.00 50
Right
16 0
0 0
1.00 16
Thru
27 0
0 0
1.00 27
Left
Westbound
3 0
0 0
1.00 3
Right
13 0
0 0
1.00 13
Thru
24 0
0 0
1.00 24
Left
Eastbound
18 0
0 0
1.00 18
Right
428
0 0
0 1.00
428
Thru
114
0 0
0 1.00
114
Left
Southbound
66 0
0 0
1.00 66
Right
301
0 0
0 1.00
301
Thru
5 0
0 0
1.00 5
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Sherman
ParkwayJenson Road
2 Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
808
0 0
0 -
808
Total
Volume
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Right
18 0
0 0
1.00 18
Thru
144
0 0
0 1.00
144
Left
Westbound
72 0
0 0
1.00 72
Right
23 0
0 0
1.00 23
Thru
2 0
0 0
1.00 2
Left
Eastbound
2 0
0 0
1.00 2
Right
249
0 0
0 1.00
249
Thru
1 0
0 0
1.00 1
Left
Southbound
98 0
0 0
1.00 98
Right
177
0 0
0 1.00
177
Thru
21 0
0 0
1.00 21
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Stuhr
Road 1
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 7.0006
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-81
AA
1034
0 0
0 -
1034
Total
Volume
30 0
0 0
1.00 30
Right
13 0
0 0
1.00 13
Thru
90 0
0 0
1.00 90
Left
Westbound
19 0
0 0
1.00 19
Right
15 0
0 0
1.00 15
Thru
18 0
0 0
1.00 18
Left
Eastbound
11 0
0 0
1.00 11
Right
274
0 0
0 1.00
274
Thru
27 0
0 0
1.00 27
Left
Southbound
171
0 0
0 1.00
171
Right
346
0 0
0 1.00
346
Thru
20 0
0 0
1.00 20
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Inyo
Avenue 6
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
1085
0 0
0 -
1085
Total
Volume
57 0
0 0
1.00 57
Right
59 0
0 0
1.00 59
Thru
88 0
0 0
1.00 88
Left
Westbound
14 0
0 0
1.00 14
Right
55 0
0 0
1.00 55
Thru
22 0
0 0
1.00 22
Left
Eastbound
50 0
0 0
1.00 50
Right
320
0 0
0 1.00
320
Thru
66 0
0 0
1.00 66
Left
Southbound
62 0
0 0
1.00 62
Right
281
0 0
0 1.00
281
Thru
11 0
0 0
1.00 11
Left
Northbound
Future Total
Other
Net New Trips
In Process
Growth Factor
Final Base
SR33/Merced
Street 5
Volume Type Intersection
Name ID
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-82
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 1: SR33/Stuhr Road 24 6 5 3 2
23 6 5 3 2
22 9 8 5 3
21 9 8 5 3
20 12 10 7 4
19 30 25 16 10
18 33 28 18 11
17 59 50 33 19
16 104 88 57 34
15 107 91 59 35
14 107 91 59 35
13 115 98 64 38
12 127 108 70 42
11 133 113 73 44
10 133 113 73 44
9 142 121 78 47
8 178 151 98 58
7 186 159 103 61
6 201 171 111 66
5 225 192 124 74
4 237 202 130 78
3 278 237 153 91
2 284 242 156 93
1 296 252 163 97
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-83
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 808 808 High Minor Volume Condition Met Yes No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 163 97 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:28 0:14 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 10.6 9 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 3 4 7 0 0 0 3 1 0 Hours
Met
24 2 11 2 5 No No No No No No No No No No
23 2 11 2 5 No No No No No No No No No No
22 2 17 2 8 No No No No No No No No No No
21 2 17 2 8 No No No No No No No No No No
20 2 22 2 11 No No No No No No No No No No
19 2 55 2 26 No No No No No No No No No No
18 2 61 2 29 No No No No No No No No No No
17 2 109 2 52 No No No No No No No No No No
16 2 192 2 91 No No No No No No No No No No
15 2 198 2 94 No No No No No No No No No No
14 2 198 2 94 No No No No No No No No No No
13 2 213 2 102 No No No No No No No No No No
12 2 235 2 112 No No No No No No No No No No
11 2 246 2 117 No No No No No No No No No No
10 2 246 2 117 No No No No No No No No No No
9 2 263 2 125 No No No No No No No No No No
8 2 329 2 156 No No No No No No No No No No
7 2 345 2 164 No No No Yes No No No No No No
6 2 372 2 177 No No No Yes No No No No No No
5 2 417 2 198 No No No Yes No No No No No No
4 2 439 2 208 No No Yes Yes No No No No No No
3 2 515 2 244 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
2 2 526 2 249 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No
1 2 548 2 260 No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-84
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 2: SR33/Sherman Parkway-Jenson Road 24 7 11 2 1
23 7 11 2 1
22 11 17 3 1
21 11 17 3 1
20 15 22 4 2
19 37 56 9 4
18 41 62 10 4
17 74 112 19 8
16 130 196 33 14
15 134 202 33 14
14 134 202 33 14
13 145 218 36 16
12 160 241 40 17
11 167 252 42 18
10 167 252 42 18
9 179 269 45 19
8 223 336 56 24
7 234 353 59 25
6 253 381 63 27
5 283 426 71 30
4 298 448 74 32
3 350 526 87 38
2 357 538 89 38
1 372 560 93 40
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 Yes
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-85
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1065 1065 High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 93 40
Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:28 0:19 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 18.5 28.9 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 0 0 3 1 4 6 8 3 0 Hours
Met
24 3 18 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
23 3 18 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
22 3 28 2 4 No No No No No No No No No No
21 3 28 2 4 No No No No No No No No No No
20 3 37 2 6 No No No No No No No No No No
19 3 93 2 13 No No No No No No No No No No
18 3 103 2 14 No No No No No No No No No No
17 3 186 2 27 No No No No No No No No No No
16 3 326 2 47 No No No No No No No No No No
15 3 336 2 47 No No No No No No No No No No
14 3 336 2 47 No No No No No No No No No No
13 3 363 2 52 No No No No No No No No No No
12 3 401 2 57 No No No No No No No No No No
11 3 419 2 60 No No No No No No No No No No
10 3 419 2 60 No No No No No No No No No No
9 3 448 2 64 No No No No No No No No No No
8 3 559 2 80 No No No No No No No Yes No No
7 3 587 2 84 No No No No No No No Yes No No
6 3 634 2 90 No No No No No No Yes Yes No No
5 3 709 2 101 No No No No No No Yes Yes No No
4 3 746 2 106 No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No
3 3 876 2 125 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
2 3 895 2 127 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
1 3 932 2 133 No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-86
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 3: SR33/Yolo Street 24 7 9 0 2
23 7 9 0 2
22 11 13 0 3
21 11 13 0 3
20 14 17 1 4
19 35 43 1 10
18 39 47 2 11
17 70 85 3 20
16 123 149 5 35
15 127 153 5 36
14 127 153 5 36
13 137 166 5 39
12 151 183 6 43
11 158 192 6 45
10 158 192 6 45
9 169 204 7 48
8 211 256 8 61
7 222 268 9 64
6 239 290 10 69
5 268 324 11 77
4 282 341 11 81
3 331 400 13 95
2 338 409 13 97
1 352 426 14 101
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 70%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph Yes
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-87
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 893 893 High Minor Volume Condition Met No Yes
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 14 101 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:03 0:21 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 1 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 16.4 13 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 0 0 3 0 3 3 6 3 0 Hours
Met
24 4 16 2 2 No No No No No No No No No No
23 4 16 2 2 No No No No No No No No No No
22 4 24 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
21 4 24 2 3 No No No No No No No No No No
20 4 31 2 5 No No No No No No No No No No
19 4 78 2 11 No No No No No No No No No No
18 4 86 2 13 No No No No No No No No No No
17 4 155 2 23 No No No No No No No No No No
16 4 272 2 40 No No No No No No No No No No
15 4 280 2 41 No No No No No No No No No No
14 4 280 2 41 No No No No No No No No No No
13 4 303 2 44 No No No No No No No No No No
12 4 334 2 49 No No No No No No No No No No
11 4 350 2 51 No No No No No No No No No No
10 4 350 2 51 No No No No No No No No No No
9 4 373 2 55 No No No No No No No No No No
8 4 467 2 69 No No No No No No No No No No
7 4 490 2 73 No No No No No No No No No No
6 4 529 2 79 No No No No No No No Yes No No
5 4 592 2 88 No No No No No No No Yes No No
4 4 623 2 92 No No No No No No No Yes No No
3 4 731 2 108 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
2 4 747 2 110 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
1 4 778 2 115 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-88
AA
Signal Warrants Report For Intersection 6: SR33/Inyo Avenue 24 11 6 3 1
23 11 6 3 1
22 16 9 4 2
21 16 9 4 2
20 21 12 5 2
19 54 31 13 5
18 59 34 15 6
17 107 62 27 10
16 188 109 47 18
15 193 112 48 19
14 193 112 48 19
13 209 122 52 20
12 231 134 57 22
11 242 140 60 23
10 242 140 60 23
9 258 150 64 25
8 322 187 80 31
7 338 197 84 33
6 365 212 90 35
5 408 237 101 40
4 430 250 106 42
3 505 293 125 49
2 516 300 128 50
1 537 312 133 52
S N E W
Hour Major Streets Minor Streets
Warrant Analysis Traffic Volumes
Warrant Factor 100%
Population < 10,000 No
Speed > 40mph No
Minor Approaches E, W
Major Approaches S, N
Intersection Warrants Parameters
#3 Peak Hour No
#2 Four Hour Vehicular Volume No
#1 Eight Hour Vehicular Volume No
Warrant Name Met?
Warrants Summary
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-89
AA
Warrant Met for Intersection No
Warrant Met for Approach No No
Total Volume Condition Met Yes Yes
Number of Approaches on Intersection 4 4
Total Entering Volume on All Approaches During Same Hour 1034 1034 High Minor Volume Condition Met No No
Volume on Minor Street Approach During Same Hour 133 52 Delay Condition Met No No
VehicleHours of Stopped Delay on Minor Approach ([h]h:mm) 0:41 0:13 Number of Lanes on Minor Street Approach 2 1
Total Stopped Delay Per Vehicle on Minor Approach (s) 18.6 16 Orientation E W
Warrant 3 Condition A
0 0 0 3 0 3 5 8 0 0 Hours
Met
24 5 17 3 4 No No No No No No No No No No
23 5 17 3 4 No No No No No No No No No No
22 5 25 3 6 No No No No No No No No No No
21 5 25 3 6 No No No No No No No No No No
20 5 33 3 7 No No No No No No No No No No
19 5 85 3 18 No No No No No No No No No No
18 5 93 3 21 No No No No No No No No No No
17 5 169 3 37 No No No No No No No No No No
16 5 297 3 65 No No No No No No No No No No
15 5 305 3 67 No No No No No No No No No No
14 5 305 3 67 No No No No No No No No No No
13 5 331 3 72 No No No No No No No No No No
12 5 365 3 79 No No No No No No No No No No
11 5 382 3 83 No No No No No No No No No No
10 5 382 3 83 No No No No No No No No No No
9 5 408 3 89 No No No No No No No No No No
8 5 509 3 111 No No No No No No No Yes No No
7 5 535 3 117 No No No No No No No Yes No No
6 5 577 3 125 No No No No No No No Yes No No
5 5 645 3 141 No No No No No No Yes Yes No No
4 5 680 3 148 No No No No No No Yes Yes No No
3 5 798 3 174 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No
2 5 816 3 178 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No
1 5 849 3 185 No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No
Condition
B Number Volume Number Volume 100% 80% 70% 56% 100% 80% 70% 56% Hour Major Lanes Minor Lanes Warrant 1 Condition A Warrant 1 Condition B Warrant 2 Warrant 3 Warrant Analysis by Hour
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-90
AA
Study Intersections
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-91
AA
Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-92
AA
Traffic Volume - Base Volume
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-93
AA
Traffic Conditions
Version 7.00-06
Generated with
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-94
AA
Network Statistics
Report File: N:\...\NVM001 Existing PM Peak Conditions 2/3/2021
2.pdf
Vistro File: N:\...\Existing LOS.vistro Scenario 3 PM Peak Network Height [mi] 1.7
Network Width [mi] 0.6
Total Link Length [mi] 5.4
Number of Routes 0
Number of Paths 0
Number of Gates 0
Number of Zones 0
Number of Links 38
- Unknown 0
- All-way stop 1
- Two-way stop 3
- Roundabout 0
- Signalized 2
Number of Intersections 6
Version 7.0006
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-95
AA
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) Signal Warrant
55 mph
70 feet
764 VPH
25 PPH
Reference: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2014 Edition Installation of a HAWK Signal is warranted when the plotted point (see graph above) falls above the curve representing the corresponding crosswalk length (L).
If the length (L) of the crosswalk does not match one displayed on the graph, interpolate between existing curves to find the position of the curve representing the crosswalk length being analyzed.
Note:
Crosswalk Length:
Major Street Approach Volume:
Pedestrians Crossing:
WARRANT MET? Borderline
Speed Limit:
High-Speed Roadway
Project Name: SR33 Corridor Study
Scenario: PM Existing
Location: Jensen Road
Date of Count: Normalized 2020
0 100
200
300
400
500
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
TOTAL PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (PPH)
MAJOR STREET VOLUME - TOTAL OF APPROACHES (VPH)
L=100 ft L=72 ft Baseline = 20 PPH L= 50 ft L= 34 ft Inputs W-Trans 11/2/2021
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-96
AA
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) Signal Warrant
35 mph
55 feet
778 VPH
25 PPH
Reference: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2014 Edition Installation of a HAWK Signal is warranted when the plotted point (see graph above) falls above the curve representing the corresponding crosswalk length (L).
If the length (L) of the crosswalk does not match one displayed on the graph, interpolate between existing curves to find the position of the curve representing the crosswalk length being analyzed.
Note:
Crosswalk Length:
Major Street Approach Volume:
Pedestrians Crossing:
WARRANT MET? Borderline
Speed Limit:
High-Speed Roadway
Project Name: SR33 Corridor Study
Scenario: PM Existing
Location: Yolo Street
Date of Count: Normalized 2020
0 100
200
300
400
500
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
TOTAL PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (PPH)
MAJOR STREET VOLUME - TOTAL OF APPROACHES (VPH)
L=100 ft L=72 ft Baseline = 20 PPH L= 50 ft L= 34 ft Inputs W-Trans 11/2/2021
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-97
AA
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) Signal Warrant
35 mph
50 feet
796 VPH
25 PPH
Reference: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2014 Edition Speed Limit:
High-Speed Roadway
Project Name: SR33 Corridor Study
Scenario: PM Existing
Location: Fresno Street
Date of Count: Normalized 2020
Crosswalk Length:
Major Street Approach Volume:
Pedestrians Crossing:
WARRANT MET? Borderline
Installation of a HAWK Signal is warranted when the plotted point (see graph above) falls above the curve representing the corresponding crosswalk length (L).
If the length (L) of the crosswalk does not match one displayed on the graph, interpolate between existing curves to find the position of the curve representing the crosswalk length being analyzed.
Note:
0 100
200
300
400
500
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
TOTAL PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (PPH)
MAJOR STREET VOLUME - TOTAL OF APPROACHES (VPH)
L=100 ft L=72 ft Baseline = 20 PPH L= 50 ft L= 34 ft Inputs W-Trans 11/2/2021
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-98
AA
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) Signal Warrant
45 mph
65 feet
920 VPH
25 PPH
Reference: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2014 Edition Speed Limit:
High-Speed Roadway
Project Name: SR33 Corridor Study
Scenario: PM Existing
Location: South of Inyo
Date of Count: Normalized 2020
Crosswalk Length:
Major Street Approach Volume:
Pedestrians Crossing:
WARRANT MET? Borderline
Installation of a HAWK Signal is warranted when the plotted point (see graph above) falls above the curve representing the corresponding crosswalk length (L).
If the length (L) of the crosswalk does not match one displayed on the graph, interpolate between existing curves to find the position of the curve representing the crosswalk length being analyzed.
Note:
0 100
200
300
400
500
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
TOTAL PEDESTRIAN VOLUME (PPH)
MAJOR STREET VOLUME - TOTAL OF APPROACHES (VPH)
L=100 ft L=72 ft Baseline = 20 PPH L= 50 ft L= 34 ft Inputs W-Trans 11/2/2021
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-99
AA
References Regarding Selection of
Appropriate Lane Widths
Federal Highway Administration
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/geometric/pubs/mitigationstrategies/chapter3/3_lanewidth.cfm Pedestrian Safety
While decreased lane width in rural settings can cause an increase in collisions, “In a reducedspeed urban environment, the effects of reduced lane width are different. On such facilities, the risk of lane-departure crashes is less.”
Narrower lane widths provide increased safety measures for pedestrians and bicyclists, due to shorten crossing distance. With a decrease in lane width, there is room to incorporate “other cross-sectional elements, such as medians for access control, bike lanes, on-street parking, transit stops, and landscaping.”
Adoption of lane reduction in low-speed urban roads, “provide adequate flexibility to achieve a desirable urban cross section without a design exception.” National Association of City Transportation Officials
https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/lane-width/ NACTO research claims that, “Narrower streets help promote slower driving speeds which, in turn, reduce the severity of crashes.” Narrower lane widths also have a positive effect on the ability to manage storm water, reduce crossing distances, and shortened signal cycles.
Speed
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-100
AA
Table below shows how increased lane width is correlated with higher speeds, in school zones it is recommended to reduce the width of lanes to promoted slower vehicle speeds in the area.
Disadvantages of 12-ft Lane Width
Higher Speeds
https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/designing_safety_of_ped_cyclists_and_motorists_dumbaugh.pdf Study found that on their test suburban streets that greater lane widths have a high correlation with higher speeds. “Higher vehicle speeds result in an increase in both the frequency and severity of crashes involving pedestrians.” And that, “Examinations of the spatial distribution of pedestrian crashes show that they cluster along urban arterials, precisely the category of roadways designed with the forgiving roadway features intended to enhance the safety of motorists.”
Traffic Capacity
https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/lanewidth/#footnotes Research done by the Florida Department of Transportation found that, “The measured saturation flow rates are similar for lane widths between 10 feet and 12 feet...Thus, so long as all other geometric and traffic signalization conditions remain constant, there is no measurable decrease in urban street capacity when through lane widths are narrowed from 12 feet to 10 City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-101
AA
feet.” There is little to no significant correlation in decrease traffic capacity when lane widths are reduced.
Positive Outcome of 11-ft Lane Width
Bicycle Safety
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_330.pdf A study was done by the National Academics of Science Engineering and Medicine and state from data collected that, “A Maryland study (35) found that 12-ft curb lanes did not provide sufficient width for shared bicycle and vehicle operations.” (pg.15) https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/designing_safety_of_ped_cyclists_and_motorists_dumbaugh.pdf Studies have also proven that crashes have a significant increase in intersections or areas of conflicting streams of traffic. NACTO states that adding traffic designs that give right away or separate different modes of transit lead to a decrease in crash incidents, (for example adding bike lanes or traffic signalization).
Designing with Area in Mind
https://www.citylab.com/design/2014/10/why-12-foot-traffic-lanes-are-disastrous-for-safetyand-must-be-replaced-now/381117/ Using 12-ft lanes have been the practice for a while in some areas, however data showed that narrower lanes are a better design method for areas that have slower speeds and higher foot traffic. The AASHTO, publisher of Green Book, state, “For rural and urban arterials, lane widths may vary from 10 to 12 feet. 12-foot lanes should be used where practical on higher-speed, free-flowing, principal arterials. However, under interrupted-flow (signalized) conditions operating at lower speeds (35 MPH or less), narrower lane widths are normally quite adequate and have some advantages.”
School Zones
http://www.virginiadot.org/programs/resources/walkToSchool/2016/zino/2016_08_26_VDOT_ LDL_Speed_Reduction_FINAL.pdf
The Institute of Traffic Engineers recommend that roads that travel through school zoned areas should have lane widths of 10-11-ft for more walkability. They state that “Narrow travel lanes also create more space for other street elements, including parking, bike lanes or buffers between the travel lanes and the sidewalk.”
Accident Rates
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_330.pdf The study done by NASEM found that reducing lane widths to 11ft on three of their study sites, “collectively reduced accident rate by 52.0 percent.” Lane widths have a significant correlation with speed and accident rates, thus reducing lane width from 12-ft to 11-ft leads to increased safety for all modes of transportation.
January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-102
AA
Summarized Highlights
From multiple researches on lane widths and from exerted traffic engineers, here are some take away points about 11-ft lane widths.
¾ There is a decrease in collisions in 11-ft lane width roads compared to 12-ft lane widths. ¾ Decrease in lane width correlates with reduced automobile speeds ¾ Higher speeds have a high correlation with increased traffic accidents, and increases the severity of injuries during accidents.
o Thus, a decrease in lane width makes it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists to use roads.
o Decreases the length needed to cross by pedestrians, which allows for better access for a higher range of age demographics and physical abilities. ¾ Decreasing lane widths allow for more availability to add other design elements such as a bicycle lane.
¾ There is no significant change to traffic capacity when reducing lane width from 12-ft to 11-ft.
¾ 12-ft lane width is better suited for non-signalized areas with high speed limits.
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-103
AA
JENSEN RD
SHERMAN PKWY
SR 33
NTS
Proposed Highway 33 and Jensen Road/Sherman Parkway Intersection January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-104
AA
KERN ST
TULARE ST
MARIPOSA ST
YOLO ST
N ST N ST N ST
NTS
Proposed Highway 33 and Yolo Street to Tulare Street Intersections City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-105
AA
INYO AVE
MERCED ST
STANISLAUS ST
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP N ST
N ST N ST
N ST
NTS
Proposed Highway 33 and Stanislaus Street / Inyo Avenue Intersections January 2022
City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan A-106
AA
INYO AVE
STANISLAUS ST
STOP
STOP N ST N ST
N ST
NTS
Proposed Highway 33 and Stanislaus Street / Inyo Avenue Intersections City of Newman | Highway 33 Specific Plan Update | Public Review Draft January 2022
Appendix A: Technical Analysis and Corridor Concept Plan This page intentionally left blank
APPENDIX A
COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARIES
APPENDIX B
A-1
AA
B-1
B