Norco City Council
August 6, 2025

AGENDA
City Council
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 4:00 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Gregory Bowen, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

WORKSHOP
A. Discussion of Proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan RECOMMENDATION:

Discussion of Proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan and provide feedback to staff.

Staff Report - Pdf

INTRODUCTION
A. Introduce Beacon Hill property and determine if Council desires to discuss price and terms in Closed Session - Oral Report
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve discussion in Closed Session the price and terms of Beacon Hill property
City Council Agenda - August 6, 2025

CLOSED SESSION

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code §54954.5
Agency designated representatives: Acting City Manager and City Attorney Employee organization: Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO Local 606

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Anticipation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9:
(2 potential cases)

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property APN No. 130-240-022 - 25.36 acres development site - CG Zone Agency negotiator: Acting City Manager
Negotiating parties: Pensco Trust Co Luce David B
Under negotiation: Price and Terms

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: (APN 153121010; APN 153121008; APN 153121012; APN 153121004; APN 153121003; APN 153121002; APN 153121001)
Agency negotiator: City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Public Works, Community Development Director and Finance Director
Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Property Owners: (Samuel Davis and Carly Davis; Denee Simeone and Joseph Simeone; Robert Barth; Kent Crowson and Wanda Crowson; Rafael Ramirez; Juan Ramirez and Beatriz Ramirez; Jeffery Nelson and Otila Nelson)
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: Silverlakes Sports Park - APNs 152060004; 152060011; 152070001; 152070002; and 152070011
Agency negotiator: City Manager
Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Balboa Management Group LLC.

Under negotiation: Price and Terms

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case) - Consider preparation and filing of Amicus brief in support of City of Huntington Beach – City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom, et al. (9th Cir. Case No.: 23- 3694)
RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Robin Grundmeyer
INVOCATION Pastor Michelle Ehrenberg
The Redeemer's Community Church

City Council Agenda - August 6, 2025

PRESENTATIONS
WRCOG Inland Regional Energy Network - City of Norco Final Energy Resilience Roadmap - Casey Dailey

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time when persons wishing to address the presiding governmental body regarding the Consent Calendar, Legislative Matters or items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Please submit a speaker card to the Meeting Clerk. Please limit comments to three minutes or less. The Ralph M. Brown Act limits the governmental body’s ability to respond to comments on non-agendized matters at the time such comments are made. The governmental body shall not discuss or act relative to any general public comment.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be enacted by one motion. Prior to the motion to consider any action by the presiding governmental body, any public comments on any of the Consent Items will be heard. There will be no separate action unless members of the governmental body request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be separately considered under Item 4 of the Agenda.

3.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.C. Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - August 6, 2025

3.D. Amendment of Fiscal Year 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include additional funding for the On-Call Street Maintenance Services; and accept the proposal and Award of Performance Services Contract for On-Call Street Maintenance Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-55 to increase Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-30 CIP street funding in the amount of $100,000 for the On-Call Street Maintenance Service contract; accept the proposals submitted for performance services to provide Annual On-Call Street Maintenance Services, award a three-year contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc., and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract in the amount not-to-exceed $300,000 annually.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.E. Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate for the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo and Adopt Resolution No. 2025-53
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-53, designating Council Member Kevin Bash as the voting delegate to represent the City of Norco at the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Council Member Greg Bowen as alternate.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.F. Acceptance of Proposal and Award of Contract for On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the proposals and award a three-year contract to Superior Pavement Markings for Annual On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services, with an annual expenditure not to exceed $70,000.

Staff Report - Pdf

City Council Agenda - August 6, 2025

3.G. Acceptance of Proposal and Award of Multi-year Contract for Water System Valve and Hydrant Assessment Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the proposals submitted for professional services to provide Water System Valve and Hydrant Assessment Services, award a three-year contract to Xylem Dewatering Solutions Inc., dba Wachs Water Services and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract in the amount not-toexceed $180,000 annually.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.H. Acceptance of the 2024-25 Equestrian Trail Fencing Replacement Project as Complete
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the 2024-25 Equestrian Trail Fencing Replacement Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

Staff Report - Pdf

3.I. Adoption of Resolution 2025-54 to Authorize Participation in the National Opioid Settlements
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-54 to Authorize Participation in the National Opioid Settlements.

Staff Report - Pdf

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR

5. LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
No new evidence will be heard from the public as the public hearing has been closed regarding the items listed. If new substantial amendments are made to the Ordinance at this time, the Ordinance will require a "Third" reading and public comments will be allowed.

City Council Agenda - August 6, 2025

5.A. Second Reading: Ordinance No. 1132 Approving Zone Change (pre-zone) 2023-01, to Pre-zone Approximately 56.82 Acres of Territory North of Bluff Street and West of River Road in the County of Riverside to be annexed to the City of Norco as Part of Annexation 27
RECOMMENDATION:

Second Reading: Ordinance No. 1132 approving Zone Change (pre-zone) 2023-01.

Staff Report - Pdf

6. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)
Order of Presentation for Discussion Items:

1. Staff Report Presentation

2. Council Questions of Staff

3. Public Comment

4. Council Discussion and Action

6.A. Discussion of Fireworks Prohibition per Municipal Code 9.20.020 RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss Fireworks Prohibition per Municipal Code 9.20.020.

Staff Report - Pdf

6.B. Discussion and Consideration of a Horse Trail Dedication Program RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide feedback on the consideration of a Horse Trail Dedication Program.

Staff Report - Pdf

7. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

8. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting is encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 270-5623 or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. Staff reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the presiding governmental body regarding any item on this agenda will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at Norco City Hall, located at 2870 Clark Avenue in Norco. The meeting is recorded.

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Prepared By: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Discussion of Proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan RECOMMENDATION:

Discussion of Proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan and provide feedback to staff.

SUMMARY:

The City has completed a draft of the proposed comprehensive Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan for City Council’s review. The last comprehensive fee study was completed six years ago with several fee and cost allocation plan updates occurring since FY 2019. The City Council will review each service and the suggested recovery rate to determine how much of each service should be recovered through fees and how much should be subsidized through the City’s tax dollars. The review will provide direction to staff regarding the cost recovery of services associated with each fee.

BACKGROUND:

User fees and charges are collected to recover some or all costs incurred in providing a specific service from which one or more individuals obtain a benefit. It is best practice for cities to perform a comprehensive update every 5 years and review user fee and charge schedules annually. The periodic review of fees provides a consistent realignment of the fee structures when compared to the cost of providing the services.

The comprehensive study is in line with the City Council’s goal of assuring financial stability by identifying new revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

City departments have been working with Willdan Financial Services since June 2024 in determining the time required to provide certain services as well as providing measurements for allocation of overhead. City staff was interviewed regarding the processes and time to complete the service associated with the fee as well as service

provided on citywide processes. The result of the interviews is the proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No impact at this time. The outcome of the adoption of the Proposed Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan are the reduction or increase of fees as well as the overhead charges to funds other than the General Fund.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 “Assure financial stability by identifying new revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.”
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Preliminary Draft User Fee Study Report v1

City of Norco
User Fee Study
July 29, 2025
DRAFT

i Comprehensive User Fee Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 User Fee Background ............................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ....................................................................................................... 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Approach and Methodology ........................................................................... 6 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 6 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 6 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 8 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 8 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 9 Norco User Fees .................................................................................................... 10 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................. 10 Subsidization .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ................................................................................................................... 11 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Building & Safety ................................................................................................... 12 City Clerk.............................................................................................................. 13 Code Enforcement ................................................................................................. 14 Communications .................................................................................................... 15 Community Services ............................................................................................... 16 Animal Control ...................................................................................................... 17 Facilities Maintenance ........................................................................................... 18 Ingalls Event Center ......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

DRAFT

ii Comprehensive User Fee Study
Finance ................................................................................................................ 19 Business License .................................................................................................... 20 Fire ..................................................................................................................... 21 Planning ............................................................................................................... 22 Public Works ......................................................................................................... 23 Water Utility ........................................................................................................ 24 Sheriff .................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................. 26 Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ................................................................ 27 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis ....................................................................... 32 DRAFT

1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Executive Summary
The City of Norco engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and program activities. This report and the appendices herein identify 100% full cost recovery for City services. Appendix C details the full cost and suggested fees as determined through discussion with departmental staff. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.

DRAFT

2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole (“User Fees”). As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have become increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery targets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private benefits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the government is using community funds to pay for private benefits. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have more control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.

Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, Proposition 26, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of rendering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee. There are no fees suggested to be set above the cost of service and as such a public vote is not required.

California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, in times of fiscal shortages, California cities were able to raise property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.

Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the imposition of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a result, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Due to the thresholds needed to increase local taxes, cities have less control and very few successful options for new revenues.

The State of California took a series of actions in the 1990’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation, at the expense of local governments. In 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) take-away of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees further reduced local tax revenues.

In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus requiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seven categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as part of a User Fee study typically fall under categories one through five consisting of charges for specific benefits, government service, regulatory need, for use of government property, or a fine/penalty.

DRAFT

3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Additional Policy Considerations
State regulations require that municipalities update their fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of certain public services primarily benefiting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby typically reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.

In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments to recover reasonable support costs. Support costs are those costs relating to a local government’s central service departments that are allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the City’s Cost Allocation Plan. A Cost Allocation Plan identifies the central service functions of the City such as Finance, City Manager, and Human Resources and allocates their cost to the departments and funds of the City that they support. This plan was used in the User Fee study to account for the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost through the study.

As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that the City include an inflationary factor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule to allow the City to annually increase or decrease the fees by changes in a pre-approved inflationary index, as described below. However, such inflationary increases shall not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services each year.

The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “basket” of goods and services every year, the price deflators’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the primary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can also be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.

Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs but cannot rely solely on the CPI increase as it is incumbent upon each agency to ensure the amount of the fees charged does not exceeds the reasonable estimated costs of providing the services. It is also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every five years, which would include adding, amending, or removing fees for programs/services.

DRAFT

4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Study Objective
As the City of Norco seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. A User Fee Study provides assurance that the City has the best information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes that a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to understand the total cost of services and identify potential fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.

The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.

The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
 Developing a rational basis for setting fees
 Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model  Ensuring compliance with State law
 Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees  Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.

Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of the user fees charged by the following Norco departments and fee groups:
 Building & Safety
 City Clerk
 Code Enforcement
 Communications
 Community Services
 Animal Control
 Facilities Maintenance
 Finance
 Business License
 Fire
 Planning
 Public Works
 Water Utility
 Sheriff
DRAFT

5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.

Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff currently provide them at existing, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff level needs. This report provides a summary of the study results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all of the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide an influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or alternative approaches.

DRAFT

6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.

The standard fee limitation established in California law for such fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.

Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits (see Appendix B), but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
 Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
 Operating costs applicable to fee operations
 Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead  Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to 1,650 productive or billable hours to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employees are involved in non-billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary.

Dividing the full cost, including overhead, of a position by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate for how a service is provided, to calculate a fee’s cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.

DRAFT

7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Summary Steps of the Study
The process of the study is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:

Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
 Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
 Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.  Central Services Overhead: These costs, as provided via the City’s Cost Allocation Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments.

Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Cost Allocation Plan
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
DRAFT

8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Methodology
The three methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Program Cost Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (as opposed to actual costs) tend to influence rental based fee levels more than other types of services. Willdan employed a different methodology where appropriate to fit a programs’ needs and goals. Typical programmatic approach cases are valuation-based fees, Recreation programs, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.

Valuation Based Fees: This manner of collection is used when the valuation of the improvement can be used as a proxy for the amount of effort it would take for City staff to complete the service provided. More specifically, this approach is commonly used for certain User Fees in the Building Division. It is generally accepted that as a project’s size scales up, the cost of the project increases, and the amount of effort needed to review and inspect also increases. Using a valuation-based fees provides for a system that can adjust as project sizes scale. Land is not included in the valuation.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
 Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
 Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
 Reasonableness tests and validation
 Internal and external reviews
 Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees
Within the fee tables in Appendix C, the differences are identified between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:

DRAFT

9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
 Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
 Position staffing levels, seniority, and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
 Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
 Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole  Changes in the demand for services in a City may have also changed the staffing or cost structure of departments over time
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
 Budget and other cost data
 Staffing structures
 Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions  Direct work hours (billable/non-billable)
 Time estimates to complete work tasks
 Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.

DRAFT

10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Norco User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were obtained through interviews conducted with City staff for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.

It is important to note that the time data used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each service and will differ from City to City depending on staffing, positions involved, experience of staff, the use of consultants, and the policies and procedures in place for each City.

Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

The primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility of determining the final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Norco, and administrative and political discretion.

However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.

Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers, some services fall into the range between these two extremes.

Further complicating the decision, opponents of fees often assert that the activities subject to the fees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City, but it is important to distinguish the difference between any purported possible benefits that may be conveyed through the result of activities of the service receiver and the direct benefit being conveyed through the City providing the service to the requestor.

It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels.

DRAFT

11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool since it can be used to reduce fees to encourage certain activities (such as to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsidies can be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as to allow citizens to rightfully access services, without overburdensome costs.

Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that subsidies must be covered by another revenue source, typically the General Fund’s other unrestricted funds.

Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditions may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The cost of service study did not attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.

Summary
City staff is recommending setting user fees at suggested fee amounts as detailed in Appendix C. City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy initiatives, past performance, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors should influence staff recommendations and City Council decisions. In this case, the proper identification of additional services (new or existing services) and the update to a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule were the primary objectives of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the recommended fee levels for consideration by City Council.

The following sections provide background for each department, division, and fee group and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report.

DRAFT

12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Building & Safety
The Building and Safety Division operates under the direction of the Building Official, with two Community Development Technicians and one Building Inspector. This Division is responsible for the administration of the health and safety related codes from the California Building Code. The primary purpose of the Building and Safety Division is to insure the safety, health and accessibility of citizens in the built environment. To ensure this compliance, the Building Division permits new and remodel construction providing plan check services, permitting services, construction inspections, final building inspections, certificate of occupancy inspections, and enforcement on the provisions of the Code for unsafe conditions. The Building Division coordinates the review of building plans with the Fire, Engineering and Planning Divisions, as well as with County and State agencies when necessary.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Building and Safety Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Building and Safety services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 22 fees;
 3 fees would decrease;
 1 fee would change from actual cost to a flat fee;
 27 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 16% for current fees.

In addition to the above referenced fees listed under Building, the Building Permit fees are also provided by this division. For the Building Permit fees, valuation is used as a proxy for measuring the effort needed to provide services on a case-by-case basis. This method is an industry standard widely used by other jurisdictions to evaluate the cost of providing service. It is generally understood that the larger and more complex a project is, the more time and effort that is required to provide the service. Project valuation also follows that trend. By using a combination of either project valuation or historical revenue figures along with a multiplier or cost recovery analysis for historical and anticipated future trends, current cost recovery along with variability in charges due to project type and scale is determined. The result of the cost analysis completed for the Building Permit program found that the program is currently operating at 48% cost recovery based on activity level from fiscal year 2022-2025. Staff is recommending that the Building Permit table multiplier be increased to full cost recovery.

DRAFT

13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City Clerk
The City Clerk serves under the direction of the City Manager. The City Clerk serves as the City’s election official, as the neutral liaison between citizens and government, and as custodian of all official records for the City of Norco ensuring the preservation of the City’s legislative history. The City Clerk’s Office facilitates the preparation of City Council meeting agendas, prepares the minutes for all City Council meetings, administers the City’s records management system, maintains the City’s Municipal Code, ensures that elected and appointed officials comply with filing requirements in accordance with the Political Reform Act, fulfills Public Records Act requests, and oversees official City communications ensuring access to open and transparent government.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the City Clerk. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The services listed under City Clerk services consist of a few flat cost-based fees and others set by the State.

The analysis of the cost-based services relied upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are not in line with the full cost of providing service. Staff is recommending the fees remain as currently set as detailed in Appendix C.

DRAFT

14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Code Enforcement
The Code Compliance Division operates under the direction of the Community Development Director. Code Compliance is responsible for enforcing the Norco Municipal Code, including but not limited to, regulations of the California Building Code (CBC) and International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC); weed, graffiti and abandoned vehicle abatement; business license and commercial vehicle compliance enforcement; grading and excavation requirements and land use regulations. Compliance officers work closely with all internal departments as well as with Sheriff, Fire and Animal Control to support joint inspections and resource sharing, in an effort to further a coordinated City effort in pursuit of Code compliance.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Code Enforcement Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

All the fees listed under Code Enforcement fees are fines to set to deter the listed activities and are not otherwise recommended to be changed. One new fee, Code Enforcement Lien Additional And Removal, will be added and set at fully burdened rate plus any required County Fees.

DRAFT

15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Communications
The Communications Division develops and implements a comprehensive and focused communications strategy, coordinates community outreach opportunities, manages special events, produces multimedia content, and develops policies and procedures that protect City assets and centralize communication throughout the organization. The Communications Division also oversees the Community Outreach Program, Merchandise Program, Military Banner Program, Observance Program, Sixth Street Gateway Sign Advertising Program, and the Trademark and Licensing Program.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Communications Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Communications services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently just below the full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 41 fees;
 7 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 7% for current fees.

DRAFT

16 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Community Services
The Community Services Department provides a variety of special community events and recreational classes throughout the year, along with operating sports programs, a gymnasium, a full-service senior center, and a playschool program. As an equestrian community, the Animal Services division establishes standards for the care and health of animals; provides a safe haven animal shelter; sponsors adoption and placement of animals; and enforces laws to protect the well-being of all animals in the community. The Animal Shelter cares for more than 1,400 impounded animals annually.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Community Services Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of most Community Services programs encompassed facility rentals, sports, programs, and other community services. The fee for use for government owned facilities and property can be set discretionally by the City, typically based on past usage characteristics, policy goals, and surrounding jurisdiction comparison. The cost of capital acquisition, maintenance, repair, and upgrade to the City and subsequently the public is offset through rental or use fees. As such these fees should be set using the knowledge of activity use for the facilities, policy desires of the City, and market factors when desirable. It is generally accepted that some Recreation programs provide a measure of public benefit to the residents and City as a whole, and as such is it common for services to bear significant subsidies. In addition, cities generally want to ensure that their programs and services remain affordable to the community at large, and that the programs remain competitive with surrounding jurisdictions. For most fees in Community Services a standard cost of service approach was used, but some of the additional cost considerations above were not included as this is primarily an operational cost analysis study that does not include considerations for capital. The analysis found that the current fees for facility use and services are below the cost of providing them. The analysis also included a cost recovery analysis for Community Services as a whole and it was determined to be operating at around 30% cost recovery. The suggested fees detailed in Appendix C. would result in:
 An increase for 24 fees;
 4 new fees will be added;
 1 fee would decrease, and;
 23 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 18%.

DRAFT

17 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Animal Control
The City of Norco Animal Control Shelter houses stray animals, offers pet adoption services and is devoted to reuniting lost pets with their owners.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Animal Control. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Animal Control services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, excluding penalties, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. A program cost analysis was also completed to determine historical cost recovery based on provided services. The analysis found that the Animal Control currently has a cost recovery level of 27%. Staff is recommending that the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to the 30 fees;
 4 new fees will be added;
 All other fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 20%.

DRAFT

18 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Facilities Maintenance
The Facilities Maintenance Division is the key component to strengthening community image and sense of place. It is responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of all public buildings, and facilities. This division creates a safe and secure environment for the public to utilize. This Division is responsible for maintenance and operations, capital outlay, and improvements. The Division is a partner and support team to the Recreation, Youth, Parks, Rose Eldridge Senior Center, and Animal Control Divisions and takes pride in maintaining high expectations and standards for clean, presentable, and safe facilities in which the public can enjoy recreational experiences.

Public facilities include Norco City Hall, Community Center, Fire Stations 47 and 57, George Ingalls Equestrian Event Center, Sheriff Sub-Station, Scout House/Youth Center, Nellie Weaver Hall, sports fields, park restrooms, snack bars, Riley Gym, and the Animal Control Center. The strategic plan is reflected in the goals below to enhance the quality of life by improving the facilities and programs for the community, and striving to build on the excellent customer service currently provided to the community.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Facilities and Maintenance Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Facilities Maintenance services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 72 fees;
 1 fee will decrease;
 3 new fees will be added;
 2 fees will change from a fully burdened fee to a flat fee;  53 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 9% for current fees.

DRAFT

19 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Finance
The Finance Department is responsible for the following functions: accounting and financial reporting, budget administration, utility billing and call center, housing, special districts financial administration and cash/investments management.

The accounting and financial reporting function provides financial management and reporting, payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, business licensing, cashiering and general accounting services to the City consistent with professional standards and legal requirements. Through budget administration, the department provides financial support, direction, and oversight to the annual operating and capital budgets. This function also monitors the budgets to ensure compliance to the approved amounts. Utility Billing performs billing, collections and call center services for water and sewer activities. Housing performs assistance to low-income individuals with housing utility assistance programs and oversight of the deferred loans. The treasury function oversees the investment portfolio, cash flow monitoring, and technical assistance to special assessment and community facilities districts, debt administration and preparation of required reports. The department is also responsible for administering the fiscal affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency’s Successor Agency
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Finance Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The services listed under Finance services consist of reproduction, collection fee, penalties, livescan , yard sale permit, and the returned check fee set by the State. The analysis of a few of the fees relied upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. The only changes recommended is to align the returned check fee with Government Code 1719, add a new Credit Card Processing Fee of 2%, and all other fees would remain as currently set as detailed in Appendix C.

DRAFT

20 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Business License
A City Business License is required prior to commencing a business or any work in the City of Norco. The City of Norco’s business license is valid for a 12-month period starting July 1 and ending every year on June

30. The business license tax varies depending on the type of business. The City mails out the business license within a week after payment is received and all department approvals have been obtained.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with Business License. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Business License services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 18 fees;
 1 new fee, Name Change, will be added;
 18 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 15% for current fees.

DRAFT

21 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Fire
The Norco Fire Department operates two fire stations with two paramedic engine companies, a fire prevention bureau for planning and inspections, Emergency Operations Center and Volunteer Animal Rescue Team. To ensure the safest environment possible, public safety is a top priority. The Norco Fire Department is part of the CALFIRE/Riverside County Fire Department’s regional integrated, cooperative fire protection organization. The fire department provides fire suppression, emergency medical rescue, hazardous materials response, planning and inspections. The equipment used by the department has the versatility to respond to both urban and rural emergency conditions. Through a Cooperative Fire Service Agreement with the Riverside County Fire Department, the City has access to additional emergency equipment such as aerial truck companies, brush engines, hazardous material units and breathing support units.

The City Manager serves as the Emergency Services Director for the City. The Fire Department is charged with maintaining the City Emergency Plan, maintaining the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), maintaining the Emergency Operations Center (EOC), facilitating training and drills for the City and providing public education to schools, businesses and residents. The EOC is currently located in the Community Room at Station 47.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Fire Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Fire services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are below the updated cost of providing services. It is recommended that the City adjust fees to full cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 128 fees;
 1 fee would decrease;
 7 new fees would be added;
 38 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 20% for current fees.

DRAFT

22 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning
The Planning Division is managed by the Community Development Director. The Planning Division is responsible for all current and advanced planning projects and reports as well as code compliance. Current planning is responsible for administering and informing the public on the City’s Zoning ordinance, regulations policies and codes. Current planning projects include the land use entitlement process wherein property owners and developers obtain the right to develop their land consistent with the zoning requirements for the property in question. The process includes site plan review, conditional use permits, variances, tentative tract and parcel maps, zone changes, and specific plans. Current planning includes the necessary environmental analysis, establishment of mitigation measures, and documentation in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Advanced planning projects include maintaining the validity and legality of the General plan with periodic updates of the various elements of the General Plan as required by state mandate, or as is needed to reflect changes in state laws. In addition, annexations to the City and changes to the Sphere of Influence (where City boundaries are anticipated to expand in the future) are advanced planning issues. Advanced planning also includes regional and inter-agency planning to address such issues as regional habitat maintenance, demographic research and compilation, regional transportation planning, air quality, and climate change.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Planning Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Planning services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most fees are currently set below or above the full cost of providing service.

It is recommended that the City adjust fees to full cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 56 fees;
 1 fee would decrease;
 8 new fees would be added;
 1 fee would change to flat from an Actual Cost fee;
 2 fees would change to Actual Cost from a flat fee;
 29 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be a decrease of 27% for current fees.

DRAFT

23 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Public Works
The Public Works and Engineering Department provides a variety of services to residents and businesses.

Amongst these are production and distribution of potable and recycled water; collection and transmission of wastewater to regional treatment plants; construction and maintenance of pipelines; installation and maintenance of equestrian trails; and construction and maintenance of roadways, streets, storm drains and trails. The Department also provides engineering plan check, permitting and inspection services for public and private construction projects.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Public Works Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Public Works services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most current fee levels are subsidizing the cost of service. It is recommended that the City adjust fees to full cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 26 fees;
 2 fees would decrease;
 2 new will be added;
 28 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average estimated fee increase would be around 31% for flat service fees.

DRAFT

24 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Water Utility
The Water Division is responsible for the production, acquisition and delivery of potable water to City residents. The operations group maintains and repairs service laterals, water mains, and installs meters.

City staff operates a SCADA system that controls and monitors production and distribution of groundwater wells, booster pumps, reservoirs, treatment facilities, blending stations, and agency inter-connections.

Certified State of California operators and laboratory are responsible for collection and testing of water to assure that safe drinking water standards are met. Staff serves on the Chino Basin Desalter Authority Technical Advisory Committee, the Arlington Desalter Technical Advisory Committee and the Chino Basin Watermaster Advisory Group.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Water Utility. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Water Utility services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fees are not in line with the updated cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 6 fees;
 2 fees would decrease;
 14 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average estimated fee increase would be around 1%.

DRAFT

25 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Sheriff
The Norco Sheriff’s Office, located within City Hall, is a substation of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office Jurupa Valley Station.

Staffing includes one Sheriff’s Lieutenant assigned as the Police Chief, two Sheriff’s Sergeant who supervise the operation, one city-employed Executive Secretary to perform clerical and administrative tasks as well as help coordinate Norco Citizens Patrol, one part-time city-employed Community Service Officer (CSO) to maintain the public lobby operation from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, eight fulltime Deputy Sheriff’s assigned to patrol providing 48 hours of patrol staffing per 24- hour period, three Deputy Sheriff’s assigned to the Special Enforcement Team (providing crime prevention, event planning, and quality of life), two Deputy Sheriff’s assigned to Traffic Enforcement, one Deputy Sheriff assigned to Motor, and four civilian Community Service Officers to assist patrol operations and logistics.

Cases needing additional investigative work beyond a patrol deputy’s capabilities are referred to detectives at the Jurupa Valley Station. Clerical support, crime analysis, forensics, and property storage are provided through the Jurupa Valley Station.

Norco Citizen’s Patrol volunteers work at least one 4-hour patrol shift per week, direct traffic at collision scenes, assist with traffic control for community events, handle security at crime scenes, and conduct vacation checks and business checks, all of which assist deputies in the field.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Sherrif’s Office The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the Sheriff services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, excluding violations, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that fees are currently not in line with the updated full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 3 fees;
 1 fee would decrease;
 1 new fee, Handicap Placer Signoff, will be added;
 40 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 0.28% for current fees.

DRAFT

26 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a portion of the total allowable cost is recovered as staff not only works on services related to User Fees, but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and any other costs that are charged directly to the service requestor.

City of Norco- User Fee Study
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department
Total Salaries &
Benefits
Department
Operating Cost
Direct
Overhead
%
Indirect
Allocation
%
121: City Clerk 475,500 153,675 32% 0%
121: City Manager 469,400 47,600 10% 0%
121: Communications 226,100 56,800 25% 0%
121: Community Development 1,341,400 220,500 16% 40%
121: Community Services 2,891,742 1,051,655 36% 96%
121: Facilites & Maintenance 402,800 142,600 35% 0%
121: Fire & Emergency Services 29,600 20,000 68% 21%
121: Fiscal & Support Services 597,100 103,750 17% 0%
121: Human Resources 227,500 33,600 15% 0%
121: Park Maintenance 375,400 93,000 25% 0%
121: Public Works 364,300 258,100 71% 82%
121: Sheriff 165,300 81,100 49% 15%
124: Water Fund 2,101,100 886,044 42% 17%
126: Sewer Fund 925,100 488,100 53% 20%
133: Gas Tax Fund 367,700 83,500 23% 27%
135: Information Technology Fund
DRAFT 369,000 118,600 32% 0%

27 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position. When a central service department position works on a fee or project in the purview of an operating department, the overhead rates of the operating department (shown in Appendix A) will be applied to that central service positions’ salary and benefit rate for full cost recovery since indirect overhead cost only applies to non-central service functions of the City. For any user fee service request that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.

DRAFT

28 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Norco- User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
121: Community Development CD - Assistant Planner $97.03 121: Community Development CD - Associate Planner $103.82 121: Community Development CD - Building Inspector $150.74 121: Community Development CD - Building Official $164.11 121: Community Development CD - Code Enforcement Officer $71.48 121: Community Development CD - Community Development Specialist $85.99 121: Community Development CD - Director of Community Development $282.26 121: Community Development CD - Senior Code Enforcement Officer $95.46 121: Community Development CD - Senior Permit Technician $105.11 121: Community Development CD - Senior Planner $138.18
121: City Clerk Clerk - Administrative Clerk $72.23
121: City Clerk Clerk - City Clerk $204.68
121: City Clerk Clerk - Deputy City Clerk $65.11
121: City Manager CM - City Manager $301.86
121: Communications Comm - Communications Manager $104.75 121: Communications Comm - Communications Specialist $59.88 121: Community Services CS - Animal Control Officer $131.44 121: Community Services CS - Animal Control Superintendent $308.76 121: Community Services CS - Animal Control Supervisor $170.29 121: Community Services CS - Bus Driver $122.67
121: Community Services CS - Community Services Clerical Assistant $112.27 121: Community Services CS - Community Services Coordinator (Special Events) $117.89 121: Community Services CS - Community Services Coordinator (Sports) $128.66 121: Community Services CS - Community Services Manager $189.09 121: Community Services CS - Community Services Supervisor $159.06 121: Community Services CS - Director of Community Services $504.20 121: Community Services CS - Director of Facilities & Maintenance $463.85 121: Community Services CS - Events Coordinator $110.67 121: Community Services CS - Events Services Supervisor $234.71 121: Community Services CS - Executive Secretary $227.81 121: Community Services CS - Facilities Maint Superintentent $293.40 121: Community Services CS - Community Services Coordinator (Youth Services) $180.84 121: Community Services CS - Parks Maintenace Worker $88.07 121: Community Services CS - Parks Maintenance Worker I $107.88 121: Community Services CS - Parks Maintenance Worker II $125.42 121: Community Services CS - Senior Administrative Clerk $97.23 121: Facilites & Maintenance Facilities - Director of Facilities & Maintenance $235.20 121: Facilites & Maintenance Facilities - Facilities & Maintenance Supervisor $113.12 121: Facilites & Maintenance Facilities - Facilities Maint Superintentent $148.77 DRAFT

29 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Norco- User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
121: Facilites & Maintenance Facilities - Facilities Maint Tech II $62.21 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Account Clerk I $48.27 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Account Clerk II $55.82 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Account Clerk III $71.18 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Accountant $74.44 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Accounting Manager $116.24 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Administrative Analyst $68.73 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Customer Service Supervisor $64.60 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Director of Finance $224.06 121: Fiscal & Support Services Fiscal - Senior Accountant $82.60 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Dpty City Eng/Dpty Dir PW $171.51 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Permit Technician $72.35
133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Public Works Supervisor $180.37 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Senior Civil Engineer $132.45 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Senior Permit Technician $96.73 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Utility & PW Superintendent $197.16 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Utility Maintenance Worker I $75.47 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Utility Maintenance Worker II $84.46 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Utility Maintenance Worker III $142.89 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Wastewater Maintenance Tech I $70.19 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Wastewater Maintenance Tech II $140.92 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Water Quality Control Technician I $74.81 133: Gas Tax Fund Gas Tax - Water Quality Control Technician II $90.74 121: Human Resources HR - Adminstrative Clerk (HR) $40.69 121: Human Resources HR - Human Resources Manager $162.32 135: Information Technology Fund IT - Business Applications Analyst $82.02 135: Information Technology Fund IT - CIS Technician $78.53 135: Information Technology Fund IT - IT Manager $118.12 121: Park Maintenance Park Maint - Director of Facilities & Maintenance $216.74 121: Park Maintenance Park Maint - Parks Maintenance Worker I $46.21 121: Park Maintenance Park Maint - Parks Superintendent $108.17 121: Public Works PW - Admin Compliance Coordinator $168.17 121: Public Works PW - Dpty City Eng/Dpty Dir PW $342.06 121: Public Works PW - Permit Technician $144.30
121: Public Works PW - Public Works Supervisor $359.73
121: Public Works PW - Senior Civil Engineer $264.17
121: Public Works PW - Senior Permit Technician $192.92 121: Public Works PW - Sr. Admin Compliance Coordinator $185.32 121: Public Works PW - Utility & PW Superintendent $393.22 DRAFT

30 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Norco- User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
121: Public Works PW - Utility Maintenance Worker I $150.52 121: Public Works PW - Utility Maintenance Worker II $168.45 121: Public Works PW - Utility Maintenance Worker III $284.99 121: Public Works PW - Wastewater Maintenance Tech I $139.99 121: Public Works PW - Wastewater Maintenance Tech II $281.05 121: Public Works PW - Water Quality Control Technician I $149.20 121: Public Works PW - Water Quality Control Technician II $180.97 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Account Clerk I $75.08
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Account Clerk II $86.82
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Accountant $115.79
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Accounting Manager $180.79
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Admin Compliance Coordinator $98.68 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Administrative Analyst $106.91
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Adminstrative Clerk (HR) $64.72 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Customer Service Supervisor $100.49 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Director of Finance $348.50
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Dpty City Eng/Dpty Dir PW $200.71 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Human Resources Manager $258.20 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Permit Technician $84.67
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Public Works Supervisor $211.08 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Senior Accountant $128.47
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Senior Civil Engineer $155.01
126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Senior Permit Technician $113.20 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Sr. Admin Compliance Coordinator $108.74 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Utility & PW Superintendent $230.73 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Utility Maintenance Worker I $88.32 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Utility Maintenance Worker II $98.84 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Utility Maintenance Worker III $167.23 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Wastewater Maintenance Tech I $82.14 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Wastewater Maintenance Tech II $164.92 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Water Quality Control Technician I $87.54 126: Sewer Fund Sewer - Water Quality Control Technician II $106.19 121: Sheriff Sheriff - Executive Secretary $140.08
124: Water Fund Water - Account Clerk I $68.12
124: Water Fund Water - Account Clerk II $78.77
124: Water Fund Water - Accountant $105.05
124: Water Fund Water - Accounting Manager $164.02
124: Water Fund Water - Admin Compliance Coordinator $89.52 124: Water Fund Water - Administrative Analyst $96.99
DRAFT

31 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Norco- User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
124: Water Fund Water - Adminstrative Clerk (HR) $58.72 124: Water Fund Water - Customer Service Supervisor $91.16 124: Water Fund Water - Director of Finance $316.17
124: Water Fund Water - Dpty City Eng/Dpty Dir PW $182.09 124: Water Fund Water - Human Resources Manager $234.25 124: Water Fund Water - Permit Technician $76.82
124: Water Fund Water - Public Works Supervisor $191.50 124: Water Fund Water - Senior Accountant $116.55
124: Water Fund Water - Senior Civil Engineer $140.63
124: Water Fund Water - Senior Permit Technician $102.70 124: Water Fund Water - Sr. Admin Compliance Coordinator $98.66 124: Water Fund Water - Utility & PW Superintendent $209.33 124: Water Fund Water - Utility Maintenance Worker I $80.13 124: Water Fund Water - Utility Maintenance Worker II $89.68 124: Water Fund Water - Utility Maintenance Worker III $151.71 124: Water Fund Water - Wastewater Maintenance Tech I $74.52 124: Water Fund Water - Wastewater Maintenance Tech II $149.62 124: Water Fund Water - Water Quality Control Technician I $79.42 124: Water Fund Water - Water Quality Control Technician II $96.34 DRAFT

32 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in which the full cost, existing fee, and suggested fee is listed as “NA”, the amount or percentage was not calculable. This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includes a variable component that is not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was not calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against.

DRAFT

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ1 Plan Check 65% NA NA 65% $02 Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour (minimum charge-two hours) $57.00 * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. $173.02 0% $173.00 $116
3 Re-inspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 116.6 per inspection $57.00 * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. $173.02 0% $173.00 $116
4 Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour (minimum charge - one-half hour) $57.00 * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. $173.02 0% $173.00 $116
5 Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) $57.00 * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. $150.39 0% $150.00 $93
6 Technology Surcharge 5%
Applied to all Building & Safety Valuation fees, with the exception of microfilming and General Plan Maintenance fees 25% 80% 5% $0
7 Permit Types8 Assignment of Property Addresses 1 hour of staff time $105.11 0% $105.00 NA9 Carport Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $010 Commercial Deck - Engineered Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $011 Commercial Lattice patio Cover Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $012 Commercial Re-Roofing Replacements Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $013 Commercial Structural Roofing Alteration Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $014 Commercial Swimming Pool Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $015 Copy Fee - 11" x 17" sheet $0.50 $0.50 0% $0.50 $016 Copy Fee - 8 1/2" x 11" sheet $0.25 $0.25 0% $0.25 $017 Copy Fee - larger than11" x 17" $10.00 $52.56 1% $52.00 $4218 Duplicate Job Card $38.24 $52.56 1% $52.00 $1419 Electric Meter Reset Release $154.34 $199.30 0% $199.00 $4520 Garden Walls, City Standard, Single Lot Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $021 Garden Walls, Engineered, Single Lot Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $0 3 3
DRAFT

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ22 General Plan Maintenance/Update Fee $2 per $1,000 of building valuation $7 73% $2 $0 23 Inspection Fee (by outside consultant selected by the City) Cost + 30% NA NA Cost + 30% $024 Outdoor Landscape Irrigation Review Fully burdened hourly rate NA NA Fully burdened hourly rate $0 25 Photovoltaic Systems-Residential Rooftop up to 15kw ($15 per kw above 15kw) $500 max per SB 1222 $438.00 $594.27 0% $594.00 $156 26 Photovoltaic Systems-Residential Ground Mount $900.00 $762.44 0% $762.00 -$13827 Photovoltaic Systems-Commercial Rooftop up to 250 kw ($7 per kw above 250 kw) no CPI increase per SB1222 $900.00 $957.79 0% $957.00 $5728 Records Archiving - (11" x 17") $0.50 $26.78 98% $0.50 $029 Records Archiving - (8 1/2" x 11") $0.25 $26.53 99% $0.25 $030 Records Archiving - (Larger than 11" x 17") $10.00 $26.28 1% $26.00 $1631 Residential Deck/Balcony Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $032 Residential Lattice Patio Cover Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $033 Residential Re-Roofing Replacements Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $034 Residential Solid Patio Cover Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $035 Residential Structural Roofing Alteration Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $036 Residential Swimming Pools Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $037 Retaining Walls - Engineered Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $038 Retaining Walls - City Standard, Single Lot Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $039 Retaining Walls - Engineered, Single Lot Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $040 S-110 Fire Permit Processing $88.76 $157.67 0% $157.00 $68 41 S-120 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $738.88 $542.74 0% $542.00 -$19742 S-130 Temporary Power/Utilities $494.40 $543.53 0% $543.00 $4943 S-150 Certificate of Occupancy New Building $871.36 $640.57 0% $640.00 -$23144 S-160 Tenant Certificate of Occupancy $486.21 $640.57 0% $640.00 $15445 S-50 Special Inspections $259.50 $443.88 0% $443.00 $18446 S-80 Demolition Permit $335.95 $541.71 0% $541.00 $205 47 S-90 Water and Sewer Connection $289.54 $414.67 0% $414.00 $12448 Signage Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1-A NA NA Based on the Building Permit Fee Table 1- A $049 Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing Permits50 Commercial Electrical Fee per/sq ft $0.27 $0.55 0% $0.55 $0.2951 Commercial Mechanical Fee per/sq ft $0.24 $0.50 0% $0.50 $0.2652 Commercial Plumbing Fee per/sq ft $0.26 $0.54 0% $0.54 $0.2853 Residential Electrical Fee per/sq ft $0.27 $0.55 0% $0.55 $0.2954 Residential Mechanical Fee per/sq ft $0.24 $0.50 0% $0.50 $0.26 3 4
DRAFT

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ55 Residential Plumbing Fee per/sq ft $0.26 $0.54 0% $0.54 $0.2856 Manufactured Homes Permit Fees - Reference Title 25 3 5
DRAFT

Minimum
Value
Maximum
Value
Current Base
Rate
Current
Plus $$ For every
$1 $500 $23.50 $0.00 $0
$501 $2,000 $23.50 $3.05 $100
$2,001 $25,000 $69.25 $14.00 $1,000
$25,001 $50,000 $391.75 $10.10 $1,000
$50,001 $100,000 $643.75 $7.00 $1,000
$100,001 $500,000 $993.75 $5.60 $1,000
$500,001 $1,000,000 $3,233.75 $4.75 $1,000
$1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 $3.15 $1,000
Percent Change = 108%
Cost Recovery Level = 100%
***Total Valuation is based on the most current ICC valuation tables as published by the International Code Council
TABLE 1-A

BUILDING PERMITS FEES (BASED ON VALUATION)
# - TOTAL FEE IS EQUAL TO TABLE 1-A FEE CALCULATION X 2.818 36 DRAFT

CITY CLERK
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Notary Fees for Non-City Related Documents - State sets fee $15.00 Gov't Code, Section 8202.5 & 8211
NA NA $15.00 $0
2 Reproduction (Up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.25 NA NA $0.25 $0 3 Reproduction (Up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.50 NA NA $0.50 $0 4 Reproduction (Larger than 11" x 17") - Black/White or Color $10.00 $10.00 0% $10.00 $0 5 Reproduction Service – CD $1.00 NA NA $1.00 $06 Document Certification – $10 minimum plus reproduction costs $10.00 $102.34 90% $10.00 $0 7 Filing Fee - Municipal Election Candidate Nomination Papers - State sets fee $25.00 Election Code § 10228 NA NA $25.00 $0
8 Filing Fee - Initiative Notice of Intent (per initiative) - State sets fee $200.00 Elections Code § 9103 NA NA $200.00 $0
3 7
DRAFT

CODE ENFORCEMENT
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 ADMINISTRATIVE CITE FEE SCHEDULE2 GENERAL VIOLATIONS:3 1st Level $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $0 4 2nd Level $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $0
5 3rd Level $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $06 BUILDING VIOLATIONS:7 1st Level $130.00 NA NA $130.00 $08 2nd Level $700.00 NA NA $700.00 $09 3rd Level $1,300.00 NA NA $1,300.00 $010 SHORT TERM RENTAL:11 1st Level $1,500.00 NA NA $1,500.00 $0 12 2nd Level $3,000.00 NA NA $3,000.00 $013 3rd Level $5,000.00 NA NA $5,000.00 $0 14 Code Enforcement Lien Addition and Removal New NA NA Fully burdened rate plus required County Fee's
NA
3 8
DRAFT

Communications
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Military Banners City discretion based on cost and market value NA NA City discretion based on cost and market value $0 2 Merchandise City discretion based on cost and market value NA NA City discretion based on cost and market value $0 3 Gateway Sign Advertising4 For-Profit Rate: Rotates Every 3 Minutes (480 Displays per Day)5 One Month $630.00 NA NA $650.00 $206 Three Months (per month) $578.00 NA NA $600.00 $22 7 Six Months (per month) $525.00 NA NA $550.00 $258 One Year (per month) $473.00 NA NA $500.00 $27 9 For-Profit In-Town Discount: Option 1 Rotates Every 3 Minutes (480 Displays per Day)10 One Month $461.00 NA NA $475.00 $14 11 Three Months (per month) $410.00 NA NA $425.00 $1512 Six Months (per month) $359.00 NA NA $375.00 $1613 One Year (per month) $308.00 NA NA $325.00 $1714 For-Profit In-Town Discount: Option 2 Rotates Every 6 Minutes (240 Displays per Day)15 One Month $308.00 NA NA $320.00 $12 16 Three Months (per month) $256.00 NA NA $270.00 $14
17 Six Months (per month) $205.00 NA NA $220.00 $1518 One Year (per month) $154.00 NA NA $170.00 $1619 For-Profit In-Town Discount: Option 3 Rotates Every 12 Minutes (120 Displays per Day)20 One Month $154.00 NA NA $160.00 $6 21 Three Months (per month) $128.00 NA NA $135.00 $722 Six Months (per month) $103.00 NA NA $110.00 $723 One Year (per month) $77.00 NA NA $85.00 $824 Non-Profit Rate: Rotates Every 3 Minutes (480 Displays per Day)25 One Month $473.00 NA NA $475.00 $2 26 Three Months (per month) $420.00 NA NA $425.00 $527 Six Months (per month) $368.00 NA NA $375.00 $728 One Year (per month) $315.00 NA NA $325.00 $1029 Non-Profit In-Town Discount: Option 1 Rotates Every 3 Minutes (480 Displays per Day)30 One Month $308.00 NA NA $320.00 $12 31 Three Months (per month) $256.00 NA NA $270.00 $1432 Six Months (per month) $205.00 NA NA $220.00 $1533 One Year (per month) $154.00 NA NA $170.00 $1634 Non-Profit In-Town Discount: Option 2 Rotates Every 6 Minutes (240 Displays per Day)35 One Month $154.00 NA NA $160.00 $6 36 Three Months (per month) $128.00 NA NA $135.00 $7
39 DRAFT

Communications
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 37 Six Months (per month) $103.00 NA NA $110.00 $738 One Year (per month) $77.00 NA NA $85.00 $839 Trademark & Licensing40 One-Time Use License41 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $1542 One-Time Fee $25.00 NA NA $100.00 $7543 Crafter License44 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $15 45 Annual Fee $50.00 NA NA $100.00 $5046 Local License47 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $1548 Annual Fee Based on Number of Individual Product Types Licensed with a City of Norco Trademark49 1 - 3 Products $50.00 NA NA $100.00 $5050 4 - 6 Products $75.00 NA NA $150.00 $7551 7 - 10 Products $100.00 NA NA $200.00 $100 52 11 - 19 Products $150.00 NA NA $250.00 $100
53 20 + Products $200.00 NA NA $300.00 $100
54 Standard License55 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $15 56 Annual Fee Based on Number of Individual Product Types Licensed with a City of Norco Trademark57 1 - 3 Products $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $058 4 - 6 Products $750.00 NA NA $750.00 $059 7 - 10 Products $1,000.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $060 11 - 19 Products $1,500.00 NA NA $1,500.00 $0 61 20 + Products $2,000.00 NA NA $2,000.00 $062 Partnership License63 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $1564 Annual Fee $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $065 Promotional License66 Non-Refundable Application Fee $25.00 $41.16 3% $40.00 $1567 Annual Fee $300.00 NA NA $300.00 $0 4 0
DRAFT

Community Services
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Suggested Deposit Fee Δ1 General Facilities and Services2 Application Processing Fee $52.00 $58.90 2% $58.00 $63 Banner Installation Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $04 Booking Change $31.00 $44.17 21% $35.00 $45 Booking Fee - per date $9.00 (max $350) $11.78 7% $11.00 (max 350) $2 6 Community Large Room - hourly (occ. banquet 80 - 100 / occ. aud. 150 - 175) $65.00 $250.00 $189.53 66% $65.00 $250.00 $0 7 Community Small Room - hourly (occ. banquet 50 / occ. aud. 80) $49.00 $250.00 $189.53 74% $50.00 $250.00 $1 8 Community Room Cleaning Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $09 Conference Room - hourly $48.00 $150.00 NA NA $50.00 $250.00 $210 Exterior Restrooms $63.00 $0-275.00 NA NA $65.00 $2 11 Exterior Restrooms Cleaning Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $012 Field Lights - hourly Fully Burdened $16.00 0% $16.00 NA13 Field Prep $46.00 $107.88 30% $75.00 $2914 Horseshoes Rental - 3 day minimum - per set $13.00 $30.00 $29.45 15% $25.00 $80 per set $1215 Rose M. Eldridge Activity Room (2 hour minimum - per hour) $96.00 $250.00 $189.53 37% $120.00 $250.00 $2416 Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Kitchen (per hour) $38.00 $250.00 $56.13 20% $45.00 $717 Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Craft Room (2 hour minimum - per hour) $82.00 $250.00 $162.85 42% $95.00 $250.00 $13 18 Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Community Fee $68.00 $250.00 $162.85 42% $95.00 $250.00 $27 19 Rose M. Eldridge Senior Center Garden Fee $68.00 $250.00 $136.17 30% $95.00 $250.00 $27 20 Rose M. Eldridge Cleaning Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 21 Asset Replacement Fund $6.00 NA NA $7.00 $122 Open Space/Moon Bounce $51.00 NA NA $55.00 $423 Outdoor Courts (hourly night use) $31.00 $44.17 21% $35.00 $424 Outdoor Courts (hourly day use) $9.00 $44.17 43% $25.00 $16 25 Parking Lots $51.00 $50.00 NA NA $50.00 $50.00 -$126 Picnic Shelter Rental $93.00 $75.00 NA NA $93.00 $75.00 $027 Riley Gym - One Court (2 hour minimum) $57.00 $250.00 $189.53 66% $65.00 $250.00 $828 Riley Gym - Two Courts, hourly $113.00 $500.00 $349.60 63% $130.00 $250.00 $17 29 Riley Gym - Half court (2 hour minimum) $26.00 $100.00 $189.53 82% $35.00 $250.00 $930 Riley Gym Cleaning Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $031 Event Inspection Fee - Vendor/Retail per booth Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $032 Silverlake Events Special Handling/Permit Review Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 33 Sports Fields - hourly $66.00 $100.00 NA NA $75.00 $100.00 $934 Supplemental Staff Costs Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 35 Support, Operations and Maintenance Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 36 Vendor Booth for City Event 2.00-208.00 NA NA 2.00-250.00 $0 37 Sports and Programs38 Ballfield Bases (per use) $12.00 $29.45 59% $12.00 $0 39 BBQ $103.00 $100.00 NA NA $115.00 $1240 City - Sponsored Adult Sports Programs 2.00-676.00 NA NA 2.00-676.00 $0 41 City - Sponsored Special Events 2.00-103.00 NA NA 2.00-103.00 $0 42 City - Sponsored Youth Sports 2.00-203.00 NA NA 2.00-203.00 $0 4 1
DRAFT

Community Services
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Suggested Deposit Fee Δ43 Excursions Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 44 Insurance Policies Fully Burdened NA NA Fully Burdened $0 45 Mobile Recreation Rental NEW 185.00-600.00 NA NA 185.00-600.00 $0 46 SCMAF Insurance $5.00 NA NA $6.00 $147 Recreation & Leisure Programs & Services 2.00-439.00 NA NA 2.00-439.00 $0 48 Scoreboards (each) $35.00 $500.00 NA NA $35.00 $500.00 $0 49 Senior Programs 2.00-154.00 NA NA 2.00-154.00 $0
50 Senior Services Membership Fee (yearly) 0.00-34.00 NA NA 0.00-35.00 $151 Youth Programs (Wee People, etc.) 2.00-697.00 NA NA 2.00-697.00 $0 52 Facility Reservation Cancellation Fee Per Reservation53 46 days + from reservation date New NA NA 100% NA 54 31-45 days from reservation date New NA NA 10% loss of rental fees NA 55 16-30 days from reservation date New NA NA 25% loss of rental fees NA 56 1-15 days from reservation date New NA NA 50% loss of rental fees NA Consideration Groups by Resolution No. 2010-59 of the Norco City Council, will continue to be subsidized with reduced or waived fees.All other organizations and events will be charged full fees based on the fee policy and fee schedule. 4 2
DRAFT

Animal Control
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Adoption - Cat ** $21.00 $43.12 35% $28.00 $7
2 Adoption - Dog ** $34.00 $43.12 5% $41.00 $73 Adoption - Large Fowl (Emu, Ostrich) New $300.00 NA NA $300.00 $04 Adoption - Livestock-Bovine New $1,250.00 NA NA $1,250.00 $05 Adoption - Livestock-Horse New $250.00 NA NA $250.00 $06 Adoption - Livestock-Swine New $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $07 Adoption - Llama/Alpaca New $400.00 NA NA $400.00 $0 8 Adoption - Psittacines and Cockatoos (Conure, Parrot, Cockatiel) New $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $0
9 Adoption - Rabbits/Guinea Pigs/Hamster New $10.00 $43.12 61% $17.00 $7 10 Adoption - Sheep/Goat New $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $011 Adoption - Small Fowl (Chicken, Dove, Pigeon, Turkey, Duck, Guineafowl) $8.00 $56.80 65% $20.00 $12
12 Adoption - Tortoise New $75.00 NA NA $75.00 $0
13 Adoption - Turtle - New $50.00 NA NA $50.00 $0
14 Dog Spay Small 81.00 $299.62 13% $260.00 $17915 Dog Spay Medium 81.00 $324.62 12% $285.00 $20416 Dog Spay Large 81.00 $379.62 10% $340.00 $259 17 Dog Neuter Small 81.00 $274.62 14% $235.00 $154
18 Dog Neuter Medium 81.00 $305.62 13% $266.00 $18519 Dog Neuter Large 81.00 $349.62 11% $310.00 $22920 Cat Spay 1 year and under 69.00 $247.62 16% $208.00 $13921 Cat Neuter 1 year and under 69.00 $205.62 19% $166.00 $9722 Cat Spay over 1 year 69.00 $242.62 16% $203.00 $13423 Cat Neuter over 1 year 69.00 $205.62 19% $166.00 $9724 Citation Processing Fee $7.00 $13.67 49% $7.00 $025 Daily Boarding - Cats/Dogs $12.00 $13.67 5% $13.00 $126 Daily Boarding - Large Livestock $26.00 $54.69 51% $27.00 $1 4 3
DRAFT

Animal Control
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 27 Daily Boarding - Small Livestock $12.00 $41.02 71% $12.00 $028 Deceased Animal Disposal - Brought in - Cat $12.00 $28.40 1% $28.00 $1629 Deceased Animal Disposal - Brought in - Dog $38.00 NA NA $38.00 $0 30 Dog License - Altered 1-4 dogs/each (1, 2, & 3 yr)* 23.00/42.00/64.00 NA NA 25.00/45.00/65.00 Varies 31 Dog License - Senior Citizen-altered 1-4 dogs/each (1, 2, & 3 yr)* 2.00/4.00/9.00 *1-3 Year License $14.72 39% 2.00/5.00/10.00 $032 Dog License - unaltered (1, 2, & 3 yr)* 103.00/181.00/273.0 0 *1-3 Year License NA NA 115.00/195.00/285.00 Varies 33 Emergency After-Hours Fees (hourly) fully burdened NA NA fully burdened $034 Owner Turn-In Euthanasia Resident $143.00 NA NA $150.00 $735 Owner Turn-In Euthanasia Non- Resident New NA NA $175.00 NA36 Impound - Cats - 1st Time $63.00 NA NA $63.00 $037 Impound - Cats - 2nd Time in 1 Year $94.00 NA NA $94.00 $038 Impound - Cats - 3rd Time in 1 Year $126.00 NA NA $126.00 $039 Impound - Dogs - 1st Time $81.00 NA NA $81.00 $0 40 Impound - Dogs - 2nd Time in 1
Year $126.00 NA NA $126.00 $0
41 Impound - Dogs - 3rd Time in 1 Year $163.00 NA NA $163.00 $042 Impound - Large Livestock - 1st Time $126.00 NA NA $126.00 $0
43 Impound - Large Livestock - 2nd
Time in 1 Year $310.00 NA NA $310.00 $0
4 4
DRAFT

Animal Control
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 44 Impound - Large Livestock - 3rd
Time in 1 Year $620.00 NA NA $620.00 $0
45 Impound - Small Livestock - 1st
Time $81.00 NA NA $81.00 $0
46 Impound - Small Livestock - 3rd
Time in 1 Year $164.00 NA NA $164.00 $0
47 Inspections $175.00 NA NA $178.00 $3
48 Apiary (Bee) Inspection New $33.04 0% $33.00 NA49 Late License Fee $32.00 NA NA $33.00 $1 50 Impound - Small Livestock - 2nd
Time in 1 Year $126.00 NA NA $126.00 $0
51 Livestock Transport: Non-Resident Impound Returns 125.00-1337.00 NA NA $127.00-1362.00 Varies52 Maintenance Fee $3.00 NA NA $3.00 $0 53 Microchip by Shelter $26.00 NA NA $26.00 $0
54 Microchip by Veterinarian $52.00 NA NA $52.00 $0
55 Microchip by Waiver $19.00 NA NA $19.00 $0
56 Non-Resident Fee New NA NA $25 Additional Charge NA57 Owner Pick Up - Small Live Stock $224.00 NA NA $224.00 $058 Owner Request Deceased Cat Pick Up $79.00 NA NA $80.00 $1
59 Owner Request Deceased Dog PickUp $79.00 NA NA $80.00 $1 60 Owner Request Deceased Large Livestock Pick-Up Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $061 Owner Request Deceased Small Livestock Pick-Up $155.00 $187.90 15% $160.00 $5 62 Owner Surrender - Cat/Dog (plus vaccine costs, if applicable) $142.00 NA NA $142.00 $063 Owner Surrender - Small Livestock $125.00 NA NA $125.00 $0 4 5
DRAFT

Animal Control
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 64 Owner surrender Rabbits/Guinea Pigs/Hamster New $56.46 38% $35.00 NA65 Owner surrender - Small Fowl (Chicken, Dove, Pigeon, Turkey, Duck, Guineafowl) $8.00 $56.46 82% $10.00 $2
66 Owner Surrender/pick up by AC - Cat/Dog including euthanasia fee $239.00 NA NA $239.00 $067 Quarantine Daily Board - Cat $21.00 $27.01 22% $21.00 $0 68 Quarantine Daily Board - Dog $31.00 NA NA $31.00 $069 Replacement Fee for Lost or Unreadable Tags $3.00 $14.72 66% $5.00 $270 Vaccination Fee - Cat $7.00 $28.40 65% $10.00 $3 71 Vaccination Fee - Dog $12.00 $28.40 47% $15.00 $372 Vicious Animal Appeal Actual + Deposit Deposit TBD NA NA Actual + Deposit $0 73 Vicious Animal Permit (new) $168.00 NA NA $175.00 $7 74 Vicious Animal Permit (renewal) $281.00 NA NA $286.00 $5 75 Wild/Exotic Animal Permit (new) $981.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $19 76 Wild/Exotic Animal Permit (renewal) $181.00 NA NA $181.00 $077 Ranch License $26.00 NA NA $26.00 $078 Ranch License Renewal $97.00 NA NA $97.00 $0 **NOTE: CA Food & Ag 30524.5: A public animal shelter shall not charge an adoption fee for a dog if the person adopting the dog presents a current and valid driver'slicense of ID with the word "VETERAN" printed on its face pursuant to Section 12811 of the vehicle code.Senior Citizens, Pet of the Month and animals in the shelter beyond 30 days will have a discount with reduced adoption fees.Any and all fines are mandated by County, State & Federal regulations/laws 4 6
DRAFT

Facilities Maintenance
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 The Arenas - 3737 Crestview Drive2 Alcohol Allowance Fee $412.00 $735.68 42% $425.00 $13 3 Application Processing Fee $51.00 $569.67 91% $53.00 $2 4 Asset Replacement Fund (per day) $6.00 $277.91 97% $7.00 $1 5 Banner Installation And Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $277.91 Variable Fully Burdened $0 6 Bleachers (per seat when there is a gate fee) $2.00 $724.28 100% $3.00 $1 7 Booking Change (All Facilities - The Arenas, The Hall, The Barn, The Turf, Parking Lots $31.00 $44.17 21% $35.00 $48 Camping - Dry (per day) $13.00 $668.94 98% $14.00 $1 9 Camping - Electric (1) 20/30/50 amp service (per day) 32.00/43.00/54.00 $668.94 Variable 35.00/45.00/55.00 Varies 10 Cleaning Fully Burdened NA NA $800.00 $011 Concessionaire Fee - Alcohol 15% of sales $668.94 Variable 15% of sales $0 12 Concessionaire Fee - Parking 15% of sales $668.94 Variable 15% of sales $0 13 Food Allowance Fee $412.00 $459.00 7% $425.00 $13
14 Grooming - Racing Pattern (per run request) $8.00 $334.47 97% $9.00 $1 15 Insurance Sales and Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $277.91 Variable Fully Burdened $0 16 Lights - Clark Arena (per hour) $10.00 $110.67 90% $11.00 $1 17 Lights - Moreno Arena (per hour) $26.00 $110.67 76% $27.00 $118 Portable - BBQ $103.00 $277.91 55% $125.00 $2219 Portable -70 Seat Bleachers Per Day Fully Burdened $100.00 $555.82 69% $175.00 NA 20 Portable -50 Seat Bleachers Per Day New $100.00 $555.82 73% $150.00 NA21 Portable - Stalls Fully Burdened $250.00 $666.49 96% $26.00 NA 22 Rental Fee - Clark Arena (Friday-Sunday, up to 9 hours) (per day) $779.00 500.00 - 5,000.00 NA NA $803.00 $24 23 Rental Fee - Clark Arena Special Consideration Groups* (Friday-Sunday, up to 9 hours) (per day) $504.00 500.00 - 5,000.00 NA NA $520.00 $16 24 Rental Fee - Clark/Moreno Arenas (Monday-Thursday, 2 hour min) (per hour) $210.00 500.00 - 5,000.00 $447.59 52% $217.00 $7 25 Rental Fee - Grounds Only (per day) $547.00 $500.00 NA NA $564.00 $17 26 Rental Fee - Moreno Arena (Friday-Sunday, up to 9 hours) (per day) $975.00 100.00 - 5,000.00 NA NA $1,005.00 $30 27 Rental Fee - Moreno Arena Special Consideration Groups* (Friday- Sunday, up to 9 hours) (per day) New 500.00 - 5,000.00 NA NA $604.00 NA 28 Rental Fee - Moreno Arena Holding Pens (per day) $252.00 $400.00 $447.59 42% $260.00 $8 29 Rental Fee - Stall (per stall) $26.00 $666.49 96% $27.00 $1 30 Rental Fee - Warm-Up & Exercise Arenas (per day) $58.00 $100.00 $334.47 82% $60.00 $231 Restrooms - Exterior (per day) 71.00-592.00 $200.00 NA NA 71.00-592.00 $032 Restrooms - Showers (per day) NEW $36.00 $167.23 77% $38.00 $233 Shuttle Bus Service (4 hours) NEW Fully Burdened $334.47 Variable Fully Burdened $0 34 Supplemental Staff Support, Operations, Maintenance and Equipment Fully Burdened $558.27 Variable Fully Burdened $0 35 Trainer Hours (by reservation, up to 3 hours) (per horse) $26.00 $50.00 $668.94 93% $50.00 $2436 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/ Electrical 10 x 10, 20/30/50 amp) (Charge after 2 vendors) 46.00/57.00/68.00 $779.61 Variable 50.00/60.00/70.00 Varies 37 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/o Electrical 10 x 10) (Charge after 2 vendors) $13.00 $779.61 98% $14.00 $1 38 Vendor Booth Fee (for city event) 2.00-208.00 $666.49 Variable 2.00-208.00 $0 4 7
DRAFT

Facilities Maintenance
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 39 The Hall - 90 Sixth Street40 Alcohol Allowance Fee $412.00 $500.48 15% $425.00 $1341 Application Processing Fee $51.00 $334.47 84% $53.00 $242 Asset Replacement Fund (per day) $6.00 $277.91 97% $7.00 $1 43 Camping - Dry (per day) $13.00 $499.25 97% $14.00 $1 44 Camping - Electric (1) 20/30/50 amp service (per day) 32.00/43.00/54.00 $668.94 Variable 35.00/45.00/55.00 Varies 45 Cleaning Fully Burdened $569.67 30% $400.00 $0
46 Concessionaire Fee - Alcohol 15% of sales $499.25 Variable 15% of sales $0 47 Concessionaire Fee - Parking NEW 15% of sales $555.82 Variable 15% of sales $048 Event Inspection Fee Fully Burdened $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 49 Food Allowance Fee $412.00 $459.00 7% $425.00 $13
50 Insurance Sales and Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $249.63 Variable Fully Burdened $0 51 Portable - BBQ $103.00 $150.00 $277.91 55% $125.00 $22 52 Rental Fee - Kitchen (per hour) $219.00 200.00 - 500.00 $334.47 32% $226.00 $7 53 Rental Fee - The Hall up to 200 attendees (Saturdays, 8 hour min) (per hour) $189.00 300.00 - 2,500.00 $447.59 56% $195.00 $6 54 Rental Fee - The Hall 201 to 400 attendees (Saturdays, 8 hour min) (per hour) $209.00 300.00 - 2,500.00 $502.93 57% $216.00 $7 55 Rental Fee - The Hall (Sunday - Friday, 4 hour min) (per hour) $72.00 300.00 - 2,500.00 $447.59 83% $75.00 $3 56 Restrooms - Exterior 71.00-592.00 $200.00 $221.35 Variable 71.00-592.00 $0 57 Security (hourly, per guard) $36.00 $334.47 89% $38.00 $258 Shuttle Bus Service (4 hours) NEW Fully Burdened $447.59 Variable Fully Burdened $0 59 Supplemental Staff Support, Operations, Maintenance and Equipment Fully Burdened $668.94 Variable Fully Burdened $0 60 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/ Electrical 10 x 10, 20/30/50 amp) (Charge after 2 vendors) 46.00/57.00/68.00 $668.94 Variable 46.00/57.00/68.00 $0 61 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/o Electrical 10 x 10) (Charge after 2 vendors) $13.00 $668.94 98% $14.00 $1 62 Vendor Booth Fee (for city event) 2.00-208.00 $555.82 Variable 2.00-208.00 $063 The Barn - 96 Sixth Street 64 Alcohol Allowance Fee $412.00 $500.48 15% $425.00 $13 65 Application Processing Fee $51.00 $334.47 84% $53.00 $2 66 Asset Replacement Fund (per day) $6.00 $277.91 97% $7.00 $1 67 Bleachers (per seat when there is a gate fee) $5.00 $609.93 99% $6.00 $1 68 Cleaning Fully Burdened $569.67 12% $500.00 $0
69 Concessionaire Fee - Alcohol 15% of sales $668.94 Variable 15% of sales $070 Concessionaire Fee - Parking 15% of sales $668.94 Variable 15% of sales $0 71 Event Inspection Fee Fully Burdened $581.65 Variable Fully Burdened $0 72 Food Allowance Fee $412.00 $569.67 25% $425.00 $13
73 Insurance Sales and Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $334.47 Variable Fully Burdened $0 74 Livestock Pens - Large (per day) $15.00 $200.00 $609.93 97% $16.00 $1 75 Livestock Pens - Small (per day) $10.00 $200.00 $553.37 98% $11.00 $176 Portable - BBQ $103.00 $150.00 $277.91 55% $125.00 $22 4 8
DRAFT

Facilities Maintenance
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 77 Portable - 70 Seat Bleachers $206.00 $100.00 $555.82 69% $175.00 -$31 78 Portable -50 Seat Bleachers Per Day New $100.00 $555.82 73% $150.00 NA 79 Portable - Stalls Fully Burdened $100.00 $668.94 Variable Fully Burdened $0 80 Rental Fee - The Barn (Friday - Sunday, 100 to 600 attendees, 8 hour min) (per hour) $309.00 $500.00 $447.59 29% $319.00 $10 81 Rental Fee - The Barn (Friday - Sunday, 601 to 1200 attendees, 8 hour min) (per hour) $412.00 $1,000.00 $558.27 24% $425.00 $1382 Rental Fee - The Barn (Friday - Sunday, 1200 to 1800 attendees, 8 hour min) (per hour) $617.00 $2,500.00 NA NA $636.00 $1983 Rental Fee - The Barn (Monday - Thursday, 4 hour min) (50% discount per hour) 50% discount $500.00 NA NA 50% discount $0 84 Security (hourly, per guard) $36.00 $334.47 89% $38.00 $2 85 Shuttle Bus Service (4 hours) Fully Burdened $200.00 $447.59 Variable Fully Burdened $0 86 Supplemental Staff Support, Operations, Maintenance and Equipment Fully Burdened $668.94 Variable Fully Burdened $087 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/ Electrical 10 x 10, 20/30/50 amp) (Charge after 2 vendors) 46.00/57.00/68.00 $668.94 Variable 46.00/57.00/68.00 $0 88 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/o Electrical 10 x 10) (Charge after more than 2 vendors) $13.00 $668.94 98% $14.00 $1 89 Vendor Booth Fee (for city event) 2.00-208.00 $100.00 $555.82 Variable 2.00-208.00 $0 90 The Turf - 97 Sixth Street91 Alcohol Allowance Fee $412.00 $666.49 36% $425.00 $13 92 Application Processing Fee $50.00 $334.47 84% $52.00 $2 93 Asset Replacement Fund (per day) $6.00 $277.91 97% $7.00 $1 94 Camping - Dry (per day) $13.00 $388.58 96% $14.00 $1 95 Camping - Electric (1) 20/30/50 amp service (per day) 32.00/43.00/54.00 $100.00 $558.27 Variable 35.00/45.00/55.00 Varies 96 Concessionaire Fee - Parking 15% of sales $499.25 Variable 15% of sales $0 97 Event Inspection Fee Fully Burdened $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 98 Food Allowance Fee $412.00 $499.25 15% $425.00 $13
99 Insurance Sales and Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $249.63 Variable Fully Burdened $0 100 Portable - BBQ $103.00 $150.00 $277.91 55% $125.00 $22101 Portable - Bleachers Fully Burdened $100.00 $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 102 Portable - Restrooms Fully Burdened $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 103 Portable - Stalls Fully Burdened $100.00 $442.69 Variable Fully Burdened $0 104 Rental Fee - The Turf (per day) $309.00 $447.59 29% $319.00 $10 105 Security (hourly, per guard) $36.00 $334.47 89% $38.00 $2106 Shuttle Bus Service (4 hours) Fully Burdened $200.00 $334.47 Variable Fully Burdened $0 107 Supplemental Staff Support, Operations, Maintenance and Equipment Fully Burdened $668.94 Variable Fully Burdened $0 108 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/ Electrical 10 x 10, 20/30/50 amp) (Charge after 2 vendors) 46.00/57.00/68.00 $668.94 Variable 46.00/57.00/68.00 $0 109 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/o Electrical 10 x 10) (Charge after 2 vendors) $13.00 $668.94 98% $14.00 $1 110 Vendor Booth Fee (for city event) 2.00-201.00 $100.00 $555.82 Variable 2.00-201.00 $0 111 The Parking Lots (includes lot @ 6th and California)112 Application Processing Fee $51.00 $277.91 81% $53.00 $2 49 DRAFT

Facilities Maintenance
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Deposit Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 113 Asset Replacement Fund (per day) $6.00 $277.91 97% $7.00 $1 114 Camping - Dry (per day) $13.00 $445.14 97% $14.00 $1 115 Camping - Electric (1) 20/30/50 amp service (per day) 32.00/43.00/54.00 $445.14 Variable 35.00/45.00/55.00 Varies 116 Concessionaire Fee - Parking NEW 15% of sales $558.27 Variable 15% of sales $0117 Event Inspection Fee Fully Burdened $499.25 Variable Fully Burdened $0118 Insurance Sales and Administrative Fees Fully Burdened $277.91 Variable Fully Burdened $0 119 Portable - BBQ $103.00 $150.00 $277.91 55% $125.00 $22120 Portable - Bleachers Fully Burdened $100.00 $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 121 Portable - Stalls Fully Burdened $100.00 $555.82 Variable Fully Burdened $0 122 Rental Fee - Corydon Parking Lots/Staging Area (half lot until open) (per day) $46.00 $336.92 86% $48.00 $2 123 Rental Fee - Satellite Parking Lot for On Site Event (per day) $93.00 $447.59 79% $96.00 $3124 Rental Fee - Satellite Parking Lot for Off Site Event (per day) $535.00 NA NA $552.00 $17 125 Security (hourly, per guard) $36.00 $221.35 83% $38.00 $2126 Shuttle Bus Service (4 hours) Fully Burdened $334.47 Variable Fully Burdened $0 127 Supplemental Staff Support, Operations, Maintenance and Equipment Fully Burdened $668.94 Variable Fully Burdened $0 128 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/ Electrical 10 x 10, 20/30/50 amp) (Charge after 2 vendors) 47.00/58.00/68.00 $668.94 Variable 47.00/58.00/68.00 $0 129 Vendor Booth Fee (Food or Retail w/o Electrical 10 x 10) (Charge after 2 vendors) $13.00 $668.94 98% $14.00 $1 130 Vendor Booth Fee (for city event) 2.00-208.00 $555.82 Variable 2.00-208.00 $0131 EV Charging Fees132 Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Fee $0.20 per kWh Parking is free while charging is in process NA NA $0.50 $0 133 Idle Parking Fee $3.00 per hour first hour of free parking NA NA $6.00 $3134 First hour for users actively charging Free first hour NA NA Free $0 Consideration Groups by Resolution No. 2010-59 of the Norco City Council, will continue to be subsidized with reduced or waived fees. - Residents and local non- profit groups will be entitled to a discount at Nellie Weaver Hall on venue rental fee only. The discount is 25% off for residents and 10% for businesses.Only one discount use per rental allowed.All other organizations and events will be charged full fees based on the fee policy and fee schedule. 5 0
DRAFT

Ingalls Event Center
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 George A. Ingalls Veterans Memorial Plaza2 Veterans Brick Paver Fees3 4"x8" Paver Brick $100.00 each NA NA $100.00 $0 4 8"x8" Larger Brick Paver $200.00 each NA NA $200.00 $0 5 8"x8" Larger Brick Paver with Medallion $250.00 each NA NA $250.00 $0 5 1
DRAFT

Consideration Group Impact
Youth Sports Groups • Pay 44% of light fees which increase 14% incrementally until 100%
American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) • Pay 100% of custodial fees Norco Junior All American Football (NJAAF) • Pay 100% of health dept fees Norco Little League (NLL) • Pay 100% of propane gas
Norco Girls Softball (NGS) • Pay 100% of infield maintenance --NLL, NGS • Pay 100% of field restoration (which is not covered by City Contractor) after season -- AYSO, NJAAF
Equestrian Show Clubs
Saddle and Harness
Ranglers
Modjeska Mavericks
Pacific Coast Miniature Horse Club
Lunde Enterprises
So Cal Miniature Horse Clubs
Equestrian Community Clubs
Saddle Sore Riders
Norco Horsemen's Association
First Responder Training (The Areans & East Pad Only)
Riv. and OC Sheriffs Mounted Enforcement No Fees
Cal Fire Training Exercises No Fees
Others
CNUSD/Norco College
Government Agencies (Federal, State, County)
Boy Scouts/Girl Scouts
Horseweek Committee
Fair Commitee
4H/FFA
Norco Mounted Posse Committee
Norco Cowgirl Drill Team
Norco Junior Horsemen's Association
In the event the original qualifying organization relinquishes its event to another community organization, the successor organization shall not be entitled to the same subsidized rates, and the event shall be subject to standard rental fees at a substantially higher rate.

Norco residents and Norco-based businesses shall be eligible for a facility rental fee discount upon presentation of valid government-issued photo identification reflecting a current Norco address. Residents shall receive a 25% discount and businesses a 10% discount on facility rental fees. These discounts shall not apply to administrative fees, additional staffing charges, or fees charged by third-party contractors.

In addition, individual military veterans and first responders shall be eligible for a 15% discount on facility rental fees, subject to the presentation of appropriate identification verifying such status.

Only one discount may be applied per rental, and the highest qualifying discount shall prevail. Discounts apply exclusively to facility rental fees and do not extend to ancillary or third-party service costs.

The arena fees for these clubs will remain the same at the current published rates until reevaluation for FY 25/26.

The arena fees for these clubs will remain the same at the current published rates until reevaluation for FY 25/26.

All groups will be charged 100% of direct costs for all services or as indicated by Licenscing Agreement with the Norco City Council.

Pursuant to resolution adopted by the Norco City Council, organizations designated as Special Consideration Groups shall continue to receive subsidized use of City facilities through reduced or waived fees, as provided in Resolution No. XXX and the annually adopted fee schedule approved by the City Council. 52 DRAFT

Finance Department
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Collection Fee Actual Cost NA NA Actual Cost $0
2 Late Payment Penalty for Administrative and Parking Citations $34.00 NA NA $34.00 $0
3 Live Scan – Fee plus Applicable DOJ and FBI Charges $41.00 $45.13 9% $41.00 $0 4 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.25 NA NA $0.25 $05 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.50 NA NA $0.50 $06 Reproduction (larger than 11" x 17") - Black/White or Color $10.00 $10.00 0% $10.00 $0 7 Returned Check Fee $48.00 Civil Code 1719 NA NA First Check $25/Subsequent Check $35 -$23 8 Yard Sale Permit (for three days only, once every three months) $10.00 $41.44 76% $10.00 $09 Fine for Unauthorized Yard Sale (NMC 1.05.030 d) 100.00-500.00 NA NA 100.00-500.00 $0 10 Credit Card Processing Fee New 2% 0% 2% NA
5 3
DRAFT

Finance Department - Business License Fees
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Business License Processing Fees2 In Town, Commercial or Industrial Applicants $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $0 3 Farmer's Market (Indoor) $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $0
4 Farmer's Market (Outdoor) $31.00 $194.51 77% $45.00 $14 5 Farmer's Market (Indoor) - City Facilities $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $0 6 Farmer's Market (Outdoor) - City Facilities $31.00 $132.92 66% $45.00 $147 Massage Business $31.00 $185.92 6% $175.00 $1448 Massage Technician $31.00 $185.92 22% $145.00 $114 9 Not-for-Profit/Exempt Business (Fixed Location In Town) $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $010 Space Rental $31.00 $194.51 77% $45.00 $14 11 In Town, Home Occupation Applicants $66.00 $194.51 66% $66.00 $012 Agriculture/Farm $66.00 $194.51 66% $66.00 $0 13 Animal Keeping $66.00 $265.08 75% $66.00 $0
14 Not-for-Profit/Exempt Business (Fixed Location In Town) $66.00 $194.51 66% $66.00 $015 Out of Town Applicants $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $1416 Not-for-Profit/Exempt Business $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $1417 Out of Town Contractor (A/B or C/D) $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $1418 Out of Town Delivery Vehicle $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $1419 Out of Town Real Estate $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $1420 Rental Property $31.00 $53.39 16% $45.00 $14 21 Special Business Applicants22 Bingo $31.00 $150.33 70% $45.00 $1423 Duplicate License $5.00 $17.80 44% $10.00 $524 Moved/Changed License $31.00 $176.72 75% $45.00 $1425 Swap Meet Operator $31.00 $115.12 61% $45.00 $14 26 Swap Meet Operator $31.00 $176.72 75% $45.00 $14
27 Sidewalk Vendor $66.00 $212.46 69% $66.00 $0
28 Solicitor $31.00 $176.72 75% $45.00 $1429 Special Event Vendor $17.00 $35.59 44% $20.00 $3 30 Name Change New $176.72 94% $10.00 NA
31 Business License Tax 32 Business License Tax - Not-for-Profit/Exempt Organization $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $033 Business License Tax - Set by Statute varies NA NA varies $0 5 4
DRAFT

Finance Department - Business License Fees
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 34 SB 1186 (per application) $4.00 NA NA $4.00 $035 Business License Renewal Processing Fee $24.00 $38.99 38% $24.00 $036 Business License Fire Operation Permit Fees **37 Annual Fire Inspection Fees 38 Small Businesses – 1 – 4,999 Sq. Ft. $90.00 $195.36 54% $90.00 $039 Medium Businesses – 5,000 – 9,999 Sq. Ft. $177.00 $293.03 40% $177.00 $0 40 Large Businesses – > 10,000 Sq. Ft. $445.00 $683.74 35% $445.00 $0 41 Public Assembly (50 to 99 occupancy) $267.00 NA NA $267.00 $042 Public Assembly (100 and greater occupancy) $489.00 NA NA $489.00 $0 ** See Fire Operation Permit Fees
5 5
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Fire Administration, General2 Non-Compliance Administrative Fine (per occurrence) $310.00 NA NA $310.00 $0 3 Vacant Lot Weed Abatement - Contractor's Charge, plus 100% Admin Cost of Service NA NA Cost of Service $0 4 Lien Release Request - First Lien $390.00 NA NA $390.00 $0 5 Lien Release Request - Additional Lien $390.00 NA NA $390.00 $0 6 Incident Report Request Fee (prior to 01/01/12) $0.25 NA NA $0.25 $0 7 Reproduction (Up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.25 NA NA $0.25 $0 8 Reproduction (Up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.50 NA NA $0.50 $09 Reproduction (Larger than 11" x 17") - Black/White or Color $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $0 10 Engine Company, General11 Engine Company Standby (Personnel Plus Equipment Time) Cost of Service NA NA Cost of Service $012 First or Second False Alarm Set by Ordinance NA NA Set by Ordinance $013 Third Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period Set by Ordinance NA NA Set by Ordinance $0 14 Fourth Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period Set by Ordinance NA NA Set by Ordinance $015 Fifth Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period Set by Ordinance NA NA Set by Ordinance $0 16 Prevention Standby Cost of Service NA NA Cost of Service $017 Development Fees18 Development Plan Check 19 Fire Sprinkler Systems20 New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System Base Fee + $560.00 $672.47 0% $672.00 $11221 New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System (Sprinkler heads up to 999 fee) 0 - 999 (Per head) $7.00 Per head $7.81 10% $7.00 $0 22 New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System (Sprinkler heads over 999 and up to 5000 fee) 1,000 - 5,000 (Per head) $3.00 Per head $3.91 23% $3.00 $0 23 New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System (Sprinkler heads over 5000 heads fee) > 5,000 (Per head) $2.00 Per head NA NA $2.00 $0 24 New 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System Base Fee Per Model + $279.00 $336.23 0% $336.00 $57 25 New 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System - Per each plan type Per Sprinkler head $7.00 $7.81 10% $7.00 $0 26 TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System Base Fee + $420.00 $504.35 0% $504.00 $8427 TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System Per Sprinkler head $7.00 $7.81 10% $7.00 $028 TI 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System Base Fee + $199.00 $237.60 0% $237.00 $3829 TI 13D Residential Fire Sprinkler System - Per each plan type Per Sprinkler head $7.00 $7.81 10% $7.00 $0 30 Water Systems Permits31 New Underground Fire Line Per Connection $583.00 $678.10 0% $678.00 $9532 Fire Pump Per Pump $1,208.00 $1,397.85 0% $1,397.00 $189 5 6
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 33 Emergency Underground Fire Line Repair $757.00 $873.46 0% $873.00 $11634 Above Ground Tank (Temporary Water Supply/Construction) $540.00 $629.27 0% $629.00 $89 35 Standpipes/Hose Valves $583.00 $678.10 0% $678.00 $9536 Fire Alarm 37 New Alarm System Base Fee + $560.00 $672.47 0% $672.00 $11238 New Alarm System (Per initiating or notification device up to 999 devices) 0 - 999 devices $6.00 $7.81 10% $7.00 $1 39 New Alarm System (Per initiating or notification device 1000-5000 device fee ) 1,000 - 5,000 devices $3.00 $3.91 23% $3.00 $040 New Alarm System (Per initiating or notification device 5,000 and above fee) > 5,001 $2.00 NA NA $2.00 $041 TI Fire Alarm System Base Fee + $420.00 $504.35 0% $504.00 $84 42 TI Fire Alarm System (Per initiating or notification device) Per device $7.00 $7.81 10% $7.00 $0 43 Water flow (Monitoring) Alarm system only Per system $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $5844 Fire Protection Systems45 Special Extinguishing Systems (FM200, Dry Chem, Spray Mist, etc.) Per system $728.00 $853.42 0% $853.00 $12546 Smoke Control System - Rationale, Analysis and Plan Review Per system $2,074.00 $2,419.38 0% $2,419.00 $34547 Other Systems48 Hood & Duct Automatic Extinguishing System Per System $447.00 $517.19 0% $517.00 $70 49 Ovens, Industrial baking or drying, furnace or kiln special equip. Per oven $331.00 $385.25 0% $385.00 $5450 Dust Collection Special Equipment Per system $376.00 $439.05 0% $439.00 $6351 Solar Photovoltaic System (charged hourly or a fraction thereof) Residential $187.00 $224.16 0% $224.00 $3752 Solar Photovoltaic System (charged hourly or a fraction thereof) Commercial $187.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $23253 Regulated Refrigeration System54 Refrigeration system < 500 lbs. Per system $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $58 55 Refrigeration system > or = 500 lbs. Per system $447.00 $517.19 0% $517.00 $7056 Spray Booth Automatic Extinguishing System Per Booth/System $483.00 $558.21 0% $558.00 $75 57 Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG) Special System Per system $629.00 NA NA $629.00 $0 58 Gas Systems (Med Gas, Industrial Gas, IPG,) Per system $583.00 NA NA $583.00 $0 59 Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Per system $534.00 $614.87 0% $614.00 $8060 Fireworks Display (Includes 4 hours of inspection, additional standby charged separately) Actual Cost $787.00 $1,005.58 0% $1,005.00 $21861 Generator/Cell Sites Per Gen/Site $827.00 NA NA $827.00 $0 62 Development Plan Check 63 Battery Systems (Commercial charging system) Per System $564.00 $720.35 0% $720.00 $156 64 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Review65 Chemical Classification Disclosure Review <10 Chemicals $453.00 $531.59 0% $531.00 $78 66 Chemical Classification Disclosure Review 10 - 25 Chemicals $634.00 $741.34 0% $741.00 $107 67 Chemical Classification Disclosure Review 26 - 100 Chemicals $1,006.00 $1,180.47 0% $1,180.00 $174 5 7
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 68 Chemical Classification Disclosure Review >100 Chemicals $1,392.00 $1,633.45 0% $1,633.00 $24169 High Piled Storage70 High Piled Combustible Storage $634.00 $741.34 0% $741.00 $10771 Access and Water Supply72 Access and Water Supply Only - Commercial Construction Inspection Deposit may be required $447.00 $517.19 0% $517.00 $7073 Base Time for One Lot $144.00 $162.14 0% $162.00 $1874 Each Additional Lot $25.00 $33.21 1% $33.00 $875 Fuel Modification Plan (3 hour minimum, hourly thereafter) Deposit may be required $560.00 $867.82 0% $867.00 $307 76 Tanks (Other than Above Ground Water Tank)77 Underground Storage Tanks Install or Removal $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $58 78 Aboveground Storage Tank Install or Removal $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $5879 Alterations to Gas Stations (No tank alterations) $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $58 80 Fuel Modification for Fire Severity Zones81 Fuel Modification Plan/Insp (4 hour minimum, hourly thereafter, plus City Atty) Deposit may be required $734.00 $867.82 0% $867.00 $133 82 Other Fees - Includes Pre-Development Reviews83 Work without Approval or Permit Per occurrence $261.00 $293.03 0% $293.00 $3284 Fire Standby Per hour $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21 85 Annexation Agreement $94.00 $105.49 0% $105.00 $11
86 Revised Tentative Parcel Map $445.00 $500.11 0% $500.00 $5587 Alternate Materials and Methods (4 hrs. minimum, hourly thereafter) Deposit may be required $695.00 $896.62 0% $896.00 $20188 Consultant Fire Plan Review (*future rate TBD if contracted)89 3rd Review and subsequent submittals Per hour $174.00 $224.16 0% $224.00 $5090 Expedited/Overtime Plan Review Per hour $261.00 $336.23 0% $336.00 $75 91 Over the Counter/Misc. Revisions Plan Review Per review $130.00 $168.12 0% $168.00 $38 92 Development Plan Check 93 Architectural/Development by Square Footage94 Residential and Multi-family Residential Uses9596 0 - 1,999 sq. ft. $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $5897 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft. $414.00 $482.44 0% $482.00 $68 98 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft. $540.00 $629.27 0% $629.00 $8999 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft. $631.00 $734.14 0% $734.00 $103100 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft. $811.00 $943.90 0% $943.00 $132 All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC group R or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this fee schedule 5 8
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 101 50,000 - 100,000 sq. ft. $990.00 $1,153.65 0% $1,153.00 $163 102 > 100,000 sq. ft. $1,244.00 $1,448.11 0% $1,448.00 $204103 Hazardous Use by square footage104 All newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H105 0 - 1999 sq. ft. $381.00 $444.68 0% $444.00 $63106 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft. $612.00 $715.12 0% $715.00 $103 107 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft. $843.00 $981.65 0% $981.00 $138 108 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft. $1,074.00 $1,252.09 0% $1,252.00 $178109 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft. $1,304.00 $1,518.63 0% $1,518.00 $214110 50,000 - 100,000 sq. ft. $1,533.00 $1,787.11 0% $1,787.00 $254111 > 100,000 sq. ft. $1,865.00 $2,173.29 0% $2,173.00 $308112 Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses by square footage113114 0 - 1,999 sq. ft. $361.00 $419.51 0% $419.00 $58115 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft. $414.00 $482.44 0% $482.00 $68 116 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft. $540.00 $629.27 0% $629.00 $89 117 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft. $631.00 $734.14 0% $734.00 $103118 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft. $811.00 $943.90 0% $943.00 $132119 50,000 - 100,000 sq. ft. $990.00 $1,153.65 0% $1,153.00 $163 120 > 100,000 sq. ft. $1,244.00 $1,448.11 0% $1,448.00 $204121 Development Plan Check 122 Buildings for all Commercial Uses123124 0-1.999 sq. ft. $361.00 $419.51 0% $420.00 $59 125 2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $414.00 $482.44 0% $482.00 $68126 5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $540.00 $629.27 0% $629.00 $89127 10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $631.00 $734.14 0% $734.00 $103 128 25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $811.00 $943.90 0% $943.00 $132 129 50,000-100,000 sq. ft. $990.00 $1,153.65 0% $1,153.00 $163130 >100,000 sq. ft. $1,244.00 $1,448.11 0% $1,448.00 $204131 New Construction, Additions and Major Remodels 132 Tenant Improvement The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not complete or occupiable.The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed where the interior is completed and habitable. 59 DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 133134 0-1,999 sq. ft. $361.00 $419.51 0% $420.00 $59
135 2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $414.00 $482.44 0% $482.00 $68
136 5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $540.00 $629.27 0% $629.00 $89137 10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $631.00 $734.14 0% $734.00 $103 138 25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $811.00 $943.90 0% $943.00 $132 139 50,000-100,000 sq. ft. $990.00 $1,153.65 0% $1,153.00 $163140 >100,000 sq. ft. $1,244.00 $1,448.11 0% $1,448.00 $204141 Fire Life-Safety Inspections (Post-Development)142 Fire Annual Inspection (includes one re-inspection)143 Small Businesses – 1 – 4,999 Sq. Ft. $87.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $108 144 Medium Businesses – 5,000 – 9,999 Sq. Ft. $174.00 $293.03 0% $293.00 $119145 Large Businesses – > 10,000 Sq. Ft. $434.00 $683.74 0% $683.00 $249146 2nd re-inspection $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21147 3rd and subsequent Re-inspections $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21 148 Fire Watch Inspection Per hour $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21149 Fire Hydrant Inspection/Water Flow Witness Per hour $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21150 Special Event Permit (Includes review and 1 hour inspection) $87.00 $307.43 0% $307.00 $220151 Tent/Canopy Permit (400-10,000 sq) $87.00 $209.76 0% $209.00 $122152 Tent/Canopy Permit (10,001+ sq ft) New $307.43 0% $307.00 NA153 Hourly Rates154 Inspection $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21155 Plan Review $174.00 $224.16 0% $224.00 $50156 Supplemental Inspection Fee (per 1 hour or potion thereof) $174.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $21 157 Supplemental Plan review (per 1 hour or portion thereof) $174.00 $224.16 0% $224.00 $50 158 After Hours or Emergency call-out (2 hr. minimum = $448) $173.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $22 159 Construction Re-inspection Fee $173.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $22 160 Operational Fees161 Renewable Permit Fees (Issued at Annual Fire-Life Safety Inspection)162 Aerosol Products (Level 2 & 3) CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $31163 Candles Open Flame in Assembly Occupancy Areas CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $31164 Carnivals and Fairs CFC 105 Permit $110.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $85
165 Cellulose Nitrate Storage CFC 105 Permit $74.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $121 Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as for non-residential classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere. 6 0
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 166 Combustible Dust Producing Operations CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4167 Combustible Fiber Storage CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0168 Combustible Materials Storage CFC 105 Permit $74.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $23169 Compressed Gases CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0170 Cryogens CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0171 Dry Cleaning Plant > or = 2 Units CFC 105 Permit $222.00 $293.03 0% $293.00 $71172 Explosives or Blasting agents (se or transportation of) CFC 105 Permit $148.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $47173 Explosives or Blasting agents, use or disposal of CFC 105 Permit $348.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $42174 Fireworks, Manufacture, Compound, Storage CFC 105 Permit $296.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $94175 Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside < 60 gallons CFC 105 Permit $74.00 $84.00 0% $84.00 $10 176 Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside > or = 60 gallons CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0177 Flammable/Combustible Liquids Outside Above Ground Tank Per tank/105 Permit $110.00 NA NA $110.00 $0 178 Flammable/Combustible Liquids Outside Underground Tank Per tank/105 Permit $110.00 NA NA $110.00 $0 179 Fuel Dispensing CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4180 Hazardous Materials CFC 105 Permit $148.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $242
181 High Piled Combustible Storage (0-5,000 sq ft) CFC 105 Permit 148.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 -$51182 High Piled Combustible Storage(5,001-50,000 sq ft) CFC 105 Permit 148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0183 High Piled Combustible Storage(50,001-100,000 sq ft) CFC 105 Permit 148.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $47 184 High Piled Combustible Storage(100,001-500,000 sq ft) CFC 105 Permit 148.00 $293.03 0% $293.00 $145 185 High Piled Combustible Storage(>500,000 sq ft) CFC 105 Permit 148.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $242 6 1
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 186 Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG), Storage, Use and Dispensing CFC 105 Permit $37.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $60 187 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles or equipment in an Assembly area CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0188 Lumber Yard/Woodworking Plants CFC 105 Permit $196.00 $195.36 0% $196.00 $0189 Magnesium operation CFC 105 Permit $73.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $24190 Malls: Covered and Uncovered CFC 105 Permit $216.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $174
191 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0192 Motor Vehicle Repair CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4193 Ovens - Industrial baking or drying, furnace or kiln special equip. CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4194 Place of Assembly (0-100) CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $31195 Place of Assembly (101-300) CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $146.52 0% $146.00 $80196 Place of Assembly (301-1,000) CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $195.36 0% $195.00 $129197 Place of Assembly (>1,001) CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $293.03 0% $293.00 $227198 Pyrotechnic special effects material/model rockets CFC 105 Permit $348.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $42199 Refrigeration Equipment < 500 lbs. CFC 105 Permit $148.00 NA NA $148.00 $0200 Refrigeration Equipment > or = 500 lbs. CFC 105 Permit $296.00 NA NA $296.00 $0201 Special Amusement Buildings CFC 105 Permit $222.00 $390.71 0% $390.00 $168 202 Spraying (Booth) or Dipping Operations CFC 105 Permit $66.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $31 203 Tire Storage CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4204 Welding and Cutting Operation CFC 105 Permit $73.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $24205 Wood Products Storage CFC 105 Permit $93.00 $97.68 1% $97.00 $4 6 2
DRAFT

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Item No. Title Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 206 False Alarm Fees Response207 each incident New NA NA 175.00 NA208 3rd response in a 365-consecutive day period. New NA NA 200.00 NA209 4th response in a 365-consecutive day period. New NA NA 300.00 NA210 5th response in a 365-consecutive day period. New NA NA 500.00 NA211 Fire Standby - FSS (position hourly rate per hour) New per hour $224.16 0% $224.00 NA212 Fire Standby - FSI (position hourly rate per hour) New per hour $195.36 0% $195.00 NA 6 3
DRAFT

Planning Division
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 ABC Letter of Necessity $269.00 $381.46 0% $381.00 $112 2 Additional Animal Units per Section 18.35.06 or 18.13.08 (Fee + Public Noticing Fee + Animal Control Costs) $94.00 $103.82 1% $103.00 $9 3 Architectural & Photometric Review $646.00 $682.94 0% $682.00 $364 Accessory Building Use Permit $4,073.00 $4,136.77 0% $4,136.00 $635 Developer or Major Permit Appeal to Planning Commission $2,226.00 $2,675.60 0% $2,675.00 $449
6 Resident or Minor Appeal to Planning Commission* $221.00 * Appeal fee will be
refunded if the decision is reversed on appeal
$244.12 0% $244.00 $23
7 Developer or Major Appeal to City Council* $1,739.00
* Appeal fee will be
refunded if the decision is reversed on appeal
$1,853.66 0% $1,853.00 $114
8 Resident or Minor Appeal to City Council* $677.00
* Appeal fee will be
refunded if the decision is reversed on appeal
$746.77 0% $746.00 $69
9 Categorical Exemption (per application) $168.00 $191.57 0% $191.00 $2310 Commercial Vehicle Exemption Permit $306.00 $680.63 0% $680.00 $37411 Commercial Vehicle Exemption Permit-Renewal $90.00 $121.00 1% $120.00 $30 12 Continuance (Fee plus postage and publishing costs) $1,565.00 $1,673.26 0% $1,673.00 $108 13 Conditional Use Permit – Annual Inspection – Sale of Alcohol $149.00 $208.74 0% $208.00 $59 14 Conditional Use Permit – Annual Inspection – All Others $149.00 $208.74 0% $208.00 $5915 Conditional Use Permit – Miniaturized Pigs in R-1-10 Zone $491.00 NA NA $491.00 $016 Conditional Use Permit – Miniaturized Pigs in R-1-10 Zone (Renewal) $90.00 NA NA $90.00 $0 17 Conditional Use Permit – Minor, plus animal-control costs (Resident) (except Additional Animal Units, refer to that fee) $2,231.00 $3,182.33 0% $3,182.00 $951
18 Conditional Use Permit – Minor, plus animal-control costs (Developer) $4,943.00 $6,673.99 0% $6,673.00 $1,73019 Conditional Use Permit – Major $9,404.00 $9,454.39 0% $9,454.00 $5020 Conditional Use Permit Modification – Minor/Major $4,815.00 $5,006.06 0% $5,006.00 $19121 C.C. & R. Review Fee + 4 hours attorney fees $2,273.00 + Atty fees $3,494.46 0% $3,494.00 $1,22122 Development Phasing Plan $1,187.00 $1,756.98 0% $1,756.00 $56923 Entertainment Permit $2,776.00 $2,823.50 0% $2,823.00 $47 24 Fence/Wall Review (Subdivision) $575.00 $5,706.74 0% $5,706.00 $5,131 6 4
DRAFT

Planning Division
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 25 Filming 1-4 Days (exclusive of all Public Safety, Public Works and Legal Expenses, charged at fully burdened hourly rate)
$578.00 NA NA $578.00 $0
26 Filming > 4 Days (exclusive of all Public Safety, Public Works and Legal Expenses, charged at fully burdened hourly rate) $717.00 NA NA $717.00 $0
27 General Plan Amendment; Zone Change (per application) $10,442.00 $10,949.91 0% $10,949.00 $50728 Initial Environmental Assessment Cost + 30% $4,206.49 0% $4,206.00 NA29 Landscape Plan Checks Review - Three Reviews & One Field Review $857.00 $1,666.92 0% $1,666.00 $809 30 Additional Landscape Plan Check Review $149.00 $533.62 0% $533.00 $384 31 Additional Landscape Plan Check Inspection $179.00 2 hour minimum $138.18 0% $138.00 -$41 32 Large Family Day Care $2,657.00 $3,017.33 0% $3,017.00 $36033 Major Environmental Assessment Cost + 30% Charge fully burdened hourly rate & out of pocket costs against deposit NA NA Cost + 30% $0
34 Mitigated Negative Declaration Cost + 30%
Charge fully burdened hourly rate & out of pocket costs against deposit NA NA Cost + 30% $0
35 Mitigation Plan One Time Monitoring Cost + 30%
Charge fully burdened hourly rate & out of pocket costs against deposit NA NA Cost + 30% $0
36 Model Home Complex Review $3,154.00 $7,155.77 0% $7,155.00 $4,00137 Planning Commission Review for Consistency 1/2 base application NA NA 1/2 base application $0 38 Planning Information Letter $485.00 NA NA $485.00 $0 39 Pre-Application Review - First Review n/a NA NA n/a $040 Pre-Application Subsequent Reviews $2,255.00 NA NA $2,255.00 $0 41 Project/Environmental Review Fee (by outside consultant selected by City) Cost + 30% NA NA Cost + 30% $0 42 Public Notice Fee $623.00 NA NA $623.00 $0
43 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.75 $0.75 0% $0.75 $0 44 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.75 $0.75 0% $0.75 $0 45 Reproduction (larger than 11" x 17") - Black/White or Color $10.00 $10.00 0% $10.00 $046 Sign Review - Monument & Pole Signs $918.00 $1,366.25 0% $1,366.00 $448 6 5
DRAFT

Planning Division
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 47 Sign Review - Wall Signs $575.00 $591.68 0% $591.00 $1648 Sign Review - Temporary Special Event Signs $90.00 $190.73 0% $190.00 $100 49 Single Event $90.00 $190.73 0% $190.00 $100
50 3 Events Per Application $90.00 $328.91 0% $328.00 $238 51 6 Month Renewal $90.00 $190.73 0% $190.00 $10052 Sign Review, Freeway - Oriented $4,678.00 $5,048.00 0% $5,047.00 $369 53 Sign Program Review $2,333.00 $2,721.00 0% $2,721.00 $388 54 Similar Use Finding - Planning Commission $9,296.00 $10,024.99 0% $10,024.00 $728 55 Site Plan Review - Minor $4,732.00 $5,366.47 0% $5,366.00 $63456 Site Plan Review - Major $8,607.00 $8,849.90 0% $8,849.00 $242 57 Site Plan Review Modification $5,397.00 $5,451.37 0% $5,451.00 $5458 Special Events - Sidewalk Sales $90.00 NA NA $90.00 $0 59 Special Events - Non Profit Organizations n/a NA NA n/a $060 Requires Closure of Public Right-Of-Way at the End of Dead-End Public Trails, Sidewalks or Streets $90.00 $264.17 0% $264.00 $17461 Requires the Closure of Public Right-Of-Way on or Through Public Trails, Sidewalks or Streets that Require a Traffic Plan/Detours $393.00 $471.81 0% $471.00 $78
62 Special Events - All Others $217.00 $888.39 0% $888.00 $67163 Block Party $630.00 $888.39 0% $888.00 $25864 Temporary construction trailer or storage container $179.00 $1,029.52 0% $1,029.00 $85065 Seasonal Sales/Opening $138.00 NA NA $138.00 $066 Event on Private Property $119.00 NA NA $119.00 $0 67 Requires Closure of Public Right-Of-Way at the End of Dead-End Public Trails, Sidewalks or Streets $1,031.00 $1,098.61 0% $1,098.00 $6768 Requires the Closure of Public Right-Of-Way on or Through Public Trails, Sidewalks or Streets that Require a Traffic Plan/Detours All related fees NA NA All related fees $0
69 Note: All Special Event applications would also include the cost of any street closure, traffic control, On-site patrol, additional fire protection standby, etc. n/a NA NA n/a $0
70 Specific Plan Preparation (up to 200 hours) $41,632.00 NA NA Cost + 30% NA 71 Specific Plan Amendment (up to 200 hours) $37,474.00 NA NA Cost + 30% NA 72 Swap Meet/Open Air Market-Temporary Permit - Per Day $47.00 $264.17 0% $264.00 $217 73 Swap Meet/Open Air Market-Permanent Permit $8,049.00 $8,206.92 0% $8,206.00 $15774 Swap Meet Processing Fee/State Fee 36.00/1.00 NA NA 36.00/1.00 $075 Tentative Parcel Map - Single Family Residential (three plan checks included) $9,435.00 $13,345.11 0% $13,345.00 $3,910 76 Tentative Parcel Map - Commercial (three plan checks included) $9,435.00 $13,660.44 0% $13,660.00 $4,225 77 Plus per lot $200.00 per lot NA NA $200.00 per lot $0 6 6
DRAFT

Planning Division
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 78 Tentative Parcel Map (additional plan checks per sheet) $461.00 NA NA $461.00 $079 Tentative Parcel Map Modification $6,142.00 $8,374.66 0% $8,374.00 $2,23280 Tentative Parcel Map Extension of Time (Planning Commission and City Council) $1,121.00 NA NA $1,121.00 $081 Tentative Tract Map (first three plan checks are included) * $20,388.00 $22,468.23 0% $22,468.00 $2,08082 Plus $260.00 lot over 5 $303.11 0% $303.00 lot over 5 $43 83 Tentative Tract Map (additional plan check fees per sheet) $768.00 $1,207.03 0% $1,207.00 $439 84 Tentative Tract Map Modification $6,699.00 $12,578.99 0% $12,578.00 $5,87985 Variance - Commercial and Modifications to Variance Commercial $3,676.00 $3,934.15 0% $3,934.00 $25886 Variance - Residential and Modification to Variance Residential $3,094.00 $3,934.15 0% $3,934.00 $84087 Zone Change **See General Plan Amendment
NA NA
**See General Plan Amendment $0
88 Zone Code Amendment/Code Change Application $4,321.00 NA NA $4,321.00 $089 Zone Verification Letter $179.00 NA NA $179.00 $090 Recordation Fee New NA NA Actual Cost NA 91 CEQA DOCUMENT FILING FEES New NA NA Actual Cost NA92 Negative Declaration (ND) New NA NA Actual Cost NA93 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) New NA NA Actual Cost NA94 County Clerk Processing Fee for ND&MND New NA NA Actual Cost NA 95 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) New NA NA Actual Cost NA 96 County Clerk Processing Fee for EIR New NA NA Actual Cost NA97 County Clerk Processing Fee New NA NA Actual Cost NA 6 7
DRAFT

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Blasting Permit - Initial Fee $824.00 $1,357.42 0% $1,357.00 $533 2 Blasting Permit - Each Additional Blast $360.00 $713.67 0% $713.00 $3533 Encroachment - Single Domestic Water Service (line only) 1" & 2" $1,056.00 $1,794.70 0% $1,794.00 $7384 Encroachment - Commercial/SFR Utility Lateral (sewer & water 3" & above) $1,056.00 $1,794.70 0% $1,794.00 $7385 Encroachment - SFR Driveway Approach $670.00 $1,035.54 0% $1,035.00 $3656 Encroachment - SFR Driveway Pavers (non-trail side) $764.00 $1,225.33 0% $1,225.00 $461 7 Encroachment - SFR Curb Core $571.00 $845.75 0% $845.00 $2748 Encroachment - Commercial Driveway $764.00 $1,225.33 0% $1,225.00 $4619 Encroachment - Commercial Trail Pavers $764.00 $1,225.33 0% $1,225.00 $46110 Encroachment - Sign in Right of Way $478.00 $523.88 0% $523.00 $4511 Encroachment - Utility Street Cut 4.5% of cost estimate, minimum of $670 $1,035.54 0% 4.5% of cost estimate, minimum of $1,035 $365 12 Final Map Check - Includes first three plan checks $5,326.00 plus per lot fee NA NA $5,326.00 $0 13 Final Map Check $600.00 lot $699.37 0% $699.00 $9914 Final Map Check (after 3 checks) Fully Burdened Charge Fully Burdened Staff Rate against an initial deposit NA NA Fully Burdened $0
15 Grading and Posting Plan Review – Residential $831.00 NA NA $831.00 $016 Grading and Posting Plan Review – Commercia l - Charge UBC $2,868.00 NA NA $2,868.00 $017 first 3 plan checks $2,890.00 NA NA $2,890.00 $0 18 additional plan checks $310.00
or fully burdened hourly rate with a $2,890 minimum
NA NA $310.00 $0
19 Grading Permit/Inspection – Residential $1,459.00 $2,743.65 0% $2,743.00 $1,284 20 Grading Permit/Inspection – Other – Charge UBC $2,012.00 $3,217.79 0% $3,217.00 $1,20521 Inspection Fee 14.04.150(B) $150.00 per hr NA NA $150.00 $0 22 Lot Line Adjustment (includes 3 plan checks, additional checks at fully burdened staff rate) $1,907.00 NA NA $1,907.00 $0 23 Lot Merger (Includes 3 plan checks, additional checks at fully burdened staff rate) $1,776.00 NA NA $1,776.00 $0 24 New Meter Purchase Cost + 20% NA NA Cost + 20% $025 Overload Permit-one day $21.00 $72.15 0% $72.00 $51 26 Overload Moving Permit – Annual Permit $112.00 NA NA $112.00 $0 27 PAKA Relocation $1,837.00 NA NA $1,837.00 $028 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.25 $0.25 0% $0.25 $0 29 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.50 $0.50 0% $0.50 $030 Reproduction (Larger than 11” x 17” sheet) Black/White or Color $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $0 31 Technical Report Review – Charge full cost against a deposit with a minimum fee of: $1,242.00 $1,317.81 0% $1,317.00 $7532 Hydrology Review (includes 3 reviews) $5,692.00 $4,621.56 0% $4,621.00 -$1,07133 WQMP Review (includes 3 reviews) $5,692.00 $4,621.56 0% $4,621.00 -$1,07134 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK 6 8
DRAFT

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 35 $0 - $10,000 $977.00 NA NA $977.00 $0
36 $10,001 - $100,000 $977.00
+ % OF VALUATION > $10,000
NA NA $977.00 $0
37 $10,001 - $100,000 3.2% OF VALUATION NA NA $0.03 0.0% 38 $100,001 - $1,000,000 $4,473.00
+ % OF VALUATION > $100,000
NA NA $4,473.00 $0
39 $100,001 - $1,000,000 1.3% OF VALUATION NA NA $0.01 0.0% 40 >$1,000,000 $18,672.00
+ % OF VALUATION > $1,000,000
NA NA $18,672.00 $0
41 >$1,000,000 0.9% OF VALUATION NA NA $0.01 0.0%
42 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION43 $0 - $10,000 $710.00 $1,283.04 0% $1,283.00 $57344 $10,001 - $100,000 $710.00 + % OF
VALUATION > $10,000
$1,283.04 0% $1,283.00 $573
45 $10,001 - $100,000 3.6% OF VALUATION 14.5% 0% 14.5% 10.9%46 $100,001 - $1,000,000 $4,643.00 + % OF
VALUATION > $100,000
$9,254.19 0% $9,254.00 $4,611
47 $100,001 - $1,000,000 1.15% OF VALUATION 5.0% 0% 5.0% 3.9% 48 >$1,000,000 $17,204.00
+ % OF
VALUATION > $1,000,000
$34,306.39 0% $34,306.00 $17,102
49 >$1,000,000 0.55% OF VALUATION 1.7% 0% 1.7% 1.1%
50 Re-Inspection Fee $77.00 NA NA $77.00 $0
51 Renewal Fee for Expired Permit New per permit $204.24 0% $204.00 NA 52 Plan Check Fee 14.04.150(B) $150.00 per hr NA NA $150.00 $0 53 Temporary Service – Monthly Service Charge

14.04.130
Current 3" Water Service Charge NA NA Current 3" Water Service Charge $0 54 Technology Surcharge New
Applied to all permit
fees, with the exception of
reproduction
25% 80% 5% NA
55 Utility Pole Installation or Replacement $213.00 plus per site fee NA NA $213.00 $056 Utility Pole Installation or Replacement $155.00 per site $379.58 0% $379.00 $224 57 Wireless Communications - Small Cell Facility Permit (in public right-of-way) $150.00 plus per site fee NA NA $150.00 $0 58 Wireless Communications - Small Cell Facility Permit (in public right-of-way) $365.00 per site $435.20 0% $435.00 $70 59 Wireless Communications - Modification of Existing Telecommunication Facility $74.00 plus per site fee NA NA $74.00 $060 Wireless Communications - Modification of Existing Telecommunication Facility $185.00 per site $217.60 0% $217.00 $32 69 DRAFT

WATER UTILITY FEES
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Broken/Damaged Lock Fee $33.00 $89.04 49% $45.00 $122 Check Read Charge $91.00 $178.09 48% $92.00 $1 3 Construction Meter Relocation $207.00 $397.37 45% $220.00 $13 4 Deposit – Clean and Show $207.00 NA NA $200.00 -$75 Deposit – Commercial, Industrial, Multi-Family $300.00 min NA NA $300.00 $06 Deposit – Meter Test (2” or smaller) At staff/3rd party vendor cost NA NA At staff/3rd party vendor cost $0 7 Deposit – Meter Test (3” or larger) At staff/3rd party vendor cost NA NA At staff/3rd party vendor cost $08 Deposit – Residential, Landscape, Fireline $200.00 min NA NA $200.00 $09 Deposit – Temporary Construction Meter $1,886.00 NA NA $1,886.00 $0
10 Fire Flow Test Fee Change Fee
Structure At 3rd party cost + 20% NA NA At 3rd party cost + 20% $0 11 Jumper Fee $175.00 $320.58 45% $175.00 $0
12 Late Charge 10% of Outstanding Amount NA NA 10% of Outstanding Amount $0 13 New Service Fee $51.00 NA NA $50.00 -$114 Pulled Meter Fee $175.00 $320.58 45% $175.00 $0 15 Service Turn-Off/Disconnection Fee $114.00 $249.27 54% $114.00 $0 16 Service Turn-On/Reconnection Fee - SB998 (after 3:30 pm) $178.00 $605.57 70% $180.00 $2 17 Service Turn-On/Reconnection Fee - SB998 (prior to 3:30 pm) $60.00 $178.09 65% $62.00 $218 Service Turn-On/Reconnection Fee (after 3:30 pm) $267.00 $605.57 56% $267.00 $019 Service Turn-On/Reconnection Fee (prior to 3:30 pm) $72.00 $178.09 58% $74.00 $220 Temporary Service – Monthly Service Charge Current 3" Water Service Charge NA NA Current 3" Water Service Charge $021 Voluntary Emergency Medical Services Subscription Program (Residential Monthly Subscriber) $4.00 $35.59 89% $4.00 $0
22 Set up fee - Temporary
Construction Meter 211.00 NA NA $211.00 $0
7 0
DRAFT

Sheriff's Department
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Citation Correction Certification $15.00 $112.74 56% $50.00 $35 2 Handicap Placer Signoff New $14.08 1% $14.00 NA
3 Background Investigation & Report (per application + outside fees) $281.00 $257.39 3% $250.00 -$31 4 DUI Emergency Response Recovery charge up to statutory limit at the County and City approved rate for staff and equipment Cost of Service NA NA Cost of Service $0
5 One Day ABC License (may be waived for non-profits) $55.00 $76.17 28% $55.00 $0 6 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Black/White $0.25 NA NA $0.25 $07 Reproduction (up to 11" x 17") - Color $0.50 NA NA $0.50 $08 Reproduction (larger than 11" x 17") - Black/White or Color $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $09 Public Records Request $0.10 page Section 6253.9 NA NA $0.10 $0 10 Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery $217.00 $229.48 2% $225.00 $811 Vehicle (VIN) Verification Service $108.00 $114.74 4% $110.00 $212 Fines Related to Parking Violations 13 Municipal Code Section Violation 14 10.08 et al All violations not enumerated $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 15 10.08.030A Parking in equestrian trail $155.00 NA NA $155.00 $0 16 10.08.030B Obstruct traffic or hazard $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 17 10.08.030C Obstruct private driveway $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $018 10.08.030D Obstruct fire equipment to hydrant $139.00 NA NA $139.00 $0 19 10.08.030E Posted no parking or permit only $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $020 10.16.060 Commercial vehicle prohibition $259.00 NA NA $259.00 $0 21 10.16.070 Unattached trailer prohibition $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $022 Any other M.C. section Any parking violation not otherwise listed $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $023 9.65.21 First or Second False Alarm Response Fee $175.00 NA NA $175.00 $0
24 9.65.21 Third Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $0 7 1
DRAFT

Sheriff's Department
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 25 9.65.21 Fourth Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period $300.00 NA NA $300.00 $026 9.65.21 Fifth Response to False Alarm within 365 Consecutive Day Period $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $027 Vehicle Code Section Violation28 4000(a)(1) Unregistered Vehicle $81.00 NA NA $81.00 $029 21113(a) Permit required - Public Grounds $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $030 22500(a) Improper parking - Intersection $57.00 NA NA $57.00 $031 22500(b) Improper parking - Crosswalk $57.00 NA NA $57.00 $032 22500(c) Improper parking - Safety Zone $62.00 NA NA $62.00 $0 33 22500(d) Improper parking - Fire Station $57.00 NA NA $57.00 $0 34 22500(e) Improper parking - Driveway $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 35 22500(f) Improper parking - Sidewalk $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 36 22500(g) Improper parking - Obstruct Traffic $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 37 22500(h) Improper parking - Double Park $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $038 22500(i) Improper parking - Bus zones $295.00 NA NA $295.00 $0 39 22500(j) Improper parking - Tunnel $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $0 40 22500(k) Improper parking - Bridge $41.00 NA NA $41.00 $0 41 22500(l) Parking in wheelchair access $419.00 NA NA $419.00 $0 42 22500.10 Parking in fire lane $368.00 NA NA $368.00 $0 43 22507.8(a)(b)(c) Designated parking - Disabled $419.00 NA NA $419.00 $0 44 22514 Parking - Fire Hydrant $135.00 NA NA $135.00 $045 Any other V.C. Section Any parking violation not otherwise listed $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $046 22502(a) Improper parking - 18” from curb $36.00 NA NA $36.00 $047 5200(a) Improper/Fail to display license plate $81.00 NA NA $81.00 $048 5204(a) Registration tabs properly affixed $81.00 NA NA $81.00 $0 7 2
DRAFT

27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
DRAFT

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Sophia Mathiesen, Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only RECOMMENDATION:

Waive reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Sophia Mathiesen, Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2025.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):

City Council - Jul 16 2025 - DRAFT Minutes

DRAFT - MINUTES
City Council
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL Greg Newton, Mayor
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor Pro Tem
Kevin Bash, Council Member
Gregory Bowen, Council Member
Fia Sullivan, Council Member

ROBIN GRUNDMEYER, MAYOR PRO TEM - ATTENDING OFFSITE
The Westin Bonaventure
404 S. Figueroa St.

Los Angeles, CA

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Newton adjourned to Closed Session at 6:03 PM.

City Attorney Burns read the Closed Session items into the record.

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: Silverlakes Sports Park - APNs 152060004; 152060011; 152070001; 152070002; and 152070011
Agency negotiator: City Manager
Negotiating parties: City of Norco and Balboa Management Group LLC.

Under negotiation: Price and Terms

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code §54954.5
Agency designated representatives: Acting City Manager and City Attorney Employee organization: Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO Local 606 RECONVENE PUBLIC SESSION 7:00 PM

REPORT OF ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Burns stated that there were no reportable actions taken during Closed Session.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Newton

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025
INVOCATION Pastor Spencer Parish
Beacon Hill Assembly of God
PRESENTATIONS Riverside County Sheriff's Office -
Recognition of Sergeant Bryce Cooper

1. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL BOARDS
The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members provided reports on their recent individual participation in committees, commissions, regional boards, and community organizations.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jeff Solsby from The Previti Group introduced himself and provided information on services offered.

Jerry Lunde spoke regarding his concerns for safety issues related to the increase in eBikes around the City.

Bonnie Slager spoke regarding the Norco Fair and that fair buttons are on sale at several local stores and at City Hall.

Richard Gregory spoke regarding his eBike store and regarding his concerns for the traffic on Sixth Street.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a) Approval of Consent Calendar as Presented.

M/S BASH/SULLIVAN Approve of Consent Calendar as presented. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

3.A. Waive Reading of all Ordinance Adoptions on this Agenda and Read by Title Only

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025
Action: Waived reading, by title only, of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

3.B. Approval of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Action: Approved the City Council Regular Meeting Minutes of July 02, 2025.

3.C. Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on July 09, 2025
Action: Received and filed the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on July 09, 2025.

3.D. Fiscal Year 2024-25 California State Fire Marshal Annual Inspection Compliance Report
Action: Received and Filed the Fiscal Year 2024-25 California State Fire Marshal Annual Inspection Compliance Report

3.E. Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing Between $25,000 to $49,999 Action: Received and filed the Quarterly Purchase Orders Listing for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025.

3.F. Acceptance of the Pikes Peak Park ADA Synthetic Poured-In-Place Surfacing Project as Complete (Project No. 4407.8)
Action: Accepted the Pikes Peak Park ADA Synthetic Poured-In-Place Surfacing Project as complete and authorized the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

3.G. Acceptance of Proposals and Award of Contract for Traffic Signal and Street Light Maintenance Services
Action: Accepted the proposals submitted for performance services to provide Annual Traffic Signal and Street Light Maintenance Services and awarded a three-year contract to Yunex, LLC in the amount not-to-exceed $135,000 annually.

3.H. Three-Year Agreement for Emergency Services Coordinator Services with County of Riverside

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025
Action: Approved a three-year Agreement for Emergency Services Coordinator Services with the County of Riverside.

3.I. Acceptance of the Moreno Arena Bleacher Replacement Project as Complete Action: Accepted the Moreno Arena Bleacher Replacement Project as complete and authorized the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside.

4. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
No items were pulled from the Consent Calendar.

5. PUBLIC HEARING(S)

5.A. Public Hearing: Confirming the Report of Costs for Spring and Fall Weed Abatement, Fiscal Year 2024-25
Deputy Fire Marshal, Michelle Starky, presented the report on the 2024-2025 Costs for Spring and Fall Weed Abatement.

Council Members had no questions or concerns.

Mayor Newton opened the Public Hearing.

There were no public comments at this time.

Mayor Newton closed the Public Hearing.

No further discussion, motion was made.

M/S BASH/SULLIVAN Adopt Resolution No. 2025-50, confirming the Report of Costs for abatement of weeds and hazardous vegetation as a public nuisance and imposing special assessment liens on vacant parcels within the City. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025

5.B. Bluff Street Annexation #27, General Plan Amendment 2023-01, Zone Change 2023-01 (Pre-Zone) (City of Norco): A City-Initiated Proposal to Annex Approximately 56.82 Acres of Unincorporated Territory North of Bluff Street and West of River Road to the City of Norco. This Project Includes a General Plan Amendment to Establish Land Use Designations of RA (Residential Agricultural) and WR (Water Related) for the Properties to be Annexed, and a Zone Change to Pre-Zone the Properties with Corresponding Zones: A-1-20 (Agricultural Low Density) and OS (Open Space). The Subject Project Consists of the Following APNs: 121-030-004, -008, -009, -010, -011, -012, -013, -014, - 016, 121-050- 001, -003, -005, -031, -032, -034 and -035, 121-320-002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -007, -008, and -009
Community Development Director Robles presented the report on Bluff Street Annexation #27.

City Attorney Burns, Public Works Director Nelson and Community Development Director Robles answered questions and addressed concerns.

Mayor Newton opened the Public Hearing
The following community members spoke in opposition of the Bluff Street Annexation #27: Roger Vanderlaan, Lynette Pasley, Ray Curne, Mark Brodersen, Joe Brown, Master Tam Luung, George Phillips, Miguel Nunez, and Mary Roberts,
Mayor Newton closed the Public Hearing.

Council Member Bash addressed concerns from the community members.

Council Member Bowen discussed the concerns regarding sewer connections.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer thanked the community for their letters and their engagement during the Public Hearing. She discussed the concerns regarding property taxes, zoning and land use, and sewer connections.

Mayor Newton allowed Miguel Nunez to state his concern regarding the sewer connection and being over 300 feet from the nearest connection.

Mayor Newton discussed the concerns regarding the sewer connections, waiving the non-connect fees, public safety regarding fire and law enforcement, and the General Plan Amendment.

Council Member Bash discussed the sewer connections, the LAFCO process, and public safety.

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025
Council Member Sullivan thanked the community for attending and speaking their concerns.

Mayor Pro Tem Grundmeyer asked for clarification on the findings for the community and discussed the overall process.

Following discussion, motion was made.

M/S GRUNDMEYER/BASH Adopt Resolution No. 2025-51, approving Annexation 27 and authorizing that an application be initiated with LAFCO; Adopt Resolution No. 2025-52, approving General Plan Amendment 2023-01, and approve first reading of Ordinance No. 1132 approving Zone Change (pre-zone) 2023-01. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, AND BASH
NOES: BOWEN AND SULLIVAN
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

6. CITY COUNCIL / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Community Services Manager Gonzalez Marshall invited everyone to attend the last Concert in the Park event on Friday July 18, 2025.

Public Works Director Nelson provided information on the Hamner Avenue and Third Street construction.

Mayor Newton requested to agendize a discussion regarding the current Municipal Code Ordinance for fireworks.

M/S NEWTON/BASH Agendize a discussion regarding the current firework Ordinance. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: GRUNDMEYER
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Mayor Newton requested to agendize a discussion regarding trail dedications.

M/S NEWTON/BASH Agendize a discussion regarding trail dedications. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

City Council Minutes - July 16, 2025
AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Council Member Bash had concerns regarding the Hamner Avenue Project and the contractors assigned to traffic control and flagging.

Public Works Director Nelson stated he would address the contractors.

Council Member Bash requested to agendize a discussion regarding a property located on Fourth Street and Clark Avenue and the possibility for senior housing.

M/S BASH/SULLIVAN Agendize a discussion regarding senior housing for a property located on Fourth Street and Clark Avenue. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:

AYES: NEWTON, GRUNDMEYER, BASH, BOWEN, AND SULLIVAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Newton adjourned the meeting at 9:13 PM.
_________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC
City Clerk

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.C.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Prepared By: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025.

SUMMARY:

This report has been prepared to meet the requirements of the City’s Investment Policy and applicable sections of the State of California Government Code.

BACKGROUND:

Attachment A provides a summary schedule of the City’s operating portfolio holdings by type as of June 30, 2025. This summary also provides information on investment compliance with the limitations imposed by State law and the City’s Investment Policy.

Investments that are subject to the Statement of Investment Policy are operating or idle funds invested by the Treasurer within the provisions of the approved Investment Policy.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the operating portfolio increased by a net amount of $9.7 million from $94.9 million to $104.5 million.

The excess of cash receipts over cash disbursements was anticipated during the quarter as revenue receipts during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year usually exceeds disbursements for expenditures. This is due to receipt of vehicle license fees, utility franchise fees, second installment of property taxes for the City and special districts, and receipt for Successor Agency debt service payments. The Successor Agency property tax received will be used for Successor Agency debt service payments in August. In comparing the current quarter to last year’s quarter, the current year operating portfolio increased mainly by the Successor Agency, Water Fund, Storm Drain Fund and Special Districts.

A summary of investments not subject to the provisions of the Investment Policy (bond proceeds and debt service reserve funds) is also shown on Attachment A. These funds are invested in accordance with applicable bond indenture provisions. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, bond proceeds and debt service reserve fund portfolio decreased by a net amount of $0.7 million from $7.7 million to $7.0 million due to debt service payments on Enterprise Revenue Bonds.

Attachment B provides a graphical breakdown of the operating portfolio holdings by investment type as of June 30, 2025. This chart is for investments that are subject to the Investment Policy. The operating portfolio consisted of 25.58% investment in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), 36.72% California Asset Management Plan (CAMP), 24.07% in Agency Securities and the remaining 13.63% in cash.

Attachment C provides a detailed listing of the City’s portfolio holdings as required by the Government Code. In this listing, “N/A” is used to denote that the information is either not available or applicable. Agency Securities issued by United States Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs) are rated “AA+” by Moody’s rating service and “AAA” by Fitch rating service. Attachment D indicates cash balances by Fund as additional information to complement the schedule of investment holdings. For the Operating Funds, the cash balance provides an indication of the financial health of each Fund.

Attachment D indicates cash balances by Fund as additional information to complement the schedule of investment holdings. For the Operating Funds, the cash balance provides an indication of the financial health of each Fund.

Attachment E: Based on cash balances as of June 30, 2025, and anticipated cash receipts for the next six months, the Treasurer certifies that there will be sufficient cash to cover disbursements for the City and Successor Agency for the next six months ending December 31, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This agenda item will not result in a fiscal impact.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Portfolio Summary (Attachment A)
Summary Charts (Attachment B)
Portfolio Detail (Attachment C)
Detail by Fund (Attachment D)
Certification (Attachment E)

Attachment A
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Summary
As of June 30, 2025
City Investments Subject to Investment Policy Market Value Percentage Policy Maximum ComplianceCash $ 14,255,247 13.63% NA In Compliance Local Agency Investment Fund 26,743,937 25.58% 100% In Compliance CAMP 38,394,016 36.72% 100% In Compliance
U.S. Government Agency Securities 25,164,731 24.07% 100% In Compliance Total $ 104,557,931 100.00%

8.294%
City Investments Not Subject to Investment Policy Market Value PercentageCommunity Facilities Districts $ 1,842,877 26.15% Sewer and Water System 20,808 0.30%Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,182,670 73.55% Total $ 7,046,355 100.00%

0.704%
Estimated Portfolio YieldEstimated Portfolio Yield

BEGINNING AND ENDING VALUES BREAKDOWN OF INVESTMENTS
Beg. Market Values Ending Market Values
Breakdown 3/31/2025 6/30/2025 Investments Subject to Investment Policy Portfolio % Rating Cash 6,666,555 14,255,247 Local Agency Investment Fund 26,743,937 25.58% Not Rated Local Agency Investment Fund 25,418,628 26,743,937 Federal Home Loan Banks 25,164,731 24.07% AAA California Asset Management Plan 37,272,915 38,394,016 CA Asset Management Plan 38,394,016 36.72% AAAm U.S. Government Agency Securities 25,524,742 25,164,731 Wells Fargo Checking Account 13,421,239 12.84% Not Rated Total Market Value 94,882,840 104,557,931 US Bank Principal Cash 834,008 0.80% Not Rated TOTAL 104,557,931 100%
Attachment B

SUMMARY OF CITY OF NORCO'S PORTFOLIO

INVESTMENTS SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT POLICY
Not Rated
39%
Rated
61%
By Rating
< 1 year
78%
1-3 years
6%
> 3 years
16%
By Maturity (Years)
Local Agency
Investment
Fund
25%
Federal Home
Loan Banks
24%
CA Asset
Management
Plan
37%
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
14%
By Type

Attachment C Page 1
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2025
Investments Subject to Policy
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security Account Type Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Checking Accounts Checking Accounts N/A Wells Fargo N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 13,421,239 13,421,239 N/A N/A N/A Principal Cash Custodial Account N/A US Bank N/A N/A 0.00% N/A 834,008 834,008 Subtotal 14,255,247 14,255,247
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF Account XI.15 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 26,721,245 26,743,937 Subtotal 26,721,245 26,743,937
California Asset Management Plan
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A California Asset Management Plan LAIF Account XI.13 CA Joint Powers Authority N/A N/A N/A N/A 35,500,000 38,394,016 Subtotal 35,500,000 38,394,016
US Bank Custodial Account
10/22/24 10/22/29 3130B3BB8 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AAA 5.000% 5.003% 2,325,000 2,325,000 2,325,302 09/30/24 09/26/29 3130B2Y41 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.100% 4.122% 5,365,000 5,364,142 5,335,010 01/26/24 01/26/28 3130AYPJ9 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.500% 4.506% 6,000,000 6,000,000 5,993,400 04/09/24 04/09/26 3133ETCF2 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.520% 4.514% 3,133,000 3,133,000 3,138,827 08/20/24 08/10/29 3130B2FW0 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.250% 4.273% 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,378,342 01/28/25 01/28/30 3130B4HU8 Federal Home Loan Banks Custodial Account XI.5 US Bank AA+ 4.750% 4.757% 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,993,850 25,222,142 25,164,731
Total Investments Subject to Policy 101,698,634 104,557,931

Attachment C Page 2
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2025
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Community Facilities Districts
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market CFD 2001-1 (2017) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 65,891 65,891 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market CFD 2001-1 (2017) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 179 179 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market CFD 2001-1 (2017) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 42,126 42,126 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market CFD 2001-1 (2017) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 112 112 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government CFD 97-1 (2018) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 615 615 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government CFD 97-1 (2018) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 22,401 22,401 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government CFD 97-1 (2018) XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 218,717 218,717 Subtotal 350,042 350,042
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (CFD 2002-1) CFD 2002-1 XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 61,221 61,273 Subtotal 61,221 61,273
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
08/21/19 08/24/25 3136G4Q97 F H L M C M T N CFD 2001-1 (2017) XI.5 US Bank AAA 65.000% 0.654% 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,431,562 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,431,562
Total Community Facilities Districts 1,851,264 1,842,877 Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Sewer and Water System
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government Water and Sewer Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 296 296 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government Water and Sewer Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 18,658 18,658 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government Water and Sewer Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 1,847 1,847 N/A N/A 31846V203 First American Government Water and Sewer Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.956% N/A 7 7 Subtotal 20,808 20,808
Total Sewer and Water System 20,808 20,808

Attachment C Page 3
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details
As of June 30, 2025
Investments Not Subject to Policy (Bond Proceeds)
Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation 2003 RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.806% N/A 131,749 131,749 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation 2009 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.806% N/A 399 399 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation 2009 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.806% N/A 60,510 60,510 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation 2009 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.806% N/A 1,337 1,337 N/A N/A 31846V401 First American Government Obligation 2009 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 3.806% N/A 7,046 7,046 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 95 95 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 37,018 37,018 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 28 28 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 School Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 3,949 3,949 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 56,351 56,351 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 12 12 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 15 15 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2014 RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 42,707 42,707 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2017 A & B RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 107,428 107,428 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2017 A & B RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 79 79 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2017 A & B RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 73 73 N/A N/A 9AMMF05B2 US Bank Money Market 2017 A & B RDA Bond XI.11 US Bank N/A N/A 0.005% N/A 1,973,145 1,973,145 Subtotal 2,421,941 2,421,941
Local Agency Investment Fund
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2010 TABs) 2010 RDA Bond XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 25,625 25,646 N/A N/A N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (2003 TABs) 2003 RDA Bond XI.13 State of California N/A N/A N/A N/A 116,864 116,963 Subtotal 142,489 142,610
U.S. and Agency Securities
Purchase
Date Maturity Date CUSIP # Description of Security
Investment
Policy Account Rating
Coupon
Rate
Yield to
Maturity Face Value Cost Market Value
05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks 2009 School Bond XI.5 US Bank AAA 50.000% 0.512% N/A 1,040,000 1,015,986 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks 2014 RDA Bond XI.5 US Bank AAA 50.000% 0.512% N/A 1,055,000 1,030,640 05/26/21 05/26/26 3130AMG63 Federal Home Loan Banks 2014 School Bond XI.5 US Bank AAA 50.000% 0.512% N/A 585,000 571,492 Subtotal 2,680,000 2,618,119
Total Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds 5,244,430 5,182,670 Total Investments Not Subject to Policy 7,116,502 7,046,355

Attachment D
City of Norco, California
Portfolio Details by Fund
As of June 30, 2025
Investments Subject to Policy Qtr ended
06/30/25
Fund Description Balance
016 Cal Home Grant Fund 197,744
017 Successor Agency Fund 3,277,624
018 Housing Fund 4,889,998
121 General Fund 30,384,859
122 Miscellaneous Grants Fund 496,983
123 CDBG Fund (267,020)
124 Water Fund 5,513,200
126 Sewer Fund 1,754,856
127/132 Measure R Fund 12,836,270
128 Equipment Replacement Fund 4,599,231
129 Storm Drain Fund 872,988
131 Nancy Newman Fund 39,573
133 Gas Tax Fund 26,340
134 Benefits and Insurance Fund 871,520
135 Information Technology Fund 1,656,052
136 SB1 Road Maintenance & Rehab. Fund 909,867
137 Measure A Fund 2,314,649
139 NPDES Fund (46,620)
140 General Govt Improvement Fund 517,073
141 Park Improvement Fund 4,141,421
142 Fire Improvement Fund 1,034,981
143 Trail Improvement Fund 246,015
144 Water Capital Fund 4,077,377
146 Public Meeting Facilities Fund 1,136,106
147 Sewer Facilities Fund 12,582,168
149 Street Improvement Fund 1,321,163
151 Animal Control Fund 85,149
152 Facility Improvement Fund 134,188
154 Trust Deposit Fund 1,024,862
156 AQMD Fund 24,590
158 Waste Management Fund (117,023)
159 Recyled Water Capital Fund (220,339)
166 Recyled Water Fund 2,584,202
181 CFD 97-1 597,611
182 CFD 2001-1 2,816,550
183 CFD 2002-1 177,693
179 LMD #1 (4,809)
176 LMD #2 32,742
177 LMD #3 28,576
186 LMD #4 439,310
187 LMD #5 113,533
Subtotal - General Ledger 103,101,251
Various Outstanding Checks/Deposits in Transit 1,456,680 Total Cash and Investments 104,557,931

Attachment E
Quarterly Investment Portfolio
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2025
As required by the Government Code, the Treasurer certifies that the investments reported in the accompanying schedules (Attachments A through D) comply with the City of Norco Investment Policy and that sufficient liquidity along with anticipated revenues are available to meet the City and Successor Agency budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months ending December 31, 2025.

August 6, 2025
Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Date

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.D.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Amendment of Fiscal Year 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to include additional funding for the On-Call Street Maintenance Services; and accept the proposal and Award of Performance Services Contract for On-Call Street Maintenance Services RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-55 to increase Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-30 CIP street funding in the amount of $100,000 for the On-Call Street Maintenance Service contract; accept the proposals submitted for performance services to provide Annual On-Call Street Maintenance Services, award a three-year contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc., and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract in the amount not-to-exceed $300,000 annually.

SUMMARY:

A request for proposal was opened July 10, 2025, with five bidders submitting proposals for the Annual On-Call Street Maintenance Services. Each of the proposals were evaluated and rated to determine the best qualified proposal to meet the City's needs with Hardy & Harper, Inc. being rated as the most qualified proposer.

BACKGROUND:

Staff completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for bidding purposes and on July 10, 2025, five (5) proposals were received from CJ Concrete Construction, Inc., G.M. Sager Construction, Inc., Gentry General Engineering, Inc., Hardy & Harper, Inc. and We R Builders, Inc. the RFP calls for furnishing, on an "as-needed" basis, all labor, materials, tools, equipment, appurtenances and incidentals for saw cutting, grinding, removal & replacement of various concrete including: sidewalks, curbs, gutters, cross gutters, driveways, handicapped ramps, etc. Work shall also include removal and replacement of asphalt concrete, aggregate base, minor asphalt repairs, reconstruction, overlaying, slurry and sealing of asphalt concrete streets and raising manhole and valve cans to grade.

Each of the proposals was evaluated and rated to determine the best qualified proposal to meet the City's needs (see attached Bid Summary). Based on staff's review Hardy & Harper, Inc. was rated as the most qualified proposer and their on-call pricing was very competitive (see attached Proposal). Hardy & Harper, Inc. is located in Santa Ana, California and has been providing the City street maintenance services for 41 years.

Hardy & Harper, Inc. has previously been awarded the annual on-call street maintenance contract in the City of Norco and staff has been very satisfied with the services provided.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed service maintenance agreement is funded from portions of the Street Fund 149 ($100,000) and the Water Fund (124.804.34100 - $200,000) for total not-toexceed amount of $300,000 annually. Funding for the proposed maintenance services is included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget within the Water Fund but was inadvertently excluded in the Street Fund. Resolution 2025-55 was prepared to appropriate additional funding for the On-Call Street Maintenance Service Contract in the amount of $100,000.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent and supports Strategic Direction No. 5 - Infrastructure & Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Bid Summary
Proposal
Hardy & Harper Contract 2025-26 to 2027-28
Resolution 2025-55

CJ Concrete Construction GM Sager Construction Hardy & Harper Gentry General Engineering We R Builders

ITEM UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE R&R 4
" $ 22.00 16.00 $ 13.40 $ 20.00 $ 37.00 $
2" AC OVERLAY $ 7.00 10.00 $ 5.00 $ 8.00 $ 15.00 $ MANHOL E $ 1,800.00 1,000.00 $ 650.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 2,200.00 $
.10' G/OL $ 12.00 5.00 $ 6.00 $ 7.00 $ 10.00 $ CURB/GUTTER $ 220.00 70.00 $ 90.00 $ 200.00 $ 165.00 $ R&R 4" SIDEWAL K $ 45.00 18.00 $ 30.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $
CURB/GUTTER $ 70.00 50.00 $ 38.00 $ 200.00 $ 65.00 $ NEW 4" SIDEWAL K $ 40.00 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 50.00 $ 35.00 $
NEW CURB/GUTTER $ 175.00 60.00 $ 90.00 $ 200.00 $ 115.00 $ 6" AC CURB $ 140.00 60.00 $ 58.00 $ 200.00 $ 70.00 $ 1" LEVELING COURS E $ 5.00 15.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 9.00 $
2" G/OL $ 15.00 15.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 15.00 $

Agreement-1

CITY OF NORCO

ANNUAL ON-CALL STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
(FISCAL YEARS 2025-26 to 2027-28)

AGREEMENT

1. Parties and Date.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of August, 2025 by and between the City of Norco, a municipal corporation of the State of California, located at 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860, County of Riverside, State of California, (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and Hardy & Harper, Inc., a corporation with its principal place of business at 32 Rancho Circle, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

2. Recitals.

2.1 Contractor.

Contractor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain maintenance services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Contractor represents that it is experienced in providing street and alley maintenance services to public clients, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the Services in the State of California, and that is familiar with the plans of the City.

2.2 Project.

Contractor desires to engage Contractor to render such services for the Annual Street Maintenance Project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Contractor promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the street and alley maintenance services on an asneeded basis necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The terms of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years from August 6, 2025 to June 30, 2028. Contractor shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2 Responsibilities of Contractor.

3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Project shall be constructed by Contractor or under its supervision. Contractor will determine the means, methods and details of constructing the Project subject to the requirements of this

Agreement-2
Agreement. City retains Contractor on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

Any additional personnel constructing the Project under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with the construction of the Project under this Agreement and as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Contractor shall construct the Project expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Project timeframe set forth herein. Contractor represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to construct the Project in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Contractor’s conformance with the Project timeframe, City shall respond to Contractor’s Requests for Information in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Contractor shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Project timeframe.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the Director of Public Works, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.5 Contractor’s Representative. Contractor hereby designates Michael Murray – Vice President, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Contractor’s Representative”). Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. The Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Project, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Project under this Agreement.

3.2.6 Coordination of Project. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the construction of the Project and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.7 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Contractor shall construct the Project under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to construct the Project. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to construct the Project. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to construct the Project, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Contractor or its sub-contractors who is determined by the City to be uncooperative,

Agreement-3
incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to construct the Project in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Contractor and shall not be re-employed to perform any work on the Project.

3.2.7.1 Period of Performance and Liquidated Damages. Contractor shall perform and complete the Project under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section

3.1.2 above (“Term”). Contractor shall construct the Project in strict accordance with any timeframe provided herein, or which may be provided separately in writing to the Contractor.

Contractor agrees that if the Project is not completed within the aforementioned Term and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule or Project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum of $500.00 per working day:

3.2.8 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Project. If the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.9 Insurance.

3.2.9.1 Time for Compliance. Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.9.2 Minimum Requirements. Throughout the life of this Contract, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A- VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) as may be authorized in writing by City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Contract) with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury $2,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations

Agreement-4
$4,000,000 general aggregate
(ii) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, and include coverage for all owned, hired, and non owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1 Any Auto) with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (iii) WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required under the California Labor Code.
(iv) EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY insurance with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 disease policy limit and $1,000,000 disease each employee.
(v) BUILDERS RISK (Course of Construction) insurance in an amount equal to the completed value of the project with no coinsurance penalty provisions. (Only required if the project includes new construction of a building; or renovation of, or addition to, an existing building.)
(vi) CONTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY (Unless waived in
writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is required for all environmental and water remediation work and for all work transporting fuel. Unless waived in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, Contractors Pollution Liability is also required for demolition, renovation, HVAC, plumbing or electrical (including, without limitation, lighting) work on any structure built prior to the year 1990.) insurance with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$1,000,000 per occurrence or claim
$2,000,000 general aggregate per annual policy period
In the event Contractor purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the minimum limits of insurance set forth above, this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).

Should this Contract involves any lead based, mold or asbestos environmental hazard, either the Automobile Liability insurance policy or the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include Transportation Pollution Liability insurance covering materials to be transported by Contractor pursuant to the Contract.

In the event this Contract involves any lead-based environmental hazard (e.g., lead based paint), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for lead based environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any asbestos environmental hazard (e.g., asbestos remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for asbestos environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any mold environmental hazard (e.g., mold remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for mold environmental hazards and “microbial matter including mold” within the definition of “Pollution” under the policy.

Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be

Agreement-5
declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its officers, officials, employees and agents; or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form. The Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be written on either an occurrence form, or a claims-made form. The General Liability (including ongoing operations and completed operations), Automobile Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policies shall name City, its officers, officials, employees and agents as an additional insured. All such policies of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The Builders Risk (Course of Construction) insurance policy shall be endorsed to name the City as a loss payee. Any Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The coverage(s) shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. If Contractor maintains higher limits of liability than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor.

Claims-Made Policies - If any coverage required is written on a claimsmade coverage form:
(i) The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Contract or the commencement of work by Contractor. (ii) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iii) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Contract, or work commencement date, Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iv) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.
(v) These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract.

Agreement-6
Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion prior to City’s execution of the Contract and before work commences.

Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Contract, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Contract.

If at any time during the life of the Contract or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Contract shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Contract. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Contract.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Contract. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

In the event of a partial or total destruction by the perils insured against of any or all of the work and/or materials herein provided for at any time prior to the final completion of the Contract and the final acceptance by the City of the work or materials to be performed or supplied thereunder, the Contractor shall promptly reconstruct, repair, replace, or restore all work or materials so destroyed or injured at his/her sole cost and expense. Nothing herein provided for shall in any way excuse the Contractor or his/her insurance company from the obligation of furnishing all the required materials and completing the work in full compliance with the terms of the Contract.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Contract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors' certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

3.2.10 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In constructing the Project, the Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders,

Agreement-7
bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.11 Bonds.

3.2.11.1 Performance Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Performance Bond in the amount of the total, not-toexceed $100,000, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by the City.

3.2.11.2 Payment Bond. Not required.

3.2.11.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in City’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the affected bond within 14 days of receiving notice from City. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the City, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least fourteen (14) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Agreement until any replacement bonds required by this section are accepted by the City. To the extent, if any, that the total compensation is increased in accordance with the Agreement, the Contractor shall, upon request of the City, cause the amount of the bonds to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the City. To the extent available, the bonds shall further provide that no change or alteration of the Agreement (including, without limitation, an increase in the total compensation, as referred to above), extensions of time, or modifications of the time, terms, or conditions of payment to the Contractor, will release the surety. If the Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.11.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted. The surety must be a California admitted surety with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII and satisfactory to the City. If a California admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all construction services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Extra work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Contractor. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

Agreement-8

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Contractor perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Contractor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City’s Representative.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Contractor, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Contractor of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Contractor shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Contractor shall be entitled to no further compensation. Contractor may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

Agreement-9

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the follow address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Contractor:

Hardy & Harper, Inc
32 Rancho Circle
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Attention: Michael Murray – Vice President
City:

City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: Director of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.4 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.5 Indemnification. To the furthest extent allowed by law including California Civil Code section 2782, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage) incurred by CITY, CONTRACTOR or any other person, and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees and litigation expenses), arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of performance of this Contract. CONTRACTOR'S obligations under the preceding sentence shall apply regardless of whether CITY or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers are passively negligent, but shall not apply to any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs or damages caused by the active or sole negligence, or the willful misconduct, of CITY or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.

If CONTRACTOR should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed under this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

Agreement-10
This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Contract.

3.5.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.

3.5.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.5.9 City’s Right to Employ Other Contractors. City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

3.5.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.5.11 Assignment or Transfer. Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.5.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be work days (Monday through Friday, excluding holidays). All references to Contractor include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Contractor, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

3.5.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.5.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

3.5.15 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.5.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5.17 Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely

Agreement-11
for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.

Contractor further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.5.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Contractor shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.5.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.5.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.5.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.6 Subcontracting.

3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

Name of Contractor: Hardy & Harper, Inc.
*By:
________________________________________________
Signature
Michael Murray, Vice President
NOTE: SIGNATURES OF CORPORATE OFFICIALS MUST BE NOTARIZED.

Agreement-12
Attach Certificate of Notary Acknowledgement
OWNER: CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation
*By:
________________________________________________
Greg Newton - Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________________________
Colin Burns, City Attorney

Agreement-13

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Maintenance Services
The Services may include, but not be limited to, all labor, materials, tools, equipment, appurtenances and incidentals for sawcutting, removal and replacement of various PCC including: sidewalk, curb, gutter, cross-gutter, driveways, handicapped ramps, etc. Removal and replacement of AC, AB, vegetation, native materials, traffic loops, striping (temporary and permanent), legends and markings, AC berm, adjustment of existing manholes and valves, under sidewalk drains, grinding of 6-foot wide and 0.10-foot depth, grinding of 12-foot wide and

0.10-foot lateral or water service and all appurtenant work where directed by the Director of Public Works, or his designee, pursuant to the rates set forth in Exhibit C of this Agreement.

The services shall be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book), latest edition, including all current supplements, addenda, and revisions thereof (hereinafter referred to as “Standard Specifications”) incorporated herein by this reference. Any provisions which supplement or modify the Standard Specifications are attached hereto as Special Provisions and incorporated herein by this reference.

Agreement-14
Exhibit B
Schedule of Annual On-Call Street Maintenance Services
The Contractor shall perform the Services on an as-needed basis. Upon notification by the City of required maintenance work, the Contractor will respond to commence and proceed diligently to completion of work on weekdays, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays as specified below:

Non-Emergency Work - The Contractor will be required to begin non-emergency work within 10 working days of notification and proceed without discontinuity in the progression of work over the intervening working days until completion. A penalty of $250 per day will be assessed for each day of delay of start beyond the start time as specified.

Prior to issuing a Notice to Proceed on a large work order in excess of 5% of the original total proposal price, the Engineer will schedule a preconstruction meeting to clarify the scope and order of work, required submittals and utilities.

The Contractor shall submit periodic progress reports to the Engineer by the tenth day of each month. The report shall include an updated construction schedule. Any deviations from the original schedule shall be explained. Progress payments will be withheld pending receipt of any outstanding reports. A detailed invoice shall be submitted with each request for progress payment.

Emergency Work - The Contractor will be required to begin work per set schedule of:

Time of Notification Repair Must Commence By
Prior to 12 Noon 5:00 PM the same day
After 12 Noon 9:00 AM the following day
Contractor shall proceed without discontinuity in the progression of work over the intervening days until completion. A penalty of $100 per hour for each hour after maximum response time will be assessed.

Liquidated damages will be assessed for late start or uncompleted work as specified in Section

3.2.7.1 of the Agreement. Failure of the Contractor to adhere to the above response requirement will be cause for the City to deduct any monies due or to become due to the Contractor under this Agreement.

Agreement-15
Exhibit C
Compensation for Annual On-Call Street Maintenance Services (see attached Hardy & Harper Proposal)

Agreement-16

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Obligee”) has awarded to ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ (hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement for the work described as follows:

ANNUAL ON-CALL STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
(FISCAL YEARS 2025-2026 THROUGH 2027-2028)
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

Services may include, but not be limited to, all labor, materials, tools, equipment, appurtenances and incidentals for sawcutting, removal and replacement of various PCC including: sidewalk, curb, gutter, cross-gutter, driveways, handicapped ramps, etc. Removal and replacement of AC, AB, vegetation, native materials, traffic loops, striping (temporary and permanent), legends and markings, AC berm, adjustment of existing manholes and valves, under sidewalk drains, grinding of 6-foot wide and 0.10-foot depth, grinding of 12-foot wide and 0.10-foot lateral or water service and all appurtenant work where directed by the Director of Public Works, or his designee, pursuant to the rates set forth in Exhibit C of this Agreement. (hereinafter referred to as the “Public Work”); and
WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in that certain contract for the said Public Work dated ___________________, (hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”), which Contract is incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract to perform the terms thereof and to provide a bond both for the performance and guaranty thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, ____________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and ____________________________________ ________________________________, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of____________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco in the sum of ______________________________________________________ Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its parts, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the one year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and indemnify and save harmless the Obligee, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of

Agreement-17
time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with enforcement of the bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this ____ day of _________, 2025.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
SURETY:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
Attorney-in-Fact

Agreement-18
The rate of premium on this bond is _________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $_____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate surety).

IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ________________________________ ________________________________
________________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or ________________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if ________________________________ different from above)
________________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and ________________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California) ________________________________ ________________________________

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )

Agreement-19
On this ____ day of ___________, in the year _________, before me, ______________________, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ____________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the _________________________ (Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the ______________________________ (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact.

Notary Public in and for said
State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:______________________________
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

Agreement-20

GENERAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From) _______________ (To)________________ Endorsement Effective Date ______________________________________

3. Named Insured _______________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured
_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________________ /_____________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention (Nil unless otherwise specified):
______________________________________________

7. Coverage is equivalent to:

Comprehensive General Liability Form GL0002 (Ed. 1/73)
______________________________________________
Commercial General Liability “Occurrence” Form CG0001
______________________________________________

8. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Coverage is:
____________________________________”occurrence”
Note: The City of Norco standard insurance requirements specify “occurrence” coverage. “Claims-made” coverage is not acceptable. If commercial general liability form or equivalent is used, the general aggregate must apply separately to this location/project or the general aggregate must be twice the occurrence limit.

Agreement-21

9. Description of Project:

ANNUAL ON-CALL STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
(FISCAL YEARS 2025-2026 THROUGH 2027-2028)
The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

Services may include, but not be limited to, all labor, materials, tools, equipment, appurtenances and incidentals for sawcutting, removal and replacement of various PCC including: sidewalk, curb, gutter, cross-gutter, driveways, handicapped ramps, etc. Removal and replacement of AC, AB, vegetation, native materials, traffic loops, striping (temporary and permanent), legends and markings, AC berm, adjustment of existing manholes and valves, under sidewalk drains, grinding of 6-foot wide and 0.10-foot depth, grinding of 12-foot wide and 0.10-foot lateral or water service and all appurtenant work where directed by the Director of Public Works, or his designee, pursuant to the rates set forth in Exhibit C of this Agreement.

B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. As respects any work performed on the above described Project, the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased, or used by the Named Insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the Named Insured on the above described Project for or on behalf of the City of Norco; or (b) products sold by the Named Insured to the City of Norco for use on the Project; or (c) premises leased by the Named Insured from the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s schedule underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73), Comprehensive General Liability Insurance and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability endorsement; or

Agreement-22
(2) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, “Occurrence” Form CG 0001; or
(3) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Sections (1) and (2).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respects to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
______________________________
(Telephone Number)

Agreement-23
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________________________

Agreement-24

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #_____________________

1. Insurance Company _____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From)________________(To) _______________ Endorsement Effective Date ___________

3. Named Insured________________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________ /_____________________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention
(Nil unless otherwise specified):
$____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. The City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers, employees and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

Agreement-25

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers; or (b) stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 (“any auto”) and endorsement CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Section (1).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

Agreement-26
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
____________________________________________________
(Telephone Number)
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________

Agreement-27
WORKER’S COMPENSATION/EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ (“the Company”)
Policy Number _________________________________________________

2. Effective Date of this Endorsement ________________________________

3. Named Insured_________________________________________________

4. Employer’s Liability Limit (Coverage B)______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premium and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
(1) Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.
(2) Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the City of Norco.

Agreement-28
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, _______________________, warrant that I have authority to bind (Print/Type Name)
the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: ____________________________________________________ TITLE: ____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: ____________________________________________________

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-55

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEARS 2026-2030 CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL

STREET MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR THE ON-CALL STREET

MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Years 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for the City of Norco, California was adopted by the City Council on June 18, 2025; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the CIP Budget to incorporate additional funds for the FY 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program Budget; and WHEREAS, the requested amendment includes the addition of $100,000 for the On Call Street Maintenance Service Contract; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on August 6, 2025 approved the amendment to the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2026-2030 to include additional funds of $100,000 for the On-Call Street Maintenance Services.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on August 6, 2025
______________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Resolution No. 2025-55

August 6, 2025
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on August 6, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on August 6, 2025. ________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.E.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate for the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo and Adopt Resolution No. 2025-53 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-53, designating Council Member Kevin Bash as the voting delegate to represent the City of Norco at the 2025 League of California Cities Annual Conference and Council Member Greg Bowen as alternate.

SUMMARY:

The League of California Cities will be hosting its Annual Conference in October 2025.

An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting. In order to vote at that meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate, along with up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. At this time Council Member Kevin Bash and Council Member Greg Bowen have committed to attending the League Annual Conference.

BACKGROUND:

The League of California Cities will be hosting its Annual Conference from October 8- 10, 2025. One important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting when the membership takes action on resolutions. Annual resolutions guide cities and the League in combined efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California.

Consistent with League bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates to be designated by the City Council. This designation must be done by Council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action or the Mayor or City Manager alone.

Council Member Kevin Bash and Council Member Greg Bowen are scheduled to attend the League Conference. Therefore, the Council is recommended to appoint Council Member Bash as the City’s voting delegate and Council Member Bowen as alternate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No financial impact as a result of this action.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience: Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No 2025-53 LCC Voting Delegate

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-53

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING ONE VOTING DELEGATE AND ONE
VOTING ALTERNATE FOR THE 2025 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA

CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE
WHEREAS, the League of California Cities will be hosting its Annual Conference, October 2025, and an important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting; and
WHEREAS, in order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate, along with up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, consistent with League bylaws, the designation must be done by Council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action or the Mayor or City Manager alone; and
WHEREAS, Council Member Kevin Bash and Council Member Greg Bowen will be attending the League of California Cities Annual Conference in October 2025.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, that the following are hereby designated as the voting delegate and alternate to represent the City of Norco at the League of California Cities 2025 Annual Conference, in October 2025:

1. Council Member Kevin Bash shall be designated as the voting delegate

2. Council Member Greg Bowen shall be designated as the voting delegate PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held August 6, 2025.

ATTEST:

Greg Newton, Mayor City of
Norco, California
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk

Resolution 2025-53 – Delegate and Alternate for 2025 LCC Annual Conference

August 6, 2025
City of Norco, California
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on August 6, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Norco, California on August 6, 2025.

Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 6, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.F.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Acceptance of Proposal and Award of Contract for On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the proposals and award a three-year contract to Superior Pavement Markings for Annual On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services, with an annual expenditure not to exceed $70,000.

SUMMARY:

Staff completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for bidding purposes and on July 14, 2025, three (3) proposals were received. The contract calls for the furnishing on an "as needed" basis, all labor, materials, tools, equipment, appurtenances and incidentals to provide street striping and pavement marking services.

BACKGROUND:

Staff completed an RFP for Annual On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services with a total of three proposals received from Chrisp Company, Superior Pavement Markings and WGJ Enterprises (See Bid Summary). The general items of work to be done consist of street striping and legend marking with paint and thermoplastic materials, removal of existing striping and pavement legends including crosswalks, direction arrows, stop bars and the installation of raised dot reflective markers. All related work is required to meet the satisfaction and acceptance of the Public Works Direction or his designee.

Staff reviewed all proposals submitted and determined that Superior Pavement Markings had the most competitive costs (See Proposal).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed service maintenance agreement is funded from portions of the Gas Tax Street Operations Fund (133.801.34100) in the amount of $20,000, Water Fund (124.804.34100) in the amount of $25,000, and the Sewer Fund (126.809.34100) in the amount of $25,000. The contract is a not-to-exceed amount of $70,000 annually.

Funding for this contract is included in the FY 2025-2026 Operating Budget.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent and supports Strategic Direction #5 - Infrastructure and Asset Management: Ensure timely preservation, replacement, improvement and acquisition of infrastructure and capital assets.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Bid Summary
Proposal
Superior Pavement Markings Contract

SUMMARY SHEET

ANNUAL ON-CALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE

SERVICES

SUPERIOR PAVEMENT
MARKINGS CHRISP COMPANY WGJ ENTERPRISES, INC. dba PCI

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE 1 1 - 1,000 LF 4" Skip Yellow/White Stripe (paint) $ 0.40 $ 0.50 $ 15.00 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.24 $ 0.40 $ 0.50
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.17 $ 0.30 $ 0.40
2 1 - 1,000 LF 4" Solid Yellow/White Stripe (paint) $ 1.20 $ 0.65 $ 1.70 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.98 $ 0.60 $ 0.60
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.45 $ 0.50 $ 0.55
3 1 - 1,000 LF 8" Skip Yellow/White Stripe (paint) $ 0.88 $ 0.80 $ 1.65 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.35 $ 0.75 $ 0.65
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.20 $ 0.65 $ 0.60
4 1 - 1,000 LF 8" Solid Yellow/White Stripe (paint) $ 0.88 $ 0.85 $ 1.80 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.35 $ 0.80 $ 0.80
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.20 $ 0.70 $ 0.70
5 1 - 1,000 LF Broken Double Yellow Stripe (paint) $ 0.67 $ 0.80 $ 1.50 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.52 $ 0.75 $ 0.60
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.29 $ 0.65 $ 0.45
6 1 - 1,000 LF Double Yellow Stripe (paint) $ 0.77 $ 0.85 $ 1.70 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 0.52 $ 0.75 $ 0.80
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.33 $ 0.70 $ 0.60
7 1 - 1,000 LF
12" Solid Crosswalk White/Yellow Stripe (paint)
$ 5.50 $ 4.25 $ 20.00
1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 4.30 $ 4.00 $ 6.00
Over 5,000 LF $ 3.70 $ 3.50 $ 3.50
8 1 EA "Keep Clear" Legend (paint) $ 315.00 $ 175.00 $ 300.00 9 1 EA "Shared Bike Lane" Marking (paint) $ 75.00 $ 95.00 $ 200.00 10 1 EA "Stop Ahead" Legend (paint) $ 315.00 $ 215.00 $ 300.00 11 1 EA "Signal Ahead" Legend (paint) $ 385.00 $ 275.00 $ 350.00 12 1 EA "Slow School Xing" Legend (paint) $ 490.00 $ 350.00 $ 400.00 13 1 EA "Bike Lane" Legend (paint) $ 75.00 $ 135.00 $ 100.00 14 1 EA "Stop and Bar" Legend (paint) $ 215.00 $ 185.00 $ 400.00 15 1 EA Type I Arrow - 10 ft (paint) $ 52.00 $ 70.00 $ 35.00 16 1 EA Type IV Arrow (paint) $ 52.00 $ 75.00 $ 35.00
17 1 EA Type VI Arrow (paint) $ 70.00 $ 125.00 $ 150.00 18 1 EA Type VII Arrow (paint) $ 72.00 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 19 1 EA Misc. Letter (paint) $ 35.00 $ 25.00 $ 16.00
20 1 EA Install Raised Pavement Marker $ 7.10 $ 5.50 $ 6.00 21 1 - 250 LF Remove Striping or Markings (paint) $ 20.55 $ 4.00 $ 100.00 251 - 500 LF $ 8.60 $ 3.50 $ 12.00
Over 500 LF $ 5.74 $ 3.00 $ 4.00

SUMMARY SHEET

ANNUAL ON-CALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE

SERVICES

SUPERIOR PAVEMENT
MARKINGS CHRISP COMPANY WGJ ENTERPRISES, INC. dba PCI

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE 22 1 - 1,000 LF 4" Skip Yellow/White Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 1.50 $ 0.80 $ 2.50 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 1.10 $ 0.75 $ 1.20
Over 5,000 LF $ 0.65 $ 0.65 $ 0.80
23 1 - 1,000 LF 4" Solid Yellow/White Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 2.64 $ 0.95 $ 2.80 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 1.90 $ 0.90 $ 1.60
Over 5,000 LF $ 1.44 $ 0.80 $ 0.95
24 1 - 1,000 LF 8" Skip Yellow/White Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 4.28 $ 1.50 $ 3.20 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 3.61 $ 1.40 $ 1.40
Over 5,000 LF $ 1.20 $ 1.30 $ 1.00
25 1 - 1,000 LF 8" Solid Yellow/White Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 4.28 $ 1.75 $ 3.65 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 3.61 $ 1.65 $ 2.00
Over 5,000 LF $ 1.20 $ 1.50 $ 1.50
26 1 - 1,000 LF Broken Double Yellow Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 3.05 $ 1.25 $ 3.60 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 2.38 $ 1.20 $ 1.50
Over 5,000 LF $ 1.95 $ 1.15 $ 1.00
27 1 - 1,000 LF Double Yellow Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 3.40 $ 1.40 $ 4.00 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 2.56 $ 1.30 $ 2.00
Over 5,000 LF $ 2.05 $ 1.25 $ 1.35
28 1 - 1,000 LF 12" Solid Crosswalk White/Yellow Stripe (thermoplastic) $ 7.54 $ 6.50 $ 20.00 1,001 - 5,000 LF $ 5.63 $ 6.25 $ 10.00
Over 5,000 LF $ 4.05 $ 5.75 $ 6.00
29 1 EA "Keep Clear" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 810.00 $ 275.00 $ 800.00 30 1 EA "Shared Bike Lane" Marking (thermoplastic $ 170.00 $ 135.00 $ 300.00 31 1 EA "Stop Ahead" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 810.00 $ 375.00 $ 700.00 32 1 EA "Signal Ahead" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 990.00 $ 450.00 $ 800.00 33 1 EA "Slow School Xing" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 1,260.00 $ 575.00 $ 900.00 34 1 EA "Bike Lane" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 170.00 $ 160.00 $ 250.00 35 1 EA "Stop and Bar" Legend (thermoplastic) $ 460.00 $ 290.00 $ 500.00 36 1 EA Type I Arrow - 10 ft (thermoplastic) $ 88.00 $ 110.00 $ 100.00 37 1 EA Type IV Arrow (thermoplastic) $ 88.00 $ 125.00 $ 100.00 38 1 EA Type VI Arrow (thermoplastic) $ 376.00 $ 250.00 $ 265.00 39 1 EA Type VII Arrow (thermoplastic) $ 140.00 $ 175.00 $ 350.00 40 1 EA Misc. Letter (thermoplastic) $ 90.00 $ 40.00 $ 60.00 41 1 - 500 LF Remove Striping or Markings (thermoplastic) $ 20.55 $ 4.00 $ 20.00 501 - 1,000 $ 8.60 $ 3.50 $ 7.00
Over 1,000 $ 5.74 $ 3.00 $ 3.00

Experience 2023
City of San Dimas
Esau Ramos, (909) 208-9431, [email protected]
Project Name: Striping on San Dimas and Lone Hill
Completed: 12/2023
Contract Amount: $48,004.00
City of Covina
Hugo Guerrero, (626) 705-6300, [email protected]
Project Name: Annual Striping Maintenance Contract FY 2019/2020 Completed: 10/2023
Contract Amount: $33,754.91
City of Murrieta
Jason Morrell, (951) 461-6400, [email protected]
Project Name: On-Call Street Striping & Pavement Marking Maintenance Services 2023 -2024
Completed: 08/2023
Contract Amount: $26,718.00
City of Signal Hill
Arvin Pacheco, (562) 335-9513, [email protected] Project Name: Segment B Striping Measurement
Completed: 07/2023
Contract AMount: 28,216.33
City of San Dimas
Esau Ramos, (909) 208-9431, [email protected]
Project Name: Arterial Restripe in Various Locations at the City of San Dimas Completed: 06/2023
Contract Amount: $98,927.46
City of Irvine
Jose Alvarado, (562) 762-5711, [email protected] Project Name: As-Needed Street Striping Services 21-3028 Completed: 07/2023
5312 Cypress St Cypress Ca Tel. 714.995.9100 Fax 714.995.9400

Contract Amount: $588,572.93
5312 Cypress St Cypress Ca Tel. 714.995.9100 Fax 714.995.9400

Experience 2024
City of Baldwin Park
Anthony Vazquez, (626) 960-3993, [email protected] Project Name: Los Angeles Street Repainting Little John St to Park Ave) Completed: 01/2024
Contract Amount:$13,846.00
City of Arcadia
Dave Thompson, (626) 254-2726, [email protected]
Project Name: Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services Completed: 02/2024
Contract Amount: $113,264.00
City of San Marino
Chris Gutierrez, (626) 300-0793, [email protected] Project Name: Restriping Los Robles
Completed: 03/2024
Contract Amount: $29,870.00
City of Costa Mesa
Henry Granados, (714) 327-7472, [email protected] Project Name: Street Striping & Thermoplastic Markings (22-09) Completed: 04/2024
Contract Amount: $159,612.00
City of San Dimas
Esau Ramos, (909) 208-9431, [email protected]
Project Name: Repaint Citywide Schools
Completed: 06/2024
Contract Amount: $26,837.60
5312 Cypress St Cypress Ca Tel. 714.995.9100 Fax 714.995.9400

Agreement-1

CITY OF NORCO

ANNUAL ON-CALL SERVICES FOR STREET STRIPING

AND PAVEMENT MARKING AGREEMENT
(FISCAL YEARS 2025-26 to 2027-28)

1. Parties and Date.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of August, 2025 by and between the City of Norco, a municipal corporation of the State of California, located at 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860, County of Riverside, State of California, (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and Superior Pavement Markings, Inc., a corporation with its principal place of business at 5312 Cypress Street, Cypress, CA 90630 (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”).

City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

2. Recitals.

2.1 Contractor.

Contractor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain maintenance services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Contractor represents that it is experienced in providing street striping and pavement marking services to public clients, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the Services in the State of California, and that is familiar with the plans of the City.

2.2 Project.

Contractor desires to engage Contractor to render such services for the Annual On-Call Street Striping and Pavement Marking Projects ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

3. Terms.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Contractor promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply street striping and pavement marking services on an as-needed basis necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. The Contractor shall not conduct any work unless provided written direction by the City (including location, services requested, linear footage, etc.) and cannot be exceeded without written approval of the City.

3.1.2 Term. The terms of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years from August 6, 2025 to June 30, 2028. Contractor shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

Agreement-2

3.2 Responsibilities of Contractor.

3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Project shall be constructed by Contractor or under its supervision. Contractor will determine the means, methods and details of constructing the Project subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Contractor on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

Any additional personnel constructing the Project under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with the construction of the Project under this Agreement and as required by law. Contractor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Contractor shall construct the Project expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Project timeframe set forth herein. Contractor represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to construct the Project in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Contractor’s conformance with the Project timeframe, City shall respond to Contractor’s Requests for Information in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Contractor shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Project timeframe.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the Director of Public Works, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.5 Contractor’s Representative. Contractor hereby designates Darren Veltz – President, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Contractor’s Representative”). Contractor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Contractor for all purposes under this Agreement. The Contractor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Project, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Project under this Agreement.

3.2.6 Coordination of Project. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the construction of the Project and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.7 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Contractor shall construct the Project under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Contractor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to construct the Project. Contractor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to construct the Project. Finally, Contractor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to construct the Project, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained

Agreement-3
throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Contractor shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Contractor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Contractor or its sub-contractors who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to construct the Project in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Contractor and shall not be re-employed to perform any work on the Project.

3.2.7.1 Period of Performance and Liquidated Damages. Contractor shall perform and complete the Project under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section

3.1.2 above (“Term”). Contractor shall construct the Project in strict accordance with any timeframe provided herein, or which may be provided separately in writing to the Contractor.

Contractor agrees that if the Project is not completed within the aforementioned Term and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule or Project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum of $500.00 per working day:

3.2.8 Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Contractor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Project. If the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.9 Insurance.

3.2.9.1 Time for Compliance. Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.9.2 Minimum Requirements. Throughout the life of this Contract, Contractor shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A- VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) as may be authorized in writing by City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations,