Norco City Council
January 19, 2022

CA-26
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________________________

CA-27

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #_____________________

1. Insurance Company _____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From)________________(To) _______________ Endorsement Effective Date ___________

3. Named Insured________________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________ /_____________________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention
(Nil unless otherwise specified):
$____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. The City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers, employees and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this

CA-28
policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers; or (b) stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 (“any auto”) and endorsement CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Section (1).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

CA-29
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
____________________________________________________
(Telephone Number)
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________

CA-30
WORKER’S COMPENSATION/EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ (“the Company”)
Policy Number _________________________________________________

2. Effective Date of this Endorsement ________________________________

3. Named Insured_________________________________________________

4. Employer’s Liability Limit (Coverage B)______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premium and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
(1) Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.
(2) Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the City of Norco.

CA-31
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, _______________________, warrant that I have authority to bind (Print/Type Name)
the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: ____________________________________________________ TITLE: ____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: ____________________________________________________

CA-32

CA-33

CA-34

CA-35

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.J.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Lisette Free, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended December 31, 2021 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2021.

SUMMARY:

Staff is recommending that the City Council receive and file the City’s quarterly investment report for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. This report has been prepared to meet the requirements of the City’s Investment Policy and applicable sections of the State of California Government Code.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s Investment Policy requires the Treasurer to render a quarterly report to the legislative body. The report is to be prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 53646 (b)(1) and should contain detailed information on all securities, investments, and monies of the local agency; a statement of compliance of the portfolio with the Statement of Investment Policy; and a statement of the City’s ability to meet its cash flow requirements for the next six months. This report, which is for the quarter ended December 31, 2021, meets the requirements of the Investment Policy and Government Code. It covers funds of the City and the Successor Agency to the former Norco Redevelopment Agency.

The attached schedules (attachments 1 through 4) have been prepared to meet the detailed requirements of the Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy as approved by the Council on May 5, 2021. It is to be noted that the Investment Policy excludes certain investments (bond proceeds) from these requirements. This means that bond proceeds are invested in accordance with the provisions of the bond indentures rather than the provisions of the Investment Policy. Consequently, in determining whether

the operating portfolio holdings are in compliance with the Government Code and the approved Investment Policy, investments of bond proceeds have been excluded.

Attachment 1 provides a summary schedule of the City’s operating portfolio holdings by type as of December 31, 2021. This summary also provides information on whether or not each investment category complies with the limitations imposed by State law and the City’s Investment Policy. Investments that are subject to the Statement of Investment Policy are operating or idle funds invested by the Treasurer within the provisions of the approved Investment Policy. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, the operating portfolio increased by a net amount of $10.8 million from $79.9 million to $90.7 million.

Traditionally, revenue receipts during second quarter of the fiscal year are not sufficient to cover expenditures due to the lag in the receipt of property tax, vehicle license fees, sales tax in lieu, electric and gas franchise fee revenues. However, this quarter that trend reversed mainly due to significant development impact and agreement fees received from CapRock Partners for the Palomino Phase I and Saddle Ranch Phase II projects.

Additionally, Measure R transactions and use tax revenues received during the period exceeded expenditures. The net increase of $10.8 million would have been $1 million higher if it were not for the initial contribution to the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) for pension rate stabilization program trust.

Attachment 2 provides a graphical breakdown of the operating portfolio holdings by investment type as of December 31, 2021. This chart is for investments that are subject to the Investment Policy. The operating portfolio consisted of 82% investment in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), 14% in Agency Securities and the remaining 4% in cash and cash equivalents.

A summary of investments not subject to the provisions of the Investment Policy (bond proceeds and debt service reserve funds) is also shown on Attachment 1. These funds are invested in accordance with applicable bond indenture provisions. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, bond proceeds and debt service reserve fund portfolio increased by a net amount of $.4 million from $6.5 million to $6.9 million due to the timing of the transfers for debt service payments.

Attachment 3 provides a detailed listing of the City’s portfolio holdings as required by the Government Code. In this listing, “N/A” is used to denote that the information is either not available or applicable. Agency Securities issued by United States Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs) are rated “AA+” by S&P rating service and “Aaa” by Moody’s and Fitch rating service.

Attachment 4 indicates cash balances by Fund as additional information to complement the schedule of investment holdings. For the Operating Funds, the cash balance provides an indication of the financial health of each Fund.

CASH FLOWS: Based on cash balances as of December 31, 2021 and anticipated cash receipts for the next six months, staff estimates that there will be sufficient cash to cover disbursements for the City and Successor Agency for the next six months ending June 30, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Quarterly Investment Report is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 “Assure financial stability by identifying new revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.”
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 2
Attachment No. 3
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 5

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Summary
As of December 31, 2021
City Investments Subject to Investment Policy Market Value Percentage Policy Maximum Compliance Cash and Cash Equivalents 4,217,494 $ 4.65% NA In Compliance Local Agency Investment Fund 74,057,707 81.65% 100% In Compliance U.S. and Agency Securities 12,421,425 13.70% 100% In Compliance Total $ 90,696,626 100.00%

0.269%
City Investments Not Subject to Investment Policy Market Value Percentage Community Facilities Districts 1,774,368 $ 25.77%
Sewer and Water System 13,883 0.20%
Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,098,252 74.03%
Total $ 6,886,503 100.00%

0.466%
Estimated Portfolio Yield
Estimated Portfolio Yield
Attachment 1

BEGINNING AND ENDING VALUES BREAKDOWN OF INVESTMENTS
Beg. Market Values Ending Market Values
Breakdown 9/30/2021 12/31/2021 Investments Subject to Investment Policy Portfolio % Rating Cash & Investments 74,889,409 78,275,201 Local Agency Investment Fund 74,057,707 82% Not Rated US Government Agency Securities 4,986,050 12,421,425 Federal Home Loan Banks 12,421,425 14% Aaa Total Market Value 79,875,459 90,696,626 Wells Fargo Checking Account 4,212,383 4% Not Rated US Bank Principal Cash 5,111 0% Not Rated
TOTAL 90,696,626 100%

SUMMARY OF CITY OF NORCO'S PORTFOLIO

INVESTMENTS SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT POLICY
Not Rated
86%
Rated
14%
By Rating
< 1 year
86%
1-3 years
8%
> 3 years
6%
By Maturity (Years)
Local Agency
Investment Fund
82%
Federal Home
Loan Banks
14%
Cash
4%
By Type
Attachment 2

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of December 31, 2021
Investments Subject to Policy
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Checking Accounts N/A Wells Fargo N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 4,212,383 4,212,383 N/A N/A N/A Principal Cash N/A US Bank N/A N/A 0.40% N/A 5,111 5,111 Subtotal 4,217,494 4,217,494
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 74,067,065 74,057,707 Subtotal 74,067,065 74,057,707
US Bank Custodial Account
06/28/21 09/30/24 3130AMV74 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.400% 0.40% 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,923,750 12/30/21 12/30/24 3130AQAR4 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 1.85% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,498,700 12/23/21 12/23/24 3130AQAS2 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 1.070% 1.82% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,498,825 12/28/21 03/28/24 3130AQB44 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.875% 2.50% 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,150 12,500,000 12,421,425
Total Investments Subject to Policy 90,784,559 90,696,626 Attachment 3 Page 1

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of December 31, 2021
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Community Facilities Districts
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 108 108 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 65,878 65,878 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 176 176 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 9,362 9,362 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 89 89 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 13,220 13,220 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 1,095 1,095 Subtotal 89,929 89,929
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (CFD 2002-1) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 57,963 57,963 Subtotal 57,963 57,963
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
08/21/19 08/24/25 3136G4Q97 F H L M C M T N XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.650% 0.650% 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,413,432 11/10/20 08/23/24 3135GA4R9 F N M A XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.420% 0.420% 215,000 215,000 213,044 1,655,000 1,655,000 1,626,476
Total Community Facilities Districts 1,802,892 1,774,368 Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Sewer and Water System
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 11 11 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 13,865 13,865 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 6 6 Subtotal 13,883 13,883
Total Sewer and Water System 13,883 13,883
Attachment 3 Page 2

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of December 31, 2021
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 117,089 117,089 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 321 321 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 247 247 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 216 216 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.006% N/A 3,205 3,205 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 93 93 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 22 22 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 26 26 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 2,561 2,561 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 56,340 56,340 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 11 11 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 15 15 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 6,306 6,306 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 107,404 107,404 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 75 75 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 63 63 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 8,622 8,622 Subtotal 302,616 302,616
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2010 TABs) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 24,232 24,232 N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2003 TABs) XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 192,991 192,991 Subtotal 217,223 217,223
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
11/23/20 08/23/24 3135GA4R9 F N M A XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.420% 0.420% N/A 1,940,000 1,922,346 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 1,040,000 1,030,713 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 1,055,000 1,045,579 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks XI.5 US Bank AAA 0.500% 0.500% N/A 585,000 579,776 Subtotal 4,620,000 4,578,414
Total Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,139,839 5,098,252 Total Investments Not Subject to Policy 6,956,614 6,886,503 NR = Not rated
Attachment 3 Page 3

City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details by Fund
As of December 31, 2021
Investments Subject to Policy
Qtr ended
12/31/21
Fund Description Balance
016 Cal Home Grant Fund 65,398
017 Successor Agency Fund 1,678,962
018 Housing Fund 5,726,790
121 General Fund 19,084,895
122 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (145,646)
123 CDBG Fund (12,300)
124 Water Fund 5,765,581
126 Sewer Fund 3,534,098
127/132 Measure R Fund 11,720,095
128 Equipment Replacement Fund 4,070,065
129 Storm Drain Fund 563,771
131 Nancy Newman Fund 114,393
133 Gas Tax Fund 155,000
134 Benefits and Insurance Fund 739,434
135 Information Technology Fund 974,443
136 SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehab. Fund 471,588
137 Measure A Fund 982,634
139 NPDES Fund 9,525
140 General Govt Improvement Fund 662,529
141 Park Improvement Fund 707,671
142 Fire Improvement Fund 819,289
143 Trail Improvement Fund 238,743
144 Water Capital Fund 6,342,793
146 Public Meeting Facilities Fund 116,383
147 Sewer Facilities Fund 14,231,607
148 Sewer Connection Fund 445,319
149 Street Improvement Fund 2,681,383
150 Aquatics Center Fund 10,180
151 Animal Control Fund 43,203
152 Facility Improvement Fund 116,921
153 Special Asset Fund 4,439,342
154 Trust Deposit Fund 1,359,176
155 American Rescue Plan Act - ARPA 892,400
156 AQMD Fund 132,584
158 Waste Management Fund 17,805
181 CFD 97-1 186,518
182 CFD 2001-1 659,864
183 CFD 2002-1 147,203
179 LMD #1 (1,674)
176 LMD #2 (85,002)
177 LMD #3 (20,810)
186 LMD #4 202,687
187 LMD #5 123,962
Subtotal - General Ledger 89,968,803
Various Outstanding Checks/Deposits in Transit 727,823
Total Cash in Bank 90,696,626

Attachment 5
Quarterly Investment Portfolio
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2021
As required by the Government Code, the Treasurer certifies that the investments reported in the accompanying schedules (Attachments 1 through 3) comply with the City of Norco Investment Policy and that sufficient liquidity along with anticipated revenues are available to meet the City and Successor Agency budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months ending June 30, 2022. ______________________________
Lisette Free, Finance Director

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2022 Agenda Item:

2.K.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Chad Blais, Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Amend FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include additional funding for the Slurry Seal Project; and acceptance of bids and award of Contract for the Slurry Seal Project.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2022-05 to increase FY 2022-2026 CIP funding in the amount of $13,000 for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project; and accept bids and award a contract to All American Asphalt for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project in the amount of $147,435; and authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total bid amount.

SUMMARY:

Bids for FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project were opened on December 15, 2021, with All American Asphalt of Corona, California being the lowest responsible bidder. Therefore, it is recommended that a contract be awarded to All American Asphalt in the amount of $147,435 and authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total bid amount.

BACKGROUND:

Plans and specifications for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project were advertised on November 29, 2021, with a bid opening date of December 15, 2021. A total of four bids were received with proposals ranging in value from $147,435 to $164,584. The bid summary analysis has been attached for Council’s review (Bid Summary Analysis). The FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project entails the construction of new slurry and full depth asphalt replacement in various locations (see Project Exhibit).

Staff has reviewed all the bids submitted and determined that All American Asphalt of Corona, California as being the lowest responsible bidder in the amount of $147,435 (see Bid). Staff has reviewed the references of the lowest bidder and bid documents submitted and determined the bid is responsive to all requirements and the contractor has the

experience to complete the required construction activities for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project.

The FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project has an approved budget of $160,000 ($150,000 plus $10,000 for design costs) which is insufficient to fund the lowest bid amount.

Therefore, staff is recommending City Council approve Resolution 2022-05 to amend the FY 2022-2026 CIP Budget to increase the construction budget in the amount of $13,000 to ensure sufficient funding for the total project amount of $163,000 ($147,435 construction plus 10% contingency).

Based on the approval of the resolution, staff recommends that City Council award a contract to All American Asphalt in the amount of $147,435 and authorize the City Manager to approved contract change orders up to 10 percent of the total bid amount and amend appropriations for an additional $13,000.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Slurry Seal Project was approved as a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) project for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The project's costs-to-date are $8,330 in design costs. Funds in the amount of $160,000 ($150,000 for construction and $10,000 for design; project number 4902.1; account number 149.930.43160) are insufficient to fund the lowest bidder bid amount.

Adoption of Resolution 2022-05 will appropriate an additional budget amount of $13,000 (Fund 149) to ensure sufficient funding for the project is available to cover the full bid amount and a 10% contingency for a total of $163,000.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Construction of the Slurry Seal Project is consistent with Strategic Direction #1 - Establish funding for planning, maintenance, replacement and development of infrastructure.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2022-05
Bid Summary
Project Exhibit
All American Asphalt Bid
Contract

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025 CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL
FUNDS FOR FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for the City of Norco, California was adopted by the City Council on June 16, 2021; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the CIP Budget to incorporate additional funds for the FY 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Program Budget; and WHEREAS, the requested amendment includes the addition of $13,000 for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on January 19, 2022 approved the amendment to the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 to include additional funds of $13,000 totaling $163,000 for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on January 19, 2022.
______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2022-05 – Additional Funding for 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project

January 19, 2022
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on January 19, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on January 19, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Company Name / Address BID
American Asphalt South, Inc.

P.O. Box 310036
Fontana, CA 92331 $ 156,307.30
All American Asphalt
P.O. Box 2229
Corona, CA 92878-2229 $ 147,435.00
Pavement Coatings Co.
10240 San Sevaine Way
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752 $ 158,482.50
Doug Martin Co., Inc
220 Foundation Ave
La Habra, CA 90631 $ 164,583.50
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
City of Norco
2021-22 Slurry Seal
December 15, 2021 - 10:00 A.M.

BID SUMMARY SHEET
FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT

ITEM QUANTITY UNITS DESCRIPTION UNIT BID TOTAL UNIT BID TOTAL UNIT BID TOTAL UNIT BID TOTAL

BASE BID
1 245 ELT

APPLICATION OF QUICK SET EMULSION AGGREGATE
SLURRY TYPE II (CATIONIC) WITH 2 1/2 PERCENT

LATEX ADDITIVE INCLUDING CRACK SEALING,

MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION FOR PUBLIC
STREETS $320.00 $78,400.00 $324.54 $79,512.30 $346.50 $84,892.50 $369.10 $90,429.50 2 8,250 SF LOCAL FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIRS $5.50 $45,375.00 $7.40 $61,050.00 $6.00 $49,500.00 $7.06 $58,245.00 3 1 EA

ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE AND COVER TO
FINISHED SURFACE AT $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $770.00 $770.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 4 1 EA

ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE AND COVER TO FINISHED
SURFACE AT $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,700.00 $3,700.00 5 26 LF

REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT STAND ROLLED CURB PER
CITY OF NORCO STND. DWG. NO. 205 $360.00 $9,360.00 $325.00 $8,450.00 $415.00 $10,790.00 $206.00 $5,356.00 6 1 LS

THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING & PAVEMENT MARKERS
FOR PUBLIC STREETS AT $7,700.00 $7,700.00 $4,625.00 $4,625.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $5,603.00 $5,603.00 TOTAL BID AMOUNT: $147,435.00 $156,307.30 $158,482.50 $164,583.50 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. DOUG MARTIN CONTRACTING CO.

NORCONIAN DR FIFTH ST

NORCO DR

QUIET COMANCHE CT

ROCKY VIEW DR

OAK RIDGE CIR

HAMNER AV TAFT ST

L NORCO DR SIXTH ST

CEDAR AV

CREST DR MAUNA

ACACIA AV

RIVER RIDGE DR PARK ST SCHOOL AV FIFTH ST RIM

SIXTH ST

OLD HAMNER AV

HAMNER AV

HILL CT
PL
OA

NORCONIAN DR

FIFTH ST FIFTH ST

HORSELESS CARRIAGE DR
INTERSTATE 15
CEDAR
AV
SU

CORYDONAV

WESTERN AV
CIRCLE
SHADOW
CAN
NSET
CT
YON

NORCO DR FIFTH ST TANDEM WY BROKEN LANCE DR
CRAZY

HORSE LN

OUD CIR
R CL
SILVE
DR

FEATH ER
BROKEN

MORNING
LN
STAR

ALHAMBRA ST ALHAMBRA ST ALHAMBRA ST

BROKEN TWIG DR

MELANIE AV

ADELINA AV FORTUNA RD MICHELLE RD

RANCH RD

VALLEY VIEW AV

SIERRA AV
ARYANA

AV ARROYO LN

VALLEY VIEW AV MAN - O - WAR DR FRONTIER RD TROTMAN AV

CORONA AV NATIVE DANCER WY FRONTIER RD

CIR HALF

GALLUP WAY
LE RD
C

B|DDER=s NAME; All American Asphalt
400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879

CITY OF NORCO

PROPOSAL
FOR
FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
TO CITY OF NORCO, as AGENCY:

In accordance with AGENCY'S “Notice Inviting Sealed Bids,” the undersigned BIDDE hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals Rrequired for the above stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents therefore, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein.

BIDDERdeclares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and Contract Documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, BIDDER agrees to enter into a Contract with the AGENCY at the unit and/or lump sum prices set forth in the followingProposal Bid Sheet. BIDDERunderstands that failure to enter into a Contract in the manner and time prescribed willresult in forfeiture to AGENCY of the Bid Bond accompanying this proposal.

BIDDER understands that a bid is required forthe entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the Proposal Bid Sheet are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the Contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. It is agreed that the unit and/or lump sum prices bid include all appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties, and fees. In the case of discrepancies in the amounts bid, unit prices shall govern over extended amounts.

BIDDER agrees and acknowledges that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liabilityforworkman’s compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and that the BIDDER will comply with such provisions of that code before commencing the performance of this Contract if awarded to it.

BIDDERcertifies that in all previous contracts or subcontracts, all reports which may have been due under the requirements of any Agency, State, or Federal equal employment opportunity orders have been satisfactorily filed, and that no such reports are currently outstanding.

BY:

PHONE; 951-736-7600
|3|DDER'3 ADDRESS; 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879 BIDDERdeclares in the attached Non-Collusion Affidavitthat the only persons or parties interested in this proposal as principals are those named therein; that no officer, agent, or employee of the AGENCY is personally interested, directly or indirectly, in this proposal; that this proposal is made without connection to any other individual, firm, or corporation making a bid for the same work; and that this proposal is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud.

BIDDER certifies that affirmative action has been taken to seek out and consider disadvantaged business enterprises for those portions of the work to be subcontracted, and that such affirmative actions have been carefully documented, that said documentation is open to inspection, and that said affirmative action willremain in effect for the life of any contract awarded hereunder. Furthermore, BIDDERcertifies that affirmative action willbe taken to meet all equal employment opportunity requirements ofthe Contract Documents.

DATED: . - - ,2o21 BIDDER: A"/We?can Asphalt
P—
Tm_E; Edward J. Carlson, Vice President

5-Ad

RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER RIGHTTHUMBPRINT OF SIGNER
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certi?cate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validitv of that document.

State of California
County of Riverside
on December 14, 2021
Date before me,
personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(e) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she?hey executed the same in his/herltheir authorized capacity(iee),
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

SARAHAMANDALANGLEY
NotaryPubtlc- California
RiversideCounty
.' CommissionIf2337877
MyComm Fvnlrnc
rvvv
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of Sarah Amanda Lan le
Here Insert name and Title of the Of?cer Edward J. Carlson Name(s-9-of Signer(s)-
Notar Public
9 and that by his/herltheir
California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS
Signature
Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL
hand nd icial seal.
gna ure of otary Public
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document City of N°rc° Proposal
Document Date: 12/14/2021
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:

Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(e-)
Signer’s Name: Edward J. Carlson
Individual
x Corporate Of?cer — Title(s):
a Partner lJ El Limited Cl General
Vice President
El Attorney in Fact
D Trustee Top of thumb here
El Other:

Signer is Representing:

AllAmerican As halt
Number of Pages: 2
Signer’s Name: N/A
El individual
:1 Corporate Of?cer — Title(s):

El Partner D Cl Limited General
El Attorney in Fact
El Trustee
Other: N/A
Signer is Representing:

NIA
Top of thumb here
. -.-pm I-1 av, EVE‘!
um;
Man an ‘[1111

yk.“
~——-ASPH»'—\l.T--
.7L .§3;.iC/’*,,i ‘
.'-.’-12'-~-2.".-.m'-‘emu:-.x Er-‘=1
.r”‘«.L.L.*‘\3
\J1l-:FHi..r*‘-‘AN
;'\‘S.l‘¥l |.'!'
ma 1:; E11.I3A
€.V‘+.-‘fI
\'E>1
Michael Farkas
Secretary
Resolved, that this Corporation, AllAmerican Asphalt, on January 7, 2021 authorizes Edward J.

Carlson to execute bid proposals, contracts and agreements on behalf of the company in the capacity of Vice President.

CORPORATERESOLUT

N/A
N/A
B|DDER'S INFORMATION
BIDDERcertifies that the following information is true and correct:

Bidders, Name: AllAmerican Asphalt
Business Address; 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879 *'k **
T3|eph0ne;
State Contractor's License No. and Class: 257073 Class A Original Date Issued: 01/19/1971 Expiration Date: 01/31/2022 DIRRegistration No.: 1000001051
The followingare the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of all individuals, firm members, partners, joint venturers, and/or corporate officers having a principal interest in this proposal:

Edward J. Carlson, Vice President; 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879; (951) 736-7600 Matlg Luat, Eresidant; QQQEast Sgxtb Stcaet, Cgmna, CA92529; (951) 735-7§QQ Miclgaal Eatlgas, Secretacy; 400 East SixthSttaat, Corona, CA 92879; (951 1Z36-7600 The dates of any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy judgments against any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows:

Allcurrent and prior DBA's, alias, and/or fictitious business names for any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows:
** **
P-3

"""""""""
" CONTRACTORS ZEIE STATE LICENSE BOARD
---«~=«----~- ACTNE LICENSE
L-:trso‘-uroer Erurv
e«.m5w 01/31 /2022 vwvw.c-s|b.ca.gov
c............., A C12

- n
u.- = u
. v.
n
u
m. u *5
n H: .

7. I
.
n _ -
n
n H
n In
:
~ u n
u _‘ H
| 1
I
n
n
n n
n .
_— 1- --
u
n _ n
.1
"
Registration History % E?ective Date Expiration Date
5/11/2018 6/30/2019
5/8/2017 6/30/2018
5/2/2016 6/30/2017
6/9/2015 6/30/2016
8/25/2014 6/30/2015
7/1/2019 6/30/2020
7/1/2020 6/30/2023
Contractor Information
Legal Entity Name

ALLAMERICANASPHALT
Legal EntityType
Corporation
Status
Active
Registration Number
1000001051
Registration effective date
7/ 1/2020
Registration expiration date
6/30/2023
Mailing Address
PO BOX 2229 CORONA 92878 CA United States
Physical Address
400 E SIXTH ST CORONA 92879 CA United State...

Email Address
Trade Name/DBA
License Number(s)
CSLB:267073
CSLB:267073
Legal Entity Information
Corporation Number:
057879
Federal Employment Identi?cation Number:

President Name:

MARKLUER
Vice President Name:

EDWARDJ CARLSON
Treasurer Name:

MICHAELFARKAS
Secretary Name:

MICHAELFARKAS
CEO Name:

Agent of Service Name:

MICHAELFARKAS
Agent of Service Mailing Address:
400 E SIXTHST CORONA 92879 CA United States of America
Workers Compensation

Do you lease employees No
through Professional
Employer Organization
(PEO)?:

Please provide your
current workers
compensation insurance
information below:

PEO PEO PEO
PEO InformationName Phone Email
Insured by Carrier
Policy Holder Name:ALL AMERICAN ASPHALTInsurance Carrier:

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYPolicy Number:WC593205701Inception date:
7/31/2019Expiration Date:8/30/2020

CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING STATEMENT
The undersigned is licensed in accordance with the laws of the State of California providing for the registration of Contractors.

Contractor's License Number: 267073
DIR Registration No.: 1000001051
Name of Individual Contractor (Print or Type):

Name: Title:

Address:

Name:

Address or Name of Corporation: A” America“ ASPha|t
Business Address; 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879 Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ca Tomia Signature of Owner
Business:

Address or Name of Firm:

Business Address:

Signature of Secretary of Corporation
Michael Farkas, Secretary
Signature of President of Corporation
Mark Luer, Dresident
Title:

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1 189 A notary publicor other officer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validitv of that document. here

RIGHT THUMBPRIN

OFTSIGNER

RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER
State of California
County of Riverside
on December 14:2021 before me, Sarah Amanda Lan le Notar Public Date Here Insert name and Title of the Of?cer
personally appeared Mark Luer and Michael Farkas
Name(s) of Signer(s)
9 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the SARAHAMANDALANGLEY 1 person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument .. NOW‘!PUW‘ ‘cC‘"f°"“° ; and acknowledged to me that healshe/theyexecuted the same in i Cn:':l"Inel;::(d}I'el#°2u3n3t7y‘77 " hisllher/their authorized Capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their Mycomm,explr-esNov20.2024 signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS hand and of? ' lseal.

Signatur Place Notary Seal Above gnature a Notary c OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
We orType of Document Contractor's Licensing Statement
Document Date: 12/14/2021 Number of Pages: 1
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:

Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer‘ Name: Mark I-“er Signer's Name: Michael Farkas
III Individual D Individual
X Corporate Of?cer — Title(s): ' President X Corporate Of?Cer_ Twas): Secreta Parmer D '3 Limited 5 Genera” Partner U :2: Limited El General Attorney in Fact
Top of thumb here Top of thumb a Trustee
:1 Other: D Other:

Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing:

AllAmerican AS halt AllAmerican As halt

63' aI1oCu—
3‘/A
Michael Farkas, Secretary Sgnature

LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS
In compliance with the provisions of the Public Contract Code Section 4104, the undersigned bidder herewith sets forth the name, location of the place of business, and California contractor license of each Subcontractor who willperform work or labor or render service to the Prime Contractor specially fabricates and installs a portion of the work or improvement according to detailed drawings contained in the plans and specifications, in an amount in excess of one-half (1/2) of one percent (1%) ofthe General Contractor’s total bid amount or, in the case of bids or offers for the construction of streets or highways, including bridges in excess of one—ha|f of 1 percent (0.5%) of the Prime Contractor's total bid or ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whichever is greater, and the portion of the work which willbe done by each Subcontractor.

Name Under Specific
Which Sub Description of
Contractor is License DIR Address of Sub Contract % of Total Licensed Number Number Office Work Bid
M D lgbbc? 7 ‘ cf amud ;=',,/ 874-63 /oaaw 4,435! 6:416 '5 ,4:€=57‘a,. '7, /7 9 fa/error Pafemem‘ . Wlczrkm 77 a4 /oooao/47 Be ,/ mu 5+npm 3, o lfthe bidder fails to specify a Subcontractor for any portion of the work, the bidder agrees to perform the work with his own crews. (Alternative Subcontractors for the same work are prohibited by provisions of the California Government Code.) An inadvertent error in listing the California contractor license number provided pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not be grounds for filinga bid protest or grounds for considering the bid nonresponsive ifthe corrected contractor's license number issubmitted to the public entity by the prime contractor within 24 hours after the bid opening and provided the corrected contractor's license number corresponds to the submitted name and location for that subcontractor.
.
' AllAmerican Asphalt
Dated Bidder
Edward J. Carlson, Vice President Si nature
P-5

REFERENCES
The following are the names, addresses, and phone numbers forthree public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two years:
**SEE ATTACHED**

DESIGNATION OF SURETIES
The following are the names, addresses, and phone numbers for all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds:

Broker Surety: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland 777 S. Figueroa St. #3900, Los Angeles, CA 90017; Phone: 213-270-0600 P-6

2020
bduhn zandkconsu|tants.com
City of Ontario
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Contact: Ariana Kern (909) 395-2129
City of Loma Linda
25541 Barton Road
Loma Linda, CA 92354
Contact: T. Jarb Thaipejr (909) 799-4400
City of Jurupa Valley
8920 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Chase Keys (951) 332-6464
County of Orange
601 N. Ross Street, 4”‘Floor
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Contact: Albert Rodriguez
City of Compton
205 S. Willowbrook Avenue
Compton, CA 90220
Contact: Brittany Duhn (Z & K Consultants)
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Contact: Joe Fuentes (714) 536-5259
2020 Fall Pavement Rehabilitation Project
Contract Amount: $2,499,333.00
Start Date: 07/2020
End Date: 12/2020
Pavement Rehabilitation — Barton Road
Contract Amount: $768,677.00
Start Date: 04/2020
End Date: 12/2020
Granite HillDrive Pavement Rehabilitation
Contract Amount: $999,777.00
Start Date: 04/2020
End Date: 10/2020
JOC Pavement Maintenance
Contract Amount: $2,584,747 69
Start Date: 07/2020
End Date: 08/2020
Annual Residential Street Rehabilitation — Phase 1
Contract Amount: $5,295,068.00
Start Date: 05/2020
End Date: "1/2020
Arterial Rehabilitation of Graham St, Slater
Ave, Newland St and Atlanta Ave
Contract Amount: $5,181,955.00
Start Date: 05/2020
End Date: 11/2020 [email protected]
albertrodri uez oc w.oc ov com
ckeys@'|uruQava|ley.org
akern ontarioca. ov
'thai e'r lomalinda-ca. ov

2020

PAST WORK
matthewmaechler ventura.or
City of Newport Beach
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Contact: Patricia Kharazmi (949) 644-3344
City of Westminster
8200 Westminster Boulevard
Westminster, CA 92683
Contact: Theresa Tran (714) 548-3460
Crescenta Valley Water District
2700 Foothill Boulevard
La Crescenta—Montrose, CA 91214
Contact: Brook Yared (818) 236-4117
City of Alhambra
111 S. 15‘Street
Alhambra, CA 91801
Contact: Robert Bias (626) 580-5000
County of Ventura
800 8. Victoria Avenue, #1600
Ventura, CA 93009
Contact: Matt Maechler (805) 477-1911
City of Camarillo
601 Carmen Drive
Camarillo, CA 93010
Contact: Thang Tran (805) 388-5345
Cameo Highlands Street Reconstruction
Contract Amount: $2,425,694.00
Start Date: 07/2020
End Time: 11/2020
Citywide Overlay Street Improvements
Contract Amount: $1,131,621
Start Date: 02/2020
End Date: 06/2020
Final Paving of Pennsylvania Ave
Contract Amount: $82,620.00
Start Date: 02/2020
End Date: 04/2020
2020 HUD Street Improvements Project
Contract Amount: $300,433.00
Start Date: 06/2020
End Date: 10/2020
Yerba Buena Rd. (South) Pavement
Resurfacing
Contract Amount: $2,298,467.40
Start Date: 03/2020
End Date: 06/2020
Earl Joseph Drive Paving
Contract Amount: $681,901.50
Start Date: 06/2020
End Date: 07/2020
ttran cit ofcamaril|o.or
b ared cvwd.com
rbias cit ofa|hambra.or
kharazmi new ortbeachca. ov
ttran westminsterca. ov

City of Norco
2870 CI k A 3% ::;9;c%
r:‘;3:u::~;r:4:e:;:
0”
t t: S N I 951 270-5607 ' '
' C°" ac am '3 5°" ( ) Start Date: 06/2020
End Date: 12/2020
City of Orange Annual Slurry Seal FY 19-20 Various
300 E. Chapman Avenue Locations
Orange. CA 92886 Contract Amount: $377,737.78
Contact: Martin Varona (714) 744-5563 Start Date: 06/2020 End Date: 12/2020
2020
PAST
snelson ci.norco.ca.us
mvarona Cit oforan 6.0!"

2019
[email protected]
[email protected]
City of Simi Valley
2929 Tapo Canyon Rd.

Simi Valley, CA 93063
Contact: Sarah Sheshebor (805)583-6792
County of Ventura
501 Poll Street
Ventura, CA 93001
Contact: Christopher Solis (805) 654-2054
City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA. 90680
Contact: Guillermo Perez (714) 890-4204
City of Compton
205 S. Willowbrook Avenue
Compton, CA. 90220
Contact: John Strictland (310) 605-5505
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA. 92673
Contact: Darra Koger (949) 361-3138
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA. 90280
Contact: John Rico (323) 563-9594
Simi Valley Minor Street Rehabilitation
Contract Amount: $510,124.25
Start Date: 07/2019
End Date: 08/2019
Yerba Buena Area Resurfacing Project
Contract Amount: $3,919,808.95
Start Date: 06/2019
End Date: 12/2019
2019 Citywide Street Resurfacing
Contract Amount: $1,206,869.00
Start Date: 10/2019
End Date: 12/2019
Road Repair Service (Pothole Repair)
Contract Amount: $1,019,100.00
Start Date: 08/2019
End Date: 11/2019
Street Rehabilitation for S. Avenue LA
Esperanza
Contract Amount: $384,055.00
Start Date: 09/2019
End Date: 10/2019
Circle Park Driveway Project
Contract Amount: $268,576.00
Start Date: 06/2019
End Date: 09/2019
ko erD san-clemente.or
istrict|[email protected]
sshesheb simivalle .or
chris.so|is ventura.or

kalex drhorton.com
2019

PAST WORK REFERENCES
Pardee Homes
1250 Corona Pointe Court, Ste. 600
Corona, CA. 92879
Contact: Nick Lasher (951) 428-4442
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA. 92335
Contact: Kimberly Young (909) 350-7632
DR Horton
2280 Wardlow Circle Ste. 100
Corona, CA. 92880
Contact: Keith Alex (951) 830-5872
lrvine Community Development Company
550 Newport Center Dr. Ste. 550 B2
Newport Beach, CA. 92660
Contact: Mike Morse (949) 720-2560
City of Downey
11111 Brookshire Avenue
Downey, CA. 90241
Contact: Desi Gutierrez, (562) 904-7110
Railroad Canyon Widening
Contract Amount: $5,062,746.00
Start Date: 11/2018
End Time: 08/2019
Citrus Avenue Improvements
Contract Amount: $502,730.00
Start Date: 08/2018
End Date: 10/2019
Singlton Road
Contract Amount: $1,684,000.00
Start Date: 07/2018
End Date: 12/2019
Portola Springs PA-6 Enclave 5B Phase1, 2
Contract Amount: $2,055,055.00
Start Date: 09/2018
End Date: 12/2019
FY 18/19 Slurry Seal Project
Contract Amount: $313,425.87
Start Date: 06/2019
End Date: 12/2019
d utierr downe ca.or
nick.|asher ardeehomes.com
k oun fontana.or

vortiz coltonca. ov
2019

PAST WORK REFERENCES
City of Chino
PO Box 667
Chino, CA. 91708
Contact: Dustin Postovoit (909) 334-3415
City of Lancaster
44933 Fern Avenue
Lancaster, CA. 93534
Contact: Greg Wilson (661) 570-8003
City of Colton
650 N. La Cadena Dr.

Colton, CA. 92324
Contact: Victor Ortiz (909) 370-5099
City of Cathedral City
68700 Ave Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA. 92234
Contact: John A. Corella (760) 770-0349
City of San Clemente
910 Calle Negocio
San Clemente, CA. 92673
Contact: Gary Voborsky (949) 361-6132
Slurry Seal Maintenance Work
Contract Amount: $372,805.00
Start Date: 1/2019
End Date: 12/2019
2018 Pavement Management Program
Contract Amount: $2,720,103.65
Start Date: 3/2019
End Date: 12/2019
FY 18-19 Asphalt Paving Project
Contract Amount: $1,377,700.00
Start Date: 3/2019
End Date: 11/2019
Ortega Road Widening
Contract Amount: $459,998.00
Start Date: 2/2019
End Date: 12/2019
Arterial Street Pavement Maintenance
Contract Amount: $1,187,187.00
Start Date: 3/2019
End Date: 7/2019
voborskyg@san~c|emente.org
icorel|a@cathedra|city.gov
a ostovoit cit ofchino.or
wilsoné cit oflancastercaor

City of Moreno Valley Alessandro Blvd. Street Improvements at _ Chogall Court and Graham Street
14177 Frederick St.

Contract Amount: $445,821.50 P.O. Box 88005
Start: 05/2018 Moreno Valley, CA92552
Complete: 11/2018 Contact: Henry Ngo, P.E., (951)413-3106 H2018”
City ofJurupa Valley Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehab. PH2 8304 Limonite Avenue Suite M Contract Amount: $781,845.00 Jurupa Valley, CA92509 Start: 08/2018
City of AlisoViejo AlisoCreek and Road Rehab
12 Journey Street Ste #100 Contract Amount: $657,770.00 AlisoViejo, CA92656 Start: 05/2018
Contact: Mari Shakir, (949)425-2556 Complete: 10/2018
City of lrwindale rcor is irwinda|eCA. ov
5050 N. lrwindale Avenue lrwindale 2017-2018 Resurfacing Project Irwindale, CA91706 Contract Amount: $285,503.10
Contact: Richard Corpis, (626)430-2200 Start: 07/2018
Complete: 08/2018
Mshakir cit ofalisovie'o.com
Contact: Chase Keys, (951)332-6464 Complete: O9/
ckeys@iurupava||ey.org
heng[n@mova|.org

County of Los Angeles Pine Canyon Road
P.O. Box 7508 Contract Amount: $3,288,999.00
Alhambra, CA91802 Start: 06/2018
Contact: Hoda Hassan, (626)458-3144 Complete: 11/2018
"2018"
DAST
City of Huntington Beach Heil and Main Street
2000 Main Street Contract Amount: $2,285,562.00
Huntington Beach, CA92648 Start: 11/2017
Contact: Jim Escutia (714)536-5525 Finish: 06/2018
City of Rolling HillsEstates 2017-18 Street Resurfacing Project 4045 Palos Verdes Drive Contract Amount: $1,203,292.50
Rolling HillsEstates, CA90274 Start: 03/2018
Contact: Scott Gibson (909)210-0548 Finish:09/2018
City of Fontana Valley Blvd.Median Improvement Project
8353 Sierra Avenue Contract Amount: $164,715.00
Fontana, CA92335 Start: 03/2018
Contact: Jazmine Pena (909) 350-6648 Finish:
[email protected]
s ibson reen.com
iescutia@surfcity—hb.org
HHASSAN@dQw.|ac0unty.gov

City of Lake Forest Bake Parkway at Trabuco Road
25550 Commercentre Drive Contract Amount: $121,621.00
Lake Forest, CA92630 Start: 02/2018
Contact: Taylor Abernathy, (949)461-3490 Finish: 06/2018 {(2018)}
PAST
City of La Quinta FY16-17 Phase 2 Desert Club
74-495 CalleTampico Contract amount: $697,474.76
La Quinta, CA92253 Start date: 06/2017
Contact: Ubaldo Ayon Jr., (760)777-7051 Finish date 12/2017 City of Canyon Lake Slurry Seal FY2017-2018 Railroad Canyon/ _ Canyon Lake Drive
31516 Railroad Canyon Road
Contract amount: $263,241.63 Canyon Lake,CA92587
_ Start date: 03/2018 Contact: Kenneth Bailey, (951)244-2955 Finish date: 12/2018
City of Newport Beach West Coast Highway Landscape Improvements, _ Phase 1, Contract No. 7189-1
100 Civic Center Drive
Contract amount: $604,284.50 Newport Beach, CA92660
Start date: 06/2018 Contact: Alfred Castanon, (949) 644-3314 Finish date: 11/2019 ACastanon new ortbeachca. ov
kennethbaile caa rofessiona|s.com
uayon@_la—
tabernath Iakeforestca. ov

Town of Apple Valley Navajo Road Rehabilitation
14955 Dale Evans Parkway Contract amount: $849,182.00
Apple Valley, CA92307 Start date: 07/2017
Contact: Rich Berger, (760)240-7000 ext 7530 Finish date: 12/2017 ((2018))
City of Indian Wells Cook Street Rubberized Pavement Overlay 44-950 Eldorado Drive Contract amount: $599,599.59
Indian Wells, CA92210 Start date: 05/2018
Contact: Ken A. Seumalo, P.E., (760)346-2489, Finish date: 12/2018 kseumalo |ndianWells.com
rberger@agp|eval|ey.org

CITY OF NORCO

BID BOND
By:

Secretary/T re surer, M-Ch“! F2-
AllAmerican Asphalt - Corporation

CONTRACTOR
(CORPORATION) — TYPE
President, Ma-/t< 4-W"
FOR
FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT thatA|| American Asphalt
, as BIDDER, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland as
SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto THE CITY OF NORCO, as AGENCY, in the penal sum of Ten Percent of Total Amount Bid-—--- dollars ($ 10% of Bid ), which is 10 percent of the total amount bid by BIDDERto AGENCY forthe above stated project, for the payment ofwhich sum, BIDDER and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATIONARE SUCH that, whereas BIDDERis about to submit a bid to AGENCY for the above stated project, ifsaid bid is rejected, or ifsaid bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by BIDDER in the manner and time specified, then this obligation shall be null and void, othen/vise it shall remain in full force and effect in favor of AGENCY.

WITNESS our hands this 9th day of December , 2021
(seal)
cl
NOTE: SIGNATURE OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS MUST BE NOTARIZED Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,
Seal of Notary‘ ’l '
0 Pu
Bond No. 08597423
Bid Date: 12/15/2021

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certi?cate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validitv of that document. uommlsswn if LJJIIII MyComm.ExpiresNov20, 2024

RIGHT THUMBPRIN RIGHTTHUMBPRINT OF SIGNER OF SIGNER
State of California
County of Riverside
on December 14v2021 before me, Sarah Amanda Lan le Notar Public Date Here Insert name and Title of the Of?cer
personally appeared Mark Luer and Michael Farkas
Name(s) of Slgner(s)
9 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heilshe/they executed the same in hislher/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisilher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS hand and o cial seal.

Signatur Place Notary Seal Above Signature of No ary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document Bid Bond
Document Date: 12/09/2021 Number of Pages: 3
Signe?s) other Than Named Above; Rebecca Haas Bates-Attorney in Fact Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Mark Luer Signer’s Name: Michael Farkas
El Individual Individual
X Corporate Of?cer — Tit|e(s): President X Corporate Omcer _ Tme(S): secrete Partner I] III Limited General
B Atmmey i“ Fact El Attorney in Fact
Top of thumb here Top of thumb here
‘3 Trustee El Trustee D Other:

III Other:

El Partner Ll El Limited General
Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing:

AllAmerican AS halt AllAmerican As halt

SARAHAMANDALANGLEY
NotaryPublic- California
RiversideCounty
r-.._:--:-_ A RQIIQACC

SURETY’S NA|v||-‘_--TYpE; Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Corporation Mailing Address; 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900
BID BOND (PAGE 2)
Rebecca Haas-Bates
Name
Signature:

Title; Attorney-in-Fact
NOTE: SIGNATURE OF SURETY MUST BE NOTARIZED:

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this j day of ,
Seal of Notary; **Please See Attached**
Notary Public
P—
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(seal)

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVILCODE § 1189
xx-4:$<-:~:\<(=\<«.'-'=‘ 63;-:-:"-\‘\'{’:{<(c’<<./é?<4R<4R~:(£<<a£§:ai<6t<?i<&RMéi~:m<(aeta:.-aceaq?t/R:.2-\<?<e(:i<(:§.:€x<!R<.c\¢4Ex‘tc'.K A notary public or other officercompletingthis certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individualwho signed the documentto whichthis certi?cateis attached, and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validityofthat document.

State of California )
County of Oran 6 )
Qn 12/09/2021 befoye me’ Liliana Gomez, Notary Public
’ Date Here Insert Name and Titleof the Of?cer
personally appeared Rebecca Haas-Bates
Name(s).of Signer(s,l
I who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personts) whose name(s). is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/theirauthorized capacity(i‘ea),and that by his/her/their signatureIs).onthe instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTYOF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WlTNESS my hand and of?cial seal.

Signature
Signature of Notary ublic
Place Notary Seal Above

OPTIONAL
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date:12/09/2021 Number of Pages: Two (2) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: A11Amer1canAsPhalt Capacity?es) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name: Rebecca Haas-Bates Signer’s Name:

ElCorporate Officer —— Tltle(s): " Corporate Officer — Title(s):

Partner — [3 Limited ElGeneral II Partner — Limited ElGeneral I Individual E Attorney in Fact _. Individual ElAttorney in Fact E Trustee Guardian or Conservator 3 Trustee II Guardian or Conservator C Other: I Other:

Signer ls Representing: Signer ls Representing: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

LILIANAGOMEZ
Notary Public- Californi
Orange County a Commission# 2243326
MyComm. Expires May 20{2022
£

EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES
"Article V, Section 8, Attome s-in-Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attomeys-in-fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any of?cer or any such attomey-in-fact to af?x the corporate seal thereto; and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time."

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, Secretary of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certi?cate; and I do further certify that Article V, Section 8, of the ByLaws of the Companies is still in force.

This Power of Attorney and Certi?cate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998.

RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attomey...Any such Power or any certi?cate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attomey and Certi?cate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 10th day of May, 1990.

RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice-President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or herea?er, wherever appearing upon a certi?ed copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually af?xed.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and af?xed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this 9th day of December , 2021
GEO,‘ :__\’j;,,u-ao,%’,5 I _._. 3.0: (£35
By: Brian M. Hodges
Vice President

TO REPORT A CLAIM WITH REGARD TO A SURETY BOND, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION

OF THE CLAIM INCLUDING THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND, THE BOND NUMBER, AND YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION TO:

Zurich Surety Claims
1299 ZurichWay
Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056 www.re onsfclaims zurichna.com 800-626-4577

NON-COLLUSIONAFFIDAVI
Se , /4/7146/
. . SS
COUNTY OF Riverside
Edward J. Carlson _
, being first duly sworn deposes and
says that he is Vice President
(Sole Owner, Partner, President, etc.)
of AllAmerican Asphalt the party making the foregoing bid; that such bid is not made in the interest of or behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation, that such bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, that said BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding, that said BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly sought by agreements, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of said BIDDERor of any other bidder, or to fix the overhead, profit, or cost element of such bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract or anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in such bid are true, and further, that said BIDDERhas not, directly or indirectly submitted his bid price, or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid and willnot pay any fee in connection, organization, bid depository, or to any member or persons as have a partnership or other financial interest with said BIDDER in his general business.

Signed
Edward J. Carlson, Vice President
Title
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this __ day of ,
__
Seal of Not
Notary Public
P-9

STATE OF CALIFORNI

ZCALIFORNIA JURAT GOV CODE § 8202

SARAHAMANDALNGLEY
NotaryPublic- Ca?fornia
RiversideCounty I
Camn?sstan# 2337877 " MyComm.ExpiresNo 20, 2024 v

RIGHT THUMB-PRINT RIGHT THUMBPRIN

OF SIGNER T
Signature
Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Further Description of Any Attached Document
State of California
County of Riverside Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 14th day of December 2Q2_L
Date Month
By (1) Edward J. Carlson
Name of Signer ‘ Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence be the person who appeared before me (.) (,)
(and
(2)
Name of Signer
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
be the person who appeared before me.)
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: N/A
NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT Title or Type of Document Top of thumb here Top of thumb here Document Date: 12/13/2021 Number of Pages: 1
Signa ure of Notary Public

OF SIGNER
A notary public or other of?cer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certi?cate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

CITY OF NORCO

PROPOSAL BID SHEET
FOR
ITEM
FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT

QUANTITY UNIT WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN
245 ELT
8,250 SF
1 EA
1 EA

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT

PRICE IN

FIGURES
TOTAL

INWORDS
Application of Quick Set
Emulsion Aggregate Slurry
Type II(Cationic) with 2 ‘/2
Percent Latex Additive
including crack sealing, $ mobilization, demobilization, for public 320 streets at
74;“ 4[,_m_/mgZ2224-/,2
Per Extra Long Ton
$
Local Full Depth Pavement
Re airs at
11/4’ do I’ $ 5-so $ 4/5,
Per 375 Square Foot
Adjust Existing Water Valve
and Cover to Finished Surface
at re 0— ousanc/./f$ $
A‘; an dr / rs Pear Eqach3:300 3' 300
Adjust Existing Manhole and
Cover to Finished Surface at
r’-cc, 7?/{0d5aMd$ $ 3,300 $33M
/-ce u I" ’ 0” F5
Per Each
P-10

I
H F ;Lfa/ ?au_sg_d,E4¢r#v:/~:/

TOTAL BID AMOUNT
$ / 4'7 ‘/35. 00

TOTAL BID AMOUNT IN WORDS
6'/V2» //M//40’ o// e m
/04 I/& /

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN PRICE IN TOTAL

INWORDS FIGURES
Remove and Construct
Standard Rolled Curb Per City
of Norco Standard Drawing No.
$

5. 26 LF 205 at $
i_ 350 61,340 I 4/5 and AM
5 Per Each
Thermoplastic Striping &
Pavement Markers for Public
1 Streets at

6. LS &en7/Aw54/245?gen $ $
dd //412$ ’7700
Per Lump Sum ’ 1’700
AllAmerican Asphalt
951-736-7600
Bidder's Name and Telephone Number
NOTE: The unit price must be written in words and also shown in figures. The total price must be extended for each item of work, and the total of all items inserted in the space provided.

P-11
/‘I V

Subscribed and sworn to this day of

PROPOSAL
INWITNESS WHEREOF, BIDDERexecutes and submits this proposal with the names, titles, hands, and seals of all forenamed principals this ___'_ day of December , 21 Edward J. Carlson, Vice President
Michael Farkas, Secretary
Mark Luer, President
By
Title
AGENCYacknowledges that this proposal was received and opened at the time and in the place specified, and that it was accompanied by the required guarantee in the amount of 10 percent of the total bid.

NOTARY PUBLI
Title
BIDDE

CALIFORNIA JURAT GOV CODE § 8202
Top of thumb here Top of thumb here
Signatur
Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Further Description of Any Attached Document
Signature of Notary Public
State of California
County of Riverside Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 14th day of December 2021,
Date Month
By (1) Michael Farkas
Name of Signer
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
be the person who appeared before me (.) (,)
(and
(2) M rk Luer
Name of Signer
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
be the person who appeared before me.)

SARAHAMANDALNGLEY
NotaryPublic- Califnrnia
RiversideCounty
Commission# 2337877
MyComm.ExpiresNov20, 2024
Title or Type of Document Proposal
Document Date: 12/14/2021 Number of Pages:

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: N/A

RIGHTTHUMBPRIN

OF SIGNER

RIGHTTHUMBPRINT OF SIGNER
A notary public or other officer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certi?cate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

ZCALIFORNIA JURAT GOV CODE § 8202

SARAHAMANDALANGLEY
NotaryPublic- California
r'..._..I..:..- u ‘ass-luv-I ‘
2024
RiversideCounty

RIGHT THUMBPRINT RIGHT THUMBPRIN

OF SIGNER
Top of thumb here Top of thumb here
Signatur
Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and realtachment of this form to another document.

Further Description of Any Attached Document
Signature of No ary Public
State of California
County of Riverside Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 14th day of Decemb r 2112
1 Date Month
By (1) Edward J. Carlson
Name of Signer
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
be the person who appeared before me (.) (,)
(and
(2)
Name of Signer
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
be the person who appeared before me.)
Title or Type of Document Proposal
Document Date: 12/14/2021 Number of Pages: 1
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: N/A
L|11lIvllI3)lUll? LJJIOII -
‘Y MyComm.ExpiresNov20,

OF SIGNER
A notary public or other officer completing this certi?cate veri?es only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certi?cate is attached, and not the truth?llness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

CA-1

CITY OF NORCO
FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT

AGREEMENT

1. Parties and Date.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 19th day of January, 2022 by and between the City of Norco, a municipal corporation of the State of California, located at 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860, County of Riverside, State of California, (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and All American Asphalt, a corporation with its principal place of business at 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA 92879 (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

2. Recitals.

2.1 Contractor.

Contractor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provisions of the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Contractor represents that it is experienced in constructing street pavement improvements for public clients, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the Services in the State of California, and that is familiar with the plans of the City.

2.2 Project.

The City desires to engage the Contractor to render such services for the FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Contractor promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to construct the improvements outlined by the Project. The Project is more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Project shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The terms of this Agreement shall begin at the Notice to Proceed and shall extend 20 working days. Contractor shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2 Responsibilities of Contractor.

3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Project shall be constructed by Contractor or under its supervision. Contractor will determine the means, methods and details of constructing the Project subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Contractor on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

CA-2
Any additional personnel constructing the Project under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with the construction of the Project under this Agreement and as required by law.

Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Contractor shall construct the Project expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Project timeframe set forth herein.

Contractor represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to construct the Project in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Contractor’s conformance with the Project timeframe, City shall respond to Contractor’s Requests for Information in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Contractor shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Project timeframe.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the Director of Public Works, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.5 Contractor’s Representative. Contractor hereby designates Edward J.

Carlson–Vice President, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Contractor’s Representative”). Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. The Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Project, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Project under this Agreement.

3.2.6 Coordination of Project. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the construction of the Project and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.7 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Contractor shall construct the Project under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to construct the Project. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to construct the Project. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to construct the Project, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Contractor or its subcontractors who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the

CA-3
adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to construct the Project in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Contractor and shall not be re-employed to perform any work on the Project.

3.2.7.1 Period of Performance and Liquidated Damages. Contractor shall perform and complete the Project under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section 3.1.2 above (“Term”). Contractor shall construct the Project in strict accordance with any timeframe provided herein, or which may be provided separately in writing to the Contractor. Contractor agrees that if the Project is not completed within the aforementioned Term and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule or Project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum of $1000.00 per working day:

3.2.8 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Project. If the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.9 Insurance.

Throughout the life of this Contract, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A- VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) as may be authorized in writing by City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Contract) with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$5,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury $10,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations $10,000,000 general aggregate

CA-4
(ii) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, and include coverage for all owned, hired, and non owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1 Any Auto) with limits of liability of not less than $5,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(iii) WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required under the California Labor Code.
(iv) EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY insurance with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 disease policy limit and $1,000,000 disease each employee.
(v) BUILDERS RISK (Course of Construction) insurance in an amount equal to the completed value of the project with no coinsurance penalty provisions. (Only required if the project includes new construction of a building; or renovation of, or addition to, an existing building.)
(vi) CONTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY (Unless waived in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is required for all environmental and water remediation work and for all work transporting fuel. Unless waived in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is also required for demolition, renovation, HVAC, plumbing or electrical (including, without limitation, lighting) work on any structure built prior to the year 1990.) insurance with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$5,000,000 per occurrence or claim
$10,000,000 general aggregate per annual policy period
In the event Contractor purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the minimum limits of insurance set forth above, this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).

Should this Contract involve any lead based, mold or asbestos environmental hazard, either the Automobile Liability insurance policy or the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include Transportation Pollution Liability insurance covering materials to be transported by Contractor pursuant to the Contract.

In the event this Contract involves any lead-based environmental hazard (e.g., lead based paint), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for lead based environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any asbestos environmental hazard (e.g., asbestos remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for asbestos environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any mold environmental hazard (e.g., mold remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for mold environmental hazards and “microbial matter including mold” within the definition of “Pollution” under the policy.

Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion. At the option of the City Manager or

CA-5
his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its officers, officials, employees and agents; or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or selfinsured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form. The Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be written on either an occurrence form, or a claims-made form. The General Liability (including ongoing operations and completed operations), Automobile Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policies shall name City, its officers, officials, employees and agents as an additional insured. All such policies of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The Builders Risk (Course of Construction) insurance policy shall be endorsed to name the City as a loss payee. Any Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The coverage(s) shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. If Contractor maintains higher limits of liability than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor.

Claims-Made Policies - If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage form:
(i) The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Contract or the commencement of work by Contractor.
(ii) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iii) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Contract, or work commencement date, Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iv) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review. (v) These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract.

Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and

CA-6
approved by the City’s Risk Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion prior to City’s execution of the Contract and before work commences. Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Contract, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Contract.

If at any time during the life of the Contract or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Contract shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Contract. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Contract.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Contract. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

In the event of a partial or total destruction by the perils insured against of any or all of the work and/or materials herein provided for at any time prior to the final completion of the Contract and the final acceptance by the City of the work or materials to be performed or supplied thereunder, the Contractor shall promptly reconstruct, repair, replace, or restore all work or materials so destroyed or injured at his/her sole cost and expense. Nothing herein provided for shall in any way excuse the Contractor or his/her insurance company from the obligation of furnishing all the required materials and completing the work in full compliance with the terms of the Contract.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Contract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors' certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

3.2.10 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In constructing the Project, the Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or

CA-7
injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.11 Bonds.

3.2.11.1 Performance Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Performance Bond in the amount of the total, not-to-exceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by the City.

3.2.11.2 Payment Bond. Contractor shall execute and
provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Payment Bond in the amount of the total, notto-exceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by City.

3.2.11.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in City’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the affected bond within 10 days of receiving notice from City. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the City, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least ten (10) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Agreement until any replacement bonds required by this section are accepted by the City. To the extent, if any, that the total compensation is increased in accordance with the Agreement, the Contractor shall, upon request of the City, cause the amount of the bonds to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the City. To the extent available, the bonds shall further provide that no change or alteration of the Agreement (including, without limitation, an increase in the total compensation, as referred to above), extensions of time, or modifications of the time, terms, or conditions of payment to the Contractor, will release the surety. If the Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.11.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted.

The surety must be a California admitted surety with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII and satisfactory to the City. If a California admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all construction services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Extra work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Contractor. The statement shall describe

CA-8
the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Contractor perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Contractor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City’s Representative.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Contractor, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Contractor of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Contractor shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Contractor shall be entitled to no further compensation. Contractor may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

CA-9

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the follow address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Contractor:

All American Asphalt
400 East Sixth Street
Corona, CA 92879
Attention: Edward J. Carlson – Vice President
City:

City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: Director of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.4 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.5 Indemnification. To the furthest extent allowed by law including California Civil Code section 2782, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage) incurred by City, Contractor or any other person, and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees and litigation expenses), arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of performance of this Contract. Contractor's obligations under the preceding sentence shall apply regardless of whether City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers are passively negligent, but shall not apply to any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs or

CA-10
damages caused by the active or sole negligence, or the willful misconduct, of City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed under this Contract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Contract.

3.5.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.

3.5.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.5.9 City’s Right to Employ Other Contractors. City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

3.5.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.5.11 Assignment or Transfer. Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.5.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be work days (Monday through Friday, excluding holidays). All references to Contractor include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Contractor, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

3.5.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.5.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

CA-11

3.5.15 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.5.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5.17 Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services.

For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.5.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Contractor shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.5.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.5.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.5.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.6 Subcontracting.

3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

CA-12
Name of Contractor: All American Asphalt
*By:
__________________________
Signature
Edward J. Carlson
Vice President
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS MUST BE NOTARIZED.

Attach Certificate of Notary Acknowledgement
OWNER: CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation
*By:
__________________________
Greg Newton
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
John R. Harper, City Attorney

CA-13

EXHIBIT A
Scope of FY 2021-2022 Slurry Seal Project
The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as required by the Contract Documents, Specifications and Plans for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of application of slurry seal, including crack seal, localized full depth pavement repairs and the installation of striping and pavement markings to the satisfaction and acceptance of the City Engineer.

The services shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book), latest edition, including all current supplements, addenda, and revisions thereof (hereinafter referred to as “Standard Specifications”) incorporated herein by this reference. Any provisions which supplement or modify the Standard Specifications are attached hereto as Special Provisions and incorporated herein by this reference.

CA-14

EXHIBIT B
Proposal Document

CA-15

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Obligee”) has awarded to ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ (hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement for the work described as follows:

FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of application of slurry seal, including crack seal, localized full depth pavement repairs and the installation of striping and pavement markings to the satisfaction and acceptance of the City Engineer.
.
(hereinafter referred to as the “Public Work”); and
WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in that certain contract for the said Public Work dated ___________________, (hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”), which Contract is incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract to perform the terms thereof and to provide a bond both for the performance and guaranty thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, ____________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and ____________________________________ ________________________________, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of____________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco in the sum of ______________________________________________________ Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its parts, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified,

CA-16
and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the one year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and indemnify and save harmless the Obligee, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with enforcement of the bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this ____ day of _________, 2022.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
SURETY:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
Attorney-in-Fact
The rate of premium on this bond is _________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $_____________________________________

CA-17
(The above must be filled in by corporate surety).

IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ________________________________ ________________________________
________________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or ________________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if ________________________________ different from above)
________________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and ________________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California) ________________________________ ________________________________

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On this ____ day of ___________, in the year _________, before me, ______________________, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared

CA-18
____________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the _________________________ (Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the ______________________________ (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact.

Notary Public in and for said State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:______________________________
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

CA-19

PAYMENT BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as Obligee” has awarded to ____________________________________________________________ __________________________________(hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement dated________________________________, described as follows:

FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of application of slurry seal, including crack seal, localized full depth pavement repairs and the installation of striping and pavement markings to the satisfaction and acceptance of the City Engineer. (hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”) and
WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said Contract and pursuant to Section 3247 of the California Civil Code; NOW, THEREFORE, We, _______________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal; and __________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco and to any and all persons, companies, or corporations entitled to file stop notices under Section 3181 of the California Civil Code, in the sum of
________________________________________________________________Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms of the said Contract, for which payment will and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if said Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, or Subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, implements, machinery, or power used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public Work contracted to be done, or to pay any person for any work or labor of any kind, or for bestowing skills or other necessary services thereon, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and

CA-20
paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of paid Contractor and his Subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor as required by the provisions of Section 3247 through 3252 of the Civil Code, the Surety or Sureties hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In addition to the provisions herein above, it is agreed that this bond will insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to serve stop notices under Section 3181 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or additions to the terms of the said Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor hereunder shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _____day of_______________, 2022.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
SURETY:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Attorney-in-Fact
The rate of premium on this bond is ________________________ per thousand.

CA-21
The total amount of premium charged: $ _____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate Surety).

IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) _______________________________ _______________________________
_______________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or _______________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if _______________________________ different from above)
_______________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and _______________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California _______________________________ _______________________________

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On this ________ day of _________________, in the year _________, before me,

CA-22
________________________, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared _____________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the _____ ___________________ (Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the _________________________________ (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact.
_____________________________________
Notary Public in and for said State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:________________________
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

CA-23

GENERAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From) _______________ (To)________________ Endorsement Effective Date ______________________________________

3. Named Insured _______________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured
_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________________ /_____________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention (Nil unless otherwise specified):
______________________________________________

7. Coverage is equivalent to:

Comprehensive General Liability Form GL0002 (Ed. 1/73)
______________________________________________
Commercial General Liability “Occurrence” Form CG0001
______________________________________________

8. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Coverage is:
____________________________________”occurrence”
Note: The City of Norco standard insurance requirements specify “occurrence” coverage. “Claims-made” coverage is not acceptable. If commercial general liability form or equivalent is used, the general aggregate must apply separately to this location/project or the general aggregate must be twice the occurrence limit.

CA-24

9. Description of Project:

FY 2021-2022 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of application of slurry seal, including crack seal, localized full depth pavement repairs and the installation of striping and pavement markings to the satisfaction and acceptance of the City Engineer.

B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. As respects any work performed on the above described Project, the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased, or used by the Named Insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the Named Insured on the above described Project for or on behalf of the City of Norco; or (b) products sold by the Named Insured to the City of Norco for use on the Project; or (c) premises leased by the Named Insured from the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s schedule underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73), Comprehensive General Liability Insurance and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability endorsement; or
(2) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, “Occurrence” Form CG 0001; or

CA-25
(3) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Sections (1) and (2).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respects to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
______________________________
(Telephone Number)

CA-26
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________________________

CA-27

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #_____________________

1. Insurance Company _____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From)________________(To) _______________ Endorsement Effective Date ___________

3. Named Insured________________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________ /_____________________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention
(Nil unless otherwise specified):
$____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. The City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers, employees and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this

CA-28
policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers; or (b) stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 (“any auto”) and endorsement CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Section (1).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

CA-29
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
____________________________________________________
(Telephone Number)
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________

CA-30
WORKER’S COMPENSATION/EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ (“the Company”)
Policy Number _________________________________________________

2. Effective Date of this Endorsement ________________________________

3. Named Insured_________________________________________________

4. Employer’s Liability Limit (Coverage B)______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premium and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
(1) Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.
(2) Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the City of Norco.

CA-31
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, _______________________, warrant that I have authority to bind (Print/Type Name)
the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: ____________________________________________________ TITLE: ____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: ____________________________________________________

CA-32

CA-33

CA-34

CA-35

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2022 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Ordinance No. 1078, Second Reading: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Norco, California approving Zone Amendment 2021-04
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1078, Second Reading, approving Zone Amendment 2021-04, a proposal to add the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) Zone on property generally located at the southeast intersection of Second and River Road, consisting of four parcels totaling 14.57 acres (APNs 119-020-015, -021, -022 and -023) and with an underlying commercial-general (C-G) Zoning designation.

SUMMARY:

The First Reading of Ordinance No. 1078 was held on January 5, 2022, and was adopted by the City Council. Ordinance No. 1078 approving Zone Amendment 2021-04, a proposal to add the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) Zone on property generally located at the southeast intersection of Second and River Road, consisting of four parcels totaling 14.57 acres (APNs 119-020-015, -021, -022 and -023) and with an underlying commercial-general (C-G) Zoning designation.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Adopting the Ordinance to protect the health, welfare and safety of the Community is consistent with Community Outreach Strategic Directive #2.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance 1078

ORDINANCE 1078

AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE AMENDMENT 2021-04,

A PROPOSAL TO ADD THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
(HDO) ZONE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE

SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF SECOND AND RIVER ROAD,
CONSISTING OF FOUR PARCELS TOTALING 14.57 ACRES (APNs
119-020-015, -021, -022 AND -023) AND WITH AN UNDERLYING

COMMERCIAL-GENERAL (C-G) ZONING DESIGNATION
WHEREAS, the CITY OF NORCO initiated Zone Change 2021-04 for the addition of the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) Zone, on property generally located at the southeast intersection of Second Street and River Road, consisting of four parcels totaling 14.57 acres, with the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers of 119-020-015, -021, -022 and -023; and WHEREAS, the Zone Change was duly submitted to said City’s Planning Commission for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Zone Change was scheduled for public hearing on December 8, 2021 on or about 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and WHEREAS, at the said time and place, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to the Zone Change; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2021-39 recommending that the City Council approve Zone Change 2021-04; and
WHEREAS, Zone Change 2021-04 was duly submitted to said City’s, City Council for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and WHEREAS, Zone Change 2021-04 was scheduled for public hearing on January 5, 2022 on or about 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and WHEREAS, at the time set, the City Council held a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to Zone Change 2021-04; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2021, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (SCH # 2021080283) (Adopted Negative Declaration) which was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., CEQA), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §§ 15000, et seq., CEQA Guidelines), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines. The City of Norco is acting as the Lead Agency. The Adopted Negative Declaration evaluated the environmental impacts of including Assessor’s Parcel Numbers of 119-020-015, -021, -022 and, -023 as housing sites in the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and applying the HDO zone to the sites and determined significant impacts would not occur. Since no changes and additions to the Adopted Negative Declaration

Ordinance 1078 - Zone Amendment 2021-04
January 19, 2022

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby approve the following FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS:

I. FINDINGS:

A. The proposed Zone Change is necessary and desirable for the development of the community in harmony with the objective of the General Plan.

B. The proposed Zone Change will be compatible and complementary to existing conditions in the surrounding area.

C. With the proposal, to add the HDO’s, the site is adequate in size to accommodate uses permitted in the zone requested (which is the existing undying zone), and all applicable property development standards can be complied with.

D. The site properly relates to streets and highways designed and fully improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic that is expected to be generated in this area; and that utilities exist or are planned which will adequately serve the property as rezoned to add the HDO.

E. The proposed zoning amendments would not result in the reduction of allowed residential density or intensity of land uses, consistent with SB 330. The City currently has a total of 56.3 acres of Housing Development Overlay (HDO zoning and after the zone changes are implemented, the Housing Development Overlay will consist of 57.8 acres.

F. On October 6, 2021, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (SCH # 2021080283) (Adopted Negative Declaration) which was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., CEQA), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §§ 15000, et seq., CEQA Guidelines), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines. The City of Norco is acting as the Lead Agency. The Adopted Negative Declaration evaluated the environmental impacts of including Assessor’s Parcel Numbers of 119-020-015, -021, -022 and, -023 as housing sites in the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and applying the HDO zone to the sites and determined significant impacts would not occur. Since no changes and additions to the Adopted Negative Declaration are necessary to address Zone Change 2021-04 and no circumstances exist calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162 and 15163, further environmental review is not required, and the Project is within the scope of the Adopted Negative Declaration.

Ordinance 1078 - Zone Amendment 2021-04
January 19, 2022

II. DETERMINATION:

NOW THEREFORE, in light of the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing, and in conformity with the findings set forth here, the City Council for the City of Norco, assembled January 5, 2022, does hereby adopt said Ordinance approving Zone Amendment 2021-04 and does hereby approve as follows:

SECTION 1: Amending the zoning map to apply the Housing Development Overlay (HDO) on parcels generally located at the southeast intersection of Second Street and River Road, consisting of four parcels totaling 14.57 acres, with the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers of 119-020-015, -021, -022 and 023.

SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after final passage thereof.

SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase, hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4: POSTING: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall cause the same within 15 days of its passage to be posted at no less than five public places within the City of Norco.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held January 19, 2021.
_______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Ordinance 1078 - Zone Amendment 2021-04
January 19, 2022

I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on January 5, 2022 and thereafter at a regular meeting of said City Council duly held on January 19, 2022, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on January 19, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2022 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Michelle Anglin, Community Services Director Department: Parks, Recreation and Community Services
SUBJECT:

Approval of the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan for facilities, programs and services regarding compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2022-06 approving the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan for public facilities, programs and services regarding compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

SUMMARY:

In July of 2020, City Council approved a process to provide a self-evaluation review of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that was enacted in July 1990 and became effective January 1992. The Self-Evaluation was a two-part program; the first part provided a review of all public facility facilities and parks identifying barriers to access to be corrected by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) and the creation of a Transition Plan that will provide multi-year process for implementation. The second part evaluated programs, services and communication and provided a plan for implementation to meet ADA requirements. The resulting Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan is a fluid roadmap for the City to take corrective measures over the course of time to be ADA compliant in the areas of facilities, programming and communication to best serve all persons. This Plan is required to be approved by the City Council.

BACKGROUND:

In July of 2020, City Council approved a process to provide a self-evaluation review of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that was enacted in July 1990 and became effective January 1992. The Self-Evaluation was a two-part program; the first part provided a review of all public facilities and parks identifying barriers with the creation of a Transition Plan that will provide multi-year corrective measures. The second part looked at programs, services and communication and provided a plan for implementation to meet ADA requirements.

The ADA requires the City to provide equal opportunities to all individuals. The ADA does not require equal treatment, which can in fact lead to discrimination against individuals with disabilities. To avoid discrimination, the City will need to remediate any deficiencies noted to ensure individuals with disabilities enjoy equal access to programs, services and facilities.

On November 18, 2020, the City of Norco entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Miller Architectural Corporation (ADA Consultant) for work related to ADA Evaluation and Transition Plan. The general scope of work performed by the service provider included project management, public outreach and meetings, an ADA Self-Evaluation, physical barrier surveys and reports, inventory database and mapping, ADA SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan reports, City staff training, and on-call ADA support as needed.

The methodology used in developing the ADA Program Accessibility - Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan was undertaken by the City of Norco, through the ADA Consultant, to evaluate its current programs, services, policies and practices to determine if they are consistent with the full participation of individual with disabilities and with the requirements of state and federal accessibility laws. This was accomplished primarily through a 10- page self evaluation survey tool which was completed by 20 key managers, directors, supervisors, program staff and administrators. The self evaluation provided staff the ability to recognize the areas of programs, services or events which may need to be modified or changed in order to become more accessible to individuals with disabilities.

As part of the public process, the Parks and Recreation Commission held a Public Meeting Workshop on Monday, November 22, 2021 in which the Commission, staff and the public received a presentation from the consultant team regarding the City SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan. The workshop allowed Commission members to review recommendations and findings from the self-evaluation team for public facilities, programs and services. The workshop was an open discussion and allowed the consultant to hear from the Commission as well as to take public comments. However, there were no public comments on the matter.

On December 1, 2021, the City Council held a Public Meeting Workshop which included an overview of the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan by Miller Architectural Corporation and the consultant team. Similar to the Commission Public Meeting Workshop, the City Council Public Meeting Workshop was an open discussion and allowed the consultant to hear from the Council as well as to take public comments.

However, there were no public comments on the matter.

The proposed Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan is a fluid roadmap for the City to take corrective measures over the course of years to be ADA compliant in the areas of facilities, programming and communication to best serve the public. Although the Consultants have identified the corrective measures and have prioritized the items to be addressed, this schedule can be modified at any time, based on the needs of the community, capital projects implementation, ease of implementation and availability of resources. Once approved, staff will move forward and create a process to implement the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact for City Council approval of the Transition Plan. Once the Transition Plan is approved, costs to implement the various recommendations will be included in the appropriate CIP and Operating Budgets as applicable.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan is consistent with Strategic Plan Directive #2:

Community Outreach - Engage with the community through excellent customer service, communication and programs.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No 2022-06

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SELF-EVALUATION AND

TRANSITION PLAN FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES, PROGRAMS, AND

SERVICES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
WHEREAS, Title II of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to State and local government entities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco has an obligation under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, to protects qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in services programs and activities provided by State and local government entities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Miller Architectural Corporation and their team to complete an ADA Evaluation and Transition Plan that provides a review of all public assets and barriers for correction and the creation of a transition plan that will provide multi-year process for correction; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2021, the City Council reviewed the proposed SelfEvaluation and Transition Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make provisions for a level of service commensurate with the needs of the disabled community and mandated federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the City Council adopted the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Norco, California, approve and adopt the 2022 Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. #

Resolution No. 2022-06 – 2022 Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan

January 19, 2022
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on January 19, 2022.
______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on January 19, 2021, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on January 19, 2022.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2022 Agenda Item:

6.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Prepared By: Chad Blais, Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Adoption of the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolution No. 2022-07, adopting the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP)
SUMMARY:

Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) requires all medium- and highpriority groundwater basins to be managed by a Groundwater Sustainability Agency and prepare a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). The Temescal Basin GSP was prepared in concert with other agencies in the Temescal Basin and in consideration of input from local stakeholders. Through this resolution the City will formally adopt the Temescal Basin GSP recognizing the City of Corona as the lead agency of the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA). The GSP has been prepared in compliance with the SGMA and with guidance from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR).

BACKGROUND:

On September 16, 2014, the Governor signed a three-bill package, known collectively as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), into law that established a new structure for sustainable groundwater management. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act went into effect on January 1, 2015. SGMA requires all medium- and high-priority groundwater basins, as designated by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bulletin 118, to be managed by a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) or multiple GSAs. The Temescal Basin GSA was created consisting of the City of Corona, City of Norco, and the Home Gardens County Water District. Through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the City of Corona accepted the responsibility to develop a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Temescal Basin, a mediumpriority groundwater basin (see attached report).

The City of Corona issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for GSP development in November 2019. The RFP was awarded to Todd Groundwater and approved by the Corona City Council on May 20, 2020. The approved proposal included two subconsultants, Carollo Engineers and Kearns & West. Todd Groundwater was the lead consultant assisting the City of Corona in preparing a GSP for the Temescal Basin. The City of Corona has been working with Todd Groundwater since May 2020 to prepare a GSP for the Temescal Basin. The GSP has been prepared to be consistent with SGMA, using guidance from DWR, and input from local stakeholders.

Public Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement
The Temescal Basin GSP preparation was a transparent process where stakeholders and the public were invited to participate and comment throughout its creation. A dedicated Temescal Basin groundwater webpage was created, hosted by the City of Corona. The webpage was updated with meeting dates/times, registration links, meeting presentations, meeting summaries, and drafts of the GSP chapters as they became available. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was formed from select neighboring agencies and local stakeholders. The TAC members included:
• City of Corona – Utilities Department
• City of Corona – Council Members
• Home Gardens County Water District
• City of Norco
• Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Santa Ana Region 8 • All American Asphalt
• 3M Industrial Mineral Products Division
Four TAC meetings were held on April 19, 2020, November 18, 2020, February 17, 2021, and June 16, 2021. TAC members received presentations on SGMA, groundwater conditions in the Temescal Basin, draft plans for continued sustainable management of the Basin, and drafts of GSP chapters as they were created to review and provide feedback to the Temescal Basin GSA and the consultant team.

The Temescal Basin GSA also hosted public workshops where anyone interested in the Temescal Basin GSP could attend, comment, and/or ask questions. Three Public Workshops were held on September 29, 2020, March 2, 2021, and July 8, 2021. The public workshops were open to the public. In order to promote participation, the Temescal Basin GSA maintained an open-enrollment “Interested Parties List” that was used to distribute information regarding meeting dates, times, and availability of GSP component drafts. All meetings were held virtually via Zoom, and were simultaneously broadcasted on YouTube, Facebook, and Corona’s public broadcast cable channel. The Public Workshops were all led in English while simultaneously translated to Spanish. Viewers who wished to view meetings in Spanish could do so via a “Spanish room” option within the Zoom platform.

Additional outreach included distribution of public information fliers in both English and Spanish and targeted outreach meetings to local community leaders and community advocacy groups.

Basin Setting

The Temescal Basin is bound on the west by the Santa Ana Mountains and the east by low-lying El Sobrante de San Jacinto and La Sierra Hills and it is adjacent to the Bedford Coldwater, Chino, and Riverside-Arlington Sub-basins of the Upper Santa Ana Groundwater Basin and the Coastal Plain of the Orange County Basin.

The Temescal Basin is located within one of the structural blocks of the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California. The Basin occurs in a linear low-lying block, referred to as the Elsinore-Temecula trough, that extends from Corona to the southeast some 30 miles and was formed along an extensive northwest-southeast trending fault zone including the Elsinore, Chino, and related faults.

The basin-fill alluvial deposits and, to some extent, the underlying sedimentary units make up the aquifers in the Basin. Three aquifer packages provide water supply to wells in the Basin: the Channel Aquifer, the Alluvial Fan aquifers, and, to a lesser extent, consolidated sandstone aquifers. Of these three aquifers, the Channel Aquifer is the only principal aquifer as it is the most productive aquifer and provides most of the groundwater supply in the Basin.

Groundwater Conditions
Water levels in the Channel Aquifer vary in response to wet and dry hydrologic cycles.

Increased pumping and prolonged drought have resulted in a slight decline in water levels over the past twenty years. Groundwater levels reached their respective highs in the early 1980s in response to a wet hydrologic cycle that began in 1978. The lowest groundwater levels generally correspond to dry periods and periods of increased pumping, though the responses throughout the Basin are not uniform.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and nitrates are the primary water quality constituents of concern in the Basin. Groundwater in the Basin is somewhat mineralized, with high TDS concentrations in many monitored wells. Groundwater in the Basin has been impacted by human activities both in the Basin and watershed including agricultural, urban, and industrial land uses. Elevated nitrate concentrations have been documented in the Basin since, at least, the 1950s.

Water Budget
A water balance (or water budget) is a quantitative tabulation of all inflows, outflows, and storage change of a hydrologic system. This GSP contains a detailed water balance for both the groundwater system and surface water system of the Basin. The water budgets were developed for time periods representing historical, current, future no project (baseline), and future growth plus climate change conditions. The two future scenarios were simulated to test sustainability, and both showed sustainable conditions in the future.

Sustainable Management Criteria
The sustainable management goal of the Temescal Basin is to sustain groundwater resources for the current and future beneficial uses of the Basin in a manner that is adaptive and responsive to the following objectives:
• Provide a long-term, reliable, and efficient groundwater supply for municipal, industrial, and other uses;
• Provide reliable storage for water supply resilience during droughts and shortages;

• Protect groundwater quality;
• Support beneficial uses of interconnected surface waters; and • Support integrated and cooperative water resource management.

This goal is consistent with SGMA and is based on information from other aspects of the GSP.

A GSP must develop quantitative sustainability criteria for all applicable sustainability indicators that allow the Temescal Basin GSA to define, measure, and track the progress of sustainable management of the Temescal Basin. These criteria include the following:
• Undesirable Result – significant and unreasonable conditions for any of the six sustainability indicators which are groundwater level declines, groundwater storage reductions, land subsidence, degradation groundwater quality, seawater intrusion, and depletion of interconnected surface water (including impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems).
• Minimum Threshold (MT) – numeric value used to define undesirable results for each sustainability indicator.
• Measurable Objective (MO) – specific, quantifiable goal to track the performance of sustainable management.

The sustainability indicators and sustainable management criteria are clearly defined and provide a quantitative analysis of the Basin’s sustainability. As the Basin has been managed without significant undesirable results, the sustainability criteria are defined to avoid future undesirable results.

Monitoring Network
The monitoring network for GSP implementation has been established to document groundwater and related surface conditions as relevant to the sustainability indicators, MTs, and MOs. The components of the monitoring network are built from existing programs and will be carried out by the Temescal GSA. The monitoring network comprises a set of existing wells in which groundwater elevations and water quality parameters have been measured historically and will continue to be measured in the future. There are currently 27 existing wells in which groundwater elevation has and will be monitored. Many of these wells are also used for monitoring groundwater quality, along with other water supply and water quality monitoring wells in the Temescal Basin.

Additional monitoring wells may be added to the network in the future as necessary. The GSP includes plans to add several shallow wells for monitoring interconnected surface water conditions in the southern part of the Prado management zone.

Projects and Management Actions
During the preparation of the GSP, the Temescal Basin GSA identified five specific management actions (Actions) and three projects (Projects) to achieve the sustainability goal. The Actions are generally focused on data collection, storage and reporting of information necessary to monitor sustainability, and assessment of when Actions may be necessary (i.e., when MTs are approached or exceeded). The projects are generally designed to reduce uncertainty in areas where data gaps have been identified during development of the GSP. These projects and management actions are aimed at achieving sustainability goals and responding to changing conditions in the Basin.

GSP Implementation
The official adoption of the GSP by the Temescal Basin GSA will initiate Plan implementation. After submittal of the GSP to DWR, and during the DWR review period, the Temescal Basin GSA will continue to communicate with stakeholders via the City of Corona’s website and begin implementing the projects and management actions described in the GSP. The Plan will be implemented to sustainably manage groundwater in the Basin under the authority of the Temescal Basin GSA and its member agencies.

The Temescal Basin GSA is required to submit an annual report to DWR by April 1st of each year following adoption of the GSP. The first annual report will be due in April of 2022. The Temescal Basin GSA has committed to implementing the GSP upon adoption and completing the projects and management actions necessary to monitor and maintain sustainability within the first five years of initiation of the GSP.

The Temescal Basin GSP is presented in draft form to allow for modifications based on public comments during the public hearing portion of the Council meeting. Norco must adopt the attached Resolution 2022-07 approving the Temescal Basin GSP and said Resolution will be included with the final GSP submitted to DWR as a final document.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City of Corona has agreed to fund the cost related to annual reporting requirements.

Because Norco does not currently produce water from the Temescal Basin, there are no initial costs related to Norco's participation in the GSP. However, Norco's future costs as part of the GSP will be revaluated at such time the City of Norco actually produces water from the Temescal Basin.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Adoption of the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan is consistent with Strategic Direction #1 - Establish funding for planning, maintenance, replacement and development of infrastructure.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Lisette Free, Finance Director Approved by: Andy Okoro, City Manager
Approved as to Form: John Harper, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2022-07
Temescal Basin GSP

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-07

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2022 TEMESCAL BASIN

GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
WHEREAS, On September 16, 2014, the Governor signed a three-bill package, known collectively as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), into law that establishes a new structure for groundwater management; and WHEREAS, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 went into effect on January 1, 2015; and
WHEREAS, SGMA requires all medium- and high-priority groundwater basins, as designated by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bulletin 118, to be managed by a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) or multiple GSAs; and
WHEREAS, Water Code Section 10723.6 authorizes a combination of local agencies overlying a groundwater basin to elect to become a GSA by using a memorandum of agreement or other legal agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Corona (Corona), the City of Norco (Norco), and the Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD) (collectively the Temescal Basin GSA) overlie the Temescal Groundwater Basin; and
WHEREAS, the Members have developed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the purpose of complying with SGMA requirements to form a GSA and to cooperatively develop, adopt, implement and manage a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Temescal Groundwater Basin in accordance with SGMA; and
WHEREAS, through the MOU, the City of Corona has accepted the primary responsibility to develop a GSP for the Temescal Basin of the Upper Santa Ana Basin, submit the final draft to the Department of Water Resources (DWR), and prepare annual reports thereafter; and
WHEREAS, after public review and hearing, the Norco City Council shall by Resolution adopt the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, which shall be filed by the City of Corona with the Department of Water Resources by January 31, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, that the 2022 Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan is hereby adopted, and it is authorized to be filed with the DWR along with any additional information required by law.

Resolution No. 2022-07 - 2022 Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

January 19, 2022
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on January 19, 2022.
______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on January 19, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on January 19, 2022
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Home Gardens
County Water District
January 2022
Temescal Basin
Groundwater
Sustainability Plan
Home Gardens
County Water District

Temescal Basin GSP
This page is intentionally blank.

TEMESCAL BASIN

GROUNDWATER

SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
January 2022
And

Temescal Basin GSP
This page is intentionally blank.

Temescal Basin GSP

SIGNATURE PAGE
_____________________________
Chad N. Taylor, PG, CHG
Principal Hydrogeologist, Todd Groundwater
_____________________________
Maureen K Reilly, PE
Senior Engineer, Todd Groundwater
_____________________________
Gus Yates, PG, CHG
Senior Hydrologist, Todd Groundwater
_____________________________
Michael P. Maley, PG, CHG, CEG, PE
Principal Hydrogeologist, Todd
Groundwater

Temescal Basin GSP i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.............................................................................................................. ES-1 ES-1 Basin Setting ............................................................................................................. ES-1 ES-2 Groundwater Conditions.......................................................................................... ES-4 ES-3 Water Supply ............................................................................................................ ES-5 ES-4 Water Budget............................................................................................................ ES-5 ES-5 Sustainable Management Criteria ............................................................................ ES-7 ES-6 Monitoring Network ................................................................................................. ES-8 ES-7 Projects and Management Actions........................................................................... ES-8 ES-8 Implementation ........................................................................................................ ES-9 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1.Purpose of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan ......................................................... 1-2

1.2.Sustainability Goal ........................................................................................................ 1-2

1.3.Agency Information ...................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4.Groundwater Sustainability Agency Information......................................................... 1-3

1.4.1.Decision Making ..................................................................................................... 1-3

1.4.2.Roles and Responsibilities...................................................................................... 1-3

1.4.3.Legal Authority of the GSA..................................................................................... 1-4

1.4.4.GSP Development Costs and Funding Sources....................................................... 1-4

1.5.GSP Organization.......................................................................................................... 1-5 Plan Area............................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1.Geographic Area ........................................................................................................... 2-1

2.2.Land Use and Water Management Jurisdictional Agencies......................................... 2-1

2.2.1.Counties.................................................................................................................. 2-2

2.2.2.Cities....................................................................................................................... 2-2

2.2.3.Federal.................................................................................................................... 2-2

2.2.4.State ....................................................................................................................... 2-2

2.2.5.Conservation Easements........................................................................................ 2-3

2.2.6.Water Management Entities.................................................................................. 2-3

2.3.Water Supply ................................................................................................................ 2-4

2.3.1.Water Providers ..................................................................................................... 2-4

Temescal Basin GSP ii

2.3.2.Water Supply Sources ............................................................................................ 2-4

2.3.3.Water Use Sectors.................................................................................................. 2-6

2.4.Water Resources Monitoring Programs....................................................................... 2-7

2.4.1.Climate ................................................................................................................... 2-8

2.4.2.Surface Water Flows .............................................................................................. 2-8

2.4.3.Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................ 2-8

2.4.4.Groundwater Levels............................................................................................... 2-9

2.4.5.Groundwater Quality ............................................................................................. 2-9

2.4.6.Groundwater Production ....................................................................................... 2-9

2.4.7.Conjunctive Use/Managed Recharge................................................................... 2-10

2.4.8.Recycled Water .................................................................................................... 2-10

2.4.9.Imported Water.................................................................................................... 2-10

2.4.10.Land use ............................................................................................................. 2-10

2.4.11.Natural Resources.............................................................................................. 2-10

2.4.12.Land subsidence ................................................................................................. 2-10

2.4.13.Incorporation of Existing Monitoring into GSP .................................................. 2-11

2.5.Water Resources Management.................................................................................. 2-11

2.5.1.AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan ............................................................ 2-11

2.5.2.Groundwater Monitoring Program and Protocols............................................... 2-12

2.5.3.Recharge Master Plan for the Temescal Basin..................................................... 2-12

2.5.4.Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin .................................. 2-13

2.5.5.Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update ....................................... 2-13

2.5.6.Santa Ana River Watershed One Water One Watershed Plan............................. 2-14

2.5.7.Corona and Norco Urban Water Management Plans.......................................... 2-15

2.5.8.Reclaimed Water Master Plan.............................................................................. 2-15

2.5.9.Water Resources Management Implementation Status...................................... 2-15

2.6.General Plans.............................................................................................................. 2-15

2.6.1.Riverside County General Plan............................................................................. 2-16

2.6.2.City of Corona General Plan ................................................................................. 2-16

2.6.3.City of Norco General Plan ................................................................................... 2-19

2.6.4.General Plan Influences on Groundwater Sustainability Agency Ability to Achieve Sustainability ................................................................................................................. 2-19

2.6.5.GSP Influences on General Plans.......................................................................... 2-20

Temescal Basin GSP iii

2.7.Additional GSP Elements............................................................................................ 2-20

2.7.1.Wellhead Protection Areas and Recharge Areas ................................................. 2-21

2.7.2.Groundwater Contamination Migration and Clean-up........................................ 2-21

2.7.3.Well Permitting, Construction, and Destruction Requirements.......................... 2-22

2.7.4.Efficient Water Management Practices ............................................................... 2-23

2.7.5.Relationships with State and Federal Agencies ................................................... 2-23

2.7.6.Land Use Plan Coordination ................................................................................. 2-23

2.8.Notice and Communication........................................................................................ 2-23

2.8.1.Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)................................................................... 2-24

2.8.2.Public Workshops................................................................................................. 2-25

2.8.3.Directed Outreach and Coordination................................................................... 2-25

2.8.4.Disadvantaged Community Outreach .................................................................. 2-25

2.8.5.Neighboring Basin Coordination .......................................................................... 2-25

2.8.6.Comments and Responses on Draft GSP.............................................................. 2-25 Hydrogeological Conceptual Model ................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.Physical Setting and Topography.................................................................................. 3-1

3.2.Surface Water Features................................................................................................ 3-2

3.3. Soils............................................................................................................................. 3-2

3.4.Geologic Setting............................................................................................................ 3-3

3.5.Faults ............................................................................................................................ 3-3

3.6.Aquifers......................................................................................................................... 3-3

3.6.1.Description of Principal Aquifer Units.................................................................... 3-4

3.6.2.Description of Lateral Boundaries.......................................................................... 3-6

3.7.Structures Affecting Groundwater ............................................................................... 3-6

3.8.Definable Basin Bottom................................................................................................ 3-6

3.9.Recharge and Discharge Areas..................................................................................... 3-7

3.10.Primary Groundwater Uses........................................................................................ 3-7

3.11.Data Gaps in the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model .................................................. 3-8 Current and Historical Groundwater Conditions................................................................ 4-1

4.1.Groundwater Elevations............................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.1.Available Data......................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.2.Groundwater Occurrence ...................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.3.Groundwater Elevations and Trends...................................................................... 4-2

Temescal Basin GSP iv

4.1.4.Groundwater Flow ................................................................................................. 4-3

4.1.5.Vertical Groundwater Gradients............................................................................ 4-4

4.2.Changes In Groundwater Storage ................................................................................ 4-4

4.3.Land Subsidence and Potential for Subsidence............................................................ 4-5

4.3.1.Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) ................................................ 4-6

4.4.Groundwater Quality.................................................................................................... 4-6

4.5.Key Constituents of Concern ........................................................................................ 4-8

4.5.1.Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) ................................................................................... 4-9

4.5.2.Nitrate as Nitrate (NO3).......................................................................................... 4-9

4.6.Other Constituents..................................................................................................... 4-10

4.6.1.Naturally Occurring Contaminants....................................................................... 4-10

4.6.2.1,2,3- Trichloropropane ....................................................................................... 4-11

4.6.3.Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)......................................................... 4-11

4.6.4.Monitoring Networks........................................................................................... 4-12

4.7.Threats to Water Quality............................................................................................ 4-13

4.7.1.Regulated Facilities............................................................................................... 4-13

4.7.2.Septic Systems...................................................................................................... 4-13

4.7.3.Non-point Sources................................................................................................ 4-13

4.8.Vertical Variations in Water Quality........................................................................... 4-13

4.9.Seawater Intrusion Conditions ................................................................................... 4-13

4.10.Interconnection of Surface Water and Groundwater............................................... 4-13

4.10.1.Stream Flow Measurements.............................................................................. 4-14

4.10.2.Depth to Groundwater....................................................................................... 4-16

4.10.3.Riparian Vegetation............................................................................................ 4-17

4.10.4.Wetlands and Interconnected Surface Water ................................................... 4-19

4.10.5.Animals and Interconnected Surface Water...................................................... 4-22 Water Budget...................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.1.Water Budget Methodology......................................................................................... 5-1

5.2.Dry and Wet Periods..................................................................................................... 5-1

5.3.Water Balance Analysis Periods ................................................................................... 5-2

5.4.Management Areas...................................................................................................... 5-3

5.5.Methods of Analysis ..................................................................................................... 5-3

5.5.1.Rainfall-Runoff-Recharge Model............................................................................ 5-3

Temescal Basin GSP v

5.5.2.Groundwater Model............................................................................................... 5-4

5.5.3.Simulation of Future Conditions ............................................................................ 5-5

5.6.Surface Water Balance ............................................................................................... 5-10

5.6.1.Inflows to Surface Water...................................................................................... 5-12

5.6.2.Outflows of Surface Water................................................................................... 5-13

5.7.Groundwater Balance................................................................................................. 5-14

5.7.1.Inflows to Groundwater....................................................................................... 5-17

5.7.2.Outflows from Groundwater................................................................................ 5-19

5.8.Change in Groundwater Storage ................................................................................ 5-20

5.9.Estimate of Sustainable Yield ..................................................................................... 5-20 Sustainable Management Criteria...................................................................................... 6-1

6.1.Sustainability Goal ........................................................................................................ 6-2

6.1.1.Description of Sustainability Goal .......................................................................... 6-2

6.1.2.Approach to Sustainability Indicators.................................................................... 6-2

6.1.3.Summary of Sustainable Management Criteria ..................................................... 6-4

6.2.Chronic Lowering of Groundwater Levels.................................................................... 6-5

6.2.1.Description of Undesirable Results........................................................................ 6-5

6.2.2.Potential Causes of Undesirable Results................................................................ 6-6

6.2.3.Definition of Undesirable Results........................................................................... 6-7

6.2.4.Potential Effects on Beneficial Uses and Users...................................................... 6-7

6.2.5.Sustainable Management Criteria for Groundwater Levels................................... 6-7

6.2.6.Minimum Thresholds ............................................................................................. 6-9

6.2.7.Measurable Objectives......................................................................................... 6-13

6.3.Reduction of Groundwater Storage ........................................................................... 6-13

6.3.1.Description of Undesirable Results...................................................................... 6-14

6.3.2.Potential Causes of Undesirable Results.............................................................. 6-14

6.3.3.Definition of Undesirable Results......................................................................... 6-14

6.3.4.Potential Effects on Beneficial Uses and Users.................................................... 6-15

6.3.5.Sustainable Management Criteria for Groundwater Storage.............................. 6-15

6.3.6.Minimum Threshold............................................................................................. 6-16

6.3.7.Measurable Objectives......................................................................................... 6-18

6.4.Seawater Intrusion ..................................................................................................... 6-19

6.5.Land Subsidence ......................................................................................................... 6-19

Temescal Basin GSP vi

6.5.1.Description of Undesirable Results...................................................................... 6-20

6.5.2.Potential Causes of Undesirable Results.............................................................. 6-20

6.5.3.Potential Effects on Beneficial Uses and Users.................................................... 6-21

6.5.4.Minimum Threshold............................................................................................. 6-21

6.5.5.Measurable Objectives......................................................................................... 6-23

6.6.Degradation of Water Quality .................................................................................... 6-24

6.6.1.Potential Causes of Undesirable Results.............................................................. 6-24

6.6.2.Description of Undesirable Results...................................................................... 6-25

6.6.3.Potential Effects on Beneficial Uses and Users.................................................... 6-25

6.6.4.Sustainable Management Criteria for Groundwater Quality............................... 6-26

6.6.5.Minimum Thresholds ........................................................................................... 6-26

6.6.6.Measurable Objectives......................................................................................... 6-30

6.7.Depletions of Interconnected Surface Water............................................................. 6-31

6.7.1.Description of Undesirable Results...................................................................... 6-32

6.7.2.Potential Causes of Undesirable Results.............................................................. 6-32

6.7.3.Definition of Undesirable Results......................................................................... 6-33

6.7.4.Potential Effects on Beneficial Uses and Users.................................................... 6-33

6.7.5.Sustainable Management Criteria for Interconnected Surface Water................ 6-34

6.7.6.Minimum Threshold............................................................................................. 6-34

6.7.7.Measurable Objective .......................................................................................... 6-36

6.7.8.Data Gaps............................................................................................................. 6-37 Monitoring Network........................................................................................................... 7-1

7.1.Description of Monitoring Network ............................................................................. 7-1

7.1.1.Chronic Lowering of Groundwater Levels.............................................................. 7-3

7.1.2.Reduction of Groundwater in Storage ................................................................... 7-3

7.1.3.Seawater Intrusion ................................................................................................. 7-5

7.1.4.Subsidence ............................................................................................................. 7-5

7.1.5.Degraded Water Quality ........................................................................................ 7-6

7.1.6.Depletion of Interconnected Surface Water.......................................................... 7-7

7.2.Protocols for Data Collection and Monitoring.............................................................. 7-8

7.2.1.Field Methods for Monitoring Well Data ............................................................... 7-8

7.2.2.Field Methods for Groundwater Elevation Monitoring ......................................... 7-8

7.2.3.Field Methods for Groundwater Quality Monitoring............................................. 7-9

Temescal Basin GSP vii

7.3.Representative Monitoring ........................................................................................ 7-10

7.4.Data Management System (DMS) .............................................................................. 7-10

7.5.Assessment and Improvement of Monitoring Network............................................. 7-10

7.5.1.Identification and Description of Data Gaps........................................................ 7-11

7.5.2.Description of Steps to Fill Data Gaps.................................................................. 7-11 Projects and Management Actions .................................................................................... 8-1

8.1.Group 1 Projects........................................................................................................... 8-3

8.1.1.Groundwater Treatment........................................................................................ 8-3

8.1.2.Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Percolation Ponds........................................... 8-4

8.1.3.Water Level Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) ............................... 8-4

8.1.4.Water Shortage Contingency Plans........................................................................ 8-5

8.1.5.Water Conservation Program ................................................................................ 8-5

8.1.6.Participation in Integrated Regional Water Management Plans (IRWMP)............ 8-6

8.1.7.Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA)............... 8-7

8.1.8.Santa Ana Watershed Involvement........................................................................ 8-7

8.2.Group 2 Projects........................................................................................................... 8-8

8.2.1.Shallow Monitoring Well Installation..................................................................... 8-8

8.2.2.Potable Reuse Feasibility Study.............................................................................. 8-9

8.2.3.Mountain Runoff Capture Feasibility Study ......................................................... 8-11

8.3.Group 3 Projects......................................................................................................... 8-12

8.3.1.Groundwater Treatment...................................................................................... 8-12

8.3.2.Stormwater Capture, Treatment, and Recharge.................................................. 8-12

8.3.3.Santa Ana River Wastewater Discharge Coordination for Shallow Groundwater Conditions...................................................................................................................... 8-13 Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................... 9-1

9.1.Plan Implementation Resources and Responsibilities.................................................. 9-1

9.2.Annual Reporting.......................................................................................................... 9-1

9.3.New Information and Changes..................................................................................... 9-2

9.4.Periodic Evaluations ..................................................................................................... 9-2

9.5.Projects and Management Actions .............................................................................. 9-3

9.6.Schedule For Implementation ...................................................................................... 9-4

9.7.GSP Implementation Costs........................................................................................... 9-6

9.7.1.Funding Methods ................................................................................................... 9-6

Temescal Basin GSP viii
References ............................................................................................................... 10-1 List of Tables
Table 1-1. GSP Preparation Checklist..................................................................................... 1-7 Table 2-1. Water Use and Land Use by Sector (2020)1 .......................................................... 2-7 Table 2-2. Select Policies in the Riverside County General Plan.......................................... 2-17 Table 2-3. Selected Policies in the City of Corona General Plan.......................................... 2-18 Table 2-4. Selected Policies in the City of Norco General Plan............................................ 2-19 Table 2-5. Additional GSP Elements included in Water Code Section 10727.4................... 2-21 Table 2-6. Status of Contamination Sites in the Basin......................................................... 2-22 Table 5-1. Water Year Type Classification ............................................................................. 5-2 Table 5-2. Temescal Basin Land Use in 1990, 2018, and 2068 (acres) .................................. 5-9 Table 5-3. Annual Surface Water Budgets for the Temescal Basin 1990 to 2018 ............... 5-11 Table 5-4. Average Annual Groundwater Budgets.............................................................. 5-16 Table 5-5. Estimated Sustainable Yield................................................................................ 5-21 Table 6-1. Minimum Thresholds for Groundwater Levels................................................... 6-10 Table 6-2. Summary of Current Conditions for Nitrate (NO3) and TDS ............................... 6-27 Table 7-1. Temescal Monitoring Program Summary ............................................................. 7-2 Table 7-2. Wells in the Temescal GSA Monitoring Network.................................................. 7-4 Table 7-3. Identification and Description of Data Gaps....................................................... 7-11 Table 8-1 Summary of Projects and Management Actions ................................................... 8-2 Table 8-2. Existing and Projected Corona Groundwater Extraction Volumes (AFY).............. 8-3 Table 8-3. WRF Annual Percolation Pond Contributions (AFY).............................................. 8-4 Table 8-4. WSCP Shortage Level Determination.................................................................... 8-5 Table 8-5. City of Corona Santa Ana Watershed Task Forces/Groups................................... 8-7 Table 9-1. Estimated Timeline for Projects and Management Actions................................. 9-5 Table 9-2. GSP Implementation Cost Estimates .................................................................... 9-6 List of Figures
Figure ES-1. Temescal Basin................................................................................................. ES-2 Figure ES-2. Channel Aquifer ............................................................................................... ES-3 Figure ES-3. Representative Hydrograph, Corona Well 15.................................................. ES-4

Temescal Basin GSP ix
Figure 1-1. Temescal Groundwater Basin, GSA, and Adjacent Basins................................. 1-10 Figure 2-1. Temescal Basin GSP Area................................................................................... 2-27 Figure 2-2. Jurisdictional Areas............................................................................................ 2-28 Figure 2-3. Federal and State Lands..................................................................................... 2-29 Figure 2-4. Water Supply Sources within Basin - 2020 ........................................................ 2-30 Figure 2-5. Basin Domestic Groundwater Wells.................................................................. 2-31 Figure 2-6. Basin Production Groundwater Wells ............................................................... 2-32 Figure 2-7. Basin Public Groundwater Wells ....................................................................... 2-33 Figure 2-8. All Basin Groundwater Wells............................................................................. 2-34 Figure 2-9. Corona and Norco Facilities............................................................................... 2-35 Figure 2-10. Existing Land Use ............................................................................................. 2-36 Figure 2-11. 1984 Land Use ................................................................................................. 2-37 Figure 2-12. Disadvantaged and Severely Disadvantaged Communities............................. 2-38 Figure 3-1. Basin Topography ................................................................................................ 3-9 Figure 3-2. Tributary Surface Water in Basin....................................................................... 3-10 Figure 3-3. Watersheds Tributary to Basin .......................................................................... 3-11 Figure 3-4. Basin Soil Hydrologic Properties........................................................................ 3-12 Figure 3-5. Surficial Geology ................................................................................................ 3-13 Figure 3-6. Cross Section Line Orientation .......................................................................... 3-14 Figure 3-7. Cross Section A to A’.......................................................................................... 3-15 Figure 3-8. Cross Section B to B’ .......................................................................................... 3-16 Figure 3-9. Cross Section C to C’ .......................................................................................... 3-17 Figure 3-10. Channel Aquifer Extent and Hydraulic Conductivity ....................................... 3-18 Figure 3-11. Depth to Bedrock............................................................................................. 3-19 Figure 3-12. Groundwater Recharge and Discharge Areas.................................................. 3-20 Figure 4-1. Historically Monitored Wells............................................................................. 4-24 Figure 4-2. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 15........................................ 4-25 Figure 4-3. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 11........................................ 4-26 Figure 4-4. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 22........................................ 4-27 Figure 4-5. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 19........................................ 4-28 Figure 4-6. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 26........................................ 4-29 Figure 4-7. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 17A...................................... 4-30 Figure 4-8. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 8A........................................ 4-31

Temescal Basin GSP x
Figure 4-9. Representative Hydrographs City of Corona Well 13........................................ 4-32 Figure 4-10. Groundwater Elevation Contours, Fall 2015 ................................................... 4-33 Figure 4-11. Groundwater Elevation Contours, Spring 2017............................................... 4-34 Figure 4-12. Concepts of Land Subsidence .......................................................................... 4-35 Figure 4-13. Basin-Wide Subsidence Estimates from Satellite Measurements................... 4-36 Figure 4-14. Wells with Water Quality Data ........................................................................ 4-37 Figure 4-15. Total Dissolved Solids Concentrations in Wells, Water Years 2011 - 2019 ..... 4-38 Figure 4-16. Nitrate Concentrations in Wells, Water Years 2011 through 2019................. 4-39 Figure 4-17. Regional Surface Water Features.................................................................... 4-40 Figure 4-18. Stream Flow at Four Gages.............................................................................. 4-41 Figure 4-19. Temescal Wash Flow and Reclaimed Water Discharge................................... 4-42 Figure 4-20. Depth to Water Spring 2017............................................................................ 4-43 Figure 4-21. Critical Habitat Areas....................................................................................... 4-44 Figure 4-22. Historical Maximum Depth to Water Near Prado Wetlands........................... 4-45 Figure 4-23. Factors Related to Prado Wetland Groundwater Levels................................. 4-46 Figure 5-1. Cumulative Departure of Annual Precipitation at Lake Elsinore....................... 5-23 Figure 5-2. Effect of Climate Change on Precipitation and Evapotranspiration.................. 5-24 Figure 5-3. Land Use in 2018................................................................................................ 5-25 Figure 5-4. Surface Water Budgets 1990 through 2018 ...................................................... 5-26 Figure 5-5. Effect of Clipping on Simulated Tributary Stream Flow..................................... 5-27 Figure 5-6. Annual Groundwater Budgets 1990 to 2018..................................................... 5-28 Figure 5-7. Annual Groundwater Budgets Future Baseline ................................................. 5-29 Figure 5-8. Annual Groundwater Budgets, Growth Plus Climate Change ........................... 5-30 Figure 5-9. Dispersed Recharge ........................................................................................... 5-31 Figure 5-10. Cumulative Storage Changes 1990 to 2068..................................................... 5-32 Figure 6-1. Water Level Key Wells....................................................................................... 6-38 Figure 7-1. Groundwater Level Monitoring Wells............................................................... 7-12 Figure 7-2. Water Quality Monitoring Wells........................................................................ 7-13 Figure 8-1. Potential Shallow Monitoring Well Locations ................................................... 8-14

Temescal Basin GSP xi
Appendices (following text)
Appendix A – Memorandum of Understanding forming the Temescal Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Appendix B – Temescal GSA Notice of Decision to become a Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Appendix C – Groundwater Sustainability Plan Elements Guide Appendix D – Temescal Groundwater Sustainability Plan Stakeholder Outreach Plan Appendix E – List of Public Meetings During GSP Development and GSP Comments and Responses
Appendix F – Summaries of Technical Advisory Committee Meetings Appendix G – Summaries of Public Workshops and Associated Fact Sheets Appendix H – Summaries of Neighboring Basin Coordination and Community Leader Outreach Meetings
Appendix I – Draft GSP Comments and Responses
Appendix J – Temescal Groundwater Sustainability Plan Numerical Groundwater Model Documentation Report
Appendix K – Detailed Annual Surface and Groundwater Budgets Appendix L – Temescal Groundwater Sustainability Plan Data Management System Description

Temescal Basin GSP xii
Acronyms
1,2,3-TCP 1,2,3- Trichloropropane
AF acre-feet
AFY acre-feet per year
Basin Plan Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin Basin Temescal Subbasin
BMP Best management practices
CASGEM California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring CDA Chino Desalter Authority
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
cfs cubic feet per second
cfs/mi cubic feet per second per mile
CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System COC constituent of concern
Corona City of Corona
DAC disadvantaged community
DBP disinfection byproduct
DDW State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water DMS Data Management System
DWR California Department of Water Resources
DWSAP Drinking Water Source Water Assessment Program
ET Evapotranspiration
ETo Reference evapotranspiration
ft feet
ft/day feet per day
GAMA Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment
GDE groundwater dependent ecosystem
GIS geographic information system
gpcd gallons per-capita per day
gpd/ft2 gallons per day per square foot
GPS global positioning system
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
GWMP Groundwater Management Plan
HCP habitat conservation plan
HGCWD Home Gardens County Water District
in/yr inches per year
InSAR Synthetic Aperture Radar
IRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
JPA joint powers authority
K hydraulic conductivity
km2 square kilometers
LSCE Luhdorff and Scalmanini Consulting Engineers

Temescal Basin GSP xiii
M&I Municipal, commercial, and industrial
MA Management Area
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
Met Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
mg/L milligrams per liter
mgd million gallons per day
mi2 square miles
mm millimeter
MO Measurable Objective
MODFLOW United States Geological Survey modular finite-difference flow model
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MSHCP Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
msl mean sea level
MT Minimum Threshold
NAD83 North American Datum of 1983
NAVD88 North American Vertical Datum of 1988
NCCAG Natural Communities Commonly Associated with Groundwater NDMI Normalized Difference Moisture Index
NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
NO3 nitrate
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Norco City of Norco
NPS nonpoint source
NRCS U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Unit
NWIS National Water Information System
O&M operation and maintenance
ORP oxidation-reduction potential
Outreach Plan Stakeholder Outreach Plan
OWOW Plan One Water One Watershed Plan
OWTS On-Site Wastewater Treatment System
PCE Tetrachloroethylene
pCi/L picocuries per liter
PFAS per and polyfluoroalkyl substances
PFOA perfluorooctanoic acid
PFOS perfluorooctane sulfonate
PLSS Public Land Survey System
POTW publicly owned treatment works
ppt parts per trillion
PVC polyvinyl chloride
QA/QC Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Temescal Basin GSP xiv
RCDEH Riverside County Department of Environmental Health RCFCWCD Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District RFP request for proposals
RMP Recharge Master Plan
RO reverse osmosis
RWMP Reclaimed Water Master Plan
RWQCB Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
SAR Santa Ana River
SARHCP Upper Santa Ana River Habitat Conservation Plan
SARWQCB Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
SAWPA Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SDAC severely disadvantaged community
SFR Streamflow Routing Package
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SMCL Secondary maximum contaminant level
SNMP Salt and Nutrient Management Plan
SSURGO Soil Survey Geographic Database
SWP State Water Project
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TCE Trichloroethylene
TCP 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
TDS total dissolved solids
Temescal GSA Temescal Groundwater Sustainability Agency TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
TSS total suspended solids
TVWD Temescal Valley Water District
µg/L micrograms per liter
USBR United States Bureau of Reclamation
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USEPA United State Environmental Protection Agency
USFS United States Forest Service
USGS United States Geological Survey
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VOCs volatile organic compounds
WMWD Western Municipal Water District
WRCRWA Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority WRF Water Reclamation Facility
WSCP water shortage contingency plan

Temescal Basin GSP xv
This page is intentionally blank.

Temescal Basin GSP ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) requires local agencies in groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority to form Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and develop a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) to plan for achieving and/or maintaining sustainability within 20 years of implementing the plan.

The Temescal Groundwater Subbasin (Basin) has been designated by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as medium priority and must prepare a GSP.

Wishing to provide a framework for cooperative groundwater management and SGMA compliance, the City of Corona (Corona), City of Norco (Norco), and the Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD) executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in March 2017 establishing the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Temescal GSA). In August 2017, the Temescal GSA became the GSA for the Basin by submitting a formation notice to DWR. While Corona is leading this effort, the GSP will be developed jointly among the three agencies, with coordinated implementation toward sustainable management.

ES-1 BASIN SETTING
Figure ES-1 shows the Basin located in western Riverside County. Figure ES-1 also shows the adjacent Bedford Coldwater, Chino, and Riverside-Arlington Subbasins of the Upper Santa Ana Groundwater Basin and the Coastal Plain of Orange County Basin. The Temescal Basin is bounded on the west by the Santa Ana Mountains and the east by low-lying El Sobrante de San Jacinto and La Sierra hills.

The Basin is located within one of the structural blocks of the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California. The Basin occurs in a linear low-lying block, referred to as the Elsinore-Temecula trough, between the Santa Ana Mountains on the west and the Perris Plain on the east (Todd and AKM 2008). The trough extends from Corona to the southeast some 30 miles and was formed along an extensive northwest-southeast trending fault zone including the Elsinore, Chino, and related faults. The Elsinore and Chino fault zones bound the Basin on the west and trend along the mountain fronts.

The basin-fill alluvial deposits and, to some extent, the underlying sedimentary units make up the aquifers in the Basin. However, these deposits do not fall neatly into two categories of permeability, such as bedrock and basin fill. Aquifer packages composed of various geologic units have been defined based on depositional environment, degree of consolidation, groundwater production, and location throughout the Basin.

Three aquifer packages provide water supply to wells in Basin: the Channel Aquifer, the Alluvial Fan aquifers, and, to a lesser extent, consolidated sandstone aquifers (Todd and AKM 2008). Of these three aquifers, the Channel Aquifer is the only principal aquifer as it the most productive aquifer and provides most of the groundwater supply in the Basin, Figure ES-2.

Temescal Basin GSP ES-2
Figure ES-1. Temescal Basin

Temescal Basin GSP ES-3
Figure ES-2. Channel Aquifer

Temescal Basin GSP ES-4
ES-2 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Water levels in the Channel Aquifer vary in response to wet and dry hydrologic cycles.

Increased pumping and prolonged drought have resulted in a slight decline in water levels over the past twenty years. Groundwater levels reached their respective highs in the early 1980s in response to a wet hydrologic cycle that began in 1978. These higher levels also correlate to a period of relatively low pumping in the Basin. During a later wet cycle from 1992 to 1998, water levels did not recover to 1980s levels, likely related to an increase in Basin pumping. The lowest groundwater levels generally correspond to dry periods and periods of increased pumping, though the responses throughout the Basin are not uniform.

Figure ES-3. Representative Hydrograph, Corona Well 15

Temescal Basin GSP ES-5
1980s levels; pumping in the Basin had increased in this period. Hydrographs from most wells show lowering water levels from 2000 to 2004, a period that was not hydrologically dry but had increased pumping in Corona. In the Well 15 hydrograph, the lowest water levels occurred during the 2015 to 2017 period, during and following drought conditions.

There have been slight increases since then in 2018 through 2019 due in part to increased precipitation after 2015.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and nitrate are the primary constituents of concern in the Basin.

Groundwater in the Basin is somewhat mineralized, with high TDS concentrations in many monitored wells. Recent average TDS concentrations in the Basin are above the 500 milligrams per liter (mg/L) lower secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) for drinking water, but below the upper SMCL of 1,000 mg/L.

Groundwater in the Basin has been impacted by human activities both in the Basin and watershed including agricultural, urban, and industrial land uses. Elevated nitrate concentrations have been documented in the Basin since at least the 1950s. Recent average nitrate as nitrate (NO3) concentrations in the Basin are moderate; the recent average concentration in the Basin is 42.8 mg/L. The maximum contaminant level (MCL) for nitrate as NO3 in drinking water is 45 mg/L.

ES-3 WATER SUPPLY
Sources of water supply for agricultural, municipal and industrial (M&I), and domestic uses include groundwater, imported water, and recycled water. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Met) is the wholesaler for imported water and its sources of water include the Colorado River and the State Water Project. Both Corona and Norco receive imported water from Met for distribution in the Basin.

Groundwater has been an important component of water supply in the Basin for more than 100 years. Until the 1970s, most of the groundwater production in the Basin was for agricultural supply. A few well owners have also produced small amounts of groundwater for domestic and industrial use. There are no current private domestic groundwater users in the Basin. Production for municipal supply increased in the 1960s and 1970s and continues today.

For more than 50 years, Corona and HGCWD have relied on groundwater from the Basin for municipal uses, and these agencies have long been responsible for managing groundwater conditions in the Basin. Norco has also relied on groundwater but their wells are located outside of the Temescal Basin (in the unadjudicated portion of the Chino Subbasin). Corona, in coordination with HGCWD and Norco, adopted a Groundwater Management Plan (GWMP) in 2008 that covers the Basin.

ES-4 WATER BUDGET
A water balance (or water budget) is a quantitative tabulation of all inflows, outflows, and storage change of a hydrologic system. This GSP contains a detailed water balance for both the groundwater system and surface water system of the Basin. The water budgets were

Temescal Basin GSP ES-6
developed for time periods representing historical, current, future no project (baseline), and future growth plus climate change (growth plus climate change) conditions.

Surface water and other inflows came from multiple sources. Monthly inflows in Temescal Wash were obtained from the baseline and growth plus climate change simulations produced by the Bedford-Coldwater Subbasin groundwater model (Todd, H&H, and Stantec 2021), which is concurrently being used to develop the GSP for that subbasin. Small stream and bedrock inflows simulated for 1993 to 2017 of the calibration model period were repeated twice to obtain 50 years of data.

In the historical model, the Basin water budgets were overall negative for the historical and current analysis periods, due to a variety of reasons and reflecting the different time periods. Storage declines during the early years of the simulation may have resulted from incorrectly estimated initial water levels. During 2000 to 2011, relatively high amounts of municipal groundwater pumping might have caused a gradual decrease in storage. Since 2011, the predominantly dry climatic conditions have resulted in reduced inflows and thus a decrease in storage. These historical storage declines have not resulted in undesirable results related to water levels or groundwater storage in the Basin to date. Most groundwater production in the Basin is for Corona municipal use, and Corona and the other GSA agencies have a portfolio of alternative water supply sources for future use.

Two future scenarios were simulated to test sustainability. In the baseline scenario, land use remains the same as the current conditions. The growth plus climate change scenario incorporated anticipated effects of climate change, urban development, and associated changes in water and wastewater management.

In both future scenarios, the total pumping was adjusted to pump within the sustainable yield of the Basin; the remaining municipal water demand will be supplied by imported and recycled water. Simulating pumping within the sustainable yield of the Basin in the groundwater model produced essentially no long-term storage change in the future baseline simulation.

Growth and climate change had relatively small effects that tended to offset each other. The warmer, drier climatic conditions tended to decrease stream percolation and rainfall recharge. Urban growth—much of which is projected to be in tributary watershed areas— tended to increase recharge because of irrigation deep percolation, pipe leaks and percolation of runoff from disconnected impervious areas. Notably, total water use and percolation of reclaimed water were assumed not to change appreciably, consistent with assumptions in the Corona’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) (Michael Baker 2021) that population growth will be offset by decreases in per-capita water use. Consequently, individual inflows and outflows in the growth plus climate change scenario were identical to or very close to the values in the future baseline scenario.

Average annual storage changes during both future scenarios were very slightly positive, with total inflows about34 AFY greater than total outflows. This was the intentional result of adjusting Corona pumping to achieve close to zero net storage change during 2019 to 2068.

Temescal Basin GSP ES-7
ES-5 SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
The sustainable management goal of the Temescal Basin is to sustain groundwater resources for the current and future beneficial uses of the Basin in a manner that is adaptive and responsive to the following objectives:
• Provide a long-term, reliable and efficient groundwater supply for municipal, industrial, and other uses
• Provide reliable storage for water supply resilience during droughts and shortages • Protect groundwater quality
• Support beneficial uses of interconnected surface waters, and • Support integrated and cooperative water resource management.

This goal is consistent with SGMA and is based on information from the Plan Area, Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, Groundwater Conditions, and Water Budget sections of this GSP that:
• Identify beneficial uses of Temescal Basin groundwater and document the roles of local water and land use agencies
• Describe the local hydrogeologic setting, groundwater quality conditions, groundwater levels and storage, and inflows and outflows of the Basin • Document the ongoing water resource monitoring and conjunctive management of groundwater, local surface water, recycled water, and especially imported water sources that help protect groundwater quality and maintain water supply.

A GSP must develop quantitative sustainability criteria for all applicable sustainability indicators that allow the GSA to define, measure, and track sustainable management. These criteria include the following:
• Undesirable Result – significant and unreasonable conditions for any of the six sustainability indicators.
• Minimum Threshold (MT) – numeric value used to define undesirable results for each sustainability indicator.
• Measurable Objective (MO) – specific, quantifiable goal to track the performance of sustainable management.

The sustainability indicators and sustainable management criteria are clearly defined and provide a quantitative analysis of the Basin’s sustainability. As the Basin has been managed without significant undesirable results, the following sustainability criteria are defined to avoid future undesirable results:
• The Minimum Threshold for defining undesirable results relative to chronic lowering of groundwater levels is defined at each Key Well by historical groundwater low levels. Undesirable results are indicated when two consecutive exceedances occur in each of two consecutive years, in sixty percent or more of the Key Wells.

Temescal Basin GSP ES-8
• The Minimum Threshold for reduction of groundwater storage for all Management Areas is fulfilled by the minimum threshold for groundwater levels as proxy. • The Minimum Threshold for subsidence is defined as a cumulative decline equal to or greater than one foot since 2015, which represents current conditions and the SGMA start date. This corresponds to a rate of decline equal to or greater than 0.2 feet in any five-year period.
• The Minimum Thresholds for degradation of water quality address nitrate and total dissolved solids (TDS) for the entire Basin.
o The Minimum Threshold for nitrate is defined initially as the percentage of wells with concentrations exceeding the nitrate MCL (45 mg/L) based on current conditions (2015-2019).
o The Minimum Threshold for TDS is defined initially as the percentage of wells with concentrations exceeding the TDS value of 1,000 mg/L based on current conditions (2015-2019).
• The Minimum Threshold for depletion of interconnected surface water is the amount of depletion that occurs when the depth to the water along the southern edge of the Prado Wetlands is greater than 15 feet for a period exceeding one year.

ES-6 MONITORING NETWORK
The monitoring network for GSP implementation has been established to document groundwater and related surface conditions as relevant to the sustainability indicators, MTs, and MOs. The components of the monitoring network are built from existing programs and will be carried out by the Temescal GSA.

The Temescal GSA, Corona specifically, has actively engaged in assessment and improvement of its monitoring network. This process has been intensified as part of the GSP, given the need to identify data gaps and to assess uncertainty in setting and tracking sustainability criteria. Monitoring improvements such as adding or replacing monitoring infrastructure are part of GSP implementation and will be reviewed and updated for each five-year GSP update.

ES-7 PROJECTS AND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
During the preparation of the GSP, the Temescal GSA identified five specific management actions (Actions) and three projects (Projects) to achieve the sustainability goal. The Actions are generally focused on data collection, storage and reporting of information necessary to monitor sustainability, and assessment of when Actions may be necessary (i.e., when MTs are approached or exceeded). The projects are generally designed to reduce uncertainty in areas where data gaps have been identified during development of the GSP. These projects and management actions are aimed at achieving sustainability goals and responding to changing conditions in the Basin. The projects and management actions are divided into three groups:
• Group 1 - Existing or established projects and management actions o Groundwater Treatment

Temescal Basin GSP ES-9
o Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) Percolation Ponds
o Water Level Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) o Water Shortage Contingency Plans
o Water Conservation Program
o Participation in Integrated Regional Water Management Plans (IRWMP) o Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA) o Santa Ana Watershed Involvement
• Group 2 - Projects and management actions that have been or are under development
o Shallow Monitoring Well Installation
o Potable Reuse Feasibility Study
o Mountain Runoff Capture Feasibility Study
• Group 3 - Conceptual projects and management actions that can be considered in the future if any Group 2 projects fail to be implemented or additional intervention is required to achieve basin sustainability goals
o Groundwater Treatment
o Stormwater Capture, Treatment, and Recharge
o Santa Ana River Wastewater Discharge Coordination for Shallow The Projects and Actions will be implemented by a combination of existing resources from the three agencies within the Plan Area and contracted resources.

ES-8 IMPLEMENTATION
The official adoption of the GSP by the Temescal GSA will initiate Plan implementation. After submittal of the GSP to DWR, and during the DWR review period, the Temescal GSA will continue to communicate with stakeholders via the Corona’s website and begin implementing the projects and management actions described in this GSP. The Plan will be implemented to sustainably manage groundwater in the Basin under the authority of the Temescal GSA and its member agencies.

The Temescal GSA is required to submit an annual report to DWR by April 1st of each year following adoption of the GSP. The first annual report will be due in April of 2022. The Temescal GSA has committed to implementing the GSP upon adoption and completing the projects and management actions necessary to monitor and maintain sustainability within the first five years of initiation of the GSP.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-1

INTRODUCTION
The City of Corona (Corona) is actively managing the Temescal Subbasin (Basin) of the Upper Santa Ana River Groundwater Basin (Figure 1-1) in collaboration with the City of Norco (Norco) and Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD). Corona, Norco, and HGCWD have previously participated in active management of water resources in the Basin. This management has included cooperation in preparing the 2008 Groundwater Management Plan (Todd and AKM 2008) and participation in regional planning and management. This historical experience provides a good foundation for continuation of groundwater management consistent with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA).

Wishing to provide a framework for cooperative groundwater management and SGMA compliance Corona, Norco, and HGCWD executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in March 2017 (Appendix A) establishing the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Temescal GSA). In August 2017, the Temescal GSA became the GSA for the Basin by submitting a formation notice to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). This notice included publication of the MOU and each individual party’s resolutions to become a GSA to DWR through the SGMA web portal. In the MOU, Corona has accepted the primary responsibility to develop a GSP for the Basin, to submit the GSP to DWR, and to prepare Annual Reports and GSP updates thereafter. While Corona is leading this effort, the GSP will be developed jointly among the three agencies, with coordinated implementation toward sustainable management.

The GSP reflects the rigorous, systematic process through which the Temescal GSA will manage the Basin. Figure 1-1 shows the Plan Area for this GSP, which encompasses the entire Basin.

Sustainable management of the Temescal Basin is critical to local water supply reliability.

The three local agencies (both individually and jointly) in the Temescal GSA have developed water supply portfolios including imported water, groundwater from multiple local basins, and reclaimed water for landscape irrigation. Water conservation measures also have been implemented (as documented in the recent Corona and Norco Urban Water Management Plans (Michael Baker 2021, Norco 2021)), providing an important tool for responding to water shortages. Local agencies are active in regional water management and recognize that local groundwater is a primary source of supply and needs to be reliable. The Temescal Basin area historically has experienced significant land use changes—shifting from agricultural to urban land uses—and subsequent water demand and supply changes. This transition was achieved in part with reliance on local groundwater. In fact, the Corona Groundwater Management Plan indicated that overdraft conditions occurred in the Temescal Basin during the last three years of the 1990 to 2004 period as pumping increased.

While conditions subsequently improved, this illustrates that overdraft can occur. Concerns about water supply reliability persist, given the uncertainties of imported water and climate change. Moreover, groundwater quality generally is poor; in fact, sustainable groundwater use is dependent on treatment at the Temescal Desalter. SGMA and the GSP process provide an important set of tools for Corona and the Temescal GSA partners to address these conditions and plan for water supply reliability into the future.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-2

1.1. PURPOSE OF THE GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
The purpose of this GSP is to assess water resource and land use conditions within the Basin, through an open and collaborative process, and to implement management activities to achieve (or maintain) long-term groundwater sustainability as defined by SGMA.

The GSP assesses sustainability related to each of the six SGMA defined sustainability criteria listed below:
• Lowering Groundwater Levels
• Reduction of Groundwater Storage
• Seawater Intrusion
• Degraded Water Quality
• Land Subsidence
• Surface Water Depletion.

The GSP presents conditions in the Basin relevant to each of these categories, defines thresholds for maintaining sustainability, outlines groundwater monitoring protocols, and management actions and projects designed to improve monitoring capabilities and/or to protect and enhance groundwater conditions. The GSP also includes a schedule and cost estimate for GSP implementation. Each element of the GSP is designed to promote Basin health and achieve and maintain the sustainability goal established for the Basin by the GSA.

1.2. SUSTAINABILITY GOAL
The sustainability goal is to sustain groundwater resources for the current and future beneficial uses of the Basin in a manner that is adaptive and responsive to the following objectives:
• Provide a long-term, reliable, and efficient groundwater supply for municipal, industrial, and other uses
• Provide reliable storage for water supply resilience during droughts and shortages • Protect groundwater quality
• Support beneficial uses of interconnected surface waters, and • Support integrated and cooperative water resource management.

1.3. AGENCY INFORMATION
The GSA agencies collaborated on preparation of this GSP, as described in the March 2017 MOU between the agencies. The City of Corona, City of Norco, and HGCWD each passed resolutions to authorize the MOU to establish the GSA:
• City of Corona - On March 15, 2017, Corona held a public hearing to determine whether to become a GSA, and adopted Resolution No. 2017-013, electing to jointly become a GSA with Norco and HGCWD.
• Norco - On March 15, 2017, Norco held a public hearing to determine whether to become a GSA, and adopted Resolution No. 2017-12, electing to jointly become a GSA with Corona and HGCWD.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-3
• HGCWD - On March 23, 2017, HGCWD held a public hearing to determine whether to become a GSA, and, by minute action, elected to jointly become a GSA with Corona and Norco.

On May 10, 2017, Temescal GSA submitted to DWR a Notice of Decision to Become a Groundwater Sustainability Agency, along with required information including a boundary map of the GSA and a list of interested parties. After the 90-day review period, on August 8, 2017, Temescal GSA became the groundwater sustainability agency for the Basin.

As required by GSP Regulations §354.6 and SGMA §10723.8, the Notices of Decision to become a Groundwater Sustainability Agency are included in Appendix B. These each include the resolution, list of interested parties, and boundary map.

The point of contact for the Temescal GSA is:

Katie Hockett, Assistant General Manager
City of Corona Department of Water and Power
Temescal Basin GSA
755 Corporation Yard Way Corona, CA 92880
(951) 279-3601
[email protected]

1.4. GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY INFORMATION
As described above, the Temescal GSA was formed through a MOU between Corona, Norco, and HGCWD to act as the GSA for the Basin (Temescal Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Basin, Basin Number 8-002.09), which is a DWR-designated medium priority basin.

The Temescal GSA is dedicated to participating in the collective goal of reaching groundwater sustainability in California.

Corona, Norco, and HGCWD have relied on groundwater from the Basin for municipal use for decades. In 2008, Corona adopted a Groundwater Management Plan that covers the entire Basin.

1.4.1. Decision Making
As detailed in the MOU, decisions in by the Temescal GSA are reached by unanimous consent of the parties; however, if unanimous consent is not possible, a majority vote of the three agencies rules.

1.4.2. Roles and Responsibilities
The MOU also documents the responsibilities of the individual agencies, including:
• Corona shall have the primary responsibility to develop a GSP within the boundaries of the Temescal GSA and submit the GSP to DWR for review and evaluation.Corona shall also have the primary responsibility to prepare and submit the annual and five year reports to DWR pursuant to SGMA and DWR’s implementing regulations.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-4
• The parties will work jointly to fulfill the purpose of the MOU within the boundaries of the Temescal GSA.
• The parties will meet regularly to discuss SGMA, GSP development, and implementation activities, assignments, and ongoing work progress. • The parties may form committees as necessary from time to time to discuss issues that impact the Temescal GSA.
• Corona is responsible for implementing the GSP in areas of the Temescal GSA that are within Corona’s service area boundaries and within Corona’s sphere of influence.
• Norco is responsible for implementing the GSP in areas of the Temescal GSA that are within Norco’s service area boundaries.
• HGCWD is responsible for implementing the GSP in areas of the Temescal GSA that are within HGCWD’s service area boundaries.

1.4.3. Legal Authority of the GSA
The GSA has authority to develop a GSP and implement SGMA in the Temescal Basin. SGMA specifies additional enabling powers; for example, GSAs may choose to adopt standards for measuring and reporting water use, develop and implement metering, and manage extraction from individual wells.

Corona’s Authority. Corona is a local agency qualified to become a GSA because Corona manages water, has a water supply, and has land use responsibilities over a portion of the Basin.

Norco’s Authority. Norco is also a local agency qualified to become a GSA because Norco manages water, has a water supply, and has land use responsibilities over a portion of the Basin.

HGCWD’s Authority. HGCWD is also a local agency qualified to become a GSA because HGCWD is a county water district formed and operating pursuant to and in accordance with Division 12 of the California Water Code that manages water, has a water supply and overlies a portion of the Basin.

Those portions of the Basin outside of these service areas are not within the area of any other proposed GSA. While the service areas of Corona, Norco, and HGCWD do not cover the entire Basin, these agencies do propose to serve as the GSA for the entire Basin. The three agencies in the GSA are coordinating with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD) for these currently unmanaged areas. Specifically, the RCFCWCD recognized the ongoing efforts for this GSA and offered to participate in any advisory or stakeholder committee formed by the GSA.

1.4.4. GSP Development Costs and Funding Sources
In November 2017, the City of Corona applied for a Sustainable Groundwater Management Planning (SGMP) Grant to fund preparation of this GSP. In April 2018, DWR awarded the City of Corona with full funding of $732,338.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-5
Each party will be financially responsible for collecting data or information from within that party’s service area that is required to be provided for development of the GSP. Norco and HGCWD will not incur any financial expense related to development of the GSP and submittal of the GSP to the DWR.

Implementation costs include costs to continue monitoring as described in Chapter 7, implement management actions and projects as described in Chapter 8, and complete annual reports and periodic GSP evaluation and updates as required by SGMA. As summarized in Chapter 9, total annual costs (2021 dollars) are estimated at approximately $100,000 per year and single occurrence costs for projects and management actions anticipated to occur in the first five years of GSP implementation and the first periodic GSP evaluation and update total approximately $515,000 to $575,000 (2021 dollars).

The funding method for operating expenses and GSP implementation costs is by contributions by GSA member agencies (Corona, Norco, and HGCWD). This is the same mechanism utilized to fund development of the GSP (with significant supplemental contribution though California Proposition 1 Grant funding). Corona will be responsible for most of the ongoing implementation costs, which are within budget projections for the next several years. Funding for planning and implementation of some projects and management actions may be achieved with local, state, and federal sources. The local agencies track opportunities for outside financing (grants or loans) from state water programs and federal infrastructure funding. For local financing, the agencies update their financial plans and rates as needed.

1.5. GSP ORGANIZATION
This GSP is organized generally to follow the GSP Annotated Outline provided by DWR as one of its Guidance Documents (DWR 2016a). Major sections include:
• Executive Summary
• Chapter 1 – Introduction, purpose of the GSP, sustainability goal, agency information, and GSP organization.
• Chapter 2 – Plan Area description, water use sectors, water supply sources, water resources monitoring and management programs, current general plans, and other GSP elements.
• Chapter 3 – Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, description of the physical basin setting including surface water features, soils, geologic setting, faults, and aquifers, defined basin bottom, recharge and discharge areas, and cross sections. • Chapter 4 – Current and Historical Groundwater Conditions, discussion of groundwater elevations, land subsidence, groundwater quality and current monitoring, constituents of concern regarding water quality, interconnection of surface water and groundwater and the effects on groundwater dependent ecosystems (GDEs).
• Chapter 5 – Water Budget, discussion of the water budget, groundwater model, surface water and groundwater balance, change in groundwater storage, and estimate of sustainable yield.

Temescal Basin GSP 1-6
• Chapter 6 – Sustainable Management Criteria, sustainability goal and sustainability criteria for the six undesirable results.
• Chapter 7 – Monitoring Network, discussion of the monitoring that will continue to assess sustainability in the future.
• Chapter 8 – Projects and Management Actions, descriptions of projects and management actions for the Basin.
• Chapter 9 – Implementation Plan, estimate of GSP implementation costs, schedule, and plan for annual reporting and periodic evaluations. • Chapter 10 – References
A Preparation Checklist providing further organizational guidance to the GSP content requirements is provided in Table 1-1 and the GSP Elements Guide detailing GSP content in comparison to SGMA articles is included in Appendix C.

Table 1-1. GSP Preparation Checklist
GSP
Regulations
Section
Water Code
Section Requirement Description Section(s) or Page Number(s) in the GSP Article 3. Technical and Reporting Standards
352.2 Monitoring
Protocols
- Monitoring protocols adopted by the GSA for data collection and management - Monitoring protocols that are designed to detect changes in groundwater levels, groundwater quality, inelastic surface subsidence for basins for which subsidence has been identified as a potential problem, and flow and quality of surface water that directly affect groundwater levels or quality or are caused by groundwater extraction in the basin
Section 7.2
Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 1. Administrative Information 354.4 General
Information
- List of references and technical studies Section 10
354.6 Agency
Information
- GSA mailing address
- Organization and management structure
- Contact information of Plan Manager
- Legal authority of GSA
- Estimate of implementation costs
Section 1.3
354.8(a) 10727.2(a)(4) Map(s) - Area covered by GSP (Figure 1-1) - Adjudicated areas, other agencies within the basin, and areas covered by an Alternative (Figure 1-1) - Jurisdictional boundaries of federal or State land (Figure 2-1) - Existing land use designations (Figures 2-7, 2-8)
- Density of wells per square mile (Figures 2-3 through 2-6) Section 2
354.8(b) Description of the
Plan Area
- Summary of jurisdictional areas and other features Section 2.1 354.8(c)
354.8(d)
354.8(e)
10727.2(g) Water Resource
Monitoring and
Management
Programs
- Description of water resources monitoring and management programs - Description of how the monitoring networks of those plans will be incorporated into the GSP - Description of how those plans may limit operational flexibility in the basin - Description of conjunctive use programs
Section 2.4,2.5
Section 2.4
Section 2.6
Section 2.3.2
354.8(f) 10727.2(g) Land Use
Elements or Topic
Categories of
Applicable General
Plans
- Summary of general plans and other land use plans
- Description of how implementation of the GSP may change water demands or affect achievement of sustainability and how the GSP addresses those effects
- Description of how implementation of the GSP may affect the water supply assumptions of relevant land use plans
- Summary of the process for permitting new or replacement wells in the basin - Information regarding the implementation of land use plans outside the basin that could affect the ability of the Agency to achieve sustainable groundwater management Section 2.6
Section 2.6.4
Section 2.6.5
Section 2.7.3
Section 2.7.6
Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 1. Administrative Information (Continued) 354.8(g) 10727.4 Additional GSP
Contents
Description of Actions related to:
- Control of saline water intrusion
- Wellhead protection
- Migration of contaminated groundwater
- Well abandonment and well destruction program
- Replenishment of groundwater extractions
- Conjunctive use and underground storage
- Well construction policies
- Addressing groundwater contamination cleanup, recharge, diversions to storage, conservation, water recycling, conveyance, and extraction projects
- Efficient water management practices
- Relationships with State and federal regulatory agencies - Review of land use plans and efforts to coordinate with land use planning agencies to assess activities that potentially create risks to groundwater quality or quantity - Impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems
Section 2.7
354.10 Notice and
Communication
- Description of beneficial uses and users
- List of public meetings
- GSP comments and responses
- Decision-making process
- Public engagement
- Encouraging active involvement
- Informing the public on GSP implementation progress
Section 2.3
Section 2.8 and Appendices E and F
Appendix J (pending)
Section 1.4.1
Appendix D
Section 2.8
Section 2.8
T:\Projects\Corona GSP 46414\Deliverables\GSP\1 Introduction\Table 1-1 20210818.xlsx Todd Groundwater Des By: MR Page 334 of 1131 Ck By: CT

Table 1-1. GSP Preparation Checklist
GSP
Regulations
Section
Water Code
Section Requirement Description Section(s) or Page Number(s) in the GSP Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 2. Basin Setting
354.14 Hydrogeologic
Conceptual Model
- Description of the Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model
- Two scaled cross-sections
- Map(s) of physical characteristics: topographic information, surficial geology, soil characteristics, surface water bodies, source and point of delivery for imported water supplies Section 3, Figure 3-6 through 3-9
9 10727.2(a)(5) Map of Recharge
Areas
- Map delineating existing recharge areas that substantially contribute to the replenishment of the basin, potential recharge areas, and discharge areas
Figure 3-12
10727.2(d)(4) Recharge Areas - Description of how recharge areas identified in the plan substantially contribute to the replenishment of the basin
Section 3.9
354.16 10727.2(a)(1)
10727.2(a)(2)
Current and
Historical
Groundwater
Conditions
- Groundwater elevation data
- Estimate of groundwater storage
- Seawater intrusion conditions
- Groundwater quality issues
- Land subsidence conditions
- Identification of interconnected surface water systems - Identification of groundwater-dependent ecosystems
Section 4
354.18 10727.2(a)(3) Water Budget
Information
- Description of inflows, outflows, and change in storage - Quantification of overdraft
- Estimate of sustainable yield
- Quantification of current, historical, and projected water budgets Section 5.7
Not Applicable
Section 5.9
Section 5.7
10727.2(d)(5) Surface Water
Supply
- Description of surface water supply used or available for use for groundwater recharge or in-lieu use Sections 2.3.2, 2.4.6, and 5.6.2 354.20 Management
Areas
- Reason for creation of each management area
- Minimum thresholds and measurable objectives for each management area - Level of monitoring and analysis
- Explanation of how management of management areas will not cause undesirable results outside the management area
- Description of management areas
Not Applicable
Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 3. Sustainable Management Criteria 354.24 Sustainability Goal - Description of the sustainability goal Section 6.1 354.26 Undesirable
Results
- Description of undesirable results
- Cause of groundwater conditions that would lead to undesirable results - Criteria used to define undesirable results for each sustainability indicator - Potential effects of undesirable results on beneficial uses and users of groundwater Section 6.2.1, 6.3.1, 6.5.1, 6.6.1, 6.7.1
Section 6.2.2, 6.3.2, 6.5.2, 6.6.2, 6.7.2
Section 6.2.3, 6.3.3, 6.5.3, 6.6.3, 6.7.3
Section 6.2.4, 6.3.4, 6.5.4, 6.6.4, 6.7.4
354.28 10727.2(d)(1)
10727.2(d)(2)
Minimum
Thresholds
- Description of each minimum threshold and how they were established for each sustainability indicator
- Relationship for each sustainability indicator
- Description of how selection of the minimum threshold may affect beneficial uses and users of groundwater
- Standards related to sustainability indicators
- How each minimum threshold will be quantitatively measured Sections 6.2 through 6.7
354.30 10727.2(b)(1)
10727.2(b)(2)
10727.2(d)(1)
10727.2(d)(2)
Measureable
Objectives
- Description of establishment of the measureable objectives for each sustainability indicator - Description of how a reasonable margin of safety was established for each measureable objective - Description of a reasonable path to achieve and maintain the sustainability goal, including a description of interim milestones
Sections 6.2 through 6.7
T:\Projects\Corona GSP 46414\Deliverables\GSP\1 Introduction\Table 1-1 20210818.xlsx Todd Groundwater Des By: MR Page 335 of 1131 Ck By: CT

Table 1-1. GSP Preparation Checklist
GSP
Regulations
Section
Water Code
Section Requirement Description Section(s) or Page Number(s) in the GSP Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 4. Monitoring Networks 354.34 10727.2(d)(1)
10727.2(d)(2)
10727.2(e)
10727.2(f)
Monitoring
Networks
- Description of monitoring network
- Description of monitoring network objectives
- Description of how the monitoring network is designed to: demonstrate groundwater occurrence, flow directions, and hydraulic gradients between principal aquifers and surface water features; estimate the change in annual groundwater in storage; monitor seawater intrusion; determine groundwater quality trends; identify the rate and extent of land subsidence; and calculate depletions of surface water caused by groundwater extractions
- Description of how the monitoring network provides adequate coverage of Sustainability Indicators - Density of monitoring sites and frequency of measurements required to demonstrate short-term, seasonal, and long-term trends
- Scientific rational (or reason) for site selection
- Consistency with data and reporting standards
- Corresponding sustainability indicator, minimum threshold, measureable objective, and interim milestone
- Location and type of each monitoring site within the basin displayed on a map, and reported in tabular format, including information regarding the monitoring site type, frequency of measurement, and the purposes for which the monitoring site is being used - Description of technical standards, data collection methods, and other procedures or protocols to ensure comparable data and methodologies
Section 7.1
Section 7.0
354.36 Representative
Monitoring
- Description of representative sites
- Demonstration of adequacy of using groundwater elevations as proxy for other sustainability indicators
- Adequate evidence demonstrating site reflects general conditions in the area Section 7.3
354.38 Assessment and
Improvement of
Monitoring
Network
- Review and evaluation of the monitoring network
- Identification and description of data gaps
- Description of steps to fill data gaps
- Description of monitoring frequency and density of sites Section 7.5
Section 7.5.1
Section 7.5.2
Section 7.1.1
Article 5. Plan Contents, Subarticle 5. Projects and Management Actions 354.44 Projects and
Management
Actions
- Description of projects and management actions that will help achieve the basin’s sustainability goal - Measureable objective that is expected to benefit from each project and management action - Circumstances for implementation
- Public noticing
- Permitting and regulatory process
- Time-table for initiation and completion, and the accrual of expected benefits - Expected benefits and how they will be evaluated
- How the project or management action will be accomplished. If the projects or management actions rely on water from outside the jurisdiction of the Agency, an explanation of the source and reliability of that water shall be included.
- Legal authority required
- Estimated costs and plans to meet those costs
- Management of groundwater extractions and recharge
Section 8.0
354.44(b)(2) 10727.2(d)(3) - Overdraft mitigation projects and management actions Not Applicable Article 8. Interagency Agreements
357.4 10727.6 Coordination
Agreements - Shall
be submitted to
the Department
together with the
GSPs for the basin
and, if approved,
shall become part
of the GSP for
each participating
Agency.

Coordination Agreements shall describe the following:
- A point of contact
- Responsibilities of each Agency
- Procedures for the timely exchange of information between Agencies - Procedures for resolving conflicts between Agencies
- How the Agencies have used the same data and methodologies to coordinate GSPs - How the GSPs implemented together satisfy the requirements of SGMA - Process for submitting all Plans, Plan amendments, supporting information, all monitoring data and other pertinent information, along with annual reports and periodic evaluations - A coordinated data management system for the basin
- Coordination agreements shall identify adjudicated areas within the basin, and any local agencies that have adopted an Alternative that has been accepted by the Department Not Applicable
T:\Projects\Corona GSP 46414\Deliverables\GSP\1 Introduction\Table 1-1 20210818.xlsx Todd Groundwater Des By: MR Page 336 of 1131 Ck By: CT
!"a$
!"a$
?ÆE
?ÆE
?«E
!"a$
?ÆE
Path: T:\Projects\Corona GSP 46414\GIS\Maps\Figures\GSP Figures\Chapter 1 - Introduction\Figure 1-1 Temescal Basin.mxd Temescal Groundwater Basin and Groundwater Sustainability Agency Bedford-Coldwater Basin
Chino Basin
Riverside-Arlington Basin
Coastal Plain of Orange County Basin
Figure 1-1
Temescal Groundwater
Basin, GSA, and
Adjacent Basins
0 0.5 1
Miles
(
N
Temescal
Groundwater Basin

Temescal Basin GSP 2-1

PLAN AREA
This chapter provides a general description of the Temescal Baasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Area (GSP Area, Plan Area or Basin), consistent with GSP Regulations §354.8, and is organized into the follow sections:
• Geographic Area
• Jurisdictional Agencies
• Water Supply
• Water Resources Monitoring and Management Programs
• General Plans
• Additional GSP Elements
• Notice and Communication
The description of the Plan Area was developed from previous reports and studies, including the 2008 Groundwater Management Plan (2008 GWMP) for the City of Corona (Corona) (Todd and AKM 2008).

2.1. GEOGRAPHIC AREA
The GSP Area is the Temescal Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin (DWR 2016b) located in Riverside County. The Temescal Subbasin (Basin) underlies the southwest portion of the upper Santa Ana Valley, as shown on Figure 2-1.

The GSP Area is coincident with the Basin and covers approximately 23,500 acres or 37 square miles. The Basin borders the Chino Subbasin to the north, the Riverside-Arlington Subbasin to the east, the Bedford-Coldwater Subbasin of the Elsinore Basin to the south, and the Coastal Plain Subbasin of the Orange County Basin to the west. These adjacent basins are shown on Figures 2-1.

In general, the Basin is bounded by the Santa Ana River to the north, the El Sobrante de San Jacinto and La Sierra Hills and the Riverside-Arlington Subbasin to the east, the Santa Ana Mountains to the west, and Bedford-Coldwater Subbasin to the south (DWR 2016b).

2.2. LAND USE AND WATER MANAGEMENT JURISDICTIONAL

AGENCIES
Land use and land management activities can influence water demands, recharge potential, and water quality. This section identifies and describes the agencies with land use management responsibilities within the Basin. Detailed discussion of land use planning and policies relevant to groundwater management is included in Section 2.6. In general, these agencies can be categorized as follows:
• Counties
• Cities
• Federal

Temescal Basin GSP 2-2
• State
• Conservation Easements
• Water Management Entities.

The jurisdictional boundaries for agencies that have land use management responsibilities in the Basin are shown on Figures 2-2 and 2-3.

2.2.1. Counties
The Basin lies within the northwestern portion of Riverside County. Riverside County has jurisdiction for land use planning for unincorporated areas in the County. Small portions of the Basin along its northwestern side are unincorporated areas in Riverside County.

Riverside County also has responsibility for on-site wastewater treatment systems (i.e., septic systems) through its Department of Environmental Health. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (RCDEH) is also responsible for regulation of the construction, destruction, and maintenance of groundwater wells.

2.2.2. Cities
The Basin is almost entirely overlaid by Corona’s sphere of influence and the City of Norco (Norco). Corona and Norco have land use planning authority within their respective boundaries. General plan elements relevant to the GSP are discussed in Section 2.6. In addition to land use planning, the cities of Corona and Norco are responsible for stormwater management for their respective jurisdictions, which can impact basin recharge and therefore shallow ground water quality.

2.2.3. Federal
Federal Lands in the Basin, presented on Figure 2-3, include small portions of the northwestern Basin owned by the Department of Defense. Land along the southwestern edge of the Basin is US Forest Service (USFS) Cleveland National Forest and other federal Non-Forest Service Land within USFS. Resource management efforts in the Cleveland National Forest target fire, ecology, archaeological resources, and recreational resources.

These management activities can impact basin recharge, surface run-off, and surface and groundwater quality.

Prado Dam lies in the northwest corner of the Basin and is owned and operated by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers. The Prado Dam and Reservoir is the principle regulating structure on the Santa Ana River.

2.2.4. State
State Lands in the Basin are presented on Figure 2-3. A very small portion of northwestern edge of the Basin is in the Chino Hills State Park.

Temescal Basin GSP 2-3

2.2.5. Conservation Easements
Conservation easements for the Dos Lagos Golf Course, Temescal Canyon, and Lee Lake are held by the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD) just to the south of the Basin. RCRCD aims to conserve natural resources, including soil, water, plants, and wildlife in western Riverside and San Bernardino counties. RCRCD activities include conducting conservation projects, educating the community, and providing technical advice to land users.

Additionally, there is a 13-acre Fresno Canyon conservation easement that partially overlaps a small area of the westernmost portion of the Basin.

2.2.6. Water Management Entities
While Corona and Norco are the primary water suppliers in the Basin, other water management entities have jurisdictional and/or monitoring and management responsibilities in the Basin.

The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District) is located in the western portion of Riverside County and overlies the Basin. The Flood Control District regulates development in relation to floodplains and drainage, identifies potential flood hazards, and constructs flood control structures.

The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) is a joint power authority formed of several water agencies in the Santa Ana River watershed aimed at protecting the watershed and maximizing beneficial uses within the watershed. SAWPA focuses on water resource issues including water supply reliability, water quality improvement, recycled water, wastewater treatment, groundwater management, brine disposal, and integrated regional planning. SAWPA also administers the Basin Monitoring Program Task Force for the watershed, which monitors and reports surface water quality as well as produces Santa Ana River Wasteload Allocation Model Reports. These monitoring and reporting activities are necessary to determine compliance with the nitrogen and total dissolved solids (TDS) objectives for the watershed.

The Orange County Water District (OCWD) owns and operates the Prado Wetlands, 2,150 acres of constructed wetlands behind the Prado Dam, located just north of the northeast corner of the Basin. These wetlands improve water quality in the Santa Ana River by removing nitrate from the water.

Chino Basin Watermaster manages groundwater in the adjacent basin, Chino Basin (Upper Santa Ana Valley Basin 8-002.01). Chino Basin is upgradient of Temescal Basin and groundwater management in Chino will likely impact Temescal Basin. The GSA has been in communication with Chino Basin Watermaster through the GSP preparation process.

Temescal Basin GSP 2-4

2.3. WATER SUPPLY
Water supply for municipal and industrial uses include groundwater and imported water from the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD). In addition, recycled water is used for non-potable uses. The water providers within the Basin and additional detail on their various water sources are described in the following sections.

2.3.1. Water Providers
Corona serves water to the majority of the population within the Basin. Norco and the Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD) serve water to smaller portions of the Basin.

Corona provides water and wastewater services to residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial customers within the city as well as to the unincorporated communities of El Cerrito, Coronita, and parts of Temescal Canyon. Corona’s water service area encompasses approximately 39 square miles. Corona’s water sources include groundwater pumped from the Basin and the Coldwater Subbasin and imported water purchased from WMWD.

Norco is the sole water purveyor for the residents and businesses within its city boundaries, which encompass approximately 15 square miles. Norco purchases imported water from WMWD, purchases desalinated groundwater from the Chino Desalter Authority (CDA), and pumps groundwater from the Basin.

HGCWD serves water to a portion of the census-designated place of HGCWD and purchases all water from Corona.

The 2020 water supplies for each water purveyor from each water source are shown on Figure 2-4. Purchased imported water and groundwater from the Basin make up 53 percent and 47 percent of Corona’s supply, respectively (Michael Baker 2021). Purchased imported water and groundwater from the Chino Subbasin make up 93 percent and 7 percent of Norco’s supply, respectively (Norco 2021). Purchased imported water makes up 100 percent of the supply for HGCWD. Note that all of HGCWD purchased supply and a portion of Norco’s purchased supply are from Corona and are thus included in Corona’s total supply. It should be noted that these water supply distributions are based on year 2020 only and typically vary from year to year.

2.3.2. Water Supply Sources

2.3.2.1. Groundwater
Corona is the primary producer of groundwater in the Basin. Corona has 18 wells that extract water from the Basin for the purpose of potable water supply (Michael Baker 2021).

Norco has four active wells but they are located in the unadjudicated portion of the Chino Subbasin not the Basin.

A number of private wells were historically installed in the Basin. Well densities for domestic wells, production wells, public wells, and all groundwater wells completed and reported to DWR are shown on Figures 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, and 2-8 respectively. Well density varies throughout the Basin from 0 to 15 wells per square mile section. These well density maps

Temescal Basin GSP 2-5
show all the well completion reports that have been submitted to DWR over time. There are no records of which of these wells are currently active. However, the GSA agencies searched for existing active wells within the Basin. This search included reviewing water use records and contacting owners of large private properties (domestic, commercial, and industrial), inquiring about private wells in discussions with knowledgeable local residents and community leaders, and polling interested parties during public meetings. This effort indicated that the only private pumpers in the Basin are All American Asphalt, Dart Corporation, and 3M. No active private domestic wells were identified in this search.

Corona owns and operates the 10 million gallons per day (mgd) Temescal Desalter, a reverse osmosis (RO) treatment facility where groundwater from the Basin high in TDS is forced oneway through membranes that reject salts as waste brine. Corona then blends this water with locally produced groundwater. The location of the Temescal Desalter is shown along with other Corona water and wastewater facilities in Figure 2-9.

In addition to pumping groundwater from the Basin, Norco purchases groundwater from the CDA, which is extracted from the Chino Subbasin. This water purchase is further described in Section 2.3.2.3.

2.3.2.2. Local Surface Water
No surface water is used as a water supply source within the Basin. Just to the south of the Basin, Corona utilizes surface flows from Coldwater Canyon in percolation basins and then extracts groundwater from the Coldwater portion of the Bedford-Coldwater Subbasin.

2.3.2.3. Purchased or Imported Water
The Basin’s primary sources of imported water are supplied through WMWD, a member agency of Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Met). Imported water supply from WMWD consists of treated surface water, untreated surface water and desalinated brackish groundwater.

WMWD supplies treated surface water via the Mills Pipeline from Henry J. Mills filtration plant. The Mills Pipeline delivers treated water directly to Corona through metered turnout WR-24. This connection has an effective capacity of 6.5 mgd (Michael Baker 2021). Norco also receives water from WMWD via the Mills Pipeline, which is then wheeled through a metered connection from Corona to Norco (Norco 2021).

WMWD supplies untreated surface water via the Lower Feeder. The Lower Feeder supplies raw water to Corona’s Lester Water Treatment Plant through metered turnout WR-19 and to Corona’s Sierra del Oro Water Treatment Plant through metered turnout WR-33. The Lester Plant has a peak capacity of 30 mgd, and the Sierra del Oro Plant has a peak capacity of 9.0 mgd (Michael Baker 2021).

WMWD supplies desalinated brackish groundwater via the Arlington Desalter to both Corona and Norco. Norco entered into a purchase water agreement with WMWD to purchase a minimum of 4,400 acre-feet per year (AFY) of treated groundwater annually from the Arlington Desalter reverse-osmosis treatment facility (Norco 2021). Excess production from the desalter is made available to Corona (Michael Baker 2021).

Temescal Basin GSP 2-6
Norco is a member agency of the CDA, a Joint Powers of Authority. Norco has an annual obligation to purchase 1,000 AFY of reverse osmosis treated potable groundwater water from CDA (City of Norco 2021).

The City of Corona operates well(s) for HGCWD and supplies them with all their water supply.

The reliability of imported water is documented in WMWD’s 2020 UWMP (WSC 2021). The WMWD UWMP details the potential constraints facing Met, the wholesaler that provides most of the imported water supply for WMWD, Corona, and Norco. Various past and ongoing actions address the water supply threats including water conservation, increased storage programs, and augmenting water supplies. Because of their robust planning efforts, WMWD’s UWMP indicates there would be 99 percent of supply available in a single dry year and 100 percent of supply in multiple dry years. In addition, Corona maintains a two-way connection with the City of Riverside that can be used in the event of an emergency.

2.3.2.4. Recycled Water
As shown on Figure 2-9, three wastewater reclamation facilities are located in the Basin.

Existing reclaimed water supply is provided by three Water Reclamation Facilities (WRF1, WRF2 and WRF3) and two non-potable wells owned and operated by Corona. The average annual production from these sources is approximately 11.35 mgd or 12,700 AFY. Corona is a member of the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA), which operates a new wastewater reclamation facility in Eastvale. When WRCRWA is fully implemented, Corona’s level of recycled water production will stay the same. However, the location of sources of supply will shift to the north and Corona will have access to additional recycled water supply from WRCRWA (Corona 2018).

Norco is also a member of WRCRWA but does not currently receive and distribute recycled water.

2.3.2.5. Conjunctive Use/Managed Recharge/In-Lieu Recharge In 2013, Corona prepared a Recharge Master Plan (RMP) for the Basin that defines the groundwater management objectives for the Basin. The RMP lays out goals and alternatives for artificial recharge in the Basin. Implementation of the RMP is ongoing. Corona currently discharges tertiary treated effluent from its Wastewater Treatment Plants No. 1 and No. 2 to the Lincoln/Cota Ponds, where the effluent is either lost to evapotranspiration or percolated to groundwater (WEI 2013).

2.3.3. Water Use Sectors
Water use sectors are defined in the GSP Regulations as categories of water demand based on the general land uses to which the water is applied, including urban, industrial, agricultural, managed wetlands, managed recharge, and native vegetation.

The distribution of current land use types in the Basin is presented on Figure 2-10. While the land use types are more detailed than the water sector categories, the land use mapping provides relevant background information for understanding the various water uses and

Temescal Basin GSP 2-7
locations of these uses in the Basin. A significant portion of the Basin is characterized as single-family residential land use. The next most common land use type within the Basin is industrial. Water use and land use by sector for Corona, Norco, and the Basin are presented in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1. Water Use and Land Use by Sector (2020)
1 Water Use Sector Corona Water Use Norco Water Use Basin Land Use Urban2 87 percent 82 percent 70 percent
Industrial3 13 percent 18 percent 11 percent
Agricultural 0 percent 0 percent 1 percent
Managed Wetlands 0 percent 0 percent 0 percent
Managed Recharge 0 percent 0 percent 0 percent
Native Vegetation 0 percent 0 percent 18 percent
Notes:
1) Water use data is provided by Corona and Norco’s Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) (Michael Baker 2021 and Norco 2021) and land use data is based on an analysis of the land use parcels included in the Basin as shown in Figure 2-10.
2) Urban water use for Corona does not include commercial uses, which is reported as combined with industrial. 3) Industrial water use includes commercial uses.

2.4. WATER RESOURCES MONITORING PROGRAMS
This section summarizes the following water resources monitoring activities in the Basin:
• Climate
• Surface Water Flow
• Surface Water Quality
• Groundwater Levels
• Groundwater Quality
• Groundwater Production
• Conjunctive Use/Managed Recharge
• Recycled Water
• Imported Water
• Land Use
• Land Subsidence
• Incorporation of Existing Monitoring into GSP
Several ongoing monitoring programs provide data and information relevant to the Basin.

Corona, Norco, other local agencies, state agencies and federal agencies are responsible for the various monitoring programs, which are summarized briefly below (Sections 2.4.1 through 2.4.12).

Temescal Basin GSP 2-8

2.4.1. Climate
The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of Drinking Water (DDW) compiles climate data in the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS).

This database includes total solar radiation, soil temperature, air temperature/relative humidity, wind direction, wind speed, and precipitation. While the CIMIS database is a comprehensive source for climate data, there are no CIMIS stations in the Basin. The closest CIMIS stations are:
• Chino No. 255 - This station is located north of the Basin (Latitude: 33.985350, Longitude: -117.656528).
• U.C. Riverside No. 44 - This station is located east of the Basin (Latitude: 33.964942, Longitude: -117.33698).

2.4.2. Surface Water Flows
United States Geological Survey (USGS) owns and operates two streamflow gauges in the Basin. These include:
• TEMESCAL C AB MAIN ST A CORONA CA (11072100) - This station is located on the Temescal Creek near Main Street in Corona.
• SANTA ANA R BL PRADO DAM CA (11074000) - This station is located along the Santa Ana River below Prado Dam.

2.4.3. Surface Water Quality
Corona and Norco are both members of the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force. The Task Force is a collaborative effort of publicand private-sector agencies and interests focused on the development of pathogen TMDLs for Santa Ana River Reach 3, its tributaries, and other water bodies in the Chino Basin area, located immediately north of the Basin. Formed in 2007, the Task Force has been working on several pathogen-related activities and studies for the Chino Basin. The objectives of this Task Force are to implement a number of tasks identified by the Regional Board in their 2005 Amendment to the water quality control plan (Basin Plan) (SWRCB 2020a). These include the implementation of a watershed-wide monitoring program to assess compliance with water contact recreation (REC-1) beneficial use water quality objectives for fecal coliform, evaluate numeric targets established for E. coli, and identify and implement measures to control sources of impairment. The Task Force works with the Regional Board in the formulation of pathogen TMDL allocation and implementation strategies (SAWPA 2018).

The Upper Temescal Valley Salt and Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) developed by Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District includes several management actions, one of which is the implementation of a monitoring program.

This monitoring program includes seven surface water monitoring sites, one of which is in the GSP Area. This privately-owned continuous flow gage is located at the All American Aggregate pit in Corona, the discharge point of the Temescal Wash (WEI 2017).