Agenda packet — Oakdale City Council, March 3, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Monday, March 3, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
Welcome to your City of Oakdale City Council Meeting
Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith Council Member Jarod Pitassi Council Member Jeff Kettering Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert The meeting will be televised on Comcast Channel 7 and available for public viewing on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@CityofOakdaleca

1. Call to Order – 7:00 p.m.

2. City Council Members Present/Absent

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Invocation Provided by Ryan Poling of The River Christian Community

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing City Manager Bryan Whitemyer for 12 Years of Service to the City of Oakdale.

6. Additions / Deletions to the Agenda.

7. Public Comments
Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3, the City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the business on the agenda can be conducted, therefore all members of the public will be given 3 minutes for their public comments. Individuals may not defer their time to another person. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for general public comment. For agenda items, a maximum of 30 minutes will be allotted for public comment on each specific agenda item. California law prohibits the City Council from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Council. All items will be referred to staff for follow-up and/or placed on a future agenda.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.6, unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of February 18, 2025.

9.2 Approve the Special City Council Meeting Minutes of February 25, 2025.

9.3 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period February 12, 2025 - February 24, 2025.

9.4 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

9.5 Accepting the January 2025 Treasurer’s Report.
1 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, March 3, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-014 Next Ordinance: 1288

9.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 20-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

10. Public Hearings

10.1 Consider Amendment to Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Prezone, Addendum to Environmental Impact Report and Annexation Application No. 2017-17, the Specific Plan Area is Approximately 297-acres Located within the Southeastern Portion of the City of Oakdale.

Recommended Action: (1) Adopt a Resolution adopting an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, amendment to the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, and a General Plan Amendment; (2) Introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance Prezoning the parcels located in the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan; (3) Adopt a Resolution of Application to Initiate Proceedings for the Reorganization of the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan.

10.2 Introduction and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Introducing Chapter 21 Titled Oakdale Entertainment Zone to the Oakdale Municipal Code Designating an Entertainment Zone on Third Avenue between E and F Streets on Saturdays from 8am through 11am from May through September in conjunction with Oakdale Morning Market.

Recommended Action: Introduce and Waive the First Reading of the Ordinance Introducing Chapter 21 Titled Oakdale Entertainment Zone Designating an Entertainment Zone on Third Avenue between E and F Streets on Saturdays from 8am through 11am from May through September in conjunction with the Oakdale Morning Market.

10.3 Consider a Resolution Approving Adjustment to the City’s Capital Facilities Fees (CFF) in Accordance with Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et. Seq.

Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution approving adjustments to the Capital Facilities Fees (CFF) in accordance with 2016 CFF Nexus Study and Chapter 7, Article XIIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq.

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Selecting Oakdale Police Chief Jerry Ramar as the Interim City Manager for the City of Oakdale Effective March 7, 2025 and Approving an Employment Agreement that Articulates Chief Ramar’s Compensation and Duties as the Interim City Manager.

Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution selecting Oakdale Police Chief Jerry Ramar as the Interim City Manager of the City of Oakdale effective March 7, 2025 and approving an employment agreement that articulates Chief Ramar’s compensation and duties as the Interim City Manager.
2 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, March 3, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-014 Next Ordinance: 1288

12. City Manager’s Report

13. City Council Items

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held on Monday, March 17, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Hall, 209-845-3571. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 280 North Third Avenue, Oakdale, California.

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Colleen Andersen, Council Services and Legislative Records Manager/Deputy City Clerk for the City of Oakdale, certify that I caused to be posted a copy of the City of Oakdale City Council Agenda for the Regular Meeting of Monday, March 3, 2025 at the City Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue, Oakdale, CA, 95361 on February 27, 2025.

Dated: February 27, 2025 /s/ Colleen Andersen
Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk
Council Services and Legislative Records Manager
3 AGENDA ITEM 5.1
Recognizing City Manager Bryan Whitemyer for 12 Years of Service to the City of Oakdale.
4 CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:00 PM City Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Barios called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:

Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith
Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Jarod Pitassi
Council Member Jeff Kettering

3. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bairos led the pledge of allegiance.

4. Invocation
Pastor Clifton Curry of Mountain View Church provided the invocation.

5. Presentations/Acknowledgements

5.1 Recognizing the Oakdale Soccer Club NorCal State Cup U9 Girls Gold Champion.

Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council recognized the Oakdale Soccer Club NorCal State Cup U9 Girls.

6. Report Out of Closed Session / Additions / Deletions Mayor Bairos reported out of Closed Session that direction was given to Staff.

There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

7. Public Comments
Mayor Bairos opened Public Comment.

Alvin Lee spoke regarding feral cat problem near the river.

There being no further public comment, Mayor Bairos closed the Public Comment period.

8. Appointment to Boards, Commissions, Committees

9. City Council Consent Agenda
The consent agenda is comprised of Items 9.1 through 9.7. Unless there is discussion by a member of the audience/Council they may be approved in one motion.

9.1 Approve the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2025.

9.2 Receive and file the Warrant List for the period January 28, 2025 - February 11, 2025.

9.3 Waive all readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, except by Title.

AGENDA ITEM 9.1
5 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-006 Next Ordinance: 1288

9.4 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Chief of Police or his Designee to Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Oakdale Saddle Club.

9.5 By Minute Order Approve the Request to Remove One (1) Oak Tree Located at 120 Woods Creek Drive.

9.6 Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Two (2) Year Agreement with a Potential One Year Extension with Bear Electrical Solutions for Traffic Signal Maintenance Services in the Amount of $6,240.00 Annually to be Funded from General Fund 110 Street Lights / Traffic Signals.

9.7 Adopt a Resolution Updating the Maintenance Worker and Executive Secretary Job Descriptions to Bring them into Alignment with Current Duties, Responsibilities and Job Industry Standards.

MOTION
To approve the City of Oakdale City Council February 18, 2025, Consent Agenda.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Kettering PASSED this 3rd day of February 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Kettering, Gilbert, Pitassi, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

10. Public Hearings

11. Staff Reports

11.1 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of One Harper Hawk Turf Sweeper from Turf Star Western in the Amount of $54,187.50, One Toro Z Master 7500-D Zero-Turn Mower from Turf Star Western in the Amount of $24,629.68, One Toro Workman GTX Utility Vehicle from Turf Star Western in the Amount of $20,129.21 and One Mower Trailer from Johnson Manufacturing in the Amount of $13,607.67 with a Total Cost of $112,554.06 to be Funded from Parks Replacement Fund 549 and Appropriate $3,000 from Park Replacement Fund 549 Reserves to Cover Cost of Purchases.

Flett & Public Services Property Supervisor Milam provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. With no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-009, authorizing the purchase of one Harper Hawk Turf Sweeper from Turf Star Western in the amount of $54,187.50, one Toro Z Master 7500-D Zero6

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-006 Next Ordinance: 1288 Turn Mower from Turf Star Western in the amount of $24,629.68, one Toro Workman GTX Utility Vehicle from Turf Star Western in the amount of $20,129.21 and one Mower Trailer from Johnson Manufacturing in the amount of $13,607.67 with a total cost of $112,554.06 to be funded from Parks Replacement Fund 549 and appropriate $3,000 from Park Replacement Fund 549 Reserves to cover cost of purchases.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.2 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a One (1) Year Agreement with TruGreen L.P. for Weed Abatement Services in the Amount of $40,352.58 Annually to be Funded from Parks Maintenance Fund 110, Bridle Ridge LLMD Fund 284 and Vineyards LLMD Fund 286, with the Option of Three, One-Year Extensions.

Public Services Director Gravel provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. With no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-010, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a one (1) year agreement with TruGreen L.P. for weed abatement services in the amount of $40,352.58 annually to be funded from Parks Maintenance Fund 110, Bridle Ridge LLMD Fund 284 and Vineyards LLMD Fund 286, with the option of Three, One-Year Extensions.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Council Member Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Smith, Gilbert, Pitassi, Kettering, Bairos (5) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

11.3 Consider a Resolution Adopting a Policy for Application Submittal Requirements for Special Events that include a Street or Parking Lot Closure within the Oakdale Downtown Area.

Council Services Manager Andersen provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.
7 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
Next City Council Resolution: 2025-006 Next Ordinance: 1288 Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. With no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-011, approving a policy for application submittal requirements for Special Events that include a street or parking lot closure within the Oakdale Downtown Area.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

11.4 Consider a Resolution Adopting a City of Oakdale Code Enforcement Officer Safety Standards Policy.

Assistant to the City Manager Mondragon provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Bairos opened the item for public comment. With no public comment, Mayor Bairos brought the item back to the City Council and asked for a motion to be made.

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-012, adopting the City of Oakdale Code Enforcement Safety Standards Policy.

Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Smith, and seconded by Council Member Gilbert PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

11.5 Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) and Plan Area Fee (PAF) Reimbursement Agreement with Tesoro Homes, Inc. Related to the East F Street Corridor Specific Plan.

Public Services Director Gravel provided a PowerPoint presentation.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.
8 CITY OF OAKDALE

MOTION
Adopt City Council Resolution 2025-013, approving the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Oakdale and Tesoro Homes, Inc., relating to the Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) and Plan Area Fee (PAF) reimbursements for infrastructure improvements in the East F Street Corridor Specific Plan.

Moved by Council Member Gilbert, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Smith PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gilbert, Smith, Kettering, Bairos (4) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pitassi (1)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:None (0)
Motion carried 5/0 by City Council roll call vote.

12. City Manager’s Report

12.1 February Department Reports.

City Manager Whitemyer stated Department reports are in tonight’s agenda packet for reference.

13. City Council Items
Mayor Bairos announced Chamber of Commerce Annual Award Ceremony is Friday, February 28, 2025.

14. Adjournment
The next Regular meeting of the Oakdale City Council will be held Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 8:24 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor 9 CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers
277 North Second Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
“Cowboy Capital of the World”
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 1:00 PM City Council Chambers

1. CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Barios called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.

2. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT/ABSENT:

Present: Mayor Cherilyn Bairos
Mayor Pro Tem Christopher Smith
Council Member Kayleigh Gilbert
Council Member Jarod Pitassi
Council Member Jeff Kettering
Staff Present: City Manager Bryan Whitemyer
City Attorney Tom Hallinan
Council Services Manager/Deputy City Clerk Colleen Andersen

3. Public Comment
None.

4. Closed Session

4.1 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - Recruitment to Fill the Position of Interim City Manager Following Resignation Announcement of Current City Manager. (Pursuant to Government Code §54957 (b)(1))

4.2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT: - Interim City Manager (Pursuant to Government Code §54957)

5. Report Out of Closed Session.

Mayor Bairos reported out of closed session that direction was given to staff.

15. Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Bairos adjourned the meeting at 1:54 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Colleen Andersen, Deputy City Clerk Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor AGENDA ITEM 9.2
10 Amount
02/11/2025 5023905-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 02/11/2025 5023906-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023902-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023903-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023904-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023900-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023901-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 02/10/2025 5023786-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4102/10/2025 5023794-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 176 01/31/2025 5017597 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/04/2025 5022996-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 02/06/2025 5023479-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4101/10/2025 5014240-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4101/30/2025 5017410-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4101/31/2025 5017596-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 4002/11/2025 54333 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 156874 117-7440-425003 ALLPRO - 450 E A ST 45 02/11/2025 54336 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 156874 110-7413-425003 ALLPRO - 280 N 3RD AVE. 70 Vendor 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES Total: 165
Vendor: 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.

Vendor 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO Total: 36
Vendor: 1455 - ALL AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLIES LLC01/08/2025 CITOAK010825 ALL AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPL156873 657-4170-424001 PAINT FOR AIRPORT TAXI WAY 567.62 Vendor 1455 - ALL AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLIES LLC Total: 567.62 Vendor: 01197 - ALLPRO PEST SERVICES02/11/2025 54294 ALLPRO PEST SERVICES 156874 117-7460-425003 ALLPRO - 110 S 2ND AVE 5002/20/2025 138554 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 657-4170-429000 ABS DIRECT - MONTHLY BILLIN 50 Vendor 504 - ABS DIRECT INC. Total: 11055.78
Vendor: 558 - ALARMCO OF MODESTO01/28/2025 341638 ALARMCO OF MODESTO 156872 110-7210-425003 PARKS MONTHLY MONITORIN 3602/20/2025 138554 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 622-4153-429000 ABS DIRECT - MONTHLY BILLIN 2416.12 02/20/2025 138554 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 645-4161-425003 ABS DIRECT - MONTHLY BILLIN 1452.1802/20/2025 138554 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 645-4161-429000 ABS DIRECT - MONTHLY BILLIN 2416.1201/27/2025 138433 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 621-4159-442001 Community Notice Mailer SW 214.2501/27/2025 138433 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 621-4159-442001 Community Notice Mailer SW 214.2502/20/2025 138554 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 622-4153-425003 ABS DIRECT - MONTHLY BILLIN 1452.17 Vendor 5555555 - * Total: 842.8
Vendor: 9999999 - *02/19/2025 SPARKS, CASSANDRA SPARKS, CASSANDRA 156870 631-4180-340200 PARKING CITATION REFUND - 25 Vendor 9999999 - * Total: 25
Vendor: 504 - ABS DIRECT INC.01/15/2025 138335 ABS DIRECT INC. 156871 645-4160-429000 POSTAGE ON STATE MANDAT 2840.69

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item)Vendor: 5555555 - *02/13/2025 WHITEMYER, BRYAN 2/13/25 WHITEMYER, BRYAN 156869 110-1110-416001 WHITEMYER, BRYAN - TRAVEL 842.8 1 of 11
AGENDA ITEM 9.3
11 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1070 - AT&T Total: 36.01
02/01/2025 FEB 2025 AT&T 156880 645-4160-420003 238841-10807716 31.7101/14/2025 85526 ANDREWS ELECTRIC AND MAC156878 622-4151-424002 EQUIPMENT MOTOR REPAIRS 1690.86 Vendor 1492 - ANDREWS ELECTRIC AND MACHINE Total: 2837.27 Vendor: 1070 - AT&T02/01/2025 FEB 2025 AT&T 156880 645-4160-420003 248134-87506048 4.301/17/2025 218032 AMERICAN VALLEY WASTE OIL156877 657-4170-425003 AIRPORT OIL WASTE COLLECTI 144.5 Vendor 01036 - AMERICAN VALLEY WASTE OIL INC. Total: 144.5 Vendor: 1492 - ANDREWS ELECTRIC AND MACHINE01/14/2025 85529 ANDREWS ELECTRIC AND MAC156878 622-4151-424002 EQUIPMENT MOTOR REPAIRS 1146.41 02/12/2025 5024244-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 02/12/2025 5024246-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 41 Vendor 1469 - ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. Total: 3263 Vendor: 01036 - AMERICAN VALLEY WASTE OIL INC.02/11/2025 5023926-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 02/11/2025 5023927-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 02/11/2025 5023928-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 02/11/2025 5023923-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023924-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023925-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023920-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 02/11/2025 5023921-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 02/11/2025 5023922-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023917-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023918-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023919-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023914-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023915-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023916-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023911-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023912-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023913-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023908-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 40 02/11/2025 5023909-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 02/11/2025 5023910-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 10002/11/2025 5023907-SFL ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATO156875 622-4151-425003 DAILY WATER TESTING 100 1 of 11
12 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 06/30/2021 CORRECTION CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 156882 110-219-1900 CORRECTION 92.3 02/18/2025 CORRECTION 2 CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 156882 110-219-1900 CORRECITON 0.01 Vendor 01176 - CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES Total: 0.01
02/14/2025 INV02082 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEM156864 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR 2392.13 Vendor 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total: 2392.13 Vendor: 01176 - CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES11/01/2019 CM00010 CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 156882 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT CHILD SUPPOR -92.3 11/13/2024 85558606 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 156946 239-1910-442001 EMT Equipment 1076.0411/20/2024 85566463 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 156946 239-1910-442001 EMT Equipment 3595.01 Vendor 01567 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC Total: 4671.05
Vendor: 1361 - CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT02/06/2025 7549 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN156881 622-4152-427006 Invoice 7549 Sierra & D Pump 128.5 02/06/2025 7550 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN156881 622-4152-425003 Invoice 7550 Sewer Operation 488.5 Vendor 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC Total: 1049 Vendor: 01567 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
Vendor 942 - AT&T Total: 2257.71
Vendor: 1537 - BLACKWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
02/06/2025 7546 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN156881 720-3110-425003 Invoice 7546 CD2407 Sonoco - 72 02/06/2025 7547 BLACKWATER CONSULTING EN156881 622-4151-425003 Invoice 7547 WWTP 360 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 622-4152-420003 9391053400 126.04 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 622-4152-420003 9391053398 35.1 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 645-4160-420003 9391053398 35.1102/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-2110-420003 9391053390 254.602/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 118-7330-420003 9391053396 0.25 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 118-7340-420003 9391053285 43.4 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-2110-420003 9391059080 31.7502/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-2110-420003 9391053294 144.75 02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-2110-420003 9391064981 1328.32Vendor: 942 - AT&T02/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-1910-420003 9391053394 20.6202/01/2025 FEB. 2025 AT&T 156879 110-1910-420003 9391055865 237.77 1 of 11
13 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1574 - CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGIES INC. Total: 2828.25 Vendor 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP Total: 2000
Vendor: 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER02/14/2025 INV02079 COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTE156865 110-219-1700 COLONIAL LIFE 27.41 Vendor 1059 - COLONIAL PROCESSING CENTER Total: 27.41
Vendor: 1574 - CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.01/31/2025 91786 CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGI 156887 622-4151-425003 ANNUAL AND QUARTERLY REP 2828.25 Vendor 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC Total: 465
Vendor: 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL02/14/2025 37025229 CLARK PEST CONTROL 156885 110-4140-427009 PURCHASE ORDER STREETS/A 525 Vendor 50 - CLARK PEST CONTROL Total: 525
Vendor: 01240 - COLE PRO MEDIA CORP02/15/2025 4589 COLE PRO MEDIA CORP 156886 110-2110-425003 ENGAGEMENT ADVISING FY 24 2000 02/14/2025 INV02081 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10772 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 875.75 Vendor 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT Total: 1032.13 Vendor: 01646 - CIVICA LAW GROUP APC01/03/2025 15029 CIVICA LAW GROUP APC 156884 225-1910-425003 INVOICE 15029 46502/14/2025 INV02076 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS10771 110-219-0800 CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL AS 37 Vendor 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN Total: 37
Vendor: 1507 - CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOUNT02/14/2025 INV02080 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 10772 512-1910-374120 CITY OF OAKDALE FSA ACCOU 156.3802/17/2025 4221285871 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4152-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 317.12 02/17/2025 4221285871 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 645-4160-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 317.12 Vendor 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION Total: 3885.75
Vendor: 346 - CITY OF OAKDALE CITYHALL ASSN02/17/2025 4221285860 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 72.55 02/17/2025 4221285860 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 145.11 02/17/2025 4221285871 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-4140-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 253.7 02/10/2025 4220546878 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 72.5502/10/2025 4220546878 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 145.11 02/17/2025 4221285657 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 208.2802/10/2025 4220546791 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4152-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 302.2402/10/2025 4220546791 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 645-4160-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 302.2402/10/2025 4220546774 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 208.2802/10/2025 4220546791 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-4140-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 241.7902/03/2025 4219808019 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-4140-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 241.7902/03/2025 4219808019 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4152-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 302.2402/03/2025 4219808019 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 645-4160-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 302.2402/03/2025 4219807944 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 622-4151-425016 WEEKLY UNIFORM LAUNDRY S 208.2802/03/2025 4219807951 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 110-7210-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 81.7 02/03/2025 4219807951 CINTAS CORPORATION 156883 565-7215-425016 LANDSCAPING PARKS WEEKLY 163.41 Vendor: 1577 - CINTAS CORPORATION
1 of 11
14 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) 01/31/2025 9123-19013 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 130 Vendor 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC Total: 4350
01/30/2025 9123-18994 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 140 01/30/2025 9123-18995 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 45501/31/2025 9123-19012 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 6501/24/2025 9123-18878 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 133001/27/2025 9123-18883 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 132001/27/2025 9123-18915 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 45502/18/2025 CORRECTION EDWARD JONES 156896 110-219-1200 CORRECTION 0.01 Vendor 01633 - EDWARD JONES Total: 0.01
Vendor: 01585 - ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC01/23/2025 9123-18837 ENVIRONMENTAL.COM LLC 156897 645-4160-425003 PURCHASE ORDER MANDATO 455 Vendor 01630 - ECOFERT INC. Total: 450
Vendor: 01633 - EDWARD JONES11/22/2024 11/22/24 EDWARD JONES 156896 110-219-1200 CORRECTION 605 11/22/2024 CM00051 EDWARD JONES 156896 110-219-1200 BRYAN WHITEMYER ROTH IRA -605 Vendor 1323 - DITTOS Total: 670.18
Vendor: 01611 - DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED01/31/2025 4489 DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED156894 631-4180-425003 INVOICE #4489 1662.5 Vendor 01611 - DIXON RESOURCES UNLIMITED Total: 1662.5
Vendor: 01630 - ECOFERT INC.02/01/2025 6204 ECOFERT INC. 156895 343-7219-442001 Ecofert Fertility Program Servic 450 01/14/2025 1022314 DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL 156892 645-4160-427006 GENERAL SUPPLIES FOR STREE 887.96 Vendor 1336 - DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL Total: 1775.92
Vendor: 1323 - DITTOS01/16/2025 215452 DITTOS 156893 110-2110-427001 OPD NOTEBOOKS FOR PATROL 670.18 Vendor 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS Total: 2600
Vendor: 01638 - DAVID ORTIZ02/07/2025 JAN- FEB 2025 DAVID ORTIZ 156891 118-7320-425003 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS - JAN 760 Vendor 01638 - DAVID ORTIZ Total: 760
Vendor: 1336 - DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL01/14/2025 1022314 DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL 156892 110-4140-427006 GENERAL SUPPLIES FOR STREE 887.96 02/06/2025 445153 CRESCENT SUPPLY CO 156889 110-2110-427004 UNIFORM - H PETERSON 114.3 Vendor 59 - CRESCENT SUPPLY CO Total: 914.14
Vendor: 1193 - CSG CONSULTANTS02/09/2025 59500 CSG CONSULTANTS 156890 120-3130-425003 Standing PO - Fire Insp/Buildin 2600 02/06/2025 073017 CRESCENT SUPPLY CO 156889 110-2110-427004 UNIFORM - H PETERSON 244.9Vendor: 01207 - CRAMER FISH SCIENCES02/06/2025 SIN009748 CRAMER FISH SCIENCES 156888 234-1910-425003 INVOICE #SIN009748 103422.09 Vendor 01207 - CRAMER FISH SCIENCES Total: 103422.09
Vendor: 59 - CRESCENT SUPPLY CO01/17/2025 401125 CRESCENT SUPPLY CO 156889 110-2110-427027 CAPS UNIFORMS 554.94 1 of 11
15 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA Total: 525
Vendor 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. Total: 87.66 Vendor: 01191 - INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE01/22/2025 10135926 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION156904 110-2110-416005 IACP MEMBERSHIP 220 Vendor 01191 - INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE Total: 220 Vendor: 01404 - KASSAHN.LAURA02/03/2025 JAN 2025 KASSAHN.LAURA 156905 118-7340-425003 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS - JAN 525 02/04/2025 125283 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG156902 622-4151-425003 SLUDGE HAULING ANNUAL 1000.5 Vendor 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Total: 9896.1 Vendor: 104 - GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC.01/31/2025 0334492 GROVER LANDSCAPE SERVICES156903 293-6250-425015 Tesoro I - Landscape for CFD 2 87.66 Vendor 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total: 193.58
Vendor: 96 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC.01/29/2025 18811709 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG156902 645-204-0100 HYDRANT METER REFUND 90002/04/2025 125282 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAG156902 622-4151-425003 SLUDGE HAULING ANNUAL 7995.6 01/28/2025 104287 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP156901 110-7210-427006 PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLI 211.33 Vendor 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. Total: 410.74 Vendor: 92 - FRANCHISE TAX BOARD02/14/2025 INV02084 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 156866 110-219-1900 GARNISHMENT - FTB 193.58 01/13/2025 0022569 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #14156900 645-4160-427006 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR 2011.48 Vendor 1096 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423 Total: 3106.15
Vendor: 1428 - FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC.01/24/2025 104237 FIRST CHOICE INDUSTRIAL SUP156901 110-2110-427004 GLOVES 199.41 01/29/2025 CAOAD146065 FASTENAL 156899 645-4160-427006 PPE FOR PUBLIC WORKS 778.02 Vendor 403 - FASTENAL Total: 1556.04
Vendor: 1096 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS #142301/23/2025 0020841 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #14156900 645-4160-427006 Water Utility Supplies - Greger 1094.67 02/18/2025 540325 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 216.78 Vendor 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE Total: 960.45 Vendor: 403 - FASTENAL01/29/2025 CAOAD146065 FASTENAL 156899 622-4152-427006 PPE FOR PUBLIC WORKS 778.0202/18/2025 540325 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 5.2902/18/2025 540325 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 5.2902/18/2025 540325 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2.6402/18/2025 540319 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 4.7102/18/2025 540319 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2.3602/18/2025 540319 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 193.2202/18/2025 540319 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 4.7101/16/2025 538511 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2161-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 2001/16/2025 538511 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2162-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 1001/16/2025 538511 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 742-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 475.45Vendor: 213 - FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF OAKDALE01/16/2025 538511 FAMILY VETERINARY CARE OF 156898 110-2160-425003 VETERINARY SERVICES 20 1 of 11
16 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 161 - MID Total: 34973.9
01/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 622-4152-420001 3818618731 924.601/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 645-4160-420001 5097728103 4026.4101/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 645-4160-420001 6201815675 5446.501/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 284-6210-420001 1337811713 65.2501/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 286-6230-420001 8551425139 761.5201/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 622-4151-420001 6483221405 18614.42 Vendor 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC. Total: 38425
Vendor: 161 - MID01/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 284-6210-420001 3151817535 3697.801/31/2025 JAN 2025 MID 156914 284-6210-420001 1122819817 1437.401/30/2025 20644 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 215-4149-442001 Standing PO for Design - CP232 6840 01/30/2025 20646 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 216-4149-442001 CHANGE ORDER #1 1846002/18/2025 20647 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 215-4149-442001 Standing PO for Design of N. 7 6070 01/30/2025 20637 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20637 CD2104 MCR 4355 01/30/2025 20638 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20638 CD2307 MCR 720 01/30/2025 20642 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 540-1910-442001 CP2127 Construction Engineer 1260 Vendor 01442 - LEIST AND ASSOCIATES Total: 1284.4
Vendor: 01629 - LIONUDAKIS FIREWOOD INC.01/21/2025 7852-1 LIONUDAKIS FIREWOOD INC. 156912 229-1910-320403 Tree Removal - OWR1 Grant 9850 Vendor 01629 - LIONUDAKIS FIREWOOD INC. Total: 9850
Vendor: 158 - MCR ENGINEERING INC.01/30/2025 20635 MCR ENGINEERING INC. 156913 720-3110-425003 Invoice 20635 CD2029 MCR 720 Vendor 64 - L.N. CURTIS & SONS Total: 758.63
Vendor: 01131 - L2 LIGHTING LLC01/17/2025 9092B L2 LIGHTING LLC 156910 657-4170-424002 AIRPORT LIGHTING FIXTURES 1558.08 Vendor 01131 - L2 LIGHTING LLC Total: 1558.08
Vendor: 01442 - LEIST AND ASSOCIATES02/06/2025 0000300 LEIST AND ASSOCIATES 156911 515-1910-425003 INVOICE #0000300 1284.411/22/2024 12806 KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. 156908 622-4151-427006 POLYMER FOR DEWATERING 2340.9 Vendor 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC. Total: 2340.9
Vendor: 64 - L.N. CURTIS & SONS01/22/2025 INV907921 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 156909 110-2110-427004 CARRIERS - RAWLINS AND ALT 758.63 01/31/2025 0000640624 KOEFRAN 156907 110-2161-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 175.601/31/2025 0000640624 KOEFRAN 156907 110-2162-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 87.8 Vendor 01236 - KOEFRAN Total: 439
Vendor: 1230 - KUBWATER RESOURCES INC.01/31/2025 25-0172 KCI SITE SERVICES 156906 622-4151-425003 WEEKLY SWEEPING SERVICES 408 Vendor 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES Total: 816
Vendor: 01236 - KOEFRAN01/31/2025 0000640624 KOEFRAN 156907 110-2160-425003 SHELTER SERVICES FY 24/25 175.6 Vendor: 1476 - KCI SITE SERVICES10/31/2024 24-1072 KCI SITE SERVICES 156906 622-4151-425003 WEEKLY SWEEPING SERVICES 408 1 of 11
17 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC. Total: 1080
01/31/2025 41747 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 156921 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER ONGOING P 540 02/14/2025 INV02085 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10775 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD 643.5 Vendor 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 624 Vendor: 1563 - ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES INC.01/31/2025 41746 ONTEL SECURITY SERVICES IN 156921 110-7210-425003 PURCHASE ORDER ONGOING P 540 01/27/2025 CM00056 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10775 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD -19.5 01/27/2025 CM00058 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10775 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD -19.501/27/2025 INV02068 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10775 110-219-0900 OAKDALE PD LTD 19.5 02/14/2025 INV02077 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10774 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 82502/14/2025 INV02086 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10774 110-219-0900 PORAC/LDF/LTD/STD 104.25 Vendor 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Total: 929.25 Vendor: 209 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Vendor 207 - OAKDALE LOCKSMITH Total: 375.85
Vendor: 208 - OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION01/27/2025 CM00055 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10774 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES -25 01/27/2025 INV02067 OAKDALE POLICE OFFICERS AS10774 110-219-0800 ASSOCIATION DUES 25 Vendor 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Total: 62
Vendor: 206 - OAKDALE LEADER02/19/2025 386253 OAKDALE LEADER 156919 110-1130-425011 Oakdale Leader Notice Board / 381.81 Vendor 206 - OAKDALE LEADER Total: 381.81
Vendor: 207 - OAKDALE LOCKSMITH
01/31/2025 46802 OAKDALE LOCKSMITH 156920 110-2110-425003 KEYS 375.8501/23/2025 CL0000004150 1/4/25 OAK VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL H156918 565-7215-425003 DOT EXAMS 150.01 Vendor 1010 - OAK VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Total: 562.01 Vendor: 198 - OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION02/14/2025 INV02078 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 10773 110-219-0800 OAKDALE EMPLOYEES ASSOCI 62 Vendor 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL Total: 1146.16
Vendor: 1010 - OAK VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH01/23/2025 CL0000004150 1/4/25 OAK VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL H156918 110-4140-425003 DOT EXAMS 309 01/23/2025 CL0000004150 1/4/25 OAK VALLEY OCCUPATIONAL H156918 110-4142-425003 DOT EXAMS 10301/17/2025 25-002 NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SE156916 110-2110-425006 BACKGROUND PRE-EMPLOYM 1445 Vendor 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES Total: 2919.4 Vendor: 01015 - NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL01/28/2025 302895 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL 156917 645-4160-427006 ON-GOING MONTHLY CHLORIN 1146.16 01/15/2025 031357 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQ156915 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS H-36 A 559.65 Vendor 173 - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT Total: 1117.53 Vendor: 01023 - NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES01/17/2025 25-001 NICKERSON INVESTIGATIVE SE156916 110-2110-425006 BACKGROUND PRE-EMPLOYM 1474.4 Vendor: 173 - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT01/15/2025 029025 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQ156915 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS H-36 A 557.88 1 of 11
18 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE Total: 163.4 Vendor: 01119 - PVP COMMUNICATIONS01/23/2025 135943 PVP COMMUNICATIONS 156927 110-2110-427004 MOTORS HELMET - MURRAY 1167.66 Vendor 01119 - PVP COMMUNICATIONS Total: 1167.66
02/01/2025 250103968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER156926 645-4160-425003 A SIMPLE SOLUTION - AFTER H 81.7 01/27/2025 27730 POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH 156925 110-2110-416005 PERF MEMBERSHIP 250 Vendor 01099 - POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORUM Total: 250 Vendor: 727 - PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SERVICE02/01/2025 250103968101 PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE SER156926 622-4152-425003 A SIMPLE SOLUTION - AFTER H 81.702/12/2025 FEB 2025 PGE 156924 288-6244-420001 47013986097 58.1502/12/2025 FEB 2025 PGE 156924 288-6245-420001 68565167456 21.18 Vendor 226 - PGE Total: 2277.23
Vendor: 01099 - POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORUM01/28/2025 JAN 2025 5 PGE 156924 622-4151-420001 529288 117.5502/12/2025 FEB 2025 PGE 156924 110-4142-420001 07875298122 15.8102/12/2025 FEB 2025 PGE 156924 288-6243-420001 01868963875 311.28 Vendor 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO. Total: 123.2 Vendor: 226 - PGE01/28/2025 JAN 2025 5 PGE 156924 110-7210-420001 60758610988 1242.7601/28/2025 JAN 2025 5 PGE 156924 622-4151-420001 529290 510.501/16/2025 2721-176495 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 45.13 Vendor 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC. Total: 1173.84 Vendor: 01216 - PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC STORAGE CO.02/18/2025 5248187 PACIFIC SHREDDING/PACIFIC S156923 110-2110-425003 SHRED SERVICE FOR FY 24/25 123.2 01/16/2025 2721-176360 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 64.08 01/16/2025 2721-176454 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 27.7901/16/2025 2721-176464 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 89.3801/13/2025 2721-175578 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 235.08 01/14/2025 2721-175834 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 159.4701/16/2025 2721-176343 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 56.31 01/07/2025 2721-174221 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 35.9201/08/2025 2721-174404 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 33.7601/09/2025 2721-174722 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 93.5901/06/2025 2721-173112 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 111.11 01/06/2025 2721-173266 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 64.08 01/06/2025 2721-173952 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORE156922 570-4120-427006 FLEET SERVICE REPAIRS 158.14 02/14/2025 INV02087 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 156867 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 1155 02/14/2025 INV02088 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 156867 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE MISC 735 Vendor 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #3 Total: 1890
Vendor: 62 - O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC.Vendor: 219 - OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL #301/27/2025 CM00057 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 156867 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC -35 01/27/2025 INV02069 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCA 156867 110-219-0800 UNION DUES - OAKDALE POLIC 35 1 of 11
19 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Vendor 01650 - TURLOCK TRUCK STUFF LLC Total: 946.99
Vendor 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC. Total: 165
Vendor: 01619 - THE ED JONES COMPANY01/15/2025 57359 THE ED JONES COMPANY 156938 545-2110-441005 BADGES 2401 Vendor 01619 - THE ED JONES COMPANY Total: 2401
Vendor: 01650 - TURLOCK TRUCK STUFF LLC01/02/2025 1461 TURLOCK TRUCK STUFF LLC 156939 621-4152-441009 NEW SEWER TRUCK H-43 MAT 946.99 Vendor: 281 - T.P. EXPRESS, INC.02/03/2025 42199 T.P. EXPRESS, INC. 156937 565-7215-425003 GREGER RESTROOM TRAILER 16502/09/2025 3282 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 156936 288-6244-425015 STERLING HILLS MONTHLY LAN 958.9302/09/2025 3283 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 156936 288-6243-425015 SUNSET MEADOWS MONTHLY 639.33 Vendor 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. Total: 9622.99
Vendor 1556 - SUTTER HEALTH PLAN Total: 81022.8
Vendor: 1328 - SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC.02/09/2025 3280 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 156936 285-6220-425015 BURCHELL HILL MONTHLY LAN 7712.99 02/09/2025 3281 SWIFT LAWN & GARDEN INC. 156936 288-6242-425015 PURCHASE ORDER FOR MONT 311.74 Vendor 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION Total: 749.12
Vendor: 1387 - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD12/04/2024 WD-0281496 STATE WATER RESOURCES CO156934 622-4152-425003 STATE WATER RESOURCE CON 3945 Vendor 1387 - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD Total: 3945 Vendor: 1556 - SUTTER HEALTH PLAN02/03/2025 3622156 SUTTER HEALTH PLAN 156935 110-219-1100 SUTTER HEALTH - MARCH COV 81022.8 Vendor 270 - STANISLAUS COUNTY CLERK/RECORDER Total: 20 Vendor: 1368 - STANISLAUS FOUNDATION02/18/2025 53906 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 156933 510-1910-425003 dental benefits 315 02/18/2025 53950 STANISLAUS FOUNDATION 156933 510-1910-425003 dental administration 434.12 Vendor 1227 - SIGNATURE SIGNS Total: 1556.27
Vendor: 01649 - ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC
12/31/2024 24189301 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC 156931 110-4142-425003 DECEMBER TRAFFIC SIGNAL RE 1030 Vendor 01649 - ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC Total: 1030
Vendor: 270 - STANISLAUS COUNTY CLERK/RECORDER02/10/2025 064-047-039-059 STANISLAUS COUNTY CLERK/R156932 645-4160-427006 LIEN RELEASE 1308 GRAND OA 20 02/08/2025 661 RP LANDSCAPING 156929 117-7460-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 1064.99 Vendor 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING Total: 2360
Vendor: 1227 - SIGNATURE SIGNS02/05/2025 14245 SIGNATURE SIGNS 156930 621-4159-442001 Construction Signs - CP2324 SW 1556.27 Vendor 01555 - RACO Total: 2700
Vendor: 01378 - RP LANDSCAPING02/08/2025 661 RP LANDSCAPING 156929 110-7413-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 315.2302/08/2025 661 RP LANDSCAPING 156929 117-7440-425015 RP LANDSCAPING - CITYHALL, 979.78Vendor: 01555 - RACO01/16/2025 INV-113103 RACO 156928 622-4150-425003 CALL OUT SUBSCRIPTION SERV 2700 1 of 11
20 Amount

WARRANT LIST
City of Oakdale, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 2/12/2025 - 2/24/2025
Post Date Payable Number Vendor Name Payment Number Account Number Description (Item) Grand Total:
02/05/2025 S2235534.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN156943 645-4160-424002 UPS BATTERY REPLACEMENT F 97.6 Vendor 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC. Total: 511.89 392772.49
Vendor: 01651 - WEST COAST TANK LINES INC.01/29/2025 445 WEST COAST TANK LINES INC. 156942 570-4120-427006 CARB TEST FOR TRUCK 115 Vendor 01651 - WEST COAST TANK LINES INC. Total: 115
Vendor: 326 - WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO INC.01/27/2025 S2234009.001 WILLE ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IN156943 110-4142-427006 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 414.29 01/26/2025 870628391-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 110-2110-427004 TELEPHONE 29.31 Vendor 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 3179.6
01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 622-4152-420004 TELEPHONE 751.68 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 645-4160-420004 TELEPHONE 704.13 01/26/2025 870628391-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 110-2110-420004 TELEPHONE 831.94 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 622-4151-427006 TELEPHONE 52.75 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 622-4151-427006 TELEPHONE 52.76 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 622-4151-427006 TELEPHONE 52.76 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 229-4110-420004 TELEPHONE 21.03 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 570-4120-420004 TELEPHONE 61.07 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 622-4151-420004 TELEPHONE 408.91 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 119-4110-420004 TELEPHONE 80.07 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 120-3120-420004 TELEPHONE 21.03 01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 120-3130-420004 TELEPHONE 52.93 Vendor 1278 - UBEO WEST LLC Total: 1853.6
Vendor: 1388 - VEHICLE REGISTRATION COLLECTIONS02/14/2025 INV02083 VEHICLE REGISTRATION COLLE156868 110-219-1900 Garnishment - VRC 200 Vendor 1388 - VEHICLE REGISTRATION COLLECTIONS Total: 200 Vendor: 308 - VERIZON WIRELESS01/26/2025 570624185-00002 1/26/25 VERIZON WIRELESS 156941 110-4140-425003 TELEPHONE 59.23 02/04/2025 4783352 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 119-4110-423000 UBEO COPIER USAGE 45.2 02/04/2025 4783352 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 622-4152-423000 UBEO COPIER USAGE 67.802/04/2025 4783352 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 645-4160-423000 UBEO COPIER USAGE 67.801/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 645-4160-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 98.0502/04/2025 4783352 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 110-1910-423000 UBEO COPIER USAGE 214.52 02/04/2025 4783352 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 110-2110-423000 UBEO COPIER USAGE 477.74 01/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 119-4110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 98.0501/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 120-3110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 98.0501/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 622-4152-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 98.05Vendor: 1278 - UBEO WEST LLC01/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 110-1910-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 196.11 01/31/2025 38289597 UBEO WEST LLC 156940 110-2110-423000 UBEO - COPIER CONTRACT 392.23 1 of 11
21 AGENDA ITEM 9.4
By Motion, Waive all Readings of Ordinances and
Resolutions, except by Title.
22 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Report Date: February 18, 2025
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Albert Avila, Finance Director
Alanna Bryant, City Treasurer
Subject: January 31, 2025 Treasurer’s Report
I. BACKGROUND
The Treasurer’s Report for the month of January 2025 is attached.

II. DISCUSSION
The Treasurer’s Report represent the schedule of cash and investments for the City. The schedule reflects the reconciled cash balances at the end of each month for checking, savings, investments, customer service cash drawers and petty cash.

III. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Treasurer Report as presented.

IV. ATTACHMENTS
Treasurer’s Report dated January 31, 2025.

AGENDA ITEM 9.5
23 24

CHECKING PAYROLL TOTAL
BANK STATEMENT BALANCE 2,800,000.00 28,779.66 2,828,779.66 OUTSTANDING DEPOSITS 93,776.98 - 93,776.98
OUTSTANDING CHECKS (140,663.86) (220.54) (140,884.40)
ADJUSTED TOTAL 2,753,113.12 28,559.12 2,781,672.24
CASH DRAWERS 2,300.00
EMPLOYEE FSA CHECKING 8,231.11
SAVINGS - DIRECT DEPOSIT 795.03
SAVINGS 4,740,277.36
INVESTMENTS - CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 43,743,448.33
INVESTMENTS - LAIF 4,980,696.24
56,257,420.31
All Funds January 2024 January 2025
110 GENERAL FUND 7,083,926.72 4,034,416.58
114 CANNABIS FUND 639,980.94 652,669.04
115 MEASURE H 778.86 817.34
117 FACILITIES 35,397.04 46,359.87
118 RECREATION 41,976.05 47,335.92
119 ENGINEER & PW ADMIN 2,095.19 489.90
120 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 628,363.79 400,580.18
203 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 205,573.54 217,659.93
206 OTS - ENFORCEMENT GRANT (25,401.09) (20,898.15)
207 OFFICER WELLNESS GRANT 15,001.00 10,002.00
211 ASSET FORFEITURE 61,899.79 73,767.49
212 SB 2 PLANNING GRANT 56,000.00 53,999.00
213 LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GANT (LEAP) (6,518.00) (13,508.80) 214 SAFETY SALES TAX 213,152.42 260,523.49
215 GAS TAX 343,292.14 370,447.14
216 SB1-ROAD MAINTENANCE 1,135,264.68 1,134,885.26
217 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF 81,568.30 83,406.37
221 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 124,479.58 64,889.55
222 MEASURE L 2,540,220.36 2,954,366.23
224 REGIONAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING (25,338.70) (38,230.23) 225 COMPLIANCE MITIGATION REVOLVING FUND - 152,441.39
229 SOLID WASTE 292,206.81 454,559.78
230 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 167,737.45 233,403.70
231 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (71,000.00) (71,000.00) 232 SENIOR CENTER GRANTS 15,210.10 9,249.30
234 US FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT 404.00 (69,118.83) 235 CA FISH WILDLIFE RESTORATION GRANT (156.00) (54,895.45) 239 AMERICAN RECOVERY ACT FUND 2,053,818.38 263,200.01
241 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING 131,758.29 3,928.40
242 HOME - CONSORTIUM 2,500.84 0.84
243 HOME LOAN REUSE 69,444.61 13,984.61
245 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 366,108.12 370,545.02

CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2025
25 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2025
All Funds January 2024 January 2025
248 CAL HOME LOAN REUSE 180,759.62 5,119.62
252 BRIDLE RIDGE STREET MAINTENANCE 61,455.08 106,649.46 266 CDBG FUND -REUSE 102,726.00 102,726.00
267 CDBG 46,302.88 46,039.88
268 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT 115,942.03 109,224.88
270 EDUCATION / GOVERNMENT CTV 55,125.98 42,141.74
277 RIVERBANK ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 11,967.12 18,298.83 278 ESCALON ANIMAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FUND 7,073.34 13,296.40 284 BRIDLE RIDGE LLD (30,532.32) 86,309.56
285 BURCHELL HILL LLD (3,832.32) 13,149.18
286 VINEYARD LLD 504,744.16 528,300.44
288 LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 2003-1 317,807.24 356,292.86
291 FIRE SERVICES CFD 3,506.60 (11,028.35)
292 PUBLIC SAFETY CFD 89,786.04 3,386.26
293 MAINTENANCE SERVICES CFD 2015-01 523,718.74 551,290.53 294 STREET REPLACEMENT FUND 97,876.73 97,876.73
316 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION GRANTS (26,679.03) (107,946.58) 318 DORADA PARK GRANT (205,706.50) -
360 EAST F PLAN AREA FEE 45,422.17 228,393.05
462 Energy Efficiency & Conservation Debt Service (66,709.18) (252,389.32) 465 2005 LEASE BONDS DEBT SERVICE 15,603.10 17,138.62
467 2015 PENSION DEBT SERVICE 102,053.99 374,649.88
510 DENTAL INSURANCE 105,572.10 129,005.41
512 EMPLOYEE FSA FUND 2,153.24 13,950.77
515 RISK MANAGEMENT 622,254.95 311,970.93
520 EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 876,809.69 837,706.20
525 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 589,883.24 642,238.41
530 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 243,350.62 230,812.01
532 FIRE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 560,039.57 120,072.84
535 PERS LIABILITY FUND 2,369,321.61 1,857,413.30
540 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 1,574,350.30 2,218,566.90 542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 23,939.80 38,752.07
545 POLICE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 31,195.32 160,810.18
549 PARKS REPLACEMENT FUND 1,227,378.02 2,454,002.73
565 LLD MAINT SERVICES 65,757.39 54,051.48
570 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND - 38,635.20
620 SRF LOAN RESERVE 1,241,557.67 1,269,535.14
621 SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9,367,755.27 9,099,692.65 622 SEWER SANITATION 690,801.45 80,748.07
631 DOWN TOWN PARKING FUND 74,570.31 52,938.98
644 WATER CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 7,781,802.52 9,329,084.61 645 WATER 3,228,019.24 2,106,284.02
657 AVIATION FUND 109,242.85 126,044.38
658 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 146,133.62 375,410.24
659 AIRPORT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 70,286.00 87,017.80
720 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TRUST 84,824.57 120,938.17
26 CITY OF OAKDALE

TREASURERS REPORT
JANUARY 31 2025
All Funds January 2024 January 2025
722 SIERRA POINT PLAN (71,155.26) (71,155.26)
740 BRIDLE RIDGE S. TRAIL DEP 1,172,132.50 1,198,545.53 741 CRANE/PATTERSON SIGNAL 214,660.53 219,497.73
742 ANIMAL CONTROL TRUST 74,635.80 65,593.65
744 SENIOR CENTER TRUST 12,330.01 30,530.01
745 POLICE RANGE TRUST 22,438.22 31,246.42
746 SENIOR OUTREACH TRUST 62,841.03 56,460.99
747 POLICE EQUESTRIAN UNIT 1,011.78 1,011.78
769 SENIOR HOUSING FUND 21,635.58 22,123.14
790 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2003-2 224,852.66 226,045.03
791 BRIDLE RIDGE CFD 2004-1 79,321.55 76,474.05
792 BRIDLERIDGE CFD 2005-1 167,570.09 169,910.94
799 REFUSE COLLECTION 278,442.45 293,657.34
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1,397,213.52 357,849.24
DEVELOPER IMPACT FEES 10,458,065.37 7,854,750.68
63,331,151.86 56,257,420.31
All Funds January 2024 January 2025
BREAK DOWN OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ***
363 RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY 1,035,176.60 98,013.83
460 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE 362,036.92 259,835.41
1,397,213.52 357,849.24
BREAKDOWN OF IMPACT FEES ***
343 SYSTEM DEV-PARKS 5,193,955.36 1,561,334.09
344 SYSTEM DEV-STREETS 557,185.44 977,547.63
349 SYSTEM DEV -STORM DRN 271,348.23 390,677.33
354 SYS DEV - ADMINISTRATION 185,609.63 228,527.90
355 SYSTEM DEV - FIRE (473,787.31) (370,805.10)
356 SYSTEM DEV - POLICE 102,036.30 187,247.86
357 SYSTEM DEV - GEN GOVT 436,485.67 231,325.54
623 SYSTEM DEV - SEWER 334,648.91 353,704.44
646 SYSTEM DEV - WATER 3,850,583.14 4,295,190.99
10,458,065.37 7,854,750.68

LOANS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
542 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 34,633.57 21,788.72
343 SYSTEM DEVELOP - PARKS 145,593.53 108,209.89
349 SYSTEM DEV STORM DRN-OLD 144,207.04 106,823.40
646 WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES 291,187.23 216,419.96
615,621.37 453,241.97
27 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 720
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT STATEMENT DATE: 1/31/25
280 N 3RD AVE PAGE: 1 OF 1
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
ECONOMY CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 720

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
Beginning Balance 1/01/25 7,539.26
Deposits / Misc Credits 3 2,946.39
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 7 2,254.54
** Ending Balance 1/31/25 8,231.11 **
Service Charge .00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/03 982.13 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
1/17 982.13 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
1/31 982.13 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/07 691.94 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/09 200.00 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/16 54.56 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/16 350.10 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/21 9.11 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/21 634.17 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
1/28 314.66 NAVIA BENEFIT SO/FLEXIBLE B
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
1/03 8,521.39 1/16 7,224.79 1/28 7,248.98
1/07 7,829.45 1/17 8,206.92 1/31 8,231.11
1/09 7,629.45 1/21 7,563.64
28 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 487
UTILITY ACCOUNT STATEMENT DATE: 1/31/25
280 N 3RD AVE PAGE: 1 OF 1
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
ECONOMY CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 487

UTILITY ACCOUNT
Beginning Balance 1/01/25 150,544.45
Deposits / Misc Credits 2 135,400.54
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 3 285,149.96
** Ending Balance 1/31/25 795.03 **
Service Charge .00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/10 534.06 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
1/21 134,866.48 CITY OF OAKDALE/ACH
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/15 150,000.00 TRANSFER DEBIT
Ref 1L0FXSL To *9479
1/24 149.96 Return ACH Originated Entry/Aileen Grims
1/29 135,000.00 TRANSFER DEBIT
Ref 24VVIWF To *9479
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
1/10 151,078.51 1/21 135,944.99 1/29 795.03
1/15 1,078.51 1/24 135,795.03
29 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 689
280 N 3RD AVE STATEMENT DATE: 1/31/25
OAKDALE CA 95361-3042 PAGE: 1 OF 2
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 866-844-7500
OAK TREE CHECKING-PUBLIC CITY OF OAKDALE Acct 689
Beginning Balance 1/01/25 3,291,844.13
Deposits / Misc Credits 10 3,791,515.86
Withdrawals / Misc Debits 12 2,343,082.63
** Ending Balance 1/31/25 4,740,277.36 **
Service Charge .00
Interest Paid Thru 1/31/25 14,792.35
Interest Paid Year To Date 14,792.35
Minimum Balance 2,714,208
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPOSITS/CREDITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/03 76,583.43 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/06 61,853.39 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/07 71,055.73 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/08 112,218.46 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/14 37,042.06 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/16 132,217.25 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/22 2,737,684.43 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/23 63,855.85 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/24 484,212.91 Trnsfr from Checking Acct Ending in 9479 1/31 14,792.35 INTEREST EARNED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/02 279,148.02 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/09 64,860.64 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/10 6,374.57 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/13 157,209.44 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/15 66,604.16 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/17 206,520.85 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/21 287,888.04 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/27 78,610.55 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
30 OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK

MAIN OFFICE/OAKDALE
125 N THIRD AVE
OAKDALE CA 95361
(209)848-2265
CITY OF OAKDALE ACCOUNT NUMBER: 689
STATEMENT DATE: 1/31/25
PAGE: 2 OF 2
WEB SITE: www.ovcb.com
www.escbank.com
TOLL FREE PHONE: 866-844-7500
- - ACCOUNT CONTINUED - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER WITHDRAWALS/DEBITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Deposits Withdrawals Activity Description
1/28 729,510.47 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/29 165,141.52 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/30 204,443.13 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
1/31 96,771.24 Trnsfr to Checking Acct Ending in 9479
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAILY BALANCE SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Balance Date Balance Date Balance
1/02 3,012,696.11 1/13 3,105,962.47 1/23 5,515,749.01
1/03 3,089,279.54 1/14 3,143,004.53 1/24 5,999,961.92
1/06 3,151,132.93 1/15 3,076,400.37 1/27 5,921,351.37
1/07 3,222,188.66 1/16 3,208,617.62 1/28 5,191,840.90
1/08 3,334,407.12 1/17 3,002,096.77 1/29 5,026,699.38
1/09 3,269,546.48 1/21 2,714,208.73 1/30 4,822,256.25
1/10 3,263,171.91 1/22 5,451,893.16 1/31 4,740,277.36
31 32

MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of Oakdale | Account # | As of January 31, 2025
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Custodian:

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Performance Review
Total Rate of Return** 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS Since Inception (05/01/14)
City of Oakdale 0.46% 1.01% 0.46% 4.56% 4.17% 1.63% 1.27% 1.53% 1.58% Benchmark Return 0.49% 0.80% 0.49% 3.56% 3.58% 1.20% 0.98% 1.32% 1.38% Secondary Benchmark Return 0.50% 0.83% 0.50% 3.72% 3.72% 1.30% 1.07% 1.42% 1.48% **Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index Secondary Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year AAA-A Corp/Govt Account Summary
Beg. Values as of
01/01/2025
End Values as of
01/31/2025
Market Value 42,961,716.30 43,160,213.83
Accrued Interest 0.00 0.00
Total Market Value 42,961,716.30 43,160,213.83
Income Earned 74,421.01 82,769.40
Cont/WD 0.00 0.00
Par 4,065,106.47 4,072,938.25
Book Value 43,660,678.93 43,743,448.33
Cost Value 43,660,678.93 43,743,448.33

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

INVESTMENT
POOL
99CAMBX$1 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 4,072,938.25 --

0.00%
43,743,448.33
43,743,448.33

10.60 0.00%
43,160,213.83

0.00 100.00%
(583,234.49)
NA/NA
NA 0.00
Total Investment
Pool 4,072,938.25 0.00%
43,743,448.33
43,743,448.33

10.60 0.00%
43,160,213.83

0.00 100.00%
(583,234.49)
NA/NA
NA 0.00
Total Portfolio 4,072,938.25 0.00%
43,743,448.33
43,743,448.33

10.60 0.00%
43,160,213.83

TRANSACTION LEDGER
Transaction Type Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 01/31/2025 99CAMBX$1 7,831.77 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 10.568 (82,769.40) 0.00 (82,769.40) 0.00
Total Purchase 7,831.77 (82,769.40) 0.00 (82,769.40) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 7,831.77 (82,769.40) 0.00 (82,769.40) 0.00 OTHER

TRANSACTIONS
Equity Dividend 01/31/2025 99CAMBX$1 0.00 CSJVRMA Investment Pool 82,769.40 0.00 82,769.40 0.00
Total Equity
Dividend 0.00 82,769.40 0.00 82,769.40 0.00

INCOME EARNED
Cusip Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income

INVESTMENT POOL
99CAMBX$1 CSJVRMA Investment Pool
4,072,938.25
43,660,678.93
82,769.40

0.00 43,743,448.33

0.00 82,769.40

0.00 0.00

0.00 82,769.40
82,769.40
Total Investment Pool 4,072,938.25
43,660,678.93
82,769.40

0.00 43,743,448.33

0.00 82,769.40

0.00 0.00

0.00 82,769.40 82,769.40
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 4,072,938.25
43,660,678.93
82,769.40

0.00 43,743,448.33

0.00 82,769.40

0.00 0.00

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. (“Chandler”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV).

To obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at www.chandlerasset.com.

Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.

Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.

Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN “AS IS” BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND

THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM.

NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS AND LICENSEE’S USE IS AT LICENSEE’S OWN RISK. ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a high rating by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 38 CONFIDENTIAL | 7
City of Oakdale | Account | As of January 31, 2025
Execution Time: 02/07/2025 09:10:34 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

BENCHMARK INDEX & DISCLOSURES
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency
Index
The ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.

ICE BofA 1-5 Year AAA-A Corp/Govt
The ICE BofA US Issuers 1-5 Year AAA-A US Corporate & Government Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the US domestic market, including US Treasury, US agency, foreign government, supranational, and corporate securities. Qualifying securities must be issued from US issuers and be rated AAA through A3 (based on an average of Moody's, S&P and Fitch). In addition, qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to final maturity at point of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for US Treasuries and $250 million for all other securities. 39 CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the Oakdale City Council Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
From: Amber Del Cielo, Management Analyst
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 20-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH
Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4
I. BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale provides a number of hangars, airplane tie downs, and land area for private hangars at the Oakdale Municipal Airport. The City leases these facilities and land areas to aircraft owners at various monthly rates based on type, size, and function.

On June 17, 2021, City Staff requested proposals (RFP) for Hangar L-4, a 5,400 square foot hangar. On August 2, 2021 the City received two proposals. One from the previous month-to-month tenant, Helius Aero, and one from Sean Carroll.

City Staff reviewed the proposals and considered the operations that each of the proponents would perform. On October 4, 2021, City Council awarded a lease agreement for General Aviation purposes to Sean Carroll Partnership.

In the lease agreement approved by City Council on October 4, 2021 to Sean Carroll Partnership, MH Properties (Helius), LLC was offered first right of refusal of neighboring hangars such as L-1, L-4 and the caretaker’s site, upon availability, to expand its’ operations. In concurrence with the Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination dated October 22, 2024, MH Properties, LLC (Helius) is requesting to exercise this right to lease L-4.

II. DISCUSSION
History and Experience
MH Properties, LLC is an aviation property management company owned by John L. Stonecipher since June 2010. Mr. Stonecipher has several hangars in Prescott, Sedona and Glendale, Arizona and is currently occupying Hangar L-2 in Oakdale on a month-to-month lease.

MH Properties sister company, HELIUS, LLC, will occupy Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-2 which is jointly owned by Mr. Stonecipher and his wife, AGENDA ITEM 9.6
40 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Award Hangar L-4 to MH Properties, LLC
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
Catherine Stonecipher. The Oakdale hangar will be the primary base of operations in California offering aviation services to Pacific Gas & Electric and Cal Fire amongst other California government/state agencies for the foreseeable future. Currently, they have 30 employees who work from the Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar. HELIUS is a firm believer in reinvesting into the communities that they serve and desire to grow their operations in partnership with the City of Oakdale.

Lease Terms
MH Properties lease terms include the following:
1) Term:
a) 20-Year Initial Term
b) Two, Five-Year Renewal Options
2) Lease Rate:
a) Year 1 at $1,651.50 per month
b) Annual CPI Increases, on February 1, every year throughout the term of the lease. In no event shall any single increase be more than 3% or negative. 3) Activity:
a) Specialized Aviation Service Operator (“SASO”)
i) Specialized Commercial Flying Services
ii) Flight Training
iii) Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance

41 CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Award Hangar L-4 to MH Properties, LLC
MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
III. FISCAL IMPACT
The Airport is an independently run Enterprise Account, all revenues and income are utilized for the operations, maintenance, and development of the Airport.

There is no impact to the City General Fund.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 20-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2025-__
Attachment B: Hangar L-4 Lease Agreement
EXHIBIT A: Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-4
EXHIBIT B: Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
EXHIBIT C: 2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
Attachment C: Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination letter for Hangar L-4 42 IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-__
“ATTACHMENT A”

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A 20-YEAR TERM LEASE AGREEMENT WITH MH PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR AIRPORT HANGAR L-4.

THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, Hangar L-4, is a 5,400 square foot hangar; and WHEREAS, MH Properties lease terms include the following: 20-year initial term, two, five-year renewal options, lease rate at $1,651.50 per month in year 1 and annual CPI increases beginning February 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 20-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4 on March 3, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF OAKDALE hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a 20-Year Term Lease Agreement with MH Properties, LLC, for Airport Hangar L-4.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF MARCH, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
43 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 1 of 30 ends

CITY OF OAKDALE

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

AIRPORT BUILDING & GROUND LEASE
THIS LEASE is made and entered into effective this 3rd day of March, 2025, by and between the CITY OF OAKDALE (“City” or “Lessor”), a municipal corporation of the State of California, and MH PROPERTIES, LLC (“Lessee”), a limited liability company registered to do business in the state of California with its principal offices in Ashland, Oregon.

RECITALS

1. The City owns certain real property located at the Oakdale Municipal Airport (“Airport”) in the County of Stanislaus, State of California.

2. The facility that Lessee desires to Lease from the City consists of real Property and is situated at the Oakdale Municipal Airport, in the City of Oakdale, County of Stanislaus, State of California, described and shown on “Exhibit A”, and is particularly identified as Hangar L-4, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Premises”).

3. Lessee wishes to lease the Premises for a period of TWENTY (20) years, the term to commence on the effective date of execution of this Lease, (the “Initial Term”). The Lessee shall have two (2) five (5) year options (each a “Renewal Term”). Lessee shall pay RENT to City, $1,651.50 per month for the Premises.

4. Lessee desires to Lease Premises at the Oakdale Municipal Airport in the following Specialized Aviation Service Operator (“SASO”) categories; Specialized Commercial Flying Services, Flight Training and Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance.

5. Lessee shall have the right to sublease a portion of the Premises for aeronautical uses or SASO as outlined in Section 3.01 USE OF LEASED PREMISES.

6. Lessee shall have a right to develop and utilize crew rest facilities including temporary living quarters for pilots and support personnel.

7. The Lessee shall become familiar with and submit to, Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport and the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport. (2020 44 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 2 of 30 ends

Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport) Exhibit C.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 1
LEASE, LEASED PREMISES, TERM AND TITLE TO IMPROVEMENTS.

Section 1.01 LEASE
City hereby Leases to Lessee, and Lessee Leases from City, the Premises as described herein upon the covenants, terms, and conditions hereinafter set forth.

Section 1.02 LEASED PREMISES
The Leased Premises consists of the real property situated in the City of Oakdale, County of Stanislaus, State of California, more particularly described and shown on Exhibit “A”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 1.03 TERM OF LEASE
City Leases to Lessee the Premises for a period of FIVE (5) years, the term to commence on the effective date of execution of this Lease, (the “Initial Term”). The Lessee shall have two (2) five (5) year options (each a “Renewal Term”) to extend the term of this Lease for the Premises with the same terms and conditions set forth on this Lease. At the end of this agreement, Lessee may Lease the Premises on a month-to-month basis with the same terms and conditions set forth on this Lease.

Section 1.04 TITLE TO IMPROVEMENTS
During the term of this Lease, except as otherwise provided for herein, title to any and all Leasehold Improvements (excluding any personal property or trade fixtures) currently owned, and/or to be placed on the Premises by Lessee (collectively, “Improvements”) shall be vested in Lessee until termination of this Lease.

Section 1.05 REMOVAL, OWNERSHIP OR REVERSION OF IMPROVEMENTS AT

TERMINATION
Within sixty (60) days following the termination of this Lease, Lessee shall remove all of its personal property, and trade fixtures from the Premises and restore the city property to the same 45 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 3 of 30 ends

condition as before the effective date of this Lease. If Lessee’s personal property or trade fixtures are not removed by Lessee within sixty (60) days after the termination of the Lease, then such personal property, or trade fixtures shall, without compensation to Lessee, become City’s property, free and clear of all claims or against them by Lessee or any third person.

Also, upon termination of this Lease, the Improvements made during the term of this agreement shall remain on the property and become the property of the Lessor, at Lessor’s option.

Lessor may require Lessee to remove said Improvements within ninety (90) days of the termination of this Lease, in the event Lessee fails to remove the Improvements, the City may cause said Improvements to be removed and the cost thereof chargeable to Lessee.

ARTICLE 2

RENT, FEES & OTHER CHARGES
Section 2.01 RENT, FEES AND INVESTMENTS
a. Lessee shall pay RENT to City, $1,651.50 per month for the Premises; without deduction or offset, except as otherwise provided in this Lease. The Premises is subject to a Periodic Adjustment of Annual Rent, as hereinafter provided. The first payment of Rent shall be payable on the commencement of the Term of this Lease. The Fixed Rent for any partial month shall be pro-rated based on the actual number of days in such partial month.
b. Lessee shall pay to City an Airport fuel flowage FEE of $0.08 per gallon, for all Jet A fuel it pumps into its aircraft on the Airport grounds. The Airport fuel flowage FEE shall be paid with the monthly rent payment with a copy of the Lessees fuel log. (Not submitted by proponent in RFP, for discussion along with or in place of Jet-A development).

Section 2.02 PERIODIC ADJUSTMENT OF ANNUAL RENT
a. CPI Adjustment
(1) On February 1, 2026, and every year thereafter on February 1 throughout the term of this Lease (each, an “Adjustment Date”), the Rent shall be adjusted to an amount equal to the product obtained when the sum of the Fixed Rent payable during the Initial Term is multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the “Comparison Index” (as hereinafter defined), and the denominator of which is the “Beginning Index” (as hereinafter defined); provided, however, that in 46 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 4 of 30 ends

no event shall any single increase be more than three percent (3%) or negative. For the purpose of this Section 2.02, the following terms shall be defined as noted below:
(2) Index - The “Index” for computing the increases shall be the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose Metropolitan Area for All Urban Consumers (CPIU), All Items (1982-84 = 100), published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the event that the Index shall ever be converted to a different standard reference base or otherwise be revised, a determination of subsequent increases to the Fixed Rent shall be made with the use of such conversion factor, formula or table for converting the Index as may be published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the event the Index shall cease to be published, the index designated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as replacing the Index, or the most comparable substitute if said Bureau fails to designate a replacement, shall be used thereafter. (3) Beginning Index - The “Beginning Index” shall be defined as the Index published for the month in which this Lease becomes effective. (4) Comparison Index - The “Comparison Index” shall be defined as the Index published for the month prior to the date this Lease becomes effective in the year in which the applicable Adjustment Date occurs.
b. Market Adjustment
(1) At each renewal Term, the Lessee or Lessor may, upon written request and by mutual agreement, request that the rental rate be reviewed using the procedure employed by the City on previous market rate surveys and adjusted accordingly. The entire cost of such survey shall be paid by the party who most benefits by the results.

Section 2.03 PAYMENT
The Fixed Rent and any other sums payable to the City hereunder, shall be paid to City at the City’s address set forth hereinafter, or at such address as City may, from time to time designate by written notice to Lessee in accordance with the provisions hereof.

Section 2.04 LATE CHARGES
Lessee acknowledges that late payment of rent by Lessee to City will cause City to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the exact amount of such costs being extremely difficult and impracticable to fix. Such costs include, without limitations, processing and accounting charges, and late charges that may be imposed on City by the terms of any encumbrance and note secured by any encumbrance covering the Premises. Therefore, if any installment of rent due from Lessee is not received 47 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 5 of 30 ends

by 5:00 PM on the 10th day of each month, Lessee shall pay to City an additional sum of five percent (5%) of the overdue rent as a late charge. The parties agree that this late charge represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the costs that City will incur by reason of late payment by Lessee. Acceptance of any late charge shall not constitute a waiver of Lessee's default with respect to the overdue amount, nor prevent City from exercising any of the other rights and remedies available to City.

Section 2.05 DEPOSIT FOR REMOVAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY, TRADE FIXTURES, AND

BUILDINGS
Lessee acknowledges that the removal of personal property and trade fixtures is an expense that should be borne by the Lessee and the City will incur costs if the requirements of Section 1.05 (a) of this Lease agreement have not been met. Therefore, Lessee shall deposit $1,651.50 with the City as a security deposit and the Lessee shall quitclaim to City any and all rights, interests and claims to the deposit, personal property and trade fixtures if Section 1.05 has not been met.

Section 2.06 HOLD OVER
In the event Lessee remains in possession of the premises after the termination of the lease, Lessee at the option of Lessor, shall be determined to occupy the demised premises as a tenant from month-to-month, at a monthly rental equal to 150% of the sum of the last monthly installment of Fixed Rent payable during the last month of the term, subject to all of the other terms of the Lease.

ARTICLE 3

STANDARDS OF OPERATION
Section 3.01 USE OF LEASED PREMISES
a. Lessee shall utilize the Premises and Improvements constructed thereon for the Permitted Uses, which includes the following Specialized Aviation Service Operator (“SASO”) categories:
(1) Specialized Commercial Flying Services; and
(2) Flight Training; and
(3) Aircraft Airframe and Engine Repair and Maintenance. b. At no additional charge, Lessee shall have the right of access to, and use of all public facilities designated at the Airport for common use such as aviation operational areas, navigational aids, UNICOM communications, and accommodations in operation, landings, and takeoff of aircraft.

Lessee’s rights shall include the rights to land, take off, tow, load, or unload aircraft. 48 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 6 of 30 ends

c. Lessee shall have the right to sublease any portion of the Premises for the uses listed in Section

3.01 (a) above, or any SASO listed in the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at the Oakdale Municipal Airport, with City's written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided however, that the term of any sublease shall not extend beyond the term of this Lease. Any and all subleases shall be expressly made subject to all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease.
d. Lessee may provide aeronautical services for aircraft, passengers, and crew not limited to fueling, hangaring, tie-down and parking, aircraft rental, aircraft maintenance, flight instruction, and similar services.
e. Lessee shall have a right to store items related to ancillary or incidental uses that do not affect the hangars' primary use. Storage of materials related to an aeronautical activity, e.g., balloon and skydiving equipment, office equipment, teaching tools, fuel storage, fueling, refueling equipment, crew rest facilities including temporary living quarters for pilots and support personnel. f. Lessee may amend subsection (a) of this section only by written agreement from the City.

Section 3.02 LIMITATIONS ON USE
Lessee's use of the Premises shall be in accordance with the following:
a. Lessee shall comply with all laws concerning the Premises or Lessee's use of the Premises, including, without limitation, the obligation at Lessee's cost to alter, maintain, or restore the Premises, or construct Improvements in or to the Premises, in compliance and conformity with all laws and government requirements relating to the condition, use, or occupancy of the Premises during the term, whether foreseen or unforeseen, regardless of the cost, and regardless of when during the term the work is required;
b. Lessee shall not use the Premises in any manner which will constitute waste, nuisance, or unreasonable annoyance (including, without limitation, the use of loudspeakers or sound or light apparatus that can be heard or seen outside the Premises) to owners or occupants of adjacent properties;
c. Lessee shall not use the Premises for residential purposes, nor the preparation, manufacture, or mixing of anything that might emit any odor or objectionable noises or lights onto adjacent properties;
d. Lessee shall not use or allow the Premises to be used for any immoral or unlawful purposes; and
49 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 7 of 30 ends

e. Lessee shall not cause or permit any other act or thing, which may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any other Lessee at the Oakdale Municipal Airport; and f. Lessee shall become familiar with, and submit to, Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport and the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, City, and not Lessee, shall be solely responsible for making any alterations, modifications or upgrades to the Premises which are required under any laws or government requirements and do not relate to (a) Lessee’s specific use of the Premises, or (b) any alterations made to the Premises by Lessee.

Section 3.03 ABATEMENT OF NOISE
Lessee shall make an effort to aid in the mitigation of noise complaints and help foster good public relations by requesting Aircraft operators to adhere to any noise abatement procedures now in existence or which may be subsequently adopted by the City Council and/or promulgated by the Airport Manager. Procedures for prolonged engine maintenance tests and pilot training shall be set forth by separate letter between the Lessee and the Airport Manager, which can be amended from time to time.

Lessee shall conduct its operations on the Premises in such manner as will reduce to the minimum that is reasonably practical, considering the nature and extent of Lessee's operations, the emanation from the Premises and Airport Property; noise, dust, vibration, movement of air fumes and odors so as not to interfere unreasonably with the adjoining aircraft hangars, its occupants and surrounding properties.

Section 3.04 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED
On or before the 5th day of January of each calendar year during the term of this Lease, or while Lessee is holding over in possession of the Premises, Lessee shall provide, addresses of the owners, and the make, model and aircraft registration number of all aircraft which were using the Premises as a base on the 1st day of January of said calendar year. It is understood and agreed that the City is required to provide this information to the Stanislaus County Assessor in accordance with Section 441 (d) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to be used to value the possessory interest where an aircraft is stored.
50 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 8 of 30 ends

Section 3.05 AIRPORT AIRSHOWS AND STATIC DISPLAY EVENTS Lessee is hereby notified that an airshow, appreciation day, or similar events may be conducted at the Airport which may cause an inconvenience to Lessee. During the day or days of these events, Lessee or their customers may have limited aircraft access to the airport. If so, arrangements must be made to relocate or operate aircraft if Lessee wishes to operate aircraft during those times.

ARTICLE 4

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Section 4.01 REQUIREMENT OF CITY'S WRITTEN APPROVAL
No Improvements, including signage and landscaping, shall be erected or placed on the Premises and no alterations will be made in the Improvements and facilities constructed on the Premises without the prior written approval of City and in compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code. The Airport Manager shall be the initial contact of any proposed Improvements.

Section 4.02 PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PLANS
Lessee shall, at Lessee's own cost and expense, engage a licensed engineer and/or contractor to prepare plans and specifications for the Improvementsrequiring the City’s consent as provided in Section

4.01 above, and shall, if required, submit the plans and specifications to City for approval.

Section 4.03 ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED CONTRACTORS All work required in the construction of the Improvements referred to in Section 4.01 above, or any subsequent Improvements, shall be performed only by competent contractors duly and currently licensed under the laws of the State of California and shall be performed pursuant to written contracts between Lessee and with those contractors in conformance with state prevailing wage law, if applicable, and in procession of a City of Oakdale Business License.

Section 4.04 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND STANDARDS
a. The Improvements as described in Section 4.01 shall be constructed, and all work on the Premises shall be performed in accordance with all valid laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, and orders of all federal, state, county, city, or local governmental agencies or entities having jurisdiction over the Premises. All work performed on the Premises 51 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 9 of 30 ends

pursuant to this Lease, or authorized by this Lease, shall be done in a good workmanlike manner and only with materials of good quality and high standard. b. Lessee, for itself, its heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Premises for a purpose for which a DOT program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, Lessee shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Regulations, DOT, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation-Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said regulations may be amended.
c. Lessee and sub-Lessee(s) shall have a valid City Business License while operating a business at the airport.

Section 4.05 SIGNS
Lessee may erect signs as allowed by the City’s Municipal Code, and Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, and any subsequent amendments thereto.

ARTICLE 5
LESSEE’S ENCUMBRANCES
Section 5.01 LESSEE'S RIGHT TO ENCUMBER
Lessee may encumber Lessee's interest in the Premises and in any Improvements Lessee places thereon by mortgage, deed of trust, or other instrument. In such event, for the trustee, mortgagee or beneficiary in said instrument, or payee in the note or other obligation secured by any such instrument, Lessee shall deliver to City written notice showing:
a. The amount of the obligation secured by such instrument and the date of maturity or maturities thereof; and
b. The name and post office address of such mortgagee, beneficiary, payee or trustee.

Upon delivery of such notice, City shall thereafter serve on such mortgagee, beneficiary, payee or trustee, by registered or certified mail at the address given, or at any subsequent address thereafter given, a copy 52 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 10 of 30 ends

of every notice thereafter served by City upon Lessee under the terms of this Lease, during the existence of such mortgage, deed of trust or instrument.

The City agrees that the name of the mortgagee may be added to the “Loss Payable Endorsement” of any and all insurance policies required to be carried by Lessee.

All liens and encumbrances are subordinate to the City’s ownership interests.

Section 5.02 NOTICE OF LOAN DEFAULT
In the event that Lessee defaults in the performance of any covenant or provision hereof to be performed by Lessee during the existence of any such mortgage, deed of trust or instrument as provided in Section 5.01, the beneficiary, mortgagee, payee or trustee named in any such notice, or their nominee, shall have the right, but not the obligation, within the time provided in this Lease, plus an additional thirty (30) days, to perform and comply with all the covenants and provisions of this Lease to be performed by Lessee and to make all payments required of Lessee by this Lease and, by so doing, to thus cure and remove any such default. The City shall be named as the first claimant and retain the first right of refusal in the event of a loan default.

Section 5.03 RIGHTS OF LENDER TO CURE DEFAULTS
If the nature of any default by Lessee is such that it cannot be cured within such additional thirty (30) days as provided in Section 5.02, the beneficiary, mortgagee, payee, or trustee shall be deemed to have cured such default if it, or its nominee, shall, within the thirty (30) day period, commence performance and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

Section 5.04 PURCHASER IN FORECLOSURE TO BE DEEMED LESSEE If there is a foreclosure of any lien secured by any mortgage, deed of trust or other similar instrument on the Improvements to the Premises, the purchaser in foreclosure shall be deemed to be the Lessee hereunder for all purposes, the same as though such Purchaser were the original Lessee, hereunder, and in no event shall such Purchaser work a merger.

ARTICLE 6

MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Section 6.01 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS
At all times during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall, at Lessee's own cost and expense, keep and maintain the Premises and all Improvements, landscaping, fixtures, equipment, including Premises 53 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 11 of 30 ends

parking area, and Premises hangar apron, which may now or hereafter exist on the Premises, in good order and repair and in a safe and clean condition consistent with the highest of business practices. Lessee will be responsible for all repair costs. Lessee hereby waives the benefits of sections 1932, 1941, and 1942 of the California Civil Code and all rights to make repairs at the expense of City, as provided therein. If after thirty (30) days' written notice from City, Lessee fails to maintain, repair, or keep clean any part of the Premises or any Improvements, landscaping, fixtures, or equipment thereon, City or their designee may, without obligation, enter upon the Premises and perform such maintenance, repair, or clean-up and Lessee agrees to pay the costs thereof to City upon demand within thirty (30) days. Any unpaid sums under this Section 6.01 will bear interest at the prevailing statutory interest rate until paid in full. If Lessee is in arrears in any such payment, it shall be in default of this Lease.

At all times during the term of this Lease, the City shall maintain, repair and replace, at its sole cost and expense, the common areas of the Airport in good order and repair and in a safe and clean condition.

Section 6.02 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
As used in this Lease, the term "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any substance or material which has been determined by any state, federal or local governmental agency to be capable of posing risk of injury to health, safety, and property, including petroleum, petroleum products or by-products, and including but not limited to all those materials and substances designated as hazardous or toxic presently or in the future by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Water Resource Control Board, the U.S. Department of Labor, the California Department of Industrial Relations, the California Department of Health Services, the California Health and Welfare Agency in connection with the Safe Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S.

Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any other governmental agency now or hereafter authorized to regulate materials and substances defined as "Toxic Materials" in section 66680 through 66685 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 4, Chapter 30, as the same shall be amended from time to time.

No goods, merchandise or material shall be kept, stored or sold on the Premises which are in anyway explosive or hazardous, except as provided in this Lease. No offensive or dangerous trade, business or occupation shall be carried on therein or thereon (excluding the Permitted Uses), and nothing shall be done on the Premises other than as is provided for in Article 3 of this Lease which will increase the rate of or suspend the insurance upon the structures hereby assigned to Lessee or 54 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 12 of 30 ends

upon adjacent City buildings or structures, and no machinery or apparatus shall be used or operated on the Premises which will in any way injure Premises or adjacent buildings without prior approval of the Airport Manager. Hazardous materials, other than those used during standard operations listed in Article 3, will be notified to the Airport Manager. However, nothing shall preclude Lessee from bringing, keeping or using machinery necessary or customary in carrying out the Permitted Uses. In the event the Permitted Uses include the keeping or storage of flammable or explosive substances, such substances shall be stored in closed containers, and shall be stored, used or dispensed in the manner prescribed by the regulations of the City of Oakdale, and/or other public body having authority in the matter, and in any event, in the safest possible manner. From time to time, the Airport Manager will inspect the Premises for material safety.

In conducting its operations on the Oakdale Municipal Airport, Lessee shall abide and be bound by all of the following requirements:
a. Lessee shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, requirements, and policies now or hereinafter in effect relating to Hazardous Materials and environmental conditions on, under or about the Oakdale Municipal Airport including, but not limited to soil, air, stormwater, and groundwater conditions, and shall not contaminate the Oakdale Municipal Airport or the subsurface with any Hazardous Material. b. Lessee shall restrict the use of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premisesto those kinds of materials that would be normally expected in conducting the activities permitted under this Lease in a safe and prudent manner. Disposal of any Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises is strictly prohibited.
c. Lessee shall be solely and fully responsible for the reporting of accidental Hazardous Material releases to the appropriate public agencies including the Airport Manager, when such releases are caused by or resulting from Lessee's activities at the Airport. Lessee shall immediately notify City of any release of Hazardous Materials caused by or result from Lessee's activities on the Airport, whether or not the release is in quantities that would otherwise be reportable to a public agency, if such release did, or has the potential to contaminate soil or enter the City’s sanitary or storm drain sewer system. d. Lessee shall be solely and fully responsible and liable for any Hazardous Materials Lessee causes or permits (if within the Lessee’s control) to be released at the Airport, or to enter the City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, groundwater or any Improvements. Lessee shall take all necessary precautions to prevent any Hazardous Materials from entering into the City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, 55 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 13 of 30 ends

groundwater or any Improvements, or from otherwise being released on Airport. If at any time a release of Hazardous Materials is discovered on the Premises, the Airport, City's sewerage or storm drainage system, soil, air, groundwater or any Improvements, which was caused or permitted by Lessee, Lessee's officers, agents, employees, contractors, permittees or invitees or there is the danger of such release of Hazardous Materials due to Lessee’s activities on the Premises, Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall remove, or be caused to remove, to the extent necessary to allow for uses typically permitted at an airport, such Hazardous Materials from the Airport or the groundwater underlying the Airport, or the City's soil, air, storm drainage and sewerage system, in accordance with requirements of all appropriate governmental authorities including any subsequent fines or penalties resulting from Lessee’s actions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, City hereby agrees that Lessee shall not responsible or liable for any remediation, clean-up or other costsincurred to remedy any Hazardous Materials (a) existing at the Premises prior to the effective date of this Lease except what was caused by Lessee during the previous Lease, or (b) not caused or permitted by Lessee, Lessee's officers, agents, employees, contractors, permittees or invitees.

ARTICLE 7

TAXES AND UTILITIES
Section 7.01 TAXES
During the term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay or cause to be paid, prior to delinquency, any and all taxes, including possessory interest taxes and any assessments, levied or assessed on the Premises, on all possessory interests hereunder or in the Premises, and on any Improvements, fixtures, and equipment now or hereafter existing on the Premises and on any personal property situated in, on, or about the Premises, or in, on, or about any buildings or Improvements on the Leased Premises.

It is understood, however, that Lessee may pay any such taxes and assessments under protest without liability, cost, or expense to City, and in good faith contest the validity or amount thereof.

Section 7.02 UTILITIES, TRASH AND REFUSE
Lessee shall pay or cause to be paid, and hold City free and harmless from all charges for utilities and services, including but not limited to gas, heat, electricity, internet, and telephone service, as 56 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 14 of 30 ends

supplied to the Premises, including installation and connection of such services, and for the removal of garbage and rubbish from the Premises during the term of this Lease. During the term of this Lease, City agrees to make available any utilities, including water and sewer, which may exist adjacent to the Premises at the time of execution of this Lease or which may become available in the future.

Connection and service costs for City utilities shall be governed by the Municipal Code, including any amendments to it.

Lessee shall arrange for the quick and efficient collection and disposal of refuse from the Premises in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances. Lessee shall not allow clippings, trimmings, cans, cartons, barrels, used equipment, scrap or other debris to collect in any way on or about the Premises; provided, however, that same may be stored in a suitable screened and protected enclosure acceptable to City pending collection and removal as long as the storage does not generate odors, attract rodents or insects, or become an attractive nuisance, or offensive in any manner. Upon failure of Lessee to comply with the provisions of this Section, the City may, upon no less than thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, enter upon the Premises and perform such clean-up or removal, and Lessee agrees to pay the costs thereof to City upon demand within 30 days. If Lessee is in arrears in any such payment, it shall be in default of this Lease.

Section 7.03 UTILITY EASEMENTS
City reserves the right to grant nonexclusive underground utility easements to others under, through, across or on the Premises in locations that will not unreasonably interfere with Lessee's use of the Premises. If the installation or maintenance of utility lines in such easements causes any damage to facilities upon the Premises, including but not limited to pavement, curbs and sidewalks, the facilities will be repaired by City at its expense if not so repaired by the party installing or maintaining the line.

ARTICLE 8

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
Section 8.01 HOLD HARMLESS
Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, directors, employees, volunteers, and agents harmless from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, cost, suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description, including reasonable attorney's fees, for or on account of damage to property or injury to persons arising from anything done or performed, or omitted to be done or performed, on the Premises by Lessee, or any activity carried on by Lessee, Lessee’s officers, 57 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 15 of 30 ends

directors, employees, agents, sublessees, or for anyone for whom Lessee has custody and control in connection with the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Lessee be obligated to indemnify, defend or hold the City, its officials, directors, employees, volunteers, and agents harmless from their negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct. Approval of the insurance required by this Lease does not relieve the Lessee from liability under this hold harmless clause.

Section 8.02 INSURANCE
Lessee and shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Lease insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from, or in connection with the Lessee’s operation, use of the Premises or this Lease, which shall meet the minimum standards set forth below.

The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Lessee. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (“occurrence” form CG 00 01).
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent).
(3) Property insurance against all risks of loss to any Lessee Improvements or betterments, excluding flood and earthquake.
(4) Pollution Liability covering all activities contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.”
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Lessee shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Coverage shall include but not be limited to:
blanket contractual; operations completed, and broad form property damage.
58 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 16 of 30 ends

(2) Business Automobile Liability: Coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per accident. (3) Property Insurance: Full replacement cost with no coinsurance penalty provision.
(4) Pollution Liability: Coverage shall be provided for liability arising out of sudden, accidental and gradual pollution and remediation. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim. All activities contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.” The policy shall provide coverage for the hauling of waste from the site to the final disposal location, including non-owned disposal sites. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) must be declared to and approved by the City’s Risk Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability policy and automobile liability policy shall contain and be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of Premises owned, occupied or used by the Lessee. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. General liability additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office forms CG 20 10 and CG 20 37.
(2) The Lessee’s insurance coverage shall allow and be endorsed primary insurance as respects the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Lessee’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) The general liability and automobile liability policies shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
59 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 17 of 30 ends

(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Oakdale, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (4) Coverage shall state that the Lessee’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Oakdale.

If a carrier will not provide the required notice of cancellation or policy modification, the Lessee shall provide written notice to the City of cancellation or policy modification no later than five (5) business days before cancellation or policy modification.
e. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII, licensed to do business in California.
f. Verification of Coverage
Lessee shall furnish a copy of these requirements to Lessee’s insurance agent. The agent shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with Certificate(s) of Insurance and amendatory endorsements evidencing coverage required by this clause. By sending the requisite documents, the agent is certifying the Lessee and maintains the appropriate coverage. All documents are to be received and approved by the City before Lessee takes possession, or begins work on the Premises. Lessee, or its insurance agent, shall furnish City with evidence of insurance thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the current certificate(s).

ARTICLE 9

DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
Section 9.01 EVENTS OF DEFAULT BY LESSEE
This Lease shall be subject to termination by City in the event of any one or more of the following events of default by Lessee:
60 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 18 of 30 ends

a. Lessee's failure to pay the rent or any other monetary obligation herein provided at the time fixed for payment following a ten (10) day written notice that the same is due; b. Lessee’s failure to maintain the Premises pursuant to Section 6.01 of this Lease. c. Lessee’s failure to pay any taxes, including possessory interest taxes or assessments agreed to be paid by Lessee in accordance with the terms of Section 7.01 of this Lease. d. Lessee's failure after thirty (30) days' written notice from City to keep, perform or observe any term, covenant or condition of this Lease to be kept, performed or observed by Lessee.
e. Lessee's failure to replace any Improvements on the Premises which have been destroyed by fire, explosion, flood, windstorm or other calamity within six (6) months after the date of such destruction; provided, however, if such Improvements may take longer that six (6) months to repair, Lessee shall have the right, within ninety (90) days after the date of such casualty, to terminate this Lease upon written notice to the City and deliver to the City all insurance proceeds received by Lessee and applicable to the Improvements to be retained by the City under the terms of this Lease. f. Lessee's filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or the assignment of all or substantially all of Lessee's assets for the benefit of Lessee's creditors or the institution of proceedings in bankruptcy against Lessee or the appointment of a receiver of the assets of Lessee; provided, however, that if any such proceedings or appointments are involuntary, then they shall not be considered an event of default by Lessee unless Lessee fails to procure a dismissal thereof within sixty (60) days after the institution of involuntary bankruptcy proceedings or the appointment of a receiver. g. Lessee's failure to permit inspection of the Premises, after 24-hours’ written notice thereof, or immediately in the event of an emergency or other urgent condition. h. Lessee's failure to comply with, after written notice is received by Lessee, Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport and the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Section 9.02 IMMEDIATE RIGHT OF RE-ENTRY UPON DEFAULT
Upon the occurrence of an "event of default by Lessee," as identified in Section 9.01, City, in addition to any other rights or remedies it may have, shall have the immediate right of re-entry and may remove or cause to be removed all persons and property from the Premises; such property may be removed and stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost of, and for the account of, Lessee. 61 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 19 of 30 ends

Should City elect to re-enter as provided herein, or should it take possession pursuant to legal proceedings or any notice provided for by law, it may terminate this Lease and thereafter relet the Premises and Improvements thereon or any part thereof for such term or terms (which may extend beyond the term of this Lease) and such rental or re-rental and upon such other terms and conditions as City in it sole discretion may deem advisable, with the right to make alterations and repairs to Premises and Improvements.

Section 9.03 LIENS
Lessee shall keep the Premises and all Improvements thereon free from any and all liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished, or obligation incurred (except as provided in Section

5.01 hereof) by Lessee and to pay to City, upon demand, the cost of discharging such liens (other than those which may have been created pursuant to Section 5.01 hereof) with interest at the prevailing statutory rate from the date of such discharge, together with reasonable attorneys' fees in connection with the settlement, trial, or appeal of any such lien matter.

Section 9.04 WAIVER OF DEFAULTS
No provision of this Lease may be waived except by the written consent of City. Any waiver (whether express or inadvertent) by City of any breach by Lessee of any of the provisions of this Lease shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach by Lessee of either the same or a different provision of this Lease. Forbearance or indulgence by City, in any regard, shall not constitute a waiver of any requirement under this Lease, and City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it in equity or by law, despite such forbearance or indulgence.

ARTICLE 10

AIRPORT PLANNING & GRANT AGREEMENT COVENANTS
Section 10.01 AIRPORT PLANS
City has adopted a Terminal Area Development Plan indicating the general layout of the Airport. City reserves the right to amend such plans or to adopt a new plan and makes no representation as to the location of any of the Improvements shown on existing or future Plans. City reserves the right to locate and relocate runways, taxiways, aprons, and other facilities owned and constructed by it as in its sole discretion shall be deemed proper by it without any liability, present or future, to Lessee. However, Lessee will be informed of such plans, especially those which would 62 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 20 of 30 ends

reasonably hinder Lessee’s ability to conduct business, and Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease if, in Lessee’s sole discretion, such plans would reasonably hinder Lessee’s ability to conduct its business on the Premises. No plan shall permanently hinder Lessee’s access or use of runways, taxiways aircraft movement areas, aprons, Leased facilities or adjacent parking lots.

Section 10.02 GRANT AGREEMENT COVENANTS
Lessee, its heirs, personal representatives, successors-in-interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, shall operate under the following conditions:
a. Lessee acknowledges that the City is subject to Federal Grant Agreement obligations (“Airport Assurances”) as a condition precedent to granting of funds for improvement of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, and accordingly agrees to, and agrees to be bound by, the Airport Assurances provided by the Federal Aviation Administration. Lessee shall comply with these Airport Assurances on file with the City and incorporated by reference.
b. Lessee shall not on the grounds of race, color or national origin discriminate or permit discrimination against any person or group of persons in any manner prohibited by Part 152 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.
c. Lessee shall comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, including Title III, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, codified at 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36.
d. Lessee shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or veteran’s status.

Lessee shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Lessee, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or veteran’s status.
e. Lessee will send each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice advising the labor union or worker’s representative of the Lessee’s commitments under this paragraph and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
63 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 21 of 30 ends

f. Lessee agrees that if facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Premises, Lessee shall comply with all other requirements imposed pursuant to 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation, and any amendments to the Regulations.
g. Lessee’s non-compliance with any Airport Assurance provisions shall constitute a material breach. In the event of a breach of any of the nondiscrimination covenants, (49 CFR Part 21) the City or the United States shall have the right to:
(1) terminate this Lease, or
(2) seek judicial enforcement of said covenants.

ARTICLE 11

NOTICES
Section 11.01 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Subject to Section 3.01 above, Lessee, at Lessee's own cost and expense, shall comply with all present and future statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of all governmental entities, both federal and state, and county or municipal, including those requiring capital Improvements to the Premises, relating to Lessee's use and occupancy of the Premises whether those statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements are now in force or are subsequently enacted. If any license, permit, or other governmental authorization is required for the lawful use or occupancy of Premises or any portion of the Premises, Lessee shall procure and maintain such license, permit, or other authorization throughout the term of this Lease. The judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or the admission by Lessee in a proceeding brought against Lessee by any government entity, that Lessee has violated any such statute, ordinance, regulation, or requirement shall be conclusive of that fact as between City and Lessee and shall constitute grounds for termination of this Lease by City after written notice received by Lessee.

Section 11.02 RESERVATION AS TO NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
City reserves the right during the term of this Lease, or any renewal or extension of it, to install air navigational aids, including lighting in, on, over, under, and across the Premises. In the exercise of any of its rights, City agrees to give Lessee no less than ninety (90) days' written notice of its intention to install such air navigational aids. If Lessee's enjoyment of the Premises under this Lease 64 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 22 of 30 ends

is substantially interfered with by any such installation, Lessee's rent shall be reduced in proportion to such interference.

Section 11.03 AIRSPACE EASEMENT, HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
City reserves an easement in the airspace above the surface of the Premises with the right on the part of the City or any Oakdale Municipal Airport user to allow or cause such noise, vibration, discomfort, inconvenience or interference with the use and enjoyment of the Premises that may be caused by reason of the operation of aircraft to and from the Airport. No building, structure or natural growth, otherwise permitted, shall exceed an elevation allowed according to Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 ‘SAFE, EFFICIENT USE, AND PRESERVATION OF THE NAVIGABLE AIRSPACE’ for obstruction clearance. City reserves the right to regulate the height of any and all buildings, structures, or other Improvements to be constructed or erected on the Premises, together with any and all-natural growth.

City shall have the right to enter and remove any building or part thereof, any structure or part thereof, or any improvement or part thereof, which has been constructed or erected without its written consent if in its opinion that building, structure or improvement, or part thereof is a hazard to air navigation. City shall have the right to enter the Premises and remove natural growth or any part thereof which does or may cause a hazard to air navigation. Lessee shall comply with filing requirements of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations when plans for any building or structure are sufficiently completed so as to show any elevations.

Section 11.04 INSPECTION AND NOTICE
City shall, upon twenty-four (24) hours’ verbal or written notice to Lessee, or immediately in the event of an emergency or other urgent condition, have the right to go upon and inspect the Premises and any and every structure or improvement erected or constructed, or in the course of being erected or constructed, repaired, added to, rebuilt, or restored thereon, and also to serve or to post and to keep posted thereon, or in any part thereof, any notices required by law.

Section 11.05 RIGHT TO AMEND
In the event that the Federal Aviation Administration requires modifications or changes in this Lease as a condition precedent to the granting of funds for the improvement of the Oakdale Municipal Airport or lands and Improvements, Lessee agrees to consent to such amendments, modifications, revisions, supplements, or deletions of any of the terms, conditions or requirements of this Lease as 65 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 23 of 30 ends

may be reasonably required to obtain such funds; provided, however, that in no event will Lessee be required, pursuant to this Section 11.05, to agree to an increase in the rentals provided for this Lease, to a change in the use to which Lessee has put the Premises, or to any provision which materially modifies Lessee’s obligations under this Lease.

Section 11.06 CONSENT NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD
Whenever consent is required under the terms of this Lease by either Lessee or City, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

Section 11.07 GOVERNING LAW
This Lease, and all matters relating to this Lease, shall be governed by the laws of the County of Stanislaus and the State of California, or other applicable and superseding federal law, in force at the time any need for interpretation of this Lease or any decision or holding concerning this Lease arises.

Section 11.08 ATTORNEY'S FEES
In the event that either party shall commence any legal action or proceedings against the other party concerning the Premises, this Lease, or the rights and duties of either in relation to the Lease, the party prevailing in that action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any other relief that may be granted in the litigation, all fees, expenses, costs, court costs and a reasonable sum as and for that party's attorneys' fees that shall be determined by the court in that litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose. Such recovery shall include court costs and attorneys' fees on appeal, if any. In the event of a proceeding in which City is the prevailing party, City shall be entitled to attorneys' fees in an amount or sum not less than the prevailing market rate for attorneys with experience comparable to that of the City's attorneys. The court will determine who is the "prevailing party," whether or not the suit proceeds to final judgment. However, if an action is voluntarily dismissed, or dismissed pursuant to a settlement of the case, neither party shall be entitled to recover its attorneys' fees. Lessee hereby waives the benefit of the notice provisions of section 1161 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Any legal action or proceedings shall be filed in the County of Stanislaus.
66 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 24 of 30 ends

Section 11.09 EMINENT DOMAIN
City and Lessee agree that if eminent domain proceedings are undertaken by any governmental agency affecting the whole or a part of the Airport, which would adversely affect Lessee's interest hereby, Lessee shall be entitled to compensation consistent with current eminent domain appraisal procedures.

Section 11.10 INVALID PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY
If any term of this Lease is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such term shall not invalidate any other term of this Lease; provided, however, that the invalidity of any such term does not materially prejudice either City or Lessee in their respective rights and obligations contained in the valid terms of this Lease.

Section 11.11 MODIFICATIONS
City and Lessee agree that the terms of this Lease constitute the entire Lease between Lessee and City regarding the Premises. However, this Lease may be modified with the agreement of both parties pursuant to the procedures outlined in the City’s Purchasing Ordinance.

Section 11.12 LEASE IN MULTIPLE COPIES
This Lease is executed in multiple copies, and each executed copy shall be deemed an original.

Section 11.13 BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
The terms contained in this Lease shall, subject to the provisions as to assignment, apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of the Parties.

Section 11.14 NOTICE
Notice shall be effective from the date of mailing. Any and all notices to be given under this Lease, or otherwise, shall be sent via certified mail with postage prepaid to:

Lessor Lessee
Oakdale City Clerk MH Properties, LLC
280 North Third Ave. 6565 Crystal Lane
Oakdale, California 95361 Prescott, AZ 86301
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Lease have caused it to be executed by their officers thereunto duly authorized so to do this 3rd day of March 2025.

MH PROPERTIES, LLC
67 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 25 of 30 ends

Dated: _____________________ ________________________________________ John L. Stonecipher
Managing Member of MH Properties, LLC

CITY OF OAKDALE,
a municipal corporation of the State of California,
Dated: _____________________ _________________________________________ Bryan Whitemyer, City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________________
Tom P. Hallinan, City Attorney
Attachments:

Exhibit “A” Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar L-4
Exhibit “B” Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
Exhibit “C” 2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
68 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 26 of 30 ends

EXHIBIT “A”
OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT HANGAR L-4
69 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 27 of 30 ends

SHORT-TERM CREW QUARTERS RENDERING
70 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 28 of 30 ends

EXHIBIT “B”
Letter of Intent (Based Aircraft)
71 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 29 of 30 ends

72 “ATTACHMENT B”

Page 30 of 30 ends

EXHIBIT “C”
2020 Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport
73 OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (O27)
2020 OPERATING RULES, REGULATIONS

AND MINIMUM STANDARDS
FOR

USERS OF THE OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2020
ISSUED BY:

CITY OF OAKDALE

PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
455 SOUTH FIFTH AVENUE
OAKDALE CA 95361
209-845-3625
Exhibit "C"
74

Page 2 ends

CONTENTS
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7

1.1 Purpose............................................................................................................................. 7

1.2 Responsibilities................................................................................................................. 7 2 Aircraft Hangars.............................................................................................................. 7

2.1 City Hangar Swap List Administrative Policy.................................................................... 7

2.2 City Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy..................................................................... 8

2.3 Qualifying for City Hangar or Tie-Down ........................................................................... 9

2.4 Qualifying for Corporate Hangar...................................................................................... 9 3 General Provisions........................................................................................................ 10

3.1 Compliance..................................................................................................................... 10

3.2 City of Oakdale Staff – Actions to Safeguard the Public ................................................ 10

3.3 City of Oakdale Staff – Rules and Regulations............................................................... 10

3.4 Violation of Rules ........................................................................................................... 10 4 Special Provisions......................................................................................................... 10

4.1 Advertisements.............................................................................................................. 10

4.2 Airport Access................................................................................................................. 11

4.3 Airport Entry Points........................................................................................................ 11

4.4 Animals........................................................................................................................... 11

4.5 Cleaning/Washing of Aircraft......................................................................................... 11

4.6 Conduct of Business....................................................................................................... 11

4.7 Derelict Aircraft.............................................................................................................. 11

4.8 Entering Restricted Areas Prohibited............................................................................. 12

4.9 Equipment and Material Storage................................................................................... 12

4.10 Firearms...................................................................................................................... 12

4.11 Flammable Material Storage ...................................................................................... 12

4.12 Floor Care – Requirements......................................................................................... 13

4.13 Gate Control ............................................................................................................... 13

4.14 Garbage and Refuse.................................................................................................... 13 75

Page 3 ends

4.15 Lubricating Oils, Dopes, Paints and Thinners – Storage............................................. 13

4.16 Hours of Operation..................................................................................................... 13

4.17 Intoxicants and Drugs................................................................................................. 13

4.18 Loitering/Trespassing ................................................................................................. 14

4.19 Lost and Found Articles.............................................................................................. 14

4.20 Motorized Equipment – Operation Restrictions: ....................................................... 14

4.21 Noise........................................................................................................................... 14

4.22 Open-Flame Operations............................................................................................. 14

4.23 Parking of Vehicles...................................................................................................... 14

4.24 Smoking Prohibited .................................................................................................... 15

4.25 Soliciting...................................................................................................................... 15

4.26 Through the Fence Operations................................................................................... 15

4.27 Use of Roads and Walks – Use Restrictions: .............................................................. 15 5 Airport Operations ....................................................................................................... 16

5.1 Abandoned, Wrecked, Dismantled or Inoperative Vehicles.......................................... 16

5.2 Aerobatics Prohibited..................................................................................................... 16

5.3 Accident/Incident Reports............................................................................................. 16

5.4 Aircraft Equipment......................................................................................................... 17

5.5 Aircraft Parking............................................................................................................... 17

5.6 Aircraft Repairs............................................................................................................... 17

5.7 Aircraft – Full Control Required ..................................................................................... 18

5.8 Aircraft Operation Areas – Locations Where Engine Operations is Permitted ............. 18

5.9 Aircraft Engines – Starting and Running ........................................................................ 18

5.10 Aircraft Engines – Operation in Hangars Prohibited .................................................. 18

5.11 Conformity with Rules and Regulations..................................................................... 18

5.12 Damage to Airport Property....................................................................................... 19

5.13 Dangerous Cargo ........................................................................................................ 19

5.14 Denial of Departure or Landing Clearance ................................................................. 19

5.15 Disposition of Disabled Aircraft and Incomplete Repairs........................................... 19 76

Page 4 ends

5.16 Electrical Equipment................................................................................................... 19

5.17 Federal and State Air Traffic Rules............................................................................. 19

5.18 Fuel Sales.................................................................................................................... 20

5.19 Hangar Inspection....................................................................................................... 20

5.20 Incursion Prevention and Deviation Prevention ........................................................ 20

5.21 Intoxicants and Drug................................................................................................... 20

5.22 Liability Insurance Requirements............................................................................... 21

5.23 Maintenance Taxi and Run-Up ................................................................................... 21

5.24 Night Flying................................................................................................................. 21

5.25 Non-airworthy Aircraft ............................................................................................... 21

5.26 Painting....................................................................................................................... 21

5.27 Safe Handling of Aircraft............................................................................................. 22

5.28 Securing of Unattended Aircraft ................................................................................ 22

5.29 Storage and Repairs – Locations................................................................................. 22

5.30 Takeoffs and Landings................................................................................................ 22

5.31 Taxiing......................................................................................................................... 22

5.32 Taking Aircraft into Custody ....................................................................................... 22

5.33 Turns / Traffic Pattern / Traffic Altitudes................................................................... 23 6 Commercial Activities................................................................................................... 23

6.1 Advertisements.............................................................................................................. 23

6.2 Authorization.................................................................................................................. 23

6.3 Commercial Photography............................................................................................... 24

6.4 Aircraft Maintenance ..................................................................................................... 24

6.5 Services and Deliveries on City Operated Airport Aprons............................................. 24 7 Hangar, T-Hangar and Tiedown Area............................................................................. 24

7.1 Facilities Definitions....................................................................................................... 24

7.2 Specific Provisions.......................................................................................................... 25 8 Hangar Storage of Airworthy, Non-Airworthy And Aircraft Under Construction............. 27

8.1 Hangar Storage of Airworthy Aircraft ............................................................................ 27 77

Page 5 ends

8.2 Hangar Storage of Non-Airworthy Aircraft and Aircraft Under Construction ............... 27

8.3 Extensions for Non-Airworthy Aircraft........................................................................... 28 Fuel Servicing ...................................................................................................................... 28

8.4 Blocking of Control Devices – Prohibited....................................................................... 28

8.5 Fuel Spill Control – Clean up .......................................................................................... 28

8.6 Fuel Spill Notification ..................................................................................................... 28

8.7 Fueling Operations – Attendant Required When Passengers in Cabin.......................... 28

8.8 Fueling Operations – Location Restrictions ................................................................... 29

8.9 Fueling Operations – Operation of Electrical Apparatus Prohibited ............................. 29

8.10 Fueling Operations – Prohibited While Engine Running ............................................ 29

8.11 Fueling Operations – Required Equipment................................................................ 29

8.12 Fueling Operations – Static Spark Materials Prohibited ............................................ 29

8.13 Fueling Equipment...................................................................................................... 29

8.14 Grounding Requirements During Fueling Operations:............................................... 30

8.15 Starting of Engines Prohibited When Fuel on Ground ............................................... 30 9 Motor Vehicles/Equipment........................................................................................... 30

9.1 Aircraft Right-of-Way ..................................................................................................... 30

9.2 Common Carriers ........................................................................................................... 30

9.3 Ground Vehicle Operations on airport........................................................................... 30

9.4 Crossing Runways........................................................................................................... 30

9.5 Driving Privilege Revocable............................................................................................ 31

9.6 Emergency Vehicles ....................................................................................................... 31

9.7 Flashing Beacon Light/Flag............................................................................................. 31

9.8 License Requirements.................................................................................................... 31

9.9 Gate Access .................................................................................................................... 31

9.10 Radios Required.......................................................................................................... 31

9.11 Speed Limits: (Excluding emergency vehicles)........................................................... 32

9.12 Restricted Areas.......................................................................................................... 32

9.13 Security Motor Vehicles ............................................................................................. 32 78

Page 6 ends

9.14 Vehicle Condition/Repair: .......................................................................................... 32

9.15 Vehicles/Equipment Parking and Storage.................................................................. 32

9.16 Vehicle Inspection ...................................................................................................... 33

9.17 Vehicle Removal ......................................................................................................... 33 10 Appendix A – Definitions / Abbreviations...................................................................... 34 11 Oakdale Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standard Exhibits........................ 43 79

Page 7 ends

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, as outlined in this document, are designed to facilitate the safe and efficient operation by Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport and to govern the conduct of all operations by Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport. Consistent with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) advisory circulars 150/5190-6 and 150/5190-7, they are intended to be reasonable, non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory and therefore apply equally to everyone. Employees, guests, lessees, permittees, tenants, vendors, visitors, users (Users) shall at all times comply with federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations which are applicable to their operations. Users shall display to the City of Oakdale (City), upon request, any permit, license or other evidence of compliance with such law.

1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES
It shall be the responsibility of every User of the Oakdale Municipal Airport, including pilots and others, to become familiar with the provisions of these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards. These Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards may be amended by the City at its discretion from time-to-time as determined to be necessary.

Per City of Oakdale Resolution 2020-113 and these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards and any amendments thereto shall be in effect when administratively issued by the City of Oakdale. A copy will be maintained current to reflect any amendments and will be available in the Airport Manager’s office and on the Airport Website at www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-Airport. The Airport Manager will provide additional copies to any User who requests such a copy. 2 AIRCRAFT HANGARS

2.1 CITY HANGAR SWAP LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
A. It is permissible for Lessees to request to swap hangars. Lessees desiring to swap or exchange hangars must have accounts in good standing (including taxes). The City shall be notified in writing, as described below, explicitly stating the swap details prior to aircraft movement or to be placed on the Swap List.
a. To obtain a position on the Swap List a Lessee must make a written request to the Airport Manager, stating the general size of the hangar desired. The Lessee will be 80

Page 8 ends

placed on the Swap List with their letter or e-mail serving as the time stamp for the request. The letter or e-mail should contain the Lessee’s contact information, phone number and email address. The letter should also indicate the Lessees desired size of hangar. The Lessee should notify the City should contact information change.
b. When a hangar becomes available the first Swap List requestor will be contacted, by the Airport Manager via email and provided five (5) business days to respond.

If the requester declines, the subsequent Swap List requestor will be contacted until the Swap List is exhausted. If the requestor declines a hangar of the size requested, they will be dropped from the SWAP list. Should no Swap List Position Holder desire the available hangar the Hangar Wait List applicants, as detailed in Section 2.2, will be contacted.

2.2 CITY HANGAR WAIT LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
A. The Airport maintains a chronologically ordered Hangar Wait List (HWL) for individuals or entities desiring hangars.

B. The Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application (Exhibit-A) must be completed by the applicant and submitted to the City along with the Application Processing Fee in order to be a “active” Position Holder on the HWL.

C. Position Holders name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the application with earlier dates “higher up” the HWL.

D. When a hangar becomes available and after the Swap List is exhausted, the first Position Holder on the HWL, as posted on the Airport Website, will be contacted.

E. If the Position Holder declines to accept the available hangar or fails to respond to the City within five (5) business days, the individual’s status will be classified as “inactive” (i.e. indicated by their names being “grayed-out” on the online HWL). The next Position Holder will then be contacted. If the next Position Holder declines that position, the Position Holder becomes inactive as noted above. The process will continue until a Position Holder accepts an available hangar. Should all “active” Position Holders decline, the City may contact “inactive” status applicants at their discretion.

F. Due to historical high demand for hangar space, HWL Position Holders are best served by ensuring the Airport has current e-mail and telephone number(s).

G. At any time should an “inactive” applicant desire to restore their status to “active”, that applicantshould contact the City. An Application Processing Fee will be charged to restore the status to “active” and the applicants name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the new application.
81

Page 9 ends

H. Applicants are required to pay an annual Application Processing Fee in order to maintain status as a position on the HWL. An invoice will be generated annually by City of Oakdale Finance Department and mailed to the Position Holder. Failure to pay the annual Application Processing Fee in the time allotted will classify the Position Holder as “inactive”.

2.3 QUALIFYING FOR CITY HANGAR OR TIE-DOWN
A. Potential Lessees (“Applicant”) are encouraged to monitor their position on the Hangar Wait List, ready to provide the required documentation and accept the available space at the time it is offered.

B. The Applicant, after being notified of an available hangar or tie down, and accepting same is required to complete the current Hangar Lease Agreement in person, pay the associated fees, and provide the following within five business (5) days:
i. Copy of the applicant's pilot certificate, if applicable. ii. Valid Driver's license or government photo ID confirming eighteen (18) years of age or older.

C. Applicants must provide the following documentation upon completing a Hangar Lease Agreement and may forfeit the hangar and their position and status on the Hangar Wait List if not provided.
i. Provide proof of vested interest for the aircraft to be stored. ii. Provide a copy of the Certificate of Insurance for the aircraft to be stored with endorsements, amounts and coverage required as described in the Lease Agreement. This requirement does not apply to build projects or kit aircraft until construction is complete.

D. Applicants who are in default on any account with the City (including required taxes, rent and/or any other accounts) or in violation of any regulation or requirement herein may be disqualified and be ineligible for an opportunity to lease property at the sole discretion of the City. An applicant will be notified when this occurs and this paragraph is subject to appeal in accordance with City of Oakdale Municipal Code.

2.4 QUALIFYING FOR CORPORATE HANGAR
Periodically, the City of Oakdale will issue a Request Proposal (RFP) for Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Lease. The RFP solicits qualifications, information and Proposals from firms and individuals who may wish to enter into a long-term agreement for hangars and office spaces. Qualified firms and individuals with such an interest should contact the City of Oakdale Public Services Department for additional information. 82

Page 10 ends

3 GENERAL PROVISIONS

3.1 COMPLIANCE
Any employee, guest, lessee, permittee, tenant, vendor, visitor or User must comply with all Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards and all applicable laws, codes, and regulations as more specifically defined in Appendix A--Definitions/Abbreviations.

3.2 CITY OF OAKDALE STAFF – ACTIONS TO SAFEGUARD THE PUBLIC City of Oakdale Staff shall have authority to safeguard the public and further the public health, safety and welfare.

3.3 CITY OF OAKDALE STAFF – RULES AND REGULATIONS
Any and all persons shall be governed by the rules and regulations prescribed herein and by any permit, instruction(s) or other approval(s) issued by the City of Oakdale relative to the use or occupancy of any part of the Airport premises.

3.4 VIOLATION OF RULES
Any person who operates or handles any aircraft, vehicle, equipment or apparatus or uses the Airport or any of its facilities in egregious of repeated violation of rules set forth herein, may be prevented from further use of the Airport. In addition, such persons may be subject to the penalties provided herein or in the City of Oakdale City Code or elsewhere in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. The Airport Manager may refuse the further use of the Airport or its facilities to such persons for such length of time as he/she determines. Appeal of the Airport Manager’s decision may be made to the City Manager who has oversight of the Airport, whose determination shall be the final administrative determination of the matter. Chapter 19 of the City of Oakdale Municipal Code provides for Administrative Remedies.
4 SPECIAL PROVISIONS

4.1 ADVERTISEMENTS
No person shall post, distribute, circulate or display advertisements at the Airport; in its Pilot’s Center, on the Fuel Farm kiosk, or the parking areas without first obtaining the approval of the Airport Manager.
83

Page 11 ends

4.2 AIRPORT ACCESS
Airport access shall be allowed to only those persons authorized by the Airport Manager or by those having official business at the Airport.

4.3 AIRPORT ENTRY POINTS
The Airport entry gates provide access to its lessees and tenants at all times. The Airport Manager properly reserves the right to lock or unlock any gate at any time deemed necessary for the safety and/or security of the Airport or the public.

4.4 ANIMALS
I. All animals must be controlled on a leash or housed in an appropriate container.

II. Only assistance animals on proper leashes are permitted in Airport buildings or offices.

III. All animal waste must be properly disposed of in refuse containers or offsite.

4.5 CLEANING/WASHING OF AIRCRAFT
No aircraft washing or cleaning shall be permitted unless performed at the designated washrack area in compliance with all applicable storm water regulations, including the use of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) as approved by the Airport Manager.

4.6 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof, or any Airport facilities for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate use permit, lease or other such document from the City. Once the document is obtained, the person shall comply fully with all the terms and conditions of the document including the payment of rates and charges. Examples of such businesses include, but are not limited to, aviation/industrial use, commercial photography, advertising or soliciting. All business activities will be conducted as described in Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

4.7 DERELICT AIRCRAFT
Parking of derelict aircraft in paved tie-down areas is prohibited. Aircraft owners will be notified by registered mail that their aircraft has been identified as derelict and shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the date of such notice to remove or repair the aircraft to such a condition that it is no longer derelict. Failure to take action during the thirty (30) day period will result in the tow-away, removal, and/or storage of the aircraft from the 84

Page 12 ends

Airport. The tow-away, removal or storage of any such aircraft or components thereof shall be at the owner’s sole cost and expense and without liability to the City.

4.8 ENTERING RESTRICTED AREAS PROHIBITED
No person shall enter any restricted areas posted as being closed to the public or the like, except:

I. Persons assigned to duty therein;
II. Persons authorized by the Airport Manager; or
III. Passengers under appropriate supervision or escort, entering such areas for the purpose of debarkation.

4.9 EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL STORAGE
No person shall store or stock material or equipment in such manner as to constitute a fire hazard as defined by the applicable local, state and/or federal code(s). Equipment or material shall not be stored in an unsafe or unsightly manner as determined by the Airport Manager.

4.10 FIREARMS
No person shall shoot any projectile from a firearm or other device, into, on or across any portion of the Airport, nor have in their possession, or control, any firearm or explosive or explosive device which is not unloaded and securely wrapped, boxed and locked for shipment. This section does not apply to peace officers who are acting in the performance of their duties as such or the Airport Manager for purposes of Wildlife Deterrents and those that have a current Conceal Carry Permit in Stanislaus County. The Oakdale Municipal Airport or any facility thereon may not be used for any activity or use involving the sale, exchange, transfer or display of firearms.

4.11 FLAMMABLE MATERIAL STORAGE
No person shall keep or store any flammable liquids, gases or hazardous materials on Airport premises, in hangars, or in any building at the Airport in such a manner to or of such nature as to constitute a fire hazard. Fuel shall be stored in an appropriate, approved container. Cleaning solvents, lubricating oils, and other flammable liquids for use by the lessee may be stored in hangars in limited quantities in sealed metal containers. Sealed metal container size shall not exceed five (5) gallons, and total storage of flammable liquids in individual hangars shall not exceed six (6) gallons. 85

Page 13 ends

4.12 FLOOR CARE – REQUIREMENTS
All tenants and lessees at the Airport shall keep the floors of the hangars, apron, adjacent areas, leased, permitted or un-leased, free and clear of oil, grease and other flammable or hazardous material in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and codes.

4.13 GATE CONTROL
All entry points shall be positively controlled at all times. Under circumstances where an entry point gate is non-operational, said gate shall be immediately closed and locked and repaired. The Airport Manager reserves the right to lock any access point at any time.

4.14 GARBAGE AND REFUSE
No person shall place or dump any garbage, cans, bottles, papers, ashes, sewage, trash, rubbish or any other refuse in any location on the Airport except in trash containers plainly marked for such purposes. Tires or batteries of any type may not be deposited on the Airport. Hazardous materials should be properly disposed of offsite.

4.15 LUBRICATING OILS, DOPES, PAINTS AND THINNERS – STORAGE No person shall keep or store any lubricating oils, dopes, paints or thinners on Airport premises, in hangars, or in any building at the Airport unless stored in a flammable cabinet storage container.

4.16 HOURS OF OPERATION
The Airport shall be open for public use twenty-four hours per day, subject to any restrictions imposed by the Airport Manager due to inclement weather, the condition of the landing area, the presentation of special events, construction or repair activities, or similar causes. The Airport Manager is directed and authorized to close the Airport, or portions thereof, or suspend operations related to the landing, takeoff or taxiing of aircraft during any period in which he/she determines that such operations, or their continuance, would be hazardous. The Airport Manager shall immediately notify the nearest appropriate FAA facility to issue a notice to airmen advising of the closure.

4.17 INTOXICANTS AND DRUGS
No person shall operate aircraft, aircraft equipment or motor vehicles of any type on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug or intoxicating liquor. No person obviously under the influence of intoxicating liquor, prescribed medication or illegal drug shall be permitted to board any aircraft except in case of emergency. No 86

Page 14 ends

person shall operate equipment or motor vehicles on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor.

4.18 LOITERING/TRESPASSING
No person shall loiter or otherwise enter or remain upon Airport premises without lawful business or reason to be there or after having been directed by City of Oakdale Staff to leave the Airport premises.

4.19 LOST AND FOUND ARTICLES
Any person who finds lost articles can report and them to the Airport Manager. Any person who loses an article(s) should report it to the Airport Manager. Lost articles, other than aircraft and motor vehicles, will be kept for three months and then disposed of in the discretion of the Airport Manager in accordance with provisions of the Oakdale City Code.

4.20 MOTORIZED EQUIPMENT – OPERATION RESTRICTIONS:

I. No motorized equipment shall be operated on the aircraft apron area except by:
a. Persons assigned to duty thereon;
b. Persons trained and/or certified to operate equipment; c. Persons authorized by the Airport Manager; and
d. Licensed drivers

4.21 NOISE
No person shall operate any aircraft in flight or on the ground in such a manner as to cause unnecessary noise as determined by applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations.

4.22 OPEN-FLAME OPERATIONS
No person shall conduct any open-flame operations in any hangar or any part thereof unless specifically authorized by the Airport Manager. See section 5.6, Aircraft Repairs, for reference to tools required to perform aircraft maintenance.

4.23 PARKING OF VEHICLES
Vehicles shall not be parked on the Airport premises other than in designated areas and the manner indicated by posted parking, traffic signs or as designated by lease or permission.
87

Page 15 ends

4.24 SMOKING PROHIBITED
No smoking shall be permitted within 50 feet of the fuel farm, a fuel truck or any fuel storage facility or container at any time. No person shall smoke in any hangar, public building, public restroom, or place at the Airport where it is specifically prohibited by law or the Airport Manager. No person shall smoke within 20 feet of any entrance, exit or window of a City occupied facility.

4.25 SOLICITING
No person shall solicit funds, goods, donations or pledges at the Airport without written approval of the Airport Manager. Approval must be requested 5 business day in advance of requested event.

4.26 THROUGH THE FENCE OPERATIONS
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in Advisory Circular 150/5190-5, recommends that airport owners refrain from entering into Through-The-Fence agreements. The City understands that some Through-The-Fence operations may be beneficial to the Airport’s operation; therefore, consideration to Through-The-Fence agreements will be given on a case-by-case basis. Prospective Through-The-Fence operators will be expected to conform to the same operating standards (insurance, licenses, fees, commission payments, etc.) as on-site operators. At a minimum, prospective Through-The-Fence operators will be required to fulfill the following requirements: (1) pay an annual airport access fee; (2) pay a fair share lease equivalent rate; (3) construct any taxilanes necessary to access the airfield; and, (4) maintain airfield perimeter fence continuity. More information on Through-The-Fence operator expectations can be found in the Advisory Circular referenced in this Paragraph or by contacting the Airport Manager.

4.27 USE OF ROADS AND WALKS – USE RESTRICTIONS:

II. Without written permission from the Airport Manager, no person shall:
a. Operate any type of vehicle or motorized equipment on roads or walks except as designated by City Codes or in strict compliance with the California Vehicle Code. b. Travel on the Airport other than on the roads, walks or places provided for that particular class of traffic.
c. Use a motor vehicle without strict compliance with speed limits prescribed. No motor vehicle shall exceed the speed of 15 miles per hour except emergency vehicles in emergency situations or unless otherwise posted. 88

Page 16 ends

d. Use roads, walks or other places that will cause a Runway Incursion/Runway Deviation as defined by FAA Rules and Regulations or Orders. e. Use the roads or walks in such a manner as to hinder or obstruct access or use by others.
f. Walk across or on taxiway, runway, or enter a Movement Area (Movement Area Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update). 5 AIRPORT OPERATIONS

5.1 ABANDONED, WRECKED, DISMANTLED OR INOPERATIVE VEHICLES The City may abate and remove any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative motor vehicle, mobile equipment, or parts thereof from the Airport at the expense of the owner thereof pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Oakdale City Code. For the purposes of this section an abandoned motor vehicle is any motor vehicle or mobile equipment parked on the Airport for a period of fourteen (14) days or more without the prior approval of the Airport Manager.

5.2 AEROBATICS PROHIBITED
No aircraft shall be flown within the Airport traffic area in any aerobatic maneuver or maneuvers other than those required in normal and routine operation unless specifically approved by the Airport Manager and after obtaining FAA review and approval.

5.3 ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTS
Every person involved in an aircraft accident or incident on the Airport shall promptly provide a report of the details in the Aircraft Accident or Incident Report (Exhibit-B) to the Airport Manager and to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). When released by the FAA or the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB), the owner and/or pilot of an aircraft which is damaged in an accident shall be responsible for the prompt removal of the aircraft as directed by the Airport Manager. Where the pilot or the owner is unable to arrange for removal of such disabled aircraft, the Airport Manager shall have the authority to move or arrange the removal of the aircraft at the sole expense of the owner. No liability shall be incurred by the Airport Manager or others for damage aggravated by, or resulting from, such removal. If injuries or property damages occur, persons involved or witnesses shall contact emergency services immediately by dialing 911. 89

Page 17 ends

5.4 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT
It is recommended that every aircraft operating to, from or at the Oakdale Municipal Airport be equipped with a fully functional two-way radio capable of communicating on the appropriate frequency (122.8). All aircraft shall follow current FAA regulations and standard procedures as listed in the Airman’s Information Manual.

5.5 AIRCRAFT PARKING
Aircraft shall only be stored or parked at places designated by the Airport Manager and such storage or parking shall be at the sole risk of the owner or the operator of the aircraft, and without any responsibility of the Airport, the City, or any of its officers or employees, for any loss of or damage to the aircraft while so stored or so parked. The owner or operator of the aircraft shall be responsible for tying-down and securing the aircraft. The owner shall likewise be responsible for any liability arising from or caused by the aircraft or its activities.

Transient aircraft shall only be parked in the area designated by the Airport Manager. City of Oakdale Staff may secure or remove any aircraft parked in an unauthorized manner or unauthorized location at the expense of the owner. No liability shall be incurred by the Airport Manager or others for damage aggravated by, or resulting from, such removal.

Aircraft operators shall exercise considerable caution when removing tiedowns or relocating aircraft during heavy winds.

5.6 AIRCRAFT REPAIRS
Owners and operators may perform repairs on their own aircraft at limits established by the FAA for owner maintenance and, provided such work is conducted in an area that meets all health, safety and storm water regulations and in areas designated by the Airport Manager. Owners and operators may perform inspections and minor repairs on their aircraft in their assigned hangar or parking areas. Best Management Practices must be used when draining engine oil, hydraulic fluid, fuel, or using solvents. Flammable materials must be kept in a flammable cabinet storage container. All work must be done in compliance with all applicable storm water regulations. Except for waste oil all hazardous materials must be disposed of off Airport premises. Waste oil containers located on the Airport are for use by Airport tenants. No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof, or any Airport facilities, for revenue producing or commercial activities including aircraft repair and maintenance and no tenant may contract for services with a person using Airport facilities for such purposes who has not first secured a City of Oakdale Business License, an appropriate use permit, lease, or other such document from the City. 90

Page 18 ends

5.7 AIRCRAFT – FULL CONTROL REQUIRED
Following a landing, or prior to takeoff and while taxiing, the Pilot-In-Command (PIC) shall assure that there is no danger of collision with other aircraft taking off, landing or taxiing.

All aircraft shall be taxied under full control and at a reasonable speed.

5.8 AIRCRAFT OPERATION AREAS – LOCATIONS WHERE ENGINE OPERATIONS IS PERMITTED Aircraft engines shall be started and run only in those Aircraft Operation Areas (AOA) (Aircraft Operation Areas Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update) designated for such purposes by the Airport Manager. Aircraft shall be placed and oriented so that while an engine is running in the AOA, that hangars, shops, buildings, persons, or drainage areas are not in the path of the propeller slipstream, rotor wash or jet wash, and so that no dust cloud or other hazard to aircraft is created.

5.9 AIRCRAFT ENGINES – STARTING AND RUNNING
No aircraft engine shall be started or run unless the Pilot-In-Command, a licensed pilot or competent and qualified person is attending the controls and an effective brake is on and locked, or wheels are blocked.

5.10 AIRCRAFT ENGINES – OPERATION IN HANGARS PROHIBITED No aircraft engine shall be run or operated in any hangar.

5.11 CONFORMITY WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS
No person shall navigate, land upon, fly, maintain, repair any aircraft or conduct any aircraft operations at or from the Airport facility without compliance with all current FAA, City, and these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards. Master Lessees are fully and completely responsible for informing all employees (permanent or temporary) and any employee, guest, lessee, permittee, tenant, vendor, visitor, User entering through the gates (pedestrian or vehicle) of applicable operating rules and regulations. Lessees, permitees and tenants shall be responsible for the conduct of their employees, guests, vendors, visitors or Users.
91

Page 19 ends

5.12 DAMAGE TO AIRPORT PROPERTY
Any and all Airport property damaged or destroyed by an accident, an aircraft incident, or otherwise, shall immediately be paid for by the person or persons responsible for such damage or destruction. Under extenuating circumstances, payment may be deferred, provided that the Airport Manager authorizes deferred payment.

5.13 DANGEROUS CARGO
The loading, unloading or parking of aircraft or vehicles carrying explosive or highly toxic cargoes is prohibited except in areas designated by the Airport Manager.

5.14 DENIAL OF DEPARTURE OR LANDING CLEARANCE
City of Oakdale Staff may delay, suspend or restrict the landing of an aircraft, any ground movement or other operation or activity on the Airport, and may refuse departure of aircraft from parking areas at the Airport, for any reason deemed necessary in the public interest or to protect public health, safety or welfare.

5.15 DISPOSITION OF DISABLED AIRCRAFT AND INCOMPLETE REPAIRS The owner, pilot or operator of any aircraft which becomes disabled or wrecked at the Airport, including incomplete repairs, shall be responsible for the prompt removal of the disabled or wrecked aircraft, and parts thereof, as directed by the Airport Manager. In the event the owner, pilot or operator fails to comply with such directions, the disabled or wrecked aircraft, and parts thereof, may be removed by the City at the expense of the pilot.

Prompt aircraft removal is the responsibility of the owner unless directed to delay such removal pending an investigation of an accident by FAA or NTSB. Aircraft removal must be accomplished in a manner that is safe and prevents damage to Airport, City or personal property.

5.16 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
No person shall install or use any electrical equipment or machinery in the City hangars or modify existing wiring or install additional outlets, fixtures or similar items without prior written approval of the Airport Manager.

5.17 FEDERAL AND STATE AIR TRAFFIC RULES
All applicable and most current air traffic and flight rules of the FAA and the State of California governing the operation of aircraft are hereby adopted by reference. Strict 92

Page 20 ends

adherence to these rules and regulations is required at all times while operating at, to or from the Airport.

5.18 FUEL SALES
No person shall deliver or bring to the Airport any fuels or dispense such fuel from, at or upon the Airport for profit without permission from the Airport Manager. A gallonage charge shall be imposed for the right and privilege of making deliveries of all types of fuels and lubricants, to any person or location at or upon the Airport as specified in any permit, lease or other City approval. No fuel shall be stored anywhere on the Airport except in underground tanks, or such other tanks as may be approved by the Airport Manager and the Fire Marshall.

5.19 HANGAR INSPECTION
To the extent necessary to assure compliance with these Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards set forth herein, and those contained in the Oakdale Airport Minimum Commercial Aviation Business Standards or those contained in a lease or other agreement, the Airport Manager or authorized representative, and representatives of the FAA and state, county and City agencies having jurisdiction over the Airports have the authority to enter and inspect, upon reasonable notice during reasonable hours, structures, premises, facilities and improvements on the Airports.

5.20 INCURSION PREVENTION AND DEVIATION PREVENTION
All employees, guests, lessees, permittees, tenants, vendors, visitors or Users shall adhere to City policies and FAA regulations and procedures regarding the runway incursion prevention and vehicle/pedestrian deviation prevention. The FAA addresses general aviation airport safety at https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/

5.21 INTOXICANTS AND DRUG
No pilot or other member of the crew of an aircraft in operation on the Airport or any person attending or assisting in said operation of the aircraft, shall be under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor. No person obviously under the influence of intoxicating liquor, prescribed medication or illegal drug shall be permitted to board any aircraft except in case of emergency. No person shall operate equipment or motor vehicles on Airport premises while under the influence of an illegal drug, prescribed medication or intoxicating liquor.
93

Page 21 ends

5.22 LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The privileges of using the Airport or its facilities shall be conditioned upon the assumption of full responsibility and risk by the User of the Airport and upon the maintenance of insurance in amounts and in the manner specified by the Airport Manager. Such Airport User shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Oakdale its officers, agents and/or employees during all activities commenced or held by or at the direction of the User. Each aircraft based at the Airportshall be covered for bodily injury, property damage, and hangar liability insurance with limits established by the City of Oakdale. Vehicles operated on the Airport shall be adequately insured to the amounts of coverages required or otherwise as established by the State of California.

5.23 MAINTENANCE TAXI AND RUN-UP
Unless maintenance or ramp personnel are a licensed pilot or competent and qualified person and unless performed in areas specifically designated by the Airport Manager, no aircraft or vehicle maintenance shall be performed on the Airport premises without the prior permission of the Airport Manager. Engine run-ups not incidental to takeoff or landing shall be conducted in designated run-up areas only.

5.24 NIGHT FLYING
No person shall land at, taxi on or takeoff from an unlighted runway or taxiway after dusk or before dawn, as defined by the FAA, except in the event of an emergency or unless approved by the Airport Manager.

5.25 NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
The storage of non-airworthy aircraft or components thereof at the Airport or in tiedown spaces on Airport premises is prohibited, unless the express written consent of the Airport Manager is obtained. The tow-away, removal or storage of any such aircraft or components thereof shall be at the owner’s sole cost and expense and without liability to the City of Oakdale or to any of its officers or employees.

5.26 PAINTING
Painting and other similar processes shall only be conducted in buildings that are specifically designated for such activities and are in compliance with the local health and safety regulations, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District regulations and storm water regulations. Shelters or any open tiedown areas are not authorized for these activities. Minor “touch-up” painting may be accomplished in compliance with local health 94

Page 22 ends

and safety regulations, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District regulations and storm water regulations; however, the aircraft owner shall be held responsible for any damages to other aircraft and/or property due to over-spray associated with any painting activities.

5.27 SAFE HANDLING OF AIRCRAFT
The Pilot-In-Command (PIC) of a moving aircraft, or of an aircraft preparing or waiting to move, shall ensure that there is no danger of a collision with any other aircraft, whether moving or stationary, or with any building or obstruction. Aircraft shall at all times be taxied, landed, or taken-off at reasonable speeds and while under the full control of the PIC.

5.28 SECURING OF UNATTENDED AIRCRAFT
No aircraft shall be left unattended at the Airport unless properly secured or positioned in a hangar. Owners of such aircraft shall be held responsible for any damage resulting from failure to comply with this rule. See section 5.33

5.29 STORAGE AND REPAIRS – LOCATIONS
No aircraft shall be stored or repaired in any area or space other than those areas and spaces designated for such purposes by the Airport Manager.

5.30 TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS
Except in an emergency, all fixed wing aircraft shall make takeoffs and landings from the runway. Persons and aircraft reviewed and approved by the Airport Manager may be authorized to land in designated grassy areas.

5.31 TAXIING
It is recommended that every aircraft be taxied from aircraft parking area/apron onto taxiway or runway transmitting all intentions in the safest and most efficient manner. All aircraft shall be taxied under full control at a reasonable speed. No aircraft shall be taxied into or out of hangars at any time. Those aircraft without radios shall follow FAA regulations.

5.32 TAKING AIRCRAFT INTO CUSTODY
The Airport Manager may take into custody any abandoned, unclaimed or unauthorized aircraft, and thereafter shall retain custody thereof until claimed by the lawful owner or 95

Page 23 ends

owners who shall pay expense incurred by the Airport in connection therewith. Aircraft not claimed within ninety (90) days may be sold pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1208.61.

5.33 TURNS / TRAFFIC PATTERN / TRAFFIC ALTITUDES
The PIC shall follow all applicable FAA guidelines for traffic pattern maneuvers. The PIC shall adhere to specific traffic pattern or “fly as a good neighbor” guidelines or voluntary noise abatement procedures published by the City of Oakdale.
6 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall use the Airport, any part thereof, or any Airport facilities for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate Lease or Permit or other such document from the Airport and paying the fees and charges established for such use. Commercial activities shall be performed in accordance with the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

6.1 ADVERTISEMENTS
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall post, distribute, circulate or display advertisements at the Airport; in its Pilot’s Center, parking areas or on the Fuel Farm kiosk, without first obtaining the approval of the Airport Manager.

6.2 AUTHORIZATION
Commercial activities at the Airport shall be authorized in accordance with the provisions of a lease or permit issued by the City. No person shall use the Airport or any part thereof for revenue producing or commercial activities without first securing an appropriate lease, sublease, permit or other such document from the City. Having obtained such document, the commercial entity must comply with all terms and conditions including the payment of rates and charges. The Airport Manager may restrict the location where such activities occur for the requirement of public safety and convenience. The Airport Manager shall impose such restrictions on a permit as are reasonably necessary to protect the safety, efficiency or convenience of the Airport Users or the general public. Lessees and permittees shall conduct its activity in accordance with all provisions and procedures in compliance with all applicable codes as defined under “Definitions/Abbreviations” and the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport. 96

Page 24 ends

6.3 COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity without an existing business on the Airport shall take still, motion or sound pictures or photographs for commercial purposes without the permission of the Airport Manager. If such pictures are taken for compensation, a permit may be required.

6.4 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
Any person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity performing aircraft maintenance for compensation at the Airportshall obtain a permit from the Airport Manager and meet all requirements set forth in the Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport for aircraft maintenance and as defined by FAA regulations. No permit shall be required for Lessees or sublessees of the Airport property or their employees where their lease or sublease permits aircraft maintenance to be performed on their leasehold premises.

6.5 SERVICES AND DELIVERIES ON CITY OPERATED AIRPORT APRONS No person, firm, co-partnership, corporation association or other legal entity shall conduct any commercial delivery or service activity on the Airport aprons (including but not limited to, fueling of aircraft and ground service vehicles, catering in-flight meals and the performance of ramp services) without first obtaining a lease or permit. Permits shall be issued if the Airport Manager determines that the activity will be performed consistent with the safety and convenience of Airport Users and that a need exists for such activity.

Permits or leases shall require applicable fees be paid to the Airport Enterprise Fund for such commercial activities at the Airport.
7 HANGAR, T-HANGAR AND TIEDOWN AREA
For purposes of identification, all hangar buildings, T-hangars, and tiedown spaces at the Airport are designated by number and referenced in the Hangar Layout (Hangar Layout Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update). The following rules shall apply to all hangars and tiedown spaces rented to any person or entity by the Airport.

7.1 FACILITIES DEFINITIONS
I. Hangar – means any totally enclosed space intended for the sole purpose of storage of aircraft whether it be hangars, T-hangars, or the port-a-port units.

II. Tiedown Space – means any paved ramp surface designated for the parking of aircraft. 97

Page 25 ends

7.2 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
I. Damages – All City hangar tenants shall be responsible for hangar damage caused by their tenancy other than proven vandalism or acts of God, normal wear and tear excepted. All repairs will be made by the City at the sole cost of the tenant.

II. Electrical – No high amperage electrical equipment, heaters, or machinery shall be used in or around any City hangars nor shall any existing wiring be modified, nor shall any additional outlets fixtures or the like be installed. Extension cords in use in the hangar shall be of the three-wire industrial type with an Underwriters Laboratory (UL) rating.

Electric resistance heaters shall not be plugged into or attached to the electrical system.

Only heaters approved by Oakdale City Code for indoor use shall be operated in a hangar.

III. Fees – The Airport Manager shall establish and maintain available for examination upon request, a schedule of fees and charges for the use of the Airport and its facilities.

IV. Fire Extinguisher – Each tenant shall provide at least one fire extinguisher with a 2-A:10- B:C rating (or higher), with a current annual inspection tag, in the hangar, T-hangar or aircraft occupying said space at all times while tenant’s aircraft is in or about the facilities.

V. Fueling – There will be no fueling of aircraft within the hangars and aircraft will be removed completely from the hangar for fueling.

VI. Locks and Keys – City shall provide tenants of City owned hangars with a lock and two keys of which City has a master key. Private hangar tenants may have their own lock and key. To facilitate fire protection inspection and enforce these Standard Operating Procedures and FAA regulations, an approved Knox Box shall be installed and a key provided to the Airport Manager.

VII. Modifications – No modifications to City owned structures, including; wiring, painting, cutting, drilling, removing or other improvements or attachments shall be made or attached to the hangar or T-hangar structure without written permission of the Airport Manager and obtaining an associated permit. No stand-alone antennas will be erected on the Airport unless approved by the Airport Manager. No pulleys, slings or other lifting devices shall be attached to the building frame, supports or any other structural member of the hangar or T-hangar for the purpose of engine removal, aircraft support, or suspension of weight of any kind. Modifications to privately owned hangars may require a building permit, please contact the City of Oakdale Building Official prior to modification.

VIII. Occupancy – No person, firm, co-partnership or corporation shall occupy, sublease or use any hangar or tiedown space without first owning an airplane and having completed and signed an Aircraft Storage Permit approved for such purpose by the City of Oakdale.

Aircraft ownership and partnerships must be verifiable through FAA title records and registration. Those businesses that have been assigned hangars as use for aeronautical 98

Page 26 ends

business space as defined in the hangar rental policy are exempted from the Aircraft Storage Permit requirement.

IX. Parking – No aircraft may be parked in other than designated parking locations shown in (Parking Exhibit will be created in the Airports 2020 Airport Layout Plan Update).

X. Spills – Accidental spills shall be neutralized and cleaned up and disposed of in such a manner as to prevent them from damaging the pavement or entering the storm drain system.

XI. Storage – Hangars are designed specifically for the storage of owner’s aircraft. No hangar will be assigned to an individual who does not own an aircraft. Hangars will not be used for personal residence or for any use other than the storage of aircraft. Extra space may be utilized for storage of hangar occupants’ nonhazardous items.

XII. Sublet – Subject facilities will not be transferred or sublet to any third party, for a period exceeding ninety days. In the event the aircraft listed on the rental agreement is sold, or destroyed or otherwise disposed of, tenant shall have a period, not to exceed ninety days to obtain a replacement aircraft or the premises shall be vacated.

XIII. Use – Subject facilities shall not be used for stripping, painting, spraying or other treatment of aircraft, vehicles or articles that might deposit foreign materials on walls, floors or fixtures, or endanger neighboring aircraft finishes, hangar contents or hangar occupants. No hazardous materials including fuel, explosives, paint, paint thinner, varnish, gasoline, etc. shall be stored in any facility unless permitted by regulation.

XIV. Vehicles – Hangars shall not be used for temporary storage of vehicles other than those of the hangar tenant, and only when the tenant is using the normally stored aircraft on trips or during other such absence of the aircraft from the hangar. Aircraft owner’s, hangar and T-hangar tenants may park their personal vehicle and/or passenger’s vehicle within the hangar and T-hangars while absent on aircraft trips or flights. Ramp Space tenants may park their personal vehicle on their assigned space while absent on aircraft trips or flights. No vehicle may be parked in or around the paved surfaces of the hangar, T-hangar or ramp area unless the owner is in constant and adjacent attendance. Vehicles so parked will be parallel to the hangar building and parked as close to the hangar as possible.

XV. Vested Interest – is a right to property that so completely and definitely belongs to a person that it cannot be impaired or taken away without the person's consent. It is a right which is recognized by and protected by law for the infringement of which claim the state provides a remedy in its courts.

A vested interest in ownership of an aircraft may, in the Airport Manager’s reasonable discretion, be established by some or all of the following documents:
99

Page 27 ends

a. FAA AC Form 8050-2 (1/12) Aircraft Bill of Sale
b. FAA Form 850-98 (02/06) Aircraft Security Agreement (2/06) c. FAA Form 850-88 (3/12) Affidavit of Ownership for Amateur-Built/other non-type Certificated Aircraft
d. FAA Form 8130-6 (5/01) Standard Application for Airworthiness e. FAA Form 8050-1 Aircraft Registration Application
f. FAA Form AC 8050 1B (4/12) Aircraft Registration Renewal Application g. Certificate of Insurance satisfactorily identifying the aircraft, the owner and any lien holder
h. Financial lease which names a storage unit permittee as the responsible payer 8 HANGAR STORAGE OF AIRWORTHY, NON-AIRWORTHY AND AIRCRAFT

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

8.1 HANGAR STORAGE OF AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
I. Airworthy Aircraft - Hangars shall be rented to owners of Airworthy Aircraft at the rate set by the City of Oakdale City Council, as that rate may be adjusted from time to time.

An aircraft shall be determined to be airworthy at the time of the initial hangar rental and at a specific time once a year thereafter, where the Permittee provides documentation that the aircraft has been inspected and meets the FAA’s airworthiness criteria.

8.2 HANGAR STORAGE OF NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT AND AIRCRAFT UNDER

CONSTRUCTION
I. Non-Airworthy Aircraft – 14 CFR 91.7 prohibits any person from operating a NonAirworthy Aircraft. Hangar Permittees shall notify the Airport Manager, if in possession of, or when aircraft becomes a Non-Airworthy Aircraft. Section 8.1.i establishes that tenancy, in part, is based on renting to Hangar Permittees with an Airworthy Aircraft. The Hangar Permittee is provided up to 5 years, depending on the nature of the repairs, to meet the FAA’s airworthiness criteria. A repair schedule shall be submitted to the Airport Manager for approval. Periodic updates shall be required to show that the aircraft is on schedule to airworthiness.

II. Aircraft Under Construction - Hangar Permittees who are in the process of building an aircraft shall be required to show proof that they own the aircraft that will be stored in the hangar or that they are in possession of the major components including the engine, for that aircraft.
100

Page 28 ends

8.3 EXTENSIONS FOR NON-AIRWORTHY AIRCRAFT
I. Request for Six (6) Month Extension for Non-Airworthy Aircraft - Hangar Permittee’s who are actively working towards bringing their aircraft into an airworthy condition can request a one-time extension for up to six (6) months by submitting a written request to the Airport Manager. This request will be granted provided the hangar Permittee shows documentation that they are making significant progress in bringing their Non-Airworthy Aircraft into an airworthy condition.

FUEL SERVICING
All fuel-servicing activities on the City Airport must have a Fuel Concession Permit or Lease before any/all fuel is delivered or dispensed on Airport premises.

8.4 BLOCKING OF CONTROL DEVICES – PROHIBITED
No emergency control, deadman handle or similar safety device shall be blocked open or bypassed in such a manner as to circumvent the designed safety purpose of such device.

8.5 FUEL SPILL CONTROL – CLEAN UP
All fuel (or other hazardous/flammable liquid) spills must be controlled and cleaned up by the use of absorbent materials (BMPs) specifically designed for that purpose. Absorbent materials must be completely removed and properly disposed of once the fuel has been absorbed. All lessees, tenants, permitees of the fueling service must train personnel to follow their emergency response plan. Under no circumstances shall such liquids be flushed or otherwise allowed to enter into the storm drain system on the Airport premises. All BMP measures must be taken by employees to prevent any pollutants from entering the storm drain system on the Airport premises. If a required cleanup measure involves calling 911, then the Airport Manager must be immediately notified and appropriate reports must be submitted to the Airport Manager after completion of the cleanup activities on Airport premises.

8.6 FUEL SPILL NOTIFICATION
All fuel (or other hazardous/flammable liquid) spills in excess of 18 inches in any dimension must be reported immediately to Airport Manager.

8.7 FUELING OPERATIONS – ATTENDANT REQUIRED WHEN PASSENGERS IN CABIN No passenger or passengers shall be permitted in any aircraft during fueling unless a cabin attendant is present at or near the cabin door.
101

Page 29 ends

8.8 FUELING OPERATIONS – LOCATION RESTRICTIONS
No fueling or drainage of aircraft shall be conducted while an aircraft is located inside a hangar building. Fuel trucks must be parked 10 feet away from any building and 10 feet away from any other vehicle.

8.9 FUELING OPERATIONS – OPERATION OF ELECTRICAL APPARATUS PROHIBITED No person shall operate any radio transmitter, receiver, cell phone or switch electrical appliances on or off in an aircraft during fueling or draining of fuel.

8.10 FUELING OPERATIONS – PROHIBITED WHILE ENGINE RUNNING No aircraft shall be fueled or drained of fuel while the engine is running or while such aircraft is in a hangar or enclosed space. Emergency aircraft capable of “hot refueling” are exempt but must provide Airport Manager with proof of appropriate training.

8.11 FUELING OPERATIONS – REQUIRED EQUIPMENT
All fuel service facilities and equipment shall be in compliance with FAA/AC 150-5230 “Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling and Dispensing at Airport” and FAA/AC 150/5320 “Management of Aircraft Industrial Waste.” All fuel service facilities shall have a business plan posted noting emergency response employees and personnel associated with an emergency response plan for their fueling operations and have a copy of such emergency response plan on file with the City of Oakdale. All service facilities and equipment must be properly equipped with adequate fire extinguishers and trained personnel to operate such emergency response equipment. In addition, a spill kit must be on site and readily available during all fueling operations. All service facilities and equipment must have proper SWPPP/BMPs available and in use and trained personnel to use such methods and supplies until emergency response teams arrive on premises.

8.12 FUELING OPERATIONS – STATIC SPARK MATERIALS PROHIBITED No person shall use any material during fueling or draining of fuel from aircraft which is likely to cause a static discharge. All aircraft must be appropriately bonded prior to fueling. There will be no fueling allowed during an electrical or thunderstorm.

8.13 FUELING EQUIPMENT
Fueling hoses and draining equipment shall be maintained in safe, sound and non-leaking conditions and must have SWPPP/BMPs materials and procedures near all equipment used in fueling operations.
102

Page 30 ends

8.14 GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS DURING FUELING OPERATIONS:

I. All hoses, funnels and accessories used in fueling and draining operations shall be equipped with a grounding device to prevent ignition of volatile liquids.

II. During fueling, the aircraft and the fuel dispensing apparatus shall both be bonded to a point or points of zero electrical potential.

8.15 STARTING OF ENGINES PROHIBITED WHEN FUEL ON GROUND No person shall start the engine of any aircraft when there is fuel on the ground under such aircraft.
9 MOTOR VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT

9.1 AIRCRAFT RIGHT-OF-WAY
No person operating a motor vehicle on the Movement Area shall in any way hinder, stop, slow or otherwise interfere with the operation of any aircraft movement on the Airport. An aircraft always has the right-of-way.

9.2 COMMON CARRIERS
No bus, truck, taxi, limousine, motor home or other common carrier or vehicle for hire shall load or unload passengers or personal property at any place on any Airport premises other than that place or those places designated by the Airport Manager.

9.3 GROUND VEHICLE OPERATIONS ON AIRPORT
Motor vehicle operations in and/or on the Movement Area shall be governed in general by the provisions of the California State Motor Vehicle Codes and traffic directions procedures. Signals for turns, lights, and safe driving precautions shall be in conformity therewith. In addition, motor vehicles shall conform to regulations prescribed by the Motor Vehicle Code or procedures imposed pursuant to rules at Airport and in compliance with the FAA/AC 150/5210.

9.4 CROSSING RUNWAYS
I. No person operating a motor vehicle at the Airport shall enter, cross, or use any runway or taxiway to travel from one side of the Airport to another, or to travel from one location to another unless:
a. Vehicle is traveling under escort, or
b. Vehicle is specifically authorized by the Airport Manager, and 103

Page 31 ends

c. Vehicle displays an orange and white-checkered flag or yellow-flashing beacon on the top of the motor vehicle that is visible from the air for pilot’s safety.

II. Pedestrians, bicycles, wheelchairs, skateboards and scooters are prohibited from crossing runways and/or taxiways.

9.5 DRIVING PRIVILEGE REVOCABLE
The privilege to drive on the Movement Area may be revoked or suspended by the Airport Manager or the Master Lessee at any time to ensure public and pilot safety.

9.6 EMERGENCY VEHICLES
All vehicles shall at all times give way to emergency equipment responding to an alert or emergency.

9.7 FLASHING BEACON LIGHT/FLAG
No person shall operate a motor vehicle in the Airport Operations Area (AOA) of the Airport without proper knowledge of the FAA/AC 150-5210. All vehicles shall have an orange and whitecheckered flag (daytime use only) or an amber-flashing beacon installed on top of the vehicle that must be visible from the air.

9.8 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
No person shall operate a motor vehicle on the Airport unless the driver is licensed or authorized to operate such a vehicle by a government agency.

9.9 GATE ACCESS
Excepting visitors who have been invited on to the Airport by Airport Users no vehicle entering the Airport through an otherwise secured gate will allow another vehicle to follow directly behind the vehicle in front. All persons entering onto the Airport or departing from the Airportshall clear the gate, come to a complete stop, and wait until the gate has completely closed behind them.

Excepting authorized deliveries or guests every vehicle entering the Airport must have a gate card key to enter or be under escort by approved personnel

9.10 RADIOS REQUIRED
No person shall operate any motor vehicle on Airport runways or taxiways unless the motor vehicle is equipped with a functional two-way radio capable of communicating with the Airport Users on Oakdale Airport frequency 122.8 or is escorted by a vehicle so equipped. 104

Page 32 ends

9.11 SPEED LIMITS: (EXCLUDING EMERGENCY VEHICLES)
I. No person shall operate a motor vehicle of any kind at the Airport in excess of speed limits as prescribed by the Airport and as indicated by posted traffic signs.

II. If no signs are provided, no person shall operate any motor vehicle on the Movement Area at a speed in excess of 15 miles per hour.

9.12 RESTRICTED AREAS
No motorized equipment or vehicles shall be operated on the aircraft aprons of the field or on the taxiway and aircraft landing area, except by persons assigned to duty in those areas or by persons so authorized by the Airport Manager or their designee.

9.13 SECURITY MOTOR VEHICLES
Compliance is required with all rules and regulations noted below. Beacon as defined in FAA/Advisory Circular 150/5210 must be operational at all times when crossing runways and taxiways and during emergency responses on all the Airport premises. Additionally, headlights and parking lights shall be turned on during patrols throughout all periods of night (as defined by the FAA).

9.14 VEHICLE CONDITION/REPAIR:

I. No person shall operate any motor vehicle or equipment in the Airport parking areas or on the Movement Area unless such vehicle or equipment is in safe operating conditions for such operations and meets the basic safety requirements of the California Vehicle Code (i.e., brakes, running and parking lights, horn).

II. No person shall operate any motor vehicle or equipment in the Airport parking areas or on the Movement Area unless such vehicle or equipment is free from fuel, oil and hydraulic leaks
III. No person shall paint, repair, maintain or overhaul any motor vehicle or equipment on the Movement Area.

9.15 VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT PARKING AND STORAGE
Motor vehicles are defined as ambulances, aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, cars, vans, golf carts, buses, motorcycles and motor homes.

I. No person shall park or store any motor vehicle or other equipment or materials on or in the Movement Area except in a neat and orderly manner and at such points as may be prescribed by the Airport Manager or as noted by signage on Airport premises. 105

Page 33 ends

II. No person shall park any motor vehicle or other equipment or store materials on/in the Movement Area within 20 feet of any fire apparatus positioned for fire safety or near any emergency electrical vault building on Airport premises.

III. No person may park or store non-aeronautical vehicles or equipment on Airport Property (leased or non-leased) including motor homes, recreational vehicles (water or off-road), agriculture equipment, construction equipment or industrial equipment for any length of time without the written approval of the Airport Manager.

9.16 VEHICLE INSPECTION
City of Oakdale Staff is authorized to inspect and declare unfit for use on Airport property any vehicle or piece of equipment that, in the sole discretion of the City, poses a risk to public health or safety.

9.17 VEHICLE REMOVAL
City of Oakdale Staff may remove from the Airport any motor vehicle or equipment which is disabled, abandoned, parked or operated in violation of the Airport rules and regulations or which represents an operational hazard. Such a removal will be at the owner’s expense and without liability for any damage which may occur during the removal process. 106

Page 34 ends

10 APPENDIX A – DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS
A&P – Airframe and Powerplant
Abandoned – means any piece of equipment or vehicle that has been left on Airport property without the Airport Managers permission for more than fourteen (14) days has no current registration as required by law, or is incapable of being operated ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act
Advisory Circulars (AC) – means Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circulars ACs for the aviation industry.

Aeronautical Activity or Service – Any activity that involves, makes possible, or is required for the operation of aircraft or that contributes to or is required for the safety of such operations.

Agency – Any governmental (local, state, or federal) entity, agency, organization, unit, or authority.

Agreement – An enforceable by law, written contract between two or more parties.

Air Charter or Taxi – Providing air transportation for persons or property via air taxi or charter for hire.

Aircraft – means any and all conveyances, now or hereafter used for flight in airspace.

Aircraft Maintenance – Means the repair, adjustment, or inspection of aircraft. “Major Repairs” means major alterations to the airframe, power plant, propeller, and accessories as defined in 14 CFR Part 43. “Minor Repairs” means normal, routine repairs, calibration or adjustment or repair of aircraft and their accessories and repairs in accordance with an annual inspection with attendant maintenance.

Aircraft Operations Area (AOA) – means the area that is inside the Airport boundary in which aircraft movements take place as defined by the Federal Aviation Administration-Advisory Circular AC150/5300.

Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic (A&P Mechanic) – A person who holds an aircraft mechanic certificate with both airframe and power plant ratings, issued by the FAA under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 65.
107

Page 35 ends

Airport — means the Oakdale Municipal Airport (O27), its buildings and facilities, all lands owned by the City of Oakdale or the Oakdale Municipal Airport that are contiguous to the Airport, including airspace above such land and the designated approaches thereto.

Airport Layout Plan and Narrative (ALP) — The Airport Layout Plan and Narrative (Exhibit-C) is the current FAA-approved drawings depicting the physical layout of the Airport and identifying the location and configuration of current and proposed runways, taxiways, taxilane, buildings, roadways, utilities, navaids, apron, airport operations areas, etc.

Airport Manager — That person or his/her designated representative that is responsible for the administration and management of Airport property, operations, material assets, financial assets and employees.

Airport Manager Contact:

Michael Renfrow
City of Oakdale
455 South Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
209-845-3625
[email protected]
Airworthy Aircraft — means the aircraft conforms to its type design and is in a condition for safe operation.

Air Traffic – means aircraft operating in the air or on an Airport surface, exclusive of loading ramps or parking areas.

Airport Staff – means City of Oakdale employees who are assigned to or may work at the Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Airport Website – www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-airport.

ALUC – Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP – Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Apron – Those paved areas of the Airport within the AOA designated for the loading or unloading of passengers, servicing, or parking of aircraft.

Assurance – Voluntary compliance a recipient of Federal airport development assistance to abide by a provision contained in a Federal grant agreement.
108

Page 36 ends

BMP – Best Management Practice associated with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).

Building – The main portion of each structure, all projections or extensions there-from and any additions or changes thereto, and shall include hangars, garages, outside platforms and docks, canopies, eaves and patios. Paving, ground cover, fences, signs and landscaping shall not be included in this definition.

Certificated Flight Training School – Any operator who undertakes and engages in flight training via a pilot school certificate in accordance with FAR Part 141.

CFR – Code of Federal Regulations.

City – means the City of Oakdale.

Codes – Rules and Regulations Referenced – means the codes/rules as referenced below:
• NFPA 407 – Standard for Aircraft Fueling Servicing
• Aeronautics Law – State Aeronautics Act – Public Utilities Code • California Fire Code – Part IV – Special Occupancy Uses – Article 24 – Airport, Heliports, and Helistops
• Environmental Protection Agency
• FAA Advisory Circulars
• California Vehicle Code Sections – 211113, 22511.8, 22651, and 22652 • Federal Aviation Administration FAA – Advisory Circulars, Orders, Rules • Federal – Airport and Airway Act of 1970
• Federal – Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990
• Federal – Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 • Federal Clean Water Act
• Federal Americans with Disabilities Act
• Stanislaus County Environmental Health Code
• State Health and Safety Code
• State Penal Code
• State Vehicle Code
• State of California Code of Regulations – Title 21, Sections 3525 through 3560 • State of California Public Utilities Code – Sections 21001 et seq. relating to the Aeronautics Act
• Oakdale Municipal Airport – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs)
109

Page 37 ends

Commercial — That which involves or makes possible earnings, income, compensation (including exchange of service), and/or profit, whether or not such objectives are accomplished.

Commercial Aeronautical Activity — Any activity in which the purpose is to collect income, profit, compensation, or earnings (regardless of whether or not said purposes are accomplished) which utilized the operations in any part of an aircraft(s).

Commercial Operator — means any person who, for compensation for hire, engages in aviation or aviation-related activities such as, but not limited to, the following:
1) selling new and/or used aircraft and component parts; 2) aircraft and engine maintenance, repairs, and manufacturing; 3) using aircraft in the carriage of persons, property, freight, mail, etc, in the commerce; 4) aviation training (both ground and flight);
5) aerial photography;
6) air ambulance service;
7) aircraft agricultural operations (aerial applications, spraying of seed, fertilizers, pesticides, defoliants);
8) Aircraft rental charter and leasing;
9) Automobile and truck rentals to aircraft passengers and owners; and/or 10) Sales and/or repair of avionics.

Commercial Parachute Operator - a person or entity which imposes a charge in exchange for such services as air transport and airborne discharge of parachutists who intend to land within the designated PLA.

Derelict Aircraft – are defined as aircraft that are not in active restoration, construction, or maintenance or do not have current Registration or Airworthiness Certificate.

Equipment – All machinery, supplies, tools, trade fixtures and apparatus necessary to the proper conduct of the activity being performed.

Experienced Parachutist – means a parachutist that has a United States Parachute Association (“U.S.P.A”) license of Class “D” and who also has a U.S.P.A. Professional Exhibition rating (PROrating).

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – means the Federal Aviation Administration.

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) – means Federal Aviation Regulations. 110

Page 38 ends

Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) – means the Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards District Office.

Fixed Base Operator (FBO) – means any person or company who rents, leases or owns facilities located on the Oakdale Municipal Airport, who by virtue of his specific type of aviation (or aviation related) activity, requires the occupancy of a site contiguous to the apron with direct access to the aircraft operating area, and who engages in the business of selling aviation fuel, providing aircraft parking and providing other services which may include but not be limited to those described under “commercial operator” above.

Fire Code – The Fire Code adopted by the City of Oakdale.

Flight Training – The dual, solo and ground instruction of pilots in either a fixed or rotor wing aircraft to complete various FAA certifications and/or maintain proficiency.

Flying Club – shall mean an entity based on the Airport, as defined under “Airport” above, that is a nonprofit, non-commercial organization or association of three (3) or more aircraft owners who proportionally and equally own and/or use its aircraft for personal use and enjoyment only. No member shall be paid for the club management or other direct service.

Hangar Wait List or HWL – is that chronologically ordered list of Position Holders who have completed an Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application and paid the associated fees.

Hazardous Materials – Means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste, which is or becomes regulated by any local government authority, State of California or the United States Government. The term "Hazardous Material" includes, without limitation, any material or substance that is: (1) defined as a "hazardous substance" under appropriate state law provisions; (2) petroleum; (3) asbestos (4) designated as "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC Section 1321); (5) defined as "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 USC Section 9601); or (6) defined as a "regulated substance" pursuant to Subchapter IX, Solid Waste Disposal Act (Regulation of Underground Storage Tanks) (42 USC Section 6991).

Improvements – All buildings, structures and facilities, including, but not limited to, pavement, fencing, signs and landscaping constructed, installed or placed on, under or above any leased area by or with the concurrence of a lessee. Plans and specifications for all improvements must be approved by the City for conformity with its building and construction standards. 111

Page 39 ends

Lease – A contractual agreement between the City and a person, granting the use of a defined ground area on the Airport for a term of years, and establishing conditions for its use.

Leased Premises – Land, property, buildings and other improvements leased by an operator for performance of their approved activities.

License – A contractual agreement between the City and a person, granting a concession or otherwise authorizing the conduct of a commercial activity on the Airport, which is in writing and enforceable by law. A license may be a stand-alone document, or may be combined with a lease into one document.

Master Lease – means a portion of an Airport that is leased to an individual or entity as approved by the City in an Aviation/Industrial Master Lease contract.

Minimum Standards – Criterion established by the City of Oakdale and the Airport Manager that must be met by businesses engaged on Airport for aeronautical activities and the right to conduct those activities.

Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport - The Minimum Commercial Standards for Aeronautical Business Activity at Oakdale Municipal Airport are intended to provide the minimum threshold requirements for any entity wishing to provide aeronautical services to the public on the Airport. A copy will be maintained current to reflect any amendments and will be available in the Airport Manager’s office and on the Airport Website at www.oakdalegov.com/oakdale-municipal-Airport. The Airport Manager will provide additional copies to any User who requests such a copy Movement Area (MA) – means the runways, taxiways, and other areas of the Airport which are used for taxiing, hover taxiing, air taxiing, takeoff, and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and aircraft parking areas and as further defined in the FAA/AC 150-5300 “Airport Design.” National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) – means the Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety Board.

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) – All codes, standards, rules, and regulations contained in the Standards of the National Fire Protection Association, as may be amended from time to time, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Non-Airworthy Aircraft – means the aircraft does not conform to its type design and is not in a condition for safe operation.
112

Page 40 ends

Non-Commercial – Not for the purpose of securing earnings, income, compensation (including exchange of service), and/or profit.

Non-Movement Area – means aircraft aprons, ramps, taxilanes and parking areas where twoway radio communications with other Users is not required by aircraft or ground vehicles on Airport premises and as further defined in the FAA/AC 150-5300 “Airport Design.” Operator – Means any person based on the Airport and providing one or more commercial aeronautical services. All Specialized Aviation Service Operators (SASOs), are defined as operators, per se.

Pedestrian – means a person on foot, on a bicycle, in a wheelchair (motorized or manual), on a skateboard (motorized or manual) or on a scooter (motorized or manual).

Permit — means written permission of the City Council or the Airport Manager to engage in a specified activity at the Airport.

Person – means any individual, estate, firm, association, political body, business, organization, flying club, group, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or other legal entity including any member trustee, agent, employee, officer, receiver, assignee, or other representative of any of these.

Positive Control – Absolute or Active control.

Principals – For corporations, the directors, officers and stockholders holding more than 10% of company stock. For partnerships, all general and limited partners. For limited liability entities, all managers and members holding more than a 10% interest. For other entities, all those having authority to act for the entity, or being a 10% or greater beneficiary or interest holder.

Property – Pertains to anything owned by an entity.

Ramp – A paved area suitable for aircraft parking.

Regulatory Measures – Federal, state, county, city, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including, those of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), United States Department of Homeland Security, FAA, TSA, NFPA, Aircraft Rescue and Fire - fighting Standard Operating Guidelines and these standards; all as may be in existence, hereafter enacted, and amended from time to time.

Release – Any releasing, disposing, discharging, injecting, spilling, leaking, pumping, dumping, emitting, escaping, emptying, seeping, dispersal, transporting, and similar actions, the moving of 113

Page 41 ends

any material through, into or upon any land, soil, ground water, or air, or otherwise entering into the environment.

Repair Facility – A facility utilized for the maintenance, repair and overhaul of Aircraft to include airframe, power plant, propellers, radios, instruments and accessories. Such facility will be operated in accordance with pertinent FAA regulations.

Repair Station – An Aircraft Maintenance facility certificated under 14 CFR Part 145 and the FAA to perform specific maintenance functions.

Runway – means a surfaced or un-surfaced area of the Airport reserved primarily for the landing and taking off of aircraft.

Self-Fueling – means fueling an aircraft that is owned in whole or partnership by the person fueling. This does not include fueling at the self-service fuel island.

Self-Service – Includes activities such as adjusting, repairing, cleaning and otherwise providing service to an aircraft, provided the service is performed by the aircraft owner or his/her employees with resourcessupplied by the aircraft owner. See FAR Part 43 for allowed self-service activities.

Sky Dive Customer – means any person who, by virtue of a contract or arrangement with a Commercial Parachute Operator, intends to parachute onto the Oakdale Airport.

Specialized Aviation Service Operator – Specialized Aviation Service Operator (SASO) is an aeronautical business that offers single or limited services.

Sublease – means a portion of the Airport that is subleased to an individual person or entity by a Master Lease/Lessee for a portion of the Master Lease parcel with approval by the Airport Manager.

Taxiway – means a defined path established for the taxiing of aircraft from one part of the Airport to another.

Taxilane – means the portion of the aircraft parking area used for access between taxiways and aircraft parking positions.

Tie-Down – The area, paved or unpaved, suitable for parking and mooring of aircraft wherein suitable tie- down points have been located.

Transient Aircraft – Any aircraft utilizing the Airport for occasional transient purposes and which is not based at the Airport.
114

Page 42 ends

Ultralights – There are several regulatory options available to ultralight owners, each offering unique privileges and limitations. Differing amounts of effort are required to achieve and maintain the option you choose. Ultralights fall under two basic sets of rules; either ultralight rules (Ultralight Vehicles) or General Aviation rules (Ultralight Aircraft). Detailed rules for each option are located in FAA and industry publications.

User(s) – any Employee, Guest, Lessee, Permittee, Tenant, Vendor, Visitor, User or other individual or business using or visiting the Airport.

Vehicle – means auto, truck, fuel truck, golf cart, motorcycle, moped, or any motorized equipment.
115

Page 43 ends

11 OAKDALE OPERATING RULES, REGULATIONS AND MINIMUM STANDARD

EXHIBITS
Exhibit-A: Oakdale Municipal Airport Hangar Wait List Application Exhibit-B: Aircraft Accident or Incident Report
Exhibit-C: 2016 Oakdale Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 116
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
1)
2)
Applicant Name:

Mailing Address:

Alternate Address:
3)
 Yes  No
Number:

Model:

Aircraft storage at the Oakdale Airport (Select all that apply):

Email Address:

Phone:
 City Owned Hangar
The applicants name listed above will be used to complete the hangar lease agreement and must be listed on the FAA aircraft registration and insurance certificate.

Alternate Phone:

Aircraft Information
Is the aircraft a homebuilt kit or a kit under construction? Aircraft Hangar Waiting List Application
Applicant Information
 Tie Down
Date:

Applicant Signature:

Manufacturer:

Office Use Only
Date Received:

Time Received:

Received By:

Application Processing Fee:  $50
Exhibit-A: Aircraft Hangar Wait List Application 117
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
Initial:____ I have read, understand and acknowledge the City Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy.

Section 2.2 of the Operating Rules, Regulations and Minimum Standards for Users of the Oakdale Municipal Airport is provided below:

Hangar Wait List Administrative Policy Acknowledgement

2.2 CITY HANGAR WAIT LIST ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
H. Applicants are required to pay an annual Application Processing Fee in order to maintain status as a position on the HWL. An invoice will be generated annually by City of Oakdale Finance Department and mailed to the Position Holder. Failure to pay the annual Application Processing Fee in the time allotted will classify the Position Holder as “inactive”.

F. Due to historical high demand for hangar space, HWL Position Holders are best served by ensuring the Airport has current e-mail and telephone number(s).

G. At any time should an “inactive” applicant desire to restore their status to “active”, that applicant should contact the City. An Application Processing Fee will be charged to restore the status to “active” and the applicants name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the new application.

A. The Airport maintains a chronologically ordered Hangar Wait List (HWL) for individuals or entities desiring hangars.

C. Position Holders name will be listed in chronological order based on the date of the application with earlier dates “higher up” the HWL.

D. When a hangar becomes available and after the Swap List is exhausted, the first Position Holder on the HWL, as posted on the Airport Website, will be contacted.

Exhibit-A: Aircraft Hangar Wait List Application 118
City of Oakdale
Public Services Department
455 S. 5th Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone:

Phone:

Model:

Fatalities:

Location:

Date:

Approved By:

FAA/NTSB Classified as:

Number of injured: Total No. in Aircraft:

Aircraft Home Airport:

Remarks:

Report Completed By:

Additional Data:

Airport Staff: Date Investigated:

Certificate:

Aircraft Make:

Witness Name:

Address:

Witness Name:

Address:

Owners Name:

Address:

Policy Number:

Pilots License No. Insurance Co.:

Address:
Yes No
Pilot Name:

Pilot, Passenger, and Aircraft Data
Time Call Received City Property Damaged?
Explain Incident:

Date Call Received Call Received By:

Phone:

Aircraft Accident or Incident Report
Name:

Address:

Reporting Party Information
Exhibit-B: Aircraft Accident or Incident Report 119
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 120 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 121 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 122 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 123 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 124 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 125

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

NARRATIVE REPORT
for

OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Oakdale, California
Prepared for

CITY OF OAKDALE
by
Coffman Associates, Inc.

October 2015
“The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Title 49, United States Code, section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws.” Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 126

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OAKDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
ALP NARRATIVE REPORT Oakdale, California
AIRPORT PLANNING ROLE .................................................................................................................................. 1 HISTORICAL GRANTS ............................................................................................................................................. 2 AIRPORT HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................ 3 AIRPORT SETTING AND ACCESS ....................................................................................................................... 3 Climate ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 AIRPORT SERVICE AREA ...................................................................................................................................... 4 AREA LAND USE ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Height and Hazard Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 7 AIRPORT FACILITIES .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Airside Facilities ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Landside Facilities ................................................................................................................................... 12 AIRSPACE CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................................................... 14 Special Use Airspace ............................................................................................................................... 14 Air Traffic Control .................................................................................................................................... 15 Local Operating Procedures ................................................................................................................ 15 SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................................................... 15 Population ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Employment ............................................................................................................................................... 17 NATIONAL AVIATION TRENDS AND FORECASTS ................................................................................... 19 National Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 19 General Aviation Trends ....................................................................................................................... 20 AVIATION FORECAST METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 21 Risks to the Forecasts ............................................................................................................................ 22 FORECASTS OF AVIATION DEMAND ............................................................................................................. 23 Based Aircraft ............................................................................................................................................ 23 General Aviation Operations ............................................................................................................... 28 Peaking Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 29 Air Taxi Operations ................................................................................................................................. 31 PLANNING HORIZONS.......................................................................................................................................... 31 FAA DESIGN STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................. 33 Aircraft Design Standards .................................................................................................................... 34 SAFETY AREA DESIGN STANDARDS .............................................................................................................. 36 Runway Safety Area ................................................................................................................................ 37 Runway Object Free Area ..................................................................................................................... 38 Runway Obstacle Free Zone ................................................................................................................ 38 Runway Protection Zones .................................................................................................................... 38 AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 40 Runways ...................................................................................................................................................... 40 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 127 (Continued)
Taxiways ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 Airfield Marking, Lighting, and Signage ......................................................................................... 44 Navigational Approach Aids ................................................................................................................ 44 Weather Reporting Facilities .............................................................................................................. 45 LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 45 General Aviation Terminal Area ........................................................................................................ 46 Aircraft Storage Hangars ...................................................................................................................... 46 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 48 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ................................................................................................................................. 48 PAST PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 CONSIDERATION OF NON‐DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 49 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 49 Transfer Services to Another Airport ............................................................................................. 49 Development of a New Airport .......................................................................................................... 50 RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ............................................................................................. 50 Airside Considerations .......................................................................................................................... 50 Landside Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 51 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 51

EXHIBITS
A LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP ..................................................................................... after page 4 B AIRFIELD FACILITIES ........................................................................................................ after page 8 C EXISTING LANDSIDE FACILITIES ............................................................................... after page 12 D VICINITY AIRSPACE .......................................................................................................... after page 14 E U.S. ACTIVE GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FORECASTS ............................. after page 20 F REGISTERED AIRCRAFT FORECAST SUMMARY .................................................. after page 26 G BASED AIRCRAFT FORECAST SUMMARY ............................................................... after page 28 H FORECAST SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... after page 32 J AIRCRAFT REFERENCE CODES ................................................................................... after page 34 K WIND ROSE .......................................................................................................................... after page 42 L AIRSIDE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. after page 46 M LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... after page 48 N RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ......................................................... after page 50 APPENDIX A – AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWINGS
APPENDIX B – FAA ALP APPROVAL LETTER & SIGNED ALP
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 128 1 The purpose of the airport layout plan (ALP) narrative report is to provide the City of Oakdale, the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) - Aeronautics Division, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) with a clear vision of necessary airport improvements over the next 20 years. This document will focus on the facility changes and development direction of the airport that has occurred since the preparation of the 1996 Airport Master Plan.

The report will also include an updated ALP drawing set, which is a drawing of the airport that shows the current and future conditions. The ALP will follow guidance in Appendix F of Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans. These draft drawings will be included as an appendix to the ϐinal Narrative Report.

AIRPORT PLANNING ROLE
Airport planning exists on many levels: national, state, and local. Each level has a different emphasis and purpose. On the national level, Oakdale Municipal Airport is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). This federal plan identiϐies 3,330 existing airports which are considered signiϐicant to the national air transportation system. The NPIAS is published and used by the FAA in administering the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) which is the source of federal funds for airport improvement projects across the country. The AIP program is funded exclusively by user fees and user taxes, such as those on fuel and airline tickets. The 2013-2017 NPIAS estimates $42.5 billion is needed for airport development across the country over the next ϐive years. An airport must be included in the NPIAS to be eligible for federal funding assistance through the AIP. Oakdale Municipal Airport is classiϐied as a general aviation airport within the NPIAS.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 129 2 “... the FAA has provided
funding assistance at Oakdale
Airport through the Airport
Improvement Program (AIP).”
The NPIAS supports the FAA’s strategic goals for safety, system effi‐ ciency, and environmental compatibility by identifying specific airport improvements. The current issue of the NPIAS identifies approxi‐ mately $3.2 million in development needs over the next five years for Oakdale Municipal Airport. This figure is not a guarantee of federal funding; instead, this figure represents development needs as pre‐ sented to the FAA in the annual airport capital improvement program.

Airports that apply for and accept AIP grants must provide grant as‐ surances. These assurances include maintaining the airport facility safely and efficiently in accordance with specific conditions. The du‐ ration of the assurances depends on the type of airport, the useful life of the facility being developed, and other factors. Typically, the useful life for an airport development project is a minimum of 20 years.

Therefore, when an airport accepts AIP grants, they are obligated to maintain that facility in accordance with FAA standards for at least that long.

At the state level, the airport is included in the California Aviation Sys‐ tem Plan (CASP). The purpose of the CASP is to ensure that the state has an adequate and efficient system of airports to serve its aviation needs well into the 21st century. The CASP defines the role of each airport in the state’s aviation system and establishes funding needs.

The airport master plan is the primary local planning document. The master plan is intended to provide a 20‐year vision for airport devel‐ opment based on aviation demand forecasts. Forecasts beyond five years become less reliable. The most recent forecasts were completed in the 1996 Airport Master Plan. As a result, this is an appropriate time to update these forecasts and revisit the development assump‐ tions from that plan. This document is intended to bridge the gap be‐ tween the timeframe needed for a full update to the existing airport master plan.

HISTORICAL GRANTS
To assist in funding capital improvements, the
FAA has provided funding assistance at Oakdale
Airport through the Airport Improvement Pro‐
gram (AIP). The AIP is funded through the Avia‐
tion Trust Fund, which was established in 1970 to
provide funding for aviation capital investment
programs to include aviation development, facilities and equipment, and research and development. The Aviation Trust Fund also finances a portion of the operation of the FAA. A summary of capital improve‐ ment projects completed at Oakdale Airport since 2000 is presented in Table A.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 130 3 “The airport currently
encompasses 116 acres of
land …”

TABLE A
Historical AIP Grant History
Oakdale Airport
Fiscal
Year
FAA
Grant #
FAA
Grant Total Description of Project
2000 06 $2,016,000
Extend and rehabilitate runway; Construct hold apron; Install guidance signs and perimeter fencing; Improve airport drainage; Relocate/install visual guidance system.
2002 07 $905,000
Improve runway safety area and airport drainage; Construct run‐ way safety area for Runway 28 approach.
2003 08 $1,450,000
Improve runway safety area; Install taxiway lighting; Extend taxi‐ way; Install runway lighting and airport guidance signs. 2006 09 $450,000 Rehabilitate runway.
2010 10 $100,000 Install perimeter fencing (Design); Rehabilitate taxiways (Design). 2011 11 $75,000 Update Airport Layout Plan/Narrative Report 2012 12 $398,700 Install perimeter fencing (construction); Rehabilitate taxiways Source: FAA

AIRPORT HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION
Oakdale Municipal Airport was established in 1947 as a private avia‐ tion facility. At its inception, the airfield consisted of a 1,800‐foot primary runway and a 1,650‐foot crosswind runway, both unpaved and unlighted. A main hangar and a few out‐buildings were also con‐ structed at this time to house a flying school that trained pilots.

In 1960, the airport was purchased by the City of Oakdale. Fifty‐seven acres of land and major improve‐
ments were purchased together along with the fueling system and miscellaneous equipment. Over time, the crosswind runway was abandoned and the primary runway was ex‐ tended to its present length of 3, 013 feet, with a parallel taxiway and airfield lighting installed by the City. Numerous hangars have also been constructed at the airport over the years. The airport currently encompasses 116 acres of land and continues to be owned and oper‐ ated by the City. The airport is also known as Dan Donnelly Field, named after one of the local aviation pioneers.

AIRPORT SETTING AND ACCESS
The City of Oakdale is located in Stanislaus County, approximately 15 miles northeast of Modesto at the base of the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Regional access from the City to the east and north is provided by State Highways 108 and 120, respectively. These two highways converge within the city limits and provide access from Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 131 4 the City to the west. Highway 99, a major north‐south highway through Central California, is located 15 miles to the west of Oakdale.

The airport is located approximately three miles southeast of the cen‐ tral business district. Access to the airport is via Laughlin Road from Sierra Road. The location of Oakdale Municipal Airport in its regional and local setting is depicted on Exhibit A.

CLIMATE
Weather conditions are important to the planning and development of an airport. Temperature is an important factor in determining run‐ way length requirements, while wind direction and speed are used to determine optimum runway orientation. The need for navigational aids and lighting is determined by the percentage of time that visibil‐ ity is impaired due to cloud coverage or other conditions.

The climate of Oakdale is typical of the San Joaquin Valley, with mild winters and hot, dry summers. Temperatures range from the mid 30’s to the high 60’s during the winter and from the 70’s to the low 100’s during summer. Rainfall is moderate, averaging 12‐14 inches per year, and occurs primarily during the winter months. Frequent tem‐ perature inversions which occur during the winter cause low stratus fog conditions, resulting in poor ground level visibility. Table B summarizes monthly climatic data for the City of Oakdale. This in‐ formation was gathered from the Weather Channel’s online database.

TABLE B
Climate Conditions
Oakdale, CA
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.

Avg. High Temp (oF) 56 63 69 75 83 90 95 94 89 79 66 56 Avg. Low Temp (oF) 40 43 46 49 55 60 63 62 59 53 45 40 Average
Precipitation (in.) 2.61 2.46 2.04 0.97 0.63 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.26 0.68 1.36 2.04 Source: www.theweatherchannel.com

AIRPORT SERVICE AREA
Defining a service area for an airport can be useful in the forecasting process. Once a general service area is identified, various statistical comparisons can be made for projecting aviation demand. For exam‐ ple, in rural areas, where there may be one airport in each county, the service area could reasonably be defined as the entire county. This would facilitate comparisons to county population and employment for forecasting purposes.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 132 BR
101
101
101
50 395
5 5
5 5
5 80
80 80
80 505
205
580 580
680
680
280
280
880
580
780
101
101
50 San Miguel
Glen Ellen
Le Grand
Maricopa
Lost Hills
South Dos Palos
Lower Lake ower Lake
Buttonwillow
Linden
Tipton
Foresthill
Kettleman City
Laton
Colfax
Esparto
San Juan Bautista
San Martin
Wheatland
Richgrove
Arbuckle
Riverdale
Sutter Creek
Squaw Valley Squaw Valley
Strathmore St
Pixley
Oakhurst
Sutter
Lockeford
Terra Bella Ter
Kings Beach
Williams
San Joaquin
Diamond Springs
Templeton
Cayucos
French Camp
Delhi
Ivanhoe
Yountville
Hughson
Angwin
Rio Vista
Planada
Denair
Fowler
Gustine
Carmel-By-The-Sea
Pollock Pines
Gridley
Salida
Live Oak
Winters
Palermo
Castroville
Saint Helena
Gonzales
Firebaugh
Huron
Newman
Guadalupe
Oceano
Taft
Woodlake
Waterford
Boulder Creek Chowchilla
Kerman
Ione
Nipomo
McFarland
Orange Cove
Mendota
Winton
Ben Lomond
Pismo Beach
Exeter
Kingsburg
King City
Lathrop
Ripon
Sonoma
Lindsay Li
Lincoln
Greenfield
Coalinga
Soledad
Grass Valley
Patterson
Olivehurst
Morro Bay
Truckee
Half Moon Bay
Shafter
Lamont
Avenal
Dixon
Brentwood
Corcoran
Dinuba
Galt
Lemoore
Selma
Elk Grove
Sanger
Wasco
Los Banos
Paso Robles
South Lake Tahoe
Atwater
Marina
Atascadero
Florin
San Pablo
Oildale Oild
Rocklin
San Carlos
Los Altos
Monterey
Morgan Hill
Saratoga
Ceres
Delano
Watsonville
Gilroy
Porterville Po
San Ramon
Tulare
Pacifica PacificaSan Bruno
Cupertino
Tracy
Rancho Cordova
Davis
Lodi
Palo Alto
Walnut Creek
Clovis
Livermore
Santa Maria
Antioch
Vacaville
San Mateo
Daly City
Berkeley
Citrus Heights
Vallejo
Concord
Hayward
Fremont
Sacramento
Mariposa
San Andreas
Nevada City
Jackson
Colusa
Willows Oroville
Auburn
Hollister
Martinez
Madera
Hanford
Woodland
San Luis Obispo
San Rafael
Santa Cruz
Merced
Napa Fairfield
Visalia
Salinas
Modesto
Bakersfield Bak
Stockton
Oakland
Fresno
San Francisco
San Jose

OAKDALE

MUNICIPAL

AIRPORT
Sierra Northern Railway Sierra Northern Railway
Tulloch Rd.

Municipal
Airport
Oakdale
Sout h Main Canal Sout h Main Canal
Laughlin Rd.

S Stearns Rd.Wren Rd.

Oakdale

CALIFORNIA NEVADA
Pacific
Ocean
Exhibit A

LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP
Maricopa
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 133 5 In regions where there are many airports, the definition of the service area is not as simple. Aircraft owners in areas with more airports have more choices when it comes to basing their aircraft. The most common reason aircraft owners cite for choosing an airport at which to base their aircraft is convenience to home or work. Other reasons may include the capability of the runway system, availability of hang‐ ar space, and the services available. Therefore, the primary limiting factor to defining an airport service area is the proximity of other air‐ ports that provide a similar or greater level of service.

The service area generally represents where most, but not all, based aircraft will come from. It is not unusual for some based aircraft to be registered outside the county or even outside the state. In regions with several airports in relatively close proximity, service areas will likely overlap to some extent.

A review of public‐use airports within 30 nautical miles of Oakdale Municipal Airport has been made to identify and distinguish the type of air service provided in the region. Information pertaining to each airport was obtained from FAA 5010 reports. Table C identifies the major characteristics of each airport.

TABLE C
Vicinity Airports
Airport Name
Distance
(nm)
NPIAS*
Role
Longest
Runway
Based
Aircraft
Annual
Operations1
Instrument
Approaches
Modesto City‐County 11 SW Primary 5,904’ 186 42,3001 Yes Turlock Municipal 17 SSE GA 2,985’ 49 10,200 No
Stockton Metro 22 WNW Primary 10,650’ 160 54,3001 Yes New Jerusalem 24 W None 3,530’ None 4,000 No
Calaveras County 25 NNE GA 3,603’ 49 32,100 Ye s
Columbia Airport 25 NE GA 4,673’ 107 46,000 Yes
Castle Airport 25 SSE None 11,802’ 76 67,3001 Yes
Source: FAA 5010 Form
*National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems.
1FAA Tower Reports (2012), others are estimated.

Modesto City‐County Airport (owned by the City of Modesto) is lo‐ cated approximately 11 nautical miles southwest of Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport is served by two runways, the longest of which is 5,904 feet. The airport is equipped with an airport traffic control tower (ATCT), which reported 42,300 annual operations in 2012. There are three published instrument approaches available and 186 aircraft are based at Modesto City‐County Airport. Services avail‐ able include aircraft hangars and tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 134 6 Turlock Municipal Airport (owned by the City of Turlock) is located approximately 17 nautical miles south‐southeast of Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport is served by a single 2,985‐foot runway.

There is no ATCT at the airport and there are no published instrument approaches available. There are 49 aircraft based at Turlock Munici‐ pal Airport. The airport has an average of 28 operations per day. Ser‐ vices available at the airport include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL), and aircraft maintenance.

Stockton Metro Airport (owned by the County of San Joaquin) is lo‐ cated approximately 22 nautical miles west‐northwest of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by two runways, the longest of which is 10,650 feet. The airport is equipped with an ATCT, which reported 54,300 annual operations in 2012. There are four published instrument approaches available and 160 aircraft are based at Stock‐ ton Metro Airport. Services available include aircraft hangars, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

New Jerusalem Airport (owned by the City Tracy) is located approx‐ imately 24 nautical miles west of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The air‐ port is served by a single 3,530‐foot runway. There is no ATCT at the airport and there are no published instrument approaches available.

No aircraft are based at New Jerusalem Airport. The airport has an average of 77 operations per week, all of which are transient. No ser‐ vices are available at the airport.

Calaveras County Airport (owned by the County of Calaveras) is lo‐ cated approximately 25 nautical miles north‐northeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by a single 3,603‐foot run‐ way. There is no ATCT at the airport. One published instrument ap‐ proach is available. There are 49 aircraft based at Calaveras County Airport. The airport has an average of 88 operations per day. Ser‐ vices available include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL), and mi‐ nor aircraft maintenance.

Columbia Airport (owned by the County of Tuolumne) is located ap‐ proximately 25 nautical miles northeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport.

The airport is served by a 4,673‐foot asphalt runway. A 2,607‐foot turf runway is also available. There is no ATCT at the airport. One published instrument approach is available. There are 107 aircraft are based at Columbia Airport. The airport has an average of 126 op‐ erations per day. Services available include aircraft tiedowns, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

Castle Airport (owned by the Merced County Department of CAED) is located approximately 25 nautical miles south‐southeast of Oakdale Municipal Airport. The airport is served by a single 11,802‐foot run‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 135 7 “Height and hazard zoning in
the vicinity of the airport is
regulated by the Stanislaus
County Airport Land Use
Commission.”
way. The airport is equipped with an ATCT, which reported 67,300 annual operations in 2012. There are four published instrument ap‐ proaches available and 76 aircraft are based at Castle Airport. Ser‐ vices available include aircraft hangars, fuel sales (100LL & Jet A), and aircraft maintenance.

AREA LAND USE
Land use surrounding an airport is a critical consideration. It is im‐ portant for the operator of an airport, particularly a governmental body, to protect the airport environment for the safe operations of aircraft and for the safety of people and property on the ground. Sev‐ eral land use planning agencies and ordinances have some jurisdiction over the airport environment.

Land uses surrounding Oakdale Municipal Airport are generally agri‐ cultural, with some rural residential uses. A few of these residential uses are located along Laughlin Road, which is the access road to the airport. The land surrounding the airport is currently zoned for agri‐ cultural uses. It is recommended the land uses surrounding the air‐ port remain in an agricultural designation. In addition, lands which underneath the approach patterns should remain and be encouraged to develop in a manner which will not concentrate larger groups of people.

HEIGHT AND HAZARD ZONING
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has the authority to regu‐ late the flight of aircraft but only has limited authority to insure that the areas surrounding airports are free of hazards. Thus, the respon‐ sibility for insuring that areas surrounding airports are free from haz‐ ards is left to the local governing authorities.

Height and hazard zoning in the vicinity of the air‐ port is regulated by the Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Commission. Specific zones, based on the
14 CFR Part 77 airspace plan, have been established
in order to regulate the height of objects in the vicin‐ ity of the airport and for the use of land surrounding
the airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 136 8 AIRPORT FACILITIES
Airport facilities can be functionally classified into two broad catego‐ ries: airside and landside. The airside category includes those facili‐ ties directly associated with aircraft operations. The landside catego‐ ry includes those facilities necessary to provide a safe transition from surface to air transportation and support aircraft servicing, storage, maintenance, and operational safety.

AIRSIDE FACILITIES
Airside facilities include runways, taxiways, airfield lighting, and navi‐ gational aids. Airside facilities are identified on Exhibit B. Table D summarizes airside facility data at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

TABLE D
Airside Facilities Data
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Runway 10‐28
Runway Length
Runway Width
3,013’
75’
Runway Surface Material
Condition
Asphalt
Good
Pavement Markings Non‐Precision
Runway Load‐Bearing Strength (lbs.)
Single Wheel Type Landing Gear (S) 20,000
Runway Lighting MIRL
Taxiway Lighting MITL
Approach Aids
PAPI‐2L (Runway 28)
VASI‐2L (Runway 10)
REIL (Runway 10‐28)
Instrument Approach Procedures
RNAV ‐ GPS (Runway 10‐28)
VOR‐A
Weather or Navigational Aids
Segmented Circle & Lighted Wind Cone
Rotating Beacon
GPS – Global Positioning System
MIRL – Medium Intensity Runway Lighting
MITL – Medium Intensity Taxiway Lighting
PAPI – Precision Approach Path Indicator
REIL – Runway End Identification Lights
RNAV – Area Navigation
VASI – Visual Approach Slope Indicator
VOR – Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range
Source: Airport Facility Directory; Southwest U.S. (March 7, 2013).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 137 Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’) Blast Pad Holding Apron
Holding Apron
Gate
REILS
VASI
A 30’
B West Apron
Lighted Windcone,
Segmented Circle, and
Tetrahedron
C Taxiway A
D
E
F
Transient
Apron
Airport Beacon
Closed Taxiway
Gate
Gate
Gate
40’
40’
30’
30’
30’
150’
30’ Blast Pad
REILS
PAPI
South Main
Ca
n
a
l
South Main
Canal

South Main
Ca
n
a
l
Wren Rd.

Laughlin Rd.

Exhibit B

AIRFIELD FACILITIES
12-MP-04-B-05/08/12
NORTH
0 300 600

SCALE IN FEET
Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
Airport Property Line
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 138
9 Runway/Taxiway System
Oakdale Municipal Airport is served by a single asphalt runway.

Runway 10‐28, which measures 3,013 feet long and 75 feet wide, is oriented in an east‐west manner. The runway has pavement strength of 20,000 pounds single wheel type landing gear (S). S refers to the design of certain aircraft landing gear which has a single wheel on each main landing gear strut. The difference in runway end elevations for Runway 10‐28 is 12.5 feet, which results in a 0.004 runway gradi‐ ent (elevation difference between runway high and low points divided by the length of the runway).

Runway 10‐28 is served by full length parallel Taxiway A, which is lo‐ cated 150 feet north of the runway centerline. Taxiway A has six con‐ necting taxiways. Taxiways A, D, E, and F each have a width of 30 feet, while Taxiways B and C have a width of 40 feet.

Pavement Markings
Pavement markings aid in the movement of aircraft along airport sur‐ faces and identify closed or hazardous areas on the airport. The non‐ precision markings on Runway 10‐28 identify the runway designa‐ tions, centerline, touchdown point, and aircraft holding positions.

Taxiway and apron centerline markings are provided to assist pilots in maintaining proper clearance from pavement edges and objects near the taxiway/taxilane edges. Pavement markings also identify aircraft tiedown positions and aircraft holding positions.

Airfield Lighting
Airfield lighting systems extend an airport’s usefulness into periods of darkness and/or poor visibility. A variety of lighting systems are in‐ stalled at the airport for this purpose. These lighting systems, catego‐ rized by function, are summarized as follows:

Identification Lighting: The location of the airport at night is universal‐ ly identified by a rotating beacon. The rotating beacon projects two beams of light, one white and one green, 180 degrees apart. The ro‐ tating beacon at Oakdale Municipal Airport is located atop a metal tower adjacent to the Sierra West Hangar.

Runway and Taxiway Lighting: Runway and taxiway lighting utilizes light fixtures placed near the edge of the pavement to define the lat‐ eral limits of the pavement. This lighting is essential for safe opera‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 139 10 tions during night and/or times of low visibility in order to maintain safe and efficient access to and from the runway and aircraft parking areas.

Runway 10‐28 is equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). These are lights set atop a fixture that is approximately 30 inches above the ground. The light fixtures are frangible, meaning that if one is struck by an object, such as an aircraft wheel, they can easily break away, thus limiting the potential damage to an aircraft.

Medium intensity taxiway lighting (MITL) is installed along Taxiway A and its associated connecting taxiways. These lights are mounted on the same type of structure as runway lights.

Visual Approach Lighting: Common visual approach aids include visu‐ al approach slope indicator (VASI) lights and precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lights. VASIs are a staggered set of light boxes locat‐ ed to the side of the runway, and PAPIs are a set of non‐staggered light boxes located to the side of the runway approximately 1,000 feet from the run‐way threshold. When interpreted by pilots, both VASIs and PAPIs give them an indication of being above, below, or on the correct descent path to the runway. Two‐box systems are common for runways serving small aircraft. Runways utilized by faster jet air‐ craft are typically equipped with four‐box systems. The standard is for VASIs and PAPIs to be set to the left side of the runway. The ap‐ proach end of Runway 28 is equipped with a two‐box PAPI (PAPI‐2L), while the approach end of Runway 10 is equipped with a two‐box VA‐ SI (VASI‐2L).

Runway End Identification Lights (REILs): A REIL system has been in‐ stalled at each end of Runway 10‐28. REILs provide rapid and posi‐ tive identification of the approach ends of a runway. A REIL consists of two synchronized flashing lights, located laterally on each side of the runway threshold, facing the approaching aircraft.

Airfield Signs: Airfield identification signs assist pilots in identifying their location on the airfield and direct them to their desired location.

Lighted airfield signs are located on Runway 10‐28, Taxiway A, air‐ craft hold positions, taxiway intersections, and at the intersection of the connecting taxiways and runways.

Pilot‐Controlled Lighting: With the pilot‐controlled lighting (PCL) sys‐ tem, pilots can turn on the airfield lights from their aircraft through a series of clicks of their radio transmitter. The Runway 10‐28 MIRL and Taxiway A MITL systems are capable of being activated via PCL.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 140 11 Weather Facilities
The airport is equipped with a lighted wind cone, which provides pi‐ lots with information about wind conditions, and a segmented circle, which provides traffic pattern information to pilots. The lighted wind cone and segmented circle are located south of Runway 10‐28, at mid‐ field.

Navigational Aids
Navigational aids are electronic devices that transmit radio frequen‐ cies, which pilots of properly equipped aircraft can translate into point‐to‐point guidance and position information. The types of elec‐ tronic navigational aids available for aircraft operating in the vicinity of Oakdale Municipal Airport include the nondirectional beacon (NDB), the very high frequency omnidirectional range (VOR) facility, and the global positioning system (GPS).

The NDB transmits nondirectional signals whereby the pilot of an air‐ craft, equipped with direction‐finding equipment, can determine their bearing to and from the radio beacon in order to track to the beacon station. The Tracy NDB is located approximately 31 nautical miles east‐southeast of the airport.

A VOR, in general, provides azimuth readings to pilots of properly equipped aircraft transmitting a radio signal at every degree to pro‐ vide 360 individual navigational courses. Frequently, distance meas‐ uring equipment (DME) is combined with a VOR facility (VOR/DME) to provide distance as well as direction information to the pilot. Mili‐ tary tactical air navigation aids (TACANs) and civil VORs are common‐ ly combined to form a VORTAC. The VORTAC provides distance and direction information to both civil and military pilots. The Modesto VOR‐DME, located approximately 11 nautical miles southeast of the airport, can be utilized by pilots flying to or from the airport.

GPS is an additional navigational aid for pilots. GPS was initially de‐ veloped by the United States Department of Defense for military navi‐ gation around the world. GPS differs from VOR in that pilots are not required to navigate using a specific ground‐based facility. GPS uses satellites placed in orbit around the earth that transmit electronic ra‐ dio signals, which pilots of properly equipped aircraft use to deter‐ mine altitude, speed, and other navigational information. With GPS, pilots can navigate directly to any airport in the country and are not required to navigate using a ground‐based navigational facility.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 141 12 “Utilizing either GPS
approach, a properly
equipped aircraft can land
at the airport with
300‐foot cloud ceilings and
one‐mile visibility …”
Instrument Approach Procedures
Instrument approach procedures are a series of predetermined ma‐ neuvers established by the FAA using electronic navigational aids that assist pilots in locating and landing at an airport during low visibility and cloud ceiling conditions.

Visibility minimums define the horizontal distance that the pilot must be able to see to complete the approach. Cloud ceilings define the lowest level a cloud layer (defined in feet above the ground) can be situated for a pilot to complete the approach. If the observed visibility or cloud ceilings are below the prescribed minimums, the pilot cannot complete the instrument approach. There are currently three pub‐ lished instrument approaches to Oakdale Municipal Airport: GPS Runway 10, GPS Runway 28, and VOR‐A.

The GPS approaches provide the airport with the
lowest minimums. Utilizing either GPS approach, a properly equipped aircraft can land at the airport with 300‐foot cloud ceilings and one‐mile visibility for aircraft in approach categories A and B.

The GPS approaches can also be utilized as circling approaches, which allows pilots to land on any active
runway at the airport. While providing flexibility for the pilot to land on the runway most closely aligned with the prevailing wind, a cir‐ cling approach will have higher visibility minimums in order to pro‐ vide pilots with sufficient visibility and ground clearance to navigate visually from the approach to the desired runway end for landing.

LANDSIDE FACILITIES
Landside facilities are the ground‐based facilities that support the air‐ craft and pilot/passenger handling functions. These facilities typically include the terminal building, aircraft storage/maintenance hangars, aircraft parking aprons, and support facilities such as fuel storage, au‐ tomobile parking, roadway access, and aircraft rescue and firefighting.

Landside facilities are identified on Exhibit C.

General Aviation Terminal Area
There is no designated general aviation terminal building at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 142 Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) Runway 10-28 (3,013’x75’) A EAA
Box Hangars/
Port-a-Ports
B
Taxiway A
West Apron
C
D
E
T-Hangars
City Hangars
Aircraft
Wash Rack Fuel
Picnic
Area
Pilot’s
Lounge Transient
Apron
Auto
Parking
City Hangar
F
Closed Taxiway
Airport Property Line
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
150
151 110 111 112 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 Exhibit C

EXISTING LANDSIDE FACILITIES
12-MP-04-C-08/08/12
NORTH
0 200 400

SCALE IN FEET
Laughlin Rd.

Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 143
13 Specialty Operators
Sierra West maintains a 6,000 square‐foot hangar located on the north end of the transient apron and provides aircraft maintenance to their own fleet. This structure is approximately 20 years old and has water and electrical power.

Chapter 90 of the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) maintains a 6,000 square‐foot hangar, which is located on the west end of the airfield.

Aircraft Storage Facilities
General aviation facilities at Oakdale Municipal Airport have been de‐ veloped along the north side of the airfield and are depicted on Exhib‐ it C. As shown on the exhibit, several types of hangars are available at the airport. Conventional/executive and box hangars provide multi‐ ple aircraft storage, while T‐hangars and port‐a‐port hangars provide individual aircraft storage. The majority of hangars at Oakdale Munic‐ ipal Airport is privately owned and is built on ground leased from the City.

Aircraft Parking Aprons
As depicted on Exhibit C, there are two aircraft aprons provided at Oakdale Municipal Airport: the west apron and the transient apron.

These two apron areas total approximately 6,900 square yards and provide 20 tiedown spaces.

Fuel Storage Facilities
Fuel services at Oakdale Municipal Airport include a City‐owned and managed 10,000‐gallon fuel tank, which is located near the east end of the airfield, adjacent to the T‐Hangars. AvGas (100LL fuel) is available for purchase at a 24‐hour automated self‐fueling terminal, which ac‐ cepts Visa or Mastercard.

Automobile Parking
Automobile parking at Oakdale Municipal Airport is available in sev‐ eral locations adjacent to the individual hangars.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 144 14 AIRSPACE CHARACTERISTICS
To ensure a safe and efficient airspace environment for all aspects of aviation, the FAA has established an airspace structure that regulates and establishes procedures for aircraft using the National Airspace System. The U.S. airspace structure provides two basic categories of airspace, controlled and uncontrolled, and identifies them as Classes A, B, C, D, E, and G. All aircraft operating within Classes A, B, C, and D airspace must be in contact with the air traffic control facility respon‐ sible for that particular airspace. Class E airspace is controlled air‐ space that encompasses all instrument approach procedures and low‐ altitude federal airways. Only aircraft conducting instrument flights are required to be in contact with air traffic control when operating in Class E airspace. Aircraft conducting visual flights in Class E airspace are not required to be in radio communications with air traffic control facilities. Visual flight can only be conducted if minimum visibility and cloud ceilings exist. Class G airspace is uncontrolled airspace that does not require contact with an air traffic control facility.

Airspace in the vicinity of Oakdale Municipal Airport is depicted on Exhibit D. Class E airspace surrounds the airport, with the floor be‐ ginning at 700 feet above the surface and extending to 18,000 feet mean sea level (MSL).

A number of Victor Airways are present near Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port. Victor Airways are corridors of airspace eight miles wide that extend upward from 1,200 feet above ground level (AGL) to 18,000 feet MSL and extend between VOR navigational facilities. The Victor Airways in the vicinity of the airport emanate from the following facil‐ ities:
 Modesto VOR‐DME (11nm SE)
 Manteca VOR‐DME (18nm W)
 Linden VORTAC (21nm NW)
 El Nido VOR‐DME (37nm SE)

SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
As identified on Exhibit D, the IR203 Military Training Routes (MTR) are located near Oakdale Municipal Airport. These routes are used by military aircraft for training activity and commonly operate at speeds in excess of 250 knots, at altitudes above 10,000 feet MSL. While civil‐ ian aircraft are not restricted in the vicinity of these routes, civilian aircraft are cautioned to remain alert for high speed military jet activi‐ ty.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 145 V 107
V 111
V 109-113-585
V 23
V 549
V 244
IR203
V 332
V 28-113
V 338
V 23
V 585
V 23
V 195
V 109-244
V 113
V 301
IR203
Kingdon Lodi
Airpark
Calaveras CoRasmussen
Westover
Amador Co
Columbia
Pine
Mountain
Lake
Turlock
Castle
Merced/
Macready
Chowchilla
Lodi
Franklin
Stockton
Metro
Manteca

VOR-DME
Tracy
NDB
Linden
VORTAC
El Nido

VOR-DME
Modesto

VOR-DME
n
Tracy
R-2531
New Jerusalem
Gustine
HENRY W. COE STATE

WILDERNESS AREA KESTERSON NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE

MERCED NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE

SAN LUIS NATIONAL

WILDLIFE REFUGE
Modesto CityCounty Airport
V 109-113-585
V 111
V 107
V 301
10 T 259
Oakdale
Airport
Exhibit D

VICINITY AIRSPACE
Airport with hard-surfaced runways
1,500' to 8,069' in length
Airports with hard-surfaced runways
greater than 8,069' or some multiple
runways less than 8,069'
VORTAC
Non-Directional Radiobeacon (NDB)

VOR-DME
Compass Rose
Source: San Francisco Sectional Chart, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 03/2012 - 08/2012 Class D Airspace
Class E Airspace
Class E Airspace with Floor
700 ft. or greater above surface
Victor Airways
Military Training Routes
Restricted Airspace

NOT TO SCALE
NORTH
Chowchilla LEGEND
12MP04-D-6/19/12
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 146 15 A Restricted Area (R‐2531) is also depicted on Exhibit D, approxi‐ mately 35nm west of Oakdale Municipal Airport. Restricted areas de‐ note the existence of unusual, often invisible, hazards to aircraft such as artillery firing, aerial gunnery, or guided missiles. Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants.

California is also home to numerous national parks, forests, and wild‐ life areas. Because the government regards these areas as noise‐ sensitive, many of their boundaries are marked on aeronautical charts. Pilots are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet AGL when over these areas.

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
There is no ATCT at Oakdale Municipal Airport; therefore, no formal terminal air traffic control services are available for aircraft landing or departing the airport. Aircraft operating in the vicinity of the airport are not required to file any type of flight plan or to contact any air traf‐ fic control facility unless they are entering airspace where contact is mandatory. The common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) is used by pilots to obtain airport information and advise other aircraft of their position in the traffic pattern and their intentions.

Oakdale Municipal Airport is located within the jurisdiction of the Oakland Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). The Rancho Mur‐ rieta Flight Service Station (FSS) provides additional weather data and other pertinent information to pilots on the ground and enroute.

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES
Oakdale Municipal Airport is situated at 237 feet MSL. The traffic pat‐ tern altitude for all aircraft at the airport is 1,000 feet above airfield elevation (1,237 feet MSL). Runway 10‐28 utilizes a left‐hand traffic pattern.

SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Socioeconomic characteristics are collected and examined to derive an understanding of the dynamics of growth within the study area.

This information assists in determining aviation service level re‐ quirements, as well as forecasting the number of based aircraft and aircraft activity at the airport. Aviation forecasts are typically related to the population base, economic strength of the region, and the abil‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 147 16 “The County is increasingly
a mix of urban, rural, and
suburban communities, …”
ity of the region to sustain a strong economic base over an extended period of time.

POPULATION
Historical population totals, which were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, are presented in Table E. According to the U.S. Census Bu‐ reau, the State of California had more than 33.8 million residents in 2000. This is an increase of nearly 4.1 million residents since 1990, which represents an average annual growth rate of 1.3 percent. Much of California’s population is concentrated in limited areas around ma‐ jor cities.

Population totals for Stanislaus County and the City of Oakdale were also examined. Stanislaus County only represents a small portion of California’s overall population. However, the historical rate of popula‐ tion growth has been somewhat greater than that experienced statewide and the city’s growth rate has outpaced both the county and the state for the past two decades.

Stanislaus County and the entire San Joaquin Valley (comprised of eight counties, including Stanislaus) is one of the fastest growing re‐ gions in California. The population in the San Joaquin Valley has surged due to the demand for housing within commuting distance of the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento, and Los Angeles.

As the population of Stanislaus County has grown, the form of development and use of land have changed. The
County is increasingly a mix of urban, rural, and subur‐ ban communities, with the bulk of the population growth occurring in low density neighborhoods. However, agricul‐ tural acreage still dominates the County’s landscape.

TABLE E
Historical Population
Area 1990 2000 2010
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(1990‐2000)
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(2000‐2010)
Oakdale
Stanislaus Co.

California
12,000
370,500
29,760,000
15,500
447,000
33,871,600
20,700
514,500
37,254,000

2.6%

1.9%

1.3%

2.9%

1.4%

1.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

Population projections for the forecast period are presented in Table F. These projections were obtained from the Demographic Research Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 148 17 Unit, California Department of Finance. According to the study, Stani‐ slaus County’s population is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent over the planning period, totaling approximately 684,400 residents by 2032. California’s population is expected to grow at a slightly lower rate (0.9 percent) during the same period, to‐ taling approximately 45.2 million residents by 2032. Population pro‐ jections for individual cities in California were not available.

TABLE F
Forecast Population
Area 2012 2017 2022 2032
Avg. Annual
Growth Rate
(2012‐2032)
Stanislaus Co.

California
519,900
37,678,600
558,300
39,611,100
598,800
41,569,100
684,400
45,268,800

1.4%

0.9%
Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance (May 2012).

EMPLOYMENT
Analysis of a community’s employment base can provide valuable in‐ sight to the overall well‐being of the community. In most cases, the community makeup and health is significantly impacted by the availa‐ bility of jobs, variety of employment opportunities, and types of wages provided by local employers. Civilian labor force data, which was ob‐ tained from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, is presented in Table G.

TABLE G
Civilian Labor Force Data
1990 2000 2012
Stanislaus County
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
180,600
159,100
21,500

11.9%
207,800
191,600
16,200

7.8%
236,100
195,200
40,900

17.3%
State of California
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
15,020,200
13,981,700
1,038,500

6.9%
17,017,200
16,216,100
801,100

4.7%
18,359,800
16,511,800
1,848,000

10.1%
United States
Civilian Labor Force
Employment
Unemployment
Unemployment Rate
125,840,000
118,793,000
7,047,000

5.6%
142,583,000
136,891,000
5,692,000

4.0%
155,779,000
144,039,000
11,741,000

7.5%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

As shown in the table, the United States and the State of California have current unemployment rates of 7.5 percent and 10.1 percent, re‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 149 18 spectively. Meanwhile, the county’s current unemployment rate is at an all time high of 17.3 percent. The unemployment rates for all three areas are practically double what they were in 2000. These high un‐ employment rates can mainly be attributed to the current economic crisis.

Table H presents the major employers in Stanislaus County, several of which utilize Oakdale Municipal Airport. This list was compiled from the California Labor Market Information (LMI). As shown in the table, the county’s principal industries include government, wineries, and medical/healthcare.

Although only a small percentage of the workforce is directly em‐ ployed by farms, other employment sectors, such as food manufactur‐ ing, transportation, and warehousing, employ a considerable portion of the workforce and are directly tied to the agriculture industry.

While the agricultural industry will continue to be the leading em‐ ployer both directly and indirectly, the fastest growing sector is cur‐ rently the medical/healthcare industry.

TABLE H
Major Employers
Stanislaus County
Employer Name Location Industry
Alcott Ridge Vineyards
Alliance Worknet
Bronco Wine Co.

Carlo Rossi Winery
Con Agra Foods Inc
County of Stanislaus
Del Monte Foods
Doctors Medical Center
E&J Gallo Winery
Ecco Domani Winery
Emanuel Medical Center
Fairbanks Cellars
Foster Farms
Frito‐Lay Inc.

Memorial Hospital
Modesto Bee
Oak Valley Hospital
Patterson Vegetable Co. LLC
Stanislaus Co. Community Svc.

Stanislaus Co. Community
Stanislaus Co. Office
Stanislaus Co. Welfare Dept.

Storer Tahoe‐Reno
Turlock Irrigation District
Zabaco Winery
Modesto
Modesto
Ceres
Modesto
Oakdale
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Modesto
Modesto
Oakdale
Patterson
Turlock
Modesto
Patterson
Modesto
Modesto
Turlock
Modesto
Vineyards
County Government
Wholesale Wine
Wineries
Canning
County Government
Canning
Medical/Healthcare
Wineries
Wineries
Medical/Healthcare
Wineries
Poultry Processing Plant
Potato Chips
Medical/Healthcare
Newspapers
Medical/Healthcare
Frozen Food Processors
County Government
County Government
County Government
County Government
Burglar Alarm Systems
Electric Companies
Wineries
Source: California Labor Market Information (2012).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 150 19 “The FAA forecasts were
based upon a 2.5 percent
annual average growth in
GDP from federal fiscal
year 2012 through 2033.”

NATIONAL AVIATION TRENDS AND FORECASTS
The forecasts developed for the airport must consider national, re‐ gional, and local aviation trends. The following section describes the trends in aviation. This information is utilized both in statistical anal‐ ysis and to aid the forecast preparer in making any manual adjust‐ ments to the forecasts as necessary. The national aviation forecast in‐ formation is primarily sourced from the FAA Aerospace Forecast: Fis‐ cal Years 2013‐2033.

NATIONAL TRENDS
The aviation industry in the United States has experienced an event‐ filled decade. Since the turn of the century, the industry has faced im‐ pacts of the events of September 11, 2001, scares from pandemics such as SARS, the bankruptcy of five network air carriers, all‐time high fuel prices, and a serious economic downturn with global ramifi‐ cations. The Bureau of Economic Research has determined that the worst economic recession in the post‐World War II era began in De‐ cember 2007 and lasted until mid‐2009. Eight of the world’s top 10 economies were in recession by January 2009.

As the recession began, unemployment in the United States was at 5.0 percent. While it grew through 2008, unemployment intensified in 2009 until peaking at 10.1 percent in October, although the recession officially ended in June of that year. As of the end of 2011, unem‐ ployment stood at 8.7 percent and by the end of 2012, the unemploy‐ ment rate was still high at 7.7 percent.

This recession did not face the high inflationary environment of the recession in the early 1980s or the high‐energy costs of the mid‐1970s recession. While recessions during the post‐war era have averaged 10 months in duration, this one lasted 19 months. Continued levels of high debt, a weak housing market, and tight credit are expected to keep the recovery modest by most standards. The resolution of those factors will determine the future path of the recovery.

The nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) is the pri‐ mary measure of overall economic growth. GDP
growth rate in fiscal year 2012 was 2.2 percent, reas‐ suring concerns about the possibility of a double‐dip recession. GDP growth did, however, soften in the 4th quarter of 2012 as uncertainty over the “fiscal cliff” re‐ duced demand. The FAA forecasts were based upon a

2.5 percent annual average growth in GDP from federal fiscal year 2012 through 2033.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 151 20 “The active general aviation
fleet is projected to increase at
an average annual rate of 0.5
percent through 2033, …”
Economic growth on the global scale is expected to be higher, with emerging markets in Asia/Pacific and Latin America leading the way.

The global GDP was projected to grow at an average of 3.2 percent over the 20‐year forecast period.

GENERAL AVIATION TRENDS
Following more than a decade of decline, the general aviation industry was revitalized with the passage of the General Aviation Revitalization Act in 1994, which limits the liability on general aviation aircraft to 18 years from the date of manufacture. This legislation sparked an inter‐ est to renew the manufacture of general aviation aircraft due to the reduction in product liability, as well as renewed optimism for the in‐ dustry. The high cost of product liability insurance had been a major factor in the decision by many American aircraft manufacturers to slow or discontinue the production of general aviation aircraft.

General aviation activity trends tend to closely match national eco‐ nomic trends. From 2008 through 2012, total operations by general aviation aircraft have declined annually.

The FAA forecasts a return to growth in 2013 with an average annual growth rate of 0.5 percent through 2033.

The FAA forecasts the fleet and hours flown for single‐engine piston aircraft, multi‐engine piston aircraft, turboprops, business jets, piston and turbine helicopters, light sport, experimental, and others (gliders and balloons). The FAA forecasts “active aircraft,” not total aircraft.

An active aircraft is one that is flown at least one hour during the year.

Exhibit E presents the historical and forecast U.S. active general avia‐ tion aircraft.

After growing rapidly for most of the decade, the demand for business jet aircraft has slowed over the past few years as the industry has been hard hit by the economic recession. However, recent shipment activity indicates a cautiously optimistic outlook. The FAA forecast calls for robust growth in the long‐term, driven by higher corporate profits and continued concerns about safety, security, and flight de‐ lays. Overall, business aviation is projected to outpace person‐ al/recreational use.

The active general aviation fleet is projected to increase at an average annual rate of 0.5 percent
through 2033, growing from a 2012 estimate of
220,670 to 246,375 in 2033. The turbine fleet,
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 152 150
175
200
225
250
Aircraft (in thousands)
1990 1995
Historical Forecast
2000 2005 2010
‘12
2015
275
2020 2025 2030
Source: FAA Aerospace Forecasts, Fiscal Years 2013-2033.

Notes: An active aircraft is one that has a current registration and was flown at least one hour during the calendar year.
08MP04-E-3/06/13
Exhibit E
U.S. ACTIVE GENERAL AVIATION

AIRCRAFT FORECASTS
2013 2018 2023 2028 2033

FIXED WING
Piston
Single Engine 135,005 131,095 128,200 127,115 129,040
Multi-Engine 15,530 15,165 14,605 14,085 13,650
Turbine
Turboprop 9,830 10,650 11,595 12,665 13,740
Turbojet 12,230 14,420 16,895 20,285 24,620

ROTORCRAFT
Piston 3,865 4,400 4,885 5,415 5,970
Turbine 7,130 8,415 9,705 11,110 12,585

EXPERIMENTAL
24,750 26,250 27,745 29,370 30,980

SPORT AIRCRAFT
7,075 7,890 8,680 9,460 10,245
OTHER
5,670 5,635 5,605 5,575 5,545
TOTAL 221,085 223,920 227,915 235,080 246,375
U.S. Active General Aviation Aircraft
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 153 21 including helicopters, is forecast to grow annually at 2.8 percent, with the jet portion increasing at 3.5 percent annually.

Piston‐powered aircraft are projected to decrease from the 2010 total of 159,007 through 2028, with declines in both single‐ and multi‐ engine fixed wing aircraft, but growth in piston helicopters. Beyond 2028, active piston‐powered aircraft are forecast to increase to 148,660 in 2033, still below the current number in the fleet. Fixed‐ wing single and multi‐engine piston aircraft are forecast to decline annually at 0.2 percent and 0.6 percent, respectively.

The FAA began tracking the light sport aircraft segment of the general aviation fleet in 2005. At the end of 2011, a total of 6,645 aircraft were estimated in this category. By 2033, a total of 10,245 light sport aircraft are forecast to be in the fleet.

AVIATION FORECAST METHODOLOGY
The development of aviation forecasts proceeds through both analyti‐ cal and judgmental processes. A series of mathematical relationships is tested to establish statistical logic and rationale for projected growth. However, the judgment of the forecast analyst, based upon professional experience, knowledge of the aviation industry, and as‐ sessment of the local situation is important in the final determination of the preferred forecast.

Beyond five years, the predictive reliability of the forecasts can dimin‐ ish. Therefore, it is prudent for the airport to update the forecasts, re‐ assess the assumptions originally made, and revise the forecasts based on the current airport and industry conditions. Facility and fi‐ nancial planning usually require at least a 10‐year preview, since it of‐ ten takes several years to complete a major facility development pro‐ gram. However, it is important to use forecasts which do not overes‐ timate revenue‐generating capabilities or understate demand for fa‐ cilities needed to meet public (user) needs.

A wide range of factors are known to influence the aviation industry and can have significant impacts on the extent and nature of activity occurring in both the local and national markets. Technological ad‐ vances in aviation have historically altered and will continue to change the growth rates in aviation demand over time. A recent ex‐ ample is the substantial growth in the production and delivery of business jet aircraft, which resulted in a growth rate that far exceeded expectations. Such changes are difficult to predict, but over time rea‐ sonable growth trends can be identified. Using a broad spectrum of demographic, economic, and industry data, forecasts for Oakdale Mu‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 154 22 nicipal Airport have been developed. Several standard statistical methods have been employed to generate various projections of avia‐ tion demand.

Time series/trend line projections are probably the simplest and most familiar of the forecasting techniques. By fitting growth curves to historical demand data, then extending them into the future, a basic trend line projection is produced. A basic assumption of this tech‐ nique is that outside factors will continue to affect aviation demand in much the same manner as in the past. As broad as this assumption may be, the time series projection does serve as a reliable benchmark for comparing other projections.

Correlation analysis provides a measure of a direct relationship be‐ tween two separate sets of historic data. Should there be a reasonable correlation between the data, further evaluation using regression analysis may be employed.

Regression analysis measures the statistical relationship between dependent and independent variables, yielding a “correlation coeffi‐ cient.” The correlation coefficient (Pearson’s “r”) measures associa‐ tion between the changes in a dependent variable and independent variable(s). If the r‐squared (r2) value (coefficient determination) is greater than 0.90, it indicates good predictive reliability. A value be‐ low 0.90 may be used with the understanding that the predictive reli‐ ability is lower.

Market share analysis involves a historical review of airport activity as a percentage, or share, of a larger regional, state, or national avia‐ tion market. A historical market share trend is determined, providing an expected market share for the future. These shares are then multi‐ plied by the forecasts of the larger geographical area to produce a market share projection. This method has the same limitations as trend line projections, but can provide a useful check on the validity of other forecasting techniques.

Utilizing these statistical methods, available existing forecasts, and analyst expertise, forecasts of aviation demand for Oakdale Municipal Airport have been developed. The remainder of this chapter presents the aviation demand forecasts and includes activity in two broad cate‐ gories: based aircraft and annual operations.

RISKS TO THE FORECASTS
While the FAA is confident that its forecasts for aviation demand and activity can be achieved, this hinges on a number of factors, including Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 155 23 the strength of the global economy, security (including the threat of international terrorism), and the level of oil prices. Higher oil prices could lead to further shifts in consumer spending away from aviation, dampening a recovery in air transport demand. In the long term, the FAA foresees a competitive and profitable industry characterized by increasing demand for air travel and airfares growing more slowly than inflation.

FORECASTS OF AVIATION DEMAND
An important factor in facility planning involves a definition of de‐ mand that may reasonably be expected to occur during the useful life of the facility’s key components. For Oakdale Municipal Airport, this involves projecting potential aviation demand for a 20‐year timeframe. In this report, forecasts of annual operations, based air‐ craft, and based aircraft fleet mix will serve as the basis for facility planning.

The resulting forecast may be used for several purposes, including fa‐ cility needs assessments, airfield capacity evaluation, and environ‐ mental evaluations. The forecasts will be reviewed and approved by the FAA to ensure that they are reasonable projections of aviation ac‐ tivity. The intent is to permit the City of Oakdale to make the neces‐ sary planning adjustments to ensure the facility meets projected de‐ mands in an efficient and cost‐effective manner.

Because aviation activity can be affected by many influences at the lo‐ cal, regional, and national levels, it is important to remember that forecasts are to serve only as guidelines, and planning must remain flexible enough to respond to unforeseen facility needs.

BASED AIRCRAFT
The number of based aircraft is the most basic indicator of general aviation demand. By first developing a forecast of based aircraft, the growth of aviation activities at the airport can be projected. Aircraft basing at the airport is somewhat dependent upon the nature and de‐ gree of aircraft ownership in the local service area. As a result, air‐ craft registrations in the area were reviewed and forecast first.

Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Table K outlines the historic registered aircraft in Stanislaus County since 2002. This information was obtained from records of the FAA’s Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 156 24 Aircraft Registry. According to the FAA, there were 409 aircraft regis‐ tered in Stanislaus County in 2000. This number has since decreased, with 363 registered aircraft reported in the county in 2012. This rep‐ resents an annual average growth rate of ‐1.2 percent. There are no recently prepared forecasts of registered aircraft to examine and compare. As a result, a projection of county registrations was devel‐ oped for this study.

TABLE K
Historical Registered Aircraft
Stanislaus County
Year
Registered
Aircraft
Annual %
Change
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
409
427
439
454
448
428
424
394
389
370
363
‐

4.4%

2.8%

3.4%
‐1.3%
‐4.5%
‐0.9%
‐7.1%
‐1.3%
‐4.9%
‐1.9%
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry.

Due to the fluctuation in the number of registered aircraft over the past ten years, time‐series and regression analyses yielded correlation coefficients too low to have any predictive reliability. Therefore, none of the time‐series or regression analyses were carried forward in this study, and other methods were used to provide projections of regis‐ tered aircraft.

The first method considered the county’s market share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft. This market share analysis compared the county’s aircraft ownership trends versus national aircraft ownership trends. As evidenced in Table L, Stanislaus County’s share of U.S. ac‐ tive general aviation aircraft has fluctuated between a high of 0.21% in 2004 to a low of 0.16% for 2012. A constant market share projec‐ tion of 0.16% was applied to the forecast years and yields 401 regis‐ tered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

Due to the historical fluctuation of registered aircraft, an average market share projection was also developed. Over the past five years, the county’s share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft averaged

0.17%. Applying this percentage to the forecast years yields 414 reg‐ istered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 157 25 TABLE L
Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Stanislaus County
Year
Stanislaus Co.

Registered
Aircraft
U.S. Active
GA Aircraft
% of U.S.

Active
GA Aircraft
Stanislaus Co.

Population
AC Per
1,000
Residents
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
409
427
439
454
448
428
424
394
389
370
363
211,500
211,300
209,600
224,400
221,900
231,600
228,700
223,900
223,400
220,800
220,700

0.19%

0.20%

0.21%

0.20%

0.18%

0.19%

0.18%

0.17%

0.16%
459,800
466,300
472,900
479,600
486,400
493,200
500,200
507,300
514,500
517,200
519,900

0.89 0.92

0.93 0.95

0.92 0.87

0.85 0.78

0.76 0.72

0.70 Constant Market Share Projection of U.S. Active GA Aircraft 2017
2022
2032
367
373
401
223,300
227,000
243,700

0.16%

0.16%
Average Market Share Projection of U.S. Active GA Aircraft 2017
2022
2032
380
386
414
223,300
227,000
243,700

0.17%

0.17%
Constant Ratio Projection Per 1,000 Residents in Stanislaus County (2008‐2012) 2017
2022
2032
390
418
478
558,300
598,800
684,400

0.70 0.70

0.70 Average Ratio Projection Per 1,000 Residents in Stanislaus County (2008‐2012) 2017
2022
2032
424
455
520
558,300
598,800
684,400

0.76 0.76

0.76 Source: Historical Registered Aircraft – FAA; Historical and Forecast U.S. Active GA Aircraft ‐ FAA Aerospace Forecasts, Fiscal Years 2013‐2033 (March 2013); Historical Population – U.S. Census Bureau; Forecast Popula‐ tion – Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance (May 2012).

The population of Stanislaus County has also been used as a compari‐ son with registered aircraft in the county. This forecast method exam‐ ines historical registered aircraft as a ratio of 1,000 residents Stani‐ slaus County. As shown in Table L, the county’s share of U.S. active general aviation aircraft has fluctuated between a high of 0.95 aircraft per 1,000 residents in 2005 to a current low of 0.70 for 2012. A con‐ stant market share projection of 0.70 was applied to the forecast years and yields 363 registered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032.

0.17. Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 158 26 “According to airport records,
there are currently 81 based
aircraft at Oakdale Municipal
Airport, …”
Table M and Exhibit F summarize the registered aircraft forecasts for Stanislaus County. The selected planning forecast is an average of the four newly developed forecasts and results in 450 registered aircraft in Stanislaus County by 2032. This is an increase of 87 aircraft in the county over the planning period, which represents an average annual growth rate of 1.1 percent.

TABLE M
Summary of Registered Aircraft Forecasts
Stanislaus County
2012 2017 2022 2032
Market Share of U.S. Active GA Aircraft
Constant Market Share Projection
Average Market Share Projection (2008‐2012)
363
367
380
373
386
401
414
Registered Aircraft Per 1,000 Residents (Stanislaus Co.) Constant Ratio Projection
Average Ration Projection (2008‐2012)
390
424
418
455
478
520
Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR) 390 410 450
Based Aircraft Forecasts
According to the FAA 5010 Form, there are currently 61 aircraft based at Oakdale Municipal Airport for 2012. Historical annualized based aircraft totals were not available for this study; therefore, time‐series and regression analyses could not be performed.

The based aircraft forecast is a function of the
registered aircraft forecast completed above.

Table N presents the airport’s based aircraft
market share of registered aircraft in Stani‐
slaus County. According to airport records,
there are currently 81 based aircraft at
Oakdale Municipal Airport, which accounts for 22.3 percent of the air‐ craft registered in Stanislaus County. Because no historical data of based aircraft was available, only a constant market share projection was developed. This constant market share forecast yields 100 based aircraft by 2032.

TABLE N
Based Aircraft Market Share Forecast
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year
Oakdale
Based Aircraft
Stanislaus County
Registered Aircraft
Market Share
of Reg. AC
2012 81 363 22.3%
Constant Market Share Projection of Registered Aircraft (Stanislaus County) 2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
390
410
450

22.3%

22.3%
Source: Current Based Aircraft – Airport Records; Current Registered Aircraft – FAA.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 159 100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2017 2022 2025 20302032
‘11
2 11
2010
‘06‘07‘08‘09
2005
‘03‘04
2002

REGISTERED AIRCRAFT
YEAR

HISTORICAL FORECASTS R
Exhibit F

REGISTERED AIRCRAFT

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-F-6/19/12
0302032
Market Share of U.S. Active Aircraft
- Constant Market Share
- Average Market Share (2008-2012)
Registered Aircraft per 1,000 Residents (Stanislaus Co.) - Constant Ratio Projection
- Average Ratio Projection (2008-2012)
Select Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR*)
LEGEND
*Average Annual Growth Rate
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 160 27 “According to airport records,
the current mix of aircraft based
at the airport consists of 73
single engine aircraft and eight
multi‐engine aircraft.”
Previous forecasts of based aircraft were also examined for this study.

Forecasts included in the 1996 Airport Master Plan used a base num‐ ber of 55 based aircraft in 1995 and projected 80 based aircraft by 2015. This represents an average annual growth rate of 1.9 percent.

The most recent FAA TAF, which was published in January 2013, was also examined. The FAA TAF used a base year of 2012, with an esti‐ mated 63 based aircraft. The FAA TAF shows a flat line forecast through 2040.

Table P and Exhibit G summarize the based aircraft forecasts for Oakdale Municipal Airport. The selected planning forecast is the con‐ stant market share forecast developed by Coffman Associates. This forecast yields 100 based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport by 2032, which represents a 1.1 percent average annual growth rate.

TABLE P
Summary of Based Aircraft Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport
2012 2017 2022 2032
1996 Airport Master Plan
81 831 N/A N/A
2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecast 63 63 63
Constant Market Share of Reg. Aircraft (Stanislaus Co.) Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR) 87 91 100
1Extrapolated
It is important to note that the actual percentage of area‐wide aircraft that base at Oakdale Municipal Airport in the future will depend on availability of hangars, rental rates, and services offered by airport businesses.

Based Aircraft Fleet Mix
While the total number of general aviation aircraft based at Oakdale Municipal Airport is projected to increase, it is
also important to know the type of aircraft ex‐
pected to base at the airport. This will ensure
the planning of proper facilities in the future.

According to airport records, the current mix
of aircraft based at the airport consists of 73 single engine aircraft and eight multi‐engine
aircraft.

The forecast mix of based aircraft was determined by comparing ex‐ isting and forecast U.S. general aviation fleet trends to the fleet mix at Oakdale Municipal Airport. The national trend in general aviation is toward a greater percentage of larger, more sophisticated aircraft as Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 161 28 part of the national fleet. While an increase in single engine aircraft can be expected, their percentage of the total fleet mix will likely de‐ crease. Meanwhile, the percentage of multi‐engine aircraft is project‐ ed to increase. It could also be expected that Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port’s based aircraft mix will include some jets and helicopters in the future. The fleet mix projections for Oakdale Municipal Airport are presented in Table Q.

TABLE Q
Based Aircraft Fleet Mix
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year Total
Single
Engine
Multi‐
Engine Jets Helicopters
2012 81 73 8 0 0
2012 100.0% 90.1% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0%
2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
76 76
79 11
13 17
0 1
2 0
1 2
Change +19 +6 +9 +2 +2
2017
2022
2032
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

87.0%

84.0%

79.0%

12.0%

14.0%

17.0%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%

0.5%

1.0%

2.0%
Source: Current Fleet Mix – Airport Records.

GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS
General aviation operations are classified as either local or itinerant.

A local operation is a take‐off or landing performed by an aircraft that operates within sight of the airport, or which executes simulated ap‐ proaches or touch‐and‐go operations at the airport. Itinerant opera‐ tions are those performed by aircraft with a specific origin or destina‐ tion away from the airport. Generally, local operations are character‐ ized by training operations. Typically, itinerant operations increase with business and commercial use, since business aircraft are not typ‐ ically used for large scale training activities.

When tower reports are not available, the FAA Statistics and Forecast Branch recommends using the Model for Estimating General Aviation Operations at Non‐Towered Airports (July 2001). This report develops and presents a regression model for estimating general aviation (GA) operations at non‐towered airports. Independent variables used in the equation include airport characteristics (i.e., number of based air‐ craft, number of flight schools, population totals, and geographic loca‐ tion).

While there are currently no flight schools at Oakdale Municipal Air‐ port, several of the flight schools at nearby airports utilize Oakdale Municipal Airport for flight training operations. For this analysis, it was determined that five flight schools from the area utilize Oakdale Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 162 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
2032
‘30
2025
‘22
2020
‘17
2015
‘12
1995 2000 2005 2010

BASED AIRCRAFT
YEAR
110
120
Exhibit G

BASED AIRCRAFT

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-G-6/19/12
1996 Airport Master Plan
2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecast
Constant Market Share of Registered Aircraft (Stanislaus Co.) - Selected Planning Forecast (1.1% AAGR*)
LEGEND
*Average Annual Growth Rate
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 163 29 “ … it is estimated that
flight training accounts for
approximately 27,800 local
operations each year.”
Municipal Airport on a regular basis. Applying this into the equation yields an initial total of 41,600 annual general aviation operations. Of this total, it is estimated that flight training accounts for approximately 27,800 local operations each year.

As shown in Table R, the estimated 41,600 annual general aviation operations equates to 514 operations
per based aircraft. It is important to note that while this is presented as “operations per based aircraft” in the table, this number also includes the training operations performed by aircraft based at surrounding airports.

From this base number, a constant ratio projection was developed and yields 51,400 annual general aviation operations by 2032. This represents an average annual growth rate of 1.1 percent. Due to the extensive number of training operations taking place at Oakdale Mu‐ nicipal Airport, it is estimated that the current operational split is 15 percent itinerant and 85 percent local. This selected planning forecast is presented in Table R.

TABLE R
General Aviation Operations Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year
Based
Aircraft
Itinerant
Operations
Local
Operations
Total
Operations
Ops Per
Based
Aircraft
2012 81 6,200 35,400 41,6001 514
Constant Ratio Projection
2017
2022
2032
87 91
100
6,700
7,000
7,700
38,000
39,700
43,700
44,700
46,700
51,400
514
514
514
12012 Estimate of operations – Derived from Model for Estimating General Aviation Operations at Non‐ Towered Airports, Equation #15, FAA Statistics and Forecast Branch (July 2001).

Previous forecasts were also examined, including those in the 1996 Airport Master Plan and the 2013 FAA Terminal Area Forecasts. How‐ ever, neither of these forecasts takes into consideration the training operations performed at Oakdale Municipal Airport and were there‐ fore not considered reliable.

PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS
Many airport facility needs are related to the level of activity during peak periods. The periods used in developing facility requirements for this study are as follows:

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 164 30  Peak Month – The calendar month when peak activity occurs.  Design Day – The average day in the peak month. This indica‐ tor is derived by dividing the peak month activity by the num‐ ber of days in the month.
 Busy Day – The busy day of a typical week in the peak month.  Design Hour – The peak hour within the design day.

It is important to realize that only the peak month is an absolute peak within the year. Each of the other periods will be exceeded at various times during the year. However, each provides reasonable planning standards that can be applied without overbuilding or being too re‐ strictive.

General Aviation Peaks
Typically, the peak month for general aviation operations represents between 10 and 12 percent of the airport’s annual operations. For this analysis, the peak month was estimated at 12 percent of annual operations, which equates to approximately 5,000 operations for the base year. Forecasts of peak month activity have been developed by applying this percentage to the forecasts of annual operations.

Design day operations were calculated by dividing the total number of operations in the peak month by the number of days in the month.

The design hour is projected as 15 percent of the design day opera‐ tions. Busy day operations were calculated at 15 percent busier than the design day activity. Table S summarizes the general aviation peak activity forecasts.

TABLE S
Peak Period Forecasts
Oakdale Municipal Airport

FORECASTS
2012 2017 2022 2032
General Aviation Operations
Annual
Peak Month (12.0%)
Design Day
Busy Day
Design Hour (15.0%)
41,600
5,000
170
210
25 44,700
5,400
180
220
27 46,700
5,600
190
230
28 51,400
6,200
210
260
31 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 165 31 AIR TAXI OPERATIONS
The total annual operations by aircraft operating under F.A.R. Part 135 (air taxi) have also been examined since a percentage of the local‐ ly based aircraft operate under Part 135. Part 135 operations were estimated at ten percent of itinerant operations, which is typical for general aviation airports of this size. This equates to an estimated 600 air taxi operations for the base year. Table T presents the air taxi operations forecast at Oakdale Municipal Airport. Assuming air taxi operations will continue to account for ten percent of itinerant opera‐ tions, approximately 800 air taxi operations are projected by the end of the planning period.

TABLE T
Air Taxi Operations Forecast
Oakdale Municipal Airport
Year Air Taxi Operations
2012 600
2017
2027
2032
700
700
800
This section has provided forecasts for each sector of aviation demand anticipated over the planning period. A summary of the aviation fore‐ casts developed for Oakdale Municipal Airport is presented on Exhib‐ it H.

In the following section, existing components of the airport are evalu‐ ated so that the capacities of the overall system are identified. Once identified, the existing capacity is compared to the planning horizon milestones to determine where deficiencies currently exist or may be expected to materialize in the future. Once deficiencies in a compo‐ nent are identified, a more specific determination of the appropriate sizing and timing of the new facilities can be made.

PLANNING HORIZONS
An updated set of aviation demand forecasts for Oakdale Municipal Airport has been established. These activity forecasts include based aircraft, fleet mix, annual operations, and peaking characteristics.

With this information, specific components of the airside and landside system can be evaluated to determine their capacity to accommodate future demand.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 166 32 Cost‐effective, efficient, and orderly development of an airport should rely more upon actual demand at an airport than on a time‐based forecast figure. In order to develop a Master Plan that is demand‐ based rather than time‐based, a series of planning horizon milestones have been established that take into consideration the reasonable range of aviation demand projections. The planning horizons are the short term (approximate years 1‐5), the intermediate term (years 6‐ 10), and the long term (years 11‐20).

It is important to consider that the actual activity at the airport may be higher or lower than what the annualized forecast predicts. By planning according to activity milestones, the resultant plan can ac‐ commodate unexpected shifts or changes in the area’s aviation de‐ mand. It is important for the plan to accommodate these changes so that airport officials can respond to unexpected changes in a timely fashion.

The most important reason for utilizing milestones is it allows airport management the flexibility to make decisions and develop facilities according to need generated by actual demand levels. The demand‐ based schedule provides flexibility in development, as development schedules can be slowed or expedited according to demand at any given time over the planning period. The resultant plan provides air‐ port officials with a financially responsible and needs‐based program.

Table V presents the planning horizon milestones at Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport.

TABLE V
Planning Horizon Activity Levels
Oakdale Municipal Airport
2012
Short
Term
Intermediate
Term
Long
Term

ANNUAL OPERATIONS
Itinerant
Air Taxi
General Aviation
Total Itinerant
Local
General Aviation
Total Local
Total Operations
600
6,200
6,800
35,400
35,400
42,200
700
6,700
7,400
38,000
38,000
45,400
700
7,000
7,700
39,700
39,700
47,400
800
7,700
8,500
43,700
43,700
52,200
Based Aircraft 81 87 91 100
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 167 10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
110
2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
Operations
Operations
Based Aircraft
Based Aircraft
Itinerant
Air Taxi 600 700 700 800
General Aviation 6,200 6,700 7,000 7,700
Total Itinerant 6,800 7,400 7,700 8,500
Local
General Aviation 35,400 38,000 39,700 43,700
Total Local 35,400 38,000 39,700 43,700
Total Operations 42,200 45,400 47,400 52,200
Single Engine 73 76 76 79
Multi-Engine 8 11 13 17
Jets 0 0 1 2
Helicopters 0 0 1 2
Total Based Aircraft 81 87 91 100

ANNUAL OPERATIONS

BASED AIRCRAFT

BASE YEAR FORECASTS
CATEGORY 2012 2017 2027 2032
Exhibit H

FORECAST SUMMARY
12MP04-H-11/29/12
2032
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 168 33 FAA DESIGN STANDARDS
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publishes Advisory Circu‐ lar (AC) 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, to guide airport planning. The AC provides guidance on various design elements of an airport in‐ tended to maintain or improve safety at airports. The design stand‐ ards include airport elements such as runways, taxiways, safety areas, and separation distances. According to the AC, “airport planning should consider both the present and potential aviation needs and de‐ mand associated with the airport.” Consideration should be given to planning runway and taxiway locations that will meet future separa‐ tion requirements even if the width, strength, and length must in‐ crease later. Such decisions should be supported by the aviation de‐ mand forecasts and coordinated with the FAA and shown on the Air‐ port Layout Plan (ALP).

FAA AC 150/5300‐13A (Change 1), Airport Design, was published on February 26, 2014. It is intended to replace AC 150/5300‐13A, Air‐ port Design, which was dated September 28, 2012.

The previous Airport Design AC established the design standards based primarily on the Airport Reference Code (ARC). Paragraph 4 defined the ARC as “a coding system used to relate airport design crite‐ ria to the operational and physical characteristics of the airplanes in‐ tended to operate at the airport.”
In the current AC, the definition of the Airport Reference Code (ARC) is found in Paragraph 102.i. and reads, “An airport designation that signifies the airport’s highest Runway Design Code (RDC), minus the third (visibility) component of the RDC. The ARC is used for planning and design only and does not limit the aircraft that may be able to op‐ erate safely on the airport.”
The current Airport Design AC introduces not only the Runway Design Code (RDC), but also the Approach Reference Code (APRC) and the Departure Reference Code (DPRC). The RDC is defined in Paragraph 102.sss as, “A code signifying the design standards to which the runway is to be built.” Paragraph 105.c. indicates that the Aircraft Approach Category (AAC), the Airplane Design Group (ADG), and the approach visibility minimums combine to form the RDC of a particular runway.

These provide the information needed to determine certain design standards that apply.

The APRC and DPRC are defined as, “A code signifying the current op‐ erational capabilities of a runway and associated parallel taxiway.” Like the RDC, the APRC and DPRC are composed of the same three components: the AAC, ADG, and runway visibility minimums. The Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 169 34 RDC, however, is based upon planned development with no opera‐ tional component, while the APRC and DPRC describe the current op‐ erational capabilities of a runway where no special operating proce‐ dures are necessary. The APRC and DPRC for a runway are estab‐ lished based upon the minimum runway to taxiway centerline separa‐ tion.

AIRCRAFT DESIGN STANDARDS
The selection of appropriate FAA design standards for the develop‐ ment and location of airport facilities is based primarily upon the characteristics of the aircraft which are currently using or are ex‐ pected to use the airport. The critical design aircraft is used to define the design parameters for the airport. In most cases, the design air‐ craft is a composite aircraft representing a collection of aircraft classi‐ fied by three parameters: AAC, ADG, and Taxiway Design Group (TDG). In the case of an airport with multiple runways, a design air‐ craft is selected for each runway. The first consideration is the safe operation of aircraft likely to use the airport. Any operation of an air‐ craft that exceeds design criteria of the airport may result in either an unsafe operation or a lesser safety margin; however, it is not the usual practice to base the airport design on an aircraft that uses the airport infrequently.

Planning for future aircraft use is of particular importance since the design standards are used to plan separation distances between facili‐ ties. These future standards must be considered now to ensure that short term development does not preclude the long range potential needs of the airport. Exhibit J summarizes representative design air‐ craft categories.

Runway Design Code
The AAC, ADG, and approach visibility minimums are combined to form the RDC of a particular runway. The RDC provides the infor‐ mation needed to determine certain design standards that apply. The first component, depicted by a letter, is the AAC and relates to aircraft approach speed (operational characteristics). The second component, depicted by a Roman numeral, is the ADG and relates to either the air‐ craft wingspan or tail height (physical characteristics), whichever is most restrictive. The third component relates to the visibility mini‐ mums expressed by runway visual range (RVR) values in feet of 1,200, 1,600, 2,400, and 4,000 when approach minimums are less than one mile. The third component should read “NPI‐1” for runways with a non‐precision instrument approach with visibility minimums be‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 170 A-I
B-I
B-II

A-III, B-III

C-II, D-II

C-III, D-III

C-IV, D-IV
D-V
• Beech Baron 55
• Beech Bonanza
• Cessna 150
• Cessna 172
• Cessna Citation Mustang
• Eclipse 500/550
• Piper Archer
• Piper Seneca
• Beech Baron 58
• Beech King Air 100
• Cessna 402
• Cessna 421
• Piper Navajo
• Piper Cheyenne
• Swearingen Metroliner
• Cessna Citation I (525)
• DHC Dash 7
• DHC Dash 8
• DC-3
• Convair 580
• Fairchild F-27
• ATR 72
• ATP
• Beech 400
• Lear 31, 35, 45, 60
• Israeli Westwind
• Super King Air 200
• Cessna 441
• DHC Twin Otter
• Super King Air 350
• Beech 1900
• Citation Excel (560),
Sovereign (680)
• Falcon 50, 900, 2000
• Citation Bravo (550)
• Embraer 120
• ERJ-90
• Boeing Business Jet
• B-727
• B-737-300, 700, 800
• MD-80, DC-9
• A319, A320
C-III, D-III • ERJ-170
• CRJ 705, 900
• Falcon 7X
• Gulfstream 500,
550, 650
• Global Express, Global 5000
• Q-400
• B-757
• B-767
• C-130 Hercules
• DC-8-70
• MD-11
• B-747-400
• B-777
• B-787
• A-330, A-340
• Cessna Citation X (750)
• Gulfstream 100,
200,300
• Challenger 300/600
• ERJ-135, 140, 145
• CRJ-200/700
• Embraer Regional Jet
• Lockheed JetStar
• Hawker 800
Note: Aircraft pictured is identified in bold type.

C-I, D-I
less than
100,000 lbs.
over
100,000 lbs.

Exhibit J

AIRCRAFT REFERENCE CODES
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 171 35 tween one and three miles and “VIS” for runways designed for visual approach use only. Generally stated, runway standards are related to aircraft approach speed, aircraft wingspan, and/or established or planned instrument approach visibility minimums. Table W presents the RDC parameters.

TABLE W
Runway Design Code Parameters
Aircraft Approach Category (AAC)
Category Approach Speed
A less than 91 knots
B 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots
C 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots
D 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots
E 166 knots or more
Airplane Design Group (ADG)
Group # Tail Height (ft) Wingspan (ft)
I <20 <49
II 20‐<30 49‐<79
III 30‐<45 70‐<118
IV 45‐<60 118‐<171
V 60‐<66 171‐<214
VI 66‐<80 214‐<262
Visibility Minimums
RVR (ft) Flight Visibility Category (statute miles)
VIS 3‐mile or greater visibility minimums
NPI ‐ 1 Lower than 3 miles but not lower than 1‐mile
4,000 Lower than 1‐mile but not lower than ¾‐mile (APV ≥ ¾ but < 1‐mile) 2,400 Lower than ¾‐mile but not lower than ½‐mile (CAT‐I PA) 1,600 Lower than ½‐mile but not lower than ¼‐mile (CAT‐II PA) 1,200 Lower than ¼‐mile (CAT‐III PA)
RVR: Runway Visual Range
APV: Approach Procedure with Vertical Guidance
PA: Precision Approach
Source: FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design
Taxiway Design Group
The TDG relates to the undercarriage dimensions of the design air‐ craft. Taxiway/taxilane width and fillet standards, and, in some in‐ stances, runway to taxiway and taxiway/taxilane separation require‐ ments are determined by TDG. It is appropriate for taxiways to be planned and built to different TDG standards based on expected use.

The TDG standards are based on the main gear width (MGW) and the cockpit to main gear (CMG) distance. The taxiway design elements determined by the application of the TDG include the taxiway width, taxiway edge safety margin, taxiway shoulder width, taxiway fillet di‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 172 36 mensions, and, in some cases, the separation distance between paral‐ lel taxiways/taxilanes. Other taxiway elements such as the taxiway safety area (TSA), taxiway/taxilane object free area (TOFA), taxi‐ way/taxilane separation to parallel taxiway/taxilanes or fixed or movable objects, and taxiway/taxilane wingtip clearances are deter‐ mined solely based on the wingspan (ADG) of the design aircraft uti‐ lizing those surfaces.

Critical Aircraft
The FAA recommends designing airfield facilities to meet the re‐ quirements of the airport’s most demanding aircraft, or critical air‐ craft. The critical design aircraft is defined as the most demanding category of aircraft which conducts 500 or more annual operations at the airport.

Planning for future aircraft use is of particular importance since de‐ sign standards are used to plan separation distances between facili‐ ties. These standards must be determined now, since the relocation of these facilities will likely be extremely expensive at a later date.

Aircraft currently operating at Oakdale Municipal Airport include all types of general aviation aircraft, ranging from small single and multi‐ engine aircraft, which fall within aircraft approach categories A and B and airplane design groups I and II. The majority of based aircraft fall within RDCs A‐I and B‐I. Helicopters are not included in this determi‐ nation as they are not assigned an RDC.

The current airfield is designed to ARC B‐I standards, small aircraft (≤ 12,500 pounds). It is anticipated that the airport will continue to be used by critical aircraft within ARC A‐I and B‐I categories through the planning period. Therefore, Oakdale Municipal Airport should maintain ARC B‐I design standards, with critical aircraft having maxi‐ mum gross weights not exceeding 12,500 pounds. A typical aircraft in this category is the twin‐engine Cessna 421 Golden Eagle.

SAFETY AREA DESIGN STANDARDS
The FAA has established several imaginary surfaces to protect aircraft operational areas and keep them free from obstructions that could af‐ fect their safe operation. These include the runway safety area (RSA), runway object free area (ROFA), runway obstacle free zone (ROFZ), and runway protection zone (RPZ).

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 173 37 The entire RSA, ROFA, and ROFZ must be under the direct ownership of the airport sponsor to ensure these areas remain free of obstacles and can be readily accessed by maintenance and emergency person‐ nel. The RPZ should also be under airport ownership. An alternative to outright ownership of the RPZ is the purchase of avigation ease‐ ments (acquiring control of designated airspace within the RPZ) or having sufficient land use control measures in places which ensure the RPZ remains free of incompatible development.

Dimensional standards for the various safety areas associated with the runway are a function of the type of aircraft expected to use the runways as well as the instrument approach capability. Table X pre‐ sents the FAA design standards as they currently apply to Runway 10‐ 28 at Oakdale Municipal Airport.

TABLE X
Safety Area Design Standards
Oakdale Municipal Airport
FAA Design Standards
Airport Reference Code
Approach Visibility Minimums
B‐I (Small Aircraft)
Visual and/or > 1 Mile
Runway Width 60’
Runway Centerline To:

Holding Position
Parallel Taxiway Centerline
Aircraft Parking Area
125’
150’
125’
Runway Safety Area (RSA)
Length Beyond Departure End
Length Prior To Threshold
Width
240’
240’
120’
Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)
Length Beyond Runway End
Length Prior To Threshold
Width
240’
240’
250’
Runway Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ)
Length Beyond Each Runway End
Width
200’
250’
Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
Inner Width
Outer Width
Length
250’
450’
1,000'
Source: FAA AC 150/5300‐13, Airport Design.

RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
The RSA is defined in FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, as a “sur‐ face surrounding the runway prepared or suitable for reducing the Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 174 38 risk of damage to airplanes in the event of undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway.” The RSA is centered on the runway and dimensioned in accordance to the approach speed of the critical de‐ sign aircraft using the runway. The FAA requires the RSA to be cleared and graded, drained by grading or storm sewers, capable of accommodating the design aircraft and fire and rescue vehicles, and free of obstacles not fixed by navigational purpose such as runway edge lights or approach lights.

The FAA has placed a higher significance on maintaining adequate RSA at all airports. Under Order 5200.8, effective October 1, 1999, the FAA established the Runway Safety Area Program. The Order states, “The objective of the Runway Safety Area Program is that all RSAs at federally‐obligated airports…shall conform to the standards contained in Advisory Circular 150/5300‐13, Airport Design, to the extent prac‐ ticable.” Each Regional Airports Division of the FAA is obligated to collect and maintain data on the RSA for each runway at the airport and perform airport inspections.

RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA
The ROFA is “a two‐dimensional ground area, surrounding runways, taxiways, and taxilanes, which is clear of objects except for objects whose location is fixed by function (i.e., airfield lighting).” The OFA does not have to be graded and level like the RSA; instead, the primary requirement for the OFA is that no object in the OFA penetrates the lateral elevation of the RSA. The runway OFA is centered on the run‐ way, extending out in accordance to the critical design aircraft utiliz‐ ing the runway.

RUNWAY OBSTACLE FREE ZONE
The ROFZ is an imaginary volume of airspace which precludes object penetrations, including taxiing and parked aircraft. The only allow‐ ance for OFZ obstructions is navigational aids mounted on frangible bases which are fixed in their location by function, such as airfield signs. The OFZ is established to ensure the safety of aircraft opera‐ tions. If the OFZ is obstructed, the airport’s approaches could be re‐ moved or approach minimums could be increased.

RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONES
The RPZ is a trapezoidal area centered on the runway, typically be‐ ginning 200 feet beyond the runway end. The RPZ has been estab‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 175 39 lished by the FAA to provide an area clear of obstructions and incom‐ patible land uses, in order to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground. The RPZ is comprised of the central portion of the RPZ and the controlled activity area. The central portion of the RPZ extends from the beginning to the end of the RPZ, is centered on the runway, and is the width of the ROFA. The controlled activity area is any remaining portions of the RPZ. The dimensions of the RPZ vary according to the visibility minimums serving the runway and the type of aircraft (design aircraft) operating on the runway.

While the RPZ is intended to be clear of incompatible objects or land uses, some uses are permitted with conditions and other land uses are prohibited. According to AC 150/5300‐13A, the following land uses are permissible within the RPZ:
 Farming that meets the minimum buffer requirements.
 Irrigation channels as long as they do not attract birds.  Airport service roads, as long as they are not public roads and are directly controlled by the airport operator.
 Underground facilities, as long as they meet other design criteria, such as RSA requirements, as applicable.
 Unstaffed navigational aids (NAVAIDs) and facilities, such as re‐ quired for airport facilities that are fixed‐by‐function in regard to the RPZ.

Any other land uses considered within RPZ land owned by the airport sponsor must be evaluated and approved by the FAA Office of Air‐ ports. The FAA has published, Interim Guidance on Land Uses within a Runway Protection Zone (9.27.2012), which identifies several poten‐ tial land uses that must be evaluated and approved prior to imple‐ mentation. The specific land uses requiring FAA evaluation and ap‐ proval include:
 Buildings and structures (residences, schools, churches, hospitals or other medical care facilities, commercial/industrial buildings, etc.).
 Recreational land use (golf courses, sports fields, amusement parks, other places of public assembly, etc.).
 Transportation facilities (rail facilities, public roads/highways, ve‐ hicular parking facilities, etc.).
 Fuel storage facilities (above and below ground).
 Hazardous material storage (above and below ground).
 Wastewater treatment facilities.
 Above‐ground utility infrastructure (i.e., electrical substations), in‐ cluding any type of solar panel installations.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 176 40 The Interim Guidance on Land within a Runway Protection Zone states, “RPZ land use compatibility also is often complicated by ownership considerations. Airport owner control over the RPZ land is empha‐ sized to achieve the desired protection of people and property on the ground. Although the FAA recognizes that in certain situations the airport sponsor may not fully control land within the RPZ, the FAA ex‐ pects airport sponsors to take all possible measures to protect against and remove or mitigate incompatible land uses.”
Currently, the RPZ review standards are applicable to any new or modified RPZ. The following actions or events could alter the size of an RPZ, potentially introducing an incompatibility:
 An airfield project (e.g., runway extension, runway shift).  A change in the critical design aircraft that increases the RPZ di‐ mensions.
 A new or revised instrument approach procedure that increases the size of the RPZ.
 A local development proposal in the RPZ (either new or reconfig‐ ured).

Since the interim guidance only addresses new or modified RPZs, ex‐ isting incompatibilities are essentially grandfathered under certain circumstances. While it is still necessary for the airport sponsor to take all reasonable actions to meet the RPZ design standard, FAA funding priority for certain actions, such as relocating existing roads in the RPZ, will be determined on a case by case basis.

AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS
As indicated earlier, airfield facilities include those facilities that are related to the arrival, departure, and ground movement of aircraft.

These components include:
 Runways
 Taxiways
 Airfield Lighting, Marking, and Signage
 Navigational Approach Aids

RUNWAYS
The adequacy of the existing runway system at Oakdale Municipal Airport has been analyzed from a number of perspectives, including runway orientation, runway length, pavement strength, width, and Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 177 41 “… the runway system is
properly orientated and a
crosswind runway is not
needed.”
adherence to safety area standards. From this information, require‐ ments for runway improvements were determined for the airport.

Runway Orientation
For the operational safety and efficiency of an airport, it is desirable for the primary runway to be oriented as close as possible to the di‐ rection of the prevailing wind. This reduces the impact of wind com‐ ponents perpendicular to the direction of travel of an aircraft that is landing or taking off.

FAA AC 150/5300‐13A, Airport Design, recommends that a crosswind runway be made available when the primary runway orientation pro‐ vides for less than 95 percent wind coverage for specific crosswind components. The 95 percent wind coverage is computed on the basis of the crosswind component not exceeding 10.5 knots (12 mph) for RDC A‐I and B‐I, 13 knots (15 mph) for RDC A‐II and B‐II, and 16 knots (18 mph) for RDC A‐III, B‐III, C‐I through C‐III, and D‐I through D‐III.

Weather data specific to the airport was not availa‐
ble. Therefore, data from the nearest weather sta‐ tion in Modesto, California (located 11 miles south‐
west) was used for this analysis. Exhibit K presents
the all‐weather wind rose for the airport. Based up‐
on historical wind data, Runway 10‐28 exceeds 95 percent for all crosswind components. Therefore, based on this anal‐ ysis, the runway system is properly orientated and a crosswind run‐ way is not needed.

Runway Length
Runway length requirements have been developed using FAA Adviso‐ ry Circular (AC) 150/5325‐4B, Runway Length Requirements for Air‐ port Design. This program groups general aviation aircraft by catego‐ ry and by anticipated stage length needs. Local site specific data for elevation, temperature, and runway gradient are used in the calcula‐ tions. Table Y summarizes the FAA’s generalized recommended run‐ way lengths for Oakdale Municipal Airport.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 178 42 TABLE Y
Runway Length Requirements
Oakdale Municipal Airport

AIRPORT AND RUNWAY DATA
Airport elevation ........................................................................................................................................................................... 237 feet Mean daily maximum temperature of the hottest month ............................................................................................ 97.0° F Maximum difference in runway centerline elevation ..................................................................................................... 13 feet

RUNWAY LENGTHS RECOMMENDED FOR AIRPORT DESIGN
Small airplanes with less than 10 passenger seats
95 percent of these small airplanes ........................................................................................................................... 3,300 feet 100 percent of these small airplanes ........................................................................................................................ 3,800 feet Small airplanes with 10 or more passenger seats ..................................................……………………………………4,300 feet Reference: FAA AC 150/5325‐4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design.

Based upon the FAA’s design length requirements, local conditions call for a runway length of at least 3,300 feet to accommodate 95 per‐ cent of small airplanes. At its existing length of 3,013 feet, Runway 10‐28 falls short of this. However, it is important to note that the exit‐ ing runway length does satisfy 91 percent of the 95 percent category.

In addition, the required take‐off and landing lengths for maximum load and range (adjusted for temperature and elevation) for several of the based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport were also examined.

It was determined that none of these based aircraft required a runway length greater than 3,013 feet. An extension to the runway would also be restricted due to Wren Road on the west end and South Main Canal on the east end. Therefore, a runway extension is not proposed at the airport.

Runway Width
Runway width is based upon the RDC for each runway. For RDC B‐I serving small aircraft exclusively, the FAA specifies a width of 60 feet.

Runway 10‐28 is 75 feet wide, exceeding this requirement.

Runway Pavement Strength
The most important feature of airfield pavement is its ability to with‐ stand repeated use by aircraft of significant weight on a regular basis.

While the pavement strength rating is not the maximum weight limit, aircraft weighing more than the certified strength can only operate on the runway on an infrequent basis. Heavy aircraft operations can shorten the life span of airport pavements.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 179 10 28 NORTH
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 180 43 “The separation standard
for RDC B‐I (small aircraft),
with not lower than one
mile visibility minimums, is
150 feet …”
Runway 10‐28 has a current strength rating of 20,000 pounds single wheel type landing gear (S). Since the airport is going to remain a B‐I facility (small aircraft), this will be sufficient through the planning pe‐ riod.

TAXIWAYS
Taxiways are constructed primarily to facilitate aircraft movements to and from the runway system. Some taxiways are necessary simply to provide access between the aprons and the runways, whereas other taxiways become necessary as activity increases at an airport to pro‐ vide safe and efficient use of the airfield.

Runway 10‐28 is served by a full‐length parallel taxiway (Taxiway A) and six connecting taxiways. The FAA has established standards for taxiway width and runway/taxiway separation distances. Taxiway width is determined by the ADG of the most demanding aircraft. Ac‐ cording to FAA design standards, the minimum taxiway width for ADG I is 25 feet. All taxiways serving Runway 10‐28 are presently 30 feet or wider.

One deficiency which has been noted is the angled entrance to Run‐ way 10 (Taxiway A). This entrance taxiway should be at a right angle to the runway. To correct this deficiency, the City will need to acquire property, add compacted embankment to meet design standards, and re‐mark the taxiway and hold lines.

The design standards for the separation between
runways and parallel taxiways are a function of the critical design aircraft and the instrument approach visibility minimum. The separation standard for RDC
B‐I (small aircraft), with not lower than one mile vis‐ ibility minimums, is 150 feet from the runway center‐
line to the parallel taxiway centerline. Parallel Taxi‐ way A is 150 feet from the runway, meeting separation design stand‐ ards.

Holding aprons provide an area for aircraft to prepare for departure off the taxiway and allow aircraft that are ready for departure to by‐ pass other aircraft. A holding apron is currently available on both ends of Runway 10‐28.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 181 44 AIRFIELD MARKING, LIGHTING, AND SIGNAGE
Runway markings are designed according to the type of instrument approach available on the runway. FAA AC 150/5340‐1J, Marking of Paved Areas on Airports, provides the guidance necessary to design an airport’s markings.

Non‐precision markings currently exist on Runway 10‐28. These markings are sufficient and should be maintained.

Taxiway and apron areas also require marking. Yellow centerline stripes are currently painted on all taxiway surfaces at the airport to provide this guidance to pilots. The apron areas have centerline markings to indicate the alignment of taxilanes within these areas.

Besides routine maintenance of the taxiway striping, these markings will be sufficient through the planning period.

Airport lighting systems provide critical guidance to pilots during nighttime and low‐visibility operations. Runway 10‐28 is presently equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). This will be sufficient through the planning period.

Effective ground movement of aircraft at night is enhanced by the availability of taxiway lighting. Presently, Taxiway A and its connect‐ ing taxiways are equipped with medium intensity taxiway lighting (MITL), which will be sufficient through the planning period.

Airfield signage provides another means of notifying pilots as to their location on the airport. A system of signs placed at several airfield in‐ tersections on the airport is the best method available to provide this guidance. The airfield signage at Oakdale Municipal Airport is suffi‐ cient and should be maintained through the planning period.

NAVIGATIONAL APPROACH AIDS
There are currently three published instrument approaches to Oakdale Municipal Airport: GPS Runway 10, GPS Runway 28, and VOR‐A. The GPS approaches provide the airport with the lowest min‐ imums. Utilizing either GPS approach, a properly equipped aircraft can land at the airport with 300‐foot cloud ceilings and one‐mile visi‐ bility for aircraft in approach categories A and B.

The GPS approaches can also be utilized as circling approaches, which allows pilots to land on any active runway at the airport. While providing flexibility for the pilot to land on the runway most closely aligned with the prevailing wind, a circling approach will have higher Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 182 45 visibility minimums in order to provide pilots with sufficient visibility and ground clearance to navigate visually from the approach to the desired runway end for landing.

To provide pilots with visual guidance information during landings to the runway, electronic visual approach aids are commonly provided at airports. The approach end of Runway 28 is equipped with a two‐box PAPI (PAPI‐2L), while the approach end of Runway 10 is equipped with a two‐box VASI (VASI‐2L). Upgrading to a PAPI‐2L on Runway 10 is recommended.

Runway End Identification Lights (REILs) provide the pilot with rapid and positive identification of the runway end. They consist of a set of synchronized flashing lights located laterally on each side of the run‐ way centerline at the runway end. REILs are currently installed on both ends of Runway 10‐28 and should be maintained through the planning period.

WEATHER REPORTING FACILITIES
The airport is equipped with a lighted wind cone, which provides pi‐ lots with information about wind conditions, and a segmented circle, which provides pilots with traffic information. These facilities are re‐ quired when the airport is not served by a 24‐hour ATCT.

The airport may want to consider the installation of an automated weather observation system (AWOS) on the airfield. An AWOS auto‐ matically records weather conditions such as wind speed, gusts, wind direction, temperature, dew point, altimeter setting, and density alti‐ tude. Since the AWOS requires a 500‐foot critical area, it will be nec‐ essary to locate the equipment on the south side of the airfield. A summary of the airside needs at Oakdale Municipal Airport is pre‐ sented on Exhibit L.

LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS
Landside facilities are those necessary for the handling of aircraft and passengers while on the ground. These facilities provide the essential interface between the air and ground transportation modes. The ca‐ pacities of the various components of each area were examined in re‐ lation to projected demand to identify future landside facility needs.

This includes the general aviation aircraft and pilot services, automo‐ bile parking, aircraft hangars, and aircraft parking.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 183 46 GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL AREA
Currently, there is no designated general aviation services company at Oakdale Municipal Airport. However, existing City‐owned facilities presently used for a non‐aviation business but marketed by the City for a fixed base operator are capable of providing an area for waiting passengers, a pilot’s lounge, flight planning, concessions, and re‐ strooms.

AIRCRAFT STORAGE HANGARS
Utilization of hangar space varies as a function of local climate, securi‐ ty, and owner preferences. The trend in general aviation aircraft, whether single or multi‐engine, is towards more sophisticated aircraft (and, consequently, more expensive aircraft); therefore, many aircraft owners prefer enclosed hangar space to outside tie‐downs.

The demand for aircraft storage hangars is dependent upon the num‐ ber and type of aircraft expected to be based at the airport in the fu‐ ture. For planning purposes, it is necessary to estimate hangar re‐ quirements based upon forecast operational activity. However, hang‐ ar development should be based upon actual demand trends and fi‐ nancial investment conditions.

While a majority of aircraft owners prefer enclosed aircraft storage, a number of based aircraft will still tie‐down outside (due to the lack of hangar availability, hangar rental rates, and/or operational needs).

Therefore, enclosed hangar facilities should not be planned for each based aircraft. At Oakdale Municipal Airport, the majority of based aircraft (approximately 85 percent) are currently stored in enclosed hangar facilities. It is estimated that the percentage of based aircraft stored in hangars will continue through the planning period.

Hangars are typically classified as either T‐Hangars (individual spaces within a larger contiguous structure that allow privacy and individual access to their space) or executive/conventional hangars (small to very large units which accommodate multiple aircraft). For this analy‐ sis, the Port‐a‐Port and box hangars have been grouped in the T‐ Hangar category.

Approximately 88 percent of the hangared aircraft at Oakdale Munici‐ pal Airport are currently stored in T‐hangars. The majority of aircraft currently stored in these hangars are single‐engine. A planning standard of 1,200 square feet per based aircraft has been used to de‐ termine future requirements.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 184 Runway 10-28
3,013' x 75'
20,000 (S)
ARC B-I (Small Aircraft Only)
Blast Pad - At Each End
Holding Apron - At Each End
Runway 10-28
Full-Length Parallel Taxiway A
(30' wide)
(150' From Runway Centerline)
Taxiways B, C, D, E, F
(30'-40' wide)
ATIS
Runway 10-28
VASI-2L (Runway 10)
PAPI-2L (Runway 28)
REILs
GPS Runway 10-28
(1 Mile Visibility, 300'
Cloud Ceilings)
Rotating Beacon,
Lighted Wind Cone,
Segmented Circle,
Tetrahedron,
Airfield Signage
Runway 10-28
MIRL
MITL
Pilot-Controlled Lighting
Non-Precision Marking
Category Available
nly)
End
ay A
line)
g
g
Runway 10-28
3,013' x 75'
20,000 (S)
ARC B-I (Small Aircraft Only)
Blast Pad - At Each End
Holding Apron - At Each End
Runway 10-28
Full-Length Parallel Taxiway A
(30' wide)
(150' From Runway Centerline)
Taxiways B, C, D, E, F
(30'-40' wide)
Realign Taxiway A at
Runway 10 Threshold

ATIS, AWOS
Runway 10-28
PAPI-2L (Runway 10)
PAPI-2L (Runway 28)
REILs
GPS Runway 10-28
(1 Mile Visibility, 300'
Cloud Ceilings)
Rotating Beacon,
Lighted Wind Cone,
Segmented Circle,
Tetrahedron,
Airfield Signage
Runway 10-28
MIRL
MITL
Pilot-Controlled Lighting
Non-Precision Marking
Long Term
Runways and
Design Standards
Runways and
Design Standards
Runways and
Design Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Taxiways and
Separation Standards
Navigational Aids Navigational Aids avigational Aids
Lighting
and Marking
Lighting
and Marking
Lighting
and Marking
ATIS - Automated Terminal Information Service
AWOS - Automated Airport Weather Station
GPS - Global Positioning System
REILs - Runway End Identifier Lights
S - Single Wheel Loading
PAPI - Precision Approach Path Indicator
MIRL - Medium Intensity Runway Lights
MITL - Medium Intensity Taxiway Lights
Exhibit L

AIRSIDE REQUIREMENTS
12MP04-L-11/15/13
Marking
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 185 47 The remaining 12 percent of hangared aircraft are stored in conven‐ tional/executive hangars, which are designed for multiple aircraft storage. As the trend towards more sophisticated aircraft continues throughout the planning period, it is important to determine the need for more conventional/executive hangars. For execu‐ tive/conventional hangars, a planning standard of 1,200 square feet was used for single‐engine aircraft, while a planning standard of 3,000 square feet was used for multi‐engine, jet, and helicopters.

Since portions of conventional/executive hangars are also used for aircraft maintenance and servicing, requirements for mainte‐ nance/service hangar area were estimated using a planning standard of approximately 15 percent of the total hangar space needs. Future hangar requirements for the airport are summarized on Exhibit M.

While the need for additional hangar storage is depicted, some of these storage needs could be met by ensuring that the existing hang‐ ars are being used for aircraft storage only.

It should also be noted that these hangar requirements are general in nature based on the aviation demand forecasts. Actual need for hang‐ ar space will depend on the actual usage within hangars. The recom‐ mended development concept identifies options available for hangar development at the airport and the best locations for each type of hangar facility.

Aircraft Parking Apron
A parking apron should provide for the number of locally based air‐ craft that are not stored in hangars, as well as for those aircraft used for air taxi and training activity. Parking should be provided for itin‐ erant aircraft as well. As previously mentioned, approximately 85 percent of based aircraft at Oakdale Municipal Airport are currently stored in hangars, and that percentage is expected to continue through the planning period.

For planning purposes, 20 percent of the based aircraft total will be used to determine the parking apron requirements of local aircraft, due to some aircraft requiring both hangar storage and parking apron space. Since the majority of locally based aircraft are stored in hang‐ ars, the area requirement for parking of locally based aircraft is small‐ er than for transient aircraft. Therefore, a planning criterion of 650 square yards per aircraft was used to determine the apron require‐ ments for local aircraft.

Transient aircraft parking needs must also be considered when de‐ termining apron requirements. Current apron area totals approxi‐ Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 186 48 mately 12,000 square yards, with a total of 20 aircraft positions. A planning criterion of 800 square yards was used for single and multi‐ engine itinerant aircraft and 1,600 square yards for itinerant jets. To‐ tal aircraft parking apron requirements are presented on Exhibit M.

The need for additional apron area is depicted in the short term. Ad‐ ditional apron area may also be needed as new hangar areas are de‐ veloped on the airport which are not contiguous with the existing apron areas.

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
The intent of this section has been to outline the facilities required to meet potential aviation demands projected for Oakdale Municipal Airport for the planning horizon. The next step is to determine a di‐ rection of development which best meets these projected needs through a recommended development concept. The remainder of this report will be devoted to outlining this direction, its schedule, and its costs.

DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
Based upon the facility requirements determinations in the previous section, a draft development concept has been formulated. This draft concept takes into consideration both airfield and landside considera‐ tions, including addressing safety and security needs. Following an updated airport layout plan drawing, a capital improvement program will be developed. However, a final decision with regard to pursuing a particular development plan which meets the needs of airport users rests with the City of Oakdale as the airport sponsor.

PAST PROJECTS
Prior to presenting the development concept, it is helpful to review airport development. Recounting recent (or ongoing) airfield im‐ provements can assist with the identification of current issues affect‐ ing future development options. Federal and state‐funded improve‐ ments at Oakdale Municipal Airport since 2000 include:
 2000 – Runway extended and rehabilitated; Hold aprons con‐ structed; Guidance signs and perimeter fencing installed; Im‐ provements to airport drainage; Visual guidance system installed.  2002 ‐ Improvements to runway safety area and airport drainage.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 187

AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL AVIATION TERMINAL AREA FACILITIES

VEHICLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS

AIRCRAFT STORAGE HANGAR REQUIREMENTS
Aircraft to be Hangared
T-Hangar/Port-A-Port Area (s.f.)
Conventional/Executive Hangar Area (s.f.)
Maintenance Area (s.f.)
Total Hangar Area (s.f.)
Single, Multi-Engine Transient Aircraft Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Transient Business Jet Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Locally Based Aircraft Positions
Apron Area (s.y.)
Total Positions
Total Apron Area (s.y.)
General Aviation Building Space (s.f.)
73 75,600
30,000
15,800
121,400
69 62,300
29,400
N/A
91,700
77 75,600
42,000
17,600
135,200
88 80,400
63,000
21,500
164,900
20 12,000
6 4,800
1 1,600
17 11,100
24 17,500
6 4,800
2 3,200
18 11,700
26 19,700
7 5,600
2 3,200
21 13,700
30 22,500
N/A 1,300 1,400 2,300
Design Hour Passengers
Terminal Vehicle Spaces
Parking Area (s.f.)
General Aviation Parking Spaces
General Aviation Parking Area (s.f.)
Total Parking Spaces
Total Parking Area (s.f.)
*Includes park-n-ride lot. Limited parking is available in unimproved parking lot. 20 8,100
8 16
6,400
43 17,200
59 23,600
9 19
7,600
46 18,400
65 26,000
11 27
10,800
52 20,800
79 31,600

AVAILABLE SHORT TERM
NEED

INTERMEDIATE

TERM NEED

LONG TERM
NEED
Exhibit M

LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS
11MP04-M-05/06/13
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 188 49  2003 – Improvements to runway safety area; Taxiway extended and taxiway lighting installed; Runway lighting and airport guid‐ ance signs installed.
 2006 – Runway rehabilitated.
 2012 – Perimeter fencing installed; Taxiways rehabilitated.

CONSIDERATION OF NON‐DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES

NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
In analyzing and comparing costs and benefits of various development alternatives, it is important to consider the consequences of no fur‐ ther development. The “no action” alternative essentially considers keeping the airfield in its present condition, and not providing for any improvements to existing facilities. The primary result of this alterna‐ tive, as in any changing air transportation market, would be the even‐ tual inability of the airport to satisfy the increasing demands of the lo‐ cal service area. Without improvements to the airport facilities, regu‐ lar and potential users of the airport would be constrained from tak‐ ing maximum advantage of the airport’s transportation capabilities.

The ramifications of the “no action” alternative extend into impacts on the economic well‐being of the region. If facilities are not maintained and improved so that the airport maintains a pleasant experience to the visitor or business traveler, then these individuals may consider alternate locations.

Thus, the “no action” alternative is inconsistent with the long term transportation system goals of the city and county, which are to en‐ hance local and interstate commerce. A policy of “no action” would be considered an irresponsible approach, affecting not only the long term viability of the airport and the investment that has been made in it, but also the economic growth and development of the airport’s ser‐ vice area. Therefore, the “no action” alternative was not considered as prudent or feasible.

TRANSFER SERVICES TO ANOTHER AIRPORT
Limiting development at Oakdale Municipal Airport and relying on other airports to serve aviation demand for the local area is an alter‐ native for consideration. As discussed in the inventory section, there are three public‐use general aviation airports located within a 30‐mile radius of Oakdale Municipal. All three of these airports offer similar services to those provided at Oakdale. The longest runway at any of Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 189 50 these airports is at Columbia Airport, which has a runway length of 4,673 feet.

Growth in new businesses will continue to create a need for local ac‐ cess to the air transportation system. The role of the airport is ex‐ pected to continue as a general aviation facility.

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW AIRPORT
The alternative of developing an entirely new airport facility to meet the aviation needs of the local area can also be considered when an airport reaches capacity and it is cost‐prohibitive to expand the exist‐ ing facility. However, development of a new airport is not considered necessary at this time.

RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
The recommended development concept, depicted on Exhibit N, is a composite of airside and landside considerations developed in the previous section. The following sections will describe, in narrative and graphic form, the recommended plan for the future use of Oakdale Municipal Airport. A phased program to implement this de‐ velopment concept will also be presented.

AIRSIDE CONSIDERATIONS
Airfield facilities are, by their very nature, a focal point of the airport complex. Because of their role, and the fact that they physically domi‐ nate a great deal of the airport’s property, airfield facility needs are of‐ ten the most critical factor in the determination of viable airport de‐ velopment alternatives. In particular, the runway system requires the greatest influence on the identification and development of other air‐ port facilities. Furthermore, due to the number of aircraft operations, there are a number of FAA design criteria that must be considered when looking at airfield improvements. The airside considerations have been identified on Exhibit N and include:
 Property acquisition of safety areas on both runway ends and re‐ location of entrance taxiway (A).
 Acquire property interest for Runway Protection Zones (RPZs).  Reroute/Culvert South Drain Canal to clear runway safety ar‐ ea/obstacle free zone.
 Install Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) on the airfield.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 190 0 300

SCALE IN FEET

LANDSIDE INSET
EAA
Box Hangars/ Port-a-Ports
B
Taxiway A
West Apron
C
D
E
T-Hangars
Hangars
Hangar Aircraft
Wash Rack
Pilot’s Lounge
Relocate
Existing Fuel Tank
Transient Apron
Auto
Parking
Future Hangar
Future Fuel
BoxHangar Expansion
Hangar Expansion
City Hangar
Existing/Ultimate Runway 10-28 (3,013’ x 75’)
Blast Pad Holding Apron
Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Existing/Future RPZ (250’x 450’x 1,000’) Holding Apron
REILS
Future PAPI
Closed
Landfill
Remove
VASI
A
B
lti
C
te
Taxiway A
0 2
0 D
E
F
Airport Beacon
40’
40’
30’
30’
30’
150’
30’ Blast Pad
REILS
Future AWOS
500’ Critical Area
PAPI
Reroute or CulvertSouth Main Canal
South Main CanalSouth Main Canal South Main Canal
Wren Rd.

Laughlin Rd.
13’
Closed Taxiway Clos
Long-Term GA
Development
Lighted Windcone,
Segmented Circle, and
Tetrahedron
RelocateExisting Fuel
Future Fuel
Exhibit N

RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
12MP04-N-05/06/13
NORTH
Aerial Photography: Aero-Graphics, 02/06/2012
LEGEND
Existing Airport Property Line
Future Airport Property Line
Runway Safety Area (RSA)Object Free Area (ROFA)Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ)Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)Acquire Property Interest (Easement)Property Acquisition (Fee Simple)Long-Term Development PotentialFuture HangarFuture Apron/Parking/Taxiway 0 400 800

SCALE IN FEET
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 191
51  Replace VASI on Runway 10 end with PAPI.
 Acquire property on south side for long‐term general aviation de‐ velopment.

LANDSIDE CONSIDERATIONS
The landside plan has been devised to safely, securely, and efficiently accommodate potential aviation demand. The landside considera‐ tions for Oakdale Municipal Airport are also depicted on Exhibit N and include:
 Establish full service fixed base operation to provide aircraft and pilot services.
 Relocate fueling facilities to transient apron.
 Expand main hangar used by Sierra West.
 Construct additional box hangars for aircraft storage (private).  Potential apron expansion for aircraft parking.
 Long term general aviation expansion on south side of airfield.

AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
While the FAA and Caltrans require the City to submit a five‐year Air‐ port Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) each year, this planning ef‐ fort has afforded the opportunity to examine projects in the 6‐20 year intermediate and long term planning horizons. The current Airport Improvement Program (AIP) provides up to 90 percent funding in eli‐ gible projects, with the airport sponsor providing a 10 percent match, (with Caltrans potentially contributing half of the local match on pro‐ jects benefiting general aviation). The potential projects are summa‐ rized in Table Z.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 192 52 TABLE Z
Airport Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
Total
Cost
FAA
Eligible
Local
Share
Short Term Program (0‐5 Years)

1. Erosion Control – Design

2. Slope Stabilization – Design

3. Erosion Control – Construction

4. Slope Stabilization – Construction

5. PAPI Replacement

6. Perimeter Fencing – Design & Construction

7. Pavement Management System

8. Runway Pavement Maintenance
$26,250
26,250
157,500
157,500
31,500
157,500
42,000
105,263
$23,625
23,625
141,750
141,750
28,350
141,750
37,800
94,736
$2,625
$2,625
15,750
15,750
3,150
15,750
4,200
10,527
Subtotals – Short Term Program $703,763 $633,386 $70,377 Long Term Program (6‐20 Years)

9. Property Acquisitions

10. AWOS Acquisition/Installation

11. Reroute/Culvert South Main Canal

12. Site Preparation for Hangar Construction

13. Relocate Entrance Taxiway (A)

14. Infrastructure – South Side (Grading, Taxiway,
Access Road)
$421,000
200,000
500,000
300,000
150,000
500,000
$378,900
180,000
450,000
270,000
135,000
450,000
$42,100
20,000
50,000
30,000
15,000
50,000
Subtotals – Long Term Program $2,071,000 $1,863,900 $207,100 Grand Totals $2,774,763 $2,497,286 $277,477
Sources: City of Oakdale and Coffman Associates.

Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 193

APPENDIX A
Airport Layout Drawings
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 194 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 195
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 196
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 197
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 198
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 199

APPENDIX B
FAA ALP Approval Letter
& Signed ALP
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 200 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 201 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 202 Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 203

KANSAS CITY
(816) 524-3500
237 N.W. Blue Parkway
Suite 100
Lee's Summit, MO 64063

PHOENIX
(602) 993-6999
4835 E. Cactus Road
Suite 235
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
Airport Consultants
www.coffmanassociates.com
Exhibit-C: Oakdale Municipal Airport Layout Plan and Narrative 204

ATTACHMENT C
Sean Carroll Partnership lease termination letter for Hangar L-4 205

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
Date: March 3, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Mark Niskanen, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Bryan Whitemyer, City Manager
Subject: Amendment to Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Prezone, Addendum to Environmental Impact Report, and Annexation 2017-17 I. BACKGROUND
The Applicant, Mr. Randall P. Thomas, has filed applications for a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Annexation, and Prezoning for approximately 297-acres of land located within the southeastern portion of the City of Oakdale (City). The Project site is commonly known as the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (Specific Plan). Of the 297-acre plan area, the Applicant currently has ownership of 182.35-acres.

The Specific Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2011082051) (EIR) was adopted by the Oakdale City Council (City Council) on March 3, 2014. At that time, the City Council adopted the Specific Plan, certified the EIR, and prezoned all properties within the Specific Plan.

The Specific Plan and the associated EIR were prepared and adopted concurrently with the City’s 2030 General Plan and Crane Crossing Specific Plan, which is another specific plan area located on West F Street in the western portion of the City.

A Location Map, which illustrates the plan area’s location, is provided below.

AGENDA ITEM 10.1
206

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025

LOCATION MAP
The plan area is bounded by East F Street/State Route 120 to the north, Sierra Road to the south, S.

Stearns Road and agricultural lands to the east, and Orsi Road to the west.

Existing Setting
The plan area consists primarily of grazing lands, rural ranchettes, and orchard land. Rural residences are generally located along Orsi Road, Sierra Road, and S. Stearns Road. The plan area also consists of Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) facilities including the Adams Creek Drainage Corridor, Adams Pipeline No. 1, and the West Pump Pipeline. PG&E facilities are also located within the plan area, which consists of an overhead transmission line.

The plan area includes an existing residential neighborhood (Twildo Road and Seaman Drive), which is served by individual septic systems and a domestic water system managed by OID. This area, known as Improvement District (ID) No. 22 by OID, includes parcels located on Twildo Road and Seaman Drive. The existing water system includes a water well, four (4) and eight (8) inch water lines, and the OID West Pump No. 2 Pipeline easement, necessary to provide potable water to the individual parcels within ID No. 22. A major component of the Specific Plan project includes requirements for the master developer to fund and install improvements in this neighborhood in 207

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
accordance with City standards as they apply to roadway, curb, gutter, sidewalk and utility improvements (i.e. domestic water and sewer connections).

II. DISCUSSION
General Plan Amendment:

The City’s 2030 General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 2013. With this Specific Plan Amendment, corresponding amendments to the City’s Land Use and Community Form Element of the 2030 General Plan are included, to ensure consistency between the City’s 2030 General Plan and the Specific Plan. The General Plan amendment is focused on the land use designations of properties within the Specific Plan. The figures on the following pages provide the City’s 2030 General Plan existing land use designations and the changes to the General Plan land use designations.

On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission, by vote of 4-0, recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment.
208

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Existing 2030 General Plan Land Use Designations
209

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations
210

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
The sole purpose of the General Plan Amendment is to allow for land use consistency between the City’s 2030 General Plan and the amendments to the Specific Plan. 2014 Specific Plan and Specific Plan Amendment:
2014 Sierra Pointe Specific Plan
The Specific Plan was originally adopted on March 3, 2014, and assumes the following land use summary and buildout. At full buildout, the Specific Plan allows for the development of 901 dwelling units, 1,118,099 square feet (sf) of General Commercial, Flex Use/General Commercial, Office, and Public/Semi-Public land uses, and 14.22-acres of parks and open space.

Specific Plan Land Use Summary – As Adopted in 2014
211

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
The adopted Land Use Plan for the Specific Plan, which reflects the Land Use Summary provided above, is also illustrated below:

Specific Plan Land Use Plan (As Adopted in 2014)
212

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Specific Plan Amendment:

Chapter 3 – Land Use and Mobility
Upon submission of formal application materials filed by the Applicant, staff conducted a comprehensive review of the Specific Plan. This review resulted in minor amendments to the Specific Plan, primarily in Chapters 3 (Land Use and Mobility), 4 (Utilities and Services), and the creation and inclusion of Appendix C (Conceptual Phasing Plan). The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan are summarized below. Some of the proposed amendments are a result of a Biological Assessment which evaluated the Adams Creek drainage corridor. The assessment found sensitive species and biological impacts, which led staff to designate this area as a protected open space corridor. This resulted in land use amendments, and also an amendment to Chapter 4 (Utilities and Service Systems) to direct stormwater to be captured in dual use park/storm drain basins and percolate, rather than discharging into OID facilities. These amendments resulted in the following land use summary. 213

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed Land Use Summary
The Proposed Project’s Land Use Plan, which reflects the Land Use Summary is illustrated below:
214

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed Project Land Use Plan
At full buildout, the project will result in the development of 890 dwelling units (an 11-unit reduction from what was adopted in 2014), 1,159,392 sf of General Commercial, Flex Use/General Commercial, 215

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Office, and Public/Semi-Public land uses (an increase of 41,323 sf from what was adopted in 2014), and 18.99-acres of parks and open space (an increase of 4.77-acres from what was adopted in 2014).

The project also includes amendments to the Land Use and Mobility Chapter. These amendments are the result of the Biological Assessment‘s identification of sensitive biological resources located in and around the Adams Creek Drainage Corridor, which were not considered in 2014. Through the Biological Assessment, staff determined that portions of the Adams Creek drainage corridor would need to be restricted from future development as it is considered a seasonal wetland. The identification of seasonal wetlands located within and adjacent to the Adams Creek drainage corridor resulted in amendments to the Land Use and Mobility Chapter of the Specific Plan. The identification of these seasonal wetlands resulted in minor amendments to the Specific Plan, notably to land use designations within the plan area. The area is proposed to be designated for open space instead of Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) land uses as in the original Specific Plan. The designated lands in and around the Adams Creek Drainage Corridor are illustrated below:

Open Space – Adams Creek Drainage Corridor
Mobility
The land use amendments in and around the Adams Creek Drainage Corridor also caused the realignment of roadways within the plan area. Street classifications are not proposed to be amended.

Rather, the only amendment affecting Mobility is the alignment of major roadways within the plan area, including specifically a realignment of the north/south Signature Street, which extends from Sierra Road north to HDR-1. In addition, the 2014 Specific Plan assumes the intersection of SR 120/East F Street and Stearns Road would be expanded and signalized. Rather than a signalized intersection, the project contemplates the potential of a round-a-bout at this location. 216

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Parks and Open Space
The project also would provide 18.99-acres of parks and open space, an increase of 4.77-acres from what was adopted in 2014. A total of three (3) neighborhood parks are envisioned within the Specific Plan. Refer to the Specific Plan (Attachment D), Section 3.5.4, for a detailed discussion on parks and open space within the plan area. Park 1 is approximately 7.34-acres in size and is located along the north/south Signature Street within the plan area. Park 1 will consist of recreational amenities, with play fields and open turf areas that will serve as dual-purpose stormwater detention.

Proposed Park 1 Conceptual Plan
Parks 2 and 3 are approximately 6.68 acres in size and are located within the southern portion of the plan area. Parks 2 and 3 will consist of recreational amenities, with play fields and open turf areas that will be dual-purpose for stormwater detention, similar to Park 1 discussed above. 217

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed Parks 2 and 3 Conceptual Plans
Chapter 4 (Utilities and Services):

Storm Drain Infrastructure
Storm drainage systems within the project are planned to utilize on-site stormwater detention basins.

These basins are designed to allow water to percolate into the ground. In general, non-residential uses within the Mixed-Use Corridor will be required to contain storm water run-off onsite by using underground percolation or onsite storage basins. Residential uses within the southern portion of the plan area will be served by 24 to 36-inch mainlines merging into a single 48-inch outfall into a basin within the southern neighborhood Park (Parcels P-2). This 6.14-acre park site will also consist of upper and lower sections, with the upper eastern section roughly at street level and the lower western section lowered by approximately five (5) feet. The basin in the park will be approximately

2.6 acres and have a storage capacity of 9.7-acre feet with one (1) foot of freeboard.

The stormwater system for the Specific Plan is illustrated below 218

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed Stormwater Facilities
Appendix C (Conceptual Phasing Plan):

Chapter 5 and Appendix C of the Specific Plan provides the conceptual phasing plan for the plan area, which is illustrated as follows:
219

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Proposed Project Phasing Plan
The Specific Plan remains consistent with what was adopted in 2014 in terms of establishing a Residential Neighborhood Phase and a Mixed-Use Corridor Phase. The amendments to the phasing provide additional detail by establishing eight (8) development phases, as well as the identification of major backbone infrastructure required for each phase. This phasing detail is provided in Appendix C of the Specific Plan.
220

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
In general, the major backbone infrastructure required per phase and as necessary to support development of the Specific Plan is as follows:

Phase 1
• Realignment and full improvement of S. Stearns Road and SR 120/Stearns Road Intersection Improvements – this improvement is required to be installed and completed with the first phase of development.
• Frontage and widening improvements on SR 120/East F Street. • Improvement of S. Stearns Road from SR 120/East F Steet to Lando Drive. • Installation of necessary utility infrastructure.

Phase 2
• Park 1 improvements to be completed and in operation prior to build-out of Phase 2. • Roadway improvements to S. Stearns Road, Lando Drive, and J Street. • Installation of necessary utility infrastructure.

Phase 3
• Domestic Water Well and Storage Tank – required to be installed and operable prior to the issuance of the 500th Building Permit.
• Installation of sewer lift station near J Street.
• Roadway improvements to Orsi Road, Sierra Road, and J Street. • Evaluate domestic water connections to ID No. 22.

Phase 4
• Roadway improvements to S. Stearns Road, Sierra Road, and completion of J Street improvements.
• Completion of Parks 2 and 3 prior to full build-out of Phase 4.

Phase 5
• SR 120/East F Street frontage improvements.
• Connect parcels within ID No. 22 to City’s wastewater system. • Installation of utilities such as water, sewer, and storm drainage. 221

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Phase 6
• Roadway improvements to Orsi Road and Lando Drive.
• Installation of utilities such as water, sewer, and storm drainage.

Phase 7
• Widening of Lando Drive and Orsi Road and completion of J Street improvements. • Installation of utilities such as water, sewer, and storm drainage.

Phase 8
• Roadway improvements to Twildo Drive and Seaman Avenue within ID No. 22. • Roadway improvements to “Old S. Stearns Road.”
• Installation of utilities such as water, sewer, and storm drainage.

On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission, by vote of 4-0, recommended approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment.

Annexation and Prezoning
The formal application filed consists of a request for the City to annex the 297-acre plan area into the City of Oakdale. As noted previously, the plan area is located within an unincorporated area of Stanislaus County that is directly adjacent to existing city limits, to the west of the plan area.

The project is located within the City’s adopted Sphere of Influence, which was approved by the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission (Stanislaus LAFCO), and therefore, it has been planned for and intended to be annexed into the City. The annexation request consists of the 297- acre plan area. If the annexation request is approved by the City Council, City staff will prepare an application for filing with Stanislaus LAFCO.

Once an annexation application is filed with Stanislaus LAFCO, the application follows specific procedures and is presented to landowners and voters in the annexation area. This process includes a protest proceeding and an election, if necessary. Based on staff’s initial review, as of January 6, 2023, there are 167 registered voters in the annexation area.

An annexation approval from Stanislaus LAFCO and affected residents does not grant physical development within the plan area. Should the annexation request be approved by the City, Stanislaus LAFCO, and affected residents, subsequent entitlement applications would then need to be formally 222

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
filed and be processed through the City’s planning process. Generally, post annexation entitlement applications will consist of the following:
• Tentative Subdivision Maps (TSM);
• Site Plan Review(s);
• Development Agreement(s);
• Financing Plan;
• Final Maps;
• Improvement Plans; and
• Building Permits.

Physical development within the plan area will not occur until the above entitlements are approved by the City. Concurrent with annexation, the plan area must also be prezoned. This process is defined by Section 36-23 (Zone Changes, Prezoning and Amendments) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Prezoning of the plan area was originally adopted by the City Council in March 2014 via Ordinance No. 1223. Ordinance No. 1223 prezoned the properties within the plan area consistent with the land uses set forth in the 2014 Specific Plan. A new prezoning ordinance is required to prezone the Specific Plan area consistent with the zoning designations of the updated Specific Plan.

The new prezoning component would replace what was adopted by the City Council in 2014.

In order to approve any prezoning in the City, the findings set forth in Section 36-23.6 of the Zoning Ordinance must be made. These findings are as follows:

A. That the proposed Zoning District is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans adopted by the City.

B. That the site is physically suitable for the density and/or intensity of the proposed Zoning District.

C. That the proposed Zoning District is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

D. That the Zoning District Change or Prezoning is required for public convenience and necessity.

On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission, by vote of 4-0, recommended approval of the proposed prezone and annexation.

Site Plan Review and Community Outreach:

The Proposed Project was distributed for Site Plan Review on March 11, 2024. The Site Plan Review process is an opportunity for City Departments and outside agencies (i.e. OID) to review the project and provide comments. During this Site Plan Review process, the City received comments from the 223

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
following: Oakdale Joint Unified School District (OJUSD) and OID. These comment letters are provided in Attachment G.

The letter provided by the OJUSD expresses a need for a Mitigation Agreement between the OJUSD and Developers of the Specific Plan. Section 4.2.1 of the amended Sierra Pointe Specific Plan allows for Mitigation Agreements to be executed to ensure that new development pays for its impact to existing and future school facilities.

The letter provided by OID provides comments and requirements associated with Improvement District No. 22 (ID 22) and other OID facilities within the plan area. OID’s requirements are included as part of the Specific Plan, and as noted above, future development will be responsible for funding and installing improvements within ID 22 in accordance with City standards.

In addition, throughout the processing of the project, the Applicant, in coordination with City staff, has held multiple public workshops/meetings with property owners and residents within the plan area.

The most recent Neighborhood Meeting was held on July 31, 2024, followed by a noticed workshop with the Planning Commission on September 4, 2024.

Following the September 4, 2024 Planning Commission Workshop, the Draft Specific Plan document was published on the City’s website in December 2024 (Refer to https://www.oakdalegov.com/planning-division). In conjunction with this publication, the City mailed to property owners within the plan area and properties within a 300-foot radius of the plan area notifying the public that the Draft Specific Plan was available for review and comment.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
As mentioned, the Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2011082051) was certified by the City Council on March 3, 2014, per Resolution No. 2014-27, and is on file with the City. In this certification, the City Council also adopted CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Future development within the plan area will be responsible for complying with the mitigation measures adopted as part of the MMRP. For the reference of the Planning Commission, two (2) of the more prominent mitigation measures are highlighted below:
224

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Environmental Topic Mitigation Measure Summary Implementation Land Use and Ag.

Resources

4.1.3b – Agricultural mitigation required to
occur at a ratio of at least 1:1 for conversion
of Prime Farmlands, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, and Unique Farmlands.

Prior to annexation approval by the
Stanislaus LAFCO, the Applicant will be
required to execute a Mitigation
Agreement/Memorandum of
Understanding with the California
Farmland Trust to formalize payment of a
per-acre fee associated with the
conversion of farmland within the Plan
Area.

Transportation 4.5.4a – Install intersection improvements at intersection of SR 120/East F Street and
Stearns Road
Proposed Project is required to install
improvements concurrent to 1st phase of
development.

When an EIR has been certified for a project, CEQA Guidelines § 15164 allows for preparation of an Addendum, without the need for a subsequent EIR or negative declaration. An Addendum is appropriate when there are no new significant environmental effects, no substantial increases in the severity of previously identified environmental effects, and no new information of substantial importance that would require major changes to the EIR or identified mitigation measures. The proposed project only requires minor changes to the EIR to address the minor, technical amendments to the Specific Plan. The original development plan in the Specific Plan largely remains the same compared to the amended Specific Plan. It is anticipated that there would be no change to the significance of all environmental impacts evaluated in the original EIR. As demonstrated in the text of the Addendum, an Addendum is appropriate because none of the conditions calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

City staff has prepared the Addendum, which is included in this Staff Report as Attachment F.

The Addendum also addresses the land use plan alternative proposed by City staff, which would switch the VLDR-4 and HDR-1 land use designations.

Public Hearing Notice
Notice of the proposed project was published in the Modesto Bee and distributed to properties within a 300-foot radius of the site in accordance with City noticing requirements.

A copy of the draft Specific Plan was posted on the City’s website (https://www.oakdalegov.com/planning-division) in December 2024. A Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for annexations was also posted on the website. Property owners in the plan area and within a 300-foot radius received a letter notifying them that these documents were available for review. For reference, the FAQ Sheet and the Notification Letter are included as Attachment G. 225

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Planning Commission Hearing
On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing to review and consider the Proposed Project. Four (4) of the five (5) commissioners were in attendance. Upon hearing a presentation from staff, the public hearing was conducted to solicit comments and questions. A total of twelve (12) attendees spoke, including the Applicant’s Representative. A bullet points summary of the comments and questions received are provided below:
• Resident(s) of Improvement District (ID) No. 22 (Twildo Avenue and Seaman Drive) expressed concern over project’s impacts to water rights and infrastructure currently serving properties in ID No. 22 and overall water supply for the Plan Area. • Project impacts to existing infrastructure including roadways and schools. • Preference for re-locating the HDR-1 land use designation elsewhere within the plan area, and not adjacent to existing rural ranchette properties. • Overall growth and expansion to the east of the existing city limits. • Traffic impacts to Stearns Road.
• Concerns that residents are not being more involved in the planning and decision-making process.
• Concerns related to wildfire and flooding and hydrology. • Comment pertaining to the relationship between the City’s Draft Housing Element and the Specific Plan.
• Preference for no more growth and development in the City of Oakdale. • Concerned about the keeping of farm animals upon annexation.

Relative to ID No. 22, water connections are anticipated to occur with the development of Phase 3, upon installation and operation of the water well and storage tank necessary to serve the plan area. At this time, OID will require the relinquishment of ID No 22, per their letter, dated March 29, 2024. Upon providing water connections, OID will no longer be a Trustee of ID No. 22, and the area will be served with City water services. Prior to OID’s relinquishment of ID No. 22, coordination with the residents within the improvement district and OID will occur. In addition, within the area noted as “HDR-1” in the SPSP Land Use Diagram there is an existing water well and easement, which provides water service to properties within ID No. 22. Should the HDR-1 site be developed prior to water connections being provided to properties within ID No. 22, the City will coordinate with OID to ensure the existing water rights, infrastructure and easement remain in service.

Relative to the location of HDR-1 and comments received during the Planning Commission Hearing, staff agrees with the comments provided and is proposing to re-designate the area currently known as HDR-1 to VLDR-4, and re-designate the area currently known as VLDR-4 to HDR-1. This allows the majority of the VLDR land use designations to be consolidated within the plan area. It also allows connectivity between HDR-1 and Flex/GC-1 and the basis for this is the Flex/GC-1 land use designation 226

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
allows for high density residential development. Refer to Attachment I for an Optional Land Use Plan.

While the Planning Commission’s action did not reflect this modification, staff is in agreement with the comments provided by residents at the Planning Commission Hearing and are recommending this revision to the City Council.

The public hearing was then closed by the Planning Commission Chairman. Upon a brief discussion by the Commission, a Motion was made by Commissioner West, which was seconded by Commissioner Ivey. The Planning Commission then voted 4-0 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, EIR Addendum, and Prezone and Annexation 2017-17. The signed Resolutions are included in this Staff Report (Attachment D).

III. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information and considerations provided in this report, City staff is recommending that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Motion to adopt a Resolution, adopting an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, amendment to the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan, and a General Plan Amendment. (Attachment A)
(2) Motion to introduce by title, and waive further reading, of an Ordinance Prezoning the Parcels Located in the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan. (Attachment B) (3) Motion to adopt a Resolution of Application to Initiate Proceedings for the Reorganization of the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan. (Attachment C)
IV. ATTACHMENTS
A. City Council Resolution No. 2025-XX
B. City Council Ordinance No. 2025-XX
C. City Council Resolution No. 2025-XX
D. Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-01 and 2025-02
E. Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (Amended)
F. Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Sierra Pointe Specific Plan G. Comment Letters from Oakdale Irrigation District and Oakdale Joint Unified School District H. FAQ Sheet and Notification Letter
I. Optional Land Use Plan
227

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment A
City Council Resolution No. 2025-XX – EIR Addendum, Specific Plan Amendment, and General Plan Amendment
228

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-XXX
{CW086741.2}

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING (1) AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SIERRA POINTE SPECIFIC PLAN, (2) AN AMENDMENT TO THE SIERRA POINT SPECIFIC PLAN, AND (3) A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2013, the Oakdale City Council (“City Council”) certified an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2011082051) (“EIR”) for the Oakdale 2030 General Plan, Climate Action Plan, Crane Crossing Specific Plan, and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan. The EIR is on file with the City of Oakdale (“City”); and
WHEREAS, in 2014, the City Council adopted the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”), to establish a regulatory framework for the development of approximately 297 acres located southeast of City limits; and
WHEREAS, in 2018, an application was filed with the City to initiate annexation of the Specific Plan area. During the review and processing of the application, City staff determined that an amendment to the Specific Plan was required to clarify existing conditions and make certain amendments to the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the changes to the Specific Plan include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) amendments to the land use diagram and land use table, (2) amendments to the circulation plan and realignment of signature streets, (3) designating the Adams Creek Corridor as a biological resource and open space area, and (4) changing the storm drainage plans to route stormwater to drainage basins and the City’s stormwater system; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines § 15164 provides that an Addendum to a previously adopted Environmental Impact Report may be prepared if minor technical changes or additions to the project are made and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines § 15162 calling for subsequent environmental review have occurred; and WHEREAS, City staff has prepared an Addendum to the EIR, attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A (“EIR Addendum”), to evaluate the project modifications and environmental impacts of the amended Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the amended Specific Plan document is attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, to ensure consistency between the Specific Plan and the Oakdale 2030 General Plan, the General Plan Land Use Map is proposed to be amended as shown in Exhibit C attached and incorporated hereto; and
229

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
WHEREAS, on February 19, 2025, the City of Oakdale Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended adoption of the EIR Addendum, Specific Plan Amendment, and General Plan Amendment described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
(1) The EIR Addendum adequately addresses the changes to the Specific Plan, there are no new significant impacts not already analyzed and mitigated in the EIR, and that none of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred.
(2) With the concurrent adoption of the General Plan Amendment described in Exhibit C, the Specific Plan is consistent with the Oakdale 2030 General Plan.
(3) The processing and content of the Specific Plan meets all requirements of Government Code section 65450 et seq. and Oakdale Municipal code section 36-21 (Specific Plans).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Oakdale that it hereby approves the following:

1. Adoption of the EIR Addendum attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2. Adoption of the amended Specific Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B.

3. Adoption of the amendments to the Oakdale 2030 General plan, as described in Exhibit C attached hereto.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 3rd DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
230

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)

EXHIBIT A
Addendum to Environmental Impact Report for Sierra Pointe Specific Plan

REFER TO ATTACHMENT F OF THIS STAFF REPORT
231

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)

EXHIBIT B
Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (Amended)

REFER TO ATTACHMENT E OF THIS STAFF REPORT
232

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
233

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment B
City Council Ordinance No. 2025-XX - Prezoning
234

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE PREZONING THE

PARCELS LOCATED IN THE SIERRA POINTE SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, in conjunction with this Ordinance, the Oakdale City Council (“City Council”) adopted an amendment to the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”), to establish a regulatory framework for the development of approximately 297 acres located southeast of the City of Oakdale (“City”) limits; and
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2013, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2011082051) (“EIR”) for the Oakdale 2030 General Plan, Climate Action Plan, Crane Crossing Specific Plan, and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan. The EIR is on file with the City; and WHEREAS, for the adoption of the amendment to the Specific Plan, an Addendum to the EIR (“EIR Addendum”) was prepared, to evaluate project modifications and environmental impacts of the amended Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan area is currently located in Stanislaus County, and the City Council intends to initiate annexation of the Specific Plan area into City limits; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 56375, the City must prezone territory prior to initiating annexation of territory into City limits; and WHEREAS, the City intends to prezone the parcels in the Specific Plan area as a combination of very-low density residential, low-density residential, medium-density residential, high-density residential, general commercial, flex use / general commercial, office, public / semipublic, parks, and open space; and WHEREAS, based on its review and consideration of the staff report, the 2030 General Plan, the Specific Plan, and all testimony presented, in accordance with Oakdale Municipal Code § 36-23.6, the City Council hereby finds as follows:

1. That the proposed zoning districts are consistent with the 2030 General Plan and the Specific Plan adopted by the City.

2. That the site is physically suitable for the density and/or intensity of the proposed zoning districts.

3. That the proposed zoning districts are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

4. That the zoning district changes are required for public convenience and necessity. 235

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The affected parcels within the Specific Plan, as described in Exhibit A, are hereby prezoned to be consistent with the zoning designations depicted in Exhibit B.

2. The Public Services Director, or his or her designee, is directed to amend the City’s Zoning Map to reflect the prezoning adopted by this Ordinance.

3. This Ordinance shall replace and supersede any prezoning ordinance previously adopted for the Specific Plan by the City Council.

4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, and publication of the Ordinance shall occur in a newspaper of general circulation at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date, or a summary of the Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation at least five (5) days prior to adoption and again at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale, held on the 3rd day of March, 2025, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on the ____, day of _____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
236

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

EXHIBIT A
Affected Parcels
237

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

EXHIBIT B
Prezoning
238

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment C
City Council Resolution No. 2025-XX – Initiation of Annexation Application 239

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

REORGANIZATION OF THE SIERRA POINTE SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale (“City”) seeks to file an application with the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission (“Stanislaus LAFCO”) to initiate proceedings for adjustment to the boundaries specified herein, pursuant to the Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with California Government Code § 56000; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”), as amended, which provides a comprehensive land use and regulatory structure for approximately 297 acres located outside existing City limits in Stanislaus County; and WHEREAS, the City, as the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2018122052) (“EIR”), and an accompanying Addendum to the EIR (“EIR Addendum”), evaluating and mitigating the environmental impacts of the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City’s existing Sphere of Influence (“SOI”) encompasses the entire Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the City proposes to annex and reorganize the boundaries of the Specific Plan into City limits (“Reorganization Proposal”); and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan area is contiguous to City limits, is within the City’s SOI, and implements the goals, policies, and programs of the City’s 2030 General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it will be able to provide the public facilities and services to support the buildout of the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to authorize City staff to file an application with Stanislaus LAFCO to annex the Specific Plan area into City limits and allow for future development of the area consistent with the Specific Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Oakdale City Council as follows:

1. The City Council hereby authorizes City staff to file an application with Stanislaus LAFCO to annex the Specific Plan area into City limits, as described and depicted in Exhibit A attached and incorporated hereto, and to take all actions necessary and incidental to accomplish the reorganization of the Specific Plan area. 240

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
{CW090225.1}
4928-9460-8662, v. 6

2. The City Council hereby requests that the Reorganization Proposal be subject to the following terms and conditions:
a. That the effective date of the Reorganization Proposal be the date on which Stanislaus LAFCO records the certificate of completion for the annexation of the Specific Plan area.

3. For any parcels in the Specific Plan area currently encumbered by active Williamson Act contracts (Government Code § 51200 et seq.), the City Council hereby directs City staff, in accordance with state law, to exercise the City’s rights to terminate or not renew the active Williamson Act contracts upon annexation of the Specific Plan area into City limits.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 3rd DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
241

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
{CW090225.1}
4928-9460-8662, v. 6

EXHIBIT A
242

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
{CW090225.1}
4928-9460-8662, v. 6
243

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
{CW090225.1}
4928-9460-8662, v. 6
244

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX (Continued)
{CW090225.1}
4928-9460-8662, v. 6
245

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment D
Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-01 and 2025-02
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment E
Sierra Pointe Specific Plan (Amended)
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment F
Addendum to the EIR for Sierra Pointe Specific Plan
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment G
Comment Letters from Oakdale Irrigation District and Oakdale Joint Unified School District 664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment H
FAQ Sheet and Notification Letter
675
676
677
678
679
680

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Attachment I
Optional Land Use Plan
681

CITY OF OAKDALE

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Sierra Pointe Specific Plan: Prezone, Annexation, GPA, and SPA 2017-17 MEETING DATE: March 3, 2025
REPORT DATE: February 25, 2025
Optional Land Use Plan
682

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: Monday, March 3, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Jerry Ramar, Chief of Police
Subject: Introduction of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 21 – Titled Oakdale Entertainment Zone – to the Oakdale Municipal Code, Designating 3rd Avenue from E to F Street an Entertainment Zone During the Oakdale Morning Market.

I. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt an Ordinance designating 3rd Avenue between E and F Streets as an entertainment zone on Saturdays from May through September, conditional on the presence of the Oakdale Morning Market.

II. BACKGROUND
The City of Oakdale has an active Morning Market from May through September, attracting significant foot traffic for local businesses and morning market vendors.

This Oakdale Morning Market is a City cosponsored event. To enhance the market experience and support local businesses, it is proposed to designate the area on Third Avenue between E and F Street as an entertainment zone while the Oakdale Morning Market is active. This aligns with California's legislative framework under SB 969.

In the past, businesses on 3rd Avenue have obtained Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) catering licenses, allowing them to serve alcohol within the Oakdale Morning Market area. Designating this area as an entertainment zone will eliminate the need for local businesses to obtain catering licenses.

II. DISCUSSION
Since 2023, there has been an Oakdale Morning Market on Third Avenue, between E Street and F Street. The morning market is from 8 AM to 11 AM and has seen great success. Currently, businesses within the area obtain weekly ABC catering permits, which allow them to sell alcoholic beverages to customers within the morning market area.

Senate Bill 969 (SB 969), signed into law on September 28, 2024, authorizes California cities and counties to establish "Entertainment Zones." Within these zones, local bars, restaurants, and establishments can sell alcoholic beverages for outdoor consumption in designated public areas such as streets and sidewalks. The bill aims AGENDA ITEM 10.2
683

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Introduction of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 21 to the Oakdale City Code MEETING DATE: March 3rd, 2025
to revitalize downtown areas and support local businesses by encouraging public gatherings and events, which matches the goals of the Oakdale Morning Market.

Key provisions include:

Local Ordinance Requirement: Cities and counties must pass an ordinance to establish an Entertainment Zone, specifying its boundaries and operational hours.

Law Enforcement Consultation: Before enacting such an ordinance, local governments are required to notify law enforcement and seek feedback on proposed boundaries and operational details.

Biennial Review: Established zones must undergo a review every two years to assess their operation, with reports made available to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon request.

Licensee Participation: Licensed establishments within the zone can permit patrons to leave with open containers for consumption within the zone, provided they adhere to specific conditions, such as prohibiting glass or metal containers and ensuring alcoholic beverages are purchased only within the zone.

The proposed ordinance would:

1. Allow local businesses to sell alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption in designated containers within the entertainment zone.

2. Increase foot traffic and economic activity within the downtown area.

3. Include public health and safety measures in collaboration with local law enforcement.

III. FISCAL IMPACTS
Minimal administrative costs are anticipated for implementing the ordinance.

Additional revenue may be generated through increased market attendance and local business activity.

IV. ALTERNATIVES

1. Introduce the Ordinance and waive the first reading;

2. Continue the introduction of the Ordinance for the next reading to the next regular City Council meeting, with changes or revisions provided by the City Council;

3. Reject the introduction of the ordinance for the first reading. 684

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: Introduction of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 21 to the Oakdale City Code MEETING DATE: March 3rd, 2025
V. RECOMMENDATION
City of Oakdale staff recommends the City Council introduce the Ordinance adding Chapter 21 – Oakdale Entertainment Zone – to the Oakdale City Code, designating Third Avenue between E and F Street on Saturdays from May through September, conditional on the Oakdale Morning Market being present an entertainment zone.

VI. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Ordinance No. XXXX
Attachment B: Entertainment Zone Map
685

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE INTRODUCING CHAPTER 21 TO THE OAKDALE MUNICIPAL CODE DESIGNATING AN ENTERTAINMENT ZONE ON 3RD AVENUE BETWEEN E AND F STREETS ON SATURDAYS FROM 8 AM THROUGH 11 AM FROM MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER

IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OAKDALE MORNING MARKET
The CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 969 (SB 969) authorizes California cities to establish entertainment zones for the purpose of enhancing local economic activity and promoting public engagement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale desires to designate 3rd Avenue between E and F Streets as an entertainment zone on Saturdays from May through September in conjunction with the Oakdale Morning Market; and
WHEREAS, this entertainment zone will allow for the consumption of alcoholic beverages purchased from participating businesses in non-glass, non-metal containers during designated times; and
WHEREAS, the City has consulted with local law enforcement to ensure public health and safety within the designated entertainment zone; and WHEREAS, this ordinance complies with all requirements outlined in SB 969.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Chapter 22
Entertainment Zone
Section 22-1. Designation of Entertainment Zone
The area of 3rd Avenue between E and F Streets is hereby designated as an entertainment zone.

Section 22-2. Permitted Hours and Dates
The entertainment zone will operate on Saturdays from 8:00 AM to 11:00 AM during the months of May through September, provided the Morning Market is active.

Section 22.3. Restrictions on Alcohol Consumption
Alcoholic beverages must be purchased from participating licensed businesses within the entertainment zone and consumed in approved non-glass, non-metal containers.
686

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
Section 22.4Age Verification
Licensed businesses must implement measures to ensure that alcoholic beverages are only served to individuals aged 21 or older.

Section 22.5. Biennial Review
The City shall review the operation of the entertainment zone every two years to ensure compliance with public safety and health standards.

Section 22.6. Restrictions and Provisions
The Chief of Police is granted the authority to establish and enforce restrictions and provisions as necessary to ensure the safety and security of the designated entertainment zone. This includes but is not limited to, modifying operating hours, restricting access, setting alcohol consumption guidelines, and deploying additional law enforcement resources as required. Additionally, the Chief of Police may mandate the use of a private security company, not at the expense of the City, to provide supplemental security services within the entertainment zone when deemed necessary to address public safety concerns. These measures may be implemented at the Chief's discretion, based on assessments of potential risks, to maintain a safe and orderly environment for all participants and visitors.

This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption, provided it is published in a newspaper of general circulation at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a public hearing held on the 3rd day of March 2025, given a second reading on the 17th day of March 2025, and upon motion by Council Member _________ second by Council Member _________ moved for the adoption of said ordinance by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tom Hallinan, City Attorney
SIGNED:

Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
687

CITY OF OAKDALE
Atachment B: Entertainment Zone Map
688

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
March 3, 2025
Date: March 3, 2025
To: Mayor Bairos and City Council
From: Bryan Whitemyer, City Manager
Subject: Consider a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Oakdale Approving Adjustments to the Capital Facility Fees (CFF) in accordance with Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq.

I. BACKGROUND:

In January of 2016 the Oakdale City Council approved a resolution adopting a Capital Facility Fee Nexus Study and updated the City’s Capital Facilities Fees in Accordance with Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq. The staff report and CFF Nexus Study that was approved at that time has been included with this staff report as Attachment B.

The Nexus Study allows for Fee Adjustments as follows:
“The Fee Program may be adjusted in future years to reflect revised facility standards, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised costs, inclusion of additional capital improvements, or changes in demographics or the land use plan. In addition to such adjustments, the fees should be inflated each year by the Engineering News Record 20- City Construction Cost Index.” The City has never exercised this provision of the Nexus Study.

In order to ensure that the fees collected are adequate to fund necessary capital improvement projects staff recommends making the allowed adjustments for the eight-year period spanning from April 2017 to April 2024.

The Engineering Construction Cost Index increase is as follows:

AGENDA ITEM 10.3
689

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
March 3, 2025
The total amount of the CFF adjustments by year:

The proposed CFF Fee adjustments by category using the April 2024 Engineering Construction Cost Index:
690

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
March 3, 2025
II. DISCUSSION:

What are Capital Facility Fees?
Capital Facility Fees (CFFs) are charges assessed to developers, property owners, or businesses in Oakdale, to fund the development, expansion, and maintenance of public infrastructure and facilities that are needed due to the growth and development of the City. These fees are designed to ensure that growth and development contribute to the costs of building and maintaining essential public services, such as water, sewer, parks, roads, and public safety facilities. The fees are typically collected at the time of development or new construction and are allocated toward the improvement of the city's infrastructure to accommodate increased demand due to growth.

Over the last several years we have seen significant increases in construction and material costs.

Raising the CFF is necessary so that the City collects adequate funds so that infrastructure improvement needed because of growth can be constructed.

III. FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed CFF increases are shown below:

The fee increases will add costs to developers trying to build homes or businesses in Oakdale.

However, these fees are necessary to build essential public improvement like water, sewer, parks, roads and public safety facilities to mitigate the impacts of new growth.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
Staff Recommends the City Council of the City of Oakdale adopt Resolution No. 2024-__ approving adjustments to the Capital Facility Fees (CFF) in accordance with 2016 CFF Nexus Study Fee Increases by Development Type
Single Family
(per Unit)
Multi-Family
(per Unit)
Retail
(per Bldg. SF)
Office/Commercial
(per Bldg. SF)
Industrial
(per Bldg. SF)
January 2016 $27,926.00 $16,268.00 $9.78 $7.71 $4.71
April 2024 $36,763.75 $21,416.34 $12.88 $10.15 $6.20
Fee Increase by Unit or
Square Footage $8,837.75 $5,148.34 $3.10 $2.44 $1.49
CFF Fees
691

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
March 3, 2025
and Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq and as found in Attachment A.

V. ATTACHMENT
A: Draft Resolution
B: January 19, 2016 Staff Report and Resolution for the 2016 CFF Nexus Study 692

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
March 3, 2025
Attachment A: Draft Resolution
693

IN THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL

APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CAPITAL FACILITY FEES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 NEXUS STUDY AND CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE XIII OF THE OAKDALE MUNICIPAL CODE AND GOVERNMENT CODE 6600 ET SEQ
THE CITY OF OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Oakdale approved a resolution adopting a Capital Facility Fee Nexus Study in January 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study provided provisions to inflate the fees each year by the Engineering News Record 20-City Construction Cost Index; and WHEREAS, to ensure that the fees collected by new development are adequate to fund necessary capital facility improvements fee adjustments are needed; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Construction Cost Index has risen as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council directs City Staff to raise the Capital Facility Fees for the City of Oakdale utilizing the Engineering Construction Cost Index year-over-year increase from April 2017 to April 2024; and
694

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX(Continued)
SUBJECT: CFF Adjustments
WHEREAS, the annual adjustments are as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE hereby adjusts the Capital Facility Fees by category as shown in the table below:
the City Manager to Execute a Two-Year Agreement with One, One Year Potential Extension with Bear Electrical Solutions LLC, for Traffic Signal Maintenance Services Funded from General Fund (110) Street Lights/Traffic Signals. 695

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2025-XXX(Continued)
SUBJECT: CFF Adjustments
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF MARCH, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (0)
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None (0)
SIGNED:

ATTEST: Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
696

CITY OF OAKDALE

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: January 19, 2016
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Thom Clark, Public Services Director
Subject: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Study and Updating the City’s Capital Facilities Fees in Accordance with Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq.

I. BACKGROUND
The City last updated its Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Nexus Study and CFF schedule in 2009. Since 2009, the City has adopted a new 2030 General Plan.

New Master Plans were subsequently developed for Water, Wastewater, Streets and Storm Drainage to recognize the changes between the City’s 2015 and 2030 General Plan.

As the City continues to develop, backbone infrastructure, facilities, and equipment will be needed to serve the new development areas. Since these facilities are required as a direct result of development, the cost of these facilities should be borne by new development.

Future development in the City is planned for the East F Street Corridor Specific Plan, the South Industrial Specific Plan, Area 3 of the recently annexed portion of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan, as well as vacant or infill land throughout the City. Additionally, portions of the Crane Crossing Specific Plan, as well as the Sierra Pointe Specific Plan are currently outside of the City limits but are planned for annexation within the life of the 2030 General Plan. These areas will provide future residential and nonresidential development potential for the City.

II. DISCUSSION
This Capital Facility Fee Nexus Study updates the City’s Capital Facilities Fee Updated Nexus Study dated April 6, 2009. The Nexus Study contains the following major changes from the 2009 Nexus Study:
 The City’s planned development areas and planning horizon have significantly changed from those in the 2009 Nexus Study. The 2009 Nexus Study includes City Planning Areas 1-6 and 8-11. The ten planning areas included approximately 3,200 acres of residential and non-residential uses with an estimated development potential of over 11,000 residential units and 12.8 million square foot (sq. ft.) of commercial or industrial building space. The development area for this 697

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: CFF Nexus Study
MEETING DATE: January 19, 2016
Nexus Study is significantly smaller and includes the previously mentioned four specific plan areas, as well as vacant and infill land in the City. Please see Attachment C for a comparison of the old and new CFF Boundary (General Plan) areas.
 The City Council recently adopted Water, Wastewater, Streets, and Storm Drainage Master Plans. The facilities and costs recommended in the four Master Plans are sized based on the City’s reduced development area of the 2030 General Plan.
 The City’s updated Capital Improvement Program is detailed in the four Master Plans and shown in this Nexus Study in Table B-1 in Appendix B.

The facilities and costs in the Master Plans have been revised to accommodate the City’s smaller development area. The anticipated CFF revenue has dropped from approximately $165 million in the 2009 Nexus Study to approximately $67 million in the current Nexus Study. The resultant fees have not necessarily dropped proportionately due to a significant drop in residential and non-residential growth reflected in the new Master Plans (from 11,000 to 3,000 residential units and from 12.8 million sq. ft. of commercial/industrial space to 5.7 million sq. ft. respectively).
 The 2009 Nexus Study includes four separate fee zones for the Storm Drainage CFF due to planned storm water systems to serve separate areas of the City. The recently adopted Storm Drainage Master Plan contemplates a single city-wide storm drainage system and therefore this Nexus Study contains only one storm drainage fee.
 The 2009 Nexus Study assumed a redevelopment agency would have funds available to reduce the fees for some infill land use categories. AB 26 dissolved redevelopment agencies so the proposed Nexus Study does not include this revenue stream as a source to reduce fees.

The proposed new Capital Facility Fees, based on the 2030 General Plan are shown in the following Table A-1 from the Study. The proposed Capital Facility Fees bear a reasonable relationship to the projected impacts of new development and are necessary to mitigate those impacts.
698

CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: CFF Nexus Study
MEETING DATE: January 19, 2016
Storm Parks & General Administration Total
Land Use Street Wastewater Water Drainage Police Fire Recreation Government 2.0% CFF Residential
Single Family $4,865 $2,009 $7,282 $1,027 $982 $1,230 $8,917 $1,066 $548 $27,926 Multi-Family $3,227 $1,659 $2,438 $494 $655 $820 $5,945 $711 $319 $16,268 Non-Residential
Retail $5.42 $0.89 $1.62 $0.83 $0.25 $0.31 n/a $0.27 $0.19 $9.78 Office/Commercial $4.61 $0.31 $0.90 $0.64 $0.33 $0.41 n/a $0.36 $0.15 $7.71 Industrial $2.77 $0.17 $0.51 $0.69 $0.14 $0.18 n/a $0.16 $0.09 $4.71 Per Unit
Per Bldg. SF
This table is also included as Exhibit 1 of the attached resolution.

The new proposed fees compare favorably with other local municipalities, especially the non-residential fees, as shown in Attachment B to this staff report.

III. FISCAL IMPACT
The Nexus Study and resultant Capital Facility Fees are intended to offset the impact of new growth and development in the City and are therefore revenue neutral to the City’s budget.

IV. RECOMMENDATION
Move that the City Council adopt the Resolution adopting a Capital Facilities Fee Nexus Study and updating the City’s Capital Facilities Fees in accordance with Chapter 7, Article XIII of the Oakdale Municipal Code and Government Code 6600 Et Seq.

V. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2016-__
Exhibit 1: Table A-1 Fee Program Summary
Attachment B: Fee Comparison Table
Attachment C: CFF Boundary Comparison
699
Commercial Fee Comparison:

Oakdale Difference Average Riverbank Modesto Patterson Manteca Ripon Waterford Streets $ 5.42 $ (0.53) $ 5.95 $ 5.57 $ 9.91 $ 2.11 $ 5.27 $ 7.85 $ 4.99 Sewer $ 0.89 $ (2.78) $ 3.67 $ 1.65 $ 1.86 $ 2.11 $ 4.57 $ 2.96 $ 8.86 Water $ 1.80 $ (1.76) $ 3.56 $ 2.07 $ 1.76 $ 6.34 $ 2.28 $ 1.84 $ 7.09 Storm Drain $ 0.83 $ (0.84) $ 1.67 $ 4.25 $ ‐ $ 3.62 $ 0.64 $ 1.52 $ ‐ Police $ 0.19 $ 0.08 $ 0.11 $ ‐ $ 0.24 $ 0.04 $ ‐ $ 0.12 $ 0.25 Fire $ 0.35 $ (0.18) $ 0.53 $ 0.49 $ 0.08 $ 0.35 $ 0.20 $ 1.67 $ 0.37 Parks & Rec $ ‐ $ (0.13) $ 0.13 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 0.80 $ ‐ Government $ 0.27 $ (0.24) $ 0.51 $ 0.37 $ 0.14 $ 0.23 $ 1.23 $ 0.60 $ 0.51 Other $ ‐ $ (0.10) $ 0.10 $ ‐ $ 0.20 $ ‐ $ 0.10 $ 0.27 $ ‐ Admin $ 0.20 $ 0.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.70 $ 0.27 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 0.21 $ 9.95 $ (6.48) $ 16.43 $ 15.10 $ 14.46 $ 14.80 $ 14.29 $ 17.63 $ 22.28 Residential Fee Comparison:

Oakdale Difference Average Riverbank Modesto Patterson Manteca Ripon Waterford Streets $ 4,865.00 $ 27.00 $ 4,838.00 $ 2,983.00 $ 6,592.00 $ 3,879.00 $ 2,252.00 $ 7,088.00 $ 6,234.00 Sewer $ 2,009.00 $ (3,991.83) $ 6,000.83 $ 3,063.00 $ 7,213.00 $ 4,307.00 $ 6,950.00 $ 4,127.00 $ 10,345.00 Water $ 8,071.00 $ (914.67) $ 8,985.67 $ 7,024.00 $ 8,645.00 $ 13,755.00 $ 7,447.00 $ 9,957.00 $ 7,086.00 Storm Drain $ 1,027.00 $ (1,535.00) $ 2,562.00 $ 6,922.00 $ ‐ $ 5,379.00 $ 433.00 $ 2,638.00 $ ‐ Police $ 727.00 $ 383.67 $ 343.33 $ ‐ $ 896.00 $ 70.00 $ ‐ $ 541.00 $ 553.00 Fire $ 1,374.00 $ 455.83 $ 918.17 $ 576.00 $ 382.00 $ 457.00 $ 486.00 $ 2,942.00 $ 666.00 Parks & Rec $ 7,118.00 $ 418.67 $ 6,699.33 $ 3,912.00 $ 5,461.00 $ 10,118.00 $ 2,447.00 $ 14,174.00 $ 4,084.00 Government $ 1,066.00 $ (773.67) $ 1,839.67 $ 1,416.00 $ 504.00 $ 1,073.00 $ 4,363.00 $ 2,659.00 $ 1,023.00 Other $ (2,155.83) $ 2,155.83 $ ‐ $ 672.00 $ 607.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 10,406.00 $ ‐ Admin $ 525.00 $ 197.17 $ 327.83 $ 1,266.00 $ 286.00 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 415.00 $ 26,782.00 $ (7,888.67) $ 34,670.67 $ 27,162.00 $ 30,651.00 $ 39,645.00 $ 25,628.00 $ 54,532.00 $ 30,406.00 Attachment B
700
Attachment C
2009 CFF Boundary and 2015 CFF Boundary Comparison
701
555)University)Ave,)Suite)280)•)Sacramento,)CA)95825
Phone:)l916p)561-0890)•)Fax:)l916p)561-0891
www.goodwinconsultinggroup.net

CAPITAL FACILITIES FEE (CFF)

UPDATED NEXUS STUDY

CITY OF OAKDALE
JANUARY 8, 2016
702

CITY OF OAKDALE

CAPITAL FACILITIES FEE

UPDATED NEXUS STUDY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Population and Land Use Categories ...................................................................................5 III. Infrastructure and Public Facilities ......................................................................................9 IV. Fee Methodology ...............................................................................................................12 V. Streets/Public Works Fee ...................................................................................................15 VI. Wastewater Fee ..................................................................................................................20 VII. Water Fee ...........................................................................................................................24 VIII. Storm Drainage Fee ...........................................................................................................29 IX. Police Fee ...........................................................................................................................33 X. Fire Fee ..............................................................................................................................37 XI. Parks and Recreation Fee ...................................................................................................41 XII. General Government Fee ...................................................................................................44 XIII. Fee Summary .....................................................................................................................48 XIV. Ongoing Administration of the Fee Program.....................................................................49 703

CITY OF OAKDALE

CAPITAL FACILITIES FEE

UPDATED NEXUS STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Appendix A: Capital Facilities Fee Program Calculations

1. Table A-1: Program Fee Summary
a. Development Impact Fee Comparison – Total Fee Program Fee b. Impact Fee Comparison – Single Family Residential
c. Impact Fee Comparison – Multi Family Residential
d. Impact Fee Comparison – Retail
e. Impact Fee Comparison – Office/Commercial
f. Impact Fee Comparison – Industrial

2. Table A-2: Land Use Development Estimates

3. 4. Table A-3: Land Use Assumptions

5. Table A-4: Capital Improvement Plan - Cost Summary

6. Table A-5: Streets/Public Works Fee Calculation

7. Table A-6: Wastewater Fee Calculation

8. Table A-7: Water Fee Calculation

9. Table A-8: Storm Drainage Fee Calculation

10. Table A-9: Police Fee Calculation

11. Table A-10: Fire Fee Calculation

12. Table A-11: Parks and Recreation Fee Calculation

13. Table A-12: General Government Fee Calculation
704

CITY OF OAKDALE

CAPITAL FACILITIES FEE

UPDATED NEXUS STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Appendix B: Capital Improvement Program and Supporting Data

14. Table B-1: Capital Improvement Program

15. 16. Table B-2: Park and Recreation Facilities Summary

17. 18. Table B-3: Detailed Park Development Costs
Appendix C:

19. Comparison of 2009 CFF Boundary to 2015 CFF Boundary 705
City of Oakdale i
Capital Facilities Fee

CITY OF OAKDALE

CAPITAL FACILITIES FEE

UPDATED NEXUS STUDY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION
The City of Oakdale (the “City”) lies in the northeastern portion of Stanislaus County, approximately 11 miles northeast of Modesto in California’s agricultural Central Valley.

Regionally, Sacramento is located approximately 60 miles to the north and San Francisco is approximately 125 miles to the west of the City. The California Department of Finance estimates that the City’s population as of January 2015 is 21,588.

Future development in the City is planned for the East “F” Street Corridor Specific Plan, the South Oakdale Industrial Specific Plan, as well as vacant or infill land throughout the City. Additionally, two specific plan areas that are currently outside of the City limits, the Crane Crossing and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan areas, are to be annexed to the City (a portion of Crane Crossing, Area 3, has been annexed to the City at this time). Crane Crossing is contiguous to the City’s western boundary and Sierra Pointe is contiguous to the City’s eastern boundary. These areas will provide future residential and nonresidential development potential for the City.

PURPOSE OF STUDY
This Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Updated Nexus Study (the “Nexus Study) updates the City’s Capital Facilities Fee Updated Nexus Study, dated April 6, 2009 (the “2009 Nexus Study”). This Nexus Study contains the following major changes from the 2009 Nexus Study:
 The City’s planned development areas and planning horizon have significantly changed from those in the 2009 Nexus Study. The development area for this Nexus Study, which is referred 706
City of Oakdale ii
Capital Facilities Fee
to as the Fee Program Area in this Nexus Study, is significantly smaller and includes the City’s four specific plan areas and the remaining vacant and infill land in the City.  The City Council recently adopted street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans.

The facilities recommended in the four master plans are sized based on the City’s reduced development areas mentioned in the prior paragraph.

 The City’s updated Capital Improvement Program (the “CIP”), is detailed in Tables B-1 through B-3 in Appendix B. This updated CIP is based on the City’s recently adopted street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans.
 The 2009 Nexus Study includes four separate fee zones due to separate storm drainage systems that were planned to serve four separate areas in the City. However, the storm drainage facilities included in the current Storm Drainage Master Plan will serve all future development in the City and therefore, this Nexus Study has only one storm drainage fee.  The 2009 Nexus Study assumed RDA funds would be available and that the City would use these funds to reduce the fees for some infill land use categories. However, AB 26 dissolved RDA funding in 2012 and therefore, this Nexus Study does not include RDA revenue as a funding source to reduce fees.
 The Industrial land use fee category which included subcategories Industrial (L-M), Industrial (M-1), and Industrial (Infill) in the 2009 Nexus Study has been consolidated into the just one Industrial land use category in this Nexus Study.

Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc. has prepared this Nexus Study to be compliant with the regulations set forth in AB 1600, ensuring that a rational nexus exists between future development in the Fee Program Area and the use and need of the proposed facilities. This Nexus Study will demonstrate that a reasonable relationship exists between the amount of each impact fee and the cost of the facilities attributable to the type of development that will be required to pay the impact fee. 707
City of Oakdale iii
Capital Facilities Fee

FEES INCLUDED IN THE STUDY
This Nexus Study determines the development impact fees for the following:
 street facilities
 wastewater facilities
 water facilities
 storm drainage facilities
 police facilities
 fire facilities
 park and recreation facilities, and
 general government facilities
The fees in this Nexus Study are established to mitigate the impacts on the City from future development in the Fee Program Area. Updated facilities costs as well as the addition of new facilities to the City’s CIP have created the need to update the 2009 Nexus Study. 708
City of Oakdale iv
Capital Facilities Fee

FACILITIES AND COSTS
The Fee Program Area will fund various types of infrastructure, public facilities, and equipment that will serve future development within its boundaries. The City has updated the CIP and the associated costs; these facilities and their itemized costs can be found in Appendix B of this report.

Table ES-1 below summarizes the City’s CIP costs by facility category.

Table ES-1
Capital Improvement Program - Cost Summary
Other City CFF Program
Facility Category Total Cost Funds Funding
Streets $31,842,745 $0 $31,842,745
Wastewater $24,425,202 $17,189,635 $7,235,567
Water Improvements $33,202,475 $13,482,500 $19,719,975
Storm Drainage $6,365,349 $0 $6,365,349
Police $5,517,000 $1,983,000 $3,534,000
Fire (1) $11,700,000 $7,241,000 $4,459,000
Parks $22,855,440 $0 $22,855,440
General Government $3,836,000 $0 $3,836,000
Total (rounded) $139,744,000 $39,896,000 $99,848,000
(1) Cost of fire facilities excludes the value of existing western fire station and engine but includes the remaining $2.0 million debt on the station. 709
City of Oakdale v
Capital Facilities Fee

SUMMARY OF THE FEE PROGRAM FEES
Table ES-2 summarizes fees in the Fee Program as calculated in this Nexus Study. An Administration Fee, equal to two percent (2.0%) of all other fees, is included to pay for administration and maintenance of the Fee Program.

TABLE ES-2

FEE PROGRAM SUMMARY

Table ES-3
Development Impact Fee Comparison
Land Use Category
Current
City Impact Fees
Proposed
City Impact Fees
Percent
Change
Single Family $29,642 $27,926 -5.8%
Multi-Family $16,148 $16,268 0.7%

Retail $10.40 $9.78 -5.9%
Office/Commercial $9.73 $7.71 -20.7%
Industrial $5.23 $4.71 -9.9%
As shown in the table, the proposed fees represent a reduction compared to the City’s current fees.

Detailed impact fee comparison Tables can be found in Tables A-1a through A-1f in Appendix A.

FEE ADJUSTMENTS
The Fee Program may be adjusted in future years to reflect revised facility standards, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised costs, inclusion of additional capital improvements, or changes in demographics or the land use plan. In addition to such adjustments, the fees should be inflated each year by the Engineering News Record 20-City Construction Cost Index.
711
City of Oakdale 1
Capital Facilities Fee Update
I. Introduction
The City of Oakdale (the “City”) lies in the northeastern portion of Stanislaus County, approximately 11 miles northeast of Modesto in California’s agricultural Central Valley.

As the City continues to develop, backbone infrastructure, facilities, and equipment will be required to serve the new development areas. Since these facilities are needed as a direct result of development in the new areas, the cost of these facilities should be borne exclusively by development that occurs there. Although the exact funding strategy is not known at this time, much of the funding for these facilities will come from development impact fees.

A. Purpose of Study
This Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Updated Nexus Study (the “Nexus Study) updates the City’s Capital Facilities Fee Updated Nexus Study, dated April 6, 2009 (the “2009 Nexus Study”). This Nexus Study contains the following major changes from the 2009 Nexus Study:
 The City’s planned development areas and planning horizon have significantly changed from those in the 2009 Nexus Study. The 2009 Nexus Study includes City Planning Areas 1–6 and 712
City of Oakdale 2
Capital Facilities Fee Update
8–11. These ten planning areas included approximately 3,200 acres of residential and nonresidential land uses with an estimated development potential of over 11,000 residential units and 12.8 million square feet of commercial or industrial building space. The development area for this Nexus Study, which is referred to as the Fee Program Area in this Nexus Study, is significantly smaller and includes the four aforementioned specific plan areas and vacant and infill land in the City. A more detailed discussion of the land use differences between the 2009 Nexus Study and this Nexus Study is presented in Section II of this report.  The City Council recently adopted street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans.

The facilities and costs recommended in the four master plans are sized based on the City’s reduced development areas mentioned in the prior paragraph.

 The City’s updated Capital Improvement Program (the “CIP”), is detailed in Tables B-1 through B-3 in Appendix B. This updated CIP is based on the City’s recently adopted street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans. The facilities and costs in the master plans have been revised to accommodate the City’s smaller development area. For comparative purposes, the total backbone infrastructure cost, including streets, water, wastewater, and storm drainage facilities, planned for funding with CFF revenue was approximately $165 million in the 2009 Nexus Study. In this Nexus Study, approximately $65 million in streets, water, wastewater, and storm drainage facilities are planned to be funded through the Fee Program.
 The 2009 Nexus Study includes four separate fee zones due to separate storm drainage systems that were planned to serve four separate areas in the City. This required separate storm drainage fees to be incorporated into the 2009 fee program. However, the storm drainage facilities included in the current storm drainage master plan will serve all future development in the City and therefore, this Nexus Study has only one storm drainage fee.  The 2009 Nexus Study assumed RDA funds would be available and that the City would use these funds to reduce the fees for some infill land use categories. However, AB 26 dissolved 713
City of Oakdale 3
Capital Facilities Fee Update
RDA funding in 2012 and therefore, this Nexus Study does not include RDA revenue as a funding source to reduce fees.
 The Industrial land use fee category which included subcategories Industrial (L-M), Industrial (M-1), and Industrial (Infill) in the 2009 Nexus Study has been consolidated into the just one Industrial land use category in this Nexus Study.

B. Impact Fee Nexus Requirements (AB 1600)
Assembly Bill 1600 (herein “AB 1600”), which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, created Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code. AB 1600, also referred to as the Mitigation Fee Act, requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee.

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put.

3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between:

A. The fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

B. The need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.

C. The amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

As stated above, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate that all fees in this updated Fee Program comply with AB 1600. The assumptions, fee methodologies, and facility standards, costs, and cost 714
City of Oakdale 4
Capital Facilities Fee Update
allocation factors that were used to establish the nexus between the fees and the development on which they will be levied are summarized in the subsequent sections of this report.

C. Organization of Report
The remainder of this report has been organized into the following sections:

Section II Defines the demographic and land use development assumptions used in the detailed calculations of the Fee Program
Section III Summarizes the infrastructure categories and costs in the City’s updated CIP Section IV Provides a detailed explanation of the fee methodologies used to calculate the various individual fees in the Fee Program
Sections V-XII Provides the detailed calculations for streets, wastewater, water, storm drainage, police, fire, park and recreation, and general government fees Section XIII Summarizes the individual fee rates developed in this Nexus Study Section XIV Addresses future fee adjustments, fee implementation, annual administrative duties, fee credits or reimbursements, and other relevant items 715
City of Oakdale 5
Capital Facilities Fee Update
II. Population and Land Use Categories
A. Population
Table II-1 on page 7 shows existing and future land uses, population, and employment estimates for the City. The California Department of Finance estimates that as of January 2015 the City had 21,588 residents. Additionally, City planning documents estimate that the City has approximately

5.5 million square feet of commercial and industrial building space with just under 6,000 jobs.

The City’s future development areas have been significantly revised down from those in the 2009 Nexus Study. The 2009 Nexus Study includes City Planning Areas 1–6 and 8–11. These ten planning areas include approximately 3,200 acres of residential and nonresidential land uses with an estimated development potential of over 11,000 residential units and 12.8 million square feet of commercial or industrial building space.

B. Fee Program Area
The Fee Program Area in this Nexus Study includes approximately 900 acres of residential and nonresidential land uses with an estimated development potential of approximately 3,000 residential units and 5.7 million square feet of commercial/industrial building space. A map comparing the 2009 Nexus Study fee area to proposed fee area in this Nexus Study is included in Appendix C of this report. The City’s infrastructure master plans estimate that residential development will fully build out by about 2040, while commercial/industrial development may span an additional two or more decades beyond this time.

The Fee Program Area includes four specific plan areas and the remaining vacant and infill land within the City limits. At build out of the Fee Program Area, it is estimated that an additional 2,992 residential units will be constructed with an estimated 7,689 residents. In addition, build out of the non-residential land uses in the City will produce an estimated 5.7 million square feet of commercial and industrial building space with an estimated 10,464 employees. While build out of the residential 716
City of Oakdale 6
Capital Facilities Fee Update
land uses is estimated to occur by 2040, commercial and industrial land uses are not expected to fully build out until beyond 2060.

The four specific plan areas include the East “F” Street Corridor Specific Plan and the South Oakdale Industrial Specific Plan, which are within the City. Additionally, two specific plan areas that are currently outside of the City limits, the Crane Crossing (a portion of Crane Crossing is currently in the City) and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan areas, are to be annexed to the City. Table A-2 in Appendix A presents estimated build out figures for the Crane Crossing and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan areas as well as the remaining vacant land in the existing city. 717
City of Oakdale 7
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table II-1
Existing and Future Development in the City
Acres Density Units PPH Population
Residential
Single Family 1,328 -- 6,638 -- 18,958
Multi-Family 106 -- 1,381 -- 2,629
Subtotal 1,434 -- 8,019 -- 21,588
BLDG.

Non-Residential Acres FAR SF SF/Emp Employees
Subtotal 769 -- 5,450,000 -- 5,955
Build Out
Residential Acres Density Units PPH Population
Single Family 341 5.00 1,706 3.00 5,118
Multi-Family 99 13.00 1,286 2.00 2,571
Subtotal 440 -- 2,992 -- 7,689
Bldg.

Non-Residential Acres FAR SF SF/Emp Employees
Retail 82 0.25 895,158 400 2,238
Office/Commercial 53 0.32 742,871 300 2,476
Industrial 308 0.30 4,024,944 700 5,750
Subtotal 443 -- 5,662,973 -- 10,464
Residential Units PPH Population
Single Family 8,344 3.00 24,076
Multi-Family 2,667 2.00 5,201
Subtotal 11,011 -- 29,277
BLDG
Non-Residential SF -- Employees
Subtotal 11,112,973 -- 16,419
Incremental Future Development at Build Out of CFF Program Area Totals at Build Out of the City
Existing Development in the City
718
City of Oakdale 8
Capital Facilities Fee Update
B. Land Use Categories
The Mitigation Fee Act, specifically §66001 of the Government Code, requires that a reasonable relationship exist between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which the impact fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the number of residents or employees generated by a particular land use type. Therefore, land use categories have been defined in order to distinguish between relative impacts on facilities. All impact fees in this study have been calculated on a per-dwelling unit basis for residential land use categories and per building square foot for non-residential land use categories.

The following land use categories are identified for purposes of this study:
 Single Family
 Multi-Family
 Retail
 Office/Commercial
 Industrial

The City will make the final determination as to which land use category a particular development will be assigned. The City is authorized to determine the land use category that corresponds most directly to the land use. Alternatively, the City can determine that no land use category adequately corresponds to the development in question and may determine the applicable ad hoc impact fees. 719
City of Oakdale 9
Capital Facilities Fee Update
III. Infrastructure and Public Facilities
The Fee Program will fund various types of infrastructure and public facilities that will serve future development. Infrastructure costs have been developed by City staff and consultants, and detailed facilities and their itemized costs are based on the City’s recently adopted street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans. Detailed facilities and costs can be found in Appendix B; City staff have carefully reviewed and prioritized these facilities based on the primary needs of the City.

Police, fire, parks and general government facilities are based on information provided by the City.

Table III-1 below summarizes the City’s CIP costs by facility category.

Table III-1
Capital Improvement Program - Cost Summary
Other City CFF Program
Facility Category Total Cost Funds Funding
Streets $31,842,745 $0 $31,842,745
Wastewater $24,425,202 $17,189,635 $7,235,567
Water Improvements $33,202,475 $13,482,500 $19,719,975
Storm Drainage $6,365,349 $0 $6,365,349
Police $5,517,000 $1,983,000 $3,534,000
Fire (1) $11,700,000 $7,241,000 $4,459,000
Parks $22,855,440 $0 $22,855,440
General Government $3,836,000 $0 $3,836,000
Total (rounded) $139,744,000 $39,896,000 $99,848,000
(1) Cost of fire facilities excludes the value of existing western fire station and engine but includes the remaining $2.0 million debt on the station.

Table III-1 shows the total cost of the facilities in the CIP is approximately $139.7 million. Funding from other City sources is estimated to account for approximately $39.9 million. Of this amount, approximately $30.7 million from City water and wastewater utility revenues is expected to fund the planned water and wastewater facilities. Additionally, 9.2 million from other City sources will be necessary to fund police and fire facilities. The net facilities cost to be funded through Fee Program revenues is $99.8 million.
720
City of Oakdale 10
Capital Facilities Fee Update
A. Oversizing and Reimbursement
In an effort to ensure that capital facilities are available on a timely basis for future development, the City regularly conditions developers to construct certain facilities upfront, prior to development occurring. In some cases, the cost of these improvements exceeds the developer’s fair-share. As a result, the developer and City enter into a reimbursement agreement that obligates the City to repay the developer for the cost of oversizing the facility or improvement. If the constructed facility benefits future development areas beyond the developer’s area, the other areas should rightfully share in the cost so as to reimburse the original developer.

The City has entered into several such reimbursement agreements with developers of prior development projects in the City. The City and its engineers have reviewed the oversized facilities included in the reimbursement agreements and have determined that several of these oversized facilities will benefit all future development in the City. As a result, the cost of these oversized facilities is included in the CIP for this Nexus Study and in the calculation of the fees in this Fee Program. The oversizing facilities and their costs are identified in Table B-1 of Appendix B and include street, water, wastewater, and storm drainage facilities totaling approximately $9.3 million.

B. Other City Funds
Table III-1 shows approximately $39.9 million in funding to be provided by the City. This includes approximately $17.2 million for wastewater facilities and $13.5 million for water facilities. Because certain water and wastewater facilities in the CIP will provide a citywide benefit, that portion of the total facilities cost is allocated in the respective master plans to be funded by the City’s rate payers through their utility bills. The Water and Wastewater Fees in this Nexus Study include only that portion of the total cost of facilities that will specifically benefit future development; the remainder of the cost of will be funded by utility rate payers.

In addition, police facilities include a new animal shelter with an estimated cost of $2.9 million.

This facility will serve the entire City population and therefore its cost is allocated on a per persons basis between existing and future development in the City. Based on this, existing development’s 721
City of Oakdale 11
Capital Facilities Fee Update
share of the total cost is approximately is approximately 68%, or $2.0 million, and the remaining $0.9 million is allocated to future development.

Lastly, the new fire facilities will include two new fire stations, two fire engines, and a ladder truck.

Since these new facilities will benefit all development in the City, their costs are allocated on a fairshare basis to all development in the City at buildout of the plan area. As a result, $7.2 million of the total cost of all the fire facilities is allocated to existing development in the City. The City will need to fund this $7.2 million amount from sources other than future fire impact fee revenue.

C. RDA Funding
State legislation enacted in February 2012 pursuant to AB 26 dissolved all RDAs in the State. As a result of this action, the City can no longer provide RDA funding to the Fee Program, as was proposed in the 2009 Nexus Study.

D. Backbone Facilities Master Plans
In September 2015, the City Council adopted the streets, water, wastewater, and storm drainage master plans. The master plans identify the facilities needed to serve the build out of all developable land in the existing City and the Crane Crossing and Sierra Pointe Specific Plan areas and are the basis of the backbone facilities and costs incorporated in this Nexus Study. Refer to these master plans for more detailed information on the backbone facilities and costs incorporated in this Nexus Study.
722
City of Oakdale 12
Capital Facilities Fee Update
IV. Fee Methodology
When impact fees are calculated, an analysis must be presented in enough detail to demonstrate that logical and thorough consideration was applied in the process of determining how the fees relate to the impacts from new development. Various findings must be made to ensure that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the development on which that impact fee will be levied. There are several methods of determining impact fees for future development. The choice of the method used depends on the type of facility for which an impact fee is being calculated. Following is a discussion of the two methods used in this Nexus Study to calculate the individual fees in this Fee Program.

A. Plan-Based Fee Methodology
The plan-based fee methodology is used for facilities that must be designed based on future demand projections within a geographic location. Typically, a formal plan such as a specific plan or facilities master plan identifies and supports the level of facilities required to serve the plan area.

For example, the need for transportation-related improvements depends specifically on the projected number of trips that must be accommodated on specific roadways within a geographic location. An analysis of existing facilities, geographic constraints, and current levels of service must be completed in order to identify future facility needs. This information is analyzed in conjunction with a projection of the amount and location of future development in the plan area to determine the adequacy of existing facilities and the demand for new improvements that will be required. The steps to calculate a fee under the plan-based fee methodology include the following:

Step 1 Identify existing development and estimate future demand projections as well as the geographic location of anticipated growth.

Step 2 Determine facilities needed to serve anticipated growth and, if necessary, existing development in the City.
723
City of Oakdale 13
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Step 3 Estimate the gross cost of facilities needed to serve both existing and future development.

Step 4 Subtract the gross cost of any facilities included in the facilities plan that will cure an existing deficiency in service or will serve existing development.

Step 5 Subtract revenues available from alternative funding sources, if any, to identify a net facilities cost that will be allocated to future development.

Step 6 Select the demand variable (e.g., trips generated, gallons per day, persons served, etc.) that will be used to allocate facility costs on a benefit rationale basis; apply demand variable rates to each of the land use categories based on its service demand.

Step 7 Estimate the total demand from future development by multiplying the total number of units/acres/square footage/etc. within each respective land use by its assigned demand variable rate. Sum the totals for all the land uses.

Step 8 Divide the net facilities cost allocated to future development that was calculated in Step 5 by the total demand derived in Step 7 to determine the cost per demand variable (e.g., cost per trip generated, cost per gallon, cost per person served, etc.).

Step 9 Multiply the cost per demand variable determined in Step 8 by the demand variable assigned to each land use category in Step 6 to compute the impact fee for that particular land use category.

The plan-based fee methodology has been used in this report to calculate the street, wastewater, water, storm drainage, parks and recreation, and fire fees. 724
City of Oakdale 14
Capital Facilities Fee Update
B. Standard-Based Fee Methodology
The standard-based fee methodology is used when a consistent facility level of service standard is to be applied to each increment of new development (i.e., residential unit, non-residential square foot) regardless of future demand projections or the geographic location of anticipated growth. The standard to be used in calculating impact fees under this method may be based on an existing City standard or a preferred standard that the City wishes to attain. To the extent a preferred standard is used which is higher than the existing standard, the public agency will need to rely on other sources of funds to mitigate the deficit related to existing development in the City created through the adoption of the higher standard. The steps to calculate a fee under the standard-based fee methodology include the following:

Step 1 Define the existing facility standard (e.g., park acres per 1,000 residents, officers per 1,000 residents) expressed in terms of residents, employees, or other standard appropriate for the type of facility for which a fee is being calculated.

Step 2 Determine a cost for each incremental facility standard identified in Step 1 based on current replacement costs; reduce the facility costs by subtracting alternative funding sources, if applicable.

Step 3 Apply demand variable rates to each of the land uses based on service demand (e.g. persons served, etc.).

Step 4 Multiply the demand variable for each type of land use identified in Step 3 by the cost for each incremental facility standard determined in Step 2 to calculate the impact fee for each of the land use categories.

The standard-based fee methodology has been used in this report to calculate the police and general government fees. Additional detail for each fee the Fe Program is included in the following sections V through XII.
725
City of Oakdale 15
Capital Facilities Fee Update
V. Streets/Public Works Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund the street improvements needed to serve future development through build out of the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Streets/Public Works Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in this report.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Streets/Public Works Fee is to fund streets-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The Streets/Public Works Fee will be used to fund the construction of street improvements identified by the City as necessary to maintain an adequate level of service as the City grows. These facilities are identified in Table B-1 of Appendix B.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, the City’s roadway system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain the existing level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of its roadway system to handle the additional trip generation from new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the street improvements identified in the City’s Street Master Plan will ensure that roadways will be at an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional trips on the City’s roadway system. This will impact the roadway system and as a result, certain roadways will need to be improved in order to expand their capacity. The Streets Master Plan identifies the need to improve specific streets and 726
City of Oakdale 16
Capital Facilities Fee Update
intersections resulting from development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area identified in this Nexus Study.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Street/Public Works Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing the street improvements necessary to serve only the development in the Fee Program Area. Improvements to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the City’s CIP shown in Table B-1. Future residential and non-residential development will be responsible for only the fair-share portion of the total cost based on a proportionate share of trips assigned to the individual land uses.

B. Demand Variable: Peak Hour Trip DUEs
Facility costs for the Street Fee are allocated to future development based on Peak Hour Trip Dwelling Unit Equivalents (herein “Trip DUEs”) modified by a Trip Adjustment Factor. The modified Trip DUEs are shown per unit for both Single Family and Multi-Family residential land uses and per acre for the non-residential categories. The table below presents the different demand variables assigned to each land use.
727
City of Oakdale 17
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table V-1
Peak Hour Trip DUE Rates
Residential Land Uses
Adjusted Peak Hour Trip DUEs
per Unit
Single Family 1.01
Multi-Family 0.67
Non-Residential Land Uses
Adjusted Peak Hour Trip DUEs
per Acre
Retail 12.25
Office/Commercial 13.50
Industrial 7.50
The modified Trip DUEs generated by non-residential land uses reflect an Adjustment Factor to account for the fact that some stops made are pass-by trips rather than trip-ends. For example, a resident may stop at a gas station on the way home from work. The stop at the gas station represents an intermediate stop on the way to the resident’s final destination (his/her house), and therefore, is not counted as an additional new trip end.

C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future trip generation projections, the City estimated the impact on the current roadway system from development in the Fee Program Area. Street and intersection improvements needed to serve future development are identified and quantified in dollar terms and are summarized in Table B-1 in Appendix B. The facilities included in Table B-1 have been prioritized by City staff based the City’s needs. The total cost of these capital improvements is approximately $31.8 million.

Use of the plan-based fee methodology to calculate the Streets/Public Works Fee corresponds with the nature of future development’s impact on the planned roadway system. Only by estimating the 728
City of Oakdale 18
Capital Facilities Fee Update
amount and location of future development can the appropriate improvements be identified and costs quantified. Included in the street facilities cost is the cost of street widening, intersection improvements, signalization, and right-of-way acquisition. Facilities have been sized to accommodate the additional trips that will be generated based on development in the Fee Program Area.

D. Reimbursement Cost for Oversized Facilities
The total cost of street improvements to be funded by the Fee Program is approximately $31.8 million. Of this total amount, $7.4 million is reimbursement for oversizing of prior street improvements that the City and its engineers have determined will benefit all future development in the Fee Program Area. Table B-1in Appendix B identifies the improvements and costs of prior facilities oversizing.

E. Calculation of Streets/Public Works Fee
Table A-5 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Streets/Public Works Fee. The $31.8 million total cost of the street improvements is allocated to future development in the Fee Program Area based on trip generation from the land uses in the Fee Program Area. Table A-5 shows the total trips generated by both residential and non-residential development at build out is estimated to be 6,612 Trip DUEs. Dividing the total cost by the total number of trip DUEs produces a cost per new trip DUE of $4,816.

The cost per Trip DUE is then multiplied by the trip DUE assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per unit for residential development or building square foot for non-residential development.
729
City of Oakdale 19
Capital Facilities Fee Update
F. Streets/Public Works Fee
The bottom section of Table A-5 shows the calculation of the Streets/Public Works Fee. Applying the $4,816 cost per trip DUE to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Street/Public Works Fees:
 $4,865 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $3,227 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $5.42 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $4.61 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $2.77 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 730
City of Oakdale 20
Capital Facilities Fee Update
VI. Wastewater Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund the wastewater improvements needed to serve future development through build out of the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the wastewater fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in Section I.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Wastewater Fee is to fund wastewater-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development in the Fee Program Area.

Identify the use of the fee. The wastewater fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of wastewater facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. These facilities are identified in Table B-1 of Appendix B.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, the City’s wastewater system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the wastewater facilities identified in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide at an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional demand on the City’s wastewater system. This will impact the wastewater system and as a result, certain facilities will need to be improved in order to 731
City of Oakdale 21
Capital Facilities Fee Update
expand their capacity. The Wastewater Master Plan identifies the need to improve specific wastewater facilities as a result of development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area identified in this Nexus Study.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Wastewater Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities that are necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the City’s CIP, or a portion of that cost is allocated to existing ratepayers in the City, as shown in Table B-1. Residential and non-residential development will be responsible for the fair-share portion of the total cost that will be allocated based on the gallons of wastewater generated per day for each separate land use category.

B. Demand Variable: Gallons of Wastewater Generated per Day Facility costs within the wastewater CIP are allocated to future development based on the number of gallons of wastewater generated per day. Both residential and non-residential land uses are described in terms of gallons of wastewater generated per day per acre; wastewater generation rates are based on rates included in the Wastewater Master Plan. The table below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use category.
732
City of Oakdale 22
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table VI-1
Gallons per Day Rates
Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Acre
Single Family 750
Multi-Family 1,610
Non-Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Acre
Retail 720
Office/Commercial 320
Industrial 160
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future demand projections, the City and its consultants have estimated the impact on the City’s wastewater system from development in the Fee Program Area. Wastewater facilities required to serve this development are identified and quantified in dollar terms in the City’s Wastewater Master Plan and are summarized in Table B-1 of Appendix B. The facilities included in Table B-1 have been prioritized by City staff based the City’s needs. The total cost of the wastewater facilities is $24.4 million, however, $17.2 million of this is allocated to ratepayers citywide since a major portion of the facilities provide a citywide benefit.

The total net cost of the wastewater improvements allocated to the Fee Program is $7.2 million.

Wastewater facilities include treatment plant improvements and expansion, wastewater trunks, pump stations, and collection facilities. Facilities have been sized to accommodate the additional wastewater that will be generated from future development in the City. 733
City of Oakdale 23
Capital Facilities Fee Update
D. Oversizing and Reimbursements
In order to accommodate future wastewater generation, oversized wastewater facilities were built by developers. A total amount of $561,000 in the CIP is for reimbursement for oversizing of prior improvements that the City and its engineers have determined will benefit all future development in the Fee Program Area. Table B-1in Appendix B identifies the improvements and costs of facilities that have been oversizing.

E. Calculation of Wastewater Fee
Table A-6 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Wastewater Fee. The table shows the total net infrastructure cost of $7.2 million to be allocated to the Fee Program as well as the total gallons of wastewater generated per day from development in the Fee Program Area. Dividing the total cost by the total gallons yields a cost per gallon of $13.39.

The $13.39 cost per gallon is applied to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per unit for residential development and per building square foot for non-residential development.

F. Wastewater Fee
The bottom section of Table A-6 shows the calculation of the Wastewater Fee. Applying the cost per gallon per day to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Wastewater Fees:
 $2,009 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $1,659 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $0.89 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.31 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.17 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 734
City of Oakdale 24
Capital Facilities Fee Update
VII. Water Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund water facility improvements needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Water Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in Section I of this report.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Water Fee is to fund water-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development in the Fee Program Area.

Identify the use of the fee. The Water Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of water facilities and a portion of the cost of a water conservation program identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. These facilities are identified in Table B-1 of Appendix B.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, the City’s water system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the water facilities identified in the City’s Water Master Plan will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide at an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional demand on the City’s water system. This will impact the water system and as a result, additional facilities will need to be constructed or improved 735
City of Oakdale 25
Capital Facilities Fee Update
in order to expand their capacity. The Water Master Plan identifies the need to improve specific water facilities as a result of development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Water Fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the City’s CIP, or a portion of that cost is allocated to existing ratepayers in the City, as shown in Table B-1. Residential and non-residential development will be responsible for the fair-share portion of the total cost that will be allocated based on the gallons of water generated per day for each separate land use.

B. Demand Variable: Gallons of Water Needed per Day
Water facility costs are allocated to development based on the number of gallons of water needed per day. The Water Master Plan identifies an average rate of 185 gallons per capita per day; this this rate is used in this Nexus Study. Residential land use demand for water facilities is described in terms of gallons of water needed per day per person, while non-residential demand factors are presented per employee. Table VII-1 below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use.
736
City of Oakdale 26
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table VII-1
Gallons per Day Rates
Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Person
Single Family 185
Multi-Family 93
Non-Residential Land Uses
Gallons per Day
per Employee
Retail 49
Office/Commercial 21
Industrial 27
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future demand projections, the City and its consultants have estimated the impact on the City’s water system from development in the Fee Program Area. Water facilities required to serve such development were identified and quantified in dollar terms in the City’s Water Master Plan and are summarized in Table B-1 of Appendix B. The facilities included in Table B-1 have been prioritized by City staff based on the City’s needs. The total cost of the water facilities is $33.2 million, however, $13.5 million of this is allocated to ratepayers citywide since the City’s consultant engineer determined that a portion of the facilities provide a citywide benefit.

The total net cost of the water improvements allocated to the Fee Program is $19.7 million. Water facilities include wells, storage tanks, distribution lines, a water conservation program, and the purchase of surface water. Facilities have been sized to accommodate the additional facility requirements of future development in the Fee Program Area. 737
City of Oakdale 27
Capital Facilities Fee Update
D. Water Conservation Program
Section 5 of the Water Master Plan describes the water conservation program in detail and identifies four scenarios or actions included in the conservation program that are either required by law or recommended by government agencies. The Master Plan further analyzes the effects of implementing the four scenarios and estimates that construction of four new water wells may be avoided as a result of implementing the water conservation program. The Master Plan estimates that the net present value of the capital and operating costs saved over a 30-year period as a result of implementing the conservation program is approximately $5.3 million. As a result, the cost of a portion of the water conservation program, $837,500, is included in the Fee Program CIP because the conservation program is expected to reduce the number of wells needed by the City and that the cost savings over time is expected to be much greater than the $837,500 cost included in the Fee Program

E. Oversizing and Reimbursements
In order to accommodate future water generation, oversized water facilities were built by developers.

A total amount of $612,000 in the CIP is for reimbursement for oversizing of prior improvements that the City and its engineers have determined will benefit all future development in the Fee Program Area. Table B-1in Appendix B identifies the improvements and costs of prior facilities oversizing.

F. Calculation of Water Fee
Table A-7 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Water Fee. The $19.7 million cost is allocated based on the estimated gallons of water needed per day from future development in the Fee Program Area. Dividing this total cost by the total gallons results in a cost per gallon of $13.12.

The cost per demand variable is then applied to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per unit for residential development or per building square foot for non-residential development.
738
City of Oakdale 28
Capital Facilities Fee Update
G. Water Fee
The bottom section of Table A-7 shows the calculation of the Water Fee. Applying the $13.12 cost per gallon to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Water Fees:
 $7,282 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $2,438 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $1.62 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.90 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.51 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 739
City of Oakdale 29
Capital Facilities Fee Update
VIII. Storm Drainage Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund storm drainage improvements needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Storm Drainage Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements presented in the Nexus Study.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Storm Drainage Fee is to fund storm drainage-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The Storm Drainage Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of storm drainage facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve the Fee Program Area. These facilities are identified in Table B-1 of Appendix B.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, the City’s storm drainage system will be impacted. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase the capacity of these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by new development. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct the storm drainage facilities identified in the City’s Storm drainage Master Plan will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional demand on the City’s storm drainage system. This will impact the storm drainage system and as a result, certain facilities will need to be improved in 740
City of Oakdale 30
Capital Facilities Fee Update
order to expand their capacity. The Storm drainage Master Plan identifies the need to improve specific storm drainage facilities as a result of development of the land uses in the Fee Program Area.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The storm drainage fee is calculated so that the fees collected offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the CIP in this Nexus Study, as shown in Table B-1, 100% of the facilities cost is allocated to the Fee Program Area. Residential and non-residential development will be responsible for the fair-share portion of the total cost that will be allocated based on the storm water runoff coefficient for each separate land use.

B. Demand Variable: Runoff Coefficient
Facility costs in the storm drainage CIP are allocated to development based on storm water runoff coefficients provided by the City. Table VIII-1 presents the runoff coefficient for each land use category.
741
City of Oakdale 31
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table VIII-1
Runoff Coefficient Rates
Residential Land Uses
Runoff
Coefficient
Single Family 0.40
Multi-Family 0.50

Non-Residential Land
Uses
Runoff
Coefficient
Retail 0.70
Office/Commercial 0.70
Industrial 0.70
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future projections and the geographic location of anticipated growth, the City estimated the impact on the current storm drainage system from development in the Fee Program Area. Storm drainage facilities needed to serve development were identified and quantified in dollar terms in the Storm Drainage Master Plan and summarized in Table B-1 in Appendix B. The total cost of these improvements is approximately $6.4 million. Facilities include storm drains and connections, storage basin expansion, pump stations, drywell rehabilitation, and improvement to drainage outfalls. These improvements will benefit all development in the Fee Program Area and therefore, separate fee zones, as are currently employed in the 2009 Nexus Study, will not be necessary.

D. Oversizing and Reimbursements
In order to accommodate future storm water generation, oversized storm water facilities were built by developers. A total cost of $735,000 in the CIP is for reimbursement for oversizing of improvements that the City and its engineers have determined will benefit all future development in 742
City of Oakdale 32
Capital Facilities Fee Update
the Fee Program Area. Table B-1in Appendix B identifies the improvements and costs of facilities that have been oversized by developers.

E. Calculation of Storm Drainage Fee Component
Table A-8 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Storm Drainage Fee. The total cost of approximately $6.4 million is allocated to each land use on a fair share basis based on the percent distribution derived from the product of a runoff coefficient and the acreage of each land use category. The Storm Drainage Fee for residential units is determined by dividing the portion of the cost allocated to residential units by the number of estimated residential units, while the Storm Drainage Fee for non-residential square footage is determined by dividing the allocated cost to each land use category by the estimated building square footage in the land use category.

F. Storm Drainage Fee
The bottom section of Table A-8 shows the calculation of the Storm Drainage Fee. Applying the calculation methodology described above results in the following Storm Drainage Fees:
 $1,027 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $494 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $0.83 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.64 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.69 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 743
City of Oakdale 33
Capital Facilities Fee Update
IX. Police Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund the police facilities needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Police Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in Section I.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Police Fee is to fund police-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The Police Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of additional police facilities, a fair-share portion of an animal shelter and vehicles needed to serve new development. These facilities are identified in Table A-9 in Appendix A.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, police facilities, an animal shelter, vehicles, and equipment will be impacted by the addition of residents and employees. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by the additional residents and employees. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase police facilities, an animal shelter, vehicles, and equipment will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional calls for police services. This will place excessive demand on the existing police force unless additional officer are hired by the City to maintain the 744
City of Oakdale 34
Capital Facilities Fee Update
existing level of service. The additional police personnel will need additional building space at the police station, vehicles, and equipment, to handle the additional calls for service.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Police Fee is calculated so that the fees collected will offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the police facilities in this Nexus Study. The police facilities included in this Nexus Study are based on the City’s current police level of service. This level of service is the basis of the assumptions used to calculate the additional building square footage to house future police personnel, and additional vehicles and equipment required to serve the Fee Program Area. For the animal shelter, only a portion of the cost is assigned to future development. A fair-share of the facilities costs are allocated based on a per person served approach.

B. Demand Variable: Persons Served
Facility costs included in the calculation of the Police Fee are allocated to development based on the estimated persons served. The persons served is equal to residents for residential land uses and employees for non-residential categories. The table below presents the different demand variables assigned to each land use. In the Police Fee calculation, residents are subject to the full cost per future person served, but employees are subject to a weighted amount (i.e., one employee equals

0.30 residents) since it is assumed that employees require less police services since they do not spend the full day at their place of employment.
745
City of Oakdale 35
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table IX-1
Persons Served Rates
Residential Land Uses
Persons
per Household
Single Family 3.00
Multi-Family 2.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Weight-Adjusted
Employees
per Acre
Retail 8.10
Office/Commercial 14.01
Industrial 5.56
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
The calculation of the Police Fee uses the standard-based fee methodology, which applies a consistent facility service level standard to new development regardless of projected development.

The amount of anticipated growth can be used to estimate revenues that will be generated at build out of the Fee Program Area.

Included in the total facilities cost are costs related to a fair-share portion of a police station expansion of substation, dispatch center expansion, an animal shelter, patrol cars, a radio communication system upgrade, and officer safety equipment. The total estimated cost of police facilities needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area is approximately $3.5 million.

This cost includes $1.7 million for an additional 4,083 square foot police station expansion or substation and $0.9 million for a new animal shelter. In addition, the total cost includes $930,000 for the purchase of 7 police vehicles, a radio communication system upgrade, police safety equipment, and an expansion of a dispatch center.
746
City of Oakdale 36
Capital Facilities Fee Update
D. Calculation of Police Fee Component
Table A-9 shows the calculation of total persons served, which is the sum total of the residential population plus 30% of the employee population generated by development in the Fee Program Area. The new animal shelter will serve the entire City at build out so only 32% of the total $2.9 million cost of this facility is allocated to future persons served. The remainder of the cost of the shelter will need to be funded through other sources. The remaining police facilities, vehicles, and equipment were sized based only on the needs of the future persons served in the City.

Dividing the total estimated $3.5 million police facilities cost by the estimated 10,804 persons served in the Fee Program Area at build out generates a cost per person served of $327. The cost per person served is then applied to the person served rates assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a Police Fee per unit for residential development and per building square foot for non-residential development.

E. Police Fee
The bottom section of Table A-9 shows the calculation of the Police Fee. Applying the $327 cost per future person served to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Police Fees:
 $982 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $655 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $0.25 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.33 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.14 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 747
City of Oakdale 37
Capital Facilities Fee Update
X. Fire Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund fire facilities needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Fire Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements discussed in Section I.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Fire Fee is to fund fire-related capital facilities attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The Fire Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of fire facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area.

These facilities are identified in Table A-10 of Appendix A.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, fire facilities, apparatus, and vehicles, will be impacted by the addition of residents and employees. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by the additional residents and employees. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase fire facilities, apparatus, and vehicles will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential and commercial/industrial development in the City will generate additional calls for fire services. This will place excessive demand on the existing fire personnel and facilities unless additional firefighters are hired by the 748
City of Oakdale 38
Capital Facilities Fee Update
City to maintain the existing level of service. The additional fire personnel will need additional facilities space, apparatus, and vehicles.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The Fire Fee is calculated so that the fees collected will offset the cost of constructing or purchasing the facilities necessary to serve new development in the Fee Program Area. Facilities to cure existing deficiencies or those required by the City’s existing development are excluded from the fire facilities in this Nexus Study. The fire facilities included in this Nexus Study are based City estimates of the additional facilities that will be needed to provide the Fee Program Area with an adequate level of fire services. This includes two new stations and their associated apparatus and vehicles, and a fair-share allocation of the value of the City’s existing western fire station and its apparatus and vehicles. A fair-share of the facilities costs are allocated based on a per persons approach.

B. Demand Variable: Persons Served
Facility costs included in the calculation of the Fire Fee are allocated to development based on the estimated persons served. The persons served factor is equivalent to residents for residential land uses and employees for non-residential categories. The table below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use. In the Fire Fee calculation, residents are subject to the full cost per future person served, but employees are subject to a weighted amount (i.e., one employee equals 0.30 residents) since it is assumed that employees require less fire services since they do not spend the full day at their place of employment.
749
City of Oakdale 39
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table X-1
Persons Served Rates
Residential Land Uses
Persons
per Household
Single Family 3.00
Multi-Family 2.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Weight-Adjusted
Employees
per Acre
Retail 8.10
Office/Commercial 14.01
Industrial 5.56
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
Based on future demand projections and the geographic location of anticipated growth, the City estimated the impact on current fire facilities from development in the Fee Program Area. Fire facilities needed to serve such development were identified and quantified in dollar terms as shown in Table A-10. The total cost of these existing and new facilities and vehicles is approximately $14 million, but only a fair-share of the total facilities cost is allocated to the Fee Program Area. Fire facilities include the City’s existing western fire station and apparatus, two new fire stations and apparatus, and a new ladder truck. One station will be located on the City’s eastern boundary, which would replace the City’s existing fire station on G Street, and a second station will be located in the southern portion of the City.

D. Calculation of Fire Fee
At build out of the Fee Area, the City will have three fire stations, apparatus, and a ladder truck. The stations will act as a singular system providing mutual support for areas in the City that are outside each station’s normal response range. As such, all of the three stations will provide a citywide 750
City of Oakdale 40
Capital Facilities Fee Update
benefit since no station will be assigned to only particular service area in the City. As a result, the allocation of the fire facilities cost is allocated to all existing and future development within the City.

So the total facilities cost of all fire facilities, existing and future, is estimated at $14.0 million and includes the existing western station and apparatus as well as the future facilities and apparatus.

This total cost is allocated to all development, existing and future, by build out of the City.

Table A-10 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the Fire Fee. The approximately $14.0 million total cost of facilities is used to determine a cost per person served. Total persons served from both residential and non-residential development at buildout equals 34,164. Dividing the total cost by the total persons served results in the cost per person served of $410.

The cost per person served is applied to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per unit for residential development or per building square foot for non-residential development.

E. Fire Fee
The bottom section of Table A-10 calculates the Fire Fee. Applying the $410 cost per person served to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following Fire Fees:
 $1,230 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $820 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $0.31 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.41 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.18 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 751
City of Oakdale 41
Capital Facilities Fee Update
XI. Parks and Recreation Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund park and recreation improvements needed to serve the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the Parks and Recreation Fee meet the AB 1600 nexus requirements.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Fee is to fund parks and recreation-related capital costs attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The Parks and Recreation Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of park and recreation facilities and land identified by the City to serve new development.

These facilities are identified in Table B-3 in Appendix B.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential development occurs in the City, existing park facilities will be impacted by the addition of new residents. In order for the City to maintain its existing 5.0 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, it will need to increase the amount of parks to serve the additional demand generated by the new residents. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase park land and improvements will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Residential development in the Fee Program Area will generate residents who will demand park facilities. This will place excessive demand on existing parks unless the City develops more park land. The City currently provides 752
City of Oakdale 42
Capital Facilities Fee Update
parks at a level of service that is approximately 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. Future residents will expect the City to maintain this level of service.

B. Demand Variable: Persons Served
Facility costs associated with the Parks and Recreation Fee are allocated to development based on persons served. The table below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use. The City estimates that non-residential development will not have a significant impact on park and recreation facilities, and therefore, costs are only allocated to residential development.

Table XI-1
Persons Served Rates
Residential Land Uses
Persons
per Household
Single Family 3.00
Multi-Family 2.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Weight-Adjusted
Employees
per Acre
Retail n/a
Office/Commercial n/a
Industrial n/a
753
City of Oakdale 43
Capital Facilities Fee Update
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
The City intends to maintain a park service level of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents, although it currently provides a service level that is slightly greater than this. Table B-3 identifies the park facilities and improvements and includes development of five new neighborhood parks, three pocket parks, and improvements or amenities for eight other parks. The additional new park acreage comes to 34.0 acres which is slightly less than the required 38.0 acres, based on a 5.0-acre per 1,000 resident service level. However, the City currently has in excess of 5.0 park acres per 1,000 residents and will continue to be above the 5.0-acre service level with the additional new park acres.

The total cost of the parks and recreation CIP is $22.9 million D. Calculation of Parks and Recreation Fee
Table A-11 presents the total park development and park land acquisition costs. The park facilities have been sized to serve future development in the Fee Program Area so the total cost of the park CIP is allocated to future development. Dividing these total cost by the number of future residents expected in the Fee Program Area results in the costs per resident of $2,203 for park development and $769 per resident for park land acquisition.

E. Parks and Recreation Fee
The bottom section of Table A-11 shows the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Fee. Applying the total cost per future resident to the demand variable assigned to each of the residential land use categories results in the following Parks and Recreation Fees:
 $8,917 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $5,945 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
754
City of Oakdale 44
Capital Facilities Fee Update
XII. General Government Fee
This section of the report identifies the facilities, costs, and fees required to fund general government facilities needed to serve future development in the Fee Program Area.

A. Nexus Test
The paragraphs below demonstrate how the General Government Fee meets the AB 1600 nexus requirements.

Identify the purpose of the fee. The purpose of the General Government Fee is to fund general government capital costs attributable to the impact from new development.

Identify the use of the fee. The General Government Fee will be used to fund the construction or purchase of general government facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. These facilities are identified in Table A-12 in Appendix A.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. As residential and commercial/industrial development occurs in the City, general government facilities, which include additional office space and vehicles, will be impacted by the addition of residents and employees. In order for the City to maintain an adequate level of service, it will need to increase these facilities to handle the additional demand generated by the additional residents and employees. The use of the fee revenue from the Fee Program to construct or purchase general government facilities and vehicles will ensure that these facilities will be available to provide an adequate level of service as the City grows.

Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. New general government facilities will be needed as new residential and non-residential development will generate additional residents and employees and increase the demand placed on the existing general governmental departments. 755
City of Oakdale 45
Capital Facilities Fee Update
This excessive demand on the existing government personnel will require the City to hire additional personnel to maintain the existing level of service. The additional City personnel will need additional building space and vehicles to perform their duties.

The current level of City employees will determine the level of service, in terms of City employees, needed for future development in the Fee Program Area. Based on the estimate of future City employees, additional building space and vehicles can be estimated and a cost can be assigned to these facilities. A fair-share of these facilities costs can then be allocated to land uses based on a per person approach.

B. Demand Variable: Persons Served
Facility costs used to calculate the General Government Fee are allocated to development based on persons served. Persons served are equivalent to residents for residential land uses and employees for non-residential categories. The table below presents the demand variables assigned to each land use. For the General Government Fee calculation, residents are subject to the full cost per future person served, but employees are subject to a weighted amount (i.e., one employee equals 0.30 residents) since it is assumed that employees require a less government service since they do not do not spend a full day at the workplace.
756
City of Oakdale 46
Capital Facilities Fee Update
Table XII-1
Persons Served Rates
Residential Land Uses
Persons
per Household
Single Family 3.00
Multi-Family 2.00
Non-Residential Land Uses
Weight-Adjusted
Employees
per Acre
Retail 8.10
Office/Commercial 14.01
Industrial 5.56
C. Facility Needs and Cost Estimates
The calculation of the General Government Fee uses the standard-based fee methodology, which applies a consistent facility service level standard to new development. The calculation assumes a service standard assuming that the City currently has approximately 4.0 City employees per 1,000 City residents. This is based on the City’s 88 employees serving the City’s 21,586 residents.

Assuming an average of 325 square feet of building space per City employee, the City will need approximately 10,000 additional square feet of office space to house the additional 31 employees needed by build out of the Fee Program Area. Assuming a building cost of $319 per square foot, the cost of the additional building space will be approximately $3.4 million.

In addition, a vehicle standard of 0.375 vehicles per employee is used in this Nexus Study to estimate a need for 12 additional vehicles for a total cost of $476,000. The total cost for the building and vehicles required to serve development in the Program Fee Area comes to approximately $3.8 million.
757
City of Oakdale 47
Capital Facilities Fee Update
D. Calculation of General Government Fee
Table A-12 shows the assumptions used in the calculation of the General Government Fee. The total persons served, which is estimated to be 10,804 at build out of the Fee Program Area is divided into the total facilities cost of approximately $3.8 million. This yields a cost per person served of $355.

The cost per person served is then applied to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories to arrive at a fee per unit for residential development or per building square foot for non-residential development.

E. General Government Fee Component
The bottom section of Table A-12 shows the calculation of the General Government Fee. Applying the $355 cost per future person served to the demand variable assigned to each of the land use categories results in the following General Government Fees:
 $1,066 per unit for Single Family land uses
 $711 per unit for Multi-Family land uses
 $0.27 per building square foot for Retail land uses
 $0.36 per building square foot for Office/Commercial land uses  $0.16 per building square foot for Industrial land uses 758
City of Oakdale 48
Capital Facilities Fee Update
XIII. Fee Program Summary
Table XIII-1 summarizes the fees in the Fee Program as calculated in this Nexus Study. Based on the City’s past experience regarding the cost to administer and maintain the Fee Program, a two percent (2.0%) administration fee is included to pay for these costs.

TABLE XIII-1

FEE PROGRAM SUMMARY

RESIDENTIAL LAND USES NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
Single Family Multi-Family Retail
Office/
Commercial Industrial
Facility Type (per Unit) (per Unit) (per Bldg. SF) (per Bldg. SF) (per Bldg. SF) Streets/Public
Works $4,865 $3,227 $5.42 $4.61 $2.77
Wastewater $2,009 $1,659 $0.89 $0.31 $0.17
Water $7,282 $2,438 $1.62 $0.90 $0.51
Storm Drainage $1,027 $494 $0.83 $0.64 $0.69
Police $982 $655 $0.25 $0.33 $0.14
Fire $1,230 $820 $0.31 $0.41 $0.18
Parks & Recreation $8,917 $5,945 n/a n/a n/a
General
Government $1,066 $711 $0.27 $0.36 $0.16
Administration
(2%) $548 $319 $0.19 $0.15 $0.09
Total $27,926 $16,268 $9.78 $7.71 $4.71
759
City of Oakdale 49
Capital Facilities Fee Update
XIV. Ongoing Administration of the Fee Program
A. Fee Adjustments
The fees in the Fee Program may be adjusted in future years to reflect revised facility standards, receipt of funding from alternative sources (i.e., state or federal grants), revised costs, or changes in demographics or the land use plan. In addition to such adjustments, the fees should be inflated each year by a predetermined index, such as the Engineering News-Record 20-City Construction Cost Index to ensure that the Fee Program does not collect less than is needed as facility costs rise due to inflation.

B. Fee Implementation
According to the California Government Code, prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee, an agency must hold at least one open and public meeting. At least ten days prior to this meeting, the agency must make data on infrastructure costs and funding sources available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting and a general explanation of the matter are to be published in accordance with Section 6062a of the Government Code, which states that publication of notice shall occur for ten days in a newspaper regularly published once a week or more. The City may then adopt the new fees at the second reading of the fee ordinance or resolution.

C. Annual Administrative Duties
The Government Code requires the City to report every year and every fifth year certain financial information regarding the fees. The City must make available within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year the following information from the prior fiscal year:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund

2. The amount of the fee

3. The beginning and ending balance in the account or fund 760
City of Oakdale 50
Capital Facilities Fee Update

4. The amount of the fee collected and the interest earned

5. An identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures

6. An identification of an approximate date by which time construction on the improvement will commence if it is determined that sufficient funds exist to complete the project

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account and when it will be repaid

8. Identification of any refunds made once it is determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund all fee-related projects
The City must make this information available for public review and must also present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public.

For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:

1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged

3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing any incomplete improvements

4. Designate the approximate dates on which funding in item (3) above is expected to be deposited into the fee account
As with the annual disclosure, the five-year report must be made public within 180 days after the end of the City’s fiscal year and must be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled public meeting.

These findings must be made by the City; otherwise, the law requires that the City refund the money on a prorated basis to the then current record owners of the development project. 761
City of Oakdale 51
Capital Facilities Fee Update
D. Fee Credits or Reimbursements
The City may provide fee credits or possibly reimbursements to developers who dedicate land or construct facilities. Fee credits or reimbursements may be provided up to the cost of the improvement, as shown in an applicable improvement plan, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, or the actual cost paid by the developer, whichever is lower. For construction cost overruns, only that amount shown in the applicable improvement plan, subject to periodic inflation adjustments, should be credited or reimbursed. The City will evaluate the appropriate fee credit or reimbursement based on the value of the dedication or improvement. Credits or reimbursements may be repaid based on the priority of the capital improvements, as determined by the City. In some cases, repayment for constructed facilities that have low priority may be postponed. Fee credits and reimbursements will be determined by the City on a case-by-case basis.

E. Interfund Transfers
The City may allow for the transfer of fee revenues between fee funds. This will provide greater funding flexibility and facilitate the timely phasing of improvements by allowing fees to be combined and used as necessary. All interfund transfers must be repaid with interest. 762

APPENDIX A
Capital Facilities Fee Program Calculations
763
Storm Parks & General Administration Total
Land Use Street Wastewater Water Drainage Police Fire Recreation Government (2.0% of Fees) CFF Residential
Single Family $4,865 $2,009 $7,282 $1,027 $982 $1,230 $8,917 $1,066 $548 $27,926 Multi-Family $3,227 $1,659 $2,438 $494 $655 $820 $5,945 $711 $319 $16,268 Non-Residential
Retail $5.42 $0.89 $1.62 $0.83 $0.25 $0.31 n/a $0.27 $0.19 $9.78 Office/Commercial $4.61 $0.31 $0.90 $0.64 $0.33 $0.41 n/a $0.36 $0.15 $7.71 Industrial $2.77 $0.17 $0.51 $0.69 $0.14 $0.18 n/a $0.16 $0.09 $4.71 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc.

Table A-1
Fee Program Summary
Per Unit
Per Bldg. SF
A-1 764
Current Proposed
City City
Impact Impact Percent
Land Use Category Fees Fees Change
Single Family $29,642 $27,926 -5.8%
Multi-Family $16,148 $16,268 0.7%
Retail $10.40 $9.78 -5.9%
Office/Commercial $9.73 $7.71 -20.7%
Industrial $5.23 $4.71 -9.9%
Source: Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc.

Current Proposed
City City
Impact Impact Percent
Facility Category Fees Fees Change
Streets/Public Works $4,285 $4,865 13.5%
Wastewater $5,665 $2,009 -64.5%
Water $5,330 $7,282 36.6%
Storm Drainage (1) $3,600 $1,027 -71.5%
Police $720 $982 36.4%
Fire $1,354 $1,230 -9.2%
Parks and Recreation $7,590 $8,917 17.5%
General Government $517 $1,066 106.2%
Administration Fee $581 $548 -5.8%
Total $29,642 $27,926 -5.8%
(1) Current Storm drainage fee is the average of the North, East, and West fee zones from 2009 Nexus Study.